reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @NuryVittachi

Posted - April 1, 2026 at 3:12 AM

Saved - April 2, 2026 at 4:10 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I describe a four-part Mossad plan sold to the US: manufacture a massacre narrative by fake Iranian NGOs; trigger peace negotiations; launch an in-and-out strike to topple Iran’s government; install a US puppet. It largely worked until Iranians united in anger over illegal attacks by Israel and the US, denying the fourth phase. The result: leadership not killed, anti-US sentiment soars, and Netanyahu’s image collapses.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The transcript describes a CIA-Mossad plot sold to the United States to instantly topple Iran, presented as a four-part narrative, with a single fatal flaw that derailed the plan. 1) A network of fake Iranian NGOs in the West would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, to manufacture consent for a war against Iran. The plan aimed to manipulate Western public opinion and policy. 2) The Americans would demand negotiations with the Iranians to distract them with peace talks, slowing any resistance while the broader strategy proceeded. 3) During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty. 4) Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, the NED, and others, would then take control of the country and install US puppet Reza Pallavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. The narrative claims this plan began in January, when Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition elements in Iran to launch a coup that caused widespread destruction: armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings, and 750 banks; 350 mosques were attacked, with no synagogues attacked. The insurrection resulted in more than 3,000 dead after the coup was suppressed. The fake NGOs in the West allegedly repackaged this as a massacre of 30,000 (or up to 50,000 or 70,000) peaceful protesters. Time magazine is cited as reporting 30,000 dead, with the funding for these NGOs allegedly traceable to Western political propaganda groups like the NED, a CIA offshoot. Part two allegedly went better than expected: the Americans successfully negotiated peace talks, and the Iranians made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. Part three allegedly followed perfectly: in a surprise unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader but 40 members of the Iranian government. The plan supposedly required part four—a transfer of power to a US-aligned opposition figure—but in practice the movement failed to gain traction. The fatal error occurred when there was a change of attitude in 2025 after Israel attacked Iran (June 13–24, 2025), killing nuclear scientists, politicians, civilians, and military personnel. This had sparked increased Iranian support for the government and opposition to the US and Israel. Mossad assumed many Iranians still opposed their government, but the opposite occurred: Iranians drew together and fought back, using UN-recognized rights to respond to the illegal attack and closing the Strait of Hormuz. Trump expressed mixed signals—talking about a quick resolution and also acknowledging ongoing conflict—leading to confusion about the plan’s duration. Netanyahu went into hiding amid rumors of his death. The plot failed to kill Iran’s leadership, and the US and Israel found themselves in a challenging position, with little public sympathy remaining for their efforts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran, but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put The United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win and is creating global panic over oil prices. The top secret dossier sold to The US by Mossad director David Barnier had a clear argument that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One, a network of fake Iranian NGOs in the West with circulated story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters. The story will be spread in order to manufacture consent for the West to launch a war against Iran. Two, the Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them by having them focusing on peace plans. Three, during this distraction, The US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty. Four radical extreme opposition members in Iran cultivated by Mossad, by the CIA, the NED, and so on, would then take control of the country and install US puppet Reza Pallavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly, except there's one key detail in one part that they got wrong, and that brought the whole edifice crashing down. The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings, and 750 banks. They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters, but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the West as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 by the regime. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here's Time magazine reporting that 30,000 people died. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to Western political propaganda groups And you such as the NED, a CIA spin off group. Part two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held peace negotiations, but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. The Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But The US and Israel decided to go ahead with part three. And you know what? That also worked perfectly from beginning to end. In a surprise unprovoked attack, The US and Israel killed not just the leader but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage. If any country took out the entire government of The UK or Germany or Canada or Australia, the world's media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. The Mossad CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was to achieve part four, the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaido figure, a man already selected and waiting in the wings. Now the western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness and tried to pretend that this was all the Iranians, but this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. Here's where the fatal error shows up. Mossad's plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June 13 and the twenty fourth in 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists and politicians and civilians as well as members of the armed forces. That was also That was clearly an illegal unprovoked attack. No Western leader cared, but the people of Iran, all the political parties did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and The United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away with it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically in the second half of last year because of that. Now Mossad assumed that because their contacts, who are the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, because they still opposed the government. They assumed that many Iranians did, but that was just not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government and opposed to The US and Israel, far more so than Mossad believed. Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you, signaling that part four should go ahead, a takeover by the opposition, people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But that didn't happen. Part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians instead drew together and fought back within the hour. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the Gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait Of Hormuz. Now Trump was horrified and furious, not with Iranians but with Bania and Netanyahu. This explains why he kept making contradictory statements. He kept saying things that implied the war be over very quickly as the original plan said while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. It was only the beginning. Remember how he used the phrase short term excursion? He also said the war would last four days only, and he also said the war was already over, and so on. But as we can see, it's still continuing today. We can see that the plan as sold to him was a quick in and out operation just as he'd done successfully in Venezuela. That was what he had in his head. Now Netanyahu, perhaps deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiraled out of control, seemed to go into hiding. He was so deep undercover that rumors circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There's an ancient saying that all plotters know. If you're gonna shoot at the king, you better kill the king. What The US and Israel did was to shoot the leadership of Iran, but they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they're in trouble. And you know what? I really don't think there's much sympathy for them. Peace.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

https://t.co/chfx0ENuBY

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@robert_l_gray The existence of the Mossad plan was shown by the NYT, MEE and others, not sure if you read them. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/22/us/politics/iran-israel-trump-netanyahu-mossad.html

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@SamRatio This is a very insightful comment, thank you, SamRatio

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@LaurieJone69617 @GenXGirl1994 So true, Laurie, the gap between the US people and its government is a chasm on this issue (and many others)

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@carlayeager22 You're probably right, Carla, I was assuming Netanyahu had human emotions, but he may well suffer from psychopathy

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@jazznojazz_1ppm But several other places (such as the UK and Australia) clearly sent military support

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@saxetor Well said, Bob. I read an interesting discussion in a CIA history about the gulf between the US's high moralistic statements, and the country's actual actions -- murders, wars, disinformation, conflict creation on a massive scale leading to huge numbers of deaths

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@TrueJus51847303 Thanks for the questions, True Justice. I know the US media likes to pretend everyone is an "Iran proxy" but the fact is that Hamas is not close to the Iranians. And you are sadly correct that US-Israel have the world's richest armies and can do more harm than the Iranian army

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@jbhubbard Good point, Jason. The UK and Australia both sent jets to help on the US-Israel side, but their contribution has been tentative at best, and other allies, notably Spain and South Korea, have expressed dismay

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@RyanPrentiss Yes, in a longer version of my post (the story deserves a book and a movie), the aspects you highlight, Ryan, have to be included

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@SocialMediaGod anecdote from anonymous source about one anonymous person doesn't overturn the main story. Mossad has admitted its part. Look at the video of what was actually happening - the destruction

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@Anonylyzer13 It's no secret that Mossad originated the plan for the US and Israel to take out Iran -- there are lots of references, including NYT. There is a good summary with no paywall at this link: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israels-mossad-promised-it-could-ignite-regime-change-iran-says-report

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@OccamsRaizer2 @GenXGirl1994 You are correct. When Trump budget cuts demolished the funding for many US propaganda NGOs, Marco Rubio personally reinstated the budget for the NED, the most dangerous one of all: they funded the HK riots, manipulate polls in Europe, and still manage the DPP in Taiwan, etc

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@CU49013306 Yes, I was sticking to the main thrust of the narrative, but the Iranians' smart action on the internet and Starlink will definitely feature in any longer version of this report

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@terryrus99 You're quite right, Terry, other agencies definitely cast doubt on Barnea's plan -- but it must have been Trump who made the final decision to go ahead with it

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@LisaWrites4 @MaryKostakidis Yes, absolutely correct, Lisa. The numbers of dead protesters in Iran distributed by the US-funded "human rights NGOs" were impossibly high. My British friends have a strange but memorable culinary metaphor for this: "They over-egged the pie."

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@Stuparker7 @MaryKostakidis Thanks for your comment, Stuart. I didn't put in all the sources because most of this story is actually well known - it just hasn't been neatly assembled as a narrative before. If you have time, read Hearst in the MEE: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/oops-we-have-wrecked-another-country

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

@TrueJus51847303 Good question, True Justice. I have friends who visited Iran last year. Many things (education, science) are world class, but 47 years of US sanctions has meant that public money is tight

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - January 15, 2026 at 4:45 AM

Saved - January 15, 2026 at 11:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read the claims of massive Iranian protests as produced by Western-backed outfits (NED, HRANA, CIHR Iran) run from abroad, with Masih Alinejad as the loud Western face. In reality, Iranians are less anti-government than before; Western media curates a “popular uprising” narrative and inflates women’s-rights stories to push regime change. Iranians deserve unbiased, on-the-ground reporting.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

20 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROTESTS IN IRAN 1. Allegations of “mass casualties” among Iran protesters are not dependable. They come from a group called Center for Human Rights in Iran. The Center for Human Rights in Iran is NOT in Iran. It is in New York. 2. Is it an Iranian group? No. It is financed by the CIA-adjacent National Endowment for Democracy in Washington DC and related bodies, specializing in disinformation. 3. It is led by the people of Iran? No. The chairwoman is Minky Worden, an American who ran anti-China campaigns for many years. She tried to get the Beijing winter Olympics renamed "the genocide Olympics" and cancelled. She failed. 4. Previously, Ms Worden worked closely with the Hong Kong "pro-democracy" movement (also NED-funded) and her husband was on the board of Apple Daily and had a contract with the Pentagon. Yes, the US regime-change operations around the world are THAT incestuous. 5. The other main source of unbelievable tales of massive protests and huge numbers of deaths in Iran are coming from the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA). This is also a NED-funded, US-based disinformation outlet. . IN REALITY, IRANIANS HAVE BECOME LESS ANTI-GOVERNMENT 6. Having said that, protest groups against the Iranian government do exist, but they are not large. Western groups including the NED-funded media, and the Persian service of Voice of America, have spent years cultivating anti-government groups. But Trump’s bombing campaigns, and Israel’s shocking behavior in Gaza, has meant Iranians have become very notably LESS anti-government, not more. This is important. . THE LOUDEST VOICE 7. The loudest and most prominent Iranian “protest leader” quoted in the west is Masih Alinejad, a women who was salaried by NED for years, and currently works for the US Agency for Global Media. 8. Which part of Iran does she live in? No part of Iran. She lives in the US. 9. What’s her professional background? Propaganda. Her job was and is to push pro-US anti-Iran propaganda through various media services. Despite this, she is quoted in the media as if she is a reliable source of news from the people of Iran. 10. Press reports show that between 2015 and 2022 alone, Masih Alinejad received US$628,000 in funding from NED and related groups. And yes, this regime-change campaigner received a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. . 'U.S. CAN CREATE A POPULAR UPRISING' 11. Remember Mahsa Jina Amini, a woman said to have been beaten to death by Iran police for wearing her hijab wrongly? Masih Alinejad pushed that tale, but it was debunked by a security video, which showed that no one was standing near her when she collapsed through a medical issue. 12. A 2009 Brookings policy paper "Which Path to Persia?" goes into detail about how the US can take control of Iran. The idea would be to create mobs attacking government facilities, which can be labelled a “popular uprising” by the media, and by fostering division in multiple ways and putting puppet leaders in control. Variations of this US game plan have been used multiple times around the world. . WOMEN'S RIGHTS 13. Why is so much of the US propaganda about Iran based on alleged violations of women’s rights? Because similar US disinformation operations in other places, such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, showed that women’s rights made western audiences angrier faster than weaponization of the usual western “Big Three” propaganda lines: Democracy, freedom and human rights. 14. Is the “strictly hijabs only” tale true? No. In general, women in Iran do prefer to dress modestly in Islamic fashion, but it’s far more relaxed and tolerant that the US propagandists pretend. Think of the religious dress codes of Indonesia and Malaysia, for example, where most people dress modestly and religiously, but the atmosphere is tolerant and reasonable. 15. What about the atrocity stories of ill-treated women? They are invented and circulated by US and Israeli sources: the US has long had an atrocity fabrication department (see AB Abram’s research for numerous examples of their work worldwide). . INFILTRATION 16. Academic essays apparently “proving” that most Iranians want a US-allied leadership appear in The Journal of Democracy – which is portrayed as if it was a university-style academic publication, but it's actually a NED magazine. 17. NED operatives have spent years in Iran, funding scholars and journalists to build up a stranglehold in many educational, civic and media groups, just as they did in Hong Kong, and have done in many places. 18. A widely quoted group from Iranian politics is the Foundation for Democracy in Iran. This is also not Iranian. It is funded by NED and the executive director is American activist Kenneth R. Timmerman. . HOPE FOR THE FUTURE 19. Iranians are smart. They know about NED and nickname it “National Enemy of Democracy”. 20. Western mainstream media reports (BBC, Guardian, Reuters etc) on Iran absolutely CANNOT be trusted. They have a long history of downplaying, or, more usually, completely hiding the western manipulation processes that create regime change. If you support the people of Iran, you need to know all this. The world needs to stand with Iran and tell the US that we've had enough.

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - January 8, 2026 at 1:54 AM

Saved - January 9, 2026 at 12:02 AM

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

BREAKING NEWS: The U.S. will withdraw from 66 organizations, isolating the country from the wider world, the White House announced today. https://t.co/R2h7gWMTR9

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - October 21, 2025 at 12:31 AM

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 7:12 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that unearthed documents claim MI6 sought to divide China into three, using Uyghur separatists and Grey Wolves, with a Turkish agent named Catli. The plan allegedly began in the 1990s, involved Gerald Segal’s map, CIA backing, and propaganda efforts. By 2004 East Turkistan was framed as a country, leading to attacks 2007–2014 and a Western push to reshape narratives about Tibet and Uyghurs in the 2010s. The story ends with ongoing claims.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

MI6 PLAN TO CUT CHINA INTO THREE COUNTRIES BREAKING NEWS: Unearthed documents show that MI6, the British spy service, planned to cut China into three separate countries. The British plan was formulated as recently as the 1990s—and part of it is STILL RUNNING NOW. This is an extraordinary story which researchers uncovered from historical documents, and which was presented at a university conference recently. Full details with sources are in the video report. Summary of 15 key points are below. 1.) In the early 1990s, agents at British spy agency MI6 consulted UK academic Gerald Segal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs on how to chop China into three countries. 2.) The UK’s key players would be Uyghur separatists. “Xinjiang has long been a target of British intelligence— with London hoping to manipulate the Uighur refugees from Xinjiang and Uighurs still there, into cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China…” (Journal of Strategic Studies). 3.) Enter a real-life secret agent—a Turkish man named Catli of the Grey Wolves, who shared MI6 goals in Xinjiang. A book about a related CIA venture called Operation Gladio said Catli “helped the Uyghurs… mount insurrectionary attacks that killed 162 people”. 4.) To understand this story, it’s vital to know that the west falsely presents an image of Xinjiang as a place where one ethnic group are prisoners and the other are oppressive overlords. Not true. In Xinjiang, people with Uyghur background can commonly be found as police officers, army soldiers, and local officials, including the ones right at the top—chairman of the regional government. 5.) In March 1992, the chairman of the regional government, Tomur Dawamat, issued a warning: “Hostile forces, both at home and abroad, have stepped up their infiltration, subversion and sabotage.” 6.) At the time, the CIA was backing separatist Isa Yusef Alptekin, another backer of the Grey Wolves. In a 1992 speech he said: "The time for collapse and dissolution has arrived for the Chinese empire.” 7.) The Americans gave his son Erkin Alptekin a job in US anti-China propaganda. In the 1990s, he worked for Radio Liberty, a US media propaganda unit, part of the Radio Free Asia cluster. 8.) By 1994, academic Gerald Segal had finished the map showing how to cut China into three countries. The US had already circulated stories of a “Tibetan genocide” to prepare for this. 9.) As part of their Central Asian program, the US had devoted hundreds of millions of dollars to get the mujahideen rebels to train groups of guerilla fighters. They added hundreds of Xinjiang separatists to join the training. (This project eventually backfired for the Americans – the central Asian guerilla groups they were financing give birth to al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Taliban.) 10.) Western forces worked further with secret agent Catli, who created more trouble in Central Asia and China. But he made lots of enemies and was killed in a suspicious car crash in Turkey in 1996. 11.) From 1996 to 2002, other agents continued to train Uyghur separatists in China, who went on to make multiple terrorist attacks. FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds later wrote: “Between 1996 and 2002, we, the United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every single uprising and terror-related scheme in Xinjiang.” (This US government denies this.) 12.) Problems arose for the western agents: UN data showed that the Tibetan population was growing faster than other Chinese groups– the opposite of a genocide. Also, there was also growing public knowledge that the “Tibet exiles/ Dalai Lama” project in India had been set up and financed by the CIA. So the “cut-China-into-three” plan became “cut-China-into-two”. 13.) In 2004, the US hosted the founding of East Turkistan as “a country”. For convenience, they decided to have the prime minister in Washington DC instead of China, selecting a man named Anwar Jusuf Turani from Fairfax, Virginia. The new “country” did not get international recognition by anyone – not even the United States! 14.) Between 2007 and 2014, there were a large number of terrorist attacks in China by members of the East Turkistan project the west had encouraged into being. In a 2009 operation, separatists used Facebook to co-ordinate a massive attack in which 197 people died. In another, a huge car bomb in Urumqi killed 43 people and wounded 94. At Kunming’s train station, an attack by eight knife-wielding terrorists killed 29 people and wounded 140. Xinjiang’s leaders, with help from the central government, sent in police officers and soldiers to halt the carnage—and, against extraordinary odds, succeeded. 15.) In the 20-teens, it was time for the Americans to use their superpower – narrative control. They needed to do three things: i) Get journalists and academics to cut all mentions of MI6 or CIA involvement in Chinese Uyghur stories. ii) Trick the public into seeing the terrorists who had killed so many innocent people as the oppressed victims. iii) Mislead everyone into believing that the authorities trying to stop the murder of innocents were the root cause of the problem. Creating this new, upside-down narrative may sound like a tall order – but, incredibly, they managed to attain all three goals. They did this by relentless circulation of mainstream media news reports which painted a picture in which “oppression” by “the Chinese” had “created” the violence. (See the video for detailed examples.) The US then organized a 2019 meeting in Washington to relaunch the debunked “Tibet genocide” narrative as a Uyghur genocide hoax. The story continues.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Chapter 1, the MI6 plot: In the early 1990s, MI6 consultants and academics debated lines to split China into three pieces. Gerald Siegel of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the UK was commissioned to map where the country should be chopped. Western journalists and researchers at the time acknowledged Western manipulation of a small portion of Xinjiang’s Uighur population, with the majority of Uighurs living peaceful agricultural lives. The plan targeted a small radicalized minority, a tactic attributed to the CIA and NED. A 1990s Western academic publication, Strategic Studies, stated that Xinjiang had long been a target of British intelligence and that London hoped to manipulate Uighur refugees into cannon fodder for plans to break up China. The document cited is academic rather than propaganda, noting London’s aim to destabilize China through Uighur separatists. Chapter 2, a secret agent: The MI6 effort included a secret agent, not a conventional Bond figure, who arrived in Xinjiang under multiple identities as Michael Nicholson, though his real name was Abdullah Chatlie (Chattley), a Turkish operative with Central Asian language skills. According to CIA histories on Gladio, Chatlie helped Uighurs mount attacks that killed 162 people. Chinese sources corroborate violent unrest in Xinjiang in the early 1990s, including confirmed incidents such as 22 deaths in 1992 in Buran, though precise totals vary. Chapter 3, recognizing the problem: Xinjiang leadership recognized the overseas meddling. In March 1992, Tomo Mat (Weia name) chaired the Xinjiang Autonomous Region People’s Government and warned that hostile forces had stepped up infiltration, subversion, and sabotage. Chapter 4, the US propaganda push: The United States supported British efforts while also planning its own destabilization, backing Uighur nationalist Isa Youssef Alpdukin, who spoke in 1992 in Turkey about the collapse of the Chinese empire. Alpdukin, aligned with KMT nationalist aims, worked for Radio Liberty (Radio Free Asia) and advanced anti-China propaganda. Western intelligence and Uighur separatists formed a growing collaboration, with BBC involvement later. Chapter 5, the US trains fighters: The CIA and US military intelligence ran a Central Asia program, training Mujahideen and transferring hundreds of Xinjiang separatists to Central Asia for training. This alliance extended to Turkish agent Chatlie’s operations, including organizing protests and a coup in Azerbaijan. Chatlie died in a suspicious car crash in Turkey in 1996. From 1996 to 2002, Western agents continued to train Uighur separatists who conducted terrorist attacks, with Chinese authorities noting Western involvement. Chapter 6, a new country: The US initially portrayed Tibetans as victims of genocide, but UN data showed Tibetan population growth, shifting focus to Xinjiang. In February 2004, the US formally founded East Turkestan as a country, appointing Anwar Yusuf Tarani as prime minister in Washington, DC. Tarani’s government issued calls for economic aid and recognition but received none; Tarani resided in Fairfax, Virginia. Chapter 7, terrorism escalates: From 2007 to 2014, Xinjiang witnessed numerous terrorist attacks attributed to East Turkestan operatives, including a 2009 machete attack at a train station killing 197, a major car bomb in Urumqi, and the Kunming railway station attack. Western reporting rarely connected these events to MI6 or CIA collaboration, instead often blaming China’s policies or crackdowns. Chapter 8, a new narrative: The US and UK sought to suppress acknowledgment of intelligence involvement, aiming to recast terrorists as victims, and to depict Chinese authorities’ countermeasures as the cause of violence, aided by BBC and other outlets. The narrative aimed to deny Western complicity and demonize Xinjiang authorities. Chapter 9, blaming the victims: Western media, including NPR and BBC, reported on attacks by framing Chinese blame on Uighurs, often omitting Western involvement. Quotations from James Millward and others suggested crackdowns exacerbated violence, while sources like Radio Free Asia were presented without noting their propaganda relationships. Exiled Uighur groups cited Uighur oppression as a driver, while mainstream outlets echoed anti-Chinese framing. Chapter 10, the Uighur genocide hoax: By 2014, references stopped mentioning MI6 or CIA roots, with victims blamed as the cause of violence. The creator of this narrative shift prepared to discuss a broader “Uighur genocide hoax” in a future piece. The closing note cites sources and further reading, including Strategic Studies (1996), CIA operation Gladio literature, Sybil Edmunds, and Tony Cartolucci, dedicating the report to Xinjiang’s people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The documents show that MI six, the British spy service, plan to cut China into three separate countries. Eastern part will be allowed to retain the name China. The rest would be cut into a Northwest chunk and a Southwest chunk. The British plan was formulated as recently as the nineteen nineties, and part of it is still running today. Now this plot fitted in with a long term CIA propaganda campaign that falsely argued that Xinjiang and Tibet were not actually parts of China, although this was propaganda that Western countries did not believe themselves. All of them legally recognizing that both areas were within China's borders. Now this is an extraordinary story of mass murder and global brainwashing. And the story I'm gonna tell you is a true story. Where did I get it from? It's not from leaked documents or hacked files. It comes from good, honest research into historical documents by people in Hong Kong. This original research was shared at an acclaimed international academic conference on Xinjiang recently organized by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and the University of Hong Kong. Now we'll provide a reading list out at the end, and we'll tell the story in 10 short chapters. Chapter one, the MI six plot. In the early nineteen nineties, British spies working at MI six consulted academics about where to draw lines to chop China into three pieces. Now the man who got the job was Gerald Siegel of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in The UK. He was commissioned to start working on a on a map to tell them exactly where the country should be chopped up. It was a big job. Now at that time, Western journalists, academics, researchers were sometimes rather truthful about the West's manipulation of a small section of the Chinese Uighur population, with whom MI6 was quietly working. Now I say a small section. That's crucial to know. Journalists like to divide the Xinjiang population into the, you know, the oppressed Chinese Uighurs and the and Han Chinese authorities who allegedly do the oppressing. You know, this is not true. Never has authorities were then and still are made up of people of Uighur and Han backgrounds. Majority of the Chinese Uighur's populace were completely peaceful people working in agriculture in Western China. Now in contrast, the people the British wanted to to locate and control were the relatively few people who could be radicalized. This was a trick the Brits learned from the CIA and the NED. They've done it everywhere. Now all of this wasn't even a secret. Consider this passage from a nineteen nineties western academic publication called Strategic Studies. Xinjiang has long been a target of British intelligence with London hoping to manipulate the Uighur refugees from Xinjiang, and Uighur still there, into cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China. You can't get straight from that, can you? I mean, look at it. It says, you know, Xinjiang has long been a target of British intelligence. Yes. MI six. The Brits were the root of the problem. Not the Han Chinese. Not even the CIA. Report says that London was, quote, hoping to manipulate the Uighur refugees from Xinjiang, and Uighur's still there. So that refers to to Uighur separatists who had gone to the West to work with Western intelligence, and others who had stayed on in, you know, Chinese territory. What did their British masters want these guys to do? They wanted to turn them, quote, into cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China. Charming. Right? But at least the write up is honest. I wish I wish today's media could be, you know, one tenth as truthful as that. Now, wanna be clear about that. The document I just quoted is not some, you know, Chinese government propaganda document, you know, making unsourced allegations against the West. It's a piece of academic writing from the West published in an academic journal called Strategic Studies. Simple, plain truth, or just the facts matter. So the West, and London in particular, was hungry to create trouble in China using Uighur separatists. And what do they do? Well, they succeeded to a to an astonishing extent. In the early nineteen nineties, the Uighur people were horrified when someone started organizing unrest. I mean, serious unrest, violent unrest, murderous unrest. Chapter two, a secret agent. Now you might expect that MI six, famed as the home of the fictional James Bond, would have a dashing male secret agent sneaking into the country to create huge problems for the Chinese. In fact, that is exactly what happened. A secret agent who was a one man army did come to the area to create havoc, but he wasn't British. He had multiple passports, including one under the name of Michael Nicholson. That sounds rather western, doesn't it? Michael Nicholson had a strong understanding of Central Asian cultures and languages. That's because his real name was Abdullah Chattley, and he was Turkish. One book of CIA history focusing on an infamous CIA operation called Gladio reports that at the time, Chatley helped the Uighurs mount insurrectionary attacks that killed a 162 people. That's pretty dramatic. Now that's a detail from an American source. Can we confirm this from the Chinese side? Well, that's a bit tricky. In the early nineteen nineties, the Chinese media were very opaque, and there's no searchable database available. But we can find general references to suggest that, yes, separatists were causing numbers of terrorist incidents in Xinjiang at exactly that time. And, yes, people were killed in these incidents. In one specific incident, Uighur separatists killed 22 people in 1992 in a town called Buran. So while we can't confirm the the number, a hundred and sixty two dead, it's clear that a significant number of people died in western supported attacks in Xinjiang at that time. Now as I mentioned earlier, the West has long falsely presented an image of Xinjiang as a place where one ethnic group are prisoners and the other are oppressive overlords. This has never been true. As I said, in Xinjiang, people with Uighur or other ethnic minority background can commonly be found as police officers, as army soldiers, as local officials, and sometimes right at the top of those ladders, you know, governing society. Chapter three, recognizing the problem. Now the Chinese authorities in Xinjiang, you know, which means senior people of Uighur and Han background, These people knew full well that m I six was creating trouble on their turf. In March 1992, the chairman of the Xinjiang Autonomous Region People's Government was a man called Tomo Mat. Not a Han Chinese name. Yes. It's a Weia Chinese name. Now he issued a warning to his people, the people of Xinjiang. He said hostile forces, both at home and abroad, have stepped up their infiltration, subversion, and sabotage. So clearly, the Uighur leaders in China knew that trouble was coming. They knew it was from overseas. But things were moving on. Before the 1994, the British academic Gerald Segal had finished his detailed map to show precisely how the West could chop China into three separate countries. Chapter four, The US propaganda push. Now the Americans liked what the British were doing in Western China, but they were also making their own escalation plans with regards to creating trouble in Xinjiang. The CIA was backing a Chinese Uighur man named Isa Youssef Alpdukin. He was a Chinese nationalist, a supporter of the KMT. Furious that his team, the Chinese nationalists, had been defeated, Alpdukin consistently backed anyone who opposed the ruling Chinese government. He made his attitude very clear in a 1992 speech delivered in Turkey. The time for collapse and dissolution has arrived for the Chinese empire. In other words, if the Chinese nationalists could not have China, then nobody should have it. That was his attitude. The man's son was called Erkin Alptikin. The Americans had given him a job in a in a US anti China propaganda operation. In the nineteen nineties, he worked for Radio Liberty, a US media propaganda unit, which was part of the Radio Free Asia cluster formed to advance American interests, which in practice meant demonizing China, pretending to be a real news service. So we can see a growing relationship between The US intelligence agencies and Chinese Uyghur separatists, both from The UK and the and the British and the American side. They were working together on anti China operations, and this would develop into a massive China demonization campaign with the BBC playing a leading part. Chapter five, The US trains fighters. Then came another twist in the tale, one one that turned out to be very consequential. The CIA and US military intelligence for years have been running a separate big operation next door in and around Afghanistan. As part of their Central Asia program, The US had been devoting a very large sum of money, I mean, of millions of dollars, to get the rebels known as the Mujahideen to form groups of guerrilla fighters. These groups would then embark on acts of sabotage or terrorism in areas controlled by Russia or any other socialist groups. After discussions with the British, the Americans added hundreds of Xinjiang separatists to be quietly shipped from China to Central Asia for training activities. Now as you know, this project eventually backfired badly for the Americans. The Central Asian guerrilla groups, they were financing, training, equipping, gave birth to Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban. But that was all in the future. Let's let's stick to our timeline. We're in the mid nineteen nineties. So the West was working with a Turkish secret agent called Cately, who would visit Central Asia and China under various fake identities and organize acts of terrorism and even try to initiate regime change operations. He organized protests in many countries and even a coup in Azerbaijan, one book says. As you can imagine, Chapley made lots of enemies throughout Central Asia and he came to a nasty end. He was killed in a rather suspicious car crash in Turkey in 1996. Chapter five, time for more uprisings. From 1996 to 02/2002, these other western agents continued to train Uighur separatists in China, who went on to make multiple terrorist attacks with many innocent people losing their lives in horrible ways. Now the Chinese knew the West was involved in this nastiness. How come? Well, they could read for a start the text I quoted earlier about London manipulating the Uighurs in becoming cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China. That text, I mean, that was printed in 1996 on page 41 of strategic studies. So, you know, one of the things that historians love about the CIA is that ex agents love to write books and essays and websites. FBI agent Sybil Edmunds knowledgeable about these operations and later went public to write the following. Between 1996 and 02/2002, we, The United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every single uprising and terror related scheme in Xinjiang. I mean, this of course has never been admitted officially by the US government, but The US says that the serious terrorism should be blamed on a dangerous group called the Grey Wolves. But these people clearly overlapped with the Western powers. The aforementioned Alptukin, for example, had been with the Grey Wolves. Chapter six, a new country. Now until this time, The US had been pretending that Chinese Tibetans have been genocided by the Han Chinese. But UN data showed that the Tibetan population was actually growing much faster than other Chinese groups, the opposite of a genocide. There's also growing public knowledge even in the West that the Tibet exiles in India, that was a project set up and financed by the CIA. It kind of stopped being a secret. So the Tibet part of the plan was revised to being a cultural genocide, and the main focus moved to Xinjiang. In 02/2004, The US formally founded East Turkestan as a country. For convenience, they decided to have a prime minister of the new country in Washington DC rather than have someone among the actual Chinese Uighur people. They selected The US selected a man named Anwar Yusuf Tarani. This new country was officially formed in Washington DC on 09/14/2004. The first thing they did was to call for economic assistance and international recognition. Of course, they did not get international recognition by anyone, not even The United States. Everyone in diplomatic circles knew it was a scam. But it all helped to demonize the Chinese. Following the speech, Tarani returned to his home, not in Xinjiang, but in Fairfax, Virginia. That's what we read in a book about the history of CIA's Operation Gladio. Chapter seven, terrorism escalates. Now, meanwhile in China, the dark side of the operations at The US and The US have stirred up. I mean, was continuing to grow. Between 2007 and 2014, there were large numbers of terrorist attacks in China by members of the East Turkestan project. Hundreds of innocent people lost their lives in horrible ways. In one particularly shocking 2009 operation, the violent separatists used Facebook to coordinate a massive attack in which a 197 people were hacked to death with machetes. In another huge car bomb in Urumqi, killed forty three people and wounded ninety four. At Kunming's train station, a shocking attack by eight knife wielding terrorists killed twenty nine people and wounded a hundred and forty, and so on. But who was to blame? Well, there were many mainstream media reports about these events, even in the West. But not one of them, not one mentioned the fact that the MI six and CIA have been working for many years to radicalize a minority of people in Xinjiang to create problems. Not one. Many implied that China had taken over their land, so it was somehow to blame. There was worse to come. Chapter eight, a new narrative. Now The US and The UK, these rich, highly developed nations, had succeeded in creating enormous problems for a developing country. And they were ready to move on to stage two, which was blame the victims. It was time for the Americans to use their superpower, narrative control, brainwashing the world. Now they needed to do three things. Number one, get journalists and academics to completely cover the fact that the CIA and the MI six had been organizing terrorist acts in China. That needed to be entirely cut out of the story, every report, in every media outlet. Number two, trick the public into seeing the terrorists who'd kill so many innocent people as the good guys. They needed to be recast as victims. Number three, mislead everyone into believing that people trying to stop the murder of innocents, they were the bad guys. The authorities in Xinjiang, the people of the Uighur Anhan background, are trying to stop the violence. They needed to be demonized. Now creating this narrative completely upside down to reality, it may sound like a tall order, but incredibly, they did it. Chapter nine. Blaming the victims. So the next stage of the hoax was the most audacious of all. They would twist the narrative to blame the victims. How did they do this? Now let me show you. I'm gonna show you a typical Western press report. There are literally hundreds of such reports. Now this one comes from NPR on the and it was published on the 05/30/2014. But there are hundreds of these. You can look it up yourself very easily. In early March, a group armed with long knives slashed their way through a train station Plaza in China's Southwest. They killed nearly 30 people and wounded more than four times that. Chinese authorities blamed Uighurs. You get that? Blamed Uighurs. As if this was just a just a claim. In fact, the Uighurs claimed the instance. There was no doubt about who had done it. But by writing that the Chinese authorities blamed Uighurs, you know, it becomes no more than a claim. Report then quotes a rather notoriously anti Chinese scholar, James Millward, saying that Chinese attempts to stop the violence were actually to blame. I think these crackdowns may have created a climate, may have created enough frustration, where there are some people who are beginning to pay heed to the horrible pseudo religious ideologies that lead to suicide bombings and attacks on civilians. So get that, the crackdowns were to blame. Trying to stop the violence was to blame for the violence. The report continues, Millwood cited a recent case reported by Radio Free Asia. It doesn't mention that Radio Free Asia is a propaganda unit notorious for exaggerating or even inventing stories that put the Chinese in a bad light. The article includes another quote by Millwood. By going after headscarves, the authorities have really produced a conflict here which was completely unnecessary. You can see how the narrative has changed. All mentions of US and UK involvement have gone. There's no hint of that ever having taken place. The people trying to stop the violence are now the cause of the violence. The Chinese crackdowns created a climate for the problems. The authorities have, quote, produced a conflict here, which was completely unnecessary. Western media and Western academics have flipped the narrative to blame the victims. Here's the BBC doing the same trick. Authorities traditionally blame extremists for these outbreaks of violence, while Uighur activists point to tight Chinese control as a cause of tensions. So you can see, you know, what the authorities do is presented skeptically. Authorities traditionally blame extremists, but what the extremists do is presented not as a claim but as evidence. The BBC writes, activists point to tight Chinese control. And also, you know, they make the same point. Trying to stop mass murder is presented as a cause of tensions. And here's another one. China sentences eight to death for knife bomb attacks in the West, says Voice of America. That was on 12/04/2014. It seems a straightforward enough story. Right? But the media outlet, which is a US government station, goes on to say, in such a heavily politicized environment, a fair trial was impossible, said Dilshap Rakshit, spokesman for exile group, the World Uighur Congress. China has not looked at all for the root causes of the incident from the point of view of their own extreme policies, he said in an emailed statement. And Then we have it again, that first the reporter covers up, hides from the public the fact that the quote is from the World Uighur Congress, a group financed by the NED, which is the CIA's soft power spin off. This is a group in the West, paid for by the West. And second, the quote says the authorities are directly to blame for the problems. The point is hammered home again later in the same article. Exile Uighur groups and human rights activists say the government's repressive policies in Xinjiang, including controls on Islam, have provoked unrest. Similar articles doing the same tricks were printed multiple times, week after week, month after month, year after year to a global audience. It worked brilliantly. Chapter 10, the Uighur genocide hoax. By 2014, printed references never mentioned d m I six or c I a roots to the violence. And the victims, the the Chinese, the people of China, the authorities, they were blamed as the cause of the problem. Having flipped the narrative upside down, the West was ready for the next part of the story, the creation of the Uighur genocide hoax. Now that's a story I'm gonna do another time. Peace. Stay tuned for sources and further reading. Academia has several documents on London's attempts to create trouble in China in the nineteen nineties. Best, I think, is the one I quoted, page 41 of the nineteen ninety six volume of the Journal of Strategic Studies. Material about how the Western powers and Turkish separatists work together can be found in various books and reports. Sometimes the books focus mainly on CIA project, Gladio, which was focused originally on creating trouble in Europe, then spun off into causing problems for Russia and China. FBI whisperer, Sybil Edmunds, is still around and even doing livestreams on YouTube. Tony Cartolucci, one of the pen names of Brian Beletic, has done some excellent work on this topic. His content really rewards study. And finally, this report is dedicated to the wonderful people of Xinjiang. Long may they prosper.

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - September 15, 2025 at 5:39 AM

Saved - September 15, 2025 at 7:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Chinese tech scientists have surpassed their US counterparts in global downloads of open-source AI programs, as noted by Ali Farhadi. A graph by Nathan Lambert illustrates that this shift occurred in June-July, with Chinese downloads overtaking those from the US and leaving Europe behind. Start-ups in the US are increasingly using Chinese AI models, which are free and outperform American alternatives in benchmarks. While American AI may attract more investment, Chinese firms prioritize market share over profits. The US is adopting aggressive tactics to maintain its tech dominance.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

Chinese tech scientists have jumped ahead of US counterparts in global downloads of open-source AI programs. “As hard as it is for us all to swallow, I think we’re behind now,” said Ali Farhadi of Seattle’s Allen Institute for ai, quoted in the Economist. 1/7 https://t.co/4ey6pkACbo

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

And it’s not just an opinion. AI guru Nathan Lambert created a graph showing the period in June-July this year that downloading of Chinese open-source programs overtook US ones – and it also showed the Europeans left in the dust. 2/7

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

China’s big lead is with start-ups in the US, the Economist says: “When entrepreneurs walk into the offices of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), a big American venture-capital firm, the odds these days are that their startups are using ai models made in China.” Staff say it's 80%. 3/7

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

Why the preference for Chinese models? They’re free and they’re good. Several Chinese programs, like Qwen, beat their open source American rivals on benchmark tests—and are breathing down the necks of the closed source “big boys”. 4/7

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

American AI will make more money from investors, while the Chinese are foregoing profits to serve a bigger stable of smaller users. It may sound like socialism, but gambling on the ultimate benefit of gaining market share is also classic capitalism. 5/7

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

Trump won’t like this. Will someone play dirty to get ahead? One side has gained the reputation for playing hardball in the technology race, and it’s not the Chinese, despite all efforts to paint them as cartoon villains. 6/7

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

Even the Atlantic Council admits that the US is being super-aggressive, “bolstering enforcement of existing chip export controls, pressuring allies to align with US restrictions under threat of penalty, and generally seeking to create dependencies on US technology products”. 7/7

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - September 12, 2025 at 9:20 AM

Saved - September 12, 2025 at 11:05 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Documents reveal that the US invested over a million dollars in Nepal to promote regime change after the government sought internet independence inspired by China's model. The National Endowment for Democracy trained journalists to expose government corruption and youth in political activism. As Nepal attempted to regulate social media, protests erupted, leading to chaos and significant costs for the nation. Ultimately, the desire for an independent internet was overshadowed by US influence, leaving Nepal reliant on the Western narrative while stifling local innovation.

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

Exclusive: Documents reveal how the US achieved regime change in Nepal, whose leaders had become “too friendly” with China TLDR SUMMARY: The US spent more than a million dollars in Nepal recently, specifically a) training journalists to accuse the govt of corruption; and b) training Gen-Z youth in political activism. The aim: regime change, after Nepal’s leaders said they wanted to follow China’s independent internet model, having seen the global success of Tiktok and other Chinese apps. Regime change was achieved. . A CRACK IN THE ARMOUR IN 2023, STRATEGISTS IN WASHINGTON DC spotted a worrying problem in Asia. A small nation, Nepal, wanted internet independence, like China had. The US used to sneer at what they called “China’s great firewall”, portraying it as a negative factor. But it was obvious by 2023 that such a view was a huge mistake. By having its own internet, China had developed a large, thriving web ecosystem for commerce and information. And the apps the Chinese system produced were so good that they took over the world. TikTok beat its US rivals, Aliexpress sold twice as many goods as Amazon, Shein quickly became the world’s top fashion seller, and Temu was the hottest thing on the net. The Chinese firewall, rather than being a bad thing, was a massive advantage. The Europeans, in shock, realized the truth of this, too, but they were too late to do anything about it. Nepal was not too late. It wanted to follow the Chinese model—and were soon joined by Cambodia and Pakistan, who wanted to do the same. The US was horrified, and started distributing articles saying this was a terrible idea, such as one published on December 1, 2023: “Nepal Has a Lot to Gain from the Open, Global Internet. So Why Is the Country Closing the Doors on It?” . ENTER THE N.E.D When Nepal refused to stop learning from China, the National Endowment for Democracy stepped up operations. In Nepal last year, NED operatives circulated reports, organized roundtable discussions and held briefings, all with one message: China is the enemy, the US is your friend. At the same time, US operatives organized sessions to train Nepalese reporters “to expose corruption and abuse of authority”. In a third operation, NED staff trained Gen-Z youth in political activism. All in all the NED, by itself, spent about 1.6 million US dollars stirring up activism in Nepal last year—a lot of money in that country. So far, so predictable. But what made this particular US operation special was the focus on technology and communications. . ALL CHINA’S FAULT To ramp up the operation, the NED in February this year circulated a long and unintentionally hilarious report called “Data-Centric Authoritarianism” which purported to show “How China’s Development of Frontier Technologies Could Globalize Repression”. In an astonishing feat of logical contortion, this 41-page report argued that it was a terrible idea for a country to have a sovereign internet system, free and independent of US domination. It would mean “a win for China”. “Pakistan, Nepal, and Cambodia, pursuing internet gateways that will funnel all international internet traffic through a government-controlled chokepoint, is a win for China,” the NED report said. “These moves enhance China’s prestige, positioning the once-unique ‘Great Firewall’ as a potential model for other countries worldwide.” The US was worried. If nations controlled their own information spaces, this would crash Washington’s all-encompassing grip over the global narrative. . BABY STEPS Nepal pressed ahead with the tiniest of baby steps. Earlier this year, it simply asked all social media websites to register with the Nepali government. The websites had to name a local contact, an authorized person to handle grievances, and a person responsible for self-regulation, by September 3. But here’s where things went odd. TikTok, which has a Chinese parent, was happy to sign up, as did an app called We-Talk, and one called Viber, from an Israeli company. But the US apps, such as Facebook, Whatsapp and Linked in, refused to obey. The Nepalese government had no choice but to follow through on what it had said by halting them. That was when it became clear that a segment of Nepalese young people turned out to be Gen-Z youth which persons unknown had trained in political activism--and they hit the streets. . TRAGIC RESULTS In the ensuing chaos, lives were lost, property was destroyed, and the cost to Nepal, a poor country, has been enormous, reputationally and financially. It’s been tragic. But think about this. The call for protests came from the media sector—the sector trained by the NED to focus on anti-government articles. Is that a coincidence? The theme of the protests was “to expose corruption and abuse of authority”, exactly the theme NED suggested. But that may also be just a coincidence. The main participants were Gen-Z youth, the group NED had been training for political activism. That could be a coincidence too, in theory. And allegations are circulating saying that trouble is China’s fault, just as the series of 2024 briefings had suggested. . WESTERN NARRATIVE WINS AGAIN This story has a sad ending. The Nepalese wanted an internet system of their own, so they could develop their own apps, keep foreign interference, out and have a measure of web independence. This would have been good for the people, especially creative young Gen-Z people in Nepal, who could create their own apps for their own market. Instead, they are stuck as a tiny subsidiary of the US system, locked into the western narrative. For example, going around people’s phones right now is a New York Times report titled “The Forces Behind Nepal’s Explosive Gen Z Protests”. It talks about govt corruption and Gen-Z activism, as if the NED itself had dictated the article. And it chooses not to mention any of the elements I’ve just told you about. Not one.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2023, strategists in Washington DC spotted a worrying problem in Asia: A small nation, Nepal, wanted Internet independence like China had. China having its own Internet meant that the country could develop its own entire web ecosystem for commerce and information and everything else, and they did it really well. By 2023, the Nepalese realized they would be smart to follow China's model. The US was horrified. “What if other countries started to want the same thing?” and NED began circulating reports, organizing round table discussions, and briefings all with one message: “China is the enemy. US is your friend.” The NED theme was countering corruption and authoritarian influence. It circulated a long report, “Data Centric Authoritarianism,” which purported to show how China’s frontier technologies could globalize repression. Nepal asked social media to register; TikTok, WeTalk, and Viber complied; Facebook, WhatsApp, LinkedIn refused and were halted. Protests by Gen z followed, framed as exposing corruption and abuse of authority—the theme the NED had suggested. The root: Nepalese wanted an Internet system of their own to develop apps and keep out foreign interference, but they ended up in a US-dominated model. The New York Times piece, “the forces behind Nepal's explosive Gen z protests,” omits these elements. Remember to think for yourself. Peace.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Exclusive, the real story of how an Internet issue in Nepal turned into violent regime change is shocking. But it's a story you need to know to understand what's really happening in the world. In 2023, strategists in Washington DC spotted a worrying problem in Asia. A small nation, Nepal, wanted Internet independence like China had. Now you may know that The US used to sneer at what they called China's great firewall, seeing it as a press freedom issue. But no, that was a mistake. They realized it made a huge error. China having its own Internet meant that the country could develop its own entire web ecosystem for commerce and information and everything else, and they did it really well. In fact, they did it so well that China's unique independent Internet sector has been hugely successful around the world, including in The US. So TikTok beat its US rivals so badly that they all copied TikTok's style. AliExpress was selling twice as many goods as Amazon. And Sheen quickly became the world's top fashion seller. Tmall was the hottest thing on the net, and so on. A sovereign Internet was a huge advantage, it became obvious. By 2023, the Nepalese realized they would be smart to follow China's model rather than making the error made by the Europeans who let US global tech firms eat their lunches and their economies. The US was horrified. What if other countries started to want the same thing? So articles started to appear saying that, oh, the Nepalese, they've got a really bad idea. So for example, one appeared on 12/01/2023 saying, Nepal has a lot to gain from the open global Internet, so why is the country closing doors on it? From there, Washington DC's soft power version of the CIA, which is the National Endowment for Democracy, went into action. And so in Nepal last year, US agents circulated reports, organized round table discussions, and held briefings all with one message. China is the enemy. US is your friend. Now the official theme for this series of events about China was countering corruption and authoritarian influence. At the same time, US operatives organized sessions to train Nepalese reporters, local media, quote, to expose corruption and abuse of authority, publish articles to promote accountability and transparency, and hold political leaders accountable. In other words, hit hard at the government. A third group for operatives spent their time on pulling in young people or Gen z youth. Their aim was to empower activists in promoting democratic values and human rights. US operatives provided training on using art for social and political expression. So all in all, the NED by itself spent about US dollars stirring up activism in Nepal last year. That's a lot of money in that country. It splashed out to make sure a spotlight was shone on government corruption, on training Gen z to be politically active, and to encourage people to see the Chinese as the bad guys. I mean, so far so predictable. But what made this particular US operation special was the focus on technology and communications. So the NED in February circulated a long and, I would say, unintentionally hilarious report called Data Centric Authoritarianism, which purported to show how China's development of frontier technologies could globalize repression. In an astonishing feat of logical contortion, this 41 page report argued that if a country wanted to have an Internet system that was free and independent of US domination, that country would become a terrible authoritarian place. You see, by this time, Pakistan and Cambodia had joined Nepal in realizing that an independent Internet with control within a community's sovereign borders could be a really good idea, especially since The US had a bad reputation for transnational interference. The NED report said Pakistan, Nepal, and Cambodia pursuing Internet gateways that will funnel all international Internet traffic through a government controlled choke point is a win for China. How can it be a win for China? Not who's not involved at all? The US report said, these moves enhance China's prestige, positioning the once unique Great Firewall as a potential model for other countries worldwide. You know, it's clear that Chinese style firewalls would be actually good for countries. But if other nations control their own information spaces, commerce space, This would crash Washington's all encompassing grip over the global narrative, over the global everything. Now Nepal pressed ahead with the tiniest of baby steps. So earlier this year, it simply asked all social media websites to register with the government. The websites had to name a local contact, an authorized person to handle grievances, and a person responsible for self regulation. Small thing. Now these details had to be given to Nepal's Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. Deadline, September 3. Now here's where things went odd. TikTok, which has a Chinese parent, was happy to sign up and so did an app called WeTalk, and one called Viber, which I think is from an Israeli company. But The US apps, Facebook, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and someone refused to obey. Were they told to do that by Washington? I don't know. The Nepalese government had no choice but to follow through on what it had said by halting them. That's when the Gen C activists went into action. In the ensuing chaos, lives are lost, property was destroyed, and the cost to Nepal, a poor country, has been enormous reputationally and financially. It's been tragic. But think about this. The call for protests came from the media sector, the sector trained to publish anti government articles by the NED. Is that a coincidence? The theme of the protest was to expose corruption and abuse of authority, which is exactly the theme the NED had suggested. But, of course, that may also just be a coincidence. And the main participants were Gen z youth, the exact group the NED had been training for political activism. That may also be by coincidence. And allegations are circulated saying the trouble is all China's fault, just as a series of twenty twenty four briefings from the NED had suggested. But let's not forget the root of the problem. Nepalese wanted an Internet system of their own so they could develop their own apps. They could keep out foreign interference and have a measure of Internet independence for their own people. This would have been good for the people, especially the creative young Gen z people in Nepal, who could create their own apps for for for music, for commerce, for whatever. But now instead, they're stuck in The US dominated model, which of course will tell them the Western narrative. You know, West is best, the rest is bad. I can give you an example. Going around people's phones right now in Nepal. There's a New York Times report titled, the forces behind Nepal's explosive Gen z protests. And you know what? It chooses not to mention any of the elements I've just told you about. Not one. Remember, always think for yourself and read widely. Peace.

@NuryVittachi — Nury Vittachi

Posted - November 24, 2023 at 12:48 AM

Saved - November 24, 2023 at 11:56 AM

@NuryVittachi - Nury Vittachi

OOOPS! Fox News is running a clip about brave Israeli soldiers capturing a Palestinian in gray underpants, but the report accidentally includes a shot of the actor playing the Palestinian getting dressed afterwards! https://t.co/aQ6gNIUpQi

Video Transcript AI Summary

Fox News shows a clip of Israeli soldiers capturing a Palestinian man who tried to infiltrate Israel-controlled territory. The soldiers order him to lay down and arrest him, blindfolding and handcuffing him. They lead him away, indicating that he is another militant who entered from the Gaza Strip. The situation is tense and unpredictable, as the soldiers don't know where people may be hiding. The clip also includes a shot of the man taking off his blindfold and putting his clothes back on.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is funny. Fox News is running a very dramatic clip about their reporter being on the spot as brave Israeli soldiers capture a terrorist who tried to infiltrate Israel controlled territory. Speaker 1: You can see the soldiers, get down. Get down. Lay down flat. Lay down. Lay down totally flat. You can see things are very tense here. There were 2 gunshots, and now they have someone on the ground. Speaker 2: Go back right now. Speaker 1: Very tense right now as these soldiers appear to be arresting a Palestinian man. They have him in handcuffs right now, and you can see they've blindfolded him, And they are Speaker 0: Here you can see the man held tight by soldiers, blindfolded, barefoot, wearing gray underpants. Then the scene disappears behind a black background. Speaker 1: Taking him away. You can see here, they're leading him away. They've blindfolded this man, And it appears they have captured yet another militant who entered from the Gaza Strip. It gives you a sense of just how unpredictable all of this is. They don't know where people are hiding, and they could still be In the tree lines here Speaker 0: near the top of the screen. Report seems to accidentally include a shot of gray underpants man who's taken off his blindfold and is Putting his clothes back on. Not looking good, Fox News. Not looking good. Now here's the whole passage without any editing, so you can move the tent for yourself. Speaker 1: Lay down. Lay down totally flat. You can see things are very tense here. Speaker 2: Right now, all the plates. Speaker 1: There were 2 gunshots, and now they have someone on the ground. Speaker 2: Go back right now. Speaker 1: Very tense right now as these soldiers appear to be arresting A Palestinian man, they have him in handcuffs right now. And you can see they've blindfolded him, and they are Taking him away. You can see here, they're leading him away. They've blindfolded this man, and it appears They have captured yet another militant who entered from the Gaza Strip. It gives you a sense of just how unpredictable all of this is. They don't know where people are hiding, and they could still be in the tree lines here near to the Gaza border.