TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @OwenShroyer1776
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
This is from 43 years ago when liberals and Democrats were using the same fear campaign to push the "climate change agenda". Everything the climate alarmist have predicted has been proven wrong. Yet they are still pushing the same lies. https://t.co/tlmmSzLd0X
Video Transcript AI Summary
Concern about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of coal and oil. And in recent months, as David Culhane reports, research has uncovered facts to support that theory.
Many scientists claim that the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere has been rising over the past one hundred years, that the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that the sea level has been rising with increasing swiftness over the past forty years. If these scientists are correct, about 25% of Florida would be flooded along with low lying areas all over the world. Climate changes could produce widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be too dry, and the wheat and corn crops would have to move to Canada.
Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet. It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to filter down and warm the earth. But like the glass of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat so that it cannot rise into space. The scientists maintain that the coal, oil, and gas we've been burning for a hundred years have produced more and more carbon dioxide and helped overheat the earth.
Now some political leaders endorse the demands for more c o two monitoring stations, like this one in Hawaii, and they share the anger of the scientists at Reagan administration budget cuts at a time when they feel closer to getting definitive answers.
We are not doing the kind of research that we should be doing to determine whether or not these scientists who are so alarmed are correct in their assessment.
And what they find out will affect the lives and fortunes of millions of people, the very survival of cities like this one. David Culhane, CBS News, New York.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Concern about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of coal and oil. And in recent months, as David Culhane reports, research has uncovered facts to support that theory.
Speaker 1: Many scientists claim that the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere has been rising over the past one hundred years, that the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that the sea level has been rising with increasing swiftness over the past forty years. If these scientists are correct, about 25% of Florida would be flooded along with low lying areas all over the world. Climate changes could produce widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be too dry, and the wheat and corn crops would have to move to Canada.
Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet. It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to filter down and warm the earth. But like the glass of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat so that it cannot rise into space. The scientists maintain that the coal, oil, and gas we've been burning for a hundred years have produced more and more carbon dioxide and helped overheat the earth.
Now some political leaders endorse the demands for more c o two monitoring stations, like this one in Hawaii, and they share the anger of the scientists at Reagan administration budget cuts at a time when they feel closer to getting definitive answers.
Speaker 2: We are not doing the kind of research that we should be doing to determine whether or not these scientists who are so alarmed are correct in their assessment.
Speaker 1: And what they find out will affect the lives and fortunes of millions of people, the very survival of cities like this one. David Culhane, CBS News, New York.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
WHAT DID GEORGE ZINN KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT https://t.co/cdnyc3vS6L
@guerre1889 - Nom De Guerre
@OwenShroyer1776 This video explains it. It's so obvious. 😂 https://t.co/glDP5sXDSL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Three myths are claimed about Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Myth 1: there is no exit wound. The official story says Charlie was shot with a 30-06 caliber round from a Mauser model 98 bolt-action rifle; the round entering at the base of the skull on the right and exiting the left side of his neck, with the body absorbing the round. Visual and audio evidence are said to contradict this, rendering the myth. Myth 2: Tyler Robinson is the killer. If the weapon and caliber are wrong, a rifle with DNA on a towel becomes irrelevant; Robinson has not confessed, but retyped text messages are cited; he was never seen holding the weapon. Myth 3: there is no evidence it was Israel. Taber and Zinn are Jewish; Shaffer group from Israel; Netanyahu’s obsession; a private jet transponder-off near the shooting; NSA detected Israeli signatures; FBI-ADL ties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the three myths of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Myth number one says that there is no exit wound. The official story is that Charlie was shot with a 30 odd six caliber round from a Mauser model 98 bolt action rifle. Here is what a 30 odd six round does to a ballistics dummy, piercing completely through the dummy as well as the two by four behind it. Multiple angles and slow motion footage show that Kirk was shot from behind and to the right.
The round entering at the base of the skull on the right and exiting the left side of his neck. The official narrative is that Charlie's body miraculously absorbed the round with no exit wound. However, all the visual footage and audio would make no sense, rendering this a myth. Myth number two is that Tyler Robinson is the killer. If the weapon and caliber is wrong, then finding a rifle with DNA on a towel is irrelevant.
Robinson has not confessed of the crime, but we were given retyped text messages as evidence. Robinson was never seen holding that weapon, even in photos prior to the shooting. If it's the wrong gun, it's the wrong suspect, and the real killer is at large. Myth number three, there is no evidence that it was Israel. Two patsies connected to the shooting, Taber and Zinn, are both Jewish.
Charlie's security, the Shaffer group, was said by Kirk to be from Israel. The founder of the group is a Zionist, and they are in possession of the camera footage from behind Charlie's head. Netanyahu has a bizarre obsession with the shooting, which has led to multiple tweets and interviews calling the accusation against Israel insane. A Jewish owned private jet turned off its transponder right after and near the shooting, which is illegal. The NSA detected Israeli cell phone signatures near the shooting.
There are dozens of verified testimonies that Kirk was turning on Israel's war efforts at a time when Israel wants to drag America into another war Iran. The FBI works closely with Israel in the ADL. Not only does the FBI buy snooping software from Israel, they maintain offices that are within walking distance of the ADL in many major cities. Their key focus has been tracking anti Semites for decades and not going after far left extremism. Only an illogical person would say there is no evidence it is Israel when there is a multitude of evidence that points to their involvement, from the distraction to the motive to their very close ties to the FBI.
Be sure to like, share, and follow for more. Truth nuke.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
WHAT DID GEORGE ZINN KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT https://t.co/cdnyc3vS6L
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
WHAT DID GEORGE ZINN KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT https://t.co/cdnyc3vS6L
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
No, I can't stop thinking about it. They killed Charlie right in front of us. It feels like part of a dark trend our country is in. Another move in the collapse of a once Proud & United Country. Another major event & no one trusts the story. I don't like it or where it's going. https://t.co/Kiy4KNRHu6
Video Transcript AI Summary
On the Charlie Kirk assassination coverage, the speaker asks, "Do you believe the official story? If you do, then fine." He argues if you doubt it, you understand why the coverage matters—the biggest political assassination in our generation, and, in his view, "the biggest political assassination in modern American history" with questions not being answered. He says conservatives must consider safety and security, noting it's been worse since 2016. He states, "I'm not here to fight. This isn't a fight. I'm just covering the biggest news story, calling it as I see it." He admits it's hard to move on; more questions persist, and he "anticipate[s] the coverage going away" only when a clear picture emerges, "until the basic questions are asked and answered." He likens it to JFK for those not alive, asserts he's sound, and hopes for peace and closure while continuing coverage or shifting to other topics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's up, guys? Beautiful Saturday evening here in Austin, Texas, and wanted to hop on here and address some things that I'm seeing in regards to my continued coverage of the Charlie Kirk assassination. And, you know, I guess I would just start with this. Do you believe the official story? If you do, then fine.
Then fine. Move on. You don't have to look at my coverage. But if you don't, then you understand why this is such a big deal. And I don't know why you wouldn't want people to continue asking questions, especially if you don't trust the government, which is probably a good mindset to have.
And this is the biggest political assassination in our generation. So yeah, I want basic questions asked and answered and we're not getting them. So it's funny that people are calling me crazy, but to me, you're crazy. You're crazy if you trust the government. You're crazy if you don't want answers to the biggest political assassination in modern American history.
To me to me, that makes you crazy, that you wouldn't want to know this stuff, that you wouldn't want to be informed, you wouldn't want to understand what's going on in the world around you. I don't think that makes me crazy, I think that makes you crazy. But here we are. So I guess we're supposed to just go back to normal and, you know, I guess eventually you have to, no matter what happens in life, the big losses, the big tragedies, successes, eventually you go back to whatever's considered normal. I guess in this case, just covering other news and getting to other topics.
You do have to do that and I do intend to do that, But it just it's just been hard. It's been hard to get back to normal with this, especially when I don't even feel like we're getting the truth. And right now, if you're a conservative in the public space, you have to be thinking about safety and security now more than ever. And this is something we've been dealing with since 2016. And now here we are 2025, and it's worse than ever.
So yeah, that's a big issue for me. And I think it's a big issue for the public as well. So I see, you know, people want to fight over this. I see people fighting over this and fighting over the different coverage and commentary and everything. You know, I'm not trying to fight with anybody.
I I don't understand the whole fighting thing. I'm not I'm not here to fight. This isn't a fight. I'm just covering the biggest news story, what I believe is the biggest news story right now. And I'm just I'm just covering it, calling it as I see it, covering it in in the way that I would want others to cover it.
So I just don't understand the fighting. I don't understand why it's considered crazy to want the truth from your government, especially with such a big event with this and the backdrop and how it feels like it's just part of something much larger. So, you know, having said that, I understand why people are upset that I keep posting about it and sharing the videos. I understand that. And believe me, I've wanted to move on myself to an extent.
I'm, you know, I'm kind of sick over it too. But there just keeps being more questions not answered, more concerns, more strangeness, more oddities, and still no trust, at least from my perspective of our government. And so, yeah, I do intend on moving on and eventually we'll all move on and I pray for nothing but peace and safety this weekend and maybe we can get a little closure. But until the basic questions are asked and answered, which I don't think is going to happen in the near future, I imagine the coverage will persist. So, you know, if people are sick of seeing it and want me to start covering other things, Perhaps I can make that leap, make that intellectual hurdle to cover other things.
And quite frankly, need to. It's just been very difficult. But until we have a clear picture of what happened here, I anticipate the coverage going away. And at this point it does feel like it's our JFK for those that weren't alive for that. Now, I just want to say this, just to be clear, I'm very sound of mind, I'm very sound of body, I'm very blessed, I'm very happy, I'm very I love life.
Everything is great. I'm not in a dark place in any way, shape, or form. I'm covering news. That's what I do for a living. And the news just happens to be some of the darkest news we've ever had to witness.
But but life is still good. God is still good. You know, don't let this, don't let this bring you down. That's not the intent. It's not what I'm trying to do.
Just just covering this because it just feels so big. It just feels so big. It is so big, and it feels like it's just part of something that's even bigger. So we'll see if we can make that hurdle and start covering some other things. I do intend to.
It's just hard. It's just hard to go back to normal because I don't think there is normal anymore. And maybe that's what it is. So God bless. Godspeed.
Hope you're having a great weekend, and we'll talk again soon.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
Here's your Congress, in a foreign nation, under a foreign nation's flag. Why? https://t.co/sVSc4mr5X1
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
FBI Director Patel says they have a note as evidence confirming the shooter even though the note doesn't exist. What? This just keeps getting weirder and worse. https://t.co/XlcAM6Kd0G
Video Transcript AI Summary
The governor said yesterday there was a written note before the assassination attempt, and what did it say? The spokesperson stated the note did exist and there is evidence of its contents: 'I, the suspect wrote a note saying, I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it.' The note was written before the shooting and was located in the suspect and partner's home. But we have since learned that the note, even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note, and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Written note was a did he write a written note before, before the assassination attempt? That's what the governor said yesterday. And what did that say if you could
Speaker 1: change able to say I'm sorry. So what I was what I'm able to say is I I I addressed it partially earlier is that the written note, we believe, what did exist, and we have evidence to show what was in that note, which is, and I'm going to, summarize basically saying, I, the suspect wrote a note saying, I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it. That note was written before the shooting. Evidence of existence, we now have learned existed before the shooting was in the location, in the suspect and partner's home. But we have since learned that the note, even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note, and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
Latest Update On Kirk Assassination: https://t.co/QcD1FkgBYq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Law enforcement update on the assassination of Charlie Kirk notes new information but many questions remain. Authorities point toward a left-wing political assassination tied to Kirk’s right‑wing views, especially on transgender issues. Circumstantial evidence includes the timing—shot after the transgender issue was raised; bystanders celebrating for cameras; internet chatter suggesting prior knowledge or planning of a political hit. It’s described as potentially a professional job and premeditated, with a shot to the jugular; the possibility of master shots or a trans military ban is mentioned but deemed unlikely. The narrator says two things can be true: leftist activists could be framed by a professional hitman. Public trust in government is low; there have been conflicting statements from FBI and local law enforcement about custody. There are reports of celebratory reactions from liberals on mainstream media and campuses; the speaker calls it a dark day and promises more updates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. So we get our first law enforcement update today regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And while there is some new relevant information, there's obviously a lot of questions that still remain. Now law enforcement is pointing in the direction of a political assassination coming from the left against Charlie Kirk because of his right wing political beliefs, specifically on the transgender issue. Now there's a lot of circumstantial evidence to back this up.
The shot was taken right after the transgender issue was brought up. The shot was taken right after the transgender school shooting issue even was brought up. So it was very specific. I don't think the timing of that is a coincidence. You also had a bunch of people there that seemed to have prior knowledge that this was gonna happen as they began celebrating for the cameras right after the shot was taken.
These individuals need to be brought into questioning. There was also a lot of Internet activity before the event that points to some people in chat rooms basically indicating that either something was gonna happen at the event and they had prior knowledge to it, or they were planning to do something at the event that they were going to pull it off as a political hit. So there's a lot of circumstantial evidence out there that you can point to and say, yes. This this does look like left wing political violence, and the trans issue looks to be what it's centered around. So I I do think we can look at that and the trends with that and say, okay.
There is definitely a a real a real possibility that that's what this is, and maybe that that's all that this is. But that's not all that there is. This looks like a professional job, and I think that it's an unavoidable conversation that we have to have. Political violence is up, and quite frankly, geopolitical violence is up. And when you see somebody have a perfectly clean shot right to the jugular and when you see a assassination that is clearly premeditated where the shooter has the ability to escape the scene of the crime without being caught, without being noticed, that screams premeditation.
That screams professional job. Now let's not forget that there could be people that have been affected by the trans military ban. So there could be there could be master shots out there. There could be expert shots out there that could maybe take that shot and maybe could have planned that whole thing out. But it seems that seems unlikely.
It seems like it was a professional job, and it seems like the purpose was to have it as as bloody and gory and disturbing as possible with the shot to the neck. So it's it does seem like a professional hit. There is the circumstantial evidence of of prior knowledge from these leftists, but two things can still be true at once. And so we don't need to get into all the different ways that both of these things can be true, but but I would say that you could have a bunch of leftist trans activists kinda wound up to take the fall for this framed against them when a professional hitman comes in and actually takes the shot and does the job, and then they just think it was them, and then everybody else thinks it was them. So there's no doubt that there's a real possibility there.
Now the problem we have is nobody trusts the government. And even for conservatives and right wingers and fans of Charlie Kirk who obviously support Donald Trump and and trust this administration more than the last, we still just can't trust government. And I've covered these things so many times, and one of the big telltale signs that something is going wrong is when local law enforcement and federal law enforcement have different things that they're saying right out of the gates. And that happened yesterday with suspects being arrested and released, some saying the suspected shooter, others saying no. So you had the FBI saying we have the suspected shooter in custody, then you had local law enforcement saying, no.
We don't. Now that could just be because they're all trying to get something done and speak to the public as much as possible, so mistakes can be made. But regardless, just nobody trusts the government. Nobody trusts the government. And we've had so many cover ups in recent years.
We've had cover ups decades ago. This reeks of Butler two point o, premeditated, gets on the roof, takes the shot, doesn't get stopped, and then no and then we know nothing. But nobody trusts the government. It comes out, you know, we're get we had lied to for all the years about JFK. We still don't even know what happens at the Vegas shooting.
And so now we're just sitting here in the wake of it, in the memory of that gruesome video knowing that there's a killer on the loose, a political assassin potentially on the loose, professional hitmen running around waiting to take out the next political target. It's really dark. And then the left is celebrating it. They're not even hiding it anymore, folks. They were all on the mainstream media last night celebrating it.
You have all these liberals on college campuses celebrating it. It's beyond disturbing. And so here's where we are. Now there's some other things I'm gonna report on this coming up later about the general direction of political violence and some of the some of the other things that are out there. I'm gonna I'm gonna not report on it for this video, but maybe a video later when we get some some other developments on this or tomorrow if we have a clearer picture.
But it truly is a dark day in America. All the things that we have to talk about, all the things that we have to consider from from this incident and and my reporting here just show it it's it's really a dark day. So, you know, I hope Charlie's family and and the Turning Point people can find some sort of peace in all of this, but I can't imagine how right now. I can't imagine how. So god bless Charlie and his family.
And then I don't know. I don't I don't I don't see our nation getting any closer to healing after this, unfortunately.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
Why I Am Leaving Infowars https://t.co/7vnXGwmSrs
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
They're hemorrhaging badly. It's undeniable. I haven't gotten a text from Team Trump since the election, but today they're mass texting about Obama. Until Deep State Arrests happen, no one cares, except the cheerleaders and paid propagandists. Worst botched cover up of all time. https://t.co/VjJcRbSJJx
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
What the hell is wrong with Trump? https://t.co/NZJl8Gw7Md
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's recent Truth Social post calling the Jeffrey Epstein story a hoax signals he's moving on from his original supporters, labeling them "bad people." This shift, coupled with the Iran strikes and Elon Musk fallout, has caused his approval rating to decline.
Trump's age and health may become a bigger issue, with increased makeup use being noted. The speaker questions if Trump wants scrutiny on figures like Howard Lutnick, Larry Silverstein, and Cash Patel, and a potentially damaging story about a congressman.
The speaker suggests Dan Bongino may leave the administration to preserve his reputation. While still grateful for Trump's past actions, the speaker believes the Epstein post indicates he no longer values their support. The speaker concludes that Trump will not drain the swamp or expose the Epstein-Maxwell operation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, by now, you've likely seen president Trump's latest truth social post basically saying the Jeffrey Epstein story is a hoax, and those that are still talking about it are, from yesterday's comments, bad people and now his past supporters. So this is like Hillary calling us deplorables. This is president Trump basically signaling to his base, his original supporters that have been with him since 2015, that he's moving on. At least that's how I take it. So the people that have been fighting with him since 2015, the people that were in the streets for him, the people that were in prison for him, he's moved on from us.
And so now we're his past supporters, we're hoaxers, we're bad people. And this Epstein post now is the worst yet. Nobody can seem to make any sense of it. The only conclusion I can land on at this time is that, again, he's just decided he's moved on from us, and he's gonna work with the political establishment now. He's gonna work with the neocons now.
He's gonna be working with the warmongers now, and he has a new base of supporters, not his original supporters, but the new MAGA that popped up in 2024 that will just support him no matter what. So that's what the message reads to me aside from just the tone deaf nature of it with the Epstein story and not being able to read the room properly. That's how this message reads to me. Now his approval rating will hit an all time low by the end of the week. This slide began after the Iran strikes, and really that's when things started to go sideways.
With the Iran strikes and then the Elon Musk fallout over not getting the doze results, and then the big beautiful bill, dirty salesman techniques and now the Epstein, I don't know, cover up, whatever you wanna call it. Now his approval rating will be at an all time low and it all started with the Iran strikes And we saw it all coming. You know, we saw it going sideways and we were attacked. And so now now here we are. It's very unfortunate.
Now we could talk about what could happen in the midterms. I think we all kinda see where this is trending, but we'll we'll not talk about for that that for now. I think what's gonna start happening is Trump's age and health is be gonna is gonna become a big story. And I will just say this, he's wearing more makeup than he normally does, including on his hands now. He's wearing makeup on his hands for whatever reason.
So things are just getting weird, and I just don't understand why president Trump would do this. It doesn't make any sense to anybody. Like, do you really want us to start talking about what else is going on in the administration? Do you really want us to start talking about Howard Lutnick and his relations with Epstein and being his neighbor and Larry Silverstein in September 11? Like, do do you really want us to go there?
Do you really want us to start talking about Cash Patel and the new FBI jet by the way, you know, I don't I don't scoop other people's stories. And who knows? Maybe Trump is trying to throw people off the scent of this other story out of DC that's about to break big that I know you're trying to bury right now about a certain congressman. I know you're trying to bury it. It's not gonna happen.
I know for a fact you're not gonna be able to buy this story off. It will come out, and it could implicate Cash Patel and others. And it's gonna be bad about a very popular congressman. And and some stuff has started to leak in both of these instances, but this is now where it's gonna go. And the people that would ride or die with you and and make sure that these stories don't become the big news and distract from what you're doing, now they will.
Now these will be the big stories, and and we'll be forced to cover them because we're not winning. And now you've just decided to throw us overboard. So I don't know what you expect people to do at this point, but it's gonna be bad. And I would be shocked at this point if Dan Bongino lasts much longer. I think Dan Bongino is going to have the same realization that Jen Psaki had, which is the longer I stick around this administration, the worse my integrity looks and the harder it's gonna be for me to have a career in the political media when I'm done here.
I think Bongino is gonna realize that if he hasn't already, and I'd be I'd be stunned if he lasts much longer after all of this. However he feels about it or Trump, I I just think he's gonna realize self preservation. I've gotta get out of here. Now, I don't regret voting for president Trump. I don't regret supporting president Trump, and I'll always be grateful for president Trump for freeing innocent people from prison and for pardoning me and all the great things that he's done.
But I just feel like we've we've crossed the point of no return now. And to me, this latest post is he's over us. He's done. He doesn't care about our support anymore. He's got new people he's wanting to ride with now, and it's not us.
And to do it over the Epstein story is a strange phenomenon, but now the fallout is inevitable. I don't know if he's getting bad advice. I don't know if he's just unable to read the room anymore. I don't know if maybe it's an age thing or a health thing, but this is clearly where it's going, and it's a bad direction. And so I think things are only gonna get weirder from here.
I think the news is only going to get worse from here. It didn't have to be this way. That's what's so frustrating about it, but that's how it is. That's how it is now. So, you know, hopefully, we get a good economy out of this administration.
That'd be nice, but who knows? Who knows what we're gonna get and what we're not gonna get at this point? But I guess it's fair to say you're not gonna drain the swamp. You're not gonna get deep state arrests. And whatever operation Epstein and Maxwell were running and and all the blackmail and all the sexual perverts and pedophiles, you're not gonna get them exposed.
You're not gonna get them arrested. So, yep, people are gonna be upset with that. That's how it goes. But looks like that's now the political territory that we are in. It's the political bizarro world that we are in, so we will react accordingly.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
Breaking: President Trump calls Jeffrey Epstein list a HOAX and says those still talking about it are no longer his supporters. https://t.co/5IqyVcxkLh
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
'Owen isn't real MAGA' Oh really? Let's see your work. Or do you just post online? https://t.co/sRfeePmJFP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jerry Nadler and the Democrat party are committing treason. The wide open border and fentanyl overdoses are blamed on Biden voters. Protesters are being arrested to show censorship in the country. Impeach Trump protesters come without consequence, but others are arrested for silently standing with a sign.
Trump won and action is being taken against the steal and reelection of 45 President Donald J. Trump. Thomas Jefferson said when the government fears the people, there is freedom. Evidence submitted includes a picture of someone with tape over their mouth and a sign saying they've been banned from social media.
Owen Schroyer has been released from federal prison.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jerry Nadler and the Democrat party are committing treason against this country. And you can kick me out, but he's the one committing crimes. You are, Jerry Nadler. You're the one committing treason. America's done with this.
Speaker 1: Wanna thank you for the wide open border. We wanna thank you for all the pet call overdoses that are now the leading cause of death and middle aged deaths. We wanna thank the Biden voter for that.
Speaker 0: After all, Biden voter appreciation, man. No. No. No. Arresting in front of all these people so they can see the censorship in this country.
Go ahead. I want everybody to see the censorship in this country. Impeach Trump protesters come here every day and have never been arrested. But I'm arrested today because I have this signed. That's the attack on police peace in this country.
That's the two tier justice system that we're dealing with. If you're a impeached Trump liberal Democrat protester, you get to come here every day with no consequence. But I have security all over me because I'm standing here silently.
Speaker 2: Privacy,
Speaker 0: standing here silently. Trump won and everybody knows it. Folks, we are taking action against the steel and reelection
Speaker 2: of 45 president Donald j Trump.
Speaker 3: And I thank the Washington DC swamp for giving me this
Speaker 4: exclusive story for you today. Donald j Trump was reelected president of The United States.
Speaker 0: Thomas Jefferson once said, when the government fears the people, there is freedom. But for too long
Speaker 5: Look at what they submitted to evidence of proof that I'm somehow a criminal. A picture of me inside the Capitol with a piece of tape over my mouth and a sign that says, I've been banned from social media, and they're trying to ban me from the capital.
Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, friends and family, Owen Schroyer here. And, yes, it's official. I have been released from federal prison. And, man, do I have a lot of stories to tell.
Speaker 0: We're off to a great start here. Comey, we love the FBI. We love the
Speaker 4: Like that. Did you get that?
Speaker 2: Got it. Home run.
Speaker 0: I'm done, bro. Let's
Speaker 4: I learned from the best.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
What Tucker Carlson just told the American people is absolutely imperative information. https://t.co/9RFUQazmjd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson is facing criticism for naming individuals allegedly pushing for US military involvement in Iran, reminiscent of past Middle East conflicts. Carlson stated the real divide is between warmongers and peacemakers, not those supporting Israel or Iran. He identified Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter, and Miriam Adelson as potentially influencing Trump towards military action.
The speaker argues Americans deserve to know who is advising the president on war, and questions why supporters of intervention seem secretive and attack dissenters. Naming those potentially leading the US into another Middle East war is portrayed as a heroic act. The speaker notes Carlson's past popularity as a news host, emphasizing the impact his message would have had on his former show.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you may have seen that Tucker Carlson is getting a lot of heat and is under attack from the very same people that are trying to convince you, persuade you that it is in The United States Of America's best interest to get involved in another war in The Middle East, this time in Iran, as if we've learned nothing from the last twenty, thirty years, including Donald Trump who once used to call out Netanyahu as a liar for lying to us about weapons of mass destruction and other things that would have been our interest in the Middle East that got us into wars that ended up not being in our interest at all. It's like we've learned nothing. Replace Iraq with Iran, replace weapons of mass destruction with nuclear weapons, and there you have it. Same propaganda, new war. Same voices, New war.
But as Tucker Carlson is getting all this heat, did you read what he actually said? Here's what he said and why it's actually extremely important. The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and who and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence and those who seek to prevent it, between warmongers and peacemakers. Who are the warmongers?
They include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran. On that list, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter, and Miriam Adelson. At some point, they will have to answer for this, but you should know their names now. So Carlson under a lot of heat from the same pro war voices that many people now think are actually more pro Israel than they are pro America, more loyal to Israel than they are to America. But you can have that debate.
Here's the debate that you cannot have. If The United States ends up in another war in The Middle East and let's say it's with Iran, let's say maybe it gets bigger, let's say it gets World War three, let's say it results in a draft, All these things are potentials. These are all very real potentials. I hope none of them happen, but yet all very real potentials. If that happens, do the American people not deserve to know the names of the people that were influencing the president to make these decisions?
Do the American people not deserve to know who was in president Trump's ear encouraging him to get us involved in these wars? Do the American people not deserve that? Of course, they do. Absolutely. Of course, they do, whether for good or for bad.
And if all of these people that are mad about Tucker Carlson naming the names, tell me why. If The United States getting involved in a war with Iran or any larger escalation for that matter is such a great thing, then why are you embarrassed that you support it? Why do you feel the need to have to operate in secrecy, and why are you so desperate to convince the American people that this war is in their best interest when obviously they don't agree? It doesn't add up. But again, you can debate all that.
America deserves to know who is in president Trump's ear telling him we need to go to war with Iran, who is in president Trump's ear telling him we need to support and engage in whatever military action Israel engages in? Absolutely. The American people deserve to know that. Absolutely. That is imperative information for the American people to know so that the warmongers can't get away with it anymore.
And again, I ask, if it's such a great thing, then why are you afraid to have your name attached with it? If it's so easy to convince the American people they need to get involved, then why are you so desperate to do it? Why are you attacking anybody that debates you on it? So, no, Tucker Carlson actually did probably one of the most heroic things ever with that post. It is actually probably the most underappreciated post of all time.
He's telling you who is trying to convince the president to get involved in another war that could be catastrophic or result in more American blood or treasure in The Middle East. That is a heroic act from Tucker Carlson. That is the most American thing from Tucker Carlson. And people are attacking him as a foreign agent? Boy, I'm sorry, but that makes me think projection.
That makes me think you're a foreign agent when you're attacking an American for warning Americans, which Americans are trying to get more Americans into a war on the other side of the planet. Now here's one more thing before I sign off this video. Let's not forget that Tucker Carlson used to be the number one rated nightly news host, and it wasn't even close. Tucker Carlson would regularly double up his competition. Tucker Carlson's show was way better rated than even Sean Hannity's show on the same Fox News Network.
So before you try to cast Tucker Carlson off as a foreign agent or unpopular, obviously, you're wrong. He was the most popular news show host on cable news by far. And if he would have delivered that message that he posted on x on a Fox News monologue, it would have been international news. It would have been the biggest story in America that he named the names of the people that are trying to get us involved in another war. No.
Tucker Carlson is not the bad guy here, whether you disagree with his geopolitical stances or not. Tucker Carlson is an American hero for telling the American people who specifically by name is trying to drag them into another war. When the other side of the issue doesn't want you to know what's going on, they just want you to close your eyes, shut your mouth, and get involved in another war. Not gonna happen.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
This Brooklyn Bridge story is insane to me. The Captain of this boat has to be guilty of multiple crimes, other than bad taste, and should face severe pushishment and never be on a boat again. Hopefully everyone is ok. https://t.co/EEIyjSUH8B
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is shocked by an event occurring on a bridge. They express disbelief and urgency, exclaiming "Holy crap" and noting someone is "gonna hit the top." The speaker is filming the event and states, "My camera. What is going on? What?" They observe that "the bridge is shaking out there" and emphasize the need to keep moving. The speaker is surprised to see people on the bridge, stating, "There's people up there. There's literally people. This is insane."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Holy crap. He's gonna hit the top. My camera. What is going on? What?
The bridge is shaking out there. We gotta keep moving. Oh, there's people up there. There's literally people. This is insane.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A vessel is crashing into the Brooklyn Bridge. The sails are hitting something.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crash into the Brooklyn Bridge. It's totally crashing. Look. Look. The sails are hitting me.
It was. Look. Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. What is going on?
Speaker 0: Oh my god. What is going on?
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
WATCH: James Comey Gets Confronted To His Face For Illegally Spying On Donald Trump https://t.co/CXVeom4WY3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, here's the shortened transcript:
There he is, James Comey. The fired FBI director, some call him a deep state hero. I'm so excited to see him, I don't know why others aren't as excited as I am. They're going to screen questions, I wonder if anyone will ask who killed Epstein? It's an honor to see the disgraced and fired FBI director in person.
Wait, are you asking me to leave? But Comey can stay, right? We love James Comey. Sure, he didn't disrupt the library, but he disrupted the whole country. James Comey disrupted an entire country, a presidential election, and a presidential term. Still, my heart is fluttering that I got to see him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. James Comey. James Comey. The fired FBI director, James Comey. The deep state hero, James Comey.
Speaker 1: Oh, man. I'm so I'm so excited. I don't know why these people aren't as excited as me. Sorry. My excitement, officer.
I'm because screen. They're gonna screen your questions. Who killed Epstein? My heart is beating out of my chest.
Speaker 0: Have several moments. Have Laura Carlton and you have Lauren Garcia. Wow. What
Speaker 1: an honor, guys. I'll tell you. To get to actually see the disgraced and fired FBI director in person was truly a magnanimous occasion for me.
Speaker 2: We'd like you to leave.
Speaker 1: And, oh, you'd like me to leave? Oh, she'd like me to leave. She'd like me to leave. Comey can stay, though. Right?
Comey's cool.
Speaker 0: Right? We
Speaker 1: love Jamie Comey.
Speaker 2: He didn't disrupt the library.
Speaker 1: James Comey. He just disrupted the whole he just disrupted the whole country. Yeah. He didn't disrupt the library. James Comey just disrupted the entire country and a presidential election and a presidential, term for Donald Trump.
So but wow. I mean, my heart is just fluttering that I got to see James Comey.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
The Original AIDS Skrillex Video That Broke The Internet And Changed The Course Of The 2016 Election https://t.co/dbOy22DyJ9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Proud people discuss Trump's deportation plans, ISIS, and police brutality. They compare Trump to Hitler, highlighting immigration policies. They argue about racism, privilege, and the changing times under Trump's presidency. The conversation is heated and emotional.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Proud people.
Speaker 1: He wants to deport yes. He wants to deport Mexicans. He wants to make Muslims wear identification. So this moment started. What are we doing about ISIS?
Speaker 0: ISIS is not
Speaker 1: it's not right. It's what we all do to each other in America.
Speaker 0: Yes. Look at all the fucking, So then you didn't
Speaker 1: support the Iraqi war.
Speaker 0: No. I didn't.
Speaker 1: Neither did Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Let's bring it back to black people being killed by police. Okay. What has Trump said about that? What about white people being killed by police?
Speaker 0: Fuck off. That's not racist though. No.
Speaker 1: Fuck off if the white guy is killed by a policeman, only a black lives matter.
Speaker 0: That's not a fucking issue compared
Speaker 1: to the black people that are gunned down every single day by police.
Speaker 0: What have you done to benefit this planet? No. No. No. What happened?
Hitler not remind you of that this Trump not remind you of that.
Speaker 1: No. Explain to me how Trump is like Hitler. Massed a portion. Donald Trump wants to effect was founded on immigration.
Speaker 2: That's a question.
Speaker 1: That's something that you've never experienced depression in your entire fucking life. Neither of us.
Speaker 0: I know me. You're fucking a white male.
Speaker 1: So You're a white man. Better.
Speaker 0: I White people don't
Speaker 1: invite me before.
Speaker 0: That's right. Right. Bullshit. That's not where he's in it. You like it?
Speaker 2: Since 2016, not 1916.
Speaker 1: But your
Speaker 2: good old white days are over with. Your good old white days are over with. Ain't no more of them days, Trump. It's over.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
The most prolific child predator catcher on the internet @ifightforkids tells me how he does it and how rampant pedophiles are on the internet. Protect your kids. https://t.co/BPFxDFsjTU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex Rosen from Predator Poachers exposes child predators on the internet. He travels across the country to confront and expose these individuals, often posing as a child or a fellow predator online. Rosen and his team have caught close to 600 predators in 49 states, with arrests made in 44 of them. They use various tactics, such as pretending to be a mailman or engaging in explicit conversations, to gather evidence against the predators. Rosen believes that the punishment for child predators should be severe, including the death penalty in certain cases. He also warns parents to closely monitor their children's online activities and suggests disabling chat features on apps to prevent communication with potential predators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Interesting guests, censored topics. It's InfoWars 30 minutes with Owen Schroyer, brought to you by infowarsstore.com. If your children have access to the Internet or a cell phone, you might be surprised who has access to them. One individual who has exposed some of the darker corners of this Internet phenomenon of adults looking for children to sexually exploit online is Alex Rosen from Predator Poachers, and he joins me now to talk about what it's like to expose child predators on the Internet looking for access to your children. Alex, thank you for joining me today.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Now correct me if I'm wrong, but you actually just came here from San Antonio where you busted another child predator.
Speaker 1: Yes. We are very, very busy. We're here in Austin right now. Tomorrow, we're gonna be at Huntsville, Alabama. Get hopefully, 2 people.
So, yeah, we get around.
Speaker 0: So no days off for you. Even before you came in for this interview, you said I'm gonna bust 1 more.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Is this like is there an adrenaline rush for you? Are you almost, dare I say, addicted to exposing and catching these people?
Speaker 1: I would say it's an addiction. Because it kind of is like a my strange addiction thing, except the addiction is, like, productive. I have a great time doing it, and the reason for that being is, 1, I mean, it's just fun to, you know, mentally screw with people that have been screwed with children for God knows how long. And 2, it's a really fulfilling feeling knowing that what we're doing is making a difference. I mean, the amount the sheer amount of kids that I know aren't in the hands of these child predators because of our efforts, me and the teams, it's a really good feeling to know, and it's nice to see that a difference is being made.
Speaker 0: Well, Well, that's a whole another issue of getting results and arrests and I do wanna get to that. But how much of this are you able to control or schedule? Like, did you know you were gonna bust this guy today, or did the opportunity present itself, and you said, hey, let's do this before we travel?
Speaker 1: Very rarely do we have, like, a, let's just wait and see what we get. When we make these trips across the country, we do, have a schedule. So this guy was on the list today. Obviously, they don't know they're on the list, so we kinda have to run on predator time, so, in this case, he wasn't home when we went to go knock, so I had to call him as like a mailman, and say, hey, I got a package for you. So he came to the house, and that's when we, interrogated him.
Speaker 0: And that's usually a tactic you use as with mail. Right? That was a tactic that I've seen you use before. Is that one that they just think, oh, I'm getting some mail and so they'll answer, they'll tell you whether they're home or not?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Everybody's excited about a package even, like, grown men try to prey on kids. So, yeah, they they fall for it too.
Speaker 0: Well and you mentioned here from your video earlier today that law enforcement is a hit or miss. You made a direct reference to it being in San Antonio. So is it kind of a jurisdictional thing or just in general, you never know if police are actually going to apprehend the predators you catch?
Speaker 1: It's a 100% of jurisdictional thing. Like tomorrow, when we're gonna be in Huntsville, I'm positive these people are gonna get arrested. We have 7 arrests in Huntsville, Alabama alone. We're 7 for 7 there, 7 catches, 7 arrests, but in San Antonio, in Bexar County, it's really a toss-up, so I have to go to court in 2 weeks in Bexar County for a middle school teacher we caught with tons of child porn and
Speaker 0: A teacher?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Middle school teacher.
Speaker 0: Well, the individual you caught today was an engineer, and I think you've maybe caught some engineers before.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sure.
Speaker 0: Well, I I find that strange because people would think, you know, an engineer that requires a higher degree, some sort of a level of, you know, commitment to a a career and to studying Mhmm. And then you deal with a teacher as well. I mean, is there any pattern as far as career paths? Because normally, you'd think these are just deranged people, maybe some mental issues. They stay at home all day.
But I mean, an engineer earlier today, a middle school teacher earlier this year in San Antonio?
Speaker 1: Yes. We get everybody from, yeah, just mentally deranged people that you would call special needs all the way up to teachers and engineers. Yeah. The teacher earlier this year, he was in Converse, Texas, but the same county as San Antonio, it's just a suburb, and he got arrested on child pornography and online solicitation of a minor, which is him trying to go after a fake 14 year old boy.
Speaker 0: How many individuals have you caught in, I mean, I would just say childhood education, but there's other access there's other jobs that give you access to children as well, other than education. Is that a pattern that you notice?
Speaker 1: I don't really when it comes to jobs, I don't really notice too many patterns with it. This really doesn't have a lot of I mean, yeah, sure, they definitely wanna be around children, but they don't have to be their job doesn't really neglect them being around children. If they wanna be, they can be, whether it's step kids, their own kids, or whatever. But I think the biggest job we've caught is probably truck drivers.
Speaker 0: Well, mentioning their own kids, you did catch an individual earlier this month. Child predator confesses to molesting and creating child porn of his own 5 year old daughter. Was this one of the most intense exchanges you've had? Yes.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. His name was Kevin Cook. He's currently in Hamilton County, Iowa jail, and he ended up confessing to us that he produced child pornography of his own daughter and was molesting her, and he invited our decoy over to go play with his daughter. We were, in this case, we were posing as a pedophile online, and he messages us, asks if we're close to Iowa, and we're like, Yeah, we're close to Iowa, and he invites us over to go he's like, I'm doing this to my kid. Do you wanna come over?
We're like, yeah, we'll come over, and he invites us over on a Sunday. We show up on that Friday before he has custody of her again, and he tries to tell us that, oh, I was doing the same thing you're doing, trying to catch people. And then I poke some holes in his story, and he ends up flipping and just basically spilling his guts that he's been doing this. So he's facing up to 55 years now.
Speaker 0: So let me get this straight. This man was sexually abusing his own children Correct. And invited what he thought was another predator over to engage in this? Yes. He wanted Film this?
Speaker 1: Yes. He wanted to take it to the next level. So at the moment, he was only I say only, only only touching her. He hasn't raped her yet, and he's only taken photos, but he hasn't, well, that is producing child porn, but he hasn't produced any sexual videos of her. Like, him and her doing sexual acts together, but he wanted to take to the next level when he invited us over.
And luckily, we showed up before that
Speaker 0: could happen. It's an amazing exchange when you get him to admit all of this. And you've you've done this before, getting them to admit all of this on the spot. Mhmm. But have you ever run into an individual that abuses his own children and films it?
Speaker 1: His own children films it. Besides Kevin Cook, I mean, I'm sure we have, but no not not with an admission. We've had people that have admitted to abusing their own kids, but haven't admitted to filming it in the act.
Speaker 0: How much does this stuff haunt you? You have to face these people.
Speaker 1: Well, it doesn't haunt me because, yeah, obviously, I don't wanna hear about Kevin Cook's details about what he's doing to his daughter, but I also know if I listen to that, that means she's not gonna get abused anymore, so that doesn't haunt me. It actually makes me it it actually is a better feeling that it's not gonna happen anymore. I look at the pot half full. You know what I mean? Glass half full.
Speaker 0: Now when you go on, we'll say these sting operations, a lot of times you'll dress in clothing that people might say, well, that looks like children's clothing. Is that part of the mind game?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. Like, if I feel if I roll up in a suit and tie, they're gonna think that I'm there to get them in trouble, and that I'm there as, like, you know, as an authority figure, but if I just show up, dab them up, and I'm like, hey, man, yeah, I just wanna have a conversation with you, they just think of me as, like, a peer, and just peer to peer, let's just talk about it. And then they end up spilling, and, yeah. It's definitely not child's play after I'm done with them.
Speaker 0: Well, you've probably I mean, how many how many predators do you think you've exposed? I mean, the number's in the hundreds. Do you have a number exactly how many?
Speaker 1: I would say close to 600.
Speaker 0: And and how many states?
Speaker 1: We've done catch catches in 49 states except for Alaska, and we have arrests in 44 of them.
Speaker 0: Would you say that these are better numbers than the federal government is producing as far as catching these predators?
Speaker 1: Not in total numbers, but efficiency wise, I would maybe say so.
Speaker 0: Now when you go and you do a bust like this, how often is the individual either already in some probationary, you know, because they've already been busted versus this is the first time they've ever been caught?
Speaker 1: Too often. So, I hope what Meaning most of
Speaker 0: the time they've already been caught before you expose them?
Speaker 1: No. Not most of the time, but just often enough for me to say that it's happening too much. So I I'm gonna bring up Jeffrey Rose. He was in Las Vegas. He's currently back in jail doing 20 to life, but he he was sentenced to life in prison for molesting a ton of kids.
He scored himself a retrial, and while he's out out on, like, some type of bond or some type of promise to appear back in court for a retrial, like, after 20 years, he messages our 9 year old decoy. His first message to us is, do you like child porn? And obviously, he got very sexual with who he thought was his 9 year old girl. Then we show up to his house, and while he has an ankle monitor on, he confesses to us that he has over 50,000 images of child pornography. So, yeah, that retrial never happened.
He ended up taking a plea, to 20 to life after he got caught.
Speaker 0: I learned when I was inside the system how much child predators are actually protected by law enforcement. It it was shocking to me when I was on the inside. If you're a child predator, you get a lot smaller sentence than somebody that gets caught even just dealing marijuana.
Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely. We had a guy I think the sickest one we ever caught is named Clayton Tanner. He didn't have the most victims. He was only 19, but if he went unchecked for 40 years, I think he'd have dead bodies. He brought a knife to go chop up an infant, and he only got 3 to 8 years when he got convicted.
Speaker 0: And he admitted that he not just wanted to sexually abuse a child, but you're talking about maiming and potentially killing? Yeah.
Speaker 1: He said he didn't wanna murder, but obviously what he was gonna like, he did say he wanted to chop them, like, basically cut them with a knife. He brought the pocket knife. He gave me the knife, and he also wanted to desecrate with both, urine and, crap.
Speaker 0: And film this?
Speaker 1: He didn't say anything about filming it, but I would assume he probably would have.
Speaker 0: And this is the type of content that gets out on the Internet and and I wanna get back to this, you know, and maybe we'll ask you what you think parents can do to avoid this, but you're one man. You have a you have a small crew, I guess, of 1 besides you, normally?
Speaker 1: No. We we got, 15 people on the team.
Speaker 0: Okay. So you've expanded your your enterprise. That's good. But all things considered, you're a small enterprise, low budget compared to what the federal government has, obviously. Definitely.
And you consider your efficiency. Why do you suppose that the US government aren't running operations like you, but instead trying to entrap innocent Americans?
Speaker 1: Well, the FBI definitely has way, way, way, way, way too many sour grapes, and you know, you've heard stories about people in the FBI that were in sex crimes getting transferred to like political stuff, like what they got you for, which really was nothing. But, I mean, the FBI agents we've dealt with, like, that's who have taken up our case, have been great. They definitely care, but I think their hands are tied by, like, the by, like, the DC ones.
Speaker 0: What is a decoy? You mentioned your decoy earlier. Explain what that is.
Speaker 1: A decoy is somebody that poses as something or not online, so we usually decoy as a kid. Sometimes we decoy as a pedo and see what happens.
Speaker 0: And this is relatively easy. That's why you do it.
Speaker 1: Yes. It is very easy to find a child predator online. The hard part is having to plan it, having to deal with it, and of course, traveling for it. But, yes, finding 1, anybody can do.
Speaker 0: And what are the avenues that you use so that parents can know I need to either heavily monitor my child's actions on these platforms or just outright nix it, make sure they're not there?
Speaker 1: I mean, literally every single app from Roblox to Instagram to Facebook to Telegram, I mean, they're crawling on every single app, and if I were a parent, I mean, give your I mean, there's no perfect solution, but hand your kids a football or a basketball and just let them go play outside. Let them be kids.
Speaker 0: Is the most high profile bus you ever made, a popular streamer, YouTube content creator, edp 445? Was that the most high profile buzz you made?
Speaker 1: Yeah. He was the most known guy. Yes. And
Speaker 0: were you expecting that? Was that a targeted thing or it just happened when you busted this guy, you you showed up and that was him?
Speaker 1: Well, so we heard accusations, for like a year before anything we did. You know, we saw messages of him messaging minors, minors, all this type of stuff. So we had an idea of what he was. It wasn't just, like, oh my god, I didn't know he was like this. So we actually had a profile and we followed him, and we usually don't reach out first, but, you know, he had so many followers that the chance of him seeing us were pretty low, so that's why we just said hello to him.
And he says hi back, and then we just ignore him after that because we didn't wanna continue the conversation on our end. Then he double texts 2 days later and says, hey, so what you doing? Completely, like, unprovoked. Like, we didn't say I'm doing this, I'm that. He just completely, out of nowhere, says that, and we're like, holy crap.
So we had 13 on our profile. He knew we were 13. We, of course, reiterated we were 13. And then from there, he got extremely sexual. It took a while, but he sent masturbation videos, a picture of his own shit, which was probably the most unpleasant pic he sent, in that whole thing.
And he eventually solicited sex. Like he said, I want to throw you in a sex dungeon and all of that. Obviously, he doesn't have a sex dungeon, but his mind wanders pretty much when he thinks of these children, and he eventually meets up to go, see this kid.
Speaker 0: What was the legal outcome of that?
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, nothing happened. Kern County, California does not like civilian cases.
Speaker 0: How often do people send you sick videos like that?
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh.
Speaker 0: And then they obviously assume that you're or they think you're a minor when they send it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So me as a straight male have seen way more penises than vaginas by probably 50 fold.
Speaker 0: So you get this regularly?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: Just by saying you're a minor on the Internet?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Just today just today, the guy sent 5 penis pictures that we caught earlier, like, just willy nilly.
Speaker 0: Do you think that our maybe I'll ask, are there other high profile individuals on your radar?
Speaker 1: At the moment, no. But, you know, I think there's a lot of people that are preying on kids on our radar. And to those kids, they're definitely high profile because they want them out of their lives. That's why I look at it.
Speaker 0: Well, for those that don't know, you and I actually did a sting together and I kinda got to see some of the behind the scenes of how you operate. And I mean, yeah, you you have to go into some dark places. You probably have to do some things that you would even admit is kinda dark as well.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I mean, when we when we pose as the I mean, when we're posing as the kid, it's easy. Like, we're just innocent, like, okay, that's fine. I'll try this. Like, we don't really have to say much, but, I mean, having to tell a predator, like, Yeah, my preference is, 8 to 16.
That's what we told Kevin in Iowa, for example. We set our preference to 8 to 16, and just say, like, hey, bro, you got any infant stuff? Like, probing to see what they have, and then just having those sick conversations, absolutely. Like, I even had to do a video call with a predator as myself. I was posing as like a father of a 9 year old girl.
I'm 23, I don't have a 9 year old girl, but I was posing as the father of a 9 year old girl, and, in that recorded conversation, he admits he's at work just watching child porn. He brings his laptop to work. He's watching child porn. His name's David Dunn. He's currently in jail.
What did
Speaker 0: he do for a living?
Speaker 1: He was a mechanic, but kinda part time. He was kinda older at that point. But, yeah. So we bust him for child porn a couple weeks later. He's currently sitting in Virginia jail since September.
Speaker 0: Well, the individual that we ended up exposing, and I I think his fate was nothing. I don't think ever law enforcement followed up with that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Austin is really, it's unfortunate he was in Austin. We really wanted to get him somewhere else.
Speaker 0: But but when I looked at that, that was more of what I would consider kind of a stereotypical catch, You know, he lives with family in a disheveled house. Yep. Obviously, probably not mentally well. Right. The situation with whatever family he lives with, obviously not good either.
We could just tell by the situation that he was living in. How often would you say it's a it's kinda more stereotypical where it's like, yeah, that's what you would expect a predator to look like versus somebody that you would be like, oh, this just seems like a normal guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That is definitely the plurality, I'd say, of just being a loser. Like, it's not like they're just total winners in real life, then the pedophilia is just the outlier. It it it pretty often, it is that, but like I said, we catch anybody of all backgrounds.
Speaker 0: You've also done some other videos like crashing political events. Why did you decide to crash political events?
Speaker 1: I'm just confronting who I think are predators. No. I'm just kidding. Yeah. Well, you know, I've always just been the type, just go do it when nobody else has.
Like, even in high school, like I would just scream in the hallways for no reason, kind of, like, just shout out just shout out stuff and just whatever, so I've always been this kind of the louder type. So, you know, when it comes to political events, like, I don't like these politicians. I think they're truly just slime balls and they're screwing a lot of us over. But most issues are within ourselves, like, we gotta figure out our own stuff before we play to politicians. But nonetheless, they're not helping us in any way.
And, you know, just knowing that I could crash a rally and just kind of say, hey, just call them out for what they are. They're they're fellow humans, they're not just these special people. I like taking them down a peg and I definitely credit Alex Stein for giving me that idea. I mean, I saw him do it. I'm like, why not me too?
Speaker 0: So Well, and I noticed that, you know, there's kind of a community because there's other individuals that catch predators like you on the Internet. Would you say there's kind of like a community of y'all? Do you communicate?
Speaker 1: Yeah. There is. Most of us get along really well with each other.
Speaker 0: And and do you guys have similar politics?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Interesting. Absolutely. I I'd say the our the predator catching, we have, like, a big group chat on Instagram.
We range from moderate all the way to, like, far right, So we don't have a single leftist in the group chat with us. Like, even the moderate ones seem to be pro. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
No. We I mean, most people aren't, but institutionally, yes, leftism is pro predator.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, we see it in the classrooms. We see it every day with stories where they wanna introduce the children to sex toys, sex acts. I mean, even just blatant pornography in the classroom.
Speaker 1: 100%. Yeah. I I think that I I think that agenda is definitely I mean, it's poisonous for children. I mean, that being normalized to them at such a young age before their brains develop, you got to absolutely convince them to be something or not, and I think that is the goal. Oh, I I don't think that's the end goal.
I think the end goal is depopulation, but I think that's one step closer to that.
Speaker 0: Well, they're not gonna be having kids, right, if they engage in that type of, ideology and behavior. You also went undercover exposing ballot harvesting in Texas. Would you like to talk about that?
Speaker 1: Yes. So that was, gosh, that was in 2022. So all those rumors you hear about, like, oh, well, Democrats just take advantage of the old people and just, you know, kinda tell them what to fill out. That's a real thing. I mean, I caught it on camera.
I mean, there was just this old guy with a ballot in his hand, and I don't know if she was bending the rules, sitting on the fence there, but she was basically saying, like, yeah, I'd fill out this guy, I'd fill out that guy, and whether it was legal or not, 100% unethical for her to just tell him that because he wouldn't have known or even voted if it wasn't for her just basically saying, like, hey, do this. Well, it's predatory behavior. It is very predatory. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I mean, that's why it kinda fits right into what you're doing, whether it's whether it's predators going after children that are unassuming and innocent. It's kind of the same in that situation where this is an elderly person Right. Unassuming, innocent, don't really know what's going on. These people knock at the door, show up and say, hey, we really care about you. Let's help you vote.
And then write down the ticket. They say, you won all Democrats.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Like, basically, you you know, like a leading like a leading question in a way. It's like they're leading them to just do that. And, I mean, if that's not illegal, it's a very, very smart move, but it's very slimy.
Well,
Speaker 0: I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that that's not an isolated incident that you caught.
Speaker 1: Oh, hell, no.
Speaker 0: No. Now you have a pretty popular Rumble page. You've got, right now, 72,000 followers when I checked this morning. Your average videos now are getting up to tens of the tens of thousands, 100 of thousands. You've come a long way, but have you endured any censorship along the way from from, your content creation?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. YouTube has nuked us, like, 7 times. Rumble has been, Rumble's been great. I wish they would promote us more, but, Rumble, I mean, no issues with them. They let us do our thing, and Locals has been great too.
They let us do our thing. So, very grateful that I don't have to look over my shoulders if I have a career the next day.
Speaker 0: Why would YouTube center your content?
Speaker 1: That's a good question. I mean gave you a reason. They called it harassment and bullying, And I understand back in the day, we would scream at them, sure. But now, I mean, they call it just simple interviews with the predators harassment and bullying.
Speaker 0: Now you say back in the day, like, you feel that you've kind of mastered your craft a little bit, polished yourself up a little bit?
Speaker 1: Definitely not mastered, but polished for sure. Polished for sure.
Speaker 0: Okay. Now you commented on a breaking story. The Idaho House passed a bill to give pedophiles the death penalty. You said this is the way. Do do you really believe that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. 100%. Yeah. Of course, there's no perfect there's no perfect solution. The perfect solution is just, you know, cap it well, I think just doing away with them ASAP.
But the Idaho penalty is, would be something about, like, 12 and under, which is a step in the right direction for sure, and I'm definitely not complaining it was passed.
Speaker 0: Now when you talk about this, are you talking about people that view this content on the Internet as well, not just people that engage in the sexual abuse?
Speaker 1: Yeah. There's some nuance to that. Like, I think if you're, like, I think if you're, like, 19 and some and a 16 year old sends you a picture of her nude, I don't think you should be put to death for that, for example, but because that would still count as child porn. But, yeah, if you're looking at, like, infants, toddlers, even looking at that, there's a I there was a study back in the day day, I can't cite exactly, but the chance they've done something in person when they're viewing that stuff is very, very high.
Speaker 0: Now people might be shocked by what you just said. You said infants and toddlers, but this stuff actually exists on the Internet.
Speaker 1: So so common. So common.
Speaker 0: And and you actually run into entire threads on certain platforms or there's entire rooms or websites that are dedicated to this stuff where people just hang out every day to find these images.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. There's groups. We've heard of over 10 tens of thousands of people, and they just trade that all day long.
Speaker 0: Where do you think these images are generated mostly?
Speaker 1: Well, we do ask that question to the people we interview and a lot of them say they look to be overseas. So we've heard a lot of India, Southeast Asia, and South America.
Speaker 0: Can you think of any way? I mean, you might not be an expert in Internet or anything like that, but, I mean, how can we keep this stuff from getting into our Internet and on our phones and computers?
Speaker 1: Well, there's no perfect solution, but I think apps, encrypted apps like Telegram of course, I don't even think they should be banned because I think our freedom of speech supersedes any type of crime, but fish there has to be sensors for certain images because they there's hash values of these images, like, the a lot of these images are spread around so often. I I I I would think there's a way they can just explicitly look for those images and videos without even looking at speech. So I hope they do something like that.
Speaker 0: What are some of the code words or sayings that you see that lead you down the path that, oh, I know this is where it's going?
Speaker 1: Oh, well, pizza is the biggest one. That's the most common one. Anytime they say they have pizza, we instantly know, and we've we've caught people that we haven't communicated with online that are just following pizza pages, and they admit to viewing, like, countless files of child porn, just based on what they were following on Instagram, just publicly. We've seen pizza. We've seen unicorn.
Trying to think what else. Gosh. I'm blanking out here right now. But,
Speaker 0: but use the the individual that when I went along the ride with you 4 I mean, they talk about they have these massive folders, massive files. I mean, we're talking about gigabytes, terabytes in size that they all share with one another.
Speaker 1: Oh, 100%. They're usually called mega links and, I've heard that the biggest mega link that I've heard of was somebody who told me that they received a 500 gigabyte Megalink. So that's I don't even know how many images that would be.
Speaker 0: That's 500 gigabytes of child exploitation.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And and how often do you run into something that large when you catch a predator?
Speaker 1: Well, often in the groups, so there's ways for us to turn off any images being displayed while being in the group, so that's how we kinda pull their, info out of there. But the links, they're not displayed, but, you know, you can see what the links say and we obviously don't click on them, but we see mega links flowing around so often and they're anywhere from, like, literally 0 to 500, like, just any size.
Speaker 0: So we opened the interview. I said and it's not like it's a new phenomenon. The Internet's been around for a while. I I had access to the Internet when I was a kid. Probably first started learning how to use it pretty well, I would even say, by the time I was a teenager.
So children get access to the Internet. They get access to these apps. They have now their smartphones. A lot of parents let them carry it around. A tablet, they get access to this stuff.
But parents don't realize the individuals that now might be getting access to their children. How do you try to warn parents about this? I mean, you said, hey. Give them a football, give them a this, give a soccer ball, let them go play on the playground. Well, that's a nice solution.
But outside of that, what warnings would you give to parents? How would you tell them to protect their children on the Internet?
Speaker 1: Well, so on most of these, apps, like I know Roblox is one, for example. I mean, we've got so many parents hitting us up saying, hey, this this guy's talking to my kid on Roblox. Can you do anything about it? The easiest thing on Roblox, you can turn off on a profile, you can turn off a chat to where you cannot say anything to anybody else. So no matter what a predator is saying to your kid, the kid can't communicate back and the predator will just think, well, what's this what's this mute?
I'm gonna go find somebody else. So that's the easiest way. And on Instagram, you could turn off direct messages. You know, because if you if it's your friends in person, you could always just get their phone number. So you don't need Instagram to talk to your friends.
So you could still do the social media without having to communicate with any outsiders, which, you know, I don't have heard social media at all, but if you're gonna do it, there's ways to just turn that off. So that's that's that's the main thing I encourage, and I think that'll stop a lot of it.
Speaker 0: Now if a parent suspects that their child is now in communication with a child predator, and I guess you've run into this too, what is the what is the right thing to do as far as getting law enforcement involved? Because it's a very difficult thing to even bring justice to most of these situations, it sounds like.
Speaker 1: Oh, 100%. Because a lot of times and this isn't the parents' fault. I mean, no parent wants to go through and look up child solicitation laws, but a lot of times if, you know, if a predator is calling their kid cute or pretty or something, they'll just think, oh my god, I'm just gonna cut this off immediately. You know, obviously, that's the knee jerk reaction. That stops the communication with them, but what I would encourage is, you know, because calling a kid cute or pretty is not a crime.
It's, you know, it's very very creepy, but by law, it's not a crime. What I would do if I was the parent is I would go to your local PD and I would let the cops take it over. So if you have someone flirting with your 10 year old, calling him cute or pretty, alert the cops, but have them take it over, don't just cut off the communication. Obviously, don't let your kid keep talking to the predator, but bring it to the police and let them actually try to finish the investigation.
Speaker 0: Do you continue, do you plan to continue to do this work and expand your predator poachers network?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. I do. I love it.
Speaker 0: And you found other people that are effective at doing this as well across the nation?
Speaker 1: We're looking we're looking for that. We're we might expand for that in that regard soon. But behind the scenes with decoying and stuff like that, we have the best group of decoys, and they make my life a lot easier.
Speaker 0: Well, I think you're doing great work. And the more number of predators that you get off the street despite your uphill battle with law enforcement, the better. Alex Rosen of Predator Poachers, thank you for your time.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Infowars.comforward/go.
Speaker 3: In 60 seconds, I don't have time to tell you about all the incredible ingredients in turbo force. If you simply go to infowarsstore.com, look at the list of ingredients, and look them up, Every one of them is known to give you boosted, clean, focused energy without the letdown. We're talking up to 10 hours of clean energy per serving with TurboForce exclusively available at infowarsstore.com, and it's discounted right now. And it doesn't just boost your body's clarity and focus and stamina. It also funds the InfoWar, so it's a 3 60 win.
If you've never tried TurboForce, now is the time. It's got 5 star reviews. Turboforce@infowarsstore.com will take your energy and your clarity to the next level without the letdown, and it funds the Infowar, a true 3 60 win. So go get TurboForce today at infowarsstore.com, and I know you will not be disappointed because thousands of others have gotten in and it has 5 star reviews. Get Turbo Force now.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
Reporter GOES OFF on Biden Border Patrol facilitating the invasion of our country: https://t.co/boPgG3iV2N
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features a speaker expressing frustration over what they perceive as an open border policy and the mistreatment of American citizens. They criticize the media for not covering the situation and accuse the government of prioritizing illegal immigrants over American citizens. The speaker questions the effectiveness of the immigration system and expresses concern about the country's future. They also criticize Governor Abbott for not taking action to stop the influx of illegal immigrants. The video concludes with the speaker calling out what they believe to be human trafficking and the suppression of information by the global elite.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Americans.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: Your country gets away. Yeah. You dirty Americans. Get out of the way. This is the illegal immigrants' country.
What do you guys think you're doing? This country's for illegal immigrants. You guys are dirty Americans. Get out of the way. How rude of you.
How rude of you to think you have a country anymore. Hey. Let's get another truck up here so no media can see this. In fact, let's just ban the media. Hey, guys.
We're gonna need you to shut your cameras off. We cannot document Biden's border invasion. Okay? Everybody. Shut your cameras down.
No free speech. The border patrol's here to tell me to shut up too. Sir. Sir, he says. An American citizen.
Freaking an American citizen. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. This guy's ridiculous. The other media to be able to cover this.
Speaker 0: No. No. No media. No. Oh, no.
No for media though. Hey, no media. Nobody see the illegal immigrants. It's not happening.
Speaker 1: It's not happening.
Speaker 0: Sir, am I okay okay to be upset. Do I have the right to redress grievances here?
Speaker 1: But you but you're not being you're being discourteous to your country.
Speaker 0: I'm being discourteous. A wide open border, but I'm being discourteous. For
Speaker 1: Allow them Allow them I
Speaker 0: love it. They can record. Nobody's stopping them.
Speaker 1: Forward
Speaker 0: with. Nobody's stopping them except you guys. Look, she's trying to stop the media. You guys don't wants to see this. You drove a bus through
Speaker 1: a ravine.
Speaker 0: You drove a bus through a ravine so we couldn't see this. Do you think the American people very stupid?
Speaker 1: Do you guys think
Speaker 0: the American people's stupid? Do you guys like this? Just kinda just get You guys like, get out of the way, dirty Americans. Shut off for cameras. Nobody's allowed to see.
There is no Biden border invasion. Shut your cameras off. Everybody go home.
Speaker 1: For What have you done for the country? Excuse me? What have you done for the country?
Speaker 0: What does that have to do with anything?
Speaker 1: I'm asking you. What have they done for the country?
Speaker 0: I pay for their bills. I pay taxes.
Speaker 1: For Okay. So what's
Speaker 0: your point? Again, what have
Speaker 1: you do to this So
Speaker 0: you're okay with the illegal immigration? You're cool with that? For should we fund the should
Speaker 1: we fund endless wars in Ukraine?
Speaker 0: Should we fund endless illegal immigration? Is that your policy? You like that?
Speaker 1: Are they legal? For yes. Because according to me, there's food at the side
Speaker 0: of the system. Okay. So we should just get rid of the whole immigration system then. Right? So let's get rid well, then why have for why have an immigration system?
Speaker 1: That's not what I'm saying at all.
Speaker 0: So let's have an open border and a welfare state.
Speaker 1: Open border.
Speaker 0: This is an attack on a country, folks. That's what this is. If you can't see it, you're oblivious. And we sit here and film it and take this from our government. Unbelievable.
Unbelievable. But, hey, for don't worry. They'll get they'll get taken care of. They'll get food. They'll get clothes.
They'll get everything they need. You dirty Americans need to shut brought up and get out of the way.
Speaker 1: That's a movie.
Speaker 0: Look at this. They get protected they get protected with guns, but the Democrats wanna take guns from you. So guns to protect the illegal immigrants, but y'all aren't allowed to have guns when the Democrats ban all your assault weapons. This is just ludicrous, man. This is a clown world that I forbidden.
What a joke.
Speaker 1: You gotta move back. You gotta move back. Get out of
Speaker 0: the way, you dirty Americans. This isn't your country for
Speaker 1: operation of peace.
Speaker 0: Law enforcement. Open border law enforcement here. This is what you get when incompetent clowns frums run your country, and you're not gonna shut me up. I'm an American citizen. I have a first amendment right.
It's not when we start acting like Americans. This is ridiculous. For And you know what? I guarantee you, they all agree with me. I guarantee you, they all agree with me, but their leaders are too cowardly to do the right thing.
For Yeah. Get that border patrol truck in the way. Make sure nobody can see it. Unbelievable. You guys like this?
You guys like for America? Yeah. The same border patrol agent that tried to shut me up said there was no illegal immigrants coming in just 20 minutes ago. For that's so this is amazing stuff right here,
Speaker 1: ain't it? Let's all
Speaker 0: just accept the state of our country. For make sure the illegal immigrants get better protection and more rights than everybody here. Unbelievable stuff. And look, hey, no one else complains, you know. It's always for gotta be me.
No. Everybody else loves being told that they don't have any rights, and they have to pay for all of it. They just love being lied to. They love being treated like a bitch by their government. It's just beautiful for Welfare state, open border.
Great stuff. Just beautiful. Way to go. I told you it was the for What did I say? It was the Biden border invasion party.
We're all here. Hey. Who's got the music? Let's let's start partying, y'all. We're all
Speaker 1: here for Biden's border invasion.
Speaker 0: Hey. For Show me the border. It's a one way street. None of y'all can go over there, but they can come in here. Is there a country I can go to and get free stuff?
For I'm sick of being treated like trash by my government. Maybe there's a country that'll give me free stuff. Certainly not. Well, maybe I'll just become an illegal immigrant. Maybe I'll just identify for Venezuelan prisoner.
He'll let me in. Unbelievable stuff, man.
Speaker 1: I don't wanna need you guys to do it. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Come on, dirty Americans. Get out
Speaker 1: of the way. So that law Go ahead.
Speaker 0: Law enforcement. Why don't we board law enforcement? I love the irony. Everything's irony. Everything's reversed, upside down
Speaker 1: in clown for I only wish
Speaker 0: I had a clown horn for the occasion. If only I had a red nose maybe too, you know, some face paint. We could really doing big. The Biden border invasion. Unbelievable stuff, man.
Speaker 1: For That's it. You should be in line, Jack.
Speaker 0: Totally. No. We don't have a country anymore. This is it. I mean, this is it, folks.
You do not have for country. This is a one way street. Do you now have an open air prison? Yeah. And we just sit
Speaker 1: for You take it, man. Unbelievable. There they go. There they Look at
Speaker 0: how look at how great a job our border patrol is doing tonight, stopping the illegals.
Speaker 1: For
Speaker 0: Is this the Texas National Guard? Yeah. It is.
Speaker 1: And then they were they were
Speaker 0: supposed to stop this. So here's Greg Abbott's Texas National Guard. They have done done more than anyone else. I'll give them that. But here they are watching it happen.
What a joke. What an absolute for The whole world is laughing at us. Venezuela's laughing at us. Mexico's laughing at us. For.
Oh, man. Endless money for Ukraine. Endless money for illegal immigration. Your taxes go up. Your energy prices for Go up.
Your energy gets shut off. Yeah. Your country's not under attack at all. Everything's fine.
Speaker 1: For nothing to see here. No. Don't look
Speaker 0: up Cloud and Piven. Don't look up Agenda 2030. Don't look up The Great Reset. Don't don't
Speaker 1: even you shouldn't even
Speaker 0: be here filming. There's nothing to film, guys. For Bring in a bigger truck. We need a bigger truck. Some we need the Chinese communist government to come shut us down, probably.
Too many Best of the Americans out here asking questions, filming.
Speaker 1: Wow. For Look
Speaker 0: at it.
Speaker 1: This this
Speaker 0: is just total cutlery out here.
Speaker 1: Seriously, this is just this is just whatever they want.
Speaker 0: This is just total cutlery.
Speaker 1: Are we paying or selling?
Speaker 0: For I don't know. No. I'm told this isn't taxpayer funded, so I don't know who pays their salary unless that was a lie too.
Speaker 1: Hey. What do you think? For What do I think? Yeah. I think it's bullshit.
I think it's wide open, and I think it's a it's a travesty if these guys are doing this, and they don't stand up and say we're not gonna do it for Yeah. That's what I think.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Are they disavowing governor Abbott's orders by allowing this? Right.
Speaker 1: Is this a is this are
Speaker 0: you guys disobeying governor Abbott's orders by letting this ripping.
Speaker 1: We'll we'll we'll send this footage
Speaker 0: to Abbott. He won't do anything, though.
Speaker 1: He doesn't stand for Texas.
Speaker 0: He says he was gonna stop it, and then he for sends them out here to facilitate it. Just like we told you they would. Just like we told you they would. So it's too easy. Yeah.
Just like we told you, they were bringing in the buses
Speaker 1: so that nobody could see it. For We could see it. I mean,
Speaker 0: you know?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: It's too obvious. Well, they couldn't have 3,000 people in the streets of El Paso. That was just too obvious.
Speaker 1: For so
Speaker 0: they had to clear them out. They gave them a court date for 2028. If we even have a country then
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. At this rate, we won't. Oh, I'm sure they'll be showing up for court in 2028, guys.
Speaker 1: We're gonna round up 6
Speaker 0: Actually, these guys probably don't have till 2029 to show up.
Speaker 1: 6 20 people to
Speaker 0: go to. Who knows who knows what the world will look like then?
Speaker 1: For I did a good job.
Speaker 0: Another Alright. There we go. Pipeline complete.
Speaker 1: For Guys, okay, guys. There it is.
Speaker 0: Load them up. Pipeline complete. Flush them in.
Speaker 1: Alright. This is literally human smuggling. Struggling.
Speaker 0: This is human trafficking. We are watching human trafficking. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: What you're watching is people, being taken into for custody by US border patrol agents.
Speaker 0: From where?
Speaker 1: And then and then set free. From where? Country. Where are they coming from? United States country.
Speaker 0: Where are they coming from? How many is it gonna take? How many free. Should we take? How many taxpayer money?
Yeah. 6,000,000,000, he told me. 6,000,000,000 and they're helping it. There it goes. How much cartel money are being made on this protection.
Speaker 1: There they go. Wow. Unbelievable.
Speaker 2: For Anything of real quality, anything of lasting durability, anything that's really satisfying and empowering and fulfilling for It's gonna be hard to attain. And when it comes to information, boy, is that true today? We see for The entire global corrupt anti human depopulation great reset combine trying to collapse our society to build on its ashes their for The transhumanist nightmare vision suppressing the voices of good people all around the world and of doctors and scientists and engineers first They're exposing all their lies, their COVID hysteria, their world's gonna end in 2030. Carbon tax, global warming bull, all of it. And none of it can succeed.
None of it can actually be carried out unless everybody is silenced and gaslit. For That's why truth comes with hard work and with research and with diligence. That's why for It's hard to share info wars links and banned out video links. That's why we've got to share them now more than ever.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
I am finally out of prison. Happy to be free, grateful to be loved, and excited for what’s next. My spirit is bright. My heart is full. My mind is sharpened. My soul is rejuvenated. My faith in God solidified. My faith in the American people reaffirmed. https://t.co/nklcVqTKC3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Owen Shroyer announces his release from federal prison and expresses gratitude for the support he received. He plans to share his experiences and upcoming interviews in the coming days. Shroyer thanks everyone for their prayers and the books they sent him during his 47-day confinement. He reflects on a Bible verse about prayers causing an earthquake that opened prison doors, believing it happened to him twice. Shroyer emphasizes the importance of not taking freedom for granted and expresses excitement about being back in the open world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, friends and family, Owen Shroyer here, and, yes, it's official. I have been released from federal prison. And, man, do I have a lot of stories to tell? And, obviously, I will be telling you these stories over the course of the coming days. There are a lot of big and fun interviews that I have coming up.
I will be making another statement later today as well on the Alex Jones Show and we got a lot of exciting stuff in the very near future but I just wanna take this time to thank everybody for your prayers. Thank everybody for all the mail and the books that you sent me. I was able to read 15 books in my 47 days in prison. The Jordy of my time spent in lockdown, if you can believe that. But I believe God wanted me to have this experience.
I had to see the full prison experience because I learned a lot and I've realized that there's some things that we've been missing when it comes to fixing our country and so I'm gonna be talking a lot about that but there was one particular Bible verse that stuck out to me when Paul and Silas were in prison and they talked about praying and the prayers, shook the foundations, and caused an earthquake that caused the prison doors to be open so that they could get out, and I believe that happened to me not only once but twice. Your prayers shook the prison doors open so that I got out of the special housing unit known as the shoe on the inside or confinement. It's the prison inside the prison and then your prayers. Once again, caused the earthquake that opened the prison doors for me to be released today after serving 47 days of my 60 days. I will tell you, freedom is great.
The one thing I learned immediately, never take anything in your life for granted because you never know when it can all be ripped away from you. But the fresh air, the open world. I'm back, and I'm ready to go.
@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer
BREAKING: The following is an exclusive recorded phone call with Owen Shroyer from inside FCI Oakdale prison. https://t.co/BydqCVsr3M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Owen Shroyer expresses gratitude for the support he received during his time in solitary confinement. He mentions receiving fan mail and how much it means to him. He plans to share the information on his Twitter account so that fans can continue to send him mail. Today is his first day out, although he is still in jail. He talks about the weather and how refreshing it feels to be outside. He thanks everyone for their letters and hopes to host a radio show from prison. He appreciates the prayers and looks forward to returning to live broadcasting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, Owen Shroyer here. This is the first time you are hearing from me since my speech, incarceration. And I really don't wanna get into what's going on here on the inside. I'm much more concerned about what's going on out there. But I will say, I am finally out of my solitary confinement for a week.
And I'm and blessed because your prayers have come through. Some friends helped me get through it with some conversations as well as getting me a digital radio so I had some reach with the outside world. And I was also able to follow a bit of the news via some talk shows. And we have a TV here that I'm able to tune into on the FM dial as well, and they have newscasts up as well. And of course, I could sit here and talk about all the Biden crime family corruption that McSene, the media that is obsessed with war propaganda and all the regular stuff, but that's not what I want to bring to this message today.
I've just got done reading some of the mail that has been sent to me. And to try to express how important is or what it means to me would simply be impossible. I do somehow plan to show you how grateful I am for that when I do new get out of here. But I've got to say, my shirt has grown. I've had I have to wear a double XL shirt now because my heart has grown so much from your fan mail.
And also I'm now wearing double XL pants because, well, I'll just leave that up for your interpretation. But seriously, every single letter that's sent to me, I read every word. Some of them I read twice or 3 times. I can't tell you how much they mean to me. And I'm going to reshare the information here on this Twitter account so that you can continue to send me the fan mail and uplift me.
When I'm tired, I get energy. When I'm hungry, I feel I fed, and it's all thanks to your letters. When you write them, you may not think I read them or they mean much to me, but trust me, I read them and they mean more than you could even imagine. Now again, I don't wanna get too much into what's going on here, but I have been helped along the way by some friendlies. Today is my 1st day out.
And so now my life on the outside, as it would begins. Of course, that being hyperbolic since I'm still on the inside. But when you spend 7 days in solitary, getting out and into a jail and being able to move feels like the outside. It was bitter cold today. It was sunny.
This call is from a federal prison. It was sunny the entire time I was in. And then, of course, as soon as I get out, it becomes rainy and freezing. But let me tell you, the 40 degrees wind and rain couldn't have felt any more refreshing than it did when I stepped out today. Probably just as refreshing as the sun would have felt.
But we will reshare the information. I hope you keep the mail coming. They had to bring a wheelbarrow in for me just to receive it. I'm being facetious but that was the joke the guards were making. So my life on the outside of the inside begins today.
Once again, I cannot thank you all enough for your letters. I'm not sure everything that's going on out there, but hopefully, it's encouraging. Hopefully, there's some good news. And maybe I'll be able to get a little more informed now that I'm outside and have a little more access this to news, television, and this phone call. And even though my time on the phone will be limited, I will be using it efficiently to try to reach out and send as many messages to you as possible.
I do hope to pull the impossible and maybe something that's never been done order. Hosting a radio show from a federal prison. But we'll work on that as I learn the flow of my life now on the outside. The countdown has gun. Your prayers mean everything.
Your letters mean more than you can ever imagine. I'm eternally grateful, and I cannot wait in until the day I return to being live on air with you, my friends, my family, and my fellow patriots. Godspeed and god
@OwenShroyer1776 - Political Prisoner Owen Shroyer
Owens Last Words Before He Turns Himself Into Prison #FreeOwen #FreeOwenShroyer https://t.co/od7HeOCLr3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am currently incarcerated and want to express my gratitude for the support during my 5 years of political persecution. In the next 60 days, I will work on bettering myself and coming out stronger, wiser, and more focused. I challenge you to use this time to improve yourself as well. If I can do it in here, you can do it out there. Thank you, and God bless.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Started. Well, and gentlemen, if you are seeing this video, then I am officially incarcerated. I am actually behind first of all, I can't express the gratitude and the appreciation and the thanks from my heart for all the support in this really 5 years of political persecution that I've gone through. So from all my heart, thank you for your 50 days, and in those 60 days, I'm gonna find a way to better myself. I'm gonna find a way to come out stronger.
I'm gonna come out wiser. I'm gonna come out bolder. I'm gonna come out more focused. So for 60 days, while I'm in there, I'm gonna try to improve self and become a better person. And so I offer you this challenge for the 60 days that I'm away from the next time that you see my face and hear my voice, I challenge you to become a better person.
Use this 60 days while I'm away to improve yourself. If I can improve myself in there, then you can certainly improve yourself out here. My final message to you. My loving audience. God bless.