TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MurfittTauranga

Saved - March 31, 2025 at 5:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that the Burnett Foundation Aotearoa has removed their posts about eating and smearing poop during sex, which seemed inconsistent with their mission. Given the Ministry of Health's significant funding to them, it's concerning that taxpayer money might support such content. I discussed this with my husband, recalling an experience with our son after his hospital stay, where the Ministry questioned his ability to wash his hands due to his special needs. This raises questions about priorities in health funding and advocacy. Love is love, and that’s not the issue here.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

It would seem that the Burnett Foundation Aotearoa (formerly New Zealand Aids Foundation) became uncomfortable about their website and social media posts normalising eating and smearing pooh during sex being publicised, which does not align with their stated purpose on the Charities Register, as the posts have been removed today. Given that @familyfirstnz had its charitable status overturned and @radionz reported back in 2022 that the courts found "the organisation's advocacy was not fair, balanced or respectful", I am glad that the BFA has reflected on their stated purpose and removed questionable material. It is great that the BFA reflected given that the Ministry of Health provides millions of dollars to BFA despite the crumbling health system and people in genuine need of health care being on long waiting lists. I was talking to my husband this evening about the BFA removing their posts about eating and smearing pooh and we talked about when my son got out of Tauranga Hospital a few years ago after having bad gastro following sushi. The Ministry of Health @tewhatuora (it may appear I have been blocked today from at least Facebook- see screenshot in the comments) telephoned me after he was released from Tauranga Hospital and said that he could not attend school. I asked why and they said that he did not have the ability to wash his hands as he had special needs. I challenged that, and as the caller had never met my son, we practice handwashing at home. How does this sit with you and our taxpayer money being spent directly on posts about eating and smearing pooh and apparently the Ministry of Health indirectly funding other funders? This is not about who you love. Love is love and anyone that attacks me on that basis does not get the point. @KiwiAly @HopeRising19 @wideawake_media @letkidsbekidsnz @BGatesIsaPyscho @2ETEKA @nzdsos @theplatform_nz @NZNationalParty @nzfirst @Young_NZFirst @actparty @nzlabour

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Urge Parties and eating pooh seem so far from the stated purpose of this registered charity to achieve zero transmission of HIV and reduce stigma. A good purpose which most support. The Burnett Foundation Aotearoa receives millions from the Ministry of Health and the funders and partners shown below. When so many charities struggle and our health system is crumbling, why are we supporting a charity that promotes unsafe and unhealthy practices.

Saved - September 2, 2024 at 7:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Health New Zealand reported that 25,623 people died within 93 days of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. I previously shared an email from the Coroners Court indicating that deaths could occur up to 93 days post-vaccination. In 2021, New Zealand registered 35,007 deaths, with a 10% increase in 2022. HNZ clarified that the reported figure encompasses all-cause mortality, including accidental deaths, which raises questions about the accuracy of COVID-19 death classifications. What do you think?

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Health New Zealand (“HNZ”) states that 25,623 people have died within 93 days of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand. As you may recall, I posted an email from the Coroners Court to the Ministry of Health dated 23 August 2021 which stated that research showed that death following the COVID-19 vaccine "might be as long as 93 days". The original post is below. According to Te Whatu Ora’s website, in 2021 there were 35,007 deaths registered in New Zealand. Stats NZ’s website affirms that deaths rose by 10% in 2022. HNZ states that the figure that they released in response to my Official Information Request under the Act is for "all-cause mortality" and includes deaths such as accidents. As you will recall a man that died from a gunshot in Auckland was counted as a COVID-19 death. What are your thoughts? Links in the comments below. @nzdsos @KimDotcom @HopeRising19 @PeterSweden7 @winstonpeters @nzfirst @SeanPlunket @theplatform_nz @actparty @BrookevanVelden @Strange_G @infowars @SGTreport @sussdoc @RCR_NZ

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

As promised, the OIA response which contained this email stating that death could occur up to 93 days after the injection. https://t.co/iG7aKHPg5Z

Saved - July 28, 2024 at 10:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised concerns about heart symptoms following the COVID-19 vaccine, referencing a letter from the former NZ Director General of Health that acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis risks within 30 days and potential deaths up to 93 days post-vaccination. This letter was prompted by Rory Nairn's death and highlights the need for better communication about these risks. I question whether the public was adequately informed during the vaccine rollout or if the government prioritized a "safe and effective" narrative instead.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Did you suffer from heart symptoms within 30 days of the COVID-19 vaccine or did a loved one die within 93 days of the COVID-19 vaccine? The former NZ Director General of Health and company sent a letter to doctors in mid-December 2021 following Rory Nairn's death and his financée posting the preliminary coroner's report on social media. The letter clearly states that myocarditis and pericarditis could occur up to 30 days after the COVID-19 vaccine and we know from the email dated 23 August 2021 from the Coroner's Court that they believed the timeframe for death was up to 93 days (a copy of the letter is in the comments). The letter states that: "Finally, could we ask you to cascade the requirements across your provider network and confirm in writing that local planning and clinical leadership is in place to guide a local response to prevent the serious consequences of undiagnosed or untreated myocarditis/pericarditis." Do you feel that this important information was adequately communicated to the public during the mandates and the days of the vaccine passports? Or do you feel that the Government continued to push the "safe and effective" narrative during this time?

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

The email from the NZ Coroner's Court in August 2021 stating that research suggested that death from the COVID-19 vaccine could be as long as 93 days. https://t.co/DvVQNWbdK0

Saved - July 24, 2024 at 7:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have submitted a petition to initiate a Citizens Initiated Referendum to end our relationship with the World Health Organization due to concerns about private funders' influence. The WHO's budget relies heavily on voluntary contributions, with only 13% coming from member states. If the Clerk accepts the petition, we need 367,377 signatures from registered voters within a year. I’m seeking volunteers for various roles, including a Steering Committee, Fundraising Committee, and community outreach for signature collection. Interested individuals can contact us via email. Thank you.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Exit the WHO: I have submitted a petition to the Clerk of the House of Representatives (“the Clerk”) to start a petition seeking a Citizens Initiated Referendum to terminate our relationship with the World Health Organization (“WHO”) due to the vested interests and undue influence of private funders. Member states & private partners fund WHO. In 2022-23 members states’ assessed contributions made up 13% of the budget, with WHO relying on 87% of voluntary contributions. Please note that the Clerk has the final say on the wording of the petition, and then it must be advertised for up to three months. If accepted, 10% of registered voters must sign the petition supporting the referendum question. There are approximately 3,673,774 registered voters in NZ, so we need at least 367,377 signatures within the statutory 12-month timeframe. There is a $50,000 spending limit on promoting the petition, so I need a lot of volunteers. We have a couple of months to get organised, so I am calling for volunteers for the following roles: 1) Steering Committee. 2)Fundraising Committee. 3)Creative People Committee. 4)General Volunteers. 5)Volunteers who are willing to go out into the community and collect signatures. If you are interested, please contact us at admin@kmlaw.co.nz and put the type of volunteering in the subject line. If you are volunteering for the roles through 1 to 3, please send a brief bio. Thank you. @c_plushie @nzdsos @RCR_NZ @HopeRising19 @nzfirst @actparty @KimDotcom @theplatform_nz

Saved - July 14, 2024 at 8:51 PM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Remember when the New Zealand government wanted to put the vaccine into your drinking water? What do you think about the ethics of their proposal? What about informed consent? https://t.co/4Gkgu3TeSe

Saved - July 5, 2024 at 8:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I appreciate @Channel7 for raising important questions about the lack of investigation into side effects. With 144,000 official adverse reaction reports in Australia, it's crucial to determine the true number. Let's seek justice. @actparty @nzfirst @SeanPlunket @theplatform_nz @c_plushie @nzdsos @HopeRising19

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

I thank @Channel7 for starting to ask questions. Is the doctor being generous when she says that there is a lack of 'medical curiosity' to investigate the side effects, or is it now 'willful blindness'? 144,000 official adverse reactions reports in Australia but what is the real number. #justiceiscoming @actparty @nzfirst @SeanPlunket @theplatform_nz @c_plushie @nzdsos @HopeRising19

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a lack of medical curiosity in investigating vaccine side effects. The number of adverse reactions reported is small compared to the actual cases. Patients with vaccine injuries struggle to be heard and compensated. Medical practitioners need to engage with affected individuals, conduct research, and provide safe healthcare. The compensation scheme is inadequate, requiring extensive documentation for claims. Many young people are experiencing serious health issues post-vaccination. More support and follow-up are needed for those suffering from vaccine injuries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there anything to learn from people who've had side effects that both of you are describing in detail? Speaker 1: There is so much to learn. There's an incredible lack of medical curiosity about investigating this. The TGA take the reports. Yep. Apparently, there have been 144, 000, adverse reaction reports. But that's a drop in the ocean compared to the number of actual adverse reactions that there are because a lot of them aren't being reported because certainly in the early days they weren't being recognized. So there is so much that needs to happen to engage with people who have suffered vaccine injuries and for us to move forward. Speaker 2: And to provide compensation because the compensation scheme is hopeless. Speaker 1: And then when the adverse reactions, happen and people try to make a claim and some people, their lives have been destroyed. Speaker 2: 3 years. 3 years, I have suffered and they said you don't fit our compensation scheme. Speaker 1: The criteria are extremely narrow, and it doesn't anywhere near cover the breadth of adverse reactions that people are suffering. Speaker 2: Karen, we're going to continue with you on the panel as well. But Jackie, I want to thank Speaker 0: you for sharing your story. Speaker 3: There is so much to learn. Firstly, listen to patients when they tell you something has happened to them. I've got so many patients who have sought me out because they know that I'm interested in dealing with people who have had a vaccine injury or who suspect they've had a vaccine injury. Many of them have gone to hospital with chest pains, palpitations, feeling extremely unwell, they They had ECG in the standard test. They were told everything is normal. You're just anxious. Go home. I've had other people really struggling to find their medical practitioners who will listen to you and engage with them. Speaker 2: There's an incredible lack of Speaker 3: medical curiosity about investigative news. A drop in the ocean compared to the number of actual adverse reactions that there are because a lot of them aren't being reported because certainly in the early days they weren't being recognized. What we need to see is a high level of medical curiosity, we need a high level of engagement with people who have suffered a vaccine injury, they need to be studied, we need research funding and we need to be able to have safe health care. I can continue to work in general practice because we wear N95 respirators, we have HEPA filters in each room, we have screening of patients for symptoms, we are able to provide telehealth, so there are ways that we can provide safe health care. We because the TGA never gets back to anyone. They compile this data but they don't actually follow-up. They don't know how long these vaccine injuries have gone on for. They don't yes. They they don't go back to people and say, you know are you still suffering what's happening with you now there is no system to do that so there is so much that needs to happen to engage with people who have suffered vaccine injuries and for us to move forward. Speaker 2: And to provide compensation because the compensation scheme is hopeless. Speaker 3: Well, the other thing too, I'm trying to help people who are, presenting to me with, vaccine injuries that have been, actually said by their specialists with vaccine injuries and and I try to help them with Speaker 2: the forms that they're filling out. Speaker 3: Most people do large amount of documentation so some people have got piles of documentation that they arrive with, and something like 90% of the the compensation claims that have gone in gone in and that's an example of the sort of documentation that people have to say these are the hospital admission reports, these are my specialist reports, these are my, results that I've had from blood tests, from MRIs. I mean I've never seen so many young people having cardiac MRIs in my entire career there you know there are people who've had, heart damage myocarditis, Speaker 2: they've had keratosis, they've had cerebral problems, gastritis, Speaker 0: To keep the conversation going and for more information about our stories, follow us on Instagram and Facebook to handle 7 News Spotlight.
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 3:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Fauci expressed concerns about the possibility of vaccines worsening people's health. He also mentioned the need for extended studies to determine if the induced response enhances infection. The New Zealand government redacted information about vaccine side effects, raising questions about democracy, human rights, and informed consent. Government responses suggest serious side effects, including death, up to at least 93 days after vaccination.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

How is your health? A few years ago, Dr. Fauci admitted on camera that “[t]his would not be the first time, if it happens, that a vaccine looked good in initial safety actually made people worse” The former Chief Medical Advisor to the President and Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases also states that: “[w]hen you vaccinate someone and they make an antibody response then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce actually enhance the infection and make it worse and the only way you will know that is if you do an extended study, not in a normal volunteer who has no risk of infection but people that are out there in a risk situation.” The New Zealand government knew this in January 2021 as is evidenced by the Clinical Evaluation. Then redacted many pages about the possible side effects. Are we living in a democracy which upholds human rights and informed consent for a medical treatment that has serious side effects, including death up to at least 93 days according to the government's own OIA responses.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccines must be carefully studied to ensure they do not worsen infections. Past vaccines, like the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine for children, have unexpectedly made things worse. Similarly, an HIV vaccine increased infection risk in some cases. It's crucial to conduct thorough studies in high-risk populations to understand how vaccines truly impact infections before widespread use.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The element to safety. And that is if you vaccinate someone and they make an antibody response and then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce actually enhance the infection and make it worse. And the only way you'll know that is if you do an extended study, not in a normal volunteer who has no risk of infection, but in people who are out there in a risk situation. This would not be the first time if it happened that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse. It was the history of the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in children, which paradoxically made the children worse. 1 of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected. So you can't just go out there and give it.
Saved - May 17, 2024 at 3:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facility in Alaska has been confirmed to have a connection with a region near New Zealand. The facility launches ELF/VLF waves into the magnetosphere during ship traverses in that area, which interact with energetic electrons of the magnetospheric plasma. Further information about this project can be found in the provided links.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Who knew the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) ionospheric heater facility has been in our backyard since 2004. This information has been confirmed by the NZ Government in an OIA. The abstract in ResearchGate states, "During its annual austral summer traverses between Christchurch and McMurdo Station, "Nathaniel B. Palmer" passes through a region that is geomagnetically conjugate to the HAARP location. During the ship's traverses through the ~300-km long conjugate area (at ~1000 km south-east of New Zealand), the HAARP facility in Alaska will operate at full-power, launching ELF/VLF waves into the magnetosphere, which then propagate along the geomagnetic field lines to the southern hemisphere, being amplified along their wave due to cyclotron resonance interactions with energetic electrons of the magnetospheric plasma." Please post information in regard to this project below." Links below

Saved - March 21, 2024 at 8:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post reflects on a past incident where someone expressed a desire to hunt down the unvaccinated. The author questions the effectiveness of the vaccine, highlighting that it had not been tested for transmission prevention and may cause harm. They argue that considering both COVID-19 and the vaccine's overall harm is important, criticizing the government for alleged bias.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Friday throw back. Never forget that this thing (he doesn't know what a woman is, so I assume the same logic applies to knowing what a man is) wanted to hunt down the unvaccinated. He knew at this point in time that the vaccine had not been tested to ascertain if it stopped transmission, that it did not stop infection, and that it caused harm and potentially death. If any pulls out his line about preventing serious disease, you must consider the overall harm to Kiwis by looking at both CV19 and the vaccine. To do otherwise shows a complete bias. Just like the government has done and continues to do.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We aim to vaccinate everyone by the end of the year, but some may need to be followed up with in early next year. While we want all New Zealanders to get vaccinated, there may be hesitant individuals we have to actively reach out to. Our goal is to ensure everyone has the opportunity to get vaccinated, even if it means some follow-up into next year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think early next year, we'll be in the phase of chasing up people who haven't come forward to get their vaccination or have missed their bookings and so on. So everyone will be able to get a vaccine between now and the end of the year. But of course, you know, and I want every New Zealander to come forward, but human behaviour suggests that there will be some people that we have to actually really go out and look for and some of that may spill into next year. But our commitment is everyone will have the opportunity to get the vaccine by the end of the year. Everyone will but I can't say that, you know, that we're not going to have some hesitant people or some people who just haven't come forward that we don't have to go out and find next year.
Saved - February 24, 2024 at 10:47 PM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Do you think this 2022 "science " supported by the "statistics" from "experts" stacks up in 2024?; https://t.co/JODfqtljTq

Saved - January 29, 2024 at 6:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The OIA information I received reveals that Bloomfield and the Working Group International Health Regulations (WGIHR) plan to bypass Article 55 of the International Health Regulations. The Ministry of Health has redacted information about the WGIHR in their OIA response, citing legal privilege. Transparency is lacking, and the government should release the information. Stay tuned for more updates.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

This OIA information I received on Friday is interesting. We know that Bloomfield has confirmed on behalf of the Working Group International Health Regulations ("WGIHR") that they will circumvent Article 55 of the current International Health Regulations, which allows state parties four months to consider any amendments prior to the World Health Assembly in May 2024. The amendments which have been worked on behind closed doors since early 2023 should have been released yesterday, being 27 January 2024. Why has the Ministry of Health, via the Public Health Agency, redacted information about the WGIHR their OIA response? They are claiming that the reason to withhold satisfies section 9(2)(h) of the Official Information Act 1982 as there is legal privilege. Where is the transparency given we fund the Government and our elected representatives are meant to represent us and be accountable? If there is nothing to see, they should release the information. More interesting information to come. @winstonpeters @TanyaUnkovichMP @nzfirst @ShaneJones_MP

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:14 PM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

The Minister of Internal Affairs has confirmed that the public will be consulted on potential changes to the CV19 inquiry's terms of reference. NB: Greg has permitted me to share this correspondence. https://t.co/6nAOuEFXsS

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 6:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The post raises concerns about the use of Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRAD) by the NZ police on children during protests. The author shares a photo of what came out of their son's nose after the alleged incident. They criticize the mandates and the Traffic Light System, questioning their implementation without proper testing of the vaccine's ability to stop transmission. The post ends with a belief that justice will be served eventually.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

This post is uncomfortable, and so it should be given the damage to our children - social, economic and well-being. Have the NZ police used Long Range Accoustic Devices ("Lrad") on children in the protests today? The gross photo above is what came out of my son's nose after the NZ police used Lrad in Wellington against citizens that were exercising a democratic right to protest against the mandates and the illogical Traffic Light System. Neither mandate should have been implemented if the vaccine had not been tested to ascertain if it stopped transmission or not, along with hundreds of millions of taxpayers money being used to promote a defective product that made billions for Pfizer. Justice will come in time.

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Crown Law refuses to provide me with information on how the International Health Regulations will affect New Zealand's sovereignty. Taxpayers have the right to know. I will appeal to the ombudsman. Crown Law also claims to have no correspondence on the impact of the IHR on Treaty obligations. Stay tuned.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Crown Law has denied me access to correspondence regarding the International Health Regulations ("IHR") impact on NZ's sovereignty. Both Crown Law and their client, being our former Government, are funded by the taxpayers, and we have the right to know how the IHR will impact our nation. I will appeal to the ombudsman. I also note that Crown Law states it holds no correspondence on how the IHR will impact on Treaty obligations. Spread the word and watch this space.

Saved - December 4, 2023 at 6:14 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

I believe this extract is from Pharmacy Today magazine

@nzdsos - NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science

From July 2022… follow the money… never forget. #StopTheSilence #mRNA #nzpol #nzpolitics #money https://t.co/JHwQLgKd3K

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 5:38 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

I felt so frustrated after emailing a detective in early Feb 2022 & being brushed off. Glad that there is some justice being served in 2023. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/parliament-protests-high-ranking-police-officer-faces-civil-action-in-relation-to-two-arrests/SXHMXHK2ARALFGPLZYBSNNMRJY/

NZ Herald - Breaking news, latest news, business, sport and entertainment - NZ Herald Latest breaking news articles, photos, video, blogs, reviews, analysis, opinion and reader comment from New Zealand and around the World - NZ Herald nzherald.co.nz
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 3:58 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Do you have questions about the conflict of interests and how online question of vaccines relates to the proposed United Nations Convention of Cybercrime? The UN concluding session is to be held early next year https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/cybercrime/ad_hoc_committee/ahc_concluding_session/main (links below)

Concluding session of the Ad Hoc Committee Concluding session of the Ad Hoc Committee unodc.org
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Klaus Schwab in discussions back in 2019 how to deliver the UN's Agenda 2030. Why is WHO interested in Agenda 2030 and not focusing on health? https://t.co/gPcYdXT4A4

Saved - November 1, 2023 at 6:28 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

When you have to send the Govt its own info as Parliamentary Services says they have looked at a number of sources and can't find any info about the timing and process of the amendments in order to approve my petition. It would seem that the Govt is being stealth. See comments. https://t.co/XYCB4wrWlG

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 6:45 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

The Coroners Court requested confirmation of a 93 day timeframe for deaths following the CV19 vaccine. The MOH replied that there was no timeframe. Interestingly, the Coroners Act was amended in 2022. My submissions are set out in the comments. https://t.co/fkrT65Dg04

Saved - October 27, 2023 at 7:31 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

As per my Jan 2022 open letter, the Minutes of the CV19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group dated 11/5/21 recorded an “unprecedented” levels of injuries & 4 signals, including myocarditis. 8 months later the MOH issued an update for myocarditis – this was too late for Rory Nairn. https://t.co/92HyqM82KG

Saved - October 17, 2023 at 2:37 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

I have verified that this OIA is legitimate (https://fyi.org.nz/request/24106-sudden-deaths-responded-to-by-police). I will do a follow on OIA to see if 5,942 sudden deaths in a year is normal or not. Let me know if you know how to access this information quicker than going through the OIA process.

Sudden deaths responded to by Police - a Official Information Act request to New Zealand Police My name is Samantha Bright and I am requesting the total number of deaths in the past year attended to by police please. I am particularly interested in if possible how many units attended, their response times, their time on scene and if St John attended. I am attempting to study these collaboratively with St John statistics to open a discussion into the potential of a designated unit to free up Police units to attend other jobs. I appreciate any help on this. Yours faithfully, Samantha Bright. fyi.org.nz
View Full Interactive Feed