TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Rach_IC
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Here's the latest in the fascist lawfare against this longtime Maricopa County prosecutor merely for prosecuting Antifa. The Pinal County Attorney has exonerated her of all criminal charges, which the sleazy MaRICOpa County Attorney's Office was encouraging and the sleazy former MaRICOpa County Sheriff Penzone was pushing. However, Sponsel's law license was suspended for two years and so that still needs to be reversed. As you can guess, not a single MSM outlet has covered her exoneration, nor the exoneration of the five Phoenix Police officers involved. Not one. 🤡🤡🤡🤡 But the MSM all piled on and heavily covered the bar trial against her, selectively. And I'm the only reporter who actually provided the full story there. I'm going to stay on this. The courts need to do the right thing and reverse the sleazy bar disciplinary judge's opinion suspending this longtime prosecutor with an impeccable reputation; I remember doing court coverage for her back in the 2000s. https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/pinal-county-attorney-exonerates-former-maricopa-county-prosecutor-of-criminal-charges-who-prosecuted-antifa-along-with-police-officers/ralexander/2024/11/15/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Here is a second article I've written about the outcomes of the 92 election cases challenging 2020 election corruption. This one focuses on the fact the judges didn't consider evidence and didn't look into whether there was election fraud or not - many of them even admitted it in their rulings that the lawsuits weren't about election fraud. It's a red herring by the left that you need to prove election fraud - countless elections were overturned in the past for merely small violations of law, and as my first article went over, judges ruled in favor of our plaintiffs in several cases because there was merely the possibility election fraud might occur. Thanks to @PatrickByrne for encouraging me to do this report or I would likely have never gotten around to it.
@michaelpleahy - MichaelPatrick Leahy
Outcomes of 92 election cases from 2020 reveal judges did NOT review evidence or address election fraud. @Rach_IC reports: https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/outcomes-of-the-92-election-cases-from-the-2020-election-reveal-that-judges-didnt-review-evidence-or-address-election-fraud-part-2/ralexander/2024/03/14/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Wow. I've only written one article so far on the Tina Peters prosecution trial, and Fascistbook is already taking it down. This is unreal, not only am I the former Maricopa County Elections attorney and a former prosecutor, but I have been a journalist for years, and not just a wannabe journalist but even going back to law school I was on the editorial board at the University of Arizona Daily Wildcat. I guess it doesn't matter how qualified you are on a topic as a journalist, if you're a conservative they will 1984 you out of existence as if you aren't even writing articles. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Powerful message from Kari Lake's brave election attorney Bryan Blehm, who the State Bar of Arizona is trying to disbar, without even giving him a trial! (I've never even heard of that) He calls out attorneys who are sitting by watching the political prosecutions and disbarments while doing nothing, and refers to Stephen Richer as an "authoritarian dickweed." 😹😹😹😹
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
The alleged Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes held a press conference explaining why she got Arizona's alternate slate of electors for Trump from 2020 indicted, and I believe it was so full of mistruths and incorrect interpretations of the law that I wrote this article explaining the problems with her justification of the lawfare putting patriots in prison for doing the exact same thing that patriots have done historically in presidential elections.
@michaelpleahy - MichaelPatrick Leahy
Far left AZ AG Kris Mayes really gets the law wrong when she tries to explain why she got a grand jury to indict 11 alternate Trump electors. @Rach_IC reports https://arizonasuntimes.com/elections/election-integrity/attorney-general-kris-mayes-explains-why-she-is-prosecuting-arizonas-2020-alternate-slate-of-electors-for-trump-gets-law-wrong/ralexander/2024/04/25/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito is going over his audit of the Fulton County election. His audit - 60% error rate - results did not match ballot images. Tally sheet totals didn’t match the ballot images. Found falsified tally sheets - 100 to nothing for Biden. Some were 200 to nothing, a technical impossibility. Whereas the ballot images showed a 60-40 ratio of Biden to Trump. https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/VOTERGA-Raffensperger-Congress-Letter-Refutation.pdf
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
They found 200k duplicate scanned ballots, but ongoing research has bumped that number up to 375k. The hand audit count was short - 17k votes had no ballot images. Dr. Spock confirmed that in the Raffensperger case, called them Cast Vote Records.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
A ballot image is necessary to create a CVR. It’s not possible to have more votes than ballot images. It’s like creating votes out of thin air.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, DC Bar disciplinary counsel Hamilton Fox, who has gone after several Trump attorneys, just tried to yet Yale Law Professor E. Donald Elliot disqualified from testifying - merely because his expert report didn't specifically mention one of the ethical violations Clark was accused of by number! He paraphrased talking about it and mentioned all the other ones.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
I don't mean to freak people out, but one of the top conservatives in the country told me today they are basically concerned we're shortly headed for financial economic collapse, and so I've gotta write an article about it and what people need to do. If it wasn't this person saying it, I wouldn't be so concerned, but this is someone who has access to all the best intel. Not sure when I'll get to it, since I'm a bit backed up with articles, but it will be within a month and will go over how exactly the collapse is expected to happen. Am hearing it will dwarf the 2008 crash.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Please spread this story, it's been suppressed - and thousands, if not millions, of people may be needlessly suffering since they're not getting this information. This 82-year-old retired nuclear physicist beat and reversed Parkinson's (his hair is even growing back), and is now the 5th top fencing champion in the country for his age bracket and the No. 1 in Arizona, yet the medical community is completely ignoring him, even though he's offered himself as a test subject. I met with him for several hours the other day since folks knew I'd get the word out. (And for the record I didn't get a dime for any of this, my opinion articles are my hobby - this does nothing for me but make big pharma mad.) https://wnd.com/2023/11/elderly-man-reverses-parkinsons-medical-community-ignores/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
If anyone wants to talk to Hans, please DM me. He's wonderful, so smart, and just wants to help others.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Oh boy, writing this up next! As election integrity investigators continue digging, it is becoming less and less likely that there were "accidental mistakes" at MaRICOpa County on election day, but bad actors making deliberate decisions. I've maintained all along that a bad actor probably remotely changed the printer settings at the polling locations, primarily the reddest polling locations. This latest accusation would show that it was even worse, that the plotting went on in advance of the election in regards to the Logic & Accuracy testing.
@WethePeopleAZA1 - We the People AZ Alliance
🚨 Breaking Court Documents. Kari Lake Appellate brief filed late last night shows Maricopa County lied about the 2022 L&A Test and a plan to rig the election. Read Full Brief Here: https://shorturl.at/bCZ56
@wendyp4545 - Wendy Patterson
@Rach_IC @mkj279 Say it with me. Election Fraud.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Retired DoD analyst Ray Blehar testifying in the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman is going over an affidavit he prepared for litigation in Pennsylvania over the 2020 election. He said there was vote laundering - subtracting votes from a candidate and moving them to a third party. His summary stated: My analysis of the data relating to Pennsylvania’s 2020 general election concludes that there were numerous anomalies and/or inconsistencies in the results and that an estimated 280,000 – 300,000 Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, and Green Party electors (voters) were disenfranchised because their votes were manipulated (i.e., changed) by the election system software, election administrators, and/or by introduction of other disruptive software (i.e., malware) or a combination of the three. https://www.scribd.com/document/495093088/Blehar-Affidavit-12-20-2020-1349EST
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Here is my analysis of the attorneys taking guilty plea deals in the fascist RICO prosecution in Georgia. I rarely use the word fascist about the Democrats, but this warrants it. I've talked to a couple of the 19 defendants about it, and this is probably the most Stalinesque behavior I've seen by Democrats in my lifetime. CC: @DonaldJTrumpJr @elonmusk https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2023/10/30/fascist-prosecution-law-fare-forcing-trump-attorneys-to-take-guilty-pleas-in-georgia-n2630529
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
The bar disciplinary trial against Maricopa County prosecutor April Sponsel just wrapped up, and it is yet another horrendous political witch hunt against a conservative attorney. All she did was prosecute violent Antifa members who attacked the police in 2020 as well as other rioters using gang statutes instead of just a slap on the wrist - something Utah prosecutors did too and nothing happened to them - but when the MSM started writing articles making the prosecution look bad, her superiors - including current Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell - threw her under the bus and dropped the charges. And you can guarantee those rioters are going to get fat, easily handed out huge settlements from taxpayers over it now, and based on prior precedent, they won't even need to sue to get them! #LAWFARE https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/bar-disciplinary-trial-wraps-up-against-former-maricopa-county-prosecutor-who-charged-antifa-demonstrators-at-violent-protest-in-phoenix/ralexander/2023/11/03/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
My friend watching the trial just emailed me this - Re: State Bar Rules Respondent’s Counsel: Objection. Your Honor, State Bar rules require that Respondent receive a fair trial. The Russian Judge: There’s a rule? Respondent’s Counsel: Yes. There are no exceptions. The Russian Judge: O.K. Overruled.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
So far the California bar's aggravating witness Justin Grimmer is testifying about something that Eastman already thoroughly refuted in testimony on Oct. 24. Basically, Grimmer is trying to say that the decline in signature rejection rate in the 2020 election in Georgia wasn't very significant. But he has the exact same numbers of ballots rejected that the Geels report found - a huge decrease in ballots rejected compared to 2016. Eastman said Grimmer likes to point out that if you only look at the signature verification category, it declined from .28 percent in 2016 to .15 percent in 2020, Grimmer is acting like that's not much of a decline. But it’s a 46 percent decline in rejection rate attributable only to signature rejection. Eastman said that amounted to 6,500 votes, “more than half the total margin [that Biden won by] in the whole state on just that one issue.” If this is the best the California bar has for aggravating evidence, it's really sad and embarrassing.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
The California bar's charges against Trump's attorney John Eastman are just riddled with lies. Eastman is going over them one by one, and here's how he refutes this one - "On January 6, 2021, before the Joint Session of Congress began, Pence publicly rejected respondent’s proposed plan in a written statement that concluded: 'It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not.'” Eastman explained that he had suggested to Pence that he could DELAY the certification to allow the state legislatures to investigate, he wasn't demanding that Pence decide not to count certain votes. The bar is having to twist and distort what Eastman actually did to try and make him look worse - but even if he had advised Pence to reject slates, this trial has conclusively proven there was substantial legal and historical precedent to do so.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman, he is discussing how Georgia continued counting ballots at the State Farm Arena without observers present on election night, sending them home without telling them they were reconvening, which violated Georgia law, so they were counted illegally. He's getting the point across that when laws are broken, the votes are illegal - there doesn't need to be a finding of actual election fraud to make the votes illegal.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In his disbarment trial, Trump's attorney John Eastman is discussing how he spoke with two experts on how it was possible for ballots to be pre-loaded into the machines. One showed him a chart that laid out the points of vulnerability in the process where a rogue actor could manipulate them.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Does anyone have this chart from Joe Oltmann handy? Of course it's been practically scrubbed off the internet 🙄🙄🙄🙄
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
This is the chart being discussed in the trial, from Joe Oltmann showing how phantom votes could be inserted. https://t.co/CAGEt8ABQG
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
My lefty friend messaged me this about some of the Georgia defendants taking plea deals: "They’re all admitting it was a hoax under oath and with evidence and you still believe it." Well, if I was in their shoes facing long years of prison time, I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing, I haven't analyzed the cases closely yet but if anyone knows this area better than anyone, it's @SidneyPowell1 who wrote "Licensed to Lie" about corrupt prosecutors. I responded to him with this regarding my position - https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/martin-niemoeller-first-they-came-for-the-socialists You see, it's very easy to take the left's position if you only listen to their clichés and ignore everything else. They'll say "of course the big cities went for Biden heavily, they're heavily Democratic, they did a big GOTV effort there, and Trump has become really hated by the left." Makes sense superficially, in a vacuum, right? What they cleverly leave out is things like the violation of the Law of Large Numbers, how all the "anomalies" in the election favored Democrats. They also leave out the fact that reputable polls like Rasmussen all had Trump winning in those states - in Arizona, Rasmussen had Trump winning by 4 points a few days before the election, beyond the margin of error. Similarly, Rasmussen's exit poll after the 2022 election had @KariLake winning by 8 points - that's not just beyond the margin of error, that's an insane amount ahead. (https://arizonasuntimes.com/elections/election-integrity/new-late-exit-poll-finds-eight-percent-more-arizona-voters-said-they-voted-for-lake-over-hobbs/ralexander/2023/03/17/) Don't let them frame the debate, Democrats have always been worse at logic, their arguments are full of fallacies and red herrings and the only way they win is by omitting key details, spinning, and changing the debate and semantics.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman, the Democrat donating, election fraud denying judge is refusing to allow him to discuss the book Debunked? because he didn't read it until January 2023. She just threatened to stop his attorney from direct examining him and move to cross! The book is ALL ABOUT the 2020 election corruption. 🤡🤡🤡🤡https://www.amazon.com/Debunked-auditor-reviews-election_and-lessons/dp/1645720756
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Professor William B. Allen, who supervised John Eastman while he was getting his PhD, is testifying in Eastman's disbarment trial as a character witness. He just said the charges against Eastman were unsubstantiated and the judge told him he's not allowed to discuss that. This is who Allen is - https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/education/2023/07/25/william-b-allen-florida-black-history-curriculum-denounces-critics-kamala-harris/70461016007/
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
During his disciplinary trial, Trump's attorney John Eastman said his involvement with 2020 election lawsuits focused on the illegal and unconstitutional activity by officials, NOT election fraud, since “fraud has to be pled with particularity and until you get to discovery that is very difficult to do.” The left constantly gloats that fraud hasn't been proven in these cases, but the reality is courts order new elections when there's been regular lawbreaking, the laws don't require a showing of fraud. I cited a bunch of previous cases in this article - it was no problem for these judges since the new elections weren't benefitting Republicans over Democrats. https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2022/12/26/the-dismissal-of-kari-lakes-election-lawsuit-shows-voter-disenfranchisement-no-longer-matters-n2617566 I've started referring to it as "election corruption" instead of "election fraud" for that reason; although we all KNOW it's fraud, the left is playing games.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In his disbarment trial, Trump's attorney John Eastman is explaining how after he told Pence it would be foolish to reject the contested electoral slates, but should look into merely delaying the certification so the state legislatures could investigate the fraud, he could tell the tone of the meeting changed and it no longer appeared that Trump or Pence were considering rejecting the electors, but only possibly delaying them. This is utterly destroying the whole premise of the bar's case that Eastman told Trump and Pence to reject them.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Finally. Now that John Eastman has actually gotten one of his witnesses designated an expert, statistician Dr. Stanley Young, the statistical PhDs team's contrast analysis of the 2020 presidential election is finally being thoroughly discussed without constant objections and stricken testimony. That report looked at 48 states, broken down by county, and compared the increases in votes that Biden got in 2020 compared to Hillary Clinton in 2016, with helpful graphs in addition to the raw numbers. https://election-integrity.info/Contrast_Report.pdf
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
If I could say only one sentence about the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman, after watching the first six weeks of it, this would be it: The fact that one of the top constitutional legal scholars in the country - possibly the #1 on the right - is convinced there was massive election fraud in the 2020 election, means it cannot be blown off as a "conspiracy theory."
@4freedom1USA - Crystal M Stanley
Not only was the January Sixth incident not the worst insurrection in the history of the United States, it wasn't the worst attack in the history of the US Capitol, not even close. It wasn't even in the top half dozen. As the Capitol has been blown up on multiple occasions. in the 1950s, Puerto Rican nationalists broke into the Capitol and started shooting congressmen. Five of them were injured in that. And what happened later on to those people? Jimmy Carter, liberal darling, let them off the hook. What happened to the weather underground when they came in and blew up the Capitol, blew up part of the Capitol? Well, Bill Ayers basically got off the hook for his involvement with Weather Underground and went on to become a mentor to Barack Obama. What happened to the half dozen mostly left -wing attacks? We don't even remember them.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Just venting. As a conservative reporter, I have to work far longer hours than left-wing reporters because so much has been scrubbed off the internet. Even if you use alternative search engines. Try to find the "Ryan Report" about 2020 election fraud on the internet. And if anyone has any tips on doing internet searches for this kind of thing, with better results than Duck Duck Go, please let me know. They are literally Orwellianing us and our views out of existence.🤬🤬🤬🤬
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
I don't expect @elonmusk to be allowed to buy Google. But he is far smarter and has more vision than people realize. He may actually solve this problem another way (see my recent article - https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2023/09/11/column-n2628222)
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
In the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman, physicist and auditor John Droz just said that the Nevada forensic audit found over 130,000 instances of voter fraud. The judge of course refused to allow the testimony in, but the key thing people need to remember is unlike other reports by Droz which did merely statistical analyses, this report, which was led by attorney Jesse Binnall, actually has real numbers on fraud. You might want to bookmark this report since the left always claims there is no evidence of actual fraud or specific numbers. https://hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Binnall-2020-12-16.pdf And if you want more like this, sign up for Droz's biweekly email updates on his site https://election-integrity.info
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
You're gonna wanna bookmark this. This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them. https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Berkeley law professor John Yoo testifying at the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman is going over how the founders had a big fight over how the president would be selected, ended up with the electoral college as a compromise. He said that is originalism expert Ackerman’s view too in his article (https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?httpsredir=1&article=1627&context=faculty_publications…). The founders rejected the option that Congress determines it, which would have been more of a parliamentary system. Hence why it appears that VPs Jefferson and Adams made substantive determinations about accepting electoral slates in 1796 and 1800.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Now that Trump's attorney John Eastman is allowed to present his defense in his disbarment trial, it's frankly incredible all the evidence coming out about election fraud in 2020 that was never allowed to come out in the election challenges. Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge Michael Gableman, who the legislature contracted with to conduct a small investigation into the election, is currently discussing the bombshell revelation about how election officials removed the requirement to have bipartisan observers present when collecting votes from nursing homes, and so the sheriff referred the election officials for criminal charges. The election officials (WEC) said during a meeting that was videotaped that they knew they were breaking the law by telling the clerks to disregard the law and just mail the ballots to nursing home residents.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
The testimony by the first witness Trump's attorney John Eastman called to put on his side of the case in his disbarment trial has been nothing less than explosive. The trial ended for the day with more bombshells. He revealed that the Zuckbucks, $8.8 million from Zuckerberg's Center for Tech & Civic Life (CTCL) provided to Wisconsin's five large cities, violated the law. He said he doesn't call them "grants," he refers to it as "employment contracts," since the CTCL employees actually go work with the clerks' offices and get to see information about voters that the public can't access as easily (the public has to pay $12,500 for voter roll info, only gets a snapshot of that instant, and usually has to wait 4-5 days for it, so there's no way to determine whether someone was made active 2 weeks before the election then deactivated 2 weeks after the election). Also since if the clerks don't comply with CTCL's requirements, they have a huge penalty of giving money back. Those CTCL employees are able to determine if a voter was likely to vote for Trump or Biden. They were allowed to see voters who had requested ballots but hadn't returned them, then go chase them down to get their ballots. The CTCL employees were "embedded" in the clerks' offices and "running the elections." Yet the Zuckerbergs had made statements they wanted to defeat Trump. He also said votes were "illegally cast" that were dropped off in the drop boxes, since the drop boxes violated the law by not being placed near the clerks' offices - which the WI Supreme Court reaffimed; instead the clerks let CTCL dictate where they must be placed. The guy the Zuckerbergs hired to run this had written a book on how to defeat Trump, where he said the election would be won dueling it out block by block in these types of big cities.
@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander
Here's the reality folks. Thanks to @JenWEsq for explaining the process & numbers. It's gonna take $10 mill which is not easy to raise, and then there are plenty of hurdles. Efforts to Begin Recalling Katie Hobbs Can Start in June, But Face Uphill Battle https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/efforts-to-begin-recalling-katie-hobbs-can-start-in-june-but-face-uphill-battle/ralexander/2023/04/30/
