reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Nigel_Farage
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
Long live the revolution in Iran. https://t.co/7qG1e6Tt0F
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by President Obama, the European Union, the British Foreign Office, and later Boris Johnson, describing the regime as an appalling evil that has maintained a theocratic, barbarous rule for fifty years. They address the brave protesters in Tehran and elsewhere fighting to regain their freedoms, and declare: long live the revolution. They also say they pray for the Persian people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what is going on right now in Iran is something that should give us great thought. Back in 2015, president Obama, the European Union, the British Foreign Office, and then later on Boris Johnson and all the rest did a deal with this appalling evil regime that has been there for fifty years, that has continued their theocratic, appalling, barbarous rule. And I wanna say this to those brave men and women out there on the streets of Tehran and elsewhere now, fighting to get back their freedoms, their liberties. As far as I'm concerned right now, long live the revolution. I pray for the Persian people.
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 This video proves @EssexPoliceUK transported left-wing protestors to The Bell hotel in Epping. There is no way Chief Constable BJ Harrington can stay in position. https://t.co/tN07UFEGca
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
150,000 illegal migrants have crossed the Channel since 2018. They are now bringing more than 50 of their family members into Britain a day. This is absolute madness. https://t.co/lGUkUNceB0
Video Transcript AI Summary
People arrive in the UK as asylum seekers, often claiming family ties to stay. This leads to a chain of family reunifications. In contrast, the US is actively deporting individuals who entered illegally, and many in Britain support this approach. Reform UK is committed to addressing illegal immigration and deporting those who enter unlawfully. The party draws parallels with the situation in America and seeks support from those who share the belief that current immigration practices are unacceptable. Join and vote for Reform UK to help tackle this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So people come here in the back of a lorry or on a boat across the channel as an asylum seeker and being softies, we say, yeah. Okay. Alright. You can stay. Now over 50 people a day come into Britain because they say, oh, my uncle's there.
My nan's there. My little kid's there. And so what's really happening is we let people across the channel. It isn't just them that come. Ultimately, their whole families come as well.
We must be absolutely mad. In America, what Donald Trump is doing already is deporting people who've come into America illegally. And far from being the monster, now over 50% of Britons think Trump is doing the right thing. Let me promise you something. The only political party that is serious about stopping illegal immigration, about deporting those who come here illegally is us at Reform UK.
It's just won an election for Trump in America. We may be a different country. The principles are exactly the same. If you think, as I do, that the whole thing's an outrage, please support us. Please join us.
Please vote for us.
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
At last the truth. The Southport murderer was reported to Prevent three times. The cover-up has been a disgrace. I was right all along. https://t.co/wxiQkSH0kO
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the aftermath of the tragic murder of three girls in Southport, speculation arose about the suspected murderer. Questions were raised about whether he was monitored by security services, but no answers were provided by the police, the prime minister, or the home secretary. This lack of transparency fueled online speculation and unrest. Despite attempts to inquire about the suspect's identity in the House of Commons, no information was released. It appears that the authorities failed to act appropriately, and there are indications that the suspect's family was aware of his intentions. The situation reflects a troubling disparity in policing and governance, leading to significant outrage and frustration over the handling of the case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the wake of that horrendous murder of those 3 girls in Southport last summer, just 24 hours afterwards, there was a huge amount of speculation about who the suspected murderer was. I put out this video. I asked this basic question.
Speaker 1: I have to say there are 1 or 2 questions. Was this guy being monitored by the security services? Some reports say he was. Others, less sure. I just wonder whether the truth is being withheld from us.
I don't know the answer to that, but I think it is a fair and legitimate question.
Speaker 0: So I asked the question, was he known to the authorities? No answer came from the police. No answer came from the prime minister. No answer came from the home secretary. And for daring to ask a question that the public deserved to know and should have known and, actually, had they known, might have stopped much of the online speculation that led to rioting on the scale that we saw.
No. Nothing was forthcoming at all. I was even told I wasn't allowed to ask a question in the House of Commons about the identity of this man and whether he was known. Well, I was right all along. Three times, this young man was given to prevent.
They clearly haven't acted correctly. It seems that other members of his family knew what his intentions were, and we have had one of the worst cover ups I think I've ever seen in my lifetime. I was completely vilified for daring to ask these questions. This is 2 tier policing. This is 2 tier governmental approach to who lives in this country.
It is an outrage. And I can tell you, actually, I'm angrier today than I've been at any point since those horrendous murders.
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
This illegal migrant has made a threat on my life and is now in the UK. He is the kind of person we are letting into our country. https://t.co/dpnLw9NDy4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I come to England to marry your sister. Don't talk about me; you don't know me. The later video is no good.
I'm coming to England. I'm a mother. Every country knows me. I'm a TikToker, not a gang or mafia.
I'm mafia's papa motherfucking Rice Montana. Welcome to London, mother. My videos and lives are content. You must see it first.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: English man, don't talk, shit about me. You not know me. I come to England because I want, marriage, with your sister. Don't talk about anymore. The later video, there's no good, my friend.
You not know me. I gonna come to England. I gonna mother. Mother. You know?
There's mother. Every country know me. I'm TikToker. I'm not gang. I'm not mafia.
I'm mafia's papa motherfucking. Rice Montana. Hello. Welcome to London. Mother All my video, my live, there's content content.
You know, first, you must see
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage MP
Parliament must be recalled for a proper debate. https://t.co/OrQa7o38a1
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage
Rishi Sunak doesn’t want you to share this clip. It would be a shame if you did. https://t.co/M4ae6ySctz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Penny Morton was asked about the promise to reduce net migration in various manifestos since 2010, with over 4.3 million people entering the country. The questioner doubts the credibility of a new promise to cut migration in the 5th manifesto due to past failures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question is to Penny Morton. Given that your 2010 manifesto, your 2015 manifesto, your 2017 manifesto said you've reduced net migration to tens of thousands. Your 2019 manifesto said immigration would massively reduce and that net 4,300,000 people have come into the country since that time. Why on earth should anybody believe the 5th manifesto that promises cuts to net migration? Because of the record of this prime minister.
So we've had
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage
This is so wrong and very frightening. Why so many police officers?
@Nigel_Farage - Nigel Farage
The establishment are trying to force me out of the UK by closing my bank accounts. I have been given no explanation or recourse as to why this is happening to me. This is serious political persecution at the very highest level of our system. If they can do it to me, they can do it to you too
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their unhappiness despite recent achievements and thanks those who voted for them. They discuss their personal and business accounts being closed by their long-time banking group without a clear reason. They have been unable to find another bank willing to open accounts for them. The speaker speculates that they may be considered a politically exposed person (PEP) due to their involvement in politics, which increases compliance costs for banks. They also suggest that prejudice from institutions and false accusations of receiving money from the Russian government may be contributing factors. Without a bank account, they feel like a nonperson and question their ability to function in modern society. They hint at discussing their decision further on GB News at 7.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello there. Now you would think in the light of this that I'd be pretty happy. I mean, you know, news presenter of the year. The Trick Awards was pretty cool, and a massive thanks to all of those people out there that voted for me. The establishment were, of course, appalled because they, in their little London bubble, think that I'm incredibly unpopular.
Well, in Notting Hill, I might be, maybe not quite so in the rest of the country. But, actually, Truth is I'm not following the joys of spring. I've been living with something for the last couple of months that may well fundamentally affect my future career going on from here, and whether I could even stay living in this country. I have been with the same banking group since 19 eighty. I've had my personal accounts with them since that date and my business accounts right through the 19 nineties while I worked in the city of London and in recent years So I'm with 1 of the subsidiaries of this big banking group, 1 with a very prestigious name, but I won't name them just yet.
I got a phone call a couple of months ago to say we are closing your accounts. I asked why. No reason was given. I was told a letter would come which would explain everything. The letter came through and simply said, we are closing your accounts.
We want to finish it all by a date, which is around about now. I didn't quite know what to make of it. I complained. I emailed the chairman. A lackey phoned me to say that it was a commercial decision, which I have to say, I don't believe a single moment.
So I thought, well, there we are. I'll have to go and find a different bank. I've been to 6. No, 7 banks actually, asked them all, could I have a personal and a business account? And the answer has been no in every single case.
There is nothing irregular or unusual about what I do. The payments that go in and come out every month are pretty much the same. I maintain in my business account quite a big positive cash balance, which, I guess, with interest rates where they are, it's pretty good for the bank too. So why is this happening to me? Well, one explanation is this.
A few years ago, the European Union came up with a definition of somebody called a PEP, a politically exposed person. Now this could range from anybody from a prime minister down to a local counselor. I think the reason for it was, you know, were people in politics open to bribery? Could foreign governments from Ukraine or China or wherever else it may be, could they be pumping money into, you know, the accounts of corrupt politicians? So I I kind of understand that and get that.
But it's all about interpretation, isn't it? And what the banks argue is that to maintain an account for a politically exposed person gives them increased costs of compliance. Now I have spoken to the city minister in this country, And there is some hope that this EU definition, which came into British law, may be moderated in some way. We'll have to see. But, of course, any bank, any organization can choose to interpret a pet or whether they want the account in any way they choose.
To my knowledge, I don't think anybody has been treated like me in the world of politics. But then the banks you see themselves are part of the big corporate structures in this country. These are the organizations who did not want Brexit to happen. And I think in my case, probably the corporate world, will never ever forgive me because they know if I hadn't done what I did with the help of thousands of people in in in our people's army, that there would have been a referendum, let alone a victory. I'm the one that is to carry the blame.
So that's the 2nd possible reason why I can't get a bank account, prejudice that comes from our institutions. But I think there's a third reason. A few months ago, in the House of Commons, Sir Chris Bryant, Chairman of the Privileges Committee, said using parliamentary privilege that I had received large sums of money directly from the Russian government, and he named the calendar year in which it had happened. Truth is, I didn't receive a penny from any source with even any link to Russia. And yet, because he said it, it stands.
I wrote to the speaker. I demanded an apology. Nothing has been forthcoming from sir Chris Bryant. Well, I wonder whether that is what's given me part of the problem. I have employed a top firm of London lawyers.
I'm going through a series of subject access requests to find out what is held on me by the international agencies and by the bank that wants to close me down. But think about it. Without a bank account, you effectively become a nonperson. You don't actually exist. It's like the worst regimes of the mid 20th century, be they in Russia or Germany.
You literally become a nonperson. And you don't anymore. You did in the past, but you don't anymore actually have a right to be entitled to a bank account. Now there is a possibility for a fintech company that I could find some means of receiving and paying money, which could be a little bit of a lifeline. But it's not a bank account because I won't be able to earn any interest on positive cash balances.
I won't be able to borrow money if I need to at any point or take out a mortgage, should I? So does that. Now that will be completely denied to me. I I won't be able to have a debit card linked directly to my account. I won't really be able to exist and function in a modern 21st century Britain.
So I will tell you more about this on GB News at 7 tonight as to what my decision is, but I'm beginning to think that perhaps life in the United Kingdom is now becoming completely unlivable because of the levels of prejudice against me. I'll give you more of my thoughts at 7 o'clock tonight on GB