TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @OwenGregorian

Saved - February 22, 2026 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on Donut Lab’s claim of a 400 Wh/kg solid-state battery with 100,000 cycles and a 5-minute charge, already in production and shipping to Verge motorcycles this quarter. Skeptical, I probe the chemistry, hinting at Nordic Nano’s amorphous TiO2 approach and a nanofluid printing process. If true, this could reset energy and transport; if not, credibility risks for Marko and Donut Lab. Independent tests will decide soon.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

This battery is about to change the world in 3 months, or make this guy a fool | Fred Lambert, Hacker News Donut Lab lit the EV and energy storage industry on fire last week with its announcement of a 400 Wh/kg solid-state battery cell that can last for 100 years. At face value, if true, we are looking at the single most disruptive announcement in the history of the electric vehicle industry and energy storage as a whole. We aren’t just talking about a better motorcycle battery. If the claims of a 5-minute charge, 100,000-cycle life, and ~400 Wh/kg energy density are accurate and scalable, as Donut Lab claims, this is the holy grail of energy storage. Battery breakthrough announcements generally don’t catch fire like this, but Donut Lab’s did because it said that the cell was already in production and will be in a production vehicle, Verge’s electric motorcycle, this quarter. It gave credibility to the claim, pushing everyone to report on it. Now, we have interviewed Donut Lab’s CEO and investigated the technology. At this point, it looks like either this battery changes the world within the next 3 months, or it will make the CEO look like a fool. In this article, we discuss the impact of the battery, whether real or not, as well as clues about the secret sauce behind its chemistry. The Holy Grail of Energy Storage Consider the implications. A battery that lasts 100,000 cycles is effectively immortal in human terms. You could charge it every single day for 270 years, and it would still be working. It means the battery outlives the vehicle, not just once, but ten times over. It changes the economics of transportation entirely: you buy the battery once, and you swap it into your next five cars. The power density required for a 5-minute charge and the 400 Wh/kg of energy density opens the door to commercial electric aviation, a sector currently strangled by the weight and slow charging speeds of lithium-ion. It solves the grid storage problem by offering a medium that doesn’t degrade, meaning utility companies could amortize the cost over a century rather than a decade. If this is real, the internal combustion engine didn’t just die today; it was buried 100 feet deep, and every other battery is not far behind. But, and this is a massive “but”, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and Donut Lab has yet to release that proof. And that brings us to the man making them. The Man Betting His Reputation I spoke with Marko Lehtimäki, the CEO of Donut Lab and Chairman of Verge Motorcycles. My goal was simple: ask him about the chemistry behind his battery and, if that doesn’t work, look him in the eye and figure out if he’s selling vaporware or if he’s sitting on the breakthrough of the century. Marko isn’t a random guy shouting about a battery breakthrough that will change the world. He is a legit entrepreneur. A computer scientist who built a no-coding app builder years before “vibe coding” was even a thing and sold it to SAP. After the successful exit, he became an investor and serial entrepreneur with his biggest, or most well-known, company being Verge Motorcycles, which has real products on the road. By announcing that this “miracle battery” is already in production and will be shipping in customer vehicles within 10 weeks, he is betting his entire personal reputation on this technology. If he misses this timeline or if the specs are fake, Donut Labs and Verge Motorcycles might not survive the credibility loss. He has a lot to lose here. In my article about the battery announcement last week, I noted that Marko’s presentation was incredible. He basically described a perfect battery: record energy density, incredible charge rate, unprecedented longevity, no rare metals, a cost lower than traditional Li-ion cells, and in scalable production right now. Sounds too good to be true? The only thing he didn’t share was details about the chemistry, beyond saying it doesn’t use lithium or other rare metals. What’s the point of protecting the chemistry if the battery is already in production and it will be in a product shipped this quarter? If that’s true, the battery will be reverse-engineered before the snow completely melts. We discussed it with Marko during our interview. His logic is that once the bikes ship, competitors will tear them down and figure it out anyway. But that won’t happen for another 10 weeks or so, and the head start is critical for a technology this disruptive. In the meantime, Donut Lab’s goal with the announcement was to get the attention of OEMs and ship them battery packs for validation. Marko said: We are right now shipping demo packs to OEMs under NDAs and under tight disclosures so that they can test that all of that is true, which serves our business very well [better than disclosing the chemistry]. But these programs with OEMs are likely to take a long time before they become public. Shorter term, there’s Verge Motorcycles shipping bikes with the battery by the end of the quarter. Before that, Marko also said that we should soon see third-party testing of those cells: We rather right now ship it to authorized research and science center that tests everything without opening it and telling everybody what’s in there. In short, we should have a good idea whether the claims are true or not in just a few weeks no matter what. What does Marko, or Donut Lab, have to gain by lying about this? I also discussed this with Marko and the only thing I could come up with is if he happens to be raising capital right now, but he shut that down: There are a million investors chasing us right now, but we are literally not talking to anybody. We tell investors that we can discuss terms after we have done all our disclosures. Marko insisted that Donut Lab is not taking any investment until they have proven their cells work. In short, it’s hard to find an upside for Donut Lab in making this announcement if the claims are not true. It doesn’t mean that they are, but it makes you think. The Investigation: What Is the “Donut Battery”? So, what is the secret sauce? Marko wouldn’t say, but after digging into public records, supply chains, and research papers, I believe we have a pretty good idea. Let me preface this by saying that I’m not a chemist or physicist, but I’ve been a journalist covering electric vehicles for more than a decade, and I’m pretty good at connecting the dots, and in this case, I’ve had the help of a couple of great sources, too. I’m not saying that this is the Donut Lab battery, but since they are not sharing much, we have to speculate, and all evidence points to a Finnish nanotechnology startup called Nordic Nano and its Chief Scientist, Dr. Bela Bhuskute. Donut Lab invested in Nordic Nano in October 2025, just months before this announcement. At the time of writing this, the press release has fewer than 200 views. The announcement went under the radar, and while Marko said that Nordic Nano is more of a “solar company” during our interview, the announcement mentions both solar and energy storage. Dr. Bhuskute’s research at Tampere University focuses on amorphous Titanium Dioxide nanostructures, which could benefit many different technologies, including batteries. It fits the “miracle” specs perfectly: - 100,000 Cycles: Traditional solid-state batteries are crystalline (like a brick wall) and crack when ions rush in. Dr. Bhuskute’s amorphous Titanium Dioxide is disordered (like a sponge) and “breathes,” allowing it to expand and contract without breaking. - 5-Minute Charge: This chemistry stores energy via “pseudocapacitance,” which is basically like Velcro. Ions stick to the surface almost instantly rather than having to burrow deep inside the material. - The Manufacturing: Nordic Nano uses a “nanofluid” printing process for its solar product using the technology. This aligns with Donut Lab’s description of a “clay-like” material that enables an easier manufacturing process. Some call this “battery printing”, which could explain Donut Lab’s ability to bring this to production in record time. When I asked Marko for the volumetric energy density (Wh/L), he claimed he “couldn’t remember”. Volumetric energy density is one of the few specs that Donut Lab hasn’t released. This battery is lighter than lithium-ion, but it could be bigger due to the amorphous nature of the titanium dioxide. However, the CEO claimed it has a higher volumetric density than traditional Li-ion batteries, without providing a specific number. If that’s true, not only could electric vehicles and energy storage switch to this new chemistry, but even personal electronics, such as smartphones. In 2025, Nordic Nano has been making moves, including securing a former large retail location in Imatra, Finland, near the Russian border: It could be where the company has set up production. Following investment from the Finnish government, Nordic Nano had to elaborate a bit on its products and confirmed that it is working on “solar energy systems and energy storage solutions”: The company’s range of products includes two product families: solar energy systems and energy storage solutions: The ultra-thin and flexible solar film collects twice the amount of energy compared to traditional silicon-based solar panels. Solid-state salt batteries are manufactured by printing from nanofluid, which enables the efficient use of space and the production of batteries in varying shapes. Furthermore, the company confirmed that it is using a “screenprinting” manufacturing method. This is not new. Other companies have produced battery cells with this technology with varying degrees of success. It appears that the bet is that the amorphous rather than crystalized titanium dioxide nanostructure could be more easily adapted and scaled with this manufacturing technology. Electrek’s Take I’m naturally skeptical, and this screams “too good to be true”, but I can’t find anything that categorically rejects the claims. I get battery breakthrough announcements in my inbox every week, and most of the time they never amount to anything. If I decide to spend some time researching them and talking to experts, I generally quickly hit a problem or two that make them commercially unviable. This announcement is different. We can’t really investigate the actual breakthrough; we can only speculate about it, since it is guarded. Marko’s logic for guarding the chemistry is sound, and the incentives to lie about what they have aren’t clear if he is not currently raising money. Then, because they claim this is already in production and will be in a deliverable product within weeks, we will know whether the claims are true in short order, and their reputations, especially Marko’s, are on the line. During my interview, Marko didn’t seem too worried about it. It doesn’t sound like someone who needs to quickly figure out how to deliver this, but rather someone who has a couple of aces in their hand and is looking to maximize them. It’s also strange that this innovation and then production quickly comes from a relatively small company. I thought researching Donut Lab would make me more skeptical about the claims, but it’s the contrary. It confirms that their technology stems from years of research, backed by university and government funding for its commercialization. Could it be that this critical research went under the radar and a small electric motorcycle startup in need of a significant bump in energy density stumbled upon it? Then, a savvy entrepreneur quickly found a way to optimize the impact of this potentially groundbreaking tech by spinning out a startup from the motorcycle company to market the battery to a broader market. Maybe? This could be real, or it could be hype. Again, I’m still skeptical, but I can’t point to anything specific that would disprove any claim made about this miracle battery. Again, if this is true, we are talking about a complete reset of the entire energy and transportation sectors. Donut Lab would become one of the biggest companies in the world. A Nobel Prize would be coming to Dr. Bhuskute and her colleagues in the near future. If it’s not, Marko and Donut Lab’s reputation would be destroyed. There might also be a middle conclusion where the battery is nearly as good as they claim, but when you ramp up production, other problems arise, such as scrap, which has been the undoing of another company that recently tried screenprinting batteries. Who knows? But it sounds like we should find out soon. Within weeks, we should get independent verifications of the specs. Then the bikes get delivered within months. You can fake a presentation, but there are things you can’t fake. https://electrek.co/2026/01/14/batter-about-change-world-or-make-this-guy-fool/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marco, Co Founder and CEO of Donut Lab, announces that Donut Lab is not just improving batteries but changing the baseline of electric mobility with a solid state battery that reshapes economics and the user experience. He recalls that Donut Motors were introduced at CES and are now used in everyday vehicles, with more than 100 OEMs globally upgrading their product roadmaps. He states that the battery is the next step to make combustion irrelevant. A short film shows early partners working with Donut Motors, including Watt EV platform technology with Donut Lab end wheel technology, the AR5 using a 12-inch donut motor with a hollow core for efficient load path, and the Speedster with four 17-inch Donut Lab motors delivering lightweight, dense power and expanded architectural possibilities. Marco emphasizes that the industry’s decade-long promise of solid state batteries has been hampered by compromises. He asserts that there are no production vehicles with solid state batteries to date and argues that every solid state battery claimed to be coming soon carries trade-offs. Donut Lab asks, “Can we build an all solid state battery pack with no compromises that can actually go into production of vehicles?” He answers that Donut Lab is presenting a no compromise all solid state battery—not hybrid or semi solid, but all solid state—engineered as a complete battery system, pack electronics, thermal and safety, built to scale. He claims it is “the world's only solid state battery pack that combines all of the features that the industry has been forced to trade against each other: Ultra high energy density, the fastest charging time, practically unlimited cycles, extreme safety and lower price than lithium ion,” and that it is “for every use case where batteries are used,” including two wheelers, cars, drones, robotics, and grid storage. He adds the battery is 100% green, made from materials found everywhere, not rare or geopolitically constrained. Spencer from Verge describes Verge TS Pro as the world’s first production vehicle powered by a solid state battery from DonutLab, delivering a 35-minute charge time now under ten minutes, and a real world range of 350 kilometers, with a long range variant delivering up to 600 kilometers. He notes the TS Pro’s motor is 50% lighter with 1,000 Newton meters, plus a new double display dashboard. Verge upgrades all TS Pros to the new generation with solid state batteries. Marco highlights energy density at 400 watt hours per kilogram, enabling dramatically more range at the same weight or the same range with a lighter pack. He states the pack charges zero to full in as low as five minutes and is designed for 100,000 cycles. The battery retains over 99% capacity at minus 30 degrees Celsius and also above 100 degrees Celsius. He contrasts this with lithium ion’s safety risks, noting Donut Battery is designed so that when damaged it won’t ignite. The battery is priced to be lower than lithium ion from day one and is designed as a platform technology for two wheelers, passenger vehicles, fleets, drones, robotics, marine, and stationary storage. Donut Lab announces integration with Watt Electric on a lightweight electric skateboard platform that includes Donut Motors and Donut Battery, ready for OEMs to adopt today. Cova Power trailers, electrified through a joint venture with Aholda Group, will also feature the Donut solid state battery, improving diesel savings and energy costs in ground transportation. Finally, Donut Lab presents the Donut platform—integrating motor, software, battery, and control units—aimed at helping OEMs redefine vehicle categories, with the Donut Battery complete as the pivotal element for combustion to become irrelevant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, I'm Marco, Co Founder and CEO of Donut Lab. At Donut Lab, we wake up every day with one obsession: make electric vehicles so good that combustion becomes irrelevant. Not just greener or almost as good, but better in every way. Last year at CES, we introduced donut motors, and they weren't just a concept or promise. They were a breakthrough in physics and economics. More torque and power per kilogram but also more torque and power per dollar. A lot of people didn't believe it but today those motors are real. They are used in everyday vehicles from motorcycles to trucks and more than 100 OEMs globally are currently in the process of upgrading their product roadmaps. And that brought us to the next problem, because even with a revolutionary motor, the entire EV experience is still limited by one component: the battery. Range, charge time, cost, weight and lifetime, all limitations. So today, we are doing what we did with the motor. We are changing the baseline. We are announcing a new battery that reshapes the economics and the experience of electric mobility forever. It's solid state and it's going to transform the industry. And once you see what it enables, combustion doesn't just look outdated, it looks unnecessary. Before we show you the battery, we want to show you something else. What happened after we revealed Donut Motors in 2025? Let's watch a short film with some of our early partners building exciting products with Donut Motors. Speaker 1: The Watt EV platform technology, coupled with the Donut Lab end wheel technology, opens up so many possibilities to do things quickly with technical benefits that we haven't previously been able to exploit. It's a really exciting future working together with DonutLab. Speaker 2: For our next model, the AR5, we're going to use the DonutLab 12 inches donut motor. As well as being light in weight, it has a hollow core and that allows us to have the load path going straight through the centre of the motor. This is very efficient structurally and simplifies our design. Speaker 3: The Speedster has four seventeen inch Donut Lab motors, one in each corner. They're super lightweight, very dense in power. It creates extra space for us to do interesting things with the architecture. So having that extra power, having those lightweight motors in the wheel, and having that ability to really tune the dynamics in a way that people haven't experienced before is gonna be really interesting, and we're excited to have people try the car. Speaker 0: So today, we are doing what we did with the motor. We are changing the baseline of battery. For the past decade, the industry has been promising the same thing: solid state battery. You've seen the headlines and you've seen the prototypes. You've heard next year for as long as you can remember. In theory, solid state fixes the biggest limitations of lithium ion, energy density, charging speed, lifetime and safety. But here's the reality. Until today, there are no vehicles in production using solid state batteries, not one, not at scale and not shipping to customers. And it's not because people are not trying, it's because every solid state battery that's been coming soon comes with compromises. Some promise high energy density, but they cannot charge fast. Others promise fast charging, but cycle life falls apart. And some promise to improve safety, but the costs are ridiculous. Some of them can even be built today, but only in limited formats, limited volumes and limited use cases. So you don't get a breakthrough, you get a new trade off and trade offs are exactly what keep EVs from becoming obviously better than combustion. To make combustion irrelevant, electric has to be better in every way that matters. So we ask a different question. Can we build an all solid state battery pack with no compromises that can actually go into production of vehicles? That's the challenge and today we are ready to answer it. Today, Donut Lab is presenting a no compromise all solid state battery. Not hybrid, not semi solid and not solid state ish, but all solid state, engineered as a complete battery system, pack electronics, thermal and safety and built to scale. And it does something no one else has done. It's the world's only solid state battery pack that combines all of the features that the industry has been forced to trade against each other. Ultra high energy density, the fastest charging time, practically unlimited cycles, extreme safety and lower price than lithium ion. And not for one premium car or a niche application, but for every use case where batteries are used, from two wheelers to cars to drones to robotics and to grid storage. And there's one more part because performance alone isn't the full story anymore. The battery is also 100% green, made from materials that are found everywhere, not rare materials and not geopolitically constrained materials, which in today's world is more important than ever before. Now, I know that's a lot to take in because if you followed solid state announcements from the big players, you have already seen the pattern. Amazing specs tied to timelines like 2030 and beyond. And when you compare what's been promised for the next decade, the truth is donut battery surpasses what most of the industry is still planning to deliver years from now. So the obvious question is, are we shipping this in 2029 or 2030? No. These batteries are available today, not just available for OEMs to look at in the lab and not just available to prototype with, but available for real production. In fact, today we are making history because donut battery is the world's first solid state battery in production vehicles shipping to customers. And to tell you more about the first vehicle in the world enabled by a true solid state battery pack, I'd like to welcome Spencer from Verge Speaker 4: Thank you, Marco. At Verge, Verge we do not follow trends. We shape the world of motorcycling by using technology that doesn't just improve the ride, it transforms it. Our mission has always been simple, to create the world's best electric motorcycles. And proof of that is the Verge TS Pro. It delivers more performance and more real world range than any other electric motorcycle on the road today. And in 2025, we didn't just claim that. We proved it by breaking the official Guinness World Record for a longest journey by an electric motorcycle on a single charge. 350 kilometers, real world riding, one charge. Then just a few months ago at EGMA twenty twenty five, we revealed the next generation of the Verge TS Pro. More than 100 improvements, some small, but some truly category defining. Take our new motor, 50% lighter while delivering the same uncompromising level of performance, 1,000 newton meters. A new double display verge dashboard transforming the cockpit experience for all of our riders. Everything sharper, everything smarter, everything more refined. But that wasn't the full story. We deliberately kept one little secret. Well, I wouldn't call it a little secret, more of a history defining one, because as of today, the Verge TS Pro is officially the world's first production vehicle powered by a solid state battery from DonutLab. Let that sink in for a moment. All Verge TS Pro motorcycles will be delivered with a solid state battery pack. A motorcycle that already redefined its category has now taken the biggest leap forward for electric mobility and what it's been waiting for. The world famous thirty five minute charge time is now under ten minutes. Yes, under ten minutes. In fact, we found ourselves designing a slower charging speed so riders can plug in and actually have time to drink a latte and enjoy it instead of downing an espresso and rushing back to their bike. And that 350 kilometer real world range, that proudly stays a staple on the TS Pro. But if 350 kilometers is not enough for you, then we have another announcement to make. A new long range variant delivering up to 600 kilometers of real world range. Yes. That's nearly double the range that broke the world record. I guess we can truly say goodbye to range anxiety. And there's another breakthrough that matters just as much as charging speed and the range. These batteries are designed to last the lifetime of the vehicle. No need to baby the battery. No need to worry about charging too fast, too often, or too full. Run it to zero. Charge it to a 100% every time. Just ride. And for everyone waiting in the queue for a TS Pro, both in The United States and in Europe, we are automatically upgrading your order to the new generation of the TS Pro, the world's first motorcycle produced with a solid state battery. If you do want to upgrade to the long range version, send us an email and our team will get back to you and take care of the rest. This is Virg Motorcycles. Marco, back to you. Speaker 0: Thanks, Spencer. In addition to upgrading VirgTS Pro with donut battery, Virg is also the exclusive channel partner of donut battery technology for the two wheeler industry. This means that global OEMs producing more than 60,000,000 motorcycles every year now have access to this transformative technology as well. So let's go a little deeper into the details of this new technology. Let's start with energy density because it's the foundation. Energy density defines range. It defines weight. With donut battery, we set a new baseline, 400 watt hours per kilogram. And that number matters because it changes the design envelope. It means one of two things. You can build an EV with dramatically more range at the same weight, or you can build the same range vehicle with a much lighter and smaller pack. And when you reduce pack size and weight, everything gets better: efficiency, performance, handling and cost. Now let's talk about the thing every EV customer asks about first: charging. The dream has always been charging that feels like refueling, but until now this has not been possible. With donut battery, it becomes the new normal. This pack charges from zero to full in as low as five minutes. As low as five minutes and still built for longevity, because the real breakthrough is fast charging you can do every single day for years without the battery wearing out. And this is the part that quietly changes everything because lithium ion has a life. Yes, you can manage it, you can protect it, but it ages. Doughnut battery is designed differently. It's designed for 100,000 cycles. Now that's not just better cycle life. That's an entirely different category. And when cycle life stops being the limiter, it transforms the total cost of ownership. It transforms residual value. It transforms fleets, logistics and grid storage economics because the battery is no longer the constraint. Now here's the limitation almost everybody lives with, whether they talk about it or not. Most batteries come with an asterisk. They perform well until temperatures swing. Cold weather steals usable energy and heat brings performance loss and faster degradation. And if you build vehicles for the real world, that matters because the real world is not a lab. It's winter mornings, it's desert highways, it's heavy loads and it's hard duty cycles. So we engineered donut battery to remove that asterisk. And at minus 30 degrees Celsius, donut battery retains over 99% of its capacity. And if you push in the opposite direction, heating the cells beyond 100 degrees Celsius, that's 200 Fahrenheit, the result stays the same, over 99% capacity retention. This is incredible. From deep freeze to extreme heat, the performance of donut batteries stays virtually untouched, delivering consistent power and consistent range across extreme climates and demanding use cases. Now compare that to traditional lithium ion. At 60 to 80 degrees Celsius, the risk of thermal runaway rises dramatically. Cells can become unstable and ignite, which brings us to the next important aspect, safety. Everyone in the industry knows the truth. When things go wrong with lithium ion, they can go very wrong. Doughnut battery, on the other hand, is designed so that when it's damaged, it won't ignite and burst into flames. And that removes one of the biggest risks historically associated with EVs and any large battery systems. For OEMs, this means something very concrete: safer products and lower risk of recalls. And safety isn't just about passing a test. It's about building trust in customers, in regulators, in insurers and in the people who put these batteries into the world at scale. Now the question everybody asks next is, okay, but what does it cost? Because if it's amazing but expensive, it stays niche and niche doesn't make combustion irrelevant. So we made a decision early. This cannot be a luxury technology. It has to be lower priced than lithium ion. Not someday and not as a future promise, but structurally and from day one. Lower cost at the pack level and lower complexity and a path designed for mass adaptation. Because price isn't just affordability, price determines how fast the world transitions. Now, there's another reason this matters, because most battery announcements are designed for one narrow segment, one format, one platform, one application. But the world doesn't run on one segment. Batteries now power everything. So we built Donut Battery to be platform technology, not one off, not just high end automotive or concept vehicles, but everywhere batteries are used. Two wheelers, passenger vehicles, fleets, drones, robotics, marine, and even stationary storage. We heard from Spencer how Virg is bringing donut battery to the two wheeler world. So the next question is obvious. What about automotive? How long until we see donut battery in cars? And the answer is not long, because at DonutLab, we're not building a battery for one vehicle. We are building a battery platform designed to fit into many vehicle programs across many OEMs And to accelerate that, we are already integrating Donut Battery into real automotive architectures with our partners. One of the first is Watt Electric. Together, we've been developing a lightweight electric skateboard platform, a modular foundation that can support a wide range of vehicle types on a shared underlying architecture. We already announced that this new platform uses the latest donut motors and today we are announcing the next step. This platform also comes with donut battery built in. OEMs can now fast track to build vehicles that were not even realistic before today because the biggest constraints have finally now been removed. And the best part is this skateboard platform is available to OEMs today, so if you're building a car that needs to redefine its category, this may be the fastest way to get there. And that's the new vehicle skateboard platform with Donut Motors, Donut OS and the Donut Battery. This is part of a broader rollout. Donut lab technology integrated through multiple partners into multiple vehicle platforms across multiple categories. For example, heavy transport. A few months ago, we announced Cova Power, a joint venture with Aholda Group to bring electrified smart trailers to ground transportation. Cova Power trailers are powered by Donut Labs' compact and lightweight C motor family, and they make it possible to electrify existing trailers in just a few hours. And the impact is massive, up to 54% savings in diesel consumption and up to 40% lower total energy costs. That's a multi trillion dollar savings opportunity globally. Europe has more than 3,000,000 trucks and The U. S. Has another 3,000,000 and Cova Power is uniquely positioned to electrify them affordably and at scale. And yes, you guessed it. Starting today, CovaPower smart trailers are also equipped with the new Donut solid state battery, which brings us to the final piece. Because when you scale batteries from motorcycles to cars to trucks to the entire world, one question matters as much as performance, what is this transition actually built from? So let's talk about materials, because if battery materials are scarce or controlled by a few places, this transition slows down and the world stays stuck with combustion longer. And that's why donut battery is built from globally abundant materials, materials you can source close to where you build and close to where you use. It makes batteries scalable, resilient and it makes it possible to build these batteries in Europe or in The U. S. With materials that are sourced locally, which in today's complex world is a huge benefit. So when you put it all together, this is what today is really about. We are not announcing a battery that's a little better. We are announcing a battery that removes the reasons people keep hesitating. Range stops being the concern. Charging stops being the concern. Degradation stops being the concern and temperature stops being the concern. Safety, cost and the supply chain stop being concerns. And when those concerns disappear, combustion doesn't have an argument left. And that's when the transition becomes inevitable. If you zoom out, you will see what we're really building here at DonutLab, because last year we reinvented the motor. And a few months ago, we reinvented EV development with Donut OS. And today, we reinvented the battery. We don't just make components and software, but we are also reimagining the control units that make it all work as one system: motor control, battery control and real time intelligence built together, validated together and designed to scale. Because the future doesn't need another part. It needs a vertically integrated technology platform that helps reimagine what's possible. So if you're an OEM, a builder, a team with a bold idea, if you want to create vehicles that redefine their categories, we want to build with you: motor, software, battery, control units. You can use these incredible technologies independently, but together they create something much bigger than the sum of the parts. We call it the Donut platform And with this battery announcement, it's finally complete. This is the moment combustion stops competing and starts becoming irrelevant. Thank you for your time, and welcome to what's next.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported that Charlie Kirk was shot during an event at Utah Valley University around noon. This incident occurred as part of his American Comeback Tour, which is set to visit various campuses this fall. Videos from the scene captured the chaos, with attendees fleeing and footage seemingly showing the moment of the shooting.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University event | Hannah Nightingale, The Post Millenial The shooting took place around 12 pm local time. Charlie Kirk has been shot at an event held at Utah Valley University on Wednesday. The Utah Valley University stop was part of Kirk’s American Comeback Tour, which is scheduled to hit numerous campuses across the nation in the fall. Video taken at the scene showed the crowd fleeing the area, while another angle appeared to show the moment Kirk was shot. https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-charlie-kirk-shot-at-utah-valley-university-event

BREAKING UPDATE: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University event, suspect in custody The shooting took place around 12 pm local time. thepostmillennial.com
Saved - June 30, 2025 at 1:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
After Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic nomination for mayor, it's clear that only a small fraction of New Yorkers supported him. With less than 30% of Democrats voting in the primary, only about 5% of the city's population backed Mamdani. This low turnout reflects a disillusioned electorate that felt no viable candidates were available. The political landscape has shifted, leaving a coalition of white hipsters and Muslim immigrants as his base, while many traditional New Yorkers have been priced out and disengaged from the political process. The system now favors radicals, resulting in a troubling one-party dynamic.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Only 5% of New Yorkers Voted for Mamdani | Daniel Greenfield After Zohran Mamdani secured the Democrat nomination for mayor, millions of people around the country are wondering how the city that lived through 9/11 could have done this? The answer is it didn’t. Less than 30% of Democrats voted in the mayoral primary. Of those, supposedly, 43.5% voted for Mamdani. So some 12.9% of New York Democrats voted for Mamdani. 56% of registered voters in the city are Democrats so some 7.2% of city residents voted for him. New York City has a population of 8.2 million. Of those 432,305 or 5% voted for Mamdani. This isn’t a mandate. It’s a city that tuned out the election because it saw no one worth voting for and ceded the playing field to radicals and extremists. The media is doing its best to hype those numbers as a stunning mandate when what they really represent are high levels of turnout by Mamadani’s base and low turnout by everyone else. Who are those 5%? They aren’t New Yorkers because polls showed us Mamdani performing poorly with anyone over 50, with African-American, Latino and working class white voters. What’s left? White hipsters and Muslim immigrants. Mamdani’s base isn’t New Yorkers, it’s a coalition of white hipsters and Muslim immigrants, most of them weren’t even in the city during 9/11, like Mamdani, have no roots in the city, and no connection to its history. The quintessential New Yorker, as envisioned by a thousand Hollywood movies, TV shows and Broadway musicals, still exists, but is harder to find than ever. The city of those movies and shows can be glimpsed as a palimpsest under layers of chain stores, illegal migrants, social justice projects and vegan eateries before it vanishes again in the rain. What happened to New York is what happened to legendary cities across the country and around the world, from Philly to London, which is that the revival of the 90s was the final act in driving out its working class and middle class population. Rents soared until the only young people who could afford to live there were white hipsters and third world immigrants. And their politics became based on coalitions between the hipsters and the new arrivals. In New York City, as in London, it produced a Jihadist coalition that paved the way for a Muslim mayor. Even by 9/11, New York City already wasn’t ‘that city’. The Giuliani revolution that swept out bums and criminals was a victim of its own success. Much of the middle class had already left which was why so many of the victims of 9/11 were commuters. Those who didn’t were soon completely priced out. The working class, the Irish, Jewish and Italian men and women who appear as comic characters in countless shows, were soon priced out of everything except projects. Even as the world mourned for New York, the New Yorkers were disappearing. New York’s political system became a contest between establishment crooks from the old Democrat political machine and radicals from the new leftist insurgencies. Selecting Cuomo, an old crook with a venerable political lineage, to go up against a young hip radical was a political death wish. New Yorkers, with enough standards not to vote for Mamdani, were expected to go out and vote for a man they were almost certainly bound to hate and resent. The sudden unity behind Cuomo smacked of hypocrisy and made Mamdani seem like a genuine revolutionary. Most New Yorkers didn’t vote. They stayed home and allowed the 5% to have their way. Given a choice between two terrible candidates, in a city that has long since proven to be utterly corrupt, they opted out. They may have failed to protect the city, but the political establishment failed them badly by putting up Cuomo and seems likely to fail all over again as it now has to revert to holding up Mayor Eric Adams as the last best hope for New York City. In the 1991 Louisiana governor’s race between corrupt politicians Edwin Edwards and Neo-Nazi leader David Duke, bumper stickers read, “Vote for the crook, it’s important.” Voting for the crook may be important once more in New York City, but it’s not an ideal choice you want to give voters. Not unless you want below 30% turnout with the numbers favoring those who are most enthusiastic about their Neo-Neo-Nazi candidate and his plans to destroy the city. New Yorkers needed a real choice and instead they got a choice between eating a dead rat and committing suicide. Only 5% chose to commit suicide, but most didn’t want to eat a dead rat either. And the dead rat strategy is going to be a longshot in any political campaign. The best way to beat an evil candidate is with a better choice, not with a lesser evil. New York’s political system, without meaningful Republican participation, has decayed into a one-party system. Its already corrupt rules were further rejiggered to favor radicals with ranked choice voting, and whose elections are as shady as those of Chicago, Philly and Los Angeles. There’s no particular reason to trust the Mamdani election results than there is to trust the similar shady mayoral elections in Chicago and Los Angeles that gave their respective cities two radical destroyers in the form of Mayor Brandon Johnson and Mayor Karen Bass. It is all too possible that they will have a third candidate elected in a dubious election by a radical minority. Read more: https://www.danielgreenfield.org/2025/06/only-5-of-new-yorkers-voted-for-mamdani.html

Only 5% of New Yorkers Voted for Mamdani Daniel Greenfield's original articles and reporting delve into terrorism, politics and world affairs danielgreenfield.org
Saved - April 27, 2025 at 1:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An illegal immigrant was arrested for stealing Kristi Noem's Gucci bag, which contained $3,000 in cash, her passport, and other personal items, while she was dining with family in Washington, DC. The theft occurred on April 20, and a second suspect remains at large. Noem described the incident as shocking, noting the thief's professionalism. DC US Attorney Ed Martin stated that the suspects are part of a larger robbery crew and emphasized that they will face prosecution and deportation. Security footage captured the theft, revealing the suspect's careful planning.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Masked illegal immigrant who allegedly stole Kristi Noem’s Gucci bag containing $3K in cash, passport arrested: sources | Joe Marino, Anna Young & Jennie Taer, New York Post An illegal immigrant was arrested Saturday for stealing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s pricey Gucci bag containing $3,000 in cash and other personal items – and a second migrant suspect is still on the loose, according to sources. Noem, 53, was on an Easter outing with her family at The Capital Burger in Washington, DC, when the masked thief stole the luxury shoulder bag, which also contained her driver’s license, passport, DHS badge and apartment keys on April 20. The suspect, whose identity was not immediately available, was busted by the DC Metro Police and the Secret Service, sources said. The perp, who is believed to be part of a large east coast robbery crew, is expected to appear in court early next week as law enforcement hunt for his accomplice, sources said. Officials are also looking for a second suspect who is also reportedly an illegal migrant. DC US Attorney Ed Martin noted it is unlikely Noem was targeted based on her high-profile position. “There is no indication it was because of that,” Martin told NBC News. “It was frankly, it was a nice looking purse. This was not an amateur. This was a person, a thief, that knew how to do this. You could see how he scouted the room out.” The bag, available for $4,400 per the label’s website, was on the ground at the former South Dakota governor’s table when it was taken, according to a complaint filed with local police. The high-end purse also contained a Louis Vuitton Clemence Purse inside, which sells for $600, according to the report. Security footage captured a white man in a N95 surgical mask, dark pants, a “fur-type” collar and a ball cap lift the DHS honcho’s bag before leaving the restaurant located about a mile from the White House. The suspect glanced around the restaurant before grabbing Noem’s bag, covering it with his jacket and then hustling out of the restaurant, according to sources who described the video. “It was kind of shocking, actually, because it was sitting right by my feet. I actually felt my purse — he hooked with his foot and drug it a few steps away and dropped a coat over it and took it,” Noem, who oversees the Secret Service, US Customs and Border Protection and the Coast Guard, recounted to podcaster Vince Coglianese. “I thought it was my grandkids kicking me in the legs, but it was very professionally done,” she added on the “Vince” podcast. “It tells me that this happens all the time to people, and that they live in communities where this is a danger and it reaffirms why I’m here.” ... Martin assured the alleged robbers will never step foot in the country again now that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement is involved in the case. “President Trump’s direction to us is we charge these folks that are here illegally and we prosecute them, as well as deport them when need be, you know, as soon as that can happen,” he told NBC. “What I can tell you is he won’t be back on the streets of America.” Read more: https://nypost.com/2025/04/26/us-news/mask-wearing-thief-who-allegedly-stole-kristi-noems-gucci-bag-containing-3k-in-cash-passport-arrested-sources/

Exclusive | Masked illegal immigrant who allegedly stole Kristi Noem’s Gucci bag containing $3K in cash, passport arrested: sources The masked-wearing thief who stole Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s Gucci bag containing $3,000 in cash has been arrested, sources told The Post Saturday. nypost.com
Saved - April 6, 2025 at 11:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended a protest in Washington DC against President Trump and Elon Musk, where I observed various dynamics at play. Some protesters appeared to be bussed in, and I noted a young speaker claiming to represent trans youth. A particularly striking moment occurred when I interviewed a protester holding a sign against Trump. He struggled to articulate why he considered Trump a fascist and revealed he received his sign and talking points for free. The materials were linked to a Maoist leader, raising questions about the protest's authenticity and organization.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Anti-Trump Protester Speechless When Asked Why He’s Protesting – Pulls Out Communist-Leader’s Talking Points Handed to Him With “Free Sign” | Brian Lupo, The Gateway Pundit A protest against President Trump and Elon Musk is underway in Washington DC today.  The Gateway Pundit earlier reported on the youngest member of Congress threatening “subpoenas and investigations” if they take back the majority. But is this an organic rally?  Or is it more in line with colour revolutions that the ‘Deep State’ within the U.S. has orchestrated across the globe, most notably the Orange Revolution (2004-2005) and Maidan in Ukraine (2013-2014)? MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow was promoting these protests last night on her show, telling her audience, “Go to bed kind of early.  Hydrate.  Eat your Wheaties in the morning.  Maybe put off that Friday night cocktail to make it a Saturday night cocktail…I’m only saying that because tomorrow is going to be very busy.” Maddow then brought on Soros-funded Indivisible co-executive director Ezra Levin to promote the protests. This type of media rhetoric is right in line with the USAID-funded news organizations that popped up in Ukraine in late November, 2013, to promote the Maidan.  It is worth checking out Oliver Stone’s Ukraine on Fire for free here to understand the innerworkings of USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy in helping to orchestrate these colour revolutions. Journalists on the ground are documenting people being bussed in, some dressed head-to-toe in “full Islamic garb” and donning Palestinian flags, as shown in a video posted by Laura Loomer to X. Another video showing “protesters” being bussed in was posted by Texas Patriot on X, showing at least five buses near the Washington Monument. During one speech at a “Hands Off 2020” stage, Stella Keating took to the microphone claiming to be “the first trans teen to ever testify before the United States Senate.”  After a couple of minutes of ranting about not being “the threat” but rather “we are the future,” he ended by saying, “The question isn’t whether we belong, the question is what are you willing to do defend us?!” before walking off the stage. But perhaps the most hilarious engagement thus far came from Ted Goodman, who is on the ground interviewing “protesters.”  During an interview with a man holding a sign that reads, “The Fascist Trump Regime Must Go!” Goodman learns that he was given the sign for free along with two pages worth of talking points. Goodman asked, “What makes Trump a ‘fascist’?” “Uhhhhhh….welll……he does things without, um, he just does anything he wants and not following laws and, you know….he’s a convicted felon, you know!  And that’s all I know.” Goodman follows up, “Your sign says he’s a fascist.  What makes him a fascist?” At this point, another protester interjects and says that “one of the things, he’s trying to control the media, right?  He’s trying to control the narrative.” “How is he trying to control the media?  Doesn’t every President try to control the narrative?” The “protester” admits that Presidents try to control “their own narrative” and then veers off to the renaming of the Gulf of America and “not allowing the Associated Press to come into the White House.” It is worth noting that President Trump has answered more questions and engaged more with the Press in his first two months than Joe Biden did in essentially his entire time in Office. Goodman follows up and reiterates what makes President Trump a fascist.  At this point, the first ‘protester’ pulls out a piece of paper. “What’s that??  Who gave you that??” “The people that gave me the sign,” he responds.  “It’s a free sign.” The ‘protester’ hands it over to Goodman and then pulls out another paper, which he also hands over to Goodman. “So what brings you out here today?” “Uhhhh just because I saw people hanging out with people,” he responds. The paper is apparently from Bob Avakian, a UC Berkeley Maoist and the Chairman of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA and the son of a former Alameda County Superior Court judge.  Avakian has a history with the Students for a Democratic Society and the Black Panther Party dating back to the 1960s. Read more: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/anti-trump-protester-speechless-when-asked-why-hes/

Video Transcript AI Summary
More than 1,300 protests are planned in all 50 states, expected to be the largest single day of protest since Donald Trump took office. Indivisible cofounder Ezra Levin says the response has been incredible, spurred by the Wisconsin election, Cory Booker's speech, and Donald Trump's global attack on economies. There are over a hundred events in California, more than 60 in New York, and more than 50 in Washington, plus multiple events in states like Montana and Alaska. Levin says normal, everyday people are participating because they've seen institutions fail to support liberal democracy. The overarching theme is "hands off," but people are participating for different reasons, including hands off the Department of Education, Social Security, Medicaid, trans kids, communities, civil rights, and democracy. Levin says it's good that different things are bringing different people to this fight, and they can all come together and say no.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feels like it. Right? That said, may I suggest that you, go to bed kinda early, hydrate, eat your Wheaties in the morning, maybe put off that Friday night cocktail to make it a Saturday night cocktail this week, if at all? I'm only saying that because tomorrow is going to be very busy. Saturday is going to be very busy. I said at the top of the show, there are more than 1,200 protests planned for tomorrow in all 50 states. I stand corrected. It is more than 1,300 protests planned in more than in in in all 50 states. It's expected to be the largest single day of protest since Donald Trump took office. Joining us now is Ezra Levin. He's cofounder of Indivisible, which is one of the groups that is promoting these events tomorrow. Ezra, thanks very much for joining us tonight. You were here, just a couple of three weeks ago, talking about the earliest idea for April 5 being sort of a hub for events all over the country and in Washington. How has the organizing gone? What the what has the response been compared to what you expected? Speaker 1: Gosh, Rachel, it's been incredible. Can I just say it has been incredible? We we knew when we announced three weeks ago on the show that this was gonna be the week where we saw an election in Wisconsin. We were cautiously optimistic about that election in Wisconsin for the supreme court. We didn't know we were gonna kick Elon Musk's butt all across the state, but we were cautiously optimistic. We also didn't know that Cory Booker was gonna give this incredible speech inspiring all of us and telling us that he was taking a stand in response to pushes from his own constituents. We also didn't know that Donald Trump was gonna launch a global attack on the economies of not just not our economy, but the global economy. This confluence of events, this this sense that they are overreaching so much and there is a possibility to fight back and win is leading to this just incredible response. As you said, more than 1,300 events every single state. Yes. You know, there are over a hundred events in California. There are more than 60 in the state of New York, more than 50 in Washington, but it's not just blue states, Rachel. We see 17 events across the state of Montana, fourteen across Alaska. This is everywhere. We're not just talking about one event in every state. We're talking about multiple, sometimes dozens of events, and these are normal everyday people who are saying, hey. I've had enough. I've seen institutions fall. I've seen the universities. I've seen businesses. I've seen law firms not stand up, not support our liberal democracy. So what am I gonna do as an individual? Well, I'm gonna do my part. I'm gonna show up. That's what tomorrow is about. And it's gosh, Rachel, it is inspiring to see so many people hop on board this train. Speaker 0: The theme under which this is sort of loosely organized is hands off. I've seen people use all sorts of different types of phrasing around the different types of protest that they're gonna be part of. And it seems like it's it's lots of different groups who are organizing. And in some cases, it's no groups. It's just individual people who are coming out with their friends and neighbors. But it seems like the hands off messaging is the most overarching phrase that we're gonna hear tomorrow, the most overarching idea. Right? Speaker 1: One of the beautiful things about this is it's meeting people where they are. We are all coming to this for a different reason. We can say, hands off the Department of Education. Hands off our Social Security. Hands off our Medicaid. Hands off our trans kids. Hands off our communities. Hands off our civil rights. Hands off our democracy. Different things are bringing different people to this fight. That's good. That's okay. We can all come together and say no, and that's what we're gonna see tomorrow. Speaker 0: Yeah. Popular front. Very, very, very, very, very big tent. If for some reason you don't like what Donald Trump is doing to the country, there's a very large tent that is open to you, and people are gonna be
Video Transcript AI Summary
One individual believes Trump is a fascist because he does everything he wants and doesn't follow laws, citing his felony conviction. Another claims Trump is a fascist because he tries to control the media, giving the example of renaming the Gulf of Mexico and not allowing the Associated Press into the White House. This person also states that a core tenet of fascism is creating an enemy and blaming them. One of the individuals received the sign and a handout from someone at a gatekeeper's house. They say they are protesting because of executive overreach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what what makes Trump a fascist? What makes Trump a fascist? Speaker 1: He does does things without Speaker 0: Yeah. Talk loud. I don't want my mic on. Speaker 1: I I'm not really committed to interview with someone. Sorry? He just doesn't he just does everything he wants and, you know, not following flaws or, you know, he was a he's a convicted felon. You know? That's all I know. Speaker 0: But your your your sign says he's a fascist, and I'm just curious what makes him a fascist. Speaker 2: Well, one of the things is that he's trying to control the the media. Right? Speaker 0: Say that again? Speaker 2: He's trying to control the the narrative, like Speaker 0: How is he trying to control the media? Doesn't every president try to control the narrative? Speaker 2: They try to control their own narrative, but one of the things that Trump has done, for example, is the renaming the, you know, the Gulf Of Mexico, and then not allowing the Associated Press to come into the White House. Basically, you know, trying to get Speaker 0: What are your feelings about him renaming the Gulf Of Mexico as the Gulf Of America when a majority of the Gulf is in fact on the coast of America as opposed to Mexico? Speaker 2: I mean, it's kind of pointless. People Speaker 0: Is it pointless? Speaker 2: Yeah. People call it the Gulf Of Mexico. Speaker 1: What's the point Speaker 0: positive tourism impact potentially? Speaker 2: Tourism has been down heavily. So I Speaker 0: don't wanna get in a tourism debate. My question is the sign says Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: The fascist Trump regime must go. Yeah. And so I'm just curious what makes him a fascist. You pointed out that maybe something about his relationship with the media, he wants to control it, but Yeah. How again, let's you're specific you're calling him a fascist. Yeah. Well, what him a fascist? One Speaker 2: of the core tenants of fascism is creating an enemy. Right? And blaming the phones on him. Speaker 0: What's that? Speaker 1: Oh, Some paper gave me. Yeah. Speaker 0: Who gave you that? Speaker 1: The people that gave me the sign. It's a free sign. Speaker 0: Oh, they someone gave you the sign Yeah. And then they gave you the handout. No. So are you reading it now to see try to answer the question? Speaker 1: Yeah. But, I mean Speaker 0: Can I Speaker 1: see that? Speaker 0: Can you hold Speaker 1: that up? Speaker 0: I'm just not Oh, I'm just curious. Speaker 1: Maybe you you can have it. Speaker 0: I can have it? Speaker 2: Yeah. You can Speaker 0: have it. Alright. So this so where did you get the sign? Speaker 1: Oh, all the way in the gatekeeper's house. Okay. Yeah. Was just paper store. Speaker 0: And that's another one? They gave you two pieces of paper? Yeah. They have that one too? Speaker 1: Yes. You can have both. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. So what brings you guys out here today? Speaker 1: Just because I saw people were hanging out with people from Yeah. Speaker 2: Same thing as everyone else. Executive overreach. Oh.
Anti-Trump Protester Speechless When Asked Why He's Protesting - Pulls Out Communist-Leader's Talking Points Handed to Him With "Free Sign" | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo A viral moment unfolds as an anti-Trump protester struggles to articulate his stance, revealing pre-prepared talking points linked to a controversial figure. This incident raises questions about the authenticity of organized dissent. thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - February 26, 2025 at 3:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent poll reveals that 75 percent of Democrats believe President Biden's migration policies were not intentional, despite evidence suggesting a deliberate encouragement of migration. In contrast, 52 percent of Americans and 80 percent of Republicans think the Democrats, led by Alejandro Mayorkas, actively facilitated the influx of migrants. Elon Musk criticized this stance, calling it treasonous, while some Democrats acknowledge the need for better border control. The poll also indicates strong support for elements of Trump's immigration policies, including deportation of illegal immigrants with criminal records.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Shock Poll: 75 Percent of Democrats Say Joe Biden’s Migration Flood Was an Accident | Neil Munro, Breitbart News A staggering 75 percent of Democrats do not believe President Joe Biden’s deputies deliberately kept the border open for migrants, according to a February poll by Harvard Harris. The February 19-20 poll of 2,443 registered voters comes just weeks after President Donald Trump deliberately shut down Biden’s destructive, expensive, and deadly migration during his first few hours in the White House. Fifty-two percent of Americans and 80 percent of Republicans recognize Biden’s Democrats — led by pro-migration border chief Alejandro Mayorkas — deliberately encouraged the inflow of up to nine million southern migrants. Those inadmissible migrants entered via a bewildering number of illegal and quasi-legal routes, such as “parole” and the “Welcome Corps at Work” programs. They were aided by billions of dollars in government funding and frequently welcomed as a boost to the economy. Amid the massive evidence of a deliberate policy, 75 percent of Democrats said the inflow “was not their deliberate policy.” So do 51 percent of people who describe themselves as independents or “other.” The poll asked: “Do you think Democrats deliberately kept the Southern border open to bring millions of immigrants into the country illegally or was that not their deliberate policy?” Elon Musk tweeted a response, describing the Democrats’ open-borders policy as “treason”: It’s not just that borders were “left open”. There was a massive, concerted campaign to usher in as many illegals as possible on an unprecedented scale in order to achieve permanent one-party rule. Musk’s own views on migration are tangled: He opposes illegal migration but favors high levels of white-collar migration via the uncapped H-1B program that has pushed millions of American college graduates out of good jobs and careers. The Democrats’ reluctance to recognize the party’s deliberate choice policy to open the borders may be a psychological defense to hide the colossal damage caused by their inconsistent views. The migration caused massive damage both to Americans and to the migrants that Democrats claimed to protect and promote. ... But some Democrats are admitting the obvious. David Leonhardt, a liberal writer at the New York Times, wrote on February 23: Supporters of mass migration often claim that it is inevitable, stemming from some combination of demography, globalization and climate change. Yet like most arguments for historical inevitability, this one is more wishful than accurate. Countries can exert substantial control over their borders. Japan has long done so. Denmark has recently done so. Biden tightened policy in his last year in office, and border traffic plummeted. Trump has pushed it even lower. If anything, modern technology, such as employment-verification systems, can make enforcement easier than in the past. When immigration advocates say that controlling borders is impossible, they are adopting an anti-government nihilism inconsistent with larger goals of progressivism. The poll also shows strong support for much of Trump’s migration policy. Eight-one percent support “deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes,” and 76 percent support “losing the border with added security and policies that discourage illegal crossings.” Read more: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/02/25/poll-75-percent-of-democrats-say-bidens-migration-was-an-accident/

Shock Poll: 75 Percent of Democrats Say Joe Biden's Migration Flood Was an Accident 75 percent of Democrats do not believe Biden's deputies deliberately kept the border open for migrants, according to a Harvard Harris poll. breitbart.com
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 4:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across alarming reports indicating that cartels at the southern border are escalating threats against U.S. border officers, including the use of weaponized drones armed with explosives. Recent memos from Customs and Border Protection highlight these threats and urge officers to wear ballistic gear and carry long rifles. The situation is tense, with ongoing violence between cartel factions. Additionally, discussions are underway about potential military responses, including invoking the Insurrection Act to combat cartel activities on U.S. soil.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

CBP Memo Reveals Cartel Members Are Deploying Weaponized Drones for Potential Use Against CBP Officers | Jordan Conradson, The Gateway Pundit Cartels at the southern border are reportedly escalating violent threats against U.S. border and law enforcement officers, with social media posts encouraging violence and the authorization of weaponized drones for use against border officers. Copies of recent memos sent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers detail the threats on social media, NewsNation reports. Additionally, officers are warned that the cartels are expected to use drones armed with explosives. This news comes as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth recently said, “All options are on the table,” when he was asked if the U.S. will use military force against the cartels in Mexico. As The Gateway Pundit reported, President Trump also sent a message to “all who would attack Americans” on Saturday, stating, “WE WILL FIND YOU, AND WE WILL KILL YOU!” after announcing precision air strikes against ISIS in Somalia. “This action further degrades ISIS’s ability to plot and conduct terrorist attacks threatening U.S. citizens, our partners, and innocent civilians and sends a clear signal that the United States always stands ready to find and eliminate terrorists who threaten the United States and our allies, even as we conduct robust border-protection and many other operations under President Trump’s leadership,” Hegseth said following the execution of the airstrikes indicating strikes on the cartels could be considered. This also comes after recent incidents of cartel violence on the Southern Border. As The Gateway Pundit reported, last Monday, Border Patrol agents exchanged gunfire with Mexican drug cartel members who tried to bring a group of illegals over the border in Fronton, Texas. Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller recently indicated that President Trump may invoke the Insurrection Act to combat the cartels in line with the “national objective of eradicating their physical presence on US soil.” The Insurrection Act "is still being considered based on operational needs on the southern border," said Miller. President Trump has already sent U.S. troops to the southern border, and military cargo planes are being used for the first time in history to deport planeloads of illegal aliens from Arizona and Texas. News Nation correspondent Ali Bradley explained that CBP officers are encouraged to wear ballistic gear and carry long rifles. WATCH: Bradley: We also just got her hands on a memo out of the Rio Grande Valley sector that actually says that—this is kind of crazy here—that the cartels authorized the use of weaponized drones, explosives, against CBP personnel and US law enforcement down there at the southern border. Now they're actually being encouraged, of course, to remain cognizant and vigilant, but they're also being encouraged to use their long arms, Blake. I have never seen this in a CBP memo before. They say, wear your ballistic gear… They are saying, watch out for these weaponized drones. We've seen a lot of in-fighting with two different factions of the cartel down in Tamaulipas; that is on the south side of the border in the Rio Grande Valley. And they have like an all out war happening between these cartel factions, so they are warning now that they might be using these weaponized drones against US personnel on this side, so definitely cause for concern there. Read more: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/cbp-memo-reveals-cartel-members-are-deploying-weaponized/

Video Transcript AI Summary
A memo from the Rio Grande Valley Sector reveals that cartels are authorized to use weaponized drones and explosives against CBP personnel and U.S. law enforcement at the southern border. Agents are advised to remain vigilant and to carry their long arms. There is ongoing infighting between rival cartel factions in Tamaulipas, which has escalated to an all-out war. This situation raises significant concerns about the potential use of these drones against U.S. personnel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also just got our hands on a memo out of the Rio Grande Valley Sector that actually says that, this is kind of crazy here, that the cartels authorize the use of weaponized drones, explosives against CB person CBP personnel and US law enforcement down there at the southern border. Now they're actually being, encouraged, of course, to remain cognizant and vigilant, but they're also being encouraged to use their long arms, Blake. I have never seen this in a CBP memo before. They say, where are you going to see here? Yes. Bones? But they're telling them, hey. Have your long arms. Yes. They are saying, watch out for these weaponized drones. We've seen a lot of infighting with 2 different factions of the cartel down in Tamaulipas that is on the south side of the border in the Rio Grande Valley, and they have, like, an all out war happening between these cartel factions. So they are warning now that they might be using these weaponized drones against US personnel on this side. So definitely cause for concern there. Wow.
CBP Memo Reveals Cartel Members Are Deploying Weaponized Drones for Potential Use Against CBP Officers (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson A newly uncovered CBP memo highlights the alarming use of weaponized drones by cartel members, raising significant concerns about security and law enforcement challenges at the border. This development demands urgent attention. thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 3:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates has called for AI to censor those questioning vaccines, labeling them as a threat to public health and claiming they incite violence. In a CNBC interview, he advocated for real-time censorship of vaccine-related misinformation, which he argues undermines vaccination efforts. Gates, heavily invested in vaccine initiatives through his organizations, suggests imposing speech boundaries to combat what he sees as misinformation. His comments have ignited discussions about free speech and the suppression of dissenting views on vaccines.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Bill Gates Calls for ‘Anti-Vaxxers’ to Be Censored by AI: Questioning ‘Vaccines’ Is ‘Inciting Violence’ | Frank Bergman, Slay News Billionaire Bill Gates is calling for members of the general public to be censored by artificial intelligence (AI) if they question the official narratives regarding “vaccines.” Gates, the Jeffrey Epstein-linked co-founder of Microsoft, made the call during a recent interview with CNBC. He was discussing the “threat” of “anti-vaxxers” and promoting plans for handling “vaccine hesitancy” using “real-time” censorship imposed by AI. Gates argues that those who urge people to avoid vaccines are “inciting violence.” Therefore, he insists that “anti-vaxxers” are a “threat” to public health. In response, Gates proposes a totalitarian approach, calling for speech “boundaries.” He claims that AI-powered computer systems can weed out and eliminate “vaccine misinformation” in real time. Gates runs multiple organizations that are heavily invested in vaccines. He has become one of the most prominent advocates for mass-injecting the public, from the traditional antigen-based biologics to the experimental mRNA “vaccines.” Gates is still pushing for Covid mRNA shots, despite the “vaccines” being linked to excess mortality worldwide. Gates recently announced plans to turn all vaccines into mRNA. ... Now the prominent philanthropist wants to use artificial intelligence (AI) for real-time censorship of vaccine-related “misinformation.” Conveniently, much of the so-called “misinformation” he wants to target is related to information that counters his plans. His comments during the recent CNBC interview have sparked a heated debate about free speech rights, mind control, and the rewriting of history by the elite. Gates, who is deeply and psychotically invested in vaccines through the Gates Foundation, GAVI, and the World Health Organization (WHO), has increasingly focused on combating vaccine “misinformation.” However, this form of censorship is really just the suppression of vaccine injury testimonials and the abolition of informed consent. In his latest interview, he expressed a desire to impose “boundaries” on speech, particularly relating to vaccines. Gates argued that free speech incites violence or deters individuals from getting vaccinated. Read more: https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-calls-anti-vaxxers-censored-ai-warns-questioning-vaccines-inciting-violence/

Video Transcript AI Summary
We support free speech, but there are limits, especially when it leads to violence or discourages vaccination. It's important to define these boundaries. If rules are established, how can they be enforced effectively? With billions of online activities, relying on AI to monitor and enforce these rules is crucial, as catching harmful content after the fact can lead to irreversible damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should have free speech, but if you're inciting violence, if you're causing people not to take vaccines, you know, where are those boundaries that even the US, should, you know, have rules. And then if you have rules, you know, what is it? Is there some AI that encodes those rules because you have billions of activity and, you know, if you catch it a day later, the harm is is done.
Bill Gates Calls for 'Anti-Vaxxers' to Be Censored by AI: Questioning 'Vaccines' Is 'Inciting Violence' - Slay News Billionaire Bill Gates is calling for members of the general public to be censored by artificial intelligence (AI) if they question the official narratives regarding "vaccines." slaynews.com

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

I scan thousands of headlines every day to bring you most interesting stories here on X. If you'd like to buy me a coffee to say thanks, subscribe here on X or at http://owengregorian.locals.com for more content and to support my work!

OwenGregorian Connect with OwenGregorian and other members of OwenGregorian community owengregorian.locals.com
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 7:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how President-elect Trump can legally fire any of Biden's appointees, thanks to a court ruling stemming from Sean Spicer's case. The court confirmed that the president has the authority to dismiss any presidential appointee, regardless of their term length. This ruling empowers Trump to remove over 4,000 of Biden's appointments without restrictions. Spicer emphasized that the case was about establishing this legal precedent, not about his own position. I also encourage readers to subscribe for more updates.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Trump can fire anybody he wants, thanks to Sean Spicer | Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner President-elect Donald Trump is arriving at the White House armed with a legal weapon that will let him fire any of President Joe Biden’s appointees. Thanks in part to a court fight former Trump White House spokesman Sean Spicer lost over his firing by Biden from a three-year term to the Board of Visitors to the United States Naval Academy, the incoming president will have the legal backing to dump any of Biden’s over 4,000 appointments who try to stick around. And the best part, Spicer told Secrets, “They’ll have no one to blame but Biden himself.” The case dates to Sept. 8, 2021, when Biden began to fire Trump allies from the visitor boards at the academies of the Navy, the Air Force, and the Army. Spicer and others, including Russ Vought (just picked by Trump to head the Office of Management and Budget) and former Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway, were unceremoniously dumped despite several of them having time left on their three-year terms. Spicer and Vought sued, saying that unlike White House staff or others appointed by a prior president, they couldn’t be fired because of their congressionally mandated terms. They lost, however, when a judge essentially ruled that the president could fire any presidential appointee, whether they had terms or not. A further effort failed, too. Spicer said that is exactly what he hoped the courts would do because he wanted to help a future Trump presidency fire Biden’s picks without having its hands tied. “What no one ever understood was this was not about actually getting back on the board, because my term had been expired for months. It was forcing them to argue in the affirmative that they had the ultimate authority to fire anybody at any time, which they did. And the court accepted that. So the Biden administration is now on record in court, and the court agreed that the president had absolute authority to fire anyone he wants,” Spicer said in an interview. Read more: https://washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3254409/trump-can-fire-anybody-he-wants-thanks-to-sean-spicer/

Trump can fire anybody he wants, thanks to Sean Spicer - Washington Examiner And the best part, Sean Spicer told Secrets, “They’ll have no one to blame but Biden himself.” washingtonexaminer.com

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Thanks for reading. I scan thousands of headlines every day to bring you most interesting stories, on X. Subscribe here on X or at http://owengregorian.locals.com for more content and to support my work!

OwenGregorian Connect with OwenGregorian and other members of OwenGregorian community owengregorian.locals.com
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 8:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a recent episode of Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough delivered a passionate critique of social media influencers, expressing frustration over their ability to spread misinformation without consequences. His rant was sparked by Axios CEO Jim VandeHei's comments on the importance of traditional journalism, which Scarborough echoed. Mika Brzezinski appeared taken aback as Scarborough used strong language to emphasize his point about the value of reputable news sources. VandeHei reinforced the need for trust in journalism, urging viewers to evaluate news outlets critically.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Awkward moment Mika Brzezinski looks away while Joe Scarborough slams influencers in bizarre rant | Emma Richter, The Daily Mail MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski was spotted in an awkward on-air moment as her co-host and husband Joe Scarborough slammed citizen journalist influencers during a bizarre rant Monday. The host of Morning Joe appeared shocked as Scarborough unleashed a foul-mouthed rant against influencers and commenters who he claimed get away with lying on social media while 'what reporters do matters.' The intense conversation stemmed from a speech that Axios CEO Jim VandeHei gave at the National Press Club Thursday, where he called out Elon Musk for claiming that the media has been replaced by 'citizen journalists.' VandeHei joined the Morning Joe show Monday as the MSNBC team congratulated him on winning the Fourth Estate award alongside his publication's co-founder, Mike Allen - but the conversation quickly took a sharp turn. After the Morning Joe team praised VandeHei, Scarborough immediately hopped on the bandwagon, repeating the CEO's comment he made last week about influencers 'popping off on Twitter.' As Scarborough grew aggravated, he dropped a curse word, leaving Brezinski speechless. 'And like you said, this is what gets me,' Scarborough said in reference to VandeHei's speech. 'If someone pops off on Twitter, or some other social media, and they lie, they make mistakes - you know what the cost of that is? Nothing. They do it again. 'In fact, it helps them because algorithms are rigged, so you stir up sh**,' he added, as Brezinski jumped in her chair before briefly looking away. During his speech on Thursday, VandeHei defended journalism while taking jabs at social media users - specifically Musk, the owner of X (formally known as Twitter). 'Everything we do is under fire. Elon Musk sits on Twitter every day or X today saying like, 'We are the media. You are the media.' 'My message to Elon Musk is: Bullsh**! 'You're not the media, you having a blue checkmark, a Twitter handle, and 300 words of cleverness doesn't make you a reporter anymore than me looking at your head, and seeing that you have a brain and telling you have an awesome set of tools makes me a damn neurosurgeon, right?,' VandeHei added. The veteran journalist then said that 'being a reporter is hard, like really hard.' 'You have to care, you have to do the hard work, you have to get up every single day and say 'I want to get to the closest approximation of the truth without any fear, without any favoritism.' 'You don't do that by popping off on Twitter,' he explained. Scarborough told VandeHei that what he said 'continues to need to be said' because there is a lot of 'garbage flying around on social media.' 'What The New York Times does matters. What The Wall Street Journal does matters. What Jonathan Lemire does matters. What the Financial Times does matters. What MSNBC News and MSNBC reporters do matters,' he said. VandeHei agreed with Scarborough, as he mentioned that journalists aren't perfect. 'And it doesn't mean there aren't things that we get wrong,' he said, adding that he got so 'hopped up' during his speech because of what he's heard from reporters. 'I listen to so many reporters who feel like the industry is going to hell. Nobody trusts them, they're demoralized... And the truth is we don't have time to be demoralized! 'We don't have time to whine, we have to do our job! 'There is an information war out there,' VandeHei said adding, that 'there are still tens of millions of people who depend on great reporting.' Scarborough then referred back to those specific publications and stated that reporters that work for them 'don't have to worry' because  they 'print truth all the time.' He then shocked his co-anchor with his language before she chimed in and said: 'Right, the more you hate, the more you make.' VandeHei suggested that people should read articles from media outlets every day to determine if they can trust them. 'Use your own eyes - do you feel like they're trying to get to the closest approximation of the truth with every story, and that most of the time, if not almost all of the time, they do? 'If they do then you can trust it as a news source,' he added. Read more: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14123889/morning-joe-scarborough-influencer-rant-mika-brzezinski-msnbc.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Last week, you received the 2024 4th Estate Award from the National Press Club for your significant contributions to journalism, alongside Mike Allen. During your acceptance speech, you emphasized the importance of a free press in a democracy, highlighting that journalism is essential for transparency and truth. You criticized the notion that social media users can be considered reporters, asserting that true journalism requires hard work and dedication to uncovering the truth. You connected the struggles of reporters in the past with those today, stressing that credible journalism matters now more than ever, especially in an era where misinformation is rampant. You acknowledged the challenges faced by journalists but reinforced the vital role they play in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last week, you were awarded the 2024 4th Estate Award by the National Press Club along with Axios' The Great Mike Allen. So congratulation. That's fantastic. Speaker 1: So who the award recognizes journalists Speaker 0: who have made the award recognizes journalists who have made significant contributions to the industry, and you have. Specifically, you and Mikey were awarded for your work that has revolutionized how audiences consume news. And we have some of the remarks you made during your acceptance speech. Let's listen. Speaker 2: I hate this damn debate about, oh, we don't need the media. Like, it is not true. Think about what makes this I love this country. I'm a beneficiary of this country. Like, some from Wisconsin who can come and start 2 companies, be up here with an award, sit next to Mikey. I'm a beneficiary of it. But there's something about the country. There's something about it. Right? There's something about freedom, capitalism, the animal spirits of democracy. But at the core of that is maybe transparency, maybe a free press, maybe the ability to do your job without worrying to go to jail, maybe the ability to sit in a war zone and tell people what's actually happening so they're not just looking at distortion matters. It matters profoundly. It's why it's not like we just love getting up at 3 or 4 in the morning doing this every single day. Like, we do it because we love it. We do it because it matters. The work that we do matters. Everything we do is under fire. Elon Musk sits on Twitter every day or x today saying, like, we are the media. You are the media. My message to Elon Musk is bull you're not the media. You having thank you. You having a blue check mark, a Twitter handle, and 300 words of cleverness doesn't make you a reporter. Any more than me looking at your head and seeing that you have a brain and telling you have an awesome set of tools makes me a damn neurosurgeon. Right? Like, what we do, what journalists do, what you did in Mississippi, what Al Jazeera does in the Middle East. You proclaim yourself to be a reporter. Like, that's nonsense. Like, being a reporter is hard, really hard. You have to care. You have to do the hard work. You have to skid up every single day and say, I wanna get to the closest approximation of the truth without any fear, without any favoritism. You don't do that by popping off on Twitter. You don't do that by having an opinion. You do it by doing the hard work. Speaker 1: Yeah. Come on. So clap, everyone. Oh, well. First of all, I've gotta say, extraordinary content, it needed to be said. Yeah. It continues to need to be said when all of the garbage is flying around on social media, lying about reporters, lying about the hard work they do, lying about the hard work editors do, lying about everything up and down about not only their alternative set of facts, but alternative set of facts about what people like you do. And I love how you connected reporters in Mississippi in the 19 sixties to reporters fighting for their life to get the story out in the Middle East today. Jim, it was very powerful. Really good. Very powerful. Even if watch, they had even if we had to beat you more than we would if we ran a Dave Chappelle concert, it's I like that. Smiled manner. Speaker 0: He he Speaker 1: He's not preached it, though. He the cadence. I mean, I might be more than Well, let let me just say. Why why this is so important right now more than ever is because critics of the press are feeling more empowered than ever to lie more than ever. I've had friends for years going, oh, you know, I'm so overwhelmed, Joe, by the news. I don't read the new you know, where do you get your news then? Epic Times. I go, oh Oh god. Oh, oh, you get your news from a website run by Chinese, by conspiracy theorists in a Chinese religious cult. That's that is where you get them to know. Or or if social media people lying every day, every hour, every minute about the news, what you do matters. What the New York Times does matters. What the Wall Street Journal does matters. What Jonathan O'Mear does matters. What the Financial the NBC News and MSNBC reporters do matters. It matters. Speaker 2: And it doesn't mean there aren't things that we get wrong. And and and the reason I guess I was hopped up at that speech was I listened to so many reporters who feel like the industry is going to hell. Nobody trusts them. They're demoralized.
Mika Brzezinski looks away while Joe Scarborough slams influencers MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski appeared shocked as her co-host and husband Joe Scarborough unleashed a rant against influencers, who he said get away with lying on social media. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I provided an update on the investigation into 2,500 suspicious voter registration forms in Lancaster County, revealing that 17% are fraudulent. Four Pennsylvania counties, including Cambria, Monroe, and York, are also looking into potential fraud. In Lancaster, 57% of the forms are valid, while 26% remain under review. The vetting process is thorough, as some fraudulent forms contained accurate personal information but were not completed by the individuals listed. The investigation's timeline remains uncertain, but affected individuals have been notified.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Pennsylvania county gives update on probe of suspicious applications, says 17 percent are fraudulent | Just The News Lancaster County Commissioner Ray D’Agostino on Monday updated voters on an investigation into 2,500 suspicious voter registration forms that were flagged to the county's elections board last month, confirming that 17% of the forms so far are fraudulent. A total of four Pennsylvania counties are investigating possible fraudulent voter and mail-in ballot applications in the final spin into Election Day. Those counties are Cambria County, Lancaster County, Monroe County, and York County. York and Lancaster both uncovered thousands of potentially fraudulent applications, while Cambria and Monroe saw less than 50 each. D'Agostino said the majority of the suspicious forms in Lancaster County have been cleared, with 57% confirmed as valid voter registration applications. Another 26% are still under investigation because they are incomplete or unverified, and 17% were confirmed as fraudulent. "Those other two buckets are going to change, quite frankly, based on the continuing investigation," D’Agostino said of the applications still being reviewed, per Fox News. He also called the operation of vetting the applications a "painstaking process." Some of the forms that have been confirmed as fraudulent contained correct personal information such as the right address, phone, date of birth, driver’s license, and social security number, but the person on the application said they did not request the form, did not complete the form, and verified that the form contained a someone else's signature. It is not clear how long the rest of the investigation will take, but people who have been impacted by the investigation have been notified. The fraudulent and suspicious forms are not been limited to one specific party. Read more: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/lancaster-county-gives-update-suspicious-application-probe-says-17

Pennsylvania county gives update on probe of suspicious applications, says 17 percent are fraudulent Lancaster County Commissioner Ray D’Agostino said the majority of the suspicious forms in Lancaster County have been cleared, with 57% confirmed as valid voter registration applications. Another 26% are still under investigation because they are incomplete or unverified, and 17% were confirmed as fraudulent. justthenews.com
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 7:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked to learn that during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed that at least two FBI officials expressed disappointment that President Trump survived an assassination attempt. This incident involved a gunman, Thomas Crooks, who shot at Trump during a rally. Congressman Chip Roy questioned Wray about any communications from FBI agents regarding their feelings about the attempt, referencing past texts from 2015 and 2016. Wray confirmed that one official has been referred to the inspection division, raising questions about accountability.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

WOW! Wray Says There Were At Least Two Instances Where FBI Officials Expressed Disappointment That Trump Survived Assassination Attempt | The Gateway Pundit And we are supposed to believe that Trump would-be assassin Thomas Crooks acted alone? FBI Director Christopher Wray appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump. On July 13 President Trump was grazed in the ear after a 20-year-old gunman named Thomas Matthew Crooks climbed on a roof and took several shots at Trump and rallygoers in Butler. ... GOP Congressman Chip Roy (TX) asked Wray if any FBI agents expressed disappointment that Trump survived the assassination attempt. “In 2015 and 2016 top FBI officials infamously texted about “their insurance policy to make sure Trump was never elected or inaugurated as president,” Chip Roy said referring to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. “Have any FBI agents texted, emailed or expressed disappointment that Trump survived the assassination attempt or otherwise editorialized about the assassination attempt?” Chip Roy asked Wray. Wray said at least one FBI official has expressed disappointment that Trump wasn’t killed by the gunman. “That individual has been referred to our inspection division,” Wray said. Why wasn’t this person fired? Read more: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/wow-wray-admits-two-fbi-officials-expressed-disappointment/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016-2015, FBI officials texted about an "insurance policy" against Trump. No FBI agents expressed disappointment about Trump surviving an assassination attempt. One individual made inappropriate comments and was referred for disciplinary action. The speaker will share any further incidents with the committee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2016 to 2015, top FBI officials, infamously texted about, quote, their insurance policy to make sure Trump was never elected or inaugurated as president. Have any FBI agents texted, emailed, or expressed disappointment that Trump survived the assassination assassination attempt or otherwise editorialized about the assassination attempt? I Speaker 1: don't know about any agents. There have been, at least 2 instances, I think, or one instance of an individual, who posted something, that I consider outrageous and totally inappropriate, and unacceptable. And that individual has been referred to our inspection division, which is the arm, our sort of internal affairs investigatory arm that does the disciplinary process. Speaker 0: Okay. Will you report back to this committee any other incidents? Speaker 1: I'll do my best to share information with the committee. Speaker 0: You tell
WOW! Wray Says There Were At Least Two Instances Where FBI Officials Expressed Disappointment That Trump Survived Assassination Attempt (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila And we are supposed to believe that Trump would-be assassin Thomas Crooks acted alone? thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 6:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas allegedly denied stronger Secret Service protection for former President Trump, according to Rep. Mike Waltz. The House Homeland Security Committee plans to investigate these allegations. The accusation comes after Trump was grazed by a bullet at a Pennsylvania rally, where one attendee was killed and two others injured by a shooter who was also killed. The Committee will conduct thorough oversight into the incident. Mayorkas and the Department of Homeland Security have not yet commented on the matter.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Mayorkas denied 'repeated requests' for more Secret Service protection for Trump, GOP lawmaker says | Fox News The House House Homeland Security Committee will probe the Secret Service allegations, a source tells Fox News Digital A House Republican lawmaker is alleging that Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas denied stronger Secret Service protection for former President Trump multiple times. Rep. Mike Waltz, R-Fla., made the accusation hours after Trump was grazed by a bullet at his Saturday Pennsylvania rally. "I have very reliable sources telling me there have been repeated requests for stronger secret service protection for President Trump. Denied by Secretary Mayorkas," Waltz wrote on X. The House Homeland Security Committee is planning on investigating reports that Trump was denied stronger Secret Service protection before the rally, a source told Fox News Digital. "The Committee has seen these reports, as well, and are going to be conducting thorough oversight into what happened both leading up to and in the immediate aftermath of the attempted assassination of President Trump. Obviously, such reports are deeply troubling and demand investigation," the source said. One rally attendee was killed, and two others were injured after a shooter opened fire at the former president's campaign rally, according to a Secret Service statement. The shooter was also killed. Waltz, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, would not elaborate on his comments when Fox News Digital reached out to his office. Fox News Digital also reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for comment. Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-denied-repeated-requests-more-secret-service-protection-trump-gop-lawmaker-says

Mayorkas denied 'repeated requests' for more Secret Service protection for Trump, GOP lawmaker says The House Homeland Security Committee will look into accusations that former President Trump was denied additional Secret Service protections. foxnews.com
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 3:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 2022 mid-term elections, Democrats gained control of the Michigan Legislature, passing bills that transform election procedures and make it easier to commit fraud. Proposal 2, passed by voters, authorized changes to voting procedures, but the new legislation goes beyond what was authorized. The bills give more power to election clerks and the Secretary of State, reducing safeguards against fraud. The handling and counting of mail-in votes will be difficult to observe, and alleged fraud can no longer be used to request a recount. Michigan Republican legislators opposed these bills, raising concerns about who benefits from the changes.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Voting Shenanigans in Michigan | Eric Dawe In the 2022 mid-term elections in Michigan, voters handed control of the Michigan Legislature to the Democrats, giving them a majority in both the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate -- something that hasn’t happened for forty years. Since then, they’ve been working hand in glove with our notorious Democrat governor, Gretchen Whitmer, including passing a slew of bills that significantly transform election procedures in the State of Michigan and make it easier to commit election fraud, while at the same time making it harder to uncover it. ... Back to the story at hand. In November of 2022, Michigan voters also passed Proposal 2, a proposal to amend the voting procedures previously authorized in the State of Michigan’s Constitution. While the proposal passed with (ostensibly) 60% of the vote, the recent batch of bills purportedly written to implement the changes of Proposal 2 goes significantly beyond what was authorized by the voters. The new legislation hands over verification of absentee ballots from an elected bipartisan board of inspectors to city or township clerks. They also significantly expand the powers of election clerks and the Secretary of State. For example, the Secretary of State can now dictate election procedures without going through the formal rule-making process. This greatly increases the potential for fraud and significantly reduces the safeguards against it. Senate Bill 367 allows clerks in municipalities with at least 5,000 people to process and count absentee ballots eight days before Election Day. The eight-day, pre-election day window will make it very difficult for poll watchers to observe the handling and counting of mail-in votes. (What could possibly go wrong there?) Municipalities will work closely with the SoS, to whom the bill assigns the task of unilaterally “supervising the implementation and conduct of early voting for state and federal elections.” (God forbid that the SoS has entrenched political biases.) According to Representative Ruth Johnson (R) Holly, MI, these bills remove every instance of the word ‘fraud’ in the previous law and replace them with the word, ‘error.’ Criminality of intent is thus effectively insulated from prosecution and the ability to address election fraud is stripped away. In fact, under Senate Bills 603 and 604, alleged fraud can no longer be used to request a recount. Perhaps that’s the reason why Michigan Republican legislators were uniformly opposed to these bills. With a Democrat governor, attorney general, and secretary of state, might it not be wise to ask who stands to benefit from these bills that subtly, but significantly, change the state’s previous law and render voting fraud virtually immune from prosecution? Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/05/voting_shenanigins_in_michigan.html

Voting Shenanigans in Michigan In the 2022 mid-term elections in Michigan, voters handed control of the Michigan Legislature to the Democrats, giving them a majority in both the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate -- something that hasn’t happened for f... americanthinker.com
Saved - April 14, 2024 at 9:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Chinese study reveals that approximately 13,000 islands worldwide have increased their land mass over the past two decades, debunking claims of rising sea levels made by climate alarmists. The study analyzes shoreline changes in Southeast Asian archipelagos, the Indian Ocean, and the Mediterranean. Another study on Tuvalu supports these findings, showing that many coastlines have increased their land mass despite facing higher sea-level rise rates.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels A Chinese study has revealed that approximately 13,000 islands worldwide have increased their land mass over the past two decades by 369.67 square kilometers (142.73 square miles), debunking claims that so-called climate change would make sea levels rise and wipe out islands. In the past few years, climate alarmists have insinuated that manmade climate change would swiftly drive shoreline erosion and island disappearance due to rising sea levels. But this Chinese study, published in the Journal of Coastal Research, has debunked these claims. (Related: Climate alarmists hype sea level rise by 2050, claim it could be 50 times greater than actual data.) The study, which highlights the impacts of climate change and human activities, examines surface and satellite records of existing studies to analyze shoreline changes in the 13,000 islands of Southeast Asian archipelagos, the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean. Based on the findings, an area equivalent to the size of the Isle of Wight has been added to these islands, totaling a remarkable 369.67 square kilometers. The researchers witnessed a net increase of 157.21 square kilometers (60.7 square miles) of land from when it was lost in the 1990s until 2020. Another study on the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu supported these claims. The Tuvalu study claims that 101 out of the 709 coastlines had increased their land mass by 2.9 percent while the rest had not experienced any loss of land. Additionally, the study found that 47 reef islands either expanded in size or maintained their stability over the past five decades. All this, despite facing sea-level rise rates surpassing the global average. Read more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-04-12-13000-islands-increased-land-mass-disproving-climate-alarmists.html

Approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased land mass over two decades, disproving claims of climate alarmists about rising sea levels – NaturalNews.com A Chinese study has revealed that approximately 13,000 islands worldwide have increased their land mass over the past two decades by 369.67 square kilometers (142.73 square miles), debunking claims that so-called climate change would make sea levels rise and wipe out islands. In the past few years, climate alarmists have insinuated that manmade climate change would swiftly drive […] naturalnews.com
Saved - February 19, 2024 at 2:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new complaint alleges that over half of Fani Willis' campaign contributions, totaling approximately $168,000, are linked to illegal activities such as money laundering and identity theft. The investigation reveals a complex network of illicit operations aimed at undermining the integrity of the electoral process. The complaint, supported by evidence, could have significant repercussions for Willis, including legal action and potential removal from office. Similar patterns of donation harvesting and money laundering have been observed in other states, suggesting a widespread scandal.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Over Half of Fani Willis’ Campaign Contributions Allegedly Tied to Illegal Money Laundering, New Complaint Claims Soros-funded Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is now at the center of a scandal involving her campaign finances. A new complaint filed alleges that nearly half of Willis’ campaign contributions, amounting to approximately $168,000, are linked to illegal activity, including money laundering and identity theft. The Gateway Pundit first reported Fani Willis’ money laundering network back in September 2023. A bombshell investigation has uncovered jaw-dropping connections between Fani Willis and a sprawling web of election fraud and money laundering activities. The investigation, which spans across multiple states and multiple jurisdictions, has revealed a complex network of illicit operations aimed at undermining the very foundation of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law. Sources close to the matter suggest that Willis was a massive beneficiary in the Federal and Georgia RICO enterprises. It appears that she is currently playing a key role in orchestrating a systematic scheme to manipulate election outcomes, casting doubt on the integrity of the entire electoral process. In the lead up to the 2022 midterm elections, my team uncovered a massive money laundering network of campaign finance contributions being made via ActBlue. One of the top beneficiaries of this money laundering RICO enterprise was none other than Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock. The Gateway Pundit was the first news organization to cover the massive money laundering network that financed the Raphael Warnock campaign. ADVERTISEMENT As our investigation progressed, we expanded our efforts into other states such as Missouri, Maryland, Wisconsin, Arizona, and then into every single state. Working with the Epoch Times investigative journalist Steven Kovac, we made a stunning find. Many of the top ActBlue “Contributors” never made the individual contributions. Many of these “Not Employed Individual Contributors” were the victims of a highly sophisticated money laundering scheme. The scheme was further exposed when I provided the data to James O’Keefe and his people at O’Keefe Media Group who captured many unwitting “Money Laundering Smurfs” in Maryland. This massive ongoing money laundering operation involves wire fraud, evasion of campaign finance limits, structuring of financial transactions, tax fraud, non profit fraud, identity theft, and elder abuse. The RICO operation is still in operation today. Using the identities of unwitting elderly, and other democrat voters, this massive RICO money laundering enterprise is the fuel for the entire election fraud RICO operation. The information on Fani Willis campaign contributions was obtained directly from the State of Georgia campaign finance database here: https://efile.ethics.ga.gov/#/exploreDetails/Pl-zpCz-kAajWgHI_O8eDJP4048PFnxLXRUfdOLcQk01/32/20423/371/2024 The first item we identified in the Fani Willis campaign finance report was that there were 222 contributions to her campaign that had ZERO donor information. You can check the names for yourself using the FEC campaign finance database here: https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2024&min_date=01%2F01%2F2023&max_date=12%2F31%2F2024 Peter Bernegger, a citizen investigator, made the allegations during an interview on The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson, bringing to light what many have feared: a potential widespread fraud using campaign finance systems. According to Bernegger, after an extensive review of Willis’s campaign donations, he discovered discrepancies that suggest the contributions may not be originating from the persons they purport to represent. Bernegger’s findings suggest three main issues with Willis’s fundraising: - Firstly, 220 donations lacked the required name or address information, constituting a clear violation of state law and totaling approximately $23,000. - Secondly, there were donations exceeding the $3,000 limit, amounting to another $27,000 in unlawful contributions. - The most significant allegation involves “smurfing,” a method of structured campaign money laundering, where large sums of money are divided into smaller amounts and donated to various campaigns, including Willis’s, to evade detection. Bernegger’s team alleges that over 50% of Willis’s campaign contributions were unlawfully obtained through these methods, thereby compromising the legitimacy of her elections. The term “Smurfs” refers to unwitting individuals, often seniors, whose identities are allegedly used to mask these contributions, constituting identity theft and elder financial abuse. “We are filing [Friday] under sworn oath a complaint to the Georgia State Ethics Commission against Fani Willis of $160,000 in smurfing. You add these numbers up, and we’re over 50%, at least, of all her money coming into her campaign. It was unlawful, illegally obtained, and basically, she cheated in her elections by using that money,” Bernegger announced. With Willis currently involved in high-profile legal proceedings, including the prosecution of a former president, the outcome of this complaint could have significant repercussions. The complaint, supported by data and evidence, as Bernegger emphasizes, could lead to a thorough examination by the state attorney and possibly law enforcement agencies, given the criminal nature of the allegations. As the complaint goes forward, questions are raised regarding the potential consequences for Willis. Should the allegations prove true, the response could range from legal action, including arrest and indictment, to political ramifications, such as removal from office. Investigative journalist James O’Keefe III broke his first major investigation in March 2023, since the launch of O’Keefe Media Group. The legendary journalist released a video from his investigation of the Democrat’s vast network of donation harvesters. The investigation involved: ** MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN DONATION HARVESTING ** HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL DROPS ** CROSSING NUMEROUS STATES! The Gateway Pundit has previously reported on the vast far-left network of donation harvesters as well. Chris Gleason first released the information and was first published at The Gateway Pundit back in December 2022. Chris Gleason found many “Campaign Finance Mules,” making hundreds, even thousands of donations per year. In April 2022, engineer Chris Gleason began working on his first data project involving elections.  The project was tied to the 2022 midterm election. The goal was to determine who was most likely to vote for which candidate and how likely they were to support particular candidates and causes. These “Money Mules” were not wealthy individuals. They were average Americans living in an average house in an average neighborhood.  Or at least that is how it would appear. The investigative group observed massive patterns and red flags in the data. Chris asked “active” donors what they would think if he told them that he had identified voters who were making thousands of campaign donations in an election year.  They all had the same response. “Anyone making that amount of donations is laundering money and is part of a criminal enterprise.” In the case of Raphael Warnock, he was the top beneficiary of all 2022 Democrat candidates of this money distribution scheme. Most of these smurfs are unemployed, based on the data that Gleason provided to The Gateway Pundit. Far-left NBC reported on the donations received in the Georgia runoff for Senator: Georgia Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock raised $52.2 million for his re-election between Oct. 20 through Nov. 16, more than doubling the fundraising total of his opponent, Republican Herschel Walker. Warnock, the top fundraising federal candidate of the 2022 election cycle by a long-shot, spent $39.2 million over the same period, which almost doubled Walker’s spend too. The incumbent closed the period with $29.7 million banked away. Walker still raised a significant amount over that fundraising period — $20.9 million. His campaign spent $16.5 million and closed with $9.8 million on hand. This is not a case of an outlier. This has been established in every state that they looked at. Overall, Raphael Warnock managed to receive over 358,000 donations from unemployed average Americans that totaled more than $24 million. When you start to dig into the data, you see that these same “Average American Donors” are donating thousands of times always to Democrat candidates and Democrat PACs; this is going on at a national and state level. Where did all of these “Unemployed Average Americans” get the money to make hundreds and thousands of donations to Raphael Warnock? According to Bernegger, they will also file a complaint against Warnock. “In addition to that, since we’re talking about Georgia, somebody who is probably the poster boy for this across the nation besides Joe Biden, is Warnock for Senate. He probably is the number one in all the campaign candidates that we’ve examined across the country. He is by far the number one in excess smurf donations, and we’ll be filing a complaint against him also,” he told Robinson. This smurfing is happening all around the country. In May 2023, The Gateway Pundit teamed up with social media personality and producer Tim Cramer to investigate donation harvesters in Indiana. Tim Cramer is the owner and creative director of Mosaic, a national advertising and marketing agency that works exclusively with conservative businesses, candidates, campaigns, and political special interest groups.  Tim Cramer and TGP contributor Adam Sharp recently investigated donations harvesters in Indiana. The Gateway Pundit, with help from Chris Gleason, identified hundreds of Democrat Party donations harvesters active in Indiana.  Tim and Adam recently went out and knocked on doors, and what they found was a major political scandal! Numerous individuals who were listed as Democrat Party – Act Blue donors denied making the hundreds and thousands of donations listed under their name!  These Democrat donors told Tim and Adam that THEY DID NOT make these tens of thousands of dollars in political contributions! The Gateway Pundit, with the help of Adam, went to several homes in the St. Louis, Missouri region of suspected Democrat donation harvesters.  What we found was similar to what we discovered in the other states. These homes listed as giving hundreds or thousands of donations to Democrat candidates either refuted the number of donations or denied the person was even living at the address! It is not just Fani Willis and Raphael Warnock. Chris Gleason investigated Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s other donors. What he found was similar to what The Gateway Pundit reported in several Democrat races. A major segment of donations came from donation harvesters. Many of these people are retired and unemployed. They are donating thousands of times to Democrats around the country. This is likely the largest political donations scandal in US history, and it is about to bust open. What we found at The Gateway Pundit was that these “contributors” follow a very similar pattern that we have witnessed in all of the states as a part of this RICO enterprise of money laundering, identity theft, fraud, elder abuse, etc. The Gateway Pundit has reported on Democrat donation harvesters in Maryland, Georgia, Missouri, Washington, Michigan, and New York. You can read more of these stories here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/?s=donation+mule

Georgia Campaign Finance System CFIS efile.ethics.ga.gov
Browse Individual contributions - FEC.gov Explore current and historic federal campaign finance data on the new fec.gov. Look at totals and trends, and see how candidates and committees raise and spend money. When you find what you need, export results and save custom links. fec.gov
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 2:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The gut's enteric nervous system, often referred to as the "second brain," is composed of neurons and glial cells. Glial cells, once thought to be passive, are now recognized for their active roles in digestion, nutrient absorption, blood flow, and immune responses. Recent studies have identified new subsets of glial cells that sense food and regulate gut contractions. Understanding the diverse roles of enteric glia could lead to the development of treatments for gastrointestinal disorders. Glial cells are also implicated in gut pain and various diseases, making them potential targets for therapies.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Unpicking the Mystery of the Body’s ‘Second Brain’ Sitting alongside the neurons in your enteric nervous system are underappreciated glial cells, which play key roles in digestion and disease that scientists are only just starting to understand. From the moment you swallow a bite of food to the moment it exits your body, the gut is toiling to process this strange outside material. It has to break chunks down into small bits. It must distinguish healthy nutrients from toxins or pathogens and absorb only what is beneficial. And it does all this while moving the partially processed food one way through different factories of digestion—mouth, esophagus, stomach, through the intestines and out. “Digestion is required for survival,” said Marissa Scavuzzo, a postdoctoral researcher at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio. “We do it every day, but also, if you really think about it, it sounds very foreign and alien.” Breaking down food requires coordination across dozens of cell types and many tissues—from muscle cells and immune cells to blood and lymphatic vessels. Heading this effort is the gut’s very own network of nerve cells, known as the enteric nervous system, which weaves through the intestinal walls from the esophagus down to the rectum. This network can function nearly independently from the brain; indeed, its complexity has earned it the nickname “the second brain.” And just like the brain, it’s made up of two kinds of nervous system cells: neurons and glia. Glia, once thought to be mere glue that fills the space between neurons, were largely ignored in the brain for much of the 20th century. Clearly, neurons were the cells that made things happen: Through electrical and chemical signaling, they materialize our thoughts, feelings and actions. But in the past few decades, glia have shed their identity as passive servants. Neuroscientists have increasingly discovered that glia play physiological roles in the brain and nervous system that once seemed reserved for neurons. A similar glial reckoning is now happening in the gut. A number of studies have pointed to the varied active roles that enteric glia play in digestion, nutrient absorption, blood flow, and immune responses. Others reveal the diversity of glial cells that exist in the gut, and how each type may fine-tune the system in previously unknown ways. One recent study, not yet peer-reviewed, has identified a new subset of glial cells that senses food as it moves through the digestive tract, signaling to the gut tissue to contract and move it along its way. Enteric glia “seem to be sitting at the interface of a lot of different tissue types and biological processes,” said Seyedeh Faranak Fattahi, an assistant professor of cellular molecular pharmacology at the University of California, San Francisco. They’re “connecting a lot of dots between different physiological roles.” They’re now being linked to specific gastrointestinal disorders and pain symptoms. Understanding the different roles they play in the gut could be critical for developing treatments, Scavuzzo said. “Hopefully, this is like the beginning of the glial-cell renaissance in the gut.” Glia Do Everything Scientists have known about enteric glia for more than a century, but until recently no one had tools for studying them. Researchers could examine neurons by picking up the action potentials they fire. But compared to neurons, glial cells are electrophysiologically “boring,” said Brian Gulbransen, an associate professor of neuroscience at Michigan State University. Aside from a few reports that pointed to their roles in maintaining healthy gut tissue, they remained understudied and underappreciated. That changed over the past decade or so. New tools that allow scientists to manipulate gene activity in glia or visualize them in different ways have “dramatically changed the way we look at the enteric nervous system,” said Keith Sharkey, a professor of physiology and pharmacology at the University of Calgary. For example, calcium imaging, a method Gulbransen developed while he was a postdoctoral researcher in Sharkey’s lab, allowed them to analyze glial activity by tracking calcium levels within cells. Thanks to some of these newer technologies, scientists now know that enteric glia are among the first responders to injury or inflammation in gut tissue. They help maintain the gut’s barrier to keep toxins out. They mediate the contractions of the gut that allow food to flow through the digestive tract. Glia regulate stem cells in the gut’s outer layer, and are critical for tissue regeneration. They chat with the microbiome, neurons, and immune-system cells, managing and coordinating their functions. “We think that they do everything,” Gulbransen said. “The more that people find out about them, it’s less surprising that they do these diverse roles.” They can also move between roles. They’ve been shown to change their identities, shifting from one glial cell type to another, in lab dishes—a useful ability in the ever-changing gut environment. They’re “so dynamic, endowed with the functional capacity to do so many different things, sitting in this incredibly fluctuating and complex environment,” Scavuzzo said. Even as excitement builds about glia in the enteric nervous system, scientists like Scavuzzo have fairly basic questions still to work out—such as how many types of enteric glia even exist. A Force to Reckon With Scavuzzo became fascinated with digestion in childhood when she witnessed her mother’s medical troubles due to a congenitally shortened esophagus. Watching her mother go through gastrointestinal complications compelled Scavuzzo to study the gut in adulthood to find treatments for patients like her mom. “I grew up knowing and understanding this stuff is important,” she said. “The more we know, we can intervene better.” In 2019, when Scavuzzo started her postdoctoral research at Case Western under Paul Tesar, a world expert in glial biology, she knew she wanted to unravel the diversity of enteric glia. As the only scientist in Tesar’s lab examining the gut and not the brain, she often joked with her colleagues that she was studying the more complex organ. The first year, she struggled massively in trying to map out the individual cells in the gut, which proved to be a harsh research environment. The very start of the small intestine, the duodenum, where she focused her studies, was especially tough. The bile and digestive juices of the duodenum degraded RNA, the genetic material that held clues to the cells’ identities, making it nearly impossible to extract. Over the next few years, however, she developed new methods to work on the delicate system. Those methods allowed her to get the “first glimpse into the diversity of these glial cells” across all tissues of the duodenum, Scavuzzo said. In June, in a paper published on the http://Biorxiv.org preprint server that has not yet been peer-reviewed, she reported her team’s discovery of six subtypes of glial cells, including one that they named “hub cells.” Hub cells express genes for a mechanosensory channel called PIEZO2—a membrane protein that can sense force and is typically found in tissues that respond to physical touch. Other researchers recently found PIEZO2 present in some gut neurons; the channel allows neurons to sense food in the intestines and move it along. Scavuzzo hypothesized that glial hub cells can also sense force and instruct other gut cells to contract. She found evidence that these hub cells existed not only in the duodenum, but also in the ileum and colon, which suggests they’re likely regulating motility throughout the digestive tract. She deleted PIEZO2 from enteric glia hub cells in mice, which she thought would make the cells lose the ability to sense force. She was right: Gut motility slowed, and food contents built up in the stomach. But the effect was subtle, which reflects the fact that other cells are also playing a role in physically moving partially digested food through the intestine, Scavuzzo said. It’s possible that each involved cell type could regulate a different type of contraction, she suggested—“or they could just be additional mechanisms that organisms evolved to make sure we could keep digesting our foods to stay alive.” There are likely many fail-safes in digestion because it’s such an important process, she added. The experiment offered clear evidence that, in addition to other cells, “glial cells can also sense physical forces” through this mechanosensory channel, said Vassilis Pachnis, the head of the nervous system development and homeostasis laboratory at the Francis Crick Institute. Then, having sensed the change in force, they can shift the activity of neural circuits to trigger muscular contractions. “It’s a wonderful piece of work,” he said. Hub cells are only one of many glial subtypes that play functional roles in the gut. Scavuzzo’s new six subtypes, added to those characterized in previous research, together reveal 14 known subgroups of glia across the duodenum, ileum, and colon. More are likely to be discovered in coming years, each with new potential to better explain how digestion works and enable researchers to develop treatments for a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. A Pain in the Gut Gastrointestinal diseases often come with a dose of pain, in addition to disruptive digestive issues. Eating the wrong food, or too much of the right one, can cause a stomachache. Those gut feelings are driven by enteric nerve cells, including glia. Because glia are now known to control the activity of immune cells, they are suspected to play a role in many gastrointestinal disorders and diseases, making them good potential targets for treatments. Several years ago, Pachnis and his group found that glia are among the first cell types to respond to injury or inflammation in the mouse gut, and that tampering with enteric glial cells can also create an inflammatory response. In the gut glia seem to perform roles similar to those of true immune cells, Pachnis said, and so their dysfunction can lead to chronic autoimmune disorders and inflammatory bowel diseases, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. “Glial cells definitely play a role in the initiation, the pathogenesis, and the progression of the various diseases of the gut,” he said. Glia are likely involved because of their central role in communicating between the microbiome, immune cells, and other gut cells. Healthy glia strengthen the intestines’ epithelial barrier, a layer of cells that keeps out toxins and pathogens and absorbs nutrients. But in patients with Crohn’s disease, glial cells don’t function properly, resulting in a weaker barrier and inappropriate immune response. “Different subtypes of glia can be functioning differently or dysfunctioning in a wide range of diseases and disorders where motility is impacted,” Scavuzzo said. They have also been linked to neural inflammation, hypersensitivity in the organs and even neuron death. For instance, Gulbransen and his team recently discovered that glia contribute to gut pain by secreting molecules that sensitize neurons. This is likely an adaptive response intended to draw the gut’s attention to damaging substances to dispose of them, Gulbransen said, which as a side effect causes pain. The findings, published today in Science Signaling, suggest that targeting glia could help alleviate some of the pain created by inflammatory disorders of the gut. Glia themselves can also become stressed by genetic problems, exposure to metabolites from the microbiome, bad diet, or other factors. Fattahi has observed that, no matter the cause, stressed enteric glia influence the entire tissue, and sometimes even damage neighboring neurons or recruit immune cells, causing additional inflammation and pain. These new studies in enteric glia will go a long way toward explaining many gastrointestinal disorders that researchers have struggled to understand and treat, Sharkey said. “I’m really excited to see how these cells have evolved to become central figures in enteric neurobiology over the years.” It’s becoming ever clearer that the neuron doesn’t act alone in the enteric system, he added. “It’s got these beautiful partners in glia that really allow it to do its thing in the most efficient and effective way.” @ScottAdamsSays https://www.wired.com/story/gut-second-brain-health-glial-cells-digestion-disease-pain/

bioRxiv.org - the preprint server for Biology bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution biorxiv.org
Unpicking the Mystery of the Body’s ‘Second Brain’ Sitting alongside the neurons in your enteric nervous system are underappreciated glial cells, which play key roles in digestion and disease that scientists are only just starting to understand. wired.com
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 2:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists have developed a new method to destroy cancer cells using vibrating molecules. By stimulating aminocyanine molecules with near-infrared light, the membranes of cancer cells can be broken apart. This approach, called molecular jackhammers, is faster and more effective than previous methods. The use of near-infrared light allows for deeper penetration into the body, potentially treating cancer in bones and organs without surgery. Initial tests on lab-grown cancer cells and mice with melanoma tumors have shown promising results, with a 99% hit rate and half the animals becoming cancer-free. This research provides a new way to treat cancer using mechanical forces at the molecular scale.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Scientists Destroy 99% of Cancer Cells in The Lab Using Vibrating Molecules Scientists have discovered a new way to destroy cancer cells. Stimulating aminocyanine molecules with near-infrared light caused them to vibrate in sync, enough to break apart the membranes of cancer cells. Aminocyanine molecules are already used in bioimaging as synthetic dyes. Commonly used in low doses to detect cancer, they stay stable in water and are very good at attaching themselves to the outside of cells. The research team from Rice University, Texas A&M University, and the University of Texas, says the new approach is a marked improvement over another kind of cancer-killing molecular machine previously developed, called Feringa-type motors, which could also break the structures of problematic cells. "It is a whole new generation of molecular machines that we call molecular jackhammers," says chemist James Tour from Rice University. "They are more than one million times faster in their mechanical motion than the former Feringa-type motors, and they can be activated with near-infrared light rather than visible light." The use of near-infrared light is important because it enables scientists to get deeper into the body. Cancer in bones and organs could potentially be treated without needing surgery to get to the cancer growth. In tests on cultured, lab-grown cancer cells, the molecular jackhammer method scored a 99 percent hit rate at destroying the cells. The approach was also tested on mice with melanoma tumors, and half the animals became cancer-free. The structure and chemical properties of aminocyanine molecules mean they stay in sync with the right stimulus – such as near-infrared light. When in motion, the electrons inside the molecules form what's known as plasmons, collectively vibrating entities that drive movement across the whole of the molecule. "What needs to be highlighted is that we've discovered another explanation for how these molecules can work," says chemist Ciceron Ayala-Orozco from Rice University. "This is the first time a molecular plasmon is utilized in this way to excite the whole molecule and to actually produce mechanical action used to achieve a particular goal – in this case, tearing apart cancer cells' membrane." The plasmons have an arm on one side, helping to connect the molecules to the cancer cell membranes while the movements of the vibrations bash them apart. It's still early days for the research, but these initial findings are very promising. This is also the kind of straightforward, biomechanical technique that cancer cells would find it hard to evolve some sort of blockade against. Next, the researchers are looking at other types of molecules that can be used similarly "This study is about a different way to treat cancer using mechanical forces at the molecular scale," says Ayala-Orozco. The research has been published in Nature Chemistry. @ScottAdamsSays https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-destroy-99-of-cancer-cells-in-the-lab-using-vibrating-molecules

Scientists Destroy 99% of Cancer Cells in The Lab Using Vibrating Molecules Scientists have discovered a new way to destroy cancer cells. sciencealert.com
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 3:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A pilot plant in Texas is using desk-sized turbines to generate 10 MW of power, enough to supply 10,000 homes. The turbines use supercritical carbon dioxide, which is more energy efficient than steam. By changing the working fluid, the turbines can be significantly downsized. Additionally, the use of concentrated solar power to reach the supercritical state of carbon dioxide could reduce costs. This innovative approach has the potential to revolutionize power generation.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Texas plant to generate 10 MW of power with desk-sized turbines Working with supercritical carbon dioxide is highly advantageous and could change how we look at steam turbines forever. A turbine the size of a regular office desk could soon power 10,000 households, as per a press release from the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), which has set up a pilot plant in San Antonio, Texas. Called the Supercritical Transformational Electric Power (STEP), the demo pilot plant has seen the SwRI collaborate with GTI Energy, GE Vernova (GE), and the US Department of Energy. The steam turbines used in power plants worldwide are entirely a dated technology. The origins of the steam turbine go back to the 19th century and have not seen radical improvements in technology, even as one can find steam turbines in varying sizes and applications. The turbine's job is to use water as a thermal medium in power cycles. However, if one were to change the medium itself, the turbine could be much smaller in size. Enter carbon dioxide as a working fluid, and the turbines can be significantly downsized. Supercritical CO2 turbines Carbon dioxide exists in a gaseous form, but it can also be concentrated using high temperature and pressure, where it behaves like a gas but with the density of a liquid. Called supercritical CO2 (sCO2), this gas form has been on the US Department of Energy's (DOE) radar for a while since it allows the turbines to be as much as 10 percent more energy efficient than conventional turbines. Moreover, a three-foot (one-meter) turbine using sCO2 can perform the same job as a 65-foot (20 m) steam turbine, paving the way for a significant downsizing of the turbine. From the bus-sized turbines used today, one could transition to a golf cart or even a desk-sized sCO2 turbine. The STEP aims to make that possibility a reality, and a 10 MW demo pilot is being developed with $155 million in funding at SwRI's headquarters in Texas. That would be enough to power 10,000 homes. Working with solar concentration An added advantage of using sCO2 is the ability to take the gas to its supercritical state using concentrated solar power. This approach uses a system of mirrors to focus solar energy and use it for various purposes ranging from heating to power generation. According to CleanTechnica, the DOE has been working over the years to reduce the cost of concentrating solar power systems with limited success. Using sCO2 could drastically reduce the costs, providing a win-win situation for the two approaches. @ScottAdamsSays https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/desk-sized-turbines-power-10000-homes

Texas plant to generate 10 MW of power with desk-sized turbines Above a critical temperature, carbon dioxide behaves like a gas but has the density of a liquid making it an ideal thermal medium. interestingengineering.com
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 4:43 PM

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Wenstrup revealed new allegations that Dr. Fauci went to CIA Headquarters to “influence” its COVID-19 origins investigation. Whistleblower alleges that 6 analysts were offered significant financial incentives ⁦@ScottAdamsSays⁩

Wenstrup Reveals New Allegations that Dr. Fauci Potentially Influenced CIA COVID-19 Origins Investigation - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov
View Full Interactive Feed