TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @PatrickByrne
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Venezuelan defector explains that SMARTMATIC & DOMINION election systems are DESIGNED to be both porous and difficult to audit after-the-fact. https://t.co/SOGHz4jffh
Video Transcript AI Summary
In general, would you say that Smartmatic software was designed with two principles in mind? Number one, it's easy to rig elections. Number two, it's hard to audit. That is correct.
And is the same true for Dominion software? It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit. That is correct.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In general, would you say that Smartmatic software was designed with two principles in mind? Number one, it's easy to rig elections. Number two, it's hard to audit. That is correct. And is the same true for Dominion software?
It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit. That is correct.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
The DOJ has sent "a letter of interest" saying they are looking into the railroading of Tina Peters. PS I drop some hints about non-public information. https://t.co/2Vu4xsmolM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tina Peters, a gold star Navy Seal mom and former Mesa County, Colorado recorder, is imprisoned with a nine-and-a-half-year sentence after a conviction. She became suspicious of election systems after unusual April 2021 county elections. When Dominion was sent to work on her county's machines, Peters preserved records, leading to the Mesa County number three report.
The DOJ filed a statement of interest regarding her case, citing concerns about the lengthy sentence, First Amendment implications, and denial of bail. The DOJ is reviewing cases nationwide for abuse of the criminal justice process, including whether Peters' prosecution was politically motivated rather than pursuing justice. The speaker claims Peters had a duty to preserve the records, and her actions revealed significant fraud. The speaker alleges the judge ran a kangaroo court, preventing the admission of evidence of fraud uncovered by Peters' actions. A key witness allegedly lied on the stand, with the judge and prosecutor reinforcing the false testimony. The speaker urges financial support for Peters through TinaPeters.US and vouches for the integrity of the Lindell Offense Fund, stating that no money was taken for personal use.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The railroading of Tina Peters by a cowardly kangaroo court in Colorado and and a recent DOJ letter examined. I warn you this is gonna be PG 13 because I can get a little Irish when I talk about this situation with Tina Peters. This is what Tina looks like. The quick backstory on Tina, I'm not gonna review everything I've gone through, but she's a gold star Navy Seal mom, meaning her son, a Navy Seal, died while serving our country. She's from Mesa County, Colorado, which is Southwestern Colorado.
It's rural, steep in the mountains. She ran for county recorder in, I think, 2018 on the grounds that people drove too far to the DMV, and she wanted the DMV to have office in her county. She didn't think and the county recorder is just a job that you you make sure that records of the county are kept. It's and just a a woman trying to give back. Just a woman in her sixties, a widow trying to do something for her country, and not some big political she didn't think 2020 was stolen.
I tell you how non MAGA she was. She didn't think it was stolen. She just she heard all of us talking about it, and she thought that can't be. These machines are secure. Something happened four or five months later.
The April 2021 county elections were very unusual, and that I think I think the facts are there were four people that four of them lost, and all four were very popular long term people. And they all lost to brand new people who had just moved in the county no one had heard of, and it all seemed kinda strange. So on that basis, she started tuning in and getting suspicious, joining us in our suspicion about these election systems. As a result of that, when she learned that some George Soros politician types were sending Dominion to do something on her machines, she had a federal duty of to preserve that Rose records for twenty two months. And so she brought in a certified court forensic guy secretly to make a copy so in case Dominion came in and tinkered with what was on the machine, it could be exposed.
And they did come in and tinker. They didn't just tinker. They deleted everything and completely reconstructed and created a fake a fake image to put on the machine to hide. It's a big cover up. For doing what so she just did her job, and her doing so led to the Mesa County number three report, which was very useful to us in unscrambling this huge thing.
She was but for doing so, she was railroaded by some corrupt forces and is now and has been for four months sitting in a Colorado prison with nine and a half years to serve in a total kangaroo court conviction. If you wanna aid her financially, go to TinaPeters.US. You go there. There's a link. That's her site.
There's a link on it to Gifts and Go. Go and send $10. It makes a difference. Send a hundred bucks if you can. Now here's the big development.
The DOJ on March 3, '2 weeks ago, filed a statement of interest in Colorado regarding this case, and this is what it looks like. I'm gonna go walk through it briefly. So, you know, it's not me, just crazy Pat Byrne raising these questions. The United States Department of Justice is looking into what I'm about to tell you. Basically okay.
So miss Peters is currently incarcerated while pursuing a direct appeal of her underlying nonviolent convictions and combined nine year sentence. Reasonable concerns have been raised about various aspects of miss Peters' case. These concerns relate to, among other things, the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the first amendment implications of the trial court's October 24 assertions relating to miss Peters, and whether Colorado's denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable in view of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Okay. So what this what this and then also, end the the letter or near the end, they also say parallel to these proceedings and missus Peters' direct appeal, the Department of Justice is reviewing cases across the country for abuse of the criminal justice process.
See a letter Pam Bondi wrote two weeks after she got an office about restoring the integrity of the DOJ. This review will include an evaluation of the state of Colorado's prosecution of miss Peters and in particular, whether the case was oriented more towards inflicting political pain than pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives. And that's pursuant to something Trump signed, executive order signed the day he came to office, January 20, ending the weaponization of the federal government. So what they are pursuing in sum, what the DOJ is pursuing is this. The case should never have been brought.
The case should never have been brought because, a, nothing she did was illegal. In fact, she had a duty to do it. Her job was to preserve the county records, and she preserved the county records. And it turns out if she had not done what she did, the county records would not have been preserved. She had that duty under state law.
She had that duty under federal law. She did her duty. She did her duty, and it was absolutely right for her to do. And the fact that she did her duty allowed us to really it was a big puzzle piece. The fact that we had that original original image of the hard drive before Dominion got to erase it is a a big puzzle piece.
The conduct of the judge was execrable. It was terrible. It was a kangaroo court. Well, first of all, like, the charges were all shaped were all shaped to avoid the fact that because of what Tina did, huge fraud was revealed. Huge fraud was revealed.
They've covered it up. The everybody's covered up because we can't get it in the court. The judge would not let in the court the fact that because of her actions, whatever they were, this monumental fraud of national security import was revealed. Nope. Can't that can't because the charges were all crafted like, well, to bring to bring that computer expert in, you had to so she wanted her own chief technical officer to make an image, like, of the hard drive before Dominion came in.
The guy wasn't up to it. It's not a court certifiable image. His name was Jerry. He wasn't up to it. And he said, he was all for doing it.
He was all excited. He thought it was defending the county records, but so they got in an expert, a guy named Conan. And he came in and they gave Jerry's ID to him, and Jerry gave it to him. And Conan dressed up like a computer nerd and went into with Tina's help, went into the county computer offices and made this secretly made this image. So when the bad guys showed up to cover everything up, they wouldn't know that there was already a a perfect image of the hard drive.
So as they changed everything, they would be caught. So she had to do that surreptitiously. She got Conan in, and she had this other person's badge to badge in. It's funny. Conan called me as this was going on.
First I heard about it. He was sitting in the county offices doing this, and he called me on FaceTime. And he was dressed like a computer nerd. It's only funny because Conan happens to be one of the most famous surfers in history, one of the pioneers of big wall, big wave surfing. He's also a Brazilian judo jujitsu black belt.
So he's tough as nails, but he was all dressed up in a plaid shirt, buttoned up glasses, a pocket protector, a badge that said Jerry. And just like this little computer nerd in this county office, and he's just a cool cat. And he did this on instructions from the county recorder, and it's her job. Well, Jerry was threatened by the prosecutor and said, you need to say that you didn't know anything about this and you didn't give your permission. And that let them bring against Tina claims that he had lied to her, that he'd misused his ID, blah blah blah.
Jerry went along with it. And when he got on the stand, he said, I didn't know a thing about any of this. And that's a flat lie. And when before he sat down, our lures got up with texts he had sent, which showed he knew all about it. He was all excited to be part of it, blah blah blah, completely undermining his testimony, showing that he had sat there for a day lying through his teeth to the jury.
It just flat lie to the jury. Begin and here's the text that proved. He knew all about it. He was he was in favor of it. He was happy about it.
He was excited to be part of it. But so this guy, you've never seen a witness caught in a lie like this guy. He just sat there with his flums yapping. He couldn't think of anything to say, and he finally just says, well, I I don't remember. I don't remember sending that that text.
What kind of defense is that? He gets off, and the prosecutor tells the jury now sometimes when there's a conflict between somebody's memory and the documentation, you might just wanna you know, you might think that the fellow's memory is more reliable than the documentation. And the judge reinforced that to the jury. So his lies were countenanced. We could they could Tina could not get him back on stand to do more.
They play these games to get him away, so he couldn't be brought back on the stand. And this explored more, but he was caught in flat lies. And not only did the prosecutor then tell the jury to ignore it, the judge told the the jury basically indicated go with the prosecutor. Well, come on. You got the guy's text showing he knew all about it.
He was happy about it. He was excited about it, and he agreed to give his ID over. And yet the same guy just sat there saying, I didn't know a thing about this, and I didn't know my ID was being used. Yeah. Go ahead and believe his word, not what his email show.
Okay. So the judges the judge ran the trial that way. In fact, the judge just the fact that the judge wouldn't let Tina have all kinds of defenses like my actions, whatever they did, expose this huge fraud. Nope. None of that could be admitted.
So the judge and the prosecutor worked hand in hand to make this this kabuki dance so she could be tried only on these crazy little nothing issues rather so that would keep out the main event, which was what was found. So his lies were countenanced, and then he as well as a number of places in this trial. He just was judged was committed absolutely what I'm told is absolutely appealable error. Black and white was absolutely way over his ski tips. Secondly, at sentencing, he showed such enmity for Tina.
Enmity for things she had done that were clearly within her constitutional rights, like being part of the public discourse on this. So his speech at sentencing really would give you the impression that he was not a fair minded jurist. In addition, the sentence was unjust. So this is what in legalese, this is what that legalese in the DOJ letter meant. This is what they're looking at.
This stuff as well as the denial of bail. So Tina Wall, this is on appeal, which will take a year. She's appealed this. So I have a 70 year old woman sitting in a cold solitary cell. Typically, would want if that's on appeal, you would let her out while it's all on appeal.
And if it's all upheld, then then you bring her back into prison. You let her out for a dollar. She's she's not gonna she's a 70 year old woman, ties to the community, nowhere to run. You don't want her sitting for a year in jail when the chances are quite possible that after a year of reviewing it all, the judge the appellate court says, no. None of this conviction should have stood to begin with.
Then this old woman, elderly woman, you've wasted a year of her life. How many does she have left? You're wasting one sitting in a jail cell while you work it out. Well, that's wrong, and yet she was denied bail on a while this is all on appeal. Very strange behavior at a Colorado court.
And if I were involved, this would be the pucker factor sentence from that DOJ letter. Accordingly, The United States, by which the DOJ means the DOJ, respectfully submits that the concerns raised in this application warrant at the very least warrant, at the very least prompt and careful consideration by this court and at the appropriate time, the Colorado appellate courts. This is what the DOJ is saying there. The DOJ is saying, you don't wanna ever get that's the that's the letter you get from the DOJ that makes body parts start shriveling up in in uncontrollably. That's your pucker factor.
The DOJ is gonna crawl up the ass of the Colorado judicial system for railroading this woman, for all the things I've just described. The case should never have been brought. The conduct of the prosecutor was wrong. The conduct of the judge was wrong. Crazy things happened in the courtroom that should never happen in a fair minded court from witnesses being told, oh, you believe what the witness said.
Don't worry about what his email say. And to the way the judge talked to Tina, to the way everything was wrong about it. And we, the DOJ, they're basically saying mind your p's and q's and we're gonna be going through all your all your stuff. So my friendly advice to that Colorado DA prosecutor Dan Rubenstein and then Colorado judge Matthew Barrett, my friendly and humble advice is lawyer the fuck up. Lawyer the fuck up.
You don't know you're about to get fisted by the DOJ. You're gonna find out what it's like to get fisted by the DOJ. I told you. I told you all it was going on. You should mind your p's and q's.
You know why they didn't, folks? You know why they didn't? And why all these democrats acted like they did over the country and even the rhinos? Because they thought November 5 was in the bag. Everyone thought that was in the bag for Kamala Harris.
No one all their plans relied on that they were gonna win. And they thought they were gonna win because they had it rigged again. They had it rigged again. Something happened that neutralized their rig. You're gonna be learning about it someday.
But that's why these guys acted like a they ran a Stalinist kangaroo show trial in front of the media a few weeks before the election because they thought that that that Kamala Harris had no chance of losing and nothing would ever be examined. So they violated all kinds of judicial precepts and how they kangaroo this woman into prison for nine and a half years. And now, guess what? November 5 didn't go the way they thought. And there's a true DOJ who's returning us to rule of law and they're now examining everything you did, Rubenstein, and everything you did, judge Barrett.
And I'll let you know a little secret. I have some of your communication that you don't know I have. I have some of your communication and I got it. Why? Because there's other lawsuits I'm involved in that turned over material to me and some of your communications were in those other lawsuits and I have it.
And as a concerned citizen, I think it's only I mean, I think the DOJ should read about what you guy what was going on behind the scenes. I just as a concerned citizen, it would be an anyway, well, let's see if the DOJ subpoenas me for it. If they subpoena me for it, I I I don't know what I can do but turn it over to them. And I think so just Rubens I Rubenstein in particular, I have some of your back channel communications, and I can tell you prepare to get fisted. Go on a porn site, and if you know what that means, go on porn site and put in fisting and look it up.
You're about to get find out what it's like to get fisted by the DOJ, and I believe you too, judge. So go lure the fuck up. You're embarrassments to the legal profession. It's about times when we make an example out of YouTube, but they don't even need to go after you to make an example. They just need to apply the law and that and they don't have to stretch the law.
They don't have to play the games you play to make an example. They just have to tell the truth and reveal the truth. You'll be an example for decades of what you did, you punks. Okay. So that's the story on Tina Peters.
Last thing I wanna tell you. We're financing Tina. We want any help we can get from the public is great. If you wish to help her, go to tinapeters.us. There you will see a link on her website so you know it's the right one to gift send go slash tina peters.
That's where you wanna send money to help. Now, I understand in the last week there's some snot, spit, and tears in the universe about the Lindell Offense Fund. I know some of the people involved and I'm gonna vouch. And listen, I'm you know, since I'm underwriting all this and I've put 2,000,000 of my own money I I think so far or the America Project has to help Tina, no one wants the money to be more accounted for and correct than me. But just, you know, Mike Lindell was raising money, help me help Tina.
I because I know some people on that fund and I've talked to them. I can assure you there's good controls. None of that money was taken for personal use. There's no chance any of that money was taken for personal use. Some of that money was paid directly to Tina Peters lawyers.
Other of that money was paid to experts. We have experts or there are experts all over the country digging into different things. And some of those experts were directly related to Tina's work and some of them were not. I understand. I'm not part of the Lindell Offense Fund.
But and but, anyway, it's it gets kinda murky. I mean, you could argue that any the money that didn't go to her lawyers directly, a bunch of it still went to the experts who are working through the technical side of this, and maybe some other money went to other experts who are fighting the broader battle. It gets kinda gray. But anyway, you can be sure the main event is you can be sure none of that money was taken and put in anybody's pockets. And I vouch because I know one of the gentlemen involved, and he described to me all their controls.
And I'm confident that none of that money was taken and put to any private use. However, we all agree going forward, if you wanna help Tina, go to TinaPeters.US, and you will see the link there to Gift Send Go. You click that, and you can go make a donation and anything. She's on appeal. We're going to it's going to appeal.
Please help Tina Peters send a few few shekels. Thank you very much.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Folks, this is not a bug. It’s a feature. They’re doing what they did for 1400 years. They migrate, then nudge, push, shove. They are now at the “rape women not wearing hijab” phase to humiliate your men. Next phase: submit, move away, or… Fight back against the savages.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Correct. And the strange artifact they found they could not trace? I tell you now: it was a office in Serbia that came in through a port, set up a virtual server in the RAM of the election system, manipulated data, then disappeared in a puff of mist, then closed the connection.
@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand
WOW: Tina Peters backing up the elections data before they wiped the systems gave the public a rare opportunity to analyze before and after the tampering — and it shows clear and deliberate manipulation of the voting systems. -Audit trail deleted -System logs deleted -Voting files replaced with new files Now we know why the Democrat Judge in her case refused nearly all of her witnesses and excluded virtually all of her defenses, then sentenced her to 9 years in prison — because if this became a nationwide story the entire house of cards with Dominion could fall. @realtinapeters
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
The Patch IS the Rig! Michigan Shenanigans SoS Benson admits MI machines have huge glitch, need "nationwide patch". Town Clerk knows the patch IS the rig, files Emergency Suit to stop patch, do handcount. Heads explode. RT America Project $5/month https://americaproject.com/become-a-member/
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a significant issue in Michigan regarding voting machines that allegedly flip Republican votes to Kamala Harris when voting straight party line. Secretary of State Benson announced a need to patch these machines, raising questions about their prior federal certification. The patch is viewed as a method to manipulate results remotely. An attorney, Stephanie Lambert, is working with local officials to prevent this patch and instead advocate for a hand count of ballots, emphasizing the importance of maintaining constitutional order. They filed a lawsuit to stop the patching process, arguing it poses a threat to election integrity. The Secretary of State is attempting to move the case to a court she controls, highlighting concerns of corruption in the process. Support for grassroots efforts to combat this issue is encouraged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team Freedom. The patch is the rig part 2. This is what's going on in Michigan. Earlier this week, the secretary of state Benson, a Soros goon, came out and said, we've discovered this glitch in the machines. If you vote straight party line Republican, it it flips your Trump vote to Kamala Harris.
Well, yeah, I would guess I would call that a glitch. They just discovered it. And she's saying the way to fix this, we need to patch all the machines in Michigan. In fact, it's nationwide. They all need this to download a patch.
Okay. Well, the first thing you need to ask is if it did that, how did it ever get a federal certification to begin with? How did it ever pass logic and accuracy testing? That's a little odd. Second thing you need to know is to patch is the rig.
This is what Dominion does. They do it all over the country, all over the world, frankly. This is in this is in smart medic, and this is what they do. They get run up to the to the election where if they've really had eyes on them, they've had to have machines get certified and sealed. They get right to the election, and then there's some little glitch that's discovered, and they need to download a patch to fix it.
The patch is the rig. It opens up a backdoor on the system. They then can access it from their offices in Serbia, and they can manipulate the results any way they want. And I've explained in other videos how they do that. They create within the machine a virtual machine.
They come in the back door, use the virtual machine, manipulate the hard drive, the results, anything they want. When they're done, they just collapse the virtual machine, close the connection, and there's nothing you can find. There's no trace, unless you're, like, really forensically getting the bits and bytes. That's the technique. They've used it all over the country and around the world.
The patch is the rig. That's how they come they, you know so I said, they've said the second the Soros plant has said, we need to patch all the machines in Michigan and actually nationwide. Well, Stephanie Lambert, an America Project attorney, who's most wonderful honey badger attorney in the country on this stuff, has been working with the Irving Township of Barry County, Michigan, and got a lawsuit filed and an emergency injunctive relief. And there's a graphic, associated with this tweet that you can see. I don't know if AI did this.
A guy named Braden, something, sent it to me. Maybe he did it. It's wonderful. And I'm not gonna walk you through in great detail, but the the the anatomy of the lawsuit is given in this graphic about who the parties were, the core issue that the machines have been discovered, reported to have a nationwide glitch. And that's the Democrat Soros Goon is saying that affecting straight line voting, the legal authorities.
They have already said, Braid at Benson and the director of elections, Braider, in Michigan have already said the town clerks have, don't, the town clerks have the authority over the machines, not not them. When they need to, they say, oh, it's not our problem. It's their problem. No. So the clerk one of these clerks said, okay.
We wanna prevent that patch. We don't want our system packs. They brought in Ben Cotton, a very serious cybersecurity guy. He's giving great expert analysis, how it's impossible to patch these now, the constitutional duties, the threat that the patch is doing just what I've said it does. And I know for a fact that's how it works.
I've been over in Central Europe dealing with these people and tracking this all down. The relief is don't let them patch. We wanna do a hand count. We just wanna hand the town clerk is saying we just wanna hand count our ballots like we did in the old days, like we've done for centuries, and tell the Michigan Secretary of State to stay out of this. You've and make a give a restraining order that says these machines our machines aren't gonna get a patch.
They're not gonna be patched. We're just gonna do a hand count like we've always done in the public interest in maintaining constitutional order, the time sensitivity that we got 3 or 4 days before the election. You can't download a patch. How can you possibly certify any of this now? And that's what they've said.
They filed this in court. The secretary of state has freaked out. She has freaked out about this. She wants this to she wants this to be she they they are adamant. We need to download this patch on equipment that's already shown it was falsely certified.
It has this already shown it was falsely certified. It has this enormous error in it, and they need she's saying we need nationwide to download this patch. Well, that patch is the ring. And, it's just kinda funny at this point. So and last night, Friday night at 7:15, the the secretary of state got into court a an argument, who stay what you know, when did they work late?
When did they start work? But an argument that said, no. We're trying to move this town clerk's case for a restraining order, move it to some court that she controls. So corrupt. It's closed circles of corruption.
Thank you. Hey. Support the America Project. Stephanie Lambert and our attorneys are the people out there at the grassroots fighting this. Help us out.
Help a brother
Become a Member | The America Project
Join The America Project By becoming a member of The America Project, you’re joining a dedicated community committed to safeguarding our nation’s core values and freedoms. Your support enables us […]
americaproject.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
BAD NEWS: Harris - Obama privately smirking, 100% confident in victory. "Don't believe polls or what you read, election already in the bag." Harris Transition Team 100% staffed with Obama staff. Republic being overthrown. Our 1 chance = overwhelm rigged machines. Retweet! https://t.co/YoS1f5h0GQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris's team is reportedly very confident about their chances in the upcoming election, dismissing concerns about polls. They believe they have everything under control, with a transition team composed entirely of Barack Obama's former staff. Sources indicate that they are not worried at all and are even preparing for a successful outcome. The message is clear: they feel assured in their strategy and capabilities. However, there is a call to action for supporters to mobilize and ensure a strong turnout, emphasizing the importance of being proactive in the face of potential challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Folks, I've got some bad news for you, and I'm gonna give it to you straight. I have sources inside the Kamala Harris operation, and I can tell you this. As of this morning, Kamala Harris and her people are 100% confident. They're not in the least bit worried. They are 100% confident, and they're saying, do not worry about it.
Don't worry about the polls. Don't listen to the polls. We are we have this in the bag. And the Kamala Harris transition team has already been staffed, and it's all Barack Obama's staff. It's Barack Obama.
It's his entire staff. I mean, the entire transition team is Barack Obama people, and they are not in the least bit worried. They're they're 100% confident. And that's the word that's reached me from somebody extremely well placed, extremely well placed that they know and trust. And and I've been told it's actually shocking how confident they are.
It's almost with a little smirk that they're saying, do not believe anything you're hearing. We got no problem at all. Wait till you see what happens. They are and it's because they are 100% confident in the ability of of the machines to they can make these machines stand up and whistle Dixie, as I've told you before. The only way to defeat this is with a massive turnout.
I swear to God, I'm not doing this to manipulate you or get you worried unnecessarily. I'm telling you they are not in the least bit concern. They're cool as cucumbers, and they they believe they have this in the bag and do and do not believe in. And there's no no worries at all about what the polls say, what they say, what the this election has done in their minds. They're picking out drapes for the White House.
Then I'm the least bit concerned. You know what to do. Share this video, and share this video and get out there. Get, you know, the lives look, I've lived in communist countries. You guys have no idea what's coming for you.
You're gonna regret to your dying day, which may be sooner than you think. If you do not get out now and give this not just the old college try, it's time to go teeth, toes, and fingernails. They are 100% Kamala Harris' team is not in the least bit worried. They are 100% confident that they're winning this. And the transition team is all Barack Obama.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
If Tina Peters got nine years for “endangering election security“ for showing one blurry “password123“ in a video, how much should Soros Goon Griswold get for compromising 63 out of Colorado’s 64 counties?
@AsheinAmerica - Ashe in America
In the event of a password breach, step one is to change the password. The state department took four days to change the passwords and didn’t inform the clerks of the breach until after the story broke. This is a cover up. https://coloradofreepress.com/fact-check-jena-griswold-spreads-disinformation-on-kyle-clarks-next/
Fact Check: Jena Griswold Spreads Disinformation on Kyle Clark's "Next" - Colorado Free Press
This interview seemed painful for both of them, tbh.
coloradofreepress.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Jenna Griswold just broke the 2024 Election in Colorado. Results are now 100% non-certifiable and anyone who says differently is lying. "History repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce." - Marx https://t.co/3YNFb8rQrZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A significant security breach occurred in Colorado, where partial passwords for voting system components were mistakenly published online. These passwords are crucial for the security of the election systems across 63 counties. The BIOS passwords serve as a master key, controlling access to the hardware settings. Despite claims from the Secretary of State's office that there was no security issue, the passwords' exposure poses a serious risk, allowing unauthorized access to the voting systems without physical presence. The situation raises questions about the certification of the 2024 election results, as the integrity of the systems is compromised. The lack of accountability for those responsible further highlights systemic corruption, rendering the election process in Colorado fundamentally flawed. A forensic audit is necessary to assess the extent of the breach, but such audits are currently not permitted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team Freedom. Today, it only hurts when I laugh because there has been a leak of passwords in Colorado that makes the that breaks the 2024 election. It is now completely meaningless. Do not let the computer jargon scare you. I've designed this short talk so my mom could follow it.
Okay. Today, Newsweek, story appears, Colorado publishes voting system passwords in major error. The office of the Colorado Secretary of State, who's a Soros plant, Jenna Griswold, has said partial passwords for the voting system components were mistakenly, posted on an official website and a and a spreadsheet that was and a spreadsheet that if you if you took in, you and it was to the public. If you unhid some columns, these passwords became available. The spreadsheet contained more than 600 partial BIOS passwords.
Again, don't let the jargon throw you. I'll explain in a moment. For voting system components across 63 of 64 counties, the passwords are a core component of computer security, of security control for a computer system like a master key that controls access to the basic hardware settings. Okay. I'm going to explain this again with no jargon.
What is BIOS? BIOS stands for basic input output system. Okay? It is the firmware on a computer that bridges the hardware and software. It performs functions at system startup.
What that means, your computer hardware is when you open it and you see the actual, you know, chips and and boards and stuff. That's the hardware. The software is the programs you use, like the bridge program or the chess program you play. Well, in between, there's in between hard and soft, there's firm. And that stuff that comes right on the system and it starts right at startup when you turn the computer on and it knows to wake up and activate this and download or and upload this Microsoft Windows program and just to do the basic things to set the computer up so you can use it.
Let me show you what a how accounting election system looks. And, again, don't let these these diagrams tell you. It's really simple. It's simple if you just follow along. Every county runs this election.
At the center of it, there's the election management server. That's the central tabulation of the votes. You've got these components like you have tablets. And when people walk in and vote, those votes are getting passed on to the that central server. They also have what are just really scanners.
And as the votes come in by mail, the ballots come in by mail, they get tabulated and sent down to these servers. Now the whole thing is protected. The bios starts up on that central server, opens up Microsoft operating system and and creates a network, and that network has security to keep anyone from coming and hacking in. But just for belt and suspenders, there is an additional encryption. So there is and what that means is as these different system components talk to each other, not only is the whole thing protected by Windows, but internally, each pieces they're talking to other pieces all are speaking in the special coded language that's encrypted.
So they so they tell us, and they leave something out. On the scanner in the system, they leave in the key to the encryption. They leave the keys like putting in a burglar alarm in a house and then writing on a stick and pacing in the window what the code is to the burglar alarm and a huge breach of cybersecurity principles. They leave that in the open on the scanner. What that means is if someone gets on the system, they can use that key to unlock all the components, which means there goes your encryption.
Now suppose somebody can make that system stand up and whistle Dixie. He can make that system spit out any results he wants it to spit out. Okay? Here's a whistleblower email that came into someone near and dear to me. Starting yesterday at 5 PM, there was a 45 minute Teams call where the deputy secretary of state, Janet Griswold, did not participate.
Many of the clerks said they heard about the password leak from their election judges. The judges questioned why the secretary of state did not inform them immediately of the problem. The assistant said that a voting system vendor, won't say who it was, alerted the secretary of the state to the problem last Thursday. That would be a week ago. They acknowledged that the secretary of state never notified the clerks of the problem.
Before breaking the news today, the statute and s secretary of state rules require clerks to file an incident report of any such breach in within 24 hours. Said it was not a security issue because no unauthorized persons had physical access to the machines. This is a big lie. I'll I'll explain why. I really just explained why.
They they don't need the physical access. If they've broken if they've done if they have the BIOS password, they turn off that force field. They grab the key. They open up all they don't need physical access. It's a big Bill said that the counties affected are using Dominion 5.135.17 who did not upgrade their equipment.
They said it was not a security leak because no unauthorized person had physical access. They don't know that whatsoever. You also said that the county's effect okay. The secretary of state, if the question is, if the passwords are changed during an election because of insecurity and no audit is performed to determine if anyone access the system, how can that system be certified? How can the results be certified?
The short answer is it can't. It absolutely cannot be certified. At this point, Ford, this anyone who says they can certify the Colorado election of 2024 is talking to his hat. I just need to point out that how 2 tiered 2 tiered justice works in this Bolshevik takeover. Tina Peters Tina Peters, 68 year old grandma, she, a town clerk, accessed her system and, I mean, what she had the legal right to do, and she discovered things like the password was password 123.
I'm making that up. It was slightly different. But she discovered it was pass when she got tried, she was tried for you could see in a video blurably that was made public that you couldn't even see what the password was. But she at the trial was deemed so sensitive to the judge that they could not even the defense could not even show the jury that the password was password 123. That's how it comes from the factory.
Meaning, no one there's nobody's putting in a password. Nobody's doing anything all over the nation. The passwords like password 123. They couldn't even show that at trial because it was so sensitive. Of course, they what they didn't wanna show, the jury was how absurd it is that they have a password that just comes from the factory, password 123.
She's doing 9 years 9 years for that. Okay? This pig secretary of state, Jenna Griswold, just compromised 63 out of 64 Colorado counties. They were compromised. Those but those passwords were compromised.
Investigator Cannon, who who took down Tina Peters, if Tina got 9 years for revealing in a blurred video password 123, how many does the secretary of state get for compromising 63 out of 63 out of 64 counties? My guess is nothing none because it's all corrupt, and it's so corrupt. The press is gonna go along with this line of, oh, this doesn't mean anything. This no. The entire Colorado election is meaningless at this point.
No one can tell you at all what happened on that. Unless they do a forensic audit, which, of course, no one's allowed to do, no one can tell you at all. Coke scripts could have been planted, and they were. And this election is completely broken. Of course, that's their purpose.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a six-part video series titled "How Cuba & Venezuela Conquered the USA," which covers significant topics like the rise of Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's Bolivarian Revolution, and the government's transformation into a mafia. It also discusses the Smartmatic technology and its global implications. The final post includes a full, uninterrupted talk summarizing these points. Additionally, I provided a resource for documentation supporting the claims made throughout the series.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
HOW CUBA & VENEZUELA CONQUERED THE USA A 6-post thread (each post = 7 minute video). A semester's class yet brisk & easy-to-follow. Retweet as if your family's & nation's life rely on it. (Last post = full talk no interruptions) Chapter 1 of 6: The Rise of Hugo Chavez
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today's lecture covers the "Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States," focusing on Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution. The lecture will discuss the 1998-2001 revolution, the 2002 counterrevolution, the 2004 recall election, Chavez's consolidation of power, and the rise of a mafia super cartel in Venezuela. According to the speaker, the best businesses in Venezuela are oil and elections.
The speaker claims to have met with Venezuela's superintendent of cryptocurrencies in 2018 to discuss the Petro coin. He also claims familiarity with Marxism, communism, Chinese revolutions, and the Bolivarian Revolution.
The lecture states that Venezuela's reliance on oil since 1922 led to economic booms and busts. A Marxist left movement emerged in the 60s and 70s, influencing Hugo Chavez in the military. In 1992, Chavez led a failed coup and was imprisoned. After release, he used the phrase "poor Eora for now." In 1998, Chavez campaigned as a man of the people and won the presidency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Today's class is on the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America or Fidel and Hugo's Excellent Boulevard Adventure. I'm going to compress a semester down into 1 brisk lecture. Feel free to use the rewind button. What you're about to learn is the backstory on Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the Bolivarian Revolution of 90 8 to 2001, the 2,002 counterrevolution and counter counterrevolution, the failed recall election of 2004, the period where Hugo Chavez tightened his grip on Venezuela, the emergence of the mafia super cartel that has taken over Venezuela in the last generation, the 2 best businesses to be in in Venezuela and they are oil and elections.
And lastly, who are the people behind the people behind this adventure? Why should you listen to me? I'm a guy who got known for selling toasters on the Internet. Right? Well, if you look up the official Instagram page of the Venezuelan government, March 6, 2018, that link, you will see someone you recognize.
That is I. And what that language says is today, the superintendent of cryptocurrencies, had an important reunion with founder and CEO of Overstock, Patrick M. Bern, one of the greatest visionaries and entrepreneurs of blockchain in the world. This meeting was to exchange the big ideas about our contribution with Petro coin to the, and the to the benefit regarding the benefits and impacts of on it's on international and international trade. Okay.
So and she didn't really speak it too well either. And in addition, I say, Saudi con un Mujer Venezuela, fabuloso, fabuloso, fabuloso. And in fact, she used to make love to me in Spanish, which I thought was the most passionate thing in the world until the night she made love to me in Italian and it blew my mind. But, In addition, back at Dartmouth College, besides studying philosophy, Western philosophy up to and including Marx, I also studied Chinese and in 1983, 'eighty four, went to China. It was just 7 years after the great Cultural Revolution.
My point being that for what it's worth, I know something about Marxism and communism and China and communist revolutions and cultural revolutions and Hugo Chavez and and the Bolivarian Revolution of Venezuela. Take that for what it's worth. Here's the young army officer, Hugo Chavez. By all accounts, he was unremarkable as an officer, as a young man. Now, Venezuela has had this great reliance on oil which was discovered in 1922 and it never really diversified much.
And when countries do that, they they get booms and busts associated with the price of that commodity. So, they've had these booms and busts and now create big dislocations and such. So, there's been there was an emergence in the sixties seventies of a Marxist left movement in Venezuela. By the eighties, it was in the military and Hugo Chavez fell into that. In 1992, Colonel Hugo Chavez at the time attempted a coup.
It did not go well for him that, he tried to take over the presidential palace. He and his his coup coconspirators ended up, captured in the presidential palace. Hugo and his men went to prison. He got out of prison after just 2 years and it started repeating this phrase, poor Eora for now, poor Eora. And without really being too clear what he meant, but this is what he said as he came out of prison.
Something like in South African today, there's some very hard line ANC politicians, you know, radicals on the left saying, we're not calling for the extermination of white people yet. For now, we're not calling for the extermination of white people. No promises about the future. In a similar tone, Hugo Chavez came out of prison saying, poor order, we're gonna follow the law, we're gonna follow the constitution, poor order for now. In 1998, Hugo and his wife there on the on his left shoulder, campaign for president, real man of the people.
He won, the presidency late 99 98, took office in early 99.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Chapter 2 of 6: Venezuela's Bolivarian Revolution
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hugo Chavez initiated a "Bolivarian" revolution, characterized by populism, anti-American sentiment, and focus on the poor. He disliked constitutions, viewing them as impediments to his ambitions. In 2002, a middle-class-led counter-revolution, joined by some military, briefly ousted Chavez for 47 hours. The CIA was not involved; the US had even warned Chavez of a potential coup. A deal brokered by the Catholic Church reinstated Chavez, but the coup plotters were later imprisoned and mistreated.
By 2004, despite a recall referendum triggered by 20% of the electorate and polls showing only 30-35% support, Chavez won the referendum with 58% of the vote. Subsequently, Chavez, mentored by Fidel Castro, consolidated his power, abandoning constitutional constraints. By 2012, even Human Rights Watch criticized the concentration and abuse of power in Venezuela. Chavez died the following year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And he began what we would call a Bolivarian pot a strong man revolution. Simone de Beauvoir was the great liberator of South America, of Northern and South America and he drove the Spanish out. And ever since, Bolivarian politics has been sort of a a populism to the point of demagoguery. It's us against them, it's driving the Europeans out, Yankee go home, very anti American in sentiment. And now and he he did some good programs there focusing on on the poor and education and things like that.
But really, the thing with these kind of folks and their politics is they have these grand ambitions of how they're going to change and improve things. And they really don't like constitutions too much because constitutions shackle them in their ability to make what they go through with what their grand plans are. In fact, Thomas Jefferson said that it is because that free government is founded in mistrust and not in confidence. He used the 9th the word jealousy which in the 18th century meant mistrust. Mistrust and not in confidence because it is mistrust that causes us to bind down governments and and statesmen with constitutions.
That's the point of the constitution. So when the new guy comes in, he's got these grand ambitions that was gonna change and improve everything, he gets he gets bound down some. He can't just, you know, he's not the the so these kind of folks in general, especially on the left, don't really like constitutions. And, he did some things to erode the constitution as quickly as he could. In 2002, a counter revolution set up against him and it was middle class basically.
Middle class pushing back as as well as poor, pushing back parts of the military sided with them. They took the presidential palace. And Hugo Chavez was held for 47 hours by what was in effect a junta. Now, incidentally, the CIA was not behind this. I have this on good authority.
In fact, the US got wind of it about a week before and the ambassador went and warned Hugo Chavez that they had wind of perhaps some coup being plotted, but they were uncertain. The the chief of station of the CIA at the time was a female. And I've been on good authority that when the coup went off, she was actually spend her time running around the embassy trying to document. She had nothing to do with it. The CIA had nothing to do with it.
It really was these this popular uprising and some generals who didn't like that they had this, that they had this gen that this generalismo was just, you know, was trying to was becoming too authoritarian and disrespecting the Constitution. Now, they held him for 47 hours and negotiated instead of killing him. There's an old saying, when you go to kill the king, you gotta kill the king. They didn't kill the king or the generalissimo. They actually reached a deal.
The Catholic church and in particular, a certain archbishop or cardinal or something, Venezuelan archbishop in the Catholic church, maybe it was the Papillon, I don't know, he was a poo ba of the Catholic church, got a a mass uprising against the people who had, who had taken power. And a deal was negotiated with Hugo Chavez to release them and return things to status quo ante and we're all gonna go on together and go forward and he was supposed to have learned his lesson. In fact, there was a TV appearance where he met on the TV with the coup plotters and they all hugged it out they all hugged it out. That didn't work out and he he was released. Oddly enough, that didn't work out too well for the coup plotters.
Jeez, you can't trust the South American general, who can you trust? They all were very shortly thereafter picked up, thrown into prison, tortured mercilessly for years to death in prison, a couple of them escaped. I think last I heard they were driving Ubers in Houston that there is something now. So in 2004, there was I'm sorry, where Hugo was back in power from 2,002 on, it was just out for 2 days. But in by 2,004, there was great discontent.
In fact, there was a there a clause in the Venezuelan constitution that I think he may have put in there that said if 20% of the electorate ever signs a petition, they can recall the president in the middle of his term. And they in 2003, that happened. 20% of the voting age Venezuelans had signed a referendum recalling him. So there was if 20% would sign it, there was real and his support by 2,003, 2004 was down to 35%, 65 against him, 35, really 70, 30, 30 to 35% of people supporting him. And he faced this referendum.
Does Venezuela in 2,004, does Venezuela recall Hugo Chavez from the pull him out of the presidency? And in August, they had they held the referendum and even though his support in poll was only at 30 to 35%, what happened was he actually won with 58%. 58% said, no, we don't wanna recall Hugo Chavez even though his support in polls only showed at 30 or 35%. He actually got 58% once the referendum was held. So, put a pin in that.
We'll be coming back to that. So, at that point, Hugo wasn't gonna mess around with any of this Tom Fuller anymore. He cements his hold on power turning to his great mentor Fidel Castro for tips. Now, Fidel Castro was a if you don't know who Fidel Castro, all Americans should know Fidel. And if you don't there's plenty of Cuban immigrants around, you can ask about how Fidel Castro has remained in power, and his brother after his death and so forth and how the Cuban regime has remained in power.
If Hugo Chavez was, as I recall, he was a bastard, That certainly in a sense of he was a real bastard. He was a real tough, you know, being kind of guy. But I think he was an illegitimate son or he was the son of the maybe the son of the housekeeper. I don't know. But son of the maids, he was rejected by his father.
So he had what Schrensch would call this great narcissistic wound. And Fidel filled that playing the role of the father figure to Hugo Chavez and really was his mentor and taught him how to stay in power after that. So there was no monkeying about with, with referendums and couches and so forth. And such that and he tightened his grip such that by 2012, the year before his death, even the Human Rights Watch, which is thought of as rather left Human Rights Organization was writing, talking about the concentration and abuse of power in Chavez's Venezuela. And he died the next year.
Let's switch subjects now.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Chapter 3 of 6: The Mafia That Became a Government
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Venezuelan mafia, Cartel de los Soles, is named after the sun symbols generals wear on their shoulders instead of stars. The mafia is essentially the Venezuelan government, with generals as capos. The US DOJ has mapped out its org chart, including figures like Vice President Tariq Adesimi, who is connected to Hezbollah and Iran, and Diasdato Cabello, a close friend of Hugo Chavez and head of the National Assembly.
Many members are allegedly "macho gay," while Chavez reportedly abused his power by raping the wives of his generals. The cartel seized control of PDVSA, the Venezuelan Oil Company, looting $2-4 trillion, leading to starvation and cannibalism in the country. They also seized CNE, the National Electoral Council, to ensure they remain in power perpetually. Jorge Rodriguez, a psychiatrist, is considered the mastermind behind the regime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We turn now to the subject of the Venezuelan mafia. It is called Cartel de la Soles or Cartel of the Suns, suns as in it's a bright sunny day. Here's why it's called that. In most nations, a general in the military has stars on his shoulders. For example, a 3 star general, which is a friend of mine.
But in Venezuela, the generals have sons on their shoulders. So for example, the chief of staff of the military, Vladimir Padrino Lopez, is a 5 son general. And in Venezuela, they refer to the mafia as the cartel de los soles because the capos of the mafia of Venezuela are in fact the generals of the army, of the military. And the which is to say that the mafia is the government of Venezuela. Venezuela is where mafia cartel turns into nation state as a matter of fact.
So, this cartel of the sons, cartel of the soldiers, that's this reference to our generals are the heads of the mafia, has been mapped out carefully by the Department of Justice. You can find org charts of the mafia of Venezuela. And it's mostly members of the military, but also other important politicians, the head of the National Assembly, and certain other figures within Venezuela. They are the mafia of they are the government and they're the mafia of Venezuela. It's it's both the mafia and they is is the government and vice versa.
You can actually click around and explore online the org structure of the mafia of Venezuela, thanks to the US DOJ. I'd like to draw your attention to just a couple names there. One of them is Tariq Adesimi, who was the vice president since 2017. He's a Lebanese Shia and by that, by meaning Hezbollah, meaning Iran. So that's one important thing to know that hez that Iran Hezbollah has been integrated into the government of Venezuela.
That's one thing going on. The other thing the other name I wanted to draw to your attention is Diasdato Cabello who was a close friend of Hugo Chavez and while he was alive and still an important figure there and the head of the National Assembly now. Something to know about this mafia and these generals and I feel I don't want to be accused of being a bigot to say this, but it would be remiss of me not to mention this. A whole bunch of these folks are gay. Now it's a type of gay that I don't think we have in the US where it's super macho gay, so macho that they look at men who shag women as as like a weakling.
It's a poof only poofter would I real tough guys, they shag men. So a whole bunch of these fellows are gay. Now they have wives and families and for social appearances, but they, they're actually gay. And yet Hugo Chavez would regularly come over to their homes, of the homes of his own generals in the evenings and rape their wives in front of them. And it was not a, it was a power thing, an alpha wolf thing.
I mean, alpha woman keeping his his truths in line. And although they were gay, I can't imagine they liked that too much. So this is a rough crowd. This is a rough crowd. This one fellow who went to the he he went to the fact and said, I'm gonna I'll release secrets of the Venezuelan regime if you come after me.
They grabbed his brother, they snatched him and they carved him up, they cut him into pieces alive, videotaped it all and sent it to the guy's mother as I'm wanting to keep your mouth shut. So that's the kind of people we're talking about here. Now, this is I just want to mention that the American left at one point embraced all these people like, I think a whole bunch of them were bribed to do so. I've been told, but one I don't think was bribed to do to do so was Noam Chomsky who has a long history of embracing lefty tyrants. If you go back to the late seventies, wrote a couple of books basically Khmer Rouge who were saying, well, we probably shouldn't believe these stories we're hearing about them.
It's probably all propaganda. And in the early days of early years of this regime, he was down there and, you know, they they love Noam Chomsky. I guess, I understand of late or later he sort of said, well, I didn't know that they were gonna be so authoritarian. That's because he's doesn't understand the point I made earlier about constitutions. You know, these social justice guys come in with great strong ambitions of how they're gonna change the world and and redraw the world unbounded, the present unbounded by the past or something.
And by and so they don't like constitutions but once and that's why they break up constitutions and dissolve them and reinterpret them until they're meaningless. And any student of history knows that, of course, absolute power corrupts absolutely, right? And that's just something so it's kinda silly for Chomsky to keep on embracing lefty social justice people who turn become tyrants and then say afterwards, well, I didn't know they were gonna be tyrants. Yeah, you did. When they that's why they get rid of constitutions.
So this is a tough crowd. Is and kind of my favorite among this rogue's gallery is Jorge Rodriguez. I think of him as Venezuela's doctor evil. Do you remember Austin Powers doctor evil? $3,000,000 Well, Jorge Rodriguez is a psychiatrist in the mold of Hannibal Lecter.
His sister incidentally is the Delsey Rodriguez is the vice president. He's really, as I understand it, the great mind that the great grand master chess player in the regime who has plotted and thought of really, it's it's his genius that is behind the story I'm telling you. Jorge Rodriguez, I hope we get a chance to meet in some circumstance sometime where we're not gonna kill each other, alright, because Beechmer just wants to really understand this a lot better. It's it's a I'll be showing you a clip of him short later in the in the presentation. So two things you, need to know about the Venezuelan mafia.
They seized 2 power bases. The 2 most important things to own in Venezuela. 1 is they seized control of PDVSA which is PDVSA stands for Petroleos de Venezuela SA or the Venezuelan Oil Company. Venezuela is the largest oil reserves in the world. It's bigger than Saudi Arabia.
But unlike the Gulf, and I happen to be in the Gulf as I speak, the Gulf of Arabia or the Persian Gulf depending on which side you're on, the here, there's a there's fortunes and there's a lot of rich leaders and stuff, but they actually seem to have some sense of that they wanna build their country and make things better for their people. In Venezuela, the mafia just sees its oil reserves as something to loot. They just loot. And by all accounts, they've looted somewhere between $2,000,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000,000 from Venezuela. While, when I was there in 2018, there was starvation, there was cannibalism, but the regime, the mafia, but the regime has looted 2 to $4,000,000,000,000 depending on who you talk to.
Now, if so, that's one important thing they seized. The other important thing they needed to seize was if you've got this great gig where you've got the world's biggest, you know, gas station under under your feet and you're able to just loot it for trillions, the other thing you need to take control of is besides the oil company is CNE, which stands for the Consejo Nacional Electoral, the National Electoral Council. That is that's how you make sure that you're not voted out of office, that you get this in perpetually, that you that this gas station that you're looting called Venezuela, you get to own it and you never get kicked out. So now let's move on to another branch of our story.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Chapter 4 of 6: The Venezuelan Super-Weapon Smartmatic
Video Transcript AI Summary
Smartmatic was founded in 2000 by Venezuelan engineers Roger Penate, Antonio Mojica, and Alfredo Anzola, who moved to Coral Gables, Florida, and filed as a Delaware corporation. Anzola was later killed. Penate was recently indicted by the DOJ.
The company was allegedly created to develop a computerized election system for Hugo Chavez to rig elections. In 2003, Smartmatic found a solution with Olivetti, an Italian company that manufactured lottery terminals. The architecture of lottery terminals, wired to a central computer, could be adapted for a national election system.
The speaker suggests that an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals might be tempted to put a backdoor in the system for rigging purposes. This system was then allegedly used in Venezuela, potentially explaining how Hugo Chavez won a 2004 referendum with 58% of the vote despite polling at 30-35%.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Smartmatic. Now Smartmatic was founded by these 3 general gentlemen, Roger Penate, Antonio Mojica, and Alfredo Anzola. It was founded in April, they moved to Coral Gables, Florida in 2000 and they filed at Delaware. They're Venezuelan engineers, they had a small software company in Venezuela from 97 just made like a home automation software, something benign. But in 2000, they moved to Coral Gables, Florida, they file a Delaware corporation called Smartmatic.
Now later, they were to say that this was done in response to hanging Chad's thing. Well, no, because that that this was done in April of 2000. They, and this fellow Alfredo, Anzola, he not after not so many years, I should mention he got he had an affair with one of the wives of one of the people, one of the mafioses. I forget who. It may have been Diisato Cabello.
I forget if he's one of the gay ones or not, but it wasn't a smart thing to do for him and he got erased. So really and Roger Penate, there's recently just a few months ago, the DOJ, United States DOJ brought an indictment against Smartmatic including Roger Penate. So he's sort of out of the picture. But Antonio Mujica is still alive and well and on the streets of London. So, let's go back to they were sent in 2000 to Boca Raton.
They found Smartmatic and, and as a Delaware corporation. By the way, the American Journal is saying, well, we looked at this. This is a Delaware corporation. It has nothing to do with Venezuela. Yes.
3 Venezuelan immigrants who with cartel backing who came to Florida and started a company and filed the incorporation documents in Delaware. That's how deep or superficial, American journals are. They can't see past well, the incorporated is a Delaware company. That's not Venezuela. Okay.
They were tasked with this issue. How do we come up with a let's come up with a computerized election system that for Hugo Chavez is that he can rig and stay in power. So he never has any of these problems again. In 2003, they found their solution, Olivetti. Now, old time, an Italian company.
Now, old timers may remember this device called a typewriter. By 2,000 and Olivetti was, when I was a kid, was one of the big names, not the biggest name in typewriters. But by 2003, typewriters didn't have much of a future and Olivetti had moved into a new game, a new business and that was they were manufacturing lottery terminals. See the, the brand? This is an old Olivetti lottery terminal.
Now, in lot of nations, how lotteries work is kiosks, and a kiosk is, well, like a 711, a small store, that's what it's called in most parts of the world, a small store that sells tobacco and milk and things like that, chewing gum and newspapers and lottery tickets. And in a lot of nations, there there are machines that these terminals that sell the lottery tickets and machines are all wired together to 1 national computer that the lottery is held on. Now, I don't want to cast and the the the smart medic guys figured out that you could take that architecture and it mapped on perfectly to running a national election instead of having 5,000 kiosks with lottery terminals and then wired into a central lottery computer, national lottery computer, you have 5,000 or whatever voting precincts each with a computer in it and they're all wired to get with a terminal in it, they're all wired together into the national election computer. And and so the the architecture of the one system mapped on, and was perfect for creating creating what they wanted to create a national computerized election system. Now, at the risk of casting any aspersions on our good Italian friends, which I don't want to do, I love the Italians.
But I have to point something out and I'm gonna do that by telling you Ronald Reagan's favorite joke. And he would get in trouble if you told this today, but Ronald Reagan told this at a like a Friendly Sons of Italy luncheon 40 years ago. The joke concerns a cock fight which is that thing where guys bring roosters with razor blades while, you know, on their feet and they fight as a cockfight. It's a 3 part joke. So pardon.
You wouldn't tell this joke tonight, but I'm just reporting what Reagan told 40 years ago. How do you tell there's a Polish person at a cockfight? Because somebody enters a duck. How do you tell there's an Irishman at the cockfight? Because somebody bets on the duck.
But how do you tell that there's an I how do you know that there's an Italian at the cock fight? The duck wins. The duck wins. That joke's funny because well, let's just say it may be possible that an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals, an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals might be tempted to put a backdoor in the system so that the president of the country of where whatever it was sold could hold a lottery and could make sure it was rigged so that, you know, his brother in law's neighbor won the lottery and then there's kickbacks. May just be the case that an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals, one might suspect that.
I don't know. Which means if you take that system and you take it back to Venezuela and you build a turn it into a national election system where the terminals are in every voting precinct and tied to a national election computer, you might be able to rig it. Maybe that has something to do with why Hugo Chavez in that referendum of 2004, though he only showed himself having 30 to 35% in the polls, actually won 58% of the vote. That might be possible. Okay.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Chapter 5 of 6: How Smartmatic Subverted the World
Video Transcript AI Summary
The cartel, mafia, and Hugo Chavez recognized an "edge" in election machinery. Smartmatic bought Sequoia, injecting intellectual property, and Diebold's hardware was also involved. Dominion, Heart IntraCivic, and ES and S use Smartmatic's intellectual property via Sequoia and Diebold hardware.
Dominion's Democracy Suite 5.5 is Smartmatic software rewritten in C#. This originated from Venezuela's National Election Commission under Chavez and Fidel Castro. Through acquisitions and licensing, this became the core of major election systems globally. Smartmatic has a factory in Taiwan assembling computers with components from mainland China, controlled by Xi Jinping.
Smartmatic allegedly lies about its supply chain, with Iran acting as paymaster, using oil transfer pricing to bypass banking systems. Jorge Rodriguez implied Venezuela rigged elections in the US, Europe, and South America, threatening to expose this if pressured. During a vote by the Organization of American States, some South American countries abstained.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why should you care about any of this? Because what happened subsequently is the cartel, the mafia, Hugo Chavez figured out this was a real edge. And Smartmatic next bought an American election machinery company called Sequoia, the old mechanical like, I first voted on as a kid and which was just getting into computerized systems in 20 years ago, they bought them. In addition, the company Diebold whom you know today, they make ATMs. They've made ATMs all my life.
Anywhere you see ATMs, you always see Diebold. But back 20 years ago, they also own a division that made election machines, voting machines. Here's a report of Fortune Magazine story from the time. And they had their voting machines. They were in they were forced by the Department of Justice under Eric Holder to divest their voting machine division.
And, Smartmatic bought Sequoia and they injected their intellectual property in it with a licensing agreement. They gave licenses to all their all their election rigging stuff. And between the Sequoia and the Diebold voting, hardware, the software and the hardware, the following happened. Now, you know when you go buying a laptop, if it's not a Macintosh, if you're buying a PC, be be it HP or Dell or Lenovo, when you buy one of those, they have those brand names on the outside but inside, the operating market today are Dominion, Heart IntraCivic and ES and S. Whichever one of those you buy, on the inside, you are getting this marriage of of Sequoia, of Smartmatic intellectual property via Sequoia and the Dominion, I'm sorry, the Diebold hardware which all got married together and it's, it's actually in these different machines.
As a matter of fact, there's a and now, they've been renamed the old Smartmatic Election Management System. God changed his name somewhere along the line to General Election Management System. Dominion has something called they call their software Democracy Suite 5.5. It's all Smartmatic. It's all Smartmatic.
Dominion took Smartmatic which was written in c plus plus and they just wrote c sharp, the language called c sharp. They wrote it, rewrote it as in c plus plus but it's the same module by module, line by line, it's the same software. And why that's important is, remember, that was a spun out of the CNE, the Consejo Nacional Electoral, the National Election Commission in Venezuela, which is under the thumb of Hugo Chavez and his mentor Fidel, the Venezuelan mafia, and the grand master of this strategy, doctor Jorge Rodriguez. Saying that differently in this order, that is to say that Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, dictators and the Venezuelan mafia and Hannibal Lecter, doctor evil of Venezuela, doctor Jorge Rodriguez, besides capturing the National Oil Company of Venezuela, captured the National Election Council of Venezuela which created a commercial go to market vehicle called SmartMatic, which through a series of corporate acquisitions and licensing agreements and divestments of of hardware of a different company, got all married together and that became the guts of these of the 3 major election systems used today, not just in the USA, but in the world. As a matter of fact, Smartmatic has a factory in Taiwan.
And that factory has this one production line. And at the end of the line, the box has come off and they get the label screwed on. Are they Dominion? Are they Heart? Are they ES and S?
But it's from one factory in Taiwan and just these different brand names. And but with all this Venezuelan junk software in it integrated into this hardware. And why that should be especially concerning is that production line isn't really manufacturing those computers. It's just assembling them out of components and the components come from the most important components come from a factory 60 miles outside of Beijing in mainland communist China. And that means they're under the those components are brought into are brought into the system, are brought into the factory in Taiwan in Taiwan and which just assembles them.
And that is means it's all under the thumb of Xi Jinping, emperor for life of China. And why the US government doesn't know this besides being indolent or corrupt or indolent and corrupt is these companies have been lying about their supply chain. Smartmatic has been lying about its supply chain and how they get away with it is Iran, the mullahs of Iran play a role and they act as paymasters. So wherever so they keep certain payments that would reveal this. They keep out of the banking system and out of the swift system so you can't see it.
And it's done through a transfer pricing mechanism run through Iran in oil. So if one guy needs to make a $10,000,000 payment to another agent in the supply chain instead of one wiring the other money which could all be seen in the international banking system, transfer pricing payment systems is like Iran sells 1 party a shipload of oil at $10,000,000 less than they should charge and they sell somebody else down the supply chain, a shipload of oil at $10,000,000 more than they would normally charge and that effectively is a $10,000,000 transfer. It it creates a it's effectively a $10,000,000 transfer of wealth between the two but there's no record of it in any banking system. It just shifts that money. So, that's how the payments are managed in the supply chain and it's kept out of the eyes of the United States government.
This all sounds a little hard to believe. Let me show you something doctor Jorge Rodriguez said just couple months ago in on July 28th this year, Venezuela had an election and it went kind of oddly because the polls showed them down 80 to 20. The regime only had 20% support and they just ended up sort of canceling their normal way of of lending the public see the election results as they developed and they just came out and canceled it all and said, we won 51 to 49. And all bunch of nations including 16 American Organization, OAS Nations, Organization of American States, challenged this election. The Carter Center said, FUI, Europeans, all kinds of people have said this is a fake election.
Jorge Rodriguez went on television and said as follows. So what is he saying there? He's saying I think he's intimating that if any of your countries push us, Venezuelans, too hard about this, we're gonna start talking about the elections of the United States and European countries and these different, South American countries, I think what he's suggesting is he rigged them all. He rigged them all. And if you folks talk to if you push us too hard on us, we're, we got a lot we're gonna open our mouths.
As a matter of fact, the in the the Organization of American States needed 18 countries to vote to take action to vote against this, not to recognize their election. 16 did vote against them. 3 or 4 abstained. And what do you know? It's just the countries, the South American countries he just named.
They abstained from the vote. They sat back. So I think that was a not so veiled threat from Jorge. Do you see why I say I kinda I'm kind of intrigued by this this guy?
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Chapter 6 of 6: Punchline & Summary
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the last 20 years, the Venezuelan mafia, with assistance from China and Iran, has been rigging elections in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. This has changed the arc of history. The speaker provided the backstory on Hugo Chavez, the Bolivarian Revolution, and the emergence of a Venezuelan super cartel mafia where oil and elections are the best businesses.
The speaker claims responsibility for any felonies committed and refers to a letter, referencing his book "Danger Close." The speaker states Venezuela has put a $25,000,000 bounty on his head, revealed during a legal issue with Hunter Biden. He requests security to return and face any charges.
He urges the DOJ to reflect on whether they have similar protections. He asks Americans to share the video and sign up for $5 a month at americaproject.com to help fund the unraveling of this situation. He calls it the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So here's the punch line. Here's the summary and punch line. Over the last 20 years, the Venezuelan mafia, with the assistance, direction, and funds from China and Iran, has been rigging elections at various levels from mayors and prosecutors to governors and congressmen and senators and presidents, judges in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. This is so Chinese.
The ultimate victory is to win a victory without firing a shot. They've changed the China and the Venezuelan communist dictators have changed the arc of history across 72 nations over 20 years through this technology and we just see the world changing out from under our feet and don't understand why. That's why. So what you have learned is the backstory on Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the 98 to 2001 Bolivarian Revolution, the 2002 counterrevolution and counter counterrevolution, the failed recall of Hugo Chavez in 2004 has turning Venezuela into pure dictatorship, the emergence of a super cartel mafia that has become the Venezuelan government, the 2 best businesses to be in in Venezuela, oil and elections and why, and who were the people behind the people behind this adventure. PS, messages to the DOJ and to real Americans.
To the DOJ, first, let's save time. I take responsibilities for any felonies or active wars that may have been committed. This entire project is on me. I've got a letter. Will 12 American will 12 Americans in a jury box think that I'm covered by this letter?
And if you wanna know what I mean well, I I get, if you want to know what I mean, look my up my recent book Danger Close which explains what I mean by I get a letter. I've got to have security though to come I'll come back anytime, and face face the rap for this. I gotta have security. Why? Venezuela has put a $25,000,000 bounty on my head.
Can't imagine why. And I was keeping this to myself but I'm in a little legal squabble with Hunter Biden and I had to reveal this. Hunter Biden didn't show up for depositions, he insisted doing it by Zoom. So I said the same thing, I wanna do it by Zoom and they didn't wanna let me do it. And so I had to file something under seal with the court that explained that I've had 2 governments now warned me that Venezuela has a $25,000,000 bounty on my head.
There's mafias all over the world looking for me. And Hunter Biden deliberately took that and his lawyer took it and filed something not under seal they quoted from it. And then so so it was filed, not under seal and then the press got it and it's been written about in Newsweek several weeks ago. So every bad guy in the world knows that there's a $25,000,000 bounty on my head. So, if you want me to come back DOJ and face the wrath for any of this, I'll be happy to.
There's I get I get security. I look forward to it. But may I respectfully suggest that maybe you should reflect on whether you folks have letters. I'm the only guy on my side of the table who knows what the expression truth and reconciliation means and wants a peaceful outcome to this. I I really am.
I don't so maybe you should folks should think about your your letters. Okay. Messages to real Americans, help a brother out, share this video everywhere. We got 2 weeks to make a difference. And go to americaproject.com and sign up for $5 a month.
Americaproject.com. Unraveling all of this and getting to the bottom of it has cost tens of 1,000,000 of dollars. I'd like your help. It's not too much to ask. Go to americaproject.com and sign up for $5 per month.
I hope you have enjoyed this tale of the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America or Fidel and Hugo's excellent Bolivarian adventure. Thank you.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
HOW CUBA & VENEZUELA CONQUERED THE USA Bonus: The full 46-minute talk in uninterrupted format
Video Transcript AI Summary
The lecture covers Hugo Chavez's rise in Venezuela, the Bolivarian Revolution, and the emergence of a mafia super-cartel. In 1992, Chavez led a failed coup, later emerging to win the presidency in 1998, initiating a "Bolivarian" revolution. A 2002 counter-revolution briefly ousted him, but he returned to power. By 2004, despite low poll numbers, Chavez won a recall referendum, solidifying his power with Fidel Castro's guidance.
The "Cartel de la Soles," composed of military generals, effectively became the Venezuelan government, looting billions from the country's oil reserves. The two key assets seized were PDVSA (the national oil company) and CNE (the National Electoral Council). Smartmatic, a company founded by Venezuelan engineers, created computerized election systems that helped Chavez rig elections. Smartmatic acquired Sequoia, injecting its intellectual property and merging with Diebold hardware. This technology is now found in Dominion, Hart InterCivic, and ES&S election systems. Components are manufactured in China, with Iran facilitating payments to obscure the supply chain. The speaker claims this Venezuelan mafia, with Chinese and Iranian assistance, has been rigging elections in 72 nations. He urges viewers to share the video and support americaproject.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Today's class is on the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America or Fidel and Hugo's excellent boulevard adventure. I'm going to compress a semester down into 1 brisk lecture. Feel free to use the rewind button. What you're about to learn is the backstory on Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the Bolivarian Revolution of 90 8 to 2001, the 2,002 counterrevolution and counter counterrevolution, the failed recall election of 2004, the period where Hugo Chavez tightened his grip on Venezuela, the emergence of the mafia super cartel that has taken over Venezuela in the last generation, the 2 best businesses to be in in Venezuela and they are oil and elections.
And lastly, who are the people behind the people behind this adventure? Why should you listen to me? I'm a guy who got known for selling toasters on the Internet. Right? Well, if you look up the official Instagram page of the Venezuelan government, March 6, 2018, that link, you will see someone you recognize.
That is I. And what that language says is today, the superintendent of cryptocurrencies, had an important reunion with founder and CEO of Overstock, Patrick M. Bern. One of the greatest visionaries and entrepreneurs of blockchain in the world. This meeting was to exchange the big ideas about our contribution with Petro coin to the, and the to the benefit regarding the benefits and impacts of on it's on international international trade.
Okay. So And she didn't really speak it too well either. And in addition, I say, Saudi con una Mujer Venezuela, fabuloso, fabuloso, fabuloso. And in fact, she used to make love to me in Spanish, which I thought was the most passionate thing in the world until the night she made love to me in Italian and it blew my mind. But, In addition, back at Dartmouth College, besides studying philosophy, western philosophy up to and including Marx, I also studied Chinese and in 1983, 84 went to China.
It was just 7 years after the great cultural revolution. My point being that for what it's worth, I know something about Marxism and communism and China and communist revolutions and cultural revolutions and Hugo Chavez and and the Bolivarian Revolution of Venezuela. Take that for what it's worth. Here's the young army officer, Hugo Chavez. By all accounts, he was unremarkable as an officer, as a young man.
Now, Venezuela has had this great reliance on oil which was discovered in 1922 and it never really diversified much. And when countries do that, they they get booms and busts associated with the price of that commodity. So they've had these booms and busts and now create big dislocations and such. So there's been there was an emergence in the sixties seventies of a Marxist left movement in Venezuela. By the eighties, it was in the military and Hugo Chavez fell into that.
In 1992, colonel Hugo Chavez at the time attempted a coup. It did not go well for him that, he tried to take over the presidential palace. He and his his coup coconspirators ended up, captured in the presidential palace. Hugo and his men went to prison. He got out of prison after just 2 years and it started repeating this phrase, poor Eora for now, poor Eora.
And without really being too clear what he meant, But this is what he said as he came out of prison, something like in South African today, there's some very hard line ANC politicians, you know, radicals on the left saying, we're not calling for the extermination of white people yet. For now, we're not calling for the extermination of white people. No promises about the future. In a similar tone, Hugo Chavez came out of prison saying, we're gonna follow the law, we're gonna follow the constitution, for now. In 1998, Hugo and his wife there on on his left shoulder, campaign for president, real man of the people.
He won the presidency late 99 98, took office in early 99. And he began what we would call a Bolivarian pot a strong man revolution. Simon Bolivar was the great liberator of South America, of Northern South America, and he drove the Spanish out. And ever since Bolivarian politics has been sort of a populism to the point of demagoguery. It's us against them.
It's driving the Europeans out. Yankee go home, very anti American in sentiment. And now and he he did some good programs there and now and he he did some good programs there focusing on on the poor and education and things like that. But really, the thing with these kind of folks and their politics is they have these grand ambitions of how they're going to change and improve things. And they really don't like constitutions too much because constitutions shackle them in their ability to make what they go through with what their grand plans are.
In fact, Thomas Jefferson said that it is because that free government is founded in mistrust and not in confidence. He used the 9th the word jealousy which in the 18th century meant mistrust. Mistrust and not in confidence because it is mistrust that causes us to bind down governments and and statesmen with constitutions. That's the point of the constitution. So when the new guy comes in, he's got these grand ambitions, if that was gonna change and improve everything, he gets he he gets bound down some.
He can't just, you know, he's not the the so these kind of folks in general, especially on the left, don't really like constitutions. And, he did some things to erode the constitution as quickly as he could. In 2002, a counter revolution set up against him and it was middle class basically. Middle class pushing back as well as poor, pushing back parts of the military sided with them, they took the presidential palace and Hugo Chavez was held for 47 hours by what was in effect a junta. Now incidentally, the CIA was not behind this.
I have this on good authority. In fact, the US got wind of it about a week before and the ambassador went and warned Hugo Chavez that they had wind of perhaps some coup being plotted, but they were uncertain. The the chief of station of the CIA at the time was a female. And I'm on good authority that when the coup went off, she was actually spend her time running around the embassy trying to document. She had nothing to do with it.
The CIA had nothing to do with it. It really was these this popular uprising and some generals who didn't like that they had this, that they had this generalismo was just, you know, was trying to was becoming too authoritarian and disrespecting the constitution. Now, they held him for 47 hours and negotiated instead of killing him. There's an old saying, when you go to kill the king, you gotta kill the king. They didn't kill the king or the Generalissimo.
They actually reached a deal. The Catholic Church and in particular, a certain archbishop or cardinal or something, Venezuelan archbishop in the Catholic church, maybe it was the Papalansi, I don't know, he was a poohbah of the Catholic church, got a a mass uprising against the people who had, who had taken power. And a deal was negotiated with Hugo Chavez to release them and return things to status quo ante and we're all gonna go on together and go forward and he was supposed to have learned his lesson. In fact, there was a TV appearance where he met on the TV with the coup plotters and they all hugged it out they all hugged it out. That didn't work out and he he was released.
Oddly enough, that didn't work out too well for the coup plotters. Jeez, you can't trust this South American gentleman who can you trust. They all were very shortly thereafter picked up, he, thrown into prison, tortured mercilessly for years to death, in prison. A couple of them escaped. I think last I heard they were driving Ubers in Houston that there's something now.
So in 2004, there was I'm sorry. Hugo was back in power from 2,002 on. It was just out for 2 days. But in by 2,004, there was great discontent. In fact, there was a there a clause in the Venezuelan constitution that I think he may have put in there that said if 20% of the electorate ever signs a petition, they can recall the president in the middle of his term.
And they in 2003, that happened. 20% of the voting age Venezuelans had signed a referendum recalling him. So there was if 20% would sign it, there was real and his support by 2,003, 2004 was down to 35%, 65 against him, 35, really 70, 30, 30 to 35% of people supporting him. And he faced this referendum. Does Venezuela in 2004, does Venezuela recall Hugo Chavez from the pull him out of the presidency?
And in August, they had they held the referendum. And even though his support his support in polls only showed at 30 or 35%. He actually got 58% once the referendum was held. So, put a pin in that. We'll be coming back to that.
So at that point, Hugo wasn't gonna mess around with any of this Tom Fuller anymore. He cements his hold on power turning to his great mentor Fidel Castro for tips. Now, Fidel Castro was a if you don't know who Fidel Castro, all Americans should know Fidel. And if you don't one of Cuban immigrants around, you can ask about how Fidel Castro is remain remained in power, and his brother after his death and so forth and how the Cuban regime has remained in power. If Hugo Chavez was, as I recall, he was a bastard, That certainly in a sense of he was a real bastard.
He was a real tough, you know, being kind of guy. But I think he was an illegitimate son or he was the son of the maybe the son of the housekeeper. I don't know. But son of the maids, he was rejected by his father. So he had what shrinks would call this great narcissistic wound.
And Fidel filled that playing the role of the father figure to Hugo Chavez and really was his mentor and taught him how to stay in power after that. So there was no monkeying about with, with referendums and couche and so forth. And such that and he tightened his grip such that by 2012, the year before his death, even the human rights watch, which is thought of his rather left, human rights organization was writing, talking about the concentration and abuse of power in Chavez's Venezuela. And he died the next year. Let's switch subjects now.
We turn now to the subject of the Venezuelan mafia. It is called Cartel de la Soles or Cartel of the Suns. Suns as in it's a bright sunny day. Here's why it's called that. In most nations, a general in the military has stars on his shoulders.
For example, a 3 star general, which is a friend of mine. But in Venezuela, the generals have sons on their shoulders. So, for example, the chief of staff of the military, Vladimir Padrino Lopez, is a 5 son general. And in Venezuela, they refer to the mafia as the cartel de la soles because the capos of the mafia of Venezuela are in fact the generals of the army, of the military. And which is to say that the mafia is the government of Venezuela.
Ma Venezuela is where mafia cartel turns into nation state as a matter of fact. So this cartel of the sons, cartel of the soldiers, that's this reference to our generals or the heads of the mafia, has been mapped out carefully by the Department of Justice. You can find org charts of the mafia of Venezuela. And it's mostly members of the military, but also other important politicians, the head of the National Assembly, and certain other figures within Venezuela. They are the mafia of they are the government and they're the mafia of Venezuela.
It's it's both the mafia and they is is the government and vice versa. You can actually click around and explore online the org structure of the mafia of Venezuela. Thanks to the US DOJ. I'd like to draw your attention to just a couple names there. One of them is Tariq Alissimi, who was the vice president since 2017.
He's a Lebanese Shia. And by that, meaning Hezbollah, meaning Iran. So that's one important thing to know that has that Iran Hezbollah has been integrated into the government of Venezuela. That's one thing going on. The other thing the other name I wanna draw to your attention is Diasdato Cabello who was a close friend of Hugo Chavez and while he was alive and still an important figure there and the head of the National Assembly now.
Something to know about this mafia and these generals and I feel I don't wanna be accused of being a bigot to say this, but it would be remiss of me not to mention this. A whole bunch of these folks are gay. Now, it's a type of gay that I don't think we have in the US where it's super macho gay, so macho that they look at men who shag women as as like a weakling. It's a poof only poofter would shag you know, real tough guys, they shag men. So a whole bunch of these fellows are gay.
Now they have wives and families and for social appearances, but they, they're actually gay. And yet Hugo Chavez would regularly come over to their homes, of the homes of his own generals in the evenings and rape their wives in front of them. And it was not a it was a power thing, an alpha wolf thing. I mean, alpha woman keeping his his troops in line. And although they were gay, I can't imagine they liked that too much.
So this is a rough crowd. This is a rough crowd. There's one fellow who went to the he he went to the fact and said, I'm gonna I'll release secrets of the Venezuelan regime if you come after me. They grabbed his brother. They snatched him and they carved him up.
They cut him into pieces alive, videotaped it all and send it to the guy's mother as a warning to keep your mouth shut. So that's the kind of people we're talking about here. Now, this is I just wanna mention that the American left at one point embraced all these people like, I think a whole bunch of them were brought to do so. I've been told, but one I don't think was brought to do to do so was Noam Chomsky who has a long history of embracing lefty tyrants. If you go back to the late seventies, wrote a couple of books basically apologizing for the Khmer Rouge who was saying, well, we probably shouldn't believe these stories we're hearing about them.
It's probably all propaganda. And in the early days of early years of this regime, he was down there and, you know, they they love Noam Chomsky. I guess, I understand of late or later he sort of well, I didn't know that they were gonna be so authoritarian. That's because he's doesn't understand the point I made earlier about constitutions. You know, these social justice guys come in with great strong ambitions of how they're gonna change the world and and redraw the world unbounded, the present unbounded by the past or something.
And by and so they don't like constitutions. But once and that's why they break up constitutions and dissolve them and reinterpret them until they're meaningless. And any student of history knows that, of course, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Right? And, that's just something so it's kinda silly for Chomsky to keep on embracing left the social justice people who turn become tyrants and then say afterwards, well, I didn't know they were gonna be tyrants.
Yeah, you did. When they that's why they get rid of constitutions. So this is a tough crowd. Is it and kind of my favorite among this rogues gallery is Jorge Rodriguez. I think of him as Venezuela's doctor evil.
Do you remember Austin Powers' doctor evil? $3,000,000. Well, Jorge Rodriguez, is a psychiatrist in the mold of Hannibal Lecter. His sister incidentally is the Delce Rodriguez is the vice president. He's really, as I understand it, the great mind, the the great grand master chess player in the regime who has plotted and thought of really, it's it's his genius that is behind the story I'm telling you.
Jorge Rodriguez, I hope we get a chance to meet in some circumstance sometime where we're not gonna kill each other, alright, because Beasmere just wants to really understand this a lot better. It's it's, I'll be showing you a clip of him short later in the in the presentation. So 2 things you, need to know about the Venezuelan mafia. They seized 2 power bases. The 2 most important things to own in Venezuela.
1 is they seize control of PDVSA, which is PDVSA stands for Petroleos de the Venezuela SA or the Venezuelan Oil Company. Venezuela is the largest oil reserves in the world. It's bigger than Saudi Arabia. But unlike the Gulf, and I happen to be in the Gulf as I speak, the Gulf of Arabia or the Persian Gulf depending on which side you're on, the here, there's a there's fortunes and there's a lot of rich leaders and stuff, but they actually seem to have some sense of that they wanna build their country and make things better for their people. In Venezuela, the mafia just sees its oil reserves as something to loot.
They just loot. And by all accounts, they looted somewhere between $2,000,000,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000,000 from Venezuela. While, when I was there in 2018, there was starvation, there was cannibalism, but the regime, the mafia, but the regime has looted 2 to $4,000,000,000,000 depending on who you talk to. Now, pet if so, that's one important thing they seized. The other important thing they needed to seize was if you've got this great gig where you've got the world's biggest, you know, gas station under under your feet and you're able to just loot it for trillions, the other thing you need to take control of is, besides the oil company, is CNE, which stands for the Consejo Nacional Electoral, the National Electoral Council.
That is that's how you make sure that you're not voted out of office, that you get this in perpetually, that you that you this gas station that you're looting called Venezuela, you get to own it and you never get kicked out. So now let's move on to another branch of our story, Smartmatic. Now Smartmatic was founded by these 3 general gentlemen, Roger Penate, Antonio Mojica, and Alfredo Anzola. It was founded in April, they moved to Coral Gables, Florida in 2000 and they filed at Delaware. They're Venezuelan engineers.
They had a small software company in Venezuela from 97 just made like a home automation software, something benign. But in 2000, they moved to Coral Gables, Florida. They file a Delaware corporation called Smartmatic. Now later, they were to say that this was done in response to hanging Chad's thing. Well, no, because that that this was done in April of 2000.
They, and this fellow Alfredo, Anzola, he not after not so many years, I should mention, he got he had an affair with one of the wives of one of the people, one of the mafiosis. I forget who. It may have been Diisato Cabello. I forget if he's one of the gay ones or not, but it wasn't a smart thing to do for him and he got erased. So really and Roger Penate, there's recently just a few months ago, the DOJ, United States DOJ brought an indictment against Smartmatic including Roger Penate.
So he's sort of out of the picture. But Antonio Mujica is still alive and well and on the streets of London. So let's go back to they were they were sent in 2000 to Boca Raton. They found Smartmatic and as a Delaware corporation. By the way, the American Journal is saying, well, we looked at this.
This is a Delaware corporation. It has nothing to do with Venezuela. Yes. 3 Venezuelan immigrants who with cartel backing who came to Florida and started a company and filed the incorporation documents in Delaware. That's how deep or superficial American journals are.
They can't see past well, the incorporated is a Delaware company, that's not Venezuela. Okay. They were tasked with this issue. How do we come up with a let's come up with a computerized election system that for Hugo Chavez is that he can rig and stay in power. So he never has any of these problems again.
In 2003, they found their solution, Olivetti. Now, old an Italian company. Now, old timers may remember this device called a typewriter. By 2,000 and Olivetti was when I was a kid, it was one of the big names, not the biggest name in typewriters. But by 2003, typewriters didn't have much of a future and Olivetti had moved into a new game, a new business and that was they were manufacturing lottery terminals.
See the, the brand, this is an old Olivetti lottery terminal. Now, in a lot of nations, how lotteries work is kiosks. And a kiosk is like a 711, a small store, that's what it's called in most parts of the world, a small store that sells tobacco and milk and things like that, chewing gum and newspapers and lottery tickets. And in a lot of the nations, there there are machines that these terminals that sell the lottery tickets and machines are all wired together to 1 national computer that the lottery has held on. Now, I don't want to cast and the the the Smartmatic guys figured out that you could take that architecture and it mapped on perfectly to running a national election instead of having 5,000 kiosks with lottery terminals and then wired into a central lottery, computer, national lottery computer, you have 5,000 or whatever voting precincts each with a computer and they're all wired to get with a terminal and they're all wired together into the national election computer.
And and so the the architecture of the one system mapped on and was perfect for creating what they wanted to create a national computerized election system. Now, at the risk of casting any aspersions on our good Italian friends which I don't want to do, love the Italians. But I have to point something out. And I'm going to do that by telling you Ronald Reagan's favorite joke. And he would get in trouble if you told this today, but Ronald Reagan told this at a, like, a Friendly Sons of Italy luncheon 40 years ago.
The joke concerns a cockfight, which is that thing where guys bring roosters with razor blades while, you know, on their feet and they fight as cockfight. It's a 3 part joke. So pardon, you wouldn't tell this joke today, but I'm just reporting what Reagan told 40 years ago. How do you tell there's a Polish person at a cock fight? Because somebody enters a duck.
How do you tell there's an Irishman at the cockfight? Because somebody bets on the duck. But how do you tell that there's an I how do you know that there's an Italian at the cockfight? The duck wins. The duck wins.
That joke's funny because well, let's just say it may be possible that an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals, an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals might be tempted to put a backdoor in the system so that the president of the country of where whatever it was sold could hold a lottery and could make sure it was rigged so that, you know, his brother in law's neighbor won the lottery and then there's kickbacks. May just be the case that an Italian manufacturer of lottery terminals, one might suspect that. I don't know. Which means if you take that system and you take it back to Venezuela and you build a net turn it into a national election system where the terminals are in every voting precinct and tied to a national election computer, you might be able to rig it. Maybe that has something to do with why Hugo Chavez in that referendum of 2004, though he only showed himself having 30 to 35% in the polls, actually won 58% of the vote.
That might be possible. Okay. Why should you care about any of this? Because what happened subsequently is the cartel, the mafia, Hugo Chavez figured out this was a real edge. And Smartmatic next bought an American election machinery company called Sequoia, the old mechanical like, I first voted on as a kid and which was just getting into computerized systems in 20 years ago.
They bought them. In addition, the company Diebold whom you know today, they make ATMs. They've made ATMs all my life. Anywhere you see ATMs, you always see Diebold. But back 20 years ago, they also own a division that made election machines, voting machines.
Here's a report of Fortune Magazine story from the time. And they had their voting machines. They were in they were forced by the Department of Justice under Eric Holder to divest their voting machine division. And Smartmatic bought Sequoia and they injected their intellectual property in it with the licensing agreement. They gave licenses to all their all their election rigging stuff.
And between the Sequoia and the Diebold voting, hardware, the software and the hardware, the following happened. Now, you know, when you go buying a laptop, if it's not in Macintosh, if you're buying a PC, be be it HP or Dell or Lenovo, when you buy one of those, they have those brand names on the outside, but inside, the operating system is all Microsoft Windows. Right? Say, Microsoft Windows, whichever one of these brands of laptop you buy is Microsoft Windows. Similarly, the 3 main brands of election equipment in the market today are Dominion, Heart IntraCivic and ES and S.
Whichever one of those you buy, on the inside, you are getting this marriage of of Sequoia, of Smartmatic intellectual property via Sequoia and the Dominion, I'm sorry, the Diebold hardware which all got married together and it's, it's actually in these different machines. As a matter of fact, there's a and now, they've been renamed the old Smartmatic Election Management System. God changed his name somewhere along the line to General Election Management System. Dominion has something called they call their software Democracy Suite 5.5. It's all Smartmatic.
It's all Smartmatic. Dominion took Smartmatic which was written in c plus plus and they just wrote c sharp, the language called c sharp. They wrote it, rewrote it as in c plus plus, but it's the same module by module, line by line. It's the same software. And why that's important is remember, that was a spun out of the CNE, the Consejo Nacional Electoral, the National Election Commission in Venezuela, which is under the thumb of Hugo Chavez and his mentor, Fidel, the Venezuelan mafia, and the the grand master of this strategy, doctor Jorge Rodriguez.
Saying that differently in this order, that is to say that Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, dictators, and the Venezuelan mafia and Hannibal Lecter, doctor evil of Venezuela, doctor Jorge Rodriguez, besides capturing the National Oil Company of Venezuela, captured the National Election Council of Venezuela which created a commercial go to market vehicle called SmartMatic, which through a series of corporate acquisitions and licensing agreements and divestments of of hardware of a different company, got all married together and that became the guts of these of the 3 major election systems used today in not just in the USA, but in the world. As a matter of fact, Smartmatic has a factory in Taiwan and that factory has this one production line and at the end of the line, the boxes come off and they get the label screwed on. Are they Dominion? Are they Hart? Are they ES and S?
But it's from one factory in Taiwan and just these different brand names. And but with all this Venezuelan junk software in it integrated into this hardware. And why that should be especially concerning is that production line isn't really manufacturing those computers. It's just assembling them out of components and the components come from the most important components come from a factory 60 miles outside of Beijing in mainland communist China. And that means they're under the those components are brought into are brought into the system or brought into the factory in Taiwan in Taiwan and which just assembles them.
And that is means it's all under the thumb of Xi Jinping, emperor for life of China. And why the US government doesn't know this besides being indolent or corrupt or indolent and corrupt is these companies have been lying about their supply chain. Smartmatic has been lying about its supply chain. And how they get away with it is Iran, the Mullahs of Iran play a role and they act as paymasters. So wherever so they keep certain payments that would reveal this.
They keep out of the banking system and out of the swift system so you can't see it. And it's done through a transfer pricing mechanism run through Iranian oil. So if one guy needs to make a $10,000,000 payment to another agent in the supply chain instead of one wiring the other money which could all be seen in the international banking system, Transfer pricing payment systems is like Iran sells 1 party a shipload of oil at $10,000,000 less than they should charge and they sell somebody else down the supply chain, I ship load of oil at $10,000,000 more than they would normally charge and that effectively is a $10,000,000 transfer. It it creates a it's effectively a $10,000,000 transfer of wealth between the 2 but there's no record of it in any banking system. It just shifts that money.
So that's how the payments are managed in the supply chain and it's kept out of the eyes of the United States government. This all sounds a little hard to believe. Let me show you something doctor Jorge Rodriguez said just couple months ago in on July 28th this year, Venezuela had an election and it went kind of oddly because the polls showed them down 80 to 20. The regime only had 20% support and they just ended up sort of canceling their normal way of of lending the public see the election results as they developed and they just came out and canceled all and said, we won 51 to 49. And all bunch of nations including 16 American organization, OAS Nations, Organization of American States challenged this election.
The Carter Center said, FUI, Europeans, all kinds of people have said this is a fake collection. Jorge Rodriguez went on television, and said as follows. So what is he saying there? He's saying I think he's intimating that if any of your countries push us and Venezuelans too hard about this, we're gonna start talking about the elections of the United States and European countries and these different, South American countries. I think what he's suggesting is he rigged them all.
He rigged them all and if you folks talk to if you push us too hard on us, we're, we got a lot we're gonna open our mouths. As a matter of fact, the in the the Organization of American States needed 18 countries to vote, to take action, to vote against this, not to recognize their election. 16 did vote against them. 3 or 4 abstained. And what do you know?
It's just the countries, the South American countries he just named. They abstained from the vote. They sat back. So I think that was a not so veiled threat from Jorge. Do you see why I say I kinda I'm kind of intrigued by this this guy?
Okay. So here's the punch line. Here's the summary and punch line. Over the last 20 years, the Venezuelan mafia with the assistance, direction, and funds from China and Iran, has been rigging elections at various levels from mayors and prosecutors to governors and congressmen and senators and presidents, judges in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. This is so Chinese.
The ultimate victory is to win a victory without firing a shot. They've changed the China and the Venezuelan communist dictators have changed the arc of history across 72 nations over 20 years through this technology, and we just see the world changing out from under our feet and don't understand why. That's why. So what you have learned is the backstory on Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the 98 to 2001 Bolivarian Revolution, the 2002 counterrevolution and counter counterrevolution, the failed recall of Hugo Chavez in 2004 has turning Venezuela into pure dictatorship, the emergence of a super cartel mafia that has become the Venezuelan government, the 2 best businesses to be in in Venezuela, oil and elections and why, and who were the people behind the people behind this adventure. PS, messages to the DOJ and to real Americans.
To the DOJ, first, let's save time. I take responsibilities for any felonies or active wars that may have been committed. This entire project is on me. I've got a letter. Will 12 American will 12 Americans in a jury box think that I'm covered by this letter?
And if you wanna know what I mean, well, I I get, if you want to know what I mean, look my of my recent book Danger Close which explains what I mean by I get a letter. I gotta have security though to come I'll come back anytime, and face face the rap for this. I gotta have security. Why? Venezuela has put a $25,000,000 bounty on my head.
Can't imagine why. And I was keeping this to myself, but I'm in a little legal squabble with Hunter Biden and I had to reveal this. Hunter Biden didn't show up for depositions. He insisted doing it by Zoom. So I said the same thing, wanna do it by Zoom and they didn't wanna let me do it.
And so I had to file something under seal with the court that explained that I've had 2 governments now warned me that Venezuela has a $25,000,000 bounty on my head. There's mafis all over the world looking for me. And Hunter Biden deliberately took that and his lawyer took it and filed something not under seal they quoted from it. And then so so it was filed, not under seal and then the press got it and it's been written about in Newsweek several weeks ago. So every bad guy in the world knows that there's $25,000,000 bounty on my head.
So if you want me to come back DOJ and face the wrath for any of this, I'll be happy to. There's I get I get security. I look forward to it. But may I respectfully suggest that maybe you should reflect on whether you folks have letters. I'm the only guy on my side of the table who knows what the expression truth and reconciliation means and wants a peaceful outcome to this.
I I really am. I don't so maybe you should folks should think about your your letters. Okay. Messages to real Americans, help a brother out. Share this video everywhere.
We got 2 weeks to make a difference. And go to americaproject.com and sign up for $5 a month. Americaproject.com. Unraveling all of this and getting to the bottom of it has cost tens of 1,000,000 of dollars. I'd like your help.
It's not too much to ask. Go to americaproject.com and sign on for $5 per month. I hope you have enjoyed this tale of the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America or Fidel and Hugo's excellent Bolivarian adventure. Thank you.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Bonus bonus: the documentation to support the store I’ve told above can all be located on this wonderful site, https://stolenelectionsfacts.com/
StolenElectionsFacts
stolenelectionsfacts.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1848991044009890156?refresh=1729693283
Thread by @PatrickByrne on Thread Reader App
@PatrickByrne: HOW CUBA & VENEZUELA CONQUERED THE USA A 6-post thread (each post = 7 minute video). A semester's class yet brisk & easy-to-follow. Retweet as if your family's & nation's life rely on it. (Last...…
threadreaderapp.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been discussing the recent developments in our FOIA case regarding USPS's alleged corruption during the 2020 election. A new complaint was filed in Maryland, presenting evidence that USPS illegally transported over a million mail-in ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. This was based on testimony from truck driver Jesse Morgan and corroborated by my colleagues John Moynihan and Larry Doyle. The complaint highlights ongoing issues with mail-in ballot delivery, including lost and improperly post-marked ballots, aiming to prevent USPS interference in future elections.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Royal Flush: a brisk walk-through of USPS corruption of election 2020, our FOIA case regarding it, and our emergency injunction against USPS this week. Our original FOIA case seeking USPS 2020 records: https://courtlistener.com/docket/63178307/della-rocca-v-united-states-postal-service/ A good synopsis can be found in the attached post.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, a whistleblower, Jesse Morgan, reported irregularities with ballots. A Michigan company printed extra ballots beyond their contracts, shipping them to Flushing, NY, where they were filled out, then sent to Bethpage, NY, and reintegrated into the mail system. One of Morgan's trucks held a minimum of a million ballots. Eight other trucks were also involved, potentially totaling 12-13 million ballots.
The postal service fought revealing who paid for the trucks. They altered their document retention policy in 2020, shortening the look-back period to 90 days, destroying election-related documents, then reverting to a 6-year policy. This change was approved by Judge Emmett Sullivan.
A case was filed against the postal service for obstructing FOIA requests and potentially violating the Constitution by involvement in elections. An emergency injunction was sought in Maryland to prevent postal service involvement in the upcoming election or, at minimum, demand radical transparency regarding ballot movement. A hearing is scheduled. The goal is to expose potential fraud and ensure election integrity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team Freedom. Patrick here. It's about time I come clean about the postal service, lawsuits we have. There's now 2 of them, and I may as well just review this briskly. In 2020, you may remember a whistleblower came forward named Jesse Morgan.
It was a trucker who said that he had been given a strange trucking load, and he looked into it and he found some funny things. I'm gonna walk you through what what really happened there. What really happened there is this. When I built Overstock, we had an issue where sometimes you would buy what you try not to, but you would get great goods. And this is how that work.
And believe me, this will transport directly over and translate directly into discussing, ballots. Somebody would go North Face would go to Taiwan and have some factory make 10,000 sleeping bags for them. North Face, you know, under license in North Face, so forth. That factory would stay open an extra weekend and run another 2,000 sleeping bags. And then they would go into the market and sell them as North Face sleeping bags.
Now and you you were at a great price and as a discount as, you know, we would buy them. Well, it turns out and but it would turn out that they weren't well, they were forensically, they were North Face. It was the same factory, the same paperwork, the same labels, the same employees had done it. They were not actually produced under license to North Face, and so that was called gray goods. And keeping that stuff out of our supply chain was a full time job for 1 Water.
Was always looking at paperwork. Well, in the creation of ballots, the same thing happened in 2020. There was a ballot company in Michigan who won a bunch of contracts to to print ballots for this county and that county all over America, about 20 different states. What they were doing, was they were if they got a contract to print 200,000 ballots for 1 county, they would print up 300,000 and take those extra 100,000, and they would ship them off to Europe, to to, Europe, to New York, to a place called Flushing, New York, which has has a long history with a radical left. There was a facility there, a 100 people in a room associated with a union called SEIU, filling those ballots out.
And the same thing was going on with all the counties that this that this printing company in Michigan supplied. So these people would fill them out a very well organized effort. We'd be filling them out, and then they were sent to Bethpage, New York. And at Bethpage, New York, there was a facility, on Grumman Road, I believe it was called, where these were taken and they were re they they were reintegrated into the mail. They were integrated into the mail system as possible.
Now the Bethpage, New York facility is a postal, station, but it's not set up to handle 1st class mail and ballots of 1st class mail. And if you're gonna handle 1st class mail, you need something called an Oregon machine. But they don't have an Oregon machine. But they were handling 1st class mail, and they were putting them in gaylords. What is a gaylord?
A gaylord there's a picture of a gaylord on the front of this, associated with this video. A gaylord is a a box or a big canvas shopping version of a shopping cart, but much bigger. And it's on wheels, 4 wheels. And anytime you do warehouse work where you're moving lots of letters or packages, they get put in things called gaylords, and then you move these boxes on wheels. Is it worth to think of them as very big shopping carts made sometimes made out of with canvas walls on wheels, and that's what you move around the warehouse.
So each gaylord holds 50 to a 100000 ballots. Between October 18th October 21, 2020, 8 get, trucks came in from a company called area trucking area road and trucking, and they were filled up with gaylords, 20 to 30 gaylords, and sent on their way to Lancaster, PA. One day, a on one of those 3 days in late in mid late October 2020, a trucking company, a different trucking company, it's truck pulled in. It was called 10 road 10 roads trucking. 10 roads trucking.
And and, driven by a guy named Jesse Morgan. And somebody at the facility made a mistake, and they loaded those ballots onto the wrong onto his truck, wrong company's truck. He got the paperwork and he said, truck this to Lancaster, PA. He trucked it to Lancaster, PA. That, that was the guy.
His name was Jesse Morgan. That he got to Lancaster, PA. He was kept waiting for 6 hours because the paperwork wasn't from the right company and whatever who he went in the back of his truck and he found 20 gaylords. May have been 20 as much as 27 gaylords. Well, if each one holds if there were only 20 and each one held only 50,000, the truth is they can hold up to a 100,000 ballots.
That well, 20 gaylords and 50,000 ballots. That's a 1000000 ballots. And by the way, these ballots, the envelope, they were filled in and the outside envelopes were signed. And that's because in this facility in Flushing, New York, there were a 100 union folks sitting there at tables filling out ballots for Joe Biden and signing the outside in the envelope. Of course, so that's that was the the supply chain that got them from a a printing company was that was deliberately printing up great goods, extra ballots, getting them to this left wing group in Flushing, New York who was filling them out and signing them to a for a postal facility in Bethpage, New York that wasn't supposed to be handling first class, mail, but yet it was handling ballots, which were first class mail, loading them into a truck, getting them to Lancaster, PA.
And there, they were entering the mail system as mail in ballots. Well, that just that one Jesse Morgan truck had at least a 1000000 ballots in it. It may have had a 1000000 and a half ballots. And then he went back and he he looked at it, and that's what he found when he went back in. There were there were 20 to 27 gay boards each with 50 to a 100000 ballots.
We could determine later by weight. And they, so a minimum of a million, probably more like a1000000 and a half ballots. And remember, that was one of 9 trucks. We know there were 8 other trucks from some other company. So 8 or 9 times a1000000 is 8 to 9000000, but it may have been 9 times a 1000000 and a half or more.
So maybe more like 12, 13,000,000 ballots or re mailing ballots were integrated into the mail system through this this chain that I just described. And that's just in the north. We think there was something similar going on in the south and this involving a company called Runback. Different story. But that's what happened in 2020.
And that's the that's this whistleblower who came forward. Now that whistleblower came forward and he told this story. He was immediately picked up by the feds, held in some, you know, basement for 9 hours, questioned. And the feds came out with a piece of paper saying he just signed something that retracted the statement he he gave him. He immediately came out and said, look, I was in the underground with these feds, and they berated me for 9 hours to get me to retract my story.
At a recent point, they said they were gonna kill me and my family or something. And at that point to get out of it, I said I withdraw, but and I signed something that says I'd take this back. That was so I didn't get killed in this basement. I came out and I'm telling you folks the truth. That absolutely was the truth, what I had to say.
We investigated that and we had the wonderful John Bornahan, part of the America project, as a 25 year federal officer from the DEA, but now he's in a private kind of a specialty practice. And he does odd investigations. We have affidavits from people who were involved, people who worked in the in the Bethpage facility. We have the whole chain of command mapped out. But the last thing we needed was, okay, tell us who paid for those trucks.
Now it gets interesting. So now I'm giving you a history. If you've been following my videos over the years, you will have heard a lot of this, maybe not all of it. I've never really deliberately never really put it all together for everybody because I've given you this history and then giving you a new development in the last month that's big. So for 4 years, we fought with the postal service to say, okay.
Who paid for that truck? Somebody paid for those trucks. And, you know, we think it was the DNC or it's gonna be turned out to be Kleiner Perkins and some DNC front company paid for all this. They have fought turning that over like it's the nuclear codes to turn over that information. In the process of the postal service turning fighting to turn that over, some really funny things came out.
One of them is that federal agencies so federal postal service takes a picture of every first class mail that comes through. There's a digital picture. There's huge server farms the postal service maintains where everything's really recorded. All the movement of every piece of paper. If we're correct, there's 10 to 12, 13,000,000 ballots out there, which there will be no digital photos for of how they of how they got it.
If they really got into the system naturally, people just turning them in, there would be they would've there'd be a digital photo trail along the way of all of those ballots. There is none because they didn't they're not legitimate. They they were created like I just described, taken to a not to a postal facility not legally able to handle 1st class mail and reintegrated into the mail system as I just described. They they would provide no information on the background of those 12,000,000 ballots and in including who paid for the trucking. Because if it turns out it was the DNC or Kleiner Perkins who paid for those trucks, then that kinda answers everything.
Well, the the branches of the parts of the executive branch, they all have what you're talking about the IRS, you're talking about the EPA. They all have a documents retention policy just like any company does. And then publicly traded company has to maintain all documents for 6:6 years. So if a if a lawsuit comes in or the SEC comes in, you can sort of recreate everything that's happened in every part of the company for 6 years. And that's what the federal government has.
In 2020, in March or April of 2020, 9 months before the election, the postal service changed their document retention policy. How long they keep documents From a 6 year look back to a 90 day look back. K? 90 days, maybe even 30 days on some types of things. They got through and they now they got through the election, got 30 to 90 days out destroyed, claimed to have destroyed all their documents related to the election.
And then they changed their look back policy to 6 years again. They changed it from 6 years to 90 days, got into during 2020, got through the election, got everything destroyed, and then changed it back to 6 years. Well, there's something called the Administrative Procedures Act. I think it's 1971, which says when a federal agency changes some administrative procedure, how it works is it publishes to the public, we're considering changing some rule. And the public has 60 days to study it and 30 days to write their their feelings about that and what they want.
And then the agency has, you know, it's this very formal process. It has 30 days where they come back and they propose a new rule and then the public has another comment period. And then finally, the agency publishes its rule. They didn't do any of that as they change these procedures. The only way they can get around doing those things is the administrative procedures act does allow for a a regulator or administrative part of the government to change its procedures without going through that rigmarole if they get the sign off of a federal judge.
And the postal service has, in fact, in 2020, gotten the sign off of a federal judge. That federal judge is Emmett Sullivan. And if you've been paying attention, Emmett Sullivan is the very strange judge who oversaw the Mike Flynn fiasco for the DOJ where they hounded Mike Flynn, a decorated 3 star general. They hounded him for 3 4 4 years, 5 years, saying, they they hounded him. He, at at one point, the media was actually say, well, he plead guilty.
He did submit a guilty plea for when they for a nothing burger offense when they threatened his son with 25 years. But he got into it and he withdrew the guilty plea. The media will never tell you that. He withdrew withdrew the guilty plea, fought it on. Eventually, the DOJ got a retired judge to come in and look at the whole case.
They said this whole case is trumped up. It should never been brought. But this guy, Emmett Sullivan, he'd never accepted the guilty plea, which is why when people say, Flynn is a convicted felon. He's not a convicted felon. He submitted a guilty plea to a felony.
The judge didn't accept it. The judge savored it like a fine wine and danced around for months. So the media could say, we have a guilty plea from from Michael Flynn. Well, because he took so long, that gave Michael Flynn time as he learned more and in particular learned how crooked the case was that had been fabricated against him. He withdrew the guilty plea.
So they that judge never accepted the guilty plea, which means Mike Flynn is not. Like, he was never convicted. He may never accepted the plea. They fought it on and a retired judge from Saint Louis or somebody came in and looked at it all and said this whole thing is a big lark and the DOJ and they should never been brought and the DOJ dropped the case. That's the judge, Emmett Sullivan, who refused to let it drop and said, well, I'm gonna prosecute Michael Flynn.
Well, that's not how prosecutions work. The judge is a the neutral judge and the government brings a case and there's the defendant. A judge in American history has never said I'm gonna run my own prosecution of this guy. It was ridiculous. And that went on until Trump pardoned this kangaroo pardon him out of this kangaroo court situation.
That's and it's Sullivan. That's the same judge who signed off in 2020 on this Mickey Mouse behavior from the postal service that let them destroy their records. I've just summarized a 4 year multimillion dollar fight, multimillion dollar fight, 2, $3,000,000 fight. You know, people wonder what the what the American project does. It funds so many things like this.
It fund so many things like this. That but that's and and now I'll be putting it online either I'll be putting it online probably on Telegram is where I put a bunch of documents. I'll attach what I can to this local's broadcast. The they finally in, like, September put well, actually, finding that out, I'll tell you this with the postal service. It was so clear they were in the wrong that eventually, the they got a lawyer not from the chief legal counsel of the US Postal Service.
All we had was a FOIA case, a Freedom of Information Act case in Washington DC set telling us saying, who paid for those trucks? You know, somebody pays for them. 10 roads, trucking area, trucking didn't didn't just do that on their own. Somebody paid for those trucks. Finally, judges, I mean, Obama appointees and and democratic judges who were involved in the process were telling the postal service you have to turn that information over.
But somewhere in there, the postal service finally turned over, and they kept saying we don't have the information. We don't have the information. We were able to prove they did. They had it. There were different ways it was buried.
They finally turned over a sheet about the billings from that facility on on those three dates in October of 2020. It was, like, 9th 18th 19th 20th, I think. And they had whited out those 3 dates. They and and then they ended up saying, we will we will not turn over not even with a judicial order, we will not turn over information for those 3 dates. So and in a normal world, that would be proof of guilt, you know, long ago proof of guilt.
Their own DOJ attorneys let us know and let in filings, they were ordering their their people, their client, in this case, the US Postal Service, to turn the information over and the client just wouldn't return wouldn't turn it over. Finally, we got an affidavit filed in September of this year from some guy who oversees the and I'll I'll include as much of this as I can in the, in the notes that you can look at these things yourself. An affidavit saying we don't have the data. Well, at this point, there's a judge, Daphne Daphne Friedman in Washington DC who's had enough, and she clearly doesn't believe. And there is nothing I mean, there's nothing to believe.
They've just stonewalled us and the judicial system for 4 years turning over simple information, which makes us really confident what that information is, is something like who paid for that trucking that was is gonna turn out to be Kleiner Perkins or some other democratic front paid for that. And and, so, boom, that is background. We filed a case in late August, again, in May in, Maryland with a federal judge in Maryland against the postal service saying, look, they clearly cheated. They cheated on all these FOIA responses. They've been hiding this information.
They're lying. They're clearly lying because we've, time and again, we've proven that they have information that they claim they didn't have. And so we finally went to the postal service 2 months ago and said I mean, we went to the judiciary 2 months ago and said the postal service cannot be involved in an election. Given what they did in 2020 and given how they've stonewalled and buried and refused to answer these questions, they're clear. And there's so many, so much evidence, including the affidavits we have from people in that chain of command.
They cannot be involved in the election in 2020. Incidentally, it's unconstitutional unconstitutional. You cannot have any part of the executive branch of the federal government involved in an election. That's like really clear law. And yet, so everything they've done and, of course, since Biden came to power, he created a special division of the postal service to be involved in elections.
That's unconstitutional. So we brought all this, including the postal services' crooked behavior over the preceding 4 years to a federal judge in Maryland and said and join them from being involved in this election. That judge has taken this very seriously. They tried to get it dismissed. It wasn't dismissed.
And now that Georgia's ordered judges ordered on Thursday or Friday, 2 days ago, we called for a an emergency injunction against the postal service, and the judge has granted it. So coming up, I believe, early this week, there is an there's a hearing on a federal judges injunction against telling the postal service they can't be involved in this election. Well, given how close we are to the election, it's highly unlikely the judge is going to go along with that remedy. But a lesser remedy is to say, okay. Then you have to demand radical transparency right now out of the postal service on all the movement of everything ballot related for this election.
Otherwise, we're going to just they're just gonna stuff like crazy the mail in ballots and present us with a fait accompli like they did in 2020. And no one will have any reason to judge to to trust these elections. So you just have to demand radical judge. You have to order immediately on an emergency injunction, radical transparency into the everything in the postal service involved with moving ballots. That's where things stand.
That was filed on Thursday or Friday. I believe it was granted. I believe this week, there is an emergency hearing in a Maryland court. By the way, the head of the Postal Service lives at the the postmaster general lives in Maryland, and that gives us reason to to have filed this in Maryland. And my understanding is we have a judge, not a friendly judge in Maryland, but a non crooked judge in Maryland.
And he's taking the postal services trying to get this kicked out or squashed, and the judge is having none of it. So there's a hearing coming up this week in a federal courtroom in Maryland where we're asking a judge at the very least. I mean, what you really should do is just say you cannot be involved in any election, which is incidentally what the con what the law and the constitution says. But if he's not gonna do something that extreme of remedy this late in the game, he certainly is, has the capacity to change things by demanding radical transparency immediately within the postal service for inspection, for any any movement of balance in this election. So I have given that as tersely and concisely as I can.
I will attach to my low I'll put this up in locals. I'll put up other places too, but I will attach to it links to, associated reading for further reading. Okay? So sorry we've been playing this this so close to the vest. I've spoken for a long time of a royal flush.
This has been the royal flush. And the ace was finding out I mean, we actually put together. We know where those fake ballots well, that's just a thing. They weren't fake ballots. They were ballots printed in a real printing company that was in on it is in on the fix up in Michigan.
And just like that, when I give you the North Face tent exam or sleeping bag example from Taiwan, those sleeping bags aren't fake. But in the sense, they're fake. They're just not you you see what I mean? They're fake. That mean they're manufactured out of license.
That what makes them very good. Well, our system is awash in very good balance. They don't have to be made in China. This stuff about them being printed in China, back in 2020, I don't know if any of that's true. Although we did see place where there were Chinese indications of Chinese printing, but the the main event is not that they're printed somewhere else.
They can be printed in the actual facility that's supposed to be printed in ballots, but they're just doing overruns and they're using those overruns to feed into the system this way. We have we know what happened in 2020. The only parts we don't know are the parts that they have broken the law by erasing, by shielding, by stonewalling for 4 years for 4 years. And shame on the federal judiciary. This has only happened because it's taken 4 years and they still, through their mechanism, could not get let us get to the bottom, to the true bottom of anything.
But given the behavior of the postal service, it's clear that they were involved in massive, you know, fraud on a 10 to 13,000,000 vote level back in 2020. I think they're stepping it up for this election. That so this is the hijacking of the country gets complete if it isn't stopped, and it has to be stopped right now. And we have all the information in if you for further reading. And it is now in front of a federal judge in Maryland seeking we're we're seeking at least a federal injunction against demanding radical transparency, if not eliminating the postal service from this game at all, which is really what the right the right solution is.
Okay? So further reading attached. I'll put up this video a few places. If you want the the the links for further reading, you have to find my locals account. Okay.
Patrick Byrne signing off.
DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 - CourtListener.com
Docket for DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
courtlistener.com
@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian
New Complaint Filed Alleging that US Postal Service (USPS) Committed Electoral Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit A new development that merits attention. A complaint was filed on Friday before the U.S. District Court in Maryland presenting evidence that the USPS acted illegally in shipping at least one million mail-in ballots from a facility in Bethpage, New York to Pennsylvania on October 21, 2020. The suit was brought by attorney Brian Della Rocca, but the critical evidence was collected by two friends of mine — John Moynihan and Larry Doyle. Full disclosure, I have known John since 1998 and we were partners in BERG Associates, LLC. John, in my opinion, is one of the best financial and forensic investigators in the world. Hands down. Here is the bottom-line — the truck driver, Jesse Morgan, picked up a container filled with 20 Gaylord boxes. There were mail-in ballots in each of the Gaylords. A Gaylord can hold from 50,000 up to 100,000 ballots. Do the math — Mr. Morgan was transporting at least one million mail-in ballots (already filled in with signatures on the envelopes). So, what you say? The mail-in ballots are First Class mail. Every piece of First Class mail is supposed to be imaged per USPS regulations. The facility where Morgan picked up the load of ballots is ONLY certified for handling packages and Express Mail. There is no legal justification to account for those ballots to have passed through that warehouse. Let me give you the highlights of the complaint and John’s affidavit. 4. As a result, allegations of problems with the delivery of mail-in ballots by the USPS were rampant and continue, to this day, to be challenged. As time passes, the allegations are not being disproven but, in fact, many of the allegations have turned out to be true. 5. These allegations include, but are not limited to, lost mail-in ballots (which were subsequently found after the elections), late delivery of mail-in ballots, improperly post-marked mail-in ballots that were still allowed to proceed to their destination despite postmarks being provided on valid mail-in ballots, and fraudulent mail-in ballots being sent via USPS. John’s affidavit gets to the heart of the matter: 3. On November 21, 2020, Doyle and I participated in a phone call with a contact (“NC”) who notified us of allegations that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) experienced certain “failures” involving mail-in ballots during the 2020 Presidential Election and wondered if we would assist with the investigation. 4. On November 24, 2020, Doyle and I met with NC and others in Arlington, VA to discuss the investigation and learn about the whistleblower, Jesse Richard Morgan, a truck driver employed by a contractor for the USPS who alleged he carried mail-in ballots among USPS facilities in Bethpage, NY, Harrisburg, PA, and Lancaster, PA (“Affiant Morgan”). 5. On November 25, 2020, Doyle and I began our investigation in earnest and identified a few companies of interest and, within those companies, employees who may have information. 6. As a result of Affiant Morgan, Doyle and I focused our investigation on the USPS facility on Grumman Road in Bethpage, NY (“Grumman Road Facility”). 7. On November 27, 2020, I enlisted the assistance of former colleagues from the DEA who are retired and live near the Grumman Road Facility. 8. On November 30, 2020, after learning the identities of several USPS employees within the Grumman Road Facility with whom Affiant Morgan had contact, Doyle and I conducted an interview with one such USPS employee (“CI-1”). 9. CI-1 stated the following facts: a. CI-1 is involved with loading trucks at the Grumman Road Facility – known as an expeditor. b. CI-1 told us that the Grumman Road Facility has never processed firstclass mail and still does not process mail because the facility does not have the proper equipment to do so (allegedly known as an “Oregon Machine”). c. CI-1 stated that mail-in ballots were in the gaylords with signatures on the outside envelope at the facility on numerous occasions and asked a supervisor about what to do with them. d. CI-1 was told to just get them loaded onto the trailers for delivery and to get them to their destination. e. CI-1 told us that the Grumman Road Facility is only equipped to process packages and express mail, not first-class mail. f. Doyle and I asked a few more times if CI-1 was sure that ballots were seen at the Grumman Road Facility and CI-1 confirmed each time. 10. On December 2, 2020, after having spoken with a Postal Inspector with knowledge of the Grumman Road Facility (“CI-2”), I asked if the Grumman Road Facility would receive and process first-class mail. CI-2 told me the following: a. The Grumman Road Facility only handles parcel post. b. Mail-in ballots should not have been delivered to the Grumman Road Facility because the facility does not have the processing machines (the Oregon Machine) required to handle the processing of first-class mail or bulk mail. The goal of this lawsuit is to prevent the USPS from interfering in the upcoming election. It is important to note that the shipment picked up by Mr. Morgan was not the only one. It is the only one where John Moynihan and Larry Doyle obtained corroborating evidence. Read more: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/new-complaint-filed-alleging-that-us-postal-service/
New Complaint Filed Alleging that US Postal Service (USPS) Committed Electoral Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Guest post by Larry Johnson at Sonar 21 A new development that merits attention.
thegatewaypundit.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
This is the guy suing me for harming his reputation.
@EFxScout1League - E4rth_Scout1stLeague
Hunter Biden has setup a Global Cooperation Group of 18 people to channel their work with CEFC and #CNOOC expansion to secure Oil & Liquid Natural Gas for China & other investors. That group is still active expanding CNOOC operations in countries alleged https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20140309-141412_117244
Report on the Biden Laptop
There are, at the very least, 459 documented violations of state & federal laws & regulations on the infamous device.
marcopolo501c3.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Kari Lake's case against machines in the 2024 election was dismissed by a federal court in Arizona, but an appeal has been filed at SCOTUS. The appendix contains new evidence, including the alteration of Maricopa County's election software, false representations about EAC certification, and the insecure placement of cryptographic keys by Dominion. These findings raise concerns about the reliability of the machines for future elections. A motion for an expedited hearing at SCOTUS has also been filed.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
UPPERCUT DELIVERED AT SCOTUS!! (Please retweet) Kari Lake‘s case against machines in 2024 was dismissed by a federal court in Arizona on the grounds that it was “too speculative“. Ninth circuit upheld that absurd decision on appeal. Last week Kari Lake/Kurt Olsen filed at SCOTUS an appeal. Last NIGHT they filed the appendix with stunning new evidence. (found in the links below). Here are some key points: 1. Maricopa County’s election software used in the 2020 and 2022 elections has been altered with respect to the machine behavior settings that govern how ballots are read and tabulated. 2. The EAC never approved this altered software, and Maricopa’s many previous representations that this election software is EAC certified, including to the AZ Senate, are false. 3. Knowingly modifying election software without approval or certification pursuant to 16-442 is a felony under AZ law. See 16–1004(B). 4. Dominion’s operative contract with Maricopa states “Data generated by the Democracy Suite Platform, including results reporting, is protected by the deployment of FIPS approved symmetric AES encryption.” 5. But, Dominion placed the master cryptographic keys in plain text and unprotected on the election database except for Windows-login, which are easily bypassed. Leaving these highly sensitive cryptographic keys in this state violates all cyber security protocols and allows a malicious actor to take control of the machine and change results without detection. 6. As Mr. Cotton stated in his declaration “It is like a bank having the most secure vault in the world, touting how secure it is to the public and then taping the combination in large font type on the wall next to the vault door.” 7. Given all of these findings, none of these machines can be trusted to give reliable results in 2024.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
This motion for expedited hearing at SCOTUS was filed last night. https://t.me/PatrickMByrne/7528
Patrick M. Byrne
New filing to SCOTUS: expedite your consideration of last week, Kari Lake filing.
t.me
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
This is the appendix with the new evidence. https://t.me/PatrickMByrne/7529
Patrick M. Byrne
Appendix of the expedited hearing appeal to the Supreme Court
t.me
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Though 70% of the country thinks this, few Republican candidates have the courage to say it. A Republican who will not say this is not worthy of your vote. candidate Mac Warner: 'The election was stolen, and it was stolen by the CIA' - WV MetroNews https://wvmetronews.com/2023/12/11/gubernatorial-candidate-mac-warner-the-election-was-stolen-and-it-was-stolen-by-the-cia/
Gubernatorial candidate Mac Warner: 'The election was stolen, and it was stolen by the CIA' - WV MetroNews
Warner, currently the state's chief elections officer, has taken a consistent public position of casting doubt on the presidential election.
wvmetronews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Allegations: ICC prosecutor Jack extorted Europeans, threatening indictments for a 1997 murder unless paid. DOJ-SDNY aware since April 2022, concealed it. DOJ warns Jack: target Trump or face consequences. Choagies claimed I fled Europe, but I clarified I was pursuing something. Now you understand.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Allegations: 1. As prosecutor in ICC Jack extorted Europeans: "We know you killed a guy in 1997, pay me or I indict you." 2. DOJ-SDNY knew since April 2022 & buried it. 3. DOJ to Jack: "You get Trump or we get you." https://deepcapture.com/2023/12/extortionist-jack-smith-is-being-extorted-to-pursue-trump/
Is Extortionist Jack Smith Being Extorted to Pursue Trump? – Deep Capture
deepcapture.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
For months choagies have asserted I was running around Europe fleeing. I replied, "I am not fleeing I'm chasing." And now you know what I meant.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
What a setup
@PamelaHensley22 - PAMELA HENSLEY🇺🇸
This is a good way to start a riot. Spray pepper spray into the face of a peaceful protester on J6. What a complete setup. https://t.co/D4TNal2xiC
reSee.it AI Summary
In a major development, counterfeit Fulton County Georgia ballots were discovered in the Atlanta warehouse. Our operative obtained photos of these fake ballots, highlighting their significant quantity. Following this revelation, the Georgia Senate Judiciary voted to inspect the ballots. However, the situation took a suspicious turn as rented Enterprise moving vans arrived at the warehouse and began loading up. Additionally, a shredding company was engaged, employing military-grade shredding techniques. Despite the inability to upload the video, it captures the enterprise vans arriving at 10 o'clock at night, after the Senate subcommittee's investigation vote. Notably, samples of the counterfeit ballots were obtained for further examination.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
BIG NEWS: COUNTERFEIT FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA BALLOTS. On a tip, our operative entered the Fulton County (Atlanta) Warehouse and took this series of photos: THESE ARE FAKE BALLOTS (note the quantity):
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
On Wednesday afternoon in the Georgia Senate Judiciary voted to have these ballots inspected. What happened next?
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Rented Enterprise moving vans pulled up to the warehouse and began loading up. I will post that video promptly.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
And then, a shredding company was engaged. They shredded everything. Not just a normal shredding either. They did not shred into long strips, or even tiny confetti: they did military-grade shredding down to tiny spitballs.😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
The video of the enterprise van is too big for me to upload right here. But trust me, there is a video of enterprise moving vans pulling up at 10 o’clock at night, after the Senate subcommittee voted to investigate the stuff, and they got loaded up.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Oh, I guess I should mention: we grabbed samples of the fake ones.😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
I was in the background on this one aspect of the audit. 50,000 ballots out of 2.1 million were randomly selected and tested. 0 of them were on VoteSecure paper.
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's recent intelligence failure has been attributed to the Biden administration's actions. The cyber-warfare community and its political discontents in Israel have been affected. The blame lies with Anthony Blinken, Avril Haines, and Dan Shapiro. For more details, refer to the provided links. #Israel #IntelligenceFailure #BidenAdministration
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
What REALLY Caused Israel's Foggy Intel? Read it Here 1st. The MSM has the what and the why, but not the how. Let me tell you what really caused this catastrophic failure in Israeli intelligence last Saturday. As my regulars are aware, I have spent some time this year in Israel, in the technology and start-up community, pursuing a couple of blockchain investments. In that capacity, I have come to learn a thing or two about the Israeli cyber-warfare community and its political discontents. Tune in here to hear me describe political events in that community over the last 2+ years, and how the real blame for this intelligence catastrophe should be placed with the machinations of the Biden Regime, and in particular, SoS Anthony Blinken, DNI Avril Haines, and Dan Shapiro. FOR ADDITIONAL READING https://www.ft.com/content/11cb394d-a13e-4826-b580-823b9367fedb https://carolineglick.com/ehud-baraks-complicated-position-in-israeli-politics-and-industry/ https://www.intelligenceonline.com/government-intelligence/2023/01/16/netanyahu-s-cabinet-pushes-for-changes-to-cyber-export-rules,109902045-art https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/03/27/executive-order-on-prohibition-on-use-by-the-united-states-government-of-commercial-spyware-that-poses-risks-to-national-security/
Video Transcript AI Summary
On October 7th, Israel experienced a major intelligence failure, which the speaker attributes to the destruction of the Israeli cybersecurity industry. The speaker claims that the Biden administration, along with Israeli politicians Ehud Barak, Benny Gantz, and Yair Lapid, worked together to favor a company called Paragon and snuff out its competitors. This resulted in a significant intelligence blind spot for Israel. The speaker also discusses protests in Israel against judicial reform and the perceived snobbery of the Supreme Court. The speaker suggests that these events are connected and criticizes the actions of the Biden administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team. Patrick here. On Saturday, October 7th, Yom Kippur, Israel, had a massive intelligence failure as we all know at this point, and likely the greatest one since the Yom Kippur War of 1973. So there's a lot being said about where that, intelligence failure came from. This is oddly enough by one of these weird coincidence coincidences that seem to permeate my life.
I have some knowledge of this. I I've I have some knowledge of this only because, the Israeli venture capital in, Silicon Valley of Israel has reached out to me 3 or 4 years ago for and I started spending some time there in a with, like, venture capitalists and and entrepreneurs and working on, you know, blockchain projects and stuff like this. But in the that context, I've learned quite a bit about, and I think I have an explanation of what's happened here that is not in any press that I've seen so far. So I'm going to include some links with this video so you can read that will fill you in or confirm different of the fragments that I'm going to be giving you, but I'm gonna be putting these together in a way I don't see anyone yet, explaining in the mainstream press how unsurprised I should be by then I have notes I wanna walk through carefully. So, so just so you know, the Israeli cyber security industry has really been, for 20 years, at the leading edge of the world.
And cybersecurity includes developing the tools that people like intelligence agencies use to hack folks and spy on them and track them on cell phones and figure out what their plans are going forward and things like that. Israel's really been very, you know, right up there neck and neck with the US, you might and having this very leading edge, huge cyber spyware type industry that came about this way. In Israel has its own version of the NSA. It's called 82100. And these really smart Jewish kids get they get tracked into that, they come out and, boy, are they smart?
They make up much of the Israeli version of Silicon Valley came comes through that army unit or that defense But, so there's just a lot of knowledge in that community that has been kinda since I've been in and out of it for for 3 or 4 years now, could spend several months this year. Again, I'm working on a blockchain project, there, but I've been funding. But, so I'm a I've had been over time and sort of let in on how certain things are. Just so you know, within that spyware within that cybersecurity industry, there's a company called Paragon that's very important. Now there there's another one called NSO that you may have heard about that had Pegasus that thing called Pegasus.
It had a competitor called Paragon. Paragon was very well connected, has been very well connected with US Democratic well, let's say the Uniparty, the, the so, Avril Hines, was on the board of advisers as was Tony Anthony Blinken, as was that guy Shapiro, Dan Shapiro, the the Obama ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, they were all advisors to Paragon, but Paragon was just one of a real hotbed of competing cybersecurity firms in in in Israel. And, of course, by having that leading edge cybersecurity start up in, start ups going there, not just start they grew into real powerful companies, that gave Israeli intelligence a wonderful edge, and they have first access to the tool. The tool's really probably being developed for them as their internal customer and who the heck knows, but they had they the Israeli intelligence had greatly benefited from having this fecund cybersecurity, environment right there and just on the beach by down the beach from Tel Aviv. Well, when president Biden gets elected with a Barry Bonds red asterisk, he brings in to office Avril Aviv Avril Hameen.
Avril Hines became, director of national intelligence, and I actually hear she's quite smart. She's not well, Anthony Blinken, became secretary estate, he's a think tank asshole, just another think tank asshole. And I don't know what Shapiro, but they, I don't know if he has an official in this administration, but they're all thick as thieves, they started playing these games that destroyed the Israeli cybersecurity industry with the exception of the company that's their company and they have ownership in, and they're on the board of advisers and things like that. How did they do that? Well, Biden, by using, Biden helps all kinds of regulations and export control abilities and stuff that can throttle or help various firms.
In particular, he started using the work of an NGO in Canada named CitizensLab. CitizensLab deals with the implications of technology within human rights, and it writes reports about that, and it accuses some firms of infringing people's writes, and the firms it names, it went through it did all this stuff crashing all the competitors, the Israeli competitors of Paragon, and then Biden used these CitizensLab reports to write to write executive orders that basically shut them out, shut all those firms out that were not Paragon. All the Israeli firms that competed with Paragon got closed out of the marketplace. Singapore got rid of 1 firm that was the backbone of their, cyber intelligence, and they brought in Paragon. Israel did the same thing itself.
So they use this this these political connections were used to snuff out or at least greatly throttle, but in many cases, snuffed out a bunch of these firms that competed with Paragon, Paragon being the firm that had Anthony Blinken, and Dan Shapiro, and Avril Hines on their board of advisers, these very highly connected Democrat, were a union party establishment folks in DC. So they so Biden gets elected. They end up or at least 2 of them end up in very senior roles. Oh, and as by the way, as the DNI, Avril Lavigne. I keep saying Avril Lavigne.
I used to know a girl who was all very Avril Lavigne, like a, Abol Haines, and Anthony Blinken as the secretary of state and the DNI, they're the ones who really can control, it can do this and write the regulations that basically freezes out these other companies. So and that's what they did. That's what they did. They that's they used their power, and that's what to squash this cybersecurity industry of Israel with the exception of Paragon. I mean, not completely.
I don't mean to overstate it, but very much throttle. So Ehud Barak Hud Barak, I'm not gonna go into that that figure in Israeli politics, but Barak knew this was going on. And he did he he knew that by snuffing at these other firms on which Israeli intelligence depended, it would be creating an intelligence blind spot. Didn't seem to care. Yair Lapid, who was the PM before Bibi, and the Gans administration, they, in in cahoots with the Biden administration snuffed out.
They were really so Biden didn't do this on his own or just with Advil Hines or or Dan Shapiro or Anthony Blinken, they did it working with these folks in Israel, the Ehud Barak folks, which in which are Gantz and Lapir, and they work together to favor Paragon and snuff out. And by Biden writing me, by by the approvals that our DNI and secretary of state gave and didn't give, and Biden backed him up with executive orders. They they greatly throttled and snub and or snuffed out the the Israeli competition to Paragon. Now now let's move forward to another block. I'll be fitting these together at the very end.
There have been protests going on in Israel that seem that, this year against Netanyahu. Now I don't have a dog in this fight. I don't know enough to opine intelligently other than from I mean, I've listened to a lot of people on both sides explain, and it sure sounds reminiscent of some other battles. I here's the basic problem. There's a Supreme Court in Israel, and it doesn't have a written constitution.
And when the parliament passes something, like Knesset passes something, they can pass laws and that the Supreme Court can strike down as basically just giving them a bad feeling. It violates the fun fundamental spirit of Israel, that and even though there's no written constitution, they can say it's unconstitutional on that ground on that ground. And the people of Israel have gotten kinda sick of this. And it just so happens that out of historically, in the life of Israel since 1948, there have been I may be off by the numbers by a smidge, but it's like there have been 88 supreme court justices is over time, and 87 of them have been Ashkenazim. Just in case you're not up on your matters Judaic, there's 2 types of Jewish people, the Sephardim who, look like Arabs to the American eye, and Ashkenazi, which are white European white, and they're they're both Jewish.
There's a whole thing that they kinda Ashkena, the white ones look down at the dark ones. I gotta tell you, it's true. There's it's they look down at them, or at least the dark ones feel that way. And they're more of the masses at this point. What they feel is, gee, we, we look at all these problems we face.
We pass laws that we think balance everything as it should be, personal security needs of the country, whatever. And these our supreme court, which is almost always exclusively the white Jews sit up there and look down their nose at us darker skinned Jews and say, and say, no, that violates the fundamental laws of spirit of Israel, so we're we're negating that law. And these Sephardim Jews are a little tired of it. And it's very much in their mind associated with snobbery and this white European superiority sense that they're superior. It just reminds me if you've watched my videos, you know that I often speak of how I feel now about intellectuals in America.
I, they are I've spent my life, and, you know, and admired many for many reasons. But one thing that's consistent well, look. As an entrepreneur, you spend your whole life kind of with an imaginary judge over your shoulder and everything you do, you know, at some point, you're gonna have to turn around and explain it. And I've been caught up for years and 1,000,000 of dollars in fees and so on and so forth, none none ever goes anywhere, but having to explain to these kinds of people why make decisions, and they're basically, the way I do, and their attitude's always basically well. You know, if I had been in that position, how I would've made that decision?
Well, I've seen those people in that position in business settings. I've seen them. In fact, I've had this unique position of having hired a number of kids out of great schools of America who subsequently went into law and, and in some of the most useless people I ever hired from very strong schools, were the ones who I mean, when I think of there were some who were the most useless as employees, couldn't work, couldn't function, couldn't add anything to a team, couldn't function like an adult on a team, people that just, you know, would give it 6 or 9 months in private industry in this side. It's not for them. We go off to law school who, like, have double, you know, perfect scores on their LSATs and go to the best law schools and then go become federal clerks are the best judges and these kinds of I have seen them in action, and they are the most useless at deciding or being able to reason your way through something.
But they become the people who afterwards get these jobs where they're, like, looking down at the rest of society and basically saying, well, if I had been in your position and had to make that decision, this would have been the right way to make the decision. Yeah, I've seen them. They can't find their ass with both hands. So this complaint that this that the largely the Sephardim Jews, but I don't mean to say exclusively. The worker bees, Israeli said the the I don't wanna say the deplorables, but the man the people did Israeli version of what Hillary Clinton calls horribles in the US, those people feel like, gee, whatever that they're looked down on by a bunch of these snobs on the Supreme Court who 87 out of 88 throughout history have been white Ashkenazi Jews looking down at them and and on this very vague, unwritten institution saying, well, that law you you ravel passed isn't constitutional because it violates the basic spirit of it.
So that's really at the core of this at the political debate in Israel because Netanyahu came in, and he said, we can't have that anymore. We're gonna have judicial reform. And the elite of Israel have gone ballistic. It's just like it's mapped right on to what's in the US with Trump. The elite have gone ballistic, and they want this there these snobs want this, you know, want it to stay the way it is.
So that's the and they have driven a color revolution. And there's for all year, and I was in and out of visual at the beginning of the year few times, feeling again, there's a wonderful, anyway, I've I don't wanna mix up this video. There's a blockchain, Ward. We'll get back to it. So I've seen these protests.
And it turns out, by the way, the US State Department and NGOs and stuff are behind it. I think the guy's name, Thomas Naids or something. There's an American official in the back of all this. It's movement warfare. I mean, that's what the world has learned over the last decade that you don't go to war against the country.
You've you form a movements and shape the country's politics with movements. The US State Department's doing that to Israel, to the legitimately elected government of Israel. Anyway, in these protests, there has been a woman, and I'm gonna put her picture with this. Her name's Sheikha Bresler. Sheikha Bresler is an Israeli physicist.
She worked at CERN. She's also and this is not I think this is illegal for me to say in Israel. I'm not in Israel. But, Shikma Bresser's husband is a very highly placed guy in, in, I think, Shabbat. So there's 3.
There's military intelligence, which is man. There's Mossad, reaches foreign intelligence. There's domestic security, which is we also call it, I think, Shin Bet, or and he's a very high level guy. It's just like what we have in the US where Peter Strach's wife's over at the SEC bringing causing trouble for companies that they, you know, that'd be these married couples this is happening a lot in DC. There are married couples across the bureaucracy, even have some name for it, and it it's unhealthy.
Anyway, she was out there. Shikma Breslau was out there leading these leading these crowds and leading these protests, these huge protests. And she would say, and I'm being specific. And, again, this is all of these articles I'm putting links to below, that I'm crowds I'm talking for 10,000 people in the intelligence services, in the spyware industry, and in the army. And we're warning the government that you will not have the intelligence serve we're warning Netanyahu you will not have the intelligence services or the government behind you if you go forward with this judicial reform.
So Shikmah has been telling these crowds it's all year that if we she's been threatening Netanyahu. If you go forward with these judicial reforms, you're not gonna have the army and intelligence services with you, and I'm speaking for 10,000 people across across them. She also said she warned that there would be a, that the there would be a blank spot at the end of September in intelligence that because of this she like part of her threat was that come the end of September, there's going to be a blank spot or fog in in Israeli intelligence, and we don't care. That's how that was part of her threat. That was part of her threat, and in August, late August, Barak went ahead and got the 1st step done of a much more milder judicial reform.
It just doesn't mean we have these platonic gods in the sky who look down on us and decide, you know, what we I mean, they said the Israeli system set up. It's like they're these in Plato's Republic, they're these elders who they get to sit in the special council and look down and, all the the the people have got the country's gotten all you know, that that's just for intellectuals. They love to view the world that way because they dream of being those people. You know, let me go start an ice cream shop and see how they're how if they really wanna that that's how you're supposed to get there. But they she actually threatened that.
Shikna Bressler threatened that come the end of September, there would be a, blank spot, in in Israeli cyber capabilities. That was part of the threat she was making against, against Netanyahu. Well, yes, the reason there is that blank spot is because of Paragon and Joe Biden and all the competitors do not all the competitors do Paragon. Yeah. All the competitors to Paragon being at least throttled and some snuffed.
So, yes, Israeli has a intelligence blind spot. They had this wonderful their intelligence community was supported by this wonderful industry that some some folks in Israel in conjunction with Biden and, Anthony Blinken and Avril Hines and Dan Shapiro, who had some some really close connection to just one of those companies, so they snuffed out. They wrote the regulations and the export licenses and this and that and the other thing to snuff out all of its competitors. And what do you know? Pardon me, having been successful at doing that, yes, precisely as Bresler warned, you know, this summer, threatened, yes, there is gonna be a blank spot show up now in is, in the Israeli intelligence view of the world.
That's because but that's because of what they did. That's because of what Biden and Houd Barrack and his people have done and Avril Hines and so forth. They're the ones who did it. And so the industry that industry which which so supported the Israeli intelligence community by getting such a a torpedo below the waterline, sent from Washington DC. That's what crippled Israel.
That's what's that's what's created the biggest, intelligence blind spot since the Yom Kippur War of 1973. Hope the Israelis have learned. I presume they have learned, on Yom Kippur, I'm well, it said never turn out the lights. Let's just always stay on alert on Yom Kippur. Incidentally, something that lends some credibility to this is hours before the attack, just like 6 hours before the attack, Iran posted two photos of the Israelis, Ehud Barak and Gantz.
Gantz being Gantz and Yair Lapid were the 2 politicians, that really did the dirty work of eliminating the Israeli cyber come intelligence community other than Paragon. So just hours before, hours before Hamas strikes, Iran puts up photos of Barack and Ghans, general Ghans, compromising photos. I didn't even look at them. Someone described them to me, but everyone was, like, in their underwear or the bottle of whiskey kind of stuff. Nothing a 100 Biden has, but more like PG 13 kinda stuff, I suppose.
Not not not the sweetest hardcore rating that 100 Biden gets. Those were the 2 mo so so Iran posted, hours before the attack, the 2 people who I'm telling you are most responsible for destroying the the spyware community, community in Israel and and and thus enabling this attack. And this so Iran it's not just me saying this now. It's Iran saying Okay? So I thought, I thought given what Trump said last night, people are interpreting it at the normal superficial level that everything seems to be interpreted by the American media.
I would just mention Trump is right. It would not have happened to Israel had he still been president. And that's need not be any because of any decisions he would've made or have made. What he wouldn't have done is what Joe Biden has done. Joe Biden and Avril Hine and Dan Shapiro and Anthony Blinken to favor their pet over an Israel paragon and use the power of American, you know, pen in the White House to take steps as is described in all these articles I'm mentioning there that snuffed out, that were greatly handicapped the rest of all all of Paragon's competitors ended all this stuff to favor to the point that they lost contracts and got kicked out of countries and such.
Well, since the Israeli Shabbat, intel you know, domestic intelligence and security depends so much on, that vibe depended so much on that vibrant community by these people stepping at these American guy politicians stepping around, and probably because they have they're in cahoots with Paragon, or they're at least on the advisory board, no doubt to have economic interest, that's what created this blind spot in Israeli intelligence, this talking Joe Biden and his group of goons. Okay? Just so you know, one man's opinion only.
Cyberweapon manufacturers plot to stay on the right side of US
Contrasting fates of Israeli spyware-makers Paragon and NSO reveal how American support is crucial in $12bn industry
ft.com
Ehud Barak's Complicated Position in Israeli Politics and Industry - CarolineGlick.com
Barak’s position in the United States is strong but precarious. On the one hand, he enjoys close relations with senior U.S. political and national security officials. On the other hand, Barak’s name has come up as one of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s associates.
carolineglick.com
ISRAEL : Netanyahu's cabinet pushes for changes to cyber export rules - 16/01/2023 - Intelligence Online
Israel's new administration is looking at easing rules governing the export of offensive cybertools, which were tightened in 2021 following international outcry over the use of NSO's Pegasus spyware. - 1/16/2023
intelligenceonline.com
Executive Order on Prohibition on Use by the United States Government of Commercial Spyware that Poses Risks to National Security | The White House
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. Technology is central to the future of our national security, economy, and democracy. The United States has fundamental national security and foreign policy interests…
whitehouse.gov
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Michigan Soros Goons have backs against the wall. They are lashing out with lawfare so extreme it crosses into law-breaking and, I think, sedition.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Patrick Byrne discusses the legal maneuvering in Michigan and the involvement of attorney Stephanie Lambert. He highlights the importance of women in fighting for the future and mentions a study that shows how increasing women's income leads to improved well-being for children. Byrne explains how Lambert was hired by sheriffs and town clerks to investigate election fraud in Michigan. He criticizes the special prosecutor and attorney general for their unethical behavior, including fabricating evidence and threatening witnesses. Byrne suggests that those involved in the coup against election integrity may be committing capital crimes and warns that they may face consequences in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team. Patrick Byrne here. I'm gonna be talking to you today about the events in Michigan, the legal maneuvering in Michigan. And this may be too inside baseball and maybe only of interest to lawyers or something. I'm I'm going to not be too technical.
But just understand that when there's any law legal process, there is motions and then there's people responding to the motions and then rebuttals to the response and rebuttals to that and blah blah blah. And you can get these whole trees on every little single point of a legal matter. So it can get kinda complicated to explain, let alone follow. I'm gonna keep it as simple as possible. There's this wonderful attorney in Michigan who is it's gonna be a statue of her someday, this bulldog of an attorney named Stephanie Lambert love her.
You know, I've I've been reminded in the last 3 years, how it's women at the end of the day who have backbones and women think about the future. I gotta I can't let this moment pass without reminding you of a story I've told before when I was doing grad, development economics, I had this wonderful professor, actually, I was teaching assistant for Partha Dasgupta. He should've won a Nobel. He's never won a Nobel, but he was wonderful. He's a type of, he's a he's now knighted and such over in Britain.
Anyway, he was at Stanford, and I was his teaching fellow or his teaching assistant for a year. And I remember him teaching this paper that at Stanford undergrads about how if you take a village in India and you increase you take 2 identical villages and one's the control group. The other, you increase the income of men and you look for any improvement in the standard of well-being which you measure incidentally by the weight of children, it's a great way to measure all in, rubber meets the road, well-being in a village, and increase the income of men and yet no increase in the weight of children, again, an increase as he said in consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and hookers, and they've done the same experiment all over the world. That's what you get. You increase the income of women, and you immediately see this dramatic increase in the weight of children.
Women think about the future, and this been done in Central Asia, Africa, South America, I think Western Ireland in the late seventies, it's the same phenomenon. Women think about the improvements in their well-being immediately translate into family well-being, and children's well-being, raising income of men is a waste of time. So that's one thing to know. And it reminds me, I've relearned that lesson in the last few years because the the people who have really been most uncorruptible, most resolute have almost all been women. Men back down, men have other objectives, men play other games.
The real kamikaze people in our movement is so often has been women. And they when I get to know them, they say, look, I've got 3 kids. I'm not gonna let my kids grow up under tyranny, blah blah blah. I mean, they're the ones who will take this all the way to the firing squad. Lambert's one of them.
She's got 3 kids, wonderful woman, was a prosecutor, you know, from she's from Detroit or from Michigan, was a prosecutor in Detroit for some years, very proud. You can rattle off statistics like, you know, we had half the caseload of LA County and 1 tenth the budget. And so they the load on each attorney is just tremendous. And so she she did that for 12 years then went into private practice herself. She had pulled into all this election stuff because of what happened in Michigan.
She was hired by so as you should all know about now, if you've been following my stuff, Michigan, the day Michigan has a Soros goon as the secretary of state and one as the attorney general. The day after the election or shortly after the election of 2020, the attorney general sent out word to everybody in the election system in Michigan to erase their thumb drives, erase all their hard drives, everything. Well, that's an unlawful order. There's a federal law that says you gotta keep everything for 22 months. So she sent out this order to, like, 1500 people across Michigan.
Dozens of said this is unlawful, and we're not gonna follow it. And they went to local sheriffs and said, look, I've been told to erase this. I can't keep this. I'm giving it to you. The sheriffs, I think there were originally 4 of them, got this secret investigation going, which they have the right to do.
In fact, they were the prime chief legal officer to investigate election fraud doesn't go to the DOJ, the FBI, state's attorneys general. It's the local sheriff because he's elected by the people. You know, America is very lucky in that sense. We have 3,000 sheriffs who were elected directly by the people. Your first line of defense in the law is a guy whose report reports to the people, not up some bureaucratic chain which can be corrupted.
The sheriff started an investigation. Darleaf was the leader. They hired Stephanie Lambert, this former prosecutor, which they're perfectly legal to do. Plus there were some town clerks and county clerks who this law says, if they think there is mischief or they suspect they can start their own investigation and they can hire an outside lawyer to do it. So that way, if the whole system's corrupt, there's still a way for honest people within it to get progress and get get things redressed.
So the sheriffs had the total clear legal authority to do it and so did the town prosecutors or town clerks. They all hired Stephanie, turned over these things they'd been asked to erase. Stephanie brought in the best forensics guys on all this in the country, people like Ben Cotton, Eric Spakina, Jim Penrose, Doug Logan was brought in incidentally. I I believe I don't think it was central to her efforts. Well, the bad guys are on the run.
And as their last move, as they're on the run, they're just trying to throw everybody in prison. They're just trying to jail everybody and intimidate them, but their cases are so weak as you're gonna see. They're just this is what lawfare does. They the process is the punishment. These people now know that we have all this evidence that is leading directly to them.
So it was a last resort. This year, they have started bringing indictments against, you know, they tried to indict these sheriffs, Stephanie and the expert witnesses she brought, which is absurd because, you know, for centuries, lawyers hire expert witness, witnesses who can analyze things and that they can't. And the sheriff's had the right to be doing, and and the town clerks had the right to be doing what they did, including hiring Stephanie. So the whole thing is frivolous to begin with. But they just are counting on being able to grind people down with legal fees and scare them until they until they surrender.
Now, however, it has become in that, you know, There's a a range within which lawyers and prosecutors can do that and keep a straight face that says, well, we're just trying to enforce the law. No. At some point, you're being goons. And I know these people who love to speak a lot, or they think law fair is noble. They're law professors, and they think it's noble.
Well, everyone's allowed to use the law any way they want. Well, at some point, no, what you're what you're doing is disgraceful. And how these how the Michigan apparatus, apparatchics have come after Stephanie Lambert is not just disgraceful, I think it's something worse and we'll be getting to that at the end of my video. But basically, folks, I want you to know that those who'd be involved in this, in my eyes, you're contributing to a soft coup, You're contributing to a coup. And when all of this unwrapped, when all of this is finished unraveling and we have rule of law again, I'm under the impression that there is at least 3 people running for president who are quite happy to hear my thoughts about things.
3 people. And, and it was my position that you're contributing to a coup which I think is a capital crime. I think that lawyers involved in this are actually committing capital crimes because they are covering up, a not just the election fraud in Michigan, but they're playing a role in trying to further and, and poor under cement, the whole election of November 3, 2020. So I think that they're actually committing capital crimes. A capital crime is a crime for which there is capital punishment in order.
And I think these people are committing capital, crimes. You tell me what you think at the end of this speech. So first of all, just to give you an idea of how corrupt the people are. One of the investigators against Stephanie in this case, the Michigan state police guy named, Fuller. I've put up.
I'm having to split this into 2 pieces because on locals, you can't load 2 PDFs and a JPEG into 1. So look below this video with the preceding post as well or the adjoining one, and you'll get you'll get some of this. Fuller was recently this the one of the key investigators against her. So first thing you should know is that the attorney general tried to bring this within her own office and she had 30 or 40 attorneys in her own office say, fuck you. I'm not touching this.
I'm not putting my fingerprints on what is clearly a blatantly political act. So she went out, that prosecutor and I mean, that attorney general and hired a special prosecutor to bring all this only after her entire staff said we're not gonna be involved in this case against Stephanie Lambert and the sheriff that you're trying to drum up. So she went outside and got a special prosecutor. An investigator in the case is a guy named Trooper Fuller. Trooper Fuller was recently nailed for a $14,500,000 civil penalty because of a investigation he was involved in some years ago where they completely abrogated somebody's civil rights and they fabricated evidence.
They fabricated evidence, and now a Michigan court has gone all the way through the court system, and this guy has been, has lost a $14,500,000 judgment. That's a trooper who is so dirty that the juries and the other and judge in a different courtroom is saying we're making a you know, that's a really dirty trooper. When they're getting a $14,500,000 awards against them for fabricating evidence and lying and such that can make somebody, that's a bad guy. So that's just the investigator on one of the key investigators on this witch hunt against Stephanie Lambert, just to give you an idea of the kind of people we're dealing with here. But I wanna go further.
I wanna tell you about 2 more 2 things. 1 is the defendant of Stephanie's motion now, again, you're gonna find these PDFs either with this video or in the adjoining post on locals. The prosecutor, there's all these laws that govern what prosecutors can say as if they got a grand jury working on somebody, and, you know, getting close to indictment or they they can't say it. They can't just go out and say, we're about to indict this person. That's like mucho illegal, molto illegal.
Okay, that that prosecutor, the special prosecutor, Dale, Hinson Hilton did just that before he even had Stephanie indicted. And, you know, a New York Supreme Court attorney named Saul Wexell said back 50 years ago, a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indite a ham sandwich. Doesn't mean anything that these people have been But this prosecutor was working on indicting Stephanie Lambert and said to the press that we are close to an indictment against her. Well, that's super bad. You're really that's not a little thing.
In addition, a special prosecutor can't do something like create an identical civil case to bring against somebody to get information or whatever, whatever to bring back to then use in their criminal prosecution. There's a specific law against that in Michigan. That is exactly what the special prosecutor did, brought a identical civil complaint against Stephanie that would give away for the for and brought it to the same judge who was the judge for the special prosecution and got the judge to make a favorable, ridiculous, but favorable ruling that then would help in the criminal matter. Well, that's sorta I mean, there's law fair and there's law fair. That's not law fair.
That's violating the law. There's a specific law against doing that in Michigan, exactly what they did. And the fact that a judge in a special prosecution matter would allow this prosecutor to create a civil case to play these Mickey Mouse games and do this tells us that the judge is in on the judge's accoutes because that's wildly inappropriate for the judge to even take part of part in. So the special prosecutor should be disqualified just just disqualified just for having engaged in that act, creating a separate parallel civil case, and so as to develop information and get rules that could then use in criminal case. It's illegal, and they did anyway, and Stephanie has moved that that that this special prosecutor should be thrown off just for having done that.
So so now you know the investigator is bad because they got a $14,500,000 judgment for fabricating evidence in a different in a different case recently, the prosecutor is playing these kinds of games with a judge who apparently is in cahoots for creating a you know, the attorney general couldn't get her own prosecutors to bring it. So she hired this outside dirty prosecutor, Ilson, who's to be a special prosecutor and play these games and the judge allowed it at least 1 round of it. So Stephanie has made a motion that the whole this whole thing should be shut down just because of that act. In addition, that special prosecutor leaked to the press, I'm about to indite Stephanie Lambert, which is another I think it's a crime. It's certainly all kinds of things that are problematic.
So the whole case should be thrown out because of that. But now we get to the Pia de la Renaissance. He it turns out that that spent so in the course of going after Stephanie and her people, she's gone after Stephanie's, like her own investigators and, guys like Ben Cotton and Doug Logan, people are all upset that they're cooperating. They haven't they haven't done anything wrong. It's fine for them to say, Yeah.
I'll cooperate. I'll go in, and I'll answer your questions. They answer the questions and, you know, whether any answer to the questions, there's nothing illegal here. So that's all. And Ben Cotton.
Ben Cotton, I think, is a Green Beret before he became this cyber guy 25 years ago. He's solid. But this work gets interesting. The special prosecutor, her office brought in Stephanie's investigator and threatened him. Now his with, his they but they don't have any laws about what do you think he he hasn't broken any laws.
Lawyers hire, you know, the town clerks had the right to turn over these hard drives and thumb drives to start their own investigation and hire a lure to do it, and they hired and it says right in the Michigan law, they can. So they hired Stephanie, and then Stephanie had an expert witnesses, expert forensic guys who examined this stuff and deconstructed how how this works. I mean, we really have it down to the molecular level. And they there's nothing wrong with that. That's what lawyers do.
They're not supposed to be computer experts themselves. So There was nothing for this special prosecutor to go after Stephanie's investigators with, but brought 1 in, harangued them, the the special prosecutor's office beat this investigator up, threatened them with loss of license. Now, remember, the investigator's license in Michigan comes from some bureau. It's called LARA or SARAH or something that report. I don't know what it stands for, but it reports to the attorney general.
So the attorney general has a special prosecutor threatening somebody to help put Stephanie away. And if you don't, we're gonna we can use the attorney general can use that other office to take away your law license. Well, I mean, your not law license, your investigator's license, your private investigator's license. And but couldn't actually define what was just saying this in order to get the person cooperate, but doesn't have any, any specifics about what the law just trying to get the person to agree, yes, we broke the law or something like this. Here's what's funny.
There was a secret tape being made. Now the providence of this secret tape, I don't know, wasn't me. But when the special counsel's office had in Stephanie's investigator and was beating him up. It was all being recorded. I it appears it was being recorded by this by the special counsel's office.
That must have been that. The and here's the thing. They turned over a transcript, but what they had not realized was in the when they were meeting with that special with the the special counsel's office of Michigan was meeting with that investigator, at one point, they kicked them out of the room and continued their conversation. And they they say, we don't have anything here. And they we got nothing here.
What should we threaten them with? They talk openly about we can't bring the case up here. You know, they clearly know it's ridiculous. We gotta find a forum where we can bring it. We'll we'll have a friendly judge that will get that will let it stick.
They're saying this horrible stuff, way, way prosecutorial misconduct, lose your bar license kind of stuff if you're a lawyer taking part as a prosecutor in that kind of shenanigans. And here's what happened. In the transcript that came out of this that got turned over to Stephanie. They turned over this, but they also turned somehow she got ahold of the recording. Maybe somebody made a mistake, maybe whatever.
And Stephanie had somebody compare the transcript with the actual recording. And what it turns out is there was a point where these, there was a point where the Stephanie's people stepped out of were instructed to step out of the room. They stepped out of the room, and these dirty Michigan special prosecutors office people kept talking. And it was all in the secret recording or in the recording that nobody had known. Well, I don't think Stephanie's side knew it was being made, but it was in that recording.
And then when it got transcribed, somebody gave orders to leave all that out of the transcription. Anyway, somebody's on the special counsel side made a mistake, and this all ended up in the hands of Stephanie who had somebody listen to the tape as they read the transcript. And what they discovered was that transcript had this big missing section. And the missing section is the Michigan special prosecutor's office sitting there alone debating how to rig something up, absolutely breaking the law, how to jury shop, how to threaten this guy when we don't have anything, what can we threaten them with, how not sure shop, forum shop, how to that we're not gonna do it in these counties. We're gonna find some way to shoehorn this into a different county because we got this judge down there, you know, really incriminating stuff, really incriminating stuff.
And that's all down in the hands of Stephanie Lambert. So she has also filed a motion to say, you have to turn over to compel discovery. You have to turn over all these recordings. We're not interested in your transcripts anymore. You have these recordings.
We want all your recordings, secret and otherwise, have to be turned over. And here's the proof that you've already done it once, that you had a secret recording and a transcript turns out to have been incomplete. And the whoever gave the order to to doctor that transcript, so it was missing the important session, committed a crime. I mean, it goes on and on and on. So what's happening is this is what happens when you're addicted to narrative and not truth.
These guys are all about narrative and their narrative has to be, you know, the whole case in Michigan is very clear. We're we really put all the pieces together. We have it all more and more. And more and more at all the trail all leads to the state government, the attorney general, and the secretary of state. And the more it does, they've gotten desperate to unleash some counter offensive on Stephanie and their own state attorneys general office workers, lawyers refused to take part because they know what's going on.
So that dirty attorney general had to go outside, hire a Soros. That Soros attorney general had to go outside her own office, create a new special prosecutor's office, got in. The special prosecutor was extremely sketchy for the reason I've just been laying out, an investigator, a state trooper working for them trying to put who turns out himself to just been dinged for $14,500,000 for fabricating evidence and lying and such in an unrelated case. And we now have the tape. Not only was the not only has that special prosecutor broken the law by by he had this one action going against Stephanie created a parallel identical, civil case where he and the friendly judge could shoehorned something into existence that helped him in the criminal case, which is a direct violation of Michigan statute for both him and the judge to take part in.
And then in response, here's what's funny, the that prosecutor committed another crime because in the response to Stephanie's motion to disqual him follow him for having to do that, he made a response to the court that that says, no, it's okay what I did because these were separate facts. Well, there aren't separate facts. You look at the 2 pleadings of the exact same set of facts. And in addition, in referring to the court, he left out governing law. Now when a jerk what a lawyer argues to a judge, that lawyer has to explain all the governing, has to list all the governing law and cases and such, favorable and unfavorable so the judge has the whole packet.
And leaving some out is really a way to try to trick the court. That's a big no no that you lose your bar license over. So he filed this ridiculous answer to Stephanie's motion where he said, well, My civil case was not based on the same set of facts as this as the as the criminal case, so it was okay to do. He was lying about that. You read the pleadings.
It's the same absolutely the same set of facts. And in addition, he deliberately left out some key citations that really makes it cross the boundaries that he left out key law so he misinformed the court of what the law is. Interestingly, that special prosecutor didn't put his own name on that filing. A junior woman in his law office, a junior woman, her name is on it. She's the one who wrote it, and we can tell because she has a unique writing and he's a very junior, fresh young lawyer, and the special prosecutor didn't even put his own name on it.
He got another attorney in his office to put his name on it, that's how illegal that filing is so deceptive and deceptive to the court that it's a crime in itself, perhaps. I mean, well, no, it is. Well, it violates it absolutely violates the legal ethics, and he's lying and he's absolutely lying about the cases and he's admitting key. I mean, it's terrible. It's everything that you're not supposed to do.
So it's a certainly a disbarment, like, the risk losing your law license for doing that and maybe go to prison if you're a prosecutor to do that kind of stuff. And he didn't have his own the guts to put his own name on it. He had a junior woman in his office Right? And he had some other junior prosecutor sign it. Hey.
Give me 5 minutes. And and, and then we get to the piece de resistance where they they had a recording that I think was secretly made, but they turned it over. But in the transcript, they had omitted this key discussion that occurred when Stephanie's guy stepped out of the room that I just told you about. He stepped out of the room and the special prosecutors were sitting there talking and it was all getting recorded. And in it, it's clear they got shit.
They know they got shit. They're just trying to wash these these people trying to fight for election integrity. They are forum shopping. They're admitting they don't have shit. They're trying to figure out what they can threaten this guy with in order to so this is what happens because they're about truth and not narrative.
Here's the problem. It's a lot easier to be about narrative and not truth, But eventually, truth happens. Eventually, reality happens. And for them to do what they're doing, they have to go farther and farther out on a branch, farther and farther out on a branch. You know, it reminds me of I saw when I was a student in England, I saw Chekhov play in London.
It was a social comedy and the Russians are masters of these 1 act social comedies. It's a little bit like Mr. Bean, if you've ever seen the English, comedian, mister Bean, that, you know, this one play was called The Sneeze. A Chekhov play, I remember, was called The Sneeze, and it's funny. It happened, anyway, and it's like a guy at a dinner party or something, and he goes to sneeze and he can't he doesn't have his handkerchief, so Last night, he grabs out of someone else's pocket and he sneezes on it, but he got signs really the lining to the guy's suit.
So I don't know. It's so he's gotta do something else to fix that, then he's gotta do something else to fix that. And it gets worse and worse and worse. And by the end, there's like a chandelier falling on a wedding cake or something or some it was very much like a Mr. Bean skit.
It just, you know, some and some little error at the beginning that some tries to cover up for. It just snowballs and snowballs until there's this ridiculous outcome. Similarly, because these Michigan attorney general and special prosecutors are violating the law. They're Dick O'Hann. Everything Stephanie did and the sheriffs did was absolutely within the square letter of the law.
There's nothing wrong with it at all. The providence of all those cases in Michigan I just told you, you know, the town clerks and the sheriffs, the town could have the right to say none of them should have turned over their they should have erased their hard drives and thumb drives. That was an unlawful order. Some of them did the right thing and said, hey. I'm gonna look into this myself.
They hired Stephanie. Some just turned whatever they had over to the sheriffs who hired Stephanie. And Stephanie hired some expert people like ex NSA type people and Ben Cotton and stuff to dig through it and and reverse engineer how the how the grift works which they have found in desperation, so I'm summarizing. So in desperation, the Michigan establishment has responded. The 2 Soros Goons have responded.
The attorney general couldn't get her own staff to bring any ridiculous case. And when they first tried to do, they first tried to she first tried to get this case away from the sheriff's, and Stephanie had to defend them and say, no. The sheriff's are by law, the and common law and statutory law, the first line of and the chief legal officer investigate this. The attorney general doesn't just get to say, well, I'm taking your case up to, into our hands, well, man, it's just no. What if they're corrupt?
The law is written this way for a reason. So at first, they tried that. When that when Stephanie beat them there, then they went after prosecuting Stephanie. But the attorney general's own office of 30 or 40 prosecutors, nobody would touch it. They know see this is not as pure political retaliation and they don't want to step into they're smart, they don't want to step into If they understand the big picture, this is all being done in furtherance of a coup, a soft coup.
And stepping into that fray, you're now abetting a coup. Well, finally the attorney general found another prosecutor, this guy Hilson who was dumb enough to step in who's got a pro an investigator, trooper who just got a dinged $14,500,000 in civil court, I hope they're gonna take it out of his monthly paycheck for fabricating evidence and being crooked and, putting somebody in prison who didn't belong there and fabricating evidence and lying on the stand. And then that special prosecutor has been playing games that are illegal like creating a parallel civil case that he can use to push his criminal case, having a judge who would accept that, which is a little odd itself. Stephanie doesn't talk about that with me, but, because she doesn't want to offend the judge, but that's, that's not, that's a that's very telling about the judge that he would allow that. That all violated the law that he would do it.
And in the course of responding to these complaints, he has miss cited law. He has lied. And in the filings that do that, he's got some junior woman decide to put her to write it and someone not junior to put the name on it so so so as not to blemish him. These and then lastly, we had to this last chapter where they are saying, where, where it turns out that they they recorded something. And they the special prosecutor recorded something in the act of recording.
They recorded beating up on one of Stephanie's investigators and making inappropriate threats because they don't have anything that they can say he did was illegal, but they're threatening with taking his law his, license to be a private investigator. Well, that's witness tampering. That's witness tampering. And then when he's out of the room, they're talking. They know their dick O'Hang.
They don't have anything, and they're trying they're trying to they're talking around. How do we Basically, they're saying, we got Bubkus here. What can we do? Oh, I don't know. Well, how about we do this, that?
How about we find, we'll take it outside these counties up north where it's all been and we'll all concerned, we'll take it to a southern county where we got a judge on our side, we can at Southern Michigan County where we can, we can make this all work. And shoot, I mean, things that are at the very least risking their borrower licenses, and at the most illegal acts. Well, at the most in the context we're now speaking. But if we take this to a bigger level and the context of what's going on in America in the last 3 years, I doesn't seem I've been saying for 3 years, this is a soft too, people used to look at me oddly but surely the elements of it are you have a IQ that's room temperature or above, you can see that what's what's going on. And in the context of that, what these lawyers are doing up in Michigan are is actually furthering a coup.
They're trying to suppress the investigation of election integrity, but in specific with regard to election, to an election in 2000 that was as is gonna transpire once we have a return to rule of law, it's gonna become clear as everything has surfaced surfaced, it was a coup which means the attorney in my view, the special prosecutor in Michigan and his staff who is taking part of this, First of all, they're not as smart as the attorney general staff who saw how radioactive this was and refused to help the attorney general doing this. But the special product prosecutor in his office, in my view, are not just violating civil rights and this kind of thing that you saw with a $14,000,000 fine and they're not just violating laws like you can't if you're a special if you're a prosecutor, you can't leak what you're doing with the grand jury, you can't tell the press we're about to indict somebody. You can't you can't do these things that they that they revealed on a on the secret recording that turns out that they're absolutely gaming the system and figuring out how to cheat and they they're giving instructions to leave that out of a transcript.
All of this is illegal. But it's certainly stuff that you lose your license for and it's really stuff that you should go to prison for if you're a prosecutor. But I would say beyond that, they're taking part and a any any lures on the staff who are doing this stuff, you're taking part in the furtherance of a coup. And I'm just gonna mention there are 3 men running for president Well, I think if any one of those 3 win are gonna be listening to me for advice at least in part. I mean, I don't want any job in Washington.
I swear to God, I don't want any job in Washington, but there are at least 3 people. And my belief is these the everybody involved in this, you may think it's cute. You may think it's law affair. In my book, you're committing a you're taking part in treason, and that's a capital offense. So I really want the prosecutors, the special prosecutor and the staff, and I know they watch this stuff because anywhere I talk to the I know that, in my view, you're committing you're taking part in a capital crime.
You're committing treason. You're furthering a scheme that is treason. And I there's at least 3 people running for president who listen to me about these things, or who will someday, and none of them are named Joe Biden. So if you wanna ignore what I'm saying, you're putting an awful lot of faith in the possibility that Joe Biden is going to continue being our president because there's 3 other people who wanna be president. Well, I think we're gonna see things more my way.
Okay? And in my view, you attorneys who are working for this clown, Hilson, the prosecuting attorney in Michigan, you're committing a capital crime. So you're gonna be hung for this is what I'm saying. If all if it all comes true and all comes to light like I and all the pieces fit together as I strongly respect they're being fed. I think that you're gonna end up swinging for this.
So, you know, I want total forgiveness across this country for everyone who can. But the the lawyers who are doing this stuff, the lawyers and the military officers who are taking part of this, I have a different feeling for. You're taking you're contributing you are taking part in a coup. This isn't cute law fair, this isn't something we're all gonna laugh about over Sherry at the faculty club. You're committing a capital crime by doing these things in my view.
And who knows, the next president may very well be somebody who listens to my opinion on such matters. Okay. Well, hope that wasn't too much law, but there we go. And That support what I'm talking about are attached to this video and to the one and to the joining listing which has a PDF and such. Thank you.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
https://cybernews.com/tech/ghostsec-satellite-hacking-interview/
GhostSec hackers target satellites to “change the world” | Cybernews
GhostSec made a successful campaign against a Russian GNSS satellite receiver, claiming it as an act of protest against Vladimir Putin.
cybernews.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/4625560/biggest-news-since-november-3-2020 I’m about to do my most important video. DOJ has indicted Smartmatic for rigging a Philippine election. I’m involved in the background and will explain it. Give me 30 minutes to look presentable. spread the word and read: https://cnn.com/2023/09/22/business/smartmatic-bribery-scheme-indictment/index.html
Biggest news since November 3, 2020
I’m going to do the most important video I’ve done yet. Let me get cleaned up and set up the broadcast. But the DOJ has just indicted Smartmatic for rigging an election in the Philippines. I’m deeply involved in the background of the situation and will be explaining it all momentarily. Give me 30 minutes to look presentable.
In the meantime, speak the word and read this:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/22/business/smartmatic-bribery-scheme-indictment/index.html
patrickbyrne.locals.com
Smartmatic implicated in alleged bribery scheme involving top Filipino election official | CNN Business
Smartmatic, the voting technology company suing Fox News and former President Donald Trump’s top allies over their false claims that its machines rigged the 2020 election, was implicated in an alleged bribery scheme involving the former top election official in the Philippines, according to court filings obtained by CNN.
cnn.com
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Non-Trump-supporting man from Wisconsin blows whistle on 100,000 Ballots.
Video Transcript AI Summary
An employee at the Milwaukee Street post office in Madison, Wisconsin claimed that 100,000 ballots were missing based on an order from the USPS chapter in Wisconsin and Illinois. However, the employee doubted this claim as only 7 or 8 ballots were found during a search at United Mailing Services. Another USPS employee revealed that they were instructed to backdate late-received ballots as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd. The speaker emphasized that they are not a supporter of either Trump or Biden, but they believe something is wrong and want action to ensure faith in the election process. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He explained to me that an order had come down from the Wisconsin, Illinois chapter of the USPS that 100,000 ballots were missing. He then told me that his post office, the one at Milwaukee Street in Madison, Wisconsin, had dispatched employees used to look for the missing ballots around 4 AM, November 4th. He said, and I quote, around 4 AM. And that only ballots, 7 or 8 ballots were found at United Mailing Services, my work. Based on my previous experience ballots inhabit of double checking for the ballots, I believe that to be a lie immediately.
The following day, November 5th twenty, I had a conversation with a different USPS employee whose name I also know, in which she the USPS employees were ordered to backdate ballots that were received too late to be lawfully counted. I asked this employee if I would be getting in trouble for those ballots the night before with my own boss, just kinda making sure that I was covered. Because at first, I I think perhaps I did miss ballots, but I couldn't have if they weren't on the card where they're supposed to be. The employee said, employee said, no. I wouldn't as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd.
And then she hesitated for a moment and for a moment and said that's why they had us do that, referring to USPS employees. I'm not a Trump supporter. I'm not Biden supporter. I voted for Joe Jordans in this election, and I voted libertarian in the Wisconsin governor governor's race in bounty eighteen, which was my 1st election that I could vote in. But I know that something wrong here, and I just wanna see that something gets done about it for our state and for the people of our state so that people can have faith in our bad elections, I think the American people and the people of Wisconsin have a right to battle, what happened?
And the bottom line of this is why was the USPS even looking for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls closed at 8 PM.
reSee.it AI Summary
A printing shop in Michigan prints ballots for several counties, including some that get diverted to New York. There, people fill in Biden without voting downballot. The same company prints for Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia. China sent counterfeit ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. A shredding company was given roughly 3000 pounds of ballots to shred, including unshredded ballots that do not match legitimate ones and a shipping receipt from the Chinese firm that printed the ballots. DOJ and DHS have been told to stand down.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
READ AND RETWEET AS THOUGH THE LIFE OF YOUR NATION DEPENDS ON IT. WHICH IT DOES. Citizens, I am going to add to the picture with more information. I am not going to let this pass while keeping information to myself. I am going to walk you through 2 narratives.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
A printing shop in Michigan prints ballots for Delaware County, Pennsylvania and as Lancashire County, Pennsylvania (this is normal). But along with the ballots it prints on contract and delivers to those counties, it prints some ballots that get diverted to Bethpage, New York.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
There, a boiler room of folks fill in "Biden" (often without even voting downballot). The ballots (which are forensically legitimate, given that they come from the same print shop as the good ballots, ) then get trucked into Pennsylvania and mailed. Hundreds of thousands.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
We have all of that documented. Texts, statements, affidavits, everything.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
We also know that this same ballot printing company (and other firms in the same family) also print for Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Narrative #2: China sent counterfeit ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. During the counting on election night, all but four people were shoved out of the counting operation on the grounds of a dangerous "water main break" (that turned out to be "a toilet overflowed").
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Last Wednesday, December 30, the Georgia Senate Judiciary voted to inspect those Fulton County voting operations. Hours later (as I have previously posted) an Enterprise vans pulled up and got filled up with voting materials.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
A shredding company in neighboring Cobb County, Georgia was on December 31 given roughly 3,000 pounds of ballots to shred. Authorities have come into possession of those materials.
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
A handful of papers stuck to the side of the shredding bin. They include some unshredded ballots (which 2 federally certified forensic examiners have affied do not match the legitimate ballots). ALSO, A SHIPPING RECEIPT FROM THE CHINESE FIRM THAT PRINTED THE BALLOTS! IN CHINESE!
@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne
Word is the DOJ and DHS have been told to stand down. That President Trump himself has had to call agents on the ground asking them to continue. If you think they should continue, retweet to let @TheJusticeDept know your feelings.