reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @OnlyMobKing

OnlyMobKing
Posted - October 25, 2024 at 7:56 PM
Saved - October 26, 2024 at 6:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nick Fuentes explores the influence of Jewish billionaires on American politics, particularly focusing on the Claremont Institute and the Manhattan Institute. He discusses how figures like Bill Ackman and Paul Singer have pressured institutions like Harvard to suppress pro-Palestine activism. Fuentes critiques Chris Rufo for omitting the Israeli connections within these think tanks while advocating for censorship against perceived anti-Semitism. He argues that the post-Trump conservative movement is being reshaped by these influences, promoting a colorblind meritocracy that aligns with pro-Israel interests.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨🇮🇱 𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐅𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭-𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐞𝐫𝐚‼️ 🔥(𝑨 𝑽𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒐-𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅)🧵 https://t.co/MFh6pedeu5

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨🇮🇱Nick discusses how Israeli interests motivated the attack on schools, noting that the Manhattan Institute covered up a plagiarism story about Ackman’s wife and is funded by Paul Singer‼️ “TikTok was banned by Congress under pressure from the Jewish lobby. Anti-Semitism laws codify the definition of anti-Semitism in various states, deploying anti-Semitism monitors and interpreting civil rights law on campuses. These were two separate laws passed in Congress to shut down pro-Palestine protests. A group of students at Harvard who published an open letter justified the Hamas attacks, and there were major pro-Palestine demonstrations at Harvard. If there is a strain of pro-Palestine sympathy at Harvard, Israel must be deeply concerned, because that may be expressed in future generations of America’s elites. If the United States elite in both the private and public sectors did not have affinity with Israel, it could seriously compromise the aid that Israel relies upon for survival, as the most powerful country in the world needs to be their critical benefactor.” “Bill Ackman graduated from Harvard, and he is a Jewish Zionist. He is a major donor to Harvard and donates every year. He’s also a lifelong Democrat donor. Ackman began an activist campaign on the Harvard campus to shut down the protests on behalf of Israel. He coordinated in a group chat with over a hundred New York City elites, including other billionaires, the mayor, and members of the police force, to quash the protests. He organized with other billionaires, congressmen, media, and conservative activist groups to apply pressure on Harvard to shut down the activism. Ackman went after the president of Harvard, Claudine Gay, who is a DEI hire. She replaced the former Jewish president. So it was very clear that the goal of targeting Claudine Gay with this high-pressure campaign in media, Congressional hearings, and on-campus activism was about her refusal to shut down pro-Palestine activism.” “Claudine Gay resigned due to a plagiarism scandal that had been published about a year earlier by Chris Rufo and Chris Brunet, revealing that in her scholarship, she improperly cited some things. Ackman found the scandal and used it as a credible attack to pressure her to step down amidst a high-pressure activist billionaire campaign to force the resignation of three Ivy League presidents at Harvard, UPenn, and Columbia. The presidents were not Jewish, unlike others, and they entertained pro-Palestine activism. Chris Rufo, a senior fellow, and Chris Brunet worked for the Manhattan Institute, which is funded by Paul Singer, another Jewish, pro-Israel Zionist billionaire in the finance space who is an activist donor. His two big causes are gay rights and Israel. He is a mega-donor for Republicans like Bush and Trump.” “Brunet found out that Ackman’s wife, an Israeli-born Jewish academic, had heavily plagiarized in her scholarship as well. Claudine Gay improperly cited things; it was not technically plagiarism. Brunet discovered that Ackman’s wife had copied entire sections from Wikipedia and passed them off as her own. The Manhattan Institute told him he could not publish that piece. He was told in group chats and quite forcefully in private that he should not continue to explore that lead. At the same time they shut down a far worse plagiarism scandal, which would have implicated Bill Ackman’s wife, Rufo was seeking additional funding from Bill Ackman. After October 7th, Ackman shifted his party affiliation from lifelong Democrat to Republican and started giving to Republican causes. Suddenly, Paul Singer, a lifelong Republican, pro-Israel Jewish supporter of the Manhattan Institute, and Bill Ackman, a lifelong Democrat but also Jewish and pro-Israel, were suddenly supporting the same think tank and the same mission: to overthrow the Ivy League presidents who supported Palestine over Israel.”

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨⚠️Nick points out that after Brunet exposed Rufo’s Israeli influence operation, everyone called him unstable instead of addressing the substance‼️ “Brunet came out a year later after being fired and admitted on Twitter last week that indeed Claudine Gay was fired because she didn’t toe the line on Israel. He was attacked viciously by his former mentor, Chris Rufo. Chris Rufo did not address the substance of what Brunet said; rather, Chris Rufo stated that Brunet was troubled, was fired for being disrespectful, and has mental problems, going towards a dark place.” “IM 1776, a publication funded by Claremont, began to attack Chris Brunet, among many, many others. They all came out to attack him, and again, did not address the substance of the allegation, which is this tremendous double standard. Specifically, the source of the funding of the think tank, their seeming complicity in a foreign influence operation, and passing off the plagiarism story as though it was some victory for academic integrity, when in reality they were serving as an extension of Israel’s foreign ministry.” “Chris Brunet raised the concern that two writers in particular, Leor Sapir and Ilya Shapiro, who are also fellows at the Manhattan Institute, might have a pro-Israel bias. He was called anti-Semitic for saying that. Leor Sapir was born in Israel and served in Israel’s military. Ilya Shapiro works at another think tank, which is specifically a Jewish policy think tank that serves to advance Israel’s national security interests. There was another Jewish academic who attacked Chris Brunet, a guy by the name of Nathan Cofnas. He said that Chris Brunet is a vile anti-Semite. But recently unearthed videos reveal that Nathan Cofnas said in a Zoom call earlier this year that Jews will hysterically call people anti-Semites when they don’t have an argument, and it’s getting ridiculous.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Brunet claimed Claudine Gay was fired for not supporting Israel. Chris Ruffo, Brunet's former mentor, responded by attacking Brunet's character, calling him troubled and disrespectful, and suggesting mental health issues. Other conservatives and the publication 1776 also attacked Brunet, without addressing his claims of a double standard, think tank funding, or complicity in a foreign influence operation. Brunet raised concerns about pro-Israel bias of Leo Sapor, who was born in Israel and served in its military, and Ilya Shapiro, who works at a Jewish policy think tank. Brunet was labeled antisemitic for this. Jeremy Koffness, who called Brunet an antisemite, was revealed to have said earlier this year that Jews will hysterically call people antisemite when they don't have an argument.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He comes out a year later after being fired and admits on Twitter last week that indeed, Claudine Gay was not fired for academic integrity reasons. She was fired because she didn't tow the line on Israel. In response to this, he was attacked viciously by his former mentor, Chris Ruffo. Chris Ruffo did not address the substance of what Brunette said, rather, Chris Ruffo said that Brunette was troubled. He was fired for being disrespectful and that he has mental problems and is going towards a dark place. And all of a sudden, a number of other conservatives started attacking him as well. Chris Ruffo attacked Burnett. I'm 1776, a publication funded by Claremont, began to attack Chris Burnett among many many others. Some of which we've talked about in previous weeks. They all came out to attack him. And, again, not addressing the substance of the allegations, which is this tremendous double standard, which is the source of the funding of the think tank, there seeming complicity in a foreign influence operation, passing off the plagiarism story as though that was some victory for academic integrity, when in reality, they were serving as an extension of Israel's foreign ministry. They never addressed the substance. They just called him crazy, troubled. They said that he was insane and maybe mentally ill and maybe needs a therapist or something. At the Manhattan Institute, we found at least 2 people working there that also have sympathies for Israel. Chris Burnett raised the concern that 2 writers in particular, Leo Sapor and Ilya Shapiro, or also fellows at Manhattan Institute, might have a pro Israel bias. He was called anti Semitic for saying that. But Lior Sapper and Ilya Shapiro both have an obvious conflict of interest. Lior Sapper was born in Israel and served in Israel's military. Ilyush Shapiro works at another think tank which is specifically a Jewish policy think tank which serves to advance Israel's national security interests. So I think it's well founded, but he was called an anti Semite for that. There was another Jewish academic who attacked Chris Brunette, a guy by the name of Jeremy Koffness. He said that Chris Brunette is a vile anti semite. But, recently, unearthed videos revealed that Jeremy Kofnis himself said in a zoom call earlier this year that Jews will hysterically call people antisemite when they don't have an argument and it's getting ridiculous. I guess he changed his tune.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨📰Nick dissects Chris Rufo’s article for Compact magazine, where Rufo calls for censoring groypers and anti-Semites and labels anyone who challenges operations like his as irrational‼️ “Rufo wrote a piece in a magazine called Compact, which was founded by Sohrab Amari, a former editor for the New York Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is a donor for Netanyahu and a close personal friend of his. Sohrab is the editor and the founder of Compact, which published a piece by Chris Rufo attacking Chris Brunet and me. The article calls for total censorship of so-called racial anti-Semites. The term racism was created by Leon Trotsky, real name Lev Bronstein. The cultural Marxism and social Marxism that we see in academia today come from Columbia University, where the Frankfurt School fled to after Hitler took over Germany. The Institute for Social Research, or Frankfurt School, left Frankfurt when Hitler came to power because they were Jewish Communists. They carried on their work at Columbia, promulgating what we call cultural Marxism or critical race theory. Chris Rufo says that’s an anti-Semitic fringe conspiracy theory and should be censored.” “Trump destroyed the intellectual consensus within conservatism. Now who will create that new right-wing consensus? The right-wingers are terrified that it will be more nationalist, more Christian, more pro-white, and more traditional than what came before. When we say that Israel influences our politics, they say it is based on mental illness, irrational conspiratorial thinking, envy, resentment, fear, and the impulse to locate a scapegoat. An idea in the philosophy of René Girard, a favorite of Thiel. It wasn’t about plagiarism because when the protégé at the Manhattan Institute found worse plagiarism, it was buried because that academic was Israeli and the wife of another pro-Israel Jewish donor. They declined to cover a worse plagiarism scandal for someone that serves Israel’s security interests. The conflict of interest of their donors, like Paul Singer, and their fellows, like Leor Sapir and Ilya Shapiro.” “Chris Rufo, who leads the Manhattan Institute, publishes an article and says anybody talking about this story should be censored on the internet. He says the problem with free speech is there are no gatekeepers; there’s no control. We don’t get to control the conversation. Now that Trump has made everybody stop believing establishment Republicans, now the GOP base will believe anybody. Since Twitter allows every opinion, now they might believe these conspiracy theorists talking about Paul Singer and Bill Ackman and the state of Israel. He says then they should be censored because they’re conspiracy theorists. They’re not facts; it’s rooted in fear, envy, scapegoating. He says that since Donald Trump destroyed the right, the new project is to gatekeep the conspiracy theorists, gatekeep the Groypers, and the alt-right. Anybody who thinks that it should be America first and restore the intellectual consensus around what he calls a colorblind meritocracy. Judging individuals on their merits, fair play, colorblind equality. Who exactly does that benefit in the United States?” “If you go to Sovereign House, Claremont Institute, or any of these organizations, you’ll find it’s all Jewish people. Were they judging each other on their merits as individuals? Jews can operate as a collective, but we must treat them as individuals. When Jewish people go and give their billions to groups to support Israel’s national security interests, we have to let them because they’re individuals as opposed to agents of a foreign state. Compact is funded by Alex Soros, Peter Thiel, and Thomas Klingenstein. Paul Singer, Bill Ackman, Rupert Murdoch, Alex Soros, Peter Thiel, Klingenstein: they’re funding all these different projects, and every one of the anonymous Twitter people, they’re all downstream from that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Ruffo intensified his attacks on Burnett in a Compact magazine article, calling for censorship of those he labels as antisemitic conspiracy theorists. He argues that critical race theory and concepts like racism originated from Jewish figures and institutions, framing this as a threat to traditional conservatism. Ruffo claims that the rise of Trump has created an intellectual vacuum, allowing fringe ideas to gain traction. He criticizes the Manhattan Institute, funded by pro-Israel donors, for allegedly prioritizing foreign interests over American values. Ruffo insists that discussions around Israel's influence should be censored, labeling dissenters as mentally ill or conspiratorial. He questions the meritocracy narrative, suggesting it benefits certain groups while ignoring collective identities. Ultimately, he portrays the current ideological struggle within conservatism as a battle against perceived threats to a color-blind meritocracy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Day, Chris Ruffo amplified and escalated his attacks on Burnett. He wrote a piece in a magazine called Compact, which was founded by Sohrab Amari. Sohrab Amari is an Iranian Catholic illiberal former editor for the New York Post. As you know, the New York Post is owned by News Corp which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch is a donor for Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel and a close personal friend of his. Rupert Murdoch was a client of Roy Cohn. Rupert Murdoch is as Zionist as it gets. And Sohrab Amari worked for one of his papers as an editor at the New York Post. So Sohrab Amari is the editor of and the founder of this new magazine, Compact, which published a piece by Chris Ruffo attacking Chris Burnett and me. And this is what the article says. It calls for total censorship of so called racialist antisemites like the Groypers. Critical race theory was invented by Jews. By the way, that is a true statement. The term racism was created by Leon Trotsky. Leon Trotsky changed his name from Lev Braunstein. You may know him. He is the leader of the Red Army in the Russian Revolution a 100 years ago. And all of the cultural Marxism, social Marxism that we see in academia today, of course, comes from Columbia University where the Frankfurt School fled to after Hitler took over Germany. Well, why did the Institute For Social Research or Frankfurt School need to leave Frankfurt when Hitler came to power? Because they were Jewish communists. And they carried on their work at Columbia promulgating what we call cultural Marxism or critical race theory. So Chris Ruffo says that's an anti Semitic fringe conspiracy theory. And later on, he'll say that should be censored, but it is a fact. Would I be mentally ill for drawing those connections? So he's saying that when Trump comes along and makes everybody stop believing in National Review and the GOP establishment and Fox News, he says it creates this intellectual vacuum where conspiracy theorists can get in. And now there's this intellectual battle to define what comes next after Trump. This is something I've been talking about for 7 or 8 years. Trump destroyed the intellectual consensus within conservatism. Now there is an arms race, an intellectual arms race going on within conservatism about who will create that new right wing consensus. And these right wingers are terrified that it will be us. They are terrified that it will be more nationalist, more Christian, more pro white, more traditional than what came before, what was promulgated by William f Buckley or Bill Kristol or Irving Kristol or writers like that. Conspiratorial thinking which might be true. Like, for example, that Paul Singer is directing the Manhattan Institute to take down Claudine Gay because she wants the next generation of elites to like Palestine instead of Israel. He's talking about the right and left wing antisemitism. When we say that Israel influences our politics, they say that is not based in fact. It is not based on righteous indignation. It's not based on patriotism. They say it is based on mental illness, irrational conspiratorial thinking, envy, resentment, fear, and the impulse to locate a scapegoat. An idea which features prominently in the philosophy of Rene Girard who is a favorite of Peter Thiel. If the squad and the Groypers have their way with their envy and fear and resentment, then we will lose the color blind meritocracy that America used to be. Before that, they were segregated and lived in ghettos and shtetls speaking Yiddish and having their own courts and not having the same rights because they're a stateless people. So he said, in 17/90, America was the first time they achieved full equality within a national polity, which would be America. So let me get this straight. If you've been following all of this so far, the Manhattan Institute, which Chris Ruffo works for, is funded by a pro Israel billionaire. That means it works for a foreign country. That's different than being pro freedom or pro gun or pro choice or pro life. Being pro Israel in America is effectively a form of treason. What would you think if somebody was pro Iran, or pro Russia, or pro China, or pro Mexico, or pro Venezuela, or pro Cuba? We would be rightly insulted and offended and we would find something wrong with it. Paul Singer is Jewish. Israel is the Jewish state. He supports Israel while living in America at America's expense. And he funds the Manhattan Institute and its projects, which serve the national security interests of Israel, a foreign state. Like, for example, pushing a hit piece against Claudine Gay at Harvard because she was not cracking down on pro Palestine protests hard enough. Those protests that might have pressured the Biden administration to restrain Israel's foreign policy. And we know that this was a pretext. We know that it wasn't about plagiarism because when the protege at the Manhattan Institute found worse plagiarism from another academic, it was buried because that academic was Israeli and the wife of another activist pro Israel Jewish donor. So we know based on that, the Manhattan Institute carried out a fake smear campaign on behalf of Israel's national security interests. We know that because they declined to cover a worse plagiarism scandal for someone that serves Israel's security interests, And we know that because of the conflict of interest of their donors like Paul Singer and their fellows like Lior Sapor and Ilya Shapiro. This is all factual. None of this has been disputed. None of this has been debated. If anything, it's been omitted and they have tried to sweep it under the rug and redirect our attention to other things. Chris Burnett exposed this. In response, they called him crazy, said he was going to a dark place. They said this was the result of childhood trauma. A whole chorus of individuals and groups all connected to the same donors did this. Now, Chris Rufo who leads Manhattan Institute publishes an article and says, anybody talking about this story should be censored on the Internet. He says, the problem with free speech is there's no gatekeepers. There's no control. We don't get to control the conversation. Now that Trump has made everybody stop believing establishment Republicans, now the GOP base will believe anybody. And since Twitter allows every opinion, now they might believe these conspiracy theorists talking about Paul Singer and Bill Ackman and the State of Israel. He says that they should be censored. They should be censored because they're conspiracy theorists. They're not facts. It's rooted in fear, envy, scapegoating. He says that since Donald Trump destroyed the right, the new project is to gatekeep the conspiracy theorist, gatekeep the gropers and the outright, anybody who thinks that it should be America first, and restore the intellectual consensus around what he calls a color blind meritocracy, judging individuals on their merits. Judging individuals on their merits, fair play, color blind equality. Who exactly does that benefit in the United States? And let me ask this. Do you believe that Ben Shapiro is judging individuals on their merit? Or do you think that if you're Jewish, Ben Shapiro would take a shine to you? And what about Bill Ackman? And what about what about Paul Singer? What about these people at this group? If you go to Sovereign House, if you go to Claremont Institute, if you go to any of these organizations, you'll find it's all Jewish people. Were they judging each other on their merits as individuals? When they talk about Jews being the victim of antisemitism, when they talk about what a catastrophe it is that Jewish enrollment is falling at Ivy Leagues, is that about individualism or is that about them as a group? Is Israel a land of individuals or is Israel the collectivized form of the Jewish community in the world? So the Israelis and the Jewish people can operate as a collective, but we must treat them as individuals. When Jewish people go and give their billions to groups to support Israel's national security interest, we have to let them because they're individuals as opposed to agents of a foreign state. And if we have a problem with that, well, we're mentally ill or conspiracy theorists or we're just jealous or blaming them for our failures.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

✡️💰Nick Fuentes discusses who funds Compact to support Rufo’s call for censorship of any criticism of Jews while advocating for colorblindness and anti-racialism‼️ “Chris Rufo published this piece calling for the censorship of Groypers in Compact magazine, run by Sohrab Ahmari. Compact is funded by George and Alex Soros through the OSF. The Open Society Foundation takes its name from a book by a philosopher named Karl Popper, who said that the only way to prevent another Holocaust is to create an open society where there will be tolerance, diversity, pluralism, colorblindness, fair play, and individual rights. Karl Popper is the architect of what we would call globalism progressivism. Compact published Chris Rufo, who says we’re undermining fair play and colorblindness. Conspiracy theorists pointing to this Israeli-funded operation are abusing free speech, and they’re not legitimate opinions, and they must be crushed. Compact is authoritarian, which is confusing because the Open Society Foundation typically supports liberal tenets unless the discourse is anti-Semitic. Soros is not opposed to Israel. Soros is one of the biggest backers of Israeli causes. The difference is that Soros is a left-wing Israeli, so he supports progressives and liberals and leftists inside of Israel. He’s still an ardent Zionist; he just finds himself on the other side of a factional dispute with other Zionists.” “Rupert Murdoch, a backer of Netanyahu, owns Fox News and News Corp. The Likud party is the right-wing party; they’re in favor of a revision of Zionism, meaning expanding Israel’s territory through war. Before October 7th, there was the left, which opposed Netanyahu and his judicial reform, the one-state solution, and the solidification of Likud’s power over the state and the courts. Soros backs Netanyahu’s enemies. Netanyahu is tight with Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Soros backs opposition media in Hungary. Soros backs the left-wing opposition in Israel that’s protesting Netanyahu’s judicial reform. The political left and right are both funded by Jewish billionaires that are pro-Israel. They differ in their vision for the Israeli state. Soros pours billions of dollars into Israel; he just puts them behind progressive causes in Israel. American politics seems to be a proxy battle between the two sides of Israel’s politics because their billionaires put up the money for our politics.” “Compact is also funded by Peter Thiel and Tom Klingenstein. Half of Thiel’s net worth comes from Palantir. Jewish CEO Alex Karp flew the whole Board of Palantir to Israel after October 7th and said venture capital and private equity are coming together behind Israel. Palantir reserved 200 jobs just for Jews because of what’s happening to them. Thiel gave Vance $15 million to run in the Senate primary, securing Trump’s endorsement for J.D. Vance, which made him win the primary and become the senator and push Trump to make him vice president. Peter Thiel is one of the major backers for the Claremont Institute, which is one of the main think tanks providing that intellectual framework for a post-establishmentarian American right wing that Chris Rufo describes. Chris Rufo says after Trump blew up the institutions, there’s a vacuum, and now the right wing is figuring out a new intellectual consensus. The group that is figuring that out is one among them is Claremont, which is also backed by Paul Singer, who funds the Manhattan Institute. Tom Klingenstein is a major donor for the Claremont Institute and its current chairman. Compact magazine is funded by Alex Soros, Peter Thiel, and Tom Klingenstein. It’s funded by the OSF and Claremont, backed in part by News Corp publishing. Rufo says that we are poisoning the well for the post-establishmentarian right-wing consensus that’s being built after Trump with anti-Semitism and racialism.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Ruffo, a prominent conservative, is now advocating for censorship, contradicting the conservative principle of free speech. His call for censorship follows a scandal involving foreign influence in right-wing think tanks. Ruffo's article in Compact Magazine, funded by George Soros, criticizes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and calls for silencing dissenting opinions. Soros, a significant donor to progressive causes in Israel, supports leftist factions, while Rupert Murdoch backs right-wing elements. Both sides of the political spectrum are funded by wealthy Jewish donors with differing visions for Israel. Ruffo's push for censorship targets those exposing these funding dynamics, framing them as harmful to the conservative movement's future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chris Ruffo is a major conservative, and he's basically now calling for censorship. So just process that for a moment. When conservatives start to talk about who's funding the think tanks, when they start to talk about Israel's national security interest in our country, when they talk about conflicts of interest, then they wanna call for censorship. The same conservative movement that says free speech, open marketplace of ideas, sunlight is the best disinfectant, Answer bad ideas with good ideas. They're now calling for censorship. Now that Twitter has no censorship, they say there should be more. Now that there are no gatekeepers, they say there should be. Now that they say that there is no institutional control over the right, they're arguing that they should be controlling the right. And they get to decide what legitimate opinions are. And all of this is in response again to a major bombshell scandal about a basically, a foreign spying ring in one of the big think tanks on the right. So Chris Ruffo published this piece calling for the censorship of the Groypers in Compact Magazine which is run by Sohrab Amari. It came out today in Vanity Fair. The Compact Magazine gets its funding from George Soros and his son, Alex Soros, through the Open Society Foundation. And for those who don't know, George and Alex Soros are Jewish, British financiers. As you know, they bankroll the left. They bankroll Media Matters. They bankroll right wing watch, People For the American Way. If you've seen a hit piece against right wingers, it's getting paid for by Soros. If you see a BLM prosecutor decline to prosecute a criminal, it's a George Soros funded prosecutor. He's one of the biggest donors for the Democratic Party. Open Society Foundation takes its name from a book by a philosopher named Karl Popper. He said that the only way to prevent another holocaust, which was created by Hitler and the Nazis, is to create an open society where there will be tolerance, diversity, pluralism, color blindness, fair play, individual rights. Karl Popper, who wrote Open Society, is the architect of what we would call globalism. He's the architect of what we would call progressivism, liberalism. Everything that's wrong with the conservative party. He said the only way to make sure that never again can a collectivist, nationalist, fascist state arise to snuff out the Jewish people is if we throw open the borders, open our minds, and become tolerant of every religion, every race within our borders, in our communities, in our homes, and become liberal. And Soros has taken the name from that book because that is what he uses his funds to achieve. Opening the borders, creating diversity, tolerance, color blindness so that we will never get another authoritarian leader against the Jewish people of which he is a constituent. So Soros funds Compact Magazine, which published Chris Ruffo, who says, we're undermining fair play and color blindness. These conspiracy theorists pointing to this Israeli funded operation are abusing free speech and they're not legitimate opinions and they must be crushed. It was funded by Alex Soros. Soros funds Compact. Compact is authoritarian, which is confusing because the Open Society Foundation typically supports liberal tenets like public spheres with unobstructed discourse. Unless, of course, the discourse is anti semitic, then I would imagine Open Society and Compact Magazine are in favor of the roadblocks. And then they're suddenly consistent. Then it's suddenly not so confusing why Soros might fund the publication that is calling for the censorship of antisemites and. Remember these names. So Compact is funded by Alex Soros, Peter Thiel, and Thomas Klingenstein. Remember these names. Paul Singer, Bill Ackman, Rupert Murdoch, Alex Soros, Peter Thiel, Tom Klingenstein. What do they all have in common that they're funding all these different projects? And every one of the anonymous Twitter people, all the Bapis you follow, they're all downstream from that. But so Ruffo publishes an article in Compaq saying, censor the antisemites, censor conspiracy theorists. It's gone too far. Those are not legitimate opinions. And Amari says, the problem with the open society is that it's characterized by censorship. So he only has a problem with censorship unless it's directed against anti semites, then they're in favor of it. And so is Soros. Now get this. So Compaq Magazine is funded by George Soros. And, you know, people say that Soros is opposed to Israel, but that's not true. Soros is one of the biggest backers of Israeli causes. The difference is is that Soros is a left wing Israeli. So he supports progressives and liberals and leftists inside of Israel. He's still an ardent Zionist. He just finds himself on the other side of a factional dispute with other Zionists. So Rupert Murdoch supports Netanyahu. Rupert Murdoch owns Fox News and new News Corp, which are huge on the right wing. Rupert Murdoch is a backer of Netanyahu, who is a prime minister from the Lykud party. The Lykud party is the right wing party. They're in favor of revision of Zionism, meaning expanding Israel's territory through war, going to war against Iran, Iraq, Syria. They frequently partner up with the religious Jewish extremists. On the other side in Israel, before October 7th was the left, which opposed Netanyahu and its judicial reform, which opposed the one state solution, which opposed the solidification of Lykut's power over the state and the courts. And that side was backed by Soros. Are you starting to understand now why on Fox News, you can criticize Soros, but you can't criticize Miriam Adelson? Are you starting to understand are you starting to understand why Ben Shapiro, Alex Jones, The Blaze, Fox News, they can say all day long, we don't like George Soros. Wanna know why? Because on Fox News, they're owned by Murdoch who backs Netanyahu. Soros backs Netanyahu's enemies. Netanyahu is tight with Viktor Orban in Hungary. Soros backs opposition media in Hungary. Soros backs the left wing opposition in Israel that's protesting Netanyahu's judicial reform. But whether it's the political left, which is publishing hit pieces against the right funded by Soros, or the political right, which is attacking Soros on Fox News, they're both funded by Jewish billionaires that are pro Israel. The only thing they differ in is what their vision is for the Israeli state. Soros pours 1,000,000,000 of dollars into Israel. He just puts them behind progressive causes in Israel because Israel, like America, has 2 parties. American politics seems to be a proxy battle between the two sides of Israel's politics because their billionaires put up the money for our politics. Chris Ruffo is exposed. He's taking money from Jewish billionaire, Paul Singer, to go after Israel's enemies in academia. He gets exposed and everybody sees it and everybody is asking questions. So he goes in Compact Magazine and says, shut it down. This conversation is knowledge intimate. It's based in fear and envy, and it needs to be censored on Twitter. The magazine he publishes it in in is paid for by Soros who pays for all the right wing hit pieces, pays for all the open borders, all the favorable BLM prosecutors. But it's also funded by Peter Thiel and Tom Klingenstein. Peter Thiel, as we've talked about frequently on the show, is an American billionaire. He's not Jewish. Half of his net worth comes from Palantir, which is the intelligence contractor that he founded 20 years ago with Alex Karp. Alex Karp is Jewish. He's the CEO of Palantir. As I've said before, Alex Karp flew the whole board of Palantir, the source of half of Peter Thiel's net worth, to Israel after October 7th and said, venture capital and private equity are coming together behind Israel. And they said, we're reserving 200 jobs at Palantir just for Jews because of what's happening to them. And Alex Karp says his biggest fear is that Christian nationalists will throw him out of a window when they take power in America. And from top to bottom, Palantir is infiltrated by the Mossad. And all of Palantir's allies are pushing Israeli front intelligence and defense companies in the United States. They all come from unit 8200 in Israel's IDF. Peter Thiel not only funds Compact, but he also bankrolled JD Vance, gave him $15,000,000 to run-in the senate primary, secured Trump's endorsement for JD Vance, which made him win the primary and become the senator, and pushed Trump to make him the vice president. Moreover, Peter Thiel is one of the major backers for the Claremont Institute. The Claremont Institute is one of the main think tanks providing that intellectual framework for a postestablishmentarian American right wing that Chris Ruffo describes. Chris Ruffo says after Trump blew up the institutions, there's a vacuum, and now the right wing is figuring out a new intellectual consensus. The group that is figuring that out, one among them is Claremont, which is backed by Peter Thiel. And who is their other major donor? Paul Singer. Paul Singer who funds the Manhattan Institute. And who is the other donor for Compact Magazine? Tom Klingenstein. Tom Klingenstein is a major donor for the Claremont Institute and its current chairman. So Compact Magazine funded by Alex Soros, Peter Thiel and Tom Klingenstein. It's funded by Open Society Foundation and the Claremont Institute backing Saurabh Amari who used to be from Rupert Murdoch's News Corp publishing Chris Ruffo calling for Groypers to be censored because they exposed Paul Singer's influence operation at the Manhattan Institute, and he says that we are poisoning the well for the post establishmentarian right wing consensus that's being built after Trump. They're poisoning the well with anti semitism and racialism.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🌏🕎Nick Fuentes discusses the players behind NatCon and the Claremont Institute, highlighting how all of J.D. Vance’s intellectual influences are part of this Jewish influence operation‼️ “Peter Thiel also funds a group called The Edmund Burke Society, which puts on the annual National Conservatism Conference. NatCon hosts Thiel, Vance, Josh Hawley, Rubio, and DeSantis. It’s hosted by Saurabh Sharma, who runs American Moment, which will staff the Trump Administration. NatCon is run by Yoram Hazony, who is an old friend of Sohrab Ahmari. Hazony was born in Israel and lives in Israel. When he’s not running NatCon, he’s running the Herzl Institute in Israel. Yoram got his start 30 years ago when a group led by Irving Kristol funded his right-wing newspaper, the Princeton Tory at Princeton. That same group, led by Irving Kristol, funded Peter Thiel’s Stanford Review when Thiel was a student at Stanford roughly around the same time.” “At Thiel’s NatCon event, you had Curtis Yarvin, Josh Hammer, Michael Anton, and Sohrab Ahmari all hanging out. Yarvin, a Jew, writes Unqualified Reservations, which is published by Passage Press, which is run by Jonathan Keeperman, which receives funding from the Claremont Institute. Yarvin is the court philosopher of Thiel. Hammer is Jewish and used to write for The Daily Wire. Josh Hammer said that anti-Semitism is inherent in European DNA when writing for Ben Shapiro. Michael Anton is at the Claremont Institute. Michael Anton was a student of the founder of the Claremont Institute, Harry Jaffa, who is a West Coast Straussian. West Coast Straussians are hugely influential at Stanford, where Thiel was a student. Jaffa was a student of Leo Strauss, a Zionist Jew from Germany who was mentored by Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the progenitor of the Likud party. Anton was put in the National Security Council in the first Trump administration because Thiel was on Trump’s transition team. Thiel gave Trump millions, spoke at the RNC, became a part of the transition team, and then put Anton inside the administration.” “These are JD Vance’s intellectual influences according to Politico: The Claremont Institute, Peter Thiel, René Girard, who is Peter Thiel’s favorite philosopher, who Chris Rufo echoed in his piece, and Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel’s court philosopher, NatCon luminary, Passage Press author, and Sohrab Ahmari. Sohrab is a former communist, like his co-editors of Compact. Every neoconservative in the 1970s who founded the neocon movement were former Trotskyists. They were all Jews. The surprise attack on October 6, 1973, which started the Yom Kippur War. All the Jewish Trotskyists became neocons, became cold warriors backing Reagan, just like Sohrab Ahmari. But now, just like JD Vance, he has converted to Catholicism after being a neocon for all this time.” “Sohrab is tight with Vance. Trump goes out there in 2015 and he says Jewish donors won’t like me because I’m not going to take their money. He says Marco Rubio is a puppet of Sheldon Adelson. He says I won’t take from the international bankers and globalists like Hillary Clinton. It’s going to be only America First. Paul Singer doesn’t vote for Trump; he backs the Steele dossier, which is the Trump golden showers conspiracy from Russia. Ben Shapiro is a Never Trumper. He and National Review and all the conservatives condemn Trump. Bill Kristol, son of Irving Kristol, raises up a candidate from the CIA, Evan McMullin, and they run him as a spoiler in Utah. Sohrab votes for Hillary Clinton out of disgust for Trump because he’s odious and against the norms. Trump wins, and now they realize the GOP establishment consensus is in shambles.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Conservatism Conference, funded by Peter Thiel and run by Yoram Hazony, features prominent figures like JD Vance, Josh Hawley, and Michael Anton. Thiel, a key Trump supporter, influenced the administration by placing Anton in the National Security Council. The conference showcases thinkers like Curtis Yarvin and Josh Hammer, who have controversial views on anti-Semitism. JD Vance's intellectual influences include the Claremont Institute and Thiel. Many neoconservatives, once Trotskyists, shifted ideologies after the Yom Kippur War. In 2016, Trump campaigned against Jewish donors and globalists, leading to backlash from figures like Paul Singer and Ben Shapiro. Despite this, Trump’s victory disrupted the GOP establishment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's really such a vast conspiracy even beyond this. So this is another article from Vanity Fair. This is from 2022. Talks about National Conservatism Conference. So Peter Thiel also funds a group called the Edmund Burke Society, which puts on the annual National Conservatism Conference. And National Conservatism hosts Peter Thiel himself. It has hosted JD Vance, Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio, Ron DeSantis. It's hosted Saurabh Schwarma who runs American Moment which will staff the Trump administration, Amanda Melius, many others. Peter Thiel funds Natcon which is run by Yoram Hazony. Yoram Hazony is an old friend of Sohrab Amari. Yoram Hazony was born in Israel, lives in Israel. When he's not running Natcon, he's running the Herzl Institute in Israel. Yoram Hazony got a start 30 years ago when a group led by Irving Kristol, the godfather of neoconservatism, funded his right wing newspaper, the Princeton Tory at Princeton. That same group led by Irving Kristol funded Peter Thiel's Stanford Review when Peter Thiel was a student at Stanford roughly around the same time. So at NatCon, you had Curtis Yarvin, Josh Hammer, Michael Anton, Sohrab Amari. They're all together hanging out at Peter Thiel's Natcon event. For those that don't know, Curtis Yarvin is Jewish. He writes on Qualified Reservations, which is published by Passage Press, which is run by Jonathan Kieperman, which receives funding from the Claremont Institute. Curtis Yarvin is the court philosopher of Peter Thiel. Josh Hammer used to write for Daily Wire. That's where he got a start. Daily Wire, which is run by Ben Shapiro. Josh Hammer is also Jewish. Josh Hammer once said that anti semitism is inherent in European DNA. He said that Europeans are inherently antisemitic. All white people are antisemitic. It's in their blood. When he was writing for Ben Shapiro, now he's at Newsweek and at NatCon with Yarvin and Saurabh Amari. Among them also was Michael Anton. Michael Anton is at the Claremont Institute. Michael Anton was a student of the founder of Claremont Institute, Harry Jaffa, who was a West Coast Straussian. West Coast Straucians are hugely influential at Stanford where Peter Thiel was a student. And Harry Jaffa was a student of Leo Strauss, who is a Zionist Jew from Germany, who was mentored by Ziv Jabotinsky, the progenitor of the Lycud party in Israel. Michael Anton was put in the National Security Council in the first Trump administration because Peter Thiel was on Trump's transition team. Because Peter Thiel was one of the only Silicon Valley donors that backed Trump. So Peter Thiel gave Trump 1,000,000, spoke at the RNC, became a part of the transition team, and then planted Michael Anton inside the administration. And when they say he reads Machiavelli Machiavelli, he doesn't read Machiavelli. He reads Leo Strauss' interpretation of Machiavelli because that's what the Strausians are famous for. This is your crew at National Conservatism. It talks about JD Vance's 6 intellectual influences. 4 of them in particular are JD Vance, the future vice president. These are his intellectual influences according to Politico. The Claremont Institute, Peter Thiel, Rene Girard, who is Peter Thiel's favorite philosopher who Chris Ruffo echoes in his Peace and Compact, Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel's court philosopher, NatCon, Luminary, Passage Press, author, and Sohrab Amari. There's a lot there. So he was a former communist. You mean like his co editors at Compaq? You know who else were all former communists? All the neocons. Every neoconservative in the 19 seventies who founded the neocon movement were former Trotskyists. They were all Jews. And do you wanna know what made them become conservative? The surprise attack on October 5, 1973, which started the Yom Kippur War. And all the Jewish Trotskyists became neocons, became cold warriors backing Reagan just like Saurabh Amari. But now, just like JD Vance, he is converted to Catholicism after being a neocon for all this time. So Amari is tight with Vance. Crisis that is going on right now is this. In 2016, Trump runs a campaign with a skeleton crew. It's him and, like, 3 guys. He likes Ann Coulter's book. He tells Corey Lewandowski, give me a 100 Ann Coulter adiosamerica books. I'm gonna write my speech about immigration. Donald Trump goes out there in 2015, in June 15 and throughout the primary, and he says, Jewish donors won't like me because I'm not gonna take their money. He says Marco Rubio is a puppet of Sheldon Adelson. He says, America first. Make America great again. I won't take money from the international bankers and globalists like Hillary Clinton. It's gonna be only America first. Paul Singer doesn't vote for Trump. As a matter of fact, Paul Singer backs the Steele dossier, which is the Trump golden showers conspiracy from Russia. Paul Singer funded that. Paul Singer doesn't vote for Trump. Paul Singer hates Trump. Ben Shapiro is a never Trumper. He and National Review and all the conservatives condemned Trump. Bill Kristol, son of Irving Kristol, raises up a candidate from the CIA, Evan McMullen, and they run him as a spoiler in Utah. So Rob Amari votes for Hillary Clinton out of disgust for Trump because he's odious and against the norms. Trump wins, and now they realize the GOP establishment consensus is in shamble.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨🐸Nick Fuentes explains that Groypers advocate for nationalism, oppose Israeli interference, and disavow both legal and illegal immigration, but a subversion network is colluding to shape a post-Trump era defined by a colorblind meritocracy and Israeli occupation‼️ “After Trump cast doubt on the Iraq War wnd Israeli donors how do we intellectualize the new right after Trump destroyed the old one? It starts with Claremont. Claremont is funded by Straussians who are Zionists and Thiel, who is with Claremont, the CIA, backs Trump, and puts his people in the National Security apparatus. Darren Beattie, Mike Benz, and Anton. Claremont is funded by Singer, supports BAP, and backs all these people you see on the right. Like IM 1776 and other projects. We start to say the real vision of Trumpism is not colorblind meritocracy or multi-racial working-class populism. Not any of these other things that stress an open society. We said actually the true vision of Trump is nationalism, which must necessarily oppose the Israel lobby and foreign wars, free trade, and both legal and illegal immigration. We get censored on Twitter because Paul Singer’s Elliott Management is an activist investor in Twitter.” “Who is the heir apparent who gets to shape the post-Trump intellectual framework of the conservative movement after he leaves office? It’s JD Vance, who was at NatCon funded by Thiel, hosted by Hazony, attended by Yarvin and Ahmari. Vance spoke at the Quincy Institute, funded by the Open Society Foundation, Thiel and other donors. JD Vance receives all his money from Thiel. JD Vance has a personal relationship with Sohrab Ahmari , who worked for the New York Post, was a neocon, a former communist, and is now getting backing from the Open Society Foundation, Thiel, and Klingenstein. What Vance is promulgating, alongside Rufo and Ahmari, and BAP, and James Lindsay, is what they’re calling colorblind meritocracy. It’s not pro-white; it’s basically pro-Israel. They say that is going to be the intellectual successor, the intellectual heir to Trumpism. It is about recapitulating and redefining Trumpism. Vance is the VP, Trump is surrounded by Lubavitchers, Claremont shills, Thiel’s people, and Kushner’s people. They’ve recapitulated MAGA to mean colorblind meritocracy, individualism, a pro-Israel spin on America First. An occupation by Jewish billionaires with an allegiance to Israel. It’s Paul Singer, the pro-Israel Jew who backed George Bush in ’04, went against Trump, and funded the Steele dossier but now funds the Manhattan Institute, which took down Claudine Gay, and the Claremont Institute, which is creating your colorblind meritocracy consensus for the post-Trump right.” “Peter Thiel. Half his net worth in Alex Karp run Palantir, who gave Vance 15 million which made him a senator. You’ve got Tom Klingenstein, who backs Claremont and Compact, and Alex Soros, who backs Open Society, open borders, BLM, prosecutors, and Compact magazine. You’ve got Murdoch, who owns News Corp and Fox News, and supports Netanyahu’s PM campaign. Ackman used the plagiarism scandal to take down Claudine Gay because we can’t have free speech on an American university; it might convince Americans to stop sending guns to Israel to blow up Iran and Hamas. Michael Anton, who wrote Flight 93, Harry Jaffa’s mentor, Leo Strauss’ his mentor, and Thiel, and Yarvin, and René Girard, from whom they take their philosophy, which has a convenient interpretation for Jews. Rufo, Ahmari, Cofnas, IM 1776, and everybody affiliated with Claremont. The whole thing came undone, and we found out. Soros and Klingenstein and Thiel and Singer are all backing the same people. Even though they’re against or for authoritarianism, they all agree: open society, individualism, no anti-Semitism, no true free speech, gatekeepers on the right and left, no criticism of Israel. Vance the successor to steer the base back into neoconservatism, back into their colorblind, Jewish-blind meritocracy.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
National Review, the GOP, and Fox News have lost credibility, especially after Trump’s influence. The challenge now is to regain the trust of Trump voters and redefine the intellectual framework of the right. Claremont, backed by influential figures like Peter Thiel and Paul Singer, is attempting to reshape Trumpism into a colorblind meritocracy that aligns with pro-Israel sentiments. JD Vance is positioned as a potential successor to Trump, promoting ideas that diverge from traditional nationalism. This new direction is funded by various billionaires, leading to censorship of dissenting voices. The overarching issue is the influence of these donors on the conservative movement, steering it away from its original principles towards a more globalist agenda, while suppressing criticism of Israel and promoting a narrative that aligns with their interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: National Review, the GOP, Fox News, they have no credibility anymore. Even though Rupert Murdoch tried to stop him at the first debate, the people chose Trump over Fox News. So now they begin the task of how do we rebuild that intellectual consensus after Trump? How do we get the Trump voters back on board? How do we bring them back into the fray after Trump made them not trust us anymore? After Trump cast doubt on the Iraq war, after Trump cast doubt on Israeli donors, how do we bring them back into the fold? How do we intellectualize the new right after Trump destroyed the old one? And it starts with Clermont. Clermont is funded by Strausians who are Zionist liars. And Peter Thiel, who's with Claremont Peter Thiel is with the CIA and Palantir, backs Trump and puts his people in the national security apparatus. People like Darren Beatty, people like Mike Benz, people like Michael Anton. Like I said, Claremont is also funded by Paul Singer. It's also supporting Bronze Age Pervert. It's also supporting all these people you see on the right now, things like I am 1776 and all these other projects. But there starts to be a problem in 2019 when the Groypers emerge on the scene, and we start to say, no. The real vision of Trumpism is not whatever you're trying to create, which they've called color blind meritocracy, multiracial, working class populism, not any of these other things that stress the open society. We said, actually, the true vision of Trump to take it a step further is nationalism, which must necessarily oppose the Israel lobby and foreign wars and free trade and legal immigration as well as illegal immigration, and it must be Christian. Suddenly, they panic. We get censored on Twitter because Paul Singer's Elliott Management is an activist investor in Twitter. So the same period when all the Claremont people remained on Twitter, we were banned for that reason. Now over time, we've gotten hip and we've gotten wise and we've discovered what they're doing. We expose their schemes. We expose the billionaires. What's going on at Claremont? They call on us to be censored for saying it. But, ultimately, the true problem, it's not even these intramural arguments. It's not even these kinds of things. The real crisis is how all these people that are now calling for us to be censored, all these people that we know are in bed with Israeli donors like Ackman, Paul Singer, Peter Thiel, Tom Klingenstein, people at Claremont, their chief concern was what comes after Trump. Well, who is the heir apparent to Donald Trump right now? Let's say Donald Trump wins the presidency and JD Vance becomes the vice president. Who is the heir apparent? Who gets to shape the post Trump intellectual framework of the conservative movement after he leaves office? It's JD Vance. JD Vance who was at NatCon, funded by Peter Thiel, hosted by Hazony, attended by Yarvin and Saurabh Amari. JD Vance who spoke at Quincy Institute, funded by Open Society Foundation and funded by Peter Thiel and these other donors. I think it was Peter Thiel. I think it was one other one. JD Vance, who receives all his money from Peter Thiel. JD Vance, who was supported and has a personal relationship with Sohrab Amari, who worked for New York Post, who was a neo con, who was a former communist, who is now getting backing from Open Society Foundation, Peter Thiel and Tom Klingenstein. And what JD Vance is promulgating alongside Chris Ruffo and Sohrab Amari and Bronze Age Pervert and James Lindsay and all of them is what they're calling color blind meritocracy. It's not pro white. It's basically pro Israel. And they say that is going to be the intellectual successor, the intellectual heir to Trumpism. And it is about recapitulating, redefining Trumpism. Trump comes on the scene in 16 and says America first, no Jewish money, no immigrants. We're gonna say Merry Christmas. People said it was implicitly pro white. 10 years later, Vance is the vice president. Trump is surrounded by Chabad Lubavichers. He's surrounded by Claremont Schill's, Peter Thiel's people, Jared Kushner's people. And they've recapitulated MAGA to mean color blind meritocracy, individualism, pro a pro Israel spin on America first. That's what Vance called it at the Quincy Institute. And that's what they're doing now. They're taking money from George Soros, and they're taking money from Tom Klingenstein and Paul Singer to say that Groypers should be banned on Twitter, to say that we should have free speech, but not for anti semites, to say it's good to criticize the establishment, but not when you criticize Israeli donors, to say we're about academic integrity for Claudine Gay, but not for Bill Ackman's wife, to say you can be nationalistic, but not white nationalist. You can be Israeli nationalist, but not white identitarian. Do you now understand the extent of our occupation? That is the only way it can be described. An occupation by Jewish billionaires with an allegiance to Israel, let's name them again. It's Paul Singer, the pro Israel, pro gay Jew who bagged George Bush in 0 4, went against Trump in front of the Steele dossier, but now funds Manhattan Institute, which took down Claudine Gay, and Claremont Institute, which is creating your colorblind meritocracy consensus for the post Trump right. So you got Paul Singer. You have Peter Thiel, half his net worth, and Alex Karp run Palantir who gave 15,000,000 to Vance and made him a senator. You've got Tom Klingenstein who backs Claremont and who backs Compact. You've got Alex Soros who backs Open Society, Open Borders, BLM prosecutors, and Compact Magazine. You've got Rupert Murdoch who supports News Corp and Fox News and BB Netanyahu's prime minister campaign. These are the billionaires that are directing all of these things. That's where the money comes from. And that's why if you're on the take from Claremont or Manhattan Institute or Fox News or News Corp or NatCon or any of the above, if you're taking money from them or from those subsidiaries, you cannot talk about those people. You cannot talk about Israel. You cannot go against them and talk about the conspiracy theories like that. Bill Ackman used the plagiarism scandal to take down Claudine Gay because we can't have free speech on an American university because it might convince Americans to stop sending guns to Israel to blow up Iran and Hamas. Case in point. Those are the billionaires. Those are the ones he can't talk about. Paul Singer, Peter Thiel, Rupert Murdoch, George and Alex Soros, Tom Klingenstein, Miriam and Sheldon Adelson, Bill Ackman, and there's even more still. But the those are just the ones we cover tonight, and those are all the intellectuals that they touch. Michael Anton, who wrote Flight 93, and Harry Joffe's mentor, and Leo Strauss, his mentor, and Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin and Rene Girard, who they take their philosophy from, which has a convenient interpretation for Jews, and Chris Ruffo and Sohrab Amari and Jeremy Kaufmanist and I am 7076 and everybody affiliated with Claremont, which is American Mind, they're all in on the take. It is straight up a foreign influence operation. And all we had to do was start to pull at the thread. That's all we had to do. Chris Burnett, who was the protege, who was working for them in the belly of the beast, all he had to do was start to pull on the thread, and the whole thing unraveled. The whole thing came undone. And we found out, wait a second. Soros and Klingenstein and Teal and Singer are all backing the same people? Even though they're against or for authoritarianism, they all agree open society, individualism, no antisemitism, no true free speech, gatekeepers on the right and left, no criticism of Israel. And they wanna make Vance the successor to Trump to steer the base back into neoconservatism, back into their color blind, Jewish blind meritocracy. We're not gonna notice that it's all Jews running everything.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

A clip of Nick delving even further into the influence operation. https://t.co/I7DDT1j8CS

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

Nick Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) explains how the right is under an occupation and refers to the connections between Paul Singer, Thiel, BAP, Michael Anton, Harry Jaffa, Leo Strauss, and Chris Rufo. “Paul Singer is a Jewish pro-Israel billionaire and donates to Claremont Institute which provides funding for American Mind, IM 1776, and publishes the Claremont Review of Books, which reviewed Bronze Age Mindset. Claremont Institute has also provided figures into the National Security apparatus in the Trump admin, like Michael Anton. Michael Anton was put inside the Trump Administration by his close ally, Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel is the other major donor behind Claremont. Half of his net worth is accounted for by Palantir, a national security company that he co-founded with Alex Karp 20 years ago. Alex Karp said in interviews, that the Christian right taking power is his biggest fear After October 7th, he flew Palantir’s entire board to Israel. They reserved 200 spots at the company for Jewish applicants. Palantir’s only client for its first seven years in existence was the CIA. Now Palantir’s clients include the NSA, the DOD, the FBI, ICE, as well as intelligence agencies around the world.” “Michael Anton was a protégé of Harry Jaffa who founded the Claremont Institute. Harry Jaffa was a Jew and a student of Leo Strauss. Harry Jaffa said that Leo Strauss’s mission in life was to protect the West, and first and foremost, the West is supposed to be a safe place for the Jews. Leo Strauss was German-born Jewish. He was mentored by Ze’ev Jabotinsky, who was a pro-Israel terrorist inside of Israel. Jabotinsky was one of the progenitors of the revisionist Zionist school of thought, which said that Israel should take over the entire area in the Mandate of Palestine, what we would call Greater Israel. Jabotinsky was aligned with the other early Zionist militants that became the Likud party.” “So Jabotinsky, who was one of the founders of the state of Israel through terrorism and deception, made Leo Strauss a Zionist. Leo Strauss comes to America and pushes nationalism for Israel but not for America. Jabotinsky pushes this secular rational humanism. Strauss mentors Jaffa. Jaffa founds Claremont. Jaffa mentors Michael Anton. Peter Thiel gives funding to Claremont with the money he earns from Palantir, which is a Mossad-occupied intelligence contractor for the government. Peter Thiel donates to the Trump campaign, which puts him on the transition team so he can choose some of the hires in the Trump Administration. Peter Thiel gets his friend Michael Anton in Trump’s National Security Council, and the National Security Council provides the options for the White House about how to conduct their foreign policy in the Middle East. Paul Singer is another funder of Claremont, just like he funds the Manhattan Institute. Ilya Shapiro, Leor Sapir, Israelis that also work for Jewish think tanks, and their mission statement is to promote Israeli-American security.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Paul Singer and Peter Thiel are major donors to the Claremont Institute, which has influenced the Trump administration's national security apparatus. Michael Anton, a key figure in this network, was appointed to the National Security Council with Thiel's support. Thiel co-founded Palantir, a national security firm closely tied to U.S. intelligence agencies, and has expressed concerns about the Christian right's influence. The Claremont Institute's origins trace back to Harry Jaffa, a student of Leo Strauss, who advocated for a pro-Israel agenda. This network raises questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the promotion of Israeli interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know what's really interesting about Paul Singer? Paul Singer also donates to Claremont, Claremont Institute. Claremont Institute provides funding for American Mind, I am 1776. It publishes a Claremont review of books, which reviewed bronze age mindset, which is bronze age pervert's book. Claremont Institute has also provided some of the major figures that went into the national security apparatus in the Trump administration, notably like Michael Anton. Michael Anton was in the National Security Council under Trump. He wrote an article for Clairemont called the Flight 93 election where he urged people to vote for Trump. Michael Anton was put inside the Trump administration by his close ally, Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel is the other major donor behind Claremont. Claremont has 2 big donors, Paul Singer and Peter Thiel. Paul Singer is a Jewish pro Israel billionaire. Peter Thiel is a little more complicated. Peter Thiel, half of his net worth is accounted for by Palantir, a national security company that he cofounded with Alex Karp 20 years ago. Alex Karp is Jewish, pro Israel. Like I've said before, his biggest fear that he he said in interviews is that the Christian right will take power and kill him for being Jewish. After October 7th, he flew Palantir's entire board to Israel. They reserved 200 spots at the company for Jewish applicants infiltrated from head to toe by Israel. Palantir's only client for its first 7 years in existence was the CIA. Now Palantir's clients include the NSA, the DOD, the FBI, ICE, as well as intelligence agencies around the world. Half of Peter Thiel's net worth is tied up in Palantir, the company that he founded. So Peter Thiel and Singer are the 2 big donors for Claremont. Claremont put Michael Anton with Peter Thiel into Trump's National Security Council. Michael Anton was a protege of Harry Jaffa. Harry Jaffa founded the Claremont Institute. Harry Jaffa was a Jew. Harry Jaffa was a student of Leo Strauss. Harry Jaffa said that Leo Strauss' mission in life was to protect the West. And 1st and foremost, the West is supposed to be a safe place for the Jews. Leo Strauss was German born Jewish. He was mentored by Ziv Jabotinsky who was a pro Israel terrorist inside of Israel. Jabotinsky was one of the progenitors of the revisionist Zionist school of thought, which said that Israel should take over the entire area in the mandate of Palestine, what we would call greater Israel. And Jabotinsky was aligned with the other early Zionist militants that became the Lykud party, of which BB Netanyahu is a part of today, and which supported all the other neocons in the American conservative intelligentsia. So Jabotinsky, who was one of the founders of the state of Israel through terrorism and deception, made Leo Strauss a Zionist. Leo Strauss comes to America and pushes nationalism for Israel, but not for America. Jabotinsky pushes this, secular rational humanism. Strauss mentors Jaffa. Jaffa founds Clermont. Jaffa mentors Michael Anton. Peter Thiel gives funding to Claremont with the money he earned from Palantir, which is Mossad occupied and intelligence contractor for the government. Peter Thiel donates to the Trump campaign, which puts him on the transition team so he can choose some of the hires in the Trump administration. Peter Thiel gets his friend, Michael Anton, in Trump's National Security Council. And the National Security Council provides the options for the White House about how to conduct their foreign policy in the Middle East. And Paul Singer is another funder of Clermont just like he funds Manhattan Institute. And who works at the Manhattan Institute? Ilya Shapiro, Leo Sapor, Israelis that also work for Jewish think tanks and their mission statement is to pro it to promote Israeli American security competition. You don't think all of that isn't a big conflict of interest? This is an

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

A clip of Nick exposing how Rufo purposely didn’t mention the Israeli operatives working at the Manhattan Institute.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

Nick Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) discusses Chris Rufo (@realchrisrufo) at the Manhattan Policy Institute, purposefully omitting the Israeli operatives working for him. “The Manhattan Institute is one of the major think tanks on the right, and Chris Rufo has been one of the major public intellectuals on the right over the past two or three years. Chris Rufo has a mixed marriage. Chris Rufo ran for city council as a Democrat, supporting gay rights, trans rights. So he’s a liberal in a mixed marriage, which is a pretty cosmopolitan liberal phenomenon. Now he’s omitting the involvement of these Israelis working under him as he defends them from their conflict of interest in supporting Israel.” “So he defends Leor Sapir, who is at the Manhattan Institute. We’ll skip over the part where he was born in Israel, served in the Israeli military, studied in Israel. Let’s just skip to the part where he came to America to infiltrate. Ilya Shapiro, in addition to working for the Manhattan Institute, also works for the Jewish Policy Center, where he’s a writer. Let’s read the mission statement of the Jewish Policy Center: it says the Jewish Policy Center provides timely perspectives and analysis of foreign and domestic policies by leading scholars, academics, and commentators. The JPC passionately supports a strong American defense capability, U.S.-Israel security cooperation, and missile defense. We support Israel in its quest for legitimacy and security.” “Immigrant Jew who was born in the Soviet Union and came to America. He also writes articles for the JPC and the Manhattan Institute about how anti-Semites should be banned from universities and how universities should disband pro-Palestine groups. This is your Manhattan Institute: a progressive liberal in a mixed marriage omitting key details about two of their Jewish contributors, one of whom was born in Israel, served in the IDF, and studied at a Jewish university; another of whom was born outside of America in the Soviet Union and works for another think tank explicitly promoting Israel’s interests. You’re born in the Soviet Union or born in Israel and then come here to support Israel’s national security interests at a think tank funded by Paul Singer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Manhattan Institute, a prominent conservative think tank, features Chris Ruffo, who has a mixed marriage and previously ran as a Democrat supporting LGBTQ rights. This raises questions about the true conservatism of its leadership. Ruffo defends Lior Sapper, an Israeli-born individual with military service, while dismissing concerns about conflicts of interest regarding their support for Israel. Ilya Shapiro, another contributor, works for both the Manhattan Institute and the Jewish Policy Center, which advocates for U.S.-Israel relations. Critics suggest that their backgrounds and affiliations compromise their objectivity, highlighting a disconnect between their narratives and traditional conservative values. The portrayal of these figures as typical Americans is questioned, given their strong ties to Israel and liberal stances.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't trust these people at like, this is what's going on. And Manhattan Institute is one of the major think tanks on the right. And Chris Ruffo has been one of the major public intellectuals on the right over the past 2 or 3 years. Did you know, by the way, that Chris Ruffo has a mixed marriage just like JD Vance? Isn't that a bit strange? I I'll ask this again. What kind of person gets into a mixed marriage? Because I know that's not how I was raised. I know that most people are a little bit traditional when it comes to those things. JD Vance, Chris Ruffo, all these guys are in mixed marriages. Did you know that Chris Ruffo ran ran for city council as a democrat supporting gay rights, trans, all that kind of stuff? So he's a liberal in a mixed marriage, which is a pretty that's a pretty cosmopolitan liberal phenomenon. I I don't think that's a deeply conservative value. Working in a think tank and now he's omitting the involvement of these, Israelis working under him as he defends them from their conflict of interest in supporting Israel. Are these people like us? It's like I said earlier. Who is really running these conservative institutions? Who's running the GOP? Who's running the GOP? Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell. Who's running the g and look at their marriages. Look at their relations. And where do they get their money? And look at Fox News, where do they get their money? And who are they allied with? And it goes on and on and on like this. But if you start to notice and you begin to scrutinize, suddenly you're quarrelsome, disagreeable, conspiracy theorist, hate monger, liar. But I digress. So he defends Lior Sapper, who is at Manhattan Institute. No. No. He's not an Israeli spy. We'll skip over the part where he was born in Israel, served in the Israeli military, studied in Israel. Let's just skip to the part where he came to America to infiltrate. He goes on. He writes, Ilya Shapiro, the other academic Burnett attacked, took on academic orthodoxies, endured a smear campaign by Georgetown Law School, and has gone on to do essential work on university reform. Both men have advanced good policy in America, and the insinuation that their work is compromised by their ancestry or support for Israel is totally out of bounds. Aria Shapiro or, I'm sorry, Ilya Shapiro. What's Ilya Shapiro? It's a Jewish name. Spoiler alert. We could skip over that part. Did you know that Ilya Shapiro, in addition to working for the Manhattan Institute, also works for the Jewish Policy Center where he's a writer? Let's read the mission statement of the Jewish Policy Center. It says the Jewish Policy Center provides timely perspectives and analysis of foreign and domestic policies by leading scholars, academics, and commentators. The JPC passionately supports a strong American defense capability, US Israel security cooperation, and missile defense. We support Israel in its quest for legitimacy and security. Okay? And this is a immigrant Jew who was born in the Soviet Union and came to America. He also writes articles for JPC and Manhattan Institute about how anti semites should be banned from universities and universities should disband pro Palestine groups. I'm sure he's not biased though. So this is your Manhattan Institute, a progressive liberal in a mixed marriage, omitting key details about 2 of their Jewish contributors. One of whom was born in Israel, served in the IDF, studied at a Jewish university. Another of whom was born outside of America in the Soviet Union and works for another think tank explicitly promoting Israel's interests. Sounds just like you and me. Right? It's a regular American dream. Regular American story where you're born in the Soviet Union or born in Israel and then come here to support Israel's national security interests at a think tank funded by Paul Singer.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

My thread diving into the hypocrisy of Vance and his pro-Israel spin on America First.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

🚨⚠️𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐉.𝐃. 𝐕𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞‼️ JD Vance is our new Vice President and he’s awful. 🔥(𝑨 𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅):🧵 https://t.co/JUpttjUFfB

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

Nick breaks down an interesting connection between Bronze Age Pervert and Bari Weiss.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

Nick Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) explains the connection between the Kristols, Hazony, Thiel, Costin Alamariu, Bari Weiss, and Bret Stephens and how Jews became more right-wing after Oct. 7th. “After October 7th, Claudine Gay was under attack in the media, in Congress, by the alumni network, by various officials, and billionaires in New York City. Ultimately, she was forced to step down and resign, and she was replaced by a Jew named Alan Garber. It was forced by a billionaire, a Harvard alumnus named Bill Ackman, a Zionist Jew who said that after October 7th, he had an epiphany and suddenly became right-wing. Ackman was funding digital billboard trucks to drive around the Harvard campus, doxing a group of left-wing students that wrote a letter in support of Hamas after October 7th. Jews worldwide were made more right-wing after October 7th, and because they run America, America has become more right-wing.” “Bret Stephens was a mentor to Bari Weiss, who is a Jewish Israeli spy. Bari Weiss studied at Columbia University. After she graduated in the mid-2000s, she moved to Israel, where she worked with the IDF and had an internship with Yoram Hazony at his Shalem Center. Hazony now runs NatCon, which is where JD Vance, Ron DeSantis, Josh Hawley, and Peter Thiel speak every year. Yoram Hazony wrote The Virtue of Nationalism, where he argued that Syria is not a real country, just like the Clean Break memo and Oded Yinon’s plan from the ‘80s.” “Hazony got his start at Princeton when Irving Kristol, the godfather of neoconservatism, funded the Princeton Tory, the conservative campus publication that Hazony founded there. Irving Kristol also funded the Stanford Review, which was founded by Peter Thiel at Stanford around the same time. Irving Kristol’s son, Bill Kristol at The Weekly Standard, was the biggest proponent of the Iraq War. They’re like the two big neoconservatives of the first and second generations.” “When Bari Weiss was at Columbia University, she rubbed shoulders with and probably worked with Dr. Costin Alamariu on the David Project, which is a pro-Israel project on campus. They both went to Columbia at the same time. They both wrote articles for the Columbia Spectator in defense of Columbia Unbecoming, a report that documented allegations of anti-Israel bias at Columbia. They were both involved in pro-Israel activism on their campus at the exact same time.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Claudine Gay became Harvard's first Black female president amid the DEI movement following George Floyd's death. However, after the events of October 7, she faced significant backlash from various groups, leading to her resignation. Billionaire Bill Ackman, a Harvard alumnus, criticized DEI policies and pushed for her removal, claiming a shift in his political views. This incident reflects a broader trend of increased right-wing sentiment among Jews and institutions in America post-October 7, particularly against DEI, which they see as conflicting with their interests. An op-ed by Bret Stephens in the New York Times echoes these sentiments, highlighting a network of influential figures in media and politics who shape narratives and policies in America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the universities. Claudine Gay was the 1st black female president of Harvard. She became the 1st black female president of Harvard in the past couple years in the aftermath of George Floyd's death. So she, in academia, was the apogee of the Floyd era DEI policies. She was anointed and became the president of the most prestigious academic institution in America because she was a black woman in the era of George Floyd and DEI. After October 7th, what happened? She was under attack on all fronts, in the media, in congress, by the alumni network, by various officials and billionaires in New York City. Ultimately, she was forced to step down and resign, and she was replaced by a Jew named Alan Garber. And it was forced by a billionaire, a Harvard alumni named Bill Ackman, a Zionist Jew, who said that after October 7th, he had an epiphany and suddenly became right wing. And although he was a lifelong Democrat, after October 7th, because of October 7th, he became a Republican and penned an open letter talking about how DEI was out of control at Harvard, and they had to fire their new president. It also happens to be the case that Bill Ackman was funding digital billboard trucks to drive around the Harvard campus, doxing a group of left wing students that wrote a letter in support of Hamas after October 7th. Maybe a conflict of interest. That's just a microcosm. So so so many other examples that follow the same pattern. Israel was made more right wing by October 7th. Jews worldwide were made more right wing after October 7th. And because they run America, America has become more right wing. In so far as DEI is a leftist innovation, and in so far as the left supports or has supported the liberationist cause of Palestine, now the Jewish run institutions are decidedly against the left and DEI. I'll also add, DEI has had a direct effect on Jewish enrollment in elite institutions like Harvard and Yale and other schools. When they say DEI, it doesn't really square that 25% of the students at some of these Ivy League schools are Jews. They gotta make room for blacks and Hispanics and the underclass. And so that's another reason why they push back against DEI. You might think they're being based. You might think they're being right wing like us. They're doing it for another reason. And with all that being said, today, that's a very, very long introduction. Today, there was an op ed published in the New York Times by their columnist, Bret Stephens, and he basically argues exactly that. Bret Stephens, you might have heard of him. Bret Stephens used to write for the Jerusalem Post, then he wrote for the Wall Street Journal. Now he writes for the New York Times. He was a mentor to Bari Weiss, who is a Jewish Israeli spy. Bari Weiss studied at Columbia University. After she graduated in the mid 2000, she moved to Israel where she worked with the IDF and had an internship with Yoram Hazony at his Shalem Center. And for those that don't know, Yoram Hazony now runs National Conservatism Conference, NATCON, which is where JD Vance and Ron DeSantis and Josh Hawley and Peter Thiel speak every year. Yara Mazzoni wrote virtue of nationalism where he argued that Syria is not a real country just like the Clean Break memo and Oded Yenon's plan for the eighties. Yaurav Mazzoni got his start at Princeton when Irving Kristol, the godfather of neoconservatism, funded the Princeton Tory, the conservative campus publication that has only founded there. And Irving Kristol also funded the Stanford Review, which was founded by Peter Thiel at Stanford around the same time. Irving Kristol's son, Bill Kristol, at Weekly Standard was the biggest proponent of the Iraq war. They're like the 2 big neoconservatives of the 1st and second generation. This is a milieu that we're talking about, the milieu that we're swimming in. And by the way, I wanna throw in one other little connection there if you can write all that down. When Bari Weiss was at Columbia University, do you know who she rubbed shoulders with and probably worked with on the David project, which is a pro Israel project on campus? Presumably, she worked with doctor Kostin Alemariu, otherwise known as bronze age pervert, because he and she went to Colombia at the same time. They both wrote articles for the Columbia spectator in defense of Columbia unbecoming, and they were both involved in pro Israel activism on their campus at the exact same time. But I'm sure that's just a big coincidence. It's always just a big coincidence, isn't it? And probably doesn't deserve any scrutiny. But anyway so I'm gonna read this article from Bret Stephens in the New York Times. I just wanted to explain the pedigree a little bit so you guys know there is a very real network in America. They run our media. They run our government. They direct all the money, and they are not loyal to the United States. And we're gonna read this article. And now that you know some of the pedigree, I want you to hear how it sounds, and I want you to hear from the horse's mouth themselves. I'm not gonna say it. I'll have they I'll have them say it. I'll have Brett Stevens say it.

@OnlyMobKing - 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

Graphic summarizing the entire operation https://t.co/5s407rAZcN

OnlyMobKing
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 4:26 AM
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 8:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw the clearest video of Thomas Matthew Crooks shooting at former President Trump. The footage shows him firing before getting shot himself, and in the background, a woman can be heard yelling, "Crooks, what are you doing?! Get over here!" It's shocking.

@OnlyMobKing - Only Mob King 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: CLEAREST VIDEO OF THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS SHOOTING AT PRESIDENT TRUMP‼️ A newly obtained video from TMZ shows the shooter, identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, firing at former President Donald Trump before being shot. In the background, a woman is heard yelling, "Crooks, what are you doing?! Get over here!" Who was the woman yelling Thomas Matthew Crooks’ last name before he attempted to assassinate Trump?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses extreme anger and frustration. They believe Donald Trump is needed to address the current situation. The speaker mentions "secret charges" and reacts strongly to them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Oh my god. Fuckin' all the fucking shit. Dude, that's exactly why we need fucking Trump here. I'm so pissed. Fuckin' shit. Oh, fucking secret charges don't fuck around. Holy shit.
OnlyMobKing
Posted - June 4, 2024 at 6:35 PM
Saved - June 5, 2024 at 11:51 AM

@OnlyMobKing - Only Mob King 🇺🇸

@kylenabecker I’ll let the man himself answer ⬇️ https://t.co/mqdkuWCXvt

Video Transcript AI Summary
An unending flow of immigration will make people like me, of European descent, a minority in the US. In the future, less than half of the population will be white European. This change is not negative, but rather a part of our evolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our
View Full Interactive Feed