reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Restricted_on_X
@Restricted_on_X - Restricted Daily
We don’t really have a $36 trillion debt. What we have is $21 trillion of our money pumped into underground infrastructure, secret tunnels, and black budget projects the public will never see. The debt? That’s just the distraction they feed you while the real empire gets built beneath your feet.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Catherine Austin Fitz, a former Bush administration official, claims the US government has secretly built a $21 trillion underground city. This was allegedly funded by unaccounted federal spending from the Department of Defense and HUD between 1998 and 2015. Fitz describes over 170 interconnected underground and underwater cities designed to house the powerful during a near extinction event. These facilities are connected by high-speed transit systems and powered by advanced energy technologies unknown to the public. The construction occurred without public knowledge, media coverage, or official announcements. The purpose and implications for the general population remain unclear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A former Bush administration official has come forward with a claim that's difficult to ignore. According to the New York Post, Catherine Austin Fitz says the US government has secretly constructed a $21,000,000,000,000 underground city. She alleges that this was funded through nearly two decades of unaccounted for federal spending, money that vanished from the ledgers of the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development between 1998 and 2015. Fitz describes a network of over 170 underground and underwater facilities, not shelters, cities, built to house the powerful in the event of a near extinction event. She says they're connected by high speed transit systems, hidden beneath the surface of The United States, powered by advanced energy technologies the public has never been allowed to see.
No vote, no announcement, no media coverage, just decades of quiet construction, shielded from public knowledge. If what she's saying is true, then these places already exist. The entrances are in place, the infrastructure is operational, and they aren't meant for everyone. The public was never informed, no explanation has been given, no officials have stepped forward to confirm or deny any part of it. So we have to ask the obvious questions: What do they know?
What are they hiding? And what happens to the rest of us when the doors close?
@Restricted_on_X - Restricted Daily
On 9/11, as America was under attack, George Bush sat in a classroom while kids recited the words: “Plane. Must. Hit. Steel.” That’s not coincidence. That’s a script. Chilling. https://t.co/X3U4kZKbJi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The lesson involves reading words and a story. Students are instructed to look at the letter at the end of a word and remember its sound. Words like "kite," "kick," "steel," "play," and "must" are read aloud, both by sounding them out and reading them quickly. Students are told to open their books to lesson 60 on page 153 and touch the title of the story with their fingers. The title of the story is "The Cat, Go." Students are then told to put their fingers under the first word of the story.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get ready to read all these words on this page without making a mistake. Look at the letter at the end and remember the sound it makes. Get ready. Kite. Yes.
Kite. Get ready to read this word the fast way. Get ready. Kick. Yes.
Kick. Sound it out. Get ready. Kick. What word?
Kick. Yes. Kick. Boys and girls, sound this word out. Get ready.
Beal. What words? Steel. Yes. Steel.
Read these words the fast way. Get ready. Play. Yes. Play.
Get ready. Must. Yes. Must. Let's read these words the fast way without making a mistake.
Get ready. Kite. Yes. Kite. Get ready.
Kite. Yes. Kite. Get ready. Steel.
Yes. Steel. Get ready. Play. Yes.
Playing. Get ready. Must. Yes. Must.
Or if you just pick your reader up from under your seat. Open your book up to lesson 60 on page one fifty three. At the count of three, everyone should be on page one fifty three. If the yellow paper is going to bother you, drop it. Thank you.
Everybody touch the title of your story. Fingers under the title. Get ready to read the title, The Fast Way. We're waiting for one member. Thank you.
Fingers under the title of the story. Get ready. Go, head, go. Yes. The cat, go.
Fingers under the first word of the story. Get ready to
@Restricted_on_X - Restricted Daily
Video Transcript AI Summary
Junior was the front runner for the New York Senate seat in 1999, but after his plane crash, Hillary Clinton was elected. Mary Mahoney, a Clinton intern and key witness during the impeachment trials, was murdered in 1997. In 1993, Vince Foster, White House counsel, was found dead in a park, with his bullet never recovered. James McDougall, a witness for prosecutors, died of a heart attack before testifying while in solitary confinement. In 2015, former White House chef Walter Shive drowned under suspicious circumstances. Seth Rich, a DNC staffer, was shot in DC, with speculation surrounding his death linked to leaked emails. Lastly, Shawn Lucas, an attorney in a DNC fraud case, was found dead in his bathroom, with his death still classified pending an autopsy. Questions about these incidents remain unresolved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Junior, he was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997.
In 1993, White House counsel, Vince Foster, was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement.
In 2015, Walter Shive, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shibe's death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation.
Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified, pending the results of an autopsy. To this day, questions remain.
@Restricted_on_X - Restricted Daily
Ron Paul saw it coming before anyone else. He stood in Congress fighting against the Patriot Act, warning us all. Now, it’s clear: that law was built to target patriots and Americans alike. It’s time for Trump to put an end to it. https://t.co/jqm4uKwK96
Video Transcript AI Summary
I oppose this bill and the extension of the Patriot Act. The 4th Amendment clearly protects our privacy and requires warrants based on probable cause. Over the years, we've diluted these protections, starting with the FISA law in 1978 and further weakened by the events following 9/11. The assumption that sacrificing privacy will make us safer is misguided. The government cannot guarantee safety, and we should not justify invasive measures in the name of security. The purpose of government is to protect our liberties, not to ensure perfect safety. We are extending parts of the law that have raised concerns and were previously sunsetted for good reason. This bill does not improve our situation and should be rejected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. I was opposed to the Patriot Act in 2001 and do not believe now that it's a good idea to extend it. You know, the 4th amendment is rather clear. It says that we should be secure in our papers, our persons, our homes, and our effects. And that if warrants are to be issued, we have to do it with probable cause and describe in particular the places, the people, and the things that we are going to look at.
And I think what has happened, though, over the years has been that we have diluted the 4th Amendment. It was greatly diluted in 2,001, but started a lot earlier than that. When the FISA law was originally written in, 1978, that really introduced the notion that the 4th Amendment was relative and not absolute. And on, it was further weak in 98 and then, of course, in in 2001. I think our reaction to the horrors of, 9 11, we can understand, the concern and the fear that was developed, but I think the reaction, took us in the wrong direction because the assumption was made, of course, that we weren't spending enough money on surveillance and, even though then our intelligence agencies received $40,000,000,000 they didn't give us the right information.
So now we are spending 80,000,000,000 dollars But it also looks like, the the conclusion was that the American people had too much privacy. And if we undermine the American people's privacy somehow or another, we are going to be safer. I think the thing that has come up lately has been that the purpose of government is to make us perfectly safe. Now it is good to be safe, but governments can't make us safe. I question whether or not we have been made safer by the Patriot Act.
But let's say a law makes us somewhat safer. Is that a justification for the government to do anything they want? For instance, if you wanna be perfectly safe from, child abuse and wife beating, the government could put a camera in every one of our houses in our bedrooms and maybe there would be somebody made safer this way, but what would you be giving up? So perfect safety is not the purpose of government. What we want from government is to enforce the law and to protect protect our liberties.
This to me has been, especially since 911, a classical example of sacrificing liberty for safety and security. Now I didn't invent those terms. They've been around a long time, and it's easily justified. And I can understand it because I was here in 2001 when this came up, and, people become frightened. The American people want something done, but I I think the direct this is misdirected and and not, it doesn't serve our our benefits.
So, I I think, at this time, we should really question why we're extending this. We're extending the 3 worst parts. Why why were why were these sunsetted? Because people had concern about them. They weren't sure they were good pieces and maybe they were more successful.
And therefore, they were saying, we better reassess it. So what have we done? We have already extended it twice in here. We're going to do it again with the intent, I think, in a year to reassess this. But this bill doesn't make things worse.
It doesn't make anything better, but it does extend what others considered bad legislation. I ask for a no vote on this legislation.
@Restricted_on_X - Restricted Daily
Puff Daddy said Leonardo DiCaprio was his favorite guest at the freak-offs—never missed a party! Now Leo’s endorsing Kamala Harris. I guess Hollywood friendships have political perks! #FreakOffs #CelebrityEndorsements https://t.co/ogPfyzulUK
