TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RetsefL

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I listened to a shocking podcast by the Boston Globe about the Duke cancer scandal during Sally Kornbluth's time as Dean. She ignored serious warnings about fraud and reproducibility, including from whistleblowers and external scholars, and withheld information from a review committee. How can she still represent MIT?

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Shocking podcast by @BostonGlobe on the @DukeU cancer scandal under Sally Kornbluth tenure as Dean. She ignored multiple flashing red warning signals re fraud & reproducibility, including whistleblower and scholars from within the Duke lab, and external accomplished scholars! She was part of withholding information from a review committee allowing fraudulent clinical trials to go on! How can she continue to be the @MIT face to the world?

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Link: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/08/15/multimedia/fraudulent-cancer-breakthrough-test-future-president-mit-new-age-doubt-science/

Inside a research fraud scandal that rocked the scientific community — and tested the future president of MIT - The Boston Globe It seemed like Duke scientists had developed a “Holy Grail” of cancer treatment. Then the truth came out. In this week’s Globe Magazine cover story, reporter Mike Damiano takes readers inside the scandal that ended with broken careers, betrayed patients, and a lasting legacy of doubt in scientific institutions. bostonglobe.com
Saved - March 31, 2025 at 2:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a JAMA study on cardiac arrest incidents in US marathons and half marathons, revealing a significant rise from 2020-2023 compared to 2014-2019. The authors propose several hypotheses for this increase, but I noticed one key hypothesis is missing. Can you guess what it is?

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

JAMA study re cardiac arrest incidents in US marathons & half marathons, shows significant increase during 2020-2023 compared to 2014-2019 (0.81 vs. 0.54 per 100K participants). Authors raise several hypotheses re the reason for increase. One hypothesis is missing. Guess which? https://t.co/Jc1LZbNGcg

Saved - December 10, 2023 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
MIT President Kornbluth & Corporation face questions about their moral compass. Concerns raised about responding to antisemitic reports, advising Jewish students to use back entrances, and allowing derogatory remarks about Israelis. MIT must address these issues.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

To MIT President Kornbluth & Corporation. Your brilliant PhD student, Liyam Chitayat is asking: "When you look at the mirror, what do you see? Are you proud of your 'excellent' moral compass?" "When is the right 'context' to? Respond to antisemitic reports telling students they can try talking to the police, go to therapy or go back to where they came from.. To tell Jewish students not to come to the entrance of campus, but to go through the back door to their classes, just because they are Jewish.. Allow an MIT Chaplin advisor to repeatedly call Israelis “racist white European colonizers”, right before asking students to raise their hands in front of everybody if they eat Kosher..." As a faculty of MIT I cannot provide her any good answer, but you must! @MIT @BillAckman @RepStefanik

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether calling for the genocide of Jews violates MIT's code of conduct. They mention instances of anti-Semitic behavior on campus and criticize the university's response. They express concern about incidents of harassment and discrimination against Jewish students and staff, highlighting the fear and dehumanization they experience. The speaker emphasizes the importance of defending Jewish identity and culture, stating that they will not be erased. They assert their strength and unity, declaring "never again is now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This calling for the genocide of Jews violate MIT's code of conduct or rules regarding bullying and harassment? Yes or no? Is targeted at individuals not making a public statement. But you have heard chants for intifada on your campus. At her chance, that may or may not count as antisemitic depending on the context. What context since the executive board responded to this pathetic congressional hearing of our president, Sally Kornblut, by stating that they support Sally for her excellent moral compass. I have to ask all of you about this continuous obsession with context. I want someone to tell me when is the right context to come and urinate on the window of the prayer room of MIT Hillel in front of the Jewish praying students inside them. Tell me, when when is the right context to respond to reports of students facing bland antisemitism by telling them, well, you can try talking to the police. You can go to therapy or you can go back to where you came from. I want to know when a dozen students are allowed to storm in and harass individual staff members that work for our Jewish and are Israeli. Let me finish this. Because the list is so, so long. Because somehow there's a context in which you can tell Jewish students not to come to the entrance of MIT and to go the back door through to their classes. There are contexts where it makes sense that 70% of Jewish students at MIT do not show any sign of that they're Jewish because they're scared. There's a contest where a chaplain adviser is allowed to stop an event four times to state that Israelis European racist white colonizers right before asking Who in this room eats Kosha? On October 7th, and I said this many many times, I spent 17 hours holding my breath, talking to my friend, Keshet, who was locked in her bombshell and what she told me was how close did she hear gunshots, shout of and when terrorists invaded when terrorists invaded house of her grandparents parents. Sorry. Every single moment the when I came to MIT the day after, all I wanted was a hug. I just needed a hug because I have experienced the worst day in history we all have. But when you need context? We are so deeply dehumanized on this campus. Students go around and tear down pictures of babies' children who are currently in captivity in Hamat, Sudan, and laugh at themselves claiming this Israeli propaganda. It's Zionist propaganda. But when I look When I look at my family, I see the face of Shirk Ariel and, a mom and her 2 babies that are currently held hostage, sedated, physically, and psychologically abused. When I go in my home and I sit in my home, I think about the one 138 individuals that are missing from there. And when I look in the mirror, I see the face of Naman Levy, who was scene dragged through the streets of Gaza with blood gushing through her thighs. President Geng and President Cornbluth, when you look in the see? Tell you that the world is gonna be a great example of how we're gonna be. I'm gonna despise me. But it will not break our spirit. For 1000 of years, us Jews, how to defend our identity, our culture, and our mere existence. And we will not stop now. The entire world should know that we would not let you erase us. Not in Israel and not here. We will not look away, and we will not take the back door. We are strong. Home. We are united now and forever. Never again is now.
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 11:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A concerning study from Ontario reveals higher rates of miscarriages and induced abortions among vaccinated women. The aggregated rates are 68-76% higher for vaccinated individuals. The adjusted rate of induced abortions remains 10% higher for vaccinated women, while miscarriages show no significant increase. However, the study fails to report the coefficients of the Cox model used for adjustment, raising concerns. Moreover, the adjustment for pregnant women is biased, comparing lower-risk follow-up time post-vaccination to higher-risk follow-up time for the unvaccinated. Additionally, the adjustment for women vaccinated prior to pregnancy overlooks potential booster doses during pregnancy. These findings question the recommendation of these vaccines, especially for pregnant women.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Another red flag re mRNA-COV vaccine impact on pregnancy outcomes! Published paper using data from Ontario 'hides' major signals re increased rates of miscarriages & induced abortions among vaccinated women: 1. Aggregated rates 68-76% higher among vaccinated! 2. Authors report that 'covariate-adjusted' rate of induced abortions still 10% higher for vaccinated, but not significantly higher for miscarriages! 3. Coefficients of the Cox model used for 'adjustment' not reported (major concern)! 4. 'Reported 'Adjustment' for women who vaccinated during pregnancy is obviously biased since follow up time post vaccination in more advanced gestational weeks (lower risk) is compared to follow up time of unvaccinated during earlier gestational weeks (higher risk)! 5. 'Adjustment' for women vaccinated prior to pregnancy doesn't consider the potential booster doses some of them received during pregnancy! Hard to believe that these vaccines are still recommended to anyone and particularly pregnant women!

Saved - November 10, 2023 at 2:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jewish and Israeli MIT students faced physical obstruction from a group of pro-Hamas and anti-Israel students called the CAA. The administration's silence and failure to address the harassment have left Jewish students feeling unsafe. The CAA violated guidelines, obstructed classes, and even called for violence. MIT's response, including warnings and lack of consequences, has further marginalized Jewish students. On the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht, Jews at MIT were advised to enter through back entrances, reflecting a disturbing repetition of history.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

This is the reality that MIT President wants to hide. A letter from Israeli & Jewish MIT students: To all students at MIT, Today, Jewish and Israeli MIT students were physically prevented from attending class by a hostile group of pro-Hamas and anti-Israel MIT students that call themselves the CAA. This is after students from the CAA harassed MIT staff members in their offices for being Jewish and interrupted classes in the past few weeks. All of this has occurred with no clear response from the administration. With each passing day, MIT admin’s silence makes Jewish and Israeli students feel unsafe at MIT. Many Jewish students fear leaving their dorm rooms and have stated that they feel MIT is not safe for Jews. This message is compounded by the public and private warnings of Hillel and many faculty that Jewish students should not enter MIT’s main lobby today, November 9th, 2023. Instead of dispersing the mob or de-escalating the situation by rerouting all students from Lobby 7, Jewish students specifically were warned not to enter MIT’s front entrance due to a risk to their physical safety. The onus to protect Jewish students should not be on the students themselves. MIT administration recently announced guidelines to avoid illegal and unsafe protests on campus. The CAA, which planned the protest, knowingly and proudly violated these requirements, and even invited people from outside of MIT to join them. Their actions inhibit the possibility of safe and peaceful dialogue and endanger Jewish students on campus. The CAA hosted a blockade that not only disregards MIT guidelines, but also obstructs Jewish students from attending classes. Some Jewish students who saw the administration’s failure to respond to the targeted harassment of Jews on campus by the CAA came together to support each other and peacefully together stand against this threat to their safety. Four hours after the blockade started, at 12 pm, the MIT administration passed a letter to all students, threatening their suspension if the crowds did not disperse from Lobby 7. Only the Jewish students left immediately. The CAA protesters did not cooperate. Indeed, the CAA proceeded to invite more students and non-MIT protestors to join them in calling for a violent uprising (“Intifada”) and justifying the terror attacks of Hamas on Israeli civilians. At 5 pm, all students on campus were warned through MIT’s emergency notification system to “avoid Lobby 7” –– officially recognizing the danger present to students as a result of this violent protest. No Jewish or Israeli students were present at this point. As of 10:30 tonight MIT has officially decided not to academically suspend CAA students who repeatedly violated the administration's guidelines and threats. They have shown that actions against Jews at MIT do not have consequences. Additionally, in an email to DUSP students, the Department Head indicated that he would protect any DUSP students involved in violating MIT’s rules today by protesting with the CAA. Not only do Jewish students feel unsafe on campus, but now they also feel excluded from and unsafe in DUSP. Today, on the 9th of November, on the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht, which marked the beginning of the Holocaust, Jews at MIT were told to enter campus from back entrances and not to stay in Hillel for fear of their physical safety. We are seeing history repeating itself and Jews on MIT’s campus are afraid. Signed, The MIT Israel Alliance and its supporters

Saved - October 16, 2023 at 8:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel made strategic mistakes by underestimating Hamas and allowing them to build military capabilities near its villages. The belief that Hamas was deterred and focused on improving Gaza's welfare was a failed paradigm. The reliance on a physical and technology-based barrier proved ineffective as Hamas executed a well-planned attack, destroying IDF infrastructure. While Hamas received help from Iran, there is no evidence of infiltration into IDF or the Israeli government. This failure is part of Iran's strategy to harm Israel and weaken Western civilization. The war against Hamas is not solely about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but a broader Jihad war against freedom and humanity.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

As the facts start to surface, it becomes clear: 1. Israel government and military made strategic mistake over several years to believe that Hamas can be reasoned with and may abandon its Jihad doctrine. It allowed Hamas to build major military capabilities less than 20 minutes from its villages. 2. Israel intelligence and government fell into the failed paradigm that Hamas is deterred and interested mostly in improving the economics and welfare of Gaza. All intelligence signals received were fed into this failed paradigm. 3. Operationally, IDF became more and more ‘digital’ over the years, and heavily relied on the physical and technology-based Barrier on the Gaza border. The belief was that it cannot be penetrated, definitely not by a massive number of people at once. Focus was mostly on underground tunnels. 4. It is reasonable to assume (yet to be verified) that Israel did not have a plan to how to manage a scenario, in which the Barrier failed and so many towns and villages, as well as military assets in the area are already compromised. 5. Hamas designed and executed a meticulously creative and determined attack plan that deceived Israel intelligence (see 1 & 2 above) and dismantled and destroyed the Barrier, the respective sensors and the local command and control of IDF. 6. Tactically, on the evening before the attack, intelligence signals were detected but were likely fed into the failed paradigm (1 & 2) above. On the day of the attack, IDF forces in the Gaza border were not sufficient in numbers against the over 2000 well trained Hamas commando who attacked them by surprise. Most of the IDF forces along the boarder as well as the command & control infrastructure were destroyed in the first 2 hours. 7. In spite of the surprise and intelligence blackout as a results of the lost of the sensors and command and control, IDF and Shabac forces arrived to the Gaza border as early as a few hours after the attack started but they had to face larger number of Hamas commando who prepared ambushes. This partially explains why it took so many hours to rescue the the civilians in the villages. This is a devastating failure with multiple layers. There is a lot more to investigate. However, while it is certain that Hamas received major help from Iran, and it is even possible that he had some local ‘spies’ or helpers (potentially, Palestinians who work in Israel), there is absolutely zero evidence of infiltration into IDF or Israel government. Zero! System failures of this magnitude always generate retrospectively a sentiment of disbelief, which partly explains how they occurred in the first place… The idea that an entity, let alone an Israeli one, other than Iran and its allies, wanted this type of operations and actively enabled it, is not only not supported by any real fact, but also is not plausible or even really feasible. Moreover, this type of attack is an integral part of the known and declared strategy of Iran, to use its allies on the borders of Israel to harm Israel and weaken it! Finally, the war against Hamas has a much broader context than Israel. It is not even primarily related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Iran and Hamas don’t care about the Palestinians. It is part of a Jihad war, unilaterally declared by radical Islamic forces led by Iran, not only against Israel but against the US, and western civilization, including the many moderate Muslims! It is a war anyone seeking for freedom, lives and humanity should support!

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 8:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A test reveals heart inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Comparing asymptomatic vaccinated to non-vaccinated shows significant differences. Impact weakens with time from vaccination, but strengthens the causal link. Stay informed about potential health implications.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Test provides indication of heart inflammation and more generally cardiovascular risk. The striking thing is that they compared tests of asymptomatic vaccinated to non vaccinated and saw significant differences. Impact decrease as you get further from vaccination which strengthen the causal relationship!

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 1:52 AM

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

More disturbing findings published on mRNA vaccines harms to : PET/CT scans of asymptomatic vacc’s (700) < 180 d’s post vax showed increased myocardial F-FDG uptake compared to non vacc’s (303). Known to correlate with inflammation! In 16 pt’s uptake increased post vacc’s!

Saved - September 30, 2023 at 3:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine was administered to billions without proper clinical trials, violating regulatory measures. The Cutter incident serves as a cautionary tale, where poorly manufactured polio vaccines harmed thousands of children. Dr. Paul Offit's analysis sheds light on this incident. The MHRA's failure to test the safety of mass-manufactured COVID vaccine batches is concerning. For more information, refer to the provided links.

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

By any acceptable regulatory measure, on Dec 20, the Pfizer vaccine was given to billions without due clinical trials! It’s mandatory to test the commercial manufacturing process! In the Cutter incident (‘55) badly manufactured polio vaccine harmed many thousands of children! Dr. Paul Offit’s analysis of the Cutter Incident is below! Thanks @JosephFraiman for pointing me to the Cutter Incident! @DrPaulOffit

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Links: https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/28/mhra-finally-admits-it-failed-to-test-the-safety-of-mass-manufactured-covid-vaccine-batches/ https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-2 https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/book-club/review-cutter-incident-paul-offit

MHRA Finally Admits it Failed to Test the Safety of Mass Manufactured Covid Vaccine Batches – The Daily Sceptic In a new FOI release the MHRA has finally come clean that it failed to test the safety of mass manufactured Covid vaccine batches, in contravention of its own regulations and public statements. dailysceptic.org
Effect of mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing Processes on Efficacy and Safety Still an Open Question bmj.com
Review: The Cutter Incident by Paul Offit Offit’s sobering inquiry into “one of the worst biological disasters in American history” is a work of unflinching investigative journalism which lands, finally, not as a whodunit, but as a tribute to modern systems of meticulous vaccine regulation. gavi.org
Saved - September 5, 2023 at 5:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
CDC recommends COVID vaccines for children 6-48 months. Concerns arise over adverse effects: 6 severe cases vs 2 in Pfizer trial, 23 vs 11 for other infections. Worries about weakened immune response and cardiovascular risks. Burden of proof shifts to not proving safety and efficacy. #VaccinationDebate

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

CDC continues to recommend COV vacc’s for children 6-48 mo. How many red flags needed to stop? More harm in vacc’s vs. placebo in Pfizer trial, 6 vs. 2 severe COV & 23 vs. 11 other severe viral infections! Concerns of prolonged reduced immune response to viruses & bacteria! Not to mention risk of cardiovascular injury, for which Pfizer holds back its trial results! Seems like the burden of proof of safe & effective changed to the burden of proof of not-safe & not-effective… @StabellBenn @TracyBethHoeg @DrJBhattacharya @JosephFraiman @MaryanneDemasi

Saved - August 18, 2023 at 1:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A study in Science Immunology reveals concerning findings for the mRNA nanolipids platform. Vaccine-induced myocarditis appears to be driven by the platform itself, not just the spike protein. This suggests future mRNA-based vaccines and drugs may carry similar risks. The study also highlights sustained heart scarring and abnormalities, emphasizing that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not mild. #Science #Immunology #VaccineSafety

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Excellent Science Immunology study is very bad news to the mRNA/nanolipids platform! Showing that vaccine-induced myocarditis is likely driven by the platform & not antigen specific (i.e., spike protein)! Implying that future mRNA-based vaccines/drugs would have same risk! Also providing another evidence of sustained heart scarring and abnormalities! Vaccine-induced myocarditis is NOT mild! @BretWeinstein @DrAseemMalhotra @P_McCulloughMD

Saved - August 17, 2023 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New study reveals mRNA COV vax's downside: boosters trigger igG4 antibodies, increasing severe illness & autoimmune risks. Post-vax infection worse, but pre-vax infection lessens impact. Check out the details: nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40103-x#Abs1

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

Very bad news for the mRNA COV vax! Published study shows boosted individuals exhibit significant subclass switch to igG4 antibodies, causing increased risk of severe illness & autoimmune diseases! COV infection post booster is worst! Pre-vaccination infection limits impact! This vaccine is not as bad if you were infected before….’good product’… https://nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40103-x#Abs1…

View Full Interactive Feed