TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Rickster_75
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Listen very carefully what George Bush says. Listen x 100. #Remembering911 🇺🇸 #WeWillNeverForget 🇺🇸 https://t.co/TGJrrHBbFQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The nation paused to mark the 5th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. According to the speaker, the CIA obtained valuable information by questioning men like Kalayk Sheikh Mohammed, which helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States. Kalayk Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks on buildings inside the US and how operatives were directed to carry them out. He said the operatives were instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high point to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nation paused to mark the 5th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Kalayk Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States. For example, Kalayk Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks on buildings inside the US and how operatives, were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who had the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives have been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
He told us the operatives have been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. The explosives
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Joe Biden didn't want Black children in White schools, but according to the left, Biden is not racist. https://t.co/0S0u7OX4w9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the issue of busing is not about north versus south but rural versus urban. They believe that busing in urban areas does not make sense due to integrated facilities but segregated neighborhoods. They predict that young black leaders will support their stance and that pushing busing will set back the civil rights movement. The speaker emphasizes that only federal courts can determine constitutional violations in school desegregation cases and that specific intent to segregate must be proven before busing can be ordered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We keep talking about this thing as being north versus south. That's not the issue. It is rural versus urban, and most of the busing that's taking place to date is taking place in rural areas, whether be administratively ordered or court ordered. Now we're moving into applying the same standards to urban areas, and it is a standard that doesn't make sense. It doesn't apply.
It doesn't hold. We're moving from trying to in this in in in urban areas, we've had integrated facilities, but segregated neighborhoods. And in rural areas, we've traditionally had integrated neighborhoods but segregated facilities. And they've applied the same standard and the same test. So this north south thing is not really the issue as professor Nathan Glaser at Harvard has indicated, as doctor, Armour of the Rand Corporation, as James Coleman, as I just tell 3 days of hearing 22 days of hearing in judiciary committee on another bill I have beyond this that deals with busing.
And there is uniform opinion of those who testified that it is not a north south, it's an urban rural question, a distinction. But no matter what your intent, there are going to be those who say it's a it's a segregated thing. It's a it's a question of of race and that you have set back the movement of desegregation of schools. How would you answer that? The way I answer that is I predict that the young black leadership of America will overwhelmingly decide with me.
I predict that in 1980 84, my position will be totally vindicated by the sociologist and by the civil rights after you know, I come from that side of the track. That's where I'm from. I was a defense lawyer. I handle civil rights cases. I sat in on route 40.
I mean, I you know, I'm not I'm not from the other side of this, and I happen to think that the one way to ensure that you set the civil rights movement in America further back is to continue to push busing because it's a bankrupt policy. And that's that's that's that's why I think I'll be vindicated. I don't I don't include myself with pro or anti busing force. I think the only group that can determine whether or not constitutional violation existed, the federal courts of the United States of America. No one else has that right.
Secondly, a federal court of the United States of America determining a violation of the constitution with regard to school desegregation cases must find that there is a specific intent to segregate before they can order bussing. That I abide by, that I legislate by, that I hold by, and they're they're the standards we should repair to. It's difficult to establish intent, but it's clearly possible. Factually, it can be established. The court has the Supreme Court 8 to 0, 8 to 0, ruled yesterday that they must find that.
And you very well know as covering this area as long as you have that there is there are legal standards by which you bring in burdens of proof to establish whether or not there was a specific intent.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Rep. Chip Roy states the US Govt and Fauci lied about vaccine efficacy and forced mandates, affecting 2/3 of US workers. Over 1 Million injuries reported to the government. https://t.co/F1cJb9FXQy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated for their jobs under federal mandates, which covered two-thirds of American workers. Claims of vaccine effectiveness were exaggerated, leading to a bait-and-switch situation. Despite promises of safety and freedom, over 1 million adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines have been reported, with only 11 compensated cases, while Big Pharma remains immune to liability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over a 100,000,000 Americans were forced to take a vaccine with a veiled threat, your job or the jab. Regardless of what radical progressive Democrats wanna claim, these vaccines were not voluntary. The federal government mandated vaccines for military personnel, health care workers, government contractors, and all businesses with more than a 100 workers. The Biden administration bragged that their mandates covered more than 2 thirds of American workers. The government lied about its efficacy and effectiveness to make these mandates more palatable.
Doctor Fauci said it is as simple as black and white. You're vaccinated. You're safe. You're unvaccinated. You're at risk.
Simple as that. Not sure the truth has borne that out. Former CDC director, Rochelle Walensky said the following, our data from the CDC today suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. They teased the prospect of freedom if we would just suck it up and do what they said. How did that work out?
They were dead wrong and instead we got one of the biggest bait and switches of all time. We decided to inject 700,000,000 people with vaccines regardless of the risk COVID 19 poses to them. Here's the aftermath. A 1,000,000 adverse events from the COVID 19 countermeasures have have been reported to the government, only 11 have been compensated, while Big Pharma enjoys complete immunity from liability stemming from COVID 19 vaccine injury.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, gives testimony for the record Detailing ALL 3 Three phone calls he had with Nancy Pelosi on Jan 6th. His testimony directly contradicts Nancy Pelosi’s statements That She did not speak with Capitol Police the Chief on January 6th. #January6th #NancyPelosi
Video Transcript AI Summary
After leaving a location, I had three calls with Speaker Pelosi about getting people back into chambers. Speaker Pelosi's claim of not speaking with me is inaccurate. I cannot comment on whether Capitol security was politicized. I wish Speaker Pelosi had considered the challenges I faced before calling for my resignation. Former Sergeant at Arms believed we were prepared for a typical demonstration, not for the events that unfolded. We did not anticipate a member of Congress inciting the crowd.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the Senate to go brief the Senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me his cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my second call with Speaker Pelosi, questioning the information I'd given to, Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7 p.
M, and the call ended. That was call number 2. Call number 3 was 6:25 p. M. I was over at the Senate from the secure location I mean, from where the Senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Caram's cell phone, They dialed leadership, who was over or off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers.
That would have been call number 3 with Speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: So you didn't have one call. You didn't have 2 call. You had 3 calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to are inaccurate.
Speaker 0: That is correct, sir.
Speaker 1: Let me let me shift gears and go back, as it relates to the optics of bringing people up to Capitol Hill and and running things up the chain of command ultimately to the speaker's office. Do you think speaker Pelosi's office, or speaker Pelosi herself, politicized capital security?
Speaker 0: I I have no I have no idea on that, sir.
Speaker 1: Okay. Any other clarifications you'd like to make as it relates to Speaker Pelosi's comments that you didn't speak to her?
Speaker 0: I just, you know, wish she had considered that, wish she had considered some of the stuff that I've faced and the efforts I went through, to bring in the outside resources, on that day before she called for her resignation.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, for being here. I yield back. Gentlemen, yields, now begin our second round of question. I'll yield 5 minutes to the gentlelady from California, Ms. Torres.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Chairman. Mr. Sun, I have here a statement, from it's testimony from, Paul Irving, the former sergeant at arms, and this is a testimony he gave to the senate, at a hearing. And he states on January 5th, Chief Sund and I participated in a web based interagency conference call with multiple law enforcement partners, the FBI, the MPD, the US Secret Service, the US Park Police, and the Military District of Washington, among other law enforcement agencies from the National Capital Region. Based on the intelligence and threat assessment, everyone on the call believe that we were prepared and the plant met the threat.
So you were prepared for what you thought would be a typical, demonstration, a First Amendment demonstration on Capitol Hill, such as the women's march when we all wore our pink hats and came out and marched, against some of the efforts, of the president. What you did not anticipate none of you anticipated that a Republican member of congress would tell the crowd on stage, today is the day. American patriots start talk taking down names and kicking ass, and our ancestors sacrificed their blood, their sweat, their tears, their fortunes, and sometimes their lives. Are you willing to do the same? You didn't anticipate that, did you?
Speaker 0: We we anticipated some minor skirmishes. We did not anticipate
Speaker 2: But you didn't anticipate a member, a Republican member of Congress, to go on stage and incite the crowd like this.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Listen to this old clip of Obama talking about immigration in 2009. Today he would be considered racist and a xenophobe by the left. https://t.co/tNbeCAn5c1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Obama in 2009 discussed immigration, emphasizing it wouldn't be easy, requiring fines, English learning, and waiting in line for citizenship. He stressed the need for control to prevent illegal border crossings. The speaker contrasts this with the current situation, where anyone can enter the country, suggesting a return to Obama's approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's a clip of Obama talking about immigration in 2009, and it's insane.
Speaker 1: This is not gonna be a free ride. It's not gonna be some instant amnesty. What's gonna happen is you are gonna pay a significant fine. You are going to learn English. You are gonna go to the back of the line so that you don't get ahead of somebody who is in Mexico City applying legally.
But after you've done these things over a certain period of time, you can earn your citizenship. I think the American people, they appreciate and believe in immigration, but they can't have a situation where you just have half a 1000000 people pouring over the border without any kind of mechanism to control it.
Speaker 0: That was said in 2009. If you said that now, you'd be called a racist and a xenophobe, and look at the state of our southern border. Anybody and their brother, mother, and sister can come into this country. We should go back and listen to old school Obama.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
This was filmed at the border in Arizona. All men from the Middle East. Military-age. Fit. Well fed. No family. A man fleeing war takes his family. A man going to war leaves them. https://t.co/LtZL6PBLAb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks where the person is from, and they respond that they are from Egypt. The speaker is surprised and repeats "Egypt" multiple times. They ask if the person is going to New York or Chicago, and the person responds that they are going to Boston. The speaker confirms that they are from Egypt and asks how many days they have been there. The person says they arrived today. The speaker thanks them and comments that they are alone without family. The speaker asks if they have a wife or kids, and the person says no. The speaker finds it crazy and describes the place as guerrilla camps, the frontline of an invasion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where are you from? Egypt. Egypt. Holy cow. Don't listen to him.
Egypt. Egypt. Egypt. Okay. Where in America?
New Yorker. New oh, Cairo. Are you going to New York or Chicago? Boston? Boston.
Okay. Egypt? Yes. Okay. Far How many days?
Today? Today. Today. You got here today. Alright.
Well, thank you. All men, though. Not family no wives? Kids? No.
All by yourself. 1 wife? Wife? No kids? What do you think, man?
Crazy. Yeah. This is, this is guerrilla camps. I mean, really, what it comes down to. You know?
Yeah. I mean, there's no other word for it. I mean, they have live ins. They have yurts, Permanent establishments. These are gorilla camps.
Yeah. This this is it's a, you know, the the frontline of the invasion.
reSee.it AI Summary
The lack of records surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death raises questions about the official narrative. Mark Epstein's struggle to obtain basic documents, like the prehospital care report, adds to the mystery.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Tucker Carlson: The U.S. government claims Jeffrey Epstein killed himself in a federal detention facility in Manhattan four and a half years ago, just before his trial. If that’s true, why are there so few records available from that night? Here’s Mark Epstein trying to get a copy of one of the most basic documents of all, the prehospital care report, written by the EMS team that moved his brother’s body out of the cell.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is discussing the search for a PCR report from August 10, 2019, but it cannot be found in the fire department database. They speculate that the person may have been taken directly to the morgue. The speaker mentions having photographs of the person in the hospital. They discuss the possibility of the fire department personnel taking the person somewhere else, but the computer system does not have any record of it. The speaker acknowledges that the information they received from the fire department differs from what the computer system shows. They express confusion about why the record is missing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lower man lower Manhattan.
Speaker 1: Okay. But as of right now, you're telling me you can't find their PCR report?
Speaker 0: Not for the 10th August 2019. No. Not in it's not in the fire department database. I don't know why. If it's supposed to be there, we'll find out.
But first, you Got to get the letters of administration before you can take them anywhere.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Is it because the date on here is the 10th or 19th. That's the day they found him, they took him, and they he's dead.
Speaker 0: Well, then they might have taken him directly to the morgue.
Speaker 1: No. He was in the I have photographs of him in the hospital too.
Speaker 0: Oh, well, I'm, you you didn't tell me that.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm
Speaker 0: just Go on, Bob.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. No. I understand. I'm just trying to explain what I know.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I don't know what happened, but, So far, he's not in the fire department database. I don't know why.
Speaker 1: But they had a private unit at the scene.
Speaker 0: And, could they have taken them somewhere? Well, Shahina Hicks has a photograph of the fire department personnel.
Speaker 1: That doesn't that doesn't generate documentation? Yeah. This is the photograph. Yeah. But what did he say I couldn't hear?
Speaker 0: He said that because you see the fire department just because you see the fire department My personnel there, that doesn't mean they provided documentation.
Speaker 1: They told me they did. I spoke to them. Yeah. And they were the ones who suggested I get the PCR report.
Speaker 0: Well well, they're saying one thing, but The computer is saying something else.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, since I heard that with my own ears, I believe them, and I don't know why someone played with the computer and it's not there.
Speaker 0: I'm just sent telling you the situation. I'm not saying either way. I'm just saying the computer is saying one thing, and the information you got for them is different.
Speaker 1: Right. So the but the computer say what the computer is saying is that it doesn't have a record of this.
Speaker 0: That's That's what I'm trying to tell you. Yes. Yeah. And I don't know why.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
G. Edward Griffin explains the difference between a direct democracy and a constitutional republic. The USA is a constitutional republic!🇺🇸 https://t.co/ZfjNvNaPrZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A form of government is based on majority rule, but it can be dangerous. For instance, a lynch mob is an example of majority rule, where only one person disagrees and is silenced. This is pure democracy. However, a republic is different. It is a limited democracy that protects the rights of the minority. In a republic, a set of rules called the constitution is written to ensure that everyone follows them, regardless of temptation. This creates a constitutional republic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is a form of government based upon the principle of majority rule, period. End of discussion. Now that's not very complicated. Majority rule. It's easy to understand, easy to sell to the masses, and I might add, Deadly.
For example, what would you call a lynch mob? That's majority rule. There's only 1 descending vote and he's at the end of the rope. Now that's pure democracy in action. Of the, wait a minute, you say.
The majority should rule, yes, but not to the extent of destroying the rights of the minority. And now, ladies and gentlemen, we are no longer describing a democracy. We are speaking of a republic. A republic is a limited democracy. It's a form of government based upon the principle of limited majority rule.
Limited so that the minority, even a minority of 1, can be protected against the whims and passions of the majority. And how do you protect the minority from the majority? You write down a set of rules on a piece of paper. You say, this we can do. That we cannot.
At the top of the paper, you write the word constitution, and then everyone agrees to follow the rules no matter what the temptation. And when you're finished, you've created a constitutional republic.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
J6 SetUp To Bring Trump & MAGA Down‼️ Phone video of a dc officer on January the 6th saying “ we go undercover as antifa in the crowd” https://t.co/ma44stwTBR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 thanks Joe for covering the antiques in the crowd. They ask if it feels better and offer to spray something.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeez. When we go under, it covers the antiques in the crowd, Joe. Can you put that back in? Alright. Thank you so much.
Yep. It feels better? You guys get sprayed. Here. Here.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
This guy trashes Hamas/Palestine supporters… Israel haters. https://t.co/4mpnC3ZiZ0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Supporters of Palestine are criticized for not taking action beyond online activism. The speaker questions their sincerity, suggesting that they enjoy the violence and death associated with the conflict. In contrast, the speaker highlights the commitment of Israelis who have traveled to fight on the front lines, including parents with children. The speaker challenges the online supporters to take real action rather than just cheering from afar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anybody that today supports Palestine is an absolute ignorant person, and I'll tell you why. You could scream all you want, free Palestine, help Palestine, and say all you want all around the world. But I don't see any of you guys out there taking a flight and going to Palestine to Gaza to stand with Hamas on the front line and fighting for Palestine. So everything you're doing is just because you wanna make noise and you like hate and you like to see people die just like in the Colosseum in Rome years ago. Right?
So people could watch other people being killed, and they would cheer for it. People are evil, and we're trying to make this world a better place, but none of them actually go to Palestine to fight. I wanna see you go fight. On the other hand, Israeli, 300,000 of them vacation or not vacation. Boom.
They flew to Israel and started fighting on the front line. People with 3 kids, 4 kids, 2 kids, fathers, they went to fight. What What are you guys doing? Cheering on online? Oh, free Palestine, like that's gonna
reSee.it AI Summary
From 1937 to 2020, Israel offered peace treaties and made painful concessions to its neighbors. However, all attempts were rejected. The truth is, they don't seek peace or coexistence. Their goal is to eliminate Israel. They claim freedom and independence, but their actions speak otherwise. #GodBlessIsrael
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
What do the following years have in common? 1937, 1947, 1967, 1991, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2013, 2019, 2020. The years Israel accepted a peace treaty with its neighbors and offered concessions, painful concessions for peace. And the Arabs rejected all the peace treaties with Israel because they don’t want peace with Israel. They want Israel not to exist. “But… but… They want peace! They want a state. They want freedom. They want independence.”🖕🏻 #GodBlessIsrael ✡️🇮🇱
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Canada: "When we become the majority, you will have no choice but to accept sharia law," promises this Muslim in Canada. Trudeau destroyed his country like Merkel in Germany. We need to stop this from ever happening in the U.S. #FkIslam #FkShariawLaw #AmericaFirst ✝️🇺🇸🦅 https://t.co/SUU33FRz43
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the issue of having a Muslim majority in Canada and the conflict between Canadian law and Sharia law. They question the respectfulness of wanting to replace Canadian law with Sharia law and suggest that if Muslims were the majority, there would be no other option. They also mention the idea of changing the laws to prevent more Muslims from coming to Canada and express their loyalty to their religion over the queen. Speaker 0 shares their personal experience of remaining silent during the oath, implying that it was the responsibility of others to ensure they complied.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We can have a Muslim majority nation here in Canada right in your face. Hey. We have Canadian law here, and you say that you want Sharia law to displace Canadian law. That doesn't sound very respectful. Majority, you wouldn't have any other option.
Go to your queen and tell to Change the laws to what, sir? To Sharia law? No. Change the laws to to not allow any more Muslims to come to Canada. We owe our allegiance and our loyalty first and foremost to our religion, not to the queen, to be honest.
When I went for my, the so called oath. I was silent. I didn't say anything. It was your responsibility to make sure you got it out of you.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Gaza facts. Palestine facts.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gaza was previously under Israeli IDF control but was given up in 2005 for peace. However, it has now become a hub for terrorists, particularly Hamas. Despite receiving significant financial aid from the West, no new hospitals or schools have been built in the past five years. On the other hand, over the last two years, more than 30 terror tunnels have been discovered. It is worth noting that Hamas exploits children for their own purposes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just facts about Gaza. Used to be under Israeli IDF control. They gave it up in pursuit of peace in 2005. It's now become a hot tub for terrorists in Hamas. Hundreds of millions a year from the West go to Hamas, yet 0 hospitals and 0 new schools have been built in the last 5 years, yet over 30 terror tunnels have been found in the last 2 years.
They are controlled by Hamas. Hamas does use children as human fields.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
The difference between liberals and a conservatives.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Conservatives and liberals have different approaches to various issues. Conservatives choose not to buy guns if they don't like them, while liberals aim to outlaw all guns. Similarly, conservatives who are vegetarians simply avoid eating meat, whereas liberals want to ban meat products for everyone. When it comes to talk show hosts, conservatives switch channels if they dislike them, while liberals demand that those they dislike be shut down. Conservative non-believers don't go to church, while liberal non-believers want any mention of God and Jesus silenced. Conservatives may shop for healthcare or choose a job that provides it, while liberals expect others to pay for theirs. Lastly, conservatives share this video for a laugh, while liberals have already moved on and may report it for hate speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doing conservatives and liberals. If a conservative doesn't like guns, they don't buy 1.
Speaker 1: But if a liberal doesn't like guns, They want all guns outlawed.
Speaker 0: If a conservative is a vegetarian, they don't eat meat.
Speaker 1: But if a liberal is a vegetarian, They want all meat products banned for everyone.
Speaker 0: If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, they switch channels.
Speaker 1: Liberalss demand that those they don't like be shut down or canceled.
Speaker 0: If a conservative is a non believer, they don't go to church.
Speaker 1: A liberal non believer wants any mention of god and Jesus silenced.
Speaker 0: If a conservative decides they need health care, fader about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
Speaker 1: A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for theirs.
Speaker 0: If a conservative sees this, they'll forward it so their friends can have a good laugh.
Speaker 1: A liberal has already swiped up.
Speaker 0: But first, they reported this video for hate speech or something.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
TRUTH!!!
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Obama bombed Libya and toppled its government, creating a hotbed of chaos, terrorism, and human slavery. The Obama administration revived human slavery in Libya. But the corporate media doesn't talk about this.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United Nations reports that African migrants passing through Libya are being sold as slaves by traffickers and militia groups. These migrants are held for ransom after being bought and sold in garages and car parks in Sabah, a major smuggling hub in Libya. The head of the UN agency's Libya mission shared this information at a news conference in Geneva. The situation is alarming, with migrants being sold for prices ranging from $2 to $500. Limited military action has been taken in Libya.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United Nations says growing numbers of African migrants passing through Libya are being sold as slaves by traffickers or militia groups before being held for ransom. The UN's migration agency interviewed West African migrants who told of being bought and sold in garages and car parks in the southern city of Sabah, one of Libya's main migrant smuggling hubs. The head of the UN agency's Libya mission gave more details at a news conference in Geneva. If you go to the market and you can pay between $2 and $500 to get a migrant. Limited military action in Libya.
We came, we saw, he died.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Joe Biden made an number of blunders in his speech. He claimed that “America first” policies weakened America. He misidentified the Prime Minister of Japan as the President of Japan. He forgot to unplug his earpiece and walked away without shaking hands with anyone else.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The press conference ends and the leaders leave. Please remain seated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. This concludes our press conference. Please please stay seated as the the leaders depart, please. Please stay seated.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Black Americans are finally realizing that they have been used and abused by the DemocRat Party just for their vote.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a resident of Baltimore, believes that African Americans should support Trump despite the false narrative that he is racist. They argue that his policies are important for the community and highlight his support for historically black colleges, the Second Chance Act, and low unemployment rates. The speaker urges African Americans to focus on policy rather than personality, claiming that the Democratic Party offers nothing but destruction for their community. They acknowledge that many people dislike Trump but emphasize the need to consider his policies instead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think his policies are very important to African Americans. I'm from a predominantly, African American city, Baltimore. But a lot of us as African Americans don't understand that we need to vote for Trump. We we the narrative that he's a racist is a false narrative. We know it's a false narrative.
Of course, he wasn't called a racist until he started running all support any. He was hanging out with every rapper, you know, in the city, you know. So how can it be a real It's video proof. Up until one point and then all of a sudden, the race is, all of a sudden. But his policy is not very for personality.
We need to vote for policy. His policy are for everybody. And he's done so many things for African Americans. It's the 2nd chance act, low unemployment rate and it's given to, the historic black colleges. So we need to keep those policies and push forward Forward depository.
Can keep that momentum and not vote different when they come up. The Democrats have nothing for us but death on their platform, and most of their platforms do nothing but, destroy the African American community. We know that. We say we wanna change, but we are afraid to make the change because of his personality. I get it.
A lot of people don't like him. Forget about his personality. Think about his policy.
@Rickster_75 - 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️
Peter Nygard & partner speaks candidly about ‘black women’ body parts & DNA. The same fashion mogul pedophile that’s been arrested for trafficking, owns an island by Epstein & Richard Branson. “If you have an abortion, that’s very VALUABLE!” -Peter Nygard
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a stem cell technology called SDNT, which involves using the eggs of young women and replacing the nucleus with their own DNA. They emphasize the genetic superiority of curvy, sexy black women from Africa and express a desire to obtain some of their genetic traits. The speaker offers to pay women $100 for their hair and asks about the price for umbilical cords, placentas, and period blood, which they claim are rich in stem cells. They suggest that these waste products should be captured and recycled instead of going to waste.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The stem cell technology that Peter I invested in is called SDNT, which takes the eggs of a young, perfect, woman specimen, takes the egg and takes out the nucleus and puts our DNA in the nucleus It is going to take out. Excellent. This is part of this genetic greatness that we don't see in any other race on the planet. These curvy, sexy black women from Africa. We both have a kind of monopoly on this genetic protection.
And we want some of that. So girls, for $100, we will pay you for your haircut. I pay you. And that is the honor? You want it.
So how much do you want for umbilical cord and a placenta. In your period blood is so rich with stem cells. We know we've got it as waste that is actually should be. It should be captured as recycled. And it should go to waste.
@Rickster_75 - ⚔️🇺🇸Sir Rickster🇺🇸⚔️
“What is going on in Washington, DC?! This is outrageous. We have a U.S. Senator on the floor of the Senate saying there is a foreign national with recordings of then Vice President Joe Biden asking for bribes…” Ric Grenell then puts the corrupt media on blast
Video Transcript AI Summary
A US senator claims that there are recordings of Joe Biden asking for bribes, which the FBI possesses but has not acted upon. The speaker criticizes the media for not pressuring Biden and his son, Hunter, for their alleged corruption. They argue that the lack of media pushback resembles a regime-style media. The speaker questions the absence of fact-checkers from the Washington Post and reports from the New York Times, specifically mentioning journalist Maggie Haberman.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Going on in Washington DC. This is outrageous. We have a US senator on the floor of the senate saying there is a foreign national with recordings of then vice president Joe Biden asking for bribes. Think about that. There are recordings that the FBI of the United States has.
They have not taken action on it. They have not come forward. They tried to hide it from Republicans. This is total corruption, Jordan. But the reason why the Biden team gets away with this.
The reason why Joe Biden and Hunter Biden keep getting away with breaking the law and being corrupt is because the media does not pressure them. There is no pushback from the media. But we're at the point that when the unite when the media in Washington DC doesn't push back on both parties, in DC doesn't push back on both parties, it really is like a regime style media. Yeah. Types of things we call out in other this is insane.
This is the president of the United States. I, you know, where is the Washington Post fact checkers? Where are the New York Times reports? Maggie Haberman, are you there? Are you there?
@Rickster_75 - ⚔️🇺🇸Sir Rickster🇺🇸⚔️
What Do You Think of McCarthy Now Follow @Rickster_75