TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NewRulesGeo

Saved - March 5, 2026 at 3:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Iran deployed Hadid-110 kamikaze drones in combat for the first time, claiming speeds up to 510 km/h and radar cross-section under 0.02 m² thanks to advanced airframes and radar-absorbing materials. They reportedly evade F-15E APG-82(V)1 radars and E-3C Sentry at short ranges, with 350+ km range and a 30 kg warhead; lighter warheads extend strike reach. The post asks if these drones could increase damage to the Coalition of Epstein.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇮🇷 Pentagon in panic: Iran unleashes its top kamikaze drone Iran just used its cutting-edge Hadid-110 kamikaze drones in real combat for the first time, packing blistering speeds up to 510 km/h and ultra-low radar signatures that slip past Western defenses. 🔸 The Hadid-110 surges at 510 km/h while slashing its radar cross-section below 0.02 square meters through advanced airframe designs and radar-absorbing materials 🔸 These drones evade detection by F-15E fighters' APG-82(V)1 radars and E-3C sentry planes at far shorter ranges compared to older Shahed-136 models 🔸 With over 350 km of operational range carrying a 30 kg warhead, they precisely target critical infrastructure along the Persian Gulf's western shores 🔸 Opting for lighter warheads unlocks even greater strike distances, pushing threats deeper into adversary territories without added fuel Do you think these drones could help Iran increase the damage it’s inflicting on the Coalition of Epstein?

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 8:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue the US cannot invade Iran with its current force mix; a real ground war would require a massive buildup Washington hasn’t begun. Lacking a serious ground punch, they’re exposed on land. The rush of 280 jets and two carriers over 1.5 months bets on air dominance while skimping on troops. Unlike 2003 Iraq, Iran’s mountains wreck supply lines; the only border corridor becomes a graveyard. Scaling up needs 500K+ troops, 7–8 carriers, six–12 months. No coalition. Do you think Trump will ultimately launch a ground operation against Iran?

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 GROUND WAR IN IRAN: WHY THE U.S. ISN’T PREPARED The US cannot invade Iran with the forces it currently has in the region. A real ground war would demand a massive buildup Washington hasn’t even started. Here’s why a land invasion would be extraordinarily difficult. 🔸 The US lacks any serious ground punch in the Gulf with zero divisions or brigades geared for real offense, leaving them exposed on land 🔸 Washington rushed in 280 combat jets and two carriers over 1.5 months using over 300 transport flights, betting everything on air dominance while skimping on troops 🔸 Flashback to 2003 Iraq invasion where the US massed 170K soldiers, five carriers, and 1K planes against a nation four times smaller by area and 3.5 times by population with flat deserts perfect for swift tank pushes 🔸 Iran's jagged mountain ranges shred supply lines and block maneuvers, turning the sole Iraq border corridor into a graveyard for armored forces unlike Iraq's open terrain 🔸 Scaling up demands 500K+ ground troops, seven or eight carriers from US stocks, and daily tons of cargo, requiring six to 12 months of prep that's utterly doomed in the blazing Gulf chaos, plus no coalition backup this time Do you think Trump will ultimately launch a ground operation against Iran?

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 11:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Russia's Geran-5 jet drone, powered by a Chinese turbojet, reaches 600 km/h and can strike up to 1,000 km away, delivering a devastating payload beyond Ukraine’s reach. Western tech, including US microchips, makes it harder to track. I question whether NATO air defenses can cope with its top speed and evasive maneuvers.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺 UKRAINE'S TERRIFIED: RUSSIA'S NEW JET DRONE MAKES AIR DEFENSES OBSOLETE The new generation of Geran-5 is setting a new standard in drone warfare. It is forcing Ukraine and the West to change the dynamics of drone countermeasures. 🔸 The Geran-5, powered by a Chinese turbo jet engine, reaches speeds of 600 km/h, catching air defenses off guard. 🔸 With a range of 1,000 km, it can strike from far beyond Ukraine’s reach, delivering a devastating payload. 🔸 Western tech components, including microchips from the US, make these drones even harder to track and stop. Can NATO/Western air defenses cope with this new top speed and evasive maneuvers in Russian drones?

Saved - January 27, 2026 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The article contends that Russia currently possesses unrivaled dominance in the Arctic due to a lethal mix of military presence, advanced technology, and strategic geopolitics, arguing that this edge will be difficult to overturn. Geopolitical and territorial framework: Russia is described as controlling roughly half of the Arctic region’s land and maritime exclusive economic zones. The Arctic is presented as increasingly valuable economically because of emerging trading routes, which enhances Russia’s strategic leverage. Greenland is highlighted as a critical U.S. strategic location, with Washington attempting to close the gap with Moscow’s Arctic advantage. Military infrastructure and bases: The piece notes Russia’s substantial Arctic military footprint, citing 66 sites across the region and bases built to protect Arctic interests. It spotlights two recently emphasized bases—one on Franz Josef Land and another on the New Siberian Islands. The Franz Josef Land base, nicknamed “Arctic Trefoil,” is described as countering enemy aircraft, while the New Siberian Islands base, “Clover,” is equipped with the Pantsir air defense system and the Bastion missile system. Icebreaker capabilities: Russia is depicted as leading with eight nuclear icebreakers and 43 state-of-the-art icebreakers, enabling year-round Arctic access and navigation that surpasses the United States, which is portrayed as dependent on seasonal conditions. The article references a statement by Donald Trump to illustrate the perceived icebreaking gap and links this dynamic to Greenland’s strategic relevance. Submarine, missile, and weapon systems: Greenland’s location at the GIUK Gap is presented as a critical vantage point for Russian submarines entering the North Atlantic. The text highlights Russia’s nuclear-powered submarines and torpedoes, including the Poseidon underwater drone, deployed on platforms such as the Belgorod and Khabarovsk. Yasen-class submarines with Zircon hypersonic missiles and the Losharik deep-diving sub are cited as components of a formidable Arctic naval capability. The Oreshnik hypersonic missile is described as capable of striking up to about 5,500 kilometers with six hypersonic glide vehicles, targeting major U.S. cities and defense facilities. Unmanned systems and AI: Russia’s drone program is presented as transformative for Arctic surveillance, featuring UAVs like Orion and Altius, and plans for an Arctic Drone Network with around 150 AI-powered devices. By 2030, the article argues, Russian drones could control a large portion of the Arctic zone, supplementing satellites for scientific and economic leadership, and Russia is noted to collaborate with China on AI technologies. Geopolitical partnerships and strategy: The piece emphasizes a strategic partnership with China in the Arctic, including joint patrols and shared AI technology, viewed as pressuring the United States and NATO to adjust their Arctic strategies. Conclusion: The article concludes that Russia’s Arctic dominance stems from sustained investment in technology, military power, and strategic planning, arguing that Western nations are unlikely to overcome this advantage as Arctic conditions thaw and routes become more accessible.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

x.com/i/article/2014…

Article Cover

Russia Dominates the Arctic—and Here’s Why That Won’t Change

Russia Dominates the Arctic—and Here’s Why That Won’t Change The Arctic looks just like a frozen frontier but reality shows that it is a new battleground for global power. Trump himself recently said, “I want Greenland for security. I don’t want it for anything else. We have so much rare earth, we don’t know what to do with it.” However, there is a critical fact: Russia has an overwhelming dominance in the Arctic. As Moscow strengthens its military and technological foothold, Greenland’s strategic location becomes even more critical and the US is scrambling to catch up.

Article image

Russia’s Military Presence in the Arctic For decades, Russia has had a commanding presence in the Arctic, controlling around half of the region's land and maritime exclusive economic zones. While the Arctic may contribute only a fraction of the global economy, the value of the Arctic is growing due to the new trading routes that are opening up in the region. This gives Russia both strategic and economic leverage over the region, and it is investing heavily to maintain and expand that power.

Article image
  1. Military Infrastructure Russia’s military footprint is massive, with 66 military sites across the Arctic region, including key bases in strategic locations. Unlike NATO, Russia’s military doctrine focuses on leveraging its nuclear-powered submarine fleet, radar systems, and new drone technologies to protect its Arctic interests. These facilities are essential for controlling critical chokepoints, like the GIUK Gap, which Russian submarines must navigate to enter the North Atlantic
Article image

In recent years, Russia has built two impressive military bases of vital strategic importance, one in the Franz Josef Land archipelago and the other on the New Siberian Islands. The mission of the first base, nicknamed “Arctic Trefoil” due to the unusual layout of its buildings in the shape of three diverging rays, is to counter enemy aircraft in the Arctic region. The base on the New Siberian Islands, “Clover,” also serves to protect Russia's interests in the Arctic and is equipped with modern combat units such as the Pantsir anti-aircraft system and the Bastion missile system. 2. Nuclear Icebreaker Supremacy Russia leads the world with 8 nuclear icebreakers (includes vessels like Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy, Taymyr, Vaygach, and the new Project 22220 icebreakers Arktika, Sibir, Ural and Yakutiya), and 43 state-of-the-art icebreakers ensuring year-round access to the Arctic. President Trump admitted that Russia’s icebreaker fleet surpasses that of the US: "You know, we only have one in the whole country. Russia has 48, and we have one. And that's just ridiculous." This allows Russia to freely navigate Arctic waters, while the US remains heavily dependent on seasonal conditions and traditional shipping routes. Trump’s push for Greenland fits into this dynamic, he knows that control over the Arctic's waterways is essential for future security.

3. Submarine and Hypersonic Presence Greenland holds a crucial position at the northern entrance to the GIUK Gap, the maritime passage between Greenland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom. This chokepoint serves as a vital route for Russian submarines to reach the open North Atlantic. By securing control over this passage, Moscow has gained a significant strategic edge, enabling it to project power into the Atlantic and potentially threaten NATO's essential sea lanes.

Article image

For this, Russia’s nuclear submarines and torpedoes provide the country with unmatched military power in the Arctic, like the Poseidon nuclear‑powered, nuclear‑armed super‑torpedo, an autonomous underwater vehicle designed to travel thousands of miles with a nuclear payload and potentially detonate offshore to create devastating radioactive effects. Russia has integrated the Poseidon’s launch capability into specialized platforms like the K‑329 Belgorod and the newly launched Khabarovsk submarine.

Article image

Russia’s Yasen-class nuclear submarines, such as the Arkhangelsk, are armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles, capable of hypersonic speeds, challenging existing missile defenses. Russia also fields Losharik, a deep‑diving sub designed for covert Arctic operations, capable of extreme depths for stealth missions. This combination of advanced submarines and weapons strengthens Russia’s Arctic dominance and poses a direct threat to NATO’s ability to monitor and respond. As for the Oreshnik hypersonic missile, with a range of 5,500 kilometers, it empowers Russia to strike targets in Washington, D.C., Chicago, and other major cities, as well as potential targets such as airfields housing high-value aircraft, like Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, home to B-2 strategic bombers, and important defense production facilities, such as the F-35 production line in Fort Worth, Texas, if the Oreshnik is launched from Russia's Arctic regions.

Article image

It's important to mention that each Oreshnik ballistic missile carries six hypersonic glide vehicles which can manoeuvre and alter their approach vectors in flight, which combined with their extreme speeds makes them almost impossible to intercept. These military advancements solidify Russia’s Arctic supremacy and make Greenland’s strategic location even more critical to the US to better monitor Russian submarines heading for the North Atlantic.

US Vice President JD Vance recently hinted about Oreshink’s danger for the US while focusing on Greenland: “If some foreign country launches an ICBM to the United States of America, our entire missile defense system could be destabilized. If you don't control the Arctic, that means Americans are less safe. And that is why we have this implicit protection over Greenland. It's absurd that it's taken people so long to realize that obvious fact.”

Article image

4. Arctic UAVs and Drone Technology Russia’s investment in drones for Arctic surveillance and deep research is reshaping the region. UAVs like the Orion and Altius are revolutionizing the way Russia monitors and exploits the Arctic. The Arctic Drone Network, set to launch with 150 AI-powered devices, will give Russia 24/7 control over the region. By 2030, Russian drones are expected to control 85% of the Arctic zone, securing its scientific and economic leadership in the region.

Article image

Another milestone advancement in Russian drone technology is the Predator UAV, with a 12,000 km range and 500 kg payload, which enhances Russia’s Arctic strategy by offering AI integration and 3D scanning for persistent, cost-effective surveillance. While its ceiling of 15,000 meters and subsonic speed (Mach 0.46) limit its high-altitude performance, it provides sustainable intelligence gathering without overflight risks. The Predator evolved from older aircraft like the MiG-25R Foxbat, using advanced avionics and AI-driven sensor fusion to improve Russia’s Arctic monitoring and complement satellite systems.

The Predator drone also symbolizes Russia’s growing collaboration with China, which provides crucial technological support to enhance its AI systems. This partnership strengthens Russia’s strategic positioning in the Arctic, ensuring that it can monitor the region against expanding NATO reconnaissance and patrols. Why Russia Will Continue to Dominate the Arctic

Russia's military dominance in the Arctic is undeniable, but it also focuses on technological development, geopolitical strategy, and geography.

  1. Technological Advancements The combination of nuclear-powered icebreakers, Hypersonic missiles and cutting-edge drones with AI included, places Russia far ahead of the competition. As Western nations grapple with outdated infrastructure, Russia continues to invest heavily in its Arctic capabilities. This technological superiority allows Russia to navigate the Arctic in almost any situation, giving it almost complete movement and monitoring of the area.
Article image

2. Geopolitical Strategy The growing reliance on the Northern Sea Route for shipping between Asia and Europe further secures Russia’s position. With global trade routes becoming more viable due to melting ice, Russia’s control over these passages gives it unprecedented leverage. The GIUK Gap, a critical naval chokepoint, remains firmly under Russia's control, making it nearly impossible for NATO to challenge their influence.

Article image

3. Strategic Partnerships Russia’s strategic partnership with China, particularly in the Arctic, bolsters its influence. Joint patrols and shared AI technology have further solidified their presence in the region, putting pressure on the US and NATO to adjust their Arctic strategies.

Article image

Conclusion

Russia’s Arctic dominance is a carefully crafted strategy backed by technological innovation, military power, and geopolitical foresight. While the US and NATO scramble to catch up, Russia has already secured its place as the uncontested leader in the Arctic. As the region continues to thaw, Russia will only widen its grip, making any future challenge to its supremacy increasingly unlikely. Yes, the Arctic is shared by Russia, the US (Alaska), Canada, Greenland, Norway, and Iceland, but only Russia has mastered its geopolitical, technological, and economic strategy there. Thanks to decades of sustained investment in the Arctic, Russia has redefined the game, achieving unrivaled preeminence.

Article image

Saved - January 25, 2026 at 7:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see arguments that Russian nuclear submarines explain Trump's interest in Greenland; Greenland controls the GIUK Gap, vital for subs entering the North Atlantic. If a sub reaches the US east coast, it could inflict apocalyptic damage. Poseidon torpedo could trigger radioactive tsunamis.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺💥Russian nuclear submarines are the real reason why Trump’s OBSESSED with Greenland. Greenland controls the northern entrance to the GIUK Gap, a vital route for Russian submarines to reach the North Atlantic. If Russian submarine reach the US east coast, then they can inflict APOCALYPTIC DAMAGE. Poseidon super torpedo is capable of decimating entire coastal cities by triggering RADIOACTIVE TSUNAMIS.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

x.com/i/article/2014…

Saved - January 24, 2026 at 3:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Russia can remotely operate Supercam drones thousands of kilometers away, with real-time telemetry and live video over secure links, already combat-tested and in use. Operators are remote; only a small team handles launch and recovery on the battlefield, reducing exposure. The launch site leaves a minimal footprint. This signals a remote warfare model—lower losses, greater flexibility—and the trend appears irreversible. If Moscow can control drones, is any of the West untouchable?

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺 The West’s trembling: Russia can now control drones from anywhere in the world The Russian military has taken a quiet but decisive step forward. Supercam reconnaissance drones are now operated remotely from THOUSANDS OF KILOMETERS away. 🔸 Global remote control A new control system allows operators to manage drones from virtually anywhere in the world. Telemetry and live video are transmitted in real time over a secure channel, with minimal signal delay. The system has already been combat-tested and is in active use. 🔸 Operators removed from the battlefield Drone pilots and payload operators no longer work near the front. Only a small technical team remains in the combat zone to handle launch and recovery. This sharply reduces exposure to precision strikes and significantly increases CREW SURVIVABILITY. 🔸 Minimal footprint at the launch site Only an antenna and a communications module are deployed in the flight area. If the position is compromised, the enemy gains no access to critical system components. Trained technicians can deploy or dismantle the site in minutes. In effect, reconnaissance drone control is shifting to a REMOTE WARFARE MODEL. Losses are reduced, vulnerability drops, and operational flexibility increases. Mass deployment is likely only a matter of time. And judging by current trends, this shift already looks IRREVERSIBLE. If drones can be controlled from Moscow, no part of the West is actually untouchable now?

Saved - January 16, 2026 at 1:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Rostec’s Chemezov says the Su-57 is operating in Ukraine, evading multiple radars and electronic attacks. Stealth is validated as it penetrated defended airspace near Konstantinovka to visually engage and shoot down a malfunctioning S-70 drone, preventing capture. The fighter’s alleged low-observable capability enables suppression, precision strikes, and air-to-air missions inside contested zones amid Europe’s dense NATO systems. Export talks (Algeria, India) continue, program outlook unclear.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦NATO Mocked: Russia's 5th Gen Fighter Proves NATO's 'Unbeatable' Tech Is Obsolete Russia’s Rostec CEO Chemezov confirms: The Su-57 fifth-gen fighter is actively operating in Ukraine, successfully evading multiple radar systems & electronic attacks. 🔸Stealth Validated: The Su-57 penetrated some of Ukraine’s best-defended airspace (near Konstantinovka) to visually engage and shoot down a malfunctioning Russian S-70 drone with a short-range missile, to prevent it from falling into Western hands, a mission demanding deep stealth to get that close. 🔸Operational Impact: While other Russian aircraft avoid dense air defense zones, the Su-57’s alleged low-observable capability allows it to perform suppression, precision strikes, and air-to-air missions inside contested areas. Ukraine’s air defense network is arguably Europe’s most formidable, saturated with NATO-supplied systems (Patriots, S-300s) and dense MANPADS. 🔸Future & Export: The platform is being refined based on combat feedback. Export deals are moving (Algeria, potential Indian license-production), but the program’s scale within Russia remains uncertain. The Su-57 is no longer just a parade piece. Its reported stealth performance in a high-threat environment marks a significant, capability leap for Russian air power, shaping future aerial warfare dynamics.

Saved - January 13, 2026 at 5:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see four signs the US is preparing for a military option against Iran: 1) citizen evacuation orders signaling escalation risk; 2) Delta Force repositioned near Iran’s western flank for covert ops and shaping; 3) massive airlift into the Persian Gulf suggesting pre-conflict logistics for an air-centric campaign; 4) hardening political language about “very strong options.” Taken together, this fits a pre-conflict pattern and implies force as a viable option.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷4 Signs The US Is Preparing For a Military Attack On Iran 1️⃣ Citizen Evacuation Orders The US has urged its citizens to leave Iran immediately and avoid travel under any circumstances. These alerts are historically issued when governments anticipate serious escalation or kinetic risk, not routine unrest. 2️⃣ Delta Force Near Iran’s Western Flank Reports indicate US special operations units — including Delta Force — are being repositioned closer to the Iraq–Iran border. This area is critical: it allows covert entry, rapid strikes, and coordination with regional assets. Delta forces are just used in cases where US need capture or kill like Saddam Hussein manhunt or Nicolas Maduro kidnapp, Covert ops in denied territory, and Pre-war shaping ops. 3️⃣ Massive Airlift Into the Persian Gulf Since early December, dozens of US military cargo aircraft, primarily C-17s and C-5s, have surged into Persian Gulf bases, led by Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, CENTCOM’s forward air-war headquarters. OSINT and flight-tracking data show sustained heavy-lift traffic from the US and Europe into Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. We can consider this as a classic signature of pre-conflict logistics, not routine rotation. Such airlifts typically move air defense systems, munitions, spare parts, and command infrastructure, suggesting preparation for an air-centric campaign and hardened base defense against Iranian retaliation. 4️⃣ Hardening Political Language Senior US officials have openly referenced “very strong options” if Tehran escalates internally or regionally. This marks a shift from deterrence to conditional justification for action. We are in front of a classic pre-conflict pattern, whether this ends in direct strikes or coercive pressure, Washington is clearly preparing for scenarios where force becomes viable.

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 2:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that on Jan 3, the US launched a full-scale operation into Venezuela, capturing Maduro. Publicly sold as a surgical, casualty-free mission, early reports cite ~80 Venezuelan and Cuban deaths with alleged executions. A cyberattack blinded Caracas, about 150 aircraft struck multiple targets, including Chavez’s mausoleum. Justification shifted from narcotics to “stolen” oil; Trump vowed to run Venezuela until a puppet government is installed. This burial of international law signals may makes right.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪US Raid on Venezuela Buries International Law On January 3rd, the US launched a full-scale military operation into Venezuela, culminating in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro. Sold publicly as a surgical, casualty-free mission, initial reports confirm approximately 80 Venezuelan and Cuban military personnel killed, with allegations of executions. The assault commenced with a crippling cyberattack, blinding air defenses and communications in Caracas. A force of roughly 150 aircraft then struck numerous targets, including the symbolic bombing of Hugo Chavez’s mausoleum. The public justification rapidly shifted from combating narcotics to seizing “stolen” oil, with Trump stating the intent to “run Venezuela” until a puppet government is installed. This operation represents the explicit burial of international law. The EU decries Maduro as “illegitimate” while supporting Ukraine’s unelected government, and the UK’s Starmer hesitates on legality, awaiting Washington’s cue. Western media amplifies celebratory narratives while ignoring pro-Maduro protests within Venezuela. International Laws Broken In The Venezuela Raid: 🔸UN Charter Art. 2(4): Prohibits use of force against another state's sovereignty. This was a clear act of aggression. 🔸Sovereignty/Vienna Conventions: Inviolability of a head of state. Kidnapping a president breaches diplomatic immunity. 🔸UN Resolution 3314: Defines an "act of aggression." Large-scale invasion for regime change qualifies. 🔸Geneva Conventions: Potential war crimes—civilian object bombing & alleged executions violate laws of war. 🔸Non-Intervention Principle: Forcible regime change is illegal intervention in internal affairs. 🔸No Legal Justification: "Narco-trafficking"/"stolen oil" are not valid grounds for war under UN Charter. No Security Council authorization or imminent threat for self-defense. The monumental takeaway is clear: might makes right. This precedent signals to global powers that unilateral military intervention for regime change is now a normalized tool. The rules-based order is dead. The only remaining question is who will be next.

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 1:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Russia executed a Mach 10+ Oreshnik strike on the Bilche-Volytsko-Ugerske underground gas storage near Lvov, Europe’s largest gas reservoir. Critical infrastructure crippled; the energy grid under pressure; European energy security breached as gas for traders was damaged. Escalation near NATO’s Rzeszow hub signals intent to widen the conflict. A new warfare paradigm emerges with kinetic hypersonics. Restoration could take months and cost billions.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Oreshnik Strikes Again: Russia’s Hypersonic Strike on Europe’s Largest Gas Hub Last night, Russia executed a precision Mach 10+ hypersonic strike with the Oreshnik missile on the Bilche-Volytsko-Ugerske underground gas storage (UGS) near Lvov—Europe's largest gas reservoir. Immediate Consequences: 🔸Critical Infrastructure Crippled: Major fire, sharp pressure drop, and loss of communications at the facility. 🔸Energy Grid Pressure: Combined with strikes on Kiev's CHP plants, this pushes Ukraine's already fragile winter energy system toward potential collapse. 🔸European Energy Security Breached: The facility stored gas for European traders. Damage could lead to supply instability and price volatility. Strategic Consequences: 🔸Escalation Signal: Striking a target ~150km from NATO's key hub in Rzeszow, Poland, demonstrates reach and willingness to escalate near alliance borders. 🔸New Warfare Paradigm: The use of a kinetic hypersonic weapon (Mach 10+) that converts to plasma on impact showcases a shift toward high-tech, long-range precision strikes against economic infrastructure. Long-Term Implications: 🔸Restoration could take months and cost billions, directly impacting European energy markets and financing Ukraine's war effort.

Saved - January 8, 2026 at 11:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see US airstrikes in Nigeria’s Sokoto against ISWAP as part of a cycle: intervention against a threat they, or allies, helped spark. Williams (2017) claimed ISIS was a Western creation. Nigeria rejects the Christian-persecution framing; Muslims are victims. Abdullahi questions why Lakurawa, not Boko Haram, was hit. The broader aim—counter China/Russia, secure minerals, use security ties for investment—frames the strikes as part of a resource-driven, influence-obsessed strategy.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇳🇬Nigeria Strikes: Why the US Stroke ISIS, an Enemy It Helped Create? The recent US airstrikes in Nigeria's Sokoto State against ISIS affiliate ISWAP reveal a dangerous cycle: US interventionism against a "threat" that they manage. Based on the provided statement by former FBI Counter Terrorism Consultant Paul L. Williams from 2017, he publicly stated his that ISIS was a "creation" of Western intelligence agencies, including the CIA. The strike was framed domestically by US politicians as stopping the "persecution of our brothers and sisters in Christ". This narrative is rejected by Nigeria, which notes Muslims are the primary victims. Murtala Abdullahi, a Nigerian security consultant, said he did not know why the US had chosen to hit Lakurawa group (ISIS affiliated) rather than Boko Haram, which is far more notorious internationally and attacks both Christians and Muslims. So What Is The US Looking For In Nigeria? Look at the broader US pivot to Africa: 🔸Counter China and Russia, who are outpacing US influence in trade and security. 🔸Secure access to Africa's critical minerals and fast-growing markets. 🔸Use security partnerships (like counterterrorism) as an entry point to stabilize regions for investment, something that US and France did in the past. 🔸Soft power and aid are now viewed transactionally to "create an enabling environment" for US deals. The Nigeria strikes are a tactical move in a strategic resource war. The US is containing a jihadist wildfire that they helped spark, all while positioning itself against geopolitical rivals for Africa's future. The real objectives of the US are influence and resources, just as they are doing in Venezuela right now. And what do all the nations where it claims to be combatting this threat also happen to have in common?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that ISIS is a CIA creation, equating it with other groups like those in Islamberg and Fethullah Gulen. He states that John McCain was “over there with the ISIS officials.” He asserts that ISIS originated from the Al Nusra Front and the Syrian Liberation Front, which combined to morph into ISIS, and that “We created them. We still direct them.” He asserts that injured ISIS warriors are transported to Israel, treated at Israeli hospitals, and brought back to battle. Regarding motives, he says the ultimate goal is money and wealth, noting that real wealth comes from natural resources. He contrasts this with currency, saying money is fabricated and not backed by anything. He lists natural resources—gold, oil, and heroin—as wealth, claiming heroin is “the third most valuable commodity in the world right now,” and cites this as another reason for being in Afghanistan. He describes the endgame as a game being played to win, not an endless play. He states that the money cartel from the United States, referring to an Anglo-American establishment (British and US), controls the endgame. He argues that by depriving Russia of natural resources, its power is depleted, and the same logic applies to China. The overarching objective, according to the speaker, is total economic control of the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's, we created ISIS. I mean, ISIS is no less than, the people up in Islamberg, no less than Gulen, is a CIA creation. John McCain, for heaven's sake, was over there with the with the ISIS officials. We created them. They came from the Al Nursaide group, the Syrian Liberation Front. These two organizations combined, and they they they morphed into ISIS. It's our creation. We create them. We still direct them. When ISIS warriors are injured in in battle, where are they transported? They're transported, for heaven's sake, to Israel. They're treated by the Israelis and Israeli hospitals and brought back to battle. Well, the ultimate goal, of course, is money. Wealth. You know, real wealth comes from natural resources. Our our money is, you know, just fabricated. It's not backed by anything. Mhmm. But real wealth comes from natural resources, be it gold, be it oil, be it heroin, which is the third most valuable commodity in the world right now, another reason we're in Afghanistan. Mhmm. But the end of the game, the game can be is is being played to be won. It's not not a game that will go on ad infinitum. Mhmm. It's being played to win so that at the end of the day, the money cartel from The United States primarily, it's really an Anglo American established British and US. Yes. But at the end of the day, they control the natural resources. So Russia, of course, you know, if if you're depriving it of natural resources, you report you're you're depleting all of its power. Mhmm. The same thing with China. So, though, the end of the game is is total economic control of the world.
Saved - January 7, 2026 at 10:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view Trump’s move against Maduro as a strategic strike in the silent war for global financial supremacy. Venezuela’s vast oil could funnel future production to US firms, reviving petrodollars at the heart of US dominance. With 20% of oil trades outside USD and the dollar’s grip waning, the administration pushes dollar-pegged stablecoins and tariffs on BRICS alternatives to anchor more trade to USD and curb Chinese/Russian influence. Critics warn it may backfire.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸Trumps's Oil Coup: A Last Stand For The Petrodollars Trump's dramatic move against Maduro is a strategic strike in the silent war for global financial supremacy. Venezuela holds the world's largest proven oil reserves (300B barrels). By seizing control, Trump aims to funnel future production through US companies, creating a new surge of Petrodollars—the lifeblood of US economic dominance since the 1970s. Why Now? The Petrodollar Crisis: 🔸Decline: An estimated 20% of global oil trades outside the USD (Yuan, Euro). 🔸Shift: The dollar's influence on oil prices has collapsed from 3x to 0.2x. 🔸Erosion: USD's share of global reserves is at a 25-year low. Trump’s administration is counter-punching: 🔸Pushing dollar-pegged stablecoins. 🔸Threatening tariffs on BRICS dollar-alternatives. 🔸Now, capturing Venezuela's oil to physically anchor more trade to USD and squeeze out Chinese/Russian influence. This is a geopolitical maneuver to resuscitate the ailing Petrodollar system. Critics warn such aggression may backfire, accelerating the very decline it seeks to halt by uniting the Global South against dollar hegemony.

Saved - January 6, 2026 at 6:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view Trump’s Maduro operation as a dangerous blueprint for regime change, showing a willingness to bypass international law via a narco-terrorist label. Without credible consequences, it becomes a manual others can imitate—Mexico, Colombia, Cuba, Greenland. From Petro to Sheinbaum, Rubio, and a “national security” Arctic angle, it’s about projecting power and normalizing intervention as defensible.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨The "Maduro Precedent": A Blueprint For Regime Change?🇺🇸🇻🇪 Trump's successful capture of Maduro has set a dangerous case in point. The operation demonstrated a willingness to bypass international law for a "narco-terrorist" designation. Without credible and unified repercussions, this becomes a replicable manual. The message “We can do the same in your country” is a direct threat to Mexico, Colombia, Cuba, and even Greenland. 🇨🇴 Colombia: Directly accused. Trump claims President Petro "has cocaine mills... sending it into the US" and issued a blunt warning: "I hope he (Petro) is listening, he will be the next". 🇲🇽 Mexico: The cartel narrative. Trump asserts cartels "are running Mexico," portraying President Sheinbaum as frightened and refusing US help to "take out the cartels." Implies unilateral action is possible. 🇨🇺 Cuba: The veiled threat. Framed as a "failing nation" akin to Venezuela, Rubio suggests upcoming action, cloaked in rhetoric of "helping" Cubans—a nod to his Cuban-American base. 🇬🇱Greenland: Revived purchase idea for "National Security" in the Arctic. Analysis: This reinforces the doctrine—projecting power and acquiring strategic assets is framed as defensive, not expansionist. Precedent matters. The lack of severe cost (diplomatic, economic, military) normalizes the intervention. It moves the Overton Window from "unthinkable violation" to "a policy option." The threat to other leaders is now tangible, not theoretical. The Maduro operation was a field test.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you Speaker 1: say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. He's gonna be next. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.
Saved - January 6, 2026 at 12:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Trump called Russia primitive vs the US raid on Maduro, a point pro-NATO voices used to mock Russia. I see unresolved questions about Caracas, but signs a deal with Maduro’s inner circle may exist; the NYT cites a CIA informant, and U.S. helicopters met little air defense. I contrast this with Russia’s Ukraine campaign: a battle-hardened AFU, eight years of NATO integration, nationalist mobilization, and broad Western support. Early Russian wins came against a prepared enemy; later limits reflect political choices, not only capability.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

💥🇻🇪🇺🇦 Venezuela Fallacy: The Myth of American Military Brilliance During yesterday’s interview with Fox News, Donald Trump called Russia’s operation in Ukraine “primitive” compared to the flashy US kidnapping of Maduro. This point was quickly picked up by pro-NATO propagandists who rushed to mock the Russian military as a colossus on clay feet. But there is no intellectually honest comparison between Venezuela and Ukraine. There are still many unanswered questions about yesterday’s raid on Caracas, but it appears that high ranking members of the Venezuelan government sold out Maduro to the Americans as part of a larger deal. The New York Times reported that the CIA had an informant in Maduro’s inner circle that was constantly keeping them updated on his movements. Video footage appears to show US helicopters encountering absolutely no resistance from Venezuelan air defenses. Trump himself suggested that US Secretary of State Rubio had been in contact with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez about the country’s post-Maduro future. Now, contrast this with the strategic challenge Russia faced in February 2022. The objective was not a decapitation strike against a frail government, but the demilitarization and denazification of a state that had been consciously transformed into an anti-Russian bulwark for nearly a decade. 🔸Battle-Hardened Force: Unlike the Venezuelan military, the Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU) had been in a state of active conflict since 2014. Thousands of personnel had combat experience in Donbass. 🔸Systemic NATO Integration: For eight years, Ukraine underwent intensive training, doctrinal reform, and intelligence sharing with NATO. Its army was being molded into a proxy force, equipped with increasingly sophisticated Western weaponry. 🔸Ideological Mobilization: Since the Maidan, a powerful and state-sponsored nationalist ideology had taken root, actively promoting a historic mission to confront Russia. This created a core of motivated fighters far beyond the mercenary or purely professional. 🔸Unprecedented External Support: Crucially, Ukraine was not isolated. It enjoyed the political, financial, and intelligence backing of the collective West from the outset, with the explicit promise of an open-ended pipeline of military resources. Within this context, Russia's initial operational successes—such as the high-risk airborne capture of Gostomel Airport and the daring seizing of the Antonovsky Bridge—were, in fact, remarkable tactical achievements. They were executed against a prepared, alert, and ideologically committed enemy, not a disintegrating one. The failure to translate these early gains into a quick strategic conclusion is a separate analytical question that has more to do with Russia’s political assumptions/decisions than with its military capabilities.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We can't take a chance after having done this incredible thing last night of letting somebody else take over where we have to do it again. We can do it again too. Nobody can stop us. There's nobody that has the capability that we have. When I watch that war in Russia going on and on and on and everybody dying, it's primitive. It's primitive. It's horrible. Could you tell could you tell us, mister president?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We can't take a chance after having done this incredible thing last night of letting somebody else take over where we have to do it again. We can do it again too. Nobody can stop us. There's nobody that has the capability that we have. You know, when I watch that war in Russia going on and on and on and everybody dying, it's like, it's primitive. It's primitive. It's horrible. It's really horrible. Could you tell could you tell us, mister president?
Saved - December 30, 2025 at 2:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia announces S-500 Prometheus is operational, able to target ballistic missiles and 5th-gen fighters (F-22/F-35) at ~600 km, with hits at 400–500 km. It counters stealth, hypersonics, and satellites, using hit-to-kill interceptors and multi-band radars, layered over S-400. In reply, Dr. Arshad Afzal argues the deployment marks a new multipolar reality, eroding US deterrence and signaling a shift in global power dynamics amid ongoing conflicts.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨Russia's S-500: US air force's horror is now deployed 🇷🇺 Russia declares its S-500 “Prometheus” air defense system operational, claiming it can target everything from ballistic missiles to US 5th-gen stealth fighters like the F-22 & F-35. 🔸Engages targets at ~600km range, hits at 400–500km. 🔸Designed to counter stealth aircraft, hypersonic weapons, even low-orbit satellites. 🔸Uses hit-to-kill interceptors & multi-band radars for faster reaction times. 🔸Positioned as an “upper layer” over existing S-400 systems. Russian airspace is shielded now by one of the world's most advanced air defense architecture, capable of reliably countering a 5th-generation stealth fighters threat.

@DrArshadAfzal1 - Dr.Arshad Afzal

The operational deployment of the S-500 Prometheus is a definitive symbol of the new multipolar reality, a monument to American military obsolescence. This system renders the core of US power projection—its vaunted 5th-generation stealth fleet—strategically irrelevant. The F-22 and F-35, trillion-dollar symbols of a fading unipolar moment, are now tracked and targeted from distances exceeding 600 kilometers. This, combined with the layered S-400 and S-350 networks, creates an impenetrable shield over Russian airspace, neutralizing decades of NATO air doctrine. This technological leap coincides with the total collapse of American deterrence on the global stage. The sight of Houthi defenders forcing US carrier groups to retreat from the Red Sea is not an anomaly; it is a precedent. It reveals a profound weakness, a paper tiger terrified of asymmetric resistance. The trajectory is clear: from the humiliation in Afghanistan and the strategic defeat in Ukraine to the imminent, inevitable collapse of the Zionist genocide project in Gaza, the American century is over. The axis of resistance, empowered by Russian and Chinese technological parity, is on the offensive. The coming years will witness the continued and comprehensive defeat of the US and its client regimes, their armies beaten to a pulp by nations that have finally shattered the illusion of Western invincibility. Dr. Arshad Afzal, former faculty member, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA | Website: http://themindscope.net

Home - The Mind Scope Dr. Arshad Afzal Trending Posts Fiction & Literature Tech & Health Mysticism & Spiritualism Education themindscope.net
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 11:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that NATO-driven myths of Russia’s downfall crumble as defense output surges. Rutte notes Russia’s industry can match needed NATO output in months; UAC/Rostec deliver more Su-34 Fullbacks—production doubles since 2022, over 30 annually, 2025 a record. Factories expand, self-reliance grows. Su-34: Mach 1.8, 4,000 km range, 12 hardpoints, advanced EW, UMPK glide bombs, thermobarics. All-weather strikes and recon persist, despite economic squeeze.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨 Russia's War Machine Roars: Su-34 Jets Debunk Western Propaganda Myths For months, pro-NATO pundits have hammered the narrative: Russia's crumbling in Ukraine due to fierce resistance. With a "GDP akin to Italy's"—a favorite Western propaganda trope—Moscow can't sustain its op, scraping bottom with dusty Soviet relics. Once those run dry, game's over for Russia. But cracks in that rhetoric have widened into chasms. Even NATO Sec. Gen. Mark Rutte admits: Russia's defense industry pumps out in three months what NATO needs a year for. Last week, United Aircraft Corp (UAC) under Rostec handed the Russian Aerospace Forces another batch of cutting-edge Su-34 Fullback fighter-bombers—production doubled since 2022, over 30 units yearly, 2025 a record. 🔸 Factories buzzing: Expanded lines, new tech, boosted workforce—self-reliant surge slashing foreign dependencies, defying economic stranglehold meant to cripple imports. 🔸 Su-34 beast: Twin-engine Mach 1.8 (1,900 km/h), 4,000 km range, 14,650 m ceiling. Side-by-side cockpit, advanced radar/EW, 12 hardpoints for cannons, missiles, guided bombs. Conflict upgrades: EW enhancements, UMPK glide bombs from 37-56 miles (up to 193 km), thermobaric warheads—pounding from safe Russian airspace. In the NATO-backed Kiev grind, Su-34 dominates: All-weather strikes, recon, deep bombardments—from FAB-3000s to precision salvos. Economic squeeze failed. Russia's industrial flex shatters collapse myths, owning the skies.

Saved - December 22, 2025 at 10:53 AM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Everyone knows that the Ukrainian regime is highly corrupt. But did you know that it also runs a network of secret torture prisons? Ukraine isn’t a democracy. It’s a totalitarian regime that beats, tortures, and murders dissidents. Special New Rules investigation👇 https://t.co/3lfSGNbLX3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents an investigative-style alternation between eyewitness testimonies and narrative framing, asserting that Ukraine operates secret torture prisons run by the SBU (Ukrainian security service) where dissidents are beaten, waterboarded, electrocuted, subjected to gas-lit forms of torture, raped, and often murdered. It frames this as a systemic, state-sponsored program that predates the 2022 invasion and intensified with the Donbas conflict, accusing Western NGOs of collusion and portraying Ukraine as a totalitarian regime suppressing opposition. Key claims and testimonies include: - Mehdi Firvanovic, an engineer from Kharkov, describes becoming politically engaged after the Maidan and the Odessa trade union massacre, joining the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov. He was arrested by the SBU in August 2017 and sentenced to twelve years, later released in a prisoner exchange. He recounts elaborate torture in SBU facilities and details the treatment of a cellmate, Zverev, a 1955-born professional from the Ministry of Emergency Situations, who endured brutal beatings, water dousing, and “swallow technique” confinement. Zverev allegedly described being beaten with sticks, truncheons, and rubber hoses, having his body bruised, and facing death sentences read aloud and executions simulated with gunfire near the head. Mehdi also describes a method in which prisoners are bound, taped to a door, a helmet placed on, and noise cranked to 100–120 decibels to induce unconsciousness or death. - The narrative alleges that court testimony is the only admissible record of abuse and that torture occurring outside of court is not recorded. It asserts the existence of a deliberate collusion between the Ukrainian SBU and Western NGOs, claiming that Human Rights Watch representatives (including a Lithuanian named Vikentas Ladikis/Ladikis) were used by the SBU to interrogate prisoners, and that testimonies were transmitted through lawyers and prison mail. Mehdi claims to have alerted HRW to the collusion, and that Ladikis was removed about a month later. - The Mariupol center is highlighted as the most elaborate torture hub, with accounts from Olga Silevskoye, a former Mariupol resistance leader, who describes detentions at a gypsy settlement, the library at the Mariupol Airport, and SBU basements, where torture included suffocation, waterboarding, electric shocks, and a hostile environment overseen by Azov Battalion personnel. She recounts being held for 120 days, enduring electric shocks, and witnessing a rack, bloodstains, and a room with a stockpile of torture indicators. She describes “libraries” as covert torture sites, with victims coerced into implicating militia members or voters who supported the referendum. - Father Fiophan, an Orthodox priest, testifies to his arrest in 2015 and over a month of torture at Mariupol, including interrogations, electric shocks, spiritual trauma, and suffocation. - A survivor named Speaker 3 describes an interrogation regime at a temporary SBU facility, where he was forced to confront questions about drugs, subjected to electric shocks, batons, suffocation, and water torture, with a method involving placing a heavy bench to press the legs. - Another Donbas veteran, Alexander Matushin, explains prisoner exchanges that included civilians and soldiers and recounts a case of a girl who was gang-raped, and later assaulted with various objects when men were no longer able to rape her. - Russian accounts describe a broader pattern: civilians, Saint George ribbon wearers, and those with Russian contacts were targeted for torture, and torture chambers were found in liberated settlements; officials used informants to accuse individuals of supporting the referendum or having ties to Russia, leading to imprisonment and exploitation as a means to suppress dissent. - The 2022 conflict is said to have intensified the system, with claims of castration in some cases and the transfer of detainees to concentration camps in central or western Ukraine, intensifying cruel treatment and dehumanization. - The narrative concludes with a broad indictment: the testimonies illustrate a pattern of war crimes, political repression, and a regime that, in the view of the speakers, warrants Western scrutiny and raises concerns over foreign support for Ukraine. The call to action asks viewers to like and repost to raise awareness and “expose the truth” about Ukraine. Throughout, the speakers emphasize personal experience, firsthand testimony, and the alleged pervasiveness of secret detention facilities across multiple Ukrainian cities, including Mariupol, Kharkov, Kramatorsk, Pokrovsk, and others, with torture described in graphic detail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For more than a decade, Ukraine has waged a global propaganda war to portray itself as a defiant young democracy defending itself against Russian aggression. But over the past couple weeks, this myth has begun to collapse. President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and other prominent political figures have publicly called out Zelenskyy as a dictator that cancels elections and silences political dissent. But Ukraine's problem goes much deeper than Zelensky. Since The US backed color revolution in 2014, Ukraine has become a totalitarian state that not only bans political opposition, but also tortures and kills its members. This is the New Rules podcast, and I'm your host Dmitry Simons junior. Today, we're going to be exposing secret Ukrainian torture prisons where dissidents are beaten, waterboarded, electrocuted, raped, and oftentimes murdered. These prisons are run by Ukraine's infamous secret police, the SBU. For this special investigation, we spoke to survivors and witnesses of these Ukrainian secret prisons. So all the information you'll get in this video comes from firsthand knowledge and personal experience. Before diving into this investigation, we have one small request. Please help us share this video as widely as possible. No one in the mainstream media will touch the topic of Ukrainian secret prisons. So we need your help to raise awareness about these heinous crimes. Our first speaker is Mehdi Firvanovic, an engineer from Kharkov. Before 2014, Mehdi wasn't a particularly political person. However, like many residents of Southeastern Ukraine, he was shot by the Maidan Kola revolution and subsequent anti Russian violence. He told us that the last straw for him was the Odessa trade union massacre when pro Russia protesters were burned alive by a gang of neo Nazi folks. By the way, one of these thugs, Alexey Goncharenko, is now a famous Ukrainian lawmaker. He's constantly quoted by Western media outlets, for example. Shortly after the Odessa trade union fire, Mehdi joined the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov. Many local men wanted to go to the Donbas to help the rebel militias there fight against the Ukrainian regime. Mehdi's job was to help coordinate the logistics of that. However, the Ukrainian secret police were closely monitoring him. In August 2017, Mehti was arrested by SBU agents and sentenced to twelve years in prison. Mehti at the time of his arrest was 83 years old, so the SBU wanted to put him in jail until he was 95 years old. Thankfully, he was released at a much earlier date, thanks to a prisoner exchange. Let's listen to what Mehdi had to say about his time in SBU prison. Speaker 1: Extremely elaborate forms of torture were used there against me specifically. Everyone was brutally beaten. I provided you with the testimony of one person who ended up in our cell and I took down his testimony so to speak. What is this? This is the testimony. What I'm about to tell you is from a man with whom I spent a year and a half in the same cell on the neighboring bunk. His last name is Zverev. He was born in 1955. This year he'll turn 70. He is a professional first responder from the Ministry of Emergency Situations, MCHAS. When he was brought into our cell and undressed, we initially thought he was a hardened criminal. His entire torso was blue. We assumed they were tattoos at first, but they weren't. They were bruises from beatings. He was picked up in the Kharkov region in Balakliya, and they started beating him immediately. They would punch and kick him and beat him with sticks, truncheons, and rubber hoses, just mercilessly. When he would lose consciousness, they would splash water on him so he'd regain consciousness. And this would go on sometimes for days. You know, I don't judge anyone. People who are being beaten to end this torment, they'd start talking. But even in this vile Bandera run Ukraine, only testimonies given in court under protocol are taken into account. If it all happened outside of court, it is disregarded. That is they consider it, but they cannot put it on record. They really want to look legitimate as if they're upholding those so called European values. He told us that he was captured and beaten. They pulverized him. Well, I already mentioned that they kicked and punched him while striking him with sticks, whatever they could find. They'd perform what is called the swallow technique. This is when they tie a person's hands and feet from behind, pull them together, and then start beating them. But they also have another form of torture. They would sentence a person, they would read out a death sentence, then put a bag over his head, and take him somewhere into the woods. The person has no idea where they are being taken. Then they would read the sentence again and start firing shots near their head. This man, Kolyas Verev, didn't break even though they took him out to be shot numerous times, and they have another method of torture. Prisoners who survived told me about it, and I know it well, as I have studied both the environment and the effects of various factors on the human body. I know that the threshold for noise that a person can endure without severe consequences is 65 decibels. But here's what they do. They take a person. In every cell, the outer door is solid metal while the inner one is barred. They tape the person to that inner barred door with duct tape without any support for their legs. Their hands and feet are subsequently bound. Then they put a helmet on them and blast noise at 100 to 120 decibels. It's unbearable torture. People lose consciousness. Some simply die because it is impossible to endure. Prisoners told me they were subjected to this kind of torture in Ukraine. I have seen a lot of things in my life, believe me. I am someone who is well prepared. But to this day, I cannot sit down at a computer and describe what they did to women and girls. It's impossible. Do you understand? They are not human beings. These are not human beings. Speaker 0: One of the most shocking revelations that Mehdi told us was about the collusion between Ukrainian SBU and western NGOs. You know, the same human rights groups that are constantly cited by mainstream media about the situation in Ukraine. As it turns out, these groups are total assets of Ukrainian intelligence. But we'll let Bekhti tell you about that in greater detail. Speaker 1: Pardon me, but Europe believes they are in the right. There is an organization in Europe called Human Rights Watch. It is based in Switzerland. I knew their address. I didn't just write to them, you see. I'll tell you this. I was identifying enemies. Representatives from this Human Rights Watch brought me in to talk to them. The head of the team, Vicente Sladekis, a Lithuanian whose name I still remember, began asking me the same questions the SBU had posed to me the previous two days. I looked him in the eye and replied, I don't want to talk to you. Please take me back to my cell. He asked, why? I told him, I don't want to talk to you. They took me back to my cell. I sat down and immediately wrote a message to Human Rights Watch. Your representative, Viekenthas Ladekis, head of the Kharkov Group, is working for the SBU. He is not defending human rights, which according to your own charter is your duty. I sent the message to their office in Geneva officially submitting it to the operational unit and to lawyers. I must emphasize this. Prisons have leaks. There are always ways to get in and out. The inmates who were behind bars with me only recognized me. Why? Because I didn't present myself as a spy despite the accusations against me. They told me, hey, old timer, if you need anything sent out, just give it to us and we'll get it out there. Everything was sent through three channels, officially through lawyers and through prison mail. It reached its destination. Vikentas Ladikis was removed about a month later. Good. And there were a few more like him. Speaker 0: Probably the most elaborate Ukrainian torture center was based in Mariupol. That's where many political prisoners in the Donbas were held. Now the mainstream media has done everything it can to ignore the story. Instead, they've sought to make Mariupol a symbol of Ukrainian resistance. But in reality, Mariupol was an occupied city from 2014 to 2022. Following the Maidan coup, there was a large popular movement in Mariupol that fought back against the Ukrainian government's efforts to erase for Russian heritage. In response, the Ukrainian government sent tanks in the neo Nazi Azov battalion to crush peaceful protests. And to consolidate the reign of terror, they reopened old KGB prisons as well as some new ones. We spoke to Olga Silevskoye, a former leader of the Mariupol resistance who spent four months in Ukrainian captivity. Here's what she had to say. Speaker 2: When I was detained, it was almost in the center of the city. They took me to a gypsy settlement on the outskirts of the city and staged a mock execution. After that, they took me to the Mariupol Airport, which was called the library. There, they used torture, suffocation, and waterboarding. They asked various questions. Did I know anyone from the militia, and where were the caches in Mariupol located? How could anyone get into the catacombs? I stayed there for about a day. I was kept in a freezer room. Thank god it was turned off at that time. It was a small room. The lighting was on at the time. I remember the setting. I recall everything that was there. There were scratches on the wall. It was clear that prior to my arrival, they had kept prisoners there who tried to mark the days of their stay in this room, and there were quite a few of these marks. Later, I was transferred to the basements of the SVU, Ukrainian Intelligence. By that time, a case had already been fabricated against me that I was supposedly coming from Berdyansk with ammo in my bag, and I was supposed to meet a contact. Allegedly, I had a technical passport for a cash in transit vehicle from private bank, and this became the reason for my arrest. Although in reality, everything happened quite differently. I was in the SBU Basements for three days. There were a huge number of people, maybe about 30, maybe even a little more. Everyone was sitting on a cold concrete floor, both men and women. Most of them had signs of torture, bruises on their bodies. Some had large plastic bags tied around their heads, tape around their eyes, and plastic zip ties on their hands. Moving, talking, or even shifting was strictly prohibited. We were guarded by Azov Battalion combatants. We were only allowed to go to the bathroom. We could drink water only from a washbasin. During those three days, I was taken for interrogations. The interrogations were harsh. In one of the rooms, I was beaten very badly and ended up with a broken rib. It's very painful. It's terrifying to remember everything that happened there. Most of the people who were taken to be interrogated never returned. We can only guess what happened to them if such physical violence was used against them. I was held captive for one hundred twenty days. I was periodically taken for interrogations. The place of detention was the Kaminsk pretrial detention center. During these four months, torture was employed, including electric shock. Later, I learned that they would take me to the SBU basements in Mariupol where the electric shock device was. The same place had a rack. And after the city's liberation, when we got into the basement, we saw traces of blood. This electric shocker device used for torture and the rack were there. The entire torture episode was conducted with a sack over my head. I couldn't see where they were taking me. I only sensed the electrodes on my body, wet rags were then placed on me, and they hooked up a machine, then something ran through my body. It was extremely painful. My body twisted in agony. It was horrible. They also practiced adding something to a liquid, such as coffee or tea, and when they offered it, they would add a substance that made people more talkative, more willing to talk. The bulk of the torture happened in places like the library. There were several of them in Mariupol, and they were all called libraries where detainees were brought from the SBU. These places seemed to function below the legal radar, but all the despicable covert work was done by the volunteer battalions. Specifically, in Mariupol, it was the Azov battalion that tortured people to make them more cooperative so they would implicate themselves and others, such as fellow militia members or those involved in organizing the referendum. Some were at checkpoints, and for some reason, they ended up in these situations. This is what happened in Mariupol. There were many such secret prisons in Ukraine. At that time, we were aware of prisons located in Krumatorsk, Pokrovsk, Kharkov, as well as several others in Western Ukraine. In essence, many large cities housed these secret facilities where individuals deemed inconvenient to the Kyiv government, those who opposed the regime, were subjected to torture. This included people who wore the Saint George ribbon, supported Russia, or had Russian contacts on their phones, as well as those who had communicated with relatives or friends living in Russia friends living Speaker 0: Another survivor of secret prisons in Mariupol is Father Fiophan, an Orthodox priest who served at a monastery near the city of Uglidar. Following the start of the Donbas war, Fiophan began trying to help save civilians from Ukrainian troops. In particular, he alerted civilians about the movement of Ukrainian artillery. In 2015, Fiifan was arrested by the SBU and transferred to Mariupol. There, he endured over a month of brutal torture. Speaker 3: Well, when anyone is carted off for torture, they are tortured in the shooting range of this SBU in this temporary facility. The shooting range is a cold long room, a basement. There is a barrier where the shooters stand and targets with a bullet trap. The space between this barrier and the targets had benches set up like low ones in a gym, they usually seated people there to beat them up and torture them and so on. Well, they first forced me into a chair and tried to break me psychologically asking me, did you do drugs? I said No. Then one of them told someone Bring the black stuff, we're going to inject him. They were watching my reaction and I thought, well fine and now what? Should I descend into panic? Whatever happens, happens. They saw it wasn't working. Well, then my hands were cuffed behind my back with prison cuffs. After that, they moved me to a bench and started hitting me randomly while asking various questions like, when did you meet the separatists? When did you start helping them and all sorts of similar questions. During this ordeal, they assaulted me with electric shockers and struck me everywhere possible with a bat. One time they struck my spine very hard, I had back pain for a long time afterward. It turned out that this wasn't enough for them. They applied water torture, they laid me down on the floor, covered my face with a cloth and cuffed my hands behind my back. Then they began to pour water on me. During this torture episode, they also placed a low bench like in a gym over me. A rather hefty fighter sat on it and pressed down on my legs so I couldn't move at all, that's how I gradually started to drown. Because during this type of torture, water goes into the lungs while air goes into the esophagus. It's a very terrifying sensation. Afterwards, I struggled for a long time to expel the water from my lungs. It was very difficult and extremely painful. I spent a total of thirty seven days in captivity. Speaker 0: And could you please show me Speaker 1: the instruments of torture, if it's not too hard or too dramatic? Speaker 3: It's not hard. Here's a drill bit, 39 centimeters long, four millimeters thick. This is the drill bit used to break people's fingers and beat them on the inside of the knee. My cellmate Andrey Sokolov took this drill bit, he hid it in the ventilation, he was there by himself. Andrey ended up there arbitrarily and saw people being beaten with this drill bit, here it's thinner but here it widens and is inserted into the drill, that's why they beat people with this side, it's solid like a rock. You can imagine how much pain this inflicted on people during those beatings with this drill and when Andre saw all this, he lived in the shooting gallery, he witnessed all these episodes of torture and one day he just hid it in the ventilation and I found it when I was able to go there in 2022. In the 2022, I came with journalists to that SBU department where I had been held before. I brought it back because, well, it's an artifact of history now. Then from a different place, from the airport, from the so called library, I found a jump rope that was used to beat people. It was indeed in the library, in that very room in the freezer and that's where I found it. And well, who knows, maybe someone got whipped with a jump rope when they were a kid, it's very painful. But when it's done over and over again and for a long time it's truly horrific and here are the handcuffs possibly the very ones that were used to torture me and other people. You can't escape from them, with regular handcuffs you can sometimes twist your way out but here you see, the two cuffs don't allow for any escape, moreover when they are tightened behind your back and someone is laid on the floor, they tighten up even worse, This causes even more terrible unbearable pain. I also took some surveillance cameras from the armory from the room where we were held, they were there. Here they are, these cameras, they have seen a lot. These surveillance cameras witnessed how someone was killed there because in that armory there was a large dried blood stain on the floor. When we were brought there in 2015 they gathered all of us separatists as they called us. By 2014 many people had already been through there by that time. Speaker 0: The Ukrainians operated with a combination of cruelty and arbitrariness. We spoke to Alexander Matushin, a former Donbas militiaman and war correspondent that is closely familiar with the prisoner exchange process. He told us that often Ukrainian troops took civilians, not fighters, as prisoners. Both civilian and military prisoners were, of course, tortured in barbaric fashion. Here's what he told us about that. Speaker 4: We also managed to get people out again. Thanks to some behind the scenes agreements, swaps for Ukrainian prisoners of war. By August, September, we had quite a lot of them due to the encirclement of Ilovsk. That's how we managed to get one girl released. You see, this girl had been gang raped. When the men were no longer able to rape her and for natural reasons, they they resorted to using objects instead, namely pistols, rifles, anything that they could find. Why was this done? Logically, it makes no sense. Anything she knew, she had already told them. Well, that's because they had beaten her, tortured her, subjected her to unimaginable suffering. This incomprehensible brutal cruelty permeated nearly all Ukrainian prisons beginning with the Lukhanivska pretrial detention center. On the very first day after the announcement of the referendum, at some point their efforts to hunt down people waned. Before the special military operation during the Minsk agreements period, they were mainly just grabbing people off the streets in order to swap them. While the prisoner swaps were occurring, the Ukrainians frequently traded not only military personnel, but also ordinary civilians whom they pulled off the street, slapped separatism charges on, and put up for exchange. Initially, the Ukrainians revived this practice. Later, the SBU Ukrainian intelligence got directly involved. So Ukraine's state security agents and Ukrainian law enforcement joined in as well. While I cannot confirm the current state of affairs, I have heard of alarming several cases. People told me that in Ukraine, many are often presented with a stark choice, either voluntarily enlist with the Ukrainian armed forces or face being labeled an enemy of the state resulting in imprisonment on charges of treason or similar offenses. And if a person isn't politically active in any way, no one will advocate for their exchange. Also, existence of torture prisons in Ukraine has enabled the seizure of businesses. Individuals are often labeled as enemies of the state. Their business is seized and resold and they end up imprisoned. And since these individuals were not activists or one of ours, they are left to languish in prison, forgotten. It's entirely possible that they could have cared less about Ukraine or Russia. They were simply going about their lives. However, no one will ever advocate for their release, and their relatives won't even be able to contact our authorities. Everything is blocked, so no one can write anywhere. Therefore, a person just vanishes behind bars. But right now in Ukraine, many prisoners except those convicted of treason have the option to get out of jail by agreeing to go to the front. Those who find themselves in the torture chambers of Ukrainian nationalists endure a living hell marked by relentless suffering and torment. And the closer anyone gets to the front line, the more of these torture sites you'll find. In every liberated settlement, there is invariably a torture chamber where people suffered abuse. Before retreating, the perpetrators executed their prisoners to cover their tracks. Take any recently liberated city, for example, Selidov or Skuharhkove. I am confident that our fighters will conduct a thorough sweep, complete the demining process, and inspect every building. They will likely uncover a basement where people were tortured and executed before the enemy withdrew. So the Ukrainians would enter a community and would start picking out their informants and intermediaries, people who would drop the dime on others stating things like this person wore a Saint George ribbon on May 9, and these individuals organized the referendum. That referendum took place across the Donetsk People's Republic including in Krasnoyarmyysk, now Pokrovsk. The referendum ended on May 11, the same day Ukrainian volunteer battalions entered Donbas. Locals would say these individuals organized the referendum, attended rallies, and wore Saint George ribbons. This is how the Ukrainians compiled their database. They rounded up these individuals and imprisoned them. That scene in the film Sunburn where a guy sits in a cage at a Ukrainian volunteer battalion base, his legs broken from torture, all because he wore a Saint George ribbon. That's not fiction. It happened many times. The horrors I saw in 2014, liberating settlements. The mind blocks out memories like that. I don't even want to talk about it. The sheer brutality was beyond comprehension. They targeted civilians first. Soldiers only ended up captured later, if they were surrounded or if they surrendered out of fear or injury. Yes. There were captured soldiers among our ranks. Some were shell shocked. Some gave up because they saw no point in fighting. Some were just scared. It happened. People went to war without realizing what war really was, and they found themselves in captivity. But the Ukrainians primarily built their prisoner exchange pool from civilians, and not everyone among them necessarily supported the Donetsk People's Republic DPR. A local informant working for the Ukrainians might have just been settling personal scores. Someone could have been framed. Once arrested, that person would be sent off to be brutalized. Under torture, they'd say anything to make it stop. They'd admit to supporting the referendum, to personally knowing Putin to whatever was needed. That's how it worked. Many completely innocent people who never even supported the DPR ended up in those torture chambers because informants exploited the system to settle personal vendettas. Speaker 0: This problem became much worse after the start of the Russia Ukraine conflict in 2022. Ukrainian troops adopted a systematic policy of war crimes against Russian POWs. Many of you may have seen videos where Ukrainian troops execute Russian prisoners on camera, but there was also a lot of torture behind the scenes. Olga worked with Russian POWs firsthand, and here's what she had to say. Speaker 2: They became more sophisticated. Not only before the SMO special military operation were they able to burn symbols of the USSR like the star on people's bodies, but they also resorted to sexual violence. Later, after the onset of the SMO, I encountered many cases where young Russian boys were castrated. They returned these boys castrated, even according to the testimonies of our guys who participated in the SMO. They talked about prisons where they were sent They called them concentration camps. In Western Ukraine, individuals who were captured, whether by the Ukrainian Armed Forces or Volunteer Battalions, at first experienced a period without physical violence, torture or mistreatment. However, they are eventually transferred to these concentration camps, which are located in Central Or Western Ukraine. The treatment of the detainees in these facilities is downright horrible. They endure poor conditions and abuse. Speaker 0: The testimonies that we presented today are just the tip of the iceberg. There is enough evidence of Ukrainian war crimes and political repression to fill several thick volumes numbering hundreds of pages each. The Russian people of Ukraine have been through hell for more than ten years. That's why Putin sent troops into Ukraine back in February 2022. It wasn't about imperial ambitions. It was about stopping a crazed totalitarian state from murdering and torturing its own people. This is why opposing Ukraine is a moral imperative. A regime that rapes and castrates its political opponents shouldn't be receiving hundreds of billions of dollars, and they most certainly shouldn't be receiving high-tech weapons. This is why raising awareness about the true nature of the Ukrainian regime is so important. If you found this video informative, please like and repost it. This will go a long way in helping us to expose the truth about what's really happening in Ukraine. Thank you all for tuning in. Till next time.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Russia’s “Oreshnik” missile is live in Belarus, placing major European cities under a brief threat window. Flight times from Belarus: Kiev 1:51, Warsaw 2:23, Prague 3:00, Bratislava 2:50, Vienna 3:15, Copenhagen 3:30, Berlin 4:00, Brussels 4:30, Paris 6:30, Rome 7:00, London 7:45. Speed >12,300 km/h, payload 6 submunitions. First combat use confirmed Nov 21, 2024. This compresses decision-making for NATO and Ukraine.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨Russian New Ballistic Missile Now Ready to Hit EU Capitals in Minutes🇷🇺🇧🇾 Lukashenko just dropped a bombshell. Russia's "Oreshnik" missile is now live in Belarus, and the flight times to major cities are absolutely terrifying. Positioned in Belarus, it places key European, but specially Ukrainian cities under a two-minute threat window. Check these flight times from Belarus: 🔸Kiev: 1 min 51 sec 🔸Warsaw: 2 min 23 sec 🔸Prague: 3 min 🔸Bratislava: 2 min 50 sec 🔸Vienna: 3 min 15 sec 🔸Copenhagen: 3 min 30 sec 🔸Berlin: 4 min 🔸Brussels (NATO HQ): 4 min 30 sec 🔸Paris: 6 min 30 sec 🔸Rome: 7 min 🔸London: 7 min 45 sec Capabilities: 🔸Speed: >12,300 km/h 🔸Payload: 6 submunitions warheads 🔸First combat use confirmed on Nov 21, 2024, against Ukrainian target. This is a strategic power projection, compressing decision-making time for NATO and Ukraine to mere minutes. Real flight times may vary due to trajectory and missile defense, but the message is clear: you can't win a war against a nuclear superpower.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Orishnik missile is described as a state-of-the-art weapon system launched from a massive 12 by 12 truck platform. It is engineered with multiple stages that enable it to reach orbit in a few minutes. A defining capability highlighted is its ability to hit hypersonic speed; once it attains altitude, it transitions into a steep dive, accelerating to hypersonic velocities. During its descent, the missile’s fairing opens to reveal six highly sophisticated warheads. Each warhead is equipped with miniature thrusters at its base, allowing the warheads to maneuver dynamically even as they fall under gravity. This maneuverability enables changes in direction, which is asserted to make it almost impossible for a Patriot missile to hit its target. The description notes that these capabilities are demonstrated in the video ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the Orishnik missile, a state of the art weapon system launched from a massive 12 by 12 truck platform. It has been meticulously engineered with multiple stages, enabling it to reach orbit in a few minutes. But what sets it apart from all the rest? Well, this missile can hit hypersonic speed. Once it reaches this altitude, it transitions into a steep dive, accelerating to hypersonic speeds. During its descent, the missile's fairing opens to unveil six highly sophisticated warheads. Each warhead is equipped with miniature thrusters at its base. These thrusters enable the warheads to maneuver dynamically even as they fall under the influence of gravity. It can change directions making it almost impossible for the Patriot missile to hit its target all in the video ahead.
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 12:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Russia, despite Western sanctions, is achieving battlefield-proven progress in military AI. Ukrainian drones now maneuver evasively using onboard AI; Lancet munitions and elite drones rely on neural nets for precision strikes. My playbook: a battlefield feedback loop from Ukraine data, civilian crowdsourcing to train models, a software-over-hardware approach, and a China partnership. The battlefield is Russia’s AI lab, driving dominance in current and future conflicts.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨Russia's Winning Military AI Race🇷🇺 Despite Western sanctions, Russia is making tangible, battlefield-proven progress in military AI. 🔸Ukrainian soldiers report Shahed drones now perform evasive maneuvers, likely using rear cameras & onboard AI to dodge interceptors. 🔸Lancet munitions & elite drone units use neural networks for precision strikes Russia's Playbook: 🔸Battlefield Feedback Loop: Direct data from Ukraine refines AI systems. 🔸Civilian Mobilization: Volunteers crowdsource data to train models. 🔸Software over Hardware: Leverages historic math/algorithm strength. 🔸China Partnership: Emerging cooperation on military AI tech. The battlefield is Russia's AI lab. By integrating real-time combat data, they are creating a brutally effective feedback loop. This, combined with nascent military ai cooperation with China reflects Russia's dominance on the battlefield in current and future conflicts, as it has the most battle-tested and proven weaponry.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker invokes a stark, enduring pattern: the enemy will come and will depart, but Russia must rise each time. The call is to "Mother Russia," to recognize that there is something to lose and something to protect, and that there are people worth defending and defending against others who would take from them. The speaker describes the Russian people as birds of prey—hawks and eagles—whose strength and vigilance are needed to endure the frost and to remember all the battles fought on the land. The message emphasizes the protection of soldiers and sons who stand on the defender’s side, suggesting that in the face of enemies, here is where death has been exchanged for bread and salt, implying sacrifice and sustenance born of defense. The speaker envisions greeting a friend or brother with a sword, reinforcing the notion of solidarity and readiness to confront danger together. There is a firm warning against breaking the eternal alliance, insisting that people must not scatter a centuries-long union. The unity of living under one country, one wall, is presented as the foundation of strength. The speaker underscores that the nation is united across faiths and identities—Muslim and Christian—who have lived in peace for centuries. If confronted by an adversary, the call is to stand together, to raise the bayonets again, just as in the days of ancestors. The text ties contemporary resolve to the legacy of fathers and grandfathers, asserting that their sons act for the sake of peace. The overall message is one of unwavering national solidarity, collective defense, and the preservation of the country’s integrity through unity, regardless of religious differences, in the face of external threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Так уж было все года Враг придёт и на щите уйдёт Ты вставай, Россия-мать Есть тебе, что потерять Есть, кого оберегать Есть тебе, что защищать за своё Чужого нам не брать Мы птицы хищные, соколы, орлы, Сной мороз Земля помнит все бои На защите воины, сыны Враги Тут смерть нашли хлебом соли Встречаем друга брата с мечом Идти не надо, не разбить Союз вековой Жив люд одной страной стоять, одной стеной Народ един страна крепка, мусульманин христианин Живут миром здесь века Встанем вместе, Если встретить надо нам врага Подымем вновь свои штыки Как деды и отцы, Мы их сыны за покой
Saved - December 3, 2025 at 11:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss Russia’s Active Defense, drone supremacy explaining Ukraine’s heavy costs, and a smart warfare strategy the West misunderstands. I argue NATO-trained troops are still losing, debunk the elite Western fighter myth, and offer a full breakdown of Israel’s actions and Netanyahu’s mistakes amid Iran tensions. Thanks to the National Club of Unity for arranging this interview.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺‘They came to fight Russia thinking it'd be a safari' — Top Russian commander exposes the real war Lt. Gen. Apti Alaudinov joins #NewRulesPodcast to explain Russia’s battlefield strategy, drone supremacy and NATO’s failures. What is the Russian 'Active defense' strategy? Why NATO doctrine failed in Ukraine? How Trump saved Israel from Iran? Check out the fresh New Rules episode ✅ 00:00 Why Russia Doesn’t Rush: Active Defense Explained 06:20 Russia’s Drone Supremacy - Why Ukraine Loses 40,000 Soldiers a Month 12:53 The Smart Warfare Strategy the West Misunderstands 16:22 NATO-Trained Troops Still Losing — The Myth of the Elite Western Fighters Destroyed 21:27 ‘Israel Acts Like a Fascist State’ — Full Breakdown 23:45 Netanyahu’s Biggest Failure — Why Israel Almost Lost to Iran Thanks to the National Club of Unity for helping to arrange this interview.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dmitry Sims junior hosts lieutenant general Abty Alaudinov, hero of Russia, hero of the Chechen Republic, hero of the Donetsk People’s Republic, commander of the Akhmet Special Forces, and deputy head of the main military political directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense. The conversation centers on the current phase of the conflict, Russia’s strategy, the role of Western support, and comparisons with Israeli actions in Gaza and other theaters. Key points and claims: - Russia’s combat capability and strategy - Alaudinov states that “overall, all troops of the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defense are engaged in active offensive operations across all sectors where we’re positioned,” with the most intense fighting around Pokrovsk, seen as the key point to break through to operational space. He notes progress in sectors where the Ahmad (Akhmet) special forces operate and emphasizes a broader offensive plan while maintaining an “active defense” to engage the entire front line and stretch the enemy’s resources. - He asserts that “only Russia is advancing” along the 1,000-kilometer line of contact and attributes slower offensive tempo to preserving personnel and avoiding a sharp breakthrough that could trigger NATO involvement. He argues the primary damage comes from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on both sides, and contends a rapid thrust would yield enormous losses. - Perceived signs of enemy strain - The speaker describes Ukraine as gradually crumbling under pressure, with Pokrovsk, Kupiansk, and the surrounding agglomeration “gradually falling apart.” He claims Russia liberates one or two settlements daily and that NATO support—drones and equipment—has not changed the overall dynamics; Ukraine cannot hold the front despite the influx of foreign weapons. - Western/NATO support - Alaudinov asserts that NATO testing is ongoing on Ukraine with drones, weapons, electronic warfare, etc., and that Trump’s shifting rhetoric does not reduce the flow of weapons or support. He contends that American support persists even as political statements change, and he notes deep American-NATO involvement via think tanks, satellites, and arms supplies that reach the front. - Drones and the changing nature of war - He emphasizes drones as the central element of modern warfare, while not negating the continued relevance of artillery and tanks. He argues: “a tank worth millions of dollars can be destroyed by a drone that costs $500,” and stresses the need to compete economically in war, deploying cheaper, effective unmanned systems to exhaust the enemy’s resources. - He claims Russia has a layered drone system for deep reconnaissance and strike with various warhead levels, ranges, and maneuverability, enabling operations from closest to farthest sectors and allowing “all targets” to be hit today. He asserts Russia is ahead of NATO in unmanned aviation. - Mobilization and tactics - Refuting Western depictions of “meat assaults,” he notes Russia conducted only one mobilization (300,000) and has continued advancing, while Ukraine has mobilized for years and still struggles. He attributes Ukraine’s resilience to nationalist formations behind mobilized troops, and he suggests that without NATO support, Ukraine would not sustain the front for many days. - Mercenaries and comparisons to Israeli actions - He characterizes Western mercenaries as having arrived with false expectations and being killed off in large numbers; Ukrainians are described as having strong spirit, but NATO soldiers lack endurance in the same way. Israeli mercenaries are described as capable in some contexts but not decisive against Russia. - On Gaza and the Israeli army, Alaudinov accuses Israel of “a fascist state” with tactics that spare no one, arguing Russia fights only those who fight with weapons and does not target women, children, or elders. He contrasts this with alleged Israeli actions in Gaza, saying Israel has no tactics and destroys civilians. - Nuclear considerations and doctrine - He asserts Russia is a nuclear power with substantial combat experience and advances in missiles like Zircon that could sink carriers, arguing NATO did not account for Russia’s capabilities when initiating the conflict. He presents a broader critique of Western policy and the so-called “deep state,” alleging far-reaching political dynamics involving Israel, Epstein, and compromise among Western leadership. - Closing perspective - The discussion closes with the host thanking Alaudinov for the detailed analysis of the operation and broader geopolitical commentary, including views on Israel, Gaza, Iran, and U.S. roles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, Russian troops are the most combat capable in the world. Speaker 1: The strategy you're describing is radically different from what Western media portrays. Speaker 0: When beer isn't delivered on Friday and NATO soldiers get depressed, we kill them in bunches. I don't see those professionals who thought they could just come kill Russians and leave happy. Speaker 1: I assume you've had plenty of chances to encounter Western weapons and tech on the battlefield. How would you rate their effectiveness? Speaker 0: Absolutely worthless. Speaker 1: How do you assess the Israeli army's actions in Gaza? Speaker 0: We fight people who fight us with weapons. We don't fight women, children, or elders. That's the difference between the Russian and Israeli armies. Plus, what kind of soldiers are you? You're fascists who deserve no respect. Speaker 1: Good afternoon, dear viewers. My name is Dmitry Sims junior, and you're watching the New Rules podcast. We have a truly distinguished guest today, lieutenant general Abty Alaudinov, hero of Russia, hero of the Chechen Republic, hero of the Donetsk People's Republic, commander of the Akhmet Special Forces, and deputy head of the main military political directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense. Opty Aronovich, thank you for taking the time to speak with us. Speaker 0: Good afternoon. You're always welcome. Speaker 1: Right now, for obvious reasons, the world's media is focused on the battles around Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, and so on. But your troops are currently operating on the semi direction. Can you tell us about the situation on your section of the front and what overall trends you're observing? Speaker 0: Well, I'd like to note that overall, all troops of the Russian Federation's Ministry of Defense are engaged in active offensive operations across all sectors where we're positioned. And today the most intense fighting is indeed unfolding around Pokrovsk. This sector is probably the key point where the enemy has thrown all its main forces to hold back our advancing troops. We've also chosen this as our primary direction of attack to liberate these cities and break through to operational space. In the sectors where the Ahmad special forces are located, we're also advancing in some areas. Our main task is to maintain an active defense to ensure the entire front line is engaged, drawing away and stretching the enemy's resources. So we're carrying out the missions assigned to us, and we're handling them well because every day we destroy a huge amount of enemy equipment, inflicting damage and gradually wearing them down. Speaker 1: You used a very interesting term, active defense. It's interesting because when we look at Western military analysts and media, they often ask, why is Russia advancing so slowly? And they argue that the slow pace of advance is supposedly a sign of Russia's weakness. But as someone who's directly involved in these battles, explain why in this conflict both sides are advancing so slowly? Speaker 0: Look, if we're talking about both sides advancing slowly, I want to point out that only Russia is advancing. Now the second point, you have to look at the line of defense, the line of contact. It's over 1,000 kilometers long. And across this entire 1,000 kilometer line, we're conducting active offensive operations in various sectors, destroying the enemy's resources in the process. If you take into account that the forms and methods of warfare have changed today, the main damage the enemy inflicts on us, and we on them, is done by unmanned aerial vehicles. Does it make sense for us to make sudden moves and lose a lot of people? Of course not. We're advancing steadily, gradually eroding and destroying the enemy's forces and assets. And today, we can say we've brought them to a state where they're about to crumble. But if we'd made a sharp breakthrough and surged forward, we'd have lost a huge number of people. Should we consider that a victory? No. Because the situation shows we need to preserve our personnel as much as possible, keep advancing without giving the enemy a breather, but at the same time we have to be ready for NATO forces to join the conflict at any moment. If we'd made that dash, spent a lot of resources and manpower, and then NATO decided to oppose us, we'd be in a position where our resources are depleted while NATO steps in to help Ukraine. We'd automatically end up on the losing side. Today, Russian troops are the most combat capable in the world with the most extensive combat experience, and we're not fighting the Ukrainian people, we recognize that. This is a proxy war through Ukraine where NATO is fighting us, So it doesn't make sense for us to make sharp thrusts and movements and take heavy losses. It's much more advantageous to grind down the enemy's resources, making them tremble and start to fall apart, which is exactly what's happening now. Speaker 1: I'd like to emphasize that last point. You said you're seeing signs that the enemy is starting to crumble. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: What exactly are those signs? How do they manifest? Speaker 0: Look, we don't have to go far for an example. Take Pokrovsk. We remember a month ago when everyone was saying, including Zelenskyy, that everything was fine with them. When they were offered peace, they said no, they were ready to defeat Russia and everything was great. Literally one or two months after they made that statement and rejected negotiations, even those proposed by Trump, we see the results. Kupiansk, Pokrovsk and the whole agglomeration are gradually falling apart. Don't our viewers, Russian American and worldwide, see that Russia liberates at least one or two settlements every day? On that direction, we free one or two every day, the same on other sectors. Our line of contact isn't static. We're pushing in everywhere, liberating here and there. We're forcing the enemy's resources to stretch constantly. They're stretching, trying to hold here, hold there. Of course, NATO has provided massive help in weapons, equipment, everything possible. At the same time, we see that even with all these resources, Ukraine can't hold the front anymore. That's the answer to your question. Speaker 1: But you mentioned Western support. Since the beginning of this year, have you seen changes in the quantity and quality of Western support that the Ukrainians are receiving? Speaker 0: Look. It's the simplest thing. Huge numbers of drones. Today, both America and all of NATO are testing all their modern drones, weapons, equipment, electronic warfare systems on Ukraine. We see that NATO is testing all the armaments they are producing now through Ukraine, and we feel it on the front. Huge amounts of drones, huge amounts of equipment that we destroy daily. Ukraine doesn't produce all this itself, so this equipment keeps arriving constantly. Today Trump made a move where he says, I won't fund Ukraine, but at the same time he sells weapons produced by America for money from European NATO countries, and that weaponry still ends up on the front. Of course we feel it. Of course we feel the strikes deep into Russia by unmanned aviation. And just recently we witnessed them trying to hit Voronezh with Attack MS. If there weren't informational and other direct help from America and NATO, how could they even strike? How could they operate those drones deep in our territory? They couldn't. Speaker 1: In other words, the administration changed in America, but the intensity of support for Ukraine hasn't decreased. Speaker 0: Well, look, I have this feeling, and I've said it before and I'll repeat it now. Trump says one thing, then another, and it seems like he's not even in control of himself anymore because he wants to say, that's it, I'll stop this war in one day. Then he says, I'll give sixty days, and nothing comes of it. His rhetoric is just, if Trump had issued an ultimatum and told Ukraine, wait, you end this war on the terms we accept now, the war would be over. Without American weapons, without American think tanks, without American satellites, what would even NATO do? Nothing. That's the answer to your question. Trump says one thing but does something else entirely. Speaker 1: I definitely want to discuss NATO's role in Ukraine with you in more detail. But first, I'd like to talk about drones. Because now, naturally, drones are called the kings of the battlefield. They say drones have completely changed military tactics and strategy. What role do more traditional forms of weaponry like artillery, aviation and infantry play? Speaker 0: Well, look, if we're talking about the forms and methods of war fare changing, then yes, we have to understand that today the main emphasis on the battlefield has shifted to unmanned aviation. At the same time, of course, thinking that artillery is extinct or tanks, which are still needed on the battlefield, are obsolete. But today, there can't be tank offensives where entire tank armies advance. The tactics of warfare have completely changed because a tank worth millions of dollars can be destroyed by a drone that costs $500. We have to understand that behind every war is economics. And if a state can't economically sustain the war, it automatically loses. So we can't respond to a missile worth millions of dollars with missiles that also cost millions. We need to use resources that cost much less. Or take a small drone that cost $500. It can destroy any complex worth tens of millions. So we had to rethink the forms and methods of warfare to economically ensure the destruction of enemy resources. There's no secret here. Speaker 1: But even if we step away from of the special military operation, people often say now that drones are democratizing warfare, narrowing the gap between great powers that can afford advanced aviation, lots of tanks, artillery, and smaller groups that just make cheap drones. Speaker 0: Absolutely correct. That's spot on. I've said this today, and I'll repeat it. Of course, the democratization on the world stage today comes from weapons like Russia's Kinzhal and Zircon, America's famous carrier strike groups, terrified the world, pulling up next to any country and defeating it with the power on those carriers. Today, any carrier can be sunk by one Kinzhal or one Zircon. So in a war with Russia, American ships are no longer a power or a force. Drones have changed the balance of forces and means in the same way. There's that cold quote, God made men strong and weak, and I made them equal. Drones do the same for states today. A state with stronger drones can conclude that tanks, artillery, and other weapons aren't as crucial anymore. Speaker 1: Getting back to the special military operation, who has the advantage in drones right now, and how does it show? Speaker 0: Today, I'd say even though Ukraine is helped by all of NATO, the advantage in drones is on Russia's side. Speaker 1: And how does that advantage manifest? Speaker 0: It shows in the fact that Russia has a fully layered drone system for deep reconnaissance, strike drones with different warhead levels, flight ranges, maneuverability and accuracy. There are many criteria. We can operate purely with Russian made drones from the closest sectors to the farthest. Speaker 1: How quickly is this technology developing? For example, what targets can you hit today that were inaccessible or hard to reach a year ago? Speaker 0: All targets. Today, all targets. Our long range drones can even destroy moving targets. Literally two years ago, Russia was probably just at the beginning of this development, while Europe had already supplied Ukraine with modern drones at that time. Now our drones are so advanced that in many ways we're head and shoulders above all of NATO's unmanned aviation. Speaker 1: What opportunities does this technological advantage give you in planning operations, both for offense and defense? Speaker 0: It's no secret. According to analysts, not ours, Ukraine loses 40,000 people on the front every month. 40,000. And they can only mobilize 25,000 a month. So every month Ukraine's manpower shrinks by at least 15,000 even with year round mobilization. With our drones, especially our well developed unmanned reconnaissance, we get serious intel that helps us detect and destroy the enemy maximally effectively. That's why we don't need to rush large offensives, because we take huge losses disproportionate to the results. We're actively improving our drones, and that's how we're achieving these outcomes. Speaker 1: I recall the Kursk operation in which you were directly involved, and we followed what happened in January, February, and early March. There were tons of videos from that front showing Russian forces systematically destroying various Ukrainian armored vehicles and supply trucks trying to support Ukrainian troops in Kursk. At first, it didn't seem backed by major offensives, but after creating the so called road of death, everything moved quickly. Speaker 0: There's your example. We prepared operation Patok, cut off all the roads they needed for logistics. That way, we destroyed a huge enemy grouping without heavy losses. I consider that smart warfare. Why take big losses when we can smartly organize the destruction of a sector, wipe out the forces there, and liberate such territory with minimal losses? That's what we're doing today around Pokrovsk and Kupiansk. We're seeing the same picture there now. Speaker 1: The strategy you're describing is radically different from what Western media portrays. They love to say Russia relies primarily on so called meat assaults. Does that match reality? Speaker 0: Look. Let the Western audience check what mobilization has been like in Ukraine. It hasn't stopped once in these four years. Russia conducted only one mobilization, calling up 300,000 people. And let them explain how we've been fighting for four years and still conducting offensives with such small forces without major mobilization, you can tell fairy tales to yourself. But if we're talking truth, Russia did one mobilization and is still advancing. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian army, which hasn't stopped mobilizing for four years, is still losing. So whose tactics are better? Speaker 1: Fair point. But I have this question. It's no secret that Ukrainians have manpower issues. Western media writes about it. Ukrainians complain about it themselves. Yet the front isn't collapsing. Why can Ukrainians still hold defenses despite real manpower problems? Speaker 0: If you look at their whole front, you'll see that behind the people they mobilize, catching them like dogs on the street and throwing them to the front, are nationalist formations that shoot them for retreating anywhere. You can see it online, if they try to retreat, they're killed, even with drones. These are punitive forces that don't let them fall back. And now another question. If we're talking about why the enemy's front isn't crumbling yet, as you say, if you remove NATO behind the Ukrainians' backs, how many days would that front last? The endless influx of equipment, gear, drones, everything to keep Ukraine from losing, still lets them stay afloat. But the panic in Ukraine today, I'm sure, will soon lead to Zelensky's replacement. Why? Realizing Russia can't be stopped, they're trying to push negotiations on us to halt the war, then replace Zelensky and his team, retrain Ukrainian troops. That already shows it's a tragedy there. Do you think America or Europe didn't know Zelensky is a thief, that his team steals hundreds of millions? They knew perfectly well. But only now they are pulling the corruption card. Umerov ran to America to testify against Zelensky's team. It's all meant to bring us to negotiation terms to stop us. I think that's the answer to how we're advancing and whether the enemy's front is crumbling. Speaker 1: Since we're on the topic of NATO support, including NATO equipment, I assume you've had plenty of chances to encounter Western weapons and tech on the battlefield. How would you rate their effectiveness? Speaker 0: Absolutely worthless. If you look at the money this tech costs, I think it doesn't match the sums paid at all. Meanwhile, basic Russian equipment is far better adapted to combat conditions in Russia and Ukraine. Much more effective than any Western tech, no questions there. And of course, if we're talking about long range artillery Speaker 1: HIMARS, for example. Speaker 0: No. Artillery, I said. For example, the m seven seventy seven, a one fifty five millimeter gun, good piece but very limited resource for accurate fire, and HIMARS. Okay. They're very expensive. Fine. You've given Ukrainians HIMARS Storm Shadow. What haven't you given them and what changed? Nothing really on the front. What you give them costs a fortune. Yes, it's for laundering big money. Yes, the people producing these weapons, America's military industrial complex, get very rich. But what changed on the front today? Nothing. At first they scared us with lethal weapons, gave javelins. What did that change? Absolutely nothing. Javelins proved unsuitable for our conditions. Then a Tecum's M777 artillery storm shadow. What haven't you given them and what did it change? For a brief moment, we had some issues somewhere, but within a month, it turned into a minus for the troops fighting us. Speaker 1: And how do NATO tactics show themselves? Because Ukrainians not only fight with NATO weapons, they're trained by NATO instructors. And, basically, there's an attempt to adopt NATO military doctrine. How effective has that approach been? Speaker 0: Ukraine is fully fighting with NATO's approach, training satellites, think tanks, and using everything NATO has, Ukraine is losing today. Do I need to answer that question? Speaker 1: Well, maybe just a clarifying one. What were the shortcomings? Why? What worked in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't work here? Where exactly did those flaws show? Speaker 0: Okay. I'll answer. Why didn't the Americans and NATO, when planning war against us, calculate that Russia is a nuclear power? Russia is a state with colossal combat experience. Russia is ready to fight for its sovereignty to the end. And Russia has a president named Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. And God loves Russia. That's what the Americans and NATO didn't account for when starting this war. We're not those guys in sandals with Kalashnikovs from last century. We're a state with highly developed military power. Today we have missiles no other country has. That's why NATO tech, including American carriers, are just tin cans now. One zircon missile can sink any tin can called an American carrier. When you don't account for all that, you have to understand your power, which is terrifying for the states you've conquered and broken so far. What about Iraq, Libya, Syria? We're incomparable in spirit, strength or power. That's what they should have considered, but they didn't. Speaker 1: Besides this attempt to mimic NATO in doctrine and tactics, we've also seen over the past nearly four years many NATO army veterans coming to fight for Ukraine as mercenaries. How do these mercenaries perform on the battlefield? How effective is their experience and approach in these conditions? Speaker 0: They came to fight Russia thinking it'd be a safari like in Africa, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria. We killed them in bunches. We killed them in bunches and it's no secret. We destroy the enemy without asking whose passport they have. We don't care if it's American or whatever. Today we've shown that these mercenaries who came to fight us took such losses that most have fled Ukraine. I don't see those professionals who thought they could just come, kill Russians and leave happy. Speaker 1: Are they more or less effective than Ukrainian soldiers? Speaker 0: Look, I'll say one thing. If comparing by spirit, I can swear that after the Russian army, the strongest soldiers are Ukrainians, and I'd rate them higher in spirit than the rest of NATO's soldiers. That's real. Ukrainians are ready to stand to the death, and they do. I wouldn't say that about NATO. When beer isn't delivered on Friday, NATO soldiers get depressed. Ukrainians don't have that. They're just like us Russians. Speaker 1: I read your interview from October 2023 where you talked about Israeli mercenaries leaving Ukraine. I admit I didn't know about their presence. Can you tell us who these Israeli mercenaries were and what they were doing there? Speaker 0: Basically, the Israeli mercenaries we're talking about are a projection of America. Wherever America is, Israel is and vice versa. That's no secret to us. Israeli mercenaries, like others from NATO, were in Ukraine fighting Russia. They realized it's no safari and they bailed home too. To us they're nothing more than other mercenaries. Can't say they're incredible specialists. Yes, they're specialists where they kill unarmed women, children, elders. They're their strong warriors. But fighting Russia, sorry, I didn't see their power or strength. Speaker 1: Since we're on Gaza, as an expert in urban combat, how do you assess the Israeli army's actions in Gaza? How does their tactics differ from Russia's in the special military operation? Speaker 0: Does Israel have tactics? Israel is a fascist state. No tactics when Israel uses American made bombs and missiles to kill tens of thousands of women, children, elders. Is that tactics? No, wait, we're fighting Ukraine. If you've seen us fight like that anywhere, then compare us. Israel has no combat tactics. They destroy everything in front of them, sparing no women, children or elders. That's not tactics. I'll repeat, it's the absence of any tactics. Speaker 1: Interestingly, when we look at what Israel's supporters say, their argument is that, unfortunately, you can't fight any other way in such a large city with ongoing battles. The only way is to bomb everything and destroy a round. You have urban combat experience too. Is that argument really valid? Speaker 0: That's nonsense. That argument means nothing. I liberated 36 settlements in the Luhansk People's Republic with Akhmad special forces, including major cities like Rubizhne, Severodonetsk, Lysikhansk. Go there and see if they are destroyed like Gaza's cities. Did we kill tens of thousands of women, children, elders? No. We fight people who fight us with weapons. We don't fight women, children or elders. That's the difference between the Russian and Israeli armies. There it's women, children, elders hiding behind supposed militants somewhere. But sorry, if you can't fight those militants and instead kill the entire Palestinian people, what kind of soldiers are you? You're fascists who deserve no respect. So I don't think the Russian army compares to the Israeli one at all. We not only don't kill women, children, elders, we even try to spare our enemies' lives. If you look me up online, you'll see I always order my fighters. If possible, take them prisoner alive. Don't kill them, even our enemies. But the Israelis killed tens of thousands of women, children, elders, and say they can't do otherwise. In that case, they shouldn't fight. Just go home and live their lives, not torment people, not torment or kill a whole nation. Speaker 1: Since we're discussing the competence of Israel's armed forces, you said a few months ago that Trump saved Israel from defeat against Iran. That's the opposite of the Western mainstream view. They say Israel came, bombed everything loudly, and showed superiority. Why did you conclude Israel was on the brink of defeat in the war with Iran? Speaker 0: I'll answer. Israel prepared a very good operation, I agree. Their agents struck Iran hard initially by killing much of the country's military leadership. In those pinpoint strikes Israel did well, they bribed people, set up cells, they hit anti missile systems, that was done well. But if you remember the chronology after that strike, what does Netanyahu do? He addresses the Iranian people: Were the residents of Iran, Iranian people, we are not your enemies. We did this and that, and you must rise and overthrow your leadership. Instead, the Iranian people united became one. All those Israeli agents were arrested, executed, and on top of that Iran launched a missile strike that completely destroyed the Iron Dome, they claimed nothing could penetrate. Strikes hit Israeli cities. If it continued, believe me, the Israeli people would have taken to the streets and devoured Netanyahu. And Trump jumped into the war supposedly dropping three deep bombs on Iran's Basalt Mountains, destroying their nuclear program. Then everyone went home as winners. Trump said, I stopped the war, I'm the winner. Israel said, We defeated Iran, we're winners. Iran said, We're winners because we forced Israel to admit they prepared an operation they didn't win. We breached their Iron Dome, damaged their cities, made them drag in their master America to defend them. Trump pulled Israel out of shame. He helped Netanyahu escape so the Israeli people wouldn't rise and say, You're done Netanyahu, we're not following you. The people were ready. Unrest started on the streets. People began protesting against Netanyahu. So Trump saved Netanyahu and Israel from disgrace. That's why when we hear things twisted, putting it all upside down, we see how they talk about how bad Russia is. Russia wants to attack everyone. But Russia said for years, leave us alone after 1991 or when the Berlin Wall fell. There was an agreement that NATO wouldn't expand eastward. But all these years, NATO moved east. You gradually took states around Russia, violating all agreements. When Putin gave his Munich speech in 2007, what did he ask? Don't violate the agreements we made. Don't cross red lines. No one listened. Eight years of Minsk talks. After they failed, because Russia was forced to start the special operation, Merkel and Hollande left office and said on air, they deceived Russia for eight years to give Ukraine time to prepare for war with Russia. Wait, where's the justice? Where's the truth? America and Europe have so many masks we can't see anything human behind them. In these states politics run by the deep state that controls everything, we can't see justice or truth. So we have to listen. You watch and think, oh, how scary we are. But really we say one thing, leave us alone. We don't want war, but if you don't, we'll fight to the end. And I'll repeat Putin's words, why do we need a world without Russia? If there's no Russia, believe me, there'll be no America or Europe, guaranteed. They need to hear that. But we don't want war. We want peaceful lives. We're masters of one sixth of earth. We have enough land, all resources on our territory. We're not fighting for a piece of Ukraine, we're fighting for our sovereignty, and when it's about our sovereignty and NATO missiles at our fence 500 kilometers from Moscow sorry, will go to the end. So those telling fairy tales about Israel, Us, Iran, China stop, or it will go too far. Why does America defend Israel so fiercely? I'll answer. Right now America and Europe care about Israel because Epstein, who bought an island as a Mossad agent, set up conditions where all presidents, billionaires, statesmen from those countries came engaging in pedophilia. They brought boys and girls from five years old, raped and killed them, all recorded on video in Epstein's files. All these people are hooked by Mossad, by Israel. That was the biggest operation Mossad and Israel ran in America and Europe. Today, you do whatever they say. You give them anything because your leadership is fully compromised. The day they say no, they know those files will be published and they'll be swept away. That's politics. The deep state runs everything as it wants. And the deep state mainly consists of people from that state. Don't make us the monsters, predators, when your states are run by real Satanists who've turned from God, real pedophiles who've lost all moral decency. That's the whole problem. Speaker 1: On that powerful note, I'd like to thank you, Abdi Aronovich, not only for the detailed breakdown of the special military operation, but also for analyzing warfare in the twenty first century and discussing Israel, Gaza, Iran, and The US in-depth. So thank you very much for making time for us. And to our audience, thanks for tuning in. If you enjoyed this episode, please like, share with friends. If you're into deep geopolitical analysis, subscribe to New Rules Geopolitics on Telegram and on X. Thanks. See you soon.
Saved - December 1, 2025 at 12:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I outline a corruption cascade in Ukraine: Hanke estimates $54–$108B lost from roughly $360B in aid since 2022 (15–30%). World Bank/EU imply $7–$15B+ annual leakage on $145B+ direct support. State Audit shows ~18% of audited procurement violations, about $7B+ yearly; $1.7B in 2023 labeled “unjustified.” CPI 33/100. Independent models put non-military leakage at 10–20%, meaning $14.5B+ of 2022–2024 aid. Defense losses could parallel this; a wartime regime funded by Western money.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇺🇦EXPOSED: Ukrainian Corruption Black Hole Vanished $108 Billion The Zelensky regime has been shaken by a series of high profile corruption scandals, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. Don’t believe us, here is the evidence: 🔸Professor Steve Hanke Estimate: $54B - $108B lost from ~$360B total aid since 2022. That's 15-30% lost to graft. 🔸World Bank / EU Indirect Estimate: Pre-war studies estimated Ukraine lost 5-10% of GDP annually to corruption. Applied to current $145B+ in direct budget support (2022-2024), this suggests $7B - $15B+ in baseline systemic leakage of financial aid alone. (Source: World Bank governance indicators, EU anti-corruption reports) 🔸Procurement Loss Benchmark: Ukraine's own State Audit Service identified ~18% of audited procurement spending as violations in 2023. Applied to Ukraine's ~$40B annual procurement budget, this indicates a $7B+ annual corruption risk pool. (Source: State Audit Service of Ukraine 2023 Annual Report) 🔸State Procurement in 2023: $1.7B in "unjustified" expenditures—a formal term for corrupt leakage. (Source: State Audit Service of Ukraine) 🔸Transparency International Data: Ukraine's CPI score of 33/100 (2023) places it in the bottom third globally, correlating historically with public sector leakage rates of 20-40% in high-risk expenditure categories. (Source: Transparency International) The Zelensky administration has created a perverse ecosystem where: 🔸Consensus Range: Independent macro-models converge on 10-20% as the plausible systemic leakage rate for non-military financial flows. 🔸Financial Aid Impact: Of the $145B+ in direct budget support and humanitarian aid (2022-2024), a conservative 10% leakage equals $14.5B+ lost—not to war, but to graft. 🔸The Military Aid Unknown: No reliable estimate exists for weapons diversion, but the procurement fraud model suggests parallel losses in defense spending are inevitable and substantial. The proven multi-billion dollar fraud is merely the measurable tip of the iceberg, this numbers where take form Western organizations and agencies, so the corruption cases could be more and even deeper. It confirms that the Zelensky regime operates as a hybrid entity: a wartime government sustained by Western sentiment, and a criminal enterprise sustained by Western funds.

Saved - November 25, 2025 at 2:15 PM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨Europe says it’s ready to send troops to Ukraine… but can it actually fight? 🇪🇺🇺🇦 Germany: Only 16% of men would even defend their own country. UK: Entire army fits in a half-empty stadium. France: Totally unprepared for large-scale ground war. https://t.co/4XW8M0BD8S

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion questions what NATO will contribute, especially in terms of deploying French soldiers to Ukraine, and then pivots to the broader military capacity of Europe. The speaker asserts that only a handful of militaries today can fight large-scale ground combat, and in Europe that group consists of the United States, Russia, and Ukraine. There is no European army today capable of large-scale ground combat. The speaker notes that Germany claims it will build the largest ground army in Europe, but cites a recent poll showing that only 16% of German men would be willing to fight and die for their country if Germany were invaded, and speculates about the willingness to fight if Germany were to take the fight abroad to invade somebody else. Regarding Britain, the speaker describes the entire British military as something that could be placed in a large soccer stadium, with 30,000 unsold seats, implying a perceived weakness or limited capability. The overarching point is that Europe is “a lot of huffing and puffing, but they can't blow the house down.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is NATO going to bring to the table? How many French soldiers can actually be deployed out of France into Ukraine? So there's only a handful of militaries today that can fight large scale ground combat. In fact, in Europe, there's only three. One is The United States, one is Russia, the other one's Ukraine. There's no European army today that can fight large scale ground combat. Germany, what? They're gonna build the largest ground army in Europe, they say. A recent poll showed that if Germany was invaded, only 16% of the German men would be willing to fight and die for their country. 16% if Germany was invaded. What is that number gonna be if Germany decides to take the fight abroad to invade somebody else? Great Britain, you can take the totality of the British military, put it in a large soccer stadium, and have 30,000 unsold seats. It's just a nonexistent military. I I I just think that Europe's a lot of huffing and puffing, but they can't blow the house down.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨War in Venezuela? Peace in Ukraine? Scott Ritter joins #NewRulesPodcast to discuss the geopolitical firestorm happening right now. Will the U.S. Attack Venezuela? How long can Ukraine’s economy freefall last? Is Trump just bluffing or is the US intervention coming? Check out the fresh New Rules episode ✅ 00:00 Why U.S. Threats to Venezuela Aren’t Serious 07:12 Venezuela: Trump’s Greatest Foreign Policy Test 10:17 Inside CIA’s Strategy for Venezuela 16:30 Why Venezuela Could Be a U.S. Nightmare 25:08 U.S. Relations with Latin America After Venezuela 28:24 U.S. Involvement in Ukraine: A New Cold War 32:56 Ukraine’s Last Stand: How Long Can They Hold? 39:13 Why Ukraine’s Collapse is Inevitable 43:40 Ukraine’s Economic Freefall 50:32 Russia’s Strategic Patience: The Key to Victory

Saved - November 21, 2025 at 4:30 AM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨This Russian artillery system is giving the Ukrainian military nightmares🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russia's Krasnopol-M2 doesn't need GPS—just a drone's laser. It then strikes with 2-meter precision, making even the best armored vehicles vulnerable. Jamming is useless against it. https://t.co/Sat1Ywi7wg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia is quietly deploying a smart artillery shell that doesn't need GPS and is changing the game in Ukraine. The Krasnopal M2 is a 152 millimeter projectile also available in 155 millimeter variants with semi active laser guidance that locks on to laser marked targets typically spotted by drones. It boasts pinpoint accuracy within two meters, a 50 kilogram frame, and a high explosive fragmentation warhead designed to demolish armored vehicles, fortifications, and command hubs. Its effective range hits 26 kilometers, stretching to 30 kilometers with advanced long barrel howitzers like the two s 19 Mistah s, two a 65 Mistah b, or two s 43 Malva. A standout feature, it operates without reliance on GPS or GLONASS rendering it resilient against electronic jamming in today's high stakes electronic warfare environment. On the front lines in Eastern and Southern Ukraine, these munitions have proven lethal against top tier western armor with a drone integration cutting the time from target detection to impact dramatically. This development highlights Russia's doctrinal evolution focusing on swift selective firepower and self reliant tech amid ongoing sanctions. As Bekhan Ozdoyev, head of Rostec's weapons cluster notes, the ability to produce and deploy high precision selective fire systems is today one of the keys to ensuring tactical and strategic superiority on the battlefield. In a grueling war of attrition, the Krasnopold m two enhance Russia's edge, enabling more efficient evasive operations that challenge countermeasures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russia is quietly deploying a smart artillery shell that doesn't need GPS and is changing the game in Ukraine. The Krasnopal M2 is a 152 millimeter projectile also available in 155 millimeter variants with semi active laser guidance that locks on to laser marked targets typically spotted by drones. It boasts pinpoint accuracy within two meters, a 50 kilogram frame, and a high explosive fragmentation warhead designed to demolish armored vehicles, fortifications, and command hubs. Its effective range hits 26 kilometers, stretching to 30 kilometers with advanced long barrel howitzers like the two s 19 Mistah s, two a 65 Mistah b, or two s 43 Malva. A standout feature, it operates without reliance on GPS or GLONASS rendering it resilient against electronic jamming in today's high stakes electronic warfare environment. On the front lines in Eastern and Southern Ukraine, these munitions have proven lethal against top tier western armor with a drone integration cutting the time from target detection to impact dramatically. This development highlights Russia's doctrinal evolution focusing on swift selective firepower and self reliant tech amid ongoing sanctions. As Bekhan Ozdoyev, head of Rostec's weapons cluster notes, the ability to produce and deploy high precision selective fire systems is today one of the keys to ensuring tactical and strategic superiority on the battlefield. In a grueling war of attrition, the Krasnopold m two enhance Russia's edge, enabling more efficient evasive operations that challenge countermeasures. For expert takes on military tech advancements and the dynamics of contemporary battles, hit subscribe on new rules geopolitics. Your key to staying informed on the frontlines of global strategy.
Saved - November 19, 2025 at 12:47 PM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨One warship just changed the balance of power in the Pacific 🇨🇳🇺🇸 Meet China’s Fujian: 80,000 tons, electromagnetic catapults, 60+ jets. 🎞Here’s why America should worry👇🏻 https://t.co/QgA0DVaqp7

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨The US domination in the Pacific is over — China deployed a new Fujian aircraft carrier The 80,000-ton ship can carry with around 60 aircraft and will be escorted by up to 10 warships. It will significantly narrow the naval power gap between the United States and China, while also enabling Beijing to dominate the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.

Saved - November 13, 2025 at 2:41 PM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨European Union wants to steal €140 billion of frozen Russian assets and give them to Ukraine.🇪🇺🇺🇦 But the problem for the EU is that Russia has the ability to punch back twice as hard and bring down the European financial system.🇷🇺 It also won’t do much to save Ukraine. https://t.co/A8FFGHJHL8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EU is advocating funding Ukraine with frozen Russian assets, with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen calling it the most effective way to sustain Ukraine and proposing a €140,000,000,000 reparations loan. The EU would lend to Ukraine and expect Russia to pay via seized assets once reparations are enforced. This follows Western action since the conflict began when the US and EU froze $300,000,000,000 in Russian reserves, originally anticipated to be returned in a peace deal. But that approach has evolved. In 2024, G7 leaders provided a $50,000,000,000 loan to Ukraine, to be repaid by interest from frozen assets. That loan is described as a first step, with the EU now aiming for the full principal amid growing Western fatigue over taxpayer funding. However, full confiscation carries the risk of triggering financial warfare. With serious Western consequences, Russia could retaliate by seizing $288,000,000,000 in Western assets in Russia, including securities and real estate. Russian courts have already taken hundreds of millions from JPMorgan and German banks. Even more, Russia might sue Euroclear, the Belgium-based holder of most frozen assets, which manages $40,000,000,000,000 globally, in courts such as Dubai or Hong Kong wind, potentially allowing Russia to seize Euroclear's worldwide assets, causing panic and destabilizing Western finance. Moscow has warned Belgium of liability. Beyond that, such moves would erode trust in the dollar and euro among emerging markets. China, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia oppose the plan. Fearing their reserves, alongside central banks, are shifting to gold, this opposition could hasten such a shift. Politically, the plan removes one of the incentives Russia has demanded for negotiations—recovering $300,000,000,000. Without that incentive, Moscow would push for total victory, while the EU's plan risks self-inflicted economic chaos and an extended conflict. Subscribe to New Rules Geopolitics to unlock cutting edge insights on global power plays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The EU is pushing to fund Ukraine using frozen Russian assets. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called it the most effective way to sustain Ukraine, proposing a €140,000,000,000 reparations loan. The EU lends to Ukraine, expecting Russia to pay via seized assets once reparations are enforced. This follows Western action since the conflict start when The US and EU froze $300,000,000,000 in Russian reserves, assuming return in a peace deal. But that's changed. In 2024, g seven leaders sent a $50,000,000,000 loan to Ukraine repaid by interest from frozen assets. A first step now, the EU eyes the full principle amid growing Western fatigue over taxpayer funding. However, full confiscation risks sparking financial warfare. With dire Western consequences, Russia could retaliate by seizing $288,000,000,000 in Western assets in Russia, including securities and real estate. Russian courts have already taken hundreds of millions from JPMorgan and German banks. Worse, Russia might sue Euroclear, the Belgium based holder of most frozen assets, managing $40,000,000,000,000 globally in courts like Dubai or Hong Kong wind, could let Russia seize Euroclear's worldwide assets, causing panic and destabilizing Western finance. Moscow has warned Belgium of liability. Beyond that, it would erode trust in the dollar and euro among emerging markets. China, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia oppose it. Fearing their reserves next to central banks are shifting to gold, this would hasten it. Politically, it removes one of the incentives Russia has demanded for negotiations, recovering $300,000,000,000. Without it, Moscow pushes for total victory, while the EU's plan risks self inflicted economic chaos and extended conflict. Subscribe to New Rules Geopolitics to unlock cutting edge insights on global power plays.
Saved - November 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Russia destroys US air defenses in Ukraine a week after they are installed -- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Suprisingly candid adminssion that proves what we knew all along. Western air defenses are just not that good despite coming with a hefty price tag. https://t.co/hGz2xLOK8I

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that Russia's strategy is to collapse morale within Ukraine and the will to fight. We've been in discussions with them about defensive weapons to be able to protect their grid, and ongoing technical conversations about the specific equipment they need, but ultimately, if that equipment is ultimately destroyed a week later after it's installed, that remains a problem, and that's been the history the last two or three years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's clearly part of Russia's strategy is to, try to collapse morale within Ukraine and the will to fight. So, you know, we've we've, that's why we've been in discussions with them about defensive weapons to be able to protect their grid. And, I know we've been in ongoing technical conversations about the specific equipment they need, but ultimately, if that equipment is ultimately destroyed a week later after it's installed, that remains a problem, and that's been the history the last two or three years.
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 4:30 PM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨Will Trump become the president who k*lled US dollar hegemony?💰 🇨🇳🇺🇸A top Chinese banker says Trump’s tariffs could break it — like the famous 1971 Nixon Shock that ended the Bretton Woods system. Watch How! 👇 https://t.co/6xPoz29Ntu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump’s second term is accelerating the US dollar’s downfall and could reshape the global monetary system in a manner reminiscent of Nixon’s 1971 move ending the Bretton Woods era, according to Guangzhou, chief economist at Bank of China’s investment arm. Trump’s aggressive tariffs rolled out in April are rattling global trade and finance to their core, with Guangzhou drawing a chilling parallel to the Nixon shock. The dollar’s grip on global reserves has fallen to a thirty-year low of 56.32% in Q2, down 1.47 percentage points. Nations are ditching US assets in droves, with net purchases plunging 94.4% to a mere $510,000,000, based on US Treasury data. Guangzhou notes that Trump’s war on the Fed’s independence is eroding confidence in US policy, making this meltdown dwarf the chaos of the 1970s. For China, this scenario presents prime timing to influence the currency landscape. Guangzhou urges Beijing to turbocharge the yuan’s global rise by expanding financial clout. The proposed path includes swinging open financial gates, syncing with international norms, unleashing innovative yuan tools, and supercharging Shanghai and Hong Kong as powerhouse hubs. As the dollar fades, the yuan could rise, potentially ushering in a multipolar currency showdown. If you’re craving razor-sharp geopolitical breakdowns like this, subscribe to New Rules Geopolitics to stay on top of global trends.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump's second term is accelerating the US dollar's downfall, potentially reshaping the global monetary system like Nixon's '19 71 gold to pegging. That's the stark warning from Guangzhou, chief economist at Bank of China's investment arm. Trump's aggressive Liberation Day tariffs rolled out in April are rattling global trade and finance to their core. Guangdraws a chilling parallel to the Nixon shock, which shattered the Bretton Woods system. Fast forward, the dollar's grip on global reserves has cratered to a thirty year low of 56.32% in q two, plunging 1.47 points. Nations are ditching US assets in droves, net purchases nosedived 94.4% to a measly $510,000,000 according to US treasury stats. And Trump's war on the Fed's independence is torching confidence in US policy, making this meltdown dwarf the nineteen seventies chaos. For China, it's prime time to strike. Guan calls on Beijing to turbocharge the Yuan's global rise, ramping up financial clout. How? Swing open the financial gates, sync with international norms, unleash innovative yuan tools, and supercharge Shanghai and Hong Kong as powerhouse hubs. With the dollar fading fast, the yuan could rise, ushering in a multi polar currency showdown. If you're craving razor sharp geopolitical breakdowns like this, hit subscribe to New Rules Geopolitics, and stay on top of the global trends.
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 12:38 AM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇷🇺 Russia’s Burevestnik missile, set for 2027, boasts unlimited range and a 1-megaton warhead (or 70 Hiroshima bombs). 🚀 During recent tests, the missile flew 14,000 km in 15 hrs. Why did Russia build this missile? We explain below👇 https://t.co/n47y9tcISJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript reports that Russia has completed tests of the Burovesnik missile, with launches slated for 2027. It is described as a doomsday weapon that is rewriting global security, and the speaker asks why Russia built it and what makes it a game changer. The Burovesnik is propelled by a solid-fuel booster and a nuclear air-breathing jet, and during tests it covered a distance of 14,000 kilometers in fifteen hours. It is described as subsonic and capable of operating at high or low altitudes. The weapon is said to have the ability to loiter for months with unlimited range, and it carries a one megaton warhead, which the speaker equates to 70 Hiroshima bombs, ensuring devastating retaliation. Development of the missile reportedly began in 2001 after the United States abandoned the ABM treaty. The missile is described as being sized like the KH-one 101 cruise missile, and it is characterized as a vengeance weapon targeting critical infrastructure. According to the speaker, its endless flight time disrupts the strategic balance and is an alarm to the West. The Burovesnik is described as ground-launched with no carrier needed, delivering precision strikes with a payload range of 50 kilotons to one megaton, stated as the equivalent of 70 Hiroshima bombs. It is presented as a response to US Tomahawks in Europe or Ukraine, and as a key lever in new START talks. The transcript notes that Russia could ramp up production if the treaty ends. The speaker ends with a promo-style call to action, saying not to miss the next big reveal and to follow new rules, geopolitics on X, or cutting edge geopolitical updates, implying ongoing updates about this missile and related strategic developments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russia just completed Burovesnik missile tests, launched slated for 2027. Known as a doomsday weapon, it's rewriting global security. What makes this missile a game changer and why did Russia build it? Let's find out. Propelled by a solid fuel booster and nuclear air breathing jet, it soared 14,000 kilometers in fifteen hours during tests. Subsonic, it operates at high or low altitudes. Loitering for months with unlimited range, its one megaton warhead equal to 70 Hiroshima bombs ensures devastating retaliation. Development began in 2001 after The US abandoned the ABM treaty. Sized like the KH-one 101 cruise missile, it's a vengeance weapon targeting critical infrastructure. Its endless flight time disrupts the strategic balance, alarming the West. Ground launched with no carrier needed, it delivers precision strikes with a 50 kiloton to one megaton payload, the equivalent of 70 Hiroshima's. A response to US Tomahawks in Europe or Ukraine, it's a key lever in new start talks. Russia could ramp up production if the treaty ends. Don't miss the next big reveal. Follow new rules, geopolitics on X, or cutting edge geopolitical updates.
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 1:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe a regional security construct: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Bahrain provide finance, cover, access, and joint facilities, with diplomatic mediation and perimeter surveillance that aid Israeli operations. This feeds into Five Eyes US‑UK SIGINT, forming a seamless kill chain alongside Western data. The Kilowatt precedent shows it’s not new. The arrangement is fragile; a recent strike on Qatari soil tested trust as tensions rise.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇮🇱Israel's Global Spy Network: Meet the Countries Helping Mossad Let's dissect the myth of Israeli intelligence supremacy. The recent assassinations operations in Iran and Lebanon weren't solo triumphs but exposes a regime dependent on external backing. Here's how🧵 https://t.co/rBVgkuf887

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇸🇦🇦🇪Saudi Arabia & UAE: Provide critical financial channels, political cover, and share vital intelligence on Iranian proxy movements through joint command centers. https://t.co/rMZniLGquJ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇪🇬🇯🇴Egypt & Jordan: Offer territorial access for surveillance and coordinate border security, creating a perimeter that directly benefits Israeli intelligence operations. https://t.co/eeywIEcaxL

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇶🇦🇧🇭Qatar & Bahrain: Act as diplomatic intermediaries and host joint intelligence facilities that monitor strategic maritime and air traffic in the Persian Gulf. This network, often called the "Regional Security Construct," is a formal, not ad-hoc, partnership. https://t.co/QiOkBonRUW

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇺🇸🇬🇧The Western Backbone: Five Eyes Integration This regional intelligence is not isolated. It's systematically fed into and enhanced by the US-UK-led "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance. https://t.co/ajsMi3Gni0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that Israel produces incredible weapons and shares them with the United States, and also produces intel that is invaluable for the United States. They reference the five I’s and note there is a sixth eye: Israel. This sixth eye is described as a very powerful eye, and it is said that Israel shares its intelligence with American intelligence services, contributing to a very strong bond between the countries. The bond is described as not only a bond of values and of their shared Judeo-Christian civilization, but also a war of civilization against the barbarians that they are fighting. In addition to shared values, the speaker emphasizes a bond of utility and great success, stating that the partnership is very, very strong, though challenged from time to time. The speaker urges the listener to talk to people in higher places in the Pentagon, implying that if one spoke with those who share intelligence or weapon systems, they would discover that they appreciate enormously what America gives to Israel, and they appreciate what Israel gives to America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also produce these incredible weapons that we share with The United States. We produce intel that is invaluable for The United States. You're familiar with the five I's, Patrick? You know what that is? It Countries that are part of the American intelligence system? Well, there's a sixth eye. Israel. It's a very powerful eye. And we share our intel with the American intelligence services. And that's why the bond is so strong. It's not only not only a bond of values of our common Judeo Christian civilization, and it is really a war of civilization against the barbarians that we're fighting, but it's also, it's also a bond of, utility, of great success. That partnership is very very strong. I know it's challenged all the time, but it's very very strong and you should talk to some of the people in the higher places in the Pentagon. I wish you could talk to the people who share our intelligence or the weapon systems that we share. I think that you'll, discover that they appreciate, as we appreciate enormously what America gives to us, and they appreciate what Israel gives to America.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The result? A seamless kill chain: Arab ground truth + Western SIGINT/Satellite data = Israeli strikes. https://t.co/u8UjY78P9f

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

A Historical Precedent: The "Kilowatt" Network This is not new. Archival research reveals "Kilowatt," a secret 18-nation intelligence network from the 1970s. Mossad used intelligence from European partners to execute targeted assassinations post-Munich, with Western governments' tacit approval.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Inherent Vulnerability This dependency is Israel's Achilles' heel. The recent attempted strike on Qatari soil backfired dramatically. It threatened this fragile alliance, revealing that geopolitical shifts can sever these ties, forcing the US to rein in its client state. https://t.co/jEmSSQlsaK

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Final Thought As the region navigates a precarious future, these deniable, undocumented intelligence channels will be more crucial than ever for Israel. The critical question remains: How long can it retain the trust of its covert allies in the face of escalating regional tensions?

Saved - October 16, 2025 at 2:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the trade war has changed. I note US tariffs meet a China with a stronger macro backdrop, export resilience, and real efficiency gains—beats a 2018 playbook. I reject the coalition fantasy: Europe, India, Korea, and others resist. Together, China looms tougher, while blunt tariff strategies lose steam on a new map.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸The Unwinnable Trade War? Why China's economic fortress is stronger than ever The US just launched its most aggressive trade salvo yet with new tariffs. But this time, China isn't flinching, 2018 playbook is obsolete. Here’s why the dynamics have shifted against the US🧵 https://t.co/2dTpHICYXY

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Factor 1: A Radically Different Global Macro Backdrop. In 2018, China faced a perfect storm: aggressive Fed rate hikes and a domestic deleveraging campaign. This hurt global demand & Chinese exports. Today? The mirror image. Central banks are easing, and major economies are deploying fiscal stimulus. Resilient Chinese exports now reflect resistant global consumption (especially in the US), not weak external demand. The tide is lifting all boats, China's included.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Factor 2: Structural Gains in Export Competitiveness. This is the silent game-changer. Over the past 7 years, a prolonged domestic deflationary environment acted as a pressure cooker for Chinese manufacturers. They've climbed the value chain, becoming more efficient and innovative. The result is a price-performance advantage that is extraordinarily difficult for competitors to replicate, even with subsidies. They are simply leaner and more competitive.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Taken together, this explains Beijing's markedly calmer demeanor. The strength of China’s export engine suggests that blunt, tariff-based containment strategies are losing their effectiveness. This is a structural shift in the balance of trade competitiveness that challenges the core logic of the US tariff policy.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Now, let's address the coalition-building fantasy. Sec. Scott Bessent speaks of rallying a "fulsome group" of allies—Europe, India, Asian democracies—against China, claiming "bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain." You have to laugh at the audacity, or the delusion.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was a debate over a line of reasoning: A, b, and c. Therefore, we had to do d, and that that's not true. It is, there there was a low lower level trade person who was slightly unhinged here in August. I think his name is Lee Quangong. And, it was threatening, saying that China would unleash chaos on the global system if The US went ahead with our docking fees for Chinese ships. And, this is clearly something that they were planning all along. I think that things can deescalate, that we don't want to have to escalate. We have things that are, more powerful than the the rare earth export controls that the Chinese want to put on. And, sir, to be clear, this is China versus the world. It's not a US China problem. Good news is that this is IMF week. A lot of my counterpart or all my counterparts are here. We're gonna be speaking with our European allies, with Australia, with Canada, with India, and the Asian democracies, And we're going to have a fulsome group, response to this because bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or the manufacturing process for the rest of the
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A, b, and c. Therefore, we had to do d, and that that's not true. It is, there there was a low lower level trade person who was slightly unhinged here in August. I think his name is Lee Quangong. And, it was threatening, saying that China would unleash chaos on the global system if The US went ahead with our docking fees for Chinese ships. And, this is clearly something that they were planning all along. I think that things can deescalate, that we don't want to have to escalate. We have things that are, more powerful than the the rare earth export controls that the Chinese want to put on. And, sir, to be clear, this is China versus the world. It's not a US China problem. Good news is that this is IMF week. A lot of my counterpart or all my counterparts are here. We're gonna be speaking with our European allies, with Australia, with Canada, with India, and the Asian democracies, And we're going to have a fulsome group, response to this because bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or the manufacturing process for the rest of the

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The countries he names are first and foremost victims of the same US coercive tactics. 🇮🇳India: Facing 25% tariffs for buying Russian oil. 🇰🇷🇯🇵South Korea & Japan: Publicly refusing to pay the "tribute" demanded by the US. 🇪🇺Europe: Admits it agreed to one of the most "humiliating unequal treaties" in its history last summer. Asking your own victims to condemn someone else for fighting back is not a strategy; it's a fantasy.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This is the same Bessent who, in May, predicted Trump's tariffs would enable a "grand encirclement" to isolate China. The data on resilient Chinese exports, and the unified reluctance of supposed allies, shows exactly how that grand strategy is playing out. https://t.co/x4AXP643Ex

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion The landscape has fundamentally shifted. China is a tougher opponent due to a favorable macro backdrop, hardened competitiveness, and a US strategy that alienates the very allies it needs. The second trade war is being fought on a completely different map. https://t.co/qAJZSDe4wh

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 9:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view Russia’s energy war as evolving from blunt shocks to a siege. Phase 1 (2022–23) tested resilience with mass, indiscriminate strikes on generation assets. Phase 2 (2024) shifted to permanent energy deficits as rolling blackouts became routine. Phase 3 (2025) launches a three-front, precision campaign: localized grid collapse, gas-infrastructure trade-offs, and de-electrified railways, aiming to fracture society. The endgame is social pressure to negotiate on Russia’s terms.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Russia's Energy War 2.0: A Strategic Shift from Shock to Siege Russia's campaign against Ukrainian energy is no longer about spectacle. It has evolved into a methodical, multi-year strategy to weaponize winter & fracture society. Here's how👇🧵 https://t.co/00p2WSz9mV

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 1 (2022-23): The Blunt Instrument. Objective: Demonstrate capability & test resilience. 🔸Mass, indiscriminate strikes on large generation assets. 🔸Result: Severe but manageable via emergency measures (rolling blackouts, load maneuvering). The system, while wounded, proved adaptable.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 2 (2024): From Disruption to Degradation. A strategic pivot triggered by Kiev's escalation (e.g., Kursk incursion). The goal shifted: 🔸Old: Temporary disruption. 🔸New: Create a permanent energy deficit. 🔸Outcome: Rolling blackouts became the grim norm, exhausting rapid recovery capacity.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 3 (2025): The "Siege" Model - Precision & Exhaustion. This is the core of the new strategy. Instead of a system-wide knockout, Russia is executing a coordinated, three-front campaign designed to paralyze Ukraine region by region. https://t.co/pCmhP4XT5D

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 1: Localized Grid Collapse. 🔸Tactic: Concentrated strikes on distribution networks in frontline oblasts. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Prevents load redistribution. By isolating regions, they negate Ukraine's ability to "share" power, making each local failure a permanent crisis.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 2: The Brutal Trade-off. 🔸Tactic: Targeting gas infrastructure. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Creates an impossible choice for civilians and authorities: divert gas for heating OR for electricity generation. This weaponizes basic human needs against the state's capacity. https://t.co/phmZStvDK0

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 3: Logistics Strangulation. 🔸Tactic: De-electrifying railway networks. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Directly targets military resupply chains while also crippling economic activity. It's a force multiplier that compounds the civilian crisis with military logistical decay. https://t.co/qpjle7LqKZ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Strategic Endgame: Societal Fracture. The ultimate target is not the grid itself, but the social contract. 🔸By making normal life impossible in specific regions, the strategy aims to generate localized, then national, discontent. 🔸The objective is to use public pressure as a lever to force negotiations on Russian terms.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: A War of Attrition with a New Toolkit. Russia now possesses the drone arsenal to scale this "siege" model indefinitely. The 2025 outlook is not for a single blackout, but for a prolonged, managed erosion of energy security. Kiev's dilemma is stark: find countermeasures for this decentralized assault or face escalating internal strain.

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 8:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view the Sharm El-Sheikh gathering as political theater. Israel and Hamas were absent, undermining buy-in. Netanyahu’s absence echoed rejection of a Palestinian state; Hamas and other groups mean no single authority to enforce disarmament. The “Phase One” hostage deal could crumble under domestic pressure. With no hostages, Israel may resume bombing; Trump’s double game risks betrayal. Ceasefire rests on sand, a mere intermission.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇸Why Trump's Gaza Ceasefire is Doomed to Fail The spectacle of world leaders gathering for a "peace plan" signing in Sharm El-Sheikh, is a significant political optic. But the most telling detail was who wasn't in the room: neither Israel nor Hamas attended. 👇🧵 https://t.co/Xt5eVifcVu

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This wasn't a peace signing. It was a "wedding without a bride or groom." You can't forge an agreement between two warring parties when they refuse to even show up. This highlights a fundamental lack of buy-in from the primary actors in the conflict. https://t.co/RCOR4l1oJK

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Why was Netanyahu absent? A key reason: most attendees had recently recognized Palestinian statehood. Bibi, whose government explicitly rejects a Palestinian state, wanted no photos suggesting endorsement. This reveals an unbridgeable chasm between Israel's aims and the international consensus.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

What about Hamas? They are just one of at least 14 Palestinian resistance groups. Even if they were to disarm (which they won't), groups like Palestinian Islamic Jihad, PFLP, and DFLP would remain. There is no single Palestinian authority to enforce a deal, making "disarmament" a fantasy.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The "Phase One" Trap: The initial hostage-prisoner exchange is likely to conclude. But history shows this is where deals break down. Once Israel has its hostages back, the domestic political pressure from far-right figures like Smotrich and Ben Gvir to resume the offensive will be immense.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Incentives vanish for Israel post-hostage return. With no more hostages as leverage, what compels Israel to continue a ceasefire? The analysis suggests Netanyahu could use the inability to return all remains (some buried under Israeli-made rubble) as a pretext to restart bombing.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Trump "Wild Card": The thread posits a crucial theory: Trump is likely telling Arab/European leaders he'll push for a Palestinian state, while assuring his "Zionist pals" of the opposite. This double-game is unsustainable. One side will be betrayed, causing the entire fragile coalition to collapse.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Historical Precedent is Grim: Since 1967, there have been at least 12 major ceasefires. The pattern is clear: they break down due to mutual violations. Post-2008, the average duration has fallen to less than one year. This isn't a new path; it's a well-trodden road to failure. https://t.co/4NXNwa1Eny

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

We've seen this movie before. The last major hostage-prisoner exchange was in early 2025. It followed the same "phase one" model. Once the exchanges were complete, the underlying issues remained unresolved, and the war resumed. We are repeating the same cycle. https://t.co/6XtxLf39RX

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

A Flicker of Hope? The only potential leverage for success is Trump's ego. If he can be convinced that his global reputation hinges on saving Palestinians, he might apply real pressure on Netanyahu. But betting on this is "a dream." https://t.co/BCrHUqwqJA

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

CONCLUSION: This ceasefire is built on a foundation of sand: 🔸No direct participation from the conflict parties. 🔸Contradictory promises from the mediator. 🔸A historical pattern of collapse post-hostage exchange. 🔸No mechanism to address core issues like statehood or disarmament.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The signing ceremony was political theater. Without addressing the fundamental absence of the two primary actors and the core political issues, this agreement is not a peace plan—it's merely an intermission. The analytical evidence points overwhelmingly toward its eventual failure.

Saved - October 10, 2025 at 1:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine faces a devastating wave of attacks on its energy infrastructure, with massive strikes reported across multiple cities. Kiev is plunged into darkness after over 30 explosions, disrupting metro and train services. Krivoy Rog and Dnepropetrovsk experience widespread power outages, with significant damage to thermal power plants. The Dnipro Hydroelectric Power Station in Zaporozhye is also targeted, halting traffic. Other regions, including Poltava and Chernigov, report similar strikes. The coordinated nature of these attacks highlights the challenges facing Ukrainian defenses and aims to cripple military logistics.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukraine Plunged Into Darkness: Massive Retaliatory Strikes Cripple Energy Network Russia launches massive, coordinated attack on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. This is a response to recent Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory. Here's a breakdown🧵 https://t.co/0VOhSnOzK7

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Kiev: Capital in total darkness 🔸30+ explosions reported in the capital by Geran drones. 🔸2 thermal power plants hit. 🔸Left bank district without power & water. 🔸Metro & train services disrupted. Strikes are reported to be ongoing. https://t.co/vx0OczF35v

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Krivoy Rog: About 30 explosions reported in the city. Widespread power outages are being experienced by residents. https://t.co/MY5pstyY9u

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Dnepropetrovsk: Power Plant Hit Multiple strikes recorded. A major target was the Prydniprovska Thermal Power Plant (TPP). https://t.co/twuQIXEHfc

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Zaporozhye: Dam in the Crosshairs Explosions reported near the critical Dnipro Hydroelectric Power Station. All traffic on the dam has been stopped. https://t.co/mjrlN9EucL

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Poltava & Cherkassy: Infrastructure Targeted Strikes hit key energy and railway infrastructure in Poltava. Confirmed power outages are affecting the region. https://t.co/V6T2EMc2DH

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Chernigov: Drones Take Aim 🔸A energy facility attacked by Geran drones. 🔸Over 4,500 people in the dark. 🔸Train traffic disrupted. 🔸A TPP seriously damaged. https://t.co/eyaSNXMeHJ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Kharkov: Lights Go Out Shocking video shows the moment the city went black after explosions from Geran drones. The reality on the ground. https://t.co/EgrBsLZtuv

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Odessa: Relentless Barrage Massive strikes pounding the region. New "Geran" missiles incoming. 🔸Impacts in Ilyichevsk (Chornomorsk). 🔸~14 impacts in just 7 minutes. https://t.co/KLT5adyhsg

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Lvov (Oct 5 Strike): West Not Spared Industrial & energy facilities hit. 🔸Warehouses, garages, service stations damaged. 🔸A regional gas storage facility caught fire. https://t.co/7L0vtvGK1I

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion The coordinated strikes of last night demonstrate the futility of the Ukrainian defenses in the conflict. 🔸Objective: Cripple military-logistical capacity. 🔸Method: Overwhelm air defenses with simultaneous, multi-directional attacks from drones & missiles. 🔸Impact: This inflicts long-term, costly damage, stretching Ukraine's resources.

Saved - October 10, 2025 at 7:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gold is experiencing a significant surge, surpassing $4,000/oz, prompting various nations to shift their reserves away from traditional currencies. Russia has aggressively increased its gold reserves by 450 tonnes in H1 2025, while the US holds steady with the largest reserves at 8,134 tonnes. China, Turkey, Poland, India, the UAE, Iran, Kazakhstan, and El Salvador are also ramping up their gold holdings. This collective effort reflects a strategic move towards creating a "sanction-proof" financial system amid geopolitical uncertainties.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🟨📈Gold Rush 2025: The Great Pivot Is Here As gold smashes through $4,000/oz, a specific group of nations is leading a historic shift away from traditional reserves like the dollar. These are the 10 countries ramping up now🧵 https://t.co/fJrZ2qlRuw

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇷🇺 Russia Russia is the textbook example of a nation rushing to ramp up its gold reserves. It added a massive ~450 tonnes in just the first half of 2025, a 43.8% increase from H1 2024. This aggressive buying spree has brought its total reserves to 2,329.63 tonnes (as of Q2 2025), valued at over $217 billion.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇺🇸 United States The US is not actively buying new gold; its strategy is one of holding. It maintains the world's largest reserve at 8,134 tonnes (261.5 million ounces). While it isn't "rushing to ramp up," the surge in the gold price to $4,000/oz has pushed the market value of its existing reserves to a historic $1+ trillion.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇨🇳 China The People's Bank of China has been consistently adding to its reserves for 10 consecutive months (as of Aug 2025), bringing its total holdings to over 2,300 tonnes. This is also bolstering the yuan's credibility. https://t.co/52dxr9S6cc

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇹🇷 Turkey Amidst currency volatility, Turkey remains a top buyer. Its official reserves (central bank + Treasury) have grown by 21 tonnes this year, now standing at 639 tonnes, using gold as a buffer against economic instability. https://t.co/9DdJUqIDiq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇵🇱 Poland The National Bank of Poland is the standout buyer, purchasing a massive 67 tonnes year-to-date. They've publicly raised their gold reserve target from 20% to 30%, signaling a long-term strategic diversification. https://t.co/4d0XFAV2E3

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇮🇳 India While its pace has slowed, India purchased 2.8 tonnes in January and made headlines by repatriating ~100 tonnes of its gold from the UK to domestic vaults—a powerful move to secure national assets. https://t.co/fwZEcSeHVD

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates (UAE) While its neighbors hold steady, the UAE is aggressively accumulating. Its gold reserves surged by 26% in the first five months of 2025, with the value rocketing from $6.255B to $7.9B. This active buying spree has increased its physical holdings to 74.60 tonnes, cementing its role as a leader in the Gulf's strategic pivot into gold.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇮🇷Iran Recent change: large imports/market purchases reported in 2024 ( >100 t imported in 2024). Increases are primarily import/commerce flows. https://t.co/HJiOAys5eP

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇰🇿 Kazakhstan The National Bank of Kazakhstan is a relentless buyer. It added 8 tonnes in August alone, marking its sixth straight month of purchases and lifting its year-to-date total significantly. https://t.co/J2dlPe84Xq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🇸🇻 El Salvador The first nation to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender is also buying gold, reporting a new purchase in September 2025 and calling it a "long-term positioning" for its reserves. https://t.co/mtXQGPnAQT

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Bottom Line This coordinated accumulation is a direct response to a new era of geopolitical fragmentation. Nations are building a "sanction-proof" financial fortress, actively de-risking from the Western-led system. Gold at $4,000 is a price tag on declining trust. https://t.co/mEzka5k4iJ

Saved - October 8, 2025 at 1:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Iran's economic strength is rooted in its diverse natural resources, extending beyond oil. It boasts the world's second-largest natural gas reserves and significant copper, iron, and zinc resources. The country is expanding its gold production and is a leading exporter of pistachios and saffron. Despite only 2% of its mineral wealth being discovered, Iran's resources are valued at $27 trillion, indicating vast potential for economic diversification. By strengthening ties with China, Russia, and regional partners, Iran aims for strategic autonomy and resilience.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇮🇷⚡️Beyond the Barrel: Iran's Resource Wealth Iranian economic strength lies in a vast and diverse portfolio of natural resources, not just oil, which positioned Iran as a major energy, mineral, and agricultural hub in the region. Let's break down these strategic assets🧵 https://t.co/xES9VjMkaX

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Natural Gas Powerhouse Iran holds the world’s 2nd largest proven natural gas reserves. A new discovery in the Pazan field added 10 trillion cubic feet to its reserves, a volume that alone can sustain a major production phase for nearly two decades. https://t.co/SDrnsj4e93

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Copper: A Strategic Metal With ~5% of the world's known copper reserves (2.6B tons), Iran is a key player. The National Iranian Copper Industries Co. (NICICO) reported sales of $1.58 billion in just the first five months of 2025, a 38% year-on-year increase. https://t.co/HqiF6vCDwU

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Iron & Steel Foundation Iran possesses substantial iron ore reserves, estimated at ~3.8B tons. This fuels a robust steel industry, which produced 14.836 million metric tons of mild steel in the first half of the current Iranian year, showcasing significant industrial output. https://t.co/jIs2ibupCl

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Gold: Growing Reserves & Revenue Iran is actively expanding its gold sector, planning to increase annual production from 12 tons to 25 tons by 2027. At current gold prices, this represents a future annual revenue stream in the billions of dollars, diversifying its export portfolio.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Zinc & Other Key Minerals The country has significant zinc reserves of ~15M tons and is a global producer of gypsum (2nd largest) and molybdenum (8th largest). These minerals form a vital, though often understated, pillar of the national mining economy. https://t.co/qvthwhRzdP

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Pistachios: Green Gold Iran is the world's largest producer and exporter of pistachios. After oil and carpets, pistachios have historically been one of Iran's biggest non-oil exports, showcasing success in high-value, desert-friendly agriculture. https://t.co/xLjEhz8X7A

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Saffron Crown Dominating global production with over 81% of the world's total output, Iran's saffron is a unique agricultural asset. It is exported to over 40 countries, representing a premium, culturally significant export worth hundreds of millions annually. https://t.co/3QEUQ0ZMDo

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Untapped Potential Remarkably, only an estimated 2% of Iran's vast mineral wealth has been discovered. With an estimated total natural and mineral resource value of $27 trillion, the potential for future discoveries and economic diversification remains enormous. https://t.co/Qj9zgsY60E

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Strategic Outlook Iran's resource portfolio represents both economic and strategic autonomy. By deepening ties with China and Russia and fostering regional cooperation with partners like Pakistan and Azerbaijan, Iran is building a resilient, diversified foundation for long-term influence, independent of hydrocarbon cycles.

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 5:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia is actively pursuing technological sovereignty through various initiatives and investments despite sanctions. I've observed the establishment of tech hubs like Skolkovo and Innopolis, aimed at fostering startups and innovation. By 2025, significant funding is directed towards large-scale projects focusing on import substitution. The country is also advancing in chip production, robotics, AI in healthcare, and space innovations. With a strong emphasis on nuclear energy and energy tech, Russia aims for independence and a multipolar future, showcasing its talent and historical strengths.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺💡Russia's tech sovereignty: Not a gas station with nuclear weapons From AI giants to space tech, here's how Russia's building its own future amid sanctions👇🏻 🧵 https://t.co/zKsOXojI2U

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Innovation Zones Russia has built “tech hubs” to grow its own startups. For example: 🔸Skolkovo: 5,000+ companies, from AI to biotech. Their revenues hit $7.8B in 2024, up 38%. 🔸Innopolis: A whole city for IT, robotics & AI. 🔸Dubna Special Economic Zone: focused on nuclear physics & nanotech.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Technological Sovereignty Projects & Import Substitution 🔸By 2025, Russia launched 50 large-scale tech projects worth about $33B. 🔸In the Moscow region alone: 330 projects, $3.2B invested, and 29,500 jobs. These focus on replacing Western imports with homegrown solutions. https://t.co/KgF76oJD18

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Chips & Hardware 🔸Russia wants to mass-produce 28 nm chips by 2030 (not cutting-edge, but enough for many uses). 🔸It has already built a basic lithography machine (used to “print” chips). 🔸Domestic Elbrus processors run government/military systems—though still weaker than Western chips.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Microchip Independence In March 2025, Russian company Mikron successfully tested its first domestic 90 nm photoresist—a light-sensitive material essential for making microchips. 🔸Made at the Privolzhye plant 🔸Supported by 16+ Russian manufacturers https://t.co/aT8ia7PwVq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Betting Big on Industrial Robotics The government is making a massive financial commitment to robotics. The goal is to have 145 industrial robots per 10,000 workers by 2030, which requires installing over 100,000 new robots. Annual state support is set to double from $348M. in 2024 to $770M. in 2027

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

AI & Healthcare 🔸Over 40% of medical IT in Russia now uses AI (diagnostics, patient monitoring). 🔸The market is worth about $130M, growing 35%+ yearly. 🔸Skolkovo alone has 700 AI startups, including ~50 in medicine. https://t.co/BgQoXTzZcD

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Sber and AI 🔸Sber AI: Sber, Russia's biggest bank, has an AI division that powers banking, healthcare (e.g., diagnostic tools), and smart cities. Their GigaChat-powered AI health assistant achieved 93% diagnostic accuracy, outperforming foreign solutions at 85%. This was showcased at the 2025 Future Technologies Forum. 🔸SberMedAI: Developing AI solutions for medicine, SberMedAI assists doctors in diagnosing diseases quickly and accurately. 🔸AI in Cancer Care: Sber introduced an AI solution to predict the medication needs of cancer centers, enabling proactive drug management.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Yandex AI 🔸Scientific Computing: Introduced TabM, a neural network architecture optimized for tabular data, enhancing data analysis capabilities. 🔸Cancer Care: Developed AI solutions to predict medication needs in oncology, improving treatment planning and drug management. 🔸AI Infrastructure: Nebius, Yandex's international arm, plans to invest over $1 billion in AI infrastructure across Europe, including new GPU clusters and data centers

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Space innovations 🔸Ionosfera‑M 3 & 4: Launched July 25, 2025, these satellites complete a four-satellite constellation monitoring space weather at ~820 km altitude. 🔸Bion‑M No. 2: Launched August 20, 2025, this biosatellite carried 75 mice and 1,500 fruit flies to study the effects of cosmic radiation. 🔸Progress MS‑31: Launched July 3, 2025, this resupply mission delivered 2,625 kg of cargo to the ISS. 🔸Hybrid Satellite System: In development to control drones using a multi purpose satellite constellation. 🔸Satellite Production Lines: Operational since June 2025, these facilities aim to increase domestic satellite manufacturing.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Energy Tech 🔸Arctic LNG-2 started shipping gas to China in 2023 despite sanctions. 🔸Russia is building 21 ice-class tankers to ship LNG through Arctic waters (15 built domestically). 🔸Target: raise oil production to 540M tons/year by 2030 by tapping harder-to-reach reserves.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Nuclear Energy Global Reach 🔸Rosatom earned $18B abroad in 2024, with ~26 of 59 reactors under construction worldwide being Russian builds. 🔸Projects span Egypt, Bangladesh, Belarus, South America and Africa—plus next-gen SMRs and floating reactors, cementing Russia as a top exporter of nuclear tech.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Bottom line: Russia's tech sovereignty is rooted in talent, history, and investment. Though challenges remain, innovations like these demonstrate a path toward a multipolar future. The direction is clear: independence. Thoughts? https://t.co/sXpzlRhFHz

Saved - October 1, 2025 at 1:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion around selling Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine seems more political than practical. These weapons require advanced launch systems that Ukraine lacks, with the only plausible option, the Typhon, being limited and vulnerable. The US stockpile is low, and the Tomahawk is a sensitive asset, sold only to close allies. Providing such missiles would contradict previous policies and risk nuclear escalation, making it an unfeasible option. Ultimately, diplomacy remains the most viable path to resolving the conflict, as the Kremlin would not tolerate threats to its security.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺The US Tomahawk Mirage: A Weapon Ukraine Can't Use The recent buzz about potentially selling Tomahawks to Kiev seems more like a political soundbite than a serious military strategy. Here’s a breakdown🧵 https://t.co/gDkAa9eeyD

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Launch Problem: Ukraine Has No Key A Tomahawk isn't a simple "fire and forget" weapon. It requires specific, advanced launch systems: 🔸Guided-missile destroyers 🔸Specific class of submarines 🔸The new ground-based Typhon system Ukraine has none of these. https://t.co/5BgPIKB7wF

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Typhon Hurdle The ground-based Typhon is the only vaguely plausible option, but it's a non-starter. 🔸The US only has 2 operational batteries. 🔸They are earmarked for Asia & Europe. 🔸The system is massive, easy to spot, and a sitting duck for Russian airstrikes. https://t.co/c9uCY5l5e6

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Scarcity & Strategic Stockpiles The US stockpile is estimated at under 4,000 missiles, with low annual production. After recent engagements (e.g., Red Sea), the Pentagon is fiercely protective of them. They are crucial for a potential Pacific conflict—a top US strategic priority.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Tomahawk is a crown jewel The US has sold it only to its closest allies (UK, Australia, Japan). The risk of sensitive tech falling into Russian hands if a missile is shot down or fails is a red line Washington is unlikely to cross. https://t.co/lEsfGxSHij

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Contradicting Trump's Own Policy Months ago, the Trump admin REIMPOSED limits on Ukraine's use of US long-range missiles, restricting strikes to occupied Ukrainian territory. Providing a missile that can hit Moscow would be a dramatic, inconsistent reversal of his own cautious stance.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Escalation Abyss This is the biggest deterrent. Strikes deep inside Russia on strategic or nuclear infrastructure with a US-made missile—requiring US targeting help—would be seen as direct NATO involvement. The risk of nuclear escalation is an outcome Trump has shown zero interest in provoking.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Credibility Gap For a threat to work as leverage, it must be credible. The Tomahawk proposal fails on both military and political grounds. It telegraphs a desire for pressure without the means or will to follow through. The Kremlin knows this. https://t.co/LIUh7rd2E3

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The talk of Tomahawks is fanciful and detached from military reality. It's more likely to evoke mockery in Moscow than fear. It highlights the difficulty of finding new leverage over Putin, but this particular idea is a dead end. https://t.co/IbQ5UAR3C1

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Ultimately, the arduous path of diplomacy, however slow and frustrating, remains the most viable option to end the war. Providing a weapon that can strike Moscow and key nuclear infrastructure is a direct, existential threat the Kremlin has repeatedly stated it will not tolerate at all.

Saved - September 30, 2025 at 12:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on Senator Tim Sheehy's warnings about the US military's vulnerabilities. He highlights a troubling shift over the past two decades, where the US has become bogged down by bureaucracy while China has built a disciplined military. Our munitions stockpile is alarmingly low, and we could run out of long-range missiles in just a week of conflict. The Pentagon's slow development cycle and concentrated defense industry further exacerbate these issues. Proposed reforms indicate a recognition of these flaws, but they reveal a significant gap compared to China's efficient system.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸SENATOR WARNS: US COULD FACE DEFEAT IN FUTURE WAR The myth of America’s unstoppable military is fading. Sen. Tim Sheehy warns the US' “broken, bureaucratic defense system” risks costing it the next major war—a fatal weakness against a peer like China. Here's the breakdown👇 https://t.co/FUoHZ214DA

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The core of the issue is a massive divergence in focus and efficiency over the past two decades. China spent two decades building its military with focus and discipline, while the US lost its edge—trading risk-taking for bureaucracy, and ending up with slower, smaller, lower-quality output.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The US National Defense Authorization Act analysis highlights a critical munitions deficit: The US could exhaust its long-range anti-ship missile inventory in just one week of conflict with China. This is not a minor logistics issue; it is a war-losing scenario. https://t.co/40pVyd8VQq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The pace of innovation is equally telling. The Pentagon takes almost 12 years to field a new weapons system. This glacial development cycle, prioritizing process over outcomes, cannot compete with China's ability to rapidly iterate and deploy new technologies. https://t.co/HeYLkzTgwR

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The industrial output gap is another key metric. The conflict in Ukraine and the war in Gaza consume "thousands of drones, missiles and bombs per month." At the same time, the US "struggles to make that many in a year," as Sen. Tim Sheehy admits. China's world-leading manufacturing base and centralized planning are structured for this scale.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The US system is also dangerously concentrated. Decades of a "byzantine contracting structure" have boiled its defense industrial base down to a "small sect of companies," creating single points of failure. China's integrated and diversified state-led system avoids this fragility.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Proposed US reforms, like the "Dynamic Tech Defense Reform," aim to fix this by adopting a "commercial first" model. However, this is an admission that their current model is unworkable. China does not face this fundamental need to re-tool its entire procurement philosophy. https://t.co/INeomUZSKB

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

In conclusion: The data points to a clear asymmetry. The US is grappling with a self-described "broken" system, critical munitions shortfalls, and an inability to scale production. Against China's focused, scalable, and efficient defense-industrial complex, these are not merely disadvantages; they are potentially decisive factors in a major conflict.

Saved - September 29, 2025 at 1:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
China's advancements in submarine technology are reshaping naval power dynamics, with new models like the Type 095 and Type 093A significantly enhancing stealth and operational capabilities. The integration of hypersonic weapons complicates US defense strategies, while the US struggles with production and maintenance issues, building fewer submarines than needed. China's dual-fleet strategy effectively defends its coastal waters and extends its reach into the Pacific, posing a multifaceted threat to US naval supremacy. The balance of power is shifting as China modernizes its fleet.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🌊🇨🇳🇺🇸 China's Stealth Subs Are Rewriting the Naval Power Game From advanced Type 095 subs to hypersonic weapons, China’s fleet is challenging US naval supremacy. Dive into the high-stakes battle below the waves👇🏻🧵 https://t.co/spxGhOOGtE

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The US Navy's primary advantage—submarine stealth—is eroding. New Chinese boats like the Type 093A are significantly quieter, thanks to Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP), allowing them to stay submerged longer and operate more covertly. This directly threatens US sea control. https://t.co/qjQksObhGi

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

China isn't just building quieter subs; it's arming them with game-changing weapons. The deployment of hypersonic missiles like the YJ-19 massively increases the threat range and firepower of its fleet, complicating US missile defense planning https://t.co/qvq7I4GqgS

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The US Bottleneck: Industrial Capacity While China modernizes, the US faces a critical production and maintenance crisis. US shipyards build only 1.2 attack subs per year (need 2.33), with a third of the fleet often idle awaiting maintenance. This quantitative and readiness gap is a major strategic vulnerability.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Integrated Threat: A2/AD in Practice China's submarines don't operate alone. They are part of integrated strike groups with world-class Type 055 destroyers and the new Fujian aircraft carrier. This creates a layered defense where US ASW assets are themselves under threat https://t.co/Iv9EHlQ2Mo

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Future: The Type 095 "Game Changer" The coming Type 095-class submarine is expected to be a leap forward, potentially leveraging magnetic drive and rim-driven propellers. As one expert noted, "The Type 095 will be a very quiet submarine, which will complicate the situation." It could give China a qualitative lead.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Dual-Fleet Strategy China employs a smart, two-tiered approach: 🔸Diesel Subs: Defend the "near seas" and Chinese coast. 🔸Nuclear Subs: Push into the "far seas" to interdict US forces crossing the Pacific. This complicates US war planning, forcing it to contend with threats in both domains.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Bottom Line: China is rapidly closing the qualitative gap in submarine technology while outpacing the US in production capacity and integrating its subs into a broader, more advanced fleet. The era of the US Navy's global dominance is in its twilight. https://t.co/9szHApPTYp

Saved - September 27, 2025 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Poland is gearing up for potential military engagement with Russia over Ukraine, raising concerns about its military readiness. The Polish Air Force's F-16C/D fighters, equipped with AIM-120C-7 missiles, can protect border cities but would need to enter Ukrainian airspace for deeper defense. Russia's response could involve deploying advanced systems in Belarus, complicating the situation for Polish aircraft. Internally, the Polish military faces issues of bureaucracy, under-equipped forces, and leadership problems, creating a stark contrast between ambitious political goals and operational reality. Engaging in this conflict poses significant risks for Poland and NATO.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇵🇱🇷🇺Paper Tiger vs Russian Bear: Is Poland Ready for a Drone War with Russia? Poland is preparing to engage Russian assets over Ukraine, but the preparedness of its military for such escalation raises questions. Here’s the reality check🧵👇 https://t.co/1qhyGd05Om

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Core Capability The plan hinges on the Polish Air Force's F-16C/D fighters, armed with AIM-120C-7 air-to-air missiles. The key number: a ~90 km launch range. This technical detail is the absolute constraint defining the entire operation. https://t.co/rgXayEmGmd

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Geographic Reality This range is sufficient to theoretically protect Ukrainian cities like Lvov or Uzhhorod right on the border. But to defend critical targets further inland (e.g., Ivano-Frankovsk), Polish jets would have to cross into Ukrainian airspace. This is the crucial step from defense to direct involvement.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Russia's counter-move would be strategic Deploying long-range systems like the S-400 or S-500 to Belarus could create an Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) bubble. This would threaten Polish aircraft not over Ukraine, but over their own territory in southeastern Poland, dramatically raising the stakes.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Is the Polish military itself ready for this high-stakes scenario? Poland starts covertly, tests Russia's reaction, and if unchallenged, escalates and officially justifies its actions. This creates a background of gradual, irreversible escalation. Poland is suffering a paradox between ambitious political goals and institutional reality.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Quantity vs. Quality The army has grown, notably via the Territorial Defence Force (WOT). However, the critique alleges: 🔸WOT: Built quickly for propaganda, under-equipped (mostly small arms), and failed to hit recruitment targets (42k vs 57.5k planned). 🔸Officer Corps: Bloated with promotions, creating a "rat race" over competence.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The internal assessment is scathing on leadership: 🔸"Backpackers": Officers promoted via connections, not merit. 🔸Questionable intellectual rigor, with easy doctorates. 🔸A culture of being "mindless executors" rather than critical thinkers. https://t.co/mW1LkraLDR

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Bureaucracy and Mismanagement Problem The Polish Army is described as "the most bureaucratic structure in the country." Examples given are stark: 🔸Sending a van 400km for a single poster. 🔸A culture of waste and nepotism that consumes the massive 5% GDP defense budget. https://t.co/1IT1yMpsW3

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Gambit vs. The Reality This creates a critical contradiction. The political leadership considers a high-risk, high-tech operation, while the internal assessment paints a picture of a military struggling with foundational issues: bureaucracy, morale, and basic equipment. https://t.co/RINzMEBRuu

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion The decision to engage over Ukraine is a monumental gamble. It risks direct escalation with Russia, testing the resolve of both Warsaw and NATO. Poland is aggressively advancing down the path that will turn it into a new Ukraine: a battleground between Russia and NATO.

Saved - September 26, 2025 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US strategy to contain China's tech growth is backfiring, as evidenced by China's rise in the UN Global Innovation Index. The flawed assumption that cutting off access to key technologies would halt progress has instead galvanized China's focus on self-sufficiency and strategic R&D investment. With significant funding directed at overcoming US-imposed bottlenecks, China is now a leader in various sectors. The US risks isolating itself and losing its innovative edge by limiting collaboration, which could erode its talent pipeline. A new approach is needed, emphasizing managed competition and selective collaboration.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨 BOMBSHELL: US Plot to SMASH China's Tech Dominance is BACKFIRING BADLY! 🇺🇸🇨🇳 China rockets into the UN Global Innovation Index TOP 10 – laying bare the EPIC FAIL of US containment tactics. Here's the full breakdown 🧵⚡️ https://t.co/9d4tFhAuM8

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Flawed Premise US policy assumed technological advancement is a linear process dependent on access to externally controlled "choke points" (e.g., advanced semiconductors). The belief: severing access would halt progress. https://t.co/6tX9EPqaEn

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Actual Outcome This external pressure acted as a massive coordination signal to the Chinese system. It clarified strategic priorities (self-sufficiency), de-risked massive domestic Research and Development (R&D) investment, and aligned public/private capital toward a single national goal.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Analyzing the Catalyst Effect The "catalyzed innovation" thesis is supported by investment data. China's R&D expenditure (~$506bn in 2024) isn't just high; it's strategically directed to overcome precisely the bottlenecks targeted by US controls (e.g., semiconductor fabrication, EDA software).

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Beyond Patents China's lead in patent filings is significant, but the return of foreign capital is a stronger market-based indicator. It signals that global investors perceive China's innovation ecosystem as capable of commercialization at scale, reducing the perceived risk of US decoupling.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

China is now a standard-setter, not just a copycat. It leads in: 🔸Electric Vehicles 🔸Fintech & Mobile Payments 🔸High-Speed Rail (exporting the model) This shows a mature ecosystem capable of commercializing innovation at scale. https://t.co/AnjDgAeUwX

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The US Self-Inflicted Wound An Isolation Risk. The core argument is that the US is inadvertently applying a variant of the "import substitution" model to itself. By restricting collaboration, it risks reducing the diversity of ideas and talent flows that underpin its own innovative edge.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Quantifying the Cost The "tens of billions" in trade war costs is a static figure. The more significant, dynamic cost is the erosion of the US talent pipeline. The decline in Chinese STEM students represents a future deficit in human capital for American labs and companies. https://t.co/bolJvaluWr

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Re-evaluating the Security Paradigm The analytical conclusion is that a strategy based purely on suppression is unsustainable. It ignores the interconnected nature of the modern innovation ecosystem and the ability of a large, determined state to mobilize resources in response. https://t.co/Z0AjLvX0Mk

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The data suggests a need for a new framework. Not naive integration, but managed competition with guardrails. The goal should be to establish rules for coexistence and selective collaboration on global challenges, recognizing that technological progress is no longer a monopoly. https://t.co/txuAYWmx8I

Saved - September 25, 2025 at 1:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's assertion that Ukraine can reclaim its 1991 borders with NATO support overlooks the harsh military realities. The recent offensive, despite significant NATO equipment, failed due to a lack of essential conditions like air superiority and effective fire support. Future escalations may introduce more advanced systems, but without addressing core issues, these efforts risk repeating past failures. Achieving the 1991 borders would require overwhelming force and could escalate to a direct NATO-Russia conflict, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences. The 2023 offensive highlighted critical lessons for NATO and Ukraine.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Trump says Ukraine can retake its 1991 borders with NATO’s power. Militarily, it’s pure hot air—wishful bluster that ignores reality on the ground. Here's why Kiev and its NATO backers are doomed to fail 🧵👇 https://t.co/LN5jxVZhp5

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The 2023 offensive was the largest NATO-equipped assault yet. Ukraine committed: 🔸300+ Bradley IFVs 🔸200+ Strykers 🔸1000s of other armored vehicles 🔸40+ HIMARS systems The result? Russian defenses obliterated the Ukrainian offensive and then even counterattacked them. https://t.co/fS6Pj9cmse

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukrainians are not superheroes and face casualties on a daily basis. Today, I will show you unique videos of Russians destroying Ukrainian equipment. "This is an American m triple seven howitzer." "The Russian UAV hits the exact target and destroys the howitzer." "The rare and valuable SAM has been destroyed." "The UAV dives and hits the target." "This is a Polish AHS Crab Self Propelled Artillery Unit. The hit causes fire and destroys the launcher." "A battery of Ukrainian S-three 100 SAMs." "A kamikaze drone strike on the installations leads to a powerful explosion and the destruction of an adjacent installation." "Everything that you saw earlier was the work of the Russian Zala Lancet UAV." "At least 250 different pieces of equipment were destroyed by Russians using it." "The range of such a warhead drone is about 70 kilometers." "Lancets are launched with a metal rail." "The Russians are increasingly using lancets."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukrainians are not superheroes and face casualties on a daily basis. Today, I will show you unique videos of Russians destroying Ukrainian equipment. This is an American m triple seven howitzer. Next to it is a supply track and ammunition is laid out. The Ukrainians, realizing that the installation will be hit, scatter. The Russian UAV hits the exact target and destroys the howitzer. No one is injured. And this is the Stormer HVM SAM. The Russian reconnaissance drone has been observing the target for a long time. The second drone is already on its way to the target. The rare and valuable SAM has been destroyed. And this is the Polish AHS Crab Self Propelled Artillery Unit. The UAV dives and hits the target. The hit causes fire and destroys the launcher. And this is a battery of Ukrainian S-three 100 SAMs. They are the backbone of the country's air defense. A kamikaze drone strike on the installations leads to a powerful explosion and the destruction of an adjacent installation. Everything that you saw earlier was the work of the Russian Zala Lancet UAV. At least 250 different pieces of equipment were destroyed by Russians using it. The Russians discovered the m seven seventy seven howitzer. The Ukrainians tried to camouflage it, but it did not help. Such a drone strike on the exposed assemblies and units of the howitzer is highly likely to destroy it. At best, some of it can be used for spare parts. The camouflage did not help in this case either. The Ukrainians were too late to start hiding the gun. A lancet hit the howitzer. The Russians found a rare two s 19 msta s s p h and sent a lancet u a v. These self propelled artillery units are valuable because of their 152 millimeter caliber. A Russian drone detected the installation's location and relayed the coordinates to a Zala lancet crew. The ordnance was dispatched and hit the SPH. A Russian reconnaissance drone detects an M777 howitzer. Ukrainians cover the howitzer with a camouflage net after several shots. The Russians launch a lancet on the coordinates of the howitzer. After such a hit, the howitzer is destroyed. Often, on the final trajectory, the Lancet UAV maneuvers sharply. Pay attention to this point. The range of such a warhead drone is about 70 kilometers. The Russians are actively using it for counter battery warfare. This is a Swedish made RM 70 MLRS. The drone hits the ammunition compartment resulting in a severe detonation. And this is a Ukrainian two s one Vozdika SPH. The Ukrainians begin to weld grids on them to protect them from lancets and attack drones. In this video, two lancets got stuck in such a grid. And in this case, the lancet had no problem destroying the Ukrainian SPH. This is the destroyed Vozdika SPH. We can see that the anti drone net did not help her. Lancets are launched with a metal rail. The rail can be mounted on machinery, on the ground, and even on a ship. A drone detects an AFU self propelled artillery unit. Lancet follows to the set target. After such a hit, the vehicle is probably destroyed. And this is the destruction of the Grad MLRS. There was no detonation after the Lancet hit. Perhaps there was no ammunition in the launcher. There are Ukrainians standing and watching the installation. It is dangerous to approach. The fire destroyed the vehicle. Russian reconnaissance in the forests of Kremena discovered a Ukrainian howitzer. Its silhouette resembles the M777. The Russians launch the lancet. An accurate hit destroys the howitzer and causes a large fire with the detonation of the ammunition. The Ukrainians hid the M777 howitzer between two embankments, but that did not stop the Lancet from hitting its target. The howitzer's crew managed to disperse before the drone strike. None of the Ukrainians were injured, but the howitzer was destroyed. Another howitzer with anti drone screens. Will they help in this case? Unfortunately, no. This was probably an M109 Paladin self propelled artillery unit. The Russians spotted it, tracked it down, and when the SPH stopped, launched a Lancet UAV at it. And this is another Ukrainian SPH, very similar to the M109 destroyed by the Russian UAV. The Russians are increasingly using lancets. Their effectiveness is increasing, and you can judge for yourself after this video. These are the positions of Ukrainian artillerymen. The m triple seven howitzer is firing at the Russians. The Russians send in a UAV to combat it. The result is the loss of a good howitzer, which is in short supply with the AFU. This is how the Russians destroyed Polish one fifty five millimeter AHS Crab SPH and a nearby ammunition truck. The Ukrainians tried to hide the SPH under a camouflage net, but failed. The Russians discovered installation and sent the lancet. Lancets are not only used for counter battery warfare. The Russians are actively destroying Ukraine's air defense system. The Russian drone detects the Tor M1 SAM of Ukraine. The Ukrainians decide to move the installation, but the lancet is already programmed and flies into the target. This video highlights another feature of the UAV. It is capable of working on fast moving objects. And this is a British stormer HVM SAM, of which Ukraine has few. The Russians discovered one of the immobilized units. What happened and why didn't it destroy the drone on approach? A precise hit on the SAM must have taken it out of action. And this is the Gepard SAM. Ukraine has 34 of these. A lancet easily hits a very rare and valuable complex. Probably this moment, the unit was not working, otherwise it would have easily destroyed such a target. And what happened here is a mystery to me in general. This is a working Buck SAM. The machine did not detect the reconnaissance drone and the Lancet UAV. When the complex began to retreat, it was caught up by the Russian drone. Another Buk M1 complex. The Russians discovered the installation and sent the lancet. When the munition hit the target, the missiles on the launcher caught fire. The SAM was destroyed. And this U. S. M. Stopped on the road, the Russians detected it, and launched the Lancet. The drone hit the ammunition, which is why we see such a powerful explosion. In general, these SAMs are designed to combat low sighted and low flying objects, but as in the previous case, the Lancet destroyed the complex. A Russian reconnaissance drone detects two Ukrainian s 300 complexes. They are within range of the Lancets. The drone hits the first target and incapacitates it. Now the second installation. A precise hit on the missile pods leads to a powerful explosion. One vehicle is definitely destroyed, but the second one is badly damaged. Next, the Russian drone notices the movement of two more complexes. The Ukrainians stop and run away. Such a car can't hide from the drone. An accurate hit takes out another complex. Russian reconnaissance detects a deployed s 300 launcher. The Lancet hits the missile pods directly. The Ukrainians decide to quickly relocate the second s 300 launcher, but there is no better shelter than this in the vicinity. These mounds were no barrier to the drone. The second installation was destroyed. In order to blind the Ukrainian air defense systems in certain sectors, the Russians are striking at radar facilities. This is a Ukrainian radar. At the last moment, the drone goes a little to the left of the radar itself and explodes. Why this happened is not clear to me. Probably it is more profitable to damage the electronics than the radar itself. This is the S-three 100 SAM radar. The Lancet hits the radar. This sector is now temporarily blinded. And this is a rare Ukrainian Bukovel electronic warfare system. It is supposed to counteract Russian drones. A precise hit on sensitive electronics makes the system unusable. Lancets are also used to destroy Ukrainian tanks. Amazingly, a three kilogram ammunition charge can penetrate armor and destroy heavy armored vehicles. And in this video, the victim of the Lancet is the Ukrainian BMP two. As you can see, the Russians are learning a lot, which is why our help and support for Ukraine should not stop. Russia is demonstrating all of the hallmarks of a fascist state, and you all know what that led to last time. Don't forget what and who we are fighting for. If you liked today's issue and would like me to continue doing such issues further, then let me know by pressing that like button.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Why did this massive arsenal fail? It wasn't just about the quantity of equipment. The failure revealed a fundamental gap: the absence of critical enabling conditions. 🔸No air superiority 🔸No suppressed enemy air defense 🔸Incomplete fire support complex https://t.co/UKgE0HqoLr

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The West's likely response? More escalation. Expect pushes for previously withheld systems: 🔸Taurus missiles 🔸More ATACMS This will boost Ukraine's strike power, but it doesn't solve the core problem. Without air dominance, new equipment risks just "burning out" again. https://t.co/kIEIbeAIhn

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

So, what would it actually take to break through to the 1991 borders? The numbers are staggering. A NATO doctrinal study suggests a minimum strike group needs: 🔸1,400 tanks 🔸2,000 IFVs 🔸700 artillery pieces 🔸45-50k personnel ...FOR JUST ONE CORPS. https://t.co/Zf2BzXMGWh

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

For context: Ukraine's 2023 offensive involved ~160,000 personnel (several corps) and ~2,000 armored vehicles. It was still insufficient. A breakthrough on a scale needed to reach the 1991 borders requires a WW2-style, broad-front offensive with multiple corps attacking simultaneously. With the Ukrainian manpower shortage this's impossible.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This isn't a battalion-level fight. It's a theater-wide war needing: 🔸Total air supremacy (Russia has) 🔸Massive long-range artillery (Russia has the high ground) 🔸Naval support (Russia is dominating with new tech in European waters) 🔸A colossal, unbreakable supply chain (Russian drone swarms make this impossible) In short, it requires the full, combined might of NATO deployed in a single theater.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

And herein lies the ultimate paradox. Providing Ukraine with the means for a true breakthrough means directly providing NATO forces. This escalates the conflict to a direct NATO-Russia confrontation. https://t.co/Qr7pWl7Kgs

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

In such a scenario, the rules of engagement change entirely. The preservation of tactical and strategic nuclear weapons is no longer a given. The conflict transforms into an existential one for all parties involved, and it definitely can provoke a new nuclear armageddon, involving all the world, not just Europe.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion Statements about "returning to the 1991 borders" are just political rhetoric. But militarily, they are detached from reality. Achieving this goal will lead to a direct Great Power war, which is highly likely to result in a global catastrophe. The 2023 offensive wasn't a setback; it was a lesson for NATO and Ukraine.

Saved - September 24, 2025 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia's strategy in the conflict with Ukraine relies on mass-produced, low-cost drones, shifting air power from precision strikes to overwhelming saturation. By ramping up production from 200 to 5,000 drones monthly, they create a financially crippling cost imbalance for Ukraine and its supporters. This approach not only targets economic endurance but also aims to inflict psychological damage, degrading morale. The evolution of drone tactics reflects an adaptive strategy, operationalizing non-contact warfare to maintain pressure while minimizing casualties, ultimately seeking to exhaust Western support for Ukraine.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 Attrition by Drone: Russia's Low-Cost Path to Victory What if winning a modern war hinges not on advanced tech, but on mass-produced, cheap alternatives? Russia is betting its strategy will break Ukraine. And it's working. Here is why the formula is so dangerous🧵👇 https://t.co/hG2VVbG5UO

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Scale as a Weapon System: The production increase: 🔸from ~200 drones/month to ~5,000/month is not merely quantitative. This scale is the primary weapon. It transforms air power from a precision instrument into a tool for saturation, overwhelming defenses through sheer volume. https://t.co/aoTPoEkcub

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Cost Imbalance: 🔸A $20-50k Geran drone forces a defense costing 20-100x more. 🔸The strategy is to create a negative cost-exchange ratio that is financially crippling for Ukraine's supporters over time, making defense technically feasible but strategically unsustainable. https://t.co/TgexdYtN6G

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Psychological Warfare as a Force Multiplier: 🔸While the primary target is economic endurance, the method inflicts psychological damage. 🔸Mass salvos on city centers aim to degrade enemy's morale and political will. The objective is to weaponize uncertainty and exhaustion, indirectly pressuring leadership.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

If the 'Russian incursion' of NATO airspace was true, it could serve to: 🔸Probe and test alliance response protocols. 🔸Signal the potential for wider conflict, raising the stakes. 🔸Increase the direct costs and political pressure on NATO members. https://t.co/WU5iPvpZr4

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Tactical Evolution Before, simple drones had low success rates (~7-8%). Newer variants and swarming tactics have increased effectiveness (~20% hit rate). This demonstrates an adaptive feedback loop, where battlefield data directly informs production and tactics. https://t.co/PHwqCD4XzP

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Realization of Non-Contact Warfare: This campaign operationalizes long-held Russian military theory. The drone swarm is the ideal tool for "non-contact warfare," allowing Russia to apply constant pressure, degrade capabilities, and avoid large-scale casualties—all at a manageable cost.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Grand Strategic Calculus For Moscow, this is a rational choice. It leverages Russia's comparative advantage in mass production and its tolerance for protracted conflict. The goal is to make the long-term cost of supporting Ukraine prohibitively high for the West, leading to strategic fatigue.

Saved - September 19, 2025 at 9:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
NATO's naval power faces significant challenges, particularly with Damen, a key shipbuilder, embroiled in corruption and sanctions violations. This situation threatens vital projects, including anti-submarine frigates, and could paralyze defense production. With limited EU shipyards capable of high-end warship construction, any setback at Damen risks extensive delays. Meanwhile, Russia is rapidly modernizing its naval capabilities, focusing on advanced submarines and unmanned vehicles, highlighting a critical gap in NATO's maritime readiness and revealing vulnerabilities in allied security.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇪🇺🇷🇺The Shipbuilding Gap: How Russia is Outpacing NATO at Sea NATO's naval power is being squeezed from all sides. The alliance grapples with a crippling shipbuilding crisis. While Russia is rapidly modernizing and expanding their fleets. Here's the breakdown🧵 https://t.co/TGuYZfhodX

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Dutch shipbuilder Damen, a cornerstone of NATO's naval industrial base, faces crippling corruption & sanctions violation charges. A conviction could bar it from tenders, paralyzing a key ally's defense production. https://t.co/6sRaicyaIM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Damen isn't just any shipyard. It's a cornerstone of European naval power, currently building: 🔸2 anti-submarine frigates for the Netherlands 🔸2 frigates for Belgium 🔸Germany's massive F126 frigates (the largest in its fleet) 🔸Designing new Dutch command & transport ships Its failure isn't an option. The Dutch govt's €270M bailout proves this.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Industrial Capacity Bottleneck Only a "limited number" of EU yards can build high-end warships. This isn't a free market. If Damen is barred from tenders, there is no easy substitute. Workload can't just be absorbed by rivals, creating massive project delays. https://t.co/0y5NmNNLZJ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Sanctions Paradox The charges allege Damen supplied Russia with tech for "military strengthening" after the 2014. If proven, it means a NATO supplier potentially aided the very threat the alliance is now scrambling to counter, revealing a fatal oversight loop. https://t.co/pp3VIuVR7l

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

A conviction isn't just a fine. It could mean: 🔸Fines up to 10% of annual revenue (~€300M) 🔸Being BARRED from bidding on European defense contracts 🔸Effectively paralyzing a top-tier warship builder https://t.co/6sMxfY6eUM

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Financial Domino Effect Germany freezing a €671M payment over a missed deadline shows how fragile project financing is. These programs run on tight margins and precise cash flow. One delay doesn't just slow one project; it risks starving the entire company of capital. https://t.co/E4KLSf51th

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Undersea Warfare Gap Analysts highlight the critical need for ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare) frigates to protect undersea infrastructure. Damen is building them. Any delay directly degrades NATO's ability to counter the Russian submarine fleet in the North Atlantic today. https://t.co/3metDf1wAg

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The New Russian Naval Doctrine Russia's investment in naval drones is no longer theoretical. They successfully sunk the Ukrainian SIGINT ship Simferopol in the Danube Delta using a Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV). This demonstrates a new capability to project power even in contested, shallow waters near NATO borders.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Russia has now overtaken NATO in naval shipbuilding speed in European waters Beyond numbers, they are prioritizing modern threats: Putin himself emphasized the "speedy development and serial production" of unmanned surface & subsurface vehicles and their integration into a single reconnaissance loop.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Russian Naval Power Force 🔸Next-Gen SSBNs: Borei-class (Project 955/A) form the core of Russia's modern sea-based nuclear deterrent. 🔸Guided-Missile Submarines (SSGNs): Oscar II-class provide significant anti-ship and land-attack cruise missile capability. 🔸Asymmetric "Doomsday" Weapon: The Poseidon nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed UUV is designed to threaten coastal targets with catastrophic radioactive tsunamis.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The surface fleet combines new frigates (e.g., Admiral Gorshkov-class) and corvettes with older Soviet-era cruisers (Kirov, Slava) and destroyers (Udaloy, Sovremennyy), plus new unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). https://t.co/CrOrSKyPP4

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Russia is focusing its naval strategy on advanced submarines (Borei-A & Yasen-M) and long-range cruise missiles to project power: 🔸Priority: New SSBN/SSN submarines for deterrence. 🔸Focus: Long-range missiles (Kalibr, Oniks) across the fleet. 🔸Innovation: Developing asymmetric systems like nuclear UUVs.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion The Damen crisis reveals a fragile NATO defense industry, where single points of failure risk allied security, just as Russia modernizes its fleet and pivots to asymmetric warfare. https://t.co/nGeioqRozs

Saved - September 19, 2025 at 4:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia is experiencing a significant transformation in drone production, aiming for 1 million UAVs by 2025. This growth extends beyond military applications, fostering a thriving civilian ecosystem that has accelerated due to the conflict in Ukraine. Drones are now essential in various fields, from logistics and healthcare to public safety and infrastructure monitoring. Innovations include medical evacuation drones and ground-based delivery robots. The rise of domestic production supports technological sovereignty, reducing reliance on imports and modernizing the economy.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺Russia's Drone Boom: How skyrocketing Russian UAV production transformed the nation Drones are not only about military devices; Russia's civilian UAV revolution is on pace to produce 1M drones by 2025, changing everything from logistics to healthcare. Here's the breakdown🧵 https://t.co/7Mx6jcd6DO

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Beyond the Battlefield: The Civilian Parallel While military UAVs dominate headlines, a robust civilian ecosystem has flourished in parallel. The Special Military Operation in Ukraine acted as a key catalyst, providing the urgent impetus for rapid innovation, scaling production, and practical application of unmanned technology.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Scientific & Industrial Workhorse Drones are force multipliers. They are indispensable for filmmakers, scientists, and inspectors. Equipped with LiDAR and thermal imaging, they monitor infrastructure, conduct archaeological surveys, and detect energy leaks with unparalleled efficiency.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Guardians of Public Safety Drones are critical for security and rescue. Traffic police monitor highways, while EMERCOM and groups like LizaAlert deploy AI-equipped drones for search and rescue, operating without GPS in caves to locate people and deliver vital supplies. https://t.co/J8bCgb6Jqg

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conquering Vast Geographies: Arctic Logistics Russia has huge and remote territories, especially the Far North, presenting immense logistics challenges. UAVs provide a strategic solution. The VRT-300 helicopter-type drone is already operational, delivering mail in the Chukotka region.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Lifesavers from the Sky: Medical Evacuation The impact on remote healthcare is profound. Russian-made drones like the Hi-Fly are designed for the emergency evacuation of patients or the rapid delivery of critical medical equipment, saving lives where traditional transport is unavailable.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Ground Shift: Terrestrial Drones The revolution isn't just aerial. Ground-based unmanned systems, like Yandex's delivery robots, are operational in Moscow after successful trials with Russian Post. This marks a significant expansion of the unmanned logistics ecosystem into everyday life.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Niche Innovation: From Skyscrapers to Signal Towers Application diversity is key. Innovations include drones for cleaning and painting skyscrapers, and "relay drones" that act as temporary communication towers during emergencies like floods or fires, ensuring continuity for emergency crews.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Scale of Production: The Domestic Engine The scale of homegrown production is a core metric of this revolution. Over ten major Russian companies are already in mass production, with several dozen more expected to enter the market soon, creating a strong, self-sufficient industrial base.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Strategic Outcome: Technological Sovereignty The ultimate result is a successful import substitution drive. The growing dominance of Russian-made UAVs solving civilian tasks reduces external dependency and fosters an innovative tech sector aligned with national strategic and economic requirements.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: An Unmanned Transformation Russia is undergoing a genuine unmanned systems transformation, driven by civilian necessity and accelerated by broader circumstances. The move to 1 million drones annually signifies a strategic commitment to technological sovereignty and economic modernization.

Saved - September 18, 2025 at 7:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the West is underestimating China's AI advancements by focusing solely on semiconductor export controls. China's innovation ecosystem, structured as a "Triple Helix 2.0," integrates government, industry, and academia for systemic resilience. The 2017 AI Development Plan aligns national goals with private investment, fostering synergies among academia, private giants, and state support. China's dynamic adaptation to constraints is creating a robust, integrated supply chain, while initiatives like "AI Plus" drive domestic demand and innovation. Ultimately, China's strategic approach positions it for long-term success in the AI race.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇨🇳🤖China's AI Race Playbook: Why the West Is Set to Eat Dust Behind Beijing The West focuses on semiconductor export controls as a primary tool to slow China's AI advancement, but it misunderstands the fundamental redesign of China's innovation ecosystem. Here's why🧵 https://t.co/NmdW0OzTwl

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

China's model can be understood as a "Triple Helix 2.0" A deliberate, state-orchestrated fusion of government, industry, and academia designed for systemic resilience and directed technological breakthrough. This is a structural advantage, not just a policy. https://t.co/eBcZLzFqxd

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The 2017 AI Development Plan is more than a blueprint This is a market signal and a coordination mechanism. By setting explicit national goals for 2030, it de-risks private sector investment and aligns Research and Development across entities, reducing the inefficiencies of fragmented competition.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This creates powerful synergies: 🔸Academia focuses on applied research with clear commercial pathways. 🔸Private Giants (BAT, Huawei) leverage vast user data and capital to scale innovations. 🔸State provides policy stability, infrastructure, and anchors demand via public projects.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The analytical error in viewing export controls as a permanent bottleneck is the assumption of a static technological landscape. China's response demonstrates dynamic adaptation: constraints are catalyzing a parallel, indigenous innovation ecosystem. https://t.co/qZmAE8xOwB

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

In semiconductors, the strategy is multi-layered: 🔸Near-term: Maximize the capabilities of existing and acquired equipment through advanced techniques like multi-patterning to achieve higher-node (e.g., 7nm) production. 🔸Medium-term: Onshore production of critical machinery [e.g., domestic Deep Ultraviolet (DUV) lithography] 🔸Long-term: Breakthrough in next-generation tech [e.g., Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV)]

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This is not merely substitution; it's the forced creation of a fully integrated supply chain. The trial of a Chinese DUV lithography tool by SMIC is a critical inflection point. While yields may initially lag, it represents a move towards technological sovereignty. https://t.co/BtpjXgHaHj

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Market projections reflect this systemic shift The 30%+ Compound Annual Growth Rate for China's AI chip market isn't just growth; it's the financial quantification of this decoupling. Capital is flowing into domestic designers (Biren, Cambricon) and manufacturers (SMIC, YMTC) at an accelerating rate.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The "AI Plus" initiative is a masterstroke in creating a demand-side ecosystem By integrating AI into manufacturing, logistics, and urban management, China creates a closed-loop system: domestic demand fuels domestic innovation, which improves domestic supply, fostering further innovation.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: The West is playing a game of checkers, focusing on removing key pieces. China is playing a game of Go, strategically building interconnected systems for long-term positional dominance. https://t.co/caprktT7HK

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The outcome of the AI race The outcome of the AI race will be determined by whose innovation ecosystem is more resilient and adaptive. Current evidence suggests China has architected its system for precisely this scenario. https://t.co/1PCRx9ip0A

Saved - September 18, 2025 at 7:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The NATO Military Bank represents a troubling shift towards perpetual war financing, creating a debt trap for smaller NATO states that erodes their fiscal sovereignty. It socializes risks for arms manufacturers, ensuring profits regardless of performance and undermining market efficiency. The initiative promotes forced interoperability, stifling Europe’s defense independence. Centralized capital influxes may worsen inflation in the military sector. Led by former military figures, it reflects the militarist lobby's power, prioritizing financialization over genuine security, with a grim outlook for accountability.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🏦🪖The NATO Military Bank: The Globalists' War Fund is Here The globalists are building their final piece of financial infrastructure for perpetual war. Forget the World Bank. Forget the IMF. Meet the "NATO Bank", the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank. Here's how it works🧵

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Core Function 1 - Sovereign Lending: This mechanism will not alleviate debt but enshrine it. It creates a perpetual debt trap for smaller NATO states, locking their national security into loan repayments to a financial entity they do not control, eroding fiscal sovereignty. https://t.co/8BkdunP3xm

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Core Function 2 - Risk Mitigation: Socializing the risk for private arms manufacturers is a disastrous moral hazard. It guarantees profits for the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) regardless of performance, using public funds to underwrite private gain, eliminating any market incentive for efficiency or cost-control.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Strategic Objective - Forced Interoperability: In practice, this will mean the standardization of procurement around primarily US and UK systems. It is a financial tool to crush what remains of Europe's independent defense industry, creating dependency, not alliance cohesion. https://t.co/mXX9TNdBSG

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Economic Objective - Countering Inflation: The idea that a massive, centralized influx of capital into a supply-constrained sector will lower prices is economically naive. It is far more likely to overheat the industry, creating bottlenecks and inflating costs further, making the problem worse.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Architects & Governance: The initiative is not led by current NATO officials but by a network of former high-ranking alliance military & intelligence figures (e.g., Murray, Peach, Geoană). This suggests a hybrid model: officially multilateral but heavily influenced by a specific policy bloc.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Lobbying & Integration: Its swift inclusion in EU policy documents is not a sign of merit, but of the overwhelming power of the militarist lobby. Critical debate is being bypassed in a panic-driven rush to fund a new Cold War, with no exit strategy. https://t.co/lEJMbLe8vR

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The "City of London" Nexus Basing it in the world's premier capital of financialization is a telling choice. It signals that the primary output of this project will not be security, but complex financial instruments, securitized debt, and derivatives tied to conflict—a grim prospect.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

World Bank for War This is an admission of failure. The World Bank's model is plagued by corruption, mission creep, and often crippling debt for recipient nations. Applying this flawed model to war preparation is a recipe for a vast, unaccountable black hole of spending. https://t.co/cYdJ8ZslEu

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Implication - Financialization of Security: This is the most dystopian outcome. It permanently hardwires the profit motive into the architecture of collective security. The financial and military elite now have a vested, monetary interest in perpetual tension, not in peace. https://t.co/7RG9tAdA1R

Saved - September 15, 2025 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia's drone swarms represent a transformative shift in warfare, operating as a cohesive unit rather than individual drones. The increase from 43 to over 800 drones in a single strike highlights a new military strategy focused on overwhelming enemy defenses through mass rather than precision. Tactics now include swarming, advanced decoys, and complex routing to complicate defensive measures. The threat extends beyond Ukraine, exposing NATO's vulnerabilities and potentially disrupting European air infrastructure, with significant economic repercussions. This advancement alters the regional security landscape dramatically.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺 Russia's drone swarms have arrived. And they change everything It's not just about quantity. It's a new form of warfare. Russia's drone empire doesn't operate as individual units but as a single, terrifying organism. Here's how it works and why it's a game changer 🧵 https://t.co/e3C8fqEozB

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Data Point: The evolution from 43 drones in a single strike to over 800 in one night is not merely quantitative. It represents a fundamental shift in military capacity, enabling new tactics centered on saturation and attrition of enemy defenses. https://t.co/voti2Zn3hI

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Core Objective: The primary military utility of these one-way attack drones (OWA-UAVs) is not precision but mass. They are used to overwhelm sophisticated, expensive Western air defense systems (like Patriots or IRIS-T) through sheer volume, creating cost-exchange ratios highly favorable to Russia.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Tactical Innovation: Russia has moved beyond simple numbers. Tactics now integrate: 🔸Swarms & Waves: To complicate defensive sequencing. 🔸Advanced Decoys: Inexpensive plywood/foam drones that are radar-indistinguishable, forcing defenders to engage false targets. 🔸Complex Routing: Avoiding predictable paths to bypass field-based defenses.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Strategic Extension Beyond Ukraine: Regardless of whether Russia was responsible for the recent incursions into Polish and Romanian airspace, Europe and NATO demonstrated their aerial vulnerability. Russia has proven a key reality: The physics of drone swarms do not respect political borders. NATO's eastern flank is inherently exposed to spillover.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The European Airport Vulnerability: The threat to European air infrastructure is not necessarily about physical destruction but systemic disruption. Modern aviation is a fragile, high-velocity system intolerant of uncertainty. https://t.co/TLvylL7W2d

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Precedent: The 2018 Gatwick incident, where sightings of a drone (never confirmed to be hostile) triggered a 36-hour shutdown, proved that even the perception of a drone threat forces automatic safety closures. The cost was £50M. The weapon is the risk of disruption. https://t.co/IGASuzVJ1i

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Projected Economic Impact: Let's use the Frankfurt Airport (FRA) as a model 🔸Daily Capacity: ~1,100 flights, ~170,000 passengers. 🔸EU261 Regulation: Mandates €600+ compensation per passenger for cancellations. 🔸Direct Cost Calculation: 24h closure = ~170,000 passengers x €600 = €102 million in compensation alone. 🔸Secondary Costs: Aircraft & crew displacement, cascading network delays, reputational damage, and increased insurance premiums.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Asymmetric Advantage for Russia: A limited drone incursion, even with decoys, near a major transport hub could: 🔸Paralyze a critical node of EU logistics. 🔸Inflict economic damage wildly disproportionate to the cost of the drone raid. 🔸Strain NATO's collective response mechanisms in a grey-zone scenario.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: Russia's drone advancement is a strategic game-changer. It provides a tool for conventional battlefield dominance in Ukraine and a potent instrument for indirect coercion against Europe. The ability to potentially hold economic infrastructure at risk with cheap, scalable technology alters the regional security calculus significantly.

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on how Russia could disrupt Europe with minimal repercussions. Their use of drones for surveillance and potential infrastructure shutdowns poses a significant threat, especially to major air hubs. These inexpensive drones create disproportionate crises, making NATO's costly defense strategies seem ineffective. The alliance struggles with its outdated response mechanisms, leaving it vulnerable. Each drone incident stirs public panic, and NATO faces a dilemma: respond and incur massive costs or ignore the threat and appear weak. Russia's strategy effectively exposes NATO's limitations while remaining below the threshold of war.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇪🇺How Can Russia Wreak Havoc Around Europe With Zero Consequences? Russian drones have breached Polish airspace in a large-scale surveillance operation. But what if Russia expands such operations across Europe? Here's why NATO and Europe wouldn't stand a chance👇🏻🧵 https://t.co/GTKNOoDcMx

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Target: Europe's Economic Arteries. 🔸The goal isn't just to fly over fields. It's to force the shutdown of critical infrastructure. Major air hubs like Warsaw, Berlin, or Frankfurt are incredibly vulnerable. 🔸A single drone sighting can halt all flights, causing massive economic disruption.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Method: Cheap, Scalable Provocation. Russia doesn't need expensive missiles. Mass-produced drones like the Geran-2 (cost: ~$10k) are the perfect tool. They are low-altitude, slow, and hard to detect, but their real power is in creating a disproportionate crisis. https://t.co/mkbExx5po2

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Cost-Benefit Analysis is Overwhelmingly in Russia's Favor: 🔸Deploying F-35 jets ($80M+ per unit) and Patriot missile batteries ($1B+ per system) to intercept cheap drones is financially unsustainable. 🔸Each interception costs NATO far more than it costs Russia to launch the threat.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Exploiting NATO's Structural Inefficiency: NATO's Air Policing doctrine is built for traditional aircraft, not swarms of low-flying UAVs. The requirement to scramble expensive fighter jets for every incursion is a systemic vulnerability that Russia is effectively exploiting. https://t.co/QEDjeg40WH

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

What is the consequence? 🔸Article 5 is designed for an armed attack, not a drone nuisance. New sanctions? The resource is exhausted. Military retaliation? Too escalatory. 🔸NATO's political toolkit for this gray-zone warfare is effectively empty. https://t.co/hPnxkKEx6M

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Psychological & Social Impact: European populations are unprepared for the reality of aerial disruptions. Unlike in Russia, where airlines and passengers have adapted, each drone incident in Europe triggers media hysteria and public alarm, magnifying the perceived impact far beyond the physical threat.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

NATO's Lose-Lose Dilemma: 🔸Option 1: Ignore the drones. This makes NATO look weak and invites further escalation. 🔸Option 2: Respond. This means scrambling $80M F-35s to shoot down a $10k drone—a massive financial and operational loss. Russia wins either way. https://t.co/r4GuRM4VMn

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Sum of All Fears: A Campaign. Now imagine this not as a one-off event, but a sustained campaign. Regular, simultaneous incursions into Polish, Baltic, and German airspace. The economic and logistical chaos would be immense, and NATO would have no effective counter-play. https://t.co/Dxt29QeOL0

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: The Perfect Strategy. Russia has found a way to project power, demonstrate capability, inflict economic pain, and expose NATO's weakness—all while remaining below the threshold of war. The response is limited to whining and looking powerless because, in this new game, the traditional rules don't apply.

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 2:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
China has developed a sophisticated strategy to deter economic coercion through resilience and strategic positioning. This multi-layered approach includes deterrence by denial, entanglement, and punishment. By minimizing vulnerabilities, fostering global interdependence, and demonstrating a credible willingness to respond to economic threats, China signals that attacks will be costly and ineffective. The emphasis on domestic preparedness enhances national unity and stability during disputes. Ultimately, China's model illustrates that economic security is integral to national security in the modern era.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇨🇳How China Wins the Economic Long Game In an era of increasing economic warfare, China has developed a sophisticated and effective system to deter economic coercion from third parties. This is about resilience and strategic positioning. Look at the playbook🧵 https://t.co/nJYFQUjOaD

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

China's strategy isn't one-dimensional. It's a multi-layered shield combining three powerful approaches: 🔸Denial: Making attacks futile. 🔸Entanglement: Making attacks too costly. 🔸Punishment: Promising a firm response. Credibility is the foundation of all three. https://t.co/O9fTe96vdB

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

1️⃣ Deterrence by Denial: Building Resilience. China focuses on minimizing vulnerabilities. This involves securing critical supply chains, advancing self-reliance in key technologies (like semiconductors), and diversifying production geographically into its hinterland. https://t.co/gKdvri7Inq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

THE GOAL: To signal to any potential adversary that an economic attack will not achieve its desired objectives due to China's strong internal economic foundations and capacity to withstand external shocks. https://t.co/6ksL2C9Dge

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

2️⃣ Deterrence by Entanglement: Strategic Interdependence. As a global manufacturing and supply chain hub, China is deeply integrated into the world economy. This creates mutual dependencies that make economic aggression costly for the attacker as well. https://t.co/FEgfXv0Dqb

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

China strategically fosters connections where third countries and companies depend on its market for exports or its production for critical inputs. This creates a powerful gravitational field that naturally discourages confrontational economic measures. https://t.co/E5Yc2Fszgz

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

3️⃣ Deterrence by Punishment: A Credible Toolbox. China has demonstrated a clear willingness to impose calibrated costs in response to perceived economic attacks. The key here is credibility, built through a track record of measured responses. https://t.co/gW9LSKhKxA

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Examples include the swift implementation of export controls on Rare Earth Elements during recent trade escalations. This demonstrated China's ability and will to leverage its strategic advantages promptly and effectively when necessary. https://t.co/vw7GTbeg2x

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Credibility is the Foundation. China's record, from responses to the EU's EV tariffs to past actions, leaves little doubt that it will use its economic tools if its red lines are crossed. This perceived willingness is a powerful deterrent in itself. https://t.co/FHVOukom32

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Population Preparedness. Domestic communications reinforce national economic resilience and unity. A population prepared to endure potential short-term costs strengthens the overall deterrent effect by ensuring social stability during economic disputes. https://t.co/UZQqq0qOpj

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: China's approach is a masterclass in comprehensive national power. It moves beyond isolation to smart integration, building resilience from within while leveraging global interconnectedness to ensure stability and deter coercion. https://t.co/2tzZXC7YgO

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

LESSON FOR WORLD: In the 21st century, economic security is national security. It requires a strategic, credible, and holistic approach to deterrence, much of which China has already institutionalized. https://t.co/Dz9qetIhtu

View Full Interactive Feed