reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @RBystrianyk

RBystrianyk
Posted - December 11, 2024 at 8:08 PM
Saved - December 12, 2024 at 4:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Working with Dr. Suzanne Humphries has been incredibly inspiring. She left a successful nephrology career to stand against troubling hospital practices. Her dedication to uncovering the truth about vaccines showcases the strength of conviction and the bravery needed to advocate for what’s right.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Working alongside Dr. Suzanne Humphries has been nothing short of inspiring. She courageously walked away from a lucrative career as a nephrologist, unwilling to remain complicit in the troubling practices she witnessed in her hospital. Driven by integrity and a commitment to uncovering and sharing the truth, she has dedicated her life to studying, writing, and speaking about vaccines. Her journey is a testament to the power of conviction and the courage it takes to stand for what’s right.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

Physician and Co-Author of Dissolving Illusions Dr. Suzanne Humphries Describes What DTaP, Polio, and Hib “Vax” Do to Babies‼️ The jabs cause the activation of 33 allergy related genes and 66 asthma genes plus the upregulation of 67 cancer genes and 25 immunological genes‼️🙏👇 Full video 👇👇 https://rumble.com/v55zchi-dr.-suzanne-humphries-lecture-on-vaccines-and-health-part-1-2014.html Credit 👉 RealWorldNewsChannel 💫

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 2008 Swedish study examined infants after receiving their routine vaccinations, including diphtheria, pertussis, polio, and Hib. Blood samples were taken from these babies and exposed to
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is another study that I will show you, from 2,008. This was a Swedish study and they looked at infants after their diphtheria testis acellular pertussis vaccines, and polio Hib. So these were babies and they got their regular vaccines at 3 5 months. And then they took some of their blood out and they exposed it to, the whooping cough toxin which is basically what's in the vaccine. Okay? And then they looked to see what happened 12 hours later in a genetic level. And what this doctor reported was 33 allergy related genes were activated. 66 asthma genes were activated. 67 cancer genes were up regulated and 25 immunological genes were up regulated. Okay? So we're definitely seeing on a genetic level, some waking up. Now whether or not it goes through completely and causes these diseases. No, it doesn't in everybody right then and there. But do we know that unless something comes along and shuts these down, what is the result? We don't know.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health PART 1 (2014) Dr. Suzanne Humphries speaks on her background and about how she started to question the safety on vaccines. She also gives information about how authorities work to persuade people to vaccinate. The rumble.com
RBystrianyk
Posted - October 24, 2024 at 1:50 PM
Saved - October 24, 2024 at 4:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to share Rosa Howell's poignant account from The Columbus Medical Journal in 1908, where she recounts her brother's troubling experience with vaccination. After vaccinating his four children, two suffered severe reactions, including sores and hair loss, while another nearly lost an arm to blood poisoning. Howell also tells of a friend's tragic loss of her healthy son following vaccination, leading them to oppose the practice too late. This narrative raises critical questions about the historical implications of vaccination and its potential consequences.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Why does history matter? Do you think vaccine disasters are something new? Read what Rosa Howell had to say in The Columbus Medical Journal in 1908. “In the hope of saving some child from the curse of vaccination, I want every reader of The Columbus Medical Journal to know of my brother’s experience with same. He had his four children vaccinated. The physician pronounced it a success. They thought so, too. Two of the children’s bodies were almost covered with sores, their hair came out, leaving the scalp bare, the third came near losing his arm from blood poison, the fourth was more fortunate, but it was years before they got over it. Fact is I don’t think they will ever be the same in health they were before they had their blood polluted with vaccine virus. I have a friend that lost her only boy from the same hideous thing. He was a bright, healthy child at birth and remained so till a year old, when his father, through fear of smallpox, had him vaccinated. Then followed a year of misery for the little one, for, the mother told me, it was never well a day afterwards. The father is a physician, but he was powerless to save his child. Now, they are against the blood polluting practice of vaccinating, but too late to save their darling.” — Rosa C. Howell [Rosa C. Howell, “Vaccination Worse Than Smallpox,” The Columbus Medical Journal, vol. XXXII, no. 9, September 1908, pp. 484–485.]

RBystrianyk
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 4:33 PM
Saved - October 17, 2024 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on the historical context of government and industry pressures to mandate medical procedures against individual will. This isn't a new issue; it echoes the experience of Miss Allsop over a century ago. It raises the question: are we truly a free society or are we living under dictatorial control?

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Being threatened by governments and industries to put something into your body against your will is nothing new. They feel you should have no rights and that they can force you to do something like this against your free will. See what happened to Miss Allsop over 100 years ago. Are we a free or dictatorial society? [“Vaccination,” The Theocrat, vol. VI, no. 45, December 20, 1919.]

RBystrianyk
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 1:09 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm excited to share my six-part documentary, "Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion," which explores various aspects of vaccination and health. Each episode builds on the previous one, culminating in a comprehensive list of references. The series includes discussions on mortality data, the history of smallpox vaccination, the concept of disease transmission, the health revolution, the dangers of medicine, and a new perspective on health. I hope you find the series intriguing and thought-provoking as we delve into these critical topics.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion - Part 3: Catching a Disease Over the coming days, I’ll share my six-part documentary, Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion. Each episode builds on the last, and by the end of part six, you’ll find a complete list of references used throughout the series. I hope you find it both intriguing and thought-provoking. The six parts are: 1. Mortality Data — Looking at Official Data; Cherry Picking 2. What About Smallpox? — Inoculating Smallpox; Swapping Human Inoculation with a Mystery Brew: Vaccination; Compulsory Vaccination and the Blowback; Smallpox Fades; Deadly Consequences 3. Catching a Disease — Experienced Doctors Notice Failure of Sick-to-Well Transmission; Experiments to Prove Sick-to-Well Transmission; From Infectious Disease to Nutritional Deficiency; Closing Act 4. From Rags to Riches – The World’s Greatest Health Revolution — Rags; Riches 5. Deadly Medicine 6. A New Path and References

RBystrianyk
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 12:58 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 12:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm excited to share my six-part documentary, "Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion," which explores various aspects of vaccination. Each episode builds on the previous one, culminating in a comprehensive list of references. The series includes discussions on mortality data, the history of smallpox vaccination, the concept of disease transmission, the evolution of health, and critiques of modern medicine. I hope you find the content both intriguing and thought-provoking as we delve into these important topics.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion - Part 2: What About Smallpox? Over the coming days, I’ll share my six-part documentary, Dissolving the Vaccine Illusion. Each episode builds on the last, and by the end of part six, you’ll find a complete list of references used throughout the series. I hope you find it both intriguing and thought-provoking. The six parts are: 1. Mortality Data — Looking at Official Data; Cherry Picking 2. What About Smallpox? — Inoculating Smallpox; Swapping Human Inoculation with a Mystery Brew: Vaccination; Compulsory Vaccination and the Blowback; Smallpox Fades; Deadly Consequences 3. Catching a Disease — Experienced Doctors Notice Failure of Sick-to-Well Transmission; Experiments to Prove Sick-to-Well Transmission; From Infectious Disease to Nutritional Deficiency; Closing Act 4. From Rags to Riches – The World’s Greatest Health Revolution — Rags; Riches 5. Deadly Medicine 6. A New Path and References

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lady Mary Wortley Montagu introduced smallpox inoculation to the Western world in 1717, taking material from lesions and scratching it onto skin. While some doctors embraced it, others, like Isaac Massey, argued smallpox wasn't deadly if left alone, and inoculation could cause death. Thomas Sydenham, the "English Hippocrates," echoed this in 1688. Despite assurances, inoculation led to deaths, sometimes blaming the patient. Smallpox deaths in London increased after inoculation's introduction. John Birch argued smallpox was made malignant by medical interventions. In 1796, nearly 1 in 5 London deaths were from smallpox, setting the stage for Edward Jenner's cowpox vaccination. Jenner used pus from a dairymaid's sore, claiming it provided lifelong smallpox immunity. His vaccine included horsepox and goat pox. Critics like Dr. TB Gifford noted vaccine variability. Vaccine material was often regenerated by passing it through animals or humans. Hygiene was poor, mixing vaccines with microbes and chemicals. Vaccination became widespread and profitable, leading to compulsory laws despite failures. Smallpox deaths spiked in 1871-73 despite high vaccination rates. Protests arose, like in Leicester, England, where low vaccination rates correlated with declining smallpox deaths. Doctors like C Killick Millard confirmed this. Doctors like A.H. Caron opposed vaccination. Deaths and injuries were often ignored or misattributed. Some doctors, like William Hitchman, witnessed children killed by vaccination. Despite evidence, the medical system's "obsession" continued, sacrificing lives on the "altar of vaccination," as C Henry Kemp put it in 1968.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We can recognize the mistakes of our predecessors and those of some of our contemporaries. We wonder that the old time doctor did not suspect that his lancet, used for bloodletting, his calomel, mercury, and tartar emetic, a violent and toxic purgative, especially by causing evacuation of the bowels, Put many a patient underground, whose disease would have ended in recovery, if it had been let alone. We are ready to admit frankly that in the past many patients have unquestionably died of the doctor. In fact, this very disease variola, smallpox, is a case in point. For the change in the death rate as compared with earlier records, leaves no possible doubt that mistaken treatment had more than anything else to do with the great mortality of the scourge, smallpox. Henry g Hanschett, MD, January 18, 89. Speaker 1: So what is a vaccine? Where did this name come from? Where did the idea of making you sick to keep you a healthy start? The first endeavor to prevent smallpox in the Western world began with Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 17/17. She returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of a practice that entailed taking a small amount of material from a human smallpox lesion, and scratching it onto another person's skin. This method was supposedly a way to protect someone from smallpox. Speaker 2: The smallpox, so fatal and so general amongst us, is here entirely harmless by the invention of engrafting, which is the term they give it. Every year, thousands undergo this operation, and the French ambassador says, pleasantly, that they take the smallpox here by way of diversion, as they take the waters in other countries. There is no example of anyone that has died of it, and you may believe that I am well satisfied of the safety of this experiment. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, letter to miss Sarah Criswell, 17/17. Speaker 1: This newfangled notion was quickly embraced by most of the medical profession. However, some pointed out that smallpox was not the deadly disease that people imagined, and that the risk of this new inoculation of smallpox was high and could result in death. Speaker 3: Inoculation is an art of giving smallpox to persons in health who might otherwise have lived many years and perhaps to a very old age without it, whereby some unhappily come to an untimely death. I hope there are but few such doctors. Miserable is the patient that employs them. I never saw such practice with design in my life, and yet have been an observer near 40 years in the practice of physics. What pitiful shifts are men driven to, when they have some unreasonable cause to maintain? In short, tears are practice against nature, and therefore cannot be a good one. I would advise them to change the word inoculation, and take incantation in its stead. I have one observation more to add, taken from the success of the small pox in Christ's hospital, where there is generally near 600 children, the nurseries at Ware and Hartford, constantly filling the places of those who go off. Here it hath sometimes happened, that great numbers have been down of the small pox, and 'tis but seldom, that the house is free, yet in 20 years there have not died above 5 or 6 at most of that distemper, small pox. And in the last 8 years there died but 1, and seldom above 5 or 6 in a year of all distempers, any disease that caused fever, so little need is there of inoculation. Isaac Massey, apothecary to Christ's Hospital, 17/22. Speaker 1: Even as far back as 16/88, Thomas Sydenham MD, known as the English Hippocrates, and the father of English medicine. Noted as long as the medical profession did not interfere, smallpox was not as severe and deadly a problem as it is usually Speaker 4: portrayed. Considering the practices that obtained, both amongst learned and ignorant physicians, it had been happy for mankind, that either the art of physic had never been exercised, or the notion of malignity never stumbled upon. As it is palpable to all the world, how fatal that disease proves to many of all ages, So it is most clear to me, from all the observations that I can possibly make, that if no mischief be done, either by physician or nurse, it smallpox is the most slight and safe of all other diseases. Thomas Sydenham, MD, known as the English Hippocrates and the father of English medicine, 16/88. Speaker 1: The inoculation procedure introduced in 17/21 did not gain public acceptance until around 17/48. In 17/54, the Royal College of Physicians of London strongly endorsed inoculation. From 1748 to 1798, over the course of 50 years, public acceptance of physician promoted smallpox inoculation continued to grow. Yet despite assurances from medical men of the ease and safety of this new medical procedure of inoculation, it could result in horrifying and painful deaths. And when the inoculation or other medical intervention caused the death of a patient, the patient was often blamed. Take this example of a 9 year old girl from 17/24, just a few years after the introduction of this novel operation. She was inoculated and later became extremely ill despite the inoculary saying she would play the whole time. The poor girl was then bled by a doctor, a standard medical notion of the time, and then finally, after weeks of suffering, she died, and was blamed for her own death by people who should have taken responsibility for their actions. Speaker 2: When I determined by my friend's persuasion to have my daughter inoculated, I sent for mister Amiand. He declared himself very well satisfied with her state of health. And though I proposed having a physician to attend her, asked him whether there was not to be some preparation. He said there was no occasion for anything I had offered, but the child would be so well all the course of the disease that she would play about the room the whole time. About 5 or 6 days after the inoculation, she was seized with great pains in all her joints. The smallpox came out about the 10th or 11th day very violently. Soon after another doctor was called, who he said understood inoculation, soon after their bleeding her, there appeared a swelling upon one of her elbows. In 9 weeks after the inoculation, and after the most miserable suffering, that ever poor creature underwent, she died worn to nothing but skin and bone. She had 6 and 30 running sores, none of them having ever been healed, when she died, and they were forced to roll up her joints in passport, least the joints should fall out of their places. I am very sensible of the reports which have been spread about her and mister Amiant himself, as I said before, allowed her to be in a very good condition and fit for the operation even without the help, either of a physician or any preparation. It is very extraordinary to have such reports spread, and particularly that any man should talk in print of the irregular life of a child of 9 years old. The world may see by it the humanity of having such a misfortune aggravated, by the very people who at least should show some repentance for the misery they brought upon an afflicted mother. Missus Anne Rolle, September 16, 17 24. Speaker 1: This chart based on the London bills of mortality shows that over a 150 years, deaths from smallpox as a percentage of total deaths increased by more than 50% after the introduction of smallpox inoculation. The average rate of smallpox deaths during the 3 periods shown, rose from 6.2%, to 7.8%, to 9.6%. Of particular note, a smallpox epidemic in 17/96, just before the turn of the century was responsible for over 18% of deaths. This was the highest percentage of deaths from smallpox in Northern during the 1700 despite the highly promoted and profitable medical treatment of smallpox inoculation. So with inoculation being promoted and performed, smallpox have become a much worse problem by the end of the 1700. Again, some recognize that smallpox is a mild disease, if handled properly without deadly medical treatment. Speaker 5: I consider even the natural smallpox a mild disease and only rendered malignant by mistakes in nursing, in diet, and in medicine, and by want of cleanliness. It would hardly be too bold to say that the fatal treatment of this disease for 2 centuries by warming and confining the air of the chamber and by stimulating and heating cordials was the cause of 2 thirds of the mortality which ensued. John Birch, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, London, 18/14. Speaker 1: In 17/96, nearly 1 in 5 deaths in London were caused by smallpox. As a result of worsening smallpox deaths, many, particularly among the educated and wealthy class, were eager to embrace something new that could replace inoculation, and eradicate the seemingly never ending plague. The stage was set for Edward Jenner and his notion of cowpoxing, later renamed vaccination. Speaker 6: It is a convenient habit of vaccinators to speak of vaccinations as uniform, as if the virus of the right were as definite as a drop of water, a pinch of salt, or a grain of gold. Nothing could be further from the truth. The virus called vaccine is not one but various, not uniform but multiform, not certain but uncertain with an uncertainty which in transit from body to body, ad infinitum, can be predicted nor ascertained. The matter of his Lancet he cannot define and its effects he cannot foresee. To these stocks have been added smallpox cowpox obtained by inoculating cows with the virus or pus of human smallpox. Thus, we have virus derived from horse grease cowpox, from natural or spontaneous cowpox, from horsepox, and from smallpox cowpox, plus the constitutional taints of the generations of vaccinifers through which these diverse poxes have been passed. And which is which, and how modified for better or for worse in the course of travel none can tell. Doctor TB Gifford, 18/88. Speaker 1: It was noticed that the dirty hands of farm laborers who touch the teats or other sensitive parts of the cow produced the disorder called cowpox. Some people believe that milkmaids or others who came down with cowpox were not, as a rule, subject to smallpox during epidemics. Consequently, it became a matter of countryside gossip that cowpox was a preventative against getting smallpox. Edward Jenner heard and believed these rumors despite many reported cases of smallpox after cowpox. He made a slight variation on the already widespread medical use of inoculation. Instead of taking diseased material from a smallpox victim, he took diseased material from someone who appeared to be suffering from an animal acquired disease. After some experiments, Edward Jenner quickly claimed his notion was perfectly safe and provided lifelong protection from smallpox infection. On March 17, 1802, Jenner petitioned the House of Commons and made the following declaration. Speaker 3: That your petitioner having discovered that a disease which occasionally exists in a particular form among cattle, known by the name of cowpox, admits of being inoculated, vaccinated on the human frame with the most perfect ease and safety, and is attended with the singularly beneficial effect of rendering through life the person sir inoculated perfectly secure from the infection of smallpox. Edward Jenner, March 17, 1802. Speaker 1: But really, what was a vaccine made of? Edward Jenner did his famous experiment using pus obtained from a cow. Actually, he took material from a pus filled sore on the hand of a dairy maid that Jenner claimed had been infected from milking cows. Then he inserted the pus into 2 incisions on the arm of an 8 year old boy. The child was later deliberately exposed to smallpox to test the protective property of the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, Jenner claimed that the cowpox vaccination was successful and would provide lifelong protection against smallpox. Jenner named his product after a Latin name for cow, Vaca, and the idea of vaccination was born. Vaccine material could be saved by placing numerous pox scabs into a container, filling with water and shaking it. That diluted pox scab mixture would be used to vaccinate others. From the beginning, Edward Jenner thought that genuine cowpox disease originated from the running sores of sick horse's heels, a condition called the grease. Also known as horsepox. So Jenner used horsepox to vaccinate and supplied it to others as a source of vaccine. Jenner also thought that smallpox, swinepox, cowpox, and horsepox were merely provided as the same disease. Jenner also approved the use of goat pox which was used to vaccinate children. In 17/89, Jenner had inoculated his 18 month old son with swine pox. Between that year and 17/92, he repeatedly inoculated his son with smallpox. Possibly Speaker 6: due Speaker 1: to these experiments, his son was always delicate in health and died of pulmonary consumption, now known as tuberculosis at the young age of 21. Over the years decades, whatever vaccine material was used seemed to lose its potency. So many believed to regenerate and increase the virulence of the virus stock was to pass it through humans or animals other than a cow, such as a horse, donkey, mule, goat, sheep, or rabbit. Even buffalo was used to create vaccine material. Also, over many decades, cows were directly inoculated with smallpox from someone that had died of smallpox to make smallpox cow vaccine material. In addition, the blankets from people who died from smallpox were hung around cows heads to make vaccine material. The ulcerated utter of a cow subject to this procedure was then scraped to get the vaccine material. The notion of regenerating supposedly fading vaccine material became known as retro vaccination. The puss would be taken from humans and then to animals and then back to humans again. Children and young animals were preferred because they were seen as healthier in producing better vaccine material. Once a person was vaccinated with some type of concoction made from the puss of a sore on a cow, horse, goat, pig, sheep, you'll ask buffalo rabbit or smallpox from a corpse scratched onto a cow or other animal. That person was used to vaccinate the next person, and then the next and the next, and the procedure called arm to arm vaccination. Vaccine material would eventually be scratched from animal to animal to reinvigorate the vaccine stock, which was then used to vaccinate more people. On top of that, we know hygiene was virtually non existent during the 1800. So every vaccination on every human and every animal is mixed with whatever other microbes and assorted chemicals were on the skin, and in the pus of that creature. Even by the relatively more hygienic first half of the 1900, as many as half a 1000000000 organisms including bacteria, yeast, and fungi per milliliter might be present in each vaccine. By the late 1800, large vaccine farms were established to produce vaccines. The extracted pus used for vaccination would unavoidably be mixed with blood during the collection process. Collected vaccine points collected from numerous animals would be left out in the open areas to be dried before being sent out for distribution to vaccinate millions. Even by the 18 eighties, vaccine farms were often crowded and unhygienic, leaving little doubt that what was termed so called pure lymph that was often claimed by public officials was anything but that. So in reality, a vaccine was never really a vaccine in the sense of the word where Vaca means cow. Instead, vaccination was essentially a brand name used to describe puss and blood from an entire menagerie of animals, cows, horses, goats, pigs, sheep, mules, asses, buffalos, rabbits, and humans, including corpses of those had died from smallpox, microbes and chemicals scratched onto people with the notion of keeping them safe from smallpox. Each scratch a person received would be a haphazard gamble as to what was in that mystery brew. The famous often believed stories that of a country doctor, Edward Jenner making an incredible discovery of cowpox would save the world from smallpox. But when we look behind the curtain of this fable, we see that vaccines being used were a mix of pus and blood from a strange and varied number of human and animal sources. So knowing what this concoction called the vaccine was really made of, does it make sense to you that it could have possibly been responsible for eradicating any disease? Speaker 3: The accumulating resistance on the part of parents of both sexes, to a law cruelly and tyrannically imposed under the existing acts by boards of guardians at the dictation of interested officials, paid agents, to violate the sanctity of conscience, and the homes of a loyal and law abiding people, while magistrates who have properly been called a terror to evil doers, have a new statutory function to fulfill in committing parents, who have done no wrong to prison, they're to associate with thieves and criminals of every type. I feel convinced, my lords and gentlemen, that when the facts concerning vaccination are known in all their bearings in relation to the life and well-being of the nation, you will arrive at the conclusion. That to retain in the statute book an act compelling submission to a dangerous operation, under fine and imprisonment is discreditable as well to hereditary as to representative parliaments, and that you will in due time. After fair inquiry, repeal those acts. Charles T Pierce, MD, 1882. Speaker 1: Over the 1800, vaccination, which was also highly profitable, became a widespread belief in the medical profession. Despite failures, vaccine injuries and deaths, and doctors who oppose vaccination, compulsory vaccination laws were implemented worldwide. The extensive medical acceptance of vaccination was much like what happened over 80 years for inoculation. However, unlike inoculation, vaccination laws were enacted to force people to accept this medical operation. In England, the government did not begin to enforce vaccination till the first acts in 18/40/18/53. The 18/53 laws set the governmental machinery in place to require every child to be vaccinated within 3 months of birth. The 1867 vaccination act consolidated existing laws regarding vaccination, and instituted a fine for parents who did not present their children for vaccination within 3 months of birth. Yet, despite strict laws, smallpox deaths continued over the decades and culminated in a massive worldwide spike in smallpox fatalities in 18/71 to 18/73, despite high vaccination rates. Speaker 7: The deaths from smallpox have assumed the proportions of a plague. Over 10,000 lives have been sacrificed during the past year in England and Wales. In London, 5,641 deaths have occurred since Christmas. Of 9,392 patients in the London smallpox hospitals, no less than 6,854 had been vaccinated, nearly 73%. Taking the mortality at 17.5% of those attacked and the deaths this year in the whole country at 10,000, it will follow that more than 122,000 vaccinated persons have suffered from smallpox. Can we greatly wonder that the opponents of vaccination should point to such statistics as an evidence of the failure of the system? The Lancet, July 15, 18, 71. Speaker 1: Because of the severe and sometimes fatal results of the procedure and the government's steadfast support of forced vaccination through fines and imprisonment, that people were pushed to revolt. In 18/85, many people took the streets of Leicester, England to protest. During the demonstration, thousands of prosecutions were being brought up against parents who resisted vaccination. Speaker 8: The widespread opposition to the enforcement of the compulsory clauses of the vaccination acts, which exists in Leicester, culminated yesterday in a great demonstration, which was carried out very successfully. The position which the inhabitants of the town have assumed with regard to this question is due to a variety of causes. At the present moment, there are over 5,000 persons being summoned for refusing to comply with the law. Summons issued in the year 18/84 only reached 7 or a little over 1 summons in every 2 months, while at the present moment, 45 summonses are being heard and disposed of every week. But even the disposal of 45 defendants every week is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the case, and the defaulters and the objectors increase faster than the cases can be dealt with. The Times, March 24, 18, 85. Speaker 1: Thousands of bright people started a historic rebellion that successfully countered the prevailing medical belief and heavy handed government rule. Due to mass protests, Lester's government pushing for vaccination through fines and jail time was replaced with a new government opposed to compulsory vaccination. As a result, by 18/87, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%. The medical profession proclaimed that the Leicester residents would suffer greatly for their decision to turn their backs on vaccination. Speaker 4: An unvaccinated child is like a bag of gunpowder which might blow up the whole school, and ought not, therefore, to be admitted to a school unless he is vaccinated. Sir Dominic Corrigan, MD, 18/71. Speaker 1: However, smallpox deaths continue to decline over the years, even as vaccination rates continue to decrease, Spreading this rebellion movement to the rest of England and the world. Speaker 9: During 18 96, a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the south and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it, smallpox, was usually at first mistaken for chickenpox or some new disease called Cuban itch, elephant itch, Spanish measles, Japanese measles, bumps, impetigo, Puerto Rico scratches, Manila scab, Puerto Rico itch, army itch, African itch, cedar itch, Manila itch, bean itch, Dobie itch, Filipino itch, itch, kangaroo itch, Hungarian itch, Italian itch, bold hives, eruptive grip, bean pox, water pox, or swinepox. Charles v Chapin, 19 13. Speaker 1: Smallpox deaths continue despite this strange mix of ingredients. All labeled as vaccines being promoted by medical men, and enforced by strict laws. This chart shows despite high levels of vaccination in Lester England, deaths from smallpox epidemics continued and did not decline until vaccination rates dropped. This can be seen for all of England. As vaccination rates dropped, so did smallpox deaths. This chart of deaths for various age groups in Lester England shows that during the time of strict vaccination laws and high vaccination rates, childhood deaths remained about the same. However, it wasn't until the 18 seventies 18 eighties that deaths from smallpox decreased, which was the same time as the decrease in deaths caused by illnesses like measles, whooping coughs, scarlet fever, typhoid, tuberculosis, and others. By the late 1800, despite falling vaccination rates, smallpox became a mild disease similar to chickenpox. The case fatality rate once as high as 1 in 5 fell by over 98%. All pox faded away and was no longer a threat like all the other diseases that were once big killers. Despite declining vaccination rates and smallpox being considered mild and vanishing, the established medical system continue to push vaccination. Yet, after over 60 years of low vaccination rates, the experiment at Leicester proved an unmitigated success. Speaker 3: In Leicester, England, during the 62 years since infant vaccination was abandoned, there have been only 53 deaths from smallpox. And in the past 40 years, only 2 deaths. Moreover, the experience in Lester is confirmed, and strongly confirmed, by that of the whole country. Vaccination has been steadily declining ever since the conscience clause was introduced. Until now, nearly 2 thirds of the children born are not vaccinated. Yet smallpox mortality has also declined until now quite negligible. In the 14 years, 1933 to 1946, there were only 28 deaths in a population of some 40,000,000, And among those 28, there was not a single death of an infant under 1 year of age. C, Killick Millard, MD, 1948. Speaker 1: The belief that vaccination was needed to stop smallpox proved not only to be untrue, but dangerous and frequently deadly. Speaker 6: For my own part, it is long since I have positively refused to vaccinate at any price, while the successful results of the smallpox cases I have treated are beyond appeal. In a word, I maintain that vaccination is a bauble gilded over, indeed, by act of parliament, but which is a bauble still with which doctors rock too often to a fatal sleep, the gullible children of the world. Doctor a h Caron, Paris, France, 18/81. Speaker 1: Over the many decades, countless deaths and injuries resulted from vaccination, yet these were widely ignored. This chart shows the officially recorded deaths from vaccination. From 18 59 to 1920 2, official deaths related to vaccination totaled more than 1600 in England alone. However, deaths due to vaccination were more often attributed to different reasons, to anything possible besides the vaccine. Speaker 4: Hundreds of cases are recorded in which the death of infants who were healthy up to the hour of vaccination followed after greater or lesser periods of suffering, often horrible suffering, the insertion of vaccine. The suffering generally dating from the operation, and disease steadily advancing therefrom. The vaccinating doctors for the most part deny all connections between the vaccination and the death, and influence coroner's juries to pronounce death from some other cause. J Garth Wilkinson, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, Scotland, 18 eighties. Speaker 1: Most medical men supported vaccination, but some spoke out highlighting vaccination failures, injuries, and deaths. Hundreds of doctors witnessed and published their observations of vaccine failures and the adverse and sometimes fatal impacts of vaccination. Speaker 3: I have seen hundreds of children killed by vaccination. William Hitchman, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, consulting surgeon to the cancer hospital, Leeds, formerly a public vaccinator, Liverpool, England, late 1800. Speaker 6: The multitude of those who have untimely graves on account of this brainless abomination of modern surgery, vaccination, is a large one. Doctor. C. S. Carr, editor of the Columbus Medical Journal, early 1900s. Speaker 4: From experience, I have seen more evils result from vaccination than I ever saw result from smallpox. In the first place, I have seen direct fatal results from vaccination. In the second place, I have seen chronic incurably chronic disease, the result of vaccination and death after the lapse of many years. And in the third place, I have see introduced into the system through vaccination diseases of a destructive character, especially syphilis. I was vaccinated when a boy, and a few years afterwards, I took smallpox. I vaccinated my first four children. One of them died certainly from vaccination, and another was never strong after he was vaccinated. I would rather be shot than have any one of my family vaccinated. John Le Gay Brereton, Esquire, MD, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, September 20, 18 81. Speaker 10: After 50 years experience, I arrived at the conclusion that vaccination was not only useless as a preventative, but dangerous. I declined the risk of vaccination and would not vaccinate my bitterest enemy. Thomas Brett, MD, London, England, in a speech given on April 17, 1883. Speaker 3: Since blood poisoning of our children was enforced by act of parliament, smallpox has increased both in extent and frequency. Now vaccination by calfpox, cowpox, or humanizedpox, whatever may be the multiplicity of lymphs. And pure vaccine is only a rhetorical euphemism for horse grease, is an eruptive disease, setting in with febrile symptoms, followed by papule, vesicle, and pustule in about 8 days. And what else is smallpox? I have recently dissected more than a dozen children whose deaths were caused by vaccination, and no smallpox. However, black could have left more hideous traces of its malignant sores, foul sloughing, hearts empty or congested with clots, than did some of these little victims. Shame. Indeed, scarcely a day elapses, but I am called upon to witness the sufferings of vaccinated children in the form of cerebral and gastric complications, persistent vomiting, bronchitis, diarrhea, with pustules in the mouth or throat, pharynx, on the eyelids, and ulceration of the cornea, which remains opaque and may lead to blindness. William Heichman, MD, 40 years experience as a doctor of medicine, 18/79. Speaker 6: From the History of the Reign of Queen Victoria, an English work published in the year 1900, I quote the following extract. Official statistics prove that 26,000 children have been annually slaughtered by the poisoned lancets of public vaccinators, and 100,000 injured yearly by unvaccinated diseases. Bear in mind that this appalling slaughter of the innocents by the medical herrods is stated to have taken place in the British possessions alone during the reign of the late Queen Victoria. In view of this terrible slaughter of children by the vaccine Lancet in the British Kingdom, What must be the aggregate number of helpless children who are annually immolated on the altar of the vaccine idol in all the generalized countries of the world? In the English Digest of Parliamentary Returns, number 488, session of 18 78, entitled Vaccination Mortality. I find recorded this appalling statement. 25,000 children are slaughtered annually by disease inoculated into the system by vaccination. J W Hodge, MD, Niagara Falls, New York, 1912. Speaker 9: The system, vaccination, has doubtless caused more misery and mortality since its introduction by Jenner in 17 98 than that caused by war, pestilence and famine. And could the dead speak, they would denounce the unclean thing in such unequivocal terms as would cause vaccinators to hide their heads in shame. C Wardell Amerridge, MD, 18 95. Speaker 1: Brutal suffering and deaths from vaccination were experienced by 1,000, but only occasionally documented, and still more rarely with pictures of the victims. Speaker 11: The above photographs are of miss Fannie Lent of Cincinnati, Ohio. She was vaccinated when a child and thereafter became a mass of running sores. She visited Zion City a few years ago and has since died. She suffered the tortures of hell and was a sight that would melt a heart of stone. These pictures tell the story of what vaccination can do and has done in thousands of cases. The time has come to down the dirty doctors, and drive vaccination back to hell where it came from. Leaves of healing, 1915. Speaker 12: Benjamin f Ollwein, Altoona, Pennsylvania. Vaccinated in winter of 18 95, being then in good health and smooth and clean of skin. About 2 months later, a sarcomatous tumor began to develop where the sore had not yet healed properly. The tumor continued to grow and spread until it reached the enormous proportions shown in cut, which was made from a photograph. Wracked with intense pain and untold misery, suffering the most excruciating torments conceivable, The poor man was relieved only by laying down his life as a sacrifice on the altar of stupid indifference and professional incompetency. R. E. McNamara, professor of physiology, chemistry, histology, Universal Chiropractic College, 1913. Speaker 5: John Fander, child of healthy Swiss parents, born the 23rd September 18, 75, was healthy until vaccinated. Was a sturdy and beautiful child, as were also his 4 brothers and sisters. He walked at the age of 9 months. On 16th June 18 76, he was vaccinated by the official vaccinator. 8 days later his feet began to swell, abscesses formed, his teeth began to rot, his glands to swell. Fistulus sores appeared on his hands and feet. The above photograph was taken in May, 18/82. He could neither walk nor stand several of the bones of his hands had rotted out. It was such cases as this and the spirit of liberty, not yet dead in Switzerland, which led that freedom loving people to reject on a referendum the infamous system of blood poisoning, Yelped vaccination, which a medical clique was seeking to impose upon them. When will the good sense, parental affection and love of liberty of Americans rise to the level of the brave burghers of Switzerland? There are thousands of such cases in this doctor ridden land. Surely, the spirit of freedom, the good sense, and parental affection will soon arise and banish forever this murderous outrage and insidious cause of so much disease and death. Montague r Leverson, MD, 18 96. Speaker 1: Yet with all the available information showing the deaths and injuries over the many decades from vaccination, the vaccination proved ineffective, and that smallpox deaths plummeted with it becoming as mild as chickenpox despite falling vaccination rates. The medical system's obsession with vaccination remains. By 1968, smallpox vaccination continued with many more people being injured or killed by vaccination. All with the misguided medical notion of protecting people from smallpox while willingly sacrificing people's lives without their consent on the altar of vaccination. Speaker 5: The mortality and morbidity from routine infant smallpox vaccination in this country is now truly appalling when compared to the risk of smallpox. Analysis of data obtained from a review of questionnaires received from 19,616 physicians surveyed by us suggested that the estimated number of complications in 1963 was approximately 3,000. With 10 to 18 deaths among a total of 14,000,000 persons vaccinated. The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time, there have probably been 200 to 300 deaths From smallpox vaccination, the majority of workers in the field of public health sincerely feel that the current morbidity and mortality from routine vaccination is the price we have to pay for keeping our country free of smallpox. C Henry Kemp, professor and chairman, department of pediatrics, 1968.
RBystrianyk
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 2:02 PM
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 3:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a testimony from Dr. John Le Gay Brereton, a member of the Royal College of Surgeons, who spoke out against smallpox vaccination over 140 years ago. He claimed that vaccination led to more harm than smallpox itself, citing direct fatalities, chronic diseases, and even the introduction of severe illnesses like syphilis. He shared personal experiences, noting that after his own vaccination, he contracted smallpox, and tragically, one of his children died from vaccination. He expressed a strong aversion to vaccinating his family.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

This is from a doctor’s testimony from over 140 years ago on the smallpox vaccination. He was among many hundreds of doctors who determined the smallpox vaccine was an utter failure, but mythology combined with professional hubris, massive profits, and governmental laws caused vaccination to continue and eventually evolve into numerous other concoctions. “From experience I have seen more evils result from vaccination than I ever saw result from small-pox. In the first place, I have seen direct fatal results from vaccination. In the second place, I have seen chronic-incurably chronic-disease the result of vaccination, and death after the lapse of many years; and, in the third place, I have see introduced into the system, through vaccination, diseases of a destructive character, especially syphilis. I was vaccinated when a boy, and a few years afterwards I took small-pox. I vaccinated my first four children. One of them died certainly from vaccination, and another was never strong after he was vaccinated. I would rather be shot than have anyone of my family vaccinated.” ― John Le Gay Brereton, Esq., MD, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, September 20, 1881 [“John Le Gay Bereton, Esq., MD, MRCS, LAC,” New South Wales, Compulsory Vaccination, Presented to the Parliament by Command, September 20, 1881, Sydney: Thomas Richards, Government Printer, pp. 1043-1046.]

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to John Legay Brereton, MD, he has seen more evils result from vaccination than from smallpox. He claims to have witnessed direct fatal results, chronic incurable diseases, and the introduction of destructive diseases like syphilis through vaccination. Brereton states he was vaccinated as a boy and later contracted smallpox. He also claims one of his first four children died from vaccination, and another was never strong afterward. Brereton concludes he would rather be shot than have any of his family vaccinated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From experience, I have seen more evils result from vaccination than I ever saw result from smallpox. In the first place, I have seen direct fatal results from vaccination. In the 2nd place, I have seen chronic incurable chronic disease, the result of vaccination and death after the lapse of many years. And in the 3rd place, I have see introduced into the system through vaccination diseases of a destructive character, especially syphilis. I was vaccinated when a boy and a few years afterwards, I took smallpox. I vaccinated my first four children. One of them died certainly from vaccination and another was never strong after he was vaccinated. I would rather be shots than have any one of my family vaccinated. John Legay Brereton, Esquire, MD, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, September 20, 18 81.
RBystrianyk
Posted - October 4, 2024 at 10:27 PM
Saved - October 5, 2024 at 5:00 PM

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

It's one of the greatest medical lies ever told. https://t.co/OW1ILXogn3

RBystrianyk
Posted - August 25, 2024 at 12:38 PM
Saved - August 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on how much time we've spent fixating on infectious diseases, especially when history shows that deaths from these illnesses decreased significantly without vaccines or medical interventions. I believe the real key to health lies in adopting a wellness-focused lifestyle. This includes a nutritious diet, clean water, regular exercise, sunshine, nature, restful sleep, meaningful social connections, and a sense of purpose. We don't need to live in fear; it's time to ignore the fearmongers and embrace a joyful, positive life.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

What a colossal amount of time humanity has wasted obsessing over infectious diseases when history clearly shows that deaths from these illnesses declined by nearly 100%—without any vaccine or before any vaccine or, for that matter, any medical interventions at all. The real key to health isn't hiding from bacteria or viruses but embracing a lifestyle rooted in wellness. A nutritious whole foods diet, clean drinking water, regular exercise, sunshine, time in nature, restful sleep, genuine social connections, and a life of meaning—these are the true foundations of health. You don’t need to live in panic and fear. It's time to tune out the fearmongers and choose to live joyfully and positively.

RBystrianyk
Posted - August 12, 2024 at 5:34 PM
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a study that raises serious concerns about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. The research describes strange, animated structures found in the injectables, including worm-like entities and complex three-dimensional shapes. These findings suggest contamination levels far beyond what is acceptable and hint at the presence of nanotechnology in the vaccines. The visual evidence presented in the study is alarming and challenges the perception of these products as safe and effective.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Well, this is the kind of mRNA garbage that Pfizer injected into millions. Does this look normal? Does it look “safe and effective?” This looks like some science fiction, mad scientist, Star Trek Borg technology. But, no, this is from a published study of what happens when you look at these diabolical concoctions. [Young Mi Lee, MD and Daniel Broudy, PhD, “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study,” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, July 18, 2024, pp. 1180-1244, https://mail.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102/282] @P_McCulloughMD

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

From the study abstract. If this doesn't freak you out what will? “There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation, simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time. Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.”

RBystrianyk
Posted - August 3, 2024 at 5:14 PM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stanley Plotkin, a prominent figure in vaccine development, testified in 2018 about his past practices in vaccine research. He acknowledged that using mentally handicapped individuals for studies was not uncommon in the 1960s, though he couldn't recall specific instances. He also admitted to using babies of incarcerated mothers and individuals under colonial rule, including in the Belgian Congo, where nearly a million people were involved. His statements raised ethical concerns reminiscent of historical abuses in medical research.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Stanley Plotkin, the Godfather of vaccines, testified in 2018. Isn’t it shocking how those who researched and made these vaccines thought nothing of experimenting on anyone they thought they could? How many other drugs were and are still tested on those that these experimenters decide they can do so on? Is this attitude any different than those from Nazi Germany that decide that they could experiment on those that were lesser than them? Transcript of videotaped deposition of Stanley A. Plotkin, M.D. New Hope, Pennsylvania. January 11, 2018. Video starting at 7:50:51. Q Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? A I don't recollect ever doing studies in mentally handicapped individuals. At the time in the 1960s, it was not an uncommon practice. Q So you're saying -- I'm not clear on your answer. I'm sorry. Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? A What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s, it was not unusual to do that. And I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. ... Q Is one of the things you wrote: The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential? A Yes. Q It may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I do not think that it is difficult to distinguish nonfunctioning persons from members of ethnic, racial, economic, or other groups. A Mm-hmm. Q Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? A Yes. Q Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? A Yes. Q Did you do so in the Belgian Congo? A Yes. Q Did that experiment involve almost a million people? A Well -- well, all right, yes. https://archive.org/details/2015-831539-DM https://www.lumenfidei.ie/documents/dr-stanley-plotkin-testimony.pdf

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org
RBystrianyk
Posted - April 2, 2024 at 5:14 PM
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The definition of polio changed in India in 1997, leading to a shift in paralysis cases labeled as AFP. Paralysis cases increased until 2012 when they began to decline. A study found that there were additional paralyzed children beyond expected numbers.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Does Bill Gates or the WHO know or even care? In India in 1997, the definition of polio changed, and many paralysis cases shifted to AFP – Acute Flaccid Paralysis. If we use the old polio definition, we can see paralysis cases have shot up and only began to decline in 2012, with the number of oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses administered to children each year gradually reduced. “(a) Up to 1996 all reported cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) were labeled as polio cases, but no follow up was done. (b) From 1997 onwards, an AFP case has been labeled as polio in the presence of one or more of the following: (i) wild polio virus detected in stool sample, (ii) residual paralysis observed after a period of 60 days of onset of paralysis. (iii) the patient has died, or (iv) the patient is lost to follow up.” Yash Paul, “Polio Eradication Programme: A Failure,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 41, no. 43/44, November 4-10, 2006, pp. 4538–4540. “A total of 640,000 children developed NPAFP in the years 2000–2017, suggesting that there were an additional 491,000 paralyzed children above our expected numbers for children with NPAFP.” Rachana Dhiman, Sandeep C. Prakash, V. Sreenivas, and Jacob Puliye, “Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, August 2018, vol. 15, issue 8, pp. 1755–1762.

RBystrianyk
Posted - March 29, 2024 at 5:04 PM
Saved - March 30, 2024 at 3:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Doctors often choose to remain silent even when they know their actions may be wrong. Dr. Guernsey, over a century ago, explained that it takes courage to go against the norm and risk being labeled a "crank." Many choose to follow the expectations of Health Boards and prioritize financial gain. (1901) - Wm. Jefferson Guernsey MD, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Ever wonder why doctors don’t speak up even if they know their actions might be wrong? Dr. Guernsey knew the answer over 100 years ago. “There is no denying the fact that it requires considerable courage to be aggressive even in the most justifiable cause, and it is assuredly pleasanter and more profitable to do what the numerous Health Boards require, and to pocket the fee therefore, than to refuse the pecuniary benefit and acquire the reputation of being a “crank” in the bargain.” (1901) Wm. Jefferson Guernsey MD, Philadelphia, “Letters Regarding Vaccination,” Homeopathic Recorder, vol. XVI, no. 12, December 1901, pp. 529–536. — Wm. Jefferson Guernsey MD, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

RBystrianyk
Posted - March 26, 2024 at 10:34 PM
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 10:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Sweden, examinations in 1978 revealed that 84% of children with pertussis had received three doses of vaccine. Due to concerns over its effectiveness and safety, the whooping cough vaccination was discontinued in 1979. Interestingly, there was no increase in deaths during the 17-year period without vaccination. Deaths were already minimal before vaccination began in 1953.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Did you know In Sweden, examinations in 1978 showed that 84% of children who were verified to have pertussis had previously received three doses of vaccine. As a result, the whole-cell DTP vaccine was deemed ineffective. Combined with the concerns over its safety, the Swedish health ministry recommended discontinuation of the whooping cough vaccination in 1979. From 1979 to 1996 (17 years), there was no national vaccination program. However, notice that there isn’t any increase in deaths, which were close to zero before they began vaccinating in 1953.

RBystrianyk
Posted - March 26, 2024 at 10:48 PM
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 9:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1810, Charles Maclean, MD, wrote a book highlighting how deaths from vaccination were suppressed and not reported. He mentioned that some practitioners chose not to see the deaths, while others were afraid to speak up. This situation is reminiscent of the present-day discussions on vaccine-related deaths and transparency.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Did you know that in 1810, just a few years (1798) after the vaccination fad took over the medical profession, Charles Maclean, MD, wrote a book On the State of Vaccination in 1810. In it, he commented how deaths from vaccination were suppressed because the vaccinators chose not to see the deaths, and others were afraid to say anything. Sound familiar? “Very few deaths from cow-pox appear in the Bills of Mortality, owing to the means which have been used to suppress knowledge of them. Neither were deaths, diseases and failures transmitted in great abundance from the country, not because they did not happen, but because some practitioners were interested in not seeing them, and others who did see them were afraid of announcing what they knew.” Charles Maclean, MD, On the State of Vaccination in 1810, p. 101.

RBystrianyk
Posted - February 24, 2024 at 3:27 PM
Saved - February 25, 2024 at 3:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 1800s, a small group of medical fanatics and government officials in England made it law for all children to be subjected to a smallpox vaccine. The vaccine was administered by scratching the arm with a lancet and smearing a mixture of bacteria, fungus, and pus from various sources into the wound. This arm-to-arm vaccination practice lasted for 100 years. The author questions whether this procedure was a good idea and asks if it should be allowed for oneself or their children.

@RBystrianyk - Roman Bystrianyk

Did you know the original smallpox vaccine was filled with bacteria, fungus, and who knows what else? This concoction was forced onto the people by a small group of medical fanatics and government officials who made it law. In 1800s England, all children by 3 months of age were forced to be subjected to this experiment. And at the time, it wasn’t a nice clean needle. No. It was taking a lancet (a very sharp instrument), putting numerous scratches onto your arm, and smearing this stuff into that wound. Not only that, but the source of this “vaccine” could be pus from a cow, horse, goat, sheep, buffalo, etc., or even from someone suffering from smallpox that was scratched onto a cow first. And for 100 years, arm-to-arm vaccination was practiced, passing this mixture from person to person. Do you think this was a good idea? Would you allow this procedure to be done on you or your children? Does this sound like the greatest medical invention in history to you? Dr. R. Swinburne Clymer, MD, PhD, Vaccination Brought Home to You, 1904, Terre Haute, Indiana, p. 48.

View Full Interactive Feed