TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @PrometheanActn
@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action
🚨 While everyone watched Venezuela, Trump quietly put CANADA in the crosshairs. Why? Because this isn't regime change—it's a strike on the City of London's offshore banking empire that's been laundering cartel money for 50 years. Even MI6 admits this is something new. https://t.co/2hDYjim15f
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that while global focus is on Venezuela, Mexico, Cuba, and Colombia, Donald Trump quietly put Canada in the hot seat, presenting the Venezuelan operation as an opening salvo against the British empire. He frames Trump’s actions as not about Maduro alone but as a broader assault on imperial structures.
Speaker 1 discusses the perceived death toll from drugs and asserts a real number of 300,000, noting drugs entering primarily through the southern border and also through Canada, implying this is part of a wider systemic issue.
Speaker 0 notes that mainstream headlines focus on familiar targets, while the Toronto Globe and Mail editorially warns that Venezuela’s fate is a warning to Canada. The New York Times is described as framing this as another regime change operation from the Bush era that will split the MAGA movement, with Marjorie Taylor Greene contributing to that narrative. The Democratic Party is said to be shrieking about Trump’s actions, with some calling for impeachment. Former British MI6 head John Bolton is cited as recognizing that the operation is not a regime change.
Speaker 0 and others present the view that this is a surgical strike against the British empire’s irregular warfare and the nexus of narcotics trafficking, terrorism, and the London-centered banking system. Susan Kokinda introduces herself as someone who has tracked offshore banking since the 1970s and claims this is the first time someone is taking on that system, namely Donald Trump, urging viewers to engage with Promethean Action for deeper analysis.
Speaker 2 clarifies the big picture: there is not a war against Venezuela, but a war against drug trafficking organizations, arguing that the largest oil reserves are controlled by adversaries of the United States and misappropriated by oligarchs, including in Venezuela. The speaker emphasizes that the target is oligarchs and drug trafficking organizations, not socialism or communism.
Speaker 0 connects oligarchs and drug trafficking with the British empire, describing Canada as run by the empire’s central bankers (notably Mark Carney) and as a major political outpost in North America used for drug trafficking, illegal immigration, and terrorism. This frame contrasts Trump’s actions with the cartels and highlights Canada’s role as part of the broader imperial apparatus.
Speaker 3 (Sir John Soros) cautions against calling it regime change, noting Maduro has been abducted and taken to the U.S. to stand trial, but saying the army remains in power and the regime’s legal structures persist. He acknowledges the operation is not the same as Iraq’s regime change and notes Trump’s reluctance to deploy large-scale ground forces. John Bolton adds that Maduro has been removed from power, but the regime remains, and there is ambiguity about Trump’s thinking regarding Machado.
Speaker 0 reiterates that this is not regime change but irregular warfare, with the United States pushing back against the empire’s rules-based order. The narrative argues that Trump is targeting the offshore banking system that finances terrorism, cartels, and the destruction of sovereign nations, including the London-centered financial network and its secrecy jurisdictions established in the 1960s.
Prominent voices, including Tom Luongo and Crypto Rich, are cited to support the view that the British empire’s financial system and the rules-based order have long protected nonstate actors, NGOs, and cartels, and that Trump’s actions represent breaking those rules to defeat the imperial system. The piece frames the operation as the United States taking on irregular warfare and challenging the offshore financial framework that underpins global illicit activities, including narcotics trafficking and terrorism.
Bottom line presented: Trump has launched a major offensive against the city of London’s offshore banking system and has targeted Canada as part of this broader strategy, signaling a shift from conventional regime-change thinking to irregular warfare against imperial financial and geopolitical structures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While the entire world is focused on Venezuela and Mexico and Cuba and Colombia, Donald Trump just quietly put Canada in the hot seat. Why? Because the operation in Caracas isn't just about Maduro. It's an opening salvo against the British empire. Here's what the president said.
Speaker 1: So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know.
Speaker 0: But you're not supposed to notice that. The headlines covering that same press conference are focused on the usual targets like this one in the New York Post. But while the empire's American propaganda arms want you focused on those usual suspects, By Sunday, the Canadians had figured out what I just told you. The editorial board of the Toronto Globe and Mail announced in their Sunday editorial that Venezuela's fate is a warning to Canada. Meanwhile, the rest of the narrative is being played out by the press like the New York Times, which says that this is another regime change operation out of the Bush playbook and that it's going to split the MAGA movement.
And, of course, the New York Times favorite new political figure, Marjorie Taylor Greene, played her part in feeding into the MAGA split narrative. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party is playing its assigned role in the narrative, shrieking about Trump's actions, and some are already calling for his impeachment. But here's where it gets interesting. Some of Trump's opponents, like the former head of Britain's MI six and Walrus man, John Bolton, immediately recognized that what The US did in Venezuela was not a regime change operation. They're actually onto something.
It isn't regime change. It's a surgical strike against the British empire's irregular warfare and a key component of that, which we have long called doping, the nexus of narcotics trafficking, terrorism, and the city of London centered banking system. And today, we're gonna break that down. I'm Susan Kokinda. I've been tracking this since the nineteen seventies, watching how the offshore banking operation was set up to sidestep regulation, sovereignty, and law enforcement.
And I'm here to tell you that for the first time, someone is taking that on, and it's Donald Trump. So if this sounds like your kind of fight, please hit those like, share, and subscribe buttons so we can reach more people. Here's what we're gonna cover today. First, it's not regime change, and the empire knows it. Second, how the empire's operations of dirty money is now in the crosshair, and the Russians know it, and how Trump is deploying to defeat all of these imperial operations.
So let's clear up the biggest misconception right now. Many former MAGA allies, Candace Owens, Marjorie Taylor Greene, are screaming that this is neocon regime change two point o. They're just looking at the surface or outright lying. But listen to secretary of state Marco Rubio. He told us exactly what this is.
I wanna start with this big picture question. Is The United States now at war with Venezuela?
Speaker 2: There's not a war. I mean, what's we are a war against drug trafficking organizations. It's not a war against Venezuela. You cannot continue to have the largest oil reserves, you know, in the world under under the control of adversaries of The United States, not benefiting the people of Venezuela and stolen stolen by a handful of oligarchs around the world, including inside of Venezuela, but not benefiting the people of that country. Did you catch that?
He didn't blame socialism.
Speaker 0: He didn't blame communism. He blamed oligarchs and drug trafficking organizations. Now that takes us back to Trump and his targeting of Canada, which no one seems to wanna talk about. Because when you put the words oligarchs and drug trafficking organizations in the same context, you aren't just talking about the cartels in Mexico or Colombia. You're talking about key characteristics of the British empire, which is the epitome of oligarchy.
Or to put it another way, the rule of the few, which is what oligarchy means. And when it comes to drug trafficking organizations, the British empire has been the most notorious entity in the world when it comes to making money off of drug trafficking, going back over two hundred years, including the notorious opium wars of the nineteenth century. This has never stopped. It's just taken a new form. And that's the importance of Canada in this picture.
It is run by the empire's favorite central banker, Mark Carney, and it is the major political outpost for the crown in North America, used for drug trafficking, as the president mentioned, illegal immigration, and terrorism. Unlike, say, someone like Mexican president Claudia Scheinbaum, whom Trump accurately characterized as terrified of the cartels, Carney has actually facilitated the financing arm of the cartels in his former role as the head of the Bank of England. While no one else is picking up on the Canada angle, some interesting folks who are not exactly Trump supporters are picking up on another aspect of this, on the fact that what The US did in Venezuela is not regime change. Let's start with the former head of MI six, sir John Soros. He isn't clutching his pearls about democracy.
He recognizes this for what it is. What Trump did is a demonstration of raw power that bypasses the empire's rules based order.
Speaker 3: Well, first of all, I think I'd be cautious about using the phrase regime change. The Americans have abducted the leader of of Venezuela, Maduro, and taken him to The US to stand trial, but they are now already dealing with the regime. The army remains in power. The the legal structures of the regime remain unchanged, and they're already talking to Dulce Rodriguez, the vice president who's been sworn in as the new president of Venezuela and distance themselves from the opposition. So this isn't the sort of regime change of the sort that we saw in Iraq, and it's commensurate with the, with the, clear reluctance by Trump to put large scale forces on the ground.
Speaker 0: Sir John admitted this operation is new territory. He noted that Washington is already dealing with Maduro's successors and that the structures of the country remain. He knows this isn't Iraq. It isn't Tony Blair's regime change. It's something else, and he's not alone.
Here's John Bolton.
Speaker 4: But let's be clear. There's a big difference between getting Maduro and removing the regime. Right now, facts are scarce. That's for sure. But the regime is still in power.
And Trump inexplicably today at his news conference took a shot at the Nobel Peace Prize winning leader of Venezuela's opposition, missus Machado, said she didn't have the trust of the Venezuelan people. So I think there's a lot of, lack of clarity to say the least in Trump's thinking on this. And it would be a hollow victory indeed if we, snatched Maduro but left his regime in place.
Speaker 0: When MI six and John Bolton are admitting that this is not standard regime change and Trump's allies are confused, you know you're watching a higher level of warfare. And this is exactly why you need to be plugged into Promethean action. While so called MAGA influencers are screaming regime change, but the former head of MI six is calmly explaining that this is something entirely different, who do you think actually understands what's happening? We've been tracking British imperial operations in irregular warfare for decades. We don't react.
We don't chase headlines. We understand the enemy's playbook because we've studied it and fought it since the nineteen seventies. So if you're tired of being confused by people who you think are on your side, subscribe to our free newsletter at Promethean Action. We'll help you see what Trump is actually doing so you can defend it and explain it to others. So head on over to Promethean Action and subscribe to our free newsletter.
Now here's what Trump is really going after. If this is a war on drug trafficking organizations and oligarchs, as Rubio says, then it is automatically a war on the global banking system because you can't separate the two. The target isn't just jungle labs and drug boats. It's the city of London. Let's remember where Venezuela is.
It borders The Caribbean. What else is in The Caribbean? The origin point for the infamous system of offshore banking established directly by the British. Back in 1960, the largest banking houses in London, working in partnership with the government and the exchequer, established 14 completely secretive secrecy jurisdictions. These are the offshore banking centers that now hold between $50 and 75,000,000,000,000 with all 50 of the world's largest banks operating within them.
These offshore centers exist outside the control of sovereign governments. They're secret, they're unregulated, and they facilitate illegal activity. What we once had, a legitimate regulated banking system has been transformed into a criminal enterprise. And interestingly, the Russians have known this for years and have been more vociferous about it than any Western government. In a 2014 speech, Viktor Ivanov, then Russia's top drug enforcement official, laid it out clearly in a Moscow conference.
He said, this allows us to confidently assert that narco money is the foundation of the modern financial system. It is not surprising that during the first peak of the financial crisis of two thousand eight, two thousand nine, Antonio Costa from the UN announced that the top banks in the world dumped in around $352,000,000,000 of narco dollars to use for interbank borrowing to address the critical shortage of liquidity. And he goes on to make clear that the global financial system needs drug money to survive. The very existence of the global financial bubble, he said, is based on precisely this opportunity for banks to attract liquid narco money. In fact, this garbage fertilizes the present economic system.
Now this is a good time to remember that treasury secretary Scott Bessent recently commented that 50% of his job involves issues of national security. Now think about it. Since we started targeting drug boats and lighting up the communications channels of the cartels and their financiers, I bet treasury secretary Besant has been just as busy as Pete Hegseth. Now Venezuela doesn't have to be a major producer of drugs. It's the facilitator for the spider web of narcotics, illegal immigration, and terrorism.
And it's well known that Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Iranian revolutionary guard operate out of Venezuela. So think about the implications. Trump's moves on Venezuela hits at this nexus, and it effectively attacks the liquidity of the offshore banking system established by the British in the nineteen sixties. He's cutting off the flow of fertilizer to the globalist oligarchs. And this brings us to the real issue, which is the fact that we are fighting not regular warfare, but irregular warfare.
For decades, the British Empire and globalist banks have waged war on us using nonstate actors, NGOs, terrorists, cartels, all of which are protected by their rules based international order. A couple of my friends discussed this when they summed up their discussion on Venezuela. Here's what Crypto Rich and Tom Luongo said.
Speaker 5: So here's Trump coming along, breaking the rules, which he has to do in order to defeat the international banking cartel, which is spawned out of the city of London.
Speaker 6: Well, you can't play by their rules when their rules based order is all based on
Speaker 5: It favors them.
Speaker 6: It favors them. They set the game board up. You want to beat somebody, you can't play the game by their rules. It's basic Sun Tzu. Never fight on a ground prepared by your enemy.
Speaker 0: Tom's right. You can't defend your nation if you play by their rules. And the new national security strategy, which Rubio brought up in the above interview, says so. Just a reminder, here's what the national security strategy says about the elite's rules. They lashed American policy to a network of international institutions, some of which were driven by outright anti Americanism and many by a transnationalism that explicitly seeks to dissolve individual state sovereignty.
So on behalf of all sovereign nations, Trump has taken the fight directly to those institutions, both the so called legitimate ones like USAID, the NGOs, the nonprofits, the universities, and the illegitimate side, the cartels, the criminal empires, and their financiers, were no longer playing by the rules of the rules based order. And don't forget, it was Canada's Mark Kearney who said that just a few months ago. The old world of steady expansion of rules based liberalized trade and investment, that world is gone. This is what this administration is taking on in their whole of government approach. No.
It isn't regime change. It's the recognition that this is irregular warfare. And for the first time in the entire postwar period, The United States is actually fighting back. So here's the bottom line. While the talking heads and influencers are screaming about regime change and splitting MAGA, Donald Trump just declared war on the financial backbone of the British empire.
He's targeting the offshore banking system that has funded terrorism, cartels, and the destruction of sovereign nations for over fifty years. And he's just targeted Canada for good measure. The most ironic part, the enemy understands what Trump is doing better than many of his supposed allies. Sir John SARS and John Bolton see it. And one of the other superpowers, Russia, has been warning about this for decades.
But too many in the MAGA movement are stuck arguing about whether this is another neocon regime change instead of recognizing that Trump has just launched the biggest offensive against the city of London since maybe the American Revolution. This is why we exist. Promethean action has been in this fight since the 1970s. We've exposed the offshore banking apparatus. We've been warning about British irregular warfare when everyone else thought we were crazy.
Now Trump is doing what we've been advocating for decades, and we're here to make sure that you understand it so that you can defend it and amplify it. Go over to the Promethean Action website and subscribe to our free newsletter. Become a paying member. Support us financially. And check out our resources.
This has been your Monday brief. Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.
@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action
🚨 Why is the British Empire in full panic mode? It's not about missiles. It's about a "boring" document that just ended their financial control over America. NATO generals are screaming for war. MI6 is coming out of the shadows. Russia is calling them out. https://t.co/OlMsZF1qfk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion frames the current global confrontation as driven less by ideology or democracy and more by an economic battle centered on financial control. The speakers argue that the British establishment is panicking not about territory or missiles, but because a Quietly released Washington document signals the end of London’s ability to siphon money from the American economy. This document, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) 2025 annual report, is said to prioritize economic stability and household income over protecting the financial system that underpins “the casino,” and it is described as revolutionary in shifting policy away from saving “financial parasites” toward supporting the real economy.
Key points include:
- The premise that London fears a shift in U.S. policy that places people and economic growth first, not globalist or imperial financial interests. The two documents released within a week—the FSOC 2025 report and the administration’s national security strategy—are said to reassert that American principles will govern, not imperial ones.
- Susan Kokinda argues that this shift exposes a strategic clash: London’s fear is the end of its economic model’s dominance, not a conventional military threat.
- The war in Ukraine is recast as a theater where Trump’s administration is pushing a new economic and geopolitical strategy. Trump’s team is said to be telling Zelensky to negotiate on territory or risk losing security guarantees, signaling a move away from a rigid transatlantic alliance toward recognizing Russia’s interests and seeking peace.
- Britain, according to the analysis, is openly pushing for continued conflict. A Sky News interview with a British general is cited as evidence that the UK is preparing its population for war rather than advocating peace.
- Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service is presented as corroborating that the UK is undermining Trump’s peace efforts and pressuring the EU to seize Russian assets to fund Ukraine and derail a U.S.-led settlement.
- The FSOC reform is tied to a broader reshaping of the U.S. economy, with the participation of influential figures such as Lord Peter Mandelson and Larry Summers in shaping post-2008 financial policy (Dodd-Frank) and its alleged pivot toward protecting American households rather than financial centers.
- The administration’s domestic focus targets four alleged cartels that are viewed as pillars of the imperial financialized system: beef cartels, big pharma and insurance, housing, and narco trafficking. The claim is that these sectors drain resources from the public and fuel the financial system’s dominance.
- Beef, pharma, housing, and drugs are presented as extraction and control mechanisms of the British system, with reforms aimed at breaking these up described as both economic and strategic blows to the empire.
- The narrator contends that stopping these economic mechanisms can prevent wars sustained by financial interests, and that Trump’s policies are reviving American manufacturing, builders, and producers.
Supporting details highlight instances where political figures frame policy as protecting working Americans—food security, healthcare affordability, and housing stability—while linking these goals to a broader strategy against international financial power structures. The overarching claim is that the real war behind the shooting war is economic, and the British system cannot survive a successful American pivot toward prioritizing people and real economy over financial elites. The update closes by urging readers to understand the economic war behind geopolitical conflict and to engage with Promethean Action for more analysis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The British empire is panicked. NATO chiefs, British generals, even the head of MI six coming out of the shadows, all screaming for escalation with Russia. They want you to look at the missiles. They want you to think that this is about territory or democracy. Well, it's not.
They're not afraid of Russia. They're afraid of a PDF file released quietly in Washington last week, which signals the silent assassination of their entire financial model. The weapon that is terrifying London isn't a hypersonic missile. It's this. Now it sounds boring.
It looks bureaucratic. But inside these pages is the end of the city of London's mandate to loot the American economy. Don't let the name fool you. This is the economic equivalent of a declaration of war on the financier elite. It declares that from now on, people and economic growth come first, not financial parasites.
And it comes right on the heels of the administration's national security strategy, which declares that sovereign nations come first, not globalist institutions. These were released within a week of each other, and these two documents reassert that American principles will now govern us, not imperial principles. I'm Susan Kokinda. This has been a battle that I've been part of since the nineteen seventies. But I've seen how the British start wars and create narratives to keep you in the dark.
It's time for all of this to come into the light, and that's what we're gonna do today. But before I get to that, please like, share, and subscribe to this channel and help us extend our reach. So here's what we're gonna cover today. How London's panic is out in the open, and the Russians know it. What Trump's new economic strategy is, people, not bankers, first.
And that phase one of that strategy is the war against the cartels. So Trump's current pressure campaign on Ukraine is forcing Europe and, in particular, the British right out in the open, so open that they're telling their people to prepare for war. Over the past week, Trump has been brutally honest with Zelensky. You're losing. You need to hold elections.
And, oh, by the way, you're completely corrupt. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump team is telling Zelensky, either you negotiate on territory or you get no security guarantees. Now this also reflects the reality of Trump's new national security strategy that I covered last week. Trump is no longer operating under the transatlantic alliance playbook. As one dispirited European diplomat blurted out at a DC Christmas party, the Western alliance is over.
The relationship will never be the same again. So the split is out in the open, and Trump is pushing a negotiated settlement which recognizes Russia's legitimate interests. But the Europeans keep egging Zelensky to continue the war, and the British are the most overt. Look at this general on Sky News. He didn't talk about peace.
He warned that The United Kingdom's sons and daughters need to be ready to fight.
Speaker 1: Perhaps the most obvious impact on all of us will be the cost of building this resilience. Sons and daughters, colleagues, veterans will all have a part to play, to build, to serve, and if necessary, to fight. And more families will know what sacrifice for our nation means.
Speaker 0: And it's not just the military. The new head of MI six, whose grandfather, by the way, was on the side of the Ukrainian Nazis, warned, we are now operating in a space between peace and war. We all continue to face the menace of an aggressive expansionist and revisionist Russia seeking to subjugate Ukraine and harass NATO. But Putin should be in no doubt our support is enduring. The pressure we apply on Ukraine's behalf will be sustained.
Guess who else sees that it is the British who are keeping the war going? Russia's foreign intelligence service, and they're saying the quiet part out loud as this headline shows. That they say that it's The United Kingdom which is undermining Trump's Ukraine peace efforts. And they also report that The United Kingdom has pushed the European Union to seize Russian assets not just to fund Ukraine, but to kill any US led settlement. And they also report that it's The United States which was opposed to that.
So the real strategic battle lines have not been this clear in a century. Britain is pushing war. The United States is pushing peace, and Russia is fingering the British. Now we've established that the British are openly preparing for war while Trump pushes peace. But here's where most coverage stops and where we're just getting started.
The real question is why are they so desperate? What makes the British establishment willing to risk their own sons and daughters in a shooting war with a nuclear power? It's not ideology. It's not democracy. It's something much more concrete and much more vulnerable.
Because when the empire starts talking openly about war, it's because they're losing economic control. Now if you wanna understand the economic war behind the shooting war, I want you to go to Promethean action and subscribe to our free newsletter because we don't just show you the battlefield that most people miss. We show you how to win the war. Because what I'm about to show you next is the document that has London more terrified than they are of any Russians. It's the Financial Stability Oversight Council 2025 annual report.
For decades, financial stability in The United States has meant one thing. Save the big money center banks at all costs, bail out Wall Street, protect the derivatives markets. Meanwhile, the real economy, manufacturing, wages, household income, this is all sacrificed to keep the casino running. But the 2025 FSOC report flips this on its head. It explicitly prioritizes economic stability and security and household income stability over the financial system.
Treasury Secretary Bessent drilled down on that when he addressed the Financial Stability Oversight Council on December 11. He said, the twin priorities of economic growth and economic security will guide the council's future approach to identifying priorities. Now remember that, twin priorities of economic growth and security. Then in his chairperson's letter of introduction, Bessent said, economic security requires The US financial system to reliably provide the resources necessary to enable the real economy to support domestic production capacity, American standard of living, and our core values. And the report also announces the creation of a new household resiliency working group to give priority to people in households, not just financial entities.
Now a normal person would think that all these things are no brainers. That's what a government should be doing. But here's the brutal truth. That hasn't been the policy of the FSOC. Its policy has been to save the financial parasites.
So this report is as revolutionary as the new national security strategy. And to understand just how revolutionary this financial report is, you need to know where the FSOC came from. And here's something that should get your blood boiling. Who was deeply involved in the policy fights over the shape of the post two thousand eight crash world when Dodd Frank was being shaped. Lord Peter Mandelson in his role as EU trade commissioner and Larry Summers, Obama's national economic council director.
Lord Mandelson, Tony Blair's right hand man, one of the most connected figures in the city of London, and until recently, Britain's ambassador to the Trump administration before he was sacked because of his Epstein ties. And Larry Summers, who was just outed for his Epstein connections and had to resign from his position at Harvard. So for all those people who have wanted to see the names in the Epstein files, here's two pretty big ones, Mandelson and Summers, key architects of Dodd Frank, which protected the offshore British controlled financial model. And now the FSOC, the institution they created to protect their financial power, is being retooled to grow the real economy and protect American households. Coincidence?
You decide. But this new report is just part of a total reshaping of The US economy along these people first lines. Yesterday, vice president Vance spoke in Pennsylvania about what the Trump administration is doing for American families.
Speaker 2: I remember what it's like when you have to choose between putting food on the table or getting the prescription that you need to stay healthy. And that is not a life that Donald Trump or I want for the citizens in the greatest country in the world. We don't want a single parent or grandparent to have to look at their checking account and decide whether they're gonna buy food or whether they're gonna buy medicine this month. We are fighting for you every single day.
Speaker 0: Now in there, JD hit two critical pain points, food and health care. And add to that housing, and you immediately run into the bigs, big ag, big pharma, big finance. In other words, the cartels. Cartels are a cornerstone of an imperial financialized system where real economic activity is sacrificed to feed a financial income stream that feeds the mega institutions. And the result is inflation, a hollowed out economy, and no middle class.
And that's what this administration is taking head on in critical areas. Start with food. The administration has targeted the beef cartels. Peter Navarro just did a very powerful one minute video on X explaining how four massive conglomerates, many with deep foreign ties, have controlled over 80% of our beef supply. They underpay the rancher, overcharge you at the grocery store, and that's the definition of a colonial economic policy.
The new directive from the administration targets this monopoly directly, treating food security as national security. The second target is big pharma and the insurance companies. This is the crown jewel of a financialized economy. They don't produce health. They produce bills.
Trump and the team led by RFK junior have taken on big pharma like no one ever has, and Trump minces no words when it comes to the insurance companies. Here's how Vance put it yesterday.
Speaker 2: One of the things the president has said is we have the weirdest health insurance system in the world where we tax money from all these great Americans out here, and then we give boatloads of money to the insurance companies. Why don't we give that money to the American people and let them buy insurance that works for them and their families?
Speaker 0: Third, housing. The FSOC report makes it clear. Household income stability is the goal, but you can't have stable households when BlackRock and foreign hedge funds are buying up entire neighborhoods to turn America into a nation of renters. And the administration has compared the big homebuilding companies to OPEC and challenged them to start building. And finally, the most dangerous cartel of all, the narco trafficking cartel.
Now it would take a whole broadcast in itself, but the important thing to remember is that all of Trump's actions, declaring fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction, hitting the Venezuelan drugboats, and everything else he's doing on this front, this doesn't just hit at the tragic consequences of drugs. This goes straight at the trillions of dollars of dirty money, which keeps the city of London centered financial system afloat. See the pattern? Beef, pharma, housing, dope. These aren't just industries, legal or otherwise.
They are extraction and control mechanisms of the British system. And breaking them up isn't just good economics. It's a strategic blow to the empire. So when you see the headlines about World War three, don't just look at missiles. Look at the money.
When you hear British spooks preparing the population for war, understand what they're really defending, a centuries old system of financial control that is dying. The 2025 FSOC report is a declaration. It says we're done prioritizing your casinos over our people. And it partners with the national security strategy, which declares that we're done sacrificing our manufacturing base to your free trade doctrine. Trump isn't just stopping a war in Ukraine.
He's stopping the mechanism that creates those wars, and he's reviving the American system of builders, producers, and creators. The British Empire, whether you call it the city of London, Davos, or the rules based order, cannot survive that revival. This is the economic war behind the shooting war, and it's a war the British establishment cannot afford to lose. Because if they do, it's game over. This is why you need to join Promethean Action as a subscriber or a paying member.
We're building a movement to understand this fight and a movement that knows how to win it. The American people are waking up. Blue collar workers are seeing the biggest wage growth in sixty years. Steel towns left for dead are roaring back to life. And the old lies that we need foreign wars to be prosperous and that we need to offshore our jobs to be competitive are finally crumbling.
And once you see the truth, you can't unsee it. So this has been your midweek update. Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.
@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action
🚨 EXPOSED: Five months before the 2020 election, military intelligence & political elites secretly war-gamed how to jail Trump and destroy his movement. @MikeBenzCyber and @BarbaraMBoyd the Transition Integrity Project conspiracy they don't want you to know about. Watch now: https://t.co/oFJRFhJDpl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated.
The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response.
In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort.
The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So five months before the election, the highest levels of military intelligence and political power in The United States Of America all got together, did a secret war game to to find a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square, but that they also needed a reason to throw Trump and his family in jail, and they needed a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power because they will not automatically demobilize when Trump leaves office, and they can't be in this country anymore. We need a way to mass arrest them.
Speaker 1: That's Mike Benz on Saturday outlining in detail a big chunk of the conspiracy that put Joe Biden in office. It involved a group which most people have never heard of, the transition integrity project. And I share Mike Bens' obsession with their June twenty twenty war game. I'm Bubba Boyd, and I've been writing about this event ever since August 2020. I checked.
I'm also the coauthor of a police dossier. It's the British who murder our presidents. To get your copy, follow the link in the description. Today, I'm gonna first talk about the key players in the tip exercise and their shocking, very public plan to subvert the twenty twenty election. Then I'm gonna detail how the rigging of the election, the four attempts to jail Trump and wipe out his entire movement, which started on January 6, all flow from this June twenty twenty conspirators meeting.
Finally, I'm gonna show you excerpts from a speech by Donald Trump to the World Economic Forum in January 2020. It's why this nation's enemies decided long ago that Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. It echoes Trump's condemnation of globalism and the Europeans in the new national security policy we talked about on Saturday. But before we get started, please like and share this video. You know it increases our reach on YouTube.
The publicly named sponsors of the war game were Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman from the Berggruen Institute in LA. The Berggruen Institute is the globalist home of Silicon Valley's really crazy anti Trump billionaires, like Reid Hoffman and Eric Schmidt, Google's former chairman. It has additional branches in Venice and Beijing. They claim their China branch is in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Saturday, I told you about Michael Anton, who wrote the revolutionary new Trump national security doctor.
Anton called out Tipp's war game when it happened. He said, accurately, they were planning a coup against the election, and their publicized war game were to normalize the idea in the public's mind. For that insight, Niels Gillman tweeted that Antoine deserved to be executed by a firing squad. Rosa Brooks started out as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, went to Bill Clinton's state department to conduct regime change operations, then worked for Obama as a lawyer for the undersecretary of defense for policy at the Pentagon. All the time, she was a tenured law professor at Georgetown, one of the nation's preeminent law schools.
That's why I don't wonder where our current radical judges came from. She couldn't wait to launch a coup against Trump. In January 2017, just seven days after the inauguration, she wrote a piece for Foreign Policy Magazine titled three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020. She dismissed the idea, of course, of waiting until the next election and winning it. Instead, she advocated the twenty fifth amendment and impeachment.
Both of those, of course, were tried in Trump's first term and failed. The fourth idea not mentioned incidentally in the title is a military coup. She ends this 2017 manifesto with the following. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We're not doing that.
Two, thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board. That's the lawyer for the third most powerful person in Obama's Pentagon speaking. You might ask what role is she playing now as Democrats foolishly replay the very same game. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman convened the tip war game about the twenty twenty election and its potential aftermath. It had over 100 active participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and the Republican and Democratic Party and institutions.
In short, the corrupt Washington establishment. While some names have been made public like John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Crystal, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, many others, of course, have not. All of them were anti Trump. All of them, like Brooks and Gilman, were big players in the attempt to nullify Trump's twenty sixteen election and overthrow the government. Mike Bens does a very good job detailing the various war games in the TIP exercise.
I'll just leave it at the conclusion. The insurrectionist concluded that in order to prevent Trump from having a second term, Biden needs to somehow roll up a huge victory margin in the election and overcome the obvious perception of fraud. In all their scenarios, including overturning a Trump win, they need to control the military, Black Lives Matter, and FIFA, and similar street rioters. Well, BLM got 90,000,000 in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation. And Mark Elias, the lawyer who practically led the first coup, was in charge of all their financial filings.
The military, on 08/11/2020, defense one published an article by retired colonels John Nagel and Paul Yingling blatantly calling for a military coup. Defense one followed that up on August 18 with a call to make this a matter of reasoned debate within the military rather than rejecting the idea of a coup out of hand. Mark Milley, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, was not about to obey any order from the president to quell an insurrection. He was already in open revolt against president Trump in June 2020. Now on Saturday, I got a few comments about where to find the national security strategy I was talking about.
It's on the White House website. But if you subscribe to our newsletter, we provide you with all the research which backs up what I'm saying. If you haven't already, go there and subscribe now. The link is in the description. The most overlooked part of the tips exercise is the appendix to the report.
It debates the idea to criminally proceed against Trump even after he leaves office and to totally wipe out his, quote, white supremacist and extremist base, end quote. Here's the money quote. More broadly, there needs to be a robust intentional and specific strategy to challenge the white supremacists and extremist networks that enabled Trump's rise to power and were in turn enabled by Trump's administration. This base will not automatically demobilize if and when Trump leaves office, and it is inimicable to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended. Doesn't that sound like the setup for 01/06/2021?
Recently, senator Chuck Grassley and others disclosed that Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation opened in April 2022 ahead of the twenty twenty two midterms, sought to take out huge chunks of the elect Republican Party's election organization, spied on 10 sitting senators, and targeted citizens Trump for no less than four prosecutions. Like their current European counterparts, these Democrats slandered the electoral majorities who oppose them not as citizens, but as white supremacists and extremists. If you think about the institutions they said they need to wage a coup in this document, the justice department, the Pentagon, and a mobilized radical base that they control, you get a lot of insight as to why Kash Patel, Don Bugino, and Pete Hegseth are being so relentlessly targeted even by people who say they support the president. And it's why Antifa has been allowed to run loose and grow since the 2020. The only other institution you really need here is the media.
But, hey, they were already fully treasonous when Trump came down that escalator in 2015. So what engenders this hate against Trump and Americans, quite frankly? On 01/21/2020, president Trump went right to the belly of the beast, the World Economic Forum, and presented the same spiritual agenda, which is in his new national security strategy. I just wanna play two excerpts for you, and you'll see my point.
Speaker 2: This is not a time for pessimism. This is a time for optimism. Fear and doubt is not a good thought process because this is a time for tremendous hope and joy and optimism and action. But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse. They are the heirs of yesterday's foolish fortune fortune tellers, and I have them, and you have them, and we all have them.
And they wanna see us do badly, but we don't let that happen. They predicted an overpopulation crisis in the nineteen sixties, mass starvation in the seventies, and an end of oil in the nineteen nineties. These alarmists always demand the same thing, absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives. We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country, or eradicate our liberty. Centuries ago, at the time of the Renaissance, skilled craftsmen and laborers looked upwards and built the structures that still touch the human heart.
To this day, some of the greatest structures in the world have been built hundreds of years ago. In Italy, the citizens once started construction on what would be a one hundred and forty year project, the Duomo Of Florence. Incredible, incredible place. While the technology did not yet exist to complete their design, city fathers forged ahead anyway, certain that they would figure it out someday. These citizens of Florence did not accept limits to their high aspirations.
And so the Great Dome was finally built.
Speaker 1: That tradition of optimism, building things, and exploring ever new frontiers of human knowledge is what our founders instilled in this country. It's in our bones. They understood that oligarchical imperial interests were in the process of wiping out that Renaissance tradition in Europe, a process which has almost reached its awful climax today. In conspiracy law, you have to prove that the defendants came to an agreement and then proceeded to act on it criminally. I agree with Mike Benz.
The agreement was made in the June war game, and the overt acts included the rigged election, 01/06/2021, the four Trump prosecutions, and those of his supporters who challenged the election, and the attempt to dismantle the president's constitutional controls of the military. It's now well past time to investigate all the participants for potential prosecution. I think you already know that we're not supported by anybody except our audience. People comment all the time that we need to have more influence. Well, there's only one way we can do that, and that is to build ourselves and to expand.
That's why we ask you to contribute as much as you can to help us do that. I'll see you on Thursday for our show where Susan and I will answer your questions. Until then, stay alert and get your questions in for the show. Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.
@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action
🚨 BREAKING: Peter Navarro just walked into the CFR and declared WAR on British control of America. 3 days later, Trump's "China deal" with Australia was actually aimed at dismantling Britain's imperial grip. Most missed it. Here's what really happened 👇 https://t.co/u1dAtY3mXq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Susan Kokinda presents a synthesis of two recent developments as part of a single strategic contest against the British imperial system that she argues has dominated global economics since the end of the Bretton Woods era in 1971. She asserts that Peter Navarro’s speech at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Donald Trump’s rare earths deal with Australia are coordinated moves in a broader campaign to erode Britain’s longstanding influence over American policy, institutions, and global supply chains.
Key points from Navarro’s CFR appearance:
- Navarro walked into the CFR and framed the moment as a direct challenge to British control over American policy and the institutions that enforce it.
- He accused the CFR of embodying an ideology aligned with Wall Street and multinational corporations that favor open borders, cheap offshore labor, and subsidized imports.
- Navarro highlighted America’s supply chain vulnerabilities in strategic materials and contrasted Trump’s economic nationalism with the globalist free-trade dogma.
- He recalled that the CFR’s leadership and historical ties include Michael Froman, Obama’s former trade negotiator who negotiated the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which Navarro characterized as detrimental to American manufacturing.
- Navarro argued that weakening America’s industrial base weakens strategic position and that economic security is national security, asserting that you cannot project power or deter aggression if production is surrendered or supply chains depend on adversaries’ ports.
Context and deeper claim about the British empire:
- Promethean Action frames the CFR as part of a British Roundtable lineage (the 1922 founding of the CFR’s American arm connected to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, known as Chatham House) intended to re-align the United States with imperial policy after the American Revolution.
- The piece claims that British influence and the city of London reasserted control over the world economy post-1971 under the banner of “globalism,” and that Navarro’s confrontation targets this framework.
Trump’s Australia rare earths deal:
- In a White House meeting, Trump and Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced an $8.5 billion deal to process rare earths and strategic minerals in Australia, emphasizing not only extraction but processing and joint U.S.-Australia industrial ventures.
- The deal is portrayed as a strategic strike against British imperial control because it would shift processing and value-added activities into Australia under American partnership, reducing reliance on British-influenced or Chinese-dominated processing chains.
- Australia is highlighted as the world’s largest lithium producer (about 52% of global supply) but historically exports raw materials to China for processing; the deal aims to alter this dynamic by developing domestic processing and U.S.-Australia joint ventures.
Historical parallel with Whitlam (1975):
- The narrative recounts how Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam pursued resource nationalism to gain control over resources and promote in-country processing, which provoked a British-led reaction that culminated in the governor-general dismissing Whitlam.
- The implication is that Trump’s deal mirrors Whitlam’s objectives but pairs Australia with American partnership to resist British imperial economic control rather than acting alone.
Connecting dots and implications:
- Kevin Rudd’s role as Australia’s ambassador to the U.S.—and his later position at Chatham House—connects the diplomatic network implicated in the CFR’s critique of imperial policy.
- The overarching claim is that Navarro’s CFR critique and the Australian deal are coordinated moves within a larger strategy to dismantle British imperial control and establish a world with sovereignty for national economies under American leadership.
- The piece invites viewers to join Promethean Action’s community to support what it frames as a strategic offensive against the empire and in favor of Trump-era policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last week, White House trade councilor Peter Navarro walked into the council on foreign relations and delivered a declaration of war against the British empire's control over American policy. And a few days later, Donald Trump signed a rare earth minerals deal with Australia that the mainstream media is telling you is aimed at China. But here's what they're not telling you. That deal is really aimed at dismantling Britain's centuries old imperial grip on Australia and spreading Trump's America first dominance. Now not a lot of attention was paid to Navarro's CFR speech.
You know, it's just another speech about tariffs and bringing back manufacturing. And as far as Trump's Australia deal, the talking heads will tell you that this is all about challenging China over critical materials. But that misses the deeper strategic reality. The CFR confrontation and the Australia deal are not separate moves. They're two coordinated strikes in the same war against the British imperial system.
When you connect these two developments with what's been happening since Trump's return to power, Mideast peace breakthrough, his challenge to Europe's perpetual war policies, his confrontation with the Fed, a clear strategy emerges. I'm Susan Kokinda. And since the end of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, I've tracked how the British Empire and the city of London reasserted control over the world economy, rebranding it as globalism. And what we're witnessing right now is the first real challenge to that imperial system in the entire postwar era. Most people, including a lot of Trump supporters, often miss the forest for the trees.
If you understand how important it is to get above the trees, please like and subscribe so that we can build our audience and more people will see the forest. So today, I'm gonna show you how two recent developments reveal Trump's grand strategy. First, why Peter Navarro's speech to the CFR was actually a declaration of war against British control over American policy and the institutions that have enforced it. And second, why Trump's rare earth deal with Australia is aimed primarily at Great Britain and not China. And by the end of this video, you'll understand the real war that's being fought and why the British elite are more terrified now than they have been at any point since the American Revolution.
Peter Navarro didn't just give a speech at the council on foreign relations. He marched into one of the most powerful institutions of British imperial control in The United States and punched them right in the nose.
Speaker 1: I'd to thank the council on foreign relations for this kind invitation. After all, it's not every day I get to speak before an audience that has opposed nearly every policy I've ever helped advance in the White House. But let's be honest with each other. CFR has been uniformly anti tariff and anti Trump and highly skeptical of an America first foreign policy that in truth is restoring our trade balance, rebuilding our industrial base, strengthening alliances like NATO, keeping, and as we just saw in The Middle East, negotiating the broader peace, and reasserting American sovereignty on the world stage.
Speaker 0: Navarro accused the CFR of embodying an ideology that is, quote, comfortably wedded with Wall Street and the multinational corporations that love open borders, cheap offshore labor, and an endless stream of subsidized imported goods. Now what made this speech even more enjoyable is that the CFR's current president, Michael Froman, was sitting right in front of Navarro. Froman was Barack Obama's trade negotiator and negotiated the infamous Trans Pacific Partnership, which Navarro went scorched earth on.
Speaker 1: Then came the Trans Pacific Partnership. Forgive me here, Mike. CFR sold it as a geopolitical rampart against the rising China, yet the TPP would have surrendered much of America's manufacturing base, including our crucial auto and auto parts sectors to Japan, Vietnam, and ironically, ultimately, China itself. President Trump saw this very clearly and tore up the TPP on day one. I was standing right behind him on that beautiful day.
This is what the council on foreign relations has never understood. Weakening our industrial base has never strengthened our strategic position. It has only invited aggression. That's why in Trump world, we do not trade off economic security for national security. We believe economic security is national security.
Memo to CFR, you cannot project power if you surrender production. You cannot deter aggression when your supply chains run through your opponent's ports. You can't lead the free world if you can't make what the free world needs.
Speaker 0: Now I'll give Navarro a diplomatic pass when he says that the CFR has never understood. They understand exactly what they're doing. Because the Council on Foreign Relations is a creation of the British Roundtable founded in 1922 to smother the American tradition in economics and foreign policy and to bring The United States back into the British imperial fold. Coming out of World War one, the roundtable spawned two organizations. The British arm known as the Royal Institute for International Affairs, and it's commonly known as Chatham House.
I want you to remember that name. And then in 1922, the CFR, its American arm. The CFR's mission to bring The United States back into alignment with imperial policy after we had strayed too far after that unfortunate thing called the American Revolution. And the British were largely successful. Most presidents just obeyed.
But the presidents who bucked it got assassinated, shot at, water gated, or cooed. Now one of the things that makes Promethean action so unique is that we have exposed the British hand in all of this. We wrote the ebook, it's the British who murder our presidents, and we don't just use brand names like deep state. We look at the historical and philosophical underpinnings of this fight between the British empire and the American republic and how it plays out in economics, statecraft, and culture. Now a significant part of Navarro's speech focused on America's supply chain vulnerabilities in strategic materials.
Navarro contrasted Trump's economic nationalism with the globalists' free trade dogma, as he called it, the same dogma that's made the world dangerously dependent on Chinese processing of rare earths. Now most people will stop there and think, okay. So this is about challenging China and bringing manufacturing back to America. Well, that's true, but it's not the deeper story. Because a few days after Navarro delivered that speech, Donald Trump gave gave a demonstration of exactly how he's replacing the British model with the American system.
And that's where the Australia deal comes in, but probably not for the reasons you think. When president Trump met with Australia's prime minister Anthony Albanese in the Oval Office on Monday and signed an $8,500,000,000 deal to process rare earths and strategic minerals in Australia. The establishment media is focused on that agreement as a counter to China. But I'm gonna show you what nobody else is telling you. This deal is a precision strike against British imperial control.
Let's start with what the Australian prime minister said because tucked away in his comments in the Oval Office is a key to understanding what's really happening.
Speaker 2: Australia has had a view for some time, a bit similar to putting America first. Right. Our plan is called a future made in Australia, which is about not just digging things up and exporting them, but how do we make sure that we have across the supply chains with our friends being able to benefit seize those opportunities. So we certainly see part of what this is about isn't just digging things up. It's also about processing, including that joint ventures between Australia and The United States.
Speaker 0: Did you catch that phrase? Quote, not just digging things up and exporting them, but processing them. And joint industrial ventures between The United States and Australia in Australia. In other words, Donald Trump is offering Australia a partnership based on mutual industrial development, not just imperial extraction. So why is that important?
Well, here's a good example. Australia is the world's largest lithium producer, 52% of the global supply, but it produces almost none of it. They dig it up, ship it to China, and then buy back the batteries at a huge markup. Now China's been kind of late to this game, but this is what the British have been doing for centuries, using political or economic control to extract raw materials, stifle industrial development, and keep countries perpetually dependent on foreign manufacturing. I think that's why we fought the American Revolution.
Australia has been in this paradigm though for more than a hundred and fifty years. And for most of that time, it hasn't been the Chinese doing it. In fact, the British have been pretty brutal when it comes to keeping Australia in its place as a raw materials producer. Let me tell you what happened fifty years ago, the last time an Australian prime minister tried to exert economic sovereignty over Australian resources because what happened to Gough Whitlam in 1975 is key to understanding why this Trump deal is so threatening to London. Australia's natural resources were owned by British mining companies like Rio Tinto Zinc, BHP, and other Anglo Dutch corporations, which were all intertwined with the British monarchy and the elites.
Prime minister Whitlam had a plan for, quote, resource nationalism, unquote, to give Australia control over its natural resources, to process them in Australia, and to use that wealth for the benefit of Australians. He was also looking to the Mideast to independently finance this, which didn't make the city of London very happy. So the empire struck back. In November 1975, the crown appointed governor general, sir John Cair, did the unprecedented. He dismissed the democratically elected prime minister and unilaterally installed the opposition leader as caretaker.
Tens of thousands protested in the streets, but it didn't matter because sir John had used the reserve powers of the crown to remove a prime minister who threatened British imperial control of Australia's resources. So Donald Trump just offered Australia exactly what Whitlam tried to do, industrial development and economic sovereignty. But here's the difference. Whitlam was trying to do it alone in Australia. Trump is offering American partnership and investment in Australia as part of a broader strategy to dismantle British financial control.
Britain can't use the governor general to fire the president of The United States. They've certainly tried other means, impeachments, the twenty twenty election, lawfare, assassinations. But because we're a constitutional republic and not a British satrap, they've failed. And now they can't stop Australia from accepting American partnership instead of British extraction. Now there's one more fun fact tying all of this together.
During yesterday's Oval Office press session, Trump was asked about Australia's current ambassador to The United States, Kevin Rudd, who had previously called Trump, quote, the most destructive president in American history, a village idiot, and a traitor to the West. Trump shot back publicly in the Oval Office. I don't like you either, and I probably never will. Now I hope you're not surprised when I tell you that ambassador Rudd is a senior adviser at Chatham House, the sister organization to the CFR that Navarro just eviscerated. Trump and his team are systematically confronting the institutional network of British imperial control.
So let's connect all the dots. Navarro walks into the CFR and declares their era of policy control is over. Three days later, Trump signs a deal that restructures Australia's economic relationship away from Britain, British imperial extraction, and toward American industrial partnership. These aren't separate tactical moves. They're coordinated strikes in the same strategic war.
So if you wanna have a general's view of the battlefield, you should join Promethean actions community. Become a paying member or make a contribution so you can build the political army that will execute Trump's policies. Because every move that Trump makes in the Mideast with Russia or China on tariff and industrial policy or against the Federal Reserve is aimed at dismantling the modern day British empire and establishing a world dominated by sovereign nations. The British elite understand exactly what's happening. That's why we have Antifa in the streets and Democrats shutting down the government and neocons on both sides of the Atlantic trying to keep their wars going.
Yes. The empire is fighting back. But for the first time in eighty years, they're on the defensive. So join the offense along with us and with Donald Trump. This has been your midweek update.
Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.