TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RealLindellTV
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that in a new interview, Patrick Byrne claims leaked emails show Jack Smith and Merrick Garland planned mass political trials modeled on Italy’s Maxi Trials, aiming to prosecute up to 1,000 opponents at once in stadiums, on camera. “They never thought they'd lose November.” Byrne says federal agencies and Stanford coordinated to suppress dissent, censor medical info, and control the 2020 narrative. “Everything they accused others of doing, they were actually planning themselves.”
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
BREAKING: Emails Reveal Jack Smith and Merrick Garland Planned Mass Show Trials Inspired by Mafia Cases In a new interview, @PatrickByrne claims leaked emails show Jack Smith and Merrick Garland were planning mass political trials modeled after Italy’s Maxi Trials, aiming to prosecute up to 1,000 political opponents at once in stadiums, on camera. “They never thought they'd lose November,” Byrne said. “They were planning it in advance. It was a full-blown act of war on the American Republic.” Byrne pointed to alleged coordination between federal agencies and academic institutions, including Stanford, to suppress political dissent, censor medical information, and control the narrative around the 2020 election. “Everything they accused others of doing, they were actually planning themselves.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Emails have surfaced between Jack Smith and Merrick Garland, where it turns out they were planning trials like Stalin ran or the Maxi trials in Italy where they tried 250 mafia figures together. They're gonna try a thousand of us altogether in a stadium on camera and send us off to be liquidated. It was crazy what they had. And the emails, they were already planning it. They had no expectation of losing this last November. They found this in the bag.
On the bright side, what I found is that it's very easy to figure out what they did because whatever they're accusing you of doing, that's what they were actually working on. That's how they became experts on all of it. So it really makes it easy to put together their rap sheets in that context. Leticia James is just one blaring example of that mindset here. So where do you think this is all headed right now then? So, how do you think it's gonna roll out? And who's domino number three?
I think that we are have to I've I'm an outsider. I don't know any more than the next monkey, but what I would do is we have to, at a geopolitical level, mission one and two have to overthrow the governments of Venezuela and Cuba. None of them can survive. This was an act of war that was successful. They overthrew our republic. This was successful. It's a freaking miracle. We were never supposed to get out from under that. They cannot survive. This was a six act of war that eliminated our country. So that's and domestic have to, this all has to be exposed. We've got to this all has to be exposed. And all the parts of society, we need to have almost like a truth and reconciliation where a lot of people who took part in what was basically a Bolshevik revolution have to be exposed. And there there are people you know, there's a 120 federal officers from the CIA and the FBI who went out to Stanford, joined the Stanford Internet Observatory, and took part in a mass censorship industrial complex against the American people.
In which case all kinds of medical information was suppressed, which got people killed as well as they supported this political coup. I don't think it's a coincidence that that happened just when it did. And they suppressed any information about the elections. Those people took part in a coup. The professors who took part in it, in a way with pleading, we're just idiotic professors who read too many Herbert Marcuse underlined it too. The people who swore an oath to the constitution at some point in their life and took part in that, I believe should be hung from the Golden Gate in full daylight, left to sunset, and then their bodies disposed at sea so that American soil isn't polluted by the corpse corpses of people who took part in such a program. That was the overthrow of The United States Of America, and there were people who swore an oath to the constitution who took part in it. And that's what really should If I were the president, probably, I would let all that machinery grind on. And at the last moment, I'd probably sign and send them to some island in Hawaii for five years and say, everyone just cool this hell off. We're all just gonna cool off.
You guys betrayed the country by all rights. You should be hung. But what we're gonna do is send you this we're gonna take over some resort in Oahu at the tip of wire. We'll just send you there for, like, five years. Everybody shut up. Stay off social media. Be nicer?
The Point Barrel, Alaska, I was thinking would be a little bit more appropriate, but that's alright. I mean on top of Island 2. Aleutian Island. Yeah. And just say we don't wanna hear from you for five years. You're gonna be well fed, take care of. Your tennis game's gonna be great. It's not gonna be, you know, it's gonna be prison cells. You can live like a college dorm. But, literally, the US should send them off for, like, four or five years just and not hear from them.
They overthrew our country. And that's probably what really should I think should that or some kind of peace and reconciliation, but everything has to be exposed. Think of all the institutions from all these things that they used to throw in our face become our weapons. The idea that 60 judges looked at this and didn't see anything becomes our point, not their point. How corrupt is the system? Now once it's all proven and exposed to them, how corrupt is the system? 60 judges looked at this and saw nothing. That's how corrupt and weak and ineffective the system is. So all these points become points in our favor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Emails have surfaced between Jack Smith and Merrick Garland, where it turns out they were planning trials like Stalin ran or the Maxi trials in Italy where they tried 250 mafia figures together. They're gonna try a thousand of us altogether in a stadium on camera and send us off to be liquidated. It was crazy what they had. And the emails, they were already planning it. They had no expectation of losing this last November.
They had they they found this in the bag.
Speaker 1: On the bright side, what I found is that it's very easy to figure out what they did because whatever they're accusing you of doing, that's what they were actually working on. That's how they became experts on all of it. So it really makes it easy to put together their rap sheets in that context. I mean, Leticia James is just one blaring example of, of that, mindset here. So where do you, where do you think this is all headed right now then?
So, how do you think it's gonna roll out? And who's domino number three?
Speaker 0: I think that we are have to I've I'm an outsider. I don't know any more than the next monkey, but what I would do is we have to, at a geopolitical level, mission one and two have to overthrow the governments of Venezuela and Cuba. None of them can survive. This was an act of war that was successful. They overthrew our republic.
This was successful. It's a freaking miracle. We were never supposed to get out from under that. They cannot survive. This was a six a act of war that eliminated our that almost eliminated our country.
So that's and number and domestic have to, this all has to be exposed. We've got to this all has to be exposed. And all the parts of society, we need to have almost like a truth and reconciliation where a lot of people who took part in what was basically a Bolshevik revolution have to be exposed. And there there are people you know, there's a 120 federal officers from the CIA and the FBI who went out to Stanford, joined the Stanford Internet Observatory, and took part in a mass censorship industrial complex against the American people
Speaker 1: in which case
Speaker 0: all kinds of medical information was suppressed, which got people killed as well as they supported this political coup. I don't think it's a coincidence that that happened just when it did. And they suppressed any information, as you know, about the elections. Those people took part in a coup. The professors who took part in it, in a way with pleading, we're just idiotic professors who read too many Herbert Marcuse underlined it too.
The people who swore an oath to the constitution at some point in their life and took part in that, I believe should be hung from the golden gate in full daylight, left to sunset, and then their bodies disposed at sea so that American soil isn't polluted by the corpse corpses of people who took part in such a program. That was the overthrow of The United States Of America, and there were people who swore an oath to the constitution who took part in it. And that's what really should If I were the president, probably, I would let all that machinery grind on. And at the last moment, I'd probably sign and send them to some island in Hawaii for five years and say, everyone just cool this hell off. We're all just gonna cool off.
You guys betrayed the country by all rights. You should be hung. But what we're gonna do is send you this we're gonna take over some resort in Oahu at the tip of wire. We'll just send you there for, like, five years. Everybody shut up.
Stay off social
Speaker 1: media. Be nicer?
Speaker 0: Well, Mary, it's one here. Be nicer. Say that again?
Speaker 1: The Point Barrel, Alaska, I was thinking would be a little bit more appropriate, but that's alright. I mean on top of Island 2.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Aleutian Island. Yeah. Something like that. And just say we don't wanna hear from you for five years.
You're gonna be well fed, take care of. Your tennis game's gonna be great. It's not gonna be you know, it's gonna be prison cells. You can live like a college dorm. But, literally, the The US should send them off for, like, four or five years just and not hear from them.
They overthrew our country. They and that's probably what really should I think should that or some kind of peace and reconciliation, but everything has to be exposed. Think of all the institutions from you know, all these things on our that they used to throw in our face become our weapons. The idea that 60 judges looked at this and didn't see anything becomes our point, not their point. How corrupt is the system?
Now once it's all proven and exposed to them, how corrupt is the system? 60 judges looked at this and saw nothing. That's how corrupt and weak and ineffective the system is. So all these points become points in our favor.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Arkansas AG charged Col. Conrad Reynolds, a decorated Army veteran who led Independence County’s move to hand-counted paper ballots, with a rarely enforced misdemeanor for alleged "exit polling violations." He faces booking tomorrow at 9 AM and calls it political payback. National figures decry GOP lawfare, with Reynolds linked to Trump’s election-security efforts. Voters approved paper ballots by 63%.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
BREAKING: Arkansas AG Files Charges Against Col. Conrad Reynolds - Conservatives Call It GOP Lawfare Decorated Army veteran Col. Conrad Reynolds is under criminal prosecution after leading Independence County’s successful vote to return to hand-counted paper ballots. He now faces a rarely enforced misdemeanor over so-called "exit polling violations." Reynolds will report for booking tomorrow at 9AM. He calls it political payback: “They’re terrified of losing control of the election system.” National backlash is mounting: @realMikeLindell: “Colonel Reynolds is a hero.” @GenFlynn: “GOP lawfare… Sarah Huckabee, stop this persecution.” @SidneyPowell1: “This is ridiculous and obviously lawfare.” @RogerJStoneJr: “Why is Arkansas targeting a patriot pushing for paper ballots?” @ColonelReynolds, who holds a top secret clearance and will soon be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has worked closely with @realDonaldTrump’s team on election security. Why is a red state criminalizing election reform its own voters approved by 63%?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin faces growing scrutiny after filing charges against Colonel Conrad Reynolds, the decorated army veteran who led Independence County’s vote to return to hand counted paper ballots. Prosecutors accuse him of violating "exit polling laws," a rarely enforced misdemeanor, after organizing a ballot referendum that overwhelmingly passed with 63% of voters choosing paper ballots over machines. Reynolds, soon to be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has been a national leader in election reform, working closely with members of President Trump’s team in Washington on election security and vulnerabilities in voting systems. He continues to hold a top secret security clearance, which includes routine polygraph examinations. Reynolds says the prosecution is politically motivated and that the "establishment is trying to stop the paper ballot movement before it spreads to other counties. They're terrified of losing control of the election system," end quote.
The controversy raises a broader question inside Arkansas: why would a Republican administration led by governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders oppose the very hand counted paper ballot system that grassroots conservatives overwhelmingly supported? State officials have not publicly responded. The case has drawn sharp national criticism. Mike Lindell said, "please share." Reynolds is described as a hero and is claimed to be "guilty of trying to save our country and get to paper ballots hand counted." General Michael Flynn wrote on x, "this is GOP law fair, and it must end." Sarah Huckabee, please step in and stop this ridiculous persecution. Attorney Sydney Powell posted, "what the hell? Sarah Huckabee, this prosecution is ridiculous and obviously lawfare." Attorney general Tim Griffin, "exit polling is not election engineering." Political strategist Roger Stone shared, "top MAGA leaders are asking governor Sarah Huckabee why Arkansas indicted colonel Conrad Reynolds, a proponent of paper ballots." Reynolds’ attorney, Chris Corbett, calls the prosecution political payback, saying, "it's law fair, targeting a decorated army veteran because he's been effective." Reynolds has "worked tirelessly to strengthen election security in Arkansas and across the nation, and now he's being punished for it," end quote.
Reynolds will appear tomorrow morning at 9AM at the Independence Courthouse in Bateville, Arkansas to be booked, fingerprinted, and photographed, an image that his supporters say will symbolize courage in the growing national paper ballot movement. Reporting at the White House for Lindell TV, Kara Kashtanova.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Arkansas attorney general Tim Griffin is under growing scrutiny after filing charges against decorated army veteran, colonel Conrad Reynolds, the man who led Independence County's vote to return to hand counted paper ballots. National conservative leaders say it looks like GOP lawfare inside a red state. Reynolds is expected to report to the Independence County Courthouse tomorrow morning for booking. Prosecutors accuse him of violating, quote, exit polling laws, a rarely enforced misdemeanor, after organizing a ballot referendum that overwhelmingly passed with 63% of voters choosing paper ballots over machines. Colonel Reynolds, soon to be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has been a national leader in election reform.
He has worked closely with members of president Trump's team in Washington DC on election security and national defense vulnerabilities in voting systems. Reynolds continues to hold a top secret security clearance, which includes routine polygraph examinations. Reynolds says that the prosecution is politically motivated and the, quote, establishment is trying to stop the paper ballot movement before it spreads to other counties. They're terrified of losing control of the election system, end quote. The controversy is raising a broader question inside Arkansas.
Why would a Republican administration led by governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders oppose the very hand counted paper ballot system that grassroot conservatives overwhelmingly supported? State officials have not publicly responded. The case has drawn sharp national criticism. Mike Lindell said, please share. Colonel Reynolds is a hero and is guilty of trying to save our country and get to paper ballots hand counted.
General Michael Flynn wrote on x, this is GOP law fair, and it must end. Sarah Huckabee, please step in and stop this ridiculous persecution. Attorney Sydney Powell posted, what the hell? Sarah Huckabee, this prosecution is ridiculous and obviously lawfare. Attorney general Tim Griffin, exit polling is not election engineering.
Were it anyone other than an advocate for hand counted ballots, you would have ignored it. Political strategist Roger Stone shared a video captioned, quote, top MAGA leaders are asking governor Sarah Huckabee why Arkansas indicted colonel Conrad Reynolds, a proponent of paper ballots. Reynolds attorney Chris Corbett calls the prosecution political payback. He said, quote, it's law fair, targeting a decorated army veteran because he's been effective. Colonel Reynolds has worked tirelessly to strengthen election security in Arkansas and across the nation, and now he's being punished for it, end quote.
Reynolds will appear tomorrow morning at 9AM at the Independence Courthouse in Bateville, Arkansas to be booked, fingerprinted, and photographed, an image that his supporters say will symbolize courage in the growing national paper ballot movement. Reporting at the White House for Lindell TV, I'm Kara Kashtanova.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dominion Voting Systems was sold to Know Inc, now controlling voter registration, poll books, tabulators, and election night reporting. I’m told the rebrand won’t fool anyone—the DNA of Dominion remains. Jessica Pollema on the Mike Lindell Show cites ties to Venezuelan interference and whistleblower-backed evidence at ElectionCrimeBureau.com. Same actors, same systems, new name. End-to-end control is now in one company.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
BREAKING: Dominion Voting Systems Sold, Rebranded as “Liberty Vote” Dominion has been quietly sold to Know Inc, a company already entrenched in U.S. elections. Now, Know Inc controls everything: - Voter registration - Poll books - Tabulators - Election night reporting This rebrand won’t fool anyone paying attention. The DNA of Dominion is still inside these machines. Election watchdog Jessica Pollema joined the Mike Lindell Show to break it all down - including disturbing ties to Venezuelan election interference and whistleblower-backed evidence you can see at http://ElectionCrimeBureau.com. Same actors. Same systems. New name. End-to-end control of our elections is now in the hands of one company.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The segment covers daily developments in Washington, DC, including the late-week announcement that Dominion Voting Systems was sold to No Inc., with Dominion products rebranded as Liberty Vote. It also features Jessica Palaima, head of the South Dakota canvassing group, an election integrity effort. No Inc, already operating as KnowInc and having previously acquired b pro, provides poll book software, election night reporting, and data services; the Dominion purchase fills a tabulator gap and makes No Inc an end-to-end service provider for election systems. This end-to-end control spans the election record chain of custody—from voter registration and voter history in poll books to tabulation and reporting. References include electioncrimebureau.com and stolenelections.com, with evidence from Gary Burnson and Martin Rodale, and Ralph Bozzolo's account of a Venezuela-based investigation; whistleblowers from Venezuela are cited as having engaged in manipulation of elections in the U.S.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But that's not the case anymore in Washington DC. There's something happening every single day, even on the weekends under the Trump administration. And, one of the things that happened just late this week, that was a recent announcement, is a big news item, and it deals with the sale of Dominion Voting Systems to a company called No Inc. And, you know, I'm gonna be joined for this segment and another segment talking about something else that has been discovered out in South Dakota by a very special lady by the name of Jessica Palaima. Jessica heads up the SD canvassing group out in South Dakota.
It's election integrity group that's been bird dogging what's happening in our elections. And, and so she's gonna be joining us on on that discussion here. But let's go through, if you could, we'll just pop in and, see the what actually happened, regarding this this sale of Dominion to a company called No Inc. Check out item number one there. We'll see here's a list of services that are provided.
Okay. Here's the okay. So yesterday, the announcement was made that Dominion Voting Systems was sold, and they're rebranding all the Dominion products as Liberty Vote. Like, that's gonna fool people that have been paying attention to this for a long time. It's an attempt weak attempt at rebranding, their election systems.
It's still the same DNA inside these Dominion Voting systems. And if you go to electioncrimebureau.com, click on evidence, you're gonna see, links to evidence from, folks like Gary Burnson and, Martin Rodale, and and and book stolen elections. I strongly encourage you to dig into that. I even as somebody who wrote my own book on the elections, I wrote mine from the outside looking in. This book by Ralph Bozzolo, I'll tell you, they what they did is it's based on investigation performed by Gary Burnson and Martin Rodel, and it's this investigation occurred over a couple decades.
They've solicited and obtained whistleblowers from within the election system in Venezuela, and many of these same actors that were used to steal elections in Venezuela Per the testimony of these whistleblowers, they are now sitting here in The United States and have actively engaged in manipulation of our elections as well, and they're pretty good at documenting the receipts. There's also more information at their website, stolenelections.com. You can get all that from electioncrimebureau.com. But that that purchase of Dominion by No Inc, was kind of interesting because No Inc already provides a wide variety of services, either as KnowInc or as another company that they bought, previously, about a few years ago called b pro. And KnowInc, prior to this purchase, provided poll book software.
They provide election night reporting services. They provide a lot of different, data services. And the and and it seems like what their they purchase a Dominion was intended to kinda fill in the tabulator gap that they had in their service portfolio. So now effectively, No Inc. Becomes an end to end service provider for election systems, which means that they control every single election record in the election record chain of custody from voter registration systems to voter history data in the poll books to the tabulation of the votes on election day to the reporting of those votes via their election night reporting services, they now have an end to end solution.
Home | Election Crime Bureau
Help Save Our Country - God has blessed me with a platform to be a voice for freedom.
electioncrimebureau.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been investigating the Epstein case for over a year, revealing inconsistencies from officials and sharing insider accounts. I believe the recent victims’ press conference highlights how the issue is being politicized, but the real concern is a systemic cover-up. The government and intelligence agencies prioritize their protection over transparency. While everyday Americans face consequences, those connected to Epstein evade accountability. I think this could be the moment that brings Americans together against corruption, provided Republicans take action.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
O’Keefe: Government Will “Die Before Being Transparent” on Epstein For over a year, James O’Keefe and @OKeefeMedia have released investigative reports on the Epstein case - exposing inconsistencies with @AGPamBondi, uncovering inside accounts from investigators, and sharing evidence from Epstein’s island properties. @JamesOKeefeIII says the victims’ press conference showed the issue is being politicized, but the deeper problem is systemic cover-up: “The government and intelligence agencies will die before they’re transparent. The system wants to protect itself.” He warned that while ordinary Americans face raids and arrests, the powerful in Epstein’s orbit have escaped accountability. O’Keefe believes this could be the issue that finally unites America against corruption - if Republicans are willing to act.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussing the Epstein case, speakers note few Republicans present: "There didn't seem to be a lot of Republicans. It was free DC people and believe all women signs." They say it looks "mostly left wing" and that the issue is used politically: "they seem to be using this for as a political thing." The rollout is described as disorganized: "I don't think it was handled well." They suggest "there seems to be something hidden from public view" and that "the government" protects "their sources and methods." On Pam Bondi, "I haven't done that story." The speaker recalls Epstein Island: "Footage from the time of the raid... a lot of people that he worked with." DOJ says "there is no culpability of any of these people." The talk hints at bipartisanship but "they're afraid of Donald Trump... There’s nothing to see here." They will "talk to Massey" and report from Capitol.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a mass press conference today for the victims of, all of this Epstein insanity. How do you see this panning out? Why don't you think there are more Republicans that are backing this?
Speaker 1: There didn't seem to be a lot of Republicans. It was free DC people and believe all women signs. They were talking about Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas as much as they were Epstein. It just seems to be mostly left wing people here from what I can gather. Why do I think that?
I I my perspective is that they seem to be using this for as a political thing. Yeah. But I do think there are some people that care about the survivors of abuse, obviously, but they're also mostly just political people from what I can gather.
Speaker 0: Yes. Now I'm curious to hear your thoughts on the whole sort of way this unraveled. We initially saw Pam Bondi at the White House release these binders to these influencers influencers phase phase one. One. There was never a phase two.
Why do you think this is all rolled out in such a disorganized fashion? Any thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: I don't think it was handled well. And we did that story on Pam Bondi where she was in the restaurant saying there's all these tapes of girl young girls. She said that privately before saying it publicly just wasn't handled well. Just the whole thing, why wasn't it handled well? That remains a mystery.
There seems to be something hidden from public view. If you wanna speak about it on a larger level, it seems to be that the government, that the administrative intelligence agencies wanna protect their sources and methods, and they will die before they're transparent about what's really going on and how they operate in this country. So there's a desire to protect the system. The system wants to protect itself. Mhmm.
It does not want any transparency because to be transparent is contrary to its stated purpose. That's my perspective.
Speaker 0: And you've done some digging into Pam Bondi. She has some interesting ties to Pfizer, I believe.
Speaker 1: I haven't done that story. I've maybe others have, but I can't speak to that. I've only did one story regarding the the speaking in a restaurant that she did.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Thank you for clearing that up. I know you did go to Epstein Island yourself. What did you find there?
Any insight into your discoveries?
Speaker 1: Footage from the time of the raid where they had images inside of his bedroom and blackboard and bedroom and speed dials on his phone, a lot of people that he worked with. The Department of Justice here saying that there is no culpability of any of these people, but it it stands to reason that if if he did something wrong, was someone in his orbit that also did something wrong, where they're given sweetheart deals. People want they want justice. They want they I've been held to justice. I've been arrested and raided by the FBI.
It seems like the people in power, nothing ever happens to them, and people are angry about it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think they are. And I think this is actually it could potentially be a very unifying issue to bring everyone together to expose the corruption in this swamp if we could just get some Republicans on board here, is why I think it's a missed opportunity. Would you agree?
Speaker 1: It it is, I intend to talk to congressman Massey. I'm trying to get to the bottom of things. This is a very interesting topic because I think it's the one bipartisan issue. It's not about Epstein. It's about what he represents.
Right. So I think more people are in agreement than they'd like to admit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. If you had to take any guesses, are there any two Republicans that you would suspect may end up coming forward to finally sign this bill into law and make this binding?
Speaker 1: I think they're afraid of Donald Trump. And Trump said, there's nothing to see here. Please move on. So people that's the leader of the party. So they're they're that's that's clearly but privately, people have told me that they didn't like that Trump said that.
Everyone was very upset that Trump said what he said about a month ago. They felt privately that he was gaslighting them. But they're not courageous to say that publicly. We'll see. I just got here.
We're gonna go into the Capitol Building. We're gonna talk to Massey and report what we find.
Speaker 0: Alright. We'll be looking forward to your report. James O'Keefe, thank you so much.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported live from the White House lawn to announce that the FBI has finally returned my phone after three years. I called it “3 years of nonsense,” emphasizing that the phone held personal memories and important business information. I pointed out that courts, including the Supreme Court, declined to review my case, and judges questioned why the FBI seized the physical phone instead of just copying its contents. I expressed that this was my livelihood taken for no reason and vowed to expose the truth, including bringing forward whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
BREAKING: Mike Lindell Says FBI Finally Returned His Phone After 3 Years Reporting live from the @WhiteHouse lawn, @realMikeLindell announced the @FBI has returned the phone they seized in 2022. Lindell called it “3 years of nonsense,” saying the phone contained personal memories and key business material. He reminded viewers that courts, including the Supreme Court, refused to review his case, while judges questioned why the FBI took the physical phone instead of simply copying its contents. “This was my livelihood. They took it for no reason,” Lindell said, vowing to expose what happened and bring forward Dennis Montgomery, the whistleblower behind his original election evidence.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking: FBI has delivered my phone back after three years of nonsense. They took my livelihood, the phone, the stuff in there. I had pictures of my grandkids when my dad passed away. I’ll do a show when I get back to Minnesota; it’s right there in the box like it never left back in the day. I brought it all the way up to the supreme court, the supreme court in one week. No. We're not gonna look at that. In Minnesota, the eighth circuit there. And those judges even asked the FBI and the government, why why don't you just make a copy of his phone? Why do you need the physical doubt the physical phone? And they also asked him, well, what do if you're looking for evidence, you're looking for stuff in there, where's the attorney client privilege? And they go, well, we're looking at that. So what do you look at it and say, uh-oh. We shouldn't have seen that. It's like being in a being in a courtroom and going, strike that, your honor. The jury already heard it. It’ll be interesting, but it’s interesting enough getting that back. We’re bringing Dennis Montgomery back to recount my original evidence; they suppress him and suppressing I think we're gonna get him on my show. Did Mike Lindell ever get his phone back? Nope. So now we can tell him, yes, he did. It's not so much it's Vanessa. It's more of how they took it and what they were really planning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got really quick breaking news for you, Vanessa.
Speaker 1: I'll take it.
Speaker 0: Just just in. This just in. I just got word from my office in Minnesota. The FBI has now delivered my phone back after three years, everybody. Three years of nonsense.
And you know what? You think I'm gonna let them go and just go, oh, thank you for my phone back. No. We're gonna dive into this because they took my livelihood, the phone, the stuff in there. I had pictures of my grandkids when my dad passed away.
I went and got we'll see what's still in there. We're gonna do when I do get back to Minnesota, I'm gonna do a show. The it's right there in the box like it never left back in the day. But what they did to it and what they did to take that for no reason now I don't know what what rights I have or whatever, but they I remember everybody. I brought it all the way up to the supreme court, the supreme court in in one week.
No. We're not gonna look at that. We're not gonna check that out. And then I brought it to Minnesota, the eighth circuit there. And those judges even asked the FBI and the government, why why don't you just make a copy of his phone?
Why do you need the physical doubt the physical phone? And they also asked him, well, what do if you're looking for evidence, you're looking for stuff in there, where's the attorney client privilege? And they go, well, we're looking at that. So what do you look at it and say, uh-oh. We shouldn't have seen that.
It's like being in a being in a a courtroom and going, strike that, your honor. The jury already heard it. Give me a break. You know? So it'll be interesting, but it's interesting enough getting that back.
You don't see it all over the news going, hey. Mike got his phone back. Mike was right. Everything he said about the election was ready. Everybody wait on it.
A 100% true. And, one of the things I wanna tell everybody too that I just wanna announce in your show, we are gonna bring bring you back. I'm gonna bring back Dennis Montgomery, who I recount my original evidence from. You guys, I think what we because they keep suppressing him and suppressing I think we're gonna get him on my show one of these days. We're gonna do a big advertisement, get him on there, and let be shown what they won't let be shown in that Colorado courtroom back in May, which, remember, they wanted to focus on Dennis, but they didn't want him in the courtroom.
They didn't want the evidence to be shown. Right? But yet they're trying to focus on machines. There's a lot of stuff going on.
Speaker 1: Well, Mike, I am so proud of you for getting your phone back. I know we've talked about it before, but for those who didn't know, right after that happened, president Trump had a rally, I think, a day later and or two later. And I was the first person to interview you, and I asked you one question to And ask what you went into extensive detail about how they took your phone. It should have never happened. How they did it was awful in my opinion.
But I'm so happy for you. People ask all the time, all the time, did Mike Lindell ever get his phone back? Nope. So now we can tell him, yes, he did. Right.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yes. He did. But you got it's not so much it's Vanessa. It's more of how they took it and what they were really planning.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that a federal appeals court has overturned the $5 million arbitration ruling against me, Mike Lindell, stating that the arbitrators exceeded their authority by altering the terms of my 2021 Cyber Symposium challenge on election integrity. This decision challenges the media narrative aimed at discrediting my claims about the 2020 election. I see this as a miracle and a significant validation of the data I presented. I’ll be live from the White House tomorrow with more updates. Your support for my ongoing legal fees is crucial.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
🚨 BREAKING: Mike Lindell Wins Appeal in $5M Election Data Challenge Case A federal appeals court has tossed out the $5 million arbitration ruling against @realMikeLindell, declaring the arbitrators overstepped their bounds by rewriting the terms of his 2021 Cyber Symposium election integrity challenge. This ruling directly undermines the media narrative used to discredit Lindell’s claims about the 2020 election. He calls the decision a “miracle” and a massive vindication of the data he presented - data the establishment tried to bury. @realMikeLindell will appear live from the @WhiteHouse tomorrow with more! The fight isn't over - support for his ongoing legal fees for election security is more critical than ever. Donate Now: GiveSendGo.com/MikeLindell
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe what's happening. I've called out Fox News for refusing to air my evidence, despite previously showcasing Dennis Montgomery's findings as the "biggest discovery ever." Just days after their $787M settlement with Dominion, I faced a $5M arbitration loss. It feels like they timed everything to undermine our election evidence. I had all the necessary records and footage. Plus, they sidelined Tucker Carlson right when he started questioning electronic voting machines, likely fearing he'd mention Dominion or Smartmatic.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
“You can’t make this up.” - Mike Lindell @realMikeLindell blasts @FoxNews for refusing to air his evidence even after once featuring Dennis Montgomery and calling it the “biggest discovery ever.” Days after Fox quietly settled with Dominion for $787M, headlines slammed Lindell with a $5M arbitration loss. “They timed it perfectly to discredit all our election evidence,” he said. “I had every cast vote record, every voter roll, camera angles, you name it.” Lindell says Fox “benched” @TuckerCarlson just as he began questioning electronic voting machines: “They were afraid he’d say Dominion or Smartmatic on air.” Help Secure Our Elections and Save Our Country, Donate Here: GiveSendGo.com/MikeLindell
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke at the White House today about key issues like election integrity, the DOJ's response to January 6, and the recent assassination attempt. I reassured reporters that the DOJ is reviewing these matters. I also mentioned President Trump's executive order on requiring proof of citizenship to vote, which is currently blocked by a federal judge. I expressed my frustration, stating, “The courts don’t care what Congress said or what the Constitution says; they’re just imposing their own Marxist agenda on the country.”
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
Stephen Miller Speaks at White House on DOJ Priorities and Election Integrity Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller addressed reporters today, responding to voter concerns about election integrity, the DOJ's handling of January 6, and the lack of transparency surrounding the recent assassination attempt. @StephenM reaffirmed that the DOJ is actively reviewing all three issues and highlighted President Trump's recent executive order requiring proof of citizenship to vote—an order currently blocked by a federal judge. “The courts don’t care what Congress said or what the Constitution says,” Miller stated. “They’re just imposing their own Marxist agenda on the country.” Follow Lindell TV for more coverage.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president's voters are concerned about the 2020 election, the voting situation, and the assassination attempt. The Department of Justice is working on these issues and will hopefully have an update soon. The president signed an executive order, the most comprehensive election integrity order ever issued, including a requirement to verify citizenship to vote. A district court judge lawlessly intervened and enjoined that requirement, even though Congress passed a law making it a felony for non-citizens to vote. Radical rogue judges are imposing their own Marxist agenda, disregarding Congress and the Constitution. The Department of Justice is investigating all issues related to January 6th. The Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, FBI Director, Ed Martin, and a new DC Attorney are working to ensure accountability and justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we talk to the president's voters, they bring up a couple issues. One, it's been three months, and they still haven't gotten down to the twenty twenty election. The they're concerned about the, you know, the whole voting situation, and they also wanna know about what happened to the the assassination attempt. And they're and they
Speaker 1: All those are all great questions.
Speaker 0: Follow-up on that? They're really concerned.
Speaker 1: Those are all great questions. The Department of Justice, of course, is working on all three of the things that you just mentioned. And, hopefully, we'll have a further update soon. I can tell you on election integrity that the president recently signed an executive order that was the most comprehensive election integrity order that was ever issued. And as you may recall, that included in a requirement to verify citizenship to vote.
Another example where a district court judge lawlessly intervened, enjoined that requirement. Now think about this. Congress passed the law. Again, Congress passed the law making it a crime, a felony for non citizens to vote. And yet a judge has enjoined the executive branch from enforcing and upholding that statutory requirement.
So the courts, the radical rogue judges, they don't care what congress said. They don't care about what the constitution says. They're just imposing their own Marxist agenda on the whole country.
Speaker 0: On January 6. They wanna follow-up on January 6.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, the again, the Department of Justice is investigating all of the issues that you mentioned. I wish I had a full update for you now, but I can assure you that our attorney general, our deputy attorney general, our FBI director, now Ed Martin, at the, weaponization working group will all be and, of course, we put up a new DC Attorney. We'll all be diligently working on ensuring accountability and justice.
Speaker 0: Yes, Here's a question. Tom Homan, you
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a breaking story about Catholic Charities receiving $1.4 billion in taxpayer funds to process migrant children but failing to conduct background checks on adult sponsors. Joe Rossi highlighted that the vetting process was abandoned, allowing anyone to pick up the children quickly. He is calling for an independent investigation into the situation and the allocation of funds. I encourage others to email Archbishop Broglio to demand accountability. You can find the full report on Lindell TV.
@RealLindellTV - LindellTV
BREAKING: Catholic Charities Tied to Border Child Trafficking Scheme Catholic Charities took $1.4B in taxpayer funds to process migrant children — while skipping background checks for adult sponsors. Joe Rossi tells Lindell TV: “They stopped vetting. It didn’t matter who picked the kids up — just move them fast.” He’s demanding an independent investigation into how this happened and where the money went. 📢 Take action: Email Archbishop Broglio at executive@USCCB.org to demand accountability. Full report now on Lindell TV.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Catholic Charities USA, the thirteenth largest US charity, received $1.4 billion in government support out of its $4.7 billion in revenues. Joe Rossi, a devout Catholic, is demanding an independent investigation into where this money went, alleging the organization was incentivized to quickly move children who entered the US illegally through Biden's open border into the care of any adult.
Rossi claims that background checks and ID requirements for adult caregivers were waived to expedite placement. According to Rossi, an HHS employee said they prioritized avoiding lawsuits for border backups over potential trafficking risks. Rossi's communications with San Antonio Catholic Charities led him to believe that there was a very relaxed process, with no vetting being done. Rossi is calling for accountability for those involved in this "human trafficking nightmare" and reform within the Catholic Church.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what's becoming a disturbing story. Recent revelations by investigators prove that Catholic charities accepted a ludicrous amount of US taxpayer money to basically traffic children who had entered The US illegally through Joe Biden's open Southwest border. According to Forbes, Catholic Charities USA was the thirteenth largest US charity last year. Of its total 4,700,000,000.0 in revenues, Catholic Charities received 1,400,000,000.0 from government support compared with a billion in private donations and 2,200,000,000.0 in other income. But one man, our next guest, Joe Rossi, himself a devout Catholic, is taking on this monster.
Rossi sent a series of emails to Catholic charities demanding an independent investigation be conducted to determine where the absurdly large amount of taxpayer dollars the NGO received went. Interestingly, Rossi has learned that several changes are made to the in which the NGO vetted adult caregivers who were supposedly coming to pick up the undocumented children in their care. Quote, he found that effective immediately background checks required well as as well as requirements for obtaining identification for adult household members and alternate adult care caregivers identified in a sponsored care plan are not required as a condition of release. That's because according to Rossi, Catholic Charities was paid more by the feds to move the children out of their care and into that of an adult, any adult, didn't matter, as quickly as possible. And Joe Rossi joins us now.
So, Joe, you you found out they were just moving them along to anybody to get them out, and they got incentivized to do so.
Speaker 1: Yes. This started back in, when the Biden administration opened the borders. There was a massive influx of unaccompanied children. And it became obvious that, they did not want to have legal troubles or PR battles with, unaccompanied children backing up at the border. So on March 31, they issued field guidance, number 11, which basically waived the requirement to vet sponsors.
So my data and all the research I've done is there was, an inadequate or no vetting process for these unaccompanied children that were flowing through these NGOs such as Catholic charities. And, obviously, that's very disturbing. And in one of my quotes and one of my documents I had, one of the HHS HHS employees told them down on the in the field down there when they were working these unaccompanied children that that you don't know. We don't get sued by traffickers. We just get sued if we back them up at the border, which told me there was a a tremendous effort to move these kids as quickly as possible regardless of the danger that they might be putting them in.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Cadillac Charities claims in a letter directly to you, right, Joe, that they weren't doing any anything untoward. Explain.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The well, this letter here is, from the bishop, that I've started out working with, and he referred me to several contacts if I had, you know, concerns of an individual that was in danger. My real question for the bishop was and that was great that he sent that. I I appreciate that. But what I really was asking him for was this independent investigation, and he really didn't take action on that.
But, my communication with San Antonio Catholic Charities led me to believe that it was a very, relaxed process, there was no vetting being done by the in inbound end of this logistics chain on who was bringing them in and then also from an unaccompanied children standpoint, where they were sending them and the validity of any vetting whatsoever, was very, very skeptical.
Speaker 0: So where does the investigation stand now? You called for an independent investigation. Where is it headed, and what do people need to do? How how how should they push for accountability?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that's the key is accountability. Obviously, the new administration, and I believe, is gonna do everything they can to help rescue these children, but, there's still some individuals, some groups that were part of this logistics human trafficking nightmare that need to be held accountable, and certainly some reform is gonna be needed in the Catholic church coming out of this.