reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @RossDyerTV
@RossDyerTV - Ross Dyer
So, all those “anti-vaxxers” (who were misreading the data, spreading “misinformation” - & whom deserved to be censored, fired & cancelled (or to “face consequences” as the fascist politicians & media called it) - it turns out they were right. #vaccines https://t.co/TKYHKum3ae
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response, etcetera. So it's possible, in fact, it's looking likely that the vaccine might suppress the immune system. This fact, the authors concluded, will quote, have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Now again, we sincerely hope that's not true, but it's not just the conclusion of 1 scientific journal. The Lancet, maybe the most famous scientific journal in the world, released similar findings in February.
The Lancet's piece was entitled quote, risk of infection, hospitalization, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID nineteen vaccine. A physician called Kenji Yamamoto made this observation about the data from The Lancet. He wrote this in a letter to the journal of virology, and we're quoting, the study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of 2 doses of COVID nineteen vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. Now your first response, if you're a humane person to align like that has got to be deep sympathy, because people were misled, they were forced, they were forced. Medical ethics turned out the window.
People were forced to take medicine they didn't want, and some of them may have been hurt by it. And you don't have to take this man's word for it. Pull up the Lancet study yourself. You won't find anything of the text of the article saying what Kenji Yamamoto said, which is weird. Why would the Lancet wanna hide a major finding like that?
We can't say. But if you look at table 3 in the piece, here's what you'll find buried in the data. Among people around the age of 80 who've been double vaccinated, that would include people like Joe Biden, the per capita rate of medical incidences, including hospitalizations or death, is nearly twice as high as the rate of serious incidents for the unvaccinated. This is 180 days after vaccination. What is that?
And why is no one interested?