TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NotRadix
@NotRadix - Radix Verum ☦︎
My most recent video is up! I think you'll find it very interesting. https://t.co/kkk90InqpS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses Samuel Arms, who is allegedly linked to both the Matt Gaetz allegations and the Proud Boys seditious conspiracy case. Arms reportedly co-founded Government Blockchain Systems LLC with Joel Greenberg, who is serving an 11-year sentence for public corruption. Greenberg's alleged fraudulent claims are the origin of the allegations against Gaetz. Arms also authored the "1776 Returns" document that was digitally planted on Enrique Tarrio's phone, who is serving two decades in federal prison.
Arms' background includes being "groomed" for intelligence roles and learning Arabic in Jerusalem, potentially as an informant. He worked at USSOCOM and the State Department. While in Jerusalem, he claims he snuck into Palestine. Arms denies involvement with the "1776 Returns" document after sharing it, but Erica Flores testified that he was the sole author and asked her to send it to Tarrio. Arms has not been charged in either the Greenberg or Proud Boys cases. He is involved in crypto, AI, and political lobbying, and his website shows a picture of him with Ron DeSantis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. Welcome back to the channel. We have an interesting video today. Apparently, some new information has come out that links the same intelligence connected individual to the allegations against Matt Gaetz, but also the criminal case, the seditious conspiracy case against, the leader of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio. And this individual appears to be an asset for foreign intelligence.
So this is a crazy, crazy story. Let's go ahead and get into it. So today, investigate j six, tweeted out incoming attorney general Matt Gates was set up by the same government agent from MacDill Air Force Base who wrote the 1776 returns blueprint for, blueprint that was digitally planted on a on Enrique Tarrio's phone. Tarrio is serving two decades in federal prison for the day of infamy in January, and he was not even there. So in response to that, Ken Silva says, wow.
The guy who wrote the seventeen seventy six manifesto is an Israeli intelligence asset, and and he's responding to a threat here by Haley Jane. She says some interesting details about the case from former Seminole County tax collector Joel Greenberg from whom the allegations against Gates originated. Greenberg, now serving an eleven year sentence for various public corruption crimes, facilitated part of his embezzlement scheme through something called Government Blockchain Systems LLC, a company he cofounded in July 2019 with the then 22 year old Samuel Arms. Arms had recently graduated from FSU where he participated in a training program that included a stint in Jerusalem to learn Arabic so he could, quote, maybe be an informant in The Middle East. He described the program as having groomed him for intelligence roles with agencies like the CIA or the FBI, a background he attributes to his involvement in crypto.
The program aimed to prepare him to, quote, become a member of the feds upon graduation, which is when he reportedly first met and became involved with Greenberg in 2018. Shortly after, in early twenty nineteen, Greenberg hired this kid, Arms, to set up a Bitcoin operation at the Seminole County tax office, a venture that later became part of Greenberg's legal troubles. Let's do a big think. This operation in part contributed to the criminal charges against Greenberg and by extension, the allegations against Gates. These allegations originating, of course, from mister Greenberg who is known for a pattern of making fraudulent claims, came as part of his bid to secure a reduced sentence.
Here is Arms discussing how he was, quote, groomed for intelligence roles before his involvement with Greenberg.
Speaker 1: Because that was one of the things that I went to school for is I was being groomed to be in intel agencies, which is also, like, part of my background with crypto, but, like, I
Speaker 0: Isn't that interesting? So who who are you representing in your work on crypto? Are you representing a government agency, potentially more than one?
Speaker 1: Did work at USSOCOM, which is United States Special Operations. I worked at the State Department, right, all throughout college. I got sent to Jerusalem to learn Arabic so that I could be in The Middle East, right, and maybe be an informant.
Speaker 0: Was it at that time, mister Arms, that you were approached by Israeli intelligence and recruited? Just wondering.
Speaker 1: Right. And what's super funny is while I was in Jerusalem, I actually snuck into Palestine, which was not allowed at all.
Speaker 0: Oh, is that what happened? You just snuck in. Right? Interesting. Interesting.
Speaker 1: And that that was incredible. Tell me about Jerusalem. That had to be interesting or different. It different. It was interesting.
Okay.
Speaker 0: So let's move on from there. The Greenberg case, of course, isn't the only one that Arms is tied to. In the day of infamy, seditious conspiracy case against a group called the Proud Boys, Arms was the author of a document that later became known as the seventeen seventy six returns document. Prosecutors used that document to bolster their claims that a conspiracy existed despite lacking actual evidence that the defendants had ever read or even opened this document. Arms later told the select committee he drafted the document as a result of his background at USF where he participated in numerous war gaming exercises.
According to Arms, this training, along with inspiration from a separate August 2020 publication by the Transition Integrity Project, led him to tinker with a Google document envisioning what could happen in a worst case scenario. Arms then shared the document with somebody who he claimed was an, like, an Internet friend, Erica Flores, a friend and ally from the crypto world who then sent it on to Enrique Tarrio. So you see the game being played here. While Arms denies any further involvement with the document after passing it on to Flores claiming she, quote, took his ideas as inspiration and her or some other group of people, like, modified the document, Flores testified to the select committee that Arms was the sole author of the document, and most importantly, he asked her specifically to send it to Tarrio. Like, hey.
You know, we want you to basically plant this on this person because that's what's happening. You know, when you're in these, like, telegram group chats, you're not paying attention to every single thing that every single person puts in there. This is part of the ways that they ended up kind of framing the Whitmer guys. Okay. And so these people may not have ever opened it, probably never saw it.
There's no evidence that they did. Neither Arms nor Flores have faced any criminal charges related to the day of infamy. Arms has also not been charged in connection with the Greenberg case. Court documents do not explicitly name him, but they reference the other individual who, alongside Greenberg, managed the blockchain company through which part of Greenberg's criminal activities were conducted. The document describes the individual's involvement as short lived ending after a September 2019 Orlando Sentinel article about government blockchain systems.
The entity Greenberg co funded with ARMS in July 2019 in response to that publicity. ARMS was removed from the entity. So that is interesting. Okay. So just a just a reminder that back in February of twenty twenty three, the great Ken Silva did report on this FBI CIA trained asset drafted the seventeen seventy six returns document.
That means the most damning document in this trial was authored by the intelligence community, someone groomed by the FBI itself. And isn't that interesting? Does that not always seem to be the case with this stuff? It always we always come back full circle, right back to the FBI. So there is this, interview here that is up on something called Stably, a YouTube channel.
It's some kind of fintech chat, it says, and this is Samuel Arms as the guest. Now this is from three years ago. He was working at a a crypto fund called Hyperion Decimus. It's very bizarre, but very interesting. You can listen to this yourself to get an idea for this this this kid.
And then here's his own website, samuelarms.com. It says strategic policy victories, Web three and AI, political lobbying for entities, and Web three crypto and AI. What about political lobbying on behalf of a foreign nation? Just wondering, here's a picture of him with Ron DeSantis. Very, very interesting.
Samuel Arms stands at the intersection of technology, politics, and innovation. His journey began with groundbreaking research. It's just groundbreaking for the United States Special Operations Command, red flag, where he delved into the intricacies of Bitcoin and counter threat finance, whatever that means. This, of course, led him to the state department contributing his expertise to shape crypto policy and blockchain tech initiatives. As the president of the Florida Blockchain Business Association, Samuel has been a pivotal force in legislative change on whose behalf.
His leadership has been the successful passage of five significant bills in the Florida legislator with the anti central bank digital currency bill marking a landmark achievement in his career. Samuel's influence extends beyond legislation at the helm of three gates, his political strategy consulting firm. He blends a strategic mindset with an acute understanding of both the traditional and digital realms. His approach is not just about adapting to the evolving landscape, but also about shaping it. Samuel's strategies are rooted in deep comprehension of web three's potential to transform political and business landscapes, proven leadership, they say, and blockchain innovation and policy advocacy.
So this is just very, very disturbing, very interesting. And I would I would ask this young man, Samuel, to explain himself. I would like to know how is he seemingly connected to both of these cases in playing kind of like the pivotal role, and what exactly is his relationship with that foreign country in The Middle East, but I'm interested to know what you guys think. That's all for now, guys.
Speaker 1: Say thanks for watching my video. Have a good day. Wee.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1990, a Kuwaiti girl's testimony about Iraqi soldiers committing atrocities helped push the US into the Gulf War. Her claims of babies being ripped from incubators were later proven false, exposing propaganda motives. Amnesty International and Kuwaiti evacuees initially supported her testimony. It was revealed that she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador, and a PR firm orchestrated her testimony for "Citizens for a Free Kuwait," receiving a hefty payment. In today's age of deep fakes and propaganda, it's crucial to remain skeptical, vet information, and avoid manipulation.
@NotRadix - Radix Verum
In October 1990 a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl gave chilling testimony to the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, recounting atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers. This was widely credited with helping propel the US into the first Gulf War. She testified babies were being ripped from incubators and left to die on the cold floor. Her claims were eventually exposed to be lies - refuted by contradictory evidence, exposing the motives behind the propaganda. But at the time she testified, her testimony was corroborated by Amnesty International, as well as evacuees from Kuwait. It turns out she wasn't just some regular Kuwaiti girl. She was the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the US. Her testimony was orchestrated by a big public relations firm Hill & Knowlton on behalf of a group called "Citizens for a Free Kuwait." The PR firm was paid as much as $12 million by the Kuwaitis for the campaign. _____________________ I mention this because I am surprised to see independent media not being more skeptical in the age of deep fakes, high tech propaganda, and psyops about claims and videos that are dropping all over social media, many of them not sourced. Some footage shared recently online was actually old footage from years ago that people share uncritically. I caution people to remain critical, to try to properly vet and source information, not allow yourself to be manipulated.
