TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NetworksManager
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
@colleen11543801 @GwynninPA Indeed. Very deadly. Cooler heads must prevail. We must all push for peace. These people have been fighting for 1000s of years. Here's a revealing clip from when President Truman established Israel in Palestine. Now Israel says Palestine never existed lol https://t.co/LVBK4aqU8D
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Truman stated that recognizing Israel involved compromising with Arabs and dividing Palestine. Both Jews and Arabs opposed him, with Jews allegedly wanting to displace Arabs into the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, while Arabs wanted to displace Jews into the Red Sea. Truman aimed to find a Jewish homeland while being just to Arabs, but both groups were angry with him. Despite opposition, he pursued what he believed was right with Congressional support. He noted that some Jewish people opposed him because they wanted to hold Palestine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But don't think that decision to recognize Israel is an easy one. I had to make a compromise with the Arabs and divide Palestine. The Jews wanted to chase all the Arabs into the Tigris and Euphrates River, and the Arabs want to chase all the Jews into the Red Sea. And I was trying what I was trying to do was to find a homeland for the Jews and still be just for the Arabs. But when you go into a thing of that kind, the people you help most are the ones that get most angry with you.
Both of them were against me on the situation. But as President of The United States, I paid no attention to them, carried out what I thought was right. And I had the support of the Congress, and I could do it, which is unusual in these days. Can you tell us specifically that a lot of Jewish people were against you too? A: Oh, well, there were a lot of Jewish people against me because they wanted to hold the Palestine.
As I say, they wanted to drive all the Arabs into the Tigris from Euphrates' rivers. Q: Okay.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Douglas Macgregor, retired U.S. Army colonel on Tucker speaking the truth that nobody wants to hear...but you do...once you understand the consequences. This is a must watch!! 27 minutes of truth that every patriot needs. God bless. #MAGA #ceasefire https://t.co/98zbWXbGfW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US may be heading to war with Iran, with Republicans encouraging it. Senator Graham suggests bombing Iranian oil refineries if Hezbollah attacks Israel. Douglas MacGregor believes the chosen destination is Armageddon, with little appreciation for the implications. He notes 20% of the world's oil passes through the Straits of Hormuz, and Iran has missiles capable of hitting targets 1,200 miles away.
MacGregor warns that US bases in Iraq and Syria would be targeted, and Hezbollah could cause trouble within the US. He claims that if the US attacks Iran based on Hezbollah's actions, it risks conflict with Russia and potentially Turkey. Sanctions haven't stopped Iran from developing advanced missiles and cyber warfare capabilities.
MacGregor argues the US military is weak and unprepared for war with Iran. He believes destroying Hamas would mean annihilating Gaza, a form of collective punishment. He also raises concerns about terrorism in the US due to open borders and the presence of Hezbollah. MacGregor suggests the conflict could harm the US economy, lead to terror attacks, and that the US has cast moral turpitude to the side. He notes some leaders may be thinking clearly about the situation, but their voices aren't being heard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We seem to be heading to war with Iran. Certainly, the Biden administration is pushing us in that direction. What's new and interesting and ominous is that very few Republicans, the opposition party, are pushing back. Instead, some of the party's leaders are encouraging it. Here, for example, is senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina from last weekend on NBC.
Speaker 1: You said this week that the only way to keep the war from escalating is to hold Iran accountable part of what you're talking about now, and that it might mean bombing their oil refineries. Have you had any discussions with the Biden administration about this?
Speaker 2: A bit. Here's my message. If Hezbollah, which is a proxy of Iran, launches a massive attack on Israel, I will consider that a threat to the to to the state of Israel, existential in nature. I will introduce a resolution in The United States Senate to allow military action by The United States in conjunction with Israel to knock Iran out of the oil business. Iran, if you escalate this war, we're coming for you.
Speaker 1: Are you effectively poised to declare war on Iran? That's very strong language.
Speaker 2: I am poised to use military force to destroy the source of funding for Hamas and Hezbollah.
Speaker 0: You know, that's Lindsey Graham. Few others in the Republican Party will be that open about their intentions, but very few disagree with him. Certainly not in private. They agree. So what would war with Iran mean?
Well, it's hard to know because virtually no one who's talking about it in public is operating from a deep interest in America's interest. Is this good for us or is it not? Former colonel Douglas MacGregor is the CEO of Our Country, Our Choice, and one of the first pro people we turn to for analysis of events like this because he is interested in what happens to The United States. He joins us now. Doug, thank you for coming on.
Do you think that we are moving toward war with Iran?
Speaker 3: Yes. I do. And it looks like the chosen destination is indeed Armageddon. There doesn't seem to be any real appreciation for the implications for us and and frankly for Europe and the world as well as The Middle East of such action. You know, take for an example just on the economic side, about 20% of the world's oil passes through the Straits Of Hormuz every month.
Probably 25% of liquefied natural gas, and you're talking about shutting down two to 3,000,000 barrels a day of oil from Iran. You know, this entire region is involved in the war. This is not an Iranian monopoly by any stretch of the imagination. But the point is that when we're looking at ten year treasury yields up over 5% and people are increasingly convinced that the Fed has lost control, the economic side of the house is catastrophe. Now when you look at the military side, you have to look at the arsenal of missiles that Iran possesses, and they can reach out 1,200 miles with great precision, very high explosive conventional warheads that would do enormous damage destroying whole city blocks in places like Haifa, Tel Aviv, even Jerusalem, though I doubt they would attack Jerusalem.
The the bottom line is that we need to think this through, and everyone right now is emoting. There is no thinking anywhere as far as I can tell. The only possible exception may be amazingly enough mister Erdogan in Turkey who came out this morning and indicated he was willing to mediate, the dispute between Israel and Hamas. Whether or not anyone in Washington or Israel is interested in talking, I don't know. But if we could sideline Turkey and keep Turkey out of the fight, that would ultimately help Israel enormously.
Speaker 0: So what would happen to The United States if we followed senator Graham's advice and just began bombing critical infrastructure in Iran? What what would happen then?
Speaker 3: Well, all of the bases that we have in Iraq and Syria, unfortunately, where we still have over a thousand Americans, all of those would be targeted. And this time, they would target them accurately, and this destruction would be wholesale. I would expect trouble here at home and in The United States because of the open border. Hezbollah has a very large operation in Mexico. There are no doubt many, many, many Hezbollah agents inside The United States.
We can only begin to imagine the kind of trouble they could cause. The missile and space program in Iran is very, very advanced as is their cyber warfare capability. All of these things would be brought to bear against us. But what's most important, I think, for Americans to understand is if we attack Iran on the basis of Hezbollah's alleged willingness to attack Israel if Israel invades Gaza, we will end up in a fight with Russia. Russia will not sit by quietly and watch Iran destroyed by The United States air and naval power in the region.
And once Russia enters this, it it becomes much more than just a local conflict, maybe more than just a regional war. We haven't thought this through. We need to do that. And I doubt seriously at that point that the Turks would be able to stay out. The Turks are Sunni Muslims.
They are the de facto leaders of the Sunni Muslim world. They have the largest armed forces in the region. They are in close proximity to Israel. They could move forces south through Syria very rapidly. And I'm sure Bashar al Assad, assuming he even survives the opening of this campaign, would not obstruct them.
Speaker 0: So so many questions, but just to back up one click. You described Iran's missile arsenal, but Iran is a country that's been the subject of very intense sanction regime from The United States increased by the last president, Donald Trump. But for a long time, how is Iran still such a powerful country militarily given those sanctions? It sounds like maybe they didn't work.
Speaker 3: Oh, no. I think that's that's an important point, Tucker, and you're absolutely right. We place so much value on these sanctions and assume that they have this profound impact. Normally, sanctions harm the population in terms of lowering its standard of living, making life more difficult for the everyday citizen, but it doesn't fundamentally alter the policy or the goals and objectives of the government. And this is something that I don't think we understand.
The same thing is true for for Hamas and Gaza. You know, you you want to go after Hamas. You want to destroy it. I think everyone with a sound mind is interested in the destruction of Hamas. But do you want to kill hundreds of thousands of people in order to get at Hamas?
That's the question. We have the same problem in Iran. Our sanctions have not harmed the regime's ability to develop and build very, very complex and sophisticated missiles. These missiles are very accurate now. There are hundreds, if not thousands.
And the long range missiles, the 1,200 mile range theater ballistic missiles are a very serious threat to us in the region and to Israel. And the sanctions have had no impact there. If anything, the Iranians have pulled together the best human capital in their country, the best engineers, the best thinkers, and put them to work primarily on missile technology and on cyber warfare. And that's where we stand right now. We have to expect the worst as a result if we strike Iran.
Speaker 0: How is the US military, do you think, having spent your life in it, leading troops in combat and at the Pentagon, positioned to respond to war with with Iran right now? Are we in a strong position or not in your view?
Speaker 3: No. I don't think we're in a strong position. I think we're probably at the weakest point in, our recent history. I think you've got to look at the realities of new weapon systems, new capabilities. The United States Navy, if it's going to preserve its capability at sea, is probably going to be compelled to operate somewheres north and West of Sicily.
If it comes within closer range, then it falls into this envelope where the Iranians can strike it. And as I said before, we have to assume the Russians will come into this. Once you move into the Eastern Mediterranean, you are vulnerable to the Kinshaw missiles and other missiles, cruise missiles and hypersonic missiles that the Russians have. This makes it very difficult to fly strikes in support of the Israeli Defense Force against Ismaila because now you're flying a very long distance, you deliver your ordnance, you have to land in Israel in order to refuel. Israel is going to operate under a hail, if not a rainstorm of missiles and rockets, making it very, very dangerous to do so.
So our naval power, while substantial, may not have the desired impact on the ground that we would like. And then finally, we have no real army anymore. The army is down to perhaps, what, 450,000. How much of that is ready to fight is open to debate. Much of it is sitting in Eastern Europe right now.
We we don't have the means to rapidly ship a large force of 80 to a 100,000 troops on the ground into the region, which means that we're reliant on special forces and right now 2,000 marines and perhaps 2,000 special forces and special operations forces. That's not gonna make much of a dent. And as we've seen quite recently within the last twenty four hours or so, some of our special ops forces and Israeli special ops forces went into Gaza to reconnoitre, to plan for where they might want to go to free hostages and and make an impact. And they were shot to pieces and took heavy losses as I understand it. I think that's where we're headed.
And I don't see that as a win for Israel in any way, shape, or form, and I certainly think it's very dangerous for us. You know, as I've tried to point out to a number of people, until Britain entered World War one, it was just another European war. Once Britain entered it, it became a global war. Well, once we are a co belligerent, we enter this thing, it's gonna be very difficult for Russia and Turkey not to also come into this fight against us because they will not tolerate the sort of collective punishment that Israel plans for Gaza.
Speaker 0: The US military does have an awful lot of generals, however, as you pointed out, multiples of the number we had, the absolute number we had during World War two. And they're paid to think about this stuff. It why has it dawned on no one apparently who's spoken publicly anyway that this this could this could really harm our country gravely. Why is no one saying that?
Speaker 3: Well, I'm sure there are people in the US military who are aware, but let's be frank. Most of the people at the top of the military have never operated under artillery fire or rocket fire. They haven't seen direct fire combat. They haven't seen real war per se. Remember, we've had the luxury of sitting around forward operating bases and striking opponents that were armed with AK 40 sevens and command detonated mines, occasional mortar or rocket.
Very, very low intensity combat. This is a high end conventional war that we're looking at with the potential to go nuclear, which obviously I don't think we or the Russians want to happen, but we have the wild card card in Israel. They do have a nuclear capability. We don't know what the tripwire is for them to employ such a weapon. At that point, of course, all bets are off, and and I think most of the world would turn against Israel.
Right now, they just have to worry about the Muslim world against them. It would certainly widen if they went that far. This there are too many unknowns and uncertainties here. And, you know, everyone always assumes at the beginning of such a conflict, well, it'll be contained. We'll only have to fight these people, Hamas, maybe Hezbollah.
It never works out that way. These things always last longer than everyone thinks. The resources required are much more profound than what we anticipated. And remember, we've already used up many of our war stocks in Ukraine, and we've left Ukraine in a state of ruins, places on life support, a half a million dead. What are we going to do to Israel if we press ahead down this road?
And it seems, listening to secretary of state Blinken this morning, who more and more sounds like our commander in chief, that there is no room for negotiation, no room for mediation. Hamas must be destroyed. We must go into Gaza. If so, I think we're on this very dangerous road to Armageddon.
Speaker 0: What is the objective of the IDF and of of Blinken of The United States and Israel in this short term? I destroy Hamas, but what is what does that mean?
Speaker 3: Well, to destroy Hamas in the minds, I think, of policymakers in Washington as well as in Israel is to systematically root them out and kill them in Gaza. Now, let's be frank. When you go into an urban environment, you can't pick or choose your targets very easily. First of all, no matter how well trained you are, you're moving into an area that is rubbled. They're ruins.
It's very difficult to negotiate in that when I say negotiate, I mean, negotiate the terrain through the rubble. You don't know where the enemy is going to pop up. Once you destroy all these buildings, he can be anywhere. So you're gonna take losses going in. But more important, once you start going in there, you're gonna end up killing whatever you find because the soldier, the Israeli soldier, the American soldier, much the same, They want to live.
They wanna survive. When in doubt, pull the trigger. They're not going to stop and say, now wait a minute. Before I shoot, I really need to think about this because that may be a civilian or there may be a family there. That's not gonna happen.
You can't expect that. So the notion that this is a kind of warfare that is so precise that it can avoid avoid so called collateral damage is just nonsense. We can't expect miracles from the IDF or our own troops, which means that you're gonna annihilate everything in Gaza. And remember, the Israelis would like to push the population out. The problem is when you push the population out, if you did into Egypt, you're gonna run into trouble with the Egyptians.
But even if you manage to get them there, you're only moving the problem that confronts you 20 miles, 30 miles away. In other words, killing people isn't going to solve the problem. But it's very attractive at the moment and it's very difficult to talk people out of it.
Speaker 0: Do do you believe American troops will be in engaged physically present in the invasion of Gaza?
Speaker 3: I'm sure they will because we have American citizens who are hostages. And we've already made it clear that we will assist and support the Israelis in freeing those hostages. Again, the problem is how do you get the hostages out when you're fighting in this extraordinarily dirty and complex environment? What's to prevent the hostages from simply being executed as soon as you move in force into Gaza. I think the Israelis know that.
I think our leadership in Washington knows it. They may have even decided that if that happens, that's tragic, but the ultimate goal of destroying Hamas demands this. Again, it's the issue of collective punishment. I would encourage Americans everywhere to listen to King Abdullah of Jordan's speech in Cairo just a couple of days ago where he made it clear that he agreed with the, you know, the abhorrence of what had happened in Israel and and lows Hamas for its barbarity and savagery. But he also goes on to point out that collective punishment meted out to 2,000,000 people is unacceptable both under international law and for humanitarian reasons.
That's the problem. And as Americans see more destruction and more and more film footage and photographs come out of Gaza showing children, women, old men dying, being killed. The support for Israel is going to erode. And at the same time, the anger and hatred inside the region, which already dislikes Israel, is going to be phenomenal. So Israel is doing something that I think no one has ever accomplished, at least not in my lifetime, and that is uniting Sunni and Shia against itself.
That's why I think we have an obligation to save Israel from itself, but that's not a popular position. Right now, it's bombs away and everyone is cheering.
Speaker 0: What about the argument often articulated including by leading presidential candidates recently, that considerations like the ones you just raised, like the long term effects of decisions or global public opinion, downstream terror attacks, thinking about any of that is a violation of principle and you're basically giving into the terrorists by weighing any of it. How would you respond to that?
Speaker 3: Most politicians, follow public opinion. Right now, opinion supports violence against Hamas, if that includes the destruction of Gaza, so be it. We support it. Very few people look beyond that and understand the larger consequences. In the last century, or I I guess I should say, in the early twentieth century, the great powers intervened on more than one occasion to prevent Turkey from being destroyed, not because they loved the Ottoman Turks, but because they saw the alternative being chaos.
Turkey had a role to play. Therefore, we want to preserve it. We have to think about Egypt. Egypt has been a good strategic partner for Israel. They've kept the peace there for decades.
The Egyptians are now in a very difficult position. At least a 100,000 Egyptian troops have been moved towards the border with Gaza involving several divisions. Under great pressure from public opinion in the Arab world, in the Muslim world, they may have to engage the Israelis because no one will protect the population in Gaza. That that's a terrible, terrible possibility, one that we don't want because if that happens to Egypt and Hezbollah attacks from the North, that will bring in everyone else. And we're suddenly confronting a war on a regional level that is going to harm us economically, physically in many ways, but could threaten the very existence of Israel, which I think is the root problem here.
We don't want Israel's existence threatened. We want to save Israel. We want to keep it intact, but we may not be able to do that if this war runs out of control. And let's be frank. Historically, wars run out of control.
They move in directions you never anticipated. So if you think you can plot this this route forward as Lindsey Graham thinks, you're crazy. Once this is unleashed, it's not manageable anymore.
Speaker 0: You you, said a couple of you made reference couple of times to the American citizens being held by Hamas. What do we know about them?
Speaker 3: Well, I think most of them, are American citizens who happen to be Jewish, who are there to celebrate, during the holiday period or participate in this music festival we've heard so much about. You know, I I don't think they ever anticipated anything like this happening. Yeah. The problem is, as we've said before, extracting them from this haystack is is nigh on to impossible.
Speaker 0: What about the concerns of about terrorism in The United States in the wake of all of this?
Speaker 3: Well, I think they're very valid. Yeah. I I think these concerns are very, very valid. We've had open borders now for the last two and a half years, but we've had an illegal migration problem for the last three plus decades. We don't know who's in the country.
We really don't. No one at homeland homeland security can tell you who is here. The Europeans face something quite similar. They were bullied into admitting millions of Muslims from The Middle East and Africa. We've been bullied by our government to open the borders and let in effectively anybody who wants to come.
So we don't know who's here, but we do know that Hamas as well as Hezbollah have positions in Mexico. Of the two, Hezbollah is much stronger, much larger, and much better equipped and financed. So we have to expect that once Hezbollah is in the war and we are against them and Iran that much of our infrastructure will be at risk. Something is bad or potentially even worse than nine eleven could happen here. This brings us back to the whole issue of immigration and border security.
We've essentially ignored it. The same politicians who are pushing for war against virtually everyone in The Middle East, which is what it boils down to in the final analysis, don't seem to have thought carefully about protecting us or our borders from all of the terrible things that we've seen in Israel. How much damage could these same people do to us in a shopping mall in the space of fifteen minutes? It doesn't take much imagination to understand how dangerous this is.
Speaker 0: Do you think that this war, if it comes, and it as as you said, it seems like it is, how will that affect American domestic politics? War traditionally has been used by the people in power to shut down dissent. Can you imagine that happening in this case?
Speaker 3: Well, I think they'll try. Fortunately, thanks to people like Elon Musk who bought Twitter and ended the censorship or suspended it, the truth does get through and reach Americans. But Americans will figure out pretty quickly if two things tend to happen at once. You have the the war overseas and the war here, but remember the economy and the and the financial condition right now. If you turn on any of the business channels for the first time in my memory, lots and lots of analysts are coming on and talking about the Fed having lost control, the rising interest rates, you know, the inability to manage and cope with the sovereign national debt of thirty three trillion.
And that's the tip of a proverbial iceberg. We already have Americans who are struggling with inflation anyway. Now we're looking at potentially scarcity. We've drained our strategic oil reserve for all intents and purposes. If the Strait Of Hormuz is shut down, if the Suez Canal is closed, we're in a lot of trouble in the short run.
That's for sure. How rapidly can we recover from all of this? How many refineries can we put back into operation? How much drilling can we do quickly? The answer is not very much.
So draining that strategic oil reserve was a very serious mistake.
Speaker 0: But we'll be as we become impoverished and chaotic in subject to these terror attacks, we'll be winning important moral victories, don't you think?
Speaker 3: Well, in our effort to stand at Israel's side and help protect Israel, we have taken a different route and cast moral turpitude to the side. In other words, how do you help one without committing a war crime against the other? This is the problem with collective punishment. This is the problem with annihilating Gaza and trying to sweep out its population. Unacceptable to us as Americans.
I don't think if you sat down any of Israel's most ardent supporters in The United States and said, are you willing to trade the lives of several 100,000 people in Gaza for the lives taken in Israel by Hamas. After all, Hamas and Palestinian jihad were the fighters. They lost 1,500. There were 3,000 involved in the several waves of the attack. They're dead.
Now we're looking at perhaps 5,000 civilians dead. How many more will we witness? Is that somehow another justified morally? And I think a lot of Americans will struggle with that. That's why I say it would be best if we had a cooling off period.
I'm glad that the Israelis are waiting for additional naval power to arrive on station in the Mediterranean and also for additional equipment, theater ballistic missile defense and so forth. But we need to use this time to think carefully about how far we want to go because right now, it's a one way street to regional war. And I don't think anybody really wants that if they think about it carefully. Therefore, you know, looking at someone like Erdogan, however slippery we may consider him to be, his willingness to mediate is a bright light in an otherwise very dark sky. And we should look to that because we don't want the regional war.
It will destroy us economically. We're already in bad shape. We've already suffered because of the foolish intervention in Ukraine to try to destroy Russia. Now we have Russia more powerful militarily than it's been since the eighties, and it's poised to enter on the side of Iran. We should all give that some serious thought.
Speaker 0: Last question. Do you know of any leaders in The United States, political leaders at the Pentagon, within the Biden administration who are thinking clearly about this, which is to say, who are framing their thoughts on it around what's best for The United States long term? Is anybody thinking that way?
Speaker 3: Yes. Yeah. Yes. There are. The problem is none of them hold high positions in government and none of their voices or their analyses or their viewpoints are going to reach anybody in power.
I think you have to listen carefully to what secretary of state Blinken said. He was absolutely unambiguous. We are going to destroy Hamas, whatever that takes. That means regional war, frankly. And anybody who thinks that people are going to say, oh, no.
We're afraid of America. We're not going to risk that. They're wrong. They are not afraid to risk attacking Israel for fear of coming into confrontation with us. We are not the power we were in 1991 and they know that.
And economically, our position is very fragile. Let's face it. So the bottom line is, yes, there are people out there, but they're not being heard and they're not going to be heard in the current environment.
Speaker 0: Doug McGregor, thank you so much for that. Appreciate it.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Honeybee venom contains melittin, which can destroy cancer cells by rupturing their membranes, potentially leading to less toxic cancer treatments. https://t.co/gCfnUcmR66
Video Transcript AI Summary
Honey bee venom can rapidly kill aggressive breast cancer cells and reduce tumor growth in animal models, without harming healthy cells. Bee venom contains a cancer-killing component called melittin, which researchers reproduced synthetically with similar anticancer effects.
Melittin can kill cancer cells within 60 minutes by forming holes in the cell membrane, causing cell death. It also disrupts signaling pathways that cancer cells use to communicate, replicate, and grow. Melittin, when combined with chemotherapy drugs, is more effective at killing tumors because it allows the drugs to enter the target cells more easily. The venom was found to be very efficient in reducing tumor growth in mice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Honey bee venom can rapidly kill aggressive breast cancer cells. Scientists found that the venom was extremely effective in reducing tumor growth in animal models. The venom managed to kill cancer cells without harming normal healthy cells. Scientists discovered that bee venom contains a cancer killing component called melittin. The researchers managed to reproduce the melittin synthetically in the lab and found it had most of the anticancer effects.
Melittin was able to kill cancer cells within just 60 minutes. This component enters the surface of the cell or the plasma membrane and forms holes or pores causing the cell to die. Scientists also found that Melitin was jamming the main messaging or signaling pathways that allow cancer cells to communicate with each other in order to replicate and grow. When combined with chemotherapy drugs, melittin was found to be more effective at killing tumors. The holes that were created by melittin on the surface of cancer cells allowed chemotherapy drugs to enter the target cells.
It worked very efficiently in reducing tumor growth in mice.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that Free Masons have a unique code of conduct that allows us freedom, provided we issue a public warning first. I recall the "Conspiracy theory rock" skit from SNL in 1998, which was never aired again, serving as a warning. Similarly, the 2012 Olympic Games opening ceremonies hinted at a future pandemic, despite being dismissed by fact checkers. There are instances of scenes being cancelled after warnings, reinforcing the idea that public acknowledgment is crucial.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Free Masons have a code of conduct. We are allowed to do whatever we want, but we have to warn the public first. “Conspiracy theory rock” aired on SNL back in 1998. It was never aired again. You have been warned. https://t.co/2xU7c4zOss
Video Transcript AI Summary
PCBs are mentioned in the context of Westinghouse facing fraud allegations. The fraud involved a team that made defective votes, characterized as an unreported crime. There's also a reference to a boycott against Westinghouse for allegedly operating nuclear bomb plants to save money. This last point is described as a footnote, which the speaker suggests offers protection from doubters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What are PCBs? Like when Westinghouse pursued for fraud? Which time? The team made defective votes. It was an unreported crime.
Or when it was boycotting for operating nuclear bomb plants just to squeeze a dime. That's a footnote by the way. A footnote protects you from folks who doubt
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
In 2012 you were warned of the upcoming pandemic during the Olympic Games opening ceremonies in London. (2) https://t.co/HKgwBbNOFh
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
This scene was never shown again, and the series was cancelled. (3) https://t.co/h4abF3e0b4
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
This was aired Nov 14, 1999 (4) https://t.co/5dwx7uzAHB
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
OMG they lied to us about cholesterol levels too? https://t.co/6nmxEIFCRT
Video Transcript AI Summary
40 years ago, a cholesterol level of 300 was considered fine, but now it's not. Cholesterol protects the brain and is crucial for hormone production. Medications that lower cholesterol can lead to dementia, muscle loss, and other health issues. The Framingham Heart Study aimed to link cholesterol to heart disease but found no connection after 40 years. Surprisingly, high cholesterol levels may protect against Alzheimer's.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 40 years ago, it was perfectly fine for a cholesterol of 300. Now has everyone got that? 300. What are you told today if you're 300? Last year in Maryland, I was talking to a lady in her seventies who was a pathologist.
She said I used to do all the testing on blood cholesterol levels. We considered a cholesterol level of 350 perfectly fine. What are you told today at Do Do you know the fattiest organ in the body is the brain, and cholesterol is used to protect the brain against chemicals, heavy metals? We've been deceived. And the cholesterol lowering medication, its side effect is dementia, muscle wasting, Alzheimer's, breast cancer, vitamin d deficiency because our sex hormones are made from cholesterol.
And if we don't have enough vitamin d, we can't get the minerals into our bones to have strong bones. So what do we got now? Osteoporosis. It's all about precision balance. We need that cholesterol.
Framium heart study, been going for 40 years, set up to prove that cholesterol causes heart disease, still hasn't 40 years later. But you know what it did show? People with high cholesterol levels don't get Alzheimer's. Now do you need a moment, Silas, to digest that one?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Video by @TheMilkBarTV shows the timing of the July 13, 2024 events as civilians began yelling at authorities about the would-be assassin on the roof with a rifle. Do you think this was negligence by Secret Service or a coordinated assassination attempt on President Trump? https://t.co/HVMZZsvCwy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Someone is on the roof during a rally. Shots are fired, but it is unclear if President Trump was hit. Secret Service is seen reacting.
Speaker 1: Illegal immigration was at its lowest when I left office. The current president caused a surge in illegal immigration.
Translator: Shots were fired at a rally, and it is uncertain if President Trump was hit. Illegal immigration was lowest when I left office, but surged under the current president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Pacific. Yeah. Yeah. Someone's on top of the roof. Look.
There he is right there. Oh. Right there. You see him? He's laying down.
See him? Yeah. He's laying down. What's happening?
Speaker 1: In recorded history, we had the best border. In fact, if they could ever put up a chart I don't know if they can do it. Do you guys have access to that chart that I love so much? You don't mind if I go off teleprompter, do you? Because these teleprompters are so damn boring.
I try and explain that. Oh, there's a wow. You guys are doing it. They're getting better with time. My guys, take a look at that chart.
Take a look
Speaker 0: at the arrow on the bottom.
Speaker 1: See the big red red arrow? Right? So that's when I left office. That was the lowest point and that comes right from the government services, comes right out of border patrol. Take a look at that.
So that arrow is the lowest amount of illegal immigration ever in recorded history into our country. And then and then the worst president in the history of our country took over, and look what happened to our country. Probably 20,000,000 people.
Speaker 0: We are live right now at the top rally on. We're shot right here, Mike. We don't know that president Trump has been shot. We know he hit the ground. We do not know that president Trump has
Speaker 1: been shot.
Speaker 0: He's up. He's up. Shots are still continuing to be fired.
Speaker 2: He's giving a thumbs up, everybody. He's giving a thumbs up.
Speaker 0: Breaking news right now. This is Vanessa Broussard. Yeah. According to Butler, Pennsylvania, we hear shots fired at the rally, not 10 to 15 minutes after president Trump arrived. He hit the ground.
Unheard of yet if he has been hit by gunfire. When's the Secret Service quickly erupted. We can see the guy down. The snipers on the building behind the He might be a little I think they hit him because the guy is so what's that?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
More information about Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle who has close ties to the Cheneys, the Bidens and is responsible for the J6 deleted texts scandal. After the attempted assassination do you think she should be allowed anywhere near President Trump? https://t.co/ofGk7Vve5V
Video Transcript AI Summary
A 28-year veteran who was part of the team that evacuated Vice President Dick Cheney on 9/11 and served on Vice President Biden's protective detail was named director in 2022. The agency faced controversy for deleting most text messages from January 6th, citing a data migration. The timing and volume of messages deleted raised suspicion among Americans. The agency defended its actions, stating that integrity is crucial and there was no malicious intent behind the deletions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She would know. The 28 year veteran was on the team that evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 9/11, and she served on then vice president Biden's protective detail. He named her director in mid 2022 amid a swirl of controversy over the agency deleting nearly all of its text messages from January 6th. The agency says that was due to a data migration. System migrations happen.
But I think for a lot of Americans, it just doesn't pass the smell test given the timing and the volume of messages deleted.
Speaker 1: Well, it's unfortunate that that would be the assumption that people would make. Our integrity is everything, and there was nothing nefarious attached to that.
Speaker 0: Their integrity had
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Did you notice comedian Jack Black make a birthday wish live onstage at a Tenacious D Concert: "Don't miss Trump next time." Do you notice a pattern?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Old Sleepy tells us that the FBI is in control of the coverup….n I mean investigation. 👀 Do you think they will quickly try to assassinate Trump again? https://t.co/DlYg495Sou
Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke with Donald Trump, wishing him well after the incident. We mourn the victim's death and pray for the injured. Violence has no place in America. We must unite as a nation. The FBI is investigating the incident, and security measures are being reviewed for upcoming events. An independent review will assess the security at the rally. I will address the nation further tonight from the Oval Office. God bless and protect our troops. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. Last night, I spoke with Donald Trump. I'm sincerely grateful that he's doing well and recovering, and we had a short but good conversation. Joe and I are keeping him and his family in our prayers. We also extend our deepest condolences to the family of the victim who was killed.
He was a father. He was protecting his family from the bullets that were being fired. And he lost his life. God love him. We're also playing for the full recovery of those who were injured.
And we're grateful to the Secret Service agents and other law enforcement agencies who and individuals who risk their lives literally for our nation. As I said last night, there is no place in America for this kind of violence or any violence for that matter. An assassination attempt is contrary to everything we stand for as a as a nation. Everything. It's not who we are as a nation.
It's not America. And we cannot allow this to happen. Unity is the most elusive goal of all, but nothing is important than that right now, unity. We'll debate and we'll disagree. It's not that's not gonna change.
But it's gonna we're gonna not lose sight, in fact, who we are as Americans. Look, vice president Harris and I were just briefed in the situation room by my Homeland Security team, including the director of the FBI, the secretary of Homeland Security, the attorney general, the director of the Secret Service, my Homeland Security adviser, the National Security Adviser. And we're gonna continue to be brief. The FBI is leading this investigation, which is still in its early stages. We don't yet have any information about the motive of the shooter.
We know who he is. I urge everyone, everyone, please, don't make assumptions about his motives or his affiliations. Let the FBI do their job and their partner agencies do their job. I'm instructed that this investigation be thorough and swift, and the investigators will have every resource they need to get this done. Look, as this investigation continues, here's what we're going to do.
1st, mister Trump is a former president and nominee of the Republican Party, already receives a heightened level of security. And I've been consistent in my direction of the Secret Service to provide him with every resource, capability, and protective measure necessary to ensure his continued safety. 2nd, I've directed the head of the Secret Service to review all security measures for the all security measures for the Republican National Convention, which is scheduled to start tomorrow. And 3rd, I've directed an independent review of the national security at yesterday's rally to assess exactly what happened. And we'll share the results of that independent review with the American people as well.
And finally, I'll be speaking more about this tonight at a greater length from the Oval Office. We must unite as one nation. We must unite as one nation to demonstrate who we are. And so may God bless you all and may God protect our troops. Thank you very much.
Mister president, when you spoke to president Trump yesterday, what did you
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
What do you notice about this photo of the president Trump would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks? https://t.co/IVW53UT1se
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Should the FBI be allowed to investigate Trump assassination attempt? FBI started 1908 their first job for Woodrow Wilson to spy, arrest Americans who disagreed with WW1. CIA started 1947 by Allen Dulles, a cousin to the (Federal Reserve) Rockefellers https://t.co/BuiE1Iy2Us
Video Transcript AI Summary
Throughout history, the FBI has been used to spy on American citizens who disagreed with government policies, especially regarding foreign affairs. Both Democrats and Republicans have utilized the FBI for this purpose, including monitoring churches and other groups. While some investigations may have been beneficial, the FBI's extensive record-keeping raises concerns. The CIA, established in 1947, has a poor track record as well, being used by administrations for questionable purposes. It is suggested that the FBI's functions could be handled by state justice departments instead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, most of our history, we didn't didn't have those institutions. The FBI came in, during the First World War. And interestingly enough, one thing that Woodrow Wilson did, he used the FBI to spy on American citizens and actually arrest them if they disagreed with his foreign policy about going to war in Europe. And isn't it interesting how recent they used it in the Vietnam era? Democrats used it there.
Republicans used the FBI to spy on a 100 different groups in this country, including the churches who disagree with the policy in Central America. It almost looks like the FBI was designed to spy on Americans who might be disagreeing, with policy, especially the foreign policy. So the FBI, although I don't think I can condemn everything they've ever done because I'm sure, some of the investigations and investigation of crime has been beneficial. But that could be accomplished through justice department within our states. We wouldn't reject that, portion of it.
I think the the FBI has, kept and continues to keep a lot of records on a lot of individuals. The CIA has only been here since 1947. Their record is lousy. I mean, just think of the CIA used by the Democratic, administration to
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
More video has surfaced showing people yelling at the police and Secret Service trying to get them to stop the assassination attempt of President Trump. We may need to come to terms with the fact that the rank-and-file police and agents were in on this too. https://t.co/C6Wn7k4paO
Video Transcript AI Summary
They're all pointing at someone on the roof, laying down. Millions of dangerous people and criminals should not be in our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. They're all pointing. Yeah. They they they Yeah. Yeah.
Someone's on top of the roof. Look. There he is right there. Yeah. Right there.
See him? He's laying down. See him? Yeah. He's laying down.
What's happening? Yeah. Look. Here he is. Because we have millions and millions of people in our country that should be here.
Dangerous people. Criminals.
reSee.it AI Summary
The CIA allegedly knew about mind control technology and manipulated a man to target Trump. The FBI's Pittsburgh Field Office, previously involved in investigating Hunter Biden, is now investigating themselves. A circulating post claims that "top brass" prevented the man in the photo from stopping the assassin. Following orders during an assassination attempt on Trump is deemed unacceptable. Do you agree?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
CIA has known mind control tech. They found suitable man and scrubbed his digital footprint. SS gave him time to setup on roof, ignoring warnings about a man with a gun aimed at Trump. They let him take clear shots then killed him once Trump fell. Now they investigate themselves. https://t.co/C609ghAQMn
Video Transcript AI Summary
After I left office, illegal immigration hit an all-time low, according to government data. However, when the current president took over, the number of illegal immigrants surged, with around 20 million entering the country. This chart, though a few months old, clearly shows the drastic increase in illegal immigration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's when I left office. That was the lowest point and that comes right from the government services, comes right out of border patrol. Take a look at that. So that arrow is the lowest amount of illegal immigration ever in recorded history into our country. And then and then the worst president in the history of our country took over.
And look what happened to our country, Probably 20,000,000 people. And you know that's a little bit old that chart that chart's a couple of months old and if you, wanna really see something they said, take a look at what happened.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Sound about right?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
JUST IN: The FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office is leading the investigation into themselves. This is the same office that originally led the investigation of Hunter Biden's “questionable” business dealings. Do you trust the FBI?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
This is also circulating. The poster claims here’s the man in the photo and that “top brass” prevented him from killing the assassin before he shot at Trump. If true it’s no excuse. Just following orders while Trump is assassinated is not acceptable. Agree? https://t.co/thmRxqHwbV
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Here's why you were taught that the United States is a democracy instead of a Republic. 👀 BIG difference.. https://t.co/DqJQrOC14D
Video Transcript AI Summary
A democracy lets people choose rulers who have power to make laws by majority vote, while a constitutional republic restricts rulers' law-making power through a constitution. The focus of a democracy is universal equality, while a constitutional republic values individual liberty. The Founding Fathers of America aimed to protect against democracy's potential dangers, favoring a republic. The Constitution mandates a republican government for all states, not a democracy. Benjamin Franklin warned of the risk of trading freedom for the false promises of democracy, which can lead to dictatorship and poverty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A democracy is a political system in which the people periodically by majority vote at the polls, select their rulers. The rulers then have absolute power to make whatever laws they please by majority vote among themselves. In a constitutional republic, the people also by majority vote at the polls select rulers who make laws by majority vote among themselves. But the rulers cannot make any laws they please because the constitution severely restricts their law making power. The ideal of a democracy is universal equality.
The ideal of a constitutional republic is individual liberty. In this century, great strides have been made toward the goal of subverting our republic and transforming it into a democracy. The foremost tactic of the subverters is subversion of language. By calling America a democracy until people thoughtlessly accept and use the term, totalitarians have obscured the real meaning of American principles of government. Writers of the constitution were anxious to safeguard liberty against dictatorship, monarchy, they called it.
But their chief anxiety was to protect the country against democracy. Edwin Randolph, delegate to the constitutional convention from Virginia, said the general object of the convention was to provide a cure for the follies and fury of democracy. Elbridge Gerry and Roger Sherman, delegates from Massachusetts and Connecticut, urged the constitutional convention to create a system to eliminate the evils that flow from the excess of democracy. Alexander Hamilton, delegate from New York said, we are now forming a republican government. Real liberty is not found in democracy.
If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy. John Adams, one of the giants of the American revolutionary period said, democracy will envy all, contend with all, endeavor to pull down all. And when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a short time, democracy will be revengeful, bloody, and cruel. America was founded not as a democracy, but as a constitutional republic. We pledge allegiance to the republic for which our flag stands not to a democracy.
The constitution requires a republican form of government for all states but does not mention democracy and neither does the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights. Woman asked him what kind of government the convention had given America. And Franklin replied, a republic if you can keep it. Very old and very wise, Franklin saw through the mists of time to the day when Americans might trade their freedom in a constitutional republic for the promise of government guaranteed equality and security in a democracy. And beyond that, to the day when democracy inevitably degenerates into dictatorship, guaranteeing nothing but poverty and serfdom for the people that robs and rules.
reSee.it AI Summary
The US dollar has long been the world's reserve currency, granting the US significant power. However, challenges such as debt, alternative currencies, and geopolitical tensions are eroding its supremacy. The rise of digital currencies and the internationalization of the Chinese yuan suggest a changing landscape. While the dollar remains strong, its hegemony is no longer assured. Change is inevitable, and the era of the almighty dollar may be entering a new chapter.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Title: The Rise and Fall of the US Dollar: A Historical Perspective Throughout modern history, the US dollar has reigned supreme as the world's reserve currency, wielding immense power and influence. Its ascent to global dominance traces back to the end of World War II, with the Bretton Woods Agreement establishing it as the anchor of the international monetary system. For decades, the dollar's supremacy facilitated global trade, investment, and economic stability, underpinning the growth of the United States and shaping the world order. Its status as the preferred currency for transactions and reserves gave the US unparalleled economic leverage and geopolitical influence. However, as the adage goes, nothing lasts forever. The dollar's unchallenged reign is facing unprecedented challenges in the 21st century. Factors such as mounting debt, fiscal deficits, and the emergence of alternative currencies and economic blocs are eroding its supremacy. The rise of digital currencies, like Bitcoin, and the internationalization of the Chinese yuan signal a shifting landscape where the dollar's dominance may no longer be assured. Moreover, geopolitical tensions and the weaponization of the dollar in sanctions have prompted countries to seek alternatives and diversify their reserves. While the dollar remains formidable, its hegemony is no longer unquestionable. The history of currencies is replete with examples of rise and fall, and the US dollar is not immune to this cyclical pattern. It's been a remarkable run, but as we look to the future, it's prudent to recognize that change is inevitable, and the era of the almighty dollar may be entering a new chapter.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
I have got to get myself one of these! 👀 https://t.co/MqP2cYqncT
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Do you want to get rid of the central banking cartel? https://t.co/V01U5QpAsu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve is not a government agency, but a banking cartel disguised as one. Congress gave it enforcement power, making it seem like a government entity. In reality, it's a group of banks that self-regulate by setting industry rules. These rules, passed as the Federal Reserve Act, give the appearance of government authority. If not followed, individuals can face imprisonment. In essence, the Federal Reserve is simply a banking cartel.
Translation: The Federal Reserve is a banking cartel that appears to be a government agency but is actually a group of banks regulating themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you asked the question in your book that, Creature from Jekyll Island. What is the Federal Reserve, and what is your answer?
Speaker 1: Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It it's not a government agency. It has the appearance of it being a government agency and they went to great lengths to give it that that facade. It does have the power of government because congress voted to give the power of of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel.
It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel or sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. They got together. They drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry is what cartels do, and then they send it to congress, and they took off the the label at the top that said banking cartel may erase that, and they said Federal Reserve Act. Congress passed it into law and that's why we think it's a government agency is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison.
And so it looks like a government agency. But basically, the answer to your question is it's a banking cartel.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
22,000,000 new likely Democrat voters who are strategically resettled to turn voting districts blue and add congressional seats, mail-in ballots with unclear mechanism of authentication, magic electronic voting machines. Do you really think that we can vote our way out of this? https://t.co/VWSPGJy7uK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yale study suggests over 22 million illegal aliens in the US. Democrats push for their legalization, potentially adding 22 million new voters who tend to vote Democrat. This could secure a permanent electoral majority for Democrats. Immigration debate is about power, not improving the country or meeting labor needs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The numbers you need to understand. Yale University released a study last week by 3 researchers, all the liberal, I believe, who concluded that the actual number of illegal aliens in this country is not 11,000,000. It's north of 22,000,000. 22,000,000. Mhmm.
Fact 1. Fact 2. The Democratic party is now, as a matter of policy, calling for the legalization of all illegals in this country. Citizenship voting rights, 22,000,000 new voters. Fact 3, the overwhelming majority of first time immigrant voters vote democrat.
Fact 4, the largest margin in American presidential history was 17,000,000 votes, 1980 election rather, 1984 election between Mondale and Reagan. And Reagan. Yeah. 17,000,000. You would add to our voter rolls 22,000,000, at least, permanent electoral majority in perpetuity.
That's what this is about. It's not about making the country better, serving our labor needs, helping the population. It's about putting Democrats in power forever. That is the truth of our immigration debate. Period.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
This document is circulating of a request from Obama to Boris Johnson and the UK about gathering information on President Trump and The Trump Organization. Susan Rice is identified in the document as spying on the Trump during his transition period. Is this legit? https://t.co/ILxljqonlk
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Why are they so power hungry that they want to cancel us? https://t.co/IghLmBdbbD
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to thank you for being here and for running for president. We have a great show tonight with Donald Trump as our guest. Everyone loves him. Thank you, Donald, for being here. Thank you for speaking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, I wanna thank you not only for being here. I wanna thank you for running for president. Also, we got a great show for you tonight. Donald Trump is here. Yeah.
Everybody loves him. There's no other way to say it. Ladies and gentlemen, Donald Trump. You got The money. Thank you so much for being here.
Thank you. Speaking
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Reports of bodies in the streets and houses like there were in Hawaii. Do you think they are using the Direct Energy Weapon (DEW) in Chile? https://t.co/r0iBB103s4
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Does this pass as the Biden admin and federal governments’ immigration plan? https://t.co/N1Jhn8DUXg
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
The government isn’t printing your money. Private families are printing your US Dollars. Wonder why we can’t change anything in Congress? Because they don’t work for us. We have an illusion of a democracy. An illusion of choice. We are basically owned by the central bank. https://t.co/Q8qc8CGsUL
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in a monetary revolution where the power needs to be taken back from the private families and central banks that print money. The government is not in control. This is why we can't see change in congress or have a government that works for us. We need a peaceful revolution, a monetary revolution, where we stop using their money and instead invest in assets like gold, silver, Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Global Boost. These assets can't be inflated or seized. Remember your seed phrase and keep it secure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen, guys. We are in a monetary revolution. We have been in a monetary revolution for over a decade. I thought I coined the phrase, but apparently with my good friend, Nick Spanos, I said it a few times on stage, and everybody said, oh, Nick Spanos. And so maybe I heard it from him.
But we need to take the power back from these people. And it's important that everybody understands that the Federal Reserve and the central banks, people that print the money is not the government. The government's not printing the money. Private people, private families a are printing the money. We're and and that's the problem, guys.
You wonder why you can't change anything in congress? You wonder why they don't work for you? You wonder why whatever you vote, however you vote, nothing happens? Well, the reason is, is because they don't work for you. We have a charade of a government.
We have an illusion of a government. We have an illusion of choice. And in fact, we work, we're owned basically by the central banks, the people that print the money. And it it's it's a crazy situation. And the monetary revolution is a peaceful revolution.
Been I've been preaching it for years on stages around the world, the monetary revolution. That's how we take the money. That's how we take the power back from these people. We get out from using their money. And I understand we gotta pay the mortgage, you gotta pay this, you gotta pay that, so fine.
Then do that and then put the rest of the money in gold, in silver, in Bitcoin, in Global Boost, in Litecoin, in assets that aren't that that aren't gonna go anywhere, that that they can't inflate. They can't inflate us. And, you know, the thing about Bitcoin, Litecoin and Global Boost as well is you can set up your coin. You can remember your seed phrase. 8 8 words.
Right? Put it to a song so you remember it. Don't forget it. Okay? But there's no hardware.
There's no code on your computer. There's no files. There's no nothing. There's nothing to seize. There's nothing to take.
So you could you could be thrown
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Stunning data out of New Zealand. They kept it secret until after the election. But the ruling party was ousted anyway. Should we create tribunals? https://t.co/heZpEuXSFI
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Liz Gunn discusses a whistleblower's claim that there are tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines in New Zealand. She calls for a full criminal investigation and the immediate halt of vaccine administration. Gunn shares examples of clusters of deaths occurring after people received the vaccine. She also mentions evidence that the government knew about the side effects before the vaccination campaign began. Gunn urges the public to demand an end to the vaccinations and warns of potential forced mass jab compliance under the Pandemic Preparedness Act. She differentiates between an inquiry and a criminal investigation, expressing her willingness to share the whistleblower's information with Winston Peters. Gunn hopes that the truth will be exposed and that the people of New Zealand will unite in demanding transparency from the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Liz Gunn, and welcome to this New Zealand loyal election update, the first of 2 election updates. In my previous video, just before the election went ahead, I stated that I would, post. There were many demanding that the information be released before the election, but that was not able to be facilitated. The whistleblower's words to us were that it would be published after the election. I also had deep concerns around the trauma the information would cause on the eve of the election.
And to me, it felt well, we have now come to an undisclosed location with a New Zealand clinician mathematician who is very experienced in statistical analysis. That person has with us reviewed the data and confirms our position that it is damning. The figures show that there are post. Tens of thousands of deaths linked to the jabs. And this is just one of the sites recording this type of information in New Zealand.
We don't know how many further databases like this are in the country. So it follows that as the deaths are usually less than the numbers of side effects, then the extrapolation of the numbers of injured and dead Kiwis post. We saw in the data that there are many clusters of deaths, people who attended the same jab site and were jabbed 1 after the other at consecutive times on the same day. We saw their jab date, and we saw their date of death. Let me give you just one of many examples.
On one day, 30 people were jabbed on the same day at the same location. All are now deceased. And their deaths are in close temporal time proximity to each other. That's That's 30. That's all players in a rugby match on the field suddenly dead.
You see, statistically, the numbers of deaths we saw it would be what they say statistically highly unlikely. We are calling for an inquiry. Not just any inquiry, a full blown criminal investigation leaving no stone unturned. New Zealand is a crime scene. Computers of anyone associated with this COVID response rollout in any capacity, mobile phones, communications, bank accounts, archives, and a whole host of other targeted information must be seized.
We have OIA evidence, official information act evidence, that the government knew every side effect before 1 single jab was given in New Zealand. So this evidence lays waste to the safe and effective narrative. Post. It also underlines the gravity and enormity of what I have just stated in this statement. The OIA evidence we have is attached underneath this post on the nzloyal.org.nz site.
But there's one thing for sure. There should be no more jabs administered in this country. So many lives have been lost. We saw 13 children on the list that we have examined alone. Since this whistleblower approached me saying they wanted me to release this once I was in parliament, I have wanted to have this data released immediately.
Why? Because, clearly, once it fully goes out to you, the public, it would prevent any more loss of life. In fact, so committed am I to stopping any further murder by needle in this country that I was willing to put my face I have seen the information first hand. I have struggled sleeping at night since then, knowing that this level of detail is now available, but as we find today being withheld. You see, whistleblowers always face great risk, as we all do, who seek to bring the truth to the people of this country under urgency.
I cannot comprehend why when there is ongoing harm that this data is not released immediately to bring an end to that harm and to launch a full blown criminal investigation. So I'm appealing to you, the people of New Zealand. You must all demand an end to the jabs. If not addressed urgently, the World Health Organization will be able to declare the next pandemic and force mass jab compliance under the Pandemic Preparedness Act, which will soon be a reality. Research that.
It's also critical that you understand the difference between an inquiry per se, which is what Winston Peters has called for, and what we call for, a criminal investigation. Inquiries often lead to narrow terms of reference, post. And they can risk just being a whitewash where they seem to be doing something, but there's little or no change as a result. By contrast, criminal investigations involve seizure and an in-depth examination and exposure of all facts. What I will do, New Zealand, should this whistleblower finally find the drive that we are showing at New Zealand Loyal, the determination that we have.
And approach me again and say they will divulge it all. What I will do is take that information to Winston Peters. I'm not looking for anything from this other than what I always look for, which is to serve my country. I will willingly offer it to Winston Peters should they find the courage to fully open up with what we have seen today. And I will hope that Winston gets along with the hard work of exposing it.
I would hope that he gets all the glory as well. What I want more than anything is for these truths to be brought to you, the people of New Zealand. And my final word today would be this, I pray that at last, the backbiting can stop, the nastiness, the undermining of one another can stop, and that this issue, this important, crucial standing together finally unites us all, New Zealand, and that we stand up to this new government and say, we demand a full exposure of the truth.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
“..you do not even have to have elections anymore, because we know what the result will be." - Klaus Schwab https://t.co/07o8zu6mNm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Technology, particularly digital technology, has evolved from having analytical power to now having predictive power. Some companies, like yours, are already involved in utilizing this predictive power. The next step could be moving towards a prescriptive mode, where elections may no longer be necessary because we can accurately predict the outcome beforehand. This raises the question of whether elections are still needed if we already know the result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So technology now is and digital technologies mainly have an analytical power. Now we go into a predictive power, and we have seen the first examples and your company very much involved into it. But since the next step could be to go into a prescriptive mode, which means, you you do not even have have elections anymore because you can already, predict what, predict. And afterwards, you can say, why do we need elections? Because we know what the result will be.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
People are saying this guy, James Yoo is/was the owner of the house. What do you think about that? https://t.co/fxPkj03v9p
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
What if I told you that the organization used to lock you down, wear a mask and forced mail-in ballots to overthrow the government in 2020 was run by people almost entirely with Israeli passports? https://x.com/networksmanager/status/1714054767788343595 https://t.co/fsOY4U1u80
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the discussion about COVID, the speaker listed several individuals and their dual citizenship with Israel, emphasizing their Jewish background. The speaker mentioned various positions within the CDC, such as the director, deputy director, chief of staff, and chief medical officer, as well as other roles in the healthcare industry. The speaker also mentioned individuals from Pfizer, BlackRock, and Johnson & Johnson. The transcript ends with someone requesting the speaker to stop.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When COVID was being enacted. I'm gonna read off the staff of who's in charge of this in, CDC. The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anne Shououtche, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
CDC chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC chief medical officer, Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, CDC director of the Washington office. I'm gonna This is this is pertinent to the topic. We're talking about COVID. With Wright.
Well, this Yeah. This is this is pertinent to COVID, so I love you, Jennifer. Yeah. I love Steve. Yeah.
Out, please. So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Rezek, dual citizenship with Israel, Duke, COVID czar, Jeff Zainz, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, COVID senior adviser, Andy Slavitt, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, assistant of health secretary for human services for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender gender neutral citizenship with Israel s June. Can I ask that you pulled off, Christopher?
Ma'am, I'm almost done. Mister fired with The the chair has ruled that your comments are out of order. She's asked you to stop. Oh, is it out of order? The Care has He said 2.
There's nothing wrong with 2. It's not the wrong Exactly. Okay. Good. Keep on going.
Head of Pfizer vaccines, Albert Bourke, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Pfizer chief scientist Michael a dosed in dual citizenship, but it's real too. But Dermot chief scientist, Paul Zacks, dual citizenship, Nashville too. BlackRock's doing the BlackRock. BlackRock CEO, Larry re facing dual citizenship with his return.
I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation You have nice and our lives. Yes, ma'am. And I love moved, and I appreciate your patience. BlackRock president Ra Raab Kapital dual citizenship with Israel Jew. The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson and Johnson joined Walt Schreicher dual citizenship with Israel.
Bill Christopher, you need to stop.
reSee.it AI Summary
Computer programmer wrote code to flip votes on electronic voting machines, raising concerns for safe elections in 2024. Peaceful protests in Washington, DC urged for change. Thoughts on the events of January 6th expressed. Speculation about intelligence agents fueling love for Israel. Surprising claims made about the organization behind lockdowns and mail-in ballots in 2020. Pennsylvania's role in the election mentioned.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Computer programmer who wrote the code to flip votes on magic electronic voting machines👇🏻 No way we can have a safe election in 2024 on the magic machines Strongly believe that we must come to Washington, DC to peacefully make change #MAGA https://t.co/U0lfHfDtOp https://t.co/W6dG0eVOpF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1, Clinton Eugene Curtis, testifies that he wrote a prototype program in 2000 that could secretly fix elections. The program could flip votes to any desired candidate without detection by election officials. Curtis explains that the only way to detect such a program would be to view the source code or compare paper receipts to the actual vote totals. When asked if he could have designed a protective program to prevent election rigging in Ohio, Curtis says no, as it would require examining the source code and involving programmers from all parties. Curtis believes that the Ohio presidential election was hacked based on statistical anomalies between exit polling data and tabulated results. He also reveals that he was asked to design the program by Tom Feeney, who was a lobbyist for Yang Enterprises.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Curtis would you please state your full name for the record?
Speaker 1: Name is Clinton Eugene Curtis
Speaker 0: And where do you reside?
Speaker 1: Tallahassee, Florida.
Speaker 0: And what is your profession?
Speaker 1: I'm a computer programmer.
Speaker 0: Would you please speak into the microphone so the audience can hear your testimony? I'm a computer programmer. Mister Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that to be the case?
Speaker 1: Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for president's congressman Tom Feeney At the company I work for in Oviedo, Florida that did just that.
Speaker 0: And when you say did did just that, it would rig an election? It would flip
Speaker 1: the vote 5149 Whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win.
Speaker 0: And would that program that you designed be something that elections officials that might be on County boards of elections could detect. They never see it. Mister, Would you answer that question once again?
Speaker 1: They would never see it.
Speaker 0: So how would such a program, a secret program that Graham, that, fixes the election. How could it be detected?
Speaker 1: You would have to view it either in the source code or you'd have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual boat total. Other than that, you won't see it.
Speaker 0: Alright. Mister Curtis, if you had been asked You or others with your professional expertise have been asked to design a protective program To that would protect the Ohio elections from against against such software to fix the election, could you have done so?
Speaker 1: If we've been asked to make a program that could fix the election, sure. Anybody can do it.
Speaker 0: No. Could could you have designed a program or to a procedure or a protocol that would have protected Ohio against this kind of rigging.
Speaker 1: No. You have to look at the source code. You have to get probably programmers from both or all parties to look at the source code and determine if there's anything in there that shouldn't be that I mean, it's a simple program. You're adding one To a person's total, it's a 100 lines of code tops.
Speaker 0: Alright. Yes, Rusty. Are you aware of whether there was any protective action in Ohio against this kind of vote ringing through software?
Speaker 1: I don't know. You don't know? I don't know.
Speaker 0: You were you were not asked to assist in the development of any protective system. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: No. I was not.
Speaker 0: In Europe, have you reviewed at all the election results in Ohio?
Speaker 1: No, I haven't.
Speaker 0: Given the availability of such The boat rigging software and the testimony that has been given under oath of substantial statistical anomalies, it grows These differences between exit polling data and the actual tabulated results, do you have an opinion whether or not Ohio Election the Ohio election, presidential election was hacked.
Speaker 1: Yes. I would say it was. I mean, if you're if you have exit pulling data that is significantly We have to go to the
Speaker 0: next level of And the testimony you've given is true.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Question back to
Speaker 2: the podium? Who did you say you were asked to prepare?
Speaker 1: I was asked by Tom Feeney. He's now congressman at that time. He was, speaker of the house of Florida, Yang Enterprises, which is the company I work for, lobbyists and their corporate attorney. We wore a lot of hats.
Speaker 2: And at the time, he was the speaker of the House of Florida. Is that what you said?
Speaker 1: Yes. Okay.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Yeah. Congressman. You're saying he was the the lobbyist for the voting machine company at the same time as the speaker of the house?
Speaker 1: I don't know what the building machine company is. He was a lobbyist for Yang Enterprises. We had NASA contracts and And
Speaker 2: Yang Enterprises did what? Computers? Computers. Okay. And he was your lobbyist?
Speaker 1: The lobbyist of that company, yes.
Speaker 2: And he asked you to design a to seek to design a counterargument ratio? Yes. While he was speaker of the party house?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 2: This is during or previous to the 2,000 election?
Speaker 1: Yes. October, end of September.
Speaker 2: And did he ever express why he wanted to go to reading the election?
Speaker 1: No. I immediately assumed that They were trying to keep you guys from cheating. So so I wrote up the documentation of what you would look for in the source code, how you would make sure that you didn't get, you know, taken advantage of, make sure that all voting machines had receipts because that way you could back count the ones that looked a little funny. And I handed it over
Speaker 2: Are receipts you mean a paper trail?
Speaker 1: Yes. Paper trail. And I handed that in to missus Yang and said,
Speaker 2: here's your report. Here's your program.
Speaker 1: And she said, you don't understand. We need to hide the fraud in the source In the source code. I destroyed, not revealed. Not revealed the fraud because it needed to con to control the boat in South Florida, was what she said.
Speaker 2: That's what she said. To your knowledge to your knowledge, was this used? I have
Speaker 1: no idea. I I was ready to leave,
Speaker 2: Your testimony a moment ago, I think you said just before you left and answered the Congressman and Tony Jones' question, Would you just repeat what you said in terms of the the exit polls?
Speaker 1: The exit polls should not be significantly different than the vote.
Speaker 2: And if they were, you would conclude what?
Speaker 1: I would conclude someone's playing with the vote.
Speaker 2: Now with the exit polls?
Speaker 1: That's possible too.
Speaker 2: Okay. Today's why Something is definitely skewed. Something is skewed in one or
Speaker 0: the other. Right.
Speaker 1: Just select which one you'd have to see where the problem is.
Speaker 2: One further question. Assuming for the moment that such software, That's what you thought it's such software to to rig a vote was used in 1 or more machines in Ohio or in Florida. Could you today detect that if you look at the source code?
Speaker 1: If you could get the machines and they have not been patched yet I mean, once they get in and touch them, anything can happen. You can also set timers through that, but then you see the timers. Then you'd have to take those machines, Decompile them, which I couldn't do, but possibly a Microsoft, an MIT, something to do. You might you might be able to see it. You might not.
This is depends on how good they are at destroying what they had.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
My thoughts on #J6. Recorded on Jan 7, 2021 https://t.co/ZsFod02cwB
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
At least 1/2 of the nut jobs going on about their love for Israel are likely just intelligence and military social media agents. 👇 Makes a lot more sense. Didn't think Trump voters were stupid enough to follow Crooked Joe Biden into WW3... https://x.com/NetworksManager/status/1719372288317882752?s=20
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
What if I told you that the organization used to lock you down, wear a mask and forced mail-in ballots to overthrow the government in 2020 was run by people almost entirely with Israeli passports? https://t.co/11GgpvISJe
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Irish senator gets her 15 minutes of fame after going full fascists. How do you feel about that? https://t.co/xR9756pJbM
Video Transcript AI Summary
All legislation restricts freedom for the common good. Our constitution balances rights with the common good. If your views on others' identities make their lives unsafe and cause deep discomfort, it is our duty as legislators to restrict those freedoms for the common good.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you think about it, all law, all legislation is about the restriction of freedom. That's exactly what we're doing here is we are restricting freedom, but we're doing it for the common good. You will see throughout our constitution, yes, you have rights, but they are restricted for the common good. Everything needs to be balanced, and if your views on other people's identities go to make their lives unsafe, insecure and cause them such deep discomfort that they cannot live in peace. Then I believe that it is our job as legislators to restrict those freedoms for the common good.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
January 6th, 2021 was a setup to push through certification of the irregular results of the 2020 election! FREE THE #J6 PATRIOTS NOW! https://t.co/FLbyvecuZS
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Jesus told us that Satan is the God of this world—the prince and ruler of the earth. It makes sense when we witness the prevalent killing and evil deeds. Many unknowingly worship him. While we have free will, the eventual cost may be disagreeable. https://t.co/PyKniUd1Za
Video Transcript AI Summary
The devil is a real person, not just a vague term for evil. Jesus took Satan seriously and gave him titles like "prince of this world" and "God of this world." Many people unknowingly worship Satan by seeking worldly desires. God allows Satan to have power in this world because he gives his creatures freedom to rebel. The devil hates the books of Genesis and Revelation because they expose his devices and describe his doom. Jesus taught us to pray daily for deliverance from the evil one. Evil is personal, just like love. So, while we start our prayers by thinking of our heavenly father, we must also acknowledge the presence of the devil on Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell you a bit about the devil first, so that you've got a clear picture in your mind of what we're praying against. 1st of all, the Bible does not paint him as a horned creature with a folktale. That's the sort of thing that makes us laugh at him. Take him less than seriously. See the bible says he's a real person.
The bible never calls the devil it, always be. Next, the bible says that he has a heart and a mind and a will. And if a heart and a mind and a will don't make a personality, I don't know what does. Talks about the Devil's feelings, talks about his thoughts and it talks about his motives. And that means to me a person.
So the devil is not just, a a kind of vague word to sum up all the forces of evil in the world. No. He is a person in his own right and if there were no beings at all, Satan would still exist. Now Jesus himself took Satan desperately seriously. He never made a joke about He never laughed at him.
He never caricatured him. Here are some of the titles that Jesus gave Satan. He said, he is the prince of this world. When Satan offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the world, Jesus did not say they are not yours to give because he knew perfectly well they were Satan's to give. And it is a a horrible thought if you really realize it that the world in which we live is ruled over by Satan.
He is the prince of this world, but let's take it a step further. Do you know that another title Jesus gave to Satan? He said he's not only the ruler or prince of this world, he is the God of this world. The only other person beside his heavenly father to whom Jesus ever replied the word God was Satan. He said, my heavenly father is God of everything, but of this world, Satan is God, which means very simply, not only that Satan controls this world and is able to manipulate science and education Politics for his own ends.
More than that, Satan is actually the real God whom most people on Earth worship. Whether they know it or not. That behind so much religion, behind so much activity, Satan is the one who's being worshipped. He's the person and even by some who go to church and chapel on Sunday. In reality, He's their God.
For they worship the things that He offers them. They want the things of the world that he belongs to and rules over rather than setting their mind on the things that are above where Jesus is. And if you want this world and if you want the things of this world, then I give you a piece of advice. Make Satan your god. If you want this world, he's a wonderful god to have because he'll give it there's always a price to pay.
When the bill comes in, you may not be quite so happy, but he'll give it to you. He can give you money. He can give you fame. He can give you anything you want because it's his to give. Where have you been Satan says God in the book of Job while I've been patrolling the Earth, I've been looking around my estate.
And he had. Now let's get this clear. That doesn't mean that God is helpless in this world, it does mean and we've got to think this through that God is allowing Satan to be prince of this world and God of this world, he's allowed it. And people say, what does god think he's doing allowing that? Well, I would just say my only answer to that is what's he doing allowing you to be like you are?
Why should you blame him for allowing Satan to rebel when he allowed you to? The answer is very simple. He's a father and he will not force any of his creatures to go his way and he gives you freedom to rebel. We can't grumble about him giving the angels freedom though they have superior intelligence and strength because he gave us the same freedom and we've used it in the wrong way. Do you know there are 2 books in the Bible that the devil hates more than any other 2 books in the bible out of all 66, there are 2 that say more about him than any others and it's these that he has attacked more than any others, they are the 1 at the beginning, the 1 at the end.
Genesis and Revelation. And you know why he hates them? Because Genesis describes is devices and revelation describes his doom. And he hates those 2 books and there has been more scholarly attack on the book of Genesis than any other book and more attempt to turn it into myth and legend and away from fact than any other book in the bible. Why?
Because Satan doesn't want you to believe that Genesis 3 ever happened. He doesn't want you to know how he got hold of Eve. He doesn't want you to believe that he said what he did to that 1st married couple. And he attacks the book of Genesis, but the other book which he hates more than any other is the book of Revelation. Because as you read through that book, you come to a point where it says that the devil himself will be cast into the lake of fire.
Do you know that Jesus told us to pray every day about the devil? You know that? The original Prayer that he taught his disciples when they said, Lord, teach us to pray. He said, pray like this. Say, dad in heaven, Then pray for the things he wants, his name, his will, his kingdom.
Then he said, pray for the things you need. You need food. You need forgiveness. Then he said, finish by praying this. Deliver us from the evil one.
We've turned evil into a thing in our thinking. It's not a thing. It's a person. There's no evil anywhere in the Universe apart from persons. Evil is an intensely personal thing.
There's no love in the Universe apart from sentence was love. And so evil is personal. And Jesus said, pray daily. Deliver us from the evil one. Start your prayer by thinking of your dad in heaven, but end your prayer by thinking of the devil on Earth and go out to face
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Have you heard of Project Looking Glass? How about the Yellow Cube? https://t.co/8ZRKl4LXiB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the level of secrecy surrounding secret facilities and the capabilities of classified projects. They mention the Looking Glass technology, which allegedly allows for backward and forward time travel using an operator's consciousness. The operator sits in a chair recovered from an extraterrestrial craft and uses toroidal fields of energy to collect and project data onto video monitors. The biases of the operator can affect the images collected. The speaker also mentions the YellowCube, which provides possible future outcomes based on the choices one would make. Leaders of governments allegedly used this technology for personal gain. The Looking Glass device was supposedly given to humans in ancient Sumerian times and was used until a cataclysm in 2012. The device has since been dismantled, and we are likely in a positive timeline. The authenticity of this information is questioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The level of secrecy and secret facilities and the capabilities of our nationally kept secrets, would shatter most people's imagination of what is possible.
Speaker 1: This is probably one of the more well known black budget time travel projects, With the exception of the Montauk project, many whistleblowers have said that the program was not actually shut down, but just classified
Speaker 0: Into deep black. The people that know everything about Looking Glass, that have gotten all the reports and all the information, the elites of the world, probably figured out that that was the end of the game. I mean, nothing could be manipulated beyond that point.
Speaker 1: According to the alleged insiders, the looking glass technology was apparently used to look backward and forward in Using the consciousness of an operator is a type of steering mechanism. The operator would sit in a chair that was apparently recovered from a downed extraterrestrial craft capable of interfacing with consciousness directly. When the device was turned on, strong toroidal fields of energy cycled about a pouch of water at the center, Which acted as a sort of resonator for in streaming energies from the point of focus maintained by the operator. The data was collected And projected onto video monitors at incredible speeds, which later needed to be deinterlaced to reveal discernible images. What's interesting is that the biases of the operator would have a direct effect on the images collected.
For example, If one were to look back to the time of Jesus' crucifixion, if the person doing so is an atheist, they may not see anything at all. But if the person was a Christian, They may see the infamous crucifixion event. This is suggestive of a time space mechanic in the universe, wherein the human mind is able to navigate through time itself. The work of Dewey b Larson and his reciprocal systems theory provides the basis for this interpretation. Briefly, as described by Larson, The universe is broken up into 2 physical regions as defined by motion.
Below the speed of light, motion operates in 3 dimensions of space earth. In one dimension of time, above the speed of light, motion operates in 1 dimension of space and 3 dimensions of time. As bizarre as that sounds, The mind is uniquely equipped to navigate in time, which is able to access memories of the past, gain awareness of events in the present, conceive of future possibilities, And even imagine alternative events that did not actually happen. In other words, the human mind can select the point of focus just like in remote viewing And receive the information from the store of memories made during the experience.
Speaker 2: Do you know the difference between Looking Glass And the YellowCube? Yes. Okay. Are you aware of what happened to the YellowCube and how it was used and so on?
Speaker 0: Are I, I believe that the YellowCube still exists. I can't say for certain if it's on this planet, but I would say that it's definitely protected from use at this point.
Speaker 2: Okay. Well, that coincides with the testimony we got.
Speaker 0: The old cube or the old book would give you your possible future. Yes. So it took basically the choices that you would inherently make along a timeline, and tell you what that timeline would be given that you made all the choices that your brain would make?
Speaker 2: Well, this is exactly what I was just gonna What we were told is that leaders of governments and so on, people in high places, you know, politically, Would, would use this to try to see their most optimum future and then follow those, those, so they were using it to enhance their wealth, etcetera, etcetera, in a very egotistical way, and that was part of the problem with it.
Speaker 1: The Looking Glass device seems to be capable of the same type of process. To access a data stream from any conceivable location In space or time, steered via the consciousness of an operator. According to the testimony of Burish, the technology was provided to the human race during the Sumerian Times when an advanced contingent of future humans went back in time and provided that civilization assistance after a cataclysm known as the Deluge. The Sumerian cylinder seals were encoded with plans to build the Looking Glass device. Earlier versions of the project saw the development of an actual portal that an individual could move through to jump in time.
According to Burisch, accounts provided by captured beings known in the program as p forty fives, Future humans 45000 years into the future, the Earth was destroyed by massive cataclysms around the year 2012. This is apparently because looking glass devices were actively being used during a major celestial alignment, which overloaded the organic energy grid of the planet. Urush further claims that the device has been dismantled as a result of discovering 2 probable timelines. One of which is the Cataclysm described by the captured being. An attempt was made to look into the future, but no concrete data was able to be received past the infamous date Of December 21, 2012.
Suggesting that this date is a nexus point in time, whereby either timeline 1 Or timeline 2 would gain momentum. In the last report, the bureau suggested that timeline 1, the positive timeline, had an over 80% likelihood of coming to fruition. Given that we are nearly a decade beyond the 2012 date and no major cataclysms have occurred, We are most likely well entrenched within the positive timeline. This is undoubtedly one of the more intriguing topics in awakening times, Which seems to be well hidden in popular works of fiction. Corey Goode, a secret space program insider, claims to have reviewed documentation relating to this project.
Speaker 0: It would be very hard to accept that all of this information that is currently held secret and classified is actually real.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Absentee ballots dated 11-0-2020.. Sequential ballots, same signatures, no dates at all #Michigan. They buried all this, jailed the opposition, made you too scared to protest. And now we're using same exact magic electronic voting machines and mail in ballots. RISE UP AMERICA! https://t.co/AzbGX6giCG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker noticed irregularities with the absentee ballots. The ballot numbers were in sequence, which is unusual for mailed-in ballots. The speaker also discovered that the envelopes lacked a date and the ballots were all from the same area. The signatures were similar, and there were no date stamps. Additionally, the ballots were not showing up in the system and had to be entered manually. When the speaker questioned these issues, they were met with resistance from the supervisor. Despite wanting to stay in the room, the speaker chose not to challenge further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Started, writing down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person on the ballot, the that had the name on the ballot. They were all in sequence. These are absentee ballots, mailing mailing ballots. They cannot be in sequence. 2232 cannot have two two three three next to it because if they're mailed in, they come in all different numbers.
And when when I started noticing that these numbers are almost next to each other, like 1 or the other was in the middle, but then they were almost next to each other. My my antennas went up. That's exactly when I thought something is not right here. Then I asked the supervisor. There was not even a date on those, envelopes.
It said November 0 dash 2020. There was no second number there. Then I said, what is the date on this one? Then they got really mad at me. They said, you're not letting us do our job.
You're disturbing And at that point because we really don't wanna be kicked out, you know, so we were just kinda not challenging anything because we wanna still stay in the room because we barely had anybody. Not only that, the sequence ballot numbers were all from the same area, like the guarded street in the downtown Detroit. Guarded street, Sequential ballots, signatures were all alike. They had no date stamp. It said, like, it was empty after 0.
There was no 3rd or second or first or nothing. And, they were none of them were coming up in the system. They were all being entered manually. They even knew that none of these details would even be in the poll book or in the system.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
We will not be free until the #J6 patriots are released and compensated. I was on the back side of the Capitol when this happened. I saw this very moment with my own eyes. https://t.co/KHkd4dbvXU
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
There is no way in a fair election, with only U.S. citizens voting that the Democrats can beat President Trump. That's why they are trying so hard to cheat! Agree? Yes or No https://t.co/zfzWOGIf3F
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Was our government overthrown in the 2020 election?
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein is a famous example of this. He allegedly worked for the Mossad and conducted honey pot missions on many of our leaders. https://t.co/v83WzcEU7b
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the person in question may not be an American operator and could be linked to Israeli intelligence. They mention that running such an operation could lead to significant consequences for any country involved. The speaker also highlights that the individual was given a substantial amount of money. When asked about similar examples, the speaker mentions the Mossad, who have previously engaged in similar activities, such as organizing orgies to obtain compromising information. However, one such operation was discovered and had to be terminated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kind of cut to where I was going, which was I don't think he was an American operator.
Speaker 1: The allegations were that this guy was a cutout or an operative or a construct or whatever you wanna call it of the Israeli Assad. Look. Whatever country this is, there would be a lot of blowback for them having run this operation, and that's that could be why there are so many things.
Speaker 0: Think about what they were doing. They took a Then constructed a brand new person out of him. Essentially gave him not unlimited money, but gave him a lot of money.
Speaker 1: Is there other examples out there Or foreign intelligence agents who's doing similar Yeah.
Speaker 0: The Mossad. The Mossad does have examples of where they have done this before. They had At a gentleman in the Middle East, he began to hold orgies to get the Compromat. But fortunately, he was found out, and they had to get rid of
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Hearing that the Ron Desantis team and his Super Pac had prostitutes working on the event staff. That's standard operating procedure for Washington, DC. That's how they do the #HoneyPot. https://t.co/6Lnh2hxn9Y
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
The Bush administration resisted having any kind of investigation on the September 11, 2001, attack for 441 days. How do you feel about that? (37 post thread)
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Thoughts on #ETeam the World Trade Center Artists A large group of artists were given space and construction access to the World Trade Center in the four years leading up to 9/11 https://www.markdotzler.com/Mark_Dotzler/WTC_Artists.html https://t.co/iM9NyqsSn1
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
"I will not give one penny to any school that has vaccine mandate or a mask mandate." -The Donald aka President Trump! https://t.co/4QEtShRfoV
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger asserts that CIA and FBI have controlled the site for 15 years, using it to manipulate the public. He asserts Wikipedia has become a tool of control for the U.S. government, pointing to evidence of CIA and FBI computers editing the site since 2008. https://t.co/GCKFh8k5un
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Trump walked into Madison Square Gardens with Kid Rock, Tucker Carlson, and "American Bad Ass" playing—looking like the Right Wing Avengers. And the crowd went nuts! 🔥🔥🔥 -Joe Rogan https://t.co/5Bc26imABn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes the moment when someone walked out of Madison Square Garden to a cheering crowd. The atmosphere was electric, with the crowd going wild as Kid Rock's "American Badass" played and Tucker Carlson joined in. The cheers were overwhelming and lasted for over a minute, with the crowd showing strong support. It was an intense experience, with people screaming at the top of their lungs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When he walked out of Madison Square Garden, it was fucking bananas. Really? It was the whole place was cheering. He walks out to Kid Rock's American Badass with Kid Rock and Tucker Carlson walking in like the right wing avengers, and the place went nuts. I'm telling you, The fucking cheers of the crowd were nuts.
I mean, it was overwhelmingly in support and it lasted a long time. I mean, it was a I mean, you had to hear what the crowd sounded like before we walked in, and then we did. I mean, it was just overwhelming cheers Yes. For, like, over a minute. I mean, just imagine a minute of people screaming at the top of their lungs.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
The released footage on January 6th, suggests possible treason. On-record evidence reveals that Nancy Pelosi communicated multiple times with the Chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, despite her public statements suggesting otherwise. #J6 #MAGA https://t.co/1MCuiIWxxu https://t.co/A6xvrHQLw1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Pelosi called for the resignation of the Capitol Police chief and received notice of the resignation of Mr. Irving. Speaker Pelosi claimed she hadn't spoken to the speaker since the initial breach, but the speaker clarified that he had spoken to her three times. The first call was to brief Vice President Pence, the second call was when he left the location and spoke to Speaker Pelosi about getting back into chambers, and the third call was to brief all the leadership on the plans. Speaker Pelosi's comments about not speaking to the speaker were inaccurate. The speaker also praised the bravery of the Capitol Police.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second set here, in a press conference on January 7th, Speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television.
Speaker 1: I am calling for the resignation of the capitol the chief of the capitol police, mister Sund, and I have received notice from mister Irving that he is will be submitting his resignation.
Speaker 0: Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the capital, But according to your transcribed interview, you're on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times.
Speaker 1: Well, let me just say this, many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely and so with such concern for the staff, for the members, for the capital For the capital of the United States. Many of them and and they deserve, our gratitude. But there was a failure A leadership at the top of the Capitol Police, and I think mister Sund, he hasn't even called us since this happened. You know, so I had made aware that I would be saying that we're calling for his resignation.
Speaker 0: Can you explain that discrepancy? Yeah, that
Speaker 2: is, that is correct. I spoke to Speaker Pelosi, three times, that evening and, she went on national TV And said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her 3 times. The 3, 3 times were the first time when I went over to brief, President, Vice President Pence That's a secure location. I had called, House Sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the Vice President. I was also going over to do a personal assessment of capital.
At that point, things were getting under control, went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, Mr. Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone, he made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 5:34, where I first briefed Speaker Pelosi. The 2nd call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me his cell phone and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line.
This is my call second call with Speaker Pelosi, questioning the information I'd given to, vice president Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7, 7 PM, and the call ended. That was call number 2. Call number 3 was 6:25 PM.
I was over at the senate, from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, They dialed leadership who was over off-site at a secure location and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would've been call number 3 with speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 0: So you didn't have 1 call, you didn't have 2 call, you had 3 calls, so Speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate? That is correct, sir.
Speaker 1: Let me just say this. Many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Free the #J6 political prisoners NOW! Agree? Yes or NO https://t.co/65EyvFuw9F
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Mitch McConnell received donations from magic electronic voting machine lobbyist before blocking election security bill in 2019. Should Mitch be the next Mc to go? Yes or No https://t.co/IvxESUmSmr
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
As you're told do not to come to Washington, DC to lobby to change the magic electronic voting machines and mail-in ballots that removed your favorite president @realDonaldTrump, the Speaker of the House speaks at a rally for Israel. Would he do the same for you #MAGA? https://t.co/CooiRkc3kp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leaders from both parties in Washington are united in their support for Israel. The United States stands firmly with Israel as its neighbor, friend, and ally. Calls for a ceasefire are deemed outrageous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There there are few issues in Washington that could so easily bring together leaders of both parties in both chambers, but the survival of the state of Israel and her people unites us together, and it unites all Americans all Americans. Let me be very clear. The United States stands unequivocally with our neighbor, our friend, our ally, Israel. They are they are neighbors in a global sense. That's right.
The calls for a ceasefire are outrageous. Party. Party. We stand with you in
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Trump / Jenna Ellis 8 GOP voted no->impeach Mayorkas US to give $10bil to Iran Qatar office in Gaza bombed Israel asserts migration plan sending Palestinians to the West, says no entity except them stays in Gaza 11,000 dead Lebanon / Beirut next Look at the Greater Israel project https://t.co/vHWyBXKcms
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses various topics. They mention a video by Jenna Ellis, who claims that Dan Scavino said Trump would not leave the White House. The speaker speculates on how this will impact voters and legal proceedings. They also mention 8 Republicans voting against impeaching Mallorca's, the DHS official. The speaker criticizes Congress and accuses them of being part of a cabal. They mention the release of $10 billion to Iran and the bombing of the Qatar office by Israel, which has caused Arab nations to turn against Israel. The speaker also mentions Israel's migration plan and their belief in a Greater Israel project. The video ends with the speaker expressing love and blessings to the viewers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, my friends. So real quick, I just want to run through the Tuesday morning roundup because we got a lot going on. First of all, we all saw last night Jenna Ellis come out with a video. She's saying that, Dan Scavino told her that, they weren't going to leave. Trump was not going to leave the White House no matter what.
I'm sure that's going to be corroborated by the other people that plead out. And we're going to see how that affects everything. 1, how it affects the psyche of the voters. And 2, how it affects legal proceedings. I don't think a lot of us blame Dan Scunino for saying that.
I mean, it wasn't an off the tough comment, I mean, whatever, right? But it was a stolen election. So but that's how that that's the plan, what they're doing over there, so it remains to see how that's going to play out. We had 8 Republicans vote against impeaching Mallorca's, The guy, the DHS guy who's been letting all the illegals in. So of course, you have the the our congress is just a joke.
You have MAGA Mike there. And they'll continue to do some votes for this and that and the other, but nothing is going to change, obviously. That's why he got a 100% of the Republican votes. She's working for the cabal. We are, looks like we're gonna release 10,000,000,000 more, dollars to Iran.
So we're gonna give them the money that they need to, fight, as we do. The Qatar office this morning got bombed by the Israelis. And that has now coalesced a lot of the Arab nations, more Arab nations that were standing by Israel, to being against them, like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and these types, Qatar, obviously. So that was either smart or not smart, depending on what you think the Israelis are going to do. They have also put out a migration plan.
They're saying now there can be no entity in Israel other than Israel, in Palestine or Gaza other than Israel. And of course, if you look at the Greater Israel project, you'll see, some of the lands that they also plan to retake. And if you look at their, what they believe is their promised land, it includes a lot of different territories, A lot of different countries surrounding the area, including Lebanon, and you see them bombing Lebanon right now. So there's probably even more than that. But I love you guys.
God bless.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
You must be publicly warned. That's the deal. This scene was never shown again, and the series was cancelled. https://t.co/I1qqNOh1xk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a conspiracy theory about the Federal Reserve and the World Economic Forum. They claim that every time a baby is born, the Federal Reserve issues a birth certificate, which is used as currency to back the government's debt with the World Economic Forum. They also suggest that the Council on Foreign Relations orchestrated the 9/11 attacks to invade Iraq and install fast food chains. The speaker further alleges that world leaders have been replaced and a nuclear holocaust was created to make global warming real. They mention mind control through satellite waves, contrails, and vaccines, as well as fluoridation of water to keep people's gold fillings intact. The speaker concludes by mentioning the Federal Reserve as the puppet master, controlled by the world monarch and the all-seeing eye.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Done. I win. Cheryl, it's not a race. That's what losers say. What is that?
The truth. Every time a new baby is born, the Federal Reserve issues a single birth certificate printed by a company called the American Bank. That way, the government can use people as Currency to back the debt they have with the World Economic Forum, which owns the central banks of every nation on earth. But the WEF is just a front for the Council on Foreign relations, which masterminded the 911 attacks as a pretext to invade Iraq, take the oil, and install fast food chains to make people slow, fat, and easily abductible by the shape shifting reptilian aliens It worked with. Now, back in the thirties, FDR made a deal with these reptilians to exchange people for technology.
That was the basis of the New Deal. But ever since, they've been slowly replacing all the world leaders Create a nuclear holocaust to make global warming real for their takeover. That's how they made up the Cold War by sending Laika to space to bite Neil Armstrong while Cooper was faking the moon landing. Now they're using satellite waves, contrails, and measles vaccines as mind control and fluorodating the water to keep people's gold fillings intact so they can be sent back to, you guessed it, the Federal Reserve, Where all the gold and birth certificates are stored by the real puppet master, the world monarch, who is himself only the servant of the all seeing eye who controls Everything in the world. I was wrong.
You do
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
In the new world, you have to accept total transparency. It will become integrated into your personality. But if you have nothing to hide you shouldn't be afraid. -Klaus Schwab He means the Cabal will have privacy, just not you. We must stop them. Agree? https://t.co/uOhkrPvNM9
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this new world, we must embrace complete transparency. Everything will be transparent, and we need to adapt and behave accordingly. It becomes ingrained in our personalities, even if we have nothing to hide. There is no need to be afraid.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dans ce nouveau monde, il doit accepter une transparence et je dirais même une transparence totale. Tout va être transparent. Et il faut s'habituer, il faut se comporter ainsi. Ça devient comment dirais-je intégrée dans votre personnalité même si on n'a rien à cacher, il ne faut pas avoir peur.
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
Our country has it backwards. We are private citizens. The government should know nothing about us. Congress and the President are public servants. We should know everything about them. Agree? Yes or No https://t.co/Y0xlbD4jdh
