TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NobodymrRobert
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
You might not want to see 👀 this..... https://t.co/iNmPZubA1Z
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
🤔 hmmmm WOW " JUST WHEN YOU THINK YOU HAVE SEEN IT ALL. NOPE THIS 👇 https://t.co/iUVQNqV3uq
Video Transcript AI Summary
These mausoleums in Cuyahoga, Sinaloa, are dedicated to cartel bosses. These tombs are built like Egyptian pharaohs' tombs, but they hold narco kingpins. Each boss tried to outdo their competitors by building larger mausoleums. The cartel has so much money that they build million-dollar mansions to be buried in. These monuments are for some of the most evil people in Sinaloa, Mexico, and are supported by a corrupt government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been to some crazy places before, but this has to be up there as one of the craziest. This is a cemetery. These are all mausoleums dedicated to cartel bosses in Cuyahoga, Sinaloa. These aren't houses. These are mausoleums, tombs, like the tombs of Egypt for the pharaohs, except these hold the narco kingpins, and each one built larger to one up their competitors.
It truly is unbelievable. The amount of money that the cartel makes, they have so much money, they don't even know what to do with it to the point where they build million dollar mansions to be buried in, monuments to some of the most evil people that have ever walked the earth here in Sinaloa, Mexico, all propped up by a government that's as corrupt as they are.
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
Florida State university Shooting. The woman who was walked by and filmed by a unknown person while sipping on a drink appears to be alive. https://t.co/z53CAveR8P
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
TRUMP Really knows how to answer a question asked by fake news. https://t.co/SWc9eFP5Tk
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual, a citizen of El Salvador, was illegally in the United States and was returned to his country of origin. The exception is Venezuela, which was refusing to take people back.
The foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president, not by a court. No court has a right to conduct foreign policy. The Supreme Court said no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function. The administration won a case nine to zero, but CNN is portraying it as a loss because they want foreign terrorists in the country. President Trump's policy is that foreign terrorists who are here illegally get expelled.
The president was asked why he doesn't just say it's wonderful that criminals are being kept out of the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sick these are sick people. Was wondering if you have something to say. Yeah. I mean, Steve and I minded it. I don't understand what the confusion is.
This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to this country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin except except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back in places like that. I can tell you this, mister president. No.
The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct a foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple. The court specifically said it couldn't be sent back to El
Speaker 1: Salvador. Point. The supreme court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function in United States. We want a case nine zero, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss as usual because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children. But president Trump, his policy is foreign terrorists that are here illegally get expelled from the country, which by the way is a ninety ten issue.
Speaker 0: Well, the president mister president, you said that if the supreme court said someone needed to be returned, that you would abide by that. You said that on your first one just a few days ago. And they said have to answer this question. Why don't you just say, isn't it wonderful that we're keeping criminals out of our country? Why can't you just say that?
What's a legal Why do you go home and go home and go And that's why nobody watches you anymore. You know, you have no credibility.
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
BREAKING BAD" Prisoners Break out of jail And make a video while doing it. " How did we get here 👇 https://t.co/W8YQr5qKSl
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE. Mocking Birds " TIME TO DEFUND FAKE NEWS. SERIOUSLY DO YOU AGREE YES" NO " https://t.co/dV8TtbHurS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss an alleged conspiracy, with one speaker claiming Wikipedia is a deep state operation. One speaker likens political actions to acting, asserting there's a script, action, and editing involved. They highlight Elon Musk and a chainsaw as an example. Politicians are repeating the same talking points from a script like actors. The speaker questions why senators are paid to repeat talking points and suggests politicians are interchangeable, not portraying themselves as free-thinking individuals with original ideas. They express disbelief that this behavior garners support, finding it horrifying that politicians repeat each other mindlessly like drones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is an alleged conspiracy, says Wikipedia, which is also a deep state operation, but this is alleged. But then here's a video to follow it up.
Speaker 1: It's exactly like acting. There's a script, and that's the truth.
Speaker 0: And that is the truth. And that is the truth. And that is the truth.
Speaker 1: There's action involved. That's what you just saw. That's what you just saw.
Speaker 0: That's what you just saw. That's what you just saw.
Speaker 1: There's editing involved. It has all the same exact clips. Elon Musk to literally take a chainsaw. Elon Musk take a literal chainsaw.
Speaker 0: Literally take a chainsaw. Elon Musk take a chainsaw. The chainsaw. His buddy Elon Musk. Elon Musk take
Speaker 1: a The chainsaw. It's exactly what actors do. They get a script. They read it in front of a camera on cue. They do the actions.
I mean, that's how these people are not considered actors and yet politicians is really hilarious at this point. But it speaks to something else that has happened to people's minds. Because this shouldn't be working on anyone, I guess, is what I'm thinking. Right? Like, this should not be garnering support from anybody to see this.
It should be horrifying that they're all just repeating each other mindlessly like drones in some hive mind. Why would we need senators getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to just repeat the same talking points as each other from a script like actors? These people are not acting like individuals who have been voted to represent anybody. The these people are acting like they're interchangeable with one another. You could swap one out for another one.
It doesn't even matter. These are not they're they're not portraying themselves as free thinking people who have ideas to bring to the conversation. They all have the same idea, and it wasn't even their original idea.
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
Student Refused to take his MAGA Hat off... https://t.co/ioStUvVVUS
Video Transcript AI Summary
A student is asked to remove their hat to remain in class. The teacher states there are no hats allowed, regardless of what the hat says.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need to take that hat off if you'd like to remain in my class. What? There's no hat on hat? Hat off if you wanna remain in my take the hat off We're in history. You okay.
I don't you or regardless of whatever the hat says, there's no hats allowed in the
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
@RealAlexJones Has anyone noticed. The left doesn't seem happy. https://t.co/mikaazMpWL
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
DEI IS NO MORE " THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN " THEY DONT WANT DEI NO WAY. LEAD " FOLLOW " OR GET OUT OF THE WAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO MORE DEI " RIP DEI https://t.co/oTZlDI23qF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The judiciary you crafted over the past four years does not reflect America, lacking diversity, particularly with no black judges and over 90% identifying as Christians. You previously wrote that judges should not be ethically constrained from participating in protests supporting equal justice. Have you ever attended a protest as a sitting judge?
I do not believe I have. You mentioned Girls Inc., but you claim not to know their policies, despite being on their board until recently. Your reports suggest significant financial contributions to them.
Despite your political beliefs, can you assure us they won't influence your judicial opinions? The best evidence of my judicial approach is my past performance, prioritizing the law over personal beliefs.
Do you believe in Bigfoot? Your time is expired, Senator.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The these are your words, not mine. The judiciary crafted over the past 4 years does not look like America. Not one of these judges is black, and more than 90% were raised or currently identify as Christians. I don't know how you knew that. And then you say, quote, your words, not mine.
Identity is the lens that filters everything and everyone we encounter, end quote. Did I read that correctly?
Speaker 1: Again, I don't know because I don't have the article in fact. I do. I got it right here.
Speaker 0: You wrote another article on July 31, 2020 for the San Francisco Daily Journal in which you advocate for the right of sitting judges to be able to go to protests, didn't you?
Speaker 1: That is incorrect.
Speaker 0: No. It's not. I'm looking at right here. This is what you say. No judge should be ethic your words, not mine.
You just said you didn't say them. You turned these articles over. No judge should be ethically constrained from speaking or taking action that reinforces that constitutional and moral imperative. May judges participate in demonstrations that denounce racism, support equal justice, and reinforce our constitutional rights to free speech and peaceable assembly? Yes, end quote.
Did I read that correctly?
Speaker 1: I don't know because I don't have the article in front of me.
Speaker 0: You you you if you're a federal judge, you're go are you gonna go to protests?
Speaker 1: I would like I would like to answer the substance of your of the underlying question that was asked.
Speaker 0: I don't like you to answer my question. I've only got another minute or so.
Speaker 1: If you're a federal have you let me put it let
Speaker 0: me put it another way. Have you ever gone to a a protest, a public protest, while you're a sitting judge?
Speaker 1: Senator Kennedy, the article that you are referring to is to a protest
Speaker 0: while you're a sitting judge?
Speaker 1: I do not believe that I have ever attended a protest as a sitting judge or perhaps ever in my life. Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: And and you talk about Girls Inc. You say you've never heard of them. You're on the or or you or you don't know that much about them. You're you're more on the board from 2014 to the 2024. You're still on their board, aren't you?
Speaker 1: I'm not. My term expired this last month. And and you've given
Speaker 0: them over $50,000, haven't you?
Speaker 1: I do not believe that is correct.
Speaker 0: That's what your report says. And this is this is the this is the same Girls Inc that says, quote, on its website. Here's how they define girls. Quote, girls refers to gender expansive youth, cis girls, trans girls, non binary youth, gender nonconforming youth, genderqueer youth, and any self any girl identified youth. Did I read that correctly?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I've never heard of that policy or that definition. You never heard of that.
Speaker 0: Listen. In in spite of your I mean, can I just have 30 more seconds? In spite of your strongly held political beliefs, and we've got all of them, all your articles, they're long as long as King Kong's are. Are you telling us today do you believe that you will not allow your your strongly held political belief to influence your judicial opinions? Is that
Speaker 1: do you believe that? The best evidence of the type of federal judge I will be is the type of judge
Speaker 0: that? Do you believe that? He's the
Speaker 1: type of judge I have been for 10 years. He was one who always puts the law above my personal Do you also believe in Bigfoot?
Speaker 0: Do you believe in the tooth fairy?
Speaker 1: Your time is expired, Senator. Do you
Speaker 0: believe Jimmy Hoffa died of natural causes?
Speaker 1: Senator Roanoke. Thank you, Mr.
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
WARNING ⚠️WARNING ⚠️ STAY IN LINE https://t.co/mvNI0akj9S
Video Transcript AI Summary
Just left the Oklahoma County election board at 9 AM after waiting since 7:30. The line is huge, stretching all the way around and to the back. It took 90 minutes to get through. Get out and vote!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bro, I just left the Oklahoma County election board. It's 9 o'clock on the dot. I've been here since 7:30. Look at this. Look at this line.
And then it goes down all the way around, and then goes to the back, And then there's a line there. 90 minutes. Get out and do it.
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
Former Democratic campaign worker breaks Silence "" speaks out after attending the DNC .. Let's do a deep dive inside the DNC " and 👀 see what's really happening.. Right here 👇 https://t.co/24o93FWnyP
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
JD VANCE " WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND. https://t.co/hd89PwVmOY
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
@RealAlexJones Is that somebody on the tower https://t.co/3VyBWGj3XZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking at a more recent chart to see what has happened. They point out that the current chart is outdated and suggest focusing on more recent data for a clearer picture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hold that chart. That chart's a couple of months old. And if you wanna really see something they said, take a look at what happened. Hold that chart. That chart's a couple of months old.
And if you, wanna really see something they said, take a look at what happened. That chart that chart's a couple of
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
@CollinRugg What's the shooter doing in this video 👇 https://t.co/VVP5o3oVZh
Video Transcript AI Summary
I teach economics in Pittsburgh, PA. Financial well-being means being able to do what I love. I hope to be remembered for making my school a special place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lalla. I teach UPE in honors economics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Financial well-being to me is knowing that I can be free to do the things that I love to do. I hope when I retire someday, they say, that guy made this place a special place to come to school. As much as you could, you know,
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
Scranton Pennsylvania Welcomes Biden. 🤣 https://t.co/epjjQ41Jz4
@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 The Philippines Government committee votes in favor to launch investigation into over 327,000 unexplained excess deaths between 2021 and 2022. Nothing can stop what's coming https://t.co/jHKLouUdpA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a resolution regarding the alarming number of excess deaths in the country. They share data showing 262,000 deaths in 2021 and 67,000 deaths in 2022, all of which are unexplained. The committee agrees to conduct an investigation into this issue, specifically focusing on the 213,984 excess deaths. The motion is approved, and they move on to the next item on the agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The copy of the, said, resolution. This is about a 260,000, excess deaths that we experienced in this country. We'll be showing a graph, coming from the Philippines statistics, authority. And, SO DOH copies that have been submitted, datas. And, we are shocked, to find out that there were 262,000 deaths on 2021 alone.
And after that, 2022 67,000 deaths, and these are all, unexplained deaths. No? And that's the reason why this committee is, I think, Motopropio, we will be investigating this, this, issue. So Mister, I moved to, to conduct for the for this issue. Yes, sir.
So there's a motion that to conduct a, investigation on this, issue, concerning the 213,984 excess debts, and this is duly 2nd debt. Any objection? Hearing none. The said motion is now approved. Okay.
So we'll be proceeding to the next item of our and, you have