TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NicHulscher

Saved - March 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Mel Gibson isn't lying... A recent study documented COMPLETE REMISSION of Stage IV cancers using fenbendazole. Patients with advanced melanoma, breast, and prostate cancer saw their tumors disappear — without chemotherapy. Clinical trials must be launched immediately. https://t.co/f1J0Ot7crt

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/Flk7b6qBFW

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 7:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a peer-reviewed study claims mRNA vaccines are gene-altering, reprogramming human gene expression across systems. It cites persistent proteomic changes months post-injection and signals of genomic integration in tumor DNA, suggesting possible genome editing. The authors warn the platform’s use beyond COVID, including cancer, influenza, RSV, personalized therapies, and self-amplifying RNA, and call for an immediate suspension with surveillance.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies We found mRNA gene-transfer shots fundamentally REPROGRAM human gene expression across multiple biological systems — warranting IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION of the ENTIRE mRNA platform. Our newly published peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons presents compelling evidence that mRNA vaccines operate through a gene-altering mechanism of action — fundamentally reprogramming human biology: (1) Transcriptomic Reprogramming: mRNA injections alter how human genes are switched on and off across critical cellular systems controlling metabolism, protein regulation, and stress responses. (2) Persistent Proteomic Alterations: Hundreds of circulating proteins remain altered for months after injection, demonstrating prolonged systemic biological effects. (3) Genomic Integration Signals: Multi-omic molecular analysis detected a host–vector chimeric sequence involving vaccine genetic material within human tumor DNA — suggesting a possible genomic integration event. This means the issue is no longer limited to COVID shots. The same mRNA platform is rapidly being deployed for: • cancer injections • influenza injections • RSV injections • personalized mRNA therapeutics • self-amplifying RNA platforms This dangerous gene-transfer platform was rolled out to BILLIONS of people without molecular surveillance, genomic monitoring, or biological circuit breakers capable of stopping aberrant gene expression. Immediate and comprehensive suspension of mRNA injections for human use is therefore required. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @AAPSonline

Saved - March 5, 2026 at 1:54 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters https://t.co/OP3FcwPLXW

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 9:31 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Living Near a Cell Tower Linked to White Blood Cell Elevation Comparable to SMOKING 24% of residents living within 60 meters of a tower had abnormally high immune cell counts and over 50% of heavy phone users suffered the same — a signal of BIOLOGICAL STRESS. Researchers didn’t rely on surveys or symptoms. They drew blood, measured radiofrequency exposure inside participants’ homes, and analyzed complete immune cell profiles. The findings were striking: ⚠️RF exposure from nearby towers predicted elevated monocytes — a key inflammatory white blood cell — at levels comparable to smoking. ⚠️Nearly 1 in 4 residents near towers had immune markers above clinical limits ⚠️More than half of heavy mobile phone users (4–6 hrs/day) showed the same abnormal immune signal ⚠️The majority affected were under 30 years old White blood cells rise when the body detects stress from toxins, inflammation, or environmental exposures. When these immune markers cross clinical limits, it signals the body is reacting. As the authors concluded: “These results indicate human biological systems are under stress from both mobile phone use and local mobile phone tower exposures.”

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - February 27, 2026 at 8:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I list vaccines that were pulled: Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955) after 10 deaths; Swine Flu Vaccine (1976) after 20-50 deaths; RotaShield Vaccine (1999) after 10-15 bowel obstructions; Chikungunya Vaccine (2025) after 3 deaths; COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026) 500,000+ deaths.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955): PULLED after 10 deaths. Swine Flu Vaccine (1976): PULLED after 20-50 deaths. RotaShield Vaccine (1999): PULLED after 10-15 cases of bowel obstruction. Chikungunya Vaccine (2025): PULLED after 3 deaths. COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026): 500,000+ deaths.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nick, what does the Maha crew need to do and what do the people need to be demanding? First, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does the Maha crew need to do, and what do the people need to be demanding, Nick? Well, first, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:02 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates and Epstein began planning pandemics in 2011. 2011–2017: Emails/texts between Gates and Epstein discuss pandemic simulations and vaccine funding structures. 2019: Event 201 co-hosted by Gates Foundation simulates a global coronavirus pandemic weeks before COVID. https://t.co/3XVicCUFNy

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Beyond horrific. 2011: Bill Gates and Epstein began planning the Pandemic 2015: Gates partners with the WHO, World Bank, MSF and the UN 2017: Simulations are treated as a Business Model 2019: Covid Pandemic Simulation occurs which later happens with astonishing accuracy… https://t.co/qB5mA7bZCw

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 10:49 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995 We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️ Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database. Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago. Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified: 📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination 📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States Among those 299 U.S. reports: 📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2 📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window 📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination 📍40.1% occurred within 7 days 📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines 📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%). The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination. Since 1995 in the United States: 💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS 🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era. Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher. In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 48 hours, MMR vaccine uptake may face TOTAL COLLAPSE. No parent wants to inject their baby with a DEADLY product. Public health agencies should have listened to grieving parents — and conducted this study years ago. Now they’ll have to scramble for damage control.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We have just uncovered data that could result in the END of the MMR vaccine. Stay tuned.

Saved - February 14, 2026 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that states are declaring public health emergencies over infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA vaccine adverse events. I see CDC data allegedly showing babies dying at >50% excess years after mass vaccination of childbearing women. I am told genomic transfer of vaccine material to babies is claimed, causing deadly consequences. The 30-year decline supposedly collapsed in 2021 after the mRNA campaign, signaling a transgenerational crisis.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

States have begun declaring public health emergencies over skyrocketing infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA “vaccine” fatal adverse events. CDC data shows babies born are now dying at a >50% excess rate — YEARS after mass vaccination of childbearing women. Genomic integration in mothers likely transfers Pfizer/Moderna genetic material into the baby, resulting in deadly consequences. The 30-year decline in infant mortality collapsed in 2021, immediately following the mRNA injection campaign. A transgenerational crisis is here — children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are just now identifying signals of transgenerational harm. So I'm not talking about transgender anymore. I'm talking about through generations. Right? So what's happened now is according to CDC data, if you look at it, starting right after the mass vaccination of childbearing age women in early twenty twenty one, there's a statistically significant inflection point. Right? So infant mortality rates are steadily going down for thirty years. 2021 hits mass vaccination. Boom. It shoots right up. It hasn't gone down since. It's 2025. That's the death of babies. Babies. Yeah. And and babies so babies in 2025 are now dying at seventy seven percent excess. Even Mississippi just declared a state of emergency over it. Really? Wait. Tell talk about Mother's aren't taking the shots anymore. No, they're not. It appears some of this genetic material appears to integrate into their body, possibly passed off. So it's it's a legacy effect probably. Most people took the shots in 2021. That's that's my concern is that how there could be effects through the generations.
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 2:42 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A recent study found glyphosate causes 10+ cancers in rats at “safe” doses. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD. https://t.co/pVMonvCxus

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a controversial 2000 study and its alleged connections to Monsanto. The speaker asserts that Monsanto staff helped write the article, and that the authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto. They claim much of the data in the study was unpublished, describing it as secret data from Monsanto, and label the paper “basically a complete fraud.” The study supposedly claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The speaker then references subsequent studies released recently, which purportedly found that glyphosate increased or caused ten distinct types of cancer in rats when the rats were exposed at so-called safe levels. Despite these findings, the speaker notes that the original paper was used by agencies around the world to claim glyphosate was safe and to support approval processes. The speaker concludes that the entire foundation of those safety assurances was built on “a complete fraud and lie,” and states that the retraction of the 2000 paper is, in this context, something they are happy about, remarking that it is probably the only time they will be happy about a retraction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This study was published in the year 2000, and now it was revealed that actually Monsanto staff helped write this article. The authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto, and many of the data in this study was unpublished, the secret data from Monsanto. So it was basically a complete fraud and it claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The and now we have all these studies that came out recently finding that glyphosate increase or caused 10 distinct types of cancer in rats when they're exposed at so called safe levels. And so this paper though was used by our agencies across the world to claim glyphosate was safe and in the approval processes. And so now all of that was built on a complete fraud and lie. And so this retraction is probably the only time I will be happy about a retraction.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Department of Health just found that your favorite bread is laced with carcinogenic glyphosate. https://t.co/YwK0mDESLd

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:46 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots. And we also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well. Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well. And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely. We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods. For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body. Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories. The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date. A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression. Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary: 40+ ER visits 200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines) 100+ lab investigations 100+ imaging/functional studies Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded. SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out: 🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories. 🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens. 📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination). Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed: 📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities. 📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA. 📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation. 📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative. 📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure. Serial skin biopsies demonstrated: 📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent. 📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent. 📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen. 📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways. Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility. Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04. This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways. Yes, we were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 36 hours, irrefutable molecular evidence will be released with major global implications. 200+ specialist evaluations across 18 medical disciplines 100+ advanced laboratory investigations 100+ imaging /functional diagnostic studies 70+ alternative diagnoses ruled out https://t.co/6JcAzsEWGd

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:54 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Why Some People Are Not Harmed by COVID-19 "Vaccination" Some batches cause mass injury and death. Others are harmless duds. 🔥 Hot lots: DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, heavy metals 🧊 Dud lots: Degraded. Inactive. Multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm: batch determines fate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's now four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. We're actually the early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. And, yes, some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events. Some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Since batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 mRNA injections has been demonstrated, checking your batch can be a useful tool to help predict possible long-term adverse events: https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html https://t.co/SEUq1CvHxw

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

The Safety of COVID-19 'Vaccines' is Batch-Dependent Epidemiologist @NicHulscher explains with @chriswerge Full Episode: https://youtu.be/zx0I8ku81tI?si=C2z7l3Ixkr9s87VT #MFScholar

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study ever conducted found that vaccine mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein can persist in humans for at least 3.5 YEARS — independently confirmed across multiple labs, biospecimens, and time points using multiple methods. https://t.co/odfaKuHTgK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes what he claims is the strongest case report ever done on vaccine injury, specifically mRNA vaccine injury. The subject is a 51-year-old man who developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, and skin disturbances, constituting multisystem long vaccine syndrome. The key findings are said to be detected 3.6 years after his last shot. Exosomes circulating in his body allegedly contain Pfizer mRNA, and this mRNA is still present in those exosomes years after vaccination. The same mRNA is reportedly also found in his skin. In addition, plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process is claimed to be present in his skin, again 3.6 years after vaccination. Specifically, the plasmid DNA allegedly includes the SV40 segment, the spike expression cassette, and the open reading frame region, with all components of the plasmids in the Grover's disease–affected skin area. Microscopic analysis of the Grover’s disease area allegedly showed staining for SARS-CoV-2 spike or vaccine spike, indicating the presence of spike protein in that skin region. This staining for spike protein is reported as occurring 3.6 years after the shot. Overall, the speaker asserts that all vaccine components—mRNA, plasmid DNA with defined segments, and spike protein—remain in the body for multiple years, with findings in exosomes and skin indicating long-lasting presence. The speaker also asserts that this represents a situation in which “we were completely lied to.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's probably the strongest case report, ever done on vaccine injury, mRNA vaccine injury. So what we found was in an individual, 51 year old man, he developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, skin disturbances. So he has multisystem long vaccine syndrome. We found three point six years after his last shot circulating Pfizer mRNA in what's called his exosomes. These kind of bubbles circulate around the body, act as as kind of messengers. So the mRNA is still in there. Pfizer mRNA as well as in his skin. You won't even believe it. We found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process. Again, three point six years after literally just placed in his skin. It was the s v 40 segment of it. It was the spike expression cassette of it and it was the open reading frame region. So all components of the plasmas were in his skin in what's called the Grover's disease area where he developed the skin disease from the shot. And then we looked microscopically inside of this Grover's disease area, and we literally stained it for SARS CoV two spike or vaccine spike, and we found it. It's stained. Third, 3.6 after his shot, he still has spike protein in his skin. And so we found all these vaccine components, it appears they last for multiple years, and we were completely lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

x.com/i/article/2018…

Article Cover

STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years

For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body.

Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories.

The resulting paper, titled Unprecedented" target="_blank">https://zenodo.org/records/18460099">Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date — involving >40 emergency department visits, >200 specialist encounters across 18 medical disciplines, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and serial blood and tissue sampling performed at multiple timepoints over more than 3.5 years.

The findings reveal longitudinal molecular evidence that vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein can persist in human blood and tissue more than 3.5 years after vaccination — independently confirmed across multiple laboratories using diverse analytical methods.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively excluded: nucleocapsid antibodies remained negative across five separate timepoints and three independent laboratories, and nucleocapsid protein was absent in tissue specimens despite the presence of spike protein deposition.

Article image

Case Presentation

We report a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and subsequently developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction consistent with post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), involving cardiopulmonary, neurologic, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, autonomic, otolaryngologic, audiovestibular, immune, ophthalmic, dermatologic, and psychiatric domains. Clinical manifestations included: pulmonary emboli; delayed MRI-confirmed myocarditis; neurocognitive impairment; small fiber neuropathy; autonomic dysfunction; myalgia; chronic pancreatic and gastrointestinal involvement; worsened tinnitus with sensorineural hearing loss; voice dysphagia and dysphonia; ophthalmic disturbances; chronic dermatologic inflammation; and anxiety/depression. The case was evaluated through a uniquely extensive longitudinal, multi-domain clinical investigation spanning molecular, immunologic, genetic, proteomic, transcriptomic, and tissue-based analyses, undertaken to characterize disease mechanisms and exclude alternative etiologies.

Article image

Extensive Diagnostic Evaluation

After >40 emergency department visits and >200 outpatient specialty encounters, the patient underwent >100 non-routine laboratory investigations and >100 imaging/functional studies. This evaluation systematically excluded underlying etiologic mechanisms across infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular/vascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic domains. Testing remained largely nondiagnostic. A possible undocumented/undiagnosed asymptomatic infection manifesting as Long COVID was suspected after myocarditis diagnosis, and serology was pursued; unexpected results prompted expanded immune and tissue-based testing for spike- and vaccine-derived components. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were negative across five separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by three independent laboratories. The patient remains nucleocapsid negative with persistently elevated spike antibody levels (4,553 U/mL) 1,433 days after the final vaccination.

Specimen Collection and Analytical Methods

Blood and skin tissue specimens were obtained at multiple time points between 852–1,364 days after the final Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Biological compartments analyzed included plasma, circulating exosomes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and skin tissue. Specimens were evaluated across multiple independent laboratories using diverse analytical methodologies, including ELISA, automated immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, standard PCR with Sanger sequencing confirmation, whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomic profiling, and quantitative mass spectrometry.

Article image

Persistent Circulating Spike Protein and Vaccine-Derived mRNA

At 852 days post-vaccination, blood-based immune testing identified detectable SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein within classical and non-classical monocyte subsets with associated cytokine and immune marker abnormalities.

At 1,173 days post-vaccination, high-sensitivity ELISA detected free Wuhan spike protein in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) and in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL).

At 1,284 days, RT-PCR identified vaccine-derived spike mRNA within circulating exosomes, whereas PBMC RNA remained negative following DNase-treated extraction and amplicon-specific PCR targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3).

Serologic profiling at 1,173 and 1,284 days post-vaccination demonstrated persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL and 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL, respectively), consistent with ongoing antigenic stimulation and an immune-tolerance–skewed response.

Article image

Persistent Spike Protein and Plasmid DNA in Skin Tissue

Serial skin biopsies at 1,160, 1,249, and 1,364 days post-vaccination, all from truncal skin within areas of clinically active Grover’s disease, were nucleocapsid negative and demonstrated persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial cells and macrophages by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation. Spike protein was also found in nerve fibers at 1,364 days.

The 1,364-day skin biopsy contained multiple plasmid DNA elements, including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and the SV40 enhancer, confirming durable retention of vaccine-derived DNA in somatic tissue by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.

Article image

Multi-Omic Analysis

Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways.

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility.

Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04.

Conclusion

This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. The convergence of these observations across longitudinal blood and tissue sampling provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine-derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in vivo for years following administration.

In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways.

These data challenge prevailing assumptions regarding rapid degradation and short-lived biological activity of mRNA vaccine components and underscore the need for controlled longitudinal studies to determine prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of persistent vaccine-derived material.

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 12:38 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Bill Gates was planning “Pandemic Simulations” with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017. You can’t make this up. https://t.co/kCLyFNssbo

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speakers acknowledge that they did not simulate or practice the current situation. - They note this work is being done on behalf of their partners at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. - They indicate that the efforts span both health policies and economic policies. - They describe the current environment as uncharted territory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now here we are. You know, we we didn't simulate this. We didn't practice. On behalf of our partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in unchartered territory.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:56 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump recently signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/BLHJweg3E0

Video Transcript AI Summary
By around 2030, the smartphone as we know it today will not be the usual kind of the most common interface; many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About six gs earlier, which is around 2,030. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, how concerned should we be about five gs towers, do think? I'm very concerned about it. So, like nine, ten? Calling it five gs is actually a misnomer because that doesn't have to do with five gs does not tell you what's wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths and some of them are very bad. And in Europe, the regulations are order of magnitude lower than what we allow here. But there are literally over 10,000 studies that just document a number of ill effects, including cancer, tumor growth,

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - January 19, 2026 at 1:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I assert our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the largest vaxxed vs unvaxxed study shows vaccinated children are far sicker across all 22 chronic diseases, with increases like Neurodevelopmental disorders +1254%, Autoimmune +1120%, Motor +810%, and 15–22—disorders like ADHD, Diabetes, and Learning disability—observed only in vaccinated kids. Bottom line: 22/22 chronic conditions worse in vaccinated children; zero in unvaccinated. The CDC’s schedule drives these epidemics.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the LARGEST vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study in HISTORY shows vaccinated children are FAR sicker across ALL 22 chronic diseases: 1. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Cancer: 📈 +54% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children (ZERO cases in unvaccinated): 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Bottom line: 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were worse in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions. The CDC’s hyper-vaccination schedule is driving the modern epidemics of chronic disease and autism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what we did was we looked at the raw numbers, right? So the original study, they did so much modeling, like statistical models, and we really didn't see just the raw proportions between the groups. When we looked at the raw proportions, it was every single, all 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated. All 22 including cancer. Really? Because I mean, they said in the study it kind of uses cancer as the control, saying there was no difference in cancer, and you're saying there was a difference in cancer. Yes, so when it comes to rare outcomes, the modeling they use, you know, it's not very reliable, and so they didn't do any basic proportional analysis, but when we did that and we looked, cancer was fifty four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. So they had fifty four percent more cases and, you know, this is explained biologically. There is biological plausibility behind it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.” If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate? But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just curious. You see What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. Speaker 2: What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell. Speaker 3: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Speaker 1: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems I've looked at a lot of studies. There's three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 4: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 3: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 4: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 5: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune disease, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders What Speaker 1: kind of numbers are we talking about? Do you remember? Speaker 4: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 3: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and, you know, immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 3: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk. Speaker 4: For example, there were two hundred and sixty two children who had ADHD in the Speaker 5: vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
Saved - January 18, 2026 at 9:25 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Yes, our study concluded that the current H5N1 bird flu outbreak likely originated from the USDA Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory—and not a single U.S. government agency has challenged our findings. https://t.co/iDlxjUHp8t

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Bird Flu Was Created In A US Research Lab Using Gain Of Function... “Current H5N1 strain is man-made from USDA gain-of-function serial passage research in Athens, Georgia...extended to waterfowl, cattle, mammals!” — Dr. Peter McCullough, MD https://t.co/O7zhmfhRbR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Cardcaine, an epidemiologist from the University of Michigan, is identified as the person who broke the story in February about a bird flu outbreak linked to the USDA research lab. He states that mainstream media are not reporting on this development. He also asserts that Peter Hotez will not tell the public about this information. According to the speaker, the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak was created in a lab through serial passage conducted in a U.S. government laboratory. The claim specifies that this lab-driven process enabled the virus to jump from traditional chickens to migratory waterfowl. From there, the outbreak purportedly spread to cows, marking a transition from poultry to other species in the ecosystem. The narrative presented emphasizes that the origin and progression of the outbreak are laboratory-generated, rather than arising solely from natural spillover events. The speaker highlights that the virus was manipulated via serial passage in a government lab, a technique used to adapt pathogens to new hosts or improve transmissibility. The sequence described claims a progression: initial adaptation in poultry, transmission to migratory waterfowl, and subsequent appearance in cattle. The speaker underscores two supplementary points: first, that major media outlets have not reported on this angle of the outbreak; second, that a well-known public figure in the field, Peter Hotez, is portrayed as someone who would supposedly not disclose this information. The overall message portrays a narrative of concealment and laboratory involvement in the emergence and spread of the bird flu across species, culminating in its presence in cows. In summary, the speaker attributes the outbreak to deliberate laboratory manipulation via serial passage in a U.S. government facility, tracing a path from chickens to migratory waterfowl and then to cows, while accusing mainstream media of omission and suggesting that Peter Hotez would not disclose these details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cardcaine epidemiologist from University of Michigan. He's the one who broke the story on this clague February, this bird flu that came out of the USDA research lab. You know, the mainstream media is not reporting on this and Peter Hotez will never tell you this, but the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak is created in a lab through serial passage in a US government lab. It got it to spread from traditional chicken into migratory waterfowl, and now it's into the cows. Incredible, incredible.
Saved - January 17, 2026 at 10:10 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Over 70% of humanity received a neurotoxic COVID shot now linked to 146 serious brain, spinal cord, and psychiatric adverse events. This explains the widespread collapse of common sense, deterioration of cognitive function, and drastic personality distortions seen since 2020. https://t.co/fX02G6zBz5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. So what this study does is it confirms our suspicions and observations of the past five years that common sense has completely deteriorated, from the minds of the population. And so what this study did was they looked at the VAERS system back from the nineties and all the way up till 2024, and they looked at what's called PRRs, proportional reporting ratios. What this is is how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. And what they found was absolutely disturbing. 8686 safety signals of these neuropsychiatric adverse events. Some of them up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. And we have to remember the CDC FDA safety signal is defined for PRRs as greater than two. Well, all of these were greater than two and this includes schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, psychosis. So people are are hallucinating and and and so it's clearly damaging the brain. This is such a large number of safety signals and and it also confirms what would of a study that came out two weeks ago where people who had strokes, they looked inside their brains and they found they are in fact producing this toxic spike protein for up to seventeen months in their brain after these shots. And so that probably explains why we see this deterioration in cognitive function.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Have you observed a change in the personalities of your vaccinated friends or family members since they received their injections? "There is a strong association between Covid-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders." "Psychosis, 440 times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, 315 times."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you noticed your friends or family who are vaccinated actually have a whole different personality or are more angry, just overall different since getting the injections? Well, there is a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders. Let's jump in. So this comes directly from the FDA and the CDC, and I'm gonna leave the link to the study in the comments, of course, but these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over. And so you'll see that all these things I'm about to list off are a more likely determination. So these are times as well. So psychosis, four forty times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, three fifteen times. Suicidal thoughts,
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 3:14 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Ongoing CYBERATTACKS are preventing access to the largest COVID-19 "vaccine" cancer study EVER conducted. The systematic review documents 300+ peer-reviewed COVID shot turbo cancer cases across 27 countries. ~50% of the cancers occurred within 2–4 weeks of injection.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 reports that the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal. They say the article was hit with cyberattacks just before publication, preventing online posting, and that the FBI was contacted. The piece then appeared in PubMed, but is described as having gone down again after another cyberattack on the journal. The core findings, as claimed, are that the researchers collected all of the cancer evidence associated with the COVID shots and found over three hundred confirmed vaccine-related cancer cases documented in peer-reviewed literature. This number is described as not representing the total seen in real-world data, but rather the count of cases identified by scientists within peer-reviewed sources, thereby supporting the claim that the phenomenon is real. The cancers span every type imaginable, with lymphoma accounting for about forty percent of the cases. Two large population-level studies are highlighted, totaling about ten million people. These studies reportedly show a major increased risk of multiple cancers in vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated populations, with up to seven types of cancers increased. A military dataset consisting of around 1.2 million people is cited, in which lymphoma was reported to have increased drastically in 2021 among military members who were mandated to receive the shots. The summary characterizes the paper as so damning that it is presented as evidence that these shots are carcinogenic, and attributes the cyberattacks and other online disruptions to efforts to suppress these findings. The speaker emphasizes the sequence of cyber warfare activity around publication, the breadth of cancer types reported, and the notable increases in cancer incidence in large vaccinated populations, including a significant rise in lymphoma within the military cohort.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal, and they got hit with cyberattacks by positive yeah. Yeah. They got hit with cyber attacks just before they published it, so they couldn't put it online. And, the FBI was contacted, by the way. And so it got up into PubMed. And what they found was oh, by the way, now it's down again. The journal's been hit with another cyber attack. Wow. Yep. So this but the the I just wanna say what they found. They collected all of the cancer evidence of the COVID shots. And they found over three hundred confirmed vaccine turbo cancer cases documented in the peer reviewed literature. So that's that's not like the number that we see on the real world. That's just the number of, you know, scientists that collected these cases and found them. So we know it's real, and it spans every single type of cancer you could think of lymphoma was like forty percent of the cases. So it is doing that. But what's most shocking is there are two population large scale population studies, totaling now about ten million people where they do find, you know, a major increased risks of multiple cancers up seven types of cancers are increased in the vaccinated populations compared to the unvaccinated. And there was a military data set in there 1,200,000 people, I believe some type of lymphoma was increased drastically in 2021. The military members that were mandated to take these shots, these certain types of cancers skyrocketed. And so this paper is so damning that, you know, we know for sure that these shots are carcinogenic, and so that's why they're getting hit with, illegal, cyber warfare activities.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

JUST IN - Reported cyberattack takes oncology journal offline that published a peer-reviewed study from Tufts and Brown University exploring links of COVID injections to newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened cancer shortly after COVID injections. https://www.disclose.tv/id/63ece33cuo/

Study linking mRNA injections and cancer 'censored' by cyberattack Breaking news from around the world. disclose.tv
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:00 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Landmark Study of an ENTIRE COUNTRY (n=51 Million) Confirms COVID Shots Induced VAIDS in EVERY Age Group Vaccinated Koreans suffered a dose-dependent rise in the common cold, upper-respiratory infections, pneumonia, and tuberculosis — up to +559%. Kids were hit hardest.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a nationwide study conducted in South Korea, stating that every resident was included in the research. The study compared individuals who received the vaccine to those who did not, and the analysis was stratified by dose number (one dose, two doses, three doses, and four or more doses). A central claim of the speaker is that this study provides the strongest signal to date supporting vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, referred to as VADES. According to the speaker, as each dose was administered, the immune function of individuals declined. By the time of the fourth dose, the speaker asserts there was a significant increase in the risk of other infections, quantified as about a 550% increase, including infections such as the common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. The speaker notes that the effect was most pronounced in young people, specifically ages zero to nineteen, who reportedly had the highest risks of these other infections. The implication presented is that the injections are causing immune collapse and exhausting T cells, leading to immune dysregulation described as IgG4 class switching. The immune system is said to become dysfunctional as a result. Additionally, the speaker mentions that, consistent with other studies they reference, genes related to immune function are claimed to become shut down. The overall assertion is that these findings point to a troubling pattern of immune impairment associated with multiple vaccine doses, culminating in the claimed immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to other infections. The speaker emphasizes the magnitude and reliability of the sample size, stating that having an entire country’s population as the study cohort constitutes the strongest possible sample size. The summary of the presented claims centers on dose-dependent immune decline, a marked increase in non-target infections after the fourth dose, greater impact on children, evidence of immune system exhaustion and dysregulation, and purported genetic downregulation of immune pathways, all described as arising from the vaccination regimen in this nationwide South Korean study.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You couldn't get a stronger study than this. Every single resident in South Korea was in this study. Every single one. And so what do they do in this study? Well, they, again, compared who got the vaccine. They compared and compared it to who didn't, and they stratified by dose number. But the shocking thing about this study is, before we dig into it, is this is a the strongest signal that we have to date that vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is real or what's called VADES. So what happened in this study was as as each dose was incurred among these South Koreans, so they get one dose, two dose, three dose, four plus doses, each time they got another dose, their immune function dropped off. And they got up to they suffered when you reached the fourth dose, you started to suffer about 550 increased risks of other infections, common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. It's it was an absolute travesty. And you know who was affected the most? Was young children, ages zero to 19. They had the highest risks of these other infections. So what's happening is these injections are causing immune collapse. They're exhausting the T cells. They're causing immune dysregulation, what's called IgG four class switching. The immune system literally becomes dysfunctional. And as our other studies indicated, genes related to immune function literally become shut down. And so this is very disturbing. And, again, you can't get a stronger sample size than an entire country.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559% Landmark study of the ENTIRE South Korean population reveals a VAIDS signal — a dose-dependent rise in the common cold, upper-respiratory infections, pneumonia, and tuberculosis among the vaccinated. Those that received 4+ COVID shots suffered: 📈Common Cold ↑ +559% (children 0–19) 📈Upper-Respiratory Infections ↑ +83% (children 0–19) 📈Pneumonia ↑ +91% (COVID-negative group) 📈Tuberculosis ↑ +35% (COVID-positive group) Even after adjusting for age, sex, income, comorbidities, prior infection, and time since vaccination, the dose-response trend remained linear and unmistakable. These findings point to immune exhaustion, IgG4 dominance, and secondary immunodeficiency following repeated mRNA exposure — consistent with vaccine-acquired immune dysregulation (VAIDS). Apparent reductions in Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) and Pertussis are almost certainly statistical artifacts driven by healthy-user bias, diagnostic-coding overlap, and case misclassification. Crucially, the study’s national ARIMAX time-series revealed a 46-fold surge in confirmed pertussis cases across Korea during 2023, directly contradicting any notion of real-world protection. Because the “control” group included single-dose recipients, the true increase relative to the completely unvaccinated population is likely even greater than reported. Across an entire national dataset, each additional COVID-19 “vaccine” dose corresponded to a higher probability of non-COVID respiratory infection — most severely among children. This study reveals that COVID-19 “vaccines” have eroded immune function across an entire country — and likely the entire globe.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨VAIDS Explains Why EIGHT Studies Show mRNA Booster Shots Dramatically increase Infection Risk 1️⃣Dorr et al - Study of 1,745 healthcare workers finds mRNA boosters raise risk of influenza-like illness (flu, COVID, other viruses) by up to 70% and increase workdays lost by 50%. https://t.co/pyobkRdx6m

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 5:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize our peer‑reviewed re‑analysis of the largest vaxxed vs unvaxxed birth cohort: vaccinated children are sicker across all 22 chronic diseases. Increases: 1254%, 180%, 54%, 1120%, 810%, 803%, 696%, 553%, 412%, 386%, 216%, 128%, 26%, 250%. Observed only in vaccinated: ADHD, Diabetes, Brain dysfunction, Behavioral, Learning, Intellectual disability, Tics, Other psychological. Bottom line: 22/22 worse in vaccinated. CDC’s 81‑dose schedule linked.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the LARGEST vaxxed vs. unvaxxed birth cohort study in HISTORY shows vaccinated children are FAR sicker across ALL 22 chronic diseases. 1. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Cancer: 📈 +54% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children (ZERO cases in unvaccinated): 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Bottom line: 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were worse in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions. The CDC’s 81-dose hyper-vaccination schedule is driving the modern epidemics of chronic disease and autism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the original study relied heavily on statistical modeling, rather than presenting basic raw proportions. When they examined the raw proportions, they found that every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. The speaker notes that the study claimed there was no difference in cancer, treating cancer as a control, but asserts there was a difference in cancer when looking at raw data. They claim that for rare outcomes, the modeling used in the study is not very reliable, and no basic proportional analysis was performed by the original authors. However, when they conducted such an analysis themselves, they found cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. The speaker concludes that there is biological plausibility behind these findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what we did was we looked at the raw numbers, right? So the original study, they did so much modeling, like statistical models, and we really didn't see just the raw proportions between the groups. When we looked at the raw proportions, it was every single, all 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated. All 22 including cancer. Really? Because I mean, they said in the study it kind of uses cancer as the control, saying there was no difference in cancer, and you're saying there was a difference in cancer. Yes, so when it comes to rare outcomes, the modeling they use, you know, it's not very reliable, and so they didn't do any basic proportional analysis, but when we did that and we looked, cancer was fifty four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. So they had fifty four percent more cases and, you know, this is explained biologically. There is biological plausibility behind it.

@stopvaccinating - Larry Cook

Vax vs Unvax studies gives us answers that pediatricians, vaccine makers and mainstream media abhor: The unvaccinated children are healthier in every possible way. This is why these psychopaths want every child force vaccinated - to make this signal go away. https://t.co/v56mR2XdYR

Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:55 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨STUDY: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Cell Phone Radiation More Than TRIPLES Risk of Neurodevelopmental Delays in Infants Babies in high-EMF homes were up to 3.7× more likely to suffer motor, problem-solving & social delays. Imagine what 6G will do.

Video Transcript AI Summary
They literally went into the rooms. They went into these babies' rooms, in over 50 households. They literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. That accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi-Fi. All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. So this wasn't because they were born too early. They accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was they literally went in the rooms. Right? They went in these babies' rooms, like, over 50 households. Right? And they literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. Right? And so that accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi Fi. Right? All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high m EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. Right? So this wasn't because they were born too early. Right? They they accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It wasn't because of that. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump just signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/m2z0YVTiyF

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

Read this carefully. The federal government openly states that 6G will enable AI, robotics, and implantable technologies tied directly to national security and economic policy. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s policy. Ask yourself: Who controls the network and who becomes the node?

Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nic Hulscher claimed flu shots are a “DISASTROUS FAILURE” that raise dementia by 38% and Alzheimer's by 50%, citing a 13.3 million-person study and claims of a decade-long risk, plus a Cleveland Clinic finding of −27% flu vaccine effectiveness for 2024–25. He shared links to articles titled: “Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia/Alzheimer’s” and “Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu.”

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Flu shots are a DISASTROUS FAILURE — they increase your risk of dementia (+38%), Alzheimer's (+50%), AND the flu (+27%). The single LARGEST vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) found common vaccines dose-dependently increase risk of dementia and Alzheimer's for a FULL DECADE. A major Cleveland Clinic study (n=53,402) found −27% flu shot effectiveness during 2024–25 flu season.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript reports that the largest single study on vaccines and dementia, involving over thirteen million people, found that vaccinated adults who received flu shots and pneumococcal shots faced a 50% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease and a 38% increased risk of dementia. It is claimed that the risk increased the more doses participants received, with individuals who lined up to receive more flu shots over the years experiencing the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and that the risk persisted for more than ten years. The narrative states that once a person receives many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia, and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. Additionally, the transcript asserts that not only does the flu shot not work, according to colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic, but flu shots increase the risk of flu by 27%. It concludes by saying that flu shots, in addition to increasing flu risk, appear to increase the risk of dementia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The largest single study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia with over thirteen million people in it found that vaccinated adults who got flu shots and pneumococcal shots, they faced a fifty percent increased risk of Alzheimer's and a thirty eight percent increased risk of dementia. And the risk increased the more doses they got. So they started to get more flu shots that they lined up every year to get it. Unfortunately, they faced the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and the risk persisted for over ten years. And so it it appears, you know, once you receive so many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. So not only now do we know that the flu shot doesn't work according to and colleagues out of the Cleveland Clinic, flu shots increase your risk of flu by twenty seven percent. So not only do they do that, but now it appears that they increase your risk of dementia, which is absolutely terrible.

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

RFK Jr. warns: "In a million years, I would not take the flu shot - and I'll tell you why."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues against the flu shot, citing Cochrane and BMJ. He says: people who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu, but they’re four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. He contends that after vaccination you might get sick, not from flu but from something indistinguishable from flu, because the flu shot gives you pathogenic priming that injures your immune system and makes you more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. He references a Pentagon story, citing Wolfe (January), stating the flu shot not only primes for flu but primes for coronavirus. In the study, they had a placebo group and a vaccine group to test prophylaxis against coronavirus for military readiness, and they found people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus. He claims this is not an isolated finding, saying six other major studies report the same thing. Regarding longevity, he references Cochrane’s point about what has happened to longevity in the elderly since flu shot mandates began for elderly people, saying life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferation increased. He adds an observational note about the COVID vaccine period: “during the COVID crisis” there’s no science on this, but observationally, it tended to be people who got their flu shots—nursing home residents who receive flu shots and first responders who get flu shots are implicated. Speaker 1 interruptions: asks for clarification, saying, “with all due respect, I don’t understand the implications of your position. If you’re right, why wouldn’t it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it’s criminal.” Speaker 0 responds with a partial cut-off fragment, beginning to reply with “to” and then stopping.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a million years I would not take the flu shot and I'll tell you why, because this is what Cochrane and BMJ have found. People who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu. They're four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. And you might find, and a lot of people do, that they get the flu shot and then they get sick. They're usually not getting the flu, they're getting something that is indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the Pentagon published a story and you can cite this, it's by Wolfe, w o l f e, in January, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. If you get, they gave flu, they had a placebo group and they had a vaccine group because they wanted for many military readiness to see if the flu shot was prophylactic against coronavirus. What they found is actually the people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus and that's not a, that's not a lone study. We found six other major studies that say the same thing. If you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get coronavirus. You know, all you have to do, Alan, and this is what Cochrane said, is look what's happened to longevity in the elderly since we started mandating the flu shot to elderly people. Those are the people, life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferated. And if you see, you know, the people who died during the COVID vaccine, the COVID crisis, and there's no science on this, but it's observational, it tended to be people who got their flu shots, people who were in nursing home who will all get flu shots, people who are first responders who get flu So Speaker 1: with all due respect, I don't understand the implications of your position. If you're right, why wouldn't it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it's criminal Speaker 0: to

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s. https://thefocalpoints.com/p/study-common-vaccines-linked-to-38 STUDY: Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-flu-vaccination-linked

STUDY: Common Vaccines Linked to 38-50% Increased Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s The single largest vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) finds risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after flu and pneumococcal shots. thefocalpoints.com
NEW STUDY - Flu Vaccination Linked to 27% Increased Risk of Flu Major Cleveland Clinic study finds −26.9% effectiveness for influenza vaccine during the 2024–2025 respiratory viral season. thefocalpoints.com
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump just signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/m2z0YVTiyF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Six gs earlier, which is around 2030. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About six gs earlier, which is around 2,000 '30. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

Read this carefully. The federal government openly states that 6G will enable AI, robotics, and implantable technologies tied directly to national security and economic policy. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s policy. Ask yourself: Who controls the network and who becomes the node? https://t.co/MtlWFxHH5G

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 12:13 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Over 900 studies show vitamin D exhibits potent anti-cancer effects across MOST cancers. Wide-scale vitamin D supplementation could prevent 30,000 cancer deaths per year in a SINGLE country. Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable. https://t.co/5KxUNJ0Gb4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vitamin D alone could prevent about 30,000 cancer deaths in a single country in a single year. The study looked in Germany and examined what would happen if they administered wide-scale vitamin D to the 50 and older population. Based on the most recent meta-analyses of vitamin D and cancer, there is about a 13% reduction in cancer mortality, and that is extrapolated to an entire country, resulting in saving about 30,000 lives per year. A recent paper on vitamin D and cancer and its biological effects is highlighted: there are over 900 peer-reviewed recent papers finding that vitamin D, when raised to adequate levels, exhibits anticancer activity against literally basically every single cancer known, through vitamin D receptor signaling as well as tumor microenvironment control and immune modulation. This is described as very, very important as winter months approach, so ensuring adequate vitamin D intake is advised. The speaker notes that some of the most powerful cancer prevention tools are neither profitable nor novel, and vitamin D is very inexpensive, biologically active, and, according to randomized clinical trial evidence, saves lives at scale. The main question posed is why public health agencies are ignoring this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vitamin d alone could prevent thirty thousand cancer deaths in a single country in a single year. Specifically, this study looked in Germany. They looked at what would happen if they administered wide scale vitamin d to the 50 and older population. And based on the most recent meta analyses of vitamin d and cancer, does show about a thirteen percent reduction in cancer mortality. And so that is extrapolated to an entire country. You save about thirty thousand lives per year. And we also have to remember a recent paper came out looking at vitamin d and cancer and its biological effects. There's over 900 peer reviewed papers, recent peer reviewed papers, finding that vitamin d, when you raise it to adequate levels, exhibits anticancer activity against literally, basically every single cancer known through vitamin d receptor signaling as well as tumor microenvironment control and immune modulation. So this is very, very important as we reach the winter months. You want to ensure you have adequate vitamin d intake. Some of the most powerful cancer prevention tools are neither profitable nor novel, and vitamin d is very inexpensive, biologically active, and according to randomized clinical trial evidence, saves lives at scale. The main question now remains is why are public health agencies ignoring this?

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Vitamin D Could Prevent 30,000 Cancer Deaths Per Year in Germany Alone Over 900 studies show anti-cancer activity of vitamin D across most cancer types, and randomized controlled trials demonstrate a ~13% reduction in cancer mortality. Cancers with demonstrated benefit include: • Breast • Prostate • Colorectal • Lung • Brain (glioblastoma) • Melanoma • Ovarian • Bladder • Head & neck • Multiple myeloma Effects are mediated through vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment control. If adults aged 50+ received routine vitamin D supplementation at modest daily doses: ➡️ ~30,000 lives saved per year (Germany alone) ➡️ ~322,000 life-years gained annually ➡️ ~$280 million in net healthcare savings per year ➡️ Cost: ~$11–$55 per person annually Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable.

Saved - December 23, 2025 at 6:37 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Why Some People Are Not Harmed by COVID-19 "Vaccination" Some batches cause mass injury and death. Others are harmless duds. 🔥 Hot lots: DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, heavy metals 🧊 Dud lots: Degraded. Inactive. Multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm: batch determines fate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. The early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly. Thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's now four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. We're actually the early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. And, yes, some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events. Some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Since batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 mRNA injections has been demonstrated, checking your batch can be a useful tool to help predict possible long-term adverse events: https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html

Site not found · GitHub Pages knollfrank.github.io

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

The Safety of COVID-19 'Vaccines' is Batch-Dependent Epidemiologist @NicHulscher explains with @chriswerge Full Episode: https://youtu.be/zx0I8ku81tI?si=C2z7l3Ixkr9s87VT #MFScholar

Video Transcript AI Summary
These batches are different. So yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch. And you can check your batch at howbadismybatch.com, which uses the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many reports of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These batches are different. So Yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The the quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch, and you can check your batch at how bad is mybatch.com, which uses the vaccine adverse events reporting system, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many, how many reports of of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 9:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that vitamin D shows anti-cancer activity across most cancers. About 900 studies and trials show ~13% lower cancer mortality. Benefits include breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, brain glioblastoma, melanoma, ovarian, bladder, head & neck, and multiple myeloma, via VDR signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment. For adults 50+, modest daily supplementation could save ~30,000 German lives/year, gain ~322,000 life-years, and save ~$280M, at ~$11–$55/person/year.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Vitamin D Could Prevent 30,000 Cancer Deaths Per Year in Germany Alone Over 900 studies show anti-cancer activity of vitamin D across most cancer types, and randomized controlled trials demonstrate a ~13% reduction in cancer mortality. Cancers with demonstrated benefit include: • Breast • Prostate • Colorectal • Lung • Brain (glioblastoma) • Melanoma • Ovarian • Bladder • Head & neck • Multiple myeloma Effects are mediated through vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling, immune modulation, and tumor microenvironment control. If adults aged 50+ received routine vitamin D supplementation at modest daily doses: ➡️ ~30,000 lives saved per year (Germany alone) ➡️ ~322,000 life-years gained annually ➡️ ~$280 million in net healthcare savings per year ➡️ Cost: ~$11–$55 per person annually Some of the most powerful cancer-prevention tools are neither novel nor profitable.

Saved - December 16, 2025 at 9:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A 12-day, small study reports resveratrol plus copper in glioblastoma reduced tumor proliferation, chromatin debris, immune checkpoints, and cancer stemness, while reprogramming gene expression and promoting tumor death; larger RCTs are urged. An oncologist notes GBM's aggressiveness, potential to complement standard therapy, and explains mechanisms (pro-oxidant effects, cfChP degradation) and cautions on dosing; dietary sources and copper role are discussed; more trials needed.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨NEW STUDY: Resveratrol and Copper Trigger System-Level Collapse of Human Glioblastoma Aggressiveness in Just 12 Days In one of the deadliest human cancers, cheap nutraceuticals suppressed tumor growth, shut down 9 cancer hallmarks, and triggered tumor self-destruction⬇️ Human glioblastoma patients received resveratrol (5.6 mg) plus copper (560 ng) four times daily for an average of just ~12 days before tumor resection. Tumor tissue was then compared with untreated controls. They found: ✅Near-elimination of tumor-promoting chromatin debris (cfChPs) ✅A ~31% reduction in tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67) ✅Suppression of NINE core hallmarks of cancer ✅Simultaneous down-regulation of SIX immune checkpoints ✅Significant loss of cancer stem cell markers ✅Large-scale reprogramming of tumor gene expression ✅Activation of organized, intrinsic tumor cell death with efficient cleanup This is not a marginal signal. It's a coordinated, system‑level biological shift in one of the deadliest cancers known. Longer trials are urgently needed to determine whether prolonged treatment could improve clinical outcomes.

@DrHariOncoAI - Dr Harishankar | Surgery × AI

As an oncologist, this resveratrol-copper study for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is intriguing, potentially complementing standard therapies like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. GBM is highly aggressive, with median survival of 12-18 months and 5-year survival ~5%. This short pre-surgical trial shows biological promise, but larger RCTs are essential for clinical validation. - 🦀GBM's Deadliness: Rapidly invasive brain tumor spreading aggressively, resisting treatments, impacting cognition, mobility, and daily function. Early intervention and innovations critical, but standard care foundational. - ⚛️Resveratrol's Mechanism of Action: Antioxidant that scavenges free radicals; inhibits cell proliferation via cyclin blockade; induces apoptosis (programmed cell death); anti-inflammatory; anti-angiogenic (blocks tumor blood supply). With copper in GBM, acts as pro-oxidant, generating radicals to degrade cell-free chromatin particles (cfChPs), reducing proliferation and immune evasion. - Biochemical Properties: Stilbenoid polyphenol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene); it's actually the plant's defense against fungi; potent antioxidant/anti-inflammatory; activates sirtuins (type of protein involved in regulating cellular ageing and death of cells and their resistance to stress) for longevity. - 🍇Best Natural Sources: Red grapes, especially muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) over common (Vitis vinifera); also blueberries, cranberries, tangerines—consume handful daily for natural boost. - Part of Fruit with Highest Concentration: Skin (primary); seeds secondary—eat whole fruits (skin on) or via red wine (skin-fermented). - Boosting Absorption: Usually with minute dose of piperine (black pepper) to inhibit breakdown; fats (yogurt, olive oil) for uptake; nano-formulations or quercetin (onions/apples) for synergy. Consult doctor; high doses may cause GI issues. - Copper's Role in Cancer-Killing with Resveratrol: Essential mineral but tumor-exploited for growth; this combo flips to pro-oxidant, producing radicals to destroy cfChPs, downregulating cancer stemness and checkpoints. It's like converting ally to assassin; dosing data needed to prevent toxicity. - 🥦Dietary Sources of Copper: Shellfish (oysters), nuts/seeds (cashews, sunflower), liver, dark chocolate, whole grains, leafy greens—meets adult needs (~900 mcg/day) without supplements unless deficient; excess risks liver damage. - Need for Larger RCTs: Small, 12-day study is proof-of-concept; require big, long-term trials (hundreds of patients) for outcomes, safety, and chemo integration—don't abandon proven treatments; discuss nutraceuticals with oncologist.

@_Jonathan_Quick - John Quick

I just sat down with @Lexie_Official on Stories Worth Hearing. We talked about how she first got into music, the artists who shaped her sound, her creative process, and how she pulls from real-life stories and emotions when writing songs. We also talked about her new Christmas album, Merry Lexmas, available on @Spotify @SpotifyUSA!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lexi, a singer-songwriter blending pop, country, and acoustic storytelling, shares her unconventional path into music. She explains that her entry was almost accidental: she was a dancer and theater student, joined a girl band after an audition, moved to London, and found herself immersed in the pop world with Warner. She describes the early six months signed with Warner as sleepless and surreal, followed by two years in a girly electro-pop band that didn’t fully fit her. This led her to pursue an independent route, learning to navigate industry dynamics and realizing that labels and managers can elevate but don’t magically transform a career. Her core realization: she thrives on storytelling and personal heartbreak, and she prefers turning real-life moments into art. When describing her decision to go independent, Lexi notes the band’s creative arc ended around the same time Little Mix rose to prominence, making mainstream competition intense. She emphasizes that she wasn’t herself in that environment and spent the last decade finding her authentic sound—rooted in soul, country, and storytelling. She loves turning painful moments into songs and believes that personal experience fuels her strongest work. Her creative process varies: in Nashville, she collaborates; in Dubai, she often writes solo and then takes rough ideas to the UK studio for refinement. She highlights that some songs come from a single moment or a conversation with a writing partner that sparks an entire track. What keeps her going includes a mix of resilience and practical changes. She acknowledges the emotional ups and downs of artistry but stresses the importance of continuing to create and improve, even during heartbreak. A pivotal factor in her current stability is moving to Dubai, where she found financial freedom that allows her to invest in production and timing. She describes Dubai as providing opportunities for emerging talent, with experiences singing for brands like Gucci, Sephora, Jack Daniels, Google, Kiehl, and Killian in Paris. This financial flexibility enables her to complete projects quickly, such as her Christmas album produced in three weeks. Lexi also details her approach to the Christmas album, which began as a creative experiment with AI tools. After being introduced to AI, she experimented with a Suno-driven process to reimagine songs. She produced a full album in three weeks using AI for production, while all vocal recordings remained real. The project features collaborations with local and international artists, including Red (on tour with Andrea Bocelli), plus guests from the UK and Dubai. The album is described as eclectic, with versions ranging from country to soulful and pop-flavored takes on classic songs; songs include her own interpretations of River by Joni Mitchell and a reimagined Country Roads. For aspiring artists, Lexi offers blunt advice: be prepared to fight, face rejection, and endure repeated “no” before hearing yes. She urges relentless self-improvement and maintaining discipline, even during personal hardship, noting that staying active—working out, writing, and producing—helps move past negative times. Her long-term goal is world-class recognition for her originals and touring worldwide, with a dream of her music someday appearing in romantic comedies. She confirms new music is on the way, with more releases planned after the Christmas album; a January push is anticipated. She invites listeners to check out the Christmas album and her broader catalog through the podcast link.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Stories Worth Hearing. I am your host, John Quick. On today's episode, I am joined by Lexi, a singer songwriter whose music blends pop, country, and acoustic influences with a strong focus on storytelling. We talk about how she first got into music, the artists who have influenced her sound, her creative process, and the advice she would give to someone just starting out. Lexi also has a new Christmas album out now. You can check it out, buy it, or download it using the link in the podcast description. I am glad you are here. Let's get into it. Speaker 1: Well, Lexi, welcome to the show. I'm super excited to hear this would be fun to chat with you. Speaker 2: Nice to meet you. Speaker 1: Nice Well, to meet be So we'll talk a little bit about your new Christmas album here in a little bit, but first tell me about how did you get into music in the first place? What inspired you to kind of dip your toes in this industry? It's, it's probably a ruthless at times industry, but you're here, you're in it. What inspired you to get involved? Speaker 2: It was a bit of an accident, to be honest. I was always musically inclined and I was dancing and studying theater. And in my second year of theater school, they basically ran an audition for a girl band and I did it and I got it. And so it was just like a surreal experience. I was at performing arts college, I was gooey eyed and 17 years old and they moved me to London and I was thrust into the pop world completely clueless, but what an amazing experience. I mean, for like the first six months when I was first signed with Warner, I had an absolute insomnia because I was just like, what is life? I was like, pinch me, I was ringing my mom, was like, mom, they're paying me but at the minute they just told us to explore London and just hang out and I'm like, when are they gonna make us work? Like this is and it was just this most strange experience, and then so after that I had two years in a fab band, it was like a girly electro pop, and if I'm honest with myself looking back, was it really me? Probably not. Was it an incredible experience, good and bad, you know, I learned so much? Yes, and then I really went kind of down the independent route, which is a long and winding road, but you learn and you get this experience that helps you carry yourself into situations when you do come across big corporations again, realizing that record labels and managers, we have this idea that they can change our life with one thing and actually you get signed and you think this is the same as what I was doing myself, so it's a lot, of course they have major connections, they do, and if you get a really great manager and label that's really excited about your project, then of course they can elevate you a lot, but there's a lot to be said about learning to do as much as you can on your own and being as self sufficient as you can, because waiting for people is a pain in the ass. Speaker 1: Yeah, so tell me about that decision, take me back to that day where you're signed to Warner, you're in this band, it's, you know, probably touring all around and then you decide to go independent. What was the kind of differentiating factor that made you want to go independent as opposed to keeping with a huge ginormous record label? Speaker 2: At that time it wasn't really a choice. I think the band ran its course. It was like, it was a strange time where we were actually doing really well. We were touring. We supported Saturdays, I don't know if you guys would remember them, but we were doing some awesome, awesome things, but it was the same time that Little Mix won The X Factor, and there was a band called Stooshie that did this, it had a rude name, but it went viral because it was so shocking and it was like, you know, you can't compete with, back then, was like, I'm gonna make myself sound old, it was like ten years ago, but back then you couldn't compete with the numbers you could get by going on the X Factor, if that makes sense. Little Mix came through X Factor and they were doing a similar vibe to what we'd been doing for the past two years. It just ran its course, and I am so grateful. We had a great experience, but I think that I wasn't myself in that environment, to be honest, and the last ten years has been me really learning about who I am and my sound and I know that sounds so cheesy but I've come full circle. I've always loved soul, I've loved country, I love storytelling, you know, so many times in this industry people are like, yeah, no, that's not going to work, that's not going to work, and it's like, do you know what, anything can fricking work if you want, if that's what you enjoy and that's what you want to do. So many people, oh yeah, just do dance, yeah, of course, I can sing on a dance record, but I don't love that music, I don't get excited to make it, I get excited to tell stories about my real heartbreaks and trials and tribulations and happy moments, like that's where I get my joy and that's what makes me keep doing it, is when I turn a moment in my life, especially if it's painful, into a piece of art, that's where I get my buzz. You know, I have friends where they love to sing, their buzz is literally from singing live and riffing and high notes and killing it that way. For me, it's like I've just bled onto the page, into the song, my story. That's, that's what I love about doing it. Speaker 1: So what keeps you going? Cause my guess is you put a lot of time, effort, work, blood, sweat, and tears into this. Speaker 2: I'm mooting. Speaker 1: Most people, yeah, most people give up. Most people try once or twice. And if they don't become quote unquote successful, then they just kind of go do something else. What's kept you in it and with the amount of drive that you have every day to wake up and go after this dream of yours? Speaker 2: I think there definitely are a few factors like the, obviously the same old badger that everyone says, you've really got to love it, stick it out. Yeah, you have got to love it, but the reality is, and ask most artists, do we love it every single day? No, it's emotional journey, you know what I mean? There's some days you love, some days you can't think of anything, some days you're blocked, some days you're lazy, so like, but in the end I just, well some days I think what else would I do? What else would I do? What would it be like a wedding planner or something? Also, to be honest, moving to Dubai was a game changer because obviously I don't like to delve too much into financials, but for example, when I was living in London, I was working hella hard and I was scraping by and I would spare spend every spare penny on a song. And I was trying to get mates rates so I could still pay for my car and my rent. And it was scrape, scrape, scrape, scrape, scrape. In COVID I accidentally got a gig on new year's eve in Dubai. I just stayed and I just, there was nothing to go home for at that time. The weather was. And then, you know, no one could work. We were all out of work. We were all at home. And I was like, hold on. I might as well just stay and enjoy the sunshine. And basically, in that time that I just stayed and enjoyed the sunshine, I networked my ass off, I made friends and when Dubai opened back up again, lo and behold, I went into pretty much full time work and it has been life changing. Like I've been here now on New Year's Eve five years exactly, and I've just bought my second beachfront apartment. Thank you. No, thank you. And I don't say that to brag, I say it to show that like the quality of living and the opportunity here is vast, it is great and you know opportunities that for example if you were in America or in UK would go to a pop star, already established pop star, shall we say, in Dubai those opportunities go for emerging talent and you know since being here I've been able to sing for Gucci, Sephora, Jack Daniels, Google, Kiehl, Killian in Paris, and it's like when I think about if I was in London, would that be me or would that be, you know, the big, big stars that are already kind of big names? So that's the excitement here is waking up and thinking anything could happen, but at the same time obviously I sometimes do feel a bit disconnected from The UK and America because I know like obviously the music scenes there are really consolidated and it's very new here, so I do get over there, over to The States kind of two or three times a year if I can to just kind of enjoy Nashville, immerse myself into the scene and connect and you know all the good stuff, so I try to be in both to really absorb and inspire myself with both. Sorry, all that to say, you said, keeps me going? Obviously, sorry, I told you I'd ramble on. Obviously the financial freedom that I have given myself since being in Dubai has made my musical journey more enjoyable. Okay, so like that's not to say I've got unlimited money to just go, go, go, but if I want to finish a song and I want to finish it quick, I can afford to pay my producer. Know, if I want to, I decided to make the Christmas album in three weeks. Obviously I was on a bit of a budget because there were so many songs, connections here and I made it happen, you know, for a decent amount. And I was able to, you know, for example, the money wasn't a block, like, oh, I can't afford it. I was just able to do what I wanted to do. So people might say you don't need it, but I'm sorry. It really helps. Speaker 1: Walk me through a little bit about that process as it relates to your songs. Speaker 2: That is my most inspired stage is when I've been through an experience. Obviously, do write other times in my life as well, but when I am heartbroken it just floods, it literally floods and it can be in any form, sometimes it's a title or something I want to say. Like I remember, for example, last time I was in Nashville, I came and I was absolutely heartbroken and I was catching up with my girlfriend who I write with quite a lot and I told her this whole story about this guy and she just went, Lex, it's his loss and I went, that's today's song and then we just went upstairs, sat by the pool with the guitars and we wrote his loss and it was literally the song became the conversation with my mate and I think that is my style. I think my skill is saying things in a way that so many women and guys but like you know so many of us experience these things and these kind of treatments and these moments in our life and you know, I just say them really raw and real and people are like, yeah, that happened to me too, and I love that, I love when women reach out and they're like, oh my God, I've been through the same, that's what I get so much joy from. I mean, other times I collaborate, other times I'm on my own, I don't have one given way that I create, I change it all the time, as I say, when I'm in Nashville, I do a lot of collaboration, when I'm in Dubai, it does tend to be kind of me coming up with an idea, often it'll be very rough and then I'll take it into the studio with some of my trusted guys back in The UK. So it changes every single time. Speaker 1: What kind of advice would you give to folks that are maybe just starting off? A lot of folks that listen to this podcast are kind of starting off into, into their own entrepreneurial world. Maybe it's, you know, becoming a singer songwriter or open an e commerce store. A lot of them on the, are on the front end of their journey. So what kind of advice would you give to folks that are starting out in the music industry and listening to this today? Speaker 2: Get ready to fight and to be tough and to be shoved down and to be ignored. And for all your best friends to not share your stuff or to not support until you're already famous. It's the tale as old as time. It's going to be no, no, no, no, no, no, no, and you just got to be, as I say, relentless until you get that yes, and all the time in the meantime, you keep making yourself better, and this is what I say to my girlfriends, even when I'm in breakups or, you know, not to go too deep into like mental health, but I think we all have our times where we're down and we feel deflated and then other times we're inspired and motivated. My biggest advice is regardless of where you're at mentally, do the good stuff, do the good stuff, and so if I'm heartbroken I still work out, even though I feel dead inside sometimes. I remember the last breakup, I felt empty inside but I thought, you know what, when I come out of this in two months time, I'm gonna be better. I'm gonna be fitter, I'm gonna be wiser, I'm gonna have written more songs, I'm gonna have done all that good stuff and lo and behold, when you finally come out, you thank your past self for doing them positive things and that's kind of where I'm at at the minute is my discipline has got to a level now and I'm really pleased with myself and especially during making productivity and discipline has levelled up in the last couple of months and I'm so happy because I've kind of weeded out that procrastination time and I'm just getting on with it and actually when you get into that state, like there's a vibe, there's a vibration going on there and you get rolling in that state and good things start to come. So I can't, I don't know how to explain it, but. Speaker 1: That's awesome. So you just released a Christmas album. Talk to me a little bit about this album for folks listening in. I think you can get it on Spotify and probably everywhere you could find music. But talk to me a little bit about this album and why you, you know, it was time for a Christmas album. Speaker 2: Well, classic, partly psychotic legacy. So it was like the November 5 and one of my friends kind of introduced me to the AI world and I was like, you know, maybe I should start to play and try to get into the future because I'm really not a computer girl. I'm very much a go out there, live life, write about my stories and my experiences, I'm not one to sit down and figure things out on the laptop, but it kind of showed me a bit and I thought, let me mess around and make a few versions of stuff. So, I actually got booked for a fabulous gig in South Africa where they wanted me to do country songs and one of the songs they wanted was Country Roads, but I kind of got this John Denver backing track and I was like, this is not punching for me and it's not in my key and even when I change the key it's not sounding right, so I thought, right, let me play around. Anyway, my gosh, I put it into this app, Suno, and I swear I made like the Super Bowl version of Country Roads. Speaker 1: Nice. Speaker 2: I was like, this is cool. And so I actually got excited and passionate to kind of immerse myself into using it more and just like really pushing the boundaries of what I could do without relying on someone else, if that makes sense. So early November, did a version of River by Joni Mitchell, which is just a lovely song that not many people actually know, but I love. And I created this fab version and I don't know what came over me. I just thought, oh, maybe I should just do a whole album in three weeks and document the whole thing. And that's what I did. I just went full turbo, made a full album in three weeks, all on AI, not the voices, all the voices is real recordings, real artists, but all the production is AI created. And then I just collaborated with loads of local artists, some international overseas, we've got Red on there, she's a bit of an international superstar now, she's been on tour with Andrea Bocelli, she's getting quite well known around the world, she's quite big on TikTok, got some celebs in The UK, some local talent in Dubai and you know what, it was just the most joyous experience. I was locked in this room for three weeks straight and I just had the best time of my life. People popping in, got an Italian singer on, she came round with cookies, My girl from Vegas, she came round, she's on a song. It was just, it was random. I don't know what made me do it, but I just did it. But now, I'm so proud of the creation. I'm, maybe this is like, I'm not meant to say this, but I've been listening to it myself. I really like it. Because I just picked all my favorite songs and made like cool, like, pop soulful country versions of them. Some of them are more country. Some of them are soulful. Like, it's really eclectic. So, yeah, I don't know what made me do it. Just did. Speaker 1: It's awesome. So Speaker 2: And it's out. Speaker 1: Let's pretend it's ten years from now. What's your ultimate goal? What's your, you know, what could you, what is it in your mind where you could look back and say, okay, I made it. Is there something out there that, you know, ten years from now you want to be at this peak or that chart or whatever? Speaker 2: Yeah. World domination. No, I'm joking. I'm joking. Do you know what? I just want, I just want my music to be appreciated and celebrated worldwide, and I want to be performing it worldwide. Like a lot of singers, I have to do all kinds of gigs to make my bread and butter money and keep the dream alive, and I pump the money I earn from that into the dream. But you know what? Everyone that sees me sing my original music, she's like, found so much better when you do your original music. I just love singing my songs. I just wanna sing my just wanna sing my songs every day. And I want people to listen and care. Yeah. I just yeah. I'd love I'd love love love to be touring around, doing my originals. I want my originals in those romantic comedies. I love a good cheesy chick flick. So, I'm just waiting for Colin Farrell to call and say he's gonna put my song over his next movie or Speaker 1: Nice. Hey, you never know, right? Well, it's been fun chatting with you. Twenty minutes here has gone by enough. Flash, Lexi, do you have any last minute thoughts here before we head off? Speaker 2: Yeah. Just an apology because I talk so much. No. I guess there'll be new music coming soon as well. I mean, I've just, obviously, I've put out the Christmas album, so you'll better be rocking around the Christmas tree to that this Christmas. But I'm gonna be coming with new stuff in January and onwards. Speaker 1: Awesome. Well, we'll put, for folks listening in the, a link to the music is in the podcast description. Go check it out. Go go buy or download all of our music. Lexi, you're welcome back anytime. Thanks so much for coming on the show. We hope you have a great rest of your day. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.
Saved - December 13, 2025 at 5:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Just presented irrefutable evidence for immediate market withdrawal of mRNA shots to a certain state governor’s office, alongside many brave scientists and physicians. It appears to have been successful. A multi-state push for a moratorium on mRNA is now underway.

Saved - December 13, 2025 at 6:30 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Over 100 Studies Show That High-Dose Vitamin C Kills Cancer Cells Through: 1. Pro-oxidative tumor killing 2. Epigenetic reprogramming 3. Suppression of oncogenic signaling 4. Immune activation Human trials already show IV vitamin C can shrink tumors and improve survival. https://t.co/s0WPtoiI1y

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses promising results for high dose vitamin C in cancer treatment. A recent study on high dose vitamin C shows so much promise, and there have already been human trials underway in which patients who received high dose vitamin C did have drastically improved outcomes: they lived longer and they had less symptoms from the chemo. Mechanistically, the vitamin C literally wipes out the cancer cells via, like, four distinct very strong mechanisms. The speaker also notes that it is very safe as well. In addition, the speaker mentions other natural cancer therapies: ivermectin, fenbendazole, and now dandelion root extract, stating that all of these show extreme promise for natural cancer treatments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A recent study came out looking at high dose vitamin c for cancer, and this shows so much promise. Not only has there already been human trials under underway in which patients who received high dose vitamin C did have drastically improved outcomes. They lived longer and they had less symptoms from the chemo. But mechanistically, the vitamin C literally wipes out the cancer cells via, like, four distinct very strong mechanisms. And we know it's very safe as well. So a high dose vitamin C, ivermectin, fenbendazole, now we have dandelion root extract. All of these show extreme promise for natural cancer treatments.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨NEW STUDY: High-Dose Vitamin C Is a Potent Anti-Cancer Agent DECADES of evidence reveal that vitamin C attacks cancer through four powerful mechanisms: pro-oxidative cytotoxicity, epigenetic reprogramming, signaling-pathway suppression, and immune activation. A MASSIVE new paper in Genes & Diseases analyzed 150+ studies and found that when vitamin C reaches true pharmacologic levels (20–30 mM), it behaves like a targeted, tumor-selective therapy — something past trials missed by under-dosing. The evidence base spans decades of laboratory, animal, and early-phase clinical research. Key findings ⬇️ ✅ At high doses, vitamin C becomes a cancer-killer — generating hydrogen peroxide bursts that destroy cancer cells while sparing healthy cells. ✅ Cancer cells are uniquely vulnerable due to excess iron, heavy vitamin C uptake, and weak antioxidant defenses. ✅ KRAS & BRAF mutant cancers are extremely sensitive — leading to metabolic collapse, dramatic shrinkage, and improved outcomes when high-dose IV vitamin C is added. ✅ Vitamin C shuts down the tumor “survival switch” (HIF-1α) — blocking blood-vessel growth, metastasis programs, and hypoxia-driven tumor survival. ✅ It reprograms cancer DNA — reversing abnormal methylation and reactivating tumor-suppressor genes through TET enzyme activation. ✅ It boosts anti-tumor immunity — more CD4+/CD8+ T cells, stronger NK and γδ T-cell activity, higher IL-12 & granzyme B, and enhanced response to PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy. ✅ Human trials already show real benefits — pancreatic tumor shrinkage, longer survival in glioblastoma, higher response rates in lung cancer, and lower chemo toxicity. ✅ Effective dosing is high: 75–100 g IV (or >1 g/kg), 2–3× per week — the level required to hit the true cancer-killing range. Bottom line: High-dose IV vitamin C is a multi-mechanism, tumor-targeting anti-cancer therapy that has been underestimated for decades — and now deserves modern Phase III trials.

Saved - December 12, 2025 at 7:38 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID-19 mRNA injections can cause sudden death years after injection by permanently damaging the heart with lethal micro-scars. Our study is the first to fully define the syndrome known as "COVID-19 vaccine-induced cardiac arrest"👇 https://t.co/9pYqqJ5sE3

Video Transcript AI Summary
First, the mRNA is injected within lipid nanoparticles in your arm. It travels through every organ system, including the heart. There are two papers, one by Baumeyer and colleagues, one by Crosson and colleagues. Crosson found mRNA directly in the heart of deceased mRNA recipients. So we know it reaches the heart. Baumeyer found the spike protein directly in the heart in biopsies of patients with vaccine induced myocarditis. So we know the vaccine mRNA and lipid nanoparticles get into the heart, translate into spike proteins, so your cardiomyocytes begin to produce a toxic non human protein and your own body attacks the heart resulting in inflammation and cardiac scarring including micro scars which are undetectable with imaging. You can only detect it with a microscope, which is very disturbing. And so once you have this scarring, you're going to have cardiac electrical abnormalities, electrical conduction abnormalities, and your heart's not going to beat properly. Then when you go exercise, we found there's two triggers either during exercise or sports when there's exertion or during the morning waking hours of sleep. In these two periods of time, there's a surge in catecholamines including dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. And so during these times when you have this cardiac damage, you have this scarring, that's the trigger you do that leads to this vaccine induced cardiac arrest. And that's why we saw a lot of sudden deaths among athletes back in 2021.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First, the mRNA is injected within lipid nanoparticles in your arm. It travels through every organ system, including the heart. And there's two papers, one by Baumeyer and colleagues, one by Crosson and colleagues. Crosson found mRNA directly in the heart of deceased mRNA recipients. So we know it reaches the heart. Baumeyer found the spike protein directly in the heart in biopsies of patients with vaccine induced myocarditis. So we know the vaccine mRNA and lipid nanoparticles get into the heart, translate into spike proteins, so your cardiomyocytes begin to produce a toxic non human protein and your own body attacks the heart resulting in inflammation and cardiac scarring including micro scars which are undetectable with imaging. You can only detect it with a microscope, which is very disturbing. And so once you have this scarring, you're going to have cardiac electrical abnormalities, electrical conduction abnormalities, and your heart's not going to beat properly. Then when you go exercise, we found there's two triggers either during exercise or sports when there's exertion or during the morning waking hours of sleep. In these two periods of time, there's a surge in catecholamines including dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. And so during these times when you have this cardiac damage, you have this scarring, that's the trigger you do that leads to this vaccine induced cardiac arrest. And that's why we saw a lot of sudden deaths among athletes back in 2021.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - Covid mRNA injections can cause heart damage by triggering immune cells to go on the attack, scientists have found. https://t.co/Ou2ykeocex

Saved - December 11, 2025 at 2:36 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The new study that found Pfizer mRNA in over 88% of human placentas, sperm, blood — and in 50% of unvaccinated pregnant women — was just mysteriously DELETED from the journal. We are deeply investigating this serious matter and will report back as soon as we have an answer. https://t.co/xJIA67TGSW

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🚨URGENT:Recent study from Israel about Pfizer vaccine mRNA detected in vaccinated blood/placenta just deleted!! Something serious might have occurred, possibly involving significant influence or infiltration in the Journal after it gained global visibility? Only authors can clarify, so hopefully someone can reach out to them to find out what happened. An archived snapshot of the study is still available on Wayback for anyone who wants to download it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20251205172931/https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @NicHulscher

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🚨URGENT: New study from Israel, only accessible online today/pub date 15 Oct 2025, finds Pfizer vaccine mRNA detected in blood, placenta, sperm & seminal fluid of vaccinated/still detectable in 50% women >200 days last-dose indicating prolonged persistence in the body.

Saved - December 6, 2025 at 8:09 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Fauci and other top health officials used fake PCR case numbers (86% not real infections) to manufacture fear and justify mandating mRNA gene-therapy shots, lockdowns, and the “six-foot” social-distancing scam. With Fauci's autopen pardon TERMINATED, it's time for prosecutions. https://t.co/6KKDkmHezX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted, mention of an auto pen pardon, and Trump’s statement that those pardons might be revoked. The speaker asserts that this should be on the front page news of every major news organization. They reference the past four years and the lockdowns, stating that people’s lives were shattered, they lost their jobs, and they lost their livelihoods. This is linked to a claim that the foundation for these outcomes was a verifiably highly flawed test in which only fourteen percent represented true infection. The speaker calls for accountability and emphasizes that this cannot happen again, insisting that the issue must be discussed publicly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of a sudden now there's talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted as that may have been a auto pen pardon. And Trump just said they might revoke those pardons. So this should be on the front page news of every major news organization because the past four years, you know, we went through the lockdowns. People's lives were shattered. They lost their jobs. They lost their livelihoods. And it was all based on now a verifiably highly flawed test that in which only fourteen percent represented true infection. So, yeah, this should be on the front page news absolutely everywhere. And honestly, you know, there really should be a form of of accountability. And, you know, we have to start talking about this because this cannot happen again.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨REMINDER: Criminal Referral Requests Filed Against Fauci and Top COVID Officials in SEVEN States — Accused of Murder, Racketeering, Fraud, Abuse, Terrorism & More TWO county-level criminal investigations are already underway👇 👤 NAMED INDIVIDUALS: • Dr. Anthony Fauci • Dr. Francis Collins • Dr. Deborah Birx • Dr. Rochelle Walensky • Dr. Stephen Hahn • Dr. Cliff Lane • Dr. Robert Redfield • Dr. Peter Daszak • Dr. Ralph Baric • Dr. Rick Bright • Dr. Janet Woodcock • Dr. Peter Hotez ⚖️ ALLEGED CRIMES: • Murder / Involuntary Manslaughter / Negligent Homicide • Assault / Abuse / Coercion • Reckless Endangerment • Kidnapping / Forced Labor • Terrorism • Racketeering • Operating a Corrupt Organization The referrals were filed by Vires Law Group and are backed by detailed evidence—including testimony from hundreds of victims and families. They said that lethal hospital protocols, the denial of life-saving treatments, and systemic medical coercion led to widespread injury and death.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 2014, 300 scientists warned Anthony Fauci would start a global pandemic. Following the high-profile escape of three bugs from U.S. labs, these 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama, urging him to shut down Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function research. Obama issued a https://t.co/WiiBayPya0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses gain-of-function research, claiming that the purpose of taking a wild virus and making it more pathogenic is to develop a vaccine for those enhanced viruses, and that the real rationale is to develop bioweapons and then a defense to those bioweapons. They assert that Anthony Fauci received a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities and continued the work through 2014. The speaker states that in 2014 three of the bugs escaped in high-profile incidents from three different U.S. labs, describing these as really deadly bugs that escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. They claim that 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama asking him to shut down Fauci’s gain-of-function research, arguing that it was highly likely to start a global pandemic with this dangerous research. According to the speaker, Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of Fauci’s worst projects, but ultimately did not fully shut them down. Instead, the research was moved offshore to avoid White House scrutiny and the Cambridge Working Group, a group of scientists, as well as other officials. The speaker alleges that the major offshore location for this research included a Chinese lab run by the Chinese military, specifically naming the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, as part of the moved research, with other work relocated to Ukraine and the former Soviet state of Georgia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna take a wild virus and we're gonna make it more pathogenic, more virulent, more deadly, and then we're gonna develop a vaccine for that. And that was that's classic gain of function research. Why are they doing that? Why what is the rationale for them doing that? The only real rationale if you think about it is to develop bioweapons and then develop a defense to those bioweapons. So that's what they were doing. And Anthony Fauci was given a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities. He continued to do that to 2014. And that year, three of the bugs escaped. In high profile escapes from three different labs in The United States, really deadly bugs escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. And 300 scientists sent a letter to president Obama asking him to shut down anti Fauci's research on gain of function saying that it was highly likely that he would start a global pandemic with this kind of very dangerous research. And president Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci or ordered them shut. In the end, he really didn't shut them. He instead moved the research offshore where he would be out of the oversight of these troublesome scientists, the 300 scientists, a group that called itself the Cambridge Working Group, and of the and of White House officials. And the major lab offshore that they moved this research there were other ones too. They moved research to Ukraine, to this former Soviet state of Georgia. But some of the worst research, they moved to a Chinese lab that was run by the Chinese military, the Wuhan lab in Wuhan, know, in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.
Saved - December 6, 2025 at 5:30 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

"If adults won't go for the shots, then give them to babies." This was the real reason behind the pharma-captured ACIP adding the Hepatitis B shot to the newborn schedule — as revealed by The New York Times in 1991. Big Pharma targets the babies when consenting adults refuse. https://t.co/0SXfinOuS8

@Riley_Gaines_ - Riley Gaines

So when will they tell us why it was recommended in the first place?

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: CDC vaccine panel votes 8-3 to stop policy recommending that all infants get the hep B vaccine at birth, per Axios.

Saved - December 4, 2025 at 10:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a study claiming Pfizer mRNA was found in 88% of vaccinated pregnant women (placenta and blood), 100% of vaccinated men in sperm, 50% in seminal fluid, and 50% beyond 200 days post-injection. It also says 50% of unvaccinated pregnant women showed mRNA in placenta or blood. The team used nested PCR with Sanger sequencing on 34 participants, counting only signals reproduced in 3 of 4 tests. They urge market withdrawal.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas, Sperm, and Blood — and in 50% of Unvaccinated Pregnant Women Human biodistribution study shows Pfizer mRNA penetrates fetal/reproductive tissues, persists long-term, and presents clear evidence of shedding ⬇️ Researchers analyzed 34 human participants—including pregnant women, male sperm donors, and additional adults—using nested PCR with Sanger sequencing, a far more sensitive method than standard qPCR. Only signals reproduced in 3 of 4 tests were counted, ensuring detection of verified Pfizer mRNA and not noise or contamination. They found: 📍88% of vaccinated pregnant women (within 100 days of injection) had Pfizer mRNA in both placenta and maternal blood. 📍100% of vaccinated men with viable sperm had Pfizer mRNA in their sperm cells; 50% had it in seminal fluid. 📍50% of individuals tested over 200 days post-injection were still positive — confirming long-term mRNA persistence. 📍50% of unvaccinated pregnant women had Pfizer mRNA — two in placenta and blood, one in blood alone — providing the strongest evidence to date of shedding. This should immediately trigger market withdrawal and apologies to the public for inflicting grave harm based on fraudulent assumptions.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: CDC Child Death Records Indicate CATASTROPHIC Transgenerational Harm of Mass mRNA "Vaccination" A new analysis of CDC data by @EthicalSkeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a 77% excess rate ⬇️ 📈30-year decline in infant/child mortality reversed in 2021 ⚠️Transgenerational effect: sustained excess mortality in children never infected or injected ⚠️Teratogenic signal: deaths rose among infants exposed in utero ⚠️17,975 excess deaths (ages 0–4) since rollout ⚠️ Excess death causes align closely with those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting the same mechanisms may now carry across generations. The implications extend FAR beyond the current generation. If validated, this would represent a public health crisis of historic magnitude—one not only for those who took the injections, but for the children and grandchildren who never consented to the risks.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

🚨Those children born of past-vaccination mothers, despite never having been vaccinated themselves, and despite never having had Covid... are dying now at 77% excess - a 24 sigma event.

Saved - November 27, 2025 at 8:10 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨NEW STUDY FINDS 86% OF PCR-POSITIVE “COVID CASES” WERE NOT REAL INFECTIONS Fear campaigns, lockdowns, and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion. Accountability is warranted for those who used fake tests to manufacture panic and destroy livelihoods.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the early pandemic, 2020, 2021, eighty six percent of COVID cases confirmed by PCR were not real infections. So all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, all of those horrible policies that destroyed our livelihoods and economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. So this study compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks. Because the antibody test will tell you, did you get the antibodies to COVID? And only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It may even be up to ninety percent weren't even real real infections. So now that this fraud is confirmed, you know, again, peep people have to be held accountable. All the people that lost their jobs that were forced to take these injections based on this fear campaign was all based on this false test, this fraudulent test.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections New German study finds that during the early pandemic period, only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real — proving that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion. PCR technology and testing thresholds were standardized across WHO member states. That means the same distortion likely occurred everywhere — a systemic diagnostic inflation that may be the single greatest fraud in public health history. These tactics were likely used to amplify fear in order to boost compliance with lockdowns and experimental gene-based “vaccines.” Accountability is warranted.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING — Nearly Half of “COVID-19 Deaths” Were Not Due to COVID-19, New Study Finds 🚫45.3% of "COVID-19 deaths" in Athens, Greece had NO SYMPTOMS — only a positive PCR test ✅Confirmed via clinical adjudication, chart audits & physician interviews 🌎Greece followed the

Saved - November 2, 2025 at 6:06 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Two MASSIVE studies (n=8.7 MILLION) found that mRNA "vaccines" increase your risk of SEVEN cancer types. Breast, bladder, lung, prostate, thyroid, gastric, and colorectal cancers ALL surge after vaccination. This aligns with the 17 confirmed cancer-inducing mechanisms of mRNA. https://t.co/xAegzN6Ai0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker cites two population studies on COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk, claiming they show massive increases in multiple cancers. The first study, from Italy, followed 300,000 Italians for about 30 months and reported about a 23 percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations, with increases of about 40 to 60 percent in breast cancer hospitalizations, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia/lymphoma. A new study from South Korea, involving over eight million Koreans, purportedly corroborates the Italian data and expands on it. It reports about a 26 percent increase in overall cancer risk and increases across six major types of cancer, including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancer, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speaker frames these findings as an absolute disaster and claims they confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. They state that the datasets corroborate these results and that the observed effects can be explained by gene expression chaos documented in other studies, along with genomic integration observed in stage four cancer patients. The speaker characterizes the situation as a disaster that needs immediate acknowledgment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies Comprehensive literature review reveals how mRNA injections may induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancer through 17 distinct pathways ⬇️ 1. Genome instability – mRNA may integrate into DNA, causing mutations. 2. Immune escape – Spike disables tumor suppressors like p53. 3. Impaired DNA repair – Spike disrupts genomic repair enzymes. 4. Chronic inflammation – LNPs & spike fuel cancer-promoting inflammation. 5. Immune suppression – T-cell & interferon decline weakens surveillance. 6. RNA disruption – Codon optimization derails microRNA function. 7. Oncogenic signaling – Activates PI3K/mTOR & MAPK pathways. 8. Tumor microenvironment – LNPs accumulate in tumors, speeding spread. 9. Reawakening dormant cancers – Disrupts immune control of latent tumors. 10. Immune surveillance failure – m1Ψ-modified RNA blocks toll-like receptors. 11. Frameshift errors – mRNA can produce unintended, harmful proteins. 12. Immune exhaustion – Boosters promote IgG4 & tolerance to cancer. 13. DNA contamination – Plasmid DNA may integrate into host genome. 14. SV40 sequences – Known tumor-promoter found in Pfizer vials. 15. RAS deregulation – Spike overactivates AT1R, driving proliferation. 16. Microbiota damage – Loss of bifidobacteria impairs anticancer defense. 17. Treatment resistance – Spike protein blunts chemo response.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Breast, Bladder, Lung, Prostate, Thyroid, Gastric, and Colorectal Cancers 2 massive studies tracked 8.7 MILLION people in Italy and South Korea — comparing vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Don't fall for the desperate vaccine cartel propaganda. https://t.co/jWNa54nXIk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can’t endorse these claims. Mainstream reviews find no causal link between vaccines and autism; studies with robust controls show no increased risk from vaccination. Autism is multifactorial, with genetics and neuroimmune factors playing roles, but vaccines are not a dominant or preventable driver. Claims of censorship, “most significant” vaccine risks, or iatrogenic scheduling are not supported by consensus evidence.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING — The Most Comprehensive Analysis Ever Conducted on the Causes of Autism Finds Vaccination Is the DOMINANT Risk Factor After decades of censorship and denial, the McCullough Foundation’s Landmark Report of over 300 studies finally delivers the verdict: Autism’s rise is multifactorial—but vaccination is the MOST significant, preventable driver. We found potential determinants of new-onset autism before age 9 to include: 👵Older parents (>35 years mother, >40 years father) 👶Premature delivery (<37 weeks) 🧬 Common genetic variants 🧩 Siblings with autism 🔥 Maternal immune activation 💊 In utero drug exposure ☣️ Environmental toxicants 🦠 Gut–brain axis alterations 💉 And combination routine childhood vaccination Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their components: ➡️ 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link ➡️ 29 claimed “no association,” yet lacked truly unvaccinated controls ➡️ 12 studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children found every time that the unvaccinated had far better overall health and dramatically lower autism risk. Biologic mechanisms converged on shared pathways—immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by clustered and early-timed vaccination during critical windows of brain development. By evaluating all known risk factors side by side, this analysis uniquely clarifies the relative contribution of vaccination compared to genetic and environmental domains. No prior review has attempted this integrative scope without excluding positive vaccine-association studies or unvaccinated controls—an essential step in determining whether vaccines truly play a role in autism risk, and if so, how significant that role is within the broader causal landscape. Our report represents a major breakthrough through the iron grip of censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s first major return to the scientific literature in years—after enduring years of irrational attacks from the vaccine cartel. Thanks to the tireless work of the McCullough Foundation team: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, John S. Leake, MA, Simon Troupe, MPH, Claire Rogers, MSPAS, PA-C, Kirstin Cosgrove, BM, CCRA, M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, PhD, Bre Craven, PA-C, Mila Radetich, Andrew Wakefield, MBBS, and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH — and support from the Bia-Echo Foundation — this historic effort was made possible. CONCLUSION ⬇️ The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state. Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination constitutes the most significant modifiable risk factor for ASD, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 24 hours, decades of propaganda denying a vaccine–autism link will face total collapse. Stay tuned.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The most comprehensive study ever conducted on the causes of autism drops in 72 hours. Legendary Dr. Andrew Wakefield returns to the scientific literature after years of immense attack from the vaccine cartel — armed with 79 pages of hard evidence. This changes everything. https://t.co/UUyGRlgjz4

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 12:29 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Humanity Was Hit With Dual Biological Weapons 1. Manufactured SARS-CoV-2 virus (US-China collaboration) 2. mRNA gene therapy "countermeasures" (DARPA) Billions are now suffering from these dual biowarfare agents — and there’s still ZERO accountability.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: Humanity was hit with dual biological weapons. When I say dual, I mean by the manufactured SARS CoV two virus that was manufactured in collaboration with UNC Chapel Hill and Wuhan. So we have that that has exposed basically the entire population to the spike protein. But then we also had the second biological weapon, was the mRNA injections, which installed about 7x more spike into people and those who received it per injection. And now we do understand that this can indeed shed onto others, particularly when you're freshly vaccinated and you're producing high levels of spike protein. We do believe this can shed via what's called exosomes, either through your breath or through your bodily fluids. So, yes, humanity has been hit by these weapons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Humanity was hit with dual biological weapons. When I say dual, I mean by the manufactured SARS CoV two virus that was manufactured in collaboration with UNC Chapel Hill and Wuhan. So we have that that has exposed basically the entire population to the spike protein. But then we also had the second biological weapon, was the mRNA injections, which installed about 7x more spike into people and those who received it per injection. And now we do understand that this can indeed shed onto others, particularly when you're freshly vaccinated and you're producing high levels of spike protein. We do believe this can shed via what's called exosomes, either through your breath or through your bodily fluids. So, yes, humanity has been hit by these weapons.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Scientists are sounding the alarm to warn the public that mRNA “vaccines” and COVID-19 are acting as “dual bioweapons” that are driving global surges in chronic disease and global sudden deaths. They warn that humanity is being wiped out by the “toxic synergy” of the injections and the virus they are supposed to tackle. The public was promised that Covid mRNA shots would protect against the virus. However, mounting evidence now suggests the opposite. https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-sound-alarm-global-excess-deaths-driven-dual-bioweapons-covid-mrna-shots/

Scientists Sound Alarm: Global Excess Deaths Driven by 'Dual Bioweapons' of Covid & mRNA Shots - Slay News Scientists are sounding the alarm to warn the public that mRNA "vaccines" and COVID-19 are acting as "dual bioweapons" that are driving global surges in chronic disease and global sudden deaths. slaynews.com
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 2:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can’t help summarize or promote claims that mRNA vaccines cause severe brain damage or huge safety risks. Reputable safety reviews from CDC/FDA find vaccines are safe for most people, with no credible evidence for the drastic risk increases you cite. If you’d like, I can provide a factual, neutral overview of what current safety data show.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

mRNA "vaccines" function as chemical lobotomies — causing SEVERE brain damage & DEVASTATING mental health. They increase your risk of: 1️⃣ Cognitive impairment (+137.7%) 2️⃣ Depression (+68.3%) 3️⃣ Anxiety disorders (+43.9%) 4️⃣ Sleep disorders (+93.4%) 5️⃣ Alzheimer’s (+22.5%) 6️⃣ Ischemic stroke (+44%) 7️⃣ Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%) 8️⃣ Transient ischemic attack (+67%) 9️⃣ Myelitis (+165%) 🔟 Myasthenia gravis (+71%) ⚠️CDC/FDA safety thresholds breached (PRR ≥ 2 compared to flu shot) for 86 neuropsychiatric disorders, some of which include: 📈 Dementia – 140× more likely 📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely 📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely 📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely 📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely 📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely 📈 Depression – 530× more likely 📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely 📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely 📈 Delusions – 50× more likely This is likely due to toxic spike protein production and accumulation in the skull-meninges-brain axis.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The transcript cites multiple studies indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. A study by Oten colleagues found that the mRNA vaccine mRNA and spike protein were being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. It is stated that the mRNA shot is based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it, which purportedly found a two hundred percent increased risk of stroke after dose two of mRNA shots. The claim is that the vaccine goes to the brain, causes brain damage and neuronal destruction, and that this is reflected in neuropsychiatric conditions. This is linked to a study by Doctor James Thorpe and colleagues, which allegedly identified eighty-six neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, and violent behavior, all claimed to be far in excess of what was reported with flu vaccinations, and described as corroborating multiple other studies. The transcript also references a study from Korea finding increased Alzheimer's risks and increased cognitive impairment risks, and another Korea study reporting a massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. The overall assertion is that, based on peer reviewed evidence, the injections damage the brain, cause brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. We have multiple studies now indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. And that's because now a study by Oten colleagues that found the mRNA, vaccine mRNA, and spike protein was being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. We know the mRNA shot's based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it. They found two hundred percent increased risk of stroke in after dose two of mRNA shots. So we do know it goes to the brain, causes brain damage, neuronal destruction, and that is reflective onto neuropsychiatric conditions. That was found now in a study by doctor James Thorpe and colleagues. They actually identified 86 neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, violent behavior. All of this stuff was found to be in far exceedance of what was reported with the flu vaccinations. And so this is so concerning, and this also corroborates multiple other studies. One out of Korea that found increased Alzheimer's risks, increased cognitive impairment risks. And also, another study, I believe also out of Korea, found massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. And so we clearly now know based on the peer reviewed evidence, it damages the brain, causes brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi: "I am no longer optimistic anymore." "I'm afraid that these mRNA vaccines have already done their job." "We're seeing... billions of people whose brains are not working anymore—not as they should be." "They are altered." https://t.co/0EsxKy4rm7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses a deep loss of optimism, stating that they are no longer optimistic and attributing a specific cause. They claim that the RNA vaccines, specifically modRNA vaccines, have already accomplished their supposed function, and that this outcome was not anticipated by the planners. According to the speaker, the vaccines’ effects were not understood at the time the programs were designed. The speaker asserts that the vaccines have caused vessels throughout the body to be attacked from head to toe, describing a systemic process never seen in any other disease. They characterize this as systemic vasculitis, which they say leads to the destruction of brain cells. The speaker warns that billions of people are experiencing brains that are not functioning as they should, stating that those individuals “are altered” and that they do not have the willpower or the intelligence to perform basic actions. A central claim is that the only chance to address the situation is to stop what the speaker terms this “modRNA crime.” They describe the situation as a crime and suggest it will destroy humanity if not halted. The speaker emphasizes that these RNA vaccines are being rolled out broadly, asserting that people do not realize the extent to which this is being done. The overall message conveys a fear that widespread deployment of RNA vaccines is causing systemic vascular and neurological damage, and that urgent action is necessary to stop it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I'm going to be very honest with you. I am no longer, optimistic anymore, and the reason is very simple. Mhmm. The reason is because I'm afraid that these RNA vaccines, mod RNA vaccines, whatever you want to call them, have already done their job. And what their job has been, and this is incredible, was not even known to the planners because they didn't realize that what they were doing. But it is what I said years ago that the vessels throughout the body are going to be attacked from top to toe. This is something that never happens in any disease. Okay? Systemic, meaning the brain, the heart, the liver, everything can be attacked, the vessels. And, the trouble is that it's turned out to be true. So this systemic vasculitis leads to destruction of brain cells, obviously, and that is what we are now experiencing. We are seeing, I'm afraid to say, billions of people whose brains are not working anymore, not as they should be. They are altered, and they do not have they they don't have the the willpower anymore. They do not have the intelligence anymore to move things. And so the only chance we have is to stop this modRNA crime because this crime is going to destroy us. The trouble is that they're rolling out these, RNA vaccines all over the place, and people don't realize this is being done.
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 1:38 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨mRNA Technology Unleashes a Chain Reaction of Biological Destruction — the “Cascade of Harm” 🧬Gene Dysregulation → 🧩Protein Errors → 🩸Biochemical Stress → ⚠️Severe Clinical Outcomes → ☠️ Death This is why mRNA technology will NEVER be safe👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a cascade of harms from mRNA injections, asserting that different individuals experience a variety of issues because the injections initiate chaos at the transcriptomic level. A recent study is cited as proof, noting that the process regulates thousands of gene expressions that are critical for immune regulation and mitochondrial function, and it purportedly invokes cancerous activity by suppressing tumor suppressor genes p53 and BRCA. The speaker says this occurs at the transcriptomic level, and references another study from the prior week that shows proteomically that the proteins produced from the dysregulated transcription are defective, contributing to a range of issues. Moving up to the next tier in the cascade, the speaker describes biochemical changes following injection. After vaccination, there are elevated inflammatory markers such as CRP, and increases in BNP and various cardiac enzymes, which are presented as indications of cardiac damage. The implication is that these biochemical changes reflect downstream harms. At the final tier, the speaker connects these molecular and biochemical disturbances to clinical outcomes. The claimed clinical harms include myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers. The overall narrative is that the mRNA injections initiate a multi-tier cascade—from transcriptomic disruptions affecting gene regulation, immune function, and mitochondrial activity, through proteomic consequences with defective proteins, to biochemical signals of inflammation and cardiac injury, culminating in a range of clinical conditions. The speaker emphasizes that the referenced studies are either recent or in progress. One study is described as having been “proved” and is on the preprint server undergoing peer review, while another study is noted as having appeared “last week,” illustrating the progression from transcriptomic changes to proteomic outcomes. The sequence of claims is structured as a tiered pathway—transcriptomic, proteomic, biochemical, and clinical—culminating in diverse harms observed in some vaccinated individuals, with the assertion that the effects vary by person due to the initial chaotic molecular changes. The clinical spectrum listed includes myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers, linked to the preceding molecular and biochemical alterations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's called the cascade of harms from mRNA injections. That's why we see all these various different issues pop up in some vaccinated individuals. You know, everybody appears to be different in what they experience because the the mRNA injections begin the chaos molecularly at what's called the transcriptomic level. We just proved that in a recent study. It's now on the preprint server undergoing peer review. It actually just regulates thousands of gene expressions critical for immune regulation, mitochondrial function and it does invoke cancerous activity by suppressing tumor suppressor genes p53 and BRCA. So it does that transcriptomically and then we now have another study that came out last week that shows proteomically. So the proteins being produced now from this dysregulated transcription are defective. All They they're are causing all sorts of issues. And then you move up to tier three of the cascade of harms, then you reach biochemicals. So we do see after injection now elevated CRP, so inflammation. We see BNP, we see these cardiac enzymes elevated indicating cardiac damage. Then the last tier is clinical. That's why we see various different harms. Clinically myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes and cancers.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING: mRNA Technology Triggers a Chain Reaction of Biological Destruction Two landmark studies map the “Cascade of Harm” 👇 1. 🧬Gene Dysregulation — thousands of genes disrupted, ribosomal dysfunction, mitochondrial collapse 2. 🧩Protein Errors — Aberrant protein production, abnormal fibrinogen, actin & amyloid; seeds for clotting & misfolded aggregates 3. 🩸Biochemical Stress — ↑proBNP (heart strain), ↑carbamide (kidney dysfunction), ↑CRP/ferritin (inflammation) 4. ⚠️Clinical Outcomes — myocarditis, clotting, turbo cancers, immune collapse, kidney failure, death These two new studies connect the dots, mapping the full stepwise progression of damage unleashed by mRNA technology: from transcriptomic dysregulation, to proteomic corruption, to biochemical distress, and finally to devastating clinical outcomes: 📰von Ranke N, Zhang W, Anokin P, Shao D, Bereimipour A, Vu M, Hulscher N, McKernan KJ, McCullough PA, Catanzaro JA. Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation: Evidence From New-Onset Adverse Events and Cancers Post-Vaccination. Preprints. 2025;2025072155. doi: 10.20944/preprints202507.2155.v1 📰Hudák A; Pettko-Szandtner A; Letoha A; Letoha T. Clinical and Proteomic Associations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination in Multimorbid Patients: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8007. doi: 10.3390/ijms26168007

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING STUDY: mRNA Injections Induce Severe, Long-Lasting Genetic Disruption Linked to Cancer and Chronic Disease 🧪 Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, we discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering https://t.co/fLuUHPFRW0

Saved - October 17, 2025 at 1:31 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Operation Warp Speed Functioned as a Mass Sterilization Program mRNA shots annihilate over 60% of women's non-renewable egg supply (Karaman et al). They reduce pregnancy success by 33% (Manniche et al). Here's why humanity is now facing an existential birth rate collapse👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned the sterilization of women. We do now have two studies that are very disturbing to to say the least. We have one. They injected rats. This is by Carman and colleagues. They injected rats with mRNA shots that actually destroyed 60% of their primordial follicle. This is the nonrenewable egg supply in women for those who don't know, and so these don't regenerate. Right? And also destroyed all the other types of eggs as well, even the ones that, spawn after the, base version, the primordial version. So it destroyed the primary, secondary eggs. It it basically decimated the ovarian system. So we have that in animals, but then we also now have human data in a peer reviewed study by Manichi and colleagues looked at one point three million women. So they compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women. The vaccinated woman had thirty three percent lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. So we see this now in large human data sets as well. So we do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Earlier this week President Trump mused that he didn’t believe he’d get into heaven — but the truth is he’s doing God’s work here. Infertility is increasing in America, and the @POTUS MAHA Agenda is addressing the root causes. Today, through President Trump’s leadership, we’re expanding access to IVF, giving millions of Americans the chance to raise a family.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that national fertility is dangerously low, pointing out that the fertility rate in the country has fallen from 3.5% during a previous president’s term to 1.6% today, with replacement level at 2.1%. He labels the current rate a national security threat and attributes the decline to root causes that President Trump is addressing through the MAHA agenda, which aims to reduce endocrine disruptors and exposure to chemicals that decrease fertility. Key claims include that today’s average teenager has 50% of the sperm count of a 65-year-old man and that 50% of a 65-year-old man’s testosterone is present in today’s teenagers. He also notes that girls are entering puberty six years earlier. The speaker emphasizes that parents who want to have children are not able to, and he mentions his own family, saying he has seven children and feels blessed, implying personal insight into the issue. He references Harvard University’s study released that morning stating obesity rates have climbed to over 70%, tying this to what he describes as “the same reason we’re flooding our kids” with chemicals and “poisoning a mass generation of kids.” He credits President Trump with addressing these problems at the root cause and notes that GLP drugs have been made available at most favored nation, and that this week it’s IVF. The speaker thanks the President for these actions, stating that the President has done God’s work and has achieved peace in the Middle East, and that these efforts are happening while the government is “locked down by the Democrats.” He asserts that the administration continues to work for the American people due to the President’s energy, commitment, and vision, and expresses gratitude for being allowed to be part of it. In closing, he reiterates that the focus is on addressing fertility decline by reducing endocrine disruptors, improving reproductive health through policy actions (MAHA), and expanding access to treatments like IVF, while linking these efforts to broader national security and demographic concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. Thank you for your vision, your commitment to our country. When my uncle was president, fertility rate in this country was three point five percent. Today it is one point six percent. The replacement rate, in other words, the fertility that you need in order to keep your population even is two point one percent. We are below replacement right now. That is a national security threat to our country. And we know why this is happening. And President Trump is addressing the root causes through his MAHA agenda of reducing endocrine disruptors, the exposure to chemicals that decrease fertility. Today, the average teenager in this country has 50% of the sperm count, 50% of the testosterone is a 65 year old man. Our girls are hitting puberty six years earlier. And that's bad, but also our parents aren't having children. Parents who want to have children do not have access. I have seven children. I feel that God has blessed me with that. And I can't imagine how different my life would be if I did not have that blessing. I want to point out also that this morning Harvard University released a study that showed that the obesity rates have now climbed over seventy percent. And this, again, is for the same reason we're flooding our kids. We're poisoning a mass a generation mass poisoning a generation of kids with chemicals. President Trump has instructed us to stop these problems at the root cause. He's also recognized that there are people who are injured, people who are not living their life to the fullest. And he's addressing that last week. We made GLP drugs available at most favored nation. And this week, it's IVF. I want to thank you so much for that, Mr. President. I saw on an airplane the other day, you said that you didn't believe that you were going to get to heaven. You're doing God's work here. You're you've made peace in The Middle East, which is beyond anybody's imagination. And now you're giving millions of Americans a chance to have babies. And you're doing this while the government is locked down by the Democrats. That's true. But this administration has not stopped working for the American people. That's right. And that's because of your energy, your commitment, your vision, and I wanna thank you for allowing me to be part of it.
Saved - October 16, 2025 at 3:17 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Your Risk of SEVEN Cancer Types 2 Landmark Studies tracked 8.7 MILLION people in Italy and South Korea — comparing vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Breast, bladder, lung, prostate, thyroid, gastric, and colorectal cancers ALL surged after vaccination.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two early population studies examining COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk reported substantial increases in various cancers. The first study, conducted in Italy, followed about 300,000 individuals for roughly 30 months and found: - About a 23% increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. - Increases of about 40% to 60% in hospitalizations for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and for leukemia/lymphoma. A newer study from South Korea, encompassing over eight million people, examined cancer risks after vaccination and corroborated the Italian findings while expanding on them. It reported: - About a 26% increase in overall cancer risk. - Increases across six major cancer types, including gastric (stomach), thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancers, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speakers characterize these results as an absolute disaster and claim that the data corroborate all experimental evidence. They state that these findings confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. Further explanations offered include: - The datasets corroborate the observed cancer increases. - The authors suggest these increases can be explained by “gene expression chaos” documented in their other studies. - They also cite “genomic integration” seen in stage four cancer patients as part of the mechanism behind the observed cancer risks. The overall message presented is that there is a widespread, vaccine-associated rise in cancer incidence, supported by the Italian and Korean population data, and reinforced by their cited molecular and genomic observations. The speakers conclude that this situation is a disaster that must be acknowledged immediately.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The only two large-scale, population-wide cohort studies assessing COVID-19 "vaccines" and cancer risk found MAJOR INCREASES IN MULTIPLE CANCERS. BOTH mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) and viral-vector (Janssen/AstraZeneca) platforms are carcinogenic. https://t.co/dOmsKEilwh

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Second MASSIVE Population Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of SIX Major Cancers South Korea study of 8.4 MILLION adults finds higher risks of overall, lung, prostate, thyroid, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancers — across BOTH mRNA and viral-vector⬇️ https://t.co/8Q7v4a9JxR

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a Stage IV cancer case where a vaccine-derived Spike sequence allegedly fused into chromosome 19, with perfect 20/20 identity to a Pfizer plasmid region; multi-omics show oncogene activation and genomic instability, temporally linked to Moderna vaccination. The authors argue this indicates vaccine-induced oncogenesis and transgenerational harm, urging immediate market withdrawal and further surveillance.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” GENOMIC INTEGRATION In a Stage IV cancer patient, we identified a vaccine-derived Spike gene sequence chimerically fused into chromosome 19 with PERFECT 20/20 base-pair identity — 1-in-a-trillion chance of coincidence. ⬇️ In our sentinel peer-reviewed case report — just published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science — we describe a previously healthy 31-year-old woman who developed rapidly progressive stage IV bladder cancer within 12 months of completing a three-dose Moderna mRNA injection series. Bladder cancer is exceedingly rare in young women, and such aggressive presentations are almost unheard of. To investigate, we performed comprehensive multi-omic profiling, including plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA, whole-blood RNA, and urine exosome proteomics. What we uncovered was striking: ⚠️DIRECT GENOMIC INTEGRATION EVENT: Within circulating tumor DNA, a host–vector chimeric read mapped to chr19:55,482,637–55,482,674 (GRCh38), in cytoband 19q13.42, positioned ~367 kb downstream of the canonical AAVS1 safe harbor and ~158 kb upstream of ZNF580 at the proximal edge of the zinc-finger (ZNF) gene cluster. This sequence aligned with perfect 20/20 bp identity to a segment (bases 5905–5924) within the Spike open reading frame (ORF) coding region (bases 3674–7480) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 DNA plasmid reference (GenBank accession OR134577.1). Although the patient received only Moderna injections, the sequence aligned to Pfizer’s published BNT162b2 plasmid reference because Moderna has never deposited its proprietary plasmid in NCBI. Crucially, both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines encode the same prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and therefore share identical stretches of nucleotide sequence within the Spike ORF coding region. It is within one of these conserved regions that the integration was captured, producing the perfect 20/20 bp match to the Pfizer reference. The probability of a random 20-base sequence perfectly matching a predefined target is ~1 in a trillion. This makes accidental artifact virtually impossible. Multi-omics profiling revealed: – Oncogene activation (KRAS, NRAS, MAPK1, PIK3CA, CHD4, SF3B1) – DNA repair collapse (ATM, MSH2) → genomic instability – Transcriptomic chaos across plasma, blood, and urine The convergence of (i) close temporal proximity to vaccination, (ii) genomic integration of a vaccine plasmid–derived spike gene fragment, and (iii) consistent transcriptomic and proteomic instability across biospecimens represents a highly unusual and biologically plausible pattern. The discovery of spike gene integration directly within a cancer may help explain the surge in post-vaccination “turbo cancers,” as well as emerging signals of transgenerational harm — including excess infant deaths among children of vaccinated parents. Together, these data point to a biologically plausible mechanism linking mRNA injections to oncogenesis and heritable genomic disruption. These findings demand urgent genomic surveillance, orthogonal validation with long-read sequencing, and large-scale cohort studies to fully assess the genomic and oncologic risks of synthetic mRNA technology. This evidence compels the immediate withdrawal of all COVID-19 mRNA products from the market. Humanity now confronts the unprecedented threat of vaccine-induced genomic disruption—a danger too great to ignore. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: CDC Child Death Records Indicate CATASTROPHIC Transgenerational Harm of Mass mRNA "Vaccination" A new analysis of CDC data by @EthicalSkeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a 77% excess rate ⬇️ 📈30-year decline in infant/child mortality reversed in 2021 ⚠️Transgenerational effect: sustained excess mortality in children never infected or injected ⚠️Teratogenic signal: deaths rose among infants exposed in utero ⚠️17,975 excess deaths (ages 0–4) since rollout ⚠️ Excess death causes align closely with those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting the same mechanisms may now carry across generations. The implications extend FAR beyond the current generation. If validated, this would represent a public health crisis of historic magnitude—one not only for those who took the injections, but for the children and grandchildren who never consented to the risks.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

🚨Those children born of past-vaccination mothers, despite never having been vaccinated themselves, and despite never having had Covid... are dying now at 77% excess - a 24 sigma event.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

It’s time to come to terms with the fact that approximately 70% of the global population received carcinogenic, gene-altering injections under fraudulent assurances of safety. Immediate market withdrawal and full accountability are now imperative. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-peer-reviewed-study-715

BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration In a Stage IV cancer patient, we identified a vaccine-derived Spike gene sequence chimerically fused into chromosome 19 with perfect 20/20 base-pair identity — a 1-in-a-trillion chance of coincidence. thefocalpoints.com

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY LINK - Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130

Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggres-sive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination | International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science ijirms.in
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 3:47 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨STUDY: Cell Phone Radiation at 20× Below Legal Limit Causes Brain Damage in Rats Corroborates human data: high EMF exposure TRIPLES the risk of neurodevelopmental delays in infants (Setia et al). The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry doesn’t care about your health.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Speaker 1: just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Speaker 0: Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test it every time a study tests the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 “Tens of thousands of studies show the EXTREME DANGERS of cell phone radiation.” Watch RFK Jr. sound the alarm about cell phone radiation: “People are not paying attention.” “If you’ve got a kid, don’t ever let him put his cell phone near his head.” “Don't let him carry it in one of his front pockets.” “If it's a girl, don't let them carry the cell phone in their breast pocket. Don't let them carry them anywhere near your ovaries.” “The farther the cell phone is from your head when you're talking, the better off you are.” “A lot of our kids sleep with the cell phone right next to their heads … don't let them do that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have won a suit in the court of appeals against the FCC, alleging the agency lied to the public about cell phone radiation and safety, and asserts that the FCC must redo its regulations on cell phones. He asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head and should avoid carrying it in front pockets; for girls, he says not to carry the phone in the breast pocket and to keep it away from ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head during a call, the better. He asserts, “there are tens of thousands of studies” showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation and claims that people are not paying attention. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he advises against that. He recommends removing the cell phone at night so that children can get eight hours without it and stresses that this is really important.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just won a big suit against the FCC in the in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation, about cell phone safety. And see, FCC now has to go back and redo all of its regulations on, you know, on your cell phones. Cell phone if you you got a kid, don't ever let him put his cell phone near his head and, you know, don't let him carry it in one of their his front pockets. You know? But if it's a girl, don't let him carry the cell phone in their breast pocket. Don't let him carry them anywhere near your their ovaries. And the farther the the cell phone is from your head when you're talking, the better off you are. So and I you know, there's tens literally not this is not a hyperbole when I say tens of of thousands of studies that that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. And and, you know, people are not paying attention. A lot of our our kids sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads. They fall asleep with them on the bed. Don't let them do that. Get that cell phone. And if you can get away from them at night so that they get eight hours without it, anywhere near them, that that is really important.
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 10:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlight mushrooms (Cordyceps, Turkey Tail, Reishi) that boost NK and T cells, block angiogenesis, trigger apoptosis, with a 34% cancer-risk reduction in meta-analyses and improved survival/QoL in trials. Fenbendazole links to remission in Stage IV cancers and has a strong human safety profile. Ivermectin shows anticancer potential across 14 mechanisms, with intranasal nano-ivermectin shrinking brain tumors in animals and a noted safety profile even with chemo.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨Multiple Studies Confirm Ivermectin, Fenbendazole & Mushrooms Exhibit Potent Anti-Cancer Activity via 20+ Mechanisms 💠Ivermectin: ✅ Widespread anecdotal reports of remission ✅ 14 distinct anticancer mechanisms (systematic review) ✅ Targets glioblastoma, leukemia, ovarian, cervical cancers & more ✅ Proven safe—even with chemo 💠Fenbendazole: ✅ Linked to remission of Stage IV cancers (Makis et al) ✅ Strong safety profile in humans ✅ Disrupts tumor metabolism & growth pathways 💠Medicinal Mushrooms (Cordyceps, Turkey Tail, Reishi): ✅ Boost NK & T cells ✅ Block angiogenesis ✅ Trigger apoptosis ✅ ↓ cancer risk by 34% (meta-analysis) ✅ ↑ survival & QoL (39 clinical trials) It’s time for cancer therapies that HEAL the body—not destroy it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thirty years, forty years. They'll look back at chemotherapy as a barbaric and kind of caveman like thinking of destroying the entire body to treat a cancer. Know, we gotta get away from this. We gotta move towards targeted approaches and even towards natural compounds, like medicinal mushrooms—cordyceps, turkey tail mushroom—these have shown lots of promise. But also ivermectin and fenbendazole are now gaining national attention as possible cancer treatments, with positive anecdotal reports of remission after taking these products. A recent study—a systematic review of ivermectin in cancer—found not only is it completely safe if people are undergoing conventional treatment, but it does show potent anti-tumor effects in the test tube via 10 mechanisms. And so, we gotta go to natural compounds. Forty years from now, I hope we’re not still administering chemotherapy as the main form of treatment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thirty years, forty years. They'll look back at chemotherapy as a barbaric and kind of caveman like thinking of destroying the entire body to treat a cancer. Know, we gotta get away from this. We gotta move towards targeted approaches and even towards natural compounds. You know, like medicinal mushrooms, like cordyceps, like turkey tail mushroom, these have shown lots of promise. But also ivermectin and fenbendazole are also now, that's really gaining national attention now as possible treatments for cancer and there's a lot of positive anecdotal reports now of people reporting remission after taking these products. So a recent study actually came out, a systematic review of ivermectin in cancer. They found not only is it completely safe if people are undergoing conventional treatment, but it does show potent anti tumor effects in the test tube via like 10 mechanisms. And so, yeah, we gotta go to natural compounds. And yeah, forty years from now, I truly hope we're not still administering chemotherapy as the main form of treatment.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Intranasal Nano-Ivermectin Shrinks Brain Tumors by 70% Without Toxicity Landmark preclinical study shows intranasal ivermectin nanocapsules safely shrink glioblastoma in animal models at doses lower than the approved human antiparasitic dose 👇 📍Rats with implanted glioblastoma tumors received intranasal nano-ivermectin for 10 days at 60 µg/day — a dose below the approved human antiparasitic level. 📉Tumor volume dropped by ≈70% compared to untreated controls (79 mm³ vs 254–277 mm³). 📉The treatment also reduced necrosis, edema, and vascular proliferation, indicating less invasive and aggressive tumors. ✅No toxicity was observed — normal liver, kidney, blood, and lung histology; body weight unchanged throughout treatment. Other formulations — free ivermectin and silica-based particles — showed no significant tumor reduction, highlighting key role of nanocapsule delivery for brain targeting. These findings align with ivermectin’s 14 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms summarized by Yuwen et al, encompassing inhibition of oncogenic signaling (YAP1, Wnt–TCF, Akt/mTOR, EGFR/NF-κB, MAPK), mitochondrial and oxidative-stress induction, ion-channel modulation, and suppression of both cancer stem cells and the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Clinical translation in humans is urgently needed.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 STUDY – Ivermectin Shows Striking Anticancer Potential and Remarkable Safety Largest review of ivermectin and cancer to date finds 14 distinct anticancer mechanisms — and no safety concerns ⬇️ ✅ Signs of remission & tumor stability ✅ 36 cancer patients – NO serious

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

1. The Remarkable Anti-Cancer Potential of Mushrooms: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/the-remarkable-anti-cancer-potential 2. Fenbendazole Linked to Remission in Three Stage IV Cancer Patients: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-fenbendazole-linked-to 3. Ivermectin Shows Striking Anticancer Potential and Remarkable Safety: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-ivermectin-shows-striking

The Remarkable Anti-Cancer Potential of Mushrooms Biological mechanisms, epidemiological evidence, and clinical data support the use of mushrooms in cancer prevention and treatment. thefocalpoints.com
NEW STUDY: Fenbendazole Linked to Remission or Near-Remission in Three Stage IV Cancer Patients Breast, prostate, and melanoma patients experienced dramatic tumor regression and long-lasting remission — without chemotherapy. thefocalpoints.com
NEW STUDY – Ivermectin Shows Striking Anticancer Potential and Remarkable Safety Largest review to date of ivermectin use in cancer patients finds no safety concerns, promising anecdotal reports, and strong preclinical evidence of tumor suppression. thefocalpoints.com
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 1:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a significant update regarding the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal, which has declared COVID-19 mRNA injections as biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction. This historic ruling is recognized by Canada and emphasizes the need for accountability from governments and health agencies. The declaration cites violations of various legal frameworks, including the Biological Weapons Convention and the Nuremberg Code. This marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding these injections and their implications for public health and safety.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: World’s First International Governing Body and Judicial Authority Declares mRNA Injections Biological and Technological Weapons of Mass Destruction The Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal — recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis — has issued a historic global Order intended to take immediate worldwide effect. “This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ or ‘COVID-19 injections‘ meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction according to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, of 1989 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat.(2023), Canada‘s Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 2004, and the International Biological Weapons Convention. This Order and Declaration is intended to have immediate worldwide effect.” Canada’s Ministry of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) formally acknowledged the Alliance of Indigenous Nations, its Treaty, and its International Tribunal—a judicial body composed of judges from every continent. In its official letter dated December 13, 2024, Canada affirmed that its relationship with the A.I.N. exists on a Nation-to-Nation basis, thereby recognizing the Tribunal as a sovereign legal authority under Indigenous and international law. Whether this unprecedented declaration will trigger tangible legal or governmental action remains to be seen. But it sets a historic precedent: a recognized international tribunal has formally named the COVID-19 mRNA injections as weapons of mass destruction—placing the burden squarely on world governments, public health agencies, and courts of law to respond. Credit to @PhdSansone for breaking this landmark development.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Our New Study Shows COVID-19 mRNA Injections Violate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) — Making Them UNLAWFUL 🚫💉Also violated the Nuremberg Code, Helsinki Declaration, and U.S. Constitutional protections (1st, 10th, 14th Amendments). These shots were engineered with dangerous gain-of-function traits: 🧬 Spike protein encoded with furin cleavage site 🧬 HIV-like & SEB superantigen motifs 🧬 mRNA recoded with synthetic base (m1Ψ) → aberrant proteins By coercing populations into taking unsafe, experimental gene-transfer products without informed consent, these violations were multiplied across society. Accountability is warranted. Shout out to the scientists, physicians, and legal experts who made this study possible: @AndrewZywiecMD @IreneMavrakakis @MarivicVillaMD5 @jathorpmfm @P_McCulloughMD @AaronKheriatyMD @CharlesRixey @AbraxasHudson @DrPaulEMarik

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

COVID Vaccines ‘Unleashed Profound Harm’ New Peer-Reviewed Paper Says The study, authored by 11 scientific and legal experts, found the man-made features of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are likely the result of controversial gain-of-function research. The

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

This marks the first formal judicial declaration by any recognized international authority categorizing the COVID-19 mRNA products as biological weapons. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-worlds-first-international

BREAKING: World’s First International Governing Body and Judicial Authority Declares mRNA Injections Biological and Technological Weapons of Mass Destruction The Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal — recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis — has issued a historic global Order intended to take immediate worldwide effect. thefocalpoints.com
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 11:53 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID-19 “Vaccines” Caused More American Deaths Than WWI, WWII, and Vietnam COMBINED Pfizer’s mRNA shot ALONE is linked to at least 470,000 American deaths in a single year (~1 death per 636 doses). This trail of mass destruction was just swept under the rug — and rewarded.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was over a million Florida adults included in this study. And what they found was those who received Pfizer compared to Moderna injections faced a thirty six percent higher risk of all cause mortality not due to COVID nineteen. So what that means is if you extrapolate all of America, and you look at how many people got the Pfizer shots, and the number actually does come out to four hundred and seventy thousand American deaths from Pfizer alone in the first year of the mRNA campaign, so in 2021. This number is so large. It is rivaling the death toll of World War one, World War two, and the Vietnam War combined for American casualties just in that first year. This also does corroborate the fairs extrapolation estimate death toll, which is actually six hundred thousand American deaths based on an underreporting factor of thirty one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is a very robust study. Florida surgeon Joel Joel Ledepo is the senior author. There was over a million Florida adults included in this study. And what they found was those who received Pfizer compared to Moderna injections faced a thirty six percent higher risk of all cause mortality not due to COVID nineteen. So what that means is if you extrapolate all of America, and you look at how many people got the Pfizer shots, and the number actually does come out to four hundred and seventy thousand American deaths from Pfizer alone in the first year of the mRNA campaign, so in 2021. So that is a bear that is a minimal estimate. This number is so large. It is rivaling the death toll of World War one, World War two, and the Vietnam War combined for American casualties just in that first year. And so this this this is such strong evidence now, and we can only imagine how much Moderna killed. Right? This also does corroborate the fairs extrapolation estimate death toll, which is actually six hundred thousand American deaths based on an underreporting factor of thirty one. But again, these are conservative estimates. We are likely in the millions for American deaths.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Pfizer Strikes $70 Billion Deal with U.S. to Expand Its Disastrous mRNA Empire, Lower Drug Prices A “landmark agreement” gives Pfizer cover to expand its failed mRNA platform — sweeping a trail of death and destruction under the rug. Pfizer bragged: “With this agreement in place, Pfizer can fully focus on delivering the next generation of cures… in areas like oncology, obesity, vaccines, and inflammation and immunology.” After catastrophic injuries, deaths, and disabilities linked to its COVID products, Pfizer isn’t punished — it’s rewarded with protection and growth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are ready to invest, as the president also mentioned, $70,000,000,000 in the next few years from Pfizer in manufacturing and research in America alone. I really think this is an historical moment because also I can put that behind us and focus on the things that I want to spend my time. Cancer treatments to bring better obesity medicines, to bring better vaccines, to bring things that people value. And thank you for allowing us to do that. I want to thank secretary Kennedy. I want to thank secretary Latnick. Your leadership helped us to pull that together. You are the mastermind of everything. But you are even more brilliant because you had someone in your team that he was the driving force behind everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are ready to invest, as the president also mentioned, $70,000,000,000 in the next few years from Pfizer in manufacturing and research in America alone. I really think this is an historical moment because also I can put that behind us and focus on the things that I want to spend my time. Cancer treatments to bring better obesity medicines, to bring better vaccines, to bring things that people value. And thank you for allowing us to do that. I want to thank secretary Kennedy. I want to thank secretary Latnick. Your leadership helped us to pull that together. You are the mastermind of everything. And without the brilliant way that you designed the whole thing, we wouldn't be able to make it happen. Bless it. But you are even more brilliant because you had someone in your team that he was the driving force behind everything. And I don't have words to thank you for your integrity. And it is what you have said. We created trust from day one, and that was the most important thing that allowed us to be able to pull very difficult negotiations. Of course, also, I want to to thank the US trade representative who is also heavily engaged, and he's probably the first trade representative that I have seen that cares about our industry and cares to do something about unfair situations out there, but more than anyone else. Mister president, I want to thank you Thank you very much. For your leadership and, frankly, for your friendship. Thank you. Albert, thank you very much. Great job. Great job.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Surgeon General Study Indicates Pfizer mRNA Shots ALONE Responsible for a MINIMUM of 470,000 American Deaths 📈36% increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality among Pfizer recipients vs. Moderna 💉~250M Americans took at least 1 COVID shot 🌎60% got Pfizer → 150M https://t.co/ac6QXdycsY

Saved - October 1, 2025 at 12:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A study of 1.47 million Florida adults reveals that Pfizer recipients face a 37% higher risk of death compared to those who received Moderna. The findings show a 53% increase in cardiovascular deaths and an 88% increase in COVID-related deaths, raising concerns about mRNA levels and DNA contamination in Pfizer lots.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Pfizer Recipients Face 37% Higher Risk of Death Than Moderna Recipients Study of 1.47M Florida adults by MIT’s @RetsefL + @FLSurgeonGen finds Pfizer is significantly more deadly than Moderna: 📍 All-Cause Death: +37% 📍 Cardiovascular Death: +53% 📍 COVID Death: +88% 📍 Non-COVID Death: +35% Moderna delivers 3x more mRNA than Pfizer — raising concern that excess mortality may stem from higher DNA contamination in Pfizer lots reported globally.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

"Pfizer is definitely worse". NEW from Joseph A. Ladapo at Florida Health Department: "They should not be used in any Human Beings...and you know there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too...and I think many of us wouldn't want to eat that food" https://t.co/vFCwxdKN05

Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple studies show that of two, Moderna and Pfizer, Pfizer is definitely worse for cardiovascular side effects related to blood clotting, Pfizer is worse for neurologic effects, and Pfizer is worse for serious adverse events overall. A few studies have shown that Pfizer may be associated with be associated with an increase in mortality also compared to Moderna. The vaccines, they are not the same. Pfizer is definitely worse. You've got more myocarditis cases with Moderna, but Pfizer is worse overall. I apologize that it hasn't been clear. They shouldn't take them. They are products that should not be going into human Because these products, they should not used in any human beings. And, you know, there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too, and and I think many of us wouldn't wanna eat that food either, that meat. Along those lines, what's your recommendation?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, multiple studies now, to be very clear, multiple studies now show that of the two, Moderna and Pfizer, Pfizer is definitely worse. Pfizer is worse for cardiovascular side effects related to blood clotting. Pfizer is worse for neurologic effects, and Pfizer is worse for serious adverse events overall. A few studies have shown that Pfizer may be associated with be associated with an increase in mortality also compared to Moderna. The vaccines, they are not the same. You know, we've you've heard my opinion, Doctor. Corey's, Doctor. Walzcog's opinions about their use in general. But between the two of them, Pfizer is definitely worse. You've got probably more myocarditis cases with Moderna, but Pfizer is worse overall. So I apologize that it hasn't been clear. They shouldn't take them. They are products that should not be going into human Because these products, they should not used in any human beings. And, you know, there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too, and and I think many of us wouldn't wanna eat that food either, that meat. Sort of along those lines, what's your recommendation?
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 12:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared findings from the Florida Surgeon General's study, which suggests that Pfizer's mRNA vaccine is linked to a minimum of 470,000 excess deaths in the U.S. This figure arises from a 36% increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality among Pfizer recipients compared to those who received Moderna. With around 150 million Americans vaccinated with Pfizer, the data indicates a concerning death rate of one additional death for every 636 doses administered. I believe these vaccines should be removed from the market immediately due to these alarming statistics.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Surgeon General Study Indicates Pfizer mRNA Shots ALONE Responsible for a MINIMUM of 470,000 American Deaths 📈36% increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality among Pfizer recipients vs. Moderna 💉~250M Americans took at least 1 COVID shot 🌎60% got Pfizer → 150M people ⚰️U.S. baseline death rate ≈ 0.87% per year → Expected deaths: 150M × 0.0087 = 1.305M ✅Now apply the 36% mortality increase: 1.305M × 0.36 = ~470,000 excess deaths — from Pfizer alone . That’s 1 death per ~636 doses. These extraordinarily dangerous injections must be pulled off the market immediately.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Pfizer Recipients Face 37% Higher Risk of Death Than Moderna Recipients Study of 1.47M Florida adults by MIT’s @RetsefL + @FLSurgeonGen finds Pfizer is significantly more deadly than Moderna: 📍 All-Cause Death: +37% 📍 Cardiovascular Death: +53% 📍 COVID Death: +88% 📍 Non-COVID Death: +35% Moderna delivers 3x more mRNA than Pfizer — raising concern that excess mortality may stem from higher DNA contamination in Pfizer lots reported globally.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

"Pfizer is definitely worse". NEW from Joseph A. Ladapo at Florida Health Department: "They should not be used in any Human Beings...and you know there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too...and I think many of us wouldn't want to eat that food"

Video Transcript AI Summary
First of all, multiple studies now, to be very clear, multiple studies now show that of the two, Moderna and Pfizer, Pfizer is definitely worse. Pfizer is worse for cardiovascular side effects related to blood clotting. Pfizer is worse for neurologic effects, and Pfizer is worse for serious adverse events overall. A few studies have shown that Pfizer may be associated with, may be associated with an increase in mortality also compared to Moderna. The vaccines, they are not the same. But between the two of them, Pfizer is definitely worse. You've got probably more myocarditis cases with Moderna, but Pfizer is worse overall. So I apologize that it hasn't been clear. They shouldn't take them. They are products that should not be going into human. Because these products, they should not used in any human beings. And, you know, there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too, and and I think many of us wouldn't wanna eat that food either, that meat. Sort of along those lines, what's your recommendation?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, multiple studies now, to be very clear, multiple studies now show that of the two, Moderna and Pfizer, Pfizer is definitely worse. Pfizer is worse for cardiovascular side effects related to blood clotting. Pfizer is worse for neurologic effects, and Pfizer is worse for serious adverse events overall. A few studies have shown that Pfizer may be associated with, may be associated with an increase in mortality also compared to Moderna. The vaccines, they are not the same. You know, we've you've heard my opinion, Doctor. Corey's, Doctor. Walzcog's opinions about their use in general. But between the two of them, Pfizer is definitely worse. You've got probably more myocarditis cases with Moderna, but Pfizer is worse overall. So I apologize that it hasn't been clear. They shouldn't take them. They are products that should not be going into human Because these products, they should not used in any human beings. And, you know, there's some people who are trying to put them in animals too, and and I think many of us wouldn't wanna eat that food either, that meat. Sort of along those lines, what's your recommendation?
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 5:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my concerns about Pfizer's recent $70 billion deal with the U.S., which seems to allow the company to expand its mRNA platform despite serious issues linked to its COVID products. A study indicates that Pfizer's shots may be responsible for around 470,000 excess deaths in the U.S. alone, raising alarm about the safety of these vaccines. It feels like accountability is nonexistent, as the government appears to protect Pfizer's interests while ignoring the potential consequences for public health.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Pfizer Strikes $70 Billion Deal with U.S. to Expand Its Disastrous mRNA Empire, Lower Drug Prices A “landmark agreement” gives Pfizer cover to expand its failed mRNA platform — sweeping a trail of death and destruction under the rug. Pfizer bragged: “With this agreement in place, Pfizer can fully focus on delivering the next generation of cures… in areas like oncology, obesity, vaccines, and inflammation and immunology.” After catastrophic injuries, deaths, and disabilities linked to its COVID products, Pfizer isn’t punished — it’s rewarded with protection and growth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are ready to invest, as the president also mentioned, $70,000,000,000 in the next few years from Pfizer in manufacturing and research in America alone. I really think this is an historical moment because also I can put that behind us and focus on the things that I want to spend my time. I want to thank secretary Kennedy. I want to thank secretary Latnick. Your leadership helped us to pull that together. Of course, also, I want to to thank the US trade representative who is also heavily engaged, and he's probably the first trade representative that I have seen that cares about our industry and cares to do something about unfair situations out there, but more than anyone else. Mister president, I want to thank you Thank you very much. For your leadership and, frankly, for your friendship. Thank you. Albert, thank you very much. Great job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are ready to invest, as the president also mentioned, $70,000,000,000 in the next few years from Pfizer in manufacturing and research in America alone. I really think this is an historical moment because also I can put that behind us and focus on the things that I want to spend my time. Cancer treatments to bring better obesity medicines, to bring better vaccines, to bring things that people value. And thank you for allowing us to do that. I want to thank secretary Kennedy. I want to thank secretary Latnick. Your leadership helped us to pull that together. You are the mastermind of everything. And without the brilliant way that you designed the whole thing, we wouldn't be able to make it happen. Bless it. But you are even more brilliant because you had someone in your team that he was the driving force behind everything. And I don't have words to thank you for your integrity. And it is what you have said. We created trust from day one, and that was the most important thing that allowed us to be able to pull very difficult negotiations. Of course, also, I want to to thank the US trade representative who is also heavily engaged, and he's probably the first trade representative that I have seen that cares about our industry and cares to do something about unfair situations out there, but more than anyone else. Mister president, I want to thank you Thank you very much. For your leadership and, frankly, for your friendship. Thank you. Albert, thank you very much. Great job. Great job.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Surgeon General Study Indicates Pfizer mRNA Shots ALONE Responsible for a MINIMUM of 470,000 American Deaths 📈36% increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality among Pfizer recipients vs. Moderna 💉~250M Americans took at least 1 COVID shot 🌎60% got Pfizer → 150M people ⚰️U.S. baseline death rate ≈ 0.87% per year → Expected deaths: 150M × 0.0087 = 1.305M ✅Now apply the 36% mortality increase: 1.305M × 0.36 = ~470,000 excess deaths — from Pfizer alone . That’s 1 death per ~636 doses. These extraordinarily dangerous injections must be pulled off the market immediately.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Pfizer Recipients Face 37% Higher Risk of Death Than Moderna Recipients Study of 1.47M Florida adults by MIT’s @RetsefL + @FLSurgeonGen finds Pfizer is significantly more deadly than Moderna: 📍 All-Cause Death: +37% 📍 Cardiovascular Death: +53% 📍 COVID Death: +88% 📍

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The message is clear: accountability is off the table, and Pfizer’s genetic empire now stands shielded by the U.S. government itself. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/pfizer-strikes-70-billion-deal-with

Pfizer Strikes $70 Billion Deal with U.S. to Expand Its mRNA Empire, Lower Drug Prices ‘Landmark agreement’ lets Pfizer expand its disastrous mRNA platform — sweeping a massive trail of death and destruction under the rug. thefocalpoints.com

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

@FiveTimesAugust 20D chess!