TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RebelNewsOnline
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Ret. CAF Sgt. Mike Rude rips the RCMP for continuing to siege Universal Ostrich Farms despite the CFIA carrying out a slaughter of hundreds of healthy birds days ago. https://t.co/Etwd1Kl2QV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker contends that veterans, and by extension the sacrifices made by soldiers, are being betrayed by the current government. They question what veterans fought for with Canada, the UK, and other nations, asking what those sacrifices were for if the government now harasses families, suppresses people, and acts like a bully. They imply that the sacrifices of the 158 who died in Afghanistan were for nothing and accuse the government of taking over farms and suppressing families.
A persistent refrain is that the RCMP and authorities are behaving like a gang. The speaker declares, “End gang life. How about we end the RCMP? That's what we should end because that's all you are is a gang,” asserting that the organization is harassing the family. They criticize the presence of law enforcement equipment and tactics, mentioning cars, drones, jammers, and other surveillance or enforcement tools, and contrast this with the claim that those being oppressed are only the family.
Throughout, there is a confrontation with the notion of Remembrance Day. The speaker argues that “here we are for Remembrance Day, and we're showing what the freedoms what those soldiers died for was nothing because you're taking away all our freedoms.” They claim that the government’s actions render the soldiers’ sacrifices meaningless, tying the erosion of freedoms to current governmental behavior.
The speaker personalizes the grievance by invoking their own family. They state, “My uncle died at 21 over Norway for you, assholes,” anchoring the critique in a family tragedy and linking it to the broader claim that sacrifices are being undermined. They emphasize that “before Remembrance Day” this message aims to demonstrate that what was fought for was for nothing, due to government behavior that disregards rules.
A recurring assertion is that “No rules apply to the RCMP or the CFIA. It only applies to the family that you're suppressing.” The speaker juxtaposes the supposed lack of accountability for authorities with the heightened scrutiny faced by the family they say is being harassed. Throughout, phrases such as “Phoenix,” “Leave,” and “Thank you for your service” appear as charged, emblematic interruptions, underscoring the speaker’s insistence on resisting the current regime and defying what they view as oppressive tactics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How about all the veterans who are now coming What did veterans what did we fight for with this government? What did we fight for Canada for? Of UK. Guys to do this to a family. Right?
Veterans are Well done before remembrance day to show that the sacrifices of the 158 that died in Afghanistan was for nothing because you are taking over the farm. You have you're harassing the family. You're suppressing the people. You're no good. Right?
Phoenix. Phoenix. Leave. Right? And thank you for your service.
Thank you for suppressing the people and only being bullies. Right? End gang life. How about we end the RCMP? That's what we should end because that's all you are is a gang.
Right? Here harassing the family. It's over, and you're still here. Right? You're still here harassing with all these cars, and the only person that ever crossed your line was to throw food at the fucking ostriches that weren't being fed.
Right? That's the only people, but you you fucking you got all the cars. You got the drones. You got the jammers. You got everything.
Happy know, here we are for Remembrance Day, and we're showing what the freedoms what those soldiers died for was nothing because you're taking away all our freedoms. My uncle died at 21 over Norway for you, assholes. Right? All of this before Remembrance Day to show what we can fought for was for nothing so that a government can come in. Don't don't bother with the rules.
No rules apply to the RCMP or the CFIA. It only applies to the family that you're suppressing. Right? That's the only thing. Right?
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
“Shame on you, dirty f**n bastards. She was 10 years old!”: Chaotic scenes erupt outside a Dublin migrant housing facility tonight, after an African migrant in his twenties was accused of raping a 10 year old child. https://t.co/m7raI7AxSW
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
A 10-year-old Irish girl was allegedly raped by a refugee at a migrant hotel owned by the government. How did she get there? Why was the migrant still there despite being ordered deported? Ezra is flying to Dublin to cover the massive protest. http://www.MigrantReports.com https://t.co/47ohgRTmCH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ezra Levant reports from Pearson Airport that he is flying overnight to Dublin, Ireland, following a horrific incident he describes as a 10-year-old girl missing from state care who “shows up” having been raped allegedly by a migrant staying at a government migrant hotel in Dublin. He states the government bought City West, Ireland’s largest hotel, for €150,000,000 and converted it into an urban refugee camp housing 2,000 people—primarily single military-aged migrant men—many of whom discarded their IDs before arriving. He claims these men are not proper refugees and describes them as violent, noting a high crime rate among residents and that they are allowed out into the community daily.
Levante asserts the migrant hotel is in the heart of Dublin, not isolated, and that the residents roam the city daily, with 2,000 men “planted in the heart of Dublin.” He says they receive a roof and three meals a day—more than many Irish homeless people—yet they spend their days in parks, drinking, harassing people on the street, and sitting in primary schoolyards. He frames the incident as part of a broader trend, saying Ireland has a rapid mass immigration program and that all major political parties and the regime media support mass immigration. He contrasts Ireland’s approach with other countries, asserting Ireland’s program is unusually fast and recent.
Levante states his aim is to cover what the Irish public thinks about the rape incident, as well as what people think about politicians, media, and “greedy migrant hotel industrialists,” and to provide the other side of the story beyond state media. He plans to speak with grassroots Irish people who have warned about the situation, and to report on the incident, the politicians, and media coverage. He and his cameraman, Lincoln Jay, are heading to City West Hotel, with a protest scheduled for 07:30 PM Irish time (02:30 PM East Coast time). He asks for help covering economy-class airfare to travel to Dublin, directing supporters to migrantreports.com, where all footage will be posted.
Levante closes by promising further updates once they land, stating: “My job for the next twenty four hours is to cover what the Irish people have to say and what they have to say not only about this horrific rape, but about the politicians and media and the greedy migrant hotel industrialists, what their role is in this too.” He ends with a call-and-response refrain: “What do we want? Raise your hands. Where do we want them? Damn.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ezra Levante here at Pearson Airport. As you can see, I'm about to hop on a plane and fly overnight to Dublin, Ireland. The most atrocious thing has happened. The worst thing in the world, the worst thing imaginable has happened in Dublin. A 10 year old girl went missing from state care, and then she shows up and she's been raped allegedly by a migrant staying at a government migrant hotel in Dublin, Ireland.
The government bought a massive hotel called City West, the largest hotel in Ireland. They paid a €150,000,000 for it. That's like a quarter billion dollars in Canada. It's a massive place. But they shut it down as a hotel and turned it into an urban refugee camp.
2,000 people, mainly single military aged migrant men, most of whom threw their ID into the water before they came aboard. They're they're fake refugees. But more than that, they're violent. The crime rate of of these men staying at this urban refugee camp are enormous and it's not like a prison. The men are allowed out every day.
Now, first of all, they're given a roof over their head and three meals a day, more than a lot of Irish homeless get, but they mill around by day. They go hang out in parks and they they get drunk. They harass people on the street, they sit in the schoolyards or primary schools. It was only a matter of time before something horrific like this happened. Understand this migrant hotel is right in the heart of Dublin.
It's not in a faraway place. It's not on some island and it is not enclosed by a prison wall. These men go into the community every day, 2,000 of them. Imagine a 2,000 man city planted in the heart of Dublin. The rage in Ireland is palpable online.
We're flying overnight. We wanna go and talk to the locals about this. How did this happen? Will it happen again? Will police and politicians ever take this seriously?
Is this the tipping point or will Ireland continue to be a mass immigration country? All the main political parties and all the regime media are fully in support of mass immigration. Ireland has a faster mass immigration program than anywhere else in the world. Maybe Canada has it worse, but in Ireland it's more shocking because it's happened so suddenly. I wanna cover what's going on and I wanna give people the other side of the story, not the state broadcaster RTE, not the politicians who cover it up.
I wanna talk to grassroots Irish people who have been warning about this. I'm flying overnight with our cameraman, Lincoln Jay. We'll land in the morning. We'll go straight to the City West Hotel. There is also gonna be a protest at 07:30PM Irish time.
That's 02:30PM East Coast North American time. We will be there. If you can help us cover the economy class airfare to get over there, I'd be grateful. Go to migrantreports.com. That's also where we're gonna put all our footage.
My job for the next twenty four hours is to cover what the Irish people have to say and what they have to say not only about this horrific rape, but about the politicians and media and the greedy migrant hotel industrialists, what their role is in this too. A shocking, shocking story, and we'll have more for you as soon as we land. For Rebel News, I'm Ezra Lemmat. You can follow the story at migrantreports.com. What do we want?
Raise your hands. Where do we want them? Damn.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Masako Ganaha (@ganaha_masako) travelled all the way from Japan to Davos, Switzerland, to cover the World Economic Forum and report on the threat of globalism. FULL REPORT by @EzraLevant: https://rebelne.ws/3XsORJw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ezra Levant introduces Masako, who approaches Avi Yamini in Davos and joins him on the show. Masako identifies as an independent journalist from Japan. Ezra notes that a young lady approached Avi in a supermarket cafeteria, calling him inspiring, and Masako has become a citizen journalist this year after being inspired by Avi’s journalism last year.
Masako expresses that she is honored to meet Ezra, Avi, and the team. Ezra remarks that Avi’s videos are entertaining and provide a strong point of view, but emphasizes that Masako flew all the way from Japan to Switzerland, bringing her camera gear, and has been doing real journalism. She is described as a person who has been inspired by Avi’s journalism and has become a citizen journalist this year, following Avi’s influence last year. Masako’s visit highlights the reach of Avi’s journalism and the commitment of an independent journalist from Japan who traveled to Davos to engage in on-the-ground reporting with Avi Yamini and the Rebel News team.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Which media are you with?
Speaker 1: I am an independent journalist from Japan.
Speaker 0: No. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: I have to ask. Thank you. Thanks. Things that we can do in our on our daily basis, we it's it's influencing them. It's impact.
So although they look big, our our fighting back actually means a lot.
Speaker 0: Ezra Levant here for Rebel News. On our first day in Davos, I was sitting with our team in a cafeteria of a supermarket, which we've been using as our remote office, and a young lady approached Avi Yamini out of the blue saying she was inspired by Avi's journalism last year, so now she's become a citizen journalist this year. Her name is Masako, and she joins me now. Great to see you. Thanks very much for coming on my show.
Speaker 1: I'm so honored to meet you and your team.
Speaker 0: Well, you're very kind and you've been very flattering. I was blown away when you came over to Avi and said that he inspired you. I mean, a lot of people watch Avi's videos. He's very entertaining and he has a very strong point of view. But for you to actually fly all the way from Japan to Switzerland, that's a very long way.
And you brought your camera gear, and you've been doing real journalism.
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
WATCH: Tommy Robinson FIRES BACK at press outside Westminster Magistrate's Court. Ezra Levant delivers EXCLUSIVE on-the-ground update with his thoughts on how the trial went so far. https://t.co/z3sNJeJaVF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Outside Westminster Magistrates Court, Tommy Robinson reports that "Only accredited journalists by when they say accredited, only government supported journalists were allowed to report on the second half of trial," meaning access was restricted. Ezra from Canada was gagged today. He alleges he was detained under the terrorism act and that "the reason for detaining me wasn't in order, it just made up so they get went along." He describes a forty-minute gap and an hour-and-a-half gap with no disclosure, noting "there's no evidence of it. There's no paperwork trial. There's no email trial." He says the proceedings used Islamophobia as justification: "Islamophobia. Islam what what even is Islamophobia?" He predicts tomorrow's verdict and accuses police of fabrications. A second commenter says the court's mission is "simply to get Tommy Robinson." He praises citizen journalism growth, mentions BBC interference, and cites "43,000 jihadis" under surveillance. For support visit tommytrial.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tommy, you're now coming out of the court. What's happened? Only accredited journalists by when they say accredited, only government supported journalists were allowed to report on the second half of trial, which means no one, I guess, out here because you're gonna heard it from the mainstream media. Because I've looked for the mainstream media's reporting on the case this morning. It's insane.
It's fucking insane. They're lying. All the unlawful stuff they've done, all the illegal stuff they've done, and not one part of it has been on. It's mad, which is a need for people like Ezra and other people who have flown over from Canada to come and report on this. Unfortunately, he's been gagged this gagged today from when we went back in.
No one else other than government control, which was that? That's communism, though. Only government controlled media are allowed to report what's going on inside the courtroom, and it's meant to be about fair and open justice for people to understand. The reason why we need citizen journalists is because these fucking frauds don't report. We've seen that by the reporting this morning.
We've seen that. But a an officer has accepted this afternoon, which you wouldn't have heard, that he held me unlawfully because he was supposed to have done certain things that he didn't do, and then there was three different things that he was lawfully had to do that he didn't do in order to detain me under terrorism act. It's not like we're stopping you for a quick check-in your car. We're nicking you for terrorism. We're using terrorism legislation to detain you and pump around the whole world that you're being charged under the terrorism act.
You better make sure your shit's in order, and none of it's in order. The reason for detaining me wasn't in order, it just made up so they get went along. What we've what we then found out is they made up stuff today that's not in their statements. Do you know how many times we've asked them for disclosure? And they've refused it.
So we've gone back saying, what did you do for an hour and a half? Because they detained me. There was a forty minute gap, then there's another hour and a half gap. What were you doing in that time? From stopping me originally, what was going on?
We know what's going on. It was going up the ladder to the top. Yeah? And they were making decisions. But they didn't make any notice.
And even though we asked them, what were you doing? They refused to answer. And then today, we were taking, taking information from other other organizations. Well, you we've asked you that multiple times. You have to give us disclosure, which they haven't given.
They didn't give. So now there's been a no another application to make the judge aware. We've asked all this information, then they've bullshit up today in court where there's no evidence of it. There's no paperwork trial. There's no email trial.
There's nothing. And then he started making up, John. His reason was Islamophobia. Islamophobia. Islam what what even is Islamophobia?
They're taking it from the labor government's Islamophobia bill. You talk about Islam, we're gonna hit you on terrorism. That's it. Anyway And back tomorrow. And back tomorrow for the verdict.
Let's hope the judge gives us something to have a bit more faith in judges in The UK forward. Last time I was in this court, got positive result from a from a judge. I wish I was tried by a jury, but I think after the judge listening to absolute facade of a shit show of legal corruption and bullshit from a police force, which detained someone under terrorism act within thirty seconds of seeing who I was. And then they've tried to make up and wrote statements six months later and nine months later. Why didn't you write this at the time?
Why did why are you wrote multiples to all of the officers trying to get their ducks in Uganda? That's what they were trying to do a year later. But why did you detain them? And then they're making up all the reasons. So let's see what happens today.
Has the trial finished today, Tommy? Yeah. Turn the turn the camera off, sir. You remember the press using that, mate. Sorry, the judge to make sure Ezra will stop reporting.
He did. He went was the grass. He went as a member of the press to point out that he's sitting in the public gallery, and he's reporting on this case to prevent him reporting so that the only narrative you get is from them. Fast car, cashing that, cashing his car. Why do have cash in the car?
Because we clicked it at demonstration the day before, and I can't bank in The UK, you monks. So anyway,
Speaker 1: Well, hi, everybody. As you can see, court is done. We're at the Westminster Magistrates Court in London. I don't know how many hours I've been up. I flew over from Toronto, really got maybe two hours sleep on the plane, came straight here from the airport because traffic's so crazy.
Haven't gone to the hotel yet, but had a very interesting day in court listening to the police try and excuse why they nicked or arrested Tommy under the terrorism act given that he's not a terrorist. And to watch four different police officers try and scramble to answer that question, one of them saying, well, ten years ago, he was with the English defense league. But, yes, I know that that is now defunct for ten years. Well, then why what and by the way, the English Defense League was never a terrorist group, never regarded as an extremist group. So there's so many weird after the fact excuses that these cops have hooked up, and what's extra weird is that they took weeks or even months to do it.
So they had their first witness statements, and they didn't, in that, put sufficient facts forward to justify arresting and holding Tommy under the terrorist mech. So they continuously sort of patched up. They changed their original story months later. It was really bizarre police work, bizarre until you remember that a central mission of the court system in The UK now is simply to get Tommy Robinson. Now I enjoyed court because I I feel like I'm in my milieu.
I used to be a lawyer, so I understand some things. I I'm friends with Tommy, so I I know his side of the story. I'm a good typist, I can type things faster. My tweets cumulatively had almost 7,000,000 views until the judge ordered me to stop live tweeting, and I was confused by that. But someone next to me in the gallery said that a BBC reporter had complained to the court that I was tweeting from the court as were so many other people, but only I was the subject of the BBC's complaint.
That's the third time the BBC has interfered with my journalism. Dominique Cassiani, a BBC journalist, actually reported me to the police once for my tweeting. I'm not even kidding. That's a true story. And then on on another occasion, he interrupted a trial to complain about my tweets.
Both of those were laughed in his face. But this third one here today, the BBC complaining about me, tomorrow morning, have to present my credentials to the judge. And I told him in Canada, we don't have like, there is no government regulation. Well, I guess there there is for a certain government grant, but there's no press card. That's just not really a thing.
Although, I am a member of the Independent Press Gallery. Anyways, I'll talk to the judge in the morning, and I'll try and convince him that I've been live tweeting cases in The UK for a decade. It would be sort of weird to stop now, but that just shows you how pernicious their media party is here. I mean, it's bad enough that they lie about Tommy. Of course, they do.
But to try to stop other journalists from telling the story is extra incredible. However, you know what? I'm I'm seeing something here that I saw with Tamara Leach's trial in Ottawa on October 7, is what I saw on September 13, Tommy's big rally. And it's that citizen journalism has just grown exponentially in the last few months. I mean, where once I would be covering something like this and there would be me and maybe one or two other citizen journalists.
Now there's dozens. There's huge scrums and the cumulative reach is enormous. So I'm I'm actually more optimistic than ever about the media part of the story, is why the left is so adamant on bringing in hate speech laws and the online harms act as it's called here or the online safety act. I think that's what they call it here in in The UK. And in Canada, they're doing the same thing.
They're bringing back the online harms bill. There's a lot of attempts to censor, but between Elon Musk strengthening Twitter and, I don't know, just a whole new crop of individual citizen journalists, I'm actually feeling pretty good about things. If I had to predict how things are gonna end tomorrow, if it was anyone else in the world, let's say Tommy will be acquitted and the police will be chastised by the the courts for abusing the terrorism act. But it's Tommy Robinson. Oh, let me just take a look at how many cops there are here.
It's just absurd. I mean, the police believe their own b s about how dangerous Tommy is. Like, seriously, one, three, four, five, six. There's probably oh, then there's more cops down there. Do you see that?
Like, there's at least 20 cops here. Yeah. Tommy Robinson's not your problem. The hundreds of thousands of Hamas supporters who marched literally yesterday in The UK, that's your problem. And that's you know, in fact, the policing here today is a microcosm of what's going on in The UK.
It is easier to arrest Tommy Robinson because he's not gonna blow you up. It's easier to arrest Tommy Robinson because he doesn't flee the country. In fact, he comes back to The UK from overseas to face justice. So it's easier to push him and his supporters around rather than take on the 43,000 jihadis who are under surveillance in The UK. Like, think about that.
43,000 would be terrorists that we know of, let alone hundreds of thousands of terrorists sympathizers. Yeah. Of course, they're gonna go after It's the path of least resistance, but that's not the right thing, that's one of the reasons why The UK is in such jeopardy. Anyways, I'll do my best tomorrow to convince the judge to let me live tweet. It's sort of crazy that I can't even type things.
Like, I I'm not taking photos. I'm not taking videos. I'm just sitting there typing my thoughts. It's it's so even that itself is sort of an echo of The UK thinking that they can control ideas, and I just don't think that's the way of a free country like The United Kingdom. Anyways, I'm a guest here, and I'm a guest in the court.
So I'll do what the judge says, but I will make an effort to convince them that freedom of speech should live in 2025. Alright. I'll have more on this. You If wanna support my journalism, which is not government funded, go to tommytrial.com. We'll see you tomorrow.
reSee.it AI Summary
I am Douglas Lloyd, CEO of MediaTube, a small Canadian tech company. In 2012, we created a groundbreaking product that could transform television viewing. After initial enthusiasm from Bell Canada, they abruptly stopped communicating and allegedly used our patented technology without credit or compensation. Despite our legal battles, including a 2016 trial where we were ruled against, we uncovered discrepancies in Bell's court testimonies. Now, facing a contempt motion and gag order from Bell, we are fighting for our invention and the rights of all small companies silenced by larger corporations.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Bell Canada hangs up on entrepreneur — then allegedly steals his patented technology! “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Douglas Lloyd is the CEO of MediaTube, a small Canadian technology company. In 2012, MediaTube developed a breakthrough product that Lloyd says would’ve “changed how the world watches television.” Lloyd further states: “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Here’s the skinny, according to Lloyd: MediaTube reached out to Bell Canada 13 years ago. Bell was allegedly very enthused about MediaTube’s technology. The two companies collaborated, and things got off to a rosy start. But then, inexplicably, Bell Canada executives were no longer returning Lloyd’s calls. It was baffling. But then, Lloyd alleges: “They [Bell] changed their network, used our invention, and left us behind – no credit, no compensation, no apology.” So it was that MediaTube sued Bell Canada. In the 2016 Federal Court trial, MediaTube’s expert witnesses submitted detailed reports showing that Bell’s network was infringing on the company’s patent. For its part, Bell told the court and MediaTube that the network evidence they submitted was “wrong” and would be “corrected.” But by then, the damage had already been done. Bell’s new evidence was relied on at trial, and the court ruled against MediaTube. The company appealed in 2019 at the Federal Court of Appeal. That court upheld the original decision. But get this: Lloyd says judges presiding over the case were former lawyers who worked for – drum roll, please – Bell Canada! Surely this is conflict of interest. Surely such judges would recuse themselves from any case involving Bell. But no… Fast-forward to 2020 and something extraordinary happened: Bell was sued again for patent infringement, this time by a U.S. company called Rovi Guides Inc. That’s when MediaTube discovered something it could never have imagined – the court exhibits and technical testimony Bell submitted in the MediaTube trial were different from what they submitted in Rovi’s trial. Says Lloyd: “We began digging more. We reviewed other Bell court cases. And it became clear: the network description Bell used to defend itself in our trial actually bears little to no resemblance to the way their network actually operates, at least according to their testimony in Rovi versus Bell and in other testimony and documents supplied under oath to the Court and the CRTC.” From 2022 through 2024, MediaTube documented the discrepancies, gathered court filings, checked transcripts, and began to connect the dots. “In April 2025, we wrote directly to the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., Bell Canada’s parent company, and asked them to explain the contradictions – to look at the evidence themselves and respond,” says Lloyd. As for Bell’s response, the corporation went into attack mode. In May 2025, Bell filed a contempt motion against MediaTube and the Lloyd personally. Then in late June, Bell asked the court for a gag order — to prevent Lloyd from speaking to regulators, shareholders, and the media. “They [Bell] don’t want the public to hear what we found,” says Lloyd. “They want us erased. We are a small company with no legal team left – but we are still standing. We believe in the truth. We believe in accountability. And we believe you deserve to hear this story.” Lloyd says his company has launched a campaign that will fund the following: • Legal defence against the contempt motion and gag order • Regulatory complaints with the SEC, FCC, DOJ, and Canadian agencies • A public awareness campaign and documentary to expose what really happened • Protection of free speech and shareholder rights “We’re fighting not just for our invention -- but for every small company that’s been pushed out, every voice silenced, and every truth buried by power,” says Lloyd. “Bell Canada took our patented IPTV invention. Now they want to take our voice.” Rebel News reached out to Bell’s media relations team for comment several times. Bell’s media team didn’t even acknowledge our requests. All of which is quite odd behaviour coming from a corporation that runs the “Let’s Talk” campaign every February. Then again, if Lloyd’s allegations are indeed accurate, it would appear that Bell is less of a caring corporation and more of a belligerent bully…
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Menzies interviews Douglas Lloyd, CEO of MediaTube, about a decades‑long dispute with Bell Canada over IPTV patents. Lloyd describes starting work with Bell in the early 2000s, ending the relationship in 2007, and Bell's 2010 Five TV launch that triggered a patent suit in 2013. The four‑week 2016 trial ended with MediaTube losing, because Bell claimed the network used was correct, a claim Lloyd now says is false. He asserts Bell altered and fabricated evidence in 2016 and that the same network appeared in Bell evidence in 2014 and 2020. He cites related cases (Rovy, Two Way Media) supporting the claim. Bell filed contempt of court against Lloyd on May 1 after he presented evidence to Bell's board on April 28. MediaTube has spent about $10 million on lawyers; the court has not ruled on June 23 evidence, and Lloyd now represents himself. He has written to Justice Minister Sean Fraser and the federal court administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: David Menzies for Rebel News here in Bobcaygeon, Ontario. And folks, I'm with Douglas Lloyd. He is the CEO of MediaTube, and this is an absolutely fascinating story. What began decades ago as a business arrangement with one of Canada's biggest telcos that would be Bell Canada. Well, it's been something that has been before the courts for years and years and years.
And, there are all kinds of allegations against Bell of it not acting in good faith, of it acting actually fraudulently. It's a heck of a saga, but we're gonna try to condense it, so that, we can make sense of it in a ten minute report. And, Douglas, thank you very much for making time to talk with us. Now we we spoke off camera. Let's go back to the very beginning, and I guess we're going back a quarter century now.
You engage Bell Canada with your, patented technology, Internet Protocol Television, which was a really big deal. It was, you were among a a world first, I understand, in developing this patent. You went to Bell. How did things begin, and how do things go off the rails?
Speaker 1: Well, it started in in 02/2003, 02/2004 working with, with Bell Canada on the on developing of this technology because we we were we had the patent, not only in Canada, but different parts of the world. We ended up ending that working relationship about 02/2007, and we decided to build our own IPTV, system starting in Toronto, under license, broadcast license with the CRTC. And we were gonna launch it in 2010, in in the 2010. Bell surprisingly came out with their announcement of five TV in September 2010, which led us into having to file a lawsuit against them in 2013 for patent infringement, which finally did get the trial in 2016. It was a four week trial, which we lost because Bell Canada's approved, at trial that their new network that they had given us, that the first network was wrong, and then they gave us a new network that was supposedly the right network.
So needless to say, we lost that that that court battle in in 2016.
Speaker 0: And was that claim by Bell accurate?
Speaker 1: No. It was not. We have now proven it's not. It's taken us a lot of years to get the evidence from the CRTC and other court cases where Bell had been sued. So what we did is we took the other court cases and we compared them to our court case, and then we found out that the material that Bell gave us and said that was wrong in 2016 was the same network that they were using in 2014, two years before we sued them, then, and of course, it was the same network they supplied as evidence in a in a court case in 2020.
Speaker 0: So you're alleging that Bell is lying even though this is supposedly a reputable Canadian company, publicly traded. But on the stand, they're not telling the truth. Do I have that right?
Speaker 1: Correct. So what we did is we compiled this information from the other court cases and see and and what Bell had filed with the CRTC and and and in the other court cases. We confronted Bell with this in 2021. Nothing came out of it. We actually took them to court in 2022, lost again.
They said that this had already been decided. We were trying to explain to the courts that the documentation we had compiled proves that the alteration of that evidence, we would have won that patent lawsuit.
Speaker 0: And, Douglas, as they say in Vegas, the fix is in. And by that, when we spoke off camera, you told me something that absolutely shocked me, which was some of the judges along the way Mhmm. Have been former lawyers representing Bell Canada. Surely, that's a conflict of interest. Surely, such a judge has to recuse himself from this matter, but that's not the case.
Speaker 1: No. That did not happen. The trial judge, judge Locke, worked for Norton Rose. He did all the patent trademark work for Bell Canada. The the judge, Stratus, David Stratus, did the appeal in 2019.
He also worked for Bell doing legal work. But, again, you you confront this with my lawyers, and they were very concerned that if you start accusing federal judges of conflict of interest, it wouldn't it would not play very well for media too. So we didn't push that fact. We we were going on the facts of law and on evidence
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Right, Which obviously didn't work very well. And even today, like, here we are now back in court as of May 1 with solid evidence of that Bell Canada altered and fabricated this evidence in 2016.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: We have solid proof in these other court cases that Bell was involved with, like Rovy and and Two Way Media and a few of the others. So we presented
Speaker 0: that and Rovy is that that's a US company, I understand, that also alleged Bell ripped off one of their patents.
Speaker 1: Correct. Yeah. Yeah. And so did two way media. So we took the evidence from from the the same lawyers, same same witnesses from Bell, same technology, but ours was definitely altered, and we've proven that.
So we gave this to Bell Bell's board of directors on April 28 and gave them all of the solid evidence. These are all court records. It's not something we made up. This is right from the court records and evidence, and we supplied that to Bell's board in April. Haven't heard a word from them.
What happened on May 1, they ordered me in court for contempt of court.
Speaker 0: Oh, what what was the issue of contempt?
Speaker 1: That Bell said that by showing this evidence to the public and to them, I was under a court order from 2018 and '28 and '19 that I was in breach of. So Bell brought a court case on May 1 to try to hold me in contempt of court.
Speaker 0: That's interesting. So they're now going on offense in this matter.
Speaker 1: Correct. Yeah. They came after me.
Speaker 0: So And Douglas, I gotta ask you. All these years, all these legal matters, all these lawyers, what has been the cost to MediaTube in terms of this legal process that seems to be a version of the never ending story?
Speaker 1: Well, right up until May 1, we had spent approximately $10,000,000 on lawyers in Canada, to to chase the truth.
Speaker 0: And would that be a major expenditure for your company?
Speaker 1: It it definitely is. Like, we have quite a few shareholders who have been funding this and helping us to get it to where it is. But, you know, there's an old saying, know, the truth remains hidden until it's found. Well, we found the truth, And we took it to court and and gave this the the evidence of the fraud to the court on June 23. Okay.
The court has refused to to rule on it. They ordered Bell to file a defense on this material that I filed in June 23. Bell had to file it by July 4. Bell is in default because it it how do you defend yourself against solid evidence of court records? So they just decided not to file.
Now I've been
Speaker 0: chief Douglas, if I may ask, what's going on here? What what's the unspoken story? Could it be that these judges are beholden to their former employee, Bell Canada? Because it all seems so one-sided to me.
Speaker 1: Well, it's it's this is very rare for a company to fight for twelve years to get to the truth. And when you when you compile that truth after twelve years and you take it to a court, and it's been before other judges over the years, And they didn't wanna rule on it. They didn't wanna see it. We took it to the to the just recently last year, we took it to the supreme court or the sorry. The Ontario Court of Justice and and under private prosecution.
They wouldn't deal with that either. And I think that one of the problems that they that we have here is it's a large public company, one of the largest in Canada Yeah. That have a lot of lawyers. Yes. Right?
And, of course, how did this get altered? How did it get fabricated? Did Bell do it, or did the lawyers do it? Nobody wants to discuss that. So what do they do?
They don't rule on anything. They just hope that eventually we will run out of time or or we'll get frustrated again because this has been in in case management now for a number of years. And here it is back again and still no decision.
Speaker 0: And Douglas, I think this is another example, and we've chronicled this at Rebel News before in so many cases, whether it's a civil lawsuit or a or a criminal process that, even if you succeed, even if someone is found not guilty, the process is the penalty, is it not? I mean, all this time that it has taken, all these millions of dollars in pursuing justice, is this a matter of almost Bell gaming the system, like, ragging the puck in a legalistic way to just wear you down?
Speaker 1: That's exactly how large corporations do it. The the difference here is is that we're we are a small very small company, a bit more of David and Goliath up against a very large corporation and very large law firms.
Speaker 0: But it sounds like Goliath's winning. Well, we have.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just the court does not wanna look at the solid evidence that we have, and that's what we're trying to get accomplished now. Okay. And and, you know, they're a publicly traded company. They won't even go public about this. They won't even talk to anybody about this.
They won't well, they haven't returned one single letter or email to the board of directors of BCE, and they haven't filed anything with any of the regulators.
Speaker 0: And that's a pretty big story, but, I guess we can't expect to read about this or watch it on any Bell Media properties.
Speaker 1: No. That's the other problem in Canada is is that that most of the media is controlled by the incumbents, like, whether it be Bell or or the other the other, telecom members. They control most of the media now in Canada. So it's very, very difficult.
Speaker 0: Douglas, where does it stand right now? I mean, is there any there there in terms of the chronology of of getting some kind of decision, some kind of finality, to this case. Because if what you say is is true, and I have no reason to doubt you that this huge, conglomerate, stole your patent, a, preventing you from, you know, realizing revenue from that, and then, b, has cost you over $10,000,000 in legal fees. I mean, where's the finish line to all this?
Speaker 1: Well, it's entirely up to the federal court. The the evidence is is with the court. The court has to rule on that solid evidence that we filed on June 23. Okay. The court's not ruling on it.
They're just waiting, waiting us out. Waiting till when? Well, maybe we give up, but you think after twelve years, we're not gonna give up.
Speaker 0: Okay then. So you've still got your lawyers, going to bat?
Speaker 1: Actually, what's happening right now is I'm I'm my own lawyer because Bell Bell came after me personally for contempt of court. Right. I decided to defend myself, and I've done a pretty good job of it. You know, after twelve years, you learn a lot about the law in in Canada and the federal rules. You know, I can dictate them from memory very easily.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: So, no, I've I've I've done everything perfectly proper properly. I I filed under the court when I was ordered to do so. I followed all the court procedures to a t. Who hasn't is Bell Canada. Yeah.
And what has the court done about it? Nothing.
Speaker 0: And, Douglas, if Bell is successful in getting a positive ruling to their charge of contempt of court, What kind of penalty are we talking about?
Speaker 1: Oh, I could end up in jail for quite a few years.
Speaker 0: You must be shaking your head that night. I mean, I can't imagine the stress you've gone through these past twenty years.
Speaker 1: It's been very, very stressful. But but, you know, the truth prevails. It has to. And and that's the the legal system of this country is the backbone of our country. If if the courts do not just because they're a large corporation does not give them the right to go and bend the rules whenever they wish to bend the rules.
And and that's what I'm very shocked with is that I've seen it, witnessed it for a number of years where where the large law firms have the clout, where the small the smaller firms do not have the same clout as large firms with the courts Yes. Whether it be provincial or federal. In this particular case, all I'm asking for the court to do is a rule and and on the evidence that we've compiled that definitely shows that Bell Canada went and altered and fabricated the evidence in 2016, which cost me my business and my shareholders millions of millions of dollars.
Speaker 0: And when you say it cost you your business, what is the status right now, Douglas, of Mediateube? Mediateube, basically,
Speaker 1: all it does now is go to court. You know, we have not been developing technology now for over ten years.
Speaker 0: And that's what you wanna be doing. You don't wanna be in a courtroom. You wanna be in a lab.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We're a technology company. Right. We were, and now we've been deprived of that. We've been fighting Bell for over ten years to get to the truth.
Speaker 0: Do you have any allies on this matter? You showed me a a letter that you, wrote to the justice minister, Sean Fraser
Speaker 1: Yesterday.
Speaker 0: Did, any thing come of that?
Speaker 1: Well, I wrote to. I I wrote to to the minister Okay. And I also wrote to the federal court administration because they're they're they're not abiding by their own rules. You know, we followed the rules. They're not following their own rules.
So we we to the court, and we wrote to the federal court, and we wrote to the minister to ask him. The rules are very clear. I didn't make them. It's their rules. I'm just asking them to follow their own rules.
Speaker 0: Douglas, in the big picture, and I'm just editorializing here, when you compare Canada to, say, The US, which is more of an entrepreneurial nation Mhmm. I think, those in power in Canada, be it the politicians, the legal system, they have more of an embrace of oligopolies and even monopolies, whether we're talking telcos, liquor boards, than you would see in The US. This would be antitrust stuff south of the border. Is that what's going on? Is it's that you know, as George Carlin once famously said, it's a big club and you're not in it?
Speaker 1: That's correct. That's exactly what the problem is that we're having right here in Canada.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: They're they employ over 40,000 people. Yep. You know, they're they're very well connected politically. So when they got caught with alteration of court evidence, the courts have to stand back a little bit and say, jeez, that small little guy against the big guy, they sort of favor the big guy and the big law firms. Yeah.
And that's exactly what's been happening to us, and that's why I wrote those letters yesterday. Okay. I was asking him to follow the rules.
Speaker 0: And and, of course, Douglas, I have to do my due diligence. I have to reach out to Bell, but I'm almost 100% certain. I yeah. Well, I was just gonna say, based on other stories that have nothing to do with litigation, Bell, which has an entire media relations department, they don't relate to the media. It's just they they put their heads in the sand.
Secondly, if they did get back to me, I'm sure it would be one terse sentence saying because it's before the courts Mhmm. We have no comment.
Speaker 1: Well, they brought the action, so Yes. It's their action. They should be able to tell you what the action's all about. Yeah. They brought it.
They sued me.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I would love to hear their side of the story. I don't think we're gonna get it. Any idea when you are back in court?
Speaker 1: I have no idea. That that's why, again, why I wrote these letters. I'm asking the court to rule. I've been asking the court. I've I've wrote to them in August, September, October.
Yes. Or sorry, September. I just wrote to them again yesterday. They they they they just will not respond. Period.
Speaker 0: And what feedback are you getting from your shareholders?
Speaker 1: Some of them are very frustrated. Some of them obviously continue to support the costs. Yeah. You know, they they've been, we have a great group, in Kingston, Ontario that has been phenomenal in supporting us. Okay.
We you know, it's it's a little frustrating to some of the shareholders. They they think because Bell is so big, we'll never win this. And I keep telling them the truth has to prevail, and and the evidence that we presented to the court is rock solid.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: So the the court has to rule on what's been presented to the court to show that Bell had altered in 2016 the court documents, and it's well documented.
Speaker 0: It's a fascinating story. One last thing, Douglas. Is there anything relevant to this matter that you feel I might have missed?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think it'll be interesting if if you can get Bell to to explain, first of all, why they sued me for contempt of court
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And and and why they haven't answered the court. They're in default. Yeah. Know, You publicly traded company, and they're not they haven't recorded anything or reported any of this on either side of the border because they're also publicly traded in The States.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: So, you you you know, the SEC, nothing. I checked this morning. Not one single thing. And this is a large, large risk for the shareholders of BCE, who I happen to be a shareholder of BCE as well.
Speaker 0: Right. Okay.
Speaker 1: And they won't even respond to that.
Speaker 0: Well, Douglas, please stay in touch. And folks, we're gonna continue to follow this case. I I think this is just an egregious example of corporate bullyism. You know, and it's kind of ironic too, isn't it? Come February, you will see all those touchy feely ads from Bell, you know, let's talk, you know, addressing mental illness.
Oh, you know, just reaching out and and and and being friendly and bringing about resolves to those in crisis. Well, you know what, Bell? Let's talk. When I reach out to you, have somebody engage in an interview with me as Douglas Lloyd has done. I wanna hear your story.
I don't think I'm gonna get it, and I think I know why. For Rebel News, I'm David Demenzoyd Menzies. Folks, I know you love it when rebel news tells you the other side of the story, but the fact is we need your help. You're not gonna hear the Douglas Lloyd story on a Bell Media property, and, for good reason, not to mention the fact that Bell Media, like all mainstream media, gets funded by the Mark Carney liberals. We don't take a nickel of government funding nor would we accept it if it was ever offered.
So can you do me a favor? Can you go to rebelfieldreports.com? That's rebelfieldreports.com. And if you're able to, kindly make a donation.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Douglas Lloyd is the CEO of MediaTube, a small Canadian technology company. In 2012, MediaTube developed a breakthrough product that Lloyd says would’ve “changed how the world watches television.” https://rebelne.ws/484EyDK
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm driving 11 hours to Edgewood, British Columbia, where Rebel News reporter Drea Humphrey is covering a critical situation at Universal Ostrich Farms. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency is poised to cull 400 healthy ostriches, despite their exposure to avian flu nearly 250 days ago. The birds are vital for research on diseases, including avian flu and COVID-19, and the CFIA refuses to test their health before proceeding with the cull. This could jeopardize important research efforts.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Rebel reinforcements headed to Universal Ostrich Farms Chief Reporter @SheilaGunnReid is headed from Alberta to rural British Columbia, where @RebelNews_CA reporter @DreaHumphrey is embedded as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is expected to carry out a cull of 400 healthy ostriches at any moment. This morning, I'm making an 11-hour drive with a home-built micro trailer on the road to Edgewood, British Columbia. That's where Rebel News reporter Drea Humphrey is embedded at Universal Ostrich Farms, the site of an ongoing battle between farmers, their supporters and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency over the fate of 400 birds. Drea has been working around the clock as the CFIA is set to impose a cull on the flock of healthy ostriches — all because the birds were exposed to avian flu approximately 250 days ago. Now, the birds are healthy, but the CFIA refuses to test them to make sure they're healthy, or sick, before they kill them. The worst part? These are not birds that are for human consumption, they're not even birds meant for cowboy boots. These birds are being used in research for diseases like avian flu, and even COVID-19. If these birds are killed, that research dies, too.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sheila Gunn Reed reports she's headed to Edgewood BC to Universal Ostrich Farm to assist Drea Humphrey, as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is set to impose a call on 400 healthy ostriches because the birds were exposed to avian flu two hundred and fifty days ago. The birds are healthy; Canadian Food Inspection Agency refuses to test them to ensure they are healthy or sick before they kill them. And the worst part is that these are not birds fit for human consumption. They’re not birds meant for cowboy boots. These are birds used in research for diseases like avian flu and COVID nineteen. RCMP descended on the farm this morning; Drea has been sleeping on the ground in tent. I’ll swing through Calgary to pick up Starlink. If this call happens, it’s a dark day for property rights, for Canadian agriculture, for science. To help, go to savetheostriches.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sheila Gunn Reed for Rebel News. It's about nine, forty five mountain time. I'm in my yard right now, but it won't be for long. I've got an eleven hour drive ahead of me. As you can see behind me, I'm loaded up.
I've got my little home built micro trailer project with me. I'm headed to Edgewood BC to Universal Ostrich Farm to help out my friend, Drea Humphrey, has been working around the clock as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is set to impose a call on 400 healthy ostriches because the birds were exposed to avian flu approximately two hundred and fifty days ago. Now the birds are healthy. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency refuses to test them to make sure they're healthy or sick before they kill them. And the worst part about all of this is that these are not birds fit for human consumption.
They're not even birds meant for cowboy boots. These are birds that are used in research for diseases like avian flu and even COVID nineteen. And if these birds are killed, that research is dead too. But the RCMP descended on the farm this morning, and Drea has been working quite literally around the clock. From what I understand, she's been sleeping on the ground in a tent, and I think I can help her maybe give her a warm, dry place to sleep.
Maybe we'll switch spots. I know that she's doing all of her own camera work. She's also struggling with upload speed, so I'm going to swing through Calgary before I head to Edgewood to pick up the company Starlink. This is a dark day for property rights, for Canadian agriculture, for science if this call is set to go forward, and it appears to be imminent. But it is important that if this call happens, it is documented so that everyone can know what the Canadian government did one more time in the name of science.
If you'd like to help with our trip to support Dre's journalism and send a message to the government that killing 400 healthy ostriches will not save one life from avian flu, please go to savetheostriches.com.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
This morning, I'm making an 11-hour drive with a home-built micro trailer on the road to Edgewood, British Columbia. Visit Rebel News for more on this story ► https://rebelne.ws/4nNp8IL
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Support Rebel News coverage and follow the latest developments! ► https://SaveTheOstriches.com.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
WATCH: Tensions are running high as authorities converge on Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, B.C. ahead of the expected cull of nearly 400 ostriches. https://t.co/1mXoHpEHqw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officers line up as tensions rise between police and supporters outside. The crowd speaks about animal welfare and political fault lines, while referencing CFIA and local decisions. The transcript preserves key lines: "Not to say the birds don't matter. 400 lives of beautiful animals that are no reason to die. Infected with the flu four years ago." "You can step out of this right now. You can just step out. What is it? A job and a paycheck? What's that for your life and your heart and your soul?" "They're a private organization. What private organization deserves this kind of protection? We killed them all." Another speaker questions leadership and accountability: "You think our prime minister not returning call[s] when they wanna talk about these guys?" The exchange ends with calls for action and a claim of impending firings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here. Yeah. Let's take a look here. So we've got officers lining over here, and, of course, tensions are high with the supporters as well. Let's hear some of what they have to say.
Speaker 1: Not to say the birds don't matter. 400 lives of beautiful animals that are no reason to die. Infected with the flu four years ago. Yeah. You're part of us.
You're good. You're fruitful. The Americans are the same. You're on the wrong side. Thanks for watching.
Speaker 2: Can say you just just like the regional district did. Just like either way rentals did. They thought it was wrong, and they backed out. They stopped. And you still can't too.
Just say no to the CFIA or
Speaker 0: Look at the many officers lined up here.
Speaker 2: Hopeless. Feel sorry for
Speaker 1: you guys today. Well, I do. I'm
Speaker 2: hungry. This is not what
Speaker 1: we want for Canada. We
Speaker 2: know it's not what we want for Canada.
Speaker 1: You think you think our prime minister not returning call calls when they wanna talk about these guys?
Speaker 2: You can step out of this right now. You can just step out. What is it? A job and a paycheck? What's that for your life and your heart and your soul?
Oh my gosh. Being paid. I'm wrong. This is
Speaker 1: wrong. You feel bad. These guys are gonna get fired.
Speaker 2: You guys are history in the making, then you have a chance to do the right thing today. No.
Speaker 1: They're a private organization. What private organization deserves this kind of protection? We killed them all.
Speaker 2: See you guys soon.
Speaker 1: They're not protecting law. Like I said, there's no there's no longer
reSee.it AI Summary
Rebel News conducted a four-day undercover investigation at the Canada-U.S. border, revealing a surge in illegal crossings, primarily involving migrants of Haitian origin. Local resident Jerry Miller reported increased suspicious activity, linking it to the end of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians in the U.S. The investigation documented 34 individuals crossing illegally, with evidence of organized smuggling operations, including discarded personal items and frequent vehicle drop-offs. Despite increased surveillance, resources for border enforcement remain stretched.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Criminal border crossings exposed Over a four-day undercover investigation, Rebel News reporters @ThevoiceAlexa Lavoie and @LincolnMJay uncovered alarming evidence of ongoing criminal activity at the border between Canada and the United States. Illegal crossings have surged — and our cameras caught some of it happening in real time. Stationed in Champlain, New York and Franklin, Quebec, we documented how organized criminal networks are smuggling illegal migrants from one country to the other, profiting handsomely in the process. This investigation began when Jerry Miller, a long-time resident of Churubusco, NY, contacted Rebel News after noticing a spike in suspicious activity on his private property and that of his neighbours'. Miller had previously spoken with our team seven months ago during a prior investigation into smuggling networks that openly promoted their services on social media. That earlier work revealed Churubusco as a known hotspot for illegal crossings. According to Miller, unlike last year, the majority of migrants are now heading into Canada, and many appear to be of Haitian origin. He believes this trend is linked to Donald Trump’s decision to end TPS (Temporary Protected Status) for more than 500,000 Haitians living in the U.S. On the ground, we found discarded backpacks, clothing, food, shoes, and even tools strewn across residents’ properties. Among the items recovered were Haitian ID cards, confirming at least some of the migrants' nationalities. On the first day, we installed a trail camera in a suspected high-traffic crossing zone. While we spent the night actively monitoring the area, our hidden camera recorded a group of 23 individuals illegally crossing the border under the cover of darkness. Over the next two nights, the area was suddenly swarming with helicopters and drones — an unusual level of surveillance. Whether this heightened activity was a direct response to the previous night's successful crossing remains unclear. On the fourth night, the camera captured yet another group — 11 migrants, including children — making their way across. At one point, a child appeared visibly frightened by the border patrol floodlight mounted just above the Rebel camera setup. In total, 34 people were filmed illegally crossing the border — at one single location over just four nights. And that’s only one small section of the 523-kilometre border between Quebec and New York State. Jerry Miller also described how taxis, Ubers, and other suspicious vehicles frequently drop off or pick up individuals in the area. What’s unfolding appears to be a highly coordinated smuggling operation, and the frequency of these events is only increasing. Hunter Robare, who lives on the same road as Jerry Miller, explained that illegal activity occurs almost daily in the area. Robare has installed multiple trail cameras throughout the woods and on his property, capturing footage of numerous illegal crossings. As he put it, “Who really knows who’s crossing?” While Mark Carney recently announced additional funding for border services, resources for the RCMP remain stretched thin — due to both the length of the border and the rising criminal activity taking place along it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US-Canada border in areas like Franklin, Canada, and Churubusko, USA, is experiencing increased illegal migrant crossings. Landowners report garbage and trails on their properties. Investigations revealed TikTok videos advertising illegal crossings and a spike in crossings recently. People are observed discarding clothes to change their appearance.
Trail cameras captured footage of groups, including children, crossing with luggage. One group numbered 23 people. Discarded items included tools and a pink vibrator. An ID from Port Au Prince, Haiti, was found. Some residents believe drones may be used to survey the area before crossings. Taxi drivers have been seen dropping off and picking up migrants. Documents found revealed individuals from Miami, Florida, possibly connected to human trafficking.
The RCMP is monitoring the situation, with helicopters patrolling the area. Most migrants are reportedly Haitian, possibly due to deportation concerns. Social media is used to identify safe crossing locations. In four days, 34 people were caught in one spot. The border between New York and Quebec is 523 kilometers long.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, it's everyday groups coming across. There was a group that I'm running through, nine of them.
Speaker 1: I think we find finally an ID. Total price. 80. 500,000 Haitians living in The US, setting them up for potential deportation.
Speaker 0: So they're coming from Miami. Majority of it is Haitian. We'll strengthen our border security with thousand thousand more CBSA officers.
Speaker 1: In this report, we will show you that the border between United States and Canada is being flooded with illegal migrants. We've got the proof, and we are going to show you. Alexis Laboire here alongside my colleague, Lincoln Jay, reporting from Chrebusco, USA, a town that sits directly on the Canadian border where illegal migrants are pouring into Canada and The US. While mainstream media focus on legal ports of entry, the reality here in Franklin, Canada and Chirubusko, USA is very different. Illegal crossings are getting out of hand and landowners are fed up.
Garbage, clothing and all sorts of items are being dumped in their fields, and trails are appearing everywhere. In this report, we will show you clear evidence that our country is not safe, from criminals who are actively helping people cross the border illegally. We will show you highly organized operations designed to get people across the border without being caught. If you want to help us continue this investigation, you can chip in at guardtheborder.com.
Speaker 2: About seven months ago, we came across videos on TikTok advertising illegal crossings from Canada into The US. We were able to locate the farm featured in the videos. After speaking with landowners, we learned that the area is a known hotspot for illegal crossings. The properties along this road sit right beside the Canadian border. Last week, we received a call from one of the property owners featured in our previous report, Jerry, who told us that the number of crossings has recently spiked.
Alexa and I just spent the last three days investigating the area on both the American side and the Canadian side. Follow along with us on our journey.
Speaker 1: You mentioned that now you are seeing more people crossing into Canada?
Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. We're seeing a lot more.
Speaker 1: How often?
Speaker 3: Oh my god. I'd say at least sometimes two or three times a week that they've been coming and bringing them up and dropping them off. And then one night, they're all mowing that field, and there was a group that come running through nine of them. The last one was a woman running with a baby. They're throwing their garbage all over the place.
And and then they'll change their clothes just in case they did get their picture taken. They're in a different set of clothes. I know the border patrol and the mounted police have been working pretty close.
Speaker 1: And so they don't want to fit the description that they are giving like a like a blue jacket.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1: So this is one of the example of stuff that they are throwing away when they try to cross. Here we have a pair of pants, a pajama. Oh, a razor. But what is that?
Speaker 4: Oh,
Speaker 1: That's tools. That's pretty surprising that someone will actually try to cross illegally with like all kind of tools and electricity test tester and a razor.
Speaker 3: The first time I ever seen tools. Clothes mostly. Two
Speaker 4: backpacks and I mowed over there the other day. Yeah? Right in the hay.
Speaker 1: And did you open the bag? You
Speaker 4: see open, any it was full of clothes.
Speaker 1: Did you see any ID or No.
Speaker 4: I don't see none of that. Border Patrol took one of them and he poked all through it. They're going mostly nail going down, but you do still have some coming back. Mhmm. But I don't know.
Speaker 1: So you saw more people going to Canada?
Speaker 4: Sometimes one night it was what nine in one minivan and I think eight or nine in the next. Another nine. Two one night.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I
Speaker 4: got off at the end of the road up to his place.
Speaker 1: And what time mainly you see some action?
Speaker 4: I don't know. It's been coming through and just about dark. Yeah. It'd be the most action most of the time. I haven't seen nothing the last couple of nights, but usually Friday night, Thursday night, Saturday night.
Speaker 1: We are here on the ground to try to catch one of them crossing illegally, either crossing to Canada or to The US. And we will show you how easy it is.
Speaker 2: So we're gonna put the trail cam. It's somewhere along the border here. Canada's right on the other side. So we'll have the camera on one spot where it detects any motion, it'll start recording. And we're gonna go to another spot and use our eyes to see if we see any people crossing.
So let's set it up.
Speaker 1: Perfect.
Speaker 2: Literally right where we installed it, there's a border patrol camera on the other side. There's a RCMP camera. There's luggage there from somebody who's recently crossed, we would assume. Pictures. Obviously, people are crossing at this spot.
We'll see if the camera picks anything up.
Speaker 1: It's currently 10PM, and we are at the border. And we are going to be up all night until probably 8AM to monitor what's going on and to look if we are not seeing anybody or cars coming here to drop people off or picking up people. And, we'll see what we will see tonight.
Speaker 2: Well, the sun is officially rising. It is just after 5AM. We spent all night in the car camping out, looking for people crossing. Visibility, very tough, but we tried. One of us would sleep for an hour.
The other one would be on lookout, and we would just keep rotating like that and literally spent all night in the car.
Speaker 1: What we would do now is to fly the drone, take some shot, going to verify our trail camera. So during all this time, we thought that nothing really happened during the night. But surprise, our trail camera catches something. It's not clear where the people are heading to, but watch the full footage. Well, it's obvious that this operation is well organized.
We counted 23 of them with lots of luggage, walking directly in the border, going we don't know which country yet.
Speaker 0: I have seen them coming from Canada into The US, but I have noticed just recently them going back. But still to this day, it's, you know, groups coming across, but it's every day. I mean, we have cameras, you know, up and down the road here. I have hunting cameras in the woods that I hunt. There's children involved and all that.
So it's it's a little nerve racking like you had spoke with us. You know, we had the the woman and a child here. We've had them ring the door bell. Every time you're in the woods, you know, you you tend to find clothes or remnants of them coming across fairly recently.
Speaker 1: Okay. I think we find finally an ID. It's in French. So that mean that's probably from '80. Port Au Prince.
'80. So this woman is from Port Au Prince in '80. And if you are looking, she was a student, and she got her promotion in twenty twenty four in '80.
Speaker 0: If you ride around here, you can see them leaving things behind, and it it could be pretty nerve racking, you know, just being at home and you have a group of people walking down the road, you don't know their intentions, you know. Not saying they're bad people, but
Speaker 1: So we really find everything you would not expect. A pink vibrator.
Speaker 3: You
Speaker 2: think that's a do you think that's a Canadian chopper?
Speaker 3: I think so. Because usually ours is a white and a white and some green on it.
Speaker 2: It's look, it's circling.
Speaker 3: But I know
Speaker 2: It's circling here.
Speaker 3: I know the Canadian has been flying the border a whole lot more than I I ever seen them. Well, I'm sure that the helicopter not been able better to pick them up with the helicopter and follow them because you up in the air, you can see a lot better than what you can do on the ground. Mhmm. You know? And the drones, I don't know what if they're drones for the government or if they're drones for the underground, I don't you know?
Speaker 1: Because you think that maybe it's also drone from the people to just surround the perimeter to see if it's safe to cross?
Speaker 3: That's in the back of my mind, that's what I'm wondering.
Speaker 2: Alright, guys. It's just past midnight on our second day of border reporting. Alexis behind the camera right now. We haven't seen any activity. We haven't even seen any cars drive down this road.
We think the reason why is because there's a ton of drones in the sky. Is that because 23 people crossed last night, and now, you know, they're thinking we gotta patrol this area, make sure that doesn't happen again? Who knows? But what we do know is that we haven't seen anything. Last night, we saw a car drive down here and drove out really quickly, which, you know, can only mean probably one thing that they're involved with human trafficking of some sort.
Just down the road here, to your left, there's a little side road. And on that side road is just about where the car pulled up, and that's also the road where we found the documents of the woman from Haiti.
Speaker 0: Yeah. There's definitely an increase. Like I said, there was that pause, I think, right around the election where it seemed to slow down, but to me, it's it's grown and it keeps growing. Mhmm. It's no longer, you know, one here, one there.
It's it's every day.
Speaker 1: You actually mentioned to me that you saw also taxi driver coming and dropping people off and picking people up.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. The taxis, a lot of times, they'll either come up to the gate there or else they'll drive right up in here and pick them up or drop them off. There's taxi. There's the Hoover I think Hooverville.
Hoover? Yeah. They're a little bit cheaper than a taxi. And they they come right up and well, matter of fact, a couple weeks ago, there's a Hoover van come up and drop people off and go right back out.
Speaker 1: And what the US border patrol are doing when there is a taxi driver coming in? Are they arresting them?
Speaker 3: If they can catch them with them in the car, they'll they will arrest them.
Speaker 1: Hello. How are guys doing? We are reporter. We are reporting on what's going on. Any activity today?
Speaker 0: Nothing yet.
Speaker 1: Another group of 11 people crossing illegally with children, Children who got scared because I think it's one of the light of the border patrol camera who actually went off and the child you can see on the footage got really scared of it. But they used that path, and we will try to see if there is any trail going into Canada. Let's go. You can see clearly the footprint on the ground going towards this direction. They, again, dropped all their luggage behind them and we are going to check a little bit what we can find here.
Obviously, this is men clothes. Oh, there is stuff inside. Oh, we have some paper. What it's written on it? I don't want to break it because it's all wet.
Speaker 2: His phone number is
Speaker 1: My name is Jorge St. Juste. My driver is my address is Miami, Florida.
Speaker 2: $2,000 cash to buy a
Speaker 1: 2,000 to buy a Suzu Grand Vitaro 02/2011. The rest when I give them the car. Moise, Asians.
Speaker 2: What does this mean though? It's why my my address? So they're coming from Miami.
Speaker 1: They are coming from Lauderhill, Florida. It's two different person. We have Jose Saint Just and Noise Jean Houdes, two people from Florida who was probably traveling together. The temporary protection status that they receive from the Biden administration, I think it's more than 500,000 Asians that have that at the moment who will be expired soon. All random car are coming here to drop people off.
Sometimes it can be taxi, sometimes just random car and also really creepy people. One of them told us that one of the guy who was driving a car had a teardrop tattoo just right there with, like, full of tattoo all over his body. And the resident in question who was taking the picture asked, what are you doing here since it's private property? And he literally admitted that he was dropping people off here. People are traveling from far away just to come and cross illegally here.
This receipt is from Kansas City. Can you believe that? This is pretty far away.
Speaker 2: That's Canada. You can see people have been using this to cross. It's luggage right there. It's luggage further down there. There's endless ways and paths and trails that you can take into Canada.
We do know that the RCMP is monitoring this situation. I mean, they have to be aware that people are crossing in this area. You've seen the helicopters flying around. Those are RCMP helicopters. We can almost certainly confirm that.
And check out this interaction I had with an RCMP officer who was following us because he thought we were up to something suspicious. And he was gonna pull us over, but we're approaching the US border, and he kinda just stopped. And we stopped, and I got out of the car and spoke with him. Check it out. So the reason I was following you is just because it's an Ontario license plate that you know about what's happening here.
Yeah.
Speaker 4: And then you were We
Speaker 2: were traveling really, really slow, so that kind of increased my suspicion about you. This helicopter is currently doing circles around us right now. I think it thinks that we're gonna cross. I said that the RCMP are, you know, investigating illegal crossings. And what do you know?
I'm flying the drone. I got spooked because I thought it was people crossing, but it was two RCMP, officers. And, we had the drone hovering, just seeing what they were doing. They get back in the car. They start driving, and I couldn't believe my eyes.
They went into the ditch. Half of the car is in the ditch, so they're gonna need a tow truck or something to get that out. Are you okay?
Speaker 1: You okay? You okay? Okay. We are currently in the opposite side of Churubusko in The US. Now we are in Canada in the county of Franklin, and we just spoke with the owner of this land that is literally the opposite side.
If you can see right there, this is the windmills where is the hot spot, the other side. We spoke with the owner who actually told us that last year, people were kind of crossing both side. But this year, what he was seeing is, like, mainly people are crossing into Canada. Mainly Asians who are crossing because probably they are scared of being deported because of Trump's policy. So we have a real issue with bugs over here.
Really a real issue. But if you can see at the end of the road, it is USA. So it's really easy for people who wants to jump in Canada or in The US to just use this clear path to cross over illegally. And this is one of the example of many, many places in our border where people can just jump in, jump out. And now I'm going to go out because if I'm not doing that, the bugs would destroy me.
Speaker 0: Recently, you know, I haven't seen, you know, Spanish or any anything like that. It's majority of it is, Haitian.
Speaker 1: Do you have any concern that your address is actually circulating in all kind of groups telling them this is the spot where to cross?
Speaker 3: Oh, I'm sure, you know, that because here, all the way down to my neighbor here and the other guy, it's it's pretty much
Speaker 0: open going for them. The illegals are using social media just as much as you and I. They're using that social media to find their way across and tell the others that this is a safe place to come across and such. To me, it's just being swept under the rug until, you know, you guys came up and are putting in the work to figure out what what the real problem is here.
Speaker 1: 34 people, four days. This is what we caught in one spot. The border between New York and Quebec, it's 523 kilometers long. Just imagine the number of people who are crossing over this long border. Thanks for watching.
I hope you enjoy our investigation on the ground. We will continue to follow this story closely. And who knows, maybe our trail camera will cut some more suspicious activity, so stay tuned.
Speaker 2: And if you wanna check out our previous reports in this area and Vermont, visit our website, guardtheborder.com. And if you appreciate the honest, independent journalism that we're providing, consider making a donation through that same website. That's guardtheborder.com. Thanks for watching.
Speaker 1: Again, the website is guardtheborder.com. If you appreciate our work and you want to support our investigation on the ground, please consider make a donation at guardtheborder.com.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Rebel News will continue monitoring the situation — but we need your help to keep doing this work. If you support independent journalism, consider donating today at http://GuardTheBorder.com.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
On the ground, we found discarded backpacks, clothing, food, shoes, and even tools strewn across residents’ properties. Among the items recovered were Haitian ID cards, confirming at least some of the migrants' nationalities. https://rebelne.ws/3U0yC6s
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
At the 2025 Toronto Pride parade, promoted as a 'family-friendly' celebration, widespread nudity and fetish costumes in front of children triggered intense controversy. https://t.co/9Wtvp6BArd
Video Transcript AI Summary
People wear dog masks for various reasons, often related to "pup play," which falls under the BDSM umbrella. In pup play, one person acts like a dog, and another acts as their handler or owner. The speaker believes this phenomenon isn't necessarily growing in popularity, but rather, more people are openly expressing it. This behavior has always existed and is not exclusive to the gay community; straight people also engage in it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you explain a little bit why people are wearing mask, the dog mask? Well,
Speaker 1: it depends on every person who wears it. A lot of it has to with what they call putt play. It's basically part of the BDSM, like, umbrella, I guess. And it's one person may act a little bit like a dog, and then the other one is the the handler or the owner in a sense.
Speaker 0: Because I think it's growing in popularity. I see popularity. I see I see more and more and more people.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's something that grows in popularity. I just think that a lot more people let themselves, express it and don't hide it as much.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Because it's always been there, it's always been part of, like, even straight people do it. It's not just a gay thing.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
FULL REPORT by @ThevoiceAlexa: rebelne.ws/4kpJvcK
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
WATCH: @SheilaGunnReid breaks down the mainstream media tantrum that unfolded behind the scenes at the federal leaders' debate. https://t.co/sVCS6evyC0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Following a debate, Sheila from "the inside" reports "unhinged buffoonery," including an unprovoked Hill Times reporter yelling at Ezra Levant. She claims CBC complained about their questions, resulting in revoked accreditation, though not for the Hill Times reporter.
Sheila felt unsafe due to escalating tension after the announcement of canceled scrums, for which "everybody unhinged" blamed them, despite their professionalism. She says left-wing journalists from Ricochet screamed at Ezra, and Lincoln was shoved. Sheila admits raising her voice in response to being heckled and abused.
Outside, Lincoln was allegedly assaulted, and the team is separated. Sheila accuses other journalists of misreporting events and lying. She says Rebel News is only allowed fifteen minutes every four years due to the parliamentary press gallery.
According to Sheila, the other journalists couldn't tolerate them even for that short time and displayed hostility, enabled by government funding. She says their success came from politely asking questions, unlike the other journalists. She says the other journalists witnessed their mistreatment but didn't report it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have Sheila from the inside to join us and tell us what the heck is going on in the background of these debates. Hey, Sheila. What is happening?
Speaker 1: I've never seen such a bunch of unhinged buffoonery in my entire life as I've just seen unfold in this place. I don't know if you guys saw the footage that unhinged Hill Times reporter Yeah. In his Hillary Clinton account suit, yelling at Ezra Levant, completely unprovoked. Ezra was telling him, stay calm, calm down, and, you know, CBC complaining that we asked questions, and so then they were reporting that we had our accreditation revoked. We didn't you know who didn't have his accreditation revoked?
The Hill Times weirdo over there. It's so tense in here that I'm frankly worried about my safety. And I'll tell you why. Because Alexa, this place, by the way, exploded. I'll I'll get to what happened outside in a second.
This place exploded when it was announced that the the scrums would be canceled, and everybody unhinged blamed us even though we've been the victims of their unhinged behavior this whole time. We've conducted ourselves with nothing but professionalism, and the comportment of the individuals here has been less than desirable, I would say. And I knew because we we sort of had confirmation from the inside before. We knew, and I just I sent a message to everybody saying, be ready with your cameras. This place is gonna pop off, and they are gonna blame us.
That's instantly what happened. Some left wing journalists, subsidized journalists from Ricochet start screaming at Ezra. People shoving Lincoln, like, shoving him. Like Shush. It wasn't like a bump, like, physically smacking into him.
What? Just Just some like, absolute mayhem. The police should have intervened. I don't know why they didn't. I got fed up.
I might have raised my voice a little bit. I wasn't yelling, but I said, you know, we have been heckled, berated, derided, subject to abuse. We had paper thrown at us the entire time that we've been here. They're running nonstop stories on us, treating us like, and they're they're acting like the victims in here. It is the most astounding bizarre thing.
What happened to Ezra earlier? It's four minutes of video that happened on camera. So you could see the behavior of the other journalist, and they're still blaming him for the scrum being canceled. The scrum was canceled because we asked questions these people don't have the bravery to ask. That's what happened.
Yes. And they're they're treating us like absolute pariahs. Now Alexa Guillaume or sorry. Guillaume's behind camera. Alexa Lincoln and Alexa Lincoln David, they went outside.
And Lincoln calls me and tells me that he's been assaulted. The team has been assaulted out there. Again, this place is wriggling with the journalists. No one no one will have footage, I'm sure. There's cops everywhere.
Why are my guys getting manhandled out there? They're not allowed back in. All their stuff is in here. We're separated from each other. It's absolute chaos.
And the journalists in here are the true victims. We've been subject to their bad behavior the whole time, and they're blaming us because the debates commission doesn't have the bravery to uphold journalistic freedom when differing opinions are in the room.
Speaker 0: Well and that's what I think it it all boils down to is that we had a team there prepared, ready, acting professional, looking professional when some of these the counterparts were looking, you know, like street people adjacent. And then the entire legacy media and laptop class had a complete meltdown over the fact that we were there asking some questions. It is absolute insanity that this is the state of the media landscape here in Canada.
Speaker 1: And it's yeah.
Speaker 2: We at Rebel News are allowed fifteen minutes every four years to do this because the press gallery, the parliamentary press gallery keeps us out. So they couldn't even tolerate us. They couldn't even keep their good manners for fifteen minutes of four years. Canada, this is a changing moment in our country. You are seeing the way they behave towards us.
You are seeing the hostility and the aggression that they're showing towards us. This is media that's funded by the government, and the government does nothing to stop them. Nothing. As a matter of fact, they enable them. The government enables this kind of behavior.
Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Look at Jagged saying
Speaker 1: They get preferential treatment because of how they treat us. That's what's happening. Oh. So this is a room of, I don't know, a 50 journalists. Everything they've reported on us was absolutely wrong, save for the independent media.
Things that were caught on video, they reported inaccurately knowing that we would publish the video that would debunk them because they just didn't care. They just would rather lie than allow the public to believe their lion eyes. I've never seen anything like it. Like I said, it was absolute buffoonery here.
Speaker 0: So what's next? What's happening now? Everybody's kind of separated. What's going on?
Speaker 2: Where where are you right now?
Speaker 1: Like, where are you? Describe where you are. So this the media snake pit is right in front of me, and I'm standing in front of the place where the leaders would come out. I I don't know why I have I don't know why I have the blur on my thing. I I it's too late to fix it, but this is would be where their microphone would be for them to take questions from the journalists.
And it's it's so funny because they're saying, well, you sued to get there and you made them a credit five journalists. Yeah. But none of you got out of your chairs, you guys, and came up into the line. Like, what was the secret to our success? Politely walking into the line.
Like that. Trade secrets.
Speaker 0: There there they are.
Speaker 1: That's just some free advice, you guys, from your four years of baseball. Get out of the line and wait and have a question to ask. That's literally all we did. We didn't fuss. We didn't fight.
There's not a single person in here who's who could rightfully say that we were aggressive. Now they may lie and say that we were, but we were the receive we were on the receiving end of some pretty intense being all week long, and we conducted ourselves, I mean, Drea led by example with, dignity and resolve.
Speaker 2: A %. Just just the the picture of decorum and the most, the most important question to Jagmeet Singh, and we all saw how he treated her. We all saw how he treated her. It was the it was the defining moment of yesterday's debate, and it trickled over till today because they couldn't risk another shaming like they had to take yesterday for their poor behavior.
Speaker 1: You know, I said to well, it was I was just raising my voice to a group of journalists, and I said, you guys all saw how we were treated this whole time. You saw that they were yelling at us, heckling us, jeering at us, throwing stuff at us. You saw, and you didn't report any of it. You just pretended like it didn't happen, and there's Judy Trent chuckling to herself. She knew.
They all knew.
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Then when they get killed, they blame us because they can't behave themselves.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
.@MaximeBernier joins @TuckerCarlson to talk about his arrest in Manitoba, Canada for holding an outdoor political rally. PREVIOUS STORY: https://rebelne.ws/3vebG4Y
Video Transcript AI Summary
Maxime Bernier, leader of the People's Party of Canada and former cabinet secretary, was arrested for protesting lockdowns outdoors. Bernier claims the arrest was political repression, as he is the only political leader in Canada speaking against the authoritarian lockdowns and stay-at-home orders.
Prior to his arrival in Manitoba, the province's premier threatened to empty his wallet if he came, signaling a desire to avoid discussion about his policies. Bernier states he was arrested after speaking to supporters about his values and the next election, with authorities citing COVID regulations. He spent eight hours in jail.
Bernier asserts that another candidate from his party was jailed in Nova Scotia for holding a freedom rally. He likens the situation in Canada to that of China, but says he will continue to fight for freedom with his words and plans to return to Manitoba.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Political figures in Canada, a man called Maxine Bernier, went to a protest against lockdowns outdoors and was arrested by the regime for doing it.
Speaker 1: Afternoon, sir. Yes. Yes. With the RCMP. Yeah.
I can get you step out the vehicle. I'm gonna place you under arrest right now. Yeah. Right now, you're under arrest under the provincial health orders. K.
So if you could just put your hands behind your back, place towards the vehicle. K. Put give me one hand here. I'll get you to stay in the vehicle. Okay?
Thank you. Your other hand. Do you have any weapons or anything on you, sir?
Speaker 2: Weapon? No. No weapon. Only Anything
Speaker 1: on you that's gonna hurt or anything like Sorry? Anything on you that's gonna hurt me or anything like that?
Speaker 2: No. No. Anything would hurt you. Only my words. Only my philosophy.
Only what I believe in.
Speaker 0: Only what I believe in. Maxine Bernier is the leader of the People's Party of Canada. He's a former cabinet secretary in the Canadian government. He joins us tonight. Mister Bernier, thanks so much for coming on.
It's from an American perspective, it's remarkable that the government, the Trudeau government, would arrest its political opponent for complaining about its policies. That's what it seems like from our perspective. What's your view?
Speaker 2: You're you're absolutely right, Tucker. I'm very pleased to be with you, very pleased to be free. But, yes, you know, I'm doing a tour across the country to speak against these authoritarian lockdowns and stay at home order, and I'm the only political leader in Canada who is speaking against that. And in that tour, I I had planned to be in Manitoba. And just before coming to Manitoba, the premier of that province, threatened me.
He said in a press conference the day before I arrived there that I was not welcome. And if I'm coming to Manitoba, he said that my my he will empty my wallet. So so he doesn't want to have any discussion about his policies. And, actually, you're right. I was out there with my supporters and speaking to be ready for the next election, speaking about my values.
And just after that, they arrested me, saying that I was not respecting the COVID regulations. But it was not about that. It was about political repression. And in Canada, you cannot speak against the regime. It's like in China.
I was in jail for eight hours. They, you know, handcuffed me, put me in jail, and for a noncrime for just after a gathering with my supporters, and, it was a political repression.
Speaker 0: I mean, from our perspective, if this can happen in Canada, we should be afraid very quickly. Is anyone else in Canada afraid of what's happening? Do people see this as as scary?
Speaker 2: But I was not the only one to be put in jail for my belief. Actually, another candidate from my party was put in jail also in Nova Scotia because he was doing a freedom rally. So it is scary that in Canada right now in 2021, you are like in China. Actually, I will always fight for what I believe. And like I said to the policemen, my weapon is my words, and I will always use my words to fight for more freedom and a smarter government in Canada.
I will be back in Manitoba.
Speaker 0: Maxime Bernier, we're out of time. We are rooting for you. Come to America. Great to see you. Thank you.
Sean Hannity.
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
"I met a little 4 year old girl, she asked me, whether if I could prevent Trump from invading our country. And that's why I'm standing to be the Liberal Party leader, and to become the next Prime Minister of Canada." Chrystia Freeland's opening statement at the French debate. https://t.co/xu4wqDYph9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm running to lead the Liberal Party and become Canada's next Prime Minister because of a serious threat. Recently, a young girl asked me if I could stop Trump from invading us, highlighting the real concerns people have. Trump poses the biggest danger to Canada since World War II.
He's already threatened us with economic warfare before, and now his threats are even worse, aiming to essentially make us the 51st state. His support for Putin's actions in Ukraine shows he's willing to redraw borders, and he might do the same to ours.
We need a leader who understands the gravity of this and knows how to stand up for our country. I'm ready to fight for Canada and everyone who lives here. Together, we can and will win.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few weeks ago in Saskatoon, I met a little four year old girl. She asked me whether I could prevent Trump from invading our country. And that's why I am standing to lead the Liberal Party and to become the next prime minister of Canada. Trump represents the greatest threat to Canada since World War two. He is threatening us with an economic war, and that's nothing new.
The last time that he was president, he threatened us too. And at the end of the day, I succeeded in protecting our economy. But this time, Trump's threats are worse. He wants to turn Canada into the fifty first state, and it's no joke. That is why he is supporting Vladimir Putin's criminal attempt to redraw Ukraine's borders.
Trump wants to redraw our borders too. We need a leader who understand the seriousness of these challenges and how to face them. A leader that can respond and defend everyone in our wonderful country. I will fight for us. I will fight for Canada.
And together, we will win.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just emerged from a four-hour court hearing where Rebel News is suing David Lametti, the former justice minister, after the Federal Court deemed the invocation of the Emergencies Act unconstitutional. Lametti attempted to delete his public records, likely to destroy evidence against him as victims prepare to sue the government. The chief justice presided over our hearing, which exceeded expectations in intensity. We're seeking an order to prevent Lametti from deleting his Twitter account, and I feel both nervous and hopeful about the outcome. Your support for our legal fees would be greatly appreciated.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
WATCH: Trudeau's justice minister tries to dodge accountability from Rebel News lawsuit 'It was Lametti who wrote a private text message talking about sending out military tanks to confront the truckers.' I just got out of a four-hour court hearing. Rebel News is suing David Lametti, the former Trudeau justice minister. He resigned in disgrace shortly after the Federal Court ruled that the invocation of the Emergencies Act, which was done on his watch, was illegal and unconstitutional. As he tried to sneak out the door, we discovered that he was deleting his public records (in particular, his official ministerial Twitter account). It’s obvious he was trying to destroy evidence that could be used against him when hundreds of victims of the Emergencies Act sue the government for compensation. Recently we had the third court hearing in our case. And I was shocked to see that no-one less than the chief justice of the court himself was presiding — Justice Paul Crampton. I was blown away. That means the court is taking our lawsuit very seriously. And, instead of a one-hour hearing as we expected, it turned into a full, four-hour clash. Our lawyers were outgunned, four to two. But we held our own and more. The judge said he needs a few days to go over everything before he issues a ruling. I’m nervous but also a little bit hopeful — we’re seeking a court order banning Lametti from destroying his Twitter account (including his private direct messages to other cabinet ministers about martial law.) Remember, it was Lametti who wrote a private text message talking about sending out military tanks to confront the truckers. I really think he’s trying to delete his private messages on his Twitter account, too. We’ll see what happens. But I know this already: Rebel News is the only force in the country trying to hold Lametti to account. Lametti himself has four lawyers, each of whom is being paid by Canadian taxpayers. Our two lawyers — Chad Williamson and Scott Nicol — are reasonably priced, but we have to cover the bill by ourself. Not a single other group is in court with us. It’s just us trying to stop this shifty Trudeau man from getting away with breaking the law. If you can help us by chipping in to Scott and Chad’s fees, please do — you can read our entire lawsuit at http://www.StopTheCoverUp.com. (We chose that website name because obviously that’s what Lametti is trying to do here.” Thanks for your support. I’ll let you know as soon as we have a ruling — which I think could come as soon as Friday. Do you think it’s important to try to hold Trudeau's minister to account? I do. But in court, it’s expensive. Please help us if you can, at http://www.StopTheCoverUp.com. I think Scott and Chad did great! I just hope the justice thinks so, too.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We just wrapped up a four-hour legal battle suing David Lemenyi, Trudeau's former Justice Minister, for illegally deleting his Twitter account after he was found to have invoked the Emergencies Act unconstitutionally. The government is trying to argue that it's a private account and they have no control over it, but we believe it's a public record.
The Chief Justice presided over the hearing, which was surprising, and it lasted four hours, covering various acts and charter submissions. We argued that Lametti broke the law and the government is trying to let him off easy with just a "pinky swear" not to do it again. Despite contradictory arguments from their counsel, we feel our arguments were consistent.
Even if we don't win the injunction, we've already moved from deleted records to promises of preservation. We're concerned about deleted direct messages that could reveal more about Lametti's conduct as a minister. This legal fight is costly, but we're committed to holding the government accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I am sitting in the office of the lawyer, Chad Williamson. We had another lawyer on the file too. Scott Nickel was his name. And literally minutes ago, we ended the four hour legal battle in the federal court of Canada. As you may know, we are suing David Lemenyi, the former and disgraced justice minister under Justin Trudeau, the one who invoked the Emergencies Act illegally, unconstitutionally.
And shortly after it was, ruled to be unconstitutional and illegal, he quit parliament in a huff, and he decamped for a private law firm. But on his way out the door, he tried to delete his Twitter account. But when he's the government minister and he's got that little gray check mark, that is not his account. That is the government's account, the public account, the government account, and that is actually against various laws, including laws touching on the library and archives of this candidate. Well, we went to court right away.
We hired Chad and Scott, and they worked all weekend, and we had an emergency application to get a judge to put it back up. Lometty bent the knee, and he put it back up and said, oh, you caught me. You caught me with the hand in the cookie jar, but, you know, I put it back up. Can I please slink away now? And we said no.
And today is actually the third hearing in two weeks. And here to talk about it is one of the two lawyers representing Rebel News. Chad, how are you doing?
Speaker 1: I'm doing okay, Ezra. It's been a grueling, two weeks and a pretty crazy, day in court today hearing a cauldron of peculiarities. I think I called it on the record coming from respondents counsel. I think there's four government lawyers there arguing that Lammetti, oh, he's a private citizen, that it's not a government account, and that the attorney general has no control over the people that control the account, and, you know, that reactivating his Twitter account, well, that's that's not an admission that he did anything wrong, of course. And then also saying, well, you know, we don't want to consent to an order from the court that, we not destroy any government records.
We'll just give you a lawyer's, lawyer a little undertaking, a little promise, to do that. And, it was a long day. We appeared before the Chief Justice Crampton himself, who's a noted and esteemed justice, has been in his position for at least a decade. Very smart guy. Long, excruciating submissions today.
Scott made most of them for us, and I thought that they were very, very precise, concise, but they're also lengthy because there are so many different issues. We've got the Access to Information Act, Ezra. We've got, the Library and Archives Canada Act. We've got charter submissions concerning rebels' freedom of the press and freedom of expression as well. And it's so difficult to touch on all that stuff when you only have about an hour to do so.
So Scott did a great job. I kind of jumped in, where I could. Then the respondents got to go. And it was just, it was bizarre. It was, quite bizarre.
Speaker 0: You know, here's the two things that struck me the most. We've had a couple of hearings on this matter already before a different judge, and they were about an hour. They were less than an hour. So surprise number one, it's the chief judge himself, the big boss, the absolute big boss himself, which I thought about. And I thought that makes sense because if you're suing the justice minister, if you're alleging that the former attorney general, lawyer, law professor, and the top lawyer in the country broke the law, you need a very senior judge with a lot of gravity to make that.
You don't want a judge who's just appointed. And if you're gonna weigh for or against him, you need a serious, sober minded judge, a smart judge, also a judge who can weigh. How's this gonna look in terms of the rule of law? Do we let a judge a former justice finisher off the hook because he's politically connected, or are we actually gonna rule against him? If if you take on a justice finisher, you better have a weighty guy to do it.
So I thought, you know, there's a lot of politics in this case, and they put the the big boss on it. I I don't know exactly what to make of it other than they realize this is a big case.
Speaker 1: Case. I wasn't expecting that to be honest
Speaker 0: with you.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. Me neither. We see in in a litany of previous litigation going back four years that have had to do with civil rights, we've seen relatively, maybe not junior, but relatively unknown judges presiding over, fairly wide wide reaching and monumental, cases. So, again, I was shocked. It's starting to make a little bit more sense upon further reflection.
That's why I think these debriefs are so important.
Speaker 0: I think the second thing that struck me, and we've already alluded to it, is the first two hearings were less than an hour. This was was about was supposed to be about an hour. In fact, when when some of the lawyers oh, about half an hour, your honor. It will only be about half an hour. Well, it turned into four hours, and, you know, it it was a little long.
I mean, I I'm you know, I gotta answer my pants, so I can't sit for four hours. But the judge did, and he asked a lot of questions. So you got a combination of the the most senior judge in the entire federal court, literally the chief justice of the federal court, plus four hours. This is gonna be a rigorous decision, and I thought it was going pretty well for us. In the end, though, it it almost it almost felt like he was gonna let Lumetti get away with, like, you say, oh, pinky swear.
I swear I won't do anything again, which is much different than a court order. A court order comes with a certain not just a majesty, but if you mess around the court order, you could be in contempt of court. Whereas an undertaking a pinky swear doesn't really cut cut a lot of ice given that this same justice finished the one who broke the law by trying to delete his account.
Speaker 1: I I I think what's imp what's what's important to remember when we look at this case is this all started because Lammedi, or somebody acting on his behalf, deleted his Twitter account or deactivated it. There's evidence before the court that if it's deactivated for thirty days, they start trashing the data and it's gone. We call it the the pipeline of destruction. You made a great comment online that if this was a drinking game where if every time Scott said the pipeline of destruction, well, we'd all be having a lot of, fun towards the, the end of that because of how how much we're trying to impress upon the court. But David Lammetti basically put his Twitter account in the bin, and the garbage man was on the way to come and pick up the trash.
Speaker 0: And they argued, oh, well, don't you worry. You don't need a court order now because it's against the law to delete it. Well, yeah, that's the whole point. That's the whole reason we're here is because David Lammetti already broke the law. And you're saying, oh, you don't, you know, fine.
You caught us. We just pinky swear we won't do it again. But then later on, one of his lawyers who I'll use his pronouns, Mr. Grossman, he, him, he he argued, well, once we've preserved the records of the library and archives Canada, mister Lamente can delete it all he likes because he's a private person. He's not bound by the government anymore.
So he basically said, I we are gonna delete it. Now he later sort of backed away from them, but I couldn't believe they they said some things that I found astonishing. They said he's not a government actor, so he's not bound by government laws. And and Scott Nicholl, your colleague said, well, does that mean someone can be a private person, come into public life, do a lot of public decisions, and then just snap his fingers and quit and say, I'm a private person. You can't come at me anymore.
I can do what I like. There was there were and there were a lot of points I saw the judge really engrossed with. But I you know what? I don't know how it's gonna go, and you don't wanna read too much in the judge's expression or or even his questions, but it really is on a knife's edge, I feel.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and I do too. I I I always try to get the pulse of the justice as we're going through the case. And, at the start, I really thought that we swung the needle in our favor. I thought it was going quite well.
As is often the case when we're against a bunch of government lawyers, especially when we think that we've got a really strong case, I usually find that their submissions also help tip the scales in our favor because usually they're rambling, they're contradictory. You know, they try to kind of reframe our argument for us in a way that is maybe, sometimes disingenuous. So I really felt that it was swinging our way. But just towards the end, I just started getting the feeling that, hey, wait a second. I think that the justice realizes, obviously, that this is a very, very important decision.
There is a ton of materials that have been put before the court. He's gonna have to go and review them because we've got these this network and matrix of, kind of conflicting, acts of, of parliament that also have some obligations that are kind of intertwined. We've got charter submissions. You know, we've got obviously a whole bunch of evidence that, you know, there probably is gonna be destruction if he goes and does it again, but I heard arguments in there and again and again, it's it's like you're on the battlefield. Right?
You don't know if if that bullet whizzed why at at 01:00 or at 03:00 or maybe if it was friendly fire, but I could have sworn I heard, respondents counsel, for for Lumetti say, well, you know, there's no obligation for him to keep his Twitter account now that he is, he's a private citizen. So in one breath, he's kinda saying, well, you know, he shouldn't have to do keep his Twitter account. He's not, you know, he's not he's a he's a private citizen now. There shouldn't be any court order requiring him to keep his Twitter account. But then by the end of the day, he's saying, well, hey, we'll totally keep his Twitter account up by way of undertaking.
So it was back and forth all day. It was really hard to kind of wake up from all this and go, well, what the heck happened in that four and a half hours? But I saw there's so much contradictory arguments coming from the respondents. People saying, oh, he's not a government guy, and oh, the government has no control over these, these Twitter accounts. Very, very, very, very strange.
Whereas I think that, the arguments from Scott and the arguments from Rebel and from yourself as an applicant, I actually thought that they were very dialed, very consistent, and who knows, maybe that's gonna be enough to, to win the day.
Speaker 0: Well, we'll probably find out within a couple days. He really sounded like he wanted to get it out quickly. I wouldn't be surprised if he releases it even this week, which is not normal. I mean, this is an emergency injunction. We're seeking the preservation of the Twitter accounts unless he delete them again.
I wanna mention one more thing. We got the court to allow a public Zoom link. I mean, in Canada, courts are public, but the idea of having cameras in a court is a fairly novel one. The COVID nineteen scare really forced that into happening. So what was exciting is that we emailed out our Rebel News viewers the link to log in.
And throughout the hearing, like for four solid hours, there was between 405 people at any one time. You know, people were coming and going, but I would imagine cumulatively over the course of the four hours, a few thousand people watched, which is impressive to me because, I mean, there were some technical legal arguments and lawyers are not the most scintillating people around. Judges, I don't know how they keep their attention span. I mean, I I grayed out a few times, I will admit, although I was tweeting the whole time. If people wanna see, we've got that website, stopthecoverup.com, because that's really what it is.
Why on earth would he delete his Twitter account? And our lawyers again and again said, we're not asking for anything. We're not asking for any money. Obviously, we're not asking for Lamedi to actually positively do anything. It's not mandating him to do something.
It's prohibiting from doing one thing. Don't delete it. Like, just hey. Just don't delete it. Okay?
No. No. No. No. No.
We don't want a court order saying don't delete it. We'll give you a pinky swear, and it and it has all sorts of wiggle room. It's so weird how hard they're finding this.
Speaker 1: One thing that I would say, and and this is not necessarily to look at this, you know, whole thing with a rosy hue and that, well, you know, even if we don't get the injunction, well, you know, we won anyway. But I really want to impress upon everybody that this started as a government minister and government MP leaving office and deleting his Twitter account. In the span of two weeks, we've gone from, basically, the destruction of what we consider to be government records to Twitter's backup online, and from my understanding, he's tweeting again. So he's using the account. Moreover, we've gotten them from going, well, you know, he, you know, he shouldn't have to use the government account whatsoever to saying, hey.
Well, what can we promise to do that will satisfy the court that we're not gonna delete the records? And that's from absolutely nothing. If if Rebel did not bring this lawsuit, the thirty days would be gone. The information would be toast. So whether we get the injunction or not, we've moved the needle from deleted records to basically, Lammetti's lawyers going, well, what can we do to, you know, try to make sure that, you know, the court doesn't come down on us too hard for what we did, you know, in the past.
So I I think there is a real victory here. If we get the injunction, that'll be real sweet. But I think we've already made headway. The Twitter account's back up. People can access it.
And now we've got, Lometty's lawyers basically saying, hey. Well, we'll make promises to preserve these records.
Speaker 0: I think what's most interesting is the private so called direct messages. On Twitter, for those who don't know, you can have public tweets for you basically like a town crier. Here you, here you. Here's what I got to say. You want to tell the whole world.
But you can make private direct messages to other Twitter followers that the world doesn't see. So it's like having a contact voice like Facebook. You can send a private message to to your friends on Facebook, that the that the world doesn't see. And that's, I think, why what he's afraid of. Because we saw during the public order inquiry into the invocation of martial law that Lamedi floated the idea of deploying tanks.
Now whether it was a joke, that's a joke or not, I don't know. But we caught him saying it, and it wasn't in a formal means of communication. It was a text message. So what direct messages did he make on Twitter? Because Twitter is even better than a text message because, it's instantly contacting all of your followers.
So a lot of pretty much everyone important in the country would follow David Lometty, Any cop, any a lot of judges, any politician. And like so many people, of course, they wanna, quote, follow the justice minister. So he doesn't even have to know your phone number. He doesn't have to know your email address. If you were a follower, he can send you a message.
I am certain in my bones that he has direct messages that touch on his conduct as a minister. And what I'm afraid of and what I think he's afraid of, which is why he's fighting so hard, is he doesn't want litigants or the world to see any more of these send in a tank moments, especially now that his martial law was declared illegal and people are gonna start suing. And imagine if LaMetti has some private statements like, oh, get them all or I don't care. You know, kill them all. Let god sort them out.
Or what like, that's a key that's a ridiculous example. He wouldn't say that. But some extreme thing that he would say thinking no one would see it because he was just gonna delete his Twitter account, and here we are saying, well, slow down a minute, mister.
Speaker 1: My favorite aspect of litigation and being a lawyer is what's called the discovery process. Now it's a little different in federal courts, a little different in this case, but one thing that I've seen in acting against the government in cases for over four years is every time we start seeing the evidence, I'm a lawyer, I always say, show me the evidence. And I'm pretty much unwilling to make any definitive statements until I see the evidence. Most of the time when we get the evidence, there's stuff in there, correspondence, buddy buddy, internal, you know, messages that are that are pretty gross that might should probably
Speaker 0: Walk or talk.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Totally.
Speaker 0: Totally. I mean, don't think the cabinet ministers are gonna walk or talk. I mean, it's stressful being a cabinet minister. You wanna blow off steam. You're it's tribal.
You wanna beat your chest a bit. You're frustrated. You're dealing with, like, I like, I'm not saying I blame them, but I'm saying if you are the cabinet minister, if you're the justice minister and you're making decisions and you're using public resources and, like a Twitter account, which is owned by the government, it's not your own, it would be like someone may sending emails from work. You send an email from work, it actually belongs to your to your workplace. It's not private.
Speaker 1: We we we saw, an email from Alberta Health Services during the Chris Scott stuff that they didn't wanna provide. We we didn't uncover this until cross examination at trial. And the email said, don't let them know that this is political. When they were trying to obviously shut down these events for what they purported to be public health stuff. And then we got the email saying, hey, we'll just try not to, you know, let the air off that this is, that this is political.
I'm paraphrasing the email. But I wanna see the emails. I wanna see the DMs.
Speaker 0: You know what? I I fear that he's already deleted them. I think anyone who would take over from Jody Wilson and Rabel Jody Wilson and Rabel, I mean, she was a left wing liberal. There's no doubt about it, but she was ethical enough that when Justin Trudeau said, hey. Can you let some of my buddies with SNC Laveline out of this criminal prosecution?
Can you just let them cut a deal? She said, yeah. No. That's not how justice works. And so he fired her.
He fired her over that. And he, therefore, obviously looked for the most unethical, ethically malleable gumby that he could twist that he could find. And he found David Lumente. David Lumente was hired specifically because he would do whatever Trudeau said. And we saw that when he brought in the Emergencies Act, which the federal court said was illegal, unconstitutional.
So he is a law breaker, a serial law breaker. He broke the law in the Emergencies Act. He broke the law by wrongly trying to delete his account, And I'm worried this judge is gonna add him off with his slap on the wrist. So just give us a pinky swear, mister Lumetti. And you're a former justice minister, and we're all friends here.
We're all part of the same circle. So a pinky swear is good enough. I'm worried about that. Listen. I'm not I'm not criticizing the judge.
I think the judge paid excellent attention, asked good questions. I'm just worried the judge is gonna rule out of a he's gonna give the benefit of the doubt to the many.
Speaker 1: I suppose we're gonna see, see what happens. We've seen these cases go, both way. One one of the one of the lessons that I learned as a as a young lawyer is you can go into that courtroom a % wrong and come out right.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. You
Speaker 1: can go into that room a % right and still come out wrong. So I guess only time will tell, and we'll see, how the judge weighs what's been put before today.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, Chad is one of our winningest lawyers. That's for sure. He was the lawyer the Rebel News hired in 2021 when Trudeau's hand picked Election Debates Commission tried to kick us out and we won. And we got an injunction requiring them to accredit us.
And, of course, a few small fun wins when Stephen Gilboa and three other cabinet ministers, Yara Sacks, Karina Gould and Marcy Iain, blocked rebel news journalists who went to court and got them smacked down with a consent order. So we are holding the Liberals to task. Some are bigger than others. Some of those wins are more important than others, but they all have one thing in common. We're alone in the court.
Well, I mean, there were 500 people watching the whole time. But when I say we're alone, I mean, does no one else care about a justice minister illegally deleting records? Does no one else care about a government debates commission keeping out enemies of the prime minister? Does no one else care about cabinet ministers censoring constituents they don't like. I'm sure people do care, but I don't see him in court with us.
And it's a strange thing for a news company whose motto is telling the other side of the story to spend so much time, energy, and frankly, money holding the government to account. Is that our job? Well, fact fact is it's fallen to us. That's why I wanna invite you to go to our website, stopthecoverup.com. I want you to see what we've got written there, and I want you to consider chipping in.
Scott and, Chad were brawling for four hours, and, obviously, they prepared for many more hours in advance. And they don't work for free. I think they're reasonably priced, frankly. But, we have a lot of They're
Speaker 1: very reasonably priced. Reasonably priced.
Speaker 0: It's true. It's true. And I won't say what your fee is. It's it's quite modest. But it does add up when you work two hundred hours, three hundred hours on a file.
I'm not sure what the exact numbers on this. It adds up. And over the next week, you will see us take on very interesting litigation, and it costs money. And and part of me wishes there was, were others in the field of play, that others were fighting for freedom in the press. I don't see a lot of people fighting for freedom in the press now.
And, if it falls to us, well, then so be it because we've got a secret weapon that David Lamenti doesn't have, and that secret weapon is you.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
President Trump says he's "not looking for a concession" as he announces 25% tariffs on Canada, describing the decision as "purely economic" and not a "negotiating tool." https://t.co/5DYjZf7fY2
Video Transcript AI Summary
There’s nothing that China, Canada, or Mexico can do tonight to prevent the tariffs from being implemented tomorrow. This is not a negotiating tool; it’s an economic decision due to significant trade deficits. Canada has a nearly $200 billion deficit with the U.S., and it’s unfair for the U.S. to subsidize Canada. Mexico has a $250 billion deficit, and while border crossings have decreased, the past administration allowed many criminals to enter the U.S. Fentanyl, primarily produced in China, is a major issue, with much of it coming through Mexico and Canada. Overall, these countries have not treated the U.S. fairly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, is there anything China, Canada, and Mexico can do tonight to forestall your implementation of tariffs tomorrow? No. Nothing. Not right now. No.
Not a negotiating tool? No. It's not. No. It's a pure economic.
We have big deficits with, as you know, with all 3 of them. And in one case, they're sending massive amounts of Fentanyl, killing 100 of thousands of people a year with the Fentanyl. And in the other two cases, they're making it possible for this, poison to get in, number 1. And number 2, we have big deficits, and it's something we're doing. And we'll we'll possibly very substantially increase it or not.
We'll see how it is, but it's a lot of money coming to the United States. As you know, we have about a $200,000,000,000 deficit with Canada, getting close to $200,000,000,000. It's they've treated us very unfairly. And I say, why should we be subsidizing Canada? They you know, it's wonderful.
I have so many friends in Canada. It's a great place. Is there a concession you're looking for, sir? No. We're not looking for a concession.
And we'll just see what happens. We'll see what happens. And with Mexico, it's the same thing. We have a $250,000,000,000 deficit, and we have a lot of people coming into the border. And now we've largely stopped that, but we stopped that ourselves.
And I think they've done a fantastic job. You've seen the numbers have dropped to almost 0. But we've suffered under the past administration. For years years, we've suffered with millions of criminals coming into our country. Criminals, people from jails from all over the world.
They come through Mexico, and they come through Canada too. A lot of them come through Canada, and a lot of fentanyl comes through Canada. And China makes the fentanyl. You know? China makes the fentanyl, gives it to Mexico, puts it through Canada, puts it through different different places, mostly Mexico, but also a lot through Canada.
And so all 3 haven't treated us very well.
reSee.it AI Summary
Premier Doug Ford warns that Ontario faces an "unprecedented attack" on families, businesses, and communities if President Trump imposes tariffs due to Canada's border security. He assures that his government will "protect" Ontarians as it did during the pandemic.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Premier Doug @FordNation says Ontario will see "an unprecedented attack" on families, businesses and communities if President Trump imposes tariffs over Canada's weak border security. Ford says his government will "protect" Ontarians "just like we did during the pandemic."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ontario is facing an unprecedented economic attack from powerful forces, particularly from President Trump. This situation poses a significant threat to families, businesses, and communities in Ontario and across Canada. We will stand by the people, ensuring their jobs and livelihoods are protected, just as we did during the pandemic. However, this current threat is more targeted and intentional, aiming to undermine Ontario's businesses and shift them to the United States. We are committed to doing whatever it takes to safeguard the people of Ontario.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what I'll tell the people of Ontario, we're going to see an unprecedented attack to our families, to our businesses, to our communities, something that we've never seen in the history of the country getting economically attacked by the largest country in the world, the most powerful person in the world, when it comes to President Trump, and we're going to be there for him. We're going to support the people. We're going to protect the people, protect their jobs, protect communities, protect businesses just like we did during the pandemic but this is going to be more of an impact. The pandemic was natural around the world. This is a man targeting to attack and take every business out of Ontario, out of Canada and try to bring it to the United States.
And I'll do whatever it takes to protect the people of Ontario.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
@fordnation http://CallTheElection.ca.
Call the Election!
Justin Trudeau is clinging to power — sign the petition to call for an immediate election, and help Rebel News expose Trudeau’s scheme!
rebelnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
During a confrontation in Davos, Ezra Levant questioned former House Speaker Paul Ryan about his refusal to congratulate Donald Trump on his recent election win. Ryan dismissed the inquiry, stating he didn't want to engage with Levant, whom he deemed obnoxious. Despite repeated attempts to get Ryan's thoughts on Trump, he remained unresponsive and deflected questions about his presence at the World Economic Forum. Levant's efforts to clarify Ryan's stance on Trump and his meetings went unanswered.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Paul Ryan REFUSES to congratulate Trump on his COMEBACK election win Rebel News CEO @EzraLevant attempted to scrum former Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan in the streets of Davos, Switzerland, at the World Economic Forum. He refused to congratulate U.S. President Donald Trump on his election victory nearly four months ago. "You refuse to congratulate the president," Ezra said during his heated exchange with Ryan. "No, I refuse to talk to you because you're being obnoxious," replied Ryan. "I'm not being obnoxious, I'm asking a very simple, easy question," Ezra countered. After repeated deflections when asked about the President, who addressed the Forum Thursday afternoon, Ryan articulates he "does not like 'walk-and-talk' interviews." "Could I ask you for your thoughts on Donald? Give me a word on Donald Trump," said Ezra. "I'm good," replied the former house speaker. "Are you optimistic that he'll be a good president?" Ezra asked. "I'm good," he said. Ezra attempted to seek clarification on why Ryan was a WEF attendee, but did not receive an answer. "Who are you meeting with? Where's that secret?" No answer. REPORT by @EzraLevant:
Video Transcript AI Summary
You refused to congratulate the president.
I refuse to talk to you because you're being obnoxious.
I'm just asking a simple question. What are your thoughts on Donald Trump?
I'm good.
Are you optimistic he'll be a good president?
I'm good.
You seem resentful of the president.
You're putting words in my mouth.
Why not commend him for his victory?
I need a QR code to get in.
It seems stingy not to congratulate him.
Go watch my Bloomberg interview.
I think you're jealous of Trump.
I'm just trying to navigate my emails.
What are you doing at the World Economic Forum?
There are reasons a Republican could be here.
My questions weren’t obnoxious; they were straightforward. His refusal to congratulate Trump suggests bitterness.
For more reports from the World Economic Forum, visit wefreports.com. If you want to help fund our coverage, I’d appreciate it. Unlike Paul Ryan, we don’t have lobbyist support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You refused to congratulate the president. That seems No.
Speaker 1: I refuse to talk to you because you're being obnoxious.
Speaker 0: I'm not being obnoxious. I'm asking you a very simple, easy question. Hey. Look who I just bumped into on the streets of Davos. What's Paul Ryan doing here?
You know who I mean. He was the speaker of the house, and then he ran for vice president. I asked him some questions. He didn't like him. Mister Ryan, can I ask you for your thoughts on on Donald?
Give me a word on Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm good.
Speaker 0: Are you I'm good. Are you optimistic that he'll be a good president?
Speaker 1: I'm good. I mean,
Speaker 0: I know you're good. Don't walk
Speaker 1: and talk interviews. It's just not my style.
Speaker 0: Well, just give me a word. It sounds like you're resentful of the president. Sounds like you're trying
Speaker 1: to put words in my mouth.
Speaker 0: Well, then put your own words in your mouth.
Speaker 1: I'm a good at what you did.
Speaker 0: Well, I I'm not because I'm not eliciting a a good answer from you.
Speaker 1: You're not voting yet.
Speaker 0: Well, why wouldn't you at least commend the president for his victory?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I need you to send me the QR code so I can get in. Yeah. Yeah. Just send me the QR code.
Alright? Yeah. Well, I
Speaker 0: Don't it seemed a little stingy. All the world leaders are are at least congratulating him. You refused to congratulate the president. That seems No. I refuse
Speaker 1: to talk to you because you're being obnoxious.
Speaker 0: I'm not being obnoxious. I'm asking you a very simple, easy question. Here's what
Speaker 1: I want you to do. Go on Bloomberg yesterday and look at my TV interview and use theirs.
Speaker 0: I think you're jealous. I think you had your shot and you failed, and you're sort of grudging towards Trump who won. Is that wrong?
Speaker 1: Hang on a second. Yeah. There's right. No. Yeah.
You gotta send me the QR code. Right. Yeah. No. That's what I need just to get in.
Alright. Let me check that email. K.
Speaker 0: Are you still working out? I'm trying to I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about entertain. You're obnoxious.
Speaker 0: You're being obnoxious. Actually, I think you're being obnoxious. You're refusing to say even a grudging congratulations to the new president. No.
Speaker 1: I'm just not gonna talk to you.
Speaker 0: Why?
Speaker 1: Hang on a second. Alright.
Speaker 0: I think you're a sore loser. What are you even doing at a left wing place like the World Economic Forum? It's not very Republican. Who are you meeting with? Where's that secret?
Speaker 1: Right now, I'm trying to navigate my emails. So
Speaker 0: But what are you doing here? Like, this is a George Soros kind of place. Is that your crew now? Is that who you hang with? You know, there are some good reasons why a Republican could be here at Soros Central, the World Economic Forum.
I mean, Donald Trump himself is giving a speech by video, and Javier Millet came here to talk about freedom. You can come here to bury, not to praise, but I think Paul Ryan is here for some very rhino reasons. You know what I mean by that? Republican in name only. That will mean greater profits and greater tax.
My questions to him were not obnoxious. They were plain questions. The fact he wouldn't even say congrats, go president to Donald Trump tells me he's a bit of a bitter man. For Rebel News, I'm Ezra Levant. And to follow all my reports from the streets of the World Economic Forum, go to wefreports.com.
And if you wanna chip in to help us crowdfund our costs, I'd be grateful. Unlike Paul Ryan, we don't have a fat lobbyist bank account backing us. Thanks.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
MORE: https://rebelne.ws/40IIxBP
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
To see all of our coverage at the World Economic Forum 2025, visit: http://WEFReports.com
WEF Reports 2024: Mission to Expose the Davos Elites
The fearless Ezra Levant, Australia Bureau Chief Avi Yemini, and a support team are in Davos, Switzerland all week to expose the Global Elites as they orchestrate their agenda for the coming year at the World Economic Forum's 2024 Annual Meeting.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Bruce Pardy (@PardyBruce), a Queen's University Law Professor, says our governments no longer respect Charter limitations nor the rule of law. They will do anything to acquire more power. FULL REPORT by @EzraLevant: https://rebelne.ws/3PjImWU
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the recent arrests of journalist David Menzies, who has now faced police action five times in 2024 for simply asking questions. His inquiries range from questioning a government official about an Iranian terrorist group to confronting pro-Hamas protesters. It seems there's a troubling pattern where police target conservative voices while being lenient with liberal supporters. The silence from mainstream media and organizations is equally concerning. We're determined to support David's legal fight against this injustice.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
"This is sharia law that you’re seeing on the eve of remembrance day, these officers are disobeying their oath… this is Justin Trudeau’s Canada, didn’t Don Cherry warn us about this 5 years ago?" David Menzies arrested by Toronto Police while reporting on the pro and anti-Israel rallies in Toronto. Support his legal fight: http://StandWithDavid.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is an example of Sharia Law being enforced, with officers disregarding their duties. I feel assaulted and overwhelmed by the situation. My grandfather fought against oppressive regimes, and I wish he could see how things have changed. This is Justin Trudeau's Canada. I ask everyone to step back as I practice journalism. My cameraman and I are facing aggression while trying to document what's happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, this is Sharia Law that you're seeing on the name of remembrance states. The officers are okay disobeying their role. They are assaulting me. They are begging the need to the Islam Nazis. My grandfather went to court before the 5 years fighting the bomb Nazis.
Thank you. I'm kinda glad he's not around now to see these so called police officers. This is Justin Trudeau's Canada. Everybody back to your pool. Back, please.
Back, please. You can tell me back to you, but you guys are acting safe. I'm practicing journalism. My cameraman and I are getting assaulted, and here are the rest of my life. Yeah.
Stand With David
Enough is enough. Rebel News is fighting back against the pattern of intimidation against our reporter, David Menzies. And we’ve retained two of Canada’s top lawyers to do it.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Toronto Police arrest Rebel News journalist David Menzies yet again https://rebelne.ws/3ADzjwv
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
@ezralevant - Ezra Levant 🍁🚛
David Menzies has now been arrested for the fifth time in 2024, each time for asking questions as a reporter. The first time was in January when he asked Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau's deputy, why she had not banned an Iranian terrorist group. The most recent time was today, when he asked pro-Hamas protesters about their support for Islamic terrorism. Do you see a pattern here? Canada's police have been infected with a woke political virus. They crack down on truckers and conservative journalists, but act as concierges for Liberal politicians and Hamas street protesters. It's disgusting. But even worse is the total silence -- and sometimes even support -- from regime journalists. Five arrests of a journalist. Not "mean tweets", as they usually complain about. Arrests, usually with handcuffs. Not a peep from:@caj@cancivlib@PENCanada@CJFE@AmnestyNow@NewsMediaCanada or the rest of them -- they don't dare jeopardize their Trudeau grants. And they hate David anyways, because he doesn't toe their liberal line. We're going to sue the police and we need your help. If you want to help David, please click here: http://www.StandWithDavid.com. Thanks.
Stand With David!
Enough is enough. Rebel News is fighting back against the pattern of intimidation against our reporter, David Menzies. And we’ve retained two of Canada’s top lawyers to do it.
rebelnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m involved in a class-action lawsuit filed by Rath & Company against the federal and Alberta provincial governments, representing Albertans injured by COVID-19 vaccines. The case centers on Carrie Sakamoto, whose personal lawsuit transformed into a class action for those suffering long-term effects. The legal team argues that the government misled the public about vaccine safety. As we prepare for a crucial hearing, the lawsuit aims to hold the government accountable and challenge the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Alberta-based class-action lawsuit seeks justice for those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines Law firm Rath & Company has filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans who have suffered debilitating injuries from the COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit claims that the governments engaged in “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices” related to the warning, promotion, and distribution of these novel pharmaceutical products. At the heart of the claim is Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge whose personal vaccine injury 10.5 million-dollar lawsuit pivoted into a class action, representing potentially thousands of Albertans facing debilitating, long-term effects from the widely promoted but highly controversial COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Sakamoto’s legal team, led by lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chipiuk (@echipiuk), argues that the government intentionally withheld crucial information about the vaccines before mandating them. Rath emphasizes that their case challenges the blanket assumption that the vaccines are safe and effective, and the goal of a trial would be to enter into public record evidence proving otherwise. The lawsuit is scheduled for a case management hearing tomorrow, a crucial step where the key issues in dispute will be identified. However, Rath criticizes this as a “delay tactic” and an “abuse of process.” Chipiuk points to the government's failure to adequately address the severity of vaccine injuries, which have been largely ignored by programs like the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). This lawsuit is more than just a legal battle — it’s an urgent call for accountability and a potential precedent for future public health responses. As legal action unfolds, will this be Canadians' only hope for the government to take responsibility for the widespread harm caused by its vaccine rollout? REPORT by @TamaraUgo:
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rath and Co, an Alberta-based law firm, has launched a class action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans harmed by COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit alleges unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices related to the warning, marketing, promotion, and distribution of the COVID vaccines.
The governments of Alberta and Canada asserted in court that they had no duty of care to citizens regarding the vaccine products. The lawsuit alleges a conspiracy by the governments of Canada and Alberta, specifically Teresa Tam and Dina Hinshaw, to coerce people into taking the vaccines under the guise of "safe and effective," while preventing them from learning the truth about the shots. The lawyers claim that withholding information constituted assault, especially in cases of vaccine injury.
The lawsuit will address governments ignoring contractual information and scientific data, including Pfizer data allegedly showing the vaccines would kill more children than COVID. The lawyers claim this data was ignored despite being brought to their attention before the rollout of childhood vaccines.
The governments are allegedly attempting to delay the certification hearing through an abusive process. A case management hearing is scheduled, but the lawyers believe the government is using delay tactics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now they can all just deny and bury their heads in the sand and pretend they didn't know any better and that they were relying on, you know, experts like Teresa Tam and, you know, and Dina Hinshaw, who were, in fact, ignoring the pharmaceutical company's own data and ignoring, you know, even the written words of the contract where the the which were the vaccines were not safe and effective, you know, to engage in this mass marketing campaign coupled with the coercive power of the state to force people to get vaccinated with shots that were neither safe or effective.
Speaker 1: Alberta based law firm, RAF and Co, has launched a class action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans harmed by COVID 19 vaccines. As described by the firm, the case alleges unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices by the defendants in relation to the warning, marketing, promotion, and distribution of the COVID vaccines. The case centers around the proposed class action representative, Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge, Alberta whose personal vaccine injury, $10,500,000 lawsuit pivoted to expand into this class action suit on behalf of all vaccine injured Albertans. Sakamoto will be joined by 100, if not thousands, of plaintiffs in similar situations, suffering the debilitating effects of the hailed safe and effective novel modified RNA COVID 19 injections. Lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chibiak from Rath and Co join me now to discuss the government's misrepresentations that they are alleging in this case.
Check it out.
Speaker 0: It's shocking to me the last time we were in court, and I think this is why it's important. Both the Alberta government and the government of Canada asserted in open court that they had no duty of care to the citizens of Canada or the citizens of Alberta for these vaccine products that they were stuffing down everybody's throats. So that's why I think that this is so important. I mean, the government, you know, basically strip people of their human rights and their civil rights, told us we couldn't go on airplanes, told the unvaccinated that they couldn't go to restaurants, couldn't go here, couldn't go there, restricted business operations, to, keep unvaccinated people out of, businesses, knowing full well that the vaccines didn't stop transmission and didn't stop anybody from getting sick. So I think that's why it's important to be because the government knew that these vaccines were harmful, knew that they weren't doing anything that you know, achieving any of the objectives that they thought they were gonna achieve.
But at the same time, you know, we're we're forcing people to take these vaccines, while now standing up and saying, oh, yeah. But you can't sue us because we didn't owe anybody a duty of care in doing this. So I think that's shocking, and I think the public needs to be aware of that. Well, we think, potentially, it's gonna have a huge, set a huge precedent because one of the things that we're that we've specifically plead is a conspiracy on the part of, you know, the the government of Canada and the government of Alberta, but specifically Teresa Tam and Dina Hinshaw and this whole, you know, committee of chief medical officers of health to fool people into taking these vaccines under the slogan that they were quote unquote safe and effective. So they weren't they weren't concerned about giving people the appropriate advice with regard to the vaccines, they weren't concerned with regard to having people make informed decisions from the standpoint of informed consent to getting the shots.
They were only concerned with coercing people into getting the shots and then keeping them from learning the truth about the shots so that they could continue, you know, this so called vaccine rollouts. I think all of the people that were involved, all these chief medical officers of health, Justin Trudeau, Jason Kenny, all of those people, they need to be held accountable. And, you know, that's one of the things that this lawsuit seeks to do, because by taking away people's ability to get informed consent, we're alleging that they actually engaged in a conspiracy to commit assault. So our position is where people were kept well, the real information and the real truth about these vaccines was kept for people. Every shot that went into somebody's arm under the slogan safe and effective, from my perspective, was an assault.
And, you know, and in in the cases of Kari Sakamoto and others who've been horribly injured, there was an assault causing bodily harm.
Speaker 1: Rath explains that the case is focusing on the government's deliberate withholding of information and conspiring to prevent the public from receiving full details about the vaccines before they were mandated. Rath emphasizes that the argument challenges the assumption that the vaccines were safe and effective, and the full scope of a trial would aim to, in fact, prove otherwise, despite other courts taking judicial notice of the safe and effective marketing slogan?
Speaker 2: The court took judicial notice because that's what the public health authorities were taking, telling the general public. So that's what judges were hearing as experts in that field, public health officials. What's really interesting and what we're bringing forward in this case is that the manufacturing companies themselves like Pfizer, we have the, a redacted version of the contract. They themselves don't state that either the vaccines are safe or effective. And so if we're gonna take judicial notice, let's take judicial notice of what the the pharmaceutical companies actually said, not what was represented post, that agreement being signed by public health officials that weren't the ones, you know, that were manufacturing, the the drug or vaccine, whatever we want to call it.
But I think that's an important piece, of distinguishing when it was used as judicial notice and then how we are, bringing this claim forward.
Speaker 0: So one of the other aspects of this claim as well is that we'll be, you know, we'll be getting into the whole issue of the governments themselves, not just ignoring the contractual information, but ignoring actual scientific data that was gathered by the companies during the, you know, during the testing phases of these products. Right? So as an example, Pfizer that's called table 14 of, the Pfizer, emergency use authorization. It clearly demonstrated that if you put these shots into the arms of children, that the vaccines themselves were going to kill more children than covid. And, I mean, that was demonstrate that was Pfizer's own data, and the government of Canada and, Dina Hinshaw and Jason Kenny completely ignored this data even though it was brought to their attention by our office, by letter, prior to the rollout of the childhood vaccines.
So they had information knowing that these shots were gonna kill more kids than COVID, but they ruled them out anyway and continually lied to parents about these shots that are being so called safe and effective. So now we have all these parents across Canada with dead children. Nobody wants to take responsibility for it. Even though Tam and Trudeau and Kenny and Hinshaw were all warned in writing prior to the rollout of these, you know, childhood vaccines that they were like Pfizer's own data indicated that they were gonna kill more kids than COVID. You know, at this stage, you're simply seen as allegations.
You know, once a judge says, well, those allegations are true, it puts a whole different, a whole different spin on all of this from the standpoint of being able to hold governments accountable. Right now, they can all just deny and bury their heads in the sand and pretend they didn't know any better, and that they were relying on, you know, experts like Teresa Tam and, you know, and Dina Hinshaw, who were in fact ignoring the pharmaceutical company's own data and ignoring, you know, even the written words of the contract where the which were the vaccines were not safe and effective, you know, to engage in this mass marketing campaign, coupled with the coercive power of the state to force people to get vaccinated with shots that were neither safe or effective.
Speaker 1: The case will be in court tomorrow for a case management hearing, which is the first court appearance following the filing of the originating application, where the judge parties and their lawyers identify the key issues in dispute and discuss potential ways to resolve them. But Raff calls this a delay tactic and abusive process.
Speaker 0: And what the governments are trying to do is to delay, through an abuse what we say is an abusive process, the certification hearing, by claiming that they should be allowed to have a quote, unquote motion to strike our pleadings prior to certification. And, of course, you know, we'll be talking to the court tomorrow about case law that indicates that this is an abusive process that the government is simply trying to delay inappropriately the certification hearing because the whole issue of is there a valid cause of action is the first step of the certification hearing. So a motion all the case law that we've reviewed indicates that a motion to strike is highly inappropriate. It isn't in itself an abusive process. But again, having litigated with governments for 31 years, this doesn't surprise me.
This is, you know, government lawyer playbook 101, which is delay, and then page 2 is delay, page 3 is delay, page 4 is delay, etcetera. And that's what we're dealing with here is, you know, simply from our perspective, you know, an attempt at delaying these proceedings and what the case law to us indicates constitutes a clear abuse of process.
Speaker 1: The stunning inability of the government to acknowledge the severity of the COVID vaccine injury situation, leaving those injured by these vaccines without proper support as detailed by my reporting on the novel injection borne federally implemented vaccine injury support program known as this makes it clear that legal remedy needs to be brought forward to hold officials accountable and to address the significant harm done while setting a strong precedent for future public health responses and plans. For Rebel News, I'm Tamara Ugolini. We've launched a special campaign at no more shots dotca where you can call on federal minister of health, Mark Holland, to revoke market authorization for these injections. You can also sign our petition calling for the same. Check it out at no more shots dot CA, and support our work by signing our petition and sending that form email to the federal minister telling him no more shots.
That's no more shots dot CA.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
FULL REPORT by @TamaraUgo: https://rebelne.ws/4eKXckn
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
The Wasaga Beach whistleblower received a police visit, then her TikTok account was deleted. Why? After pointing out that new immigrants to Canada are defecating on the sand at Wasaga Beach, Natty's TikTok account was permanently suspended. FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/4cily30
Video Transcript AI Summary
Natty, a resident of Wasaga Beach, Ontario, recently used TikTok to highlight concerning behavior at the beach, specifically that some individuals from the East Indian community are defecating there. Following her video, the Ontario Provincial Police visited her for questioning. Natty expressed confusion about the police's interest in her, stating she is just a single mother trying to raise awareness about a public health issue. She emphasized the importance of education and wanted to inform others to be vigilant about the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody called in Yeah. About somebody posting, things on TikTok About East Indians defecating on beach.
Speaker 1: Natty is a resident of Wasaga Beach, Ontario. And recently, Natty took to TikTok to call out some truly odious behavior occurring down at the beach. Namely, certain people, primarily those from the East Indian community are defecating there. This single mother received a visit recently by the Ontario Provincial Police. The OPP are investigating Nati, the whistleblower.
Speaker 2: I have no idea why they would wanna send to me. Like, I'm just a single mother that wanted to get the message across that, hey, guys. We have a biohazard on our hands, and I wanted to let people know who was doing it so they could be on watch for it. In my opinion, all we can do is educate, and that's really what I wanted people to do.
The Wasaga Beach whistleblower received a police visit, then her TikTok account was deleted. Why?
After pointing out that new immigrants to Canada are defecating on the sand at Wasaga Beach, Natty's TikTok account was permanently suspended.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
🚨BREAKING: Toronto Police just arrested David Menzies (@TheMenzoid) for reporting on a Hamas hate rally! When he tried to interview a Hamas protester, police grabbed him. Watch this insanity — and help us fight back. http://StandWithDavid.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rebel News journalist David Menzies was arrested by Toronto Police while trying to interview a pro Hamas protester. Despite showing his ID, he was taken into custody. This is the second incident in two months where David was harassed by police for political reasons. Rebel News plans to take legal action against the police. To support David, visit standwithdavid.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ezra Levant here for Rebel News. As you can see, I'm in downtown Toronto. I'm standing in front of the Toronto Police Service 51 division. They have arrested our journalist, David Menzies, not one hour ago. It is a false arrest.
It is a political arrest. They arrested him because he was trying to do journalism, asking a question of a pro Hamas protester, and they arrested him. I need your help. I've put in a call to our lawyer. We're trying to locate David.
Go to stand with david.com now, and let me tell you what I'm gonna do. Do you see what that showed? There was a pro Hamas protester. You probably recognize him. He's the guy who shouts hateful things at synagogues, at Jewish schools.
He's the one who has been leading the Hamas rallies around Toronto. David was trying to interview him, and he said, I'm gonna pray in the middle of the street right now. Okay. Well, you go ahead. It's a public street.
David can stand there. But, no, the police came and pulled David off the street as if it became suddenly a Sharia Street, a mosque or something, and then they later arrested him. They claimed he didn't show his ID to police, which is a requirement in Canada. But take a look at this. Those wicked liars are lying.
Here is footage of David Menzies going through his wallet, pulling out ID to show the police, and they arrest him and put him in the back of a paddy wagon. Anyways, take a look.
Speaker 1: Hey. Hey. I'm far enough, buddy. Hey. Listen.
I'm not I'm not shoving you, sir. I'm standing here. You're beating you. I've been standing already. I'm the voice mail.
I'm not violent. Are you gonna listen to me? It's a police investigation. You can arrest me too? Don't get smart.
I ask you to step away. Okay? What's your badge number? 731, sir. Thanks, bud.
Thanks, man. What's your bud? Sir? Sir, I can record my coworker. Right?
Whatever you like. Okay. Go and beat the audience. I never repeated anything. Watch.
It's what I tell you. Are you listening or not? That's bad. That's a good slice. So do your job.
I'll do mine. Alright? Understand. Okay. You're gonna be under arrest for a suspect, please.
Here we go. Hey. Hey, Paul.
Speaker 0: That's my wallet.
Speaker 1: You're under arrest I've asked you for identification numerous times. You failed to identify yourself. That's the fucking police. Catherine, can you grab my We'll get it, sir. Don't worry.
Nobody will touch it. We'll get your identification for you. Okay. I I think you guys are gonna be hearing from our lawyers. That's true.
Thank you. I'll get them, sir. Don't worry. Nobody will touch your property. You're walking back behind the gate.
Thanks, brother. Wait for it. You want them where, sir? Take them back behind the gate. Thanks, guys.
Put him out of here.
Speaker 0: Well, I have just come down. I was called by Efron, our videographer. He showed me the footage. I came down immediately to try and get David released. I went and presented myself to 51 division.
They say they are unable to tell me where David is. He may be here, or he may be at another location. We're trying to find out where he is. We're trying to get him out tonight and home tonight. It's obviously outrageous that he was arrested at all.
He committed no offense at all. This is the Toronto Police having a political bias. They are having 2 tiered policing. Every weekend, the police abide hours and hours of hate marches blasting at Jewish synagogues and Jewish schools. But some Iranian thug who is a pro Hamas activist says this is now a mosque, and the police come in as if this is Iran with some Sharia enforcement, that is a violation of David's personal rights, a violation of his charter rights, and I swear to god that we will take steps against the Toronto Police to take them to court, to have a court, to have a judge correct them, and tell them that this is still a free country, and you cannot tell a journalist he is not allowed to be on a public street recording a public conflict in the public interest.
You cannot enforce Sharia law on the streets of Toronto. And if these cops need to be told that by a judge, so be it. This is the second time that David Manziz has been harassed by police for political reasons in 2 months. Do you remember when Chrystia Phelan's bodyguards thought they would arrest him for asking questions too? Remember this?
Speaker 1: Miss Freeland, how come the IRDC is not a terrorist group? Why is your government supporting Islam now?
Speaker 0: We're suing those cops for a $1,000,000. That's what you do when your charter rights are violated because you need to get the police department's attention. You need to make it sting so they don't do it again. Obviously, the Toronto Police Service hasn't got the message yet. We are going to sue them.
But first, we have to find David. I'm gonna be down here. I'm gonna try and contact his wife, who I understand may have been in touch with him. We will try and get David home tonight. And as God is my witness, we will take this to the police, and we will take them to court.
If you wanna help me, go to stand with david.com. I'm sick of this.
Stand With David
Enough is enough. Rebel News is fighting back against the pattern of intimidation against our reporter, David Menzies. And we’ve retained two of Canada’s top lawyers to do it.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Trudeau reacts to Putin's mention of Canadian Parliament applauding a former Ukrainian Nazi in his interview with Tucker Carlson. http://TrudeauMustResign.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 expresses Canada's unwavering support for Ukraine, condemning Vladimir Putin's invasion and violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. They emphasize that Canada stands with Ukraine not only as friends but also to protect the rules-based order and the rights of all democracies. Despite Russian propaganda's attempts to manipulate public opinion, Canada remains committed to standing by Ukraine for as long as necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've been such an ardent supporter of Ukraine, but there's been a lot of controversy surrounding President Zelensky's visit here. And now we've heard Vladimir Putin use some of that embarrassment in an interview with Tucker Carlson. How does it feel to know that that visit and your office's role in inviting a Nazi a former Nazi, to a reception is creating hardship for an ally.
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin chose to invade a neighboring Sovereign country violating the rights, the sovereignty, the territorial integrity of Ukraine, and violating the rules based order that underpins The safety, the security of all of us living in democracy in free democracies around the world. He will, of course, use whatever propaganda he can engage in. But I can tell you, Canadians will not be fooled. Canada stands with Ukraine, not just because we are friends to Ukraine, But because the rules based order and the system of laws and the UN Charter protect all of us, not just Ukrainians. So we will continue to be there with Ukraine for as much as it takes for as long as it takes.
Unfortunately, we see the lengths to which Russian propaganda will go to try and impact public opinion, to try and twist things the way we want to.
Trudeau Must Resign!
A Federal Court judge has ruled that Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional and unreasonable – repudiating what was arguably the most important decision Trudeau has made during his entire administration!
rebelnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Five men pretending to be women dominated a college female volleyball game, raising concerns about the safety and fairness of women's sports. Two head injuries caused by transgender men were reported, highlighting the physical advantage men have over women in sports. The Ontario Colleges Athletic Association (OCAA) lacks clear policies on transgender women's eligibility. Rebel News faced harassment and obstruction while covering the game. The mainstream media largely ignores the issue, raising questions about the stance of modern-day feminists on this matter.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
TRANS TAKEOVER: Five 'trans women' dominate female volleyball game We went to a college female varsity volleyball game… and a 'sausage-fest' broke out! FIVE men, pretending to be women, were on the court. Why? Just when you thought transanity couldn’t get any worse… Last Wednesday, Rebel News was tipped off that the Centennial Colts were hosting the Seneca Sting in a female volleyball contest in Toronto. But not all the players were actually biological females… Indeed, we were stunned to find out that no fewer than FIVE men were pretending to be women (three on Seneca; two on Centennial.) At times it was hard to watch. The men were definitely the dominant players on the court – especially when it came to spiking the ball. Indeed, our volleyball insider told us that the situation is so dire that it is no longer safe for biological women to compete. Our source, who wishes to remain anonymous given the scourge that is cancel culture, stated the following: “Recently, there have been two major head injuries to female volleyball athletes in the Ontario Colleges Athletic Association (OCAA) caused by transgender men [‘transwomen.’] The first injury, on November 12, 2023, was a concussion caused by C.L. Viloria who plays the middle position for Centennial College. During a game at Centennial College vs. La Cite Collegiate, Viloria attacked the ball with heavy force and hit a La Cite volleyball player in the head. The second injury, on January 22, 2024, was a concussion caused by a transgender woman, Franz Largadas. During a game at Seneca College vs. La Cite Collegiate, Largadas attacked the ball with heavy force and hit a La Cite player in the head. In the 2022-23 season Franz was listed on the Seneca College men’s volleyball team roster and is now on the women’s volleyball team roster this year. In both instances the players had to be substituted off the court. Although injuries do occur in the sport, the sheer force of a man’s volleyball attack is much more powerful than one of a biological women’s force. Currently, there are six transgender men in the OCAA. Five of which are not on any gender-affirming hormone therapy or have not had surgical gonad removal. There is no current policy in the OCAA that is listed publicly on their website about eligibility of transgender women.” Indeed, apparently the OCAA is fine if a man identifies as a woman or a woman identifies as a man – and presumably, we all identify as lobsters… It’s “human rights” accommodation, you see. Despicable wokeness… Almost as rotten was the fact that staffers at Centennial College were clearly trying to cover up this grotesque charade of men playing against women. Rebel News employees were continually harassed, our cameras were blocked, and at one point, security guards told us we had to leave because we were causing “a disturbance” in the stands. It was trumped up rubbish, of course. Perhaps these security guards are aiming for a gig with the RCMP? We held our ground and continued to observe the travesty occurring on the court. It wasn’t pretty… nor fair. The best-of-five series eventually concluded with Seneca winning three games to one; no surprise there given that the Sting had three male players and Centennial only had two. Meaning Centennial was literally “outmanned.” We tried to scrum Largadas and Viloria post-game, as well as the other fake female players: Ara Telan, Jess Garcia, and Jaque Ronquillo. All of them were tight-lipped, as were their biological female teammates (don’t want to be accused of “transphobia” after all…) And for the crime of asking insensitive questions, we were threatened by security guards that we’d be “trespassed” if we did not leave the venue immediately. Again, much like rugby and swimming, men pretending to be women are destroying female sports although you would never know that if you got your news exclusively from the mainstream media. These taxpayer-funded stenographers wouldn’t dream of offending their trans-happy sugar daddy Justin Trudeau, so MSM outlets never cover this nonsense. But as these gender-bending grifters continue to gut female sports, we pose the question yet again: where oh where are the feminists? Or are modern day feminists okay with misogyny in the name of diversity, equity and inclusion?
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a volleyball game at Centennial College in Toronto, it was discovered that five biological males were playing on the female team. This raised concerns about fairness and the impact on scholarships for female players. The coach seemed unconcerned, and security tried to remove the reporters covering the story. The presence of transgender individuals in the stands also caused tension. The incident highlighted the ongoing debate about transgender inclusion in sports and the potential impact on women's safe spaces. To support independent journalism on this issue, visit transmadness.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why Shut up.
Speaker 1: What Oh, wow.
Speaker 0: Answer my question.
Speaker 2: Did we trigger you? Sir, sir,
Speaker 1: why are you playing with the woman? Why are you taking away a real woman's spot?
Speaker 2: I just I just have to out over here. Who are you, ma'am? You're not allowed over here. Why
Speaker 1: hey. Don't Touch me. Why are you allowing men to play with biological females? Sir, why are you taking away a spot from a real woman? Hey, excuse me.
Don't touch me, sir. Allow me. Don't touch Touch me. Don't touch me. What's wrong with you?
Why are men playing with women? We saw it with our own eyes, and now they're changing and they say, hey, coach. Coach, why why are you playing male players? Why are you playing male players? I'm not.
Biological males. Why are you doing that? What happened to chivalry? It's not that Well, Mike canceled it, Why
Speaker 0: What do you wanna ask
Speaker 1: for? Being transphobic?
Speaker 0: Why Please shut up. What? Oh, wow. Answer my question.
Speaker 2: Did we trigger you?
Speaker 0: I hope you can go rotten cow. You fucking
Speaker 1: Oh, did we trigger you?
Speaker 0: Hey. To see if you're a woman
Speaker 1: Sir, are you are you suffering from mental illness? I'm sorry. I'm You
Speaker 0: have a vagina. I don't give
Speaker 3: a give a vagina.
Speaker 1: David Menzies for Rebel News here at Centennial College in Toronto and we have the latest example of Transanity to the power of 5 quite literally. We were tipped off that this female volleyball game that we witnessed earlier featured not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, but 5 men pretending to be females. 3 were on Seneca. 2 were on Centennial. Gee, can you imagine Which side won?
Not only that, the male players were always on the court. So you had biological female substitutes just sitting on the bench for the entire game? Here's another egregious thing about allowing Biological men to compete on the female varsity team. Some of these women are getting scholarships in which to play volleyball, I e, They are using this sport to pay for their tuition. When a guy gets on the team in place Of a female, that benefit is negated.
Also, folks, we couldn't help but notice the perverse Irony, when we read the mission statement of Centennial, for example, in part, it reads values, Integrity, passion, growth, family, equity, diversity. I'm sorry, but if you think that allowing men to get a spot on the female team As an example of integrity, equity, and diversity, you're dead wrong. All it really is Is garden variety misogyny? Folks, let me tell you, we only found out about this perversity on the volleyball court thanks to our tips line. Somebody reached out to us just as someone reached out to us about Nicholas Zapata, the 50 year old man who identifies as a girl.
So, you know, he can Swim as well as change and shower with real 13 year old girls. It's awful. What I'm trying to tell you is keep those tips Cumming, don't be shy. Let us know what's going on out there so we can bring common sense back into a biosphere that has been infected with transanity? Please go to transmadness.com.
That's transmadness.com. Sign the petition, and if you can help us do this independent journalism, because you'll never see the mainstream media here Covering something like this, kindly make a donation. In terms of my camerawoman, Avery and I recording, we were just sitting down, minding our own business, and here, check out these jabronis that formed a human wall to block our recording. She's now on the phone.
Speaker 4: I'm ready, Matt. Nobody's asking you to leave. Okay. If anybody asks, let me know.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Nothing's against you guys.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. This is
Speaker 4: just my recording. I have to buy this property. Okay? This is the. So this is completely garbage property.
Speaker 1: Folks, we were tipped off about this by insiders in female volleyball, which think this is Outrageous. So much so that, real biological woman have needed medical assistance thanks It's taking spikes off their head. That's a spike ball, I mean. And sure enough, when we watched the game, There were 4 games played. Seneca won 3 games to 1 out of 5.
And, clearly, the males were the dominant players when it came Just serving and spiking. And by the way, while we were watching and we weren't doing anything, a security guard came to us, Wanted to wanted us to leave, said we're causing a disturbance, and a fan in the crowd Went to bad for us. Here, check it out. Well, we're not causing any problems.
Speaker 0: I understand you're not. Okay.
Speaker 1: But we
Speaker 0: have a policy in terms of coming to games and watching if there's any media coverage, if there's any stories or A lot of clients, we ask people to send us an email.
Speaker 1: A couple of good questions.
Speaker 0: I understand, but We're allowed to choose your home.
Speaker 4: Yeah. You're being disruptive. We're being disruptive.
Speaker 1: You're called to police. This is Vic. Vic. Thank you, sir. Sir, thank you.
And, well, we tried to scrum them. And you know what? I was having deja vu. It was kind of like When Efren and I went out to Fergus back in July, we had all this interference, much of it from woman. Yeah.
Biological woman who are aiding and abetting men invading female sports?
Speaker 2: Excuse me. Sir, sir, Why
Speaker 1: are you playing with the woman? Why are you taking away a real woman's spot? Are you a misogynist? I'm
Speaker 2: not allowed over here.
Speaker 4: Yeah. I'm just I'm
Speaker 2: just having questions. Over here. Who are you, ma'am? You're not alone over here.
Speaker 1: Why hey. Don't touch me. Don't touch me.
Speaker 0: You touched you ran
Speaker 2: into me.
Speaker 1: You ran into me, we got it on camera, ma'am. Security. All secure. Okay. Why are you allowing men to play with biological females?
Sir, why are you taking away a spot from a real woman? Look at this, folks. Look.
Speaker 0: Hey.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. Don't touch Touch me, sir. Allow me. Don't touch me. Don't touch me.
What's wrong with you? Why are men playing with Hey. Can you please leave? Why are men playing with women? Are you a misogynist?
Can you please leave? Why why are you aiding and abetting the attack on women's sports? Do you think it's right that a biological man should play against women? So, folks, look at this. Just like in Fergus, there are people aiding and abetting these gender bending grifters.
I mean and some of them are woman, if you can imagine this. And again, they bump into us and say that we're assaulting them. And I just find this an absolutely egregious state of affairs. The game was spectacular for all the wrong reasons. Namely, the male players Excelled as you would expect in serving and spiking.
We saw it with their own eyes and now they're changing and they say, hey, coach. Coach? Coach, why why are you playing male players? Coach, why are you playing male players? I'm not.
Well, They are. They're male. They're biological males. Why are you doing that? What happened to chivalry?
It's not that. It might be a little odd. Well, that was the coach, and He's got no problem with this, and I kind of understand it. I guess as a coach, you wanna win regardless of the tactics used? I guess cheating is the way you do it.
Seneca beats Centennial. Seneca has 3 men on their team. Centennial has only 2. Clearly, we know why Seneca won. Centennial was just outmanned, literally outmanned.
Oh, by the way, it's Ryan Miller. Right? What do you feel about using males on females? Oh, suddenly you're not that talkative. Look at that.
Speaker 4: I'm not asking you Sure. Stop recording.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 4: You guys are very valid point that everybody over there on the stage, they're recording. Their place is not too funny. Not everybody can come down and start recording. Right?
Speaker 1: Well, we we're trying to scrum the the male players? But we'll leave. You're a nice guy. We don't wanna cause you trouble.
Speaker 4: K.
Speaker 1: This is an outrage. We saw it with our own eyes. We tried this from the coach. He's perfectly fine with it. Now we're getting the stink eye from security.
Speaker 4: This is, hey. I don't want to give this to you.
Speaker 1: Oh, is That a trespass notice?
Speaker 4: Yeah. I don't want to get this Oh. You guys have already told me that you guys are leaving.
Speaker 1: Okay. We'll go right now. Yeah. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Have a good night, I see. I
Speaker 0: have a question.
Speaker 4: So do you
Speaker 0: think what you said was, you know, respectful?
Speaker 1: Oh, what do you think about biological males, playing against real women,
Speaker 0: sir? I'd like to engage in this conversation because I think you're very
Speaker 1: You know, we're very
Speaker 0: this topic though, and why are you filming me? You don't have my permission.
Speaker 1: We don't need your permission. We're in a public space.
Speaker 0: Talking to me then?
Speaker 1: Well, you came to us, actually.
Speaker 0: Came to me.
Speaker 1: No. You came to us.
Speaker 0: Disrespectful then.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Why are you being disrespectful? I'm being canceled. Why? Wait.
No. No. I'm Am I being transphobic?
Speaker 0: Why Shut up. What? Oh, wow. Answer my question.
Speaker 2: Did we trigger you? No.
Speaker 0: You didn't trigger me.
Speaker 1: Are you trans too?
Speaker 0: Do I look trans As to you?
Speaker 1: Who knows these days?
Speaker 0: Okay. So why are
Speaker 1: What about you characters? How about you guys?
Speaker 0: No comment. Okay. Hope you can go raw and file your
Speaker 1: Wow. What happened to love Trump's hate?
Speaker 0: What? I don't
Speaker 1: You own this place? Oh, did we trigger you? Okay.
Speaker 0: Okay. I'm a woman. Don't help me. You have a vagina. I don't give
Speaker 3: a I have a vagina.
Speaker 1: Did we trigger you, sir or ma'am? Okay. First of all, I'm just talking to you.
Speaker 0: So shut that up. And you I don't care.
Speaker 2: Wow. Okay. Well
Speaker 1: what you're saying. Sir, are you are you suffering from mental illness? Sir, why would you want to, strike a biological female? We're not at all. You guys watching this?
Can you believe this? You have men pretending to be females playing volleyball with real females. Does does anyone wanna weigh in on this?
Speaker 2: What did they have?
Speaker 1: No. Everyone's taking the silent treatment. Wow. Look at this threesome. More more proof that there's ample Mental illness in this community, I should think.
Speaker 0: That's all bad.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think so.
Speaker 0: Yes. You know what? I don't give a You're killing her.
Speaker 1: Why do you have to be, why do you have to use profanity, sir? Why you have to use profanity, ma'am?
Speaker 4: I don't
Speaker 0: give a I'm allowed
Speaker 2: to say.
Speaker 0: Okay? Okay. Out of this building.
Speaker 1: Wait. Oh, are you the owner, sir? Or ma'am? Well, folks, a little PS, as you just saw, not only were transgendered individuals, I don't know if they're men, women, lobsters, you name it. Not only were they on the court, they were up in the stands as fans, and, I think we triggered them.
Folks, I guess at the end of the day, the question is this, Who do we have more contempt for? The cheaters, I e, the men pretending to be women who are gaming the system or those in charge of the sport who are aiding and abetting this grotesque charade? And my source tells me that The presence of these men, all of whom have their male wedding tackle still intact by the way, that means the female players, the real woman, Are too concerned to change in the room, too concerned to shower, so they do that when they get home. If you think this is Diversity, equity, and inclusion? It is not.
This is garden variety misogyny, And it is not only being tolerated, it is being celebrated. We're gonna keep on this file until we can turn the pendulum till we can get back to normal? And save women's safe spaces, be it sports, shelters, or prisons. For Rebel News, I'm David the menzoid Menzies. Well, can you believe that, folks?
We came to a female volleyball game, And it turned into oh, sorry. Who are you? Sorry. No. Why are you touching me like that?
Speaker 2: Because you're pretty,
Speaker 1: No. You came to me. So folks, it's kinda funny. My camerawoman, Avery, and I came to a female volleyball game. Guess what?
It turned into a version of Sausage Fest. Five male players were on the volleyball court. Can you imagine? Taking away spaces from real women. If you think this is offside, please go to transmadness.com.
That's transmadness.com. Sign the petition, And if you can help us do this independent journalism because you'll never see the mainstream media here covering something like this, kindly make a donation.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Jojo Mehta, founder of Stop Ecocide Now and an ally of Greta Thunberg, tells a WEF panel about her desire to criminalize the side effects of making money from farming, fishing, and creating energy. http://WEFreports.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ecocide is the mass damage and destruction of nature, which our organization aims to legally recognize as a serious crime. Currently, society tends to undervalue harm to nature compared to harm to people and property. Unlike genocide, ecocide does not require a specific intent, but rather stems from activities driven by profit, such as farming, fishing, and energy production. However, what is lacking is awareness and conscience regarding the unintended consequences and collateral damage caused by these activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, ecocide as a word is becoming more it's becoming better known around the world, and the concept is generally mass damage and destruction of nature. But legally speaking, what our organization and other collaborators aim to do is to have this recognized legally as a serious crime. Because one of the issues that sort of pervades all of this discussion is that we have a kind of cultural, very grained habit of not taking damage to nature as seriously as we take damage to people and property. And that's I mean, If you're campaigning for human rights, at least you know mass murder, torture, all of these things are serious crimes. But there's no equivalent in the environmental space.
And so and and, you know, unlike an international crime like genocide that involves a specific intent, With Ecocide, what we see is actually what people are trying to do, what businesses are trying to do, is make money, is, you know, is farm, is Fish is do all of these things that are, you know, producing energy and so on, as well. But what's what's missing is the awareness and the conscience around the side effects, around the collateral damage that happens with that.
WEF Reports 2024: Mission to Expose the Davos Elites
The fearless Ezra Levant, Australia Bureau Chief Avi Yemini, and a support team are in Davos, Switzerland all week to expose the Global Elites as they orchestrate their agenda for the coming year at the World Economic Forum's 2024 Annual Meeting.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
BREAKING: Rebel News reporter David Menzies (@TheMenzoid) was brutally arrested by police after he tried to ask Chrystia Freeland questions. Visit Rebel News for more on this story: https://rebelne.ws/3RTGZiQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video transcript involves a confrontation between a journalist and a police officer during a press event. The journalist questions why the government supports the IRDC and is subsequently arrested. The journalist claims innocence and requests the incident to be recorded. The journalist expresses frustration with the government's actions and accuses them of prioritizing political correctness over addressing important issues. The journalist's cameraman is also mentioned as being harmless. The police officer provides a brief statement about everyone's safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Miss Freeland, how come the IRDC is not a terrorist group? Why is your government supporting Islam on that? What? You're under arrest.
Speaker 1: I don't fuck.
Speaker 0: Police, you're under arrest. How am I under arrest? You bumped into me. You pushed into me. You I was just scrubbing with you.
I've got my credentials here, and you just bump into me. So please You're under arrest name in your bag?
Speaker 1: What's your name in your bag there, Clinton? We've been told you're under arrest.
Speaker 0: Why am I under arrest? Come on over here.
Speaker 1: We got a couple of
Speaker 0: You know that. He he blocked my race. What? I've been just screaming, with Christian Freeman.
Speaker 1: I'm a police officer. You're under arrest. What is your name and your I don't know. That's all. How is that possible?
Okay. Because you saw the news for years ago when Black Bay contract
Speaker 0: You mean I was asking questions of recipes?
Speaker 1: No. No. You're asking
Speaker 0: Lincoln, you caught this on video. Right? He's saying I'm pushing people over? Yeah. That's that's an absolute falsehood.
Speaker 1: There were there were So
Speaker 0: now it appeared that way. That's what you're saying, officer?
Speaker 1: It appeared that was pushing people. I wasn't
Speaker 0: I didn't touch a single person. I was
Speaker 1: a little bit aggressive for what was happening. Get that you got it. You're under arrest. Please take the microphone out of my face.
Speaker 0: Well, I'd like a I'd like an ongoing record of this. Can I have the microphone? Can I have the microphone? Can I have
Speaker 1: the microphone? I don't know. Can you give me I'm not resisting. Oh, just take your hand out. Why why
Speaker 0: why am I in the arena?
Speaker 1: I'm just doing Resist. You don't need to resist. Sir, I don't have You don't have to say anything. You want you know the you know you know I I am not saying hi, officer.
Speaker 0: Welcome to Black This is what they do to journalists. I was merely scrumming minister Freeland and a RCMP officer blocked And, evidently, this is now a trumped up charge of assault folks. I didn't come here to cause any trouble. I came here to do my job, And now I'm handcuffed. This this is you're Canada now, folks.
You know? This is The gestapo taking blackface's orders. Outrageous. And meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is Not a terrorist organization is not a terrorist organization. And these liberals have the audacity to show up at a for, for a plane in which almost 200 people were killed.
57 Canadians, 1 unborn child, by the way. And look at this. They don't want it is against the law and black faces Canada to ask insensitive questions, impolite questions. So a The government that props up an Islamo fascist regime, that's okay. But if you ask questions about that, that's not okay.
This is an absolute outrage. Okay. I didn't come here to cause trouble, folks. I just came here to ask questions
Speaker 1: and have now? Okay. They're conducting So that's
Speaker 0: my cameraman, sir. He's not doing anything.
Speaker 1: I just wanna provide a brief statement that everybody's safe, sir. Okay?
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
We encountered two staffers at the pool. They were very angry indeed – not about Cepeda indecently exposing himself, but rather, they were upset that Rebel News was exposing this story. FULL STORY by @TheMenzoid: https://rebelne.ws/3GEvV3R https://t.co/rm9TicyHCv
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man is pretending to be a 13-year-old girl and showering with biological women. The speaker challenges anyone who has a problem with this to leave. The speaker threatens to call the police, claiming that a 50-year-old pervert is swimming with girls. The speaker questions if anyone has an issue with mature males swimming with girls, but receives no response. The speaker mentions seeing the person in question in the mornings and implies that they are biologically male.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got news for you. There is a 50 year old man pretending to be a 13 year old girl, showering and changing with the real biological woman. Do you have a problem with that? Leave the building. Let's go.
Let's go. I don't think so. No. Alright. I'll go call the cops then.
Okay. Call the cops. You know what? I'm gonna call the cops too. That there's a, a 50 year old pervert swimming with girls.
That's the problem, sir. You have nothing to say about that. A real crime. Did you did you did you maybe have any trouble with, mature males swimming with the girls? Yeah.
No. No? Really? Okay. She goes in the chimney.
I see her in the mornings. But she is a he. Isn't he? So he had this male you know what. Right?
Yeah.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz says federal Minister Steven Guilbeault demanded she sign an NDA to know details about the Trudeau Liberals' oil and gas emissions cap. Schulz says it was "wildly disrespectful" and "unbecoming of a minister." http://StopTheCarbonTax.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The owner of the resource asserts their responsibility to manage emissions and rejects the idea that the federal government can do it better. When asked about public support for an emissions cap, the speaker questions the numbers and provides examples of emissions reduction in electricity and methane. They mention industry efforts to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 through technology rather than production cuts. The speaker argues against shutting down production, stating the negative consequences it would have on revenue and healthcare. They emphasize that Albertans and the federal government should not support such a production cut.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the owner of this resource, we have a responsibility to make sure that we're taking care of emissions. That's why we set our target in the 1st place. What we don't accept is the federal government thinking they can do it better than us when they can't. And that's why we're going to be asserting our constitutional right to be able to manage this resource.
Speaker 1: But follow-up question. We had a couple of polls earlier this fall that suggest as many as 2 thirds of Albertans actually support an emissions cap on oil When gas, how confident are you that, Albert was backing on this?
Speaker 0: What are your numbers?
Speaker 1: I think it was, 62% in one poll and 57% in the other.
Speaker 0: No, what are your numbers that you're talking about of Emissions going up. I just need to know what your what your baseline is.
Speaker 1: Well, It was from the Canadian energy regulator, Premier. I mean, I can send them to Sam if you like, but,
Speaker 0: Well, I do.
Speaker 1: I can tell you. So, Britain's emissions are going up. I don't really want to argue about that. I'd like an answer to my second question, please.
Speaker 0: Well, you did assert. That's why I'm curious what your numbers are, because I gave you the can. Two examples of how our emissions have gone down. That's why I need to know why you say that they've gone up.
Speaker 1: Carbon dioxide emissions have gone up. Can. I'm, I'm, you're forcing me to guess here, but I think it was something like 2 56 megatons. I don't have the number can. Offhand, I can find it from the Canadian energy regulator and send it along to Sam.
Too sweet. But I would like an answer to my second question, please.
Speaker 0: Can't. Okay, well, I think emissions are going down. This is why we're probably not going to get an answer to this. Because yes, emissions have gone down 53% in electricity. They've also gone down 45% on methane.
And we're going, and we're continuing to see that the, pathways group, Dow Chemical, Air Products, And others have made emissions, reduction targets of net zero by 2,050. So there is a whole of industry approach can't, to getting emissions down to net neutrality by 2,050. It's a matter of rolling out the technology to make sure that we have the means to do it With a technology approach as opposed to with a with a shut in approach. So if you asked Albertans, do you want your production shut in So that you lose 1,200,000 barrels a day of production, and you reduce revenues by 6,500,000,000 a year, and you're cutting A third out of our health budget. I suspect you'd probably get a very different answer because that is what the implications of a production cut of this magnitude would be.
And that is not something that Albertans support, and it's certainly not something that the federal government should support either. When this industry gave $9,000,000,000 worth of corporate income tax can't do them last year. That is the consequences of what would happen if we ended up with a production cut, which we won't allow to happen.
Please sign our petition to Stop the Carbon Tax!
Add your name to the growing chorus of Canadians who are fighting back and demanding that Justin Trudeau repeal his punishing carbon tax cash grab that hits the hardest-working Canadians the most, while doing nothing to help our environment.
rebelnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
A 50-year-old man, Nicholas Cepeda, identifying as a teenage girl, competed in a swim competition and used the girls' changeroom. Despite World Aquatics regulations, he was accommodated instead of swimming in the "Other" category. This incident highlights the celebration of transanity in Canada, where diversity and inclusion are prioritized over fairness. Cepeda's actions, including showering and swimming with real teenage girls, were deemed acceptable by the swimming community. The authorities failed to enforce the rules, raising questions about the purpose of having a rulebook.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
50-year-old man 'identifying' as teenage girl competes in swim competition, uses girls' changeroom Nicholas Cepeda 'transitioned' several years after puberty… so why is this dude being accommodated? Why isn’t he swimming in the 'Other' category, as per World Aquatics regulations? There was perversity in the pool at the East Bayfield Community Centre in Barrie, Ont., last weekend. This was the venue for the Trojan Cup swimming competition. And guess who dropped by for a dip in the pool? That would be none other than Nicholas Cepeda, a.k.a., “Melody Wiseheart." We first got wind of Cepeda back in October when he competed at a swim meet in Markham, Ont. We were tipped off by concerned parents that this 50-year-old biological man prefers to compete with teenage girls, some as young as 13! And incredibly, everyone from the Barrie Trojans Swim Club to Swim Ontario to Swim Canada seems to be perfectly fine with this gender-bending grifter breaking the rules. But why? Consider that the sport’s governing body, World Aquatics, introduced regulations earlier this year stating that male swimmers who “transitioned” after puberty cannot swim with females. Cepeda indeed “transitioned” several years after puberty… so why is this dude being accommodated? Why isn’t he swimming in the “Other” category, as per World Aquatics regulations? Alas, welcome to Blackface’s Canada in 2023, where transanity is actually celebrated by the woke elites. And another thing: our fears were confirmed that Cepeda does not change and shower in the male or even the family change rooms. Nope, we witnessed this guy going into the girls’ changeroom/showers. It was equal parts egregious, outrageous and downright gross. But not apparently to the people in Canada’s swimming community. Catering to Cepeda’s fetish is yet another example of diversity, equity, and inclusion – even though it’s really misogyny, if anything. And get this: the Karen's who run the East Bayfield Community Centre were offended by OUR presence at the venue! They demanded that we leave the premises for… having the temerity to practice journalism? (We did not leave, as we were not violating any rules.) That prompted them to call the cops! It was surreal. Oh, and after his swim, we did catch Cepeda leaving the community centre. We wanted to ask him how he has the utter audacity to identify as a teenage girl, and then shower and swim with real teenage girls. His response? Cepeda transitioned from a swimmer to a sprinter and ran to his car in the parking lot. What a coward. Yet, shame on the swimming authorities for letting this creep break World Aquatic rules. Indeed, what is the use of having a rulebook if nobody is going to enforce it?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, David Menzies from Rebel News reports on a swimming competition at the East Bayfield Community Center in Barrie, Ontario. He discusses the presence of Nicholas Zapata, a 50-year-old transgender individual who previously swam with underage girls. Menzies questions why Zapata is allowed to compete against biological females, despite World Aquatics regulations stating otherwise. He also highlights the lack of participation in the "other" category for transgender swimmers. Menzies confronts community center officials about the situation, but they refuse to take action. The video ends with Menzies calling the police on Zapata.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Zapata, are you a sexual pervert?
Speaker 1: If it's nothing new with you, why are you telling us to leave?
Speaker 2: Because you can't be doing you can't take film in here.
Speaker 3: You cannot
Speaker 0: We see look. There's people right there in the front row recording. Look at that woman in the corner.
Speaker 1: I don't see anybody recording.
Speaker 0: What are you talking
Speaker 4: about? Okay. Please
Speaker 0: There is a 50 year old male that has invaded the change room and showers Of 13 year old girls. The 50 year old man changing with 13 year old girls. Do you have a record of sexual perversion? Protect me from these people. Protect us from what?
David Menzies for Rebel News here in Barrie, Ontario. Well, I'm standing In the East Bayfield Community Center, that is the venue for the Trojan Cup. It's a swimming competition, And guess who is dropping by the pool for a dip? Yes. None other than Nicholas j Zapata AKA Melody Weishardt, he is the 50 year old man we discovered swimming with girls as young as 13 At the Markham Pan Am Centre just north of Toronto in October, well, he's back.
It's like Jaws 2, isn't it? And the thing is, Why? Why is this being tolerated? For starters, consider that the world's governing body, That would be World Aquatics. Introduce regulations earlier this year that state Male swimmers who transitioned after puberty cannot swim with females.
Cepeda Transitioned well after puberty, so he's breaking the rules of the world governing body. And Swim Ontario, Swim Canada, this community center, they seem to have absolutely no problem with that. And by the way, this is not to say Nicholas Zapata should be banned from the pool. What World Aquatics did was introduce an other category Specifically for transgender people. And, you know, at the world swimming championships back in October in Berlin, Germany, Not 1 person entered the other category.
So you have to wonder, don't you folks? The trans community has been screaming for years years, tolerance, acceptance, we wanna compete. Well, World Aquatics allowed that To give them their own division, nobody showed up. So maybe there's something else at play. And by that, I mean, is Nicholas Zapata?
I don't know. Does he have a fetish? Does he want to go into the girls' change room? Does he want to shower With 13 year old girls, that's what it looks like to me. My cameraman, cameraman, rather, Avery spotted him going into the female change room and nobody here, none of the officials is stopping him from doing so.
Again, Who cares what Rebel News or David Menzies has to say about transgender athletes? This is the world governing body saying this is offside. In any event, we hope to interview Nicholas Zapata. I think he was tipped off that we were here, and he entered the community center through a back entrance. Perhaps we can catch him going out.
In the meantime, we're gonna watch him swim. Just will you see the perverse visuals Of a 50 year old man lining up against 13 17 year old girls.
Speaker 3: If you're not going to listen, I'm gonna ask you to please stop recording me.
Speaker 0: When you're in a public place, there's no recording me. There's no expectation of privacy.
Speaker 3: Then we need to call the police.
Speaker 2: Mister Benjamin, I'm gonna call mister Oakley on you. So
Speaker 1: How are you doing, sir? Good.
Speaker 0: Do do you know, I'm gonna leave. Who are you?
Speaker 3: No. We're not we're not doing Okay.
Speaker 0: Well, you have no authorization to kick this out.
Speaker 3: Yes. We do.
Speaker 0: Are you a security guard? No. Okay. Ben, have a nice day. Pardon
Speaker 2: me? Facility operators, David.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a public facility. There was a 50 year old man competing against 13 year olds and changing In the girl's shower. Are you gonna do anything about that?
Speaker 2: No. It's got nothing to do with me, David.
Speaker 0: You just Why aren't you gonna do anything about that?
Speaker 4: You have
Speaker 2: to be out you have to go outside.
Speaker 1: You gotta
Speaker 0: go outside. I don't think so. I we're here to cover some perversity happening in this swimming pool.
Speaker 2: It's got nothing to do with me, David.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, if it has nothing to do with you, why you telling us to leave?
Speaker 2: Because you can't be doing can't take film in here. You cannot
Speaker 0: We see look. There's people right there in the You're on the road recording. Look at that woman in the corner.
Speaker 1: I don't see anybody recording.
Speaker 0: What are you talking about, dad? What is your thing? Down here. Okay.
Speaker 2: Keep calling the police right now. Okay.
Speaker 0: You know what? I'm tired of the we're gonna call the police.
Speaker 3: No problem.
Speaker 1: We're because you have a 50
Speaker 0: year old man Changing with 13 year old girls. Do you think that's right? No comment. No comment? You don't think that what about you, sir?
Do you think that's right? Do you have a daughter?
Speaker 3: You this isn't about us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. It's about a 50 year old man who might be a sexual pervert showering with 13 year old girls. Are you unhappy with that? To leave
Speaker 3: Okay? We are going to call police.
Speaker 0: Well, Hoch, you saw yourselves. Some people who would not identify themselves said we're not allowed to film. There are tons of people recording in the spectator value, gallery. Look, Avery. There's the lady in the black top.
She's filming totally unmolested, but the real story is they are protecting what we think might be A sexual pervert. A 50 year old man swimming with girls who are minors and apparently changing And showering with them too. You know what? They said they're calling the police on me. I'm calling the police on them.
Yes. Hi there. I'm at the East Bayfield Community Center, and there is a 50 year old male that has invaded the change room and showers of 13 year old girls.
Speaker 4: Okay. I have a call in here for officers to attend the work center there. Is he he's not in the swimming area now. Is that correct?
Speaker 0: He is on the, swimming deck. That's right. He just had a swim in the pool. Well, there you go, folks. For a change, we called the police.
And why did we call the police? Because we are seeing, as I said earlier, perversity in the pool. He has absolutely no right according to the world governing body for swimming, that would be World Aquatics, To be swimming with biological females, let alone biological female minors, and yet it's being tolerated. And as you saw, the people running this community center, the cowards wouldn't give their name. They were ejecting us based on A no filming rule, but, you know, the thing is we made a printout of the Photography regulations and the video regulations.
And, essentially, it's not to publish unflattering shots, Anything of a sexual nature and, of course, not to go into change rooms, bathrooms, and showers while filming. Isn't that interesting? They don't want a camera going into the shower that a 13 year old girl is in. But if you're a 50 year old male With your wedding tackle still attached, that's equity, diversity, tolerance, and all the rest of that rubbish. This is the crime happening here.
We just watched Nicholas Zapata swim against 7 other competitors. And guess what, folks? This gender bending grifter came in 6th place. That's right. Swimming against teenage girls, he came in 6 out of 8.
What a loser. We finally have a definitive answer to where Nicholas Zapata changes and showers. It is in the girl's dressing room. I saw it myself with my own eyes. He didn't go into the male dressing room.
He didn't go into the family dressing room. Mister Zapata, what what is your deal? Why are you swimming With 13 year olds, why are you breaking world aquatic rules? Why are you running? What are you?
Mister Zapata, are you a sexual pervert? Why won't you answer these questions? Why are you breaking world aquatic rules? You transitioned after puberty, did you not? Mister Zapata, why are you a coward?
Do you have a do you have a record of sexual perversion? Protect me from these people. Protect us from what? Where are you going? But do you think it's appropriate?
A 50 year old man competing and changing and showering with 13 year old girls. No. No. How does that nursery rhyme go, folks? See how they run, and that rat really went into an Olympic style Sprint.
I wonder if he's running races against 13 year old girls too. This is an absolute joke That this individual is being allowed to compete against biological females that are A third of his age. And this is on Swim Canada. This is on Swim Ontario. And this is on the Berry, Trojans Swim Club as well for being accommodated in such a fashion.
And we Are the bad guys in this? We have the community center employees phoning the police. It's been almost an hour now. They still haven't arrived. I don't know if we should stick around.
We phoned the police too, but I guess they know where to reach us. In any event, this is the latest In Transanity, we're not gonna let this story go, folks. We're gonna keep covering it. This is, as I said earlier, Perversity in the pool. For Rebel News, I'm David Dementoides Menzies.
Well, you know, folks, when it comes To Transanity out there, where is the mainstream media? They either think it's too much of a third rail issue or They actually agree in a biological male identifying as a teenage girl. It's sick. Please, we depend on you for support. Please go to rebel field reports.com.
That's rebel field reports.com. And if you're able to, kindly make a donation.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
UPDATE ON THE NIAGARA VEHICLE EXPLOSION: Dump trucks are now blocking entry to the America from the Canadian side. Full story by @realmonsanto: https://rebelne.ws/3QRXiMt
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404
rebelne.ws
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
The Persian community came out to stand in solidarity with Israel at the rally at Toronto’s Mel Lastman Square. Post-Israeli massacre, Toronto made for a tale of two demonstrations on Thanksgiving Day. FULL REPORT by @TheMenzoid: https://rebelne.ws/3RUUUXC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Iranians are showing support for the Jewish community and Israelis, clarifying that it is the Islamic regime in Iran, not the Iranian people, that funds Hamas and Hezbollah. They emphasize that Iranians have historically supported Jews. They call for Western countries, specifically Canada, to recognize the Islamic regime as a terrorist organization and listen to Iranians' requests. They highlight that Iranians in Canada, funded by the regime, are not being held accountable. The conflict in the Middle East is described as a war between Hamas, funded by the Iranian regime, and Israelis, including Iranians within Iran. They stress that the Iranian people are fighting against their own regime and ask for understanding that the regime's actions do not represent all Iranians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is Iran that is funding Hamas. Iran is the
Speaker 1: I just wanna correct you. It's Islamic regime in Iran, not the Iranians. To give you some context throughout through history from 25 100 years ago today from Cyrus the Great, onwards. Throughout history, Iranians have always been supporters of Jews across the world. What we have right now in the last 40 and some years that happened after the Iranian revolution with the Islamic regime coming to Iran.
They're funding the Hamas, the funding Hezbollah of Lebanon. That doesn't mean that Iranians are against Israel or against Jews. We're out here today to just show our support as Iranians to the Jewish community, to the to the to the Israelis across the world, and just tell them that know that Iranians love you. We care about you. It's unfortunate a government who's funding the terrorism that's happening across the world.
We we are fighting against our regime. Our regime is killing our own people within Iran right now. And and we find the same fight that Israelis and Jews are fighting in in in Israel right now with Hamas being Iranian agents in the region. So, really, I guess the first step would be for the Western countries for Canada specifically to recognize IGC as a terrorist, terrorist organization, really supporting Iranians and and listen to what they're asking for. There are Iranians that are funded by the regime in Iran, living in Canada right now, comfortable moving around.
They have embezzled money from Iran, bringing it here and spending it. There's nothing done against them. The the government knows it. They're not doing anything. And I think the first step would just really listening to Iranians who are in Canada and in Iran are supporting them.
Anything that happens in Middle right now, whether it's Hezbollah of Lebanon, what's happening in Yemen. Well, Yemen is technically proxy service with Iran and Saudi Arabia, period. But even what's happening in in in Israel right now with with Hamas, people need to understand that that it's not Palestinians per se that are doing this. It's Hamas that's being funded. It's it's not a war between Jews or Muslim or or Israelites or Palestinians.
It's a war between Hamas, a terrorist group funded by Islamic regime in Iran. It's it's a war between Hamas, a terrorist group funded by Islamic regime in Iran, again, I guess Israelis. And not just that. I guess Iranians within Iran as well. So we wanna call it proxy war.
You wanna call it direct war funded by by by by by the Iranian regime. You can put as many names as you like on that but at the end of the day, as long as, we like to say the head of snake in Iran is there, it is gonna go on. It's gonna continue happening. Again, Iranian people are fighting it as much as possible and dying day in, day out. And I think at this point, all we ask for is just for for for for for Canadians, for Americans, for anyone in the Western countries that honestly watches the news and all they hear is Iranian parliament chanting death to America already or Israel know that that's not Iranian people in Iran doing it.
That's just Islamic regime. It's minority within Iran, and they have the power, unfortunately, and the money do what they're doing right now.
Speaker 0: And 1 last question. You know, certainly the shah of Iran, he was no boy scout. But given the revolution of 79, I would imagine is it safe to say that most Iranians in Iran have buyer's remorse for that revolution and bringing
Amidst a huge police presence, thousands gather at Toronto’s Mel Lastman Square to show their solidarity for Israel
Some pro-Hamas demonstrators showed up to taunt the pro-Israel crowd.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
The Liberals try to wipe Parliament honouring a Nazi from official House records. Conservatives oppose the motion: "Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it," says MP Marty Morantz. http://FireRota.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent to remove recognition of an individual from the House of Commons Debates and multimedia recording. Speaker 1 asks for unanimous consent but is met with opposition. Speaker 2 expresses disappointment and compares the incident to the importance of learning from history. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating that the discussion is becoming more of a debate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like to ask for unanimous consent to adopt the following motion. That notwithstanding any standing order, special order or usual practice of the House, the recognition made by the Speaker of the House of an individual present in the galleries during the joint address to Parliament by His Excellency Volodymyr Zelensky, he struck from the appendix of the House of Commons Debates of Thursday, September 21, 2023, and from any House multimedia recording? Thank you,
Speaker 1: Paul, yes, the honorable. I guess we have to go to the, we'll ask about unanimous consent, then go to it. All those opposed to the honorable, ministers moving the motion will please say nay. We don't have unanimous consent. We have another Order, order.
Speaker 2: It goes without saying that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. What happened on Friday was shameful and brought embarrassment to this chamber. It was an ugly reminder of what survivors of the Holocaust know too well that we must never forget deleting the text of the speaker's words from Hansard, whatever
Speaker 1: I'm going to have to interrupt. I'm I Steve, this I'm afraid I'm afraid, I I'm afraid it's getting into debate more than anything else.
WATCH: Parliament gives standing ovation to Ukrainian Nazi
As many as 2,000 Waffen SS soldiers of Ukrainian heritage, including Yaroslav Hunka, changed their identities and masqueraded as 'refugees' before capture to seek refuge in Canada in the 1950s
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
“LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE”. People are coming together at Parliament Hill for the 1 Million March 4 Children. MORE: http://StopClassroomGrooming.com #1MillionMarch4Children
500 Error: We're sorry, but something went wrong.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
"You've destroyed this country!" PM Trudeau embarrassed by protesters while leaving the venue for his meeting with the President of Portugal. The convoy of SUVs were idling while he was at the ceremony indoors. http://RebelFieldReports.com
reSee.it AI Summary
In this eye-opening documentary, Rebel News reporter Drea Humphrey and Matt Brevner delve into the buried truth of the Kamloops Indian Residential School. Uncovering the misleading story that captivated the nation, they reveal what is truly known about the secrets hidden beneath its soil.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
FULL DOCUMENTARY | Kamloops: The Buried Truth Rebel News reporter Drea Humphrey and Matt Brevner take you on an investigative journey to uncover the truth about a story that misled a nation, the truth about what is actually known about what lies beneath the soil at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the discovery of a mass grave at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in Canada, initially reported to contain the remains of 215 children. However, it was later clarified that there were 200 probable graves, with no excavations conducted to confirm the presence of bodies. The lack of action from the RCMP, BC coroner's office, and the Catholic Church, which ran the school, is criticized. The speakers express frustration with the difficulty in obtaining information and responses from various organizations involved in the investigations. They also mention the discovery of a juvenile rib bone, emphasizing the need for further investigation and accurate information dissemination. Overall, the community calls for accountability, repatriation, justice, and a proper investigation into the bone discovery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The discovery of the mass grave is gripping the nation tonight at CTV's Travis Prasad now with more on how the country is honoring the 200 and 15 lives taken too soon.
Speaker 1: As Vancouver's civic buildings lower their flags, so do other parts of the country. In Ottawa, Canada's flag atop the peace tower flies at half mast. Parts of Nova Scotia will lower their flags on Monday. Buildings in Greater Toronto already have. Many will stay this way for 215 hours, 1 hour for each of the young lives lost.
Many of
Speaker 2: you know that just over a year ago. The discovery of the remains of 215 children was found at the Kamloops Indian Residential School at the Islamic First Nation. But what if I were to show you that what I just said wasn't true? And that in fact, A year later, not a single body has been found. The developing story out of British Columbia, First Nations says the remains.
More than 200 children have been located.
Speaker 3: The first time the pope has publicly addressed the discovery of remains buried
Speaker 1: in Former residential school in Kamloops. Nearly 1 week after the world learned
Speaker 2: the remains of 215 indigenous children were found on the grounds of a former residential school in I'm Drea Humphrey, a black indigenous Christian woman. I'm a wife and a mother who would never want any harm to come to my children or any child because every child matters. I'm also a journalist with Rebel News, one that has a hunger for bringing you the truth, even if that truth is gonna be hard for you to swallow or even if there are forces making it hard for me to find the truth in the 1st place. Now the things I just listed that make me who I am are exactly why when I read of that 1st press release from the Tkamloops Shwemik First Nation ban that had the heart wrenching claim that 200 and and 15 former students' remains from the Kamloops Indian Residential School had been confirmed to be discovered. I, Like many across the world grieved.
And it was being claimed to have been discovered by politicians and media outlets. I like to be in a mass grade.
Speaker 3: I wanna talk about the heartbreaking news. The 215 children were found buried at the former Kamloops residential coup. 215 children. Think of their loving families that they were ripped away from. Think of the communities that never saw them again.
Think of their hopes, their dreams, their potential of all they would have accomplished, all they would have to come. All of that was taken away.
Speaker 4: I struggled to find words to express my horror and grief At the discovery of these remains of 215 first nations children, I Realized it's because there are no words that can do justice to those children and the countless others who died alone and scared and Far from
Speaker 5: home, far from the families who love them.
Speaker 3: This weekend, my 9 year old son, Jack, asked me why the flags were lowered to half mast In Ottawa. I had the difficult task of explaining to him the terrible news of the graves of children found at the site of a residential school. Kids aren't supposed to die at school, dad, he said to me. As a parent, it is devastating to think of 215 children, this mass accredit
Speaker 6: is a painful reminder of the genocide. And what we have to commit to is that in faith in light of this genocide, Canada has to make some real tough decisions.
Speaker 7: There have been rumors of some kind of mass grave on this site for decades. And
Speaker 8: A pair of shoes for each child who was sent to school and never returned, some as young as 3, their bodies discovered buried at an Indian residential school in Canada. Rumors circled for decades at Kamloops, once and The largest boarding school in the country run by the Catholic church. Stories of missing children and grave Decades on, confirmation through the use of ground penetrating radar, a mass burial on School grounds, 215 bodies.
Speaker 5: The people that did that, sometimes I cried. I I tried to hide my anger.
Speaker 1: The remains of 215 children been found in a mass grave at a former residential school in Canada.
Speaker 7: And if he's as people stop by here to reflect, some sting, Some cry, others stare in stoic silence. 215 pairs of shoes representing young lives Cruelly taken and then buried for decades.
Speaker 2: Well, the remains of 215 children have been found in a mass grave in Canada. A mass grave. It Sounded like evidence that these children had been slaughtered and disposed of in some pit.
Speaker 1: Now to
Speaker 2: honor those children and the public, myself and my BC Producer, Matt Breckner, made the journey to Kamloops to bring you an in-depth report from the school grounds for such horrors had taken place. We affected to find a community in Greece. We expected to find a renewed reminder of a dark chapter in Canada's history when children were snatched away from their families and forced to attend a government mandated residential school. But what we never expected to find was that the claims about the discovery which preceded a cultural wildfire that sparked a national identity of shame and engulfed Christian places of worship and accelerated the progress of 1,000,000 of dollars to be released for unmarked graves from our federal government. We never expected that those claims and would not be substantiated.
And that those who were the closest to the claims were either unwilling or unable to provide us with clarity. Lastly, we certainly didn't expect that I would seem to be the only news reporter in the whole country, maybe even the whole world at the time, who would publicly question why this is the case. Unlike the mass grave claimers at the New York Post The national post whose journalistic light bulbs took a year to turn on or the rest of Canada's legacy media, which is still keeping people in the dark. I never stopped looking for the answers to the questions we couldn't find 1 year ago. And that's why right now, you're about to go with us during our 2 day investigation where this reported gruesome discovery began.
You'll watch and listen to raw unseen footage of our investigation with the RCMP, elite investigator at the BC coroner's office, an accomplished researcher. You'll learn about a police report and how it was handled by the RCMP MEP that relates to the discovery at the former residential school, and you'll even hear directly from Cookby at Roseanne Casimir, the to come up with First Nations herself. You'll also see what it takes and news reporter who's had every journalistic door shut on her for a year to sort through these facts and fictions on what has become one of the most impactful declarations made in Canadian history. And one more thing, Don't shoot the messenger.
Speaker 1: Already rolling. What do you think we're gonna find?
Speaker 2: You know, I I think we're gonna find that the people who possess all the answers are not gonna be that interested in giving more answers, but But I hope that I find that I eat my words, and they do.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I hope so too. They weren't Interesting talking to us a year ago. I don't know if much has been changed.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Me either. But that's why we're doing this. It's very important. So let's see.
Kamloops.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get through
Speaker 2: it. And so off we went down Highway 1 through Merit. And one of the first things we noticed when we arrived to Kamloops is that the wooden crosses that had been set up to remember the children Who were missing from the Kamloops Indian Residential School were no longer there. We'll get back to why that matters soon.
Speaker 1: And Even though it's not dark, they do get a lot of smaller stuff. Okay. At Any point has the RCMP
Speaker 2: investigated.
Speaker 1: And Listen, what are you doing right now?
Speaker 2: Right now, I am contacting the Kamloops of for I don't even know, too many times to count over the last year to see if at some point, they plan to of the gates. What was originally reported as the remains of 215 children who were students at the Kamloops yen residential school as a crime scene at all. So far, it's always been the consistent answer. We are waiting for instruction from the Banned Government on what to do next. What is a Banned government.
Banned governments are managed by elected councils according to the laws of the Indian Act. Today, some bands prefer to call themselves first nations. In other words, The banned government is a group of elected politicians.
Speaker 1: If there's claim of human remains found on-site, don't the arts If you have a responsibility to go in there.
Speaker 2: You would think so, the BC corners as well. But the excuse behind why they or not is due to the sensitive nature of the culture, which brings me to the next point and something I haven't seen talked about at all Oh, really? And anybody who is starting to shed light on this situation like we did from the get go. There was an apparent rib bone found. No one's talking about the rib bone, the juvenile rib bone that this expert, doctor says was surfaced on the ground.
Who is the expert that made this discovery? Meet doctor Sarah Bollier. Doctor Billier is a modern conflict anthropologist that works as a faculty associate in the Community Health and Social Innovation Hub at the University of the Fraser Valley. She has experience with excavation and using ground penetrating radar technology, GPR, And it was her research that the band relied on to initially tell the world that the remains of 215 former students that was confirmed to be found at the school. Except weeks later, doctor Bouley changed the story.
Speaker 4: The total number of burials and missing children at the Kamloops Indian Residential School landscape is currently unknown as this was a that was a preliminary investigation. My report identifies some of these probable locations. There remain over 160 acres that still require surveying before these numbers can be finalized. From my preliminary findings in May to today's results, reports providing additional information related to disturbances from archaeological impact assessments, as well as construction in parts of this area were subsequently provided to me. These reports were reviewed in order to determine which of these locations overlapped with the GPR survey areas.
After this review, it was determined that there remain 200 targets of interest in these preliminary results. Again, here, I must indicate that this is the first part of an investigation with a knowing and oral histories that tells us that there remain much more work to be done.
Speaker 2: 200 probable graves, targets of interest, anomalies. In other words, There could be more graves or there could be none at all. Stated she chose the location that was surveyed by GPR based on the following.
Speaker 4: Between May 21 24th, 7,000 square meters of land, just under 2 acres was covered in the location of the apple orchard at the Seswetmink Museum and Heritage Park. This area of interest was chosen for the survey based on a number of factors. First, The knowledge keepers oral histories that recall children as young as 6 years old being woken in the night to dig holes for burials in the apple orchard. Second, a juvenile rib bone that surfaced in the same area third, a juvenile tooth that was excavated from a shovel test pit during an impact assessment conducted by Simon Fraser University's archeology department. A juvenile tooth is not an indicator of loss of life, but given both discoveries, the possibility should not be discounted.
Speaker 2: So has the BC coroner's office even investigated this discovery of a juvenile
Speaker 1: and and
Speaker 2: Thank Hi. I was just curious. This is kind of a weird question. What is the rules surrounding if I found or someone found a possible bone? And I don't know if it's human or whatnot, but I'm not sure if the person is comfortable sharing that information.
What are the rules surrounding I'm not sure. So I'm Yeah. Somebody has found the bone, but I'm not sure they are comfortable sharing it. So I was just wondering what the BC Corner's role is when
Speaker 1: and and Is that okay?
Speaker 2: Sure. And what's, you said they're the ID specialist? Thank you for that. Of course. And just to see if I will check which region and calling from?
BC.
Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you so much. Bye. So we wait for the IVs. Okay.
Is is Yes. It is. I'm calling, from the corners. I understand you spoke for this reception earlier about both. Yeah.
It's kind of
Speaker 2: a weird question, but, my question is, yes. Definitely. Elite. If someone believes they found what might be a human phone, but they're kind of, like, scared to talk about it, I was Wondering, like, what is the breaking up a lot.
Speaker 1: I don't really hear you very well, sorry.
Speaker 2: Okay. I'm just gonna pull over for a second. Can you just bear with me a minute?
Speaker 1: I can get and better reception here.
Speaker 2: Can you hear me better now?
Speaker 1: Yes. You're hearing me well now.
Speaker 2: Okay. Sorry about that The Bluetooth. So basically, if someone found a bone, they're not sure exactly if it's human, but they think it's human, but they're also hesitant attempt to say something. I'm trying to encourage the person to say something. So I was just wondering, what is the BC coroner's, like, what happens in that situation?
What are you guys obligated to do? I would imagine you're supposed to look at it or
Speaker 1: something. Yeah. I mean, typically, people just were either taken into local RCMP detachment or, you know, send photos to the RCMP, but you can also send photos directly to us. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: This ID specialist is right. Feet. I mean, anybody who finds a bone most likely is gonna go to the RCMP except when I reached out to the RCMP, they said they received no such at port at the time. And, also, when I reached out to doctor Bollier to see if she planned on letting them know about the juvenile rib bone. She did not respond.
And what is a juvenile bone anyways? The word juvenile simply means young, immature, underdeveloped.
Speaker 1: The thing the the easiest first thing to do is just to send some photos so that we can determine whether or not it is human and and if something needs to be investigated. Right. So, yeah, I mean, if if the person doesn't want to take it into over CMP disaster, that's that is I can give you an email address Okay. That you can pass on, then they can just, take a couple of photos, you know, with a cell phone and and send those.
Speaker 2: As somebody does find like a human phone, is the coroner's office obligated to investigate that though? Like do they have to Look at it or not necessarily all the time. No.
Speaker 1: Well, we're we're always going to investigate any sudden unexpected fact. And when a bonus We obviously don't know whether it is sudden unexpected. Right. There's also the possibility that it could be at each of their historical remains. Mhmm.
This could require some further testing. But to be honest, 95 and percent of these cases cases where people call or take the phones into the police thing. Right. Okay. Well, this is really clearly like a like a human scholar's language.
Well, then it's obvious.
Speaker 2: Right. Okay. Yeah. Well, I'll I'll try to get, this person to maybe talk to the RCMP, but it's been a while, so I don't know if they're going to do that. And they were Kinda like, oh, you know, if you know, it's it's fine.
It's from something before. So if it was, like, in
Speaker 1: sorry? Yeah. There are there There are there are hundreds. Actually, just just over 2,000 historical missing persons in BC dating back to the and There's remains out there somewhere and, you know, that spouse is a family waiting to try and figure out where their loved ones are, so we definitely would encourage It's being recorded, and it's been a while, that's fine. We get that happens all the time.
Speaker 2: Did you just catch that? 2,000 missing historical people in BC since the '50s. Now that makes sense since in 2019, the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls found that BC had twice the national rate of missing people. And despite Kamloops being a small city, it's RCMP have had to deal with as high as 1,000 missing person cases a year. So when an anthropologist like doctor Beaulieu announces that a juvenile rib bone was found surface anywhere in Kamloops, let alone right beside what much of the world believes is an unmarked gravesite filled with hundreds of missing children from across of Canada.
Shouldn't that mean that all parties, including the band's primary objective should be repatriation? Repatriation, the deep spiritual connection most indigenous communities have for their dead, including reverence for ancestors and the cultural necessity feet to return them home.
Speaker 1: You will find them all and take it home and
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Put it in a shelf. And then later Hang on.
Speaker 9: Maybe I should maybe I should report this to someone.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But I can give you our email address if
Speaker 9: they would rather come straight to us going through
Speaker 1: the police. That's also fine. Okay. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Your email? So it's just And then if someone like, what if it was myself, And I was like, someone's claiming that they found what they think is a human bone, but I don't have a picture of it, and then I send you the email, and I do have, like, video or audio of them saying that. Like, would you guys have have to do something. Much we
Speaker 1: can no. And for with that, there's not really much we can do unless it's unless we determine that it is actually actually take a look at the remains of the term that they really are human and and it should be investigated. But yeah. I mean,
Speaker 9: you know, There's there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people. I don't know if that's something that may help you convince them. There are a lot of people out there looking for missing loved ones.
Speaker 2: So Yeah. Exactly. And from agents. Even from recent times. Right?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. From the feeding, you know, for the last
Speaker 9: 8 nights of fifties. Like I said, right up until This year, you know, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of
Speaker 9: people out there still missing. So But
Speaker 2: on the flip side, if someone claims that's, like, component might not be the case unless you guys have really investigated it. Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. And that's not that that is my
Speaker 9: area of and I've looked
Speaker 1: at tens of thousands of human and nonhuman bones. That's what I do, so I don't expect other people to have that. Right. And experience and knowledge. And he he surprised the number of people who say, you know, I'm a doctor.
I'm a paramedic. It's Definitely, you don't know that it's definitely not. Awesome.
Speaker 2: Now, I remember like with the whole children in the unmarked graves and camels because this is the area where it's found, like, the bones. I'm not talking about that, but I'm just saying, I remember they used some sort of technology where they found those bones. So if there's more in this area, can we somehow, like, use that to see if anything's Under the ground or something that is not an efficient way to find out if there's more? Like, if they're correct that this is a bone, could we used whatever that equipment is. I think it was called radar or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the problem is that's actually not a very efficient way of doing it unless you really know where you're looking because you basically have to actually cover every square It took grounds with the radar. So if you have anything or, you know, if you have large areas, it's it's almost impossible of and the problem with that technology is that it picks up anomalies. It doesn't actually you know, it doesn't pick up a bone specifically. It picks up something that's different and Not the earth.
Speaker 10: This is a crime scene. This is a crime. It's a crime against humanity. It's a crime against children, And it has to be investigated. And that's what these ground penetrating radar, processes have done is they've given us the evidence.
They've given us undisputable, proof that genocide did occur in Canada. And Those crimes have to be investigated as with any crime, and those crimes have to be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: O. So it takes up rocks. It takes up, you know, in all sorts of any anomaly where it's different. So
Speaker 2: Well, maybe I'm employees. That's not Oh, sorry. Go on. Yeah.
Speaker 1: No. It's just it lets you know exactly where you're looking. It's not the most is the term that the technology is.
Speaker 2: Okay. But if you look in the same spot that this phone was found, like, then maybe if there's other stuff Under there, you can find there or no. Like, I think maybe we're talking about a different equipment because they said that they they found, like, the children, right? Eight. But I don't think they dug them off.
I can't remember. I think it was called ground penetrating radar something. Are you talking about the
Speaker 1: same thing? Graves. Oh, okay. Yes. So what they have found is Anomalies would have would appear to be graves, but not no.
No. No. No. No. That hasn't yet.
So Oh. Yeah. It's bad. But, and have you noticed and right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Did you guys do any work, like for the gravesite to to see, like, the No. We have
Speaker 1: we have been involved with that.
Speaker 2: Oh, okay. Okay. Thank you for calling me back.
Speaker 1: And Wish me luck. Yeah. You're happy. Wish me luck. You're welcome.
Okay. Bye. Okay.
Speaker 2: Bye. Well, the BC office, most trained. One of their specialists in ID ing says that ground penetrating radar is not adequate for determining the claim that was said to the world which was 215 bodies of these relocated.
Speaker 1: That's crazy. We have to put that, basically, this whole call up uncut. Oh, you're stopped now? No. I'm Recording the whole thing.
What I'm saying is they had known that we were in media, there's no chance you would have said that.
Speaker 2: Oh, there is no chance. Because I've reached out as media. And you don't get that quality of answer when you're going to inform the public about something.
Speaker 1: And you charging you've been emailing for a year.
Speaker 2: I have been emailing them from a year. They haven't even responded sometimes, but initially, they did respond. They did say that they were were not involved in the investigation at the beginning. But then they just stopped answering. So you would think after a year goes by, if this is, you know, egg meat thing is out there indicating it's almost like a massacre of sorts.
Speaker 6: This mass grave is of A painful reminder of the genocide. And what we have to commit to is that in face in light of this genocide, Canada has Has to make some real tough decisions.
Speaker 2: You would think the RCMP and the BC coroner's office would be involved folks in such a horrific investigation.
Speaker 1: It's crazy to me that she said, basically, over 95 and Of all bones that we find that people think, even experts, quote, unquote, think are are human bones aren't.
Speaker 2: I wonder What the things that could be underground are.
Speaker 1: Well, it could be rocks, 50 tree roots. It could it could literally be anything by that that sounds to that.
Speaker 2: Now I'm not the only one who is perplexed as to why the RCMP and BC coroner's many resources don't seem to be needed when it comes to investigating this culture shifting discovery and apparent juvenile rib bone as well. I spoke to an Ontario based researcher who is part of a team looking into the unmarked grave discoveries at Canada's residential schools. She shared some of my questions and And decided it would be appropriate to file a police report about doctor Bouley's claims to see if the alleged rib bone and unmarked gravesite discoveries would finally be investigated by the RCMP as a potential crime scene. For the purposes of this documentary, we will be keeping this researcher's identity anonymous.
Speaker 11: Hello? Hello. Oh, hello. Hi. Is this the the number to make a report?
It is. Okay. I would like to make to report about, a child's bone that was found on on a property in Kamloops.
Speaker 9: Do you
Speaker 12: know the address?
Speaker 11: I don't. But It's at the, site of the former Kamloops Residential School.
Speaker 1: Which street is that near?
Speaker 11: Oh, I don't know. I'm not in Kamloops. So I don't Where
Speaker 1: did you where did you hear of this news?
Speaker 11: Well, I I heard of it when, And, when they were doing the the, searching of the yard with the with the ground penetrating radar, they had, An archaeologist who was there called Sarah Beaulieu. And she mentioned in her, in her press employees that she had, that a tourist had apparently found a juvenile rib bone on the property. I think it's near the museum. They have a park there.
Speaker 12: And when was this, news release?
Speaker 11: Oh, it was about it was a year
Speaker 12: ago. Okay. And may I ask why you're calling us today?
Speaker 11: Well, because we've just passed The the the year anniversary of when, apparently, 200 graves were discovered At the site of the former Kamloops, residential school. And it made me think, well, If there are graves there, then the police should be securing that site. Otherwise, anything could happen. There, you know, it really needs to be secure. If this is indeed, a site of burials, and I know that there was just they just hired a woman to, she's called an interlocutor.
And David, who's, he he hired her, appointed her, and they're they're looking at these sites as criminal sites as, yeah. I think they're calling them criminal sites.
Speaker 12: Okay. Okay. I can make a file, and then I'll have an officer follow-up with you if you'd like.
Speaker 1: Yes, please.
Speaker 12: Okay. And when you do receive the phone call, just, so they have it'll come up as a private or no caller ID.
Speaker 11: Okay. Thank you.
Speaker 12: K. Bye. Bye for now.
Speaker 2: Now that the CMPs. We never received a report. Excuse was no longer valid. We had to wait to see if the officer who called back this researcher Would do any investigative work about that juvenile rib bone. In the meantime, why not see what else we could find out about the 51 former students that the Canadian Centre For Truth and Reconciliation show died during the 80 years the school was in operation.
Were there any death certificates that show some of these children were buried in a nearby cemetery on the reserve or buried further away in a cemetery on a reserve close to the child's family, like some other children who were marked as residential school student deaths in Canada. Would their cause of death be unknown, suspicious, or tied to the leading cause of death at the time, tuberculosis, and other major causes of death such as influenza or the poor living conditions the children were subjected to in part due to the lack of government funding as well as accidents.
Speaker 5: I used to go to school here. We used to be back here where we used to have the apples and all that there.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 5: We're the cows. We've had the cows and pigs and chickens and all that. And that day, we had to, look after The boys used to go after the boys for the horses, lord. Then we had we had that hay that hail, then we used to jump So all that hail over to the horses and cow and what? And we're fighting and jumping.
It's all that hail coming down. And the guy and the guy and the the boy, the cousin, it threw it threw that on the ground And we forgot when we're we're jumping, we're running and running and around, jumping over the hay the hay when when we found out And one of our cousins had fell into that dream, and then what he did, they talked to me, and they killed him right there in the and the team, and we see it. And we we were all happy to see him, but when they come out when they come out to death when he died, That's hurt at us because and I was a really good friend then. What happened? I was really good.
He was just like a half brother and everyone when he died. And we we even cry too.
Speaker 2: Were there a lot of accidents like that that happened here?
Speaker 5: Yeah. We've done over here, and some of them some of them girls. And the girl side. That was a good day down there for the girls and the washing for the water, and we do the washing clothes and all that.
Speaker 2: We thought the best place to dig for more answers about the of Indian Residential School student deaths would be at the archives inside of the reserves at the museum, which had been closed off up to me and the public a year ago when I tried to do so.
Speaker 1: So you're saying it's it's closed? Yes. So. And Sorry. You're saying it's
Speaker 5: thanks.
Speaker 1: For renovations because there's there's obviously the development that was announced Last summer, but I didn't under I didn't realize that there was any excavation of the site to confirm the the, No.
Speaker 5: It's been in GPR. Right.
Speaker 2: Ground penetrating radar?
Speaker 1: Right. Oh, I I understand that, but It was my understanding that that had to be, substantiated. Right? Like in one of the last and You still have to do work. Right.
Speaker 12: Go ahead.
Speaker 1: Sorry. On the on the last press release, it was, I believe, It was stated that it was the GPR that, is alluding to, findings. But it needed to be confirmed still. So I'm sorry, I just I'm confused. Was that confirmed?
Speaker 2: We have confirmed it with ground penetrating radar that our ancestral remains on-site.
Speaker 1: Okay. I see. And So is that is that the unmarked mass grave? Yes. So it was a mass grave?
Speaker 2: Yes. It was drowned penetrating radar. There are ancestral remains on-site. And
Speaker 1: Okay. I see. So is that is that the unmarked passphrase?
Speaker 2: So the museum is still closed. And year later, and when you call to ask, the first response was when you said, why is it closed? The first response is, some people Don't know this, but we have located 215 bodies in the Heritage Park. Here we are a year later even after the band has come out and clarified in their final report that it's 200 probable graves and that excavation would have to take place in order to actually confirm what's under there that people still working in that same same location, that same vicinity, and working and closing things still believe the original story, which was two 115 bodies.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And she said it was a mass grave.
Speaker 2: Alright. Did I play that part?
Speaker 1: That was interesting. Did I play that part? At the very end. Next. Yeah.
Yes. So what's the Vasquez? Or we can just tell her. Oh, okay.
Speaker 2: How does that and how did the people right there who walk by the school every single day not know the facts. This wasn't a mass grave. And we don't know if or how many bodies there.
Speaker 1: Well, if is a big one. We don't know if there's anybody there.
Speaker 2: Still closed. I learned after this that even if the museum had been open to the public, much of the archives that would have been of particular interest to a journalist covering this story were removed from the museum and sent to the National Center For Truth and Reconciliation in Manitoba. But Matt's call to the museum pointed out something else important. It's someone who works right next to this probable gravesite in the museum where the history of the Kamloops Indian Residential School is normally kept still believes the misinformation about 215 children being discovered there in a mass grave, how many others in the community are still in the dark as well? I'm sure you've heard about the discovery of the unmarked gravesites.
Right? And then we're also just asking people, in their own words, what they think happened there.
Speaker 13: Are you talking about an an event? Lent? Oh, like, what happened so that there were that many bodies in one space? Yeah.
Speaker 11: Like, just this Last year?
Speaker 2: Yeah. That that Oh,
Speaker 11: we just found they found was it, like, 700 unmarked graves on the property of the camera's residence? It was.
Speaker 1: Bodies? How many bodies? I don't know. Over 200. Of
Speaker 3: Bunch of dead bodies.
Speaker 2: Do you know how many?
Speaker 3: We thought it was 16 or something?
Speaker 2: Well, the 1st press release was 215 at that time. No.
Speaker 13: And 250 years. Okay. From what I know, which is admittedly ignorant, over 200 of young indigenous people were found in 1 space at the Secwepemc former residential school. So and Something tragic happened, from my perspective, it mishandling of and people disrespect historically. I guess I can't say what could even lead that to happen, but presumably, Whoever was running that organization, which I think is the church,
Speaker 2: church and the government, made
Speaker 13: some very bad decisions and so we're not in the best interest of Humanitarianism, and I it's murder? I'm not sure how the people to be honest, I don't know how people. They died. So, I think it's, like, a very tragic thing,
Speaker 14: and I'm hoping that people can use that as an opportunity to care more about, indigenous populations and, what they have to do to fight for their rights, fight for recognition, for land recognition. It's a really emotional thing. Like, even just thinking about it now, kinda shakes my chest a little bit. And, as guests and visitors to the uninvited guests to this land, I think it's really important for People like me to, take the time to listen to what those communities have to say and, recognize that, they've been through a lot And that there's, like, a lot that we can do to, make sure that they are getting their voices heard and, having action from government to, make sure that they're, yeah, being listened to.
Speaker 3: What happened there was a Catholic system that pulled people and children from their families and Small communities rounded them up like cattle and put them into a school without their culture and tried to assimilate them into A Catholic regime. The atrocities that were committed on those, those 215 is a small portion of what is all in Canada, to be honest. What I don't understand is how does a Catholic regime why are they exempt from the law? You know, these children, that, you know, all these spirits, they would never saw their family again. And the family who are in cycles of homelessness and And the different cycles that an indigenous community faces right now comes a lot from trauma.
Speaker 15: That's due with the Catholic church or what? Pretty much, ain't it?
Speaker 3: Why don't and They, take accountability. Never mind the pope coming here and and both smoke up our ass so I would be accountable for what they did.
Speaker 2: Well, there's been apologies.
Speaker 3: And But apology apologies only go so far.
Speaker 2: So what do you think is still needed?
Speaker 3: They just need to be accountable for what they did and and, reimbursing the people for what they went through and suffered, the families that lost. How do we even know who lost what? Right?
Speaker 2: Shortly after the discovery was given of the 215 bodies, the lady who discovered it, said that it's actually 200 probable graves, and they wouldn't know unless they actually did the excavation what is actually under the ground. Does it surprise you to know that they Still haven't done any excavations yet?
Speaker 1: Yes. I think so.
Speaker 10: Yeah. I think it's pretty important somebody should've been on it right away.
Speaker 2: Is it surprising to know that there's been no actual criminal investigation and no excavation of what's under the ground there? And
Speaker 13: In a year? Absolutely. I yeah. There should probably be more action taken by now to Really find out what the truth is, like, if we're talking about absolute truth, it's better that we all know it so we can address it and make reparations, absolutely. So, and I guess I don't under you know, there might be other issues around exhumation of bodies that takes a lot longer than
Speaker 2: you would think. I I like,
Speaker 13: I have no idea what the reasoning is, but a year seems like a long time to not have any answers. Right.
Speaker 2: They might not do any excavation at all. Of the victims.
Speaker 16: Yeah. That seems like the baseline to just at least take them up and find out why they died or how they died.
Speaker 2: And Who they are. Their the DNA. Yeah. Where they come from.
Speaker 13: Yeah. I think that
Speaker 16: Who is stopping that digging from happening? Sorry? Who is stopping that digging from happening?
Speaker 2: Well, that's a good question. That's kind of what we've tried to figure out for a year. When we talk to the RCMP, they say it's up to the ban if they want them to investigate it like a crime scene. When we talk to the BC coroners, they say the same thing.
Speaker 16: So what did the band say?
Speaker 13: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The band says that, they're not making any promises about excavating.
Speaker 1: And Well,
Speaker 13: I get yeah.
Speaker 16: If if you can't excavate, how much further can you go, really?
Speaker 2: How much further can we go towards truth, reconciliation, and repatriation for the children that are reported missing from Kamloops Indian residential school without truly knowing if some of them are buried beneath the soil there and why. It was time for us to return back to the school, to the museum, and to the band office a year later to see if we could find out the answer to that question As well as to see if we could find out what happened to those wooden crosses that lined the highway representing the 215 buried children, Which are more accurately now 200 anomalies under the ground. Why do I keep bringing up those crosses? Well, unlike the reports that came out about the unmarked graveside at Kamloops Indian Residential School, some other bands who announced the location of their unmarked gravesites near their schools prevented the mass gravesite rumors by clearly communicating from the beginning That although the graves were unmarked today, they were likely marked at the time of the burial. In doctor Bologie's final report without doing excavations, he claimed that the GPR findings were consistent with that of Christian burials at the time, Christian burials at the time were traditionally marked with small wooden crosses, much like the ones that were along the highway last of year.
So if there truly is a gravesite full of children's remains at the apple orchard near Kamloops Indian Residential School, is it possible that they too were once marked with small wooden crosses that broke down over time. And did the wooden crosses that were along the highway breakdown as quickly as in 1 year.
Speaker 1: Alright. So you're gonna go into the, the museum right now?
Speaker 2: Mhmm. Yeah. So let's allow me after whatever.
Speaker 1: You up there.
Speaker 2: So you were told it was closed still because of the discovery, and so I'm just gonna go. And, you know, now at this At this point, we're definitely looking into, the history of missing women and children because around 1,000 have gone missing in the last 12 the last 3 decades, sorry. So we're going to go. We're going to say that that's, what we're looking into. I'm going to try to get into the miles.
Of course, you're gonna see it's closed. I'm just gonna see what else I can find out.
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. Alright. Let's do it. Are You just gonna have, you just drop you off in front of your is that a trick?
Right? And Oh, he he distracted. Oh, shoot. Oh, gosh. Oh, he doesn't have to.
Speaker 5: What do we do?
Speaker 1: We have to talk to her. And I do. They are hi. Hi. Good.
Yourself? Good. Sorry. We just had
Speaker 3: a question.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We're doing, an update. And I did reach out to your DDS a few times, but I that. Oh, okay. But, we're just wondering because we came to get some people of the crosses that
Speaker 1: were lying out there. Okay. Yeah. They became very, very welcoming and, and And, like, very tough. So we had some of our our, individuals go and care of them?
Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna come back after I guess in this in Kamloops, it breaks down over little wooden crossroads. Yeah. And if you need to cover to that highway again?
That's it. It's very rough shape, but it's very of sad face and absolutely. Do you know when the museum still comes? I wanted to try to look at some of the archives to get some of
Speaker 2: the history and and everything.
Speaker 1: So are you recording? Yeah. Can you just ask? Sure. I mean, oh, maybe you could have.
What's the best way to reach you? Because I've tried, over a year's promise to try to connect for an interview or something. Okay. Well, I'm just I've got, Like, a 1,000,000 interviews. I bet.
I think you were just doing what it is. No. It was just a Oh. But, no, I've done a 1,000,000 interviews. Previously, like, before Christmas, it was going through with some point.
Yeah. And so, since then, is not a maternity. So if someone drop me something, then I would respond.
Speaker 2: Oh, I think it still says, koi when I reach out now, so maybe I need a new contact or whatever. But, we were curious can we get into the museum somehow? Or No.
Speaker 1: The museum is shut now.
Speaker 12: Oh, the museum is actually in the
Speaker 2: Oh, okay. So Wait. Yeah. That's where the archives are. Right?
Yeah. They can't access it.
Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah. How come the museum is shut down right now? Place for do you know how much longer?
Speaker 2: Where's the best place to get, like, the history, like, to look to archives? Right now,
Speaker 1: Right now, it's not my country's political.
Speaker 2: Okay. I have technical. So Well, I guess, I would like to come
Speaker 1: back and and just find out exactly where, you know, all that stuff is because, like, I know that if you're I feel like I know that. If you're talking about, like, records, like,
Speaker 9: Okay.
Speaker 1: And It has to go through process because it's a very sensitive information for the of the individual families on the home. Direct the environment. Yeah. And, of course, it also has to be done in a trauma in a wrong way. So Right.
There's other different protocols and So
Speaker 2: I've done a few reports on it, and I think the main, question most people ask is what is the time for excavation to find out, you know, what happened in the straight site. Well, for myself, I
Speaker 1: can
Speaker 13: Oh, so it is going
Speaker 1: to happen. There's gonna be expeditions. Identified.
Speaker 2: And then I know your specialist is getting expecting doctor polio. She said US did discover a juvenile rib bone, surface, I believe, was somewhere in special bed. So with her work Yeah. You need to contact I did. I tried.
Contact
Speaker 1: me on her work. Okay. All I can do is Yeah. That's what it's like to
Speaker 2: be trying. Okay. You have tried. Big stuff. I have tried.
Speaker 1: Is there a way that we could schedule it?
Speaker 2: Yeah. What's the best a few way.
Speaker 1: We've been trying to do this for a year. We haven't had any luck. We've had to get into this.
Speaker 2: We're the largest independent media in Canada. Was that it? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, honestly, I've got immediate You're you're over it. Yeah. Seriously. Because I know that right now, we just now have someone in place the of international standards because there's no public in Canada.
Right? So moving forward, I can't predict What's gonna happen? All I can say is
Speaker 2: we're working step by step. Yeah. The RCMP, are they involved in any of the investigations? They're gonna be pulled in here. You our local detachment.
Of
Speaker 1: So we do have a
Speaker 2: a tripart agreement to work quite closely because
Speaker 1: we're the local municipality. We We have a nice relationship with them as well, and so we have met with all of them. They're all on board with everything that's We're working with legal, we're working with message with reconciliation, we're working with now the interlocutor, and Lots of steps that are gonna take place. Yes. So international, is that you mean the the UN's guidelines for Oh, yeah.
Because There's, like, new process like this here in Canada. So are they the administrative body that's overseeing this project? I don't know. Okay. It's just like a giant Yes.
We have met with you. We have this since. That's Yeah. Well, I'm it's
Speaker 2: a pleasure to finally meet you. Yes. I'm before the they told me that Raquel was lunging all that previously. Yeah.
Speaker 1: But now it's just kind of The contract ran out. And so most media requests will come to the EAs that are in the administration. Mhmm. I I
Speaker 2: I had family members that also went to the medical schools back east, so the dates were a little bit different. And so it was, A very important story for me, and so I I understood, like, oh, it's hard to get out to, but then when you would see, legacy media do reports but inter, independent media So I'm glad to finally meet you and, It's crazy.
Speaker 1: We got an email. We drove up here from the mainland.
Speaker 2: So we and Yeah. I get an update.
Speaker 1: Honestly, I don't have an EA right now, so it's my and
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's all you're you're I am busy with
Speaker 1: the pope. I've been busy with the ministers. I've been busy with the, Memorial,
Speaker 2: and, you know, that was public health, and she'd been here for that. Yeah. Guys, we were covering everything up, like, all those You know, so trust me. It's not you, but, I've just been, like, busy busy busy busy. How did the conversation with the pope felt amazing?
Yeah. And he's coming in out to Canada. He's coming to Canada, and that was the ask.
Speaker 1: But, you know, again, I provided an invitation, and, yes, I expect I am just quoting he's not coming to Canada We're coming to Greece County.
Speaker 2: I know. I'm yeah. We might try to get out to where it is, but we have employees over there too. So that's good. Yeah.
So is Do you feel like reconciliation is happening now? Or I know that there was that some money was given and then maybe there were celebrations and then now there's more awareness. What do you think? Well, I wouldn't consider it there is money given. The 27,000,000 or, that hasn't been done before.
Oh, you guys haven't received
Speaker 1: and Sorry. Well, are are you recording me? I have my phone. Well, he turned dry. Anyway, I just wanna say thank you.
Okay. I assume my time is very limited. Yes. Well, thank you. And minutes to just give you
Speaker 2: Yeah. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of questions. There's a lot of people who
Speaker 2: We have not a lot
Speaker 1: of misinformation. We've been sharing all the informations. We're following the proper processes. And, honestly, and You know, I just really actually really heard the business card.
Speaker 2: I don't, but I can give you my email.
Speaker 1: I don't have a business card, but
Speaker 2: I can give you my information.
Speaker 1: I guess for one thing that was really inappropriate while you came here
Speaker 2: Well, we've recorded everything That's, yeah. I know. But it
Speaker 1: was very inappropriate because I said that this year was an interview. You saw him, acknowledged him turning his off, But yet you proceeded to do that. To me, that's, you know, to me, that's to me, a bad case in my mouth. For, and You know, I understand
Speaker 2: percent that's immediate. We represent the public, but I understand we are coming close. The public still has questions.
Speaker 1: The public There's a lot of questions that I've been answering a lot because I've been
Speaker 2: Right. And you just you clarified a lot of things here too to create here, and that's Yeah.
Speaker 1: The thing is, like, in the press release, you say that you speak the truth, and then you're not in control of international media outlets and how they spin things and how they create things. Right. So we're up here, like, just having this conversation with you so enlightens and our audience would love that so much. These are things to be straight.
Speaker 2: And the museum is I understand you're And the museum is still saying I'm not afraid. Time. I just feel I work for
Speaker 1: and people. Yeah. I speak the truth. Yeah. And I'm upholding our elders, our survivors.
I'm upholding their grace with dignity and honor and with utmost respect.
Speaker 2: Well, that was sticky, but at least we got some more answers for the public after a year of trying to do so. And I took Cook B's advice and headed to the RCMP on the reserve next since I haven't been able to get a response from them through my email. When we hopped back into the car, we got a call from the researcher who filed a report about the rib bone with the RCMP. She gave us an update, and I updated her on what just happened as well. No.
We just interviewed the chief. She had no clue who we were, and she Answered a lot of questions. She's pretty pissed off. She's pretty pissed off at me, because, you know, it wasn't an arranged interview. But I said, you know, I percent of the public, and they still have questions, and we tried for a year to get them.
So, you know, it's not the it's not the way I wanna do an interview either. I don't wanna do an interview like that, but my job is to sort fact from suggestions, from allegations, from fiction, and and Present all of that to the public, and that's what we're here to do. Now you filed the police report. Tell us how that went.
Speaker 9: I well, it's like taking the 1st call and getting operator number 85.
Speaker 2: Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 9: Walk us through it. It was now it's funny. She did wonder why I was calling, so so long the the, incident that the reward phone had been discovered a year ago. She wondered why I was calling now.
Speaker 2: Well, it got brought to your attention. Right? So
Speaker 9: Oh, it's it's the anniversary of, of the announcement. And I said I haven't I haven't heard that anything really had been that was Apple. Nobody had done anything. You know? Yes.
I I was wondering, you know, what about it is the kind of point? Yeah. She she she kept everything down, and she I don't think she was going to give me a file number, but I said, well, is it possible to get a file number? And she gave me a number. Mhmm.
So that's good. So it's very positive.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's good. Right.
Speaker 9: I didn't hear anything more. I know why I was calling.
Speaker 2: Well, this is a, international concern for for a lot of people. So,
Speaker 9: Because the college school told me they had thousands of calls. The one I spoke to last night, I looked up the other bed. What did you say they had a bed? Because I I was in bed. We called in, you know, thousands of calls from all around the world internationally.
Speaker 2: I bet. Because you would I think it was a crime scene. And so, you know, what did the constable tell you about, whether or not they were gonna investigate the, claim that there was a juvenile rip bone
Speaker 9: that had surfaced. So They're not going to.
Speaker 2: No? Well, Did he say he or she she say why?
Speaker 9: Oh, he said stuff for the past. He said we have we we're doing something that we reopened the file immediately, but, we are not really involved. He said, it's up to them to what they're going to do, whether they wanna excavate or whatever. Yeah. And that's why I said, well, okay.
What if you had before he mentioned the thousands of people falling. They said, well, what if you had 20 people calling up to pull the RCMP and T envelope saying, look. We're really we're really concerned about this. We think you've got to look into it. Wow.
Speaker 2: Well, that seems consistent with what we're finding. We did ask, Cookby, the chief about the RCMP and excavation, and she said they're making no promises of doing events. So
Speaker 9: But she did say she was going to
Speaker 2: years. Well, that's not a guarantee anymore. Well, you know, you've done amazing research And, you know, you did what a normal person would do when they find out someone found what could be a child's bone. It could be missing person from last year, 5 5 years ago, 10 years, and told the RCMP, and the RCMP is just not having it. I don't know if you followed, Sort of some of the reasons why the RCMP has sort of stepped back from this, but if you look online, you can see that, They were told that it could be a conflict of interest for the RCMP to be involved, and there were also allegations They were the RCMP were intimidating, the ground penetrating radar specialist.
Speaker 17: They are now beginning to question those who have made this story available. And unfortunately, in typical heavy handed and ham handed police way, they are Simply intimidating people rather than helping them. And I think that we need to, Have a discussion with the police about how they're handling it.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know if this is what's happening, but we do see in other areas in of Canada today where people get silenced because if they don't, they look like they're racist or what have you. Ago.
Speaker 9: Well, this was a very, a very personable, friendly, sincere young man I spoke to last night. Mhmm. And, He he was very forthcoming. In fact, he worked on reserve.
Speaker 1: Wow. That's
Speaker 9: awesome. Yeah. He was coming to the room and no. He was very, very forthcoming. And and I said, look.
It sounds like you're seeing peace hands. It's like, he laughed. He said, and Oh, no. And I got it. Oh, really?
I said, who would be trying to handle? So, like, who's what's going on? Of He he agreed with me. He agreed. He he said, you know, we should be looking into this, but but but we can't.
Speaker 2: Try to talk to the police. Well, I knocked on the door, and No one's answering. We do have some police vehicles here, so there should, I would think, be some people in the building. And And it's not supposed to be closed yet. So not sure what that's all and Hold up.
Here's an officer here. Maybe we can get someone out to it.
Speaker 1: Hi. How are you? I'm good. Do you have, somebody from media here today? No.
We don't have a media lead. We have done Oh. Employees. Yes. I've reached out to the city quite a few times, but I'm
Speaker 2: not getting a response. Christie mentioned that, you guys were here, but the This is closed. Yes. They're closed and more, but, usually not more, but the lady went home. Okay.
We're just, trying to get an update since it's been a year This is the discovery on how the RCMP has been working towards the investigation. Okay. So I'm assuming the 250? Yeah. Okay.
Well, and 200 probable grade now. Right? Not too 50. Okay. Yeah.
I don't I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: Bill Walls would be the best for him to get a hold of.
Speaker 2: Oh, and 8?
Speaker 9: Yeah. The staff sergeant here and
Speaker 2: Yeah. I I believe I've tried to reach him at all. Right it again? Right now, he's maybe he's out on
Speaker 1: the road busy, but, if you catch him on a Monday, he
Speaker 2: starts work about 7 o'clock. Okay. Last I did get a response. At the time, it was just waiting for the band to to see if our safety was gonna help. Do you know if anything changed there?
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure. Okay. That's the higher up that deal with that. Okay.
Speaker 2: Thanks so
Speaker 1: much for your help. Have a good one. Bye.
Speaker 2: Well, I guess they're actually closed at 4. Is it 4?
Speaker 1: 350. It's
Speaker 2: almost and So they closed their doors. There's a nice officer who gave us some info. He said reach out to Bill Wallace, who I believe I've already reached out to, But we will try again.
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so I did. And once again, I wasn't connected with sergeant Wallace. Instead, I was told by the RCMP's media liaison that Sergeant Wallace agrees that the ban remains the lead on this investigation. But what about the police report the researcher made about the tooth in the juvenile root bone, which has served as the only physical evidence to doctor Boulier's probable grades yet may not have anything to do with a former residential school student or even a human. In fact, just a Couple of months ago, 2 human bones were believed to be discovered at Kamloops airport.
And after the RCMP and the BC corners properly investigated those remains, it turns out that 1 bone did belong to a missing person, And the other belonged to a juvenile deer. So would a proper investigation for this juvenile rib bone that was found at the apple orchard near Kamloops Indian Residential School occur now? I reached out to another RCMP media liaison To ask her more generally, what is the RCMP supposed to do with this rib bone? I asked, If the RCMP became aware that a person found what they believe is a human bone, under what circumstances, if any, Would the RCMP begin an investigation to see if that bone was human? That officer responded that in every such instance, The RCMP would begin an investigation in which the RCMP would work in partnership with the BC coroner's service to determine the origin of that bone, and you and I both know that that has not been what's happened so far.
So then I asked if the RCMP is going to be doing their job pretty much. I gave them the file number that the researcher was given when she filed the report and the date, and call it incompetence, call it a coincidence, call it a cover up, But here is the response I received from a staff sergeant. I can confirm that the below noted file does not relate to the discovery of a discovery of a bone or tooth or the discovery of other human remains. An individual did make a report using the below noted file, but It was to inquire more generally and did not relate to the actual findings of any remains.
Speaker 11: Oh, hello. Hi. Is this the The number to make a report?
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 11: Okay. I would like to make a report about, a child's bone that was found on on a property in Kamloops.
Speaker 12: Do you know the address?
Speaker 11: I don't, but it's at the, state of the former Kamloops residential school.
Speaker 2: And so the cycle of struggles for a journalist trying to get the public the answers they deserve continues. So what do you think? Why a year later are so many people, eco leaders and even the media still spreading misinformation about what wasn't discovered at the Kamloops Indian Residential School and how many other false narratives do we still believe to be true today. If you have any information about a story you would like us to investigate, Please go to
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Prime Minister @JustinTrudeau is pressed on Canada's record-high immigration and the housing crisis and resentment among citizens it is fuelling. He says housing is a global challenge but is a "solvable problem," and makes no mention of slowing or reducing immigration levels.
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Chris Scott, Whistlestop Cafe owner, has all charges acquitted from allegedly breaching public health orders. "If it wasn't for TDF, Rebel News and everyone that supported and contributed to the crowdfunding, I would have never been able to do this." https://rebelnews.com/whistle_stop_cafe_owner_chris_scott_acquitted
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was acquitted of all charges relating to the Public Health Act of Alberta. I was arrested for serving hamburgers and pouring coffee, but the hearing took only 5 minutes and both sides agreed on the acquittal. I don't feel any different today than I did yesterday. I never felt despair because I knew this was part of the process when I took a stand against the public health restrictions. I'm happy with the outcome as I won't face fines. Thanks to Williamson Law, the Democracy Fund, Rebel News, and everyone who supported and contributed to the crowdfunding, I was able to fight against the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I was just acquitted of all of my charges relating to the Public Health Act of Alberta, in relation to me doing what normal business people do, which is engage in business. I was brought before the court, after I was arrested. And, I was made to answer for the alleged crime of serving hamburgers and pouring coffee. Well, I was acquitted on all charges today. The, the the hearing took approximately 5 minutes.
Neither side contested the application for, an acquittal, and it was all over and done with right away. How do I feel about at? Well, I don't feel any different today than I did yesterday. As a matter of fact, throughout this entire thing, I haven't had much feeling about the court process at all. I never felt, you know, despair or anything like that because I was dragged before the court.
I just that was part of the process, and I knew it was gonna happen. And I knew that was gonna happen when I took a stand against the public health restrictions anyway. So, No. There there is no I don't really have any feeling about it. I'm not jumping for joy.
Although, I am happy with the outcome. In that, I'm not gonna be annihilated with fines. Thank you to Williamson Law and to the Democracy Fund for crowdfunding and providing me with the legal report that I needed to do this, this fight. If it wasn't for the Democracy Fund, Rebel News, and everybody that supported and contributed to the crowdfunding, I would have never been able to do this. Would have never been able to stand up even more than a week against the government.
Whistle Stop Cafe owner Chris Scott acquitted after being accused of breaking Covid-19 public health orders
Chris Scott was acquitted on Monday after facing the wrath of Alberta's law enforcement for refusing to close his diner despite COVID-19 public health restrictions being imposed.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
David Menzies ventures to the picket lines of striking Public Service Alliance of Canada workers in search for answers, but only finds deafening silence. Visit Rebel News for more on this story by @TheMenzoid: https://rebelne.ws/3AgjpEt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they believe in a free press and if they think the public service is full of racists. Speaker 1 responds with "no" to both questions. Speaker 0 then questions why there is a demand for anti-racism training and asks if Speaker 1 has experienced racism. Speaker 1 refuses to comment. Speaker 0 expresses confusion about why Speaker 1 is on a picket line if they don't want to convey their message to the public. Speaker 1 continues to refuse to comment. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 has ever been victimized by a racist in the public service.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't believe in a free press? Okay. Now we heard that anti racism training is, is another demand. Is the public service, is it full of racist?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Well, so it might be. Right. Why why are there so many racist people in the public service? How about yourself, man? Why is a demand for anti racism training.
Have you been the victim of racism?
Speaker 1: No comment. No?
Speaker 0: Okay. It is a demand, though, isn't it, to have more for anti racism training?
Speaker 1: No comment means no comment.
Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. I I just don't understand why you're out on a picket line. Aren't you trying to convey your message to the public?
Speaker 1: No comment.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay then. How about yourself, man, have you ever been victimized by a racist in the public service?
First, three years of service interruptions due to COVID; now federal workers are on a nation-wide strike. Do Canadians really deserve this?
David Menzies ventures to the picket lines of striking federal workers in search for answers.
rebelnews.com
@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News
Pastor Derek Reimer: Calgary Pastor Derek Reimer has been charged and arrested for protesting drag queen story hour. He's been thrown out of a public library and now he's been taken to jail. Please make a donation to help save Pastor Derek Reimer: http://SavePastorDerek.com.