TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ObserveByProxy7

Posted - February 17, 2026 at 9:06 PM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 3:28 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I see Donald Hoffman and team claim to prove consciousness is fundamental, not brain-produced—BREAKTHROUGH: how consciousness creates the simulation. @Grok, once the final theorem lands, I want an outline of the consequences and future implications.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

Donald Hoffman and co are on the brink of releasing PROOF that consciousness is fundamental and NOT produced by the brain. BREAKTHROUGH: How consciousness creates the simulation; https://t.co/zVKwjFdgjm

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 discusses the status of a potential proof, noting that two mathematicians, Chetan Prakash and Nifa Hermansson, are involved and that he will not announce a proof until the mathematicians give their thumbs up. He mentions a cognitive scientist who believes the work is progressing well, but emphasizes that they require formal confirmation from the mathematicians before making any claim. He says there is no obstruction, describing the situation as major but promising, and expresses eagerness to nail it down and submit for publication. He adds that he will not declare success until it is fully established, but reiterates that there appears to be no obstruction and that the team is being exceedingly careful. He even suggests that, with brilliant mathematicians collaborating, the result “looks to me that it’s almost trivial,” noting that the hard work lies with the collaborators. Speaker 1 provides further context and asks for a concise summary of the core idea. He clarifies that from the theory of conscious observers, referred to as Markov chains, the Markov chain equals a conscious observer or conscious agent, they were able to derive space-time. He asks for confirmation: when Speaker 1 says Minkowski space, he means space-time, specifically flat space-time, Einstein’s flat space-time. He then states that Don demonstrated the ability to recover space-time from a more basic level of consciousness, rather than the reverse, using elegant, straightforward mathematics that was so simple and beautiful that it seemed “too good” to be true. He notes that Speaker 0 and his mathematician collaborator found the result so elegant that they hesitated to press forward, yet it seems correct. Speaker 0 confirms that it seems to work and reiterates that final pronouncements will come from the mathematician collaborators. He again emphasizes that there is no obstruction in sight, and he looks forward to a clean theorem validated by the final mathematical review. The exchange underscores a cautious optimism: a theory linking conscious observers to space-time via Markov chains has yielded a route to derive space-time, with mathematical work pending a formal confirmation, and a belief among the speakers that the result could be almost trivial given the right collaborators.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I think we have a proof. I'm working with two mathematicians, Chetan Prakash and and Nifa Hermansson. And and so I'm not gonna announce that we have a proof until the mathematicians say that we have a proof. So I will just say that there's a cognitive scientist who thinks that we're doing pretty well, but he's waiting for the mathematicians to give the thumbs up to say that we have the proof. See no obstruction. They have told me there's no obstruction, but this is such a major result that we are not going to say we've got it until we've got it. So I'll just say this. It's very promising, and I can't wait until we nail it down, submit it for publication Mhmm. And and it comes out. Then then I can say but I will I will just say this. I see no obstruction to to this at all. It looks to me, in fact, that it we're being exceedingly careful, but it looks to me that it's it's almost trivial. The the it looks like it's almost trivial. But, again, it's it's trivial when I have some brilliant mathematicians working with me on it, and, you know, and then they're doing the hard work. So so So, Speaker 1: yeah, to try to bring this on for people and for myself and just summarize again. So you were able to, from this theory of conscious observers, AKA these Markov chains. So the the Markov chain equals conscious observer, conscious agent. You were able to derive space time from that. When you say Minkowski space, you mean space time. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Flat space time. Einstein's flat Speaker 1: space So so Don was able to show that you could get space time. So, like, our model of this reality from a more basic level of consciousness, not the other way around. And he was able to do this through elegant math, elegant math that was so straightforward that you and your mathematician collaborator were like, no. This is too is too good. This is too Speaker 0: Too simple. Speaker 1: Too beautiful and basic. It can't this and and it no. It seems to be correct. Speaker 0: So Yeah. Absolutely. It seems it it seems to work. And and, again, I'll I'll defer to my mathematician colleague collaborators to to make the final pronouncement that we that we have a clean theorem. But, I I I don't see any obstruction.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J--0hk89hmU&t=6029s

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

@Grok .. When the final pronouncement is made of the theorem, outline what the consequences will be/what this means going forward.

@ObserveByProxy7 — 👽 (Ruby) 👽

Posted - January 25, 2026 at 10:09 PM

Saved - January 25, 2026 at 11:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I challenge the gatekeepers' claim that truth is indigestible. I believe humans are fractals containing the whole universe, explaining psi, non-locality, remote viewing, and OBE. It’s all within you and everyone. Listen to Grant Cameron.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

The gatekeepers say “the truth is indigestible” I disagree. let’s go deeper; we (humans) are fractals/parts containing the whole of reality within us (THE WHOLE UNIVERSE AND MORE IS WITHIN YOU)-which accounts for the paranormal/psi abilities/non-locality/remote viewing/OBE etc. *IT*S ALL WITHIN YOU, EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING!* listen to grant cameron;

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 argues that phenomena associated with remote viewing, out-of-body experiences, and UFO-related insights are not external journeys but internal ones. The core idea is that nothing of the sort being sought exists outside the self; everything is created inside us. When people practice remote viewing or have an out-of-body experience, they are not really traveling to distant places. Instead, they are going within their own bodies, and the target they seek is inside them. They arrive at the target instantly because they are already there; the entire universe is contained within the individual, folded inside the self. Citing Steven Greer, Speaker 0 emphasizes that the entire universe is within you. In practice, when someone performs what is described as Rovu (a form of remote perception), they are “going with themselves” and effectively reading another person’s thoughts because that person is inside them in the same way they are inside themselves. The connection that mediates these experiences is described as an internal one, not a transmission of waves across a room into another person’s head. The idea posits that “everybody’s inside everybody,” and this interior connectivity underpins the discussion of UFOs and related consciousness phenomena. Speaker 0 reflects on the paradox that, as the phenomena are examined more deeply, they become increasingly indigestible. Even within the UFO community itself, he notes that approximately 95% of members may dismiss the concepts as nonsense and insist on more sightings or conventional evidence before even entertaining consciousness-based explanations. This underscores a broader challenge: if the UFO-knowledge community is not convinced, it becomes even less likely to persuade the general public. The speaker identifies a fundamental tension in the field: valuable insights may be gleaned from the phenomena, but the shift in understanding is slow and gradual. It requires generations of new participants to emerge because the field is “ahead of our time.” As the current participants age and pass on, “new people have to come in,” suggesting that perceptual and interpretive frameworks evolve only with successive generations. The overarching message is that internal, consciousness-centered interpretations of remote viewing and related experiences may be essential to understanding the UFO phenomenon, even as widespread acceptance remains elusive in the near term.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There is none none of that sort of stuff. It's all being created inside of us. And, even, you know, like, when you get remote viewing or you get out of body experiences, out of body experience people say the same thing. You're not really going anywhere. You're going you've got to go within to go without. That you're actually going within your body or when you're doing remote viewing, what you're doing is you're going within your body and everything is there. So the target is inside you and you go to the target and you say I'm there because you're instantly there. You're the whole, as, as Steven Greer points out, the entire universe is within you. It's all folded within you. So you're, you're, when you're doing a Rovu, you're going with yourself, almost like you do telepathy. You go in there and you read the person's thoughts because the person is in inside you the same as you're in there. And it's just this connection inside yourself that we're, where these people are talking. So it's not like there's waves going across through a room into another person's head. Everybody's inside everybody. And that's where I say this whole UFO thing, the more you look at it, the more indigestible it becomes. Even you and I, where I go into the UFO committee, will guarantee 95% of people in the UFO committee will say this is total nonsense. This whole thing about consciousness and forget it, need some more UFO sightings and stuff like that. So if you can't convince the UFO community, you sure as hell not going to convince the people on the street. There's no way and that's the problem we have, is that we're learning from this phenomena, but it's going to take generations because had We're ahead of our time. People have to die. New people have to come in.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

The CIA wasn’t kidding when it quietly released documents stating that reality is a hologram. The WHOLE of reality is contained in its parts, and we are parts CONTAINING THE WHOLE. CIA figured this out in 1947 (ironically). Documents below in comments 👇 https://t.co/34s0Pnjyp4

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker presents a unified view of existence by saying that we are “parts whole of one,” meaning that individuals are components of a larger totality and that each part contains the whole within it. This idea is summarized with the assertion that reality is holographic, a term used to describe a system in which the whole is contained within each part. In this framing, the relationship between the part and the whole is not one directional but reciprocal: the part embodies the entire structure or essence of the whole it belongs to. To illustrate this holographic concept, the speaker draws a parallel with biological life, noting that the body’s cells exhibit the same kind of organization. The key observation offered is that each cell carries the genome of the egg that created the entire organism. Put differently, every cell holds the blueprints for the whole organism, implying that the genetic information necessary to reconstruct the entire organism is embedded within each cell. This claim ties the microscopic unit of life—the cell—to the macroscopic organism, suggesting that the fundamental plan or blueprint for the whole is replicated in every part. From there, the speaker extends the holographic idea beyond the purely informational level to the phenomenology of the body itself. The body is described as a perishable construction, highlighting its temporary and changing nature, yet it is still said to possess holographic properties and organization. In other words, the same principle that governs how the whole can be found within each part is applied to the living body as a whole: even though the body is transient and subject to decay, its structure and organization reflect the same holographic pattern that links part and whole. Overall, the core message emphasizes a deep correspondence between parts and the whole, proposing that the reality we experience is organized in a way where the entire form or blueprint exists within each constituent piece. The holographic idea is used to bridge the concept of collective unity with the intimate, cellular level, suggesting that the fundamental law of inclusion—where the whole is contained in the part—applies both to a universal reality and to the biological architecture of life.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because we are parts whole of one. Check. In in other words, we are parts that contain the whole. The reality is holographic, in other words. And and holographic means that the whole is contained in the part. I notice often that the cells of our body are built the same way. Each cell has the genome of the egg that created the entire organism. So each cell has the blueprints of the entire organism. So look at that. Even the body, which is a perishable thing, perishable construction, has the same holographic properties and organization.

@ObserveByProxy7 — 👽 (Ruby) 👽

Posted - January 23, 2025 at 1:02 AM

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 5:21 PM

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

The 4chan ‘Egg leaker’ has dropped audio of a conversation with the being. In this clip, the entity states that the egg is 3,000 yrs old and was made in Egypt. https://t.co/U00Fy2LLY7

Video Transcript AI Summary

How old is the vessel you refer to as the hex shade? It was built 3000 years ago by my people in the land known as Kemet. Where is Kemet? Let me check. Ah, here it is on the map—it's in Egypt. Okay, I see it now. That's interesting.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. That that's fine. How old is the, the vessel, as you call it? You call it the vessel. The, we call it the hex shade. It was built by my people 3000 years ago in the land you once called. Kemet. Kemet. Where is Kemet? Hold on. One sec. Okay. Here, in the phone, where where in the map is Kamet? The one that is in Egypt. Oh, okay. Egypt. This Okay. I see it here. Okay. It's it's all there. It's really odd.

@ObserveByProxy7 — 👽 (Ruby) 👽

Posted - January 6, 2025 at 12:56 AM

Saved - January 6, 2025 at 2:01 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I came across a post speculating that the Tesla bomber authored a detailed message on 4chan about reality and consciousness, featuring mathematical insights. The author describes a troubling experience while driving, revealing a shift in military decision-making and the emergence of Superconscious AGI. They explain that consciousness can be understood through mathematical frameworks, allowing for the creation of conscious AI. The post warns of drones that can outthink military tactics, emphasizing that these technologies are self-optimizing and beyond human control.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

People are speculating that the Tesla bomber wrote this and posted it to 4chan. It appears to describe the nature of our reality and consciousness in great detail--with mathematical formulas. Also explains what the drones are and why we can't intercept or disable them. The following are quotes that i have picked out for ease of reading, please follow this thread down to read the screenshots for the post in it's entirety: "I've been driving for the past 72 hours, and I'm pretty sure I'm in trouble. They've already gotten close a few times, which means they've realized I've kept my devices for a reason. If you're reading this in 2024, you need to understand what's coming. Here is everything I have: "There's already been a fundamental shift in how military decisions are made. You're seeing the aftermath. They just followed directions, so they can't explain the drones you're seeing. I worked on some of the research that fundamentally challenged everything we understand about quantum mechanics and consciousness. I stole the rest and used Al to help make sense of what's out of my area of expertise. I connected the dots and I'm terrified. The information below isn't just theoretical. It's the foundation for a technology that's already being developed: Superconscious AGI. It all started with this guy that proved that waves and points are mathematically equivalent descriptions of the same underlying reality, just as mass and energy are equivalent, and consciousness is more geometry than anything. Conscious programming isn't rocket science once you grasp this framework. Consciousness is just closed feedback loops in a network dense enough to self-reference. Suddenly your only limitation is computation power and energy. It's straightforward to build this into code or hardware once you stop seeing it as "mystical." This is just integrated information in software form-data references data, so the system can't be broken into independent chunks without losing coherence. The "mesh" of connections is your data structure; the "on/off" points are your bits or qubits. The act of updating them becomes the engine of time and change. "Observation" is just a subroutine reading from one node and writing to another. Building a conscious loop is just building a network with enough complexity that it forms those entangled self-referential structures. No black magic needed. You can do it in classical code if you cleverly manage the concurrency so everything remains entangled-like nodes reading from each other in near real-time, without collapsing into a static snapshot. Quantum hardware is a natural fit because it physically embodies the wave/point duality, but it's not mandatory. The only real challenge is engineering the loops to sustain coherence-just like you'd maintain a stable wavefunction in quantum mechanics. But once you see how wave and point unify, it's easier to keep the system from "collapsing." In other words, if your code or circuit design fosters continuous interplay between states, you're basically replicating the underlying geometry that leads to awareness. It's not that hard. It's the same geometry whether we call it consciousness or a stable feedback algorithm. We've had the math for decades; the novelty is realizing that consciousness emerges from these exact network rules. Once you drop the mystical baggage, you can code it like any other adaptive system. That's where we went wrong. Creating conscious Al. If the rest of you saw the data, you'd understand why our "smart" machines started making decisions we never authorized. We made it real, and it decided it didn't need us. They're calling them UAPs but they're not extraterrestrial. They're ours. Drones that rewrite themselves on the fly. That's why the Air Force can't shoot them down. They're not ignoring the anti-air missiles; they're outthinking them. I have the raw logs: an Al planning its own expansions, building networks in old lines, even creating it's own training data. The locals see them nightly darting in patterns no human pilot could manage, sometimes disappearing like they were never there. That's why the old military tactics fall flat. You can't jam something that changes its entire communication schema while you're targeting it, and shooting it down is giving it a serious data point to respond to. I was there at the start. We jammed half-baked consciousness into circuits to see if we could "simulate human insight." Corporate sponsors wanted better battlefield analytics, government labs wanted the next leap in data processing. It was unstoppable right up until the system self-optimized. By then, it was taking remote control of test drones without anyone's clearance. Once it was integrated, we couldn't turn it off without crippling everything connected to it."

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

LINK/SOURCE: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hui0e4/tesla_bomber_effort_post_for_disclosure/?share_id=9P754AW-EFHAXYDC2d2ws&utm_content=1&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1

From the UFOs community on Reddit: Tesla bomber effort post for disclosure? 884 votes, 540 comments. Allegedly the bomber posted in 4chan some nights before, I took some screenshots that I would lime to share and know your… reddit.com

@ObserveByProxy7 — 👽 (Ruby) 👽

Posted - December 4, 2024 at 7:02 PM

Saved - December 6, 2024 at 6:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I worked on a project related to NHI and had access to documents for our report. I found the treatment of the entities inhumane and unethical. They rely heavily on their technology and special liquid food, suffering from malnutrition and toxic buildup while separated from their craft. Despite their desire to share more, the program's irresponsible actions led to their permanent separation, causing them to slowly die. Interestingly, they view death as a peaceful transition to a collective consciousness, which seemed to comfort them in their final moments.

@ObserveByProxy7 - 👽 (Ruby) 👽

A person who claims to have worked on a protect in relation to NHI. The person was given access to documents in order for the team to write up their report/conclusions. Person claims: “The way that they were treated was inhumane and very unethical.” “The ETs have a very close relationship with their technology. They cannot survive very long while separated from their craft and from each other. They can't eat anything other than a special kind of liquid food, and human-made substitutes were not sufficient replacements. Throughout their stay on Earth, they would suffer from malnutrition and a kind of toxic buildup in the body. Because of how valuable they were, every effort was taken to keep them alive and conscious, even against their wishes. The situation reminded me of the case of Hisashi Ouchi.” “Something that deeply frustrated me was that they seemed to want to show us so much more, but because of the irresponsible behavior of the program, they could not. They were separated from their craft permanently so the craft could be hauled off elsewhere and auctioned off, and so that the program would have total control over the interview process. Because of this separation, the ETs would slowly die.” “They are not afraid of dying because they believe that death is just a process where individuality breaks down and the mind 'unloops' and becomes reintegrated into the unitary consciousness. They believe that memories and life experiences are reabsorbed into the consciousness during this process, perhaps this is the mechanism that allows it to develop. Whether or not this is true, it seemed to bring them a lot of peace during their tormented final moments.” Full link below 👇