reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @NicHulscher

Saved - June 7, 2026 at 7:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alleging the CDC is being sued under federal law for running an illegal 72-dose childhood vaccination program without ever testing cumulative safety or filing required safety reports. The lawsuit claims violations of the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment due process and bodily integrity, and the Administrative Procedure Act for arbitrary, capricious rulemaking—potentially dismantling the regime.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

CDC SLAMMED WITH FEDERAL LAWSUIT FOR OPERATING ILLEGAL 72-DOSE CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM NEVER tested for cumulative safety. NEVER filed the legally-required safety reports. This lawsuit could DISMANTLE the CDC’s unlawful vaccine regime that has poisoned the nation.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The lawsuit charges the CDC with violating the First Amendment (silencing dissenting doctors), the Fifth Amendment (due process & bodily integrity), and the Administrative Procedure Act (arbitrary and capricious rulemaking): https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-cdc-sued-for-pushing-illegal

Saved - May 31, 2026 at 12:24 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Google is preparing to release 64 MILLION bacteria-infected mosquitoes into the wild. We’re on the wrong timeline again... https://t.co/UmmG34NWGl

@JonMFleetwood - Jon Fleetwood

Google to Release 64 Million Bacteria-Infected Mosquitoes Across California and Florida Over the Next Two Years EPA accepting public comments through June 5. https://t.co/vU14tsL3wn

Saved - May 28, 2026 at 12:09 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Tick-borne alpha-gal syndrome skyrocketed 10,000% as Bill Gates spent $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. The FBI must investigate all possible bioterror-related activities behind this MAJOR surge in tick-induced meat allergies. https://t.co/Synhq5wrji

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

JOE ROGAN: “The tick thing is nuts...” TIM BURCHETT: “Because of Bill Gates.” ROGAN: “Farmers and ranchers are finding boxes of ticks on their property. I have a good friend who got bit by the Lone Star tick and has that alpha-gal problem... It makes your body allergic to red meat.” BURCHETT: “And who has got genetically made meat now?” ROGAN: "Bill Gates?" BURCHETT: "Bill Gates."

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates has already spent more than $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. In 2023, the Gates Foundation awarded Flyttr the cash to “initiate development of a self-limiting tick” designed to spread and control cattle ticks. https://t.co/92U29bnbPu

Saved - May 25, 2026 at 5:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see alarm in “350 million people” across three countries and multiple datasets: U.S. SEER shows a +6.4% early-onset cancer surge since 2021; U.S. CDC WONDER shows about 138,000 excess cancer deaths since 2021; South Korea reports higher risks of six major cancers for vaccinated people; Italy reports higher risks of three major cancers. I call for criminal prosecution.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

350 MILLION PEOPLE. THREE countries. FOUR independent datasets.... COVID SHOTS UNLEASHED A TURBO CANCER EPIDEMIC 🇺🇸 U.S. GOVERNMENT SEER CANCER DATA: +6.4% early-onset cancer surge since 2021 🇺🇸 U.S. CDC WONDER MORTALITY DATA: 138,000 excess cancer deaths since 2021 🇰🇷 SOUTH KOREA VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY: Vaccinated individuals face higher risks of 6 major cancers. 🇮🇹 ITALY VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY: Vaccinated individuals face higher risks of 3 major cancers. It's time for those responsible to face CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The global population will unfortunately pay the price for years to come thanks to Pfizer, Moderna, and world governments: 🇺🇸 U.S. SEER: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-us-government-cancer-data 🇺🇸 CDC WONDER: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2026/03/13/the-state-of-things-pandemic/ 🇰🇷 SOUTH KOREA: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12465339/ 🇮🇹 ITALY: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12381369/ https://t.co/4q7k7H9PIX

Saved - May 21, 2026 at 5:10 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

JOE ROGAN: “The tick thing is nuts...” TIM BURCHETT: “Because of Bill Gates.” ROGAN: “Farmers and ranchers are finding boxes of ticks on their property. I have a good friend who got bit by the Lone Star tick and has that alpha-gal problem... It makes your body allergic to red meat.” BURCHETT: “And who has got genetically made meat now?” ROGAN: "Bill Gates?" BURCHETT: "Bill Gates."

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates has already spent more than $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. In 2023, the Gates Foundation awarded Flyttr the cash to “initiate development of a self-limiting tick” designed to spread and control cattle ticks. https://t.co/DaZ8KojrjD

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

PEER-REVIEWED PAPER SAYS GENETICALLY ENGINEERING TICKS TO SPREAD MEAT ALLERGIES IS “MORALLY OBLIGATORY” Western Michigan professors claim that CRISPR-edited ticks should be used to spread alpha-gal syndrome as “moral bioenhancement” to FORCE humans away from eating meat. This https://t.co/ooKiwMYHXz

Saved - May 21, 2026 at 3:46 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

ORACLE'S LARRY ELLISON: “Citizens will be on their best behavior” with AI surveillance systems "We're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on." "It's unimpeachable." Welcome to the dystopian AI surveillance state. https://t.co/1Hh2y0ToYm

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

REMINDER: The White House announced “The Stargate Project” where Larry Ellison pushed "personalized" AI mRNA cancer shots developed within 48 hours. MAHA was already infiltrated by mRNA transhumanists on Day 2 of the Trump Administration. https://t.co/5apTaZtzSD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker proposes a future approach to cancer treatment: designing a vaccine for each individual person to vaccinate them against their specific cancer. They say this personalized mRNA vaccine could be produced robotically using AI in about 48 hours. The concept includes early cancer detection, followed by developing a cancer vaccine tailored to the person’s particular cancer, with the vaccine becoming available within 48 hours. The speaker frames this as the promise of AI and the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And you can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically, again using AI, in about forty eight hours. So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in forty eight hours. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.

@Docjohnc - BeyondBio / John Catanzaro

‼️The Genetic Gamble‼️ The next generation of medicine is being sold as “precision healthcare” — personalized mRNA vaccines, self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), DNA therapeutics, programmable lipid nanoparticles, and AI-designed nucleotide constructs. But beneath the marketing

Saved - May 16, 2026 at 12:12 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨CDC Data Suggests mRNA Shots SEVERELY Harm Future Generations Years after mass vaccination of childbearing women, babies born are now dying at a 77% excess rate. This is a catastrophic generational crisis — one that was expected with experimental gene transfer technology.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: CDC Child Death Records Indicate CATASTROPHIC Transgenerational Harm of Mass mRNA "Vaccination" A new analysis of CDC data by @EthicalSkeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a 77% excess rate ⬇️ 📈30-year decline in infant/child mortality reversed in 2021 ⚠️Transgenerational effect: sustained excess mortality in children never infected or injected ⚠️Teratogenic signal: deaths rose among infants exposed in utero ⚠️17,975 excess deaths (ages 0–4) since rollout ⚠️ Excess death causes align closely with those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting the same mechanisms may now carry across generations. The implications extend FAR beyond the current generation. If validated, this would represent a public health crisis of historic magnitude—one not only for those who took the injections, but for the children and grandchildren who never consented to the risks.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

🚨Those children born of past-vaccination mothers, despite never having been vaccinated themselves, and despite never having had Covid... are dying now at 77% excess - a 24 sigma event.

Saved - May 12, 2026 at 11:15 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Official documents confirm that FDA officials knew in 2021 that COVID shots were linked to SUDDEN DEATHS yet chose to COVER IT UP. CRIMINAL actions by our top public health regulators have resulted in MILLIONS of deaths, injuries, and permanent disabilities. https://t.co/DdJNTCwhaj

Saved - May 11, 2026 at 6:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that vaccinated children showed 54% higher cancer rates in the largest vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated birth cohort study, and a post cites President Trump opposing universal vaccine mandates. I also note a peer‑reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort claiming vaccinated children are sicker across 22 chronic disease categories in the same discussion.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We found vaccinated children suffered 54% HIGHER CANCER RATES in the LARGEST vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted. https://t.co/8xFcqZPJbX

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP DROPS TRUTH: We need to STOP pumping babies full of endless vaccines “I believe in vaccines, but I don't believe that you have to have a mandate for all of them... I look at these beautiful little babies, and they get a vat — like a big glass of stuff — pumped into their bodies, and I think it's a very negative thing!” @RapidResponse47 Important for MAHA 🇺🇸

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses a nuanced view on vaccines, stating a belief in their importance while opposing mandatory vaccination for all vaccines. They highlight the polio vaccine as amazing and credited with wiping out the disease, illustrating support for vaccines in general but not for compulsory mandates. They point out that there are about 88 vaccines, suggesting that some could be cut back or administered in smaller quantities. The speaker contrasts the high number with examples from other countries, noting Denmark and others have significantly fewer vaccines (12, 14, or up to 17). They emphasize their own preference for reducing the vaccine load. A vivid image is used: babies receiving “a vat” or “a big glass of stuff pumped into their bodies,” which the speaker characterizes as a negative thing. This leads to the expressed desire for a different approach, namely much smaller shots and fewer visits to the doctor. The speaker proposes that with fewer vaccinations and fewer medical visits, outcomes could be improved. They specifically mention four doctor visits as a desired target, implying that this reduction could lead to better health results. Finally, the speaker links this approach to autism, stating the belief that the proposed changes—smaller shots and fewer visits—would yield a much better result with autism. The remarks indicate a direct connection between the vaccination approach described and autism outcomes, presented as a conclusion of their viewpoint. Overall, the transcript captures a stance that supports vaccines in principle and acknowledges their success (polio), but argues against mandatory universal vaccination and for a substantially reduced vaccine schedule and medical visits, with an asserted positive impact on autism outcomes. The speaker compares U.S. vaccination totals to those of Denmark and other countries to underscore the perceived excess, advocating for smaller, fewer-dose regimens administered over fewer clinical visits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe in vaccines, but I don't believe that, you know, you have to have a mandate for all of them. The polio vaccine's amazing. It's, you know, wiped it out. And I believe in vaccines, but, you know, I think we're up to 88 vaccines. And I really feel that vaccines, if they were given in smaller quantities, they wanna cut some out and that's good too. And I agree with that. 82 is so many. If you look at Denmark and other countries, you have twelve, fourteen, I think 17. And we have, like, 82. But I look at these beautiful little babies and they get a vat. I mean, so like a big glass of of stuff pumped into their bodies. And I think it's a very negative thing to do. And I would like to see it. I'm not doing this in terms of Bobby or not. I hope they agree with that, but that's just my opinion. I would love to see much smaller shots, like four visits to the doctor. And I think you would have a much better result with the autism.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across All 22 Chronic Disease Categories: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/125 https://t.co/Chz4WdXYQm

Saved - May 10, 2026 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a study found only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” in the early pandemic were real, meaning 86% were not; and that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on fraudulent testing, with calls to prosecute those who used fake tests.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY FINDS 86% OF PCR-POSITIVE “COVID CASES” WERE NOT REAL INFECTIONS Vaccine mandates, fear campaigns, and lockdowns were built on a FRAUDULENT testing illusion. Time to prosecute those who used fake tests to manufacture panic, destroy livelihoods, and force gene therapy.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

New study finds that during the early pandemic period, only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real — proving that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-86-of-pcr-positive-covid

Saved - May 7, 2026 at 4:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that the US Army ran a clinical trial with an Andes hantavirus DNA gene-therapy injection—the same strain linked to the cruise ship outbreak—with 98% adverse events and the DNA plasmid created at Fort Detrick BSL-4. The referenced post claims 13 hantavirus vaccines/gene therapies (6 DNA, 3 mRNA, 2 viral vectors, 1 inactivated, 1 protein). I will NOT take any of them. I will NOT take this gene therapy under any circumstances.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The US Army already ran a clinical trial with an Andes strain hantavirus DNA gene-therapy injection — the exact same strain behind the cruise ship outbreak. 98% of participants suffered adverse events. The DNA plasmid was created at the Fort Detrick BSL-4 army lab. https://t.co/XzEOQVTg33

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

VACCINE CARTEL AND US ARMY ARE DEVELOPING 13 HANTAVIRUS VACCINES & GENE THERAPIES 6 DNA "vaccines" (US Army) 3 mRNA "vaccines" (Moderna, China, Canada) 2 viral vector "vaccines" (UK, Canada) 1 inactivated (licensed in Korea) 1 protein subunit I will NOT be taking any of them

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

You’ll never guess who has been working on an mRNA hantavirus vaccine…

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

I will NOT take this gene therapy under any circumstances. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/229/1/30/7209758

Saved - May 5, 2026 at 2:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FAUCI CAUGHT ON TAPE: "When you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological BS and they get VACCINATED." "You want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get VACCINATED." ONE WEEK LEFT TO PROSECUTE HIM. The decision should be EASY. https://t.co/mPZPSY28Ps

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history. He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough. RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

Saved - April 29, 2026 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that FDA officials hid safety signals for COVID-19 vaccine injuries—sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, clots, neurological damage, and dementia. The senior FDA medical officer who uncovered them was ordered to “cease and desist,” and her improved VAERS analysis system was shut down. FDA leadership called the work a major distraction, burying the findings and blocking a clearer warning signal.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FDA officials COVERED UP 25 COVID shot safety signals, including SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH, HEART ATTACKS, BLOOD CLOTS, NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, and DEMENTIA. The senior FDA medical officer who uncovered them was ordered to “CEASE AND DESIST.” FDA leadership called her work a “major distraction.” Dr. Ana Szarfman developed a superior VAERS analysis system that fixed “masking”… but they SHUT HER DOWN and BURIED IT.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

Today, I released a report showing that Biden health officials knew that safety signals for COVID-19 injection injuries were being hidden by their VAERS analytic algorithm. They were shown an updated algorithm that signaled serious adverse events, but they refused to use it. Their cover-up jeopardized the health of millions of Americans. Read my interim report and see the records here:

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FDA’s own data flagged sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological damage, and dementia… and the FDA analyst uncovering it was ordered to “cease and desist.” https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-senate-investigation-finds-f15

Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a 1950s CIA-classified study showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth, buried for over 50 years and delaying vital research. The linked largest human ivermectin/mebendazole cancer study shows 84.4% cancer disappearance, tumor shrinkage, or stabilization. Declassified study.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The CIA CLASSIFIED a 1950s study showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth—and kept it BURIED for over HALF A CENTURY. Millions of cancer victims have paid the price as this vital line of research was set back DECADES. https://t.co/GFAf6LVNds

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The single LARGEST human study of ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients found that the VAST MAJORITY (84.4%) declared CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or CANCER STABILIZATION. https://t.co/PvxcTzMURU

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🔥Dr. John Campbell SHOCKED after reading our ivermectin cancer study: “We could be CURING, potentially … your wife’s cancer, your husband’s cancer, your mother’s cancer, your father’s cancer, your son’s cancer, your daughter’s cancer, with ivermectin and mebendazole.” https://t.co/QfY65Hxire

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 1:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that farmed fish you eat are routinely sedated and mass vaccinated with over 50 vaccines. Hundreds of millions of salmon, trout, and sea bass are injected with automated vaccination machines or immersed in vaccine baths each year. mRNA versions are coming soon.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The farmed fish you eat are routinely sedated and mass vaccinated using over 50 different vaccines. HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of salmon, trout, and sea bass are injected with automated vaccination machines or immersed in vaccine baths every year. mRNA versions are coming soon... https://t.co/ZXhR6unAox

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 12:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that the largest COVID vaccine autopsy study says 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot, with three independent estimates of 470,000–840,000 U.S. mRNA deaths—more than WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq combined—and a call for an FDA Class I recall. A Systematic Review lists: Florida extrapolation 470K, VAERS-adjusted 600K, and CDC data up to 900K.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The LARGEST COVID "vaccine" autopsy study EVER conducted found 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot. THREE independent estimates yield 470,000–840,000 U.S. mRNA deaths — more than WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq COMBINED. An FDA Class I Recall is MANDATORY. https://t.co/3W7QYRdx1k

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ Florida Surgeon General Study Extrapolation (470K mRNA deaths): https://thefocalpoints.com/p/pfizer-mrna-shots-alone-likely-killed VAERS-Adjusted Mortality Estimate (600K mRNA deaths): https://thefocalpoints.com/p/covid-19-vaccines-likely-killed-more CDC Mortality Data Analysis (now up to 900K mRNA deaths): https://theethicalskeptic.com/2026/03/13/the-state-of-things-pandemic/

Saved - April 6, 2026 at 11:21 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨VACCINATED CHILDREN ARE FAR SICKER ACROSS ALL 22 CHRONIC DISEASES IN THE LARGEST VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY EVER CONDUCTED 1. Cancer: 📈 +54% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children: 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Our peer-reviewed reanalysis of the landmark Henry Ford study found 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Our Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across ALL 22 Chronic Disease Categories Reanalysis of the LARGEST U.S. vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted reveals 54% higher CANCER rates and 549% higher AUTISM-related disorders among vaccinated children. Our independent proportional-incidence reanalysis and peer-review of the Henry Ford birth cohort study (Lamerato et al.) — revealed at the U.S. Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025 — examined 18,468 children (16,511 vaccinated with a median of 18 doses and 1,957 completely unvaccinated) and found the following ⬇️ ⚠️All 22 chronic disease categories were more common in vaccinated children. 🧩Conditions which collectively form the clinical profile associated with autism spectrum disorder — including autism itself, ADHD, developmental delay, speech disorder, learning disability, neurological impairment, and related diagnoses — occurred at 5.49-fold (549%) higher odds in vaccinated children. 🎗️Childhood cancer occurred 54% more often in vaccinated children. 📈By age 10, 57% of vaccinated children had developed at least one chronic disease, compared to only 17% of unvaccinated children. We used proportional-incidence analysis because many conditions had zero or near-zero cases in the unvaccinated group — a well-known “zero-cell” problem that makes odds-ratio modeling mathematically incapable of detecting true differences. This method reveals the large disparities the original authors’ statistics hid. Proportional increases we calculated for all 22 chronic conditions: 1. Any chronic condition: 3.50x higher (+250%) 2. Asthma: 6.53x higher (+553%) 3. Atopic disease: 4.86x higher (+386%) 4. Autoimmune disease: 12.2x higher (+1120%) 5. Brain dysfunction: Present only in vaccinated 6. Cancer: 1.54x higher (+54%) 7. Diabetes: Present only in vaccinated 8. Food allergy: 2.28x higher (+128%) 9. Mental health disorder: 7.96x higher (+696%) 10. Neurodevelopmental disorder (umbrella): 13.54x higher (+1254%) 11. ADHD: Present only in vaccinated 12. Autism: 2.8x higher (+180%) 13. Behavioral disability: Present only in vaccinated 14. Developmental delay: 5.12x higher (+412%) 15. Learning disability: Present only in vaccinated 16. Intellectual disability: Present only in vaccinated 17. Speech disorder: 9.03x higher (+803%) 19. Motor disability: 9.1x higher (+810%) 19. Tics: Present only in vaccinated 20. Other psychological disability: Present only in vaccinated 21. Neurological disorder: 1.26x higher (+26%) 22. Seizure disorder: 3.16x higher (+216%) We calculated that the current CDC childhood immunization schedule now contains at least 81 doses of vaccines by age 18 — more than four times higher than the median exposure in the Henry Ford cohort. This means that the dramatic disparities we uncovered in this dataset emerge even at a fraction of the full CDC schedule. This is one of the clearest population-level datasets EVER produced demonstrating that the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule is a MAJOR driver of chronic disease, neurodevelopmental injury, and early-life morbidity.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical

Saved - March 31, 2026 at 8:04 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

ORACLE'S LARRY ELLISON: “Citizens will be on their best behavior” with AI surveillance systems "We're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on." Welcome to the dystopian AI surveillance state. https://t.co/ZhF7caJADB

Saved - March 31, 2026 at 12:56 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨CDC data shows HUNDREDS of deaths among infants and toddlers within days of MMR vaccination — from SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, CARDIAC ARREST, AND ENCEPHALITIS. Our study found MMR and MMRV vaccines have been linked to 2,657% MORE DEATHS than measles itself since 1995. https://t.co/tXvexg8hcs

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995 We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️ Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database. Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago. Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified: 📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination 📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States Among those 299 U.S. reports: 📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2 📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window 📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination 📍40.1% occurred within 7 days 📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines 📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%). The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination. Since 1995 in the United States: 💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS 🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era. Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher. In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 48 hours, MMR vaccine uptake may face TOTAL COLLAPSE. No parent wants to inject their baby with a DEADLY product. Public health agencies should have listened to grieving parents — and conducted this study years ago. Now they’ll have to scramble for damage control. https://t.co/8J9jtriZGO

Saved - March 20, 2026 at 7:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that lemongrass and dandelion root are claimed to selectively destroy human cancer cells in vitro and reduce tumor growth in mice by ~95% with zero harm to healthy cells, urging immediate clinical trials for colon and lymphoma cancers.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BOTH lemongrass and dandelion root selectively destroy human cancer cells in the lab and suppress human tumor growth in mice by ~95% — with ZERO harm to healthy cells. Common, non-toxic plants shown to HALT tumor growth in animal models deserve IMMEDIATE clinical trials. https://t.co/GievlZCNxM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Dandelion Root Extract Cuts Human Colon Tumor Growth in Mice by ~95% Without Toxicity: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/dandelion-root-extract-kills-95-of Lemongrass Extract Cuts Human Lymphoma Tumor Growth in Mice by ~95% Without Toxicity: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/lemongrass-extract-cuts-human-lymphoma https://t.co/FGXq9n4iwr

Saved - March 19, 2026 at 6:47 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨COMPLETE REMISSIONS of Stage IV cancers using anti-parasitics are now being documented in the peer-reviewed literature. HUNDREDS of studies find ivermectin and fenbendazole exert over 12 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types. https://t.co/6wjJYrYWgy

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/E1VSzjTlkE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shares a story about three friends who previously had stage four cancer but are not cancer-free now. He notes that what they took included ivermectin and fenbendazole, repeating fenbendazole for emphasis. He mentions they also drank something described as hydrochloride something or other, and points to studies that indicate people have proven they’ve been drinking methylene blue and similar substances. He explains methylene blue is a fabric dye, originally a text-style dye, and adds that it has profound effects on mitochondria. He asserts, “This stuff works, man.” He then observes that there are a lot of substances that do work, which he finds strange. He attributes this strangeness to profit, suggesting that when people hear about things that are demonized and then turn out to be effective, it raises questions about why those treatments are not promoted. He asks how medical institutions have failed, implying that cures exist but are not promoted because they are not profitable. The overall narrative contrasts hopeful anecdotal outcomes with a critique of consensus and financial incentives in the medical establishment, highlighting the tension between what works and what is promoted within mainstream medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you a good story. Okay. I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all, and they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. That's Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on that now where people have proven that they've drinking methylene blue and stuff like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Yeah. Yeah. It was a text style dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?
Saved - March 17, 2026 at 11:39 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: ALL major artificial intelligence systems — SuperGrok, ChatGPT-5, and Google Gemini — independently concluded that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM after analyzing our landmark 82-page study. The 30-year lie that “vaccines don’t cause autism” has officially been TERMINATED.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.” “There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented. “We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.” But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up. In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately. “It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Saved - March 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Mel Gibson isn't lying... A recent study documented COMPLETE REMISSION of Stage IV cancers using fenbendazole. Patients with advanced melanoma, breast, and prostate cancer saw their tumors disappear — without chemotherapy. Clinical trials must be launched immediately. https://t.co/f1J0Ot7crt

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/Flk7b6qBFW

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 7:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a peer-reviewed study claims mRNA vaccines are gene-altering, reprogramming human gene expression across systems. It cites persistent proteomic changes months post-injection and signals of genomic integration in tumor DNA, suggesting possible genome editing. The authors warn the platform’s use beyond COVID, including cancer, influenza, RSV, personalized therapies, and self-amplifying RNA, and call for an immediate suspension with surveillance.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies We found mRNA gene-transfer shots fundamentally REPROGRAM human gene expression across multiple biological systems — warranting IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION of the ENTIRE mRNA platform. Our newly published peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons presents compelling evidence that mRNA vaccines operate through a gene-altering mechanism of action — fundamentally reprogramming human biology: (1) Transcriptomic Reprogramming: mRNA injections alter how human genes are switched on and off across critical cellular systems controlling metabolism, protein regulation, and stress responses. (2) Persistent Proteomic Alterations: Hundreds of circulating proteins remain altered for months after injection, demonstrating prolonged systemic biological effects. (3) Genomic Integration Signals: Multi-omic molecular analysis detected a host–vector chimeric sequence involving vaccine genetic material within human tumor DNA — suggesting a possible genomic integration event. This means the issue is no longer limited to COVID shots. The same mRNA platform is rapidly being deployed for: • cancer injections • influenza injections • RSV injections • personalized mRNA therapeutics • self-amplifying RNA platforms This dangerous gene-transfer platform was rolled out to BILLIONS of people without molecular surveillance, genomic monitoring, or biological circuit breakers capable of stopping aberrant gene expression. Immediate and comprehensive suspension of mRNA injections for human use is therefore required. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @AAPSonline

Saved - March 5, 2026 at 1:54 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters https://t.co/OP3FcwPLXW

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 9:31 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Living Near a Cell Tower Linked to White Blood Cell Elevation Comparable to SMOKING 24% of residents living within 60 meters of a tower had abnormally high immune cell counts and over 50% of heavy phone users suffered the same — a signal of BIOLOGICAL STRESS. Researchers didn’t rely on surveys or symptoms. They drew blood, measured radiofrequency exposure inside participants’ homes, and analyzed complete immune cell profiles. The findings were striking: ⚠️RF exposure from nearby towers predicted elevated monocytes — a key inflammatory white blood cell — at levels comparable to smoking. ⚠️Nearly 1 in 4 residents near towers had immune markers above clinical limits ⚠️More than half of heavy mobile phone users (4–6 hrs/day) showed the same abnormal immune signal ⚠️The majority affected were under 30 years old White blood cells rise when the body detects stress from toxins, inflammation, or environmental exposures. When these immune markers cross clinical limits, it signals the body is reacting. As the authors concluded: “These results indicate human biological systems are under stress from both mobile phone use and local mobile phone tower exposures.”

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - February 27, 2026 at 8:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I list vaccines that were pulled: Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955) after 10 deaths; Swine Flu Vaccine (1976) after 20-50 deaths; RotaShield Vaccine (1999) after 10-15 bowel obstructions; Chikungunya Vaccine (2025) after 3 deaths; COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026) 500,000+ deaths.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955): PULLED after 10 deaths. Swine Flu Vaccine (1976): PULLED after 20-50 deaths. RotaShield Vaccine (1999): PULLED after 10-15 cases of bowel obstruction. Chikungunya Vaccine (2025): PULLED after 3 deaths. COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026): 500,000+ deaths.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nick, what does the Maha crew need to do and what do the people need to be demanding? First, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does the Maha crew need to do, and what do the people need to be demanding, Nick? Well, first, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:02 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates and Epstein began planning pandemics in 2011. 2011–2017: Emails/texts between Gates and Epstein discuss pandemic simulations and vaccine funding structures. 2019: Event 201 co-hosted by Gates Foundation simulates a global coronavirus pandemic weeks before COVID. https://t.co/3XVicCUFNy

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Beyond horrific. 2011: Bill Gates and Epstein began planning the Pandemic 2015: Gates partners with the WHO, World Bank, MSF and the UN 2017: Simulations are treated as a Business Model 2019: Covid Pandemic Simulation occurs which later happens with astonishing accuracy… https://t.co/qB5mA7bZCw

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 10:49 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995 We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️ Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database. Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago. Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified: 📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination 📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States Among those 299 U.S. reports: 📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2 📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window 📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination 📍40.1% occurred within 7 days 📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines 📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%). The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination. Since 1995 in the United States: 💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS 🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era. Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher. In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 48 hours, MMR vaccine uptake may face TOTAL COLLAPSE. No parent wants to inject their baby with a DEADLY product. Public health agencies should have listened to grieving parents — and conducted this study years ago. Now they’ll have to scramble for damage control.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We have just uncovered data that could result in the END of the MMR vaccine. Stay tuned.

Saved - February 14, 2026 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that states are declaring public health emergencies over infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA vaccine adverse events. I see CDC data allegedly showing babies dying at >50% excess years after mass vaccination of childbearing women. I am told genomic transfer of vaccine material to babies is claimed, causing deadly consequences. The 30-year decline supposedly collapsed in 2021 after the mRNA campaign, signaling a transgenerational crisis.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

States have begun declaring public health emergencies over skyrocketing infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA “vaccine” fatal adverse events. CDC data shows babies born are now dying at a >50% excess rate — YEARS after mass vaccination of childbearing women. Genomic integration in mothers likely transfers Pfizer/Moderna genetic material into the baby, resulting in deadly consequences. The 30-year decline in infant mortality collapsed in 2021, immediately following the mRNA injection campaign. A transgenerational crisis is here — children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are just now identifying signals of transgenerational harm. So I'm not talking about transgender anymore. I'm talking about through generations. Right? So what's happened now is according to CDC data, if you look at it, starting right after the mass vaccination of childbearing age women in early twenty twenty one, there's a statistically significant inflection point. Right? So infant mortality rates are steadily going down for thirty years. 2021 hits mass vaccination. Boom. It shoots right up. It hasn't gone down since. It's 2025. That's the death of babies. Babies. Yeah. And and babies so babies in 2025 are now dying at seventy seven percent excess. Even Mississippi just declared a state of emergency over it. Really? Wait. Tell talk about Mother's aren't taking the shots anymore. No, they're not. It appears some of this genetic material appears to integrate into their body, possibly passed off. So it's it's a legacy effect probably. Most people took the shots in 2021. That's that's my concern is that how there could be effects through the generations.
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 2:42 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A recent study found glyphosate causes 10+ cancers in rats at “safe” doses. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD. https://t.co/pVMonvCxus

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a controversial 2000 study and its alleged connections to Monsanto. The speaker asserts that Monsanto staff helped write the article, and that the authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto. They claim much of the data in the study was unpublished, describing it as secret data from Monsanto, and label the paper “basically a complete fraud.” The study supposedly claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The speaker then references subsequent studies released recently, which purportedly found that glyphosate increased or caused ten distinct types of cancer in rats when the rats were exposed at so-called safe levels. Despite these findings, the speaker notes that the original paper was used by agencies around the world to claim glyphosate was safe and to support approval processes. The speaker concludes that the entire foundation of those safety assurances was built on “a complete fraud and lie,” and states that the retraction of the 2000 paper is, in this context, something they are happy about, remarking that it is probably the only time they will be happy about a retraction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This study was published in the year 2000, and now it was revealed that actually Monsanto staff helped write this article. The authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto, and many of the data in this study was unpublished, the secret data from Monsanto. So it was basically a complete fraud and it claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The and now we have all these studies that came out recently finding that glyphosate increase or caused 10 distinct types of cancer in rats when they're exposed at so called safe levels. And so this paper though was used by our agencies across the world to claim glyphosate was safe and in the approval processes. And so now all of that was built on a complete fraud and lie. And so this retraction is probably the only time I will be happy about a retraction.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Department of Health just found that your favorite bread is laced with carcinogenic glyphosate. https://t.co/YwK0mDESLd

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:46 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots. And we also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well. Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well. And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely. We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods. For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body. Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories. The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date. A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression. Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary: 40+ ER visits 200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines) 100+ lab investigations 100+ imaging/functional studies Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded. SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out: 🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories. 🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens. 📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination). Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed: 📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities. 📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA. 📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation. 📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative. 📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure. Serial skin biopsies demonstrated: 📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent. 📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent. 📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen. 📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways. Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility. Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04. This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways. Yes, we were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 36 hours, irrefutable molecular evidence will be released with major global implications. 200+ specialist evaluations across 18 medical disciplines 100+ advanced laboratory investigations 100+ imaging /functional diagnostic studies 70+ alternative diagnoses ruled out https://t.co/6JcAzsEWGd

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:54 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Why Some People Are Not Harmed by COVID-19 "Vaccination" Some batches cause mass injury and death. Others are harmless duds. 🔥 Hot lots: DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, heavy metals 🧊 Dud lots: Degraded. Inactive. Multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm: batch determines fate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's now four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. We're actually the early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. And, yes, some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events. Some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Since batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 mRNA injections has been demonstrated, checking your batch can be a useful tool to help predict possible long-term adverse events: https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html https://t.co/SEUq1CvHxw

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

The Safety of COVID-19 'Vaccines' is Batch-Dependent Epidemiologist @NicHulscher explains with @chriswerge Full Episode: https://youtu.be/zx0I8ku81tI?si=C2z7l3Ixkr9s87VT #MFScholar

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study ever conducted found that vaccine mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein can persist in humans for at least 3.5 YEARS — independently confirmed across multiple labs, biospecimens, and time points using multiple methods. https://t.co/odfaKuHTgK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes what he claims is the strongest case report ever done on vaccine injury, specifically mRNA vaccine injury. The subject is a 51-year-old man who developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, and skin disturbances, constituting multisystem long vaccine syndrome. The key findings are said to be detected 3.6 years after his last shot. Exosomes circulating in his body allegedly contain Pfizer mRNA, and this mRNA is still present in those exosomes years after vaccination. The same mRNA is reportedly also found in his skin. In addition, plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process is claimed to be present in his skin, again 3.6 years after vaccination. Specifically, the plasmid DNA allegedly includes the SV40 segment, the spike expression cassette, and the open reading frame region, with all components of the plasmids in the Grover's disease–affected skin area. Microscopic analysis of the Grover’s disease area allegedly showed staining for SARS-CoV-2 spike or vaccine spike, indicating the presence of spike protein in that skin region. This staining for spike protein is reported as occurring 3.6 years after the shot. Overall, the speaker asserts that all vaccine components—mRNA, plasmid DNA with defined segments, and spike protein—remain in the body for multiple years, with findings in exosomes and skin indicating long-lasting presence. The speaker also asserts that this represents a situation in which “we were completely lied to.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's probably the strongest case report, ever done on vaccine injury, mRNA vaccine injury. So what we found was in an individual, 51 year old man, he developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, skin disturbances. So he has multisystem long vaccine syndrome. We found three point six years after his last shot circulating Pfizer mRNA in what's called his exosomes. These kind of bubbles circulate around the body, act as as kind of messengers. So the mRNA is still in there. Pfizer mRNA as well as in his skin. You won't even believe it. We found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process. Again, three point six years after literally just placed in his skin. It was the s v 40 segment of it. It was the spike expression cassette of it and it was the open reading frame region. So all components of the plasmas were in his skin in what's called the Grover's disease area where he developed the skin disease from the shot. And then we looked microscopically inside of this Grover's disease area, and we literally stained it for SARS CoV two spike or vaccine spike, and we found it. It's stained. Third, 3.6 after his shot, he still has spike protein in his skin. And so we found all these vaccine components, it appears they last for multiple years, and we were completely lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

x.com/i/article/2018…

Article Cover

STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years

For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body.

Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories.

The resulting paper, titled Unprecedented" target="_blank">https://zenodo.org/records/18460099">Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date — involving >40 emergency department visits, >200 specialist encounters across 18 medical disciplines, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and serial blood and tissue sampling performed at multiple timepoints over more than 3.5 years.

The findings reveal longitudinal molecular evidence that vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein can persist in human blood and tissue more than 3.5 years after vaccination — independently confirmed across multiple laboratories using diverse analytical methods.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively excluded: nucleocapsid antibodies remained negative across five separate timepoints and three independent laboratories, and nucleocapsid protein was absent in tissue specimens despite the presence of spike protein deposition.

Article image

Case Presentation

We report a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and subsequently developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction consistent with post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), involving cardiopulmonary, neurologic, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, autonomic, otolaryngologic, audiovestibular, immune, ophthalmic, dermatologic, and psychiatric domains. Clinical manifestations included: pulmonary emboli; delayed MRI-confirmed myocarditis; neurocognitive impairment; small fiber neuropathy; autonomic dysfunction; myalgia; chronic pancreatic and gastrointestinal involvement; worsened tinnitus with sensorineural hearing loss; voice dysphagia and dysphonia; ophthalmic disturbances; chronic dermatologic inflammation; and anxiety/depression. The case was evaluated through a uniquely extensive longitudinal, multi-domain clinical investigation spanning molecular, immunologic, genetic, proteomic, transcriptomic, and tissue-based analyses, undertaken to characterize disease mechanisms and exclude alternative etiologies.

Article image

Extensive Diagnostic Evaluation

After >40 emergency department visits and >200 outpatient specialty encounters, the patient underwent >100 non-routine laboratory investigations and >100 imaging/functional studies. This evaluation systematically excluded underlying etiologic mechanisms across infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular/vascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic domains. Testing remained largely nondiagnostic. A possible undocumented/undiagnosed asymptomatic infection manifesting as Long COVID was suspected after myocarditis diagnosis, and serology was pursued; unexpected results prompted expanded immune and tissue-based testing for spike- and vaccine-derived components. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were negative across five separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by three independent laboratories. The patient remains nucleocapsid negative with persistently elevated spike antibody levels (4,553 U/mL) 1,433 days after the final vaccination.

Specimen Collection and Analytical Methods

Blood and skin tissue specimens were obtained at multiple time points between 852–1,364 days after the final Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Biological compartments analyzed included plasma, circulating exosomes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and skin tissue. Specimens were evaluated across multiple independent laboratories using diverse analytical methodologies, including ELISA, automated immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, standard PCR with Sanger sequencing confirmation, whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomic profiling, and quantitative mass spectrometry.

Article image

Persistent Circulating Spike Protein and Vaccine-Derived mRNA

At 852 days post-vaccination, blood-based immune testing identified detectable SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein within classical and non-classical monocyte subsets with associated cytokine and immune marker abnormalities.

At 1,173 days post-vaccination, high-sensitivity ELISA detected free Wuhan spike protein in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) and in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL).

At 1,284 days, RT-PCR identified vaccine-derived spike mRNA within circulating exosomes, whereas PBMC RNA remained negative following DNase-treated extraction and amplicon-specific PCR targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3).

Serologic profiling at 1,173 and 1,284 days post-vaccination demonstrated persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL and 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL, respectively), consistent with ongoing antigenic stimulation and an immune-tolerance–skewed response.

Article image

Persistent Spike Protein and Plasmid DNA in Skin Tissue

Serial skin biopsies at 1,160, 1,249, and 1,364 days post-vaccination, all from truncal skin within areas of clinically active Grover’s disease, were nucleocapsid negative and demonstrated persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial cells and macrophages by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation. Spike protein was also found in nerve fibers at 1,364 days.

The 1,364-day skin biopsy contained multiple plasmid DNA elements, including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and the SV40 enhancer, confirming durable retention of vaccine-derived DNA in somatic tissue by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.

Article image

Multi-Omic Analysis

Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways.

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility.

Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04.

Conclusion

This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. The convergence of these observations across longitudinal blood and tissue sampling provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine-derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in vivo for years following administration.

In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways.

These data challenge prevailing assumptions regarding rapid degradation and short-lived biological activity of mRNA vaccine components and underscore the need for controlled longitudinal studies to determine prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of persistent vaccine-derived material.

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 12:38 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Bill Gates was planning “Pandemic Simulations” with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017. You can’t make this up. https://t.co/kCLyFNssbo

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speakers acknowledge that they did not simulate or practice the current situation. - They note this work is being done on behalf of their partners at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. - They indicate that the efforts span both health policies and economic policies. - They describe the current environment as uncharted territory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now here we are. You know, we we didn't simulate this. We didn't practice. On behalf of our partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in unchartered territory.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:56 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump recently signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/BLHJweg3E0

Video Transcript AI Summary
By around 2030, the smartphone as we know it today will not be the usual kind of the most common interface; many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About six gs earlier, which is around 2,030. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, how concerned should we be about five gs towers, do think? I'm very concerned about it. So, like nine, ten? Calling it five gs is actually a misnomer because that doesn't have to do with five gs does not tell you what's wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths and some of them are very bad. And in Europe, the regulations are order of magnitude lower than what we allow here. But there are literally over 10,000 studies that just document a number of ill effects, including cancer, tumor growth,

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - January 19, 2026 at 1:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I assert our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the largest vaxxed vs unvaxxed study shows vaccinated children are far sicker across all 22 chronic diseases, with increases like Neurodevelopmental disorders +1254%, Autoimmune +1120%, Motor +810%, and 15–22—disorders like ADHD, Diabetes, and Learning disability—observed only in vaccinated kids. Bottom line: 22/22 chronic conditions worse in vaccinated children; zero in unvaccinated. The CDC’s schedule drives these epidemics.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the LARGEST vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study in HISTORY shows vaccinated children are FAR sicker across ALL 22 chronic diseases: 1. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Cancer: 📈 +54% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children (ZERO cases in unvaccinated): 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Bottom line: 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were worse in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions. The CDC’s hyper-vaccination schedule is driving the modern epidemics of chronic disease and autism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what we did was we looked at the raw numbers, right? So the original study, they did so much modeling, like statistical models, and we really didn't see just the raw proportions between the groups. When we looked at the raw proportions, it was every single, all 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated. All 22 including cancer. Really? Because I mean, they said in the study it kind of uses cancer as the control, saying there was no difference in cancer, and you're saying there was a difference in cancer. Yes, so when it comes to rare outcomes, the modeling they use, you know, it's not very reliable, and so they didn't do any basic proportional analysis, but when we did that and we looked, cancer was fifty four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. So they had fifty four percent more cases and, you know, this is explained biologically. There is biological plausibility behind it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.” If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate? But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just curious. You see What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. Speaker 2: What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell. Speaker 3: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Speaker 1: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems I've looked at a lot of studies. There's three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 4: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 3: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 4: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 5: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune disease, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders What Speaker 1: kind of numbers are we talking about? Do you remember? Speaker 4: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 3: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and, you know, immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 3: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk. Speaker 4: For example, there were two hundred and sixty two children who had ADHD in the Speaker 5: vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
Saved - January 18, 2026 at 9:25 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Yes, our study concluded that the current H5N1 bird flu outbreak likely originated from the USDA Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory—and not a single U.S. government agency has challenged our findings. https://t.co/iDlxjUHp8t

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Bird Flu Was Created In A US Research Lab Using Gain Of Function... “Current H5N1 strain is man-made from USDA gain-of-function serial passage research in Athens, Georgia...extended to waterfowl, cattle, mammals!” — Dr. Peter McCullough, MD https://t.co/O7zhmfhRbR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Cardcaine, an epidemiologist from the University of Michigan, is identified as the person who broke the story in February about a bird flu outbreak linked to the USDA research lab. He states that mainstream media are not reporting on this development. He also asserts that Peter Hotez will not tell the public about this information. According to the speaker, the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak was created in a lab through serial passage conducted in a U.S. government laboratory. The claim specifies that this lab-driven process enabled the virus to jump from traditional chickens to migratory waterfowl. From there, the outbreak purportedly spread to cows, marking a transition from poultry to other species in the ecosystem. The narrative presented emphasizes that the origin and progression of the outbreak are laboratory-generated, rather than arising solely from natural spillover events. The speaker highlights that the virus was manipulated via serial passage in a government lab, a technique used to adapt pathogens to new hosts or improve transmissibility. The sequence described claims a progression: initial adaptation in poultry, transmission to migratory waterfowl, and subsequent appearance in cattle. The speaker underscores two supplementary points: first, that major media outlets have not reported on this angle of the outbreak; second, that a well-known public figure in the field, Peter Hotez, is portrayed as someone who would supposedly not disclose this information. The overall message portrays a narrative of concealment and laboratory involvement in the emergence and spread of the bird flu across species, culminating in its presence in cows. In summary, the speaker attributes the outbreak to deliberate laboratory manipulation via serial passage in a U.S. government facility, tracing a path from chickens to migratory waterfowl and then to cows, while accusing mainstream media of omission and suggesting that Peter Hotez would not disclose these details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cardcaine epidemiologist from University of Michigan. He's the one who broke the story on this clague February, this bird flu that came out of the USDA research lab. You know, the mainstream media is not reporting on this and Peter Hotez will never tell you this, but the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak is created in a lab through serial passage in a US government lab. It got it to spread from traditional chicken into migratory waterfowl, and now it's into the cows. Incredible, incredible.
Saved - January 17, 2026 at 10:10 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Over 70% of humanity received a neurotoxic COVID shot now linked to 146 serious brain, spinal cord, and psychiatric adverse events. This explains the widespread collapse of common sense, deterioration of cognitive function, and drastic personality distortions seen since 2020. https://t.co/fX02G6zBz5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. So what this study does is it confirms our suspicions and observations of the past five years that common sense has completely deteriorated, from the minds of the population. And so what this study did was they looked at the VAERS system back from the nineties and all the way up till 2024, and they looked at what's called PRRs, proportional reporting ratios. What this is is how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. And what they found was absolutely disturbing. 8686 safety signals of these neuropsychiatric adverse events. Some of them up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. And we have to remember the CDC FDA safety signal is defined for PRRs as greater than two. Well, all of these were greater than two and this includes schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, psychosis. So people are are hallucinating and and and so it's clearly damaging the brain. This is such a large number of safety signals and and it also confirms what would of a study that came out two weeks ago where people who had strokes, they looked inside their brains and they found they are in fact producing this toxic spike protein for up to seventeen months in their brain after these shots. And so that probably explains why we see this deterioration in cognitive function.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Have you observed a change in the personalities of your vaccinated friends or family members since they received their injections? "There is a strong association between Covid-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders." "Psychosis, 440 times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, 315 times."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you noticed your friends or family who are vaccinated actually have a whole different personality or are more angry, just overall different since getting the injections? Well, there is a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders. Let's jump in. So this comes directly from the FDA and the CDC, and I'm gonna leave the link to the study in the comments, of course, but these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over. And so you'll see that all these things I'm about to list off are a more likely determination. So these are times as well. So psychosis, four forty times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, three fifteen times. Suicidal thoughts,
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 3:14 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Ongoing CYBERATTACKS are preventing access to the largest COVID-19 "vaccine" cancer study EVER conducted. The systematic review documents 300+ peer-reviewed COVID shot turbo cancer cases across 27 countries. ~50% of the cancers occurred within 2–4 weeks of injection.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 reports that the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal. They say the article was hit with cyberattacks just before publication, preventing online posting, and that the FBI was contacted. The piece then appeared in PubMed, but is described as having gone down again after another cyberattack on the journal. The core findings, as claimed, are that the researchers collected all of the cancer evidence associated with the COVID shots and found over three hundred confirmed vaccine-related cancer cases documented in peer-reviewed literature. This number is described as not representing the total seen in real-world data, but rather the count of cases identified by scientists within peer-reviewed sources, thereby supporting the claim that the phenomenon is real. The cancers span every type imaginable, with lymphoma accounting for about forty percent of the cases. Two large population-level studies are highlighted, totaling about ten million people. These studies reportedly show a major increased risk of multiple cancers in vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated populations, with up to seven types of cancers increased. A military dataset consisting of around 1.2 million people is cited, in which lymphoma was reported to have increased drastically in 2021 among military members who were mandated to receive the shots. The summary characterizes the paper as so damning that it is presented as evidence that these shots are carcinogenic, and attributes the cyberattacks and other online disruptions to efforts to suppress these findings. The speaker emphasizes the sequence of cyber warfare activity around publication, the breadth of cancer types reported, and the notable increases in cancer incidence in large vaccinated populations, including a significant rise in lymphoma within the military cohort.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal, and they got hit with cyberattacks by positive yeah. Yeah. They got hit with cyber attacks just before they published it, so they couldn't put it online. And, the FBI was contacted, by the way. And so it got up into PubMed. And what they found was oh, by the way, now it's down again. The journal's been hit with another cyber attack. Wow. Yep. So this but the the I just wanna say what they found. They collected all of the cancer evidence of the COVID shots. And they found over three hundred confirmed vaccine turbo cancer cases documented in the peer reviewed literature. So that's that's not like the number that we see on the real world. That's just the number of, you know, scientists that collected these cases and found them. So we know it's real, and it spans every single type of cancer you could think of lymphoma was like forty percent of the cases. So it is doing that. But what's most shocking is there are two population large scale population studies, totaling now about ten million people where they do find, you know, a major increased risks of multiple cancers up seven types of cancers are increased in the vaccinated populations compared to the unvaccinated. And there was a military data set in there 1,200,000 people, I believe some type of lymphoma was increased drastically in 2021. The military members that were mandated to take these shots, these certain types of cancers skyrocketed. And so this paper is so damning that, you know, we know for sure that these shots are carcinogenic, and so that's why they're getting hit with, illegal, cyber warfare activities.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

JUST IN - Reported cyberattack takes oncology journal offline that published a peer-reviewed study from Tufts and Brown University exploring links of COVID injections to newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened cancer shortly after COVID injections. https://www.disclose.tv/id/63ece33cuo/

Study linking mRNA injections and cancer 'censored' by cyberattack Breaking news from around the world. disclose.tv
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:00 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Landmark Study of an ENTIRE COUNTRY (n=51 Million) Confirms COVID Shots Induced VAIDS in EVERY Age Group Vaccinated Koreans suffered a dose-dependent rise in the common cold, upper-respiratory infections, pneumonia, and tuberculosis — up to +559%. Kids were hit hardest.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a nationwide study conducted in South Korea, stating that every resident was included in the research. The study compared individuals who received the vaccine to those who did not, and the analysis was stratified by dose number (one dose, two doses, three doses, and four or more doses). A central claim of the speaker is that this study provides the strongest signal to date supporting vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, referred to as VADES. According to the speaker, as each dose was administered, the immune function of individuals declined. By the time of the fourth dose, the speaker asserts there was a significant increase in the risk of other infections, quantified as about a 550% increase, including infections such as the common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. The speaker notes that the effect was most pronounced in young people, specifically ages zero to nineteen, who reportedly had the highest risks of these other infections. The implication presented is that the injections are causing immune collapse and exhausting T cells, leading to immune dysregulation described as IgG4 class switching. The immune system is said to become dysfunctional as a result. Additionally, the speaker mentions that, consistent with other studies they reference, genes related to immune function are claimed to become shut down. The overall assertion is that these findings point to a troubling pattern of immune impairment associated with multiple vaccine doses, culminating in the claimed immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to other infections. The speaker emphasizes the magnitude and reliability of the sample size, stating that having an entire country’s population as the study cohort constitutes the strongest possible sample size. The summary of the presented claims centers on dose-dependent immune decline, a marked increase in non-target infections after the fourth dose, greater impact on children, evidence of immune system exhaustion and dysregulation, and purported genetic downregulation of immune pathways, all described as arising from the vaccination regimen in this nationwide South Korean study.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You couldn't get a stronger study than this. Every single resident in South Korea was in this study. Every single one. And so what do they do in this study? Well, they, again, compared who got the vaccine. They compared and compared it to who didn't, and they stratified by dose number. But the shocking thing about this study is, before we dig into it, is this is a the strongest signal that we have to date that vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is real or what's called VADES. So what happened in this study was as as each dose was incurred among these South Koreans, so they get one dose, two dose, three dose, four plus doses, each time they got another dose, their immune function dropped off. And they got up to they suffered when you reached the fourth dose, you started to suffer about 550 increased risks of other infections, common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. It's it was an absolute travesty. And you know who was affected the most? Was young children, ages zero to 19. They had the highest risks of these other infections. So what's happening is these injections are causing immune collapse. They're exhausting the T cells. They're causing immune dysregulation, what's called IgG four class switching. The immune system literally becomes dysfunctional. And as our other studies indicated, genes related to immune function literally become shut down. And so this is very disturbing. And, again, you can't get a stronger sample size than an entire country.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559% Landmark study of the ENTIRE South Korean population reveals a VAIDS signal — a dose-dependent rise in the common cold, upper-respiratory infections, pneumonia, and tuberculosis among the vaccinated. Those that received 4+ COVID shots suffered: 📈Common Cold ↑ +559% (children 0–19) 📈Upper-Respiratory Infections ↑ +83% (children 0–19) 📈Pneumonia ↑ +91% (COVID-negative group) 📈Tuberculosis ↑ +35% (COVID-positive group) Even after adjusting for age, sex, income, comorbidities, prior infection, and time since vaccination, the dose-response trend remained linear and unmistakable. These findings point to immune exhaustion, IgG4 dominance, and secondary immunodeficiency following repeated mRNA exposure — consistent with vaccine-acquired immune dysregulation (VAIDS). Apparent reductions in Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) and Pertussis are almost certainly statistical artifacts driven by healthy-user bias, diagnostic-coding overlap, and case misclassification. Crucially, the study’s national ARIMAX time-series revealed a 46-fold surge in confirmed pertussis cases across Korea during 2023, directly contradicting any notion of real-world protection. Because the “control” group included single-dose recipients, the true increase relative to the completely unvaccinated population is likely even greater than reported. Across an entire national dataset, each additional COVID-19 “vaccine” dose corresponded to a higher probability of non-COVID respiratory infection — most severely among children. This study reveals that COVID-19 “vaccines” have eroded immune function across an entire country — and likely the entire globe.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨VAIDS Explains Why EIGHT Studies Show mRNA Booster Shots Dramatically increase Infection Risk 1️⃣Dorr et al - Study of 1,745 healthcare workers finds mRNA boosters raise risk of influenza-like illness (flu, COVID, other viruses) by up to 70% and increase workdays lost by 50%. https://t.co/pyobkRdx6m

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 5:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize our peer‑reviewed re‑analysis of the largest vaxxed vs unvaxxed birth cohort: vaccinated children are sicker across all 22 chronic diseases. Increases: 1254%, 180%, 54%, 1120%, 810%, 803%, 696%, 553%, 412%, 386%, 216%, 128%, 26%, 250%. Observed only in vaccinated: ADHD, Diabetes, Brain dysfunction, Behavioral, Learning, Intellectual disability, Tics, Other psychological. Bottom line: 22/22 worse in vaccinated. CDC’s 81‑dose schedule linked.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the LARGEST vaxxed vs. unvaxxed birth cohort study in HISTORY shows vaccinated children are FAR sicker across ALL 22 chronic diseases. 1. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Cancer: 📈 +54% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children (ZERO cases in unvaccinated): 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Bottom line: 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were worse in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions. The CDC’s 81-dose hyper-vaccination schedule is driving the modern epidemics of chronic disease and autism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the original study relied heavily on statistical modeling, rather than presenting basic raw proportions. When they examined the raw proportions, they found that every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. The speaker notes that the study claimed there was no difference in cancer, treating cancer as a control, but asserts there was a difference in cancer when looking at raw data. They claim that for rare outcomes, the modeling used in the study is not very reliable, and no basic proportional analysis was performed by the original authors. However, when they conducted such an analysis themselves, they found cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. The speaker concludes that there is biological plausibility behind these findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what we did was we looked at the raw numbers, right? So the original study, they did so much modeling, like statistical models, and we really didn't see just the raw proportions between the groups. When we looked at the raw proportions, it was every single, all 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated. All 22 including cancer. Really? Because I mean, they said in the study it kind of uses cancer as the control, saying there was no difference in cancer, and you're saying there was a difference in cancer. Yes, so when it comes to rare outcomes, the modeling they use, you know, it's not very reliable, and so they didn't do any basic proportional analysis, but when we did that and we looked, cancer was fifty four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. So they had fifty four percent more cases and, you know, this is explained biologically. There is biological plausibility behind it.

@stopvaccinating - Larry Cook

Vax vs Unvax studies gives us answers that pediatricians, vaccine makers and mainstream media abhor: The unvaccinated children are healthier in every possible way. This is why these psychopaths want every child force vaccinated - to make this signal go away. https://t.co/v56mR2XdYR

Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:55 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨STUDY: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Cell Phone Radiation More Than TRIPLES Risk of Neurodevelopmental Delays in Infants Babies in high-EMF homes were up to 3.7× more likely to suffer motor, problem-solving & social delays. Imagine what 6G will do.

Video Transcript AI Summary
They literally went into the rooms. They went into these babies' rooms, in over 50 households. They literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. That accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi-Fi. All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. So this wasn't because they were born too early. They accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was they literally went in the rooms. Right? They went in these babies' rooms, like, over 50 households. Right? And they literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. Right? And so that accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi Fi. Right? All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high m EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. Right? So this wasn't because they were born too early. Right? They they accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It wasn't because of that. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump just signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/m2z0YVTiyF

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

Read this carefully. The federal government openly states that 6G will enable AI, robotics, and implantable technologies tied directly to national security and economic policy. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s policy. Ask yourself: Who controls the network and who becomes the node?

Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nic Hulscher claimed flu shots are a “DISASTROUS FAILURE” that raise dementia by 38% and Alzheimer's by 50%, citing a 13.3 million-person study and claims of a decade-long risk, plus a Cleveland Clinic finding of −27% flu vaccine effectiveness for 2024–25. He shared links to articles titled: “Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia/Alzheimer’s” and “Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu.”

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Flu shots are a DISASTROUS FAILURE — they increase your risk of dementia (+38%), Alzheimer's (+50%), AND the flu (+27%). The single LARGEST vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) found common vaccines dose-dependently increase risk of dementia and Alzheimer's for a FULL DECADE. A major Cleveland Clinic study (n=53,402) found −27% flu shot effectiveness during 2024–25 flu season.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript reports that the largest single study on vaccines and dementia, involving over thirteen million people, found that vaccinated adults who received flu shots and pneumococcal shots faced a 50% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease and a 38% increased risk of dementia. It is claimed that the risk increased the more doses participants received, with individuals who lined up to receive more flu shots over the years experiencing the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and that the risk persisted for more than ten years. The narrative states that once a person receives many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia, and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. Additionally, the transcript asserts that not only does the flu shot not work, according to colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic, but flu shots increase the risk of flu by 27%. It concludes by saying that flu shots, in addition to increasing flu risk, appear to increase the risk of dementia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The largest single study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia with over thirteen million people in it found that vaccinated adults who got flu shots and pneumococcal shots, they faced a fifty percent increased risk of Alzheimer's and a thirty eight percent increased risk of dementia. And the risk increased the more doses they got. So they started to get more flu shots that they lined up every year to get it. Unfortunately, they faced the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and the risk persisted for over ten years. And so it it appears, you know, once you receive so many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. So not only now do we know that the flu shot doesn't work according to and colleagues out of the Cleveland Clinic, flu shots increase your risk of flu by twenty seven percent. So not only do they do that, but now it appears that they increase your risk of dementia, which is absolutely terrible.

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

RFK Jr. warns: "In a million years, I would not take the flu shot - and I'll tell you why."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues against the flu shot, citing Cochrane and BMJ. He says: people who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu, but they’re four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. He contends that after vaccination you might get sick, not from flu but from something indistinguishable from flu, because the flu shot gives you pathogenic priming that injures your immune system and makes you more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. He references a Pentagon story, citing Wolfe (January), stating the flu shot not only primes for flu but primes for coronavirus. In the study, they had a placebo group and a vaccine group to test prophylaxis against coronavirus for military readiness, and they found people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus. He claims this is not an isolated finding, saying six other major studies report the same thing. Regarding longevity, he references Cochrane’s point about what has happened to longevity in the elderly since flu shot mandates began for elderly people, saying life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferation increased. He adds an observational note about the COVID vaccine period: “during the COVID crisis” there’s no science on this, but observationally, it tended to be people who got their flu shots—nursing home residents who receive flu shots and first responders who get flu shots are implicated. Speaker 1 interruptions: asks for clarification, saying, “with all due respect, I don’t understand the implications of your position. If you’re right, why wouldn’t it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it’s criminal.” Speaker 0 responds with a partial cut-off fragment, beginning to reply with “to” and then stopping.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a million years I would not take the flu shot and I'll tell you why, because this is what Cochrane and BMJ have found. People who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu. They're four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. And you might find, and a lot of people do, that they get the flu shot and then they get sick. They're usually not getting the flu, they're getting something that is indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the Pentagon published a story and you can cite this, it's by Wolfe, w o l f e, in January, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. If you get, they gave flu, they had a placebo group and they had a vaccine group because they wanted for many military readiness to see if the flu shot was prophylactic against coronavirus. What they found is actually the people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus and that's not a, that's not a lone study. We found six other major studies that say the same thing. If you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get coronavirus. You know, all you have to do, Alan, and this is what Cochrane said, is look what's happened to longevity in the elderly since we started mandating the flu shot to elderly people. Those are the people, life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferated. And if you see, you know, the people who died during the COVID vaccine, the COVID crisis, and there's no science on this, but it's observational, it tended to be people who got their flu shots, people who were in nursing home who will all get flu shots, people who are first responders who get flu So Speaker 1: with all due respect, I don't understand the implications of your position. If you're right, why wouldn't it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it's criminal Speaker 0: to

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s. https://thefocalpoints.com/p/study-common-vaccines-linked-to-38 STUDY: Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-flu-vaccination-linked

STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s The single largest vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) finds risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after flu and pneumococcal shots. thefocalpoints.com
NEW STUDY - Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu Major Cleveland Clinic study finds −26.9% effectiveness for influenza vaccine during the 2024–2025 respiratory viral season. thefocalpoints.com
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump just signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/m2z0YVTiyF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Six gs earlier, which is around 2030. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About six gs earlier, which is around 2,000 '30. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

Read this carefully. The federal government openly states that 6G will enable AI, robotics, and implantable technologies tied directly to national security and economic policy. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s policy. Ask yourself: Who controls the network and who becomes the node? https://t.co/MtlWFxHH5G

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 12:13 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Over 900 studies show vitamin D exhibits potent anti-cancer effects across MOST cancers. Wide-scale vitamin D supplementation could prevent 30,000 cancer deaths per year in a SINGLE country. Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable. https://t.co/5KxUNJ0Gb4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vitamin D alone could prevent about 30,000 cancer deaths in a single country in a single year. The study looked in Germany and examined what would happen if they administered wide-scale vitamin D to the 50 and older population. Based on the most recent meta-analyses of vitamin D and cancer, there is about a 13% reduction in cancer mortality, and that is extrapolated to an entire country, resulting in saving about 30,000 lives per year. A recent paper on vitamin D and cancer and its biological effects is highlighted: there are over 900 peer-reviewed recent papers finding that vitamin D, when raised to adequate levels, exhibits anticancer activity against literally basically every single cancer known, through vitamin D receptor signaling as well as tumor microenvironment control and immune modulation. This is described as very, very important as winter months approach, so ensuring adequate vitamin D intake is advised. The speaker notes that some of the most powerful cancer prevention tools are neither profitable nor novel, and vitamin D is very inexpensive, biologically active, and, according to randomized clinical trial evidence, saves lives at scale. The main question posed is why public health agencies are ignoring this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vitamin d alone could prevent thirty thousand cancer deaths in a single country in a single year. Specifically, this study looked in Germany. They looked at what would happen if they administered wide scale vitamin d to the 50 and older population. And based on the most recent meta analyses of vitamin d and cancer, does show about a thirteen percent reduction in cancer mortality. And so that is extrapolated to an entire country. You save about thirty thousand lives per year. And we also have to remember a recent paper came out looking at vitamin d and cancer and its biological effects. There's over 900 peer reviewed papers, recent peer reviewed papers, finding that vitamin d, when you raise it to adequate levels, exhibits anticancer activity against literally, basically every single cancer known through vitamin d receptor signaling as well as tumor microenvironment control and immune modulation. So this is very, very important as we reach the winter months. You want to ensure you have adequate vitamin d intake. Some of the most powerful cancer prevention tools are neither profitable nor novel, and vitamin d is very inexpensive, biologically active, and according to randomized clinical trial evidence, saves lives at scale. The main question now remains is why are public health agencies ignoring this?

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Vitamin D Could Prevent 30,000 Cancer Deaths Per Year in Germany Alone Over 900 studies show anti-cancer activity of vitamin D across most cancer types, and randomized controlled trials demonstrate a ~13% reduction in cancer mortality. Cancers with demonstrated benefit include: • Breast • Prostate • Colorectal • Lung • Brain (glioblastoma) • Melanoma • Ovarian • Bladder • Head & neck • Multiple myeloma Effects are mediated through vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment control. If adults aged 50+ received routine vitamin D supplementation at modest daily doses: ➡️ ~30,000 lives saved per year (Germany alone) ➡️ ~322,000 life-years gained annually ➡️ ~$280 million in net healthcare savings per year ➡️ Cost: ~$11–$55 per person annually Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable.

Saved - December 23, 2025 at 6:37 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Why Some People Are Not Harmed by COVID-19 "Vaccination" Some batches cause mass injury and death. Others are harmless duds. 🔥 Hot lots: DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, heavy metals 🧊 Dud lots: Degraded. Inactive. Multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm: batch determines fate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. The early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly. Thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's now four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. We're actually the early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. And, yes, some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events. Some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Since batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 mRNA injections has been demonstrated, checking your batch can be a useful tool to help predict possible long-term adverse events: https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html

Site not found · GitHub Pages knollfrank.github.io

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

The Safety of COVID-19 'Vaccines' is Batch-Dependent Epidemiologist @NicHulscher explains with @chriswerge Full Episode: https://youtu.be/zx0I8ku81tI?si=C2z7l3Ixkr9s87VT #MFScholar

Video Transcript AI Summary
These batches are different. So yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch. And you can check your batch at howbadismybatch.com, which uses the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many reports of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These batches are different. So Yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The the quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch, and you can check your batch at how bad is mybatch.com, which uses the vaccine adverse events reporting system, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many, how many reports of of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 9:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that vitamin D shows anti-cancer activity across most cancers. About 900 studies and trials show ~13% lower cancer mortality. Benefits include breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, brain glioblastoma, melanoma, ovarian, bladder, head & neck, and multiple myeloma, via VDR signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment. For adults 50+, modest daily supplementation could save ~30,000 German lives/year, gain ~322,000 life-years, and save ~$280M, at ~$11–$55/person/year.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Vitamin D Could Prevent 30,000 Cancer Deaths Per Year in Germany Alone Over 900 studies show anti-cancer activity of vitamin D across most cancer types, and randomized controlled trials demonstrate a ~13% reduction in cancer mortality. Cancers with demonstrated benefit include: • Breast • Prostate • Colorectal • Lung • Brain (glioblastoma) • Melanoma • Ovarian • Bladder • Head & neck • Multiple myeloma Effects are mediated through vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment control. If adults aged 50+ received routine vitamin D supplementation at modest daily doses: ➡️ ~30,000 lives saved per year (Germany alone) ➡️ ~322,000 life-years gained annually ➡️ ~$280 million in net healthcare savings per year ➡️ Cost: ~$11–$55 per person annually Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable.

Saved - December 16, 2025 at 9:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A 12-day, small study reports resveratrol plus copper in glioblastoma reduced tumor proliferation, chromatin debris, immune checkpoints, and cancer stemness, while reprogramming gene expression and promoting tumor death; larger RCTs are urged. An oncologist notes GBM's aggressiveness, potential to complement standard therapy, and explains mechanisms (pro-oxidant effects, cfChP degradation) and cautions on dosing; dietary sources and copper role are discussed; more trials needed.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨NEW STUDY: Resveratrol and Copper Trigger System-Level Collapse of Human Glioblastoma Aggressiveness in Just 12 Days In one of the deadliest human cancers, cheap nutraceuticals suppressed tumor growth, shut down 9 cancer hallmarks, and triggered tumor self-destruction⬇️ Human glioblastoma patients received resveratrol (5.6 mg) plus copper (560 ng) four times daily for an average of just ~12 days before tumor resection. Tumor tissue was then compared with untreated controls. They found: ✅Near-elimination of tumor-promoting chromatin debris (cfChPs) ✅A ~31% reduction in tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67) ✅Suppression of NINE core hallmarks of cancer ✅Simultaneous down-regulation of SIX immune checkpoints ✅Significant loss of cancer stem cell markers ✅Large-scale reprogramming of tumor gene expression ✅Activation of organized, intrinsic tumor cell death with efficient cleanup This is not a marginal signal. It's a coordinated, system‑level biological shift in one of the deadliest cancers known. Longer trials are urgently needed to determine whether prolonged treatment could improve clinical outcomes.

@DrHariOncoAI - Dr Harishankar | Surgery × AI

As an oncologist, this resveratrol-copper study for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is intriguing, potentially complementing standard therapies like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. GBM is highly aggressive, with median survival of 12-18 months and 5-year survival ~5%. This short pre-surgical trial shows biological promise, but larger RCTs are essential for clinical validation. - 🦀GBM's Deadliness: Rapidly invasive brain tumor spreading aggressively, resisting treatments, impacting cognition, mobility, and daily function. Early intervention and innovations critical, but standard care foundational. - ⚛️Resveratrol's Mechanism of Action: Antioxidant that scavenges free radicals; inhibits cell proliferation via cyclin blockade; induces apoptosis (programmed cell death); anti-inflammatory; anti-angiogenic (blocks tumor blood supply). With copper in GBM, acts as pro-oxidant, generating radicals to degrade cell-free chromatin particles (cfChPs), reducing proliferation and immune evasion. - Biochemical Properties: Stilbenoid polyphenol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene); it's actually the plant's defense against fungi; potent antioxidant/anti-inflammatory; activates sirtuins (type of protein involved in regulating cellular ageing and death of cells and their resistance to stress) for longevity. - 🍇Best Natural Sources: Red grapes, especially muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) over common (Vitis vinifera); also blueberries, cranberries, tangerines—consume handful daily for natural boost. - Part of Fruit with Highest Concentration: Skin (primary); seeds secondary—eat whole fruits (skin on) or via red wine (skin-fermented). - Boosting Absorption: Usually with minute dose of piperine (black pepper) to inhibit breakdown; fats (yogurt, olive oil) for uptake; nano-formulations or quercetin (onions/apples) for synergy. Consult doctor; high doses may cause GI issues. - Copper's Role in Cancer-Killing with Resveratrol: Essential mineral but tumor-exploited for growth; this combo flips to pro-oxidant, producing radicals to destroy cfChPs, downregulating cancer stemness and checkpoints. It's like converting ally to assassin; dosing data needed to prevent toxicity. - 🥦Dietary Sources of Copper: Shellfish (oysters), nuts/seeds (cashews, sunflower), liver, dark chocolate, whole grains, leafy greens—meets adult needs (~900 mcg/day) without supplements unless deficient; excess risks liver damage. - Need for Larger RCTs: Small, 12-day study is proof-of-concept; require big, long-term trials (hundreds of patients) for outcomes, safety, and chemo integration—don't abandon proven treatments; discuss nutraceuticals with oncologist.

@_Jonathan_Quick - John Quick

I just sat down with @Lexie_Official on Stories Worth Hearing. We talked about how she first got into music, the artists who shaped her sound, her creative process, and how she pulls from real-life stories and emotions when writing songs. We also talked about her new Christmas album, Merry Lexmas, available on @Spotify @SpotifyUSA!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lexi, a singer-songwriter blending pop, country, and acoustic storytelling, shares her unconventional path into music. She explains that her entry was almost accidental: she was a dancer and theater student, joined a girl band after an audition, moved to London, and found herself immersed in the pop world with Warner. She describes the early six months signed with Warner as sleepless and surreal, followed by two years in a girly electro-pop band that didn’t fully fit her. This led her to pursue an independent route, learning to navigate industry dynamics and realizing that labels and managers can elevate but don’t magically transform a career. Her core realization: she thrives on storytelling and personal heartbreak, and she prefers turning real-life moments into art. When describing her decision to go independent, Lexi notes the band’s creative arc ended around the same time Little Mix rose to prominence, making mainstream competition intense. She emphasizes that she wasn’t herself in that environment and spent the last decade finding her authentic sound—rooted in soul, country, and storytelling. She loves turning painful moments into songs and believes that personal experience fuels her strongest work. Her creative process varies: in Nashville, she collaborates; in Dubai, she often writes solo and then takes rough ideas to the UK studio for refinement. She highlights that some songs come from a single moment or a conversation with a writing partner that sparks an entire track. What keeps her going includes a mix of resilience and practical changes. She acknowledges the emotional ups and downs of artistry but stresses the importance of continuing to create and improve, even during heartbreak. A pivotal factor in her current stability is moving to Dubai, where she found financial freedom that allows her to invest in production and timing. She describes Dubai as providing opportunities for emerging talent, with experiences singing for brands like Gucci, Sephora, Jack Daniels, Google, Kiehl, and Killian in Paris. This financial flexibility enables her to complete projects quickly, such as her Christmas album produced in three weeks. Lexi also details her approach to the Christmas album, which began as a creative experiment with AI tools. After being introduced to AI, she experimented with a Suno-driven process to reimagine songs. She produced a full album in three weeks using AI for production, while all vocal recordings remained real. The project features collaborations with local and international artists, including Red (on tour with Andrea Bocelli), plus guests from the UK and Dubai. The album is described as eclectic, with versions ranging from country to soulful and pop-flavored takes on classic songs; songs include her own interpretations of River by Joni Mitchell and a reimagined Country Roads. For aspiring artists, Lexi offers blunt advice: be prepared to fight, face rejection, and endure repeated “no” before hearing yes. She urges relentless self-improvement and maintaining discipline, even during personal hardship, noting that staying active—working out, writing, and producing—helps move past negative times. Her long-term goal is world-class recognition for her originals and touring worldwide, with a dream of her music someday appearing in romantic comedies. She confirms new music is on the way, with more releases planned after the Christmas album; a January push is anticipated. She invites listeners to check out the Christmas album and her broader catalog through the podcast link.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Stories Worth Hearing. I am your host, John Quick. On today's episode, I am joined by Lexi, a singer songwriter whose music blends pop, country, and acoustic influences with a strong focus on storytelling. We talk about how she first got into music, the artists who have influenced her sound, her creative process, and the advice she would give to someone just starting out. Lexi also has a new Christmas album out now. You can check it out, buy it, or download it using the link in the podcast description. I am glad you are here. Let's get into it. Speaker 1: Well, Lexi, welcome to the show. I'm super excited to hear this would be fun to chat with you. Speaker 2: Nice to meet you. Speaker 1: Nice Well, to meet be So we'll talk a little bit about your new Christmas album here in a little bit, but first tell me about how did you get into music in the first place? What inspired you to kind of dip your toes in this industry? It's, it's probably a ruthless at times industry, but you're here, you're in it. What inspired you to get involved? Speaker 2: It was a bit of an accident, to be honest. I was always musically inclined and I was dancing and studying theater. And in my second year of theater school, they basically ran an audition for a girl band and I did it and I got it. And so it was just like a surreal experience. I was at performing arts college, I was gooey eyed and 17 years old and they moved me to London and I was thrust into the pop world completely clueless, but what an amazing experience. I mean, for like the first six months when I was first signed with Warner, I had an absolute insomnia because I was just like, what is life? I was like, pinch me, I was ringing my mom, was like, mom, they're paying me but at the minute they just told us to explore London and just hang out and I'm like, when are they gonna make us work? Like this is and it was just this most strange experience, and then so after that I had two years in a fab band, it was like a girly electro pop, and if I'm honest with myself looking back, was it really me? Probably not. Was it an incredible experience, good and bad, you know, I learned so much? Yes, and then I really went kind of down the independent route, which is a long and winding road, but you learn and you get this experience that helps you carry yourself into situations when you do come across big corporations again, realizing that record labels and managers, we have this idea that they can change our life with one thing and actually you get signed and you think this is the same as what I was doing myself, so it's a lot, of course they have major connections, they do, and if you get a really great manager and label that's really excited about your project, then of course they can elevate you a lot, but there's a lot to be said about learning to do as much as you can on your own and being as self sufficient as you can, because waiting for people is a pain in the ass. Speaker 1: Yeah, so tell me about that decision, take me back to that day where you're signed to Warner, you're in this band, it's, you know, probably touring all around and then you decide to go independent. What was the kind of differentiating factor that made you want to go independent as opposed to keeping with a huge ginormous record label? Speaker 2: At that time it wasn't really a choice. I think the band ran its course. It was like, it was a strange time where we were actually doing really well. We were touring. We supported Saturdays, I don't know if you guys would remember them, but we were doing some awesome, awesome things, but it was the same time that Little Mix won The X Factor, and there was a band called Stooshie that did this, it had a rude name, but it went viral because it was so shocking and it was like, you know, you can't compete with, back then, was like, I'm gonna make myself sound old, it was like ten years ago, but back then you couldn't compete with the numbers you could get by going on the X Factor, if that makes sense. Little Mix came through X Factor and they were doing a similar vibe to what we'd been doing for the past two years. It just ran its course, and I am so grateful. We had a great experience, but I think that I wasn't myself in that environment, to be honest, and the last ten years has been me really learning about who I am and my sound and I know that sounds so cheesy but I've come full circle. I've always loved soul, I've loved country, I love storytelling, you know, so many times in this industry people are like, yeah, no, that's not going to work, that's not going to work, and it's like, do you know what, anything can fricking work if you want, if that's what you enjoy and that's what you want to do. So many people, oh yeah, just do dance, yeah, of course, I can sing on a dance record, but I don't love that music, I don't get excited to make it, I get excited to tell stories about my real heartbreaks and trials and tribulations and happy moments, like that's where I get my joy and that's what makes me keep doing it, is when I turn a moment in my life, especially if it's painful, into a piece of art, that's where I get my buzz. You know, I have friends where they love to sing, their buzz is literally from singing live and riffing and high notes and killing it that way. For me, it's like I've just bled onto the page, into the song, my story. That's, that's what I love about doing it. Speaker 1: So what keeps you going? Cause my guess is you put a lot of time, effort, work, blood, sweat, and tears into this. Speaker 2: I'm mooting. Speaker 1: Most people, yeah, most people give up. Most people try once or twice. And if they don't become quote unquote successful, then they just kind of go do something else. What's kept you in it and with the amount of drive that you have every day to wake up and go after this dream of yours? Speaker 2: I think there definitely are a few factors like the, obviously the same old badger that everyone says, you've really got to love it, stick it out. Yeah, you have got to love it, but the reality is, and ask most artists, do we love it every single day? No, it's emotional journey, you know what I mean? There's some days you love, some days you can't think of anything, some days you're blocked, some days you're lazy, so like, but in the end I just, well some days I think what else would I do? What else would I do? What would it be like a wedding planner or something? Also, to be honest, moving to Dubai was a game changer because obviously I don't like to delve too much into financials, but for example, when I was living in London, I was working hella hard and I was scraping by and I would spare spend every spare penny on a song. And I was trying to get mates rates so I could still pay for my car and my rent. And it was scrape, scrape, scrape, scrape, scrape. In COVID I accidentally got a gig on new year's eve in Dubai. I just stayed and I just, there was nothing to go home for at that time. The weather was. And then, you know, no one could work. We were all out of work. We were all at home. And I was like, hold on. I might as well just stay and enjoy the sunshine. And basically, in that time that I just stayed and enjoyed the sunshine, I networked my ass off, I made friends and when Dubai opened back up again, lo and behold, I went into pretty much full time work and it has been life changing. Like I've been here now on New Year's Eve five years exactly, and I've just bought my second beachfront apartment. Thank you. No, thank you. And I don't say that to brag, I say it to show that like the quality of living and the opportunity here is vast, it is great and you know opportunities that for example if you were in America or in UK would go to a pop star, already established pop star, shall we say, in Dubai those opportunities go for emerging talent and you know since being here I've been able to sing for Gucci, Sephora, Jack Daniels, Google, Kiehl, Killian in Paris, and it's like when I think about if I was in London, would that be me or would that be, you know, the big, big stars that are already kind of big names? So that's the excitement here is waking up and thinking anything could happen, but at the same time obviously I sometimes do feel a bit disconnected from The UK and America because I know like obviously the music scenes there are really consolidated and it's very new here, so I do get over there, over to The States kind of two or three times a year if I can to just kind of enjoy Nashville, immerse myself into the scene and connect and you know all the good stuff, so I try to be in both to really absorb and inspire myself with both. Sorry, all that to say, you said, keeps me going? Obviously, sorry, I told you I'd ramble on. Obviously the financial freedom that I have given myself since being in Dubai has made my musical journey more enjoyable. Okay, so like that's not to say I've got unlimited money to just go, go, go, but if I want to finish a song and I want to finish it quick, I can afford to pay my producer. Know, if I want to, I decided to make the Christmas album in three weeks. Obviously I was on a bit of a budget because there were so many songs, connections here and I made it happen, you know, for a decent amount. And I was able to, you know, for example, the money wasn't a block, like, oh, I can't afford it. I was just able to do what I wanted to do. So people might say you don't need it, but I'm sorry. It really helps. Speaker 1: Walk me through a little bit about that process as it relates to your songs. Speaker 2: That is my most inspired stage is when I've been through an experience. Obviously, do write other times in my life as well, but when I am heartbroken it just floods, it literally floods and it can be in any form, sometimes it's a title or something I want to say. Like I remember, for example, last time I was in Nashville, I came and I was absolutely heartbroken and I was catching up with my girlfriend who I write with quite a lot and I told her this whole story about this guy and she just went, Lex, it's his loss and I went, that's today's song and then we just went upstairs, sat by the pool with the guitars and we wrote his loss and it was literally the song became the conversation with my mate and I think that is my style. I think my skill is saying things in a way that so many women and guys but like you know so many of us experience these things and these kind of treatments and these moments in our life and you know, I just say them really raw and real and people are like, yeah, that happened to me too, and I love that, I love when women reach out and they're like, oh my God, I've been through the same, that's what I get so much joy from. I mean, other times I collaborate, other times I'm on my own, I don't have one given way that I create, I change it all the time, as I say, when I'm in Nashville, I do a lot of collaboration, when I'm in Dubai, it does tend to be kind of me coming up with an idea, often it'll be very rough and then I'll take it into the studio with some of my trusted guys back in The UK. So it changes every single time. Speaker 1: What kind of advice would you give to folks that are maybe just starting off? A lot of folks that listen to this podcast are kind of starting off into, into their own entrepreneurial world. Maybe it's, you know, becoming a singer songwriter or open an e commerce store. A lot of them on the, are on the front end of their journey. So what kind of advice would you give to folks that are starting out in the music industry and listening to this today? Speaker 2: Get ready to fight and to be tough and to be shoved down and to be ignored. And for all your best friends to not share your stuff or to not support until you're already famous. It's the tale as old as time. It's going to be no, no, no, no, no, no, no, and you just got to be, as I say, relentless until you get that yes, and all the time in the meantime, you keep making yourself better, and this is what I say to my girlfriends, even when I'm in breakups or, you know, not to go too deep into like mental health, but I think we all have our times where we're down and we feel deflated and then other times we're inspired and motivated. My biggest advice is regardless of where you're at mentally, do the good stuff, do the good stuff, and so if I'm heartbroken I still work out, even though I feel dead inside sometimes. I remember the last breakup, I felt empty inside but I thought, you know what, when I come out of this in two months time, I'm gonna be better. I'm gonna be fitter, I'm gonna be wiser, I'm gonna have written more songs, I'm gonna have done all that good stuff and lo and behold, when you finally come out, you thank your past self for doing them positive things and that's kind of where I'm at at the minute is my discipline has got to a level now and I'm really pleased with myself and especially during making productivity and discipline has levelled up in the last couple of months and I'm so happy because I've kind of weeded out that procrastination time and I'm just getting on with it and actually when you get into that state, like there's a vibe, there's a vibration going on there and you get rolling in that state and good things start to come. So I can't, I don't know how to explain it, but. Speaker 1: That's awesome. So you just released a Christmas album. Talk to me a little bit about this album for folks listening in. I think you can get it on Spotify and probably everywhere you could find music. But talk to me a little bit about this album and why you, you know, it was time for a Christmas album. Speaker 2: Well, classic, partly psychotic legacy. So it was like the November 5 and one of my friends kind of introduced me to the AI world and I was like, you know, maybe I should start to play and try to get into the future because I'm really not a computer girl. I'm very much a go out there, live life, write about my stories and my experiences, I'm not one to sit down and figure things out on the laptop, but it kind of showed me a bit and I thought, let me mess around and make a few versions of stuff. So, I actually got booked for a fabulous gig in South Africa where they wanted me to do country songs and one of the songs they wanted was Country Roads, but I kind of got this John Denver backing track and I was like, this is not punching for me and it's not in my key and even when I change the key it's not sounding right, so I thought, right, let me play around. Anyway, my gosh, I put it into this app, Suno, and I swear I made like the Super Bowl version of Country Roads. Speaker 1: Nice. Speaker 2: I was like, this is cool. And so I actually got excited and passionate to kind of immerse myself into using it more and just like really pushing the boundaries of what I could do without relying on someone else, if that makes sense. So early November, did a version of River by Joni Mitchell, which is just a lovely song that not many people actually know, but I love. And I created this fab version and I don't know what came over me. I just thought, oh, maybe I should just do a whole album in three weeks and document the whole thing. And that's what I did. I just went full turbo, made a full album in three weeks, all on AI, not the voices, all the voices is real recordings, real artists, but all the production is AI created. And then I just collaborated with loads of local artists, some international overseas, we've got Red on there, she's a bit of an international superstar now, she's been on tour with Andrea Bocelli, she's getting quite well known around the world, she's quite big on TikTok, got some celebs in The UK, some local talent in Dubai and you know what, it was just the most joyous experience. I was locked in this room for three weeks straight and I just had the best time of my life. People popping in, got an Italian singer on, she came round with cookies, My girl from Vegas, she came round, she's on a song. It was just, it was random. I don't know what made me do it, but I just did it. But now, I'm so proud of the creation. I'm, maybe this is like, I'm not meant to say this, but I've been listening to it myself. I really like it. Because I just picked all my favorite songs and made like cool, like, pop soulful country versions of them. Some of them are more country. Some of them are soulful. Like, it's really eclectic. So, yeah, I don't know what made me do it. Just did. Speaker 1: It's awesome. So Speaker 2: And it's out. Speaker 1: Let's pretend it's ten years from now. What's your ultimate goal? What's your, you know, what could you, what is it in your mind where you could look back and say, okay, I made it. Is there something out there that, you know, ten years from now you want to be at this peak or that chart or whatever? Speaker 2: Yeah. World domination. No, I'm joking. I'm joking. Do you know what? I just want, I just want my music to be appreciated and celebrated worldwide, and I want to be performing it worldwide. Like a lot of singers, I have to do all kinds of gigs to make my bread and butter money and keep the dream alive, and I pump the money I earn from that into the dream. But you know what? Everyone that sees me sing my original music, she's like, found so much better when you do your original music. I just love singing my songs. I just wanna sing my just wanna sing my songs every day. And I want people to listen and care. Yeah. I just yeah. I'd love I'd love love love to be touring around, doing my originals. I want my originals in those romantic comedies. I love a good cheesy chick flick. So, I'm just waiting for Colin Farrell to call and say he's gonna put my song over his next movie or Speaker 1: Nice. Hey, you never know, right? Well, it's been fun chatting with you. Twenty minutes here has gone by enough. Flash, Lexi, do you have any last minute thoughts here before we head off? Speaker 2: Yeah. Just an apology because I talk so much. No. I guess there'll be new music coming soon as well. I mean, I've just, obviously, I've put out the Christmas album, so you'll better be rocking around the Christmas tree to that this Christmas. But I'm gonna be coming with new stuff in January and onwards. Speaker 1: Awesome. Well, we'll put, for folks listening in the, a link to the music is in the podcast description. Go check it out. Go go buy or download all of our music. Lexi, you're welcome back anytime. Thanks so much for coming on the show. We hope you have a great rest of your day. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.
Saved - December 13, 2025 at 5:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Just presented irrefutable evidence for immediate market withdrawal of mRNA shots to a certain state governor’s office, alongside many brave scientists and physicians. It appears to have been successful. A multi-state push for a moratorium on mRNA is now underway.