reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Patri0tContr0l

Saved - December 1, 2024 at 1:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it intriguing to revisit Trump’s comments from November 2020 about voting machines switching votes. He suggests, indirectly, that the 2020 Election was a sting operation. He mentioned glitches where votes were moved from him to Biden, labeling them as fraud. Trump claimed they mostly got away with it, but I question that belief. He referred to the Election as the “Sting of the Century” and tweeted about glitches post-Election, implying that these were moments of being caught. If it was indeed a sting, we might soon uncover the truth about the elections and validate Trump’s claim of winning in a landslide.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

It’s interesting going back to November 2020 and listening to Trump talk about the machines switching votes. It seems like he’s telling you, without directly telling you, that the 2020 Election was one big sting operation. “We had glitches where they moved thousands of votes from my account to Biden’s account…. they’re not glitches. That was fraud. And they got caught.” He says for the most part they got away with it, but do you really believe that? After all, Trump did RT a post in 2020 that called the Election the “Sting of the Century”. Trump also put out multiple tweets after the Election talking about glitches, and even directly says when the “glitches” occurred, that was really THEM getting caught. So if it was a sting, and Trump (the military) has it all, we may be on the brink of exposing just how fraudulent our Elections have been, and prove once and for all that Trump won 2020 in a landslide.

Saved - November 24, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Here’s Pam Bondi earlier this year talking about Bill Clinton flying on the Lolita Express and saying people tied to Epstein in court documents should have their names released to the public 🔥 She is now Trump’s nominee for Attorney General. This is gonna be fun 🍿 https://t.co/pYzkb6t9L3

Video Transcript AI Summary
He traveled multiple times with Jeffrey Epstein on the "Lolita Express," which allegedly had a bed for young girls. Unlike Donald Trump, who distanced himself from Epstein over a decade ago, this individual has maintained a long-term friendship with him. There are concerns about the Justice Department's silence on this issue, especially while they label parents as domestic terrorists. Human trafficking is a significant problem, and while Epstein is dead and Ghislaine Maxwell is imprisoned, some individuals mentioned in reports are still trying to keep their names private without a valid legal reason, unless they are victims or cooperating defendants in a case against Maxwell.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we know he was on the plane, not only on the plane a couple times, multiple times, he traveled internationally internationally with Jeffrey Epstein, and he was on the plane called the Laueva Express because it supposedly had a bed in there where Jeffrey Epstein had young girls. He has been a friend of his, a continuing friend of his for years years, contrast that with Donald Trump who hasn't spoken to him in many years, over a decade, after he kicked him out of Mar a Lago for bad behavior. So that's the difference there, and I think Americans see the 2 tiered justice system. But, you know, we don't know. They're they're saying Clinton has not been to his private island, but he has traveled all over the world with Jeffrey Epstein. I wanna know why AG Garland and the Justice Department are so quiet on this tonight. You know, they're out there labeling parents domestic terrorists, yet they're saying nothing about this and these documents were so slow to come out. Human trafficking is a multibillion dollar business in this country and Jeffrey Epstein is dead and Gerlaine Maxwell is in prison for 20 years where she belongs. And if people in that report are still fighting to keep their names private, Sean, they have no legal basis to do so unless they're a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant by some chance against some potential case against Gerlaine Maxwell. And I think Mark Garrigas, as a great criminal defense attorney, will back that up as well.
Saved - November 16, 2024 at 8:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe the chaos unfolding. Andy McCabe, who played a role in the Russiagate narrative against Trump and Flynn, claims Kash Patel wouldn't lead the FBI "faithfully, ethically, and legally." He argues that Kash is unqualified, stating he has never managed anything significant. McCabe also insists that Kash wouldn't earn respect from law enforcement leaders. It feels like a desperate attempt to deflect. In the end, it seems like treason doesn't lead to a good outcome.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Oh man the rats are SCRAMBLING. Andy McCabe, the guy who helped launch the Russiagate hoax against Trump and Flynn, says Kash Patel would not run the FBI “faithfully, ethically, and legally”. That’s rich coming from him. He then says Kash is unqualified: “At the end of the day, Kash Patel is profoundly incapable of running the FBI. He is absolutely unqualified for that position. He’s never run anything in his life that I’m aware of.” Lastly, he says Kash wouldn’t receive any respect from law enforcement: “The idea that Kash Patel would walk into a room of police chiefs and sheriffs and command any level of respect and recognition is absurd.” Panic harder, Andy. Treason doesn’t pay well in the end.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Moving forward with Kash Patel's nomination as FBI director will likely provoke significant backlash. His qualifications for the role are questionable; he lacks the experience necessary to lead an organization of this magnitude. Patel has only three years of experience as a line attorney at the DOJ and has never managed or led any organization. The notion of him representing the FBI, which oversees 37,000 employees and works closely with the intelligence community, is unrealistic. It's hard to imagine him commanding respect in a room full of police chiefs and sheriffs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But in this case, moving forward with a nomination of Kash Patel as FBI director, really, it will provoke, I think, a massive amount of backlash. Now, you know, you can make the argument that that's what he wants. He wants to disrupt. He wants to, you know, provoke the ire of people like me and others who who feel strongly about the institution and what it takes to run it, faithfully and ethically and legally, none of which I think Kash Patel can do. But we'll we'll have to see. You know? I think at the end of the day, Kash Patel is profoundly incapable of running the FBI. He is absolutely unqualified for that position. He's never run anything in his life that I'm aware of. He's never managed or led an organization of any type. His entire experience in the federal government is limited to about 3 years as a line attorney in DOJ headquarters. You know, the idea of him taking on the mantle of leader essentially of the American law enforcement community running an organization of 37,000 people, 400 locations in the United States, people people serving all over the globe in incredibly sensitive capacities working with the intelligence community, and really standing as the representative of law enforcement in this country. The idea that Kash Patel would walk into a room of police chiefs, and sheriffs and command any level of respect and and recognition is is absurd.
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 11:17 PM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Wow. Jeremy Bash, 1 of the 51 intelligence officials who signed the letter claiming Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation, is now suggesting uniformed military and CIA should disobey direct orders from their Commander-in-Chief, Donald Trump. This traitor is panicking HARD. https://t.co/hytDuXmjLE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Believing in the separation of powers is essential for institutionalists. With Donald Trump potentially controlling the executive branch, the Senate, the House, and a majority of the Supreme Court, maintaining checks and balances becomes challenging. It's crucial to rely on Republican officials and justices to hold the executive branch accountable. If unlawful orders are given to the military, I trust that they will refuse to carry them out. Similarly, CIA personnel will not allow their work to be politicized; they are committed to truth. There is a loyalty to the Constitution that transcends political power, and we can have faith in those who uphold these institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Part of being institutionalist means you believe and subscribe to the view of separation of powers in our constitutional system. And you kind of hit this at the top of the show. We're gonna be entering a period in which Donald Trump not only controls the entire executive branch, he'll control his party will control the Senate, probably the House, and a significant majority of the US Supreme Court. So anybody who's taken civics understands that when you control all three branches of the government with the political party, it's much more challenging to have checks and balances. And so contemplate this at this moment, Nicole, I think we have to rely on Republicans, Republican elected officials, Supreme Court justices, and people inside government and outside government who are willing to continue to have checks and balances, to continue to, hold the executive branch accountable. If there's an unlawful order given to the United States military, I expect and I I think it will be the case that uniform military will not carry out unlawful orders. If these people try to politicize the work of the Central Intelligence Agency I know the people who work at the Central Intelligence Agency. They will not allow their work to be politicized. They will speak the truth, and the truth will set them free. That's emblazoned on the wall of the original headquarters building at Langley. There's a kind of a mode of operating, a a a view, a loyalty to the constitution that, honestly, is bigger than any other idea of who's in power, who's your commander in chief, who's calling the shots in the executive branch. And I think we can have faith in people who believe in these institutions.
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 9:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe General Flynn has a clear strategy for Trump’s potential second term, pinpointing John Brennan as a key adversary. He emphasizes the need to dismantle certain departments and scrutinize the FBI and CIA. I can envision Flynn driving efforts to hold traitors accountable.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

General Flynn discusses the ‘angle of attack’ for when Trump takes over and immediately identifies John Brennan as the enemy’s “tactical commander”. He goes on to say entire departments need to be eliminated and the FBI and CIA need to be looked into 👀 Just imagine General Flynn in Trump’s 2nd Administration. The man is determined to bring justice to the traitorous criminals. We need this to happen!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The focus should be on identifying the motives behind current issues, with John Brennan seen as a key figure. It's crucial for Trump to ensure his security, as there have been previous attempts on his life. He needs a team of dedicated individuals ready to reform the government. There’s a need to consider significant cuts to departments like Education and the FBI, and to reevaluate the CIA's role. Trump's primary economic strategy should center on unleashing America's energy potential, which could revitalize the economy. Additionally, there is a demand for a swift accountability task force to address issues without lengthy delays, aiming for decisive action within 60 days.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna go the angle of attack the angle of attack you think we is it is it is it the the CIA's FBI? Is it the legal? You gotta go you gotta start with some motive force first. Where do you go? Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I'll tell you the the the and this is my this is Mike Flynn talking. The I think that the person behind this is sort of the tactical commander of all this is John Brennan. I really believe that. And, there's Speaker 0: some other people 100%. Speaker 1: Yeah. 100%. There are people inside that that, that that, you know, are are really good. We have we have decent people, but I think John Brennan is one of the most evil people on the planet. And that man is he's the tactical commander. Obama's still in the play, and there and there are some of these globalist characters. But what we're what we're facing, number 1, Trump needs to be very, very certain of the security around him. So this is not like, I'll just depend on my secret service detail. No. You have got to make sure that he feels and he now I'm talking directly to Trump. You have got to feel, I mean, so confident that that that, you know, there's always gonna be risk, but that the people around you are going to protect you with their lives. And there's not gonna be any any, any, you know, shenanigans with the with the quality of the people or the or the numbers of resources that you're gonna need. I don't care whether it's aircraft, whether it's air defense systems, or whether it's human bodies. That's number 1 because they have already tried it a couple of times. They'll try it again between now and inauguration. That's that to me is job number 1 is for Trump to stay alive, and I mean that. I hate to say that in in our country, but but we've already you know, this is not a I'm not making this stuff up. This is already these are already things that have happened. And number 2, the people that that Trump brings around him, these have got to be warriors that are ready to go after the government and really reform. I mean, I like this idea about what Elon Musk is talking about and the kinds of things with their with this government efficiency kind of a task force. And I I do believe that there there are going to be, requirements for entire departments, like like, you know, Millet down in Argentina, Right? I mean, we have got to get rid of entire departments like the Department of Education as an example. Maybe we start looking at places like the FBI. Maybe we look at whole cost cuts within the Department of Justice, and I know exactly where to look, the intelligence community and the role of the CIA, what the CIA is is up to these days. So these are things that have to be talked about in addition to the policies. And I think the number one policy that Trump, is gonna have to go after I mean, he's he's already talked about the deportation campaign, but the number one bigger economic policy and the way that he's gonna have to attack this, and I mean attack it, you know, cutting regulations and returning this country back to the strength that we can actually achieve is energy. The energy that we have in the in the geology of the United States of America can take care of the rest of the world for 500 years. Trump knows that. You know that, Steve. And so I think turning the energy spigots out of this of the United States of America will jump start this economy so we can start to we can start to have some modicum of control, prestige, and leadership globally. You know, in addition to we haven't even jumped into the wars yet. Maybe that's another conversation for another day. But but, I I I like what Trump says, but what I want him to do to also do because there are millions of MAGA people that want accountability, and there's gonna have to be some type of task force or a commission. And I'm not talking about some commission that takes 2 or 3 years like the Durham report. I'm talking about some commission that takes, like, 60 days, has the full premature of the president of the United States, and is able to make decisions about what to do with people. May maybe maybe we end some Speaker 0: drum head trials. Just
Saved - November 6, 2024 at 10:57 PM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

💥 Kash Patel recommends Trump make sweeping personnel changes as a package all at once: DOD CIA NSA DOJ FBI TREASURY STATE AND MORE It’s time to DRAIN THE SWAMP! https://t.co/FoVyBgC5dP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The DOJ and FBI must report back to the relevant committees, with strong Republican leadership ensuring that subpoenas are honored. This requires a coordinated effort, similar to how Russiagate was addressed, utilizing Congress, the White House, and public education on corruption. The goal is to hold all agencies accountable, including DOD, CIA, NSA, and others, reflecting the mandate given to Donald Trump by the American people. Regarding Senate confirmations, the traditional approach allows for bundling nominees, as seen with Biden's cabinet. This practice should be extended to Trump, ensuring he receives the same opportunities as previous presidents. The focus is on applying the Constitution uniformly in Washington, D.C., as the public desires.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the DOJ and FBI need to be reporting back to the committees of jurisdiction where the Republicans need strong chairmen and women to go out there and say, not only are these subpoenas valid and effective immediately, you will return them. Otherwise, we will utilize the constitution to service the American people's desire to have constitutional oversight of these committees. It has to be a multipart effort, and we haven't even gotten to the judiciary, but I'll leave that for for Mike Davis. But this is how we won Russiagate. We not only use Congress. We use the White House. We use the power of educating the American public with the the corruption author's own documents from FBI and DOJ, And it can be done. Steve, just think about that. We did that at one place, in the FBI, mainly, and a little bit of DOJ. Just think about what you can do if you do it all at once at DOD, at the CIA, at the NSA, at the DOJ, at the FBI, at Treasury, at state, and the list goes on. This is what the American people voted for in Donald Trump. His overwhelming mandate was here adhered to by the by the president and that by the excuse me, by the American public. And that's what I think, in my opinion, is the way forward, a collective effort. Speaker 1: Walk me through go back. I wanna walk through, what do you mean bundle them and send them all together? We have 3,000. We can hit the deck plates running at lower levels. You got a 1,000 in each senate confirmations. You're saying take that entire package of senate confirms and put them up as a package? Put them up as, like, 12 or 15 people? Speaker 0: Well, traditionally, it's not even my idea. Every presidential candidate gets that opportunity in the 1st week of January. That's how Joe Biden's packages were moved through as a package. All his cabinet secretaries went forward at the same time, except I think one. And so they gave that, they, the Republicans, allowed for that to occur in the senate, and I think every president before him has been afforded that same opportunity. So I'm not asking anybody to recreate the wheel for Donald Trump. I'm just asking the senate and the house and the congress as a whole to follow their own tradition and pathway and allow president Trump that same exact right. Steve, that's it. At the end of the day, I don't have a revenge list. I want the constitution applied uniformly into DC and without of DC. Yeah. And that's what the American people voted for in
Saved - November 1, 2024 at 9:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media is incredibly dishonest. Trump pointed out that Liz Cheney wouldn't be a war hawk if she faced gunfire, yet they twisted it to say he suggested she face a firing squad. This manipulation proves why Trump labels them the Enemy of the People. They're desperate; if he wins, it's over for them.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

The media is so unbelievably dishonest. Last night, Trump said Liz Cheney wouldn’t be such a war hawk if SHE were the one who had to face gunfire in battle. Today, the entire media is saying Trump said Liz Cheney should face a firing squad. Watch the clip and then look at the Fake News headlines. This is exactly why Trump calls them the Enemy of the People. All they do is lie and poison the minds of easily manipulated sheep. They’re desperate. If Trump wins, it’s over for them.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand the father's loyalty to his daughter, but she lacks intelligence and is a radical war hawk. Imagine her in a dangerous situation, facing real threats. It's easy for those in Washington to advocate for sending troops into conflict from the safety of their offices. However, her perspective seems misguided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I don't blame him for sticking with his daughter, but his daughter's a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrel shooting at her. Okay? Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee, Will. Let's, send, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. But she's a stupid person
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 12:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, the Secretaries of State for Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania announced on mainstream media that they won’t have Election results on Election Night. It raises questions about why these battleground states struggle with timely results. It seems clear to me they’re planning to steal the Election again.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Yesterday, the Secretaries of State for Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania each went on mainstream media and said they won’t have Election results on Election Night. Clearly coordinated. Why is it that these key battleground states are the only ones that can’t seem to deliver results in a timely manner? It’s blatantly obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that they’re planning to steal the Election, just like they did in 2020. Vid credit to @TheChiefNerd and @TPostMillennial

Video Transcript AI Summary
The message is to please be patient as Pennsylvania counties work to count votes quickly and with integrity. The goal is to provide the truth to voters. It takes time to count millions of votes. Pennsylvania is reportedly much better prepared today than they were four years ago. Secretary Schmidt is answering questions about the electoral process. He has teamed up with former Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The message is what? Be patient with Pennsylvania? Speaker 1: The message is please be patient. Our counties are working night and day to count their voters' votes. They're doing so as quickly as they can and with integrity. Our job is to make sure we are constantly just providing the truth to voters to be a For Speaker 0: secretary Schmidt, getting out the message can mean late nights answering questions about the electoral process in granular detail. Speaker 1: It takes time to count millions of votes, and it's Speaker 0: not saw at this law school in Harrisburg. Speaker 1: We're much better prepared today 4 years later than we were. Speaker 0: He's teamed up with fellow Republican, former Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, Michigan had results from its highest turnout election within 24 hours, with unofficial results completed by 8 PM on Wednesday. This year, with more options to reprocess ballots sooner than election day, officials are optimistic results could come even sooner, estimating by the end of the day on Wednesday. However, accuracy and security will be prioritized over efficiency. While understanding the public's desire for quick results, the process will remain secure and accurate before any information is released.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How quickly do you expect to get results? Well, you know, in 2020, we had the results of our highest turnout election in Michigan history within 24 hours of the polls closing. The unofficial results were completed by 8 PM on Wednesday. So we're tracking that again this year. We do have more options to reprocess ballots sooner than election day, which is where we were restricted in 2020. So I'm optimistic we could see results even sooner, but I would estimate end of the day on Wednesday as the best guess on how we'll perform. But that said, we will always prioritize accuracy and security over efficiency, understanding how much people will want those results. Results. We're still going to make sure the process is secure and accurate before we put anything out to the public. But that said, we understand people's energy and excitement and we'll be working hard to ensure those results are ready as soon as possible.
Video Transcript AI Summary
100% of votes in Georgia will be cast on security paper with the state seal. Nationwide, over 96% of all voting will be on paper ballots. President Trump implied that delayed vote tabulation indicates something nefarious, citing France's move to paper ballots due to the US system's alleged failure. Georgia's SB 189 mandates that all early votes and early accepted ballots must have their results reported by 8 PM, potentially accounting for 70-75% of the total vote count on election night. The remaining votes to be counted after that time will be overseas ballots that come in no later than Friday. The goal is to have fast, accurate, and secure elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I understand it, nearly all votes cast in this upcoming election will be recorded on paper. Last night Speaker 1: Absolutely. 100% will be. That's actually security paper with the state seal on it. Speaker 0: Okay. Important point to establish because yesterday, president Trump said something that implies that because it can take time to tabulate votes, there might be something nefarious here. Take a listen. Speaker 2: They spent all this money in machines and then they announced, we expect to have the results like 7 days after the election. If you had paper ballots, you get them at 10 o'clock. France went to paper because what we did didn't work. Speaker 0: He's pointing to a lack of paper ballots as a problem here. Is he accurately describing what's happening, and how long will it take to tabulate votes? Speaker 1: In Georgia in Georgia, 100% of all the votes cast will be on a paper ballot. But actually, nationwide, it's gonna be over 96 to 97% of all voting in America will be on paper ballots. But we also just put into law this year with SB 189 that all early votes and all early accepted ballots, they all will have to have their results reported by 8 PM. That's 70, maybe even 75 percent of all the vote totals will be reported no later than 8 PM on election night. Speaker 0: Won't take 7 days to tabulate votes as he said? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. What we will be waiting for is the overseas ballots that come in no later than Friday. And so those will then be the final numbers, and we'll just see if that makes the difference in the total vote totals. I understand we're very competitive. That's why we've done everything since day 1 to make sure we have fast, accurate, and secure elections for all my voters here in Georgia.
Saved - September 27, 2024 at 6:59 PM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Kash Patel on the Iran assassination threat to Trump: “[Biden and Harris] are INTENTIONALLY standing down the intelligence apparatus of this country.” 👀👀👀 He says the Intel Community has the ability to shut down the Iran threat but Biden and Harris refuse to defend Trump. https://t.co/mtmrqvdwKA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers claim the Biden-Harris administration is immorally and un-Americanly allowing hacking and assassination plots against Donald Trump because it benefits them. They accuse the administration of intentionally standing down the intelligence apparatus, reprioritizing intelligence collection for climate change and DEI initiatives instead of confronting adversaries. They state that the Trump administration prevented Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb and eliminated Qasem Soleimani, while the Biden-Harris administration gave Iran $7 billion and is enabling their return to the Iran nuclear deal. They highlight Robert Malley's suspension by the FBI for mishandling classified information about Iran. They allege that the Biden-Harris regime intentionally delayed briefing President Trump on Iranian threats and only did so upon his request because they don't want to defend him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They stand back immorally and in in an the most un American way and let this happen. Hacking and assassination plots against Donald Trump because it benefits them. Speaker 1: You're absolutely right. It's disgraceful, their conduct. It might even be borderline unconstitutional. They are intentionally standing down the intelligence apparatus of this country. They are reprioritizing intelligence collections efforts for climate change and reprogramming agencies and departments based on DEI and white rage rather than what we did in the Trump administration, which is take on our adversaries head on. Iran, we shut them down from getting a nuclear bomb. And as you just noted, the Harris regime gave them 7,000,000,000 and now they have 1. The Iranians, we took out Qasem Soleimani under president Trump and shut down the IRGC in the Quds Force. And thanks to these guys, they are now halfway back into the Iran nuclear deal. And look at some of the folks that Biden and Harris have utilized for enhancing their relationship with Iran. Robert Malley, the special envoy, the super genius behind the original JCPOA has been suspended by the FBI for mishandling classified information about Iran, and we get no details about it. He gets fired essentially from the state department, and he goes off to teach at a lofty university while the American public is left blind. This type of intelligence capabilities from Iran take months months months to put out and plan, and they have the patience to do it. But our intelligence community, when focused on the threat, has the ability to detect it and prevent it and shut it down, And the Biden Harris regime has intentionally delayed and only gave president Trump a briefing when he requested it. They weren't even proactive in going and defending this man because they don't want to.
Saved - August 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

General Flynn explains how the intelligence community bribes and blackmails politicians. He says there are probably less than 5 US Senators who aren’t compromised in some way 👀 @GenFlynn @hodgetwins @TheTwinsPod https://t.co/JmbiRx1mn5

Saved - August 20, 2024 at 12:53 AM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Trump just posted a boat with WWG1WGA and 45-47 CIC (Commander in Chief) on the side 😎 IYKYK 🐸 https://t.co/QLcB4Iih9K

Saved - April 4, 2024 at 7:32 PM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

New Scavino on Instagram features Abraham Lincoln starting a tweet with “My fellow Americans…” That happens to be the start of THE tweet that Q drop 55 told us to look for: “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......." Probably just a coincidence 😉 https://t.co/6qXx63nD6S

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want a sarsaparilla. What is that?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My fellow American. That solo energy, give me that I'm gonna die, Kirk. You want anything? A sarsaparilla. What the hell is that?
Saved - March 24, 2024 at 1:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The inflation problem in the US is being attributed to regulations imposed by the Biden Administration, which increased the cost of doing business and disrupted the supply chain. Bill O'Reilly suggests that removing regulations, as proposed by Donald Trump, will provide relief to the American people.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

People that don’t understand the inflation problem in the US should listen to this easy-to-understand 1 minute explanation of why it IS Biden’s fault, and how Trump will fix it. Bill O’Reilly: “It has to do with regulations that the Biden Administration slapped on the fossil fuel industry and others which drove up the cost of doing business, and then slowed down the supply line and hurt the farmers and across the board. That’s why all Americans are paying more for the essentials of life. Donald Trump will remove almost ALL regulations, so therefore just by that action, the people will get some relief.” 💯

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump governs financially better than Joe Biden. Inflation is not a global issue due to COVID supply chain disruptions. Prices for gas, groceries, and dining out have risen since Trump left office, attributed to Biden's regulations on industries. Trump would remove regulations to provide relief to Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You said that Donald Trump would govern better financially versus Joe Biden. I'm assuming you're you're implying that you're implying to inflations. But would you agree that inflation is a global thing and that is due to supply chains being shut down during COVID? Speaker 1: Bill, no. And I never imply anything, Stefania, ever. I always just say it. So you are paying 48% more for gasoline since Donald Trump left office. You are paying 23% more for groceries, and if you are to a restaurant, more than that. That has nothing to do with Lithuania or France or Nigeria or Thailand. It has to do with regulations that the Biden administration slapped on the fossil fuel industry and others, which drove up the cost of doing business and then slowed down the supply line and hurt the farmers and across the board. That's why all Americans are paying more for the essentials of life. Donald Trump will remove almost all regulations. So, therefore, just by that action, the people will get some relief.
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 3:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today marks the 3-year anniversary of a controversial presidential election. Joe Biden, despite minimal campaigning and concerns about his cognitive decline, received a record-breaking 81 million votes. However, he lost in 18 of 19 bellwether counties and won only 16% of counties overall. Questioning these facts is often met with accusations of being an election denying conspiracy theorist.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

Today marks the 3 year anniversary of the most fraudulent presidential election in American history. Joe Biden, who barely campaigned, couldn’t get anybody to show up to his rallies, and clearly was in cognitive decline, somehow managed to receive the MOST VOTES IN AMERICAN HISTORY with 81 million, all while losing 18 of 19 bellwether counties and winning only 16% of counties overall. And remember if you question any of this, you’re just an election denying conspiracy theorist.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a series of actions taken to manipulate the American public and the election process. They mention importing a virus, blaming the president for deaths, locking down small businesses, promoting mail-in voting, inciting a race war, and shielding a chosen candidate from the press. They also mention manipulating polls, taking control of polling stations, calling off the election, and using software to ensure their desired outcome. The speaker concludes by stating that stealing the power of the most powerful republic in the world was easy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Start with the virus. Import it into America. Talk about it nonstop. Call some governors. Nah them. Nah them. That's your guys. Put patients into nursing homes. Kill 1,000. Blame the president. Keep blaming. Blame some more. Lock down small business. Kill the economy. Push mail in voting. Stoke a race war. Call for riots. Pick a candidate. No. Not her. Yeah. That's more like it. Lock him in his basement. Shield him from the press. Don't cover this. Don't cover this. Don't cover this. Keep doing that. Ignore the economic recovery. Downplay the world peace. Pump the polls. Pump. Pump. Don't stop pumping. Install your software in swing states. That was fast. Take control of polling stations. Call off the election when you're losing. Kick everyone out. Pull out all the extra ballots. Get the software to do its thing. Get the media to say it's over. Call the big tech guys. Ban anyone who notices. Act like the whole thing never happened. Stealing the most powerful republic in the world. It's that easy.
Saved - October 14, 2023 at 2:25 PM

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

.@EricTrump tells @KariLake what he’ll do when President Trump wins the 2024 Election: “I will pop the greatest bag of popcorn that day that he wins, because I’m telling you, he will upend the system like never before.” WE’RE READY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses excitement about someone winning and promises to celebrate with popcorn. They believe this person will disrupt the system and did a great job in 2016. They mention the depth of corruption and how people used to chant "drain the swamp." They criticize Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden for their long political careers without significant accomplishments. The speaker believes that this person has exposed the true extent of the swamp and its intentions. They conclude that the swamp is now seen as much deeper than just career politicians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As to him winning, I will pop the greatest, you know, bag of popcorn that day that he wins because I'm telling you, he will upend the system like like never before. I mean, he did a hell of a job in in 2016. Praise god. But but none of us none of us fully understood the depth of that corruption. You know, we all just used to chant, you know, drain drain the swamp. You remember drain the swamp? Yeah. But we're talking about Nancy Pelosi who's been in office for 40 years and has done absolutely nothing. The Joe Biden's who have been in politics substantially longer than I've been alive and I'm for it. I don't think anybody realized the swamp was a 1000 feet deep until he exposes, you know, the unvarnished kind of honesty of of his speech combined with, you know, them kind of manifesting their true intentions day after day, he was able to show America really what what the swamp truly was. Again, we used to think the swamp is just being career politicians who weren't working on behalf of the American if Mhmm. Now our British swamp is being substantially substantially deeper than that. That's no longer even a problem.
Saved - September 12, 2023 at 6:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Eyewitnesses recall secondary explosions in the Twin Towers on 9/11. Did NIST investigate these claims before concluding no evidence of explosives? Must-watch for those questioning the official fire-induced pancake collapse narrative. The truth awaits.

@Patri0tContr0l - Patri0tsareinContr0l

This is an absolute must-watch if you’re new to the questions surrounding 9/11. It destroys the “pancake collapse due to fire” official government story. Endless eyewitness accounts of secondary explosions in the Twin Towers on 9/11. Did the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) investigate all these claims before they determined there was “no corroborating evidence” that explosives were used?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple explosions occurred in downtown after the attack on the trade towers. Survivors described hearing secondary explosions and seeing the buildings collapse. One survivor, Arthur del Bianco, shared his experience of being pushed to the ground and buried in debris. Witnesses reported a bomb exploding in the lobby, followed by the planes hitting the buildings. The lobby was severely damaged, and people had to run for their lives. There were reports of car bombs or overheated cars exploding in the area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Here's one of the guys who can tell you I'm okay. Alright? Yeah. Hold on. You wanna call you wanna call your mother or something? Speaker 1: I'm gonna call you back, Alright. Speaker 0: Don't worry about me. You need to make calls right now. Alright. Go gas another. Speaker 1: Hours Hours after the attack, many smaller explosions rumbled through downtown. Speaker 2: Because once the tower fell, you heard Speaker 3: And then it's down like firecrackers. And we looked up in a second down. It's coming down. There were numerous Secondary explosions taking place in that building. There was continuous explosion. Speaker 4: She's been here a long time Speaker 2: Arthur del Bianco is one of the lucky few Able to tell a tale of survival from a hospital bed. Speaker 4: She would all of a sudden, it was like bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, like bullet shots. And then all of a sudden, 3 tremendous explosions. And everything started coming down. Speaker 2: Del Bianco was at work in the doomed trade towers when they were attacked. Speaker 4: The force just pushed us to the ground. We were pushed up against marble slabs and other people and glass and smoke. We're buried in that stuff. Speaker 2: He made it out with a broken leg and today was reunited with his wife. Speaker 1: We're We're hearing a number of large booms coming from that area. We can only guess what is going on. I got an Speaker 0: Warren Street because of the secondary explosion. We've got numerous people covered with dust from the secondary explosion. Speaker 3: And the lobby booked as though a bomb had exploded there. All the glass was taken out, there were 10 foot by 10 foot model panels that were walls. They were loose from the wall of the trade center. I went around by the freight elevator and I could see it was just blown. It was just a giant 30th floor. We hear another explosion. Speaker 0: I think a bomb went up in the lobby first, then a plane hit the building, then another plane hit the other building. And but I was coming through the doors on the other side of the trade center, something either they blew the lobby up Or something because it blew the glass out of the doors and knocked the stuff down, and I got, smoke and everything I just feel all shook up because I got blasted, you know. It's, I'm just trying to, you know I I wanted a drink of water. They didn't have any water. Speaker 5: Can you tell me what happened? What'd you say? I saw I don't know. As some windows coming out of the building and the ceiling falling on the floor where I was working, That's when we started up heading for the exits. And, we got to the 4th floor from Speaker 6: The ladies that are with me We're in the World Trade Center on the on in the 1st building and escaped through the lobby where they report that they believe there was a bomb in the lobby. Speaker 7: We ran down the steps to the lobby. There was no lobby. Everything was torn up, and even the turnstile was burnt and it was sticking up, and they just told us to run. Speaker 8: My boys ran out the office. He said one thing, run. Everybody just ran, and we ran down the stairs. They told us to come back up the stairs, and we were, Come back up to fizzling. You crazy? So we continued down the stairs. We came outside the lobby. There was no lobby. The lobby was totally gone. Did you see other people? People. There's a woman named her face blown off. And as we Coming out, we passed the lobby. There was no lobby. So I believe the the bomb hit the lobby first and a couple of seconds in the first plane. Speaker 2: Yeah. Hi. I am just about, Between 5 10 blocks north of the actual site of where those 2 towers have come down, we're obviously having a bit of trouble right now Maintaining our location because we just heard 1 more explosion. That's about the 4th one we've heard. The police are telling us they're either car bombs Or they are, simply cars that have overheated so much that they're exploding.
View Full Interactive Feed