TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RobotPolisher
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
👽 The *Last* Card 🛸 https://t.co/wo9xG8esvC
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1974, I was introduced to the late Doctor Wernher von Braun in the U.S., the father of rocketry. He would repeat to me over and over, and the last card, the last card, the last card would be the extraterrestrial threat. And they're all lies. There is no threat. It's all based on a lie. Space. There'll be a lot of things happening in space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1974, I was introduced to the late Doctor. Wernher von Braun in The U. S, the father of rocketry. He would repeat to me over and over, and the last card, the last card, the last card would be the extraterrestrial threat. And they're all lies.
There is no threat. It's all based on a lie. Space. There'll be a lot of things happening in space.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
The Lost History Of Flat Earth - Ewaranon 1/2 https://t.co/Elo2rat3si
Video Transcript AI Summary
Once awake, it’s hard to fall back asleep. Realizing the Earth is flat and stationary challenges mainstream narratives shaped by so-called scientific authorities. Historical structures, like the pyramids and ancient canals, raise questions about the capabilities of our ancestors, who supposedly lacked advanced tools. The intricacy of these constructions suggests a lost civilization with advanced technology, possibly harnessing electromagnetic energy through water and sound. The narrative of progress is flawed; many grand structures were inherited, not built by the 19th-century populace. The existence of numerous orphans during this time hints at a societal reset, where children were relocated to repopulate empty cities. Ultimately, the interconnectedness of water, sound, and electromagnetic energy reveals a hidden history of technological sophistication that has been obscured by modern narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once you are awake, it is almost impossible to fall back to sleep again. Once you discover that the earth is not a spinning globe, but a flat and stationary plane with a firmament above it, everything changes. The trusted voices and satanic scientific priests who once shaped our reality and understanding of the world, are no longer reliable. Our firsthand experience of the earth as a stationary realm is at odds with their fabricated narrative of space and spinning planets. The scarring of our land and the barbaric mining of earth's once majestic giant trees, is at odds with the history books and geological narrative.
And the awaker left wondering, what on earth happened. If they've lied about the earth, space, and the destruction of our flat realm, then how can we trust the official mainstream historical narrative. The historical narrative, like the heliocentric model, does not make sense. It doesn't add up, and all it takes is a closer examination, and their lies which have governed our understanding of history and the world since our birth begin to fall apart. Let's stir the mind with a few contemplations.
We are told that the first true power tool was invented in 18/95. When a german company combined an electric motor with a manual drill. The drill weighed 16 and a half pounds and required multiple operators. It wasn't until 1957 that a company called bosch began designing power tools in bulk that were both economical and powerful. So then how did our historical ancestors, a more primitive, underdeveloped people, design and build some of the structures we encounter.
What about all the gigantic monolithic stones we encounter, that have been cut with such precision. Ask yourself. Could you repeat this today with the arsenal of equipment we have at our disposal? And what about the magnificent ancient stepwells of the east? Stepwells we are told, were multi storied wells built by our primitive ancestors, as ways to preserve the water supply during droughts.
But look at the intricacy and complexity of these structures. Look at the glory and the finesse. Look at the geometric precision. All dug out and crafted from using hand tools. Yeah right.
What about the gigantic canal networks we find all over the world. The eerie canal in America was allegedly built between 18/17/18/25. There were no civil engineers in America at this time. The people responsible for planning construction were novices, we are told. The canal is 12 meters wide and 4 meters deep.
The eerie canal spans 363 miles. But this was not just a case of digging each day for the irish immigrants and their oxen companions. They had to fell hundreds of trees as they passed through the virgin forest. They had to build complicated aqueducts and locks, and they had to pass through the Niagara escarpment. An 80 foot high wall of hard limestone.
They had to use black powder to blast through this, we are told, as dynamite had yet to be invented. The canal spans 363 miles and was constructed over an 8 year period. This means that on average, 1 mile was completed every 8 days. What a record. Especially since those responsible were novices, and power tools, and dynamite were yet to be invented.
I can tell you now, the so called early settlers of the Americas did not build these canal systems. And what of the grand and magnificent castles scattered across our realm? Did you know that most were designed and constructed without plumbing systems and methods to heat rooms properly? The royal and the elites of the past were content without having the accessible necessities of survival just as long as they could live within the grand and the glorious. While the peasants in their modest abodes enjoyed warmth throughout the long dark winters.
I don't think so. And of course, there is the impossibility of the great giza pyramid complex. The pyramids, we are told, were constructed somewhere around 2,500 bc. The great pyramid itself consists of 2,300,000 blocks of limestone and granite, and its overall structure weighs 6,000,000 tons. The largest granite stones weigh between 20 80 tons each.
20 tons is 20,000 kilograms. These blocks were carved from quarries with copper chisels and allegedly transported from 800 kilometers away. The so called experts can only theorize that a vast amount of slave labor was required. Being gullible and falling for the official narrative of slave labor is one thing, but can someone please explain how the air shafts of the great pyramid align so neatly with the circumpolar stars. And then there is the curious case of starforce, or what the official liars of the world call bastionthoughts.
Developed in the late 15th early 16th century, these thoughts we are told, were designed during an era of gunpowder and the cannon. The geometric design offered a nation's military protection against blind spots during conflict. Of course they did. We all know that the best protection during war is to design a fort with such precise geometric patterning. Has any real historian ever stopped to think just how perfect the geometry is here?
Our primitive ancestors did not have the technology to view structures from above but they still managed to achieve this. Give me strength. There is no way. We could not produce such perfect geometry on this scale today. We've been fooled once again.
We have been indoctrinated with a false historical narrative and timeline, and like the silly heliocentric model, all it takes is a closer look at this narrative and things soon start to fall apart and the lies become so blatantly evident. Because of their satanic lies, piecing together an accurate, honest, historical timeline, has become an impossible rubik's cube. The official narrative, a pandora's box. Only offering us tiny clues, half truths, and deceptions. The stitch ins of our true historical timeline have been loosened.
The contents are raised and muddled before we were even born into this world, and herein lies the problem. How to know where you are going, if you don't know where you are in the first place. But you see awakening is truly a gift. Once awake we learn that we've always had the answers right in front of us. We've always had more than we know but we had to regain our sight first before things started falling into place, before things started to make a little more sense.
And here we are again viewer, at the precipice of another great journey. What if I told you that before us there existed a civilization that was responsible for the most advanced technology ever developed and that it was their understanding of the workings of our flat realm that was key to their innovation? And what if I told you that it is highly likely that our true history as a people only begun just over 200 years ago. Would you think of me as mad once again? Do I sound as preposterous as when I first told you that the earth is flat?
Perhaps. And that's why I need to show you. What I hope to show you is one of the greatest cover ups of all time. It is on par with the heliocentric lie in its enormity and the impact it has upon humanity, and as I will try to show you, it is inextricable from the true nature of our flat realm earth, and you cannot understand one without understanding the other. We cannot waste time, for we must journey in search of lost time.
At its heart, this is a story about deception. It is also a story of endings and deceptions and falsities underpinning our historical narrative, this story cannot be told in a linear fashion. We need to go back and forth in time to really draw out something that brings us a little closer to the truth. It is also imperative to understand, that like much contemporary science, history as a discipline was corrupted a long time ago. At its most innocent, a lot of established historical narrative is guesswork but at its worst, it is a set of lies agreed upon as a so called Napoleon put it so succinctly.
We are going to be digging in the dark. No historian will be there to help us. We are alone in this journey. Our journey is a hunt for things buried in plain sight. And things may become a little uncomfortable at times but it is necessary.
We have been living a comfortable life for far too long now. Come on, jump in and put your seatbelt on, for to understand our place in the world, we need to do the unthinkable. It's time for us to take a journey back to the future. Our journey begins in the unlikeliest of places, 19th century Saint Petersburg, at the entrance to Saint Isaac's Cathedral, the city cold, the early morning mists dissipating with the approach of the sun, and our boots caked in mud. The year is 18 60, and while Saint Petersburg stands regal and proud, its inhabitants are nowhere to be found.
It is quiet, too quiet. The population of Saint Petersburg in the 18 sixties was, we are told, roughly 500,000 people, and yet there is not a soul in sight. Where is everybody? The long shadow of Alexander Column gives us a clue as to the time of the sun's journey above this region. Long shadows only occur during morning or evening.
It must be morning, but it appears that no one has surfaced yet. If we travel 400 miles across to Moscow, we see the same thing. Empty, quiet streets. In 18/60, Moscow shared a similar population with Saint Petersburg, roughly 500,000 citizens. But again, where is everybody?
What about the rest of the world during this time period? Edinburgh, scotland, 18 forties. Copenhagen, Denmark, 18 forties. Dresden, Germany, 18 sixties. Rio in Brazil, 18 sixties.
Toronto, Canada, 18 sixties. Athens in Greece, 18 sixties. And then London. Finally, people. And what about Paris?
People. Life. The first photograph, we are told, was created in 18/22. The art of photography relies on methods of juxtaposition, of comparison, and contrast to deliver its message and sentiment. In these old photographs, we do not find the same deliberate techniques of juxtaposition that contemporary photographers craft into their art, but rather we find natural contrasts, that are so important and central to navigating through our deceptive history.
Contrast is a phenomenon, natural or artificial, in which meaning is generated and conveyed through the comparison of 2 opposing elements. When looking at 18 sixties Russia, there is an immediate contrast between the lack of population and the sheer size of these cities. Even in the 19th century, both Moscow and Saint Petersburg are enormous. The infrastructure found in the photographs, could hold a population well into the millions. Why are the cities so vast, if the population was only 500,000 in each.
Furthermore, the official narrative gives us a population that increases in a linear fashion from 17/64. Many of the buildings we see here were built years before the photograph was taken. Did the Russians just plan well in advance? But it's when the population is introduced into these photographs that a new contrast emerges that is staggering, that is between the people and the environment itself. It may be the reduced population numbers, or it may be the monochromatic starkness of the black and white images, but they present to us something that we've lived amongst our entire lives and never paid any mind to.
That is the enormity and impossibility of the architecture. As we engage with the industry and acts of tourism, we journey from place to place and observe, taking it all in, learning, hearing, and being told what we are looking at and how it came to be. And standing in front of a structure like the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, we might even exclaim, wow. How did they do this? But the moment, inextricably wrapped up in the busyness of the scene, perhaps prevents us from really asking that question with sincerity.
Standing in front of a structure like the Arc de Triomphe, while the crowd frantically takes pictures on their smartphones, makes it all a reality. And we conclude before being shoved away by new tourists. Well, they had to have done it somehow because I'm here and looking at it. During our indoctrination at school, we are seldom shown old photographs of the grand cities scattered around our flat realm, and perhaps for good reason. Because when we marinate on images like this and are presented with the visual evidence of a very primitive, Victorian people, dotted around like grasshoppers within the shadows of the most magnificent, grandiose, brilliant architecture a human could ever imagine, we begin to have doubts.
Indeed, how did they build this? The Art de Triomphe is made from 36,000 695 cube meters of limestone, and weighs 95,407 tons or just over 95,000,000 kilograms. They tell us it took 12 years to build the giant arch in 2 different periods, between 18 06 to 18 14, and between 18 32 to 18 36. How did they transport this amount of limestone with the same horse and carts that we see in the photographs? Look closer at the 4 sculptures that adorn each of its sides.
Look at the intricacy of the sculptures, and the patterning of the ornamentation that frames the arch. Each section is perfectly repeated without any deviation or inconsistency. The first true power tool was not invented until 60 years after this arch was completed. They tell us this was crafted by hand. Is that even possible?
And then there is the ceiling of the arch, immaculate, 3 d sculpted roses, perfect in their geometric symmetry. The nuance of the detail and finesse of each petal and cross section borders is overwhelming. Look at the rest of Paris during this time. Again, a plethora of unbelievable, gigantic, and magnificent structures. The city's infrastructure, glorious, and the people and their means of transport primitive, unsophisticated, and seeming not at all developed to the point of producing a city like this.
The roads are improperly paved and uneven. They are dirty and muddy. We also see buildings during this period in which the architecture aligns with the inhabitants. Buildings of misshapen proportions, less developed and refined, charming in their own way but coarse in their use of wood and plaster. This is exactly the type of architecture we expect of a generation of horse and cart, a generation ignorant to the discoveries in technology that would follow in the years to come.
Furthermore, at the time of this photograph, the arch is roughly 40 years old since its completion. Yet can you see how worn some of the parts of the structure are? We see weathering on the stone that suggests the arch is much older. As we approach the late 19th century, we see that the people of Mosto have finally decided to leave their homes and venture out into the streets. The infamous Red Square, now bustling with life, Saint Basil's Cathedral and the Spasquaya Tower dominate the frame of the square.
The construction of Saint Basil's Cathedral began in 15/55 and was completed in 15/61, a mere 6 years. It suffered a huge fire in 17/37, and underwent restoration over a 20 year period. But look at it. What a structure. Almost unreal, and like no other.
It is composed of thousands of red bricks and tin sheet metal that has been shaped into the distinctive onion domes we see. Look closer at the intricacy of the domes. How did they bend metal to achieve such precision and perfection in the 18th century? And again, if they had the skills and dedication to build a wonder such as this, then why are the conditions of the road so poor and covered in mud. We see these incredible structures and buildings everywhere in 19th century photography.
We have the wondrous crystal palace of London. A monstrous structure with the greatest area of glass ever seen in a building and all constructed before England had automatic glass manufacturing. We have Westminster Abbey and parliament. We have the old Houston Arch, constructed out of pure sandstone in 18/37. And streets unpaved and full of mud.
Why did these people not prioritize the streets they walked upon? The Frauenkirche, the domed masterpiece of Dresden, Germany. It's intricate and opulent splendor in direct contrast with the beat up wagons and horse pulled carts of the people below. A people dependent on the bare necessities. A people completely dwarfed by its size and majesty.
The library of parliament in Ottawa, 20,000. With a the city's population was under 20,000. Would a grand, glorious library really be a priority for settlers? Why does the building look like it's been cropped out of Europe and pasted into Canada? Even at the turn of the century, 40 years before Bosch economized the power tool, we have the old Penn Station in New York.
Look at the size of this. Completely mind blowing proportions. As we can see here in the photograph, each octagonal sculpted pattern on the arched dome ceiling is larger than 1 individual human. Look at the gigantic columns and detailed asanther sleeves decorating the tops of each pillar. They tell us this station took 6 years to build.
6 whole years. Yeah right. Why are we so gullible. Even without access to modern power tools, principal construction pieces, and crane technology, we could not reproduce this today. And more importantly, we don't reproduce this type of architecture today.
The official liars of our world have an umbrella term for this type of architecture that we see in North America. They call it, historicism. Historicism is a term coined to describe a style of architecture that is revival in nature, or in other words, copies the style of another period in time. The grand arches and buildings with giant columns we see are built in the classical or Greco Roman style, and the cathedrals are built in the Renaissance and Gothic styles of medieval Europe. Components of these particular styles of architecture feature large spires, arched windows, towers, turrets, domes, arcaded arches, sculptures, enormous doors, circular geometric windows, columns, clock faces, and bell towers.
Traces of this impossible architecture are literally found everywhere, in every city and across our world today. Some preserved and maintained, like the Parisian Arc D'Triomphe and Notre Dame, and others lost and long forgotten to time, like the Houston Arch and the Old Penn Station in New York. We as a people travel miles to take our own photographs of these wonders. But the photographers of the 19th century gift us with something. Something they would never have expected to give a future generation.
Perspective. We see a primitive people against a backdrop of clearly advanced architectural infrastructure. The official historians of the world tell us tales of darwinian evolution and progression between time periods. The people that came after were always more advanced in their ways, refining and redefining the methods of the generation that came before. If the height of innovation and industry during the 19th century was still the horse and car as a means of travel, then, as these photographs tell us, this style of architecture was just as impossible for those living in the centuries before it.
Anyone with a predisposition for thinking and questioning can immediately sense when looking at these photographs that something is rotten in Denmark, that something is off with the mainstream historical narrative, that something is not adding up. In a panoramic image of San Francisco in 18/77, we see a collage of historicist architecture. We see columns adorning the entrances to very regal buildings that stand out like sore thumbs from some of the timber shacks surrounding it. We see gothic spires and towers in the distance. We see domed cathedrals and buildings.
We also see just how sprawling and huge the city has become. In 1846, there were under 500 Mormon settlers living on the area of land in which we now call San Francisco. It was frontier land and ready for the taking. Between 18481849, with the start of the California gold rush, the population increased from 1,000 people to 25,000 people. 28 years later, this panorama was taken.
The population at this time, we are told, was getting close to 200,000. Who in their right mind would believe this story? Does this look like a city of 200,000 people without any modern technology, power tools, automatic manufacturing, electric motors. A people in a strange unfounded land just making their mark. Do we really believe that a burgeoning people built this entire city in just 30 years?
And again, such quietness, such stillness. This is a photograph of an empty city. Where are all the people? The shadow of the post here tells us that it is not the early hours of the morning. Short shadows only appear toward midday.
A city of this scale at noon should be bustling with life. But there is not a single person in the shot of this panorama. The only life we see is that of a horse without any master in sight. It seems highly unlikely that all the people were told to stay indoors because a cityscape photo shoot was taking place. And this silent scene becomes all the more eerie when we consider that there is intention behind the lens.
Someone was there, standing at a vantage point and taking this photograph. But who and for what? And what are the chances that in the 19th century, during similar decades, we see deserted Russian, European and North American cities photographed like this. People a people clearly incapable of building the architecture found in these cities. And what to do with these photographs?
If we accept the narrative and these strange anomalies, then we stop here and get back to our busy lives. But the narrative we've received is not the truth, and we shouldn't accept any narrative, no matter how official and certified it is, unless it makes sense. The people we see in these photographs and their early ancestors could not have built the magnificent architecture we see. It is an impossibility. Come on.
Jump in. We must venture further into these cities and look a little closer. There must be some clues waiting to be uncovered that helps us understand why these cities are empty. Wait, what's that you say? You want to wipe the mud from your boots first?
Do not bother, it's a waste of time. Come on, jump in and let's go, for it is the mud that offers us some small clues as to what could have occurred during this time period. In June 2011, Christchurch, New Zealand suffered an earthquake that left a lot of the city in chaos, destroying buildings and infrastructure, and leaving over 50,000 homes without power. As a result, there were collapsed houses, ruptured water mains, flooding, and fires due to disrupted electrical lines. Due to the strong ground motions and intense shaking, part of the city experienced a strange phenomenon known as soil liquefaction.
Sand boils emerge from asphalt roads, toppling and sinking cars and causing boulders to fall from hills resulting in more home damage. Soil liquefaction occurs when saturated soil loses its strength and stiffness in response to an applied stress such as shaking or other sudden changes such as a strong explosion. Loose saturated soil or sand has a tendency to compress when a load is applied. But in the event of a stress such as shaking or an explosion, we see the opposite. The soil tends to dilute and the result is treacherous quicksand or quick clay.
The land turns to liquid causing structures of heavy mass such as buildings, infrastructure, and cars to start sinking, topple over, or collapse. It can also affect dams and bridges. Turbidity currents can also form huge landslides that are impossible to stop. In the worst case scenario, entire cities may be destroyed. As you can see, liquefaction can move entire areas of land.
The mud can rise dramatically and rapidly, and its destructive force is unstoppable. It is a well documented phenomenon. The 1964 earthquake in Nagata, Japan calls liquefaction, and we can see the effects very clearly in these photos. The same here with the 1964 Alaska earthquake. Buildings toppling.
Cars sinking. Infrastructure collapsing. Once the stress has subsided, the soil begins to solidify once again and we can see the aftermath. Uneven muddy streets remain where there was once road paving. Returning to photographs of 19th century cities, we see a similar situation here.
The roads are unrefined and full of mud. We see unsophisticated, uneven, coarse, and muddy roads everywhere against the backdrop of refined, sophisticated, and magnificent architecture. Could these cities have suffered the similar fate of soil liquefaction that we see in more recent times? Perhaps. But, unfortunately, muddy roads is not enough evidence to base any conclusions on, is it?
Children are some most vital of questions, and adults, in their foggy stupor, usually provide the most unsatisfactory answers. Often regurgitating learned nonsensical information that leave the child's imagination unfulfilled. Squelching along these muddy 19th century roads, observing their surroundings, a child may ask, why did they build the window so low to the ground? And what an excellent question. Yes.
Why indeed did they build windows on ground level? For you see, the people we see in these photographs sadly, did not build this architecture. And maybe some of them, at some point in their busy day to day life, ask the exact same question. We see it everywhere. Windows at ground level.
Windows partially below ground level. 1st floor entrances raised from the ground level. Steps leading down to entrances below ground level. We can find this in almost every major city across our realm. In both old photographs and when we walk in the streets today.
And what does it tell us? That a society with access to modest construction tools, and horse and car, constructed their infrastructure by first spending countless amounts of hours and energy clearing land with a depth of over 3 meters to begin their construction? Building basement floors is incredibly hard work. Since the 20th century, large powered excavation machines, such as backhoes and front end loaders, have reduced the time and manpower needed to dig a basement dramatically as compared to digging by hand with a spade. Perhaps you could say that our historical ancestors were just that dedicated to the architecture they built.
And you could say that many of the sunken buildings we see are actually due to elevations and depressions in the natural landscape. The official narrative which is always full of inconsistencies, perhaps would suffice if it was not for contemporary excavation. When we look at photographs such as this, it immediately dawns upon us that what we are seeing are windows and doors 2 to 3 meters below the ground surface. Why are there windows and doors underground? What is this that we see in our cities?
Natural soil accumulation over time? Geologists have never been able to ascribe a consistent value to worldwide natural topsoil accumulation because it is impossible. Some regions of our realm experience consistent topsoil accumulation whereas other regions actually experience consistent erosion. Many historians and archaeologists have noted that many cities over the centuries have been destroyed through war and natural phenomenon such as earthquakes, volcanic ash, and flooding. Aren't these just the layers of previous civilizations?
No. They are not. We see over and over again whole floors of buildings consistent with the architecture existing above the layer of You see, what lies beneath is not the unfamiliar traces of previous generations, but of the same generation that built these structures. And once you really see this kind of sunken buried infrastructure that exists in such prevalence across our world, you can never unsee it. We see that the foundations of old churches are actually the original first floors with consistent entrances and windows.
We see mosaics unearthed. We see pillars, columns, and arches that were originally much larger, and it was the layer of soil that reduced their size, as if they weren't big enough to begin with. And like with the 1964 in the Garter, Japan, we also find many so called ancient structures that are leaning. As if at some point, the soil beneath these structures loosened and liquefied. We have the Saracens Church Tower and our dear lady at the mountain church tower in Germany, the Tiger Hill Pagoda in China, the Leaning Tower of Nevoyansk in Russia, the Leaning Temple of Huma in India, Utkirk in the Netherlands, the tower of Zaragoza in Spain and, of course, the tower of Pisa.
The official liars of the world try to justify the buried and tilting structures we see, filling our heads with stories of antiquity and ever changing geology. But it becomes trickier for them when we turn our attention to America. If we are to believe their narrative, then all of the buildings we see in 19th century photographs of the burgeoning American cities are newly constructed. Why do we see famous structures such as the Washington capitol building with consistent infrastructure that buries very deep into the ground? And again, the inconsistencies do not add up.
Why would an underdeveloped people waste resources, energy, and time constructing the foundations of the capitol building to be consistent with the column style we find above the surface. The foundations did not have to feature columns. Columns, we are told, are a stylistic choice, not a functional one. So why would they do this? In a nutshell, they wouldn't.
We see images that suggest that the people of the 19th century were actually concerned with moving a lot of the vast amount of mud we see, leveling the ground, and excavating existing structures. The consistency and prevalence of buried architecture across our realm indicate that whatever happened was a worldwide event despite regional differences in natural topsoil accumulation and erosion. And there is no official narrative explanation that justifies the buried architecture we see. No explanation provided to justify the amount of mud we see in 19th century photographs of our cities. On the roads, mud piles from clearing, the roads uneven, the land ravaged, but the architecture grand, perfect, and intact.
Applauded by literary scholars for his use of fog as an opening simile and metaphor to paint a portrait of london as a corrupted hub amidst burgeoning industrialization. Many often overlook that Charles Dickens' 1852 novel Bleak House actually opens with a different image. London. Michaelmas' term lately over and the lord chancellor sitting in Lincoln's inn hall. Implacable November weather, as much mud in the streets as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth.
Liquefaction caused havoc across christchurch in the garter, but these were isolated earthquake events, and only portions of each city were affected. It is not possible for there to have been huge simultaneous earthquakes around the world during a similar period, or is it? Even wikipedia tells us that liquefaction can occur naturally or artificially from an earthquake or other sudden change in stress condition. Even if this was the case, we do not see the same structural damage to the buildings in the 19th century like we do in cases such as christchurch and negarta. Most of the buried architecture we see is intact.
It is either sunken or the ground level has been raised at least 3 meters. Sometimes in a uniform manner, and other times partially buried in rolling mud hills as if there were huge landslides. The strange case of the buried architecture provides the following conclusions. That what lies beneath are not the remains of previous civilizations. More often than not, the buried structures are consistent with the architecture we see above ground.
That the structures are much larger than originally suspected, and therefore they are even more of a construction possibility for a Victorian generation of horse and car and those existing before them. That natural topsoil accumulation and soil liquefaction are not satisfactory explanations for what we see here. Whatever took place had to be something much larger and widespread such as a natural or artificial earthly cataclysm of sorts. As many of the photographs show, many citizens of the 1800 were responsible for moving much of the mud, leveling the ground, and excavating buildings, which suggests that whatever happened had happened very recently in their past. The complete absence of a reasonable mainstream justification for the buried architecture we see, suggests that the controllers of our realm are deliberately trying to hide whatever happened.
And what are the deserted cities we see in the earlier photographs? If these cities were truly empty, then we must ask why. We must also ask how all the people got there in the end. In the space of 30 or so years, we see a city go from barren to bustling. Interestingly, it is Charles Dickens, a 19th century literature more generally, that offers some clues.
2 central themes run throughout 19th century victorian literature. That of marriage and female chastity, and that of orphans and adoption. Many of the fictional characters we've come to love over the years are orphans. We have Oliver Twist and Pip from great expectations. We have little orphan Jane Eyre, and Heathcliff from wuthering heights.
We have Mowgli from the jungle book. Gazette from les miserables. We have heidi, rapunzel, peter pan, snow white. We have tom sawyer, and huckleberry finn, and anne of green gables. And these books were of their time as far as orphan prevalence goes.
The only issue is that these novels romanticize the orphan as a figure, dislocated from society by default, and therefore pave their life's path as one of unforeseen opportunity. This was not reality. The theme of marriage and chastity that we find in so many 19th century literary works, such as those by Jane Austen, the brontees, George Eliot, Dickens, Thomas Hardy, Leo Tolstoy, Victor Hugo, and more was nothing more than carefully disguised well written propaganda with their sole purpose to solidify and justify a social value framework that would separate children from their mothers. Children born outside of marriage or wedlock were regarded as illegitimate, meaning they did not have a legal status. Illegitimate children was a serious stigma throughout the 19th century.
The majority of employers would not hire women with an illegitimate child. Many unwed mothers with illegitimate children ended up without a home, in poor health, starving, exhausted. Their only place of refuge would be the workhouse where they would carry out the most unpleasant duties. In some places, women with illegitimate children were singled out and had to wear a special uniform which alerted everyone to their status as an unmarried mother or fallen woman. As a result, a vast amount of orphanages and foundling institutions were established.
This is the London foundling hospital that was very active in the 19th century. Look at the size of it. Charles Dickens was obsessed with this place. Inspiration, they say. The official narrative tells us that an estimated 4,500 women handed over their children to this huge building.
But this was just one institution. Wikipedia gives us a partial list of over 64 orphanages that were founded in the UK during 19th century. The list is only partial. The peculiar case of the vast amount of parentless children in the 19th century is well documented by many researchers. And most of them agree it is almost impossible to establish figures that really do justice to just how many orphans there were during this period.
Their footprint did not enter the record books. It formed in the mud and was then washed away. It wasn't just the UK. This was a worldwide phenomenon. New York City had 4 foundling asylums alone that process thousands of children annually.
By the beginning of 20th century, Italy was reporting 32,000 children per year. Spain and Portugal were reporting 15,000 annual foundlings. Before 18/60, 374,000 recorded infants were processed by the asylums in Milan, Naples, and Florence alone. Historian david l ransall states that moscow was receiving between 16,018,000 infants annually by the 18 eighties, and sending over 10,000 of these each year to outlying villages for care. In 1882, there were all told 41,720 foundlings from the moscow home living with 32,000 foster families scattered throughout 4,418 villages.
A dozen villages had over 90 fosterings each. One thing that is often overlooked is that there were a series of laws passed in the 1800s, making it almost impossible for unwed mothers to keep their babies. The 1833 poor law reformation introduced bastardy clauses that shifted the entire responsibility for the illegitimate child onto the mother. Social stigma meant that she would not be able to provide care for her child and would be forced to hand them over to the authorities or worse. Advertisements for adoption or nurse care became popular in newspapers.
And as many scholars have pointed out, these were a front for what was termed baby farmers or paid murder. As dorothy l halla states, the adverts may have been misleading to the general public but read like a coded message to unwed mothers. No references are asked for and none are offered. The sum of 15 shillings a week to keep an infant or a sickly child was inadequate, and a sickly child and an infant under 2 months were the least likely to survive and the cheapest to bury. Infants were taken, no questions asked, and it was understood that for £12 no questions were expected to be asked.
The transaction between the mother and the baby farmer usually took place in a public place, on public transportation, or through a second party. No personal information was exchanged. The money was paid, and the transaction was complete. The mother knew she would never see her infant alive again. Most children, however, were not murdered but were dropped off at the doorsteps of orphanages or the workhouse.
All children taken into these institutions were given entirely new identities. They were provided for with shelter, food, and clothing temporarily, and then sent off to workhouses or another location. Photographs in the 19th century were scarce but towards the end of the century, we see more photographs and the last continent to experience such mass exodus of orphans was the United States. And it is here that we see evidence of the orphan trains. The first group of these orphans arrived in Michigan in 1854.
And from that moment on, the movement shipped hundreds of thousands of children across the states until it ended in 1929. Officially, there were over 97 institutions involved in orphans and orphan trains in the 19th century. And again, this was not just the United States. Annie McPherson will go down in history as a woman who scammed more than a 100000 foundlings and shipped them from the United Kingdom to Canada, new Zealand, and South Africa, and even to the outer edges of the earth in Australia so that they could be sold into child labor. Why do we see so many photographs of orphans in workhouses?
Why are they working with machinery created for adult use? Were there not enough adults during this time to carry out this work? And then there is the strange case of the burgeoning American amusement parks at the turn of the 20th century. In addition to rides and exhibits, many of these parks featured an unusual attraction, inventoryums. Visitors of these parks could stroll around with ice cream and swing by these stations.
A visit equivalent to that of a fully functional neonatal intensive care unit, complete with incubators german mind behind the incubators. His first encounter with premature babies, we are told, was at the 18 96 world's fair. He knew immediately that the exhibition would save babies' lives. The technology to keep premature babies alive was expensive and he knew the public would pay to see the babies in incubators. He would charge an entrance fee at the amusement parks to generate funds to help these babies live.
Nurses tended to the babies as an enraptured public looked on. Like any other amusement, the premature baby exhibits included carnival barkers who tried to lure the public to come and see the babies. I don't know about you but I find something very off about these incubators. Advertisers featuring living babies. A lot of the fairs where cooney showed his babies also featured eugenics exhibitions.
Eugenics is a field of corrupted pseudoscience that endorses selective breeding to improve the genetic quality of the human population. Eugenics was inspired by Darwinism and was a driving ideology that fueled the nazis. Why are people paying to see living babies as if they had never seen a living infant before? Did people of the time not have their own babies? And where are these infants' parents?
How did they have the technology in the 19th century to keep premature babies alive in such a way? Or is something off once again with the official narrative? There were 80,000 premature babies who were treated in these amusement park incubators. 80,000. The 100 of 1,000 of orphans in the 19th century are just barely believable.
Were women really that carefree? Did America even have the population numbers to justify 80,000 premature babies. We are not talking orphans here but infants born prematurely. The narrative is not convincing or realistically fathomable. Where did these babies come from?
More troubling is cooney's background. As many historians have pointed out, he had no medical degree or training. His story is a very similar one of unconvincing philanthropy that we find surrounding some of our contemporary figures today, that also do not have medical degrees. And then there is Marie dressler, a Canadian silent film and depression era movie star. She adopted one of these incubator babies.
Ah, celebrities and adoption. The official narrative conveniently leaves this out of her story and tells us that she may have had a daughter who died as a small child. But the photographs suggest otherwise. Did she adopt her incubator baby at one of these fairs? Were the fairs a front for illicit adoption of premature babies?
Even if they were premature, did that mean they had no parents? Who owned and was responsible for these parks? And what happened to the babies once they grew and left the incubators? If something feels eerily wrong about the entire narrative surrounding these parks and orphans, it's because we are not being told the truth. Why were there 100 of thousands of parentless children in the 19th century?
Where did they come from? They were relocated all over the world. Europe, America, Russia, Australia, Canada. Why? Especially when most still had a living parent.
If pregnancy out of wedlock was such a social stigma that resulted in such trauma, why would so many people put themselves in that position in the first place? Did the government really care about social morality enough to pass laws? And all the effort to build and maintain orphanages and orphan relocation networks. Would this not burden governmental finances and administration systems? It certainly would have.
But you see, there was a greater purpose behind the government's worldwide agenda. Repopulation. The social narrative of chastity was nothing more than propaganda and justification for stealing children. The reason we see empty cities in the early 19th century is because they were in fact empty, void of population. And the reason they are bustling 30 years later is because orphans were shipped into these cities to repopulate them.
You see, in the early 19th century, there was a worldwide reset of sorts through depopulation and then repopulation. The people we see in these photographs did not build this architecture. They inherited it along with a lot of mud. Not only did they inherit it without a clue as to what it actually was and who it belonged to, but they were unknowingly complicit in repurposing pretty much all of these structures. I know.
None of this is making much sense at the minute. You are probably wondering why on earth these cities were empty and full of mud. What happened that meant governments needed to repopulate the earth? And I know what you're thinking. This is all very intriguing, but what does this have to do with flat earth?
You want to know more about the firmament, the sun and moon, and our stationary plane. Do not worry. Everything will become clearer as we continue our journey. The prevalent evidence of buried infrastructure coupled with deserted cities and a burgeoning industry of orphans is just the start. These are all necessary clues, hinting at some kind of cataclysm, but the real story hasn't truly begun yet.
The stage had to be set first, and now it is ready. And even if you cannot see it yet, I know you feel it viewer. The deserted cities, the buried architecture, and orphans all signal a looming darkness. There is a great black cloud in front of us, and I won't lie. We are heading right into the heart of it.
And like I said before, we do not have much time. Come on. It's time for me to honor my promise and take you back to the future. Water, an inorganic, transparent, and odorless chemical substance that covers 70% of the known earth's surface. It is the driving life force behind the carbon based organisms that flourish on our earth.
It borders and separates our lands and collects and solidifies at the inner and outer regions of our flat stationary realm. God should have sent a message to the inhabitants of earth and been precise and told them to watch the water, to meditate on its function and natural laws because in their time a great deception would be cast over them like a cold shadow of an unknown nefarious king. And maybe god did send this message in the form of a flood but its truth was mythologized and buried and the lie propagated in spite of it. Rest in water does not curve and convex. The natural laws of a resting body of water insist that it takes the exact shape of the container it fills and always finds and maintains a flat level.
Rest in water always rests flat and watching the water when we sit at vantage points, when journeying above in planes, and before we take a sip from our drink, we must remember to never forget this law. Most of us instinctively understand the laws of water and yet many continue their day to day willfully participating in the nonsensical heliocentric hoax. But for us that know that our earth is not a spinning planet in an infinite vacuum of space, The ones that have studied the sun diligently and realized that it is the sun that is moving and not the earth. The ones that have plotted the illogical roots of flight paths on a globe model and concluded that the model is incorrect. The ones that know that the laws of density govern the rise and fall of objects and have studied vanishing points.
The ones that have forsaken conventional telescopic lenses, pondered rainbows, sun dogs, and the stars above us know that we reside within a dome firmament, and there exists water above us. And the ones that understand that our entire enclosed earth system is governed by electromagnetism, frequency, and vibration that emanates from a central magnetic north pole. We are the ones that scratch our heads and wonder how on earth we got in this heliocentric mess in the first place. And if meditating on the stars in the water beyond our firmament long enough, and on the electromagnetism, frequencies, and vibrations that make them twinkle through so many shades of vibrant colors, and geometric patterns, one might perhaps, just perhaps, ask is there something more to electromagnetism? Something that has been missed, or overlooked, something untold or hidden.
Electromagnetism is a fundamental force of earth. The electromagnetic field takes the form of a torus in which all electromagnetism, frequency, and vibration flows. A toroid is a revolving surface that takes the shape of a doughnut. Toroidal inductors and transformers are central to generating electric energy. There are many ways in which electromagnetism can be produced.
We've looked at some before. We know that a magnetic field can produce electricity, and that electricity can produce a magnetic field. It works both ways. Magnetism and electricity are inextricable. It is a dance of polarity.
Electric charges either repel or attract each other. Magnetic poles attract or repel one another. For every north pole, there is a corresponding south pole. An electric current passing inside a wire creates a corresponding magnetic field outside of the wire, and an electric current is created in a loop of wire when it is moved toward or away from a magnetic field. Horseshoe magnets are powerful permanent magnets.
Due to their shape, in which both magnetic poles are close together, a powerful strong magnetic field is produced. The horseshoe magnet can also function as an electromagnet. The first ever electromagnet was invented in 18/24, we are told, and was in the form of a horseshoe magnet. Its power was evident from the beginning. It weighed only 200 grams but could lift 4 kilograms of iron.
The key to the horseshoe magnet's power is the placement of its poles. You can see the magnetic field here represented by the vector lines. If you look closely, you can see the concentration of the magnetic field is greater near the poles of the magnet. Since as far back as we can remember, we have been presented with and entertained ideas of the future. Not necessarily our future as individuals but the future of humanity, technology, and society at large.
Whether it is in the form of hollywood movies, you know the ones. The action films, the science fiction sagas, and the animated kind, or literature, music, and art exhibitions. In these we see our technology taken to its limits. Crafts fly. Computers live.
Robots help out. Holographic screens decorate every room. Cities continue to grow upward into dominating skylines. Some can teleport and space travel is now possible and the accepted norm. Outside of fiction, we also have sobering documentaries telling us where we are heading, Usually featuring narration by an old man.
Lamenting the unstoppable path we are on. It's all very serious. We are destroying our planet. The only one we have. And we have political parties, nongovernmental organizations, and the trusted voices, and scientific award winning geniuses sharing similar messages.
And really, when you look closer at both the fiction and the alleged facts, they all share the same underlying premise and principles. We are becoming so technologically advanced that the planet we reside on is no longer enough, or can no longer sustain our activity. The advanced artificial intelligence systems, the flying crafts, the breakthroughs in cloning, and medical beds mean that the natural world has suffered as a consequence. And depending on the type of genre you are entertaining, the solution is either, 1, for humanity to perish as a result, Perhaps destroyed by the very artificial intelligence systems it created in the first place, or perhaps by a natural lung choking virus that has mutated and is sweeping the earth to restore natural balance. Or 2, for humans to say goodbye to their lonely little blue ball and head off into space in search of a new home.
But you see, there is no globular planet and there is no space, and therefore all visions of the future are purely fictional and not particularly innocent. What we don't see emphasized in these visions of the future, however, is the potential of electromagnetism to transform all human life, technology, and society, which is strange when you consider that all life and the earth itself is impossible without electromagnetism. Why wouldn't visionaries want to explore this in more detail? Could it be that they are not allowed to? Could it be that they are afraid of something?
Afraid of us connecting one too many dots perhaps? And again, horseshoe magnets can act as powerful electromagnets. If a civilization was to advance technologically through the use of electromagnetism, then the horseshoe magnet would certainly have a tremendous role to play in that development. Yes, it certainly would, and it certainly did. The horseshoe magnet, the art de triomphe.
Yes. One of the most powerful electromagnets ever constructed. Welcome to the future. Except it's the past. The future came and went and we missed it.
The magnificent architecture we see throughout our realm, in which the official liars and controllers of our world have termed historicist, neoclassical, renaissance, gothic, and so on, all belong to 1 whole unified civilization. A civilization so developed, they had harnessed the power of electromagnetism to such a high degree, that they not only built these huge structures but also crafted them with utter finesse and beauty. A celebration of their own technological advancement. The structures were designed with the sole intention of harvesting, free, clean, and powerful electromagnetic energy. The energy was harnessed and collected from the ionosphere above our heads through the use of antennas, spires, domes, and towers.
All the impossible structures we see today have been repurposed and rebranded by our controllers and the citizens of the 19th century. This is not a church. This is not a mosque. This is not a castle and this is not a government building. These are generators, powerful and gargantuous.
They would collect and generate the electromagnetic energy, which was then stored in huge power stations, and distributed and redirected by sophisticated advanced structures. One of which is a huge electromagnet or what we've come to know as triumphal arches. The energy was stored in batteries and capacitors such as towers and obelisks. All cities were constructed across our realm in the form of 1 big interconnected power grid, much like a huge computer motherboard. I already know what you're thinking.
What? He's finally lost it. He had us with flat earth but this is just too much. I know. I know.
I know. The backup programming is kicking in but before you turn away to leave and cast aside your muddy boots, let me show you how it worked. As you know, we live on a flat stationary plane. At the center is a source of magnetism at the north pole, and directly above this is Polaris. Fixed at the central and highest point of a wondrous crystalline dome firmament.
Beneath the firmament, different layers of atmosphere exist at different heights. The ionosphere starts at about 30 miles above earth. It includes a thermosphere and the mesosphere. The ionosphere is an electrical atmosphere that is ionized by the sun's electromagnetism. It also forms the inner edge of the magnetosphere.
I know a lot of big words and abstract concepts but you are familiar with this process and have been witness to it every day for the entirety of your lives. As you can see, the vials here contain molecular gases that are present in the atmosphere above us. When an electromagnetic source such as a tesla coil is applied within close proximity of these gases, the coil's magnetic field ionizes or charges these gases and the result is phosphorescent plasma. The gases become colorized. This is why our sky is primarily blue because the sun's electromagnetic presence ionizes the atmosphere and the result is colored plasma.
When the sun is entering or exiting our region or what the liars of the world call sunrise and sunset, we see a variety of color gradients due to its distance from the ionosphere above us. When the sun is no longer journeying above our region, the sky loses its color and we can see the stars in the firmament beyond. Although the official scientists designate the ionosphere as an atmospheric layer, It is actually an ethereal layer. Ether is the fabric or element that carries electromagnetism. It connects everything in our realm.
It is the fabric that makes the sun and moon and their concentric journey above our disk possible in the first place. Ether is the mysterious 5th element. It connects everything electromagnetically through vibrational energy. It is the glue, the web, the driving force behind absolutely everything. The 4 other elements, air, fire, water, and earth, only exist because of the ether.
They are expressions of ether's vibrations. Cymatics is a good example of ether's presence. The frequencies fed through the caladny plate make the sand or salt form precise and complex geometric shapes. The higher the frequency, the more complex the geometric pattern. But what is the conduit that takes the frequencies vibrations and allows the sound to take such shape?
That is the ether at work. That's why we see fruits and vegetables that closely resemble cymatic patterns. It is the ether at work. All matter is ethereal and the shape and form of that matter are different expressions of the ether, determined by frequency and vibration. Ether is the bridge between electromagnetic frequency and vibrational energy, and the form of matter itself.
You could call it the holy spirit of God. The historical and scientific discourse of ether is a deliberately manipulated one. The enemy introduced the truth only to discredit and subsequently bury it. Some of the alleged figures of the past have written on ether. The so called Aristotle call it the 5th element.
James Clerk Maxwell, the so called father of electromagnetism, spoke of the ether stating, in several parts of this treatise, an attempt has been made to explain electromagnetic phenomena by means of mechanical action transmitted from one body to another by means of a medium occupying the space between them. The underlatory theory of light also assumes the existence of a medium. We have now to show that the properties of the electromagnetic medium are identical with those of the luminiferous medium. The medium he refers to here is the aether. Albert einstein and others successfully solidified the heliocentric model through fraudulent schools of scientific thought, But even einstein could not deny the presence of ether.
According to the general theory of relativity, space is endowed with physical qualities. In this sense, therefore, there exist an ether. According to the general theory of relativity, space without ether is unthinkable. For in such space, there would not only be no propagation of light but also no possibility of existence for the standards of space and time. Measuring rods and clocks, nor therefore any space time intervals in the physical sense.
Even contemporary scientists under the spell of heliocentrism admit it is nonsensical to deny ether's existence. Today, the vacuum is recognized as a rich physical medium. A general theory of the vacuum is thus a theory of everything. A universal theory. It would be appropriate to call the vacuum ether once again.
Returning to the ethereal ionosphere. As I said, this layer of ether above our heads is a constant sea of electromagnetism and is responsible for the color plasma above that we call the sky. The source of its electromagnetism is the sun. It is because of this ionized layer that we get ionospheric lightning in the form of sprites which in turn influence the thunderstorms below. An ion is a particle, atom or molecule with a net electrical charge.
Electricity is a continuous flow of ions. The electrolytes in our body are ionized. Everything is connected by electromagnetism and the ether. Our highly developed and sophisticated historical ancestors not only understood the workings of the ionosphere and the ether but they had developed methods to masterfully harvest it as a fuel to power the entire earth. And while the exact process by which they were able to extract the ether is deliberately hidden from us and remains unknown, the structural remains that humanity has since repurposed and reused as architecture offer us many clues as to how it all worked.
The evidence is everywhere for those with eyes to see, and once you see it, it becomes so glaringly obvious that you'll kick yourself for never noticing in the first place. The matter is very complex and it will take time to really flesh out. So for now, let's have a closer look at some of these structures, and I will introduce some basic concepts. As we continue our journey, we will explore everything in more detail. We see them everywhere.
On top of all these magnificent structures, towers, spires, and pinnacles that rise into piercing antennas. It was through these complex antennas that the ether was harvested. You see, after the great reset of the 1800, the enemy fractured the old world's unified understanding of god and created multiple religions to try and hide god and justify the existence of such grand and beautiful technological structures. And I know this may trigger some people but stay with me. I will not let you down.
But for now, it is critical to understand that a lot of the religious icons that adorn and make up these antennas were never indicators of different religions in the old world nor were they intended to be. They signaled something else entirely. They are usually made from copper and gold. Both are excellent conductors of electricity. In many of the structures we call cathedrals, the symmetrical spikes on the pinnacles worked in a similar fashion, extracting ether from the ionosphere.
Once harvested, the energy would inevitably have been drawn down into the top larger portion of these domed structures. When examining many of the interiors of these domes, we come to realize that they rely heavily on symmetrical ornamentation. This is achieved by indentation or cavities in the masonry. In the world of electromagnetism, a cavity resonator works through symmetry to produce oscillation or vibration of energetic particles. Symmetrical shapes force energetic particles or irons to vibrate in a constant manner.
Is this why we see perfect symmetrical ornamentation within the ceiling of many domed structures? It no doubt sounds absurd but the majority of these structures also feature a smaller type of cavity resonator, or magnetic resonance. Vacuum tube that generates microwaves using the interaction of a stream of ions with a magnetic field while in the cavity resonator. A magnetron operates through a hollowed symmetrical vacuum. It emits powerful microwaves that can act as a source of free energy.
If you break the symmetry or close the vacuum, it no longer functions. But can you see the resemblance? These structures were never intended to hold glass within them. The controllers added the stained glass to the rose windows to shut off the magnetron's function. They closed out instruments of free energy and they are everywhere in these structures.
Interestingly, if you look at the geometry of entire sections of the structures themselves, then it becomes very evident that they function in their entirety like a cavity magnetron to generate energy. All cavity magnetrons consist of a central heated circular metal chamber in which the current leaves, and it's called a cathode. Look at that word. Cathode. Does it remind you of another word?
Cathedral, cathode. Like with everything else, they corrupt the truth and hide things in plain sight. The controllers removed most of the cathodes integral to these cavity magnetrons but there are some structures today in which you can see traces of the old cathodes still present. The heavy reliance on symmetry and cavities within these structures is not coincidental. The symmetrical ornamentation would have worked in a similar manner, causing the energetic particles to vibrate in a constant manner.
The flowers within the squares can be understood as similar to acoustic resonators, working to vibrate the ions. It is here that the energy would have been continually manipulated into vibrational and electromagnetic energy of specific frequencies. Really look at these magnificent acoustic resonators. Could you craft one of these by hand today and at such height? Why would an underdeveloped people spend so much of their time crafting such perfect symmetrical ornamentation, especially if it had no function and was purely aesthetic?
They wouldn't. The cavity resonators and magnetrons would have had to have worked in partnership with a central engine or reactor contained within all these structures. Both resonator and reactor are interesting words. Just like the words conductor, generator, creator, and the name maketa, they all contain the word tor within their linguistic structure. They hold a linguistic memory and pay homage to the torus or toroidal field.
The torus is the flow of electromagnetism. Without this flow of energy, there would be no life on earth. No one can really know for sure but some have suggested that the engine was probably similar to a fusion reactor. The traces of these engines can be found within all of the larger generators. The empty shell of where the engine used to reside is usually but not always octagonal.
It's been right in front of our faces the whole time. The controllers remove the engines. Sometimes repurposing the space as baptisteries and bandstands. Sometimes just leaving the base either barren or attempting to cover them up. We see these octagonal structures in cathedrals, government buildings, mosques, and attached bandstands.
And unless they have been repurposed, these structures seem to hold no overall function. They do not contribute to the overall structure. They appear superfluous and unnecessary. Theories have surfaced that the engines or central technological mechanism was similar to a tokamak. And while I do not subscribe to this idea which will become evident as to why later in the subscribe to this idea which will become evident as to why, later in our journey, for now we will use it for illustrative purposes.
A tokamak is a powerful device that uses a magnetic field to produce plasma in the form of a torus. The contemporary tokamaks we see are used in thermonuclear fusion power. The tokamaks toroidal field, in conjunction with the vibrating ions from the ether, would have produced a highly conductive electromagnetic field of gases called plasma, just like our sun and ionosphere. If those of the old world used anything closely resembling a tokamak's capability, then the result would have been an abundance of free, powerful, clean electromagnetic energy that could fuel entire cities and the entire earth. These were never churches, cathedrals, castles, and parliament buildings.
They were all huge engine generators. The controllers invented labels and terms such as renaissance, greco roman, and so on, to describe the style of these structures. But as you can see, all these magnificent impossible structures, all share the same fundamental structural principles and design despite location, time period, and cultures. And this is because they were created with the sole purpose of generating energy. And just because these structures were never used for prayer and worship does not mean they were not holy sites.
The civilizations of the past had a relationship with the source and the holy spirit or the ether like no other. And they paid homage, reverence, and thanks to it by constructing their generators with such splendor and beauty. And not only that but they constructed the entirety of their structures, statues, and ornamentation in reverence of this gift, in reverence of the energy production that made their way of life possible in the first place. The laurel reef which the satanic controllers have corrupted in their appropriation of the symbol and redesignation of it to represent apollo and lucifer is in fact a toroidal coil. And we see the toroidal coil throughout the old world's infrastructure, as simultaneously having both a function and a celebration of this function.
Electromagnetic coils are electrical conductors. They are used in applications where electric current interacts with a magnetic field. In devices such as generators, motors, inductors, and transformers. Most coils take the form of a toroidal coil or spiral. Wire coils are used in conjunction with a magnet to produce powerful electromagnetism.
The more turns of the wire, the stronger the magnetic field. Coils generate vortexes which in turn create an electromagnetic field. It's all one interconnected system. And we see it everywhere. This is what columns and rotundas were used for.
Powerful coils to generate electromagnetism and carry the current in loops. The torus is found at the base of pretty much every column found throughout our realm. It is everywhere. Look at the movement of electricity through a wire and the simultaneous magnetic field it produces. This is exactly the shape of a column and we see this present in all of these gigantic and meticulously crafted columns.
This is why we see the magnetic field represented at the top of a lot of columns. It's the movement of the ions in the magnetic field. It's the movement of the toroid and the toroidal vortex. As you saw, coils of copper wire are essential in electrifying the magnet. And I know what you want to say.
That's great but the columns and other structures you are referring to, are made of stone. But you see, all of these impossible structures are made from a mixture of stone and metal. They used iron bars in their construction. Iron is magnetic. These iron rods run throughout the stone infrastructure and are complemented with copper and gold ruthen.
Copper and gold are strong conductors of electricity. Often we find entire statues, arches, domes, and roofing made from a distinctive blue copper. Furthermore, the limestone, granite, and dolomite stone is mixed with crystal silicon or quartz. Quartz has strong electric potential. The colonnades and arches we see everywhere were at once integral components to the overall electromagnetic infrastructure.
While also constructed in geometric forms that mirror the flow of electromagnetic energy such as coil loops, horseshoe magnetic fields, and toroidal vortexes. As with everything else constructed in the old world, they were both functional and crafted as a homage to that function. A lot of ethereal energy was stored in structures constructed from red bricks and concrete. Red bricks and concrete are excellent conductors of electricity. They operated as huge capacitors or batteries.
According to new research, red bricks can be converted into energy storage units. They can be charged to hold electricity like a battery and can store energy until required for powering devices. The key to this battery like function inherent within red brick is the iron oxide. The development and use of red brick is so important and we will be returning to this subject much later in our journey. The really big red brick power stations and batteries were designated and recognizable by their white stripes such as saintpancrest railway station in london, and many other famous structures.
We still carry this red and white stripe designation of power stations today and it is also an indicator for the magnet. Some were constructed of blue, black, and brown with white stripes. Towers, obelisks, and small clock towers functioned as the intermediate capacitors or batteries to store, distribute, and provide energy throughout the grid. The entire flat realm earth was connected as one whole grid. A complex interconnected system of free energy production, spherical mass.
Our historical ancestors knew that the earth they walked upon was Our historical ancestors knew that the earth they walked upon was flat. This type of futuristic technological advancement is the result of a civilization knowing exactly what type of earth they lived upon. They were not subject to the same satanic deceptions and abuses as we are. They were not raised believing they existed on a lonely globular rock spinning in the vacuum of space. The true ethereal electromagnetic properties of the earth were not hidden from them.
They knew there was a domed firmament above their heads. They studied it. They imitated its properties and understood its central relationship with the entire ethereal existence of electromagnetism. They revered the magnificence of its craft and showed utmost gratitude to the source, to God, and the ethereal Holy Spirit for giving them everything they needed. Look.
Have you seen anything as overwhelmingly exquisite as this before? How have we lived our entire lives and not seriously considered the impossibility of these structures? How have we lived our entire lives walking amongst the skeletons of the future long forgotten. I know this is all a lot to take in. And I know that the picture has not formed properly in your mind yet.
It is hard to imagine an interconnected electromagnetic power grid of this size across the earth, and the technical nature of electromagnetism doesn't help. And I know that you're full of questions. Who were these people or beings that built these structures? Where did they go? And why were the power grids deactivated?
What about all the religious iconography and art we see inside of the cathedrals and mosques? What about all the histories and romans and the greeks? What about some of the grand mosques that have been constructed in recent times? And if what you're telling me is true, then how did they distribute and store all of this energy like you say? Was it similar to our wifi and radio signals?
We will get to all of these in good time. We have barely scratched the surface but for now it is the last question that is important. How did they distribute and store all of this energy? And in what form? For you see, our sophisticated historical ancestors did something that we, as a society, have come to neglect.
They watched the water and they watched it closely. Right here on earth and up above, beyond the firmament. Come on. Let me show you. Tip tap goes the rain, spitting on my windowpane.
Drip drip from the trees. Sodden earthy and soggy leaves. Splash splash puddle pools jumping on their way to schools. Onomatopoeia. The formation or use of words that imitate the sounds associated with the object or actions they refer to.
The property of a word of sounding like what it represents. Water has many. The interdependent relationship between water and sound is so fundamental to our connection and understanding of water. The rain patters and drums. The waves roar.
The brook murmurs and whispers. The puddles of mud squelch, that it is intrinsically woven into the very linguistic code of our language. Many have explored the powerful connection between sound and water. We have Masuro Emoto and his study exploring the impact of sound on the molecular structure of water. We have those that like to play around with cymatics.
There is peter davey, a saxophone player who invented a device that boils water with sonic waves. The innovative use of sound coupled with water seems to have no end. So much so that in recent times, biologists are discovering that ultrasonic water can even treat the most resistant of infections and heal wounds at rapid pace. And in a future where electromagnetism was harnessed with the utmost innovation, water, sound, and frequency, had to have a major role to play, and of course, it did. They wanted us to know they did.
And not just the water here on earth. They were telling us to look up and above. They wanted us to know that what they had achieved right here on earth was only possible because they had studied what existed above. In the beginning, god created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void.
And darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the spirit of god moved upon the face of the waters. And god said, let there be light. And there was light. And god said, let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters.
And let it divide the waters from the waters. And god made the firmament and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament, and it was so. Some criticize the king james translation of the bible for its use of the word firmament. But in the original hebrew, the word is rakia, which translates directly as firmament. In the new international version, it is called the vault.
In the English standard version, it is an expanse. In the good news translation, it is dome. What is important however, is that in all translations and in the original Hebrew, the notion of the firmament or vault separating the waters above from the waters below does not change and remains consistent. Realm. The telescope is an interesting instrument.
Both at once an apparatus for discovery and simultaneously a weapon of deceit. There are 2 primary types of telescope, the refractor and the reflector. A refractor uses an objective lens, usually a convex lens, and a reflector utilizes a single or a combination of curved mirrors to reflect light and form an image. Many reflected telescopes use either a concave mirror or a parabolic mirror. This is what a reflection looks like in these mirrors.
The eyes we were born with and which we see the world through are convex lenses. We do not witness the world through curved mirror reflections. This is jupiter as seen through a reflecting newtonian telescope, and despite the slight spherical distortion caused by the reflective mirrors, this is still not what nasa has shown us. Your mind immediately sees a planet because you have been programmed since birth to associate an image like this with the notion of a planet. Just in the same way you associate the moon with a ball of rock by default.
But as you can see here, both refracting and reflecting telescopes produce images similar to the nikon p900. The nikon lenses have been criticized by some astronomers as lacking the power to really see the luminaries above but as you can see here, there is not much difference between the nikon and both types of telescope, and in each, we see that jupiter is radiating some kind of light of its own. Both amateur and professional astronomers present footage such as this. But look what happens next. The astronomers here are using imaging processing software to turn their raw images and footage which display a circular object in the sky above us radiating its own light into a nasa style planet.
And this type of doctored processed image is not what we see with our own eyes through these lenses. I am not saying that this is deliberate deception. Astronomy is a practice of its own but it is very important to never confuse the highly edited images and footage we receive with reality. And it is also worth being mindful of those that are being very manipulative. They are usually the astronomers with the paid sponsorship from magazines and websites.
It is also important to note that what we call planets are not actually planets. They are wandering stars and all of the wandering stars are of a similar nature to the moon. Unlike the rest of the stars above our firmament, their course and journey above us is not fixed and consistent. Their paths deviate from the concentric paths that the rest of the stars consistently make around Polaris. And the reason for this is because they are not located within the waters beyond the firmament.
They are very different and their function is way more a cult and their significance to life here on earth much more important than we realize. We will be returning to the true nature of the so called planets and moon later. Back to the waters. Arcturus is one of the brightest stars in the sky. Here is science magazine's artistic impression of the star, and now here is arcturus as seen through a refracting telescope.
There is no resemblance. What we see through this telescope footage is really similar to what we see when you zoom in on the stars above with a powerful nikon camera. Many criticize the refracting telescope because it can produce chromatic aberration. Chromatic aberration is a failure of the lens to focus all color to the same point. The result can be purple fringing and we see that here.
Photographs can suffer from chromatic aberration. Interestingly, the nikon does not produce the same chromatic aberration when zooming in on arcturus. Therefore, you could say that the nikon is actually more reliable and stable. Through both the telescopic lens and the nikon, arcturus is pulsing, shifting, rippling. It is dancing geometry.
Many will jump up from their seats and exclaim, it's because of atmospheric distortion and light pollution. It's because arcturus is so far away. The sonoluminescence in the water above. They are self illuminating. Radiating their own light and frequencies in the waters above.
Our own convex lens eyes tell us that there is some kind of water above. We see it in the stars and when rockets accidentally hit the firmament. And like I said before, just because the so called planets are wandering stars and the moon appear spherical, does not mean they are. They are not synonymous with the stars in the water beyond. They are something else entirely.
Our advanced predecessors wanted us to watch the stars. They wanted us to understand that electromagnetic vibration and frequency produce pockets of sonoluminescence in the waters above. They were pointing it out because they wanted us to know that water was the key to unlocking the real potential of electromagnetic energy. They wanted us to know that once harnessed, the ethereal electromagnetic energy could be fused with water so it could be stored and distributed. And once produced, the water could be manipulated, enhanced, and elevated to a level of new possibilities through the use of vibration, frequency, and sound itself.
Their civilization depended on the industry of what we will call the living waters. Their technological advancement enabled them to transform the entire earth into a power grid, but this grid was only possible because of water. The civilization of the future was an electromagnetic water world. Canals are no great secret. They are found everywhere across our realm.
Both the great and the small. Most of the great canals around our earth are connected to the ocean. Salt water is an excellent conductor of electricity. Sodium chloride is ionized. We have the corinth canal connected to the egean sea.
We have the panama canal that connects both the atlantic and pacific oceans. The suez canal connects with the mediterranean sea, and there is the volga don canal connecting the azov sea, caspian sea, and black sea with the major oceanic networks. All of the canals built before the 1920s were not built by us or those in the history books. We inherited them. And while the official narrative tells us that the vulgar don was finished during the 1950s, its construction actually began back in the 16th century.
All narrative surrounding the construction of these canals is purely fabricated, and I will show you how much later in our journey. Once you start paying attention, it becomes very evident that most continents and countries feature a combination of canals and rivers that span the entirety of the land itself. The citizens of the old world utilize the oceans and rivers to create a grid of interconnected waterways, To provide water to all of their areas of habitation. In order to pass difficult sections and keep the supply going, they would build aqueducts and viaducts. Sometimes these were constructed with the purpose of energizing the symmetrical archival structures.
The romans did not build these structures. The entire infrastructure of so many cities found across our entire The entire infrastructure of so many cities found across our realm, are designed around canal systems. Look at Amsterdam from above. The precise geometric grid lines here are not roads. They are canals, and the sole purpose was to supply water from one area to another.
The water was stored and manipulated for a variety of purposes in reservoirs, water towers, pumping stations, systems, and other structures. The water also functions to provide necessary balance. A complex grid of electromagnetic production, distribution, and consumption would generate a lot of heat and magnetism. Water provided not only a balance of diamagnetism but also ensured the entire grid did not overheat. When looking at all the magnificent generators and other instruments of power from the old world, we can always find water nearby or the remains of water storage.
Sometimes this is hidden primarily on the ground. Many do not realize that many so called victorian cisterns and reservoirs run very far under a lot of our cities, and other times it is a central characteristic feature of these structures. An example of which is what the controllers have redesignated as castle moats. The electromagnetic water grid was not just an energized version of what we are already familiar with in our cities and towns. It was much, much, much more.
It was way more magnificent, impressive, and futuristic than we could even imagine. The grid was connected to central bigger power stations or what is more appropriately termed star stations. Sometimes these were isolated stations and other times they comprise entire cities. We are going to have to fly to a higher altitude for this. I need to show you.
Hold on tight now and keep your eyes open. Look. The sole existence, let alone construction of these star structures, is almost beyond our comprehension. As you saw, they are found everywhere across our realm with undeviating geometric consistency, a wondrous impossibility. Perhaps they had some kind of technology that allowed them to view huge areas of land from above while planning and building.
They were never forced. That is a fairy tale invented by our controllers. The stunning geometric precision and symmetry of the star structures would most likely have functioned to enhance the power of the generators and to the water or turn the water into living energized water. We can see from comparing some of these ruined sites and some left a little more intact, that water would have been present throughout the structure. Before the controllers destroyed and drained most of these structures, they were full of water.
They were connected to rivers and canals and the oceans. They were a key component of the entire power grid. The star structures are fractals of symmetrical geometry. Just like many of the ceilings of these huge energy generators, and like the acoustic cavity magnetrons and resonators, the symmetrical sharp diagonal walls would have caused the ions to perpetually vibrate. Old plans and illustrations which have no doubt been edited or manipulated in some way or another, offer suggestion as to how complex, integrated, and essential the star geometry was to the entire grid.
Look at paris here. It isn't obvious at first glance but upon closer inspection, we come to realize that the entirety of paris was itself a star station or a star city. And like with everything else constructed in the old world, these structures were at once functional and the celebration of the source of their innovation. Look closer at the star geometry here. Can you see the resemblance?
The snowflake. Do you remember what happened in masura and moto's experiment on water? Ethereal vibration expressing itself through water's molecular structure. Those of the old world had perfected this science. They knew the key to releasing electromagnetism's potential was through sound and water.
Just imagine what they were able to achieve. Sound vibration and frequency was just as integral to the success of their technology as water was. Those of the old world did not hide their adoration for sound. Traces of this love for sound are everywhere. These structures were literally instruments of power or as the so called gerta put it so succinctly elsewhere.
Music is liquid architecture. Architecture is frozen music. This is why so many generators, capacitors, power stations, and intermediates feature holes, pediments, dentils, indentations, and complex 3 d ornamentation. They were structural openings to manipulate sound waves, the vibrations, and acoustics so they could tune the electromagnetic energy in conjunction with the water in a variety of ways to achieve different results. They were similar to the aerophone instruments such as the flute, the pipe, the recorder, the bassoon, and the trumpet.
The old world revered the geometry of the star because it was through the study of the stars in the waters above that they learned the power of fusing electromagnetism, vibration, and frequency with water itself. They all work harmoniously and in concert with one another. This interconnected and interdependent energetic relationship is what makes the stars and all life itself possible in the first place. Look a little closer at the dancing geometry of the sonoluminescent stars beyond the firmament. Do they remind you of something else?
That's right. All of the magnetrons of what we've come to call rose windows were designed to mirror the cymatic patterns of ether's vibrations in water itself. Artist tanya harris was onto something in 2013 when she turned her attention to studying and recording the silent resonant frequency of churches. By placing water inside of a loudspeaker, she was able to discover the hidden geometry of these resonant frequencies. The results showed that even the silence within these structures produce strong cymatic patterns.
And again, can you see the resemblance? Others have applied the same technique and studied the cymatic patterns displayed when bells chimed within the structures. Look at the patterns. Magnetrons. This is why so many magnificent rose windows resemble cymatic patterns so closely.
This is why they look like the petrified pulsations of a star. The entire ceilings of many cathedrals also mirror this sacred climatic geometry. This is why so many of the structures contain huge bells and chiming clocks. The tolling bells would emit powerful vibrations and frequencies and influence an entire area's water supply. The sound would influence the molecular structure of the water which was then used for a variety of purposes.
And that's not all. Many of these structures also housed another wonder of the world. The organ. Have you ever stopped to look at some of the great organs before? These were not constructed by ordinary people in the 19th, 18th, 17th, and 16th centuries.
Like the structures they reside in, they are a marvel of elegance and majesty. The most powerful sound instrument in the world. The specific organ sound waves of low and higher frequencies would no doubt have enabled those of the old world to manipulate the ethereal energy in ways they saw fit. The magnetron rose windows that would not have contained glass would amplify these sound waves, which in turn would influence the molecular structure and properties of the etherized living water. Organs would have had multiple uses.
Perhaps provided entire towns with specific resonant frequencies for good health and prosperity. The specific functions of the organ have been deliberately hidden and withheld from our knowledge. Interestingly, the official history states that the first organs of the world were water organs in which the power source push in the air is derived by water from a natural source or by a manual pump. No doubt a deceptive half truth disguising the instruments true interaction with water. And like I said before, most of these structures had areas nearby to store and hold large quantities of water.
Many of the structures feature underground cavities or huge cisterns. Some of which have been drained and some kept intact. Sometimes the system was located apart from and outside of the structure. The controllers have redesignated many of these areas as roman baths. That's why bath cathedral in England is located right next to the roman baths.
The water was also stored in red brick power stations, capacitors, or water towers. Open rectangular sites, reservoirs, wells, and step wells. This is why step wells were constructed with precise geometric patterns. Again, the symmetrical structures here work to encourage oscillation or vibration of the ions. They kept the water electromagnetically charged, and the aqueducts and viaducts would have worked in a similar fashion.
It is likely that a lot of the huge electromagnets we see scattered across our realm would have actually straddled passing water. Much like we see on the vulgar dawn canal even though it's unlikely that the vulgar arch is original, and that many roads themselves were constructed during the great reset. It is likely that the inheritors of the 19th century were instructed to drain and fill many of the tributaries of once carried water. That's why we see drained castle moats and star stations. Perhaps that's what a lot of the surplus mud we see during this period was used for.
Perhaps a lot of homes and buildings were were constructed with underground chambers to store their own personal supply of living water. And these areas were destroyed, filled in, and forever hidden with vast amounts of mud during the 19th century. The use of electromagnetism, sound waves, and water, would have had endless applications and uses in the old world. Most of which we will never know about. But many structural remains do offer a lot of clues.
The abundance of remarkable and impossible stately homes, halls, and manners found throughout our realm, all point to the mass scale farming practices of the old world. We travel miles to marvel at their beauty and grandeur but more impressive than the structures themselves are their gardens and water gardens. We have the palace of versa. Spechzingen Palace, the Royal Palace of Caserta, Niffenburg Palace, Herrenhausen Palace. Even today, they still retain much of their splendor and brilliance but it's when we look at some of the old plans of these areas that we realize just how otherworldly these sites were.
They were never constructed to house the elite. They were the farms of old. Look at the gardens. They are cymatic gardens. Even from these old illustrated plans, we can see just how gargantuous these farms were.
Microcosmic grid systems suggestive of the entire larger power grid itself. The cymatic gardens were likely grids cultivated with sound and the living water to grow food, herbs, and who knows what else. Even contemporary scientists openly acknowledge that sound waves strongly influenced the growth of fruit, vegetables, and crops. And to this day, some of these structures retain a lot of their glory when viewed from above. The palace of the sky.
A wondrous geometric marvel. A collection of impossible structures, extraordinary cymatic gardens, and cymatic gardens, and water systems. Let's venture closer into the palace of the sai and have a look. Hold on now. Wait, what?
This is not the palace of the sai. I really need to fix this thing. It's been acting up a lot lately. Where are we? Wait a minute.
I recognize this place. Memories from a long time ago. This is chatsworth house in the peak district england. Oh well. This should do.
Come on. Let's see what we can find. Chatsworth house was completed in 17 08, we are told. Its story, much like the story of the entire peep district is a fabrication, a complete lie. The place has changed much over the years.
It is situated beneath 2 large bodies of water, the emperor and swiss lake. The water from the lakes is channeled across a broken aqueduct before falling 79 feet and meandering gently down the hills, in complex waterways, and running right into chatsworth estate. The waters feed the estate's own lakes, rivers, and streams through a series of runways, and a multitude of complex tunnels beneath the estate and the structure itself. Due to the estate's repurposing, much of this remains hidden but you can see the tunnels quite clearly here, snaking their way down. It is one interconnected water system.
Waterways deliver themselves into waterfalls at the impressive rockery before continuing on their journey. All of the water gathers into a central rectangular front piece which feeds the emperor fountain. The water then continues underground until it pours into the river derwent, A 66 mile long tributary of the river trench which runs throughout the peak district. While much of the estate has undergone some serious restoration which is actually a fancy deceptive word for criminal gutting and destruction of technology, there are a lot of haunting remains of its former glory. It is important to note that unlike many of the huge energy generators, chatsworth house was probably partially occupied by farmers that is.
The central engine was located off-site and has been subsequently removed and repurposed as a larder to store hunted game. This magnificent, gorgeous structure would have functioned as a small generator which also contained a small engine in its center. It was repurposed as the stables. The horses of the 19th century clearly lived better lives than most of the population. Above, atop of the hill next to the emperor and swiss lake, we can see the quadruple capacitor or water tower.
This was repurposed as a hunting tower. But stalking the 105 acre grounds, a visitor with eyes to see might spot some unusual sights. One of which is the half ruined obelisk hidden away in the tangled overgrowth at the bottom of the hill below the lake. The official controlled history that visitors receive when touring chatsworth conveniently leaves out any mention of the obelisk. For you see, the hunting tower was not chatsworth's only capacitor.
The entire estate needed constant water storage to fulfill its energetic requirements and purposes. There are many odd structures dotted around that remain unexplained. And then there is this, the cascade, a true little wonder. The dome, a series of toroidal circles that rise to meet the smaller copper dome. They tread carefully here making sure they force a distorted history on you but as always they cannot help themselves, they just have to tell you in their own roundabout controlled manner.
As the placard states, water can be made to flow over the roof and out of 13 spouts. Some of these spouts are crafted in the form of immaculate stone dolphins and giant fish. There are even hidden jets in the floor, they tell us. The water is received from the lakes above and is used twice more in its journey to meet the river derwent below. Once in the south lawn fountain and again the private west garden.
But look closer at what they acknowledge. Each step of the cascade is different from the one below and above it, to vary the sound of the falling water. This was allegedly built in 1703. Why would an 18th century people be concerned with varying the sound of falling water? How did they even have the knowledge and skills to manipulate the sound of water like this?
And it's everywhere in the estate. The waterways, streams, and rivers all meander gently down to rest briefly at ponds and lakes before continuing their journey toward the river Derwent. Their journey is one of such splendid sounds. As you begin to traverse the labyrinthine passages of our corrupted history, you will inevitably meet the lithographs, renderings, engravings, illustrations, and paintings. How easy it is to lie when there is no photographic or visual evidence.
Just artistic interpretation. We would never accept illustrations as reliable sources of information today so why do we accept them as historically accurate? And while these are not to be trusted, the voting sometimes are browsing their particulars can yield some interesting insights. For instance, the fountain here looks wildly out of proportion. Did it used to jet water more powerfully?
And some would claim artistic exaggeration. But if you dig a little deeper, you come to learn that the original emperor fountain constructed in 1843, was able to jet water at a height of 296 feet. What? How? This is the 19th century we're talking about.
And like I said, they cannot help themselves. Even wikipedia states that the water power of the fountain found a practical use in generating chatsworth's electricity. There it is. Barely hidden in plain sight and as we continue browsing these little illustrations we stumble across it. An old engraving of chatsworth from above.
Look at the size of this. Cymatic gardens. Rows and rows of crops. Large bodies of water that are no longer there. And again, many would claim artistic exaggeration.
The unreliability, and inaccuracy of illustrations, and rightly so. But when we look at chatsworth from above on Google earth, what is this we find? Shadows on the ground across from the river? No. These are the markings of old infrastructure that was torn down.
The marking suggests there was once a bridge here. A bridge we see in the illustration. Look a little closer. An octagon with the clear outline of an old generator. So yes, the illustration is a lie.
The estate was much much larger than depicted here. In 2018, there was a heat wave in england and the old markings of chatsworth's former glory started appearing in the grounds themselves. They had to acknowledge it. Sometimes mud and lies are not enough to bury the truth. Chatsworth was a huge farm in the old world.
As I said before, the illustrations and paintings are not to be trusted. More often than not, they are used as tools of deception against us. But as you see here, they do have a tendency to backfire on the controllers. Just like with the plans of star stations and cities, our own technological access to tools such as Google earth, validate these old plans and illustrations as half truths. You can bet good money that even the plans and illustrations are only given us a fraction of the full picture.
Just like here with the plan of chatsworth. And it's in chatsworth that we encounter the first of many acts of barbaric desecration by the hands of the enemy. Chatsworth's great conservatory stood immense until destroyed in 1920. It was 84 meters long and 20 meters high and constructed, they say, in 18/40 before the establishment of automatic glass manufacturing. Huge interconnected tunnels and water pipes collected under the ground of the structure to provide heating via boilers and hot water.
An engineering feat as impossible as the construction of the structure itself. It was designed by chatsworth's gardener, joseph paxton. Paxton is a phantom that haunts the pages of the history books. Paxton's story is one of fortunate circumstance, daring innovation and success. It is unfortunately a dishonest story, an unconvincing fiction.
We are told that paxton secured a gardening role when he was 20 years old while working at chiswick gardens, and it was here that he encountered william cavendish, the duke of devonshire, who was so impressed by young paxton's horticultural abilities that he hired him as head gardener of chatsworth house. Paxton is responsible for creating the following. Chatsworth arboretum, it's rockery, the emperor fountain. You remember the fountain that sprayed water into the air at twice the height of nelson's column. The great conservatory.
He was responsible for cultivating the cavendish banana. The most consumed banana in the world today, and designing railway stations all over the peak districts. What a talented and productive young man. Paxton's achievements however, did not end with the banana and the conservatory. The fast doesn't end here.
What a tangled web we weave when setting out to deceive. Paxton's success with Chatsworth led him to design the infamous crystal palace of London just in time for the great exhibition of 1851. It was originally constructed in hyde park for the fair. It was constructed in just over a year. An engineering feat never again repeated.
It was made from more than a 1000 iron bars and its overall mass comprised of over 4,000 tons of iron. The chance brothers glass works in smethwick provided the 300,000 sheets of glass. Remember, this was before automatic glass manufacturing. This is the glassworks in which the glass was produced. A simple maths equation gives us an average of 822 glass paints produced every day, 7 days a week, for a year.
Right here in this factory. This was paxton's initial plan sketch for the structure. He went from this to this in a year. Furthermore, the entire crystal palace was able to house gigantic trees and they had to board a lot of the glass panes up and cover a lot of the top of the structure during the world's fair exhibition because the interior of the structure became too hot. Wouldn't paxton who designed the chatsworth conservatory know that a huge glass palace would produce immense heat.
The entire narrative soon dissolves into stupidity when we realize that a year later in 1852, they dismantled the crystal palace and moved the entire structure to sydneym in southeast london where it was rebuilt with 2 additional huge water towers at either end of the monstrous structure. Interestingly, no photographic evidence of the original hyde park palace exists. Just illustrations. Wouldn't the structure have been the focus of many photographers during the opening of the great exhibition of 1851, the first of its kind? It is highly likely there were either 2 of these crystal palaces in london and both destroyed or the high park palace is just an outright lie.
Interestingly, a few years after its relocation to sydneym, this map of the palace was produced. All designed at the hand of our genius gardener. He struggled with the water supply, we are told. After all, supplying 12,000 fountains 2 of which shot water 250 feet into the air, and the various cascades would be a difficult task to achieve. But clearly not for paxton.
He made it happen. Interestingly, the crystal palace also featured one of these impossible, grand, and spectacular organs. Oh, and if that wasn't enough, while mrpaxton was redesigning the crystal palace at sydneym, he was also designing the glorious mentmore towers for none other than maya rosschild. Who would have thought that a random young 20 something gardener would go on to be responsible for some of the most impossible and impressive engineering feats in history. Let's also not forget about his banana.
Paxton is an example of the enemy's laziness when it comes to hiding our true history. It is not fathomable or even possible for the citizens of the 19th century to have even built these structures, let alone assign their inception to 1 soul man. The crystal palace and its gardens, just like chatsworth, were huge farming grids that used to live in water in conjunction with sound and electromagnetic energy to cultivate a whole range of wondrous produce. Kew gardens in london is another example. The abundant electromagnetic energy was able to produce conditions of heat with ease and the vibrational frequencies encourage growth.
Perhaps that's why crystal palace housed a grand organ. Utilizing frequencies and vibrations to enable the growth of produce. And that's why the controllers were able to assign the cultivation of the banana, an exotic fruit, to a fabricated englishman. The technology already established in england was able to grow many things with ease. Among other impressive horticultural achievements attributed to paxton's genius were the perfect pineapples, another tropical fruit he grew at chatsworth.
He grew enormous lily pads which could hold the weight of a human. He grew gigantic sequoia redwoods at chatsworth which usually only thrive in humid conditions. He grew them with ease and many of these redwoods remain today. A spectacular sight to behold. It's probably worth noting that among paxton's many other talents, wikipedia also tells us that he became quite skilled in moving gigantic trees, as well as gigantic crystal palaces.
The largest of these trees weigh in 7,000 kilograms. How? With horse and cart? Why are humans so gullible? They destroyed the beautiful and impossible chatsworth conservatory in 1920.
As the duke's son said in a letter to his father, they blew off well over 200 pounds of explosives to tear it down. So it must have been well built. The structures of the old world were built to stand for centuries. What a great shame. The lies surrounding the peak district do not end with paxton.
The entire national park was 1 gigantic interconnected electromagnetic water system of the old world. It was most likely one of britain's primary suppliers of farming goods. The national park boasts one of the largest collections of stately homes, halls, and manors. All of which would have functioned as huge farms. It was also a regional retreat that specialized in healing.
Yes, that's right. Healing. The peak district is home to 2 large towns, matlock and buxton. Buxton is famous for its bottled water and matlock is renowned for its historical baths. Even today, both towns boast an enviable collection of old world structures.
We see an abundance of old generators, domed pavilion structures, capacitors, colonnades, columns, bandstands, gardens, and water systems. Overlooking the town of matlock is river castle. Its silhouetted frame and turrets stand regal in the distance. It is a derelict structure and has been derelict for over a century. The curious public are not allowed near the structure.
They tell us it was built very quickly by a mr john smedley. Smedley was, we are told, an industrialist. By the 1850s, he had become the driving force behind matlock's hydropathic industry. Hydropathy is the practice of healing and curing diseases through the use of water. The official narrative states that Smedley built Smedley's hydro, which sits on Smedley street in matlock.
It is now a government council building. Smedley's hydro was just one of the hydropathies in the region. At one point we are told, there were over 20 hydropathic establishments in the region. Just look at these structures. Smedley did not build the hydro.
Its structure and immense water tower evades his capabilities and the capabilities of all the 19th century citizens. The citizens of the 19th century peak district inherited all of this infrastructure and the controllers of our realm knew that they needed to squash any possibility of it being used for its original intended purposes, or for any of the inheritors to discover the truth. It was just too obvious and soon someone amongst a crowd might start putting 2 and 2 together. So they did what they do best and employed a puppet. But unlike paxton who was able to achieve fame and fortune for taking all of the credit, smedley had a different role to play.
A role that many puppets in our society today still play. His mission was to carefully control the introduction of hydropathy, only for it to be declared primitive or fraudulent and then subsequently buried and eradicated as a serious practice. His story is a very similar story to another enemy puppet that has gained a lot more attention over the years. I too once fell for the lies surrounding this man's story. The hydropathies were able to accommodate hundreds of patients and they were tremendously successful in curing a whole host of diseases and issues ranging from inflammation, ambilius attacks, to paralysis, rheumatism, and fevers.
This was conducted through an array of different bathing techniques. Applying dripping sheets as bandages, and fusing electricity, sound waves, and water. There were, as one newspaper reported, electric bells throughout the buildings. No doubt the actual potential of hydropathy was never fully expressed in smedley's array of hydros but they nonetheless helped people tremendously, and they were a huge success so the controllers temporarily profited financially. The hydros healed and increased the well-being of people through water and its fusion with sound, vibration, frequency, and electricity.
Look at the electric treatment menu from one of the old brochures. Options for high powered parabolic reflector, electric ionization, and high frequency treatment. Smedley also demonstrated the ability of etherized water to heat entire rooms in a profound way. The at the hydro had a water heating system built into its walls and always maintained a constant temperature of 65 degrees. Even when the room was filled with a crowd of 350 or so visitors.
The temperature never deviated. How was this kind of technology available in the 19th century and yet today we do not have access to this kind of sophisticated heating. Historians and journalists of the time would deliberately smear Smedley. Casting hydropathy as pseudoscience comparable with homeopathy. Smedley had many battles with the burgeoning medical industry, and after his death the hydros were purchased and the structural alterations began.
Like tesla, smedley played his role and successfully introduced the science of the old world to have it debunked, tarnished, and sidelined forever. Hydropathy today is regarded as nothing more than a relaxing spa venture. All of its original applications of frequency and electricity have been eradicated from the practice. Smedley's role playing allowed the controllers to justify the entire water grid system of the peak district. Successfully preventing the current 19th century and further subsequent generations from questioning its presence.
The remains of the grid today are so evident. You can sit and relax to the soothing sound of water falling over the turreted regal derwent reservoir which connects the entire region through its branching rivers and canals. You can stroll around shopping inside of old power stations, and at old pumping stations, and in every area of the region there are wonders waiting to be discovered. Not only in the larger towns do we find old fountains that once provided the living waters but also in the remote villages. Tucked away we find an old dry fountain.
Look. The lord's gift. A bittersweet joy to behold. The citizens of the old world unlock the power of electromagnetic water by studying the stars above in the firmament. The stars above taught them that the key to manipulating the ethereal energy they harnessed from the ionosphere, was through water, sound waves, vibration, and frequency.
They honored this gift by constructing domes, by crafting star cities, cymatic magnetrons, and praising the lord and holy spirit for the living waters they received in return. They understood the firmament as both scientists and disciples. Viewer, I am hoping the picture is starting to become clearer in your mind, and you will inevitably start to see things in a different light when pondering all of these impossible structures. It is not a coincidence that some structures like the coliseum are also referred to as amphitheaters. Have you seen them from above?
They look like speakers. Amphitheatre is an interesting word. An amp is a unit of electric current and an amplifier is a device that increases signal especially microwaves and audio. And no doubt you will start to put 22 together in terms of some of the inventions that we were allowed to play around with before they were discarded as antique in their efficiency, but time is of the essence. We could ponder examples of the old world's electromagnetic water grid system for hours but I encourage you to get out and hunt down these structures yourself and to document them in your own time.
We have to move on. We need to stop. Wait. What? You want to know if these came from the old world?
Yes. They did. And they are extremely important. The inevitable ticking of the clock, A deeply unsettling instrument but unavoidable. I need to show you one more missing piece of the electromagnetic puzzle first, and then we will take a closer look at these time keeping instruments.
Come on. Let's keep moving. A missing piece of the puzzle. When observing the old world structures today, there is a great sense of absence and alteration. Structures have evidently been altered and changed drastically over the last 200 or so years.
And when journeying across our realm and studying these structures, a tremendous sense of absence persists. Something is missing. The concept of ethereal harvesting through these wondrous antennas is not enough. It is not concrete enough to complete the picture. Something else was once present that made the entire technological grid possible.
This of course, is the key technological component of these structures, the engine, and the central mechanisms that made them function in the first place. The engines were of course not tokamaks. A tokamak is a crude and base instrument. It is a design of the new world. It does not belong in the old world.
Possibilities of What is undeniable, however, are the parallels between the tokamak's fundamental octagonal form and the old world's love for the octagon. It is very likely that the octagonal formation is an essential component when generating a toroidal vortex. We see the octagon everywhere in the old world. Octagonal geometry underpins many of the structures fundamental formations. And the peculiar octagonal structures everywhere are not by mistake.
They are what they seem. Empty shells that once house something else. This sense of emptiness is everywhere and remains unexplained. So many towers and domes rise to smaller hollow domed cupolas. Why are they hollow?
Why would an earlier civilization waste so much time and energy constructing such a seemingly superfluous and useless structure? But they didn't, did they? A lot of these empty areas are always directly below the antennas, and although not all of these crucial empty structures are octagonal, most are, and they are always situated in key areas. Like under central antennas, beneath domed resonators, in the center of closed symmetrical courtyards or detached and just outside the bigger generators, and when reflecting on such perfectly wrought geometry, the absence is tangible. There used to be some kind of cylinder or apparatus contained within this space.
Furthermore, we also find various historical relics that closely resemble the old world structural style. In these relics, we see that empty cylinders or vessels are an integral part of the object. Could these be miniature functional objects that mirror the form of the larger empty spaces we see in the old world structures? Perhaps a kind of micro household object that enabled access to the wider power grids energy production? Did the larger structures themselves contain similar cylinders within?
In many old photographs, the cupolas and octagonal spaces are already emptied. But there do remain a few images and illustrations that can offer a little insight as to what was present before. In some we see a type of cylinder and in others we see some kind of orb or container. Due to the lack of images, it is hard to present a consistent finding. And so much has been altered and in ways that are almost impossible to recognize.
For instance, this is an 18/80 illustration of the so called completion of cologne cathedral. It focuses on the top of one of these spires. The wooden boards here are scaffolding. As you can see, the tops of these spires open revealing some kind of cylinder. This is a model area of the spire that we see in the illustration.
It was put outside of the cathedral to give tourists an idea as to just how large these spires are, an impossibility for citizens of the 19th century. The impossibility for citizens of the 19th century. The men in this illustration are not completing the final spire of the cathedral. They are removing whatever existed in the container at its apex. And it begs a question as to how many other aspects and features of these structures open in similar ways, and why do they open?
What did they contain? Interestingly Interestingly, it is esoteric and a cult that provide some clues. Alchemy was an arcane natural philosophy or protoscientific tradition. Its central focus was crosopia or the transmutation of base metals into noble metals. From its inception in ancient egyptian, greek, indian and middle eastern culture, the field of alchemy, we are told, was obsessed with turning base metals into gold and a maniacal obsession with creating the elixir of life to achieve immortality.
We have all heard of the medieval Nicholas flamel and the philosopher's stone. It is a field of inquiry steeped in a rich fabric of occultism, kabbalah mysticism, and magic. It wasn't until the mid 18th century occultism and transformed into the burgeoning field of chemistry. But there was a small occult revival during the 19th century that continued into the 20th century. In 1922, a 1922, a mysterious text was written by an equally mysterious figure.
The mystery of the cathedrals by Fulcanelli, a french alchemist, we are told. To this day the identity of falconnelli is still debated. No one knows who he truly was and like many mysterious figures in the history books, his name appears to be an anagrammatic play on words. Vulcan is a reference to Vulcan, the roman god of fire, and Eli a reference to El, the Canaanite word for god. It is evidently a work of 1 or more freemasons.
But nonetheless, it's alchemical reading of the wondrous and magnificent structures we call cathedrals is potently original and offers many insights and half truths. And it's in Falcinelli's reading of the statue of Ophiras that was taken from Notre Dame Cathedral and destroyed that he begins to offer the reader some truths. As the legend goes, Ophiras was a strong giant but with a dull mind. His intentions were always good. He wanted to serve the most powerful king on earth.
He was sent to the court of a mighty king to serve him. One day, the king hearing a singer say the devil's name made a sign of the cross with terror. Why do you make that sign? Ophorus asked. Because I fear fear the devil, the king replied.
If you fear him, you are not as powerful as him, Ophorus reasoned. I want to serve the devil. And so he did and enrolled among Satan's servants. One day the servants met a cross by the side of the road and the devil ordered them to turn around. Why is that?
The curious offerus asked. Because I fear the image of Christ, the devil replied. If you fear him you are not as powerful as him, Ophorus reasoned. I want to enter the service of Christ, Ophorus exclaimed and passed by the cross and went on his way. On his way, Ophorus met a hermit.
He asked the hermit where he could find Christ. Everywhere, the hermit replied. The hermit knew the type of dull giant he was dealing with and he knew he would not take to prayer. So he led off for us to a violent river and said, the poor people who have crossed this water have drowned. Stay here and carry them on your strong shoulders.
If you do this, Christ will recognize you as his servant. And so he did. Ophorus spent his days and nights carrying people across the river. 1 night overwhelmed with fatigue, Ophiras received a knock on his door. It was a child who wanted to cross.
Ophiras took him on his shoulders and began crossing the river. But as he reached the middle, the river became a furious torrent. The waves swelled and Ophorus began to buckle. In fear of letting the child fall, Ophorus uprooted a tree to lean on, but the child was becoming heavier and heavier. Ophiras began to fear the child would drown.
He lifted his head up and asked, child, why do you make yourself so heavy? It seems to me that I carry the world. The child replied, not only do you carry the world, you carry the one that made the world. I am Christ. As a reward I baptize you in the name of the father, in my own name, and in the name of of the Holy Spirit.
From now on you will be called Christopher. Christopher walked the earth for the rest of his days to teach the word of Christ. Christopher, the one who bears Christ for the masses. In his focus on offerus, however, Fulcanelli reveals a certain key to unlock another layer of meaning in the legend symbolic expression. In his enigmatic manner Falcinelli writes, Christopher stands for Christo who carries the gold.
From then on, we better understand the great importance of the symbol so eloquent of Saint Christopher. It is the hieroglyph of solar sulfur, Jesus, or the nascent gold.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
If you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” by now it’s bc you. are. not. intelligent. https://t.co/bM8pCpfWUs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Conspiracy theories, once relegated to fringe spaces, have entered mainstream political discourse, fueled by figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Donald Trump. Some claim that "common sense is a conspiracy now" and urge people to "unlearn" established narratives about events like the JFK and MLK assassinations, 9/11, and World War II.
These theories allege a "deep state," a "new world order," or a "secret cabal" of pedophiles in Washington are undermining America. Some name "the Jews," the Clintons, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Anthony Fauci as the real controllers. Specific conspiracies include Jewish space lasers, 9/11 as an inside job, Sandy Hook as a false flag, and Michelle Obama being a man.
These claims are dismissed as "lies," "insanity," "madness," and "hogwash." Some believe the government is evil, satanic, and intentionally creating mass psychoses through public education and media manipulation. They accuse the media of using increasingly violent and sinister tactics to maintain control.
The spread of misinformation is seen as a battle for the soul, where people are psychologically conditioned to believe anything, even against their own instincts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Used to be that the kind of stuff we're hearing from Marjorie Taylor Greene and Donald Trump was the guy at the end of the bar. He had a conspiracy theory he wanted to tell you about, and you can kind of laugh him off when there were dark corners of the Internet where it lived. But now it's been elevated to the center of the political discourse.
Speaker 1: Start your tape right now because I'm about to tell you the truth.
Speaker 0: You can trust us. We are telling the truth.
Speaker 1: And f you if you can't handle the truth.
Speaker 2: These storms are coming for all of us, especially due to the climate crisis, and we need our people to have faith in institutions like FEMA.
Speaker 3: Can we trust you? Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: We need the people to have faith in their government.
Speaker 0: Don't believe the lies on the Internet. Stop spreading these lies and conspiracy theories. All of these are lies. Truth is painful often, and the truth is complicated.
Speaker 4: Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. Right?
Speaker 0: Why at a gut level do people wanna believe in conspiracy theories?
Speaker 5: Right wing conspiracy theorists. Actually research showing that people who believe conspiracies would actually be willing to engage in a conspiracy themselves.
Speaker 0: Conspiracy that does not exist.
Speaker 3: Let me tell you, if you are not a conspiracy theorist by now, it's because you are not intelligent.
Speaker 6: This is a denoted.
Speaker 7: It is a stable of so called conspiracy theories that the highest levels of politics and finance, there is a shadowy cabal of pedophiles who use their power to hide the crimes they commit against children. Because pedophiles are the easiest people to blackmail. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was.
Speaker 0: It's all fake.
Speaker 8: We will continue to provide everything you need to know. He could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control Right. Exactly what people think.
Speaker 6: And that is the that is
Speaker 8: our job. We will continue to be your single source of truth. You need to unlearn everything you have learned about JFK's assassination.
Speaker 3: You need to unlearn everything that you have learned about MLK's assassination.
Speaker 6: You need to unlearn everything that you have learned about MLK's assassination. You need to unlearn everything that
Speaker 3: you have learned about MLK's assassination. Assassination. You need to unlearn everything that you have learned about MLK's assassination. You need to unlearn everything that you were taught about 911, everything that you think you know about the Vietnam War, World War 2. The truth is that the government is evil and that the government is worse than evil.
I wanna be clear. The government is satanic.
Speaker 6: I've been hearing
Speaker 0: a lot about misinformation lately. Lies on social media are they distorting people's minds. We can't think anymore in this country.
Speaker 3: Don't be a conspiracy theorist, guys. No. Actually, be a conspiracy theorist because the conspiracy theorist
Speaker 6: are telling you the truth. What they are trying to tell you is that common sense is a conspiracy now. These are dead number.
Speaker 3: Things are growing more sinister because they're losing control where people are starting to wake up, where people are starting to realize that all the things that they believe to be conspiracy theories in the past are in fact true. We are fighting real evil in this country. We're fighting real evil all over the world. And so the media is doing everything desperate to maintain control and to maintain order. In their desperation, they are growing increasingly more violent, increasingly more sinister, increasingly more psychopathic.
You guys, you need to wake up. Heard a larger attempt to
Speaker 0: to trick and scare donors and and and basically to sort of whisk them into an alternate reality. Right? Choose your own reality. It's very hard to negate these lies with the truth. Outright, brazen, dangerous, ludicrous lies.
It really is a disgusting set of lies.
Speaker 9: That is simply not true either. What the hell heck are they talking about? Stop it. It's outrageous. It's just not true.
Now the claims are getting even more bizarre.
Speaker 3: Following the assassination of JFK, the CIA said, okay. We need to start paying journalists to repeat our talking points. Now why would they
Speaker 6: do that if they didn't kill JFK? Why would they
Speaker 3: be be employing journalists? Why would our deep state begin employing journalists to repeat talking points? Why Why would they suddenly enter the term conspiracy theory into the lexicon? It never existed prior. Goddamn dead.
Never called people conspiracy theorists before sixties. Suddenly, they were the media was saying it every single day. If you don't believe what we're selling you, you're a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 8: What they're seeing on TV and what they're seeing in terms of results, is a hoax perpetrated by a cabal.
Speaker 3: The deep state
Speaker 2: By this new world order
Speaker 0: That is crazy. Insanity. It's a lurid delusion. It's a form of madness.
Speaker 3: Secret cabal. Pedophile. Here in Washington working to undermine the American people.
Speaker 0: And it is trying to censor you. They're trying to chill speech. They they're trying to silence us. To prevent the world from seeing what's really going on. Some dark story we're not getting.
Who's really controlling it all? Who exactly is the they, you think? Think for a second. Who's the they?
Speaker 8: The Jews. Always evil drink the blood of children.
Speaker 0: In the Clintons and George Soros and Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci. Vaccine conspiracy theories, false flag conspiracy theories. Michelle Obama, the man. It's a lie. It's a lie.
Like, 911 is inside job. Sandy Hook was a false flag.
Speaker 3: Fake stories of dead children,
Speaker 0: and it's heartbreaking. Oklahoma City bombing, the Boston marathon attack. Big lie in election denialism. This is fabricated. It's made up.
It's a lie. Bombing in, COVID 19. Replacement theory. Population control.
Speaker 1: Jewish space lasers. They can control the weather? People of Ohio eating dogs and cats.
Speaker 0: Transhumanism. A lot of people don't even know what that is, and they shouldn't because it's insane, bizarre, strange, outlandish, pretty homophobic, crazy conspiracy theory. That's the only word for it. Crazy. Untethered from reality, a deep wounded conspiracy,
Speaker 6: nuttiness.
Speaker 0: An antisemitism adjacent hyperventilation over globalism. It's completely ridiculous. Mind numbing, obscenity. Sheer madness. Hogwash.
Dangerous. A garbage fire. Poison.
Speaker 4: Gross and disgusting and false and misleading.
Speaker 3: Couldn't be farther from the truth.
Speaker 0: The plain fact is that there's been a complete and total epistemic breakdown among tens of millions of our fellow Americans.
Speaker 3: These people worship Satan. So if you don't believe in god, let me tell you guys something. The people you're fighting sure do. They sure do, and they pick their side. They are fully committed Satanists that we are fighting.
This is not hyperbole. You just have to have the courage to look into to real history. They began investing in understanding that they could create mass psychoses. They could quite literally lead people not to believe their own eyes. Wake up.
If you are still asleep at the wheel, wake up. This is hard. I get it. I had to go through it. I get it when you realize that everything you were told was a lie.
When you realize that you were just a severely propagandized individual from the moment that you stepped into public school system, it is a hard reckoning to go through. You suffer through periods of cognitive dissonance. You're not crazy. This is the reality. We are fighting real evil.
Why you going to church because they have you attending their church every day in the form of public education? They also understand if you keep repeating something, it eventually becomes true to people.
Speaker 8: Misinformation. Misinformation.
Speaker 0: Disinformation and misinformation.
Speaker 1: Misinformation and outright lies. Hatred and lies. They know they're lying. And the lies, to believe the crazy lies, it is a lie. Out and out lying.
It it it's it's staggering that they they can't run on the truth because they're losing on the truth. And so the lies continue. The lies get more dangerous, increasingly desperate tactics. It's it's unbelievable. Increasingly deranged talk.
Increasingly dangerous provocation.
Speaker 9: They are ridiculous. They're so stupid. It's gotta stop.
Speaker 3: They understand that that works, that people can be psychologically conditioned to believe anything if you just say enough times. They don't believe their own eyes and their own experiences. That is the power of psychology. And I don't care if I'm called the conspiracy theorist. I literally wear that as a badge of honor because we keep being proven right.
It is a battle
Speaker 0: for your soul.
Speaker 3: Science has become a religion. People will roll up their sleeves and inject things in their arm. If they're god, the experts tell them to. When their gut is screaming at them no, that's the holy spirit. Screaming at you, don't do this.
Something does not add up. They will ignore it and set it aside because, god forbid, they're called a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 6: And not everybody can be a a robot polisher.
Speaker 0: Fuck what you know. You need to forget about what you know.
Speaker 1: That's your problem. Forget about what you
Speaker 0: think you know.
Speaker 1: We are in new territory here, and it's dangerous.
Speaker 8: Extremely dangerous time in our country.
Speaker 4: Which unfortunately in the in the world we're living in and the level of misinformation and confusion out there, some of that can be effective.
Speaker 0: No. The government does not have the technology to engineer a hurricane. The government does not control the weather.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
Why do you think extermination camps had soccer fields, swimming pools, orchestras, daycares, and libraries? 🤔 https://t.co/4iCy1r2MLP
reSee.it AI Summary
According to 'The Science', men can get pregnant and the Earth is a spinning ball in outer space. However, the author questions the adoption of scientific beliefs without considering common sense or logic. They urge readers to imagine how future generations might view our current beliefs and the influence of "The Science". The author also highlights the acceptance of trans kids and the concept of men getting pregnant, and wonders what the future will hold if these ideas continue to gain traction. They draw a parallel to the acceptance of the globe theory 500 years ago, emphasizing the need to question and spread awareness about alternative perspectives. The author shares a video showcasing books and depictions from the past that challenge the heliocentric model, encouraging readers to share and spread the word that 'The Science' is no longer universally accepted.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
‘The Science’ says that men can get pregnant and the earth is a spinning ball in “outer space”… When ‘The Science’ proclaims its religious dogma it is adopted universally, forcefully, and without. *any* regard. for common sense, truth, or logic. …do you still have an imagination? If so, just think ab what kinds of things might be said about you and the things you believe 100 years in the future were we to actually be conquered by these psychopaths and their “Science”… 1/2 the world just accepted that trans kids exist and men can get pregnant *Immediately upon* being introduced to the idea… what will it be like in 100 years if they win? I implore you right now to actually attempt to *imagine* what it will be like… Now go back 500 years and realize that’s exactly. what. happened. with. the. globe. 💯 Our level and motionless plane was declared to be a spinning ball by ‘The Science’ (to the belief of likely very few who actually lived back then) and here we now are 500 years later… take a look around, now trace back to. where. it. *started*… Here’s an HD, full screen, screenshot friendly video of 37 books/pamphlets calling out the heliocentric spinning pear lie from 1865 - 1930 (imagine how much has been lost to time from before that) along with depictions of our realm from every one of our extremely intelligent and impressive ancient ancestors who *all* unanimously knew it was a level and motionless plane bc they. weren’t. fucking. retarded. So, screenshot these, download and read them (they’re all free online), print out copies and spread them around - anything you can do - just spread the word to the normies that the world is no longer sleeping and no longer accepts any of ‘The Science’ regardless of how long ago it was *forcefully adopted*
Video Transcript AI Summary
People need to understand science better. Attacks on experts are attacks on science. Magic is used for education, not black magic. The world is small in the universe. Going against facts makes you look crazy. Going to Bermuda and back isn't all it's cracked up to be. Not everyone can be a robot polisher. Use your head.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But do you have any imagination? People don't know what science is or how and why it works. We own the science, and we think that the world, you know, should know it. The answers we get is because they say so without a lot of Well, they're the experts. It's not it's not just Dave.
These are scientists. These are experts. This is fast moving science. Tax on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. It's a battle of wits.
I hope you don't go in for any of that black magic. No. No. No. No.
No. Never touch the stuff. My my magic is used mainly for educational purposes. World is merely a tiny speck in the universe. If the boy goes about saying the world is round, they'll take him for a lunatic.
He'll be so mixed up, he'll he'll be wearing his shoes on his head. I've seen nothing yet. Watch this. Guys, load me to Bermuda. What where?
Old Vernon, you're back from Bermuda? Yes. Back from Bermuda and the 20th century. And believe me, you can have it. One big modern mess.
And not everybody can be a robot polisher. Use your head. Use your head. Will you
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
“Making fun of a little girl” 😆 https://t.co/sQ1C3f2kNz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features a group of people excitedly building a Lego International Space Station (ISS). They discuss the cool features and express their enthusiasm for space exploration. The conversation then shifts to the topic of COVID-19 and vaccines. They criticize anti-vaxxers and discuss the safety and importance of getting vaccinated. The video ends with a heated argument between two individuals about flat Earth beliefs and personal attacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh,
Speaker 1: yeah. Look at that. So excited. Here it is. The Lego ISS.
I've been waiting ages to do this.
Speaker 2: Thing is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: I've got my coffee in my little mermaid mug. So exciting in that. Look at these. They're so cool. Look at that space guy.
So cool.
Speaker 3: This is the kind of rocket that's gonna take people to the moon. What do you think about that?
Speaker 4: It's going to
Speaker 5: be so cool.
Speaker 1: Normally, I'm quite quick at building LEGO and I'm quite good at finding the pieces quite quickly and I'm quite good at putting it together. Oh, cool. We're building the satellite. Oh, that's so cool. It's
Speaker 0: really cool.
Speaker 1: Starting to look like a space shuttle now.
Speaker 6: What do you think it will be like being on the moon and looking back here at Earth?
Speaker 5: Really cool.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's So cool.
Speaker 3: How cool is it that people
Speaker 6: are gonna be walking on the moon?
Speaker 4: Really, really cool?
Speaker 1: Yes. Look at that. I'm loving it. Absolutely never get bored of this. What goes down there?
Cool.
Speaker 6: What is it? A gyroscope. Didn't you ever see one?
Speaker 1: No. What does it do?
Speaker 4: Watch and you'll find out.
Speaker 6: Oh, yeah. I gotta get it for my my Pokemon studio.
Speaker 4: I got Arcanine right here. You can really sell it.
Speaker 6: I pulled my first Charizard the other day.
Speaker 2: If you are into Pokemon.
Speaker 7: Coronavirus, or to give it its proper name, SARS CoV 2, has wreaked havoc on the entire world. This tiny virus have spread to every portion of our beautiful globe. Shutting down businesses, straining the world's healthcare systems and forcing draconian rules on us Not seen since the 2nd World War in an attempt to stop the spread of this silent killer. It's been a massive burden on the entire planet. But if we listen to the official advice and do as we are told and stay at home, we will all be fine.
And yes, you fucking idiot flat surfers. It is a globe. Talking about flat earthers, it's no wonder they are some of the people that are spreading dangerous and moronic misinformation about the virus.
Speaker 6: And because some flat earthers, especially those in places of influence, choose to peddle fiction, we're losing more of our loved ones today.
Speaker 1: For clarity, a sore arm is classified as an adverse reaction. That's exactly what I had when I had my I've started
Speaker 0: some morons that are called anti vaxxers.
Speaker 7: The most dangerous and dumbest people on the entire planet.
Speaker 0: Worries me How many people might not, get vaccinated?
Speaker 1: 34% of under thirties in this country, in the UK, Believe that the COVID vaccine is harmful. What the
Speaker 6: So, well, go get the vaccine and then you can have that.
Speaker 3: These vaccines were tested just as rigorously as Any other.
Speaker 1: Efficacy of these vaccines has been excellent with up to 90% protection from death and or hospitalization. Produced and approved Just like any other vaccine.
Speaker 4: You're gonna see people eventually that will die off, the the anti vax crowd because, or at least the anti COVID vax crowd, I'm okay with. You know? It doesn't bother me. I'm gonna get the vaccine as soon as it's available.
Speaker 6: So you could you could make some money when they start cruising the seas again after Her research is getting vaccinated.
Speaker 7: You guys are all assholes who don't care about others. Again, fuck you. We're lucky that it wasn't an actual well, Not to downplay it, but it wasn't.
Speaker 3: People getting the vaccine are not being experimented upon.
Speaker 1: With the COVID vaccine, You have almost an unlimited supply of people that are infected with coronavirus. To test this on.
Speaker 3: No one is a guinea pig.
Speaker 6: See, when they get The slaughterhouse. Pete decks to one side, and the silly sheep go in to get their throats cut. What if it made you taste like asparagus pee Smells. That would you still take the vaccination?
Speaker 4: Oh, yeah. I'd get it once a week.
Speaker 8: You know, the origin of COVID 19, that's an IQ test. If you actually fall for the idea that it came out of a a farmer's market just down the road from the level 4 bioweapons lab, you have failed the IQ test.
Speaker 7: You know what else Wuhan has? A bustling wild animal meat market with very few sanitary restrictions and a large population of horseshoe bats.
Speaker 5: You have failed the IQ test.
Speaker 7: And that's what makes anti vaxxers dumber than flat rivers. They've got no reason to think that they're being lied to about vaccines. They're happily take the scientific consensus about the shape of the Earth and space. But still think the government is choosing to poison your children.
Speaker 1: So So
Speaker 0: as I mentioned earlier, anti vaxxers are very stupid. In fact, it takes another level of stupidity to think that it's better for your kid to risk the chance of getting polio than it is for them to get a vaccine because that vaccine
Speaker 7: might cause autumn.
Speaker 0: The highest amount of aluminum Aluminum.
Speaker 1: Aluminum. Aluminum. Has been used safely for over 6 decades in vaccines.
Speaker 3: So negligible. It's tiny.
Speaker 6: Hey. Come on. Let's go watch them start with the sheep.
Speaker 7: Everybody has to do their part to get through this, But it can only happen if we all follow the advice we are given and get used to day
Speaker 3: to day adjustments, Like wearing face masks when going out in public. They work. Wearing them is the absolute least that people can do to uphold minimal civic responsibility. Anything you've heard about masks being ineffective or somehow dangerous is ridiculous. As society begins to get rolling again, having been Senated will be a requirement for doing lots of things.
You can interpret that as manipulative or restrictive if you like, but it's just Common sense.
Speaker 1: There is nothing in a vaccine that can harm us.
Speaker 3: Should be everything you need to know regarding its safety.
Speaker 1: And the reward of the vaccination program Far outweighs the risk. It would not have been approved if it wasn't safe.
Speaker 3: There is not really any strong position against getting this vaccine.
Speaker 1: I don't see why you wouldn't take it that will save lives. Vox, make your kids.
Speaker 6: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 2: But have you seen him play video games?
Speaker 4: Yeah. I'm trash.
Speaker 2: You play video games like a flurf? If I said, you know what? I could do a, A furry video with myself in a sort of a furry suit. It's like a whole music video of furries around the world. Around the globe, I call it.
Sorry, everybody. That was furries around the globe. Brought to you by MC 2, and it's available On my channel right now, I'm sure it's gonna be a number one hit. What'd you think of that?
Speaker 6: That was terrible. Religious cult, and that's what's what Flat Earth has become. It it's it's an extremist religious cult. It is not science. It is not facts.
It is nonsense. Seem to think that there's such a thing as objective morality, but there isn't of morality. Simply, reinforce each other's delusions, and that's really all there is to flat earth anymore. It is objectively false. People people don't want a cesspool in their own room, in in their own house.
They don't want you there. You're moral degenerate. Says the
Speaker 5: man who's dressed like a woman. That's an abomination Yes. Unto the lord, man. That's
Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 5: You you can try the moral downcasting on me.
Speaker 6: I am. I am. Who says who
Speaker 5: says the guy who says that there is no Absolutely. Objective morality. So how do you what by what Standards are you judging me here?
Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. By my community standards. Yeah.
Speaker 5: You're kidding. This the Facebook fact checker community standards.
Speaker 6: I I I'm I'm gonna I'll I'll just put it out there. Yeah. No. Flat Earthers are moral degenerates.
Speaker 5: All of them? That's a blanket statement. Fat slob man dressed as a woman trying to tell us god is lying to us. Yep. And you call me a moral degenerate as you sit here and lie to people about nothing meaning something.
Yes.
Speaker 6: You are.
Speaker 5: You're a joke, and I rebuke your lies. Yeah. That's
Speaker 6: fine. Like like I said, you're more moral degenerates. All everybody. All all flatters believe me. You don't believe me, so you're evil.
I'm gonna I'm just gonna say, you know, You're the moral to donors. You're the ones acting you're the ones whacking in any moral compass. Well, you should be
Speaker 5: I said nothing before you called me a cesspool. I'm just pointing out that you're, like, Fat and unhealthy and dressed like a woman. I mean, you shouldn't be unassessed full.
Speaker 6: We got a we got a glimpse of that, you know, with your anti semitism. I and I bet that that that well goes deep. I bet it does.
Speaker 1: Yep. No
Speaker 5: idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 6: I bet it does. That's why people don't want you, Dustin.
Speaker 7: You repulse them.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
“There is no place on our platform for beliefs or propaganda that encourages violence or hate.” 😆 https://t.co/v5YOt12L73
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
“It’s not just wrong, it’s the inversion of truth. It’s the inversion of reality. Bad is good. Good is bad. War is peace. Truth is a lie.” - @harrisonhsmith https://t.co/JjaRnZ2sVK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the fact-checking done by USA Today regarding the presence of mattresses and booster seats in a New York tunnel. They criticize the media for manipulating the truth and spreading lies. The speaker explains that propaganda aims to humiliate and control people by presenting outrageous and blatantly false information. They emphasize the scale of deception and the interconnectedness of various actors involved. The speaker believes that recognizing the truth and resisting manipulation is easy for those who are intellectually strong. They argue that the control of communication is crucial for those in power and that free speech poses a threat to their agenda. The speaker urges people to wake up and reject the deception imposed by the system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was a fact check from USA Today that says only dirt and tools found in New York Tunnel, not mattresses or booster seats. Fact check. Now we showed you the videos of the booster seat. We showed you the videos of the mattresses. So why are they telling you that they don't exist when you saw them on video?
Now we've said a million times, the purpose of the mainstream media is to tell the Truth believe you believing a lie. That's what they're doing in this case. What they're saying is, well, that mattress wasn't in the tunnel. It was in the wall. So to say that there was a soiled, possibly bloody child sized mattress in the tunnel is not true.
It was in the wall outside of the tunnel. Oh, okay. Thanks for clearing that up, you propagandist psychopaths. Well, that child's booster seat Wasn't in the tunnel. It was in the basement corridor leading to the tunnel.
Oh, okay. Thanks for clearing that up. You deceivers, you manipulators, you liars.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 0: The purpose of propaganda, at least in its late stage form, is not to inform you or deceive you or even manipulate you. It is to humiliate you. Its purpose is to be so outlandish, so ridiculous, and so blatantly untrue, and yet so totally undeniable In order to reinforce the power of the state, Soviets referred to this as hyperrealism. That is the state of everyone saying things that are completely false And that they know to be false, but which they cannot deny. The supermarket shelves are empty and breadline stretch around the corner, but the newspapers report that the year's agricultural quotas have been exceeded once again.
And everyone is forced to repeat this lie, and thus they become complicit in it. It is a system of total societal humiliation and control. Whether it's a tactic or not, the overwhelming nature of the deception is such that the scale itself makes it hard to deny. It's like people regular people can't understand, the scale of Deception that we're dealing with. And that everything is fake.
Everything
Speaker 1: is fake.
Speaker 0: Handle all of this, I guess takes a lot of intellectual fortitude or something. When you understand the scale of deception, when you understand Just how monumental this operation is and how it's all intertwined and how it's all the same actors manipulating all of these things. It's very easy to resist. It's very easy to stand up against it. It's like we're out here trying to campaign to tell people the sky is blue when it's manifestly true with their own eyes.
Everybody can see the reality of the situation. They're either willfully ignorant, willfully blind to this, they're in on it, Or they're just so weak that they they they can't handle the the moderate discomfort of the truth. I covered on the show before where it was a poll where it was like, is Nick Fuentes right? And Israel and the Jews are destroying America. Is somebody else right?
China is destroying America, or as Alex Jones right in the World Economic Forum is destroying America. And it's like, do you not understand how all of these things work together? They don't care coal power plants. They don't care about pollution. They don't care about climate change.
What they care about is control, a scheme of of control in totality. Like, there's nothing that they don't wanna control. And, of course, they do it in the most inverted in underhanded and subversive way possible. It's the money. It's the language.
It's the education. It's the media. It's everything. Everything. Everything.
Everything. They want everything under their control, and they don't want you realizing it. Their system requires, Total control of communication. It desires total control of everything, but the the spoke in their wheel is people being able to speak freely about what's going on, people able to discuss and contradict what The elite are dictating for the rest of us. So this is I mean, free speech is an existential threat to our enemies in the info war.
Remember, everything these people say is a lie. Everything they claim to believe is just utter crap. Like, I don't know how to emphasize that anymore. There there's a meme that's been going around recently, and it simply says the purpose of a system is what it does. Purpose of a system is what it does.
You can say the purpose is whatever you want. The outcome of the system is the purpose of the system. And so all of these systems, You have to separate the language, the the rhetoric about it from the actual outcome. The purpose of the system is what it does. There is, after all, no point in claiming that the purpose of the Some is to do what it constantly fails to do.
So you said by Stafford Beer. And I don't know. I don't know. I don't even know. Because I it's it's so obvious.
It's like, on one hand, I can't believe people can't see this. I don't believe people can't see this. I I unless people are really just willfully Ignorant to everything that's going on, I have to think there's some glimmer of consciousness in the American people. So again, on the face of it, just on the face of it, These things are ridiculous. These things are absurd.
These things are lies. They're just lies. So you could you can just see through them if you want. It's not that hard. If people don't realize the importance of this reality and then work to Combat it.
Regardless of the names that they call you or the the rhetoric itself that they deploy to prevent you from standing up against them. If you can't overcome that and actually stand up against the And deliberate outcome of these programs, then we're lost. We're just lost completely. Again, it's not just wrong. It's the inversion of truth.
It's the inversion of reality. Bad is good. Good is bad. War is peace. Truth is a lie.
I mean, It's time to wake up. It's time to wake up, folks. Now or never. We gotta wake up to these deceptions because they're so blatant. They're so obvious.
Speaker 1: At the
Speaker 0: end of the day, it means we are to blame because they're announcing what they're doing. They're telling you what they're gonna do. If you don't stop them, it's kinda your fault. It's kind of all of our faults.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot
Speaker 0: Again, it's hard to overstate how difficult it will Be to reject this with anything less than the majority of people just waking up and rejecting it. Like, you have to wake up. You have to reject it, And it has to be a mass movement. And, of course, it's so obvious that they can only maintain the illusion by absolute in total control of communication, which is why they're so desperate to censor everybody all the time because You can't have people noticing things and then explaining these things to other people who haven't noticed yet. That's the destruction of the system.
And this is an example of the level of gaslighting that's happening in the, media right now.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
Another great Harrison/Owen compilation updated with subtitles https://t.co/GQKPPLVoic
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express their frustration with what they perceive as lies and manipulation from those in power. They criticize the division in society and argue that people should think for themselves instead of being controlled by others. They accuse the left of being part of a ruthless mob that destroys lives and serves the interests of the wealthy elite. The speakers also claim that censorship is being used to hide vaccine side effects. They urge people to wake up and reject the illusionary crusade created by those in power. They emphasize the importance of freedom and unity among ordinary Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They lie. We know they lie. They know we know they lie, and they lie anyway. That's how you treat a slave.
Speaker 1: I guess it's up to the American people to determine whether we believe what they say Or what they do.
Speaker 0: They know they're lying to you. They use it to put you in fear.
Speaker 1: They say that they're not muzzling you as they strap the muzzle on your face. If you're being told I'm not muzzling you, but you can feel a muzzle being put around your mouth, I wonder which you believe. I'm not I'm not muzzled. He said I'm not muzzled. It's like, I'm sorry.
I can't hear you through your muzzle, sir.
Speaker 0: Not everybody can be a robot polisher. It's the people that weren't deceived by big pharma. It's the people that weren't deceived that are pissed off, and then it's the people that fell for the vaccine propaganda That took the vaccine, that are still trying to cover it up, calling you the conspiracy theorist even though you continue to be proven right. What psychological phenomenon is that? Stockholm syndrome.
Look at how divided we are. This isn't even political. It shouldn't be political. The left used to be against big pharma. What happened?
Speaker 1: You're an orc. You are a robot. You are an unthinking automaton who is doing the bidding of people who despise you.
Speaker 0: We can't even come together when we're being blatantly assaulted by the ruling class.
Speaker 1: The left is this monolithic ruthless mob that will destroy you heartlessly, that will mercilessly Eviscerate you and destroy your entire livelihood and your business, and they'll get you fired, and they'll, get you banned off the Internet. They do it thinking that they're good despite the whole time that they're serving the interest of the billionaire class that they supposedly hate. Stop being part of the mob. Just stop being willfully mind controlled by people who despise you. It's so simple.
Just say no. Just think for yourself. It literally is that simple.
Speaker 0: They are just destroying us, And we can't even come together when all the facts are right there. It is hate that is dividing us, and it's not hate coming from us. It's their hatred.
Speaker 1: Does not happen on the right. I'm so sick of this. It's like, wow. Hey. But both sides engage.
No. We don't. We don't do this. People on the right do not wake up every day looking for some leftist who stepped out of line or some right winger who stepped out of line In order to destroy their lives. Don't do that.
What is this? Don't know what that's like to be in that mindset. I don't know what it's like to be a cult member. I don't know what it's like To be so weaponized against my fellow Americans without even knowing why I'm doing it. Wake up.
You just do it. You just get the feedback. You get the You get the the dopamine rush, a feeling like, you know, other people are celebrating what you're doing, and you're just burning Right? You're just setting fire to the village and but but, hey, your fellow soldiers are clapping you on the back. You're like, I must be engaged in a war here.
No. You're engaged In a massacre, you are psychopaths that are on a warpath against people that are not fighting you and are not trying to destroy you. We're just trying to live our lives. We're just trying to go about our business. We're just desperate to have some semblance of say in the in the course of this country, and against us Is this massive mob who knowingly or unknowingly, willingly, or by some unknown compulsion is engaged in this massacre, this genocide, this holocaust against normal people that are just trying to live our lives.
Speaker 0: You're censoring news about vaccine side effects that people are getting to this day. They're still getting them multiple doses, multiple rounds, children getting them, and and you're covering up And lying to them about this vaccine all to protect your own what? Your own politics? Your own grievances with the right? Your own grievances with Trump?
Your own hatred Good for your fellow man.
Speaker 1: They convince themselves of this illusion, and then they fight it. And the problem is that the illusion is is on top of us, so they're fighting us. They're fighting the people. They're just trying to live their lives. They're just trying just want things to be normal.
It's all we want. It's all we have. We don't wake up in the morning and go whose life will we destroy now? We don't revel in the power that we have to Destroy somebody's career over a tweet. Like, that's you people.
You people are psychopaths, and you project your psychopathy onto us to say, well, both side. Well, we're both do we're both engaged in this. No. No. We're not engaged in your illusionary crusade.
We're trying to confront the real world that we can't do, but the problems that are real can't be solved because you people are constantly causing more problems.
Speaker 0: They have the people in fear. They have the people hating their Fellow man, their fellow countryman, their fellow neighbor.
Speaker 1: Who do they think we are? They create a Straw man, they create a a fantasy boogeyman, and then they fight it. And they they weaponize their own, you know, authority to combat this thing that doesn't exist. What does exist, it's a bunch of normal people. They're your neighbors.
They're your bus divers. They're the people that work the deli and the grocery store. They're your normal regular Americans who actually have a lot of them, like Thus, deep seated fear about the dystopian, hellish, drone surveillance, permission to go outside of your neighborhood world that's being about by the leftist, by the liberals.
Speaker 0: It's like it's like being in shackles with your fellow slave, and you're like, we wanna be free. And then the guy to your right says, I like my shackles. You shut up about taking these shackles off. I like my shackles. These shackles are loving.
Speaker 1: So, again, we're just we're dealing with, In a very real way, this wild eyed fantasy of these conspiracy theorists who have utterly baseless fears that they then force out and propagate throughout the country so that people think they're justified in the actually dystopian measures that they're taking. It's completely insane. Again, who do they think they're fighting against? They are convinced they're fighting against Nazis, fascists, people that would Imprison them for the way they think. They're not.
They're fighting against regular Americans. Normal people that just wanna be left alone, that just want things to be like they were when They grew up where people were friendly and you can trust the the government, so they thought, you know, just not to live in a chaotic, hateful, Tyrannical world that you people are building. It really is a mob mentality. It really is just like Just like orcs, they they don't know why they're fighting. They don't know who they're serving.
They just know it feels good to go out and destroy the enemy. And these people Come to the rescue of these massive corporations. They do the bidding of their corporate overlords without even realizing it, without knowing why. You don't have to do that. You can wake up.
You can join us. You can recognize that we're right.
Speaker 0: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 1: Think they're on a holy crusade against Mordor's army That doesn't exist. It is completely fabricated. You're the Nazi. You're the you're the psychopath. You are the tyrant.
That's just you, Kia. Just wake up. Free yourself from your mind control masters, and join us in the light.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
Literally anybody can pick a date in the future and see the ISS with their *very own eyes* - clearly definitive evidence we’re standing on a spinning ball. Imagine believing a balloon could fly 17,500MPH! 🤣🤣🤣 Do they even think?! Only spaceships go that fast, obviously 🙄 https://t.co/sP9edaUcso
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the International Space Station (ISS) and its orbit. They question how the ISS can maintain its speed of 4.7 miles per second without ripping apart. They also mention the lack of documentation and footage of the construction of the ISS. The speakers debate the predictability of the ISS's movement and its relationship to its size and distance. They suggest that electromagnetic tethering and the use of static electricity could explain the ISS's ability to stay afloat. The speakers also mention spiders' ability to use static electricity for travel. They speculate on the nature of satellites and the possibility of manipulating electrostatic mechanics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does a space ranger actually do?
Speaker 1: You guys are talking about how the ISS is floating up there. It's orbiting, and orbiting is to is is is falling.
Speaker 0: That was falling with style. Can you explain to me how they were able to get the International Space Station to go 4.7 miles per second? And if it is within Earth's atmosphere, how it's not ripping itself apart?
Speaker 2: It's observably true that it shows up every 90 minutes. Please tell me, Flurf. How can a balloon traveling in the atmosphere travel at Thousands of miles are out.
Speaker 0: If what I'm seeing is actually not real,
Speaker 3: then what am I looking at?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Why would you question them constructing that in free fall orbit? That's not that big of a stretch. Right? Never been tested.
The transfer of the reference Frame has never been substantiated. We don't even know how that works. I like to think about Hubble because it's like a 20 what is it? A 20 ton, telescope. And they bring that up there and then they construct it in free fall orbit, but they don't document any of it.
There's no footage of them doing it. It's not like it's expensive project, you know, with With a lot of, vested interest for the entire country and the government, NASA, and military. Like, it's not like it's got any of those implications. So you wouldn't want strict strict chain of custody and strict documentation. You wouldn't want to have public records.
You wouldn't wanna maybe just take 1 1 video during the construction, maybe a couple pictures here and there. You know, you wouldn't want you wouldn't want anything like that. Stop asking questions. It's not about you guys. It's not about proving anything to you guys.
It's about brushing our teeth in a in a gravity less area where our hair looks so insanely silly. What matters? What the important part about The important reason that we need to get up there and go into the ISS and spend all this time there is so we can do some theatrics for you. That's the important thing.
Speaker 5: And you can see how fast it goes across because you have a moon video on its, on its page of the ISS crossing the moon in real time, and it's instant. Literally a blink of an eye. Like, it just looks like a piece of dust flying across the screen, but when you slow it down, it's the International Space Station.
Speaker 0: So clearly, something is there. Clearly, it's 400 kilometers in altitude, and clearly, it's traveling 4.7 miles per second.
Speaker 3: It could be traveling that fast. It could also not be. If you're basing all your how fast it's moving off of what they've given you, then, yeah, obviously, it's gonna go back to the dimensions that they give you a globe. Like, yeah, it'll reverse engineer back into that through scale and variance. So how fast something is moving across the sky doesn't tell you anything about how far away it is from you or anything like that.
You have to make assumptions or have to know certain things about, you know, you're I'm using air quotes. You have to know certain about what's moving in the sky to try and draw a relationship between how fast it's moving to the sky relative to you and its actual size. Right? But if you're just going off angular size,
Speaker 4: you would have to take the you would have
Speaker 3: to take their word for it. Right? It is orbital mechanics of the ISS over you know, going around the globe doing its thing and then one over an AE projection. Right? Now when you look at the spiral, you'll see that it, you know, makes a flower of life pattern similar to what you would look at when you look at a magnet under a Ferro cell.
What I think is What I think they probably have done and tether something to to that, to those field lines, and travels along those. I'm not I I know that, that people have seen the ISS. I know you can go to ISS tracker and, Pick a pick a random date in the future, pick a time, and you look up in the sky and it'll it'll it'll generally be there. Jaren's done it a couple of time. Because, like, you know, a lot of people like like, the ISS isn't real or, like, no one's seen it or that kind of stuff.
It's like, well, some people have seen it, like, you know, it does have some sort of predictability to it. Like, the the argue on that, and they and they go to issstractor.com and they try it out for themselves and then they then they see it. Like, they're never gonna believe anything you say Right. So, like, you have to kinda be careful on that. They say they're doing experiments up there.
There's no published papers from them. They just make, like, news press announcements that say they the thing. It's not like I'm just like, we don't really know what's going on or if there's a or if there's even you know you know what I mean? There's a lot of ambiguity there.
Speaker 4: It has a pattern like Alan pointed out and that that pattern actually matches a what what we would call on a flat earth model like a, like a toroidal flow, shape. And I think, personally and I think that some of these satellites, the shapes that they that they would show are, yeah, part of, like, that, a sacred geometry shape that we see. There's actually a flow of of of the stuff that we exist in, and that flow gets greater at higher altitudes. And so if that's the case and if there's less density at higher altitudes, then there's gonna be a greater ether flow. And all you really need to do is come up with a way to keep your craft afloat.
And once your craft is afloat, you can catch the ether winds and just go in in a, like, a spiro graphic type of shape around the world.
Speaker 3: It's like where it is that predictable and Precise. That's where that's where I'm, like, really intrigued with it too because, like, it is that because, like, I'll I'll link You like, I see where you're having a little hang up on the, scale and variance thing. Because once you realize that, it'll blow your mind. Kinda get like, oh, yeah. Makes sense what he's saying.
But, like, in terms of, like, the predictability of it, if it's just over a flat like like, again, if you pull up the ISS orbital pattern over, an AE map, You'll see, like, what it looks like, and then just look at that next to a, a magnetic carousel, like an image of that. You'll see, like, the fractal pattern looks the same. So if you could have technology to tether to something like that. Like, it would you could definitely get in a quote unquote orbit over a plane, you know, that would match Have predictability to it. Practical technology that's applicable.
Like, they've, you know, like, the idea that the the yeah. The idea that something's in, like, Perpetual free fall, but not accelerating, you know, and all this stuff. It's like you know, that requires, like, a whole different level of Glee system, whereas, like, electromagnetic tethering is yeah. You can look up electromagnetic gathering. It's real stuff.
Speaker 6: I'll take this balloon, dump it against my head to generate some static electricity,
Speaker 5: And this small piece of plastic to represent an organism and do the same
Speaker 6: Make that organism fly. Using static electricity.
Speaker 3: That's real practical, applicable, applicable technology and something that's in nature. Spiders utilize it.
Speaker 6: These smart spiders are actually tapping into the Earth's electric fields. There are different levels of electricity in the air. Called ballooning, their spider senses detect the electrical fields. As their silk is negatively charged, it repels negative charges in the air, generating a force Strong enough to launch them skywards. An almost effortless way to travel.
Speaker 5: In fact, their silk super Highway
Speaker 6: is so successful, some tiny travelers have been found an astonishing 1,000 miles out at c and up to two and a half miles high in the air.
Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a huge charge potential in the sky for the gradient of electricity in a uniform linear gradient. Right? Yeah. So we exist within that charge potential and, like, you know, it's like I said, spiders utilize that.
That gradient, you know, provides that static electric, mechanism that you were something was talking about earlier. Yeah. So, like, people think that, like, these fly when they flap their wings. They actually resonant frequency that resist, that resist the wind and ship. So, like, they can they can fly in 20 or 30 per mile hour crosswinds just off of their, Static electric frequency that they generate.
So it's like, you know it's like it's like, are you levitating, or are you flying? Like, who knows? Right?
Speaker 6: Miles per hour. What?
Speaker 3: 30 miles per hour crosswinds, bro, while carrying mad pollen. Like, because you they're not you know, they say, like, they're not aerodynamic and all that kind of stuff. And, like, on top of that, they're carrying it all together, just flapping their little wings. You know?
Speaker 7: When he beats his wings, he starts to resonate this energy, and it goes back and forth just Similar to a guitar strumming on one side of the room and hitting the same chord on the other side of the room or, Somebody hitting a high sea and breaking a crystal. It's the same thing. It's resonance. They resonate. And when they resonate, They eventually reach the resonance of the field around them.
The earth is operating on a frequency of 8.5 hertz per second or so forth. Once this bumblebee hits that resonant frequency of its surroundings, it becomes a free agent. It creates a magnetic bubble around itself, and it can go anywhere it wants.
Speaker 3: Yeah. When you get into the electrostatic mechanics of it and, like, you start to see, like Like, resident frequencies defy so called gravity on, like, a scale that's manipulatable that you can actually interact with, Whereas, like, you can't bend space time. You can't do anything like that, you know, on the on this on any sort of scale. So it's like on the greater scale of, like, what's at the what's at the top of that charge potential where it's highest, like, could you tether some technology to it that, you know, that rides that? Like, who knows, bro?
It it gets really up in the air for speculation. Do they have the technology to, like, you know, to to quote unquote, fake it till you make it, 100%, bro. So, you know, I would, That's that's my take on, like, on, like, what the satellites are and all that. And not everybody can be a robot polisher. They say, like, based on, how the altitude of its orbit, right, and how we can see it through reflections of the sun, basically, right, lighting up the solar panels on the underbelly.
But it maintains a uniform, like, it's not, it's not like a line of sight projection. It has its own light, obviously. Like, which doesn't make any is sense. Like, it it it gets crazy, dude.
@RobotPolisher - ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一
The Anti-Vaxxers Are Winning 🥳 https://t.co/u1F7cxXS7j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scott Adams, a prominent figure, has gained attention for his views on vaccines. He suggests that anti-vaxxers have come out on top due to their distrust of big companies and government. However, others argue that this is not a win, but rather a loss for humanity. They emphasize that everyone is a victim in this situation, and instead of dividing into winners and losers, they encourage unity against the manipulators and those who forced vaccinations. The hope is for people to awaken to the truth and work together moving forward. The question remains whether Scott Adams will change his approach in the future or continue to rely on expert opinions selectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this from Scott Adams went viral over the weekend.
Speaker 1: The anti vaxxers win, Dobbert trader Scott Adams admit vaccine skeptics were right not to trust the COVID jab. Let's watch Scott Adams finally come around.
Speaker 2: The anti vaxx people appear to be the winners. They came out the best. They they have the winning position.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We know. We know. Like, thank you, I guess. Like, but yeah.
Yeah. We know. We know we won. The problem with this is that we're not 2 armies fighting each other. Against nobody has won this You
Speaker 0: think that feels like a win, or do you think that feels like I just got kicked in the stomach? It's not a win.
Speaker 3: They They
Speaker 2: feel better. The the thing they're not worrying about is what I have to worry about, which is I wonder if that vaccination 5 years from now.
Speaker 3: I don't wanna be here 20 you know, 8 years ago telling you this was all coming, and now we're living it. I don't wanna be here 5 years from now and you're saying, oh my god. It's true. 1,000,000,000 are dead. I wanna stop this.
Okay?
Speaker 2: Because, really, the anti vaxxers, I think, were really just distrustful of big companies and big government. That's never wrong. So if you just took the position, let's just distrust everything the government did. Well, you won. You won.
You won completely.
Speaker 1: It it was not a baseless, pointless, petulant rejection of everything the government says. It was elegant, thoughtful, considerate rejection of everything that the government said. If the government wasn't lying, then we wouldn't distrust him. If the government wasn't spreading obvious falsehoods, then we would have gone along with what the government was doing. It's not just A, again, petulant, mindless, just absolute rejection of everything the government and companies say, it is a A discriminatory acceptance of what you know to be true and a rejection of what you know to be false.
Speaker 0: We know the planet we live Come on. We know the people pushing the vaccines are psychotic. So, no, this wasn't a
Speaker 4: we got lucky or we didn't trust the system. We knew
Speaker 0: the people pushing the vaccines wanna depopulate us.
Speaker 3: They knew it cut the life expectancy of rodents in
Speaker 2: I did not end up in the right place. The right place would be natural immunity, no no vaccination. You should take victory, and I should take defeat.
Speaker 0: No. That's that's me as human taking a loss. That's me as a human standing for humanity getting murdered. That's not a win.
Speaker 2: Do you win? You win. You are the winners. You are are the winners. Right?
Let me say that part with no ambiguity. You won. You won.
Speaker 1: We're all victims in this. Some of us are victims of attempted murder and other others of us are victims of actual murder, but nobody won here. We're all on the same side here. We're all victims of this, whether we're the victims of the brainwashing and the, you know, being ostracized from our family and, you know, criticized and Attempted to be humiliated on social media and others, like, we're victims of that. You're victims of, trusting people that despise you and letting them inject poison into your veins.
So we're all victims here. So instead of saying, you know, I surrender. You win, I lose. How about you're on our team now, and now you're on the winning side?
Speaker 2: All of your heuristics don't trust these guys. It's Obvious. Totally worked.
Speaker 1: He also has accepted this idea that the anti vaxx people are somehow, like, happy that the pro vaxx People are dying. Do we want them to suffer from their choice? We don't. We we wanted you to avoid this the whole time. We want you on our side, not because we wanna defeat the other side didn't kill all the people that wanted the vax, but because we want everybody to be awake and realize that we're all on the same side against the liars and the manipulators in the genocidal psychopaths that forced this on all of us.
So welcome to our side. Get your head right, and we can move forward together.
Speaker 3: This isn't about being right about saving lives. And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 1: Question is, will he reform his tactics moving forward. Will he actually take this into account next with the next one? Or is he gonna be out there going, well, climate change? I mean, it's actually really but all the experts agree though.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Nobody has ever or *will ever* land on the moon https://t.co/48WrZBrvGL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people believe that the moon landing was a hoax, but the speakers in the video provide evidence to prove otherwise. They explain how a laser can be used to detect manmade equipment on the moon and show footage of the laser beam being reflected back. They also address skeptics who question the authenticity of the lunar module and the footage of the redocking. Despite the conspiracy theories, the speakers emphasize the importance of space exploration and the desire to go beyond low earth orbit. The video ends with a powerful image of Earth from the moon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It seems that there are some people that do not believe that man has actually been to the moon. I've met some of them. What do you think? I think they're crazy. What's up, Neil?
We really went to the moon.
Speaker 1: There's no conspiracy here.
Speaker 0: We've been there. We've done them.
Speaker 1: So get over it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Thanks, conspiracy theorist. Preparing to fire laser at the moon. Initiating laser on a retroreflector from Apollo 15. In 1969, the astronauts on Apollo 11 positioned reflectors on the surface of the moon.
If we knew its exact location and
Speaker 2: we had a powerful For
Speaker 0: the laser, we could detect the reflection and prove there is manmade equipment on the moon. When you think about it, this is Extraordinary. A laser is shot from Earth and nixed a round trip of over half a 1000000 miles.
Speaker 1: If we get a signal back, that means that we were in fact There.
Speaker 0: Precisely the ultimate proof of man's moon mission. Oh, that's very cool. Now we'll be able to see the beam when it leaves, but it be strong enough when it comes back to be seen by the naked eye. In fact, it's something that can only be picked up by the most sensitive of collectors, and hopefully, when we get that Photon back. We'll see a spike like that.
The spike? There it is. There's the spike. That's the return from Apollo 15. It's the moon.
We hit the moon. That is So cool. That's your big experiment? I went out for a lion on the stream.
Speaker 3: Dude, people are fuck Now, like, the world's filled with literal idiots. Do you think a laser can shoot 240 1000 miles.
Speaker 1: A 1000000000 times more powerful than this is. That's what you gotta have to make it to the moon and back.
Speaker 3: You're telling me you're on a ball going 1,000 miles an hour and hit a little mirror, and it can bounce back and hit your little box, and you go, wow. We went to The moon. You you literally believe that. How do you believe that? Try and bounce a laser a 1000 yards And hit where you started.
1,000 yards.
Speaker 0: Alright. Can you ping the ping the reflector? There it is. That's what? Like, 500 meters away, would you say?
350. Okay. Fact that we can do this is The only way of definitively proving that there are man made objects on the moon. Ultimate proof of man's moon mission.
Speaker 1: Hey, Hoagz.
Speaker 0: Hoax. Really thrilling to what's happening in right in front of us. Not just thrilling, but conclusive. There's this fight.
Speaker 3: Take a minute and just think about how, a laser going a round trip of 500 1000 miles on a ball spinning 1,000 miles an hour to reflect back to boxed, and then they say that's proof that someone fucking played golf on the moon. It's fiction. It's lies. It's bullshit. No one went to the moon.
You can't there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone's ever been to the moon. There's actually no evidence that you can go To the moon. And this is the shit that distorts young minds. Those of you that have been Vaccine damage. I'm being very playful.
Speaker 1: We'll prove that man actually was on
Speaker 0: We're testing out on space station, are definitely helping us with our goals of going beyond lower us through the waves of radiation. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space. Early in the next decade, A set of crewed flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low earth orbit. We wanna get NASA out of low earth orbit and go Explore the heavens.
Speaker 4: Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That's the farthest that we can go. The moon, Mars, asteroids, there's a lot of destinations that we could go to, And we're building these building block components in order to allow
Speaker 0: us to
Speaker 4: do that eventually eventually.
Speaker 0: This is Houston
Speaker 5: now. Hello, Neil and Buzz. I'm talking to you by telephone from the oval room at the White House, And this certainly has to be the most historic telephone call ever made.
Speaker 2: Do the research. You actually look into it like your buddy Joe Rogan did for a long time.
Speaker 0: Ridiculous. It looks Stupid. Looks ridiculous and dummy. There's no way people went on the moon. There's no way.
Speaker 2: It's just lava borne. It's held together by literal tape. Look at that.
Speaker 0: That is Tape, Tim. That's space tape, bud. Simple scotch tape haphazardly placed here and there as if it were a last minute Job.
Speaker 2: Other than the foil, what is that? What is that A Twinkie?
Speaker 6: No. I'm sure it's some super important and necessary high-tech device. Look at The buckling, warping, and indentation.
Speaker 0: There is no explanation for the sloppiness in the construction of the lunar module With the engines covered with aluminum foil, the external panels not even lining up with each other, and the scotch tape that seems added at the last moment just to keep together pieces that would otherwise fall apart.
Speaker 1: And you can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly.
Speaker 6: Here, we see the lunar lander redocking with the command module. This is clearly fake and made with props, Models and footage similar to the Hollywood creations of the day such as Stanley Kubrick's 2000 and one space odyssey created in 1968, The year before the 1st supposed moon landing. Look at the jerky, unrealistic motions and lack of thrusters being used. The craft is just being turned like a Rubik's cube somehow. All of this supposedly happening as they both orbit the moon at 4,000 miles per hour.
This is actual
Speaker 0: official NASA footage of the Apollo 11 redocking. You you know there's gotta be people that are like, dude, come on. You can't Candy, tinfoil, and card. No one's gonna believe that. Dude, there's people that trust me.
Their mind when they saw them. They saw the lamp. When they looked at it, they're like, what? Yeah. What?
I go, yes. Yeah. You wake up, believe whatever we show them. They liked it. They go, let's make it fucking ridiculous.
Let's make it fucking ridiculous, because it's almost humiliating. You know? Let's make it let's just show let's just, like let's let's just convince these dummies of something so stupid, you No. I'm just, Yeah. It's just dumb.
Or, yeah, just humiliate us. Well, if I go out back and look up in the sky and see the moon, I, I Like, either I can remember where I was 20 years ago or I can pretend I've never been there, and it works for me either way. Imparsion.
Speaker 4: K. It's a telemetry data is even in existence. And as I said, even if we had it, we don't have any change to play it back.
Speaker 0: But your your your own research has shown that My data is missing.
Speaker 4: That's that's right.
Speaker 0: Right. We we've been unable to to to track it down. I mean, we don't know, where this This telemetry data ended up, and we don't know the what what path it may have taken. So, unfortunately, I'm afraid I can't really give you much of a clue as to as to where this data ended up and whether it it still exists or not. Are we truly to believe that NASA has spent all this money To send a vehicle covered with loose pieces of cardboard into space.
Who did you talk to? I do have access to something that no one else has Camera, please. Turn the camera off. You're talking to the wrong guy. Why don't you talk to the administrator in NASA?
We're passengers. We're we're guys going on a flight. We're not no. No. This camera working the wrong way.
You don't mislead somebody like I've met her. And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this, The deal's not as though? Get the fuck out. You want me to knock you in the head? I'm gonna give you the opportunity to get the hell knocked out of it if you don't leave me alone.
Speaker 4: I don't give a damn about all that shit.
Speaker 0: I have no idea what you're talking about. I think you must be some kind of wacko. Oh. Yeah. Alright.
Can you quote me and say it's bullshit? You won for your lawyer to sue me. That's right. I hope you do. See.
I'd love to go to court and show a window You're a coward and a liar and a thief. Put your hand on the bible. Swear to god you walked on the moon. Mister Severeux, knowing you, that's probably a Well, you have $5,000 cash. You can give it to charity.
You can swear on the bible that you walked on the moon. Mister Seibel, you do not Deserved answers. Okay. Turn off the camera. Your interview is done.
Please get your ass out of my house. Okay. As an independent producer. We're heading out. I don't get people, but you're gonna be on the deck unless you
Speaker 2: I'm dead now. I'm dead.
Speaker 0: Get the hell out of them.
Speaker 4: Black house.
Speaker 0: Don't get get it done. Shoot them at them before they get out of the office. The CIA. Have them waxed. I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond.
The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we, destroyed that technology, And, it's a painful process to build it back again. Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 7: Really happy to see, what What we see from the moon and, of course, looking back on the Earth.
Speaker 0: That's us. That's home. 232,000 miles away from Earth.
Speaker 3: There's this fight
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the censorship of Alex Jones and the demonization of conspiracy theorists. It questions why questioning the shape of the Earth is deemed harmful and highlights the creation of the term "conspiracy theorist" by the CIA. The speakers mention the banning of flat Earth content on YouTube and the introduction of factual information boxes by Google. They express disbelief and curiosity about the reasons behind the censorship. Overall, the video explores the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the perceived fakeness of space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Alex Jones is just a crackpot, why are the most powerful people in the
Speaker 1: country trying to silence him? No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers. Maybe Alex Jones is onto something. Read this book and decide for yourself who's crazy.
Speaker 2: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 3: In the age social media censorship questioning whether or not the earth is a globe has been deemed harmful thought. But why is this?
Speaker 4: The term conspiracy theorist was created after the JFK assassination to demonize people looking into the official story. That's a fact. That's where it came really Yo. Yeah. For the CIA, they created that term.
Speaker 5: Oh, the story that's so classified.
Speaker 4: The idea
Speaker 5: documents we can't see. We can't worry. We're never gonna see. Years later. Okay.
Speaker 4: Okay. We're never gonna see. So that term been demonized. And the people on the left, they call, oh, it's a conspiracy. I mean, I grew
Speaker 5: up in a world where I actually believe that See, theories were the way that dumb, uninformed people explain the complex world. That was a mark of a low IQ. Now the more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're It's
Speaker 6: funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a compelling Earth. Space is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. I mean, it's
Speaker 6: just it's Islamophobia born a 1000% right.
Speaker 1: No one bothers to censor the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: Well, flat earthers get banned on YouTube. No one
Speaker 1: bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 7: So we're introducing boxes that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual such as searching for the earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of
Speaker 4: Your response is to put a box saying, nope. The earth is not Flat.
Speaker 7: Correct.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 5: All of that, it was hours of content. It's all banned now. Crazy is that. I know. Right?
Speaker 0: Okay. Why are they banning it? If it Are they hiding? Why why would they do that? Yeah.
Why, Alex? Right there. Why would they do that?
Speaker 1: Because Google cares about us.
Speaker 5: Alex. Exactly.
Speaker 1: No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: The more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're
Speaker 8: It's funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a
Speaker 5: Know the Earth.
Speaker 2: Not body can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 6: Face is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. It's just
Speaker 8: It's Islamophobia. I'm a 1000% right.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Tucker on #FlatEarth https://t.co/wo6zIPa8nw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker is asked about his thoughts on the flat earth theory. He responds by saying he is open to anything due to the amount of deception in the world. He mentions that the story of history being a linear progression towards enlightenment is a complete lie, as there is overwhelming evidence against it. He also mentions that the physical earth has been greatly impacted by climate change over millions of years. With all this in mind, Tucker admits he doesn't know what is true anymore.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tucker, one thing we don't have the clip. You said and this is another thing. Jimmy went to Princeton. He's so smart. But I talked to this guy, Eddie who's good friends with Joe Rogan, and they they give me these ideas, and they say that there's this thing called the ice wall and that the earth might be flat.
What do you think about flat earth theory, Tucker.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm open to anything, but I
Speaker 0: Hey. That's it. Kick cut the towel. Wow.
Speaker 1: Brock. How could I not be open to anything at this point? I mean, there's been so much deception that you can't trust your preconceptions. So I'll tell you this, The story that we were told growing up in school about the progression of history, how it's sort of an unending, Do you know, like ascent toward enlightenment and technological progress is linear. It moves in one direction, except for the dark ages.
That's a complete lie. That's a complete lie. I mean, there's, like, overwhelming evidence that's not true. So once you understand that the this the most basic stories we've been told About history, about the earth, the physical earth itself, which has been completely changed by climate change, for 1000000 of years. Bra.
Once you realize all of that, then it's like, I don't know what is true.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Angry and stupid is no way to go through life kids… https://t.co/G65V4pD781
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
The men behind the curtain ***need*** absolutely fucking ***require*** you to keep believing in “space” - they’ll even give you back Trump - *anything* as long as you keep playing “space” with them. It’s ***everything*** to them The whole. system. crumbles. without. “Space.” https://t.co/cBZ8i86B9T
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to Story Time from Space, a magical place that not everyone can experience. The importance of space and the next generation of space travel is emphasized, with the belief that it is vital for our future. Rejections and challenges are overcome, leading to the realization that what was once considered impossible becomes reality. Living in space is described as a superhero-like experience, filled with excitement and fun. The dreams and imagination of young kids are celebrated, as they inspire the exploration of space. The exhibit "Moving Beyond Earth" showcases fictional stories that align with the dreams of space exploration. The message is clear: no dream is impossible, and the spirit of thousands of dreamers makes it all possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to story time from space.
Speaker 1: And I'd like to help you understand why it's a place that is magic.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 3: You see, my boy is nature's way. Upon the weak, the strong ones pray.
Speaker 0: I used to work for a man named Wernher von Braun. He believed that the youth of America was a very valuable resource.
Speaker 1: I started saying I wanted to be an astronaut when I was 5 years old.
Speaker 0: And his concern was that we must prepare for the next generation of space travel. And to do that, we must have a bright, Challenging young group of people coming up to to meet the requirements of our next effort. I interviewed 4 times over 12 years.
Speaker 4: At some point in the future, we'll look back and say, how did we do it without space?
Speaker 5: I am absolutely convinced. The emphasis here on space is absolutely vital to our New world order. When we are successful, And we will be. We had a real chance at this new world order.
Speaker 6: We must have a bright, Challenging young group of people.
Speaker 3: It would be many years yet before our plans can fully materialized.
Speaker 4: We'll look back and say, how did we do it without space?
Speaker 1: And the magic begin.
Speaker 7: Into worlds beyond our wildest imagination. Is it the future. Is it the key to reaching the stars,
Speaker 6: or is it just 5 totally awesome
Speaker 8: days away from mom and dad?
Speaker 7: Fantasyland. Here is a world of imagination, hopes, and dreams. Magic and make believe are reborn, and fairy tales come true. Fantasyland is dedicated to the young and the young in heart, to those who believe that when you wish upon a star, your dreams do come true. Rejected by NASA 7 times, but the 8th time.
Discoveries that were miracles a few short years ago are accepted as commonplace today. Many of the things that seem impossible now will become realities tomorrow.
Speaker 1: My favorite part about living up there was the flying. I loved it. It was like being Peter Pan.
Speaker 7: Everybody's a superhero. You're not floating. You're flying.
Speaker 3: How to remember if you wake up late at night or something and get out of bed that you're not back on the space station. Because if you if you think you're back on the space station, you'll jump out of bed, try to float to go to another room, and end up on the floor.
Speaker 5: The school kids we show these 2 always like those scenes. For millions and millions of young kids.
Speaker 3: This is what it's about. We are having fun. We are excited.
Speaker 7: Burrito of awesomeness smothered in awesome sauce.
Speaker 5: All the dreams you've created in other people's minds,
Speaker 7: Other young kids.
Speaker 3: Let's, dream a little. For so many, that's really what it is all about.
Speaker 5: I did submit 7 applications along the way. Feature of space This travel is being written right now in
Speaker 7: the dreams and imagination.
Speaker 5: Writers of fiction have dreamed of such a journey, a long impossible dream.
Speaker 9: The stories that they tell
Speaker 10: a fit especially well in this exhibit, moving beyond Earth.
Speaker 2: We could only dream.
Speaker 11: Fiction means it's a made up story. Fiction means it's a made up story.
Speaker 12: Into the solar system and into into,
Speaker 13: beyond into the distant galaxies.
Speaker 11: Fiction means it's a made up story.
Speaker 5: Imagination Little to explore.
Speaker 11: It was the work of thousands of dreamers. Thanks to their invincible spirit.
Speaker 5: Interviewed 5 times before I was selected.
Speaker 7: No dream is impossible.
Speaker 13: And I would love to be a last time when the free.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be a robot
Speaker 4: You think that's a hit in elementary schools? Those little minds?
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
‘200 Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball’ by Eric Dubay https://t.co/SjzDrFiH65
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video presents 200 proofs against the mainstream scientific model of a spinning ball Earth. It challenges the horizon always appearing flat, water maintaining its level, and rivers flowing uphill. The video questions the existence of gravity and argues for a flat Earth based on various observations and experiments. It also questions the accuracy of flight durations and the authenticity of NASA's images. The video concludes that the Earth is not a globe, suggesting a geocentric, flat Earth and implicating Freemasons in a conspiracy to deceive the masses. It calls for a rejection of these false ideas and a reevaluation of the heliocentric theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 200 Proofs Earth is not a spinning ball by Eric Dubey. 1. The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane, and drone footage Show a completely flat horizon over 20 plus miles high. Only NASA and other government space agencies show curvature in their fake CGI photos and videos.
2, the horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended, the horizon would stay fixed and the observer would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it. 3, the natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling, and hurtling through infinite space, then truly flat consistently level surfaces would not exist here, but since earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense. 4, Rivers run down to sea level, finding the easiest course, north, south, east, west, and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time.
If earth were truly a spinning ball, then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill. For example, the Mississippi in its 3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico. 5. One portion of the Nile River flows for a 1000 miles with a fall of only 1 foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball earth, Would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down.
This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay, and other long rivers. Six. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, as NASA and modern astronomy claim, Spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level.
7, Surveyors, engineers, and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges, and tunnels, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature. 8. The Suez Canal, connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea, is a 100 miles long without any locks, Making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the 2 seas. When constructed, the Earth's supposed curvature was not taken into account.
It was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water's surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. 9, engineer w Winkler was published in the Earth Review regarding the Earth's supposed curvature stating, as an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in schoolbooks. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals, and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this, that it is 8 inches for the 1st mile of a canal and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles, thus a small navigable canal for boats, say, 30 miles long will have, by the above rule, an allowance for curvature of 600 feet.
Think of that, and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 6 100 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal than of wasting our time trying to square the circle. 10. The London and North Western Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool.
The railroad's highest point midway at Birmingham Station is only 240 feet above sea level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, The 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raised over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. 11. A surveyor and engineer of 30 years published in the Birmingham Weekly, Mercury, stated, I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of Civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, Yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are incapable of any practical illustration.
All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as true levels or flats. There are, of course, Partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to 8 inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance could not be worked by any engine that was ever yet constructed. Taking 1 station with another all over England and Scotland, It may be stated that all the platforms are on the same relative level. The distance between eastern and western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles.
If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon 3 miles higher than a cord drawn from the 2 extremities. If such was the case, there is not a driver or stoker within the kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits as running trains round spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough. Vertical curves would be a 1000 times worse, and with our rolling stock Constructed as at present physically impossible.
12. The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in The Earth Review stated, It is customary in railway and canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out public works to make allowances for the curvature of the Earth. 13. In a 19th century French experiment by MMBO and Arago, a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on the summit of Desierto del Palmas in Spain, and able to be seen all the way from Capri on the island of Aviso.
Since the elevation of the two points were identical and the distance between covered nearly a 100 miles. If the earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the light should have been more than 66 100 feet, a mile and a quarter, below the line of sight. 14. The Lieutenant Colonel Portlock experiment Used Oxyhydrogen Drummond's lights and heliostats to reflect the sun's rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St. George's Channel.
If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Portlock's light should have remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature. 15. If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into outer space, a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 miles per hour would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet over half a mile every minute. Otherwise, without compensation, in 1 hour's time, the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected. 16.
The experiment known as Ares failure proved that stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct. 17, Olber's paradox states that if there were billions of stars, sky would present us a uniform luminosity since there could exist absolutely no point in all that background at which would not exist a star. In fact, Olber's paradox is no more a paradox than George 1. 18.
The Michelson Morley and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to Earth's assumed motion through space. After measuring in every possible different direction in various locations, They failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again improving the stationary geocentric model. 19. Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved around the sun, The change in relative position of the stars after 6 months' orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the Stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede.
In actual fact, however, after 190,000,000 miles of The supposed orbit around the sun, not a single inch parallax can be detected in the stars, proving that we have not moved at all. 20. If Earth were truly constantly spinning eastwards at over a 1000 miles per hour, vertically fired cannonballs and other projectiles should Fall significantly due west. In actual fact, however, when this has been tested, vertically fired cannonballs Shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the ground no more than 2 feet away from the Often directly back into the muzzle. 21.
If the Earth were truly constantly spinning eastward at over a 1000 miles per hour, Helicopters and hot air balloons should be able to simply hover over the surface of the earth and wait for their destinations to come to them. 22. If earth were truly constantly spinning eastward at over a 1000 miles per hour, during the Red Bull Stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, Spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico should have landed 25 100 miles west into the Pacific Ocean, but instead landed a few dozen miles east of the take off point. 23. Ball believers often claim gravity magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower atmosphere of the Earth imperfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non spinning, nongravitized, Non atmosphere of infinite vacuum space.
Such nonsensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, Smoke, planes, and projectiles, all of which would behave very differently if both the ball earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastward at a 1000 miles per hour. 24. If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastward over 1,000 miles per hour, then north south facing cannons should establish control while east firing cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others while west firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction cannons are fired, the distance covered is always the same. 25.
If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over a 1000 miles per hour, then the average commercial airliner traveling 500 miles per hour Should never be able to reach its eastward destinations before they come speeding up from behind. Likewise, westward destinations should be arrived at thrice the speed, But this is not the case. 26. Quoting Heaven and Earth by Gabriel Henriette If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus, There is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the earth was wrong on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the earth's rotation. If the earth rotates, as it is said, at a 1000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, It is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute.
On the other hand, if flying took place in the opposite direction to that of the rotation, A distance of 1500 miles would be covered in 1 hour instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of a 1000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the Earth's rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft Flying at this rate, in the same direction as that of the rotation, could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in midair over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal. 27. If earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over a 1000 miles Per hour, landing airplanes on such fast moving runways, which face all manner of directions, north, south, east, west, and otherwise, Would be practically impossible.
Yet in reality such fictional concerns are completely negligible. 28. If the earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over a 1000 miles per hour, then clouds, wind, and weather patterns not casually and unpredictably go every which way with clouds often traveling in opposing directions at varying altitudes simultaneously. 29. If the earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over a 1000 miles per hour, this should somewhere, somehow, be Seen, heard, felt, or measured by someone, yet no one in history has ever experienced this alleged eastward motion.
Meanwhile, however, we can hear, feel, and Experimentally measure even the slightest westward breeze. 30. In his book South Sea Voyages, Arctic and Antarctic explorer Sir James Clark Ross described his experience on the night of November 27, 18 39, In his conclusion that the Earth must be motionless, the sky being very clear, it enabled us to observe the higher stratum of clouds to be moving in an exactly opposite direction to that of the wind, a circumstance which is frequently recorded in our meteorological journal both in the northeast and southeast trades and has also often been observed by former voyagers, captain Basil Hall witnessed it from the summit of the peak of Tenerife and Count Trzilecchi, on ascending the volcanic mountain of Kirania in Owyhee, reached at 4000 feet an elevation above that of the trade wind and experienced the influence of an opposite current of air of a different hydrometric and thermometric condition. Count Stralecki further informed me of the following seemingly anomalous circumstance that at the height of 6,000 feet, he found the current of air blowing at right angles to both the lower strata, also of a different thermometric condition, but warmer than the interstratum.
Such a state of the atmosphere is compatible only with the fact which other evidence has demonstrated that the Earth is at rest. 31. Quoting Zetetic Cosmogeny, Thomas Winship states, Let imagination picture to the mind what force air would have which was set in motion by a spherical body of 8 1000 miles in diameter, which in 1 hour was spinning round a 1000 miles per hour rushing through space at 65,000 miles per hour and gyrating across the heavens? Then let conjecture endeavor to discover whether the inhabitants on such a globe could keep the hair on. If the Earth globe rotates on its axis at the terrific rate of a 1000 miles per hour, such an immense mass would have necessity caused a tremendous rush of wind in the space it occupied.
The wind would go all one way, and anything like The clouds which got within the sphere of influence of the rotating sphere would have to go the same way. The fact that the Earth is at rest is proved by kite flying. 32. If gravity is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world's oceans, buildings, people, and Sphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for gravity to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and Planes to take off and travel freely unabated in any direction. 33.
If gravity is credited with being a force Strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures to swim through such forcefully held water. 34. Ship captains in navigating great distances at sea never need to factor the supposed curvature of the earth into their calculations. Both plain sailing and the great circle sailing, the most popular navigation methods, use plane, not spherical, trigonometry, Making all mathematical calculations on the assumption that the Earth is perfectly flat. If the Earth were in fact a sphere, such an errant assumption would lead to constantly glaring inaccuracies.
Plain sailing has worked perfectly fine in both theory and practice for 1000 of years, however, And plane trigonometry has time and again proven more accurate than spherical trigonometry in determining distances across the oceans. Thirty five. If the Earth were truly a globe, then every line of latitudes south of the equator would have to measure a gradually smaller and smaller circumference this farther south travel. If, however, the Earth is an extended plane, then every line of latitudes south of the equator should measure a gradually larger and larger circumference the farther south traveled. The fact that many captains navigating south of the equator, Assuming the globular theory have found themselves drastically out of reckoning, more so the farther south traveled, testifies to the fact that Earth is not a ball.
36. During captain James Clark Ross's voyages around the Antarctic circumference, he often wrote in his journal, perplexed at how they routinely found themselves out of accordance with their charts, stating that they found themselves an average of 12 to 16 miles outside their reckoning every day, Later on further south as much as 29 miles. 37. Lieutenant Charles Wilkes commanded a United States Navy Exploration expedition to the Antarctic from 18/38 to 18/42, and in his journals also mention being consistently east of his reckoning, Sometimes over 20 miles in less than 18 hours. 38.
To quote Reverend Thomas Milner, In the southern hemisphere, navigators to India have often fancied themselves east of the Cape when still west and have been driven ashore on the African coast, which according to their reckoning lay behind them. This misfortune happened to a fine forget, the Challenger, in 18/45. How came her majesty's ship conqueror to be lost? How have so many other noble vessels, perfectly sound, perfectly manned, perfectly navigated, been wrecked in calm weather, not only in dark night or in a fog, but in broad daylight and sunshine, in the former case, Upon the coasts and the ladder upon sunken rocks from being out of reckoning? The simple answer is that earth is not a ball.
39. Practical distance measurements taken from the Australian Handbook Almanac Shippers and Importers Directory State that the straight line distance between Sydney and Nelson is 1550 statute miles. Their given difference in longitude is 22 degrees 2 minutes and 14 seconds. Therefore, if 22 degrees 2 minutes 14 seconds out of 360 is 1550 miles. The entirety would measure 25,182 miles.
This is not only larger than the ball earth is said to be at the equator, but a whole 4,262 miles greater than it would be at Sydney's southern latitude on a globe of set proportions. 40, from near Cape Horn, Chile To Port Phillip in Melbourne, Australia, the distance is 10,500 miles, or 143 degrees of longitude, away. Factoring in the remaining degrees to 360 makes for a total distance of 26,430 miles around this particular latitude, which is over a 1500 miles wider than the Earth is supposed to be at the equator and many more thousands of miles wider than it is supposed to be at such southern latitudes. 41. Similar calculations made from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa to Melbourne, Australia At an average latitude of 35.5 degrees South, if given an approximate figure of over 25,000 miles, is again equal to or greater than the Earth's supposed greatest circumference at the equator.
The calculations from Sydney, Australia to Wellington, New Zealand at an average of thirty seven 0.5 degrees south, if given an approximate circumference of 25,500 miles greater still. According to the ball Earth theory, the circumference of the Earth at 37.5 degrees southern latitude should be only 19,757 statute miles, almost 6,000 miles less than such practical measurements. 42, in the ball Earth model, Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees south latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers, including captain Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation, took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50 to 60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica Traversing 69,000 miles.
This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model. 43. If Earth was a ball, there are several flights in the southern hemisphere which would have their quickest, straightest path over the Antarctic continent, Such as Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia, instead of taking the shortest, quickest route in a straight line over Antarctica, All such flights detour all manner of directions away from Antarctica, instead claiming the temperatures too cold for airplane travel. Considering the fact that there are plenty of flights to, from, and over Antarctica, and NASA claims to have technology keeping them in conditions both Far colder and far hotter than any experienced on earth. Such an excuse is clearly just an excuse, and these flights aren't made because they are impossible.
44. If Earth was a ball and Antarctica was too cold to fly over, the only logical way to fly from Sydney to Santiago would be a straight shot over the Pacific, staying in the southern hemisphere the entire way. Refueling could be done in New Zealand or other southern hemisphere destinations along the way if absolutely necessary. In actual fact, however, Santiago to Sydney flights go into the northern hemisphere making stopovers at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.
45. On a ball Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean With convenient refueling possibilities on Marietta or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights Curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong, or Malaysia, all of which make no sense on the ball but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth. 46. On a ball Earth, Cape Town, South Africa to Buenos Aires, Argentina should be a straight shot over the Atlantic following the same line of latitude across, But instead, every flight goes to connecting locations in the northern hemisphere first, stopping over anywhere from London to Turkey to Dubai.
Once again, these make absolutely no sense on the globe, but are completely understandable options when mapped on a flat earth. 47. On a ball Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Sao Paulo, Brazil should be a quick straight shot along the 25th southern latitude, But instead, nearly every flight makes a refueling stop at the 50th degree north latitude in London first. The only reason such a ridiculous stopover works in reality is because the Earth is flat. 48.
On a ball Earth, Santiago, Chile to Johannesburg, South Africa should be an easy flight all taking place below the Tropic of Capricorn in the southern hemisphere, Yet every listed flight makes a curious refueling stop in Senegal near the Tropic of Cancer in the North Hemisphere first. When mapped on a flat Earth, the reason why is clear to see. However, Senegal is actually directly in a straight line path halfway between the two. 49. If Earth were a spinning ball heated by a sun 93,000,000 miles away, it would be impossible to have simultaneously sweltering summers in Africa While just a few 1000 miles away, bone chilling frozen Arctic and Antarctic winters experiencing little to no heat from the sun whatsoever.
If the heat from the sun traveled 93,000,000 miles to the Sahara Desert, it is absurd to assert that another 4,000 miles, point zero zero zero zero four percent further to Antarctica would completely negate such Filtering heat resulting in such drastic differences. 50. If the Earth were truly a globe, the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions And areas of comparable latitude north and south of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics, such as comparable temperatures, Seasonal changes, length of daylight, plant and animal life. In reality, however, the Arctic and Antarctic regions, in areas of comparable latitude north and south of the equator differ greatly in many ways, entirely inconsistent with the Ball Model and entirely consistent with the Flat Model. 51.
Antarctica is by far the coldest place on Earth, with an average annual temperature of approximately minus 57 degrees Fahrenheit and a record low of minus 135.8. The average annual temperature at the North Pole, however, is a comparatively warm 4 degrees. Throughout the year, Temperatures in the Antarctic vary less than half the amount at comparable Arctic latitudes. The northern Arctic region enjoys moderately warm summers in manageable winters, whereas the southern Antarctic region never even warms enough to melt the perpetual snow and ice, On a tilting, wobbling ball Earth spinning uniformly around the sun, Arctic and Antarctic temperatures and seasons should not vary so greatly. 52.
Iceland, at 65 degrees north latitude, is home to 8 70 species of native Plants and abundant various animal life. Compare this with the Isle of Georgia at just 54 degrees south latitude, where there are only 18 species of native plants an animal life is almost nonexistent. The same latitude as Canada or England in the north where dense forests of various tall trees abound, The infamous captain Cook wrote of Georgia that he was unable to find a single shrub large enough to make a toothpick. Cook wrote, Not a tree was to be seen. The lands which lie to the south are doomed by nature to perpetual frigidness, never to feel the warmth of the sun's rays, whose horrible and savage aspect I have not words to describe.
Even marine life is sparse in certain tracts of vast extent, and the seabird is seldom observed flying over such lonely wastes. The contrast between the limits of Organic life in the Arctic and Antarctic zones is very remarkable and significant. 53. At places of comparable latitude, North and South, The sun behaves very differently than it would on a spinning ball earth, but precisely how it should on a flat earth. For example, the longest summer days north of the equator are much longer than those south of the equator, and the shortest winter days north of the equator are much shorter than the shortest south of the equator.
This is inexplicable on a uniformly spinning, wobbling ball earth, but fits exactly on a flat model with the sun traveling circles over and around the earth from tropic to tropic. Fifty four. At places of comparable latitude North and South, dawn and dusk happen very differently than they would on a spinning ball, But precisely how they should on a flat Earth. In the North, dawn and dusk come slowly and last far longer than in the South, Where they come and go very quickly. Certain places in the North, twilight can last for over an hour, while at comparable southern latitudes, within a few minutes the sunlight completely disappears.
This is inexplicable on a uniformly spinning, wobbling ball earth, but is exactly what is expected on a flat earth with the sun traveling faster, wider circles over the south and slower, narrower circles over the north. 55. If the sun circles over and around the earth every 24 hours, Steadily traveling from tropic to tropic every 6 months, it follows that the northern central region would annually receive far more heat and sunlight than the southern circumferential region. Since the sun must sweep over the larger southern region in the same 24 hours it has to pass over the smaller northern region, its passage must necessarily be proportionally faster as well. This perfectly explains the differences in Arctic and Antarctic temperatures, Seasons, length of daylight, plant and animal life.
This is why the Antarctic morning dawn and evening twilight are very abrupt compared to the north, And this explains why many midsummer Arctic nights the sun does not set at all. 56. The midnight sun is an Arctic phenomenon occurring Annually, during the summer solstice, where for several days straight, an observer significantly far enough north can watch the sun traveling circles overhead, Rising and falling in the sky throughout the day, but never fully setting, for upwards of 72 plus hours. If the Earth we're actually a spinning globe revolving around the sun, the only place such a phenomenon as the midnight sun could be observed would be at the poles. Any other vantage point from 89 degrees latitude downwards could never, regardless of any tilt or inclination, see the sun for 24 hours straight.
To see the sun for an entire revolution on a spinning globe at a point other than the poles, you would have to be looking through miles and miles of land at the sea for part of the revolution. 57. The establishment claims the midnight sun is experienced in Antarctica, but they conveniently do not have any uncut videos showing this, nor do they allow independent explorers to travel to Antarctica during the winter solstice to verify or refute these claims. Conversely, there are dozens of uncut videos publicly available showing the Arctic midnight sun, and it has been verified beyond any shadow of a doubt. 58.
The Royal Belgian Geographical Society, in their expedition Antarctic Belge, recorded that during the most Severe part of the Antarctic winter, from 71 degrees south latitude onwards, the sun sets on May 17 and is not seen above the horizon again until July 21. This is completely at odds with the ball Earth theory, but easily explained by the Flat Earth Model. The midnight sun is seen from high altitudes Latitudes in extreme northern latitudes during Arctic summer because the sun, at its innermost cycle, is circling tightly enough around the polar center that it remains visible above the horizon for someone at such a vantage point. Likewise, in extreme southern latitudes during Arctic summer, the sun completely disappears from view for over 2 months, because there at the northern tropic, the innermost arc of its boomerang journey, the sun is circling the northern center too tightly to be seen from the Southern Circumference. 59.
Quoting Gabriel Henriette, The theory of the rotation of the earth may once and for all be definitely disposed of as impracticable by pointing out the following inadvertence. It is said that the rotation takes 24 hours and that its speed is uniform, in which case, necessarily, days nights should have an identical duration of 12 hours each All the year round, the sun should invariably rise in the morning and set in the evening at the same hours, with the result that it would be the equinox every day from the 1st January to the 31 December. One should stop and reflect on this before saying that the earth has a movement of rotation. How does the system of gravitation account for the seasonal variations in the length of days nights if the Earth rotates at a uniform speed in 24 hours? 60.
Anyone can prove the sea horizon perfectly straight and the earth perfectly flat using nothing more than a level, tripods, and a wooden plank. At any altitude above sea level, simply fix a 6 to 12 foot long smooth leveled board edge rise upon tripods And observe the skyline from eye level behind it. The distant horizon will always appear perfectly level with the upper edge of the board. Furthermore, if you move in a half circle from one end of the board to the other whilst observing the skyline over the upper edge, you will be able to trace a clear, flat 10 to 20 miles depending on your altitude. This would be impossible if the earth were a globe 25,000 miles in circumference.
The horizon would align over the center of the board, but then gradually noticeably decline towards the extremities. Just 10 miles on each side would necessitate an easily visible curvature of 66.6 feet from each end to the center. 60 1. If the Earth were actually a big ball 25,000 miles in circumference, The horizon would be noticeably curved even at sea level, and everything on or approaching the horizon would appear to tilt backwards slightly from your perspective. Distant buildings along the horizon would all look like Leaning Towers of Pisa falling away from the observer.
A hot air balloon taking off, then drifting steadily away from you On a ball Earth would slowly and constantly appear to lean back more and more the farther away it flew, the bottom of the basket coming gradually into view as the top The balloon disappears from sight. In reality, however, buildings, balloons, trees, people, anything and everything at right angles to the ground and horizon Remain so regardless the distance or height of the observer. 62. Samuel Rowbotham's experiments at the Old Bedford level Proved conclusively the canal's water to be completely flat over a 6 mile stretch. 1st, he stood in the canal with his telescope held 8 inches above the surface of the water.
Then his friend in a boat with a 5 foot tall flag sailed the 6 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, The 6 mile stretch of water should have comprised an arc exactly 6 feet high in the middle, so the entire boat and flag should have ultimately disappeared, when in fact the entire boat and flag remained visible at the same height for the entire journey. 63. In a second experiment, doctor Robotham affixed flags 5 feet high along the shoreline, 1 at every mile marker, then using his telescope mounted at 5 feet Just behind the 1st flag looked over the tops of all 6 flags, which lined up in a perfectly straight line. If the Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the flags have progressively dipped down after the 1st establishing line of sight, the 2nd would have descended 8 inches, 32 inches for the 3rd, 6 feet for the 4th, 10 feet 8 inches for the 5th and 16 feet 8 inches for the 6th.
64. Quoting Earth Not a Globe by Samuel Rowbotham, It is known that the horizon at sea, whatever distance it may extend to the right and left of the observer on land, always appears as a straight line. The following experiment has been tried in various parts of the country. At Brighton, on a rising ground near the racecourse, 2 poles were affixed in the Earth 6 yards apart and directly opposite the sea. Between these poles, a line was tightly stretched parallel to the horizon.
From the center of the line, the view embraced not less than 20 miles on each side making a distance of 40 miles. A vessel was observed sailing directly westwards. The line cut the rigging a little above the bulwarks, which it did for several hours or until the vessel had sailed the whole distance of 40 miles, the ship coming into view from the east would have to ascend an inclined plane for 20 miles until it arrived at the center of the arc once it would have to descend for the same distance. The square of 20 miles multiplied by 8 inches gives 2 66 feet as the amount the vessel would be below the line at the beginning and at the end of the 40 miles. 65, also quoting Doctor.
Robotham, on a shore near Waterloo, A few miles to the north of Liverpool, a good telescope was fixed at an elevation of 6 feet above the water. It was directed to a large steamer Just leaving the River Mersey and sailing out to Dublin. Gradually, the masthead of the receding vessel came nearer to the horizon until at length, After more than 4 hours had elapsed, it disappeared. The ordinary bait of sailing of the Dublin steamers was fully 8 miles an hour so that the vessel would be at least 32 miles distant when the masthead came to the horizon. The 6 feet of elevation of the telescope would require 3 miles to be deducted for convexity, which would leave 29 miles, the square of which multiplied by 8 inches gives 560 feet, Deducting 80 feet for the height of the main mast, and we find that according to the doctrine of fraternity, the masthead of the outward bound steamer should have been 480 feet below the horizon.
Many other experiments of this kind have been made upon seagoing steamers and always with results entirely incompatible with the theory that the Earth is a globe. 66. Doctor. Robotham conducted several other experiments using telescopes, spirit levels, sextants, and theodolites, special precision instruments used for measuring angles in Dontaler vertical planes. By positioning them at equal heights aimed at each other successively, he proved over and over the earth to be perfectly flat for miles Without a single inch of curvature.
His findings caused quite a stir in the scientific community, and thanks to 30 years of his efforts, The shape of the earth became a hot topic of debate around the turn of 19th century. 67. The distance Across the Irish Sea from the Isle of Man's Douglas Harbour to Great Ormshead in North Wales is 60 miles. If the Earth was a globe, then the surface of the water between them would form a 60 mile arc, center towering 1944 feet higher than the coastlines at either end. It is well known and easily verifiable, however, that on a clear day from a modest altitude of a 100 feet, the Great Orme's Head is visible from Douglas Harbor.
This would be completely impossible on a globe of 25,000 miles. Assuming the 100 foot altitude causes the horizon to appear approximately 13 miles off, 47 miles remaining means the Welsh coastline should still fall an impossible 14 72 feet below the line of sight. 68. The Philadelphia skyline is clearly visible from Apple Pie Hill in the New Jersey Pine Barrens 40 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, factoring in the 205 foot elevation of Apple Pie Hill, the Philly skyline should remain well hidden beyond 335 feet of curvature.
69. The New York City skyline is clearly visible from Harriman State Park's bare mountains 60 miles miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, viewing from Bear Mountain's 1283 foot summit, The Pythagorean theorem determining distance to the horizon being 1.23 times the square root of the height in feet, New York City skyline should be invisible behind 170 feet of curved From Washington's Rock in New Jersey, at just a 400 foot elevation, it is possible on a clear day to see the skylines of both New York and Philadelphia in opposite directions at the same time covering a total distance of 120 miles. If earth threw a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Both of these skylines should be hidden behind over 800 feet of earth's curvature. 71.
It is often possible to see the Chicago skyline from sea levels 60 miles away across Lake Michigan. In 2015, after photographer Joshua Nowicki Photographed this phenomenon. Several news channels quickly claimed his picture to be a superior mirage, an atmospheric anomaly caused by temperature inversion. While these certainly do occur, the skyline in question was facing right side up and clearly seen, unlike a hazy, illusory mirage And on a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference should be 2,400 feet below the horizon. 72.
October 16, 18/54. The Times newspaper reported the Queen's visit to Great Grimsby from Hull, Recording they were able to see the 300 foot tall dock tower from 70 miles away. On a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, Factoring their 10 foot elevation above the water and the tower's 300 foot height at 70 miles away, the dock tower should have remained an entire two thousand Eric Dubet. 1, 600 feet below the horizon. 73.
In 18/72, captain Gibson and crewmates, sailing the ship Thomas Wood from China to London, reported seeing the entirety of Saint Helena Island on a clear day from 75 miles away. Factoring in their height During measurement, on a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, it was found the island should have been 3,650 feet below their line of sight. 74. From Genoa, Italy, at a height of just 70 feet above sea level, the island of Gorgona can often be seen 81 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Gorgona should be hidden beyond 3,332 feet of curvature.
75. From Genoa, Italy, at a height of just 70 feet above sea level, the island of Corsica often be seen 99 miles away. If Earth were of all 25,000 miles in circumference, Corsica should fall 5,200 and 45 feet, almost an entire mile below the horizon. 76. From Genoa, Italy, 70 feet above sea level, The island of Caprea, a 102 miles away, can often be seen as well.
If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Caprias should always remain hidden behind 5,605 feet over a mile of supposed curvature. 77. Also from Genoa, on bright clear days, the island of Elba can be seen an incredible 125 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Elba should be forever invisible behind 8,770 feet of curvature. 78.
From Anchorage, Alaska, at an elevation of 102 feet, on clear days, Mount Foraker can be seen with the naked eye 120 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Mount Foraker's 17,400 foot summit should be leaning back away from the observer, covered by 7,719 feet of curved earth. In reality, however, the entire mountain can be quite easily seen standing straight from base to summit. 79. From Anchorage, Alaska, at an elevation of 102 feet, on clear days, Mount McKinley can be seen The naked eye from a 130 miles away.
If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Mount McKinley's 20,320 foot summit should be leaning back away from the observer and almost half covered by 9,220 feet of curved earth. In reality, however, the entire mountain can be quite easily seen standing straight from base to summit. Eighty. In Chambers' journal, February 18, 95, a sailor near Mauritius in the Indian Ocean reported having seen a vessel which turned out to be an incredible 200 miles away. The incident caused much heated debate in nautical circles at the time, gaining further confirmation in Aden, Yemen, where another witness reported seeing a missing Bombay steamer from 200 miles away.
He correctly stated the precise appearance, location, and direction of the steamer, all later corroborated and confirmed correct by those on board. Such sightings are absolutely inexplicable if the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles around, as ships 200 miles distant would have to fall approximately 5 miles below line of sight. 81. The distance from which various lighthouse lights around the world are visible at sea far exceeds what could be found on a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference. For example, the Dunkirk light in southern France at an altitude of 194 feet is visible from a boat 10 feet above sea level, 28 miles away.
Spherical trigonometry dictates that if the Earth was a globe with the given curvature of 8 inches As per mile squared, this light should be hidden a 190 feet below the horizon. 82. The Port Nicholson light in New Zealand is four 120 feet above sea level and visible from 35 miles away where it should be 220 feet below the horizon. 83. The Ikaros light in Norway is 154 feet above high water and visible from 28 statute miles, where it should be 230 feet below the horizon.
84. The light at Madras on the esplanade Is 132 feet high and visible from 28 miles away, where it should be 250 feet below the line of sight. Eighty five. The cordoned light on the west coast of France is 207 feet high, invisible from 31 miles away, where it should be 280 feet below the line of sight. 86.
The light at Cape Bonavista, Newfoundland, 150 feet above sea level and visible at 35 miles, where it should be 4 91 feet below the horizon. 87. The lighthouse steeple of St. Boltoff's Paris Church in Boston is 290 feet tall and visible from over 40 miles away, it should be hidden a full 800 feet below the horizon. 88.
The Isle of Wight Lighthouse in England is 180 feet high It can be seen up to 42 miles away, a distance at which modern astronomers say the light should fall 996 feet below the line of sight. 89. The Cape Lagulas Lighthouse in South Africa is 33 feet high, 238 Feet above sea level and can be seen for over 50 miles. If the world were a globe, this light would fall 1400 feet below an observer's line of sight. 90.
The Statue of Liberty in New York stands 326 feet above sea level, and on a clear day can be seen as far as 60 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, that would put Lady Liberty at an impossible 2,074 feet below the horizon. 91. The lighthouse at Port Said, Egypt, at an elevation of only 60 feet, has been seen an astonishing 58 miles away, Where, according to modern astronomy, it should be 2,182 feet below the line of sight. 92.
The Notre Dame Antwerp spire stands 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasbourg measuring 468 feet above Sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon, and captains declare they can see the Theatrial spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, however, at that distance, the spire should be an entire mile 5,280 feet below the horizon. 93. The Saint George's Channel between Holyhead and King Stone Harbor near Dublin is 60 miles across.
When halfway across, a ferry passenger will notice behind them the light on Holyhead Pier as well as, in front of them, the Pull bag light in Dublin Bay. The Holyhead Pier light is 44 feet high, while the pull bag lighthouse 68 feet. Therefore, a vessel in the middle of the channel, 30 miles from either side, standing on a deck 24 feet above the water, can clearly see both lights. On a ball earth 25,000 miles in circumference, however, both lights should be hidden well below both horizons by over 300 feet. 94.
From the highland near Portsmouth Harbor in Hampshire, England, looking across Spithead to the Isle of Wight, the entire base of the island, where water and land come together, composes a perfectly straight line 22 statute miles long. According to the ball earth theory, the Isle of Wight should decline 80 feet from the center on each side to account for the necessary curvature. The crosshairs of a good theater light directed there, however, have repeatedly shown the land and water line to be perfectly level. 95. On a clear day from the high head near Douglas Harbour on the Isle of Man, the whole length of the coast of North Wales is often plainly visible to the naked eye.
From the point of ear at the mouth of the River Dee to Holyhead comprises a 50 mile stretch which has also been repeatedly found to be perfectly horizontal. If the Earth actually had curvature of 8 inches per mile squared, as NASA and modern astronomy claim, the 50 mile length of Welsh coast seen along the horizon in Liverpool full Bay would have to decline from the center point an easily detectable 416 feet on each side. 96, From 100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe by William Carpenter. If we take the journey down Chesapeake Bay by night, We shall see the light exhibited at Sharps Island for an hour before the steamer gets to it. We may take up a position on deck so that the rail of the vessel's side will be in a line with the light And in the line of sight, and we shall find that in the whole journey, the light won't vary in the slightest degree in its apparent elevation.
Let's say that a distance of 13 miles has been traversed. The astronomer's theory of curvature demands a difference one way or the other In the apparent elevation of the light of 112 feet 8 inches. Since, however, there is not a difference of 100 hairs' breaths, we have a plain proof that the water of the Chesapeake Bay is not curved, which is a proof that the Earth is not a globe. 97. NASA and modern astronomy say the Earth is a giant ball tilted back, wobbling and spinning 1,000 miles per hour Around its central axis, traveling 67,000 miles per hour, circles around the sun, spiraling 500,000 miles per hour around the Milky Way While the entire galaxy rockets a ridiculous 670,000,000 miles through the universe, with all of these motions originating from an alleged big bang cosmogenic explosion 14000000000 years ago.
That's a grand total of 67,568,000 miles per hour in several different directions we're all supposedly speeding along at simultaneously, yet no one has ever seen, felt, heard, measured, or proven a single one of these motions to exist whatsoever. 98, NASA and modern astronomy say Polaris, the North Pole Star, is somewhere between 323 and 4 34 light years, or about 2 quadrillion miles, away from us. Firstly, note that is between 1 quadrillion 938 trillion to 2 quadrillion very strong understanding of the world's history and the world's history. We have a very strong understanding of the world's history. We have a very strong understanding of the To stars within hundreds of trillions of miles, perhaps their science is flawed and their theory needs re examining.
However, even granting them their obscurely distant stars, it is impossible for heliocentrists to explain how Polaris manages to always remain perfectly aligned 99. Viewed from a ball Earth, Polaris, situated directly over the Earth pole, should not be visible anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere. For Polaris to be seen from the southern hemisphere of a globular Earth, the observer would have to be somehow looking through the globe, and miles of land and sea would have to be transparent. Polaris can be seen, however, up to over 20 degrees South latitude. 100.
If Earth were a ball, the Southern Cross and other southern constellations would all be visible at the same time from the cross and other southern constellations would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude as is the case in the north with Polaris and its surrounding constellations. Ursa Major and Minor and many others can be seen from every northern meridian simultaneously, whereas in the South, constellations like the Southern Cross cannot. This proves that the southern hemisphere is not turned under as in the ball model, but simply stretching further outwards away from the northern center point as in the Flat Earth model. One hundred and one. Sigma Octentus is claimed to be a southern central pole star similar to Polaris, around which the southern hemisphere stars all rotate around the opposite direction.
Unlike the direction. Unlike Polaris, however, Sigma Octantis cannot be seen simultaneously from every point along the same latitude. It is not central, but allegedly 1 degree off center, it is not motionless and in fact cannot be seen at all using publicly available telescopes. There is legitimate speculation regarding whether Cygna Octantis even exists. Either way, the direction in which stars move overhead is based on perspective and the exact Direction you're facing, not which hemisphere you're in.
102. Some heliocentrists have tried to suggest That the pole star's gradual declination overhead, as an observer travels southward, is proof of a globular Earth. Far from it, the declination of the pole star or any other object is simply a result of the law of perspective on plain, flat surfaces. The law of perspective dictates that the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes the farther one recedes from the object, until at a certain point The line of sight and the seemingly uprising surface of the earth converges to a vanishing point, I. E, the horizon line, beyond which the object is invisible.
In the ball earth model, the horizon is claimed to be the curvature of the earth, whereas in reality the horizon is known to simply be the vanishing line of perspective Based on the strength of your eyes, instruments, weather, and altitude. 103. There are several constellations which can be seen from far greater distances over face of the earth then should be possible if the world were a rotating, revolving, wobbling ball. For instance, Ursa Major very close to Polaris can be seen from 90 degrees North Latitude, the North Pole, all the way down to 30 degrees South Latitude. For this to be possible on a ball Earth, the Southern observers would have to be seen through hundreds Or thousands of miles of bulging earth to the northern sky.
104. The constellation Vulpecula Can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude all the way to 55 degrees South latitude. Taurus, Pisces, and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees Cell. An observer on a ball Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far. 105.
Aquarius in Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees South, the constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees North down to 80 degrees South, An Orion can be seen from 85 degrees north all the way to 75 degrees south latitude. These are all only possible because the hemispheres are not spheres at all, but Concentric circles of latitude extending outwards from the central North Pole with the stars rotating over and around. 106. The so called South Pole is simply an arbitrary point along the Antarctic ice marked with a red and white barbershop pole topped with a metal ball earth. The ceremonial south pole is admittedly and provably not the actual south pole, however, because the actual south pole could be demonstrably confirmed with the aid of a compass showing north to be 360 degrees around the observer.
Since this feat has never been achieved, the model remains pure theory, along with the establishment's excuse that the geomagnetic poles supposedly constantly move around making verifications of their claims impossible. 107. Ring magnets of the kind found in loudspeakers have a central north pole with the opposite the south pole actually being all points along the outer circumference. This perfectly demonstrates the magnetism of our flat earth, whereas the alleged source of magnetism in the ball earth model is emitted from a hypothetical molten magnetic core in the center of the ball, which they claim conveniently causes both poles to constantly move, thus evading independent verification at their 2 ceremonial poles. In reality, the deepest Drilling operation in history, the Russian Kola Ultra Deep managed to get only 8 miles down.
So the entire ball earth model taught in schools showing a crust, Outer mantle, inner mantle, outer core, and inner core layers are all purely speculation, as we have never penetrated through beyond the crust. 108. The mariner's compass is an impossible and nonsensical instrument for use on a ball Earth. It simultaneously points north and south over a flat surface, yet claims to be Simultaneously points north and south over a flat surface, yet claims to be pinpointing 2 constantly moving geomagnetic poles at opposite ends of a spinning sphere originating from a hypothetical molten metal core. If compass needles were actually drawn to the north pole of a globe, the opposing self needle would Arc de Bey.
1. Actually be pointing up and off into outer space. 109. There are no fixed east or west points, Just as there is no fixed south, the north central pole is the only proven fixed point on our flat earth, with the south being all straight lines outwards from the pole, east and west being concentric circles at constant right angles 90 degrees from the pole. A westerly circumnavigation of Earth is thus going around with Polaris continually on your right while an Easterly sacramanavigation is going around with Polaris always at your left.
110, Magellan and others' east west circumnavigations of Earth are often quoted as proof of the ball model. In actual fact, however, sailing or flying at right angles to the North Pole and eventually returning to one's original location is no more difficult or mysterious than doing so on a globe. Just as an architect's compass can place Eurious than doing so on a globe. Just as an architect's compass can place its center point on a flat piece of paper and trace a circle either way around the pole, so can a ship or plane circumnavigate a flat Earth. 111.
Since the North Pole and Antarctica are covered in ice and guarded no fly zones, No ships or planes have ever been known to circumnavigate the earth in north south directions. The only kind of circumnavigation which could not happen on a flat Earth, is north and southbound, which is likely the very reason for the heavily enforced flight restrictions. The fact that there is yet to be a single verified North to South circumnavigation of Earth serves as standing proof the world is not a ball. 112. The sun brings noon to every time zone as it passes directly overhead every 15 degree demarcation point 24 times per day in its Circular path over and around the Earth.
If time zones were instead caused by the uniform spinning of the ball Earth around the Sun, Every 6 months, as Earth found itself on the opposite side of the sun, clocks all over Earth would have to flip 12 hours. Day would be night, and night would be day. 113. The idea that people are standing, ships are sailing, and planes are flying upside down on certain parts of earth, While others tilted at 90 degrees and all other impossible angles, it is complete absurdity. The idea that a man digging a hole straight down could eventually reach Sky on the other side is ludicrous.
Common sense tells every free thinking person correctly that there truly is an up and down in nature, Unlike the everything is relative rhetoric of the Newtonian Einsteinian paradigm. 114. Quoting On the False Wisdom of the Philosophers by Lecancias. A sphere where people on the other side live with their feet Above their heads, where rain, snow, and hail fall upwards, where trees and crops grow upside down and the sky is lower than the ground, The ancient wonder of the hanging gardens of Babylon dwindle into nothing in comparison to the fields, seas, towns, and mountains that pagan philosophers believe to be hanging from the earth without support. 115.
The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before knighted freemason Sir Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of gravity upon the world. It is a fact that objects placed in denser mediums rise up while objects placed in Less dense mediums sink down. To fit with the heliocentric model, which has no up or down, Newton instead claimed objects are attracted to large masses and fall towards the center. Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, Cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it as Newton claims gravity does with the Earth, the sun, moon, stars, and planets. 116.
There has also never been a single experiment in history showing an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, Cause another smaller mass to orbit around it. The magic theory of gravity allows for oceans, buildings, and people to remain forever stuck to the underside of a spinning ball While simultaneously causing objects like the moon and satellites to remain locked in perpetual circular orbits around the earth. If these were both true, then people should be able to jump up and start orbiting circles around the Earth, or the Moon should have long ago been sucked into the Earth. Neither of these theories have ever been experimentally verified, and their alleged results are mutually exclusive. 117.
Newton also theorized, and it is now commonly taught, that the Earth's ocean tides are caused by gravitational lunar attraction. If the moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter and the Earth 8,000 miles, however, using their own math and law, It follows that the Earth is 87 times more massive and therefore the larger object should attract the smaller to it and not the other way around. If the earth's greater gravity is what keeps the moon in orbit, it is impossible for the moon's lesser gravity to supersede the earth's gravity, especially at earth's Sea level, or its gravitational attraction, would even further out trump the Moon's, and if the Moon's gravity truly did supersede the Earth's causing the tides to be drawn towards it, There should be nothing to stop them from continuing onwards and upwards towards their great attractor. 118. Furthermore, the velocity and path of the moon are uniform and should therefore exist a uniform influence on the earth's tide, When in actuality earth's tides vary greatly and do not follow the moon.
Earth's lakes, ponds, marshes, and other inland bodies of water also Applicably remain forever outside the Moon's gravitational grasp. If gravity was truly drawing Earth's oceans up to it, All lakes, ponds, and other bodies of standing water should certainly have tides as well. 119. It is claimed that the other planets are spheres, and so therefore Earth must also be a sphere. Firstly, Earth is a plane, not a planet, so the shape of these planets in the sky Have no bearing on the shape of the Earth beneath our feet.
Secondly, these planets have been known for 1000 of years around the world as wandering stars Since they differ from the other fixed stars in their relative motions only, when looked at with an unprejudiced naked eye or through a telescope, The fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, not spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all clearly fake computer generated images and not photographs. 120. The etymology of the word planet Actually comes from the late old English planet or from old French planet, from Latin planeta, from Greek planetes, planetae, wandering stars, or to wander of unknown origin, to spread or an ocean of spread out, From Latin, plenum, flat surface, plain level plain. They just added a t to our earth plane, and everyone bought it.
121. When you observe the sun and moon, you see 2 equally sized equidistant circles tracing similar paths at similar speeds Around a Flat Stationary Earth. The experts at NASA, however, claim your common sense everyday experience is false on all counts. To begin with, they say the Earth is not flat, but a big ball, not stationary, but spinning around 19 miles per second. They say the sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears, The Earth revolves around the sun.
The moon, on the other hand, does revolve around the Earth, though not east to west as it appears, rather west to east, And the sun is actually 400 times larger than the moon and 400 times farther away. You can clearly see they are the same size and distance. You can see the Earth is flat, you can feel the Earth is stationary, but according to the gospel of modern astronomy, you are wrong in a simpleton worthy of endless ridicule if you dare to trust your own eyes and experience. 122. Quoting Alan Dames.
If the government Or NASA had said to you that the earth is stationary. Imagine that. And then imagine we are trying to convince people that, no. No. It's not stationary.
Moving forward at 32 times rifle bullet speed and spinning at a 1000 miles per hour. We would be laughed at. We would have so many people telling us, You're crazy! The Earth's not moving! We would be ridiculed for having no scientific backing for this convoluted moving earth theory, and not only that, but then people would say, Oh, then how do you explain a fixed calm atmosphere and the sun's observable movement, how do you explain that?
Imagine saying to people, no, no, the atmosphere is moving also, But it's somehow magically Velcroed to the moving Earth. The reason is not simply because the Earth is stationary, so what we are actually doing is what makes sense. We are saying that the moving earth theory is nonsense. The stationary earth theory makes sense, and we are being ridiculed. You've got to picture it being the other way around To realize just how ridiculous the situation is.
This theory from the government and NASA that the Earth is rotating and orbiting and leaning over and wobbling is absolute nonsense, And yet people are clinging to it tightly like a teddy bear. They just can't bring themselves to face the possibility that the earth is stationary, though all evidence shows it. We feel no movement. Atmosphere hasn't been blown away. We see the sun move from east to west.
Everything can be explained by a motionless earth without bringing in all these assumptions to cover Previous assumptions gone bad. A 123. Heliocentricists' astronomical figures always sound perfectly precise, But they have historically been notorious for regularly and drastically changing them to suit their various models. For instance, in his time, Copernicus calculated the sun's distance from earth to be 3,000,391,200 miles. The next century, Johannes Kepler decided it was actually 12,000,000 376,800 miles away.
Isaac Newton once said, it matters not whether we reckon it 28 or 54,000,000 miles distant, for either would do just as well. How scientific! Benjamin Martin calculated between 81 and 82,000,000 miles. Thomas Dilworth claimed 93,000,000 726,900 miles. John Hynes dated positively 95,000,000 298,260 miles.
Benjamin Gould said more than 96,000,000 miles, and Christian Mayer thought it was more than 104,000,000. Flat Earthers throughout the ages conversely have used sextants and plane trigonometry to make such calculations and found the sun and the moon both to be only about 32 miles in diameter and less than a few 1000 miles from Earth. 124. Amateur balloon footage taken above the clouds, has provided stunning visual proof that the sun cannot be millions of miles away. In several shots, You can see a clear hot spot reflecting on the clouds directly below the sun's spotlight like influence.
If the sun were actually millions of miles away, Such a small localized hot spot could not occur. 125. Another proof the sun is not millions of miles away is found by tracing the angle of sun rays back to their source above the clouds. There are thousands of pictures showing how sunlight comes down through cloud cover at a variance of converging angles. The area of convergence is, of course, the sun and is not millions of miles away, but rather relatively close to Earth, just above the clouds.
126. The sun's annual journey from tropic to tropic, solstice to solstice is what determines the length and character of days, nights, and seasons. This is why equatorial regions experience almost year round summer and heat, while higher latitudes north and especially south experience more distinct Seasons with harsh winters. The heliocentric model claims seasons change based on the ball Earth's alleged axial tilt and elliptical orbit around the sun, Yet their flawed current model places us closest to the sun, 91,000,000 miles, in January, when it is actually winter, and farthest from the sun, 94,500,000 miles in July, when it's actually summer throughout most of the Earth. 127.
The fact that the Sun and Moon's reflections on water always form a straight line path from the horizon to the observer proves the Earth is done above. If the Earth's Surface was curved. It would be impossible for the reflected light to curve open the ball from horizon to observer. 128. There are huge centuries old stone sundials and moon dials all over the world, which still tell the time now down to the minute as perfectly as the day they were made.
If the Earth, sun, and moon were truly subject to the number of contradictory revolving, rotating, wobbling, and spiraling motions claimed by modern astronomy, would be impossible for these monuments to so accurately tell time without constant adjustment. 129. To quote William Carpenter, Why in the name of common sense should observers have to fix their telescopes on solid stone bases so that they should not move a hair's breadth? If the earth on which they fix them moves at the rate of 19 miles in a second. Indeed, to believe that 6,000,000,000,000 tons Guns is rolling, searching, flying, darting on through space forever with a velocity compared with which a shot from a cannon is a very slow coach with such unerring accuracy that a telescope fixed on granite pillars in an observatory will not enable a link side astronomer to detect a variation in its onward motion of the thousandth part of a hair's breadth is to conceive a miracle compared with which all the miracles on record put together would sink into utter insignificance.
Since we can, in middle north latitudes, see the North Star On looking out of a window that faces it and out of this very same corner of the very same pane of glass and the very same window all the year round, It is proof enough for any man and his senses that we have not made any motion at all and that the earth is not a globe. 130. From Earth Not a Globe by Samuel Rowbotham. Take 2 carefully bored metallic tubes not less than 6 feet in length And place them 1 yard asunder on the opposite sides of a wooden frame or a solid block of wood or stone, so adjust Them that their centers or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now direct them to the plane of some notable fixed Star a few seconds previous to its meridian time.
Let an observer be stationed at each tube, and the moment the star appears in the 1st tube that a loud knock or other Arc de Bey. 1. Signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the 2nd tube when he sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse Between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment By 2 parallel lines of sight when only 1 yard asunder.
A slight inclination of the 2nd tube towards the 1st tube would be required For the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their positions for 6 months, at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results. The star will be visible at the same meridian time without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes, from which it is concluded that if the earth had moved 1 single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of 1 yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in 6 months, a given meridian upon the earth's surface does not move a single yard and therefore that the Earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion. 131.
NASA and modern astronomy maintain that the moon is a solid, Plural Earth like habitation which man has actually flown to and set foot on. They claim the moon is a nonluminescent planetoid which receives and reflects all its light from the sun. The reality is, however, that the Moon is observably not a solid body. It is clearly circular, but not spherical, and not in any way an Earth like Planetoid which humans could set foot on. In fact, the moon has been proven largely transparent and completely self luminescent, Shining with its own unique light.
132. The sun's light is golden, warm, drying, preservative, and antiseptic, While the moon's light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying, and septic, the sun's rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire while the moon's rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrefy. Grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved, like raisins, dates, and prunes. Animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile, gaseous Constituents becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay.
When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction Ginnant decay. This proves that sun and moonlight are different, unique, and opposites, as they are in the geocentric flat model. 133. In direct sunlight, a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full direct moonlight, a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the sun's light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point, it can create significant heat, while the moon's light collected similarly Creates no heat.
In The Lancet Medical Journal from March 14, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which prove the moon's rays, When concentrated, can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than 8 degrees, so sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties. 134. Furthermore, the moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the sun's light. Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence. If a reflector's surface is convex, then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface, resulting in no reflection.
135. Not only is the Moon clearly self luminescent, shining its own unique light, but it is also largely transparent. When the waxing or waning Moon is visible during the day, it is possible to See the blue sky right through the moon, and on a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it's even possible to occasionally see Stars and planets directly through the surface of the Moon. The Royal Astronomical Society has on record many such occurrences Throughout history, which all defied the heliocentric model. 136.
Many people think that modern Astronomy's ability to accurately predict lunar and solar eclipses is a result and proof positive of the heliocentric theory of the universe. The fact of the matter, however, is that eclipses have been accurately predicted by cultures worldwide for 1000 of years before the Geleocentric ball Earth was even a glimmer in Copernicus's imagination. Ptolemy, in the 1st century AD, accurately predicted eclipses for 600 years on the basis of a flat stationary Earth with equal position as anyone living today. All the way back in 600 BC, Thales accurately predicted an eclipse which ended the war between the Medes and the Lydians. Eclipses happen regularly with precision in 18 year cycles, So regardless of geocentric or heliocentric, flat, or globe earth cosmologies, eclipses can be accurately calculated independent of such factors.
A 137th. Another assumption and supposed proof of the Earth's shape, heliocentrists claim that lunar eclipses are caused by the shadow of the ball earth occulting the moon. They claim the sun, Earth, and moon spheres perfectly aligned like 3 billiard balls in a row so that the sun's this light casts the Earth's shadow onto the moon. Unfortunately for heliocentrists, this explanation is rendered completely invalid due to the fact that lunar eclipses have happened and continue to happen regularly when both the sun and moon are still visible together above the horizon. For the sun's light to be casting earth's shadow onto the moon, the 3 bodies must be aligned in a straight 180 degree syzygy, but as early as the time of Pliny, There are records of lunar eclipses happening while both the sun and moon are visible in the sky.
Therefore, the eclipser of the moon cannot be the Earth or Earth's shadow, and some other explanation must be sought. A 138. Another favorite proof of ball Earthers is the appearance from an observer on shore of ships' hulls being obfuscated by the water and disappearing from view when sailing away towards the horizon. Their claim is that ships' hulls disappear before their mast heads because the ship is beginning its declination around the convex curvature of the ball earth. Once again, however, their hasty conclusion is drawn from a faulty premise, namely that only on a ball earth could this phenomenon occur.
The fact of the matter is that the law of perspective on plane surfaces dictates and necessitates the exact same occurrence. For example, a girl wearing a dress walking away towards the horizon will appear to sink into the earth the farther away she walks. Her feet will disappear from view first, and the distance between the ground and the bottom of her dress will gradually diminish until, after a half a mile, It seems like her dress is touching the ground as she walks on invisible legs. Such is the case on plain surfaces. The lowest parts of objects receiving from a given point of observation Derbation necessarily disappear before the highest.
A 139. Not only is the disappearance of ships' Hulls explained by the law of perspective on flat surfaces, it is proven undeniably true with the aid of a good telescope. If you watch a ship sailing away into the horizon with the naked eye until its hull has completely disappeared from view under the supposed curvature of the Earth, Then look through a telescope, you will notice the entire ship quickly zooms back into view, hull and all, proving that the disappearance was caused by the law of perspective, Not by a wall of curved water. This also proves that the horizon is simply the vanishing line of perspective from your point of view, not the alleged curvature of the Earth. 140.
Foucault's pendulums are often quoted as proof of a rotating Earth, but upon closer investigation proved the opposite. To begin with, Foucault's pendulums do not uniformly swing in any one direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes counterclockwise. Sometimes they fail to rotate, and sometimes they rotate far too much. The behavior of the pendulum actually depends on, 1, the initial force beginning its swing, and 2, the ball and socket joint, which most readily facilitates circular motion over any other.
The supposed rotation of the Earth is completely sequential and irrelevant to the pendulum swing. If the alleged constant rotation of the earth affected pendulums in any way, then there should be no need to manually start pendulums in motion. If the earth's diurnal rotation caused a three sixty degree uniform diurnal rotation of pendulums, then there should not exist a stationary pendulum anywhere on Earth. 141. The Coriolis effect is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the northern hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the southern hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball Earth.
Once again, however, just like Foucault's pendulum spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the northern and southern hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction. Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water's entry, Not the supposed rotation of the Earth. 142. People claim that if the Earth were flat, they should be able to use a telescope and see clear across the oceans. This is absurd, however, as the air is full of precipitation, especially over the oceans, and especially at the lowest, densest layer of atmosphere, dear, is not transparent.
Picture the blurry haze over roads on hot humid days. Even the best telescope will blur out long before you could see across an ocean. You can, however, use a telescope to zoom in much more of our flat Earth than would be possible on a ball 25,000 miles in circumference. 143. People claim that if the earth were flat, with the sun circling over and around us, we should be able to see the sun from everywhere all over the earth, and there should be daylight Even at nighttime.
Since the sun is not 93,000,000 miles away, but rather just a few 1,000, and shining down like a spotlight, Once it has moved significantly far enough away from your location, it becomes invisible beyond the horizon, and daylight slowly fades until it completely disappears. If the sun were 93,000,000 miles away and the Earth a spinning ball, the transition from daylight to night would instead be almost instantaneous as you pass the terminator line. 144. Pictures of the Moon appearing upside down in the southern hemisphere and right side up in the north are often cited as proof of the ball Earth, But once again, upon closer inspection, provide another proof of the flat model. In fact, time lapse photography shows the Moon itself turns clockwise like a wheel As it circles over and around the earth, you can find pictures of the moon at 360 degrees of various inclination from all over the earth Simply depending on where and when the picture was taken.
145. Heliocentrists believe the moon is a ball, Even though its appearance is clearly that of a flat luminous disk, we only ever see the same one face, albeit at various inclinations, of the moon. Yet it is claimed that there is another dark side of the moon which remains hidden. NASA states the moon spins opposite the spin of the earth In such a perfectly synchronized way that the motions cancel each other out, so we will conveniently never be able to observe the supposed dark side of The moon outside of their terrible, fake CGI images. Fact of the matter is, however, if the moon were a sphere, observers in Antarctica would see a different face from those at the equator, Yet they do not.
Just the same flat face rotated at various degrees. 146. The ball earth model claims the Moon orbits around the Earth once every 28 days, yet it is plain for anyone to see that the Moon orbits around the Earth every single day. The Moon's orbit is slightly slower than the Sun's but follows the Sun's same path from tropic to tropic, solstice to solstice, making a full circle over the Earth in just under 25 hours. 147.
The ball earth model claims the sun is precisely 400 times larger than the moon and 400 times further away from Earth, Making them falsely appear exactly the same size. Once again, the ball model asks us to accept as coincidence something that cannot be explained other than by natural design. The sun and moon occupy the same amount of space in the sky and have been measured with sextants to be of equal size and equal distance, so claiming otherwise is against our eyes, Experience, experiments, and common sense. 148. Quoting Earth Not a Globe by Samuel Rowbotham.
It is found by observation that the stars come to the meridian about 4 minutes earlier every 24 hours than the sun, taking the solar time as Standard. This makes 120 minutes every 30 days and 24 hours in the year, hence all the constellations have passed before or in advance of the sun at that time. This is the simple fact as observed in nature, but the theory of rotundity in motion on axes and in an orbit has no place for it. Visible truth must be ignored because this theory stands in the way and prevents its votaries from understanding it. 149.
Throughout 1000 of years, the same constellations have remained fixed in their same patterns without moving out of position whatsoever. If the Earth were a big ball spinning around a bigger sun spinning around a bigger galaxy shooting off from the biggest bang as NASA claims, It is impossible that the constellations would remain so fixed. Based on their model, we should, in fact, have an entirely different night sky every single night And never repeat exactly the same star pattern twice. 150. If Earth were a spinning ball, it would be impossible to photograph star trail time lapses Turning perfect circles around Polaris anywhere but the North Pole.
At all other vantage points, the stars would be seen to travel more or less Horizontally across the observer's horizon due to the alleged 1,000 mile per hour motion beneath their feet. In reality, however, Polaris's surrounding stars can always be photographed turning perfect circles around the central star all the way down to the Tropic of Capricorn. 151. If Earth were a spinning ball revolving around the sun, it would actually be impossible for star trail photos to show perfect circles even at the North Pole, Since the Earth is also allegedly moving 67,000 miles per hour around the sun, the sun moving 500,000 miles per hour around the Milky Way, In the entire galaxy going 67,000,000 miles per hour, these 4 contradictory motions would make star trail time lapses all show irregular curved lines. 152.
In 2003, 3 university geography professors collaborated in an experiment to prove The state of Kansas is indeed actually flatter than a pancake. Using topographical geodetic surveys covering over 80,000 square miles, It was determined that Kansas has a flatness ratio of 0.9997 over the entire state, while the average pancake, precisely measured using a confocal laser microscope, comes in at 0.957, making Kansas thereby literally flatter than a pancake. 153. Quoting Reverend Thomas Milner's Atlas of Physical Geography, we find that vast areas exhibit a perfectly dead level, Scarcely arise existing through 1500 miles from the Carpathians to the Urals. South of the Baltic, The country is so flat that a prevailing north wind will drive the waters of the statoner half into the mouth of the odor and give the river a backwards flow 30 or 40 miles.
The plains of Venezuela and New Granada in South America, chiefly on the left of the Orinoco, are termed elanos or level fields. Often, in the space of 270 square miles, the surface does not vary a single foot. The Amazon only falls Twelve feet in the last 700 miles of its course. The La Plata has only a descent of 1 33rd of an inch per mile. 154.
The Felix Baumgartner Red Bull dive outside camera shows the same amount of curvature of earth from surface level to jump height, Proving it to be a deceiving fish eyed wide angle lens, while the inside regular camera shows a perfectly flat horizon eye level at 128,000 feet, which is only consistent with a flat plane. 155. Some people claim to have seen the curvature of the earth out their airplane windows. The glass used in all commercial airplanes, however, is curved to remain flush with the fuselage. This creates a slight effect mixed with the confirmation bias people mistake for being the alleged Curvature of the Earth.
In actuality, the fact that you see the horizon at eye level, at 35,000 feet out both port and starboard windows, proves the Earth is flat. If the earth were a ball, no matter how big, the horizon would stay exactly where it was, and you would have to look down further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet, you should see nothing but outer space from the port and starboard windows, as the earth and horizon are supposed to be below you. If they are visible at eye level outside both windows, it's because the earth is flat. 156.
People also claim to see curvature in GoPro or other high altitude camera footage of the horizon. While it is true that the horizon often appears convex in such footage, It just as often appears concave or flat depending on the tilt and movement of the camera. The effect is simply a distortion due to wide angle lenses. In lens corrected and footage taken without wide angle technology, all amateur, high altitude horizon shots appear perfectly flat. 157.
If gravity magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball earth, that would mean the atmosphere near the equator would be spinning at over 1,000 miles per hour. The atmosphere over the mid latitudes would be spinning around 500 miles per hour and gradually slower to the poles, where the atmosphere would be unaffected at 0 miles per hour. In reality, however, the atmosphere at every point on earth is equally unaffected by this alleged force, as it has never been measured or calculated and proven nonexistent By the ability of airplanes to fly unabated in any direction without experiencing any such atmospheric changes. 158. If gravity magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball earth, that would mean the higher the altitude, the faster the spinning atmosphere would have to be turning around the center of rotation.
In reality, however, if this were happening, then rain and fireworks would behave entirely differently as they fell down through progressively slower and slower spinning atmosphere. Hot air balloons would also be forced steadily faster eastwards as they ascended through the ever increasing atmospheric speeds. 159. If there were progressively faster and faster spinning atmosphere the higher the altitude, that would mean it would have to abruptly end at some key altitude where the fastest layer of gravitized Spinning atmosphere meets the supposed nongravitized, nonspinning, non atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. NASA has never even mentioned what altitude this impossible feat allegedly happens, but it is easily philosophically refuted By the simple fact that vacuums cannot exist connected to non vacuums while maintaining the properties of a vacuum.
Not to mention, the effect such a transition would have on a rocket Spaceship would be disastrous. 160. It is impossible for rockets or any type of jet propulsion engines to work in the alleged non Atmosphere of vacuum space. Because without air or atmosphere to push against, there is nothing to propel the vehicle forwards. Instead, the rockets Shuttles would be sent spinning around their own axis uncontrollably in all directions like a gyroscope.
It would be impossible to fly to the moon or go in any direction whatsoever, Especially if gravity were real and constantly sucking you towards the closest, densest body. 161. If Earth were really a ball, there would be no reason to use rockets for flying into outer space anyway, because simply flying an airplane Straight at any altitude for long enough should and would send you off into outer space. To prevent their airplanes from flying tangent to the ball Earth, pilots would have to constantly course correct downwards, or else within just a few hours, the average commercial airliner traveling 500 miles per hour would find themselves lost in outer space. The fact that this never happens, artificial horizons remain level at pilots' desired altitudes and do not require constant downward adjustments, proves the Earth is not a ball.
162. All NASA and other space agencies' rocket launches never go straight up. Every rocket forms a parabolic curve, peeks out, and inevitably starts falling back to earth. The rockets which are declared successful are those few which don't Bloat or start falling too soon, but make it out of range of the spectator view before crashing down into restricted waters and recovered. There is no magic altitude where rockets or anything else can simply go up up up and then suddenly just start free floating in space.
This is all a science fiction illusion created by wires, green screens, dark pools, some permed hair, and 0 g planes. 163. NASA and other space agencies have been caught time and again with air bubbles forming and floating off in their official outer space footage. Astronauts have also been caught using scuba space gear, kicking their legs to move, and astronaut Luca Parmitano even almost drowned when water started filling up his helmet while allegedly on a spacewalk. It is admitted that astronauts train for their spacewalks in underwater training facilities like NASA's Neutral Buoyancy Lab.
But what is obvious from their space bubbles and other blunders is that all official spacewalk footage is also fake and filmed underwater. 164. Analysis of many interior videos from the International Space Station have shown the use of camera tricks Such as green screens, harnesses, and even wildly permed hair to achieve a zero gravity type effect. Footage of the astronauts Seemingly floating in the zero gravity of their space station is indistinguishable from vomit comet 0 g airplane footage. By flying parabolic maneuvers, this 0 g floating effect can be achieved over and over again, then edited together.
For longer uncut shots, NASA has been caught using simple wires and green screen technology. 165. NASA claims one can observe the International Space Station pass by overhead proving its existence, yet analysis of the ISS seen through zoom cameras Proves it to be some type of hologram or drone, not a physical floating space base. As you can see in my documentary ISS Hoax, When zooming in and out, the ISS dramatically and impossibly changes shape and color, displaying a prismatic rainbow effect until coming into focus much like an old 166. The geostationary communications satellite was first created by Freemason science fiction writer Arthur c Clark, and supposedly became science fact just a decade later.
Before this, radio, television, and navigation systems like Lorenz and DeCA were Already well established and worked fine using only ground based technologies. Nowadays huge fiber optic cables connect the Internet across oceans, Gigantic cell towers triangulate GPS signals, and ionospheric propagation allows radio waves to be bounced all without the aid of the science fiction bestseller known as Satellites, 167. Satellites are allegedly floating around in the thermosphere where temperatures are claimed to be upwards of 4,530 degrees Fahrenheit. The metals used in satellites, however, such as aluminum, gold, and titanium, have melting points of 1221, 1948, and 3,034 degrees, respectively, All far lower than they could possibly handle. 168.
So called satellite phones have been found to have reception problems Problems in countries like Kazakhstan with very few cell phone towers. If the Earth were a ball with 20,000 plus satellites surrounding, Such blackouts should not regularly occur in any rural countryside areas. 169. So called satellite TV dishes are almost always positioned at a 45 degree angle towards the nearest ground based repeater tower. If TV antenna were actually picking up 1.
The fact that Satellite dishes are never pointing straight up and almost always positioned at a 45 degree angle proves they are picking up ground based Hour signals and not outer space satellites. 170. People even claim to see satellites with their naked eyes, But this is ridiculous considering they are smaller than a bus and allegedly a 100 plus miles away. It is impossible to see anything so small that far away. Even using telescopes, no one claims to discern the shape of satellites but rather describes seeing passing moving lights, which could easily be any number of things, From airplanes to drones to shooting stars or other unidentified flying objects.
171. NASA claims there are upwards of 20,000 satellites Eric all of which are clearly CGI and not photographs. If Earth were truly a ball with 20,000 satellites orbiting, It would be a simple matter to mount a camera and take some real photographs. The fact that no real satellite photographs of the supposed ball Earth exist in favor of NASA's Ribbons of composite CG imagery is further proof that we are not being told the truth. 172.
If you pick any cloud in the sky and watch for several minutes, 2 things will happen. The clouds will move, and they will morph, gradually changing shape. In official NASA footage of the spinning ball Earth, such as the Galileo time lapse video, however, clouds are constantly shown for 24 plus hours at a Time and not moving or morphing whatsoever. This is completely impossible, further proof that NASA produces fake CGI videos And further evidence that Earth is not a spinning ball. 173.
NASA has several alleged photographs of the ball Earth, which Show several exact duplicate cloud patterns. The likelihood of having 2 or 3 clouds of the exact same shape in the same picture is as likely as finding 2 or 3 people the exact same fingerprints. In fact, it is a solid proof that the clouds were copied and pasted in a computer program, and that such pictures showing a ball shaped Earth are fakes. 174. NASA graphics artists have placed things like faces, dragons, and even the word sex Into cloud patterns over their various ball earth pictures.
Their recent 2015 Pluto pictures even clearly have a picture of Disney's Pluto the dog layered into the background. Such blatant fraud goes unnoticed by the hypnotized masses, but provides further proof of the illegitimacy if NASA and their spinning ball planet, Mythos. 175. Professional photoanalysts have dissected several NASA images of the ball Earth and found undeniable proof of computer editing. For example, images of the earth allegedly taken from the moon have proven to be copied and pasted in, as evidenced by rectangular cuts found in the black background around the earth By adjusting brightness and contrast levels.
If they were truly on the moon and Earth was truly a ball, there would be no need to fake such pictures. 176. When NASA's images of the ball earth are compared with one another, the coloration of the land and oceans and relative size of the continents Are consistently so drastically different from one another as to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the pictures are all fake. 177. In the documentary A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, we can watch official leaked NASA footage showing Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, and Michael Collins for almost an hour using transparencies and camera tricks to fake shots of a round Earth.
They communicate over audio with control in Houston about how to accurately stage the shot, and someone keeps prompting them on how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired effect. First, they blacked out all the windows except for a downward facing circular one, which they aimed the camera towards from several feet away. This created the illusion of a ball shaped earth Surrounded by the blackness of space, when in fact it was simply a round window in their dark cabin. Neil Armstrong claimed at this point to be 130,000 miles from the Earth, halfway to the Moon. But when camera tricks were finished, the viewer could see for themselves the astronauts we're not more than a couple dozen miles above the Earth's surface, likely flying in a high altitude plane.
178. People claim Google Earth somehow proves the ball model without realizing that Google Earth is simply a composite program of images taken from high altitude planes and street level car cameras Superimposed onto a CGI model of a ball Earth, the same could just as easily be molded onto a square Earth or any other shape, and therefore cannot be used as proof Earth's Rotundity. 179. If the Earth were constantly spinning eastward a 1000 miles per hour, then airplane flight durations going eastward versus westwards should be significantly different. If the average commercial airliner travels 500 miles per hour, it follows that westbound equatorial flights should reach their destination at approximately Twice the speed as their eastbound return flights.
In reality, however, the differences in east and westbound flight durations usually amount to a matter of minutes And nothing near what would occur on a 1,000 mile per hour spinning ball Earth. 180. The spinning ball model dictates that the Earth It would be moving together at approximately 500 miles per hour at the mid latitudes where LA to New York City flights take place. The average commercial airliner traveling 500 miles per hour takes 5 and a half hours traveling east with the alleged rotation of the Earth, so the return flight west should take only 2.75 hours, but in fact we find that the average New York to LA flight takes 6 hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. One hundred and eighty one.
Flights eastwards with the alleged spin of the ball earth from Tokyo to LA take an average of 10 and a half hours. Therefore, the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 5 and a quarter hours, but in actual fact, Take an average of 11 and a half hours, another flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. 182. Flights eastward With the alleged spin of the ball earth from New York to London, take an average of 7 hours. Therefore, the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of 3 and a half but in actual fact, take an average of 7 and a half hours, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model.
183. Flights eastward from Chicago to Boston with the alleged spin of the ball earth take an average of 2 and a quarter hours. Therefore, the return flights westwards against the alleged spin should take an average of just over an hour, but in actual fact, take an average of 2 3 quarters hours, Once again, completely inconsistent with the spinning ball model. 184. Flights eastward from Paris to Rome with the alleged Spin of the ball earth take an average of 2 hours.
Therefore, the return flights westward against the alleged spin should take an average of 1 hour, By an actual fact, have an average flight duration of 2 hours and 10 minutes, a flight time totally inconsistent with the spinning ball model. 185. We are told that the earth and atmosphere spin together at such a perfect uniform velocity that no one in history has ever seen, heard, Acceleration. In reality, however, even with eyes closed, windows up, over smooth tar in a luxury car at a mere uniform, Fifty miles per hour. The movement absolutely can be felt.
At 20 times this speed, earth's imaginary 1,000 mile per hour spin would most certainly be noticeable, felt, Seen and heard by all. 186. People sensitive to motion sickness feel distinct unease and physical discomfort from motion essay as an Car and their stomach starts turning knots. The idea that motion sickness is nowhere apparent in anyone at 1,000 miles per hour but suddenly comes about at 10 50 miles per hour is ridiculous and proves the earth is not in motion whatsoever. 187.
The second law of thermodynamics, Otherwise known as the law of entropy, along with the fundamental principles of friction and resistance, determine the impossibility of earth being a uniformly spinning ball. Over time, the spinning ball earth would experience measurable amounts of drag, constantly slowing the spin and lengthening the amount of hours per day, As not the slightest such change has ever been observed in all of recorded history, it is absurd to assume the Earth has ever moved an inch. 188. Over the years, NASA has twice changed their story regarding the shape of the Earth. At first, they maintained Earth was A perfect sphere, which later changed to an oblate spheroid flattened at the poles and then changed again to being pear shaped As the southern hemisphere allegedly bulges out as well.
Unfortunately for NASA, however, none of their official pictures show an oblate spheroid or pear shaped Earth. All their pictures, contrary to their words, show a spherical and clearly CGI fake earth. 189. The Bible, Quran, Srimad Bhagavatam, and many other holy books describe and purport the existence of a geocentric, stationary flat earth. For example, 1 Chronicles 1630 and Psalm 9610 both read, he has fixed the earth firm, immovable, and Psalm 9031 says, The world also established that it cannot be moved.
The Bible also repeatedly affirms that the earth is outstretched as a plane, With the outstretched heavens everywhere above, not all around, giving a scriptural proof the earth is not a spinning ball. 190. Cultures the world over throughout history have all described and purported the existence of a geocentric, stationary flat earth. Egyptians, Indians, Mayans, Chinese, Native Americans, And literally every ancient civilization on earth had a geocentric flat earth cosmology. Before Pythagoras, the idea of a spinning ball earth was nonexistent, And even after Pythagoras, it remained an obscure minority view until 2000 years later when Copernicus began reviving the heliocentric theory.
191. From Pythagoras to Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton to modern astronauts like Aldrin Armstrong and Collins to director of NASA and grand commander of the 33rd degree, C. Fred Klinkencht, the founding fathers of the spinning ball mythos have all been Freemasons. The fact that so many members of this, the largest and oldest secret society in existence, have all been coconspirators bringing about this literal planetary revolution is beyond the possibility of coincidence and provides proof of organized collusion in creating and maintaining this multigenerational deception. 192.
Quoting terra firma by David Wardlaw Scott. The system of the universe, as taught by modern astronomers, being Founded entirely on theory, for the truth of which they are unable to advance 1 single real proof, they have entrenched themselves in a conspiracy of silence and decline to answer any objections which may be made to their hypothesis. Copernicus himself, who revived the theory the heathen philosopher, Pythagoras, and his great exponent, sir Isaac Newton, confessed that their system of a revolving earth was only a possibility And could not be proved by facts. It is only their followers who have decorated it with the name of an exact science, yea, according to them, The most exact of all the sciences. Yet 1 astronomer, Royal for England, once said, speaking of the motion of the whole solar system, The matter is left in a most delightful state of uncertainty, and I shall be very glad if anyone can help me out of it.
What a very sad position for an exact To science to be in is this. 193. No child or un indoctrinated man in their right mind would ever Conclude or even conceive, given to their own devices based on their own personal observations, that the Earth was a spinning ball revolving around the sun. Such imaginative theories, nowhere present in anyone's daily experience, require and have required massive amounts of constant propaganda to uphold the illusion. 194.
From David Ward, Last God. I remember being taught, when a boy, that the earth was a great ball revolving at a very rapid rate around the sun, and when I expressed to my teacher my fears that the waters of the oceans would tumble off, I was told that they were prevented from doing so by Newton's great law of gravitation, Which kept everything in its proper place. I presume that my countenance must have shown some signs of incredulity, for my teacher immediately added, I can show you a direct proof of this. A man can whirl around his head a pail filled with water without it being spilt, and so, in like manner, can the oceans be carried around the sun without losing a drop. As this illustration was evidently intended to settle the matter, I then said no more upon the subject.
Had such been proposed to me afterwards, as a man, would have answered somewhat as follows: Sir, I beg to say that the illustration you have given of a man whirling a pail of water around his head And the oceans revolving around the sun does not in any degree confirm your argument, because the water in the 2 cases is placed under entirely different circumstances, But to be of any value, the conditions in each case must be the same, which here they are not. The pail is a hollow vessel Which holds the water inside it, whereas according to your teaching, the earth is a ball with a continuous curvature outside, which, in agreement with the laws of nature, not retain any water. 195. Astronomers say the magical magnetism of gravity is what keeps the oceans of the world stuck to the ball Earth. They claim that because the Earth is so massive, by virtue of this mass, it creates a magic force able to hold people, oceans, and atmosphere tightly clung to the underside of the spinning ball.
Unfortunately, however, they cannot provide any practical example of this on a scale smaller than the planetary. A spinning wet tennis ball, for instance, has the exact opposite effect of the OZ at Ball Earth. Any water poured over it simply falls off the sides, and giving it a spin results in water flying off 360 degrees like a dog Astronomers concede the wet tennis ball example displays the opposite effect of their supposed ball earth, but claim that at some unknown mass, The magic adhesive properties of gravity suddenly kick in, allowing the spinning wet tennis ball earth to keep every drop of gravitized water stuck to the surface. When such an unproven theory goes against all experiments, experience, and common sense, it is high time to drop the theory. 196.
Quoting Martial Hall. In short, the sun, moon, and stars are actually doing precisely what everyone Throughout all of history has seen them do. We do not believe what our eyes tell us because we've been taught a counterfeit system which demands that we believe what has never been confirmed by observation or experiment. That counterfeit system demands that the earth rotate on an axis every 24 hours at a speed of over a 1000 miles per hour at the equator. No one has ever, ever, ever seen or felt such movement, nor seen or felt the 67,000 mile per hour speed of Earth's alleged orbit around the sun, Or its 500,000 mile per hour alleged speed around a galaxy, or its retreat from an alleged Big Bang at over 67,000,000 miles per hour.
Remember, No experiment has ever shown the earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact must Decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in World War two Down a chimney from 25,000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed would have been impossible if calculated on an earth moving below at several 100 miles per hour and constantly changing with the latitude. 197. Some people claim there is no motive for such a grand scale deception, and that flatter ball makes no difference. By removing Earth from the motionless center of the universe, These Masons have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference.
If the earth is the center of the universe, then the ideas of God, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent. But if the earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars and billions of galaxies, and the ideas of God, creation, and a specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible. By surreptitiously indoctrinating us into their scientific materialist sun worship, not only do we lose faith in anything beyond the material, We gain absolute faith in materiality, superficiality, status, selfishness, hedonism, and consumerism. If there's no God and everyone's just an Then all that really matters is me, me, me. They've turned Madonna, the mother of god, into a material girl living in a material world.
The rich powerful corporations with slick sun cult logos sell us idols to worship, slowly taking over the world while we tacitly believe their science, Vote for their politicians, buy their products, listen to their music, and watch their movies, sacrificing our souls at the altar of materialism. To quote Morris Klein, the heliocentric theory, by putting the sun at the center of the universe, made man appear to be just one of a possible A host of wanderers drifting through a cold sky, it seemed less likely that he was born to live gloriously and to attain Paradise upon his death. Less likely, 2, was it that he was the object of God's ministrations. 198. Some say that the idea of an intergenerational worldwide conspiracy conspiracy to delude the masses sounds implausible or unrealistic.
But these people need only familiarize themselves with the works and writings of Freemasons themselves, For example, John Robison, who exposed this in his 17/98 book, proofs of a conspiracy against all the religions and governments of Europe Carried out in the secret meetings of the Freemasons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies. Supreme commander of the 33rd degree Albert Pike Was quite forthcoming in several letters regarding the Masons' ultimate goal of world domination and the Zionist protocols of the learned Elders of Zion, the exact plan by which this Would be and has been carried out is completely disclosed. 199. From Foundations of Many Generations by E. Yasuni.
The only thing the fable of the revolving earth has done, it has shown the terrible power of a lie. A lie has the power to make a man a mental slave So that he dares not back the evidence of his own senses, to deny the plain and obvious movement of the sun he sees before him, When he feels himself standing on an earth utterly devoid of motion, at the suggestion of someone else, he's prepared to accept that he's spinning furiously around. When he sees a bird flying and gaining over the ground, he's prepared to believe that the ground is really traveling a great number of times faster than the bird. Finally, in order to uphold the imagination of a madman, he is prepared to accuse his maker of forming for him a censiferous lie. 200.
Finally, from doctor Robotham. Thus we see that this Newtonian philosophy is devoid of consistency. Its details are the result of an entire violation of the laws of legitimate reasoning, and all its premises are assumed. It is, in fact, nothing more than an assumption upon assumption, and the conclusions derived therefrom willfully considered as things proved and to be employed as truths to substantiate the first and fundamental assumptions. Such a juggle and jumble of fancies and falsehoods, Extended and intensified as in theoretical astronomy is calculated to make the unprejudiced inquirer revolt With horror from the terrible conjuration which has been practiced upon him, to sternly resolve to resist its further progress, To endeavor to overthrow the entire edifice and to bury in its ruins the false honors which have been associated with its fabricators and which still attach to its devotees.
For the learning, the patience, the perseverance, and devotion for which they have ever been examples, honor and applause need not be withheld, But their false reasoning, the advantages they have taken of the general ignorance of mankind in respect to astronomical subjects and the unfounded theories they have advanced For more information about our flat earth, read The Flat Earth Conspiracy by Eric Dube and visit atlanteanconspiracy.com in ifers. Boards.net
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Original video without music or commentary from the triggered “men” https://t.co/exXo5c2H6n
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, an 8-year-old explains the concept of flat earth. They argue that gravity is a theory, not a fact, and that density and electromagnetic frequency (EMF) are responsible for objects falling, not gravity. They demonstrate this with two cups of water and an egg. They also claim that since water stays level and the Earth is 70% water, 70% of the Earth must be flat. They dismiss the idea of space and argue that if the Earth were round, people and boats wouldn't be able to stay upright. They believe in a flat Earth surrounded by a firmament, which they compare to air pressure in a tire. They also discuss the sun, moon, and seasons, using Capuscular rays as evidence for a local sun. They claim that the moon has its own light, which they tested with a laser thermometer. The video concludes with a reminder that the truth should not be afraid of investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm 8 years old and I'm going to be teaching you about flat earth. So first we're going to start off with gravity. Gravity is a theory not a fact. Mastertracting masks never been proven properly. This happened in 16/66.
An apple fell on Isaac Macon's head. It must have been a big apple for him to believe in gravity. Gravity is fake because density and EMF are making things drop. Not gravity. There is iodine salt in this cup and no iodine salt in the other cup.
There is 2 cups of water with an egg. 1 with iodine salt but with no iodine salt. This one has iodine salt and it has Electricity, because electricity is pushing the egg up. And the other one has no electricity in it because the egg is denser than the water. Density and surrounding medium with EMF that stands for electromagnetic frequency.
If gravity can't be proven and earth is 70% water, we know water stays level, Then 70% of earth is level. Now we are going to move on to the globe and our flat earth. So say there's a boat just cruising on the bottom of the earth. It would fall into space and space is fake. If space was real, stars would have parallax but they don't.
So just 1 space and this is for anything that can't go upside down. If people believe that the earth is round, people don't walk upside down. Same with a boat. It doesn't sail upside down. Do you think this is true or not?
Well no, it is not. This is our true flat earth And the thing around it is the firmament. I'm going to tell you how the firmament is real. The firmament is real because air pressure has to be contained. Just like in a tire.
Now we are going to move on to seasons and the sun. The spinning fall globe believers say that the sun is 93,000,000 miles away. The globe depends on parallel rays for the seasons. All you have to do is use your God given eyes to see. We have Capuscular rays from the sun.
Capuscular rays prove we have a local sun. That proves Everything about seasons and the sun. Now we are going to move on to a sun, moon and earth depiction. The sun is shining on the moon and the moon is shining on the earth. Why is it not shining its temperature on earth?
Well me and my dad did an experiment 1 night on a full moon and we used a laser thermometer to check the Moon's light and its shadow. The moon's light was colder than its shadow. So that proves the light It's colder than its shadow and proves that the moon has its own light. The sun is not Collecting its light on the moon. The moon has its own light.
Thank you for watching my fabulous presentation. I hope you guys liked it. And Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. Just remember, The truth does not fear investigation. Thank you for watching.
Bye.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Global Vision Bible Church and Locke Media have decided to remove the Flat Earth Debate event from all platform archives due to the disruptive behavior of Odle and his flat-earth supporters. Despite the security team's efforts, the debate never took place. Odle's supporters erupted in anger, with some even resorting to violence. The Bible never claims that the earth is flat, and the event will not be promoted to avoid endorsing deceptive fairy tales and conspiracy theories.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Flat Earth Debate - Official Press Statement “…Locke eventually decided he had seen enough and told Odle to leave. When Odle responded by throwing his microphone at Locke, it was clear that he had gotten exactly what he came for. The Global Vision Bible Church security team did an admirable job of keeping the peace while Odle's flat-earth supporters errupted with anger and took over the floor. Several of Odle's supporters had to be restrained for rushing toward Locke while yelling profanities, and many more screamed and raged at the small number of Global Vision members in attendance. The visitors continued raging in the parking lot as some defiantly smoked marijuana in the parking lot. One enraged visitor rammed three cars as he sped away, further necessitating police involvement. Sadly, despite four very difficult hours, the actual debate never happened. For this and for the bad-faith behavior of Odle and his flat-earth supporters, Global Vision Bible Church and Locke Media have decided to remove the event from all platform archives. We will not help them promote their deceptive fairy tales and conspiracy theories, as we consider them to be doctrines of demons. The truth is clear. The Bible never claims that the earth is flat.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various names and topics, including Angela, Anton, Andriy, queues, pensions, oil, euros, and trading. They mention a master, a resident, a chief, and the installation of grass. The conversation repeats certain phrases multiple times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Чен пенсії ангел олії антон антон антон анґела чен андрій ангеліна черги анґела олії євро
Speaker 1: щепили андрій 68
Speaker 0: зовні рот чен майстер чен жителька прийшов майстер розташоване піп пі чен пенсії ангел олії антон
Speaker 1: антон антон
Speaker 0: анґела чен андрій ангеліна черги
Speaker 1: анґела олії євро щепили андрій 68
Speaker 0: зовні рот чен майстер чен жителька прийшов майстер розташоване піп пі шин начальниця андрій роман трава встановили трава встановили трава встановили черги черги черги черги черги черги черги трава черги трава черги трава черги трава черги черги черги черги черги жінки трава торги торги торги шин начальниця андрій роман трава встановили трава встановили трава встановили черги черги черги черги черги черги черги трава черги трава черги трава черги трава черги черги черги черги черги жінки трава торги торги торги шин начальниця андрій роман трава встановили трава встановили трава встановили черги черги черги черги черги черги черги трава черги трава черги трава черги трава черги черги черги черги черги жінки трава торги торги торги
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
#FlatEarth pastor full 1 hour 40 minute opening presentation 😎 https://t.co/lrWSMa1i2I
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker passionately argues for a flat, non-rotating, geocentric Earth, emphasizing the importance of interpreting biblical passages literally. They present various scriptures and claim that all scripture is profitable for doctrine, while also discussing the symbolic language used in the Bible. The speaker believes there is a plot to deceive people about the true nature of creation, attributing it to Satan. They assert that accepting the mainstream scientific view of a spherical Earth goes against the Bible and leads people away from God. Testimonies of atheists turned believers after examining evidence for a flat Earth are shared, along with questioning the credibility of NASA and presenting arguments against mainstream scientific explanations. The speaker also discusses experiments, evidence from the Bible, and references the firmament as a solid structure supporting water above it. They argue that the Earth is stationary and at rest, contradicting the idea of a spinning, flying, and wobbling planet. The Michelson Morley experiment and government documents are referenced to support their claims. Pastor Dean further explores the movement of the sun, aligning it with a stationary Earth based on biblical descriptions and citing a document from a Russian scientist. Various Bible verses suggesting a flat Earth shaped like clay under a seal are presented. The video concludes by mentioning interviews with astronauts who claim the Earth is flat and asserting the word of God as the ultimate authority on the matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Possible. What's that? Pray. Pray. Let's pray.
I agree with that. Father in heaven, we come to you today, and we just thank you for this time, and we thank you for this opportunity. We just open, lord, just pray you just open hearts and minds right now to hear your word for what it says, it's not metaphors and, similes and illustrations that, Lord, your word, you said exactly what you meant about how the earth is and how your universe is, and we believe that, God, and we thank you for it, and we just pray for your peace and your truth right now to go forth in Jesus' name. Amen. Now let me just go ahead and state this out front.
When it comes to the Bible, it's without question a flat, non rotating, geocentric earth. That's just the way it is. The only way the other side gets to make it a spinning flying sphere is that they have to say, oh, those passages is about the pillars of the earth and the foundation of the earth and the earth doesn't move, that that is just, metaphors. That's just poetry. But folks, I'm gonna read this scripture here.
We're gonna read a few scriptures first to start off with. And this is second Peter 1 16 through twenty. You guys can put it on the screen for everybody. Let's read this. He says, for we have not followed cunningly devised fables when made known unto you the power and coming of our lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
For he received from god the father honor and glory when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory. This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased. And this voice which came from heaven we heard when we were with him in the Holy Mount. Have also a more sure word of prophecy whereunto you do well that you take heed as unto a light that shineth in a dark place until the day dawn and the day star arise in your hearts, knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Now here's the other scripture we're gonna go through. All scripture, the 2nd Timothy 3 16, all scripture, even the parts that they wanna call metaphors and poetry, and I think pastor Greg called 1. He said hyperbole, but hyperbole means exaggeration and lies, and god doesn't do that. The bible doesn't use those things. God means what he says.
Now there's few there's symbolic language. I'll say, like, for instance, let's let's talk about a symbolic language. The bible talks about a 7 head, 10 horned beast in the book of Revelation and in Daniel. Right? But that 7 head, 10 horned beast, find out it's a literal thing.
It's gonna be a world government. In fact, the United Nations has already become that, a 7 head, 10 horned beast. You have the 5 on the permanent council. You have the p five plus one, which is Germany, week 6, and then the EU head comes in when they have a serious problem like the the Iranian nuclear deal. So you have 7 heads, and then under that, you have 10 rotating positions.
So literally, the UN that's going to end up being a world government has already 7 heads and 10 horns. So even though there's symbolic language at times in the bible, it's talking about something that's real. Okay? And that was what we need to agree on. But all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine.
So the moment somebody says, well, the what what the bible says in the book of Job or whatever about creation doesn't matter, know it matters because it's profitable for doctrine. Right? See, the thing about it is I'm not gonna have to do theological jumping jacks to agree with the secular system about how creation is, I can just stick with the word of god. Alright? Now when he says here, all scriptures given by inspiration of god and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of god may be perfect, thoroughly furnished under all good works.
This one right here, Revelation 129, and the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent called the devil and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world, he was cast into the earth and his angels were cast out with him. Now we are told, this is the book of Revelation chapter 12 that that Satan would deceive the whole world. How is it that we think that Satan, who is invisible, who has power, who actually has people who serve him in the government, in the militaries of the world, how is it that we think if we gave him $60,000,000 a day, which is NASA's budget, that he couldn't deceive the whole world with something. And we know from the bible that the number one way we know there's a creator and that leads us to a creator that says that we're without excuses, the creation. So if you were the devil and you wanted to lead people away from the bible and finding Jesus as their lord and savior, you would need to twist the creation story to make it completely wrong and get people to believe that your version of it is right and the Bibles is wrong.
Alright? But that's exactly what Satan has done. Now people, old Christians, when they come up, they ask, well, why does this matter? Well, we're gonna find out in just a second, but here's another verse. People don't wanna talk about conspiracy.
Look. There's conspiracy theories and then there's conspiracy facts. Lord, when they tell you, like, for instance, they're gonna make a vaccine well, Bill Gates said this in 2010. He said, when they say, oh, yeah. We're gonna lower the population of the world through new vaccines.
Now they just told you what they're gonna do. Most people can't even believe that, but it's already been happening. Now the Bible says there's gonna be a massive plot, a massive conspiracy against the god of the bible, his messiah, Jesus Christ. We read it right here. Psalm 2.
Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together against the soul together against the lord and against his anointed, saying, let us break their bands asunder and cast away their cords from us. He that sinneth in the heavens, though, shall laugh and shall have them in derision, then shall he speak unto them in his wrath and vex them in his sword displeasure. So he tells us here that the evil and this is the last day's context. He's gonna talk about the messiah coming and ruling with a rod of iron.
Jesus is gonna return and fix everything. Right? But he tells us that the kings of the earth are gonna take counsel, and, actually, the amplified says they're gonna bring together a plot. And, yes, so they're all in on it. Every lie that's out there, folks, whether it be about creation, I mean, or or whatever, every lie out there is to turn people away from the truth of god's word.
You understand? That's what that's what this is over. We can sit here and argue maps and models, and I have my military spirits and he has ears, we can argue this stuff all day long. But the bottom line is the fruit, the fruit of what's going on. And does the Bible say it?
But there is a plot. Now let me show you part of where that plot is. Let's go to Romans. Here we go to Romans. He says here this is Romans 118 to 20.
He says, for the wrath of god is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who hold the truth. Now this word in the Greek, hold, means to hold down, suppress, withhold. He says that there are men who withhold the truth because that which may be known of god is manifest in them. For god has showed it unto them, for the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and godhead so that they are without excuse. So he tells us here that part of the plot remember acts I mean, Psalm 2, we just read part of the plot.
Is this hiding the truth about creation, suppressing it? They know there's a firmament. They tried to blow it up in the 19 sixties with Operation Fishbowl. Glad it didn't work. Right?
Now let's keep going here. Oh,
Speaker 1: my bad. Wrong one. Here we go.
Speaker 0: Now, this is what pastor Greg said when his 1st rant here, he said, I don't care about biblical cosmology. There is no such thing. It's man made. A few minutes later, he said, I wanna be fair to that side because we've been lied to in a bunch of other areas. It does not mean we've been lied to about the shape and cosmology of the earth.
Well, is cosmology a thing or is it not a thing? I'm just wondering. But cosmology is simply the definition. Cosmology is the science of the universe. Cosmology is the study of the universe as a whole from its origin and, of course, they use the term evolution, though we don't believe in evolution, but they it's it's about the origin of the universe.
Alright. This is what it's about. Now the world system has their version of this. They believe in a big bang, that nothing exploded and created everything. Right?
Which that's that's to me is mind blowing how they believe this. But this is their thing is the next let me see. Did I do it right? That one right there. So their big thing.
Look at it. Look at it. 1,000,000,000 of years, these galaxies and stars and all this stuff, this is their version, but this is not God's version. Now let me ask you a question. We we would think it's ridiculous now.
Like modern science modern science says that we evolved from the primordial goo and these creatures came along, and then we finally became primates. And then we finally, after 1,000,000 and zillions of years, we we evolved from primates or monkeys. Now why as Christians do we not believe that? Number 1, there is no evidence. If there was 1,000,000 of years of this transitional phase, there would be skeletons and fossils of this transitional phase.
So number 1, there's no evidence that we can see, and the bible clearly teaches that we didn't come from monkeys over 1,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 years. Now we don't believe the scientists would get up here and tell you it's a fact that we came from monkeys, but we don't accept that. But then we're gonna accept their version. You say, well, I've heard people say, well, I believe in the big bang. God made a big bang, and that's the way it was.
No. No. He tells us exactly how he created the earth in Genesis, in Job, in Psalms. He tells us exactly how he did it. And it's important.
You say, well, why is it important? Well, let me show you something before we get to that. Let me show you what Neil deGrasse Tyson, one of our top astrophysicists, and Michio Kaku, tell us.
Speaker 2: Sciences. There is a crisis in cosmology. Usually, in science, if we're off by a factor of 2 or a factor of 10, we call that horrible. We say something's wrong with the theory. We're off by a factor of 10.
However, in cosmology, we're off by a factor of 10 to the 120. That is 1 with a 120 zeros after it. This is the largest mismatch Between theory and experiment in the history of science.
Speaker 3: Dark matter. I get asked what it is, and my best answer is we haven't a clue. We don't know what it is. We look out in the universe, and 85% of all the gravity that's out there has some mysterious unknown source. We add up all the stars, the galaxies, the planets, the comets, the black holes, the dark clouds, everything out there that we can see, touch, smell, or taste, And it doesn't add up to give us the gravity that we see operating in this universe.
So, really, we should be calling it The dark force. Because we don't know if it's made of matter. Like, it could be a profound misnomer sending people off in thought directions that might not really be, the right path. So dark matter is just simply what we call this thing about which we know nothing, Responsible for 85% of the gravity of the cosmos. We've known about dark matter since 19 thirties.
Back then, it was called missing mass. That's what it was called because, yeah, there's gotta be some mass. Where is it we can't find it? It's gotta be here somewhere because we got the gravity. If you have the gravity, you gotta have the mass.
Mass and gravity go together. It's really dark gravity. Actually, we shouldn't call it anything. We should call it Fred, something that has no meaning Because we don't know what it is to call it, but it has been a it is the longest standing unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.
Speaker 0: Now here's 2 of your top scientists in the world telling you that on cosmology, they're off by 10 with a 120 zeros beside it. Then they start telling you for our model to work, this all this gravity nonsense and spinning and flying things. They said, it's got to have a certain amount of gravity, but we don't know. It doesn't have that. Our what they're saying is that our whole system we built makes no sense to us.
It doesn't work. And I will tell you why they call it missing mass. The missing mass is called the fermi. You're gonna see that in a second. That's what they miscalculate.
But I wanna share you with you this here, and we're gonna skip ahead here. I'm gonna talk about this. This is what is called the Hebrew concept of the universe. This is what the will teach it. Alright?
And we'll get back to this in just a second, but it shows you that this is what the firmament is the dome structure over the flat, non rotating earth. Hell is beneath. Heaven is above that. God's throne sits on that. This is what the bible teaches.
There's all of the scriptures around that. We're get to that in a second. So more like that, not that. In fact, that sphere you're looking at there is, is a composite image. But here's what the Bible says.
The Bible describes a solid McDonne covered the flat earth on set on pillars on a foundation that God himself built. Nothing in the Bible describes the earth as a sphere. Alright. And I'm gonna show you that, and I'm gonna prove that. But many Christians ask why does it matter or just say the issue of the nature of creation doesn't matter.
I'm gonna tell you why it matters, and you're gonna see this. Now before we get to that, I want you to see Jesus said this. This is Matthew 24. This is Jesus talking. These are in your red letters here.
Jesus said that immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be dark and the moon shall not give her light. The stars shall fall from heaven. He didn't say meteorites, comets. He said the stars. It's the same word he used throughout the bible for the stars.
Now either they're stars or they're not stars. Now the heliocentric Copernican model that you guys some of you wanna believe in, says that the stars out there are bigger are are massive, bigger than the earth. They're they're huge things that if one fell to the earth, it would swallow the earth. So Jesus did not teach a Copernican cosmology. He taught a biblical cosmology and that the stars are smaller, closer, and are gonna fall to the Earth.
Now that's Jesus in the bible. And if you say that it's not the stars, it's some meteorites or comments or whatever, you're making up stuff because you are filtering that through a bias you've been brainwashed with from birth. Alright? The Bible says the stars. I was talking to a person who was a science teacher, who's a a strong Christian, and I said I said, what about the stars falling to the earth?
And he goes to to Revelation 6 and he says, well, don't you think that's just what what John was seeing was asteroids and meteorites falling? It wasn't really stars. And I said, well I said, you got a problem with that if you're gonna say it's just asteroids and meteorites because Jesus said it was stars. So did Jesus know what he was talking about or not? So here's a place that, seriously, the Bible does not agree with the cosmology of this world system, NASA and everybody else.
And what's amazing to me let me just say this. What's amazing to me is that Christians have tried to mix the world system cosmology into Christianity, and they don't work. You can't do it. And this is proof of that right here. And I'm gonna show you what the atheists do.
Now let's listen to this. This is Neil deGrasse Tyson again, one of your top astrophysicists, astronomers, and here's what he says about this issue of the stars. The Bible's saying the star's falling.
Speaker 4: People who make this case that that was the beginning and that there had to be something that Provoke the beginning. Do you give them an a at least for trying to reconcile faith and reason?
Speaker 3: I don't think they're reconcilable.
Speaker 4: What do you mean?
Speaker 3: Well well so let me say that differently. All efforts that have been invested by Brilliant people of the past have failed at that exercise. They just failed. And so I don't I I don't the track record is so poor That going forward, I have essentially zero confidence, near zero confidence that there would be fruitful things to emerge from the effort to reconcile. So, for example, if you If you knew nothing about science and you read, say, the Bible, the Old Testament, which in Genesis is an account of nature.
That's that's what that is. And I said to you, give me your description of the natural world based only on this. You would say the world was created in 6 days and that Stars are just little points of light much lesser than the sun. In fact, they can fall out of the sky. Right?
Because that's what happens during During the, revelation, during one of the signs that Yeah. The second coming is that the stars will fall out of the sky and land on Earth. To even write that means you don't know what those things are. You have no concept of what the actual universe is. So everybody who tried to make proclamations about the physical universe based on Bible passages Got the wrong answer.
So what happened was when science discovers things and you wanna stay religious or you wanna continue to believe that the Bible is is unerring, what you would do is you would say, well, let me go back to the Bible and reinterpret it. Then you say things like, oh, they didn't really mean that literally. They meant that figuratively. So this whole sort of reinterpretation of the fig how figurative the poetic passages of the bible are came after Science showed that this is not how things unfolded. And so the educated religious people are perfectly fine with that.
It's the fundamentalists who want to say that the Bible is the literally, literal truth of God That and want to see the Bible as a science textbook, who are knocking on the science doors of the schools trying to put that content And the science here, enlightened religious people are not behaving that way. So you say, yes. Science is cool. We're good with that, and use the Bible for to get your spiritual Enlightenment and your emotional fulfillment.
Speaker 4: I have known serious religious people, not fundamentalists, who We're scared when Carl Sagan opened his series with the words
Speaker 3: The cosmos is all it is or ever was or ever will be.
Speaker 4: I mean, that scared them because they interpret that to mean, then if this is it, there's nothing else. No god and no life after.
Speaker 3: For for religious people, many people say, well, god is within you Lord God, the the ways that people have shaped this rather than god as an old gray bearded man in the clouds. So if God is within you, what I'm sure Carl would say, in you in your mind in your mind, and we can measure the neurosynaptic
Speaker 0: Okay. Now now we're gonna move on from here, but do you understand? See, you say, why does it matter? Because people have believed this instead of believing what's god's word said, and many people have fallen away. They've walked away.
People have said, I'm I'm not following god anymore. I'm not even Christian. I I watched the thing this this week where even many bible scholars are departing because they accept science as god, it's like it's infallible, instead of trusting God's word, let me tell you, this world is full of lies, folks. I believe they've lied about everything. I believe they've lied about the sun, moon, stars, the whole thing, I can tell you this much.
I don't care how many people you brought in here. I'm gonna stand with what Jesus said and the way he described it and what's beautiful about it is every now and then, he gives us the ability to prove it. And, I have Joe Hanvey here. We may call him up, but Joe Hanvey is a has been doing some amazing experiments in photography. He has actually photographed the nebula with the stars in front of them with a with a shadow behind the stars on the nebula showing you is not what you've been told.
Matter of fact, NASA artists do most of what you what you think is space and planets and all this stuff is NASA artistry, and I have them admitting it. Disney. Guy worked for Disney, now works for NASA. I'm gonna skip this atheist right we're gonna now I wanna I'm I'm talking about how science can impact. Here's a story of how science can impact young Christians, and boy, we do we have young Christians falling away from God left and right?
And one of the reasons is they go to school, they go to college and they start getting taught this stuff that is not the way that the the creation is not the way God says, not the way the Bible says it, and they fall away. And some, it's even worse than that. They commit suicide. Jesse Kilgore, community college student in New York, took his own life when he was just 22 years old. He was raised into a devout evangelical Christian household, was a firm believer of Christianity until he took a biology class in college, which led him to experiencing a crisis of faith.
The biology professor also recommended Jesse to read The God Delusion, a book by written by atheist Richard Dawkins, an atheist biologist, as a result, reading his book and taking the biology class, he learned a lot of things which challenged and contradicted his own beliefs, which caused him to abandon his faith and ultimately take his own life. This is it's sad, but it's true. And this is where we are. You could I could give a lot of examples of this. There's more studies, but it says right here in a a research study on the impacts some science and the discontinuation of faith and practice in Christianity in young adults, in their observations, this is the Center For science and culture did this study.
They noted that 59 to 70% of students growing up with a Christian background will likely lose their faith or abandon their religion by the time they reach college. An example of someone who contributes to this statistic is Kyle Simpson who had a similar story to Jesse, like like Jesse, Kyle was raised a Christian, but science changed his mind and beliefs when he was in his twenties, although he did not take his own life like Jesse, Kyle decided to discontinue his faith in Christianity. So you're gonna tell me it doesn't matter. Now I wanna say this tonight. I wanna say hey to our atheist friends.
One of the reasons we're going down this road is because, here we have Owen Morgan who has about 400,000 followers, is another guy, the friendly atheist who has about a100000. They're all talking about they're gonna watch this tonight. Well, I'm here to tell you right now, I'm gonna show you some fruit, that when people have seen the evidence for a flat, geocentric, non rotating earth, that many atheists have seen the evidence and come to Jesus as their lord and savior. They've come back to the faith. And I just wanna say hey to them and I appreciate them sharing on their channels that we were this debate and now they're laughing it up.
But I wanna tell you what, they don't realize. They're losing a lot of their atheist friends over what we can show them. They're coming to Jesus. Now let me share with you. Let's go do this this right here.
Now, I wanna say and I put this up because I want everybody here, but I'm gonna read this. That many atheists have come to know God. They've come back to the bible. They've come to know Jesus as their lord and savior. And they didn't do it because all of a sudden, they started believing the bible out of the blue, or somebody showed them something, another another lie or another trick or another, you know, another fairy tale.
As many atheists and scientists think that those of us who believe in a geocentric, stationary, flat earth only came to this belief via our religion or crackpot YouTube videos, but that is not the case. It was seeing the evidence of real experiments, doing the math, making our own conclusions from our own observations about the nature of our world that brought most of us to this understanding of creation. For 99% of us, it was after seeing the evidences that we all realized what the bible taught, that the bible taught these truths all along. And it is that journey of examining the evidences that show we do actually live on a geocentric, stationary, flat earth that has brought many atheist agnostics to faith in the bible and thus finding God almighty, our lord Jesus Christ, as their creator and personal savior. Now I wanna show you, we're not afraid of science.
We actually go out with high zoom cameras and telescopes and lasers and actually do test in different climate you know, in different, weather and different conditions to see what we can prove, and I'm gonna show you some of that in a minute. But I wanna here's a testimony that this is Paul Logberg from Sweden. He was raised an atheist, became a mechanical engineer and began looking into some conspiracies and and came across flat earth, and he laughed at it. And then well, you'll hear a story. It's only 2 minutes.
Speaker 5: I was an atheist 39 years, have gone gone through universities, schooling, everything, Never had really an interest in god. Never really was a god hater, but, of course, I had other Issues like idols and stuff and like all, atheists have. In Sweden, basically, all, people are atheists. 80% atheists, 15% Muslims nowadays, and, whatever, 5% others. I was, one of the atheists, of course, like all.
2011, I started MSC. You know, what is wrong with the world? Why is the world going absolutely crazy? Land that flat earth around 2015. Yes.
April 2015. Just laughed it off. Okay. This is completely crazy. But after a month, I looked into it anyway and, thought I'll get a good laugh.
But no. I I saw it right. Okay. There's no way that it's a ball. And then I got interested in, you know, what does the Bible actually say?
Oh, if if it was right about that already from the start, Maybe it's right about the other parts also regarding the endings. Turned out, yes, it was. Gave my life to Christ in, 2016. And, yeah. Didn't look back.
The world is just so filled with lies. It's It's actually quite sickening and disturbing, but, we have one hope. That's Jesus and his word, and I'm grateful for it. I hope this helps someone. Take care.
God bless. Bye bye.
Speaker 0: Now I love this. Paul flu in 2017 all 6 foot 7 of him flew all the way from Sweden because he wanted a pastor that believed the Bible to baptize him in water. Amen? But he's not the only one. This is Soren from Denmark.
He actually heads up the denodal Europe paged now, but he was a complete atheist. I want you to hear his story.
Speaker 6: How you guys doing? My name is Soren. I'm from Denmark. I used to be an atheist up until 2015 when I mockingly began researching flat Earth. And when I had researched that for about a year and a half, I came to the realization that we've been lied to, that the earth was in fact a And while I was researching that creator, I came across videos from pastor Dean and the late Rob Skipper.
And as I was watching them, they were talking about creation, biblical creation, which matched perfectly the research I've been doing and Thousands of others, on the true shape and nature of creation. So my trust in the Bible was restored where I, And as I continued listening to these guys, their sermons, I began to understand sin, And I understood the gospel and why Jesus had to come and die on the cross for us, which led me to True repentance and saving faith in Jesus Christ and his finished work on the cross. And now I am a born again spirit filled disciple of Jesus. Praise be to god. So I'm forever thankful that truth in truth God bless y'all.
Love from Denmark.
Speaker 0: Hallelujah. I'm sure Soren's watching right now. One more before we move on from this. This is Chelsea. She's actually here tonight, and god's done a great thing.
Speaker 7: A staunch atheist for about 15 years, and it was a dark and despairing worldview that I wouldn't wish on anyone. It always left me wondering what's the point. I found this little corner of hope and mystery and the possibility of life out there, And I could fill a library with all the science fiction that I read over the years, trying to build a void of atheism Enter COVID. And like so many others, I asked myself, what else are they lying about? And it turns out the answer is everything.
It turns out the world is run by a bunch of Satan loving liars. We will have a so bamboozled that we don't even know where we are. It turns out that we've been living in their science fiction. You see, when you tell a story that begins with something exploding out of nothing, Out of a gazillion years and a whole lot of chance, you don't need god for that story to make sense. In fact, you have to do some disingenuous gymnastics To write god into that story.
But if you see that we're really living in something like a cosmic terrarium, you can't avoid the conclusion that we're in somebody's terrarium. Right or right, God know that story. I dare you. So there's only a few short steps for me from the mind blowing realization of the flat earth to the god of the bible. I thought, okay.
There really isn't any evidence to support the heliocentric globe model short of CGI. But why would they construct a lie at that scale And how. The biblical worldview is the only worldview that can truly make sense of that level of deception. The level of deception that has fooled multiple generations into believing that we're on a spinning water ball on a vacuum, but everything in our experience screams the opposite. That level of deception demands that we confront the existence of evil because that's what their science fiction is, and that's its purpose.
People ask me, What does it matter what shape the earth is? Well, the truth always matters. No lies denying. But I'd asked them, Would they construct such a massive life for no reason? No way.
This massive lie has an equally massive purpose from beginning to end. It's the very foundation of the scientific worldview that aims to make god irrelevant. And I bet the farm that it plays a critical role in the great deception in the times ahead. In my experience, had I not come to the truth of creation, I can't imagine what else would have not only shaken me from my atheism, but also brought me Just hear the god's word. I'd heard the gospel.
I grew up in the bible belt, but I could not reconcile that worldview With the one that I'd already implicitly accepted, which told me that the world is a meaningless accident. I had to first understand the very foundation There's supposedly scientific creation stories alive before I could come to the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ. At the end of the day, I think the inherent cynicism of the heliocentric universe that exploded from nothing is fundamentally incompatible with the gospel of Jesus. Do you really think that our creator, who's so personal that he offered himself as a sacrifice so that we may be redeemed, matches up with some behind the scenes intelligent designer who had a veiled hand behind the Big Bang that created an ever expanding universe where there's no such thing as up or down. I don't.
I believe we are very carefully, intentionally, and lovingly placed in the world. It's not just some random piece of a vast creation, but That's the very heart of creation itself. I believe that he is not in heaven. We vaguely imagine us somewhere else, That he his throne is just right above us. He has invested in us.
That much the bible makes clear. And so I pray That you reject the lie, I would have you believe otherwise.
Speaker 0: Now literally in my book, Like Clay Under the Seal, I have 1 chapter dedicated to atheists come to Jesus, and it's testimony after testimony. And for the sake of time, I'm not going to read them all here. But you see, I could do this I could do this for 2 hours on atheists that have come to Jesus because of understanding and seeing the evidence for a flat, stationary, geocentric, non rotating, flat earth as our government documents wanna say. I'm I'm gonna speed through this. I'm gonna I'm gonna say this.
These are reasons people that that people believe that we live on a spinning ball or sphere orbiting the sun in an ever expanding universe. These are really the main reasons. Boat's disappearing from the bottom up. We can say that doesn't happen. Pictures from space, we found out that that's a lot of fakery.
Fish eye lens photography that creates a fake curve all the time. The alleged shadow of the Earth on the moon's surface during the lunar eclipse, that's easy to deal with. Foucalt's it's pendulum. I mentioned that earlier. Erasthenes, who probably didn't even exist, but his experiment works on a flat plane with close son exactly, so there's no sense in that, using that as an argument.
Circumnavigation, you can go around your neighborhood or you can go around a You can do it either way and you end up in back in the same place. And satellites and GPS, I have a great deal about what those are from not only, declassify government documents, but just available documents. And, of course, grandiose scientific explanations. Now I'm just gonna show you this. Of course, we've all seen this.
If the boat went over a curve, there'd be no way to bring it back. But as you see when you zoom in, the boat's there. Now if it's over a curve, you can't see it. Nothing would enable you to see that boat. But it I don't care how powerful your Zoom, but when you zoom in, it's the the horizon's empty and you zoom in and the boat's there, they're not disappearing over a curve.
They're just getting out of our ability to see it. So that is another discussion. Here's the video
Speaker 1: I showed you about perspective. There's a guy walking away, and
Speaker 0: you notice that his feet are disappearing.
Speaker 1: You
Speaker 0: and, of course, here's, so you're telling me you can drag that ship back over the curve or that that little telescope there. Now I don't have time to go through. I'm gonna just run through these very quickly, but we know that we've caught them photoshopping clouds and stuff. They create these images of earth. They're not real pictures.
Even the guy who did the blue marble says it's photoshopped because it has to be. I mean, it's ridiculous. NASA artists, do the pictures of the world. This is just
Speaker 8: And this is sort of how it
Speaker 0: Here's here's 2 pictures they tell us are from face of the earth, I want y'all to look at North America. Which one is correct? Because the 1 on the one there, the big one. Seems like North America's taken up a big section of the ball there, much bigger than it really is. So we we get these kind of things, and they want us to trust them, but it's just impossible.
Here's where they faked the, you know, the big picture we had for years was Apollo 17. And Apollo 17, they said, you know, they're at the moon 240,000 miles away. They can see the whole earth. But look, they only got a picture of that little circle there. The they didn't get the whole lit side of the earth, so it proves that they weren't high enough to get it, that they faked it.
Speaker 9: Finally, the element that seals their
Speaker 0: thing happened on the way to the moon, Bart Sabriel. He shows the picture footage. How many of you wanna see it? Y'all wanna see it real quick? Alright.
I'll back up and show just so you know you can't trust them. Here we go. I'll play it.
Speaker 9: Finally, the element that seals their fate. Of all the footage of Apollo 11 requested from NASA over a 5 year period, 1 gem was discovered Just before the completion of this documentary, an old reel received by mistake. It contains the raw or unedited footage of the crew of Apollo 11, Michael Collins, Edwin Aldrin Junior, and Neil Armstrong, Staging part of their mission for nearly an hour in living color with exceptionally clear behind the scenes audio of conversations discussing the techniques used to achieve a disingenuous picture depicting the Earth at a distance In order to falsely demonstrate their far journey from it and their ability to survive passing through the Van Allen radiation belts, It cannot be misconstrued that this staging was done for some other reason prior to the mission. For the wheel itself is slated and dated July 18th, 19th, and 20th 1969. The very days of the mission when they were said to be Again, the illusion they are attempting to create is the Earth at a distance to demonstrate their far journey from it and their ability to survive passing through the Van Allen radiation belts.
Understand too that only about 20 seconds of this raw footage was ever broadcast to the public, and these conversations discussing their deception were believed to be private until now. Here, they discussed that these television transmissions were in fact not broadcast live as everyone believed. They were first screened and edited For playback later.
Speaker 8: Hi, Roger Neil. We just wanted a there is such a weekend when we get to playback. We can sort of correlate what we're saying. Thank you very much.
Speaker 9: Here, they discussed the fact that they have turned out the lights and have blocked out sunlight from entering the spacecraft through the other windows As to not cause any reflected light to fall onto the spacecraft's wall in the foreground.
Speaker 1: Okay. Very good. Well, we gotta have the sun coming in
Speaker 9: The reason this was done is so that the truth of the matter would not be revealed. It is this, though the federal government would have you believe That this is a view of Earth from a distance out of the spacecraft's window as it nears the moon. It is not. What they have ingeniously done is placed the camera at the back of the spacecraft and centered the lens on a circular window in the foreground, outside of which it is completely filled with the earth In low orbit, the circumference of the window then appears to be the diameter of the earth at a distance with the darkened walls of the spacecraft appearing to be the blackness of space around it. That is why they wanted the interior dark and blocked out the sun from entering through the other windows.
Speaker 1: Here you
Speaker 9: can see the extruded window, probably 2 inches thick at the bottom. This is because the Earth's shine is coming in at a downward angle. It also causes the earth to appear to be an irregularly shaped circle, for you are seeing the outside of the window at the bottom And the inside of the window at the top, which together form 2 different sized halves
Speaker 0: of a circle.
Speaker 9: Subsequently, This take was never used. As they perfected the shot, a crescent shaped piece of black material was inset slightly into the window To create the illusion of the Earth's terminator line dividing night and day.
Speaker 8: Know that that, could you just
Speaker 9: It is uncannily convincing. During this segment, intended to be edited and played back later for the worldwide television audience, Dated July 18, 1969, Neil Armstrong condemns himself as he states that he is 130,000 miles out Or halfway to the moon, as the NASA flight log also states on this date, when he is in reality In low earth orbit of a few 100 miles.
Speaker 8: Hi, Roger. Houston Apollo 11. Calling in for about a 130,000 mile belt.
Speaker 9: Here, during another segment, also intended to air after review, Neil Armstrong falsely explains to the viewers How the shot is attained? By putting the camera's lens to the window's glass as it would have to be if they were the claimed distance away from the Earth.
Speaker 1: And we only have 1, window that, has
Speaker 8: a view of the Earth, and it's filled up with a TV camera.
Speaker 9: If the window was completely filled up with a TV camera, as he stated, then an astronaut's arm would not be able to get between the camera and the window As it obviously does here in this uptake.
Speaker 8: South America becomes invisible just on beyond the Terminator or inside the shadow.
Speaker 9: You can also notice how the astronaut operating the camera reacted to the mistake by attempting to pan away from it.
Speaker 0: Alright. I'm gonna end that. You you guys see. We can't this is why we can't trust their picture. Finally But I'm gonna go on.
I wanna go through all this. I could go through all the fakery. Bible stuff. I can I can give you this proof all day long right here what things really are? High altitude balloons, that's what satellites are.
We're gonna go down through all of this stuff. I'm gonna go. They that's what they say is out there. You never see those satellites and debris out there, though, in the ISS flyover feeds, But here we go. Let's let's get to this.
Y'all see I had a lot of slides. There's long distance photography of Chicago, 60 miles. You shouldn't be able to see any of it. Alright. I I can't do it all.
I'm getting to the bible because I know we're we're out of time. All this stuff's on my website, folks. The 7 the 7 fold doctrine of creation series. This is our own test. I can show you.
We did we saw spool sitting on the dock at 11 miles away. That's my film right there at 11 miles away. Spool sitting on the dock. This Earth's not curved. I can tell you that right now.
You can go with us and we can show you. See, let me zoom out. At 11 miles, there should be a 7 story building bulge blocking my view of what's sitting on the dock in the Alabama state docs there. Now let's keep going. I've done shots.
We've catch cars going across bridges at 13, 14 miles away. We know the height of them and everything. So we've done our own experiments, And we've had PhDs in physics. We've had engineers. We've had army officers.
Just to let you see. I'm going through them quick here. I'm gonna get to the Bible stuff. I had 244 slides, y'all. Scientists prove that that Kansas is flatter than a pancake all the way across.
Alright. Let's go here. We're we're to the Bible. Let me do this. Alright.
So we go back to the Genesis. Let's just I'm gonna go through the Bible as quickly as I can on this stuff. In the beginning, god created the heavens and the earth, and the earth was out form of void. Darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of god moved upon the face of the waters. And god said, let there be light, and there was light.
And god saw the light that it was good, and god divided the light from the darkness. And god called the light day, and the darkness he called night. And the evening and the morning were the 1st day. Now I want you to notice something. He uses the term here, first of all, the waters.
One thing we know about water, it always finds its level. We use levels to build buildings and to keep them level. And the term face is a term is a geometry term. It's a math term. And to use the term face of the earth and face of the waters is used multiple time many times in the bible.
And what does a face mean? An individual flat surface of a solid object. But even if you wanna argue that, I can tell you that you look at and you go out and you see, like a pond or a lake and you see this perfect reflection upon it, that perfect reflection, that mirror reflection that you're seeing cannot happen on a curved surface, only on a flat let's keep going here. Here's the key though. Here's here's what what most ministers and even so called creation ministries get wrong is this issue is, what is the firmament?
What does the bible teach about it? God said, let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters and let it divide the waters from the waters. And god made the firmament and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament, and god called the firmament I'm gonna break this down as fast as I can for you. He talks about the open firmament of heaven, our atmosphere with a bird's flock. The bible teaches that the firmament that he's talking about here that he calls heaven is a solid crystalline structure that supports waters above it.
That is called heaven, and then there is the 3rd heaven where the throne of God is. Alright? That's your 3 heavens, not some outer space, not some expanse. In fact, the most disingenuous and the most dishonest definition of this word is to call it some empty expanse. That is not how it's defined.
That is not how Moses and Joshua and everyone believed what it was, even Josephus. I wanna show you that. We gotta let the Bible interpret the Bible. When you talk about what is the firmament, right, we know that god said here, Genesis, 1627 about firmament divided the waters from the waters. The flood happened here, and it says that there were 3 things in 600 year of Noah's life, in the 2nd month, the 17th day of the month, the same day where all the fountains of the great deep were broken up.
That's 1. And the windows of heaven were open. That's 2. And god remembered Noah, and this was at the end of the flood and all the cattle that was with him. And god made wind to pass over the earth, and the waters were assuaged for the fountains of the great deep and the windows of heaven were stopped and the rain.
So you had the fountains of the deep, the windows of heaven, which opened to let that water in that was above, and then you also had rain. Anybody that says it was just rain is not being honest with the scriptures. It's that fact. We had 3 sources of water at the flood. What Christians believe for many years was a thing called the canopy theory.
Doctor Carl Baugh taught it and others taught it where they said that that the firmament was a vapor canopy that was around the earth that condensed and then flooded the earth, and thus doing away with the firmament. The problem with that is the bible proves that wrong, that the the firmament collapsed as a canopy because 13 150 years after the flood, the Holy Spirit moved on David to say, praise him, you heavens, and you waters that be above the heaven. Let them praise his name or praise the name of the Lord for he commanded And they were created. He hath established them forever and ever. He hath made a decree which shall not pass.
So anybody that says that the firmament or this was condensed vapor canopy that disappeared is not true. We have 13 150 years later, he's telling us the waters are still above the heavens. The Hebrew word for firmament is the Hebrew word rakia. It has a root word. Almost all Hebrew words have a three letter root word.
So you have is the word for firmament and the root word is raka. Alright? Here's the definition of these words according to not only what the Hebrew meant, but also what they believed. And so we have to see how god uses it. But firmament rakia does not mean an empty fans, anybody who tells you that the firmament or rakia means empty expanse, like, like doctor Danny Faulkner answers in Genesis.
He will say it's an empty expanse, that the firmament is outer space. He is not being true to the definition of the Hebrew word. Literally, it says it is an expansion of plates, broad plates beaten out. So it's literally the word means taking something that's solid and beating it into a shape. Okay?
That's the definition of the word. The verb raka acquires the sense of beating out precious metals, spreading that out, and results to spread over to overlay. Alright? He goes on here. Of course, this is the Brown driver Briggs.
It says, extended surface, solid, expanse as beaten out, not an empty expanse, but expanding something that's solid over something. That's a picture of this word. And the Hebrews, the ancient Israelites, believed that it was solid. The firmament was a solid structure and called it the vault of heaven. So here's your definition.
The vault of heaven or firmament regarded by the Hebrews as solid and supporting the waters above. This is what all of the ancient Jews believed because they believe the bible. Amen? They believed it about the firmament. Here is another lexicon.
Yesenia's Hebrew Caldi Lexicon defines Rockia like this. The firmament of heaven spread out like a hemisphere above the earth, like a splendid, lucid, translucently clear, transparent, crystalline, glassy, allowing the maximum passage of light as glass, sapphire, stone, to which the stars were supposed to be fixed and over which the Hebrews believed that there was a heavenly ocean. Now, this is another lexicon defining it as they believe it as the Bible spells it out, not as new Copernican Christians wanna believe it is to be. Now let's keep going. It says, additionally, Hebrew scholars believe again, when they translated you know, in 250 BC, they translated the Hebrew Old Testament into, from Hebrew to Greek, that was called the Septuagint version around 2 50 BC.
When they translated the word firmament, they used the word stereooma. Alright? And when they use the word stereooma, that is known word. Thayer's Greek lexicon defines stereooma, that which has been made firm, the firmament, the arch of the sky, which in early times was thought to be solid, a fortified place. Do you hear that?
So the word they translated so you're gonna tell me Hebrew scholars translating the bible from Hebrew and the Greek scholars translating it to make they just decided, no, we we we should pick a thin vapor or some kind of gas. No. They said something that's firm, that's solid. Again, this is what the scriptures teach, and let's keep going because there's more. Here's the, it says, an ex strong extended surface, expands, beat now, just showing you that it's it's multiple lexicons.
Now here's Job 3718. Now this is gonna show you you know, this may not be technically God speaking, but this is one of the wise men of the east that were Job's strong and as a molten looking glass. So what this proves, you can say, well, that wasn't god talking, but this is what they believed. And why did they believe it? Because they believed the bible, they believe what god had already revealed to them.
But let's keep going here. Is it that way? Now the Hebrew word for spread out there is raca. Now here's the definition of raca, and you need to we're gonna come back to this in a minute. The definition of raca means to pound the earth or as a sign of passion, to expand by hammering, by implication to overlay with sheets of metal, to make broad, to spread abroad into place, to stamp oh, somebody say stamp.
Or like a seal pressed down, this is what a stamp is, he says this that's what this word rock is. Now let's look at the the ancient, Josephus, the historian now many believe that Josephus was also of a priestly line, that he was a priest and a pharisee, so he was well acquainted with what the Jews believed about creation. And this is what he said about the firmament. He said and this is in book 1 entitled the constitution of the world and the deposition disposition of the elements, Josephus, the 1st born in the 1st century but crossed over into the 2nd century. He said after this, on the 2nd day, he, god, placed the heaven over the whole world, separated it from other parts, he determined that it should stand by itself.
So he's talking about the firmament here, that god placed it over the whole earth and that it stands by itself. In fact, in architecture, an arch is the strongest structure that you can build, and it also must be strong because it supports a lot of water. And he says here that he placed this firmament, the crystalline notice he says crystal. Crystalline firmament, round it and together in agreement and agreeable to the earth and fitted it for the giving of moisture and rain and for the affording advantages of dues. On the 4th day, he adorned the heaven with the sun, moon, and the stars and appointed them their courses.
So this right here, Josephus is teaching a true biblical Hebrew cosmology because as god placed a firmament over the earth, he says the sun, moon, and stars are in that firmament, and they all move in a circuit. So he's teaching the sun moves, the moon moves, the earth moves, not I mean, the the star's sun and the moon, but not the earth. You understand? This is what the Jews taught and believed. Alright?
Now let's keep going. Does the bible say more about this? And then basically, god made a terrarium. This is the longest lasting terrarium in the world. You put the right things in a terrarium, guess what?
Things flourish. They live forever. It's a beautiful structure that god made. Now let's go to this. We need confirmation.
We'll go to the firmament. Is it crystal? What is it? So Ezekiel's talking about it, Ezekiel chapter 1, and he says the likeness of the firmament upon their heads the living creatures was as the color the King James used a color, but the definition of that word is the appearance of the terrible crystal stretched forth over their heads above, and there was a voice from the firmament that was over their heads and when they stood and they had let down their wings. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne as the appearance of a sapphire stone, and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness and appearance of a man above it.
So Ezekiel in his vision, he is seeing this firmament over their heads, and he said the appearance of it is like a terrible crystal. And he says, and I see the throne of God sitting upon it. And I see this this this image of a man upon it. So the bible says God's throne sits upon this firmament that's solid, and it's like a sea of glass. I wonder where that's in the bible.
He keep we keep on Revelation 4 says after this, I looked and behold, the door was opened in heaven, and the 1st voice which I heard was as it were a trumpet talking with me. He said, come up hither, and I will show thee the things which must be hereafter. And immediately, I was in the spirit and behold, a throne was set in heaven and one sat upon the throne. And he that sat upon the throne was the leucophane like Jasper an assorting stone, and there was a rainbow round about the throne in the side of an emerald. And the throne and before the throne, there was a sea of crystal a sea of glass like unto crystal.
This is what the bible said. That before the throne is like a sea of glass that's like crystal, soul. And god's throne is seated upon it. And it's interesting he says that there is an emerald rainbow our light emanating from that and I wonder what that might be. But, of course, the scientists say that's electromagnetic radiation from the Right.
You know what I believe it is? The glory of God coming into the earth, shining through the crystalline dome that he sits upon Revelation 15 also refers to the sea of glass at the throne of God. He says, I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous, 7 angels having the 7 last plagues, and for in them is filled up the wrath of God. And I saw as it were a sea of glass ass mingled with fire. Well, guess what?
One of the ways you make glass is melting sand by with fire. And he says, he said now listen to this. He said a sea of glass mingled with fire, and then that had gotten victory over the beast and over his image and over his mark and over the number of his names, stand on the tea of glass having the hearts of god in their hands. Folks, Benny Hinn the other day said heaven was a was a planet, another planet out there. That is the biggest bunch of nonsense I ever heard in my life.
It's right above us. God's throne sits upon it, and he looks at us like grasshoppers through his firm in the dome. This, Amos 96, of course, the he the, you know, the King James I love my James Bible but sometimes they did not translate words pick the right words correctly. I know some people I think that they were perfect translators. They were not.
This in the amplified you actually have to look up every word in the Hebrew in this verse to even understand what it's talking about. But listen to this. This is the amplified version of 96, it is he, speaking of God, who builds his upper chambers in the heavens and has established his vaulted dome, the firmament of heaven over the earth. He who calls the waters of the sea and pours them out on the face of the earth, the lord is his name. So here's another scripture that gives you an idea of the firmament.
Now, here we are. The Bible teaches a circular flat earth, the North Pole, the magnetic center, the Antarctica, the ice walls. We've talked about that the earth is stationary. Now this is what the Bible says with a molten dome over it. Now let's keep going through the scriptures.
Any way you go from there, south, we could talk about this all day long. They say there's not an ice wall, but there it is. Antarctica is the ice wall boundary around the oceans. I've got whole sermon is like 2 hours long on just Antarctica and the ends of the earth. There it is.
Job 26:10, he's compassed the waters with bounds until night and day come to an end. He's describe a circular limit. Right? It's not on the face of the waters. I mean, you just keep going.
He has fixed a circle on the surface of the waters and on and on. There's even declassified documents that says most of the coast of Antarctica are covered by great depths of snow and ice, extends seaward beyond the shoreline, terminate with vertical cliffs approaching 200 feet in height. So I'm gonna say the wall is not there, but it is. Now language is important. Language is important.
A circle is not a ball. Okay? And god's word makes this very clear here that a circle is not a ball. In Isaiah 42, we're gonna read that in a minute, says it's he that sits upon the circle of the earth. There are people, Christians, that are still saying that that means there's a sphere.
It never says sphere. The definition this word is coug, and it means a circle. And it talks about in Proverbs, he inscribed a circle upon the face of the deep, not a sphere. In another place, bribed a circle upon the face of the deep, not a sphere. In another place, in Isaiah 22/18, he uses the term that the king's name translates ball, it is the word dur.
So there's 2 different words in the bible, Hebrew, the original Hebrew, for circle and ball, coog and dur. And god never uses, which means a sphere, to describe the earth. Never, never, never. Alright? Here it is.
You look it up, a circle, a circuit, a compass. This is the the strongest definitions. Circle, Proverbs 8. Here's the word dir. Just show you.
Look it up. It says ball, pile, something that has shape to it like that. Alright. Two different words for circle and ball. Never used.
Here it is. This is Proverbs. Says when he established the heavens, wisdom I, wisdom, was there when he drew a circle upon the face of the deep, when he made firm the skies above, when the fountains and springs of the deep became fixed and strong, when he set the sea its boundary so that the waters would not transgress the boundaries by his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth. So he's talking about god drew a circle. Let me tell you.
I built my own fire pit back when I turned 50. I'm I'm about to turn 56. I don't know if I can still do it, but I I you know what I did? I wanted a perfect circle because I wanted to build a 4 foot diameter fire pit out of the we have stones in our property. So what I did was I took a state and drove it in the ground.
I took a chain, ran it down the state, and I took another one out here 2 feet, and I inscribed me a circle and then I started building my outer wall. I just didn't put a firmament on it because I wanted to cook stuff here. Amen? Now this is again what God describes. Let's keep going.
Now, let's go back to that when he says he's made the sky strong like a molten looking glass. Now let's go back. Now let's go to look at Isaiah 4021 and 22. He says, have you not known? Have you not heard?
Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is he that sitteth upon the circle, coo, not dir, circle, not ball of the earth. And the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers person that stretches out the heavens as a curtain and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in. So when he's talking about spreading out the heavens, he's talking about when he spread out the firmament over the earth.
Notice he said like a tent. Like a tent, not a ball. Do y'all see the difference? I ain't never been in a spherical tent in my life camping. And god said he made the earth like a tent.
And here we are in a tent. Is the floor curved? No. God said this, you wanna know what the earth looks like? It's like a tent.
Just like a tent. And the word for tent of course, here's what an old tent like Abraham and Sarah would have been in, flat ground spread out over them for a place to dwell in, the word for tent here in the Hebrew is ohel, and it means tent. Right? But I wanna show you something. Let's let's go to this is Psalm 19.
Now Psalm 19, I'm I couldn't start out with the beginning, but this talks about how the firmament shows the handiwork of the lord. Alright. So the context of this, he starts out talking about the firmament, and then he says this. He says their line has gone out through all the earth, their words to the end of the world. In them, talking about in the world, our world he made for us, he has set a tabernacle for the son, guess what the word tabernacle is here?
It is the Hebrew word ohel, which means a tent, meaning that the son is in the tent. Amen? Then he goes on to talk about the sun. He says he set a tabernacle, a tent for the sun, which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber and rejoices as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from one end of the heaven of the firmament to the other, and his circuit unto the ends of it, and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.
The bible word here for circuit, guess what it is? Hoog. It's a circle. Its circuit means to move in a circular path. So what we believe and what we see, what the bible teaches, what Joshua was saying it was happening was the sun was moving in its circular path.
Now get this. This is this is what'll blow your know notice it says that nothing will will will escape the heat of our sun. Nothing. Somebody say nothing. Guess what?
Look up nothing in the Hebrew and it means nothing. So let me ask you a question. If if nothing that God made can escape escape the heat of our sun. How are there galaxies millions and millions of light years away? The Bible says the sun is in the tent, inside the firmament, closer to us, smaller, moving in a circular path, and that nothing that god made for us escapes the heat of it.
So y'all gotta deal with that one right there big time. Here's another one. There it is, an example of it in the tent. Now is there evidence to show that the sun is inside the tent, inside the firmament, closer to us, smaller, we have it every day. You you you're gonna start watching.
Some of you who are skeptics that don't believe this, you're gonna walk outside one day and you're gonna see this. You're gonna see it with the sun. You're gonna see it with the moon. But you're gonna see the clouds behind the sun and the moon. You're gonna see this.
I have photographed this. If the sun is 93,000,000 miles away, there's no way there should ever be a cloud behind it. Not ever. And notice that Job said there in 37/21, thou men see not the bright light or the sun that's in the clouds which the wind passes away. He's trying to tell us where is the bright light he made?
The great the great light. Where is it? In here with the clouds. And sometimes we catch the clouds behind the sun. Even photographers who aren't trying to catch it.
Look at that. And then somebody wanna say, oh, is this the sun so bright? It's just an illusion. And then somebody puts a negative filter on it and proves it right there. Clouds are in front behind.
I'll tell you something else about a sun 93,000,000 miles away. Let me tell you. There's more. It doesn't make hot spots. If that sun is 93,000,000 white this is a high altitude balloon that reaches a 110,000 feet.
If that sun is 93,000,000 miles away, how is there a hot spot directly under it. There should be even light across those clouds. This could over and over again. Look at the hot spot there above it. This is just a photographer who's not even a flat earther.
The hot spot above the the the clouds are there. If that sun's 93,000,000 miles away, the light ray should be coming in evenly, and there's no way there should be hot spots. You might get refraction. You might say, oh, the light rays are refracted. But wait a minute now.
That's a hot spot, meaning that that's close to it. It's just like anybody that knows lighting in theater knows that you gotta deal with hot spots, meaning where the light's right on it. Right? I could do this all day long, but there's evidence. And this is why atheists are come to Jesus because of this kind of evidence.
The sun is not 93,000,000 miles away, it's just not. Like, these are pictures for people who are not flat earth, biblical cosmology believers. I could do it all day long. Look at that. It happens with the moon too regularly.
In fact, this Reddit post this is a person saying, I went out and saw the moon, and it looks like there's clouds behind it. There's no how is that possible? And people were like, it's just an illusion. You're not really seeing what you think you're seeing. That's their that's an excuse they have.
It's not you're not really seeing what you think you're seeing. Look at there. Clouds in front and behind the moon. I have photographed this myself. Now let's move on to this.
The Bible is very clear about this, you know, you wanna believe we're on a spinning, flying water ball. Now as you call yourself a Christian, you gotta deal with these verses right here. And this verse, we're gonna start with a few of them here, but it's pretty clear, Zechariah 111, and here's what it says. And the the the angel that was talking with Zechariah answered and said, he said, and the angel answered of the and they answered the angel of the lord among the myrtle trees says that we have walked to and fro through the earth. These are these entities that have gotten permission, and they said, behold, all the earth sitteth still and is at rest.
Somebody say all the earth All the earth. Sit us still Sit us still. And is at rest. How is it wobbling, spinning, flying, and in danger of asteroids hitting it? Some people say, oh, that's just talking about the people of the earth.
No. He said the earth is at rest. And guess what? I looked these words up in the he Hebrew. Guess what it means?
Sit still. At rest. Not moving. In fact, the word in the Hebrew actually, joshoa over here means to sit down, especially as a judge or sitting in ambush in quiet. Alright?
Now this is what this is. So you're if if you're gonna say, no, I believe the earth is spinning and it even wobbles as it spins and it's flying through an ever expanding universe, then then you just gotta throw this out right here. But is that the only place god said it? No. It's not.
So the earth is not moving. Here we go. 1st Chronicles 16/30. Fear before him all the earth. The world also shall be stable that it be not moved.
Now now literally, I heard doctor Danny Faulkner of answering Genesis say, well, this just means like David when he said he would he wouldn't be moved. No. We're not talking about a man and his emotion or his religious beliefs and his stance. We're talking about the earth. He said the earth is stable.
He said it that it be not moved. Psalm 93 1, the lord reigneth. He is clothed with majesty. The lord is clothed with strength wherewith he had girded himself. The world is established that it cannot be moved.
Somebody say that. Cannot be moved. When did Satan come in? God said the world's still at rest, said it cannot be moved, and Satan comes in with a theory says it's spinning, flying, wobbling, moving. Yet Einstein admitted that there's no experiment that can be done to prove that the Earth is moving.
But then he said, I still believe it's moving. Right? So Einstein knew you couldn't prove that the earth was moving. Now here's Psalm 104, 1 through 5. He says, blessed and affectionately praise the lord, oh my soul.
Oh, lord, my god. You are very great. You are clothed with splendor and majesty. You are the one who covers yourself with light as with a garment, who stretches out the heavens like a tent curtain. Here it is again.
Multiple scriptures. The Bible says, let by let by 2 or 3 witnesses, let every word be established. Here it is again. The world he stretched out like a tent to dwell in, who lays his beams in the upper chambers, in the waters above the firmament. That's actually exactly what the amplified says.
Who makes the clouds his chariot, who walks in the wings of the wind, who makes the winds his messenger, flames of fire, his ministers. Those are angels, so those are literal things. He said he established the earth on its foundation so that it will not be moved for ever
Speaker 1: and ever.
Speaker 0: So see, I'm on earth as still guy. You then you got the earth as moving guy over here. It's pretty plain. Then it takes us to Job 38. So if you think we take verses out of context, Job 38, you can't when you when you're talking about creation, god himself speaks to Job, and the context of that conversation is the nature of god's creation.
God himself speaking to Job. He said the lord answered Job out of the whirlwind and said, who is this that darkness counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up thy loins like a man and I will demand of thee and answer thou me. Where were you? Where was thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Declare if thou has understanding. Who had laid the measures thereof that thou knowest or who has stretch the line upon it. Whereupon the foundations thereof are fastened or who laid the cornerstone. So the context of this verse it's clear this passage is about creation. And God says he has foundations to the earth.
Now if you believe the spinning ball heliocentric nonsense, you believe that we have an iron molten core that is that is hotter than the sun, like 13,000 degrees with liquid magma around it and now they say there's even water around down in there somewhere. Does any of that sound like a foundation or stable or solid. No. No. In fact, they say that this here here's their example.
They say we have a lead nickel core. Have you ever checked the the melting point of lead and nickel? It's way lower than 13,000 degrees. But, of course, they'll say, well, it's because of pressure. It's always their little excuse to get out of something, but it's it's crazy.
God said he laid foundations of the earth. Let's keep reading. He literally said to sink them down just like you would. I used to be in construction. We used to have to dig deep foundations, And they were poured very specifically.
So he talks about it. Now I need to speed on through here. And you see it right there, the sink press. Oh, like a seal too. He's talks about the foundations.
Now here's 1st Samuel the 2/8, and it says, he raises up the poor out of the dust. He lifted up the beggar from the dunghill and set them among princes to make them inherit the throne of glory. For the pillars of the earth are the lord's, and he has set the world upon them. Does that does that does the heliocentric Copernican model sound like he's setting something on pillars, on a foundation that's stable, not moving, still in at rest. I I I I don't know yet know it.
See, this is what happened to me. You talk about what happened in the beginning, I just started believing this. I didn't filter it anymore through the world's nonsense. Now we see the world is still in a rest, and I mentioned a minute ago about the Michelson Morley experiment. It says Michelson Morley found the earth wasn't moving by using the speed of 2 light beams against one another.
The null results was one of the greatest puzzles of physics at the end of 19th century, he says the possibility was that there would be the velocity would be 0 and no fringe shift would be expected, But this implies that the earth is somehow a preferred object. So number 1, they discovered that the earth is really the center, the preferred object of the whole creation. And then he says that it was not what moving. And, of course, it was. They did find 1 6th movement of, again, only 1 6th of what it what they said it was supposed to be moving, the speed it's supposed to be moving.
They found 1 6th, so that's the movement again of the ether current, and I can't get into that. But here we go. Let's go let's get some this this here's one of these documents. Now I'm gonna read this is this is one of these documents I dug up. This is, let's see which one this is.
Oh, there it is. The general equations of motion for damaged asymmetric aircraft. Now what's interesting, this is point 1 and point 2. This is one of my favorites because here in introduction one, it says, in order to analyze the dynamics of damaged aircraft, the dynamic equations of motion must reflect the underlying physics. Somebody say must reflect the underlying physics.
So if they're gonna study damaged aircraft and how it how things happen to it in the sky. He says that the dynamic equations of motion must properly reflect the underlying physics. In the next part, he says this is just part 2. That was in part 1. He says, in this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non rotating earth are developed.
Now if in 0.1, you say that studying this must reflect the true proper underlying physics and the next thing you all of our equations of motion are based on a flat, non rotating earth. How else can you how else can you read that? And if there's not a flat, non rotating earth, why would it be in here? Why would this unicorn be here? I'm talking about the fairy tale unicorns.
Unicorns were real, by the way, but not the fairy tale unicorn. Y'all see that? Let's read it again. In order to analyze the dynamics of damaged aircraft, the dynamic equations of motion must properly reflect the underlying physics. In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat, non rotating earth are developed.
So here we have the Bible saying that the earth does not move. It's stable. It's at rest. We have the Michelson Morley experiment proving the earth does not move, that that just blew up physics in the end of 19th, early 19th century there. And then I mean, the late 19 century.
And then we have a government document about how damaged aircraft work, and they admit the the the proper underlying physics and equations are based on a non rotating flutter. That's 3 witnesses, y'all. Y'all hear me? That's the Bible, true scientist, and a technical manual about aircraft. 3 witnesses.
Now, I know some people love to pull this one out. So I'm gonna deal with this. Oh, about the earth hanging on nothing. What is that talking about? Right?
Let's just go ahead and get this out of the way. Right? Here's what it is. King James version says, hail is naked before him and destruction hath no covering. This is Job 26/6/7.
He stretches out the north over the empty place and hangeth the earth upon nothing. Now the the the Copernicans, the the ones that wanna have this space, the o c c c c, that's that's space. That's we're hanging on nothing. No. No.
No, my friend. And you must dig a little deeper because the Hebrew words bear out what this means. And, again, we have to take context. You can't take verse 7. You gotta take verse 6.
So he's talking about hell or shield or the underworld, the ground. What do we know is in hell? We know there's there's there's different degrees of hell. And I'm not talking about Dante's. I'm talking about bible degrees.
But we we know that we have different words and there's torturous for the deepest part of hell. And and then we know that Satan is gonna be bound when Jesus returns. Satan's gonna be bound and placed in the somebody say, bottomless pitch, which is in hell, which is the lowest part of hell. Okay? Now what this here is saying and let's go the amplified does it really well.
But the amplified bible, I'm looking at the original Hebrew word here when it says he stretches out the north over the empty place where he hangs the earth upon nothing, when it says the word for upon clarifies this question about the earth allegedly hanging upon nothing, an empty place is the word tohu. Now tohu in Hebrew, tohu vabohu, was used in the creation. It says the earth was without form and void and darkness covered the deep. Well, if you look this word up, it means desolation, destruction, chaos. And, I can't get into all of that right there, but he says that is pronounced tohu, right, is chaos, wilderness, waste, confusion, a place of vanity or emptiness.
The Hebrew word hereupon is all which can be translated above or over. And so in the amplified, it says, Sheol, the place of the dead, is naked before God and abandoned the place of destruction has no covering for his eyes. It is he who spreads out the northern skies over the emptiness and hangs the earth over nothing. See, there is this is what we believe. Nobody knows how deep the earth is.
God said the heaven for height and the earth for depth, nobody would know. It's unsearchable, unknowable. The deepest hole ever dug is about 8 miles. The Russians did it. We don't know anything beyond that.
But at some point down there in hell, there is nothingness. There's a place of vanity and emptiness. There's a bottomless pit where Satan's gonna be for a 1000 years. And God stretched it out. And if you guys saw my mountain of God in the north in paradise series, some of you if you hadn't seen that, you need to watch it.
You understand that God's throne is right above the North Star. The North Pole is right there. And where we're taught, the Bible shows us that it's really underneath underneath there is where paradise and hell starts, right there. So it makes sense. This verse makes sense when you know the truth of the shape of the earth and the nature of things.
But taking this into context, it's not talking about hanging the earth in some empty space. He's talking about hanging the earth. Oh, the earth is just over this place of nothingness. So we deal with it. Now we get to Joshua.
I'm just gonna what did he say? Sun stands still upon Gibeon and the moon in the Valley of Achelon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, and the people avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is it not written in the book of Jacer? So the sun here's the bible says, so the sun stood still in the midst of heaven.
That means it was it was moving, not the Earth. So Joshua here is teaching a completely different cosmology than the world of and many of you have accepted. So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven and hastened not to go down about a whole day. And here's what's interesting. He said the sun was over Gibeon and the moon over the valley of Azulon.
Do you know what that means? The sun and the moon were over specific places that were pretty close to each other. It's amazing exactly
Speaker 1: east and west of each other.
Speaker 0: Look at here. There's Gibbon. East and west of each other. Look at here. There's Gibeon.
There comes our moving sun. And there's our moon down over here in the valley of Agilon. But Joshua knew exactly what areas of the earth they were over. And that's what the bible says. Can we keep going?
Yeah. I can prove it. Here we go. Let's get let's let's go on. I got more illustrations.
I'm going through them. The sun doesn't go down. We talked about that. It says to go or come. Now there's Gibeon.
There it is again. Goodness, I must have doubled up some slides here, Rags. Here we go. We're getting through. Of course, these crepuscular rays, these type of rays coming down shows the sun is not far away.
I can't even get into that right now. Alright. I've covered this. The Bible says the sun moves in a circuit. To the ends of the earth, there's nothing hid from the heat thereof.
There's your circuit, means course or path. Here's the Hebrew word for circuit there, a revolution that is the sun's course circuit. Here's another thing that's impossible in their model, and I'm trying to go quick y'all, but it's it's it's a lot. The sun, he says here Ecclesiastes, the sun arises. And that word arise just simply means it's not elevation.
It means the rays begin to shoot forth when it when it comes close to us. And then he says, the sun goeth down. Again, that's the word bow that just means to come and go. It doesn't mean to go up and down. And he says that the sun, though, hasteth to his place where he arose.
Meaning goes back to the same place. How is that possible in a heliocentric universe? How can the sun they say the sun's moving through this universe. Just ever expanding. How can it ever return to the place it was before?
Doesn't do it. Either the Bible's true or your your your secular heliocentric Copernican cosmology is true. They can't both be true. Here's an interesting document I found from one of Russia's top scientists that we stole from them during the Cold War, AA Orlov, his family was highly awarded decorated scientists in Russia, and we stole this from him, and this is in declassified now. And he's talking about lunar solar disturbances in motion of artificial earth satellites, and he says this here.
It is assumed that the sun moves along a circle near the center of a planet satellite system of the masses, he says an analysis is made of the motion of the satellites characterized any eccentricity, he says, an inclination of its orbit relation to the plane of the sun's motion. He says the sun's motion. He says the he says the sun is moving in a circle. This is a Russian scientist in a top secret document. Says the sun is moving, has motion, and it moves in a circle.
Ain't that amazing that god said in Psalm 19, the sun moves in a circle? Now, the shape of the earth. I know we're hey, pastor. You told me we could do it 6 hours, so I'm trying. I'm trying but I have to get it all in.
Alright? Now this is the shape of the earth. Now, of course, everybody knows my book is entitled like clay under the seal from this this verse in Job 3814. Now I know he's gonna try to attack that, so I'm gonna deal with this. I'm gonna just destroy any possible attack on it.
Because number 1, the context of Job 38 is creation. Many bible scholars, translators have translated that this is talking about the earth being or taking shape like clay into the seal. But I'm gonna give you some other witnesses from scripture that this is exactly how God made the earth or shaped the earth. But here's a few verses. We'll look at them.
Here's the King James. It says it is turned talking about the earth, is turned. He's not talking about spinning because he said it means change. That that Hebrew word means change like you would change a potato into mashed potatoes. Right?
Or like a person who was clean, the word is used when they got leprosy, it says they their skin changed. Okay? So it's not saying spinning. He says it's turned or change as clay to the seal or the signet ring. And so clay was a glump of clay or seal, and they would press it down with a signet ring.
Alright. So that gives you a flat surface with upturned edges there. The complete Jewish bible. Anybody think the Jews know how to translate their own Hebrew scriptures. I would think the Hebrews would know that no Hebrew would get us the Hebrew correct.
Okay? So here's the complete Jewish Bible. Says, then the earth is changed like clay under the seal. So they even got it in there. And then, of course, the Amplified Bible says the earth is changed like clay into which the seal is pressed.
The NIV says the earth is takes shape like clay under the seat. So there you have all these several different translations and you have the the definition of the words which I could go into. Now here's the verses that confirm this because the Bible says in the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses, let every word be established. Amen? So this idea of the Earth taking shape like clay under a signet ring or seal being pressed down flat, this image is also what we get in other verses about creation, but you have to look up the Hebrew words.
Gonna give it to you here. So Isaiah 42:5 says this, thus saith god, the lord Yahweh, Jehovah, that created the heavens and stretch them out. Notice it says he that spread forth the earth and that which cometh out of it, he that giveth breath unto the people upon it and spirit to them that walk therein. When he says he that spread it out, just remember that. He spread forth the earth.
Another scripture, Isaiah 44/24, thus saith the lord thy redeemer. He that formed thee from the wound. I am the lord that maketh all things, that stretcheth forth the heavens alone, that spreadeth abroad the earth. Again, he says that term. Now I know it says by myself.
I'm a show you a mistake that King James makes here. He says, who stretches out the earth by himself. Do you know I can read a little Hebrew? And you know what? And I've got my Hebrew scholar here.
One of them are doctor John so get it right there. PhD from Fuller Theological Seminary, he'll tell you this too. This right here, when it says he spreadeth abroad the earth in Isaiah 44, by myself, is not in the original. It's etmaim in Hebrew. Et mayim means upon or in relation to the waters.
Mayim is the waters of creation. So he's saying that he spread the earth in relation to the waters just like he says in Genesis 1. Let's keep going. He says, and then there's Psalm 1366. It says, to him that stretches out the earth above the waters, for his mercy endures forever.
So let's look at this term spreadeth out. Because 3 times here, he says he spreads out the earth. Meaning, telling you, this is how I did it. Like, if a woman's rolling out some dough, she says I spread out the dough, but how does she do it? Right?
She's gonna tell you how he did it. Right here is the word. It's that word again, raka, where we get the word rakia from. But the word rock of the verb where he spread out the earth, this is what it means. Look at this.
Brown driver, Briggs' lexicon, also the Strongs, beat somebody say, stamp. Stand. Spread out. Spread out. Press down.
Y'all see it? Yeah. Stamp. Stamp is just another term for, guess what, a seal. But he uses the term stamped, pressed down.
So literally, you could read those verses, if you backed up to those verses, that he stamped forth the earth that he pressed it down. This is the same picture, so 3 times you have this. There it is. To beat, to stamp, to beat out, to spread out. Guess what?
You can buy these. They're called stamp kits. You see it? Go ahead and put it back up there. Stamp.
What's the definition of stamp? Bring down 1's foot upon heavily on the ground or on something on the ground. He stamped his foot in frustration. Impress a pattern or mark, wax stamp kit. There it is right there.
That's what the word stamp means. So we have those verses. Now I'm gonna end I'll hopefully, we'll end on this. But here here's if you want confirmation from the New Testament. I was getting prepared to do a a message on the marriage supper of the lamb.
I wasn't even studying creation or cosmology. And I was reading this, and I've read it many times out of the King James Version. It says, when the 1000 years were expired this is Revelation 27 through 9. When the 1000 years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and she'll go he shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the 4 quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, together them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and they compass the camp of the saints about and the blood city of fire came down from god from heaven and devoured them.
So this is talking about the last rebellion after the 1000 year millennial reign. Now notice he's he uses the term the breadth of the earth here. Now now it's what hit me. The Holy Spirit hit me. And I'm reading this, and I'm like, he could've just said that they came out upon the earth.
No need to put the breadth of the earth there. Right? It's actually like an added word. I'm like, why is that even there? And I'd never looked it up.
In all my 36 years of studying the Bible, I never looked it up. So I looked it up. Start looking up these Hebrew and Greek words. It gets dangerous because the word breadth here is the word plateaus. Sound familiar?
Plateaus. What are plateaus? They're a flat land. Right? Well, the word the root and then notice in in your Greek dictionary, gonna it's gonna lead you down the root words.
And it says the word here is plateaus, which means width or breadth. Plateaus, we know what it means. He says it's from, though, 4116 in your Greek dictionary. So let's go to 4116, which is the well, the root word, plateaus. Plateaus.
What does plateaus mean in the Strong's Greek dictionary? To spread out flat. So literally, the verse in Revelation 20 said they went up upon the flat earth. That's the definition of the words in the original language. Here's where it gets even crazy.
Notice it says that that plateaus has a root word. Plateaus says it comes from 4111. Right? So let's go to 4111 and see what it says. Here's the the the word four one one.
Here's the word in Greek. Listen to what it means here. Plasso to form, mold something from clay or wax. Literally, the potter fabricates or shapes something from clay or wax that's flat. That's that word, the breadth of the earth.
This is why you have to study the bible deeper than many of us have over the years. Amen. We lose so much understanding when we don't go back to the original Hebrew and Greek and even sometimes to the verb tenses of the the Greek language, And there there are 3 together. And I'm gonna just end with this part. I'm not gonna show you, but there have been 2 astronauts that were interviewed, 1, the general highly decorated Mishloff Hermanniski who'd recently died.
He was the only Polish cosmonaut for the Soviet Union. He was asked in an interview right here. You've been there. Is the earth really a sphere a sphere hanging in outer space? And his answer was, the earth is flat as some may expect.
I didn't expect this question. I assure you it's flat. And there was another Russian cosmonaut who was awarded to be the hero of the Soviet Union. He said we haven't been to space. If someone claims that we have been, it's not true.
It's not the truth. These are 2 astronauts. I believe in the days ahead these are whistleblowers. I believe in the days ahead, we're gonna have more whistleblowers that come out and tell the truth. Well, folks, I have given you the witness of scripture, the witness of scientists, astronauts but even those don't matter.
The word of God is clear. God made the earth still and it rests immovable, stable upon pillars, upon a foundation. And in God's creation, there is an up and a down. Jesus ascended up. Where is that?
Where is up for the poor Australians? Heaven is up. Hell is down. That is a simple concept. Doesn't work on a spinning water ball.
Alright. But God said he made the earth with a firmament over it, and it's a solid crystalline, molten glass dome. And his throne sits upon it. And he says over and over, the earth is shaped like clay under a seal. It's the breadth of the earth, the flat earth.
It's motionless. This is what God describes in the scriptures. And this is why many atheists have got save when they've seen the evidence. So I rest my case. God bless
Speaker 1: Thank you, pastor Dean. Thank you. That's good. Give him a hand. Not everybody wants to
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
They put it right. in. front. of. your. face. 🥞 https://t.co/0SEG6wkdGD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 believes that the Earth is a pancake and dismisses evidence of it being round. Speaker 0 questions this belief, mentioning photos and the phenomenon of day and night. Speaker 1 argues that the sun acts like a spotlight, shining on one place at a time. Speaker 0 counters by asking why water doesn't spill off the edges if the Earth is a pancake. Speaker 1 claims there is a butter wall that keeps the water in place. Speaker 0 finds this absurd and compares it to fake things like the abominable snowman. Speaker 1 corrects Speaker 0, stating that global warming is real. Speaker 0 concedes that they may have been wrong.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait. Beast Boy, you don't believe the Earth is round?
Speaker 1: Mhmm. That's right. The Earth ain't round. It's a big old pancake. Your laughter only makes my beliefs stronger.
When did you become so dumb? I ain't dumb. I'm a free thinker.
Speaker 0: If you believe the Earth is a pancake, then what about the thousands of photos that clearly shows the Earth is round, like a basketball?
Speaker 1: Things all fake. Okay. If the Earth is a pancake, then how do we get both day and night? Because the sun is like a spotlight, and it moves The round's shining on 1 place at a time. Okay, crazy.
But if the Earth is a pancake, why does not the water spill off the edges? Yeah. Water would spill right off into space.
Speaker 0: Explain that, Mr. Pan. Take Earth's time.
Speaker 1: Two words. Butter wall. Butter
Speaker 0: wall. Seriously? A butter wall?
Speaker 1: That's what I said, fool. There's a big old butter wall encircles the entire pancake earth. The butter wall keeps the watering. Now you're catching on. You're beginning to see how reality really be.
Speaker 0: This whole pancaker thing is just a fake, like the abominable snowman or global warming.
Speaker 1: Actually, Julie Robin, global warming is real. Don't make me smack you.
Speaker 0: Okay. Fine. Maybe I was wrong.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
International airline pilot says earth is flat af https://t.co/R4TMK0Gzv9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I quit my job as an international airline pilot due to vaccine mandates. Although I didn't want to take the vaccine, my family did, and unfortunately, my mother passed away from it. After quitting, I learned about the Flat Earth theory from a fellow pilot. Initially, I thought it was ridiculous, but as I researched more, I found it aligning with other conspiracy theories I believe in. As someone who flew all over the world, I can confidently say that nothing in my training or experience supports the idea of a globe Earth. Additionally, I discovered that NASA's ISS tracking website can be manipulated by changing the time on your device, which proves their deception. I encourage others to record and share this evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. So guys, just wanted to touch on, I've been an airline pilot, international airline pilot for 15 years. I quit due to the, vaccine mandates. And, since quitting Sorry. Say again.
No. I said it's right on. Sorry. Yeah. Sorry.
So I didn't wanna take the vaccine. Unfortunately, The rest of my family, you know, took it. My mother passed away from it. So that's a separate story. But anyway, since quitting in my mid thirties.
I've come to know about Flat Earth. It it came to me because a friend of mine, also an airline pilot, joked around, and said, hey, you'd probably be one to believe flat Earth, and I thought, that's ridiculous. There's there's no chance it's flat. And then because I started looking and I saw the types of conspiracy theories that I normally, research and align with, it was coming up time and time again from people I trusted on on the sort of conspiracy front, and Damn. It's it's true.
And, you know, I've I've been a flat earther for about a year, and and, you know, as an airline pilot that flew all over the world, I can tell you for a fact, that there's nothing in in in my training, in my textbooks, in anything that we do as a operation and I'm talking I used to fly 16 hours straight, across the Pacific Ocean there's nothing in that that aligns with the earth being a globe. Now, just one thing I wanted to touch on that no one seems to bring up, and I'm sure Some of you might be aware of it. If you go to the ISS, tracking website on NASA and let's say it shows its current position Sichuan over Africa, all you have to do is change the time on your computer or your phone 1 hour ahead, 1 hour behind, whatever you want, refresh and then the position of the ISS will change. Okay. So this is how pathetic NASA is managing this scam.
Okay? I've I've recorded it. You know, anyone, I I implore you to to record it yourselves and put it out there on whatever social media you can because that's just a direct evidence that this is a total scam.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Is the earth flat or round? https://t.co/OU0hzWRD8u
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss whether the Earth is flat or round. Speaker 1 argues that it's not okay to say the Earth is flat, citing pictures from space as evidence. Speaker 2 mentions video footage of a rotating spherical Earth. Speaker 3 makes a random comment about robot polishers. Speaker 1 explains that if you observe a boat on a lake, it gradually disappears over the curved horizon, which wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. Speaker 4 defines science and mentions an experiment by Eratosthenes to determine if the Earth's surface is curved. They discuss the scientific process and the difference between pseudoscience and regular science. Speaker 5 mentions Einstein's explanation of gravity and the possibility of better models in the future. They also touch on the use of light to understand the composition of things. Speaker 7 talks about the conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry. Speaker 8 briefly mentions evidence suggesting the Earth's surface is either flat or much larger than believed. The video ends with a comment about academia's role in seeking truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the Earth flat or round?
Speaker 1: It's not okay to say that the Earth is flat. It's not okay. We've taken all these amazing pictures from space. They're they're so beautiful.
Speaker 0: All the Pictures from space. Those pictures are not fake.
Speaker 2: We have video of the rotating spherical Earth.
Speaker 1: So I don't really know what's going on right now with this earth is flat thing.
Speaker 3: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 2: One of
Speaker 1: the things you can see yourself, if you actually go out to a lake and there are boats on that lake
Speaker 0: See the bottom of the ship is gone. Now we can see midway Yep. And then
Speaker 2: No longer visible beyond your horizon.
Speaker 1: And that's because the boat is actually going over the horizon that's Curved. That wouldn't happen if the Earth were The boat goes farther and farther away. The last thing we will see is the very top of the mast of that boat. And that's because the boat is actually going over the horizon that's curved. And that means that as it goes farther and farther away, you see less and less of the bottom of it and more of the top of that.
Speaker 0: Make a drop.
Speaker 1: That That wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. You would simply see the boat getting smaller and smaller and smaller as it went farther away, but you'd be able to see the whole thing with the same proportions. That wouldn't happen if the earth were flat. That wouldn't happen if the earth were flat.
Speaker 0: So the process of testing claims, world is flat, the world is round, is what we call
Speaker 4: Science. What is science?
Speaker 2: It's a famous experiment conducted by Eratosthenes. Tosthenes. Eratosthenes.
Speaker 1: And Eratosthenes noticed that there a town called Syene. And on a certain date, the sun would actually shine straight down to the bottom of a well. That meant the Sun was directly overhead. You could look down a well and see the sun shining back at you. And on the very same date farther away in the city of Alexandria, That didn't happen.
Speaker 2: How can we use this observation to see if earth's surface is curved? We need another well. Turns out, we can't see the bottom of Both wells at the same time. What might explain this? Well, there are 2 possible explanations.
First, we could have a flat earth with the sun that's small and close by so that the light hits the 2nd well at an angle. Or second, we could have a curved earth with a sun that's big and far away so that all the light comes in parallel with a sun that's big and far away so that all the light comes in parallel so that all the light comes in parallel.
Speaker 4: In science, we always say that you make observations, you have a theory, You can go make more observations, and it's a very, very tedious process. Wrong. Nobody that I know of in my field method. In our field, it's by the seat of your pants. It's leaps of logic.
It's guesswork.
Speaker 0: If you have a claim that can't be tested, that's what we call it, SOLOScience.
Speaker 5: He didn't know what gravity was. Einstein gave a better explanation. We're probably gonna get a better model later.
Speaker 3: We're probably gonna Get a better model later.
Speaker 5: We're looking at light, and we are understanding about the materials. Right. We're understanding the composition of things based on light. We're understanding the composition of things based on light.
Speaker 3: We're understanding the composition of things based
Speaker 0: The difference between pseudoscience and regular science is whether or not you can test it.
Speaker 2: No. The TED Observer. It's too far away. It's to be theoretical.
Speaker 1: Is gravity.
Speaker 2: We have no idea. Okay. Next question.
Speaker 4: You cannot reproduce the big bang, but you can then trace the history of of what happened afterwards like a murder mystery, and that's where a lot of science is done.
Speaker 6: All the
Speaker 4: things that were once considered science fiction are now centerpiece in our understanding of the nature of everything.
Speaker 2: The whole science
Speaker 6: Tesla had something to say about those guys. He said today's Scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
Speaker 2: Science and science
Speaker 7: Science delusion is the uncritical belief in these dogmas, treating them not as beliefs, but as truths. It's The conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry, which is about finding out what we don't know through systematic inquiry, the experimental method, hypothesis and so on.
Speaker 8: Purical evidence tells us that either the surface of the Earth is a flat plane or the planet is at Least 100 times bigger than we are told.
Speaker 0: Science.
Speaker 3: And not everybody can be a robot polisher. Feel that academia As the hold of truth plays an essential role, particularly today.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the debate between gaytheists and flat earthers, perspectives clash. Gaytheists envision traveling to a distant luminary, while flat earthers believe we reside at the center of creation, dismissing the notion of physical celestial bodies. The contrasting beliefs provoke laughter and disbelief.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Gaytheists think it’s possible to travel to a little luminary in the sky and look back at our insignificant little speck of dust… Flat earthers know we exist at the center of all observable creation and just laugh at those that have been psyopped into believing those tiny little lights are physical places at all…
Video Transcript AI Summary
No matter how much you want to believe, no amount of camera focusing can make a bright pulsating luminary in the night sky look like the CGI planets shown by NASA. Dusty rocks don't magically transform into shimmering lights when out of focus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It doesn't matter how bad you wanna believe. No amount of camera focusing will ever make this bright pulsating luminary crossing the night sky turn into the laughable CGI planets we're presented with from NASA. You don't need to be a theoretical astrophysicist to understand that dusty rocks do not magically turn in to shimmering lights when out of focus.
reSee.it AI Summary
The flat earth theory is a deceptive tactic that challenges centuries of unanimous belief. Those who fall for it often reject vaccinations, support pro-life views, and believe in God. They also tend to deny climate emergencies, overpopulation concerns, and oppose war in Ukraine. Flat earthers are remarkably united against the new world order, making this "psyop" a clever manipulation.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Flat earth is a nefarious “psyop” that tricks people into believing something that every single civilization throughout time had unanimously agreed on before a few hundred years ago. The ones who fall for it all become unvaccinated pro-life believers in God! None of them even believe in a “climate emergency”, overpopulation, or support war in Ukraine! You definitely won’t find a single group of people on this spinning ball we’re on more united against the new world order than flat earthers. What a brilliant “psyop” 🫡
reSee.it AI Summary
In order to maintain a lie, the State must shield people from its consequences. Repressing dissent becomes crucial as truth is the lie's mortal enemy, making it the State's greatest adversary.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various topics, including the moon being visible during the day, the vastness of the universe, the power of repetition, and the importance of critical thinking. They touch on the influence of early education and the danger of holding onto false beliefs. They emphasize the need to control one's mind and the role of academia in seeking objective truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Man, it is hella cool when, like, the moon is out during the day. Like, how does that even work?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: When you think about it, the stars are still there, and, like, they just keep going, you know? They go on for, like, forever, like, forever, ever. Forever, ever? Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's like Joe Rogan says,
Speaker 1: we're just talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe.
Speaker 3: If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic, and or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all of its powers to repress dissent for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie And thus, by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.
Speaker 2: No one likes to be wrong, especially ignorant people. No one wants to figure out that their understanding of the world is flawed or foolish. That's why narrow minded people display an unrelenting loyalty to their opinion.
Speaker 3: It starts super early.
Speaker 2: One of the first things we're taught as a baby, as a toddler The
Speaker 1: earth is
Speaker 3: round, and they just pound it into you.
Speaker 2: And And most of us go through our lives without ever doubting this assertion. What you learned in kindergarten? It generally goes unchallenged as an Seash fact rather than a debatable claim.
Speaker 3: Kindergarten. The broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional the been consciously or voluntarily, and thus, in the primitive simplicity of their minds, they're more readily fall victims to the big lie Then the small lie. Since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters, but would be ashamed this to large scale falsehoods, it would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts, which prove this to be so, may be brought clearly to their minds, They will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the universe, Black holes, the big bang, time travel, God. But what I'm gonna do is teach you how to think, train your mind. In the old days, we called it brainwashing where you repeat something and then it becomes true. That's hijacking this feature of our evolutionary brain. So you you try to sift through what is true, and it must be that which was repeated often enough.
You are comfortable in your ignorance, and you don't even know your ignorance because You came to it from from having learned, but only up to a point. They're not only controlling the information you seed, you're shaping how you receive it, which has an effect on how you then behave. How you create a worldview, you You create an understanding of how things are either because someone convinced you or you convinced yourself. Now there's a gap Or there's some information that conflicts with it. So you're gonna say if you cherish this worldview, That information that conflicts with it was falsified, or that was wrong.
They don't know what they're doing. You can maintain your worldview.
Speaker 2: If we hold on Like, you know, I spent so many years learning something, and now the world has changed.
Speaker 1: The interesting thing about an objective truth is that it's True no matter what. Imagine that.
Speaker 3: People need to understand to control their mind. Otherwise, other people will Control it forever.
Speaker 1: When you have no foundation in objective reality, it can it can be dangerous. If your personal belief system does not have correspondence in objective reality. That's an unhealthy situation for civilization to be. Not everybody can be a robot polisher. We feel that academia, As the holder of truth plays an essential role, particularly today.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Blood Sacrifice for McDonald’s
Video Transcript AI Summary
Summary: The video features Rabbi A B Finkelstein and other speakers discussing conspiracy theories and promoting anti-Semitic beliefs. They assert that Jews control various aspects of society, including the media, finance, and politics. They claim Jewish involvement in historical events such as the Bolshevik Revolution and accuse Jews of stealing children for Passover rituals. The speakers express a lack of concern for non-Jews and promote the idea of Jewish superiority. They also make derogatory remarks about black Jews and Elizabeth Taylor. The conversation is filled with hate speech and false information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a guest by the name of Rabbi A. B. Finkelstein. He is from the East Coast of the United States who is going to be Joining me tonight, Rabbi Abi Finkelstein, as I said, a rabbi off the East Coast of the United States. Are you there with me tonight?
Shalom. I am here. There's a lot of rumors and conjecture that's taking place across this country relating to the Jewish population, okay? Okay. The masses have a hard time believing anything.
Speaker 1: Well, we've done a great paint washing job on them over the centuries And especially the last few 100 years, we've just made our sin completely. They believe anything we tell them. And, you know, in the mean We have a lot of fun around Passover where we steal the children. I mean, we steal a 100 to 300000 children a year just here in this country, And we drain the blood, and we mix it with the Passover bread, and then we throw the bodies into the slaughterhouses that we own, And we grind up all the bodies and the sausage and the hamburger. McDonald's is one of our favorite outlets.
And, the people, they eat them for breakfast. They eat their Sheldon for lunch. And, you know, as Jews, you know, we gotta, we gotta do what we do. It's overthinking white base. So that's why I'm speaking so honestly here, because laying it out into the open so that you can see it for what it is.
You've been teaching, the people real good, but they don't wake up, do they? Because you know why? They're scared of us Jews Because they don't wanna be called anti Semites, and they believe that we're the chosen people. And so that's why, We can do whatever we want to do and we can get away with it because the white men are cowards and we go to the synagogue all the time and have Samantha Shevinson danced the Habakkila.
Speaker 0: It's not that you Jews are hiding anything. You're coming right out on television, in the newspapers, On the radio, and you're telling the people exactly what you're gonna do before you do it, and they're, like, they're brain dead.
Speaker 1: Well, we did a good job with the public school system. We got you to put all of your children in there. You notice that the Jew doesn't put his children in there. They go to the Hebrew Academy Well, we teach them the real things, and then they go to the synagogue and they learn the real important things, but we send your kids To the public school, we even have you tax yourself from your property so that you never own your property. And, So if you don't make your property tax, we're gonna take your property, you can bet on that.
And we have you put your kid in a 12 year, babysitting is about all it does because you don't learn anything. And then by that time, the kids, they get to be teenagers, And then, we give them the music, not that we really wanna call it music because, oy vey, that's not music, but they listen to that, and then they wanna do what They wanna do, and so we sell them drugs and, we make a lot of money off your children. Your children from cradle to grave. All we do is make money off of them. Your cattle, your golem, the human cattle, muzzle tock.
Speaker 0: Well, that's very interesting. I I know that, on your Passover, which isn't mine, that a lot of little children do Peter, and I I I do know that, and I know of a lot of police, police departments and agencies have been informed, but you're very open. You're very open tonight. I'm very surprised that you're talking about the bloodletting of the little children that you put their blood in the matzah balls and that you eat it On sacrifice on Passover.
Speaker 1: Well, there was a client that wrote a book about it back in the thirties. I forget his name at the moment. But anyway, he wrote the book. People didn't buy the book. People don't wanna listen.
We've been doing this for 1,000 and 1,000 of years since down to, Adam's time. We take the children of, our enemy, which is the white lace, and, we bring them to the basements in the synagogues where we, drain the blood And, watch them die there. It's very similar to how we do, The sacrifices that we do with the, kosher butchering, and, so we do that, and then, we mix it with the Passover bread, And so we eat the blood of our enemies. And the bodies, we're not cannibals. So what we do is we take those because we can make some shekels And we give them to the slaughterhouses, and those are pounds and pounds and pounds of meat that we grind up in the sausage and the hamburger, And that's why we made those the most popular things, sausage for breakfast and hamburger for lunch.
And so all the They are really eating the children. And, even when we say this outright and tell you people you don't believe it. So that's that's your problem. But you, call them out there. You never you never teach yourself.
You don't self teach. You're always looking for somebody else to do it for you. So, you wind up being schleppers all your life.
Speaker 0: I'd like to welcome you to John 844. I'm James Wickstrom, A Teacher of Yahweh, coming to you live On the Turner Radio Network for the next hour from 9 to 10 pm Eastern Standard Time, filling in for pastor Bob who covered for me last week. We're going to have a very, very interesting program tonight. I'm sure you're going to find it that way. I have a guest by the name of Rabbi A.
B. Finkelstein. He's off the East Coast of the United States who's going to be joining me tonight and we're going to be talking about Authenticity of Things in the World. Rabbi Abi Finkelstein, as I said, a rabbi off the East Coast of the United States. Are you there with me tonight?
Speaker 1: Shalom. I am here. Hey. Listen. I
Speaker 0: I wanna I'm filling in here for pastor Bob tonight, And I know, we've never met, but I do have some very interesting questions for you. I think questions that I want to give You want the opportunity to answer to because there's a lot of rumors and conjecture that's taking place across this country Relating to the Jewish population. Okay? Okay. Now you see, As as being off the synagogue and a teacher of the Jewish race because you you are a race, aren't you?
Speaker 1: Well, some say we're a race. Some say we
Speaker 0: are a religion. Yeah. Well, what do you say?
Speaker 1: We're on the beach.
Speaker 0: I can imagine. Yeah. Now I wanna get into some hard topic here right away here. You know, you're a very pronounced person among your own people. And, of course, you know, you're very aware that I don't like you or your race.
Okay? I'm sure you're aware of This right?
Speaker 1: That's no problem.
Speaker 0: You see, there's a big topic that's going around on this 6,000,000 holocaust that took place During World War 2 of the Jews, at at Buchenwald, Auschwitz, and different places, A lot of information has coming out here, Rabbi Finkelstein, that that it's all myth and it's all conjecture.
Speaker 1: Could I
Speaker 0: have could I have your on this.
Speaker 1: Well, everybody knows that the Jews never told a lie in the history of the world. However, whether it's 6,000,000 or 600,000 or 60,000, it's just a number. Oh, it's just it's just a number, but But the thing that I wanna get you at is that, you
Speaker 0: know, the 1934 World Encyclopedia stated that there was only 3 and a half 1000000 Jews in all of Europe. How did 3 and a half 1000000 Jews populate themselves to 6,000,000? This is the question I want I I'd like answered.
Speaker 1: Well, it's a it's certainly a good question. There's no doubt about it. But the number, you know, numbers what can I say about numbers? The the important thing is that Jews have always been persecuted
Speaker 0: Well, the reason they're persecuted is because they're thieves, liars, and murderers just like, It's stated in the book of John 844. Yet you're
Speaker 1: need bible stuff.
Speaker 0: You're you're a lying Jew is what you are. You're a lying Jew.
Speaker 1: You could say that. But even when we lie, we tell the truth.
Speaker 0: You know, this is very ironic because, You know, I never thought that I would get anyone that had the nerve to join me on a broadcast like this live. And and, you know, I just got off a program with a retired colonel, A very highly decorated colonel on my last broadcast, my original broadcast here, Rabbi Finkelstein, And we got into the banking aspect of the money in this country. Now everybody, a lot of people who have studied banking and economics, They know that the Federal Reserve Banking Corporation is a private Jewish bank. Is this true?
Speaker 1: Well, yes and no. Well, what part is yes? Well, it's a banking institution. That's for sure.
Speaker 0: You see, the thing that I don't like about this is that The Jews never knew what hard work was and they never had. And besides, you know, this is the nice part about it. You Jews are just Christ murders anyway.
Speaker 1: Well, that's that's true. We didn't might have him, but he was Jewish too.
Speaker 0: No. He was almighty Yahweh God in the flesh Bobby, that's the problem you got.
Speaker 1: Well, we tell all the Goyens that they worship a Jew and they believe it, so what's the difference?
Speaker 0: And and now that you brought up the goyim, let's talk about that. In other words, the goyim correct me if I'm wrong. I know you will. Rabbi Finkelstein, a goyim is any person who isn't a Jew, a goyim is classified as Cattle or an animal. Is this correct?
Speaker 1: Well, we are cattle because we're the chosen people.
Speaker 0: Well, yeah, you're chosen for fertilizer. That's what you're chosen for. You know, this is what the book of Enoch the patriarch, even Yahweh in a flesh body, said that All of you all of you Jews all of you Jews, the descendants of Cain, are gonna perish for the evil that you have done in this world. You are the destroyers and the incineraries of the world, are you not?
Speaker 1: I'll agree with that.
Speaker 0: But you see the thing that really bothers me and not bothers me to the extent of losing sleep over people like you Is that all wars have been created by jewelry. They've been all set up to as a monetary gain. Wouldn't you agree?
Speaker 1: It's it's the gayest game in the world to make some chuckles.
Speaker 0: No. No. Let me let me ask you this. You know, there's so much things being talked about with George Bush in the White House. Let me have your opinion, first of all, about George Bush in the White House.
Speaker 1: He's a good goyim.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, he's a good goyim. Yeah. Good for
Speaker 1: good boy. He takes his orders from Ariel over there,
Speaker 0: And he tells them what to do, and he does it like I said to him. Would you would you would you agree that, When the Bell Ford Declaration was signed in England and the Jews Were taken to Palestine, the land of Palestine. Would you agree or disagree that there's actually more killing And there's been as much slaughter in Palestine by the Jews slaughtering and killing the Palestinians As there are of the Iraqi people being butchered in the last 12 years.
Speaker 1: Well, who counts? But once in a while, you gotta thin out the fight. When you own the fight, you gotta thin out the
Speaker 0: Staying alive and staying ahead. Is this right? Now I'd like to
Speaker 1: Well, you think you think that Iraq business over there. We we got We got the white Goyam fighting the Arab Goyam, and they're killing each other, and we're making a lot of money, and we get the oil, and we get the interest. The most important thing is the interest on all
Speaker 0: the shekels that we want on both sides. You mean usury?
Speaker 1: That's right. You call it usually.
Speaker 0: Now, you know, there's a book out that you read, Rabbi Finkelstein, called the Talmud. Now the Talmud refers to Christ as his mother was a whore and and, He was a bastardized son of a Roman soldier. Is is this what's being taught in the synagogues?
Speaker 1: Oh, let me get you know that.
Speaker 0: But you see the reason that I wanted to to ask you this is that, you know, you just said a little while ago that he was a Jew. And now you say every Jew knows that he was the son of a Roman soldier and that his mother was a prostitute.
Speaker 1: Well, that was a long time ago. Who knows what was said back then?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I guess that's right. That's absolutely right. You know, we're having a real bad problem in our country right now. There's a lot of outsourcing of jobs and deindustrialization of this country.
You know, The the the 7 Jew banking families that took over control of the money in America in 1913 was the Rothschilds Of London, Israel's ship of Italy, Kuehne and Loeb of Germany, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Lehman Brothers of New York, Fellas of of New York, a lot of people, they they don't realize and know that these 7 Jewish families Actually, control all the money and have control the money in this country since 1913. I know you're aware of this. Now in doing so, I mean, that makes a pretty big purse, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Listen. You know, it the the golem are the slippers. You know? They they do all the work Good. That's what they wanna do.
They wanna work. They always want jobs, so we give
Speaker 0: them jobs to work. The Jews don't work. No. Jews don't work, and you're absolutely true. I wanna get back to this Holocaust, and I wanna get back to the Holocaust survivors.
You know? It's to the point here, Rabbi Finkelstein, where there's more Holocaust survivors getting, getting money, getting payments, financial payments, then there were Holocaust people who died, allegedly among the Jews. Where where did all these
Speaker 1: people come from? Well, again, you know, they have the evidence. They have the proof that they were there in the Holocaust, and so they're entitled to some money. So in
Speaker 0: other words, they you Jews say 6,000,000 were killed in the concentration camps, and yet there's almost 6,000,000 That, are are still receiving funds from, Germany and, other funding And and that's 12,000,000. Now how does 12,000,000 come out of 3,000,000?
Speaker 1: Listen, again, the numbers, you know, you keep arguing about the numbers. The bottom line is that the Jews are entitled because we've been persecuted for 1,000 and 1,000 and thousands of years, and so we're entitled. Even a 100 years from now, there'll be people collecting money on the Holocaust Because of those that lousy boy Hitler over there, he was a bad boy. Now let me ask you a question about this because
Speaker 0: this is very important. You know, we've gotten into a little, a lot of very interesting information. We're gonna get into more here in the very near future. But Rabbi Finkelstein, this country, the United States of America, is in real deep trouble right now financially, and I kind of want to know what you're what you're telling the other Jews in that, in regards to because I know Jews don't have Any loyalty to nothing but gold and silver, especially gold. What what what are the what are the synagogues teaching the Jews in America today As to the course of where this country is heading
Speaker 1: Well, it's like this. You know, America, it served its papers We've made a lot of shekels here. We've made a lot of interest off the shekels, but we can get cheaper labor in China. We can get cheaper labor in India. Why should we pay the white guys, Graham here in America, any money when we can make a better deal over there?
It's all about shekels.
Speaker 0: You know, I wanna get into that about shekels and interest and everything. And this is very interesting that you bring it up because I noticed that there's a lot of investment by Jewish finances into Asia, most parts of Asia. Now I also know that Jewry is an Asiatic race. Is this correct?
Speaker 1: Well, we're really all over the world, but, yeah, I guess, well, you can say we started in Asia.
Speaker 0: Yes. That's that's right. Now the Hebrews did not start there, and the Israelites didn't start there. You really have no bearing to the being the Hebrews or the Israelites. You are not the dispersed nations, plural, the tribes of Jacob was surnamed Israel.
Actually, the con game that you have brought on to this country in the world for many years, And it's been a good con. It's been a good con game. Is that is that you're allegedly God's chosen people?
Speaker 1: We are God's chosen people. It's just that most Jews don't like to admit it, but our God is Lucifer.
Speaker 0: Your god is gold.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what we like is lots of gold, lots of shekels, Some, American Express cards, you know, we we like to spend. We like to have a good time. We let the golem do the work, and we have
Speaker 0: a party. Oh, and there was free foreign aid, free housing, free food, and you just let the other races be your Goyam cattle slaves. Is this correct?
Speaker 1: That's what they want, so we let them be there.
Speaker 0: And this is what's coming and planned in this country too, isn't it? The United States.
Speaker 1: Well, this country here, we're gonna brown this country up. We're we're bringing all the all the Mexicans and all the Hispanics across the border. They're in a bleeding, especially with a lot of the white women, the as we call them, and they're in a bleeding with them. Pretty soon, it won't be a white race. It'll be all around.
And and
Speaker 0: talking about race, you are a race, Rabbi But you are a Heinz 57 mongrel race Of Asiatic blood. Is this correct?
Speaker 1: Well, there's Jews everywhere in the world. We We end up with all the good looking women in every country we go into. All the good looking women, all they care about is we buy them a few diamonds, Not that they're worth anything. We marked that industry up real big. If the truth be known, we have many diamonds that if we ever lose the diamonds we have, you can buy them for the same price as a dozen noses.
But for women, they like the diamonds. They like the furze. So we give them the diamonds and the police, and and we make an appointment with them, and we have sex with them, and and sometimes we marry them. It doesn't matter because when we got want a We just go to one of our fellow Jew judges and get the divorce. We have a Jew lawyer.
She's gonna hire a Jew lawyer. She's not gonna make any shekels, But you can try.
Speaker 0: Let me ask you this. This is very interesting. This war in Iraq that took place after the alleged towers of 2000 September 11, 2001. This alleged war, it got very interesting. There were really no Jews in them towers.
Can you explain that?
Speaker 1: Well, spiritually, there were a lot of Jews in the towers. A lot of Jews died in those towers spiritually.
Speaker 0: Oh, I see. Well, there's 3,000 Jews were not at work that day in those towers. That that just give, a lot of people have the impression that The Jewish population out there in Jew York I mean, New York was, was aware that something was gonna happen and they didn't show up for work that day.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We got a call from the that, Ariel and, some of the boys in the Musa. They got together and they wired up the building, and they took them down. It was gonna be a hard thing to take them down anyway because we wanted to build some new Structures and the buildings were getting old, and it was time to bring them down. This way, we make some shekels by destroying the building.
Old Silverman, who's a good friend of mine there, Larry, he got a 2fer. He got a 2 for 1 there, and he doubled the insurance Magically, just 3 months before it happened, and then he got a 2 for hit on it. So he made, like, 4 times his money. I should have been in on the deal. He asked me, but I said, I don't know.
Let me think about it. It took a little too long for me to think about it, and he pulled the the plug. He Hold it as they say, and so the billings come down. But at least I got in on the market, and I got I shorted. I was short, American Airlines.
I was short United Airlines. I was short, Lloyd's of London Insurance Company because they took a big hit. Allianz Insurance Company, I was short of them, so I made a few chuckles.
Speaker 0: Well, let me ask you this. You know, there's a lot of speculation here. You know, I know that that the Jews are thieves and liars of any Moral society. Now I I wanna thank you for coming on tonight and talking to me because I also know that there's no conscience among
Speaker 1: Right. Well, Jews always feel guilt. We've always felt the guilt. We have a conscience.
Speaker 0: The the only conscience you have is is when you can't steal all the money from anyone or any country.
Speaker 1: Well, you're hitting a little close to home, but you're correct. On a
Speaker 0: lot of food labels, there's a u and a k. And this u and k on all food labels, for example, that are sold in supermarkets, etcetera, Is this a Jewish tax that is paid to, like, rabbis like you all over the United States? Is that is that another con job, at the expense of the golem, the masses who purchased the product.
Speaker 1: Well, I didn't get in on that 1, but, yeah, it's a lot of other rabbi groups. They, tax the food, and you could call it a tax, you know, You're entitled to make money where you can make money. If nobody stops you, you make the money. And, but, you know, the Goyam, I mean, they're the cattle. The white race out there, there's a goyam, there's a cattle.
And so, if we wanna make money off of feeding our cattle, but who's to say that that's wrong? Well, let me
Speaker 0: ask you. What's the greatest fear of the people that you have in your synagogue, Rabbi Finkelstein? What is the greatest fear That the Jewish that that the Jews in mass are facing on the East Coast.
Speaker 1: Well, the worst thing is, if we hang around, our old buddy up there, in the Federal Reserve, Alan Alan, he's gonna pull the plug on this US dollar, and we wanna make sure that we're, in the Swiss blanks and into euros or Japanese Jen, there's something, before that happens. We'll get the call from the Kehoe. We're liquidating now little by little. A couple of other Goyum That, their good, bought, and paid for Chavez Goy. The Bill Gates fellow from the, the computer place and the, the Warren Buffett, Both of them, they got out of US dollars,
Speaker 0: about, over a
Speaker 1: year ago or so. We told them, you know, the liquidation, you know, but we're still hanging on there. So we made a little extra interest since they were out of the market. They got a
Speaker 0: lot of shackles themselves. I see where, you Jews have finally taken over the National Rifle Association. A Jew is by the name of Sandra Forman is now president of the National Rifle Association.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah. But we took over the NRA a long time ago. Charlton Heston, is not known so much, but, yeah, he's a nice Jewish boy. We let him play Moses in the movies back in the fifties. We thought we took the NRA over long ago.
All the organizations out there that you control it, everybody knows that.
Speaker 0: You know, I read in your Talmud where it says that if you're to have any opposition, you will control that opposition.
Speaker 1: Well, of course, the smartest thing is to is to own both sides of every game. But you That way, you know the outcome. We own the the Republicans. We own the Democrats. We got a lot of good Jewish boys in on on both of them, And the rest of them are good bosses paid for and we throw a few shekels into their, campaign, Contributions that we give them in our Jewish Lobby in Israel and they, You know, they take the money and they they do what we want so that we can make some shekels.
If if nobody stops it, who's to say we shouldn't be doing it? If don't you wish you could do it? You're not doing it. We're doing it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But you're thieves and liars. You know, you're all thieves and liars just like it says in Saint John 844. But you see, Rabbi Finkelstein, You don't own me and you don't control me and you don't control the racial identity movement in this country Who really understands to a varying degree of what you people are and what you've done?
Speaker 1: Well, that's that's true. You're one of those guys out there that we don't control. But I'll tell you a little something else. We all respect for what you do because at least you stand up for the erase. The the rest of them out there, all a bunch of cowards, all the white lace, all the men.
The most of them these days, they carry places and they wear airings. They're they're they're, there's no wonder the white girls come to us, all the shikens.
Speaker 0: You know, I had a, a conversation here, not long ago with an individual, and I got into the the feminist homosexual agenda in the United States. And I told them that actually, the sexist homosexual agenda Was actually created and funded by by jewelry by the Jews of the United States. Well, do you wanna discuss on that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. We got that going back in the, early 1900s. The the women's rights movement we started off. See, you gotta when you gotta have a game and you gotta bigger goal, you can't go in like a Sherman tank going through something. You gotta start a little small.
And so we said, hey. How about you get equal pay for equal work, and women have the right to vote? And everybody bought into that. And we started with the women because it's hard to get the men. The women are the weakest sex as we know from That's the old Adam and Eve story I used.
But, at any rate, we got the women going. And now look at all the women. Most all of them around The world, especially here in America, they got short hair, they they got a for a boyfriend, they got a lesbian lover, they're married, by the time they're 40, but then they can't have too many, Little children themselves because they've already ruined those years chasing the almighty gold, the dollar, the shekel, And they're, so they're gonna wind up a bunch of old maids because nobody wants them. But the bottom line is that Now the real good looking ones, we take them to Hollywood that we own. Now we make them vending out as part of it.
I'm building a house.
Speaker 0: I see. Well, Rabbi Fincherstine you know, I was talking to you about the u's and the k's That's on the food boxes and the food sources. And the thing that I want is that this is a private Jewish tax that people Unsuspectedly are paying, aren't they?
Speaker 1: Well, some know, some don't, but they better pay because if they don't pay, they don't get the item. And the rabbis need to make some shekels too. You know,
Speaker 0: I was talking to a person who journeyed over to Israelite, And they, the United States has always been known as the land of milk and honey. They say over there, uh-uh. The United States is a land of milk and money. Would you like to relate to that?
Speaker 1: Well, what's in the saying? What can I say? A lot of people here in America, they still keep screaming about these 55 guys that they say form the company, The country, a couple of 100 years ago, but the bottom line is that the Jews formed the country. We came over here. 14/92 was that terrible year that we got kicked out of Spain.
And Columbus, who was a Jew, he rounded out take us over here. We're gonna set up in Rio, and then we decided to go to New York because New York has a little bit better weather, not so many mosquitoes. It was a little bit better. So we set up in New York and we make the money.
Speaker 0: I was gonna ask you, this war in Iraq, There's a lot of Jew money invested in this war, isn't there? Well, we
Speaker 1: have the, all the, ammunition companies. We have all the Emission companies, we have all the aircraft companies, all the the gun manufacturers, the, all the supplies. We're making a lot of money, and George Bush is a good guy. He borrows it right from the Federal Reserve, And then we they, they asked to tax the people to pay back the interest because the most important part of a loan is the interest. You must pay back the interest.
We're not concerned with the principal, but the interest has to keep going on. And we've done pretty well with IRAC so far. We've, got about 300,000,000,000 or so. And, but this war here is gonna go on for another 30 years. As George said, we told him to Keep it quiet and and and shut up and and don't act like a, like a a big shot, but he kept talking.
And so, but this was gonna go on for another 30 years. We're gonna go into maybe 60 countries or so. We're gonna be drafting all the golem here soon. The with the men, the women, the women, they they don't wanna sit home and have families anyway. They'd rather have a career.
That's a nice exciting thing for a woman to put on a green suit and go over there and and shoot people and get shot at. Must be exciting to them. So we're making a lot of money. You know, this
Speaker 0: is very interesting. Well, Rabbi Finkelstein, it's a really good talking to you, and I'm sure the listening audience here on the Turner Radio Network is listening very intently because A lot of things have been a little exposed, some more exposed than others. But, you know, at least you're coming out and you're telling the truth. And, you know, you state, you know, we got 300,000,000,000 tied up in Iraq with interest. And what 1700 to 3000 dead bodies compared to how much money you made.
Speaker 1: Well, but you gotta thin out the herd once in a while. Otherwise, the herds get too big. If the herds get too big, they eat up all the resources. We gotta thin out the herd once in a while. We we call it a theater of war because it's amusing to us Jews to see Our 2 biggest enemies, the white race and the Arab race, the seed of the woman, it's it's amusing to us to see them kill each other, and we make a lot of money off it.
Believe me, I've had a lot of laughs at the synagogue with that.
Speaker 0: Well, we got a break here coming up in about a minute, I believe. And, you're listening to the John eight forty four program of pastor Bob entitled The Lying Jews on the Turner Radio Network. I'm James Wickstrom, a teacher of Yahweh, and as a guest on Pastor Bob's program tonight is Rabbi Ab Finkelstein On the East Coast of the United States. We're gonna be coming back to you after this break. Just hold your chair and hold your place.
We'll be back in just One moment. I'd like to welcome you back for the second half of pastor Bob's Broadcast tonight on the Turner Radio Network on John 844. I'm James Works. I'm a teacher of Yahweh sitting in for Bob Tonight, I want to thank him for covering for me last week, a broadcast of lying Jews. Very interesting that I have 1 on here with no conscience, but he's coming up and at least Telling the truth to what's going on in the country is rabbi AB Finkelstein from the East Coast of the United States.
Rabbi Finkelstein, are you still there?
Speaker 1: I am here and remember, there's never been a Jew in the history of the world that ever told a lie. We always tell the truth.
Speaker 0: Yes. I see. I know what your truth is. Your truth to you is a lie to us, but that's that's fine. I'd like to get into the, The situation that took place years ago, I know you're well aware of it.
It it was called the Bolsheviks Revolution over in Christian Russia. It's been reported here on congressional documents in the United States and it's in many places now That actually it was Jews who financed the Bolsheviks, Jew Communist revolution Against the czar. Would you comment on that?
Speaker 1: Well, it was really the Lost Child family that financed it because they got all the shekels. Boy, let me tell you. They got the shekels. When the old man died in 18/12, he owned half of all the known wealth in the world. Oy, Hey.
The rest of us gotta chop up the rest of it. But anyway, we started the Bolshevik Revolution there Because you might as well start with taking over the biggest country in the world, which was Russia, and, we had the help, To to from his cousins, the Kaiser and, the king and queens of England And, so they, they helped us and they gave us all the inside information that we needed to, take the country over And, but we joined that country pretty well. There's not a lot left and so we look for greener pastures and We've been doing real good here in America for a long time, but it's time to do something else, so we're gonna build up China and India, And we'll just let America sink into the desert because no one really cares about America anymore. It's, You know, there's not a lot of shekels that'll be, made anymore. You know, as they say, you can't get blood out of a stone, and we've got as much blood out of this stone as we're gonna get.
You know,
Speaker 0: it's interesting because, I'm glad you brought that up because, this country is in great to spare here. I'd like to know you. That was very crafty On your kehillah and the main sources of Jewish power, financial and political power, How they totally control most of the federal agencies in the District of, Columbia.
Speaker 1: Well, it's really simple. You know, the that's the inside for us rabbis. We we know how to get the word out to every Jew in the world, that goes to a synagogue within 45 minutes. All the other pluses, The news media, the television, the radio, the magazines, we own all those anyway, so It trickles down, but by the time most of the masses get it, it's too late to make any decision. We already made the decision bottom.
Speaker 0: You know, it's interesting with trouble looming on the horizon in the United States. You know, there there's a lot of of white people, like white people like me of European ancestry who don't really know what's going on. And there's a large percentage of Jews in this country who really don't know what's going on either. They're gonna be Well, Buchanan fodder too, aren't they?
Speaker 1: There's a few at the bottom that don't go to the synagogue and they don't know, but they they They know that you have, you know, at parties we discuss it, you know, how we're gonna wipe out the white race and wipe out The database actually let them wipe out each other and make a lot of money. That's pretty smart. You know, us Jews were pretty smart guys. I knew Eventually, We'll get all the rest of the countries around the world. They'll wipe each other out because us Jews, we're special.
We're the chosen people and we're the smartest people in the world and we have always said down through the ages, we want a world of our own And we're going to get it and there's nothing any of the Goyam cattle we're going to do to stop it. Okay. So you
Speaker 0: see You see, it's very interesting that you should bring all of this up because where do the blacks fit in? I know that you use them. They've been part of the Jewish Communist Party in the United States, a majority a vast majority. What's gonna be their end when this is all over?
Speaker 1: Well, the Schwatzes, if it's just to be known, came here without father Lucifer 75,000 years ago When he lost that battle, only 10 of melody though in the heavens because we're on a comeback. We're the comeback kids if there ever was one. All the, all the, Schwozes, what what can you say? You know? They got a good time step.
They dance good. A couple of them can sing. They make some nice barbecue. And, they're real good for selling drugs too, because they all love the drugs. And we make a lot of money off of selling the drugs.
You do know that we control all the drug world And have since Rothschild, got the, opium wars in China going, we've been controlling the drugs ever since then. We've had a few in here And they are to make some money and they they get arrested and they go off to jail for that, but we make the big money. We're the wholesalers we're the wholesalers of everything in the world.
Speaker 0: You know, it's very interesting you should bring that up because, you know, prior to Franklin Delano Roosevelt And his, Eleanor, his first cousin, who is also a Jewess, Actually, yes, they were both Jews. And it's very interesting until they got in office, The Jews had control of the money, but they didn't have control or a good foothold in Washington DC, did they?
Speaker 1: No. We we had control since the Civil War. The the Rothschild, he backed both sides of the Civil War and when The smoke cleared. He was getting shekels for both of them. Lots of interest.
They are never going to be able to pay back the war debt. We really controlled them. Basically What we've been doing is consolidating. I'll tell you something about that. The Illinois girl, she got a face
Speaker 0: that would stop a clock. A train.
Speaker 1: A train too.
Speaker 0: No. As we talk About conditions in this country, the rabbi Finkelstein, the people know that their standard of living is being it's not meticulously being destroyed now. It's coming by chuck chunks, it's coming by large gouges at this time, Total industrial plants, automotive plants are being shut down, 1500 to 3000 in a Plant are losing their livelihood. It's just a matter of time, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Well, of course, but all they really ever had anyway. Once you give up working for yourself and you work for somebody else, You're a slave to that person. What you're doing is actually he's not paying you money, but all the labor that you're doing, You're giving him a piece of the action and when you give him a piece of the action you're making him the rich guy not you. So All we let them do is make a subsistence living. They could never afford to buy a house on their own.
We got to give them a payment plan. Of course, We do them a favor and so we collect a level of interest for that, about 3 houses for every one that we sell them, But you have to be in business for yourself. If you're not in business for yourself, then you never have a chance to make any money. You're gonna be a working stiff, A slave, a serf, you're a schlepper.
Speaker 0: General, Rabbi Finklestein, you're very brazen tonight, and I I I'm really surprised at how truthful that you've been in answering a lot of my point blank questions. Why is it why is it hard for the why why do the Jews feel Or is this just a paranoid schizophrenic feeling that everyone in this country is looking at them, wanna do things to them and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Well, they better not look at us too hard and accuse us because that's antisemitism. And if you we catch you with antisemitism. We control a book at you. Remember, we control the court system, all the Jew judges, The Jew's lawyers, the Jew prosecutors, and we wrote most of the law, not us necessarily, but we pay Our, William, in Washington DC, the Democrats and the Republicans, they sit down and we have them write up laws. We tell them what to do, they put it on the paper, we don't actually even do the work.
Speaker 0: You know as we're on the Turner Radio network here, this is One of the only live radio networks that actually 2 individuals that come from 2 opposite parts of this planet, You Rabbi Finkelstein and yours truly James Wickstrom, you know, we are on two Totally opposite sides of this planet and both of us have 2 totally Different wants and needs and desires against one another, and yet here we are sitting here tonight live on the Turner Radio Network Discoursing about people, discoursing about things, being honest and truthful, and in telling the truth to the masses, But, you know, the the masses have a hard time believing anything.
Speaker 1: Well, we've done a great paint washing job on them over the centuries And especially the last few 100 years, I we just plain lost them completely. They believe anything we tell them. And, you know, in the mean we have a lot of fun around Passover where we still the children. And, You know, we, I know you know because I've heard it on your show before. I mean, we steal a 100 to 300000 children a year just here in this country, And we drain the blood and we mix it with the Passover blood and then we throw the bodies into the slaughterhouses that we own And we grind up all the bodies and the sausage and the hamburger.
McDonald's is one of our favorite outlets and, the people, they eat up for breakfast. They eat They eat out their children for lunch and, you know, us Jews, you know, we gotta, we gotta do what we do. The the the most important thing to remember between you Pastor Wickstrom and me Levi Vingerstein of New York that We both have 2 fathers and so that's why we look at the world in 2 different ways. And we know that there's
Speaker 0: a massive collision that's gonna take place between two forces, don't we?
Speaker 1: Well, that's what your book says. Our book says that we're gonna take over the world. Well, I look at you doing a pretty good job right now.
Speaker 0: Yes. So you've done a pretty good job. But, you know, there's quite an awakening coming. And, my father, who's not your father, my father Yahweh, who isn't your father. Of course, your father is talked about by my father in John 844 stating that your father was Satan and that you're the descendant of Cain Who was the 1st murderer?
And and you know that's true because you teach it in your synagogue.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's true. But it's not for you going to know. But Right now it's too late. It's over for your white guys. So that's why I'm speaking so honestly, to bring it out into the open So that you can see it for what it is.
You've been teaching the people real good, but they don't wake up, do they? You don't get a lot of followers, do they? Because you know why? They're scared of us Jews because they don't wanna be called antisemites, And they believe that we're the chosen people, and so that's why, we can do whatever we want to do, and we can get away with it because the white Men are cowards and we go to the synagogue all the time and have some men of Shevitz and dance the Hava Nagila.
Speaker 0: You know, it's interesting. I've told people for years years, it's not that You Jews are hiding anything. You're coming right out on television, in the newspapers, on the radio, and you're telling the people exactly what you're gonna do before you do it, and they're, like, they're brain dead.
Speaker 1: Well, we did a good job with the public school system. We got you to put all of your children in there. You notice that the Jew doesn't put his children in there. They go to the Hebrew Academy Well, we teach them the real things and then they go to the synagogue and they learn the real important things, but we send your kids To the public school, we even have you tax yourself from your property so that you never own your property. And, So if you don't make your property tax, we're gonna take your property.
You can bet on that. And we have you put your kid in a 12 year, babysitting It's about all it does because you don't learn anything and then by that time the kids, they get to be teenagers and then, we give them the music. Not that we really want to call it music because, oy vey, that's not music, but they listen to that and then they want to do what they want to do And so we sell them drugs and, we make a lot of money off your children. Your children from cradle to grave. All we do is make money off of them.
Your Cattle. You're Goyam. The human cattle. Mazel tov.
Speaker 0: You know, it's interesting. Yes. I know what
Speaker 1: you call us, but I
Speaker 0: But you know, you may call me Graham, but I can call you devil. But you know I'm gonna be calling you a good name because that's what you are. Well, that's true. Now you see, Rabbi Finkelstein, in your synagogue out there in New York, do you have a lot of infighting with the other Jews, the Orthodox Jews, and the other Jews? I mean, is there a lot of infighting for For the money out there in New York, I've I've heard that there's a big, you know, war going on now with
Speaker 1: Well, we we fight a little bit and we argue a little bit. Of course, that's the 2 most important things we do is complain and get the guilt And, so what we do, we're not really fighting among ourselves because we're both going to make a lot of money. It's just who's going to make a little more on this Deal and who's gonna make a little more on that deal. The bottom line though is we have the guy. The guy does all the work.
The the makes all the stuff. He sells it to us for pennies. We're the wholesalers. We're the middlemen. We mark it way up and sell it to the other on the retail side.
There's an old saying in Yiddish that the reason that God made Gentiles is because somebody has to pay retail. It's not gonna be the Jew for sure. The Jew doesn't pay retail. It's the guy that pays retail. We By wholesale.
Speaker 0: Well, that's very interesting. I understand it. But I also know the bloodletting. I know that, On your Passover, which isn't mine, that a lot of little children do disappear, and I I I do know that, and I know of a lot of police, Police departments and agencies have been informed, but you're very open you're very open tonight. I'm very surprised That you're talking about the bloodletting of the little children that you put their blood in the matzoh balls and that you eat it on sacrifice On Passover.
Speaker 1: Well, there was a poem that wrote a book about it back in the thirties. I forget his name at the moment, but anyway he wrote the book. People didn't buy the book. People don't want to listen. We've been doing this For 1000 and 1000 of years since down to Adam's time, we take the children of our enemy Which is the white lace and, we bring them to the basements in the synagogues where we, drain the blood And, watch them die there.
It's very similar to how we do, The sacrifices that we do with the, kosher butchering and, so we do that and then we mix it with the Passover bread And so we eat the blood of our enemies and the bodies, we're not cannibals, so what we do is we take those because we can make some shekels And we give them to the slaughterhouses and those are pounds and pounds and pounds of meat that we grind up in the sausage and the hamburger And that's why we made those the most popular things, sausage for breakfast and hamburger for lunch. And so all the Goyamati are really eating the children And, even when we say this outright and tell you people you don't believe it, so that's that's your problem.
Speaker 0: You know, I've got a question and and I I yes. It is a problem. But but you see, I've always wondered how did you Jews ever get control of the churches in this country. It's always baffled me to a varying degree, Rabbi Finkelstein. You know, you have your synagogue out there in New York on the East Coast.
But I'm wondering, how did you ever totally get control Of these Christian churches who at one time told their congregations to stay away from you Jews. How did that happen? Well,
Speaker 1: you know our father, Lucifer, the the number one thing of all the organizations out there on the Earth That we would wanna infiltrate and take over of, obviously, would be the churches. So we attacked them first and we attacked them most, And we infiltrated the Catholic choice right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope and all the cardinals and the bishops were a yarmulke? The white guys never figures this out. And so then we took all your books that had all your scriptures in there, then we buried them, and then we wrote them in Latin So that you couldn't understand them, but we understood Latin because we're Jews and we're smart and we're educated.
But you, You never you never teach yourself. You don't self teach. You're always looking for somebody else to do it for you. So, you wind up being schleppers all your life. And so, anyway, a 1000 years later when the, the bunch of the white race started to wake up in Europe and they started to leave the Catholic Church.
It was a terrible time because we weren't making as many shekels as we used to, so we had to put a stop to it. So the kings that we had in our hip pockets just like the politicians of Washington DC today, we paid them off to get you declared hematics So that they would crucify you and kill you, but there was too many of you. And the the West was opening up when the Jews opened up New York and Rio, And everybody started going west to the Americas and so, we had to come up with a plan b, and plan b, we formed the Jesuits. Was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola Loyola that, he started the, Jesuits and so they decided to infiltrate All the Protestant churches out there, and as always, us Jews work our way to the top, and then we take over the money line, The shekel line, the most important line, the lifeline, the gold, and so we took that over. And so slowly but surely, we teach the teachings, change them a little bit to where it's all run by the Catholic church again, the mother church.
It's, your mother, but the father churches, the synagogues In Israel and in the synagogues in New York.
Speaker 0: You know, this is most interesting. There was a Just recently or a couple of months ago here, Rabbi Finkelstein, of of Ethiopian Jews and Israelites, these are black Jews. And, the Jews in Israelite didn't want them there. And the Ethiopian, the Black Jews said, oh no, we're Jews, we belong here too. How does this all fit in?
Well, how are these black Jews and The Jews over in Israel, I didn't want them. Were they kinda like a disgrace or what?
Speaker 1: Well, who wants a bunch of in your land? You don't want the Schwatzes in there. There are some rabbis that went down to Ethiopia and they said, oh, we'd like to be Jews too. We laughed, but we said, okay. Pay us a few dollars, and we'll teach you how to be a Jew.
So there was a few rabbis that that, made some money there in Ethiopia, but every Jew knows that a Schwatze can never be a Jew, and we don't want them dirtying up the neighborhood, in over in, Israel. We give them neighborhoods here in America. We give them, white women to mate with, to destroy both races and, What can I say?
Speaker 0: Well, that's in other words, just like Elizabeth Taylor now. She was a white woman and yet she said she Took on the ways of Jewry. How does this fit in?
Speaker 1: Well, she married a nice little Jewish boy named Eddie Fisher, and they had a daughter named Kathy Fisher, and so, she donates a lot of money to the synagogue. She's a good Goyam Shiksa And, she thinks she's Jewish. She can think what she wants. Hopefully, that she'll give a lot of money to our synagogue when she dies, Which should be soon because she doesn't look like she's in too
Speaker 0: good health. Rabbi Finkelstein, we're coming down on time here, but I wanted to get into this because, you know, You and I are at war. The war actually is between the white race, the children of set Against the children of Cain of which you are and we know that it's been written in the Aramaic and in all the ancient texts, You know this as well as I that only 1 race is gonna survive on the face of this earth, and you know it's the white race.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what your book says. Our book to Thomas says we're gonna rule, and we're gonna have a world of our own, And we're gonna go out into space, and we're gonna have a war with your father, and we're gonna win this time.
Speaker 0: Well, that's going to be most interesting, but until then the masses continue to awaken In many aspects in this country and in white Europe, you know, all of all of all of Rothschild's Banks control the white nations and have perverted the nation. Well, it amazes me how you penetrated into the federal agencies like the FBI and the National Security Agency and how you have all these blockers and protectors in that.
Speaker 1: It's very easy to take over a government when you're a bank because the government has to borrow money from the bank. And once they borrow money, As it says even in your books, as it says in ours, who borrows is slave to the lender and so this government here in America is slave The Federal Reserve System, which is bank, plus a few of us other Jews who make a few shekels off of it, And the politicians that we put in charge, they all take bribes. They're all a bunch of. They like To, drink and they like to take the drugs and they like to do the, thing with the. So that's what they do and it's very easy to control the government.
The hardest thing was penetrating the churches because there used to be a few good, preachers in there, But, over time as us Jews, we're so smart. We're the chosen people. We always infiltrate and take over everything And everything that there is out there today, we own and we control.
Speaker 0: I'd like to ask you this question before we get off the air. We've got about 2 minutes, A point blank question. Is communism Jewish?
Speaker 1: Of course. Karl Marx, Moses Mordechai Levy, We had a couple of grandfathers that were Jewish. He's the one who created it along with Engels. He was another nice Jewish boy. Now we implemented it and got that started in Russia.
It was a great bill of goods to sell the masses. We tell them, hey. You're here at the bottom. How would you like to be equal? Everybody be equal.
They thought they were gonna come up, but we brought the rich ones down to their level, and we took all the money, And we run it and they're all a bunch of schleppers and, we make the shekels and we're the masters of the world And all the is just human cattle. Well, Rabbi Finkelystan, I know that
Speaker 0: all of you Jews are gonna die. It's written by Yahweh. I'm glad you got on here and told the truth to the listening audience. You've been listening to John 844, pastor Bob's program I'm setting in for him. I'm James Wishtram, a teacher of Yahweh.
Our program tonight, The Lying Jews. Stay tuned for the Turner Radio Network and more truth that's coming out. Pastor Bob will be back with you next Wednesday at 9 PM Eastern Standard Time. Until then, Yahweh bless.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Burgers contain human and rat DNA: https://fox59.com/news/national-world/report-burgers-contain-human-and-rat-dna/
Report: Burgers contain human and rat DNA
Hamburgers are a classic American food, and on average, Americans eat nearly 50 billion hamburgers every year. But a recent report by Clear Labs has many people cringing. Clear Labs is a food-analytics platform for retailers and manufacturers, and on Tuesday they released an extensive molecular analysis of burger products. The company analyzed 258 samples […]
fox59.com
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Video Transcript AI Summary
Schizos have a unique ability to detect psychos and are targeted by them. There is a silent war between the two groups, with psychos dominating normies who are not as good at detecting them. The speaker dismisses arguments about being a sheep and believes in the flat earth theory. They question the credibility of scientists and argue against the existence of satellites and space junk. They also express skepticism about the moon landing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Schizos are able to know psychos on an instinctual level and suss them out in a way that most normies never could. Thus, there is a constant demoralization campaign against Schizos from the tyrant psychos who seek to use the overall population against their greatest natural enemy. There's a silent war happening between psychos and Schizos. The population for both are very small, but 1 group is more likely to become CEOs, and the other is more likely to become homeless. Schizos are good at pattern recognition and can notice the psychos.
Normies aren't as good at detecting psychos, and psychos relish it and dominate them because of this.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 0: Yes. Us. It's all about how to handle the sheep. A lot of people wanna be sheep. They don't they don't want autonomy.
People want to be controlled. They want a shepherd. If you wanna be a sheep to psychopaths, go ahead. I don't I don't wanna hear it here. Same shit that we've heard a 1000 times and debunked, but yet they still keep saying it.
I I've I've heard all your dumb arguments. We were raised with this bullshit. Elementary school, middle school, high school, college, all of that. It's bullshit. It's like, they they act like we're the crazy people.
You sound so fucking stupid when you talk flat earth. 8 inches per mile Laird. That's stupid, and it no. It isn't. That's the equation of the curve of the, alleged blow.
There is no curve. There's literally no curve. It doesn't exist. It's not real, and that terrifies a certain type of human being. I I just don't feel that.
And and so then those just latch on to anything that allows them to stay in the lie. It is a lie. You have to be fucking at this point to not see that no one played golf on the moon and broke the technology and can't return. Those are the childlike lies of a psychopath. Okay?
That's not even close to a sophisticated lie. Not even post all such a a low level psychopathy. It's such low level wise. Think an abstract thought us. Without commitment, you just think.
Some people can't do that. Some people are incapable of abstract thought. Can't you just think? Can't you just ponder? They the can't.
I've looked myself into the nature of this reality, and it is not a spinning ball. Every single proof they give shows it can't be. My whole childhood, because I have a memory. I'm not a broken sheep. I'm not a gold fish.
They told me that the the boat goes over the curb, and that's why you can only see the mass and all that. They said that. They did not say that was because the fucking light bends. They gave me one lie, and then I said, well, I can see it now. I can zoom it in.
Oh, the light bends. So it never was bust a curve then. It's one of the main things they said. I now completely understand how that illusion works. The technology has outpaced the lies.
With a p 900 camera. You can zoom in and you see it plain as day. It's 50 miles away. No curve whatsoever. Oh, the light bends.
It's an optical the light bend. No. When I was Kidney never said the fucking light vent. You said that that was the curve. Well, now oh, so in the 19 nineties, you didn't know?
So show me where you guys learned that it wasn't a curve that it's actually because the light bends. Like, it's like when you call out finance or whatever. Finance. You're crazy. You're insane.
You're crazy. You should be in a mental institution. Why? Everything that we see looks like we're on a flat not moving plane. All ancient religions think we're on a including Christianity believes we're on a flat, not moving plane.
So I have to trust the people telling me we're not, and they have to have an argument that makes logical sense, which they don't, and they never have. And it's the reaction shows the lie.
Speaker 2: They're so the stupid. They're so crazy. You make yourself look really dumb when you say that.
Speaker 0: I'm like, of of all the things that makes you react with such vitriol, ego, intensity. It shouldn't matter at all to people. Oh, it just makes
Speaker 2: you sound totally insane.
Speaker 0: No. That reaction told me that there's truth to it. What's seen as crazy is it. It's just looking around and saying, okay. My eyes tell me this is not a curve.
Why wouldn't someone trust their eyes and their ears and their hands in their nodes, in their mouth, in their logic. I go up in a plane, I don't see a curve. They go up a 120,000 feet, I don't see a curve. I the fisheye lenses. Okay?
I I can do math. I can do experiments with the p 900 camera. I don't think it looks like a spinning ball. Okay. Hate.
I have to trust scientists, and I know they're lying. They lie all the time. Their information keeps coming back false. Snipers have to factor in the Coriolis effect. No.
They don't. I'm friends with a ton of snipers. Most snipers I know are flat earthers. There's nothing in the cockpit that factors in the curve of the earth. 0, nothing.
But what about satellites? Satellites are bullshit. Why do you lose cell connection in a valley? Well, cell connections from cell towers, not satellite.
Speaker 2: They triangulate it, ain't it? If you
Speaker 0: could make a fucking phone call from the moon In 1969, why do I lose reception on my property based on mountains? Doesn't make any sense. And the thing is they can't explain it without just going, well,
Speaker 2: you know, the satellite beams it down to the tower, and then the tower
Speaker 0: will broadcast, and then no. Or it's just towers. Why don't more satellites get hit by space junk? The amount of space junk, the amount of just anything in orbit, screws, anything, any one of those things things going 10,000 miles an hour. That's way faster than any bullet.
And if it just grazes a satellite, that satellite will need to be repaired. How do you bring it to Earth? How do you crash it to Earth? Then you set up another one. How often does that happen?
How many times do we have to replace the satellite since the Cold War? None? This is the problem with psychopathic liars. They'll say a lie to sell one thing to get something, and then they'll sell a contradictory to rely to get something else. And then when you, the non psychopath, says, well, how can those 2 things exist simultaneously?
Like, they said that the earth is surrounded by space junk. The tens of thousands of miles an hour. There's little sprues and doodads flying everywhere. Okay. So then how is there the ISS then?
I don't think there's 1 grain of space junk up there because I don't believe in orbits. Do I think that there's things in the sky moving over us? Yes. Yes. I do.
They have drones, balloons, huge network up there. Do I think they're going 15,000 miles an hour, so they fall with the gravity of the earth and they stay there for decades without needing any maintenance or running into space junk or any particles and destroying them and their fragile tech just keeps working and broadcasting thing. No. No. Of course not.
That's
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 0: Do you think that in 1969, them. They landed on the moon and played golf. Do you believe that? Why wouldn't you question more of the things they said. Why would you believe anything else they say, especially when you can identify
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Break out of the matrix
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I never go back to the carpet store.
Speaker 1: This guy's taken Roy off the grid, no social security number.
Speaker 2: The Matrix is everywhere, even in this room. It blinds you from the truth. You're a slave, born into a prison you can't sense.
Speaker 1: The Matrix is our enemy, but most people aren't ready to unplug.
Speaker 2: They're dependent on the system and will fight to protect it.
Speaker 1: Live again.
Speaker 2: Not everyone can be a robot polisher.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the difference between you and me, Morty. I never go back
Speaker 1: to the carpet store. Holy shit. This guy's taken Roy off the grid. This guy doesn't have his social Security number for Roy.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be a robot polisher. The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now in this very room, you can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes.
It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from truth. You are a slave. You were born into bondage. Born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch.
Speaker 1: A prison for your mind. Matrix is a system, Neil. That system. The matrix is the system, Neil. That system is our enemy.
But when you're inside, you look around, what do you system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to unplugged.
Speaker 2: And many of them are still on earth, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect us.
Speaker 1: Live again.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be, a robot polisher.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Any breed of dog can be trained to detect explosives, drugs, etc… It’s mainly ab finding the 1 dog in 100 that’s *obsessed* with its ball. NASA is #1 in D.E.I. among govt agencies. It’s literally just Space Camp for the 1 in a 100 “adult” that’s *obsessed* with “space”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Space is the training ground for future astronauts. Experts from NASA discuss whether it is the future and the key to reaching the stars or just a fun getaway from parents. Wernher von Braun, the founder of America's space program, believed that the youth of America was crucial for the next generation of space travel. They showcase a microgravity chair that simulates walking on the moon. The emphasis on space is vital for the country. The video ends with a quote from a tombstone about the glory of God in the heavens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Space. Space. Space. Space. Space.
Please. The training ground for astronauts of tomorrow. To get to hear from experts like people from NASA.
Speaker 1: Is it the future? Is it the key
Speaker 0: to reaching the stars? Or is it just 5 totally awesome days away from mom and dad?
Speaker 1: Is it the future? Is it
Speaker 0: the key to reaching the stars? Or is it just 5 totally awesome days away from mom and dad?
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be, a robot party.
Speaker 3: I used to work for a man named Wernher von Braun, who was the founder of America's space program and certainly The father of the moon landing, and he believed that the youth of America was a very valuable resource. And his concern was that we must Prepare for the next generation of space travel. And to do that, we must have a bright, Challenging young group of people coming up to to meet the requirements of our next effort. A
Speaker 4: Right. Challenging young group of people.
Speaker 5: Tomorrow search our astronaut training.
Speaker 6: Microgravity chair, which stimulates 1 6th gravity for the sensation of walking on the surface of the moon. The five d f for 5 degrees of freedom used to practice space watch.
Speaker 5: Wow. That was the coolest. Can I do that again?
Speaker 3: And I am absolutely convinced the emphasis here on space is absolutely vital To our country.
Speaker 5: In seconds. 8, 7, red engine start. 3, 2, Rory, boost the ignition. Lift off. You have fins and towers.
Roger, starting Columbia is now 58 miles high and traveling at 15,000 miles per hour. Roger, Marshall ops turning off the astronomy telescopes. Is Base camp tons of fun. What? What part were you?
Orbital systems officer. What'd you I watch the lights go on and off. What's your favorite part of the ice cream? A payload specialist too. What'd you do?
I worked the bunch of buttons and got confused. I was mission specialist too, and I had to put together like to take it apart. What's launch lane you're trying to do?
Speaker 4: It,
Speaker 5: Like, help them when they launch off and then they land. Kinda self explanatory. Right? Yeah. How The the pilot wants to help direct the point of the shuttle, tracking officer.
Is that nonstop fun?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 3: The emphasis here on space is absolutely vital. A bright,
Speaker 4: challenging, young group of people.
Speaker 5: It would be many years Yet
Speaker 0: before our plans can fully materialize.
Speaker 7: On his tombstone is one Biblical passage. The heavens declare the glory of god and the firmament show it in
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
#AlexJonesWasRight
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims to have video evidence of something, but the context is unclear. Speaker 1 mentions a radio host who called Speaker 0 and Hillary demons, claiming they smell like sulfur. Speaker 2 watched Fox News and saw the police chief from a town in Minnesota making excuses. The Fox News host criticized Donald Trump for calling an incident a bombing before it was officially confirmed, and mentioned that Hillary had valid points.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have them on video. I come up dating from here. I kill my kids. We came. We saw.
He died.
Speaker 1: There's A guy on the radio who apparently trumps on his show frequently. He said me and
Speaker 0: Hillary are demons. Said we smell like sulfur. Ain't that something? I have never seen or smelled any woman like that ever. People are telling me to smell.
You could not notice someone who smelled that bad.
Speaker 2: I was watching Fox News as I worked out this morning, and they had the police chief on making excuses from that town of Minnesota. And they had the Fox News host, this is the Fair and Balance Channel, going, Donald Trump really stepped in at this time. He said it was a bombing before it had officially been called The bombing, and Hillary's on him, and she's got some really good points.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Einstein died in the 50s, there’s a reason you haven’t seen/heard many videos of him speaking..,
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the special theory of relativity, it was discovered that mass and energy are different forms of the same thing. This may be a difficult concept to grasp. The equation E=mc^2 shows that a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy. This was proven in a 1932 experiment by Kotkrat and Waltham. So, according to this formula, mass and energy are equivalent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both are but different manifestations of the same thing, a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind. Furthermore, the equation e is equal m c square, in which energy is not equal to mass multiplied with the square of the velocity of light showed that very small amount of mass may be converted into a very large amount of energy. And we prefer the mass and energy were, in fact, equivalent according to the formula mentioned above. This was demonstrated by Kotkrat and Waltham in 1932 experiment.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Why do you think this one triggers them so hard?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, an 8-year-old explains the concept of flat earth. They argue that gravity is a theory, not a proven fact, and that density and electromagnetic frequency are responsible for objects falling, not gravity. They also claim that since water is level and covers 70% of the Earth, the Earth must be flat. The speaker dismisses the idea of a round Earth by stating that people and boats don't walk or sail upside down. They believe in a flat Earth surrounded by a firmament, which they compare to air pressure in a tire. The speaker also discusses the sun, moon, and Earth, claiming that the moon has its own light and is not reflecting the sun's light. They conclude by stating that Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the lie, and encourage viewers to investigate the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 8 years old, and I'm going to be teaching you about flat earth. And not everybody can be, robot polisher. So first, we're going to start off with gravity. Grabby is a theory, not a fact. That's attracting masks never been proven properly.
This happened in 16/66, an apple fell on Isaac Newton. It must have been a big apple for him to believe in gravity. Gravity is fake because density and emf are making things drop not gravity. There is items felt in this cup and no one I felt in the other cup. There is 2 cups of water with an egg.
1 was inan salt but with no inan salt. This one has inan salt and it has Electricity because electricity is pushing the egg up. On the other one, it has no electricity in it because the egg is denser than the water. Density and surrounding medium with e m n. That stands or electromagnetic frequency.
If gravity can't be proven and earth is 70% water, We know water state level in 70% of earth is level. Now we are going to move on to the globe and our flat earth. So say there's a boat just cruising on the bottom of the earth. It would fall into space. If space was real, stars would have paralyzed but feet don't.
So you'll just go on the space and this is for anything that can't go upside down. If people believe that the earth is round, people don't walk upside down. Same with a boat. It doesn't it doesn't sail upside down. Do you think this is true or not?
Well no, it is not. This is our true black first and the thing around it is the firmament. I'm going to tell you how the firmament is real. The Remind is real because air pressure has to be contained just like in a tire. Now we are going to move on to seasons and the sun.
The spinning ball globe believers say that the sun is 93,000,000 miles away. The globe depends on parallel rays for the season. All you have to do is use your god given eyes to see we have capuscular rays from the sun. Capustula rays proves we have a local sun. That proves everything about seasons and the sun.
Now we are going to run to a sun, moon, and earth depiction. The sun is shining on the moon and the moon is shining on the earth. Why is it not shining its temperature on earth? Well me and my dad did an experiment 1 night on a full moon And we use a laser thermometer to check the moon's light and its shadow. The moon's Light was colder than each shadow.
So that proves the light is colder than each shadow and proves That the that the moon has its own light. The sun is not reflecting its light on the moon. The moon has its own light. Thank you for watching my clever presentation. I hope you guys liked it and Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and and the lie.
Just remember, the truth does not fear investigation. Thank you for watching. Bye. Not
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
“Space” is for children and low IQ “adults”
Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA scientists have captured stunning images of the cartwheel galaxy using the Webb telescope. The images are even better than expected, resembling abstract artwork or scenes from a science fiction film. The level of detail is so real that it almost looks fake. The images reveal real cosmic sculptures and objects in space, capturing the imagination of a new generation. These discoveries, once thought impossible, are now becoming a reality. The mission to capture these images required incredible precision and power, and the people behind it are amazed at what they have accomplished. The excitement and awe of these images are contagious, especially among young students who are captivated by the wonders of space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've all
Speaker 1: been looking at them in awe, gushing over them. Truly dazzling. Look at this thing. Isn't it beautiful? The clearest image of the so called cartwheel galaxy.
NASA scientists are saying they're even better than what they had hoped for. They're stunning. Yeah. They knew they would be good. They just did not know that they would be this good.
Each one is better than the last. Even if we're not quite sure we understand what these gorgeous Webb telescope images are actually showing.
Speaker 0: You can't see infrared. Okay. But the color you would see if your eyes could see infrared. So It's authentic and legit. I
Speaker 2: mean, it's almost too much to even comprehend.
Speaker 0: I mean,
Speaker 1: it looks like I mean, it looks like a painting. I mean, it looks like abstract artwork. It looks Looks like a painting with all the colors and and dragging in the foreground.
Speaker 3: I felt I was going to, a gallery. This is the an art piece, this thing.
Speaker 0: Film. Like Star Wars.
Speaker 2: Like, when you watch it, it
Speaker 0: it looks like it's something out of a science fiction film.
Speaker 1: It looks absolutely unreal and animated. Like r two d two coming out of the Halo Van.
Speaker 0: I think it looks so ridiculous and impossible.
Speaker 1: It was almost like something out of a film or out of something that someone had created graphically.
Speaker 2: These are cosmic sculptures. On trained eye, this is the rat's speck. Those aren't little dots in of light in the sky. Those are real bodies. They're interesting places out there.
Speaker 1: Lots of life, light, and now they are real objects.
Speaker 0: Detail you see is going to be real.
Speaker 2: And they're real.
Speaker 0: That shows you that that really is your as well. This is real. What's happening? You can tell it's real because It looks so fake, honestly.
Speaker 1: It almost looks fake. And we'd like to compliment NASA on the orbiter model that they got for to take these pictures.
Speaker 0: This thing really does have a a Star Wars effect. More Star Wars even Star
Speaker 2: And no.
Speaker 0: It is not a model. We saw it with our own eyes and that's what it was. It feels very, very real. That's what you're after here.
Speaker 1: So when we're in that capsule waiting for launch. We're just running our procedures. You could almost,
Speaker 0: you know, trick us.
Speaker 1: Say that we're in the simulator and it wasn't real.
Speaker 0: No. We knew that it wasn't a simulator Laura. This is the real thing.
Speaker 1: Simulations seem as real as the mission.
Speaker 4: I promise we are not playing a trick on you. This is real. It is science. It is rocket science.
Speaker 1: We feel like They're real.
Speaker 5: Moving 6 times faster than we would in in the real world.
Speaker 6: We get accused of, doing this in a hangar someplace in Texas. And so that last sequence The disk was our proof that this was onboard the, orbiter in, in a micro g environment.
Speaker 0: Actual position that the body kind of assumes with the hands and the arms out and and that real space,
Speaker 2: is, real. So you can convince yourself that you see what's in these galaxies. So I
Speaker 3: I I think there's a good bridge here to make between science and then art.
Speaker 1: Transform into something real. The views of our blue marble in the blackness of space now capturing the imagination the imagination now capturing the imagination of a new generation. Really captures people's imagination. It just capture my imagination every time. It's hard hard to even imagine that that's true.
It could seem a little bit easier to imagine. I could barely imagine. I just cannot even imagine. We almost couldn't believe that it was happening.
Speaker 7: What it takes to imagine, much less attempt a mission this ambitious.
Speaker 1: Kind of blows my mind. Almost hard to wrap your head around, a little unbelievable to me.
Speaker 0: This is a new era of the unbelievable. Discoveries that were miracles a few short years ago are that is commonplace today. Many of the things that seem impossible now will become realities tomorrow.
Speaker 5: Crossroads is science fiction and reality.
Speaker 7: I'm still having a hard time believing this is real.
Speaker 0: We're gonna go do this, and it's impossible, but we did it.
Speaker 7: Once unthinkable, they're now on the cusp of doing the seemingly
Speaker 0: impossible.
Speaker 5: People figured out how to make all that work, and that's amazing to me that we have people in our country now
Speaker 2: to do that. The impossible comes
Speaker 5: possible. The way they could fix it over a 1,000,000,000 miles, nothing but radio waves was truly remarkable. Truly remarkable.
Speaker 2: No aerodynamic or aerothermal test facility can recreate the conditions, that we will see.
Speaker 1: Something that could never movie accomplished in a laboratory here on Earth.
Speaker 2: Power is, on the order of about 1 20,000,000,000, the amount of power required to to power my my digital watch. The accuracy required to reach this remote planet has been compared to a golf course taking a putt a 1000 miles away.
Speaker 5: It's kinda incredible to think that that vehicle lifts off, on top of a bunch of rocket engines, pushing it out into space. You do all that stuff, and then it comes back and it lands like this, like an airplane. Unbelievable. I don't know where we got all the people that knew how to make that work, but, We do
Speaker 7: making the impossible possible.
Speaker 1: They're so excited. Their faces, it was amazing.
Speaker 0: This is showing people more excited, like, freaked out excited, like, the look of those people. Oh my god.
Speaker 5: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 8: You think that's A hit in elementary school. Look how their eyes get big when you start talking about space.
Speaker 1: And that becomes the only reality.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
“Orbital Mechanics” For Dummies
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ancient man observed star patterns and believed the Earth was flat. In 150 AD, Ptolemy proposed the geocentric theory, stating that the Earth is stationary at the center of the universe. In the 1500s, Copernicus introduced the heliocentric theory, which suggests that the Earth revolves around the sun. Johannes Kepler later developed three laws of planetary motion, explaining that planets move in elliptical orbits and that the line joining a planet to the sun sweeps over equal areas in equal time intervals. Despite Earth's rotation and orbit, we do not feel any motion because our speed remains constant and the air around us moves with us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When ancient man looked to the heavens for guidance from the gods, he noticed star patterns and began to document their movement across the heavens. The ancients believed that the Earth was flat. About 150 AD, Ptolemy presented the geocentric theory. The belief that the Earth is stationary at the center of the universe with the sun, moon, stars and planets revolving around it in complex orbits. In the 1500, Nicolaus Copernicus of Poland presented the heliocentric theory, The belief that the Earth revolves around the sun as it rotates on its axis.
This aspect of astronomy evolved into an intricate study of planetary motion known as orbital mechanics.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot, Polycom.
Speaker 0: In the early 1600, Johannes Kepler developed three laws of planetary motion. Kepler's first law states
Speaker 2: all planets move in elliptical orbit with the sun at one focus and the
Speaker 0: other focus empty. Kepler's second law, the law of areas states
Speaker 2: The line joining the planet to the sun sweeps over equal areas in equal time intervals.
Speaker 0: When a satellite orbits, the line Joining it to the Earth sweeps over equal areas in equal periods of time. If areas 1, 2, and 3 are equal, times 1, 2, and 3 are also equal. Therefore, the speed of the satellite changes depending on its distance from the center of the earth. And you
Speaker 1: are moving a 1000 miles an hour As earth rotates, and that's fast. That's faster than you would ever be going in anything in your life. You are moving 18 is it 18 miles per second in orbit around the sun?
Speaker 3: With all these rotations and Evolution. You are probably wondering, why don't I feel the earth move?
Speaker 1: Earth returning and moving, we feel it. Okay. Why wouldn't you feel
Speaker 3: The answer is quite simple. We do not feel any
Speaker 1: of this motion. Because first, Earth connect you to the surface, but also you're moving very uniformly.
Speaker 3: These speeds are constant. The spinning and orbital speeds of Earth stayed the same, so we do not feel any acceleration or deceleration.
Speaker 1: And the air around you is moving with you. So it's not like air is coming past you at the 1,000 miles. And I didn't feel oh my gosh. I'm in motion, and I feel the jiggle and the shake.
Speaker 3: You can only feel motion if your speed changes. Earth revolves around the sun at an average speed of about 27 kilometers or 17 miles per second. But the speed is not constant. The planet moves slower when it is at aphelion
Speaker 1: point farthest from the Earth
Speaker 3: and faster when it is at perihelion.
Speaker 1: Point in the orbit closest to the Earth.
Speaker 3: We do not feel any of this motion because These speeds are constant, but the speed is not constant. The planet moves slower when it is at aphelion And faster when it is at perihelion. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant. But the speed is not constant. But the speed is not constant.
But the speed It's not constant.
Speaker 1: So clearly, Earth can't be moving. We of course, we're not rotating either. Everything is moving around us. It kinda made sense when you thought about it, when you thought about
Speaker 3: it, when you thought about it.
Speaker 1: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 4: The fact that you rotate, k, the greater is the centrifugal force you will that will operate on you. Trying to swing you off the Earth, k, but the force of gravity is resisting Okay. That's how it hit it hit. There are powers left that you left typically because the spinning Earth is trying to swing you off.
Speaker 1: Nice. Yes. This
Speaker 4: is really cool.
reSee.it AI Summary
Repetition: The most basic mind control.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
-The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition -The most basic form of mind control is repetition
Video Transcript AI Summary
For centuries, people believed the Earth was flat and the center of everything. Then, Nicolaus Copernicus challenged this idea. We are taught from a young age that the Earth is round, and most of us never question it. However, being so attached to our initial beliefs makes it difficult to accept opposing views. We become connected to our ideas, and they become part of our identity. We often believe something simply because we've heard it repeatedly. This can lead to a distorted understanding of reality. Controlling the information we receive and how we receive it shapes our worldview. It's important to have a foundation in objective reality to avoid dangerous situations. Academia plays a crucial role in holding the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For 1000 of years, the general public thought that the Earth was flat and everything revolved around it. Then, Nicolaus Copernicus said that the Earth wasn't flat and definitely not the center of anything.
Speaker 1: One of the first things we're taught as a baby, as a total of
Speaker 2: The earth is round and they just pound it into you.
Speaker 1: Most of us go through our lives without ever doubting this assertion. What you learned in kindergarten? It generally goes unchallenged as an obvious fact rather than a debatable claim.
Speaker 2: Kindergarten. Fuck what you know.
Speaker 0: You need to forget about what you know. That's your problem. Forget about what you thinking of
Speaker 2: just our ego that supported the idea that we're in the center of all. It kind of made sense When you thought about it. When you thought about it. When you thought about it. Kindergarten.
Speaker 3: There's a problem with being that inexorably connected to your first belief. When you have an idea and it's in your head, it's very difficult for people to shake that idea and they start arguing that idea that idea becomes a part of their identity.
Speaker 2: And they dig their heels in deeper when an opposing view is presented
Speaker 3: Because they connect themselves to these ideas. Right. It's it it is who they are.
Speaker 2: Just be something repeat a 100 times. That's reality. Just just something that becomes true just because you heard it often enough. You know, you hear it enough, must be true. Yeah.
There it is. In the old days, we called it brainwashing where you repeat something and then it becomes true. That's hijacking this feature of our evolutionary brain. So you you try to sift through what is true and it must be that which was repeated often enough. You are comfortable in your ignorance and you don't even know your ignorance because you came to it from from having learned, but only up to a point.
They're not only controlling the information you receive. You're shaping how you receive it, which has an effect on how you then behave. How you create a world view. You create an understanding of how things are either because someone convinced you or you convinced yourself. Now there's a gap or there's some information that conflicts with it.
So you're gonna say if you cherish this worldview, that information that conflicts with it was falsified Or that was wrong. They don't know what they're doing. You can maintain your worldview.
Speaker 1: We hold on. Like, you know, I spent so many years learning something and now the world has changed.
Speaker 2: The interesting thing about an objective is that it's true no matter what. Imagine that people need to understand to control their minds. Otherwise, other people will control it for them. And you have no foundation in objective reality. It can be dangerous.
If your personal belief system does not have correspondence in objective reality, That's an unhelpful situation that civilization could be.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be a robot polisher. Me feel That academia has the holder of truth, plays an essential role particularly today.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Why do you think flat earth triggers people so much?
Video Transcript AI Summary
People with strong opinions about the flat earth trigger others, who get angry without knowing why. They challenge the belief that the earth is a spinning ball, claiming there is no evidence to support it. They argue that trusting your own eyes is important, as it prevents being deceived by blatant lies. The video also discusses the speed at which the earth and other celestial bodies move, emphasizing the insignificance of humans in the grand scheme of things. The speakers suggest that questioning where you live affects every decision you make, and that science has been used for control and conquest. The video touches on gender identity and the importance of recognizing a spectrum rather than forcing others to conform. It concludes by stating that mapping the world was the first step in conquering it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people
Speaker 1: are sitting here with strong opinions. They have a strong opinion that they can't substantiate.
Speaker 0: Why is it that flat earth is the single thing that triggers people the most?
Speaker 2: People get so angry about it.
Speaker 1: Imagine being so programmed that you have strong emotions around the subject and you don't even know why.
Speaker 3: The force has a very strong effect on the weak minded? Why do you
Speaker 2: think that triggers people so much? People go absolutely nuts. It triggers the fuck out of people.
Speaker 0: Is it so important for them to just believe so badly? Why is it such a trigger point for these people who just can't imagine?
Speaker 4: And not everybody can be, all about potty stroke?
Speaker 0: They once thought earth was flat. Why? Because it looks flat.
Speaker 1: They are even attempting to destroy your own faith in your own eyes.
Speaker 5: Yeah. It looks really straight, but it's not because the earth is just better.
Speaker 1: They tell you you're wrong.
Speaker 2: They tell you your eyes are wrong. The brainwashing tactic of giving over your free will to an authority? It does not look like you're on a spinning ball. There's no evidence with your eyes, your hands, or ears, or anything that you're on a spinning ball. So To accept that world view means that you're putting another entity above yourself when it comes to discernment.
In it? And once you do that, then they got you.
Speaker 6: State 1, they control your brain.
Speaker 0: I've got nothing to do with this. That you're trying to be human about this? Don't be human. That mess you up.
Speaker 1: Your brain is wrong. Do you understand that they're doing this so that when you trust your own eyes that they can just tell you the most blatant lies in the world and you have to believe them.
Speaker 7: There is no such thing as not moving?
Speaker 0: There is no up or down.
Speaker 7: Even if you were at home
Speaker 6: on your couch trying to be as still as possible, you are still traveling. You're 1,000 miles an hour plus earth's 66 1,000 miles an hour plus our system's 550,000 miles an hour plus the galaxy's 2,237,000 miles an hour equals about 2,855,000 miles per hour or about 800 miles every second? How does that make you feel? Small? Tiny?
Insignificant? Significant?
Speaker 3: If you don't know where your feet are planted, you could be manipulated. You could be pushed and spun around in space, and you could be turned around, and you could be lied to about anything. If you are in error about where you live, then every single decision you make will be coming from a place of error at its foundation. You have no solid foundation to make any decision about anything. You are spinning in imaginary space.
Speaker 1: If you can't believe your own eyes, then what can you believe?
Speaker 0: Goal here is to train your mind. We have to train our tells to trust the data? What I'm gonna do is to teach you how to search.
Speaker 8: The main mission is really to change how people view the
Speaker 1: both? When they empty your brain, they will inject the slave mind.
Speaker 2: Let's say you have a slave who's actively trying to find their freedom, but doesn't know where the door is? That's not great if you're a slave owner. Right? So you'd much rather have a slave that knows exactly where the is can leave anytime they want and choose not to? The first
Speaker 8: big project, successful project of modern science was mapping the world close? And it was obvious to everybody that it's not being done out of pure curiosity. It's being done in due to control and to conquer?
Speaker 7: I like being explored. Like, great job. Oh, you're too late. There's really nothing left to
Speaker 8: To mapping the world was the 1st step for conquering The
Speaker 7: outcome of this platonic system that is being utilized now is the There is no up. There is no down. There's no head in the bed. There's no nothing.
Speaker 0: There is no such thing as not moving? There is no upper down.
Speaker 6: 7 adult death syndrome is not linked to vaccines nor is SAD a new condition. There's always been transgender children.
Speaker 0: Hi, is kids? Are you a boy? Are you a girl?
Speaker 2: There is no such thing as
Speaker 0: Your brain has a difficult time recognizing a spectrum and so you're requiring it be into a bin? So there you are forcing other people to match how you you see the world? And that's wrong.
Speaker 5: When someone asks what is a woman? The answer requires a discussion of genetics and neurochemistry?
Speaker 7: Not in biology.
Speaker 5: Very passionate about, public science literacy and science denial. Nobody is upside down. That's one of the dumbest things you morons say.
Speaker 8: Tringtic down direction caused by the gravitational pull of earth? It's the difference.
Speaker 5: What's down on
Speaker 7: a globe?
Speaker 0: If they can make you believe absurdities, they can make you commit atrocity?
Speaker 4: Not everybody can be a robot polisher. Blapping the
Speaker 8: world was the first step to conquering it.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Remember, a point of view does not represent the totality…
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
People don’t know what science is or how and why it works
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the flat earth movement and the moon landing conspiracy. Some believe the Earth is flat and challenge Joe Rogan to debate them. Others find these theories ridiculous and believe they are fueled by YouTube videos. Neil deGrasse Tyson is mentioned as someone who refuses to debate flat earthers. The speakers also mention the fragility of Earth in space and the power of scientific knowledge. Overall, the debate revolves around the credibility of scientific facts and the importance of questioning and learning throughout life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I love the word science, don't you? Everything here began with questions.
Speaker 1: If anything is scientific, you should be able to question it and someone would give you an answer.
Speaker 0: The boldest question the scientists have dared to ask.
Speaker 2: This universe won't crave for no big bang. I don't care what Neil deGrasse Tyson says.
Speaker 0: I do people deny Science.
Speaker 3: People don't know what science is or how and why it works. Science isn't a vote. Science is about facts.
Speaker 4: There's something I admire. Somebody who is willing and able to debate their viewpoint.
Speaker 2: We'll tell you right now, this Earth is flat. Okay? This Earth is flat. It's fixed, and The stars and stuff rotate around us. The sun rotates around us.
Okay? And I can prove that. I would love to debate you, Joe Rogan. If you're so confident, Come on and debate me, buddy.
Speaker 1: I believe the earth is round, but, I also believe it's Such a stupid conspiracy that you should have it. You should be allowed and it should be something you should show your friends, like, dude, I need you to go look at this. They really believe that the fucking earth is flat. They really believe there's an ice fog. Really, really wacky theories.
Have you given any consideration whatsoever to the Flat earth
Speaker 0: movement.
Speaker 5: I think that's a troll situation.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's not. No. It's not.
Speaker 6: You would like to think
Speaker 1: about it because you're super genius. But I, as a normal normal person, I know there's people way dumber than me. And they really, really believe. They watch YouTube videos which go on uninterrupted and spew out a bunch of Big facts very eloquently and articulately, and they really believe. These people really believe.
Speaker 5: I mean, if it works for them. Sure. Fine. Fine. Weird, though.
Right?
Speaker 1: Answer. At this age,
Speaker 2: boy, I'll smoke you in a debate. You I will smoke you, and and ain't nothing you can do beat me in a debate, brother, because you ain't got no answer. Proof. I will debate you right to your face.
Speaker 7: Bryce, recently you you kinda just went viral for your, for your calling out Joe Rogan About the flat earth. I mean, I I feel like everybody watched that video. That that definitely went viral. Has he invited you on the show yet to debate him or no?
Speaker 2: No, man. I think he's a little bit scared, brother.
Speaker 4: The person that does not show up to debate their viewpoint, the individual that is too afraid and lacks answer. Or the to debate their viewpoint, I have no respect for and I assume know nothing of their viewpoint.
Speaker 1: It asked you to debate one of them flat earth guys.
Speaker 3: No. I don't I can't I no. No.
Speaker 1: We talked about it, and we're gonna have a month Skype.
Speaker 3: No. That is something that should not be debated, does not belong in front of an audience getting debated. What we do is and I think this is a diabolical plot so that the next time we can ship people on mass into orbit, they all wanna be the 1st in line because they know we're gonna send them So they can speed around Earth. They're gonna be the 1st ones in space just so they can stop annoying
Speaker 7: the rest of them.
Speaker 1: I don't
Speaker 5: I don't
Speaker 1: think you're correct there.
Speaker 3: Answer. It's the diabolical plot.
Speaker 1: I do have people that have met that don't believe
Speaker 2: Hey, Joe Rogan. Since Too sissy to debate me. I'm just gonna prove you wrong on Instagram with, simple geometry. If you don't know simple geometry, have Jamie Google it for you. He'll also wipe your 42, I'm sure.
Speaker 8: Joe Rogan used to be an actual druther. He sold out his own people for money, and that's Why people hate Joe Rogan? That's why people call Joe Rogan a dirty little game midget chill because he is. Love that you, you brought up the moon landing a little tin pool. Like that those type of things make me so happy.
Speaker 2: If you do the research, you actually look into it like everybody Joe Rogan did for a long time.
Speaker 4: Ridiculous. It looks stupid. It looks ridiculous and dumb. There's no way
Speaker 1: people went on the moon. There's no way.
Speaker 8: That's what made everyone hate Joe Rogan. You understand it's not because he's gay or short. It's because he knows full fucking well no one went to the moon, and he reversed his opinion on it for money. That's a shill.
Speaker 1: I'm a sellout. I'm a round earth sellout check. I'm getting some round earth checks.
Speaker 8: Joe Rogan was one of the front Runners of the moon landing conspiracy. He was one of the guys that got me to realize that we didn't go to the moon.
Speaker 1: The Americans were more advanced in trickery and that's what they did.
Speaker 4: They figured out a way to fake it. It was It's impossible today.
Speaker 8: You're forgiven in your state of fallen nature. You're forgiven in your ignorance and innocence. You're not forgiven if you know the truth. That's why it's all about, but does he know? There's a lot of fucking innocent people out there, answer.
A lot. They don't know. But do you know? If you know, then now you're participating in an upside down
Speaker 0: You know a moon landing denier? Oh, yeah. I mean, I know you know Alex Jones.
Speaker 1: I used to be a moon landing denier.
Speaker 3: I used to believe
Speaker 1: I used to believe totally that we never went to the moon. For years, I believe that we didn't go to them.
Speaker 2: What changed Jim?
Speaker 3: Mostly talking to Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Speaker 9: Here's a fair challenge here for Neil deGrasse Tyson. Why don't you get off from behind your screens and your scripts and debate Eric debate? You're scared. You won't debate. You don't have a script and lines and people telling you what
Speaker 10: to say. Your request, Tyson. Funny. 6 years ago, I I sent a whole bunch of questions for you to answer. And, I noticed you haven't answered answer to them.
You're not a scientist. You're an actor with a with a couple of science degrees. There's people with, those same qualifications, Burger King Burger King.
Speaker 1: It's like Burger King.
Speaker 11: So you
Speaker 10: don't impress me.
Speaker 6: You, disgrace, Carson. You are a rying, Jesuit thug, and a deceiver?
Speaker 2: Emil, you talk about Paris so much. Why don't you try eating the tree and get that?
Speaker 12: Answer. Hey, Neil. If the level of motion was playing and so easily debunked, so easily refuted, Then why don't you just debate Eric Dube?
Speaker 1: Gonna have Eric Dube, he said he's agreed to do it, talk with Neil deGrasse Tyson. What? I had asked you to debate one of them flat earth guys.
Speaker 3: No. I don't I can't I'd know. I know.
Speaker 13: Why the backpedaling meal? The show was scheduled, Posted on Joe's site, announced on air twice, and then you suddenly decided that you, quote, Don't debate flat Earthers. Joe announced it repeatedly on his show, and now they've disappeared. Now they don't say anything about it like it never happened.
Speaker 3: So what happened? I have the energy to fight all of it. I just teach people so that
Speaker 5: How to say?
Speaker 3: Plain it. Oh, well then okay. Well then how about and they start going down the list and, you know, I I've time time to go to dinner. You know?
Speaker 4: Neil deGrasse Tyson. Oh, he's such a genius with his printed out talking points, but when he actually has to debate, He fumbles and crumbles and stumbles and embarrasses himself and now blocks anybody who challenges him to a
Speaker 0: debate. Coward. It's not okay to say that the earth is flat. Oldest question that scientists have dared to ask.
Speaker 3: The task is to get people thinking straight in the 1st place. Train your mind.
Speaker 0: Apparently, this is something that we're debating. I I have no idea why.
Speaker 4: If you refuse to debate, that means you can't debate, And you know you can't debate, so you don't show up. Neil deGrasse Tyson, the latest example. Smartest man in the world, my ass. In fact, my ass might be smarter.
Speaker 9: I think that's the big weak point, especially when the ideas that you're Trying to defend are indefensible. You know, you you don't wanna have arguments about it. You wanna shut down the debate before the debate even happens.
Speaker 3: What you want, I think, are lifelong learners, lifelong curiosity. Yes.
Speaker 8: The curiosity we've all had is children. Oldest question the scientists have dared to ask. Child is more of a scientist than Neil deGrasse Tyson or any of those people. Those people are the opposite of scientists.
Speaker 3: They're all born scientists answers. And I say this often. You spend the 1st years of a child's life teaching it to walk and talk, then he spend the rest of his life telling it to shut up and sit down.
Speaker 0: I don't really know what's going on right now with this earth is flat thing, and it's not okay.
Speaker 4: They don't have the debate because they know they would lose it.
Speaker 3: You wanna debate something? Debate political policy.
Speaker 8: Policy is different. Debate that. Science.
Speaker 5: Science is mainly about gaining power, Gaining power over the world.
Speaker 11: Academia as the holder of truth plays in the central role particularly today.
Speaker 5: Earth is a giant ball of lava
Speaker 6: Mhmm.
Speaker 5: With a thin crust on the top, which we think of as, like, the surface. This thin crust, And it's mostly just a big ball of
Speaker 14: lava. That's Earth alone in space, fragile blue world in this vast blackness, this vacuum, velvety vacuum of space. That's a very powerful perception.
Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. Yeah. So so so this is not dust here. This this is Earth Seeing through the rings of Saturn.
Speaker 6: Earth. This
Speaker 3: this is Earth.
Speaker 11: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 9: Fires will be kindled to testify that 2 and 2 make 4. Storage will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in the summer.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Trillions of suns trillions of miles away all “orbiting” at unfathomable speeds in every direction
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Nobody has ever landed anything on the moon
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people doubt that humans have been to the moon, but the astronauts and experts disagree. In 1969, reflectors were placed on the moon's surface to prove the presence of man-made equipment. By firing a laser at these reflectors, scientists can detect the reflection and confirm the moon landing. The laser beam is too faint to be seen by the naked eye, but sensitive collectors can pick it up. This experiment provides definitive proof of the moon mission. However, there are still skeptics who question the authenticity of the moon landing, pointing out flaws in the construction of the lunar module and the footage of the redocking. Despite the doubts, NASA continues to develop technologies for future space exploration beyond low Earth orbit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It seems that there are some people that do not believe that man has actually been to the moon.
Speaker 1: I've met some of them.
Speaker 0: What do you
Speaker 1: think? I think they're crazy.
Speaker 0: What's that, Neil? We really went to the moon.
Speaker 2: There's no conspiracy here.
Speaker 3: We've been there.
Speaker 0: We've done that.
Speaker 2: So get over it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Thanks, conspiracy theories.
Speaker 2: Preparing to fire laser at the moon.
Speaker 1: Initiating laser on a retroreflector from Apollo 15.
Speaker 0: In 1969, the astronauts on Apollo 11 position reflectors on the surface of the moon. If we knew its exact location and we had a powerful For the laser, we could detect the reflection and prove there is man made equipment on the moon.
Speaker 3: When you think about it, this is Extraordinary. A laser is shot from earth and makes a round trip of over half a 1000000 miles.
Speaker 4: If we get a signal back, that means that we were in fact
Speaker 3: There. Precisely the ultimate proof of man's moon mission.
Speaker 0: Oh, very cool. Now we'll be able to see the beam when But it won't be strong enough when it comes back to be seen by the naked eye. In fact, it's something that can only be picked up by the most sensitive of collectors and hopefully, when we get that We'll see a spike like that. There's the spike.
Speaker 1: That's the return from Apollo 15.
Speaker 0: The moon, we get the moon. That is so cool. Is that your big experiment? However, line of those things, dude, people are fuck now. Like, the world's filled with literal idiots.
Do you think a laser can shoot 240,000 miles,
Speaker 4: a 1000000000 times more powerful than this is? That's what you gotta have to make it to the moon and back.
Speaker 0: You're telling me you're on a ball going 1,000 miles an hour And hit a little mirror and it can bounce back and hit your little box and you go, wow. We went to the moon. You you literally believe that. How do you believe that? Try and bounce a laser a 1000 yards and hit Where you started?
1,000 yards.
Speaker 5: Alright. Can you ping the ping the reflector? There it is. That's what? Like 500 meters away, would you say?
Speaker 0: 350. Okay. Now try and do 1 mile. The fact that we can do this is the only way of definitively proving that there are man made objects On the moon. Ultimate proof of man's moon mission.
Hey, Hoax. Hoax. New tune to what's happening
Speaker 3: In fright in front of us, not just thrilling, but conclusive. There's this fight.
Speaker 0: Take a minute and just think about how, a laser going A round trip of 500,000 miles on a ball spinning 1,000 miles an hour to Reflect back to a box and then they say that's proof that someone fucking played golf on the moon. It's fiction. It's Eyes, it's bullshit. No one went to the moon. You can't there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone's ever been to the moon.
There's actually no evidence that you can go to And this is the shit that distorts young minds. Those of you that have been vaccine damage, I'm being very playful.
Speaker 4: We'll prove that man actually was on the I
Speaker 0: wish we could do that.
Speaker 1: The Technologies that we're testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going beyond lower
Speaker 2: Shielding will be put to the test as the vehicle cuts through the waves of radiation. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.
Speaker 6: Early in the next decade, Instead of crude flights, we'll test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low earth orbit. We wanna get NASA out of low earth And go explore the heavens.
Speaker 7: Right now, we only can fly in earth orbit. That's the farthest that we can go. The moon, Mars, Asteroids. There's a lot of destinations that we could go to and we're building these building block components in order to allow us to
Speaker 0: do that eventually with eventually. Hello, Neil and Buzz. I'm talking to you by telephone from the oval room at the White House. And this certainly have to be the most historic telephone call ever made. Do the research.
You actually look into it like your buddy Joe Rogan did for a long time. Ridiculous. It looks Stupid. Looks ridiculous and dummy. There's no way people went on the moon.
There's no way. It's just lava borne. It's held together by literal tape.
Speaker 8: Look at that. That is tape, Tim, that's space tape, bud. Simple scotch tape haphazardly placed here and there as if it were a last minute job. Other than
Speaker 0: the foil, what is that? What is that? A
Speaker 3: Twinkie? No. I'm sure it's some super important and necessary high-tech device. Look at the buckling, Warping and indentation.
Speaker 8: There is no explanation for the sloppiness in the construction of the lunar module with the engines covered with aluminum foil. The external panels not even lining up with each other and the scotch tape that seems added at the last moment just to keep together pieces that would otherwise fall apart.
Speaker 0: And you can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly.
Speaker 3: Here we see the lunar lander redocking with the command module. This Is clearly fake and made with props, models and footage similar to the Hollywood creations of the day, such as Stanley Kubrick's 2001 Space Odyssey created in 1968, the year before the first supposed moon landing. Look at the jerky, unrealistic motions and lack of thrusters being used. The craft is just being turned like a Rubik's Cube somehow. All of this supposedly happening as they both orbit the moon at 4,000 miles per hour.
This is actual Official NASA footage of the Apollo 11 redolted.
Speaker 0: You you know there's gotta be people that are like, Dude, come on. You can't you can't be clean for only cars. You know, he's gonna believe that. Dude, there are people that trust me. Lost their mind when they saw You wake up?
When they looked at it, they're like, what? Yeah. What a good yes. Yeah. You wake up believe whatever we've shown.
They liked it. They go, let's make it fucking ridiculous. Let's Make it fucking ridiculous because it's almost humiliating, you know. Let's make it let's just show let's just, like, let's let's just convince these dummies of something so stupid, you Yeah. It's just rumour rumour.
It's humiliate us. Well, if I go out back and look up in the sky and see the moon, I, I either. I can remember where I was 20 years ago or I can pretend I've never been there. And it works for me either way. K to say telemetry data is even in existence.
And as I said, even if we had it, we don't have any change to play it back. But Your own research has shown the telemetry data is missing.
Speaker 2: That's right. We've been unable to track it down. I mean we don't know where This telemetry data ended up and we don't know what path it may have taken. So unfortunately, I'm afraid I can't really give you much of a clue To as to where this data ended up and whether it it still exists or not.
Speaker 8: Are we truly to believe that NASA has spent all this money To send a vehicle covered with loose pieces of cardboard into space.
Speaker 0: Who did you talk to? Hey. Do you have access to something We're passengers. We're we're guys going on a flight. We're not working the wrong way.
You don't miss please. Somebody like me. And this makes you a real famous person Discover this stuff. The fuck out.
Speaker 2: I'm going to give you the opportunity to
Speaker 9: get the hell not that.
Speaker 0: I don't give a damn about all that shit. I have no idea what
Speaker 2: you're talking about. I think
Speaker 0: you must be some kind of wacko.
Speaker 7: You quote me and
Speaker 8: say it's bullshit.
Speaker 9: You want for your lawyer to sue me?
Speaker 0: I hope you do. I love
Speaker 9: you to go to court and show a window You're a coward and a liar and a thief.
Speaker 2: Put your hand on the Bible. Swear to God you walked on the moon. Mr. Saverhill, knowing you that's probably Well, yes, $5,000 cash.
Speaker 0: You can give it to charity. You can swear
Speaker 2: on the Bible that you walked on the moon. Mr. Seibel, you do don't deserve answers.
Speaker 0: Okay. Turn off the camera. Your interview is done. Just get your ass out of my house. Okay.
I don't get people, but you're going to be on the deck unless you Don't get it done before they get out of the office. I go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we, destroyed that technology. And, It's a paper process to build it back again.
Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 10: I'm really happy to see, what what we see from the moon And of course, looking back on the Earth.
Speaker 1: That's us. That's home. 232,000 miles away from Earth.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Our great grandparents would be so impressed by how far we’ve come
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Who’s really behind flat earth?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the prevalence of flat earth videos on YouTube and the impact of misinformation. It highlights that around 1 in 10 Americans believe the earth is flat, with the percentage increasing among young people. The speakers discuss the role of YouTube in promoting extreme content and the need for improved algorithms and regulations to combat misinformation. They also touch on censorship and the fear of being mocked or criticized. The video concludes with a discussion on the importance of open conversation and the potential threat it poses to those in power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who is really behind flat earth? YouTube. There are way more videos on YouTube for flat earth than for climate change. There's generally more people watching flat earth videos than videos about the climate. That is wild to me.
Speaker 1: I see Science literacy is a kind of vaccine.
Speaker 0: Vaccinate people against misinformation.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be, robot polisher.
Speaker 0: Around 1 in 10 10 Americans believe that the earth is flat. Unfortunately, that is not a made up statistic. 16% that the world was flat. It goes up for young people, all
Speaker 3: the way to 34%. Only 64% are convinced that the world is a ball. The world is The circle that lures us. What is this? A spheroid?
Yes. About the Earth being flat and getting out of control. Can you please help
Speaker 0: What happened? YouTube recommends some pretty wild videos to people. They watch it and it suggests even more extreme content. Down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories. They keep watching it.
It gets more out of control as time goes. Further and further down that rabbit hole, how do we All of that. We can pressure government and social media platforms because it's not just YouTube, it's Twitter, it's Facebook, it's all of them. We can pressure them to improve their algorithms and their regulations to be harder on misinformation.
Speaker 3: YouTube's credit realized we've That's a real problem
Speaker 4: here. Already sufficiently motivated to invest the necessary resources and people in Adjusting the premise. I don't
Speaker 1: know how you're dealing with all these conspiracy theorists on your platform.
Speaker 4: So the the first way is by demoting low quality content and promoting more It's orientated content introducing boxes that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual such as searching for the earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of
Speaker 1: Your response is to put a box saying, nope, the earth is not Flat.
Speaker 4: Correct.
Speaker 1: Okay. That's that's that's correct.
Speaker 5: Because censorship is the key. It's the linchpin to maintaining power for them.
Speaker 3: All of that, it was hours
Speaker 1: of content. It's all Banned out.
Speaker 3: Crazy is that. I know, right? Head Earthers get banned on YouTube. Why are they banning it? Are they hiding?
Somebody's trying to cover something up. Absolutely. Because if it was so ridiculous, then it would allow the counter narrative and it would allow discourse and discussion. Why is it that? Why?
Yeah.
Speaker 1: Why, Ally? Why would
Speaker 3: they do that? Google cares about it. Alex Zack wanna cancel my fucking Instagram, which How I actually make money, you know. But go look on my Instagram, they wanna cancel my shit, you know. Why?
You're not you're not inciting any kind of violence. Well, I talked about the Angles of light Really? And some. Yes. They wanna they wanna shut.
They said if I do it again, they're taking my Instagram, there goes all my money. No way. Now look at my post, Rather than that, I could see it if you were saying, you know, attack a group of people or, you know, you're You can go on Instagram. Or whatever. I could see it, but but that You can see porn on Instagram, but I put something about flat earth, and they wanna they wanna fucking take it down and take it down.
Well, doesn't it doesn't that kinda Play into that theory of control. I mean, they kinda wanna dumb us down and they want control. Right? It's a red flag, brother. You can always tell authority.
You can always tell who in charge. Whatever you can't touch, whatever you touch and it hit your back, you just touch power. A man could be If anyone. It could be a dog, it could be a woman, it could be it
Speaker 1: could be anything you want, but
Speaker 3: you better not see that dirt is flat. Did If you ever wanna be persecuted, go in the public media and state that the earth is not a guru.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say this is anti intellectual And it's anti science.
Speaker 3: Go read a book, an actual book.
Speaker 1: It should embarrass you. It should embarrass your families. It should embarrass the fine schools you went to. It should embarrass That's the NBA. I don't think this is funny actually.
Like, we could laugh at it but I don't think it's funny.
Speaker 3: Because they can't have any pushback. They cannot have it.
Speaker 6: Let's take a quick moment of silence for that thought.
Speaker 1: And that's the dumbest thing a public figure has Said in my lifetime, it is one of them. I really don't think it's fun. When
Speaker 3: you're right that they target you.
Speaker 4: There are a lot of flatter of Nazis.
Speaker 3: Flat earth Nazis?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah. We're talking fringe of the fringe.
Speaker 3: It's amazing. It really is amazing how their reaction shows how effective this stuff is.
Speaker 1: I'll just Ponder the potential realities of
Speaker 3: the world and its possible roundness. Spinning. That mean you don't believe in slavery? Does that mean you don't believe in in in in in the revolutionary war? You have to question this.
That is a stupid comment. Don't say it again.
Speaker 1: A very small step to becoming a holocaust denier or some reason.
Speaker 3: Don't do it. Why would you be Banned for that or or or demonetize. I I I can't grasp that for the life of me. You'd be wrong all you want when you're right that they target
Speaker 5: Did you understand how important censorship was for the people currently in charge to keep The power. I mean, they seem to think it's the most important thing.
Speaker 7: They do. And, I mean, there's a reason for that. You know? It it mockery And and and criticism, you know, it can expose foolishness. It can make you look silly.
I think that's the big weak Point, especially when the ideas that you're trying to defend are indefensible. You know, you you don't wanna have arguments about it. You wanna shut down the debate before the debate even happens.
Speaker 3: It asked you to debate one of them flat earth guys.
Speaker 1: No. I don't I can't I no. You're gonna have them on Skype. No. That is something that should not be debated.
Does not belong in front of an audience getting debated. I don't have the energy to fight all of that. I just teach people to How
Speaker 3: to speak.
Speaker 1: Blaine, oh, well then okay. Well then, how about they start going down the list. And, you know, I I have time time to go to dinner, you know?
Speaker 7: Empowered these activists by basically giving them a sword and a shield. Right? They can Break down anything as misinformation or hate speech that they want. They can smear you all that they want. And then they have a shield on the other hand where you can't make fun of them, you can't criticize them, or you get banned.
Speaker 5: Maybe that's what they fear. They don't wanna be mocked.
Speaker 6: Fuck, this is really cold.
Speaker 1: There's nothing I like more than space.
Speaker 3: Those little minds? In fact But it almost looks like Star Wars. Like, when you watch it, it it looks
Speaker 1: like it's something out of a science fiction film.
Speaker 6: It looks absolutely unreal and animated.
Speaker 3: You think that's A hit in elementary school. It is not a sleek spacecraft by any means. It's like like an Astro. It's not.
Speaker 1: And I
Speaker 4: That's cool. But it's actually a super complicated thing. Like, you did some cool analogies, cool math
Speaker 3: to figure this out.
Speaker 4: Very well practiced in buckling those
Speaker 3: No. You're right. Almost water it. Bro, that's true. Yeah.
Speaker 6: Meet gay scientists.
Speaker 1: Hispanic talkers.
Speaker 3: We need black engineers.
Speaker 1: Is it the future? Is it The key to
Speaker 3: reaching the stars? Or is it just 5 totally awesome days away from mom and dad? It just felt really nice to see someone else in
Speaker 1: the room Using those pronouns and it
Speaker 3: I made sure to introduce myself with my pronouns. I think that, you know, after what we've seen lately, especially, you know, In the media, people are questioning science now. Lots of people are. I certainly am. Yeah.
Yeah. After, you know I mean, I think we've seen in the media and in the government, what we've seen these past two and a half, 3 years. I mean, who knows what the fuck they're really talking about?
Speaker 5: It's not about sensitivity. It's about controlling you. It's totalitarian.
Speaker 3: Can't we just have an open conversation in this country anymore? No. Not at all.
Speaker 5: This is threatening their power because they have an open conversation. They can't win. Of course. They'll lose.
Speaker 3: You can be wrong all you want. It's when you're right That they target you.
Speaker 2: Not everybody can be, robot party show.
Speaker 4: The mistake we made was we didn't catch them fast enough, and we've improved our systems to make sure that we do.
Speaker 3: Hey, Elmo. Yeah?
Speaker 1: You know what this is?
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
…but like, how would they fake it?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss various topics related to space exploration. They mention a model spacecraft used for photography and the ability to add different backgrounds to the scene. They also talk about being on the International Space Station and the launch of the Artemis mission. The video includes footage of the launch and the crew heading to the blunt escape room. The speakers emphasize that not everyone can be a robot polisher and mention the simplicity of certain tasks. Overall, the video provides a brief overview of space-related subjects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Grab a dummy. Not even heard.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can be, a robot polisher.
Speaker 2: The Falcon, in which the intrepid adventurers are traveling, is in fact the model designed and built by a Hollywood special effects cast.
Speaker 3: And we'd like to compliment NASA on the orbiter model that they got for us to take these pictures. No. It is not a model. We saw Oh, with their own eyes. That's what it was.
Speaker 2: It is kind of a sweet spacecraft by any means. Photographing the model against a blue screen, it will later be possible to add different backgrounds, and other moving objects to the scene. Is this the whole are you really in space? Next on Jonathan Bird's Blue World, Jonathan goes to inner space.
Speaker 0: I'm standing on the International Space Station.
Speaker 3: All the lack he said was the bullet hoop to to run down the length of her body to prove there are no Hidden wires are strained attached.
Speaker 2: What's a Kansas City shop? Kansas City shop. Never thought it was a surprise. You go away. I Never heard.
What's up with people hearing that? Like every great space mission, it starts with a launch. And
Speaker 0: here we go.
Speaker 2: And
Speaker 0: How did you burn off the tires initiated? 7, 6, 5. Four stage engine start. 3, 2, 1. Boosters and ignition.
And liftoff of Artemis one. We rise Eyes together back to the moon and beyond.
Speaker 2: It conjures a cloud of smoke. A flash. She's gone.
Speaker 0: But where did she go?
Speaker 4: Once the crew are on board, They get out and head down this tube. Three and a half minutes after they get the warning in the capsule, The crew could be down here in the blunt escape room.
Speaker 1: And not everybody can be, a robot, Polisher.
Speaker 0: You are dumb. It's not hard.