reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @NikolovScience

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 12:25 AM

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

🚨Data are now conclusive: There has been NO warming in Antarctica since 1979! This is shown by both surface- and satellite-based observations: - Surface data: Ma et al. (2025: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-05175-6) - Satellite Data: UAH 6.1 (2025: https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.1/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.1.txt)

Deep learning-based reconstruction of monthly Antarctic surface air temperatures from 1979 to 2023 - Scientific Data Gridded surface air temperature (SAT) data for Antarctica is a crucial foundation for studying climate change in the region. However, significant discrepancies exist between the available Antarctic gridded temperature datasets, particularly regarding the spatial distribution characteristics of long-term temperature trends. In this paper, we develop a new, regularly updated, spatio-temporally complete Antarctic monthly SAT dataset from 1979 onwards, with a spatial resolution of 1° x 1° in latitude and longitude, from multiple sources of in situ observations using deep learning method. Deep learning model was trained with daily SATs from three global reanalysis datasets. The reconstructed Antarctic SATs were successfully validated using data from staffed and automated meteorological stations, demonstrating a closer match with observations, particularly in capturing the patterns of temperature trends. This dataset represents a new advance in the development of Antarctic observational climate dataset and is an important resource that underpins research across diverse scientific disciplines, facilitating a deeper understanding of the Antarctic climate system and its global implications. nature.com
Saved - August 20, 2024 at 6:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that our 30-page climate paper has finally been published! It’s a significant study showing that the Sun, rather than CO2, is the primary driver of Earth's climate. We also received a Certificate of Publication from MDPI, the largest open-access science publisher.

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

🚨BREAKING: Our long-awaited 30-page climate paper was published today: -MDPI Geomatics website: https://mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/17 -PDF: https://mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/17/pdf This is a seminal study, which demonstrates through observations and math that the Sun (not CO2) drives Earth's climate!

Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations Past studies have reported a decreasing planetary albedo and an increasing absorption of solar radiation by Earth since the early 1980s, and especially since 2000. This should have contributed to the observed surface warming. However, the magnitude of such solar contribution is presently unknown, and the question of whether or not an enhanced uptake of shortwave energy by the planet represents positive feedback to an initial warming induced by rising greenhouse-gas concentrations has not conclusively been answered. The IPCC 6th Assessment Report also did not properly assess this issue. Here, we quantify the effect of the observed albedo decrease on Earth’s Global Surface Air Temperature (GSAT) since 2000 using measurements by the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project and a novel climate-sensitivity model derived from independent NASA planetary data by employing objective rules of calculus. Our analysis revealed that the observed decrease of planetary albedo along with reported variations of the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) explain 100% of the global warming trend and 83% of the GSAT interannual variability as documented by six satellite- and ground-based monitoring systems over the past 24 years. Changes in Earth’s cloud albedo emerged as the dominant driver of GSAT, while TSI only played a marginal role. The new climate sensitivity model also helped us analyze the physical nature of the Earth’s Energy Imbalance (EEI) calculated as a difference between absorbed shortwave and outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere. Observations and model calculations revealed that EEI results from a quasi-adiabatic attenuation of surface energy fluxes traveling through a field of decreasing air pressure with altitude. In other words, the adiabatic dissipation of thermal kinetic energy in ascending air parcels gives rise to an apparent EEI, which does not represent “heat trapping” by increasing atmospheric greenhouse gases as currently assumed. We provide numerical evidence that the observed EEI has been misinterpreted as a source of energy gain by the Earth system on multidecadal time scales. mdpi.com

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

We received this Certificate of Publication from MDPI (https://www.mdpi.com/about), the World's largest open-access science publisher:

MDPI | About MDPI is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access journals since its establishment in 1996. mdpi.com
Saved - July 27, 2024 at 7:47 AM

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

We just published a technical article about the Misrepresentation of Critical Satellite Data by IPCC: https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2024/07/26/nikolov-zeller-misrepresentation-of-critical-satellite-data-by-ipcc/ This improper manipulation of key CERES observations by Dr. Matthew Palmer & Dr. Chris Smith has huge consequences for the IPCC narrative. Please share!

Nikolov & Zeller: Misrepresentation of Critical Satellite Data by IPCC 1. Introduction The 6th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR6) concluded “It is very likely that well-mixed GHGs [greenhouse gases] were the main driver of tropospheric warming since 1979” (IPCC, 2021; p.5). This statement implies that all known climate forcings have properly been evaluated using the available data, and GHGs… tallbloke.wordpress.com
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 11:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study confirms that the COVID mRNA shots containing N1-methyl-pseudouridine may suppress the immune system and stimulate cancer growth. This finding could explain the rise in cancer cases among young people. Some are calling for an international investigation and a trial to hold Big Pharma accountable. The use of pseudouridine in mRNA modification was awarded a Nobel Prize, which some find ironic. The shots have allegedly caused various health issues for millions of people globally.

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

🚨BREAKING: New published study by an international team of researchers confirms what some medical experts have been suspecting for 18 months: The COVID mRNA shots containing N1-methyl-pseudouridine SUPPRESS the immune system and STIMULATE cancer growth! https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

This finding explains the alarming rise of CANCER cases and cancer-caused deaths among young people (15 - 45 yo) observed since 2021... Princess Catherine is likely one of these vaccine-induced cancer victims: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/26/princess-catherine-is-one-of-many-more-young-adult/

Princess Catherine is one of many more young adults with cancer It is called early onset cancer. And the Princess of Wales, diagnosed at 42, is part of an unfortunate new trend of more and younger cancer cases. washingtontimes.com

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

The question now becomes: Who will hold #BigPharma and its Investors accountable for the irreparable damage they've done to humanity? We need an International Investigation and a Nurnberg 2.0 Trial to serve justice!

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

This is truly amazing: The mRNA modification using pseudouridine, which is now found to suppress immunity and stimulate cancer growth & metastasis (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323), was awarded a Nobel Prize as a "breakthrough research" in 2023 (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/nobel-prize-awarded-research-leading-mrna-covid-19-vaccines). Clown World!🤡

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

Here is another paper describing an awful cancer caused by the mRNA COVID jabs called "intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL)": https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594?src=exp-la Let's be honest: these shots have wreaked havoc on the health of 100s of millions of people worldwide.

Saved - August 24, 2023 at 11:11 PM

@NikolovScience - Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

This clip exposes John Kerry's lack of science background and understanding of Earth's geological history. We don't need uneducated activists like him to lecture us about climate and the environment.

@grhdhp - GRHDHP

@IanJaeger29 We the United Stea of America have this unelected fraud running around the world making deals with our enemies over CO2 emissions. John Kerry is a traitor to the United States.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's science degree from Yale, suggesting it's not a real science degree. Speaker 1 clarifies it's a liberal arts education. Speaker 0 then asks about the CO2 levels in the atmosphere. Speaker 1 states it's around 406 parts per million, while 350 is considered dangerous. Speaker 0 argues that CO2 levels have been higher in the past, but Speaker 1 explains that in the past 800,000 years, it has never been as high as it is today. Speaker 0 questions how CO2 levels reached 2,000 parts per million without human involvement. Speaker 1 mentions geological events. Speaker 0 dismisses the conversation as not serious and criticizes Speaker 1's testimony.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Isn't it true you have a science degree from Yale? Bachelor of arts degree. Is it a political science degree? Speaker 1: Yes. Political science. Speaker 0: So how do you get a bachelor of arts in a science? Speaker 1: Well, it's liberal arts education and degree. It's the bachelor Okay. Speaker 0: So it's not really science. So I think it's somewhat appropriate that somebody with a pseudoscience degree is here pushing pseudoscience in front of our committee today. Let's get back to the science of it. Let me ask you this. What's the Tensas on parts per million of, CO2 in the atmosphere? About 406, 406 today. Okay. 40 6. Are you aware 350 being Speaker 1: the level that scientists have said is dangerous. Speaker 0: Are you aware that since mammals have walked the planet, the average It's been over a 1,000 parts per million? Speaker 1: Yes, but we weren't working the planet. Let me just share We now know that definitively at no point during the least the past 800,000 years Has atmospheric c o two been as high as it is today? Speaker 0: The reason you chose 800,000 years ago is because For 200,000,000 years before that, it was greater than than it is today. And I'm gonna say that for the record Yeah. There weren't human beings. Speaker 1: I mean, that was a different world, folks. We didn't have cell, Speaker 0: it didn't So how to get to 2,000 parts per million if we humans weren't here? Speaker 1: Because there were all kinds Geologic events happening on earth which spewed up Did Speaker 0: the geology stop when we got on this planet? Speaker 1: Mister chairman, this is just Speaker 0: Not a serious conversation. Your your testimony is I'm not serious.
View Full Interactive Feed