TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RedWave_Press

RedWave_Press
Posted - December 8, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Israel has nuclear weapons and the world's military superpower backing them. I doubt Hamas would use a nuclear weapon instantly; I say I have no idea. Bill asserts three seconds, claiming it's in their charter.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Ana Kasparian: “Israel has nuclear weapons… They have the world’s military superpower backing them.” Bill Maher: They have nuclear weapons in which they don’t use... If Hamas had a nuclear weapon how many seconds would it take before they used it on Israel?” Ana Kasparian: “I have no idea.” Bill Maher: “Three—three is the answer. Three seconds.” Ana Kasparian: “How do you know that Bill, come on?” Bill Maher: “Because it’s in their charter.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a sequence of war-related scenarios, making provocative comparisons and extreme claims about Israel, Hamas, and broader conflicts. Speaker 0 asserts that if Mexico occupied their land and then decided to cut off electricity and control inputs, it would be akin to Israel’s actions against Palestinians; he imagines a scenario where an occupying force could slaughter people for allegedly throwing rocks. Speaker 1 counters by noting Israel has nuclear weapons and that the world’s military power backs Israel. Speaker 0 asserts that Israel has nuclear weapons and that they do not use them, while Speaker 1 suggests Hamas would use a nuclear weapon in seconds if they had one, stating three seconds as the answer because it’s in Hamas’s charter. Speaker 0 asks how anyone could know that, and Speaker 1 cites the charter as justification. Speaker 0 argues that Hamas would be martyrs if they used a nuclear weapon against Israel, describing Hamas as having a death-cult view and noting that they strap suicide vests sometimes on children. He says people cannot see the moral difference between Hamas and Israel. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying they are not talking about extermination and notes that Basilel Smotrich and Ben Gavir have talked about exterminating the entire population of Gaza, while Speaker 0 claims the West Bank is another example and states that despite the West Bank having nothing to do with October 7, it is being annexed and that terror is being rained on innocent Palestinians, driving them from their homes. Speaker 0 acknowledges that what Hamas did on October 7 was a “fucking atrocity,” killing innocent people. He says he is willing to admit that atrocity, but he emphasizes his belief that the atrocities against civilians in Gaza are also significant. Speaker 1 concedes that the IDF and all armies commit war crimes in war and that “all wars are going to have atrocity.” Speaker 0 asks for acknowledgment of a double tap on a hospital; Speaker 1 describes the hospital incident as an old terrorist trick and confirms that such acts occur in war, but he emphasizes that all wars involve atrocities. The exchange references first responders and a vague memory of the event, with Speaker 0 asserting that first responders’ deaths and hospital strikes are part of the ongoing discussion, while Speaker 1 frames them within the broader context of war crimes by all sides. Overall, the dialogue juxtaposes occupation, nuclear deterrence, and moral atrocity claims on both sides, with explicit references to statements by Israeli political figures, Hamas, and the general conduct of war by all parties.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But, Bill, Speaker 1: let's say thousand years. Speaker 0: Our country was occupied by Mexico. Right? We have a bunch of people who are occupying our land, and then they decide, you know gonna land. Let me finish. Let's say Mexico decides, you know what? We're gonna leave, but we're gonna control their electricity, What goes in? What comes out? Speaker 1: Because they were attacking Speaker 0: you. We're gonna mow the lawn and just, like, randomly decide we're gonna slaughter people because they allegedly threw rocks. Speaker 1: They Speaker 0: They have literally nuclear Speaker 1: Well, they didn't allegedly. Speaker 0: I mean, Israel has nuclear weapons, Bill. They have nuclear weapons. Speaker 1: And they don't and that's Speaker 0: They have the world's military superpower backing them. Speaker 1: Right. Well, they have nuclear weapons, which they don't use. If Hamas had No. Speaker 0: No. They don't use it. But to pretend If Speaker 1: if Hamas had a nuclear weapon, how many seconds would it take before they used it on Israel? Speaker 0: I have no idea. Speaker 1: Three. Three is the answer. Three seconds. Speaker 0: Then they How do you know that, Bill? Come on. Speaker 1: Because it's in their charter. Speaker 0: If they used a nuclear weapon against Israel, I'm pretty sure the very land that Hamas cares about would be done for. Speaker 1: Well then they would be martyrs, and that would be a good thing because that's their death cult view of the world. It's a good thing when you die. That's why they strap suicide vests sometimes on children. The fact that you can't see the moral difference between these two sides always amazes me alone. Speaker 0: Actually don't see the moral difference when you have, like, Basilel Smotrich and Ben Gavir literally talking about exterminating the entire population of Gaza. Okay. Speaker 1: We're not talking about exterminating Speaker 0: These are not they are. I mean, the statements are brazen. They're upfront. They're honest. This is what they actually wanna do. Well, I mean, the West Bank is another example. Speaker 1: It's in Hamas. Speaker 0: The West Bank had nothing to do with what happened on October 7, but they're annexing that land anyway. They're raining terror on innocent people, innocent Palestinians. They're driving them out of their homes. Like, listen. I am willing to admit, because it's the truth, that what Hamas did on October 7 was a fucking atrocity Oh, wow. Killing innocent people Speaker 1: admit that. Speaker 0: But but you have a difficult time at least acknowledging the atrocities that have been committed against innocent civilians in Gaza. Speaker 1: Well, it depends on what you call an atrocity. All wars are going to have atrocity. Speaker 0: A double tap on a hospital? Speaker 1: All war Speaker 0: A double tap on a hospital? So when I the first responders show Speaker 1: don't know exactly what you're talking about. I vaguely remember the thing. Right. Yeah. First of all, that's an old terrorist trick. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: That's what they do all the time. Speaker 0: Okay. But you are you at least gonna acknowledge that the IDF doing that was wrong? Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm sure they have committed what we would call war crimes, as every army does in every war. Speaker 0: Right. Including our own. Speaker 1: Right? Of course. In every war, including the civil war. I forget who it was.
RedWave_Press
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A gunman on a moving boat opened fire into a crowd at the American Fish Company restaurant in South Port, North Carolina. Multiple victims were taken to the hospital, and as of 10:30 p.m., the suspect remains at large.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: A g*n man on a moving boat opened fire into a crowd of people at the American Fish Company restaurant in South Port, North Carolina, according to The North Carolina Beat. Multiple victims were rushed to the hospital, and the suspect has yet to be caught as of 10:30 p.m. Credit: @IntelPointAlert

RedWave_Press
Posted - September 21, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Saved - September 22, 2025 at 5:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the good news of Jesus Christ with 60,000 people at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, feeling the undeniable presence of God. It reminded me that attempts to extinguish the light only make it burn brighter, just as we've known for 2,000 years. Every single time.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Tucker Carlson proclaims the good news of Jesus Christ in front of 60,000 people at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, declaring, “This is the most unbelievable thing I think I’ve ever seen.” “God’s very obvious presence in this room. The presence of Jesus is a reminder of what we’ve known for 2,000 years, which is that any attempt to extinguish the light causes it to burn brighter.” “Every single time.” Well said!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes a gathering with God's presence, hoping for direction because God is here. He recalls Charlie Kirk as a Christian evangelist who loved groups and spoke truth about those in power, recalling Jerusalem and the impulse to silence truth, including 'Why don't we just kill him?' He notes 'Everything is inverted' and 'Blessed are those who mourn for they will be comforted.' Charlie's message brought the gospel to the country, calling for repentance; politics cannot be the final answer because the only real solution is Jesus. 'Politics at its core is a process of critiquing other people and getting them to change.' Christianity begins with repentance; 'forgive us our sins' precedes forgiving others. He was fearless, with no hate in his heart, and he said, 'That's a sad person, that's a broken person, that's a person who needs help, That's a person who needs Jesus.' This is the way.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the most unbelievable thing I think I've ever seen. And I don't what whatever happens next in America, I hope it's in this direction because God is here, and you can feel it. And Charlie would have loved this, not just because he loved large groups of people, but because ultimately he was a Christian evangelist. And it actually reminds me of my favorite story ever. So it's about two thousand years ago in Jerusalem and Jesus shows up and he starts talking about the people in power. And he starts doing the worst thing that you can do which is telling the truth about people and they hate it. And they just go bonkers. They hate it. And they become obsessed with making him stop. This guy's got to stop talking. We've got to shut this guy up. And I can just sort of picture the scene in a lamp lit room with a bunch of guys sitting around eating hummus thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth about us. We must make him stop talking. And there's always one guy with the bright idea and I can just hear him say, I've got an idea. Why don't we just kill him? That'll shut him up. That'll fix the problem. It doesn't work that way. It doesn't work that way. Everything is inverted and the beatitudes tell it, I think the most crisply. Everything is sort of the opposite of what you think it's gonna be. Blessed are those who mourn for they will be comforted. That is true and you can feel it here. The thing about Charlie's message, I've thought a lot about it and I'm trying not to be emotional because in addition to everything else, he was a wonderful man and a decent man and one of those rare people you meet who you just groove with in conversation and have these very intense conversations that you don't stop thinking about, which is my experience with But the main thing about Charlie and his message, he was bringing the gospel to the country. He was doing the thing that the people in charge hate most, which is calling for them to repent. So how is Charlie's message different? And Charlie was a political person who was deeply interested in coalition building and in getting the right people in office because he knew that vast improvements are possible politically. But he also knew that politics is not the final answer. It can't answer the deepest questions actually. That the only real solution is Jesus. And the reason, it's really simple. Politics at its core is a process of critiquing other people and getting them to change. Christianity, the gospel message, the message of Jesus begins with repentance. Christianity calls upon you to change. Our core prayer given to us by Jesus, the Lord's prayer, demands that we forgive other people. But preceding that is a request for our forgiveness. In other words, forgive us our sins, meditate on what we've done wrong, how we've fallen short, and then it becomes possible to forgive other people. That is a call to change our hearts from Jesus. And that is the only way forward in this country. That is the only solution to where we all know we're going. And Charlie knew where we were going without that. And that is not a call for being politically passive. Of course not. I stood at many stages with Charlie calling for various people to be elected, particularly Donald Trump. And I'm proud of that. It's only an acknowledgement that what Charlie was really saying is that change begins the only change that matters when we repent of our sins. We, me. A recognition that the real problem is me and how fallen I am. And that was the reason that Charlie was fearless at all times. Truly fearless to his last moment. He was unafraid. He was not defensive. And there was no hate in his heart. I know that because I've got a little hate compartment in my heart. And I would often express that to Charlie about various people. And he would always say, always say, that's a sad person, that's a broken person, that's a person who needs help, That's a person who needs Jesus. He said that in private. Because he meant it. So I guess I would just say this gathering and God's presence, God's very obvious presence in this room. The presence of Jesus is a reminder of what we've known for two thousand years. Which is any attempt to extinguish the light causes it to burn brighter. Every single time. So as we as we proceed into whatever comes next and clearly something's coming next. Remember this moment. Remember being in a room with the holy spirit humming like a tuning fork. This is the way. Right here. This is the way. And that is what Charlie Kirk was saying underneath it all. Thank you and God bless.
RedWave_Press
Posted - September 20, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Saved - September 21, 2025 at 7:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Department of Public Safety has identified Joshua Runkles, 42, as the man who impersonated a law enforcement officer and was armed at Charlie Kirk’s memorial event. He has been released on bond and faces charges for felony impersonation and a misdemeanor for carrying a weapon in a prohibited area. Investigations are ongoing to determine his intentions and background to assess if there were any sinister motives behind his actions.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

JUST IN: The Arizona Department of Public Safety has identified 42-year-old Joshua Runkles as the individual who impersonated a law enforcement officer and was armed at the site of Charlie Kirk’s memorial event on Sunday. He has since been released on bond. Runkles has been charged with felony impersonating a law enforcement officer and a misdemeanor carrying a weapon into a prohibited place. Bill Melugin: “They’re now investigating what his intentions were here. Looking into his background and trying to figure out if there were any sinister motives as to why he would show up onsite and pretend to be part of the security plan here.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Arizona Department of Public Safety confirms the man who showed up armed and pretending to be law enforcement has now been charged with felony impersonation of law enforcement as well as misdemeanor carrying a weapon into a prohibited space. Joshua Runkles has since been released on bond; investigators are examining motives and background, with a mugshot expected. "Glendale PD telling Fox News, they wouldn't be surprised if upwards of a 100,000 people show up to memorialize Charlie Kirk." The arena seats about 60,000, with overflow into the NHL Arena where the Arizona Coyotes play. Speakers include President Trump, Vice President Vance, Erica Kirk, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, and cabinet members including secretary of state Marco Rubio, HHS secretary RFK junior, defense secretary Pete Hegseth, DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Attendees from Utah, Colorado, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Florida are traveling.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, John, a little bit of security news for you off the top here. Just a short time ago, we got an update from the Arizona Department of Public Safety confirming that the man who showed up on-site here yesterday and was arrested, armed with a gun, and pretending to be law enforcement has now been charged with a felony. According to AZDPS, his name is Joshua Runkles, and he has now been charged with felony impersonation of law enforcement as well as misdemeanor carrying a weapon into a prohibited space. They're now investigating what his intentions were here, looking into his background, and trying to figure out if there were any sinister motives as to why he would show up on-site and pretend to be part of the security plan here when he very clearly wasn't. Joshua Runkles has since been released on bond. As we get more details, we'll update our viewers also working on getting his mugshot. In the meantime, in the meantime, excuse me, this is gonna be a huge ceremony tomorrow. Glendale PD telling Fox News, they wouldn't be surprised if upwards of a 100,000 people show up to memorialize Charlie Kirk. Now the the arena behind us where the Arizona Cardinals play only seats about 60,000. So, John, we're looking at potentially tens of thousand of people into overflow. That overflow, we're told, would go into the nearby NHL Arena where the Arizona coyotes play. And then you have some of the biggest names in Republican politics coming out here to speak on Charlie Kirk's behalf. That includes president Trump, vice president Vance, Erica Kirk, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, and then several of president Trump's cabinet members, including secretary of state Marco Rubio, HHS secretary RFK junior, defense secretary Pete Hegseth, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, and several other people. We also caught up with some folks who are coming from all around the country to, come to this ceremony tomorrow and honor Charlie Kirk. We talked to two guys from Utah and Colorado as to why they felt it was important to make the trip to Arizona. Take a listen. That's gonna be an amazing event. You know, one of America's greatest hero. As long as Charlie Kirk's name is on someone's lips, that's his legacy. And since we've been out here in Arizona, we have been talking to people from all over the country, literally, who are making the trip here to Arizona just to list some of the states we've talked to. You heard Colorado and Utah there. I talked to folks last night from Pennsylvania, South Carolina. We also talked to one person who made the drive all the way out from the state of Florida. We'll send it back to you, John. I am
RedWave_Press
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 6:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A radical leftist was forcibly removed for blocking the exit at the immigration processing facility in Broadview, Illinois. During the chaos, an agent lost a tear gas canister, which the protester threw at reporters. The protester was arrested shortly after.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

HAPPENING NOW: A radical leftist is forcibly removed after blocking the exit to the immigration processing facility in Broadview, Illinois. Amid the chaos, an agent loses a tear gas canister, which the protester picks up and hurls at nearby reporters. The protester was immediately arrested. Credit: @AliBradleyTV

RedWave_Press
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 1:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked to learn that Kellen McMiller, a man with outstanding warrants in four states, posed for a picture with Illinois Governor JB Pritzker while working as a "peacekeeper." Just days later, he was involved in a robbery that resulted in the death of an innocent man. The governor's office initially referred to McMiller and his group as "trusted messengers," but they quickly removed the photo after discovering his connection to the crime. McMiller now faces serious charges, including murder and burglary.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

SHOCKING: A man with outstanding warrants in four states worked as a “peacekeeper” and was able to take a one-on-one picture with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, according to CWB Chicago. Less than a week after the picture, the man, 35-year-old Kellen McMiller, was a part of a five-man crash-and-grab robbery crew that kiIIed an innocent man. (Video below) CWB Chicago: “In a press release issued later that day, the governor’s office called the group “‘trusted messengers’ in the community.”” “That press release also included a photo of McMiller posing with Pritzker, but it was quickly removed after officials learned that he was being charged in connection with Arceta’s death.” McMiller is charged with mu*der, burglary, and felony theft.

RedWave_Press
Posted - September 11, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw that the Wall Street Journal confirmed Steven Crowder's report about Charlie Kirk's killer's ammunition being engraved with trans and antifascist ideology. CNN is calling it "cultural issues" found on a rifle near the assassination site. We really need to rethink our feelings about the media!

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: The Wall Street Journal has CONFIRMED Steven Crowder’s reporting that Charlie Kirk’s k*ller’s ammunition was “engraved with tr*nsg*nder and antif*scist ideology.” Meanwhile, CNN reports this as “cultural issues” were found scrawled on a rifle and ammunition found in the woods near where Kirk was ass*ssinated. We don’t HATE the media enough!

Video Transcript AI Summary
"This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting." "It is a high powered bolt action rifle." "That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled." "So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon." "Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis." "Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive." "I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated." "As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting. It is a high powered bolt action rifle. That rifle was was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled. So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon. Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis. Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive. I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated. As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that.
RedWave_Press
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Saved - August 16, 2025 at 2:52 AM

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

WATCH — A visibly AGGRAVATED Jake Tapper is caught on a hot mic telling CNN producers, “I’m fine, just give me my show back.” Anderson Cooper: “Your show’s back.” https://t.co/L0AYShGk6i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Back to Jake in Anchorage, where Jake says, "I'm fine. Just give me my show back. Show's back." The host then declares the show is back and moves on to introduce Senator Schiff, noting that Schiff is joining the program and is ready to go as the Democratic senator.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's go back to Jake in Anchorage. Jake? I I I I'm fine. Just give me my show back. Show's back. Alright. Here we go. So let's go now to senator Schiff, who I we have here. Senator Schiff is joining me, ready to go in senator for Democratic senator from
RedWave_Press
Posted - July 28, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Saved - July 29, 2025 at 1:59 AM

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING — CNN is reporting the Manhattan sh00ter is “white” despite images showing he is clearly not white. “They do know what he looks like. Sunglasses, mustache, male, possibly white.” https://t.co/JP5soVVAbm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI is investigating a 44-story building. They have a description of the suspect: male, possibly white, with sunglasses and a mustache. Authorities have identified potential locations of the suspect within the building based on 911 calls and elevator video. They are focused on the upper floors. The suspect's current status is unknown, but law enforcement has moved "incredibly quickly" to investigate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brian, stay with us. The deputy former deputy director of the FBI, Andy McCabe, is with us as well. And Andy, I just want to ask you. You talk about a 40 floor, a 44 story building as Brian is reporting and what John Miller just said. There were a few things that really stood out there among them that they did get. They do know what he looks like sunglasses, mustache, male, possibly white and that they were already able to identify various parts of the building where they think he is right now from 09:11 calls and also possibly video on those elevators that they were able to move that quickly. And and John said they're focused on various floors in the upper parts of the building. That that now now we don't. We don't know his status right now if that's gonna end up being where he is, but they have moved incredibly quickly.
RedWave_Press
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Saved - June 25, 2025 at 12:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FBI is investigating me, Cynthia Gonzalez, the Vice Mayor of Cudahy, after I posted a video on social media urging gang members from 18th Street and Florencia 13 to protect their territory from ICE. I told them to "get your members in order" as I expressed my frustration over the situation. Following the video, which I later deleted, the FBI visited my home, and I acknowledged the need for legal representation. While the FBI has not confirmed the investigation, they condemned any calls for gang violence. I'm awaiting responses from the city and media inquiries.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

JUST IN: The FBI is investigating the Vice Mayor of Cudahy, California, Cynthia Gonzalez, after she posted a video on social media calling on the 18th Street and Florencia 13 gang members to protect their “turf” against ICE, according to Fox News. Gonzalez even told the gang leadership to “just f*cking get your members in order.” “Now that your hood is being invaded by the biggest gang there is. There ain’t a peep out of you.” LOCK HER UP!

Video Transcript AI Summary
A California vice mayor, Cynthia Gonzalez of Cudahy in Los Angeles County, is reportedly under federal investigation for allegedly calling on gangs to defend their territory against ICE agents. According to Fox News sources, Gonzalez purportedly posted a video last week in which she stated that gangs tag their territory but are silent while their "hood's being invaded by the biggest gang there is." She contrasted this with others "not about the gang life" who are "fighting our turf, protecting our turf, protecting our people." Fox News reached out to Gonzalez to verify the video but has not received a response.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a vice mayor in California accused of calling on gangs to defend their territory against ICE agents. Sources tell Fox, Cynthia Gonzalez Cudahy in Los Angeles County is under federal investigation for allegedly posting this video last week. Watch. You just tag everything up, claiming hood. And now that your hood's being invaded by the biggest gang there is, they're in a peep out of you. It's everyone else who's not about the gang life that's out there protesting and speaking up. We're out there, like, fighting our turf, protecting our turf, protecting our people. And, like, where you at? We reached out to Gonzalez to see if to verify this video, and we have not heard back, but we'll let you know.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Credit: She is under active federal investigation, and the FBI paid her a visit at her house.

@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin

EXCLUSIVE: Per federal sources, the vice mayor of Cudahy, a city in southeast LA County, is under FBI investigation after she allegedly posted a video to social media in which she appears to call for 18th Street & Florencia 13 gang members in LA to defend their territory from ICE, even urging gang leadership to “get your fucking members in order”. I’m told Cynthia Gonzalez posted the video late last week, then deleted it, and that the FBI later visited her home & she is under active federal investigation. Gonzalez posted on her social media that the FBI came to her house, and she needs a lawyer. FBI LA tells FOX they cannot confirm or deny an investigation, but that they condemn any call for gang violence. We’ve reached out to Gonzalez via phone and email & are awaiting a response. No response yet from the city of Cudahy either. Will update as we get more.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the absence of gang leadership from Eighteenth Street and Florentia in Los Angeles, alleging their territory is being invaded by a larger gang. They claim these gangs are usually focused on claiming territory with tagging, but are now silent. The speaker contrasts this silence with the actions of ordinary people, who are protesting and organizing to protect their community. They criticize the gangs for not defending their claimed blocks and warn them against trying to reclaim territory after the larger gang leaves, arguing they forfeited their right by not helping. The speaker urges gang leaders to mobilize their members.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not for nothing, but I wanna know where all the cholas are at in Los Angeles. Eighteenth Street, Florentia. Where where's the leadership at? Because you guys are all about territory, and this is Eighteenth Street, and this is Florentia. You guys tag everything up, claiming hood. And now that your hood's being invaded by the biggest gang there is, they're in a peep out of you. It's everyone else who's not about the gang life that's out there protesting and speaking up. We're out there, like, biting our turf, protecting our turf, protecting our people. And, like, where you at? I'm like, dude, they're running a muck all up in your on your streets on your streets and in your city and peep. When the big gang guns come in, nothing but, like, quiet, and we're out here, the regular ones that have never been jumped in, out here calling things out, trying to organize people, trying to do the thing. So don't be trying to claim no block, no nothing if you're not showing up right now trying to, like, help out and organize. I don't wanna hear a peep out of you once they're gone trying to claim that this is my block. This was not your block. You weren't even here helping out. So whoever's the leadership over there, just fucking get your members in order.
RedWave_Press
Posted - June 22, 2025 at 1:14 AM
Saved - June 22, 2025 at 1:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just heard from Sean Hannity that President Trump announced the deployment of six 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility. Additionally, two other Iranian sites, Natanz and Esfahan, were destroyed using 30 Tomahawk missiles launched from submarines.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: Fox News host Sean Hannity just spoke with President Trump, who revealed six 30,000-pound bunker buster b*mbs were dropped from B-2 stealth b*mbers onto the Fordow nuclear facility. Two other Iranian nuclear facilities, Natanz and Esfahan, were wiped out with 30 Tomahawk missiles launched from American submarines from 400 miles away. HUGE!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran's nuclear ambitions are officially dead after the United States obliterated Iran's top secret Fordo nuclear facility with five to six bunker buster bombs dropped from America's stealth B2 bombers. Two other major Iranian nuclear sites, Natanz and Estevan, were wiped out with 30 Tomahawk missiles launched by American submarines some 400 miles away. Everyone is out of harm's way for now, but American assets in the region are still at risk, and the Iranian response is being monitored.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And welcome to Hannity. We begin tonight with this Fox News alert. I just spoke to the president of The United States. I have some new information and breaking details to share about tonight's what is historic air campaign. Now tonight, Iran's nuclear ambitions, they are officially dead. It appears The United States just completely obliterated Iran's top secret Fordo nuclear facility with six huge bunker buster bombs. It was originally speculated that you would only need two. It turns out they use five to six dropped from America's stealth b two bombers, and that's not all. Two other major Iranian nuclear sites, Natanz and Estevan, were wiped out with 30 Tomahawk missiles launched by American submarines some 400 miles away. Everyone is out of harm's way for now. That does not mean that American assets in the region are not at risk, and we are monitoring, the Iranian response or potential response all throughout the night. We
RedWave_Press
Posted - June 14, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 3:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were tragically killed in a politically motivated assassination. Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also shot but are expected to survive. A manhunt is ongoing for the suspect, who was posing as a police officer.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announces Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman (D) and her husband were k*lled after being sh*t in a “politically motivated ass*ssanation.” Minnesota Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also sh*t by the same mad man but Gov. Tim Walz is "cautiously optimistic" they will survive.  A manhunt is underway for the suspect who was impersonating a police officer when he carried out the atrocity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed in Minnesota early this morning in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination. Hortman is described as a great leader, a formidable public servant, and a giant in Minnesota. She served the people of Minnesota with grace, compassion, humor, and a sense of service. She woke up every day determined to make the state a better place. She is irreplaceable and will be missed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here today because an unspeakable tragedy has unfolded in Minnesota. My good friend and colleague, speaker Melissa and her husband Mark, were shot and killed early this morning in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination. Our state lost a great leader, and I lost a dearest of friends. Speaker Hortman was someone who served the people of Minnesota with grace, compassion, humor, and a sense of service. She was formidable public servant, a fixture and a giant in Minnesota. She woke up every day determined to make this state a better place. She is irreplaceable, and we've been missed by so many.
RedWave_Press
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 8:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that Elon Musk took a shot at President Trump by quote-tweeting a 2013 post where Trump expressed embarrassment over Republicans extending the debt ceiling. Musk commented, “Wise words.” In response, Trump shared his thoughts on Truth Social, arguing that the debt limit should be completely eliminated to avoid an economic disaster, emphasizing the potential devastating effects of political manipulation on the economy and the world. The discussion included a video of Trump addressing the debt ceiling issue.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

JUST IN: Elon Musk takes a jab at President Trump by quote-tweeting an 𝕏 post from 2013 when Trump said, “I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!” Musk quoted the 𝕏 post today stating: “Wise words[.]” Trump said Wednesday on Truth Social: “The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe. It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World.“ The video is Trump discussing the debt ceiling.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A certain senator, Elizabeth Warren, wanted to get rid of the debt ceiling, which the speaker calls the debt extension. Many Democrats agree with this. The speaker says that Democrats gave them the debt ceiling issue just before the election, which would have had a huge impact on the election. Elizabeth Warren wanted to see the debt ceiling terminated her whole career because it's so catastrophic for the country, and the speaker always agreed with her on that. The speaker hasn't spoken to her, but thinks if asked now, she'd say no because it's their problem. The speaker believes the debt ceiling should be gotten rid of or simply extended. The current bill automatically extends it for a four-year period, which it should. The speaker agrees with Elizabeth Warren that it should be gotten rid of because it's too catastrophic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you, a certain senator, Elizabeth Warren, said that she would never ever, allow a default on our debt. She would never let let it happen, and she would like to get rid of the debt ceiling, what's called the debt ceiling. I call it the debt extension because we really need an extension that she'd like to see that gotten rid of. And there are many people that agree. Many Democrats agree with that, but we gave that through and, you know, I don't wanna say an error. He he did it well, meaning they gave that to us. It was a Democrat problem just before the election. Woulda had a huge impact on the election. And to our benefit, we won anyway, but to our benefit. But felt that really for the good of the country, we should extend that. But Elizabeth Warren and various other people would like to see that her whole career, she wanted to see it terminated, gotten rid of, not being voted on every five years or ten years. And the reason was because it's so catastrophic for our country. And I always agreed with her. That was one thing I agreed with her on. Now, I haven't spoken to her, but, I would say that if you asked her that question now, she'd say, no. No. It's their problem. But it's a very unfortunate situation. It's a very unfair situation. And she happened to be right on that. It should be gotten rid of or it should simply be extended. But that's one of the things that gets taken care of in this bill. That automatically gets extended for a four year period, and it should be. But I agree with Elizabeth Warren on that. I think you should get rid of it. It's too catastrophic.
RedWave_Press
Posted - May 9, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Saved - May 10, 2025 at 6:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a heated exchange with Fox News host Martha MacCallum regarding the Newark Mayor and three Democratic Congress members who stormed a detention facility. MacCallum questioned whether they were assaulted, to which I laughed and pointed out they looked fine. I emphasized that their actions were merely grandstanding and that breaking the law has consequences that can't be mitigated by such theatrics.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

New Jersey U.S. Attorney Alina Habba SMACKS Fox News host Martha MacCallum after she tries painting the Newark Mayor and three Democratic members of Congress as the victims after they stormed a New Jersey detention facility housing dangerous illegal immigrants. MacCallum: “They were not assaulted, these three individuals?” Habba: *Laughs* “Does it look like they were assaulted, Martha?” MacCallum: “No, they looked fine.” “I’m trying to figure out exactly what they’re trying to do to protect the people in New Jersey.” Habba: “It’s called grandstanding… When you break the law, there is no grandstanding that will help you. Period, the end.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker clarifies the mayor's arrest, stating the mayor was inside the facility, warned repeatedly to leave, and arrested after refusing. The arrest occurred inside, and he was cuffed after walking out. The speaker defends the HSI team, asserting they acted correctly. The speaker alleges some individuals had publicly stated intentions to enter the facility. The speaker claims the mayor broke the law and "grandstanding" won't help. The speaker confirms that the three individuals were not assaulted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The mayor was outside the fence and that he was taken away by 20 armed individuals and that they were all intimidated by federal officials on this property. What do you say? Speaker 1: I'm gonna say the truth and correct them. I'm sorry that you're trying to politic this. Let me be very clear. You're right. Congress people have the right to investigate, and we allowed them in, number one. Number two, the mayor was actually inside the facility, was warned, was asked to leave several times, more than once, refused to leave, was put under arrest inside the facility, walked out when he was told he was under arrest and then was cuffed. That is what happened. Lucky for our team in HSI who I stand behind, who many people don't understand, the Department of Justice encompasses that, they did absolutely everything correct. If you look at these individuals Twitter accounts, they have been openly saying they're going to go in. There is a reason these congress people are standing out there running amok and running their mouths as usual. But however, I will tell you this, the mayor was inside, was told he was going to be under arrest inside when he refused to leave after several obligations, several notifications that he should remove himself, chose not to do so, and then was placed under arrest when he walked out of the facility. So while I love the scheme, the game and the tactics of these individuals that are perfectly fine and were not touched, I will say very clearly the mayor Speaker 0: They were not assaulted these three individuals. Speaker 1: None of Speaker 0: them were assaulted. Speaker 1: Is that what they thought they were assaulted, Martha? Speaker 0: No, they looked fine. But I'm asking, you know, in terms of what happened in there, you know, it is very striking, especially after having read the list of at least some of the people who are in this facility. And I'm trying to figure out exactly what they are doing to protect Speaker 1: the people in It's called grandstanding, unfortunately, Martha. And when you break the law, there's no grandstanding that will help you, period, the end.
RedWave_Press
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 1:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some shocking findings from our DOGE team’s investigations. We uncovered misuse of funds, like a $4B COVID relief fund used for lavish parties and loans given to deceased individuals. We also found that taxpayer money supports questionable projects, such as alpaca farming in Peru, while only a fraction reaches the intended recipients. Additionally, federal retirement processes are absurdly inefficient, taking six months to complete. Our team, including members who sacrificed their education for this mission, is dedicated to rooting out fraud and waste in government spending.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

A DOGE member reveals the Department of Education had a $4B C*VID fund, and people were taking that money and using it to rent out Caesars Palace and stadiums for parties. “And so the one change that DOGE made… was we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money, you must first upload a receipt.” “And upon [enacting this policy], nobody drew down any money anymore.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Treasury pays out $5 trillion per year, and previously, payments lacked budget codes, obscuring their purpose. A $4 billion COVID fund in the Department of Education had no receipt requirements, leading to funds being used to rent Caesars Palace and stadiums for parties. When a receipt upload requirement was implemented, fund drawdowns ceased, even though the receipts were not verified. Fraud often starts small and hidden, but escalates over time if unchecked, eventually becoming brazen, such as renting out stadiums.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So actually, lot of great work at the treasury this week. One of the crazy things at with regards to the treasury is that when a payment is made and the computers of the treasury actually pay about $5,000,000,000,000 per year like crazy amounts, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if some payment was made you didn't know actually what it was for. It could have been for anything. Yeah. There was a a $4,000,000,000 COVID fund in the Department of Education and there was no receipts required so people could just draw down on it. And when people looked into it, this wasn't just before us. They found that money was being used to rent out Caesars Palace for parties, rent out stadiums, etcetera. And so the one change that Doge made with Pharm Education is we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money, you must first upload a receipt. That was the only change that was made. You must upload your receipt and upon doing so, nobody drew down any money anymore. Speaker 1: Yes. But we we didn't say that we'd check the receipt. You could send a fake receipt. You could send a picture of your dog. Anything. Anything. Anything. And and they but as soon as we asked for anything at all, they were suddenly the requests were like, oh, we don't need it anymore. That's interesting. They were renting Caesar's Palace? Yes. They were like basically partying on the tax share of money. Stadiums? Yes. Leasing stadiums. Leasing stadiums. For what? For parties, basically. Speaker 0: For parties? Speaker 1: Yes. That's a big party. It's a big party. You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do start small. But then over what happens is over the years so generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen. And and every year it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in I think a million dollars to rent out a stadium? Fraud infra infragrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Our tax dollars went to a former Taliban member and private jet flights for employees at the “Institute of Peace.”

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

DOGE super geniuses discovered the “Institute of Peace” had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban “for generic services,” and the head accountant attempted to delete the evidence before DOGE arrived at their headquarters. “Just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several years.” “The DOGE team was unfortunately able to recover that data with the help of a few great people at the Institute of Peace.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers investigated the Institute of Peace and found it to be the least peaceful agency they'd worked with. The agency spent money on private jets and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for generic services with no clear description. Since the country's founding, the number of agencies has increased 100x. The team found weapons in the Institute's armory and evidence of payments to the Taliban. Shortly after the investigation began, the chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, which the team recovered. The Institute received $55 million a year from Congress, and unspent money was swept into a private bank account without congressional oversight, which funded events and private jets. The speakers allege the agencies are hiding money and sending it to the Taliban, and that the Institute of Peace was attempting a cover-up by deleting financial information. The evidence in the accounting example was referred to the FBI and DOJ.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with Yeah. Ironically. Speaker 1: Of Speaker 0: course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. Get out of is real. We don't encounter that in most agencies. Speaker 2: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for? Speaker 0: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. But was it for opium? Speaker 2: Unclear. Or weapons? Or nothing. Or nothing. Or abroad. Or yeah, nothing. Speaker 0: And you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100 x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation. And thanks to president Trump, he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government, and the institute of Peace was one of them, which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on. And that's when we found all of the craziness, like the weapons in their armory. We found the payments to the Taliban. Speaker 2: Okay. The the the council too. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. So just try to hide the evidence. Speaker 0: Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several years. So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team fortunately was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace. And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress, and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account, which had no congressional oversight. And that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and the private jets. And so I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies, and this is, I think, the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding. Speaker 2: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings. Speaker 0: At the Institute of Peace. Speaker 2: At the Institute of Peace. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's Speaker 2: right. So this is a cover up when you guys roll in? Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up. Yes. It's a cover ring. No. They did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up. Speaker 2: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Shred documents? It is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that they that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers. When you catch them going Hillary style on their computers, do you refer this to the Department of Justice? Speaker 0: In this case, we did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did. Speaker 2: Resistance has Speaker 0: shown

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Full interview:

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

FULL INTERVIEW: Jesse Watters interviews the DOGE team, including Elon Musk, as they reveal some shocking discoveries. https://t.co/6M6B9M9Sc9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge was invited to Elon Musk's weekly Doge meeting at the Eisenhower Building. The Treasury was found to make $5 trillion in payments annually without budget codes, and a $4 billion COVID fund in the Department of Education had no receipt requirements, leading to funds being used for parties at Caesar's Palace and stadium rentals. The Small Business Administration gave $330 million in loans to dead people and $660 million to babies. The Inter American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its congressional money on grantees, such as alpaca farmers in Peru, with the rest going to management and travel. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of stealing. The United States Institute of Peace was found to have loaded guns and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for generic services. The chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, and unspent funds were swept into a private bank account. The government uses paper retirement case folders that are compiled by hand and moved around on carts through a mine. The postal service is breaking the law by operating with a deficit since 2007, losing $9.5 billion last year. Protests have occurred, and death threats have been made against Doge team members. Government employees are helping reduce waste and fraud.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those have looked into Doge. Elon Musk was nice enough to invite us into the Eisenhower Building last night to sit in on his weekly 10PM Doge meeting. Yeah, they usually meet at 10:00. I'm almost in bed by then. We met the whole crew, even big balls, and they showed us how Doge really gets done. We sat back, listened, and we learned a lot, and we hope you do too. Here's part one of our exclusive interview. Elon, thank you so much for bringing us to the meeting here. I'm gonna do something no anchor ever does. I'm not gonna Speaker 1: talk. What? Speaker 0: As Speaker 1: long as I'm gonna You're talking right now. Speaker 0: I'm gonna let you run your and then I'll interrupt when I'm bored. Speaker 1: So take it away. So like a board meeting. Like a board Speaker 2: meeting. Exactly. Speaker 1: All right. Well, I guess we normally go around the table, say what what do we get done this week? Oh, this way? Sure. No. We start with you. Sure. Speaker 3: So actually, lot of great work at the Treasury this week. One of the crazy things at with regards to the treasury is that when a payment is made and the computers at the treasury actually pay about $5,000,000,000,000 per year, like crazy amounts, There was formerly not a budget code on there. So if some of the payment was made, you didn't know actually what it was for. It could have been for anything. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 3: There was a $4,000,000,000 COVID fund in the Department of Education and there was no receipts required. So people would just draw down on it. When people looked into it, this wasn't just before us. They found that money was being used to rent out Caesars Palace for parties, rent out stadiums, etcetera. And so the one change that Doge made with Pharm Education is we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money, you must first upload a receipt. That was the only change that was made. You must upload your receipt and upon doing so, drew down any money anymore. Speaker 1: Yes. But we we didn't we didn't say that we'd check the receipt. You could send a fake receipt. You could send a picture of your dog. Anything. Anything. Anything. And and they but as soon as we asked for anything at all, they suddenly the requests were like, oh, we don't need it anymore. That's interesting. Speaker 0: They were renting Caesar's Palace? Speaker 1: Yes. They were, like, basically partying on the tax share of money. Stadiums? Yes. Leasing stadiums. Leasing stadiums. For what? For parties, basically. Speaker 0: For parties? Yes. That's a big party. Speaker 1: It's a big party. Speaker 0: You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do Speaker 1: start small. But then over what happens is over the years so generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen. And and every year it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in Speaker 0: I mean, What's the million dollars to rent out a stadium? Speaker 1: Fraud infra infragrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale. Speaker 0: This is driving me crazy. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: When you find these things, do you guys get mad? You're like, yes. I got one. How does it how does it make you feel? Speaker 4: It's so common. Speaker 1: Common. You know, like, he's doing it. I mean, you just get numb to it. Like, unfortunately, you get like, the the like, the hundredth time you've heard it, you it's hard not to get a little numb. Yeah. You know? But, like and by the two hundredth time, you're like, well, okay. It's just another day at the office. Speaker 5: We checked, is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? The answer was yes, and it was around 330,000,000 in total. Speaker 1: So people with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So the safe to say if anybody is in the in the system as a hundred and 15 years or older, that is fake. Speaker 6: So just by sharing a database and looking at social security numbers that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over 115 years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Babies and dead people 11 years old. Speaker 2: That's pretty clear. Speaker 1: Babies and dead people who were getting loans. Speaker 6: That was $660,000,000. Speaker 1: Yeah. And also people with birth dates in the future. What does that mean? Well, in one case, I mean, I think the, like the birth date, the birth date, I think in one case was like Fetuses were getting No, not even. No, really sort of like, you're talking about like your great grandchildren. Like, with the birth date, like, think it was like 02/1965. So more than a century from now was the birth date. Speaker 0: George Jetson was getting paid. Speaker 1: Yes. Because your birthday is in the future. Like the far, like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong. It's either a typo Speaker 0: or someone stealing. Speaker 1: Which isn't? Yes. Right. Yes. You you should at least ask which isn't. Do you Speaker 0: guys feel you're getting justice and accountability? Speaker 2: One of the, I think extreme examples of non, accountability in some cases is has occurred at some of the small agencies. I think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where, you know, they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like, you know, alpaca farming in Peru, improving them Speaker 1: That's not that's a real example. Speaker 2: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Fruit jam. And what? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 4: Yeah. So you might Speaker 2: expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes towards management, travel. Speaker 1: What what we're trying exactly, Domingue, as an example is is that even if you agreed with up with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, Well, actually most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in in the neighborhood. Speaker 0: What percentage And then get to Peru. Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to? Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates, this is not our estimate. I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢ and the dollar actually gets to the end recipient. Whether you agree with that cause or not. Speaker 0: So they're just stealing the money before it even gets anywhere. Speaker 1: There's layers of stealing. So there's like, there's the first layer of stealing, second layer of stealing, third layer of stealing. Subcontractor, subcontractor. Yeah. Exactly. Contractor, subcontractor, subcontractor. It's like peeling an onion. And then maybe and sometimes it's zero. Just flat you you get to the bottom of the onion. There's nothing there. Speaker 0: So maybe no one got a sex change in Guatemala. Speaker 1: It's possible that no one got a sex change in Guatemala. Speaker 4: I overheard a contractor tell one of her colleagues to falsify billable hours by creating a PowerPoint to mask a delay in the onboarding process in front of me. And this is like hour zero at this agency. And so, I mean, this is just a common theme that you take a look at these contracts, you take a look at these grants, and it's veiled in noble rhetoric. You know, it's at the top level. It's like Speaker 1: It sounds good. Speaker 4: Yeah. It sounds amazing. And then you actually just follow what is the what are the funds actually doing? Speaker 1: Or send us a picture. Speaker 4: Exactly. And Speaker 1: The the send us a picture request is incredibly good. Like, Pixar didn't happen. And then, like and then, like and and it wouldn't be that hard to just frankly, they could search for for some fake pics on the Internet or get AI to generate the pics, but they don't even bother doing that. Speaker 0: So you you caught them cold billing fraud? Speaker 4: Oh, I caught them her advising her colleague to do this because it takes a few days to onboard. So that is being investigated right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, generally, like, like these programs, these grants are gonna be like along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And, you know, in some cases they've got a show panda, which they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, they don't even have a show panda. No panda. There's not even one panda. Because we asked for pictures and we don't even get one panda. And he's like, well, you gotta well, that's a lot of, you know, what's the what's what does a billion dollars get you? Does not even get you one panda? Speaker 0: You really wanna see a baby panda? Speaker 1: Yeah. That will you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with like, we shouldn't have Ebola. You know? Where is the money going? Oh, it's going to Deloitte in DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money? Speaker 0: What has been the biggest resistance? Is there one agency? Is there one department that when you guys walk in, they all start fighting you, start hiding Speaker 1: I thought you weren't gonna talk. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Speaker 1: But I guess you could answer that question. Sure. I mean, let's yes, we've certainly had some battles. Battles? Yeah. Yeah. I mean Yeah. Speaker 2: The the Speaker 1: Who who should talk about you, sir? Speaker 2: Oh, Nate. Yeah. Okay. Speaker 7: Yeah. So, Jesse, there's there's Nate. The small agency called the United States Institute of Peace is definitely the agency we had the most fight at. We actually went into the agency and found they had loaded guns inside of their headquarters. Institute for Peace. Speaker 1: I mean, given company any given organizational name is gonna be kinda be the opposite of the title. Right. Yeah. Speaker 7: Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with. Yeah. Ironically. Speaker 1: Of Speaker 7: course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a 130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. This is this is real. We don't encounter that in most agencies. Speaker 0: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for? Speaker 7: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. Speaker 0: But was it for opium? Speaker 2: Unclear. Or weapons? Or nothing. Or nothing. Or abroad. Speaker 7: Or yeah, nothing. And you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100 x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation. And thanks to president Trump, he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government, and the institute of peace was one of them, which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on. And that's when we found all of the craziness, like the weapons in their armory. We found the payments to the Taliban. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Do you Speaker 1: to counsel too. Oh, yeah. So just try to hide the evidence. Speaker 7: Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several years. So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team fortunately was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace. And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress, and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account, which had no congressional oversight and that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and the private jets. And so I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies and this is, I think the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding. Speaker 0: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings. Speaker 7: At the Institute of Peace. Speaker 0: At the Institute of Peace. Yes. Speaker 7: That's right. Speaker 0: So this is a cover up when you guys roll in? Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up. It's a cover up. They did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up. Speaker 0: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence? Yes. Shred documents? Speaker 7: It is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that the that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers. Speaker 0: When you catch them going Hillary style on their computers, Do you refer this to the Department of Justice? Speaker 7: In this case, did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did. Speaker 8: Resistance has shown up in some very surprising places. So for example, the famous fork in the road email, the deferred resignation program. So this was a program where you could resign from the government, collect pay and benefits for the next eight months. Probably the most attractive separation program ever in human history. And the resistance actually came from the outside with people saying this is a trick, and I've heard somebody refer to it as an apple with a razor blade. And, no, this was just a really juicy apple, caramel dipped apple. It it it was that good, but people were talked out of out of taking it. And now what started to happen is Speaker 7: we did have Speaker 8: about 80,000 people take it, and now those folks who did take it are on the beach or they've moved on to a new job and they're still getting paid. And so now we're starting to offer fork two and fork three where people can see that someone's eaten this apple and it was actually really tasty and good for them. Speaker 0: Is Doge just getting started? Is this is a long term enterprise. Speaker 1: It's a long term enterprise because if if we take our eye off the ball, the waste and fraud will come roaring back. Speaker 0: They can doge doge when democrats get back in power? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think some of the things that like, we're to have it be such that the funding is is removed, so the grants are gone. So this it that if there's a lot of work required to restart the waste of fraud. And and that that will at least slow it down. Speaker 0: Elon Musk shows primetime the cave, the money faucet, and the stone age phones. Right back. We're back, part two. The exclusive interview with Elon Musk and the Doge Boys. They took us inside the caves of bureaucracy. Watch this. We heard about a cave. We had federal workers working in a cave. Speaker 1: That's me. They still Joe's actually been to the cave. Do do you wanna tell tell us about your your cave your cave your cave is? Speaker 0: I wouldn't Speaker 1: I wouldn't mind you. Spelunking? You're you're spelunking. Speaker 9: So I've been helping out with retirement. Been helping out with retirement and a few weeks ago I had chance to go to the mine. And so I took a golf cart through security down into the side of a mountain and entered daylight left and I entered this whole space of caverns and roads and we get to a metal door and I open it up and there in front of me is is a sea of filing cabinets from the nineteen sixties. And I'm walking around, it's super chilly, smells like paper. And you know, I realized for for as a mind, it's it's a great mind. It's secure, it's well lit, temperature controlled. And so the question we're not ask we're asking is not is this a good place to store physical media, which it is. It's amazing for that. The question is, why are we still using paper in 2025? So I brought something to show you Speaker 8: Yeah. Of what's inside the mind. Speaker 1: And and only the the normal process for retirement is over it'll be over six months. So once you file your retirement papers, that's why it takes six months. Speaker 0: Mhmm. What what is that? Speaker 9: So these are replica case folders that people use to retire from the government. And so these are all compiled by hand and moved around on carts through the mind. It takes many months to do that, and this one is a single retiree's paper required to leave the government. Speaker 1: So if somebody wants to retire, they can't because it takes six months to compile the paper and carry the paper into a mine where it is stored. And and also, all the calculations are done by hand. Everything has to done Speaker 4: by five. Speaker 9: Reconciled, adjudicated, this is thicker than the Word of the Rings trilogy. Speaker 0: Yeah. And Speaker 6: if I had to process this, Speaker 9: I would rather do my taxes in the dark than have to go through Speaker 7: this. Yeah. Speaker 9: And so what we're doing is we're we're bringing this process online with modern software. And I'm excited to share that as of tonight, have 25 retirees going through an entirely online retirement process in the government for the very first time. Speaker 0: It sounds so simple. Yes. Speaker 9: And and it's great collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. So this has always been their dream, we're just here to help accelerate it. Speaker 0: That's a pretty fat stack. Was that Kissinger's? Speaker 1: Oh, no. This the record is almost I mean, several shopping carts. Speaker 0: For Speaker 9: there's a whole pallet for one retiree with 27 boxes of paper on Speaker 0: it. For one guy. Speaker 1: That's the record. Speaker 9: I've seen it with my own eyes. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, it's certainly and and and it also frees up people because we we shouldn't have over a thousand people carrying paper into a mine. That that is not a good use of human of people's lives. So there are many other things that they could do that would be far more productive than carrying paper into a mic. Speaker 0: If you were to say, we have iPhones, does the government have payphones? Like, prehistoric is this technology? Speaker 1: Oh, yes. It's it's Speaker 2: it's very prehistoric. Sorry. Speaker 0: It's very prehistoric. Speaker 1: It's like Flintstones. Speaker 0: It's Flintstone level stuff. Speaker 1: It's it's so prehistoric. Like dinosaurs would think this is, you know, kinda old. Okay. That's how prehistoric it is. Okay. So we're I mean, basically, the only thing loving was a sponge when That's how prehistoric it was. Speaker 0: Okay. So we're leaving the stone age, and we're moving into the Golden Age. Speaker 1: The Precambrian era is what we're Speaker 0: talking about. Okay. There was a story I heard about mules. There were mules delivering mail to the bottom of the Grand Canyon. Speaker 1: Which might not might not be a bad thing, actually. You have the mule picture. Speaker 0: Pics or it doesn't exist. Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. Yeah. But this and this this is a case where actually it might not I think do we agree with the mule or or should should there be rules? Speaker 10: I think it can be modernized. Speaker 1: If there's opportunity for improvement. Yes. Right. Okay. Speaker 10: Right. So, yeah, I'm at the postal service. Speaker 0: I I think a lot Speaker 10: of people don't realize that there's actually a law says that the post office is supposed to, like, have a balanced budget. Speaker 1: There is? Speaker 10: Yeah. There Speaker 1: is. I didn't know that. Yeah. Right. Well, that's not working, is it? No. It's not. So So they're breaking the law? Speaker 10: They're breaking the law. Okay. Basically, since 02/2007, almost every year since 02/2007, they've they've lost money. So you might ask, like, what happened in 02/2007? Speaker 1: So there was there was What happened 02/2007? Speaker 10: Yeah. There was additional regulation Okay. That went into place that essentially crippled them and put them down this, like, not good path where they essentially are stuck in the past as well as bleeding money left and right. Okay. So, like, it's great, and and we appreciate that the postal employees are are willing to go to the hardest parts, like, in this country, but we think that we can we can modernize it and and help them become profitable. Right now, last year, they lost 9 and a half billion dollars. Speaker 1: Wow. Yeah. Serious money. Speaker 0: We finally meet big balls. Up next. Part three. Here's the interview with Elon Musk and the rest of the Doge crew. We finally ask the one question on our mind. Who's Big Balls? It's me. Speaker 1: That should be obvious. Speaker 0: Why do they call you Big Pauls? Speaker 5: I just said it as my LinkedIn username. Okay. Well, people on LinkedIn take themselves, like, super seriously, and they're pretty adverse to risk. And I was like, well, I wanna be neither of those things. So I just I said it, and, honestly, I didn't even think anyone would notice. Speaker 1: Yeah. When you so cringe. Speaker 0: What does Big Balls do? Speaker 5: Right now, I'm working on some payment computer stuff. So one of our initiatives is to root out fraud and waste. And to do that, we started looking at the payment computers. And as mentioned earlier, like, there is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. So, like, you look at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, and you're like, okay. Well, what is this money going to? And for the majority of payment systems, it's like, well, we don't really know. Speaker 1: And Yeah. They're like, what? That would be the response. Speaker 0: Is this the most basic responses? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That's the most common response. Speaker 0: What do you say when people just say, I don't know. Speaker 5: Well, it's a huge cause for concern because, like, the upstream thing, which is distributing the money, literally has no checks and no no accountability to the actual American taxpayer. So it's a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse. Speaker 0: Do these people not respect taxpayer money? Speaker 5: I mean, there's no incentive to you if you work in the government. I think the incentives will always decide the outcomes. Speaker 0: Yes. Do you guys feel like you're putting yourself at risk by doing this because you're stirring up so much hostility by these people ripping us off? Speaker 1: A %. Well, we don't need to speculate about that. You can see online in in the protests that they make that very clear. I mean, I've been hanged in effigy many times, and there have been people that have actively advocated at these violent protests violent protests for my death and have also advocated for the death of the the people at Doge. Speaker 2: I think the young folks of us have gotten email threats from reporters and the public alike. I think speaking for myself I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country and it's been unfortunate to see you know lost friendships. Most of campus hates me now but I think fundamentally I hope people realize through conversations like this that reform is genuinely needed and if there's one I think it's important to say if there's one group of people who really have a shot of success it's the people here. You know, they're up until 2AM Monday through Sunday. Those should not recognize weekends. We're working all the time. Speaker 0: Inspired you to drop out of Harvard to do this? Speaker 2: You know there's a lot of reform that's needed. I think the value of this and the impact here is so much more vast than anything you could learn in a classroom doing computer science. Speaker 0: And you guys are sleeping here. I'm hearing you guys are up all night. You have this meeting at 10:00 every Wednesday. Speaker 2: We'll probably, go back to work right after this. Yeah. Speaker 0: You're going back to work after this. Speaker 7: Yes. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: It's almost 11:00. So that's early. Speaker 2: That's early. Speaker 0: It's early? Can I go to bed? Speaker 1: That's Speaker 0: an incredible work ethic. You guys should be really, really proud of yourself. Do good people come up to you and say thank you for doing what you're doing? Absolutely. There are Speaker 1: people Speaker 11: in the state department that will stop you or all of the agencies that we've been to that'll stop you in the hallways or write emails and say, was scared to write this or I don't know if you're interested in this, but they usually have great ideas. And if they often have the best ideas because they've worked in the places and they've been stifled by the bureaucracy for so many years. So one of the the great things that at least in my experience that I you know, we listen to them and empower them. Speaker 1: Yes, in Speaker 5: fact, I'd like Speaker 1: to emphasize that because we'd like to just give a big thank you to all the government employees who are helping reduce the waste and fraud because this is, you know, we really couldn't do it without you. So Speaker 0: It's a group effort. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. So it's I'm not trying to sort of say all government employees are bad. That's absolutely not the case. It's just that, you know, there actually just there's need to be a serious effort to reduce the waste waste and forward. And we're just making that happen and a lot of people in the government are very glad to see it Speaker 6: happen. I think it's really important to recognize every single person around this table that's embedded within an agency is supporting that agency whether they're working on systems or working through people. We are encountering droves of government employees who are missionaries not mercenaries who are actually here serving because they believe in what they're doing they want to do things well. We are trying to empower them and they feel empowered now to ask the question of why, why aren't we doing this, what else can we be doing, how can we fix this and I think agency by agency it is filled with exceptional government employees right and we when we give them the tools when we give them the systems and we leave behind systems to help them do their jobs better that's the permanent change right and they're embracing that not because it's new to them it's because it's something they've always wanted to do but for the first time ever we're giving them the tools and the collaboration to be able to do that. Speaker 0: It's a very important message. That message needs to get out a lot more I'm so glad you said that. Speaker 6: We have exceptional people at all of our agencies, exceptional. Speaker 0: I mean they do a thankless job and they work incredibly hard. I love to hear how collaborative it is with these people in these agencies and it's not all conflict. Sometimes in the media you always hear about conflict and you guys are considered these ruthless suits that come in and scare people, but it's Conflict is the exception. Speaker 1: There is conflict, but that is the exception. That's actually true of history in general. You know, there's people study the wars a lot, but actually most of the time there wasn't war. Speaker 0: It's just not as exciting. Speaker 1: It's just not as exciting. Right. Exactly. Speaker 0: Well, for the TV guys, we like conflict, but in this case, we love the collaboration. So thank you guys. Thanks for allowing me this access in here. You guys are just really, really bright, young, smart Patriots. And you have a great team. And thank you, Elon, for everything you've done for the country. We really appreciate it. We're eternally grateful. Speaker 1: You're welcome. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Babies and d*ad people are getting hundreds of millions of your tax dollars for their small businesses.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

DOGE uncovered the Small Business Administration gave $330M in loans to “d*ad people” (people over the age of 120). But wait, it gets worse. “Social Security numbers that showed at the time of the loan they had listed as over 115 years old or actually under 11.” Musk: “Babies and dead people getting loans.” Donald P.: “That was $660M.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people, people over 115 years old, and even people with birthdates in the future. The total amount of loans given to those who were either babies, dead, or not even born yet was $660,000,000. One instance included someone with a birthdate more than a century from now. The question is whether these errors are due to fraud or typos.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? The answer was yes, and it was around $330,000,000 in total. Speaker 1: So People with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So the safe to say if anybody is in the in the system as a hundred and 15 years or older, that is fake. Speaker 2: So just by sharing a database and looking at social security numbers that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over a hundred and 15 years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Speaker 1: Babies and dead Speaker 2: 11 years old. That's pretty clear. Speaker 1: Babies and dead people who were getting loans. Speaker 2: That was $660,000,000. Speaker 1: Yeah. And also people with birth dates in the future. What does that mean? Well, in one I mean, I think the like the birth date, the birth date, I think in '1 case was like Fetuses? We're getting No, not even. No. Really sort of like, you're talking about like your great grandchildren. Like, like, with the birth date, like, I think it was like 02/1965. So more than a century from now was the birth date. George Jetson was getting paid. Yes. Because your birthday is in the future, like the far like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong. It's either a typo or someone stealing. Which is it? Yes. Right. Yes. You at least ask which is it.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Congrats you are funding alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala through jam.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

The young DOGE geniuses discovered the Inter-American Foundation (IAF), which receives $50M a year in Congressional funding to give grants to things like alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala through jam. “You might expect in the private sector a non-profit to give 80-90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes toward management, travel.” Musk: “Most of the money never made it out of D.C.” Waters: “So what percentage do you think doesn’t even get to the destination it’s supposed to?” Musk: “Only 10 to 15 cents on the dollar actually gets to the end recipient.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Inter American Foundation (IAF) receives $50 million annually from Congress for grants, funding projects like alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. While private sector nonprofits typically allocate 80-90% of funds to grantees, IAF gives 58%, with the remainder covering management and travel. According to the GAO, only 10 to 15 cents of each dollar actually reaches the intended recipient. Much of the money remains in DC, allegedly benefiting individuals in the area rather than reaching Peru.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Extreme examples of non, accountability in some cases is has occurred at some of the small agencies. I think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where, you know, they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like, you know, alpaca farming in Peru, improving them Speaker 1: That's a that's a real example. Speaker 0: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Fruit jam. And yes. Speaker 1: What? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. So you might expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes towards management Oh, yeah. Travel. Speaker 1: What what we find exactly I mean, to as an example is is that even if you agreed with up with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, Well, actually, most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in in the neighborhood. What percentage And then get to Peru. Speaker 0: Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to? Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates this is not our estimate. I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢, and the dollar actually gets to the end recipient. Whether you agree with that cause Speaker 0: or

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Save the baby pandas!

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Elon Musk: "These programs, these grants are going to be like along the lines of ‘save the baby pandas,’ and it’s like of course who wouldn't want to save the baby pandas?… In some cases they've got a show panda which they'll trot out for special occasions. In a lot of cases they don't even have a show panda.” Jesse Watters: “No panda?” Elon Musk: “There's not even one panda cause we ask for pictures and we don't even get one panda… What does a billion dollars get you? Does it not even get you one panda?" Jesse Watters: "You really want to see a baby panda." Elon Musk: "Yeah!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
These grants are framed as universally appealing, like "save the baby pandas." However, some programs have a "show panda" for special occasions, while others have no panda at all, despite significant funding. When asked for pictures, they can't even produce one panda. Similarly, with Ebola money, the speaker questions where the funds are going. The money is allegedly going to Deloitte in DC, raising questions about why an accounting firm is handling Ebola funds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These programs, these grants are gonna be like along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And and, you know, in some cases, they've got a show panda, which they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, they don't even have a show panda. No panda. There's not even one panda. And because we asked for pictures and we don't even get one panda. And it's like, well, you gotta, well, that's a lot, you know, what's the what's what does a billion dollars get you? Does it not even get you one panda? You really wanna see a baby panda? Yeah. That will, like, you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with, like, we shouldn't have Ebola, you know. Where is the money going? Oh, it's going to Deloitte in DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money?

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

It takes federal employees 6-months to retire. https://t.co/yl8sJ4dQpc

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

SHOCKING: It takes a federal employee 6 months to retire from the government because workers in a mine move papers around in shopping carts, compiling all the necessary paperwork to retire from the government. When the folder is complete, it’s “thicker than The Lord of the Rings trilogy.” Musk: “If someone wants to retire, they can’t because it takes 6 months to compile the paper and carry the paper into a mine where it is stored, and all the calculations are done by hand.” “The record [for the most amount of paper for a federal employee’s retirement]… is several shopping carts.” Joe G.: “There’s a whole pallet for one retiree with 27 boxes of paper on it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Replica case folders are used when government employees retire. Compiling these folders is done by hand and takes six months. The process involves moving the folders around on carts through a mine for storage. Calculations are also done by hand. The speaker states that processing these folders is more difficult than doing taxes in the dark. They are bringing this retirement process online with modern software. As of tonight, 25 retirees are going through an entirely online retirement process for the first time. This is a collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. The record for one retiree is a whole pallet with 27 boxes of paper.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's why it takes six months. Mhmm. What what is that? So these are replica case folders that people use to retire from the government. And so these are all compiled by hand and moved around on carts through the mind. It takes many months to do that, and this one is a single retiree's paper required to leave the government. So if somebody wants to retire, they can't because it takes six months to compile the paper and carry the paper into a mine where it is stored. And also, all the calculations are done by hand. Everything has to done by Reconciled, adjudicated, this is thicker than the word of the rings trilogy. Yeah. And if I had to process this, I would rather do my taxes in the dark than have to go through this. And so what we're doing is we're we're bringing this process online with modern software. And I'm excited to share that as of tonight, we have 25 retirees going through an entirely online retirement process in the government for the very first time. It sounds so simple. Yes. And and it it's great collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. So this has always been their dream, we're just here to help accelerate it. That's a pretty fat stack. Was that Kissinger's? Oh, no. This the record is almost I mean, several shopping carts. For there's a whole pallet for one retiree with 27 boxes of paper on it. For one guy. That's the record. I've seen it with my own eyes.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

There is a law that requires the U.S. Postal Service to have a balanced budget even though they have lost money every year since 2007. https://t.co/C6eFaUtnso

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Mules deliver mail in the Grand Canyon, and a law mandates the U.S. Postal Service maintain a balanced budget. Since 2007, the Postal Service has lost money. Alex S.: “I think [the mules] can be modernized… I think a lot of people don’t realize that there’s actually a law that says the Post Office is supposed to have a balanced budget.” Musk: “There is?… Well, that’s not working, is it?... So they’re breaking the law?” Alex S.: “They’re breaking the law… Every year since 2007, they’ve lost money.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss mules delivering mail to the bottom of the Grand Canyon and whether this system should be modernized. They then discuss the postal service, stating that many people don't realize there's a law requiring the post office to have a balanced budget. Since 2007, the postal service has reportedly lost money almost every year. According to the speakers, additional regulations put in place around that time crippled the postal service and put them on a bad path. They believe the postal service is stuck in the past and losing money. While they appreciate postal employees going to the hardest parts of the country, they think the postal service can be modernized and become profitable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was a story I heard about mules. There were mules delivering mail to the bottom of the Grand Canyon. Speaker 1: Which might not not might not be a bad thing, actually. You have the mule picture. Speaker 0: Yeah. Pics or it doesn't exist. Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. But this and this this is a case where actually it might not I think do we agree with the mule or or or should should there be mules? I think it can be modernized. If there's opportunity for improvement. Yes. Right. Okay. Right. So, yeah, I'm at the postal service. I I think a lot of people don't realize that there's actually a law that says that the post office is supposed to, like, have a balanced budget. There is? Yeah. There is. I didn't know that. Yeah. Right. Well, that's not working, is it? No. It's not. So So they're breaking the law? They're breaking the law. Okay. Basically, since 02/2007, almost every year since 02/2007, they've they've lost money. So you might ask, like, what happened in 02/2007? Yeah. There was there was What happened 02/2007? Yeah. There was additional regulation Okay. That went into place that essentially crippled them and put them down this, like, not good path where they essentially are stuck in the past as well as bleeding money left and right. Okay. So, like, it's great, and and we appreciate that the postal employees are are willing to go to the hardest parts, like, in this country, but we think that we can we can modernize it and and help them become profitable.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

Meet"'Big Balls" https://t.co/WnF5JOXeLJ

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

DOGE Super Genius “Big Balls” is revealed: Jesse Watters: “Who’s Big Balls?” Edward Coristine: “That’s me!” Elon Musk: “That should be obvious.” Jesse Watters: “What does Big Balls do?” Edward Coristine: “One of our initiatives is to root out fraud and waste, and to do that, we started looking at the payment computers… There’s no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer.” “You look at a specific line item, like $20M, like okay. Well, what is this money going to? And for the majority of payment systems, it’s like, ‘Well, we don’t really know.’”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Big Balls" says that "Big Balls" is their LinkedIn username because people on LinkedIn take themselves too seriously and are adverse to risk, and they wanted to be neither of those things. "Big Balls" is working on payment computer stuff to root out fraud and waste. There is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. When looking at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, for the majority of payment systems, they don't know what the money is going to. This is a huge cause for concern because the upstream thing which is distributing the money literally has no checks, and no accountability to the actual American taxpayer, making it a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse. There is no incentive if you work in the government to respect taxpayer money, and incentives decide the outcomes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We finally ask the one question on our mind. Who's Big Balls? It's me. That should be obvious. Why do they call you Big Balls? I just said it's my LinkedIn username. Okay. Well, people on LinkedIn take themselves, like, super seriously, and they're pretty adverse to risk. And I was like, well, I wanna be neither of those things. So I just I said it and then, honestly, I didn't even think anyone would notice. Yeah. When you clicking this so cringe. What does BigBalls do? Right now, I'm working on some payment computer stuff. So one of our initiatives is to root out fraud and waste. And to do that, we started looking at the payment computers. And as mentioned earlier, like, there is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. So, like, you look at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, and you're like, okay. Well, what is this money going to? And for the majority of payment systems, it's like, well, we don't really know. And They're like, what? That would be the response. Is this the most basic responses? Yeah. Yeah. That's the most common response. What do you say when people just say, I don't know. Well, it's a huge cause for concern because like, the upstream thing which is distributing the money literally has no checks, and no no accountability to the actual American taxpayer. So it's a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse. Do these people not respect taxpayer money? I mean, there's no incentive to you if you work in the government. I think the incentives will always decide the outcomes. Yes.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

DOGE employees have sacrificed everything to serve our country, including dropping out of Harvard University. https://t.co/I3jAFnTlnH

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

A DOGE super genius reveals he dropped out of Harvard University to join the DOGE team and serve his country. “I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country, and it’s been unfortunate to see lost friendships. Most of campus hates me now.” “Reform is genuinely needed… If there’s one group of people who really have a shot of success, it’s the people here.” “[DOGE members are] up until 2 a.m. Monday through Sunday. DOGE does not recognize weekends. We’re working all day long.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they dropped out of Harvard to serve their country and pursue reform, despite receiving email threats and losing friendships. They believe campus sentiment has turned against them. The speaker expresses hope that people will recognize the need for reform and that the people working there have the best chance of achieving it, working constantly. They believe the impact of their work is more valuable than anything they could have learned in a computer science classroom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Both of us have gotten email threats from reporters and the public alike. I think speaking for myself I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country and it's been unfortunate to see you know lost friendships, most of campus hates me now, but I think fundamentally I hope people realize through conversations like this that reform is genuinely needed and if there's one, I think this is important to say, there's one group of people who really have a shot of success it's the people here. Know they're up until 2AM Monday through Sunday. Those should not recognize weekends. We're working all the time. What inspired you to drop out of Harvard to do this? You know there's a lot of, reform that's needed. I think the value of this and the impact here is so much more vast than anything you could learn in a classroom doing computer science.
RedWave_Press
Posted - April 16, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 3:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it appalling that the family of Karmelo Anthony, accused of murder, has launched a website selling t-shirts to fund his legal defense. They've already raised over $400,000 through an online fundraiser. The site attempts to justify his alleged actions by highlighting an incident from 2021 where he supposedly saved a child from drowning, portraying him as brave and selfless. The message concludes with a pledge of unwavering support for him.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

DISGUSTING: The family of alleged mu-derer Karmelo Anthony has set up a website selling t-shirts to bankroll his legal fund. This is on top of the more than $400,000 already raked in through an online fundraiser. The website for Karmelo Anthony even tries to justify his alleged st-bbing of Austin Metcalf by claiming he saved a child from drowning in 2021. “On May 15, 2021, Karmelo saw a child drowning. Without hesitation, without thinking twice about his own safety, he acted. He didn’t wait. He didn’t panic. He saved a life. That moment showed not just bravery—it showed a deep sense of honor and selflessness that few can understand.” “Thank you, Karmelo. We see you. We stand with you. Always.” @SarahisCensored was the first to break this story!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tweet a tapping in. If you fuck with me and my music, you gotta fuck with Carmelo Hittman, man. Just for my dog. Website coming soon. You gotta tap in.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you know what it is. Tweet a tapping in. Anybody who fuck with me, fuck with my music, you gotta fuck with Carmelo Hittman, man. Just for my dog. Website coming soon. You gotta tap in, man. Yeah.
RedWave_Press
Posted - April 14, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 4:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Harvard University is standing firm against the Trump administration's demands, risking $9 billion in federal funding. The university emphasizes its commitment to independence and constitutional rights, asserting that no government should dictate its academic freedom. Harvard President Alan Garber reinforced this stance, highlighting the importance of autonomy in teaching, admissions, and research. In response, the U.S. Department of Education has announced a freeze on approximately $2.3 billion in federal funds to Harvard.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

NEW: Harvard is playing a dangerous game of FAFO after announcing it will “not accept” the Trump administration’s demands, putting $9 billion in federal funding at risk. Harvard University statement on 𝕏: “The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. Neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government." “No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” said Harvard President Alan Garber

Video Transcript AI Summary
Harvard's lawyers stated the university will not comply with the Trump administration's demands, arguing the demands exceed lawful authority. The administration had threatened to pull federal funding from Ivy League schools not adequately addressing antisemitism on campus, and has already done so. Harvard's response suggests they are challenging the administration's actions. A response from the administration is expected soon.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. Breaking just moments ago, Harvard's lawyers say that the university will not comply with the Trump administration's demands in a brand new letter. It reads in part, quote, Harvard is not prepared to agree to demands that go beyond the law ful authority of this or any administration. Sandra, the administration had been threatening to pull federal funding from a lot of these Ivy League schools if they didn't get their ducks in order when it comes to fighting antisemitism on campus. They're not bluffing. They've already pulled the funding. So Harvard's essentially saying are they trying to call bluff here? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I imagine there will be a quick response and we'll have that for you when it happens.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: The U.S. Department of Education said on Monday it was freezing about $2.3 billion in federal funds to Harvard University, according to Reuters.

RedWave_Press
Posted - April 11, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Saved - April 12, 2025 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The pilot of the Bell 206 helicopter that tragically crashed into the Hudson River, resulting in the deaths of a family of five from Spain, has been identified as 36-year-old Navy SEAL veteran Sean Johnson. He had recently relocated to New York City to advance his aviation career. In a statement, his wife, Kathryn Johnson, expressed her shock and confusion over the incident. The National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration are currently investigating the cause of the crash. Johnson had shared a video of himself flying the helicopter just weeks prior.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: The pilot of the Bell 206 helicopter that crashed into the Hudson River k-lling a family of five from Spain has been identified as 36-year-old Navy SEAL veteran Sean Johnson, according to Gothamist. Johnson had just moved to New York City to further his aviation career, according to family members and his social media profile. “ I'm just at loss for words. I don't even know what happened,” Johnson’s wife Kathryn Johnson told Gothamist. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are investigating the cause of the crash. Johnson posted the video below to social media back on March 27 flying the Bell 206 helicopter in Lower Manhattan.

RedWave_Press
Posted - April 11, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 1:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Agustin Escobar, the President and CEO of Siemens in Spain, tragically died in a helicopter crash in the Hudson River, along with his wife and three children. They had just arrived in Manhattan from Barcelona earlier that day. A photo of the family was featured on the New York Helicopter Tours website. The pilot's identity is still unknown, and authorities are investigating the cause of the crash.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: Agustin Escobar, President and CEO of Siemens in Spain, along with his wife and their three children, were identified as the victims of the helicopter that plunged into the Hudson River in New York City on Thursday, according to the New York Post. The New York Helicopter Tours website featured a photo of the family of five posing in front of the Bell 206L-4 LongRanger IV helicopter. Law enforcement reported that the family had arrived in Manhattan from Barcelona earlier that day. The pilot’s identity remains unknown, and the cause of the crash is under investigation.

RedWave_Press
Posted - February 28, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 11:38 PM

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: President Zelenskyy refuses to apologize to President Trump for disrespecting him and the American people today in the Oval Office. Bret Baier: “So I'm not hearing from you, Mr. President, a thought that you owe the President an apology.” Zelenskyy: “No…” https://t.co/4YlZZIAQGT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I respect the President and the American people. We need to be open and honest, and I'm not sure we did anything wrong. Some things are better discussed outside the media, with all respect to democracy and a free media. It's important to understand Ukraine's and Ukrainians' positions. We are partners, very close partners. We have to be fair and very free.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'm not hearing from you, mister president, a thought that you owe the president an apology. No. I respect president, and I respect American people. And if, I don't know if I think that we have to be very open and very honest, and I'm not sure that we did something bad. I think maybe sometimes some some some things we have to discuss, out of out of media with all respect to democracy and to a free media, but there are things that where we have to understand the position of Ukraine and Ukrainians. And, I think that is the most important thing. Yes. We are partners. You know? We are very close partners. We have to be fair. We have to be we have to be very free. I'm
RedWave_Press
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 6:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jim Acosta is reportedly out at CNN after being moved to the midnight slot. I remember when President Trump had a heated exchange with him, criticizing CNN for having him on air and calling him a rude person. It was quite a moment in their contentious relationship.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

BREAKING: Jim Acosta is reportedly out at CNN after being banished to the midnight time (EST) slot on the network. Flashback to when President Trump slapped Jim Acosta all over the White House in a heated exchange: “I’ll tell you what, CNN should be ashamed of itself having you work for them.” “You are a rude, terrible person, you shouldn’t be working for CNN. You are a very rude person.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the midterms, a discussion arose about a caravan of migrants from Central America. One party characterized it as an invasion, while the other disagreed, emphasizing the need for legal immigration processes. The president insisted on the necessity of immigrants for economic growth, despite the caravan being far from the border. Tensions escalated when questions about the Russia investigation were raised, with the president dismissing them as a hoax. The president criticized a CNN reporter for being rude and unprofessional, claiming CNN spreads fake news and labeling them as the enemy of the people. Another reporter defended the first, but the president continued to express his disdain for the media's portrayal of his administration and the fearmongering surrounding Democrats and crime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the midterms. That is Here we go. That well, if you don't mind, mister president come on. That this caravan was an invasion. As you know, mister president as you know, mister president, caravan was not an invasion. It's a it's a a group of migrants moving up from Central America towards the border with The US. Speaker 1: Thank you for telling me that. Speaker 0: Why why did you why did you characterize it as such? Speaker 1: And Because I consider it an invasion. You and I have a difference of opinion. Speaker 0: Do you think that you demonized immigrants in this election to try to keep Speaker 1: I want them I want them to come into the country, but they have to come in legally. You know, they have to come in, Jim, through a process. I want it to be a process, and I want people to come in. And we need the people to go in. Speaker 0: Your campaign your campaign Wait. Speaker 1: You know why we need the people, don't you? Because we have hundreds of companies moving in. We need the people. Speaker 0: They're hundreds of miles away, though. They're hundreds and hundreds of miles away. That that's not an invasion. Speaker 1: Honestly? You know why? Speaker 0: That that's not an invasion. Speaker 1: Honestly? I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN. Alright. And if you did it well, your ratings Speaker 0: Let me ask if I may ask 1 other question. Mister president, I That's enough. Speaker 1: I was gonna ask 1 Speaker 0: of the the other folks Speaker 1: that That's enough. Speaker 0: Pardon me, ma'am. I'm I'm mister president. Speaker 1: That's enough. Speaker 0: Mister president, I had 1 other question. If I may ask on on the Russia investigation, are you concerned that that you may have Speaker 1: I'm not concerned about anything with the Russian investigation because it's a hoax. Are you That's enough. Put down the mic. Speaker 0: Mister president, are you worried about indictments coming down in this Speaker 2: Mister president. Mister president. Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. CNN should be ashamed of itself, having you working for them. You are a rude, terrible person. You shouldn't be working for CNN. Go ahead. Speaker 2: I I think that's unfair. Speaker 1: A very rude person. The way you treat Sarah Huckabee is horrible, and the way you treat other people are horrible. You shouldn't treat people that way. Go ahead. Speaker 2: In in Go Speaker 1: ahead. Peter. Go ahead. Speaker 2: In in Jim's defense, I've traveled with him and watched him. He's reporter who busts Speaker 0: his butt. Speaker 1: I'm not a big fan of yours either, so Speaker 2: I understand. To be honest. So let me so let me ask you a question if I can. You repeatedly said You Speaker 1: are you are the best. Speaker 2: Mister president, you repeatedly o over the course of Speaker 1: I mean, just sit down, please. Well, when you when you report fake news no. When you report fake news, which CNN does a lot, you are the enemy of the people. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Mister president, over the course over the course of the last several days of the campaign, sir, sir, at the end of the campaign, you repeatedly said that Americans need to fear Democrats. You said it would unleash a wave of violent crime that endangers families everywhere. Why are you Speaker 1: committing to very weak crime. Speaker 2: Why are you
RedWave_Press
Posted - August 28, 2024 at 3:09 PM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 2:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An illegal immigrant and MS-13 gang member, Fredy Antonio Amaya-Mari, is facing up to eight counts of attempted murder after shooting at passing vehicles in Philadelphia, Mississippi. His motive remains unclear. Amaya-Mari, originally from El Salvador, had been deported in 2007 but reentered the U.S. illegally. He is also facing federal charges for illegal reentry and possession of a firearm as an illegal alien. ICE is currently holding him without bond.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

An illegal immigrant MS-13 gang member is facing up to eight counts of attempted mu*der after sh**ting at multiple passing vehicles in Philadelphia, Mississippi, last week. Fredy Antonio Amaya-Mari, an El Salvador national, shot at moving vehicles on Beacon Street with his motive unknown before being arrested by Philadelphia police. Authorities learned that Amaya-Mari had previously been deported back to El Salvador in 2007 and reentered the country illegally again. The El Salvador national is also being held on federal charges of illegal reentry after deportation and being an illegal alien in possession of a f*rearm. ICE is holding the illegal immigrant without bond.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Freddy Antonio Amaya Marin, 39, from El Salvador, was arrested after allegedly shooting at vehicles and then officers from the woods outside his home. He faces 8 counts of attempted murder, federal charges for illegal reentry after deportation, and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm. Amaya Marin was previously deported in 2007 and illegally returned to the US. He is a confirmed member of a violent international street gang. He is being held without bond, and additional charges are possible. Three people were reported injured and are expected to recover. The US Attorney General's Office and Homeland Security are involved in the investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Suspect was originally identified as 31 year old Jonathan Salvador of Mexico. He's now been identified as 39 year old Freddy Antonio Amaya Marin from El Salvador. Officers say the suspect stood in the woods outside his home and shot at multiple vehicles driving down the street until police arrived on the scene. He then began shooting at officers, and they returned fire. The suspect was arrested shortly after. Investigators are working with multiple agencies, including the US Attorney General's Office and Homeland Security. Amaya Marin faces 8 counts of attempted murder and federal charges for illegal reentry after deportation, an illegal alien in possession of a firearm. Authorities tell THROUGHINGER SIDE this is not his first incident. The 39 year old was deported back to El Salvador back in 2007 and returned to the US illegally. He's also a confirmed member of a violent international street gang. Now Maya Marin is being held without bond and additional charges are possible. As for the victims, only 3 people were reported injured during this incident and they are all expected to make a full recovery.
RedWave_Press
Posted - April 24, 2024 at 8:15 PM
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 9:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pro-Palestinian protesters at USC and the University of Texas at Austin were met with police intervention and arrests as they attempted to establish camps on university property. USC Public Safety officers removed tents and scuffles ensued, with police resorting to batons for self-protection. The University of Texas at Austin Department of Public Safety officers also broke up the protest and made multiple arrests.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

𝐍𝐄𝐖: The University of Southern California (USC) and the University of Texas at Austin have descended into chaos after police began arresting pro-Palestinian protesters trying to establish camps on University property. USC Public Safety officers took down tents of pro-Palestinian protesters who were trying to establish an encampment. Scuffles broke out as Police have now begun to arrest protesters on USC’s campus. Officers even took out their batons to protect themselves against the protesters. The University of Texas at Austin Department of Public Safety officers broke up pro-Palestinian protesters trying to establish a camp on campus and then began making mass arrests. USC Texas at Austin

RedWave_Press
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 8:09 PM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 8:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Members of Congress were shown graphic footage of Hamas terrorists' atrocities against Israeli civilians. Rep. McCaul reaffirmed the US commitment to Israel. Representatives from both parties expressed shock and condemned the violence. Rep. Lawler couldn't fathom the reasons behind such acts. The article emphasizes the urgency for Israel to eliminate Hamas.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

⬇️ 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡: Yesterday members of Congress were shown a private screening of the graphic footage taken by Hamas terrorists of their atrocities against Israeli civilians on October 7th. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Tx, reacted to the footage he saw. He reiterated the United States' commitment to Israel in their fight against Hamas. 🔊 “𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮, 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 — 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞.” Representatives from both parties were shaken by what they saw. 🔊 Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI): “𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐇𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐬 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐧𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐢 𝐜𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬. 𝐈’𝐦 𝐠𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲. 𝐖𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭.” Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA): "𝐈'𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈'𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐥𝐲, 𝐈'𝐦 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐜𝐡." Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-MD): “𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝟐𝟏𝐬𝐭-𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟒𝐭𝐡-𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨.” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY): said he couldn’t imagine how “𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐜𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞-𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭.” ⛔️ Israel must go in and take out Hamas once and for all.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This morning, the Israeli ambassador and I watched a disturbing video of the Hamas invasion, where Jewish people were brutally killed. The video showed horrific scenes, including the killing of a baby in front of its mother and the rape and torture of women. It is clear that Hamas is a violent and messianic cult. We must remember that the real victims are the Jewish people. Anti-Semitism is on the rise, and Israel is fighting for its existence. Prime Minister Netanyahu is determined to eradicate Hamas and return Gaza to the Palestinians. The Senate must pass the Israeli funding bill to provide the necessary weapons and support in this fight against terror.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This morning, I worked with the Israeli ambassador to screen a private screening of the Hamas invasion barbaric killing of Jewish people, 1400 of them, 2 50 hostages, scenes that I can't get into detail about because they're so disgusting. And the thing is, the worst part of it wasn't even in the video, ripping baby out of a mother's womb before eyes and killing her child before they killed her, the raping of old women, young women, the torture, the violence, They are messianic cult, they are terror organization. I think If anything, they wanted members to see this to never forget, to remember what happened on October 7th as We see the narrative shifting that somehow the Palestinians are the victims. Well, I can assure you everybody who saw that video today knows who the real victims are. The victims were the Jewish people. Now, I went to the just a year ago within Speaker McCarthy and to think that all of them are dead that the daycare center was and children were burned alive and beheaded in front of their parents, and then they killed their parents after that. I'm a son of a World War II veteran, my dad bombed the Nazis. They bombed the Nazis who were killing the Jews. I thought This was over after that war, but this was the largest killing of Jews since the Holocaust. As Madam Chair mentioned, anti Semitism is now on the rise in this country. It's not It's unacceptable. Israel is fighting for its own existence. I just got back from there, met with Prime Minister in Netanyahu and he is stronger than ever. And he is determined to eradicate Hamas, deradicalize Gaza and turn it back back over to the Palestinian people after they are freed from their oppressor, their terror oppressor Hamas. It remind Churchill and his fight, this is a fight not only for survival, but a fight for their own very existence right now, and it's critically important that the Senate passed the Israeli funding bill that we passed here in the house should have been And yesterday as the Prime Minister told me that it needs to be done as soon as possible. They need the weapons to win. The Prime Minister said, we need ammo, ammo, ammo. That is what we need in this fight against terror to defend the Jewish
RedWave_Press
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 12:52 AM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 2:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration is bypassing 26 laws to construct a border wall in South Texas, as announced by the Department of Homeland Security. A video captures illegal immigrants crossing into El Paso, Texas.

@RedWave_Press - RedWave Press

𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬: The Biden administration is waiving 26 federal laws to allow them to build a border wall in South Texas. The announcement was made by the Department of Homeland Security on the federal registry. “𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬.” Video was taking of illegal immigrants crossing into El Paso, Texas. 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐧 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧?

View Full Interactive Feed