reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @RochelleAz
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Donald Trump cleaned up D.C. The results are undeniable and voters are noticing. https://t.co/SlP6eNupXb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump decided to take over Washington DC, clean it up, and the results are presented as: "Robbery is down by 46%. Carjackings are down by 83%." The speaker asserts these results are undeniable and questions how the left can ignore them, suggesting Trump should apply the same approach to Seattle and San Francisco: "start with Seattle and San Francisco. Clean them up." In DC, the streets are described as safe, with "People in the streets are like, yo, this is fantastic. I can walk around now," and "Black people in the street like, yo, this is the safest I've ever seen DC." The speaker proclaims, "This is incredible. President Trump should remain president," notes that Biden and Harris administration "didn't give a damn about DC," and concludes the nation’s capital should always be clean and safe. "God bless America."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Donald Trump, he decided to take over the nation's capital. He decided to take over Washington DC, clean it up. And ever since he did, you know, you have the left, you know, they're always complaining about something. There's nothing new there. But what is new is the actual results.
Take a look at this. Robbery is down by 46%. Carjackings are down by 83%. Are you serious right now? Here's what I wanna know.
It absolutely blows my mind. How can you be on the left? Right? As crazy as y'all are, how can you be over there though? See these results.
Alright? They're undeniable. They're in your face. See these results and go, I don't like that. How can you do that?
Instead, you should see these results and go, you know what? I wonder if Donald Trump can apply that to every city in The United States. And if you ask me, I think you should start with Seattle and San Francisco. Clean them up. This is absolutely phenomenal work.
If you think the people in DC are upset about it, they're not. People in the streets are like, yo, this is fantastic. I can walk around now. It's safe. Black people in the street like, yo, this is the safest I've ever seen DC.
This is incredible. President Trump should remain president. They're saying all kinds of wild shit. Was like, president Trump, y'all vote for him three times and all come on, man. But it's incredible work.
Donald Trump cleaned up DC. And that just lets you know, like, could this have been done with Biden? Yeah. But they don't care. Biden and Harris administration didn't give a damn about DC.
The nation's capital should always be clean. It should be the safest. But here we are, Donald Trump, he just went and cleaned it up. He said, don't worry about it. I'm gonna show you how the nation capital should look.
God bless America.
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Why has John Kerry just locked his account and hidden his posts, days after disgraced Ex FBI agent Peter Strzok deleted all posts from his? 🤔 https://t.co/JQjkxpH85C
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
As a healthcare professional my heart breaks for these vaccine injured kids, their parents, and for this Physician. When you take care of children you wear your heart on your sleeve— some days it affects your life and your health. Pray for the health of our children. https://t.co/z136Ulmjvq
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Tucker Carlson on X Ep. Just dropped. JD Vance is trying to stop another $60 BILLION of American Tax payer dollars from going to Ukraine. Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell should hang there heads in shame for trying to deceive Americans. Listen 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/k3mNOvHfyn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia, even with extensive Western support. The situation is dire, with a significant loss of life among Ukrainians. Recently, the U.S. Senate proposed sending an additional $60 billion to Ukraine, despite its corrupt government and ongoing issues. There's a chance to stop this legislation in the Senate, but if it passes, the House could potentially improve or reject it. This funding not only supports Ukraine for 2024 but also ties future presidents' hands, limiting their diplomatic options. Many senators seem to believe prolonging the war serves Ukraine's interests, ignoring the reality that it leads to further destruction and suffering. Ultimately, the motivations appear to align more with military contractors than the well-being of Ukrainians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It became very clear to anyone paying attention several months ago that Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia. The Ukrainian military will not be able, even with western backing 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of it, to expel the Russian military from parts of Eastern Ukraine. Ukraine doesn't have the industrial capacity, neither does NATO or the United States, and it doesn't have the people. Russia has a 100,000,000 more in population than Ukraine does. And that means that further support from the West for the Ukrainian military only means more dead Ukrainians and a further degraded Western economy in the US and in Germany, particularly.
So it's not simply a fool's errand. It's self destruction. It's insane. It's cruel. It's abetting the killing of an entire generation of Ukrainians.
This is very obvious. No honest person at this point will deny it. And yet somehow the United States Senate, which is always several years behind reality and its perception just a few weeks ago decided to send another $60,000,000,000 to the Ukrainian government, which is both corrupt and authoritarian. They've canceled elections. They banned an entire Christian denomination, and then they killed an American journalist for noting any of this.
And yet, the United States Senate proposed under Mitch McConnell a plan to send another $60,000,000,000 to Ukraine. Well, imagine the surprise. Well, all rational people around the world to wake up this morning and discover this could actually happen. And so with that in mind, we thought it'd be worth talking to one of the very few Republican senators who's bothered to make the counter case, and that would be JD Vance of Ohio who joins us now from the United States. Senator, thanks so much for coming on.
If you wouldn't mind telling us where this legislation is right now, what you expect to happen, and what you think should happen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Tucker. So there are 2 big things that will happen here. So tonight, we will clear a major procedural vote or we won't. So this is really the best opportunity tonight to kill this legislation. Encourage everybody to do everything that they can, contact everyone they can to ensure that we actually do kill the legislation.
It is very close. The Democrats have banded together with 17 Republicans. We only need 8 of those Republicans to flip their vote to kill this thing, and I think that we'll get at least 1, who will in fact flip their votes. So that that that's where it sits in the Senate. The second thing and frankly, the best opportunity we have to kill this is in the house, and that's part of what I'm trying to do is notify people about how bad this legislation is, so that after it clears the Senate, if it does, then it goes to the House and the House has a real opportunity to at least make it better, but hopefully kill it.
And I I wanna say just just a couple of things here, Tucker, that are extremely important to know about this legislation. Number 1, is that it sends $61,000,000,000 to Ukraine to fund, as you said, a hopeless war in Eastern Europe that will decimate the Ukrainian population even more than it's already been decimated. So it's a terrible terrible piece of legislation on the policy. The second thing I wanna say, Tucker, though, is that it doesn't just fund Ukraine in 2024, and this is the most important point. It actually funds Ukraine in 25 and 26.
Now, what's the problem with that? Say, for example, that we have a new president in 2025, that president would be handcuffed by the promises that we are making in law to Ukraine today. If you go back to to 2019, Tucker, to sort of give you a sense of why this matters. In 2019, the US House impeached then President Donald Trump on the theory that they had appropriated money to Ukraine and Donald Trump refused to send it to Ukraine. So if Trump is elected President again and become President on January of 2025, he will conduct diplomacy and if that diplomacy does not include sending additional 1,000,000,000 to Ukraine, there is a theoretical argument, a predicate, if you will, for impeaching Donald Trump because they have tried to tie his hands.
And the final point I'll make on this, Tucker, is that the Washington Post has already has already said, based on leaks from inside the intel community, the purpose of this legislation is to tie a future President Trump's hands. We're not just sending 1,000,000,000 to Ukraine in 2024, we're trying to make it impossible for the next president to conduct diplomacy on his terms. It's anti democratic and it will lead to endless war in the all over the world.
Speaker 0: So the political calculation behind this seems incredibly dark, so does the humanitarian effect. I noticed that no one on Capitol Hill seems interested in finding out how many have died in this war. Reliable estimates in the area, these are not partisan, are that about 400,000 Ukrainians have died. That's about as many Americans has died in the entire second World War over the entire duration, and it's, of course, a much smaller country. So how do senators, Republican senators, get away with saying we're doing this on behalf of Ukrainian people, on behalf of democracy when it's destroying an entire generation and it's not a democracy?
Like, what's the thinking here?
Speaker 1: Well, Tucker, they bought into the propaganda that what is in the best interest of Ukraine is to prolong this war. And so Zelensky comes to Washington. You know, he's tougher than a lot of them are, and I think they get, you know, a a little bit of excitement from that. And Zelensky tells them a story that his war is in the best interest of the whole of Ukraine. Now never mind that there are people within Ukraine protesting the draft, never mind that the average age of a soldier there is pushing 45 years old, and never mind that the 650,000 wealthiest Ukrainians left the country at the beginning of the war, they didn't stay and fight.
So the idea that this is unanimously supported by the Ukrainian population is, of course, preposterous and absurd. No one believes it. But but here's here's the really crazy and I and I think ultimately the very cynical thing that's going on, Tucker, is that everyone knows that this war will lead to the destruction of Ukraine. I've had conversations with democratic colleagues where they get this sort of dark look in their eyes and they say, effectively, that they wanna fight Russia to the last Ukrainian drop of blood. I I I think if you really ask these guys, they recognize that this is not in the best interest of Ukraine.
This is fundamentally in the interest of military contractors and people who think that America's most pressing challenge is to defeat the Russians. Of course, that's not a preoccupation that I share. I don't think Russia should have invaded, Tucker, but I also think that we gotta be much more focused on more pressing problems, like the demographic collapse of the United States, like the open borders, and like what's going on in East Asia. So it's a massive campaign, Tucker, to distract people from the real problems in the world and the real problems that exist in this country.
Speaker 0: And underlying it all, as you just said, is is an impulse that's that's indefensible and I think deeply immoral. So I I'm so grateful for you having the courage to talk about this in public, and I and I hope common sense in your position prevails. Senator, JD Vance of Ohio. Thank you. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization.
Societies are defined by what they will not permit. Local blockchain is the total inversion of virtue.
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Hannity asked House Republicans if they expect Joe Biden to be impeached. Nearly everyone raised their hand. It’s time to get this done. https://t.co/N5VzhM8IkV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks the audience if they believe that the situation is heading in a certain direction. The entire room raises their hands in agreement. Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for everyone's presence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Continue. Let me scan the room. How many of you think that that's where this is headed? Please raise your hand. Wow.
The whole room. Thank you all. Appreciate you being with us.
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Gavin Newsom is in China linking up with the Chinese company he gave $1 billion taxpayer funded contract to for face masks to during Covid. Elitist scum while his once great State parishes. https://t.co/i1VqMpIKJ3
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Hamas is kidnapping Israeli women off of the streets. The horrific terrorism in Israel right now is why Americans were so concerned with Joe Biden releasing 6 billion to Iran. Who do you think paid for those rockets?
@RochelleAz - Rochellemaryn 🌹🕊️
Chip Roy has had enough of the pleasantries and he is spot on. “The President and his administration can go straight to hell!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the president for not caring about the southern border, claiming that cartels are becoming more powerful as a result. They mention a film called "Down to Freedom" that exposes the situation at the border. The speaker accuses the president and his administration of allowing the abuse of young girls and children, as well as the flow of drugs like fentanyl. They express frustration with Republicans who only pay lip service to the issue and support it for cheap labor. The speaker emphasizes the need to regain control of the border and mentions Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s support for this cause.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But these cartels are emboldened, and they are empowered by a president who does not care about our southern border. He is allowing it to become completely run by the cartels. And if anybody has not seen this down to freedom, go see it. Go see what's thing in the world. Go see who has the power.
Go see who is, you know, abusing these young girls, these young children. We're allowing that to happen on our situation because he dares to try to stop the flow at our border, to stop the death, the fentanyl, stop poisonings, to stop arm intruders. You know, as a president and this administration, you go straight to hell. We have a job to do. In congress with my message, installed by our my colleagues, we are not going to fund a government that's at war with the people of Texas.
We are not going to fund a government that's perpetuating the lawlessness and power cartels, allowing fentanyl to kill Americans, and allow little girls to get rapists dash houses in Texas. Enough. This is our fight, and I'm tired other Republicans who are giving lip service to it and for years have been supporting it because they want cheap labor. We need to re control our border. Even Robert F.
Kennedy Junior gets us to steward. Yeah. We have an obligation to have a secure