TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RickyDoggin
reSee.it AI Summary
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US-made Stinger missiles the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary Clinton brokered the Libya deal with Stevens and Marc Turi; some missiles ended up in Afghanistan and were used against our forces, including a July 25, 2012 Chinook downing. The CIA cache in Qatar linked to the State Dept’s illicit arms deal; Bergdahl traded to cover it; Obama blamed a video.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Derek Chauvin was stabbed 22 times by a former FBI informant and Mexican Mafia member, who says he did it in solidarity with BLM. His race is listed as white in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The journalist who spoke with Chauvin and produced "The Fall of Minneapolis", Liz Collin, joins Primetime.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shocking new details emerged about the attempted murder of Derek Chauvin, America’s most high-profile inmate. Last Friday, Chauvin was stabbed 22 times in the library by another inmate. The assailant has been identified as John Turcak, 52, who has already served 27 years of a 30-year sentence and is described as a member of the Mexican mafia and, allegedly, an FBI informant. The complaint states Turcak initially denied wanting to kill Chauvin, and then the Mexican mafia member waived his Miranda rights when an FBI agent arrived to interview him. The FBI’s involvement raises questions, as the agency typically participates in prison murders when there is an order, if the perpetrator or victim is still informing, or in both scenarios. The complaint claims Turcak confessed to wanting to murder Chauvin on Black Friday to symbolically avenge Black Lives Matter.
The discussion challenges the plausibility of a Mexican mafia member, who has historically preyed on Black inmates and operated within prison racial groupings, acting as a social-justice warrior to avenge Black Lives Matter. The transcript notes Turcak is listed as white and of Croatian origin, which raises questions about his supposed diversity within the Mexican mafia. It also notes Turcak’s sudden relocation to a new federal prison and questions the purpose of this move. Turcak’s history with the FBI is described as significant: he flipped on the Mexican mob in the late 1990s, helping the FBI lock up more than 40 fellow gangsters, and admitted committing crimes while working as an undercover informant, though he claimed to the sentencing judge that “I didn’t commit those crimes for kicks. I did them because I had to if I wanted to stay alive.”
Liz Collins, who produced the documentary “Fall of Minneapolis” about the death of George Floyd, joins the discussion. She describes Chauvin’s stabbing as occurring eight days after their film’s release, noting that Chauvin described being attacked from behind and stabbed repeatedly with a makeshift knife while he was in a media center making copies. Questions are raised about the guards’ supervision and Chauvin’s current health, as he uses a walker and the full extent of his injuries remains unclear. The timing is deemed suspicious, with claims that the only person to receive an update on Chauvin’s condition before his family was Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who confirmed Chauvin’s stability to the media.
The conversation critiques the choice of Black Friday as the alleged symbolic date and suggests it would be more fitting to reference Martin Luther King Day, the anniversary of George Floyd’s death, or Floyd’s birthday. The claim that the symbolically chosen date was connected to Black Lives Matter and a “black hand symbol” attributed to the Mexican mafia is described as rambling and not clearly coherent. The discussion concludes with acknowledgment of the evolving narrative surrounding Chauvin’s stabbing and the FBI’s involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shocking new details in the attempted murder of America's most high profile inmate. Last Friday, Derek Chauvin was shivved 22 times in the library by another inmate. And now we know who the other inmate was. His name is John Turskack. He's 52, and he's already served twenty seven years of his thirty year sentence.
And with three years left until Freedom apparently decided, I'm gonna murder somebody. Turskack is also a member of the Mexican mafia. And are you ready? An FBI informant. The complaint says Turskack at first denied wanting to kill Chauvin, and then the complaint says the Mexican mafia guy waived his Miranda rights when the FBI agent showed up to interview him.
First of all, why is the FBI conducting the interview? The FBI only shows up to prison murders as if someone's ordered a hit or if the perp or the victim was still informing or all of the above. And why does a guy who knows the criminal justice system waive his Miranda rights and wait until you hear what the FBI says he confessed to? It's just too perfect. The FBI claims that the Mexican mafia guy wanted to murder Chauvin on Black Friday to symbolically avenge Black Lives Matter.
So let me get this straight. The Mexican mafia member who poisoned blacks his whole career with drugs and who was incarcerated during the Black Lives Matter movement is a social justice warrior. And anybody who knows anything about prison knows the Mexicans stay with the Mexicans, the blacks stay with the blacks, and the whites stay with the whites. Mexican inmates don't just start murdering white inmates to show solidarity with black inmates. Maybe.
But here's what's mysterious. Turskak is listed as white, and the origin of his name is Croatian. Now how many Croatians do you know in the Mexican mafia? I didn't know the Mexican mafia was so diverse. So this woke Croatian Mexican mobster FBI informant has been suddenly moved to a new federal prison.
For whose protection exactly? We're not sure. And Turskac's history with the FBI is fascinating. He flipped on the Mexican mob back in the late nineties and helped the FBI lock up more than 40 of his fellow gangsters. He admitted to carrying out a number of crimes while working as an undercover FBI informant, but was furious during his sentencing and told the judge the FBI made him do it.
Quote, I didn't commit those crimes for kicks. I did them because I had to if I wanted to stay alive. I told that to the FBI agents, and they just said, do what you have to do. Liz Collins produced a very eye opening documentary on the death of George Floyd called the fall of Minneapolis, and Liz joins me now. Liz, this is getting stranger by the day.
How do you think this went down?
Speaker 1: Yeah. This certainly took another turn yet today. It was just yesterday that Derek Chauvin's family, in fact, heard that he'd been stabbed 22 times. He described it to them as in being sort of a a media center where he was making copies at the time, and he told them, you know, that he was attacked from behind. He tried to fight him off, but every time he did, he was stabbed again with some sort of makeshift knife that that this guy had.
So there are so many questions about where the guards were at this point, why this guy wasn't wasn't being watched. His family is obviously very fearful of all of this. We know that he's using a walker at this point, so they still don't know the extent of his injuries. They're monitoring that. But it's this all transpires, Jesse.
You know, was on your show before, but this happened eight days after our film was released that questions the FBI involvement in in this case, bringing that out quite a bit in the film for the very first time. So there are still so many questions.
Speaker 0: You're right. Like you said in your documentary, which is amazing that the FBI showed up to the lab. And and it's interesting here, the FBI shows up to the prison after the stabbing, and then the Mexican mafia guy's story changes. And he's some social justice warrior trying to avenge black Americans, black lives matter, Mexican mafia, Croatian. Does that add up?
Speaker 1: No. There there's so much that that just doesn't. Derek Chauvin has been in this medium security facility for fifteen months now with no issues. His family has has been there several times to visit and is in touch with him quite often. We've talked to him as well, of course, for for the film.
So the timing of this is very suspicious. And and, also, let's not forget here that the only person to receive an update on Derek Chauvin's condition after this happened is the man who put him behind bars in the first place, and that's the attorney general of Minnesota, Keith Keith Ellison. He heard, about all of this and was updating the media in Minnesota that that Derek Chauvin was was stable and that he would survive. And that happened days before his own family got word of anything about his condition at all.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Liz, if you're gonna do this symbolically, you don't pick Black Friday. You pick Martin Luther King Day. You kick the anniversary of the death of George Floyd. You pick George Floyd's birthday.
Black Friday? What does that even have to do with black people? Because just it says black? It would. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That complaint, it really makes, very little sense. It's to me either. I agree. But just talking about, that it was symbolic.
You did it on Black Friday because it is symbolic of Black Lives Matter and the black hand symbol associated with the Mexican mafia criminal organization. So it seems like some ramblings, that this John Turcak was coming up with, at the time.
Speaker 0: No. Someone was coming up with him. It's just astounding that this thing took this turn. Liz, great documentary. Thanks for exposing a lot of this information.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Jesse.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
The Secret Behind Joe Biden's Little Desk Set REVEALED? https://t.co/tNQ6VduMNW
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
**THE WOLF OF WASHINGTON** could be in big trouble. Trump wants a look in Nancy’s books and a full investigation of her perfectly-timed stock trades. They write the laws 📜 — then profit off the fallout 💰. That’s not “public service” — that’s **legalized corruption** 💸. Ban it. Now
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on allegations surrounding Nancy Pelosi and potential insider trading. Speaker 1 states that Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because “what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street,” claiming she knows exactly what will be announced, buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcements. Speaker 0 notes Pelosi heard the news and ran to CNN with a busted hip, while Tapper treated her like Biden on debate night. Speaker 2 asserts that Pelosi “became rich,” and Speaker 3 is interrupted about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid, but wants to respond to the insider trading allegation.
Speaker 2 asks Pelosi for a response to the accusation, and Speaker 3 responds that the allegation is ridiculous. Pelosi states she “very much support the stop the trading of members of congress,” clarifying that she does not think anybody is doing anything wrong, but if they are, they are prosecuted and go to jail, because “confidence instills in the American people.” Pelosi adds that she has no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time, and that “I’m not into it. My husband is.” This points to her assertion that her husband handles the investments, not herself.
The discussion continues with a provocative line about Polly P in Napa, described as a Wall Street whiz kid, and reiterates that Pelosi’s wife knows nothing about it. The segment then shifts to the broader political action in the Senate, noting that the Senate is “suiting up,” having “advanced an anti stock trading bill for congress,” while Trump is not pleased.
Throughout, the dialogue juxtaposes accusations of insider trading with Pelosi’s claimed support for prohibiting trading by members of Congress, her denial of personal involvement in the investments, and the implication that her husband handles the investments. There is a consistent focus on the tension between allegations of insider trading and calls for restrictions on congressional stock activities, framed against a broader political backdrop involving Medicaid’s sixtieth anniversary and reactions from political figures such as Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The wolf of Washington could be in big trouble. Investigators might finally get a peek inside Nancy and Polly P's earning sheets.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street. It happened by she knows exactly what's gonna happen, what's gonna be announced. She buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcement's made.
Speaker 0: Nancy heard the news and ran to CNN on a busted hip, but Tapper treated her like Biden on debate night.
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi became rich.
Speaker 3: I might have to read that. We're here to talk about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed to come to talk about.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But I wanted
Speaker 3: to that means in the election.
Speaker 2: I wanted to give you a chance just to respond. He accused you of insider trading. What's your response to that?
Speaker 3: That that's ridiculous. In fact, I very much support the stop the trading of members of congress. Not that I think anybody's doing anything wrong. If they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail. But because of the, confidence it instills in the American people, don't worry about this.
But I have no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time. I'm not into it. My husband is.
Speaker 0: I'm not into it. My husband is. So Polly pees in Napa, a Wall Street whiz kid, and his wife knows Nada. If pillows could talk. Meanwhile, the senate's suiting up too.
They just advanced an anti stock trading bill for congress, but Trump's not pleased.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Glenn Beck uncovers the ties between USAID, CIA, and Soros. USAID is clearly the head of the deep state snake. We now know who owns the politicians that are having a melt down about a USAID audit. https://t.co/a45TE0TEvc
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a picture here of an Al Qaeda leader and they are in a USAID tent. Look who signed the check for the initial $200,000 payment to the Islamic Relief Agency, the United States Agency for International Development. USAID was running a top secret espionage program to undermine Cuba and push people to dissent. Now let me show you how much money we're talking about. It included a billion dollar sovereign loan guarantee, $320,000,000 in general assistance. Judicial Watch found that the US State Department and USAID had been giving millions to the Macedonian arm of George Soros' Open Society Foundation. To train youth movements. So USAID and those are always they're known by anybody who pays attention as CIA fronts. This is you know, the the USAID comes into a country. they start doing things, and next thing you know, we've got a revolution on our hands because that's the CIA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a picture here of an Al Qaeda leader and they are in a USAID tent. Look who signed the check for the initial $200,000 payment to the Islamic Relief Agency, the United States Agency for International Development. The more you look into USAID, the more shocked you will become. USAID was running a top secret espionage program to undermine Cuba and push people to dissent. Now let me show you how much money we're talking about.
It included a billion dollar sovereign loan guarantee, $320,000,000 in general assistance. So where else beside the NIH has money been coming from? By far, the largest donors are from USAID and the Department of Defense? Judicial Watch found that the US State Department and USAID had been giving millions to the Macedonian arm of George Soros' Open Society Foundation. What for?
To train youth movements. So USAID and those are always they're known by anybody who pays attention as CIA fronts. This is you know, the the USAID comes into a country. They start doing things, and next thing you know, we've got a revolution on our hands because that's the CIA.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
"Whether I lost $2 billion or $5 billion, it doesn't make any difference to me. I don't care. If you're rich, it doesn't matter. I'm doing this for the country, I'm doing this for the people." https://t.co/LQQrONZFPZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues that "If you're rich, it doesn't matter" and that "I'm doing this for the country" while discussing presidents who ran businesses, notably George Washington who "ran his business" and was "a rich man" with "two desks." He claims it cost him "anywhere from 2 to $5,000,000,000 to be president," but says "if you can afford it" it's worth it because he's making a difference for the country. He notes Doral "was setting records" before announcing his candidacy and that politics reduced his market to "50%." He proclaims the country is stronger "now... maybe ever," with "the best unemployment numbers" and soldiers "being brought back home from the endless wars." He attacks Pelosi, Schiff, and Schumer, warns North Korea could lead to war, and says "North Korea's I like him. He likes me."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're rich, it doesn't matter. I'm doing this for the country. I'm doing it for the people. I don't know if you know George Washington. He ran his business simultaneously while he was president.
Many other presidents there weren't too many really rich presidents, but there were a few. They ran their business. Hey, Obama made a deal for a book. Is that running a business? I I'm sure he didn't even discuss it while he was president.
Yeah. He has a deal with Netflix. When did they start talking about that? That's only, you know, a couple of examples. But other presidents, if you look, other presidents were wealthy, not huge wealth.
George Washington was actually considered a very, very rich man at the time. But they ran their businesses. George Washington, they say, had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk. I don't think you people with this phony emoluments clause and by the way, I would say that it's cost me anywhere from 2 to $5,000,000,000 to be president.
And that's okay between what I lose and what I could have made. I would have made a fortune if I just ran my business. I was doing it really well. I I have a great business. I have the best properties.
But between what I lose and in all fairness, some properties, Doral's an example. Doral was setting records when I bought it because I owned it for a period of time. Setting records. It was going to there was nothing like I was making a fortune. And then what happened?
I announced I'm gonna run for office. Right? And all of us and I say we're gonna build a wall. We're gonna have borders. We're have this.
We're gonna have that. All of a sudden, people some people didn't like it. They thought the rhetoric was too tough. And it went from doing great to doing fine. It does very nicely now.
It's actually coming back, I understand, very strongly. But Doral was setting records. And I knew this would happen. Most of the stuff that I have because now instead of having a 100% of the market that loves you and they love your brand and it's luxury and it's great, now you have 50% of the market. That's called politics.
I fully understood that. So it's cost me between 2,000,000,000 and $5,000,000,000. And if I had it to do again, I do it in an instant. Because who cares? If you can afford it, what difference does it make?
If I had this to do again because I'm making a big difference for the country. The country is stronger now than it's been in many years, maybe ever. Our military's rebuilt. Our economy is hitting records. As I said, best unemployment numbers, best employment numbers were strong.
We're bringing our soldiers back home from the endless wars. We're doing great. So whether I lost $2,000,000,000, $5,000,000,000, more or less, doesn't make any difference to me. I don't care. If you're rich, it doesn't matter.
I'm doing this for the country. I'm doing it for the people that show up. I haven't had an empty seat at a rally. I always say, where's the rally? It's in a certain place.
Okay. Just get the biggest arena. I go into these massive basketball arena, it's like in Dallas where the Mavericks play and fill it up and set a record. I've set a record almost every place I've been because we just need a little small stage. We don't need basketball courts, ice hockey courts.
And I take less than musicians because they have bands. I don't have band. I set the world record for somebody without a guitar. Okay? I don't have bands.
Right? So that's the story. And, you know, those people are the poll. And I had great polls. I have my best polls now.
I think it's because people think that it's terrible what they're doing. Pelosi, Shifty Schiff, Schumer, These people are trying to destroy the country. It's a very bad thing what they're doing. The president of The United States should be allowed to run the country, not have to focus on this kind of crap, while at the same time doing a great job on Syria and Turkey and all of the other things that we're doing. North Korea, okay, maybe someday.
But I'll tell you what, if somebody else became president with that same mindset that they had, you'd right now be in a big war with North Korea. You don't hear too much about it. It could happen. It could happen. I don't know.
I always say, who knows? It steals. Who knows? But in the meantime, North Korea's I like him. He likes me.
We get along. I respect him. He respects me. You could end up in a war. President Obama told me that.
He said the biggest problem, I don't know how to solve it. He told me he doesn't know how to solve it. I said, did you ever call him? No. Actually, he tried 11 times.
But the man on the other side, the gentleman on the other side did not take his call. Okay? Lack of respect, but he takes my call. Thank you very much, everybody.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Did you hear about this video that was just banned on TikTok? I didn’t believe it until I saw it - Tulsi Gabbard https://t.co/Y95r8E5QUJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 introduces a video TikTok banned for being “too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive.” Speaker 1 urges: “If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up.” “If girls and women's sports matter and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up.” “If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls' sports because it's, well, obvious, Stand up.” “Don't be cowed by people who call you a bigot.” “Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet.” “We deserve our own sports, privacy, fairness, safety.” “We deserve a chance to compete and win.” Speaker 0 calls it “Crazy. Right? Not what you expected.” and says it’s a sign of this insane time where “the biological differences between men and women and boys and girls actually exist” and “There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok.” He notes “There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo the Biden administration's destruction of title nine.” “We have to keep building the momentum, keep sharing the truth, speaking the truth, and supporting those who do.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard about this latest video that TikTok banned because they found it to be too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive? Well, if you haven't seen it yet, here it is. Brace yourself.
Speaker 1: If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up. If girls and women's sports matter and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up. If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls' sports because it's, well, obvious, Stand up. Don't be cowed by people who call you a bigot. You're not a bigot.
Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet. Sit down. Be nice. It's not nice to further a lie.
It's not mean to believe in women's equality. We deserve our own sports, privacy, fairness, safety. We deserve a chance to compete and win. So don't be nice. Don't be careful.
Be honest. Be brave. Fight for winning. We've come too far to give up now. And if you agree with that, stand up and stand with us.
Speaker 0: Crazy. Right? Not what you expected. It it's a sign of this insane time that we are living in where something that is undeniably and objectively true, the biological differences between men and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok.
We have to keep our eyes open to what is going on and continue to lift our voices and not allow them to ban us from seeing this truth and from sharing this truth. There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo the Biden administration's destruction of title nine. We have to keep building the momentum, keep sharing the truth, speaking the truth, and supporting those who do.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Is it starting to make sense now? https://t.co/efEijZTB3w
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in The United States. It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable buildups as fascist or Nazi or anti Semitic and use the prestige of anti fascist intolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in The United States. It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable buildups as fascist or Nazi or anti Semitic and use the prestige of anti fascist intolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Never let anyone intimidate you for exercising your First Amendment right to free speech. https://t.co/M207m434Kd
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Please keep doctor Martin Luther King Junior's name out of your mouths."
"How about we'll quote whoever we wanna quote? How about that's my first amendment right? We will quote who we please to quote, and we will continue to speak freely because, yeah, I'm a veteran."
"That's the country that I serve. That's a constitution I sworn allegiance to, and that oath has no expiration date."
"When I started off in radio, we would get complaints, complaints about words or phrases or crossing the line, ideas, we would offend people."
"If somebody complained about something you said, they were always from the religious right that wrote a letter to your program director saying, you need to be canceled."
"Now, that sounds quaint and comical now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please keep doctor Martin Luther King Junior's name out of your mouths. I appreciate my colleague for exemplifying exactly the kind of oppression of freedoms that we're referencing. How about we'll quote whoever we wanna quote? How about that's my first amendment right? We will quote who we please to quote, and we will continue to speak freely because, yeah, I'm a veteran.
That's the country that I serve. That's a constitution I sworn allegiance to, and that oath has no expiration date.
Speaker 1: When I started off in radio, we would get complaints, complaints about words or phrases or crossing the line, ideas, we would offend people. If somebody complained about something you said, they were always from the religious right that wrote a letter to your program director saying, you need to be canceled. Now, that sounds quaint and comical now. Right? We all know that if your program director got a letter from some group who wanted to pull you off the air, they would be atheist and from the left.
So and by the way, nobody complained more about the religious right wing people than the progressive left wing people. Like, oh, those do gooders, leave us alone. Let us express ourselves creatively. If you don't like it, don't listen. You're gonna let a couple of
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
A transgender man grows nervous about an upcoming visit to the gynecologist. No, this isn't satire. ~Thomas Sowell https://t.co/koHs5ty9n4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm a trans guy. I've never been to the gynecologist. Today's the fucking day. I asked that they put a note on it: this is a trans guy; he's gonna present male. I called today to make sure the note's on my chart. She said, "The notes on your chart that you're, a trans man and blah blah blah." Okay. Cool. Have a good day, miss Allen. She works at a women's health clinic, and my name is fucking Sasha. Jesus Christ, guys. Full transparency, I'm tweaking out. My anxiety for my fucking audition for The Voice was, like, here. My gyno visit is here. If anything weird occurs, like, people with good intention can just say things uncomfortable and awkward. I don't have the mental capacity; but all I know is afterwards, I'm getting a sweet treat and I'll tell you how it goes. So fucking pray for me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a trans guy. I've never been to the gynecologist. I always said I was never gonna fucking go. I couldn't handle it. But today's the fucking day.
I'm shitting my pants. I made the appointment. I asked that they, like, put a little note on it that's like, this is a trans guy. He's gonna present male. I, like, wanted the front desk to know.
I wanted the doctors to Like, I called today to, like, make sure. Was like, I just wanna make sure, like, that note's on my chart. She's like, yeah. The notes on your chart that you're, a trans man and blah blah blah. And I was like, okay.
Cool. She's like, okay. Have a good day, miss Allen. No no no blame to her. She works at a women's health clinic, and my name is fucking Sasha.
But Jesus Christ, guys. Full transparency, I'm tweaking out. Like, my anxiety for, like, my fucking audition for The Voice was, like, here. My gyno visit is here. Just know that if anything weird occurs, like like, people with good intention can just say things uncomfortable and awkward.
I don't have the mental capacity. The thing is, like, usually, I have the mental capacity. I'm a I'm a chill guy. But when you're about to get, like, your your shit spread on a fucking table and and a dude, yeah, dude's gonna look in there, I guys, my my tolerance for anything right now is, like, zero. All I know is afterwards, I'm gonna get a sweet treat, and I'm gonna let all of you know how it goes.
So fucking pray for me.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Joe Rogan reacting to Charlie Kirk being shot as the news came in https://t.co/5E9K1luEfR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Participants discuss the news that Charlie Kirk was shot, with uncertainty about whether he is dead: "Murder for having a different opinion from somebody else." They note, "I haven't seen anything that said confirmed." Rumors about who shot him spur debate: "a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration"—"That's a crazy take." They stress we "We don't know any of full details of this yet" and that "it's not a tweet. It's not on their Twitter account" or anything, with clips shared by "Dave Portnoy reposted this." The mood is horror and condemnation: "Nobody deserves that." They condemn the culture of division, call out "paid propagandists masquerading as the news," and warn this event could either spur meaningful dialogue or fuel violence and fear. The speakers fear the impact on political courage and discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this just happened. We just found out that Charlie Kirk got shot.
Speaker 1: It's fucking awful.
Speaker 0: And is he dead? No.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. That's what was just One of the guys out there just said Okay.
Speaker 0: Confirmed he's dead.
Speaker 1: The lobby was just
Speaker 2: I was look I've been looking. I haven't seen anything that said confirmed.
Speaker 0: Woah.
Speaker 1: Murder for having a different opinion from somebody else. Yeah. Different ideology from somebody else.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Beliefs that didn't align. Yeah. I'm sorry? Yep. Rest in peace.
We're in
Speaker 2: Fox News.
Speaker 1: Jesus. 27 years old, maybe? 30?
Speaker 0: Even have a a suspect?
Speaker 2: I don't know. That's why I don't I don't I'm literally trying to check it all on Twitter, and it's all
Speaker 1: Fuck. Fuck. Nobody deserves he he doesn't deserve that. Nobody deserves that.
Speaker 0: So so were you saying that MSNBC had a crazy take on it? Mhmm. What was their take?
Speaker 2: Matt, I I'm literally just reading Twitter, so I didn't see the video. I just saw people talking about tweets of it. I'll pull it up, though. Let me see. Fuck.
And even now they could have taken it down.
Speaker 0: It was a tweet or a video?
Speaker 2: I don't I so I don't
Speaker 3: I don't I I'm, you
Speaker 2: know, doing the show while I'm trying to
Speaker 0: figure out Right. No. I understand.
Speaker 2: I think they were live on the air and people clipped what they were talking about. It's not a tweet. It's not on their Twitter account
Speaker 1: or anything.
Speaker 0: So it's someone's hot take.
Speaker 2: Live in the moment.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's a crazy take. Crazy take is that what was the take that they deserved to?
Speaker 2: No. I I that's why I didn't wanna pair
Speaker 0: it. Right.
Speaker 2: Here you go. Dave Portnoy reposted this.
Speaker 0: You found it? Oh, here. Put it It's only ten seconds.
Speaker 2: In which a shooting like this happens.
Speaker 0: You can put the headphones on.
Speaker 4: Can Yeah. And, again, to emphasize what you just emphasized, we don't know any of full details of this yet. We don't know if this was the supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or so. We have no idea. But
Speaker 2: That's what that's what the crazy thing was.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's it. Yeah. That if it was
Speaker 2: a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration. What?
Speaker 0: Someone shot their gun off in celebration and killed him.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You shoot celebration guns in the air.
Speaker 0: Oh god. Just What a crazy take. Like, it might not have been someone assassinating someone for the wrong opinion. Fuck.
Speaker 1: Why does something like that have to be spun?
Speaker 0: Their ideology.
Speaker 1: No. I know what I'm saying. It's like
Speaker 0: I mean, they wanna try to pin it on a Trump supporter with a crazy Trump supporter with a gun
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Going wacky. Of course. We don't know if it was a supporter shooting off a gun in celebration, because, you know, they do.
Speaker 1: Right. Right. Right. A lot
Speaker 0: of folks are just
Speaker 1: Of course.
Speaker 0: Constantly out there shooting off guns at large gatherings in celebration.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Fourth of July, I can't leave your house.
Speaker 0: You know? What the fuck?
Speaker 1: No. That is that that that's a wow.
Speaker 0: There's gonna be a lot of people celebrating this. It's so scary. It's so dangerous to to to to celebrate or to, in any way, encourage this kind of behavior from human beings. He's not a violent guy who's talking talking to people on college campuses. Wasn't even particularly rude.
He's tried to be pretty reasonable with people.
Speaker 1: Everything I saw seemed reasonable. He's a
Speaker 0: very intelligent guy. Yeah. You know, whether you agree with him or don't. And there's a lot of stuff that I didn't agree with him on. That's fine.
You're you're allowed to disagree with people without celebrating the fact they got shot.
Speaker 1: But you can't disrespect his passion.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, what you're supposed to do with a guy like that if you're opposing him is debate him. Right. Have a conversation where your your argument is more compelling than his. Sure.
That's what people should be celebrating, discourse. You know? We used to do that.
Speaker 1: Do some homework and and bring it to the table.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's
Speaker 0: horrible. It's horrible. Podcast has been a lot about violence, man.
Speaker 1: It has, but not this kind. No. I I I'm sorry. Not not something is is so in the moment right now from someone that that this currently current Yeah. That that that we see and and are are are, know, aware of daily.
Mhmm. Right?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, he's one of those young influencers, right, this time from the right who is all over social media, always doing these various shows and debating people and talk to people and giving speeches and Sure. Yeah. No one deserves this, folks. No one that has different opinions.
No one deserves that. No. This is horrible. No. But I know people are gonna celebrate it because this is a fucked up time, and people have really fallen into this trap of us against them.
Speaker 1: But it's also gonna make people not wanna be as courageous or not wanna be as as as as as forthright with with the things they believe. It's gonna it's gonna put people on guard.
Speaker 0: It could. It it also could
Speaker 1: It could do the opposite. Yeah. I I I get that, but there's also going to be that sort of ingrained thing now.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. You're correct. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And, you you know, and just go you know, going through the whole New York thing, I just you know, sometimes you're you you know, there's a there's a crowd, and it's all love. It's all love, and all they want is, you know, is is your signature or a photo or this and that. But there's so much of those moments where you're spent looking down. Mhmm. You're looking down the entire time.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And I I don't think anybody wants to shoot me. I don't I don't think that that's kind of out in the world. Right? No. But it just it's it's the type of shit that just lives in in in the back of one's mind.
Yeah. Because how could it not?
Speaker 0: How could it not?
Speaker 1: And then and then the thing like today, and you're like, okay. That that's why it's in it's it's in it's in the back of our minds.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You know? Well, it's you know, when we're talking about assassinations earlier, whether it's Kennedy or RFK or, you know, you think of him in the past, you think of him like you don't when something happens in the the current, like, now with this one with Charlie Kirk, it doesn't seem real. No. It seems very surreal.
Speaker 1: It does.
Speaker 0: It does. Seems like
Speaker 1: It does.
Speaker 0: It's gonna take a long time before we reference this as some something that happened. Like, oh, remember he got shot and killed? Oh, yeah. Like, right now, it's just doesn't seem real. It seems it seems so crazy that just it's not registering.
Speaker 1: It's not. No. Is is is he is is he a friend?
Speaker 0: No. I met him once. Okay.
Speaker 1: I met
Speaker 0: him once at a gun range of all places. Wow. Wow. Yeah. He was a nice guy when I met him.
Wow. It's a fucked up time. People are so divided in this country. So divided, and there's so many people that love it. They love that we're divided, and they profit off that division, and they stoke the fires, and and they do it for their own profit, and it's so fucking gross.
It's so gross. And to encourage this kind of thing is really one of the most horrific things that you could do after someone dies horribly like this is celebrate.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's it's it's on it's on It
Speaker 0: should be a wake up call for everybody. Like, this is nuts. This is nuts.
Speaker 1: No. It's not it's it's unforgivable that that that to spend things like that and because the people they're never thinking about is is is that person's family.
Speaker 0: I think they're just No. That's just like default with those. They gaslight you by default.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: So immediately, they try to find some reason why the whatever the the thing is that's in the news is someone else's fault.
Speaker 1: Right. Of course.
Speaker 0: It's just all gaslighting, and that's what they're paid to do. They're paid propagandists masquerading as the news. So weird. Fuck.
Speaker 1: No. This is a this is it's it's a dark day.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It is. Well, one of the thing two things is gonna happen. Either people are gonna realize how fucking insane this is, and we have to have a conversation about being able to have conversations.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Or it's gonna get a lot worse. That's what's scary. Scary just could spark off some kind of a real violent conflict. You know? That guy had a lot of fans.
Yeah. A lot of people love that guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I know.
Speaker 0: And if they find out that he got killed for something that they vehemently oppose in the first place, it could send people over the edge.
Speaker 1: It could. It could. Yeah. There there there there's always that flash point moment
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: In in in in any you know, in in previous times like this.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: You know? Yep. It's there's always that tipping point moment.
Speaker 0: Like like the Rodney King film. Yep. Right? Something. Yep.
Just like that's it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You know, this also highlights just a little bit of perspective, like, how lucky Trump is was.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1: You know? And it's just like Charlie didn't get the benefit of a head turn or a couple a couple of microns or millimeters or you know? And it's just like, wow. Wow. Who who who decides that?
Yeah. You know? That is just
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a shocking scandal involving Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who has reportedly received over a million dollars in campaign donations from Chinese Communist Party operatives. After accepting the funds, she appointed these individuals to her advisory board, sparking serious concerns about her integrity. This situation raises broader issues about foreign interests infiltrating American politics. With increasing calls for investigations, it seems Los Angeles may be facing significant challenges regarding foreign influence. Bass should prepare for the fallout.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
In a jaw-dropping revelation, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has found herself at the center of a scandal involving over a million dollars in campaign donations from Chinese Communist Party operatives. After pocketing the cash, she appointed these operatives to her advisory board, raising eyebrows and serious questions about her integrity. The implications of this scandal go beyond just Bass; they highlight a troubling pattern of elite capture where foreign interests infiltrate American politics. As calls for investigations grow louder, one must wonder: is Los Angeles now a playground for foreign influence? Bass better brace herself—this could get messy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Transcript describes allegations from a Daily Caller investigation regarding Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass. It claims Bass accepted campaign donations totaling over $1,000,000 from two bankers linked to the Chinese Communist Party and connected to the United Front Work Department, described in the report as China's primary intelligence and influence operation. The transcript states that immediately after receiving these donations, Bass appointed the two bankers to a mayoral transition advisory team, the group charged with guiding policy and staffing decisions for the entire administration. The summary notes that these materials are presented as findings from the Daily Caller investigation publicly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, the ultra leftist who sides with illegal migrants over citizens, has just been exposed in a bombshell investigation by the Daily Caller. According to their investigation, mayor Bass took campaign donations totaling over $1,000,000 from two Chinese Communist Party linked bankers, both connected to what's called the United Front Work Department, China's primary intelligence and influence operation. But here's the kicker. Immediately after taking their money, Bass appointed them to a mayoral transition advisory team, the very group tasked with guiding policy and staffing decisions for entire administration.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
The DOGE theme song https://t.co/vYlFwIEwVV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government can take your money, tax the sunrise and the trees, and collect fees from businesses. They mix it up with eyes to make it all taste good.
The government takes everything to pay for solutions like healthcare, climate change, and pollution, even if it means throwing away the Constitution. They can give a bailout and tell us to behave, making the founding fathers roll over in their graves.
The government makes mistakes and is power-hungry, with fictitious economics. Instead of getting fired for failure, they give themselves a raise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who can take your money?
Speaker 1: Who can take your money?
Speaker 0: With a twinkle in their eye. A twinkle in their eye.
Speaker 1: Take it all away and give it to some other guy. The government.
Speaker 2: The government can. And who
Speaker 0: can tax the sunrise? Who can tax the trees? Can tax the trees?
Speaker 1: Let your own a business and collect up all the fees. Government the government
Speaker 0: can. The government can.
Speaker 1: And the government can because they mix it up with eyes and make it all taste good. The
Speaker 3: government takes everything we make to pay for
Speaker 0: all of their solutions. Like health care, climate change, pollution. Just throw away the constitution. I wrote that. Thank you.
And who can give a bailout?
Speaker 1: Tell us to behave.
Speaker 0: Tell us to behave.
Speaker 1: And make the founding fathers roll over in their grave. I don't care if you hate me. I'm gonna sing
Speaker 2: it anyway. The government can. And
Speaker 1: the government can go and mix
Speaker 0: it up. Well, I'll make it all yummy, yummy, yummy, yummy.
Speaker 3: The government mistakes, everything.
Speaker 1: They're all power hungry and delicious.
Speaker 0: Their economics are fictitious. Soon we'll have to eat our dish.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And
Speaker 0: who can be a failure in so many ways.
Speaker 1: And instead of getting fired,
Speaker 0: hey, we'll give ourself a raise. California, you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 3: Get down.
Speaker 1: And I feel so good. I could.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
I agree with Elon! Do you? https://t.co/Rh0wZbrdcx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fake NGOs are often fake charities, mostly run by Democrats, though Republicans may be involved to maintain silence. Billions of dollars are given to these Democrat-run NGOs, which then go through a network of additional NGOs. This is described as a giant money laundering scheme, where the terms NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Arrests are needed in this regard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fake NGOs. I think there needs to be a a number of arrests in that regard as well because these these are these are fake charities, where, mostly Democrats and wasn't both. It's I I don't wanna be fair. There's there's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there because they sometimes throw the Republicans a bone to say, hey. Be be quiet about this.
So it's it's it's it's that's that's that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. Mhmm. But it it is overwhelmingly to Democrats, and they they give these give billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a whole network of additional gen NGOs. It's a giant money laundering scheme. Really, at at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Smart Kid https://t.co/edbtyLtKMf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts feeling excluded during a principal's speech about equality that omitted mention of their race. Writing "all lives matter" on a whiteboard was deemed political and offensive, while signs promoting specific races and orientations were considered human rights. When the speaker questioned the equity statement's lack of representation for all students, they were told "whites have a pretty good situation right now."
The speaker claims that teachers are afraid to voice dissenting opinions for fear of administrative discipline, and that students adjust their schoolwork to align with acceptable opinions in order to secure good grades. The speaker states a coworker of color agreed that the school seemed to be pushing a leftist agenda.
Due to these experiences, the speaker is leaving the district to attend a private Christian school online, sacrificing graduation milestones to learn in an environment that doesn't punish them for their skin color and political views. The speaker concludes by stating their belief that everyone has value regardless of skin color or personal beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll take you back to my first day at RHS this fall. The principal came out and gave us a heartfelt speech about equality and standing together. He began to list countless races such as Latino, Asian, expressing how much they matter and how important they are. But never once did he mention a race or identity that reflects me or half the kids that were in the class. Now members of the board, I know you haven't been to school in a while and I know most of the peep I know none of you or most of you don't have any kids left in the school district, but you must admit how uncomfortable it will be to be characterized just by your skin color on the first day of school and be thought that you were wrong just because of your skin color.
So I'll never forget the look one of my friends gave me from across the room as we were sitting there listening to this blatant bias being expressed in the so called equity statement by the leader of our school. To be clear, I don't need you to tell me that I matter, but hearing the condolences given to other races and leaving just one race out, it inevitably, you'll start to feel like you've done something wrong. And in our principal's attempt to unify us, he instead created unwarranted boundaries and barriers between his students, pitting us against each other based on characteristics that we can't control. In another separate instance, I was told that writing all lives matter on the whiteboard was political and could be seen as offensive. When I questioned the teacher after class, she told me that she didn't have an answer and she just had to erase it and it was quickly erased.
There are political signs all over RHS about specific races that matter, specific sexual orientations that matter and specific perspectives that matter. But when I questioned the RHS administration about how these signs were political, they told me that they were supporting human rights. So when I questioned why the equity statement couldn't represent all students, they told me that to even ask that question was outlandish and offensive. And they when I asked why that was, they told me quote, whites have a pretty good situation right now, unquote. So is that not racism?
Disregarding my question merely because of the color of my skin. To be honest, after enduring a year of the people in charge telling me that I'm a racist and I'm privileged and pointing out our irreversible differences, I've never noticed race more. And it's becoming the first thing I notice when I meet someone, which has never before been the case. RHS administration confidently told me that RHS students and staff are happy with their equity statement. But from the my experience in talking with other students, this is not the case.
I know many kids who disagree with their teachers, but they're too scared to stand up because they're worried that their grades will be docked and their learning experience will be affected. My honors government teacher, I'm not gonna say his name, but he's mentioned that Democrats care more about all people while Republicans only care about themselves. And he's also inferred to us that socialism is better than democracy. He even had a statue he had a statue of a socialist leader in his classroom. I have been I've been told by a lot of kids that they just stay silent and adjust their schoolwork to reflect an acceptable opinion to secure a good grade.
I've been approached by multiple teachers who have told me in private that they just wanna say that they agree with me and they support me standing up, but they can't say it in front of the class for fear of being disciplined by the administration in some way or losing their jobs. There is clearly only one way to think in this district and that is that they are teaching their kids to shut up if they don't agree. Now members of the board, I want you to take a good look at yourselves in the mirror tonight and ask, are you really standing up for the inequality of all people, or are you just pushing a damaging political ideology, on on our students? A fellow coworker at my job, who by the way is of color, discreetly told me that the school seemed to be pushing a very leftist agenda in class. This proved that not everyone is happy with your school and not everyone who isn't happy is white.
Now due to all these instances I've mentioned and many more that I can't fit in this five minute speech, I've decided to leave this district and continue school on a private Christian school online. And there will be sacrifices, and I will not get to walk in the graduation ceremony or attend milestones at RHS, but I will be able to learn in an environment that is not intent on punishing me daily for my skin color and political views. Now regardless how you take my speech, whether you just shrug it off as malarkey or Fox News talking points, I encourage you to think about it because someday I'm going to be a leader. I may be the president, a governor, or just a professional golfer, but I will never stop believing that everybody has value no matter their skin color or personal beliefs. It's a shame that you're not gonna be able to say that I was an alumni of RHS in District 196.
Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve US-made Stinger Missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional approval. The deal, brokered by Hillary Clinton and arms dealer Marc Turi, led to some missiles ending up in Afghanistan, where one was used against a US Chinook. In a panic, Stevens was dispatched for a "do-or-die" mission, explaining the Stand Down Orders during the embassy siege. The State Department, not the CIA, supplied these missiles, and Obama misled the public about the attack's cause. The Taliban leveraged this situation, leading to the controversial release of five Taliban generals in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
In 2008, CBS actually aired a report by Sharyl Attkisson exposing how top vaccine advocates received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies—raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest in vaccine safety claims. Can you imagine the MSM airing such a report today?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child by Two, and Dr. Paul Offit are trusted voices in vaccine safety, but CBS News found they have financial ties to the vaccine industry. The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education, and building costs. Wyeth gave $342,000 to the academy for a community grant, and Merck contributed $433,000 the same year the academy endorsed Merck’s HPV vaccine. Every Child by Two takes money from the vaccine industry, and its treasurers have included an official from Wyeth and a paid adviser to pharmaceutical clients. Dr. Offit holds a $1.5 million research chair at Children's Hospital funded by Merck and holds the patent on Rotatec, an anti-diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck. Royalties for the vaccine were sold for $182 million. The American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child by Two, and Dr. Offit say they are upfront about the money they receive and that it doesn’t sway their opinions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Years now parents have wondered if vaccines are linked to conditions like autism and ADD. Government officials and some scientists say there is no connection and they're often backed by independent experts. But just how independent are they? You may be surprised at what Cheryl Atkinson found when she set out to follow the money. Just waiting for it to come.
Speaker 1: They're some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety. The American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child by Two, and pediatrician Doctor. Paul Offit. But CBS News has found these three have something more in common. Strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend.
The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes, even help pay to build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces. Three and forty two thousand was given to the academy by Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine for a community grant program. 433,000 was contributed to the academy by Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck's HPV vaccine. Another top donor, Sanofi Aventis, maker of 17 vaccines, and a new five and one combo shot just added to the childhood vaccine schedule last month.
Every Child by two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry too, but wouldn't tell us how much. A spokesman told us there are simply no conflicts to be unearthed. But guess who has been listed as the group's treasurers, an official from Wyeth and a paid adviser to big pharmaceutical clients. Then there's doctor Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely quoted defender of vaccine safety. He's gone so far as to say babies can theoretically tolerate quote 10,000 vaccines at once.
This is how Offit described himself in a previous interview.
Speaker 2: I'm the chief of infectious diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor of pediatrics at Penns Medical School.
Speaker 1: Doctor. Offit was not willing to be interviewed on this subject, but like others in our investigation, he has strong industry ties. In fact, he's a vaccine industry insider. Doctor. Offit holds a $1,500,000 research chair at Children's Hospital funded by Merck.
He holds the patent on an anti diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck, Rotatec, which has prevented thousands of hospitalizations in The US. And future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182,000,000 cash. Doctor Offit's share of vaccine profits unknown. There's nothing illegal about the possible conflicts of interest. But as one member of Congress put it, money from the pharmaceutical industry can shape the practices of those who hold themselves out to be independent.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child by Two and Doctor. Offit wouldn't agree to interviews, but all told us they're up front about the money they receive and it doesn't sway their opinions. Today's immunization schedule now calls for kids to get 55 doses of vaccines by age six. Ideally, it makes for a healthier society. But critics worry that industry ties could impact the advice given to the public about all those vaccines.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
She ran because she couldn't answer the question! Great job Senator Cruz! https://t.co/H7LKppBSV2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims BLM calls for boycotting "white capitalism" and dismantling "patriarchal practices" and the "western prescribed nuclear family." Despite this, corporations like Ubisoft, DoorDash, Amazon, Gatorade, Nabisco, Deckers, Microsoft, Dropbox, and Fitbit donate to BLM. The speaker finds it ironic that Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, who are white, fund an organization that calls for boycotting their own companies. He believes corporate funding of "explicitly Marxist terrorist organizations" leads to violence. He enters an article titled "Who is Black Lives Matter?" into the record. He asserts that while black lives matter, the BLM organization's goal to defund police would result in more black lives lost.
Senator Hirono responds that all violent extremists should be denounced, including right-wing extremists who killed Officer Underwood. She questions whether defunding police should be taken literally and defends the right to boycott as freedom of speech. She accuses Republicans of using the deaths of black police officers for political points and suggests the chairman isn't listening.
The speaker notes that Senator Hirono did not say anything negative about Antifa, nor did any other Democrat present. He also notes that none of the seven Democratic senators apologized for Democrats calling law enforcement officers Nazis, stormtroopers, or Geschappa.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're welcome to say something negative about Antifa right now. What else does BLM, the organization, support? On its website, it is called for a quote boycott of white capitalism. In 2017, they called on people not to spend any money with white corporations. And not only that, the BLM website says that that one of their objective is dismantling the quote patriarchal practices and disrupting the western prescribed nuclear family.
That's what they say their objectives are. Now, the reason that matters is right now corporate America is desperate to demonstrate their virtue as we see great racial dissension. So Black Lives Matter, BLM, the group, raises money on act blue, the fundraising mechanism for virtually every elected democrat in congress. Among the donors to BLM, the organization according to public reports include the company Ubisoft, which is given between 50 and a hundred thousand dollars, DoorDash which is given reportedly $500,000, Amazon, which is given an unidentified portion of $10,000,000 Gatorade, which is given an unidentified portion of $500,000 Nabisco, which is given an unidentified portion of $500,000 Deckers, which is given an unidentified portion of $500,000 Microsoft, which is given $250,000 Dropbox, which is given $500,000 and Fitbit, which the amount given is not identified. I would note Microsoft, the largest individual shareholder is Bill Gates.
More than ironic that Microsoft is funding an organization calling for boycotting all white corporations. Bill Gates is white. Microsoft is literally funding an organization calling for Microsoft to be defunded. Jeff Bezos, the largest owner of Amazon who likewise is funding this radical Marxist group. Jeff Bezos is white too.
And he's funding an organization that that is call calling for the boycotting of Amazon. This is dangerous and it's worth understanding that when corporate America floods millions of dollars into explicitly Marxist terrorist organizations that glorify cop killers, that glorify violence, that the violence and terrorism that flows from that should not be surprising. Without objection, I'm gonna enter into the record an article from the Washington Examiner dated 07/23/2020. The title of which is, who is black lives matter? And I would encourage anyone who wants to understand who this organization is to read this article.
On the proposition as a value proposition, do black lives matter? Absolutely, yes. And our nation was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal regardless of race or skin color. But the organization that has seized that name is very different. And if they succeeded with their stated number one objective of defunding and abolishing every police department, many many more black lives would would be lost because more African Americans would be murdered without the police officers that bravely risked their lives to defend those communities.
Senator Verona.
Speaker 1: Mister chairman, I have to say Sometimes, I don't think you listen. So, how many times have I had to say that we all should be denouncing violent extremists of every strike? Does that include the way, I have the time. By the way, you know, the Republicans are constantly using I have to say, you you brought it up yourself. The deaths of these black police officers, Patrick Underwood and David Dorn, for making political points.
And the fact that it was right wing extremists who killed Officer Underwood, that seems to be lost in this argument. And now there are all these attacks about Black Lives Matter and what they're saying. I mean, how many of us even think that defunding police departments should be taken literally? I mean, I certainly don't. So we have this pesky thing called freedom of speech.
And I'd say that the people who support Black Lives Matter, and if they're calling for various boycotts and all that, that's called freedom of speech. And that's what the steering title is, protecting speech. So all I can say is, look, we should all join hands in denouncing and whatever words you want to use about violent extremism of all stripes. And I think we can all agree on that. So to constantly accuse Democrats of not caring about that is really, I I I can only say that you you aren't listening.
So I hope this is the end of this hearing mister chairman and that we don't have to listen to any more of your rhetorical speeches. Thank you very much. I'm leaving.
Speaker 0: Well I appreciate the as always kind and uplifting words of senator Herono. And I would also note that throughout her remarks, she still did not say a negative word about Antifa nor has any democrat here. They instead engage in a political game where they depend, you're welcome to say something negative about Antifa right now.
Speaker 1: I think that I've covered the subject quite well.
Speaker 0: You have listened. Okay. She declined to speak. So that is the position of the Democratic Party. I would note also that of the seven Democratic senators who spoke, not a one of them apologized for or denounced multiple Democrats calling law enforcement officers Nazis, stormtroopers, Geschappa, to be fair.
I don't I have not heard the word Nazi, but stormtrooper was Nancy Pelosi, and Geschappa was another Democratic leader.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Democrats were looting the treasury - Plain and simple. https://t.co/3zyjrPzSyb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disbelief that the Department of Energy under the Biden administration disbursed $93 billion in 76 days between President Trump's election and President Biden taking office. The speaker confirms with an interviewee that these funds were given to entities lacking business plans and financials. The speaker characterizes this as "distasteful" and "confidence undermining."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's rare that I'm speechless, but I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right? It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining.
So you're telling me that the Department of Energy in the seventy six day period before their boss was gonna leave office gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials? Correct. My god.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
They were already in the capital January 6th. @Skriptkeeper17 https://t.co/4EqJw45Qzu
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the other room, accessible through the door where the feet are, there's a glass floor that can drop someone into a room below if broken. The other room also has two doors: one at the rear and one to the right upon entry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the floor plan? Okay. Hey, guys. I've been in the other room. Lift it to me.
In the other room on the other side of this door, right here where these feet are standing. There is a glass that if somebody is getting broken, you can drop down into a room underneath it. There's also two doors in the other room. One in the rear and one to the right when you go in. So
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Is Islam About to Take Over Texas? https://t.co/SgGBgFlh6H
Video Transcript AI Summary
A proposed 402-acre "Epic City" is planned by the East Plano Islamic Center in Texas, featuring over 1,000 homes, a school, college, retail, and a mosque. Concerns are raised about the development being a Muslim-only space, despite claims it will be open to all. It is argued that large, dedicated Islamic areas pose a threat, referencing "no-go zones" in Europe where Islamic values allegedly supersede Western laws.
The speaker suggests this development is part of a larger trend of replacing Americans with foreigners holding different values and accuses Muslims of seeking to implement Sharia law. While acknowledging "good" individual Muslims, the speaker focuses on "institutional Islam" and its perceived conquest values.
Governor Abbott is quoted discussing potential violations related to the development, including misleading investors, fair housing violations, and building permits. The speaker believes the governor is not addressing the core issue, which is the development of a Muslim-only community. The speaker questions why this is not being built in a Muslim country and hopes Texas will stop the development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna lead with a story that has been bubbling up for quite some time, and it's happening in the great state of Texas. It's a little bit of a third rail topic. Some people would say it's politically incorrect. You're not allowed to talk about it. You're not allowed to dive into why this is happening.
That sounds like a perfect story for the Charlie Kirk show. When I first read it, I'll be honest, I didn't believe it. I said, ah, this sounds like it's being exaggerated. Some people are trying to get clicks, but the more I studied it and the more I researched it, the more real it is. Now the story actually harmonizes with the tragic news of the death of my friend David Horowitz.
And David Horowitz passed away yesterday, a legend who warned his entire career that if you keep on importing Muslims and Mohammedans, they're going to try and create their own communities that are not welcome with western values. They are going to try to implement Sharia, and that Western civilization is incompatible with Islam. That was his main contention. And we'll play some pieces of tape from David Horowitz later in the show. He is a legend of a man, truly.
So what's going on in Texas of all places? Mind you, this is not New York. This is not California. This is Texas. And as you know, Texas Republicans are rather weak at times.
They don't really know how to fight. Well, Muslims in Texas are looking to build their own epic city city. Literally, it's called epic city. The East Plano Islamic Center, deep in the heart of Texas. It's it's in the Northeast Suburbs of Dallas.
The plan right now is for for these Mohammedans to build a 402 acre community in the Dallas suburbs. For reference, that's about four times the size of Disneyland. It would have over 1,000 homes, a k through 12 school, a college, retail stores, and, of course, a mosque. Now let me pause here. When's the last time Christians decided to do this?
Christians should build communities like this. I look at the master plan here and I say, despite the fact that their worldview is toxic and that they want to destroy the West, you gotta give them respect. It's well designed. It's well configured. They're here to spread their value system to the West.
And we're like, oh, well, you know, religious freedom. Really? Is did the founding fathers have in mind Mohammedans coming to the great state of Texas or one of our states to build an exclusive city for Muslims? The idea is that this would all be on private property, so it could exist as a dedicated Islamic area. Developers claim the area will be open to all, which of course is rubbish, though we know and we get the feeling anybody moving in would find themselves not very welcome.
America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank. Large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America. We've seen how this unfolds in Europe. There are massive huge no go zones in major European cities in Britain and in France and in Sweden. Those are real.
You're not allowed to talk about them, but they are real. The police stay out of things. In no go zones, Islamic values reign supreme. Blasphemy laws, for example. If you dare question the prophet Muhammad, they will come after you.
Free speech is not an Islamic value. Free expression is not an Islamic value. Exact it's actually the exact opposite. Submission is an Islamic value. That's literally what Islam means.
Islam has conquest values. They seek to take over land and territory, and Europe is now a conquered continent. It is not what it used to be. It's a husk of its former self, which is increasingly Mohammedan. So what are core Islamic values?
Again, look at what happens when you run under Sharia law. And remember, under Islam, it is a requirement that believers try to get their societies to run on Sharia law. There are other takeaways here. The fact that this is even a possibility shows how our leaders, including Republicans in Texas, have for decades facilitated the great replacement of Americans with foreigners who hold dramatically and drastically different values. If your enemies are dumb enough to let you in, then you go in and you gradually build your numbers until you dominate them.
Why are we putting up with this? Do we really need an extra half a million people coming in to build their own Islamic city? One of which the architect behind it said, I'm gonna read the quote here, that this is going to be a Muslim only space, then he had to backpedal that a little bit. Now this is getting a lot of attention. Now we were fed the line about America saying, well, they're gonna assimilate.
Instead, they're building Islamic cities. And I say this as somebody who actually my primary care doctor is Muslim. I know plenty of good Muslims. We're not talking about individual Muslims that are good people. Instead, I'm talking about institutional Islam.
Of course, there are good individual Muslims. We all know them. They can be sweet. They can be charitable. They can be honoring.
I trust him so much with my own personal health. And doctor Zootie Jasser has assimilated, in fact, so much so he speaks out against stuff like this. He's trying to lead a reformation with an Islam, and good luck with that as I always tell him. I I hope you are successful. It's very rare.
He has very different values from a lot of Muslims, doctor Zudie Jassef. In fact, we're gonna have him on the program again soon to talk about this, and he speaks out against Hamas. He speaks against Iran. He is a model of what I hope more American Muslims would be. We are not seeing that in the West though.
He is a rarity. He is an exception. Instead, we see the further radicalization of Muslims that come to the West. They don't assimilate. Has Elon Omar assimilated to America?
No. Ilan Omar has instead tried to infect The United States America with her radical anti American Mohammedism amongst her extreme leftist beliefs. Let's go to cut three forty eight. This is governor Greg Abbott. This is the all Muslim city in Texas being built with no building permits.
And we're just saying, well, we can't stop it because religious freedom, it's a bunch of rubbish. This is a conquering ideology to take over the West, whether by sword or whether by development. And, yes, Muslims have a lot of babies, and their their clever tactic is to continue slowly envelop the West. Play Cut 348.
Speaker 1: There appear to be multiple violations that have taken place here. One is information has been provided to investors, that appears to be misleading. Another is they appear to be in violation of fair housing laws. Also, found that, you know, they they talk about doing all this building, but they don't have any building permits to actually do any building, and they have challenges even getting those building permits. Believe this or not, we've even received information that they may have been conducting a funeral home without legal authority.
Bottom line, Laurie, is that there are so many questions arose, especially information that we received that led us to need to call the elite Texas rangers to conduct a criminal investigation to find out if criminal laws in Texas have been violated.
Speaker 0: That's a pretty good answer by governor Abbott, but, of course, he's he's not getting down to the core of it. I get it. He's the governor of a big state. He's gotta be political. I I actually think he's doing a pretty good job on this to his credit, but I can say stuff that he's he can't say.
I'm not the governor of a big state. And so let me just tell you plainly what he might be thinking. This is outrageous. Go assimilate. Go buy homes in Plano.
Don't go build your own private development of Muslim only communities with a mosque as the center. The details here are remarkable. In their own words, their own words, they said and by the way, there's a whole funding model as there's a recreational center. There's a senior center. This is a Muslim only community.
And I'm gonna read this here. Yazir Qadi has emphasized that this will be a Muslim neighborhood, but now he had to backpedal say, oh, it's gonna be well integrated. Oh, really? Well integrated. What example do you have with that?
Why don't you go build this in Riyadh? Go build this in Lebanon, not in Plano. Go go make the Middle East great again. Oh, because you want as like a parasitic force to take over the West. Got it.
How's that working for Europe?
Speaker 1: I
Speaker 0: sure hope Texas has the stones to stop it.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
This is pretty good!! https://t.co/YWOovt4ukA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 challenges others to prove their claims are false, promising to apologize if proven wrong. Speaker 1 accuses the other side of hypocrisy, citing President Biden's alleged "blanket pardon" for his son and questioning their sudden concern for corruption. They criticize the Democratic Party's ties to figures like George Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates, and "every woke, weird pervert in Hollywood." The speaker asserts that the Republican Party, under President Trump, has a clear mandate from voters who rejected the policies of the other side, including "open borders," a "failing economy," "raging inflation," and "woke stuff." They yield their time, expressing disbelief at the conversation initiated by the other side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, like, I I don't know what you have to hide because we lying according to y'all. We lying. So prove us to be liars. I will sit here, and I will be the first one to say, I apologize. So let's go ahead and do it.
Will you do that?
Speaker 1: We do. I I find it rich that the other side of the aisle is suddenly concerned about corruption and ethics. Whenever president Biden just gave his son a ten year blanket pardon for foreign influence peddling and whatever else he was doing while high on whatever drugs with whatever prostitutes. I also find it rich that all of the sudden the other side has some problem with successful businessmen being in involved in politics whenever you guys are the party of George Soros, of Bill and Melinda Gates, of Sheryl Sandberg, of Mackenzie Bezos, of Taylor Swift, of so many other billionaires across the country, as well as every woke, weird pervert in Hollywood. I find this incredibly disingenuous.
I think the reality is that the Republican Party under president Trump has a very clear mandate from voters, and you guys don't like it because voters rejected everything you stand for and every policy that you've shoved down the American people's throats over the past four years, whether it's open borders, a failing economy, raging inflation, this weird woke stuff that you guys have been shoving down our children's throats. And the voters rejected you, and they welcomed our party. So with that, I yield my time, but I I find this this conversation incredibly rich from from the other side.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 denies being a white nationalist, racist, sexist, or anti-gay. Speaker 0 challenges others to name one racist thing they've said or done. Speakers 1 and 2 accuse Speaker 0 of enabling racists like Candace Owens. Speaker 0 questions if Candace Owens is a racist.
Speaker 2 criticizes Speaker 0 for wearing a shirt with a "rapist" on it, possibly referring to a Supreme Court Justice. Speaker 2 claims Speaker 0 is bringing hate to campus. Speaker 0 accuses others of hatred, citing name-calling. Speaker 2 alleges people have been assaulted because of Speaker 0's organization and that their organization's material was ripped down during student government elections.
Speaker 0 claims that calling them a racist cheapens real racism. Speaker 0 denies enabling racists, and when asked to name one, Speaker 3 lists Candace Owens, Larry Elder, Ben Carson, and Stacey Dash. Speaker 0 questions how they can be racist if they hosted a young black leadership summit. Speaker 3 says Speaker 0 would stop being racist when they stop enabling racists. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 3 of making a racist statement and threatens to press charges after being assaulted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I will say this. I'm I'm fearful that there's too many people in this country that will resort to this, but I am hopeful that we had a good conversation. I would all agree with that. I'm none of the things that that sign says, white nationalist, racist, sexist, anti gay. But you know what's really sickening?
Is there are racists out there. You. What have I ever said that's racist? Name one thing.
Speaker 1: You've enabled people to
Speaker 0: Name one.
Speaker 1: About racism and by enabling people
Speaker 2: and giving them a platform
Speaker 0: Like who? Like Candace Owens? Exactly. You Oh, Candace Owens is a racist.
Speaker 2: And you're the one who's gonna talk.
Speaker 0: Name one thing I've ever done that's racist.
Speaker 2: I don't have to speak to you anymore than I have to, but the fact that
Speaker 1: you're talking to these people with such hate, you're going completely against what you're saying. I'm the hateful one where
Speaker 0: they say f Chuck and
Speaker 2: saying nothing. They're saying nothing and you're attacking them.
Speaker 0: No. The signs talk for their hatred.
Speaker 2: Okay. And so does your justice shirt with the rapist
Speaker 0: on it. Does it bother you who's on the supreme court? Does that trigger you?
Speaker 2: The fact that you're wearing a rape apologist shirt
Speaker 0: and He never raped anybody nor was he ever accused of rape.
Speaker 2: Whatever the you need to stop talking. Hi. Hey, mom. And you're
Speaker 0: Why do I need to stop talking?
Speaker 2: You're bringing hate to this campus and there was none before.
Speaker 0: Love and unity and conversation and agreement and pictures with Democrats, which I love. You're this is the hatred. Calling people racist man babies. There are real racist Can
Speaker 2: I You had people been assaulted because of your organization?
Speaker 0: No one's been assaulted because of
Speaker 2: the state. What about that? What do you have to say about that? Silence.
Speaker 0: What do you mean? We have an event we have an event there tonight.
Speaker 2: No. Because of the student government election, your organization on campus had it ripped. Yeah. You look away from me because you know it's the truth.
Speaker 0: I So I'll allow our student members to talk about it. But I will say this. There are real racists in the world. And when you call people like me a racist, it cheapens real racism. Because everybody then becomes a racist.
I have zero there's zero evidence that I'm a racist. You've enabled racist. That makes you racist. Like Candace Owens. You've enabled racist.
Like Larry Elder. The only name that you doctor Ben Carson, like Stacy Dash. Doctor Ben Carson. Yeah. Doctor Ben Carson.
Oh, You've been a racist who's a black head of Housing Urban Development.
Speaker 3: Development. Because being black really makes you really anti racist. What helps? Okay. Mister, I hate identity politics.
Speaker 0: Would a racist coast the nation's largest young black leadership summit? Yes. Oh, okay. That makes a lot of sense. So at what point would I not be a racist then?
Speaker 3: When you stop enabling racist. Name one. All of your supporters. All of these mother
Speaker 0: people are racist? That's an unbelievably racist thing to say. Woah. Woah. That's assault.
Are you serious? I do wanna press charges, by the way. We're gonna press charges against him.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Holy crap!! One TRILLION American taxpayer dollars were stolen during the pandemic & 70% PERCENT of that money went overseas. This is unreal!! https://t.co/Be4R6kwCCL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks for examples of how taxpayer dollars are funding transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, and adversarial nations like North Korea, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, and Russia.
Speaker 1 states that during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen, with 70% going overseas. In one Western state, unemployment insurance applications exceeded the number of adults. Romanian criminals used stolen funds to facilitate fraud schemes involving fentanyl and attempts to impact democracy. While most public servants are honest, data and technology are needed to identify insider threats. Recent examples include a $50 million Medicaid theft in a Western state within four months. These thefts are attributed to organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizationals, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars. Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
Speaker 1: Got it. Yeah. So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, one trillion dollars was stolen. 70% of that money went overseas. And I can give you some examples.
In a western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18. The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy. On the insider threat, right, the the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals. But there are some, and what you need is data and technology to root that out. There were examples during the pandemic.
There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern in a Western state and stole $50,000,000 in less than four months. So you have to have these controls in place. Right? These aren't individuals stealing, mister Cloud. These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
DOGE member, Ethan, says he dropped out of Harvard to serve his country. Now most of campus hates him... https://t.co/U1IAY9iA6W
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker dropped out of Harvard to serve their country, resulting in lost friendships and widespread dislike on campus. They hope people will realize reform is genuinely needed. The speaker believes that the people they are addressing have a real shot at success, noting their dedication and work ethic, working until 2 AM every day of the week.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country. And it's been unfortunate to see, you know, lost friendships. Most of campus hates me now. But I I think fundamentally, I I hope people realize through conversations like this that reform is genuinely needed. And if there's one I think this is important to say.
If there's one group of people who really have a shot of success, it's the people here. You know, they're up until 2AM, Monday through Sunday. Those should not recognize weekends.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
He's Back And He's Pissed!!! https://t.co/9a3ynM6tFr
Video Transcript AI Summary
A corrupt group within the American government weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies to thwart the will of the American people. Fifty-one intelligence agents lied about Hunter Biden's laptop, claiming it came from Russia when they knew it came from his bedroom. They spied on his campaign, launched disinformation operations, persecuted his family, staff, and supporters, and raided Mar-a-Lago. These radicals tried to turn America into a corrupt communist and third-world country.
The speaker insists on full accountability for these abuses, promising a far-reaching investigation into the corruption of the system. On day one, the speaker signed an executive order banning government censorship and directing the removal of bureaucrats who attacked free speech. The administration stripped security clearances from intelligence agents who lied about Hunter Biden's laptop and from Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Leticia James, and their law firms. The clearances of the Biden crime family and Joe Biden himself were terminated. The speaker pardoned hundreds of political prisoners, removed senior FBI officials, and fired James Comey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But first, we must be honest about the lies and abuses that have occurred within these walls. Unfortunately, in recent years, a corrupt group of hacks and radicals within the ranks of the American government obliterated the trust and goodwill built up over generations. They weaponized the vast powers of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies to try and thwart the will of the American people. You remember the 51 intelligence agents that said as an example that Hunter Biden's laptop from hell came from Russia when they knew it came right from his bedroom. They knew that.
It was a big lie, and they knew it so well. They spied on my campaign, launched one hoax and disinformation operation after another, broke the law on a colossal scale, persecuted my family, staff, and supporters, raided my home, Mar A Lago, and did everything within their power to prevent me from becoming the president of The United States with the help of radicals like Mark Elias, Mark Pomerantz. And these are people that nobody's ever seen anything like it. It's so many others, but these are people that are bad people, really bad people. They tried to turn America into a corrupt communist and third world country.
But in the end, the thugs failed and the truth won. Freedom won. Justice won. Democracy won. And above all, the American people won.
There could be no more heinous betrayal of American values than to use the law to terrorize the innocent and reward the wicked. And that's what they were doing at a level that's never been seen before. And it's exactly what you saw with Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, their cronies to do the building of the last four years. They ripped what they've ripped down is incalculable, but what you're gonna build up is likewise something that will be breaking all sorts of records. They set loose violent criminals while targeting patriotic parents at school board meetings.
They dropped charges against Antifa and Hamas supporters while labeling traditional Catholics as domestic terrorist Catholics. We did very well with the Catholic vote, so I wanna thank them for that. They imported. They really did. Record numbers.
I would say, what's with the Catholics? They're really after the Catholics. So I don't know. They were after a lot of people. Maybe they didn't even know why.
They imported illegal alien murderers, drug dealers, and child predators from all over the world to come into our country while putting elderly Christians and pro life activists on trial for singing hymns and for saying prayers. They went to jail for that. Our predecessors turned this Department of Justice into the Department of Injustice, but I stand before you today to declare that those days are over and they are never going to come back. They're never coming back. So now as the chief law enforcement officer in our country, I will insist upon and demand full and complete accountability for the wrongs and abuses that have occurred.
The American people have given us a mandate, a mandate like few people thought possible. We won every single swing state. We won the popular vote by millions and millions of people. We won districts, 2,750. Think of that, 2,750 districts compared to 505.
So we want it at levels that have, I don't believe, ever seen before. That's the one where you see the map of The United States, and it's all red. Red for Republican, not for communist. Red for Republican. They would like it to turn red for communist, but it didn't work out that way.
The American people have given us a mandate and really a far a far reaching investigation is what they are demanding into the corruption of our system. And that's exactly, I'm sure, what Pam and Cash and everyone else mentioned here and not mentioned is going to be doing. We will expel the rogue actors and corrupt forces from our government. We will expose and very much expose their egregious crimes and severe misconduct of which was levels you've never seen anything like it. It's gonna be legendary.
It's gonna also be legendary for the people that are able to seek it out and bring justice. We will restore the scales of justice in America, and we will ensure that such abuses never happen again in our country. And that's why on day one, I signed an executive order banning all government censorship and directing the removal of every bureaucrat who conspired to attack free speech and many other things and values in America. My administration stripped the security clearances of the disgraced intelligence agents who lied about Hunter Biden's laptop from hell. We revoked the clearances of deranged Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Leticia James, and the crooked law firms that aided their partisan persecutions.
And I went through it. These are state and city courts, and the corruption is unbelievable. We also terminated the clearances of the Biden crime family and Joe Biden himself. He didn't deserve it. In fact, he was essentially found guilty, but they said he was incompetent.
And therefore, let's not find him guilty, I guess. Nobody knows what that ruling was, but I didn't want any part of it. I think I would have rather been found guilty than what they found with him. They said he didn't know what the hell he was doing, and therefore, he's let him go. I said, you know, I'd rather be convicted, Pam.
I think that that that was not I said, please convict me. Don't say that. I pardoned hundreds of political prisoners who had been grossly mistreated. We removed the senior FBI officials who misdirected resources to send SWAT teams after grandmothers and j six hostages. And I it was a great honor for me to fire, I will tell you this, a great honor to fire James Comey.
A great, great honor. That was nothing. There was no better day.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
"It was a mistake for China to retaliate" https://t.co/AFlHO2u8Ny
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump believes China wants and has to make a deal with the U.S., and that China made a mistake in retaliating. Because of this retaliation, 4% tariffs on China will go into effect tonight at midnight. Trump believes China doesn't know how to start the deal-making process. If China reaches out to make a deal, Trump will be incredibly gracious, but he's going to do what's best for the American people. When asked under what conditions Trump might consider lowering tariffs on China, the speaker stated it would be imprudent to say.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned the 70 countries or so. I'm curious though, under what conditions at this point would president Trump talk to president Xi about tariffs?
Speaker 1: Look. I just spoke to the president about this, and he believes that China wants to make a deal with The United States. He believes China has to make a deal with The United States. It was a mistake for China to retaliate. The president when when America is punched, he punches back harder.
That's why there will be 104% tariffs going into effect on China tonight at midnight. But the president believes that Xi and China want to make a deal. They just don't know how to get that started. And the president also wanted me to tell all of you that if China reaches out to make a deal, he'll be incredibly gracious, but he's going to do what's best for the American people.
Speaker 0: So China has to call first?
Speaker 1: The Chinese want to make a deal. They just don't know how to do it, but the president will, be implementing these 4% tariffs on China tonight.
Speaker 0: What conditions might he consider lowering tariffs on China at this point?
Speaker 1: It would be imprudent of me to tell you those conditions here from the podium.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
I Fact-Checked Trump's Claims About Waste Found by DOGE... and Oh Boy - Bill O'Reilly https://t.co/hgZIctck2M
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the new Department of Government Efficiency, potentially led by Elon Musk. They investigated four instances of wasteful spending that Donald Trump mentioned.
$22 billion from Health and Human Services went to housing and transportation for documented migrants. $60 million went to indigenous peoples and Afro-Colombian empowerment in Central America via USAID, with unclear results. $32 million went to the Republic of Moldova for a left-wing propaganda operation, also via USAID. $42 million went to Johns Hopkins University for behavior change in Uganda, funded by USAID.
Trump claimed $25 billion in waste. A Rasmussen poll shows that 59% of Americans support auditing Social Security, and 61% believe an audit would reveal widespread fraud. 55% are confident they'll receive promised Social Security benefits. 43% trust Democrats more to handle Social Security, while 44% trust Republicans. The speaker questions whether Democrats will watch spending.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doge. Okay. So this is another polarizing thing. Alright? So the Department of Government Efficiency is new.
Trump set it up. Elon Musk in charge. Elon is a hotshot. Okay? He's a polarizing guy.
So I asked myself, I said, look. Let's find four things that Donald Trump said were wasteful, and he spent three minutes and seventeen seconds running down about 20 of them. Pick four let's put four at random, which I did I did it, and see if it's true or not. That's pretty good. Right?
That's a fair assessment. First one, 22,000,000,000 from health and human services department to provide free housing and cars, transportation from documented migrants. That is true. According to Open the Books, which is, monitors government spending. That's true.
Second one, 60,000,000 American taxpayer dollars for indigenous peoples and Afro Colombian empowerment in Central America. USAID supervised that. It's true. No one knows where the money went. 60,000,000 went to Colombia.
Where is it? What did it do? That's why the USAID was closed down? Third one, the Republic of Moldova, which is near Ukraine, received $32,000,000 from The USA to promote a left wing propaganda operation. True.
And again, this was under USAID. Why? Why would you spend that money? Alright. And the final 1, 40 2 million for behavior change in Uganda.
True. Now this money was given to Johns Hopkins University in a grant form by the USAID. Well, what kind of behavior changed in Uganda? For American dollars, 42,000,000. What?
I'm sure Johns Hopkins got a reason. It's a very fine school. Now right at this point, the waste that Donald Trump mentioned last night stands at $25,000,000,000. It's a lot of money. Alright?
It's quarter of a trillion. And you haven't even gone into the Pentagon or the Department of Education, which are two enormous, okay, wasters of money. So I like this doge. Right? Do you not want this?
Democrats don't want it? They don't wanna know. They just wanna send money to Moldova and Uganda. Why? Never an answer.
Oh, well, we do a lot of good over there. Yeah. Alright. New poll Rasmussen about Doge. Majority of Americans support it.
Fair poll. First question. Would you support or oppose having Department of Government efficiency do an audit of Social Security? Support 59. Total oppose 35.
Now Donald Trump made a big deal out of this. So there's all kinds of fraud in social security payments. We'll see if we can back that up, but folks want to see it. How likely is it that an audit of social security would reveal widespread fraud? Total likely 61 unlikely 33.
Third question, how confident are you the Social Security system will pay you all the promised benefits? Confident 55, not confident 41. Final question, which political party you trust more to handle Social Security? Democrats, forty three. Republicans, forty four.
Well, Democrats will handle Social Security, but will they watch spending? No. They will not. Biden proved it. Okay.
Once again, last night, Trump said that Biden was the worst president in our history. Second.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Newt Nails It https://t.co/dJZo6vjmFf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats face challenges as Trump and Musk question government funding sources that have supported them for decades, threatening their coalition's ability to operate through patronage. A significant portion of the Democratic party holds secular religious beliefs, such as in transgenderism and open borders, preventing them from rational analysis and leading them to support unpopular positions. Congress was aware of misspent funds but provided obscure answers to oversight inquiries. A "lobbyist bureaucratic empire" misused public funds, favoring friends regardless of competence. Trump is challenging the establishment in a way unseen since FDR, unlike Reagan, who didn't confront the American establishment. The public will support Trump as they realize how bad the situation is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are two different things going on here with the Democrats. The first is they are watching with terror as all the different sources of government money that has propped them up for the last sixty or seventy years, all of it is now being challenged by president Trump and by Elon Musk. I mean, this cuts at the very base of their coalition. And if they can't bribe people, if they can't act corruptly, if they can't take care of their friends, their entire coalition's gonna collapse. Second, you have a very large part of the Democratic party for whom the beliefs you were describing, transgenderism, for example, are religious beliefs.
This is a secular religion. They can't unlock because they believe these things. They believe in an open border. They believe that there really is no such thing as America. They believe that it's really good to have millions of people flood into this country.
It's really good to have people who don't have to work, That work requirements are inherently bad. All of these things are are a semi religious or religious belief system, and that's why they can't unlock. They can it's not rational. They can't sit down and do a common sense analysis. They're instead trapped into being for things that are profoundly unpopular with most Americans.
Speaker 1: There's an untold story behind this money too because congress has a duty called oversight, And there were senators and and congress people that were asking USAID, for example, and other departments for an accounting of their money. They would get back nebulous, obscure, obtuse answers, which tells me that the Democrats knew what they were doing. They knew the American people would not want their money spent this way, but they did it anyway. And then they basically lied to the American people and and would not disclose the true nature of the spending that was actually going on.
Speaker 0: Look. I mean, you have to accept that there was a lobbyist bureaucratic empire, that that empire took your money, gave it to its friends even if they were totally incompetent, and then you'll find case after case where your money went out to systems that just don't work. They're that's crazy. And at that time, they were taking care of themselves. What makes president Trump potentially the most consequential president since Abraham Lincoln is the fact Yeah.
That he's taking a sledgehammer, and he is pounding the establishment in a way that no one has since Franklin Roosevelt created it in the nineteen thirties. He's the first person, and I've been a great fan of Ronald Reagan. Reagan defeated the Soviet empire, but he didn't try to take on the American establishment. Trump has had the guts to go straight at it, and I think the American people are gonna be with him even even more so when they learn how really sickeningly bad it is.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 and the mainstream media of covering for a "vicious gang" that has taken the lives of American women. Speaker 1 claims individuals can be classified based on tattoos and streetwear, leading to deportation to El Salvador. Speaker 0 refutes this, stating the Department of Homeland Security and its agents use a "litany of criteria" to ensure individuals qualify as "foreign terrorists" for deportation. Speaker 0 asserts the president authorized a mass deportation campaign targeting "illegal criminal aliens" and defends the credibility of agents risking their lives, while Speaker 1 questions their credibility. Speaker 0 repeats the accusation of covering for a "vicious gang."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shame on you and shame on the mainstream media for trying to cover for these individuals. I'm trying to cover anyone. This is a vicious gang, Andrew. This is a vicious gang that has taken the lives of American women.
Speaker 1: You can get classified by simply having certain symbols in your tattoos and wearing certain street wear brands. That alone is enough to get someone classified as TDA and sent to El Salvador.
Speaker 0: That's not true.
Speaker 1: To this document, it is
Speaker 0: no according to the Department of Homeland Security. And the agents. Have you talked to the agents who have been putting their lives on the line? To detain these? Foreign terrorists?
Who have been terrorizing our communities? TDA is a vicious gang that has taken the lives of American women. And our agents on the front lines. Take. Deporting these people with the utmost seriousness.
And there is a litany of criteria that they use. To ensure that these individuals qualify as foreign terrorists. And to ensure. To ensure that they qualify for deportation. And the president made it incredibly clear to the American public that there would be mass deportation campaign of not just foreign terrorists, but also illegal criminal aliens who have been wreaking havoc on American communities and shame on you and shame on the mainstream media for trying to cover for these individuals.
This is a vicious gang, Andrew. This is a vicious gang that has taken the lives of American women.
Speaker 1: The government filed in court, which says all
Speaker 0: the you said yourself there are there are eight criteria on that document. And you are questioning the credibility of these agents who are putting their life on the line to protect your life and the life of everybody in this group and everybody across the country. Their credibility should be questioned. They finally have a president who is allowing them to do their jobs and God bless them for doing it.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Ted Cruz Bringing It https://t.co/RCT1h30we1
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a hearing, a senator questions a judge about a case involving a male convicted of raping a nine-year-old boy and a seventeen-year-old girl, and later convicted of possessing child pornography. The senator challenges the judge's decision to allow this individual, now identifying as female, to be housed in a women's prison. The senator accuses the judge of prioritizing political ideology over the safety and rights of the female inmates, highlighting the judge's statement that the individual was "entirely a female" despite having male genitalia. The senator quotes the judge's order, where she stated there were "no signs that petitioner is at risk of re offending" and deemed concerns about potential trauma to female inmates as "overblown." The judge defends her decision, stating the petitioner had not engaged in violence while in custody, and wardens requested the transfer due to medical needs. She claims the denial of transfer by the transgender executive council was based on hormone levels, which she found to be a pretext.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In your court, what matters more? The rights of individuals or your political ideology.
Speaker 1: I apply the law to the facts.
Speaker 0: I I asked question. Which matters more?
Speaker 1: Well, my political ideology doesn't matter at all.
Speaker 0: K. So I don't believe you. And I think this case demonstrates that you are willing to subjugate the rights of individuals to satisfy your political ideology. This case involves a male defendant who raped a nine year old boy. Was he guilty of that?
Yes.
Speaker 1: The petitioner plead guilty to that.
Speaker 0: K. So he raped a nine year old boy. He also raped a 17 year old girl. Was he guilty of that?
Speaker 1: He plead guilty. The petitioner plead guilty of that crime as well.
Speaker 0: So was he guilty?
Speaker 1: I I hope so because she plead guilty to it.
Speaker 0: He was a he when he did this. That's correct. And also criminal deviant conduct, which the record doesn't doesn't disclose what that was exactly. Then after serving in prison, mister McClain was released for parole, but then violated the terms of parole by having Internet and was sent back to prison. One year after being released again, was convicted of having child pornography.
Is that correct?
Speaker 1: I'm I'm unclear on exactly the time frame that you're at, but but the petitioner was convicted of distributing child pornography.
Speaker 0: Child pornography that was images of adults violently raping children.
Speaker 1: Abhorrent conduct.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: For which there are real victims.
Speaker 0: And this individual, six foot two, biologically a man, a minute ago you said that when this man decided that he was a she, you said this individual was quote, I wrote it down, sober and entirely a female. That phrase struck me as remarkable. Did this individual have male genitalia?
Speaker 1: I think what I said or at least what I
Speaker 0: That is a verbatim quote. Entirely a female.
Speaker 1: Sorry. What I meant to say was hormonally a
Speaker 0: female. Okay. But that's not entirely. Did this individual have male genitalia?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: So you took a six foot two serial rapist. Serial child rapist with male genitalia and he said, you know, I'd like to be in a women's prison. And your answer was that sounds great to me. Let me ask you something. The other women in that prison, do they have any rights?
Speaker 1: Is is that a question? Yes.
Speaker 0: The other women in that prison, do they have any rights?
Speaker 1: Of course.
Speaker 0: Do they have the right not to have a six foot two man who is a repeat serial rapist put in as their cell mate?
Speaker 1: Senator Cruz, I considered the facts presented to me and I reached a decision based on what the law
Speaker 0: I asked you a question. Do they have a right not to have a six foot two man who is a serial rapist put in as their cellmate? Do those women have a right to that?
Speaker 1: Every person who's incarcerated has the right to be safe in their space.
Speaker 0: But you didn't think so. You didn't think so. And in fact, I'm gonna give some quotes from your order because senator Kennedy is right. This is not a judge's order. This is a political activist.
By the way, the beginning of your order says, at birth, people are typically assigned a gender. I gotta say that would astonish a lot of Americans. A lot of Americans think you you you go to the hospital, a baby is born and you congratulations. You have a little boy, little girl. The assigned a gender, I know you went to Brown, but it sounds like it's in a college faculty lounge with no bearing on reality.
The bureau prison argued. What I'm saying right now that if you put this person in a female prison, there will be a risk of sexual assault to the women. And you know what you did? You said you didn't care about the women. I'm gonna quote what you wrote.
You wrote quote, the Bureau of Prisons claim pedagogical interest in protecting female prisoners from sexual violence and trauma. This interest is legitimate, that's kind of you to say. But there are no signs that petitioner is at risk of re offending. The record is devoid of evidence of incidents of violence or assault during petitioner's incarceration when she was the perpetrator, only the victim. A theoretical risk of sexual assault by the prisoner without more cannot support the BOP's position.
No evidence theoretical. Have you dealt in what universe is someone who is a serial repeat child rapist not at a risk of re offending?
Speaker 1: Senator, as I do in every case.
Speaker 0: I know you've been told to repeat the line, I follow the law. I asked a question. In what universe is someone who is a serial repeat child rapist not at risk of re offending?
Speaker 1: Sir, I looked at the facts that were before me in this case. All of the evidence including the statements of every warden who had supervised this petitioner.
Speaker 0: You also wrote, the BOP also posits that permitting petitioner to live among women will be traumatizing and possibly dangerous to them. This concern is overblown. I have to say, if I were the father of one of those women, and you decided that my daughter's cell mate was gonna be a six foot two man who over and over and over again committed violent sexual assault. I would say the entire justice system is absurd and it is clear on your record, your political ideology matters a heck of a lot more than the rights of those women that you endangered. I think you're a radical and I think you have no business being a judge.
Speaker 1: Judge Ned.
Speaker 2: Judge Nedburn, there was an opportunity during your exchange with senator Cruz that you were attempting to offer a response relative to the the conditions under which this petitioner were was unsafe in the facilities in which she was being held. I'd like to offer you the opportunity to finish that response.
Speaker 1: So the facts that were presented to me and what I relied on to make my decision were that the petitioner had engaged in no violence, no physical violence, no acts of sexual violence whatsoever while in custody. All three wardens who supervised the petitioner requested that she be transferred to a women's facility because of her serious medical needs. In addition, the Bureau of Prisons long time medical provider testified at a two day hearing in my courtroom, and recommended that the petitioner be transferred because of her serious medical needs. And the last thing I'll say is that the transgender executive council, which is the body that makes decisions on behalf of transgender transfer requests within the Bureau of Prisons, never said that the petitioner could not be transferred, and never ever said that she couldn't be transferred because of any risk of violence. What the transgender executive council repeatedly said in denying the request was simply that she needed to maintain her hormone levels.
That was the repeated justification for the denial of transfer. But the petitioner had reached full female hormone levels before even being incarcerated. At the time, the district judge in Indiana who sentenced the petitioner requested that she be placed in a women's facility. Her hormones were entirely female at that point. And so the decision by the transgender executive council to deny the transfer request based on this idea that it was only because her hormones needed to be consistent and stabilized.
I found was a pretext, but they never once said
Speaker 0: opposite of what she said. Your
Speaker 2: own reporters. Senators, I gave both of you more time to finish your line of questioning. I allowed the witness to finish her. I allowed the witness to finish witness I allow the witness to finish her. That is
Speaker 0: I understand that
Speaker 2: is not. I have said that.
Speaker 0: Madam chair. She has an obligation to explain why she directly contradicted what she wrote in her report. She says in her report, the Bureau of Prisons claimed pedagogical interest is in protecting female prisoners from sexual violence and trauma. She just told you Senator So, yes, you are afraid of the answer to that question.
Speaker 2: Senator Padilla. Before
Speaker 0: afraid of the answer to that question.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Kristi Noem: ICE raid leakers have been found, now facing 10 years in prison. https://t.co/nDAy3Bq4EW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Homeland Security has identified two individuals who leaked information about operations, endangering law enforcement lives. The department intends to prosecute these individuals and hold them accountable. The department will continue efforts to keep America safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone, I wanted to give you a quick update. We have identified two leakers of information here at the Department of Homeland Security who have been telling individuals about our operations and putting law enforcement lives in jeopardy. We plan to prosecute these two individuals and hold them accountable for what they've done. And we're going to continue to do all that we can to keep America safe.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Liberals don't realize that when they talk about 'eating the rich' they are talking about 'eating' fellow liberals. https://t.co/T6ZZzCE2gR
Video Transcript AI Summary
For every billionaire who backed Trump, Kamala Harris had two. Democrats represent nine of the 10 richest US counties, and 65% of Americans making over $500,000 annually are Democrats. 75% of hedge fund managers' political donations go to Democrats, as do 95% of donations from the top three management consulting firms.
Trump, on the other hand, resonated with Americans earning under $100,000. The speaker claims Democrats are now the party of the wealthy, while Trump represents the working class by adopting pro-worker policies Democrats abandoned to serve their rich base. The speaker views this as performance art, asserting that politicians are failing to serve the American people despite being paid to do so.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For every one billionaire that backed president Trump, Kamala Harris had two. Nine of the 10 richest counties in America are represented by Democrats. Sixty five percent of Americans making over $500,000 a year today are Democrats. Seventy five percent of hedge fund managers who make political donations donate to Democrats and 95% of political donations from the top three management consulting firms go to Democrats. Meanwhile, President Trump absolutely crushed with Americans who make under a hundred thousand dollars a year.
The Democrats are the party of the wealthy. And Donald Trump is representing the working class because he simply lifted the pro worker elements of the Democrats' agenda when they abandoned the working class to cater to their rich base. This is all performance art. And what's so upsetting about it is they are being paid by the American people to serve them, and they are doing nothing of the kind.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
This video was banned by TikTok https://t.co/twd334ZbHJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A TikTok video was banned for being controversial, hateful, and offensive. The video urges viewers to stand up for girls' and women's equality and sports, asserting that it is unfair and unsafe to allow males to compete in girls' sports.
The video encourages viewers to not be intimidated by accusations of bigotry and to reject the idea that they should be quiet or compliant. It claims women deserve their own sports, privacy, fairness, and safety, and a chance to compete and win. The speaker advocates for honesty and bravery in fighting for women's rights.
The video's banning is described as a sign of insane times where the undeniable truth of biological differences between men and women is deemed ban-worthy. The speaker calls for continued vigilance, truth-sharing, and support for those who speak out, referencing court rulings that are undoing the Biden administration's changes to Title IX.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard about this latest video that TikTok banned because they found it to be too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive?
Speaker 1: Well, if
Speaker 0: you haven't seen it yet, here it is. Brace yourself.
Speaker 1: If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up. If girls and women's sports matter and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up. If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls' sports because it's, well, obvious, Stand up. Don't be cowed by people who call you a bigot. You're not a bigot.
Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet. Sit down. Be nice. It's not nice to further a lie.
It's not mean to believe in women's equality. We deserve our
Speaker 0: own sports,
Speaker 1: privacy, fairness, safety. We deserve a chance to compete and win. So don't be nice. Don't be careful. Be honest.
Be brave. Fight for winning. We've come too far to give up now. And if you agree with that, stand up and stand with us.
Speaker 0: Crazy. Right? Not what you expected. It it's a sign of this insane time that we are living in where something that undeniably and objectively true, the biological differences between men and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok.
We have to keep our eyes open to what is going on and continue to lift our voices and not allow them to ban us from seeing this truth and from sharing this truth. There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo undo the Biden administration's destruction of title nine. We have to keep building the momentum, keep sharing the truth, speaking the truth, and supporting those who do.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
From Charlie Kirk: Dem Mayor Arrested on Over 50 Counts of Child Pornography Patrick Wojahn, the first openly gay member of College Park, MD- who was also a regular White House guest and Pete Buttigieg "mentee"- has just been arrested on 56 counts of child porn. https://t.co/dHXq25fVkC
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm reporting on the arrest of College Park, Maryland's Democrat Mayor, Patrick Wojahn, who faces 56 charges related to child pornography. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children alerted authorities after a social media account linked to Wojahn was found distributing suspected child pornography. Wojahn has since resigned.
This case is noteworthy because of his connections with prominent Democrats. While I don't want to assume guilt by association, the relationship warrants answers.
This arrest highlights a broader theme: society's role in protecting infants from predators. While everyone condemns this exploitation, we must also consider other forms of child exploitation, such as what's happening at gender-affirming clinics where children are undergoing life-altering procedures. Are we allowing other forms of child exploitation to happen in our communities?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democrat mayor in Maryland arrested on 56 child pornography related charges. The mayor of College Park, Maryland, Patrick Wojsan, was arrested Thursday on 56 child pornography possession and distribution charges. He's a gay activist, forty seven year old gay activist Democrat, faces 40 counts of possess it's hard to even read this, I'll be honest. It's so disgusting. It's vomit inducing, but it's real.
So if you don't have the stomach for this, then I apologize. Possession of exploitive child material and 16 counts of distribution of exploitive child material, a press release from the Prince George County Police Department said. Now the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children were first alerted that the department had a social media account operating with the with the within the county was distributing, quote, suspected child pornography on February 17, according to PGPD, and law enforcement deserves credit for working quickly and arresting a rather high profile Democrat, someone that is and we'll talk about this in a second. Someone that is off was awfully popular with Buttigieg and that whole, that whole cabal. Regular guest at the White House, all that.
And by the way, just so we're clear, at least 13 mayors in the last couple years have been arrested on child sex crimes since 02/2021. That's really strange, isn't it? So he resigned as mayor of College Park, Maryland. College Park, Maryland is where the University of Maryland is. Now why this story is noteworthy is that this is not just some random person.
This seems to be a buddy buddy with mayor Pete, one of mayor Pete's best friends. Has, mayor Pete spoke out against this? I haven't seen anything. This is, a close confidant, it seems. Multiple pictures.
In fact, in they called they they said it was a mentor mentee relationship. Multiple times that they're photographed together. Now I am going to push back against some of the rush to judgment where no way can we possibly do guilt by association. Did Pete Buttigieg know about this? Was he aware of this?
I I doubt it, to be honest. I I I don't wanna even speculate on that, but it does warrant an answer, which is, hey. This is someone that you were mentoring. Is this okay? And I think one of the reasons also this story deserves some attention is that it is part of a theme that we have highlighted on this program about the three types of people and the three types of people there are only three types of people in this particular categorization and what a society does to either elevate and protect those three types of people or really silence them.
There are infants. Infants, the type of people that this former mayor of College Park, unfortunately, was exploiting. There are the protectors of infants. That's all of us that believe that this is wrong and these people need to be put in prison and maybe even more than that. And then there are predators.
So human history shows us that you will always have infants and you will always have predators. There is no guarantee that you will have the protectors of infants. That's the question. The question is, do you have people that are neither infant nor predator, but they're in the middle? They're the normal regular people.
Do they have the courage? Do they have the conviction? Do they have the clarity of moral thought to do the right thing? And, you know, this particular mayor who has now been arrested was a up and coming, you know, star in the gay Democrat mayor community in 02/2019, a picture of him with Pete Buttigieg saying, just two mayors grabbing a beer together. Now without getting into the graphic details of the indictment, which I do not encourage you to read.
I had stop reading it. I x'd out. It was so disgusting. Don't even wanna talk about some of the details of it. Without going too deep into it, though, this the the alleged indictment shows that this was not some one off thing.
This was a sophisticated multi device effort that was being run-in a clandestine fashion by this sicko, the gay Democrat, Pat what's his name? I I said it earlier. Patrick Patrick Wojsin. Thank you. Wojsin.
And so there's a theme here. And all of us, obviously, everybody everybody who hears this immediately says, okay. That's that's wrong. But let me ask a a pointed question. What if I told you that there are other forms of child exploitation that are happening under the guise of gender affirming clinics?
So this story gets everybody upset, and it should. Okay. Even Democrats, they're not defending it nor nor should they. And I it's it's so outside of the pale. But they will defend this.
Put this up on screen. Show this. This is the number for in 02/2017, if we can get I don't know if we have it in the cut sheet or not, but let me just kinda illustrate it for those on radio and podcasts anyway while we get it. In 02/2017, there's a picture of how many pediatric gender clinics there were in two I'm sorry. 02/2007, not 02/2017.
In 02/2007, there were two. There was one in Virginia, and there was one, it looks like, in Boston. You look at the picture now in 02/2022, look at how many pediatric gender clinics there are in America today. Looks at least well over a hundred, easily well over a hundred from all across the country. One in Montana, one in Idaho, all over California, all over Florida, all over Texas.
What happened? In fifteen years, we went from a place where there were only two places in America to get your breasts chopped off, to get hysterectomies, to get Lupron administered, or to get other incredibly aggressive chemical castration, drugs and castration methods administered to you, procedures. Thank you. And now it's widespread, and it's everywhere. Part of it is the social media contagion that continues via TikTok and other means.
Part of it is a money grab as we learned as Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt came out and they said that there's an actual monetary incentive to do this, and that's because of the great exposure work of Matt Walsh who deserves just infinite amounts of credit. And now remember, you need these treatments for life. So once you cut off a girl's breasts at age 11, which is happening far too often I don't know the exact numbers. I it's at least in the thousands, but we can get the exact numbers. You're go you are now a pharmaceutical annuity patient for life because you're not anymore what your DNA or your biology dictates.
So you have to keep on intervening with drugs, and then you have to intervene with antidepressants, and then you have to intervene with other medication because you might gain weight because you're on and it starts these cascade of pharmaceutical interventions. And so while this story, democrat mayor arrested, is disgusting and awful, child exploitation, who would do such a thing? We have to ask ourselves the question, are we allowing other forms of child exploitation to happen in our state and in our community?
reSee.it AI Summary
The SDNY, which is currently concealing the Epstein files that expose crimes against children, also hid Anthony Weiner's laptop. This suggests they have been protecting pedophiles for years. Sidney Powell mentioned that New York police officers were so horrified by what they saw on that laptop that they were physically sick. Strong letters are not enough; we need immediate accountability, including perp walks and firings. It feels like our own FBI is covering up crimes against humanity. The truth must be revealed to the American people.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
The same SDNY that is now hiding the Epstein files that reveal crimes against children is also the SDNY that had possession of and hid Anthony Weiner's laptop. This means they have been running cover for the pedophiles for years. Sidney Powell claimed that when New York police officers saw some of the crimes on that laptop, they had to throw up in disgust. Strong letters will not suffice. We need perp walks and firing immediately. Our own FBI is running cover for the crimes against humanity. Release the truth to the American people.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would demand access to Anthony Weiner's laptop and have a trusted military expert analyze its contents for potential prosecutions. I've heard disturbing reports about the material on it.
Also, I've learned that the Southern District of New York has thousands of pages of documents related to Epstein. We will obtain all of these documents, redacting grand jury information and protecting confidential witnesses. The American people have a right to know, and as the most transparent president, I will ensure the release of the full Epstein files, as well as JFK and Martin Luther King files.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They specifically did not look at the BlackBerry backups, and they didn't look at a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop. So one of the things, if I were the president, I'd do is demand the Anthony Weiner laptop and get it to the most trusted person in the military to take apart everything on it and then start using it. There's a lot that can be prosecuted, I have no doubt, on that laptop. I heard that the New York police officers who saw some of it, even though they're hardened investigators, literally had to go throw up. It's bad.
Speaker 1: I'm assured that's it. Cash. Ask the same questions. Assured there's no more. Last I I found out, you know, this week that a source told me, New York, SDNY, they're sitting on thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein.
Thousands, thousands. And of course, you've seen the very strong letter. We will get everything. We will have it in our possession. We will redact it, of course, to protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses that the American people have a right to know.
And Donald Trump is the most transparent president in our nation's history. So not only will America get the full Epstein files, they will get JFK, they will get Martin Luther King.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
FAKE NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes caught fraudulently claiming deep state speech writer, Kristina Drye, was "USAID Employee" who was fired, as well as stating she was "Nonpartisan." BOTH CLAIMS ARE DEMONSTRABLY FALSE. https://t.co/A7oIp7JrcQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
60 Minutes is being called out for allegedly airing a fake news segment. They presented Christina Drey, as a sad, distraught former USAID employee supposedly fired by the Trump administration. However, Drey actually works for XLA and Jefferson Partners, providing speech writing services for USAID, and was previously Samantha Powers' speechwriter.
The segment portrayed Drey and another consultant as long-term USAID employees unfairly fired, but they were never direct employees. It was also discovered that Drey had a blog with nasty posts about Donald Trump and his supporters, even suggesting eliminating them.
Infowars needs money to keep going. Please go to infowarsstore.com and support us by buying products like Survival Shield iodine, Brain Force Ultra, Body's ultimate turmeric formula, Vitamin C with zinc, The last polling formula, Ultra twelve, Pain MD and The great awakening book and Infowars gold collectible art card.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From Gateway Pundit, fake news sixty Minutes star nonpolitical USAID worker is former deep state speechwriter, did not work for USAID, and even had a blog writing about eliminating Trump supporters. But you remember her face if you, watched on Monday. Sixty Minutes is quickly earning the reputation of being the most fake news of all fake outlets. Sixty Minutes is already in court defending their organization when they were caught cutting and pasting Kamala Harris' interview together to make it to make her look like a normal thinking person. Now this past weekend, sixty Minutes was caught again.
This time, trying to pass a former speechwriter for USAID chief Samantha Power as a sad and distraught former USAID employee who the Trump administration had recently fired. Sixty Minutes aired a segment about a sad young mother, Christina Drey, who was fired from USAID in Washington DC this month. Kristen Drey does not actually work for USAID. She works for XLA and Jefferson Partners, a company that provides speech writing services for USAID. She was also Samantha Powers' speech writer, that is the former head of the USAID.
The entire segment was complete BS. Let's go ahead and go to that segment now, and we'll we'll watch it just to remind you, of the lies that sixty minutes is very carefully crafting to deceive you. Let's watch.
Speaker 1: People are really scared. I think that, you know, twelve days ago, people knew where their next paycheck was coming from. They knew how they were gonna pay for their kids' day care, their medical bills, and then all gone overnight.
Speaker 2: All gone overnight for Christina Drey and Adam Dubard fired this month in the chaotic shutdown of foreign aid distributed by The US Agency For International Development. Interested. USAR. You're correct. Yeah.
Speaker 0: We can bring him bring him down. That that was the sob story they told. By the way, on the first day president Trump was in office, he canceled the Keystone XL pipeline. I don't seem to recall any sixty minute, exposes with, weeping oilfield workers about their jobs actually being eliminated even though they actually made things and would have helped this country. No.
What we get is the totally fraudulent sob story of a USAID speechwriter professional activist crying about the fact that she only got eight months severance if she ever worked there in the first place, which in fact, she didn't. These two comms consultants, these communication consultants, were never actually employees of USAID. They presented them as though they were long term employees who were fired for lack of loyalty. The reality is the exact opposite. And then Natalie Winters discovered that a young leftist, Christina Drey, had a blog where she wrote nasty, uneducated posts on Donald Trump and his supporters.
She even wrote about eliminating Trump supporters, saying, quote, you represent the problem we are trying to eliminate. You represent the privilege we keep talking about. Now these have been archived. So just I really hope you can fully take in the reality of what what we just told you. Right?
You've got these radical, vicious, extremist, far left activists being posed by sixty minutes, CBS News, as poor, beleaguered, trustworthy, unbiased, and just hardworking, your down home government bureaucrats, unfairly fired for lack of loyalty by this despotic president. It's all fraud. This is all a gigantic kabuki show they're putting on for us, and they really do need to be in prison for this.
Speaker 3: It's very simple. We need the money to keep this going right now. I mean, last week. So here's what we got. We got survival still next to the best greatest pure iodine out there.
We pioneered this. It it's it's incredible. Every electrochemical activity in the body, you need it. It's amazing. Brain Force Ultra, a fan favorite.
Great clean nootropic. Body's ultimate turmeric formula, the strongest turmeric out there. Amazing. Vitamin c with zinc, very strong. The last polling formula, thousand milligram organic vitamin c, rose hips, zinc, bazo beats, the nitric oxide.
Looks like nitric boost. Great for your heart. Cardiovascular cleans out your blood. Ultra twelve, purest, highest quality, grade b twelve. Pain MD is an amazing natural pain relief formula.
It is excellent. Also, the great awakening, my best selling number one New York Times bestseller, but they wouldn't say that. It was a big scandal. The Infowars gold collectible art card, there's some of those, and that's what's there. I mean, we are wrecking it, but less than one to the 1% of her buy anything, if you'll just go to infowarsstore.com, we will be able to keep fighting.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Zelensky is a Communist. That's why the Democrats love him. Listen to this: https://t.co/mvpIpHdD2W
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize their assets. This follows my 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, as well as taking control of Ukraine's largest television networks.
My presidential term ended on May 20th, but I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. Some may say this is acceptable because we are at war. But, consider the implications if we accept this rationale. Leaders in other countries may use the same excuse to suspend constitutions and cancel elections, especially considering the conflicts with Russia and China.
They are already conditioning people to accept a dictatorship by using the Department of Justice to target political opponents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is something that the political establishment and propaganda media don't want you to know. Ukraine's President Zelensky has just banned yet another political opposition party, one that questioned his legitimacy as president, and used Ukraine's Department Of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members' assets. Now this is just the latest of Zelenskyy's actions to do this sort of thing. He began banning major political opposition parties in 2022 when he also started banning TV channels that were associated with his political opponents. And he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks, now controlled by their government.
Zelensky's presidential term ended on May 20. He canceled elections in the name of martial law, suspending Ukraine's constitution so he could stay in power. Defenders of Zelensky will say, hey, Ukraine is in the middle of a war. They can't have elections. Just stop for a moment and think, if we accept that excuse or criteria for suspending the constitution and canceling elections, then we should presume that leaders in our own country and our own establishment media will also use the same excuse and rationale when they suspend our constitution and our elections, since we too are at war with Russia and China.
If you think this sounds crazy, look at what's already going on. They've already started conditioning us to accept a dictatorship by rationalizing their own use of our Department of Justice to target President Trump and other political enemies in their efforts to stay in power.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
BREAKING: President Trump's Secret Service Director, Sean Curran, is already cleaning house. Curran has already informed up to 10 senior agency officials that they will either get fired, demoted or forced into retirement. He is definitely not playing games. https://t.co/1kk0JZ2xZd
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Rep. Jasmine Crockett is too dumb to know she wasn't supposed to say this out loud.. https://t.co/6rPnOLKgII
Video Transcript AI Summary
I wanted to share a clip of Jasmine Crockett in an interview. She inadvertently admitted something that Democrats usually keep quiet.
When asked why Democrats lost, Crockett explained that those who get their news from traditional news sources voted for them. However, people getting their news from non-traditional sources favored Donald Trump by 19 points, which is why they lost. She acknowledged they need to engage on other platforms because they can't rely solely on mainstream media to get their message across.
It's funny because she's saying this out loud, as if it's not a secret that the mainstream media are Democrat propagandists. It's like she forgot she was on camera.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jasmine Crockett is one of my favorite members of congress. She's great because she's easily the dumbest person to ever walk through the halls of congress, which is really saying something, but I think it's I don't even mean it as a joke. I I she really is the dumbest. She's extremely, extremely dumb. On that note, here she is in an interview with, I think, NBC saying something that she doesn't realize she isn't supposed to say out loud.
Listen.
Speaker 1: Why do you think Democrats lost, and what do you think needs to happen by the midterms in the next presidential election in in order to find your footing again?
Speaker 2: Well, Kristen, no disrespect to you. I think you do great work. But the reality is that those that tune in to our traditional news sources, they absolutely went for us. And we know that the standards that you have to live by as an actual journalist are completely different from other platforms. And so we know that we were winning for those that were tuning into the traditional news sources.
But when it came down to people getting their news from places that really aren't even news sources, they were going for Donald Trump by 19 points. And that is exactly why we lost. The reality is that we're gonna have to play in spaces that we've never had to play and make sure that we're communicating in all ways. Unfortunately, we can't just rely on the mainstream media to get our message across.
Speaker 0: What makes it funny is that Jasmine is just saying this out loud. I mean, you're you're you're not supposed to admit that the mainstream media are Democrat propagandists. Did you forget you were on camera? Did you think this was some sort of personal Zoom call or something?
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Pam Bondi is pissed. Someone from the FBI leaked information on an immigration raid in Los Angeles. Heads will roll. https://t.co/U6BGAbiHf3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leaking information jeopardizes the lives of law enforcement officers. We will find and prosecute anyone who does so. This will not deter us from our mission to make America safe, as directed by the President.
Our Chicago lawsuit made it clear: violating the law will result in prosecution by the Department of Justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anyone leaks anything, people don't understand. That jeopardizes the lives of our great men and women in law enforcement. And if you leaked it, we will find out who you are, and we will come after you. And it's not gonna stop our mission. It's not gonna stop the president's mission to make America safe again.
We were very clear with the lawsuit that we filed in Chicago that if you don't follow the law, you will be prosecuted by the Department of Justice.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
If anyone get indicted, this guy should be the first. https://t.co/egm9B6hZxu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Justice may indict Donald Trump the day he leaves office. I strongly support indicting a president after they leave office. Threatening political opponents with jail time is unacceptable presidential behavior in a democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the justice department, may indict him. Very strongly in favor of indicting the president when he is out of office. I don't think the incoming president should be threatening his political opponents with jail time. That's not the kind of talk we should hear from the president, in a democracy.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Ilhan Omar is breaking the law. She has no business being in Congress or in this country. https://t.co/jc8dmxMeRO
Video Transcript AI Summary
At a recent seminar, I advised Somalis in the U.S. illegally on their rights regarding deportation. If questioned by ICE, you are not required to answer. Simply state you’ve been advised by a lawyer not to answer. Providing your name, immigration status, or mode of entry isn't mandatory. Learn the laws, prepare yourselves, and avoid disclosing unnecessary information. Know your rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, Ilhan Omar was caught on tape at some sort of seminar recently telling people, giving giving advice to Somalis who are in The United States illegally on their legal rights in helping to avoid deportation. The so so much pro America happening. So much. She's speaking of Somalish. Because I advised the Somalian people that if ICE attempts to question you They're not obligated to answer their questions.
Just state that you are advised by a lawyer not to answer questions. Disclosure of your name, immigration status, mode of entry is not mandatory. Learn the laws and prepare yourself, she says about illegal immigrants. And in art, And refrain from disclosing information you would prefer them not to know. And, information.
Well, maybe she'll be nice and offer these illegal immigrants, a fake marriage so that they too can become citizens of The United States under false pretenses.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
MASSIVE: Trump tells Bongino he's about to blow the lid off Jan 6 cover-ups https://t.co/ao5gWCl5Ez
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need clarity on who Ray Epps and Scaffold Man are, as I believe there's a significant scandal and cover-up involved. Scaffold Man is the individual urging people to enter the building during the incident. We're going to uncover more details about these figures, and I think you'll be pleased with the outcome. I refer to the January 6th detainees as hostages, and they recently created a song that topped the charts, even surpassing Taylor Swift. It’s been quite remarkable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe that is the case. Can we get an answer between you, Pam Bondi, and hopefully, Kash Patel on who this person is and have the FBI open the books? Because I believe this is a huge scandal and a massive cover up.
Speaker 1: I think we will, and I think we're gonna find out about Ray Epps, and I think we're gonna find out out about Scaffold Man. You know who Scaffold Man is. Right? Yeah. The guy who's screaming to everybody, go into the go into the building go into the building.
We're gonna find out who Scaffold Man is, and we're gonna find out some other things. And I think you're gonna be very happy with what I do with respect. I call them the j 6 hostages because I consider them hostages. You know, they did a beautiful song, and they asked what I do the the words the words, not the singing, the words. And I did that song went to number 1 for so long.
It was beating out, Taylor Swift. I'm not a fan of Taylor Swift, but that's okay. And everybody else beating beating them all out for a long time. And, it was pretty amazing.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Santa Ynez reservoir in Pacific Palisades, which holds 117 million gallons, has been dry since 2009. I'm surprised the media hasn't covered this. I explored historical images on Google Earth, and you can see the reservoir has had no water since 2009. I wanted to share the link, but it wouldn't allow me. If you're curious, search for Santa Ynez Reservoir on Google Earth and check the historical images from 2009 and 2011 to see for yourself.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
The 117 million gallon Santa Ynez reservoir in Pacific Palisades, has not had water in it since 2009. How has the media not picked up on this? When on Google Earth you can skip through all of the historical images in the timeline by year. I tried to post the Google Earth link, but it is not allowing me. Search for it on Google Earth under Santa Ynez Reservoir, Pacific Palisades and view by Historical Images. Here are screenshots of 2009 and then 2011, where it has no water...and has not has water since then. Source: tumblr: 1americanconservative
