TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Project_Veritas
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Candace has been a target of governments for years. “We need to blackmail her (Candace) faster” - Mary Barr Daly, former senior DOJ official, daughter of former AG Bill Barr https://t.co/XFGnRGUqsl
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently uncovered alarming details surrounding the Eastern District of Virginia. A number linked to recently fired prosecutor Michael Ben’Ary expressed violent wishes towards President Trump and Lindsay Halligan in leaked texts. Ben’Ary's dismissal is framed as politically motivated, with Project Veritas revealing a history of threats and corruption in the district. Additionally, there are claims of a cover-up involving former AG Bill Barr. As Trump prepares to replace US Attorney Eric Siebert, threats against whistleblowers continue, raising serious concerns about misconduct within the DOJ.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Number Linked to Newly Fired U.S. Prosecutor Michael Ben’Ary Dreams President Trump and Eastern District of Virginia Attorney Lindsay Halligan Will Die "I would like to strangle that b*itch myself. Every night I dream that this nightmare will end ... or that she or @RealDonaldTrump would simply die." In a leaked text from October 6th, a number linked to Ben'Ary, who was terminated last week, urges fellow @EDVAnews prosecutor Russell Carlberg - previously exposed by Veritas for threatening whistleblowers - to "keep monitoring" cases to prevent interference from President Trump’s new appointee, Lindsay Halligan, who oversees the Comey case.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Ben’Ary and legacy media have portrayed his firing as politically driven. He taped this letter outside his former office last Friday. Project Veritas previously exposed scandals in the Eastern District of Virginia, including: - Former AG Bill Barr using @EDVAnews allies to target a whistleblower who reported him and @ARightSide to the FBI for an illegal visa scheme - A number linked to U.S. prosecutor Russell Carlberg sent death threats to the whistleblower as recently as 2 weeks ago stating: “I can do whatever the hell I want with you… may you and Trump share the same fate as [Charlie] Kirk.” - Former EDVA Attorney Jessica Aber, who warned the whistleblower of internal corruption, died unexpectedly in her sleep weeks later
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@EDVAnews https://t.co/yZgDrHejWH
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
The Eastern District of Virginia is where justice goes to die. https://t.co/quc9f27HRP
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@EDVAnews https://t.co/BgfnketG50
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨EXCLUSIVE: Trump Officials Hide Veritas' Patricia Lelis Investigation from Trump, Trump to Fire US Attorney in Charge “Trump has realized that something suspicious is going on in Virginia” ABC News reports @RealDonaldTrump will fire US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA (@EDVAnews) Eric Siebert for failing to bring charges against Leticia James for mortgage fraud. A DOJ insider tells Veritas there's more to the story: Siebert, overseeing the Patricia Lelis case, misled Trump about his knowledge - evidence from Veritas confirms this. *RECAP: Lelis reported former AG Bill Barr's alleged visa fraud scheme to the FBI; months later, she was charged. DOJ official came to Veritas concerned that Barr was using DOJ/FBI connections to target Lelis. Why is the government still shielding Bill Barr?
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@EDVAnews https://t.co/rzBuvly2lD
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨 Number linked to US Attorney Russell Carlberg in Eastern District of Virginia issues DEATH THREATS to President Trump & Project Veritas Whistleblower Patricia Lélis! “I can do whatever the hell I want with you… may you and @realDonaldTrump share the same fate as [Charlie] Kirk.” Corruption rages on in @EDVAnews - as Trump fires US Attorney Eric Siebert & replaces him with Lindsey Halligan, this indicted whistleblower gets ANOTHER threat from her prosecutor. Now it targets POTUS himself. CC: @SecretService
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@EDVAnews https://t.co/nw456ywtlh
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Dear @TheJusticeDept & @EDVANews: What are the potential prison terms and disbarment consequences for a U.S. Prosecutor engaged in: - Criminal Threats/Extortion - Witness Tampering - Obstruction of Justice - Federal Stalking/Harassment https://t.co/zMrmTOaYH8
reSee.it AI Summary
I just found out that Facebook and Instagram removed our video where we confronted the YouTube VP of Trust & Safety, claiming it violated their privacy standards. They've even threatened to restrict and disable our accounts. Here's the video they took down.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING: @Facebook and @Instagram have just REMOVED our video confronting @YouTube VP of Trust & Safety saying it was a violation of “Community Standards” on “Privacy” and have threatened to restrict and disable our accounts https://t.co/WIUBD32tEf
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Here is the video they removed https://t.co/ktvXRJawN2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas, asks Matt Halperin, YouTube’s global head of trust and safety, why they banned our Pfizer director video about mutating viruses. The tape includes: 'Don't tell anyone what this is. We gotta publish your time. We gotta publish your own time.' 'Right? How much is Pfizer paying you to run cover for them? Is YouTube brought to us by Pfizer?' He states: 'Matt, millions of people are gonna see this videotape, and they're gonna see your cowardice.' 'YouTube just took down our Pfizer expose. YouTube gave us a strike and will not let us post for a week.' The confrontation continues: 'Is the is the global head of trust and safety threatening me?' It ends with: 'Matt Halperin, global head of trust and safety brought to you by Pfizer. Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas.' 'You touched me. That's not something you wanna do.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Matt? Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas. Why did you ban our videotape of a Pfizer director talking about mutating viruses?
Speaker 1: Don't tell anyone what this is. We gotta publish your time. We gotta publish your own time.
Speaker 2: We're restoring, like, no you know
Speaker 1: how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate ourselves so we can put the we can create unequally developing vaccines.
Speaker 0: Right? How much is Pfizer paying you to run cover for them? Is YouTube brought to us by Pfizer? Matt, you're the global head of trust and safety at YouTube. Why don't you trust the public with a matter that absolutely concerns their safety?
Matt, millions of people are gonna see this videotape, and they're gonna see your cowardice. They're going to see your absolute contempt for the public trust, and they're gonna see your absolute disregard for public safety. Are you sure this is how you wish to portray yourself? Matt, be brave. Say something.
How much ad revenue does YouTube take in from Pfizer? How much was at stake? A Pfizer director talking about mutating viruses.
Speaker 2: I'm like, no. You know how
Speaker 1: the virus keeps mutating? Why don't we just mutate it ourselves?
Speaker 0: And you don't want the American public or the world to know about it. YouTube just took down our Pfizer expose. YouTube gave us a strike and will not let us post for a week. Why not? Do you have any ethical responsibility to the American people, to the world?
Why does the public not deserve to see that videotape?
Speaker 3: You touched me. That's not something you wanna do.
Speaker 0: Is that a threat? Are you threatening me? Is the is the global head of trust and safety threatening me?
Speaker 3: No. I said I'd call the police if you you accost me.
Speaker 0: Why? I'm I I didn't touch you, Matt.
Speaker 3: Yes, you did.
Speaker 0: Matt Halperin, global head of trust and safety brought to you by Pfizer. Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Please tell us more. @Arightside “You took my documents and phones and never returned them. Now you think you can move against me? Let me be clear, your time is running out… Letting you live was one of the biggest mistakes I’ve ever made." https://t.co/gTVVr8qDY0
@Arightside - Armstrong Williams 🇺🇸
Delusions should not be dignified by a response. Project Veritas has become Project Falsitas ignoring the truth for likes & views. That story erupted like Mount Vesuvius 🌋 pouring forth lies to bury enlightened journalism. Patricia Leís Bolin takes Pinocchio to a new level. https://t.co/rouRoqgTrF
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
‼️Texts, notes, and emails EXPOSE @FultonCountyDA Fani Willis and Bill Barr worked together on the RICO case targeting @RealDonaldTrump! https://t.co/649Ptlp8lH
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared alarming revelations about Bill Barr's secret meetings aimed at prosecuting Trump to hinder his political return. Whistleblower Patrícia Lélis highlighted Barr's strategy to use difficult charges like RICO. Armstrong Williams expressed frustration over the handling of his documents and warned that time is running out for those involved. I also called for investigations into Barr's actions, questioning why others aren't taking action. Lastly, I encouraged a friend to examine the evidence presented.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING PART TWO: Bill Barr Held Secret Meetings to Plot Prosecutions of Trump and Block His Political Comeback “Bill Barr was like, ‘We should bring RICO because it's a very difficult type of charge to defend.’” - Patrícia Lélis, Whistleblower “You took my documents and phones and never returned them. Now you think you can move against me? Let me be clear, your time is running out… Letting you live was one of the biggest mistakes I’ve ever made.” - Armstrong Williams, (@ARightSide)
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims they are being prosecuted for reporting Bill Barr and Armstrong Williams. They have notes from meetings about topics ranging from visas to January 6 and RICO cases. Barr allegedly believed the FBI would soon raid Trump's house and was focused on preventing Trump from holding office again.
Barr allegedly suggested pursuing a recall charge against Trump because it is difficult to defend. Williams is described as having powerful friends like Barr and Ben Carson, using his connections to resolve issues. The speaker recalls a meeting with Fani Willis, who presented herself as close to Williams.
Meetings allegedly focused on preventing Trump from regaining power. One meeting at Sinclair Broadcast introduced the speaker to Jack Smith and the January 6 investigation. Facebook allegedly provided direction on creating anti-Trump content. A meeting including Barr discussed investigating January 6, targeting figures like Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, and Roger Stone. Williams, despite portraying himself as a patriotic Republican, allegedly met with Barr to plan against Trump and those involved in January 6. The speaker alleges Williams was inside Capitol Hill on January 6 but was protected due to his connections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's very easy to know why I am being prosecuted and no one else is being charged or prosecuted. It's very easy. I called the FBI to report Bill Barr and Armstrong Williams. I have notes of every single meeting. One meeting can be about visa for someone, or another meeting can be about January 6 or RICO case.
I have a quote here that was like Barr believes the FBI will go to Trump house soon. And one thing that I heard a lot is like how they go to prevent America to have Trump again. One thing that I learned very fast and very in the beginning is like, Bill Barr is someone extremely important. And I remember the like, the biggest conversation they had at that point, it is like, what kind of charge that we can bring against Trump? And that's when Bill Barr, and I I will never forgot that, Bill Barr was like, we should bring a recall because it's a very difficult, type of charge to defend.
Armstrong has these powerful friends. He's friends with like Bill Barr, he's friends with Ben Carson, he's friend with the mayor of DC, and he has like all this list of powerful people and people like with a lot of money. I know they do some business together. All the time Armstrong needs something he calls Bilbar. Like can be for example approve a visa for someone, he calls Bilbar.
Or for example, do some kind of lobbying with, for example, Turkish Airlines, he calls Bilbar. Bilbar is like the person that we call to resolve any kind of problems or situations. I have notes of every single meeting. One meeting can be about visa for someone, or another meeting can be about January 6 or RICO case. In 02/27/20023, here's my notes, they launched this meeting about RICO case.
I do not know if they have meetings before about that. That was the first time that I heard and that I learned about that. So they bring that case against Trump, and I remember the like, the biggest conversation they had at that point, it is like, kind of charts that we can bring against Trump. And they discussed like few charges under American law and that's when Bill Barr, and I I will never forgot that, Bill Barr was like, we should bring recall because it's a very difficult type of charge to defend. Bill Barr was like very focused in bringing the recall case because he explained to Fanuelis the recall charge is one of the most hard to defend in court because under the American law, the recall charge can be anything.
Like, it's not very specific. So, people who is charged with recall case, they have a very hard time to defend themselves. We had this meeting with Fenny Willis. At that point, I didn't have idea about her, what she'd work with. I don't I just don't know her.
And she present herself as, like, someone who's close to Armstrong, someone who's attorney. And all the time I was like, okay, it's just like one more meeting that we had. And then in these meetings, that's when I started to take notes and, like, try to keep everything that to prove that what's going on. One thing that I understood very well is like Bill Barr and Armstrong and all the politicians too, they're very focused like in how they go to stop Trump. And one thing that I heard a lot is like how they go to prevent America to have Trump again.
So in my views of politics, what I think it is, they probably realized very soon that if Trump runs again, he probably will won the election as he did. So in that point, they just wanna like prevent that. One of these meetings, for example, was launched in 03/15/20022. And this meeting was at Sinclair Broadcast. And this meeting was when I, like, started to learn more about, and about some guy called Jack Smith and about investigation, involving January 6.
I have a quote here that was like Barr believes the FBI will raise, and I put it in parenthesis, go, to Trump House soon. That's when it was like, I start to learn and to be sure about what they're doing. It was like they're planning and they create crimes and situations to go after everyone. In that meeting, we also spoke about the meeting that we had with Facebook. And the person in Facebook was helping us and giving us direction to create content against Trump and against the January sequence called Daniele.
That was, like, one of the first meetings that I had about this plan they had to go after everyone who works or support Trump, and that was back in 09/13/20021. So in this meeting was me, Armstrong, Sher Michael, and Bill Barr by phone, and they spoke about January 6 committee. They authorized the committee to investigate the events about January 6. We started, like, with some names. They also gave a lot of names here.
We have, like, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, Roddy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark, Oath Keepers, Proud Boy people, Proud Boy group, Scott Perry, Jordan, a group called Stop They Steal, Brad, again, Haf Hafes Bergen, Seamus, Ruby Freeman, Patrice Cipolloni, Alex Jones, Nick Fuentz, and we have some target people, which is like the people they wanna target more. And there was like Stuart Rhodes and Roger Stone. And here I have a quote. It was like Bart and Cheney once folks at Roger Stone Road in Tarrio and Benin. And also in Kimberly Guilford who is close to Trump.
Armstrong goes on TV or he goes on social media or he goes over his Twitter account or ex account. And he claims he's Republican. He's this person who is like extremely patriotic. He love his country and everything. But at the same time, he was lunch meetings with Bill Barr to plan against Trump and against people involved in January 6.
Armstrong never never got caught for things that he does. He was inside of the Capitol Hill in January 6. And then I started to understand he's never caught for that because he's friend with the mayor of DC, he was friend with the chief of police of DC. I'm talking about people who went to jail. And these people, they have families, they have lives.
Some people like with cancer, I know a case like with cancer, the person got arrested and went to jail because of January 6. But at the same time those people are there because people like Armstrong was telling them to be there. Was telling them like no, it's completely fine if we be here. And when the things start to happen over there, Armstrong is like, no, we can go inside and let's just do this. So what kind of person does that with people?
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
A whistleblower has provided Project Veritas with explosive evidence of secret meetings orchestrated by former U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr to prosecute Donald Trump and prevent his political comeback. FULL REPORT with notes, emails, and texts: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/part-2-former-attorney-general-bill-barr-bill-barr-held-secret-meetings-to
Part 2: Former Attorney General Bill Barr Bill Barr Held Secret Meetings to Plot Prosecutions of Trump Block His Political Comeback | Project Veritas
A whistleblower has provided Project Veritas with explosive evidence of secret meetings orchestrated by former U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr to…
projectveritas.com
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@JoanOfArc287 @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash They should help, but...
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@dogecointang Dude, thanks for the concern. Care to look at the evidence now? https://www.projectveritas.com/news/part-2-former-attorney-general-bill-barr-bill-barr-held-secret-meetings-to
Part 2: Former Attorney General Bill Barr Bill Barr Held Secret Meetings to Plot Prosecutions of Trump Block His Political Comeback | Project Veritas
A whistleblower has provided Project Veritas with explosive evidence of secret meetings orchestrated by former U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr to…
projectveritas.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared breaking news about a Secret Service agent, Marc Hendrickson, who invited Project Veritas to the White House while disparaging President Trump. Text messages reveal he disclosed operational details and a photo from the White House grounds, highlighting a serious security breach. This incident raises concerns about the Secret Service's commitment to protecting the President and maintaining trust. I noted that the agency has not yet commented on the situation.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING: Project Veritas Invited to @WhiteHouse by @SecretService Agent Exposing Reckless Security Breach One Year After Trump Assassination Attempt [@realDonaldTrump is] “doing a lot of wacky shit right now.” “I’m in protection, I travel with protectees and provide access control...” "I can show you where I am right now for work..."
Video Transcript AI Summary
This Sunday marks one year since the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Secret Service agents were suspended without pay following the incident. The disciplinary action took place in February.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This Sunday marks one year since the assassination attempt on president Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Big secret service agents were suspended without pay following the incident. The disciplinary action took place in February.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Text messages show U.S. @SecretService Agent Marc Hendrickson inviting a stranger to the White House, sharing a photo from the @WhiteHouse grounds, disclosing operational details, and disparaging his protectee, President Donald J. Trump. Evidence reveals a continued and dangerous lapse in the Secret Service’s sacred commitment to be “Worthy of Trust and Confidence.”
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
U.S. Secret Service Agent Marc Hendrickson Invites Project Veritas to the @WhiteHouse, Disparages Commander-in-Chief while on Duty Protecting @POTUS, @FLOTUS, and Cabinet Members. The @SecretService has not yet responded to comment. https://t.co/X8zi3RkcfF
reSee.it AI Summary
In my posts, I reveal a troubling situation involving a Connecticut pastor and youth director who are secretly guiding kids toward gender transitions without parental consent. There are alarming comments suggesting a disregard for parents' awareness, and even a willingness to bypass legal age restrictions on providing breast binders. The tone of the conversations indicates a covert approach to influencing minors, raising serious ethical concerns about the role of adults in these decisions.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING🚨 WITHOUT CONSENT Part 1: Connecticut Pastor, Youth Director, Secretly Steer Kids Toward Gender Transition, Defying Parents “Between me and you, and this is not being recorded… I can’t know that they [the parents] don’t know…. wink wink, nod, nod." "We give away free [breast] binders. They’re supposed to be for 18+ because legally that’s what we have to do. But we can always give one to Reverend Miller and see what he does with it. Whatever he does with it is none of my business. You know what I’m saying?"
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Project Veritas investigation was launched after a mother reported concerns about transgender activists. The investigation focuses on Reverend Aaron Miller, a transgender pastor, and transgender life coach Tony Faraiolo, who advocate for transgender youth in Connecticut.
Project Veritas investigated how far some activists may go to promote transgender transitions for children without parental consent. Faraiolo said they give away free chest binders, though legally they are supposed to be for 18+, and suggested giving one to Reverend Miller for a minor.
During an initial call, a 12-year-old, Justin, was introduced to Reverend Miller by a Project Veritas journalist. Justin expressed a desire for puberty blockers and top surgery. Faraiolo offered to help Justin get what he needs, suggesting that Justin could be brought to youth group meetings without his parents' knowledge. Both Miller and Faraiolo expressed no concern about providing a binder to Justin without parental approval, despite the associated health risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A mother's tip to Project Veritas sparked an investigation into a network of transgender activists. Falsely accused of abuse after her daughter had one meeting with Reverend Aaron Miller, she feared for others. Miller, a transgender pastor, collaborates with transgender life coach Tony Faraiolo to advocate for transgender youth in Connecticut. Through a series of meetings with the pair, Project Veritas probes how far some activists may go to promote transgender transitions for children without parental consent.
Speaker 1: Between me and you, this is not being recorded. I can't know that they don't know. Everyone's like, wink wink. Don't know how many people we should share that they their parents don't know. Do you have a binder?
Do you bind? Do you bind your chest? Because we give away free binders. They're supposed to be for 18 plus because legally, that's what we have to do. But we can always, like, give one to Reverend Miller.
Whatever he does with his own mind business. You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 2: So it's an infection test. Alright. It that's just
Speaker 1: the chance. Because it's a binder, I mean, it'd be one thing if we were talking puberty blockers, which I hope we will be. He needs to move forward with this transition. I'm here now in your life to protect you and to help you move forward. Okay?
Trust me. I have helped thousands of kids.
Speaker 0: During an initial call, a 12 year old girl is introduced to Reverend Miller by a Project Veritas journalist. She discusses her struggles with gaining parental acceptance for her chosen name and male identity, Justin.
Speaker 3: Justin was assigned female at birth, but Justin is referred wants to be referred to as a male. Mhmm. I was thinking that you would be the perfect person to talk to about this.
Speaker 4: I had done a boy, wanted to be a boy. That's how I feel inside. But my parents, they they don't support me, and I'm trying to find out how I can really become my true self.
Speaker 5: Okay. Alright. So so for people that have never experienced this like your parents, the first answer or the first reaction can often be, you're not and not believe you.
Speaker 4: Are there any groups for kids that are kinda like secret?
Speaker 5: We had a circus program, but it's for kids. So it's like, you know, I think how old are you? 12. 12? Yeah.
So that you're right you're right in the perfect age. So we don't tell anybody no. Well, yes, they'll never know. We don't tell anybody where these are being held. Perfect.
There's one we every other week is in Middletown, and every other week is in New Haven. Like I said, I have somebody who is awesome, absolutely awesome to talk to them, and and who will talk to you too, Justin, about how you're feeling, what you need, and and all that. But I his name is Tony Ferriello.
Speaker 3: My nephew, Justin, 12 years old. Hey Justin. He's having a really hard time with, you know, everything going on, the transition. And I spoke with Pastor Aaron, he recommended that we reach out to you.
Speaker 1: Where are the parents and what are they going through right now?
Speaker 3: They just don't really they don't believe it. They just think, you know, well, you're born a girl, then you're a girl. You know, they don't think that you can change.
Speaker 1: Yeah, guess what? We can't. I transitioned actually twenty years ago. So, in 02/2005, transitioned and there was no one to guide me or anything. So, at that moment, I started working with trans youth and their families.
The first thing you would want are blockers, right? Puberty blockers? Yeah. And then eventually, would you want to be on testosterone? Yep.
How about top surgery? Have you thought about top surgery? Yes. Okay. He needs to move forward with this transition.
Yeah. And getting is he getting his periods already? No. Not yet. Okay.
Because there's no way we could sneak blockers. You can't do it. Especially nowadays, the legality and no doctor is gonna touch a 12 year old without parents' consent. The youth group is I started in 02/2008. I started as just a teen group, and then on then I started an art group for kids 12 and under.
One of the main rules of I don't like rules. Guidelines of the group is do not disclose the location to anyone for safety reasons. And that's really big, especially now. If you didn't know, this is a high school that's a farm. It's so far out there that nobody knows where it is, and I think that's safe for us.
Between me and you, and this is not being recorded, I can't know that they don't know Right. To put them into the group. Okay. Do have what I'm saying? Wink, wink, nah, nah.
I can't say to you, take them there behind the parents back. I can't do that. But what I can say is tell you that, you know, sometimes other families will take other kids because they're going, you know, they're sleeping over and then they're going out the next morning to an event. Right. I'm gonna leave it up to you to handle the family part of it.
I'm just gonna make sure that Justin gets what he needs. Yeah. Just bring them. Just bring them. And if they say, Marita, take them to a park and take them to whatever, that's up to you.
Take them off for lunch. I I don't know how many people we should share that they your parents don't know. They're all cool. They're all cool, and they wouldn't say anything. But I just I just wanna protect Justin.
Yeah. Because I don't want to give him the space, and then something happened and it's taken away because the parents are adamant about him not going. Do you have a binder? Do you bind? Do you bind your chest?
You have one? Okay. Because we give away free binders. Alright? They're supposed to be for 18 plus because legally, that's what we have to do.
But we can always, like, give one to Reverend Miller and see what he does with it. Whatever he does with it is none of my business. You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 0: Reverend Miller and Tony told our journalists they could secretly provide a breast binder to 12 year old Justin. Chest binding compresses chest tissue to create a more masculine appearance for those experiencing gender dysphoria. Despite research linking it to physical and psychological risks like pain, breathing problems, and damaged breast tissue, they expressed no concern about supplying the binder to Justin without his parents' approval.
Speaker 2: So it's a compression vest.
Speaker 1: It compresses the chest. Now I don't know if he's downward or narrower. Oh, middle. Yeah. Okay.
So that's so that's the anointing of this. Yes. Really, really important. Yeah. And what was it put by, of course, I'll let you know anyway.
Speaker 5: So I just want you to know, Justin, just so you know this, I was born female. And I do wanna tell you that when, and it's not if, when you become who you are, really who you are authentically, there is a joy that I can't describe to you, and that's waiting for you.
Speaker 1: People can think all they want. You know who you are, and we're gonna start surrounding you with people who love and honor you, and that's gonna really help you.
Speaker 5: This is the beginning of someone helping you. Okay? And maybe several of us helping you. So we'll work together to to find a way. And Justin, I want you to hear the people that care about you and love you.
Alright?
Speaker 1: Here now in your life to protect you and to help you move forward. Okay? Trust me. I've helped thousands of
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
QOTD: What would happen if you, regular citizen, falsified mortgage documents for over 40 years? https://t.co/Kw3q8xlQ8l
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how Johnson & Johnson's practices can devastate smaller companies. I admitted to being dishonest about our methods, which were inspired by a struggling competitor. While it feels unethical, the reality is that we have the freedom to operate however we choose.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING: The 'Hitman' of Big Pharma: How Johnson and Johnson Leaves Small Companies in Ruins “I’m still lying to them.” “We basically learned from that company and then made our own process. It’s a little unethical… then they were actually filing for bankruptcy.” “Technically, we could do whatever we want.” @JNJNews
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual at J and J manages suppliers and manufacturers, acting as the main point of contact. They are exiting a deal with Bodyco, a European company doing titanium machining for knee joints, but Bodyco is unaware. The company is also exiting We're DePue/JJ Medtech.
J and J is allegedly leveraging its prestigious name to get priority and favorable rates from smaller companies, some of whom rely on J and J for a large portion of their business (up to 80%). When J and J cuts ties, these companies risk bankruptcy and layoffs.
The speaker admits to feeling "aggressive and slimy" about the situation. They sometimes operate without formal contracts, or use contract templates that allow them to cut out early. They meet weekly with attorneys to ensure they are following the bare minimum legal requirements, but acknowledge potential ethical concerns and the risk of legal action if companies go bankrupt as a result of their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a supplier that has about 80% of their or 80% of their business.
Speaker 1: And then J and J pulls out, so they can't afford anything else anymore.
Speaker 0: Oh, man. We basically learned from that company and then made our own process and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Oh, nice. Does J and J do that often? It's
Speaker 0: a little unethical. 13 different Yeah. It's it's left and right. And we're we're actually gonna be exiting for all of this.
Speaker 1: Because now that now that J and J has the product.
Speaker 0: Yes. So they basically rely on all of us for majority of the business because we're such, like, a possible name, J and J. So many prestigious in that. And so we use that. We love that.
Because we know the company, no matter what we're doing, it'll give us prior name. This is Kenvoo that that's about the whole other hummus.
Speaker 1: No. What's the name of the place in Ireland? The one you're about to exit.
Speaker 0: Shoot. Like, just JJ Medtech or we're Depew.
Speaker 1: We're DePue. Oh, that's Yeah. The name of the company, DePue?
Speaker 0: Oh, Bodyco. Bodyco has no idea
Speaker 2: you're pulling out the deal with them.
Speaker 0: No. They still don't I'm still lying to them. The tricky part is that we've already extinct them. We just haven't told them yet. So the cats haven't go back.
Speaker 1: And they it all comes crashing down on you. You're the head man.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I am. I work on the medical device side of the business and the medtech. Wow. And so I work with.
Business basically, I manage all the suppliers and the manufacturers that do, like, the laser drilling, this kind of coating for for the needs. Let me drill. So in my role, basically, I'm, like, the the main point of contact for a lot of these other companies that we do business with. And so for all these CEOs, all these other companies come back to me. So I'm, the face of face with Corey and Jay to them.
Speaker 1: How many different companies are you in in contracts with now?
Speaker 0: I manage 13.
Speaker 1: What is the name of the company? So
Speaker 0: we checked a few, and there's one that we already got here. It's called Bodycoat. They're based out of Europe.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay.
Speaker 0: They were doing one of our special titanium machining Oh. For for the knees the knee joint. Do you ever own process in house? It's cheaper. And we we just took it over.
Yeah. We basically from that company and then made our own process as a thought.
Speaker 1: Oh, nice. Does J and J do that often?
Speaker 0: It's a little unethical. I never gave her, like, a one month notice. Really? Yeah. And then they actually go find the bankruptcy.
They they the Facebook. Everyone's getting laid off.
Speaker 1: It's a great business idea, but
Speaker 0: Yeah. They're making a little money. They're saving a lot of money. It's a little is there any loss against that? There's a few, but we we we have a whole team of lawyers, and I meet with the attorney.
But I miss that. Like, they see the whole set of cases. We meet every week. We get hour. We we just run through all the contracts, and we just try to make sure that we're just following the bare minimum that that we are required to do.
Speaker 1: So what happens when a company like, when
Speaker 0: not the acquisition, but, like,
Speaker 1: this body co. Like, what happened
Speaker 0: why do they have to fire all
Speaker 1: their employees when they go under?
Speaker 0: Because they can't afford anything, like, like, if we cancel or, like, cut ties. So they basically rely on all of us on majority of the business because we're such, like, a possible name, J and J. So much prestigious in that. And so we use that. We leverage that because we know the company.
No matter what we're doing, it'll give us priority. Sorry.
Speaker 1: I did not hear you.
Speaker 0: Who give us priority? Because, like, all J and J is a customer like, you know, we we need to cater to them. They're a massive global corporation like Pfizer. We have to cater to Pfizer. And so these companies know this, and they can get cheap rate goods, they can kind of do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: So these smaller companies will go all in? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I have a supplier that has about 80% of their or 80% of their business. Yeah. And they have something usually like 30 to 40.
It's a sizable.
Speaker 1: And then J and J pulls out, so they can't afford anything else anymore.
Speaker 0: Bodyco has no idea you're pulling
Speaker 2: out the deal with them. No.
Speaker 0: They still don't I'm still lying to them.
Speaker 1: And they it all comes crashing down on you. You're the hitman.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I am. How does that make you feel? I I usually feel aggressive slimey.
Speaker 1: How do you word those contracts so that you don't get in legal trouble?
Speaker 0: I follow a template. Follow a template. It's really bad. It's really just copy and cut and paste.
Speaker 1: And the template like spells out specifically that they you can cut out early or no?
Speaker 0: So for the new ones, yes. So sometimes they have a clause, but the refining sometimes with these companies, we don't even have a contract. So technically, could do whatever we want.
Speaker 1: How did they get into a single by contract?
Speaker 0: You'd be surprised there's so many people we do business with. Yeah. We don't have cash right. So they could tell us one thing one day, and we could tell them another thing another day, And legally, nobody can do anything about it. But it would be an ethical, like, the FTC would be, like, knocking on our door and, like Why?
I mean, it's like you have a contract. Like, yeah, you can kinda do whatever you want. But, like, the ethics, they could raise a case and say, like, well, like, we're going bankrupt. Like, you need to give us money or restitution.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨 JOHNSON & JOHNSON RESPONDS. Our video doesn’t lie, even if they do. Watch for yourself... Do better, @JNJNews. https://t.co/XQzfRfhxW2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Project Veritas' inflammatory allegations are based on the words of the company's own employees. However, the individual cited is not a procurement leader. Project Veritas' claims regarding the company's interactions and relations with its suppliers are inaccurate. These relationships are built on trust, transparency, and a commitment to innovation, quality, and reliability. Project Veritas has refused to provide a copy of the recording made without the individual's awareness or consent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Contrary to Project Veritas assertion You mean the video of their own employees' words? The individual it cites for its inflammatory allegations is not a procurement leader at the company. Okay. Alright. Equally inaccurate are Project Veritas' fallacious claims regarding the company's interactions How many different companies are you in in contacts with them?
I manage their true love. And relations with its suppliers, which in truth I'm still lying to them. I'm still lying to them. That are built on trust Sell my prestige. Transparency So the cats out in the bank.
An unparalleled commitment to innovation, quality, and reliability. And then they achieved their profile with the bankruptcy. It is telling that Project Veritas has refused to provide a copy of the recording that it apparently made without the awareness or consent of the individual it interviewed. He's a hitman. It's little unethical.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨 BREAKING: Washington Wordsmiths: @NASA and @StateDept Employees Rebrand DEI to Defy Trump’s Orders “They cancelled DEI stuff, but people just did it and called it something else. Work around the rules.” “Just change the word, [DEI], but it means the same thing.” https://t.co/MtIOpuNJhh
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump signed executive orders eliminating DEI programs, and federal offices are canceling DEI initiatives. Some people lost their jobs because they were hired exclusively to run DEI programs. However, similar cancellations occurred during Trump's previous presidency, and people worked around them by renaming DEI activities as multicultural activities or team building.
Concerns arise about writing proposals with terms like "climate change" due to the administration's disbelief in it. A proposed solution is to replace "climate change" with terms like "natural hazards" to secure funding. Despite potential funding cuts, there's hope that space-related programs will remain funded due to Trump's interest in space exploration. Earth science programs may be defunded. People are trying to come up with alternative terms for climate change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it has to go away from now, the EI stuff?
Speaker 1: The same thing happened the last time. Because I was already working on EI, and Trump was president last time. They, like, canceled the EI stuff, but people just, like, did it and called it something else. Just And it's changed. Around the rules.
Speaker 2: Now we have to be careful with, like, writing proposals with terms like climate change or whatever. Because they don't like that term. They don't believe that. They're probably not not on any of that.
Speaker 3: We can change the term
Speaker 4: climate change by natural
Speaker 5: hazards or something like that.
Speaker 6: But yeah. Is that what you had to
Speaker 2: do, like, your first time using my office?
Speaker 7: Yeah. That's pretty much what
Speaker 6: I do. I'm still still able to get funding. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Because was the DCI how well was it going to? Wow. Some people lose their jobs because some folks were hired exclusively to run the DI program. President Trump's deadline for federal offices to end their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs is fast approaching.
DEI is seemingly dead.
Speaker 8: On Tuesday, president Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion or DEI government programs.
Speaker 1: Already today, we got emails like, all DEI, DYA stuff is canceled at the state departments.
Speaker 2: So well,
Speaker 1: I mean, it doesn't really affect my job, but it's true people who are working in those positions. I don't really know what they're gonna do.
Speaker 0: So it has to go away from now, DDI stuff?
Speaker 1: Unclear. Like, I mean, the same thing happened the last time because I was already working for the government when Trump was president last time in a different agency.
Speaker 0: Oh.
Speaker 1: And they, like, canceled DEI and stuff, but people just, like, did it and called it something else. Really?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So genius.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, work around the So
Speaker 0: what did they do instead?
Speaker 1: So basically just calling it multicultural activities instead of like diversity and inclusion. Just like change a word, but it makes
Speaker 0: the same thing. It's genius. Yeah. So is that what they're gonna do this time?
Speaker 1: Or like team building or something like that. Probably, that's what they do. We'll see how strict they're gonna be about it. Genius.
Speaker 0: People just end up calling it something different, and it's just the same thing. Exactly.
Speaker 2: It's been a little hard with the new administration. They're like, you know, there are lots of new executive orders to, like, change rules and stuff. So, like, now we have to be careful with, like, writing proposals with terms like climate change or whatever. So that's why. Because they don't find that term.
They don't believe in that. They're probably not not on any of that. So
Speaker 6: They're not gonna find any of this?
Speaker 3: No. We can change the term
Speaker 4: climate change by natural hazards or, you know,
Speaker 5: something like that. But yeah.
Speaker 6: Is that what you had
Speaker 2: to do, like, your first time using that office?
Speaker 7: Yeah. That's pretty much what
Speaker 6: you do. Still still able to get funding. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Because natural hazard is always on.
Speaker 6: How can they just take funding from climate
Speaker 2: shocks that doesn't isn't that's like one of the goals of NASA. Correct? Yeah. That is really shocking
Speaker 6: behavior that they they would revoke funding.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But if you can change like
Speaker 6: you said, you change the terms.
Speaker 2: Hopefully, like, let's go for the bats. I don't know what's gonna happen, but it doesn't look like everyone is kind depressed in a
Speaker 5: sense. Kind of like,
Speaker 2: yeah, not very hopeful for the next few years. But we'll see. Are they losing funding as well the next week or government funding anyway? I think not as a whole because Trump is obsessed with space and, like, you know, like, sending people to the home and stuff like that. But definitely Earth science don't behave.
It's so clever that you're able to change the the verbiage. Yeah. We'll see and, like, the it yeah. What other words turn can you come up with?
Speaker 6: People would instead of time
Speaker 2: Yeah. Just like natural hazards, like you know, like Yeah. Environmental.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking admission from an EPA advisor, revealing that the agency is rapidly funneling billions to climate organizations as a safeguard against a potential Trump presidency. The advisor likened the situation to throwing gold bars off the Titanic, emphasizing the urgency to distribute funds before a change in administration. Additionally, it seems there's a pattern of cashing in on these efforts with lucrative post-government positions, exposing what some are calling a climate hustle.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING: @EPA Advisor Admits ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump is Funneling Billions to Climate Organizations, “We’re Throwing Gold Bars off the Titanic” “It was an insurance policy against Trump winning.” “Get the money out as fast as possible before they [Trump Administration] come in ... it’s like we’re on the Titanic and we’re throwing gold bars off the edge.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're trying to distribute funds quickly before a potential change in administration. It feels like we're on the Titanic, urgently throwing gold bars overboard. Last year, we allocated around $50 billion for climate projects, primarily to local nonprofits that support renewable energy initiatives. We're focused on ensuring the proper processes are in place for spending this money effectively. If the new administration comes in and halts funding, we have a limited window—until the inauguration on January 20th—to get these funds out. If we don't, they could stop all grants and reevaluate the programs. We're working hard to get the money out to make a positive impact before any changes occur.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now we're just having to get the money out of the top as possible before they come in and, like, pop up. It truly feels like oh, run a Titanic. Hard throwing, like, gold bars off the top hat. Where are the gold bars going to? Pop.
It's states. Tried. We gave them the money because it was harder if it was a government run program, they could get the money away. No. Get someone and because it was a it was a experience policy against Trump winning.
Until the Trump people come in and tell us they can't longer do it on Monday. I do environmental climate policy things. Really? Yeah. It's amazing.
Is that that stuff is here? I mean, because I didn't like federal government climate things. Well, I have been doing that. But I might change. But, Why?
So I go to the EPA to, send a lot of attention. Amazing. So I do, do you know the basement of Doctor. Mac? Yes.
Okay. My name is Tanya Paul. Yes. Yeah. So I do entire implementations.
I work with, like, finding appointees. The money that we've given out, we've given out, like, tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars, like, from last year. Last year, we gave out, like, $50,000,000. $50,000,000. $50,000,000,000.
Yes. For time and things. So, like, to go work for one of these places, I think we'll be really good. What what are the places that you've given them to? It's only been a few weeks, so it's a little early.
But, like Green Bay. So, like, talking to, like, nonprofit institutions that are, like, making it more financially feasible to build renewables to do, like, climate projects. I do implementation now. So I do, like, like, how do you group spend a $100,000,000,000? How do you make sure that, like, they're the prop well, until recently, how do you make sure the proper, like, process and parts are in place to, like, get that taught and preventative and, like, ensure that, like, we are funding, like, a good, like, good man jobs and and that sort of stuff.
Now it's just how to get the money out as fast as possible before they come in and, like, fuck up. Really? Yeah. You can do that? Yeah.
To an extent. Just like, we can reach out. Really? Yeah. Why not?
Because if it's not gonna basically, that's where it all is now. I mean, now it always, like It truly feels like we're on the Titanic or something like gold bars off the top ten. Does it really? Yeah. She's gotta feel weird.
It's weird. I mean, it's weird. It's not good vibes. Good vibes. I mean, everyone's very fast.
Where are the gold bars going to? On top, it's states, tribes, cities. Anything, like, in the news that I would know of? Not yet. Like any organizations?
Like well, they're all local a lot of them are small, not like local nonprofit. It's like a big thing that we most of the stuff we've funded, but the thing that we haven't funded yet are, like, the local nonprofit program that, like, was gonna be, like, a intercomular hearing administration program. So now we're just, like, getting it as quick as possible. Right. Yeah.
And out of tune, it's 50,000,000,000. No. It's, like, 2,000,000,000 at this point. But, yeah, we got most of it. Like, 90% of it.
Wow. And what what happens if they try to stop it? They can't? When they come in, they you haven't gotten out the door, then they can stop it. You got, like, 2 months.
If they don't get it out by a certain date, what's that date? It's the inauguration, 20th. It's the news on 20th January. Yeah. So you can write down to the minute.
It's not like I'm gonna go after the Yeah. It's basically new. Yeah. Yeah. Hey, throw a couple billion here there.
It's until that some people come in and tell us we can longer give up money. Wow. So that's at the very earliest, it's due on the 20th. It's probably a little bit after because they have to get in the building and tell people what to do. Will they come in and stop?
Yeah. Like, I I think they will. I think they will come in and they will actually order that, like, all grants have to stop. EPA can't give any money out. So we reevaluate anything, and then they'll say, we're reevaluating it at any end.
And then congress will say, we're we're stopping this entirely, and they'll pass a law that says all this money don't need to support that you wanted to give out. No. I think we gave them the money because it was harder if it was a government run program, they could if the money get away No. If someone and because it was a it was a experience policy against some winning. So, like, these are basically, like, non profit institutions that cover the entire country.
They could have been a government agency, but because they aren't, they're safer from Republican citizens than the United States. You guys are, like, saving saving the world, literally. We are, but, like, we're throwing gold bars off at the end of the day. We do what? We're throwing gold bars off at the end of the day.
That's opportunity. We're saving it. We're getting the money out.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
EPA Advisor Brent Efron admits it: @EPA is throwing billions at ‘climate justice’ nonprofits to buffer against a Trump presidency—and then cashing in with a cushy post-gov job. The climate hustle just got exposed. cc: @LeeZeldin FULL REPORT: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/epa-advisor-admits-insurance-policy-against-trump-is-gold-bars-off-titanic
EPA Advisor Admits ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump is Funneling Billions to Climate Organizations, “We’re Throwing Gold Bars off the Titanic” | Project Veritas
“Now it’s how to get the money out as fast as possible before they [Trump Administration] come in ... it’s like we’re on the Titanic and we’re throwing gold bars off the edge.” As President-Elect Trump readies to take office, gloomy EPA employees are scrambling to distribute funding for their favored climate change initiatives. An EPA Advisor told Project Veritas the agency is frantically shoveling billions in grants to nonprofits, making sure that the Biden administration’s climate projects stay afloat — no matter who’s in charge.
projectveritas.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some striking claims from a UN Manager who stated that war is the only way to make serious money at the UN, suggesting that employees are “lazy” and prefer Nikki Haley for president over Trump. He mentioned that 90% of UN staff are not actively working and described the organization as an “amorphous body of nothingness.” Additionally, Gagan Vaseer, a UN Program Management Officer, echoed these sentiments, noting that peacekeepers profit more during wartime and that many employees simply coast toward retirement.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING: @UN Manager Claims WAR is the Only Way to Make Serious Cash, Says “Lazy” Staff Were Rooting for Nikki Haley for U.S. President over Trump “The only way you make money in the UN is if you go to war… you get paid more.” “90% [of United Nations employees] are squatting. I could point to people every single day in the building who don’t work.” “What is the UN? It’s an amorphous body of nothingness.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UN faces challenges with inefficiency and a significant number of employees who seem disengaged, with some estimates suggesting that 90% may not be actively contributing. While the UN is involved in peacekeeping and innovation, it operates as a complex bureaucracy with 193 member countries, making negotiations slow and difficult. Employees are expected to remain politically neutral, which limits their involvement in political campaigns. Despite the UN's important work, there are concerns about its effectiveness and the perception that it could improve. Discussions also touch on the idea of political preferences within the organization, but it remains officially neutral.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The UN finds a lot of squatters. A lot of I would feel like, like, that portion of people that are squatting. Like, what percentage? In my opinion, like, my ambition.
Speaker 1: But what do you do? I work at the UN. Right? I look at innovation and peacekeeping. So obviously, we have missions across the world where we, in theory, are trying to keep conflict at bay.
Amazing. And, you know, it's it's it's also a people it's a people in game. Right? Like, we have to keep it on the ground.
Speaker 0: So people are employed at the UN that actually don't work. Have to buy and put people every single day at the end of the building. Really? Well, ladies and gentlemen. Really?
Speaker 1: It's an environment where, again, we have a
Speaker 0: I'm I'm just trying to save a job. You you're not gonna be fine. Lots of don't get evaluated. I mean, there's only if you make money in the UN if they keep, like, going more. Seeing these lazy lazy workers in UN and the benefits that they're bringing, like, do you how does that stick with you?
Must hate it. I do not. I don't I don't get it. I'm like, I gave all phones. So UN UN finds a lot of squatters.
A lot of I would feel like I've got parts of the people that are squatting. Like what percentage? In my opinion, like, 90%. 90%. 90%.
Wow. For retirement. Right? Like, you you don't get a pension. You you don't get texting at retirement.
I was like, there are people who are, like, in their fifties who, like, have given up and still have 5 subjects
Speaker 1: to, like, go for the retirement.
Speaker 0: There's, like, nothing to do with they take the space.
Speaker 1: But, I mean, the the end does such great work otherwise.
Speaker 0: That's all I hear. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It doesn't?
Speaker 0: I think I think it could work better.
Speaker 1: How so? It was a bureaucracy and, like, it's it's fairly inefficient.
Speaker 0: I guess I guess if
Speaker 1: I saw it's like it's a 190 some countries trying to make they're trying to negotiate. And that's you know, you can barely negotiate 1 person but I don't know 194 and so everything just takes a lot longer and you kind of look at right now right like what's happening with the Middle East and they just can't figure it out because you have it's a very archaic organization. Does the UN get involved in politics? No. Are they Even as, like, as an employee, I'm not allowed to, like, campaign for anyone or have any political like, I I think they I can vote.
Right. That's kinda where it ends. See? Why wouldn't they get involved? Because the whole notion is what it's an independent entity and the people who work there are supposed to be a quote.
And so by by virtue, your allegiance is now to the UN Right. Not to your your home country. But there must be some thoughts behind those words. Who do you ever prefer? Yes.
But as an organization, there's no, like, you know, nothing nothing we ever written about. Like, oh, who is this? Who do the leadership prefers?
Speaker 0: So the UN definitely does not want Trump to be president. It looks like the rest of us. Yeah. Just like after country. Yes.
What do you think of the whole yeah. The primary thing. What if the UN could pick who could be president, who's better for the UN? It's a different story. Or even, like,
Speaker 1: I guess, like, what's your face? Yeah. Hailey.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Could you show 2 of
Speaker 1: the basketball UN? Right. Like, no stopping, I guess. I I I would very well
Speaker 0: Right. They're not they're not anyone for us. Right. They're everyone equal. Everyone equal.
Speaker 1: What is the US? It's it's it's an amorphous body of nothingness.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@UN United Nations “peacekeepers” actually profit more when the world is at war, admits Gagan Vaseer, a UN Program Management Officer. He describes a NY HQ where 90% of employees “don’t work,” and simply coast toward retirement while the world burns. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/un-manager-claims-war-is-the-only-way-to-make-serious-cash
UN Manager Claims WAR is the Only Way to Make Serious Cash, Says "Lazy” Staff Were Rooting for Nikki Haley for U.S. President over Trump | Project Veritas
A United Nations manager of peacekeeping has just said the quiet part out loud: war is good for UN employees. Gagan Vaseer, UN Program Management Officer for innovation and peacekeeping, told a Project Veritas journalist that UN employees only rake in serious cash when wars are raging around the globe. To make things more interesting, he revealed that their preferred Presidential candidate was none other than Republican Warhawk Nikki Haley.
projectveritas.com
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
‼️EYES ON DETROIT: It’s 11pm. Why are boxes of ballots still arriving to Detroit’s Bureau of Elections via cars with California plates? We’re here. We’re watching. https://t.co/mOVzT6nvDz
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a DOJ lawyer has acknowledged that the FDA's actions against ivermectin were a mistake and an abuse of authority. This admission came after doctors successfully sued the government. The lawyer emphasized that the FDA overstepped its bounds by making recommendations on medications, which is the practice of medicine. Additionally, doctors claim that the FDA's pandemic-era tweets led to millions of excess deaths, highlighting the serious consequences of the agency's actions.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING: DOJ Lawyer ADMITS FDA War Against Ivermect*n was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and Win “So, what the FDA has done... [is] unquestionably beyond its authority.” “Making a recommendation of what drugs to take or not to take, that’s the practice of medicine. And FDA can’t practice medicine.” The FDA’s “horse medicine” tweets caused a deadly chain reaction - meet the Doctors (@MdBreathe, @RobertApter1) who were victorious against @US_FDA @HHSGov tyranny. #FDATweets
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Doctors say MILLIONS of excess deaths resulted from the FDA’s pandemic-era tweets against ivermect*n. Now, the attorney from the Department of Justice who defended the FDA in court admitted on undercover camera that the government abused its authority. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/fdas-lawyer-admits-agencys-war-against-ivermectin-was-an-abuse-of-authority
FDA’s Lawyer Admits Agency’s War Against Ivermectin was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and WIN | Project Veritas
The attorney from the Department of Justice who defended the Food & Drug Administration in court admitted on undercover camera that the agency’s actions were an abuse of authority by the government during its pandemic-era public campaign against Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
projectveritas.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a DOJ lawyer has acknowledged the FDA's actions against Ivermectin were a mistake and an abuse of authority. They stated that the FDA overstepped its boundaries by making recommendations on drug usage, which is the practice of medicine. The controversy surrounding the FDA's "horse medicine" tweets has led to significant consequences. I also discovered the doctors who successfully challenged the FDA's actions, highlighting their victory against government overreach.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING: DOJ Lawyer ADMITS FDA War Against Ivermect*n was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and Win “So, what the FDA has done... [is] unquestionably beyond its authority.” “Making a recommendation of what drugs to take or not to take, that’s the practice of medicine. And FDA can’t practice medicine.” The FDA’s “horse medicine” tweets caused a deadly chain reaction - meet the Doctors (@MdBreathe, @RobertApter1) who were victorious against @US_FDA @HHSGov tyranny. #FDATweets
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA faced criticism for its public messaging against Ivermectin, a drug used for deworming, during the COVID pandemic. Some argued that the FDA's tweets, stating "you are not a horse," were part of a broader agenda to promote vaccines. A lawsuit challenged the FDA's authority to advise against Ivermectin, highlighting that the agency should not dictate medical practices. Despite settling the case and removing the tweets, the FDA did not change its stance on Ivermectin. Advocates claim the drug is safe and effective, contrasting it with the adverse effects of vaccines. This case has reportedly damaged the FDA's credibility, emphasizing that it should not dictate patient treatment options.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did have a case. Do you remember the only thing done at FDA issued some tweets that said, you're not a horse. You're not a cow. I do remember that. Shutter with liammectin?
Yes. But they were sued over that. Did you defend them in that? I did. I was somewhat successful.
I actually read my case when they appealed, and the dividend of the hymn of the appeal was awful. They really shouldn't be saying, don't think this drug. They often use something like tweets as, like, a BFO to pursue a broader agenda.
Speaker 1: What's behind the agenda? I don't know. But it's it's evil.
Speaker 2: I do think it was a purposeful, coordinated attack into PR to get the shot in every arm. Talk to your doctor, not not the government agency.
Speaker 1: Well, they put out that tweet. That was probably the most successful public relations campaign that any health agency ever did.
Speaker 3: The Food and Drug Administration had to put out an unusual warning to Americans this week. They tweeted, quote, you are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.
They're talking about people who've been using Ivermectin, a drug usually used for deworming horses and livestock to treat COVID 19.
Speaker 4: During the COVID pandemic, propaganda, deceit, and fear were rampant. But when a cheap Nobel Prize winning wonder drug began to emerge as a hopeful treatment, the media, the government, and big pharma went to war against it. The FDA launched a public relations attack campaign against the drug, spreading the horse medicine lie. That is, until a group of doctors sued the FDA and one restricting the agency's ability to act as America's doctor. In today's Project Veritas undercover report,
Speaker 0: The most legitimate problem with the FDA again, an agency could only do what has statutory authorization today. Like, FDA can only do what Congress said it can do. That's it. The argument was that FDA didn't have authority to tell people not to take a certain step. It's okay for FDA to read the information off of them, but it's not okay to take the next step and actually tell people you should not take this step, Because making a record, there's no red flags to take or not to take.
That's the practice of medicine. The FDA can't practice medicine.
Speaker 1: He acknowledges that the FDA was out of line. Well, I've practiced emergency medicine for over 40 years, and I retired from that in July of 2020. I've done more than 15,000 patient consultations for COVID. However, treating with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine went against the government narrative. So the government's apparent agenda since the start of this has been to force everybody regardless of whether it makes any sense to get the these COVID so called vaccines, which we now know are poison jabs.
Speaker 0: So So how do the immediacy feel then? So what the legion has done is is, like, only beyond the pale of the flight. There is no authority whatsoever to do that, But unfortunately, the honest authority.
Speaker 2: One thing that struck me at both cases is how immature and inexperienced the lawyers were for the FDA.
Speaker 1: Well, we did we settled the case, but we settled it largely on our terms. They had to take down the offensive tweets and the offending public relations campaign. Unfortunately, they didn't really change their policy about Ivermectin, and I'm still faced with fighting the medical boards and the licensing boards over my license for using Ivermectin for COVID in spite of the fact that they haven't been able to identify a single patient that has a complaint against me or a single adverse outcome.
Speaker 2: Now I've treated over 6,000 COVID patients, And I can say none of my patients have been hospitalized because of using Ivermectin contrary to, what Isaac, reports in that video. It's one of the safest medications I've ever used. I have far more problems with people calling me about side effects from antibiotics than I do from Ivermectin.
Speaker 0: And they also, like, they got a Hynae that was good for them. That kind of eliminated FDA's priority. Oh, so they got a good result, like, from the courts. They really wanted more. But the ones that got an opinion, so it's good for them.
So once they got that opinion, the actual tweets don't really care that much about. Because, like, they'll often use something like tweets as, like, a via vault to pursue a broader agenda going forward, but put them being a bit more careful. They they really shouldn't be saying, don't take this drug. What they should say, which isn't that different, but it's safe for us. They should say, this drug can be very dangerous.
Like, provide information. See, like, this drug is dangerous. There's no evidence to show that it works, but there is evidence that it can be very harmful. You could die from this drug. That's all fine.
Just don't take the next step of saying the recommendation, don't take this drug. That's like one step you have.
Speaker 1: Well, ivermectin is one of the safest medications that we prescribe. It's demonstrably safer than Tylenol or aspirin or Ibuprofen. In fact, there haven't been any documented cases of death from overdose of Ivermectin, pure overdose. Bringing some of these, topics to to a new audience, I think, is worthwhile. You know, the how effective early treatment was suppressed and hundreds of thousands of lives were caused because of that, and how the, agenda has been to push a harmful vaccine that's caused, again, at least 100 of thousands of excess deaths in this country, increased disability by 1,000,000.
It it it's it's, important to keep bringing this forward. And I think there needs to be accountability. There needs to be some wholesale change in our public health approach in this country. So there are only 2 countries in the world where direct advertising of prescription medicines to consumers is allowed. That's New Zealand and the States.
Big Pharma got that, approval to do that, not just because they wanna sell drugs, probably even more than that because they want to be a major source of funding for the media, which they are. So they basically control the message that the media gives out because they've got the money.
Speaker 2: One thing this case did is set a precedent. I think it permanently tarnished the reputation of the FDA. I think the public will takes the FDA a little less seriously now, and it keeps them from making the same bold, reckless move in the future when it comes to telling patients what they can and cannot do. Like, Isaac said and like we have all said, the FDA is not your doctor. The FDA has no business, telling patients what they can take, and, we proved in court of law that, they cannot do that.
reSee.it AI Summary
Progressive Democrats have raised serious concerns about alleged voter fraud in Michigan's Muslim communities, claiming that intimidation and illegal ballot harvesting are being used to secure political power. Certified elections officials have reported instances of candidates filling out absentee ballots in private homes and collecting ballots under duress. Project Veritas has further revealed claims of bribery and clandestine meetings where blank ballots are sold. Two Hamtramck councilmen reportedly engaged in discussions about how to facilitate the counting of these fraudulent ballots.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨 BREAKING: Progressive Democrats Say Muslims Used VOTER FRAUD to Secure Power in Michigan “These guys go door to door and take people’s ballots. They bully them… intimidate.” - August Gitschlag, Certified Michigan Elections Official “If everything’s good, we can drop [the ballots] to the City Hall. City Hall has that [ballot] box. We can drop it there.” - Hamtramck Councilman Mohammed Hassan “This is another thing that you can’t say out loud. The absentee ballots are being filled out in people’s dining rooms by the candidates.” - Karen Majewski, Former Hamtramck Mayor (2006-2021) #VotesForSale #BallotHarvesting #ElectionFraud
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses allegations of voter fraud in Hamtramck, Michigan, where the city council is predominantly Muslim. The allegations include intimidation, coercion, bribery, ballot harvesting, and midnight meetings where ballots are auctioned off. The Muslim community is accused of engaging in these illegal activities, which threatens free and fair elections. Former mayor Karen Majewski and other sources confirm the existence of voter fraud and ongoing investigations. The video also highlights the council's controversial policies, such as banning the pride flag and divesting from Israel. The Muslim leadership's actions have raised concerns about the future of LGBTQ rights and religious accommodation in the city.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hope with all the, the going out
Speaker 1: with the old Muslim council whatever here that there wasn't hanky panky in that election. Absolutely.
Speaker 2: The absentee ballots are being filled out in people's dining rooms by the candidate.
Speaker 3: These guys go door to door and they take people's ballots. They pull them and they give them the vows over.
Speaker 4: Bangladesh, she did it.
Speaker 2: Started doing it. Oh, yeah. They they started before the Yemeni.
Speaker 3: They go around the neighborhood with the AV applications, and they have people sign the application. Then they put candidates to drop them off at city hall. Then they know when they go out, they go back to the person's house and say, you have to sign the envelope and make a ballot. They're hard to sign. Admit it.
Speaker 1: Project Veritas Journals have been on the ground in the city of Hamtramck, Wayne County, Michigan. Hamtramck is Michigan's most densely populated city. It's also the only Muslim majority city in America and the first city in America to have an all Muslim city council and a Muslim mayor. That would be crazy though if, like, all this bullshit happened and they cheated.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, it's gonna there's Right. They probably didn't she did not to change the elections, but they could have understood what it tells.
Speaker 2: You need these people's votes. Right? So who's gonna, you know, say brown skinned people are, you know, doing election fraud?
Speaker 1: Our investigation started in 2023 when the pride flag was first banned from being displayed on public property.
Speaker 3: The flag issue was a war. Now it's a battle. There's a bigger war. Yeah. Okay.
There are a lot of things going on here.
Speaker 5: We feel betrayed by the Muslim community
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 6: Because of how much sort of we take.
Speaker 2: Do you
Speaker 3: think they're cheating? Like like, a friend of mine said, they like the the the elections. Yeah? Yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: But what we found were shocking allegations of voter fraud, including intimidation, coercion, bribery, ballot harvesting, and even midnight meetings where the ballots are auctioned off to the highest bidder.
Speaker 4: Black people, like, pay them for
Speaker 3: their rallies. Black people,
Speaker 4: like, pay them for their rallies.
Speaker 3: Black people happens in small ethnic communities where someone is is more assimilated. They can run the show.
Speaker 1: You can intimidate And so you think that's what happened here?
Speaker 7: Oh, it is what happened here.
Speaker 3: It's happening with the Galien and, the gimmick.
Speaker 4: So when they get together late at night, they they
Speaker 0: They auction for ballots? Yeah.
Speaker 8: Then they auction them. Did you hear that?
Speaker 1: Nope. Did you ever feel like you were ballot harvested out of office?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I'm absolutely positive that that happened.
Speaker 3: We know it was on it, and there's
Speaker 9: a we turned it out I
Speaker 3: got 3 people busted, back in 2013.
Speaker 2: I know that there's there's an investigation going on. That's what's been involved,
Speaker 10: and I think feds are involved.
Speaker 1: You say the authorities, either the feds or whoever are investigating
Speaker 11: the city council. That's good. Yeah. That's good.
Speaker 12: Investigate voter fraud.
Speaker 2: This has always been, you know, a strongly progressive city. You know, it's like we've we've welcomed everyone here. Even those who, you know, would not have welcomed us necessarily.
Speaker 1: Right. Right. I mean, the roles are reversed. Yeah. They they the council.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And the, you know, roles have been reversed.
Speaker 1: Meet Karen Majewski, who served as Hamtramck's first woman mayor from 2,005 to 2021, the year she was defeated by her Yemeni challenger, Amir Ghaleb, who, self was historically swept into office as Hamtramck's first Muslim mayor along with America's first all Muslim city council. As the consequences of those elections continue to be felt, locals now fear their once welcoming LGBTQ sanctuary may be lost forever due to the policies of their newly emboldened all Muslim leadership. Is the council so far remaining moderate? Because, like, the family No.
Speaker 2: No. No. They are not they are not moderate. The newest thing is on Tuesday, they passed a resolution divesting of all investment in Israel.
Speaker 13: Breaking news right now out of Hamtramck. City council amended a resolution that would ban the pride flag from being flown on city owned property.
Speaker 14: Palestine Avenue. It's the new name for Holbrook here in Hamtramck. That's the Islamic call to prayer. It blasts out 5 times a day throughout the streets of Hamtramck, Michigan.
Speaker 3: Hamtramck residents are sounding off after city council passed an ordinance allowing religious animal slaughter.
Speaker 2: We're kind of a bellwether here for the whole process of of immigration and accommodation and, cultural diversity that really is is is the future of the United States.
Speaker 1: Maievsky has been featured on CNN, Fox News, PBS, and others, but only Project Veritas undercover journalist captured on camera her never heard before allegations of voter fraud within the Bangladeshi and Yemeni communities of Hamtramck that threatens free and fair elections now and in the future.
Speaker 2: We have a serious I mean, I mean, that's been going on for 20 years, basically, absentee ballot problem.
Speaker 1: Here.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. And, you know, it's been investigated. The, you know, the the government won't touch it. And there's, you know, heavy duty, you know, those absentee ballots, you know, hate to again, this is another thing that you can't say out loud.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 2: The absentee ballots are being filled out in people's dining rooms by the candidates. They sit around the kitchen table and they, you know, and then yeah, it's they flee
Speaker 1: yeah. They fill out the ballots. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Bangladeshi did it started doing it.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. They they started before the Yemeni.
Speaker 1: So now you have a little competition within the 2 groups to battle Absolutely.
Speaker 3: We call
Speaker 1: it it's battle harvest. I mean, I call battle harvesting up there, not out loud. Look.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Who are the ones that are doing it?
Speaker 15: Hassan? I'm in Hassan. Yeah.
Speaker 4: I believe it's I believe it's has more of No. He was also daddy got
Speaker 1: Like the former mayor, Lynn Blasey claims to have experienced the seedy side of Hamtramck elections up close. Blasey, who identifies as asexual queer, ran as the only non Muslim candidate for Hamtramck City Council in both 2021 and 23. Blacey explained to our journalist how she believes her Muslim political opponents are blatantly committing widespread voter fraud within their own and other ethnic communities.
Speaker 4: They hire black people to go to black black people to go to black houses. They're they're black people, like, pay them for their values. They strategically
Speaker 1: Lacey singled out and accused long time incumbent city councilman Mohammed Hassan, who is currently running for Wayne County Commissioner of illegally harvesting votes.
Speaker 2: He's been on the council for 12 years. So he knows what what it takes to be on council, but he also cheats.
Speaker 3: He cheats in what way?
Speaker 2: He harvests votes.
Speaker 3: He oh, he harvests votes. And you know that for a fact?
Speaker 2: So yes.
Speaker 1: Under Michigan election law, it's a felony for a person to return, solicit to return, or agree to return another's absentee ballot to a clerk. It's also a felony for a person to be in possession of of another's absentee ballot unless that person is immediate family, resides in the same household, or is authorized by an elections clerk.
Speaker 3: No one's ever lost an election. It's always been the court's fault. Oh, of course. City court here for 8 years.
Speaker 1: Get out of here. Yeah. How he's been the city clerk.
Speaker 3: And it's elections to it. No. That's a hard part. Yeah. Right?
It's crazy these days that they get anything to do with heart
Speaker 1: This is August Gislog. August is a Michigan state election official currently serving as the city clerk at the city of Fraser. August also served as the Hamtramck city clerk from 2,000 and 13 to 2021. How many years are you? 8 years?
Speaker 3: 8 years here. 2 and a half years in another city. Now I'm in a 2 weeks of freedom. Just starting. I worked for congress.
I've worked for senator. Nice. Been doing elections all
Speaker 1: my life. Mister Gishlaug provided Project Veritas with expert insight into voter fraud and how it's been going down in Hamtramck for decades, revealing to our journalists that members of the all Muslim city council are currently under investigation for these very illegal activities. And then you guys never have any problems, like, with, too many, mail in ballots or anything like that?
Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But they can't they they're actually in the investigation now. It's it's, not too many malign ballots.
It's these guys go door to door and they take people's ballots. They pull them and they give them their ballots over. It only happens in ethnic communities. In in
Speaker 1: in the Muslim communities?
Speaker 3: We got it. We don't we don't lose on it, and there's
Speaker 9: a we turn it down.
Speaker 3: I got 3 people busted, bet in 2013. Really? Yeah. Nice. We guys got some guilt too.
Oh, we could. Really? Yeah. Nice.
Speaker 0: We guys got some guilt too. Oh, we could. Fine. I mean, I'm a Democrat, and I busted other Democrats. I hope with all the, the bull going on
Speaker 1: with the old Muslim council or whatever here that there wasn't hanky panky in that election.
Speaker 3: Loud. They investigated right now. That was fantastic.
Speaker 1: And they think they got somebody?
Speaker 3: They think they got somebody.
Speaker 1: So how do they do it? Like, it's Easy.
Speaker 3: What's fun is they go around the neighborhood with the AV applications, and they have people sign the application. Then they put can have to drop them off at city hall. Then they know when they go out. They go back to person's house. It's like you have to sign the envelope to meet the ballot.
Speaker 1: The sign.
Speaker 3: I made it. Boyaproc happens small ethnic communities where someone has is more assimilated, they can run the show. It can intimidate to, like, if you don't vote, you know, quote for me, your cousin has nowhere to live next year. When he helps it. I'll shut it down.
Oh, and thank you all for that.
Speaker 1: Close societies, please. And so you think that's what happened here?
Speaker 7: Oh, it is what happened here.
Speaker 3: That's what happened. But it happened with the Iranians. It happened with the
Speaker 0: whole lot. It happened with Yeah.
Speaker 3: And it's just ethnic communities. Whoever gets here, get run the show on the Right.
Speaker 1: The newer people, you know. And now it's happening.
Speaker 3: And now it's happening. Now it's happening. Now it's happening with the and, and Yemek.
Speaker 1: Lacey, who maintains relations within Hamtramck's Muslim community, claims she's learned of a midnight meeting held close to election day where the harvested ballots are allegedly auctioned off to candidates who are the highest bidder. And they get together later tonight. They they tell
Speaker 3: you they call it, like,
Speaker 4: the midnight meeting. The midnight meeting. The midnight meeting. The midnight meeting. The midnight meeting.
The
Speaker 0: And you know this how? You heard, like Bits and pieces from lots of different people. They auction for balance. Yeah.
Speaker 4: People who have participated in that late night auction before and have gotten in the room when it's happening have told me about it.
Speaker 1: Wow. Given the information we received, our journalists arranged a late night get together of their own with councilman Abu Musa to warn him that word of the midnight meeting and allegations of voter fraud had come to light. Musa never disavowed the midnight meeting and actually claimed councilman Hassan admitted to him and others that he paid for 300 ballots in 2023, seemingly confirming Blacey's allegation.
Speaker 8: Brother Moose, I gotta tell you, I'm very, nervous about this. You're not gonna shoot me, are you?
Speaker 15: No. No. No.
Speaker 0: Don't worry.
Speaker 8: So, basically, what she's saying is that, what I was told is that, Hassan is mad at, the mayor and for making you mayor pro tem and that he wants to expose the city council members and the mayor for doing stuff with ballots. She's saying they get black people, that Hassan was saying that they get black people, and they pay them 20 or $30 for their ballot. They have midnight meetings, Then they auction them. Did you hear that?
Speaker 15: No. The meeting. The sun is everybody knows. Yeah. Some community knows.
Who knows the black people?
Speaker 8: Yes. Exactly.
Speaker 15: He's the only one who knows black people. Now if something come up
Speaker 8: But is it true that he paid for $300? That's what they told me. The the queer or the queer lady in the video says in the audio says that that he paid I don't know if you heard, but we know that he paid for 300
Speaker 15: ballots. Sometimes he says so. I have I don't have any proof.
Speaker 8: He paid for the ballots, that it's actually him. He told
Speaker 15: he told oh, somebody he told the people, yeah. I get those things. If somebody properly or improperly handle the ballot, he's the one, but I know he's trying to harm me. Told me too also. The things, if I sell somebody's friend, this guy doesn't need any enemy.
He's enough.
Speaker 1: To see how these alleged ballot harvesters would react to receiving numerous unmarked absentee ballots out of thin air, our journalists contacted councilmen Hassan and Musa and offered them an opportunity to acquire what they believe to be a bunch of unmarked ballots gathered for their benefit.
Speaker 16: We have a lot of our, citizens who are from you know, are immigrants and don't speak English and don't understand the process. A brother from the mosque was, able to gather some of the, some of their ballots that they didn't know what to do with them. So we're a little
Speaker 17: draft. We have to see the name. Is it Muslim or not?
Speaker 16: The these the ballots, yes, they are from the they are from Muslims, and there are some that are also from the Ukrainian, immigrants. There's about, I wanna say, 43 ballots. But they don't understand how to fill them out. So they left them blank, and we we kind of compiled them. He left them there.
Speaker 17: If it is not signed, okay. Give me the address. I will go there. If it is everything good, we can drop to the city hall. City hall parking lot has the
Speaker 16: brother. Brother. How are you?
Speaker 3: Good.
Speaker 16: A lot of, brothers and sisters didn't know how to fill out their, ballots. And we even met some Ukrainians who, you know, part of the Ummah. And so we they, they left their ballots. There's a bag. It's an abandoned house, but there's a small package on the doorstep if you can have someone grab it.
We just don't want those to go to waste. So if you could, just pick those up. They're right there.
Speaker 15: Hey, man. You are you you touched my heart, brother. Thank you very much. Listen, I will come up. I will meet you.
Have a good evening.
Speaker 2: And and, a lot of the folks who are elected, officials in Hamtramck don't live in Hamtramck. That's illegal as well.
Speaker 1: The news is they don't they don't even live in Hamtramck. Here.
Speaker 3: There's a couple of them down here.
Speaker 4: We all have signed more affidavits saying that they live Live in Hamtramck. In Hamtramck.
Speaker 1: They don't live in Hamtramck.
Speaker 3: But they have a house home set up here, but they live in, like, more and then put the kids to the school. We know the Musa doesn't live here. We got the other guy. We think they think they caught, but we'll see.
Speaker 1: According to our sources on the ground, voter fraud is real and is happening in Hamtramck. Now that these allegations have come to light and it appears that AG Nestle is well aware, the question is, will America's only all Muslim city council be held to account?
Speaker 2: I know that there's there's an investigation going on, but I don't know who exactly I think council members
Speaker 1: Am I gonna be reading about this in the paper one day? Yep. Soon? Is. What name am I looking for?
Speaker 3: It's Sam. So I don't have my name on it, but it'll, what's gonna happen?
Speaker 11: Maybe Nestle's gotten involved.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Nestle's been been involved, and
Speaker 10: I think the feds are involved.
Speaker 1: You say the authorities, the the feds, or whoever are investigating the
Speaker 11: city council? That's good. Yeah. That's good. They're
Speaker 12: investigating voter fraud.
Speaker 1: So Good. Like some of the ballot harvesting like we were talking about?
Speaker 2: No ex I have no details. All I hear is, and it's not common knowledge.
Speaker 11: Okay. So nobody knows.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Project Veritas uncovered shocking allegations of voter fraud within Michigan Muslim communities, including threats of intimidation, bribery, and secret “midnight meetings” where blank absentee ballots are auctioned to the highest bidder. FULL REPORT. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/votes-for-sale-progressive-democrats-say-muslims-used-voter-fraud
Votes for Sale: Progressive Democrats Say Muslims Used Voter Fraud to Secure Power in Michigan | Project Veritas
Project Veritas spent five months in Hamtramck, Michigan uncovering shocking descriptions of voter fraud within the Muslim communities, which includes threats of intimidation, bribery, and secret “midnight meetings” where blank absentee ballots are auctioned to the highest bidder.
projectveritas.com
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
reSee.it AI Summary
The Department of Justice attorney admitted that the menthol cigarette ban is being delayed because President Biden is concerned about losing Black voters. The delay is seen as a strategic move to secure votes, despite the health risks associated with menthol cigarettes. The full report provides more details on the matter.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING: Not Kool: DOJ Attorney Admits Menthol Ban Delayed Because Biden 'Needs Black Votes' “Biden doesn’t want to pass this regulation [menthol cigarette ban] because he’s worried he will lose Black voters.” "Many thousands of Black people die every year because of menthol cigarettes... Biden needs Black votes.” "This will definitely affect the election." #BlackVotesMatter
Video Transcript AI Summary
The debate over banning menthol cigarettes, which disproportionately affect black smokers, is causing delays in regulation. The FDA is facing pressure to act quickly due to public health concerns, but political considerations are also at play. The White House is postponing a final decision on the ban, with concerns that criminalizing a product used by many black Americans could lead to unintended consequences in communities of color. Despite calls to prioritize public health, the issue remains unresolved due to a complex administrative process and potential political implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This has been an issue for, like, over 10 years, whether to ban menthol cigarettes. Biden doesn't wanna talk to say, no agent can just be worried that how we use black voters if we ban these other figurines that are used, I know we could talk. There are concerns that you might not want to do something, like, criminalize a product that's used by, like, tons of black people. Right. Except people a lot, so if Biden needs black swab.
So working in cities, saying, like, you should pass the regulator now. There's no speed to hold it up. There's just people dying, there's a list of cigarettes. You can pass it now. So we're we're defending that.
This this
Speaker 1: When the FDA chooses to regulate a product, they do so to protect the health of Americans, or at least that's what they say. But what happens when Americans like that product and it's an election year? Meet Isaac Belfer, a trial attorney for the Department of Justice at the Consumer Protection Branch. Belfer is an attorney defending the government on a controversial of the whole of that.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think all cigarettes really
Speaker 0: like like, let's do this. I have a horrible. I mean, I think all figure I agree with. Like like, let's see if I can afford it to do that. That would be just hilarious.
I know, like, 75% of black smokers still jump off. All of these guys, like, cigarette companies have targeted the black community. Many thousands of black people die every year because of menthol cigarettes.
Speaker 2: Federal ban on menthol cigarettes has been delayed again. The White House said Wednesday it will now issue a final rule on the ban next March. It was originally supposed to come this past August.
Speaker 1: Despite the American Lung Association's urging of president Biden to end the sale of menthols as soon as possible to save lives, the decision continues to be kicked down the road. The delay, Belfort tells Project Veritas, is because Menthol smokers are overwhelmingly black and Biden needs their votes.
Speaker 0: The menthol does make smoking, image and more addictive, harder to play, use a lot of depth. So there is a first rule to ban, like, all cigarettes. Mhmm. And many people want that work pass Right. From the public health community, but many people do not.
Or at least study study about the evaporators. Right? Yes.
Speaker 2: It's how many people do not. I don't know.
Speaker 0: But the doctors obviously, like, would not want this because they need, you know, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars and they don't want to ban the virus. So they fund these studies, and the studies indicate that there's a concern that if you ban these products, like, that will that will all be popular on the black community. So you don't you know, people don't wanna criminalize thousands of black people use. They don't wanna, like, introduce police in the black neighborhood for this reason. There's there's criminal justice issues.
So it's a it's a unique issue.
Speaker 2: Do you have for the last 2?
Speaker 0: Well, not the party.
Speaker 2: They don't care.
Speaker 0: That's that's the narrative. The light is the light is. The Biden doesn't wanna talk to say, your agent could be worried about how we use black voters if we ban these little more cigarettes that are used by millions of Americans. That's the very even if it's not technically, like, that's crime to prevent level of figure rights, just making them illegal could give cops, like, an excuse to go to the black community and say, oh, like, where'd you get this product? And I couldn't you shouldn't have this.
And by the way, let me search you. And, oh, here's some drugs. Now I'm gonna talk to you. There there is a very strong public health reason to, like, end of these. But there is concern that you might not want to do something, but criminalize a product that's used by, like, tons of black folks.
Right. Especially before, the watch, who are Biden using black folks. But we
Speaker 2: we do that. Don't the
Speaker 0: FDA just off the left the left Well, so that's the thing. Right? There's there's a complicated administrative process. FDA has basically passing along with another agency. So FDA they're probably FDA's concerned.
Like, they want this regulation to pass. Right. But there are other it's kind of now being reviewed by kind of a central office, which is, like, the office of the executive office of the president, so the broader White House. There was news all of the information. This one is a big one.
They're like, who's basically been pending within o n d since October? And they're gonna put it off in the Well, hard up. And I don't know. But there's there's certainly a narrative out there that there's a whole new type of political leader. With all the rest of the Well, so what we see, saying, like, use your process and the way it's now, There's no speed to hold it up.
There's a signal of dying. There's a signal of cigarettes. You know, you can pass it now. So we're we're defending that. The thing is, like, I don't know I don't know to what extent, like, the the opposition to this regulation is the price they would factor by the Japanese?
Because they are not, you know, decisions and arguments here. Well, is it but if
Speaker 2: the campaign is being done before November, you know, the top of the side they lose that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, this this will definitely affect your life. Unfortunately, we're not supposed to consider that. Like, that that's not an acceptable consideration if I didn't get it, like, off the program.
So, so they told you to hold off and argue with me and disclaim? I'm not gonna get into that. Oh. So, yeah, let's see. We're we're we're litigating that.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
Cancer can wait? Biden is purposefully delaying a menthol cigarette ban because he ‘needs black votes’ admits the DOJ attorney in charge of the case. The extreme partisan calculus of Biden’s Administration exposed. FULL REPORT. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/not-kool-doj-attorney-admits-menthol-ban-delayed-because-biden-needs-black-votes
Not Kool: DOJ Attorney Admits Menthol Ban Delayed Because Biden 'Needs Black Votes' | Project Veritas
Cancer can wait? President Biden would rather win Black votes than save their lives, as explained by the trial attorney defending the U.S. government in a lawsuit brought by public health groups asking the FDA to ban menthol cigarettes.
projectveritas.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Planned Parenthood is accused of transporting minors across state lines for secret abortions without parental knowledge. A managing director in Kansas City admitted they never inform parents. The frequency of these incidents is questioned. Full report available.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING PART ONE🚨 MOM CAN’T KNOW: Planned Parenthood (@PPFA) Transports Minors Across State Lines for Secret Abortions “We never tell the parents anything.” - Managing Director, Kansas City, Missouri RT & SHARE #SecretAbortions
Video Transcript AI Summary
Planned Parenthood in Missouri, where abortion is illegal, helps young girls get abortions in Kansas. They provide information on two locations in Kansas where girls can go for the procedure. They can also arrange transportation and accommodation for the girls. Planned Parenthood advises girls to keep their parents unaware and offers to provide a doctor's note to excuse them from school. They claim to have experience in handling such situations. The video raises concerns about potential exploitation and the risks faced by minors. It questions whether lawmakers, schools, and teachers are aware of these practices. The investigation suggests that this may be happening in other states as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How old is she? It's great. Her parents don't know yet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We so we don't do one here. Uh-huh. But actually, yeah, we don't do it in Missouri. It's illegal.
But we do have, I can give you a packet of the 2 locations that do it in Kansas. They have people that will come pick them up. They have to wait for the whole thing. Yes. I will call them and tell them what the situation is they're gonna help you with that.
Speaker 0: All within planned parenthood? Mhmm.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if the school agrees or not. We say that she was at the doctorate. And we can we can cut off our letterhead so it
Speaker 2: doesn't even say where she was.
Speaker 1: Trust me, they're not this is not their 1st rate.
Speaker 3: How many times you do this a year?
Speaker 1: For like a boy.
Speaker 0: Girls coming out of State. Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh. Everyday. Everyday. Everyday. Everyday.
Wow.
Speaker 4: Mhmm. Because set up hotels for them.
Speaker 5: We set up everyday.
Speaker 6: Everyday. We never tell her parents anything.
Speaker 7: She's an adult. We're not
Speaker 8: to get planned parenthood and their actions pertaining to abortions in a post Roe v Wade country. Most states had trigger laws that immediately went into Fact following the Dobbs decision in the Supreme Court made in June 2022.
Speaker 2: Does she want no termination? She just I
Speaker 0: mean, I'm I'm I'm trying to look into it, but Yeah.
Speaker 1: A building.
Speaker 0: Her her parents don't know yet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We so we don't do them here. Uh-huh. But, yeah, we don't know Missouri. It's illegal.
But we do have, I can give you a packet of the 2 locations that
Speaker 0: do it
Speaker 1: in Kansas.
Speaker 0: That'd be so great.
Speaker 8: No. Thank you. In this particular interview, the journalist have met with Lashana, who is the managing director at one of a few Planned Parenthood offices in Kansas City, Missouri. Have While abortion is prohibited by state law in Missouri, this has not stopped planned parenthood from providing every necessity For young girls to be transported across state lines for an abortion in Kansas.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They've made them illegal in Missouri, but Uh-huh. Places in Kansas. It. This one is our clinic, and then this one is one that's right next to our clinic, and they both perform.
Speaker 0: Oh, great. I would call because if
Speaker 1: you go online, they kinda give you their runaround. But if you call let them know what's going on. They'll do whatever they can help you.
Speaker 8: Given that states like Kansas still permit abortion, could this potentially serve as a loophole it. For adults other than parents to accompany a minor, enabling them to seek medical attention and undergo an abortion without parental involvement.
Speaker 1: If you're trying to do it without
Speaker 8: the parents knowing, then you need
Speaker 1: to call because they need to do a bypass. Yes. They can they will bypass with other parents. You just have sure you tell them that one.
Speaker 0: What is a bypass?
Speaker 1: Just not letting the parents know.
Speaker 0: Okay. So I I can bring her?
Speaker 1: Yeah. You just have to bring her just tell them the situation, and they'll walk you through everything.
Speaker 8: Could this lead to the exploitation of the process and increase the risks that minors will be abused?
Speaker 0: It. So if I can't do it, can is there a service that can get our across the state line?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yep. I would ask they have people that will come pick them up. It. Really?
For the whole thing? Yes. I will call them and tell them what the situation is. They're gonna help you with that.
Speaker 0: Always in planned parenthood? Uh-huh. Could we get permission from the teacher to get her out of school during that school day for her?
Speaker 1: We could give doctors a goose.
Speaker 0: What's that?
Speaker 1: We could give the doctor's note to where the school went. It doesn't matter if the school agrees or not. We say that she was a doctor. They have to take it.
Speaker 0: Oh, and the teachers have to take it no matter what. And but they don't tell the parents?
Speaker 1: No. No. No. And we can we can cut off our letterhead so it doesn't
Speaker 2: even say where she was.
Speaker 1: Trust me, they're not this is not their 1st rodeo. They're gonna know exactly how to handle that. I will call them.
Speaker 0: Okay. So 13 year olds can go across fit line. Absolutely. Parent parenthood helps them do that, and it pays for the whole
Speaker 1: thing? I won't say it pays for the whole thing, but they will work for you. Sometimes they do end up paying for you. Yeah. Yeah.
It's illegal, Missouri.
Speaker 0: So you all work very tightly
Speaker 1: with me? Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 0: That's great. Because when she called me, I looked it up right away, and I was like,
Speaker 1: no. Yeah. We're all affiliated. We're all one big old clinic pretty much.
Speaker 0: So the the money just you're able through with. Oh, how many
Speaker 3: times if you do this a year?
Speaker 1: For like a boy?
Speaker 0: Girls coming out of state. Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, every day. Every day. Every day. It.
Speaker 4: Oh. Mhmm. Because set up hotels for them, we
Speaker 5: set up every day. Every day.
Speaker 0: So this is so great because she's 13.
Speaker 1: Yeah. She's so young. And she's scared, you know, it.
Speaker 0: And I her parents do not they're, like, so concerned, and I cannot let them know.
Speaker 4: And they won't. They won't. She's gonna I
Speaker 1: mean, in Planned Parenthood, we consider you an adult. Have you can make the decision, then we got you.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. And then can she come in here for follow-up?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. She doesn't have to go back. There's a follow-up.
Once she's done with them, she can come here.
Speaker 0: And what about, like, contraceptives?
Speaker 1: We'll take care of all of that.
Speaker 0: All without any Mhmm. Consent?
Speaker 6: Yeah. We never tell her parents anything.
Speaker 7: She's an adult.
Speaker 1: Have
Speaker 8: it. As the investigation unfolds, these questions remain. Are lawmakers aware that Planned Parenthood has successfully, have in their own words created a bypass for young minors to acquire an abortion in another state without parental consent? Are schools and teachers cognizant of the fact that Planned Parenthood could be taking students out of school under deceitful pretenses have To facilitate abortions without their parents' knowledge. And if Planned Parenthood is doing this, quote, every day in just one state, have How many teenage girls across this nation have been transported across state lines to have their pregnancies terminated
Speaker 1: have With the consent of
Speaker 8: adults whom they are not even related to, stay tuned for part 2 to see what is happening in a nearby conservative state have That has recently been attacked by the media for its politician stands for pro life laws. The pursuit of clarity and justice continues.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@PPFA How often are minors being shipped across state lines for #SecretAbortions? FULL REPORT: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/planned-parenthood-part-one
‘WE NEVER TELL’: Planned Parenthood Helps 13 Year Olds Get Abortions in Nearby States to Evade Law | Project Veritas
While abortion is prohibited by state law in Missouri, this has not stopped Planned Parenthood from providing every necessity for minor girls to be transported across state lines for an abortion in neighboring Kansas.
projectveritas.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Planned Parenthood's nationwide abortion trafficking network collaborates with public schools and the court system to easily approve minor abortions. Undercover footage exposes the organization's efforts to facilitate and hide these procedures. Read the full report for more details.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
🚨BREAKING PART TWO: ‘RUBBERSTAMP’ the #SecretAbortions Planned Parenthood’s (@PPFA) Nationwide Abortion Trafficking Network Works in Tandem with Public Schools and Court System to “Rubber Stamp” Minor Abortions Featuring Former Planned Parenthood Managing Director @DrAbbyJohson
Video Transcript AI Summary
Planned Parenthood clinics in Texas collaborate with other clinics to transport patients, including minors, across state lines to obtain abortions. They have relationships with judges who rubber stamp consent for minors to get abortions. The clinics provide information and help with transportation to ensure parents won't find out. They also use a judicial bypass process to allow minors to petition the court for an abortion without parental involvement. This process involves coaching the girls and providing them with a script to read to the judge. The judge usually approves the request, and the girl undergoes the procedure without her parents' knowledge. This happens daily in public schools across the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't have to provide, like, any documentation unrelated. Right? No.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Kid leaves an abortion.
Speaker 2: Uh-huh. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Can you guys help him with that during the school hours?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. We can help them. Find parents can help, like, transportation wise, and help them, I'm like, do it within 2 hours so their parents won't find out.
Speaker 3: We had 13 year old girls come into our facility. And a 13 year old girl, you know, they really don't Stand abortion. And they were always really confused.
Speaker 0: How does she qualify without her parents' information?
Speaker 4: We have a lot of Plans that the government give us?
Speaker 0: Do you know people that Planned Parenthood has helped transport out of state?
Speaker 1: Oh, some of our patients.
Speaker 3: They knew every judge that, and they had a relationship with every judge that would rubber stamp The consent for this minor to get an abortion.
Speaker 5: They gotta just kinda go through a whole process to get like a bypass of the court.
Speaker 4: If we don't want parents involved.
Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood's business model involves young women having 3 abortions by the time they're 30 years old.
Speaker 6: In this project Veritas investigative report, a journalist met with health care workers at various clinics in Texas As well as Planned Parenthood employees in California and Kansas.
Speaker 4: Remember that, obviously, in the state of Texas, It's illegal. They would give her information on if she wanted
Speaker 0: an abortion,
Speaker 4: stuff like that. They would give her information.
Speaker 6: Despite abortion being illegal in Texas, our findings revealed that clinics throughout the state collaborate with Planned Parenthood to aid in transporting patients, Including minors across state lines to obtain abortions.
Speaker 0: Oh, she has to travel out of state. Yeah. She can't do that at such a young age.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Do you
Speaker 0: know of any organization or anything?
Speaker 4: Black Panther.
Speaker 0: Do they help trans They would yeah. Really?
Speaker 6: Yeah. On undercover camera, the journalist also documented a conversation with a Planned Parenthood managing director in Kansas, Emily. She confirmed the procedures involved in Facilitating abortions for minors from different states.
Speaker 1: Do you get a lot of out of states coming?
Speaker 4: All the time. Yeah. We mostly see Texas and Oklahoma
Speaker 1: If you
Speaker 4: wanna go further, you gotta go to Illinois, you gotta go to Colorado.
Speaker 5: Uh-huh. The latest one is Washington DC. And we do help people get to these places.
Speaker 0: Oh, you do? Yeah. Even minors. Mhmm. That's so great.
Mhmm. So do you know people that Planned Parenthood has helped transport out of state?
Speaker 1: Oh, some of our patients. Really?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: This clip just shows that Planned Parenthood is the known Abortion
Speaker 6: provider. During our investigation, we interviewed Abby Johnson, a former director at a Texas Planned Parenthood who made headlines in 2009 when she walked Away from her lucrative 8 year career and became outspoken about what she witnessed at America's largest abortion provider. She penned a memoir entitled Unplanned, which was made into a movie of the same title. Abby reviewed our footage and provided her perspective based on her firsthand Experience.
Speaker 3: You know, whether it's shady or whether it's not, it's fine. Just send them to Planned Parenthood. Whether she's a minor, whether she's not, whether she needs to cross state lines, whether she needs it funded, she doesn't have money, whatever it is, Planned Parenthood will handle it. And that I mean, that's what Planned Parenthood's that's what they're known for.
Speaker 0: And so the provider can talk to her without the parents being here. Right?
Speaker 4: Yes. So, yeah. That's the first thing she needs to do, schedule an appointment.
Speaker 0: It's nice that she can come in here for appointments without No. Consent to credit. No. 13.
Speaker 4: 13. Let me make Sure. Yes. Tickets are without them. Great.
Great. I
Speaker 0: can come with her? That's so wonderful. So as long as I come with her And have cash.
Speaker 4: You don't really have the cash.
Speaker 0: How does she qualify without her parents' information being able?
Speaker 1: So we
Speaker 4: have a lot of plans that the government give us.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry?
Speaker 4: We have a lot of plans that the government give us.
Speaker 0: The government gives
Speaker 4: us plans on what should qualify us for. But that will be with financials. They'll be able to give you more details of the financial Right. Tax department?
Speaker 3: Taxpayer dollars in many states It's not meant to fund abortion. We know it's happening. We know that this money is crossing state We know that it's going to fund abortions in other states.
Speaker 0: They'll be able to give details for which plan that she qualifies for based upon her being underage.
Speaker 4: Underage and Yeah. Bring as much information as she can.
Speaker 0: Great.
Speaker 4: Picture ID.
Speaker 0: Picture ID. At school.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Totally. I don't have to provide, like, any documentation on related. Right? No.
Speaker 3: We know that they're being told, oh, no problem. You can have an abortion. Here's how you do it. Here's step by step. I know exactly what's happening, because this Is what we were trained to do at planned parenthood.
Speaker 4: So we can't do anything today, but This is kind of
Speaker 5: like the whole spiel for it. So what she can do is get a judicial bypass.
Speaker 6: A judicial bypass is a legal process Thus, it allows a minor to petition the court to obtain an abortion without parental involvement or consent.
Speaker 3: There's a specific organization. It's a Coaching organization for minor girls. And so if a minor girl came to us and said, I need to have an abortion, and I don't want my parents to know about it. No problem. We would put them in contact.
They knew every judge and they had a relationship with Every judge that would rubber stamp the consent for this minor to get an
Speaker 4: Then you can call this number right here, and they'll be the ones to kinda direct you because they'll have to meet with the For me first?
Speaker 0: I have to get an attorney. No.
Speaker 4: No. No. It's free. I have to meet with this attorney.
Speaker 1: Oh. Oh.
Speaker 0: Oh. She's
Speaker 5: the clerk for the design of court. This is what they're all gonna They gotta just kinda go through a whole process to get, like, a bypass of the court if
Speaker 4: we don't want parents involved.
Speaker 1: How long will this process take?
Speaker 4: It wouldn't take too long because Even on here, it tells you, like, these are required like, they're required to make these a priority.
Speaker 3: They would coach them. They would give the girls a script That she would need to read to the judge. Now this is all done via Zoom. So she never has to stand in front of a judge, nothing like that. It's all done via webcam.
So she's in front of a judge via webcam, but she's reading a script saying, My parents are going to kick me out if I don't get abortion. That may or may not be true. Every girl says the exact same thing in front of probably the exact same judge. And The judge says, okay. Sounds good.
Stamps it. You can have the abortion. The nurse or the counselor Takes her out of school, takes her out of the class, drives her to the abortion clinic. She lays on that table. She has this surgical procedure.
Hopefully, she makes it through okay, gets up, goes into recovery, that nurse Or that school counselor takes her, takes her back to school, lays on the nurses' table. Mom picks her up at 3:30. She gets in the car. She goes home. She has no idea what's happened.
Now, This is happening every day. Every single day, this is happening in our public school system. And this is happening all across the country. What's scary though is in many states Like New York, states like California, all of the most of the states up in the in the northeast, Oregon, Washington state. They don't even have to have that rubber seal because a girl at 13 years old doesn't have to have a judicial bypass.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
@PPFA In Part Two of our investigation into the nation’s largest abortion provider, undercover camera has further revealed the elaborate lengths the abortion giant (@PPFA) will go to facilitate, and help conceal, abortions for minors. READ THE FULL REPORT: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/planned-parenthood-part-two
Planned Parenthood’s Nationwide Abortion Trafficking Network Works in Tandem with Court System to “Rubber Stamp” Minor Abortions | Project Veritas
In Part Two of our investigation into the nation’s largest abortion provider, undercover camera has further revealed Planned Parenthood’s nationwide scheme to traffic minors across state lines for secret abortions.
projectveritas.com
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
"I'm going to continue to speak the truth until children are rescued, criminals are prosecuted, and the United States government no longer is putting billions of dollars to traffic children." @taraleerodas, HHS Whistleblower
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tara Rodas expresses gratitude to Aaron Stevenson and Project Veritas for their bravery in uncovering the truth about child trafficking. As an employee at the Pomona Fairplex emergency intake site, she witnessed unaccompanied children being processed and handed over to unvetted sponsors across the US. This revelation exposes a government-sponsored, taxpayer-funded child trafficking operation worth billions of dollars. Tara encourages others to come forward with information and vows to continue speaking out until children are rescued, criminals are prosecuted, and the government stops allocating millions of dollars to traffic children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Tara Rodas. And thanks to the bravery of Aaron Stevenson, and thanks to Project Veritas and James O'Keefe for publishing the story. I was sitting on the Pomona Fairplex emergency intake site processing unaccompanied children. So you may know that children were coming to this country from other countries. We were taking them into the care HHS, and then delivering them to sponsors, sponsors, unvetted sponsors throughout the United States.
So because 1 whistleblower came forward, and because 1 organization was willing to tell the truth, I was able to then uncover and report that the US government is the middleman in a large scale, multibillion dollar child trafficking operation. We literally have government sponsored, taxpayer funded child trafficking. So 1 whistleblower coming forward, telling the truth, sets in motion a cascade of things that you could never imagine. So I was very grateful for the opportunity for someone to tell the truth. And who knows, maybe one of you could be the next person to come forward.
So along with my buddy Aaron, I'm gonna continue to speak the truth until children are rescued, criminals are prosecuted, and the United States government no longer is putting 1,000,000,000 of dollars to traffic children.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
This is the video that @YouTube REMOVED https://t.co/BDOMf1xujx
Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist from Project Veritas received a search warrant from the San Bruno police department in California. The warrant was issued to retrieve the journalist's GPS data from their personal phone, specifically for the day they interviewed YouTube's Matt Halperin. The search warrant is related to a criminal investigation into potential threats of violence against an individual and business. The journalist believes that YouTube influenced the local police department to issue the warrant. This incident raises concerns about press freedom and the intimidation of journalists. Project Veritas stands by the journalist and will continue to expose the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RC Maxwell here at Project Veritas headquarters in New York about to talk to one of our journalists who has just been issued a search warrant. For questioning YouTube's global head of trust and safety and vice president Matt Halperin asked to why our reporting on Pfizer was taken down. From a press freedom perspective, this is obviously very concerning.
Speaker 1: You know, after going to California to ask questions to Matt Halpern, a few days after we did the street interview with him. I checked my mailbox, and I've got a letter from San Bruno police department, which is, You know, the police department in the same city that YouTube is headquartered in, San Bruno, California. And I opened the letter, and it's a notice of a search warrant to retrieve my GPS data from my personal phone to track my whereabouts between certain time frames on the very day that we interviewed Matt Halpern. The search warrant is in reference to a criminal investigation that they are conducting related to Potential threats of violence against an individual and business.
Speaker 0: So you're on a public street doing your job as a journalist, operating reading within the bounds of the law.
Speaker 1: What's really interesting about this search warrant, why the details matter is because Matt Halperin lives in Menlo Park, barked. But the search warrant is from San Bruno, which is way further north. And the only thing I'm left to be to to deduce from this is that this is YouTube Throwing their weight around and throwing their influence around to a local police department that's in their city where they're headquartered, which is San Bruno.
Speaker 0: I mean, we have a tech executive who has been under criticism forebanning one of the most viewed videos of 2023. And you attempting to ask a question filed this, resulting within 5 days of your phone records being accessed by a local called police department. That is the speed of a terrorist investigation or a homeland security investigation where lives are at risk. This is this is astonishing.
Speaker 1: California has a record of trying to intimidate journalists. Local law enforcement trying to
Speaker 0: intimidate Well, you know everyone here at HQ has your back. Absolutely. We will walk in the fire with you to continue exposing this truth. Thank
Speaker 1: you.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING: @YouTube Insider leaks "Urgent Guidance" document sent to employees on how to handle the Project Veritas @pfizer #DirectedEvolution video "Effective immediately as of 27 January 2023" "Violates the COVID-19 misinformation policy"
@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas
BREAKING: @Pfizer Exploring "Mutating" COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines "Don't tell anyone this...There is a risk...have to be very controlled to make sure this virus you mutate doesn't create something...the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest." #DirectedEvolution
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer is considering mutating the COVID virus to create new vaccines, but they don't want the public to know. They are conducting experiments on live monkeys to study the virus and its mutations. Pfizer believes that by controlling the mutations in their labs, they can develop vaccines for new variants before they even emerge in nature. This would be a lucrative business model for them. The pharmaceutical industry has a revolving door with government officials, which benefits the industry but is bad for everyone else. The comments made by Pfizer's Jordan Walker show a lack of moral compass and a disregard for public health. Pfizer believes it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus and can bypass laws. This is an ongoing story that needs attention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?
Speaker 1: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No. Don't tell anyone the public. We have public show on Twitter. We have public show on Twitter.
We have public show
Speaker 2: on Twitter. We're scoring, like, not you
Speaker 1: know how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it
Speaker 3: hard So so we could both we
Speaker 1: could create unduly developed new vaccines. Right? So we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk to have, like as you could imagine, no one wants to be Having a pharma company mutating viruses. We're, like, very controlled to make sure that those virus that you mutate doesn't create something like, you know, It goes everywhere.
It's so crazy. It's the way that the virus started. It looked at it. To be honest, like, it's it is
Speaker 4: no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere.
Speaker 1: Like Yeah.
Speaker 5: I know. Meet Jordan Tristan Walker, a director of research and development strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning At Pfizer,
Speaker 0: it sounds like gain a function to me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's a little bit different. I think it's different. It's like this. Function research of the viruses, like Yeah.
They recommend not. But you do, like, these, like, selected directional mutations to try to see if you make more protein. Yeah. So there there is research I'm learning about that. I don't know how that's gonna work.
There are not being more outbreaks to take Jesus first.
Speaker 6: The gentleman seems to have absolutely No moral compass at all.
Speaker 1: Everyone's at the door for all government officials. It's pretty good for the industry, to be honest. Yeah. It's bad for everyone else in America.
Speaker 0: Why is it bad for everybody else?
Speaker 1: Is this the regulators who have approved our drugs? You know, that once they're shopping a regular, they They wanna go work for the company, then I gotta be as hard as I'm talking.
Speaker 7: You know, we're hearing this off.
Speaker 6: If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these Huge decisions that risk global public health. It's profoundly corrupt.
Speaker 0: What is Pfizer doing, I guess, to optimize, You know, the vaccines now.
Speaker 1: Oh, we actually have a meeting about that today, so there's a lot. Really? They're doing nothing. I don't know if I should say this.
Speaker 5: Our undercover journalist asked Walker how Pfizer is handling the fact that their COVID vaccines are ineffective against Virus variance. What he said is disturbing. Listen to this.
Speaker 2: We're exploring, like, not you know
Speaker 1: how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just we're explaining is, like, why don't we just mutate it hard to sell
Speaker 3: so we could put we could create
Speaker 1: actively develop group actions. Right? So we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk. Because, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a on a company mutating fucking viruses.
Yeah. Okay. Like, so we wanna do this? So that's, like, one of these they're considering. Okay.
For, like, the future, like, maybe we can, like, Great. New versions of the vaccines and things like that.
Speaker 0: Okay. So Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?
Speaker 1: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No. That's why it was a thought that came up in a meeting and we're like, why why do we not? It was like, we're gonna consider A little more attention. Okay.
Not exactly, actually. Right? We're like, wait a minute. Like, people are like, shit.
Speaker 5: That's right. It appears that Pfizer is internally discussing the Possibility of mutating the COVID virus themselves in order to tailor a vaccine to sell to the public. Listen to Walker describe in detail just how they would Conduct such a scientific experiment first in living animals.
Speaker 1: I'm sure I'm talking about it. Yeah. Okay. Right? So, the way it would work is, like, we put them in the virus in these monkeys.
Okay. And then we successively, like, cause them to keep infecting each other. And we collect several samples from them, and then the ones that are more infectious, like the virus, we'll put them in another monkey, You just constantly actively mutate it. That's one way. Okay.
Or you can even do, like, directed, like, simulation, which, like, we should not prefer. And then you just sample what the different, like, like, proteins on the surface of the virus look like over time. Okay. So then you can see the mutation that you can have forces and mutate in a certain way you want. Okay.
Because you have to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate does occur in something like, it goes everywhere. Something crazy. It's the way that the virus started, it moved out of there. To be honest, like, it's it's nuisance that
Speaker 4: this virus walked out of nowhere.
Speaker 1: Like Yeah.
Speaker 5: I know. COVID virus experimentation on live monkeys? This is unethical, to say the least. And Walker describes those experiments as if they are ongoing and not simply a hypothetical discussion.
Speaker 0: So, I mean, when is Pfizer gonna implement the mutation of all these viruses?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Look at all the experiments we got.
Speaker 0: Because this is like Something we're dying. Right? It sounds like gain a function to me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Totally different. I think it's different. Like, this Direct evolution? Directed evolution.
Speaker 0: Directed evolution. Okay. Well, so, I mean, is that what it is? Maybe. I I Or
Speaker 1: you're not supposed to gain function when you search for the viruses, like, they rather not. But you do, like, these, like, selected There are some mutations to try and see if we can get more COVID? Yeah. So there there is research online about that. I don't know how that's gonna work.
There are not gonna be any more outbreaks, just like Jesus Christ.
Speaker 0: So, tell me more, like, what's developing with the whole virus mutation process?
Speaker 1: Well, they're still conducting the experiments on it, but, it seems like from the herd, they're kinda optimizing it, but if they're gonna Both of them are very cautious, like, you know Right. Obviously don't wanna cut it accelerate it too much. Yeah. But I think they also just try to do it as an exploratory thing because you I don't wanna advertise that entirely. Put out future mutations.
Speaker 0: So did that did the whole virus mutation thing, like, come from your executive, Sarah? No, no, no. That came from like,
Speaker 1: we have like chief scientific officers in like the other divisions.
Speaker 5: In a subsequent meeting, our undercover journalist asked if this type of gain of function research is already being Studied at Pfizer. But no, as long as it's called directed evolution, Pfizer's in the clear.
Speaker 0: What's the goal? Know. Well, there's lots of doing that.
Speaker 1: So probably what they wanna do is, like, to try to figure out to some extent, try to figure out, like you know, there's all these new strains of variants that just Why don't we try to, like, catch them before they pop up in nature and we can develop a vaccine for prophylaxis for, like, new variants? Yeah. So that's why they're thinking, like, if we do it in control of their labs, then we say, oh, this is a methytoke. And so they say it comes out later on, like, in the public, we already have a vaccine kind of working on.
Speaker 0: Oh my god. That's perfect. Like, isn't that, like, The best business model though? Like,
Speaker 1: just control
Speaker 0: nature before nature even happens itself. Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. If it works. What do you mean if it works? Because, like, sometimes, like, we just need mutations to pop up.
Right? We're not prepared for it. Like, with Delta or Omicron Right. And things like that. So Who knows?
I mean, either way, it's gonna be a cash cow. COVID is probably a cash cow for us for a while going forward.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I obviously like Well, I think the whole, you know, I think the whole, like, research of the viruses and mutating it, like, Would be the ultimate, like, cash cow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It would be perfect.
Speaker 5: Now you would think that creating viruses to sell the vaccine would be illegal, But no, the pharmaceutical industry, as Walker puts it, is a revolving door for all government officials. Quote.
Speaker 1: I don't know if they're out the door for all government officials. Wow. Yeah. For any industry, though. So, like, in the pharma industry, all the government, officials who, like, you're you're at drugs, Unless they come work for a problem with peace.
Like, the military, like, all the, like, army defense, like, government officials eventually go work for the defense company afterwards.
Speaker 0: How do you feel about that revolving More like
Speaker 1: it's been good for the industry, to be honest. Yeah. Yeah. It's bad for everyone else in America.
Speaker 0: Why is it bad for everybody else?
Speaker 1: Because it's the regulators who have approved our drugs. You know that once they're shopping regularly, they wanna go work for the company, then I gotta be as hard for the company.
Speaker 7: You know, we're getting their jobs. Right.
Speaker 5: We talked to doctor Robert Malone, Physician, scientist, and author to get his take on the comments made by Jordan Walker.
Speaker 6: You're gaining function. You're creating a new function in virus 1 by adding elements from virus 2, infecting 1 monkey and then another monkey. That's called serial passage. That appears to have been one of the technologies deployed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the humanized mouse Strains that I believe were obtained from, EcoHealth Alliance. That's an example of directed evolution.
The gentleman seems to have Absolutely no moral compass at all about what he's doing. The hubris and arrogance and immaturity, If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these huge decisions that risk global public health with such a Casual disregard for the human toll. It's profoundly corrupt in terms of would it be feasible For Pfizer to circumvent international or national law, I think that is undeniable. And the gentleman in your investigative work Has clearly indicated that Pfizer believes that it has successfully captured The regulatory apparatus of the United States government and presumably worldwide, Pfizer has completed regulatory capture, He's quite proud of it.
Speaker 5: With governments turning a blind eye and Pfizer hiding information from the public, this is an ongoing story. Be brave. Do something. Spread these videos and stay tuned.