reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MythinformedMKE
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Your CEO literally admits to firing/hiring people based on their race and gender. https://t.co/kvQrrlTBwz
Video Transcript AI Summary
We recognized the importance of diversity in achieving success, so we made it a priority. We established a vision, values, and made leadership changes. As a result, our leadership team now consists of almost 50% women and 47% people of color. We aim to set the standard for diversity and inclusion in the NBA, and we were honored with the NBA's diversity and inclusion award in January for our efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because I know the business case for diversity and you have to have a diverse group of people around the table, if you really wanna be as successful as you can be. And so so we took that on. So we laid out that vision, laid out a set of values, and then I had 1 on 1 with all the employees and then made some leadership changes.
Speaker 1: And so
Speaker 0: now we have almost 50% women in leadership and 47% people of color. And so diversity matters. It matters.
Speaker 1: So your, your goal was to set the NBA standard for leadership, for, for diversity and inclusion. And, and do you, Are you now the most diverse and inclusive leadership, team and for an MBA organization?
Speaker 0: I know we're, we're, we're somewhere at the top of, We actually ended up getting the MBA's, diversity and inclusion award in January. Wow. For all of the work that we have done.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
“What’s the most dangerous animal on the planet? White people.” Hollywood is completely captured by Woke. This is not fake. This is a real movie. https://t.co/nQoCQU9cZw
Video Transcript AI Summary
I witnessed the discomfort Aaron felt while walking through a room full of white people. It was painful to watch. We decided to skip a job interview and instead join a recruiting class at the American Society of Magical Negroes. I don't fully understand why, but it seems easier to deal with the most dangerous animal on the planet than with white people feeling uncomfortable. Their discomfort often leads to negative consequences for us, so we constantly fight against it. The happier they are, the safer we are.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know you can feel their discomfort, Aaron. Watching you walk through a room full of white people was the most painful thing I've seen. Excuse me. Sorry. I don't wanna take you to a job interview.
There's a recruiting class starting right now, and we gotta get you in it. Welcome Welcome to the American Society of Magical Negroes. So I don't really understand. Ever It's easier to shed it. What's the most dangerous animal on the planet?
Shark. White people when they feel uncomfortable. White people feeling uncomfortable precedes a lot of bad stuff for us. That's why we fight white discomfort ever Every day. Because the happier they are, the safer we
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
On American Thought Leaders, @akheriaty explains to @JanJekielek the ill-conceived research designed to add vaccines to foods such as lettuce and spinach. Moreover, he is worried about the loss of informed consent if "self-spreading" vaccine technology is introduced. https://t.co/guXzb1zY43
Video Transcript AI Summary
Transgenic lettuce is being developed to produce mRNA vaccines. The idea is to genetically engineer lettuce and spinach so that consuming them can provide vaccination against biological threats. However, there are scientific problems and potential health risks associated with this proposal. Moreover, it is part of a broader plan to bypass informed consent by incorporating mRNA gene technology into food. Another concerning concept is self-spreading vaccines, where respiratory viruses carry the vaccine and infect others. These proposals are seen as dangerous, reckless, and ethically and scientifically unsound.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that is being developed, is, transgenic lettuce that will be able to produce, you know, mRNA to vaccine 1 head of lettuce per person. Yeah. This is apparently what some people think is reasonable to be working on after seeing, you know, how these genetic vaccines have been deployed? What do you think?
Speaker 1: Yeah. The idea is genetically engineer lettuce and spinach, and then you can have a salad and get vaccinated against, you know, potential biological threats. There are some serious scientific problems with this proposal, oral tolerance and other issues that we probably don't have Time to get into. But there's there's very serious reasons to believe, 1, this will not work for its intended purpose. And 2, it's gonna cause potentially some serious health harms.
But I think more important for our conversation is this this is part of a broader proposal of potentially bypassing the informed consent process by putting mRNA gene based technology in foods. There's also research that I described at the very end of the prologue on self spreading vaccines, Vaccines that are themselves carried by respiratory viruses, viruses that supposedly are not supposed to make you Very sick, but these, you know, 10%, 15% of the population gets a vaccine, and the rest of the population sort of catches the vaccine contagiously Because the vaccine itself is being carried by a virus. To to my mind, these are Not just dangerous, but downright ludicrous proposals. I I think they're entirely reckless, ethically and, and scientifically and medically.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
While some colleges say they *might* start to address anti-Jewish sentiment on campus… American colleges & professors are still very comfortable with calling for white genocide and hatred for white people. Just listen to them: https://t.co/c5O8IG3v8e
Video Transcript AI Summary
Various professors from different universities have made controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their death or genocide. Some professors claim that white people are inherently racist or inhuman. Others argue that white privilege exists and that reverse racism is not real. These statements have sparked debates and discussions about race and discrimination. Additionally, there have been instances of professors promoting violence against white people or calling for them to give their money to black people. These controversial remarks have caused outrage and concern among the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Texas A&M professor asks, when is it okay to kill whites? New York professor says having a white nuclear family promotes white supremacy. Professor tweets that white people should commit mass suicide. College professor says kill cops, kill all white people, and kill the straits. Professor says all I want for Christmas is white genocide.
Georgetown professor says all white people are racist. Trinity College professor calls white people inhuman. Let them fucking die. College professor says believing in hard work is a white ideology. College professor says white people are conditioned to commit mass murder.
A professor equates math with white privilege. A professor says white supremacist patriarchy is responsible for the Vegas shooting. Professors hold a white racism course at FGCU. USC professor calls for a holocaust against all white people. Professor says, I'll teach my children to be cautious and distrust friendship with white people.
Baltimore professor says white people need to personally give all of their money 2 black people. College professor says some white people may have to die to solve racism. College professor says white masculinity is a problem for America. Georgetown professor says all white people are racist. Rutgers professor was taken to the NYC Hospital for psychiatric evaluation after he tweeted threatening to kill white people.
White professor calls all white people to mass suicide because of slavery. Here's a slide from a college classroom Net says white tears on a mug. Here's another slide from a college classroom that says white people stay colonizing. White privilege does exist. Bigfoot, unicorns, reverse ism, what do they all have in common?
Stating that reverse racism isn't real. Y'all white people are dangerous. The horror story. White people are a plague to the planet. Here's one that says white people are crazy.
And finally, how white people play
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
“Whiteness prevents white people from connecting to humanity.” Ibram X. Kendi receives a giant applause from the Netflix film screening audience after demonizing white people around the world. https://t.co/N2PkJ9WsKN
Video Transcript AI Summary
White people worldwide need to recognize how their personal identity is shaped by whiteness and how it hinders their ability to connect with humanity. Understanding that they are part of humanity, rather than above it, allows them to empathize with people who look different from them. Whiteness prevents this connection and creates societal and personal problems. The film and this work aim to liberate people from these issues and the lies they have been told about themselves and others. This liberation is beneficial for everyone involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That I I don't think, white, people worldwide have really reckoned with how much their own personal identity is shaped by constructions of whiteness and and how much, that construction of whiteness prevents, white people from, connecting to humanity. In other words, recognizing that, when you when you recognize that you are part and parcel of humanity. In other words, you're not over humanity. Right? It it allows you to really be able to connect to people who don't look like you, who have kinky hair, who have dark skin, and to see yourself in them.
And it's whiteness that prevents that. Right, and when you're not able to see yourself, in other human beings, that creates all sorts of problems. But not just societal problems, personal problems, that I think hopefully this film and this work will liberate those folks are from. So I think it's liberating all the way around, right? It it you know, I think it will liberate, you know, really all of us because, you know, we've all been told a lie about ourselves and other people.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
If you drink enough Absolut Vodka, hooking up with your friend Dave doesn’t look so bad. Is that the message here? https://t.co/zBGi59ot2e
Video Transcript AI Summary
I met Dave at a party, but he introduced himself as Darla. Reluctantly, I stayed and Darla took me backstage. We had a great time at a party and took many photos. Darla opened up about her journey, and I realized she was still the same person. I had changed, not her. I thanked Darla for bringing me back.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You could feel the energy, the DJs, the parties, laughing, dancing. Then I turned around and saw Dave. Only it wasn't the Dave I remember. He told me his name was Darla now. I tried to make an excuse to get away, then she grabbed my hand.
The next thing I know, running to see this DJ. Darla knew somebody, and suddenly, we're backstage drinking absolute sea breezes. We went to this party, and we watched the parade. Dave, we took a 1000000 pictures in this photo booth. We walked, and she told me she always felt this way.
I just listened, and somehow I understood. Darla knew everybody. She was amazing. Stood. Darla knew everybody.
She was amazing. Later, the 2 of us took a walk, and we watched the sun come up. She talked about her journey. She was my friend. The same person, the same partner.
She hadn't changed. I had. Thanks for bringing me back, Darla. That was my absolute
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
“It looks like murder to me.” Tim Pool reviews the video and @JackPosobiec Human Events article on the intention behind the NHL tragedy. https://t.co/PV5P3qtwXA
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a tweet by Jack Posobiec about a hockey incident involving Matt Petgrave and Adam Johnson. The speaker reads a post from Reddit defending Petgrave against accusations of murder. They argue that while Petgrave may have raised his leg, it was not with the intention to seriously harm or kill Johnson. The speaker then compares this incident to other cases where people unintentionally caused harm and cried in court. They also show a video clip of the incident, highlighting Petgrave raising his leg and hitting Johnson in the neck. The speaker acknowledges that this incident is a major topic of debate and personally sees it as resembling murder.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first thing I wanna do is I'm gonna show you this. Jack Posobiec has this tweet in the article. He says, read this to the end. Let's read it. So this is a post, I believe, that was on, Reddit, and it says, to all the people calling Matt Petgrave a murderer, if you seriously think Matt Petgrave murdered Adam Johnson, go f yourself.
The guy was bawling his eyes out on the ice and in the dressing room, and probably still is right now. He's going to have to live with this for the rest of his life, and the last thing he needs is people calling him a murderer. The claim that he purposely kicked his leg up has some merit and is a possibility, but to say that he meant to seriously hurt or kill Adam Johnson is pathetic and disgusting. If he did purposefully put his leg out, He did so to get in the way of or block Adam Johnson from making progress as the puck carrier, not to slice his neck open. His foot clearly clipped the skate of another player, causing him to lose balance, so even if he did kick his leg out, he had very little control over where his leg was going.
Now notice, they say It has merit that he raised his leg, but he didn't intend to do it. Perhaps the man, Petgrave, was bawling his eyes out because he did try to kick this guy, Didn't mean to kill him, but did. Right? Mhmm. So, like, teenager is joy riding in his car and speeding, and then he crashes into someone killing him.
Is he crying his eyes out? Yes. The woman in New York City, the young woman, she pushed an old lady. Old lady fell over and died. Did she cry in court?
She sure did. Mhmm. Right. Does that mean that these people are innocent? No.
So we have, we have this video, and, let me refresh it, see if I can try and I don't want to play too much, but I'm really wants to play it all. Let's see if we can pull it up. And I don't wanna play too much, but I wanna just scroll through. You can see right here, this is, Matt Petgrave in red, highlighted, and this is Adam Johnson. And then you can see him he lifts his leg up.
There's no reason for him to raise his leg like that. In fact Why not? If he's losing his balance, the last thing he's gonna wanna do. Yeah. He raises his leg up right there, you can see it, and then hits this guy in the neck.
But, Not something we normally talk about, but this is basically the biggest story, I think, right now. Yeah. It's, like, the only thing anybody's talking about, and it's it's It's like it's causing a lot of, contentious debate, and, as someone who doesn't I played hockey when I was little, so this was like, it looks like murder to me.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Another reason why NYC is not a smart choice to start a business. https://t.co/ViDam5Ug85
Video Transcript AI Summary
In New York City, everyone is protected under the human rights law, regardless of how they identify. Employers must use the pronouns that individuals prefer, regardless of their appearance or assigned sex at birth. It is illegal to refuse to use someone's preferred pronouns or ask for medical documentation of gender-affirming care. New York City celebrates and respects pronouns every day, not just on International Pronouns Day. For more information, visit nyc.gov/dashhumanrights or call 212-416-0197.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Him, his, she, her, hers, they, them, theirs. No matter how you identify, you are protected under New York City's human rights law. Employers are required to use the pronouns that an individual Fires to be used regardless of physical appearance or sex assigned at birth. Refusal to use a person's preferred pronouns or requiring medical documentation of gender affirming care Fair is illegal and violates the city's human rights law. New York City celebrates and respects pronouns not only on International Pronouns Day, but every day of the year.
For more information, please visit n yc.gov/ dash human rights or call 212-416-0197.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
The NYC government is completely captured by the Woke ideology.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Woke = Communism https://t.co/LUgRdovFVN
Video Transcript AI Summary
I identify as a communist, abolitionist, revolutionary, intellectual, and community builder.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do you identify? Okay. I identify as a communist, abolitionist, revolutionary, intellectual community builder.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
The transgender self-imposed struggle session that Trevor Noah is undergoing here is priceless. He knows men aren’t women, squirms and squirms.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The issue of trans women and intersex women participating in women's sports is not complicated. It comes down to whether you believe they are real women or not. Policing who counts as a real woman is rooted in racism and white women's conceptions of femininity. Some argue that trans women have an unfair advantage, but there is no published research on this. Even if there is an advantage, the range of body types within the female category is much larger than anything attributed to trans women. Trans women have been competing for decades without winning elite championships or Olympic gold medals. The fear of trans women taking over women's sports is irrational and transphobic. The question of fairness can be compared to regulating performance-enhancing drugs in sports. Ultimately, if you believe trans women are women, they should be able to compete with other women.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This issue, people like to say that it's a complicated issue, and I don't actually think it is. I think it's very simple. It all boils down to, do you actually think that trans women and intersex women are real women and are really female or not? And if you do, it's very simple, just stop policing who counts as a real woman, because this has had history of racism built into it over the years. It's not an accident that the intersex athletes who get singled out are women of color from the Global South, because who gets singled out for scrutiny is based on White women's conceptions of femininity.
And that's being weaponized against trans people too. So it's a fear of protecting the fragile, weak, cis white woman from the rest of us.
Speaker 1: So there are many elements to what you said, which I appreciate. So let's try to break them down. One thing that confuses me personally is, it seems like we have discussions about who should participate in which category and how. On the face of it, it seems simple as you say. If somebody identifies as a woman, if they're transgender, they can compete against women who are born biologically and then if not, then not.
But then there are many who would argue who are not trans phobes. There are many who born biologically women who will say, but you have an unnatural advantage over me and that makes the sport unfair. How do you respond to that?
Speaker 0: Yes. There's lots of ways you can respond to that. So the first is the very language of you were born and I'm not biological somehow, like I don't think I'm a cyborg. So like this idea that like, oh, you're not a biological woman. Well, I am a woman.
That's a fact. I am female. So all my identity records, my racing license, my medical records, all say female.
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 0: And I'm pretty sure I'm made of biological stuff. So I'm a biological female as well. So this question of do trans women have an advantage over cis women? We don't know. In fact, there's basically no published research on this question.
However, there's good reason to think that there isn't, but I think it's irrelevant because we allow all kinds of competitive advantages within in women's sport. So one example I love to talk about is the 2016 Rio Olympic women's high jump final. 1st place was over 6 foot 3, 10th place was 5 foot 5. So a 10 and a half inch height difference between 1st and 10th at the Olympics in high jump. Right.
And we call that fair. So the range of body types within the female category is way, way bigger then anything that could be attributed to trans women. So if there's an advantage, and I'm not saying that there is for trans women in women's sport, it's not an unfair advantage. But also, we've been competing trying to compete at the highest level for decades. We've been allowed to compete for decades, and no one has won an elite world championship.
No one has won an Olympic gold medal. This Tokyo Olympics was the first time trans women even qualified for the Olympics. Mhmm. So this idea that trans women are suddenly gonna take over women's sport is an irrational fear of trans women, which is the dictionary definition of transphobia. So it's interesting that you say that
Speaker 1: because I think If I were to push back or, you know, even not even playing devil's advocates, there are a few things that could be argued. Number 1, you could argue that although the trans woman who competed in the Olympics didn't dominate, she did beat a field of women who might have qualified for that position, right? Secondly, when you talk about the height differences, I agree with this completely. But there are many who would argue that we exist in a state where a lot of the surgeries are new, a lot of the technology, just the technology is new. Transgenderism is not new.
We know it throughout time. We've seen it throughout history. But there are many who would say, how do we ensure that we are creating some sort of standard? And the reason the reason we talk to this is, you know, we talk about this is it's the reason they have to regulate performance enhancing drugs. For instance, what is fair?
What can you drink? What can you not drink? What can you consume? What can you not consume? Some would say, if you are born that way, that's how sport has determined who goes where.
And then some would say no, who regardless of who you are, you should be able to compete. My question then comes in from a really, honestly, a different place. I look at somebody like Oscar Pistorius from South Africa, right? He was the double amputee. And Oscar Pistorius actually went, well, I want to compete in the able-bodied race.
Right? And people like, well, did you have an advantage? Do not etcetera, etcetera, for the prosthetics. But then could there not be an argument if there is no advantage in that that then trans women should be able to compete, but in the men's races then, could they still be able to compete in the sports? But they're women and they're female.
So
Speaker 0: like I said, this boils down to are trans women really women? Are they really female? Because if you think yes, then we belong competing with other women. So
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
While a rowdy crowd tries to shout him down, he explains the links between pedophilia and Queer Theory. If you haven’t read them, you’ll be stunned to find out how brazen the intellectual leaders of QT are
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the connection between anarchism and pedophilia, but is interrupted and asked to talk about something relevant. They then play a game called "Queer Theory Pedophilia Jeopardy," where they ask questions about queer theory and pedophilia. They mention influential figures in queer theory who have supported the eradication of age of consent laws and defended pedophilia. The speaker also talks about a book by Pat Califia that discusses children's ability to make decisions about their own bodies and argues that pedophiles should be more involved in children's lives. They mention Judith Butler's controversial views on incest and conclude that no queer theorist has spoken out against pedophilia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a long correlation between anarchism and pedophilia and support for pedophilia. The Oh, wait wait wait wait wait wait wait, that's a beautiful line. Thank you so much for asking how about something relevant. I've been talking about rape culture all day and pedophilia and the support of pedophilia is not rape culture. Actually actually, it seems if you're acting like this is a spurious connection, so we're gonna play Jeopardy.
This is we're gonna play Queer theory we're gonna play Queer Theory, Pedophilia, Jeopardy! Okay, answer. Commonly called the godfather of queer theory. Okay. 100 points.
Foucault, another way to ask this is, who argued? No, I guess the answer would be argued for the eradication patient of age of consent laws as in down to infants.
Speaker 1: Who is to a co? Thank
Speaker 0: Next one. The author of the the author of the, founding documents of queer theory.
Speaker 1: Who is Gail Rubin?
Speaker 0: Who is Gail Rubin? What percentage? Don't know the answer is 50%. Question is?
Speaker 1: Amount in that article that was a defensive pedophilia specifically, quote, boy lovers. So they just talk boys. Oh.
Speaker 0: And since you're not believing me, quote quote, this is in the founding document of Queer Theory. White communists and homosexuals in 19 fifties, boy lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders of their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation. In the founding document of career theory. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm using facts.
Speaker 1: A thousand, a thousand apologies.
Speaker 0: One must never let facts in a way. Oh, she also compared by the way, she compared pedophilia she compared pedophilia 2, a preference for spicy food. The thing is I have never heard of anyone who has to have years therapy because they ate
Speaker 1: hot and sour soup.
Speaker 0: Okay, short for 200. Now it is, now it is now it is pedophilia and queer theory for 300, that would be author of, Macho Sluts. Author of Macho Sluts and Public Sex. Pat Phillipia. Wait, wait, wait.
What was it somebody said? Stay relevant.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk
Speaker 0: let's talk about, Pat Califia Okay. Here's something from 1 of, Pat Philippius books You know, it's really interesting. It's really interesting that when I actually start talking about the relationship relationship between queer theory and anarchism and pedophilia that, it becomes they they really want to shut me up now. So here's Pat Califia. They want to
Speaker 1: get coffee. You're a host host.
Speaker 0: Pat Califia.
Speaker 1: Oh, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Just a second.
Just a second.
Speaker 0: I was accused of homophobia because I am against pedophilia.
Speaker 1: Yes. Right. Who is it who actually makes the connections? Could you not?
Speaker 0: Okay. Here's something by Pat Califia. Pat Califia has written, any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks, or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone's lap, engagement in sexual activity by which she does not mean play doctors. She means with adults. She's very clear about that because she also says that, pedophile should be more and not less, invested in children's lives.
Okay. So we're at 300. 400 is, the most famous, queer theorist of today. Answer Judith. No.
It is not Judith Butler. It's who is judge Judith Butler? Okay, Judith Butler is the most famous queer theorist of the day
Speaker 1: incest is
Speaker 0: a violation suggesting I think there may be occasions, which it's not. Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic and which or which gain their traumatic character by virtue of the conscious of social saying produce. Yeah. That's true.
That's one of that's one of the queer heroes. Okay. Now now we have we have, for 500, we have, the last 1 in the Queer Theory and Pedophilia. The answer is queer theorist who has spoken out strongly against pedophilia
Speaker 1: 0. 0. Who is no one?
Speaker 0: Who is no one? Not a single one. Because the entire thing is based on transgressing. Yeah. I know, dear fucking god.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Woke educators want to teach two year olds “pleasure based” sex ed. to fight racism.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that if parents support pleasure-based sex education from a young age, it would make teaching sex education in middle and high school easier. They see this as the future and the right approach. They also mention that comprehensive sex education should be integrated into every subject and that social justice education is a crucial part of it. The speaker feels that there is momentum to bring about comprehensive sex education, with the help of organizations like Amaze, and to move towards an anti-racist, pleasure-based activism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, I think I know I'm speaking is, like, quiet here, but I mean pleasure. If we can get parents to be on board that pleasure based sex ed with their pre k or even earlier is the way to do this, it would be so much easier for us middle school and high school sex educators to teach because we're not spending time teaching them to unlearn all the things they've been wrongly socialized to to, you know, subscribe to. I feel like that's the future. The optimism he says it is. It's totally the right way to go.
And it really becomes the actual holistic sex positive comprehensive, field that we all on this panel know it to be, the best comprehensive health education is one that is integrated into every subject. That social justice education has always been a part of sex education when it's done right. And so I feel like we have this momentum to really bring about comprehensive sex ed in the ways that Amaze is producing and helping us with, because these movements are really pushing us to move more forward into that anti racist pleasure based type of activism.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
The dimwits that evaluate DEI statements decide who is a good mathematician in CA. @ConceptualJames and @jordanbpeterson on the DEI capture of STEM in California.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 75% of new applicants to STEM positions at the University of California State Systems have their applications ignored due to insufficient DEI statements. This alarming statistic highlights the replacement of years of hard work and expertise with a simple statement. The evaluation of these statements is left to individuals who may not possess the necessary qualifications. The suggestion of using chat TPT to automate the writing process is met with skepticism and humor. Overall, this situation is seen as a concerning and unfortunate development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is happening. Now look look at our medical journals. Oh, yeah. Well, they say 75%. This is so horrible.
75% of new applicants to STEM positions at the University of California State Systems have their applications, their research dossiers are unread because the DEI statements aren't sufficient. 75%. That's an astonishing number. It is something it is something to behold, Troy would smile down on this. That's for sure.
That's for sure. Talk about a coup. So that you can replace those decades of work that it takes to become, say, a PhD in something difficult like mathematics. And you can reduce that to a DEI statement. And then you can let the dimwits who evaluate DEI statements decide which mathematicians get to practice math.
That's right. It's like, oh my god. And now the DEI statement will be written by chat Yeah. Right. Trick everybody.
Right. Right. Right. Well, maybe we maybe you technical types have come up with a solution to the DEI problem. Yeah.
Just get chat TPT to write the statements. Yeah. We're lucky to do it. You've automated you've automated the compliance process. Oh, yeah.
That's pretty damn funny. Yeah. You know, horrible, horrible way.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Why isn’t the media covering the fact that Daniel Penny was complemented by other passengers and also put Jordan Neely in the recovery position? Seems like key details to leave out.
@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed
Woke professor admits Woke and Communism are the same thing. A day before the Riley Gaines protest, San Francisco State University posted a talk entitled “How to use the campus as a site for revolutionary struggle”.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the efforts made in the past to unite Americans against communism, which is now referred to as "woke." They mention that during that time, there was a push for everyone to pledge loyalty to the country as it was. They also mention that Mexican workers were derogatorily referred to as "wetbacks."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of trying to consolidate a conformity among the American people, in in opposition to what was called communism in those days. Today, it's called woke, but in those days, it was called communism. And the idea was to set a certain kind of pattern or standard that everyone had to take a loyalty oath to this country as it stood. As it stood, Mexican workers would call wetbacks. That was as it stood.