TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Nas_tech

Posted - August 11, 2025 at 4:26 PM

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 2:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Tulsi Gabbard's recent interview has sparked significant attention, revealing a coordinated effort by the Obama administration to manipulate the narrative surrounding the 2016 election. She declassified over 100 documents, asserting "irrefutable evidence" that officials directed intelligence agencies to create a false narrative post-Trump's victory. Key meetings and assessments were manipulated, with dissenting intelligence suppressed. Gabbard has referred potential criminal charges to the DOJ, which has announced an investigation, suggesting the protective shield around Obama's administration may be weakening.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s interview has gone viral. Tulsi Gabbard just exposed Obama’s real 2016 election scheme. It wasn’t only about Russia. It was bigger. Coordinated. And aimed at overthrowing an election. Here’s the full story (before it disappears): 🧵 https://t.co/cgkwhHSmkr

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified over 100 documents on the 2016 Russia investigation. Her conclusion: "Irrefutable evidence" that Obama administration officials directed intelligence agencies to create a false narrative after Trump's victory. https://t.co/ZZlKMWLBH2

Video Transcript AI Summary

We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

December 9, 2016: Obama convenes emergency National Security Council meeting. Attendees: CIA Director Brennan, DNI Clapper, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, and Loretta Lynch. Within hours, Clapper's assistant emails intelligence leaders: Create new assessment "per the President's request."

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2016, nobody believed it possible for Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. When he did, it seems president Obama just couldn't take it. He convened in 12/09/2016 meeting in the White House Situation Room just weeks after Hillary Clinton conceded. He ordered an ICA or intelligence community assessment to functionally attribute Trump's unexpected win to the doings of Vladimir Putin. That Obama ordered phony assessment was about politics, not national security or the truth.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In 2016, nobody believed it possible for Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. When he did, it seems president Obama just couldn't take it. He convened in 12/09/2016 meeting in the White House Situation Room just weeks after Hillary Clinton conceded. He ordered an ICA or intelligence community assessment to functionally attribute Trump's unexpected win to the doings of Vladimir Putin. That Obama ordered phony assessment was about politics, not national security or the truth.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Here's the timeline: December 7: Talking points prepared stating "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks to alter the US Presidential election outcome." December 9: Obama's secret meeting. January 6, 2017: New assessment directly contradicts all prior findings. https://t.co/JKHSsIdgu0

Video Transcript AI Summary

We have found the evidence that proves that this Obama led intelligence community assessment was a contrived document, that was knowingly made using a fake intelligence or substandard intelligence in order to drive this, conclusion that president Obama wanted to see, which was that Russia helped Donald Trump get elected in 2016 or at least aspire to. This directly contradicted every other intelligence community assessment, every other assessment that came from the intelligence community for the last several months prior, both before the twenty sixteen election as well as immediate, immediately after.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We have found the evidence that proves that this Obama led intelligence community assessment was a contrived document, that was knowingly made using a fake intelligence or substandard intelligence in order to drive this, conclusion that president Obama wanted to see, which was that Russia helped Donald Trump get elected in 2016 or at least aspire to. This directly contradicted every other intelligence community assessment, every other assessment that came from the intelligence community for the last several months prior, both before the twenty sixteen election as well as immediate, immediately after.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

For months before the election, the Intelligence Community consistently assessed Russia was "probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means." But Obama needed a different story. So they manufactured one.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

CIA Director Brennan forced inclusion of the discredited Steel Dossier despite senior officials' objections. When confronted about its flaws, Brennan reportedly said: "Yes, but doesn't it ring true?" A CIA officer testified: "DCIA refused to remove it" and "overruled their objections."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Intelligence was deliberately suppressed that contradicted the narrative. Reliable sources showed Russian officials were "planning for candidate Clinton's victory." Others assessed "neither Trump nor Clinton" would respect Russian interests.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

A draft Presidential Daily Brief from December 8, 2016 stated Russia "did not impact recent U.S. election results." It was pulled hours before publication due to "new guidance." The truth was literally suppressed in real-time.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

An ODNI whistleblower who worked for Clapper refused to participate. He was "sidelined and cut out" for not playing along. He tried reporting through proper channels: Inspector General, Congress, DOJ. "He never got calls back. They were not interested," Gabbard revealed. https://t.co/4Lj0dTHfXs

Video Transcript AI Summary

From a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. "As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this." "He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team." "He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle." "He raised this through the ICIG." "He raised this, tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner." "He never got calls back." "They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced." "He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused." "No action." "They were not interested in taking action in this."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The second thing is I can speak from a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this. He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team. He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle. He raised this through the ICIG. He raised this tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner. He never got calls back. They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced. He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused. No action. They were not interested in taking action in this.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The final Intelligence Community Assessment was created by only 5 CIA analysts—"unlike routine IC analysis." The entire conclusion rested on "one scant, unclear and unverifiable fragment" from a substandard report. This became the foundation for years of investigations.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Tulsi Gabbard at the White House: "There is irrefutable evidence that President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence assessment that they knew was false." She referred potential criminal charges to DOJ. https://t.co/ePr3U0vM0C

Video Transcript AI Summary

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016. They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of president Trump and launching what would be a years long coup against him and his administration.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

DOJ confirmed receipt and announced a "strike force" to investigate. Pam Bondi: "We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice." The protective shield around Obama's administration may finally be cracking.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

All information above represents direct quotes from Gabbard's statements, official DNI releases, and confirmed DOJ announcements. Declassified documents available on DNI website

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @Nas_tech_AI for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can.

@Nas_tech_AI — Nas

Posted - August 9, 2025 at 1:58 PM

Saved - August 10, 2025 at 12:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Trump recently held a significant White House briefing with Pam Bondi, announcing major changes that enhance his power. Key points include a ruling that limits federal judges' ability to block his policies nationwide, allowing him to bypass previous injunctions. Parents can now opt their children out of LGBTQ content, and federal funding for transgender surgeries has been halted. Trump has also arrested over 2,700 gang members, cut federal funding to sanctuary cities, secured U.S. mineral rights through a peace deal, and taken a hard stance on Iran. Birthright citizenship is set for Supreme Court review, and Trump can now advance his agenda without judicial delays.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Trump just held his largest White House briefing yet. Alongside Pam Bondi, he dropped a series of announcements and some strong hints about what’s next for America. President Trump is now more powerful than ever. Everyone should read these biggest changes. A thread 🧵 https://t.co/R7Q4PQK5zJ

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

1/ Federal judges can no longer block Trump nationwide Before, 1 liberal judge in California could stop Trump's policies for all 50 states. Now, that judge's ruling only affects their local district. Trump called this "a monumental victory for the Constitution." https://t.co/finXkguIrH

Video Transcript AI Summary

This morning, the Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law in striking down the excessive use of nation wide injunctions to interfere with the normal functioning of the executive branch. The Supreme Court has stopped the presidency itself. That's what they've done. And, really, it's been it's been an amazing period of time this last hour. There are people elated all over the country. I've seen such such happiness and spirit. Sometimes you don't see that, but this case is very important. I was elected on a historic mandate.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This morning, the Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law in striking down the excessive use of nation wide injunctions to interfere with the normal functioning of the executive branch. The Supreme Court has stopped the presidency itself. That's what they've done. And, really, it's been it's been an amazing period of time this last hour. There are people elated all over the country. I've seen such such happiness and spirit. Sometimes you don't see that, but this case is very important. I was elected on a historic mandate.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

2/ The shocking truth about who's been blocking Trump Pam Bondi revealed that of 40 nationwide injunctions against Trump, 35 came from just 5 districts: Maryland, DC, Massachusetts, California, Washington. 94 districts total. But 5 controlled everything. https://t.co/JXGeJhlPUF

Video Transcript AI Summary

Impact today. As I said, it's it's now it's case by case. Let me reiterate. Of the 35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions filed against this president against his executive authority as president of The United States, 35 of them came from Maryland, DC, Massachusetts, California, Washington. I mean that's crazy. The these five districts. So, yes, it indirectly impacts us. It will be a separate decision in October.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Impacted today. As I said, it's it's now it's case by case. Let me reiterate. Of the 35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions filed against this president against his executive authority as president of The United States, 35 of them came from Maryland, DC, Massachusetts, California, Washington. I mean, that's crazy. The these five districts. So, yes, it indirectly impacts us. It will be a separate decision in October.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

3/ Parents can now opt kids out of transgender content The Supreme Court ruled: Parents can pull their kids from classes with LGBTQ materials. Trump: "Parents lost control of their child. This gives it back." What are your thoughts? Controversial or common sense? https://t.co/XKF97GOx50

Video Transcript AI Summary

This is a big subject. "In a certain way, this might be bigger than trade." "Trade, mister president? I think this is bigger than trade." The transgender ruling: "Sir, on the transgender ruling, the supreme court ruling that parents with religious objections can pull their kids out of public school lessons that use LGBTQ materials." The president replies: "I think the ruling was a great ruling, and I think it's a great ruling for parents. They lost control of the schools. They lost control of their child, and, this is a tremendous victory for parents." "And I'm not surprised by it, but I am surprised that it went this far. It took us to bring life back to normal. So so wonderful. It's parental. And I kept saying, we will give you back your parental rights." "Mister president"

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Why don't we keep it on this subject? This is such a big subject. You know what? Trade is so big, but this I don't know. In a certain way, this might be bigger than trade. Trade, mister president? I think this is bigger than trade. Yes. Please. Go ahead. Wondering, if you could Go ahead. Speaker 1: Sir, on the transgender ruling, the supreme court ruling that parents with religious objections can pull their kids out of public school lessons that use LGBTQ materials. Pam brought it up. Speaker 0: Your reaction to that ruling today, sir. I think the ruling was a great ruling, and I think it's a great ruling for parents. It's really a ruling for parents. They they lost control of the schools. They lost control of their child, and, this is a tremendous victory for parents. And I'm not surprised by it, but I am surprised that it went this far. It took us to bring life back to normal. So so wonderful. It's parental. And I kept saying, we will give you back your parental rights. They were taken away, and this is a tremendous victory for parents. Yeah. Speaker 1: Mister president

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

4/ No more taxpayer-funded transgender surgeries Trump can now stop federal money going towards gender transitions. Again, previously blocked by courts. Unlocked by Trump. Tax dollars won't fund these procedures anymore. Sound fair? https://t.co/UmjGCptTOD

Video Transcript AI Summary

Decision we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous other priorities of the American people. We have

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Decision we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous other priorities of the American people. We have

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

5/ They've arrested 2,711 TDA gang members TDA = one of the world's most violent gangs. Biden let them walk into America freely. Trump has arrested 2,711 so far. Bondi: "You should all feel safer now." https://t.co/tl942B5LtA

Video Transcript AI Summary

If you have an undocumented baby, would that baby then be an enforcement priority? The violent criminals in our country are the priority now. Today marked the two thousand seven hundred and eleventh arrest in our country of TDA members, just TDA. They are one of the most violent criminal organizations in the world, and the Biden administration let them walk into our country walk into our country for the last four years. 2,711 of them today have been arrested in our country. That is the priority of Donald Trump. That is the priority of this country, of homeland security, of all of our lawyers, of FBI. That will be discussed in October when the supreme court hopefully rules in our favor, and we're very confident of that. But you should all feel safer now that president Trump can deport all of these all of these gangs, and not one district court judge can think they're an emperor over this administration and his executive powers and why the people of The United States elected him.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Nation. If you have an undocumented baby, would that baby then be an enforcement priority? The violent criminals in our country are the priority now. Let me put it in perspective. Today marked the two thousand seven hundred and eleventh arrest in our country of TDA members, just TDA. Everyone in this room agrees. They are one of the most violent criminal organizations in the world, and the Biden administration let them walk into our country walk into our country for the last four years. 2,711 of them today have been arrested in our country. That is the priority of Donald Trump. That is the priority of this country, of homeland security, of all of our lawyers, of FBI. That's the priority. That will be discussed in October when the supreme court hopefully rules in our favor, and we're very confident of that. But you should all feel safer now that president Trump can deport all of these all of these gangs, and not one district court judge can think they're an emperor over this administration and his executive powers and why the people of The United States elected him.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

6/ Sanctuary cities lose ALL federal funding Liberal judges previously blocked this... But now, Trump can cut every penny. For Example, California gets "nothing" if it keeps protecting illegal immigrants. The money tap just turned off. https://t.co/ycw1yjeEEl

Video Transcript AI Summary

Discusses cutting funds in sanctuary states like California, accusing them of supporting illegal immigration and distributing pork, and says, 'we're giving them a hard time.' He claims California has 'a man that wants to give away everything to people that nobody's seen before.' On Los Angeles, he advocates strong action, including military and National Guard involvement, calling it 'upheld by the Supreme Court' and suggesting the city would otherwise deteriorate. He asserts 'They lost 25,000 houses in a fight. They should've lost none.' He recalls sending water down and breaking into their water supply because they refused to supply it, calling them 'crazy' and asserting they 'routed all the water out into the Pacific Ocean for environmental reasons.' He says he will 'work with governors' and with Democrats to 'make it good for everybody,' and that 'just about all cities with heavy crime are run by Democrat.'

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are you gonna cut funds in the sanctuary states, like, for instance, California, that keep supporting illegal immigration and then distribute pork and Speaker 1: Yeah. We're giving them a hard time. Speaker 0: And also, if if a foreign policy question Speaker 1: They they don't have a governor in California. They have a man that wants to give away everything to people that nobody's seen before. If we didn't go into Los Angeles with the military, which did a fantastic job, but if we didn't go in to Los Angeles, bringing in the National Guard I would have brought the military if it was necessary because you have to. We have the right to. That was another thing upheld by the Supreme Court. But if we didn't go in with the National Guard and be strong and tough, you wouldn't maybe have a Los Angeles. It would be like the rest of California, the rest of Los Angeles. They lost 25,000 how houses in a fight. They should've lost none. You know, I sent the water down. I had to break into their water supply because they just refused to do it. They're crazy. There's something wrong with them. They have plenty of water. They don't have droughts or anything. They have we let it come down from the Pacific Northwest. They routed all the water out into the Pacific Ocean for environmental reasons. Okay? And now you have 25,000 houses, none of which would have burned down if you had the water. They didn't have water. They didn't have water for the fire pumps. They didn't have water in the sprinkler systems that people put in. So the answer is we're gonna work with governors. We're gonna work with radical left Democrats and Democrats, and we're gonna make it good for everybody. We'll have to stop the crime in those or in in the case of the cities, I think I can say just about all cities with heavy crime are run by Democrat.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

7/ Trump secured US mineral rights through an African peace deal He brokered peace between Rwanda and Congo after years of war. The price for US involvement? "We're getting a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo." Strategic resources secured. https://t.co/REVpyatqv5

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 congratulates on that treaty and says, "That's gonna take place today at 03:00 in the Oval Office. We're gonna have a signing with Rwanda and The Congo." Speaker 1 notes that Rwanda and Congo "were going at it for many years and with machetes. It is one of the worst one of the worst wars that anyone's ever seen," and adds, "I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled. I mean, just a brilliant person who is very comfortable in that part of the world." He asks, "Are you uncomfortable there?" and replies, "No." He adds, "That's the part of the world that I know. Very comfortable." He says they "were able to get them together and sell it" and that "not only that, we're getting for The United States, a lot of the mineral rights from The Congo as part of it." They are "honored to be here" and "they never thought they'd be coming to the White House," and "they're so honored." "That's at 03:00, I believe."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Congratulations. A couple of very different questions. One is Rwanda 1994. As you you grew up in New York, we all knew how horrific those attacks were. Congratulations on that treaty. There are talks that perhaps Speaker 1: That's gonna take place today at 03:00 in the Oval Office. We're gonna have a signing with Rwanda and The Congo. I have a follow-up. So I I'm a little bit out of my league in that one because I didn't know too much about it. I knew one thing. They were going at it for many years and with machetes. It is one of the worst one of the worst wars that anyone's ever seen. And I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled. I mean, just a brilliant person who is very comfortable in that part of the world. It's a very dangerous part of the world. They said, you uncomfortable there? People are being dead killed. Schoolchildren are being raided and killed. And I don't even wanna say how, but as viciously as I've ever heard, are you uncomfortable? No. That's the part of the world that I know. Very comfortable. Was able to get them together and sell it. And not only that, we're getting for The United States, a lot of the mineral rights from The Congo as part of it. They're so honored to be here. They never thought they'd be coming to look. This is a very tough part of the world. They never thought they were just telling me they never thought they'd ever be coming to the White House, and they're so honored. And so we're gonna give them a great big reception, but that's after many years of fighting. It's a great thing. That's at 03:00, I believe.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

8/ Iran faces Trump's hardest line yet Asked if he'd bomb Iran again: "Without question. Absolutely." His demands? • Surrender ALL nuclear materials • Zero uranium production • Full inspection access No wiggle room. https://t.co/Hu2FcbcX2E

Video Transcript AI Summary

They used birthright citizenship, some of the worst people, some of the cartels to get people into our country, just so you know. He references 'the end day, was it 1869 or whatever, but you take that exact day, that's when the case was filed, and the case ended shortly thereafter' and says, 'This has to do with the babies of slaves very, very obviously.' He adds, 'I think we're gonna win.' The speaker argues 'they've used it,' and 'the cartels have used birthright citizenship to get very bad people in' and cites 'Pam's doing and what Todd and everybody else what they're doing at DOJ and all over, FBI, ICE, border patrol' as 'incredible people' trying to keep the country safe. He concludes that 'This is just another way that they get illegal immigrants into our into our country, and in some cases, very, very bad one.'

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You know, they used birthright citizenship, some of the worst people, some of the cartels to get people into our country, just so you know. And again, I say, if you look at the end of the civil war, the eighteen hundreds, it was a a very turbulent time. If you take the end day, was it 1869 or whatever, but you take that exact day, that's when the case was filed, and the case ended shortly thereafter. This has to do with the babies of slaves very, very obviously. And I I think we're gonna win. People didn't I don't think they went about discussing it right. I came along and we we looked and we said, wait a minute. This is wrong. We've been looking at birthright citizenship wrong for years. But they've used it. The cartels have used birthright citizenship to get very bad people in and what Pam's doing and what Todd and everybody else what they're doing at DOJ and all over, FBI, ICE, border patrol. These are incredible people. They're trying to keep our country safe, and they don't wanna have people come in. This is just another way that they get illegal immigrants into our into our country, and in some cases, very, very bad one.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

9/ Birthright citizenship heads to the Supreme Court "It was for babies of slaves, not people scamming the system on vacation." The matter goes to Court in October. If Trump wins, millions lose their automatic citizenship. His most controversial move yet. Are you with him? https://t.co/0QxRyBEe6K

Video Transcript AI Summary

parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside of the process that they're using to get this through. Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of the parliamentarian? And what have you personally done in the last forty eight hours to try and get Republican senators who are against the bill to a yes? 'If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%. Think of that. 68, a record, the highest in the history.' 'The Democrats won't approve it only because, politically, it's so good for the Republicans.' 'They're not approving border security.' 'We've done a great job at the border, but we have to add some wall.' 'We have no money for that.' 'But if the Democrats it'll be interesting to see if we get any Democrat votes. We should.' 'If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and so many other things that are common sense.'

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Please go ahead. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister president. On your tax bill, if I could for a moment, senators are racing to rewrite parts of it right now after the senate parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside of the process that they're using to get this through. Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of the parliamentarian? And what have you personally done in the last forty eight hours to try and get Republican senators who are against the bill to a yes? Speaker 0: Well, look, it's a great bill. It's a massive tax cut. If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%. Think of that. 68, a record, the highest in the history. The Democrats won't approve it only because, politically, it's so good for the Republicans. The Democrats aren't approving it. But think of what they're not approving. They're not approving border security. We've done a great job at the border, but we have to add some wall. We have to do, you know, various things. We have no money for that. We have no money for the border. We have no money for so many things. But if the Democrats it'll be interesting to see if we get any Democrat votes. We should. If I were a Democrat, I would absolute maybe Fetterman because he seems to be the most sensible one lately. If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and so many other things that are common sense. They're basic things.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

10/ The real bombshell: Trump can now do EVERYTHING at once With nationwide injunctions gone, he can simultaneously: • End birthright citizenship • Restrict immigration • Build the wall No more delays. But the genius move? https://t.co/VJXtnkbrnA

Video Transcript AI Summary

But I wanna just thank again the Supreme Court for this ruling. It's a giant. It's a giant. Thank you, president Trump. Thank you for fighting for all Americans. Americans are finally getting what they voted for. No longer will we have rogue judges striking down president Trump's policies across the entire nation. No longer. Today in the six three opinion, justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions. These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court. As the supreme court held today, they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But I wanna just thank again the Supreme Court for this ruling. It's a giant. It's a giant. And they should be very proud, and our country should be very proud of the Supreme Court today. And with that, I'd like you to listen to the words of Pam Bondi. She's an incredible attorney general. We're very proud of her. And, as you know, Todd Blanche is with us, and we have so many others that worked on this case and other cases. And I think they're doing a great job. Pam, please say a few words. Speaker 1: Thank you, president Trump. Thank you for fighting for all Americans. Americans are finally getting what they voted for. No longer will we have rogue judges striking down president Trump's policies across the entire nation. No longer. Today in the six three opinion, justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions. These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court. As the supreme court held today, they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

11/ Trump didn't just win one case. He eliminated the single tool blocking his entire agenda. Liberal judges can't stop him anymore. "Americans are finally getting what they voted for." But the best bit was still to come... https://t.co/hUbXD9fYwt

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 thanked the Supreme Court for the ruling, calling it a giant and stating the country should be proud, as he credited Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche and others who worked on the case, then asked Bondi to say a few words. Speaker 1: "Thank you president Trump. Thank you for fighting for all Americans. Americans are finally getting what they voted for. No longer will we have rogue judges striking down president Trump's policies across the entire nation. No longer." "Today in the six three opinion, justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions. These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court. As the supreme court held today, they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @Nas_tech_AI for more content on AI and politics. Appreciate the support.

@Nas_tech_AI — Nas

Posted - August 8, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Saved - August 8, 2025 at 8:41 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

RFK Jr. aims to lead a $1T healthcare revolution as HHS Secretary, focusing on chronic disease and health crises in America. His MAHA plan includes food system reform, environmental toxin reduction, pharmaceutical accountability, and healthcare transparency. He highlights alarming health statistics, such as rising chronic disease rates and healthcare costs. RFK Jr. emphasizes the need for informed choice in health options and plans to investigate environmental triggers for conditions like autism. His legal background aims to enforce regulations effectively.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

RFK Jr. Is Leading Trump’s $1T Health Revolution In 2018, he exposed Big Pharma’s decades of data manipulation. Now, as HHS Secretary, his MAHA movement is set to transform U.S. healthcare forever. Here’s why Trump picked him: A thread 🧵 https://t.co/cboCdAQV4h

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

First, some context: RFK Jr. was an environmental lawyer fighting pollution. In 2016, he shifted to what he calls "the greatest epidemic of chronic disease in history." What he found about our health crisis shocked him. https://t.co/uYDgqjxWgI

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 1980, Speaker 1 began reevaluating their life, solidifying this career choice after their father's death when they were 14. Prior to that, they wanted to be a veterinarian, but felt pressure to pursue a path similar to their father's. Instead of veterinary school, they went to law school, following his path to Harvard and the University of Virginia, and became an attorney and prosecutor like him. In 1984, after personal difficulties, they reassessed their life and decided to pursue their passion for the environment. After getting sober, which they have been for twelve years, they integrated their legal knowledge with their environmental interests.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When did your life turn around and you decide, okay, I'm gonna go for this environmental law thing. I'm really gonna make a difference. When did you Speaker 1: In '84. '19 well, 1980 and then '83, I was kinda reevaluating my life. And and, you know, I kinda made it a career choice after my father died because when I which happened when I was 14. And I had wanted to prior to that, I'd always wanted to be a veterinarian. But I think I felt some pressure from for variety of reasons to to sort of change my career to try to do more what the kind of thing that he was trying to do. And I ended up rather than going to veterinary school, going to law school and really followed his career path. I went to Harvard and then to University of Virginia which he had done. And then I became an attorney and a prosecutor, which was kind of what my father had been doing. In 1984, I went through a lot of personal difficulties, and I really reassessed my life and said, Speaker 0: was a I'm show drug time that people knew about and I was proud of you because I saw you go through that and I thought, boy, lot of people don't turn it around. How did you turn it around? Speaker 1: I, you know, I did what I was supposed to do. And I, you know, I've been sober now for twelve years. And I, so, and I, at that time, I was reevaluating my life and and I, and just decided to do what I wanted to do which was, had always been the environment. And I I integrated a lot of the, you know, the stuff that I had learned with law school into, you know, my my my initial interest in the environment.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The current health statistics are staggering: • 6 in 10 American adults have chronic disease • Autism rates: 1/36 (it was 1/10,000 in the 1960s) • 38% of teens diabetic or pre-diabetic • Americans spend 2X more for worse outcomes And the story gets worse: https://t.co/POj7ZaIlG8

Video Transcript AI Summary

Working with governors in 24 states to advance MAHA legislation, aiming to remove soda from the SNAP program. Operation Stork Speed is underway to eliminate harmful chemicals from baby formula. Efforts are focused on improving school lunch programs by removing food dyes and other detrimental chemicals, which allegedly impact academic performance, school violence, and mental and physical health. Collaborating with governors to implement cell to cell legislation, restricting cell phone use in schools to improve academic performance. A significant reduction in animal testing at NIH and the FDA has been announced, transitioning to AI for more precise identification of toxic impacts. Partnering with Elon to streamline operations across health agencies, aligning with the goal of making America healthy again.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Working with Brooke on and governors now in 24 states who are advancing MAHA legislation to get soda pops off of the food stamp program off the SNAP program. We've launched operation stork speed to get the bad chemicals out of baby formula. We're working with governors across the country to get good food into the school lunch programs and to get rid of food chemical dyes and other bad chemicals that are in our food. We've shown now that this directly affects academic performance, violence in the schools, and mental health, as well as physical health. We are working with governors across the country to get cell to cell or bell to bell legislation to restrict the use of cell phones in schools, which again dramatically impacts academic performance. Today, we announced a dramatic reduction in animal testing at NIH and the FDA. We're gonna switch over to AI, which we've now found is much more precise in identifying the impacts of toxics in various products. We're working with the Elon who's done an incredible job to eliminate the redundancies and to streamline operations at all the health agencies and to recalibrate our trajectory to your agenda of making America healthy again.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

When RFK Jr. was young, chronic disease affected just 6% of Americans. Cost to treat these conditions? Zero. Today, 60% have at least one chronic condition. Annual cost? $1.3 TRILLION. RFK Jr. claims he knows why... https://t.co/SSNdhDu5eb

Video Transcript AI Summary

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child because it all of these entities are making money on them. The insurance companies, the hospitals, the the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical companies have a lifetime annuities. I mean, any child that and the earlier that kid is sick, they don't wanna kill him. They want him sick for the rest of their lives. And we have now a whole generation. When my uncle was president, six percent of Americans had chronic disease today at sixty percent. When my uncle was president, do you know what the cause the annual cause of treating chronic disease was in this country? Zero. There weren't even any drugs invented for it. Zero. Today, it's about $4,300,000,000,000. When your uncle was president And none of it is necessary. What was the autism rate in 1960? Do we have In 1960, the autism rate there's about four, five studies, and the highest rate, say about one in twenty five hundred, one in fifteen hundred, one in twenty five hundred, one in ten thousand. Oh, so that, you know, it was it was somewhere between one in fifteen hundred and one in ten thousand. Today, it's one in every thirty four kids according to the CDC. And in some states, like California, I think maybe Utah and New Jersey, one at twenty two. One in twenty two kids. And, you know, these kids should be healthy. These kids shouldn't be our our highest performing kids, and they instead are are you know, have this extraordinary disability that's gonna keep them dependent and not you know, a lot of these if you're full blown autism, you know, it's a nonverbal, non toilet trained, head banging, stimming, toe walking. These are kids that will never throw a baseball, They'll never graduate high school. They'll never go out and take a girl on a date. They'll never use the toilet alone. They'll they'll never write a play. They'll never write a poem. They'll never vote.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

RFK Jr's MAHA plan has 4 pillars: • Food system reform • Environmental toxin reduction • Pharmaceutical accountability • Healthcare transparency Let's break down each one: https://t.co/QqeE6Rptcv

Video Transcript AI Summary

The plan to make America healthy again is multifaceted, involving hundreds of actions. NIH needs gold standard science and transparency, including replicating studies and publishing raw data. The plan involves creating new journals independent of pharmaceutical industry control. The FDA needs to regulate food by examining chemicals, not just bacteria, and abolishing the GRAS standard.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And how how are you gonna roll out making America healthy again? Yeah. We've mapped out a game plan. We share it. Well, you know, it's multifaceted. I mean, there's hundreds of things that we have to do. Yeah. Each of the agencies, NIH needs to have gold standard science and gold standard transparency. We need to replicate studies. We need to publish raw data. We need to get away from the traditional journals which are controlled by the pharmaceutical industry and create our own journals which we're going to do. You have to create your own journals. We're gonna create our own How that Well, we're gonna we we have that we're gonna do that. That's gonna get done. So these are the kind of specifics I think people really wanna know. I know. I wanna know. Yeah. Mean, that'll get done very And then FDA needs to start regulating food again and saying, you know, not just that when food is adulterated, there's bacteria in it, let's look at the chemicals in it. Let's stop using the GRAS standard, which we're abolishing.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The food reform is gaining momentum: • West Virginia banning harmful food dyes in schools • SNAP waivers removing taxpayer-subsidized soda • Ending the "GRAS" loophole allowing untested additives • Supporting local food production Europe allows 400 additives. The US? 10,000 https://t.co/jORvJikXvH

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asks if there's a plan to address food additives from the top down, rather than state by state. The other speaker says one of the first groups they met with after being sworn in was major food processors and producers. The meeting went very well, and the speaker believes these companies see the "writing on the wall." Food dyes are considered the most egregious additives because they aren't used in other countries and are associated with cancers, behavioral issues, and neurological diseases like ADHD. The speaker claims these companies often make the same products with vegetable dyes in Canada, Mexico, and Europe.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You you've told me earlier today that in places like Europe, they simply don't have these kind of additives. So I would love if you would share if there is a plan to sort of get it from the top down to speak to the food companies and say, how can we get it out of the food so that we don't have Speaker 1: to go state by Speaker 0: state by state and get it out through legislation? I Speaker 1: mean, you know, one of the first groups I met with when I came in when I was after I was sworn in was the were the big food companies, all of the major food processors and producers in this country. Speaker 0: How'd that go? Speaker 1: And it went very well. And I think they're at the point where they see the writing on the wall. And, you know, one of the things I said is that the food dyes are kind of the most egregious because they don't use them in any other country. They they're clearly associated with a variety a a grim inventory of diseases, including cancers and behavioral disease and neurological disease like ADHD. And it's very, very well documented. And and they're making, in many cases, the same products in this country that have those dyes, then they use vegetable dyes in Canada, Mexico, and Europe.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The food industry followed Big Tobacco's playbook. "By 1994, the two biggest food companies were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris." "They put 10,000 scientists to work making food addictive, just like they did with cigarettes." But food is just one part of the crisis. https://t.co/Wr3zSngUvx

Video Transcript AI Summary

The processed food industry has discovered methods to make food addictive while removing its nutritional value. People are addicted to the synthesized taste of these foods, which lack nutrients. The result is consumption of unhealthy food filled with laboratory-created chemicals that the body is not designed to metabolize.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The industry itself, the processed food industry, has figured out all these ways to make food addictive without making it nutritious. So we're we're addicted to the the taste, and they have synthesized the taste. And but there's no nutrients in the food. So we're just getting bad food that's loaded with chemicals. A lot of them created in the laboratory that our bodies were not designed to metabolize.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

For environmental toxins, Robert Kennedy Jr is launching a comprehensive scientific inquiry: • MAHA Commission investigating chronic disease causes • Examining pesticides, food additives, EMFs • Reassessing fluoride after IQ impact studies • First-ever biomonitoring program https://t.co/BxiJ5oBjs5

Video Transcript AI Summary

Liz Eldon and the speaker are reassessing fluoride rules following the National Toxicity Program's August release. The new science shows a direct inverse correlation between fluoride exposure and IQ loss in children. Utah has become the first state in the country to ban supplemental fluoride. The speaker and Liz Eldon were in Utah this week to announce the ban.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm working with Liz Eldon to reassess the fluoride rules based upon the the August release by the National Toxicity Program of new science that shows a direct inverse correlation between exposure to fluoride and IQ loss, in children. Lee and I were in Utah this week Utah to announce that Utah became the first state in the country to ban supplemental fluoride.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

By September 2025, RFK Jr. pledged to identify causes of the autism epidemic. He's assembling hundreds of scientists to examine all environmental triggers. This commitment to transparency is unprecedented. https://t.co/8nPy8yv1Eh

Video Transcript AI Summary

Autism rates are rising, currently estimated at one in thirty-one and one in twelve, a significant increase from one in ten thousand in the speaker's childhood. A large-scale testing and research initiative involving hundreds of scientists worldwide has been launched. By September, the speaker claims they will know the cause of the autism epidemic and be able to eliminate the exposures responsible.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We have now the autism rates have gone from now most recent numbers, we think, are gonna be about one in thirty one and one in twelve. So they're going up again from one in ten thousand when I was a kid. And we are going at your direction. We are gonna know by September. We've launched a massive testing and research effort that's gonna involve hundreds of scientists from around the world. By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic, and we'll be we'll be able to eliminate those exposures. So big.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

What drove RFK Jr. to focus on health? "In 2003, my son developed severe food allergies overnight. After doctors had no answers, I began investigating environmental triggers myself." The medical establishment wasn't interested in his findings. https://t.co/9boRY2AYmD

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

On healthcare transparency, RFK Jr. has a clear vision: "We need incentives that are outcome-oriented. Doctors should get compensated for making people healthy, not ordering tests." When patients compare costs, hospitals can't hide markups. But transparency alone isn't enough. https://t.co/TWLL4qCnX9

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that individuals must take responsibility for their health, but the current healthcare system incentivizes expenditures rather than outcomes. Doctors are compensated for ordering more tests, creating a misalignment. The speaker advocates realigning incentives to compensate physicians for making patients healthy instead of ordering numerous tests. Some changes require statutory action, but others can be implemented within HHS and CMS. The speaker believes these changes will reduce costs and improve health outcomes.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We all have to start taking responsibility for our own health, and we need incentives. Right now, we have incentives in our health system that incentivize expenditures. So they compensate people doctors for ordering more and more tests. And and and it's a misalignment. We need to realign the set the incentives so that it's outcome oriented so that you get compensated if you're a physician for actually making somebody healthy rather than ordering a battery of tests. That Oh, is yeah. Some of that is a statutory changes, but some of it we can do in HHS and in CMS. We're looking for every opportunity to do that, and I think that's what's gonna reduce cause and make people healthier.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

What makes RFK Jr.'s approach different is his legal background: He doesn't just create regulations—he empowers enforcement. His team is hiring prosecutors instead of industry insiders to lead HHS divisions. For the first time, health violations will have consequences.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

"I'm going to fight for every American to have informed choice and access to all health options," says RFK Jr. "Hyperbaric chambers, stem cells, chelation therapies – it should all be available for people who want them."

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Why did Trump pick Kennedy? Not his famous name or environmental work. But his courage to challenge the pharma complex controlling our health agencies. https://t.co/BBDoPACv6A

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

"We cannot have a strong country if we have sick citizens," "President Trump wants to restore the American dream, but a healthy person has a thousand dreams. A person who is sick has only one."

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @Nas_tech_AI for more content on AI and politics. Appreciate the support.

@Nas_tech_AI — Nas

Posted - August 6, 2025 at 8:12 AM

Saved - August 6, 2025 at 11:41 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a recent interview, RFK Jr. claimed that CDC data indicated vaccines increased autism risk by 1,135% and alleged a 25-year cover-up. He highlighted a 1999 study manipulated to downplay risks, revealing that 97% of vaccine advisory committee members had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. He criticized the vaccine injury reporting system for underreporting and pointed out that doctors face financial incentives to ensure high vaccination rates. RFK Jr. advocates for transparency in CDC data to enable independent research on vaccine safety.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

RFK Jr. interview went viral In an interview with Tucker Carlson, he revealed the CDC’s own data showed vaccines increased autism by 1,135% and the 25-year cover-up that followed. 99% of Americans have never heard this. Here are the shocking revelations you need to know…(🧵) https://t.co/dnqTDrqYAU

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

1/ The 1999 CDC Study They Buried The CDC commissioned researcher Thomas Verstraeten to study hepatitis B vaccines given in the first 30 days of life. Result: 1,135% higher autism risk in vaccinated children. CDC's response? Bury it and manipulate the data through 5 revisions. https://t.co/aLh1v9TC9i

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They use fraudulent techniques. You know, they say statistics don't lie, but statisticians do. And epidemiological studies are very easy to manipulate. None of those studies did what you would want what you would do if you wanted to find the answer, which is compare outcomes in a fully vaccinated group to health outcomes in an unvaccinated group. And CDC did that study in 1999. They brought in a team of scientists under a Belgian researcher named Thomas Verstraten, and they looked at the data. They looked at children who had received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life, and compare those children to children who had received the vaccine later or not at all. And they found an eleven, one hundred and thirty five percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. And it shocked them. They kept the study secret, and and they manipulated it through five different iterations to try to bury the link.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

2/ How They Manipulated the Data "They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed with autism." Classic move: Change the study population until you get the result you want. https://t.co/NcQvZbdWD1

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims previous studies indicating no link between certain factors and specific outcomes were flawed. They allege researchers eliminated older children from the data, stratified the data improperly, and used other "tricks." The speaker states that external literature shows over 100 studies indicating a link. They announce plans to conduct new observational, retrospective, and epidemiological studies, as originally recommended by the Institute of Medicine, using publicly available databases. They characterize this new approach as "real science."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And, you know, we know how they did it. They got rid of all the older children essentially, and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. And they stratified stratified the data, and they did a lot of other tricks. And all of those studies were the subject of those kind of that kind of trickery. And so what we're gonna do now and meanwhile, the external literature is showing, you know, over a 100 studies that show that there indicate that there is a link. But what we're going to do now is we're going to do all the kind of studies that the Institute of Medicine originally recommended. And we're going to do observational studies, retrospective studies, and epidemiological studies. We're going to do real science. And the way that we're going to do that is we're going to make the databases public for the first time.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

But the corruption goes much deeper than just one study. The entire system that decides what vaccines your kids get has been captured...

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

3/ The Vaccine Committee Scandal 97% of vaccine advisory committee members had financial conflicts with pharma companies. Dr. Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccine while developing his own competing version. He sold it to Merck for $186 million. https://t.co/8Cu0EUBwrL

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker says a board was fired for being a "sock puppet" for the industry it regulated. In 2002, a government oversight committee held hearings about the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), stating that 97% of its members had undisclosed conflicts of interest. The rotavirus vaccine's approval was cited as an example, with four out of five board members having direct financial interests in it. Paul Offit, who frequently speaks about vaccines, voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule while developing his own. After the rotavirus vaccine was mandated, Offit's vaccine was guaranteed to be on the schedule. The approved vaccine was withdrawn due to causing intussusception in children. Offit and his business partners then sold their rotavirus vaccine to Merck for $186 million.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, we fired that board because they were it was an utterly it was just an instrument. It was a sock puppet for the industry that it was supposed to regulate. So, you know, they in fact, you know and this was a long time coming, Tucker. In 02/2002, the government oversight committee and the United States Congress held hearings about that board, which is called ASIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And they said that 97% of the people on that board had undisclosed conflicts, Many of them had disclosed conflicts as well. But they said that congress said that it gave an example. It said the rotavirus vaccine was approved by that board, and there were five members of that board at that time, and four of them had direct financial interests in the rotavirus vaccine. They were working for the companies that made the vaccine or they were receiving grants to do clinical trials on that vaccine. They all had overwhelming financial interests. One of the people on that board was a guy called Paul Offit, and who is one of the big voices for vaccines that they CNN goes to him all the time when it wants to have vaccines. He voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule when he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. Because it's now on the schedule, he is developing vaccine. It's virtually guaranteed to get on the schedule. It's a competitive product. But once you say rotavirus vaccine has to be vaccinated for, its vaccine is now guaranteed to get on the schedule. The one they voted on that he voted on, within a year, it had to be withdrawn because it was causing this really disastrous disease in kids that is often lethal called the intussusception, agonizingly painful when your intestines kind of tie up against each other. It kills children, you know, on on occasion. That vaccine was pulled the following year, and his vaccine then replaced him. He was still on the committee. He didn't vote on that, but he was still on the committee. But he voted to make rotavirus vaccine mandatory for the schedule. And he he he then he and his business partners, Stanley Plotkin and, you know, a couple of other people sold that vaccine and to Merck for a $186,000,000.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

4/ They Never Said No to Anything RFK Jr. fired all 17 committee members because they "never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons." They became a rubber stamp for the industry they were supposed to regulate. https://t.co/YpXAfSRpO3

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So that and that kind of conflict was typical on that committee, but that was the most Did did people know this was going on? That that's such an obvious conflict. The office of inspector general in this department investigated, and they said this is a disaster. You gotta change it. Congress investigated and said you gotta change it, and they did nothing. That's the most most sort of a glaring example of medical malpractice by this by this group is that they approved all these vaccines. We went from 11, remember, to 69 to 92. 11 vaccines in '86, and not one of them had except for COVID. COVID is the only one that had a pre licensing safety trial that involved a placebo, a true placebo. And so all of those other vaccines were ushered in without safety studies, and that means nobody understands the risk profile of those products. How how can you do that? That's they did it. It's corruption, and it's, you know, it's because of agency capture.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

5/ The Broken Injury Reporting System Harvard built an automated system to track vaccine injuries. They found that the current VAERS system captures less than 1% of injuries. Their system found 1 injury per 37 vaccines given. CDC's response? Shelved it. https://t.co/OZPMTCjqZo

Video Transcript AI Summary

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to analyze vaccine injuries through cluster analysis. Led by Lazarus, the team tested the system at Harvard Pilgrim HMO, comparing its findings to VAERS data. The study revealed that VAERS captured less than 1% of vaccine injuries, while their system captured over 95%. The data indicated injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, roughly one out of every 37. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC allegedly shelved it in 2010. The speaker claims that for 22 years the CDC has continued to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that accurately tracks vaccine injuries.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: CDC designed a machine counting system that would do essentially a cluster analysis. They would look at the vaccine, and then they would look at clusters of injuries that were unique or anomalous to that vaccine. And it was a very accurate system according to the, you know, the group that designed it. It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus. And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study. And they looked at one HMO, which was Harvard Pilgrim up in Massachusetts, and they did they did this this machine counting system for Harvard Pilgrim. And then they compared what the machine counting system had gotten, you know, had yielded and collected in terms of vaccine entries, and they compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. And they said that VAERS was capturing fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. And they had a system now that would capture over ninety five percent, and they were very proud, and they brought it to CDC and said, our system works. Here's the data. The data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of of vaccines. Of all vaccines? Yeah. All vaccines. About two point seven percent. Wow. Which I think is something like one out of every thirty seven vaccines you get, there's an injury. And CDC saw that and said, we're not going to use the system. And they shelved it in 2010, and they've continued to use now for, you know, twenty two years when they know that it doesn't work, it was to fail. We're going to absolutely change VAERS, and we're gonna make it we're we're going to create either in within VAERS or supplementary VAERS a system that actually works.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

6/ Media Capture Through Advertising Roger Ailes told RFK Jr. he couldn't discuss vaccines on Fox News. Why? "75% of evening news advertising revenues are coming from pharma." Pharma spent $4.58 billion on TV ads in 2020 alone. https://t.co/CDp0BUBfJZ

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker had a long-standing, if politically opposed, friendship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from time spent together in Africa. Despite their disagreements, the founder was loyal and ensured the speaker, an environmentalist, appeared on Fox News programs with hosts like Sean Hannity. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which resonated with him due to a personal connection. However, the founder said he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because doing so would lead to repercussions from Rupert Murdoch and potential firings, as pharmaceutical companies accounted for 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, a primary revenue source vital for the financially struggling networks.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Was the founder of Fox News. And I had this odd relationship with him because politically, we were at loggerheads. But I had spent when I was 19 years old, I spent three months with him in a tent in Africa. And I and we developed a friendship then. And as you know, he was very, you know, he was a very engaging guy. He was very witty, really fun to be with, very paranoid, but at the same time brilliant. Yes. And he and so he was very kind to me. He was a very loyal friend to me, and he would make Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and Neil Cavuto and all the other hosts, your former colleagues, wouldn't be on TV to talk about the environment. Even though he didn't agree with me on it, he made them put me on. So during the eighties and nineties, I I was the only environmentalist who was going on Fox News. But I brought him one time this around I think it was, like, 2014. I brought him a a documentary that we had done about mercury and vaccines, and he had he watched it. He was completely sold on it. He had a family member who had been affected, he felt. And he said, but I can't put you on because if I did, I if any of my hosts allowed you on to talk about this issue, I would have to fire them. And if I didn't, I would get a call from Ruper within ten minutes. And he said, for the evening news division, about 75% of the advertising revenues are coming from pharma. And then he told me something that, if I remember it correctly, he said that on a typical evening news show, there are 22 ads, and 17 of those are pharmaceutical ads. And so this was the principal source of revenue. And for a lot of these television networks, it's keeping them alive. As you know, they're all kind of collapsing financially.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

7/ Your Doctor's Financial Incentives Insurance companies pay doctors bonuses when 95% of their patients are "fully vaccinated." Want to space out vaccines? Many pediatricians will drop you. Your medical choice threatens their bonus check. https://t.co/C1zCGdToUj

Video Transcript AI Summary

Doctors have incentives related to vaccines, with one article claiming that 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from them. Insurance companies like Blue Cross allegedly pay bonuses to pediatricians who maintain high vaccination rates among their clients, potentially tens of thousands of dollars. This bonus structure is claimed to be the reason pediatricians might dismiss patients who want alternative vaccine schedules. These incentives are characterized as perverse, hindering doctors from prioritizing patient care over financial gain. It is claimed that twenty years ago, 20% of doctors worked for corporations, but now 80% do, with corporations prioritizing revenue over patient well-being.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So the doctors also have their own incentives, you know, prefers incentives. There's a published article out there now that says that 50% of revenues to most pediatricians come from vaccines. And then there's a whole structure where Blue Cross and the other insurance companies pay bonuses to the pediatrician to make sure if, for example, ninety five percent of their their clients are fully vaccinated, they get a huge bonus. It could be tens of thousands of dollars. And that's why your pediatrician, if you say, I want to go slow on the vaccines, or I want to have a little different schedule, your pediatrician will throw you out of his practice, because you're now jeopardizing that bonus structure. And these are all perverse incentives that stop doctors from actually practicing medicine and caring for the client because they're looking at the bottom line. Twenty years ago, twenty percent of the doctors in this country worked for corporations. Today, 80% do. And that corporation is telling you, you know, we don't care what happens to your patient. We care about how much revenue you're generating.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

8/ Complete Legal Immunity The 1986 Vaccine Act gave manufacturers total immunity from lawsuits. No matter how reckless, how toxic, how damaging—you can't sue them. Since then: vaccine schedule went from 11 to 92 doses by age 18. https://t.co/QeffO3lHzC

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims there is a connection between autism and government-promoted vaccines, which constitutes a tort, implying many people were injured. They ask how these injured parties can be made whole. Another speaker explains that the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Vaccine Act gave vaccine companies immunity from liability, regardless of recklessness, toxicity, or injury severity. This immunity prevents lawsuits against vaccine companies and is presented as a reason for the increase in vaccinations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There is a connection between autism and vaccines, vaccines the government promoted, in some cases, effectively required. That's a tort. I mean, that means there are a lot of injured people who can now show they were injured by this product. How were they made whole? What happens to them? Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be complicated because in 1986, Congress passed an act, the Vaccine Act, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability. So no matter how reckless the company is, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how egregious your injury, you cannot sue them. And that's one of the problems is and that actually is why we one of the reasons we had this explosion of the vaccination

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The result? Epidemics of autoimmune diseases, autism, ADHD, and allergies that were virtually unknown when we were kids. Each vaccine is "designed to permanently alter your immune system." https://t.co/CBcFO7aaSa

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You know, when I was a kid, we only had three vaccines. And, by 1986, the year the act was passed, there were 11 doses of, I think, five vaccines. And today, there are a child to to to go to school in states like California and New York and many other states where you have mandates. The an American child now has to receive between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines between conception. So some of those are given to the mom during pregnancy and age 18. And the reason it's 69 to 82 is some of the vaccines have or or the different brands have different dose requirements. So some will require three doses. Some will require one dose, some will require four doses. But that's a lot of vaccines for a kid, and each one of those is calculate is is designed to permanently alter your immune system. And so we have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, you know, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits. And if you look at all of these diseases that have become epidemic, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, all of these seizure neurological disorders like ADD, ADHD, speech delayed, language delayed, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism, all the diseases. UNN, I never saw when we were kids. And suddenly, they're this generation is damaged, and it's incredibly damaged by all these disease.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

RFK Jr.'s solution is revolutionary transparency. He's making CDC databases public for the first time. Using AI to detect real injury patterns. Independent scientists worldwide will finally study the data.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

This isn't anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. It's about having honest science instead of industry propaganda. For 25 years, they've hidden the data. Now we'll finally see what they don't want us to know. A major breakthrough in our healthcare system.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @Nas_tech_AI for more content on AI and politics. Appreciate the support.

@Nas_tech_AI — Nas

Posted - July 28, 2025 at 8:26 AM

Saved - July 29, 2025 at 1:58 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Big Pharma faces scrutiny as Trump and RFK Jr. unveil a pricing disparity that costs Americans significantly more for medications than in Europe. For instance, a breast cancer drug priced at $16,000 in the U.S. is only $1,600 in Sweden. Americans, making up just 4% of the global population, contribute two-thirds of pharmaceutical profits, a situation maintained by strong lobbying. Trump's new executive order aims to align U.S. drug prices with the lowest prices in developed countries, potentially reducing costs by up to 90%. The administration is pushing for compliance within 30 days.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Big Pharma is in trouble. Trump and RFK Jr. exposed a scam that’s been costing Americans billions for years. The room fell silent when Trump revealed why Americans pay 10X more than Europe for identical drugs. You won’t believe what you’re about to hear. A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/G5jyuUCN5X

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

For decades, Americans have paid the highest prescription drug prices in the world. How much higher? A breast cancer drug that costs Americans $16,000 per bottle costs just ONE-TENTH that price in Sweden. The same drug. Same factory. Same company. https://t.co/hk0jBOsqWT

Video Transcript AI Summary

One breast cancer drug costs over $16,000 per bottle in America. The same drug, from the same factory and company, costs one sixth the price in Australia. In Sweden, the identical product costs one tenth the American price.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One breast cancer drug costs Americans over $16,000 per bottle, but the same drug from the same factory manufactured by the same company is one sixth that price in Australia and one tenth that price in Sweden. One tenth for the identical product.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

A common asthma drug costs nearly $500 in America but less than $40 in the United Kingdom. And that weight loss "fat shot" all the celebrities use? Americans pay 10X more than people in other developed countries. But why? https://t.co/CgoEF9M29n

Video Transcript AI Summary

A common asthma drug costs almost $500 in America, but less than $40 in The United Kingdom. The speaker highlights the significant price difference, noting one person paid a small amount for the same shot in the UK. The weight loss drug Ozempic costs 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world, according to the speaker, who questions the reason for this disparity.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: A common asthma drug costs almost $500 here in America, but costs less than $40 in The United Kingdom. So $40 in The United Kingdom, which is where this gentleman told me he paid a small amount for his his shot. But think of that. So $40 versus $500 here. That's not even better. Much worse examples. And the weight loss drug Ozempic cost 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world. 10 times more. Why? Why? What what did we do?

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Trump told a shocking story about a businessman friend who called him from London: "President, I just paid $88 for this fat drug I take. In New York, I paid $1,300. What the hell is going on?" Same box. Same plant. Same company. Identical pill. https://t.co/OWQzO6fzGA

Video Transcript AI Summary

A businessman told the speaker that the same fat shot drug cost him $88 in London but $1,300 in New York. The drugs were identical, made in the same plant by the same company. The speaker discussed this with a representative from the drug companies, who admitted there was no justification for the price difference.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I mean, I'll tell you a story. A friend of mine who's a a businessman, very, very, very top guy. Most of you would have heard of him. Highly neurotic, brilliant businessman, seriously overweight, and he takes the fat the fat shot drug. And he called me up and he said, president. He calls me he used to call me Donald, now he calls me president. So that's nice respect. But he's a rough guy, smart guy, very successful, very rich. I wouldn't even know how we would know this, but because he's got comments. President, could I ask you a question? What? I'm in London, and I just paid for this damn fat drug I take. I said, it's not working. They said he said, I just paid $88, and in New York, I paid $1,300. What the hell is going on? He said, so I checked, and it's the same box made in the same plant by the same company. It's the identical pill that I buy in New York, and here I'm paying $88 in London. In New York, I'm paying $1,300. Now, this is a great businessman, so but he's not familiar with this crazy situation that we have. But he was stunned. But it was just one of those stories. And I brought it up with the drug companies, represented by somebody who's very, very smart. Good person too. And we argued about it for about half hour. And then finally, he just said, because they can't justify it. He just said, look, you got me. You got me.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Here's where it gets interesting... Americans represent just 4% of the world's population but generate TWO-THIRDS of pharmaceutical companies' global profits. This isn't an accident. It's by design. https://t.co/91RtlFLeWA

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical companies generate over two-thirds of their profits in the United States, despite the U.S. accounting for only 4% of the world's population. The speaker expresses respect for pharmaceutical companies and their leadership. They believe these companies successfully convinced people for many years that the current system was fair, even though the reasons why were not widely understood.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Even though The United States is home to only 4% of the world's population, pharmaceutical companies make more than two thirds of their profits in America. So think of that. With 4% of the population, the pharmaceutical companies make most of their money, most of their profits from America. That's not a good thing. Now, I think by the way, pharmaceutical I have great respect for these companies and for the people that run them. Really do. And I think they did one of the greatest jobs in history for their company, convincing people for many years that this was a fair system. Never nobody really understood why, but I figured it out.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

For years, Big Pharma claimed these outrageous price differences were necessary to fund "research and development." The truth? Foreign countries strong-armed these companies into giving them rock-bottom prices. So who made up the difference? You guessed it. Americans https://t.co/lXuruaePXd

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical companies claimed high R&D costs had to be borne solely by America, effectively subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in countries like Germany and the European Union. The speaker believes the European Union is "nastier than China" and has treated the U.S. unfairly, but predicts they will concede because the U.S. "has all the cards."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: For years, pharmaceutical and drug companies have said that research and development costs were what they are. And for no reason whatsoever, they had to be borne by America alone. Not anymore, they don't. This means American patients were effectively subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in Germany, in all parts of the European Union. They they were the toughest of all. They were nasty. And I see that. I see that with trade too. European Union is, in many ways, nastier than China. Okay? And we've just started with them. Oh, they'll come down a lot. You watch. We have all the cards. They treated us very unfairly.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The European Union and other nations told drug companies: "This is what we're going to pay. If you don't like it, you can't sell in our country." With no government fighting for Americans, pharmaceutical companies simply shifted the cost burden onto US patients. https://t.co/dse95xxsIq

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states that countries represented by the European Union will be told "that game is up." If they "get cute," they won't be able to sell cars into the United States anymore. The speaker claims that European unions and other countries gave drug companies a price, expecting America to pay the difference to cover a shortfall. The speaker says "that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Biggest thing we're gonna do is we're gonna tell those countries, like those represented by the European Union, that, you know, that game is up. Sorry. And if they wanna get cute, then they don't have to sell cars into The United States anymore. It's a very big subject. And, they won't get cute because I'll defend the drug companies from that standpoint. They were given a price by the European unions and other countries. This is what you do. This is what we're gonna pay. We're not gonna pay anymore. Let America pay the difference because it was a big shortfall. Let America pay it. And that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

It was a brilliant scam that went unchallenged for decades. Why? Trump revealed the uncomfortable truth: "The drug lobby is the strongest lobby in this country." Both parties talked about lowering drug prices. Neither delivered. Until now.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Trump's new executive order implements what he calls "most favored nations drug pricing." The principle is simple but revolutionary: Whatever the lowest price paid for a drug in other developed countries, that's what Americans will pay. https://t.co/vsuwqgxGmY

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker's administration will implement "most favored nations" drug pricing, ensuring Americans pay the lowest price for drugs compared to other developed countries. Some prescription drug prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50% to 90%. Big Pharma must voluntarily comply or the federal government will ensure equal pricing. To accelerate price reductions, the administration will cut out the middlemen to facilitate direct drug sales to American citizens at the most favored nation price. The speaker believes the middlemen are worse than drug companies because they don't make a product but make a fortune.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: My administration will secure what we're calling most favored nations drug pricing. The principle is simple. Whatever the lowest price paid for a drug in other developed countries, that is the price that Americans will pay. And we're using the term other developed countries because there are some countries that need some additional help, that's fine. I think that's very good. Some prescription drug and pharmaceutical prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50 to 80 to 90%. Big Pharma will either abide by this principle voluntarily or will use the power of the federal government to ensure that we are paying the same price as other countries. To accelerate these price restrictions and reductions, my administration will also cut out the middlemen. We're gonna totally cut out the famous middlemen. Nobody knows who they are. Middlemen. They've I've been hearing the term for twenty five years. Middlemen, I don't know who they are, but they're rich. That I can tell you. We're gonna cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favored nation price directly to the American citizen. So we're cutting out, Bobby, the middlemen. It's so important. Right? I gotta do that. They get they get they're worse than the drug companies. They don't even make a product, and they make a fortune.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Here's how it works: If a cancer drug sells for $100 in Australia but $1,000 in America, the US price drops to match the Australian price. Trump's estimate? Drug prices will fall by 59-90% almost immediately.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

But what about those "research and development" costs? Trump's solution is elegant: Other countries must pay more. No longer will Americans subsidize the world's healthcare while Europeans pay pennies on the dollar for the same medications. https://t.co/ZnERHMQDo1

Video Transcript AI Summary

Healthcare companies will likely maintain similar profits despite global changes because it's a redistribution of wealth, not a reduction. Europe and the rest of the world will pay slightly more, while America will pay significantly less. This is due to America's smaller population relative to the global population. The top line revenue for healthcare companies will remain consistent, but the distribution of payments will shift globally.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Believe it or not, you know, because it's really the world we're talking about, not just the European Union. But because it's the world, the numbers are the numbers are, for the health care company, not as bad as you would think. They'll make the same. I think the health care companies should make pretty much the same money. I really don't believe they're gonna they should be affected very much because it's just a redistribution of wealth. It's a redistribution where it could be the same top line, but it's gonna be distributed differently. Europe's gonna have to pay a little bit more. The rest of the world's gonna have to pay a little bit more, and America's gonna pay a lot less. Again, because we it's a much smaller population than when you think of the whole world.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

During the announcement, RFK Jr. revealed something stunning: "Every major Democratic leader for 20 years made this promise to the American people." Yet none delivered. Why? "Congress is controlled in so many ways by the pharmaceutical industry." https://t.co/CUVA1n9RRD

Video Transcript AI Summary

Politicians have long promised to eliminate the discrepancy between drug prices in the U.S. and Europe. This was a key issue for Bernie Sanders, but previous leaders haven't acted on it. Politicians make these promises knowing they likely won't have to fulfill them. The reason is that Congress is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. There is at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, senator, and Supreme Court member.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is an extraordinary day. This is an issue that you know, I grew up in the Democratic party, and every major Democratic leader for twenty years has been making this promise to the American people. This was the fulcrum of Bernie Sanders runs for presidency that he was gonna eliminate this discrepancy between Europe and The United States. But as it turns out, none of them were doing it. It's one of these promises that politicians make to their constituents knowing that they'll never have to do it. And the reason they'll never have to do it is because they know that Congress is controlled in so many ways by the pharmaceutical industry. There's at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, every senator in Capitol Hill, and every member of the Supreme Court.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

RFK Jr. continued: "There's at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, every senator on Capitol Hill, and every member of the Supreme Court." The industry spends 3X what the next largest lobbying group spends. https://t.co/sfxD3gT3Tg

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims the United States spends $1,126 per capita on drugs, while Britain spends about $240, approximately one-fifth of the U.S. figure, a trend seen across Europe. The speaker says drug companies claim America must pay for pharmaceutical innovation. President Trump is quoted as saying European partners need to increase their drug payments to cover their share of innovation, asserting the U.S. should no longer subsidize it. The speaker concludes that if Europeans raised drug prices by 20%, the resulting $10 trillion could be spent on innovation, improving global health.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We spend in our country $1,126 per capita on drugs. In Britain, they spend about 240. They spend one fifth of what we do. And this is true across Europe. And this and the drug companies, Europeans, if you ask them, it made no sense what they were saying. America has to pay for this innovation or it's not gonna happen. President Trump is saying to our European partners is you've got to raise the amount that you're paying for those drugs and pay for your share of the innovation. That The United States is no longer subsidizing that. If the Europeans raise the price of their drugs by just 20%, That is $10,000,000,000,000 that can be spent on innovation and the health of all people all across the globe is going to increase because we're going to have better products.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

By comparison with other countries, the numbers are staggering: Americans spend $1,126 per capita on drugs. The British? About $240. Europeans pay less than ONE-FIFTH what Americans pay for identical medications. https://t.co/erlsQOIOGv

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical companies spend three times more on lobbying than the next largest lobbyist. While many discussed the issue, nobody acted due to its controversial nature. President Trump, described as a man of his word, is willing to stand up to the oligarchs, unlike most politicians who can be bought. Despite allegedly receiving $100,000,000 from the pharmaceutical industry, Trump cannot be bought. The speaker praises President Trump for his courage and willingness to stand up for the American people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Pharmaceutical companies, the industry itself spends three times what's what the next largest lobbyist spends on lobbying. So this was a this this was an issue that people talked about, but nobody wanted to do anything anything because it was radioactive. They knew you couldn't get it by Congress. We now have a president who is a man of his word, who has the courage. President Trump was taking money from the pharmaceutical industry too. Think they gave you $100,000,000 But he can't be bought unlike most of the politicians in this country. And he is standing here for the American people. I don't know what you know, there's there's writers like Lord Elizabeth Warren or Robert Reich who are saying that President Trump is on this side of the oligarchs. There has never been a president more willing to stand up to the oligarchs than President Donald Trump. And I'm very, very proud of you, Mr. President, for your courage, for your, I'll say, because I don't want to be crude, your intestinal fortitude, your stiff spine, and your willingness to stand up for the American people.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Trump isn't asking pharmaceutical companies to lose money. The solution is equalization: Europeans will pay more, Americans will pay less, and drug companies maintain their overall revenue. It's a redistribution of who carries the financial burden.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

FDA Commissioner Makary put it in perspective during the announcement: "A drug that costs $175,000 in America might cost just $10,000 in London." He called it "the most powerful executive order on pharmacy pricing and healthcare ever in the history of our nation." https://t.co/f3qcZwFRKn

Video Transcript AI Summary

A regular Ford car costing $175,000 is being purchased in London for $10,000 daily, highlighting a "crazy" system. The FDA will fully support the executive order, which is considered transformative.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Imagine buying a Ford for a $175,000, a regular car, and then hearing that people in London are buying it for $10,000 every day, all day long. That is the craziness of this system. We're going to do everything we can at the FDA to support this executive order. It's transformative. Thank you, Mr. President.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The administration has given pharmaceutical companies 30 days to begin implementation. If they don't comply voluntarily, Trump will use America's massive trade leverage to ensure compliance. And he'll add tariffs to countries that don't pay their fair share.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @Nas_tech_AI for more content on AI and politics. Appreciate the support.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

@fxitozero Yeah, surely it is

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

@garnettime6 Thank you for appreciating my work.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

@JazeScott You're not wrong, corporate money and political kickbacks have a massive influence.

@Nas_tech_AI — Nas

Posted - June 21, 2025 at 8:45 AM

Saved - June 21, 2025 at 12:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The United States continues to support Israel amid the Iran and Palestine conflict, having invested $728 billion in military technology research last year. I shared 11 secret military technologies that are both advanced and alarming. These include the PHASR laser, the AI-powered Pulsar system, Iron Vision for tank operators, the SCORPION mobile mortar, and several others like the Yak Robot and Black Hornet nano-drone. Each technology showcases the cutting-edge capabilities being developed for modern warfare. I hope you find this information insightful.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The US supports Israel in the Iran and Palestine war. Last year, the United States invested $728 billion in military technology research. These weapons are terrifying and beyond comprehension. Here are 11 SECRET US military technologies you should know about: 1. The PHASR laser

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

2. Pulsar An advanced AI-powered electromagnetic warfare system, designed to detect and neutralize threats within hours or even minutes.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Before continuing let's introduce you to Vidnoz AI - FREE AI VIDEO GENERATOR @vidnoz_official ➽ Create Engaging AI Videos, 10x Faster & Free ➽Tackle Different Video Challenges with You ➽ Realistic AI Spokespersons of Any Style 🔗https://bit.ly/463b5J8

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

3. Iron Vision A system that lets tank operators see the outside world without leaving the vehicle. Using a smart helmet, it projects the battlefield environment, similar to what F-35 pilots use.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

4. SCORPION This is the Fastest Mobile Mortar System in the World. Check out this live-fire demonstration of our SCORPION Mobile Mortar System. It is a fully digital, automated mortar system that features a Shoot & Scoot capability able to fire 8 rounds in 2 minutes

Video Transcript AI Summary

The vehicle's frame protects passengers and the ground. Its quick change barrel system allows switching between 81 or 120-millimeter motors in just three minutes. This flexibility leads to game-changing automation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In the frame of the vehicle or any passengers on board and into the ground. Its quick change barrel system enables flexibility between 81 or one twenty millimeter motors needing only three minutes to swap. The results are game changing. Automation

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Attention 🧵 Tired of your inbox overflowing with newsletters? Now you can read the best in news, business, tech, and more all in one clean app. Free Sign-up. No clutter. Check it out here: https://www.meco.app/get/6x7r

Meco An app built for mindful newsletter & Substack reading. Meco is a newsletter reader for distraction-free reading, giving your email inbox space to breathe web.meco.app

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

5. RAILINK Introducing RAILINK, the first-of-its-kind, integrated, in-rail solution that simplifies the life of the user by running multiple head-mounted accessories from a single, centralized power source. https://t.co/lhY39P1irT

Video Transcript AI Summary

A rail system adds power and data connectivity, as well as a centralized battery pack, to the next generation. Before this rail system, additional holes were drilled because there was no connectivity. Adding more to the helmet increases weight.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Takes that to the next generation by adding power and data connectivity and a centralized battery pack. Speaker 1: Until this rail system came out, we were drilling additional holes into this because we didn't have that. Then we start adding more and more to our helmet. You know, overall adding more weight and everything had its

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

6. Yak Robot Developed in China, this four-legged robot is built to carry up to 160 kg of cargo across challenging terrains like deserts and mountains, moving at speeds of up to 10 km/h. https://t.co/53u6zegxs3

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

🚨 BREAKING: Good news for Americans. It's a pain relief solution. AI can now make real phone calls, argue with customer service, and get refunds for you. This isn’t ChatGPT. It’s Pine AI and its scary good. Here's how to use it for free: https://cutt.ly/urQ5AQ4y https://t.co/PBvW2jLYqv

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

7. Agilite BuddyStrap Human Backpack The Agilite BuddyStrap is a revolutionary emergency device that allows you to carry an injured person on your own, easily and hands free. https://t.co/a9PIyYvwJc

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

8. Legion The Legion platform, mounted on shields, fires 18.5x45 non-lethal knock-down, flashbang, and irritant rounds. Its 12-shot cluster launcher supports all three types. https://t.co/IgajAUX1wo

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

9. Black Hornet Meet the Black Hornet 3 nano-drone: weighs under 33 grams, flies silently, and provides soldiers with real-time battlefield insights. Straight from Teledyne FLIR. https://t.co/z9jiLfspZv

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

10. BANS BANS is a brand-new patented understanding and logic of air defense support weapon capabilities. BANS stimulates a countermeasure of the aircraft missile launch warning and detection system. https://t.co/tT6JseI1W6

Video Transcript AI Summary

BANS is described as a "war changer" providing effective anti-aircraft defense without firing. It's based on the Vicheron approach, a very short air defense tactic. BANS electronically stimulates an aircraft's missile launch warning system, causing it to dispense countermeasures like flares due to uncertainty about the threat. This renders the aircraft vulnerable, forcing the pilot to either abort the mission or proceed into potential fire. This changes air defense philosophy. BANS is presented as a cost-effective, easy-to-use secondary weapon for battlefield distribution. It is claimed it will change the course of future air strike missions as a non-lethal battlefield air defense system.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: BANS, a real war changer. Effective anti aircraft defense without a single shot fired. BANS is based on the revolutionary Vicheron, very short air defense tactical approach. BANS electronically stimulates the aircraft's missile launch warning and detection system. Unsure if it is a lethal or non lethal threat, the aircraft will dispense countermeasures with a decoy of flares. The aircraft becomes fully vulnerable. The pilot can either abort the mission or fly through open fire. Air defense philosophy has changed. VANS is a cost effective, easy to use secondary weapon distributed throughout the battlefield. It will change the course of future air strike missions. Vans, non lethal battlefield, very short air defense system.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

11. Teledyne FLIR Rogue 1 Rogue 1 is a cutting-edge VTOL LUAS designed for modern warfare. Features include: - Rapid deployment - Minimal collateral damage - Speeds over 70 mph - 30-minute endurance - 10 km range https://t.co/h1w6iu4GgZ

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @Nas_tech_AI for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can. https://t.co/qbbxYmLAfp

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Nas_tech_AI