TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RealTrumperMel

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 1:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation on Anna Von Kreitz and the use of trusts in cults. @RealTrumperMel warns about Anna's involvement in a trust that encourages people to give up US citizenship. @KristinNap95954 questions if it's the same person. @Truthliesnlibe1 denies knowledge of Anna as a judge and discusses trusts. @RealTrumperMel argues against joining an assembly with Anna as trustee, emphasizing individual rights. @Truthliesnlibe1 denies association with any trust and requests evidence for conspiracy theories. Conversation ends.

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

I’ve learned recently that Anna Von Kreitz, (also known as Anna Von Kreitzinger and Anna Marie Kreitzinger) arguably leader to one of the various versions of “state National” groups that is convincing people to stop being a US citizen, is the trustee for a trust that you are being invited to lock your assets into while throwing off your citizenship. On an entirely different train of thought unrelated to this person, I’ve done some research on cults. Some cult leaders have used trusts as a means to manipulate followers into giving up control of their assets. This manipulation often involves convincing followers that creating a trust is a way to protect their assets or ensure their financial security, when in reality, it serves the interests of the cult leader or the organization. Here's how this manipulation can occur: 1. Promise of Asset Protection: Cult leaders may persuade followers that creating a trust is a wise financial decision to shield their assets from potential legal or financial threats. They may emphasize the trust's supposed ability to protect assets from creditors, lawsuits, or government actions. 2. Control Over Trust: In many cases, the cult leader or a trusted representative of the cult is named as the trustee of the trust. This gives the leader control over the trust's assets and decision-making, effectively allowing them to manage and use the assets as they see fit. 3. Isolation from Independent Advice: Cults often isolate followers from external financial advisors or legal counsel who could provide objective guidance. This prevents individuals from seeking independent advice that might question the cult leader's recommendations. 4. Exploitative Fees: Cult leaders may charge followers significant fees for setting up and managing the trust, further depleting their financial resources. 5. Conditional Benefits: Cult leaders might condition access to certain benefits, privileges, or spiritual advancement on followers' participation in the trust arrangement. This creates a sense of obligation and dependence. 6. Secrecy and Opaqueness: Cults may maintain secrecy about the trust's operations and financial dealings, making it difficult for followers to understand how their assets are being managed. It's essential for individuals to exercise caution and seek independent legal and financial advice before entering into any financial arrangement, especially one involving trusts. @realJohnMK @Truthliesnlibe1 @hopes4usall @17thSCOG @DaveCaresForYou

@KristinNap95954 - Kristin Napolillo

@RealTrumperMel I've heard of someone name Anna Von Reitz, or Anna Von Reitzinger. Or Rietzinger. I'm seeing different spellings. Same person?

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

@KristinNap95954 Same person

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

@KristinNap95954 Yes drop the K. My bad. But also there are different spellings and different names. She is a self-proclaimed judge according to sources.

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙By:💯Chance

I have no first-hand knowledge of Anna claiming to be a Judge. I posted about several individuals teaching this hard to find and prove information im my pinned 5 part thread, and it may actually clarify some things you may be missing. The American States Assembly and also a book by: Brent Winters the excellence of the common law (not affiliated with Anna that i know of) have the most relevant citations out of them all, IMHO.

@RealDaveCares4u - DavidJose

@Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @KristinNap95954 I saw the claims of being a judge in Alaska

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙By:💯Chance

@RealDaveCares4u @RealTrumperMel @KristinNap95954 Have you ever heard her talk about selling people trusts to protect their assets?

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

Your words. She’s the fiduciary of the trust in the assembly you want people to sign up with. But here’s the problem I see. I have my own contract with my government. I don’t need to join an assembly where there is a person who is the trustee. I am my own trustee. I get to speak to my government and hold them to the trust and contract I have with them as a citizen of this country. I don’t need to stop being a citizen and lose all my power to hold them accountable. We don’t make this woman who created an assembly the trustee of anything as it pertains to me and my freedoms. What is she the trustee of? Why is she given power that is ours already individually? When you ask people to join your assembly that she is the trustee of, why? We run TOWARD our state constitutions. We the people have individual rights. What is Anna’s role here? We don’t abandon government. We force government to uphold the constitution. But first we must learn it. No one needs to follow Anna into a trust that she is the trustee of. Tell me how I’m wrong here.

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙By:💯Chance

Your trying to lead the conversation to fit your narrative again Mel.🥴 I require you to Cease and Desist or i will take lawful action against you in your individual capacity.😳 I told you that i have no knowledge of this trust you are trying to associate me with and i firmly rebuke your slanderous🐔💩 assumptions once again. The only trusts I've tried to find information about is the public charitable trust (its blood money and i want nothing to do with it unless the fraud is disclosed) and i haven't found much credible information about it. I just want to live in peace and i mean no loss or harm to anyone. Please direct any other inquiries to the individual you want to make a claim against. Can you please provide a link to prove all these alleged conspiracy theories and accusations you have made in past posts on the @XApp. If not I'm leaving this honeypot ⭕⭕⭕ 🎪 offensive Conversation.🤗

Saved - August 14, 2023 at 10:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation revolves around a dispute regarding the nature of the United States as a corporation. @17thSCOG argues that the US is not a corporation, citing legal definitions and historical context. @hopes4usall challenges this view, referring to the 1871 organic act and the State of Delaware. @RealTrumperMel claims to have uncovered evidence supporting the idea that the US is a corporation. The conversation also touches on personal interactions and requests for respectful communication.

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙by:💯Chance

I feel like im being stalked by you and your crew Mel.@elonmusk definitely doesn't want us to be fighting on his platform. Please cease and disist from tagging me in your posts and any other Slander and or libel your spreading about myself @realJohnMK and any others in our group. Thank you 🤗

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙by:💯Chance

@RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @17thSCOG @elonmusk @realJohnMK This video is damming to your argument by the way,so this should hopefully settle any argument we have between us. Have a great day Mel. 🤗 https://t.co/y9v9HcvUYr

@17thSCOG - 17th Special Civilians Operations Group

It’s damning to my argument? Why because she said it? So she’s automatically right, is that what you’re saying? Because she’s wrong too. I’m sorry to say. We are not a corporation. You guys have misunderstood that in a big way. And I want to show it, so I’m writing another article again, that’s going to describe all this. There’s a difference between a corporation, a government corporation, and a municipal corporation. By law they’re all different. Now the basis for the root of the claim of US is a corporation is 1871 the organic act, where governments were switched or there was another constitution, or whatever it is that you is claimed. It’s simple, there were a couple of local governments, Washington and Georgetown, and In 1871 they were combined under one local government which took on the form of a municipal corporation. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION From 26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions: When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof— (30) Municipal corporation The term “municipal corporation” refers to a city, town, or other public body created by or pursuant to State law, or an instrumentality thereof." CORPORATION 26 U.S. Code § 7701 (a) (3) - Definitions: "The term 'corporation' includes associations, joint-stock companies, and insurance companies." 47 U.S. Code § 153 (15) - Definitions: "The term 'corporation' includes any corporation, joint-stock company, or association." 46 U.S. Code § 50501 - Entities deemed citizens of the United States: Defines the criteria for a corporation to be deemed a citizen of the United States, including incorporation under U.S. or State laws, ownership, and control by U.S. citizens. GOVERNMENT CORPORATION 5 U.S. Code § 103 - Government corporation: Defines "Government corporation" as a corporation owned or controlled by the Government of the United States. 31 U.S. Code § 9101 - Definitions: Defines "Government corporation" as a mixed-ownership Government corporation and a wholly owned Government corporation, listing specific examples. No, when you look at the wording in the organic act of district of Columbia ,1871, it says, DEFINITION IN THE ORGANIC ACT OF 1871 The municipal corporation that was established in Washington, D.C., in 1871 is a unique entity due to the special status of the District of Columbia. Unlike other cities in the United States, Washington, D.C., is not part of any state, and its governance structure is defined by federal law. The Organic Act of 1871 effectively created a government for the entire federal territory, merging the City of Washington, Georgetown, and Washington County into a single municipal government known as the District of Columbia. This act established a temporary government in the form of a municipal corporation governed by a governor and council appointed by the President of the United States. Let’s get some context to this, The District of Columbia was established under the authority and direction of Acts of Congress approved July 16, 1790, and March 3, 1791, which were passed to give effect to a clause in the eighth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States, giving Congress the power: "To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district ( not exceeding ten miles square ) as may, by cession of particular States and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased, by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenal, dockyards, and other needful buildings." This established our nations capital. Continued….

@17thSCOG - 17th Special Civilians Operations Group

ACCEPTANCE BY CONGRESS. The acceptance by Congress, of the cession to it of the territory embraced in the District, is expressed in the act approved July 16, 1790, as follows: "That a district of territory, not exceeding ten miles square, to be located as hereafter directed on the river Potomac, "etc., "be and the same is hereby accepted for the permanent seat of Government of the United States." THE FIRST CITY OFFICIALS. The first officials of the City of Washington were the President of the United States, the three commissioners appointed by the President under act of July 16, 1790, and, to a limited extent, the officers of the Levy Court. On July 1, 1802, the office of the three commissioners was abolished. About the same time, the duties which commonly appear to municipal government were entrusted to the inhabitants of the City of Washington by an act incorporating them, “as a city, as hereinafter mentioned.” The remaining duties of the Commissioners were successively vested in officers created by law for that purpose, and styled respectively, " Superintendent; " " Commissioner to superintend public buildings, " and finally in the Chief of Engineers of the United States Army. THE FIRST CHARTER OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON. The first municipal incorporation of the inhabitants of the city of Washington was affected by an act of Congress approved May 3, 1802. This charter provided for a mayor appointable annually by the President of the United States, and a city council to be elected by the people. The charter was modified by subsequent acts of Congress. The first mayor was appointed in June 1802, and was reap pointed annually and served until the second Monday in June 1812. An act of Congress of May 4, 1812, devolved the duty of selecting a mayor upon the city council, which was elected by the qualified voters of the city. That method remained in force until the first Monday of June 1820, or about eight years. From that date the mayor was elected by the people for terms of two years until May 31, 1871, a period of nearly fifty - one years, when the charter expired pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress approved February 21, 1871, entitled "An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia.” The United States of America is not a corporation, no matter how it’s spelled. All caps or not, look at the law. It’s there plain as day. Here is the organic Act of 1871, you can see for yourself…. The unfortunate thing is this whole US corporation debacle is distracting from the actual banking and financial system. That gravely needs overhauling and regulatory reform on many many levels. The amount of time people spend on US corporation instead of our monetary system, and banking system and our currency is baffling. And I would recommend not just listening to somebody because they’re on the news on TV. Just a recommendation you obviously can do whatever you want. We are a free country after all.

@hopes4usall - Sheela

@17thSCOG @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK “Acceptance” is not to be confused with “ratification”. Have you forgotten section 105 of Title 4 of the U.S.C. all together? Many unlawful acts ensued under which erroneous constitution you may be relying upon here.

@17thSCOG - 17th Special Civilians Operations Group

@hopes4usall @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK And how are you using US code? You don’t even believe in it. So you guys confuse me. What law are you using nowadays. Which constitution are you referring? That’s really the question here isn’t it?

@hopes4usall - Sheela

Firstly, you personally do not know me, and it's disingenuous for you to claim to know what I believe or don't believe in. Secondly, the 1789 and 1790 constitutions from which the basis of the 1871 organic act you relied upon is exactly what I alluded to as being erroneous. Here's the link to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-1787. The link is directly from the U.S. Code website, which I presume you have already visited throughout your research. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/frontmatter/organiclaws/constitution&edition=prelim…

@17thSCOG - 17th Special Civilians Operations Group

@hopes4usall @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK It is. As I have said, the only one. So if you have proof that another constitution was used for the 1871 organic act I’d love to see it. Along with any other proof of this claim.

@hopes4usall - Sheela

@17thSCOG @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK https://t.co/QiJzaLeUNs

@17thSCOG - 17th Special Civilians Operations Group

@hopes4usall @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK Yeah there’s many of these. do you know who owns this company? And by who’s authority does it grant its incorporation? You actually believe this is the United States government? Seriously?

@hopes4usall - Sheela

@17thSCOG @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK You tell me, you read the 1871 organic act. What is the State of Delaware? Thus, what the Delaware Secretary of State?

@hopes4usall - Sheela

@17thSCOG @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK @threadreaderapp unroll

@threadreaderapp - Thread Reader App

@hopes4usall @17thSCOG @Truthliesnlibe1 @RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @elonmusk @realJohnMK @hopes4usall Sorry we only unroll consecutive tweets from the same author. 🤖

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

Just dropping a tiny little patriot announcement here. We have just cracked the entire US is a corporation sitcheation Yes, that is slang for situation. I'm channeling Boss Hog or Rosco Pico Train, one of those boys. Also, I am proclaiming that as of tonight I am OFFICIALLY an anon. @17thSCOG stay tuned @LordOfThePepes, @PugnaciousMedia and all you beautiful froggy memers, what accessories does a lady Pepe need when she makes her debute on the green carpet? I’m excited y’all! That feeling when you are about to save your frens from a lot of worry and fear and bring much needed joy and sunshine we all need! I hear a collective sigh coming! God is so faithful!!

@BillyAngelz - BillyAngel

@RealTrumperMel @17thSCOG You can't be an anon if you are declaring it under your name, Melody Jennings. You do know what anon is short for right?

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

@BillyAngelz @17thSCOG I do. Let me have this haha. I did real research and discovered important things. 💚🐸

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙by:💯Chance

@RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @17thSCOG I'm only a Unilateral Ombudsman, but I look forward to seeing what you have found.

@RealTrumperMel - Melody Jennings

@Truthliesnlibe1 @BillyAngelz @17thSCOG I appreciate that and I would ask that you please not start spaces to talk smack about me without me in the room. Patriot courtesy. I caught the recording. Looking forward to better days.🙏🇺🇸

@Truthliesnlibe1 - Unilateral Ombudsman🎙by:💯Chance

@RealTrumperMel @BillyAngelz @17thSCOG I have nothing but love for you Mel. Nobody has started any spaces to talk about you and just because i prefer to take the high road and not respond to the tweets that your tagging me in which are useless because they lack any useful information and sound unhinged and cringe.😬

View Full Interactive Feed