TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RealJamesWoods

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 7:11 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

So ridiculous, but so funny no matter how hard you pretend it isn’t.

@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo

THIS WINS THE INTERNET TODAY, @Shawn_Farash!!!🇲🇽🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/cFz2GqHmdW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker calls the situation the 'Schumer shutdown' and the 'Schumer Siesta,' insisting 'we're not gonna let it happen' and vowing to 'end the siesta' and 'reopen the government.' He claims 'they put the government on Siesta to give illegal aliens your health care' and repeats 'There's no bueno.' He recalls 'l Hakimou Hefei Jeffries, we used to call him dollar store Obama till we realized, he's worth far less than a dollar.' He notes 'these are the greatest sombreros the world has ever seen' and says 'everybody wants one except Cryin' Chuck and, El Hakimo, Jefe Jeffries. They don't want one, but they're gonna wear one when all is said and done.' He adds 'we will not give in to the demands of Chuck and El Jefe.' 'Diolo Bendiga, and God bless America.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hola, me fellow Americanos. Means welcome to the Schumer shutdown. We call it the Schumer Siesta. Right? It's the Schumer Siesta. He put the government on Siesta, crying Chuck. And, l Hakimou Hefei Jeffries, we used to call him dollar store Obama till we realized, he's worth far less than a dollar. But they put the government on Siesta to give illegal aliens your health care. We're not gonna let it happen. I looked at both of them. I said, we're not gonna let it happen. There's no bueno. I said, there's no bueno. They begged me. They said, but senior, por favor, please give illegal aliens the healthcare. So we're not gonna do it. We're never gonna do it. It's not gonna happen. And they're also very upset about our big beautiful sombreros. You look at them. These are the greatest sombreros the world has ever seen. We really have the best sombreros, and, everybody wants one except Cryin' Chuck and, El Hakimo, Jefe Jeffries. They don't want one, but they're gonna wear one when all is said and done. We're gonna end the siesta. We're gonna reopen the government, and we will not give in to the demands of Chuck and El Jefe. We're not gonna do that. Thank you. God bless you. Diolo Bendiga, and God bless America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 3:24 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Andy has paid the price fighting the Democrat Party’s brownshirt thugs, ANTIFA. Quite frankly he’s lucky to be alive. Listen to this interview. It’s chilling. Chilling enough that you should arm yourself and get training. “They’re not going to stop.” https://t.co/B9mtwdFRnH

Video Transcript AI Summary
What needs to be done is their propagandas and lies has to be exposed. Just overnight, a mural for Charlie Kirk in Pensacola, Florida was vandalized with anti fraud propaganda on it. And some of the messages that left on it were the exact messages from what was engraved on the rifle cartridges that were used in the attack. So this is the mindset we're dealing with. It is I I will call it a death cult. They worship death. They want their targets killed, and they've been supported by a huge apparatus. We've seen many, many disgusting lies spread in the last few days in liberal media suggesting somehow that this accused gunman was a far right Christian nationalist inspired by MAGA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What needs to be done is their propagandas and lies has to be exposed. I think I hope that it's been eye opening for the public to see the bloodlust that exists not just on the fringe left, obviously, but also on the mainstream left in the aftermath of this assassination. It is a cancer that exists on the left and it's stream. And there's some data to back that up. Just overnight, a mural for Charlie Kirk in Pensacola, Florida was vandalized with anti fraud propaganda on it. And some of the messages that left on it were the exact messages from what was engraved on the rifle cartridges that were used in the attack. So this is the mindset we're dealing with. It is I I will call it a death cult. They worship death. They want their targets killed, and they've been supported by a huge apparatus. I'm not just talking about the black bloc militants who are on the streets as acting as thugs, carrying out arson attacks, and assaulting people. I'm talking about politicians who spread their propaganda and lies, NGOs, nonprofit groups, elected officials, and many in the Democrat Party and, of course, many journalists. We've seen many, many disgusting lies spread in the last few days in liberal media suggesting somehow that this accused gunman was a far right Christian nationalist inspired by MAGA.
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 3:38 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Will this hater have access to private financial information of customers whose politics he doesn’t like? Will he do damage and smile to himself and again say “they had it coming?” @BankofAmerica

@TruthHurtsTKV - TruthHurts

This is Jim Kramer, he thinks Charlie Kirk had it coming and he works for Bank of America. Use your first amendment right to tell them what you think! @BankofAmerica @iammissjinxed @sippicup2 @PigWar62030 https://t.co/ZxQ7qpNpRF

Saved - September 15, 2025 at 2:55 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Ten solid years of this by these monsters and their handmaidens in the media. It cost a father his life, but it will cost them their future. We have crossed the Rubicon. The Democrats must be held to account every single day. https://t.co/dqTPEWyt4V

Video Transcript AI Summary
No one has ever been more dangerous to this country than Donald Trump, and he is a fascist to his core. And shut down the city. We are at war. We're in a war right now. We are at war. So you have to be willing to do whatever is necessary in order to save the country. And that's why the gloves are off. Donald Trump and the mag of Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. And, yes, there are many threats to democracy. We see it with these extreme candidates. What the American public want is for us to bring actual weapons to the smart fight. This is an actual fight. You know, this is literally call to arms. The MAGA movement is a threat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one has ever been more dangerous to this country than Donald Trump, and he is a fascist to his core. Speaker 1: And shut down the city. We are at war. Speaker 0: We're in a war right now. We are at war. So you have to be willing to Speaker 2: do whatever is necessary in order to save the country. Speaker 1: And that's why the gloves are off. Speaker 0: Donald Trump and the mag of Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. Speaker 3: And, yes, there are many threats to democracy. We see it with these extreme candidates. Speaker 1: I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country, and maybe there will be. It could only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands. Speaker 0: What the American public want is for us to bring actual weapons to the smart fight. This is an actual fight. Speaker 1: You know, this is literally call to arms. Speaker 4: The MAGA movement is a threat. Speaker 1: But Michelle Wood Speaker 0: says that, you know, when they go low, we go up. No. With all due respect, if they go low, we don't go high. If they go low, we kick them. We take them to the mud and choke them out. Speaker 2: And make sure that they stay down. And and you know what? Kick them when they're down because they deserve it. Speaker 0: Get up in the face of some congress people. Speaker 5: We are gonna be in your face. Speaker 6: We are gonna be on your Speaker 0: We have to fight this in the streets. Speaker 2: We're gonna fight it in the streets. Speaker 0: It's time to step out of your comfort zone and step out into the streets. Speaker 1: To our republican colleague, if you do not see the light, we will bring the fire. Resist. Speaker 5: You and your little friend off of Twitter. Y'all about to find out. Speaker 4: And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, Speaker 7: in a department store, at a gasoline station, you Speaker 1: I'm not going to have a good return. He may not finish this term. Speaker 0: Yes. The last few days you woke up thinking there might be news. Just saying. Just saying. There will be news sometime. Just so you know. There
Saved - September 13, 2025 at 1:02 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Here is the roadmap to Charlie Kirk’s assassination… https://t.co/S4JPbPiFy8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Let me ask you tonight. Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist? Speaker 1: Yes. I do. Speaker 0: This is what kicking the shit out of fascism looks like. Speaker 2: Try to prevent the spread of the lawlessness and the fascist chaos that's been unleashed against us. Speaker 1: So when we say Donald Trump is a fascist, fascism, a huge component of fascism, is uniting racism, bigotry, a form of racist nationalism. Speaker 0: This is we are now living in a fascist dictatorship. Speaker 1: Mhmm. And we are worried about potential rise of fascism in this country. We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potentially fascist form of government. Speaker 0: Not only to roll over to Donald Trump's will, but to roll over our democracy and allow him to take over this country as a fascist dictator. Speaker 1: When fascism isn't just coming, it's already here. Speaker 0: The former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Mark Milley, said, no one has ever been more dangerous to this country than Donald Trump, and he is a fascist to his core.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you tonight. Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist? Speaker 1: Yes. I do. Speaker 0: This is what kicking the shit out of fascism looks like. Speaker 2: Try to prevent the spread of the lawlessness and the fascist chaos that's been unleashed against us. Speaker 1: So when we say Donald Trump is a fascist, fascism, a huge component of fascism, is uniting racism, bigotry, a form of racist nationalism. Speaker 0: This is we are now living in a fascist dictatorship. Speaker 1: Mhmm. And we are worried about potential rise of fascism in this country. We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potentially fascist form of government. Speaker 0: Not only to roll over to Donald Trump's will, but to roll over our democracy and allow him to take over this country as a fascist dictator. Speaker 1: When fascism isn't just coming, it's already here. Speaker 0: The former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Mark Milley, said, no one has ever been more dangerous to this country than Donald Trump, and he is a fascist to his core.
Saved - August 20, 2025 at 9:26 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

The best part is when she says she’s an “AG,” the arresting officer responds, “Good for you.”

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Sit back, relax, and watch the full video of drunk Rhode Island Special Assistant AG Devon Flanagan getting trespassed and arrested. She says, “I’m an AG,” as if that should get her off the hook. It doesn’t. Enjoy justice being served. https://t.co/GfrQ2HujZL

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a tense encounter, the speakers reference protocol: "Protocol is that you turn it off as a citizen request." They want to leave: "They want you guys to leave? Yes. Move out. Let's just leave. Let's just make it easy." They discuss trespass: "Trespass? Get him out." "You're trespassing, we gotta leave now." One person notes: "No. She's a lawyer." "She's a lawyer, so she knows." An authority retorts: "I'm an AG." They insist they're not being arrested: "No. I'm not being arrested." They request not to be handcuffed: "Please don't put your hands on us." The partner pleads: "I'm scared. I'm right here." They decide to leave: "We're leaving." They also say: "Please take my hands up. Please take the handcuffs." The exchange centers on protocol, the threat of removal, and fear during the departure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: want you Speaker 0: to turn Speaker 1: the body came off. Protocol is that you turn it off as a citizen request. It's a turn it off. She knows. Speaker 0: So they want you guys to leave? Yes. Move out. Let's just leave. Let's just make it easy. Okay? We're gonna Speaker 1: make it easy. I'm not you don't thought you don't thought Speaker 0: I am. Okay. I'm harassing. Speaker 1: The point. Can Speaker 0: you can you look at me? We'll talk over here. Okay? Speaker 1: Your protocol is Speaker 0: Can we can we all talk? Can we all talk? Talk over here. They want you to leave. Speaker 1: Portal Can was Speaker 0: we can we talk? Who is she to you? What's that? Speaker 1: No. She's a class. Speaker 0: Nothing. She is our college friend. Yes. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm not. Speaker 0: You guys just wanna know? Do you want him to trespass? Anything we can do. Yeah. Trespass? Yeah. I just need Trespass. Get him out. Please. No. Speaker 1: I'm not. Speaker 0: No. I'm not. Speaker 1: It's Do Speaker 0: you wanna Speaker 1: chat? I know that your protocol is Speaker 0: So you're trespassing, we gotta leave now. Unless you wanna be Speaker 1: in air. We're not trespassing. You haven't notified us that we're trespassing. Number one, no. Did I just say to you? You're trespassing. Let's go. Number one, number you guys. You're you're not gonna arrest us. Number two Speaker 0: is We gotta go. We gotta go. Speaker 1: Protocol is Let's meet them. Don't say what I'm do. If we ask you Speaker 0: to deal Speaker 1: with the body cam, don't wanna deal with this. Let's go. No. No. I understand you don't wanna deal with it, but the protocol is and your protocol is if I ask you to turn off the body cam, you have to turn it off. And that's your protocol. She's a lawyer, so she knows. Speaker 0: Well, that's lawyer stuff, so that's not true. So we gotta go. Speaker 1: No. It is. That's that's the law. I'm an AG. I'm an AG. Speaker 0: Good for you. I don't give a Let's go. We're going. It's Excuse We're leaving. I'm please don't We're leaving. Speaker 1: Please don't put your hands on us. Speaker 0: Can you get your children out of here? Like, I don't know why Speaker 1: I'm sorry. What? Speaker 0: Let's go. It's not Speaker 1: a stop. Speaker 0: I'm okay. Speaker 1: Let's go. No. Let's go. Leaving. Oh, because I'm wrong? You'll prob you have to Speaker 0: You relax. Sir. Sir. She's not doing anything wrong. Speaker 1: AG. She's leaving. I'm an AG. She's an AG? Speaker 0: Before AG? Honey, you're not she's not in the arrest. Let's go. Speaker 1: I'm not being arrested. You're putting me Speaker 0: in cuffs? Speaker 1: I'm not being arrested. Speaker 0: Weapons on you? No. Speaker 1: That's an Speaker 0: EG. Her badge is Speaker 1: your card. Speaker 0: I'm gonna get a badge. Let me tell you something. You're Buddy, get the hell out Speaker 1: of here. Speaker 0: Wait. Buddy, just seriously. Speaker 1: No. Resting in EG. Let me tell you something. Do you Speaker 0: wanna arrest her right now? No. Speaker 1: You're putting me in handcuffs, and you're Meringue You're not Meringue izing me. Speaker 0: Relax. Relax. No. No. No. I'm right here. I'm here. I'm right here. Here. Speaker 1: Come on. Babe? No. No. Speaker 0: I'm I'm Babe. Babe. Please. I'm scared. I'm right here. Please up to this. Please up to this. I'm not gonna find those. I'm right here. No. Okay. Speaker 1: No. Please go to the side, friend. I'm right here. No. No. Right No. Here. No. Babe. Babe. I'm right Speaker 0: here. Babe. I'm right here. Speaker 1: No. Babe. Relax. Relax. Relax. Speaker 0: No. Babe. What's wrong with Speaker 1: you? Relax. Speaker 0: We don't wanna put you on handcuffs. Let's go. Let's go. Speaker 1: No. Please. Listen. Speaker 0: You're making you're overreacting. You're adding chores. I'm overreacting. That's what Speaker 1: Please take my hands up. Please take the handcuffs. No. You're overreacting.
Saved - August 16, 2025 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion began with a claim about an insurance company canceling policies in a neighborhood. One participant suggested a conspiracy involving a "One World Order" aiming to establish military bases on the West Coast, asserting that devastating fires, like those in Santa Rosa, were caused by Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). They detailed how DEWs function, claiming they create extreme temperatures that incinerate structures while leaving nearby areas untouched. A fire survivor shared personal experiences, noting the destruction of concrete slabs while other materials remained intact, and expressed interest in further information on related technologies.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Actually one of the major insurances companies canceled all the policies in our neighborhood about four months ago.

@SavvymanWyo - Rick Saxton

Looks like people panicking, and end up blocking roads, wrecking, cars stacked up and abandoned . Doesn’t look good for those who live there. Im wondering if insurance companies will treat them better than those that got flooded out and lost their homes in the east US, Appalachia area?

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

@RealJamesWoods James, this was all planned, the One World Order 'will have' the entire west coast for military base as I was read in on in 2017 during the Santa Rosa DEW attack that burned only the homes, not the trees. They want all humans gone. There will be NO rebuilding, you'll see. https://t.co/N3fPmY5Zl9

@RoxanneSor53521 - Roxanne Soroko

@iontecs_pemf @RealJamesWoods Why do they need so many miles of M base please?

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

@RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods America is set to become the mil fortress of the entire world so the beach heads have to be armored. The One World Order is going to enforce the greatest draconian measures ever seen in modern history. 1984 will look like a picnic.

@katsmit403 - Kat

@iontecs_pemf @RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods The kill box… https://t.co/UCksxjn9pn

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEWs) While typical civilian access to DEW technology is hyper limited, AI gives more insight into the reality of Directed Energy Weapons as used in combat. However, this is not a very comprehensive snapshot of what DEW munitions really are. First, they are not lasers, but rather known as sasers (sound outside of human audible range) that delivers more than just excited photons as per lasers, but envelopes microwave radiation delivered through linear particle accelerators and amplified by square-wave (jackhammer) ultrasonic concussion exceeding 20,000 pulses per second, where each impact doubles in energy through secondary emissions for every pulse. Secondary emissions are created on-the-spot through Neutrino Events that harvests brand-new energy directly out of atmospheric neutrinos, turning them into new ions. Hence why saser beams deliver more energy to the target than anything short of a nuclear blast. DEWs also actively draw energy out of surrounding capacitors at the scene of the target as well as from local sources in the path of the beam. Microwaves excite the electrons within the target structure, such as car batteries and the electric wires inside homes, that causes additional increase in amplitude. Since the energy being siphoned off is focused in the zero point of the beam, that area creates dual opposing twin vortices at zero target forming a hyperbola in the center of the affected area where the energy collapses in on itself, sucking oxygen out of the air which then amplifies the thermal radiation only within that toroidal vortex area, achieving crucible-level temperatures in an open-air setting. This is hyper-accelerated by the coupling of the SBX-1 mobile Vortex generator that delivers oxygen to the strike zone with hyper-focused accuracy at up to 70+ MPH winds. Which is why target zones see hurricane winds out of nowhere and from clear skies without any clouds. DEWs generate temperatures that are vastly higher than normal house or forest fires; 1200F and 1500F respectively. A self-imploding DEW saser strike can generate thermal signatures high enough to burn terracotta roofing tiles (2100F), melt glass (2900F), and vaporize stucco walls that are rated to hold up for 1 HOUR under direct torch flame, rendering it to tiny traces of powder. Even the concrete slab foundations of homes in the Santa Rosa fire of 2017 had been incinerated and literally gone as if evaporated into the air. Since the air surrounding the strike zone becomes immediately depleted, fire will not be readily sustained anywhere outside of the hyperbola area (just the home or automobile), leaving brush, trees, plastic, within just a few feet away barely seared and, in many cases, totally unscathed altogether. Houses that incinerate all the way down to ash within minutes will leave no soot, or flame marks on white-painted homes as little as ten feet away as if there was no heat or fire present of any kind. It is important to note that a normal house fire takes 3-4 hours to burn down, leaving large portions of the home and contents behind unconsumed. DEW crucible vortex fires consumed homes down to nothing but white ash in Santa Rosa, incinerated within 20 minutes that I observed after pounding on doors in one residential neighborhood of 2 story homes at 2:30 in the morning screaming to get out, then returning to that same location less than a half hour later, with nothing left but smoldering ash. There is nothing ‘normal’ about DEW remains. Kitchen stoves, pots and pans, washers, dryers, water heaters simply vanished. The cast-iron engines in cars just gone with their aluminum alloy wheels and windows melted on the street. Since DEW sasers work through the delivery of microwaves (that are radioactive) through encapsulation within tachyons (like protective bubbles), the resulting debris fields of target areas are also left contaminated, similar to the aftermath of nuclear detonation sites. The sites where homes once stood in the Santa Rosa fire for instance, had to have the soil under the vaporized concrete slabs excavated and stored in radiation containment casks before any new construction could resume, as reported by locals there that were involved in the cleanup. The Lahaina target homes in Maui are still blocked off with absolutely no entrance for any reason for this same reason almost a year and a half later. DEWs have been seen pulling massive arcs from lightning strikes, obviously generated by the extreme excitation of atmospheric particles of the beam, as well as from overhead electrical wires that supercharge the phonon shafts that are invisible to the naked eye unless backlit from flame or sparks. This technology has been shown to cut full size military ships in half from high altitude delivery systems in seconds, rendering all previous forms of explosive armaments, including nuclear warheads, obsolete. All the military weapons delivered from the US and other countries to Ukraine in recent years were outdated and considered unusable in a genuine modern conflict and were therefore literally being disposed of to make room for other, newer forms of weaponry in armories here at home. In other words, they were merely junk. US dark and black ops have had functioning DEW assault systems in place for many decades already. While AI admits to Turkey using them in combat in 2019, the real date of deployment of DEWs goes back more than just centuries, but prior to humans' arrival to earth in 560m BC. A recent use of DEWs shown here from the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. An even more recent DEW ‘Tara Cleansing’ as they’re called, was the Great San Francisco Fire of 1906 that was blamed on a 7.9 earthquake. And yes, the HAARP SBX-1 hurricane generator is also an earthquake generator as well. None of this is new tech, just new to you. Satellite and antigravity drone delivery of such weapons are entirely remotely-controlled, placing no mil soldiers' lives on the line to mount a siege, making military battlefield loss of life virtually a thing of the past at this time. VIDEO: DEW ATTACK PACIFIC PALISADES 1/8/25 gratis @kylezink

@PepesFanGirl - Apu'sFanGirl 💚

@iontecs_pemf this was so well explained 👏 2018 Fire survivor here and yes the concrete slabs were gone. One neighbor had this hideous blue driveway that was untouched ( it didn't fit our decor for the area )🌲. They absolutely dug up our lots super deep. They wouldn't let us in for weeks due sudden rain and fears of mud slides. It was hard sludge by the time we got there to look for anything that may have made it. Here's a weird anomaly Our concrete pad was destroyed, but the driveway ( asphalt) was intact. Significantly different temps for melting point. We have melted strips of steel from our Jeeps. Glass vases collected from abroad were melted. I need to find information on the Smart meters. I've missed this possibility as well. I'm sorry you went through this as well. This war is personal for many of us. Thanks for explaining this so well.

Saved - August 16, 2025 at 1:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion emerged about insurance companies canceling policies in a neighborhood, leading to claims of a planned agenda by a "One World Order" to use the West Coast as a military base. Participants discussed Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs), detailing their destructive capabilities and how they allegedly caused selective destruction in past fires, such as in Santa Rosa. The conversation also touched on the role of smart meters in targeting homes for destruction, with some suggesting that certain homes were spared based on affiliations.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Actually one of the major insurances companies canceled all the policies in our neighborhood about four months ago.

@SavvymanWyo - Rick Saxton

Looks like people panicking, and end up blocking roads, wrecking, cars stacked up and abandoned . Doesn’t look good for those who live there. Im wondering if insurance companies will treat them better than those that got flooded out and lost their homes in the east US, Appalachia area?

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

@RealJamesWoods James, this was all planned, the One World Order 'will have' the entire west coast for military base as I was read in on in 2017 during the Santa Rosa DEW attack that burned only the homes, not the trees. They want all humans gone. There will be NO rebuilding, you'll see. https://t.co/N3fPmY5Zl9

@RoxanneSor53521 - Roxanne Soroko

@iontecs_pemf @RealJamesWoods Why do they need so many miles of M base please?

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

@RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods America is set to become the mil fortress of the entire world so the beach heads have to be armored. The One World Order is going to enforce the greatest draconian measures ever seen in modern history. 1984 will look like a picnic.

@katsmit403 - Kat

@iontecs_pemf @RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods The kill box… https://t.co/UCksxjn9pn

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEWs) While typical civilian access to DEW technology is hyper limited, AI gives more insight into the reality of Directed Energy Weapons as used in combat. However, this is not a very comprehensive snapshot of what DEW munitions really are. First, they are not lasers, but rather known as sasers (sound outside of human audible range) that delivers more than just excited photons as per lasers, but envelopes microwave radiation delivered through linear particle accelerators and amplified by square-wave (jackhammer) ultrasonic concussion exceeding 20,000 pulses per second, where each impact doubles in energy through secondary emissions for every pulse. Secondary emissions are created on-the-spot through Neutrino Events that harvests brand-new energy directly out of atmospheric neutrinos, turning them into new ions. Hence why saser beams deliver more energy to the target than anything short of a nuclear blast. DEWs also actively draw energy out of surrounding capacitors at the scene of the target as well as from local sources in the path of the beam. Microwaves excite the electrons within the target structure, such as car batteries and the electric wires inside homes, that causes additional increase in amplitude. Since the energy being siphoned off is focused in the zero point of the beam, that area creates dual opposing twin vortices at zero target forming a hyperbola in the center of the affected area where the energy collapses in on itself, sucking oxygen out of the air which then amplifies the thermal radiation only within that toroidal vortex area, achieving crucible-level temperatures in an open-air setting. This is hyper-accelerated by the coupling of the SBX-1 mobile Vortex generator that delivers oxygen to the strike zone with hyper-focused accuracy at up to 70+ MPH winds. Which is why target zones see hurricane winds out of nowhere and from clear skies without any clouds. DEWs generate temperatures that are vastly higher than normal house or forest fires; 1200F and 1500F respectively. A self-imploding DEW saser strike can generate thermal signatures high enough to burn terracotta roofing tiles (2100F), melt glass (2900F), and vaporize stucco walls that are rated to hold up for 1 HOUR under direct torch flame, rendering it to tiny traces of powder. Even the concrete slab foundations of homes in the Santa Rosa fire of 2017 had been incinerated and literally gone as if evaporated into the air. Since the air surrounding the strike zone becomes immediately depleted, fire will not be readily sustained anywhere outside of the hyperbola area (just the home or automobile), leaving brush, trees, plastic, within just a few feet away barely seared and, in many cases, totally unscathed altogether. Houses that incinerate all the way down to ash within minutes will leave no soot, or flame marks on white-painted homes as little as ten feet away as if there was no heat or fire present of any kind. It is important to note that a normal house fire takes 3-4 hours to burn down, leaving large portions of the home and contents behind unconsumed. DEW crucible vortex fires consumed homes down to nothing but white ash in Santa Rosa, incinerated within 20 minutes that I observed after pounding on doors in one residential neighborhood of 2 story homes at 2:30 in the morning screaming to get out, then returning to that same location less than a half hour later, with nothing left but smoldering ash. There is nothing ‘normal’ about DEW remains. Kitchen stoves, pots and pans, washers, dryers, water heaters simply vanished. The cast-iron engines in cars just gone with their aluminum alloy wheels and windows melted on the street. Since DEW sasers work through the delivery of microwaves (that are radioactive) through encapsulation within tachyons (like protective bubbles), the resulting debris fields of target areas are also left contaminated, similar to the aftermath of nuclear detonation sites. The sites where homes once stood in the Santa Rosa fire for instance, had to have the soil under the vaporized concrete slabs excavated and stored in radiation containment casks before any new construction could resume, as reported by locals there that were involved in the cleanup. The Lahaina target homes in Maui are still blocked off with absolutely no entrance for any reason for this same reason almost a year and a half later. DEWs have been seen pulling massive arcs from lightning strikes, obviously generated by the extreme excitation of atmospheric particles of the beam, as well as from overhead electrical wires that supercharge the phonon shafts that are invisible to the naked eye unless backlit from flame or sparks. This technology has been shown to cut full size military ships in half from high altitude delivery systems in seconds, rendering all previous forms of explosive armaments, including nuclear warheads, obsolete. All the military weapons delivered from the US and other countries to Ukraine in recent years were outdated and considered unusable in a genuine modern conflict and were therefore literally being disposed of to make room for other, newer forms of weaponry in armories here at home. In other words, they were merely junk. US dark and black ops have had functioning DEW assault systems in place for many decades already. While AI admits to Turkey using them in combat in 2019, the real date of deployment of DEWs goes back more than just centuries, but prior to humans' arrival to earth in 560m BC. A recent use of DEWs shown here from the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. An even more recent DEW ‘Tara Cleansing’ as they’re called, was the Great San Francisco Fire of 1906 that was blamed on a 7.9 earthquake. And yes, the HAARP SBX-1 hurricane generator is also an earthquake generator as well. None of this is new tech, just new to you. Satellite and antigravity drone delivery of such weapons are entirely remotely-controlled, placing no mil soldiers' lives on the line to mount a siege, making military battlefield loss of life virtually a thing of the past at this time. VIDEO: DEW ATTACK PACIFIC PALISADES 1/8/25 gratis @kylezink

@kurtlloyd - Kurt Lloyd

@iontecs_pemf @katsmit403 @RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods Any idea if "smart meters" are used to help drive these fires?: https://t.co/NtsN5jWp4B

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨🇺🇸 Some Los Angeles Residents are reporting that Houses without Smart Meters remain totally unscathed vs neighbours only yards away from them ‼️ https://t.co/gKpU4wJovF

Video Transcript AI Summary
So I talked to the owner of this house right here in Pasadena. I talked to the owner. The owner does not have a smart meter on this house, on the front part of his house. There's no smart meter. No smart meter. So So the house did not burn. The back house is the part of the house that had the smart meter, and everything in the back of his house is burnt. No smart meter. Smart meter. No smart meter. Nothing. Nothing's burned. All the trees, but the house state is perfectly fine. But the back house is completely gone, and that's
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I talked to the owner of this house right here in Pasadena. I talked to the owner. The owner does not have a smart meter on this house, on the front part of his house. There's no smart meter. No smart meter. So So the house did not burn. The back house is the part of the house that had the smart meter, and everything in the back of his house is burnt. No smart meter. Smart meter. No smart meter. Nothing. Nothing's burned. All the trees, but the house state is perfectly fine. But the back house is completely gone, and that's

@iontecs_pemf - W.R. Schock, QBD

@kurtlloyd @katsmit403 @RoxanneSor53521 @RealJamesWoods Yes, smart meters send up a signal to the drones for the homes that are to be eliminated. We saw that all over Santa Rosa attack. The houses left standing are presumed to be Freem@son homes.

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 4:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a user questioning Obama's origins and suggesting he is a Trojan horse. Another user shares a link, and a third user provides a link to a complete article for further reading.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Well, where did Obama come from? These characters are Trojan horses.

@RealCalvin1 - Calvin

Where did Mamdani even come from? I followed politics for years and he seems to have come out of nowhere and leading all the polls? Something is off there.

@WarNuse - WarNuse

@RealJamesWoods https://t.co/bMR7qP16Bp

@marsha_hodgson - Marsha Hodgson

@WarNuse @RealJamesWoods Here's the complete article, if anyone wants to read it... https://t.co/IkUu2gDu2g

Saved - July 29, 2025 at 1:03 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Seriously how do people who work at CNN sleep at night? https://t.co/Miqc7fGkHm

Video Transcript AI Summary
A picture of a male, possibly white, wearing sunglasses and a mustache, has been distributed to every police officer in New York City, particularly to search teams inside the building. This is to identify the individual among groups of people being evacuated. The goal is to prevent the person from slipping out with victims or office workers during the evacuation. They want to avoid a situation where the individual escapes within a cordon while people are being moved to a safe corridor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who he is? They do not know who he is. They know he is a male, possibly white. He's wearing sunglasses. He appears to have a mustache. And that picture has been distributed to every police officer in New York City, particularly has been sent to the phones of the search teams inside that building because whenever they encounter a group of people, the first thing they have to figure out is, is that individual among these people hiding among victims or pretending to be an office worker? Because one thing you don't wanna have happen is to have this kind of cordon where you're trying to evacuate people in groups as you can get them to a safe corridor and have this person slip out with them. So Yep. Yes, they have the picture and and they have distributed to everybody on the scene. Alright. Alright. John, stay with me. I know you're obviously getting information here in real time as we're talking.
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 12:17 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

The Director of National Intelligence has just has just lit a match to the dumpster fire of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s now sad legacies. https://t.co/cFb3rQStuM

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 6:22 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

All part of a bigger plan. There, I’ve said it. I had held back, but when Newscum announced the $101,000,000 plan to destroy the Palisades with crime box buildings, I just don’t care anymore. Does anyone think this wasn’t planned to some degree all along? https://t.co/tyzHJ2vOpq

Saved - July 6, 2025 at 12:16 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

This held up about as well as the lying clown who was spouting it. How did leftist Democrats manage to close this entire country down with lie after lie after lie, and do so with no resistance from the right? https://t.co/KXY9PXOcUW

Video Transcript AI Summary
People should get vaccinated when it is their turn and help family, friends, and neighbors get vaccinated as well. If people do their part together, by July, there is a good chance families and friends will be able to get together in their backyard or in their neighborhood and have a cookout and celebrate Independence Day. This does not mean large events, but it does mean small groups will be able to get together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I need you to get vaccinated when it's your turn and when you can find an opportunity and to help your family, your friends, your neighbors get vaccinated as well. Because here's the point. If we do all this, if we do our part, if we do this together, by July, there's a good chance you, your families, and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout and a barbecue and celebrate Independence Day. That doesn't mean large events with lots of people together, but it does mean small groups will be able to get together.
Saved - July 4, 2025 at 1:05 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

She’s gone. https://t.co/dAz85SyZ0e

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2009, Ilhan Omar allegedly married her biological brother, Ahmed Saeed Almi, so he could legally remain in the US and attend college, according to Abdul Haqim Osman, a member of the Minneapolis Somali community. At the time, Omar was religiously married to Ahmed Hirsi, but there was no Minnesota state record of the marriage. This marriage to her brother would allow him to get legal immigration documents. Osman also provided the name of the Christian minister who married Omar and her brother. The minister reportedly does not want to be involved or interviewed about Omar. When Representative Omar was first confronted with the allegation, she called it absurd and then went silent, refusing to comment, citing her privacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was first made a few years ago, congresswoman Elon Omar tried to knock it down by calling it absurd. Then when the media turned up a wedding certificate, Omar went silent, refusing to make any comments at all, saying she does not talk about her family or personal life. Well, now others are talking, like Abdul Haqim Osman, a prominent member of the Minneapolis Somali community, who is now on the record telling the Daily Mail that in 02/2009, Ilan Omar married her biological brother, Ahmed Saeed Almi, so that he could legally remain in The US and attend college. At the time, Omar was married to Ahmed Hirsi, but it was a religious marriage, meaning there was no Minnesota state record stating that she and Hirsi were husband and wife, and so marrying her brother would allow her sibling to get his legal immigration documents. But mister Osman isn't just saying that Omar married her biological brother. He also gave the Daily Mail the name of the Christian minister who married them. That minister reportedly says she does not wanna be involved or interviewed about congresswoman Omar.
Saved - July 4, 2025 at 1:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
William Alfred Newsom III, born in 1934 in San Francisco, was a judge and attorney known for managing the Getty family's $2 billion trust. A close friend of Gordon Getty, he played a role in advising Getty Oil and was involved in the ransom delivery during Paul Getty III's kidnapping in 1973. His legal career included positions on the Placer County Superior Court and the California Court of Appeal, appointed by Jerry Brown. While his personal net worth is not documented, his connections to the Getty family imply he had access to significant wealth.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Per Grok: “William Alfred Newsom III, born 1934 in San Francisco, was a judge and attorney who managed the Getty family's $2 billion trust. A close friend of Gordon Getty, he advised Getty Oil and delivered ransom for Paul Getty III's 1973 kidnapping. His legal career included roles on the Placer County Superior Court and California Court of Appeal, appointed by Jerry Brown. His personal net worth is undocumented, but his Getty ties suggest significant wealth access. Exact figures remain unclear.”

@adamcarolla - Adam Carolla

Look up who Gavins dad was

@TheKevinDalton - Kevin Dalton

Gavin Newsom gets emotional talking about the hallway his sister slept in because they only had one bedroom, the 2 1/2 jobs his mom worked, the couch he had to sleep on because again one bedroom, and the spare bedroom they rented out because… Gavin can’t keep his lies straight

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses a strong emotional connection to the issue of affordability, stemming from personal experiences. This includes living in cramped conditions with a sister in a makeshift bedroom, sleeping on a couch, and a mother working multiple jobs while renting and subletting a room. The speaker emphasizes that this emotional attachment to affordability is genuine and deeply felt by many.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very emotionally attached, to this reality. I can extend the same, with a sister who quite literally lived in a cutout of, the hallway because we didn't have more than one bedroom, where I slept on the couch, where the mom was working two almost three jobs, two and a half jobs, in renting, and then rented out a spare bedroom for most of my childhood. The emotional attachment to the issue of affordability is real and raw and for too many people.
Saved - June 27, 2025 at 8:28 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Once you squeeze the toothpaste out of the tube, you can’t get it back in. This Mamdani character will be a turning point of cataclysmic proportions.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Zohran Mamdani “In this city, we have a million Muslims — when you go and vote, remember, it is our opportunity to show that Muslims don't just belong in New York City, we belong in City Hall too” Sharia Law is LITERALLY right around the corner in America https://t.co/S9bkiy8cc4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges the audience to vote, stating that early voting starts tomorrow and continues until election day on June 24. They believe New Yorkers want consistency, principles, and a belief in humanity. The speaker notes that while there are a million Muslims in the city, with 200,000 registered as Democrats, only 7% voted in the last election. They feel there is an opportunity this year, stating they began the race at 1% and are now 2% sure of winning. They believe they have the support of people across the city. The speaker asks the audience to inform everyone they know about the election and what's on the ballot, emphasizing that Muslims deserve equality and respect. They state that these things must be won, particularly at the ballot box, to show that Muslims belong in City Hall.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The pressure. No matter the attacks, I will not move on those principles. And I tell you, brothers and sisters of this masjid, that we have an opportunity starting tomorrow for early voting until election day on June 24. An opportunity to show that New Yorkers want that consistency. They want those principles. They want a belief in humanity. And in this city, we have a million Muslims. 200,000 of us are registered as Democrats. But in the last election, only 7% of us voted. Now I will not judge anyone in our community because often it feels like there's not much to vote for. But this year, we have an opportunity. We have an opportunity. And I can tell you, I began this race at 1%, and today, I am just 2% sure going able that. But But I know that I have something they do not have, which is the support of people across this. So I ask you to tell everyone in your life that this election is here, to tell them what's on the ballot, and to tell them that we as Muslims deserve what every other community deserves, equality and respect. But we know that in this city and in this country, we are not going to be given those things. We have to win those things. And one way we win them is at the ballot box. So I ask you, when you go and vote, remember, it is our opportunity to show that Muslims don't just belong in New York City. We belong in City Hall too. Thank you so much. Come Speaker 1: on. You forgot you're in the mosque? You forgot you're in the masjid? What's going on? Just Speaker 0: one
Saved - June 25, 2025 at 1:52 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

You don’t care about this person or these issues or anything but your own ruthless ambition. Get back on your knees where you started your career and shut up. #Hypocrite #HeelsUpHarris

@KamalaHarris - Kamala Harris

Absolutely heartbreaking. Summer Taylor was only 24-years-old, peacefully protesting for Black Lives Matter when they were struck by a car. Thinking of their family during this difficult time and everyone in the movement today. https://t.co/i7hqkjSSMH

Saved - June 9, 2025 at 10:23 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Nice job, Venceremos Brigadier Bass. https://t.co/Gzj90xTLbU

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 3:08 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

For this alone I wish Trump could serve three more terms! https://t.co/4SlDKyG1tj

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 7:39 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Why did Biden and his criminal cohorts put illegal aliens in luxury hotels on the taxpayers’ dollar rather than await their hearings in an ICE detention center. The answer will enrage you. https://t.co/vpK2IDV1rp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Biden administration released millions into the U.S. interior instead of using ICE detention beds to manipulate the asylum process for political gain. They suggest ICE detention leads to quicker hearings and deportations, while releasing individuals into hotels delays hearings for up to nine years, increasing the likelihood of amnesty under a future Democratic administration. The speaker asserts this is a strategy to secure future political power by granting amnesty to millions. They state that the law mandates detention for those arriving without proper documentation, which they claim President Trump was doing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know why you know why the Biden administration released millions of people in The United States? No one ever talks about it. I'll talk about it. Why did they release people into the interior United States and put them rather than put them into an ice bed? Why not put them in an empty ice bed at a hundred and $27 a night rather than a hotel room at $500 a night? They did it on purpose. Because when you put them in ice detention bed, they get a hearing in thirty five days. Court records show nine out of ten people claim asylum, get order removal, they're gone. But if you release them and put them a hotel room at $500 a night, their hearings could be five, seven, nine years where you pull out all appeals. And what are they hoping for then? That another democratic administration's in power. They can warrant amnesty to millions. This is about selling this country off for future political power. That's what it was. The law clearly says, if you arrive at our border without proper documentation, you shall be detained. Not maybe, not thinking about it, shall. And that's what president Trump's doing. Catching leases over. That's what the law
Saved - April 28, 2025 at 8:59 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Friendly reminder that monsters walk among us. https://t.co/prvBMQTvsd

@ILA_NewsX - I Love America News

@RealJamesWoods This really puts it in perspective. https://t.co/NeJg5Ug4UY

Saved - April 22, 2025 at 3:01 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Nancy Pelosi caught in the headlights… https://t.co/PAdctFA9tA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is asked about accepting and participating in a large Visa IPO deal in February while serving as Speaker of the House, given pending legislation affecting credit card companies. The questioner asks if the speaker believes it was appropriate to accept a favorable stock deal and whether it constituted a conflict of interest or the appearance thereof. The speaker denies any conflict of interest, stating it only appears so if based on a false premise. They deny acting upon an investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you why you and your husband back in February, accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. At a time, there was major, legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the, through the house. And did you consider that to be a conflict of interest? The yeah. I I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that? Well, I I I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a speaker to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal? Well, we did. And if you participated in the IPO Well, I have made And at the time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or have the appearance of a conflict of interest. It only has appearance if you decide that you're going to have a a a elaborate on a false premise. But it it it's not true, and that's that. I don't understand what part's not true. Yes, sir. That that I would act upon an investment. Yes.
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 11:00 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Weasel slithering out of yet another gaffe of his.

@mazemoore - MAZE

2007. Mayor Gavin Newsom apologizes for having an affair with secretary. She was the wife of his good friend and Deputy Chief of Staff Alex Tourk. He confronted Newsom and resigned the day before this press conference. https://t.co/GJnfHkf6Fn

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to make it clear that everything you've heard and read is true, and I'm deeply sorry. I hurt someone I care deeply about, Alex Turck, and his friends and family, and I am deeply sorry. I am also sorry that I've let the people of San Francisco down. I am committed to restoring their trust and confidence. I will work very hard in the upcoming months to make sure that the business of running the city is framed appropriately. I also want to extend a personal apology to everyone in our administration, to my staff, to my friends, and my family members. I am deeply sorry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you all for coming here in short notice. Wanna make it clear that everything you've heard and read is true, and I'm deeply sorry about that. I've heard someone I care deeply about, Alex Turck and his friends and family, and that is something that I have to live with and something that I am deeply sorry for. I am also sorry that I've let the people of San Francisco down. They expect a lot of their mayor, and my personal lapse of judgment aside, I am committed to restoring their trust and confidence, and we'll work very hard in the upcoming months to make sure that the business of running the city is framed appropriately. I also want to extend a personal apology to everyone in our administration, to my staff that I just met with, to my friends, and my family members. I am, deeply sorry.
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 7:34 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Before Kristallnacht the Nazis pumped up hate using their Brownshirt propagandists.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Flashback to Lincoln Project cofounder Rick Wilson in 2023: "They're still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump." The mainstream media has the audacity to say that Trump's rhetoric incites violence. https://t.co/8mr21HhgU7

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 12:12 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Watching Stephen Miller field dress the carcass of this poor liberal lap dog is entertainment of the highest order. https://t.co/R5omj0qTXt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration believes the president has the constitutional right to conduct national security operations, citing the Alien Enemies Act. They argue a district court judge cannot interfere with the president's authority to repel an alien invasion or foreign terrorist, as this is a Title 50, commander-in-chief authority. The administration claims Tren de Aragua (TDA) is an alien enemy force sent by the Venezuelan government, triggering the Alien Enemies Act, which allows the president to act against invasions or predatory incursions directed by a foreign government. They state the president's decisions as commander in chief are not subject to judicial review. The administration maintains there is no conflict between the judge's order and the actions of the Departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security. They argue a district court cannot restrain the president's authority under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct foreign affairs, such as bilateral security agreements. They also claim the judge's order put lives at risk by interfering with flight operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you called the judge's order just earlier today, quote, patently unlawful, end quote, and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order, and might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out? Speaker 1: The president of The United States and his administration reserve all rights under the constitution to conduct national security operations and defense The United States. The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of The United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, restrict, or to restrain any way. You can read the law yourself. There's not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review. Speaker 0: So, Steven, when you when you say that this person has no authority at all, this is how our system works. It starts with these judges and then continues up. At what point does it become, in your view, legal for the justice system to be looking at this and making a judgment and I I I fail to see how there's any other way but to start with where we're starting here before you get to eventually the supreme court. Speaker 1: Well so first of all, there's a there's a term in law, justiciable. This is not justiciable. In other words, this is not the president is exercising his article two powers to defend the country against an invasion or to repel a foreign terrorist that is unlawfully in the country, he's exercising his court article two powers as commander in chief. Speaker 0: Is Venezuela invading The US? Speaker 1: This is this is a very important point. This is a title 50 authority. It's a commander in chief authority. So just to ask you a simple question. You you talk about how the system works. Does a district court judge have the right to direct or enjoin troop movements overseas? Yes or no? Speaker 0: Well, Steven, my question I Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. Speaker 0: It's If you could answer my question Speaker 1: first. In other words, Speaker 0: the Is Venezuela is Venezuela invading our country in a way that would T t t t a. Speaker 1: So under the so I'll answer yours, and you'll answer mine. Under the terms of the statute, Trane de Aragua is an alien enemy force that has come here as detailed at length in the proclamation at the direction of the Venezuelan government. The statute says that a president has the ability to repel an invasion or predatory incursion that is directed by Speaker 0: a foreign government. Right? Are they a state or Speaker 1: a government? This would be yes. It is it is documented. The the TDA was sent by the Venezuelan government in the proclamation. And here's an even more important point. Under the constitution, who makes that determination? A district court judge elected by no one or the commander in chief of the army and navy? The president and the president's alone makes a decision of what triggers that Speaker 0: determination statute. Actually at war with Venezuela, the nation state of Venezuela? Speaker 1: You're not hearing understanding me. Read the statute. Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight. It says if a predatory incursion is perpetrated by a foreign government so it lists a three three qualifying actions. It could be an act of war. In the Speaker 0: very beginning, there has to be declared war against a nation or Speaker 1: a state. That's what it says. Wrong. Look up the statute. It's on my account on social media. You can see it? The yes. It says or a predatory incursion or an invasion. The statute delineates three criteria for triggering the Alley Enemies Act. One is a act of war, which, by way, an invasion is an act of war, but put that aside. One is an invasion, which this is. One is a predatory incursion, which this is. So it actually meets all three statutory criteria. But with respect to this particular statute, it's the proclamation is utilizing the incursion and invasion language in the statute. So but no. But this is a very important question because no. No. No. Hold on. It's a very important question. You said the way our system works is the president of The United States commands the armed forces of the country, commands the foreign policy of the country, and that's subject to district court review. That is Speaker 0: fundamentally not true. I never said that, Steven. I did not say Speaker 1: never been true. Speaker 0: This was not a military upper I mean, the Speaker 1: A district court judge can no more enjoin the expulsion of foreign terrorists to foreign soil, that he can direct the movement of air force one, that he can direct the movement of an aircraft carrier, that he can direct Marco Rubio to engage the diplomacy in a Speaker 0: country. Or not? Like, does the Supreme Court of the United States have any say over the things that you were just outlining right here? Speaker 1: I believe what the Supreme Court will say is what I just said, which is that the president's conduct here is not subject to Speaker 0: judicial review. You are acknowledging that they do in fact have a say here. Well Even though you think they may agree with you. Speaker 1: What we are expecting is the Supreme Court to say what has always been the case, which is when the president is using his powers as commander in chief, those determinations are not subject to judicial review. In other words, the president's designation of as a foreign terrorist organization and as an alien enemy are part of his inherent plenary authority. There is no Speaker 0: way what point in Speaker 1: this system, how how are you going to expel illegal illegal alien invaders from our country who are raping little girls, who are murdering little girls if each and every deportation has to be adjudicated in a district court judge? And that means you have no country. Sovereignty. It means you have no future. It is fundamentally incompatible to have a country and have individual expulsions adjudicated by a single district court judge. Speaker 0: I'm just trying to figure out at what point Speaker 1: in the Speaker 0: system do you because what does the Trump administration believe? Because we do have separation of powers in this country. I hear what you're saying. Speaker 1: Yes. Of powers. Speaker 0: This is Speaker 1: the judiciary interfering Steven. Let me finish. Executive function. Speaker 0: Let me That Speaker 1: is the separation of powers. That is Speaker 0: order here because you thought you could? Speaker 1: So the judge's order and the actions taken by the departments of defense, justice, and homeland security are not in conflict. And the department just has been clear that they are not in conflict. But I So you think that Speaker 0: you did go along with the order that the judge put out? You do not think that the Trump administration I agree. This order? Speaker 1: As the justice department said, there is no conflict between the judge's order, and the action is taken by the departments I just listed. But I'm making a deeper and more fundamental point. Yeah. The district Speaker 0: court has to, Speaker 1: in any way, restrain the president's authorities under the Alien Enemies Act or his ability to conduct the foreign affairs of United States. Let me paint a picture for you. President Trump and secretary of state Marco Rubio had engaged in intensive intensive diplomacy to obtain a bilateral security agreement with the nation of El Salvador. If a district court judge So can join that bilateral security agreement Again. Then we do not have a democracy. Major argument. Got it. Policy. Speaker 0: Heard you say this. I've Did did you ignore did the ignore the order from the district judge? Speaker 1: I've It's Speaker 0: a simple question. Speaker 1: I've and I've answered it. I've I've answered it because this the department has made a filing in the court. But let me make another point. The judge in this case put the lives of every single person on those aircraft at risk. Did he know how much fuel was in those planes? Did he know the flight conditions? Did he know the weather conditions? Did he know how many crew hours? Did he know the need for crew rest? Did he know any of that? No. This judge violated the law. He violated the constitution. He defied the system of government that we have in this country. Speaker 0: Courts because that does to Speaker 1: be what you're arguing. The same the same district court judges didn't do a damn thing to stop Joe Biden from flooding this nation with millions of illegal aliens. Do these district court judges didn't issue any injunctions to save the lives of Jocelyn Mungry, Blake, anyone Speaker 0: courts. Is that what you're saying? Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that what you said, there's a separation of powers. The the the judiciary exercises Speaker 0: judgment and relief. I don't speak for the White House. You you are here to speak Speaker 1: for the White House. Speaker 0: Will I just want you to answer that one simple question. I am. Speaker 1: Ready? Here we go. Under a proper reading of the constitution, district court judges provide relief to individual plaintiffs seeking relief. District court judges do not have the authority as a general matter to enjoin the functioning of the executive branch, but their authority is at its lowest point when the president is exercising his powers as commander in chief. And I asked you a question. You never answered it. Can a judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Can a district court judge enjoin troop movements overseas? Stephen? Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I I am not gonna get into the the Speaker 1: the This And then you'll know that I'm right. Speaker 0: Is a separate question. Speaker 1: You'll know that I'm right. Speaker 0: Okay. We're not talking about other other truths of me. I need to ask you about something else. The president Speaker 1: issued a proclamation d delineating delineating in detail how the Venezuelan regime sent this gang, this terrorist organization to our shores. And by the way and I and I love being here, but all the outrage that we are seeing from the Democrat party and from the corporate Speaker 0: media
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 2:59 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

While Democrats bawl like angry toddlers and key Teslas in acts of terrorism, Republicans like @elonmusk take private enterprise to the heavens. Here are SpaceX astronauts rescuing fellow Americans abandoned by Joe Biden. This is America at its finest. https://t.co/CtZOpG7cQW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The station hatch is open. Dragon, SpaceX is communicating with ground control regarding crew status. Vapor on Dragon is speaking with Mike at ground control. Ground control is checking in on the progress of Butch and Nick as they move through vestibule pressurization. They are also inquiring about the status of the crew's inventory reports and note about twenty minutes remaining on soot drying. Vapor confirms about twenty minutes on soot drying, that 1.5 crew members have changed, and the other two are doing inventory and packing. They will also provide water and feed inventory. SpaceX acknowledges. The crew inside Dragon is speaking with SpaceX's Mission Control in Hawthorne, California.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Houston on two. Seals look good. No condensation. Houston copies. Speaker 1: Station hatch is now open. Speaker 2: And Dragon, SpaceX on Dragon to ground for crew status. Speaker 0: Hey, Mike. It's Vapor on Dragon to Ground. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Hey, Vapor. Just wanted to, check-in since I see Butch and Nick are moving pretty close through the vestibule pressurization and, those tasks there. So just wanted to get a status on your guys' inventory reports. And I see about twenty minutes on soot drying and just wanted to to check-in. Speaker 0: Yep. We're checking about twenty minutes on soot drying as well. You've got 1.5 of us changed, and then the other two are doing the inventory and packing right now. And we'll get you the water and feed inventory too. Speaker 2: Okay. SpaceX copies all. Speaker 1: So as a read back, you can hear the crew inside Dragon speaking with the core that's over at SpaceX's Mission Control in Hawthorne, California.
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 12:33 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

It is now clear that voter fraud existed extensively in the 2020 election. If you are in illegally in possession of a social security card, you can usually get a driver’s license, and then it’s just an easy step to voter registration. Each is a crime if you’re an illegal alien.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The truth keeps coming out. Illegals in Arizona have been receiving US social security cards Immigration attorney in Florence, Arizona says “One our clients got detained by ICE this morning — HE HAD HIS SOCIAL SECURITY CARD” Just imagine how many illegals voted in Arizona https://t.co/RUppXk5eoT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wanted to give everyone an important immigration update. This morning, my staff told me that one of our clients was detained by ICE on his way to check in with them. He was under ICE supervision and had both his social security card and EAD. He was doing everything right, but ICE still detained him, and he is now at the Florence Immigration Processing Center. This is unusual because he has a social security card and an EAD under Temporary Protected Status. I want to warn everyone who feels safe checking in with ICE to be very careful because this could happen to you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So just an update in terms of immigration, and I think that this is important for everyone to consider. So this morning, I came into the office and my staff, they were just kind of like, Sheree. Guess what happened? One of our clients got detained by ICE this morning, on his way to check-in with ICE, meaning that he was under, supervision of ICE and he has his social security card and his EAD. And so he went in, did doing the right thing and ICE detains him. Now he's detained in Florence Immigration Processing Center. And, this is so uncommon because it's not like he was out there without any social or an EAD. He's definitely under Temporal Protected Status. So this message is basically for anyone who even feels like they're safe with that and they're checking in. Be very, very careful because it might happen.
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 12:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion highlights the suspension of electric-only rebuilding mandates in California, with a focus on the end of certain social policies and the shift in priorities for young Americans away from foreign conflicts. A question arises about Elon Musk's stance on property taxes.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

They are now suspending mandated electric-only rebuilding in California. Pronoun nonsense is history. DEI scams, globalist economics, a porous border - all history. Young Americans are no longer dying in endless wars. This was the most important election in a century.

@josettecaruso - josette caruso

@RealJamesWoods Is Elon Musk eluding that he’s in favor of abolishing property taxes? https://t.co/TMrWWwh9t1

Saved - January 9, 2025 at 4:28 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Our deck three minutes ago. https://t.co/KpZDELpN8L

Video Transcript AI Summary
You're looking good! Your house is safe, but I'm here just in case. Hopefully, your windows are closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're looking good. Your house is not on fire, but it's I'm here in case some embers land on it. Hopefully, your windows are closed.
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 10:09 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. - Winston Churchill https://t.co/i4iGEpuTxZ

Saved - December 5, 2024 at 8:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Big Guy made a significant strategic mistake with this broad pardon. If he had allowed the conviction to stand and then pardoned the kid for specific charges, it would have deflected attention from the larger Ukraine issues and made Republicans look petty. Now, this pardon raises questions about the extent of the Biden crime spree, prompting a desire for deeper investigation. With Hunter losing Fifth Amendment protection, it feels like the time for hearings has arrived. I'm ready for what comes next.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

The Big Guy may have made a catastrophic strategic error with this pardon. Had he let the conviction and sentence stand, and then pardoned the kid for the specific tax and gun transgressions, he would have checked any further actions delving into the Ukraine grift, which is enormous. Republicans would have appeared petty going after “old news” crimes, and the Biden Crime Cartel would have gotten away with the biggest money laundering scheme in American history. Now, however, by issuing this absurdly broad pardon, one can easily infer the monumental magnitude of the Biden crime spree. NOW any decent American will want to know how deep the Biden rot goes. NOW let’s have the hearings wherein Hunter no longer enjoys Fifth Amendment protection by virtue of this pardon that reeks of guilt and moral decay to its very core. Bring on the popcorn, and lots of it.

Saved - December 2, 2024 at 11:15 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Watching these chirping dingleberries slavishly spewing the mantra when it was Trump who “wasn’t above the law,” is now fingers on the chalkboard. What hypocrites these fetid pustules of servitude have become. 🤮 https://t.co/lUxyNQSr01

Video Transcript AI Summary
No person is above the law, regardless of their position or title. This principle is fundamental to American justice. Everyone, including former presidents, must be held accountable under the same laws. There cannot be two justice systems; we must ensure that the law applies equally to all. The rule of law means that no one is exempt, and it is essential for maintaining a fair society. The idea that anyone could be above the law undermines the very foundation of our legal system. We must uphold this principle to ensure justice for everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The idea that no person is above the law is a bedrock principle of American justice. No man is above the law no matter what the crime. And I agree with you. No no man is above the law, and no person is above the law. No one is above the law. No one is above the law. No one's above the law. No one is above the law. No man is above the law. Nobody is above the law. No one is above the law. He No man is above the law. Speaker 1: He has to be held accountable. He's not above the law. Speaker 0: No one's above the law. Either that nor any other title puts you above the rule of law. And no one is truly above the law. That is what it means to have a rule of law. That is what it means to not have a king. They're not above the law. Nobody is above the law. Everyone will be treated as Merrick Garland has said as, you know, equally. Told that no one is above the law, which is foundational. No one is above the law, even a former president. We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone. No one is above the law. The law is the law, and no one should be above it. Yes. Nobody is above the law. No one is above the law. No one else is above the law, including a president. Speaker 1: Is above the law. I have 2 justice systems in America. It has to be one justice system, and anybody who breaks the law should be held accountable. Speaker 0: And that no one is above the law. No one is above the law, and, our president is not above the law. I always thought that this country that no one was above the law, especially the president.
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 7:13 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

I’m voting for this police officer on my Oscar ballot this year. Epic!!! https://t.co/56NY4jVSQP

Video Transcript AI Summary
You have a California driver's license but no physical copy? That's noted. You identify as a cat? The information on the tag seems to belong to your boyfriend. I didn't mean to offend, but I assumed you two were together based on your attire. However, I'm not mad about the assumption; I'm just his owner, not his boyfriend. We can handle this differently. I could tow the car since a cat can't drive in California. Animal control could take you to a shelter, and your owner would need to pay $70 for retrieval and immunizations. What do you want to do? I can also call a mental health professional if you're considering a rabies shot instead of just showing me your ID.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you do currently have a California driver's license. You just don't have a physical copy on you at the moment? That's my preferred method of identification. Speaker 1: And this is? It's a Speaker 0: cat caller. I'm currently identifying as a cat. Fair enough. The information here on the tag, I'm assuming, belongs to you, the boyfriend. Yeah. Speaker 1: That's so rude. I hope you know I'm recording. Speaker 0: Well, it wasn't my intention to offend you, but he just identified as a cat, and you're wearing a Harris Walsh T shirt. So forgive me if I came to a conclusion that you guys are involved in some sort of a homosexual arrangement. Speaker 1: I'm not mad that you think we're together, but you're using gender language. Besides, I'm not his boyfriend. I'm his owner. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, look. We can do this the hard way if you'd like. I can have this car towed because last I checked, a cat is not licensed to operate a motor vehicle in the state of California. We can have animal control come get you, take you to a shelter where your owner can retrieve you for a fee of $70 after you're given the necessary immunizations, which do include a rabies shot, possibly even spayed or neuter, whichever you prefer or identify with. Is that what you guys wanna do here? What should Speaker 1: we do? I don't know. I don't have $70. Speaker 0: Sir, I can also, request that a mental health care professional come down here on scene and do an evaluation of you because you're considering letting him take a rabies shot rather than just give me an ID, use some manner so I can give you your ticket and move along.
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 6:15 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

What you did to Justice Kavanaugh will be served back to you 7 times 70, one delicious bite at a time. Oh, it’s going to be Biblical. #BuckleUpChuck https://t.co/p5xA7hlnyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
To my Republican colleagues, I urge caution in interpreting the election results. Avoid the temptation to move to extremes, as history shows this often backfires. Our effectiveness relies on bipartisanship. If we want the Senate to be as productive in the next four years as it has been, cooperation is essential. Democrats are committed to working across the aisle when opportunities arise, without compromising our values. The question now is whether Republicans will embrace the same spirit of collaboration. Remember, bipartisanship is the most effective way to achieve our goals, just as it has been in the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now let me turn to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. Another closely contested election now comes to an end. To my Republican colleagues, I offer a word of caution in good faith. Take care not to misread the will of the people, and do not abandon the need for bipartisanship. After winning an election, the temptation may be to go to the extreme. We've seen that happen over the decades, and it's consistently backfired on the party in power. So instead of going to the extremes, I remind my colleagues that this body is most effective when it's bipartisan. If we want in the next 4 years the senate to be product as productive as the last 4, the only way that will happen is through bipartisan cooperation. Democrats will be ready to do what we have consistently done, work with both sides when the opportunity arises. Democrats will never abandon our values, but neither will we reject an opportunity to move the ball forward to make people's lives better when we can. The question is now whether or not Republicans are willing to do the same. To my colleagues on the other side, once again, do not abandon bipartisanship. It's the best and most effective way to get things done. It was true in the last 4 years and will be true in the years to come.
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 9:14 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Funny how they can tabulate votes to influence an election before Election Day, but can’t get a total for WEEKS in states they are losing after Election Day.

@MAGAShaggy1 - Shaggy

Are they planning on stealing Texas and it’s 40 electoral votes ? https://t.co/Y6zTw2bLKz

Saved - November 1, 2024 at 9:36 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Kamala Harris said this on camera: “Just because you are in the sanctity of your home, doesn’t mean we’re not going to walk into your home and check to see if you’re being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs.” https://t.co/27wwpOUmum

Video Transcript AI Summary
I own a Glock, which I've had for quite some time, and my background is in law enforcement. Yes, I've fired it at a shooting range. Regarding assault weapons, I support a mandatory buyback program and a ban on their importation. We need to address the over 2 million assault weapons already in circulation. If Congress doesn’t act within 100 days, I will implement comprehensive background checks and an assault weapons ban through executive action. We will also work to pass universal background checks and red flag laws. It's important to ensure responsible gun ownership in the community, and we will check for safety in homes where guns are legally possessed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. It's not the first time I've I've talked Speaker 1: about it. That's not the first time I've talked about it. Speaker 2: So what kind of gun do you own, and when and why did you get it? Speaker 0: I have a Glock. Speaker 3: Recently surprised people when you said that you are a gun owner, Speaker 2: and then if someone came into your house Speaker 0: That's not the first time I've I've talked Speaker 1: about it. That's not the first time I've talked about it. Speaker 2: So what kind of gun do you own, and when and why did you get it? Speaker 0: I have a Glock, and, I've had it for quite some time. And, I mean, look, Bill, my background is in law enforcement. And so there you go. Speaker 3: Have you ever fired it? Speaker 0: Yes. Of course I have. At a shooting range? Yes. Of course, I have. Speaker 3: When we come back, vice presidential candidate Tim Walz gets the 60 minutes treatment, and Kamala Harris talks about why Donald Trump decided not to. Assault weapons that are already in circulation. What do you do about those? Speaker 4: If we have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory buyback program Speaker 0: So what kind of gun executive action and put in place a ban on the importation of assault weapons into our country. But we still have to deal with the over 2,000,000 assault weapons that are currently in the streets of America. And so a buyback program, I is a good idea. But if Congress fails to act, I'll give them 100 days to put a pill bill on my desk for signature. And if they do not do it, I will put in place by executive action a comprehensive background check requirement and a ban on the assault weapons and importation of assault weapons into our country. I'm done. And that's why we will work to pass universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban. Speaker 4: In the community and just responsible behaviors, among everybody in the community. And just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home, doesn't mean that we're not gonna walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affair. Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 4: Thankfully, if you're locked home, doesn't mean that we're not gonna walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in a way to that your affair.
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 9:03 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

This has to be fake. Even Kamala Harris, the gold standard of stupid, isn’t stupid enough to post this. Certainly not while North Carolinians are pulling the bodies of their neighbors from the wreckage. It’s simply inconceivable.

@VP - Vice President Kamala Harris

The people of Lebanon are facing an increasingly dire humanitarian situation. I am concerned about the security and well-being of civilians suffering in Lebanon and will continue working to help meet the needs of all civilians there. To that end, the United States will provide nearly $157 million in additional assistance to the people of Lebanon for essential needs such as food, shelter, water, protection, and sanitation to help those who have been displaced by the recent conflict. This additional support brings total U.S. assistance to Lebanon over the last year to over $385 million.

Saved - October 4, 2024 at 6:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received a powerful DM from a follower about the tragedy in western NC, particularly in Clyde, her hometown. She expressed deep sorrow over the devastation, with many dead and missing, and homes destroyed. The imagery of picking bodies from trees and children searching for parents is haunting. She mourns the loss of her father and questions when humanity will take precedence over politics. Her message calls for a return to compassion and highlights the heartlessness she perceives on social media, urging for more focus on simple humanity and kindness.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

A person who follows me sent this DM, regarding the horrific tragedy befalling western NC. I don’t know her name, but her missive is so powerful, so moving, that I must share it. Warning: it is not easy reading. “When do people matter more than politics? My little hometown is decimated. Clyde, NC. Western NC is gone. So many people dead and still missing. So many without homes now. I can't breathe. That will always be my home and it's destroyed. Picking bodies out of trees and mud. Children naked, searching for their parents. My heart can't take much more. 💔 And I lost my daddy up there 6 days ago. When does the pain stop? WHAT do we have to do to get back to the basics of humanity? Because that seems to be missing on social media these days. People are so heartless. Maybe that needs to be a conversation. Simple, humanity. The ugly things I see on here are beyond my comprehension. When did picking a side become more important than someone's wellbeing? We really need more God. Thanks for reading.”

Saved - October 3, 2024 at 9:36 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Biden/Harris plan for Americans in need, and for invaders who will vote illegally… https://t.co/u6rYyw2xXN

Saved - September 26, 2024 at 3:21 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Another lunatic Democrat calling on their paramilitary wing to “extinguish” a political opponent “for good.” Imagine if we had a Secret Service that would investigate threats calling for the eradication of a presidential candidate. Oh, wait… https://www.dailywire.com/news/commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-calls-to-extinguish-trump-for-good-after-assassination-attempts

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo Calls To ‘Extinguish’ Trump ‘For Good’ After Assassination Attempts Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo ignited social media on Wednesday after she called to “extinguish” former President Donald Trump “for good” which comes after Trump has survived multiple assassination attempts. Raimondo made the remarks during an MSNBC interview on “Morning Joe,” where she was attacking claims made by the former president, saying that whatever he says ... dailywire.com
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 9:06 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Then they’ll whine discrimination when the store closes, never to return. Vote Democrat for more of this!

@LibertyPillMeme - Liberty Pill Memes

@amuse Mass looting of Apple store in Philadelphia https://t.co/9RQ4GYvpEy

Saved - September 7, 2024 at 2:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on a statement from former Vice President Dick Cheney, who criticized Donald Trump as a significant threat to our republic. Cheney emphasized that Trump attempted to undermine the last election through lies and violence, making him untrustworthy for future power. He urged citizens to prioritize the country over party loyalty to protect the Constitution and announced his intention to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris.

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

And now, here’s the guy who waged an entire war based on utterly false information, a war that cost precious American lives and the lives of many innocent civilians: Statement from Former Vice President Dick Cheney: "In our nation's 248-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again. As citizens, we each have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution. That is why I will be casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris."

Saved - June 26, 2024 at 5:17 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

https://t.co/kU137ftmot

Saved - May 9, 2024 at 5:43 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

This video shows American journalists (back when there was such a thing as real journalism) discussing hypothetical culpability of being embedded in a North Vietnamese army unit ambushing fellow American citizens. https://t.co/DW898roNLt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the ethical dilemma of journalists witnessing an ambush on American soldiers. Some believe journalists should prioritize saving lives over reporting, while others argue for journalistic duty. General Scobor emphasizes being American first, journalist second. Westmoreland finds it repugnant to film such events, fearing public perception. The debate highlights the complex moral decisions faced in wartime reporting. Colonel expresses contempt for journalists expecting rescue, questioning their loyalty. Ultimately, the discussion revolves around the conflicting responsibilities of journalists in combat situations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that if you and that if you're in, you're in. I mean, I live in fear, of course, of coming upon an American unit as well as the South Kossanese one. But Speaker 1: If you made shooting the American soldiers. Speaker 0: Well, I guess I I guess I would I guess I no. I guess I wouldn't. I mean, I'm I'm gonna tell you now what I'm feeling rather than than the hypothesis I drew for myself. If I was with a North Khozanese unit that came upon Americans, I think I personally would do what I could to warn the Americans, Speaker 1: Even if it means not getting the live coverage? Speaker 0: Well, it would mean my life, and I don't have much doubt about that, I think. And I'm very glad this is a hypothetical. But I do not think I could bring myself to participate in that fashion. That's purely personal. Other reporters might have a different reaction. Speaker 2: Mister Wallace? I think so. Other reporters would have a different reaction. Speaker 1: Such as? Speaker 2: They would they would regard it simply as another story that they are there to cover. Speaker 1: They're gonna cover enemy soldiers shooting and killing American soldiers. Mhmm. Yes. Could you imagine how they would report that to the American people? Speaker 2: Surely, I can. Could you do it? Would I do it? I'm an old man. I don't know that I would, I find it very difficult to believe, and I'm I'm I'm I'm astonished really to hear Peter say that. You're a reporter. Granted you're an American, but you're a reporter covering combat between North Kosan, South Kosan, and the ally. And I'm a little bit at a loss to understand why because you are an American, you would not have covered that story. I mean, when we go back to Vietnam, there were all kinds of reporters who did indeed go in to Hanoi, wanted to go to Hai Phong. Everybody wanted to go there. Why would a reporter say, I'm not going to cover that because I am unhappy about what's happening there? It's not unhappiness, mister Wallace. It's Speaker 1: that you have a higher duty as an American citizen to do all that you can to save the lives of soldiers rather than this journalistic ethic of reporting Speaker 0: the fact. Speaker 2: No. You don't have the higher duty to no. No. You're a reporter. Your job is to cover what is going on in that war. People know that Americans are getting killed in that war. Lord knows it's a hypothetical. I would probably I'd get on I'd get on the horn with Peter and say, what the dickens do you mean? Speaker 0: I think he's right too. I check a note. I mean, I played the hypothetical very hard, but I think he's right. Speaker 3: I think they've got the same problems that Downs has. Speaker 1: What's the problem, General Scobor? Speaker 3: I think the problem is the situation, the job as opposed to a higher to a higher cause. First of all, I think you're Americans first and you're journalists second. Just as I think the downs is sure, he's a unit commander, and he's got these terrible ethical problems, but we do live by rules in this society, rules of right and wrong, even situationally in the up in the broad sense. General Stoltz, what Speaker 2: is wrong with photographing this attack by North Coast on Speaker 3: American soldiers? Simply because what's it worth? It's worth 30 seconds on the evening news as opposed to saving a platoon, what have you. I mean, what difference does Speaker 2: it make on Speaker 3: the evening news? You see some you see some Americans get killed. Speaker 2: In other words, what you're saying is that the reporter should say, hey. Hold it, fellas. Americans, these guys are about to go after you and and you die. That's really what what what the question is here. Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 1: And your answer is? Speaker 2: I don't know. Speaker 3: You see, Speaker 0: and I agree with Mike intellectually. And, I really do. I I and and and I wish at the time I'd make it I'd made another decision, but, but it wasn't the one I made at the moment. I would like to have made his decision. Speaker 1: Joe Westmoreland? Speaker 4: Well, it's rather repugnant to me, and I think it would be repugnant to the, American listening public to see on film in the United States an ambush of an American platoon by our national enemy. The conclusion that would be drawn is that, the network is, in cahoots with the enemy. Speaker 1: General, the the the same the question is Speaker 2: raised, actually, in the cities of New York in the cities of of this country in which you say, if you knew that a murder was gonna take place at a time, would you cover that story, or would you let the object of that murder know? Or would you let the the police know? I think and I've answered this question before. I think that I would surely not let the man or the woman be murdered. I would I would let the authorities know. And then you say, alright. Under those circumstances, now move it over into war. And it's like, I'm going back and forth as I sit here. I understand all of the stresses and strains that are going that are going on. It's a hell of a dilemma to be in. I think Speaker 0: You know, they're calling me back. My I hope to tell me it wasn't such a stupid Speaker 1: Colonel, I Speaker 5: feel utter contempt. 2 days later, they're both walking off my hilltop. They're 200 yards away, and they get ambushed. And they're lying there wounded. And they're gonna expect I'm gonna send marines out there to Speaker 2: get them. Speaker 5: They're just journalists. They're not Americans. Is that a fair reaction? Yeah. Can't have it both ways. Speaker 0: It's fair. Speaker 2: It's a fair reaction. It's a fair reaction. Speaker 5: But I'll do it. And that's what makes me so contemptuous of them. And Marines will die going to get a couple of journals.
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 4:08 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

These are the numbskulls the "Ivy League" schools are knuckling under to. https://t.co/L4BehdAoYW

Saved - March 29, 2024 at 2:20 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

This is such astonishing bullshit, it's impossible to imagine how this charlatan does it with a straight face. https://t.co/OLX4oavWzq

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need more workers due to a declining population. To ensure a prosperous future, we must welcome and support immigrants, including dreamers. Our goal is to provide a path to citizenship for all undocumented individuals in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now more than ever, we're short of workers. We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we're gonna have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers but get a path to citizenship for all 11,000,000 or however many undocumented there are here.
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 12:59 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Watch this video in its entirety. Clinton and Soros have worked tirelessly to turn America into "an open society." If you like what you're seeing in our society today, then by all means continue to vote Democrat. https://t.co/dhDp9zaoRW

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have been given a blessing and our country needs us. George Soros is fearless and willing to step up when it counts. He is introduced by Hillary, who he admires greatly. Soros has seen her deliver a speech about open society and visit central Asia where he has foundations. He feels the need to become engaged in the electoral process in this country for the first time. In his foundations, he has provided financial support for people who believe in the idea of an open society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have been given an extraordinary blessing. And at this moment in time, our country needs us and we need people like George Soros who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts. So please join me in welcoming George Soros. Speaker 1: I'm very, very proud to be introduced by Hillary. I've seen her in operation. I have great, great admiration for her. I see her deliver a speech at in Davos about open society, that explained the ideas better than Anybody else that I've heard, I've seen her, visit central Asia where I have foundations, And she was really very effective, more effective than most of our statesmen. And I think she hit the nail on the head, when she said that there are people who have never been involved In a very active way, in electoral, politics, who now feel, the need to do so, and I stand here before you as such a person. It is the first time that I feel that I need to stand up And do something really, and become really engaged, in the electoral process in in this country, in in my foundations, basically, I have provided financial support for people In those countries who believed in the idea of an open society
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 4:06 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

This is just perfection. Watch the video.

@ULTRA_MAJESTY - Suhr Majesty ™

@RealJamesWoods Bonhoeffer's Theory of Stupidity explains how this can happen. Dietrich Bonhoeffer argued that stupid people are more dangerous than evil ones. Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German Lutheran pastor, theologian. https://t.co/bCmaBRvXKW

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the darkest chapter of German history, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a young pastor, spoke out against the atrocities committed by the regime. He believed that stupidity, not malice, was the root of the problem. Stupidity, he argued, is a moral defect rather than an intellectual one. Stupid people are self-satisfied, resistant to reason, and easily irritated. Bonhoeffer believed that stupidity is more dangerous than malice because it cannot be exposed or prevented by force. He also noted that power often infects people with stupidity, depriving them of their inner independence. To overcome stupidity, liberation is necessary. Bonhoeffer died in a concentration camp, but his message remains relevant: actions must come from a readiness for responsibility, and the ultimate test of a moral society is the world it leaves for its children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the darkest chapter of German history, during a time when incited mobs threw stones into the windows of innocent shop owners, and women and children were cruelly humiliated in the open, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a young pastor, began to speak publicly against the atrocities that the regime had produced. After years of trying to change people's minds, Dietrich Bonhoeffer came home 1 evening, and his own father had to tell him that 2 men were waiting in his room to take him away. In prison, Bonhoeffer began to reflect on how his country of poets and thinkers had turned into a collective of cowards, crooks, and criminals. Eventually, he concluded that the root of the problem was not malice, but stupidity. In his famous letters from prison, Bonhoeffer argued that stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice, because while one may protest against evil, It can be exposed and prevented by the use of force. Against stupidity, we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here, reasons fall on deaf ears. Facts that contradict a stupid person's prejudgment simply need not be believed, and when they are irrefutable, they are just pushed aside as inconsequential as incidental. In all this, the stupid person is self satisfied and being easily irritated becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, Greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with a malicious one. If we want to know how to get the better of stupidity, we must seek to understand its nature. This much is certain. Stupidity is, in essence, not an intellectual defect, but a moral one. There are human beings who are remarkably agile intellectually, yet stupid, and others who are intellectually dull, yet anything but stupid. The impression one gains is not so much that stupidity is a congenital defect, but that, under certain circumstances, people are made stupid, or rather, they allow this to happen to them. People who live in solitude manifest this defect less frequently than individuals in groups. And so it would seem that stupidity is perhaps less a psychological than a sociological problem. It becomes apparent that every Strong upsurge of power, be it of a political or religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity, almost as if this is a sociological, psychological law, where the power of the one needs the stupidity of the other. The process at work here is not that particular human capacities, such as intellect, suddenly fail. Instead, it seems that under the Overwhelming impact of rising power, humans are deprived of their inner independence and, more or less consciously, give up an autonomous position. The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us from the fact that he is not independent. In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with him as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, and the like that have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and is abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the stupid person will also be capable of any evil, incapable of seeing that it is evil. Only an act of liberation, not instruction, can overcome stupidity. Here, we must come to terms with the fact that in most cases, a genuine internal liberation becomes possible only when external liberation has preceded it. Until then, we must abandon all attempts to convince the stupid person. Bonhoeffer died due to his involvement in a plot against Adolf Hitler at dawn on the 9th April, 1945 at Flossenburg concentration camp, just 2 weeks before soldiers from the United States liberated the camp. Actions brings not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility. The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children, Bonhoeffer once said. Check the description below to read Bonhoeffer's original text after 10 years. For more information about Bonhoeffer or to download this video without background music, go to sproutschools.com. Speaker 1: Sprout's videos are published under the Creative Commons license. That means our videos are free, and anyone can download, edit, and play them for personal use. And public schools, Governments and nonprofit organizations can also use them for training, online courses, or designing new curriculums. To help us stay independent and support our work, you can join our patrons and contribute. Just visit patreon.com/sprouts. Even $1 can make a difference.
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 3:35 AM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Remember when the liberals mocked President Trump for saying they were sending their worst across the border?

@JoeyMannarinoUS - Joey Mannarino

This is Saulo Cardoso Ferreira. He's a Brazillian illegal alien who was living in Martha's Vineyard. Yes, that Martha's Vinyeard. He sexually assaulted a five-year-old child in his homeland and then ran from authorities to America to try and hide out. Brazil sentenced him to 14 years in prison and rather than serve his sentence, he bailed and came across our porous Southern Border. Luckily, he was deported and sent back to Brazil, where he came from. These are the people coming across our Southern Border. Unvetted. Unchecked. Predators. How long until he raped a kid in America? #MigrantRapists

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 2:18 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

Garland’s mob never charged Trump with insurrection, because they knew they couldn’t win. So Democrats did the next best thing. Kept repeating a mantra that wasn’t true. Over and over and over again. It’s a trick called the Big Lie, created and perfected by Joseph Goebbels.

View Full Interactive Feed