TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NoVA_Campaigns
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Virginia Sen @MarkWarner will run for a 4th term in 2026 He promised he would only serve 2 terms “I don’t want to be a lifelong politician. If I’m elected to US Senate, I will serve no more than 2 terms. I think our system is renewed by new ideas and fresh people” @MarkWarnerVA https://t.co/1NyMfQhdzW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they do not want to be a lifelong politician and views public service as a limited-time commitment. They pledge to serve no more than two terms if elected to the U.S. Senate. The speaker believes the U.S. system benefits from constant renewal through new and fresh ideas and people. The speaker concludes by asserting their understanding of the role of a U.S. Senator.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't wanna be a lifelong politician. My view of public service is something you do for part of your life, not all of your life. That's why I've said that if I'm elected to the United States Senate, I will serve no more than two terms. Because I think the value of our system is that it's constantly renewed by new ideas, fresh ideas, and fresh people. So, senator, don't lecture me about what the role of The United States Senator is.
I know that role.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently faced backlash after being let go from my position at NIH, where I was an Education Outreach Specialist. Despite my dedication, some questioned my financial decisions and my stance on COVID-19 measures. I had been supportive of lockdowns and mask mandates, but I understand the frustration from those affected by these policies. I also faced criticism for the resources allocated to my brief tenure and my previous employment history. After reflecting on my experience, I chose to remove my emotional posts about my departure.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@KatieMSandlin, a probationary @NIH employee, posts crying story after being fired under Trump’s EO Katie spent years trashing Trump; a Fauci fangirl with finger puppet Education Outreach Specialist in NIH’s Education & Community Involvement Branch (ECIB) Had her own office https://x.com/katiemsandlin//katiemsandlin/status/1890929200627925166
Video Transcript AI Summary
I received an email from the Department of Health and Human Services stating that I was being terminated during my probationary period. They said my skills didn't fit the agency's needs and that my performance wasn't adequate. This really hurt because I worked hard to get this job, especially after moving from out of state.
It's upsetting to think some people are celebrating this, assuming we're lazy and living off the government. My coworkers and I cared about our jobs and wanted to help people. It's painful to have something you care about taken away unfairly. I'm worried about what I'm going to do now.
For those also dealing with this, know that you're not trash. What you did mattered, and you won't be forgotten by those you worked with.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just got my, I just got an email from the Department of Health and Human Services, And the subject was of the letter was notification of termination during probationary period. And the fourth paragraph says, unfortunately, the agency finds that you are not fit for continued employment because your ability, knowledge, and skills do not fit the agency's current needs and your performance has not been adequate to justify further employment at the agency. Like, I was already really upset that I was getting fired, but that just really hurt my heart so bad because I worked so hard my entire career to get this job. And then they had the nerve to say that. It's just I don't know what I'm gonna do.
I just moved here from out of state, and I'm so broke. And I'm just I don't know what I'm gonna do. And not only did the federal government basically throw me out like I'm garbage, then they, like, they say that it's because my performance was not adequate to justify further employment. I know it just really hurts my heart that there are so many people out there that are celebrating this. Like, we're some lazy people that are just living off the government and not working when my coworkers and I, like, we busted our butts and we really cared about our jobs and we really wanted to help people.
And I think that's why it hurts so much because when you really care about something and it's just taken away from you so unfairly, it just I don't know. It just it just does something to you. I have no idea what I'm gonna do. I'm so screwed. And then they just I can't believe they said that.
Like, I know it's a lie, but it's just like putting salt in a wound or whatever that saying is. I don't even know why I'm recording this, but I just I just really want people to know that Fang is so funny and that, like, you know, these liberals are crying tears or whatever and they get joy from that. We are real people and we have we have bills, and we have health issues and disabilities that we all need insurance to pay for. Like, why would you celebrate that? It's just so cruel.
I didn't make a whole lot of money, and I was fine with that. I was was serving other people. I just wanted to be able to pay my bills and take my dog to the vet and, you know, just get by. Like, that's I'm not trying to get rich. Why do so many people hate us when we work so hard and we just wanna help them.
I don't know. Anybody else that's out there that's dealing with this too, I just my heart breaks for you because we don't deserve this. We didn't do anything to deserve this. We're just you're not trash. You're important, and you you were at your agency wherever you worked, and you you did good work.
And I know that doesn't mean much, but what we did mattered. And we existed even though we're being erased now. We were there, and and just know that you won't be forgotten by the ones that worked with you.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Perhaps hiring employees who are making terrible financial decisions are not who we need working in human genuine projects to begin with… Maxing out credit cards, taking out loans & draining your savings… to work at @NIH Wasn’t smart https://t.co/3NmxpraZ5P
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin was cool with lockdowns, mask mandates and businesses closed during C19… as she panicked at home, shuttered away Not a lot of sympathy for people who lost their businesses due to hysteria from her cohort https://t.co/3pmvkxddX0
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin Also consider… the resources that @NIH devotes (spends money on) to creating an individual website bio for a brand new, probationary employee, who’s been on site for only 1 month… Not an executive, but an education outreach staff member You’d think she was an SES https://t.co/PPzy22vvfC
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin @KatieMSandlin doesn’t tell you she’s brand new at NIH because she used to be employed at @GEP_CURE under an @NIGMS grant & that funding ran out ♻️ Katie doesn’t mention: “…is it ok to point out what you failed at doing in the 1st grant?” Maybe your performance IS THE ISSUE https://t.co/UzxGT77HxQ
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS Katie has removed her sob 😭 video… but continues to inform us what she did for a month at NIH… Which is entirely redundant with curriculum builders at @usedgov, the state level, school system level, and textbook publishers There’s no need for school curriculum authors at NIH https://t.co/vaSrsGGiHJ
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS @usedgov Katie has in fact deleted all her @X posts lamenting the end to her probationary status We can presume she did not take the fork in the road email seriously while working for a month at @NIH https://t.co/i1rWxOu0lt
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS @usedgov @X Katie also wanted to ration health care to C19 unvaccinated Americans That’s right… she worked at NIH with the opinion that those skeptical of Fauci’s ouchie C19 mRNA shot should be last in line for health care Probably not who 🇺🇸wants at @NIH
@el_kalifornio - El Kalifornio
@NoVA_Campaigns @KatieMSandlin @NIH Katie also wanted to limit medical healthcare for the unvaccinated… https://t.co/j9XycSkAZv
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@USArmy pilot Rebecca Lobach’s entire social media nuked https://t.co/wFlIvNuBqh
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@USArmy helicopter Pilot Capt Rebecca Lobach, involved in DCA crash, served as a White House social aide under Biden. She escorted Ralph Lauren through the White House when he was among those awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by former President Joe Biden https://t.co/pogmNZus8Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ralph Lauren, son of Polish immigrants and a US Army veteran, receives the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He transformed a small necktie business into one of America's most iconic brands, influencing fashion, fragrance, and furniture. Lauren is also a committed philanthropist, actively working to combat cancer. His work embodies a blend of classic and innovative styles, reflecting the unique spirit of a nation filled with dreamers and doers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The presidential medal of freedom is awarded to Ralph Lauren. The son of Polish immigrants and a US army veteran, Ralph Lauren transformed a small necktie business into one of America's most iconic brands, leaving a lasting imprint on the world of fashion, fragrance, furniture, and beyond. Throughout it all, he remains a dedicated philanthropist, including fighting to end cancer as we know it. Classic yet creative, timeless yet innovative, Ralph Lauren reminds us of our distinct style as a nation of dreamers and doers.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
For 2.5y 🇺🇸+foreigners hunt down fellow Jan 6 🇺🇸 🎧#SeditionHunter @K2theSky “They thought it was their right 2b there; It sucks they didn’t know. Not an excuse; as #SH my goal has never been to hurt ppl; intention is accountability” Entire families ruined+bankrupted #SH=evil https://t.co/XG32EDdmPs
Video Transcript AI Summary
People seemed unaware of the consequences of their actions during the January 6 events, as evidenced by their live streaming and social media posts. Many did not grasp the seriousness of their behavior, believing they had a right to be there. While some are receiving significant sentences, most fall within the middle range, with many below the recommended guidelines. The goal is accountability for their actions, which may deter future misconduct. Their networks have been compromised, and there’s a sense of readiness to address any potential repeat offenses. This accountability is crucial for those who might consider participating in similar events again, as they are likely reconsidering after seeing the repercussions faced by others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back to, like, why people are freaking out about their sentences or why, they don't understand exactly, I guess, maybe the system and how it works. But just just from watching that day and then archiving footage and looking at people's social media, you could tell that they didn't think that they were going to get in trouble. Right? No one thought, anything was gonna happen to them. Otherwise, why would they be live streaming it, and why would they be posting about it days, weeks after?
And it wasn't until people started to get in trouble that they started to kinda slowly pull their their stuff off. And, you know, as as far as the sentencing goes, I just I don't think some of them thought I don't think they understood how serious it was because they they thought they were entitled to be there. They thought it was their right, and now they're finding out the consequences, and it sucks. And they they didn't know. It's it's like it's not an excuse.
Just because you didn't know the law is not an excuse for you breaking it, I guess. But, yeah, some of the peep some people are getting really big sentences, but if we look at the history of all of the j six sentences, none of the judges have gone to the high range. Typically, they fall in the middle and a majority of them go below the recommended sentencing. And I think that's good because, yeah, like, 40 years is is bonkers for what some of these people have done. But, like, Stuart Rhodes, I don't know.
I don't is he salvageable human? Like, I don't know if he's gonna want to come back to society and, like, behave. So he proved that yesterday by just by going on a live stream and and having the ego to do that and think that he's still not gonna you know, nothing's gonna happen to him for it. It's just kinda blows my mind. But, so, I mean, as a as a sedition hunter, I think my goal is never has never been to hurt these people or harm them and kind of kinda like stuff that's happening to you, Bruce, from the other side.
Like, that has never been my intention. My intention was always for about accountability for your actions. Right? And and I'd like to think that accountability then can lead to you maybe not doing it again. And the belligerence with a lot of these people, I mean, I I definitely don't think that they're gonna wanna do it again.
And if they do, then they're gonna see that we already know who they are, and we're here. Right? But I think it's more
Speaker 1: Their their network their network is just blown. I mean, their network is blown to shit. We all we know who they are. We have all their data. We have all their text messages.
I mean, their their network is blown.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, it's like, bring it is kind of how we feel. Right? Because we're here, and we're ready. And we've been spending two and a half years building up this movement to, counter it.
So so I think accountability is important, and I think deterrence is important. And especially for the people that maybe think before that, hey. I really wanted to be there on j six, and I'm gonna be there next time. I'm pretty sure are looking at these sentences and what peep like, all of these people getting, arrested and hopefully second guessing that, I guess. Next up.
reSee.it AI Summary
I introduced Sandy, a key figure in the Sedition Hunters, who collaborates with notable partners like Mike Fanone and Ryan J. Reilly. Sandy has played a crucial role in providing tips that led to numerous FBI arrests, all while balancing family responsibilities. There's a growing concern about potential retaliation against those involved. The Sedition Hunters, despite seeking anonymity, are featured in documentaries, raising questions about their motives. Many believe they are part of a broader political persecution, with significant consequences for individuals and families affected by their actions.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Meet Jan6’s key #SeditionHunter “Sandy”@K2theSky Partners with #SH @ryanjreilly, PBS, celebrity Jan6 cop Mike Fanone Directly credited for tips enabling hundreds of @FBI arrests & jail; fears “retaliation” Drops kids off, then works #SH day & night Some say Boston-area based
Video Transcript AI Summary
A bipartisan group of citizen investigators, known as sedition hunters, emerged after the January 6th Capitol riot to identify those involved. Sandy, an anonymous member, dedicated countless hours to this effort, using facial recognition software to help identify rioters like Scott Miller, who has since been arrested. The FBI, overwhelmed by tips, has sought assistance from these citizen sleuths to gather evidence. Sandy has identified around 100 rioters but remains anonymous in her community, feeling the impact of disinformation on her personal relationships. Despite her efforts, she receives no compensation, driven by a desire to hold individuals accountable and counter misinformation. The investigation into the Capitol riot remains the largest federal inquiry in history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's often had to rely on the work of a bipartisan group of citizen investigators who came to be known as sedition hunters. Judy Woodruff spoke with one of these anonymous sleuths as part of her ongoing series, America at a Crossroads.
Speaker 1: In the beginning, it was intense. I would drop my children off at school, I would come home, and I would be on it almost like a work day, And then once the kids were in bed, I was up until 2, 3, 4, and then waking up a couple hours later. It takes its toll, definitely.
Speaker 2: Sandy, like many Americans, was paying close attention on January 6th 2021.
Speaker 3: We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not gonna have a country anymore.
Speaker 2: As an angry mob of then president Donald Trump's supporters violently broke through police lines and stormed the Capitol Gate.
Speaker 4: My press. Bring my press. Bring my press.
Speaker 1: And I just remember hearing shots have been fired, and I don't think I'll ever forget that moment in my life.
Speaker 2: In the following days, Sandy, not her real name, joined a massive citizen effort to identify the individuals who broke into the capital. She's been directly responsible for
Speaker 4: helping to put people behind
Speaker 2: bars, and she now has to
Speaker 1: Sixer who is yet to be arrested. He started sending me, like, videos of him racking his gun.
Speaker 2: Sandy is today part of an informal community of dozens of ordinary Americans who came to be known as sedition hunters. Over time, they developed their own methodologies, guidelines, even a software application to keep track of every individual rioter, giving each one a pseudonym and compiling dossiers of evidence that they then turned over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation along with the rioter's real identity.
Speaker 1: One of the the first things is just getting a face, and there is one one rioter, orange goggle spiker is his hashtag. You can see him in the tunnel section of the capitol, beating up, the officers. Eventually, when I found his face, we were able to plug it into some facial recognition software that popped up a picture of him at his work.
Speaker 2: That photo led Sandy and other citizen slews to the rioter's real name, Scott Miller, which they submitted to the FBI along with evidence of his actions on January 6th. He has since been arrested.
Speaker 4: One of the sedition hunters pages has all these images that shows you who's been identified, who is not. So when you see, like, a lot of these, the blue here are the people who've been identified already but not yet arrested.
Speaker 2: Also following the investigation closely is Ryan Reilly, an NBC News reporter whose new book, Sedition Hunters, How January 6th Broke the Justice System, spells out how the FBI has struggled to investigate the thousands of people who stormed the Capitol.
Speaker 4: The FBI was so overwhelmed with the number of tips that they were receiving. They had received 100 of thousands of tips. And now you'll have the FBI going to the sleuth saying, hey. Can you help us out? We charged this guy.
We wanna make sure we got everything that he did that day. Can you give us a full report? They don't have the technological capabilities that they need to really pull this together.
Speaker 2: The FBI said in a statement that each tip is only the beginning of an investigation and that they are working diligently to gather sufficient evidence for prosecutors to bring charges in these cases. The FBI did not address the question of whether its technology is outdated, but acknowledged that its work has been, quote, greatly assisted by the many tips provided by the public, end quote, adding it hopes these tips continue to come in.
Speaker 1: If he's gonna blur the faces because he's afraid that sedition hunters, are gonna identify more criminals, it it go for it, buddy. Like, it doesn't matter to us. We can look at their clothing.
Speaker 2: This is the largest federal investigation ever undertaken. And although Sandy is at the heart of it, having helped identify 100 of rioters, almost nobody in her life knows about her work. People wanna know what you've been up
Speaker 1: to, and you have all of these exciting things that you wanna say, and you can't. I'll just default to the kids and what they're doing.
Speaker 2: You're not getting paid for this, are you?
Speaker 1: No. No. I haven't gotten paid a dime. This this is literally, your friends, your neighbors, your fellow citizens dedicating their time, their money, and their energy in holding people accountable. We had some that voted for Trump, and then after j 6 were disgusted by it because they took the peaceful transfer of power and just stomped all over it literally, and then they call themselves patriots.
I would like to have an ability to counter this disinformation that led us there. It's incredibly frustrating.
Speaker 2: Sandy has seen the effects of disinformation firsthand in her own family.
Speaker 1: I haven't spoken to a few of my cousins since January 6th because they, support it. We're we're divided, and I don't know how to pull us back together. I don't know how it's gonna change.
Speaker 2: For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Judy Woodruff in Washington DC.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
The #SeditionHunters are the Stazi They empowered the @FBI and @TheJusticeDept to hunt down and politically prosecute Americans 🇺🇸 They must all be made public… and live forever in history https://t.co/svJAWZRfAY
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Full @NewsHour documentary on #SeditionHunter “Sandy” … and @FBI mouthpiece, NBC News #SH reporter @ryanjreilly Despite the claim of wanting anonymity… the Sedition Hunters get full documentaries made on them https://t.co/uRTt2Aleee
Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation into the January 6th Capitol attack is the largest in FBI history, with over 1,200 charged and many more expected. Citizen investigators, known as sedition hunters, have played a crucial role in identifying rioters, often working late into the night. One participant, Sandy, has helped identify numerous individuals, including Scott Miller, using facial recognition software. The FBI has struggled with the volume of tips and outdated technology, relying on public assistance. Despite the challenges, some within the FBI show reluctance to pursue these cases. Experts stress the need for a broader approach to address the root causes of extremism, emphasizing the importance of education and media literacy. Sandy has faced personal divisions in her family due to differing views on the events of January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Investigation into 20 21's January 6th attack on the US Capitol is the largest FBI operation in history. More than 1200 people have been charged and over 900 convicted so far, and 100 more charges are expected before the investigation concludes. But it has stretched the bureau's resources, and it's often had to rely on the work of a bipartisan group of citizen investigators who came to be known as sedition hunters. Judy Woodruff spoke with one of these anonymous sleuths as part of her ongoing series, America at a Crossroads.
Speaker 1: In the beginning, it was intense. I would drop my children off at school, I would come home, and I would be on it almost like a work day. And then, once the kids were in bed, I was up until 2, 3, 4, and then waking up a couple hours later. It takes its toll, definitely.
Speaker 2: Sandy, like many Americans, was paying close attention on January 6, 2021.
Speaker 3: We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not gonna have a country anymore.
Speaker 2: As an angry mob of then president Donald Trump's supporters violently broke through police lines and stormed the Capitol Gate. Press. Press. Press. Press.
Speaker 1: And I just remember hearing shots have been fired, and I don't think I'll ever forget that moment in my life.
Speaker 2: In the following days, Sandy, not her real name, joined a massive citizen effort to identify the individuals who broke into the capital. She's been directly responsible for helping to put people behind bars, and she now has to hide her identity for fear of retaliation.
Speaker 1: One of the more insidious ones would be, a j sixer who is yet to be arrested. He started sending me, like, videos
Speaker 2: of him racking his gun. Sandy is today part of an informal community of dozens of ordinary Americans who came to be known as sedition hunters. Over time, they develop their own methodologies, guidelines, even a software application to keep track of every individual rioter, giving each one a pseudonym and compiling dossiers of evidence that they then turned over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation along with the rioter's real identity.
Speaker 1: One of the the first things is just getting a face, and there is one one rioter, orange goggle spiker is his hashtag. You can see him in the tunnel section of the capitol, beating up, the officers. Eventually, when I found his face, we were able to plug it into some facial recognition software that popped up a picture of him at his work.
Speaker 2: That photo led Sandy and other citizen slews to the rioter's real name, Scott Miller, which they submitted to the FBI along with evidence of his actions on January 6th. He has since been arrested.
Speaker 4: 1 of the sedition hunters pages has all these images that shows you who's been identified, who is not. So when you see, like, a lot of these, the blue here are the people who've been identified already but not yet arrested.
Speaker 2: Also following the investigation closely is Ryan Reilly, an NBC News reporter whose new book, Sedition Hunters, How January 6th Broke the Justice System, spells out how the FBI has struggled to investigate the thousands of people who stormed the Capitol.
Speaker 4: The FBI was so overwhelmed with the number of tips that they were receiving. They had received 100 of thousands of tips. And now you'll have the FBI going to the sleuth saying, hey. Can you help us out? We charged this guy.
We wanna make sure we got everything that he did that day. Can you give us a full report? They don't have the technological capabilities that they need to really pull this together.
Speaker 2: Is the FBI that far behind in terms of technology?
Speaker 4: They really just are sort of behind on open source intelligence. You know, one of the jokes within the FBI is yesterday's technology, tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Riley says it's estimated that about 3,000 people unlawfully entered the capital, damaged property, or assaulted police officers on January 6th. The FBI has charged more than 1200 of them so far, but the citizen sleuths have identified and submitted tips on about a thousand more.
Speaker 4: They're not gonna be able to get to the number of people who could actually be charged, with crimes on January 6th. We're gonna end this investigation when the 5 year statute of limitations expires with people who are identified but not yet arrested.
Speaker 2: The FBI said in a statement that each tip is only the beginning of an investigation and that they are working diligently to gather sufficient evidence for prosecutors to bring charges in these cases. The FBI did not address the question of whether its technology is outdated, but acknowledged that its work has been, quote, greatly assisted by the many tips provided by the public, end quote, adding it hopes these tips continue to come in. But Riley says the FBI's technology isn't the only reason for what he calls a backlog of January 6 cases.
Speaker 4: Well, we do have a lot of people, within the FBI who are not so enthusiastic about bringing these cases against people who attack the Capitol on January 6th.
Speaker 2: Are there still people in the FBI not enthusiastic?
Speaker 4: There are. And I say that because some of these individuals who were at the FBI have come out and said that publicly. They've resigned from the FBI because of these cases.
Speaker 2: Riley points out that in addition to current and former law enforcement officials pushing conspiracy theories, members of congress have opposed investigations into January 6th and also contributed to misinformation about what happened that day.
Speaker 5: Some of the people who breached the Capitol today were not Trump supporters. They were masquerading as Trump supporters and, in fact, were members of the violent terrorist group Antifa.
Speaker 2: These included the new speaker of the house, Mike Johnson, who in the run up to January 6th, took the lead in filing a lawsuit to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. He has said he plans to make public video footage from January 6th, but with faces blurred.
Speaker 6: We have to blur some of the the faces of persons who, participated in in the in the events of that day because we don't want them to be retaliated against, and, and and and to be charged by the DOJ.
Speaker 1: If he's gonna blur the faces because he's afraid that sedition hunters, are gonna identify more criminals, it it go for it, buddy. Like, it doesn't matter to us. We can look at their clothing.
Speaker 2: This is the largest federal investigation ever undertaken. And although Sandy is at the heart of it, having helped identify hundreds of rioters, almost nobody in her life knows about her work. People wanna know what you've been up
Speaker 1: to, and you have all of these exciting things that you wanna say, and you can't. I'll just, default to the kids and what they're doing.
Speaker 2: You're not getting paid for this, are you?
Speaker 1: No. No. Haven't gotten paid a dime. This this is literally, your friends, your neighbors, your fellow citizens dedicating their time, their money, and their energy in, holding people accountable. We have some that voted for Trump, and then after j 6 were disgusted by it because they took a peaceful transfer of power and just stomped all over it literally.
And then they call themselves patriots.
Speaker 7: I wish we were in a world where we didn't have to rely on groups of people, but I also think we're in a world where the FBI doesn't have the resources to do these investigations.
Speaker 2: Cynthia Miller Idris is the director of American University's Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab.
Speaker 7: We don't have the capacity in any law enforcement agency to handle a surge of political violence or hate fueled violence when that when it's driven by misinformation that is believed by millions and millions of people.
Speaker 2: She says now that members of the public are engaging in violent extremist acts, it's a far greater challenge for law enforcement to prevent and to counter.
Speaker 7: It's no longer just on the fringes when you're talking about people in the mainstream spontaneously taking up violent action for a political goal, and I know everyone in my field is watching the year to come with a lot of concern.
Speaker 2: Although she says she believes the prosecutions in the January 6th investigation have degraded the ability of extremist groups to organize mass mobilizations, professor Miller Idris says that the focus must expand to addressing the root causes of extremism where radical beliefs originate.
Speaker 7: We put almost all of our eggs in the basket of Department of Justice and and think that the security side of it will solve it. It has to be there, but so does the Department of Education. You know, agencies that work with youth, that work with the elderly, that work with digital and media literacy.
Speaker 1: I would like to have an ability to counter this disinformation that led us there. It's incredibly frustrating.
Speaker 2: Sandy has seen the effects of disinformation firsthand in her own family.
Speaker 1: I haven't spoken to a few of my cousins since January 6th because they, support it. We're we're divided, and I don't know how to pull us back together. I don't know how it's gonna change.
Speaker 2: For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Judy Woodruff in Washington DC.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NewsHour @FBI @ryanjreilly https://t.co/Osu7MbWdd0
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
The #SeditionHunters don’t want the American 🇺🇸 people and/or the new DOJ FBI or Trump admin to come after them or expose them The greatest political persecution in 🇺🇸 in our lifetimes… They seek mercy when then gave none to grandmas They wanted fame… give it to them https://t.co/tUu0eZIsVD
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NewsHour @FBI @ryanjreilly https://t.co/UA9JKNH7Pa
reSee.it AI Summary
I encountered Patti Morrissey, CEO of Global Foresight Strategies, in Old Town Alexandria, where she aggressively confronted me after I expressed my political views. Despite her extensive background in national security and connections to Senator Tim Kaine, her behavior was shocking. Many have pointed out her history as a two-time Democratic candidate and her controversial past actions. It's clear that her political affiliations and personal beliefs have sparked significant reactions from those around her.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
The white liberal woman who accosted @annetta_of in Old Town Alexandria, VA is Patti Morrissey, CEO of Global Foresight Strategies Retired DoD, State, ODNI Federal employee Patricia is a longtime @timkaine donor & former (unsuccessful) @vademocrats candidate for State House
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 Patti Morrissey of Global Foresight Strategies confirms that she is the one accosting @annetta_of in the cafe in Virginia
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @annetta_of Patti Morrissey @pattimor2011 also should be identified as a TDS victim… But perhaps more importantly, a friend of Senator @timkaine
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @annetta_of @timkaine You can tell Patti Morrissey is an angry white liberal cat lady by her donations too… This is the typical NoVA federal employee (now retired)… sucking off the neocon war industry and keeping Dems like @timkaine in power to send your kids to war
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @annetta_of @timkaine
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
This unhinged liberal @AlexVADems woman berated this black woman at @TatteBakery in Old Town Alexandria This is literally the neighbors and clientele of @vademocrats Senator @MarkWarner … who lives only blocks away No doubt she has Kaine & Ukraine 🇺🇦 flags on her townhome
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @annetta_of @timkaine Note… the staff of the bakery in Old Town Alexandria is actually @bakery_tatte
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @annetta_of @timkaine @bakery_tatte You can tell a business by its founders and employees… @pattimor2011 is the crazy Northern Virginia lady in the video… And GFS’ Director of Operations, Emily @emilybarwinczak … is the TDS victim from NC
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
36 years of national security experience under Patti Morrissey’s belt… and her GFS company’s PowerPoint slides & presentation look like a high school student threw it together… “We have to make the case for Ukraine 🇺🇦 that we have to do more than just send them stuff!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to do more for Ukraine than just provide supplies. While sending aid is essential, we must engage in a broader strategic campaign to effectively combat the war. It's important to understand Russia's objectives, which include degrading Ukraine's military capabilities through various means. By analyzing these tactics, we can better identify countermeasures, articulate our needs, and communicate shortfalls to the international community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Make the case that we have to do more for for Ukraine than just send them stuff. Sending them stuff is critical, but there is a larger strategic campaign that we need to get on board and and actually fight that war. And I don't think we're doing such a great job. And this another way of depicting how to think through, like, what is it that Russia is trying to do? So they're trying to degrade Ukrainian military capability, and they're using different tools.
And this just allows us to see a little bit further in what specifically are they doing in in these different areas, so we can have a little more precision about countering, identifying requirements, and then articulating the shortfalls to, the international community.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Patti Morrissey, when not shouting at black women in Alexandria, VA… is a Vindman family fangirl, a Dr. Fauci disciple, and as we all know… a national security and information warfare expert
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @timkaine Oh dear… deranged liberal Patti Morrissey’s GFS Director of Operations… @emilybarwinczak … is her daughter… She’s sent that TDS down range to the next generation and still has to employ them too!
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @timkaine @emilybarwinczak 2003: as 32nd district Delegate candidate, Democrat Patti Morrissey paid for a survey that referred to FBI raids against Muslim homes & businesses in Fairfax and Loudoun… accusing GOP candidates of taking terrorist 💰 This angered Muslim Virginians https://m.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2003/oct/21/morrisseymitchell-poll-angers-muslims
Morrissey/Mitchell Poll Angers Muslims | Ellington
m.connectionnewspapers.com
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@pattimor2011 @timkaine @emilybarwinczak Patti Morrissey @pattimor2011 is a 2x defeated @vademocrats candidate in Virginia’s 32 HD in 2001 & 2003 https://t.co/fmNUyMzvDP
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Kerry Alberti is a 79yo living in Richmond VA suburbs, renting an apt for < $2000 per month She allegedly has 22,619 Dem donations since ‘19, for $839,466 in 592 days Utter fraud (ID theft) via @actblue Yet ~$1K likely legit state @VA_GOP donations. AGs like @JasonMiyaresVA 🦗 https://t.co/KJFIe8V6R1
@ProjectVirginia - Virginia Project
Ghost donor problem. Data thanks to the esteemed @PeterBernegger One Virginia donor. 22,619 transactions totaling $839,466.00. $37.11 average donation. This donor probably donated to one thing once, with the rest being identity theft by an unknown actor. https://t.co/7wVAUbQOch
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Ray Epps: 1) First at breach of @uscapitol grounds at Peace Monument (yellow) 2) First at beach at lower Capitol steps (red), and 3) First at beach at upper plaza steps (blue) Assaulted👮♂️ w giant sign thrown on👮♂️ Called/recruited ppl 2 go into Capitol Jan 5+6 Still free https://t.co/nbfXfhlAT4
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol building to make our voices heard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voice
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
2/2 Finally, 2 put @uscapitol East side breach together, let’s watch the CCTV 🎥 with all of these actions in mind, & witness the lack of law enforcement presence & preparedness The lack of 👮♂️ & security measures seems deliberate … there was literally 0 chance at crowd control https://t.co/EdBUXay7IS
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
1/2 Finally, 2 put @uscapitol East side breach together, let’s watch the CCTV 🎥 with all of these actions in mind, & witness the lack of law enforcement presence & preparedness The lack of 👮♂️ & security measures seems deliberate … there was literally 0 chance at crowd control https://t.co/J3ysTcE9hq
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Let’s watch the NE @uscapitol fence line break again, and then you can see the East plaza side breakthrough next Consider how few @CapitolPolice and @DCPoliceDept are present compared to the number of protesters This was embarrassing security, @uscapitol completely unprepared https://t.co/uXioPwZPBY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the expectations for a small robot in December.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні ше очікуванням міді столом здебільшого невеликий роботі грудні
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
First, let’s see the NE corner fall from the ground level The green mesh fence and metal posts are torn down first, flooding protestors to the corner More arrive from Constitution Ave; just a few protestors - like always - attempt and succeed at breaking the 👮♂️ fence line https://t.co/npW0Rs8KXO
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Now… 2nd important part of the Northeast corner of the @uscapitol The lack of @CapitolPolice & @DCPoliceDept on the NE corner will break the 👮♂️ line… THEN, when protesters on East plaza of @uscapitol see NE breakthrough, THEY’RE inspired & push through Capitol Steps taken https://t.co/X4A7dbNCvI
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Somehow @January6thCmte missed 🎥: @DCPoliceDept using shields & kicks 2 knock down woman on steps She gets back up 2 top step only 2 have 👮♂️shove her down ENTIRE flight of stairs… THAT’s what makes crowd angry She gets up only 2b pepper sprayed directly in 👀 🎩@FormerFeds https://t.co/AJejjIJwaE
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Nichols & Steve, two Oath Keepers and others would go into the @uscapitol at the request of a desperate @CapitolPolice lieutenant and rescue 15 riot-gear-clad officers and one uniformed officer trapped inside You won’t hear that from @January6thCmte https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-retired-police-sergeant-oath-keeper-helped-rescue-capitol-police-on-jan-6-at-the-moment-the-world-needed-it_4811330.html
EXCLUSIVE: Retired Police Sergeant, Oath Keeper Helped Rescue Capitol Police on Jan. 6 'At the Moment the World Needed It'
theepochtimes.com
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@DCPoliceDept body cam 🎥 of Ray Epps parading back & forth on @uscapitol steps, organizing & trying to direct/ redirect protesters on Jan 6 His back primarily to👮♂️, cool & calm Ray Epps is an unindicted free man; @January6thCmte & @AdamKinzinger’s model citizen 🎩 @FormerFeds https://t.co/KLK4skiYFX
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Stories @January6thCmte withheld: @CapitolPolice👮♂️Tarik Johnson & Oath Keeper Michael Nichols lead trapped USCP officers out of Capitol Lies of @libradunn Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Pt3) @TPC4USA https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3544429/capitol-police-were-sacrificial-pawns-on-jan-6-part-3
Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Part 3)
As I’ve detailed in Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, The United States Capitol Police (USCP) frontline officers were purposefully blindsided by the events of January 6, 2021. Their leadership withheld vital intel, as well as information about the legally permitted events to take place that day on the Capitol lawn. Emerging from that day’s riotous melee were both heroes and villains. As we have become painfully aware over the last three years, what is force-fed us by our government officials and their sycophant media sources is far too often the exact opposite of the truth.This story is yet another such example . . . (Editorial Note: After I initially published this article, I was contacted by former USCP Lt. Tarik Johnson to make one important clarification to the story. Something which occurred before he rescued the 16 officers from the Capitol Building Rotunda area with the help of two Oath Keepers. He explained that was his second attempt to extract those trapped officers. His first attempt was initiated with the assistance of USCP Civil Disturbance Unit (CDU) officers, but the officers they were attempting to evacuate may not have been able to hear his directions because of the crowd noise in the Rotunda area. It was also during that first rescue attempt that a protestor put the red MAGA hat on his head, which then drew international attention to his story.) At 2:58 pm on January 6, 2021, USCP officer Lt. Tarik Johnson, having just completed the evacuation of the House of Representatives chamber, radioed the Command Center:“All right. Sir, I think the House side is totally clear.”A couple of minutes later, a USCP officer identifying himself as “Unit Motor 13” radioed a distress call:“We have about half a dozen officers that are trapped between hundreds of people and the Rotunda doors that cannot get out. The crowd is very hostile and we need additional officers here, hardened platoons with munitions to be able to clear these steps. It's an officer safety issue.”Having received no response for assistance, Motor 13 issued another distress call:“. . . on the center Rotunda steps we have approximately, maybe 13 officers up here. None of us are in hard gear. We have a few -- we have about a half dozen officers that are trapped between the Rotunda door and the crowd.”Hearing those messages, Lt. Johnson asked for the operator to patch him direct to Motor 13. Receiving confirmation for his request, Lt. Johnson radioed an instruction to that officer:“Just walk through the crowd and be friendly and walk out yourself. They’ll probably let you out. And advise the situation as you're walking through and be nice. But they'll probably let you out. Just be nice and walk down the steps.”This might seem an unusual directive, but Lt. Johnson had been moving back and forth through the growing crowd of protestors inside the Capitol — having successfully initiated the evacuation of both the Senate and House chambers — for almost an hour. Something in his demeanor was allowing him to pass through these protestors without eliciting aggression or impedance, even from the more hostile of those filling up the Capitol Building.By contrast, during this same period, USCP Officer Harry Dunn was having an opposite experience with protestors. This was despite the fact Dunn was carrying an M4 automatic rifle. At 2:39 pm, he was captured on a DC Metropolitan Police officer’s bodycam, screaming at and threatening protestors in The Crypt:“You’ll be finished, in one f-cking minute. You’re f-cking hurting us. Get the f-ck out of here. Get the f-ck out of here. You’re hurting us. You’re hurting us.”Dunn was quickly approached by a USCP captain who put his hand on Dunn’s shoulder, imploring him to calm down.USCP Captain rushing over to calm down Officer Harry Dunn in the Crypt room of the US Capitol Building (Source: DC Metro Police bodycam)In an interview that I recently conducted with another, unnamed USCP officer who has reached out to me with his own J6 story, he shared that officer Dunn was assigned as his Field Training Officer (FTO) when he graduated from the USCP Academy. Part of the training he received from Dunn was in “de-escalation” tactics when dealing with unruly protestors. In that phone interview, I played for the unnamed officer the audio quoted above. The officer responded:“Wow. That’s the exact opposite behavior for which he trained me.” After Lt. Johnson’s suggested behavior for Motor 13 and his group, to successfully extract themselves from their tenuous position in the mob, Motor 13 responded:“I don’t believe that's the situation considering a couple of us have already been pepper sprayed by personnel in the crowd. I don't believe that's the situation right now.”Beginning to consider how he would take action to rescue these officers who were “trapped” — in Motor 13’s own words — Lt. Johnson radioed:“Does anyone have a bullhorn that I could use? I need a bullhorn. Any arrest kits anywhere close and I’ll go get it.”The Operator responds to Lt. Johnson:“Simulcasting for 405-J, [Lt. Johnson’s call sign] I’ve got 20 ATF and FBI [tactical units] at the speaker’s lobby, where do you want them?”Lt. Johnson replies: “South barricade, I’ll meet them at the south barricade.”Operator: “They're already at the center, Speaker's lobby sir.”Johnson: “Are they in the building already, you said?”Operator: “They affirm, at Speaker's lobby. Johnson: “Have them meet me at the Senate door, tell them to come back out of the building, we're going to go get the officers on the Rotunda steps.”Minutes go by with no response from the ATF and FBI tactical units. Lt. Johnson again radios a request for a bullhorn:“I need a Unit to get me a bullhorn. I need the FBI Unit or whatever responding units to meet me at the Senate door. Right now the demonstrators aren’t . . . protestors they're not hitting anybody, they're not doing anything to harm anybody. I need a bullhorn, I will use those officers and I will walk through the crowd and I will get them myself and we will do so safely. I just need a bullhorn. Can I get any Unit to get me a bullhorn? Bring it outside the Senate door. That's all I need. A bullhorn and those officers.”At some point during these radio exchanges, Lt. Johnson managed to acquire and don a red Make America Great Again ball cap. As Joe Hanneman of The Epoch Times reported, “Johnson said wearing the MAGA cap made the crowds more receptive to him, provided a level of safety that he likened to a tactical helmet, and served as a de-escalation tool.”Frustrated that he’s getting no response from the tactical teams, his additional calls for other units, and the bullhorn, Lt. Johnson again takes matters into his own hands. “Again,” because over an hour earlier Johnson had similar frustration when seeking permission from Assistant Chief Yoganada Pittman to evacuate both the Senate and House chambers, receiving no responses. As he told The Epoch Times:“I begged for help all day on Jan. 6, 2021, and I feel I was largely ignored . . . There was no response from anybody at the Command Center,” Johnson said. “I say even before I initiated evacuation, I say specifically, ‘We’ve got to start thinking about getting the people out before we don’t have a chance to.’ I heard no response. Then I asked for permission to evacuate. I heard no response.”Lt. Johnson radios:“Stand by, stand down, stand down. I'm going to go get them. Stand down.”Motor 13 responds:“Just be advised, you may also want to know that there's a window up here on the Center Rotunda steps, on the north side of the door, a window that has been breached. And if we leave this area they're going to have free reign to walk into the Capitol from this window.”Johnson:“I don't care if they go into the Capitol, they’ve got 1,500 people in the Capitol already. The only thing I'm concerned about is getting the officers off of the stairs. I just need a bullhorn and don't . . . thank you I got a bullhorn.”At this point, Lt. Johnson goes radio silent and encounters two Oath Keepers, one of whom was retired New York Police Sgt. Michael Nichols. This unfolding scene was famously captured by videographer Rico La Starza.From Starza’s video, we can hear the exchange in which the two Oath Keepers identify themselves to Johnson, and ask him how they can help. “If you guys can help me save some of the guys. If you can help me get aside these people, I’d appreciate it. I just need to get these other officers out. They’re scared. We’re getting beat up, but the people who didn’t go for help are laughing at us,” Johnson said.US Capitol Police Lt. Tarik Johnson with Oath Keepers “Steve” (center) and Michael Nichols outside of Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. (Source: Rico La Starza via The Epoch Times)Oath Keeper Michael Nichols shows his badge to Johnson and says, “I can do that. I can help,” said Nichols. Johnson then handed Nichols the bullhorn he’d acquired, and Nichols says, “All right, let’s go,” and begins heading toward the east stairs of the Capitol Building. Reaching the bottom of the stairs, Johnson says to Nichols, “Just let me hold onto you.” “We’re Here. We’ve Got You,” Nichols responds, as he takes the lead, with Johnson following — holding the hand of Nichols — and the second Oath Keeper taking the rear position with his hand on Johnson’s back.At 3:11 pm, the trio ascends the steps approaching the east side Columbus doors as one of them announces, “We’re Oath Keepers. Stand aside. Make a hole. We’re Oath Keepers.” The protestors part and allow them to pass. 31 minutes earlier — at 2:40 pm — the now infamous “Stack One” of Oath Keepers had already entered through those historic Columbus doors. Among this particular group of Oath Keepers were those now convicted of a wide range of felony charges in the first of three Oath Keepers trials. Included in this stack was Ken Harrelson, who was the first of the Oath Keepers to encounter USCP Officer Harry Dunn, who had just raced to the top of the Rotunda stairs carrying his M4 rifle. Highly distressed, Dunn shouted at Harrelson, “Officers down!”Harrelson: “Really?”Harrelson and the other Oath Keepers had not seen or even heard of any violence against law enforcement up to this point. Harrelson had been engaged in a security detail, escorting a group of VIPs from The Ellipse, some of whom were scheduled to speak at a stage on the Capitol grounds. An event that had been legally permitted by the Capitol Police weeks before January 6 . . . before the December 19, 2020 announcement of President Trump’s speech at The Ellipse.Harrelson’s protectees were led from The Ellipse to the Capitol’s east lawn without incident, navigating thousands of rally attendees who were moving toward the Capitol for the many scheduled speeches and marches to take place that afternoon. They arrived several minutes before protesters began breaching those east-side barricades and running toward the Capitol’s steps. Harrelson, nor any other Oath Keeper participated in that breach, only moving in the direction of the Capitol after police had been ordered to withdraw and those barricades had been removed. Even after taking a position on the Capitol steps, waiting for other Oath Keepers to arrive while singing the National Anthem along with the crowd, Harrelson had not witnessed any violence. When he finally moved with the surging throng through the Columbus doors, there was no longer any resistance from the small group of USCP officers at the doorway.Dunn continued:“Yes . . . [inaudible] . . . ‘em out on stretchers. They are f-cking us up . . . [inaudible]. Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Jessica Watkins, and Ken Harrelson (L to R) take a positionbetween January 6 protestors and USCP Officer Harry Dunn (in back) (Source: Unknown)Harrelson and three other Oath Keepers immediately took up position between officer Dunn and the more agitated and unruly protestors. They stand side by side, with their backs turned to Dunn, facing the protestors. Publicly available videos capture this crucial event. At one point, Harrelson can be seen using both extended arms to hold back protestors from Dunn’s position at the top of the staircase. Several eyewitness accounts attest to the fact this small group of Oath Keepers de-escalated an extremely volatile situation, as some of those protesters being kept from Dunn were taunting him, calling him a variety of names.One protestor shouted at Dunn, “You’re a bully. You’re a bully with a badge!” Others can be heard chanting, “Oathbreaker! Oathbreaker.”Keeping those more hostile elements of the crowd away from Dunn probably saved lives, as the highly-distressed officer was near a breaking point. Within only a few minutes, hard unit officers arrived at the top of the staircase and led Dunn away.Oath Keeper Ken Harrelson holds back unruly protestors, keeping them awayfrom USCP Officer Harry Dunn (Source: Stephen Horn)There was one word not heard or captured on video being chanted by any of those protestors. The “N-word.”In Officer Dunn’s many press interviews, in his FBI interviews, and in his testimony before the January 6 House Select Committee, Dunn often repeated the claim that he had been called the N-word by many protestors. There were multiple variations of the same story he repeated, but in a podcast interview by The New York Times reporter, Michael Barbaro, Dunn explained:“I can’t fight nobody else. I can’t. I’m tired. And it’s like 30, or 40, 50 people. I can’t fight y’all. Let’s talk, man. So they started talking about how Joe Biden didn’t win the election . . . And I said I voted for Joe Biden. Does my vote not count?“And then — and then that’s when the girl said, ‘You hear that? This n-word voted for Joe Biden, guys.’ And then the whole 20, 30, 40, 50 people that were there said, ‘this n-word voted for Joe Biden. Boo!’”Except, in what was probably the most recorded event in human history, with at least one out of three protestors holding their cell phone cameras aloft, there has been no video or audio evidence presented that this racist, N-word chant ever took place on January 6.In one of my face-to-face meetings with Lt. Tarik Johnson, he was accompanied by another, now-retired USCP officer. (Dunn, Johnson, and this unnamed officer are all black men.) I asked the two about that story Officer Dunn had repeated so many times.The unnamed officer stopped me, “Are you asking me if anyone called Dunn a n-gger that day?”“Yes.”“Never happened,” he resolutely responded.Another story by The New York Times related how many USCP officers were not thrilled with Dunn constantly sharing the N-word story in his many press interviews. “To some, when Dunn talked about the racism he endured on Jan. 6, he made it sound as if it was ‘all about race.’”During my interview with the unnamed USCP officer first mentioned in this story, he went into further detail about his relationship with Dunn during the 12 weeks in which Dunn was his FTO. Dunn “seemed like a good guy, very professional, and down to earth,” but “he always had a way of bringing racism or black culture into conversations.”This officer went on to tell me, “We lost our relationship after January 6. He [Dunn] even deleted me from social media. That is the general feeling throughout the force.”Another telling revelation in my interview with this unnamed USCP officer was the fact he also had a rather low opinion of Lt. Johnson, despite that they don’t personally know one another. This comes from the fact that two officers in his unit were part of the 16 rescued by Johnson and the two Oath Keepers. They had relayed to this officer that Johnson had unnecessarily “endangered them” by escorting them through the crowd of protesters. According to this officer, his unit members did not feel “trapped” or “unsafe” in their location near the Rotunda doors.What those two
thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@SpeakerPelosi’s own daughter thinks the DOJ prosecutions of Jan 6 protesters is outrageous… for doing nothing
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Jan 6 defendants and whistleblowers continue to have civil rights abuses - DC District Court penalizing 🇺🇸citizens from speaking with @GOP members of Congress
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Fed prosecutors asked District Judge Bates 2 have Jan 6 defendant & police beating victim @Vis4Victorious jailed bc she met w GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill He barred her from appearing @uscapitol or congressional offices unless she gets permission from Pretrial Services Link👇 https://t.co/j8YrAJbJxk
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Incredible 🧵 Multiple undercover DOJ officers in DC n Jan 6 on new @DCPoliceDept body camera footage Check out @FreeStateWill 👇 Were these 👮♂️ at @uscapitol … or inside?
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
On Jan 6 @CapitolPolice behind front lines stood above & sprayed likely pepper balls into the crowd U can see they knew it was ineffective & useless A female👮♂️blasts crowd below w fellow @CapitolPolice👮♂️right in line of fire🔫 It’s like @CapitolPolice role playing Call of Duty https://t.co/SC3CwloDiX
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Ray Epps was in the crowd who helped lift up the Trump sign & push it into the line of police 👮♂️ on the West side of @uscapitol ~1:40 pm (original 🎥 by Just Another Channel & Savanah Hernandez) CBS News’ @MacFarlaneNews has yet 2 interview Epps, a free & protected man https://t.co/hvcbyDL0fK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss various names and numbers, but it is difficult to understand the context or meaning behind their words. They mention names like Angela, Anton, and Andrey, as well as the phrase "pension angel oil." There is also a mention of someone being 68 years old. The conversation seems to revolve around a master or resident named Chen, who may have come to a location called "Pip." However, without further information, it is challenging to provide a concise summary of the video's content.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Чен пенсії ангел олії антон антон антон анґела чен андрій ангеліна черги анґела олії євро
Speaker 1: щепили андрій 68
Speaker 0: зовні рот чен майстер чен жителька прийшов майстер розташоване піп пі чен пенсії ангел олії антон
Speaker 1: антон антон
Speaker 0: анґела чен андрій ангеліна черги
Speaker 1: анґела олії євро щепили андрій 68
Speaker 0: зовні рот чен майстер чен жителька прийшов майстер розташоване піп пі
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Capitol Police Chief Sund revealed in an interview with Tucker Carlson that the FBI had intelligence on the expected violence on January 6 but did not share it with the Capitol Police. Sund also disclosed that Acting Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley considered closing DC but never informed the Capitol Police. Sund further discussed how General Milley used an intel platform to warn Congress members about threats but did not inform the Capitol Police. Sund's requests for National Guard assistance were denied by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms, who needed permission from Speaker Pelosi and Leader McConnell. It took Pelosi 71 minutes to approve the request after the first breach. Sund also revealed that Speaker Pelosi was off-limits for the January 6th Committee's inquiry. The intelligence that existed before January 6 was not passed to the Capitol Police. The Department of Defense delayed sending the National Guard due to optics, and they arrived after the situation was under control. The FBI did not share information about domestic terrorists coming to DC for January 6. Sund criticized Pelosi for calling for his resignation and installing Yogananda Pittman as Acting Chief. Pittman failed to provide Jan 6 intel and received a vote of no confidence. Sund emphasized that the events on January 6 could have been prevented, and the response was mishandled. He also highlighted the disparity between the treatment of the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson interviews former head of @CapitolPolice on Jan 6, @ChiefSund Sund reveals @FBIWFO Director Steven D’Antuono had intel on expected Jan 6 violence for DAYS leading up to rally FBI shared NOTHING with @CapitolPolice Keep in mind, FBI had dozens of CHSes embedded
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals that during conference calls before the Capitol attack, no one discussed the intelligence regarding the storming of the Capitol or the potential harm to members of Congress and police officers. They mention a call on January 5th with law enforcement leaders, including the FBI and National Guard, where no one mentioned any concerns about the attack or threats. Other police chiefs, like Robert Conte, also claim they were unaware of the threats. The speaker highlights reports of emails and memos sent to the FBI and FBI director, Steve D'Antuano, predicting violence, yet nothing was mentioned during their video call. The lack of communication and awareness is perplexing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the intelligence that was coming up talking about the stormy of the capital, killing members of Congress, or killing my police officers was ever discussed in those, the conference calls that I was on at least. And think of this. And so you never heard that? Never heard it. And then
Speaker 1: But how could you not have I mean, I don't work in a federal bureaucracy, but that doesn't seem to make at all.
Speaker 0: It doesn't make sense. Think about this. On January 5th, the day before the attack at 1 PM, I think it's 1 or noon, I had a conference call with the leaders of all the law enforcement, Conti from, Metropolitan Police Department, Steve D'Antuano, the, director of the Washington field office for the FBI. Nobody from DHS was on. I'd I hadn't thought about that, but all the law enforcement that was down there.
I had the military district of Washington general Omar Jones on the phone with me. I had the, head of the National Guard, William Walker, general William Walker on the call. It was a call I coordinated. Not 1 person on that call talked about any concerns for the the intelligence, the attack on the Capitol, the threats to officers, that we were seeing that was out there. That's what's that's what's scary.
And and but to
Speaker 1: be clear, do we now know for a fact that the people on that call knew about those threats and didn't mention them to you?
Speaker 0: So this is what we know, for a fact. And I'll tell you, I'm not the only chief that was in the dark. You you look at Robert Conte, head of the largest police department in Washington DC. He also said the same thing. He wasn't getting the same notifications like the Norfolk memo that came out the day before.
He didn't get it. So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI. FBI director. You look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. As the GAO report or the maybe and no.
It's a senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antuano on Sunday, Monday, and some prior Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday, and nothing said about it. I I mean, that's not a word. Not a word.
Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that just does not make sense.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson with head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund Sund reveals acting @SecDef Miller & @thejointstaff GEN Milley were so concerned of violence, they considered closing DC & revoking permits EXCEPT they never told @CapitolPolice & Miller ordered @NationalGuard to be unarmed https://t.co/d2EcZNGsq2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States military, including Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley, discussed locking down Washington DC due to concerns of violence at the Capitol on January 6th. They considered revoking permits for demonstrations on Capitol Hill. However, I, the one who issues these permits, was not informed. Instead, on January 4th, Miller restricted the National Guard from carrying any weapons or civil disobedience equipment, which doesn't make sense. So, the military expresses worry about potential violence but simultaneously limits the National Guard's ability to take an aggressive stance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller, and acting in, general, Milley, had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th on Sunday and Monday. They had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations? I do. You know, who wasn't told?
Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller do? He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying the various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very, demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Wait, wait. So the military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we war, considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't Adopt an aggressive posture.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard Former head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund, discusses WaPo reporter story on GEN Milley using @Dataminr intel platform to identify & warn members of Congress about possible threats Milley DIDN’T tell @CapitolPolice “This was handled differently… like they wanted it watered down” https://t.co/J2HTF9YfNU
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley was found to be using an intelligence platform called DataMiner, which he used to gather information about potential threats to Congress and the US Capitol. However, he did not share this intelligence with the Chief of Police or other relevant authorities. The Chief of Police expresses concern about not being informed, as it is their duty to take necessary action. They discuss how this handling of intelligence differs from previous protests and suggest that the intelligence may have been intentionally downplayed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Military. General Milley, you know, we're now now finding out, and it's not not for me. This is from Carol Lenny, you know, investigative reporter with the Washington Post, has found that he was using DataMiner on his own, coming across intelligence
Speaker 1: Tell us what DataMiner is.
Speaker 0: So DataMiner is an intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would have on their computer. I I guess it goes in and does, crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform. He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States capital. And he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Leonning writes about in her book.
That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he's there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so So I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Speaker 1: Again, What could possibly be the explanation for that?
Speaker 0: I'm not really sure. People are
Speaker 1: You've done this for over 30 years. You're very familiar. You've been in law enforcement in DC specifically for over 30 years. So you know how the city runs. You know how the federal agencies respond to protests.
This is not the 1st violent protest.
Speaker 0: Not at all.
Speaker 1: There have been many.
Speaker 0: I've I've done many national special security events and this was handled differently. No, you know, the intelligence, no jib, no coordination, No, discussion in advance. It's almost like they wanted it to be watered down. The intelligence would be watered down for some reason.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard @Dataminr @TuckerCarlson & head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund: Sund reveals he was turned down 2x by House & Senate Sergeant at Arms for Nat’l Guard, starting Jan 3 SGT at Arms need permission from @SpeakerPelosi & @LeaderMcConnell Why? “Optics & lack of intel;” but FBI & DoD had intel https://t.co/LhGs83muPL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress passed a law (2 US, code 1970) requiring approval from the Capitol Police Board and congressional leadership in advance for bringing in national guard or federal assistance. The speaker's request for approval was denied twice by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively. The denial was due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The speaker finds it unbelievable that they are the only chief of police with a law controlling their ability to protect the capital, even in emergencies. They highlight the absurdity of having to seek approval from the same individuals during an attack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congress passed the law. It's 2 US, code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th, that requires me to go and get approval for bringing in national guard or federal assistance in advance.
I have to go to the capitol police board and get approval from congressional leadership advance, like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that. May I ask you a question? Who made that decision?
Who denied you? I was denied by Paul Irving, house sergeant arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. On January 3rd Who do they work for? It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was his number one boss, and then McConnell on the senate side. So then Effectively, Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi shut down your request.
My request was shut down, 1, because of because of optics, is interesting. You're gonna hear that term come up a couple more times. Optics over the look of the National Guard on the hill. But yeah. And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me.
Not just regulations, rules that say, I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national park, a law. That's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the National Guard to be brought in.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@TuckerCarlson @ChiefSund @SecDef @thejointstaff @CapitolPolice @NationalGuard @Dataminr @SpeakerPelosi @LeaderMcConnell @TuckerCarlson & head of USCP on Jan 6, @ChiefSund 🚨SHOCKING: Sund reveals after 1st breach at 12:53pm, he calls House Sergeant at Arms for Nat’l Guard help; “I’ll run it up chain [to @SpeakerPelosi]” It took 71 mins for Pelosi to approve, 2:09pm Sund made 11 follow up calls https://t.co/gRabl3QY9q
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 12:53, the speaker called the Washington DC Police Department for assistance. They requested additional resources on Constitution Avenue to prevent an attack. At 12:58, the speaker called the sergeant in arms for help and a declaration of emergency. They were told to wait for authorization from higher-ups. Over the next 71 minutes, the speaker made 32 calls to various agencies, including the Secret Service. Despite not having official approval, they requested assistance to protect their team. Finally, at 2:09, 71 minutes later, the speaker received approval and immediately informed their colleague. They were frustrated by the delay and marked the time as 2:10.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I talked to their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank God I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him, said, hey, please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front, Start attack.
It was gonna be bad. 12:58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the the military immediately in Federal Resources.
I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna run it to
Speaker 0: the chain.
Speaker 1: Is Pelosi?
Speaker 0: The chain his his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stinger.
He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed
Speaker 1: to us on the wet front. I need federal resources. He says, what did Paul tell you? Said he's running
Speaker 0: up the changes. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So For the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center.
I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval. But I'm looking at my men and women having their Just hand it to him.
And and my first thought was, fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the one tech secret service turned over.
You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their chief Sullivan and myself. Thank God for him.
Speaker 1: I don't so So you make this call immediately to the House Sergeant Arm, who reports Mr. Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi, he says, I'll call Pelosi. He says, I'm a
Speaker 0: run it up the chain. Run it
Speaker 1: up the chain, but that is the chain.
Speaker 0: Now here now here, I got you on this. I wanna tell you exactly
Speaker 1: what's happening. What happens then? Does he get back to you?
Speaker 0: So over the next 71 minutes, it makes the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from From 2001, they have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call in the next 51 minutes going, where are we on the approval? Where are we in the approval?
Just any minute now. Any minute. I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that.
71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stinger, say we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant, that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 210.
I I finally got approval for the National Guard. It was that mad
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Former @CapitolPolice Chief Sund spoke to @January6thCmte in person. The House & Senate Sergeant at Arms did not. @ChiefSund reveals that Democrat @BennieGThompson mandated that @SpeakerPelosi was OFF LIMITS for @January6thCmte … no records, no inquiry Extraordinary cover up https://t.co/9Oxo9jFhLg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th was a pivotal moment. The person who made that decision has not answered why. Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits to the inquiries of the January 6th committee. However, if we truly want to find out what happened, everyone's records should be examined. The speaker emphasizes that they have been forthright and provided their phone records. They made numerous calls to request approval and called multiple police agencies and officers to help regain control of the Capitol. The speaker's recollection is detailed and precise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it that's a pivotal moment on that day.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And we know the name of the man who made that decision, and we'd still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question?
Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question specifically that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six committee coming out, I think it was representative Bennie Thompson that had said, Speaker Pelosi is off limits. So they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you
Speaker 0: mean she's off limits?
Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that her coming into this was she was off limits To the inquiries of the Janier City.
Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day.
Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. I mean, if we're truly trying to get to the bottom Trying to find out what happened.
Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, it's insane.
Speaker 1: You know, you would be getting everyone's records. I've been forthright. All my phone records have been turned over. And like I said, there's a description of all the numerous calls I made requesting approval. Think about it.
In that's in that 71 minutes, I called in 17 police agencies, seventeen 100 officers to help us get the capital back. And they also made those 11 calls trying to find out where You
Speaker 0: were as precise as an airline pilot in your recollection of things. So yes, I
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi Former USCP @ChiefSund details the litany of that intelligence that existed before January 6, ALL of which was NOT passed to @CapitolPolice in a single assessment… “My [USCP] intelligence unit is putting out docs on 4, 5, 6th, indicating a low probability of civil disobedience” https://t.co/7J0n8Sw2bU
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker mentions various pieces of intelligence that were not included in assessments regarding the Capitol attack. These include plans to harm palace guards, use chemicals at entry points, burn down the Supreme Court, attack members of Congress, and storm the building. The speaker's intelligence unit even released documents indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. Speaker 1 suggests that certain agencies may have allowed the chaos at the Capitol to serve their political purposes and prevented the speaker from stopping it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, when you look back and you see some of the intel that was out there, and I referenced a lot of it in the book. There's intel talking about going up and killing the palace guards. Those are those are my officers. There are Intel talking about, you know, using chemicals at some of the entry points. There there's Intel indicating that they've done surveillance on some of the entry points, at the capitol.
None of that's been included. They talk about burning down the supreme court. They talk about different attacks on different members of congress. And they they talk about storming the building. Not a single word of that is included in any of the intelligence assessments.
And a matter of fact, My intelligence unit is putting out documents on the 4th, 5th, and 6th indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. What? Yeah. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you were and I'm not. But if you were conspiracy minded, you might think that certain agencies Concluded there was likely to be chaos at the capitol, and that served their political purposes, and so they let it happen, and they prevented you from stopping it.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi Jan 6, 2:34pm: @CapitolPolice’s @ChiefSund gets on phone with MPD Chief, @MayorBowser & @DeptofDefense DoD doesn’t like “optics” of NG on Capitol, despite Sund’s URGENT plea Takes “shots fired!” notice of Ashli Babbitt’s death to move DoD DC NG diverts; doesn’t show until 6pm https://t.co/fYHXGfiTdG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a phone call with Lieutenant General Pyot Pyot and General Flynn, where they discuss the urgent need for the National Guard at the Capitol. However, General Pyot expresses concern about the optics of having the National Guard present. The speaker emphasizes the dire situation and the denial of assistance, leading to frustration. They mention the shooting of Ashley Babbit and the delayed arrival of the National Guard at 6 PM. The speaker also highlights the fact that resources were sent to protect the homes of other generals but not theirs. They suggest that this systematic denial of support raises suspicions and could lead to conspiracy theories. The conversation ends with a discussion about the lack of intelligence and the politically charged nature of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon. I have to sell my request to the National Guard. I'm on the call with a lieutenant general Pyot Pyot, trying to make sure I have his, name pronounced right, and a, General Flynn is on the call. And it's mainly that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti's on the call, and I said, I need the National Guard immediately.
This is an urgent, urgent situation. Still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. I need the National Guard immediately.
You Know what his response is? Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Right? He goes, I'd rather have your officers in the fight and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option.
All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard. You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death.
I need assistance immediately. And I still remember, he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on.
You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying them. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. And he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather backfill your people.
I said, sir, I don't have that option.
Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does.
Speaker 0: It gets better. So big and big, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Right then I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Babbit.
And I said, we have shots fired. I still remember yelling over the phone, we shots fired on the USCI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta go start making a notification. I gotta call the, sergeant arms saying, hey, we got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting.
Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to Pyatt that are within eyesight of the capital. You know what they do with them?
They put them in vehicles, drive them around the capital back to the DC army. You know where the DC army is.
Speaker 1: It's far away.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equated his on the other side. RFK Stadium. Yeah. I'll go by RFK Stadium.
They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening troops. Not real. Can you freaking believe it? No, that's real. That's real.
And you know what else I do? While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to got general's houses protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not a conspiracy, you know, conspiracy theorist, but I could see where people began to go down that rabbit hole real quick.
Speaker 1: That rabbit hole, I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic Denial of intelligence and then of support Mhmm. Defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
Speaker 0: Right. Multiple agencies with people with extensive experience, and you're getting this type of response. You know, and when you look at the level of intelligence, it's baffling that nobody put anything out ahead of time.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not baffling. I mean, remember, this was the end of the Trump administration. You know, a month almost 2 months 2 months into a contested election. This is a politically charged moment with ramifications that we're now living through, but, there's a lot at stake here. This is not just your average protest.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense USCP @ChiefSund to @TuckerCarlson: By the time DC @NationalGuard show up to US Capitol, they’re not needed, “The fight’s over” DCNG take “optics” photos with Capitol behind them; DoD claims victory & appropriate action New Jersey State Police arrive on scene BEFORE the DCNG🤦 https://t.co/0yKQHo7TUu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Guard arrived at 6 PM, but by then the fight was already over. They were concerned about the optics of their arrival, so they lined up with shields and took pictures for military magazines. The New Jersey State Police actually reached the Capitol before the DC National Guard, which infuriated the Guard. They were not allowed to respond and were upset about it. The Pentagon celebrated the guardsmen who arrived at 6 PM as heroes, but they also sent guardsmen to protect the homes of generals. The Department of Defense released a report saying the military's actions were appropriate, but no one apologized for the delayed response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Amen. So, by the time the National Guard actually show up at 6 PM, they're not needed. Correct?
Speaker 1: The fight the fight's over. So the whole time, they were concerned they were concerned about the optics of the National Guard showing up. They show up, I have to my I have an official swaraman as special police officers. They take them, they line them up with their shields. All the protesters are off, they line them up shields and they take a couple of pictures for military magazines and stuff like that of them lined up with the Capitol in the background.
Very optics they said they were so concerned about.
Speaker 0: They took pictures from military magazine? Think about it. You can
Speaker 1: look it up. You can look it up on some of the, go online, look it up.
Speaker 0: Like, We're the Heroes of January 6?
Speaker 1: We're the Heroes of January. Yeah. So, you know and I appreciate my men I come from a military family. I appreciate the men and women in in, military. And I will tell you when they finally showed up, New Jersey state police beat them to the capitol before the DC National Guard arrived at the capitol.
I had DC National Guard's men and women that were infuriated. They were so pissed off that they weren't allowed to respond. They were extremely upset. Wait. Cops drove from New Jersey before the National Guard can get
Speaker 0: from the armory on Capitol Hill to the capitol?
Speaker 1: I put out a request, a mutual aid request that went All up and down the, national capital region went up to why isn't this story everywhere? I have no idea. I have no idea. General Walker even said he he called me up. He said, Steve, I felt so bad.
I pulled up on the scene. He's the head of the DC National Guard. He said, I pulled up on the scene, and the, New Jersey State Police beat us to the capitol. He said he wasn't allowed to go. He repeatedly wanted to go, and the Pentagon wasn't allowed.
Speaker 0: And yet the Pentagon celebrated the guardsmen who showed up at 6 PM when everything was done as heroes, meanwhile, they did they send other guardsmen to protect the homes of generals.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They send other resources. I don't know if they're guard or or depending on force protection or what. But The kicker is this. The Department of Defense, and they interviewed me.
I I would've been interviewed by anybody. I because I I'm telling the truth. They interviewed me. I provided them all my phone records. They were part of the all all the records.
You know, they put out a report saying the actions of the United States military was appropriate considering the circumstances, was appropriate? It's it's online. Yeah. Go look up the No one apologized. No one apologized.
They said their actions fired. Their actions were appropriate. They had an emergency response authority under DISCA to respond immediately, and they didn't.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard Here’s the “optics” glamour photos @ChiefSund spoke about: @DeptofDefense ensured DC @NationalGuard arrived, late, to US Capitol with riot shields, despite protesters already gone DoD waited hours to send NG because they’re worried about “optics,” yet that’s 💯 what they got https://t.co/gvdxEvg2Pw
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard USCP @ChiefSund reveals FBI didn’t share they’re tracking 18 “domestic terrorists” coming to DC for Jan 6 Recalls ex-FBI Jill Sanborn’s testimony to @January6thCmte that revealed FBI took “overt” action to prevent people from coming to DC Had to be feds in crowd for police work https://t.co/6kWVt7TsJg
Video Transcript AI Summary
I received a call from someone in Great Britain asking about federal agents in the crowd. I denied their presence, assuming I would have been informed. However, later I learned that there were indeed federal agents present. This was confirmed by Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021, where she mentioned the FBI taking overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6th event in DC. In February 2023, a GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists on January 3rd, which increased to 18 or 19 by January 6th. It's reasonable to have resources and multiple agents for such a situation, but it's concerning that this information wasn't shared in intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I get a call from overseas, and it say it's press. I don't remember which one it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they start asking me about feds in the crowd. And I was like, well, no.
I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau.
They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, thinking about that and Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action to keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over. That's a big that's a big deal.
Fast forward to February of this year 2023, and the GAO report that says, on January 4th January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that were talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR area of responsibility. By by January 6th, they were tracking 18 or 19th in the GAO report, domestic terrorists. So think about that. They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming this event. So, of course, they're going to have resources on them.
And they're not, you know, you're not going to be just putting 1 agent. You're going to have multiple. So it'd be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had come So that would be regular standard police work. So I I wouldn't be surprised by that, but not to share that in the intelligence?
That's concerning. So
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard Former USCP @ChiefSund describes Jan 7, Pelosi calls for resignation, lies about him & installs USCP Intel, Yogananda Pittman, as Acting Chief Pittman failed to give Jan 6 intel; gets vote of no confidence Gets 💵 as @UCBerkeley Police Chief, right across from Pelosi’s district https://t.co/j7x8NbnSTt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi blamed Capitol Police leadership and called for my resignation on national TV the day after we gained control of the capital. Yogananda Pittman, who was the head of intelligence for Capitol Police, was then appointed as acting chief. However, she received a vote of no confidence from the police officers due to their dissatisfaction with the events. Pittman is now the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, located near Pelosi's district. It seems that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by Capitol Police. Many whistleblowers within the unit were punished and forced to resign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very next day, in less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the, capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief.
Speaker 1: But Yogananda Pittman, you just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, which again doesn't seem like a failure, it seems very intentional to me, But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible. Correct? Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway?
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's an intelligence failure and my thing is do a proper analysis, you know. You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence, so she didn't get the position from the, from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. Where where did she wind up?
Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting.
Speaker 1: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district.
Speaker 0: That is correct.
Speaker 1: In the Bay Area.
Speaker 0: That is correct.
Speaker 1: So you just kinda take the Bay Bridge over there, and that's Yeah. That's where she is now. What does that position pay? Do you know?
Speaker 0: I think it pays, pays pretty well. There was, you know Pays extraordinarily well. No. I'm sure it pays. I'm sure it pays pretty good.
It's it's interesting. There was a hearing just recently, that was on it's on TV. You can look at it. Where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position. It turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave, so she could leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the Capitol Police for months later.
Speaker 1: Oh, so you should get the benefits.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, you know, and nobody allegedly
Speaker 1: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which demonstrably didn't have the intelligence it needed to protect the building, that person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across from Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley.
Speaker 0: That is correct. And I will say this.
Speaker 1: So that looks like a reward to me.
Speaker 0: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence. And I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became wheel whistleblowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign.
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard @UCBerkeley Former @CapitolPolice Chief Sund’s overview of the events on Jan 6, 2021: “This didn’t have to happen. This was screwed up from the get go. Numerous opportunities from preventing it to happen; preventing my men & women from going through what they had to, and it never happened.” https://t.co/o0EjyguGEb
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have 30 years of experience in law enforcement, dealing with various situations like capturing homicide suspects and handling barricade situations. This incident was completely avoidable and mishandled right from the start. There were multiple chances to prevent it, but unfortunately, they were not taken. My main concern is the well-being of my fellow officers, who had to go through this unnecessary ordeal. It is disheartening that there was never an opportunity to stop this unfortunate chain of events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In law enforcement for 30 years. I've done everything from capturing homicide suspects to doing, you know, barricade situations. This didn't have to happen. This was screwed up from the get go. Didn't have to happen.
Numerous opportunities to prevent it from happening. Numerous I think it's from printing bringing my men and women from going through what they had to, and it never happened. There was never that opportunity to stop that train. Have
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
@CapitolPolice @January6thCmte @ChiefSund @BennieGThompson @SpeakerPelosi @MayorBowser @DeptofDefense @TuckerCarlson @NationalGuard @UCBerkeley Lastly from USCP @ChiefSund to @TuckerCarlson “2020 riots vs Jan 6 attack… @DCPoliceDept was prevented from going on @WhiteHouse grounds & helping @SecretService” likely @MayorBowser More cops injured at 2020 WH riot than Jan 6 All 2020 charges dropped, per US Park Police https://t.co/Xlq33IGPO0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the impact of politics on law enforcement. They mention the 2020 riots and the January 6th attack on the White House. They highlight the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House during the riots and the dropping of charges against protesters. They express concern about the politicization of justice and speculate on how things might have been different if Barack Obama had been president. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that hypothetical questions are difficult to answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does seem like things have changed, and it does seem like
Speaker 1: politics affect the way we enforce the law. Does it feel a way to you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Again, you know, one of the that's one of the things that many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus The 20 the the January 6th attack.
Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House, where famously Saint John's Church was set on fire.
Speaker 2: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress, specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom.
It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. Therefore prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service and defending the the White House. So think about that. You know, who made that decision?
Again, all I know is, you know, Mnuchin's hands were tied. So Baer Bauser? Higher? I don't know.
Speaker 1: But think about that. Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Well that more officers were injured If that riot, then we're injured on January 6th, I think.
Speaker 2: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. GAO report. More officers injured at the protest By the White House and on January 6th, and I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped according to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House, there were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there.
There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Han Adams Hotel on fire That was occupied. Think about that. Charges dropped.
No no such situation. I mean, When you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that. And that's what appears to have I
Speaker 1: mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different. Don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington DC Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House?
Speaker 2: Again, I don't protect the White House? I don't I see what you're saying there. I don't know. I mean, I think not.
Speaker 1: Look. I mean, it's a I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem