TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @PeterBernegger

Saved - March 23, 2026 at 5:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I outline how counties accepting Albert Sensors and CrowdStrike allegedly surrendered network topology, IP ranges (including dark space), and the contact details of every election security official to CIS/CISA as a condition for a “free” sensor. The MOA demanded nine data items, from diagrams to PII; the full EI-ISAC list was scrubbed from public view except in the Wayback archive. Why?

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

🚨Tweet #52 - Is your city or county on the list? Below are details what of cities and counties gave up when they accepted Albert Sensors and CrowdStrike. The Albert Sensor County Memorandum of Agreement, Section C, required every participating county to provide CIS prior to installation - and any time the information changed: ✦ Item 1: Current network diagrams for all portions of the network being monitored ✦ Item 2: In-band remote access via secure internet channel to manage the device ✦ Item 3: Outbound log transmission access via secure internet channel ✦ Item 4: Reasonable assistance to CIS to enable CSS delivery ✦ Item 5: Maintenance of all required hardware, virtual machines, or software - and enabling CIS access to same ✦ Item 6: Public AND Private IP address ranges - including server type, operating system, and configuration - plus all IP ranges and addresses not in use (DarkNet space) ✦ Item 7: Completed Pre-Installation Questionnaires (PIQs) - revised whenever anything changed ✦ Item 8: Accurate and up-to-date name, email, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all designated authorized Points of Contact with portal access ✦ Item 9: Name, email address, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all shipping, installation, and security points of contact -Every election official. -Every IT contact. -Every security point of contact. -Name. -Email. -Mobile number. -Pager number. All of it - handed to CIS/CISA as a contractual requirement just to receive a "free" security sensor. This is not just a network map. This is a complete personnel directory of every person with access to county election infrastructure. Now look at who signed up, sample screenshots below. The whole list here for you to look up your jurisdiction: CIS published the full EI-ISAC partner list publicly - but it has been scrubbed! But @GuySmith1713057 found it. The only place it survives is the Wayback Machine, archived January 22, 2022: web.archive.org/web/2022012221… Screenshots of the archived list follow, is your city or county on it? Hmmmm, I see Bexar County Texas. Thousands of cities and counties - all 50 states - contractually surrendered their -network topology, -their IP ranges including dark space, -their server configurations, -and the personal contact details of every election security official they employed. Why was the list scrubbed? ➡️➡️ Ban computers from our elections.

Saved - March 23, 2026 at 5:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe how the Albert Sensor County MOA required CIS access before installation, detailing items like current network diagrams, in-band and outbound access, maintenance, IP ranges (including dark space), PIQs, and full contact details for all election security officials. A public EI-ISAC list was scrubbed, but archived in 2022; thousands of jurisdictions may have surrendered network maps, IPs, configs, and personal contacts to CIS/CISA, reportedly to ban computers from elections.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

🚨Tweet #52 - Is your city or county on the list? Below are details what of cities and counties gave up when they accepted Albert Sensors and CrowdStrike. The Albert Sensor County Memorandum of Agreement, Section C, required every participating county to provide CIS prior to installation - and any time the information changed: ✦ Item 1: Current network diagrams for all portions of the network being monitored ✦ Item 2: In-band remote access via secure internet channel to manage the device ✦ Item 3: Outbound log transmission access via secure internet channel ✦ Item 4: Reasonable assistance to CIS to enable CSS delivery ✦ Item 5: Maintenance of all required hardware, virtual machines, or software - and enabling CIS access to same ✦ Item 6: Public AND Private IP address ranges - including server type, operating system, and configuration - plus all IP ranges and addresses not in use (DarkNet space) ✦ Item 7: Completed Pre-Installation Questionnaires (PIQs) - revised whenever anything changed ✦ Item 8: Accurate and up-to-date name, email, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all designated authorized Points of Contact with portal access ✦ Item 9: Name, email address, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all shipping, installation, and security points of contact -Every election official. -Every IT contact. -Every security point of contact. -Name. -Email. -Mobile number. -Pager number. All of it - handed to CIS/CISA as a contractual requirement just to receive a "free" security sensor. This is not just a network map. This is a complete personnel directory of every person with access to county election infrastructure. Now look at who signed up, sample screenshots below. The whole list here for you to look up your jurisdiction: CIS published the full EI-ISAC partner list publicly - but it has been scrubbed! But @GuySmith1713057 found it. The only place it survives is the Wayback Machine, archived January 22, 2022: web.archive.org/web/2022012221… Screenshots of the archived list follow, is your city or county on it? Hmmmm, I see Bexar County Texas. Thousands of cities and counties - all 50 states - contractually surrendered their -network topology, -their IP ranges including dark space, -their server configurations, -and the personal contact details of every election security official they employed. Why was the list scrubbed? ➡️➡️ Ban computers from our elections.

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 10:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Not disagreeing, but there’s a real reason Soros stays: he launders money for Congressmen and US Senators. Step 1: Congress approves expenditures; 2) the Treasury sends wires; 3) thousands of NGOs and others get funds, dispersing to offshore entities, including politicians whose wives or relatives work at NGOs; 4) money circulates; 5) it returns to the Congressmen and their buddies. It isn’t Soros’ money; it’s US taxpayers’ money printed from thin air. That’s why he isn’t touched.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Not disagreeing with what you published here, but there is a more, real reason why George Soros stays: Soros launders the money for Congressmen, US Senators. Step 1: Congress approves the money expenditures, 2) the US Treasury sends out wires/checks to pay, 3) thousands of NGO's (and other entities) get the money, disperse to other entities including offshore (including politicians whose wives or relatives are getting big salaries at NGOs), 4) money floats around, 5) gets back to the Congressmen, US Senators and their buddies. It is NOT Soros' money, it is the US taxpayers (and what they print out of thin air) money. That is why George Soros is not touched. @DataRepublican

Saved - August 11, 2025 at 2:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Outagamie County, Wisconsin, has reportedly modified its election system unlawfully by contracting with CrowdStrike, which allows for real-time monitoring and data transmission to external servers. The CrowdStrike Falcon platform collects extensive telemetry data, including user logins and system commands, and can autonomously respond to perceived threats. This integration was not certified by the Wisconsin Election Commission, raising legal concerns about election security and compliance. Additionally, the system's connection to the internet has been confirmed by former county officials.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

🚨Breaking: County Election System Secretly Modified Without State Approval - Private Software Sends Live Data to Outside Servers Fun fact at the end. Outagamie County, Wisconsin uses an ES&S voting system. They entered into an unlawful contract with Crowdstrike (and Falcon) - yes the same Crowdstrike who did up Hillary Clinton's closet servers to commit crimes, then hid those servers from the FBI. The same Crowdstrike directly tied in with the DNC email hack. 1) CrowdStrike Terms and Conditions confirms they provide Falcon EPP (Endpoint Protection Platform) to the County encompassing: a. automated detection, language on p.62 Falcon EPP includes automated threat detection and response features, meaning it scans the EMS in real-time and acts when it detects suspicious behavior. b. This makes the software actively interfere with the EMS system and is not just a passive logger-it has the ability to make decisions automatically c. telemetry collection (process of recording and transmitting the readings of an instrument) d. threat response functions (p. 62) 2) The “Falcon Platform” logs and analyzes: -Execution scripts -Network telemetry -File system and process activity -Commands and binary usagee -Logins, URLs, MAC addresses (p. 62–63) 3) Customer data and machine-generated logs are uploaded to CrowdStrike’s servers and retained (pp. 59–60, 64–67). 4) The agreement disclaims any warranty of accuracy or uninterrupted service, and CrowdStrike is not liable for breaches, tampering, or surveillance consequences (pp. 36–39). 5) CrowdStrike/Falcon is not certified by WEC, nor mentioned in any certification memo, and its software was not tested as part of any EMS system. 6) I verified ties between: CrowdStrike, CIS, CISA, and Falcon EPP Entity. 7) Contracting Intermediary is theCenter for Internet Security ("CIS") who also is part of the Falcon contract for counties. 8) The tool being deployed logs and responds to EMS server activity; integrates with CrowdStrike telemetry servers. 9) Legal Implications: No WEC rulemaking under Ch. 227 administrative rule making for any of these products. 10) No mention of Falcon/CrowdStrike in ES&S certification applications. 11) EMS is altered by endpoint telemetry and possible auto-response software, none of this is certified. Page: 62–63 of the agreement language: a. The Falcon Platform “collects telemetry data” of: -User logins -Process execution -File access -Commands executed -Network behavior -Binary usage and MAC addresses b. Telemetry Collection found on Page 62: “CrowdStrike’s Products are designed to detect, prevent, respond to, and identify intrusions by collecting and analyzing data, including machine event data, executed scripts, code, system files, log files, dll files, login data, binary files, tasks, resource information, commands, protocol identifiers, URLs, network data, and/or other executable code and metadata.” This describes telemetry collection - the process of gathering system activity logs from the EMS. 12) Execution Profile / Metric Data is defined on Page 58–59 Quoted Language: “Execution Profile/Metric Data” means any machine-generated data, such as metadata derived from tasks, file execution, commands, resources, network telemetry, executable binary files, macros, scripts, and processes... that is collected during the course of CrowdStrike providing Offerings." 13) So Outagamie County deployed an unlawful remote-access tool that can: a. Transmit logs to third-party servers, b. Initiate quarantine or shutdown actions, c. Insert software agents not evaluated under § 5.91(10) 14) This software watches everything the EMS does, like: a. What programs are running b. Who’s logging in c. What files are changing d. What commands are being typed e. It sends all that information to CrowdStrike’s servers somewhere else 15) Even more, this watchdog can sometimes take action on its own, such as: a. Locking files b. Shutting things down c. Quarantining (freezing) parts of the system d. Stopping things it thinks are threats 16) Meaning: The EMS is no longer the same system that Wis. Election Commission approved, because another piece of software was added that:  a. Watches everything the EMS does b. Sends private info to an outside company, companies c. Can take control of parts of the system without anyone at WEC knowing d. CrowdStrike/Falcon is actively monitoring everything happening on the EMS computer and sending those logs to its servers 17) All huge, because the law says the voting system has to be safe, secure, and fully approved before it’s used. Wis. Stats 5.91(10) "It is suitably designed for the purpose used, of durable construction, and is usable safely, securely, efficiently and accurately in the conduct of elections and counting of ballots." 18) And took a look at Wis. Stats. 5.905 about software requirements. And federal HAVA, and NIST 800-53, and FISMA (critical infrastructure), and the National Defense Authorization Act Section 889. 19) Thus the CrowdStrike Falcon: a. Collects telemetry from EMS machines including login activity, command execution, and network behavior, b. Uploads it to CrowdStrike servers, and c. Does this automatically, outside the Wis. Election Commission’s oversight or certification. d. These features were never disclosed in ES&S certification paperwork, not reviewed by WEC under Wis. Stat. § 5.91(10), and never approved via Chapter 227 administrative rulemaking. 20) Execution Profile / Metric Data is defined on page 58–59 (Exhibit A: Data Security and Privacy Schedule) Quoted Language: “Execution Profile/Metric Data” means any machine-generated data, such as metadata derived from tasks, file execution, commands, resources, network telemetry, executable binary files, macros, scripts, and processes... that is collected during the course of CrowdStrike providing Offerings." This confirms that network telemetry and command logs are routinely collected from the "protected" ES&S EMS voting system. 21) Endpoint Services Agreement (attached via link here for you to read yourself) Telemetry Collection / Logging Confirmed on Page 1–3 a. CrowdStrike Falcon is described as continuously monitoring EMS systems, collecting logs, and providing SOC visibility. b. The contract explicitly states it captures logs and events from covered endpoints. c. Implication: This confirms that Outagamie County installed remote logging and telemetry software onto its EMS system without WEC approval. 22) 2. Remote Upload to Third-Party Servers is confirmed on page 3 a. All event data collected by Falcon is transmitted to CrowdStrike-controlled cloud infrastructure. b. This includes EMS system logs, login events, network access patterns, and threat detection logs. c. Implication: Election logs are being uploaded to private third-party servers - breaking chain of custody, violating certification boundaries, and never disclosed in ES&S application materials seeking original cert. 23) Autonomous System Actions (Auto-Response / Quarantine) is confirmed on pages 3–4 a. CrowdStrike has the ability to quarantine, delete, or isolate EMS files based on automated threat detection rules. b. Implication: The EMS system may be interrupted or modified without operator input - a material system change that WEC never reviewed or certified under § 5.91(10) (neither agreement has any WEC certification to it) 24) Fun fact: ES&S voting systems company out of Omaha Nebraska sold their system/machines to Outagamie County with certification stickers on them. The EAC forced ES&S to tell the county (and other counties) to remove those certification stickers! 25) Outagamie County's ES&S voting system connects to the internet, per the sworn depositions of former County Clerk Jeff King, current County Clerk Kelly Gerritas and Verizon employee Jill Mangless. 26) I believe the Falcon Endpoint Services platform is the software version of an Albert Sensor. The Feds are spying on our counties, on our elections. Election fraud is via Sovereign Fraud, as I've said for ~4 years now. Link to the Falcon Endpoint Services Agreement: https://limewire.com/d/ciOuI#arWpMMqPae A whole other story: Crowdstrike is tied to Ukrainian elections. @GuySmith1713057 @DrazhaS @realMikeLindell @CannConActual @AsheinAmerica @weible_rick @hotgovernment1 @RonJohnsonWI @RealAlexJones @realJoeHoft @Real_RobN @EmeraldRobinson @VickiMcKenna @ProjectVirginia @amuse @honestpollster @DefiyantlyFree

Content not found | LimeWire Content not found on LimeWire limewire.com
Saved - April 4, 2025 at 12:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I analyzed the 2025 WI Supreme Court election results, where Republican Brad Schimel received 1,063,244 votes but lost by 10 points. In contrast, Democrat Janet Protasiewicz won in 2023 with 1,021,370 votes, also by 10 points. I noticed patterns suggesting absentee ballots were being strategically used to keep liberal Susan Crawford ahead, almost like an algorithm was involved. Seth Keshel pointed out that Schimel's vote total was historically high for a Republican, indicating that turnout isn't the issue; rather, Democrats have effectively mastered ballot harvesting.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

2025 WI Supreme Court election - Republican Brad Schimel 1,063,244 votes he lost, by 10% points 2023 Democrat Janet Protasiewicz 1,021,370 votes she won, by 10% points, 2 years ago. The data I'm looking at is showing absentee ballots being fed into the system to keep liberal Susan Crawford ahead at a certain rate. ... almost as if an algorithm was at work. The graph below tells a story. From @RealSKeshel thank you! His comments: "Brad Schimel's 1.063mm votes last night was higher than any Democrat vote total in the history of any WI Supreme Court race. He lost by 10. Turnout ain't the issue, folks. Dems have mastered ballot harvesting over a lengthy early voting period and can figure out with basic math where their opponent is likely to wind up in order to get over the top. The country can't survive with mail-in voting." Seth Keshel. @RegJoeShow @RealAlexJones @EmeraldRobinson @drawandstrike @BrianSchimming @BradSchimel @TeamSchimel @RonJohnsonWI

Saved - April 3, 2025 at 1:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Liberal Susan Crawford lost the election, but I believe she engaged in election fraud. In comparing the 2023 and 2024 WI state supreme court race results, the voter turnout increased significantly while percentages remained nearly identical, suggesting manipulation. Despite 62.7% supporting a voter ID referendum, Crawford, who opposes the law, "won" with low national approval for Democrats. I allege she committed smurfing, a form of money laundering, and have filed complaints with the FBI and state ethics commissions, calling for prosecution of those involved.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Liberal Susan Crawford did not win the election last night. See how she committed election fraud at the end of this tweet. 2023 WI state supreme court race Brown County (Green Bay) results on the right. ~77,000 voted. Note the percentages. 2024 WI state supreme court race Brown County results on the left. ~100,000 voted. Virtually the same percentages. ...almost like an algorithm is running. 62.7% voted for the referendum requiring voter ID to be in the state constitution. Yet liberal Susan Crawford "won" with Democrat politicians only having 21% approval rating nationally. And Crawford outright stated that she would repeal the existing statutory voter ID law passed in 2015. Liberal Susan Crawford committed massive Smurfing, i.e. criminal money laundering. A 45-page criminal complaint was filed before the election to the FBI. In addition, Patriot Jay Stone filed a 10 page complaint to the Wis. ETHICS Commission. And Patriot Julie Seegers filed a Judicial Complaint to the Wis Judicial Commission. Smurfing is a scourge on our elections across the country. Liberal Crawford and her co-conspirators laundered millions into her campaign. This is election fraud. She, Ben Wikler, Actblue, the Wis Democratic Party and the others involved must be prosecuted. More on the election yesterday in my tweets below - @DrazhaS @FSociety_1942 @realJoeHoft @joeoltmannX @EmeraldRobinson @RegJoeShow @FBIDDBongino @FBIDirectorKash @AGPamBondi @POTUS @elonmusk @PatrickByrne @hotgovernment1

Saved - March 25, 2025 at 8:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that there are 95 district attorneys influenced by George Soros, not just 70. I shared an email from Fair and Just Prosecution's Miriam Aroni Krinsky, highlighting their efforts to protect reproductive rights post-Dobbs decision. FJP is using federal and local tax dollars to guide these prosecutors, which raises concerns about legality and ethics. I compiled a list of these prosecutors and encourage others to request public records related to their affiliations with FJP. This situation appears to involve significant misconduct.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

2/ George Soros in Oshkosh Wisconsin and another surprise ending. There are not 70 district attorneys being controlled by George Soros and using federal taxpayers' monies.....there are 95! I found them and began creating a list, it is below. Look at this email from Fair and Just Prosecution non-profit Director Miriam Aroni Krinsky (in image below also) to all 90 (at the time) prosecutors: "All: Thanks to the many of you who brought your voices to the joint statement FJP issued last month with over 90 elected prosecutors pledging to use their settled discretion and not criminalize personal healthcare decisions. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ending the long established, relied upon, and federally protected constitutional right to abortion, we know that many of you have stepped forward as leaders in your communities to protect reproductive rights and preserve access to abortion care. And we know that many elected prosecutors are working alongside, and in collaboration with, communities, advocates, and other elected leaders across the health and legal systems in these efforts. To support the developing work in this space and help facilitate the sharing of ideas and resources, FJP is aiming to gather information on actions being taken by elected prosecutors to protect reproductive rights, avoid criminalizing personal medical decisions, and proactively support access to necessary care and justice for all. Those actions might include (among others): joining lawsuits or briefs challenging the validity of state abortion restrictions, publishing “know your rights” materials or other resources for people seeking reproductive care, joining efforts to protect access to reproductive health care, addressing concerns about data privacy, or developing inter-agency policies protecting medical care and reproductive health in the face of restrictive laws. If you have any efforts or news that you, your office, or other leaders in your jurisdiction are researching, contemplating and planning – or any statements, policies, activities, engagement with other local leaders, or other actions you have already put in place – please let us know. You can send them on to me as well as Kalyn Hill at khill@fairandjustprosecution.org and Rebecca Blair at rblair@fairnadjustprosecution.org. We are aiming over the coming weeks to put together information and resources, including thoughts on how prosecutors can continue to engage to promote and protect reproductive rights and we welcome all of your ideas. Given the timeliness and fast-moving nature of this issue, if at all possible please pass on any responsive information on or before next Monday, August 1. As always, if you have any questions or if there is any way FJP can provide further support, please do not hesitate to reach out. Sincerely, Miriam & the FJP Team Miriam Aroni Krinsky Founder and Executive Director Fair and Just Prosecution Email: krinskym@krinsky.la Cell: (818) 416 5218" Notice Krinsky is not using an FJP email address. FJP is using federal tax dollars, from the Tides Center, to control these county prosecutors. And you'll see in future tweets the tremendous amount of time these prosecutors are spending on/with FJP - all the while being on the clock and paid by local taxpayers. FJP is using federal tax dollars, and local tax dollars also as all these county district attorneys are getting a paycheck, to control these local prosecutors. Getting them to sign pledges not to enforce laws passed by state legislatures! This all smacks of racketeering, defrauding the US Government, conspiring to defraud the US Govt., collusion and a host of other felony crimes. Alphabetical List of Prosecutors I'm including former and current known ones. This list is not complete, it will grow due to newly elected county prosecutors. Patriots: get public records requests out to these offices. Ask for emails, texts, pledges, agreements, any record with FJP (Fair and Just Prosecution) on it. Remember to put a time limit on it, such as the past 2 or 3 years for example. Call your local county supervisor, pass all this info onto them. Alabama Danny Carr - District Attorney, Jefferson County Arizona Laura Conover - County Attorney, Pima County California Michael Atwell - District Attorney, Alpine County Diana Becton - District Attorney, Contra Costa County George Gascón - District Attorney, Los Angeles County Nancy O’Malley - District Attorney, Alameda County Jill Ravitch - District Attorney, Sonoma County Jeff Rosen - District Attorney, Santa Clara County Colorado Michael Dougherty - District Attorney, 20th Judicial District (Boulder) Gordon McLaughlin - District Attorney, 8th Judicial District Beth McCann - District Attorney, 2nd Judicial District (Denver) Brian Mason - District Attorney, 17th Judicial District Alonzo Payne - District Attorney, 12th Judicial District Delaware Kathleen Jennings - Attorney General District of Columbia Karl Racine - Attorney General Florida Andrew Warren - State Attorney, 13th Judicial Circuit (Tampa) Georgia Patsy Austin-Gatson - District Attorney, Gwinnett Judicial Circuit Sherry Boston - District Attorney, DeKalb County David Cooke - District Attorney, Macon Judicial Circuit Deborah Gonzalez - District Attorney, Western Judicial Circuit (Athens) Dalia Racine - District Attorney, Douglas County Jared Williams - District Attorney, Augusta Judicial Circuit Hawaii Rebecca Like - Prosecuting Attorney, County of Kaua’i Illinois Kimberly M. Foxx - State’s Attorney, Cook County (Chicago) Jamie Mosser - State’s Attorney, Kane County Eric Rinehart - State’s Attorney, Lake County (Waukegan) Dora A. Villarreal - State’s Attorney, Rock Island County Indiana Ryan Mears - Prosecuting Attorney, Marion County (Indianapolis) Kansas Suzanne Valdez - District Attorney, Douglas County (Lawrence) Louisiana Jason Williams - District Attorney, Orleans Parish Maine Natasha Irving - District Attorney, 6th Prosecutorial District Maryland Aisha Braveboy - State’s Attorney, Prince George’s County Marilyn J. Mosby - State’s Attorney, Baltimore City Massachusetts Rob Galibois - District Attorney, Cape and Islands Andrea Harrington - District Attorney, Berkshire County Marian Ryan - District Attorney, Middlesex County David Sullivan - District Attorney, Northwestern District Michael W. Morrissey - District Attorney, Norfolk County Michigan Dana Nessel - Attorney General Karen McDonald - Prosecuting Attorney, Oakland County Eli Savit - Prosecuting Attorney, Washtenaw County (Ann Arbor) Carol Siemon - Prosecuting Attorney, Ingham County (Lansing) Matthew J. Wiese - Prosecuting Attorney, Marquette County Minnesota Keith Ellison - Attorney General John Choi - County Attorney, Ramsey County Mary Moriarty - County Attorney, Hennepin County Mississippi Shameca Collins - District Attorney, 6th Judicial District Jody Owens - District Attorney, Hinds County Missouri Wesley Bell - Prosecuting Attorney, St. Louis County New Mexico Mary Carmack-Altwies - District Attorney, 1st Judicial District Raúl Torrez - District Attorney, Bernalillo County (Albuquerque) New York Alvin Bragg - District Attorney, New York County (Manhattan) Dave Clegg - District Attorney, Ulster County Eric Gonzalez - District Attorney, Kings County (Brooklyn) Mimi Rocah - District Attorney, Westchester County Matthew Van Houten - District Attorney, Tompkins County (Ithaca) North Carolina Satana Deberry - District Attorney, Durham County Todd Williams - District Attorney, Buncombe County (Asheville) Ohio Zach Klein - City Attorney, Columbus Michael O’Malley - County Prosecutor, Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Oregon Matt Ellis - District Attorney, Wasco County John Hummel - District Attorney, Deschutes County Mike Schmidt - District Attorney, Multnomah County (Portland) Pennsylvania Lawrence S. Krasner - District Attorney, Philadelphia Jack Stollsteimer - District Attorney, Delaware County Texas John Creuzot - District Attorney, Dallas County José Garza - District Attorney, Travis County (Austin) Brian Middleton - District Attorney, Fort Bend County Joe Gonzales - District Attorney, Bexar County (San Antonio) Mark Gonzalez - District Attorney, Nueces County (Corpus Christi) Vermont Sarah F. George - State’s Attorney, Chittenden County (Burlington) Joshua R. Diamond - Acting Attorney General Virginia Buta Biberaj - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Loudoun County Parisa Dehghani-Tafti - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Arlington County and the City of Falls Church Steve Descano - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Fairfax County Jim Hingeley - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Albemarle County Ramin Fatehi - Commonwealth’s Attorney, City of Norfolk Colette McEachin - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Richmond Stephanie Morales - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Portsmouth Bryan Porter - Commonwealth’s Attorney, City of Alexandria Shannon Taylor - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Henrico County Washington Ann Davison - City Attorney, Seattle Dan Satterberg - Prosecuting Attorney, King County Wisconsin John T. Chisholm - District Attorney, Milwaukee County Eric D. Sparr - District Attorney, Winnebago County Northern Mariana Islands Edward E. Manibusan - Attorney General Miriam Aroni Krinsky in effect is working for George Soros, the guy who admitted on 60 Minutes he pointed out Jews to the Nazi's - where those Jews were then gassed to death in the concentration camps. Ms. Krinsky is Jewish. Many on FJP's staff are Jewish also. What sick people they are. @fjp_org @SidneyPowell1 @RonJohnsonWI @SenRonJohnson @WisGOP @WinnebagoGOP @wioshkosh @WCSO_Wisconsin (Sheriff how about an investigation?) @WaukeshaGOP @Rasmussen_Poll @BehizyTweets @EmeraldRobinson @nataliegwinters @JamesOKeefeIII @GrothmanforWI @RepTonyWied @RCGforSenate @realDonaldTrump @PamBondi @Kash_Patel @DanScavino @KenPaxtonTX @LAGovJeffLandry @elonmusk @Article3Project @mrddmia @julie_kelly2 @TheLastRefuge2 @CannConActual @AsheinAmerica @ConradsonJordan

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 7:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
State and local governments have been manipulating finances by using property tax revenue to issue unsustainable bonds, turning essential funding into a risky scheme. This has led to inflated property values, corruption in school boards, and mismanaged pensions, creating a financial crisis. The result is a heavy burden on taxpayers, with rising property taxes, pension fund insolvencies, and the threat of mass foreclosures looming. The situation is dire, with government officials making decisions behind closed doors that exacerbate the problem.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

The Hidden Debt Crisis: How Local Governments, School Boards, and Pensions Are Trapping Taxpayers in an Endless Cycle of Fraud Article by : Leah Hoopes "For years, state and local governments have engaged in massive financial manipulation, leveraging property tax revenue to issue bonds at an unsustainable rate. What was once a mechanism for funding essential services has become a high-stakes Ponzi scheme, where inflated property values, school board corruption, and pension mismanagement have created a financial time bomb waiting to explode." "At the heart of this crisis are leveraged bonds, school districts operating as slush funds, and a taxpayer base being squeezed dry to cover mounting debts that government officials created behind closed doors. The consequences are catastrophic—ballooning property taxes, pension fund insolvencies, and the looming threat of mass foreclosures." See also my tweet pinned up right now about this. @PeterBernegger @hoopes_leah @thepeoplesaudit @_Matt_Hammod_ @PekalaLaw @GailGolec @EmeraldRobinson @RealAlexJones @waltduro @BuenoForMiami

@hoopes_leah - Leah Hoopes

RED ALERT! THE PENSION FUND CRISIS https://intelligencer.today/red-alert-the-pension-fund-crisis/19/03/2025/9157/ This should be the breaking news today!! We are in serious trouble America!

RED ALERT! THE PENSION FUND CRISIS - Intelligencer Article by : Leah Hoopes intelligencer.today
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 10:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've uncovered a troubling network of organizations involved in Smurfing, with over 300 entities needing to be shut down. Democracy Engine, co-founded by Jonathan Zucker, is poised to replace ActBlue. MoveOn.org has partnered with The Action Network, raising concerns about money laundering. Several fintechs and banks, including PayPal and Wells Fargo, are colluding to facilitate Smurfing. Ellen Weintraub, an FEC Commissioner since 2002, has been complicit in covering up election fraud. High-profile figures and law firms, including Marc Elias and Perkins Coie, are also implicated in this scheme.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

@actblue and @winred is just the tip of Smurfing. See how deep it goes right here: there are over 300 other organizations committing Smurfing and they all need to be shutdown. Democracy Engine positioned itself to take over the role of Actblue. Co-founder of Actblue: Jonathan Zucker. Co-founder of Democracy Engine: Jonathan Zucker. MoveOn dot org as of Dec 2024 has partnered with The Action Network. Lots of money being laundering by them. The Fintechs colluding/conspiring with ActBlue, WinRed and the others to make Smuring happen: PayPal, STRIPE, Bills dot com (Divvy Card division), Gift-O-Gram and more! We have the evidence. Banks colluding/conspiring with Actblue, WinRed and the others to make Smurfing happen: Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Amalgamated Bank Washington DC branch. We have the evidence. Dirty penny in the pile: Ellen Weintraub. A very corrupt person participating in criminally laundering money, and stealing the identities of elderly senior citizens. Weintraub has know for YEARS Smurfing has been occuring. She has been a Commissioner with the FEC since 2002. She used to work for Perkins Coie law firm. She has written letters - on FEC letterhead - denying there is election fraud in our elections. She in fact is covering it up! Smurfing is one method of election fraud. This is why just this past month the DFC, the DNC and the DCCC all rushed to her defense when President Trump fired her (she is fighting it). She has been covering for these corrupt committees - who also are colluding in Smurfing. Soros' groups are intertwined in these. As was Pierre Omidyar. Fact: when we came out publicly in 2022-2023 about Smurfing Pierre bolted. He fled from the Smurfing scene! And Attorney Marc Elias is in on this Smurfing big time, as is Perkins Coie law firm. @PerkinsCoieLLP You can't setup up organizations to criminally launder billions without attorneys. THEY were/are the attorneys. Remember the GodFather had an attorney? So do the drug cartels. @elonmusk @immutablechrist @TheTVConsPiracy

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 2:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I need to clarify the extent of the Smurfing happening in political campaigns. Georgia's Senator Ossoff allegedly laundered over $13 million into his campaigns. Similarly, Senator Baldwin is reported to have laundered $29 million across six campaigns, while Senator Sherrod Brown exceeds $31 million. I plan to expose more senators, including Ted Cruz. Much of this funding comes from taxpayer money, China, and wealthy individuals like Reid Hoffman and Hansjorg Wyss. There are ongoing criminal investigations into ActBlue and similar organizations.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

I have to be clearer as to how big this Smurfing is, Georgia @SenOssoff @ossoff criminally laundered $13,791,015 into his campaign(s). When I wrote this was just the tip of the iceberg in a tweet about him below I meant it. Example no. 2: @SenatorBaldwin laundered $29 million over the years into her six different campaign platforms. US Senator @SenSherrodBrown well over $31 million! See @LindseyGrahamSC exposure along with other US Senators such as @RaphaelWarnock in my tweets below. We will be exposing US @SenTedCruz along with many, many more. Much of it is YOUR money. From the US Treasury, and also China, and also some billionaires such as the very corrupt @reidhoffman and Hansjorg Wyss. See first one @TomCottonAR @SenTomCotton just scroll down in my tweets. ActBlue, WinRed and and hundreds of others like them need to be shut down! 20 State Attorney Generals opened criminal investigations into ActBlue last year, ongoing.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

US Senator @SenOssoff caught Smurfing 🚨🚨🚨 See pie image here, which is a quick data run on his campaign and doesn't show all of the laundering. The top 20 Smurfs (victims who are having their names and addresses used in this Smurfing without their knowledge) made at a min. 197,223 contributions to Ossoff's campaign. Just via ActBlue!! Chris Gleason @immutablechrist Phillip Allison @TheTVConsPiracy , myself and others are exposing politicians who are criminally laundering money into their campaigns - we have been for years. 20 State Attorney Generals last year opened a criminal investigation into ActBlue, its still ongoing. We are running all 100 US Senators, @SenTomCotton is exposed in below tweets as he is also Smurfing. Sources: FEC database, and/or state equivalent database if relevant to the campaign we're investigating. Again, you're just seeing the tip of the iceberg with this Senator! Articles on Smurfing at electionwatch dot info website.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Announcement: we will be running Smurfing data for each of the 100 US Senators. @TomCottonAR done! These will be the "quick" runs which will show, if any, Smurfing by these Senators. Note these will not be full blown data runs, as doing just one is a big job. The pie charts… https://t.co/0Bmp7qi0Qy

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered internal emails revealing Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul's coordination with outside groups and media regarding the 2020 election. The emails, linked to the Progressive State Leaders Organization, show leftist attorneys influencing our state AG's actions. Notably, Norm Eisen is involved in promoting vote-by-mail and changing election laws. I suspect there may be a whistleblower in Kaul's office, and I plan to expose more liberal AGs involved in this scheme. Stay tuned for more details and names.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

BREAKING 🚩🚩 Internal emails show the Attorney General of Wisconsin, Josh Kaul, coordinating with the deep state and media in stealing the 2020 election. Look at the names of their internal email posted here. From the Progressive State Leaders Organization. And "Re: election litigation group: contact (50.19 kB)" Look at the date of the email. I have earlier ones also and will be publishing them. Outside leftist attorneys and non-profits telling our State Attorney General what to do. The very corrupt Norm Eisen works with this organization promoting such things as vote by mail, drop boxes and changing (read rigging) election laws to make it easier to cheat! And they got their monies from the US Treasury - follow the NGO's! Is there a whistleblower in Josh Kaul's office? Shown here is an exclusive photo of Josh Kaul in his home getting ready to spread propaganda. Guess what: there are numerous liberal state AG's exposed in the 151 emails. More to come on that where I'm naming names in this story! Is this bribery?? @DanODonnellShow @VickiMcKenna @bennyjohnson @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @SidneyPowell1 @RealAlexJones @EmeraldRobinson @BradSchimel

Saved - January 28, 2025 at 3:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Liberal NGOs have become a significant force, effectively acting as a fifth branch of government. I've compiled extensive information, including videos, revealing the connections between these organizations and major funders like Charles Schwab and Vanguard. With around 55,000 NGOs mapped out, they are using taxpayer money to influence our institutions, promoting agendas like transgenderism and climate change. It's concerning to see former Biden officials moving into these NGOs. I believe all funding should be cut off immediately. I can provide detailed information on these organizations and their connections.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Liberal NGO's have become the fifth branch of government. We have tons of information, data, and videos we made on the fraudulent NGOs of the left. View one at the link here, you'll be shocked who is in it from Charles Schwab to VanGuard to Fidelity to the Silicon Valley Foundation to the Chinese Progressive Association to the Tides Foundation to the 1630 Fund and a host of other NGO's being funded by you, the taxpayer: https://thefractalgovernment.com/?p=365 There are roughly 55,000 of them, mapped out in the image here. They have become the fifth branch of government. These corrupt liberal NGO's are using federal taxpayers' monies to interfere with our institutions and country. To interfere at all levels, to promote the phony crap such as transgenderism, climate change, DEI, the Covid vaccine scam and so forth and so on. Now, we can see the Biden leftovers are moving into these NGO's—funded by the US Treasury—to continue to do their dirty work. President Trump: all funding needs to be cut off now. We can supply the names/addresses of all of them, and how they are connected to each other. @POTUS @elonmusk @EmeraldRobinson @nataliegwinters @catturd2 @drawandstrike @AsheinAmerica @BlehmLawAZ @BryanSteil @SenRonJohnson @AmericaOme17300

Saved - January 16, 2025 at 4:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the 2020 Election in Dallas County was compromised through the collaboration of Verizon, Cradlepoint, and CTSmobility. They replaced traditional precincts with 468 "Pop Up" Vote Centers, using Verizon's LTE network and Cradlepoint routers to connect polling data securely. Concerns arose about potential unauthorized access via Cradlepoint's NetCloud. Additionally, the routers, manufactured in China, raised questions about security, especially given Cradlepoint's ownership by Ericsson. There are claims that this setup allowed manipulation of vote counts.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

How Verizon and Cradlepoint stole the 2020 Election in Dallas County Texas: -The theft of the 2020 Election in Dallas was accomplished by Verizon, Cradlepoint, and CTSmobility. -All Dallas Precincts were replaced with 468 "Pop Up" Vote Centers that covered the 873 sq miles of Dallas County -The Vote Centers were networked with Verizon's standard cellular LTE in the 3.5GHz band (48 channels) -Cradlepoint provided the endpoint router (likely IBR600C or equivalent) at each of the Vote Centers -The routers communicated with the ES&S Pollbooks using the logical "security" of Cradlepoint's NetCloud -Additional "security" came from the Quality of Service capabilities of LTE and Verizon's Private APN Network -The most likely explanation for this is that Bad actors (whether County, State, Federal or Foreign) somehow gained access through the NetCloud portal at the Dallas County Vote Center https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/11689/410268 9:50 Lester: Security? 3 parts of the voting system: 1) voter registration 2) vote casting 3) vote tally. So the biggest thing is to make sure those that all of those parts were secure & they are taking advantage of some of the features of the Cradlepoint devices. 10:53 Lester on: Remote Signal Strength measurement at the County Level 15:30 Lester 468 Vote Center sites in Dallas 18:55 Devang: Dallas had some experience with Cradlepoint and so they deployed an all in one Cradlepoint router powered by NetCloud which is a centralized management suite that enabled them to connect several E-Pollbooks and securely send polling data to a data center over Verizon's Private Network. Verizon got involved through Cradlepoint's partner http://CTSmobility.com [who connected Verizon to Dallas County and who also provided the Cradlepoint routers to Dallas] 27:03 Gregory: Dallas County upgraded their modems so that they could have that real-time voter count & voting results sent back to the data centers It was the CIA, DIS, DIA and their buddies. Cradlepoint routers are manfactured in China, in a plant about an hour outside Beijing. Then shipped to Tawain, repackaged, then shipped Cradlepoint in Boise, Idaho. Cradlepoint is owned by Erriccson - a known, corrupt Swedish company. They paid the ISIS to kill our soldiers. As Michael Rae Khoury @Vltra_MK has been exposing, one key smoking gun is the Joffe US Patent, it matches real world voting communication systems we now have, but the public was never told about. Image here. @GuySmith1713057 @FSociety_1942 They learn the vote counts, then know how many ballots to feed in late in the night or following days.

Network Planning to Help Secure Elections The COVID-19 pandemic has swept across the U.S. generating unprecedented disruption of the election cycles. Amid forced closures and social distancing p... brighttalk.com
Managed Services | CTS Mobility CTS Mobility is the best B2B Support Provider For Corporate Companies in United States. Contact now for any requirements related to Apple products & others ctsmobility.com
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 6:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see it happening! Speaker of the Assembly Rep Robin Vos is linked to communist China and Hunter Biden's emails. China owns significant farmland in Wisconsin and across the U.S. Vos blocked a bill that would have stopped this from coming to a vote in Madison.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Look its already happening! Speaker of the Assembly Rep Robin Vos connected to communist China, tied in with Hunter Biden emails (see retweet at bottom here). China owns farmland in Wisconsin, and loads of it across the USA. Vos prevented a bill coming to a floor vote in Madison which would have stopped China....see details in retweet here.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

WYOMING Sec. of State accuses Wisconsin State Assembly Speaker Robin Vos of being a communist China CCP asset. Hunter Biden emails tie "republican" Robin Vos to communist China, detailed in new 10-page pamphlet coming out this week. See image. Robin Vos and his minions, like Assembly Reps Kevin Petersen, August Tyler, Shae Sortwell, Scott Krug blocked a bill from having a floor vote that would have banned China from buying Wisconsin farmland and timberland. How to get rid of tyrant Robin Vos: Kelly Clark is running for State Assembly District Rep for the 33rd district. The one Vos currently overseas. Help her campaign out with a donation please. http://kellyForD33.com Right now China can purchase as many acres as they want in Wisconsin, there is no limit (they just have to repurpose it). All because of Robin Vos. @repvos @shaesortwell @RepTiffany @TylerAugust @WisGOP @TeamTrump @LaraLeeTrump @EmeraldRobinson @BehizyTweets @PatrickByrne @SenKnodl I'm told much more is coming!

Kelly for District 33 – Kelly for District 33Kelly for District 33 – Kelly for District 33 kellyford33.com
Saved - November 6, 2024 at 2:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated to report that all 13 tabulators at the Milwaukee Center Count had their seals broken, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the process. Jenna Rae from TMJ4 News mentioned that mail-in ballot counting started at 8:45 AM, despite state law allowing it to begin at 7 AM. With only 31,000 ballots processed by 4:45 PM, it seems like a deliberate delay. Paulina Gutierrez, the city election clerk, is not handling this well, and it feels reminiscent of the issues we faced in 2020. Our team is on-site, while RNC attorneys are just watching from afar.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Seals broken on ALL 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Center Count! Claim: door was not closed properly, yeah right...on all 13 tabulators? HUGE questions abound: Jenna Rae of TMJ4 News said they began counting mail-in ballots at 8:45am. What? State law permits ballot processing to begin at 7am. Second source said they began at 8:39am. What is going on Paulina Gutierrez? She is the city election clerk, and she is a disaster! #Milwaukee What say you Mayor Cavalier Johnson? @MKEmayor TMJ4 News says from 8:45am until 4:45pm they only ran 31,000 through the 13 tabulators. What the heck? They have many high speed tabulators, the DS950 model runs 280 ballots per minute (and yes have to account for feeding in times, etc., but still). 31,000 divided by 280/min = 111 minutes, or 1.85 hours. From 8:45am plus 1.85 hours = 10:36am Paulina had 12 other tabulators. She could have had 31,000 ballots fed in within 20 to 30 minutes, yet it took her until 4:45pm. Eight hours!!! This is by design citizens, she is delaying just like they did in 2020. See 5 tweets below for details, photos. Three tabulators they are using credit cards to flatten the ballots. Our TeamWISCONSIN is there, inside and out, while 14 (yes 14) RNC attorneys are sitting in a room watching the news. Not going to the Central Count in Milwaukee. Unbelievable! Gutierrez:

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

WOW - stickers on all 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Central Count broken! They are going to start all over counting from the beginning! This is it citizens, this is their Georgia "waterpipe break", their 2.5 dinner break from Nov.3rd 2020 in Milwaukee. Announcement by election officials: "we will be counting till 2-3am" Announcement by Peter: we have TeamWISCONSIN in place to catch these SOB's. 🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨 Call the National Guard in now! See tweet requoted here for the gory details:

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 2:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I need your help, America! Paulina Gutierrez, the new election clerk in Milwaukee, is causing delays in the election process. Despite having paid workers available, only 4 out of 13 tabulators are operational, and many ballots are left unprocessed. We were informed that counting may last until 2-3 AM, yet workers are idling. Paulina hasn't been seen at Central Count, and issues like ballots from incorrect wards and the need for remakes are piling up. State law allows for earlier tabulation, but they started late. Please contact the City of Milwaukee Election Commission and urge Paulina to expedite the process!

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

ATTENTION America we need your help! New election clerk Paulina Gutierrez is slow walking the election right now at Central Count in the City of Milwaukee. We need you all to contact her office and demand she get to work and speed up the election - here's why: -paid workers are milling around, ballots are stacked up, but only 4 of the 13 tabulators are being fed ballots at any given time; sometimes no tabulators are running!! -announcement was just made they expect to be counting ballots till 2-3am Nov.6th...but tons of workers milling around doing nothing -Paulina has NOT been seen at Central Count at all -Lots of "skinny" ballots -Wis. Election Commissioner Ann Jacobs is sitting on the floor at Central Count, which is being held this year at the Baird Convention Center downtown Milwaukee, she is doing NOTHING to move things along -Ballots are coming in from the wrong wards -Many ballots, they say, have to be remade! -State law permits opening and tabulating the ballots beginning at 7am; at 8:30am they still were not doing so; they began at 9:38am!!!! Unbelievable. -Contact the City of Milwaukee Election Commission at Room 501 City Hall and demand Paulina get the election going!!!! HELP us, call them, email them. Be polite but firm. Where are you @RepKrug @SenKnodl @BryanSteil @RonJohnson ? Gutierrez:

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 11:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
WOW - all 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Central Count are broken due to stickers! They're starting the count over from the beginning. This feels like a repeat of past election issues. Election officials announced counting will go until 2-3am. TeamWISCONSIN is ready to monitor the situation. Time to call in the National Guard!

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

WOW - stickers on all 13 tabulators at Milwaukee Central Count broken! They are going to start all over counting from the beginning! This is it citizens, this is their Georgia "waterpipe break", their 2.5 dinner break from Nov.3rd 2020 in Milwaukee. Announcement by election officials: "we will be counting till 2-3am" Announcement by Peter: we have TeamWISCONSIN in place to catch these SOB's. 🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨 Call the National Guard in now! See tweet requoted here for the gory details:

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

ATTENTION America we need your help! New election clerk Paulina Gutierrez is slow walking the election right now at Central Count in the City of Milwaukee. We need you all to contact her office and demand she get to work and speed up the election - here's why: -paid workers are milling around, ballots are stacked up, but only 4 of the 13 tabulators are being fed ballots at any given time; sometimes no tabulators are running!! -announcement was just made they expect to be counting ballots till 2-3am Nov.6th...but tons of workers milling around doing nothing -Paulina has NOT been seen at Central Count at all -Lots of "skinny" ballots -Wis. Election Commissioner Ann Jacobs is sitting on the floor at Central Count, which is being held this year at the Baird Convention Center downtown Milwaukee, she is doing NOTHING to move things along -Ballots are coming in from the wrong wards -Many ballots, they say, have to be remade! -State law permits opening and tabulating the ballots beginning at 7am; at 8:30am they still were not doing so; they began at 9:38am!!!! Unbelievable. -Contact the City of Milwaukee Election Commission at Room 501 City Hall and demand Paulina get the election going!!!! HELP us, call them, email them. Be polite but firm. Where are you @RepKrug @SenKnodl @BryanSteil @RonJohnson ? Gutierrez:

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 1:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I filed a sworn complaint with the Wisconsin Election Commission against the Kenosha City Clerk for only testing one of the 36 ES&S tabulators ahead of tomorrow's election, violating state law. She claimed to have tested the others but failed to provide the required public notice. Consequently, these voting machines cannot be used. I also submitted public records requests for system logs and test details. An eyewitness mentioned that the modem shares broadband with police and fire departments, raising further questions.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Exclusive: I just filed a sworn complaint with the Wis. Election Commission against the City Clerk of Kenosha. She only tested 1 out of 36 ES&S tabulators for the election tomorrow. State law(s) required her to test all of them, with the public noticed in advance and an opportunity for them to be present. She did not do this; she claimed she tested the other 35 tabulators the days before. But admitted she did not follow the law in providing the mandatory notice to the public in advance of the date and time. These voting machines cannot be used in the election tomorrow. Here is the notice statute: "7.15(1)(d) Prepare the necessary notices and publications in connection with the conduct of elections or registrations." Here are the mandatory machine testing and also notice requirements: "5.84 Testing of equipment; requirements for programs and ballots. (1) Where any municipality employs an electronic voting system which utilizes automatic tabulating equipment, either at the polling place or at a central counting location, the municipal clerk shall, on any day not more than 10 days prior to the election day on which the equipment is to be utilized, have the equipment tested to ascertain that it will correctly count the votes cast for all offices and on all measures. Public notice of the time and place of the test shall be given by the clerk at least 48 hours prior to the test by publication of a class 1 notice under ch. 985 in one or more newspapers published within the municipality if a newspaper is published therein, otherwise in a newspaper of general circulation therein. The test shall be open to the public. The test shall be conducted by processing a preaudited group of ballots so marked as to record a predetermined number of valid votes for each candidate and on each referendum. The test shall include for each office one or more ballots which have votes in excess of the number allowed by law and, for a partisan primary election, one or more ballots which have votes cast for candidates of more than one recognized political party, in order to test the ability of the automatic tabulating equipment to reject such votes. If any error is detected, the municipal clerk shall ascertain the cause and correct the error. The clerk shall make an errorless count before the automatic tabulating equipment is approved by the clerk for use in the election. (2) Before beginning the ballot count at each polling place or at the central counting location, the election officials shall witness a test of the automatic tabulating equipment by engaging the printing mechanism and securing a printed result showing a zero count for every candidate and referendum. After the completion of the count, the ballots and programs used shall be sealed and retained under the custody of the municipal clerk in a secure location." I also submitted public records requests to the same City of Kenosha Clerk for system logs of the tabulator testing, copies of the test decks of ballots fed in and other information. "Apparently the modem uses the same broadband as police and fire department" according to one of the three eye-witnesses (who attended the public voting machine testing of 1 tabulator). I wonder what that is about. 😎 If only Guy Smith would comment on this... @BryanSteil

Saved - October 27, 2024 at 4:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The United States Postal Service has altered the delivery method for absentee mail-in ballots, preventing the creation of electronic images that could serve as evidence against ballot fraud. This change follows a series of consolidations that began in 2011 and intensified in 2022, moving operations from over 200 facilities to just 21 regional centers. Recently, USPS officials ordered that ballots not be sent to central sorting facilities, which means no electronic images are generated. This decision, attributed to Amber McReynolds, raises concerns about transparency and accountability in the voting process.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

BOMBSHELL - the United States Postal Service recently changed the delivery method of absentee mail-in ballots! They are hiding the evidence of absentee mail-in ballot fraud - by not allowing the evidence to be created in the first place. Here's how and what changed: You can't get the absentee mail-in vote ballot images from the USPS because they are not sending them to the central sorting facilities! Normally, you mail a letter to someone or a bill goes out, it goes to your local post office, then it gets to a central sorting facility. Wisconsin for example has six: Madison, Milwaukee, Oak Creek, Green Bay, N. Illinois and Eagan MN that sorts/handles all mail. Even if mailed to your neighbor 1 house over, that is how the system works. Obama did this in 2011-2012, consolidating the USPS to have less total facilities. Then, the USPS began consolidating its central sorting facilities in August 2022 and continued through February 2023. The consolidation plans included moving delivery operations from over 200 "spoke offices" to 21 regional Sort and Delivery Centers. Where absentee mail-in ballots should go through a central sorting facility: where each and every one would get scanned and an electronic image created. BOMBSHELL: a telecon was held for the higher ups in the USPS, and the order trickled down to all the faculties NOT to send the ballots to central sorting. Meaning no electronic images are being created! Confirmed at three locations in Wisconsin, confirmed at one Regional office of the USPS, confirmed at one location in Colorado. And, it explains why they denied me my FOIA request for said images: because there are none. See letter they sent me attached here. If you remember in 2020 the UPSP was caught deleting evidence of these very electronic images. Still this day they still have not produced them. The UPSP recently directed, less than a month, post offices to NOT send absentee mail-in ballots to central sort. But instead take them to the election clerks. Meaning again: no electronic ballot images are being created in the first place. The USPS is doing this on purpose. And who did this? Amber McReynolds, an Obama/Biden plant at the USPS. "Head of the Zuckerberg Bucks National Vote at Home Institute, Amber McReynolds, was appointed by Biden to the US Postal Service governing board" quote and image with red circles from @pepesgrandma - thank you. @EmeraldRobinson @nataliegwinters @BehizyTweets @PatrickByrne @TrueTheVote @yehuda_miller @JonesNed @elonmusk @Cse_stop_bogus @TuckerCarlson @immutablechrist

Saved - October 19, 2024 at 9:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently analyzed the absentee ballot request list and found 744,076 registrants, which we narrowed down to 380,050 after removing inactive voters. Among these, there were numerous issues: 2,777 had permanently moved, 2,325 had undeliverable addresses, and 7,571 had incorrect or missing secondary address information. Overall, 30,724 entries had discrepancies. Given these findings, I believe we should ban absentee voting, similar to several countries. I also urge support for efforts to remove Robin Vos from office.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

We purchased the absentee ballot request list, from March 1st 2024 until a couple of days ago. Registrants on the list: 744,076. We removed the Inactives bringing the number down to 380,050 and here is what we found: 2,777 permanently moved out of state 2,325 address not deliverable and not found in the USPS database 7,571 incorrect or missing secondary (missing APT #5 for example) 513 door not accessible 976 single receptacle drop for mail for all residents at same physical address 97 No secure location at all to leave mail 13 Registered to a US Post Office street address 1,251 vacant for more than 90 days (person not rec. mail for more than 90 days, not necessarily an empty house) 31 Registered to a commercial address such as a UPS, Fedex store 3,408 Duplicates (needs to be checked, sometimes father/son but they omitted suffixes) 275 Moved but left no forwarding address 168 At high rise building but not housing 442 Identified as a business location, but not commercial 10,877 Not all components of the address match up to what is in the USPS database 30,724 in total These are ACTIVELY registered voters in Wisconsin who this year requested an absentee ballot for the Nov.5th election. We must ban absentee voting just like Mexico has, as did Germany, Ukraine, Russia, France and all of South American countries. And like China did, oh wait, communist China doesn't have elections - silly me. The same China "Republican" Robin Vos is protecting as a Vice Chair of an organization, SLLF, even the FBI warned politicians to stay away from. @RepRonTusler @repvos Help with donations to Kelly Clerk to oust Vos from office here: @kellyforD33 @stopbogusballots

Saved - October 15, 2024 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some alarming information regarding election fraud from Patrick Byrne. A video reveals that Waukesha County, WI, and several counties in PA and IL are using a corrupt ballot printer, Michigan Election Resources (MER), which has been overprinting ballots. They printed extra ballots and allegedly sold them to illicit parties. A truck driver, Jesse Morgan, discovered filled-out fraudulent ballots while trying to deliver a load in Lancaster, PA. The evidence suggests a coordinated effort involving unions and the US Postal Service, with implications of larger entities like BlackRock.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Explosive election fraud information from Patrick Byrne. Most shocking video I have seen about election fraud in the last four years. Waukesha County WI using corrupt ballot printer to have ballots printed. As is Delaware and Lancaster counties PA, DuPage county IL Michigan Election Resources (MER) in Kalamazoo, MI had/has ballot printing contracts for several counties across the USA. What they have been doing is overage printing, i.e. a county orders 300,000 ballots yet MER would then print 325,000. Selling the extra 25,000 to the bad guys. Michigan Election Resources Printing Services Kalamazoo, MI 100 followers 11-50 employees (from their LinkedIn page) Image attached is from one of their proposals, using the four counties named above as references. MER prints for numerous counties across the nation. This is what truck driver Jesse Morgan was hauling: a batch of these illegal ballots. From New York down to Lancaster, PA. But he was the wrong driver/truck and the paperwork was messed up, he could not unload. That is when he opened up the back of the truck and discovered the filled out ballots. Kicker: he was in Lancaster PA to drop the load of fraudulent ballots to the Postal Service. That is how they were getting the phony ballots back into the system. The election clerks would see the US Postal Stamp on mail coming into them and have no clue the ballots were in fact fraudulent. Unions filling out ballots! in video @SEIU US Postal Service deleted volumes of evidence - in video. @USPS BlackRock behind it! in video @BlackRock How many counties did MER print extra ballots for?? 25min video link, must watch big part of how the 2020 election was stolen: Source of information is discovery in a federal lawsuit still ongoing in Washington DC, link to case: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63178307/della-rocca-v-united-states-postal-service/ @PatrickByrne @EmeraldRobinson @BehizyTweets @nataliegwinters @AsheinAmerica

DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 - CourtListener.com Docket for DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. courtlistener.com

@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne

Royal Flush: a brisk walk-through of USPS corruption of election 2020, our FOIA case regarding it, and our emergency injunction against USPS this week. Our original FOIA case seeking USPS 2020 records: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63178307/della-rocca-v-united-states-postal-service/ A good synopsis can be found in the attached post. https://x.com/PatrickByrne/status/1845275341742395467/video/1

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, a ballot printing company allegedly printed extra ballots beyond their contracts, shipping them to Flushing, NY, where they were filled out, then sent to Bethpage, NY, to be reintegrated into the mail system. Truck driver Jesse Morgan reported transporting a truckload of these ballots to Lancaster, PA. This truck may have contained 1 to 1.5 million ballots, and there were 8 other trucks. The Postal Service changed its document retention policy from 6 years to 90 days before the election, allegedly destroying relevant documents, then changed it back. This change was approved by Judge Emmett Sullivan. For 4 years, there has been a fight to find out who paid for the trucks. The Postal Service has resisted providing this information, even with judicial orders. A case was filed against the Postal Service in Maryland, arguing they cannot be involved in elections due to their actions in 2020. An emergency injunction was sought, and a hearing is scheduled. The aim is to demand radical transparency from the Postal Service regarding ballot movement or to prevent their involvement in the election altogether.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team Freedom. Patrick here. It's about time I come clean about the postal service, lawsuits we have. There's now 2 of them, and I may as well just review this briskly. In 2020, you may remember a whistleblower came forward named Jesse Morgan. It was a trucker who said that he had been given a strange trucking load, and he looked into it and he found some funny things. I'm gonna walk you through what what really happened there. What really happened there is this. When I built Overstock, we had an issue where sometimes you would buy what you try not to, but you would get great goods. And this is how that work. And believe me, this will transport directly over and translate directly into discussing, ballots. Somebody would go North Face would go to Taiwan and have some factory make 10,000 sleeping bags for them. North Face, you know, under license in North Face, so forth. That factory would stay open an extra weekend and run another 2,000 sleeping bags. And then they would go into the market and sell them as North Face sleeping bags. Now and you you were at a great price and as a discount as, you know, we would buy them. Well, it turns out and but it would turn out that they weren't well, they were forensically, they were North Face. It was the same factory, the same paperwork, the same labels, the same employees had done it. They were not actually produced under license to North Face, and so that was called gray goods. And keeping that stuff out of our supply chain was a full time job for 1 Water. Was always looking at paperwork. Well, in the creation of ballots, the same thing happened in 2020. There was a ballot company in Michigan who won a bunch of contracts to to print ballots for this county and that county all over America, about 20 different states. What they were doing, was they were if they got a contract to print 200,000 ballots for 1 county, they would print up 300,000 and take those extra 100,000, and they would ship them off to Europe, to to, Europe, to New York, to a place called Flushing, New York, which has has a long history with a radical left. There was a facility there, a 100 people in a room associated with a union called SEIU, filling those ballots out. And the same thing was going on with all the counties that this that this printing company in Michigan supplied. So these people would fill them out a very well organized effort. We'd be filling them out, and then they were sent to Bethpage, New York. And at Bethpage, New York, there was a facility, on Grumman Road, I believe it was called, where these were taken and they were re they they were reintegrated into the mail. They were integrated into the mail system as possible. Now the Bethpage, New York facility is a postal, station, but it's not set up to handle 1st class mail and ballots of 1st class mail. And if you're gonna handle 1st class mail, you need something called an Oregon machine. But they don't have an Oregon machine. But they were handling 1st class mail, and they were putting them in gaylords. What is a gaylord? A gaylord there's a picture of a gaylord on the front of this, associated with this video. A gaylord is a a box or a big canvas shopping version of a shopping cart, but much bigger. And it's on wheels, 4 wheels. And anytime you do warehouse work where you're moving lots of letters or packages, they get put in things called gaylords, and then you move these boxes on wheels. Is it worth to think of them as very big shopping carts made sometimes made out of with canvas walls on wheels, and that's what you move around the warehouse. So each gaylord holds 50 to a 100000 ballots. Between October 18th October 21, 2020, 8 get, trucks came in from a company called area trucking area road and trucking, and they were filled up with gaylords, 20 to 30 gaylords, and sent on their way to Lancaster, PA. One day, a on one of those 3 days in late in mid late October 2020, a trucking company, a different trucking company, it's truck pulled in. It was called 10 road 10 roads trucking. 10 roads trucking. And and, driven by a guy named Jesse Morgan. And somebody at the facility made a mistake, and they loaded those ballots onto the wrong onto his truck, wrong company's truck. He got the paperwork and he said, truck this to Lancaster, PA. He trucked it to Lancaster, PA. That, that was the guy. His name was Jesse Morgan. That he got to Lancaster, PA. He was kept waiting for 6 hours because the paperwork wasn't from the right company and whatever who he went in the back of his truck and he found 20 gaylords. May have been 20 as much as 27 gaylords. Well, if each one holds if there were only 20 and each one held only 50,000, the truth is they can hold up to a 100,000 ballots. That well, 20 gaylords and 50,000 ballots. That's a 1000000 ballots. And by the way, these ballots, the envelope, they were filled in and the outside envelopes were signed. And that's because in this facility in Flushing, New York, there were a 100 union folks sitting there at tables filling out ballots for Joe Biden and signing the outside in the envelope. Of course, so that's that was the the supply chain that got them from a a printing company was that was deliberately printing up great goods, extra ballots, getting them to this left wing group in Flushing, New York who was filling them out and signing them to a for a postal facility in Bethpage, New York that wasn't supposed to be handling first class, mail, but yet it was handling ballots, which were first class mail, loading them into a truck, getting them to Lancaster, PA. And there, they were entering the mail system as mail in ballots. Well, that just that one Jesse Morgan truck had at least a 1000000 ballots in it. It may have had a 1000000 and a half ballots. And then he went back and he he looked at it, and that's what he found when he went back in. There were there were 20 to 27 gay boards each with 50 to a 100000 ballots. We could determine later by weight. And they, so a minimum of a million, probably more like a1000000 and a half ballots. And remember, that was one of 9 trucks. We know there were 8 other trucks from some other company. So 8 or 9 times a1000000 is 8 to 9000000, but it may have been 9 times a 1000000 and a half or more. So maybe more like 12, 13,000,000 ballots or re mailing ballots were integrated into the mail system through this this chain that I just described. And that's just in the north. We think there was something similar going on in the south and this involving a company called Runback. Different story. But that's what happened in 2020. And that's the that's this whistleblower who came forward. Now that whistleblower came forward and he told this story. He was immediately picked up by the feds, held in some, you know, basement for 9 hours, questioned. And the feds came out with a piece of paper saying he just signed something that retracted the statement he he gave him. He immediately came out and said, look, I was in the underground with these feds, and they berated me for 9 hours to get me to retract my story. At a recent point, they said they were gonna kill me and my family or something. And at that point to get out of it, I said I withdraw, but and I signed something that says I'd take this back. That was so I didn't get killed in this basement. I came out and I'm telling you folks the truth. That absolutely was the truth, what I had to say. We investigated that and we had the wonderful John Bornahan, part of the America project, as a 25 year federal officer from the DEA, but now he's in a private kind of a specialty practice. And he does odd investigations. We have affidavits from people who were involved, people who worked in the in the Bethpage facility. We have the whole chain of command mapped out. But the last thing we needed was, okay, tell us who paid for those trucks. Now it gets interesting. So now I'm giving you a history. If you've been following my videos over the years, you will have heard a lot of this, maybe not all of it. I've never really deliberately never really put it all together for everybody because I've given you this history and then giving you a new development in the last month that's big. So for 4 years, we fought with the postal service to say, okay. Who paid for that truck? Somebody paid for those trucks. And, you know, we think it was the DNC or it's gonna be turned out to be Kleiner Perkins and some DNC front company paid for all this. They have fought turning that over like it's the nuclear codes to turn over that information. In the process of the postal service turning fighting to turn that over, some really funny things came out. One of them is that federal agencies so federal postal service takes a picture of every first class mail that comes through. There's a digital picture. There's huge server farms the postal service maintains where everything's really recorded. All the movement of every piece of paper. If we're correct, there's 10 to 12, 13,000,000 ballots out there, which there will be no digital photos for of how they of how they got it. If they really got into the system naturally, people just turning them in, there would be they would've there'd be a digital photo trail along the way of all of those ballots. There is none because they didn't they're not legitimate. They they were created like I just described, taken to a not to a postal facility not legally able to handle 1st class mail and reintegrated into the mail system as I just described. They they would provide no information on the background of those 12,000,000 ballots and in including who paid for the trucking. Because if it turns out it was the DNC or Kleiner Perkins who paid for those trucks, then that kinda answers everything. Well, the the branches of the parts of the executive branch, they all have what you're talking about the IRS, you're talking about the EPA. They all have a documents retention policy just like any company does. And then publicly traded company has to maintain all documents for 6:6 years. So if a if a lawsuit comes in or the SEC comes in, you can sort of recreate everything that's happened in every part of the company for 6 years. And that's what the federal government has. In 2020, in March or April of 2020, 9 months before the election, the postal service changed their document retention policy. How long they keep documents From a 6 year look back to a 90 day look back. K? 90 days, maybe even 30 days on some types of things. They got through and they now they got through the election, got 30 to 90 days out destroyed, claimed to have destroyed all their documents related to the election. And then they changed their look back policy to 6 years again. They changed it from 6 years to 90 days, got into during 2020, got through the election, got everything destroyed, and then changed it back to 6 years. Well, there's something called the Administrative Procedures Act. I think it's 1971, which says when a federal agency changes some administrative procedure, how it works is it publishes to the public, we're considering changing some rule. And the public has 60 days to study it and 30 days to write their their feelings about that and what they want. And then the agency has, you know, it's this very formal process. It has 30 days where they come back and they propose a new rule and then the public has another comment period. And then finally, the agency publishes its rule. They didn't do any of that as they change these procedures. The only way they can get around doing those things is the administrative procedures act does allow for a a regulator or administrative part of the government to change its procedures without going through that rigmarole if they get the sign off of a federal judge. And the postal service has, in fact, in 2020, gotten the sign off of a federal judge. That federal judge is Emmett Sullivan. And if you've been paying attention, Emmett Sullivan is the very strange judge who oversaw the Mike Flynn fiasco for the DOJ where they hounded Mike Flynn, a decorated 3 star general. They hounded him for 3 4 4 years, 5 years, saying, they they hounded him. He, at at one point, the media was actually say, well, he plead guilty. He did submit a guilty plea for when they for a nothing burger offense when they threatened his son with 25 years. But he got into it and he withdrew the guilty plea. The media will never tell you that. He withdrew withdrew the guilty plea, fought it on. Eventually, the DOJ got a retired judge to come in and look at the whole case. They said this whole case is trumped up. It should never been brought. But this guy, Emmett Sullivan, he'd never accepted the guilty plea, which is why when people say, Flynn is a convicted felon. He's not a convicted felon. He submitted a guilty plea to a felony. The judge didn't accept it. The judge savored it like a fine wine and danced around for months. So the media could say, we have a guilty plea from from Michael Flynn. Well, because he took so long, that gave Michael Flynn time as he learned more and in particular learned how crooked the case was that had been fabricated against him. He withdrew the guilty plea. So they that judge never accepted the guilty plea, which means Mike Flynn is not. Like, he was never convicted. He may never accepted the plea. They fought it on and a retired judge from Saint Louis or somebody came in and looked at it all and said this whole thing is a big lark and the DOJ and they should never been brought and the DOJ dropped the case. That's the judge, Emmett Sullivan, who refused to let it drop and said, well, I'm gonna prosecute Michael Flynn. Well, that's not how prosecutions work. The judge is a the neutral judge and the government brings a case and there's the defendant. A judge in American history has never said I'm gonna run my own prosecution of this guy. It was ridiculous. And that went on until Trump pardoned this kangaroo pardon him out of this kangaroo court situation. That's and it's Sullivan. That's the same judge who signed off in 2020 on this Mickey Mouse behavior from the postal service that let them destroy their records. I've just summarized a 4 year multimillion dollar fight, multimillion dollar fight, 2, $3,000,000 fight. You know, people wonder what the what the American project does. It funds so many things like this. It fund so many things like this. That but that's and and now I'll be putting it online either I'll be putting it online probably on Telegram is where I put a bunch of documents. I'll attach what I can to this local's broadcast. The they finally in, like, September put well, actually, finding that out, I'll tell you this with the postal service. It was so clear they were in the wrong that eventually, the they got a lawyer not from the chief legal counsel of the US Postal Service. All we had was a FOIA case, a Freedom of Information Act case in Washington DC set telling us saying, who paid for those trucks? You know, somebody pays for them. 10 roads, trucking area, trucking didn't didn't just do that on their own. Somebody paid for those trucks. Finally, judges, I mean, Obama appointees and and democratic judges who were involved in the process were telling the postal service you have to turn that information over. But somewhere in there, the postal service finally turned over, and they kept saying we don't have the information. We don't have the information. We were able to prove they did. They had it. There were different ways it was buried. They finally turned over a sheet about the billings from that facility on on those three dates in October of 2020. It was, like, 9th 18th 19th 20th, I think. And they had whited out those 3 dates. They and and then they ended up saying, we will we will not turn over not even with a judicial order, we will not turn over information for those 3 dates. So and in a normal world, that would be proof of guilt, you know, long ago proof of guilt. Their own DOJ attorneys let us know and let in filings, they were ordering their their people, their client, in this case, the US Postal Service, to turn the information over and the client just wouldn't return wouldn't turn it over. Finally, we got an affidavit filed in September of this year from some guy who oversees the and I'll I'll include as much of this as I can in the, in the notes that you can look at these things yourself. An affidavit saying we don't have the data. Well, at this point, there's a judge, Daphne Daphne Friedman in Washington DC who's had enough, and she clearly doesn't believe. And there is nothing I mean, there's nothing to believe. They've just stonewalled us and the judicial system for 4 years turning over simple information, which makes us really confident what that information is, is something like who paid for that trucking that was is gonna turn out to be Kleiner Perkins or some other democratic front paid for that. And and, so, boom, that is background. We filed a case in late August, again, in May in, Maryland with a federal judge in Maryland against the postal service saying, look, they clearly cheated. They cheated on all these FOIA responses. They've been hiding this information. They're lying. They're clearly lying because we've, time and again, we've proven that they have information that they claim they didn't have. And so we finally went to the postal service 2 months ago and said I mean, we went to the judiciary 2 months ago and said the postal service cannot be involved in an election. Given what they did in 2020 and given how they've stonewalled and buried and refused to answer these questions, they're clear. And there's so many, so much evidence, including the affidavits we have from people in that chain of command. They cannot be involved in the election in 2020. Incidentally, it's unconstitutional unconstitutional. You cannot have any part of the executive branch of the federal government involved in an election. That's like really clear law. And yet, so everything they've done and, of course, since Biden came to power, he created a special division of the postal service to be involved in elections. That's unconstitutional. So we brought all this, including the postal services' crooked behavior over the preceding 4 years to a federal judge in Maryland and said and join them from being involved in this election. That judge has taken this very seriously. They tried to get it dismissed. It wasn't dismissed. And now that Georgia's ordered judges ordered on Thursday or Friday, 2 days ago, we called for a an emergency injunction against the postal service, and the judge has granted it. So coming up, I believe, early this week, there is an there's a hearing on a federal judges injunction against telling the postal service they can't be involved in this election. Well, given how close we are to the election, it's highly unlikely the judge is going to go along with that remedy. But a lesser remedy is to say, okay. Then you have to demand radical transparency right now out of the postal service on all the movement of everything ballot related for this election. Otherwise, we're going to just they're just gonna stuff like crazy the mail in ballots and present us with a fait accompli like they did in 2020. And no one will have any reason to judge to to trust these elections. So you just have to demand radical judge. You have to order immediately on an emergency injunction, radical transparency into the everything in the postal service involved with moving ballots. That's where things stand. That was filed on Thursday or Friday. I believe it was granted. I believe this week, there is an emergency hearing in a Maryland court. By the way, the head of the Postal Service lives at the the postmaster general lives in Maryland, and that gives us reason to to have filed this in Maryland. And my understanding is we have a judge, not a friendly judge in Maryland, but a non crooked judge in Maryland. And he's taking the postal services trying to get this kicked out or squashed, and the judge is having none of it. So there's a hearing coming up this week in a federal courtroom in Maryland where we're asking a judge at the very least. I mean, what you really should do is just say you cannot be involved in any election, which is incidentally what the con what the law and the constitution says. But if he's not gonna do something that extreme of remedy this late in the game, he certainly is, has the capacity to change things by demanding radical transparency immediately within the postal service for inspection, for any any movement of balance in this election. So I have given that as tersely and concisely as I can. I will attach to my low I'll put this up in locals. I'll put up other places too, but I will attach to it links to, associated reading for further reading. Okay? So sorry we've been playing this this so close to the vest. I've spoken for a long time of a royal flush. This has been the royal flush. And the ace was finding out I mean, we actually put together. We know where those fake ballots well, that's just a thing. They weren't fake ballots. They were ballots printed in a real printing company that was in on it is in on the fix up in Michigan. And just like that, when I give you the North Face tent exam or sleeping bag example from Taiwan, those sleeping bags aren't fake. But in the sense, they're fake. They're just not you you see what I mean? They're fake. That mean they're manufactured out of license. That what makes them very good. Well, our system is awash in very good balance. They don't have to be made in China. This stuff about them being printed in China, back in 2020, I don't know if any of that's true. Although we did see place where there were Chinese indications of Chinese printing, but the the main event is not that they're printed somewhere else. They can be printed in the actual facility that's supposed to be printed in ballots, but they're just doing overruns and they're using those overruns to feed into the system this way. We have we know what happened in 2020. The only parts we don't know are the parts that they have broken the law by erasing, by shielding, by stonewalling for 4 years for 4 years. And shame on the federal judiciary. This has only happened because it's taken 4 years and they still, through their mechanism, could not get let us get to the bottom, to the true bottom of anything. But given the behavior of the postal service, it's clear that they were involved in massive, you know, fraud on a 10 to 13,000,000 vote level back in 2020. I think they're stepping it up for this election. That so this is the hijacking of the country gets complete if it isn't stopped, and it has to be stopped right now. And we have all the information in if you for further reading. And it is now in front of a federal judge in Maryland seeking we're we're seeking at least a federal injunction against demanding radical transparency, if not eliminating the postal service from this game at all, which is really what the right the right solution is. Okay? So further reading attached. I'll put up this video a few places. If you want the the the links for further reading, you have to find my locals account. Okay. Patrick Byrne signing off.
DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 - CourtListener.com Docket for DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. courtlistener.com
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 1:05 PM

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Election Watch, Inc. is offering a reward of $25,000 for the information leading to the arrests and convictions of people ballot harvesting on a mass scale in the City of Milwaukee for the November 5th election. Donations are appreciated: http://www.electionwatch.info

Election Watch Election Watch Info is a non-profit organization that aims to promote transparency, integrity, and accountability in elections worldwide. They provide comprehensive coverage and analysis of electoral processes, from pre-election preparations to post-election developments, with a particular focus on issues such as voter access, election security, and disinformation. Election Watch Info also offers tools and resources for monitoring and reporting on elections, including a database of election-related news and a platform for crowdsourced election monitoring. They collaborate with local and international partners, including election management bodies, civil society organizations, and academic institutions, to support election observation and advocacy efforts. Through their work, Election Watch Info seeks to enhance the credibility and legitimacy of electoral processes and to empower citizens to participate in the democratic process. electionwatch.info
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 4:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the controversial history of Dominion Voting Systems, highlighting its founding in Canada and its progressive mission to create electronic voting systems. The article details how, under the Obama administration, Dominion acquired significant assets from established American companies, effectively monopolizing the U.S. electronic voting market. It raises concerns about the software's vulnerabilities and the potential for manipulation, emphasizing the need for transparency and trust in voting systems. The post also discusses Dominion's ties to foreign entities and its partisan alignment with the Democratic Party.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Shocking History of Dominion Voting - How Obama rigged the creation of Dominion Voting Co. I need help in identifying who wrote this stunning article below, wish to give them credit. Since 2009, Dominion Voting Systems operated from 215 Spadina Ave., Toronto, ON, M5T 2C7,Canada – an office space of the radical Tides Foundation. This building houses (or housed until a few months ago) a Toronto office of Tides Canada and a Tides’ incubation space for leftist groups. Dominion Voting Systems Corp. is the Canadian company behind the ballot switching software. Dominion was founded in 2003, with a mission to provide electronic voting systems friendly for progressives. Because of such partisanship, it languished with almost no customers for the next 5-6 years, until the Obama administration came to power. In 2010, the Obama administration confiscated electronic voting systems assets (software, intellectual property, manufacturing tools, customer base, etc.) from two established American companies, and gave them to Dominion. At the same time, Dominion got some employees and assets from a foreign EVS company, tied to Hugo Chavez. Its software has been used by some 40% of the voters in this elections, mostly by Democrat-controlled states and election commissions. Apparently, no protections were put in place against ballot switching, deletion, or creation. According to Dominion’s own website, it software was used in “battleground” states and the largest Democrat states, including MI, GA, AZ, NV, NM, CO, AK, UT, NJ, CA, NY. Dominion Early History Dominion Voting System Corp., was founded in Canada in 2002-2003 with an openly progressive mission – to develop electronic voting software which would not just process ballots, but also “mobilize voters” – a popular slogan of the Left. It is not clear what products or services the company has developed. It found almost no buyers, until Obama was elected in 2008. In 2009, New York ordered a few dozens of systems from it. In 2010, Obama’s DOJ (Holder – Mueller) took the EVS unit, purchased from Diebold, away from the market leader ES&S, and gave it to Dominion. This gift included the installed base of about 30% of the US electronic voting systems (EVS) market. Within two weeks, Dominion also acquired Sequoia, which was formally spun from Smartmatic, but ties between these two companies remained. Smartmatic is a UK based EVS vendor, whose software was used by Chavez to “win” the Venezuelan referendum in 2004. Smartmatic’s unit Sequoia faced troubles in the US. Those troubles quickly ended when its assets were purchased by Dominion. Thus, the new Democratic party created a pocket pet corporation, gave it the lion share of the US electronic voting systems market. Dominion is ideologically aligned with the Democratic Party, owes it everything it has, dependent on it for most of its business, and needs it in power to avoid prosecution for corruption. Sounds like a conflict of interest. Electronic Voting Using electronic voting machines has always been controversial. The pros for electronic voting – saving working time of the ballot counters – are minuscule. The cons however are infinite. Because software is inherently complex, non-transparent, and volatile, there is always a risk of significant errors. There are also suspicions and doubts about election results. The complexity of software and hardware on which voting machines run has been continually increasing, aggravating these concerns. At the beginning of 2009, there were four major US EVS suppliers: ES&S, Premier (a unit of Nixdorf-Diebold), Sequoia (linked to Smartmatic), and Hart Intercivic. The market size was a few hundred million dollars a year and growing. EVS vendors competed among themselves and against traditional pen and paper voting. There were no barriers to entry for other competitors, other than government’s regulations. Electronic voting, which sounded like a good idea in the 1980s is so no more. Electronic voting machines and their vendors were under criticism for many years. In 2007-2008, this criticism materialized in the SEC, DOJ, and states lawsuits against the voting machines vendors. Diebold was catching flack for having a prominent Republican party supporter among their top executives. It spun its EVS unit as a separate company Premier, and was looking for a buyer. The existing vendors were burdened with liabilities, including DOJ investigations. This opened up an opportunity for the Obama administration. Technical Vulnerabilities of EVS Systems The voting software developers can easily insert code, changing numbers in favor of or against one candidate. No hacking is necessary. The malicious code can be designed to pass tests and to be triggered only at the time of a real election, automatically or manually. Both case are possible even the the machine is disconnected from the internet and has no ordinary I/O devices. The malicious code can be activated manually in real time by inserting a ballot or another paper with a pre-defined QR or image code. An audit of the source code is necessary, but not sufficient. Dominion software runs on Windows, and the malicious code can be hidden in any part of the operating system. Malicious code can be hidden in the firmware, too. If a state wants to take risks and to rely on testing and the source code audit, they should be conducted with the participation of technically competent representatives of both parties. If the system passes testing and auditing, the machine image must be securely stored. All supplied machines must have exactly the same hardware and the software as the audited system. As far as I know, thorough tests and source code audits are conducted very rarely, if at all. Further, the vendors are not required to use only the audited image, and are allowed to update the software almost at will. That means that election commissions are forced to blindly trust the vendors. Blind trust is always wrong and invites abuse. But even “trust but verify” is applicable only to trustworthy vendors. Dominion Voting is the opposite of trustworthy. The only real solution to the vulnerability of EVS is not to use them at all. Manual ballot counting has no software vulnerabilities, and is much cheaper. Virginia appears to be the only state that decided to use only manual ballots. How Dominion went from nothing to everything in two weeks In September 2009, ES&S acquired Premier [8], without any objections from the DOJ. But in March 2010, the Obama’s DOJ (Eric Holder – Robert Mueller) forced ES&S to “sell” Premier’s assets to Dominion, but to keep its liabilities. In addition, ES&S was forced to license to Dominion some of its software, in perpetuity and free of charge. The pretext for the DOJ action was antitrust. The “Sale” This is how the assets transfer was structured, per DOJ [1] (March 8, 2010). “WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice announced today that it will require Election Systems & Software (ES&S) to divest voting equipment systems assets it purchased in September 2009 from Premier Election Solutions Inc. in order to restore competition. The assets to be divested include the means to produce all versions of Premier’s hardware, software and firmware used to record, tabulate, transmit or report votes, including the Assure 1.2 system, and a license to better serve disabled voters. The department said that today’s settlement will restore competition in voting equipment systems in the United States… “ “In order to restore competition” sounds funny, because the same document also required ES&S to not compete against the buyer (with exceptions). “… the acquisition substantially reduced competition as it combined the two largest providers of systems used to tally votes in federal, state and local elections in the United States. ES&S’s acquisition of Premier made ES&S the provider of more than 70 percent of the voting equipment systems in the United States. The department said that because the cash value of the deal between ES&S and Premier was $5 million, far below the mandatory reporting threshold for mergers under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, the department’s investigation of the transaction did not begin until the companies had combined their assets and dismantled many of Premier’s operating divisions.” Sounds like a poor pretext. The DOJ has been investigating these companies even before the merger, and was aware of it. Further, the DOJ does not allege that the merger has not been reported. Even so, why not simply demand unrolling the merger? The DOJ provides a poor excuse to demand divestiture rather than a normal unrolling. “Under the terms of the settlement, ES&S must divest all of the intellectual property associated with all versions –past, present and in development –of the Premier voting equipment systems to another company. ES&S also must divest all Premier tooling and fixed assets, as well as inventory of parts and components. In order to allow the divestiture buyer to better serve disabled voters, ES&S must also grant a fully paid-up, irrevocable, perpetual license to use the AutoMARK, ES&S’s ballot marking device for which Premier had a limited license prior to the acquisition. The buyer of the divestiture assets will have the right to modify and improve both Premier products and the AutoMARK.” Thus, the Obama’s DOJ stripped ES&S not only acquired Premier assets, but also coerced it to license rights to its pre-merger product. “ES&S must sell the divestiture assets to a buyer approved by the department.” This is not selling. This is confiscation multiplied by corruption. “The settlement prohibits ES&S from bidding on new voting equipment system contracts using the Premier equipment. [transferred to Dominion]” Wait, didn’t they say that the purpose was to increase the competition? “The department also required that ES&S grant the divestiture buyer an opportunity to compete to provide services to Premier customers currently under contract with ES&S, giving customers the option to switch to the divestiture buyer or to remain with ES&S … ES&S also must provide access to knowledgeable Premier employees and agree to offer a supply agreement to allow the divestiture buyer time to establish its own manufacturing of voting equipment systems.” The approved divestiture buyer, Dominion Voting, is not mentioned in this press release. But this quote shows that the DOJ has already determined the “approved buyer,” and knew that it had no manufacturing base. After the “Sale” Dominion announced the acquisition of the Diebold products on May 19, 2010 [2] and the acquisition of Sequoia Voting assets on June 4, 2010 [3]. Dominion also hired much of its personnel, probably retaining ties to extremely sketchy Smartmatic. Sequoia/Smartmatic systems had been used in the Venezuela 2004 referendum, which Hugo Chavez “won”. Smartmatic is a British company with Hugo Chavez ties, headed by “Lord” Malloch-Brown (former UN Deputy Secretary-General, UNDP, UNHCR, VP of Soros’ Quantum Fund, and Vice Chair of Soros’ Open Society Foundation) [7], and linked to electoral scandals all over the world [5]. In August 2009 (corrected), the rough breakdown of the EVS market in the US was (per Brad Friedman): 40% ES&S 30% Diebold/Premier 20% Sequoia/Smartmatic 10% Hart Intercivic 0% Dominion Voting Less than a year later, after the “antitrust” actions of Obama’s DOJ, it became: 50% Dominion 40% ES&S (restricted in competing against Dominion) 10% Hart Intercivic Thus, the DOJ’s actions did the exact opposite of its words. An elections system vendor should be non-partisan, in a demonstrable way. Dominion is not just partisan, but hyper-partisan in favor of the Democrat party, or even its pocket vendor. Dominion has many more ties to the Democrat party and its prominent supporters in the US and abroad, which are not covered in this article. Software Development in Serbia Dominion develops much of its software in Belgrade, Serbia. Russia is a close friend to Serbia, if not its only one. If anybody sincerely thought that Putin wanted to hack American elections, their first location of interest would be the offices of Dominion Voting in Belgrade, rather than the Trump Tower in New York. By the way, Serbian and Russian languages use the Cyrillic alphabet. Most letters have the same Unicode encoding in Serbian and Russian (the Basic Multilingual Plane, range 0410-04FF). If any election officials found Cyrillic text on a Dominion voting machine in 2016, it was probably left by its developers in Serbia. Remarks This is the Agreement between Michigan & Dominion, including specs of many Dominion products (PDF, 161 pages). Wi-Fi connection and even a dial up modem are offered as an option. Some of the companies referenced here as foreign based or foreign originating re-registered in the US. Dominion Voting Systems Series Part I Part II (this) Part III [the above explains why Dominion is protected, in effect their are an arm of the federal government; John Populous, along with Obama The Foreigner, must be one of the first arrested and prosecuted] Some References [1] Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election Solutions Merger, http://justice.gov, March 8, 2010 [2] Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Acquires Premier Election Solutions Assets From ES&S, press release, May 19 [3] Dominion Voting Systems Corporation Acquires Assets of Sequoia Voting Systems, press release, June 4, 2010 [3b] On Heels of Diebold/Premier Purchase, Canadian Firm Also Acquires Sequoia, Lies About Chavez-Ties in Announcement – contemporary commentary [4] Marcos warns of ‘another Smartmatic situation’ – Smartmatic was accused of election fraud in the 2016 elections in Philippines [5] Smartmatic in Wikipedia, November 9, 2020 (not verified) [6] Sequoia Voting Systems in Wikipedia, November 9, 2020 (not verified) [7] “Lord” Malloch Brown in Wikipedia, November 8, 2010 (not verified) [8] Diebold Sells U.S. Elections Systems Business to ES&S, press release, September 3, 2009 [9] Dominion Voting Systems Corp – discussion of Dominion’s ideology and highly partisan offers [10] Dominion Voting Systems’ profile in Bloomberg

Department of Justice | Homepage | United States Department of JusticeLock Official website of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). DOJ’s mission is to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. justice.gov
Saved - October 10, 2024 at 12:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that Cradlepoint routers, which are part of ES&S and Dominion voting systems, are being imported from communist China, but routed through Taiwan to appear as if they come from there. This circumvents regulations requiring key components for critical infrastructure to be imported on US-flagged ships and sourced from friendly countries. George Mulhern, the former CEO of Cradlepoint, has ties to Ericsson, a company with a history of bribery and misconduct, which raises concerns about their involvement in our elections.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Cradlepoint routers illegally coming from communist China. Surprise ending. Cradlepoint routers are used in ES&S and Dominion voting systems. At the Election Management System (EMS) located at the counties. Images show Bills of Lading. Source: US govt. See how they are being sent to Taiwan first? This is to repackage them and get them onto a US-flagged ships. To make it seem like the Cradlepoint routers are coming from Taiwan instead. It is required key components going into critical infrastructure, which voting equipment is, according to the Dept. of Homeland Security, be imported on US-flagged ships. It is also required these key components be manufactured in friendly countries, NOT communist china. George Mulhern was the CEO and chairman of the board of Cradlepoint until his last day on October 31, 2023. Mulhern was also the Senior Vice President and Head of Business Area Enterprise Wireless Solutions at Ericsson Yep, that Ericsson, the company that paid bribes to the Taliban who killed our soldiers. Swedish telecom giant Ericsson agreed to plead guilty and pay a $206 million fine for breaching its deferred prosecution deal with U.S. authorities by withholding information about its alleged misconduct in Iraq and other countries. In 2019, Ericsson admitted to accusations of bribery and other wrongdoing in multiple countries and paid a record $1 billion fine under a deferred prosecution agreement struck with the U.S. Department of Justice. The deal allowed the company to avoid a criminal conviction but required it to report any potential wrongdoing and submit to the scrutiny of an outside monitor over a three-year period. But Ericsson has violated the deal twice since 2019. Their bribes directly caused the deaths of our US soldiers. Ericsson is deeply involved in our elections - a whole other story. Oh yeah, Ericsson purchased Cradlepoint in August of 2020. @EmeraldRobinson @PatrickByrne @BehizyTweets @nataliegwinters @elonmusk

Saved - October 1, 2024 at 3:36 AM

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Can Dominion Voting systems be accessed remotely? Answer: YES. Were Dominion Voting systems accessed remotely? YES. With real examples provided by the expert witness.

@GAballots - David Cross

Can the system be accessed remotely? Yes. https://t.co/SfvLMZCVsS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion can remotely connect to election systems without detection. This has occurred in instances such as the Denver, Colorado server, which was requested to grant access to Belgrade. It is unclear why Belgrade, possibly Belgrade, Montana, would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server for an election system. There were also background activities concerning the database and its configuration that lack an engineering change order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To your understanding, is Dominion able to remotely connect to these election systems? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Are they able to do that without detection? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And are you aware of any instances in which that has occurred? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Can you identify those instances? Speaker 1: One would be the Denver, Colorado server was granted or requested to grant Belgrade, only Belgrade. I did search. There is a Belgrade Montana. Again, why would Montana need to connect into a Colorado file transfer server as per election system? And there are other components and things that were done in the background concerning the database and the configure of the database server that still do not have an engineering change order. Because if somebody works in an
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 9:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am calling for the immediate resignation of US Senator Tammy Baldwin, accusing her of criminally laundering money into her campaign. The attached data from 2024 shows a significant increase in contributions, suggesting systematic money laundering over the years. Baldwin's actions mirror those of other politicians like Biden and Harris, impacting elections at all levels across the country. Additionally, there are multiple entities involved in this alleged smurfing, which I have detailed in previous tweets.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

I call for the immediate resignation of US Senator Tammy Baldwin for criminally laundering money into her campaign. Column 1 of attached image - Name Column 2 Number of Contributions Column 3 Dollar amount of those contributions Column 4 Lock-step increase in no. of contributions Column 5 Lock-step increase in $$$ contributions You are looking at proof of computerized criminal money laundering into her campaign. She has been doing it for years. The data in the image is from 2024. Baldwin has laundered millions into her campaign, just like Biden, Harris, and many others. This is being done in federal elections, to statewide races, mayoral races, and even school board races. Thus this affects every citizen in the USA. There are multiples of other entities Smurfing in addition to ActBlue. For some more see my tweets of July 27 and 28. @JamesOKeefeIII #Smurfing @SenatorBaldwin @TammyBaldwin @EmeraldRobinson @FEC @KenPaxtonTX @KenPaxtonAG @JasonMiyaresVA @WyomingSOS @AGAndrewBailey @AGAndrewBailey1 @Rasmussen_Poll @elonmusk @BehizyTweets @ickesCyberGB @glennbeck @SeanJCooksey @CannConActual @AsheinAmerica

Saved - August 12, 2024 at 4:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared an image of a Dominion Voting audit log, highlighting that the name of the user who adjudicated ballots is redacted. This raises concerns about transparency in public elections. The log originates from San Diego County, CA. I want to express my appreciation for Chris Gleason, who is running for Elections Supervisor in Pinellas County, FL. He and others have uncovered election cheating, including involvement from the Sheriff. The election is on August 20th, and I encourage donations to support his campaign.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Dominion Voting audit log image shown here - The UserName who adjudicated the ballots (meaning flipped votes cheating in an election) has their name redacted!! Cheating liar Dominion Voting president John Poulos allows his software code to be able to hide information from all of us. Isn't that just wonderful for public elections in the United States of America. The log is from San Diego County CA. Thanks goes out to Chris Gleason, people need to donate to his campaign. He is running for Elections Supervisor in Pinellas County, FL. http://www.gleasonforpinellas.com He and others there caught them red-handed cheating in elections, including the Sheriff...who was on the ballot! The election is August 20th, please donate today. #Dominion

Chris Gleason for Supervisor of Elections, Pinellas County Chris Gleason is running for Supervisor of Elections in Pinellas County. Discover his vision and plans for fair and efficient elections. Vote Chris Gleason for a transparent and accountable electoral process. gleasonforpinellas.com
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 6:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Pennsylvania, our TITAN system reveals concerning voter registration issues: thousands registered to commercial addresses, missing or incorrect unit numbers, invalid addresses, and more. This highlights the need to ban absentee mail-in voting to prevent misuse. Similar problems were found in Georgia and North Carolina. It seems like state officials and election clerks are failing to maintain clean voter registration lists, raising suspicions of intentional wrongdoing. Vote in person on election day to protect your ballot and maintain privacy. Share this information to expose election fraud.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

PENNSYLVANIA voter registrations run through our TITAN system: the worst we've seen! -Registered to a commercial address: 2,405 -Missing or wrong APT, STE, Unit #: 323,524 -Invalid address: 346,505 -Used Post Office Physical Address: 240 -Registration occurred on a fed holiday: 315,517 -Moved, left no forwarding address: 27,672 -Permanently moved out of state: 262,488 -Permanently moved to a new county: 169,083 (within Pennsylvania) Total: 1,420,435 This is why absentee mail-in voting must be banned. Bad people can use these registrations to cast ballots using the names and addresses of others. And there are more than the 1,420,435—we're not even showing all our outputs. We published Georgia's numbers below on July 15th and North Carolina's on July 10th. This is a complete failure by state level election officials, election clerks and ERIC in keeping our voter reg. lists clean. Almost like they are doing it on purpose......bingo. Vote in person on election day. Don't let the bad guys steal your ballot. Nor allow them to know who and how many are voting. Get this to anyone at the RNC Convention, to any place you can get it published. Your seeing a key part of the election fraud when viewing these numbers as dirty rolls = dirty elections. @EmeraldRobinson @hoopes_leah #electionfraud

Saved - May 11, 2024 at 4:42 PM

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

"Republican" Robin Vos is directly connected to the communist party of China, to Hunter Biden (laptop emails), to Whitey Bulger's nephew, i.e., the Mob. See Press Release, hear it from Garrett Ziegler on Reg. Joe Show's Podcast. https://wtaq.com/shows-regular-joe-show/ start at 19:00min in

Shows | The Regular Joe Show Weekdays, 9:00am-11am wtaq.com
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 12:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Dominion Voting systems use computer motherboards made in a Chinese plant near Beijing, which violates U.S. government regulations. The motherboards are crucial components that contain various elements necessary for the system's functioning. Using Chinese parts in critical infrastructure is illegal and goes against federal FISMA regulations. More information can be found in the author's tweets, which include emails from Dominion Voting.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

The computer motherboards in the Dominion Voting systems are made in a Chinese plant 60 miles outside Beijing. All suppliers shipping material to support a U.S. Government program must comply with DFARS 252.247-7023. All cargo intended for a US Government contract must be shipped on a U.S. flag ocean vessel with no exception. The rated bill of lading must be sent to MARAD and the Contracting Officer within 7 days of the vessel sailing from the port of origin. A rated bill of lading is an ocean bill of lading from the ocean carrier (not an agent) that contains the cost of the freight transportation. All this is not happening. From team member. A typical motherboard contains the CPU, memory, storage, ROM BIOS, chipsets, cooling fans, peripheral connector slots, connectors for peripheral devices, the battery backup and the power connector. It is illega to use communist Chinese parts such as a motherboard in critical infrastructure. It violates federal FISMA for one. Much more on corrupt Dominion Voting in my Tweets below, from their own emails.

Saved - April 23, 2024 at 10:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The City of Milwaukee has signed a contract with Konnech for their Poll Chief Software. However, concerns have been raised about Konnech CEO Eugene Yu's ties to the Chinese Communist Party. LA's government case prosecutor found evidence that Konnech had shared personally identifiable information of poll workers with China. Despite this, Milwaukee proceeded with the contract, potentially exposing themselves to major lawsuits. #Konnech

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

EXCLUSIVE: City of Milwaukee has a signed contract with Konnech for their Poll Chief Software. 3 images here, of the 94 page contract, more coming. Konnech CEO Eugene Yu works for the Chinese Communist Party. LA's govt. case prosecutor, Mr. Eric Neff, found for 100% certainty Konnech gave the poll workers personally identifiable information to China. From The Federalist: "From a legal perspective, the dismissal of the criminal charges was baffling, as the criminal complaint filed against Yu stated that during the execution of a search warrant at Konnech, the government recovered evidence that employees had 'sent personal identifying information of Los Angeles County election workers to third-party software developers who assisted with the creating and fixing [of] Konnech’s internal ‘PollChief’ software.' The criminal complaint further stated that a project manager for Konnech’s contract with L.A. County 'confirmed via the messaging app DingTalk that any employee for Chinese contractors working on PollChief software had ‘superadministrative’ privileges for all PollChief clients.'” and "according to Neff, that 'Konnech was sending sensitive [Personal Identifying Information] data to Chinese-owned and operated third-party contractors through Chinese-owned and operated messaging applications.'” Where they city of Milwaukee KNEW the CEO of Konnech was charged with crimes, and knew or should have known their poll workers' personally identifiable information was turned over to the Chinese - sitting on Chinese servers, yet still proceeded. The city of Milwaukee has no idea of how exposed they are right now to major lawsuits, wow, just wow! 3 images here - #Konnech @EmeraldRobinson @TrueTheVote @BehizyTweets @BreannaMorello @pepesgrandma @ConradsonJordan @KanekoaTheGreat @MarcoPolo501c3 @Rasmussen_Poll #PollChief

Saved - April 11, 2024 at 9:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Attorney Jesse Binnall testified on election fraud involving Dominion Voting machines before the US Senate. He highlighted the use of Dominion machines, Runbeck software, and KNOWinK software in Clark County, Nevada. Binnall also mentioned a 101-page report on vote flipping, available on the website http://www.electionwatch.info.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Attorney Jesse Binnall testified before the US Senate on election fraud by Dominion Voting machines; a 39-second video of him is in the upper left of the post below. Key: Clark County Nevada uses Dominion voting machines, Runbeck software and services, KNOWinK software. Runbeck has the patented software which outright shows they flip votes, see our 101 page report on this on the website. http://www.electionwatch.info

Election Watch Election Watch Info is a non-profit organization that aims to promote transparency, integrity, and accountability in elections worldwide. They provide comprehensive coverage and analysis of electoral processes, from pre-election preparations to post-election developments, with a particular focus on issues such as voter access, election security, and disinformation. Election Watch Info also offers tools and resources for monitoring and reporting on elections, including a database of election-related news and a platform for crowdsourced election monitoring. They collaborate with local and international partners, including election management bodies, civil society organizations, and academic institutions, to support election observation and advocacy efforts. Through their work, Election Watch Info seeks to enhance the credibility and legitimacy of electoral processes and to empower citizens to participate in the democratic process. electionwatch.info

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, why the Trump campaign was denied to forensically examine the Dominion voting machines in 2020 and being prosecuted and persecuted after the overthrown of your government, “Two Clark County technical employees came forward completely independent of each other and explained that they discovered that the number of votes recorded by Dominion voting machines stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed at night and when they were reopened the next morning.” “In other words votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns about fraud with Dominion Voting Machines due to security vulnerabilities. In Georgia, people are fighting to remove them from elections. A computer scientist showed how easy it is to manipulate the machines in court. There are worries about internet connectivity and foreign access to the machines. Dominion is suing those who accused them of cheating in the 2020 election, but facing challenges in court. Emails suggest foreign nationals accessed US voting machines. Questions remain about the security and integrity of Dominion Voting Machines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is surprising about this whole settlement is that there continues to be concern about fraud with Dominion Voting Machines. In fact, the US government issued a warning about Dominion Voting Machines in June 2022. SAISA, the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency issued this press release saying that Dominion Voting Machines had security vulnerabilities that could be exploited. People are so outraged over this that the people in Georgia have been fighting in court to remove the use of Dominion Voting Machines from their elections on the basis that they're not secure. In January 2024, a computer scientist demonstrated in court how he could manipulate a Dominion Voting machine using only a pen, a fake $10 voter card, or a $100 USB device In a matter of seconds, he could rig the machine to print out as many ballots as he wanted I'm going to explain how you fake a Dominion Voting Machine This is all public information anyone can find on the Internet You take a pen and you insert it into the power button on the back of the machine and you hold it down for 5 seconds. This reboots the machine in safe mode and gives you super user access. This gives you unlimited ability to manipulate data on the machine. Now, I don't know what you think, but to me, it sounds like these machines are not very secure. Now you might argue that all these machines have audit logs. So if someone tried to manipulate the votes, wouldn't you just see it in the audit logs? However, if you are a super user, you can delete the audit logs. Also, you can program all of these steps into a technician card. You insert the card and it runs the program in seconds. Just so you understand this, any random person can walk in off the street and very easily and quickly change the vote count from any voting machine. Why are we using these in our elections? But hold on. It gets worse. That example would just be one voting machine in one location. There's also a vulnerability if these machines are connected to the internet The machines run on a version of Microsoft Windows from 2015 There are some well known malware hacks that can access the system through the internet If the malware infected the right file it could change the votes in every Dominion Voting machine in the county It could also delete itself once it was done Even if the machines were not connected to the internet, someone could infect the system simply by inserting a USB device. Why are we using these machines in our elections? But hold on. It gets worse. Dominion is continuing to sue people who accuse them of cheating in the 2020 elections. But unlike Fox News, these other defendants are fighting back. Dominion is suing Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell, Patrick Byrne, the CEO of Overstock, and Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow. All of these cases have been filed in democrat courts in Washington DC. But even with biased judges and juries, these cases are gonna be incredibly difficult for Dominion to win. They have to prove that these people were all intentionally lying when they claimed the 2020 election was stolen. I don't think anyone seriously doubts that these people actually believe the 2020 election was stolen. The case against Patrick Byrne is currently in discovery. The discovery uncovered multiple emails internal to Dominion that raised significant questions about the company. Patrick's attorney is Stephanie Lambert. She turned the emails over to sheriff Darleaf as evidence Dominion committed crimes during the 2020 election. Sheriff Darleaf sent this letter to congress requesting an immediate investigation. He says the emails show that foreign nationals have accessed electronic voting machines in Michigan and other states. What he is referring to is this email Dominion has offices in Serbia This is an email chain of Dominion staff in Serbia talking about running a test on Colorado voting machines They are going to connect to the machines and vote I quote Let's try and run the whole test for the Colorado project and full face ballot by voting Why do Serbians have the ability to log into US voting machines and vote? This is especially troubling because Dominion has always tried to combat accusations about their voting machine vulnerabilities by claiming that the machines are not connected to the Internet. Well, if they're not connected, how are the Serbians logging in? In fact, here is the CEO of Dominion testifying under oath that there are no modems in Dominion machines that can connect them to the Internet. And so are those networked? Is the computer then networked directly to the tabulator on a local area network?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Systems are closed networks, not connected to the internet. Dominion denies remote access to machines. Claims of modems in Alaska voting machines contradict EAC certification. Allegations of fraud and perjury against Dominion CEO. Fox News settlement could be overturned if fraud is proven.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Systems are designed to be, closed network, which means, they are connected to each other in a local area network, but they are not designed to be connected to the outside world through either an Internet connection or any other, external connect connectivity device. Speaker 1: Does Dominion have any way to remotely access any of the information on any of the equipment or have remote access within the machines themselves? No. So there is no modem at all in these machines? Speaker 0: The only modem is the one that I described, that is has a very, very particular function on the precinct, and we do not have access to it and nor can we modem into that machine. Speaker 1: Does anybody have Speaker 2: Dominion employees, foreign nationals who are talking about accessing the voting equipment. The CEO is committing perjury here, but it's even worse than that. Here's a certification from the EAC, the US Election Assistance Commission. They are the organization that has certified Dominion Voting Machines for US elections. In this document, the use of modems to connect to the Internet is marked no. If this is not correct and Dominion is using modems to connect the voting machines to the Internet, that means they lied to the EAC. This is another email from Dominion Employees talking about voting machines in Alaska. They say the remaining 304 in Alaska were retrofitted with dial up modems and received in all 5 regional offices. Why is Dominion putting modems in the Alaska voting machines? This not only means that the CEO lied under oath about the modems, it means that Dominion lied to the EAC, and it means that Dominion has lied under oath in every single lawsuit against Fox News, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell, Patrick Byrne, and Mike Lindell. Not only that, consider all of the money Dominion has made off of taxpayer dollars Dominion would have gone through a procurement process based on their EAC certification. That means they also lied about the modems to obtain enormous amounts of taxpayer dollars. That is evidence of fraud. So I will ask again, why are we using any of these machines in the upcoming election? Again, I'm not even addressing the issue of whether Dominion cheated in the 2020 election. I am saying that there is evidence that they are committing fraud right now. Just so you understand what this means, Fox News paid Dominion $787,500,000 in their settlement. If Dominion lied to get that settlement and if Fox News has lawyers that are any good, they can ask that the settlement be overturned because of fraud. And Fox News can ask for all their money back.
Saved - March 12, 2024 at 7:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi has been linked to Dominion Voting, the company accused of rigging the 2020 election. An email reveals that a partner from a private intel group, where Pelosi's assistant works, is copied. The President of Dominion Voting is also seen emailing Belgrade, Serbia. More details to come in Part 1 of 3.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

EXCLUSIVE: Nancy Pelosi strongly connected to Dominion Voting company rigging the 2020 election. See email first - Dominion is caught (see Sheriff Leaf's affidavit further below, and Attorney Lambert's court filing this morning) cheating in the 2020 election in Michigan. In the email is copied dominion@hamiltonps.com Hamilton Place Services is one of those private intel groups - where Stacy Kerr is a Partner. Stacy Kerr is Special Assistant To Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (at that time in 2020). See Kerr's Bio attached here. Why is one of Pelosi's top people on an email of private company Dominion Voting? Why is the President of Dominion even emailing Belgrade Serbia? Look what the President of Dominion Voting types "Keep sending local [Belgrade] news to the Hamilton team so they have awareness". Wait till we get to K2 on that email below :) Part 1 of 3.

Saved - January 21, 2024 at 12:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The WSJ article is incorrect about Trump losing Wisconsin. Evidence shows he won. Apologies for the delay in sharing the evidence. Some counties used modems, but Brown County did not. However, there was suspicious activity in Green Bay involving Mark Spitzer Rubenstein. He had a private router line and received real-time election results. Rubenstein was not authorized to be there and the city clerk of Green Bay, Celeste Jefferies, is corrupt. Robin Vos covered it up. The WSJ should stop spreading lies about the 2020 election.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

The WSJ article is wrong - Trump won Wisconsin and we have the evidence. My fault for not getting it out sooner, swamped with work. Back to the article: clarifying by chance Brown County (Green Bay) ES&S machines were ordered without the modems. 30 other counties out of our 72 counties do use modems, most wireless ones, some are analog. However, Justice Gableman is correct that nefarious activity did take place in Green Bay with Mark Spitzer Rubenstein. Here are photos of him on Nov.3, 202 in Green Bay's central count. In advance he had the KI Convention Center, where the count took place, run him a private router line from the floor up to his 8th floor hotel room. He was receiving election results in real time, from a technician who worked the KI Convention Center. And why, in a central counting room on election day was Rubenstein on a laptop? Let's all do that - take your laptops to central counts this coming November. He was not authorized to be there, just a private citizen from Brooklyn, NY. Earlier on he had a name tag stating he was a city employee - he never was. The city clerk of Green Bay is very corrupt, Celeste Jefferies. She is still there. It was directly Robin Vos who covered this all up as Justice Gableman has a subpoena with Rubenstein's name on it - Robin Vos shut the investigation down. To WSJ - stop lying about 2020, so much has come out across the nation you look like fools.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"In Green Bay, Mr. Gableman claims, ES&S machines “were connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point.” ES&S disputes almost every syllable. “Green Bay voting machines have no wireless connection capability,” the company says. Elsewhere in Wisconsin, ES&S scanners use modems to transmit unofficial results on election night. Yet they “do not connect to the public internet, but instead use private network configurations specifically designed for high-security applications.” The final, official tallies later “are physically uploaded at election headquarters.” "The Republican Plot to Lose Wisconsin in 2022" - https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-republican-plot-to-lose-wisconsin-in-2022-michael-gableman-2020-election-report-11646433322

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 11:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Smurfing: a sophisticated scam where individuals use multiple names to make identical donations from different states, enabling campaign money laundering. This tactic allows liberals to amass funds beyond Republicans' reach. RNC must wake up and address this issue. Check out my tweets on political campaign money laundering for more details. Read the lead story in The EPOCH Times or visit www.electionwatch.info for donations. Thank you for your support.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Smurfing: showing how sophisticated these bad guys are; pick any name on the list shown below and we found the same "person" in several different states. We can tell because the donations are in the same amount, the same day, the same minute, the same name, but from numerous states. A similar way as the corrupt ERIC and liar David Becker is moving voters around. Please help us fight this worldwide scam of smurfing, i.e. campaign money laundering. This is how the liberals are filling the coffers way beyond what the Republicans could ever hope to do. Wake up RNC - it is impossible for you to raise more money than the liberals. You can't even match them. Ask yourself why, maybe you'll find it in my tweets ABOUT POLITICAL CAMPAIGN MONEY LAUNDERING (hint). See the lead story in the national paper The EPOCH Times in the tweet below - donations at www.electionwatch dot info thank you for the support.

Saved - September 14, 2023 at 3:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Janet Protasiewicz, a candidate for the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, is accused of various crimes including money laundering, fraud, and conspiracy. Her campaign allegedly received illegal donations, scamming millions from unsuspecting citizens, particularly senior citizens. Both Democrats and Republicans are involved, but to a lesser extent. The corruption extends to the state Democrat party and several Democrat county parties. The article also questions Josh Kaul's involvement and raises concerns about the Dominion and ESS computer source codes. The RNC and RPW's focus seems to be on fundraising rather than addressing these issues.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

We are removing Janet Protasiewicz from the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. We have caught her campaign, Janet For Justice, committing crimes of Smurfing (structured money laundering), wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, computer fraud and abuse, and conspiring to defraud the federal government just to name a few. Not to mention scamming all of us with her fraudulent campaign funded by illegal donations. It's in the millions. But the worst: they used our senior citizens, our elderly, to carry out their scheme. The state Democrat party of Wisconsin is in on it, along with several Democrat county parties here also. Some Republicans are doing the same, but to a lesser degree, not that it makes it right by any means. More about Smurfing on our website. A special thank you to Chris Gleason for the untold hours of dedication on this project, and the others who put their lives on hold to expose this massive corruption. Josh Kaul - you're up next you crook. I have the documents Kaul. And, tell us all what did you do with the Dominion and ES&S computer source codes when you got them? And where is the RNC and RPW on this? Oh that's right, raising more money to put out lawn signs. http://electionwatch.info

View Full Interactive Feed