TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RealMacReport
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: ABC’s Matt Gutman has apologized, saying he “deeply regrets” describing text messages between Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin and his transgender partner as “very touching.” https://t.co/MXMq89ARLw
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
NJ nurse Lexi Kuenzle has been suspended indefinitely without pay after calling out a doctor who allegedly "cheered" Charlie Kirk's death. The doctor was also suspended and is no longer listed on the hospital's website. https://t.co/z8htQh6Czd
Video Transcript AI Summary
“Are you fired? No. I'm not fired as of right now. Right now, I am suspended indefinitely unpaid. I walked into the nurse's station, learned about Charlie Kirk, and saw a man celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, saying he deserved it. He hated Charlie Kirk, and he had it coming to him. 'I'm a big fan of Charlie Kirk.' 'My first retweet in 2018 by it was like, my first blue check mark retweet was Charlie Kirk.' 'I was a couple years out of college and loved him ever since.' 'So I looked down at his badge... it says doctor.' 'And I said, you're a doctor?' 'I said, how is it how are you saying this as a doctor that someone deserved to die?'"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you fired? No. I'm not fired as of right now. Right now, I am suspended indefinitely unpaid. Why?
So I walked into the nurse's station, and I just had learned about Charlie Kirk. I saw this guy. I didn't know who he was at the time, and he was standing there celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk saying how he deserved it. He hated Charlie Kirk, and he had it coming to him. And You love Charlie Kirk.
You didn't just wear wear of him. I love fake. Yeah. Yeah. I'm a big fan of Charlie Kirk.
My first retweet in 2018 by it was, like, my first blue check mark retweet was Charlie Kirk. I was a couple years out of college and loved him ever since. You're aghast at this. And what'd you say? So I looked down at his badge because I didn't know, you know, what job he if he was a doctor or a nurse.
Never saw him. Never saw him before. I looked down. I see his badge, and it says doctor. And I said, you're a doctor?
I said, how is it how are you saying this as a doctor that someone deserved to die? I mean, to me, I was just mind blown.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is reportedly considering stepping down, seeking guarantees of immunity from any potential investigations when a future Trump administration takes office. https://t.co/NiK7DI2LWV
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that Kamala Harris’ campaign spent $2.6 million on private jets from October 1 to 17. The Federal Election Commission data shows nearly $2.2 million went to Private Jet Services Group in South Florida, and $430,000 to Advanced Aviation Team in Arlington, Va.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: Kamala Harris’ campaign blew $2.6M on private jets between Oct. 1 and Oct. 17 of her campaign. According to Federal Election Commission data, her campaign ponied up nearly $2.2 million to the south Florida-based company Private Jet Services Group, along with $430,000 to Arlington, Va.-based charter flight broker Advanced Aviation Team.
reSee.it AI Summary
I pointed out that Republicans often raise concerns about voting fraud only when they lose. Jim Jordan countered, calling the recent election a remarkable comeback. I asked why 2024 felt different from 2020, and he mentioned issues with mail-in voting and questioned Biden's voter turnout for Harris.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Dana Bash: "It seems to me that Republicans claim voting fraud and election integrity when you lose and not when you win." Rep. Jim Jordan: "No. This election was the greatest political comeback we've ever seen." Dana Bash: "Why was 2024 different from 2020 when Trump lost?" Rep. Jim Jordan: "There were concerns about 2020 with all the mail in voting. The biggest question is what happened to the 10 Million voters that Joe Biden got but didn't come up for Kamala Harris."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting fraud claims often arise from Republicans when they lose, not when they win. This recent election was a significant comeback, allowing voters to compare back-to-back administrations. Many preferred Trump's policies, such as safe streets, over the Democrats'.
In 2020, concerns arose about mail-in voting and lack of signature verification in states like Pennsylvania. The Democrats need to understand why 10 million voters who supported Biden didn't show up for Harris. Trump's numbers remained strong, while Democrats struggled due to a lack of vision and negative campaigning. Voters reacted against being labeled and targeted legally. Economic issues like gas prices and inflation also influenced their choice to support Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Voting fraud this time. It seems to me that Republicans claim voting fraud and election integrity when you lose and not when you win.
Speaker 1: No. I mean, again, as I said before, this election, I think, was the greatest political comeback we've ever seen. He did something that even Teddy Roosevelt couldn't do, for goodness sake. And the country
Speaker 0: But you say just a free and fair election?
Speaker 1: No. No. This this election you just interviewed the the Latino, I think, restaurant owner or a restaurant worker, and, he said he was tired of all the woke stuff. This election was real simple. You had back to back administrations.
We got something we very seldom get in administrations. We got something we very seldom get in American history, American and American politics. Back to back administrations now running for the top job, and people could do a direct comparison. And they said, we like what we had under president Trump versus
Speaker 0: But last time around
Speaker 1: We like the we like the safe streets versus the record Last
Speaker 0: time around, your your leader declared that there were problems with fraud.
Speaker 1: Versus the un the open board.
Speaker 0: Right. Those are those
Speaker 1: are policies. What this election was about.
Speaker 0: That's totally fair. But last time around, it wasn't so much about the policy differences or the personality differences. There were there was there were false claims about election fraud when Donald Trump lost. This time, Donald Trump won, and you think the election was free and fair. You see, there's a little bit of a
Speaker 1: No. I think the Democrats gotta ask, why why did we go from getting 81,000,000 to getting 70,000,000? What happened to those 10,000,000 people? Maybe they needed maybe it's not smart to run an election where you have no vision, the other side names?
Speaker 0: Do you believe that the 2024 election was free and fair?
Speaker 1: I do. I do.
Speaker 0: And why was it different from 2020 when he lost? Is that the only difference?
Speaker 1: No. Well, there were concerns about 2020 with all the mail in voting that happened. You know, Pennsylvania had, like, 2 point something million mail in ballots come in without any signature verification, which is required under Pennsylvania statute. So there were all kinds of concerns with how the 2020 election was
Speaker 0: carried out.
Speaker 1: But It was absolutely The biggest the biggest question Democrats need to ask is, what happened to the 10,000,000 voters that Joe Biden got that didn't come out for Kamala Harris? A bunch of president Trump's numbers were right up where they were in 2020, but the Democrats were much lower. I think it's because they had no vision, no record to run on, and they just wanted to call everyone names. Turns out when you when turns out when you when you you tell people, oh, you're a fascist, racist, deplorable, garbage. They don't like that.
And then when you use law fair to go after their candidate, they don't like that either. Well That's why they came out. So on top of the the economy, on top of the price of gas, top of the inflation We're out that's why they voted for president Trump. We're
Speaker 0: out of time. I
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m disappointed and insulted as a Howard alum by Kamala Harris’s behavior after her loss to Trump. I feel she lacked the decency to address her university or the nation, which reflects poorly on her character. Her actions show she's a sore loser, and while it’s painful for her and the Democrats, America might feel relieved. I believe her insecurity prevented her from surrounding herself with strong figures, leading to mistakes in her campaign, including relying too heavily on celebrity endorsements that didn’t resonate well.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Former White House staffer says Kamala Harris’s actions following her loss last night to President Donald Trump was “classless” and reveals she’s a “sore loser.” Barbara Heineback: "I am so disappointed and really insulted that I’m a Howard alum and that she didn’t have the decency to walk out and say to her, to her university, make a comment to the United States. Things were not looking well for her. It wasn’t completely over." "I mean, it shows us how classless she actually is, a sore loser. Even though it’s painful for her, for the Democrats, I think America might be relieved at recognizing and realizing they don’t have to put up with this any longer." Sky News host: "Why do you think she’s failed? What was the biggest mistake of the Democrat campaign?" Barbara Heineback: "She is so completely insecure that she could not have someone that bright around her to upstage her and outshine her. She made a lot of mistakes by bringing on all of Hollywood and Beyoncé and all of those people. But they always do that. Beyoncé wasn’t very happy."
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm disappointed that Kamala Harris didn't take the opportunity to address her university or the nation during this difficult time. Her lack of grace reflects poorly on her character. Many may feel relieved that this chapter is closing, as she has struggled as a candidate. The biggest mistake in her campaign was not selecting Shapiro, who is well-respected and could have strengthened her position. Instead, she surrounded herself with Hollywood figures, which didn't resonate well. The Democrats face a challenging future, potentially losing both the House and Senate. Notably, Obama and Michelle delayed their endorsement of her, indicating their reservations. If Republicans gain more seats, it may pave the way for a stronger Trump presidency moving forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's cross now to Barbara Honeyback, former Democrat White House starrer joining us live from Brisbane. Barbara, do you feel any disappointment that Kamala Harris hasn't been able to become the first, woman of color and first woman to be elected to the presidency?
Speaker 1: I am so disappointed and really insulted. I'm a Howard alum and that she didn't have the decency to walk out and say something to her, you know, to her university, make a comment to the United States. Things were not looking well for her. It wasn't completely over, but short of a miracle, we knew which way this was going. And that she didn't have some grace.
I mean, it it shows us how classless she actually is, a sore loser. And even though it's painful for her, for the Democrats, I think America might be relieved at recognizing and realizing they don't have to put up with this any longer. And if this is what they were walking into, maybe it's better that it gets, you know, cut at the nip right now. Well, it's she's such
Speaker 0: a poor candidate, Barbara. Years. Yep. She's such a poor candidate. Of course, she was a surprise pick, for vice president as the running mate for Joe Biden, but he said he was gonna pick a woman of color, and she got the gig.
She's never won an election of any substance. This would have been the first one if she did didn't get a vote when she contested the primaries. Why do you think she's failed? What was the biggest mistake of the Democrat campaign?
Speaker 1: The biggest mistake was her not selecting Shapiro. I mean, she had an ace, you know, an ace in the hole, and she didn't take that. Shapiro is so well respected, liked. He's doing an incredible job in Pennsylvania. And the reason she didn't take it is another part of that personality that, you know, eat through.
She is so completely insecure that she could not have someone that bright around her to upstage her and outshine her. And so this is why she didn't select him, I'm pretty sure. She made a lot of mistakes by bringing on all of Hollywood and Beyonce and all of those people.
Speaker 0: But they always do that.
Speaker 1: Beyonce wasn't very happy.
Speaker 0: They always do that.
Speaker 1: Wasn't happy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's it's pathetic. Now now you know the Democrats. You're connected to them. You've worked in the White House for Democrat presidents.
Tell us what they're gonna go through in coming days. They may lose the House and the Senate as well. They may have gone backwards in the House and and lose the senate. A very, very dark day for the democrats. Do you expect them to learn?
Do you expect serious recriminations?
Speaker 1: One of the things I noticed is or I really believe is gonna happen is that, you know, oh, we have to remember that Obama and Michelle did not come out to endorse her for about more than a week, about 10 days after all of the other elite democrats did, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, all of the others. But they didn't come out. And Obama really wanted to have a proper you know, go through the process of the primary and everything. Let the Democratic National Committee choose and select who they really wanted for a candidate. Obama has been telling people all along before she became vice president not to do this and not to jump to that.
Willie Brown as well, who, you know, the who had been the mayor of San Francisco. So give her a position somewhere, but not VP. No VP. People closer to her knew what was, you know, coming on. And so she they didn't listen to that.
The congress, I don't know which way it's going to go, but I think that, if we have a couple more Republicans in the senate to carry us through these next 4 years, but I think it's going to be easier for Trump than it was, you know, back in 2016.
Speaker 0: It could well be. He could be a much more powerful president than he was last time around. Thanks for joining us, Barb.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨BREAKING: Whistleblower tells Sen. Josh Hawley that Secret Service told agents who were working with the Butler rally, NOT to request for additional manpower resources for the rally & warned them, any such requests would be DENIED. https://t.co/LrIZACY07e
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨BREAKING: The Milwaukee Police Association endorses President Trump and J.D. Vance. Law enforcement organizations all over America understand that President Trump and VP Vance will have their backs. https://t.co/SqZYIP9k5I
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Robert Kiyosaki: Because of Biden, hamas terrorist cells are streaming into America. Biden and Kamala are the traitors to our country. https://t.co/ZLETPr2E1w
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wall Street and officials allegedly steal public service pensions, including those of military personnel and pilots. A book called "Who Stole My Pension" by Edward Sedell will reveal the facts.
A poll indicates 40% believe they'd be better off financially if Trump wins. Biden's actions, such as cutting the Keystone XL pipeline, allegedly caused the price of oil to increase from $30 to $130 a barrel, leading to inflation. Biden also allegedly took the wall down, resulting in millions crossing the border. Sources in the Israeli Defense League intelligence claim Hamas terror cells are now streaming into America because of Biden. Biden and Kamala are described as traitors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not the biggest scams we've ever seen is that Wall Street and these officials, they go into our pensions, public service pensions, and voila, the money is missing. So I flew for the marine corps here, and many of my my friends became pilots. Our pension was stolen. The pilots union's pensions were stolen by Wall Street. So this guy, Waltz, his military past, I mean, he was MIA for Iraq.
You gotta be kidding me. This guy is a gift that keeps giving the Republican party. And if we can't beat him, what's wrong with us? Anyway, the book is called who stole my pension by Edward Sedell here. And he's got the goods, the facts, and everything coming out this Saturday on the post.
So I don't think commas can be effective much longer, which is good news.
Speaker 1: Wow. Can't wait for that story. It sounds amazing. By the way, I'd like to put up this, this poll, actually from CNBC b 10 f s 2, if you don't mind. Better off financially.
If Trump wins 40%, I'm actually surprised it's not higher. People think it's but but obviously, he vanquishes, Kamala Harris. You're feeling pretty confident. Right?
Speaker 0: Well, it's just I, I went to military school also. Military school. And we were taught, watch what a person does, not what they say. So this guy, Biden, his first act was to cut the Keystone XL pipeline. And I went to school to drive oil oil tankers.
And the day that Biden came to office, the price of oil went from $30 a barrel to a 130. Inflation went through the roof, and then Biden blames the economy on it. Well, he's like, gotta cut the pipeline, and then Biden took the wall down. And today, millions of people are streaming across the border. And my friends are part of the Israeli Defense League intelligence.
And they said because of Biden, Hamas terror cells are now streaming into America. So that's what's going on now, and this guy Biden is not what he says. It's what did he do and what did Kamala do. I mean, they're traitors to our country.
Speaker 1: Robert Kiyosaki.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
CNN selectively edited President Trump and Elon Musk's conversation last night to claim they said that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not a big problem. https://t.co/QoJZfhlkcJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to highlight a notable exchange that exemplifies classic Donald Trump moments. In a discussion, there was a reference to cities that were bombed but have since recovered, suggesting that the situation isn't as frightening as people perceive. This comment, while reflecting on the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nearly 80 years ago, downplays the significant impact of those events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna play one exchange that was kind of classic. Well, there were a lot of exchanges that were exchanges that were classic Donald Trump, but this one really stuck out to us.
Speaker 1: And, you know, you were were bombed, but now they're they're, like, full cities again. So it's actually not something that, you know That's right. So it's it's not it's not as scary as people think, basically.
Speaker 0: So that was more Elon Musk than, Donald Trump talking about sort of suggesting that what happened almost 80 years ago, I think 80 years ago next year, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now it's okay, kind of trying to blow off the the impact of that.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
The Venezuelan government, under orders from the National Electoral Council (CNE), threatens imprisonment from 6 to 15 years for anyone protesting and rejecting the election results. 📍South west of Caracas. https://t.co/zZM9nqJuQu
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: House votes 220-196 to condemn Kamala Harris handling of the border. Six Democrats join with Republicans in support: — Peltola — Golden — MGP — Caraveo — Don Davis https://t.co/CAW4T7aRPx
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Flashback to Lincoln Project cofounder Rick Wilson in 2023: "They're still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump." https://t.co/FqMFty7SlO
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Steve Bannon: "I'm a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi, I'm a political prisoner of Merrick Garland, I'm a political prisoner of Joe Biden and the corrupt Biden administration." https://t.co/x8RJuHalR5
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi, Merrick Garland, and Joe Biden. They lie about everything, including the president's health, the 2020 election, and COVID. We must fight back to stop their corruption and lies. If they try to send me to prison, we will continue the fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fight. I'm a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi. I'm a political prisoner of Merrick Garland. I'm a political prisoner I'm a political prisoner of Joe Biden, the corrupt Biden establishment. And you saw yet you saw on Thursday all the lies that they told.
Right? All the lies they told. Any any group any group that would sit there and lie to you about the shape of the president of the United States with the national security element of that, lied about the 2020 election. They've lied about, COVID. They've lied about everything that they've done to the American people, and they're not gonna stop.
Until we stop them, they're not gonna stop. And the way you stop them is you do things that says, hey. If they're gonna send me to prison, it's not going to matter if we take this fight and take it up the next
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
CNN anchor Erin Burnett says that Biden "knows every one of these questions is coming" seemingly admitting that CNN gave Biden camp the debate questions beforehand. https://t.co/HXLSBVa5Rn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a candidate's poor performance in a debate despite extensive preparation. The White House claims the candidate had a cold, but the speaker believes the candidate's inability to do better speaks for itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He goes through 6 days of preparation at camp days. More than that. And they know the rules. More than a week. Okay.
They and so more than a week. They know the rules. He practices with the mics. He knows every 1 of these questions is coming, and yet he couldn't fill the time. Now that I I just wanna let's see what the White House is saying.
Sources close to the White House are saying he had a cold, wasn't feeling well. I mean, as you would expect, that came out early on in the debate. But what accounts for someone with so much experience doing so much preparation and this big outcome? Honestly, I think the question answers itself. He wasn't capable of doing any better than he did.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: Michael Cohen’s former attorney, Robert Costello, details the TRUTH about Michael Cohen and the LIES Cohen has promoted against President Trump. https://t.co/mz6WF0Ys9d
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Bob Costello, a former assistant US attorney, not representing Donald Trump. Michael Cohen accused me and Rudy Giuliani of obstructing justice by offering a pardon. I met with US attorneys to explain Cohen's lies and lack of evidence against Trump. Cohen sought an "escape route" from legal troubles but denied having damaging information on Trump. I provided evidence of Cohen's dishonesty to Trump's lawyers and the Manhattan DA's office. The DA declined to meet, but I spoke with assistant district attorneys before being scheduled to testify before a grand jury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Bob Costello. I've been an an attorney for 51 years, and I'm the former assistant US attorney in the Southern District of New York where I was deputy chief of the criminal division. I am not now nor have I ever been an attorney for Donald Trump, any of his family members, or any of his businesses. I've represented quite a number of high profile individuals, but never Donald Trump. During the period April 2018 to July 2018, I represented Michael Cohen.
Today, I can talk to you about what Michael Cohen told my law partner and me because Michael Cohen waived the attorney client privilege at the request of the US attorney's office for the Southern District of New York. The reason was Michael Cohen had plead guilty to 8 felony counts in the Southern District and was seeking to lessen his sentence. And he thought he could be clever by going into the US attorney's office and lying about cooperation. Michael Cohen went to the US attorney's office and accused Rudy Giuliani and myself of conspiring to obstruct justice by tampering with a witness, namely Michael Cohen. The story, which they were floating at the time and, his lawyers put out in the various newspapers, was that we had dangled a pardon under Michael Cohen's nose in order to keep him quiet so that he wouldn't testify against, Donald Trump.
When I received a call from the US attorney's office saying, Bob, we'd like to talk to you about your representation of Michael Cohen, I said to them, can I presume that you guys are sitting there with a copy of the waiver of the attorney client privilege? And they said, you presumed correctly. I told them to scan it over to me and once I received it, I'd be delighted to talk to them, and I did. I went down to 1 Saint Andrews Plaza with, a lawyer who had been the chief of the criminal division when I was deputy chief, Tom Fitzpatrick. And on the way into the office, he said to me, Bob, aren't you nervous?
I said, what for? I'm gonna tell the truth and I have documentary evidence that corroborates me 6 ways from Sunday. I said there's nothing to be nervous about. And in fact, I said, I'll bet you $10 I'll have these people laughing within 15 minutes. I won the bet.
I went up and I sat with 2 assistant US attorneys, Tom McKay and Nick Rose, as well as 2 FBI agents whose names, unfortunately, I don't remember. We had a grand old time. I explained our entire history with Michael Cohen through emails and text messages. I explained the many, many lies that Michael Cohen told us. Most especially, I told them that when we first met Michael Cohen in April of 2018, keeping in mind now that I read Michael Cohen's testimony from yesterday's trial in New York on the way down on the train, and virtually every statement he made about me was another lie, a lie that can be proven not just by me denying it, but by myself, Jeff Citron, or Rudy Giuliani, or emails, or text messages, virtually every statement that he made.
What he tries to do is he picks out cherry picks certain emails or text messages and tries to make them look like something else. The story he told yesterday was that Rudy Giuliani and I were somehow conspiring to try and keep him quiet, to try and keep him from flipping. That's the term we use in the trade for cooperating. That's ridiculous. The first day that we met with Michael Cohen at the Regency Hotel, at his request, and there's email correspondence that show this.
We went up there. I had never met Michael Cohen before. I didn't have any idea who he was or what sort of problem he was in. I saw this guy in a conference room at the Regency Hotel marching back and forth like a tiger in a cage. He was absolutely manic.
He looked like he hadn't slept in 4 or 5 days. And he kept on, he knew my partner, Jeff Citron, for 10 years. I didn't know the guy. He kept on pounding on the table throughout his speeches that day. Guys, I want you to know, I will do whatever the f I have to do.
I will never spend one day in jail. He had to say that at least 10 times, maybe 20. It was his constant litany as he walked back and forth. The so I said, Michael, sit down. We need to discuss what's going on here.
He told us about the raid, that his offices had been raid raided, his, home had been raided, and he said, I didn't do anything wrong, guys. I don't know what they're looking for. And I said, Michael, the people in the Southern District of New York are very smart people. They got a search warrant for a lawyer's office. You can't do that just by going to the US attorney.
You need to go to main justice and get approval from main justice. You need to show them that you have proof that a crime has been committed and that their evidence of that crime is gonna exist at the site to be, examined. I said, so, Michael, these people think that you did something wrong. What is it? I said, this is protected by attorney client privilege, and it was until he waived the attorney client privilege.
I swear to God, Bob, I didn't do anything wrong. In fact, I'm cooperating with the special counsel. I'm cooperating with Congress. Of course, he forgot to tell us that he lied to Congress, but that was part and parcel of the way Michael Cohen is. So I sat him down and I said, look, Michael, clearly here, you're not the target.
Nobody's ever heard of Michael Cohen, but you were the lawyer for president Trump and clearly that's their target. And let me explain to you how things work. When they get a search warrant, they're looking to gather evidence. They already have evidence against you for something, but you haven't told us what it is. And they are going to roll over you.
You're just a bump in the road. Their target is Donald Trump. So I want you to think carefully now. And by the way, up to this point, he had told us when he when he introduced himself to us that 2 nights before, he was on the roof of the hotel, of the Regency Hotel, seriously considering jumping off, committing suicide because he couldn't handle the pressure of the legal problems that he saw coming his way. And what he wanted to find out from us that day was his escape route.
That's what he called it. Guys, you have to tell me what my escape route is. What can I do to get out of this? And I did. My obligation as a lawyer at that point in time was to explain to him what his options were.
Clearly, one of his options was to cooperate. And I said to him, I said, Michael, the way this works is if you have truthful information about Donald Trump, that's clearly what they're looking for, I can have all your legal problems solved by the end of the week. His response? I swear to God, Bob, I don't have anything on Donald Trump. I said, Michael, I want you to think carefully about this.
I probably came back to this subject 10 or 20 times during the 2 hour period. Every time I brought it up, every time he answered, I swear to God, God, excuse me, Bob, I don't have anything on Donald Trump. I said, Michael, whatever you have has to be truthful. If you think you can go in there and tell these people lies, you're crazy. It's gonna backfire on you.
You can't do that. So do you have anything on Donald Trump? Probably the 5th or the 6th time I got around to doing that, he said, well, I know that money is missing from the Trump inaugural, ball. I said, is Donald Trump involved in that? No.
Does Donald Trump know anything about that? No. I said, Michael, that's useless. You're not going anywhere with that. I'm trying you asked me for your escape route.
I'm telling you, your escape route. All you have to do is be truthful if you have some real evidence on Donald Trump. His litany was the same all the time. I don't have anything on Donald Trump. This is exactly the opposite to what I saw him say on TV he was telling the grand jury in Manhattan and the district attorney's office.
He said, I went in there, I believe if my memory is correct, 20 times, including 2 appearances in the grand jury, 18 times preparation sessions with the DA's office. I was sitting at home listening to this and I said, that's nonsense. That's not what he told Jeff Citron and myself. And I decided at that point in time, I've gotta make it known to both the defense and the prosecution what the real story is, who this guy really is. So I provided all this material to, Donald Trump's lawyers and I provided it to the Manhattan DA's office.
And I asked for a meeting with, district attorney Bragg because I wanted to go in there, let him look me in the eye, and let me explain all of the stuff that we had on Michael Cohen that showed that he's an inveterate liar. The guy can't be trusted. Greg turned me down. But what he did say was, I'll I'll let you have a meeting with the assistant district attorneys. Now when the Mister Trump, we we need to just I'm sorry.
When the Trump people Shut up quickly. Heard about all this, they insisted, as was their right under the law, that the DA put me before the grand jury. Right. So that I was scheduled for a Monday. On the Friday before, I gave the DA's office the courtesy of a Zoom conference for about an hour and a half.
8 assistant district attorneys and me on the other end. I explained. They didn't ask really ask me any questions. They just said, what do you want to say? Nice warm greeting to somebody who's trying to show them the right path quietly and privately so that they could correct their error before they made it.
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump demands the removal of the gag order, asserting that it infringes upon his constitutional right to speak freely. He expresses frustration at being unable to address the public and emphasizes his desire to communicate with them.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
President Trump speaking outside the court house today: "The gag order has to come off. I should be allowed to speak. I have to be released from the gag order. They have taken away my constitutional right to speak and that includes speaking to you. I have a lot to say to you and I’m not allowed to say it."
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe it's unfair that the gag order is still in place. I have shown 32 legal experts who agree there's no case against me. I should be allowed to speak freely, but my rights have been taken away. I want to tell the truth, unlike others who can say whatever they want about me. The judge needs to lift this gag order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And people know and people know it's very unfair. The gang order has to come off. People are allowed to speak allowed to speak. Every time I come out to speak to you, I wanna be open because we did absolutely nothing wrong. I showed you yesterday 30 stories, 32 stories of experts, legal experts, and I don't have one the other way.
32 stories of legal experts say very strongly there's no case the judge because that's something that, he cannot do anything about. It's wrong. It's wrong. And the second thing is I have to be released to the gay, but they've taken away my constitutional rights to speak and then it's good speaking to you. I have a lot to say to you, and I'm not allowed to say it.
And I'm the only one. Everyone else can say whatever they want about me. They can say anything they want. They can and I wanna be able to speak to the threat of the press and everybody else about it. So why am I gay about telling the truth?
I'm only telling the truth. They're not telling the truth. The judge has to take off this gang run. It's very, very
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: NY judge issues a gag order restricting President Trump's ability to attack witnesses, prosecutors, their families or jurors. https://t.co/2zT7XmaGPV
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced a resolution to censure Ilhan Omar for her treasonous statements that she is serving as a foreign agent for a foreign country. "Ilhan Omar of Somali, I mean Minnesota.” https://t.co/pNFv0OpYqO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Ilhan Omar is being accused of making treasonous statements and violating her oath as a member of Congress. She allegedly promised to pressure the US government to act in favor of Somalia, stating that they will do what Somalians in the US want. It is claimed that she is acting as a foreign agent on behalf of Somalia. The resolution calls for her censure, removal from committees, and a public reading of the resolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Centering representative Ilhan Omar of Somalia, I mean Minnesota. Whereas, elected members of Congress take an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to the United States without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. Whereas Representative Ilhan Omar took an oath of allegiance to the United States upon becoming a citizen declaring, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen. Whereas, on January 27, 2024 Representative Omar gave remarks at an event in Minneapolis in which she made treasonous statements. Whereas, Representative Omar said she has spoken to many Somalians who asked her to intercede for the Somali government by pressuring the United States government into certain actions.
Whereas, Representative Omar assured the Somalian she spoke to, the US government will only do what Somalians in the US tell them to do. They will do what we want and nothing else. They must follow our orders and that is how we will safeguard the interest of Somalia. Whereas, Representative Omar continued, For as long as I am in US Congress Somalia will never be in danger. Its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others, sleep in comfort knowing I am here to protect the interest of Somalia from inside the US system.
Whereas George Washington warned in his farewell address of 17/96 to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism and further declared citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. Whereas, these statements by Representative Omar clearly violate the oath she took as an elected member of Congress to defend and protect the United States Constitution. Whereas Representative Omar has exhibited the treasonous tendencies George Washington warned about. And her actions must be condemned by all members of Congress who adhere to the oath they took upon assuming office.
And whereas by openly admitting her efforts to advance Somalia's interest using her position as a United States representative, Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of a foreign government. Now therefore be it, resolve that representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured. Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. Representative Ilhan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the speaker and representative Ilhan Omar be and is hereby removed from the Committee of the Budget and the Committee on Education and the Workforce.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: The Georgia State Senate, in a 30-19 vote, has sanctioned the establishment of a committee to probe allegations of an affair involving Fulton County DA Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade. https://t.co/Th0Xjll3eW
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
President Trump: “I will direct a completely overhaul DOJ to investigate every radical out of control prosecutor in America for their illegal racism and reverse enforcement of the law.” https://t.co/KcYKTH7nuI
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will reform the DOJ to investigate radical prosecutors who enforce the law in a biased and illegal manner. I will protect police officers from being targeted by the radical left for taking strong action against crime. We need to address the crime issue in our country and improve the poorly managed capital, which is currently plagued by rats, graffiti, and violence. Just this week, three people were shot, and even parks have become unsafe due to tents and homelessness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will direct a completely overhauled DOJ to investigate every radical, out of control prosecutor in America for their illegal, racist, and reverse enforcement of the law. I'm also going to indemnify all police officers and law enforcement officers throughout the United States to protect them from being destroyed by the radical left for taking strong action on crime. We're gonna stop crime in our country. And we will take over the horribly run capital of our nation. Horribly run.
We have a capital that we all love right now. It's a rat infested, graffiti infested shithole. It's horrible. Where people are being killed. This week, 3 people were shot.
People are being killed just for walking into a park, which is now littered with tents and homeless
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Reporter: "Why did you put your dad on speakerphone if he had nothing to do with your business!? You put him on speaker multiple times to talk to your business partners!" Hunter Biden: "You're very dangerous!!" https://t.co/CIjrU3RqqO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden was questioned about why he put his dad on speakerphone during business meetings if his dad had no involvement in his business. The other person asked if Biden's dad called him, to which Biden confirmed. The person then questioned why Biden needed to talk to his dad during business meetings if he had nothing to do with the business. The conversation took a confrontational turn, with the other person calling Biden dangerous and suggesting that his lawyer advised him to handle the situation privately.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden, why did you put your dad on speakerphone with your business partners if he had no involvement in your business?
Speaker 1: Do you have a dad? Just a Did he call you?
Speaker 0: Yes. Did he
Speaker 1: answer the phone?
Speaker 0: Yes. K. But why did you need to talk to him during business meetings If he had nothing to do with your business. Woah. Dangerous.
Speaker 1: You're very dangerous. So he says you're very dangerous. And of the reasons you might say that is because I'm sure that his lawyer said, we're gonna go out in the hallway. I'll handle the
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Bill Clinton is mentioned more than 50 times across redacted documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. https://t.co/fkD9szDaSG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former President Bill Clinton is set to be named in court documents related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. ABC reports that Clinton is mentioned over 50 times in the redacted documents, which will be released tomorrow. This is a developing story.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With a developing story. Former president Bill Clinton is reportedly about to be identified in several court documents related to convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. ABC reporting that Clinton is mentioned more than 50 times across the redacted documents, which are expected to be released tomorrow. To Minnesota, where
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Migrants overwhelm border in Arizona. Many of them are on terror watchlist caught at the border since OCT. https://t.co/VNX2OuflqH
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a live video showing the ongoing migrant crossing, different from the one last week. The footage captures a line of single working males. More information will be provided later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are not the photographs or video from last week's migrant, crossing. This is today. This is right now live happening, so it has not ended at all. And this line of Wow. Single working males Mhmm.
Is right here for all of us to see. We're gonna get more on this in a little bit. But just so that
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Moments ago the Israeli Air Force strikes the Al-Aklouk tower in the West of Gaza City.
reSee.it AI Summary
Iran secured the release of five Iranians in exchange for five Americans. However, the deal also involved an additional $6 billion. This was the agreement reached to ensure the freedom of the American prisoners.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Jacqui: "You just said Iran is not gonna do this for nothing. But, didn't they also get five Iranians [prisoners]" John Kirby: "They will get five Iranians." Jacqui: "Why did we need to add $6 billion dollars on top of that?" John Kirby: "This is the deal we were able to strike to secure the release of five Americans."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran will receive 5 Iranians in exchange for the release of 5 Americans. The $6 billion addition was necessary to secure this deal. It would be ideal if we could simply ask for the Americans to be sent back, but that's not possible with Iran. Bringing Americans home requires tough decisions, compromise, and negotiations with people we may not want to negotiate with. However, it is important for Americans in trouble overseas and their families to know that this administration will do whatever it takes to bring them home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John you just said that Iran is not going to do this for nothing. But didn't they also get 5 Iranians?
Speaker 1: They will get 5 Iranians as well. Yes, Jackie.
Speaker 0: Then why did we need to add $6,000,000,000 on top of that?
Speaker 1: This is the deal that we were able to strike to secure the release of 5 Americans. It would be great, wonderful. If we could just pick up the phone and call the Moab and say, hey, we want our Americans back, send them back on the next plane. But you and I both know that's not going to happen particularly with Iran. And getting Americans home requires decisions, sometimes really tough decisions.
It requires compromise. It requires negotiations. It requires negotiations with people you really would rather not be sitting across the table from, but you got to do it because Americans overseas in trouble wrongfully detained need to know and their Families need to know that this president and this administration will do what it takes to bring them home.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Rep. James Comer on Biden's bribe scheme: "Joe Biden's not been honest about this. He won't explain what his family did to get the millions and millions of dollars."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential crimes committed by the Bidens in relation to their dealings with China. They mention that the Bidens could be charged as unregistered foreign agents, potentially involved in bribery, wire fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. The speaker finds it insulting that these actions have not been reported. They believe that Joe Biden's involvement borders on treason and that he has not been honest about his family's financial dealings. The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the truth and reveal Joe Biden's role in receiving the money. The speaker concludes that Joe's claim of having no knowledge is a blatant lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're getting into the territory of of of of traitorous behavior. If you're taking money for the benefit of an adversarial nation, first, my question is what crime specifically is that? What is the charge for that? There better be something for that because that is a despicable and highly unethical act?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, they're an unregistered foreign agent because they're clearly serving as essentially a lobbyist for China. And that's a that's a huge violation. That was one of the things the IRS whistleblower said that the Bidens could have been, Prosecuted on, especially the president's son, was being an unregistered foreign agent. Then you you you have potential bribery. You have potential, wire fraud?
Because none of this was being reported. You have money laundering because they China didn't send the money directly to the Bidens. They laundered it through a bunch of shell companies. That's Called racketeering. The charges go on and on and on.
That's why it's so insulting.
Speaker 0: But if you but if you're
Speaker 1: didn't do anything to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 0: If if you're the president and you're making policy decisions to benefit an adversary of the United States, there has to be a higher prime, then bribery then potentially bribery.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it it borders on treason, in my opinion. Joe Biden's not been honest about this. He won't explain what his family did to get the 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars. We're having to rely on interviews we've conducted with former associates. Now we're in the deposition phase of this of this investigation.
So people are gonna come in and have an opportunity under oath to tell the world exactly What the Bidens were doing to receive all this money and what role Joe played in it. And that's very important. Yeah. Because Joe's always said he had no knowledge of it. And I think the American people are fixing to get an eye opening experience as to what Joe was doing to help receive this money.
Speaker 0: It's so much beyond just had no part in it. It's so much beyond that. That's just a blatant lie. We can all see that.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Joe Biden standing alongside Indian PM Modi remains clueless, after realizing they're playing the Indian national anthem.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
Sen. Ted Cruz blasts Deputy AG Lisa Monaco: “You have been a loyal deputy standing alongside that partisan corruption of Department of Justice. You have been willing to devote massive resources to targeting individuals that are perceived to be political opponents of the White House."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ms. Monica, the number 2 person in the Department of Justice, is questioned about the partisan nature of the department and its failure to enforce certain criminal statutes. Specifically, the speaker focuses on 18 USC 1507, which prohibits influencing judges through picketing or parading near their residences. The speaker accuses the DOJ of not prosecuting violations of this statute, despite numerous protests outside Supreme Court justices' homes. Ms. Monica denies this claim, stating that the attorney general has directed the US Marshals Service to enforce all federal laws and prioritize the safety of the justices. The speaker argues that a written presentation contradicts this, emphasizing that the goal is to avoid arrests and prosecutions. Ms. Monica disagrees with this interpretation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Ms. Monica, welcome.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: You have a very important job. You're the number 2 person in the Department of Justice. Every US attorney reports to you. The US Marshals report to you. You're responsible for day to day operations of the Department of Justice.
And in particular, the criminal justice aspects of the Department of Justice. Is all of that correct?
Speaker 1: That's correct.
Speaker 0: It is unfortunate, Ms. Monica, that as you look back over the last two and a half years, This Department of Justice, I believe, has been the most partisan Department of Justice we've ever seen. And that is directly contrary to the mission of DOJ. DOJ is meant to be nonpartisan. It is meant to enforce the law regardless of party.
I had hopes that Merrick Garland would actually do that when he was confirmed. Those hopes have been shattered. You have been a loyal deputy standing alongside that partisan corruption of Department of Justice. You have been willing to devote massive resources to targeting Individuals that are perceived to be political opponents of the White House. And you have been willing to devote zero resources To protecting individuals who are perceived to be political opponents of the White House.
I want to ask you about a statute you've been asked about already, 18 USC 1507. You're familiar with this statute?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: It's a criminal statute that says whoever with the intent of influencing any judge pickets or parades In or near a building or residences occupied or used by such judge shall be fined or imprisoned under this title or imprisoned Not more than 1 year or both. Now the entire country has seen hundreds of protesters outside the homes of supreme court justices night after night after night. You turn on your TV and you see violations of this criminal statute over and over and over again. How many prosecutions has DOJ brought Under 18 U. S.
C. Section 1507 under your leadership?
Speaker 1: There have been no prosecutions under 15 7, we're pursuing an attempted murder case against an individual 0 is the answer. Justice Kavanaugh.
Speaker 0: I'm quite aware, and you're Possible for that, allowing these protests night after night after night. The violent threat of homicide of the individual who traveled across the country, attempting to murder a Supreme Court justice. That was fueled by DOJ refusing to enforce this statute. Now, it's not an accident that DOJ refused to enforce this statute. The US Marshals put up gave a presentation.
The General Counsel's Office of the US Marshals, if you look at one of the pages From that presentation, the general counsel's office stated the goals of the residential and personal protection mission, Keep SCOTUS justices and their family free from physical harm. Do not interfere with lawful first amendment protected activity. Avoid, unless Absolutely necessary. Criminal enforcement actions involving the protester protesters, particularly on public space and making arrests and Initiating prosecutions is not the goal of the president's of the marshal's presence at SCOTUS Residences. Are you familiar with this presentation?
Speaker 1: I am. I'm familiar with the fact that the U. S. Marshals Service director has been explicit, has been clear that the attorney general has repeatedly Directed him to enforce all Federal laws, including 1507, and that his number one priority, and that of His many deputies assigned to a 20 fourseven secondurity presence is to protect the life, the safety, the property of the justices.
Speaker 0: Did you or anyone from the DAGS office meet with the U. S. Marshals Service and discuss Section 1507?
Speaker 1: I regularly meet with, the director of the Marshals Service. The attorney
Speaker 0: general And have you discussed 15/07?
Speaker 1: The I've discussed the, the Attorney general has been quite clear and I have been quite clear with the director of the Marshals Service.
Speaker 0: Are you familiar with this presentation?
Speaker 1: I've seen those slides if they're the ones that, senator Britt presented to the attorney general. I wanna be quite clear, senator, about, the direction given to the Marshals Service through the director of the Marshals Service, he has been clear that the attorney general directed him repeatedly To enforce all federal laws, to make sure that this is not a government that today
Speaker 0: is demonstrably false because this is written The instruction, making arrests and initiating prosecution is not the goal. That's not an instruction to enforce the law. That is exactly the opposite. City is a 180 degrees. It is instructing them.
It is not the goal to arrest anybody despite the fact that the criminal statute said they shall be imprisoned. You made a political decision. Merrick Garland made a political decision that because you agree with the protesters, you don't like The decision the supreme court justices made, the marshals were instructed don't arrest anyone and don't enforce federal law. Isn't that correct?
Speaker 1: It's not correct. Because the attorney general and I and the martial service director are so concerned about potential threats to the justices, the attorney general directed in an unprecedented Step 247 What does
Speaker 0: this says in writing?
Speaker 1: 247 What
Speaker 0: does this say in writing?
Speaker 1: I don't have the right glasses on for that. But, Senator, the attorney general was very clear with the director of the Marshals Service, and the Marshals Service director has said the same thing.
Speaker 0: The word not is even underlined.
Speaker 1: The number one priority Given to the Marshals Service for their unprecedented protection detail for the Supreme Court Justices is to protect their life, Their safety
Speaker 0: To ignore 15/07.
Speaker 1: To protect their life, their
Speaker 0: safety To ignore federal criminal law.
Speaker 1: Respectfully disagree with that characterization.
Speaker 0: That's What the written instruction says not is underlined. Do not make arrests. Do not initiate prosecutions. Up is not down.
Speaker 1: The director of the marshal service has been very clear. The attorney general directed him to enforce all federal laws, But that his number one priority is to ensure the safety
Speaker 0: Miss Monica, what you're saying is objectively false.
@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report
🚨Breaking: Sensitive security information with details of Joe Biden's travel reportedly going missing and then later showing up tossed in the streets of Ireland.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden's motorcade was in Ireland when a security breach occurred. Sensitive information about his travels went missing but was later found discarded on the street.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Breaking at this hour, all new at 2. President Biden on the ground in Ireland, his motorcade making his way through the streets there after a stunning security breach during the president's trip to Ireland. Yeah. Sensitive security information with details of president Biden's Travels reportedly going missing, then later showing up tossed in the street.