TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Rauhallinen

Posted - August 19, 2021 at 6:49 AM

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 3:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A conversation discusses the publication of a study documenting the sale of protected species in Wuhan's markets. The origin of the idea that bats and pangolins were sold there is questioned. The mention of Colonel Cao and the confusion surrounding their affiliation is brought up. A link to an article is shared.

@Rauhallinen - Matti

Tämä on vihdoin julkaistu! "Here we document 47,381 individuals from 38 species, including 31 protected species sold between May 2017 and November 2019 in Wuhan’s markets.' https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-91470-2

Animal sales from Wuhan wet markets immediately prior to the COVID-19 pandemic - Scientific Reports Here we document 47,381 individuals from 38 species, including 31 protected species sold between May 2017 and November 2019 in Wuhan’s markets. We note that no pangolins (or bats) were traded, supporting reformed opinion that pangolins were not likely the spillover host at the source of the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. While we caution against the misattribution of COVID-19’s origins, the wild animals on sale in Wuhan suffered poor welfare and hygiene conditions and we detail a range of other zoonotic infections they can potentially vector. Nevertheless, in a precautionary response to COVID-19, China’s Ministries temporarily banned all wildlife trade on 26th Jan 2020 until the COVID-19 pandemic concludes, and permanently banned eating and trading terrestrial wild (non-livestock) animals for food on 24th Feb 2020. These interventions, intended to protect human health, redress previous trading and enforcement inconsistencies, and will have collateral benefits for global biodiversity conservation and animal welfare. nature.com

@MikaelNiku - Mikael Niku

@Rauhallinen Täh! Mihinkäs se käsitys alunperin perustuikaan, että siellä shoppailtiin nimenomaan lepakoita ja muurahaiskäpyjä, ja kaupan päällisinä sai zoonoosin?

@MikaelNiku - Mikael Niku

@IlmariMttnen @Rauhallinen Ei varmaan mitenkään. En vaan nyt enää muista (enkä viitsi kaivaa jos joku muistaa 😇) että mihin tämä lepakko / muurahaiskäpy -ajatus alunperin perustui. Vissiin joku näki niitä torilla, vaikka tilastoon ei kirjattu, tai jotain?

@tkaasalainen - Tuomas Kaasalainen

@MikaelNiku @IlmariMttnen @Rauhallinen Minä muistan! Tieto tuli Naturen kautta eversti Caolta. Itselleni on vielä hämärän peitossa edustiko Cao tuossa artikkelissa Kiinan armeijaa, Wuhan Institute of Virologya vai One Healthia. Vähän taitavat roolit mennä sekaisin noissa organisaatioissa🫡 https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/coronavirus/the-covid-files-australianfunded-coronavirus-paper-used-in-chinese-military-facility/news-story/7241a6b112816f3951495e0fa52ed2aa

Daily Telegraph No Cookies dailytelegraph.com.au