TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NathanielSami
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
Keep it up Senator Kennedy! You are fighting the good fight.!!! https://t.co/A0RBhAXaCP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly.
- On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context].
- On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time.
- On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds.
- On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.”
- Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't you think your hyperbolic statements undermine your credibility?
Speaker 1: What hyperbolic statement did I make?
Speaker 0: On 02/11/2026, you posted on Blueski, quote, my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law, end quote. Did I read that correctly?
Speaker 1: I believe you did. Do you disagree with it? You think people should do unethical things in their capacity of
Speaker 0: 12/31/2025. You posted to in front But wait. Wait. Do you disagree with what I finish my question. You answered, sir.
Sure. In front of god and country. You said, quote, they referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing, end quote. Your your words not mine. Did I read that correctly?
Speaker 1: That was in regard to a Did did I read that? Security post about advocating a 100,000,000 deportations. That is what DHS has tweeted from their own account. A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing. You would be True.
One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland homeland security.
Speaker 0: Don't think this is hyperbolic? Give me thirty more seconds.
Speaker 1: I think advocating a 100,000,000
Speaker 0: reputations is I'm having fun here, mister chairman. Cleansing. On February 5, you you you quoted the you said the following on Blueski. Your your time These is are all good, but there's no enforcement mechanism. I'm sorry.
Let me try a better one. On March 2, you said, quote, if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.
Speaker 1: They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my my account. I I appreciate Here's the good news.
Speaker 0: What planet Wait a minute. Minute, mister chairman. What planet did you just parachute him from?
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 0: Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,
Speaker 1: Mr. Bieber.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
Boom! Do you support this?.!!! https://t.co/XdK6h5nNyH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a scenario of a trendy illegal immigrant arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the 2023 crisis, aided by taxpayer-funded NGOs, and released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court. He asserts the person will file a bare-bones, frivolous asylum application, aided by another NGO, and that due to a nearly 4,000,000-case immigration court backlog, the case will take years to be heard. In the meantime, the individual is said to move to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, commit crimes, be supported by sanctuary-city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who oppose strict immigration laws. The process allegedly drags on with continuances and motions, and years later an immigration judge supposedly denies the asylum claim. The individual is said to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which allegedly takes months or years, followed by appellate denial in a federal court of appeals. The speaker charges that federal departments and courts expend many taxpayer dollars on such cases, all to deport an apparently frivolous claimant.
The focal policy proposal is the expedited removal of criminal aliens act, described as straightforward: criminal aliens cannot misuse the asylum system and must be detained and deported quickly if they are in the U.S. with certain criminal convictions. The speaker notes that current law already permits expedited removal for aggravated felon aliens, who are considered ineligible for asylum and relief and are presumed deportable; this is said to be constitutionally upheld by every federal court of appeals that has addressed it. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may face removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security to place additional criminals in expedited removal. It would allow fast-track deportation for non-lawful permanent residents who are in a gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes.
The bill’s specified conviction categories include: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; any assault on a law enforcement officer; any sexual offense; any crime of domestic violence; any stalking; any crime against children; sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors; sexual abuse of a minor; any activity involving child sexual exploitation; or any violation of a protective order. The term “vulnerable group” covers a child under 16, a pregnant woman, a person with severe disability, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites a poll claiming 78% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats, and asserts broad public support for tougher immigration action while criticizing Democrats’ handling of border policy. He accuses Democrats of previously expanding border openings, cites alleged prior high border encounters, millions of entrants, and 2,000,000 “gotaways,” along with terrorists allegedly released and a record immigration court backlog, blaming the Democrats for a perceived border crisis. He argues recent House actions and votes against border-security measures and declares the bill a step toward securing the border and reforming immigration policy, urging support. He concludes by urging colleagues to back the expedited removal of criminal aliens act.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine a a trendy Aragua gang member arrives at the Southwest Border illegally near the height of the Democrat Biden Harris border crisis in 2023. He's traveled a long way, but, of course, he's got taxpayer funded NGOs who've who have provided him assistance throughout his entire journey. He's one of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens encountered at The US Southwest Border that month and more than 2,000,000 that year alone. Because border patrol is overwhelmed, he's released into the interior of the country with a notice to appear in immigration court to remain in the country and get a work permit. He'll fire file a bare bones application for asylum that everybody knows is frivolous and stands no chance of success.
Another taxpayer funded NGO in The US told him to do that, and he files his his, asylum application anyways. Because the immigration court backlog is nearly 4,000,000 cases, it'll be years before his flimsy cases heard by an immigration judge. In the meantime, he'll move to New York or Chicago or San Francisco, be given taxpayer funded benefits, be arrested for one crime or another, be coddled by sanctuary city leaders, and defended by Democrats who say America's long standing immigration laws are simply too mean. Yet he'll remain in the immigration court back log for years filing continuance after continuance in motion after motion to delay his eventual removal from The United States. Years later, an immigration judge inevitably denies his frivolous asylum claim.
The illegal alien gang member will appeal appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which will then take months, if not years, to reach a decision on his case. Once the Board of Immigration Appeals affirms the immigration judge's obvious decision, the illegal alien gang member will again appeal, this time to a federal court of appeals, which will take even more months, if not years, to deny his appeal. That's the process for one hypothetical illegal alien gang member allowed into The United States, it's not, abnormal by any means, due to the open borders Democrat administration years ago. Thousands of federal man hours at the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and in the federal courts have been expended on this case alone, including countless taxpayer dollars. All of this to deny a frivolous claim by an illegal alien gang member to ensure he's deported from The United States.
Today, we'll consider a bill to help in this insane nonsense. The expedited removal of criminal aliens act is straightforward. It says if you're a criminal alien in The United States, you cannot game our asylum system, and you cannot take advantage of the American people's generosity and remain in the country for years waiting for an immigration court hearing. If you're a foreign national who is convicted of certain crimes, you're ineligible for immigration benefits and relief. You must be detained and you must be deported quickly.
For decades, current immigration laws authorized a more efficient process to quickly remove certain dangerous criminal aliens from the country. Under existing law, aggravated felon aliens can be removed from The United States without going through traditional immigration court removal proceedings. Current law also makes aliens convicted of aggravated felonies ineligible for immigration relief such as asylum and presumes they are deportable from The United States. This process is known as administrative removal or expedited removal. Every federal court of appeals to consider the constitutionality of these expedited procedures have held that the current statute comports with due process.
This bill expands the categories of criminal aliens that may be placed in removal proceedings when they are in criminal custody and authorizes DHS to place additional criminal aliens in expedited removal proceedings. The bill allows DHS to fast track the deportation of aliens who are not lawful permanent residents and one are members of a criminal gang transnational criminal organization or foreign terrorist organ organization or two have been convicted of dangerous crimes. Democrats, I'm sure, are going to hyperventilate about this bill, but before they do, let's listen to the categories of criminal convictions to which this bill applies. Any felony, any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group, any assault of a law enforcement officer, any sexual offense, any crime of domestic violence, any stalking offense, any crime against children, sex trafficking of a minor or sexual abuse of a minor, any activity relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, or any violation of a protective order. A vulnerable, excuse me, group in this context includes a younger, a child younger than 16, a pregnant woman, an individual with a severe physical or mental disability, and senior citizens over the age of 65.
I think mister chairman, this is a bill that the American people agree with. In fact, a poll from just a few weeks ago showed that 78% of Americans support deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes. That includes nearly 70% of Democrats. And those numbers are a breathless eleven or or after a breathless eleven month full court press by Democrats and their far left media allies to demonize the men and women carrying out federal immigration enforcement every single day. It isn't working.
In fact, a clear majority, 56% of Americans agree with deporting all immigrants who are in the country illegally. Even 36% of Democrats believe that all illegal aliens should be deported. It's no surprise. Let's consider what Democrats did to this country for four years. Historic highs of border encounters with border patrol overrun in the Southwest border completely abandoned.
At least 8,000,000 illegal aliens allowed to enter The United States, including 2,000,000 gotaways who evaded apprehension entirely. Hundreds of aliens on the terrorist watch list encountered at the Southwest border with at least 99 potential terrorists released into the country, and we believe that number is probably significantly higher. That also led to an immigration court backlog that exploded to its highest ever. And the Democrat party sat by and enabled the the border crisis every single step of the way doing nothing to stop it. In fact, doing everything they could to encourage it.
When Democrats controlled and enjoyed unified control of the government with the White House, the House of Representatives, and the Senate, they went out of their way to leave our border open. They did nothing to secure the border, nothing to keep Americans safer, and nothing to enact what they constantly drone about which is con comprehensive immigration reform. So what have they done? Last congress, the house passed a bill to secure the border and protect Americans. Every house democrat voted against it.
Last congress, the house passed a bill to kick out foreign nationals who steal Americans' identities and can and commit social security fraud. A 155 democrats voted against it. Just this congress, the house passed a bill to kick drunk driving illegal aliens out of the country. A 160 house Democrats voted against it. Just two months ago, we passed a bill to increase prison sentences for illegal aliens convicted of felonies.
A 197 house Democrats voted against it. In January, we passed the Lake and Riley Act named in honor of the Georgia nursing student brutally murdered by an illegal alien. A 156 house Democrats voted against it. In this committee, in September, we voted out a bill named after Kayla Hamilton who was killed by an illegal alien. Every committee Democrat voted against it.
At that committee markup, representative Crockett, our friend, referred to Kayla Hamilton as, quote, a random dead person, end quote. Democrats even shut down the federal government just recently to restore taxpayer funded health care benefits to illegal aliens. This is the democrats legacy on immigration, voting against common sense, rejecting reforms, demonizing the victims of their policies, and that's exactly what the American people resoundingly rejected last November. Foreign terrorists released into American communities, gang members unleashed onto American streets, illegal aliens crowded into American schools and hospitals, foreign nationals signed up for voter rolls, illegal alien benefits, bankrolled by hardworking American taxpayers. That is their legacy.
And at the end of it all, American communities are abandoned. American people victimized. Mothers raped. Daughters assaulted. Sisters murdered.
American cities overwhelmed, public services overrun, American generosity overburdened, taxpayer budgets overstretched. And the American people said simply we're over it. They gave congress and and the president a mandate to secure the border and fix a flawed immigration system that all too often benefits illegal aliens at the literal expense of American citizens. This bill is a step forward in fulfilling that mandate. Let's chart a new path forward.
The expedited removal of criminal aliens act moves us closer to that goal, and I urge my colleagues to support it, and I yield back.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
Finally the truth is coming out.!!! https://t.co/bAAcoLj96n
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents seven core points about the January 6 investigations and related prosecutions.
1) Original sins of government and due process concerns
- The lawless formation of the House Select Committee on January 6 led to a one-sided, due process-free process.
- The committee was gerrymandered by Speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel for the ranking member, and Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to cover that up.
- The committee conducted scripted hearings with prewritten Q&A paths and cherry-picked, highly edited audio and video.
2) Collaboration with mainstream media and narrative shaping
- The committee worked with major outlets (The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC) to blast a narrative of an insurrection.
- The speaker claims secretly recorded video shows Nancy Pelosi, her daughter, and friends admitting no real insurrection occurred.
- The combined effect of the committee’s conduct and the media blitz allegedly poisoned the jury pool in Washington, DC, and suggested that venue transfers should have been permitted.
3) Fourth Amendment concerns and the dragnet
- Many defendants were swept up in a broad dragnet that the speaker believes resembled a general warrant violating the Fourth Amendment.
- This involved geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants to telecom providers.
- People arriving after the speech and the ellipse allegedly did not see that areas normally open to the public were closed, creating a trespass trap for the unwary.
4) First Amendment rights and unequal treatment
- The Department of Justice did not treat First Amendment rights of the protesters with appropriate respect.
- The speaker contrasts the January 6 cases with the 2020 Portland protests, where nightly attacks on federal courthouses and antifa/BLM activity were characterized differently.
- The speaker asserts that insurrection labeling in Portland was more applicable to those actions than to the largely spontaneous January 6 crowd, implying selective enforcement.
5) Selective prosecution and unequal treatment
- The January 6 defendants have not been treated the same as Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who damaged property and threatened the White House.
- The speaker calls this a flat violation of equal protection of the laws and suggests broad public belief in selective prosecution.
6) Brady violations and exculpatory evidence
- Widespread Brady violations are alleged, focusing on two areas: concealed or underreported footage of the Capitol, and the large number of unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts (over 800), with the possibility that exculpatory evidence remains unseen by defendants and their lawyers.
- The committee allegedly acted like a star chamber, and there is concern that not all exculpatory material has been made available.
7) Judicial influence and misapplication of obstruction statutes
- DC federal judges are said to have been influenced by the January 6 committee’s narrative and the mainstream media.
- A statute designed to close an obstruction-of-justice loophole from Arthur Andersen/Enron is claimed to be applied to activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment, with unequal sentencing: Antifa and BLM defendants allegedly receiving lighter outcomes or settlements, while January 6 defendants face disproportionate sentences.
- The speaker concludes by expressing disagreement with the overall approach and intention to speak on these concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me make seven quick points. First, one of the original sins of government that has carried, and caused the poor treatment of the January 6 protester defendants is, the, lawless formation of the house select committee, the January 6 committee, leading to it acting in a one-sided and due process free way. That committee was gerrymandered by speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel to the ranking member. Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to try to cover that up. The committee then had a series of carefully scripted by Hollywood hearings where the entire q and a path was prewritten and meshed with cherry picked snippets of highly edited audio I'm sorry, video and audio doctored video.
The committee interviewed a thousand plus witnesses, it says, but only about 200 transcripts have been released. Second, the January 6 committee worked with regime media. The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and MSNBC, etcetera. In that way, the fake narrative that an insurrection had been had occurred on January 6 was blasted everywhere. Based on secretly recorded, video, we now have on tape Nancy Pelosi's documentary and daughter, and her friends admitting that no real insurrection ever occurred.
The collective effect of the January shameful way of proceeding, plus the reinforcing media blitz poisoned the jury pool in Washington DC. Trial venue transfers out of DC should have been permitted. Media narrative mongering indeed was also the pre original sin therefore of this entire issue because it laid the groundwork for the January 6 select committee's hatchet jobs. Third, many of the defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet that I believe violated the fourth amendment because it was the equivalent of a general warrant that our framers sought to ban. This was done through the use of geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants sent to telecom providers.
Additionally, many protesters arriving after president Trump's speech, in the ellipse in the ellipse had finished, did not see any signage that areas normally open to the public were closed that day, setting up a trespass trap for the unwary. Fourth, the justice department did not treat these cases with appropriate respect for the first amendment rights of the protesters. The twenty twenty presidential election was incredibly contentious, and many citizens in this country disagreed with mainstream media pronouncements that they should, in essence, sit down and shut up about the election and how it was conducted. By contrast, I was at the justice department getting daily updates about the Marco Hatfield Federal Courthouse in Portland being attacked night after night after night in the 2020. Insurrection is a far more appropriate moniker for that targeted antifa lawlessness than a largely spontaneously assembled crowd being agitated by tear gas and rubber bullets.
Yet, the First Amendment issues led to the self agitators in Portland being treated very differently and with special kid gloves. This takes me to my fifth point. The January 6 defendants have not been dealt with in the same fashion as the Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who engaged in terrible conduct, threatened the White House, did millions of damage in property to property in that summer in the lead up to the presidential election. This is a flat violation in terms of comparing those two categories of defendants or potential defendants of the equal protection of the laws. Many Americans think the selective prosecution on display here is blatant.
Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations as to how these defendants are being dealt with today, and I'll confine that to just two areas for our purposes today. First, the concealed or underreported footage issue around the capital. So, the house is to be commended for allowing Tucker Carlson, Julie Kelly, and John Solomon to review the footage. And second, it's hard to imagine that with 800 plus or so unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts that there's not at least some exculpatory evidence in there that is not yet been seen by the relevant defendants and their lawyers. The January 6 committee in short acted like a star chamber and there is no reason for this congress to let that go on.
Seventh and lastly, the judges on the federal district court here in Washington DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin, and in that way, they allowed the constructed mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions. And as a legal matter, they're by and large allowing a statute designed to close an obstruction of of justice loophole that Arthur Anderson exploited in the Enron debacle to be applied to entirely different activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment and should appropriately be treated differently. As a result, Antifa and BLM revolutionaries and it's not an exaggeration to call them that who engaged in worse conduct largely got off scot free and worse yet, many of them left with bags of cash from civil settlements. By contrast, the sentence is being handed down against January 6 defendants are wildly disproportionate. For all these reasons, I'm glad to be here today before you.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
Good job DOJ! Lock them up and throw away the key.!!! https://t.co/5vOCUJscA7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Justice announced the largest coordinated health care fraud takedown in its history, charging 324 defendants for alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving approximately $14,660,000,000 in false claims submitted to Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs.
Key points emphasized:
- First, these health care fraud schemes affect every hardworking American family. The announcement states that criminals didn’t just steal money from others; they stole from taxpayers who fund these programs. Every fraudulent claim, fake billing, and kickback scheme represents money taken from American taxpayers, driving up the national deficit and threatening the long-term viability of health care for seniors, disabled Americans, and vulnerable citizens. The enforcement action involves seizure of cash as well as luxury vehicles and properties, returning real money to taxpayers and to government health care programs.
- Second, there is a disturbing trend of transnational criminal organizations engaging in increasingly sophisticated schemes. The takedown identifies and charges defendants operating from Russia, Eastern Europe, Pakistan, and other foreign countries, who have infiltrated the U.S. health care system to steal taxpayer dollars. An example described involves a sophisticated operation run from Russia and Eastern Europe that bought dozens of medical supply companies in the United States and submitted more than $10,000,000,000 in fraudulent health care claims to Medicare. This operation used the stolen identities of more than 1,000,000 Americans spanning all 50 states. Federal agents intercepted and arrested key members of that organization at U.S. airports and the U.S.–Mexico border, cutting off their escape routes. The days of transnational criminal organizations using the American health care programs as their personal piggy bank are over.
- Third, 74 defendants, including medical professionals, were charged, highlighting those who fueled America’s deadly opioid crisis for personal profit. Pill mill operators who prescribed unnecessary opioids were charged, and networks of corrupt pharmacies that distributed drugs to addicts and dealers were dismantled, feeding the addiction crisis that has devastated communities. This is described as a staggering breach of trust, and the Department’s Criminal Division will prosecute these criminals aggressively, equating them with drug dealers.
- Fourth, some defendants targeted vulnerable citizens in nursing homes, individuals with disabilities, and those battling serious illnesses. Prosecutors charged seven defendants, including five medical professionals, in connection with approximately $1,000,000,000 in fraudulent claims to Medicare and other health care benefit programs for performing medically unnecessary skin grass on dying patients as they sought to spend their final days with dignity and peace. This conduct is described as callous and disturbing, reflecting a breach of trust between patients, families, and providers.
The overall message: today’s enforcement action represents the largest health care fraud takedown in American history, signaling the beginning of a new era of aggressive prosecution and data-driven prevention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you all for joining us today as we announce the largest coordinated health care fraud takedown in the history of the Department of Justice. Today marks a decisive moment in our fight to protect American taxpayers from fraudsters and to defend the integrity of America's health care system. We are announcing today charges against 324 defendants for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving approximately $14,660,000,000 in false claims submitted to Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs. In a takedown this large, I can't possibly describe all of the work that went into dismantling each scheme, but there are four key points that bear emphasizing. First, let me be clear about what these health care fraud schemes mean for every hardworking American family.
These criminals didn't just steal someone else's money. They stole from you. Every fraudulent claim, every fake billing, every kickback scheme represents money taken directly from the pockets of American taxpayers who fund these essential programs through their hard work and sacrifice. And when criminals defraud these programs, they're not just committing theft. They're driving up our national deficit and threatening the long term viability of health care for seniors, disabled Americans, and our most vulnerable citizens.
This enforcement action involves the seizure of cash as well as luxury vehicles and properties returning real money to American taxpayers and to our government health care programs. Second, we are seeing a disturbing trend of transnational criminal organizations engaging in increasingly sophisticated and complex criminal schemes that defraud the American health care system. As part of this takedown, we've identified and charged defendants operating from Russia, Eastern Europe, Pakistan, and other foreign countries. These individuals have infiltrated our health care system to steal American taxpayer dollars. As just one example, we dismantled a scheme involving a sophisticated operation run from Russia and Eastern Europe that strategically bought dozens of medical supply companies in The United States and submitted more than $10,000,000,000 in fraudulent health care claims to Medicare.
To make matters worse, these perpetrators used the stolen identities of more than 1,000,000 Americans spanning all 50 states to perpetrate this scheme and submit these false claims. But I'm pleased to report that federal agents intercepted and arrested key members of that organization at US airports and The US Mexico border cutting off their intended escape routes. The days of transnational criminal organizations using the American health care programs as their personal piggy bank are over. Third, this takedown resulted in criminal charges against 74 defendants, including medical professionals who fueled America's deadly opioid crisis for personal profit. These are not isolated instances of poor judgment.
These are calculated schemes designed to exploit Americans struggling with addiction while enriching the very people who were duty bound to help them heal. We charged pill mill operators who prescribed unnecessary opioids. We dismantled networks of corrupt pharmacies that existed solely to distribute drugs to addicts and dealers. Feeding the addiction crisis that has devastated so many American communities. This is not health care.
It is a staggering breach of trust. And under my leadership, the criminal division will prosecute these criminals as aggressively as we would any drug dealer because that's exactly what they are. Fourth, many of the defendants charged as part of this takedown specifically targeted our most vulnerable citizens, elderly Americans in nursing homes, individuals with disabilities, those battling serious illnesses, and more. For example, our prosecutors charged seven defendants, including five medical professionals in connection with approximately $1,000,000,000 in fraudulent claims to Medicare and other health care benefit programs for performing medically unnecessary skin grass on dying patients as they were seeking to spend their final days with dignity and peace. That conduct is exactly as callous and disturbing as it sounds.
Patients and their families trusted these providers with their lives. Instead of receiving care, they became victims of elaborate criminal schemes. Today's enforcement action represents the largest health care fraud takedown in American history. But it's not the end. It's the beginning of a new era of aggressive prosecution and data driven prevention.
Thank you.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
I love Senator Kennedy! He’s a national treasure.!!! https://t.co/Dl5CiUmOg6
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I'm John Kennedy. I'm a United States senator, though I have tried to rise above it."
"And this is my new book."
"It's not a policy book. It's a storybook."
"It'll help you understand why normal in Washington DC is a setting on the dryer."
"It will help you understand why United States senators are not like most teenagers."
"They're all over 40."
"I explained in this book what the senate is really like, what president Biden's really like behind the scenes, what president Trump's really like."
"I have stories about everything from the media to Chuck Grassley to Ted Cruz to Sasquatch, you name it."
"I even have a a picture, a naked picture of Chuck Schumer in the shower."
"Not really, but I thought that might help sell the books."
"So, this book, it it's far reaching."
"It'll make you think."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm John Kennedy. I'm a United States senator, though I have tried to rise above it. And this is my new book. It's not a policy book. It's a storybook.
It'll help you understand why normal in Washington DC is a setting on the dryer. It will help you understand why United States senators are not like most teenagers. They're all over 40. I explained in this book what the senate is really like, what president Biden's really like behind the scenes, what president Trump's really like. I have stories about everything from the media to Chuck Grassley to Ted Cruz to Sasquatch, you name it.
I even have a a picture, a naked picture of Chuck Schumer in the shower. Not really, but I thought that might help sell the books. So, this book, it it's far reaching. It'll make you think. It might make you laugh, and it'll probably make you day drink.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
Boom! This is exactly how these people should be treated.!!! https://t.co/0t8PouvpzL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 pressed on alleged data abuses in CHNV supporter applications. The speaker cited: “the same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHNV supporter applications” and that “that happened at least 3,200 times.” He also claimed: “the same phone number was used on at least 20 different supporter applications. At least 3,300 times.” Asked if the report was accurate, Speaker 1 said he did not have the report but did not dispute the figures. Additional findings cited include: “The same email address was used on at least 20 different supporter applications nearly 2,000 times.” “the same exact 184 word text response to a question on the supporter application was used on more than 1,800 such applications by nearly 190 CHNV supporters.” “More than four sixty nonexistent zip codes were used on supporter applications on behalf of more than 2,800 CHNV aliens.” As of 08/06/2024, “DHS had approved more than 80,000 CHNV support supporters who were on in The US on a temporary basis.” 224 CHNV parolees; 170 additional parolees, non CHNV; 28,322 TPS holders; 19,865 SLEs; 311 DACA recipients; 1,300+ aliens on temporary visas; 64 refugees; 1,912 conditional permanent residents. The program is described as rife with fraud and was closed down but not fixed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Asked questions you couldn't answer, so that's why I gave a statement. Do you agree that the same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHNV supporter applications?
Speaker 1: So first, let me start by saying
Speaker 0: So these are yes or no questions. So yes or no?
Speaker 1: I I just wanna make clear that that the role that USCIS plays is on the supporters.
Speaker 0: And I'm asking about supporter applications.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm sorry. Can you repeat that question then? I I heard it as a parole the parolee.
Speaker 0: No. The same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHNV supporter applications. That's the question
Speaker 1: I Sorry.
Speaker 0: You're aware of that?
Speaker 1: So, yes. I am very aware
Speaker 0: of That happened at least 3,200 times.
Speaker 1: I don't have the exact number.
Speaker 0: That's according to DHS's report.
Speaker 1: Okay. I
Speaker 0: don't You have don't dispute DHS's report.
Speaker 1: No. I absolutely will not
Speaker 0: And also the same phone number was used on at least 20 different supporter applications. At least 3,300 times. That's according to the report. Do you agree that that report's accurate?
Speaker 1: I don't have that report in front of me, but
Speaker 0: I'm reading
Speaker 1: from it. Yes. But I don't have it in front of me, and I would prefer
Speaker 0: So you would dispute it?
Speaker 1: No. I'm not disputing what I
Speaker 0: am saying. So you would deflect and ram ramble around. You don't disagree with that number. You don't think I'm deliberately cherry picking number and just saying, oh, I'm just throwing this stuff out. I'm giving you the numbers from the report.
Do you trust me on that? Do you at least trust me that far?
Speaker 1: Yes. I I agree
Speaker 0: with that number. The same email address was used on at least 20 different supporter applications nearly 2,000 times. You agree with that?
Speaker 1: Sir, if if there is a situation where we have Okay. Here concerns of fraud and integrity
Speaker 0: Look.
Speaker 1: We take action in USCIS, and that is exactly what we have done with regard to CHNV. Where
Speaker 0: we Okay. So let's let's let's let's clarify here. So I'm laying foundation and and you don't really wanna admit that these there's this much rampant fraud here. You're trying to tell me that when you find fraud, we cure it. And yet nearly 2,000 times yet an the same email address used on 20 different supporter applications.
The same exact 184 word text response to a question on the supporter application was used on more than 1,800 such applications by nearly 190 different CHNV supporters. More than four sixty nonexistent zip codes were used on supporter applications on behalf of more than 2,800 CHNV aliens. So you see, you can dance around and say you don't have the report in front of you and whatnot, but but these are the facts. This program is rife with fraud. As of 08/06/2024, DHS had approved more than 80,000 CHNV support supporters who were on in The US on a temporary basis.
Temporary basis. I'm gonna give you some numbers. 224 CHNV parolees approved as CHNV supporters. That seems awkward. 170 additional parolees, non CHNV approved as CHNV supporters.
28,322 temporary protected status holders approved as CHNV supporters. 19,865 SLEs approved as CHNV supporters. 311 DACA recipients approved as CHNV supporters. 1,300 plus aliens in The US on temporary visas approved to CHMV supporters. 64 refugees approved to CHMV supporters.
1,912 conditional permanent residents approved to CHMV supporters. That is the program that you are administering. That's the section that you're administering. That's the supporters. I'm not talking the aliens.
I'm not getting into the the violation of law of of of The US code eleven eighty two when the use of parole is supposed to be on this case by case basis where secretary Mayorkas himself has sat here and under oath said, it's supposed to be on a case by case basis. I'm not getting into that. What I'm getting into is a program beside the USCS CIS supposed to, actually administer, and that is the supporter applications. And the fraud was so rapid, you closed down the program. But you didn't fix it.
It's still ongoing. We're waiting for the next report to confirm that these things are still going on because it wasn't fixed. Mister chairman, time's up. I'll yield back.
Speaker 1: Mister chairman, can I respond to the
Speaker 0: to the question? Please. Sure. There was no question because I asked questions you couldn't answer, so that's why I gave a statement. There was no question for you, ma'am.
@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel
That’s it’s not true 💯!!! ICE is investigating properly, Whoever is illegal will be deported — color doesn’t matter. https://t.co/R28XdH0Lkz