TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Real_RobN
reSee.it AI Summary
I present a decade-long claim that DNI Gabbard’s declassified documents vindicate Trump and accuse Obama’s administration of conspiring to overthrow the government in 2016, alleging politicized intelligence and a Russia hoax. I name numerous officials and say Wray’s report confirms no collusion, while Democrats are blamed for the smear and destruction of lives.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A decade in the making! This is: United States Press Secretary Karoline Claire Leavitt: “Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by the Director of National Intelligence, @DNIGabbard, the truth has finally come to light — and it vindicates President Trump and his family.” Barack Hussein Obama, along with his entire administration, conspired to overthrow the United States government in 2016. @PressSec: “While pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, Barack Hussein Obama, in private, went to great and nefarious lengths to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, President Trump. The new evidence released by the Director of National Intelligence confirms that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence, which was later used as justification for baseless smears against President Trump — an effort to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetrated on the American people from the very beginning. The worst part is that Obama knew the truth, as did all the other officials involved, including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and many others.” ——— Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Lisa Monaco, Adam Schiff, Peter did Lisa, Lisa did Peter, Bruce Whore, Nellie Whore, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissmann, Valerie Jarrett, Ben Rhodes, John Carlin, Mary McCord, James Baker, Jonathan Moffa, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Samantha Power, John Kerry, Denis McDonough, Jim Rybicki, Bill Priestap, Christopher Steele, Richard Dearlove, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper, Joseph Mifsud, Sergei Millian, Sidney Blumenthal, Cody Shearer, Terry McAuliffe, Jonathan Winer, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Peter Kadzik, Rachel Brand, Matthew Axelrod, Mary Jacoby, Preet Bharara, Josh Campbell, Jennifer Palmieri, Sir Andrew Wood, Robert Hannigan, Alexandra Chalupa, Michael Sussmann, Dmitri Alperovitch, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, and Fusion GPS — including Glenn Simpson — as well as Perkins Coie, including Marc Elias, falsified intelligence as part of a seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election. And Christopher Wray!! @PressSec “The Director of National Intelligence Gabbard’s report further confirms what we already knew: there was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax was a blatant lie, all ginned up by Democrat political operatives that were signed off on by Barack Obama and leaked to the news media to launch a years-long witch hunt against President Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including his own son Donald Trump Jr., were disgustingly smeared as Russian assets, and some even had their lives destroyed because of this vicious lie.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released new evidence alleging that former President Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The speaker asserts that while Obama publicly appeared to support a peaceful transfer of power, privately he took steps to sow discord and sabotage Trump, including manufacturing and politicizing intelligence that was used to justify baseless smears against the new president. The claim is that Trump had no involvement with Russia and that the Russia collusion narrative was a massive fraud, known to Obama and others involved, including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and others.
The speaker reiterates that DNI Gabbard’s report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, attributing any wrongdoing to Barack Obama and the “weaponized” intelligence agencies of the time. The Russia hoax is characterized as a blatant lie manufactured by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some personally harmed by the false narrative. The speaker notes that much of this occurred during Trump’s first two years in office, consuming vast resources, time, and political capital to debunk the allegations at the highest levels of government.
According to the speaker, nearly a decade later, declassification of documents by DNI Gabbard, alongside contributions from CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, supports a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This report reportedly found the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin sought to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was allegedly preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. The narrative claims that, at the time, Obama’s unusual stance led the intel community to publish implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president.
The speaker asserts this constitutes one of the greatest political scandals in American history, noting that legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post were rewarded with Pulitzer Prizes for propagating political disinformation. The claim is made that those awards should be stripped from journalists who disseminated out-of-context and false intelligence to push a political narrative in service of the Democrats and associated intelligence actors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Other matter over the past few days, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled shocking new evidence that former president Barack Obama and top aids in the Obama administration conspired to subvert president Trump's February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. While publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power in private, former president Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to try to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, president Trump. The new evidence released by the director of national intelligence who is here with me today confirms that the Obama administration manufactured, politicized intelligence, which was later used as a the justification for baseless smears against president Trump in an effort to try to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that president Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the very beginning. And the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth, and so did all of the other corrupt officials involved in this scam, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and many others.
Director of National Intelligence Gavirage report further confirms what we already knew. There was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax was a blatant lie, all ginned up by Democrat political operatives that were signed off on by then president Obama and leaked to the news media to launch a years long witch hunt against president Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including his own son, Donald Trump junior, were disgustingly smeared as Russian assets, and some even had their lives destroyed because of this vicious lie. The president's first two years in office had this fake distraction hanging over it and endless resources, time, and political capital were spent having to debunk these lies from the highest levels of our government.
Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by director Gabbard, the truth has finally come to light. And this truth vindicates president Trump, his family, and his many allies and associates who were smeared with defamatory lies. President Trump was right from the beginning about all of this, and we are grateful that justice can be served. Now, we have even more damning evidence implicating those who tried to sabotage a duly elected president and did grave material harm to our republic. Thanks to additional important work done by CIA director Ratcliffe, committee chairman Rick Crawford over the past few months, a newly declassified 2020 report prepared by the house permanent select committee on intelligence, which DNI director Gabbard has declassified, found that the intel community did not have any direct information that Russian president Vladimir Putin want to help wanted to help elect president Trump in 2016.
And in fact, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. But at the unusual of Barack Obama at the time, the intel community published implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise. Why? To sabotage the incoming president. This is truly one of the greatest political scandals in American history.
And reporters at Legacy outlets, some of which are sitting in this room today, like the New York Times and the Washington Post, were ridiculously awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their perpetuation of this hoax. It's well past time for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who receive them. It is not journalism to propagate political disinformation in service of the Democrat party and those in the intelligence community who hand over out of context and fake intelligence to push a false political narrative.
reSee.it AI Summary
I find this the most shocking testimony from Nov 3, 2020: a Michigan poll watcher swore these are absentee ballots; they cannot be in sequence, ballot 2232 cannot have 2233 next to it, many numbers differ, often without dates. 2020 was no election. It was an overthrow.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This 👇👇 right here is the single most shocking testimony from the November 3, 2020 election. A Michigan poll watcher testified under oath: “These are absentee ballots—mail-in ballots. They cannot be in sequence. Ballot 2232 cannot have 2233 next to it because they are mailed in. They come in with many different numbers, often without any dates.” 📝 2020 was no election. It was an overthrow.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes observing absentee/mail-in ballots and recording details from the ballots. They wrote down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person named on each ballot. The ballots appeared to be in sequence, which, according to the speaker, should not happen with mail-in ballots, since mail-in ballots come in at different times and numbers. The speaker recalls that when they noticed the numbers were almost next to each other—one in the middle, then another—they became suspicious.
The speaker asked the supervisor about this, noting there was not even a date on the envelopes. The envelopes were marked November 2020, but there was no second number or other identifying date visible. When the speaker inquired about the date on a specific envelope, the response was hostile: the supervisors became angry and told them they were not letting them do their job and that the speaker was disturbing them.
To avoid being kicked out, the speaker and the others in the room chose not to challenge the process further, since they did not want to be removed and there were only a few people present. The speaker also observed that the sequence of ballot numbers all originated from the same area—Guarded Street in Downtown Detroit. The ballots’ signatures looked alike, and none of the envelopes had dates stamped on them. The envelopes appeared to be missing a second or third date, or any date, and none of the ballots were appearing in the voting system.
Additionally, the speaker notes that these ballots were being entered manually, and they asserted that none of these details would be present in the poll book or the system. The overall implication is that there was irregularity in the handling of these absentee ballots, with sequential numbers, indistinct dates, signatures resembling each other, and manual entry outside the expected process, raising concerns about whether the ballots were being processed consistent with standard procedures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Writing down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person of the ballot that that had the name on the ballot. They were all in sequence. These are absentee ballots, mail in mail in ballots. They cannot be in sequence. Two two three two cannot have two two three three next to it because if they're mailed in, they come in all different numbers.
And when when I started noticing that these numbers are almost next to each other, like, one or the other was in the middle, but then they were almost next to each other, My my antennas went up. That's exactly when I thought something is not right here. Then I asked the supervisor. There was not even a date on those envelopes. It said November 2020.
There was no second number there. Then I said, what is the date on this one? Then they got really mad at me. They said, you're not letting us do our job. You're disturbing us.
And at that point because we really don't wanna be kicked out, you know, so we were just kinda not challenging anything because we wanna still stay in the room because we barely had anybody. Not only that, the sequence ballot numbers were all from the same area, like the Guarded Street in the Downtown Detroit. Guarded street, sequential ballots, signatures were all alike. They had no date stamped. It said like, it was empty after zero.
There was no third or second or first or nothing. And they were none of them were coming up in the system. They were all being entered manually. They even knew that none of these details would even be in the poll book or in the system.
reSee.it AI Summary
I met with NSA, ODNI, lawyers. I mapped Dominion, and I asked how they could steal an election. I built a model, went to Washington, and it happened exactly as I said it would. I reviewed RFPs, manuals, and what happened on November 3. I told them Democrats would win the Georgia runoff, flip it, and the vote would come back up. In a SCIF, Pompeo’s counsel watched—he knew. The CIA toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: Joe Oltmann: “I met with NSA guys. I met with ODNI people. I met with lawyers. I met with guys who said, ‘How did you get this information?’ Mapped out how Dominion Rigging Systems overthrows governments, including right here in the U.S. “I said, okay, let me dig into Dominion. Can they actually steal an election? Then I was like, wait, we have a Georgia runoff — a race for a Senate seat. And then I built the model, and I was like, they’re going to steal it. Here’s how they’re going to do it. I mathematically mapped out how they were going to steal the election, and I went to Washington. And then it happened exactly the way I said it would happen.” “I met with NSA guys. I met with ODNI people. I met with lawyers. I met with guys who said, ‘How did you get this information?’ I said, ‘Well, I went through and mapped all the RFPs, RFQs, manuals — everything I had for Dominion. And I worked backward to determine what the vulnerabilities would be. Then I looked statistically at what happened on November 3rd. And I said, okay, in this runoff election, the Democrats are going to take both seats. And here’s how they’re going to do it: they’re going to flip it, and the vote is going to come down. It’s going to come back up. I literally told them exactly what was going to happen. I went to meet with Pompeo’s (CIA Director) counsel. Pompeo was supposed to be there, and I was in a SCIF at the State Department when everything happened at the Capitol briefing. And he looked up at me, and he’s sweating in a room that is very cool. And I’m like, ‘Oh, crap — he knows.’ And that’s how I knew it was an inside job.” 📝 In other words, the CIA toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a belief that Dominion could steal an election and that he built a model to prove it. He says, “they're gonna steal it,” and that he “mathematically mapped out how they were gonna steal the election.” He claims he went to Washington, met with NSA and ODNI personnel, and with lawyers, and that he explained how he obtained the information by “going through and did a map of all the RFPs, RFQs, manuals, things that I had for Dominion, and I built backwards what the vulnerabilities would be.” He asserts that he analyzed what happened on November 3 and concluded that in the Georgia runoff for the Senate, “the Democrats are gonna take both seats.” He specifies the method: “They're gonna flip it, the vote's gonna come down. It's gonna come back up.”
He states that John Eastman was present, and that his entire speech at Ellipsis with President Trump on January 6 was information that Eastman took from him after “hours of grilling me over a two day period of time.” He adds that he then went to meet with Pompeo's counsel; Pompeo was supposed to be there, and he was in a skiff at the State Department when the Capitol events occurred during a briefing with counsel. He says the counsel looked up at him and was sweating in a room that is very cool, and concludes, “And I'm like, oh, crap. He knows.” He claims that’s how he knew it was an inside job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Into dominion. Can they actually steal an election, or is it just a hyperbolic guy? And then I was like, wait. We have a Georgia runoff race for the senate seat. And then I built this model, and I was like, they're gonna steal it.
Here's how they're gonna do it. I mathematically mapped out how they were gonna steal the election, and and I went to Washington. And then it happened exactly the way I said it happened. And I met with NSA guys. I met with ODNI people.
I met with lawyers. I met with guys that said, how did you get this information? I said, well, I went through and did a map of all the RFPs, RFQs, manuals, things that I had for Dominion, and I built backwards what the vulnerabilities would be. And then I looked at statistically what happened on November 3. And then I said, okay, in this runoff election, the Democrats are gonna take both seats.
And here's how they're gonna do it. They're gonna flip it, the vote's gonna come down. It's gonna come back up. I I literally told them exactly what's gonna happen. John Eastman was there.
His entire speech at Ellipsis with president Trump on January 6 was information that he took from me from hours of grilling me over a two day period of time. Wow. So and I went to meet with Pompeo's counsel. Pompeo was supposed to be there, and I was in a skiff at the state department when everything happened at the at the capital briefing counsel. And he looked up at me, and he's and he's sweating in a room that is very cool.
And I'm like, oh, crap. He knows. And that's how I knew it was an inside job.
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that after nearly ten years and the DNI’s declassification, the truth vindicates President Trump and his family. I claim Barack Obama and his administration conspired to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, fabricating and politicizing intelligence to smear Trump for not colluding with Russia. I name numerous officials and say Christopher Wray is involved in this seditious conspiracy.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A decade in the making! This is: United States Press Secretary Karoline Claire Leavitt: “Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by the Director of National Intelligence, @DNIGabbard, the truth has finally come to light — and it vindicates President Trump and his family.” Barack Hussein Obama, along with his entire administration, conspired to overthrow the United States government in 2016. @PressSec: “While pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, Barack Hussein Obama, in private, went to great and nefarious lengths to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, President Trump. The new evidence released by the Director of National Intelligence confirms that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence, which was later used as justification for baseless smears against President Trump — an effort to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetrated on the American people from the very beginning. The worst part is that Obama knew the truth, as did all the other officials involved, including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and many others.” ——— Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Lisa Monaco, Adam Schiff, Peter did Lisa, Lisa did Peter, Bruce Whore, Nellie Whore, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissmann, Valerie Jarrett, Ben Rhodes, John Carlin, Mary McCord, James Baker, Jonathan Moffa, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Samantha Power, John Kerry, Denis McDonough, Jim Rybicki, Bill Priestap, Christopher Steele, Richard Dearlove, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper, Joseph Mifsud, Sergei Millian, Sidney Blumenthal, Cody Shearer, Terry McAuliffe, Jonathan Winer, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Peter Kadzik, Rachel Brand, Matthew Axelrod, Mary Jacoby, Preet Bharara, Josh Campbell, Jennifer Palmieri, Sir Andrew Wood, Robert Hannigan, Alexandra Chalupa, Michael Sussmann, Dmitri Alperovitch, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, and Fusion GPS — including Glenn Simpson — as well as Perkins Coie, including Marc Elias, falsified intelligence as part of a seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election. And Christopher Wray!!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tulsi Gabbard released new evidence asserting that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. She claims that while publicly maintaining a peaceful transfer of power, Obama privately worked to sow discord and sabotage his successor, and that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence used to justify baseless smears against Trump to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. She contends that Trump never had anything to do with Russia and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud known to be false by Obama and others, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and more. Gabbard says the report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather by Obama and weaponized intelligence agencies, with the Russia hoax being a lie driven by Democrat political operatives approved by Obama and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. She asserts that allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the lie. According to her, the first two years of Trump’s presidency were consumed by debunking these lies at the highest government levels. She notes that nearly ten years later, declassification of documents shows the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and his allies. She claims this new evidence strengthens the case that those who sabotaged a duly elected president did grave harm to the republic. Gabbard credits CIA Director Ratcliffe, Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, and the declassification of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she says shows the intel community did not have any direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but, at Obama’s unusual direction, the intel community published implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. She describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and contends that Legacy outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for perpetuating the hoax, arguing it’s time those awards be stripped for journalism that propagates political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Other matter over the past few days, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled shocking new evidence that former president Barack Obama and top aids in the Obama administration conspired to subvert president Trump's February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. While publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power in private, former president Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to try to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, president Trump. The new evidence released by the director of national intelligence who is here with me today confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence, which was later used as a the justification for baseless smears against president Trump in an effort to try to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that president Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the very beginning. And the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth.
And so did all of the other corrupt officials involved in this scam, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and many others. Director of National Intelligence Gabbard's report further confirms what we already knew. There was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax was a blatant lie, all ginned up by Democrat political operatives that were signed off on by then president Obama and leaked to the news media to launch a years long witch hunt against president Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including his own son, Donald Trump junior, were disgustingly smeared as Russian assets, and some even had their lives destroyed because of this vicious lie.
The president's first two years in office had this fake distraction hanging over it and endless resources, time, and political capital were spent having to debunk these lies from the highest levels of our government. Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by director, the truth has finally come to light. And this truth vindicates president Trump, his family, and his many allies and associates who were smeared with defamatory lies. President Trump was right from the beginning about all of this, and we are grateful that justice can be served. Now we have even more damning evidence implicating those who tried to sabotage a duly elected president and did grave material harm to our republic.
Thanks to additional important work done by CIA director Ratcliffe, committee chairman Rick Crawford over the past few months, a newly declassified 2020 report prepared by the house permanent select committee on intelligence, which DNI director Gabbard has declassified, found that the intel community did not have any direct information that Russian president Vladimir Putin want to help wanted to help elect president Trump in 2016. And in fact, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. But at the unusual direction of Barack Obama at the time, the intel community published implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise. Why? To sabotage the incoming president.
This is truly one of the greatest political scandals in American history. And reporters at Legacy outlets, some of which are sitting in this room today, like the New York Times and the Washington Post, were ridiculously awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their perpetuation of this hoax. It's well past time for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who receive them. It is not journalism to propagate political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and those in the intelligence community who hand over out of context and fake intelligence to push a false political narrative.
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, during the counting delay, implying ballots that never existed. I note 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots were sent and ask why 4.1 million were mailed for 2.6 million voters, suggesting backfilling. I urge passage of the SAVE Act; Election Day should be election day.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up.
After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes.
He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation.
To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies.
Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Era Copa, even though they had 2,595,272 registered voters, and they said 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and every and all the counting, there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. Now think about that. They called the election at 2,089,512 votes. But at the closing of the books in the actual canvas, when you look at these numbers, not counting pieces of paper. Remember, I'm counting something different.
I'm counting the actual codes on the paper. There are only 1,923,693 numbers that show up. That's called the pre. After they did their post adjudication, which was after the election, here's what you need to see. Number one, by the time they closed out voting, there were a 165,819 ballots missing.
They could not explain where they were. That's 7.94% of the votes in 2020. They could not tell you where they were. However, mysteriously, after all of those days and a month later, a month later in in Arizona, they came up with the number of 2,086,959. Now please notice that's still 200 two two thousand five hundred and fifty three ballots missing.
And to this day, they'll tell you that Biden won by 10,500 votes. Here's what you need to understand. In that process of time, the time hack where they needed extra time to count, which is now something they're doing in every election. They didn't do it before. It's new to 2020, and now they do it every time.
They picked up, I e, manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system after the fact that you can't prove came into the system before the fact? Now remember, I showed you other ways to audit this and catch it. It's done.
Well, here's how Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa. They only have 2,595,272 registered voters. They printed for Maricopa, 4,027,968 ballots. These numbers come out of the machines. They are what they are when they roll off the line.
These are their numbers. It's nobody looks deeper enough. So why would Maricopa print 1,432,696 overprints? Why would they do that? Because if you're going to do this, if you're gonna make up missing numbers, you've gotta have those backwards ballots to do it because what happens is you're feeling you're filling in when it comes to the time hack.
The time hack is what you need. You have to have two things. You have to be able to suspend ballots, meaning don't let them hit the bottom line. In 2020 with Sharpengate, in 2022 in Arizona, it was okay. We can't scan it.
Drop it in box number three. You have to suspend them from hitting. And then once you know the numbers, you can put in whatever you want. That's why they don't exist in the pres. They don't exist in the post.
Folks, when your audit's right, all of your numbers cross reference each other and crisscross. Regardless of how you find it, you should be able to find it in every single manifestation.
reSee.it AI Summary
After a decade, I claim declassified DNI documents vindicate President Trump and his family. I say Obama’s administration conspired to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, while pretending a peaceful transfer of power, and smeared Trump with politicized intelligence over Russia. I name Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, and many others, plus Hillary Clinton, Podesta, DNC figures, Fusion GPS, and Christopher Wray.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A decade in the making! This is: United States Press Secretary Karoline Claire Leavitt: “Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by the Director of National Intelligence, @DNIGabbard, the truth has finally come to light — and it vindicates President Trump and his family.” Barack Hussein Obama, along with his entire administration, conspired to overthrow the United States government in 2016. @PressSec: “While pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, Barack Hussein Obama, in private, went to great and nefarious lengths to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, President Trump. The new evidence released by the Director of National Intelligence confirms that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence, which was later used as justification for baseless smears against President Trump — an effort to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetrated on the American people from the very beginning. The worst part is that Obama knew the truth, as did all the other officials involved, including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and many others.” ——— Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Lisa Monaco, Adam Schiff, Peter did Lisa, Lisa did Peter, Bruce Whore, Nellie Whore, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissmann, Valerie Jarrett, Ben Rhodes, John Carlin, Mary McCord, James Baker, Jonathan Moffa, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Samantha Power, John Kerry, Denis McDonough, Jim Rybicki, Bill Priestap, Christopher Steele, Richard Dearlove, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper, Joseph Mifsud, Sergei Millian, Sidney Blumenthal, Cody Shearer, Terry McAuliffe, Jonathan Winer, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Peter Kadzik, Rachel Brand, Matthew Axelrod, Mary Jacoby, Preet Bharara, Josh Campbell, Jennifer Palmieri, Sir Andrew Wood, Robert Hannigan, Alexandra Chalupa, Michael Sussmann, Dmitri Alperovitch, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, and Fusion GPS — including Glenn Simpson — as well as Perkins Coie, including Marc Elias, falsified intelligence as part of a seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election. And Christopher Wray!!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unveiled new evidence alleging that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The private actions contrasted with publicly presented peaceful transfer of power, as Obama allegedly sought to sow discord and sabotage his successor. The released evidence purportedly confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence that was later used to justify baseless smears against President Trump in an effort to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. The speaker asserts that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated from the start, with Obama and others allegedly knowing the truth.
The speaker names several officials as part of the alleged scheme: former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and other officials. The report is said to corroborate that there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather wrongdoing by Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax is described as a blatant lie, devised by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the allegations.
The speaker notes that the first two years of Trump’s presidency were overshadowed by this fake distraction, with extensive resources, time, and political capital spent debunking the lies from the highest levels of government. Nearly ten years later, declassification of documents by the director is said to reveal the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and allies who were smeared. The speaker claims there is now damning evidence implicating those who attempted to sabotage a duly elected president and harmed the republic.
Thanks to work by CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, declassified by DNI Gabbard, allegedly finds that the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; rather, Russia was preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but was allegedly steered by Obama’s unusual direction to publish implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise to sabotage the incoming president.
The speaker describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and criticizes reporters from legacy outlets, including the New York Times and Washington Post, who allegedly continued to propagate the hoax, saying they were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for disinformation. The call is made for those awards to be stripped from journalists who produced disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Other matter over the past few days, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled shocking new evidence that former president Barack Obama and top aids in the Obama administration conspired to subvert president Trump's February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. While publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power in private, former president Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to try to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, president Trump. The new evidence released by the director of national intelligence who is here with me today confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence, which was later used as a the justification for baseless smears against president Trump in an effort to try to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that president Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the very beginning. And the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth.
And so did all of the other corrupt officials involved in this scam, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and many others. Director of National Intelligence Gabbard's report further confirms what we already knew. There was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax was a blatant lie, all ginned up by Democrat political operatives that were signed off on by then president Obama and leaked to the news media to launch a years long witch hunt against president Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including his own son, Donald Trump junior, were disgustingly smeared as Russian assets, and some even had their lives destroyed because of this vicious lie.
The president's first two years in office had this fake distraction hanging over it and endless resources, time, and political capital were spent having to debunk these lies from the highest levels of our government. Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by director, the truth has finally come to light. And this truth vindicates president Trump, his family, and his many allies and associates who were smeared with defamatory lies. President Trump was right from the beginning about all of this, and we are grateful that justice can be served. Now we have even more damning evidence implicating those who tried to sabotage a duly elected president and did grave material harm to our republic.
Thanks to additional important work done by CIA director Ratcliffe, committee chairman Rick Crawford over the past few months, a newly declassified 2020 report prepared by the house permanent select committee on intelligence, which DNI director Gabbard has declassified, found that the intel community did not have any direct information that Russian president Vladimir Putin want to help wanted to help elect president Trump in 2016. And in fact, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. But at the unusual direction of Barack Obama at the time, the intel community published implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise. Why? To sabotage the incoming president.
This is truly one of the greatest political scandals in American history. And reporters at Legacy outlets, some of which are sitting in this room today, like the New York Times and the Washington Post, were ridiculously awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their perpetuation of this hoax. It's well past time for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who receive them. It is not journalism to propagate political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and those in the intelligence community who hand over out of context and fake intelligence to push a false political narrative.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the January 6 proceedings were disrupted by the FBI, part of a criminal conspiracy led by McConnell, Pelosi, Schumer, and Bowser, toppling the U.S. government through cyber warfare in battleground states with Hammer and Scorecard, allegedly sold by Comey to the CCP.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is: Lt. General Thomas McInerney The official proceedings of January 6, which were disrupted by the FBI, were in fact part of a criminal conspiracy enabled by Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Muriel Bowser. And: They toppled the U.S. government through cyber warfare in the battleground states—using Hammer and Scorecard, which James Comey sold to the Chinese Communist Party.
Video Transcript AI Summary
They claim our society has been taken over, and they point to one person in the White House who supposedly stands in the way. They warn that every American will have to stand up, saying we read about it in history like Normandy, but now we are in it and must spread it. They insist we cannot surrender, and reference that the president wouldn’t surrender. They state it was an attack on the capital carried out by Antifa, but was enabled by McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and the mayor, saying they knew it was coming and that security was lacking as Antifa acted, with the media later picking it up. They accuse Fox of disgraceful coverage, claim Rupert Murdoch is driving that with his sons, and say they merged with the rest of the mainstream media. They describe the situation as serious and expanding, claiming we do not have four years and that time is against us, drawing a comparison to Hong Kong to emphasize urgency.
They discuss information released about cyber warfare used in battleground states. They claim to have learned that James Comey, the former FBI director, sold the HAMR and SCORECARD, a top-secret program, to the Chinese. They describe HAMR as a top-secret program similar to an iPhone that gains access to voting networks, with an application like on an iPhone that can be installed to modulate voting results so they win by smaller margins. They say they received a call on Tuesday night at 11:30 about the ISI from Pakistan being in the voting machines in Georgia, and that they informed someone about it. They assert that the two candidates Loeffler and Purdue were ahead, but an hour later they were behind.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have taken control of our society, and we have one person, we just came from there in the White House, standing in the way. And it's gonna mean, and you don't fully realize it, but every one of us here, every American out there is going to have to stand up. We read about it in history. We read about Normandy and all of that, but now we are in it. And so we must spread it.
We cannot cannot surrender. And the president said he wouldn't. You all know that it was that attack on the capital was done by Antifa, but it was enabled by McConnell, by Schumer, by Pelosi, and the mayor. They knew that was coming. You've all been up there.
There were hardly any security police there, and and they moved in, and Antifa did their thing, and then the media picked it up. I worked for Fox for almost seventeen years. It's disgraceful what they're doing. And then and, unfortunately, Rupert is driving that with his sons, and they have now merged with the rest of the mainstream media. This is serious.
This is expanding. We cannot let it happen. We don't have four years. As Hong Kong has seen, we do not have time. Time is against us.
And Anne and I were just talking to someone about the information that's being released that shows clearly in those battleground states the cyber warfare that was used. We also found out I found out yesterday that Comey, the former FBI director, sold the HAMR and scorecard, this top secret program, to the Chinese. So you now have this top secret program that is like your iPhone. It gets in. It's called Hammer.
It gets into the voting network, and then it has an application like on your iPhone. You have all those apps. It puts it on, and it modulates the voting so they win, not by a large number. I got a call Tuesday night at 11:30 that the ISI from Pakistan was now in the voting machines in Georgia. I called someone, let them know.
The two candidates, Loeffler and Purdue, were ahead. I watched. One hour later, they were behind.
reSee.it AI Summary
I quote Lt. General Thomas McInerney: the January 6 proceedings, disrupted by the FBI, were part of a criminal conspiracy enabled by McConnell, Pelosi, Schumer, and Bowser. They toppled the U.S. government through Hammer and Scorecard cyber warfare, sold to the CCP by Comey.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is: Lt. General Thomas McInerney The official proceedings of January 6, which were disrupted by the FBI, were in fact part of a criminal conspiracy enabled by Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Muriel Bowser. And: They toppled the U.S. government through cyber warfare in the battleground states—using Hammer and Scorecard, which James Comey sold to the Chinese Communist Party.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker warns that “they have taken control of our society” and urges everyone to stand up, from the White House to every American, insisting that surrender is not an option and that time is running out, with a comparison to the urgency seen in Hong Kong. The speaker claims the attack on the capital was carried out by Antifa but was enabled by political figures—McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and the mayor—who allegedly knew it was coming and were lax on security, allowing Antifa to act before the media picked it up.
The speaker criticizes media coverage as disgraceful, referencing an affiliation with Fox for almost seventeen years and asserting that Rupert Murdoch and his sons are driving a merge with the rest of the mainstream media. The assertion is made that this consolidation represents a serious, expanding threat.
Attention turns to alleged cyber and information warfare, with the speaker mentioning new information about battleground states where cyber warfare was used. The speaker claims that former FBI director James Comey sold HAMR and Scorecard, a top-secret program, to the Chinese. According to the speaker, HAMR is a program that simulates an iPhone-like app inside the voting network, enabling it to be installed and to modulate voting to favor one candidate over another, rather than by a large margin.
The speaker recounts a specific telephone claim: on a Tuesday night at 11:30, they were told that the ISI of Pakistan was in the voting machines in Georgia. They say they informed someone about it. The claim is made that, in Georgia, the two candidates Loeffler and Purdue were ahead, but one hour later, they were behind, suggesting a dramatic and rapid shift attributed to external manipulation.
Throughout, the speaker emphasizes urgency, global and domestic conspiracies, and the need to act immediately to counter perceived control over society, media, and the electoral process. The narrative ties together political figures, media influence, alleged clandestine cyber tools, and foreign involvement in U.S. voting systems, presenting a cohesive but controversial account of systemic manipulation and imminent danger.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have taken control of our society, and we have one person, we just came from there in the White House, standing in the way. And it's gonna mean, and you don't fully realize it, but every one of us here, every American out there is going to have to stand up. We read about it in history. We read about Normandy and all of that, but now we are in it. And so we must spread it.
We cannot cannot surrender. And the president said he wouldn't. You all know that it was that attack on the capital was done by Antifa, but it was enabled by McConnell, by Schumer, by Pelosi, and the mayor. They knew that was coming. You've all been up there.
There were hardly any security police there, and and they moved in, and Antifa did their thing, and then the media picked it up. I worked for Fox for almost seventeen years. It's disgraceful what they're doing. And then and, unfortunately, Rupert is driving that with his sons, and they have now merged with the rest of the mainstream media. This is serious.
This is expanding. We cannot let it happen. We don't have four years. As Hong Kong has seen, we do not have time. Time is against us.
And Anne and I were just talking to someone about the information that's being released that shows clearly in those battleground states the cyber warfare that was used. We also found out I found out yesterday that Comey, the former FBI director, sold the HAMR and scorecard, this top secret program, to the Chinese. So you now have this top secret program that is like your iPhone. It gets in. It's called Hammer.
It gets into the voting network, and then it has an application like on your iPhone. You have all those apps. It puts it on, and it modulates the voting so they win, not by a large number. I got a call Tuesday night at 11:30 that the ISI from Pakistan was now in the voting machines in Georgia. I called someone, let them know.
The two candidates, Loeffler and Purdue, were ahead. I watched. One hour later, they were behind.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Christopher Wray covered up Obama’s overthrow in 2016, oversaw the 2020 overturn and January 6, and for 2024 signed off on Operation Arctic Frost, fueling the false elector case against Trump. I allege he possessed the 2020 election server, Hunter and other laptops, Epstein files, and 302s; spied on Americans 278,000 times; raided Mar-a-Lago; planted evidence; and buried ongoing investigations in burn bags, now being revealed.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Wait one minute—did you think James Comey was corrupt? Christopher Wray covered up Obama’s attempted overthrow in 2016, oversaw the overthrow in 2020, and covered it with January 6. Now it has been confirmed that for the 2024 election he signed off on Operation ‘Arctic Frost’ formed the basis of Special Prostitute Jack Smith’s false elector case, under which President Donald Trump was later charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States for his campaign’s efforts to assemble alternate slates of electors — which that the United States government was overthrown during the 2020 election. • Christopher Wray had the 2020 election server. •Christopher Wray had Huma Abedin’s laptop. •Christopher Wray had Seth Rich’s laptop. •Christopher Wray had Hunter Biden’s laptop. •Christopher Wray had Jeffrey Epstein’s files. •Christopher Wray had Democrat intel staffer’s 302 report—Adam Schiff along with his girlfriend Eric ‘Bang Fang’ Swalwell authorized leaking classified intelligence in order to trigger a special counsel—exactly what James Comey did. •Christopher Wray even had intelligence showing that the CCP interfered in the 2020 election with fake mail-in ballots and driver’s licenses. He buried it and then ordered agents to delete the intelligence. ⸻ In fact, Christopher Wray was investigating Turning Point USA—that’s right, Charlie Kirk. •Christopher Wray allowed the FBI to recruit informants in Catholic parishes. •Christopher Wray allowed SWAT teams to terrorize pro-lifers. •Christopher Wray allowed the FBI, in cooperation with Big Tech, to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights. •Christopher Wray raided Mar-a-Lago, planted evidence, and lied to the court about it. •Christopher Wray raided Trump officials and charged January 6 trespassers with seditious conspiracy. • Christopher Wray spied on American Citizens 278,000 times, yet the Republican Senators are crying like cowards because he spied on them. • Christopher Wray even investigated parents at school board meetings—and every time he testified before Congress, he claimed he couldn’t answer questions due to “ongoing investigations.” And those “ongoing investigations”? They’ve now been discovered—buried in burn bags in secret rooms within the intelligence community—and @DNIGabbard is digging them out one by one, revealing them to the American people as we speak.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asserts that there is a two-tier justice system weaponized to persecute people based on political beliefs, and that Director Wray has personally helped weaponize the FBI against conservatives. He references the Twitter files, Missouri v. Biden disclosures, the Durham investigation and report, and the exposure and collapse of the Russian collusion hoax. He asks Director Wray what he is prepared to do to reform federal law enforcement to earn back the trust of the American people, noting that he asked Mister Durham about this, and Durham said he did not think things can go too much further given that law enforcement, particularly the FBI or Department of Justice, runs a two-tiered system of justice.
Speaker 0 responds by disagreeing with the other speaker’s characterization, saying the description of his bias against conservatives seems insane given his personal background. He explains that the approach to protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution starts with emphasizing to his staff to do the right thing in the right way, which means following the facts wherever they lead, no matter who likes it. He outlines several actions: enhanced procedures, safeguards, approvals, double checks and triple checks, record-keeping requirements, accountability policies, and funding for new functions like an Office of Internal Audit that didn’t exist before. He notes the installation of an entirely new leadership team from his predecessor and asserts that where he can take action, he will to hold people accountable by removing them from the chain of command. The exchange ends with an invitation to speak further, though the remark is truncated: “Gentlemen, ladies, time to speak to the….”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lab leak.
Speaker 1: Okay. Mister Wray from the Twitter files, Missouri versus Biden disclosures, the Durham investigation and report, and exposure and collapse of the Russian collusion hoax, the American people fully understand that there is a two tier justice system that has been weaponized to persecute people based on their political beliefs, and that you have personally been weapon that you have personally worked to weaponize the FBI against conservatives. I asked mister Durham about this to which he answered, I don't think that things can go too much further with the view that law enforcement, particularly the FBI or Department of Justice runs a two tiered system of justice. The nation can't stand under those circumstances. Director Ray, what are you prepared to do to reform federal law enforcement in a manner which which earns back the trust of the American people?
Speaker 0: Well, first off, I would disagree with your characterization of the FBI and certainly your description of my own approach. The idea that I'm biased against conservatives seems somewhat insane to me, given my own personal background. As to how we are approaching our work of protecting the American people and upholding the constitution, it starts with me having emphasized to all of our folks over and over and over again in everything we do that we need to do the right thing in the right way, and that means following the facts wherever they lead no matter who likes it. It starts then goes on from there, to all kinds of enhanced procedures, safeguards, approvals, double checks, triple checks, record keeping requirement, accountability policies, funding of new functions like an office of internal audit that didn't exist before, the installation of an entirely new leadership team from my predecessor, And and where I can take action, where we can take action to hold people accountable by removing people from the chain of command Gentlemen, ladies, time to speak to the We will
reSee.it AI Summary
I read this: @MikeBenzCyber claims Carnegie Endowment, a 501(c)(3), was run by CIA Director Bill Burns and pays CIA operative Eric Ciaramella, planted to overthrow the U.S. government in 2019, plus NED director Rachel Kleinfeld; they publish an open call to “Help Democrats win”—where’s the IRS?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: @MikeBenzCyber : The Carnegie Endowment is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. It was run by CIA Director Bill Burns and pays salaries to CIA hitman Eric Ciaramella who was planted to overthrow the U.S. government in 2019, and NED director Rachel Kleinfeld. But it says it's a 501(c)(3). they publish an open call to "Help Democrats win" ? Where the fuck is the IRS?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker talks about a range of theories that could be undertaken, suggesting that some approaches might be carried out in good faith even if the underlying aim is partisan. They express a desire to appear nonpartisan, framing it as a plausible or acceptable stance, while asserting that the real objective is to help Democrats win elections. The speaker goes further, stating that the ultimate aim is for the Republican Party to become pro-Democratic again, implying that partisan goals should be achieved even as the outward posture remains nonpartisan.
They acknowledge that there is money involved from a Republican congress, which informs why there is a need to maintain the appearance of nonpartisanship. This point is tied to the financial dimension of political activity, suggesting that funding sources influence how partisan or nonpartisan a campaign or effort presents itself.
The speaker notes that in 2022 there was a Republican House of Representatives, establishing the political context for the discussion and the timing of the strategies being described. This reference to the 2022 House situates the dynamics of party influence and the practical environment in which these ideas are supposed to operate.
A central claim is that the goal is to help Democrats win until they run Nikki Haley or the ghost of John McCain again, indicating specific targets or figures as benchmarks for when the strategy would shift or when the alignment might change. The mention of Nikki Haley and “the ghost of John McCain” is used to illustrate particular political moments or personas that would influence how the strategy is executed or reframed.
The speaker then asserts that it is not enough to simply help Democrats win. Beyond that, there is a need to create a Coke and Pepsi dynamic so that the Republican party ends up back in the box—an analogy implying that the party should be contained, moderated, or redirected in a way that makes it more compatible with the nonpartisan or pro-Democratic objective. The use of this metaphor emphasizes a desire to reset or constrain the Republican Party’s behavior or identity to align with the overarching goal of shaping outcomes in favor of Democratic interests.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And help Democrats win. A number of theories may be executed as good faith. Yeah. Sure. We'd like to appear nonpartisan.
What we really wanna do is help Democrats win until the Republican Party becomes pro Democratic again. So until we still need to pretend that we're nonpartisan. We shouldn't be looking to, you know, explicitly look like we're a partisan thing because we get money from a Republican congress. And in 2022, you have a Republican House of Representatives, but we should really be trying to help Democrats win until they run Nikki Haley or the ghost of John McCain again. But it's not enough to just help Democrats win.
We need to create a Coke and Pepsi so that the Republican party gets back in the box
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that while Obama was busy with an ICA report tying Trump to Russia, Ukraine allegedly interfered in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton, and the DNC, including Hillary herself, colluded with Ukraine to topple the U.S. government on her behalf. The General Prosecutor says enough evidence to open a criminal investigation into Ukrainians trying to influence the U.S. election for Hillary. Court documents and a tape corroborate, and the Ukrainian embassy confirms the DNC asked Ukraine to dig up dirt on Manafort.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: While Barack Obama was busy manufacturing an ICA report tying Trump to Russia, not only did Ukraine—a foreign power—interfere in the 2016 presidential election on behalf of Hillary Clinton, but the Democratic National Committee (DNC), including Hillary Clinton herself (Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC), colluded and conspired with a foreign power, Ukraine, to help topple the United States government on her behalf. CONFIRMED: By a court ruling, audio tape, and Ukraine’s top prosecutor (Attorney General), King Solomon Reporting: The General Prosecutor of Ukraine stated: “There’s enough evidence for me to open a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton.” Court documents: CONFIRM • Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort’s financial records to try to sway the U.S. election. • A parliamentary member testified: “I have a tape of these law-enforcement officials saying, ‘They did it’—they attempted to overthrow the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016. Ukraine’s Embassy in Washington confirmed on the record: That in 2016, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected—which was Hillary Clinton herself (Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC)—asked the Ukrainian Embassy to interfere in the election by: — Digging up dirt on Paul Manafort and having Ukraine’s president create a kerfuffle in Washington about Manafort and Trump during his visit. 📝 In other words, the whole Manafort scheme was also orchestrated by Hillary Clinton via Ukraine; Manafort was even sent to prison for it. Truly evil.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence.
Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine.
Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation.
Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct?
Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power
Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier.
Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence.
Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine.
Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation.
Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct?
Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power
Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier.
Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that six swing states halted counting on election night, November 3, 2020. In Wisconsin, at 3:42 a.m. on November 4, 2020, Claire Woodall-Vogg allegedly xeroxed 64,000 ballots in Milwaukee City Hall at 3 a.m.—all in favor of an incapacitated vegetable.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: After six swing states simultaneously stopped counting on election night, November 3, 2020. The State of Wisconsin, November 4, 2020, at 3:42 a.m. This was around the same time that Wisconsin Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall-Vogg xeroxed 64,000 ballots in the back conference room of Milwaukee City Hall—Room 501—at 3 a.m. for the November 3, 2020 election, all in favor of an incapacitated vegetable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 37 and 03:42AM local time, the tallied votes stood at 168,386 in total. Of these, 143,379 votes, or 85%, were for Biden, and 25,163 votes, or 14.9%, were for Trump. Five minutes earlier, Trump had been in the lead, but this later influx reversed the situation in Wisconsin and gave Biden the lead. In the currently contested Wisconsin results, Biden leads Trump by 20,608 votes.
Yet at 03:42AM on November 4, Biden received a peculiar influx of 143,379 votes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thirty seven and 03:42AM local time. A 168,386 votes were tallied, of which a 143,379 or 85% were for Biden and 25,163 or 14.9% were for Trump. Before that five minutes, Trump had always been in the lead. This abnormality reversed the situation in Wisconsin and gave Biden the lead. In the currently contested Wisconsin results, Biden leads Trump by only 20,608 votes.
Yet 03:42AM on November 4, Biden received a peculiar influx of a 143,379 votes.
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize the post as claiming that declassified CIA documents and George Soros emails prove Hillary Clinton conspired with the intelligence community and Soros to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, with Obama allegedly ordering an Olympic-level report to smear Trump and tie him to Russia. It says the effort continued through impeachments, investigations, and culminated in a 2020 overthrow.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: More damning declassified documents and emails released by @CIADirector reveal Hillary Clinton conspired with the intelligence community and George Soros to overthrow the United States government in 2016: Documents declassified by CIA Director John Ratcliffe—at the Olympic level. Emails from George Soros’ Open Society Terrorist Foundation: “It will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump,” approved by HRC—Hillary Rodham Clinton—“to tie Trump to Russia as a means of distracting people from her own missing emails, especially if the affair reaches an Olympic level. For now, it serves to provide a post-convention bounce. Later, the FBI will be right there to add more oil to the fire.” In other words—yes indeed—Barack Hussein Obama was right there, taking it to the Olympic level by ordering a newly manufactured ICA report—as part of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and a long-term effort to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States @realDonaldTrump in 2017. Followed by two impeachments, multiple investigations, arrests, indictments, raids, two assassination attempts, and ultimately, the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. Any questions?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses a set of emails and intelligence claims regarding the 2016 U.S. election and the narratives surrounding Russia, Hillary Clinton, and the Trump campaign. It states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. One email quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, “it will be a long term affair” and to “demonize Putin and Trump,” and adds that, “later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.”
Other emails are said to reveal that Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents are presented as providing clear evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was behind the Russia hoax, and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp.
Despite these claims, the transcript asserts that the Obama-era intelligence community proceeded with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. He quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, quote, it will be a long term affair and to demonize Putin and Trump, and adds that, quote, later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire, unquote. Other emails reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, and that was a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. These documents provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to acknowledging that the info they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite this, the Obama intel community forged ahead with their 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
reSee.it AI Summary
I maintain Devin Nunes was vindicated: twenty CIA/FBI whistleblowers say Obama and Brennan created the Russia hoax, falsified intel to overthrow the government and Trump, and locked the report in a CIA vault. I recall his 2017 White House briefing, then being forced aside; Schiff allegedly deceived for six years until removal in 2023 with Swalwell. Now I demand the Presidential Medal of Freedom for Nunes.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: Devin Nunez VINDICATED. Twenty CIA and FBI agents have blown the whistle, confirming that Barack Hussein Obama and his Chief of Staff, CIA Director John Brennan, created the false Russia hoax, falsified intelligence in an attempt to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016 and overthrow the duly elected president of the United States in 22017, and locked the report in a CIA vault for nearly a decade. On March 21, 2017, Devin Nunes traveled to the White House and informed President Trump that he was being overthrown. The following day, March 22, 2017, he stood alone, holding an unexpected press conference confirming that Barack Obama had spied on Trump and the Trump campaign. On April 17, 2017, Nunes was forced to step aside from the House Intelligence Committee’s Obama–Russia inquiry — because Paul Ryan is a piece of garbage. Meanwhile, the piece of shit @SenAdamSchiff continued deceiving the American people and attempted to overthrow the sitting President of the United States two more times over the next six years, until Kevin McCarthy finally removed him from the House Intel Committee in 2023 — along with his girlfriend Eric ‘fang fang’ Swalwell,. Now, give the man @DevinNunes the Presidential Medal of Freedom—at once.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker stated that the intelligence community repeatedly and incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition. Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting. The speaker also confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked. He emphasized that none of this surveillance was related to Russia or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team.
The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate the surveillance and its subsequent dissemination to determine several questions: who was aware of it; why it was not disclosed to Congress; who requested and authorized the additional unmasking; whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates; and whether any laws, regulations, or procedures were violated. The speaker said he has asked the directors of the FBI, the NSA, and the CIA to expeditiously comply with his March 15 letter and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities. He noted that he informed Speaker Ryan of this new information this morning and that he would be going to the White House this afternoon to share what he knows with the president and his team.
Before taking questions, the speaker referenced a recent event, expressing concern over a terrorist attack in the United Kingdom and extending thoughts and prayers to friends and allies across the pond. He added that intelligence reports clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, at least, monitored and disseminated in intelligence and what appears to be, though not raw, intelligence reporting channels.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning or good afternoon, everyone. I recently confirmed that on numerous occasions, the intelligence community incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition. Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting. Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked. And fourth and finally, I wanna be clear, none of this surveillance was related to Russia or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team.
The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination to determine a few things here that I wanna read off. Who was aware of it? Why it was not disclosed to congress? Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking? Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?
And whether any laws, regulations, or procedures were violated. I've asked the directors of FBI, NSA, and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15 letter that you all received a couple weeks ago and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities. I informed speaker Ryan this morning of this new information, and I will be going to the White House this afternoon to share what I know with the president and his team. Before I get to questions, I wanna say that, as you know, there's just been a what appears to be a terrorist attack in The United Kingdom. Obviously, very concerned, and our thoughts and prayers go out to our strong friends and allies over across the pond.
I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored and disseminated out in intelligence and what appears to be raw or or I shouldn't say raw, but, intelligence reporting channels.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a secret recording, I reveal Jeff DeWit, the Arizona GOP chair, trying to bribe Kari Lake to skip the Senate race; when rebuffed, he suggests they could rig the election—twice—because powerful people want to keep her out. The exchange asks if she can be bought; she says, “This is not about money. It’s about our country.” Also noted are FBI Director Kash and AG Pam Bondi.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: Bribery—caught on secret recording: Arizona Republican Party Chair Jeff DeWit caught on a secret recording trying to bribe @KariLake not to run for the Senate. That didn’t work—so they rigged the election instead, not once, but twice. “There are very powerful people who want to keep you out,” he said. At one point during the recording, @KariLake was asked to name her “number.” DeWit: “Just say, is there a number at which—” Lake: “I can be bought? That’s what it’s about?” DeWit: “You can take a pause for a couple of years. You can go right back to what you’re doing.” Lake: “This is not about money. It’s about our country.” @FBIDirectorKash @AGPamBondi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on whether political opponents or powerful interests would buy off or influence a candidate, and what that would mean for a political race and the country. Speaker 0 questions if a price exists to “be bought,” and both eventually reject money as the primary issue, insisting the matter is about the country itself. They discuss the idea that fresh faces are needed because no one in a federal race has ever lost and then won, though Speaker 0 contests that notion as a possibility.
They reference powerful people in the East who want to keep the candidate out and are willing to spend heavily, making the conversation forbidden and not to be repeated. A fear is expressed that someone might be offered financial incentives, such as being placed on a payroll to be kept out of the race. They acknowledge the presence of entities willing to “put their money where their mouth is” and the risk that they would “murder” or eliminate opponents to stop certain candidates, describing a dangerous political landscape.
The dialogue shifts to the cartel and corruption, with mentions that “the cartel is operating in 50 states,” though details about who knows what are avoided. They discuss the strategy of staying on “the team” of those who want to influence the race, suggesting creditors or backers aim to control the candidate’s actions and align them with a globalist agenda. There is insistence that the person should not “scratch their back” for others in Washington, viewing DC as a “back scratching club.”
Speaker 1 argues that defeating Trump is a central aim, claiming that DeSantis is not America first and that removing Trump would be a dangerous outcome for the country. Speaker 0 expresses support for Trump but questions whether he can win again, suggesting the real issue is money and the ability to raise funds to win. They note that consultants benefit from a continuing cycle of money and that those consultants do not want their payday to end.
A key sentiment is resistance to being controlled or owned, with Speaker 1 declaring he will not accept backroom deals and will be “the biggest pain” to those trying to control him. They discuss public support and the importance of defending their movement and the people of Arizona, stressing a commitment to carry their torch and voice. The dialogue ends with a defiant vow to continue, even if it risks dangerous retaliation, and a readiness to persevere rather than pause on the battlefield.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there a number at which
Speaker 1: I can be bought? Can I be bought? That's what it's about. You can take a pause
Speaker 0: for a couple of years.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: And then go right
Speaker 1: back to what you're doing. No. 10,000,000, 20,000,000, third no. No. No.
A billion? No. This is not about money. This is about our country. I think it's disturbing that they would even
Speaker 0: that anybody would think this is I I no. To be fair, even me. Even me. I'll say this. I want a fresh face right now for the reason that I've never seen anyone.
I can't think of a single person in a federal race who lost, ran in won. I can't think of it. If you can think of it, let me know.
Speaker 1: I am not going to let these people who hate our country tell me not to run. You should call them and tell them to get behind me. So what's going on? What is I'm assuming this is our friend.
Speaker 0: Oh, this is this is this is back east. They there are very powerful people that wanna keep you out. I know
Speaker 1: they do.
Speaker 0: But they're willing to put their money where their mouth is in a big way. So this conversation never happened. The this is crazy, though.
Speaker 1: They should want me. I'm a great candidate. People love me. These people are corrupt.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe a rat. They are they are corrupt. Maybe a Don't don't go. You never know. I don't get myself in trouble.
This if if you if you say no, which is fine. It's your choice. Don't tell people.
Speaker 1: I know. They're gonna have try to have me murdered.
Speaker 0: I don't doubt that either. It's a world man. If that stuff that came out last week is right about the cartel stuff, I mean. I the cartel is operating in 50 states right now, like, 50. You know?
So
Speaker 1: So what what what's going on? Who is it? What
Speaker 0: Forget the who. Let me just tell you the what. I just say there are people calling around saying, oh, gosh. No. They can't repeat this.
Never repeat this. If you say no, don't because they I got offered to buy a house.
Speaker 1: Don't talk. Yeah. Don't talk.
Speaker 0: Because then we lose our ability to get things done other in the future.
Speaker 1: Here's this my problem. Yeah. Rather than just say, let's work with her. She's a great candidate because they don't own me and it pisses me off.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I said I don't if it's about ownership.
Speaker 1: It's about control.
Speaker 0: I don't know if it's about control. It's about being on
Speaker 1: the team.
Speaker 0: I guess that's you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? They wanna be on the team.
Speaker 0: They want you to be on their team.
Speaker 1: But their team.
Speaker 0: You know? But if they're pushing a globalist agenda,
Speaker 1: I can't do that. So what do they want? What do they want me to do?
Speaker 0: They want you to stay opportunist. But I'll tell you what I can offer you. But I said you can do whatever you want. It's talking head. It's the ask of me was it's kinda funny.
So the the ask I got today from back east was is this he has to sit with us. Was is there any companies out there or something that could just put her on the payroll and give her to keep her out? And I said, what do you want him to do? Whatever you need to do.
Speaker 1: This is about defeating Trump. And I think that's a bad, bad thing for our country. DeSantis is not America first. This is about the final death blow to Trump, and I don't think that's good for our country.
Speaker 0: I mean, I love Trump. I mean, I love Trump.
Speaker 1: It's not good for our country, Jeff.
Speaker 0: It's not. But at the same time, I'm not even sure Trump can win again. I don't know that he can win. I think what it really comes down to for a lot of people, it's not only about like control or agenda, it's just about the ability to raise money to win. You know?
If you really wanna know all of Qualysics, Qualysics Qualysics the money. I think. Absolutely. And even on their end, what makes them the most money?
Speaker 1: I know. These all these consultants don't want their their payday to end. And I don't wanna make a deal with these kind of people. This is a hill worth dying on. I I'm not if they're gonna steal the election to make me and our our movement go away, I'm not letting him do that.
I owe it to the people of Arizona. Or To carry their torch and their voice.
Speaker 0: Or you don't go away, but you pause.
Speaker 1: This is the battles right now, Jeff.
Speaker 0: You pause and refill your cockers.
Speaker 1: No. The battle is right now. The battle is right now, and we don't have time to to pause on this battlefield.
Speaker 0: You're not what you can't scratch their back. It's not for you.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: You don't even know. And they're sitting around people that have something to offer you. You know I mean? It's just it's it's a it's a back scratching club. That's all DC is.
It's a big back scratching club. You're in no you're in no position to scratch anybody's back, and you've already been in knowing that if you get there, you're gonna scratch anybody's back. I don't scratch people's back.
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 0: I was I've been on the outs with a lot of people for long time because I don't scratch my ass.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. You
Speaker 0: know? Where are we in two years if they steal the election again?
Speaker 1: Listen to what you're saying. Why don't we do something about it? What can do? So that we, the people, can pick our
Speaker 0: What can we do?
Speaker 1: I'm not willing to accept that. Then I'm gonna be the biggest pain in these people. Go back and tell them that. I'm running, and I'm gonna be the biggest pain in their.
Speaker 0: And I'm willing to tell them that.
Speaker 1: And they're gonna have to kill me to stop me.
Speaker 0: No. I know. I know. Look.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: The Financial Armageddon: the founder Barack Hussein Obama. Senator Trey Stewart: “This is just the tip of the iceberg, folks.” “Fraud by design. This wasn’t an accident. This didn’t just happen. It’s a system that’s designed by the left for people in their social circles. It starts all the way at the top with the federal government, with the Barack Obama administration; • Promulgated even more by the Biden administration; • It runs down to the states, to governors across the country, including Governor Walz and Governor Mills; • Even at the local level.”
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: The State Government of Arizona Has Been Overthrown. An expert who has certified Arizona voting machines for the last nine years CONFIRMS the error on Election Day, November 8, 2022, that crippled 260 of the 446 voting machines—“that error was intentional.” Additionally, a RUNBECK WHISTLEBLOWER: CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT That Runbeck printed approximately 300,000 ballots and illegally inserted them into the tally—not coming from drop boxes, not coming from polling locations, but instead being brought in by employees—for the Arizona 2022 General Election, effectively overthrowing the state government of Arizona. 📝@KariLake is the only candidate in U.S. history to hold the offices of governor and senator simultaneously.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting newly declassified docs cited by Grassley, claiming the DOJ IG found Comey failed to fully investigate Hillary’s emails and that Obama ordered not to arrest her, even acting as her lawyer and pushing an ICA to overturn the government. It says the IC IG confirms Hillary guilty under the Espionage Act for emails with SAPs, several dozen at CONF/SECRET/TS/SAP levels. It also mentions Petraeus, Lisa Page, and calls Wray and Barr traitors.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: NEWLY DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS released by @ChuckGrassley show that the DOJ Inspector General concluded FBI Director James Comey deliberately FAILED to conduct a thorough and complete investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. Meaning, the FBI and the DOJ were ordered by Barack Obama not to arrest Hillary Clinton for espionage. In fact, Barack Obama effectively served as Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer—and ordered a new ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment)—to overthrow the United States government instead!! IT’S A FACT. Intelligence Community Inspector General CONFIRMS Hillary Clinton is guilty under the Espionage Act, in violation of — 18 U.S. Code § 793. Gathering, transmitting or losing of national defense information. “Hillary Clinton emails on her unsecured personal server in her bathroom closet contained intelligence from the U.S. government’s most secretive and highly classified operation called ‘Special Access Programs’ or SAPs.” THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL Charles McCullough II.: “The comprehensive review by the intelligence agencies who have final say of classification matters found ‘Several dozen emails containing classified information at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, and TOP SECRET/SAP levels.’ “That is even more sensitive than top secret.” “There is no mistake, you don’t accidentally stumble across it not realize what it is.” — According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from Special Access Programs (SAPs) with his biographer and mistress Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Hillary Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009. CIA John Ratcliffe: “Lisa Page confirmed to me under oath that the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," 📝 By the way, Christopher Wray and William f**king Barr should be tried for treason for defying the President of the United States.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senate Republicans are reopening the Hillary Clinton email case. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley claims that a Justice Department inspector general report from 2018 has just been released. Grassley says that the new documents prove the FBI did not look thoroughly at all the thumb drives related to the Clinton email probe. He notes that he attempted to obtain these documents in 2019 and 2020, during the first years of the Trump presidency, but was unable to do so. When asked why, there is no word yet, and there has been no response as of tonight from Hillary Clinton’s team. The update was acknowledged by anchors, with Brett thanking David and promising to follow the development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton. Senate Republicans now opening up her email case once again. Right. That's right. Senate judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley claims a justice department inspector general report from 2018 has just been released.
Grassley says new documents prove the FBI did not look thoroughly at all the thumb drives related to the Clinton email probe. It's notable that Grassley says he tried in 2019 and 2020 when Trump was president the first time to get these documents out, but he couldn't. No word why when we asked, and no response yet tonight from secretary Clinton's team. We'll follow it. Brett.
Okay. David, thank you. We'll follow it on.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a State Department official claims Democrats, via the Biden–Harris administration, knowingly import criminals daily. He says USAID spent over $4 billion, asserts the Great Replacement Theory is real, and that the goal is to alter U.S. demographics to overthrow the Constitutional Republic. He alleges Mexicans labeled as “garbage” are sent here, urges Republicans to codify Trump’s policies, and adds that James O’Keefe is the news.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: A State Department official confirms it all: The Democrats, via the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, knew and deliberately imported criminals from around the world on a daily basis. Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign aid and bribes across the Western Hemisphere, confirms on videotape: “I wish people knew that we’re letting in criminals daily.” Despite USAID pouring over $4 billion into programs over four years, the “Great Replacement Theory” is real—the deliberate importation and protection of illegal immigrants is intended to fundamentally alter—and ultimately overthrow—the Constitutional Republic of the United States, and take down Western civilization with it. — The State Department official, Daniel Fitzgerald, affirmed: “Oh, yeah. So all the good, honest, hardworking Mexicans stay in Mexico, and all the pieces of garbage come to the United States. And the Mexican government has no reason to stop it, because their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to them.” — When asked about the ultimate goal behind such policies, the official responded: “They want to change the demographics of the United States. Traditional, standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans are all leftists. It literally is. It’s just—it literally is essential to try to change the demographics of the United States.” 📝 In other words, the Democrats’ goal is crystal clear—to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States—so it is imperative that the f**king losers—the Republican Majority Congress—codify Trump’s policies into law. And @JamesOKeefeIII is the news!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss immigration and migration as the central issue for their region. They express a belief that immigration policies are letting criminals into the country daily and emphasize the need for the world to know this. They note a large shift in migration patterns, with migrants coming from Central America as well as Venezuela, despite substantial U.S. aid to the region.
They describe a U.S. aid strategy they call the root causes strategy, which involves giving money to support and develop the origins of migrants so people can stay where they are. Specifically, they mention pouring 4 billion dollars over four years into Central America and question whether it is effective, acknowledging the continued flow of migrants despite the aid.
There is mention of how the aid is allocated: some of it goes to female prisons in Mexico to help train inmates, and there is reference to working on gender issues in Pakistan aimed at recruiting, retaining, and advancing more women in law enforcement. They raise the broader question of whether U.S. taxpayer money should be spent in other countries on these issues, noting that some people claim “women simply don’t seem to care about” certain issues.
Speaker 2 frames the discussion with formal gratitude to the committee and indicates upcoming briefings on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill, highlighting migration as a big issue for their region and asking what is being done to stop migration. The dialogue reflects uncertainty about how to respond to migration and whether the administration can or will justify the policy choices.
The speakers discuss the political impact of migration and aid, suggesting that “the end all be all” solution for politics does not exist, and that the other side might gain advantages from perceived failures. They observe that the public view of migration has evolved and that attitudes toward the issue are politically consequential.
There is a provocative assertion comparing criminal elements among migrants to the worst criminals in the United States, and a hypothetical claim about if the worst criminals went to Canada, billions of dollars would be sent back, implying a desire to limit illegal entries or criminal migrants. They debate how to adjust the quality of entrants, proposing that a metric change—allowing a high number of entrants only if they have no criminal records and are not in the country illegally—could alter outcomes.
Finally, they discuss perceived demographic shifts in the United States, noting that traditional Americans and Latin Americans have different political leanings, with a suggestion that demographics are being shifted by migration and related policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's gotta be something that
Speaker 1: you're like, man, I wish I could tell tell
Speaker 0: the world about this. There's a lot of things. But mostly mostly went to immigration. I wish people knew they were letting in criminals daily.
Speaker 1: The big issue for the the hell for our region is migration. So we poured a lot of money into Central America. Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years, but now migrants are coming from us in there. Nice.
Like Venezuela.
Speaker 0: So
Speaker 2: what is the end goal? Why are they allowing children? A lot
Speaker 0: of children The United States.
Speaker 1: So our aid goes to female prisons in Mexico. Some of them. Yeah. Yeah. To, like, help train them up.
Speaker 0: We're working with gender issues in Pakistan. So we're trying to recruit retain and advance more women in law enforcement. So when it comes to should we be spending US taxpayers money in another country on this issue? Women simply don't seem to care about.
Speaker 1: Secretary Lincoln, how close are you to him? Five degrees separation. This is such a niche industry that flies under the radar. You have the average American version of them. Most people don't know what we do.
Speaker 2: Mister chairman, thank you very much to you, our ranking member, Rish, all the members of the committee, and thank you for the opportunity to testify today.
Speaker 1: He has briefings coming up in two weeks. He has briefings? Yeah. On the hill. About the f y twenty twenty five budget request.
And that's, like, with all the congressional people. Big issue for the the hill for our region is migration. Stop Oh migration. What are we doing to stop migration? He's not accountable for that, isn't he?
Yeah. We do stuff for it. Oh, do you? Yeah. Oh, I didn't realize that.
It's called the root causes strategy. Oh. How's How's It's giving money to support and help people at where they the origins of the migrants are so they feel like they can stay there instead of migrating out. So it's Central America, basically. It's what?
It's basically Central America. Like Right. Support and development. Oh. So we poured a lot of money into Central America.
Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years. Oh. It's like a lot of money for those places.
Speaker 0: It's a
Speaker 1: lot of money. Is it doing anything? I think for them, yes. But now migrants are coming from us in there. Nice.
Like Venezuela. So we're like, oh, this would solve that problem. No. So what did you say to that? That looks bad for the administration, doesn't it?
Yeah. Oh, it looks bad for any administration. Because no one sells my group. Like the end all be all, like, pill pill for politics. Right.
And I feel like I feel like if anything, the other side's gonna win because of it. I know. My dad used to complain about that. Like, oh, and, like, in my mind, I'm like, oh, that's not that much. And then I see the chart.
I'm like, oh, that's a lot. That's Yeah. Like, compared to, like, twenty years ago. I'm just like, wait. They're on to something.
And I don't know what to say to that. I I really don't. I literally don't know. Like, what what would the administration say to that? I don't know.
And, like, I sit there too. I'm and I talk with my coworker who, like, manages the migration process, foreign assistance. And I we always talk every time. I'm like, I don't know what we do. Like Right.
There's no clear answer.
Speaker 0: Do they do do they do things within the foreign affairs department, like, that we'll have, like, this money going through the limit. I mean, there's gotta be
Speaker 1: some things that you're like, man, I wish I could tell tell the
Speaker 0: world about this. Oh, there's a lot of things. Mostly mostly with immigration immigration because that's the one that we're wish I people knew that we're letting in criminals daily. Like, when I was in Do you have the confirmation of that? You have confirmation of that?
Oh, yeah. So, like, so all the good, honest, hard work in Mexicans stay in Mexico and all the pieces of garbage into The United States. And those are the ones that we like. We are literally and the Mexican government has no reason to stop it because these their their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to a world. Like, imagine if the worst of the worst, if all the criminals in The US is we're all going to Canada, sending back billions of dollars a year.
I would just stop that. I wouldn't even change the numbers of like, if we let in a 100,000 Mexicans a year. I'm like, let in a 100,000 Mexicans a year, it's just change the quality of the applicant. Like, you know, say a 100,000 Mexicans, but you can't have them in The US illegally. You can't have a criminal record.
Speaker 2: So what is the end goal? Why aren't they allowing There's lot of
Speaker 0: change in demographics in The United States. They're really good. Because, I mean, no. Honestly, the the people from Nebraska, my friends all the Like, Americans that have my family's been in United States for four hundred years. Traditional standard Americans are not leftists.
Latin Americans all do are leftist. And it's just it literally is a search just to try try to change it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I say the 1979 Iranian revolution wasn’t grassroots but a Carter CIA State Department operation funded by USAID, comparing Khomeini to Gandhi, aided by the French, to secure a better oil deal than the 1954 plan. Peter Jennings did propaganda. Today, the same culprits run operations like Brazil 2022 and the 2020 U.S. election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
The 1979 revolution in Iran was not a grassroots movement. It was a Carter CIA and State Department operation, funded by USAID, in which the administration compared Ayatollah Khomeini to Mahatma Gandhi—supplied by the French government—all to secure a better oil deal than the 1954 agreement that was set to expire in 1979. Peter Jennings was right there for propaganda purposes. In other words: if you’re planning to topple governments, reach out to the CIA, the State Department, and USAID. For psychotic Islamic dictators, call the French. Think about it: a turban-wearing Islamic mullah stepping off the plane—how did anyone think that was going to work out? Today, the same culprits have evolved into operations like the 2022 in Brazil and the 2020 election right here at home.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes footage of Ayatollah Khomeini on a plane returning to Iran from Paris, with an interview by Peter Jennings. Jennings asks how Khomeini feels about his triumphant return. Khomeini reflects, noting the question about whether the French are their friends. The discussion then questions why the Ayatollah would be sent back to Iran to inherit a deadly anti-American revolution if that wasn’t America’s intention, and answers that this is what America wanted. It is stated that the CIA and the State Department advised Jimmy Carter that “we know this guy. Khomeini, he’s not so bad. He was part of a Shiite group that we helped to agitate against Mohammed Mosaddegh back in ’53. We can work with him.” The transcript ends with a claim that a State Department official, William Sullivan, compared Khomeini to Mahatma Gandhi.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did find footage of the Ayatollah on the plane on the way back to Iran from Paris, France. Oh, yeah. And he's being interviewed by Peter Jennings Yeah. Who's asking him, so how do you feel about your triumphant return to Iran right now in this kind of thing? Well, I remember even as a kid wondering, aren't the French our friends?
And why would they send the Ayatollah back to Iran to inherit this deadly anti American revolution if that wasn't what America wanted? But the answer is that is what America wanted. The CIA and the state department had advised Jimmy Carter that we know this guy. Khomeini, he's not so bad. He was part of a Shiite group that we helped to agitate against Mohammed Mosaddegh back in '53.
We can work with him. And the state department guy named William Sullivan, I believe he was the ambassador, William Sullivan compared him to Mahatma Gandhi.
reSee.it AI Summary
I hear a leaked audio showing Pennsylvania officials couldn’t reconcile 2020, yet Shapiro certified the overthrow of the United States government by force. “Everyone in there was sweating bullets.” Virtually every Secretary of State who participated in 2020 was self-promoted.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A leaked audio recording confirming that Pennsylvania election officials could not reconcile the 2020 election—yet Josh Shapiro certified the overthrow of the United States government anyway by force. “Everyone in there was sweating bullets because they thought they were going to be taken away in cuffs.” 📝 Virtually every Secretary of State who participated in the conspiracy during 2020 was self-promoted.
Video Transcript AI Summary
People come in from what I can sell consider well heeled, and say, well, you know, I know if I send it down there, you figure out where it was. Well, what we could be.
I think I was from, a legal standpoint. If it, like, legally has to be attached to it. Or if you just need to be with it so you know which tapes came from which precinct and belong to which return sheet.
I think it's a combination of both but legally you have to have it. The issues that we had when we did the reconciliation is that we were to reconcile the number of people voted with the yellow books and then with the return to balance. I mean, we haven't even talked about reconciling the used and unused balance and I presume that's something we can do down the road but it would it was it was not easy and these poor people came in there and they were sweating bullets because they all thought they were going to weapon cuffs. It's it has to be stressed that that tape has to be attached.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. People come in from what I can sell consider well heeled, and say, well, you know, I know if I send it down there, you figure out where it was. Well, what we could be.
Speaker 1: So I think I was from, a legal standpoint. If it, like, legally has to be attached to it. Or if you just need to be with it so you know which tapes came from which precinct and belong to which return sheet.
Speaker 0: I think it's a combination of both but legally you have to have it. The the issues that we had when we did the reconciliation is that we were to reconcile the number of people voted with the yellow books and then with the return to balance. I mean, we haven't even talked about reconciling the used and unused balance and I presume that's something we can do down the road but it would it was it was not easy and these poor people came in there and they were sweating bullets because they all thought they were going to weapon cuffs. It's it has to be stressed that that tape has to be attached.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a California sheriff’s claim that Gavin Newsom steals elections by an “honor system” online voter registration: you click a box, you’re registered, you get an email, and you’re mailed a ballot in every election. He says an audit of the recall will show illegal aliens, and that the Scum has been successfully recalled.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A California sheriff describes how Gavin Newsom steals elections—has effectively placed illegal aliens on an honor system to vote. “The online voter registration system seems to be an ‘honor system’—all you have to do is click a box and say that you’re not lying. Then you’ll get an email from the Secretary of State saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you’re on the voter rolls, any time an election comes around, guess what? You get mailed a ballot, right?” 📝 An audit of his recall election will find exactly that—illegal aliens. The Scum has been successfully recalled.
Video Transcript AI Summary
You're able to register even if and cast a vote if you don't live in the in the country as evident of his brother in Pakistan. I think we have some evidence of two or three other people out of the country that voted. Is that correct? Yeah. Approximately two or three other people out of the country as well as people residing outside the district.
Okay. The online voter registration system, it seems to be an honor system. Anybody can put information in there to to register a vote. All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying, and then you'll get an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, guess what?
You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote. So we found that a little bit problem
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're able to register even if and cast a vote if you don't live in the in the country as evident of his brother in Pakistan. I think we have some evidence of two or three other people out of the country that voted. Is that correct? Yeah. Approximately two or three other people out of the country as well as people residing outside the district.
Okay. The online voter registration system, it seems to be an honor system. Anybody can put information in there to to register a vote. All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying, and then you'll get an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, guess what?
You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote. So we found that a little bit problem
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a California sheriff claiming Gavin Newsom steals elections by an honor-system online registration: you click a box, say you’re not lying, get an email, and you’re on the voter rolls, then you’re mailed a ballot. He says an audit of the recall will show illegal aliens, and that the Scum has been recalled.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: A California sheriff describes how Gavin Newsom steals elections—has effectively placed illegal aliens on an honor system to vote. “The online voter registration system seems to be an ‘honor system’—all you have to do is click a box and say that you’re not lying. Then you’ll get an email from the Secretary of State saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you’re on the voter rolls, any time an election comes around, guess what? You get mailed a ballot, right?” 📝 An audit of his recall election will find exactly that—illegal aliens. The Scum has been successfully recalled.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses registering and voting from outside the country, citing Pakistan as an example. He mentions evidence of two or three other people out of the country who voted, as well as people residing outside the district.
He describes the online voter registration system as an honor system, saying anybody can enter information to register to vote. He states, “All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying,” after which you’ll receive an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying, “thank you for registering to vote,” and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, “guess what? You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote.” He concludes by noting, “So we found that a little bit problema.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're able to register even if and cast a vote if you don't live in the in the country as evident of his brother in Pakistan. I think we have some evidence of two or three other people out of the country that voted. Is that correct? Yeah. Approximately two or three other people out of the country as well as people residing outside the district.
Okay. The online voter registration system, it seems to be an honor system. Anybody can put information in there to to register a vote. All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying, and then you'll get an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, guess what?
You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote. So we found that a little bit problema
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official, on video confirms that despite $4B in USAID, the “Great Replacement Theory” is real—the deliberate importation and protection of illegal immigrants aims to alter and overthrow the U.S. constitutional republic. He says, “Oh, yeah… all the good, honest Mexicans stay… and all the pieces of garbage come to the United States,” and that their goal is to change U.S. demographics; Democrats seek to overthrow the Republic and codify Trump’s policies, “f**king losers.”
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is: A State Department official CONFIRMS IT ALL: Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign aid and bribes across the Western Hemisphere, CONFIRMS on videotape: Despite USAID pouring over $4 billion into programs over four years, the “Great Replacement Theory” is real—the deliberate importation and protection of illegal immigrants is intended to fundamentally alter—and ultimately overthrow—the Constitutional Republic of the United States, and take down Western civilization with it. — The State Department official, Daniel Fitzgerald, affirmed: “Oh, yeah. So all the good, honest, hardworking Mexicans stay in Mexico, and all the pieces of garbage come to the United States. And the Mexican government has no reason to stop it, because their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to them.” — When asked about the ultimate goal behind such policies, the official responded: “They want to change the demographics of the United States. Traditional standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans are all leftists. It literally is. It’s just—it literally is essential to try to change the demographics of the United States.” 📝 In other words, the Democrats’ goal is crystal clear—to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States—so it is imperative that the Republican Congress codify Trump’s policies into law—the f**king losers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss immigration and U.S. foreign aid policy, focusing on roots, outcomes, and political implications.
They begin with a provocative assertion: immigration is a major issue, with Speaker 0 claiming, “mostly with immigration… I wish people knew that we’re letting in criminals daily.” The speakers note migration as a central concern for the region, describing large U.S. aid to Central America—“4,000,000,000 over four years”—and acknowledging migrants now arriving from other places, including Venezuela.
The dialogue questions the end goals of policy, asking, “What is the end goal? Why are they allowing children?” and “So what does he say to that?” along with a reference that “a lot of children” are involved. Speaker 2 mentions aid directed to female prisons in Mexico and to work on training, and to gender issues in Pakistan, noting initiatives to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. A lingering question is asked: should U.S. taxpayers’ money be spent in their own country on these issues when they are described as fatal or concerning to others.
The conversation shifts to specifics of administration and oversight: “Secretary Lincoln, how close are you to him? Five degrees separation.” The group references briefings on the FY2025 budget request and budget cycles, then reiterates the migration issue with a call to “stop migration.” They discuss a “root cause strategy” involving funding to address migrants at their origins, “Central America, basically,” aiming to support development there.
A critical point is the assertion of substantial U.S. funding to the region and the concern that migrants are still coming from elsewhere, notably Venezuela, which “looks bad for the administration.” The dialogue notes the difficulty of finding a clear answer, with a sense that the other side might benefit politically. The speakers reflect on the scale of the funding relative to past decades and acknowledge uncertainty about what is effectively changing.
There is talk of internal discussions with colleagues who manage migration processes and foreign assistance, with admissions of confusion or lack of clear messaging: “I don’t know what we do… there’s no clear answer.” They touch on messaging about immigration, including a belief that “we’re letting in criminals daily,” and contrast the status of “good, honest, hard work” Mexicans who stay in Mexico with others who come to the United States.
Towards the end, Speaker 0 argues that traditional Americans—“Nebraska… Americans that have my family’s been in United States for four hundred years”—are not leftists, while stating that Latin Americans are leftist, framing it as a broader political and societal divide connected to immigration policies. They propose a hypothetical: allowing 100,000 Mexicans a year if they are not in the country illegally and have no criminal record, suggesting a quality filter on entrants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's gotta be something that
Speaker 1: you're like, man, I wish I could tell tell the
Speaker 0: world about this. Oh, there's a lot of things. But mostly mostly with immigration. I wish people knew that we're letting in criminals daily.
Speaker 2: The big issue for the the hell for our region is migration. So we poured a lot of money into Central America. Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years. But now migrants are coming from elsewhere.
Nice. Like Venezuela.
Speaker 0: So
Speaker 1: what is the end goal? Why are they allowing children? A lot
Speaker 0: of children The United States, David.
Speaker 2: So our aid goes to female prisons in Mexico. Some of them. Yeah. Yeah. To, like, help train them up.
Speaker 0: Working with gender issues and Pakistan. So we're trying to recruit retain and advance more women in law enforcement. This question becomes do we should we be spending US taxpayers money in our country on this issue when it's a fatal thing they care about.
Speaker 2: Secretary Lincoln, how close are you to him? Five degrees separation. This is such a niche industry that flies under the radar. You have the average American version of them. People don't know what we do.
Mister chairman, thank you very much to you, our ranking member, Rish, all the members of the committee, and thank you for the opportunity to testify today. He has briefings coming up in two weeks. He has briefings? Yeah. On the hill.
About The f y twenty twenty five budget request. And that's, like, with all the congressional people. Big issue for the the hill for our region is migration. Oh my. Stop migration.
What are we doing to stop migration? He's not accountable for that, is he? Yeah. We do stuff for it. Oh, do you?
Yeah. Uh-huh. I didn't realize that. It's called the root cause of strategy. Oh.
How's It's giving money to support and help people at where they the origins of the migrants are, so they feel like they can stay there instead of migrating out. So it's Central America, basically. It's what? It's basically Central America, like support and development. Oh.
So we poured a lot of money into Central America. Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years. Suck a lot of money from those places. That's a lot of money.
Is it doing anything? I think for them, yes. But now migrants are coming from elsewhere. Like Venezuela. We're like, oh, this would solve that problem.
Oh, no. So what does he say to that? That looks bad for the administration, doesn't it? Yeah. Oh, it looks bad for any administration.
Because no one sells my group. It's like the end all be all, like, pill pill for politics. Right. And I feel like I feel like if anything, the other side's gonna win because of it. I know.
My dad used to complain about that. I'm like, oh, and like, in my mind, I'm like, oh, that's not that much. And then
Speaker 0: I see
Speaker 2: the chart, I'm like, oh, that's a lot. That's Like, compared to, like, twenty years ago. I'm like, I'm a wait there on to something. And I don't know what to say to that. I I really don't.
I literally don't know. Like, what what would the administration say to that? Hell no. And, like, I sit there too. I'm and I talk with my coworker who, like, manages the migration process, foreign assistance.
And I we always talk every time. Like, I don't know what we do. Like Right. There's no clear answer.
Speaker 0: Do they do do they do things that the foreign affairs department said that we'll have to put this money going to eliminate? I mean, there's gotta be something that
Speaker 1: you're like, man, I wish I
Speaker 0: could tell tell the world about this. Oh, there's a lot of things. Mostly mostly with immigration. Immigration because that's the one that we're in collections really good form of immigration. I wish people knew that we're letting in criminals daily.
Like, when I was in You have the confirmation of that. You have confirmation of that. Oh, yeah. So they so all the good, honest, hard work in Mexicans stay in Mexico and all the pieces of garbage to United States. And those are the ones that we like.
And we are literally and the Mexican government has no reason to stop it because these their their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to it. Like, imagine if the worst are the worst, and all the criminals in The United States were all in Canada sending back billions of dollars a year. I would have sought that. I wouldn't even change the numbers of like, if we let in a 100,000 Mexicans a year, I'm like, let in a 100,000 Mexicans
Speaker 2: a year,
Speaker 0: just change the quality of the applicant. Like, the, you know, say a 100,000 Mexicans, but you can't have them in The US illegally. You can't have a criminal record.
Speaker 1: So what is the end goal? Why aren't they allowing
Speaker 0: They really do. Because I mean, no, honestly, the the people from Nebraska, like, my family's entire like, Americans that have my family's been in United States for four hundred years. Traditional standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans all are leftist. And it's just it literally is a search just to try try to change it.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Whether by design or not, replacement is an objective reality. The demographics make that clear.
@ClownWorld - Clown World ™ 🤡
Charlie was right
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount Matthew Perna, invited inside by Capitol Police, protesting for 14 minutes on January 6 for November 3. He pled guilty hoping for 6–12 months, only to learn the DOJ would seek a terrorism enhancement lifting his sentence to 9 years. Four days later, he hanged himself in his garage. They pursued Americans to prove November 3 was the ‘most secure election in U.S. history.’ I ask: where is the United States Attorney General? And the state media.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: Matthew Perna (seen in a red sweatshirt) on January 6, walking calmly inside the Capitol building for only 14 minutes to protest the overthrow of his government on November 3—after being invited in by Capitol Police, no less. Matthew pleaded guilty to the initial charges, believing he would face 6–12 months in prison. Only after pleading guilty did the domestic terrorists within the Department of Justice inform Matthew that they would seek a TERRORISM enhancement to his sentence, increasing his potential sentence to 9 years in federal prison. Just four days after receiving this news, Matthew went into his garage, put a fucking rope around his neck, and hung himself. In other words, they deliberately went after Americans and brought down the full weight of the U.S. government, including a death sentence, to prove a point—that November 3 was the ‘most secure election in U.S. history’. Now, where the fuck is the United States Attorney General? And damn you, the state media—every single one of you.
reSee.it AI Summary
The most shocking testimony of Nov 3, 2020: a Michigan poll watcher swore mail-in ballots aren’t in sequence; 2232 next to 2233, they come in with no dates. I believe 2020 was a treasonous conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government, and Jocelyn Benson belongs in prison.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: The single most shocking testimony of the November 3, 2020 election: Michigan poll watcher under oath: “These are absentee ballots—mail-in ballots. They cannot be in sequence. 2232 cannot have 2233 next to it because they are mailed in. They come in all different numbers, let alone without any dates.” 📝2020 was not an election. It was a treasonous conspiracy to overthrow the United States government. Jocelyn Benson belongs in prison.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes irregularities observed in absentee/mail-in ballots. They claim that the ballot numbers and the last names on the ballots were in sequence, which should not happen with mail-in ballots because those ballots are supposed to arrive at different times and cannot be sequential like 2-2-3-2 next to 2-2-3-3. This pattern triggered the speaker’s concern, leading them to think something was wrong.
The speaker states they began noticing that the numbers were almost adjacent to each other, with one hovering around the middle. This prompted them to raise questions about the process. They then asked the supervisor for clarification, but the supervisor reacted angrily, saying, “you’re not letting us do our job. You’re disturbing us.”
Feeling hesitant to push the issue further for fear of being kicked out and wanting to stay in the room due to a lack of other observers, the speaker chose not to challenge the process more than they already had. They allege that the sequence of ballot numbers came from the same area, specifically Goddard Street in Downtown Detroit, and that the signatures on those ballots were all alike.
The speaker notes several additional anomalies: envelopes had no date stamp, only the word “November 2020” without a more specific date, and there was no second or third numbering visible. They observed that none of these ballots were coming up in the voting system; instead, they were being entered manually. The speaker claims that the poll book or the system would not reflect these details, implying that the ballots were processed outside the normal electronic recordkeeping.
In summary, the speaker alleges a pattern of sequential ballot numbers and similar signatures associated with absentee ballots from a single street area, envelopes without proper dating, and manual entry into the system rather than through standard digital processing, with the supervisor resisting questions about these irregularities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Writing down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person of the ballot that that had the name on the ballot. They were all in sequence. These are absentee ballots, mail in mail in ballots. They cannot be in sequence. Two two three two cannot have two two three three next to it because if they're mailed in, they come in all different numbers.
And when when I started noticing that these numbers are almost next to each other, like one or the other was in the middle, but then they were almost next to each other, my my antennas went up. That's exactly when I thought something is not right here. Then I asked the supervisor. There was not even a date on those envelopes. It said November 2020.
There was no second number there. Then I said, what is the date on this one? Then they got really mad at me. They said, you're not letting us do our job. You're disturbing us.
And at that point because we really don't wanna be kicked out. You know? So we were just kinda not challenging anything because we wanna still stay in the room because we barely had anybody. Not only that, the sequence ballot numbers were all from the same area, like the Goddard Street in the Downtown Detroit. Goddard Street, sequential ballots, signatures were all alike.
They had no date stamped. It said like, it was empty after zero. There was no third or second or first or nothing. And they were none of them were coming up in the system. They were all being entered manually.
They even knew that none of these details would even be in the poll book or in the system.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that forensic experts testified under oath that election systems in Gwinnett County, GA, Colorado, Michigan and other swing states were remotely accessed from Belgrade, Serbia by Serbian nationals during the November 3, 2020 election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is, We the People v. Dominion Voting Systems RE: DOMINION EMAILS CONFIRM Forensic experts testifies under oath that the election system in Gwinnett County, Georgia, Colorado, Michigan and other swing states were remotely accessed from Belgrade, Serbia by Serbian nationals during the November 3, 2020 election.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss Dominion’s access to election systems during the 2020 election period in Georgia, with Gwinnett County cited as a specific example. The dialogue confirms that the questioning period was during the 2020 election, and the focus is on whether Dominion remotely accessed election systems and whether such access occurred in Georgia.
Speaker 2 asks if there is any indication of nonelection personnel remotely accessing a Dominion system. Speaker 3 responds that they have reviewed a series of emails produced by Dominion in which they’re discussing remoting into Gwinnett County, Georgia. Speaker 1 then notes that Speaker 0 had mentioned Dominion remote collection or connection to election systems but lacks evidence that it occurred in Georgia. Speaker 0 asserts that there was one county and that they have seen many Dominion emails, requiring translation from Serbian to English to verify technical questions and translations.
Speaker 1 asks specifically: “So it's your testimony that there is evidence of dominion remotely accessing Georgia election equipment?” Speaker 0 answers: “Yes, on the one county. It was included with stuff that I was researching and reading through considering Colorado. Michigan was also involved and there were other ones.”
Speaker 2 inquires about Dominion’s ability to remotely connect to these election systems and whether they could do so without detection. Speaker 0 responds: “Yes.” Speaker 2 then asks if the interviewee is aware of any instances in which that has occurred, and Speaker 0 confirms: “One would be the Denver, Colorado server was granted or requested to grant Belgrave, Only Belgrade. Did search. There is a Belgrade Montana.” The speaker questions why Montana would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server as part of the election system, noting there are other components and things done in the background concerning the database and the configuration of the database server that still do not have an engineering change order.
Speaker 0 explains that in operational environments, things sometimes break and need fixing, leading to the submission of a change request or, in this case, an engineering change order that is retroactive. The goal is to record the process to ensure change management and integrity of the system. If changes are not recorded, it leads to a bad situation, according to Speaker 0.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would be Gwinnett if I'm remembering correctly. There were several states involved.
Speaker 1: And which time period are you referring to?
Speaker 0: This was 2020.
Speaker 1: Before or after the election?
Speaker 0: During the election.
Speaker 2: In your examination of, any of these dominion systems, have you seen any indication of nonelection personnel remotely accessing a Dominion system? Yes. Can you tell us about that?
Speaker 3: I too have reviewed a a series of emails produced by Dominion in which they're discussing remoting into Gwinnett County, Georgia.
Speaker 1: You also mentioned Dominion remotely collect connecting to election systems, but you don't have any evidence that occurred in Georgia. Correct?
Speaker 0: There was one county. I've seen a lot of Dominion emails. I've had to translate Dominion emails from Serbian to English to verify the technical questions I was being asked about them to verify that it was translated properly.
Speaker 1: So it's your testimony that there is evidence of dominion remotely accessing Georgia election equipment?
Speaker 0: Yes, on the one county. It was included with stuff that I was researching and reading through considering Colorado. Michigan was also involved and there were other ones.
Speaker 2: To your understanding, is Dominion able, to remotely connect to these election systems? Yes. Are they able to do that without detection?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 2: And are you aware of any instances in which that has occurred? Yes. Can you identify those instances?
Speaker 0: One would be the Denver, Colorado server was granted or requested to grant Belgrave, Only Belgrade. Did search. There is a Belgrade Montana. Again, why would Montana need to connect into a Colorado file transfer server as part of election system? And there are other components and things that were done in the background concerning the database and the configure of the database server that still do not have an engineering change order.
Because if somebody works in an operational environments for a lot of different things, what I will tell you is sometimes things break or you have a problem and you have to fix it. And you you submit a change request or in this case an engineering change order that's retroactive. Right? You want to go back and make sure that you record the process so that you have change management and integrity of the system. If you do not record changes, you lead yourself down a a very bad
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the President signed an order revoking Chris Krebs’s security clearance and directed AG Pam Bondi to investigate him for alleged plans to overthrow the U.S. government on November 3, 2020. Krebs, head of CISA, is accused of weaponizing his role with the FBI and Big Tech to censor evidence about the 2020 election and to call November 3 the most “secure election in American history.” FOIA shows a secret election-day meeting by CISA with Dominion and FBI to discuss overthrow with private groups and Democrats.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: The President of the United States: —Just signed an order revoking Chris Krebs’s security clearance and has directed @AGPamBondi to investigate him for his role in the overthrow of the U.S. government on November 3, 2020. Krebs was the head of CISA, who weaponized his position and conspired with the FBI and Big Tech to censor—truth, evidence, proof, and testimony about the 2020 election—and who designated November 3, 2020, as the most “secure election in American history.” ——————— Freedom of Information Act: Documents obtained by investigative journalist @yehuda_miller through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveal: —A secret meeting organized on election day, November 3, 2020, by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), involving Dominion officials and the FBI, to discuss the overthrow of the United States government with private companies and Democratic groups.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christopher Krebs, the former head of CISA, is described as having weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in relation to a presidential memorandum involving the Department of Justice and other areas of government to investigate some “malign acts” he participated in while at CISA.
The other speaker responds, saying he does not know Krebs well, but notes Krebs appeared after the election and characterizes the election as rigged. He asserts the country’s problems followed from that election, including open borders with millions entering the country, and references broader geopolitical and security events such as Russia and Ukraine, the October 7 incident, and Afghanistan, describing the withdrawal as resulting in 13 dead and many others killed and injured. He contends Krebs claimed the election was great, but he argues it was not, citing lawsuits and lawyers signing hundreds of millions of dollars in support, and claims that legislative processes and various schemes demonstrated a corrupt election where COVID was used to cheat.
The speaker claims that Krebs asserted the election was the most secure in history, which he calls a disaster. He advocates for paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and a citizen certificate or piece of paper proving citizenship prior to voting. He argues for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting, and claims that delays in ballot boxes and air-conditioning changes affected election processes. The speaker asserts that the election was not safe and that the press has been dishonest, describing the press as not free.
The speaker adds that Krebs sat back as a member who appeared to be a Republican and claimed the election was safe from the start, but the speaker believes daily papers report increasing fraud. He states that Krebs is a fraud and a disgrace and asserts there will be an investigation into whether Krebs was right, with Krebs facing consequences if the election was not safe. He concludes that Krebs is a bad guy.
The final remark notes that the last two points are very important for the country, emphasizing the questions around Krebs’s role and the integrity of the election, and indicating a determination to determine whether Krebs was correct about the election’s safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christopher Krebs, the former head of CISA. This is a man who weaponized, his position, against free speech in the election context, in the context of COVID nineteen presidential memorandum to the one you just signed. It he might have and further instructs your department of justice, other aspects of your government, to investigate some of the malign acts that he participated in, while he was still head of CSO?
Speaker 1: This is another one. I don't know that I met him. I'm sure I met him, but I didn't know him. And he came out right after the election, which was a rigged election, badly rigged election. We did phenomenally in that election.
Look what happened to our country because of it open borders, millions of people coming into our country. Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened. October 7 would have never happened. Afghanistan, the way that they withdrew with 13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.
And maybe, I don't know, never mention, but I mention it. 42 or forty three people so badly injured, the legs, the arms, blown off the face. And, this is all because of a incompetent group of people that preceded us, and that would have never happened. And, this guy Krebs was saying, oh, the election was great. It was great.
Well, it's been proven that it was not only not great. When you look at all these lawyers and law firms that are signing, giving giving us hundreds of millions of dollars. It was proven by so many different ways in so many different forms from the legislatures not approving to to the that worked from the all of the different, scamming operations. It was a very corrupt election. They used COVID to cheat.
And, we're gonna find out about this guy too because this guy's a wise guy. He said, we've we've proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country. Now this was a disaster. And frankly, we should go to paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID. And one other thing, a vote you should get a little certificate that says you're a citizen of our country.
You get a citizen piece of paper that says you're a citizen before you can vote. But you want voter ID and you want paper ballots, and you really want same day voting. If you don't have same day voting, they decide to change the air condition. Oh, we're fixing the air let's move all these boxes. We'll bring them back in a few days, and then they don't bring back those boxes.
We're have safe elections. We have to have borders. Ideally, we have to have a free press, which we don't have. We don't have a free press. We have dishonest press.
This will be it's an honor. We're gonna find out whether or not he was right. This was a a disgraceful election, and this guy sat back saying, well, I'm a member or like he's a Republican or something. And right almost right from the beginning, and he he's tried to make the case that this election was a safe election. I think he said, this is the safest election we've ever had.
And yet, every day you read in the papers about more and more fraud that's discovered. He's the fraud. He's a disgrace. So we'll find out whether or not it was a safe election. And if it wasn't, he's got a big price to pay.
And he's a bad guy. Here's another one. I have no idea who he is. Krebs, I have no idea who he is. I'm sure he was in the room at some point just like you're all in the room, but I have no idea who he was.
So thank you very much. Those last two are very important, I think, for the country.
reSee.it AI Summary
I think this will also make you sick: United States military ballots. A Georgia election official, under oath, asks, “How the f*ck does 100% of military batches go to a vegetable hiding in a basement?” He says, “80–90% were going to Joe Biden... 100% of the batches were Biden. I find that statistically impossible.” He calls the 2020 election not an election but a treasonous conspiracy.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: This will also make you sick: United States military ballots Georgia election official, under oath: How the f*ck does 100% of military batches go to a vegetable hiding in a basement? “I estimated that somewhere between 80 and 90% were going to Joe Biden throughout the day. It kept making me sicker and sicker every time I saw another Biden, Biden, Biden. Then I’m going through batches—100% of the batches were Biden. I find that statistically impossible.” 📝 The 2020 election was not an election; it was a treasonous conspiracy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker stated: "I estimated that somewhere between 80-90% were going to Joe Biden." "Throughout the day, it kept making me sicker and sicker." "Every time I saw another Biden, Biden, Biden, and then I'm going through batches." "Batches, 100% of the batches were Biden." "I find that statistically impossible."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I estimated that somewhere between 8090% were going to Joe Biden. Throughout the day, it kept making me sicker and sicker. Every time I saw another Biden, Biden, Biden, and then I'm going through batches. Batches, 100% of the batches were Biden. I find that statistically impossible.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official overseeing Western Hemisphere aid, confirms Latin Americans are leftists and that Democrats aim to create one-party rule to overturn the Constitutional Republic. He claims USAID has spent over $4 billion in four years and supports the “Great Replacement Theory,” arguing the policy changes U.S. demographics. He says Mexicans should stay home while others come here, and that the Mexican government profits from remittances.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And this is: Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign aid and bribes across the Western Hemisphere: CONFIRMS: “Latin Americans are all leftists.” What Democrats want is to create a one-party rule—and ultimately overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States: Despite USAID pouring over $4 billion into programs over four years, the “Great Replacement Theory” is real — the deliberate importation and protection of illegals is intended to fundamentally alter—and ultimately destroy—America as we know it. — The State Department official affirmed: “Oh, yeah. So all the good, honest, hardworking Mexicans stay in Mexico, and all the pieces of garbage come to the United States… And the Mexican government has no reason to stop it because their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to them.” — When asked about the ultimate goal behind such policies, the official responded: “They want to change the demographics of the United States… Traditional, standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans are all leftists. It literally is. It’s just— it literally is essential to try to change the demographics in the United States.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1: Mentions there are many things she wishes people knew, but mostly with the administration she wishes people knew that “we're letting in criminals daily.”
Speaker 2: States the big issue for the region is migration, noting “we poured a lot of money into Central America,” amounting to “4,000,000,000 over four years,” but migrants are now coming from elsewhere, including Venezuela.
Speaker 3: Asks, “So what is the end goal?”
Speaker 1: Asks why aren’t they allowing children, noting “a lot of children travel to The United States, David.”
Speaker 2: Explains aid goes to female presence in Mexico, training women, and mentions working with gender issues in Pakistan, aiming to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. Asks whether US taxpayers’ money should be spent in “our country on this issue,” implying women may not care about certain aspects.
Speaker 2: Asks how close Secretary Lincoln is to him, “five degrees separation,” and notes migration is a niche industry that flies under the radar; the average American doesn’t know what they do.
Speaker 1: Thanks the chairman, ranking member, and members for the opportunity to testify.
Speaker 2: Mentions upcoming briefings in two weeks on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill.
Speaker 0: States migration is the big issue for the Hill and asks, “Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?”
Speaker 1: Responds that he’s not accountable for that and says, “We do stuff,” referencing the root causes strategy, which is about giving money to support and help people at the origins of migrants so they feel they can stay there instead of migrating. It’s “Central America, basically.” He says they poured a lot of money into Central America, and again mentions “4,000,000,000 over four years.”
Speaker 2: Asks if it’s doing anything; response: yes, for them, but migrants are now coming from elsewhere like Venezuela, and acknowledges that outcome looks bad for the administration and for politics in general.
Speaker 3: Seeks the end goal and asks again why there’s a limit on who’s allowed in.
Speaker 1: Cites changes in demographics in the United States; notes that Nebraskans are traditional Americans not leftists, while Latin Americans are described as leftists, framing it as a system to try to change demographics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's gotta be something that you're like, man, I wish I could tell tell the world
Speaker 1: about this. Oh, there's a lot of things. But mostly mostly went to the administration. I wish people knew that we're letting in criminals daily.
Speaker 2: The big issue for the the hell for our region is migration. So we poured a lot of money into Central America. Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years, but now migrants are coming from elsewhere. Nice.
Like Venezuela.
Speaker 3: So what is the end goal?
Speaker 1: Why aren't they allowing children? A lot of children travel to The United States, David.
Speaker 2: So our aid goes to female presence in Mexico. Some of them. Yeah. Yeah. To, like, help train them up.
Speaker 1: Working with gender issues and Pakistan. So we're trying to recruit retain and advance more women in law enforcement. This question becomes do we should we be spending US taxpayers money in our country on this issue? Women simply don't seem to care about.
Speaker 2: Secretary Lincoln, how close are you to him? Five degrees separation. This is such a niche industry that flies under the radar. You have the average American version of her.
Speaker 1: Most people don't know what we do. Mister chairman, thank you very much to you, ranking member Rish, all the members of the committee, and thank you for the opportunity to testify today.
Speaker 2: He has briefings coming up in two weeks. He has briefings? Yeah. On the hill. About the f y twenty twenty five budget request.
And that's, like, with all the congressional people. Big issue for the the hill for our region is migration. Oh my. Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?
Speaker 1: He's not accountable
Speaker 2: for that, is he? Yeah. We do stuff for it. Oh, do you? I do.
Oh. I didn't realize that. It's called the root causes strategy. Oh. How's It's giving money to support and help people at where they the origins of the migrants are so they feel like they can stay there instead of migrating out.
So it's Central America, basically. It's what? It's basically Central America. Like Right. Support and development.
So we poured a lot of money into Central America. Like, how much? 4,000,000,000 over four years. Oh. It's like a lot of money for those places.
That's a lot of money. Is it doing anything? I think for them, yes. But now migrants are coming from elsewhere. Nice.
Like Venezuela. So we're like, oh, this would solve that problem. No. No. So what did you say to that?
That looks bad for the administration, doesn't it? Yeah. Oh, it looks bad for any administration. Because no one sells my group. Like the end all be all, like, pill pill for politics.
Right. And I feel like I feel like if anything, the other side is gonna win because of it. I know. My dad used to complain about that. I'm like, oh, and, like, in my mind, I'm like, oh, that's not that much.
And then I see the chart, I'm like, oh, that's a lot. That's Like, compared to, like, twenty years ago. I'm like, oh, wait. They're on to something. And I don't know what to say to that.
I I really don't. I literally don't know. Like, what what would the administration say to that? I don't know. And, like, I sit there too.
I'm and I talk with my coworker who, like, manages the migration process, foreign assistance. And I we always talk every time. Like, I don't know what we do. Like Right. There's no clear answer.
Speaker 0: Do they do do they do things within the foreign affairs department said that will have, like, this money going to the limit. I mean, there's gotta be some things that you're like, man, I wish I could tell tell the world about this.
Speaker 1: Oh, there's a lot of things. But mostly mostly with immigration immigration because that's the one that we're the left is really good for immigration. I wish people knew that we're letting in criminals daily. Like, when I was in You have confirmation of that? What?
You have confirmation of that? Oh, yeah. So they so all the good, honest, hardworking Mexicans stay in Mexico and all the pieces of garbage to The United States, and those are the ones that we want. We are literally and the Mexican government has no reason to stop it because these their their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to it. Imagine if the worst are the worst.
If all the criminals in The United States were all in Canada, sending back billions of dollars a year. I would just stop that. I wouldn't even change the numbers of like, if we let in a 100,000 Mexicans a year, I'm like, let in a 100,000 Mexicans a year. Let's just change the quality of the applicant. Like, you know, say a 100,000 Mexicans, but you can't have them in The US illegally.
You can't have a criminal record.
Speaker 3: So what is the end goal? Why aren't they allowing it?
Speaker 1: True. There's a lot of changes in demographics in The United States. They're really good. Because, I mean, on no. Honestly, the the people from Nebraska, like, by the time they say, like, Americans that have, my family's been the best for forty years, traditional standard Americans are not leftists.
Latin Americans all are leftists. And it's just it literally is a system just to try try to change it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Brian Cole, the Jan. 6 pipe bomber, was a Trump-hating white thug tied to Antifa, and that Christopher Wray deliberately covered it up. I accuse Antifa of being Trump-hating domestic terrorists who blended in during the early hours of Jan. 6 to interrupt Congress and certify the overthrow of the government at Democrats’ urging. I say Wray outdoes Comey, Brennan, and Schiff.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Well, here it is: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: The Jan. 6 pipe bomber Brian Cole was a Trump-hating white thug with ties to Antifa — and Christopher Wray deliberately covered it up. Here are also the Trump-hating thugs — Antifa — on Jan. 6, a domestic terror organization, blending in during the early morning hours of January 6 to interrupt the official proceedings of the U.S. Congress, certifying the overthrow of the U.S. government at the behest of Democrat members of Congress. Antifa: “I know you can’t stomach wearing it. But, like, you need to blend in.” “What do you think I should wear?” 📝Christopher Wray has truly outdone James Comey, John Brennan, and Adam Schiff combined.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker is getting his disguise ready and considering what to wear, including wearing a mask under another mask and choosing a hat. The other urges blending in and having a visual identifier, insisting, “you gotta blend in,” and adds, “you can't you have to have a visual identif ier.” They debate whether to wear this mask or that hat, with the America hat being a possible move, and say they will bring both in a backpack. They mention bringing boxers and note CNN, signaling readiness.
The first speaker wonders aloud about committing crimes, saying, “I work I don't know if we're committing crimes doing this,” while the second questions whether the first speaker thinks they don’t work for all three companies simultaneously, saying, “Are you insinuating that I don't work for all of them.” The second asserts that trust requires a visual cue, “There’s something visual,” and the first confirms they won’t be allowed to proceed without a visual identifier. The exchange centers on blending in, possessing a visual identifier, and the logistical details of their disguises (hats, masks) and preparations (backpack, boxers).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's getting his disguise on.
Speaker 1: Okay. So he's gonna wear this. I'm gonna wear a mask underneath the mask. You should wear this. I'm wondering if
Speaker 0: I should wear what do you think I should wear as a hat? Should wear this or this? Yeah. Here, this is your mask. Oh my god.
The America mask. Dude, dude, dude, I'm not I'm not fucking
Speaker 1: with you. You're you gotta blend in. I know you can't stomach wearing it, but, like, you need to blend in. You can't you have to have a visual ident ifier. Mhmm.
I I'm not you're not coming if you're not wearing this. Alright. You you could also wear this if
Speaker 0: Yeah. The the America hat might be my move, but we'll see. We'll keep well, I'll bring them both in my backpack. We've got boxers. Oh, yeah.
CNN. We're ready to We're ready. I work I don't know if we're committing crimes doing this, but you know, like, we're
Speaker 1: Are you insinuating that I don't work for all three of these companies simultaneously? I am
Speaker 0: at least a little insinuating that.
Speaker 1: You feel like you think that I don't work for all of them. They they won't trust you unless there's a visual like, there's something visual.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Brian Cole junior, a 30-year-old white man from the DC suburbs, is charged with transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by means of explosion. CNN observed local and federal law enforcement outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Capital attack. Brian Cole junior, a 30 year old white man from the DC suburbs, is charged with transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by means of explosion. CNN observed local and federal law enforcement outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Capital attack." The report identifies Brian Cole junior, described as a 30-year-old white man from the DC suburbs, as the individual associated with the incident under discussion. He is charged with transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by means of explosion.
CNN’s account notes that local and federal law enforcement were observed outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia, during the morning hours of the report. The description provides a geographic detail linking the individual to a residence in Woodbridge, Virginia, and specifies the immediate presence of law enforcement personnel at that location as part of the unfolding coverage.
The two charges attributed to Brian Cole junior are explicit: first, transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce; second, malicious destruction by means of explosion. The statement connects these charges directly to Cole junior, identifying him in relation to the alleged offenses and the context in which the incident has attracted law enforcement attention.
The timeline indicated by the reporting places these events in a recent morning, with observations of law enforcement activity at the subject’s home. The description emphasizes the observed police presence as part of the reporting, signaling ongoing investigative or procedural steps following the charges.
In summary, the provided material identifies a specific individual, Brian Cole junior, with a stated age and demographic background, as the person charged with two particular offenses related to explosive materials and destruction. The geographic association to Woodbridge, Virginia, and the noted involvement of local and federal law enforcement at his residence are highlighted elements of the report. The account is framed around the charges of transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce and malicious destruction by means of explosion, as reported by CNN in connection with the described morning presence of law enforcement at the home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Capital attack. Brian Cole junior, a 30 year old white man from the DC suburbs, is charged with transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by means of explosion. CNN observed local and federal law enforcement outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report sources claim Gina Haspel, Pompeo, Barr, Durham, and Bolton withheld exculpatory evidence before the 2020 election, allegedly aiding the overthrow of the U.S. government. A senior CIA officer with SCI clearance says this was caught on hidden camera. They allegedly withheld intelligence from Trump, and Pompeo allegedly granted Schiff access to raw logs in Langley in 2017–2018 to overturn Trump.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: 🚨🚨 CONFIRMED: Sources say Brennan CIA protégé Gina Haspel, along with Mike Pompeo, William f**king Barr, John Durham, and John Bolton, withheld exculpatory evidence in OBAMA’s Russia Conspiracy Hoax right before the 2020 election. Meaning: By obscuring exculpatory evidence, they facilitated the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. — A senior CIA intelligence officer, with 10 years of service and top-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) clearance, caught on hidden camera. — The CIA, including Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, deliberately withheld intelligence from the sitting President of the United States, @realDonaldTrump, during his first administration. 📝By the way: It was CIA Director Mike Pompeo, in late 2017 who covertly granted Adam Schiff access to raw intelligence logs and intelligence communications right out of a small room in Langley for Schiff to use in an attempt to overthrow @realDonaldTrump the sitting President of the United States. 📝By the way: It was CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who covertly granted Adam Schiff in 2018 access to raw intelligence logs and intelligence communications right out of a small room in Langley for Schiff to use in an attempt to overthrow @realDonaldTrump the sitting President of the United States. @paulsperry_ @CIADirector @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on Amjed Fassisi, a CIA contractor who works with Deloitte and, at times, within the CIA’s China Mission Center on cyber operations. He describes a career path that includes time at the CIA starting in 2008, a stint at the NSA for two years, then a return to the CIA in 2011, where he managed about 80 cybersecurity practitioners and later helped stand up a threat program inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Fassisi asserts that he holds a high-level clearance (top secret/SCIs) and that his role involves cross-agency work across the enterprise, though he does not disclose specific details.
Key, repeated claims attributed to Fassisi:
- The higher-ups in the intelligence community, including CIA directors Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, and the upper echelons of their staffs, colluded to withhold information from sitting President Donald Trump. Fassisi states, “We kept information from him,” and later explains “the executive staff” (the director and subordinates) were involved.
- Fassisi contends that the CIA and other agencies monitored Trump and his inner circle, using human sources and surveillance. He mentions that Trump could be targeted or spied on, including claims that he would “call Vladimir Putin and tell him” secrets, and that “the intelligence agencies thought that president Trump was a, quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information.”
- He asserts that information about Trump’s activities was intentionally withheld from him by the intelligence community, and that this withholding involved high-level officials who would not share details with the president.
- Fassisi suggests that the intelligence community engaged in surveillance of Trump and his team using methods such as human intelligence rather than only wiretaps, and that the FBI, NSA, and other agencies were involved, with implications that FISA-related processes were used to monitor Trump.
- He asserts distrust and lack of information-sharing among agencies, stating “the NSA and CIA don’t share information” and describing internal fragmentation and territoriality between agencies as a problem.
- Fassisi alleges that there was a broader pattern of weaponizing the CIA and collaborating with foreign partners to influence or monitor Trump associates, referencing the broader narrative around Trump and Russia and implying ongoing monitoring of Trump’s activities post-presidency as well.
- He makes broad allegations about Israel and other allies, asserting distrust and claiming Israel “steals intelligence” from the U.S.; he frames relations with allies as fraught and unreliable.
- Fassisi describes the reporting by Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi as validated by his claims, and positions the ongoing investigation as exposing corruption within the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice, with a narrative that information was hidden from the public and from Trump.
Supporting context around the interview:
- The exchange includes tense moments where Fassisi is shown a CIA badge and discusses his role; the interviewer questions the plausibility and provenance of his claims, pressing for documentation or proof, while Fassisi provides limited responses about his clearance, division (China Mission Center), and contractor status.
- The segment also includes editorial framing by the presenter, interjecting with external commentary and promotional content not directly related to Fassisi’s assertions. The interviewer promises follow-up coverage and frames Fassisi’s statements as part of a broader whistleblower narrative.
- Throughout, the content repeatedly emphasizes claims of withheld information from Trump, surveillance of Trump and his associates, inter-agency distrust, and internal CIA culture, without providing verifiable documentation within the interview itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I work in the Public East community. I work in the CIR. I've in cyber operations.
Speaker 1: I've been doing it for a while. So how
Speaker 2: long have you been working at the CIA?
Speaker 0: Since 2008. I've also worked at MSA.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And
Speaker 0: then I had a TSSCI with a full score polygraph. That means that I'm fully vetted.
Speaker 3: Amjad Fassisi shows her his CIA identification badge.
Speaker 2: No. Where does it say
Speaker 0: It doesn't.
Speaker 2: Hey. That's the point.
Speaker 4: That's the point.
Speaker 2: What's CMC?
Speaker 0: China Emissions Center. They are really China Emissions Center.
Speaker 3: Gotcha. Amjad talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump.
Speaker 0: Like working. We kept we kept information from him. Say one more time? We kept information from him.
Speaker 2: From Trump? Yes.
Speaker 0: He's an idiot. And there are certain people that would give him a high level of review, but never do what you need to do. Know why? It's called leak to those people.
Speaker 3: I'm John Fassisi states a higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump.
Speaker 2: So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups.
Speaker 0: The higher ups. We we put it this way. The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates.
Speaker 2: Like, what titles are they? They're
Speaker 5: Director of the CIA.
Speaker 2: Director of the CIA will keep
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 2: Are you guys still watching him? I would say yes. It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team.
Speaker 0: Of course
Speaker 6: of course we are.
Speaker 0: Nothing goes without somebody watching.
Speaker 3: Amjed Fassisi also states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife.
Speaker 0: And we also have people that monitor and say that's a lot of people.
Speaker 2: So you guys had human sources.
Speaker 0: How do you think we got it from
Speaker 2: Like wiretapping? Is that How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use
Speaker 0: So it's just human intelligence.
Speaker 2: So the intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Correct. Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? So it
Speaker 0: should be all over.
Speaker 2: So you're you're saying that we you your agency Yep. Oh, a lot of
Speaker 0: the agencies forget. He's not
Speaker 7: gonna get it. I'll be elected again.
Speaker 0: I've I've done the math. That's impossible.
Speaker 8: We have a choice here to win that, like,
Speaker 0: democracy or to do some fucking madman. Yeah.
Speaker 9: Must be a big creator. Does
Speaker 2: it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? No.
Speaker 9: No. No.
Speaker 0: We can't do that. And then I worked at NSA for two year for a year.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 10: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff,
Speaker 0: which I cannot tell you about. They're the office of director of national intelligence. So I help them stand up inside our program.
Speaker 3: I'm James Zockey reporting on location outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Right behind me, the CIA, the police officers here.
Speaker 0: We figured we'd come up and just say hello.
Speaker 3: No problem. We're we're allowed to stand
Speaker 0: here? A 100%.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. Absolutely. Everything you guys are doing is a 100% okay from where you're at right now.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 0: If we proceed forward of the crosswalk Yeah. That's where we may have to come up and have another discussion.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We're gonna stand right on the sidewalk. Percent. Absolutely. I it.
Alright. Alright. Very good. Thanks a Thank you. Just a moment ago, officers coming out from Langley, Virginia to warn me not to set foot across that line right there.
It's obviously dangerous for us to be here. It's dangerous for us to do this reporting. But thanks to a brave OMG undercover swiper, we present to you the O'Keeffe Media Group blockbuster investigation inside the CIA. A few months ago, journalists Matt Taibi and Michael Schellenberger released a story making several claims, including the CIA illegally mobilizing foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers before the twenty sixteen election. Barack Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, identified 26 Trump associates for the intelligence community to target and bump, make contact with or manipulate.
And what bumping means is literally bumping into people, making contact with them, communicating with them, and spreading misinformation to divert their attention. The US intelligence community also asked its foreign allies, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, and the Israeli Mossad to target these 26 members of Trump's team going all the way back to March 2016, well before the twenty sixteen presidential election. Multiple instances that The US intelligence officials likely broke laws against spying and election interference. Former CIA director Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that included evidence that may have identified her role in the Trump Russia collusion hoax. This activity was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a foreign intelligence surveillance act, that's FISA warrant, and because the weaponization of the intelligence community for political purposes constitutes election interference.
The first of the intelligence community surveillance targets appeared to be a former defense intelligence agency, that's DIA head, and would be Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 243 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the twenty sixteen election. However, sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee led by Adam Schiff covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley, and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council. You're probably wondering how did the CIA respond to this?
Well, former CIA director John Brennan under Barack Obama did not respond nor did the justice department. The US FBI and UK's equivalent to the NSA, that's the GCHQ, however, responded that wiretapping the president-elect claims were nonsense. They were utterly ridiculous and should be ignored. What's most interesting about that is Taibi and Schellenberger didn't even ask about wiretapping. The FBI and GCHQ just included it in their response.
Even more interesting is how did the mainstream media report it? The mainstream narrative was that the UK government GCHQ, again, that's The United Kingdom's NSA equivalent, was the whistleblower in the investigation into the alleged ties between Trump and the Russian government and other narratives that have all turned out to be false. As it turns out, not only was Taibi and Schellenberger's reporting accurate, we can now provide proof on camera. Thanks to one of our OMG undercover American swiper citizen investigative journalists. Using the dating app Bumble and hidden cameras, our OMG journalists set up a series of meetings and phone calls with Amjed Fassisi, a CIA contractor with top level government security clearances.
Now as it turns out, the corruption at the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice is probably even worse than you thought, and now you can see it with your own eyes. We're reporting that Amjed Fassisi, a senior intelligence officer with a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, has worked at the CIA for over a decade, and his knowledge and his position in access show he has a high level awareness about the agency, its current culture, and how it has been corrupted by bureaucratic politics, and how it has over the years and continues to use its powers to weaponize the CIA to spy on president Trump. Let's meet Amjad Fassisi. Amjad Fassisi is a CIA contractor working with Deloitte. He has a high level top secret government security clearance and works within the CIA and its China Mission Center on cyber operations.
According to the CIA's website, the China Mission Center was formed to address the global challenge posed by the People's Republic Of China that cuts across all of the CIA's mission areas. Through his work over the years with the CIA, NSA, and various defense contractors, Amjed Vasisi is well connected to high level government officials. What you're about to see in this video is truly incredible. Amjed Vasisi divulges on camera that the directors of the CIA, including Gina Haskell and Mike Pompeo, and other high ranking members of the intelligence community, purposely colluded to withhold information from Donald Trump, then the sitting president of The United States. I greenlit the hidden camera date as we were initially under the impression that he was working for defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
But during the first meeting, our American swiper noticed that Vassisi was in fact CIA, at which point our undercover investigation took on a whole new angle. Our brave American swiper citizen journalist cultivated a rapport with Vassisi, and from there, the rest is history. What
Speaker 2: wait. What do you
Speaker 0: I work for the CIA.
Speaker 2: You work for the CIA? That's hard to put that. What do you do for them?
Speaker 0: I've been to cyber appellate,
Speaker 1: but I've been doing it for a while.
Speaker 2: How long have you worked there?
Speaker 0: Oh god. With so I work for Deloitte. Deloitte Consulting. Okay. So I'm a contractor to the CIA.
Deloitte's my base out of the CIA. Okay. I also worked at MSA. Deloitte. Deloitte.
I I work in a mission center at the agency. I am a program manager, political program manager company. I help the mission center across all the across the entire enterprise, everything.
Speaker 3: After telling our undercover American swiper citizen journal his role with the CIA, Amjad Fassisi shows her his CIA identification badge.
Speaker 0: Alright. So here you go.
Speaker 2: Okay. Let me see.
Speaker 0: You start. You should be discreet around, please.
Speaker 2: Oh, I'm sorry. How long have
Speaker 0: you worked for? So that was so that's 2008. So that was the last picture update was from 2013.
Speaker 2: This is from 2013, which is more than a decade ago. No. Wait. Hold on. Where does it say this?
It doesn't. Why is that?
Speaker 9: It does. Why would why would
Speaker 0: it But
Speaker 2: how do people know
Speaker 3: oh, wait.
Speaker 2: I I guess. That's the point. Right? That's the point.
Speaker 4: That's the point.
Speaker 0: Let me see.
Speaker 2: Is there like a
Speaker 0: This is United States seal.
Speaker 2: It's the CIA seal?
Speaker 0: No. It's The United States seal.
Speaker 2: Oh, but there's no it's not like a CIA seal?
Speaker 0: No. We we cannot do that. What's CMC? China Mission Center, darling. Oh.
You wanna do okay. I'm getting a little nervous now. Okay.
Speaker 2: This is oh, so this is the agent your your your division.
Speaker 0: That's my mission center.
Speaker 2: Gotcha. Gotcha.
Speaker 0: But do you believe me now?
Speaker 2: Yes. This is very legit. I like it. I got it.
Speaker 0: Because we have to go through training where, like, we leave a very low carbon cyber or Internet or social media footprint. Uh-huh. I'm on LinkedIn.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 0: I'm on Facebook. My real name Uh-huh. And the company I work for, that's it.
Speaker 2: Do you does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn?
Speaker 9: No. No. No. We can't do that.
Speaker 0: No. No. No.
Speaker 1: They don't
Speaker 2: they don't allow you guys
Speaker 0: to do that? Oh, so no.
Speaker 3: Omjed Vasisi also describes how you obtain top secret clearance called TSSCI. TSSCI is a subset of top secret clearance and is required for access to highly sensitive information known as sensitive compartmented information, SCI. SCI is classified information concerning intelligence sources, methods, and other sensitive matters.
Speaker 0: And then I had a TS SEI with a full scope polygraph. I put TS SEI full scope, and that means that I'm fully vetted.
Speaker 2: So how long have you been working at the CIA?
Speaker 0: 2008.
Speaker 2: Back when you were Lockheed.
Speaker 0: Correct. And then and then I worked at NSA for two year for a
Speaker 2: year. Okay.
Speaker 10: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff,
Speaker 0: which I can not tell you about. And then I went back to the CIA in 2011. I went to the north of Grumman right down
Speaker 2: the street. Okay.
Speaker 0: Managed 80 cybersecurity practitioners. And then I went to the office of director of national intelligence. So I helped them stand there inside our threat program. They trusted me to to set that up.
Speaker 2: Yeah. What exactly is inside the threat programs?
Speaker 9: It's it's usually, the the biggest thing with insider threat is if somebody clicks on a link that they're not supposed to or whatever and then they infect their entire network. So does that make any sense? So so the the biggest threat of all is is the carelessness of people within your organization. So you put rules, governance rules, know, things that they have to follow so that they don't do anything stupid.
Speaker 3: Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic.
Our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with eight potentially lifesaving prescription only medications, including Z Pak and ivermectin, which I use myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a Wellness Company medical emergency kit. The Wellness Company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now save $45 per kit when you order using the code OMG. Get ready to write this down.
Get your wellness company medical emergency kit at twc.health/omg. That's twc.health/omg. That's twc.health/omg and save $45 per kit today when you use code OMG. Amjad Fassisi states as fact that the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump.
Speaker 2: You said that Mhmm. He was one way if Mike Pompeo was working with the heads of the others intel agencies.
Speaker 0: Mike Pompeo was a Northrop, DC.
Speaker 2: Right. And he was working with the heads of the other intel agencies to to withhold information from Trump.
Speaker 0: His predecessor, Gina Haskell, did.
Speaker 2: So Gina was the one who withheld information from Trump?
Speaker 0: And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same
Speaker 7: thing too.
Speaker 2: Mike Pompeo did the
Speaker 9: same thing?
Speaker 0: I believe
Speaker 3: so. Amjad Vassisi states his fact that Trump would call Putin and tell him secret intelligence information.
Speaker 0: He would give it away. Yeah. He'd call Vladimir Putin and tell him, it's ever done. No. I'm being serious.
You have me Yeah. I'm sorry to give you a simplistic answer,
Speaker 2: but he's a fucking man. So you think Gina and Mike Pompeo worked with the heads of the FBI?
Speaker 0: Believe so. I mean
Speaker 2: To withhold information from Trump.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So
Speaker 2: the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. The higher ups.
Speaker 0: Let me put it this way. The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates.
Speaker 2: Okay. And he's serving
Speaker 0: And these are very smart people.
Speaker 2: Like, what titles are they?
Speaker 0: They're
Speaker 5: Director of the CIA.
Speaker 2: Director of the CIA will
Speaker 3: states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. We are assuming Amjed is speaking of Marla Maples.
Speaker 2: How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use
Speaker 0: to to even intelligence. I don't I I'm not I I can't give you a certain answer. I don't have a but we have we have we have too many public issues, and we also have people that monitor his ex wife. He likes to use burner phones.
Speaker 2: Can I say that one
Speaker 0: more time?
Speaker 2: I'm he likes to use what?
Speaker 0: Burner phones. Burner phones.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 0: That means a prepaid phone card that's not a tax deed. It's not on the network. It doesn't ping the
Speaker 2: Like a dummy phone? Like a dumb cell? Like a flip phone?
Speaker 0: That's a phone number.
Speaker 3: I've had it with all my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining my friend, Eric Prince, and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. Protect your privacy. Get your very own unplugged phone. Go to unplugged.com/omg.
That's unplugged.com/omg. Take your privacy back. Unplugged.com/omg.
Speaker 2: Was the intel community able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team? I don't know. But
Speaker 0: they did a thorough investigation. The the outcome of that is in the mother report.
Speaker 2: Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump?
Speaker 0: So it should be all over.
Speaker 2: So you guys had human sources. Like wiretapping? Is that what Okay.
Speaker 0: Just like that.
Speaker 2: So, like
Speaker 3: As though there is not already enough controversy around Israel, Amjad Fassisi, again, a high level government contractor states he doesn't trust Israel and they, quote, steal intelligence from us.
Speaker 2: Like like So for example,
Speaker 0: who's written? Our our ally.
Speaker 2: Who? Israel. Okay. Israel,
Speaker 0: our ally.
Speaker 2: Uh-huh. I
Speaker 0: don't trust them. You know, are they? They still ship from us.
Speaker 2: Like,
Speaker 0: Information. So do we, Battleford. Why do you ship from us?
Speaker 2: Like, what kind of information? Like, weapons or
Speaker 0: Weapons. Could be emulates first. Stuff we don't wanna kill.
Speaker 2: So they're not really our friends?
Speaker 0: Nobody's really thrilled about Russia. This side is Nobody.
Speaker 2: So the intel community was able to use FISA to spy on Trump and his team, and that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Correct.
Speaker 3: And as any good spy would do, Vasisi makes it clear that, quote, this conversation didn't happen.
Speaker 0: This topic didn't happen. I Of course. I distinctly deny it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So badass. Are you guys still watching him?
Speaker 0: I would say yes.
Speaker 2: It's just the intel community is still monitoring him and spying on him. We we
Speaker 0: I'm not sure I would
Speaker 2: And it sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team.
Speaker 0: Of course
Speaker 6: of course, we are. Nothing goes
Speaker 0: by without somebody watching.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's just rested short. I promise.
Speaker 3: Amjad Vasisi, a program manager contracted at the CIA, talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Amjad also discloses that the directors of the CIA would give Trump high level overviews, but never give him any details. Vassisi also spills that all the intelligence agencies thought that president Trump was a, quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information, unquote. When asked how do you keep information from president Trump, our subject says, quote, don't give it to him.
Speaker 0: Like working. We kept information from him because we knew he fucking disclosed it.
Speaker 2: Say that
Speaker 0: one more time. We kept information from him.
Speaker 2: From Trump? Do we have proof for that?
Speaker 0: No. But we all believe because he's the biggest fucking idiot.
Speaker 2: So you're you're saying that we you your agency CIA
Speaker 0: A lot of the agencies. But
Speaker 2: kept information away. Not
Speaker 0: yes. Because we knew that we we'd be careless with. Yeah. Like store has been a pack showers or walking. Is that how it's like?
Speaker 2: So you guys would on purpose keep certain information away from Trump.
Speaker 0: He said he said said absolutely very easy. He other than any videos. No idea.
Speaker 2: So the generals or like Every everybody. Yeah. They would just not share anything with him.
Speaker 0: We all did. We all thought he was fucking cheap dumbass.
Speaker 2: Who's weak?
Speaker 0: All the anti intelligence agents.
Speaker 3: In full on bureaucratic elitist fashion, Amjed Fassisi describes the only people in the CIA that support Trump are rednecks that live in the sticks and brainwashed stupid idiots.
Speaker 0: Yeah. There are some people that do a good button inside. Like who?
Speaker 2: Are you kidding me?
Speaker 0: Rednecks who live out and then they go up there wearing the sticks.
Speaker 2: Like, how would you describe those people who still support Trump? These like, after what happened
Speaker 0: on Trump? Ringwashed? Ringwashed, stupid, illiterate.
Speaker 3: Aumjed Fassisi with the CIA states there is, quote, no way Trump will get elected again.
Speaker 0: He's not
Speaker 7: gonna get it. I'll be elected again.
Speaker 0: I've I've done the match. I've done the pass. Yeah. But there are more or less than there are though.
Speaker 8: We have a choice here to win that out
Speaker 0: democracy or to win some fucking madman who wants
Speaker 9: to be a dictator.
Speaker 3: Omjent Vasisi states as fact that the NSA, CIA, and other departments within the intel community don't trust each other, therefore, don't share information. Does the
Speaker 2: CIA work with the NSA?
Speaker 0: No. Because they're very territorial. Just don't like sharing information. That is our fucking problem. We don't share information called NSA has outed, gotten a lot of achievement, CIA, but now killed.
So the CIA is rare. So what did they share with the NSA?
Speaker 2: The NSA is careless?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Possible violations of the law here include obstruction of justice by deception, conspiracy to obstruct, false statements, that's 18 USC 1,001. The actions of the directors and the executive staff of the CIA might even trigger violations of the espionage act. Some of these trigger felony provisions, other trigger misdemeanors. That depends upon how serious the prosecutor thinks the violation is.
Depends upon what his exact contracting status was, within which federal silo he really was, other specific regulations specific to the agency he worked under, CIA, etcetera, may be triggered, which could include things like insubordination or engaging in misrepresentation. He has no problem divulging all this to a strange woman after a few cocktails, but clammed up when I asked him.
Speaker 0: We had a chance to review your badge, and it this the one that you it says
Speaker 3: you worked for the CIA. And, you know, Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taebe
Speaker 0: did some reporting about the information that was held from Trump
Speaker 3: from Trump. It's actually a crime for the director of the CIA to withhold information from Trump. No.
Speaker 0: I I I have no idea. Every everything that's I didn't condone this to me. I I don't know. I have no intel. I have no knowledge.
Speaker 3: You said that we, quote, keep information from him.
Speaker 0: That. I I I never You didn't say that. I did not.
Speaker 3: Quote, we kept information from Trump.
Speaker 0: He's a fucking idiot, quote unquote. Those are your words. I can I can have a opinion, but I I don't know? Can I talk can I sit down and talk to you some time about this, please? No.
No.
Speaker 3: I think it's important that I get your comment.
Speaker 0: No. It's that's everything is untrue.
Speaker 3: It's untrue?
Speaker 0: I don't know. I don't I have no idea. I how why would I know? Why would you know? Do you do you work do you work at Seattle?
I can't tell you that. Do you work at Deloitte? Yes. Okay. Are you a program manager at Deloitte?
Yes.
Speaker 3: Do you work at the Chinese Mission Center in Langley, Virginia?
Speaker 0: I can't tell you that.
Speaker 3: You can't tell me that. Have you
Speaker 0: told other people that? I can't tell you that either.
Speaker 3: And stay tuned for follow-up, including my conversation and interaction with Amjad Fassisi released soon. The fact that our intelligence agencies withheld high level information to a sitting US president poses more questions than answers. It would be completely illegal for them to do this. It corroborates the reporting done by intrepid investigative reporters Michael Schoenberger and Matt Taibi. But rarely do you get this sort of thing on tape so that everyone can see it.
The American people are being left in the dark because of the agencies, the leadership, the administrative state we have in place are at war and odds with each other. We need more people like this citizen journalist, this brave American swiper. We need more whistleblowers and sources inside these agencies to come forward and really expose what's going on with incontrovertible evidence like documents and video recordings. The time for sitting on the sidelines is over. To quote Edmund Burke, all that is required for the triumph of evil is for good people, that's you, to do nothing.
You can sign up today to become a citizen journalist and American swiper by going to okeefmediagroup.com/swiper. You could donate to us. We have a new five zero one c three nonprofit called Citizen Journalism Foundation. Videos like this are brought to you by Citizen Journalism Foundation. It's fully tax deductible.
Go to citizenjournalismfoundation.com. You could DM us tips at tips.okeefmediagroup.com into our signal number (914) 315-9415. You can DM us on Instagram and x. All this goes far beyond the point of partisan politics. The powers that be ask us to focus on what divides us.
But as I said after I was raided by the FBI, what unites us is so much more powerful than what divides us, and we should all be united that this is wrong. The enemy might be out there, but corruption is alive and well in our country. America, our war is here. To quote Abraham Lincoln, America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter or lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
@paulsperry_ - Paul Sperry
BREAKING: Sources say Brennan CIA protege Gina Haspel, along with Pompeo, Barr, Durham and Bolton, withheld exculpatory evidence in Russiagate Hoax before 2020 election https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/11/20/exclusive_how_trumps_own_appointees_aided_russiagate_plot_against_him_1148719.html
EXCLUSIVE: How Trump’s Own Appointees Aided Russiagate Plot Against Him
When Obama administration officials manufactured U.S. intelligence tying Donald Trump to Moscow following his stunning 2016 victory, they had no idea Trump’s own political appointees w
realclearinvestigations.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Kristi Noem says the Biden–Harris administration awarded Social Security numbers to over nine million illegal aliens, including nine thousand terrorists on the watch list; I ask how this happens and insist Democrats plan to overthrow the Constitutional Republic.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
CONSPIRACY THEORY: NO MORE The United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem: The Biden–Harris terrorist administration awarded over nine million illegal aliens Social Security numbers — including nine thousand terrorists said to be on the terrorist watch list. How does that happen? Because, the Democrats’ plan is to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the administration should ensure Social Security numbers are used for the right purposes and not on benefit programs. He notes that over 6,000 individuals have been identified through their work as being on the terrorist watch list or known criminals, and asks, "How does that happen, madam secretary?" He attributes this to the current presidency, stating, "It happens when you put a train wreck like Joe Biden in the White House, and it's gonna be a lot of work to clean it up."
He presents figures to support his claim about misuse of Social Security numbers. In the last four and a half years, he says, there have been "over 9,000,000 people [who] get Social Security numbers that are not US citizens." He elaborates that these may be people with some sort of legal status, but a lot are illegals who were given a Social Security number in the same period. He asserts a need to determine whether they should be here "legally under a program" and, if they are here illegally, that they "certainly shouldn't be using that Social Security number to be on our programs."
Speaker 0 concludes with a policy preference attributed to President Trump, stating that they should be given "the opportunity to go home on their own" if they wish to. He emphasizes two actions: identifying and addressing improper use of Social Security numbers by non-citizens, including those on the terrorist watch list or otherwise known criminals, and considering removal or voluntary return for those here illegally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's brilliant. He's going to be working to make sure that individuals who got Social Security numbers, in this country should be using them for the right things, and, they shouldn't be on our benefit programs. You know, we have over 6,000 individuals that have been identified through their work already that have been on the terrorist watch list, that they are known criminals. How does that happen, madam secretary? How does that happen?
It happens when you put a train wreck like Joe Biden in the White House, and it's gonna be a lot of work to clean it up. But just in the last four and a half years, we've had over 9,000,000 people get Social Security numbers that are not US citizens. So they may be people who have some sort of legal status, but a lot of them are illegals that were given a Social Security number in just the last four and a half years that we're gonna have to figure out if they should be here, if they are here legally under a program. And if they are here illegally, then they certainly shouldn't be using that Social Security number to be on our programs, and they should be removed or given the opportunity to go home on their own. That's the one thing president Trump would like, is everybody to be given the opportunity to go home if they would wish to.
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe two minutes and nine seconds of alleged conspiracy caught on surveillance: Conspiracy Day — Nov 3–4, 2020 in Detroit. Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson unload thousands of “CCP Bidens” from a City of Detroit minivan, Gretchen Whitbag driving. At 3:53 a.m. and 4:30 a.m. more CCP boxes appear. I compare total votes 2020 vs 2024, asking where 15,202,110 voters went, claiming they overthrew the government with mail-in ballots and that Barr and Wray belong in prison. I wonder about my X timeline.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: Two minutes and nine seconds of alleged conspiracy, caught on surveillance camera: Conspiracy Day — November 3, 2020 Detroit, Michigan — TCF Center, November 4, 2020 Approximately seven hours and twenty-three minutes after polls closed in Michigan, Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson are seen unloading thousands of “CCP Bidens” from a minivan registered to the City of Detroit, with Gretchen “Whitbag” driving. At 3:53 a.m., Gretchen “Whitbag” exits the building—only to return at 4:30 a.m., when Jocelyn Benson and Dana Nessel unload more CCP boxes of “Bidens.” Total votes in 2020: 155,508,985 Total votes in 2024: 140,306,875 Where did 15,202,110 voters go? They overthrew your government with mail-in ballots. And William fucking Barr was in on it. In fact, William Barr and Christopher Wray belong in prison, in one cell, for the rest of their natural lives with no possibility of parole. 📝 Now, what the fuck is happening with my @X timeline? Is Jack Dorsey back?
reSee.it AI Summary
I see that MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, architect of ObamaCare, called the ACA a scam and voters "stupid" on multiple occasions. "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage." I claim the ACA was written to deceive, rob, extort, and blackmail the American public, and that Gruber, Obama, and Roberts are involved—captured on video.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is: The architect of ObamaCare, MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, calling the Unaffordable Care Act a scam and the American voter “stupid” on multiple occasions. “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” The Unaffordable Care Act was written in a way that deliberately and maliciously deceived, robbed, extorted, and blackmailed the American public. In other words: You have been Robbed. Deceived, Blackmailed. Extorted. And Defrauded by Jonathan Gruber, Barack Obama and John Roberts. And all of it captured on video tape.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that politically, you cannot have transparent financing or transparent spending, and that the bill was written in a tortured way to prevent the CBO from scoring the mandate as taxes. If the mandate had been scored as taxes, the bill would die. He says risk-rated subsidies would fail if a law explicitly said healthy people pay in and sick people get money, and that lack of transparency provides a huge political advantage. He suggests that voters’ supposed lack of understanding was exploited to pass the law, calling it “the second best argument” and expressing that, while there are things he wishes could be changed, he would rather have this law than not.
Speaker 1 asks if he stands by the comments in a video and notes they were made at an academic conference; Speaker 0 replies that he was speaking off the cuff. He recounts a Massachusetts bureau, John Perry or staff, proposing a substitute idea: instead of allowing a 40% tax rate for people with expensive plans, limit a 40% tax on the insurance companies that sell those Cadillac plans, which would amount to the same thing. He argues it matters because voters supposedly wouldn’t understand the difference, and the substitutes were pursued for political reasons. He then describes another development by John Kerry in which Kerry proposed taxing those evil insurance companies rather than individuals’ health insurance, with a tax rate aligned to the marginal tax rate under the income tax code. This approach would cause insurers to pass higher prices, offsetting the tax break, resulting in the same outcome as the original plan. He characterizes this as a clever exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.
Speaker 1 concludes with “Speeding off speak,” reflecting that the discussion is moving beyond the initial remarks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Politically. You just literally cannot do it. Okay? Transparent financing unless I have transparent financing, also transparent spending. I mean, the this bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes.
If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay? So it was written to do that. In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said healthy people are gonna pay in, it made explicit that healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed. Okay?
Just like the people, transparent, lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, you know, call it the stupidity the American voter or whatever. But basically that was really, really critical to get anything to pass. And you know, it's the second best argument. Look, wish Mark was right, we could make it all transparent, But I'd rather have this law than not.
So it's kind of like his reporter story. You know, yeah, there's things I wish I could change, but I'd rather have this law than not.
Speaker 1: So first of all, you haven't publicly commented on this so far. Do you stand by the comments in that video? The comment in the video were made at an academic conference. I was speeding off speaking off the cuff.
Speaker 0: Then And another Massachusetts bureau, John Perry, or more likely staff, came up with a great substitute idea. They said, look. What you and economics nerds wanna do is you wanna say that for people with expensive health insurance plans, they will no longer get a 40% tax rate. What if we instead just limit a 40% tax on the insurance companies that sell these terrible expensive Cadillac plans? We said, well, that's pretty much the same thing.
But why does it matter? It You'll see. And they were both in a mad past because the American voters are too stupid to understand the difference. So basically
Speaker 1: And so I was speeding off, speaking off the cuff, and I
Speaker 0: Until a second Massachusetts hero arose, John Kerry. And John Kerry said, no. No. No. We're not to tax your health insurance.
We're going to tax those evil insurance companies. We're going to impose a tax that if they sell health insurance, it's too expensive, we're going to tax them. And conveniently, the tax rate will happen to be the marginal tax rate under the income tax code. So basically, it's the same thing. We just tax the insurance companies.
They pass on higher prices. That offsets the tax break we get. It ends up being the same thing. It's a very clever, you know, basic exploitation of the of the of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter. Okay?
Speaker 1: Speeding off speak
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a claim alleging sedition by Barack Obama and every co-conspirator from the White House down. It quotes DNI Gabbard saying Obama ordered the overthrow after 2016 in favor of Hillary Clinton, lists numerous officials and entities, accuses them of manufacturing the “Russian collusion” hoax to topple the government and oust Trump, and cites a coverup by Christopher Wray—Watergate pales beside it.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of Barack Obama——sedition—and every single co-conspirator involved, from the White House down. Director of National Intelligence @DNIGabbard: “Barack Hussein Obama ordered the overthrow of the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton after the 2016 election was over—after the American people said no, we want Donald Trump to be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton.” Barack Hussein Obama: JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES CLAPPER, JAMES COMEY, SUSAN RICE, LORETTA LYNCH, SALLY YATES, LISA MONACO, HILLARY CLINTON, ADAM SCHIFF, ANDREW MCCABE, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, BRUCE OHR, NELLIE OHR, ROBERT MUELLER, ROD ROSENSTEIN, ANDREW WEISSMANN, VALERIE JARRETT, BEN RHODES, JOHN CARLIN, MARY MCCORD, JAMES BAKER, JONATHAN MOFFA, MICHAEL KORTAN, DAVID LAUFMAN, SAMANTHA POWER, JOHN KERRY, DENIS MCDONOUGH, JIM RYBICKI, BILL PRIESTAP, CHRISTOPHER STEELE, RICHARD DEARLOVE, ALEXANDER DOWNER, STEFAN HALPER, JOSEF MIFSUD, SERGEI MILLIAN, SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, CODY SHEARER, TERRY MCAULIFFE, JONATHAN WINER, JOHN PODESTA, HUMA ABEDIN, ANTHONY WEINER, CHERYL MILLS, HEATHER SAMUELSON, JAKE SULLIVAN, ROBBIE MOOK, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, PETER KADZIK, RACHEL BRAND, MATTHEW AXELROD, MARY JACOBY, PREET BHARARA, JOSH CAMPBELL, JENNIFER PALMIERI, SIR ANDREW WOOD, ROBERT HANNIGAN, ALEXANDRA CHALUPA, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, DMITRY ALPEROVICH, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS (including Glenn Simpson), and Perkins Coie (including Marc Elias) and don’t you dare forget about the coverup—Christopher Wray. —all manufactured the “Russian collusion” conspiracy hoax, a years-long seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election and of overthrowing the duly elected president in 2017. Watergate? not even close!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that over the last several weeks they declassified and released documents exposing that President Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the 2016 election. The document alleged that Russia aspired to help President Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton. And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dr. Oz, Administrator for CMS, confirms six Democrat states conspired and extorted the federal government out of $1.3 billion for healthcare for illegal aliens. He says they investigated, found $1.3B inappropriately taken, clawed back $300 million in the past months, signaling awareness. I’m certain Gavin Newsom is one of them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
🚨🚨CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: Dr. Oz, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CONFIRMS that six Democrat states have acknowledged that they have conspired and extorted the federal government out of $1.3 billion for healthcare for illegal aliens. @DrOz: “We decided to investigate it ourselves because I don’t really trust these six states. We’ve already found that $1.3 billion has been inappropriately taken from federal taxpayers in just the past few months. We just clawed back $300 million, which signals that the six states already know. They acknowledge that this is an embarrassing reality.” 📝 I am certain that Gavin Newsom is one of them.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the Biden–Harris administration awarded over nine million illegal aliens Social Security numbers, including nine thousand on the terrorist watch list; I ask how that happened. I say DHS Secretary Kristi Noem: Congress certified a terrorist organization on January 6. I claim 10,000+ with the same SSN voted in Arizona 2020.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
CONSPIRACY THEORY: NO MORE The United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem: The Biden–Harris terrorist administration awarded over nine million illegal aliens Social Security numbers — including nine thousand who were on the terrorist watch list. How does that happen? DHS Secretary Kristi Noem: Congress certified a terrorist organization on January 6. 📝Over 10,000 illegal aliens with the same exact Social Security numbers voted in the Arizona 2020 General Election:
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses safeguards around Social Security numbers and benefits usage, asserting that a capable person will work to ensure individuals with Social Security numbers use them for proper purposes and are not on benefit programs inappropriately. He then states that more than 6,000 individuals have already been identified through their work as being on the terrorist watch list and as known criminals, and he questions how such a situation could occur.
He attributes this situation to political leadership, naming Joe Biden and describing the outcome as a “train wreck” in the White House, adding that it will require substantial effort to clean up. He provides a specific statistic for emphasis: in the last four and a half years, over 9,000,000 people have received Social Security numbers who are not U.S. citizens. He clarifies that these may include people with some form of legal status, but asserts that many are illegals who were issued Social Security numbers within the same period.
From there, he presents a policy stance: those non-citizens, especially those who are here illegally, should not be using Social Security numbers to participate in U.S. programs. He argues they should be removed or given an opportunity to return to their home country on their own, framing this as a position aligned with President Trump’s preferences, specifically that everybody should be given the opportunity to go home if they wish to.
The passage ends with a transition to a question, “Question. As you know, there have been,” indicating an impending line of inquiry related to the preceding points, though the transcript cuts off before the question is presented in full. The overall focus is on identifying misuse and non-citizens receiving Social Security numbers, questioning the administration’s handling of immigration and eligibility, and aligning these concerns with a political stance attributed to Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's brilliant. He's going to be working to make sure that individuals who got Social Security numbers, in this country should be using them for the right things, and, they shouldn't be on our benefit programs. You know, we have over 6,000 individuals that have been identified through their work already that have been on the terrorist watch list, that they are known criminals. How does that happen, madam secretary? How does that happen?
It happens when you put a train wreck like Joe Biden in the White House, and it's gonna be a lot of work to clean it up. But just in the last four and a half years, we've had over 9,000,000 people get Social Security numbers that are not US citizens. So they may be people who have some sort of legal status, but a lot of them are illegals that were given a Social Security number in just the last four and a half years that we're gonna have to figure out if they should be here, if they are here legally under a program. And if they are here illegally, then they certainly shouldn't be using that Social Security number to be on our programs, and they should be removed or given the opportunity to go home on their own. That's the one thing president Trump would like, is everybody to be given the opportunity to go home if they would wish to.
Question. As you know, there have been
reSee.it AI Summary
Twenty years in the making. I report that in DeKalb County, Georgia, Dominion Rigging Systems declared the wrong winner for the May 22, 2024, District 2 primary. A hand recount found the system shorted a candidate by 3,049 of 4,078 votes—1,456 to an opponent and 1,805 uncounted. The board’s earlier recounts matched, but the hand count revealed the error. “Play it again, Sam.” Dominion, renamed Liberty Vote, must be banned.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: Twenty years in the making. The State of Georgia: Dominion Rigging Systems declared the wrong winner for the May 22, 2024, DeKalb County, Georgia, District 2 Commission primary. The election board decided to conduct a hand recount to ensure accurate results. The issue only came to light because a candidate received no votes, not a single one in the precinct where she and her husband lived and voted. When she reported the problem to the DeKalb Election Board, they ordered a machine recount, which produced the same results once again. A subsequent hand count revealed that the voting system had shorted the candidate 3,049 of her actual 4,078 votes—over 74% of her total. The system had given 1,456 of her votes to one opponent and failed to count another 1,805 votes. “Play it again, Sam.” 📝 Dominion Rigging Systems sold and renamed as "Liberty Vote" doesn’t mean shit. Ban, dismantle, eliminate, and excommunicate every single voting machine across America.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On election night and in the days that followed, it appeared that the results from the tabulating machines were not accurate. A decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election. Speaker 1 asks, “Wasn't that the DeKalb County election board attorney? Play it again, Sam.” The line about the hand recount is repeated: “And a decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election.” Speaker 1 responds, “What? Isn't that what I've been saying for twenty years?” The exchange ends with Speaker 0 stating, “Do a hand recount.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On election night in the days following, it appeared that the results that were coming off the tabulating machines were not accurate. A decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election.
Speaker 1: Wasn't that the DeKalb County election board attorney? Play it again, Sam.
Speaker 0: And a decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election.
Speaker 1: What? Isn't that what I've been saying for twenty years?
Speaker 0: Do a hand recount.
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched a video claiming seditious conspiracy in the 2020 election tied to Dominion/Smartmatic. It alleges votes stopped in key battleground states, then spikes favoring Biden, Maduro using similar tech, rebranding to Liberty Vote, 2.7 million Trump votes deleted, 221,000 PA votes switched, 941,000 Trump votes deleted, and 435,000 votes flipped nationwide, ending with calls to imprison several officials.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: One minute and two seconds of seditious conspiracy captured on video tape. RE: DOMINION & SMARTMATIC Election Rigging Systems Cybersecurity Expert — Colonel Phil Waldron: “Here is some of the treachery we uncovered in the 2020 general election were that five key states all stopped counting votes at the same time in these key battleground states. These were all where Dominion machines, ES&S machines, and Smartmatic software were used. So when the vote counting stopped—and this has been noted in other countries as well—President Trump was significantly ahead. When reporting and counting resumed, a massive spike occurred that favored Joe Biden.” Venezuelan communist dictator Nicolás Maduro got away with overthrowing the Venezuelan government using Dominion–Smartmatic systems. Exit polls showed him losing by 35 points. Once in power, he began imprisoning people who refused to accept the election results. Does this sound familiar? ——————— Dominion was just sold and renamed as "Liberty Vote". Re-branding treason doesn't hide the following fact: REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION-SMARTMATIC VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN. In other words: Dominion-Smartmatic systems overthrew the U.S. government on November 3, 2020. 📝By the way: Jocelyn Benson, Dana Nessel and Gov. Gretchen Whitbag belong in a single prison cell for the rest of their natural lives without the possibility of parole.
reSee.it AI Summary
I present three minutes and fifty-five seconds of seditious conspiracy on tape: emails from James Clapper’s assistant show the assessment was created per the president’s direction, and that before the election the IC found Russia posed no threat to Trump. I claim Mueller and 19 co-conspirators were hired to cover for Obama and joined a two-year scheme to overthrow the government, costing taxpayers $40 million.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: Three minutes and fifty-five seconds of seditious conspiracy captured on video tape: @DNIGabbard “Look at the emails that were sent from James Clapper’s assistant out to the intelligence community, communicating that this assessment would be created per the president’s direction. Read the documents for yourself, and then you can see, as you go through the documents, how in the months leading up to the election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to influence or swing the election for Donald Trump.” In other words: Robert Mueller and his 19 co-conspirators were not only hired to cover up for Barack Obama, they also participated in the conspiracy orchestrated by Obama, the architect of this sedition, in an attempt to overthrow the U.S. government—a scheme that lasted two years and cost $40 million through the extortion of the American taxpayer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two years ago, the acting attorney general asked me to serve as special counsel, creating the special counsel's office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign. I have not spoken publicly during the investigation, but I am speaking out now because our investigation is complete, the attorney general has made the report largely public, the office is formally closed, and I am resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life. Beyond a few remarks, the office’s written work should speak for itself.
We begin with interference in the 2016 presidential election. The grand jury, in an indictment, alleged that Russian intelligence officers, part of the Russian military, launched a concerted attack on our political system, using sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and released it through fake online identities and through WikiLeaks, and the releases were designed and timed to interfere with the election and damage a presidential candidate. In a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans to influence an election. These indictments contain allegations, and we are not commenting on the guilt or innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. The indictments and other activities in our report describe efforts to interfere in our political system, and they needed to be investigated and understood, which is among the reasons the Department of Justice established our office. It was also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance; it was critical to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject obstructs an investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of the government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable. Let me say a word about the report.
Speaker 1 asks: The name of that firm was Fusion GPS. Is that correct? On page 103, volume two, when referring to the firm that produced the Steele reporting, the name is Fusion GPS. Speaker 0: I’m not familiar with that. Speaker 1 clarifies: It was Fusion GPS. It produced the opposition research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For being here. Two years ago, the acting attorney general asked me to serve as special counsel, and he created the special counsel's office. The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the twenty sixteen presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign. Now I have not spoken publicly during our investigation.
I'm speaking out today because our investigation is complete. The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. We are formally closing the special counsel's office, and as well, I'm resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life. I'll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office's written work speak for itself.
Let me begin where the appointment order begins, and that is interference in the twenty sixteen presidential election. As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system. The indictment alleges that they use sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.
And at the same time as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an an election. These indictments contain allegations, and we are not commenting on the guilt or the innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. The indictments alleged and the other activities in our report describe efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood, and that is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office.
That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of their government's effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable. Let me say a word about the report.
Speaker 1: The name of that firm was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?
Speaker 0: And you're on page one zero three?
Speaker 1: One zero three. That's correct. Volume two. When you talk about the the firm that produced the steel reporting, the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS.
Speaker 0: Is that correct? I I'm not familiar with with that.
Speaker 1: Well, let me let me just help. It was. It's not it's not a trick question. I mean, it was Fusion GPS. Now Fusion GPS produced the opposition research
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim a secret group overthrew the U.S. government on Nov 3, 2020, financed by Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg bribed Democratic election officials in swing states who allegedly stopped counting. Franklin says all Congressmembers who certified this atrocity belong in prison, with Zuckerberg.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: How a secret group of people were able to overthrow the United States government on November 3, 2020 — financed by Mark Zuckerberg. Mark Zuckerberg bribed Democratic election officials in the swing states — the very same swing states that simultaneously stopped counting. 📝 Franklin: Every single member of Congress who certified this atrocity belongs in prison, along with Mark Zuckerberg.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I want to ask about what if you've changed position on what happened in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Oh, I think it was rigged.
Speaker 0: You think it was rigged?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I know more now than I did then. What you'd have to do is in February 2021, was a Time Magazine article that was published, it was about Mark Zuckerberg investing $500,000,000 in a get out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. And they focused in what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture.
And they went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of states in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it, we will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections. But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it. If you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, that there are, that you've got a, an RV going around and hauling people into the, into the polling places to vote.
When you do that, if, if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back. You most likely would have ended up in prison. I mean, that's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge. $500,000,000 concentrated in Democrat counties for the purpose of getting out the Democrat vote.
Speaker 0: How do you know it was to get the Democrat vote out? Because how does exactly do what are the mechanics of that? Of how it was You
Speaker 1: I have to read the article. And what the article does is it lays it out, and the title is something along the lines of how a secret group of people were able to save the twenty twenty election, meaning how were they able to get Joe Biden elected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I wanna ask about what if you've changed position on what happened in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Oh, I think it was rigged.
Speaker 0: You think it was rigged?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I I I know more now than I did then. What'd you have to do is in February 2021, was a Time Magazine article that was published, it was about Mark Zuckerberg investing $500,000,000 in a get out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. And they focused in what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture.
And they went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of states in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it, we will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections. But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it. If you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, that there are, that, that you've got a, an RV going around and hauling people into the, into the polling places to vote.
When you do that, if, if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back. You most likely would have ended up in prison. I mean, that's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge. $500,000,000 concentrated in Democrat counties for the purpose of getting out the Democrat How
Speaker 0: do you know it was to get the Democrat vote out? Because how does exactly do what are the mechanics of that? Of how it was You
Speaker 1: have to read the article. And what the article does is it lays it out, and the title is something along the lines of how a secret group of people were able to save the twenty twenty election, meaning how were they able to get Joe Biden elected.
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that, nearly ten years on, declassified documents vindicate Trump and his family. Barack Obama allegedly sought to overthrow the Constitutional Republic in 2016 as part of a seditious conspiracy, overthrew it in 2020 to cover it up, and is now caught. I allege Obama privately sowed discord, that intelligence was politicized to justify baseless smears against Trump, and that the Russia hoax was a fraud known to Obama and others, including Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and McCabe.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
This is: The United States Press Secretary, Karoline Claire Leavitt: “Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by the Director of National Intelligence @DNIGabbard the truth has finally come to light—and it vindicates President Trump and his family. Barack Hussein Obama attempted to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States in 2016 as part of a ‘seditious conspiracy,’ overthrew it in 2020 to cover it up—and now he’s been caught.” @PressSec: “While pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, in private Barack Hussein Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, President Trump. The new evidence released by the Director of National Intelligence confirms that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence, which was later used as justification for baseless smears against President Trump—an effort to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetrated on the American people from the very beginning. The worst part is that Obama knew the truth, as did all the other corrupt officials involved in the scam, including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and many others.” ———— HILLARY CLINTON, SUSAN RICE, LORETTA LYNCH, SALLY YATES, LISA MONACO, Adam Schiff, Peter did Lisa, Lisa did Peter, Bruce Whore, Nellie Whore, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissmann, Valerie Jarrett, Ben Rhodes, John Carlin, Mary McCord, James Baker, Jonathan Moffa, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Samantha Power, John Kerry, Denis McDonough, Jim Rybicki, Bill Priestap, Christopher Steele, Richard Dearlove, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper, Josef Mifsud, Sergei Millian, Sidney Blumenthal, Cody Shearer, Terry McAuliffe, Jonathan Winer, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Peter Kadzik, Rachel Brand, Matthew Axelrod, Mary Jacoby, Preet Bharara, Josh Campbell, Jennifer Palmieri, Sir Andrew Wood, Robert Hannigan, Alexandra Chalupa, Michael Sussman, Dimitry Alperovich, and officials from the DNC, Crowdstrike, Fusion-GPS including Glenn Simpson, And Perkins Coie, including Marc Elias, ‘manufactured’ the Russian collusion conspiracy hoax—a seditious conspiracy with the sole intent to topple the United States government during the 2016 presidential election. And Christopher Wray.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unveiled new evidence alleging that former president Barack Obama and top aides in the Obama administration conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The claim is that Obama, publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, privately went to great lengths to sow discord and sabotage his successor. The newly released evidence from the DNI supposedly confirms that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence used to justify baseless smears against President Trump in an effort to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. The speaker asserts that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the beginning, with Obama and others—including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and many others—knowing the truth.
The DNI Gavrid's report is said to corroborate what was already known: there was no collusion or corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax is described as a blatant lie, manufactured by Democrat political operatives, signed off on by Obama, and leaked to the news media to launch a witch hunt against President Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including his son Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some purportedly having their lives destroyed due to the lie. It is claimed that the president’s first two years in office were haunted by this fake distraction, consuming resources, time, and political capital needed to debunk the lies.
Nearly ten years later, the declassification of documents by director Gabbard is said to reveal the truth, vindicating President Trump, his family, and their allies who were smeared with defamatory lies. President Trump is asserted to have been right from the beginning, with justice now appearing to be served. New, damning evidence is described as implicating those who tried to sabotage a duly elected president and caused grave material harm to the republic. The claim is credited to CIA director Ratcliffe and committee chairman Rick Crawford, referencing a newly declassified 2020 report prepared by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which the DNI has declassified, stating that the intel community did not have any direct information that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect President Trump in 2016. It is asserted that Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but, at Obama’s unusual direction, the intel community published implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise to sabotage the incoming president.
The transcript condemns reporters at legacy outlets, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, claiming they were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for perpetuating the hoax. It calls for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who propagated political disinformation in service of the Democratic party and those in the intelligence community who handed out out-of-context and fake intelligence to push a false political narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Other matter over the past few days, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled shocking new evidence that former president Barack Obama and top aids in the Obama administration conspired to subvert president Trump's February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. While publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power in private, former president Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to try to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, president Trump. The new evidence released by the director of national intelligence who is here with me today confirms that the Obama administration manufactured, politicized intelligence, which was later used as a the justification for baseless smears against president Trump in an effort to try to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. The truth is that president Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the very beginning. And the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth, And so did all of the other corrupt officials involved in this scam, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and many others.
Director of National Intelligence Gavrid's report further confirms what we already knew. There was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax was a blatant lie, all ginned up by Democrat political operatives that were signed off on by then president Obama and leaked to the news media to launch a long witch hunt against president Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including his own son, Donald Trump junior, were disgustingly smeared as Russian assets, and some even had their lives destroyed because of this vicious lie. The president's first two years in office had this fake distraction hanging over it and endless resources, time, and political capital were spent having to debunk these lies from the highest levels of our government.
Now, nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by director Gabbard, the truth has finally come to light. And this truth vindicates president Trump, his family, and his many allies and associates who were smeared with defamatory lies. President Trump was right from the beginning about all of this, and we are grateful that justice can be served. Now we have even more damning evidence implicating those who tried to sabotage a duly elected president and did grave material harm to our republic. Thanks to additional important work done by CIA director Ratcliffe, committee chairman Rick Crawford over the past few months, a newly declassified 2020 report prepared by the house permanent select committee on intelligence, which DNI director has declassified, found that the intel community did not have any direct information that Russian president Vladimir Putin want to help wanted to help elect president Trump in 02/2016.
And in fact, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. But at the unusual direction of Barack Obama at the time, the intel community published implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise. Why? To sabotage the incoming president. This is truly one of the greatest political scandals in American history.
And reporters at legacy outlets, some of which are sitting in this room today, like the New York Times and the Washington Post, were ridiculously awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their perpetuation of this hoax. It's well past time for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who receive them. It is not journalism to propagate political disinformation in service of the Democrat party and those in the intelligence community who hand over out of context and fake intelligence to push a false political narrative.
reSee.it AI Summary
I review documents showing four minutes and forty-six seconds of seditious conspiracy. I report that Fulton County DA Fani “Bang Bang” Willis confesses to 212 pages of conspiracy, linking the Jan 6 Committee and Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith to take down the U.S. government before the 2024 election. An extra 170 pages cover her affair with Nathan Wade, who earned more as her “special prosecutor.” Smith is referred to DOJ OPR and state bar panels.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: Documents obtained by @JudicialWatch through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) confirms four minutes and forty-six seconds of seditious conspiracy: 🚨🚨 COURTHOUSE BOMBSHELLS: The disgraced, duplicated Fulton County District Attorney Fani "Bang Bang" Willis confesses to 212 pages of conspiracy. She went from having zero records to 212 pages of records detailing a seditious conspiracy involving Fani Willis, the Jan 6 Committee, and Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith to take down the U.S. government ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Additionally, another 170 pages of records detailing her fuck-affair with her whopping $500,000 special prostitute, Nathan Wade. "Wade made much more money than the other special prosecutors only because Wade was fucking me." 📝Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith has been referred for criminal investigation to the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and to state bar panels in New York and Tennessee.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case.
In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.”
Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated.
The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court.
In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation.
Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Weeks of controversy surrounding allegations that she had an improper romantic relationship with a special prosecutor leading the twenty twenty election case. Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis finally responded with a court filing of her own
Speaker 1: 11 alive investigative reporter Zach Merchant has the document. Zach, what are we learning? What does it say here?
Speaker 2: We do. We have it right here. We got it just a few hours ago. It's more than 170 pages long. The big takeaway DA Fonny Willis admits to having what she called a personal relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but said that should not impact their roles in the case.
In a court filing in January, a defendant in the ongoing twenty twenty election case asked the court to disqualify the DA, accusing her of appointing Wade as a special prosecutor and then financially benefiting from that relationship. But in today's motion, Willis said that is not true. Previous eleven alive reporting revealed that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to fly to San Francisco and Miami. But today, Willis wrote that is not the entire case. She said financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two and all expenses paid for with individual personal funds.
Eleven Alive had also shown an earlier reporting that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case. But in today's filing, Willis wrote that Wade made much more money than the other special prosecutors only because Wade did much more work. Two Atlanta legal experts, Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham took different views on how they predict today's filing will impact the case ahead of a scheduled hearing next month.
Speaker 3: I think that the judge will look at it, and he may, obviously, he may do anything. But if I were to guess, he would say this is not going to rise to you having to disqualify yourself or Nathan Wade, but you guys need to be aware that you're under the hardest microscope ever.
Speaker 4: I do not think this disqualification matter is gonna be resolved, at the hearing on February 15 or anytime soon thereafter. I think this is gonna be a very, very complicated matter.
Speaker 2: That upcoming hearing on February 15 will be the first time these allegations are directly addressed in open court. We, of course, will be there when it happens.
Speaker 0: Alright, so a big development today, Zach, but that wasn't the only development concerning the DA.
Speaker 2: No, it wasn't in a related matter, but not entirely on this exact topic. The US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents and information from DA Willis. According to his letter, we got a copy of earlier today. Jordan is seeking documents relating to the DA's office's use of federal funds after a conservative news outlet published allegations that Willis fired an employee who tried to stop the misuse of federal funds meant for youth gang prevention programs.
Speaker 1: Turn over documents related to her election interference case. She was sued by a conservative nonprofit claiming Willis was ignoring their requests, and the judge agreed. Atlanta news first political reporter Doug Reardon is live outside of the Fulton County Courthouse. And, Doug, these documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Presumably, they are and they were made through the open records request that we have here in Georgia and across the country. Anyone can use it. We use it all the time as journalists. It lets you get your hand, hands on public records and tied to that law, there are some really specific time frames in which officials have to respond and either grant or deny those requests.
The judge said yesterday that Willis just plain ignored those time frames. Fulton County district attorney, Fonny Willis, must turn over documents requested by conservative nonprofit judicial watch. The group wanted Willis's communications with the federal January sixth committee and Trump's DC prosecutor, Jack Smith, as she carried out her own case with Trump at the center.
Speaker 6: It is clear that they did not want to comply or were unable or unwilling to comply, and complying with this law is mandatory. Attorney Josh Schiffer says the Open Records Act
Speaker 5: is meant for transparency and set strict standards for responses.
Speaker 6: The argument from these conservative groups and other groups trying to get information is that Fonny Willis can very easily collect this information, it's all digital, and send it over.
Speaker 5: Judge Robert McBurney agreed, telling Willis she had five days to produce the documents, adding, quote, the court has, in effect, declared that she has violated the Open Records Act.
Speaker 6: Some of those communications are absolutely of public interest. They're not protected by any privilege.
reSee.it AI Summary
I declare Devin Nunes vindicated. Twenty CIA and FBI agents whistleblow that Barack Obama and John Brennan created the Russia hoax, doctored intelligence to overthrow the 2016 president, and locked the report in a CIA vault for nearly a decade. On March 21, 2017 I warned Trump I was being overthrown; March 22 I stood alone, revealing Obama spied on Trump. On April 17 I was forced to resign from the House Intel Committee. Now grant him the Presidential Medal of Freedom—at once.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: Devin Nunez VINDICATED. Twenty CIA and FBI agents have blown the whistle, confirming that Barack Hussein Obama and his Chief of Staff, CIA Director John Brennan, created the false Russia hoax, doctored intelligence to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States in 2016, and locked the report in a CIA vault for nearly a decade. On March 21, 2017, Devin Nunes traveled to the White House and informed President Trump that he was being overthrown. The following day, March 22, 2017, he stood alone, holding an unexpected press conference confirming that Barack Obama had spied on Trump and the Trump campaign. On April 17, 2017, Devin Nunes was forced to resign from the House Intelligence Committee’s Obama-Russia inquiry—because Paul Ryan is a piece of garbage. Now, give the man the Presidential Medal of Freedom—at once.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker stated that the intelligence community incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition on numerous occasions. Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting. Additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked. The speaker emphasized that none of this surveillance was related to Russia or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team.
The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its dissemination to determine: who was aware of it; why it was not disclosed to Congress; who requested and authorized the additional unmasking; whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates; and whether any laws, regulations, or procedures were violated.
The speaker requested that the directors of the FBI, NSA, and CIA expeditiously comply with a March 15 letter to provide a full account of these surveillance activities. The speaker informed Speaker Ryan this morning of the new information and will go to the White House this afternoon to share what is known with the President and his team.
In addition, the speaker expressed concern about a terrorist attack in the United Kingdom and offered thoughts and prayers to the UK. The speaker noted intelligence reports clearly show that the president-elect and his team were at least monitored and disseminated in intelligence reporting channels.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning or good afternoon, everyone. I recently confirmed that on numerous occasions, the intelligence community incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition. Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting. Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked. And fourth and finally, I wanna be clear, none of this surveillance was related to Russia or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team.
The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination to determine a few things here that I wanna read off. Who was aware of it? Why it was not disclosed to Congress? Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking? Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates, and whether any laws, regulations, or procedures were violated.
I've asked the directors of FBI, NSA, and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15 letter that you all received a couple weeks ago and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities. I informed speaker Ryan this morning of this new information, and I will be going to the White House this afternoon to share what I know with the President and his team. Before I get to questions, I want to say that, as you know, there's just been a what appears to be a terrorist attack in The United Kingdom. Obviously, very concerned, and our thoughts and prayers go out to our strong friends and allies over across the pond. I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored and disseminated out in intelligence and what appears to be raw or or I shouldn't say raw, but intelligence reporting channels.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read Mueller’s opening statement on the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Hoax: he says he won’t answer any questions about Barack Obama’s plan to overthrow the United States government. You just can’t make this stuff up!
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: The co-conspirator Robert Mueller—his opening statement on the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Hoax: He says he will not answer any questions about, regarding, concerning, relating to, in connection with, or pertaining to Barack Obama’s plan to overthrow the United States government. 📝 You just can’t make this stuff up!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The department has issued a letter outlining restrictions on the speaker’s testimony, and as a result, the speaker will not answer questions on topics of public interest that fall under those restrictions. Specifically, questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before the speaker’s appointment, and matters related to the Steele dossier cannot be addressed. These topics are the subject of ongoing review by the department, and any inquiries should be directed to the FBI or the Justice Department.
The speaker reiterates the importance of adhering to what is written in the department’s report. The report contains the findings and analysis, along with the reasons for the decisions made. The speaker states that the results of the investigation were stated with precision and that there is no intention to summarize or describe the results in a different way during the testimony. Moreover, the speaker has previously stated that they will not comment on the actions of the attorney general or of Congress.
The speaker emphasizes a commitment to their role and to the standards of the department. They note that they were appointed as a prosecutor and intend to adhere to that role and to the department standards that govern. Finally, the speaker reflects on a history of challenges to democracy, highlighting that the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in U.S. elections are among the most serious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The department has released a letter discussing the restrictions on my testimony. But I therefore will not be able to answer questions about certain areas that I know are of public interest. For example, I am unable to address questions about the opening of the FBI's Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so called Steele dossier. These matters are the subject of ongoing review by the department. Any questions on these topics should therefore be directed to the FBI or the just justice department.
Third, as I explained this morning, it is important for me to adhere to what we wrote in our report. The report contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We stated the results of our investigation with precision. I do not intend to summarize or describe the results of our work in a different way in the course of my testimony today. And as I stated in May, I also will not comment on the actions of the attorney general or of congress.
I was appointed as a prosecutor, and I intend to adhere to that role and to the department standards that govern. Finally, as I said this morning, over the course of my career, I've seen a number of challenges to our democracy. The Russian government's efforts to interfere in our election is among the most serious.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on a shocking investigation by James O’Keefe. The GSA, which runs federal services, allegedly moves unaccompanied children as commodities, with a $347 million contract to transport them. Clarissa Rippee, a GSA contract specialist, says it felt like a gut punch and that this “big money” business must stop, for the children. It’s about exposing exploitation.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: One of the most shocking investigations by @JamesOKeefeIII. The General Services Administration (GSA), which manages all services for the federal government — including, trafficking of children. Clarissa Rippee, a whistleblower, blows the lid off the #1 child sex trafficking organization on the planet: the Biden-Harris administration. “Unaccompanied children are being treated like commodities… like potato chips on a truck.” The whistleblower exposes a $347 million contract for transporting unaccompanied children — “What you know, you cannot unknow.” “My line-in-the-sand moment was when I found out that GSA had awarded a contract to a company to transport unaccompanied minors,” said current General Services Administration (GSA) Contract Specialist Clarissa Rippee, revealing shocking details about a $347 million contract awarded to a company responsible for moving unaccompanied children across the United States. “It felt like someone kicked me in the gut,” Rippee added. Rippee, who works inside the GSA, described the unaccompanied children as being treated like “commodities… like potato chips on a truck.” She emphasized that the contract represents a “big money business,” moving children — often separated from their families — under inhumane conditions. “What you know, you cannot unknow,” Rippee said, explaining that the horrifying conditions she witnessed compelled her to speak out. “It’s about the children, and it’s my duty now to speak up.” Rippee also noted the disturbing normalization of such practices within the government: “It’s just an accepted part of the bureaucracy. But the reality is, this is exploitation, and it has to stop.” @JamesOKeefeIII is the news.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Clarissa Rippy, a contract specialist at General Services Administration (GSA), discusses her “line in the sand” moment upon learning that GSA had awarded a contract to transport unaccompanied minors. She describes the gut-punch feeling and the night she began researching, performing keyword searches such as “transport unaccompanied minors” and “immigrant children,” which led back to NGOs and companies like Acuity, the original awardee, and later MVM when they protested the award. She explains that she had just received a promotion to work in the transportation and logistics area of GSA and was not aware the agency would be involved in transporting unaccompanied minors.
Speaker 1 notes the contract figures: “Action obligation, 40,000,000. Total contract value, $347,000,000,” highlighting that this was “over a quarter of a billion dollars” to transport unaccompanied children and calling it “a big money business.” The conversation references the broader crisis depicted in the film Light in the Sand, where many busing companies profited from the situation, prompting the question of whether Rippy knew the names of these companies.
Rippy confirms that within TTL she learned about the contract award to transport unaccompanied minors and describes her reaction: shock and guilt, given she had recently been promoted and was unaware her agency was involved. The night she learned, she conducted searches for details about “transport of immigrant children.” She references Acuity as the original awardee and notes that MVM protested the award and the contract ended up back with MVM. She highlights the financial scale of DHS payments: “In the last nine months, MVM has received over $129,000,000 from the Department of Homeland Security, $719,000,000 from DHS overall.”
Rippy emphasizes the human impact, describing illegal immigrant minors being shipped “every hour of the day, especially like late at night,” while the narrator notes these are “the illegal immigrants, minors who are coming over without their parents.” She states that these children were being moved around, which caused personal guilt. When shown documents, she identifies a GSA contract awarded to MVM and reiterates the contract figures, underscoring the concern that the system treated children as commodities, given the clause describing a contractor to transport “a thousand children within a twenty four hour period of notification.”
The dialogue questions the rationale behind such quotas, with the suggestion that this is used to justify contracts, comparing children to “widgets or products.” They comment on the lack of federal employee discussion about the issue and discuss why Rippy remains engaged: she cannot forget what she learned, and she speaks about doing what she believes she was placed on Earth to do. She remarks that she is not afraid of retaliation, framing her actions as a moral duty.
The interview concludes with a call to support whistleblowers and the Citizen Journalism Foundation, and a tease about the film Line in the Sand premiering October 10 on the Tucker Carlson Network. Rippy closes with a humanitarian message: “It takes a village to protect a child.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My line in the sand moment was when I found out that GSA had awarded a contract to a company to transport unaccompanied minors.
Speaker 1: What was that like for you?
Speaker 0: It was like someone kicked me in my gut. Once I found out about the contract, that night, I got on my computer and I started doing a Google search.
Speaker 1: Action obligation, 40,000,000. Total contract value, $347,000,000. That's over a quarter of a billion dollars. That's a lot of money to transport unaccompanied children. I mean, this is a this is a big money business.
Speaker 0: And that's why we're sitting here today because, as I shared before, what you know, you cannot unknow.
Speaker 1: The crisis of conscience would only grow and reach inside the holy grail of the unaccompanied child transportation business. There's the white buses right there. That's the FedEx transportation hub for the unaccompanied minor children. They stop the transportation of children. They stop the money.
Speaker 0: My name is Clarissa Rippy.
Speaker 1: And where do you work?
Speaker 0: I work for General Services AKA GSA.
Speaker 1: And for those who are not familiar with what GSA is or what it does, can you talk a little about that?
Speaker 0: GSA, it basically manages all the services for the federal government. Then you have the transportation side of GSA that manages travel, transportation, and logistics, which is that's the area that I'm working in right now.
Speaker 1: And what sort of thing do you do in that department?
Speaker 0: I'm what's called an eleven oh two. I'm a contract specialist and my responsibility is to work with contractors that provide products and services to the federal government. And I work on a team of contracting officers and we award those contracts.
Speaker 1: NGO stands for nongovernmental organization. But in addressing political and social issues, they receive money from the government. These groups get large amounts of money. The more immigrants they represent, the more money they receive. Follow it.
The film Light in the Sand, we saw so many of these companies. People were amazed and shocked to see just how many busing companies and making so much money off of the crisis. Were you aware of some of those names of those companies in the film?
Speaker 0: Not originally. Then I came over to TTL and became aware that GSA had awarded a contract for the transportation services.
Speaker 1: What was your line in the sand moment here in this situation?
Speaker 0: My line in the sand moment was when I found out that GSA had awarded a contract to a company to transport unaccompanied minors.
Speaker 1: So you found this out and then you had this line in the sand moment. What was that like for you?
Speaker 0: It was like someone kicked me in my gut because I had just gotten a promotion, accepted the position for that particular division, and I was not aware at all that the agency that I worked for was party to transporting unaccompanied minors. Once I found out about the contract that night, I got on my computer and I started doing a Google search. And I did keyword searches. I did transport unaccompanied minors. I put in transport of immigrant children and all of these websites popped up and it led back to some of these NGOs and these companies, you know, like Acuity, which was the original awardee of the contract.
And then MVM protested that award and the contract wound up back with MVM.
Speaker 1: Within the last nine months, MVM has received over $129,000,000 from the Department of Homeland Security, $719,000,000 from DHS overall.
Speaker 0: But as I continued to read the documents that I found online, I found out these are the illegal immigrants, minors who are coming over without their parents, without anyone that they knew being shipped at every hour of the day, especially like late at night when we are all asleep in our beds and our children are safe at home. These children were being shipped all over the place.
Speaker 1: Shipped over and that must have made you feel guilty
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: For having this promotion.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And that was your line in the sand moment. And and we also have some some some documents here, that we've we've been provided by you. Just tell me tell me what this this one here indicates.
Speaker 0: It was a GSA contract that was awarded to MVM.
Speaker 1: And so it says here in this document that action obligation 40,000,000, base and all option, total contract value 347,000,000. That's that's that's over a quarter of a billion dollars. Mhmm. That's a lot of money
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: To transport unaccompanied children. Mhmm. I mean, this is a this is a big money business. It just seems like lost in all of this is any semblance of right and wrong. It's just a it it it it a lot of people in in who watched Line in the Sand, the takeaway is it's all about money.
And there's no regard for children or human beings.
Speaker 0: Evidently, it's been very effective.
Speaker 1: Very effective.
Speaker 0: They have noted that they wanted the contractor to transport a thousand children within a twenty four hour period of notification. A thousand children.
Speaker 1: Why do they want that?
Speaker 0: Exactly. That was my question. Why a thousand every time within a twenty four hour period?
Speaker 1: It seems like a quota or something to justify the contracts. It's almost like they treat these children like widgets or products. Products. Like Exactly. Potato chips and
Speaker 0: a back
Speaker 1: of a transport vehicle. Don't see, I don't see a lot of federal employees sitting down to speak about this. What led you to be here?
Speaker 0: Now that I'm privy to this information, I can't forget about it. You know, I can't just say I'm just gonna wipe my brain clean. It never happened.
Speaker 1: But most people do. Yes. So why is that?
Speaker 0: And I'm guilty of that too. You know, you hear someone will share information with you and you're just like, No, I just want my quiet life. I don't want to be involved. I just don't want all the drama. I just want to live my peaceful life and just, you know, just
Speaker 1: Go through the comforts of life. Comforts of Like Derek Cochran, my former whistleblower friend, he said, People just want to go through the comforts of life. Yes, And a lot of people are gonna wonder, are you afraid of, First of all, you're doing nothing wrong. You're just speaking the truth. Nothing that you've said here is improper in any way or illegal in any way.
If anything, you're just being honest about about the way it is. But you know how these people can be and how these government agencies can be. Are you concerned about retaliation?
Speaker 0: No. I'll tell you why. Lord, what they is are your mission. This is what you have placed us here for this very moment. This is what the Lord has placed in my heart to do.
And people can try and do whatever they want to do to me, but they're not fighting me. They're fighting God. This is about the children.
Speaker 1: We got an unaccompanied minor right here, guys. This is heartbreaking right here. If
Speaker 0: over a quarter of a million American born children were missing, It would be spoken about in every Starbucks coffee shop, in every restaurant, everywhere you walk someone would be talking about, Did you hear about three eighty plus thousand children missing in The United States? Right now, people would be talking about, but because these are children from other countries, no names, no faces attached to them. People go to sleep, they lay their heads down every night, and they wake up oblivious to the fact that some mother, some father, some grandparent is missing their baby.
Speaker 1: I don't think people know about it. Right. When you were at the premiere in Newport Beach or the film Line in the Sand, tell me about that experience for you. I have some breaking news for you here this evening. Working for GSA, she became aware of contracts, for the transportation of unaccompanied children.
Recognize it's very emotional. Come on up.
Speaker 0: It was like a second kick in the gut, but it had faces this time. It wasn't a contract, words on a sheet of paper. It was actual faces. All that said, you know the saying that you don't know what you don't know. Right?
Well, see, now you do know, and you cannot unknow what you know now.
Speaker 1: I know you're just trying to do your job. That's tough. Yeah. It's it's not easy. Yeah.
Especially when you have a little three year old girl walk up to you. Three year old girls?
Speaker 0: That's not easy.
Speaker 1: Last week, I had three year old come up, and all he had was a a paper sewed into his shirt. Address and phone number were wrong. As a parent, I don't like seeing that. It makes me get closer to my kids. I thought he said there was an unaccompanied child that you guys just picked up.
Yeah. We got we got a few, like, three that we that we had earlier. Traffic. Traffic? Yeah.
They're they're they're gone already. Traffic.
Speaker 0: The last thing I wanna say is there's another saying. It takes a village to raise a child. No. Not true. It takes a village to protect a child.
Yes. Have to protect our children. And the only reason why I'm why I'm here is because that's my duty now. I cannot unknow what I know now.
Speaker 1: God bless you. You're a hero. If you support portal agents like Zach, please support us at Citizen Journalism Foundation. We provide funding to help these brave whistleblowers and legal defense funds. Here is information for Citizen Journalism Foundation, and stay tuned for the movie, Line in the Sand, premiering October 10 on the Tucker Carlson Network.
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe how, on CNN’s Conspiracy Day, an IT expert claims to access a Mesa County forensic image and show Trump votes switched to Biden by changing an index, leaving no trace, and that Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide. Data claim: 221,000 Pennsylvania votes switched; 941,000 Trump votes deleted; 435,000 votes switched nationwide. Finally, I call to emancipate Tina Peters.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is— 81,000,000 CRIMES: LIVE ON CNN, “CONSPIRACY DAY,” NOVEMBER 3, 2020: An IT expert, after gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion Rigging Management System in Mesa County, Colorado, demonstrates how your government was overthrown on November 3, 2020. He shows how Trump votes were switched to Joe Biden in seconds—simply by changing the index number—and without leaving a trace. TREASON: Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide. Data analysis finds: • 221,000 Pennsylvania votes switched from President Trump to Biden. • 941,000 Trump votes deleted. • States using Dominion Voting Systems switched 435,000 votes from Trump to Biden. Now, emancipate Tina Peters at once.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Totals being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name.
Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. So is it certified? It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are.
You can see Biden has 31,000. Trump has 56,000. K. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that to a two? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a one. Okay. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun the port.
And there you go. Biden, 56,000. Trump, 31,000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged.
There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained.
Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time is approximately 11:09PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden.
This means Trump lost 39,916 votes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Totals being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name.
Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. So is it certified? It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are.
You can see Biden has 31,000. Trump has 56,000. K. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that.
You changed that to a two? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a one. Okay. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun the port.
And there you go. Biden, 56,000. Trump, 31,000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged.
There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained.
Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time is approximately 11:09PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden.
This means Trump lost 39,916 votes.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Hey Adam, This is your Speaker, on videotape, taking responsibility for not INVITING the National Guard on January 6 — and you, as part of the convicted felons on the January 6 Committee, hid it from public view for nearly three years. By the way, why did you @AdamKinzinger receive a pardon?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Pelosi asks, “Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.” The other participant replies, “I can.” Pelosi then asks, “Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?” The respondent retorts, “Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?” Pelosi concludes, “The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Pelosi Alright. Check that. Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.
Speaker 1: I can.
Speaker 0: Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?
Speaker 1: Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?
Speaker 0: The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read claims that CIA-declassified documents at the Olympic level and emails from Soros’ foundation allege a long-term plan to demonize Putin and Trump, approved by Hillary Clinton, to tie Trump to Russia for distraction. It says Obama ordered a manufactured ICA report as part of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, followed by impeachments, investigations, raids, assassination attempts, and an overthrow in 2020. Any questions?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: Documents declassified by CIA Director John Ratcliffe — at the Olympic level. Emails from George Soros’ Open Society Terrorist Foundation: “It will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump,” approved by HRC — Hillary Rodham Clinton — “to tie Trump to Russia as a means of distracting people from her own missing emails, especially if the affair reaches an Olympic level. For now, it serves to provide a post-convention bounce. Later, the FBI will be right there to add more oil to the fire.” In other words — yes indeed — Barack Hussein Obama was right there, taking it to the Olympic level by ordering a manufactured ICA report as part of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the United States government in 2016 — and a long-term affair to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States in 2017. Followed by two impeachments, multiple investigations, indictments, raids, two assassination attempts, and ultimately, the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. Any questions?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. These emails quote a Clinton campaign adviser saying, "it will be a long term affair" and to "demonize Putin and Trump," and that, "later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire." Other emails reportedly reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents purportedly provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp.
The transcript adds that, despite these alleged disclosures, the Obama intel community forged ahead with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. He quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, quote, it will be a long term affair and to demonize Putin and Trump. And adds that, quote, later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire, unquote. Other emails reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, and that was a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. These documents provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to acknowledging that the info they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp.
Despite this, the Obama intel community forged ahead with their 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.