TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Rothbard1776

Rothbard1776
Posted - December 11, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Saved - December 12, 2025 at 1:48 AM

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

“Introducing the Arizonan Israel Public Affairs Committee.” Erika Kirk (Frantzve) Yair Netanyahu Tyler Bowyer June 13th, 2019. https://t.co/7Fng2Vur3c

Rothbard1776
Posted - October 25, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Saved - October 26, 2025 at 3:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread of heated accusations and insults: one participant claims every sentence in a post is a lie and accuses others of pressuring donors and media to censor those not pro-Israel. Another says they’ve endured extreme abuse for five years. The exchange escalates to claims of instability, labeling someone a ZOA/Likud terrorist, and assertions about Jewish factions and anti-Jewish sentiment. A final, lengthy post ambivalently links Likud, Begin, and other controversial figures to conspiratorial histories.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Every single sentence in this tweet a lie. This person also relentlessly attacked Charlie Kirk and supported the pressure campaign from his donors and the media to censor/deplatform anyone who wasn’t explicitly pro-Israel.

@SloanRachmuth - Sloan Rachmuth

Now @TPUSA's Ohio Director calls me an "Israeli" because I'm Jewish - like I'm a foreigner in my own damn country!! Gabe says Jews don't belong in America and that our loyalty to this country is suspect. Gabe deliberately equates Judaism with treason, which is a classic European mistake. Gabe says when Republican American Jews complain about foreign policy or antisemitism, it makes young Republicans hate us. Gabe with @TPUSA says American Jews should shut up, or else. Is this TPUSA's position?? @AndrewKolvet please call your dog off. For 24 hours, @GabeGuidarini has been out here harassing Jews for objecting to Tucker. #TPUSA

@GabeGuidarini - Gabe Guidarini

You know, if the slightest skepticism of U.S. involvement in Middle East affairs wasn’t met with this type of wild vitriol from Israeli surrogates, maybe you wouldn’t have a generational support crisis among young Americans. Might warrant some introspection. Just my thoughts.

@Saorsa1776 - Kari Baxter Donovan

@Rothbard1776 @Stacylynne91 The insane abuse from her that I have taken as a journalist spans 5 years.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

@Saorsa1776 @Stacylynne91 To say she’s unstable would be an understatement.

@Stacylynne91 - Annie bliss

@Rothbard1776 @Saorsa1776 She’s a literal ZOA/Likud terrorist.

@Saorsa1776 - Kari Baxter Donovan

@Stacylynne91 @Rothbard1776 I dont know what Likud is - but she doesn't like Jews either - and they don't like her. Her sect of "Judiasm" is highly intolerant of American Jews. https://indyweek.com/news/durham/little-jewish-day-school-durham-became-embroiled-international-controversy/

How a Little Jewish Day School in Durham Became Embroiled in an International Controversy On October 7, the ultraconservative website Frontpage Mag published an unusual article titled “BDS Infests a Jewish Day School.” FPM typically aims its outrage at national and international issues (recent headlines include “Pope Francis’ Jihad on Christianity” and “Why the Left Loathes Western Civilization”). But this piece had a much smaller target: the Lerner School, […] indyweek.com

@Stacylynne91 - Annie bliss

Likud is the government faction led by Netanyahu and originally formed under Menachem Begin. It follows the “militant Zionist” and “revisionist Zionism” ideologies of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, Menachem Begin’s mentor, the leader of BETAR (which shares its HQ with Likud) and the founder of IRGUN ZVAI LEUMI (Zionist paramilitary terrorism faction). Menachem Begin was Britain’s #1 “Most Wanted” terrorist before Israel was officially created in 1948, then went on to become its 6th Prime Minister. Trump’s Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, led the Likud/Netanyahu reelection campaign in Israel in 2020. NOTE: Bibi Netanyahu was a 9/11 hijacker with an Israeli Special Forces called Sayeret Matkal, under the command of Ehud Barak. (Sayeret Matkal were the hijackers who shot the pilots and took over the planes.)

@Stacylynne91 - Annie bliss

Ah, I see you’ve met my good friend and ZOA/Betar/Likud lunatic Sloan Rachmuth.🤣 (Hammer and Wax are both ZOA too.) Yikes. She’s a fucking disaster, Mel. Wait until you get to the part where you find out she and her husband (Guy Rachmuth) were involved in the Boston Marathon bombing. And that Guy Rachmuth builds “brain chips” at IQVIA, working for 9/11 co-conspirator ARI BOUSBIB. And she and Loomer are de facto “handlers” for DataRepublican lmao.

Rothbard1776
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 5:44 AM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 9:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the most significant development in Charlie Kirk's assassination is a clip where Candace Owens claims to have multiple sources with written communications from Charlie expressing fears for his life just before he was murdered. This aligns with prior conversations suggesting he felt endangered by pro-Israel forces due to his changing views. The authenticity of these messages, if verified, could reshape the narrative around his death. It's crucial to investigate these claims thoroughly, as they raise serious questions about the circumstances leading to his assassination.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

The most important development yet to drop in the assassination of Charlie Kirk is this clip right here, where @RealCandaceO states that she has multiple sources who claim to have written communications from Charlie the day before he was murdered stating that he thought “they” were going to kill him [with one of those sources being a TPUSA donor]. This would also corroborate the conversation that Infowars news anchor @HarrisonHSmith had [who is not affiliated with TPUSA] one month before Charlie Kirk was killed, where he was told that Charlie thought Israel would kill him if he abandoned the pro-Israel cause [which led to Harrison’s now infamous tweet stating just that back on 8/13/2025]. Candace has no discernible incentive to lie about the existence and veracity of these messages. She already produced the text exchange proving that Charlie was getting intense pressure from his Jewish donors and expressed a desire to abandon the pro-Israel cause just 48 hours before he was killed. This was a fact that everyone in the pro-Israel camp denied for almost a month following Charlie’s death, up to and including Bibi Netanyahu. We now know most of those people were either outright lying or uniformed. In both cases, the existence and verification of those messages by TPUSA spokesman and Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has changed the entire conversation. Why did the people in the group chat or those who knew about Charlie’s evolving views lie about it? I think there’s a strong possibility that these [alleged] messages will see the light at some point, assuming these individuals aren’t in legitimate fear for their own lives and/or have the courage to come forward. At a minimum, these communications should be provided to law enforcement if they haven’t been already as part of the investigation [assuming the FBI actually plans to conduct a real one]. If so, we may end up seeing them in court. We know Candace has extensive connections and relationships within the TPUSA network, including with donors, as is evident by the recent letter from @JohnMappin and @ImMappin. To doubt the authenticity of this claim, which she says is in writing from two sources and known by at least 3, would be extremely naive, IMO. It doesn’t make sense for her to lie about this. The liability is far too great. Given the above, it appears to be almost a certainty that Charlie Kirk thought that there was a possibility he was going to be murdered by pro-Israel forces, at least in part due to the decision he had made to distance himself and TPUSA from the Israeli/Jewish cause. Now you need to ask yourself, what would make Charlie feel that way? Why would he feel strongly enough about the possibility of being assassinated that he would communicate that in both conversation and in writing, including to at least one TPUSA donor? Bear in mind, confiding in a wealthy donor to the organization about your fear of being killed is no small decision. Did something happen to Charlie that created this fear? It’s logical to ask, was he ever explicitly [or implicitly] threatened? Was he aware of similar things happening to others? If the above is true … what are the odds he was actually assassinated by a random 22 year-old trans loving furry Zoomer on the following day, on a campus 4 hours away from where Tyler Robinson lived, at a school he wasn’t a student at? If Charlie’s fears were true and warranted, I think we’d be foolish to ignore them. Who would be in a better position to know “from who” and “why” he could be at risk than Charlie himself? Every thread should be pulled and every stone lifted and turned. Charlie’s memory, family, friends and supporters deserve nothing less.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three people told me off record. Two have this in a written communication from Charlie. One, who was a Turning Point USA donor. The very day before Charlie Kirk died, he expressed that he thought he was going to be killed. He told these people, "I think they're going to kill me." He had not expressed that to me. So I am telling you this based off the testimony of three people. I hope those people come forward with that. Those conversations were off record; I honor that. But I am hoping that they will tell us who was they—Who is the they that he thought were going to kill him?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna say one more thing rather explosively. Three people told me off record. Two people who have this in a written communication from Charlie. One, who was a Turning Point USA donor, and I would say very much one of the white knights in this. The very day before Charlie Kirk died, he expressed that he thought he was going to be killed. He told these people, I think they're going to kill me. Okay. He had not expressed that to me. So I am telling you this based off the testimony of three people. And I am saying this because I hope that these people who I think are good will be inspired to come forward with that. Again, those conversations I had were off record. I honor that. If I say it's off record, stays off record. But I'm hoping that watching what I am doing and feeling the energy that is rising across the world for people who want to know what the heck happened on nineten that they will be brave and they will say, yeah, Charlie did the day before he died think that he was gonna be killed and maybe tell us who was they? Well, for once and for all, who was they? Who is the they that he thought were going to kill him?
Rothbard1776
Posted - June 16, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post from Tulsi Gabbard less than 90 days ago. I noted that two recent comments, one from Bannon questioning her absence at a Camp David meeting and Tucker suggesting a regime change effort, might not be directly related. I also reflected on Tulsi's views on Trump and Iran from 2020, as well as her Senate statement where she asserted that Iran wasn't pursuing nuclear weapons. Just three months later, claims emerged that Israel was on the brink of a nuclear threat, and many seemed to accept it without question.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

This was from Tulsi Gabbard less than 90 days ago. https://t.co/Ekc1jjekoY

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

These two things probably aren’t related.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

BANNON: “Why was Tulsi Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting?” TUCKER: “You know why … This is a regime change effort. Why not just say that?” https://t.co/lnZ8JXrWGs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tulsi Gabbard wasn't invited to Camp David because her last public statement claimed the program wasn't back up and running. According to Beebe on Fox, the program was twelve to thirteen months away, not happening this weekend. The situation involves a decapitation of total leadership, not just the nuclear program, indicating a total regime change. The speaker questions the lack of transparency with the American people regarding this plan. The speaker asserts the aim is regime change and challenges the feasibility of a regime change war in Iran, a country of 90,000,000 people. They claim that US and Israel-backed wars in Syria have caused an economic, political, and demographic crisis in Europe, destroying European Christian culture.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why was Tulsi Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting all day? You know why? Why Tulsi Gabbard still to the American public is is has said the last public statement is that the the program was not back up and running. And now we have from from Beebe by himself on Fox by Brent Baer that the thing was twelve to thirteen months away. It wasn't this weekend. Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: And this is by his own thing. And we also know that it was a decapitation. As we said on Friday, it wasn't just about the nuclear program. It's a decapitation of total leadership. So this is a total regime change, which, by the way, you may have a plan for regime change is fine, but you gotta bring the American people on. Let me go back. Speaker 1: I by the way, I said that publicly last week. This is the point of this is regime change. I know everyone involved. Oh, you're a holocaust denier for saying that. Stop. Let's have a rational conversation about what our aims are here and maybe you can convince me that we need to support a regime change war in Iran. Tell me how that plays out in a country of 90,000,000 people. Have you thought it through? Do you even care? And the answer is no. We have a economic and political and demographic crisis in Europe because of US backed, Israel backed Syria. Wars Yes. In The Middle East. Yep. That's what's destroyed Europe where my ancestors came from. And I I spent a lot of time there, and I love European culture, which is Christian culture. And it's destroyed that. And, you know, shut up. You're not allowed to care. You know, who's making the rules here?

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Tulsi on Trump and Iran back in 2020. https://t.co/koaiNWyeZI

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Tulsi’s statement to the US Senate.

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

All the more alarming for showing the extreme efficacy of war propaganda: Trump's DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, told the Senate in March that Iran isn't trying to acquire nukes. 3 months later, Israels claims they were milliseconds away, and so many just nod: https://t.co/nf19Zp36fK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The IC assesses that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003. The IC continues to closely monitor whether Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 02/2003. The IC continues to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.
Rothbard1776
Posted - March 8, 2025 at 4:29 AM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 7:01 AM

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Mark Kelly accused Tulsi Gabbard of spreading Russian and Iranian propaganda during her confirmation for telling the truth about Obama & the CIA destabilizing Syria by trying to overthrow Assad, warning it would lead to chaos and the persecution of Christians. Tulsi was right. https://t.co/InNJgTtZyH

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was shocked to learn that President Obama had programs to overthrow the Syrian regime. The CIA's Timber Sycamore program armed Al Qaeda to start another regime change war in the Middle East. The DOD's train and equip program spent over half a billion dollars training "moderate rebels" who were actually aligned with Al Qaeda. Regime change wars in Syria, like in Iraq, Libya, and Egypt, risk the rise of Islamist extremists like Al Qaeda. We now have an Islamist extremist in charge of Syria who celebrated the 9/11 attack and is persecuting religious minorities like Christians. Every American deserves to know if our government supported our enemy, Al Qaeda.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister chairman. Colonel Gabbard, when Russia was denying us use of chemical weapons, they accused The US of supporting terrorists. This is a line that Putin used frequently during the Syrian civil war as he supported Assad. Syrian officials made similar comments. They did it repeatedly. They did it in public. They did it at the United Nations. In 2016, you gave an interview in which you said, and this is a quote, The US is providing direct and indirect support to terrorist groups in order to overthrow the Syrian government. And in 2019, on the Democratic presidential debate stage, you said of president Trump, this is a quote, this current president is continuing to betray us. We were supposed to be going after Al Qaeda, but over years now, not only have we not gone after Al Qaeda, our president is supporting Al Qaeda. So I'm interested to hear what was your goal in saying these things, and did you consider, before saying them, the motives of Iran and Russia, what their motives might have been before making these claims? Speaker 1: Senator, as as someone who enlisted in the military specifically because of Al Qaeda's terrorist attack on nine eleven and committing myself and my life to doing what I could to defeat these terrorists. It was shocking and a betrayal to me and every person who was killed on nine eleven, their families, and my brothers and sisters in uniform. When as a member of congress, I learned about president Obama's dual programs that he had begun, really to overthrow the regime of Syria and being willing to, through the CIA's timber sycamore program that has now been made public, of working with and arming and equipping Al Qaeda in an effort to overthrow that regime, starting yet another regime change war in The Middle East. DOD train and equip program, again, begun under president Obama, is widely been known, looked at, and studied that ultimately resulted in over half a billion dollars being used to train who they called moderate rebels, but were actually fighters working with and aligned with Al Qaeda's affiliate on the ground in Syria, all to move forward with their regime change and not acknowledging what was obvious at the time and what has unfortunately born true, which was that a regime change war in Syria, much like the regime change wars in Iraq, the link of Gaddafi and Mubarak, while these are all dictators, would likely result in the rise of Islamist extremists like Al Qaeda taking power. Shed no tears for the fall of the Assad regime, but today we have an Islamist extremist who is now in charge of Syria, as I said, who danced on the streets to celebrate the nine eleven attack, who ruled over Idlib with an Islamist extremist governance, and who has already begun to persecute and kill and arrest religious minorities like Christians in Syria. I understand. Why that should be acceptable to anyone is beyond me. It should Speaker 0: should And I understand. Thanks, sir. Appreciate I appreciate your answer, and and and thank you. My concern has to do with the the tendency to repeat Russian and Syrian, and even in some cases, I think we'll get into in the closed session, Iranian information and to discount what comes from our intelligence community. Speaker 1: Senator, every American deserves to know that people in our own government were providing support to our sworn enemy, Al Qaeda, that should not be acceptable by anyone. Speaker 0: Thank
Rothbard1776
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 2:50 PM

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

How many people are aware that Japan banned the MMR [Measles, Mumps & Rubella] vaccine all the way back in 1993?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Consider Japan's controversial move to ban the MMR vaccine, standing up to Western pharmaceutical influence. Despite being trashed during COVID for their cautious approach to vaccines, Japan maintains a healthy population. Japan banned the MMR vaccine in 1993 after a four-year experiment led to serious financial and human costs. Out of almost 4,000 medical compensation claims related to vaccines over thirty years, a quarter were from adverse reactions to the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. There were three deaths, and eight children were left with permanent handicaps. The government opted to continue using individual vaccines instead. This ban specifically targets the combined vaccine, the same one that was scrutinized by Andrew Wakefield. Western countries continue to administer this combined vaccine, while Japan has rejected it due to safety concerns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is incredible. I I really want you guys to think about that because it's unbelievable. Now I'll add something else to the mix. Japan. Japan is a country with low mortality rates in children, and it is very controversial that they made the move to ban the MMR vaccine, to stand up to the western big pharma hold, and you will see Japan was absolutely trashed during COVID because they are not a very vax friendly nation. They are very realistic about vaccines. When you poll the Japanese people, they believe that a lot of them cause issues. And so they have become, as a government, almost stigmatized by western governments who are trying to say they're doing everything wrong except their population is quite healthy, and they won't explain that. So this article is entitled why Japan banned the MMR vaccine, and it says, Japan stopped using the MMR vaccine seven years ago, virtually the only developed nation to turn its back on the jab. Government health chiefs claim a four year experiment with it has had serious financial and human costs. Of the 3,969 medical compensation claims relating to vaccines in the last thirty years, a quarter had been made by those badly affected by the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, they say. The triple jab was banned in Japan in 1993 after one point eight million children had been given two types of MMR, and a record number developed a nonviral meningitis and other adverse reactions. Official figures show there were three deaths while eight children were left with permanent handicaps ranging from damaged hearing and blindness to loss of control of limbs. The government reconsidered using MMR in 1999, but decided it was safer to keep the ban and continue using individual vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella. So I wanna be clear. It is the combined vaccine that we are talking about. The combined vaccine is what Andrew Wakefield was talking about, in the paper that he had published in Lancet that Lancet decided to revoke and before before they revoked his license for having audacity to say it. And it is the combined vaccine in which we give in Western countries that Japan said no more. We're seeing way too much of this.

@RealCandaceO - Candace Owens

Alright parents, here it is for free. Our episode regarding the MMR vaccine. It is everything you need to know when the media is fear-mongering. I would NEVER get this combo shot for my children. https://candaceowens.com/video/a-shot-in-the-dark-ep-14-mmr/

A Shot In The Dark Ep 14 | MMR - Candace Owens candaceowens.com

@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll

Hey @RobertKennedyJr, helllll no! What the hell is this? The call to action is 1 in 32 children in America today have autism. Just because Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are burning their reputations to the ground doesn’t mean you should too.

Rothbard1776
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 11:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm working to reverse the troubling policies in California by implementing a proven system for voter registrations and restoring election integrity. If we abandon California, we risk letting its oppressive policies spread nationwide. Please consider donating to support this cause.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Ric Grenell is trying to reverse these insane policies in CA with a proven system to drive voter registrations and reinstate election integrity. If we give up on California, not only will we lose one of the most beautiful states in the country, but their tyrannical policies will continue to spread throughout the rest of the country. Please consider making a donation [in any amount] to help bring common sense back to California. https://fixcalifornia.com/home-mobile/#av-layout-grid-1

FIX CALIFORNIA Election Integrity and Voter Engagement for a Better California. fixcalifornia.com

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This MUST keep being talked about Joe Rogan and Elon Musk both raising awareness of Democrats voter fraud schemes “California made it actually illegal to ask for ID when people vote” “Yes. California and New York. You are not allowed to show your ID when you vote. I just wanna be clear. So everyone understands this. In California, New York, you are not allowed to show your ID even if you want to.” “Man, if you're trying to do, if you're trying to facilitate fraud in elections, it's a great idea. That's the only reason. There's no other reason” “Let's say you wanted to commit fraud. What are the things you would do? You would say you don't need ID and you can mail in your ballot”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In California and New York, showing ID when voting is not allowed, even if you want to. The question is, why would that ever be a good idea? Well, if you're trying to facilitate fraud in elections, it's a great idea. There's logically no other reason why that would be a good idea. It's for fraud. Wake up, people. If you wanted to commit fraud, the first things you would do is say that you don't need an ID and that you can mail in your ballot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California made it actually illegal to ask for ID when people vote. Speaker 1: Yes. California and New York, you are not allowed to show your ID when you vote. I just wanna be clear so everyone understands this. In California, you you are not allowed to show your ID even if you want to. Right. Speaker 0: Why would that ever be a good idea? Speaker 1: I mean What what like, Speaker 0: if you want to steal man it. Speaker 1: If you try to do if if you're trying to facilitate fraud in elections, it's a great idea. Speaker 0: That's the only reason. Yes. There's no other reason logically why that would be a good idea. Speaker 1: It's for fraud. It's it's like it's like wake up, people. Wake up. Hello? Like, let's say you wanted to commit fraud. What are the things you would do? Speaker 0: Yeah. You do You Speaker 1: would say you don't need ID, and you can mail in your ballot.
Rothbard1776
Posted - August 7, 2024 at 2:45 AM
Saved - August 9, 2024 at 1:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Are Kamala Harris and Tim Walz linked to a money-laundering scheme involving counterfeit currency from China, George Floyd, and Derek Chauvin? In January 2020, Customs seized $900,000 in counterfeit bills from China in Minnesota. Four months later, Floyd attempted to use a counterfeit $20 bill, and Chauvin was one of the responding officers. Both had worked at the same club. Walz was governor during these events and has a long history with China, including teaching there and setting up exchange programs. Harris gained attention for raising funds to bail out rioters after Floyd's death.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Are Kamala Harris and Tim Walz connected to an international money-laundering and counterfeit US currency scheme involving Communist China, George Floyd and Derek Chauvin? Let’s explore some highly curious and interesting connections. In January of 2020, US Customs and Border Control seized $900,000 in counterfeit US currency in International Falls, Minnesota from a rail shipment that originated in Communist China. Why were the police originally called on George Floyd just four months after CBP seized nearly $1M in counterfeit bills in MN? Because George Floyd attempted to pass a counterfeit $20 bill in a Minneapolis grocery store. Where did Floyd get the fake $20? As we all know, one of the four officers who arrived on scene for the counterfeit currency call was Derek Chauvin (one veteran and a bunch of rookie cops). Prior to this incident, Floyd and Chauvin worked together at the same sketchy club/restaurant called El Nuevo Rodeo. The owner of the club, Maya Santamaria, said that Chauvin worked security there for 17 years when he was off-duty. She also said that Floyd worked there as a bouncer for several years and both worked on Tuesday nights (reported by CBS). How is it possible that Chauvin and Floyd didn’t cross paths or know each other? This was not a large place. They worked the same nights. Moving on … Who was the Governor when $900,000 in counterfeit bills originating from a rail shipment in Communist China were seized by CBP in Minnesota? Who was the Governor when George Floyd died on the same day he tried to pass the counterfeit $20 and the City of Minneapolis (including the local police precinct where Chauvin worked …) was subsequently allowed to burn to the ground, all of which occurred FOUR MONTHS after the counterfeit bills originating in China were seized by US Customs and Border Patrol? Governor Tim Walz. So what? What does any of that mean? What’s the possible connection? There’s currently an AVALANCHE of reporting calling attention to the extremely curious, troubling and DEEP connections between Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and, you guessed it … Communist China. The formal connections between Tim Walz and China go back for more than 35 years. 1) Tim Walz received a special work visa and was a teacher in Communist China dating back to 1989, around the time of the Tiananmen Square massacre. 2) Tim Walz went to China every year between 1996 and 2003. 3) Tim Walz and his wife spent their honeymoon in China with over 60 Americans in-tow. 4) Tim Walz himself admits that he’s been to China over 30 times (that we know of). 5) Tim Walz and his wife set up an exchange program to take US students on trips to China, a program that was funded by the CCP. 6) Tim Walz reportedly failed a security clearance in 2021 for a job in the Biden administration due to “foreign influence”. No other details were given. 7) Tim Walz claimed he’s been fascinated with China since his childhood because he remembered seeing pictures of Mao Tse-Tung being frequently carried in parades, in … Nebraska? Those are just a few connections currently hitting the news. Kamala Harris has now chosen Tim Walz to be her VP nominee. Who became famous for raising money to bail out violent rioters who caused chaos and destroyed the city of Minneapolis in the wake of the George Floyd riots? Riots that resulted in the local police station being burned to the ground, causing over $1B in total damages. Riots that started after George Floyd died on the same day the police were called after he tried to pass a counterfeit $20 bill … 4 months after US Customs and Border Patrol seized nearly $1M in counterfeit US currency on a rail car in Minnesota that originated in Communist China? Kamala Harris. Kamala was one of California’s two Senators at the time. The other CA Senator? Dianne Feinstein, whose private driver for over 20 years was a spy from …_____? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Rothbard1776
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 7:09 AM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 9:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss various events, including the alleged coup against Trump, the Mueller investigation, the impeachment proceedings, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Biden administration. The author expresses skepticism towards the media, accuses Democrats of election fraud, and criticizes the Biden administration's policies. They suggest that Biden may be replaced before the DNC convention. The tone is critical and conspiratorial.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

The Trump coup and where we are today: The Obama administration illegally spied on the Republican presidential nominee during the 2016 election based on lies peddled and paid for by Hillary Clinton, a career criminal. The media dutifully played their part to flood the airwaves with accusations Trump was a Russian agent. After Trump’s surprise election victory, the Obama administration immediately initiated plans to cover their tracks, protect themselves from prosecution, and destroy the incoming Trump admin in any way possible. One of the first steps in that plan was to set up Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor, @GenFlynn, who was fired by Obama for the sin of recognizing Barack’s widespread foreign policy and intelligence failures. Flynn was framed. Biden himself recommended using the Logan Act to go after him, a law that’s never been used to prosecute anyone in the history of the United States. Shortly after Trump rightfully fired Obama’s corrupt and incompetent FBI Director, James Comey, the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller to “oversee” the completely made up, fake and phony FBI investigation into the alleged “Russia collusion”, which they knew was a lie from day one. This was less than 5 months into the Trump presidency. The primary purpose of the Mueller probe was to protect the FBI, CIA, DOJ, NSA, corporate media, accomplices in both parties and every other key player in the attempted coup and spy operation from having their crimes exposed by now being able to use the justification that any attempt to look into the crimes related to Spygate would “compromise an ongoing investigation”. We soon discover the entire Mueller team is composed of Anti-Trump sycophants. Peter “we’ll stop him” Strzok. Lisa Page. Andrew Weissmann. And the list goes on. We also learn FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith intentionally altered an email to make it look like Carter Page, a Trump advisor, was a Russian asset by covering up the fact that Page was previously used as an intelligence asset for the United States, providing valuable intel to the government. When the Mueller case was finally wrapped up after 2.5 years, wasting $50 million, conducting hundreds of interviews, using dozens of investigators … they finally admitted the truth: There was no evidence of Russian collusion by President Trump or anyone associated with his campaign. After coming up empty handed, Weissmann and Co. still needed to try and paint Trump in a bad light, so they lay out a bogus case for “obstruction of justice” because Trump committed the horrific crime of … defending himself from false allegations. Every member of the Mueller team then deleted all of the data from their government issued iPhones and devices by “accidentally” entering their passwords incorrectly 10+ times in a row. The destruction of their communications is a felony. No one was charged. Does this sound like someone else you know who BleachBit her devices and smashed them with a hammer? Less than on month later on April 21st, Trump called newly elected Ukrainian President Zelensky to congratulate him on his victory. On April 25th, four days later, Biden announces his candidacy for President and Hunter steps down from the Board of Burisma. On July 24th, 2019 Robert Mueller testified before Congress on the results of “his” investigation. The very next day, Trump has a call with recently elected Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. On that call, Trump expresses hope that Zelenskyy will investigate the alleged corruption in his country. Burisma, as well as Crowdstrike, who allegedly had “proof” the DNC was “hacked by Russia”, are mentioned. Both set off 5-alarm fire bells in DC. Burisma would Biden family corruption. The second would expose the grand lie that the DNC was hacked by Russia. PS - Who was Seth Rich and why did Donna Brazile “fear for her life” after he was killed in a “botched robbery”?

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

After that second call with Zelenskyy, the DC establishment immediately set in motion plans for an eventual impeachment. Less than 30 days later, first major step toward that end was an “anonymous whistleblower complaint” being filed in August, 2019. We later discover the anonymous “whistleblower” was Eric Ciaramella, who had coordinated with Adam Schiff’s staff before filing the complaint. Democrats then initiated an endless parade of public hearings from career bureaucrats and Deep State partisan hacks who all hated Trump. Remember Alexander Vindman? Fiona Hill? Democrats falsely claim Trump threatened to withhold military aid if Ukraine didn’t investigate the Biden family. Trump had actually provided lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine that Obama had refused to, which US officials were forced to admit under questioning by Republicans. Not quite the actions of a Russian agent. Nevertheless, on December 18, 2019, after months of public hearings on Ukraine, along with impeachment inquiries in Congress to set the stage for their next attempt to sabotage Trump, House Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi introduced the first articles of impeachment against DJT. Bear in mind, The Trump administration had immediately released a transcript of the Zelenskyy call in question because there was nothing to hide. Democrats accused Trump of obstructing justice by defending himself against the ludicrous Russian collusion scam investigation, and “abusing his power” by asking Zelenskyy to investigate the (obvious) corruption in his country. As we all know, the Biden family was involved in well-documented influence peddling from Joe’s position in Washington. Remember, Biden was overseeing Ukrainian policy while serving as VP. Hunter was making $83,333 a month serving on the board of Burisma alone. Hunter’s business partners, Tony Bobulinski, verified the accuracy of the emails from the Biden laptop, which the public now knows are 100% real and accurate. The FBI had the laptop the whole time (starting in at least September ‘19) and covered it up. Biden is on tape threatening to withhold $1B in loan guarantees unless Ukraine fired the prosecutor who was looking into Burisma’s corruption, threads that may ultimately implicate Hunter, the Biden family and several US political leaders and their families (Romney, Pelosi, McCain, Graham, etc.) involved in various Ukrainian kickbacks and shady dealings. Why wouldn’t the American people want this to be investigated? The first impeachment was finally put up for a vote on February 5th, 2020. It was narrowly defeated, 52-48. While the impeachment sideshow was occurring to further handicap and damage Trump’s administration for the millionth time, the seeds were being sown for the next stage of the coup operation, the COVID-19 pandemic. Remember, impeachment articles were brought on December 18th, 2019 after being held by Democrats for weeks. On December 12th, people in Wuhan reportedly began to have flu like symptoms. On New Year’s Eve, the [corrupt] WHO office in China are informed about a pneumonia like illness spreading in Wuhan, connected to the “wet market”. New Year’s Day, Wuhan market is closed. On January 7th, 2020, China determines that a novel coronavirus is responsible for the outbreak. The historic Phase-One China trade deal was signed and became enforceable on January 15th, 2020. Interesting timing … Eight days later on January 23rd, China places the entire city of Wuhan under lockdown. January 24th, one travel-related case is identified in Illinois, bringing the total US “cases” to two. Remember, we know now the “cases” and entire pandemic was a carefully constructed and well organized fraud compared to how it was presented. The videos of people dropping dead in the streets, the “overwhelmed” hospitals, the fraudulent PCR tests, the made up “social distancing” guidelines, the bat soup. All of it.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

I’d be remiss if I didn’t also mention Event 201 hosted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and World Economic Forum back in October, 2019, predicting a COVID pandemic. Must’ve been a lucky guess. Fast forward to March 13th, barely a month after the impeachment trial is over: the Trump administration declares a national emergency. On March 15th, states begin to lockdown. Panic ensues. Toilet paper shortage. COVID case and death count tallies are displayed on newly every TV station for months. You know the rest. Fast forward to the summer of 2020 and the George Floyd riots. The CDC comes out and says social justice is so important that the “deadly pandemic” restrictions don’t apply to any of the protestors or all 5 of George Floyd’s golden casket funerals. Apparently regular laws didn’t apply to tether as our cities burned and innocent people were murdered (RIP David Dorn), at the same time your businesses were locked down, you missed cancer screenings and doctors appointments, surgeries were cancelled or postponed, schools were closed, gyms were closed and people were being arrested for walking on the beach by themselves or playing on the playground at the local park. Without rehashing the entire pandemic, I’ll focus in on a few key points: The economy was destroyed. The completely made-up justification for universal mail-in ballots is implemented. Swing states like PA begin to illegally change their election laws without a vote by their respective state legislatures in the weeks and months leading up to the November presidential election. Meanwhile a news story breaks about the Biden laptop from hell. 51 intel officers sign a document stating that it has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation operation. We know the laptop was 100% real. Clear election interference. Election night: Trump is dominating Biden. He wins key battleground states of Florida, Ohio + Iowa, along with all of the traditional Republican strongholds. He has big leads in each of the remaining (6) swing states. All of a sudden, out of nowhere and for the first time in history, they stop the counts in each of these states. As a side note: on the day of the election, the CDC released a memo saying that even if you had an active COVID infection, you could still vote in person, which completely eviscerated the case for mail-in ballots, which were already mailed out in the tens of millions all over the country. In Fulton County, GA, the media breaks a story claiming that a pipe break caused a flood in State Farm Arena where votes were being cast and counted. We later found out it was leaky toilet. Republican poll watchers and media figures are sent home for the night after being told counting would be paused for the evening and resume in the AM. When Republican poll watchers and media figures leave, Democrats stay behind to count ballots in secret, unsupervised, for at least two hours. Camera footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, ballots being pulled from underneath tables and more. Media runs cover. In unrelated news, Fulton County is currently in court requesting that ALL BALLOTS from 2020 be destroyed. Brian Kemp, GA Governor, also just revealed that he didn’t vote for Trump in 2020. Same guy who refused to investigate election fraud. Shocker. In any event, I could do the same for each state, but if you’ve made it this far, I shouldn’t have to belabor the obvious. After the initial vote counts were stopped, several states went on to see their results flip overnight at 4 am, and Trump’s lead continued to be chipped away as more mail-in ballots were miraculously discovered. As the days dragged on, the coup was complete. The regime had installed their puppet and successfully torpedoed the Presidency of Donald Trump, while every single one of them managed to escape accountability for the Russia Hoax, spying on Trump’s campaign, COVID, Ukrainian corruption, election fraud, election interference and a host of other crimes.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Shortly after Biden is declared the winner, President Trump is kicked off social media platforms across the internet (Twitter, Facebook, IG, YouTube) while he was still the Commander-In-Chief. It’s still mind-boggling to think about. I can’t believe they had the balls to do it. After officially taking office, the Biden administration quickly went to work destroying the United States, which they’ve been accomplishing with frightening speed. Inflation at 40-year highs. A housing crisis. Runaway deficits. Illegal immigration at all time highs. A disastrous foreign policy that includes the horrendously executed Afghan withdrawal; assassinating a family of 10 (7 of whom were children) via drone strike, supporting the slaughter of both Russians and Ukrainians by sabotaging a peace deal and giving $200B to Ukraine; committing a terrorist act by blowing up the Nordstream pipeline; the illegal seizure of $300B in Russian assets by Janet Yellen which will destroy any remaining faith in the US government on the international stage, undermining trust in the USD as the world’s reserve currency; the disasters in Israel and Gaza; and pushing the BRICS partnership, along with a growing coalitions of nations to abandon the US dollar. As if those failures weren’t enough: the Biden administration fought to extend COVID lockdowns, mandated COVID vaccines for the military, healthcare personnel and others, expanded internet censorship of opposing viewpoints and colluded with Big Tech companies to silence their critics, labeled parents at school-board meetings domestic terrorists for questioning pornographic books displayed in elementary school libraries, and locked up hundreds (or thousands) of non-violent protestors on J6. With too many failures to list and a President who’s been suffering from obvious cognitive decline throughout his entire Presidency, the media has dutifully defended him at every turn. They’ve said he’s as mentally sharp as he’s been, has more stamina than anyone else they’ve ever seen, and works 12 hour days without breaking a sweat. Meanwhile he can barely string two sentences together in public, turns into a Roomba when it’s time to find his way off stage, pooped his pants at the Vatican, has fallen on numerous occasions, crashed his bicycle, still thinks he’s in the Senate, campaigned from his basement back in 2020 and almost never gives interviews to the press. No matter how much our eyes and ears show the opposite, the media has consistently defended his “fitness” for office. While the corporate media apparatus has been defending their puppet, the DNC has been carefully executing their plan to replace Joe Biden at or just before the upcoming DNC convention. Thursday night’s debate was the first public step towards that goal. Uniparty media members and Democrat internet commentators began to astroturf the airwaves pointing out Biden’s cognitive decline as if it was some new revelation. There’s a reason why the June 24th debate was chosen. The DNC convention is scheduled for August 19th-22nd. Tonight’s carefully managed train-wreck lays the ground work for the complicit media and DNC operatives to begin planting the necessary narratives to facilitate the eventual removal and replacement of Joe Biden, a political liability. The only question now is, who does the establishment replace him with? As the great @TheLastRefuge2 has echoed for many, many years, “There are trillions of dollars at stake”. Trump surprised them in 2016. They won’t leave anything to chance again. There are no coincidences. Every action is carefully planned with the sole intent of gaining power and holding onto it with an iron fist. Tonight was the first arrow in Joe’s back. To any unbiased and moderately observant person, the media’s sudden flip flop is yet more undeniable proof that they’re all paid propagandists who deserve no respect and no trust, only ridicule. The election is 129 days away. Buckle up and prepare for fireworks.

Rothbard1776
Posted - November 25, 2020 at 10:52 PM
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 1:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, now Director of the Amistad Project, reveals the impact of $350M from Mark Zuckerberg on the election. They have filed suits in multiple states, highlighting questionable or fraudulent ballots. In swing states alone, hundreds of thousands of ballots are in question, including 150k in Wisconsin. Over 12k Republicans' votes were not counted. Zuckerberg's funds facilitated the creation of drop-boxes and counting centers, influencing the election process. Evidence shows how they instructed local officials in Democrat areas. A suit has been filed in Georgia, involving 200k ballots.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Phill Kline, former Kansas Attorney General & current Director of the Amistad Project: “We already have suits in 6 states, but we’re filing more based on this new data. A series of decisions at the local level, funded & encouraged by the flow of $350M of Mark Zuckerburg

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

2. monies that allowed for the infusion of these questionable or fraudulent ballots into the stream to be counted. The analysis, using gov’t data and then calling out to voters, asking them about their behavior and getting them to sign affidavits, is that in EACH ONE

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

3. of these swings states, there are 100’s of thousands of ballots in question. In addition to the ballots in WI [up to 150k improperly filed/counted] we’ve identified over 12,000 Republicans who voted, whose votes were not counted according to the state’s data. So what you had

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

4. was $350M coming in, the creation of all this drop-box, consolidated counting centers in the urban core around the nation, Zuckerburg money paying the election judges & officials inside the rooms, and then Republicans in America kicked out of the counting room. That cannot

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

5. stand & should not stand as a fair and integral election ... Mark Zuckerburg’s monies alone matched the federal gov’t appropriations for elections this year. $400M. Google also gave money to this effort. We now have evidence pursuant to court order ... that they actually told

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

6. local election officials how to manage the election in these core Democrat areas where you see all the problems. That was Zuckerburg and a group called “The Center for Tech & Civic Life”. I give you this thought: They told America we need to consolidate counting centers, for

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

7. COVID! We’re going to create a crowd, to protect us ... from COVID! That makes no sense. The reason they did it, is because they didn’t want Republicans to see, and they wanted to infuse fraudulent ballots ... and they did it.” 💥 Suit filed in GA today. 200k ballots. 🇺🇸

Rothbard1776
Posted - December 30, 2020 at 8:06 PM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 1:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Expert witnesses presented irrefutable evidence at the GA hearing, revealing that votes were removed or flipped from Trump to Biden on election night. The data used that night showed discrepancies. The GaSecofState website states Trump lost by 12,670 votes, but more were taken from him. The data, certified by GaSecofState's office, also shows negative decrements, corroborated by NYT and networks. Brave whistleblowers shed light on this massive fraud. Thanks to RSBNetwork for continuous coverage.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Irrefutable [?] evidence presented by expert witnesses from the GA hearing showing that [based on the data that was provided and used on election night] votes were removed and/or flipped from Trump to Biden. You NEED to watch and share this entire presentation. https://t.co/SD80lO6ImK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video highlights instances of vote manipulation in the election database, specifically focusing on Donald Trump's votes. It reveals that votes for Trump were switched and removed from his total, making it appear as if there were no changes. In three counties, over 30,000 votes for Trump disappeared. The video provides a clear example of this manipulation, where Trump's votes were switched with Biden's in a matter of minutes. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting due to the time lag between each state update.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've just seen a few examples of statistical irregularities and impossibilities. Now let's take a closer look at some vote manipulation within the election database including explicit vote count switching from 1 candidate to another. We can see in Dodge County, there's A lot of strange activity going on. The left side of the screen shows incremental votes as they were recorded for both election day and absentee. On the right, we can see the total vote counts which should only be incremental moving as the county reported in real time. Again, here we're focusing only on Donald Trump's votes. So this wouldn't necessarily be captured at the state totals as they reported on TV. Since 1 county's deduction in votes can be offset by another county's reporting of equal or greater votes. The first question you're going to want to ask or already have asked is, why or any VARs going negative. And the answer is they shouldn't. Unbeknownst to the general public, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, which often coincided with other precinct updates, but simultaneously offset deductions so that they appear to remain neutral to outside observers. Across the 3 counties of Dodge, Daughtry and Putnam, Trump has over 30,000 votes that simply disappear. Here, we have clear visibility of an event that occurred at the county level as we compare 2 data sources. In this case, Donald Trump reported 29,391 votes at 9:11 local time in Bibb County, Georgia. Simultaneously, Joe Biden was reported to have of 17,218 votes. Minutes later, the next reported time update in the precinct data sources, Donald Trump is reported to have 17,000 218 votes and Biden now has 29,391 votes. A clear and exact switch of vote totals between candidates. Because there is a time lag between each state reported aggregation of county results, this type of switch and go undetected in state reporting as long as it falls after the latest state refresh and before the next state update.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

2/ VIDEO [Part Two] “According to the @GaSecofState website, Trump lost by 12,670 votes. As you saw earlier in this video, far more than that were taken from @realDonaldTrump”. https://t.co/soPyIf3jTt

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the Georgia Secretary of State website, Trump lost by 12,670 votes. An anomaly detection algorithm called isolation force can identify outliers in election data. The burden of proof lies with the system to prove the fairness of elections. In Georgia, after checking in at a poll pad, voters use ImageCAST precinct terminals to cast their votes. The ballot images are then transported to a warehouse and run through tabulation software called Democracy Suite. The totals are exported to a Dominion server and transmitted to the election night reporting server, which sends the data to the secretary of state and data aggregators. The process includes options for updating, rejecting, and generating temporary batches of data.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to the Georgia Secretary of State website, Trump lost by 12,670 folks. As you saw earlier in this video, far more than that were taken from president Trump. In statistics, an anomaly or outlier is an observation or event that deviates so much from other events that are arousing suspicions in its generation. In this, an isolation force is defined as a specialized learning algorithm for anomaly detection that works to the principle of isolating these outliers and flagging them for potential review. Remember these graphs when you meet your government officials in person. The burden of proof is on the system to prove our elections were fair and not the people. Okay. Speaker 1: So here's how your voters count in Georgia using Fulton County's process as an example. So after you check-in at a poll pad to vote on election day, you go to an ImageCAST precinct terminal. After you cast your vote, a ballot image is taped on the machine. And after all the polls closed, the SD cards containing all the BAW images are removed from the terminals and transported by car to, in Polk County, one of 4 drop off locations. Then it's transferred by police escort to the 1365 English Street warehouse. Inside of there, it is run through a tabulation software called Democracy Suite, which counts the balance and exports the totals to a Dominion server that inserts those totals into a SQL Server database. From that point, it's directly transmitted to the SIDAL election night reporting server. The election night reporting server is responsible for transmitting the totals to the secretary of state or output to their website and data aggregators like Edison we then transmit that data to the networks. Speaker 2: As you just saw, there is a standard process for transferring boats by memory card from precinct to county boat aggregators. Now let's focus specifically on this square box detailing the data entry process for county updates. The following options are available to anyone with access to these computers working in the election software. Updating load batches, rejecting load batches, and even more notable, generating new more temporary batches that can be injected directly into the

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

3/ VIDEO [Part Three] “Because you’re not having people enter these totals into a spreadsheet, that removes the entire layer, the entire argument for any kind of human entry error, because there is no human being entering anything anywhere in here.” https://t.co/R9YtZRdvSG

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses concerns about the potential manipulation of votes in election software. It questions whether proper validation processes were followed, such as having observers from both parties present during the transmission of SD cards and the transportation of ballots. The speaker also mentions the use of election night reporting data and emphasizes that there is no human entry of totals, which eliminates the possibility of human error.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Each of these options can then be validated and published into the system. Again, anyone working in election software at this point has the power to manipulate large batches of votes. And all of this is before the data is even uploaded to the server. Speaker 1: What should have happened during the validation process? Were there 2 observers from both parties present for the transmission of the SD card, were there 2 observers from both parties present in the car when the boats were taken to the drop off locations? Is there a public log of these exchanges at the various drop off points and locations? Why are elected officials not asking these questions about our most sacred right to vote? Speaker 2: Okay. So real quick, I just wanna jump in there. And, if you can go back to that The chart I wanna reference 2 things on the side there. I'm sorry. The, diagram. Okay. So in this diagram here, as I was telling you earlier, we use the CIDL source, that election night reporting source. We have their data for all of Georgia. Also, we have The data that comes from New York Times or the see, the New York Times Edison part on the right side there. Right? And for all intents and purposes, that election night reporting is going from there directly to the secretary of state. Right? This is the same data. It's the exact same data. Now the thing is is that in every single aspect of this chart from pull you know, the pull pad, which doesn't really affect the thing to The the ballot marking device, more importantly, these these actual ballot marking devices on the precincts, when they go to when they're when they are tabulated at the end of the pulling period and the kind of these SD cards are removed or sort of the compact flash drives are removed. They're transmitted by person to these drop off points tabulated and so on and so forth. This whole process is a human sorry. ADM. Machine to machine to machine transfer for all intents and purposes using humans as a medium, but at the same time, you're not having people enter, for instance, into a spreadsheet these totals. Because you're not having people enter these totals into a spreadsheet, that removes the entire layer and the entire argument for any kind of human entry error Because there's no human being entering anything anywhere in here. You can't show me a place where a human being enters stuff in here.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

4/ VIDEO [Four] “Our data that’s showing these negative drops is coming from a machine > machine > machine source. There is no reason that at ANY POINT something should be subtracted. I want to make that very clear. At no point during an incremental process should you decrement.” https://t.co/2SeQHa3WSD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the possibility of fraud in the data analysis of negative vote counts. They emphasize that the data comes from machine sources and there should be no reason for votes to be subtracted. They mention the RTR software options and highlight the lack of overarching controls and flexibility in the system. They explain that votes should follow a specific sequence and any alterations should only occur in extreme situations. The existence of a vulnerability in the system is identified. They stress that machines should not decrement votes unless explicitly programmed to do so, comparing it to depositing money in a bank account. Any removal of votes should be properly explained.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now if there were a human being entering the it's something in there, then that would point to a type of fraud or fraud aspect of this this this whole thing. So the point is is that our data that's showing these negative drops is coming from a machine to machine to machine source. There's no reason that at any point something should be subtracted. And I wanna make that very, very clear that at no point in an incremental process should you decrement. Are there any questions? Speaker 1: To add to that too, I wanted to highlight just very quickly, I know we were we were short on time, but we've we've mentioned the RTR software options in the the video. And what's important here is that this is built into the software itself so that, you know, when anyone logs into their Windows or Apple machines, you have a certain set of maybe you have parental controls on there for children. But in this particular case, there's no overarching controls in this type of flexibility of options you see here on that 1 through 4 is available. So there's a situation where new batches can be created. You can reject, which is outside of this typical chain of sequence within this network diagram where votes should go in at the polling locations. Should be counted at the absentee counting locations and through SD cards and only in extreme situations if there was an adjudication are those process is meant should they be altered. And the fact that this exists anywhere within this sort of sequential supply is a vulnerability in the overall system. So this is here to identify that that vulnerability exists and also to reinforce the fact that what we had seen in our data analysis of votes going negative should be outside of that process and also should not exist because we are thinking about a machine Dean talking to machine talking to machine. And a machine, unless it's explicitly programmed to decrement, should not decrement, especially voting situation, similar as the way you deposit money into a bank account we mentioned earlier, votes no different, you only are adding here. And if there's a removal, there needs to be a very good explanation as to why.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

5/ VIDEO [Part Five] “Please understand, the data your @GaSecofState’s office is certifying w/, is the same data that shows these negative decrements [votes being siphoned from Trump] is the same data the NYT is reporting, the networks are reporting.” This is simply stunning. https://t.co/xXcVV3kSa1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the data does not align with normal legal voting processes and lacks consistency. They mention that the certified data, which is also reported by the New York Times and networks, shows negative errors and fraudulent votes. They suggest that either the secretary of state's office is certifying flawed results or someone is providing them with incorrect information. They emphasize that the certified votes for Georgia contain negative swings and decrements, which are errors and do not accurately represent the state's voters. No blame is assigned, but the focus is on highlighting the discrepancies in the certification process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Provided and simply nor is it consistent with how the data is structured and what we've seen in our analysis as to any part of the process that would be consistent with normal routine legal voting. Are there any questions? Speaker 1: Can I make one brief Mr? Chairman, one brief note? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: This is a point of reference In layman's terms, please understand that the data that your secretary of state's office is certifying with is the same data that shows these negative decrements. Is the same data that they are receiving is what the New York Times is reporting is what the networks are reporting. So either the secretary of state's office is recording and certifying results that have negative errors and fraudulent votes in them or someone is giving them negative information. We're not here to point fingers. We're just here to tell you that the certification of votes and the votes that were submitted for the state of Georgia have negative swings in them and have decrements in them. And these are errors, And they are not representative for the state of Georgia and how the state of Georgia's voters voted.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

6/ Thank you to each of these brave whistleblowers, experts and patriotic Americans for shining a light on this massive fraud, as well as @RSBNetwork for the incredible non-stop coverage. 🙏🏼🇺🇸☀️

View Full Interactive Feed