reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @RealKahall

RealKahall
Posted - May 24, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 2:19 PM

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT for those who signed up for TSA PreCheck and Global PreCheck. https://t.co/PDoWjO9K9a

Video Transcript AI Summary
Individuals enrolling in TSA PreCheck or Global Entry sign a release granting the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI unrestricted, warrantless access to all their personal data. This includes health records, physical and mental information, social media, communications, and court history. This access is indefinite. People are giving up their rights permanently for the convenience of faster passage through security. This sweeping surrender of privacy is in the fine print that few people read.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Now, you posted on RealKA Hall that people who've signed up for the speedier passage through TSA have also raved waved a very important right. What have they signed away? Speaker 1: So when individuals enroll in TSA PreCheck or Global Entry, they actually sign a release granting the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI unrestricted, warrantless access to all their personal data. Health records, physical, mental, social media, communications, court history, anything they want, they have access indefinitely. And this sweeping surrender of privacy is in the fine print few people ever really read. So the people end up giving up their permanent rights or their rights permanently for the convenience of maybe a little bit faster time in line.
RealKahall
Posted - May 26, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 2:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
When I sign up for TSA Precheck, Global Precheck, CLEAR, or TWIC, I agree to a Privacy Act Notice that allows the Department of Homeland Security, especially TSA, to access various sensitive information. This includes criminal, immigration, and terrorism-related databases, as well as unrestricted access to my mental and physical health records, banking, and digital records. They can review any information they consider necessary to assess my security risk and share it with other government agencies if needed.

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

When you sign up for TSA Precheck, Global Precheck, CLEAR, or TWIC you voluntarily sign a Privacy Act Notice and Authorization, which gives the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — particularly TSA — permission to: •Access criminal, immigration, and terrorism-related databases •unfettered access to mental health and physical health records •unfettered access to banking and digital records •Review any information “deemed necessary” to determine whether the applicant poses a security threat •and share with other government agencies as “deemed necessary.”

RealKahall
Posted - April 27, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Saved - April 27, 2025 at 12:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that Klaus Schwab stepping down from the World Economic Forum is not a victory; he simply retired. We should prepare for a new leader who may be even worse. Globalists are not our friends; they aim to control us and future generations. True liberty comes from a collective awakening, recognizing that it is a gift from God, not a favor from tyrants. To ensure freedom for our children, we must remain vigilant and resist the globalists, understanding that liberty must be fought for and protected by the courageous and aware.

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

If you believe Klaus Schwab stepping down from the World Economic Forum is some kind of victory, you don’t understand how the system operates. Schwab didn’t fall — he retired. Full stop. And what’s coming next? Brace yourself. Meet your new boss — worse than the old boss. Liberty has never been — and will never be — a gift from the globalists. They are not your friends. They are your would-be masters. Their only goal is to dominate you, your children, and every generation that follows. The liberty of the people has always come through a great awakening — when ordinary men and women realize that Liberty is a gift from God, not a favor from tyrants. If we want our children to live free, we must be vigilant today. We must stand against the globalists — not cozy up to them. Liberty is not handed down. Liberty is fought for, protected, and preserved — by the courageous, the awake, and the unbreakable.

RealKahall
Posted - April 11, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 7:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I address a misconception from a Texas Representative about the role of government. Many fail to understand that political power originates with the people, as stated in Article 1, Section 2 of the Texas Constitution. This principle is echoed in every State Constitution: the people are the power, not the State. Local government should be controlled by the citizens, and issues arise when they become complacent. Handing power to a larger authority doesn't solve problems; it merely replaces one form of tyranny with another. The solution lies in the people themselves.

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

This widespread misconception spoken by this TX Rep stems from a complete failure to educate Americans on the origin, purpose, and proper role of government. People believe the lie because they haven’t even bothered to read their own Constitutions. 1. Article 1, Section 2 of the Texas Constitution says it plainly: “INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit.” Let that sink in: Power does not flow from the State down to the people. Power begins with the people—and is delegated upward, not downward. 2. Every single State Constitution affirms this same principle. Political power originates in the people. Which means the people don’t ask for power—they are the power. 3. And that’s why government power is most effective—and most controllable—at its source: LOCALLY. If the people don’t control their local government, it’s not because the State is too weak—it’s because the people have chosen to be. 4. The problem with out-of-control local government is not the absence of a dominating State. It’s a complacent, passive, checked-out citizenry. 5. You don’t fix a petty tyrant by handing power to a bigger one. Correcting the problem of an out of control local government through an overpowering State is simply trading one tyrant for another. It is not a solution—it’s a surrender. The People are the only source of and the only cure for government.

@BucyForTexas - Rep. John Bucy III

WATCH: Texas Republican ADMITS he doesn’t believe in local control… “Do you believe in local control?” “No.” https://t.co/GRI0KarqJ0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 blames local control and disagreement. Speaker 1 says no, believing the state should be in control. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 thinks Deer Park should have the option to save taxpayer money. Speaker 1 says no, stating the voters elected them to this body. Speaker 0 asks if that means overriding their city council. Speaker 1 responds, "Absolutely."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you blame local control and local disi you don't? Speaker 1: Not really. No. Not even. I believe the state Speaker 0: So you don't think Deer Park should have the option? No. To do this if they want you to save your taxpayers money? Speaker 1: No, sir. There those voters vote elected me this this body, sir. Speaker 0: To override their city council? Absolutely.
RealKahall
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 10:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Did you know that no federal judge has a true lifetime appointment? The Constitution states that judges hold office only "during good behavior," making their position conditional. We've been led to believe we can't question judges, but that's a misconception. It's crucial to recognize our power and responsibility to hold them accountable. I urge you to watch the video and understand why questioning federal judges is our duty. Let's wake up, speak out, and demand Congress act according to the Constitution. For more information, visit LibertyFirstSociety.com.

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

🚨 Did you know? 🚨 No federal judge has a lifetime appointment—because “lifetime appointment” is NOWHERE in the Constitution! 🔎 Article III, Section 1 says judges hold office only “during good behavior.” That means their position is conditional—not guaranteed for life! Yet we’ve reached an age of judicial absurdity where we’re rebuked for questioning judges—when the Constitution demands it! The REAL scandal is that we’ve been deceived into thinking we’re powerless. We are NOT powerless! But deception keeps us silent. 📺 Watch this video NOW and learn WHY questioning federal judges is our Constitutional duty! 🔥 It’s time to wake up, speak out and Demand Congress Act according to the Constitution! 🔥 👉 If this makes you as furious as it makes me—arm yourself with the truth and the tools to take action at http://LibertyFirstSociety.com! #ConstitutionMatters #JudicialAccountability #GoodBehavior #LibertyFirst #QuestionFederalJudges

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thomas Jefferson warned that the federal judiciary could become oppressive, yet Americans are deceived into believing federal judges are beyond question. According to Article 3, judges hold office during "good behavior," which implies scrutiny. However, some judges exhibit behavior far outside these terms. Judge Jay Thomas Martin believes the Constitution means only what he says it means. Judge Royal Ferguson has claimed authority over the U.S. military and threatened a defendant with jail and death for non-compliance. Judge Dick Posner sees no value in judges studying the Constitution. Justice Neil Gorsuch finds it demoralizing to criticize a federal judge's integrity or motives. Questioning a judge's intentions, morality, and honesty is not immoral, but a duty of every citizen. The Constitution requires questioning judges, and anyone denying this right should be held suspect. Failure to do so risks America becoming totalitarian.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are certain things in America that can be unforeseen, but we have a problem in America that was foretold. Thomas Jefferson said the great object of my fear is the federal judiciary. He said that body like gravity ever acting with noiseless foot, gaining ground step by step, and holding what it gains is engulfing insidiously the special governments into the jaws of that which feeds them. He warned us that the federal government would become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated because of the federal judiciary. There is this deception that is overtaking America, an idea implanted in the psyche of the people that we are not allowed to question federal judges. That is destructive to the liberty of the people. That is contrary to the foundation of America, and that is contrary to the constitution of The United States. Article three, section section one clause two reads, judges both of the supreme and inferior courts shall hold their offices during good behavior. We are to question behavior. Their behavior is the term of their employment. And yet we have federal judges who act so far outside those terms that to say it was bad behavior would be a gross understatement. Jay Thomas Martin in Kansas declares the constitution is not credible in his courtroom and that the constitution doesn't mean anything unless he says it means. He says the constitution means what I say it means. This is a problem when those who are limited by the constitution can determine its own meaning. This is not someone who is to apply justice, not someone who is defend the constitution. This is someone who manipulates it for their own cause. Royal Ferguson in Western Texas declares in a civil case that he has the authority and control of the US Army, the Navy, the Marines, and the Air Force, and the US Marshals to effectuate his orders. When a defendant in his courtroom expressed a desire to appeal judge Royal Ferguson's order, judge Royal Ferguson says, if you don't comply with my order, it is punishable by lots of dollars, jail, and death. How is it that we have federal judges acting in such bad behavior that they no longer feel compelled to defend the constitution. Judge Dick Posner says I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, or even seconds studying the constitution. This is bad behavior. I want you to hear in your own ears the words of Supreme Court justice Neil Gorsuch. Speaker 1: But senator, when you attack the integrity or honesty or independence of a judge, their motives, as we sometimes hear, senator, I know the men and women of the federal judiciary, a lot of them. I know how hard their job is, how much they often give up to do it, the difficult circumstances in which they do it. It's a lonely job too. I'm not asking for any crocodile tears or anything like that. I'm just saying I know these people and I know how decent they are. And when anyone criticizes the honesty or integrity of the motives of a federal judge. Well, I find that disheartening. I find that demoralizing because I know the truth. Anyone including the president of United States? Anyone is anyone. Because no person is above the law, including the president of The United States. That's right, senator. Speaker 0: Of supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch, who shockingly declares that it is demoralizing, he criticize the intentions, motivations, or honesty of a federal judge. He even makes the implication that to question a federal judge's intentions, motivations, or honesty is an unlawful act. No, mister Gorsuch. Questioning the intention, the morality, and the honesty of a judge is not an immoral act. It is the duty of every citizen of The United States. It is the duty of every person living under this constitutional republic, and it is absolutely within the job description of every congressman that sits Washington DC. These judges hold their positions based on good behavior alone. How do you judge their good behavior? But by judging their intentions, their morality, and their honesty. Honesty, when we eliminate the possibility of even criticizing a judge, then we establish through error, deception, and distortion that these judges do not have their appointments based on good behavior. We need to start upholding the constitution as people. We need to start demanding that we question. Not questioning demanding the questioning of a judge. The constitution requires us to question a judge, and we need to hold suspect anyone regardless of political party or ideology. We need to hold suspect any person who denies us our right to question a judge and remove them for bad behavior. America will become as venal and oppressive as a totalitarian kingdom if we do not wake up, follow the constitution, and start questioning these federal judges. Whether you be the plumber down the street or the president of The United States, you have a duty and an obligation to question the intentions, the motivations, and the honesty of a federal judge. It's their only term of employment.
Enroll Today! Enroll Today! libertyfirstsociety.com
RealKahall
Posted - March 12, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Saved - March 12, 2025 at 4:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many people wonder about the fate of federal employees if unconstitutional executive agencies are shut down. I have a constitutional and practical solution. For over a decade, I've advocated for closing these agencies, arguing that powers not delegated to the federal government belong to the states, as stated in the Tenth Amendment. By transitioning responsibilities to state agencies, current federal workers can retain their jobs. This shift would also allow for a significant reduction in federal tax collection, empowering states to manage these functions more effectively and ensuring greater accountability.

@RealKahall - KrisAnne Hall, LibertyAddict

Many people ask, where will all these federal employees go if unconstitutional executive agencies are shut down? I have a constitutional and practical solution. For over a decade, I’ve advocated for the closure of these agencies, and in that time, I’ve developed a strategy that is both effective and constitutionally sound. The Tenth Amendment is clear: any power not delegated to the federal government is reserved for the states. That includes education, healthcare, housing, environmental regulation, and firearms policy—none of which were ever legitimate federal powers. These agencies should have always operated at the state level, not under federal control. By restoring these responsibilities to the states, the workers currently employed in unconstitutional federal agencies won’t be left without jobs—they will simply transition to their rightful place within state agencies. This shift comes with another major benefit: because we will no longer fund these agencies at the federal level, the federal government should reduce tax collection by over 50%, allowing states to retain the revenue needed to manage these functions properly. This keeps power closer to the people, where it belongs, and allows for greater oversight and accountability at the state level. This is the constitutional, practical, and fiscally responsible solution to a problem that should never have existed in the first place.

View Full Interactive Feed