TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RealAmVoice
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
WE WILL REMOVE THE JEW HATERS! - @realdonaldtrump https://t.co/pTcV2DLjyg
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "We will remove the jihadist sympathizers and Jew haters."
- "We're gonna remove the Jew haters who do nothing to help our country."
- "They only want to destroy our country, and we will never let the horrors of October 7 be repeated here on Americans."
- "We will not let that happen, and we will solve the problem that we have."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will remove the jihadist sympathizers and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew haters who do nothing to help our country. They only want to destroy our country, and we will never let the horrors of October 7 be repeated here on Americans. We will not let that happen, and we will solve the problem that we have.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
GEO-TRACKING HOLDS THE KEY @StephenGardnerX: “The geofencing data will prove it. They can trace Tyler Robinson’s exact path—from the tunnel to the roof, the shot, and the getaway. The cell-phone trail may be the strongest evidence yet in Charlie Kirk’s murder.” @JackPosobiec https://t.co/7Eg0rmFh69
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on forensic cell phone tracking and geofencing data, the same methods that were used to track individuals in January 6 cases, including whether someone went onto the steps, onto the lawn, or exactly where they were. The speakers indicate that investigators can determine an individual’s precise movements and locations through cell phone data.
The key point is that in this case, it will become clear whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, and whether the text messages that have raised questions—whether those messages were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg—place Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main outcome anticipated is clarity about Robinson’s location, but importantly, the discussion emphasizes the ability to reconstruct movements and associations from cell phone data.
The speakers note that people are asking how Robinson could have known about certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school, and they argue that Google Maps alone would not explain this. They assert that the path of his cell phone—whether he went the day before or weeks before—will be accessible, allowing investigators to track his movements comprehensively. A forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, is cited as saying they would be able to trace his movement from 8 Hundredth Street, down through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, where the shot was taken, and then to him running into the woods.
The conversation also references conspiracy videos claiming to see him on a cafe’s security system—claiming his car is visible—arguing that this is not necessarily inconsistent with a murderer’s behavior, since a killer could be in a car while amped up on adrenaline. The speakers explain that the cafe owner could only review such surveillance if the FBI tracked him to that location; they discuss how geolocation and surveillance data would be used to corroborate movements, including how, the next morning at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, he swipes a credit card and the authorities follow his phone, tracking when he goes home, whether he visits Lance, and when he visits his parents, with a full trail of calls, texts, and movements.
The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, emphasizes that aside from the gun, the cell phone data will be the key element tying Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day, addressing doubts about the FBI’s methods and reliability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Break. You were telling us though about the cell phone tracking, that forensic cell phone tracking geofencing data. We know the same exact method of tracking individuals was used in January 6. They were tracking, did someone go on to the steps? Did they go in?
Were they on the lawn? Where were they exactly? And we know that investigators using cell phone data can do this. What did you find regarding that data in this case?
Speaker 1: So we're gonna know with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages that many of us have questions about, whether those were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg. Was Lance Twigg in Southern Utah, or was he also in Orem? All of that is going to come out. But the main thing is people are saying, okay. How would he have known based on this weird terrain, not being a student at this school?
How would he have known this? Because I don't believe you could have planned this murder from Google Maps. So they're going to know based on his cell phone, pathway whether he went on the day before, a couple of weeks before. They'll be able to track all of that. Now I was told from forensic expert a forensic expert, Joseph Scott, that they're going to be able to track him from 8 Hundredth Street down through the tunnel, up around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, run into the woods.
And then I started seeing all of these conspiracy videos that they were able to find him on a little cafe's security system. You can barely see his car, but you can see it. And you had all these conspiracy people saying, how does a guy kill Charlie Kirk, and twenty minutes later, he's, in his car in a parking lot? That's not consistent with what a murderer would do. Well, you don't know how a murderer thinks.
Right? He might be sitting in that car amped up on adrenaline. But how did how did the cafe owner know that he was caught on his security camera? Because unless somebody breaks in, you don't just go review, you know, twenty four hours worth of video footage. It's because the FBI tracked him to that location.
The next morning, 07:15AM, Cedar City Maverick gas station. How do they know it's him? He swipes a credit card, and they follow his phone. They know when he goes home. They know if he goes to visit Lance, when he goes over to his parents.
They've got all of it, the phone calls, the texting, everything. So, this forensic expert, basically, Joseph Scott Morgan, he shared with me that next to the gun, the cell phone data is going to be the the thing that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on that building. And right now, there's a lot of doubt. Oh, I don't know if I can trust the FBI. Well, that that, geotracking, that geofencing, it's going to it's going to tell us where his phone was at all times on that day.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
AG: SUBPOENAS OVER FBI WITCH HUNT COMING "Biden era officials at the DOJ and FBI politically targeting certain individuals." There are almost 100 individuals and organizations targeted on the list they found. @AGJamesUthmeier @DBrodyReports https://t.co/bTaeVghFV9
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "the senate judiciary committee confirmed yesterday what many of us knew had been the case. Biden era officials at the Department of Justice and FBI, politically targeting, certain individuals."
- "And look, there is no room for malicious prosecution or political witch hunts in our system of justice."
- "As you mentioned, on the list of almost a 100 individuals and organizations, had Turning Point USA, our own Republican Attorneys General Association, that is our political arm, was also targeted."
- "Everybody at home knows what was done to president Trump. This is wrong. It's unlawful, and we're gonna hold people accountable."
- "So I don't have names yet. We're gonna start at the top, and we're gonna go as broad as we can."
- "We're going to use every civil and criminal tool, including civil rights violations that are at our fingertips."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you so much for being here, James. So what specific laws or abuses are you investigating with these subpoenas? Like, who's at the top of your list? What's the strategy? Good morning to you.
Speaker 1: Good morning. Thanks for having me. Yeah. The senate judiciary committee confirmed yesterday what many of us knew had been the case. Biden era officials at the Department of Justice and FBI, politically targeting, certain individuals.
And look, there is no room for malicious prosecution or political witch hunts in our system of justice. As you mentioned, on the list of almost a 100 individuals and organizations, had Turning Point USA, our own Republican Attorneys General Association, that is our political arm, was also targeted. Everybody at home knows what was done to president Trump. This is wrong. It's unlawful, and we're gonna hold people accountable.
So I don't have names yet. We're gonna start at the top, and we're gonna go as broad as we can. We're going to use every civil and criminal tool, including civil rights violations that are at our fingertips. And we'll have subpoenas going out within a week and ongoing to get to the bottom of how broad it is, who was involved, and ultimately we're going to hold people accountable.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
CHARLIE KIRK FIRES BACK AT VAN JONES "The attacker said, quote, 'I got that white girl.' The moment we make them live up to their own standard, they start to cry foul." — @charliekirk11 https://t.co/mAN4CCI1lH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Van Jones is accused of lying; speaker notes he “never said the first element… I did say the second part.” The attacker of Irina Zerutska allegedly said, “I got that white girl,” showing racialization. The media is charged with moral posturing until forced to live up to “the George Floyd standard.” The speaker calls Van Jones a “race hustler, Marxist,” and invites him on the program, declaring his tricks won’t work. The claim is that there is no evidence Derek Chauvin acted racially; Keith Ellison said no racial animus. The speaker cites a tweet: “if a random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person… it would be a huge national story.” He asks Jones to apologize for criminal justice reform that allowed “14 time criminal offenders” to walk the streets; “you are the architect and the designer” of this. Ben Shapiro is next.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Van Jones was talking about me, and there's so much there's so many lies involved in what he said here. First of all, I never said the first element of what he said. I did say the second part, but this is a very important thing to focus on. So Van Jones is saying I should be ashamed of myself. And just reminder, the murder of Irina Zerutska, did you know that the attacker said, quote, I got that white girl?
The attacker racialized this just for the record. Now mind you, do you notice that the media all of a sudden tries to play the moral high ground when we start to try to make them live up to the standard that they created and the construct that they forced and the paradigm that they constituted under George Floyd, the moment that we make them have to live up to their own standard, they start to cry foul. As soon as we start to make them live up to the George Floyd standard, oh, what is Charlie Kirk racializing this? And by the way, Van Jones also has a major lie embedded into this whole thing. Listen carefully.
Race hustler, Marxist, Van Jones. By way, Van, you're welcome on my program. I'll treat you well. I will give you an uninterrupted opening statement. Van Jones, if you wanna go talk about black crime and urban decay, man, you're always welcome on this program.
Because even though, quote, unquote, you're a expert in race hustling, I've been around the block a couple times. I I I I know your tricks, and they they don't work here. Your your magical spells don't work here. You're a little hocus pocus. You are racist.
Doesn't work here. We got holy water here. Play cut three fifty one.
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk to say, we know he did it because she's white when there's no evidence of that. It's just pure race, race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong. Then he says that if something like that had happened the other way, there'd be sweeping changes imposed on society. Where is the George Floyd policing act?
It didn't pass. Even when you had a white police officer murder a black man on live television, the whole world saw there were no sweeping changes. In fact, not not one law was passed at the federal level that we don't know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this man was hurting. Hurt people hurt people. What happened was horrible.
Someone like Charlie Kirk, he should be ashamed of himself. No one mentioned the word race, white, black, or anything except him. Okay.
Speaker 0: So there there there's a lot there's a lot there. First of all, when Keith Ellison, the attorney general of Minnesota, was asked repeatedly by the media, was there racial animus involved in Derek Chauvin's actions against George Floyd? He said no, and they dodged the question. Do you know that there is no evidence that Derek Chauvin acted racially? If you think Derek Chauvin acted racially, then you're a racist and parting racial type fantasies and mythologies into a situation of which it doesn't exist.
And by the way, just if you're taking notes, media matters, George Floyd overdosed. Okay? You can write that down, take it to the bank. In fact, we have Ben Shapiro coming up next segment of which I'm going to have him remind us of all the facts. Anyway, that's not what this is even about.
Here is the tweet that I sent out. Quote, if a random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person for no reason, it would be an apocalyptically huge national story used to impose national sweeping political changes on the whole country. Of course, this is true. Everybody know this is true. Our media thirst for stories like this.
I want you to imagine if a white guy sitting on a bus and a black woman just on her phone, all of a sudden, the white guy took out a knife and just stabbed her in the neck repeatedly. How do you think our media would react? We would have protest. Wendy's would boy, I'll tell you right now. There would be a 100 burned Wendy's around the world.
I mean, in every city. I mean, they would be so on on top, they'd start burning the Denny's. They use Emmett Till seventy years later because of this, because it's a case of a horrifying murder of an innocent black person by hateful whites. It's so rare they had to go back seventy years, but you know what? When a white person is murdered, we don't burn down the country.
But when George Floyd overdosed on drugs, it's Floydapalooza. But for the opposite, we have to go back one day. Literally, there was another you know, several happened this last week. Another white girl was just murdered by a black person in Alabama, a woman butchered walking her dog. There was also one that happened in South Carolina and one that happened in Virginia.
That is four white women in the American South that just recently were butchered by black criminals. So we take a step back and say, well, what's really going on here? What's really going on here is a situation where Van Jones is acting like I said something I did not say, when in reality, we're asking a very simple question, mister Jones. Very simple question, which is, will you apologize for all the criminal justice reform that you pushed forward that allowed these 14 time criminal offenders to walk the streets? Because you are the architect and the designer of constantly feeling bad for the criminal that then can kill more people like Irina Zorutska.
And by the way, I did not bring up race. The attacker said, quote, I got that white girl, end quote. People say, why does the race matter? Oh, it matters because you made us care about race in the 2020. Looks like you got live up to the book of your own rules.
The second that we make you live up to your ridiculous paradigm, you collapse like a house of cards. Ben Shapiro is next.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
FORMER DC POLICE INTEL CHIEF: PROUD BOYS WERE COOPERATIVE “My objective was the safety for anybody that breathed oxygen.” Former MPD Intel head says Enrique Tarrio provided direct info to help prevent violence—and never lied. @CowboyLogic_RAV https://t.co/gyqruYaI1U
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Beginning in September 2017, I took over the intelligence branch for the the police department."
"Beginning in July 2019 there was a big First Amendment demonstration plant for Washington, D. C. Called Demand Free Speech."
"I was put in touch with Enrique Tarrio, and he provided me the social media posts that, where the threats were made."
"We drilled down on it, and that was my first encounter with Enrique."
"So he and I developed a working relationship where he would contact me whenever he came to Washington, D. C. And would provide me with information such as what hotels they were planning on staying at, where they were planning on demonstrating, if they were planning on any marches, their march routes."
"Your role was to ensure the safety of everyone, whether it was other law enforcement, it was Proud Boys, it was BLM, it was Antifa, it was the general population."
"I was providing it to all the federal agencies who are assisting us, FBI, Capitol Police, Secret Service."
"And at no time did he ever lie to me."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want you to go back into, 2020 at some point, maybe 2019, and, let's find out why you're here with us right now.
Speaker 1: Oh, sounds great. Well, as Donna mentioned, twenty three year veteran with the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department. Beginning in September 2017, I took over the intelligence branch for the the police department. And some of my my duties included looking for any type of threats for First Amendment demonstrations or assemblies that were occurring in Washington, D. C, and also monitoring those First Amendment demonstrations for any type of criminal or terrorist activity conducted under the guise of the lawful First Amendment demonstrations.
Beginning in July 2019, there was a big First Amendment demonstration plant for Washington, D. C. Called Demand Free Speech. It was a conservative event. Enrique Tarrio was slated to speak at it, and some of the Proud Boys were going be there as kind of unofficial security for the event.
One of my duties, as I mentioned, was to investigate any type of threats. We spoke with the organizer of that event, and she indicated to me that the Proud Boys and Enrique Tarrio had received social media threats. Groups were talking about throwing myriatic acid filled balloons at them. I was put in touch with Enrique Tarrio, and he provided me the social media posts that, where the threats were made. We drilled down on it, and that was my first encounter with Enrique.
And given the fact that whenever the Proud Boys came into the city, they were a very controversial group, They oftentimes clashed with BLM and Antifa groups. So he and I developed a working relationship where he would contact me whenever he came to Washington, D. C. And would provide me with information such as what hotels they were planning on staying at, where they were planning on demonstrating, if they were planning on any marches, their march routes. So I could inform our Special Operations Division, which is the unit that supplies all the uniformed officers who provide security for these events and kind of traffic control and that nature.
So we could ensure safety for everybody, the citizens of DC, for law enforcement, for the demonstrators, and any counter groups that that may be there. So a lot of people know
Speaker 2: Well, let me just tell remind everybody. Enrique Theriault is the Proud Boy leader that got twenty two years, and he wasn't even in DC on January 6. That's how insane this whole thing is, but continue. I'm sorry
Speaker 0: to interrupt you. Before you continue, I wanna I wanna draw attention to something, and that is your role was to ensure the safety of everyone, whether it was other law enforcement, it was Proud Boys, it was BLM, it was, Antifa, it was the general population. Your role was to do what seek intel and then send that. As you guys learned from, when we had Tarek Johnson on here, there are two very separate categories in law enforcement, intel, operations. And, Shane would then provide that information that he gathered to operations so they knew how to prepare.
But your entire objective was the safety for anybody that breathed oxygen.
Speaker 1: That's absolutely correct. And not only was I providing that information to our operations, but I was providing it to all the federal agencies who are assisting us, FBI, Capitol Police, Secret Service. I mean, you name it, all those three letter agencies I was providing that information to. And mine, I mean, was absolutely critical because I was getting it directly from the source, from the leader of the Proud Boys. We found out as these events progressed and the violence and the unrest increased, as these events occurred, we started seeing a lot of social engineering on social media or false flags where counter groups would send out false information.
So I was contacting the head of the Proud Boys, it doesn't get any better than that, find the actual truth, what they were planning on doing. And at no time did he ever lie to me. I never found him to be like untruthful or hiding information. He was always honest and forthright with the information that he was providing me and that I was providing to my chain of command.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
RICKARDS: WAR COULD’VE ENDED IN ONE CALL @RealJimRickards says Putin’s terms were clear—neutral Ukraine, no NATO, limited military. Europe wanted it blown up. Instead of peace, the war drags on with more bloodshed. @bannons_warroom https://t.co/iIUcyQrLV4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin's terms for Ukraine: neutrality, no NATO, demilitarization with a possible paramilitary or federal force, and Russia would gain Donetsk, Luhansk, Zeppeziriya, Kherson, with Crimea already theirs. A five-minute deal could be done by phone with Trump, but that didn't happen. The summit's main gain was Trump hearing Putin unfiltered, one-on-one, without European or Ukrainian filters. Trump left saying a peace process would begin; Putin seeks a broader European security settlement to move beyond World War II. In Hannity, Trump said it's serious when two nuclear powers come together; Russia has 8,000 nuclear warheads, larger than the U.S. Trump's losses included the ultimatum and secondary sanctions, which yielded nothing, and India faced some sanctions with no consequences. Europe, described as US vassals and lacking military—Russia has 20 divisions in Ukraine and 20 more ready—emerges as a winner hoping the war continues; more Ukrainian deaths likely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What are Putin's terms? He wants neutrality for Ukraine. Not unprecedented, by the way. Austria was neutral during most of the Cold War. Not today.
They're pro West, but they were they were neutral. So neutrality for Ukraine. No NATO, obviously. Demilitarization, they might have a paramilitary force, kind of like a, you know, federal or but but no military. And then Putin and then Russia was gonna get the land.
They were gonna get Donetsk, Luhansk, Zeppeziriya, Kherson. Of course, they already have Crimea, And that was it. And unless you're prepared to do and you could have that deal in five minutes with a phone call with Trump. Trump's not quite there yet. So what so it was easy to see that there wasn't gonna be a deal.
Now what did happen in the summit? What what happened in the room? And, you know, I wasn't an accurate just to be clear, but it's not easy to to gather not difficult to gather the information. The the biggest benefit, the best thing that came out of this summit was that Trump got to listen to Putin unfiltered, one on one in the back of the car, in the room, etcetera, maybe two other people in the room, but but that was it. You didn't have Marco Rubio fronting for the Europeans.
You didn't have general Kellogg fronting for the Ukrainians. You didn't have Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton talking about bone crushing sanctions. You know, that's their their their favorite word. You didn't have all those filters around them. You just had Trump and Putin.
And Trump is, you know, obviously smart enough to more than smart enough to listen to Putin and take him at his word. Now Trump walks out and says, okay. We're not gonna have a bad deal. Well, we're gonna start a peace process. That's what Putin has said all along.
He doesn't want this to be just about Ukraine. He wants this to be about the European security situation. Basically, as you put it, getting World War two behind us and going on going on in the future. He wants a a much bigger platform. By the way, Juan, not to not to nitpick, but in Trump's interview with Hannity, he said, you know, it's serious when two nuclear powers come together.
Yeah. That's true. I said, we're number one. Russia's number two. That's not correct.
Russia's number one. We're number two. They have more they have 8,000 nuclear warheads. So Trump had the right instinct that this was this could not have been more serious, but Russia actually has a larger nuclear arsenal than than than we do. So Trump's Trump had wins and losses.
His losses were he he looks bad on the ultimatum. He laid down the ultimatum. Nothing came of it. He looks bad on secondary sanctions. He threatened them and, you know, again, nothing came of it.
India got slapped a little bit, but India doesn't care. And then the third thing he said, there'll be terrible consequences if Putin doesn't that Putin doesn't agree, and there are no consequences. They're gonna have continuing dialogue. By the way, it's it's good that Trump failed on those three things. They were all they were all bad ideas, and I said so at the time.
So so that's good. So now we're moving on to what Putin has always wanted, which will give us peace in Ukraine, which is a much broader settlement along those lines. As far as the Europeans are con concerned, Steve, you brought them up. They're vassals. I mean, there's no better way no no other way really to understand the European world.
They're vassals of The United States. It's unusual for vassals to talk back to their master, but you know, whatever you gotta tolerate. They don't have it. They don't have any military. They Russia has 20 divisions in Ukraine and 20 more ready to go, you know, back in Russia ready to move in.
Europe couldn't put together three divisions if they tried. I mean, that would be probably two from The UK and maybe one from Germany and France. They'd have to scrape together some French foreign legion. They don't have any troops. They don't have any weapons.
They don't have any money. Other than that, you know, it's all good. So so Europe is but in a way, and this is strange, Europe comes out of this as a winner, and here's why. They want the war to continue. Well, the war is going to continue because Trump didn't apparently get the message where Putin really wanted early enough, and they've done everything possible.
They they did everything possible to blow up this summit. And to that extent, they succeeded. Now you got more dead Ukrainians on their on their hands, put blood on their hands, but they don't really really seem to care. So the war's gonna continue.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
WALTERS: TEACHERS UNIONS PUSH ANTI-AMERICAN, ANTI-SEMITIC AGENDAS @ryanmwalters praises Trump for ending federal control of schools, slams NEA for erasing Jews from Holocaust lessons—calling it “pure anti-Semitism” and indoctrination. @jakejakeny https://t.co/8rPJzHjPs3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Oklahoma is going to be eliminating testing. "That's correct." The plan, described as returning power to the states, proposes collecting information in real time "what about if we collect information in real time? So that way, you know how your students are performing throughout the year, not just at the end of the year," and to allow parents to see how the schools are performing, thereby reducing federal overreach. It contrasts with the Biden administration, which "wanted no part of it" and "wanted all the federal power" to dictate testing and curriculum. The discussion condemns standardized testing as anti intellectual. The NEA is accused of erasing "the word Jews from learning about the Holocaust" in a World War two history unit, described as "pure antisemitism" and "hate America." "I thank god for president Trump every day for eliminating the federal department of education" and a call to continue the fight against the teachers' unions: "They're after the kids. They're trying to destroy the country."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oklahoma is going to be eliminating some testing. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: That's correct. You know, with the new Trump administration bringing power back to the states, one of the things we asked him about was, you know, we've had all these federal testing requirements that end up being a nightmare for parents. Kids hate them. The teachers say, hey. We we already collect a lot of this information.
And we say, well, what's a better way of doing it? And we said, what about if we collect information in real time? So that way, you know how your students are performing throughout the year, not just at the end of the year. Then you turn in all that information so parents can see how the schools are performing. And this keeps us from this federal overreach of dictating to the state what our testing models will look like.
And so we went to the Trump administration. They were all for it. We go, wow. This is a lot easier than under Joe Biden. They wanted no part of it.
They wanted all the federal power. They wanted to dictate from the federal government what kind of testing would be, what kind of curriculum there would be. And the Trump administration goes, great. More power to you. So we were very excited for this announcement.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And listen. For those of you who know this, better than I do, the whole idea of teaching to a test is so anti intellectual, and it makes kids hate learning. And it also and in very in a lot of cases, is is a way that they can insert politics and stuff that that really isn't needed. I mean, some of the best schools out there have long ago, banned politics and gossip from the schools.
I mean, honestly, this this is a long time coming. I am not a fan of the standardized testing. I know I understand that there are some good points behind it. You wanna see if the schools are doing their job. But, honestly, at the schools that are really failing, the fact that they're not teaching to a test, that's that's the least of their problems.
Ryan, before people get up in arms though about fact the fact that states like yours are are going against the educational establishment and what the teachers unions want, I wanna look for a second at something that happened that hardly anyone has covered. The National Education Association, the NEA, which is the second largest teachers union in America, you know, they come out with their suggested suggested curricula. And in their new suggestion for their World War two history unit, they have erased the word Jews from learning about the Holocaust. Now, look, there were a lot of people killed during the Holocaust who weren't Jewish, but still, the overwhelming majority were Jews. And, obviously, that was the major impetus.
I mean, these are the people that we want to trust teaching our kids. There's no good reason to erase that other than some kind of crazy political agenda. I'm not even sure I wanna know what it is.
Speaker 1: It's because they hate America and they hate America's allies. I mean, this is pure antisemitism. I mean, just the sickening nature of you've had 6,000,000 Jews exterminated in the Holocaust, and you've got the NEA that go, yeah, we we shouldn't talk about that part of it. I mean, that just shows you it is because of their hatred for America and they're pushing against America can't be the good guy in any story. Israel can't be the good guy in any story.
The good the Jews can't be the good guy in any story that the NEA wants your kids to know because they want to indoctrinate your kids. They don't want them to be proud of this country. They don't want them to be proud of America's allies. It is absolutely sick, the agenda that the NEA, the National Teachers Unions, have tried to push on your kids. I thank god for president Trump every day for eliminating the federal department of education because that was their apparatus to force us into your schools, but we have gotta continue this fight against the teachers' unions.
Guys, they're after the kids. They're trying to destroy the country. We have to stand firm against them.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
"WHAT IF WE LAUNCHED SOMETHING CALLED 'FBI LEAKS?'" @JamesOKeefeIII releasing some new footage exposing the corruption in the FBI currently. One being caught just this year! @TPUSA https://t.co/s3a90Nopue
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker announces the launch of "FBI Leaks," a project to release audio and video of FBI officials speaking off the record. The first video features Deputy National Intelligence Officer Rami Hassan discussing the Epstein case, calling it a "shit show" and suggesting law enforcement "turned a blind eye."
The speaker calls on insiders to reveal the truth, referencing past encounters with individuals from the Pentagon and Department of Defense. They highlight Jamie Menina, a former FBI special agent and "spy hunter" caught on hidden camera.
The speaker recounts being attacked and discredited, including being sued and allegedly blackmailed by a lawyer representing intelligence agents who threatened to expose undercover sources if they didn't cooperate and provide funding. Despite these challenges, the speaker vows to continue their work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I I have an idea. What if we launch something called FBI leaks? How about that? How about we release audio and video? Listen, you know, whether they come to me on the record or off the record, they tend to be more honest off the record.
So perhaps we need to publish what they're saying off the record. We have to do that. And in our first video released right now online, we're gonna release the deputy national intelligence officer of the FBI whose name is Rami Hassan, and he's talking about the Epstein case. And he says, I'm with the FBI, quote, it's a shit show. And this is I'm just gonna play a little clip.
You can find the rest of it online. Show. Is a voice, mister. I met with FBI. He also talks about he talks about that you can kind of see where law enforcement kind of either turned a blind eye or missed things.
This man is a director, and he's saying law enforcement turned a blind eye. The question is, what did they turn a blind eye to? And I'm calling on everyone on the inside with knowledge of the situation to come out, to tell the truth, because we, the American people, have a right to know. Now, I have been doing this a lot recently in the deep state, and some of this stuff you can't make up. We've met with people in the Pentagon, the Department of Defense.
Remember this guy, Jamie Menina? He's a former FBI special agent within the Department of Defense, caught this year during the new administration, talking about what he does inside the intelligence to
Speaker 1: the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent. So I became a spy hunter. So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent of the FBI.
Speaker 0: Now he then proceeds to by the way, what about the irony of a guy who's a spy hunter being caught on hidden camera by my team? Thankfully, I'm not a Chinese spy. To the intelligence. Jamie, you're a spy hunter, you say. Well, I'm a spy hunter too, but I'm evidently a better spy hunter than you.
I have no permission to use that. Actually, we do. It's called the First Amendment. You talk about hunting spies. What if my undercover person was a Russian spy?
Go away, liar. You're a known fraudster. You have a poor reputation. No one believes you. Go away.
What the fuck out of here? Okay. So this is the former FBI This is what they do, by the way. They they attack you little little slings and arrows, little paper cuts taken a 100 times over. People stop trusting you, but you gotta keep going anyway.
Screaming at me that I'm a liar. In fact, they even got a lawyer to sue me. This guy who's a what I call an ambulance chaser for intelligence agents. And he sued me and said he's gonna expose all of our undercover people. He even tried to blackmail me saying that, well, if you cooperate with us and give us funding, we won't post the names of your sources.
These people play dirty, but we're not gonna give up.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“I believe they’ve been able to effectively get away with not investigating…Epstein’s intelligence connections because of the Pandora’s box that that opens…” @MikeBenzCyber says he knows what documents need to be published in order to show that this is a genuine investigation. https://t.co/p9VxtRcVHU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Jeffrey Epstein was connected to intelligence, as Vicki Ward reported, and that the DOJ was told to leave him alone in 2008. They claim there's been a cover-up and will publish a video detailing the exact documents the DOJ should seek and individuals to question.
The speaker believes the Epstein intelligence connection hasn't been investigated due to the Pandora's box it opens. They think public outrage might force some disclosure. The speaker attributes the suppression of information to a combination of donors and national security officials with intersecting interests who have influence over the White House and executive branch agencies.
They claim Trump World donors were involved in Epstein's network. If Epstein's intelligence ties are confirmed, every aspect of his career would be scrutinized to determine which intelligence agency was involved, triggering intense investigation into his dealings. This, combined with donor pressure, has created a power struggle for the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I believe quite strongly that Jeffrey Epstein is exactly as Vicki Ward reported. Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, justice department official Alex Acosta said that he belonged to intelligence, and the and the DOJ was told in in 2008 to leave him alone. And I believe that there has been a cover up of that aspect of the Jeffrey Epstein story, which obviously inverts the entire conception of Jeffrey Epstein, if indeed that is substantiated. And tonight, I will actually be publishing a detailed presentation video on the exact documents to be sought by the justice department so that there is no wiggle room to get out of this issue any longer. The exact documents to make public that I know the justice department has, the exact individuals to follow-up with and and to keep the American people apprised as to the the on the record statements those individuals should give to the DOJ.
I believe they've been able to effectively get away with not investigating the Epstein's intelligence connections because of the Pandora's box that that opens. But I I think that given the public outrage over this and the the intense pressure that's felt by so many in the admin combined with the knowledge that this is not going away, that they will at least have to give a little bit. And tonight, I'll be publishing a video about what exactly they need to give immediately in order to show that this is a genuine investigation and not a cover up.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The audience is certainly gonna be all over that. I I think why this audience is so upset and myself included at what has been going on because I think it's an affront to sort of what the core foundational values of the MAGA movement really rest upon, which is with these sort of establishment Republican belief and ideology that accountability is found in, you know, strongly worded letters and the tweets and the sort of perform performative politicking of the day. Now it seems like we're not even really getting that. We're being told that we just need to move on and not care about it.
Certainly, we're not getting prison sentences or anything in sort of that territory, frankly, on on a lot of verticals, on a lot of fronts. I'm just curious in sort of the, you know, botched dissemination, whether it was the binder stuff, now this weird letter. Where do you sort of maybe in your mind kind of reverse engineer? Obviously, we don't know the answer. But place the the blame, perhaps it's a loaded word, but sort of the issue with the release of these files.
Is this something that you know, is it is it the Trump adverbs? Is it politicals? Is it something that, you know, what we would colloquially refer to as the deep state? Is it a CIA thing? Where do you think that sort of urge to suppress this is really emanating from?
Speaker 0: I think it's a combination of donors and national security officials. I think that that they have intersecting interests on this, and they're both involved in the story, and they both have considerable influence on not just the the White House itself, but the agencies the the policies at all the executive branch agencies. I think that that part of part of the reason this is such a hot potato is because there are Trump World donors who have been intimately involved in this network. And part of the reason this is such a hot potato is because if they have to tell us about Epstein's ties, then they have to tell the world because the world reads our media. They they can't just, give us all national all 300,000,000 Americans national security clearances to access it.
It becomes public knowledge, which means the entire network effectively, would have its cover blown, and it would frankly generate a lot more questions than answers about every single thing. Once Epstein's intelligence ties are confirmed, then what that immediately proceeds to is a a intense forensic detailed microscopic investigation into every single thing that Epstein has done, everyone that he's handled money for, every company he's invested in, every region he did business in, every business leader he met with in order to effectively ask, okay. Well, was was that a CIA operation? Was that, you know, Israeli intelligence, Saudi intelligence, UK intelligence? What every single thing, you know, of of a storied four decade international jet setting career then gets opened up and infected by the intelligence label once Epstein does.
And so I think that in combination with donor pressure has been has has created a real bind that has put the White House squarely in the crosshairs of the power struggle between the voting base and the donors who provide the money.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
MTG CALLS FOR A NEW CENSUS IN AMERICA THAT ONLY COUNTS AMERICAN CITIZENS. @RepMTG joins @ericbolling to detail the Making American Elections Great Again Act, which aims to exclude illegals from the U.S. Census count. “This bill is extremely important.” https://t.co/VHcOPrUp3G
Video Transcript AI Summary
A bill is proposed to conduct a new census counting only American citizens, direct states to redistrict House seats based on this count, and outlaw non-citizen voting in federal elections. The goal is to ensure representation for American citizens and taxpayers, alleging the current system favors non-citizens and illegal immigrants.
Proponents claim Democrats aim to allow non-citizens to vote, citing examples in San Francisco and New York. Trump and DeSantis reportedly support the bill, believing a new census would shift House seats, benefiting states like Florida and Texas while reducing representation for states like California. They allege the 2020 election was rigged and the current census is flawed, leading to unfair apportionment. Supporters believe the bill will pass, exposing those who oppose it as wanting illegal votes to win elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I was talking with president Trump on the phone, and I told him that my idea is to have a bill that immediately calls for a a new census in America and only counts American citizens, does not count noncitizens, illegal aliens, and everyone that's living in The United States. The second part that the bill does is it will direct the states to call for new redistricting of house seats based on the count of American citizens in The United States. So that would drastically change most house seats. And that way, each district is truly represented by a representative representing American citizens only. The third and very important piece to this bill, Eric, is my bill will make it against the law and that no noncitizen can vote in federal elections.
And that's extremely important because Democrats have a a goal. They have an objective to allow noncitizens to vote in all of our in all of our elections. They already do it in San Francisco. They do it in New York, and they tried to do it here in Washington DC, but we wouldn't let them. And so this bill is extremely important.
I'm thankful to have president Trump's support. And, apparently, governor DeSantis too weighed in on that bill just the other day on Real America's Voice, by the way. And so we gotta get this bill passed on the house floor.
Speaker 1: Funny. It's funny you mentioned that because we happen to know the guy who asked that question. You may recognize him as well a little bit. But then let's take a look at how that went down. Again, we were at Alligator Alcatraz yesterday, and and this this gentleman named it's a really bright guy, who Trump seems to really like.
Brian Glenn, he happens to be Rev's own our own, White House correspondent asked the question. Listen.
Speaker 2: How many Americans with proof of citizenship are in our area, in
Speaker 3: our
Speaker 2: country, redistricting some of the house districts? Your thoughts on that.
Speaker 3: Well, I'll speak for both of us.
Speaker 2: We love it. Okay. You're gonna like this one.
Speaker 3: I know all about it. We have a wanna bring our elections back. The election in 2020 was rigged billions and millions of votes. It had to do with COVID and a lot of things, but it really had to do with the crooked people. The Democrats are very
Speaker 2: good at cheating on elections.
Speaker 3: And that's why I said too big to rig. They tried this one too. But after about 09/2002, they gave up too many votes. You know? Too big to rig.
Ron would love it. I would love it. Christie would love it. That's what they have to do. They have to bring it back.
And we have to look. You know, Ron, they they include anybody that happens to be in your state. California
Speaker 4: that California would lose, like, five seats if they did a fair census. And even beyond that, the Biden census jipped Florida of at least one seat. We only got one seat in the last census. Are you trying to tell me that Florida only had one seat in that? We should have had at least two.
Texas should have had another one. That could be the difference in the house of representatives and the majority. So I would love for them to redo the census for '26. My legislature will redistrict those lines. We'll get it to where it's fair.
But as it's right now, this country is not fairly apportioned. I've got so many more millions of people in Florida that have representation because of that flawed census. Mister mister president I
Speaker 3: I think it's gonna do very well. A lot of people I
Speaker 2: don't know if you've heard about it. It's like Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's captivated the country. Everybody wants it. It's gonna get in. It's gonna pass.
Speaker 1: What what a really common sense idea, and we can go through a couple of the fine the line items in there, for example, redrawing districts. Yeah. At least at least one more seat to Florida, at least one more seat to to Texas. California, I think they lost those two seats. Probably, lost four or five.
Maybe Illinois loses. New York should have lost more. I mean, it it makes so much sense. I think anyone who doesn't vote for this bill is exposing their showing their hand. Their cards are we want illegals to vote in our elections because that's the only way we can win, and that would be Democrats.
Speaker 0: Absolutely, Eric. And the great thing is about this bill is it truly gives the American people representation. Mhmm. It gives the American taxpayer representation, and it puts the American people's interest first and reigns in the federal government to have representatives that truly will represent American citizens. And that's where we've gotten way off track.
This federal government has not worked for the American people for decades now. And we know the Democrats, they don't care about the American people. They're representing illegals and cartels and and all the people that they flooded our country with illegally across the border for the past four years. So this is a bill I am so excited for, and I'm so grateful to have president Trump's support and his endorsement. And also governor DeSantis, I thought, explained it really well there, how a new census will drastically change the house of representatives in elections in 2023.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
FULL TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEW WITH STEVE BANNON https://t.co/YCR9RB2LdR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson expresses concern about the US potentially entering another Middle Eastern war, particularly with Iran, and criticizes voices promoting such intervention. He believes the focus should be on domestic issues like the economy and fentanyl crisis. Carlson says that Fox News has a history of promoting wars that don't benefit the US, though he likes the Murdochs personally.
He refutes claims of being anti-Israel, stating his concern is for America's interests. Carlson believes a regime change in Iran is the goal, but questions the plan's feasibility and consequences. He laments the lack of debate in Congress and criticizes the political system for not representing the people's views.
Carlson admires Trump and believes he sincerely seeks peace, but feels Trump's efforts are being undermined. He suggests the US is in a "post-coup country" since the Kennedy assassination, with leaders potentially facing physical threats. He advises Trump to prioritize peace, resist being rushed into war, and not let foreign issues jeopardize American security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got Dee Tucker Carlson in the war room. Brother, thank you. It's good to see This is by the way, you were here years ago, Andrew Breitbart. When Andrew Breitbart lived here, you were up at the top.
Speaker 1: I was joined the day it opened,
Speaker 0: and Yes.
Speaker 1: It looks exactly the same. I can't believe you're still here. I mean, that was fifteen years anyway.
Speaker 0: Fifteen years. So 02/2011, fourteen years going on fifteen to ten. Crazy. I know since you left DC, you're you're very hesitant to spend a lot of time here. Yes.
This is you're not you're this is not your favorite town anymore.
Speaker 1: I spent my whole life here. I have family here. I have close family here, so I I come back to see them, but not not very often.
Speaker 0: Why are you in town? You're gonna spend a couple days in town, which is quite
Speaker 1: I'm interviewing various people. The president's gone, but I'm seeing a bunch of people and, you know, there's a lot going on and I feel like there aren't many people representing the, hey, let's have less violence and focus on America side of things. So it's worth coming just to say that out loud. Of course, you're hated for it. It's crazy how the people who are against killing are the criminals all of a sudden.
It's wild. And I thought the other day, you know, this is accelerating and I was hearing all this, you know, I'm going to war with Iran and I was the party was like, oh, we're not really gonna do that. After we have this election whose core point was, hey, can we just pay attention to this amazing nation that we have that's suffering and people are taking loans out to buy groceries? And, like, we need attention and money. Micropayments.
Speaker 0: They they buy now and they pay micropayments over time Food. For food.
Speaker 1: For food. But, hey, let's pay for somebody else's missile defense. No. So I I start to think I start to hear this stuff and I'm like, this can't be real. But then it's it becomes obvious to me that it is real.
And I think that is the last conversation I wanna be part of. I have zero interest in this conversation at all. I know it's all downside for me. It's like I'm gonna get, you know, rich and make more friends trying to stop
Speaker 0: But why why why why is the the the argument that you're making I'm making a slightly different argument, but it's trinity. Why are you being vilified? So maybe we just had Tom Cotton. We played clips before he got here. We had Mark Levin, Tom Cotton, we had BB.
BB said last night to Brent Baer, oh, it's twelve to thirteen months away from you know, we're supposed there was supposed the bomb was supposed to be on Friday or Saturday. Now he's telling Brent Baer on Sunday, really, we got intelligence, but it's twelve to thirteen months away, which is something they've been saying forever.
Speaker 1: Why funny that Beebe's more honest about it than than his water carriers here in The United States. Like, you would never get Barry Weiss or Tom Cotton to admit that.
Speaker 0: Well, Tom Cotton took a shot. He said the, you know
Speaker 1: He's mad at BB now. BB's No. No. No. He took a shot.
Took a He's
Speaker 2: not from Israel enough.
Speaker 0: He took a he took a shot at the same podcasters and influencers, right, or don't have the accountability, the responsibility here.
Speaker 1: You know, yes. I I really try I've spent a lot of my life being cruel and really cruel, and I'll have to answer for that someday and at times dishonesty. What do
Speaker 0: you mean cruel?
Speaker 1: Just going after those weaknesses. No. That's my instinct always. I mean, I grew up as a debater and I'm nasty in some ways. And so I look at some of the players in this whom I've known since they got to Washington, since, again, I'm from here.
I had breakfast at the Metropolitan Club this morning, alone. And, no. This is like my city. Right? My dad worked for the government.
This is where we're from. And and I look at these people who I've known since they, you know, came in from the provinces, including the senator you mentioned, who's from a state I used to live in. And, you know, you could really be mean about it, and they are mean. You know, they've attacked my family and all this stuff a lot. But I'm trying not to respond that way.
My interest is really simple. I don't want The United States enmeshed in another Middle Eastern war that doesn't serve our interest. I saw that last time. I covered that war. I had a friend killed in that war.
Speaker 0: Talk about Iraq because Iraq is saying some of the same voices at the Fox platform who was so
Speaker 1: You know, the Fox platform is just it's so disgraceful. What's you know, there's so many good people at Fox. I worked for the Murdochs for, you know, all in over twenty years. I always liked them. I like them now.
I'm not attacking them personally and tons of people at Fox are my friends. And I there's a lot about Fox that I love, and they were kind to me, always. Even when they fired me, they were nice. I just wanna say that. But the one theme that runs longitudinally through the history of Fox is the promotion of wars that don't help The United States.
And I don't know is why is that? It's the owners are committed to that vision, and, and they are elaborately polite, nice people. You know them, Rupert and Laughlin. I mean, they were sitting here. There's no chance you wouldn't like them, and they're interesting, and they're smart, and they're just nice.
They're super nice, but we disagree fundamentally on that. And the claws really come out at moments like this. You know, most of the time, it's, you know, it's fine. But when it really comes down or when it's a question of whether US military power will be exerted on behalf of a foreign country thousands of miles from here, they are all in and anyone who stands in the way will be destroyed. I don't think it's personal, by the way.
I like Tom Cotton. I always like Barry Weiss. Barry Weiss is very charming person. I like all these people. I always like Mark Levin.
Like, I got along with him. I mean, he's blowhard, sad personal life and all that, but I I was never mad at Mark Levin or Hannity. I like Brilliant
Speaker 0: brilliant constitutional guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. There there are great things about all these people. I don't think they hate me personally. They know I'm not working for Qatar. I feel like maybe I should be working for Qatar.
Like, what the hell at this point? I've never taken a dime from any foreign country or anybody, actually.
Speaker 0: In fact, you just bought out I think it was announced you bought out your investors.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Not a money guy. Mean, they're projecting. If you could see my house, like, I've made more money than I deserve, but I've not gotten rich. And I don't live like a rich person.
Everyone knows that. They're money people. That's why they're projecting or they're people with opaque motives. My motives are I'm, like, autistic about my whole life. I just I'm totally happy to tell you why I'm doing what I'm doing and I wanna be transparent and I think pretty much I am.
They're the ones who have these weird complex motives and so they project onto everyone else the same. Oh, you're getting paid by somebody. You you're not sincere. You don't really think that you're saying it in order to get clicks or it's also dumb In my case, untrue. You may dislike my views and you may have good reason to dislike my views and I understand that.
But they're totally sincere. Anyway, my temptation in a moment like this is to go low and to note that a lot of the people pushing for this stuff have really empty tormented personal lives. That's true of many in Washington. And that this is a way to kind of feel powerful. I mean, nothing makes you feel more powerful than killing other people.
That's the ultimate power. And and we talk so much about money and sex and those are drivers of human behavior. Of course, those are powerful impulses in people to accumulate more of both. But really, the ultimate power, the Promethean power, the core power is the power to kill. And when you deny that to people or you seek to deny that to people or you raise the point that actually you can't kill people and that when you do, you will suffer for that.
As you said the other day and I and I just I loved it. I meditated on it in That moment in Matthew, and it's not just in Matthew. It's in John. It's in a number of gospels where Jesus scolds Peter for raising the sword in his defense. They're they're hauling off Jesus to torture him to death for no reason.
All he did was heal people. And his closest disciples seeks to defend him with violence, and Jesus scolds him and then gets hauled off
Speaker 0: to a torturous They could have made a break. They would would have stood up, and Jesus wouldn't have been seized, and it had all gone on. But he told him right there, live by the sword. Die by
Speaker 1: the scolds him. It's unbelievable. He's mad at Peter. It's just incredible. Anyway, whether or not you believe in Christianity, whether or not you're a Christian, it doesn't matter.
It is true that people who espouse violence suffer in the end. They do. I have seen it a lot. And I grew up in a world that have espoused violence. That's what the US government does.
My dad was involved in it. And I just I just believe that. And maybe you don't believe that. That's fine. That is my core belief.
I I sincerely think that. But why the hate towards someone who's just like, hey, I I'm not I'm hard if you think and I said this to an Israeli official. If you think I'm anti Israel, man, you are you have lost the plot, son. If you think I'm your enemy, not at all. I like Israel.
Are you kidding? I've spent a lot of time there. I continue to like it. I pray that Jerusalem is not damaged. I feel so sad for the Israelis who've been killed in the last couple days and the Iranians who've been killed in the last couple days with nothing to do with any of this.
But the point is, if you think that saying, hey, let's focus focus on my country where I was born, where my family's been for hundreds of years, that was the promise of the last election, please do it. If you think that's hate, you know, you've really lost perspective, I guess is what I would say. But they do think it's hate and I've and what's happened is what I knew it happened, which is just like, oh, attacks I don't wanna deal with that are affecting personal friendships that I care about. The viciousness and the dishonesty is almost unbelievable. Anyway, not to whine.
I never whine about stuff like that. It's just that I knew this was gonna happen. I didn't wanna talk about it at all. I'd much rather talk about immigration. I'd much rather talk about keeping the dollar stores out of rural America.
There are all kind I'd much rather talk about people taking out loans to buy groceries. These are the declining life expectancy in this country. Fentanyl? I mean, someone else I know just died of fentanyl last week. It's like all of that is now ignored because a leader of a country who does not have majority support in that country, probably 30% support, wants a course of action that includes The United States.
And I just disagree. And, anyway, I think it's gonna happen. I don't know, here's what I
Speaker 0: You you think that do you think we're enjoying the combat offensive combat opera? Well, we have to we have to we can't assume that we have
Speaker 1: to stop the product of, like, look
Speaker 0: We have to stop that.
Speaker 1: You've actually helped run the governments. I don't need to tell you. You've been there. Decisions like this are never explicitly made. They just sort of happen.
Yes. Sort of like living with your girlfriend. Like, you you, you know, you wake up hungover one morning and she's there, and then she just kind of doesn't leave. And then next thing you know, you get married and have kids. Like, that's how most people make decisions, just sort of on the basis of facts on the ground.
And these things move inexorably toward what they're moving to now, which is full scale war that includes lots of other countries, either explicitly or not, but the effect is the same. It's a world war. It's a war in which the world is participating.
Speaker 0: Well, we're we're I think we're in the kinetic part from Ukraine, but today, they just moved the carrier battle group from the South China Sea. The Nimitz is heading toward the North Arabian Sea. So they're they're they're they've got the the the tankers have flown over there. So we're prepositioning the assets Of course. To get involved.
And you think that this is gonna happen. There's no way we can stop it.
Speaker 1: It's too I mean, I think there are ways to stop it. Oh, you are such a nice person. Sorry. I needed the sacred beverage. No.
Of course, there are ways to stop it. It's just that unless you take it's like gaining weight, which I have, you know, lived with. It's like unless you are a crazy person devoted to being thin, you will get fatter in your fifties. Like, you have to take active steps to prevent the inevitable, something that is inevitable otherwise. And in this case, what's inevitable absent those active monomaniacal steps toward preventing it is is a is a much larger war.
It's too easy to pull The United States into. Have too many assets in that region. We're too dependent on the energy from that region. International oil markets are mean, there's so many things that could go wrong, actually. It's horrifying as the the exchange between Israel and Iran has been.
Horrifying in the sense that innocents have died, which, let me remind you, is horrifying always and everywhere.
Speaker 0: No. Have to believe that. Tehran's got hit. Civilians are dead.
Speaker 1: In both places. Right. And if we don't think that that's sad, then we're not fully human. Like, you have to believe that's sad and you have to really mean it. Whether or not, you know, you can hate the Iranian government.
I'm not for the Iranian government. But if you don't see the death of innocence anywhere is sad, then you are gravely diminished, certainly as a Christian. Hey, whatever. But there are so many ways to pull The United States into this, and the incentives to pull The US in are so profound. I guess, if I could just say one political thing, the watching Donald Trump, who, of course, you know very well, who I think at core is sincere about peace.
Oh, big time. Yeah. Big time. Yeah. Big time.
I mean, that's that's real. Watching him done so wrong, the lies, oh, he knew all along, you know, that the peace process was fake. Steve Witkoff was playing along. That is a lie. That's a lie.
I know. That's a lie. Those guys meant it.
Speaker 0: Bald faced lie.
Speaker 1: It's a total lie. And all these people that that Mark Levin and and all of the minions who are running cover for a foreign government, they're all telling that same lie. And I just I feel for president Trump, and I think I don't know this. I'm just guessing. But at this point, I feel like he just has to kinda roll with it.
You know, what do you say? You can't you don't wanna get in an argument about that right in the middle of a war.
Speaker 0: No. I think he reiterated last night that we gotta get back to the peace part. They gotta lay down the
Speaker 1: lying about him. He sincerely even now, he sincerely believes whether he's right or or not, I I can't say. But that this could be a predicate to a peace deal, what we're seeing now. He really thinks that and wants that, and the and the other side is just like, no. We a peace deal is the world.
Speaker 0: It's the other side, but the other side also has app the apparatus here. This is
Speaker 1: what happened in The US.
Speaker 0: When Ukraine attacked when Ukraine attacked, we still haven't asked Ratcliffe. Was the CIA involved? That is zero probability Ukraine could attack that deep into Russia Exactly. With without without some involvement. Here, the exact same thing.
Why was Tulsi Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting all day? You know why? Why Tulsi Gabbard still to the American public is is has said the last public statement is that the the program was not back up and running. And now we have from from Beebe by himself on Fox by Brent Bear that the thing was twelve to thirteen months away. It wasn't this weekend.
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 0: And this is by his own thing. And we also know that it was a decapitation. As we said on Friday, it wasn't just about the nuclear program. It's a decapitation of total leadership. So this is a total regime change, which, by the way, you may have a plan for regime change is fine, but you gotta bring the American people on.
Let me go back.
Speaker 1: I by the way, I said that publicly last week. This is the point of this is regime change. I know everyone involved. I know I'm I'm telling the truth. I have no weird motive here at all.
I don't need Israel. Let's have a rational conversation about what our aims are here, and maybe you can convince me that we need to support a regime change war in Iran. Tell me how that plays out in a country of 90,000,000 people. Have you thought it through? Do you even care?
And the answer is no. We have a economic and political and demographic crisis in Europe because of US backed, Israel backed
Speaker 0: Syria.
Speaker 1: Wars Yes. In The Middle East. That's what's destroyed Europe where my ancestors came from. And I I spend a lot of time there, and I love European culture, which is Christian culture. And it's destroyed that.
And, you know, shut up. You're not allowed to care. Who's making the rules here? You know, I I don't hate anyone. I don't see conflict with anyone at all.
I have no weird biases. All my biases are out in the open. And but I I I really resent being told who my enemy especially with foreigners. Some foreigner shows up and tells you who your enemies are? Really?
I've been here a long time. I live across from my parents' graves. You can't tell me who America's enemies are. At least I have a right to weigh in on that also. Oh, shut up, says Mark Dubowitz or something.
It's like, you are you even
Speaker 2: from here? What do you who are you anyway? This is so bonkers.
Speaker 1: I don't hate Mark Dubowitz. I don't hate his agenda. What I hate I disagree with his agenda. I'm not mad at him. I'm not mad at any of these people fundamentally.
But what I seek is an honest, open, transparent conversation about what we're doing and why. And I don't think that's too much to ask for considering it's my tax dollars and my money that you're seeking to use to achieve it. If that's radical, then, you know, we've distorted the terms beyond recognition.
Speaker 0: If you look at the debt, $9,000,000,000,000 associated with Iraq and Afghanistan. I wanna go back to Iraq. We played on Friday. We did the whole opening thing of the bombing, everything going everybody on TV beating their chest because at that time, it looked like Israel was telling, hey. This thing's over now.
People jumping in. And we finished with shock and awe from February. And I said, hey. Look. If you go back in that time, they're all beating their chest then in the march up country to Baghdad, and they couldn't be better.
Remember, they're throwing roses on the ground, all that. And it was twenty years later, a complete fiasco because it's always a law unintended consequences. That's what we face here. This thing has not been thought through. Right?
It does not have the commitment of the American. We have to bring the American people. The American people are not there to get into another war right
Speaker 1: now. And why is the congress not actively debating this? There's one person. Marjorie Taylor Greene is, like, the only oh, and now Levin says this morning, she's not MAGA. Okay.
Alright now. Now we're really in the last scene of Animal Farm.
Speaker 0: No. She she's just she's just some tiny congressman from rural Georgia.
Speaker 1: She's some liberal from Suburban Atlanta. I mean, it's also mind bending. And I have to say, you know, the the level of unanimity, the sort of instantaneous response from 535 members of congress that we're gonna do this one thing, No debate. Anyone who says otherwise is evil. It does make you wonder, like, what is this system?
Are you an appeaser?
Speaker 0: You've been called now an appeaser? An appeaser? What? And a pacifist.
Speaker 1: Right? A pacifist.
Speaker 0: Why why why have they thrown what have both Well, they're literally a fact
Speaker 1: that my family
Speaker 0: What have you said here in the last seventy two hours as a factual matter that would make you an appeaser
Speaker 1: and make you American above all. I am not a genius. I'm not a prophet. I've been wrong many many times, and I it's possible I'm wrong now, but my motives are transparent. I love this country.
Have nowhere else to go. I don't I will not go anywhere else, and I just want what's best for it. We can debate what's best for it. But to tell me that I'm working for a foreign nation is like by people who are literally working for foreign nations, it's like so nuts. I will say this.
Our political system is paralyzed in the face of this completely. It's not doing what it was designed to do, which is channel the views of the people through the apparatus of government. It's not doing that at all. It's short circuiting and ignoring their opinions. And you have to kind of wonder why, and I don't fully understand it.
I know that our system is not working, and I don't think there's any country in the planet looking at us saying, oh, I want that system. Oh, wow. That version of democracy, I think What if
Speaker 0: look at Trump as that trade deals to bring jobs back, seal the border, and deport the illegal aliens, and no more forever wars as the basic planks in November of last year that won Yes. I wanna speak with back. It it is at least working at that level that the message can get out, and we have a new coalition. We have African American men, Hispanics, families, know, Star County, Texas, the the most Hispanic county in the country, 97% hard bitten, blue collar Hispanic citizens. We lose by to Hillary by 60 points.
Trump wins in November by 16 points. It's coming our way in this new coalition. Incredible. Including even the summit, and I get limited appetite from even the tech bros in that crowd. It's a new coalition like 1932, right, where FDR had professors at Harvard and cracker democrats down down South and ranchers out West and and people in inner cities and Irish and Italians and all that.
A new coalition that could govern for
Speaker 1: fifty years.
Speaker 0: One one one. But it's something that could govern for fifty years. That's out. Now we're into the governing of it where those are the priorities. And particularly, president Trump has now tripled down with the ice raids and saying, hey.
These sanctuary cities are gonna go. We're gonna get these people out of here. That to me is the top battle in this third world war. That we've had 10,000,000 illegal aliens just on Biden's watch. Is it not able to go able to win elections, but not able to govern?
Is that the issue?
Speaker 1: You know, I really don't know. I I there's something really wrong. There are certain red lines that you can't cross, and and they're almost all foreign policy related. I do think that, you know, the people pushing hardest for American involvement in a war with Iran really hate Trump's domestic agenda. Mark Levin was a never Trumper in 02/2016, of course.
They all do, the Bill Crystals. They all hate what Trump is trying to do in The United States.
Speaker 0: Which is populist economics. Yeah.
Speaker 1: They hate it. They hate it. That's exactly right. Look. We'll see this in the tax bill.
For Trump with Trump. I I I gave up this sounds so whiny, but, like, grouse season, which is my favorite time of year in in October and left my dogs at home suffering. Like, where are you? And I went on the road with Trump, and I loved it. And I was with him.
I was standing right next to him when he won. I have a picture of phone of that, which I would never show anybody else, but I look at it because it was one of my happiest moments. It was the happiest moment in politics and I've seen a lot that I've ever participated in. And look, of course, governing's really hard and you're never gonna do everything you promised you would do, but on the big things, it's really important that they not get totally subverted because it makes people lose faith in the system. And I do think
Speaker 0: But the systems run this is the deep state part of it.
Speaker 1: What is the system?
Speaker 0: We we barely have a grip. We have two good guys. Cash Patel is like a brother to me and Dan Bungino, great guy. We have two people at FBI. We barely have a grip there.
We have a handful of people at justice. We barely have a grip there. We have two people at Ellis and and Radcliffe at CIA. Right? We have a handful of people with with Tulsi.
On the security, we have Christie and and Corey and a couple other people, you know, the home and at DHS, but DHS is still getting people out here the old fashioned way. That's where they're burning through cash. In these central apparatuses of the deep state, we barely have a grip on it, and they're running the deal.
Speaker 1: The Kennedy files out sixty two years later. And by the way, somebody murdered the president of The United States and lied about it for sixty years. Okay? And we still can't get those files. There we there are thousands of documents that have not been released as of today.
And everyone seems
Speaker 0: to All of it related all of it related to somehow CIA activity or CIA suppressing information with the FDA.
Speaker 1: Just CIA. Okay? So until look. We're living in a post coup country. The coup from the Everything that happened After that.
Post 1963. Every elected official, certainly every official elected at the national level lives with that hanging over him. They took out this guy, and whoever did it is so powerful that we can't even know today when John McCone is fifty years in the grave, head of CIA then. Everyone's gone, and we still can't find out exactly what happened today.
Speaker 0: Sources and methods.
Speaker 1: They don't even say that anymore. They don't say anything. They're just like, we released y'all. No. You didn't.
You lie. You lie. I know. I'm from here. I, you know, I I know.
So I do think there's a sense in which some of our leaders feel the presence of a physical threat.
Speaker 0: I don't think that I know it. So Well, to when Trump is a two assassination attempts.
Speaker 1: Well, at least two. And you can't have Not
Speaker 0: from Iran. Two that were Not from Iran and for For BBSA's got two.
Speaker 1: It's That's that's reaching. I mean, I do think that Netanyahu could make his case by telling the truth. I don't think there's any reason to lie. Again, that's a lie. He knows that Iran and then he Brett Bear pressed him and he's like, oh, it's your proxies anyway.
But the but the point is the point is you know, as a high school debater,
Speaker 0: I know how this works.
Speaker 2: Pivot. But the point is over here, it's it's
Speaker 1: a three card money. It's the gypsies. You know? Okay. No.
Iran did not try to assassinate the president during the last election. And by the way, if Iran did try to assassinate Trump and we know that, then why are we not at war with Iran? What are you saying, Bibi? Are you saying that the president of The United States is such a cuck that a foreign country can try and murder him and he won't do anything about it? Is that what you're saying?
I mean, if if the administration believed Iran was behind two assassination attempts against Donald Trump, trust me, We nuked the country. You can't do your own murder an American president. So, we that's not true and everyone knows it's not true. But what is true is that the American president was murdered and we're still not allowed to know who did it and why. And I just think until that is cleared and I've never been a Kennedy obsessive or whatever, not interested in the Kennedys especially.
I'm not I'm not Irish. But as a matter of like governance, how can you have a president or a senator who truly does his best to uphold the core idea of a democratic republic, which is like the people's opinions matter? You can't have that because he's worried about getting killed. That's just true. And nobody says that.
I don't know why don't they say that. Oh, you know. If this were happening in Liberia, you'd be like, it's not a real government because whenever the president try and, you know, strays outside the pre prescribed boundaries, he gets murdered or worries about getting murdered. Pretty much the same thing. You would not describe that as a functioning democracy.
And yet, we just pretend that this is not happening, but it is happening. And, boy, do you see it on foreign policy? It's the only issue they care about. You really think that ended Mark Levin, like, cares how many Somalis are in Minnesota? No.
Not at all. The more the better. What he all he cares about is the projection of force using American service personnel to fight faraway wars that have no material benefit, in fact, massive downside for The United States. That's his whole orientation.
Speaker 0: But why is that the platform of Fox, though? It's just not Mark. So but why is Fox, like, all weekend, it's just cheerly it's the same it's exact you can play side by side Iraq in 2003 Oh, I was there. In here. And and what's happening today?
Why is it that why is this apparatus?
Speaker 1: Well, Levin's the funniest because he's terrible on TV. And, again, I never had any problems with him at Fox. He kinda controls Hannity in this weird way. I never understood what that was about. I never really cared to learn.
Sean was great to me, always nice, and so was Levin. So I just, like, kinda stayed away. But they didn't wanna put him on TV because he's, like, screechy and he's just not a coming president. Michael on TV. Like, oh my unless you're literally floating in and out of consciousness and the attendant has taken the remote to go have a cigarette, you're gonna flip the channel when my Michael Levin gets on TV.
It's like listening to your ex wife screaming about alimony payments. It's like not appealing. So they wouldn't put him on TV and then, you know, Sean pushed and they gave him some kind of weekend show that nobody watched. Now, I don't have a TV, but someone was just who had who owns a TV was just telling me that he's, like, all over prime time. So what is that?
That's not by popular acclaim. It's not like their viewer surveys. Like, you know, we need a lot more Mark Levin. Less Jesse Waters, more Mark Levin. Mark Levin.
Speaker 2: What they're doing is what
Speaker 1: they always do, which is just turning up the propaganda hose to full blast and just trying to, you know, knock elderly Fox viewers off their feet and make them submit
Speaker 0: This is this is where the this is where the population, the voters are ahead of the political class in the media. The American people do not want any more engagement in a foreign war. They just they saw Iraq. They saw Afghanistan. We're just out.
I think twenty
Speaker 1: years racist. I think is that what you're saying? They're just bigots.
Speaker 0: So so so why is why is Fox continue to pound that?
Speaker 1: Because they really really mean it. And you saw they really mean it. I mean, there is a kind of sincerity there that I respect. It's I I don't know why they fired me, but I think it no one ever told me. And I just wanna say for the fifth time, they could not have been nicer when they fired me, and they couldn't have been, you know, more friendly.
I I talked to them recently to the owners recently because I still like them even though we disagree. So I'm not whining about them as people, but I think they can me from Fox or shut down my show because I criticized Zelensky and Zelensky's close to the owners of the company. It's like, well, how did that happen? Why is Zelensky I don't know. I don't understand.
There's a lot I don't understand. All I know is and it's not just Fox News. It's the American media generally. It's it's government institutions. It's this city.
It's the people I used to live next to on Cambridge Road Northwest in DC. They are deadly serious on the subject of projection of force abroad. That is the one they have no sense of hearing about at all. They'll lecture you all day about the gays and the black people and, you know, in this house, we believe in science. They don't give a shit about science or black people or gays or transgender.
What they care about is the projection of force against their enemies on the other side of the globe. That's why the Pentagon has a trillion dollar budget when the country is protected by the Atlantic and the Pacific.
Speaker 0: And and president Trump's strategy is a hemisphere defense. What then are the steps that you're recommending if the if the program is we must take down the deep state or at least make some effort at at it? What would be your recommendation to the
Speaker 1: process? Under control.
Speaker 0: And how would you do that?
Speaker 1: By adding the number of political appointees. You know, I think CIA has know, it's a federal agency whose budget we don't know, of course. And it's not just a federal agency.
Speaker 0: And I say this in all Syrians. The the special government employee where you still had your podcast, you still had your the Tucker Carlson network, would you go assist the president like Elon did with Doge? Would you go assist him to say, hey. Give me a hundred and twenty days. I will give you advice.
CIA? No. I've the whole thing. CIA, Pentagon, DIA, the the DNI, all of it, FBI, DOJ to say, hey. Look.
Here's the battle map. Here's what we have to do, or we're not gonna have we don't really have a constitution republic.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm unable to organize a sock drawer, so I don't think that I have the temperament. I don't think I have the skills for that. I'm doing Do you
Speaker 0: have the insight to do that if you had other people who can organize it?
Speaker 1: Grew up around it. Yeah. I know.
Speaker 0: I know a lot about it. And I think this has to happen. And I'm being some very serious.
Speaker 1: Killed immediately, of course.
Speaker 0: I mean, you think you would be subject to assassination?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I think I I think that would be perilous. I would do it. I would do look. I feel like what I'm doing now, I love Trump, and I mean that.
I've never Does Trump frustrate you? Of course. I mean, you've you've certainly been through that. But my dog's frustrated. My kid's frustrated.
I mean, you get frustrated when you deal with people you love. But I'm my core feeling about Trump, I think it's obvious in the way I talk about him, and I didn't I don't I don't need any more money. I don't need anything from anybody. If I didn't like Trump, I'd just say so. I actually really love Trump.
I think he's a deeply humane, kind person. And I am saying this because I I'm really afraid that my country's gonna be further weakened by this. I think we're gonna see the end of American empire, obviously. Other nations would like to see that, and this is a perfect way to scuttle the USS America on the shoals of Iran. But it's also going to end, I believe, Trump's presidency and effectively end it.
And and so that's why I'm saying this.
Speaker 0: What do you mean by that? That's that's coming from you.
Speaker 1: That's You get look, I knew Bush. I knew George w Bush. We family connections to Bush. I knew Bush. Personally, I still see Bush sometimes.
And, know, of course, he he hates me and he does because I criticized him on Iraq. And that war is the sum total from historical perspective of his administration. But I knew him and he had all kinds of plans for the things that he wanted to do. But once Domestically. Domestically.
Right. To improve the country. Right. And you may agree or disagree, but like in his mind, he wasn't just about the invasion of Iraq in March of
Speaker 0: twenty He was gonna redo Social Security. He had all his 100%. Aug types of he was gonna take care of the entitlements issue.
Speaker 1: And he really thought it was gonna work. Yep. And you could laugh at that or whatever, but the point is the second you get enmeshed in a real war, not a fake, let's go bomb the villagers and declare success, though we don't even have a good track record. Like, why are the Houthis still there? I mean, there's a whole other question, which is how prepared is the US military for real conflict?
And the answer is totally unprepared. Scary unprepared. I don't think people understand that. But anyway, the only reason I'm saying any of this is because I really, really care. And it's been what a disaster for me personally.
I mean, it's like the last thing I wake up, you know, there are all these texts going, well, I can't believe you're so evil. You hate this and that. I I just wanna restate. I don't hate anybody. And to the extent I do hate people, I try to repent of it.
I don't want to hate anybody. I really don't. I just don't want my country to be further weakened or destroyed by another one of these wars. And, boy, if you can't connect the dots after twenty five years of this shit, you're either too dumb to participate in the conversation or you're, like Mark Levin, just a liar who doesn't care.
Speaker 0: I know you gotta bounce. We're gonna hang up this afternoon. One question. If you were able to see the president in the next couple days when he gets back, what would be the two or three things you would tell him? Mister president, this is my this is my heartfelt advice about where we are right now for
Speaker 1: the country. Because I think I try to speak exactly the same well, you know me. I speak exactly the same in private. I use the f word more. But in in general, I say the same things.
And I would say to him, like, you're the only person who can bring peace. You should continue to try and do that. It's difficult. It takes a long time, but your timetable is the only timetable that matters. Don't get bum rushed.
You don't need to fix this because there's political turmoil in Bibi's coalition. Right. It's not relevant
Speaker 0: to the military. He's at 30% approval is not your problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just because some ultra orthodox party doesn't wanna be conscripted or whatever's going on in Israel, these are long time problems that that country has had. That's not relevant to our plans or to your plans as the leader of the free world. Okay? A.
B, if you get involved in a war that includes American troops and force, if you're lobbying missiles from submarines into Iran
Speaker 0: Or combat sorties. You're doing combat sorties. You're I actually say we're combatant now, but, I mean, you could basically argue maybe not what the air
Speaker 1: defense I just wanna pretend we're not.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Because Yes. Of course, we are. And but I wanna pretend we're not because we're in the final stages of being able to pull back, and pretty soon, there's no pulling back. You know, we're still sending money to Ukraine to fight Vladimir Putin. Like, how did that happen?
It happened because nobody just stopped it. Nobody said, hey, Zelensky. You're not even elected. You're a dictator. Off the stage.
Run to Switzerland. You know? Get out of
Speaker 0: The intelligence services are helping from to plan the 3,000 mile strike into their strategic assets in the country.
Speaker 1: The US services are also fully aware of the many assassinations and assassination attempts against opponents and critics of the Ukrainian regime. Many, including someone I know. So, The U this is super dark, man. The more you know about it, it's like The U The US the IC, American Intel community, is aware that the Ukrainian Intel community is murdering people, including Americans? Like, how can that even happen?
So there's a lot. But the last thing I'll say is the second I've seen it. The second the killing starts, the calculations change. People become much less principled, much less reasonable, much less able to
Speaker 0: see Vengeance and annihilation. And they can't
Speaker 1: see their own interest clearly, and so don't don't go there.
Speaker 0: And you think right now we're on the cusp of that?
Speaker 1: I'm an optimistic man, and I think that we could I think we could pull back. And I I wish the president wasn't in Canada. I don't wish a trip to Canada on anyone because I think it's a really dark country. I hope he gets home soon because you don't want any of that Canadian to rub off on you while you're there. But, yeah, I mean, I think that this can be can be stopped, but it it it's gonna require a really tough step, which is to say to our client state, we love you.
We wanna help you. We don't think you're acting in your own interest, but, you know, we could debate that. But what we're not gonna do is imperil American national security or the American economy or America itself on your behalf. We're not gonna do that because that's that's immoral for us to do that. Our population doesn't want it and we're saying this with love, but no.
No. As you would say to a child. I mean, you've got a bunch of kids, you say no to them? Of course, do because you love them. It's okay to do that and and, you know, there are proxies in The United States and Barry and that Levin character will jump.
You hate them. Don't hate them at all. I like them. This is crazy. What's the endgame here?
The endgame, of course, is to topple the regime and just have this 90,000,000 person civil war and further destroy Europe and the world. You know, it's like, we're not doing that again. We've already been through this. We're not doing that again. And this is big boy stuff.
This is not Gaza. And I, you know, I never say anything about Gaza because I really try. I'm very offended by it. They blow up a church in Gaza with my money. I'm a Christian.
Like, no. How about no? I said one thing about that, man. I've never heard the end of it. But I've tried to stay away from Gaza, but now we're talking about a huge country.
We're talking about Southwest Asia, one of the biggest energy And and
Speaker 0: and civilization.
Speaker 1: This is not Also, since you're not gonna convince me that the Iranians I don't like I'm not a Shiite. I'm not, like, on the side of the Shiite clerics. I'm a freaking Episcopalian. Settle down. However, you're not gonna convince me that the Iranian people are my enemy.
Again, we're going down this here. Here's who you're required to hate. It's it's Orwell, man. You're not I'm a free man. You're not telling me who I have to hate.
I'll decide who I'd like and don't like on the basis of my values and what I believe my interests are. They spent, you know, five years telling me, Vladimir Putin is your enemy. No. He's not. I'm not mad at Vladimir Putin.
Tell me why I should be. I'm mad at you. You know what I mean? I'm just like whatever. It's all so fake.
I'm not playing along.
Speaker 0: And here, you're gonna be doing interviews to take this actually take it up a couple of notches.
Speaker 1: I really just wanna get away from this topic because it's one of those topics that intersects with a lot of other things. So it's not like Belgium is getting frisky with Liechtenstein and, like, I have an opinion on that. This is a country that's the, you know, the very center of the three biggest religions in the world that is, you know, a Jewish state. So whatever that means exactly. And so it it has an emotional resonance for Jewish people in America, some of whom are my close friends, that is different from any other country.
It's not like, you know, when things happen in Sweden or The UK where my ancestors are from, people aren't quite as emotional. It's very emotional. So, I don't want anything to do with it at all. I don't wanna criticize. Bibi, I don't wanna talk about Gaza.
I don't want look. I feel completely backed into a corner here where it's like we are on the cusp of entering a war on behalf of a political leader in a faraway country that's going to really hurt my country. I've got four kids. I wanna have grandkids. Like, are you even joking?
Stop. And I tried to be, like, quiet about it. I don't I don't wanna get involved in any of this because, again, people are so emotional. How could you I mean, you should see my text this morning. I got threatened by someone this morning, actually, who I
Speaker 0: Threatened as by a friend, a colleague, or somebody that just came and said you're it's too much.
Speaker 1: It's very careless what you said. It's very careless. Careless. I was like, hey, asshole. I know what you're saying.
I got it. Very careless. Anyway, whatever. I don't wanna get I'm not whining. I'm not AOC.
Oh, I'm under such threat. I'm not under threat. I'm but what I'm saying is I don't want to be involved in this at all, and I think most Americans don't. And it's only because We're actually getting drawn into a war. A tiny and by a tiny minority of people, like, know a million people who are pro Israel and Jewish or pro Israel and not Jewish like me.
I've always been pro Israel. Who are like, I don't think this is good. It doesn't like, why do we allow 3% of the participant or the participants in this conversation to define the terms? You know, if you are okay with any, you know, Iranian enrichment at all, you're for the Ayatollahs and you're against Israel. Shut up.
No. I'm not gonna allow you to define the terms. You're a total liar. I mean, these are liars, like, real will say anything. I'm working for Qatar.
Trump was actually pretending to go through a peace process and
Speaker 0: No. That thing was terrible.
Speaker 1: And Steve Witkoff was, like, who I know very well, who's one of the most pure hearted people, whether you agree with him or not. If you're calling into question Steve Witkoff's motives, like, Witkoff doesn't need any of this. He's just doing it because he wants to help. That's it. That's the only he's paying for himself.
And if you're telling me that Steve Witkoff is working for Qatar, that's what set me over the edge because I know Witkoff well and I really love Steve Witkoff and I think he's I agree with him on everything, but I think he's like a decent man who wants what's best for Donald Trump, his best friend, and The United States. And that's enough for me. Like, I see his motive as pure. It is pure. I know him well.
And when they're calling him an anti Semi, it's like so nuts. That's when I was like, ugh, I can't believe I have to get involved in this, but because it's too much. It's just too much. You can't let that go unresponded to you. You have to stand up and say, I'm sorry.
That's just not true. That's a lie and you know it's a lie.
Speaker 0: But you're not gonna back down from this. You're gonna you're gonna I
Speaker 1: wanna back down immediately. I just wanna get away from this. I wanna go back. You know, I'm missing a lot of my favorite things and a lot of my favorite people. I don't wanna argue about Israel of all subjects.
Oh my gosh. And I don't wanna become I'm not gonna become a crazy person or a hater. Part of the dynamic here is you become the things they accuse you of being. Like, I've seen this happen to many people, not many, but I have seen it happen, where they say, you love Putin. That to me for years now.
And then one day you're like, fuck it. I love Putin. Okay. I I just mean, I actually I kind of I think Putin's, like, an amazing leader. I'm not I've always thought that, but I'm not, like, a close friend of Putin's.
They can drive you to become a worse version of yourself by accusing you of being it. You sort of grow into the attack. And there's no chance I'm not letting that happen to myself. There's just no chance. I'm not gonna become a hater.
I'm not gonna become obsessed with Israel. I just wanna get away from the topic. Lot of other things going on. Just stop trying to drag my country into war. That's it.
Speaker 0: Tucker Carlson, thank you so much for coming by. Good
Speaker 1: to see you.
Speaker 0: I'm just in the neighborhood. Drop by. Tucker and I will be hanging out this afternoon. I guess we'll meet
Speaker 1: I can't wait. I'm gonna ask you lots of hard questions.
Speaker 0: Lots of hard questions. Hopefully, I have some answers. Let's take a short commercial break. We got a rolling break. Let's go and take a short commercial break.
Tucker, thank you for coming by.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Oh my gosh. I love it.
Speaker 0: We'll see you here this afternoon. Thank you for remember the old days? The the right party at all. Like, at
Speaker 1: all.
Speaker 0: It's still very gonzo.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
.@potus on Tucker Carlson's comments: "Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen." https://t.co/fNqOAMLRYl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 stated he doesn't know what Tucker Carlson is saying about him being complicit in the war, and that Carlson should get a television network to say it so people will listen. Speaker 0 then asked if Speaker 1 had spoken to Zelensky before the bylaws.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does he respond to Tucker Carlson criticizing you, saying that you're complicit in the war?
Speaker 1: I I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so the people listen.
Speaker 0: And quickly, have you spoken to Zelensky before your bylaws?
reSee.it AI Summary
Officials with ActBlue have withdrawn their offer to testify before Congress. I believe the potential for criminal or civil liability from the Trump DOJ has made them increasingly nervous, as discussed by @jsolomonReports on @stinchfield1776 regarding ActBlue's fraudulent actions.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
BREAKING NEWS: OFFICIALS WITH ACTBLUE HAVE RESCINDED THEIR OFFER TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS “I think now the possibility that criminal or civil liability could be attached to this from the Trump DOJ has made all these ActBlue folks a lot more nervous…” -@jsolomonReports joins @stinchfield1776 to discuss the latest they’ve uncovered from ActBlue’s fraudulent actions.
Video Transcript AI Summary
ActBlue officials are reportedly hesitant to testify, possibly due to concerns about potential criminal liability as the Justice Department investigates. Trump issued an executive order directing the Justice Department and FBI to treat foreign money in elections seriously, viewing it as foreign interference.
Congress, led by Jim Jordan, James Comer, and Brian Style, is investigating ActBlue, noting the platform reduced its security provisions, such as dropping the CVV requirement, during the 2024 election. Congress suggests this may have facilitated fraudulent money flow, potentially to help Democrats defeat Donald Trump.
ActBlue claims to want to cooperate and denies intentional involvement. However, a New York Times article quoted ActBlue officials expressing concern about what Congress might uncover. Suspicious activity reports indicate potential money laundering, raising concerns from the Treasury Department, Congress, Trump, and the Justice Department.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Grant. Good to be with you.
Speaker 1: Alright. You have been instrumental in breaking news on this ActBlue. You've been following this for months, probably over a year. Do you make of this officials now saying they won't testify?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Listen. There's clearly some concern among their lawyers that now that the justice department is looking at the possibility of criminality here that going before congress could increase their risk. And I think that that executive order that president Trump issued back in April was a very consequential moment. Donald Trump is taking this seriously.
He told his justice department and FBI, you take this seriously because foreign money coming into our elections is a foreign interference in our elections. And so ACT Blue, I think, was gonna come in and so we'll get we'll do our show and get out of here. And then they realize, hey. We may have some criminal liability. Now what are what's being looked at?
What makes ACT Blue? What makes Congress concerned? We now know from the great work that Jim Jordan, James Comer, and, Brian Style did, the three chairman that have sort of created a super investigation in Congress, that ActBlue, had reduced its security provisions. So we all live in an era of higher cyber criminals. Right?
We're we're more trying to protect ourselves more every day. We have double authentication. We use the CVV number on the back of our credit card. Well, ActBlue was doing the opposite during the twenty twenty four election. They were not requiring the CVV number.
They were not they actually dropped some of the other security provisions they had. And then all of a sudden, to the surprise of no one who would understand the system, there were fraudulent monies moving through according to congress. This is what congress has now said in its first official report on this. That decision to lower the barrier, to lower the security makes everybody suspicious that maybe ActBlue was part of some effort to get dirty money into the election to help Democrats try to defeat Donald Trump because there's no other explanation for it. If you were trying to take good care of your consumers, your donors, you would make sure they had the best security and ActBlue was doing the opposite.
So I think now the possibility that criminal or civil liability could be attached to this from the Trump Justice department has made all of these ActBlue folks a lot more nervous a lot quicker.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Have they said anything to you guys, just the just the news when you try to contact them? Has there been any comment from them?
Speaker 0: They have. Listen. They say, listen. We understand the concerns. We wanna do the right thing.
We wanna cooperate, and we don't think that, we were intentionally involved in anything. Now, they said that, then the New York Times came out and had an article with a lot of their officials saying, oh, this place was a mess and we're really concerned what Congress is gonna find out. So the New York Times kind of actually undercut, ACT Blue's message with the story about a month ago that kind of followed up on all our reporting going back to last summer. We know there are serious concerns. We know there is some foreign money that came through from the early suspicious activity reports that Congress has looked at.
They haven't seen them all yet. That's a very important fact. They're beginning to look at them. The Trump administration digging them up, but it is very rare to see a political donation site be the focal point of suspicious activity reports, are essentially money laundering reports. So the Treasury Department had concerns.
The Congress has concerns. Donald Trump has concerns. The Justice Department has concerns. That's probably why the lawyers and these witnesses now have concerns. They may be facing some serious liability issues.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's been great work watching you lay this stuff out over the last few months and year, actually. So we appreciate you. I know you jumped in on short notice to bring us this job. As always Yeah.
Great having you on, my friend. Thank you as always.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the last 24 hours, federal judges have ordered the Trump administration to bring back an illegal alien from El Salvador, restore funds to schools practicing DEI and sanctuary cities, and drop the mandate for proof of citizenship for voter registration.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
IN THE LAST 24-HOURS FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE ORDERED THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO: 1. BRING BACK ANOTHER ILLEGAL ALIEN FROM EL SALVADOR 2. RESTORE FUNDS TO SCHOOLS PRACTICING DEI AND SANCTUARY CITIES 3. DROP A MANDATE FOR PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP FOR VOTER REGISTRATION @rickdelgadorad @lfs6b @KDJRadioShow @damonroberts
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the last 24 hours, federal judges have ordered the Trump administration to bring back an illegal alien from El Salvador, restore funds to schools practicing DEI, restore funds to sanctuary cities, and drop the proof of citizenship mandate for voter registration. One speaker suggests Democrats are using the courts because they lost the presidential election, including the popular vote. They claim Democrats' "last attempt before they go to full on violence is let's try and do it in the courts." They also allege that "swampy Republicans" and "rhinos" are complicit because they benefit from the current system. They believe these individuals want to maintain the status quo and control everything, using judges to obstruct changes. They state that the only democracy under attack is their bureaucracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And since we've seen you last, in the last twenty four hours, we have federal judges that have ordered the Trump administration to, number one, bring back another illegal alien that they say should not have been deported from El Salvador, by the way. Restore funds to schools practicing DEI. So forget DEI going to DIE. The federal judges are saying, oh, no. No.
No. No. No. Maybe we're not done with DEI. Restore the funds.
We have another one who said restore the funds to sanctuary cities, and we had a drop a proof of citizenship mandate for voter registration. All from federal district court judges in this country. Yes, in this country. Not from El Salvador, who you would think they maybe are from. In the way they are are ruling.
No. From this country, actually. Bring back another illegal alien from El Salvador. Restore funds to schools practicing DEI. Restore funds to sanctuary cities, and drop the proof of citizenship mandate for voter registration.
That's what's happened in the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: Good stuff.
Speaker 0: And I and I ask again, we had a we had a presidential election for what reason?
Speaker 1: So the judges could take over the presidency.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly.
Speaker 1: Because Democrats are are so butt hurt that they lost and they lost badly. And not only did they lose via the of course the popular vote which really really really scrambled their brains, but of course again they lost, you know, the way all election presidential elections are are mapped out, and it's it's the at the what the hell is the name of the thing? I forgot now. The college. What is it?
Speaker 0: Is it Columbia?
Speaker 1: No. Not you know, how how do you elect the president of The United States? I forgot the term. Electoral College. Electoral College.
Yes. Not only did they lose the electoral college
Speaker 0: Boston College.
Speaker 1: But they lost Columbia? No. They lost the popular vote, which is just destroying them. It's it's having them meltdown. They're freaking out.
So what happens? Their last their last attempt before they go to full on violence is let's try and do it in the courts. Because let's face it face it, the the process is the punishment when it comes to taking these things through court. And it's like, well, and and and it's not just the Democrats though. And I think you'll agree, it's the swampy Republicans, the rhinos, who are also in bed with this because they want the system to continue just to just fine the way it is because they're making bank as well.
So everybody's happy except for the the the, you know, oh, I guess, about 335,000,000 Americans who are unhappy with this. But you got a few hundred people who run the government that decided, well, we like it just the way it is. We're in charge. We control everything. You think you're cut off USAID?
We've got judges. We've got tons of judges all over the place that are gonna muck up the works and slow this thing down. And hopefully, we can, get back to regular order as far as they're concerned because the only democracy that's under attack is their bureaucracy.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
UNDERSTANDING THE MOVEMENT President Trump was almost jailed by his own DOJ in his first term! The FBI apparatus itself is a systemic problem that has to be taken apart brick by brick to end the cultural reward of cowardice. @TomFitton @Bannons_WarRoom https://t.co/168SSm3SMY
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump was almost jailed by his own Justice Department in his first term, due to figures like Jack Smith and Lisa Monaco. There should be a grand jury investigating the entire apparatus, as the problem is systemic, not just personnel-related. The FBI should be taken apart brick by brick, and its headquarters should be up for sale. The FBI's culture rewards corruption and cowardice in ethics and morality. The FBI has the best PR operation in Washington, D.C., making them untouchable, with no one in Congress willing to defang or cut their funding. Members of Congress are intimidated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Folks, you have to understand something to understand our movement and the revolutionary nature of what we're attempting to do to restore this to a constitutional republic. Fenton repeated again, President Trump was almost jailed by his own justice department in his first term. This just was a Jack Smith and Lisa Monaco, they're all demons and I don't know why we don't have a grand jury right now investigating the whole crap, the apparatus itself, it's a systemic problem, it's not just a personnel problem, it's a systemic problem, it has to be taken apart brick by brick and the FBI, I don't know why we don't have the headquarters up for sale, we've to take it apart brick by brick, break the thing up into a couple of pieces and not, I don't think be out doing Instagrams about how great they are, they're not great and don't right now, I don't care about arresting guys in the top 10 most wanted, that's fine, that's fine, go ahead sir.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, had the FBI come to my house a few years ago to give me a subpoena. Yeah, forgive me for thinking this is a little bit personal. You know, we've worked with the FBI, we've actually hired former FBI guys. It's, you know, I don't even want to kind of give credit to the argument, well, there are good people working in the FBI. That is not the point.
And there may be good people working in the FBI, but they're scared in the corner, and unable to do anything. So it's not about them. The culture rewards corruption, cowardice in terms of ethics and morality. That's what we saw, that's what we see repeatedly. You know, remember, we got some, and they've got the, FBI's got the best PR operation in Washington, D.
C. Second to none. Every foreign government looking for, you know, PR operations in DC, every corporation, they should see, look to see what the FBI had. Untouchable in terms of, oh, we, do you hear anyone in Congress talking about defanging the FBI? Even cutting a dollar from the FBI?
Speaker 0: No. They're afraid. They're intimidated. No, they're intimidated.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
POLICE OFFICER PERJURED HERSELF IN DEREK CHAUVIN CASE? There is new evidence being uncovered by @LizCollin in the George Floyd "we have 14 police officers that have said Katie Blackwell perjured herself in his trial." @JackPosobiec https://t.co/siEm6w7nj9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Katie Blackwell, the Minneapolis Police Department's training commander at the time, testified that the knee restraint Chauvin used was unfamiliar to her. Chauvin's lawyers argued that it was exactly how he had been trained to restrain a suspect.
According to Speaker 1, Derek Chauvin's attorney plans to use declarations from 34 police officers who stated that the technique used was exactly how they were trained, with 14 claiming Katie Blackwell perjured herself during the trial. Approximately 50 people came forward with declarations. Speaker 1 notes that the mainstream media in Minnesota did not cover the book or documentary related to the case but covered the lawsuit against Alpha News. Speaker 1 questions why the assistant police chief hasn't been asked if she lied in the Chauvin trial and also questions the tactics used by the prosecution, led by Attorney General Keith Ellison.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Katie Blackwell testified, she at the time was the training commander. So all training that was received by the Minneapolis Police Department was was overseen by her, and she testified that that well, I believe she said it was not familiar to her, the, the knee restraint that was used, and yet, of course, Chauvin's argument and his his lawyers argued that this was in fact exactly how he had been trained to restrain a, a suspect when, when they were acting the way that that George Floyd was. And so, basically, I guess, the what the court is ruling here is that there is a degree of truth to what you said. Now that being the case then, is this something that show this ruling, is this something that Chauvin himself could use in a potential and I obviously, he is filing appeals. Is this a ruling that he could then use in his favor?
Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. We've already been in touch with Derek Chauvin's attorney. Greg Joseph is representing him in his state appeal, and he plans to use these declarations. So keep in mind, we have 34 police officers as part of our case that have said this is exactly how we trained. We used MRT.
Fourteen of them said that Katie Blackwell perjured herself in his trial. And these are sworn court declarations that Greg Joseph intends to use for Derek Chauvin's trial. But we had about 50 people in all come forward and do declarations on behalf of of Alpha News for our case. We're obviously grateful to all of them. It's it's sometimes a tough go here in Minnesota, Jack.
I know you know that know that well, but it does seem that perhaps a little bit more every day, you know, that the truth is being told and and perhaps more accepted now than than ever before. Keep in mind, you know, the the book, the documentary, this was not covered at all by the mainstream media in Minnesota, but they were very quick to jump and and cover on the fact that we were being sued, almost cheering this, lawsuit on in a way. But it's quite interesting how no one has yet to ask, the assistant police chief, again, in Minnesota's largest city, if she lied in the, you know, most high profile hearing, you know, court proceeding in Minnesota history, essentially, and what does that mean to the job that that she currently has. So we'll continue, of course, to to follow it here at at Elfa News. But but also keep in mind, the sit you know, she questioned the tactics, the techniques used by the prosecution in in Chauvin's trial as well, led by Attorney General Keith Ellison.
So, I think there's more to come.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
PAM BONDI SUSPENDS ATTORNEY FOR BETRAYAL After failing to follow a directive, Enez Reuveni has been suspended. Cleaning house! @SteveGruberShow @AGPamBondi https://t.co/LVWnbTR5D6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Attorney General Pam Bondi suspended DOJ attorney Erez Riovini for failing to defend the Trump administration in a deportation case. Riovini, acting deputy director of immigration litigation, allegedly undermined the U.S. government in court. His supervisor, August Flenge, was also suspended for failing to supervise Riovini.
The case involves Kilmar Abrigo Garcia, an El Salvadoran illegal immigrant deported in March 2019. Judge Paul Zenas ordered Garcia's return, arguing there was no factual basis for his detention. The Trump administration maintains Garcia has gang affiliations.
The White House called Zenas' order to return Garcia unlawful, stating he is in El Salvador and beyond their authority. The DOJ maintains Zenas erred, as Garcia's removal was lawful and final. The Supreme Court temporarily blocked Zenas' order, with Amy Coney Barrett joining the three liberals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Attorney general Pam Bondi has suspended DOJ attorney Erez Riovini for failing to defend the Trump administration in a key door deportation case. Riovini is the acting deputy director of immigration litigation and was removed for not following orders while advocating for The US in court. Riovini's supervisor acting director August Flenge was also suspended for, quote, failing to supervise a subordinate. The suspensions follow the court case of El Salvadoran illegal immigrant, Kilmar Abrigo Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador in March. Garcia entered The US illegally.
02/2011. Ordered deported. 02/2019 ICE deported him to the terrorism confinement center in El Salvador in March. Obama appointed US District Judge Paul Zenas ordered Garcia returned. Religion deportation was illegal.
The court argued there was no factual basis for Garcia to be held. Riovini responded he had no answers for the court undermining his client, the US government. Trump administration maintains Garcia has gang affiliations. Oh, and by the way, a new court ruling say that he can stay there. Yeah.
Pam Bondi says that these attorneys need to zealously defend the interest of The United States. The White House responded to Zinnia's order to facilitate and effectuate Garcia's return by midnight Monday as unlawful, stating Garcia is else El Salvadoran. And he's held in his own country beyond the defendant's authority to effectuate his return to The US. The DOJ maintains that Genie's aired in the hearing because it is outside her jurisdiction and Garcia's removal is lawful and final. Last night, the Supreme Court blocked Jeannie's order with a temporary stay blocking the Trump administration's deportation of Garcia for now, greenlighting Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act five four, proving again that Amy Coney Barrett is dangerous to America.
She joined the three liberals on the court. We'll keep an eye on that for you.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
"WE'RE FINALLY GETTING COSTS UNDER CONTROL...NO ONE LIKES TALKING ABOUT IT." @POTUS jokes that maybe one day a story will be written on lower costs. https://t.co/MEyLWE9y3o
Video Transcript AI Summary
Energy costs and gasoline prices are way down. Grocery costs are also coming down, and the country is finally getting costs under control. No one wants to talk about it because the news is so positive. The price of eggs has plummeted by 50%, but no one has written about it yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Looks great. It's Biden like this, and then we're like this. But we also by the way, we low we lowered energy costs, really, like, tremendously. Energy is way down. Cost of gasoline is way down.
The cost of groceries, a word that I used a lot on the campaign. It's like an old fashioned word, but it's a beautiful word, very descriptive word. And the groceries are coming down, Brooke, at a level that very I mean, we're finally getting costs under control in our country, and people don't like talking about it because it's so good. It's so positive. I haven't seen one story on eggs plummeting by 50%, but someday, we'll they'll get around to writing it.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
EXPERIENCED BLACKHAWK PILOT WEIGHS IN Procedural violations and communication errors seem to have caused the D.C. crash. While it’s hard to believe they didn’t see the plane, what could explain this? @DLGaub @DBrodyReports @TBatesNews @WorkingWomanTV https://t.co/CcIwKlj1ta
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies two potential issues related to a helicopter incident: a procedural violation of airspace rules and a communications error. Helicopter flights in the area are required to follow specific transit routes at restricted altitudes, and it appears the helicopter may have exceeded the 200-foot ceiling, putting it in the path of fixed-wing aircraft. The speaker believes the helicopter crew did not see the other aircraft.
Regarding night vision goggles, the speaker doubts they were in use due to the well-lit urban environment, which tends to wash them out. The speaker notes that when at the same altitude or slightly higher than another aircraft in a dense urban environment at night, the aircraft's lights can easily blend into the surrounding lights from cars, traffic, streetlights, and houses. The speaker recalls losing visibility of a 747 in South Korea due to this effect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But, when it comes to the actual aircraft and the flight and the videos and evidence that that I have seen, which are the same ones you've seen as well as the air traffic control tapes, experience tell told me that there's two main things that I'm looking at. One of them is there appears to have been a procedural violation potentially of the airspace rules around the airport in DC in general. And what I mean by that is the helicopter flights through this specific location are required to go down very well defined transit routes at restricted altitudes and left and right lateral limits and so you have to fly within here. If they were above that to what's called a 200 foot ceiling, which means you can't go higher than this legally, but physically you can. If they were higher than that, that puts them in the path of fixed wing aircraft landing and descending out of Reagan.
Sounds like that is a very likely to have happened. And when you look at the video, you see an aircraft helicopter that did not change its trajectory, airspeed, anything and ran into an aircraft that it clearly could did not see for whatever reason we don't know yet. The second one being the communications error, and I can get into that in a little bit.
Speaker 1: Now I wanna get to you you said they clearly did not see that plane. And I was going to ask. I've jotted down some notes here. So we know that there were night vision goggles, that the pilot and the crew had night vision goggles on board. That's what we're hearing from the defense department.
And then there were obviously the lights from the plane itself. Without speculating, it seems hard to imagine that they could not see the plane and beyond that, that there wouldn't have been enough more warning to make some sort of maneuver, evasive maneuver. Now, you are the expert. So I guess I'm laying all these things out and asking you, you know, kind of what would have potentially been reasonable with all of those things in mind.
Speaker 0: Okay. Yeah. First thing I would tell you that the night vision goggle piece is probably not relevant to the discussion as far as the
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: Factor. If they were wearing them, which I doubt because you're not going to wear them in an area that is that well lit around in an urban environment. It tends to wash out the goggles. You can't see anything anyway. So being naked eye is usually safer.
And there are procedures also that tell you when you're not allowed to wear them anyways, which are too many details there. I won't worry about it. But the reason why I think the the lights piece is interesting is because as as an aviator, I'll tell you the perspective. Looking at another aircraft light and the lighting system, if you're at this at near the same altitude or maybe even a little bit higher than the aircraft you're looking at in a dense urban environment at night where it's extremely well lit, you can easily see the lights of that airplane blending into the night lights, cars, traffic, otherwise, street lights, houses, all that kind of stuff. It has happened to me before even in in South Korea.
I I pretty much lost visibility on an entire seven forty seven at a major airfield.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“THE PUBLIC VOTER FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP, THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR MAJOR GOVERNMENT REFORM, AND THAT’S WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET.” - @elonmusk responds to criticism of how he is running DOGE. President @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/UG9iWlFBWs
Video Transcript AI Summary
My critics, including many Democrats, accuse me of orchestrating a hostile, non-transparent government takeover. However, the public clearly voted for major government reform, which is exactly what they'll get. We're committed to transparency; our actions are posted on X and our website. We're implementing simple, basic checks and balances to ensure taxpayer money is used responsibly and correctly categorized. This isn't about individual judgment calls; it's about systemic improvements. Concerns about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding my past federal contracts, are addressed through our commitment to transparency and the implemented checks and balances. All our actions are public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your detractors, mister Muskelet I've what? Including a lot of Democrats.
Speaker 1: I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it.
Speaker 0: Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, that we we do have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign.
The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for. And that's what democracy is all about.
Speaker 0: Mister Vasquez, the White House says that you will identify and excuse yourself from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are are in effect policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency? Well,
Speaker 1: we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions, which are are maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been I I don't know the case that where where, an organization has been more transparent than the Doge organization. K.
And and so, you know and and the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very, very simple and basic. They're they're not we're we're you know, what I mentioned, for for example, about treasury, just making sure that that payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out, is categorized correctly, that the that the the payment is explained, that organizations on the do not pay list, which are takes a lot to get there, that actually are not paid, which currently they are paid. These these are these are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spread well. So it's got nothing to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all.
Speaker 0: But if there is a conflict in of interest when it comes to you, yourself, for instance, you've received billions of dollars in federal contracts when it comes to the Pentagon, for instance, which the president, I know, has directed you to look into Yeah. Are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people? Well, all of our actions are are, sec.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
PRESIDENT TRUMP ON USAID: "I WANT TO SEE WHERE THE KICKBACKS ARE" "The people that got all that money are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government?" @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/cnv64scb3b
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's significant fraud in USAID, with radical groups receiving funds they don't deserve. A staggering amount, like a hundred million, is being misallocated. It's crucial to investigate the kickbacks associated with this spending. Who would invest such sums in questionable projects? It's likely that those who received the funds are not returning any to the government, indicating a high level of corruption. The key issue is understanding the extent of these kickbacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at all the fraud that he's found in this, USAID. It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have even believed. The whole thing with a hundred million spent on you know what? With money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money.
I'd like to see what the kickbacks are. How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money to some of the things that you read about and I read about, and I see every night on the news and every morning when I read the papers? Who would spend money for that? I would say this, the people that got all that money, are they kicking it back to the people that gave it from government?
No. That's to me, very, very corrupt. The real question is how much of a kickback has
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“WE HAVE A MILITARY FAMILY; I’M VERY PROUD!” @MaryFlynnONeil1 joins @TedNugent to talk about supporting her brother @GenFlynn. “We have a long legacy in our family of service to country; we are blessed because of it.” https://t.co/Akw0y6epoY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mike and Mary express relief at having a qualified commander in chief. Mary reflects on her upbringing in a military family, highlighting her brothers’ service and the discipline instilled by their parents. She feels proud of their family’s military legacy and emphasizes the importance of standing together as Americans. Mike shares their father's story, a World War II veteran who served in Patton's army and retired as a master sergeant. They both acknowledge the deep-rooted commitment to serving their country that runs through their family.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, how about this, Mike and Mary? Do you feel a sense of overwhelming, thank god, relief that we have a commander in chief that actually qualifies as a commander in chief? Mary, growing up with your brother, Mike, this military warrior guy by the way, you know how much I love you, Mike. You know how much I love the warriors. I have taken that constitutional oath now for 40 years as a sheriff of Lake County, Michigan, and those words have spirit iron.
Mary, as you're growing up, born on a military base by the way, you and I are connected because my dad was a US army cavalry drill sergeant in World War 2 in in Korea, and he raised me like he was training a horse for the cavalry. So I know what it's like to grow up in a military environment. But explain to what how do you watch Mike maintain that oath to the constitution in his continued service to this great nation?
Speaker 1: Every I'm very proud very proud of my whole family, my brothers, my other brother Charlie, my brother Michael, my my other older brother Bill who served. You know, we and my sister's husband. I mean, we have a military family, and and we we have a parent our parents that were, you know, that we were brought up in the military and that's the only way they could handle us because we were wild. You know, we were a wild bunch and that's the way we were. And I'm very proud.
And I I watch him, go through the persecution and all of us, you know, stand strong. We stand by each other no matter what. And that's what we need to do as Americans. We need to stand for this country.
Speaker 2: And our father our father is whose name was Charlie, Charlie Flynn. He was a World War 2 vet, part of Patton's army that, that went over on d day. You know, he survived. And, again, what a great man. And, he was a he was a sergeant.
He was a, you know, sergeant e 5 at the time of World War 2, and he ended up retiring as a mass sergeant from the United States Army. So that's we have a long legacy in our family of service to country in uniform, Ted. And and now we're we're
Speaker 1: blessed
Speaker 2: because of it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've raised ethical questions about some senators, like Sen. Kane, highlighting their hypocrisy. I wonder how many have shown up drunk to vote at night and if anyone has asked them to step down. Also, if you want Rav on your schedule, let me know.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
"HOW MANY SENATORS HAVE SHOWN UP DRUNK TO VOTE AT NIGHT? HAVE YOU ASKED THEM TO STEP DOWN?" @SenMullin raising ethical questions for the Dems, like Sen. Kane and point out their hypocrisy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator from Massachusetts mentioned a military board position, while the Secretary of Defense, who stepped down from Raytheon, was given a waiver. This double standard is evident. Senator Kaine raised the issue of senators showing up drunk to votes; has anyone called for their resignation? Many senators have personal issues, yet no one demands they step down. The hypocrisy is clear when mistakes are highlighted only for political show. Everyone has made mistakes, and it's important to recognize that rather than holding others to an unrealistic standard. Acknowledgment of personal flaws is essential.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator from, from Massachusetts brought up about serving on a, on a board, inside the military industry, and yet your own secretary that you all voted for, secretary of Austin, we had to vote on a waiver because he stepped off the board of Raytheon. But I guess that's okay because that's a Democrat secretary of defense. But but you so quickly forget about that. And then senator Cain or, well, I guess, I better use the senator for Virginia starts bringing up the fact that what if you showed up drunk to your job? How many senators have showed up drunk to vote at night?
Have any of you guys asked them to step down and resign for their job? And don't tell me you haven't seen it because I know you have. And then how many senators do you know have got a divorce before cheating on their wives? Did you ask them to step down? No.
But it's for show. You guys make sure you make a big show and point out the hypocrisy because a man's made a mistake. And you wanna sit there and say that he's not qualified? Give me a joke. I mean, it is so ridiculous that you guys hold yourself as this higher standard and you forget you got a big plank in your eye.
We've all made mistakes. I've made mistakes. And, Jennifer, thank you for loving him through that mistake.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
WANT RAV ON YOUR SCHEDULE? https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-real-americas-voice-232242864/
Real America’s Voice | iHeart
Real America’s Voice: Real News, Honest Views - Dive into a world of unfiltered news, in-depth analysis, and thought-provoking discussions featuring some of your favorite personalities. At Real America’s Voice, we cover a wide array of topics—politics, culture, and current events—through the lens of American values and freedom. We pride ourselves on delivering honest content that challenges mainstream narratives. Our passionate hosts are experts and commentators who offer unique insights on the issues that matter most to you. Whether you start your day with American Sunrise, follow breaking news in the War Room with Steve Bannon, gain political insights from Charlie Kirk, explore cultural commentary with Jack Posobiec, or tune-in for the latest with investigative reporter John Solomon and Just The News, you’ll find all your favorite programs on RAV right here on the RAV podcast, including coverage of our live events featured on the network. Join the Real America’s Voice community to stay informed, engaged, and inspired. Subscribe now and never miss an episode!
iheart.com
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
"IT'S NOT RIGHT... THEY'RE REPLACING US ALL." - @BenBergquam is on the ground in inner-city Chicago talking to American workers being replaced by illegal aliens. https://t.co/JtEuPdzWBt
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns about low-wage workers replacing American jobs, leading to inflation and unfair labor practices. This situation is seen as a scheme by the Democratic Party to undermine American workers, including Black individuals. Additionally, there are issues with children being used for panhandling in unsafe conditions, which raises concerns about child endangerment. Resources should be prioritized for American citizens, as many feel that the current labor market is unfairly benefiting those who work for lower wages. This affects everyone, regardless of race, and there is a call to take action leading up to the 2024 elections to address these issues effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They used to say we didn't wanna work, but when slavery was out here, we used to work from sun up to sun down for free. Now they're trying to replace us with this low wage earners.
Speaker 1: But the most concern is this, is that these illegals now would drive our economy to much more inflation. You're talking about big businesses, to much more inflation. You're talking about big businesses firing American workers, putting them to work for probably half to pay, no benefits. So this has been a real cruel, wicked scheme by the Democratic Party to replace not only black people, but all Americans in this economy to make money.
Speaker 2: And on top of that, these kids are using as pawns all over the city. Every corner you see them with the panhandling with kids.
Speaker 3: Yeah. It's just not right. They and they seem to be dropped off there. It seems very organized. So there are many issues here, and you just can't have children out.
Today, it's 30:39 degrees. You can't have children outside with you panhandling. It's just it's illegal. It's it's child endangerment, and we need to take action.
Speaker 0: As far as the conditions, no. I'm not jealous of these conditions. I understand,
Speaker 4: what jail is like.
Speaker 0: You understand me? And this is jail if you ask me. So, no, I'm not jealous of this, but I do believe the resources need to be allocated to the American people the right way.
Speaker 4: Not even if it hurts the American people, but my son, he's 12 years old. I got a family. I have to survive. I I'm a general contractor, licensed general contractor, licensed and bonded in the city of Chicago. And look what is done because they come over here and put a black guy in the game.
They get cheap labor. Other companies are hiring them. They doing the they they doing the work almost $7. So so it makes it hard for me. It's not right.
Democrat, republican, yes. They replacing us all. No matter what color you are, orange, green, red, yellow, they're replacing us all.
Speaker 1: All of these things are good, and we have to follow-up on them. But if we don't man the groundwork coming up to this 20 24 elections. All of it means nothing.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
BREAKING: SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON BELIEVES FOREIGN INFLUENCE W/DEM FUNDS @JSolomonReports breaks story that Johnson believes China, Iran, Russia and Venezuela have moved money to Democrats, including ActBlue, a 16 billion dollar enterprise. @Stinchfield1776 https://t.co/nEtsa5AM7R
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Mike Johnson expressed serious concerns about potential foreign interference in U.S. elections, specifically alleging that China, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela may have funneled money to Democrats through platforms like ActBlue. He warned that this could evolve into a significant political scandal, with evidence likely surfacing after the election. Johnson emphasized the gravity of receiving more funds through alleged cheating, indicating that if these countries are found to be involved, Congress will impose serious penalties. His remarks were notably strong and specific, suggesting he possesses information that has not yet been disclosed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just talked to speaker Mike Johnson a little bit ago. The story is gonna be going up a little bit in just the news. Speaker Johnson, on the record, says he has serious concerns that China, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela have moved money to Democrats, have wandered money to Democrats, possibly through ActBlue and other online fundraising, mechanisms. He says that this is about to become a major scandal, may not break until after the election. That's when all the evidence will be assembled, but he's putting everybody on notice that this could be a major political scandal cheating.
And when you get more money than the other side because you cheated, it is potentially a very serious matter. Mike Johnson's words, very strong, very specific. He's usually very careful, so he's hanging out in a limb. He knows something we don't know. He also said that if they find any of these countries, there will be serious penalties imposed by Congress if it is proven they have been, interfering in the election by laundering money to Democrats.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
"THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE EXCITED ABOUT AMERICA AND EXCITED ABOUT IT'S FUTURE!" @SenMarcoRubio comments on the way the fake media has portrayed Trump supporters and rallygoers. https://t.co/T6g7qFN4Mn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Excitement about America's future is palpable as we approach Tuesday's election. In stark contrast, the messaging from Kamala Harris's campaign is alarmingly negative and destructive. Recently, she and her supporters have used terms like "fascist" to describe opponents, with one even comparing Trump supporters to Nazis. This rhetoric mirrors past statements from Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, who suggested locking up Trump politically. Such language is not just random; it comes from prominent figures in the Democratic Party. This campaign is marked by negativity and hostility, unlike the joy and optimism we bring as we support Donald Trump's candidacy for president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are people that are excited about America and excited about its future because what we're about to do on Tuesday, what you're about to do on Tuesday. And I it strikes me if I wanna compare that for a moment to what I think it has to be, I think it is, the nastiest, ugliest, most dangerously destructive messaging in a campaign closed in modern American history than what we're seeing out of Kamala Harris and her campaign. This is nasty stuff. Nasty stuff. Just in the last week just in the last week, she said she you know, this thing with they're obsessed with this word fascist.
You heard them saying these things? And then and then and then you have the the guy that she picked that they want people to vote for to be the next vice president of the United States, comparing supporters of Donald Trump to the Nazis in Germany. By the way, Hillary Clinton said the exact same thing, but the same thing. Like, usually No. Sorry, guys.
Joe Biden already took that line. Did you hear him say that? He wants to lock up Donald Trump. But he meant it in the political sense. He meant in whatever.
You know? Anyways, this very and this this stuff is not coming from, like, random these are like the guy who wants to be vice president, the failed presidential candidate of 2016. Has she conceded that election yet? I don't think she's conceded 2016. And, and and and the and and then MSNBC.
Oh, forget it. Never mind. I don't even talk about it. My whole point. But this is this is dangerously and dangerous, nasty stuff.
Really, one of the most negative, vile hate campaigns that I've seen of any candidate in a close, and compare that to the joy and the happiness that we're campaigning on to make sure we elect Donald Trump the next president of the United States.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
BREAKING: There are FIVE ASSASSINATION TEAMS targeting TRUMP. Rep @MattGaetz explains this new developing information. #assasinationattempt @JackPosobiec Watch this Human Events Ep.👇 https://rumble.com/v5fj15g-human-events-with-jack-posobiec.html WATCH RAV 24/7 ▶ bit.ly/plutorav
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, an individual from Homeland Security informed his office before the second assassination attempt that there were 5 known assassination teams in the United States: 3 inspired by foreign governments and 2 domestic. This individual was concerned that President Trump's force protection was insufficient.
The speaker clarified that all 5 teams were targeting Trump. This raised questions about why security teams were being pulled from Trump's detail to be assigned to Joe Biden, John Bolton, and others, despite the threat level to Trump being substantially higher. The speaker also claimed that requests from the Trump detail and campaign for more security were being ignored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of Homeland Security in my office before the second assassination attempt saying that, what he has assessed is that there are 5 known assassination teams in the United States. 3 inspired by other governments, 2 that are here that are known domestic assassination teams. And with that, this individual was coming to me concerned that the force protection around president Trump even prior to that sec second assassination attempt was not sufficient for what it needed to be. And the coordination at that level, at the dignitary protection level, is like the the bare minimum that we have to do to keep our presidents, our presidential candidates safe while they're on the trail. So there are 5 I just wanted to follow-up.
5 assassination teams, are they all targeting Trump? Is it other officials? No. I should have been clear about that. Five teams that we know are targeting Trump.
And so that raises real questions about why certain, teams were being pulled off of the Trump deal detail and put on, for example, the Joe Biden detail. Now we don't want anything bad to happen to Joe Biden, but at the same time, the threat envelope for her was substantially different than the threat envelope around president Trump, and it would not have necessitated pulling assets away from the Trump detail for the Joe Biden detail or the John Bolton detail or any other details that were beefed up. At the same time, the requests from the Trump detail and from the Trump campaign for more security were going unanswered.
HUMAN EVENTS DAILY WITH GUEST HOST JOHN SOLOMON
The real events of the world are out there, but it all depends on who you listen to. Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec brings you unfiltered and factual updates on how current events will impact o
rumble.com
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
WATCH: @BenBergquam on the ground with a look at why he believes the Biden-Harris Admin is gaming the border numbers. JOIN LIVE: https://rumble.com/v5alddh-law-and-border-with-been-bergquam.htm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden and the Democrats are misleading the public about decreasing numbers at the southern border. The reality is that the flow of migrants is continuous and increasing. Recently, facilities called "mobility centers" have been established in Central America, which are being used to create refugees. Many of these migrants are economic migrants seeking better lives, but they don't qualify for asylum. The United Nations is involved in helping them gain refugee status, allowing them to be flown into the U.S. unnoticed. This strategy masks the true numbers entering the country while the border situation remains unresolved. The administration appears to be exploiting the situation for political gain, disregarding the concerns of American citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just realized something. How how pathetic, how treacherous, how, diabolical these guys are. So Joe Biden, think about this, Oscar. Joe Biden and the Democrats are pretending like the numbers are going down at our southern border. We're here in the jungle.
The numbers are massive every single day. It's nonstop. When we first started coming here, you'd see 1 or 2 groups a day. Now it's just continuous. But what we just got word I got a call from Todd Dentsman from Center For Immigration Studies.
We just got word that these facilities that we uncovered out here in the jungle, 15 acre facilities, they're calling them mobility centers. We haven't heard anything from secretary Blinken this entire time. Until about a month ago, he started announcing these welcoming centers in America. So they started building these welcoming centers in America. At the same time, they're building these so called mobility centers in Central America.
From what Todd has gathered, these mobility centers centers are simply a way to create refugees. So these all of these illegals that are coming through, they're all economic migrants. They're all fleeing their country for a better life, which I I totally get that, but it doesn't qualify for asylum in America. But if they can catch them on their way, they're actually using United Nations OIM to apply for them at these facilities to get them refugee status so then they can fly them directly into our country, and nobody sees it. So the numbers at the border go down, but the numbers that are going into our country go up.
This is treason. It's treason. And so not only are they not fixing the border problems, they're laughing at the American people saying how stupid you must be to even believe what we're saying simply for an election year. That's what's happening. Joe Biden running for office.
He's open border Democrats. They don't wanna fix the problem. They want more of this. They want more more of the ceasefire. They want more of these all of these Palestinians.
They want more of the BLM and Antifas, all the razas. They want more of this. That is insane, man.
LAW AND BORDER WITH BEN BERGQUAM
We invite you to join us for a Brand New Episode of Law & Border hosted by RAV investigative reporter, Ben Bergquam. Tune in tonight here on Rumble at 7pm EST. Catch past episodes: https://americasvoi
rumble.com
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“We have an affidavit from a Secret Service whistleblower that they were supposed to be there, but they were told to stand down.” - @MikeBenzCyber Watch LIVE➡ bit.ly/plutorav Watch more @HumanEvents with @JackPosobiec here: https://rumble.com/v59gnj7-human-events-with-jack-posobiec.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the need for investigation into a potential stand down order during an incident involving the President. They emphasize the importance of identifying the person who gave the order and their connections to determine if there was prior knowledge. They call for subpoenas to be issued by the weaponization committee due to lack of answers from agencies involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It would have taken foreknowledge, either by the FBI or DHS, the Secret Service is under DHS, of of this individual planning to do what he did in the way that he did it. That is going to the roof at that time in order to take a shot at the President. And someone within the FBI or within DHS would have then had to have communicated with DHS's Secret Service to say stand down at this time, at this aspect of the perimeter, I. E. The roof.
And so that's really the the link here. And so so the the thing that needs to be drilled down to is is this the nature of the stand down. Again, we have a affidavit from a secret service whistleblower that they were supposed to be there, but they were told to stand down. And so everything else that you're identifying here really flows from this question of why this, why they had such lack security, why they chose to ignore so many standard protocols? Well, that question may be answered by knowing the name of the officer who ordered that stand down from the roof, and and that happened at 2 points, right?
There was supposed to be someone on the roof, that person had a stand down, and there was supposed to be, as you mentioned, a sniper team with a line of sight to the roof and they were not there. Now, whether they they wandered off randomly or were they given a stand down or to go to where they told by someone else to go to a different roof? Well, the question here is sort of solved by knowing the name of the person who gave that order because then you just get all the comms of that agent or officer and see who they're connected to. What advance notice they have? Were they in communications with the FBI?
Did they have advanced knowledge that there was a deranged loaner planning to use the roof? Because if that's the case, then it's it's case closed and we can move right to prosecution.
Speaker 1: And of course, we we need to look into all of these. We're not getting any answers. We're not getting answers from the the Secret Service, or it's not giving any. The FBI is not giving any. Homeland Security is not getting any.
This is why we need Jim Jordan, the weaponization committee. We need to start issuing subpoenas. We need to issue subpoenas right now.
HUMAN EVENTS WITH JACK POSOBIEC
The real events of the world are out there, but it all depends on who you listen to. Human Events with Jack Posobiec brings you unfiltered and factual updates on how current events will impact our cou
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
According to @MikeBenzCyber, the government collaborates with Big Tech, universities, the private sector, and media organizations to censor Americans. This censorship enterprise is seen as necessary to maintain the rules-based international order. Watch the live stream for more information.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
The Government's Role in Censorship Metastasized So Fast and So Extensively @FFO_Freedom Executive Director @MikeBenzCyber says virtually every federal government agency coordinates with Big Tech, universities, the private sector, and media organizations to censor Americans. “It really is a kind of nation-globe spanning government censorship enterprise which they saw as being totally necessary to save the rules-based international order,” says Benz. Watch LIVE➡️bit.ly/plutorav Join us in chat on our 24/7 LIVE Rumble stream! https://rumble.com/user/RealAmericasVoice/live
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's censorship power has grown rapidly, leading to the creation of a whole society censorship network involving various government agencies, universities, NGOs, and media outlets. This initiative was established after the 2016 election to combat misinformation and protect the international order. The government dictates speech policies, funds censorship efforts, and influences media organizations to control the narrative. This extensive censorship enterprise was deemed necessary to maintain the status quo and prevent the rise of populist movements that challenge the foreign policy establishment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Way to government power. Yeah. Well, it's because the government's role in censorship has metastasized so fast and so extensively you know, into the brain and lungs of the government's functioning that to unwind it now is, is effectively seen as a, is, you know, changing core aspects of government business. You see after the 2016 election, the, the US federal government in cahoots with a cabal of foreign policy establishment stakeholders and, financial and commercial interests on the outside came up with this idea of a so called whole of society, whole of government censorship network. Now they didn't call it a censorship network.
They called it the whole society counter, miss, dis, and malinformation alliance. But they don't mean countering it through speech. They mean countering it through censorship and taking down opposing speech because they couldn't compete in a free and open market of ideas for it. So this idea of the government quarterbacking a whole society censorship alliance that spans the private sector, the civil society institutions like the universities, NGOs, and media allies, including government funded fact checking organizations has become so well worn that even in government meetings, they will apologize amongst themselves for using the phrase whole of society because they say it so much like a mantra even within the government, they're kind of sick of, of of saying it, but that remains the facts on the ground, which is to say that virtually every government agency at this point, DHS, FBI, State Department, Pentagon, National Science Foundation, HHS, CDC, even the FDA, all have censorship offices within the government that play a coordinating role to tell the social media platforms what to do, what to take down, what what speech policies to enact or get rid of, to fund the civil society organizations, to act as censorship mercenary firms.
There's over 60 US universities that get government funding to do censorship work. So it's 100 of NGOs and nonprofits. Then there's the fact checking arm in the media literacy program where the government pays media organizations in order to pump up their profits that they can compete with alternative news online. It really is a kind of, nation slash globe spanning government censorship enterprise, which they saw as being, you know, totally necessary, to save the rules based international order. Remember all this really started with Donald Trump's election in 2016 and the Brexit vote across the ocean and this idea that NATO was going to come undone because people were simply going to vote for populist parties who oppose the foreign policy establishment.
So they thought the EU would come undone and NATO would come undone, so there'd be no enforcement arm for international creditors like the IMF or the World Bank. From their perspective, from the halls of the Pentagon and the State Department and the CIA, as well as the Chamber of Commerce companies on the outside who depend on the battering ram of our national security state in order to pry open markets for them. It was an end of the world kind of thing that rec that only the government could quarterback. You know, Stanford Internet Observatory can't knock on the door of Facebook with the cloud to tell them what to do. Can't knock on the door of the New York Times, tell them what to do.
But the government can.
GET REAL NEWS AND HONEST VIEWS 24/7
RAV delivers news programs and live-event coverage that captures the authentic voice and passion of real people all across America. ALSO WATCH US LIVE ON: PLUTO https://bit.ly/plutorav ROKU https://bi
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The @JudiciaryGOP released testimony from a whistleblower claiming that the CIA prevented the Justice Department from interrogating one of Hunter Biden's funders. @MikeBenzCyber believes that Hunter Biden's involvement in Ukraine may have touched on a sensitive CIA operation, explaining why he remains untouchable. Watch the discussion with Steve Bannon here: bit.ly/plutorav. More #WarRoom content available at rumble.com/v4kwac9-war-room-with-steve-bannon-pm-edition.html.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
A Surprising New Development Involving Hunter Biden The @JudiciaryGOP just released testimony from a whistleblower who said the CIA waived the Justice Department off an interrogation it wanted to do about one of Hunter Biden's sweetheart funders. Why would the CIA do this? @FFO_Freedom Executive Director @MikeBenzCyber shares his thoughts with Steve Bannon. "To my mind, and this is my opinion, there's no great mystery here," Benz said. "I have been screaming for the better part of two years now that the reason Hunter Biden is untouchable is because his work in Ukraine touched on a very sensitive CIA operation." Watch LIVE➡️bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #WarRoom here: https://rumble.com/v4kwac9-war-room-with-steve-bannon-pm-edition.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The whistleblower revealed that the CIA intervened to stop the Justice Department from investigating a major funder of Hunter Biden. This suggests Hunter Biden's ties to a sensitive CIA operation in Ukraine may be the reason for his protection. Various key players, including politicians like Joe Biden and Mitt Romney, along with organizations like the National Democratic Institute and the Atlantic Council, are linked to this complex web of interests aimed at shifting the European gas market away from Russia towards NATO. The involvement of CIA-affiliated individuals and organizations indicates a broader agenda at play in shielding Hunter Biden from scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whistleblower had come to them from the CIA and said that the CIA had had, had waived the Justice Department off an interrogation that it had wanted to do about one of the sweetheart funders of Hunter Biden and why would the CIA be telling the DOJ to back off in an interview of the person funding Hunter Biden. Well, to my mind and this is opinion I should note is there's no great mystery here. I have been screaming for the better part of 2 years now that the reason that Hunter Biden is untouchable is because his work in Ukraine touched on a very sensitive CIA operation. That's what as I read the tea leaves, it seems highly likely and I suspect that if you were to have an investigation into this by say the House Intelligence Committee or there could be declassified documents about CIA analyst memos and CIA operations around Burisma, I think you would essentially have the scales around Hunter Biden completely fall off. And the reason for this is because we have had a long range plan to bankrupt Gazprom, the state owned Russian gas giant, which makes up a huge proportion of Russia's revenues.
It's a big part of how Russia funds its war machine. Russia's war machine has been what's opposed the Pentagon around the world in a very big way over the past 8 to 10 years. The reason that President Obama failed to basically capture Syria and take out the Bashar Al Assad regime was because Russia militarily backstopped Syria with these S400 missile defense systems. Russia also runs small arms to rebel groups all around the world, in opposition to Pentagon interests. You also have this basically $1,000,000,000,000 windfall that NATO energy companies would earn if you could kill Gazprom and replace the energy exports to Europe with NATO stakeholders.
You had Chevron signing a $10,000,000,000 deal with NAFTA Gas in Ukraine, which is the feeder from Burisma in 2013. You had also in 2013, right before the coup, a $10,000,000,000 deal signed by Shell. You have Exxon with 1,000,000,000 of dollars in interest there. You have Halliburton, Dick Cheney's, the company that he was the CEO and Chairman of the Board, who's got the processing rights for the shale fields in the Donbas as well as for the offshore drilling in the Black Sea. So you have basically a where's Waldo, who's who of all of the major players in the Chamber of Commerce, State Department, CIA Blob, who are all have vested interest in removing Russia from the European Energy Market and Burisma I believe was a part of that long range plan, right.
So Hunter Biden himself was on the Chairman Advisory Board of the NDI, the National Democratic Institute. That is the DNC wing of the National Endowment For Democracy who even the Washington Post reported on in the 19 nineties as being our premier CIA cut out. You don't get to be on the chairman's advisory board of NDI unless you are linked to or vetted by the Central Intelligence Agency. At the time, you know, Hunter Biden's father, Joe Biden was spent 30 years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which is the Senate's oversight of the State Department and the covert, you know, the o that that has to coordinate the covert side of of intelligence work. Now you also have the fact that you have the Atlantic Council was neck deep in Burisma.
They had a formal cooperation agreement they signed in January 2017, just 2 weeks before Trump was inaugurated. The Atlantic Council has 7 CIA directors on its board, and it gets annual funding for the Pentagon, the state department, and and the CIA cut out National Endowment For Democracy. They held a 3 day summit on Gazprom as an instrument of statecraft and how to remove it while simultaneously propping up the Ukrainian gas market through companies like Burisma and NAFTA Gas. So you have basically this sweeping CI consensus zone. By the way, you even have USAID funding.
You know, USAID is you know, to to Burisma, USAID was, you know, is is long been one of the premier, conduits for cash being flowed to to clandestine CIA operations. So between the CIA cut out work through the NDI, through between the affiliation with the Atlanta Council, which has 7 CIA directors on its board, through the through the role of USAID in this story, to the fact that the that right next to Hunter Hunter Biden on Burisma's board was Cofer Black who spent 30 years in the CIA and was Mitt Romney's Sherpa to the intelligence world in the 2012 presidential election, who won a CIA distinguished medal award, was the other, you know, American on the board of, of Burisma there representing, you know, the IRI side of it. Mitt Romney is on the board of the of the IRI which is the GOP side of that, CIA cut out National Endowment for Democracy. So you had this John McCain, Mitt Romney, Republican CIA interest and you had this Hunter Biden, Atlantic Council, Democrat, Nexus all invested in joint spoils for switching the European gas market from Russia towards NATO. And I believe that's the reason that you have the CIA stepping in to, to shield hunt, who's really funding Hunter Biden from scrutiny.
WAR ROOM WITH STEVE BANNON PM EDITION
Welcome to the War Room. Steve Bannon and special guests bring you the most important news from around the world. Watch LIVE on Real America’s Voice, seven days a week at 10:00 AM EST and again at 5:0
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Embalmers are reporting the presence of white fibrous clots in bodies since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. A survey conducted by former U.S. Air Force Major Tom Haviland found that around 70% of embalmers have observed these clots, with the majority noticing them in 2021. Some embalmers even reported seeing clots in over 50% of the bodies they worked on. Watch the full discussion on #StinchfieldTonight with @stinchfield1776.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
Nasty Looking Clots Embalmers say that ever since the COVID-19 vaccine became available they are seeing white fibrous clots. Former U.S. Air Force Major Tom Haviland set out to determine if that was a real phenomenon. He surveyed state funeral director associations and more than 1,700 funeral homes. The survey produced three main conclusions: (1) About seven out of 10 embalmers were seeing the white fibrous clots. (2) The majority of those embalmers started seeing the clots in 2021, after the vaccines rolled out and (3) Some of these embalmers saw clots in up to 50 percent or more of their corpses. Watch LIVE➡️bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #StinchfieldTonight with @stinchfield1776 here: https://rumble.com/v43opow-grant-stinchfield-tonight-show-12-27-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the presence of white fibrous clots in bodies. They conducted a survey last year to determine if this phenomenon was real. The survey revealed that around 70% of embalmers were seeing these clots, with most of them noticing them after the rollout of vaccines in 2021. Some embalmers reported seeing these clots in up to 50% or more of the corpses they worked with. The speaker is currently conducting another survey to gather more information on what embalmers are observing in 2023.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'll just show the audience right here. Here's some of the clots that we're talking about. They are nasty, nasty looking clots, right? So, they do exist. This all came to my attention, the week of Thanksgiving of last year when that movie died suddenly came out And about 6 or 7 embalmers in that movie said they were seeing those white fibrous clots.
I wanted to see whether that was a real phenomenon or not. So I conducted a survey last year to see what, what embalmers we're seeing through the year 2022. I sent out a link to a survey in SurveyMonkey to, over 3 dozen national, regional, and state funeral director associations with hundreds of members underneath them. I also sent the email to over 1700 funeral homes directly around the world trying to get responses from boomers around the world to see what they were seeing. And the survey, the survey that we did last year, Grant had 3 main conclusions to it.
The, about 7 out of 10 of bolers were seeing the white fibrous clots. The majority of them started seeing the clots in 2021 after the vaccines rolled out. And then some of these embalmers are seeing these clots and up to 50% or more of their corpses. So then I've done a a, another survey this year then that's in progress right now that's that you that you see to see what the embolmergers are seeing this year at the end of 2023.
GRANT STINCHFIELD TONIGHT SHOW 12-27-23
join us for the Stinchfield Tonight show with your host, Grant Stinchfield. Watch LIVE here on Rumble, Pluto, or Dish, weekdays at 7:00 PM EST. Catch past shows: https://americasvoice.news/playlists/s
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Illinois Governor @realBlagojevich criticizes the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove President Trump from the ballot, suggesting it is a significant constitutional crisis. Watch the discussion with @RealMirandaKhan and find more on #SpecialReport. [Link to video]
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
The Greatest Constitutional Crisis Since The Civil War Former Illinois Governor @realBlagojevich says the Founding Fathers must be “rolling in their graves” from the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to kick President Trump off the ballot in the state. @RealMirandaKhan Watch LIVE➡ bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #SpecialReport here: https://rumble.com/v42dbbz-special-report-with-miranda-khan-and-tera-dahl-12-20-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern over the exclusion of a person from the ballot without any criminal conviction, viewing it as a form of extreme election interference. They criticize the misuse of the justice system for political purposes, highlighting the involvement of weaponized prosecutors and Democrat-appointed justices in Colorado. The speaker emphasizes that this issue affects all Americans, regardless of their political affiliation, as it undermines the right to vote and manipulates the courts. They believe that the current situation, including the persecution of President Trump, represents the greatest constitutional crisis in American history since the civil war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Governor, this sounds like just another form, an extreme form of election interference. Is it not? When you can have 4 state justices exclude someone from the ballot when he hasn't been even convicted of a crime?
Speaker 1: You know, our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves. They created a form of government, 3 separate Co equal branches to do checks and balances on each other to prevent 1 branch from abusing its power. And what we're seeing today in America Really is a perversion of the justice system and being used for political purposes. Not only do we now have weaponized prosecutors from the DOJ and Elected Democrats or prosecutors who've been prosecuting president Trump, we now see that there's a court in Colorado, the highest court in Colorado with Democrat appointed Justices who've, decided that 1 man who has been convicted of no crimes cannot be cannot run for president, much less have his name on the ballot. And While president Trump is the target of this persecution, it's We the People, the American people.
Democrats and Republicans and independents, all of us. We're the big losers because, all of us have a right to vote for someone or against someone. If you don't like president Trump, vote against him. But this idea That the courts can be weaponized now and be used as political tools in this country when they're supposed to be arbiters of justice. It doesn't just make me angry as an American and I've lived through a rigged court system and court process.
It also makes me sad for America because I believe what we're facing today With what they're doing to president Trump, weaponized prosecutions, courts now becoming political operatives, I do think this is the greatest constitutional crisis in American history Since the civil war.
SPECIAL REPORT WITH MIRANDA KHAN & TERA DAHL 12-20-23
Watch our Special Report with Miranda Khan & Tera Dahl weekdays at 4 PM EST. Catch past shows: ALSO WATCH US LIVE ON: ROKU https://bit.ly/rokurav PLUTO https://bit.ly/plutorav 🚨SUBSCRIBE TO OUR SUBSTA
rumble.com
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
Another Big Difference in Trump vs. Biden President Trump says that during his term Americans had all-time low mortgage rates. Watch LIVE➡️bit.ly/plutorav Join our LIVE coverage of President Trump’s remarks tonight from Coralville, IA: https://rumble.com/v41311r-president-trump-delivers-remarks-from-coralvill-ia-12-13-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
During my presidency, mortgage rates reached an all-time low of 2.6%. However, currently, it is difficult to obtain loans as banks are reluctant to lend money. With a $2,000 monthly mortgage payment, you can only afford a house valued at less than $295,000. In contrast, under the Trump administration, the same payment would have allowed you to purchase a house worth $460,000 today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Princess, and then how when I was your president, you had a 30 year mortgage rate, actually hit an all time low. The lowest it's ever been, about 2.6. I think 2.6%. Think of it. And now it's, you can't get the money.
It doesn't matter what it is. It's anything because you can't get the money. The banks don't wanna give you the money. Today, a $2,000 monthly mortgage payment gets you a house worth less than $295,000. Under the Trump administration, the same number would get you a house that today would be worth 460,000
PRESIDENT TRUMP DELIVERS REMARKS FROM CORALVILLE, IA 12-13-23
We invite you to join us for our live coverage of President Trump's speech in Coralville, Iowa starting at 7pm ET. RAV delivers news programs and live-event coverage that captures the authentic voice
rumble.com
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
It's no wonder Crooked Joe Biden and the far-left lunatics are desperate to stop us...because we are beating them so badly in the polls. - President Donald Trump Join our LIVE Coverage of President Trump’s Speech: https://rumble.com/v3z9k9t-president-trumps-speaking-engagements-in-iowa-12-2-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Crooked Joe Biden and the far left are desperate to stop us, using any means possible. They're weaponizing law enforcement for election interference because we're beating them so badly. The Washington Post had us up 11 points and even apologized for it. The next day, they announced we were up 12 points. In the latest Harvard Harris poll, we're leading with 7 points, followed by Desanctimonious at 9 and Bert Baron at 8.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no wonder Crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means possible. They don't care how they don't care. They don't have any scruples. They're weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the post. You take a look, the Washington post had us up 11.
Washington post and they apologized to it. Can you believe it? They said, there must be something wrong. He's up 11. Then the following day, they announced we were up 12.
And the Harvard Harris poll just came out. Just this is a brand new one. We're leading the field with c 7 with desanctimonious at 9. And Bert Baron is at 8.
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS IN IOWA 12-2-23
We invite you to join us for both of President Trump's speaking engagements today in Des Moines and Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Our live coverage starts at 1PM ET. all the way through both events. RAV deliver
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Kari Lake's loss in the Arizona election is believed to have contributed to the current situation at the southern border. Ben Bergquam, a host on Law and Border, shares updates from Lukeville, Arizona. He shows Steve Bannon footage of tents housing illegal immigrants from West Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and an increasing number from Syria. To watch the live updates, click here: http://bit.ly/plutorav. For more on the situation, visit: https://rumble.com/v3o9j1d-war-room-with-steve-bannon-am-show-10-10-23.html.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“This would not be happening in Arizona if Kari Lake hadn’t had the election stolen from her by Katie Hobbs.” Law and Border Host @BenBergquam joins the #WarRoom LIVE from Lukeville, Arizona to give an update on the southern border invasion. Bergquam shows Steve Bannon footage of tents filled with illegal immigrants from West Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, including a growing number from Syria. Watch LIVE http://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #WarRoom here: https://rumble.com/v3o9j1d-war-room-with-steve-bannon-am-show-10-10-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ben Bergquam provides an update on the situation at the border. Four vehicles, including a bus and three transport vans, have already left. There are 13 border patrol vehicles on-site. One truck was used to carry the luggage of the illegal immigrants. The tents are full, and they separate single adult males from West Sub Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and now Syria. Women and children are sent first, followed by the men. This happens daily, and it is emphasized that this situation in Arizona is a result of the election theft that occurred with Carrie Lake and Katie Hobbs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben Bergquam, you're there. Give me a minute or 2. Ben's gonna be back with me at 5. Ben, I appreciate you hanging out, while I was going on my rant. Give me an update.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Let me just, I'm gonna step out of the camera here real quick, Steve, and just show you, there's been 4 vehicles that have left already. 1 bus, 3 transport vans. There's 13 border patrol vehicles here on-site. 1 truck was actually just used To carry just the luggage of the illegals, the both of these tents that you can see are full.
That tent behind in the distance is full as well, and what they do is they take The single adult males, from West Sub Saharan Africa and from the Middle East and from, now we're hearing Syria as well, And they separate them out. They send the women and children first, and then they deal with them. But this is happening every single day. And one of the things that we haven't talked about is the fact that we're in Arizona. I'm gonna be with Carrie Lake later tonight.
This would not be happening in Arizona if Carrie Lake hadn't had the election stolen from her by Katie Hobbs. This is a direct result of that election theft.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kevin McCarthy's broken promises have left many disappointed. Rep. Matt Gaetz highlighted their shared experience of being misled by McCarthy, who never intended to follow through on his words. The Motion to Vacate remains unfulfilled. Watch the live coverage for more insights.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
Gaetz: McCarthy Hasn't Delivered on Promises @RepMattGaetz: “The thing we have in common? Kevin McCarthy said something to all of us at one point or another that he didn’t really mean and never intended to live up to.” #MotionToVacate Watch LIVE http://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #AmericasVoiceLive with @stevegrubershow here: https://rumble.com/v3mqfsa-americas-voice-live-10-3-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
My colleague from Oklahoma claims that not supporting Kevin McCarthy would cause chaos, but I disagree. Chaos is having $33 trillion in debt and a $2.2 trillion annual deficit. Chaos is not passing single subject spending bills and relying on continuing resolutions and omnibus bills. We need reforms that go beyond McCarthy's time in office, such as open amendments and a clear understanding of the budget. These changes would lead to legislative progress, even if it means sometimes losing or forming unexpected partnerships. The American people expect us to work hard and deliver, something Speaker McCarthy has failed to do. That's why I've called for his removal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My friend from Oklahoma says that my colleagues and I who don't support Kevin McCarthy would plunge the house and the country into chaos. Chaos is speaker McCarthy. Chaos is somebody who we cannot trust with their word. The one thing that the white house, House Democrats and many of us on the conservative side of the Republican caucus would argue is that the thing we have in common, Kevin McCarthy said something to all of us at one point or another that he didn't really mean and never intended to live up to. I don't think voting against Kevin McCarthy is chaos.
I think 33,000,000,000,000 in debt is chaos. I think that facing a $2,200,000,000,000 annual deficit is chaos. I think that not passing single subject spending bills is chaos. I think the fact that we have been governed in this country since the mid nineties by continuing resolution and omnibus is chaos. And the way to liberate ourselves from that is a series of reforms to this body that I would hope would outlast Speaker McCarthy's time here would outlast my time here and would outlast either of our majority's reforms that I have heard Some of the most conservative members of this body, fight for and some of the reforms that we've been battling for that I've even heard those And the democrat caucus say would be worthy and helpful to the house, like open amendments, like understanding what the budget is.
We have been out of clients with budget laws for most of my life, most of many of your lives. And by the way, if we did those things, if we had single subject bills, If we had an understanding on the top line, if we had open amendments, if we had trust and honesty and understanding, there would be times when my conservative colleagues and I We'd lose. Might be a few times when we'd win. There'd be times that we would form partnerships that might otherwise not be, really predictable in the American body politic, but the American people would see us legislating. These last few days, We've suspended the momentum that we had established the week earlier, where we were bringing bills to the floor, voting on them, Staying late at night working hard, that's what the American people expect.
It's something Speaker McCarthy hasn't delivered, and that's why I've moved to vacate the chair.
reSee.it AI Summary
California Governor Gavin Newsom's claim that the US has achieved unprecedented domestic oil production under President Joe Biden is refuted by ClimateDepot. According to them, some of President Trump's policies carried over and contributed to the current production levels, which were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of this production is a result of old oil and gas leasing. Watch the discussion on StinchfieldTonight with Grant Stinchfield.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
Refuting Gavin Newsom's Outrageous Claim About American Energy Independence The Great Reset author @ClimateDepot responds to California Gov. Gavin Newsom's claim that the United States has more domestic oil production under Joe Biden than at any other time in history. Morano says certain of President Trump's policies carried over that were collapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic. "A lot of this is still the old leasing of oil and gas and some of this production," Morano said. Watch LIVEhttp://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #StinchfieldTonight with @stinchfield1776 here: https://rumble.com/v3lw1cq-grant-stinchfield-tonight-show-9-29-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Interior Secretary is being criticized for celebrating high gas prices and inflation as a positive outcome for the environment. Gavin Newsom claims that we are more energy independent under Biden, but the oil and gas industry disagrees. While there has been an increase in domestic oil production, it is due to policies from the previous administration and not sustainable growth. The Biden administration has restricted the development of fossil fuels and limited funding for future projects, leading to higher energy prices. This is something that Gavin Newsom failed to acknowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's pretty remarkable story to have our Interior Secretary bragging in a time of once again record gas prices, once again record inflation, once again skyrocketing energy, that this is a good thing because the planet is smiling, Grant.
Speaker 1: All right. Let me play a clip from you from Gavin Newsom. This is after the debates. Gavin Newsom is talking about how we've achieved energy independence. This is cut 5, guys.
Let me run this for you. And then maybe you can refute his comments here.
Speaker 2: We are more independent today under Biden. Pence doesn't know that. Your audience doesn't know that. More domestic oil production than any time in history were on pace this year. That's a fact.
You guys keep making that up. No. We don't make it up. We're energy independent, and now we're not energy independent. No.
We're not energy exporters.
Speaker 1: I wish that people could have seen your face as you're watching him say those things. What is your response to Gavin
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, the actually oil and gas industry responded, refuting him. What he's doing is basically these are some of the Trump policies carried over that were collapsed when we had COVID. And a lot of this is just still the old leasing of oil and gas and some of this production. But to say that we still have the net energy export, it depends on what technical definition he's looking at because Fossil fuels have been not only restricted in terms of real time, in terms of development by the Biden administration, But more importantly, and this is what people don't realize and this is what Gavin Newsom completely ignored, the financing and funding through things like environmental and social governance and through the finance department of the United States Treasury, restricting money to these projects, making the future permits and future drilling, which then depresses the energy markets and then creates higher prices. This is what happens.
reSee.it AI Summary
A fight against biased prosecutors aiming to imprison Trump for 700 years. Lou Dobbs warns that America's future is at stake, urging Trump's re-election. He suggests Trump should be elected by acclamation. Watch the live coverage of Mike Lindell's Election Summit.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
A Fight Against a Stacked Deck, but, Still, a Fight Worth Having @LouDobbs says "a ludicrous bunch of low-lifes posing as prosecutors" want to throw President Trump in prison for 700 years. Dobbs tells Steve Bannon that Trump must win reelection or else America is in peril. He said Trump should be elected by acclamation. Watch LIVEhttp://bit.ly/plutorav Watch our LIVE #WarRoom coverage of @realMikeLindell’s Election Summit here: https://rumble.com/v389wa0-war-room-special-coverage-of-mike-lindells-election-summit-pm-8-16-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump has a strong support base in this country. He has been fighting against his opponents since 2016 and now faces the possibility of 700 years in prison. The prosecutors and judiciary involved in his case are seen as a ludicrous bunch. The challenges he faces include Wall Street, media oligarchs, tech oligarchs, and the unit party. This is a difficult battle, but it is worth fighting. If Trump doesn't win in 2024, there may not be another election according to the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who would anyone in this country supported by Donald Trump? This is a man who should be elected by acclamation. He has been fighting these SOBs, from 2016 on. And right now, I mean, 700 years of prison he faces. 700 years.
This is a ludicrous bunch of lowlights posing as prosecutors and part of our judiciary. You know what he's up against because you know Wall Street. Right? You're the lead financial guy seen in forever. You also to know the media oligarchs.
You know the tech oligarchs, and you know the unit party. That's a pretty stacked deck we're up against, Is it not that Donald Trump's been up against? Well, you know, there's some fights that are really worth fighting, and this is one of them. And I hope that everybody that watching you and listening to you, I mean, understand, this is a this is a for real deal. This, in my opinion, there won't be another election after 2024 if Donald Trump doesn't win.
And I mean that seriously.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
ICYMI: @MikeBenzCyber detailed how taxpayer-funded researchers devised stealth strategies to aid social media censorship Watch LIVE http://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #JustTheNewsNoNoise with @jsolomonReports and @AmandaHead here: https://americasvoice.news/video/66560/?related=playlist…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), funded by the US government, has been using taxpayer dollars to secretly censor conservative and heterodox opinions online. They conducted a social science censorship experiment using 23 million tweets labeled as misinformation from the 2020 election. EIP developed four censorship techniques, resulting in a 63% censorship rate without users knowing they were being censored. These techniques included covert follower loss for medium to large-sized influencers. The study, published in Nature Magazine, aimed to find ways to censor people without causing outrage or blowback for tech platforms. EIP received $1 million in taxpayer funding from the Biden administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new story is is just basically revealed out of the same network that John and Just the News have covered around this collective called the the Election Integrity Partnership or EIP, which was handpicked by the Department of Homeland Security to censor the 2020 election, and who then rebranded to censor the entire COVID nineteen pandemic, and who received, 1,000,000 of dollars of taxpayer funding from the Biden administration, has actually been working using, taxpayer dollars on secret censorship methods, again, funded by the US government, including virality circuit breakers, covert follower losses for medium to large follower sized accounts, and various kinds of information purgatory to place, largely conservative populist or, heterodox opinions in to stop them from going viral. So this study was published in Nature Magazine, which is widely heralded as the most, prolific and prestigious science magazine in the world, and it featured a, essentially, a social science censorship experiment using EIP's 23,000,000 tweet misinformation tweet corpus from the 2020 election. This is something that EIP had long denied that they had even done, collected 23,000,000 tweets and labeled them as misinformation. They recycled it for this study to run various kinds of AI experiments for how to censor people, using secret methods so that they wouldn't know they're being censored so that it wouldn't generate an outrage cycle.
And so that it'd be more palatable for the tech platforms who wouldn't get blowback because people wouldn't know they're being censored. And they they went they came up with 4 different censorship techniques that they bragged resulted in a 63% censorship rate without users knowing that they were being censored and they included things like covert follower loss to people around 50,000 followers, and they they tested different variables. What if we do this with 10,000 follower accounts, 50,000 follower accounts, 100,000 follower accounts, 500,000, they settled on the sweet spot to really go after medium to large sized influencers so that they could saturate the information zone online.
Mike Benz breaks news, the federal government's NIH funded research programs to censor Americans - Real America's Voice News
Real America's Voice News is your one stop news and entertainment network.
americasvoice.news
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
Crowd Breaks Out in Cheers of ‘USA, USA, USA!’ As Trump Crashed Wedding after D.C. Arraignment President Trump surprised attendees of a wedding on Thursday at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, NJ as the crowd broke into cheers of “USA, USA, USA!” #TrumpIndictment#TrumpArraignment @RealMirandaKhan@RealDrGina Watch LIVE http://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more here: https://americasvoice.news/video/66463/?related=playlist
Video Transcript AI Summary
At a wedding in Bedminster, New Jersey, Donald Trump made a grand entrance, capturing everyone's attention. Despite being the center of attention, he had a unique ability to make each person feel like they were the reason for the gathering. He was a warm and welcoming host, going around to each table, asking about dinner and recommending wines, even though he didn't drink himself. Trump's hospitality was unmatched, leaving a lasting impression on the wedding attendees.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And in true Trump form. Yeah. He crushed a wedding Yes. When he returned to his club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Watched the video posted to social media by wedding attendees.
Post. I think they're fans. What do you think? Yeah. I want the audience started to notice something that that I that I get to see a lot that I really just want to share with them really quickly, if I may.
And it is that He has the ability to walk in the room when clearly he's the center of attention and make you feel like You're the center of attention to make you feel like the reason everyone is gathered in the room is you and he I always always is the most warm host of anyone I've ever you know, I've been to a lot of people's pals as we all had at the time. Nobody makes you feel more welcome. He'll come over to the table, you know, how's your dinner? Did you what did you You have for dinner. Did you like the steak?
Did you find did they match you with he doesn't even drink wine. Do they match a good wine for you? He'll send wine to the table that he likes. He's the most gracious host you will ever
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
“Had the police not stopped this guy when they did, that child would have been killed and his organs would have been sold.” @JackPosobiec joins the War Room and talks about the horrific story out of Ukraine where a child trafficker was stopped at the border with an 11-month old baby with the intent of selling the child’s organs. Watch LIVE http://bit.ly/plutorav Watch more #WarRoom here: https://rumble.com/v2wvvqo-war-room-live-pm-show-6-28-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the issue of child trafficking in Ukraine. They mention a case where a trafficker was caught trying to sell an 11-year-old baby for its organs. The speakers emphasize that this is not an isolated incident and that there is an organized effort involved in child trafficking. They explain that the extreme poverty and desperation caused by the ongoing war in Ukraine make people vulnerable to these traffickers. The speakers also mention the involvement of black markets for organs in certain countries. They stress the importance of addressing this issue and ending the war to protect the people of Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jack, Jack has had a had to do some work during the commercial break. Jack, thank oh my gosh, there you are. What? Tanya Tay hurt, Tanya Tay heard the last segment, is that where is that where I am?
Speaker 1: Look, Tanya Tay is perfectly fine with the last segment. You see Steve, look, This is just because I'm wearing performance wear on air, that's because this is tactical, brother. Look, Antifa could be coming through that room Any minute, BLM could be out there, I gotta fly. You know, you're sitting there in the war room, you got the mantle, we go, we go where the story is.
Speaker 0: God, unbelievable. Okay, we got some serious work to do. Now, Kaviza was on here, Jack and you know Jim and you're close to him, you've been on top of this entire thing in the Ukraine. In fact, Jack is one of the few folks is on TV anywhere it's actually been to the front line in Ukraine, and quite dangerously went down to too close to Crimea. Jack, you've been disturbed about what's going on, and and getting to the bottom of this, whether the bioweapons labs, or because something doesn't make sense As we said at the beginning about why why are we fighting, why is the US in a proxy war 10,000 miles away between 2 Slavic entities On the Eastern Russian speaking border of, of, of Ukraine.
The but this and Jim Caviezel called the other day. He says, hey, part of this is that a big part of this is the trafficking of children, and particularly, he said the trafficking of babies, for parts. And a lot of people say, well, that's just Jim Caviezel, he's crazy, you know, he's been crazy since he did the passion of the Christ. The daily mail's breaking a story right now, and post millennials got it up. Walk me through what's going on about this trafficking of children out of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Steve, this is a horrific story, and when Jim Caviezel, and he's got the film out, Sound of Freedom now, Which is up, and the tickets are there, people are saying that, you know, this guy has seen too much, he's too close to it, there's no way, And, and I understand, because this is a level of evil, that people don't want to have to confront on a regular basis, because it's uncomfortable, but, And this this is a story that's cited from the national police of Ukraine. This is not some Russian source. It's not, some western source. It's the national it's the government of Ukraine putting this out, that a trafficker in that region of Ukraine Was stopped at the border, so this is the border between Ukraine and Slovakia, which is right next to the border of Ukraine and Hungary, just north of there, And, a human trafficker, a child trafficker was stopped at the border attempting to steal an 11 year old baby with the intent To sell its organs, now that baby was rescued and was returned to the mother, however, the authorities have been looking for this guy Because they have information that this is the 3rd or 4th time that he's done this, and had been able to sell Multiple babies from these refugee women And what they do, Steve, is that he walks up to these refugee women Because remember, the men Can't leave.
The men, the fathers are forced to stay because of martial law inside Ukraine. The they said they go to the women, it's understandable, they go to the women, the children, they say get out, get where you can be safe, the woman's going along but they need money, they're not getting money that they need, And along comes these traffickers, and they say, look, we are going to bring your child to safety, We're gonna bring him to him or her to a family in Western Europe, they're gonna be adopted, they're gonna be cared for, at the end What? They're gonna be doing much better And so what they're doing is they're hitting these vulnerable war refugees They're going after the children and on the and then they might even give the money up front, and it says in this instance in Transcarpathia there that he gave the woman's mother, the boy's mother, one 1,000 US dollars down payment said that he would offer a total of 5,000 The plan was to turn around sell the kid for 25 $1,000 this is an 11 month boy Ukrainian child little blonde haired kid. And I gotta say Steve, that's, you know, just looking at these pictures, it, it, it makes me think of my little boy at home, and, I mean, they could be brothers, you look at the 2 of them, and, Had the police not stopped this guy when they did, that child would have been killed and his organs would have been sold on the market For these traffickers, and what we need to understand is thank God and God bless, that this 1 trafficker was stopped, But you have to look at it from a perspective of scale.
When I was there, as you say, last year, my brother and I were at the train station at the Poland Ukraine border in Przybylsil, And this is exactly what we saw. Women traveling with children, lots of kids around, lots of babies around, People not knowing what was going coming next, not knowing where they were gonna get their next paycheck, not knowing where where they were gonna sleep at night, not knowing How they were gonna get their next meal, and then along comes somebody waving around 1,000 US dollars in front of you and saying, I can make all your problems go away, And I, and I can save your kid just come along with me, just get in the car, come right here These are the same types of situations that Throughout history have led to child trafficking, you saw this down with Haiti and the earthquake, you see this all across the Middle East with the trafficking that took place there, Of this of these migrants up to Europe, now we're seeing the exact same thing out of Ukraine, and unfortunately, the longer this War continues, the more of this is going on, and it's it's incumbent upon us, and I applaud Jim Caviezel for being out there and being willing to put his name out in front of it, Steve, we can't be silent about this stuff anymore because it is real, and it is happening.
Speaker 0: You've got you've got border crossings in Poland, border crossings in, I guess, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania, some of those are more popular to go through the than others. Do you think that There's a a organized effort. This guy's done a couple. Right? Do you think there's an organized effort in that maybe government authorities on both sides or Or somehow because when you talk about $1,000, the US currency goes a long way over there.
If you talk about $25,000 For a, for a a baby, a little boy. You do a couple of those, you there's a lot of money to spread around to do even more, is there not?
Speaker 1: Well that's exactly right Steve, because, okay, you can fire the 1 guy, but people need to understand that this guy is just the middle man. Okay. And they they actually show this very well in the Sound of Freedom movie. Now that takes place in Latin America, South America, but it's the same type of process, Where there's a recruiter that later sells someone to a trader, the trader then goes sells to someone who's either a publisher, or a Filmmaker or essentially a pimp of these kids, and then they work with traffickers that are involved in child pornography in the US From the digital, on the internet side, and that's where, that's where Tim Ballard's character catches them. But we have to understand, these are the up Stream implements of how the children are put into the pipeline, are funneled into the pipeline in the 1st place.
So just because you're catching the people That are doing the procurement end right here, those are low level. Okay? You need to go after the people that are, that are upstream, or I guess downstream in this case, From this situation, because okay, you knocked down a couple of these guys, guess what? They're gonna have 3, 4, 5 more people willing to do this Within minutes. Because people need to understand the extreme levels of poverty in this part of the world, the extreme levels of desperation caused by this war, the devastation That puts people in these situations in the 1st place.
It's one of the reasons that over at human events that I know here is at Worm as well, that we've Called for an immediate end to the war, an immediate call for peace because you're worried about the people of Ukraine that are caught in the middle. Not just talking about the missile strikes. We're talking about people that are put into situations like this, where mothers are selling their children, hoping the kids are going to a good place. And by the way, Steve, just because the guy says They're going to Western Europe. That doesn't mean that's where they're gonna end up.
A lot of them, they get put on boats, they're sent right into the Black Sea, then they're taken down to the Middle East, They're taken down, and they're gone. And that, by the way, unfortunately, in that region of the world, has a very very long history.
Speaker 0: Jack, I want to bring up another element of this, and this is where they really go after Caviezel hard, and he mentioned on our show a couple of times that it it, this is obviously this depravity, and the reason that the sex trafficking is higher margin business than the, Then the, drug trafficking is that these, women and these little children on the pedophilia can be used over and over again for the sex. This was specifically about parts, and this was that gets into this big controversy that they say, oh, you know, Caviezel is a nut, But here we've had confirmation. I mean, this is what I keep saying, but the queue, but the people all over the queue guys, all of these other people, they're all nuts, but Evidence keeps coming forward that maybe they're not so nutty. What was this guy, was he selling it to a research university? Who would buy, Purchase an 11 year old baby for parts, sir.
Speaker 1: Well, that's exactly what they're saying. It's They specifically say that they were looking to sell these children for organs. Some of it, by the way, and if you understand the way the laws on this work in different parts of the Middle East, it may have also been For and this this happens in China as well, if you understand how it goes there. It has to do with the legal organ transplants. And the idea that in some of these Countries, because they don't have the organ transplant banks like we do in the US, they don't have the controls, the regulations, the laws that we do in the US and in the West in general, there is essentially a black market for human organs, so the first thing they would do, of course, is check the blood type, they would check the age, they would check diseases, etcetera, and then they would go through and identify which organs people would need that would be most valuable on the black market in general, then you can get them to one of these countries in Central Asia or the Middle East, where they are able to perform one of these surgeries.
And you're going to be sold to some rich The mother. Some rich family who needs it.
Speaker 0: The the mother got the $1,000. What what is and what do we understand about what the Ukrainians are doing? Look these women are in terrible situations obviously, right? It's a war zone, I think 14 men have already tried to Have left the country, but I mean, what happens when you turn your you turn your child over to a stranger for a better life, But it's a $5,000 payment, he's gonna give you $1,000 down in cash. That transaction is problematic, is it not?
Speaker 1: Well, it is. And I think in this situation, because they did the the Ukrainian police did publish, and I'm looking right here. You can see it even in daily mail has this, and Ukraine, Ukrainian national police website has up in Ukrainian, when the child was returned to the mother, they're saying the mother didn't know, they're saying the mother thought it was sort of a A crisis adoption situation that the kid would be brought to one of these charity centers. And that really is the big problem because when you go and and we saw it last year in that Region, when you go to one of these border centers, Steve, it's bedlam there. There's there's each organization has a different kiosk, there's cars coming in, there's traffic, there's taxis all over the place, people saying come with me, come here, this is where you need to go, and then the next guy says, no, you come here, this is where you need to go, we're gonna offer this for that idiot worker, and if you're just coming off of one of these trains, you've got no idea who these people are.
You've got no idea who's legit and who's not. You've got people that could come in with fake IDs, with fake name tags, and say, hey, we're from, you know, the Red Cross, we're here to help, we're helping the children out, if you come with us, we'll take care of them. This is what they depict, by the way, in Sound of Freedom, in that case, they use a, it's like a, like a talent scouting agency, Where they say, oh, you're, you know, you really want your kids to be child models, and we're gonna take pictures of them, have them, you know, drop them off at the studio in the morning, and then when the dad comes to pick them up Later in the evening, they're gone. So in many of these cases, just as we've seen in other parts of the world, the parents are completely unwitting. They think The kid is going off to some great opportunity, and they don't even realize that they're actually handing their own children over to child traffickers.
@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)
.@SteveGruberShownotes the hypocrisy of the Left when it comes to justice: "It's damn good thing Hunter is not a Trump supporting grandma with cancer." Watch #SteveGruberShow LIVE, weekdays at 6am ET https://bit.ly/plutorav https://bit.ly/plutorav
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the controversial plea deal of Hunter Biden, son of President Biden. It is revealed that Hunter did not pay taxes of over $1.5 million in both 2017 and 2018, which appears to violate the Ashcroft memo. The speaker expresses disappointment in the plea deal, considering it a joke and a slap in the face to ordinary Americans. The investigations into bribery and money laundering allegations against Hunter and the president are still ongoing. On one side, left-leaning individuals defend the deal, while on the other side, there is anger and resentment. Journalist Catherine Harridge suggests that this plea agreement will be controversial, especially among Republicans. The speaker criticizes the double standard in the justice system, contrasting the treatment of Hunter Biden with that of a Trump-supporting grandmother who received prison time for a misdemeanor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Each year, 2017 and 2018, it appears he did not pay taxes of more than $1,500,000 each year. The deal appears to violate the so called Ashcroft memo that requires it requires the Department of Justice to charge the highest provable offense, And more importantly, to seek consistent sentences brought by the DOJ and that means these charges and the subsequent plea deal It's an absolute joke and a slap in the face to ordinary Americans like Kodak Black. Now this gives me almost no faith in the investigation of the bribes and money laundering allegations against both Hunter and the president, But those investigations are still ongoing. So what are people saying? Well, on the left, morons and hacks like Joe Scarborough and company and MSNBC are Crowing with Hunter got a fair deal, Republicans are just whiners and complainers when it comes to this sort of thing.
And on the other side, anger and resentment, because what we are witnessing is not acceptable. Catherine Harridge, who is actually a journalist alive in the wild, says the Hunter Biden deal is very controversial, and this not be the end of the story at all. Listen.
Speaker 1: I can tell you, having covered this for several years now, that this is likely to be a very controversial plea agreement, Especially with Republicans on Capitol Hill. Over the last few years, not only in the house, but in the senate, their investigators have raised very serious about these business deals with Chinese nationals as well as this Ukraine energy firm, Burisma. And then more recently, we've had whistle blowers Come forward, an IRS whistleblower spoke on the record with CBS News as well as whistleblowers from the justice department have gone to Capitol Hill complaining that this investigation has been slow walked and that standard investigative procedures have not been followed. So this may just be the beginning of the story in many respects.
Speaker 0: Could be the beginning of the story. So many guidelines, so many protocols, so many accepted standards of law enforcement ignored in this case. It's a damn good thing that Hunter is not a Trump supporting grandma with cancer because if he was and walked into the capitol to snap a couple of pictures, Well, you know, like a 69 year old woman in drug council convicted of a trespassing misdemeanor for being around on January 6th who got 4 months in prison. Nope. There's certainly not a 2 tier justice system in America.
It's just paranoid people screaming about conspiracy theories. They should be locked up
America's Voice News on Pluto TV
Your news, your opinions and your voice – its Americas Voice News
pluto.tv