TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @QueenAnticommie

Saved - January 31, 2026 at 11:37 PM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

I’m so pissed about this! I spend top dollar on this butter only to find out it has soy in it which is horrible for my celiac disease 🤮 https://t.co/NsVTWAD1Xw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 discusses Kerrygold and grass-fed butter, saying Kerrygold is facing heat after admitting their grass-fed cows are fed genetically modified corn and soy for weeks at a time. Speaker 2 adds that one Kerrygold block carries months of industrial residue, and asserts that the grass-fed label is not 100% accurate. The claim continues that for months, these cows are also fed lab-engineered rations, driving inflammatory omega-6s straight into the spread. Speaker 0 notes that when people look at healthy foods like grass-fed butter, they pay more believing it’s better, less inflammatory, with fewer omega-6s. The belief is challenged by the claim that one of the largest suppliers of grass-fed butter is not feeding their cows grass but GMO corn and GMO soy. The discussion labels this as consumer fraud at the highest levels and expresses a wish that the government would take action. Speaker 2 specifies that in 2023 Kerrygold was pulled from shelves for leaching PFA chemicals from the packaging, adding another layer to the controversy. Overall, the speakers allege that Kerrygold’s grass-fed butter involves cows fed GMO corn and soy for extended periods, with cows receiving lab-engineered rations that increase omega-6 inflammatory content, and that the product was retracted in 2023 due to PFA chemicals in the packaging. They frame the situation as consumer fraud tied to premium pricing for grass-fed butter, and call for governmental intervention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna know why everyone's so sick? Watch this. Speaker 1: Grass fed butter lie. Kerrygold are facing heat after admitting their grass fed cows are fed genetically modified corn and soy for weeks at a time. Speaker 2: One Kerrygold block carries months of industrial residue, and the rabbit hole still gets darker. That grass fed label is not 100%. For months, these cows are also fed lab engineered rations, driving inflammatory omega sixes straight into your spread. But it gets worse. In 2023, it was pulled from shelves for leaching PFA chemicals from the packaging. Speaker 0: When you start looking at healthy foods, things like grass fed butter, people are paying more to get the grass fed butter because it's better for us. It's less inflammatory, less omega sixes. So to then find out that one of the largest suppliers of grass fed butter is in fact not feeding their cows grass, but corn and soy. Oh, but wait, not any corn and soy, GMO corn, GMO soy. I mean, it's just it's complete consumer fraud. It's fraud at the absolute highest levels and I really, really hope and wish our government would do something about this.
Saved - November 4, 2025 at 2:23 PM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

It's bad enough people have to pay property tax, but now they want to ell you what you can and can't do on your own property. Is this true.@grok? https://t.co/dbhYtO4iil

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The conversation centers on a neighbor dispute and enforcement of village ordinances. The speaker implies trouble arises when the neighbor complains about work being done that goes against the village rules, such as detailing or washing the car. - They question whether the activity is on private property, with references to work on the lawn and “on your own property,” but the other party counters that it is “still in public view.” - The speaker asserts that they are not making things up and mentions a plan to call a lieutenant to come over, citing water violations and other issues: “Water violations. Washington motor vehicles, rods, furniture, living in public place. This is a private area. This is a private private residential Yeah. This is a home.” - The other person pushes back, saying “That’s what you say. It’s still in public view,” and challenges whether the deed proves private property: “You wanna get the deed to the house that says it’s private? It’s a private area.” - The first speaker warns that if actions continue, they will be back “to give you tickets,” and adds: “The cancel is really quick.” - There is an advisory stance: “So I’m advising you. You guys wanna do something? If you wanna give us the ticket, you should give it to us now because we do do it. We Start doing some work, and then you’ll have your ticket.” - A disagreement over whether the location is a public place persists, with the claim: “But it said public place. This is not a public place.” - Details shift to a vehicle discussion: the car in question, with a name “Eric G,” described as the car “we got the guy we got from.” The conversation notes: “In Connecticut, by the way.” - They reference another car “here that was parked with those plates and this or mismatched on the car,” suggesting some verification or pattern they’ve observed: “We have that other car here that was parked with those plates and this or mismatched on the car. Yeah. We get away with it for a while.” - The car’s ownership details are discussed: “Was the car bought between me and my friend. He bought this car yesterday. What state? Connecticut.” - The name under the title is identified as “Eric Gere.” The dialogue confirms: “The names are the name under the title is Eric Gere.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there a problem? Yeah. What is that? Problem being, your neighbor doesn't like you. That's not my fault. Let's do that. Yeah. Well, it is when you start calling about things being done here that goes against the village ordinance. Such as? Such as doing any kind of work here or any kind of detailing, like washing the car and things like that. You know how to do it. On your own property? The lawn. Wanna sit? Yeah. Come on. I don't make this shit up. I ain't just driving down the street to come over here and drink the pools. Okay? I'm gonna call from your lieutenant to come over here. Water violations. Washington motor vehicles, rods, furniture, living in public place. This is a private area. This is a private private residential Yeah. This is a home. Okay. That's what you say. It's still in public view. You wanna get the deed to the house that says it's private? It's a private area. You do what you gotta do. Okay. If you do it, we will be back here to give you tickets. Alright? The cancel is really quick. So I'm advising you. You guys wanna do something? If if you wanna give us the ticket, you should give it to us now because we do do it. We Start doing some work, and then you'll have your ticket. Okay. But it said public place. This is not a public place. Oh, by the way, the the what was the name again under the car? Oh, Eric G. That's the car we got the guy we got from. In Connecticut, by the way. We have that other car here that was parked with those plates and this or mismatched on the car. Yeah. We get away with it for a while. Your car? Was the car bought between me and my friend. He bought this car yesterday. What state? Connecticut. Connecticut. The names are the name under the title is Eric Gere.
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 4:29 AM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

https://t.co/IXOqYQEKsS

Saved - October 7, 2024 at 9:44 PM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

FEMA helicopter intentionally flew low over a volunteer supply drop zone because the volunteers REFUSED to let FEMA confiscate their supplies Imagine being the bootlicking pos order follower who goes along with this. Traitorous filth

Saved - May 9, 2024 at 12:48 PM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

#BorderPatrol Checkpoint Freakout Why is border control bothering citizens? https://t.co/I9rxW27nbo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 refuses to answer questions at a federal immigration checkpoint, citing their 5th and 6th amendment rights. They argue with border patrol agents, leading to a tense confrontation where they are threatened with arrest. The situation escalates as Speaker 1 refuses to comply with the agents' requests, resulting in a physical altercation. The confrontation continues as Speaker 1 asserts their rights and demands not to be touched by the agents, leading to a standoff. The situation remains unresolved as Speaker 1 continues to resist the agents' attempts to detain them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. How are you guys? Speaker 1: Doing well. Speaker 0: I'm just going on the website. Speaker 1: I do mind. Speaker 0: You working down here? Speaker 1: Yes, ma'am. Okay. Speaker 0: Going for work for the day? Alrighty. Both of you are citizens? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You're citizens, sir? Speaker 1: I don't answer questions. Speaker 0: You actually do have to answer if you're US citizen. Speaker 1: I actually don't have to answer any goddamn questions because I have a 5th amendment right not to answer any fucking questions. Speaker 0: Federal immigration checkpoint. Yes. You do have to answer. Right. Speaker 1: You're US citizen. And we're a 100 miles away from the fucking border. No. You're not. I have not. You're not. Well, I am within the United States. I have a 5th amendment right not to answer any fucking questions without a fucking lawyer present. I'm invoking my 6th amendment right. Do whatever the fuck you gotta do. This is a federal I have no statements to make, and I'm not answering any fucking questions. You do have Speaker 0: to answer review I Speaker 1: don't have to answer a goddamn thing. 5th amendment. Speaker 0: Yes. You do. Speaker 1: I don't have to answer any fucking thing. Speaker 0: Right there. You You do have to answer if you yes to the I Speaker 1: don't have to answer a goddamn thing. Alright. Speaker 0: Then you can park right up there. Speaker 1: You just We don't have to park right up there. We'd like to be free to go on or about our way. Speaker 0: Federal immigration inspection Speaker 1: need I understand that. And I have a federal 5th amendment right to fucking remain silent, bitch. I don't answer questions. Leave me the fuck alone. What the fuck do you want? Speaker 0: Yes. It is. And yes or no? Speaker 1: I don't answer questions. Kick fucking rocks. Get a fucking warrant. This is being videoed. Speaker 0: That's fine. You can read the sign right there. Speaker 1: I don't need to fucking read the sign. I've read the law. Speaker 0: The law Speaker 1: I've read the constitution. Speaker 0: Yes. The Speaker 1: United States in Texas. We're also in Texas, and I don't have to fucking ID unless I'm under arrest. So kick fucking rocks, bitch. Speaker 0: You're within a 100 miles Speaker 1: of Fuck you. Speaker 0: Alright. Then park right up there. Speaker 1: Not gonna park up there. Speaker 0: Then we can call the Call Speaker 1: whoever the fuck you want. Speaker 0: Impeding traffic right now. Speaker 1: No. You're impeding traffic. We'd like to be free about it to go on our way. I'm not. You're the one who is stopping us here. You're stopping us here. Speaker 0: Disrespect this. This is a US border Speaker 1: You don't need to disrespect me. Speaker 0: And I am attempting to conduct an immigration inspection under section 28783 of the Immigration Nationality Act. Speaker 1: And I'm invoking my 5th amendment right to remain silent. Fuck off. Speaker 0: In the United States versus Martinez Fuerte, 1976, that the US border patrol has the authority to set up permanent or fixed checkpoints. Speaker 1: Yes. On public highways. Yes. You you are allowed to set up your checkpoints. Speaker 2: From the men Speaker 1: I am not required. Speaker 0: That these checkpoints are not a violation of the 4th amendment. Do you understand that? Speaker 1: I didn't say it was a violation of the 4th amendment. In order I'm invoking my 5th amendment right. Speaker 0: Necessary inspection to allow us to complete the immigration inspection. Speaker 1: Complete your inspection. Speaker 0: If you do not move your vehicle, you can be arrested under title 18 Speaker 1: Does that mean we're free to go? Speaker 0: 91. Does Speaker 1: that mean we're free to go? Speaker 0: For this federal crime can be up Speaker 1: to 1 year I need I need the names. I need the names and badge numbers of every agent present right here, right now. And I'll be pointing that that camera's footage. Speaker 0: So you're not willing to move? Speaker 1: Oh, we're absolutely willing to move. Are you gonna let us be free to go about our what? Speaker 0: No. Not yet. Speaker 1: Okay. Then we're gonna sit here. 5th Amendment. Speaker 0: Are you a US citizen? Speaker 1: 5th Amendment. Speaker 0: Are you a US citizen? Who are you asking? Both of you. I am. Yes. You're a US citizen. Are you a US citizen? Speaker 1: I don't answer questions. Speaker 0: Anybody else in the back? No. No. As a driver, are you willing to move your vehicle? Speaker 1: As long as I'm free to continue in my travel. You're not free Speaker 0: to go Yeah. Until he answers the question, the immigration question. Speaker 1: 5th amendment. Speaker 0: Okay. So neither Speaker 1: one I have not crossed the US border. I don't have to answer that question. I have a 5th amendment right, and I'm specifically invoking my 6th amendment right to be free from questioning without a lawyer. 6th amendment has been invoked. Do not ask any more questions. 6th Amendment. Vice Kennedy Goloset. You don't have to. Speaker 0: Police forecasting them out. Then we're gonna have to take y'all out. We have to do the immigration inspection. We have we have to do it. Thank you. Speaker 1: You're welcome to fucking inspect. Speaker 0: Alright. And then part of the United States citizen. Is the immigration aspect. Speaker 1: 6th amendment. We just need to know a jurisdiction. Speaker 0: That's all Speaker 1: it is. Amendment. Do you have reason to believe that I am not a United States citizen? Question, sir. If you're a United States citizen, you're free to go. Do you have reason to believe that I am not a United States citizen? That works. Speaker 0: So you might set me out. Speaker 1: Do what you gotta do. I don't care. It's a company vehicle. I know. Do whatever you gotta do. Speaker 0: Don't don't. Speaker 1: Don't reach in the vehicle. That's a 4th amendment violation. Speaker 0: Can you shut the vehicle up, sir? Speaker 1: Don't fucking put your hands on him. Don't fucking put your hands on him. You fucking pieces of shit. Put your hands on him. Chance to do it. Put him down. Don't fucking put your hands on him. Okay. Fucking guns, John. Fucking do it. You fucking pieces of shit. Speaker 2: Yeah. You're not moved, sir. You guys border patrol. Please move yourself in the vehicle, sir. Otherwise, you will be forced to be removed. Thank you, sir. Speaker 1: Don't fucking touch me. Speaker 2: Please be fair. Speaker 1: I do not consent to any searches or seizures. Stand for, sir. Speaker 2: Put your hands on the vehicle. I will not. Speaker 1: Okay, sir. Speaker 2: You need to just reply at this moment, otherwise, you'll be forced to Speaker 1: be fired. What crime am I being detained for? Speaker 2: Martinez Fuerte, case law 2428, sir, states that any vehicle at a 100 nautical miles would be expected for Speaker 1: Keep your goddamn hands off of my brother. What the fuck is wrong with you? Speaker 2: Sir. Okay? Speaker 1: I do not need to keep my hands out of my pockets. Speaker 2: Requesting again? Speaker 1: There is no law that says that I am required to keep my hands out of my fucking pockets. Speaker 0: Calm down. Let's calm down. Alright? We don't we don't want any problems. Speaker 1: I don't want any fucking pro keep your goddamn hands off me. Don't touch me. Alright. Hey. Don't touch me. That's assault. It's not assault. It is assault. Any unwanted touching is assault. I do not wanna be touched by you or any of your fucking officers. Why are you pointing a fucking taser at me? Do I appear to be fucking Speaker 0: armed? Aggressive. Damn. Speaker 1: My hands in my pockets so that I'm not a threat. Please take your hand out of your hand. I don't know Speaker 0: what's in your pocket. That's what the problem. Speaker 1: Keep your fucking hands off me. Why are you touching me? We're gonna take Why the fuck are you touching me? Why are you fucking touching me? Why are you fucking touching me?
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 6:42 AM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

Ohio police fired at 15-year-old holding toy gun, open carry state. Thoughts? https://t.co/u1mYP9kij4

Video Transcript AI Summary
An Akron police officer shot a 15-year-old carrying a fake gun, sparking demands for his firing by the Freedom Block activist group. Officer Ryan Westlake had prior disciplinary issues. The incident began with a call about a person pointing a gun at houses. Body cam footage shows the encounter. The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation is looking into the case. Akron's new police auditor will review the findings and share them with the citizens police oversight board and the mayor. Remaining objective and impartial is crucial until all investigations are complete.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I need to go assist you. What are you talking about? Can you see your hands real quick? Oh, hey. Hey, agent. Hey, it's fake. It's fake. It's fake. It's fake. It's fake. It's fake. Shot fired. Drop to the ground. Drop to the ground. Drop to the ground. It's fake. Drop to the ground. Fake. Drop to the ground. Speaker 1: Akron activist group, the Freedom Block, demanding that Akron police officer Ryan Westlake be fired after he shot a 15 year old who was carrying a fake gun on April 1st. The group citing that Westlake had prior disciplinary actions, including being fired then reinstated. Akron PD says it started with a woman calling in to say someone was walking around the Goodyear Heights neighborhood pointing a gun at houses. In newly released body cam video, officer Westlake is shown approaching the team. The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation is now investigating. After that, Akron's new independent police auditor, Anthony Fennell, will take the case. Fennell says he'll then share his findings with the city's citizens police oversight board who could make a recommendation to the mayor. For this process to work, we real I really need to remain objective, remain impartial, and then wait until all of the investigations have been done, and then look at all of the evidence and, make a determination.
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 4:17 PM

@QueenAnticommie - Anticommie

I wonder if antifa and the lefties that voted for him have seen this one lol #biden https://t.co/SsR2fatG0C

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel is America's greatest strength in the Middle East. Imagine a world without Israel, how many battleships and troops would be needed? I used to say as a young senator that I would be a Zionist, and I still am. Being a Zionist doesn't require being Jewish.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is the single greatest strength America has in the Middle East. I always say to my friends when they say those things to you, I say, imagine our circumstance in the world were there no Israel. How many battleships would there be? How many troops would be stationed? You know, I used to say early on when I was a kid, I'd say when I was a young senator, I'd say, if I were you, I'd be a Zionist. I am a Zionist. You don't have to be a Jew to be a
View Full Interactive Feed