TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RepDonaldsPress

Saved - January 12, 2025 at 1:16 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE the Biden admin has allowed the Chinese Communist Party to: 🦠Get away with COVID-19 📸Spy on us through TikTok 🧑‍🌾Buy-up our farmland 🎈Violate our sovereignty Now we learn China is operating SECRET POLICE STATIONS in US cities. We need to defend ourselves! https://t.co/2tukRNMvUm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four Chinese police stations are currently operating in the US: two in New York City, one in Los Angeles, and one in an undisclosed location. The Chinese Communist Party is also suspected of establishing similar stations in numerous countries worldwide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are at least 4 Chinese police stations currently operating inside the US, 2 in New York City, 1 in Los Angeles, and another in an undisclosed location. The CCP is also suspected of setting up other stations in dozens of countries around the globe.
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 11:20 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

Why the Senate Border Deal FAILED: 1–Codify Catch/Release 2–Let in 1.8M Illegals 3–Fund Sanctuary Cities 4–Fund NGOs Moving Illegals 5–Lawyers to Illegals 6–Work Permits to Illegals 7–Nothing to Deport Illegals 8–No Immediate Wall Funds 9–Weak Asylum Screening 10–$60B to Ukraine https://t.co/jSqONZgLvC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker aims to clarify the situation regarding the Senate bill and HR 2. Upon the Senate bill's release, House members, including the speaker, deemed it unacceptable due to its failure to secure the southern border. House Republicans had previously passed HR 2, border security measures, over a year prior. Chuck Schumer has not brought it up for debate or a vote in the Senate. The White House has not contacted Speaker Johnson to negotiate or compromise on HR 2. The speaker states that House Republicans opposed the Senate bill before Donald Trump voiced his opinion, considering it a "trash bill."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need to set the record straight about the senate bill and actually HR too. When the senate bill was actually published, I remember I was in a I was at a dinner, Sunday night when it came out. When the text came out, I read the text of the senate bill. Many members in the house read the text of Senate bill. Members contacted speaker Johnson, and we were very clear. There should there is no way the Senate bill should get a vote in the house because it is a terrible piece of legislation that will not secure the southern border. House Republicans have passed border security measures, HR 2. We did it more than a year ago. Has Chuck Schumer brought it up for even debate or a vote in the Senate? No. He has not. Has the White House decided to reach out to the speaker Johnson to debate and deliberate or negotiate or compromise on HR 2 and its elements to secure the southern border? No. They have not. They're in charge in the Senate and in the White House. They've done nothing, except the bill that couldn't even make it out of the Senate. So I think it's important to set the record straight. Oh, also, by the way, house Republicans weren't gonna vote for that bill, and that was before Donald Trump even made his his view known on the senate compromise bill. We were already against it when the bill text came out because this is a trash bill. Now moving on.
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 8:41 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

If our nation's colleges & universities are to receive federal funding, they MUST ensure that the civil rights of their Jewish students are protected. If school presidents & staff refuse to uphold the civil rights of Jewish students, they should be FIRED. This CANNOT continue. https://t.co/RlOX4IKD1M

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some colleges with huge endowments should not rely on government funding. If they want federal money, they must prioritize students' civil rights. College leaders who fail to do so should be replaced by trustees for the good of the institution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, listen. That's not a bad idea. Some of these endowments are massive, and it's the same colleges that come to state governments and the federal government looking for more money, looking for these grant programs. If you have if you have 1,000,000,000 of dollars in your endowment, why are you coming and looking at us? Take care of it yourself if this is what you wanna do on your campus. But if you're gonna get federal dollars, then the civil rights of students has to be protected first and foremost. And if you have college presidents or senior college staffs that do not wanna do that, then those trustees at these universities, they need to get rid of those people because they are actually doing what's in the worst interest of those institutions.
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 2:28 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

BACK IN APRIL: Clinton campaign CFO Gary Gensler claimed UNDER OATH he was unaware they facilitated payment for the Steele Dossier. YESTERDAY: Despite conflicting testimony, he again feigned ignorance. I ask again, how could a campaign CFO possibly be unaware of a $1M+ payment? https://t.co/jU9jSMlUWe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1, who was the CFO of Hillary Clinton's campaign, about facilitating payment for the Steele Dossier. Speaker 1 denies any knowledge of it. Speaker 0 brings up John Podesta's involvement and accuses Speaker 1 of being aware of the campaign's payment for the dossier. Speaker 1 maintains that they were not aware. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for not holding themselves to the same standard as private sector CFOs. Speaker 1 clarifies that the SEC's focus is on financial accuracy, not campaign payments. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking if Speaker 1 accurately paid for the dossier.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are Hillary Clinton's, CFO on a campaign. Right? Speaker 1: It's part of my history. Speaker 0: Were you? Yes or no? Speaker 1: In 2016. Speaker 0: Did you facilitate the payment for the Steele Dossier since you were CFO CFO of the Hillary Clinton campaign? Speaker 1: Sir. Speaker 0: Yes or no? Sir. Yes or no? Speaker 1: That that was that was not You're Speaker 0: under oath, chairman Gensler. Yes or no? I No. Speaker 1: It was not something I was aware of. Speaker 0: Hey. Do you remember where we left off, you and I? Interesting things have occurred since then. John Podesta testified. I I don't know if he signed the checks, but he was there every day, meaning you. Were you aware of the Hillary Clinton campaign paid for the Steele Dossier, which unleashed One of the worst issues of intelligence malfeasance that our nation has ever seen. No. Mister Gensler, I find that very Interesting because some of the people in the staff that have left the SCC, you're very aware of everything that is going on. It's actually your MO. You're you're very hands on, so you're gonna tell the committee right now, you had no idea idea that the Hillary Clinton campaign of which you were the CFO on sent money to Perkins Coie for a dossier that was phony that led to this spying On of a presidential campaign in 2016, you were not aware of any of this. Speaker 1: I was not aware. Speaker 0: Now I find that interesting because you are very tough on CFOs So that they should be aware of everything. So how is that a standard you hold CFOs in the private sector too, but you don't hold yourself to that same standard? Speaker 1: That's not a standard that the SEC CFOs too. It's about their financials and and that the numbers are accurate, and that they're So Speaker 0: did you accurately pay for the old dossier out of the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

These are impeachment vehicles that we should look into as the inquiry begins: (1.) Bribery (2.) Facilitated Hunter's FARA violation (3.) Blatantly violated federal law (ex. student loan bailout & his disastrous mismanagement of the border) These are high crimes & misdemeanors.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden's involvement in bribery doesn't require money to be directly sent to him. If his son, Hunter Biden, spent money on his behalf, that's enough. Additionally, Hunter Biden's actions violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, with Joe Biden's help. Lastly, President Trump's disregard for federal law, such as with student loans and the asylum program, can be seen as high crimes and misdemeanors. These are all potential grounds for impeachment that should be thoroughly examined.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joe Biden doesn't actually need to have had a dollar sent to him. I mean, it's something really as simple as if his son was spending money on his behalf, like the son Hunter Biden told his daughter he had been doing, that's enough for bribery. You don't actually have to have it sitting in your house in a jacket with gold bars back, like Bob Menendez has it right now. Right. So that's that's so I think that's number 1. Number 2, I believe there is clearly a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act by by Hunter Biden and Joe Biden helped facilitate that violation of Sarah. So that's charge number 2. And then number 3, you talk about the lawlessness behalf of this president. It is high crimes and misdemeanors, in my view, for the president of the United States to blatantly violate and ignore federal law. He's done that with student loans. His asylum program, which has opened up our borders to migrants from all over the world. Congress never plated using asylum like this. Those are all the things that I view are impeachment vehicles. We should look at all of them.
Saved - August 31, 2023 at 10:15 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

Biden is set to break the 22-yr tradition of observing 9/11 at The White House or the attack sites. Instead, he'll be returning from climate change meetings in Vietnam. The priorities of this admin are horrifically out-of-touch. We CANNOT allow 9/11 to become a distant memory.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden is facing criticism for not observing the 9/11 anniversary tradition. Instead of being at the White House or one of the attack sites, he will be in Vietnam for a climate change trip. This decision is seen as disrespectful to gold star families and the American people. It also raises concerns about forgetting the significance of 9/11, as it has been 22 years since the attack. Some worry that it may lose its importance, similar to how Pearl Harbor was replaced by 9/11 as the most catastrophic event on American soil.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Biden is drawing criticism over his plans for 911. He's set to break a 22 year old tradition. Every other commander in chief since that horrific day has observed the somber occasion from either the White House or at one of the attack sites. But not this year. President Biden will be wrapping up his climate change trip to Vietnam. We know how he treats gold star families. We know how He treats the American people. This is 1 more nail in that hideous coffin, but it's the biggest slap in the face of them all. There is massive symbolism in this. And what makes me sad about it is I wonder if this is going to set off some sort of trend of we're starting to forget a little bit. It's been 22 years, just like What happened to Pearl Harbor? You know, we started that kind of got replaced by 911 as the most catastrophic thing to ever happen on our soil. And are we now is it losing its importance?
Saved - August 31, 2023 at 1:50 AM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

NARA thought Trump committed the espionage crime of the century.. BUT did nothing when Joe mishandled classified info.. AND did nothing with the 5.3K emails in their possession where Joe used fake names.. This is the bureaucratic joke that is DC & NARA MUST release the emails.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden is accused of violating federal law by not using his official government email. It is claimed that he was aware of his son and brother's activities, as evidenced by emails with fake names. The purpose of using aliases is to have plausible deniability. The National Archives should release these emails. Interestingly, the same National Archives previously made a big deal about Donald Trump having classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. It is now revealed that Biden had similar emails as vice president, and the National Archives is only now disclosing this information. This situation highlights the bureaucratic issues in Washington DC. The release of these emails is crucial, and further investigation is needed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Surprise, surprise. Joe Biden was violating federal law. So, oh, he did not use his official government email? Like, I'm shocked. The reality is is that Joe Biden has known all along what his son and his brother were doing because he's been in on it. And when you have emails with aliases, fake names. The purpose is to give yourself plausible deniability. That that's what Joe Biden was trying to do. The National Archives needs to release those emails. And I also find it funny that whoever the bureaucrat National Archives. They thought that this was the espionage crime of the century that Donald Trump had had had classified documents at Mar a Lago, but now we find out that Joe Biden had him as vice president, and then we also find out now he had these emails with fake names and the National Archives is just now letting people know about this. This is the bureaucratic joke that is happening in Washington DC. Those emails need to be released, and we're gonna get to the bottom of that as
Saved - August 23, 2023 at 8:50 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

Biden’s trillions of reckless & inflationary spending destroyed the housing market: Avg Home Price – OVER $400K Salary Required – OVER $165K Affordability Index – LOWEST EVER Avg Payment (Now) – $2,300/mo Avg Payment (Pre-COVID) – $900/mo This is "Bidenomics" at work.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Existing home sales have dropped for the fourth time in five months, marking a 23-month consecutive decline compared to the previous year. This is the worst streak since the housing boom and subsequent crash. The main factor contributing to this situation is the injection of trillions of dollars into the economy, leading to high inflation levels not seen in decades. As a result, the average home price in America has surpassed $400,000, making it increasingly unaffordable for the average person. The Goldman Sachs affordability index is currently at its lowest point ever, with monthly payments for a house with a 20% down payment averaging around $2,310.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Existing home sales dropping for the 4th time in 5 months. Speaker 1: Existing home sales are down now 23 consecutive months year over year. This is the worst streak since the the housing boom where we end up with a big crash. We're in a serious quandary. How did we get here? All of that free money. You throw in 1,000,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. We had inflation. Of course, we know. We talked talked about this. We spiked to a 40 year high in inflation. Inflation levels we thought we'd never deal with again as a nation. As an older, mature nation. 32 now $1,000,000,000,000 in debt. Right Speaker 0: now, the average Home price in America, if you can believe this. It's gone beyond $400,000. That is really something. With a typical down payment, mortgage rate is 6.6%. To meet your monthly Payments on a new home purchase like that. You would need a salary of over $165,000 in this country. That Is why that affordability is going to levels. We've not seen it before. Speaker 1: The lowest ever. The Goldman Sachs affordability, index is at the lowest ever. Let's just say you wanna buy a house and wanna put 20% down. Your average payment right now for the average person out there. It'd be $23100 a month.
Saved - August 2, 2023 at 10:47 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

The pattern of events surrounding our investigation into the Bidens can't be a coincidence: 3/17 - Hunter admits laptop is his 3/18 - Notice of 1st Trump indictment 6/8 - FBI doc on $5M Biden bribe drops 6/9 - Mar-A-Lago Indictment 7/31 - Archer testifies 8/1 - 1/6 Indictment

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter accidentally admits his laptop is his after Trump receives a notice of indictment. A FBI document reveals that Biden took a $5,000,000 bribe. Devin Archer testifies that Joe was on the phone with Hunter's business partners. These events are followed by indictments against Mar a Lago and Trump. The speaker suggests that these occurrences are coordinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you don't think this is political, look at this. On March 17th, Hunter accidentally admits his laptop is his, the day after Trump gets a notice that he's going to be indicted. June 8th, the FBI document drops that Biden took a $5,000,000 bribe. The next day, June 9th, Mar a Lago indictment. July 31st, Devin Archer testifies that Joe was on the phone with the Hunter of Business Partners. One day later, August 1st, Trump, January 6th indictment. So, this is all coordinated
Saved - June 15, 2023 at 1:46 AM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

What Senator Grassley says, does pan out. Money moved through these various LLCs for concealment from investigators & ended up with the Biden family. Joe LOVES to say the rich need to pay their fair share. Did YOU pay YOUR taxes on that $5M?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Grassley's claims seem to be supported by the document, which states that the Burisma executive possesses information, although the specifics are unknown. Additionally, it is confirmed that the Biden family follows a pattern of moving money through various accounts, a process that would take investigators a decade to trace. This pattern has been observed with funds from China, Romania, and now potentially Ukraine, ultimately ending up in the family's possession. Furthermore, it is mentioned that Joe Biden, who advocates for the wealthy to pay their fair share, should ensure he has paid taxes on the 5... [transcript ends]
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, I think everything that senator Grassley says does pan out because the document does state that the Burisma executive actually has receipts. That's all it says, that he has information but you just don't know what the information is. And then the other piece that definitely pans out is that they moved the money through several accounts that would take investigators 10 years to find. That is the modus operandi of the Biden family, whether the money comes from China, Romania, and now it's looking like Ukraine, they move it through all these LLCs, through all of these accounts, and it ends up in the hands of the family. And by the way, I will add this. Joe Biden likes to say that the rich need to pay their fair share. Well, hey, Joe, did you pay your taxes on that 5
Saved - May 17, 2023 at 6:48 PM

@RepDonaldsPress - Congressman Byron Donalds

If Hunter was under IRS investigation, why did Biden's DOJ shut it down & move it under their purview? That makes no sense & reeks of obstruction. Dems are backpedaling to protect Biden because what's becoming clear is he was selling influence to foreign actors through family.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the situation reeks of obstruction of justice. They question why the investigation into Hunter Biden by a section of the IRS is being shut down and transferred to the Department of Justice. This decision is seen as nonsensical.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And look, this reeks of just obstruction of justice at this point. If Hunter Biden's under investigation by a portion of the IRS and that's continuing to go, why do you have the department of justice then shut it down and move it over to the department of justice? That makes no sense at all.
View Full Interactive Feed