TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Ryanmatta

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 12:48 AM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Tel Aviv was just hit, Saudi Arabia oil facility were struck, and an Iranian missile hit Dubai’s airport. https://t.co/s4fmNx06yj

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Trump is the biggest disappointment in presidential history. I don’t think Trump is going to finish this term out. https://t.co/2RBusI8BfD

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Iran has struck Tel Aviv! https://t.co/juVH0Kools

Saved - February 28, 2026 at 3:25 AM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you think I am crazy? https://t.co/3U6y4nkg79

Saved - February 22, 2026 at 1:08 PM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you remember when Benjamin Netanyahu said this? https://t.co/ZZOjw3IKmX

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Rest in peace Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/FgYR3qLSY6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video presents a sweeping conspiratorial narrative about a globalist plot to destabilize the United States, centered on Jewish-Israeli influence. The speaker apologizes to newcomers for exposing uncomfortable truth and promises to reveal a step-by-step playbook used to undermine America without bullets, culminating in the claim that Charlie Kirk had to be killed. Key claims and themes include: - A 1990 Netanyahu quote is presented as evidence that America is destined to be destabilized and exploited as a “golden calf,” transformed into a large welfare state under control of others. The speaker asserts this explains why “they” destabilize the U.S. and destroy nations slowly. - JFK is portrayed as the first prominent opponent of Israel, with claims that he hated Jews and opposed Israel, while simultaneously being briefed on Israeli actions. The video argues JFK’s assassination was tied to preventing subversion of the U.S. education system, referencing the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act that allegedly allowed Israel to infiltrate U.S. education. - Charlie Kirk is depicted as someone who “poisoned the minds of the youth” and posed a threat to the supposed Jewish-dominated destabilization plan. A segment suggests Kirk’s influence on Christian conversions among Jews upset “the Rabbis” who control Mossad and political circles. - A rabbi’s comments are quoted to claim that Christians are more dangerous than other societal groups because they threaten the Jewish order, framing Christianity as idol worship that endangers Jews. - A KGB/Marxist playbook is invoked (via a named agent, Jory Bensmanov) to outline the four-phase destabilization model: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization, followed by a new foreign-backed authority and the dismantling of constitutional norms. The eight-front war concept is presented, with disinformation as a critical modern battleground. - The video cites a Cuban/foreign intelligence asset describing five warfare principles: changing minds of the young is easier than changing old minds; create instability by division; normalize the abnormal; and portray law and order as fascism to topple democracy. These ideas are linked to contemporary U.S. debates on DEI, CRT, open borders, and perceived Jewish influence in policy and media. - DEI, CRT, LGBTQ agendas, and open borders are framed as tools to divide Americans and destabilize society, with ongoing insinuations about “God’s chosen people” manipulating policy and education to advance their aims. - The closing segments claim America cannot be saved unless people wake up, call out accountability and transparency, and reject a political system controlled by these forces. The speaker ends with a hostile, anti-Jewish sentiment, alleging that the political and social upheaval serves a Jewish-driven agenda. Throughout, the speaker ties Charlie Kirk’s activism and public influence to a broader alleged plan by Israelis and Jews to depose American institutions, collapse the constitutional order, and install new authorities. The overall message asserts that the destabilization of the United States is deliberate, orchestrated by Jewish-Israeli interests, and that traditional social changes (education infiltration, DEI/CRT, open borders) are instrumental steps in that plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanted to start off this video by apologizing to the people that are just finding my content for the very first time because if you haven't gone down the rabbit holes that we've gone down over the last couple weeks and some of these deep dives, some of this is gonna be very hard and it's gonna upset you because it's so truthful and so obvious and it's been right in front of our face. But we've been programmed with decades and decades all the way back to the nineteen fifties or earlier. There is a small group of individuals that are hell bent on destroying America. And in this video, I'm gonna lay out step by step their playbook, and it's gonna paint a big picture. And by the end of this video, I'm gonna show you exactly why they had to kill Charlie Kirk. So if you allow me ten to fifteen minutes of your time, buckle up. We're gonna kick things off with a quote from Netanyahu. This is word for word, verbatim, from the Jerusalem Post by Benjamin Netanyahu in 1990. If we get caught, they will just replace us with a person from the same cloth. So it doesn't matter what you do. America is a golden calf, and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we create and control. Why? Because it's god's will, and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what we do to the countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly, but we make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves. So the man that they've convinced us is supposed to be our greatest ally. In 1990, he was quoted saying that he plans to destabilize America and then in the process, turn us into a forever welfare state, which they control, and we will be their slaves because that's what he does and that's what Israelis do and Jews do to the countries that they hate, and they wanna make them their slaves. So when I tell you that, it's gonna set the groundwork for this video because it's all about how do they destabilize us. How do they take down America without firing single bullet? But before I add that context and we get into this speech from Yori, which is probably one of the best explanations on how you destabilize a nation, I just wanna show you a little history lesson real quick. So Adolf Hitler comes to power in 1933. Five years later, Time Magazine makes Adolf Hitler the man of the year. Kinda let that out of the history books. But I wanna start off with who was the first person to really vocally oppose and stand up to Israel? And who was that man? It was JFK. Speaker 1: Kennedy was gonna end Israel. I don't care what anybody says. I don't he was not a friend to Israel. No. He was he wasn't He was not. He outright hated Jews. Like, straight up. If you wanna talk call him an anti Semite He praised Speaker 0: his old writings. Speaker 1: Right. Right. But there was no friendship to Israel at all. He knew that they were liars. He said all they ever do is lie. And from the day he got into office, when you find the documents pertaining to Newmec and all that stuff, he was getting daily updates on the Israelis, weekly meetings on what they were doing. Speaker 0: So the one key piece I think everybody's missing about why JFK was assassinated and why Israel wanted to kill him so bad. Because in order to subvert our nation, you have to poison the minds of the youth. And what was JFK preventing them from doing? Taking over our education system. Because in 1965, just one year after JFK died, one of the first things that Johnson did is he passed the elementary and secondary education act, the ESA, which allowed Israel and God's chosen people to pretty much infiltrate and take over our education system. Now you might not believe me, but what did Charlie Kirk have more than anything and anybody else in our country? He had the hearts and minds of the masses. And what's more dangerous to the Israelites than somebody that's poisoning the minds of the youth, especially their youth. Check this out. Speaker 2: If you have an American goy, goyogoya. If they are religious in Christianity, they are more wicked than someone that is secular. It's very interesting. Someone who follow a man made book and admire JC and follow the New Testament claiming is the book of God is actually a bigger criminal than someone that lives like an animal. Speaker 0: And the full video is about two minutes, so I'm just gonna kinda give you the highlights. Right? That is a rabbi, one of the most powerful leaders within the Jewish community. And he is telling you right there that somebody that worships Jesus Christ and preaches Christianity is more dangerous to then basically a drug addict, a homeless person, a violent criminal. Because the drug addict, violent criminal, they're not trying to, I guess, push their views or their religion upon anybody else. And they might attempt to do that to somebody who's Jewish. And then if somebody in the Jewish faith leaves their faith to go and worship Christ Jesus Christ, that is the ultimate sin to these people. There is no coming back from that, and you couldn't be more dangerous of an individual if you had the power to corrupt the minds of the Jewish youth. Speaker 3: How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this? Raise your hand. Okay. Speaker 4: I think Ted Cruz used Genesis twelve three. I think a lot people see that as off putting when you look at the New Testament. Why? Because I think a lot of people, they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how that the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's. Everyone's included. You're about Romans nine Yes. Nine and six. You Catholic? Converting a Catholic from Judaism. This is my next Speaker 3: slide. Oh, from Judaism? Yes. Oh, wow. So so you're Jew you're ethnically Jewish. Speaker 4: Ethnically Jewish. Speaker 3: Yes. And you have concerns about APAC. Yes. I do. I'm told that by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize APAC, I'm anti Semitic. Speaker 4: I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country. Speaker 0: Now did you see Charlie Kirk's eyes light up with that smile, bright eyed, wait. You're converting from Judaism to Christianity? That's what Charlie Kirk was chasing, and I think that's what really terrified these people. Not just that, you have to poison the minds of the children, But you're probably still thinking, Ryan, the Jews love Charlie. Well, did the really powerful rabbis, the one calling the shots, the one that control Mossad, the one that control the assassination and the hit squads, the ones that buy off our politicians and our government, do you think they really love Charlie Kirk and what he was doing? Speaker 2: One way or the other, this Charlie Kirk, even though he was good to the Jews, good to Israel, good he had good values. He was a preacher of Christianity, a missionary. He affected the life of millions of people to be faithful Christians, which is a cult of idol worshippers. Well, as long as the Goyim follow this, that's their problem. The problem is that he had a lot of Jewish fans. And a lot of these Jewish fans are either stupid or ignorant. So it's very easy to manipulate them. When they see someone speak highly about the Jews or highly about Israel, immediately this person becomes their guru. Let's follow him. He's so talented. He's brilliant. He's great. He's anti Hamas. He's anti this. So every Jew has some values or look for some values. And he's on social media who is gonna become his rabbi, Charlie Kirk. And while he turns him into a person who follows more values and religion, which religion he's gonna make him follow an idol worshipper's religion? Christianity. Speaker 0: So according to the Jewish religion, if you are an idol worshipper, if you worship a false god, you are going to hell, and your punishment will be you will be boiling in a cauldron of human feces and excrement for all of eternity. So mother Mary, because she worshiped a false idol and gave birth to Jesus Christ, who was also a false idol, they are both their punishment. Our God, our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ, and his mother are boiling in cauldrons of human feces and excrement and semen. That's where they these people think our lord and savior is. Now I wish more than anything that we didn't have our goldfish attention brains, and I could keep you here for an hour because this fifteen minute speech would blow your mind, and I'm gonna leave it linked down below in the comments. This is Jory Bensmanov. He's a KGB agent that came over from Russia during the Soviet Union times. He was working for the Marxist Jews over there in Russia that led to the, you know, persecution and slaughtering of 60,000,000 Christians. He came over and gave their whole playbook how to basically destabilize a nation. And what we're what's happening right here in America is they're flipping this. They're claiming it's Muslims that are in infiltrating our institutions. They're claiming it's the Muslims who are pushing their ideology, but, really, it's the Jews. And they've subverted us and pitted us against each other. So, you know, they always say it. Right? They're going to accuse you of what they're doing themselves. We're gonna unpack this. But I wanna let just a two minute clip of this play to kinda give you the highlights and the four phases of destabilizing a nation. Demoralization. Have we been demoralized? Oh, yeah. Destabilization. Have we been destabilized? Then comes the crisis, which I think is, you know, basically a collapse slash civil war slash invasion. Your invasion was massive. Right? We couldn't have handled that for another couple years. It would have brought our country to the knees. Then after you bring the country to its knees, you send in the new authorities. You bring in a foreign military IDF soldiers to put us all in check, martial law, and then you have new authoritarian rule, and you discard old activities. Old activities meaning our constitution. Sound like it's something that's gonna happen? Watch this video and we're gonna keep going after this. So just hang tight. Speaker 5: The first stage of subversion is the process which is called basically demoralization. What it includes? It includes influencing or by various methods, infiltration, propaganda methods of various areas where public opinion is formulated. Speaker 6: So what Israel is fighting here is not merely a seven front war, but an eight front war. For the Jews against Rome. For the Jews against Rome. Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values with a great tragedy for the Jewish people. Well, we lost that one. We have to win the next one. But the new Rome, The United States, Speaker 7: Jews against Rome. Stopped playing defense and have moved offense. Speaker 8: The the weapons change over time. You can't fight today with the swords that doesn't work very well. Speaker 7: But we need the kind of genius that manufactured Apollo gold pagers and infiltrated Hezbollah for over a decade to prepare for this battle. Speaker 8: We have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are social media. Speaker 7: Because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline. Speaker 6: This is the eighth front, the disinformation campaign. Speaker 4: It is actually this eighth front where enemies believe they can actually defeat the Jewish state. Speaker 5: The next step is destabilization. Again, this word says for itself what it is. To destabilize all the relations, all the accepted institutions and organizations in a country of your enemy. How you do it? You don't have to send up a battalion of KGB agents to blow up bridges. No. You let them do it themselves. And there are violent clashes between him and police, his group and and ordinary people no matter what. It's black against white, yellows against green, doesn't matter where is the vision line goes. As long as this group come into antagonistic clash, that is destabilization. Destabilization process usually leads directly to the process of crisis. Crisis is when society cannot function anymore productively. It collapses. So therefore, the population at large is looking for a savior. Let's have a strong government, maybe socialist government, centralized. When we need some strong man, a savior comes and says, I will lead you. So we have two alternatives here. Civil war and invasion. Okay. See how it goes. The next stage is normalization. This is the reverse from destabilization. Basically, is stabilizing the country by force. The new rulers need stability to exploit the country, to take advantages of the victory. So no more revolutionaries, please. Speaker 0: And it's pretty crazy when you start to look at it from the context of this is Israel and the Jews, and they're behind all of the dark demonic stuff. They're behind the LGBTQ. They're behind the gays. They're behind the buying off our politicians, and they controlled our media. So when our media tries to tell you this Speaker 9: an opportunity to interview a Cuban intelligence asset agent. He had retired, defected, and he go went all way back to Castro. It was Castro and the Soviets early in his career. By the end of his time, he was with the Venezuelans, Iranians, and the Chinese. China and Cuba always looking to destabilize us. And he said, listen. I'm gonna just be honest with you. We're targeting your education system, and I'm gonna give you our five principles of warfare. It's easier to change a young mind than an older mind. It's easier to create instability when you create division in America. It's easier to create confusion when you normalize the abnormal. And if you portray law and order as fascism, you can tear down a democratic Western society. Now take those principles I just gave you and think about what teachers' unions and school districts brought into your schools in the last decade. Normalize the abnormal. Let's have a man go into women's bathroom pretending he's a female athlete and let him win all the awards on the podium. DEI and CRT were designed to create division to divide America between two classes of people, the oppressed and the oppressors. Speaker 0: Wait. Didn't Trump just get rid of all DEI? Oh, that's right. God's chosen people. They're okay. They can get selective favoritism because they're Jewish. Speaker 9: The oppressors are white people. The everyone else falls into the oppressed class. If you divide a country along those lines and you train children that that's the story, now you can start to create a protest movement that starts to bring down the country. The other thing he said is that in Marxism, crisis is the key. You have to keep creating another crisis to create the sense that your country is falling apart. Now think about the inscription on some of the bullets that were recently recovered in some of these assassination attempts. Catch this fascist. Fascism is anyone who believes in law and order, who believes in the Judeo Christian society. Those concepts have been brought into your school districts. They've been brought into your kids' classrooms. They've been brought into your child's Discord chat. Speaker 0: It's the Jews. At the end of the day, behind every dark demonic rabbit hole. It doesn't matter if it's the gay agenda. If it doesn't matter if it's the LGBTQ agenda. How do we get the LGBTQ agenda? How do we get gay rights? Oh, our politicians pass laws, and our politicians are controlled by APAC. And the most obvious one, because it was most recent, was our open borders. Do you think our open borders just happened by accident? Speaker 10: The only way we're gonna have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them. Because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers but get a path to citizenship for all 11,000,000 or however many undocumented there are here. Speaker 0: No. Do you think Joe Biden was super smart and came up with 93 executive orders? Oh, no. He didn't. That was Anthony Blinken. Anthony Blinken is who? One of god's chosen people. Mayorkas and the border patrol and the child trafficking empire that America turned into. Who was that? Mayorkas. What is he? One of god's chosen people. Xavier Becerra, health and human services, same thing. Who was in charge of the entire CDC, okay, during COVID nineteen? Who created the vaccine? The vaccine that's killing millions of people to this day. Who created that? It's god's chosen people. Do you understand how to how they take over and they have to indoctrinate with the education system? They have to take over our religious organizations, but it's the hearts and minds of the youth that they have to poison. Because when you get a revolution, right, it's easier to manipulate the minds of the youth, and it's also easier to get the youth out in the streets starting protests and riots and vandalizing things, right, than a 50 or 60 year old man. So you have to poison the hearts and minds of the youth, and that's what Charlie Kirk had the most. Right? With Charlie Kirk standing between their degenerate behavior, they wanted to promote the gay, the LGBTQ. Charlie Kirk wasn't having it. Charlie Kirk was going right to the universities where all these marked us in the indoctrination policy, they work when you're in an echo chamber and when you keep them with the blinders on. But when you have people like Charlie Kirk that are going there and asking logical questions and subverting their policy, that becomes detrimental to them. Then you mix in that they couldn't take over the education system, the LGBTQ agenda failed, their open borders were failing, last but not least was getting us to war with Iran, and Charlie Kirk was preventing that war from happening. So the big picture, if you really want my personal opinion why Charlie Kirk isn't with us anymore, is it's because the Jews were subverting our nation. In order to bring back their messiah, America has to fall. It's in their scripture, folks. It's in their religious textbooks. They believe that Rome must fall. We are the new Rome. You heard Benjamin Netanyahu say it in the video. Speaker 2: All place in the world that we will occupy in a war. We go to a war, we occupy. Let's say we occupy Lebanon. And over there, this idol worshiping places, We have the same obligation to destroy it. Why? Because now we live there. We occupy the place. We occupy the place. The Torah say, Don't leave anything, any idols among you. So every place that you live in, and now you're the original owner of the place now, you're the new owner, I should say. From now on, you have the same obligation to purify the place from all the idols. Speaker 0: Now we can we can avoid having this conversation. We cannot speak the truth. But at this point, you know, I don't think America can be saved unless a lot of us wake up immediately. We get our heads out of our ass. We haven't got mass deportations. We haven't got political We haven't got accountability. We haven't got transparency. We haven't got one gosh damn thing that we voted for. And now he's writing executive orders so that the children and the parents who have gotten cancer from the gosh damn Roundup that they were spraying, yep, they can't get any money. Just gonna have to go spend millions and millions of dollars on cancer treatments and most likely die because, well, fuck them. They're Americans. They're not Jews. God bless you guys. We all.
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 1:06 PM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@TimmyGs_312 https://t.co/6leFLgh3Hr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan Mehta says: "Tommy g is a little dick weasel, low IQ idiot." He adds that if you’re listening to morons like that and you are not stacking Bitcoin, you deserve to stay poor and broke like the little bitch you are. "Escape the matrix or listen to fact it's like Tommy g. The choice is yours."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Ryan Mehta, and I think Tommy g is a little dick weasel, low IQ idiot. And if you're listening to fucking morons like that and you are not stacking Bitcoin, you deserve to stay poor and broke like the little bitch you are. Escape the matrix or listen to fact it's like Tommy g. The choice is yours.
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 3:37 PM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@TimBallard I’m so glad you are exposing these child trafficking protecting scumbags! Keep em coming @TimBallard I’m just dropping by to boost the algo!

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 3:30 PM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@TimBallard @TimBallard let me know when the next film you have is ready to drop! Let me know how I can help promote it!

Saved - January 26, 2026 at 4:08 AM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The mega winter storm that is wreaking havoc on America is not a natural storm. This is Geo engineering at its finest, and we have undisputed proof that our military engineered the storm. https://t.co/N27l6m010N

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that in the last four years there have been four “once in a century storms,” naming hurricane Helene, the Maui fires, and California wildfires. They claim these events are part of a pattern of engineered weather, stating that “they openly admitted at Davos, and our government is geoengineering” and that chemicals such as nickel ion are sprayed into the sky from aircraft to soak up moisture. The white trails seen across the sky are described as absorbing water, expanding, and then being guided with frequencies and directed energy weapons to create these storms. The speaker asserts that there will be “undeniable…proof that our government engineered this storm,” and asks how long it would take before someone is imprisoned for poisoning a road with water that freezes and causes deadly accidents, using an analogy about a steep hill and a road turned to ice. They claim the coming storm will kill American citizens and wonder when those responsible will be held accountable, inviting viewers to check out the video for proof of government geoengineering. Speaker 1 responds by stating the elephant in the room: the flight path is not normal. They note four different planes, including a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, flying highly unusual patterns right before the historic ice storm. They explain that the Stratotanker is typically used for aerial refueling, but these patterns suggest otherwise, mentioning that the KC-135 Stratotanker “could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes, such as stratospheric aerosol injection,” which releases reflective particles to cool the planet. They imply the United States Air Force is seeding clouds before the storm, calling it a coincidence yet suggesting it is related to geoengineering. They describe “the produce, the chemtrail” of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles over the Front Range. Speaker 0 adds that not only is there fumigation across nearly every state ahead of the historic ice storm, but in Tennessee there are visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped into the atmosphere ahead of the storm, while suggesting it is not a coincidence. They note Texas appears cloudy, followed by Indiana, and then claim to observe “frequency waves.” Speaker 1 reiterates the focus on Oklahoma, underscoring the widespread pattern and the associated frequency waves as part of the atmospheric manipulation preceding the storm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the last four years, we have literally had, what, four now once in a century storms. The most famous one probably being hurricane Helene. We had the Maui fires. We had the California wildfires. We keep having these once in a century storms. We keep showing you guys. They just openly admitted at Davos, and our government is geoengineering. They are spraying chemicals into the sky. These are chemicals like nickel ion and all these other toxic garbage that that soak up moisture. So they spray these chemicals out of out of the wings of a plane. They're the white trails that you see flying across your sky. Those absorb water, they expand, and then they use frequencies and they use directed energy weapons to basically guide and steer these storms. And they create these, well, once in a century storms. The evidence that we are going to present you in this video will be undeniable. It'll be undisputable proof that our government engineered this storm. So my question to you is, let's say I live on a steep hill. Right? And this road's 50 mile per hour road. At the bottom of the steep hill is a sharp left turn. And as you're making that left turn, if you don't make it good, you're gonna go right into some giant oak trees. Okay? Now let's just say every time it got below zero, I went out there with my hose and I just soaked the road, and that would freeze and turn into a sheet of ice. Specifically, right at the bottom of that hill as those cars are trying to stop going 50 miles per hour going trying to make that left turn. I'm just gonna soak that road in water and let it freeze. Every week, somebody comes flying down that hill and crashes and dies because they can't stop. Sometimes it's a multiple car pile up. How long do you think it would be before I was in prison? Right? How long do you think it'd be before detectives realized that somebody was soaking that road with water, and then that water was freezing, and it was leading to the death of dozens of American citizens? How long do you think it'd be before I was in prison? Okay. Point taken. Okay? How long will it be? You know, this storm this storm is going to kill some American citizens. There's gonna be probably a dozen, maybe up to 50 people that are dead because of this storm by the time this is over. So my question is, when are we going to hold these scumbags accountable? Check out this video. This is undeniable proof that our government created and geo engineered this storm. I wanna know which one of these pilots that sprayed those chemicals in the sky is going to be going to prison for life for, you know, manslaughter. Let me know what you guys think. Check this video out. Speaker 1: Let's just talk about the elephant in the room. This is what most would consider not a very normal flight path. Neither is this one or this one. Yet we had the United States Air Force, four different planes, flying these highly unusual flight patterns right before this historic ice storm. And the aircraft that the USAF is flying in these highly abnormal flight patterns is none other than a Boeing KC-one 135 Stratotanker. The Stratotanker is typically an aircraft used for aerial refueling, but we can see by these flight patterns that is not what is taking place here. And I'm sure it's just a giant coincidence, but it does say here and I quote that the KC-one 135 Stratotanker could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes, such as stratospheric aerosol injection, which involves releasing reflective particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet. And call me a conspiracy theorist, but doesn't it seem a little odd that the United States Air Force is flying multiple Stratotankers seeding the clouds right before this historic ice storm? This is all the produce, the chemtrail produce of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles in patterns over this part of the Front Range. Speaker 0: And right here, you're looking at Oklahoma. Speaker 1: And not only do we have basically every state being fumigated ahead of this historic ice storm, but as you can see here in Tennessee, we also have very visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped in and infused into the atmosphere ahead of this storm. But I'm sure it's just all a giant coincidence. Speaker 0: Now you got Texas. Texas is looking mighty cloudy. Indiana, also looking mighty cloudy. And then lo and behold, here's your frequency waves.

@nogps1 - nogps

Coincidence? NO! We have way too much evidence now to demonstrate that the USAF is actively involved in the creation of this incoming major storm! How many lives need to be lost before people start waking up to what is happening? Remember the children lost to the storm in Texas Many thanks to Chanda Morse for this flight tracker information

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses what he calls the elephant in the room, noting that the flight paths in question are highly unusual for the United States Air Force. He points out that four different planes were involved, all following these abnormal flight patterns just before a historic ice storm. He identifies the aircraft as Boeing KC-one 135 Stratotankers, and observes that, while Stratotankers are typically used for aerial refueling, the flight patterns imply that this was not the case in these instances. He acknowledges a potential coincidence but highlights that the KC-one 135 Stratotanker “could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes such as stratospheric aerosol injection, which involves releasing reflective particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet.” He adds, “Call me a conspiracy theorist, but doesn’t it seem a little odd that the United States Air Force is flying multiple Stratotankers seeding the clouds right before this historic ice storm?” Speaker 1 reiterates the observation, stating that the flights are “the chemtrail produce of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles in patterns over this part of the Front Range,” emphasizing the circular and abnormal flight paths attributed to the Stratotankers. Speaker 0 continues by asserting that not only is most of the country appearing to be fumigated ahead of the historic ice storm, but he also points to Tennessee as a location where there are “very visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped in and infused into the atmosphere ahead of this storm.” He closes by again casting doubt on the situation, saying, “I’m sure it’s just all a giant coincidence.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's just talk about the elephant in the room. This is what most would consider not a very normal flight path. Neither is this one or this one. Yet we had the United States Air Force, four different planes, flying these highly unusual flight patterns right before this historic ice storm. And the aircraft that the USAF is flying in these highly abnormal flight patterns is none other than a Boeing KC-one 135 Stratotanker. The Stratotanker is typically an aircraft used for aerial refueling. But we can see by these flight patterns that is not what is taking place here. And I am sure its just a giant coincidence, but it does say here and I quote that the KC-one 135 Stratotanker could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes such as stratospheric aerosol injection, which involves releasing reflective particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but doesn't it seem a little odd that the United States Air Force is flying multiple Stratotankers seeding the clouds right before this historic ice storm? Speaker 1: This is all the chemtrail produce of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles in patterns over this part of the Front Range. Speaker 0: And not only do we have basically every state being fumigated ahead of this historic ice storm, but as you can see here in Tennessee, we also have very visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped in and infused into the atmosphere ahead of this storm. But I'm sure it's just all a giant coincidence.
Saved - January 24, 2026 at 11:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
MaryBowdenMD raises a claim that a 7-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis was medically kidnapped in Florida, with DCF allegedly laughing as the child was taken; WTPatriotsUSA is said to be advocating to return her. Ryanmatta and GooBiiSnacks request DMs. Another user questions why Jonathan, who offered an interview, isn’t mentioned and notes recent news.

@MaryBowdenMD - Mary Talley Bowden MD

A thriving 7 year old girl with cystic fibrosis has been medically kidnapped from her parents in Florida. DCF laughed when they took her from her home. @WTPatriotsUSA is fighting to bring her back. https://t.co/vjDZuPAri2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes obtaining body cam footage in which a DCF worker is laughing and smiling at the door as she takes a child away, while the child screams and the mother cries. The seven-year-old girl is shown laughing and saying, "I don't need a warrant, I don't need anything, I can take your child away before we file anything in court," as the child is taken away. The child was thriving and on a treatment that's been used for cystic fibrosis since the 1950s. The speaker cannot pronounce the drug names but notes they have them in records and court filings. The child was given a drug used since the 1950s; the child was without oxygen and was running around, playing, and laughing perfectly fine, while often children with cystic fibrosis need oxygen. After the state took the child away, the reason given ostensibly was that she wasn't using a newer drug with a black box warning shown to cause death, liver failure, and other adverse reactions. They reportedly did not even put the child on the newer drug for nearly three months after removing her. The child was placed in a foster home rather than with her parents or family members, even though the family wanted her placed with relatives. Instead, she was placed with strangers in foster care. The speaker describes this as evil. The group, We The Patriots USA, states they committed about a year ago to a mission to end medical kidnapping in America and to bring the child home. They have retained an attorney for the plaintiff and have paid the initial retainer, noting that thousands of dollars have already been spent on the case, even though they haven't raised all the funds yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I was able to get ahold of that body cam footage. One of the DCF workers was laughing and smiling as she's at the door and going to take this child away, screaming, child is crying, mother is crying, breaking down in tears. This seven year old girl laughing and saying, I don't need a warrant, I don't need anything, I can take your child away before we file anything in court, goes in and takes the child away. This child was thriving. She was on a treatment that's been used for cystic fibrosis since the 1950s. I can't pronounce drug names like you can because I'm not a doctor, but I forget the name of it, but I have it all in my records, it's in the court filings. She was giving this child a drug that's been used since the 1950s. The child was without oxygen. Often these children on cystic fibrosis, they need oxygen. She didn't have any oxygen, running around, playing, laughing perfectly fine. The state after they took the child away, and the reason they ostensibly took the child away is because she wasn't using this new drug, newer drug, I shouldn't say it's not brand new, but it's a newer drug with a black box warning shown to cause death, liver failure, all kinds of adverse reactions reported. They didn't even put the child on the drug for three months, almost three months after they took the child away. They didn't even put the child. They put her in a foster home, wouldn't put her with her parents or family members. She wanted the child to be placed with family members. Nope, we're gonna place her with strangers in foster care. Wow. I mean, is evil. This is pure evil. So we made a commitment here at We The Patriots USA about a year ago that we were gonna be on a mission to end medical kidnapping in America. That's medical kidnapping. There is no good reason that child should have been taken away from her mother. And we're gonna do everything in our power to bring that child home. We've retained an attorney for the plaintiff here. We paid already the initial retainer. Even though we haven't raised it, we've paid thousands of dollars for this case.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@MaryBowdenMD @WTPatriotsUSA @MaryBowdenMD please send me a DM if you see this.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@Ryanmatta @MaryBowdenMD @WTPatriotsUSA Hey @Ryanmatta please send me a DM if you see this. Why haven’t you mentioned Jonathan, the guy that offered you an interview? I find it hard to believe you haven’t seen the news. https://t.co/QV8ZQ1LP5T

Saved - January 23, 2026 at 11:26 PM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you think the Department of War would ever use directed energy weapons on American citizens? https://t.co/PvxRc2EEBT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that directed energy weapons (DEWs) have been used and acknowledged by the U.S. government, with claims tied to multiple contemporary events and controversial assertions. They reference Maui, claiming that directed energy weapons were used to set Maui ablaze so that billionaires could drive out locals and buy real estate cheaply, and they note a recent Department of Defense tweet as supposed proof. The speaker highlights Owen Shroyer’s attention to the tweet, quoting it as saying the Department of War “has directed energy weapons. Yes. We are scaling them,” and describes DEWs as giant high-powered lasers that heat clouds after cloud seeding, creating a “perfect storm.” They connect this to “the perfect storm” coming across America. The discussion then shifts to alleged false flags produced by combining DEWs with other actions. The speaker cites Owen Shroyer, again, and references Ezra’s remarks, stating that “the World Economic Forum elites openly admit that chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere to cool the planet even on the food supply,” and that “one insider admitted that most of these operations are handled by the military, carried out quietly and behind closed doors.” They place blame on political elites, describing Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi as “filthy rich, robbing the American tax player blind,” and contrast this with Iliana Omar’s wealth growth from negative $65,000 to $30,000,000 in five years. They criticize Fauci and Mayorkas, labeling Fauci a “career bureaucrat” who, according to the speaker, “injected our children with a deadly bioweapon chemical cocktail,” and note Fauci remained on a government salary with security detail during Trump’s presidency. The speaker then discusses a third type of DEW: frequency-based methods, including audio frequency devices that can be carried in a backpack and used on crowds, allegedly as part of the January 6 events. They assert that DEWs were used to agitate the crowd, along with 250 undercover FBI agents dressed as Trump supporters, and Capitol Police openings fire on protesters. The speaker asserts that the very DEWs “have killed people before,” and speculates this could have contributed to a Capitol Police officer’s heart attack that day. In closing, the speaker asks the audience whether they trust their government and government officials with this type of power, inviting responses in the comments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So do you guys remember when Maui caught on fire and we knew that there was directed energy weapons that were used to basically set Maui ablaze so that the billionaires could drive out all the locals and buy up their real estate for pennies on the dollar? Whatever happened to Maui? How come nobody's talking about that? Well, maybe they will now. Actually, we've seen this recent tweet from the Department of Defense. Big shout out to my man Owen Schroyer for putting this one on the radar, and he says the conspiracy theorists just keep winning. And this is a to a tweet that the Department of Defense put out or the Department of War says, yes. The Department of War has directed energy weapons. Yes. We are scaling them. Oh, great. Yet again, conspiracy theorists were right. We told you that our government had these directed energy weapons. These are giant high powered lasers that has the ability to basically they shoot a laser into a cloud. You have the ability to heat that cloud. Do you understand how this works? So they go and they cloud seed, then they use the director energy weapons to change the temperature, and then you have cold weather, hot weather combining, and you have the perfect storm. Right? Perfect storm. Kinda like the one that's coming across America right now. Weird how that happens, isn't it? So if you think that was bad enough, now let's talk about the next thing that they admitted that when you combine with directed energy weapons, you get, well, false flags. Check this out. My man Owen Schroyer coming in with the heat again saying the conspiracy theorists are right yet again. And this was in response to a tweet put out by the legend himself, shadow of the Ezra. If you guys aren't following shadow, give him and Owen a follow. I'll leave links below. It says the World Economic Forum elites openly admit that chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere to cool the planet even on the food supply. One insider admitted that most of these operations are handled by the military, carried out quietly and behind closed doors. So So let's just kinda put this into perspective. Okay? We know how corrupt our career politicians are. You know, any one of these politicians, Lindsey Graham to Chuck Schumer to Nancy Pelosi, filthy rich, robbing the American tax player blind. Okay? We can't even arrest Iliana Omar who started in congress, you know, five years ago with a net worth of negative $65,000. And today, she's worth 30,000,000. Five years later, with a salary of $175,000 a year. Explain it to me like I'm five how this works. Then you take a look at people like Alejandro Mayorkas. How about let's use Fauci. Fauci's even worse. A career bureaucrat who even after he injected our children with a deadly bioweapon chemical cocktail that was designed to chemically castrate, murder, neuter, or make a big a big pharma patient for life. That's what the vaccine was designed to do. That scumbag still had his full security detail when Trump was elected. Doctor Fauci was still on a government salary. Okay? So you mean to tell me that our politicians who are in office forever are routed to the core, our bureaucrats who are in office are forever are routed to the core. You mean to tell me that you don't think that our military generals who have been in The US Military for twenty, thirty, forty years and have seen it all and went through the Iraq war, all the money laundering, all the bribes, all the kickbacks, all the drugs, all the gun smuggling, all of it. Like, you think that our our that that the FBI just magically smuggles drugs and money and guns into countries? Without our military support, you are out of your mind. Now let's talk about the last type of directed energy weapon, which is frequency. Your government has the ability to play audio sounds on loudspeakers from trucks, from car windows, from a megaphone in a in a hotel window, and they have the ability to take this device, which can fit into a backpack. They have that ability to take that device anywhere and use it on crowds of American citizens just like they did on January 6. Yes. You heard that right. On January 6, on top of the FBI sending in 250 undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters to stoke up the crowds and start violence, on top of having DC Capitol Police officers open fire on innocent protestors, your military, your Department of Defense was using a directed energy weapon to agitate the crowd. Those same directed energy weapons have killed people before. We already know they've killed people before. That could have been what led to the man the DC Capitol Police officer having a heart attack that day. I just got one question for you, America. Do you trust your government? Do you trust government officials and these corrupt politicians with this type of power? Let me know down in the comments.
Saved - January 12, 2026 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m promoting my documentary Never in America, pulling back the curtain on alleged government misconduct around CPS, medical kidnapping, and child trafficking. I share the Baby Cyrus case and testimonies claiming a federal funding pipeline rewards taking children, urging viewers to watch on YouTube and Rumble, support via GiveSendGo, and share widely to expose these issues. I thank supporters and invite more voices to join.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

In my new documentary, Never in America, we pull back the curtain on one of the darkest corners of our government.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If you can afford to skip a cup of coffee and support my work. Please visit givesendgo.com/ryanmattafilms

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Thank you big E. You the man homie

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Never in America full documentary on Rumble. https://rumble.com/v724pje-never-in-america-unmasking-cpss-kidnapping-empire.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

It’s amazing watching so many hero’s coming together to expose the most satanic part of the American government.

@MichaelJaco9 - Michael Jaco

🔥 Baby Cyrus: The Government Kidnapping Exposed — CPS, Hospitals & the Trafficking Machine The Baby Cyrus case isn’t just a story — it’s proof of a government-subsidized child-trafficking pipeline hiding in plain sight. In this high-impact highlight reel, Michael Jaco and Diego Rodriguez expose how an innocent baby was ripped from his family by corrupt authorities working under CPS — and how this SAME system is targeting families across America right now. 💥 Medical kidnapping 💥 CPS corruption 💥 Hospital coercion 💥 Police enforcement for profit 💥 Government-subsidized trafficking networks This is the reel every parent, patriot, and truth-seeker needs to see. 🎥 FULL EPISODE on YouTube: 👉 https://youtube.com/live/N-XoPCuAtgE 📚 Learn the full Baby Cyrus story: 👉 https://freedomman.gs/cyrus/ 🎬 Watch Never in America Documentary (Ryan Matta): 👉 🎙️ PODCAST RELEASES TODAY at 4PM PT Listen on Podbean: 👉 https://michaelkjaco.podbean.com (https://michaelkjaco.podbean.com/) 📺 Watch Michael’s LIVE shows: YouTube ➡️ https://youtube.com/user/michaeljaco Rumble ➡️ https://rumble.com/user/michaelj5326 🌐 More from Michael Jaco: 👉 https://michaelkjaco.com (https://michaelkjaco.com/) #BabyCyrus #CPScorruption #MedicalKidnapping #ChildTrafficking #DiegoRodriguez #MichaelJaco #NeverInAmerica #RyanMatta #ProtectTheChildren #TruthSeekers #StayInTheLoveVibrations

Freedom Man | Baby Cyrus freedomman.gs
Unleashing Intuition Secrets | Michael Jaco New podcast: Ex-Navy Seal and CIA specialist Michael Jaco teaches you how to tap into your Intuition and Unleash the Power within, so you can become the Master of your Reality. michaelkjaco.podbean.com
Unleashing Intuition Secrets | Michael Jaco New podcast: Ex-Navy Seal and CIA specialist Michael Jaco teaches you how to tap into your Intuition and Unleash the Power within, so you can become the Master of your Reality. michaelkjaco.podbean.com
Michael Jaco Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. youtube.com
Michael K Jaco Michael K Jaco is a former Navy Seal & CIA operator, Intuitive Guide, Life-Changing Trainer, Author, Speaker & Life Developer michaelkjaco.com
Michael K Jaco Michael K Jaco is a former Navy Seal & CIA operator, Intuitive Guide, Life-Changing Trainer, Author, Speaker & Life Developer michaelkjaco.com

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

In my new documentary, Never in America, we pull back the curtain on one of the darkest corners of our government.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MccjjT2KVtE

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Special thanks to the team at @VigilantFox and Maria @zeeemedia for giving us a chance to share our story. https://t.co/qcsFamdzD0

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: A powerful new documentary is triggering national outrage as families step forward to expose what they say is government-funded child kidnapping carried out under the banner of CPS. Testimony after testimony reveals a system that can rip a child from loving parents, then bury them in lawfare the moment they fight back. The film centers on Baby Cyrus, an Idaho infant taken after doctors misdiagnosed his rare vomiting condition and turned that failure into false claims of neglect. His grandfather, Diego Rodriguez, says this is happening everywhere, and the numbers prove it. The documentary shows 480,000 children taken by CPS last year, with CPS admitting it was wrong 83.3 percent of the time. More than half of those children never see their parents again, roughly 215,000 families permanently shattered. Rodriguez warns the deeper cause is a federal funding pipeline that rewards taking children instead of protecting families. The full documentary, posted by @RyanMattaMedia, shows how fast this nightmare can happen to anyone. Watch it, share it, and stay alert. View the full report: 👇 https://rumble.com/v7275u2-breakthrough-nattokinase-dissolves-84-of-amyloid-microclots-within-2-hours-.html

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Drug testing labs in Georgia were just busted for failing drug tests for parents who never did drugs so that the state could take their children. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWqVlI5ABGA

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@BTCzcv I hope so. We need about 10,000 quote tweets to. Get this to 1,000,000+ views. We need about 5,000,000 views to really make an impact

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@and_prophecy Welcome to the Golden ages right

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Michaelward_88 These are the stories that break your heart. Please record a video and tell your story. Post it in these comments.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Astraal_Majjic It’s happening in almost every CPS case in American history.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@forloveofJ @BlackmanForAZ @RJ4arizona @realAlexKolodin @AZDCSWarriors @AzPinkLady Yeah, and what’s Trump done to change it not shit. Trump’s a goddamn coward he could fix this shit with one executive order he doesn’t.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@BeachySylvia It’s the heaviest burden is the worst most corrupt, disgusting government, organization, and the fact that we just sit by as American citizens and allow it to kidnap our children is disgusting beyond means means

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@NomadLineman78 @tammietubman You got tha straight!

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@mommadj75 Thank you so much, we will see. I doubt Trump will do anything to fix this.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@gold225275863 It's so sick what these people are doing to these children.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Astraal_Majjic Thanks for sharing brother!

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@herbpeddler I’m asking every family to record videos and tell there story and not one family has. This film needs to get shared into every Facebook page in America!

Saved - January 12, 2026 at 7:42 AM

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The haters will claim that these photos are AI. https://t.co/p5T9CrOVga

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Haters claim the photos are AI-generated. - I am here to confirm with 100% certainty that Kyle Seraphin took these photos. - The photos show Dan Bongino at Cash Patel's "I'm Coming Out of the Closet" party. - Nobody was supposed to see these photos; they were for private eyes only. - It has been confirmed that Bongino is absolutely a bitch.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now a lot of the haters out there, they're gonna tell you that these photos that you're looking at here on the screen are AI. But I am here to confirm that with 100% certainty that Kyle Seraphin is the one who took these photos. This is actually Dan Bongino at Cash Patel's I'm Coming Out of the Closet party. Now nobody was supposed to see these photos. They were for, you know, private eyes only, but it has been confirmed that Bongino is absolutely a bitch.
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:06 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Breaking news, the new Unredacted CIA files proves that Israel orchestrated the assassination of President JFK. https://t.co/riYcNEQfKJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on newly declassified CIA files and old JFK assassination records, with a key claim that Israel was involved in JFK’s assassination. The main points asserted are: - CIA files allegedly show that James Arlington, a top CIA officer, had connections to Israel intelligence and subverted President Kennedy’s policy to prevent Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons. Arlington was praised by Mossad head Emmett as “the biggest Zionist of them all.” - Arlington allegedly hid documents from the Warren Commission about the Kennedy assassination. Shortly before his death, Arlington purportedly stated, “the better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would have been promoted.” The file, previously released in 02/17/18 and 2022 in redacted form, is now unredacted. - The material is presented as proof that “Israel assassinated JFK,” and the speaker expresses disbelief about why Israel would act this way. - In a separate thread, Speaker 1 discusses anti-Semitism online, plans to battle it, and proposes creating a division within the State Department to handle technology and revamp the office to be highly prominent. - Speaker 2 questions how a US official could advocate censorship of citizens, arguing that it would be illegal and contrasting it with free speech. References are made to the Biden administration, the US government, and the potential firing of an official for statements. - Speaker 0 returns to a broader claim that American citizens are losing their First Amendment rights to expose truths about Israel. The argument is that exposing such truths would provoke a countrywide revolt, and a critique is leveled at those who would silence speech. The speaker urges compliance as a way to avoid tyranny, suggesting that “you’re gonna pass this burden … onto your children,” and concludes with “Trust me. You can comply your way out of tyranny.” Overall, the transcript juxtaposes declassified material and theories about Israel’s involvement in JFK’s assassination with discussions about censorship, speech rights, and governmental efforts to regulate or revamp technology-related oversight in the State Department, all framed by a provocative stance on silencing discourse about Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is anybody sick of winning yet? Because, we got new declassified CIA files that show, guess who killed JFK. Guess who killed the president of The United States had his head blown off on live TV. Does that sound familiar? Oh, wait. Okay. So let's dive into these WikiLeaks files and big shout out to Jimmy Dorr for putting this one on our radar. He goes by at Jimmy underscore Dorr over on x. And he says, CIA suppressed tops officer James Arlington's connections to Israel intelligence as shown by the newly unredacted JFK assassination record file. Arlington had subverted JFK's policy of preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons and was praised by Mossad's head, Emmett, as the biggest Zionist of them all. Arlington was also found to have hidden documents from the Warren Commission on the assassination of president Kennedy. Shortly before he died, Arlington stated, the better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would have been promoted. Outside of their duplicity, the only thing that they had in common was their desire for absolute power. The file was previously released in 02/1718, and 2022 in redacted form. And lo and behold, now we have it. And what does it prove? That Israel assassinated JFK. So I can't wrap my head around. Why? Why? Why? Israel would be acting like this. Speaker 1: How do we battle antisemitism on the Internet? How are we doing better on algorithms? What companies can we work with? We are gonna have a whole division within the office to work on technology. The office is going to be revamped entirely to be one of the highest profile offices in the state department. Speaker 2: How can a US official say that? Why should the US government be trying to censor its own citizens? Like, thought that was, first of all, illegal. I thought we ran against that. That was the Biden administration. But isn't that, like how is that different from slavery? If you can't say what you Well, I believe don't know. It's a form of bondage. It's like I'm not treating you as a as a human being, as a free man if I won't allow you to say what you what you think. This guy's standing up at some event with a bunch of lunatics saying Yeah. But I'm The US state of Florida. Americans, and I'm a work for the US government. How about you get fired today? Speaker 0: So right now, we, the American citizens, have to lose our ability to speak in our first amendment, our god given rights because lo and behold, if anybody were to expose the truth about Israel, I mean, the entire country revolt and turn on them. Right? So you're gonna be a peasant and a tax slave for the rest of your life and you're gonna force your children to be tax slaves because you wanna shut up, you wanna keep your mouth shut, you want the easy road. So you're gonna pass this burden, this toxic, filthy, disgusting, vile state of Israel. You're gonna pass that burden onto your children. Yeah. Good. Keep your mouth shut. Don't do anything. It's gonna get better. Trust me. You can comply your way out of tyranny.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Josh Hammer is calling for Candace Owens to be institutionalized. This is the same playbook Epstein’s clients used to silence their victims. https://t.co/EviBm12Trk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mary Morgan Ariel (Morgan Ariel on X) notes that Josh Hammer is now calling for Candace to be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. A clip is shown in which a commentator says, “In a just society, she’d be in a mental ward right now” and that they are a proponent of bringing back involuntary commitment laws of the 1960s, arguing that she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum. The discussion then connects this rhetoric to the way Epstein’s victims were treated in the past. The narrative then shifts to Karen Mulder, a former top model, who in 2001 went on a talk show and frantically named everyone who had assaulted her or involved her in being sold for assault. Her list reportedly included royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. Before finishing, she was taken off the stage and eventually placed in a psych ward funded by Gerald Marie, the agent and owner of Elite Paris, who had signed her at 15. Marie would later be prosecuted on rape and sexual assault claims, but the case was closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, a outcome the speaker suggests could have been avoided if the matter had been taken seriously earlier. Mulder also named Jean Luc Brunel, an Epstein associate who was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors and was found dead in his cell in 2022. Following Mulder’s 2001 interview, Morris publications claimed she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents publicly blamed the outburst on drugs, and her sister Saskia appeared on the same talk show to discredit her, suggesting Saskia was also a victim. The account notes that Mulder’s reporting of abuse and childhood trauma fueled media attention and tabloid sensationalism, which led to her being labeled crazy. Mulder attempted suicide in 2002 but survived and later returned to confront the host, who pulled Mulder off air and deleted the tape of her testimony. The existence of the footage is inferred from testimonies in tabloids, Mulder’s statements, and audience comments. The discussion also references a TikTok influencer who described human trafficking as “the new satanic panic.” The speaker expresses distress at the comment and ties it to the broader pattern of desensitization around the Epstein Files; they argue that when there is no conclusion, people turn to humor, though they acknowledge the impulse to do so and caution against reducing the real trauma involved. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the issue, noting that victims can become perpetrators and that the situation remains critical. Karen Mulder is identified as being 55 years old at the time of the recount.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do Josh Hammer and Jeffrey Epstein's clients all have in common? Oh, when they get exposed, they start calling to have people instituted in mental institutions. Oh, really? Well, according to Mary Morgan Ariel, if you aren't following her, she goes by at Morgan Ariel over on X. She says, Josh Hammer is now calling for Candace. I want to be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. Let me play this clip, and then let me show you who else was calling for people to be put in mental institutions. Check this out. Speaker 1: In a in a just society, she'd be in a mental ward right now. She would have been in an immense award a while ago. I personally am a big proponent to bringing back the involuntary commitment laws of nineteen sixties. In my view, she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum. Speaker 0: Sounds a lot like what they were doing to, Epstein victims, doesn't it? Check this out. Speaker 2: 2001, one of the most sought after models in the world goes on a talk show. She, Karen Mulder, frantically starts name dropping everyone that had either assaulted her or sold her to be assaulted. This list would include royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. But before she'd be done getting through that list, she'd be taken off the stage and eventually put into a psych ward paid for by the very person she claimed started selling her in the first place, her agent and owner of Elite Paris, the man who signed her at just 15 years old, Gerald Marie, who, by the way, would be prosecuted years later with an insurmountable amount of rape and sexual assault claims, only for the case to be closed in 2023 due to France's statute of limitations, which could have been avoided if anyone in the French courts had taken her seriously at the time she reported them because, yes, she did report them. And if that wasn't enough, I have something even more infuriating. One of the names she dropped during that talk show was Jean Luc Brunel. He was an Epstein associate who was found dead in his cell in 2022. He was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors. Sorry. Hold on. After Karen's 2001 interview, Morris publications would come out claiming that she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents would publicly blame this outburst on drugs, and her sister Saskia would go on that same talk show just to discredit her sister, which may sound surprising. But remember, part of her desperate plea for someone to listen and do something included the abuse she endured in her childhood. So it's safe to say Saskia was also a victim. It's complicated, but it fueled the media and it fueled the tabloids to call her crazy, and she tried to take her own life in 2,002. Thankfully, she survived and she'd returned to that same talk show to confront the host, heard this desperate plea, pulled her from air, and then deleted the tape so the video of her speaking her truth would be scrapped altogether. The reason that we know this exists is because of his testimonies in the tabloids, hers, and audience members. Everyone called her crazy until the Epstein case started coming out. I read someone here on TikTok, female influencer with a lot of followers comment once on a video and say that human trafficking was like the new satanic pan. I remember it had a lot of likes, and I was so disturbed then. And I'm even more disturbed that comment lives in my head when I read the story because that interview could have saved twenty years of children. Twenty years. And to be put in a psych ward by the very man who first did it, who, by the way, was the ex husband of Linda Evangelista. Feel free to go down that rabbit hole. This isn't satanic panic. This is real. And the idea of it being satanic panic, like this huge, silly conspiracy everyone's talking about is actually so destructive. And I feel like the desensitization that we have towards Epstein Files is becoming more and more rampant because when something is so devastating and so traumatizing and we're not getting a conclusion, our go to is to turn it into humor, which I do get. I'm not villainizing anyone for that. But if we're gonna do that, we still have to keep this level of anger. It's still happening. And a lot of the victims, the people that once were victims are now perpetrators. It's that deep. It is that serious. Karen is 55 years old now. She is still a person in this world. She exists, and her only mistake was not doing that interview on a live television show. In 2001, one of the most sought after models in the world goes Speaker 0: on Speaker 2: a talk

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

President Trump leaves a reporter speechless after claiming we are just going to kill people who are brining drugs into our country. https://t.co/NVg3rq2tku

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 introduces humor about President Trump, saying, “I give president Trump quite a hard time, but sometimes that dude is just funny as hell. Check this out.” Speaker 1 asks, “And mister president, if you are declaring war against these cartels and congress is likely to approve of that process, why not just ask for a declaration of war?” Speaker 2 responds, “Well, I don't think we're gonna necessarily ask for a declaration of war. I think we're just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. Okay? We're gonna kill them. You know? They're gonna be, like, dead. Okay? Mister president. Yeah. Mister president.” Speaker 0 reiterates, “I don't think we need a declaration of war. We're just gonna we're just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, and they're gonna they're gonna be dead. Okay. Yeah. Like it was just no big deal, man. We're just we're just killing people without trial, without a jury, without being convicted of a crime. You know? We're just we're just gonna kill them. Okay? Dude's funny as hell.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I give president Trump quite a hard time, but sometimes that dude is just funny as hell. Check this out. Speaker 1: And mister president, if you are declaring war against these cartels and congress is likely to approve of that process, why not just ask for a declaration of war? Speaker 2: Well, I don't think we're gonna necessarily ask for a declaration of war. I think we're just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. Okay? We're gonna kill them. You know? They're gonna be, like, dead. Okay? Mister president. Yeah. Mister president. Speaker 0: I don't think we need a declaration of war. We're just gonna we're just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, and they're gonna they're gonna be like dead. Okay. Yeah. Like it was just no big deal, man. We're just we're just killing people without trial, without a jury, without being convicted of a crime. You know? We're just we're just gonna kill them. Okay? Dude's funny as hell.
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:04 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why would the FBI director shut down an investigation that was trying to determine if a foreign intelligence agency was involved in the Charlie Kirk assassination? https://t.co/LrLHuYAors

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video centers on Candace and a claim about Egyptian private military contractors being flown to America on a top-secret mission and landing at a private military base in Utah on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters show photos of private military subcontractors and describe them as the “baddest, hardest, most battle trained” soldiers, implying their involvement is significant to the Charlie Kirk case. They question why Egyptian military contractors would be in Provo, Utah, and why they did not return to Cairo, asking who they were planning to “take out next.” One speaker states that, according to a person close to someone who was aboard the flight, the aircraft did not simply stop in Utah for routine servicing. They claim the plane carried military subcontractors and that these individuals were dropped off in Provo, yet did not reboard for Cairo. They assert the flight departed Provo on September 10 and returned to Cairo on September 11, with allegedly missing people from the plane. The speaker emphasizes that the flight radar investigation shows a Cairo-to-Paris-to-France-to-Bannat, North Dakota route around that period, and notes that on September 10 the plane departed Provo at 07:14 AM local time. They insist the people aboard the plane were not the same individuals who later appeared on the flight’s return. The speaker contends this information was provided by a female source who knows an Egyptian military subcontractor personally. They acknowledge she did not claim the mission was related to Charlie Kirk, only that it was a top-secret operation, possibly a discreet joint military exercise, so hidden that people were urged to ignore it. The speaker describes the revelation as terrifying yet galvanizing, claiming it prompted bravery and a push to root out perceived evil in society. The discussion then shifts to Kash Patel, referencing a Daily Mail article about him shutting down a Charlie Kirk foreign intelligence probe in a feud with Trump’s counterterror chief. The speaker suggests Patel’s stance raises questions and asserts that Patel’s approach contrasts with what they would expect if there were genuine efforts to investigate Charlie Kirk’s murder, noting that Trump and Trump family members would presumably be involved in questioning the narrative. They criticize Patel for discouraging further inquiry, comparing him to Dr. Fauci in his alleged resistance to investigation. The speaker challenges Kash Patel to dispute the claims, asking him to confirm whether the plane truly came for routine servicing or for a discreet mission, and to disclose the truth about who was aboard and why they were in Provo, Utah.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Before I let this video play, we're gonna play the whole story about Candace and these private military contractors. I just wanted to give you, the audience, an idea. Every photo you're seeing on the screen behind me here is of private military subcontractors. Do you know who these guys are? These are the baddest, hardest, most battle trained motherfuckers on the planet. Right? These are normally your green berates, your navy seals. These people went to war. They took bullets downrange, and they came back alive because they're badass soldiers. Like, they're the hardest of the hardest. You guys can just tell by looking at some of these guys. This is what they look like. So I wanted to give you an idea of what these people look like. So when you hear this video of Candace and you start to think to yourself, okay. Why were Egyptian private military contractors being flown in to America on a top secret mission and they landed at a private military base in Utah the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. And then magically, they didn't make it on the plane back to Egypt. Why would that be? And what in the hell are they doing here? And if they had anything or in any way, shape, or form connected to Charlie Kirk assassination, why the fuck are they still in our country? And who are they planning to take out next? And this really makes you ask questions when you start asking yourself, why in the hell would Kash Patel be throwing a fit when he heard that Joe Kent, one of, like, Tulsi Gabbard's number two, was going and doing a separate investigation just to determine if there was any military involvement or foreign intelligence involvement in the Charlie Kirk assassination. You're gonna wanna watch this whole video. Check this out. Speaker 1: Before I say it, and I feel that I have been presented with absolute solid proof from this individual who is in proximity, to one of the individuals that was aboard this flight. Okay? I can now report to you that it is a fact that on 09/04, there were, this was not some dropping by in Utah as they were trying to claim because the the plane needed to be serviced. That's what they ran with. They ran with this could have been a re a routine servicing. I guess there's just no place from Egypt all the way to Utah that an Egyptian military plane can, like, get a tire changed. This is totally routine. Nothing to see here. Well, I'm telling you that for a fact, that plane was carrying military subcontractors. And for a fact, they were dropped off in Provo. Okay? And that they did not make it back to Cairo. They showed you I I showed you the plane left. They left on September 10. It then laid over in Wilmington, Delaware and departed back for Cairo on the eleventh. I am telling you that when that plane left, okay, those people were mysteriously missing from that plane. Okay? What's going on here? Why are Egyptian military subcontractors what are Egyptian military subcontractors doing in the middle of Provo, Utah on the day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Okay? You again, I am saying as a fact, Kash Patel, please feel free to dispute this. In fact, I I almost demand that you dispute it. I think you must. You've been saying everybody's conspiracy conspiracies are dangerous. Thinking is dangerous. That aircraft was not in Utah for any routine servicing. Okay? Rather extraordinarily, this person told me that it was there on some discreet mission. So discreet that this individual was scared for their life to present this information, but felt compelled to present it because they too were horrified like the rest of the world. Again, the mistake that was made here was executing him publicly. People felt something. Right? They felt something. They they they understood that whatever happened here was a tremendous act of evil. And so what it led to was goodness. More goodness. More people standing up and doing something brave and saying, we need to root out this evil from our society. What were they doing there? When did they leave? Who are these individuals? I don't understand. Kakash Patel, tell us about this flight. Tell us who was on it. Okay? I wanted to be very thorough here in presenting this information. So I was like, let's actually upgrade our flight radar account so we can go back three years on this plane's flight history, which is really the max setting that you can have on flight radar if you got a business account. And here is what we pulled together for you guys so that you don't have to pay for a business account, which is way too expensive, Especially for me who doesn't actually use flight radar often, but I am doing whatever I can to solve the murder of Charlie Kirk. Here it is. Three years. You can see November in 2022. We can go back as far as November and December of that year. We can see that it routinely flies through Paris. And I noticed and you can take your time to freeze this and go through everything because I'm not gonna read it all. I noticed that the trend here is that it always flies to an air force base. Okay? Look in 2025. If you look under 2025, you will see this is what it did. It went from September 4. September 4, it went from Cairo to Paris to France to Bannat, North Dakota. On September 10, it departed Provo I think I'm missing one here. Right? It didn't no. Departed. That's right. September 10, it departed Provo, Utah at 07:14AM local time. Okay? And I am telling you that aboard that plane, it was not the same people that got onto that plane. Okay? That is what I am told by this individual. She is saying that what actually took place was that they had some Egyptian military subcontractors person that she knows intimately. I would not have taken this to the bank. I had to really walk her through having the courage to do this any further. And I am certain that this happened. And I am certain, I feel, and feel like the rest of us feel, that we are not getting a full picture. Now I will again stress that this individual never ever said that the mission, the secret mission was related to Charlie Kirk. In fact, they were explicit that they weren't entirely sure what the specific mission was, but that it was top secret. Maybe playing devil's advocate. Right? And to be clear, when you play devil's advocate, you're advocating for the devil. That's what I'm actually kinda doing here. But maybe it was a joint military exercise of some description that was so discreet so discreet that it required just like, you know, everybody to ignore it for the military to boost a random account to pretend that it was nothing to lie and pretend that this per that this plane was here because it needed to be serviced in some capacity. That's not true. But maybe it was because, look, joint military exercise between Egypt and America for some unknown reason and Provo, Utah was the place they had to do this. And they decided to leave this plane and maybe people are still in Utah. I don't know, but I'm demanding that we find out. Okay. And when you couple that information with what was trending yesterday, right, this is the headline that came out of the Daily Mail, Kash Patel shuts down Charlie Kirk foreign intelligence probe in an explosive feud with Trump's counterterror chief. It really makes you wonder what Cash Patel is hiding. There's absolutely no reason for Cash Patel to say, only I'm the person that's supposed to be looking into this. It makes no sense. If he is interested in solving Charlie Kirk's murder, then Cash Patel would be working with everyone. Everyone across all departments would be locking arms and saying, Charlie Kirk was a wonderful friend. He did everything he could to put this administration into power. In fact, Trump would be late night tweeting being like, I don't accept this narrative. Trump would be asking questions. His sons would be asking questions. Turning Point USA executives would be asking questions. But instead, Kash Patel is saying, don't ask questions. Everything that you're hearing is is a conspiracy. He homie has really turned into doctor Fauci. Okay? This is like doctor doctor Kash Patel Fauci here who's telling us that to look any further would be somehow wrong to the legacy of Charles. It would be harmful for us to ask questions. It would be harmful for us to think. That's what I'm saying. Stop thinking. So that's the phase that we are at where people are trying to pretend that to protect Charlie's legacy, we have to say less. It's the exact opposite. We have to say more. And, again, I am personally challenging you, Kash Patel, and your super transparent super transparent administration, to dispute what I'm saying. Tell us in confidence that this plane came in by itself because it just needed, to be serviced. You know? Just nothing.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The FBI needs to immediately explain why Egyptian military subcontractors were dropped off at a military based in Utah on secret mission the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. https://t.co/WwqBwLpGLf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace Owens is presented as promising “the heat” and discusses a troubling incident involving alleged private Egyptian military contractors. The visual reference shows several men described as private Egyptian military contractors on screen, with the implication that they are connected to a secretive mission. Candace Owens is said to be about to explain a plane that flew over to America, landed in Utah, and carried military contractors or subcontractors who did not return on the plane that took off on September 11. The claim is that these individuals were involved in a private, secret mission so terrifying that the information source felt threatened for their life, yet felt compelled to share it publicly. The presenter urges viewers to check this information out. Speaker 1 asserts, with purported “absolute solid proof” from an individual close to one of the people who was aboard the flight, that on September 4 there was no routine stop in Utah for servicing. The speaker questions the claim that the plane’s stop in Utah was for routine servicing, arguing that an Egyptian military plane would not require tire changes or servicing in Utah and stating that the plane was carrying military subcontractors and that they were dropped off in Provo. The account claims that these subcontractors did not return to Cairo, noting that the plane left and then stopped in Wilmington, Delaware, before departing back to Cairo on September 11. The speaker emphasizes that, when the plane left, those people were mysteriously missing from the plane. The claim is reiterated: Egyptian military subcontractors were in Utah on September 4 (or around that date) for reasons not disclosed and not for routine maintenance. The assertion is made that the flight’s presence in Utah was connected to a discreet mission, to the extent that the person providing the information feared for their life but decided to present it because they were horrified like the rest of the world. The speaker contrasts this with criticisms previously leveled at Kash Patel, suggesting that such conspiracies are dangerous and challenging him to dispute the claims, framing the matter within a broader narrative of confronting perceived evil. The transcript closes by noting that the mistake was executing the information publicly, and that people felt something significant, which led to courage and action to root out what is described as evil in society, resulting in more people standing up and doing something brave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember when we told you that Candace Owens is gonna be bringing the heat? It was probably gonna be a really, really bad week for Kash Patel. See these gentlemen standing here on the screen behind me? Those are private Egyptian military contractors. So just in case you wanna get an idea of what a private military Egyptian contractor might look like, that's one of them right there. So Candice is about to tell you about a little plane that happened to come over to America in Utah and happened to land in Utah and was carrying military contractors or subcontractors, and they didn't make it back on the plane that took off on the eleventh. So who are these gentlemen? What were they doing here? Oh, and by the way, they were here on a private secret top secret military well, maybe not military, private mission that was so terrifying that the person that gave Candace this information felt threatened for her life or his life. So you guys are gonna wanna check this one out. Check this out. Speaker 1: Saying, before I say it, and I feel that I have been presented with absolute solid proof from this individual who is in proximity, to one of the individuals that was aboard this flight. Okay? I can now report to you that it is a fact that on 09/04, there were, this was not some dropping by in Utah as they were trying to claim because the the plane needed to be serviced. That's what they ran with. They ran with, this could have been a re a routine servicing. I guess there's just no place from Egypt all the way to Utah that an Egyptian military plane can, like, get a tire changed. This is totally routine. Nothing you see here. Well, I'm telling you that for a fact, that plane was carrying military subcontractors. And for a fact, they were dropped off in Provo. Okay? And that they did not make it back to Cairo. They showed you I I showed you the plane left. They left on September 10. It then laid over in Wilmington, Delaware and departed back for Cairo on the eleventh. I am telling you that when that plane left, okay, those people were mysteriously missing from that plane. Okay? What's going on here? Why are Egyptian military subcontractors what are Egyptian military subcontractors doing in the middle of Provo, Utah on the day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated? Okay? You again, I am saying as a fact, Kash Patel, please feel free to dispute this. In fact, I I almost demand that you dispute it. Think you must. You've been saying everybody's conspiracy these conspiracies are dangerous. Thinking is dangerous. That aircraft was not in Utah for any routine servicing. Okay? Rather, extraordinarily, this person told me that it was there on some discreet mission. So discreet that this individual was scared for their life to present this information, but felt compelled to present it because they too were horrified like the rest of the world. Again, the mistake that was made here was executing him publicly. People felt something. Right? They felt something. They they they understood that whatever happened here was a tremendous act of evil. And so what it led to was goodness. More goodness. More people standing up and doing something brave and saying, we need to root out this evil from our society.
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:49 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If anyone is interested in looking into Andrew Kolvets connection to Johnnie Moore, Joel Rosenberg, and the Egyptian flight. There might be some interesting information. I’ll post screenshots and links below. https://t.co/o6Wi7cFaV4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses potential connections between Andrew Cobalt and Egypt, prompted by a subscriber’s tip related to Candace. The subscriber suggests there may be links worth Candace’s attention and promises screenshots and links below in the comments for others to investigate. The speaker references an article headlined “Egypt's president Sisi meets with US evangelical leaders for the first time in Cairo,” and reads a few key points from it, noting the quote is by Baptist pastor Turk Perkins. The article states that Turk Perkins was joined by evangelical activists and authors described as religious freedom activists and informal Trump adviser Johnny Moore, evangelical Joel Rosenberg, Egyptian-born Christian pastor and author Michael Youssef, and former Republican presidential candidate and former US congressman Michael Betzman. The speaker highlights Johnny Moore as the Trump adviser mentioned in the article and then shifts to the Kairos company. Kairos is described as being founded by Johnny Moore around 2015 as a boutique strategic communication PR firm. The discussion then moves to LinkedIn information about Andrew Kovolt (spelled Kovolt in the transcript), who is said to have been the vice president of communications for “the Cairo company” from August 2015, which would be near the company’s inception, until January 2019 when he allegedly moved to Turning Point. The speaker explicitly states he is not accusing Andrew Colvold (spelled Kovolt) of anything and that he is simply presenting information for others to consider. He adds that he does not know if the information is true or fact-checked, and emphasizes a general caveat: “Everybody's always innocent until proven guilty. Nothing here is a fact. This is all just allegedly.” The caller invites viewers to research further and share any connections they uncover between the Egyptian meeting, the Egyptian companies, and a scenario described as “an Egyptian plane flying with military contractors and kinda trailing Charlie Kirk all over the country and just happened to be in the same state at the same time and the same day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated.” The speaker requests comments with findings and suggests reaching out if anything bigger is discovered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you remember how Candace wanted help looking into that Egyptian flight and there were some really weird things going on? Well, what if I told you there might be some connections between Andrew Cobalt and Egypt? Now this was all sent to me by one of my subscribers, and she's like, hey. You gotta get this on Candace's radar. There's a bunch of connections here. You might wanna dig a little bit deeper. So I'm just gonna kinda share you a little bits and pieces of this. I'm gonna leave links and screenshots to everything down below in the comments. And if you guys wanna dig in and see if you can connect some dots, by all means, dive in. So this letter, this, article was published over here, and it says Egypt's president Sisi meets with US evangelical leaders for the first time in Cairo. Now let me read what that says. Let me just read a few key pieces, and I'm gonna show you a few of these screenshots, and I'm gonna let you guys dig in. I don't have time to right now. So it goes on to say a quote. I won't bore you with it, but the quote was by Baptist pastor Torrey Perkins. Now it says, Turk Perkins was also joined by prominent evangelical activists and authors such as religious freedom activists and informal Trump adviser, Johnny Moore, evangelical Joel Rosenberg, Egyptian born Christian pastor and author, Michael Youssef, and former Republican president candidate, and former US congressman, Michael Betzman. Okay? Now let me show you these screenshots. So in that article, the first name I want you to pay attention to is Johnny Moore. That was the Trump adviser. Right? Okay. So now we're gonna talk about the Kairos company, which was founded by Johnny Moore around 2015 as a boutique strategic communication PR firm. Okay. So now if we swing over to LinkedIn and we check out Andrew Kovolt, he was the vice president of communications for none other than the Cairo company from August 2015 which would have been pretty damn close to its inception until January 2019 when he then what? Switched over to working with Turning Point. Odd how that happens, isn't it? Now I'm not accusing Andrew Colvold of anything. I am just putting this information out there. I don't even know if it's true. I don't know if a fact checks out. I just wanted to put it on your guys' radar. Everybody's always innocent until proven guilty. Nothing here is a fact. This is all just allegedly. Do your own research, and let me know what you guys think. Let me know if you guys think there are any ties here to this Egyptian meeting, these Egyptian companies, and then magically an Egyptian plane flying with military contractors and kinda trailing Charlie Kirk all over the country and just happened to be in the same state at the same time and the same day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated? Drop those comments below. Let me know what you think. Do some research. Hit me up if you guys find anything bigger. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

According to Brian Ference, alleged allegations involving Tyler Bowyer being involved in sexual assault coverups, embezzlement, and bribery have led to the Ingram Family and Family Trust haunting longtime donations to TPUSA until the organization orders the doge style audit of the company’s finances.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A deep-dive connects a pattern of alleged misbehavior by Tyler Boyer and ties it to Turning Point Action and TPUSA. The discussion references a 2015 vote of no confidence concerning Boyer’s use of GOP county funds. The claim is that Boyer was accused of misusing MCRC funds, that “MCRC funds are not a personal account to be used without discretion or discipline,” and that he displayed “ongoing unethical financial behavior,” including “misuse of funds through repeated use of the MCRC debit card without receipts,” and that he “abused MCRC funds and violated federal election law,” with “blatant dishonesty in both internal and external communications as to amounts of funds and budget,” showing “chronic duplicity and deceptiveness in word and deed.” The resolution allegedly stated Boyer had been untruthful and duplicitous in communications and violated FEC filings and Arizona election laws on multiple occasions. It called for an immediate independent audit of the EGC’s financial records and offices and demanded Boyer cease and desist using the MCRC debit card and relinquish all MCRC credit or debit cards and physical checks in his possession. The vote of no confidence was described as deadlocked, but Boyer cast the deciding vote to defeat the resolution. A former board member alleged Boyer embezzled an inflated fundraising by $50,000. Excerpts of the vote and related reporting from 2015 are cited, noting that Boyer was “unfit to lead the party.” TPUSA did not respond to public requests for comment. The narrative then portrays Boyer as “the king of shady” and accuses him of being “directly responsible for all of the corruption” in TPUSA, while claiming he conflates issues and plays the victim. It references Candace Owens calling out TPUSA and Tyler Boyer on her show, with a clip claiming Boyer lied about a police directive to remove cameras. A former video is described, in which a person recounts seeing Charlie get shot and notes the camera operator was connected to Boyer. The thread supposedly includes Candace Owens describing Boyer as “the king of shady” and asserting Turning Point USA is a Mormon organization. The material contrasts Bean-like claims of organizational misrepresentation with statements that TPUSA donors halted long-time donations after concerns about Charlie Kirk’s leadership and calls for audits of the organization and suborganizations’ finances and culture. Additional allegations are referenced about Boyer’s involvement in Maricopa County politics, including alleged embezzlement concerns and relationships with young male interns or workers. It is claimed that Boyer is connected to various power placements at Turning Point USA and that he is fluent in Russian, with a note about UVU and Soviet studies, implying ties to a broader network. The output ends with a disclaimer that “everything stated in this video is allegedly” and that “these are no facts,” followed by a reminder that “these are my opinion” and that “everybody’s always innocent until proven guilty.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So remember what we were saying we couldn't quite put our finger on it with that Tyler Boyer character, but something really was shady going on behind the scenes at Turning Point with the underage or, I mean, the of age younger boys and allegedly, and some of the money laundering operations allegedly. Well, Brian Farrance has done an extensive deep dive and connected a lot of dots, and you guys are gonna wanna hear this. Speaker 1: Breaking Tyler Boyer, 2015. Vote of no confidence reveals allegations of misuse of funds I've written extensively about the pattern of lying and corruption from Superfeed Technologies CEO and Turning Point Action CEO Tyler Boyer. In an exclusive interview with a former board member who served with Tyler Boyer when he was the Maricopa County Republican chairman in 2015, Boyer, who was also an employee of TP USA at the time, was accused of misusing GOP County funds in a vote of no confidence, including alleging MCRC funds are not a personal account to be used without discretion or discipline, and that Boyer displayed ongoing unethical financial behavior, violating the bylaws with misuse of funds through repeated use of the MCRC debit card without receipts, and abused MCRC funds and violated federal election law, and exhibited blatant dishonesty in both internal and external communications as to amounts of funds and budget, and demonstrated chronic duplicity and deceptiveness in word and deed. The resolution went on to say that Boyer has been untruthful and duplicitous in his communications and violated FEC filing in Arizona election laws on multiple occasions. It called for an immediate independent audit of the EGC of both financial records and physical offices and demanded chairman Tyler Boyer immediately cease and desist using the MCRC debit card and relinquish any and all MCRC credit, debit cards, or physical checks in his possession. The vote of no confidence was deadlocked, but instead of recusing himself, Boyer cast the deciding vote to defeat the resolution. Along with the board member corroboration, a twenty fifteen article notes Maricopa County Chairman Tyler Boyer proves once again that he is unfit to lead the party, and references the resolution of no confidence. One former board member who spoke on the condition of anonymity alleged that Boyer had embezzled an inflated fundraising by $50,000. See excerpts of the vote of no confidence below as always. Tyler Boyer and Tyler Boyer and TPUSA, TTUSA does not respond to public request for comment. Woah. Speaker 0: That ain't sounding good for your boy Tyler Boyer. But it goes on to say so he says Tyler Boyer is one of the most dishonest gaslighting grifters directly responsible for all of the corruption in t p u s and is trying to conflate multiple issues and people while playing the victim. He is sweating bullets, and everyone is onto him. Magna conservatives, Christians have valid questions about Tyler Boiler's evil behavior. So in the next thread, he goes on to say, Candace Owens calls out TP USA and TP Action CEO Tyler Boiler on her show saying, I knew Tyler Boiler was lying when he tweeted this guy was commanded by the police to take down the cameras. Check out this clip. Speaker 2: I I actually don't know why this video I don't know what this video could have done if he sent me other than to make me feel even more uncomfortable. Because the video he sent me is quite shocking. It's also the reason that I knew that Tyler Boyer was lying when he tweeted that This guy was commanded by the police to take down the cameras. He's lying because I have every minute of what this guy was doing thanks to him having sent it to me. Every minute of what he was doing before he took those cameras down and there are only four minutes by way before he takes those cameras down. So he's next to and he's in front of Mikey McCoy when Charlie got shot. Now to his credit, he actually did see Charlie get shot. He saw in like a split second sees Charlie bleeding and runs and doesn't run very far. He just runs a couple of yards away. I should mention that the camera guy, he too was also brought into the company by Tyler Boyer. Okay. Speaker 0: And then in this last thread, he shares his video of Candace where he says breaking. Candace Owens on her Halloween show says Tyler Boyer is the king of shady and jokes if you think t TP USA is a Christian organization, so you'd be surprised. It's a Mormon organization. Check this out. Speaker 2: I had with Tyler Boyer. Tyler Boyer is the king of shady at Turning Point USA. He is the one, like I said, has he has hired every person around Charlie. Joke's on you if you think Turning Point USA is a Christian organization. It's a Mormon one. Okay? Speaker 0: And trust me. There's definitely not a story anywhere out there about Tyler Boyer, including evidence of sexual assaults, cover ups, embezzlement, and bribery. And I'm sure this wouldn't lead to a bunch of TPUS mega donors pulling back their long standing donations. Right? Speaker 1: After the Ingram family and the Family Trust announced plans to halt long time TP USA donations until Charlie Kirk's ordered doge audit of the organization and suborganization's finances and culture change moves forward in allegations of corruption and leadership and about Charlie Kirk's assassination are addressed, Dozens of other donors came forward saying they have the same concerns and are also halting their donations. See comments and thread. This was met with immediate harassment by Turning Point Shills, similar to the recent Halloween scandal where TP USA spokesman Andrew Colvet spread lies about Tucson teachers' costumes and later walked back the propaganda after teachers were doxxed, threatened, and talk of defamation lawsuits against TP USA began to spread. This follows COVID's man of steel bone scandal and corruption allegations surrounding TP USA Tyler Bowyer, including evidence of sexual assault cover up, embezzlement, and bribery. Speaker 0: And just in case you want me to circle back and drive that home, check out this full clip of Candace breaking down this story on our show last week. Check this out. Speaker 2: So another person who wrote us was telling me the story about Tyler Boyer's involvement in, like, Maricopa County politics in general. Like, what did he do before in Arizona? And, yeah, it's just the kind of stories that he said he approached him several times about embezzlement. You know, char not Charlie. Tyler was hooking up with young interns, young male interns, or young male workers, and he didn't even care. He's like, I would go on record because all of this happened, and I had the proof that all of this happened. And I everybody knows about Tyler Boyer at Turning Point USA. It's like an absurdity. But this is the person that is putting people into places of power at Turning Point USA. Like, he's he's just involved. And something that was interesting is also how many Russian speakers there are. I was telling you, like, UVU, there's just a lot of Russians and people who study Soviet studies. Even the president of UVU majored majored in Soviet studies, Tyler Boyer, majored in Soviet studies. He's a fluent Russian speaker. He spent years. And I'm gonna assume when I say they speak Russian, that they're probably more tied to Ukraine, like, kind of coming full circle on that. Because a lot of times people wrongly assume that people who speak Russian are Russian. And, actually, Ukrainians, until they, like, made it a law, they had to stop speaking Russian quite recently, were Russian speakers. Right? Speaker 0: And just so you always know, everything stated in this video is allegedly. This is just my opinion. These are no facts. Everything is speculation. Everybody's always innocent until proven guilty, especially Tyler Boyer. He's definitely not a pedo, not a creep, not a weirdo, not a money launder or grifter or any of those things. That's just my opinion.
Saved - November 9, 2025 at 11:48 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The Canadian government slaughtered 300 perfectly healthy Ostriches after scientists discovered Ostrich eggs have magical antibodies capable of curing an unknown numbers of life ending illnesses. Reports claim it was like watching a real life episode of black mirrors. https://t.co/8M49hyVrjs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a situation where the Canadian government reportedly went onto a private property and rounded up 300 ostriches, killing them. He claims the birds lived mostly under 30 years old and that they slaughtered them for no reason, labeling them dangerous. He asserts the danger lies in their eggs and the antibodies in the eggs, noting that research began when it was realized ostrich eggs could literally cure coronavirus and that a family offered their ostriches for study, hoping the eggs could help humanity. He states the eggs were found to be powerful, capable of curing cancer and tumors, challenging big pharma profits, and suggests there is deliberate obstruction to prevent enough research or widespread cure discovery so people remain reliant on big pharma. Speaker 1 counters by saying the birds are healthy and that their eggs hold a cure for children and grandparents, claiming the birds are being shot slowly and suffering. He asserts the birds are not killed by gunshot to the head but shot on rails, causing slow death, and he implies this is happening to push people to order ostrich eggs. Speaker 0 continues by alleging a broader conspiracy, saying the ostriches were intended to go extinct along with values people hold dear, and complains about foreign government influence, specifically blaming Israel for alleged domination. He asserts that Israel is the root cause of evil globally and claims Israel has no allegiance to any country, arriving, exploiting hosts, feigning victimhood, and draining resources like a parasite. He argues that in the world, only China, Russia, and Iran have stood up against Western manipulation, claiming they ban U.S. citizens from traveling to their countries without permits or a certified tour guide, and that these countries restrict foreign influence and control their governance. Speaker 0 elaborates that in the United States, foreigners are allowed to come and influence politics, leading to the current subordinate treatment of Americans. He references President Trump as once seen as a savior but now claims Trump is working for “them” and taking away freedoms, asserting he is the antichrist due to actions after the public mandate and multiple terms. He states the Canadian government would not have acted this way under Trump, and asserts that Trump would have prevented such actions. He ends by telling the audience to leave Canada, move their wealth to a country like El Salvador, and offers a blessing to the audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sure everybody's been telling you about the 300 ostriches that the Canadian government literally went on to this lady's private property, rounded up all of her ostriches. These things lived at 75 years old. Most were under the age of 30, and they executed them. They slaughtered them for no reason because the government said that they're dangerous. They're bad. Well, the only danger they have is their eggs and the antibodies that their eggs provide. Basically, we don't really know. We just started doing research when they realized that it could literally cure the coronavirus, and this family was came forward. It like, hey. We got all these ostriches. Like, yeah. Let's let's use these eggs. Let's study this. Let's see what these these ostriches can cure thinking it's gonna be a gift to humanity. And they come to find out exactly how powerful these ostrich eggs were and exactly what they could do. Basically, curing cancer, tumors, all of the things that big pharma profit from. They wanna make sure that there's never enough of them to do enough research so that that way you guys could really realize how you guys can cure yourselves without going to get big pharma. Speaker 1: You guys are killing, allowing you're allowing healthy animals. Our birds have a cure. A cure for your kids. A cure for your grandmother. Because my birds are getting shot slowly and dying. They're suffering. They're not getting shot in the head. They're not doing any amazing. And they're sitting up on rails and shooting my birds. Time you hear the birds slowly. You Speaker 0: could order some ostrich eggs. Well, they wanted to make sure that we're gonna make these ostriches go extinct along with anything that you hold near and dear. And this is what happens when you allow foreign governments like Israel to take over your country. You think America is the only Western country that Israel's taken over? You're out of your gosh damn mind. You think the cartels reign supreme in Mexico and Israel doesn't have a role in it? Israel controls it all, guys. They are the root cause of all evil around the entire world, and they will be until they no longer in power. And if the West falls, which is their real goal, Israel's not aligned to anybody. They don't have a home. Right? They don't have an allegiance to any specific country or entity. They come to a country, they live off the host, they claim the victim, and they suck us dry like a fucking parasite that they really are. And this is the aftermath of it. It doesn't matter where you look, doesn't matter what government you're talking about outside of China, outside of Iran, outside of Russia, those are the only three countries that have really stood up and said, no. We're not doing this. We're not playing these games here. We are going to be a nation of Chinese. We're gonna be a nation of Russians. We're gonna be a nation of Iranians, and we're not gonna play your games. You know what? We're actually gonna ban The United States citizens from traveling to our country without a permit, without an escort. Right? You can't go to Iran right now if you're an American citizen with just a USA passport unless you're gonna go and have a tour guide with you at all times, somebody that's appointed by their government, a certified tour guide. Russia, they're never gonna let anybody that's not Russian run their government. China, no way. Right? But here in America, yeah, we'll let foreign foreigners come over here and take over our country. They'll buy off our politicians. They'll blackmail our politicians. Then we, the American people, just get shit on. President Trump was supposed to be your lord and savior. I thought that too. Well, he's not to save any of us. He's actually working for them to take away all of our freedoms. He's pretty much the antichrist. When you have the ability to do that much good and you choose to do that much bad after the mandate that the American people gave you, after we brought you back for a third term, and you're gonna treat us like that? Well, obviously, nobody respects Trump. The Canadian government doesn't give a shit. If they did, they would have never pulled some shit like this. Trump 2016 would have never let this happen. Trump 2020, 2024, he ain't saying shit. He ain't gonna give a shit. Y'all cooked in Canada. You should get out while you can. You should get your wealth and get your money and get yourself out of that country and get to a country like El Salvador as fast as humanly possible. God bless you guys.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

This is the number one reason why I believe that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a professional hit squad. https://t.co/ZiVFJZ4heU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 posits a theory that there were state actors or foreign intelligence agencies involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and attributes this belief to Benny Johnson, describing Johnson as “the anarchist” who told him so, and invites viewers to “check this clip out.” Speaker 1 responds by acknowledging that there is reason for people to believe this could be a professional hit job. They reference John Salmond as an excellent reporter and Steven Crowder as having access to leaked information. They state, “there is some considerable evidence that there were state actors involved here,” and emphasize their close connection to Charlie Kirk and his team, asserting that this is what they wish to relay to the audience. Speaker 0 returns to challenge Benny, asking which specific element changed his mind and led him to conclude that Tyler Robinson is now not a lone actor, and that state-level or foreign intelligence agencies were not involved in the assassination. He enumerates several potential clues: a text message from Lance Twiggs, similarities between Tyler Robinson’s photo and the jail mugshot, the speed at which Tyler Robinson was able to sprint, and the “man of steel” autopsy claim that Charlie Kirk stopped a 30-06 with his neck. He then asks which of these factors was decisive in shifting Benny’s belief away from the involvement of state actors, and expresses intent to wait for Benny’s answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna know the number one reason why I think that there were state actors involved or foreign intelligence agencies involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Maybe it's because Benny Johnson, the anarchist, is the one who told me so. Check this clip out. Speaker 1: Yes. There's reason for people to believe that this is a professional hit job. John Salmon is an excellent reporter, and Steven Crowder has some leaked information. I want to talk about both. I want to begin by saying that I'm very, very close with Charlie and his team, and here is the thing that I here's what I wish to relay to you from that, that there is some considerable evidence that there were state actors involved here. That's it. Speaker 0: What changed, Benny? Was it the text message from Lance Twiggs? Was it the similarities between Tyler Robinson's photo and the actual mugshot of Tyler Robinson in the jail cell, or was it the fact of how fast Tyler Robinson was able to get into that sprint, or was it the man of steel autopsy where Charlie Kirk stopped a 30 out six with his neck? Which one of those was it that led you to believe that Tyler Robinson is now magically this lone actor and there was no state level or foreign intelligence agencies involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk? I'll be waiting.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Yes, I honestly believe that they are behind every demonic force that is trying to destroy western civilization. https://t.co/IT1rIiuWWU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion opens with Speaker 0 criticizing the idea of Judeo-Christian values and contrasting Judaism with Christianity. He references a tweet by Daniel h about rabbi Solomon Friedman purchasing the world’s largest pornography company and argues that the rabbi’s goal is to legitimize pornography and erase taboos so it can spread, linking this to his own demonetization on YouTube, loss of TikTok accounts, bans on LinkedIn and Instagram, and suspensions on Twitter. He asserts that despite his losses, “people like this evil sick bastard get platform” and use that platform to fund APAC, which allegedly uses money to buy politicians, rig elections, and restrict Americans’ rights, to force “this trash on our children.” Speaker 1 (the interviewer) asks why, among many businesses, they targeted buying Pornhub. Speaker 2 (the interviewee) explains the motive: they saw an extraordinary opportunity in a space that has not received mainstream investment. He notes that porn is legal and constitutionally protected in Western democracies, but it lacks legitimacy. He says that nobody wanted to be openly associated with owning a major adult company; many wanted the benefits without public engagement with other tech, government, or regulation. They viewed an arbitrage opportunity to bring the industry into the twenty-first century by owning Pornhub and the broader company, engaging with law enforcement, regulation, and mainstream tech, finance, and legal networks. Speaker 3 replays a Candace-style clip about “they,” discussing the use and meaning of the word they. They debate whether “they” implies Jews, with Speaker 3 arguing that “they” can refer to anyone and criticizing the tactic as a fear-inducing way to stifle speech. They explain that if they mean Jews, they will say Jews, and if they mean Israel, they will say Israel; they distinguish discussing Jews, Zionists, or Israel from broader groups. Speaker 1 asks for clarification, and Speaker 3 asserts a long-standing trope about “they” and confirms the discomfort with the idea that saying “they” automatically targets Jews, insisting they will name Jews or Zionists when those are the subjects. Speaker 0 concludes by reiterating the usage: when they say “they” own the media, control politicians, and influence Pornhub and OnlyFans, they are referring to “they,” specifically noting that “they will be the downfall of our civilization if we, the American people, don’t wake up.” He states that “you know exactly who we are talking about when we say they.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you hear people like me say that there's no such thing as Judea Christian values, when you talk about Judaism and what their beliefs are versus what Christianity is and they don't align, let me explain to you why. So our buddy over here, Daniel h, he put out this tweet. He says, rabbi Solomon Friedman explains why he purchased the world's largest pornography company in the world. He says, the rabbi explains how his goal is to legitimize pornography in society and eliminate the taboo so it can spread far as possible. This is why you have people like myself that are so upset. Right? I've been demonetized on three YouTube channels. I've lost 12 TikTok accounts. I'm permanently banned on LinkedIn. I've lost three Instagrams and on my third Twitter account. And you mean to tell me that I'm the bad guy? Yet people like this evil sick bastard get platform. And not only do they get platformed, they take that money, they use that money to fund APAC, and then APAC uses that money to buy our politicians, and then they use that to rig our elections and take away our freedoms as American citizens. They wanna take away your ability to speak and defend this demonic evil so that they can force this trash on our children. Speaker 1: Out of all the businesses you guys could buy, why did you guys target buying Pornhub? Speaker 2: Yeah. So we saw an extraordinary opportunity. You know, the fact that we're it's it's note it's newsworthy or noteworthy that we've made the acquisition. That should tell you that this is a space that has not had mainstream investment. Right? That it's a space I always said, you know, when we looked at the business, it's a business that's legal. Not only is it legal, but in every Western democracy, it's constitutionally protected. It it could not be outlawed even if you wanted to, but it doesn't have that legitimacy. And one of the reasons for that, and as we start to examine the business further, was that nobody wanted to say we are the owners of a major adult company. Right? Everyone they sort of they wanted the benefits of owning a major adult company. It's a profitable business, but nobody wanted to be out front and engaging with other tech businesses, with government, with law enforcement, with regulation in that sort of way that the modern tech industry has to. So we saw in that this arbitrage opportunity, right, where if people who come from, you know, the mainstream professional networks, whether it's law, law enforcement, tech, finance, etcetera, this is an opportunity to really bring this industry into the twenty first century. We saw an extraordinary opportunity to do that with this, you know, this jewel of an asset, Pornhub, but obviously with the entire company. Speaker 1: I love it. Said jewel of an asset. Speaker 0: So now I wanna play this clip from Candace where she talks about they. Speaker 3: They is a word. So, like, I don't need to always, like, say they. Like, it's just it's just a weird it's like this is one of these psychology tactics where you're like, who is they? Who is they? And it's like Speaker 1: because it sounds like you're saying Jews. Speaker 3: Does the word they mean Jews? Speaker 1: When you're talking about Jews, yes. Speaker 3: But if I'm not talking about Jews then they doesn't mean Jews. When I say they want us to believe this or they want us to believe that and you hear Jews, that's your own derangement, Right? If I wanna say something about Jews, I'll say it. If I wanna say something about Israel, I will say it. If I wanna just like when I wanna say something about black people, I'll say it. When I was saying during BLM, they want us to believe nobody said, do you mean Jews? And so, again, it's one of these trash tactics to make people fearful to speak. If I wanna say Jews, I will say Jews. I don't fear saying Jews. When I say Zionists run the media, I mean Zionists run the media. People that support the political ideology of Israel run the media. Any other things that I Speaker 1: can help clarify? But are you familiar with this, like, very long standing Speaker 3: trope that shit about a trope? Speaker 0: Oh, yes. When we talk about they and say we say they own the media and they control our politicians and they control Pornhub and they control OnlyFans and they are responsible for the degradation of our civilization. And, yes, they will be the downfall of our civilization if we, the American people, don't wake up and get our heads out of their ass. You know exactly who we are talking about when we say they.
Saved - November 4, 2025 at 10:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Brian Ference alleges Tyler Bowyer is tied to sexual assault coverups, embezzlement, and bribery, pushing for a doge-style audit of TPUSA finances, with a referenced dig into Charlie Kirk’s scene. I also note LD15’s Jake Hoffman TPUSA fiefdom reportedly canceled all summer, September, November, and December meetings; Kimberly Hoffman is listed as 1st Vice Chair, amid questions of corruption and TPUSA ties.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

According to Brian Ference, alleged allegations involving Tyler Bowyer being involved in sexual assault coverups, embezzlement, and bribery have led to the Ingram Family and Family Trust haunting longtime donations to TPUSA until the organization orders the doge style audit of the company’s finances.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines concerns about Tyler Boyer, alleging shady activities behind the scenes at Turning Point with underage or of-age younger boys and money laundering operations, and notes Brian Farrance’s extensive deep dive connecting dots. Speaker 1 presents a 2015 vote of no confidence involving Boyer and alleges misuse of GOP County funds. The account claims MCRC funds were not a personal account to be used without discretion or discipline, with ongoing unethical financial behavior, including repeated use of the MCRC debit card without receipts, and abuse of MCRC funds and violation of federal election law. It asserts Boyer exhibited blatant dishonesty in internal and external communications about amounts of funds and budget, demonstrated chronic duplicity and deceptiveness, and violated FEC filing and Arizona election laws on multiple occasions. The resolution demanded an immediate independent audit of the EGC’s financial records and offices, and for Boyer to cease and desist using the MCRC debit card and relinquish all MCRC credit/debit cards or checks. The vote of no confidence was deadlocked, but Boyer cast the deciding vote to defeat the resolution. A former board member alleged Boyer embezzled an inflated fundraising by $50,000. Excerpts of the vote are cited, and a 2015 article notes Boyer “proves once again that he is unfit to lead the party.” The speaker asserts TPUSA (Turning Point USA) does not respond to requests for comment. Speaker 0 continues, quoting a thread that labels Boyer as “one of the most dishonest gaslighting grifters,” directly responsible for corruption in TPUSA, and accuses him of conflating issues while playing the victim. It cites Candace Owens calling out Boyer on her show, claiming she knew Boyer was lying when he tweeted that a man was commanded by the police to take down cameras, and urges viewers to check a clip. Speaker 2 references a video in which a participant says the video shows what Boyer was doing before cameras were taken down, including an incident with Charlie getting shot and a camera operator who was hired by Boyer. A subsequent thread alleges Candace Owens on Halloween described Boyer as “the king of shady” and says Turning Point USA is a Mormon organization rather than a Christian one. Speaker 0 adds that there is no story anywhere about Boyer involving sexual assaults, cover-ups, embezzlement, or bribery, and notes donors halted long-time TPUSA donations after the Ingram family and Family Trust demanded a governance and audit response, with others echoing concerns. It mentions harassment by Turning Point shills and references to past scandals (Halloween, COVID) and allegations including sexual assault cover-ups, embezzlement, and bribery. Speaker 1 notes that after donors halted contributions, more donors joined the concerns, and that this was followed by harassment of TPUSA and spread of propaganda, with mentions of doxxing and defamation threats. The clip ends with Candace breaking down the story on the show last week. Speaker 2 concludes by recounting further alleged details about Boyer’s involvement in Maricopa County politics, including embezzlement accusations, his alleged pattern of hiring people around Charlie, and claims about Boyer’s background. It also mentions Tyler Boyer’s education—majoring in Soviet studies—and his fluency in Russian, implying ties to Ukrainian communities and challenging assumptions about Russian speakers. The transcript ends with a disclaimer that everything stated is alleged, an opinion, not facts, and that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, explicitly applying this to Tyler Boyer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So remember what we were saying we couldn't quite put our finger on it with that Tyler Boyer character, but something really was shady going on behind the scenes at Turning Point with the underage or, I mean, the of age younger boys and allegedly, and some of the money laundering operations allegedly. Well, Brian Farrance has done an extensive deep dive and connected a lot of dots, and you guys are gonna wanna hear this. Speaker 1: Breaking Tyler Boyer, 2015. Vote of no confidence reveals allegations of misuse of funds I've written extensively about the pattern of lying and corruption from Superfeed Technologies CEO and Turning Point Action CEO Tyler Boyer. In an exclusive interview with a former board member who served with Tyler Boyer when he was the Maricopa County Republican chairman in 2015, Boyer, who was also an employee of TP USA at the time, was accused of misusing GOP County funds in a vote of no confidence, including alleging MCRC funds are not a personal account to be used without discretion or discipline, and that Boyer displayed ongoing unethical financial behavior, violating the bylaws with misuse of funds through repeated use of the MCRC debit card without receipts, and abused MCRC funds and violated federal election law, and exhibited blatant dishonesty in both internal and external communications as to amounts of funds and budget, and demonstrated chronic duplicity and deceptiveness in word and deed. The resolution went on to say that Boyer has been untruthful and duplicitous in his communications and violated FEC filing in Arizona election laws on multiple occasions. It called for an immediate independent audit of the EGC of both financial records and physical offices and demanded chairman Tyler Boyer immediately cease and desist using the MCRC debit card and relinquish any and all MCRC credit, debit cards, or physical checks in his possession. The vote of no confidence was deadlocked, but instead of recusing himself, Boyer cast the deciding vote to defeat the resolution. Along with the board member corroboration, a twenty fifteen article notes Maricopa County Chairman Tyler Boyer proves once again that he is unfit to lead the party, and references the resolution of no confidence. One former board member who spoke on the condition of anonymity alleged that Boyer had embezzled an inflated fundraising by $50,000. See excerpts of the vote of no confidence below as always. Tyler Boyer and Tyler Boyer and TPUSA, TTUSA does not respond to public request for comment. Woah. Speaker 0: That ain't sounding good for your boy Tyler Boyer. But it goes on to say so he says Tyler Boyer is one of the most dishonest gaslighting grifters directly responsible for all of the corruption in t p u s and is trying to conflate multiple issues and people while playing the victim. He is sweating bullets, and everyone is onto him. Magna conservatives, Christians have valid questions about Tyler Boiler's evil behavior. So in the next thread, he goes on to say, Candace Owens calls out TP USA and TP Action CEO Tyler Boiler on her show saying, I knew Tyler Boiler was lying when he tweeted this guy was commanded by the police to take down the cameras. Check out this clip. Speaker 2: I I actually don't know why this video I don't know what this video could have done if he sent me other than to make me feel even more uncomfortable. Because the video he sent me is quite shocking. It's also the reason that I knew that Tyler Boyer was lying when he tweeted that This guy was commanded by the police to take down the cameras. He's lying because I have every minute of what this guy was doing thanks to him having sent it to me. Every minute of what he was doing before he took those cameras down and there are only four minutes by way before he takes those cameras down. So he's next to and he's in front of Mikey McCoy when Charlie got shot. Now to his credit, he actually did see Charlie get shot. He saw in like a split second sees Charlie bleeding and runs and doesn't run very far. He just runs a couple of yards away. I should mention that the camera guy, he too was also brought into the company by Tyler Boyer. Okay. Speaker 0: And then in this last thread, he shares his video of Candace where he says breaking. Candace Owens on her Halloween show says Tyler Boyer is the king of shady and jokes if you think t TP USA is a Christian organization, so you'd be surprised. It's a Mormon organization. Check this out. Speaker 2: I had with Tyler Boyer. Tyler Boyer is the king of shady at Turning Point USA. He is the one, like I said, has he has hired every person around Charlie. Joke's on you if you think Turning Point USA is a Christian organization. It's a Mormon one. Okay? Speaker 0: And trust me. There's definitely not a story anywhere out there about Tyler Boyer, including evidence of sexual assaults, cover ups, embezzlement, and bribery. And I'm sure this wouldn't lead to a bunch of TPUS mega donors pulling back their long standing donations. Right? Speaker 1: After the Ingram family and the Family Trust announced plans to halt long time TP USA donations until Charlie Kirk's ordered doge audit of the organization and suborganization's finances and culture change moves forward in allegations of corruption and leadership and about Charlie Kirk's assassination are addressed, Dozens of other donors came forward saying they have the same concerns and are also halting their donations. See comments and thread. This was met with immediate harassment by Turning Point Shills, similar to the recent Halloween scandal where TP USA spokesman Andrew Colvet spread lies about Tucson teachers' costumes and later walked back the propaganda after teachers were doxxed, threatened, and talk of defamation lawsuits against TP USA began to spread. This follows COVID's man of steel bone scandal and corruption allegations surrounding TP USA Tyler Bowyer, including evidence of sexual assault cover up, embezzlement, and bribery. Speaker 0: And just in case you want me to circle back and drive that home, check out this full clip of Candace breaking down this story on our show last week. Check this out. Speaker 2: So another person who wrote us was telling me the story about Tyler Boyer's involvement in, like, Maricopa County politics in general. Like, what did he do before in Arizona? And, yeah, it's just the kind of stories that he said he approached him several times about embezzlement. You know, char not Charlie. Tyler was hooking up with young interns, young male interns, or young male workers, and he didn't even care. He's like, I would go on record because all of this happened, and I had the proof that all of this happened. And I everybody knows about Tyler Boyer at Turning Point USA. It's like an absurdity. But this is the person that is putting people into places of power at Turning Point USA. Like, he's he's just involved. And something that was interesting is also how many Russian speakers there are. I was telling you, like, UVU, there's just a lot of Russians and people who study Soviet studies. Even the president of UVU majored majored in Soviet studies, Tyler Boyer, majored in Soviet studies. He's a fluent Russian speaker. He spent years. And I'm gonna assume when I say they speak Russian, that they're probably more tied to Ukraine, like, kind of coming full circle on that. Because a lot of times people wrongly assume that people who speak Russian are Russian. And, actually, Ukrainians, until they, like, made it a law, they had to stop speaking Russian quite recently, were Russian speakers. Right? Speaker 0: And just so you always know, everything stated in this video is allegedly. This is just my opinion. These are no facts. Everything is speculation. Everybody's always innocent until proven guilty, especially Tyler Boyer. He's definitely not a pedo, not a creep, not a weirdo, not a money launder or grifter or any of those things. That's just my opinion.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Diligent went back to the Charlie Kirk crime scene to do a replay on how Terryl Farnsworty reacted moments after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. You gotta see this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references a person who was removing memory cards from cameras about four minutes after what is described as the Charlie Kirk assassination, noting that something about the situation didn’t sit right. They mention Candace released a video showing how this person reacted, and that diligent investigation followed, including a campus visit to UVU to examine the events with a play-by-play analysis. The speaker says they will leave a link to that video but first shows a clip. In the clip, Speaker 1 describes the sequence: “He doesn't try to grab Charlie. He doesn't duck. His first reaction standing right here is to turn this way and start booking.” The person “starts booking back here,” and Speaker 1 notes that he sees the shot and that Charlie hasn’t even hit the ground yet. Charlie is described as being in a position where “Charlie’s like this,” and the person pivots to lean back. Security personnel respond by coming over, grabbing him, and pulling him to the ground. Meanwhile, Terrell Farnsworth “has already turned and begun running back here to climb up on that wall.” The speaker asks the audience to imagine there had just been a shooting, with chaos and people running. Charlie Kirk “was just shot,” and the wall is described as “almost as tall as I am.” The speaker asks the audience if they can see, confirming visibility. The analysis then focuses on the person’s actions: measuring “how much of a pain in the ass he climbed up right here and then threw that loose rock and just so he could get to his vantage point.” The speaker calls it out as an attempt to explain the sequence from the vantage point up the wall. The clip continues with the person producing a selfie video: “Oh, they shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie.” They refer to him as “Agent” and note his statements like “They shot Charlie. God help him.” The speaker says this behavior is a major red flag and cites it as the most troubling aspect. The running scene is described further: as the person runs out, he looks to his left and, in the footage, is seen climbing up, then reacting to the news that Charlie was shot. The voiceover emphasizes the emotional state (or lack thereof) as the footage shows the stampede of people and chaos. The speaker underscores that, to them, the absence of emotion on the person’s face during these events is “the biggest red flag of all.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you guys remember the dude that was removing the memory cards from the cameras about four minutes after the Charlie Kirk assassination, and things just didn't sit right. And then Candace released a video on how he reacted while diligent. Just went back to UVU campus. He did a little investigation and showed that kinda like a play by play of how this guy reacted. So if you guys haven't seen this video, I'm gonna leave it linked down below, but I'm just gonna show you a little clip of it. I want you guys to check it out. Speaker 1: He doesn't try to grab Charlie. He doesn't duck. K? His first reaction standing right here is to turn this way and start booking. K? He starts booking back here. So he he sees the shot. Charlie hasn't even hit the ground yet. Charlie's like this. He starts to lean back like this. His security guys come over, and they grab him and actually pull him to the ground. K? While that's happening, Terry far Terrell Farnsworth has already turned and begun running back here to climb up on that wall. So I want you to imagine there was just a shooting. K? There was he Charlie Kirk was just shot. There is mayhem. There is chaos. There is people running everywhere. Charlie hasn't even hit the ground yet. He's already running back here. He climbs up that wall. I mean, this wall is almost as tall as I am. Can you see me now? Yeah. We can see you now. Yeah. So I was wanting to measure, k, how much of a pain in the ass he climbed up right here and then threw that loose rock and just so he could get to his vantage point. Right? It's it's, make it make sense. And he does the weirdest selfie video. Oh, they shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. Just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. Agent shot, Charlie. God help him. This bugs me the most about the whole fucking thing. You run out. You look over to your left. Here's what you see. As you're running out. It wasn't easy. He climbs up here. Oh my god. They shot Charlie. Oh my god. They shot Charlie. Oh my god. He's dead. All emotionless, all weird. And then he records the whole thing, the stampede of people, people panicking, running for their lives. No trace of emotion on his face at all. For me, it's like the biggest red flag of all.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

When you are the man covering up the Epstein list and the man covering up the Charlie Kirk assassination, I guess you have the power to fire the company who tracks the FBI’s private jet.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges that Kash Patel, described as the FBI director, used a private jet to visit his girlfriend and “get a piece of ass,” and that he then disabled the tracking on the government jet after being called out by the speaker and Kyle Sarifen. The speaker claims Patel disabled the tracking because people like Kyle Sarifen and the speaker were criticizing him. The speaker notes that Patel cried about the situation, implying it was to make himself feel better, and adds that Kyle Sarifen says the FBI director fired the person in charge of CIRG because the taxpayer-owned jet was traceable by taxpayers. The speaker contrasts this with Patel’s behavior when exposing Chris Ray, stating that Patel “didn’t cry when I was exposing Chris Ray.” The speaker repeats that Patel used his private jet to visit his girlfriend and “cry on her shoulder to make himself feel better.” The speaker emphasizes the idea of hypocrisy and expresses frustration with the state of America, concluding with the statement that “this is the America we live in. It’s fucking cooked.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait. Are you fucking kidding me? So Kash Patel, the FBI director, who's taking his private jet to visit his girlfriend to get a piece of ass, has now disabled the tracking on the government jet because people like Kyle Sarifen and myself are calling his ass out. So now he's he's crying about it. And then to make himself feel better, Kyle says, the FBI director fired the guy in charge of the CIRG because the taxpayer owned jet was traceable by taxpayers. He didn't cry when I was exposing Chris Ray. What a hypocrite. And he literally took his private jet to then go visit his fucking girlfriend and get a piece of ass and cry on her shoulder to make himself feel better. This is the America we live in. It's fucking cooked.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Follow the money and Follow @BrianFerence1 You might be interested in looking into Jake Hoffman. Republican Legislative District 15 AKA The Jake Hoffman TPUSA Fiefdom has reportedly cancelled all summer meetings

@BrianFerence1 - Brian Ference

🚨BREAKING: Republican Legislative District 15 AKA The Jake Hoffman TPUSA Fiefdom has reportedly cancelled all summer meetings, the September meeting, the November meeting, and the December meeting isn't a meeting but a party at Arizona State Senate and "Ad Agency CEO" Jake Hoffman's house according to a Precinct Committeeman in LD15. Cancelling large swaths of PC meetings is an old RINO tactic for suppressing questions and free speech of the people. According to an LD15 PC "PC's are restless as five meetings have been canceled so they don't fell they have representation and they think Jake is controlling the LD." Kimberly Hoffman is listed as the 1st Vice Chair of the Board. Jake Hoffman, who is paid millions of dollars per year by TPUSA and has been TPUSA Tyler Bowyer's "partner in crime" for the last 10 years, was recently embarrassed spreading an orchestrated TPUSA lie about Tucson Teacher's Halloween Costumes. Many have begun to question Hoffman's deep ties to TPUSA, his role in Arizona Elites ordaining who the candidates in Arizona state and federal elections are, as well as other allegations of corruption. The LD15 Events Calendar shows no LD meetings in June, July, August, November, or December: https://ld15gop.com/events/month/

Events for November 2025 – LD 15 GOP Events and Info ld15gop.com

@BrianFerence1 - Brian Ference

Corrupt liar Jake Hoffman has opened himself up to incredible liability and is now doubling down on a lie he already walked back. Hoffman and those tied to TPUSA are demonstrating why they are corrupt to the core and have no place in the conservative, Christian, Republican, or https://t.co/AEbdbJarHE

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:44 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

How much long do you think Elon Musk will allow this to continue? https://t.co/GiunWd8n7X

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a prior incident where almost every tweet from a day was flagged, claiming there is "one specific group of people that you can talk you can't talk bad about" and stating "it's illegal here on X." They caution viewers to avoid saying certain words in the video to prevent account nukes. They reference a post by someone identified as propaganda and co, noting: "you can't deport everyone, including whites, but you just can't deport the Jews." The speaker quotes the post: "deport all whites, deport all Hispanics, deport all blacks, deport all Muslims." They then point out that, "as soon as he said deport all Jews, immediately, visibility limited." The speaker highlights that the post may "violate x rules against hateful conduct." They respond with a defiant stance: "So what? I I can hate on I can hate on blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, whites, but god's chosen people. They're off limits, obviously." The speaker emphasizes their perception of a double standard. The speaker asserts: "Be a good little goyum. Pay your taxes. Keep your mouth shut. Don't speak out against anything that would be considered hateful over here on x because that'll get you nuked." The language conveys a claim that there is selective enforcement and censorship on the platform, with Jews described as uniquely protected and off-limits for criticism, while other groups are portrayed as targets for hateful statements. The overall narrative centers on censorship, perceived hypocrisy, and the idea that certain groups can be criticized while others cannot, according to the speaker's interpretation of platform rules and enforcement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you guys remember last week when all of a sudden my account just basically pretty much just every single tweet from that day just got flagged because I started talking about the people that you can't criticize? Well, try not to even say those words in this video because you never know. There's obviously one specific group of people that you can talk you can't talk bad about. It's illegal here on X. So let me explain this before you get your account nukes. So check this out. Our man propaganda and co says you can't deport everyone, including whites, but you just can't deport the Jews. You can deport everybody, even the whites, but you can't deport the Jews. So he went on here and he says, deport all whites, deport all Hispanics, deport all blacks, deport all Muslims. But then as soon as he said deport all Jews, immediately, visibility limited. This post may violate x rules against hateful conduct. So what? I I can hate on I can hate on blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, whites, but god's chosen people. They're off limits, obviously. So good. Be a good little goyum. Pay your taxes. Keep your mouth shut. Don't speak out against anything that would be considered hateful over here on x because that'll get you nuked.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Breaking news, Jack Posobice just posted another tweet attempting to brainwash you into believing the left was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/fBQ3jSH16k

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges Americans to pay attention and take notes, insisting that “every single person” pushing that “the left assassinated Charlie Kirk” is suspicious and that “something's not right here.” They claim it is “weird” that “alleged closet homosexuals are now putting their wives in their photo to try to, you know, make you not think otherwise,” and state “it's just my opinion” about Charlie Kirk being gay, adding “there's something weird about this dude” and “Mossad vibes all over it,” again noting it as their opinion and not a stated fact. They reference a claim from “Jack Wozobic says, new. Breaking. Breaking. New footage released of the Charlie Kirk aftermath murder,” dismissing it with “Come on, bro. Get out of here.” They vow to “never forget what the left did that day” and assert they “we won't,” while claiming the speaker’s own side is “not gonna forget what you've done every day since,” and that the situation “sure as hell ain't helping your boy, Charlie Kirk.” The speaker calls this moment “pivotal in American history” and expresses daily prayer that “Candace Owens comes with the receipts and the heat to just blow this investigation wide the hell open.” They urge that after the investigation, “project Mockingbird, Mockingbird Media,” and “every one of these scumbags should be investigated,” demanding scrutiny of “every penny, every dollar, where the money came from, where the funding's going, how they got it, who organized it, who helped fundraise for it, who campaigned for it.” They insist “every one of these shows should be mocked,” and claim they should have “no career in media,” be “humiliated,” and that these figures should become “the new Don Lemons when this is all over.” The speaker warns that if there is a cover-up or if “Israel was involved” and “these scumbags over here have been propagating this gosh damn lie,” then these media figures have been “dividing us, divide and conquer,” arguing that this rhetoric escalates rather than deescalates, and that such divisions expose that “they don't work on behalf of America, allegedly,” but “on behalf of a foreign gosh damn intelligence agency,” asserting they “should be treated like the traitors that they are.” They conclude with a sensational line: “Forty days later, there's people running away after Charlie Kirk was shot” and label “slop media, slop ink, con ink” as “gay.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I think it's time that we really start to pay attention and really take notes. I want everybody in America to remember every single person specifically pushing that the left assassinated Charlie Kirk. Something's not right here. I don't know what it is. Now this is just my opinion, but I think it's weird that all the alleged closet homosexuals are now putting their wives in their photo to try to, you know, make you not think otherwise. Okay? It's just weird. And now it's just my opinion. I just think he's gay. I just there's something weird about this dude. I don't know what it is. It's Mossad vibes all over it. But that's, again, my opinion. Nothing in this video stated as a fact. So do your own research. But Jack Wozobic says, new. Breaking. Breaking. New footage released of the Charlie Kirk aftermath murder. Come on, bro. Get out of here. Never forget what the left did that day. Oh, we won't, bro. And we're definitely not gonna forget what you've done every day since. And it sure as hell ain't helping your boy, Charlie Kirk. All you're over here doing is covering up the assassination. At least we think you are anyways, but, again, that's just our opinion. But this is a pivotal moment in American history. After this, I pray every single day. I hope everybody prays that Candace Owens comes with the receipts and the heat to just blow this investigation wide the hell open. Okay? So that way, after this is all done, project Mockingbird, Mockingbird Media, every one of these scumbags should be investigated. Every penny, every dollar, where the money came from, where the funding's going, how they got it, who organized it, who helped fundraise for it, who campaigned for it. Every one of these shows should be mocked. I mean, mocked out of existence. They should have no career in media. They should be humiliated. These guys should be literally the new Don Lemons when this is all over. If this investigation turns out that there's some cover up or that Israel was involved and these scumbags over here have been propagating this gosh damn lie, literally dividing us, divide and conquer. Right? That's how we're the best. We're the slaves. We're the sheep. We're the goyam when they divide and conquer us. And this is what this rhetoric does here. It doesn't deescalate the situation. It escalates it. And that's exactly what they want. Why? Well, because they don't work on behalf of America, allegedly. They work on behalf of a foreign gosh damn intelligence agency and should be treated like the traitors that they are. Just my opinion. Oh my gosh, you guys. Forty days later, there's people running away after Charlie Kirk was shot breaking. Fucking slop, boys. Slop media, slop ink, con ink, call it what you wanna call it. I call it gay.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Did you know 77 cattle ranchers in America are going out of business everyday and now President Trump plans to use our tax dollar to buy beef from Argentina? https://t.co/8ZK74BQojw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses a visceral rejection of “America first,” declaring, “America only,” and argues that the stance is unacceptable. The post they discuss should anger viewers, focusing on a beef initiative tweet about Trump saying the U.S. would buy Argentina beef. A reporter asks what he says to US ranchers who are “losing their shit.” His answer: “Argentina is fighting for its life. They're dying.” Speaker 0 notes that 77 American cattle producers per day are going out of business and praises Shipwrecked, urging viewers to follow her for opposing Argentina beef and supporting local farmers who would welcome their business. Speaker 1 responds by insisting that Argentina is “fighting for its life,” and that viewers don’t understand the situation. She argues that nothing is benefiting Argentina and that they are “dying” and have no money, while he says he “likes the president of Argentina” and believes he’s trying to do the best he can, though he emphasizes they are not doing well. Speaker 0 pushes back, asserting that America doesn’t care if Argentina is dying. He condemns the government for sending tax dollars to “third world” countries while continuing to send bombs to Israel, accusing the government of “Israel first propaganda.” He claims that $30,000,000,000 is sent to Israel yearly, and suggests that if the government wouldn’t fund Israel so heavily, there would be less objection to buying beef from Argentina. He reiterates that 77 American cattle farmers go out of business every day and contends that more people will awaken to oppose the “America first agenda.” He concludes with a forceful assertion that it is “America motherfucking only,” and tells those not on the “America only” side to “get the fuck out.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know what? I am I'm just so sick of the gosh damn America first bullshit. It's America only motherfuckers. From here on out, that's it. America only. I am so fed up with this bullshit, and this this post should make you as pissed off as it makes me. So beef beef initiative puts out this tweet, and they said, Trump said, we'll buy Argentina beef. The reporter asked, well, what'd you say to US ranchers who are losing their shit? His answer, Argentina is fighting for its life. They're dying. Meanwhile, 77 American cattle producers a day are going out of business. Did you hear that? 77 American cattle ranchers per day are going out of business. And thank god for Shipwrecked. She's a top g. I absolutely love this girl. If you're not following Shipwrecked show, give this chick a follow. She says, I will not be buying Argentina beef, my guy. Struck out here. There are local farmers who would love your business. Go find one. Check out this video from this trader Trump. Question is, what do you have to say to US farmers who feel that the deal is benefiting Argentina more than it is them as they are Speaker 1: a Argentina is fighting for its life, young lady. You don't know anything about it. They're fighting for their life. Nothing is benefiting Argentina. They're fighting for their life. You understand what that means? They have no money. They have no anything. They're fighting so hard to survive. If I can help them survive in a free world, I happen to like the president of Argentina. I think he's trying to do the best he can, but don't make it sound like they're doing great. They are dying. Alright? They're dying. Speaker 0: What do you America doesn't give a fuck if they're dying, my guy. No one gives a gosh damn shit. We are so sick and fucking tired of our tax dollars being sent over to third world fucking countries while you continuously send fucking bombs to Israel and every member of our gosh damn government just bends over every single day a relentless barrage of nonstop Israel first propaganda. You know, maybe if you didn't send $30,000,000,000 to Israel year, we wouldn't give a shit if you bought a few $100,000,000 worth of beef from Argentina. But when 77 American cattle farmers are going out of business every single day, you're gonna have more and more people like myself waking up in every day and saying, fuck your America first agenda. Shove America first straight up your gosh damn asses. This point forward, it's America motherfucking only. And if you guys aren't on the America only side, get the fuck out.
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:19 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

John Ratcliffe stands exposed as a profoundly compromised traitor, whose insidious dissemination of fabricated intelligence to the President of the United States was nothing less than a deliberate act of treason. https://t.co/46cGoICQGZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker claims that John Ratcliffe, the CIA, and Mossad are all the same, asserting that CIA and Mossad were involved with the assassination of Charlie Kirk and questioning where Steve Bannon stands on that issue. The speaker lambasts Ratcliffe as a “gosh damn fraud” and accuses intelligence agencies of destroying the country, urging removal, arrest, and charging of these figures. - The speaker recounts past involvement with Steve Bannon’s network, saying they used to be on frequently to discuss border and child trafficking topics, but after shifting to child trafficking, Bannon became unavailable. The speaker asks viewers to comment on whether they should appear on Bannon’s show again when a new documentary on child trafficking is released in November, and claims to have sent many texts to Bannon’s daughter, suggesting a sense of personal outreach that went unanswered. - A request is made for Bannon to show up on the speaker’s channel, with the speaker implying a personal connection and asking viewers to indicate if they think the speaker should appear on Bannon’s show as the new documentary drops. - The speaker urges viewers to watch their video and claims that Ratcliffe is a “gosh damn fraud” and a traitor, arguing that the two-tier justice system exists because intelligence agencies are “destroying our gosh damn country.” - Speaker 1 adds, supporting a broader conspiracy narrative: Witkoff is briefed three times a day by the CIA, and they lie to him. The speaker asserts this is not a marginal intelligence mistake but a deliberate pattern. - The discussion moves to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with claims that Hamas “doesn’t wanna do the deal” and that this comes from the Mossad and Netanyahu. There are calls for Ratcliffe to resign or for a congressional hearing on national television to reveal what Ratcliffe told negotiators. - The speaker references the beginning of a twelve-day war and says what Ratcliffe told the president about it was a lie, supported by a claim from the Times of Israel that cabinet minutes show Netanyahu’s cabinet was two years away from any emergency, not two days or two weeks. The speaker contends there was an emergency to kill negotiators so Witkoff could not meet in Muscat, Oman, on a Sunday, alleging that Mossad controls the CIA. - The closing remark credits Tulsi Gabbard and claims she was targeted or run out of the city, reinforcing the theme of institutional control by Mossad over American intelligence agencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John Ratcliffe, the CIA, they're all in on it. Right? CIA, Mossad, it's all one and the same. And you expect us to believe that Mossad and CIA wasn't involved with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Where are you at, Bannon, on that? Where are you at, Steve Bannon, on the assassination? Charlie Kirk was your freaking boy, and you have been silent on all this. But the Ratcliffe shit you're gonna go in hard on, why not the Charlie Kirk assassination? But this is a good video, so I like I used to be freaking on Bannon's network all the gosh damn time. Anytime I was talking about the border or child trafficking or border, Bannon would have me on. I was breaking all the stories, then all of sudden I started talking about child trafficking, and Bannon's nowhere to be found. Bizarre, isn't it? Yo, Bannon, this one's for you, homie. You're gonna bring me back on? I got a new documentary on child trafficking coming out in November. I'd love to come on your show. I thought we were boys. I've sent your daughter. I can't tell you how many text messages trying to come on your network. Maybe you didn't get them. Let's know. Let me let me know in the comments if you guys think I should go on Bannon as soon as my new documentary drops and blow this sucker through the roof. John Ratcliffe, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, is a gosh damn fraud. You need to check out this video of Bannon because this is treasonous. These guys are traitor scumbags, and they need to be removed from our government, arrested, and charged accordingly, or we're never gonna have a country. I'm so sick of this two tier justice system where our intelligence agencies are destroying our gosh damn country. But I wanna know what you guys think. Drop those comments below. Check out this video. Speaker 1: What they said about the Central Intelligence Agency is what I've been saying on this show from the beginning, and it came from their mouths now. Witkoff is briefed three times a day by the CIA, and they lie to him. This is not a this is not some marginal mistake in intelligence. He sat right there. They they lied to him three times a day. Hamas doesn't wanna do the deal. Never gonna do the deal. That's the Mossad talking. That's Netanyahu talking. Ratcliffe should resign today, or let's just have a congressional hearing, right, on national television, and let's just put it out there exactly about what you told these people in this negotiation, and let's go back to what you told the president of The United States about the beginning of the twelve day war because that was a lie also as now we know by the times of Israel putting out the cabinet minutes of the war cabinet on Netanyahu. They were two years away. Not two days, not two weeks, two years, of which he copped a half of that on Brett Bear on that same night. Said, yeah. It's six months, nine months, it's a year. Wasn't two days, wasn't two weeks, it was two years. Basically, there ain't no emergency. There was an emergency to kill the negotiators of which they did so that Witkoff couldn't have a meeting in Muscat, Oman on that Sunday. Why? Because this Mossad controls the CAA. Thank god for Tulsi Gabbard. They tried to run Tulsi Gabbard out of this city.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

We are now 40 days post Charlie Kirk assassination and the FBI has yet to produce one photo or one video that showers Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley University the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. https://t.co/WG14FcDIFl

Video Transcript AI Summary
On behalf of every single American citizen, we’re all thinking exactly what Morgan Ariel is tweeting. She goes by at itsmorganariel on X, gives her girl a follow. She says, what in the actual f? Is it very possible that Tyler Robinson was never on the roof the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination? At FBI director Kesh Patel, we want answers and we want them now. Remember the magic TMZ video? What do you notice about this dude spreading across the college campus right here? Right after the assassination. He looks awfully familiar to the dude that the TMZ video gave us, didn’t they? Let me turn the camera around and show you this a little closer. So we literally have this man that’s right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. He’s sprinting across the campus. When you zoom in on that dude, looks really familiar. Hat, same. Let me pull that one up a little bit bigger. So we’ve got his hat here, the same maroon shirt, light/dark shorts, light shoes. Maroon shirt, dark shirt, light shoes, hats almost identical. Eye freaking identical, isn’t it? And, actually, I can make that a little bit better for you guys. Check this out. There you go. Looks really weird, doesn’t it? Looks oh, oh my gosh. Identical. Right? Are we just getting lucky, or is that the exact same person? Because it sure as shit looks like the exact same person. I don’t know about you guys, but this entire investigation just thinks like shit. The only people are literally still believing the FBI’s narrative is Jack Wasellbick, now Stephen Gardner and Benny Johnson and the rest of the goon squad over at DP USA. Us Americans, anybody that has a brain, anybody that’s able to logically think for themselves, looks at all the evidence the FBI has presented and says that’s a load of shit. This kid is never gonna make it to a trial. We’re never gonna see those videos. They’re gonna Epstein his ass. They’re gonna rig this trial. Call it what you wanna call it. They’re gonna probably come out with some geolocation data and try to convince you that he was on the roof right when they kill him and they slide him out the back door. He ends up over in Israel sipping pina coladas with Epstein. Drop those comments below. Let me know what you think. My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanted to say I'd be on behalf of every single American citizen. We're all thinking exactly what Morgan Ariel is tweeting. She goes by at its morgan ariel over on x, gives her girl a follow. She's off the hook. She says, what in the actual f? She says, is it very possible that Tyler Robinson was never on the roof the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination? At FBI director Kesh Patel, we want answers and we want them now. So remember the magic TMZ video? What do you notice about this dude spreading across the college campus right here? Right? Right after the assassination. He looks awful familiar to the dude that the TMZ video gave us, didn't they? Let me let me turn the camera around and show you this a little closer. Okay. So we literally have this man that's right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. He's literally sprinting across the campus. When you zoom in on that dude, looks really familiar. Hat, same. Let me actually pull that one up a little bit bigger. So we got his hat here the same, maroon shirt, light dark shorts, light shoes. Maroon shirt, dark shirt, light shoes, hats almost identical. Eye freaking identical, isn't it? And, actually, I can make that a little bit better for you guys. Check this out. There you go. Looks really weird, doesn't it? Looks oh, oh my gosh. Identical. Right? Are we just getting lucky, or is that the exact same person? Because it sure as shit looks like the exact same person. I don't know about you guys, but this entire investigation just thinks like shit. The only people are literally still believing the FBI's narrative is Jack Wasellbick, now Stephen Gardner and Benny Johnson and the rest of the goon squad over at DP USA. Us Americans, anybody that has a brain, anybody that's able to logically think for themselves, looks at all the evidence the FBI has presented and says that's a load of shit. This kid is never gonna make it to a trial. We're never gonna see those videos. They're gonna Epstein his ass. They're gonna rig this trial. Call it what you wanna call it. They're gonna probably come out with some geolocation data and try to convince you that he was on the roof right when they kill him and they slide him out the back door. He ends up over in Israel sipping pina coladas with Epstein. Drop those comments below. Let me know what you think. My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? https://t.co/YuykssnZKz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the claim that Candace Owens made that Charlie Kirk was 100% hit from the front, bullets shoot straight, and that we know he was shot from the front. The speaker argues logically about entry wound in the neck with no exit wound: the only logical thing that could have stopped the bullet in the neck would be the spine. If the bullet came in and ended up hitting the spine, whether it went down, around, or out the armpit, the fact that it hit his throat and went into his neck and then didn’t go out the back would logically lead to the belief that he was shot almost from straight on or perhaps from an off-center angle like 01:00 or 11:00, because the trajectory would have had to hit the spine to stop. If it hadn’t hit the spine, an angled shot from that side could have torn through the jugular or gone through to the other side. The speaker concludes that the only logical conclusion is that he was hit from the front. The speaker mentions the possibility of a drone and a second shooter at a much farther away position, praising Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical for drone surveillance. Three-D renderings and images of the campus layout are expected, aiming to determine definitively whether anyone else in an elevated position had a clear line of sight to shoot Charlie Kirk from the front. The speaker dismisses trapdoors or a bullet coming from the ground or AI as unlikely, asserting that the observed reaction of Charlie Kirk’s body supports a front-shot scenario. The speaker notes that something appeared to blow him out of the chair and questions how the necklace could have been blown off. The speaker suggests another type of device could have been simulated at the moment of the shooting, possible with gas-powered or air-powered technology that agencies like Mossad possess; they could have designed a camera with a hidden gun that would shoot Charlie from the front. According to the speaker, the logical sequence is: Charlie Kirk was shot, the bullet entered the neck, most likely hit the spine, and caused the described body reaction. Until more definitive proof of another logical explanation is found, the speaker remains aligned with the front-shot interpretation. The speaker then invites viewers to comment with “front” or “side” and to participate in a Twitter Space at 5 PM where an expert will discuss Charlie Kirk’s security detail. The speaker identifies themselves as Ryan Mehta and signs off, inviting viewers to join at 05:00.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Address the claim that Candace Owens made that Charlie Kirk was 100% hit from the front, bullets shoot straight, and we know that he was shot from the front. Okay? So you think about this logically. Right? It doesn't really matter what weapon you use. When you're talking about somebody's neck and this being an entry wound and there being no exit wound, the only logical thing that could have stopped that bullet in your neck would be your spine. So if the bullet came in and then ended up getting hitting the spine whether that went down, up, around this, you know, out the fucking armpit, I don't know. But the fact that it hit his throat and went into his neck here, right, and then didn't go out the back would logically lead you to believe that he was shot almost from straight on or maybe off to his like 01:00 or his 11:00 because the trajectory, the bullet would have had to have hit the spine to stop. If it wouldn't have hit the spine, if it would have been shot from this side say and would have went, you know, on an angle through his neck or would have went this way on an angle that way, you know, just your jugular, bullet would have blown right through his neck and went right out the other side or right through this way and right out the other side. The only logical conclusion one can make is that he was hit from the front, which makes the most sense. Right? We most likely had a drone. We most likely had a second shooter at a much farther away position and that's what's great about the research that Gary is doing. Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical, he had the drone surveillance. So we're gonna get three d renderings and images of the entire layout of the campus. You're gonna know without a shadow of a doubt, 100% fact, was there anybody else in any other position at an elevated position that could have got a clear line of sight and shot Charlie Kirk from the front. So I think that like the idea of trapdoors or like a bullet coming from the ground or this being AI, I just I'm just not buying them. The only thing that makes logical sense, we watched his body react. Right? It almost was like something blew him out of the chair. How would that happen? What would blow off his necklace now? Now blowing off his necklace is another thing. Right? Now that we can talk about did something detonate under his shirt and I think we're very very confident that some other type of device was simultaneously simulated at the moment that he shot. And if you're Mossad and you're these agencies, they have gas powered guns, they have air powered guns, they have all of this advanced technology. So it wouldn't like it'd be like it would hard it would be hard for them to do to have designed one of the cameras. We've seen that video yesterday where it's crystal clear. It could easily they could have easily created some type of device, some type of camera that had a hidden gun in it that would have shot Charlie, but also would have been from the front. Okay? So I think the only logical reason when you watch this chain of events is you're going, yeah. He was shot, bullet went into his neck, and then eventually most likely hit the spine. So until we have some more definitive proof of of another logical reason, how do you get the body to react the way that it did? You watch something literally protrude. How do we do this? You watch when he gets shot here in the back. You literally watch something that's like comes out the back of his neck. It was like something went in, hit that spine, snapped his spine, and literally pushed his entire spinal cord towards the back of his skin and like literally protruded his neck out and his neck came back. Okay? So until we find other any other evidence, I don't know what you guys think. What do you guys think? Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? Drop a one in the comments. Just drop front or side. Right? I wanna know. What do you guys Front side AI, give me your best shill down in the comments. I wanna hear it. And then come join us today at 5PM for our Twitter space because we have an expert that's coming on to break down all the details about Charlie Kirk security detail. My name is Ryan Mehta. We'll see you guys there at 05:00. Peace.
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:19 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? https://t.co/3YEYZb82W1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan Mehta addresses claims about Candace Owens’ assertion that Charlie Kirk was “100% hit from the front” and that bullets “shoot straight.” He discusses the neck wound logic: with an entry wound in the throat and no exit wound, the only logical thing that could stop the bullet would be the spine. If the bullet entered the neck and did not exit, the trajectory would suggest a shot from almost straight on or from about 01:00 or 11:00 position, because the spine would have to stop the bullet. He argues that a shot from the side or a diagonal through the neck would have caused the bullet to exit the neck, whereas the observed wound path implies a front-facing shot as the most logical conclusion. Mehta mentions the possibility of a drone and a second shooter at a much greater distance, highlighting Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical and his drone surveillance. He says three depth-renderings and images of the entire campus layout will be produced to determine if anyone else in an elevated position had a clear line of sight to shoot Charlie Kirk from the front. He dismisses trapdoors or AI as explanations, asserting that the chain of events supports a front-shot hypothesis and notes the observed reaction of Kirk’s body, suggesting the neck and spinal response. He questions how the body reacted—specifically describing an apparent protrusion and the neck being pushed back—and mentions the necklace coming off. He speculates that something could have detonated under Kirk’s shirt, asserting confidence that some other device was simulated at the moment of the shot. He references expertise and tools available to agencies like Mossad, noting they have gas-powered and air-powered guns, and suggests they could have designed a camera with a hidden gun that would shoot from the front. He states that the logical conclusion from watching the events is that Kirk was shot, the bullet entered the neck, and most likely hit the spine. Mehta asks viewers for their input, prompting them to comment whether they think Kirk was shot from the front or the side, and invites them to join a Twitter Space at 5 PM where an expert will discuss Charlie Kirk’s security detail. He signs off as Ryan Mehta.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Address the claim that Candace Owens made that Charlie Kirk was 100% hit from the front, bullets shoot straight, and we know that he was shot from the front. Okay? So you think about this logically. Right? It doesn't really matter what weapon you use. When you're talking about somebody's neck and this being an entry wound and there being no exit wound, the only logical thing that could have stopped that bullet in your neck would be your spine. So if the bullet came in and then ended up getting hitting the spine whether that went down, up, around this, you know, out the fucking armpit, I don't know. But the fact that it hit his throat and went into his neck here, right, and then didn't go out the back would logically lead you to believe that he was shot almost from straight on or maybe off to his like 01:00 or his 11:00 because the trajectory, the bullet would have had to have hit the spine to stop. If it wouldn't have hit the spine, if it would have been shot from this side say and would have went, you know, on an angle through his neck or would have went this way on an angle that way, you know, just your jugular, bullet would have blown right through his neck and went right out the other side or right through this way and right out the other side. The only logical conclusion one can make is that he was hit from the front, which makes the most sense. Right? We most likely had a drone. We most likely had a second shooter at a much farther away position and that's what's great about the research that Gary is doing. Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical, he had the drone surveillance. So we're gonna get three d renderings and images of the entire layout of the campus. You're gonna know without a shadow of a doubt, 100% fact, was there anybody else in any other position at an elevated position that could have got a clear line of sight and shot Charlie Kirk from the front. So I think that like the idea of trapdoors or like a bullet coming from the ground or this being AI, I just I'm just not buying them. The only thing that makes logical sense, we watched his body react. Right? It almost was like something blew him out of the chair. How would that happen? What would blow off his necklace now? Now blowing off his necklace is another thing. Right? Now that we can talk about did something detonate under his shirt and I think we're very very confident that some other type of device was simultaneously simulated at the moment that he shot. And if you're Mossad and you're these agencies, they have gas powered guns, they have air powered guns, they have all of this advanced technology. So it wouldn't like it'd be like it would hard it would be hard for them to do to have designed one of the cameras. We've seen that video yesterday where it's crystal clear. It could easily they could have easily created some type of device, some type of camera that had a hidden gun in it that would have shot Charlie, but also would have been from the front. Okay? So I think the only logical reason when you watch this chain of events is you're going, yeah. He was shot, bullet went into his neck, and then eventually most likely hit the spine. So until we have some more definitive proof of of another logical reason, how do you get the body to react the way that it did? You watch something literally protrude. How do we do this? You watch when he gets shot here in the back. You literally watch something that's like comes out the back of his neck. It was like something went in, hit that spine, snapped his spine, and literally pushed his entire spinal cord towards the back of his skin and like literally protruded his neck out and his neck came back. Okay? So until we find other any other evidence, I don't know what you guys think. What do you guys think? Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? Drop a one in the comments. Just drop front or side. Right? I wanna know. What do you guys Front side AI, give me your best shill down in the comments. I wanna hear it. And then come join us today at 5PM for our Twitter space because we have an expert that's coming on to break down all the details about Charlie Kirk security detail. My name is Ryan Mehta. We'll see you guys there at 05:00. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why would a self proclaimed right wing podcaster be doing a podcast circuit and shilling the FBIs narrative about Tyler Robinson when we all know it’s a complete lie? https://t.co/KYzNmcHaTS

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the discussion, the speakers focus on forensic details and the handling of evidence surrounding the Charlie Kirk case and Tyler Robinson. Stefan Gardner is cited as stating that “dust samples alone will go a long way in ending speculation about Tyler Robinson fired the shot that killed Charlie Kirk,” arguing that the dust on the rocks will have a unique signature and will be on the killer’s clothes, gun, and shoes. The dust and soil samples are expected to show dust on the tread of shoes and soil where the gun was laid, and gun residue on the hands from handling the weapon. A forensic expert is quoted saying the roof where the shooting occurred was covered in pebbles and rocks, so dust signatures will be found on the shooter’s clothes, gun, and shoes, and that the car is also a major part of the evidence due to dust, soil, and gun residue on the steering wheel from the shooter’s hands. There is discussion about the sequence of events: the shooter allegedly disassembling or reassembling the gun, laying down a towel, firing, rolling up the gun, and leaving within about fourteen seconds to flee into the woods. The possibility is mentioned that the shooter could be identified by dust on the gear and by the car evidence. James Lee responds to the crowd, accusing others of focusing on dust samples while dismissing the need to first match the bullet to a gun, calling out the discussion as clownish. The conversation anticipates trial evidence including shoe DNA and other forensic marks, with a sense that official video footage might be suppressed or lost while experts testify about the evidence. The speakers criticize the FBI narrative, arguing that none of the FBI’s presented evidence has made sense, particularly challenging the 30-06 caliber discussion. They reference a prior demonstration with a 30-06 round fired into a setup of meat to simulate a neck wound, a steel plate, and a two-liter bottle, asserting that even the smallest 30-06 round would not produce the described result at the distance claimed, and suggesting Tyler Robinson would have been inside 150 yards. There is insistence that video footage exists and should be released to restore trust, including CCTV footage showing Tyler Robinson’s movements on campus—climbing onto the roof, taking the shot, and sprinting away. They call for CCTV footage and autopsy video to be released, along with video showing Tyler Robinson at the crime scene for four hours, arguing that the investigation would be more transparent if these materials were made public rather than kept from the public eye. The speakers express distrust of the FBI and other agencies, alleging deep state manipulation and claiming that video and DNA evidence could be forged or misrepresented, while demanding concrete, visible evidence in the form of footage and autopsy details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So after this video plays, I want you guys to tell me what your first thought is. Right? So before I tell you my rant, which I'm gonna do at the end of this video, I want you guys to right now watch this, then stop it right when it ends and go down in the comments and just tell me what your first exact thought is when you when you listen to this story. To Mario in the falls, he said, Stefan Gardner, forensic evidence will end Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories. Stefan Gardner believes that the dust samples alone will go a long way in ending speculation about Tyler Robinson fired the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. One thing that forensic expert told me is that the dust on the rocks is going to have a unique signature. It's going to be on his clothes, and it's going to be on the gun. It's going to be on his shoes. Okay. I'll let you guys watch this. Speaker 1: So from what I've read, they believe he put some portion of the gun together on the roof before he runs out and lays down. But as far as disassembling it and changing clothes and getting off the roof, I I think that was bad information that has since been corrected. If he's run so I'm just I I try to like I watch a lot of movies, so I try to just think in terms of movies, right? Like, he probably lays down the towel. He lays down. He takes the shot, throws the gun, rolls it up, and he's gone. He's off and running within like three seconds. It takes him about fourteen seconds from his position to jumping off the roof, and then he's gone into the into the wooded area. So one one thing that that forensic expert told me is he said, Steven, the the dust on the rocks, because that roof is covered in in like pebbles rocks. Right? He said that's going to have a unique signature. So it's gonna be on his clothes. It's gonna be on the gun. It's gonna be on his shoes. So he said his shoes are a major part of this investigation. I thought, oh, that's really interesting. I didn't think about that. He said, you know, they're gonna have dust on the tread. They're gonna have soil from where he lays lays the gun. They're gonna have the dust from when he lays down. There's no way to not get dust on your shoes if you lay down. Right? So he said that's gonna be a major part. His car is also going to be a major part of the trial. I said why? He said because he's gonna sit down. There's gonna be that dust. There's gonna be soil samples. There's also going to be gun residue from taking a shot on his hands. Now he puts his hands on his steering wheel. So that car is a major part of the evidence as well. Speaker 0: So my man James Lee over here, he says, dust samples, how about you first match the bullet with a gun? Y'all are such clowns. And this was at at 5149 James Lee. Make sure you give that man a follow. There's all of this evidence that we're gonna see at trial. Right? Like, we're gonna really see it at trial because it sounds like magically the videotapes are gonna get lost. Tyler Robinson's gonna get Epstein. All of this is gonna fade away, but we're gonna have experts that we're gonna say that the shoe and the DNA evidence that matched the killer. You know? And I was, like, sleeping, so, like, I had to get up to, like, make this video. So I'm tired. But it's that embarrassing, right, that I had to get up and I'm so now Steven is going around on all of the right wing podcast. Right? Anybody that they will take him, basically. And he's pitching the FBI slop narrative, and he's, like, trying to reconfirm it. When none of this entire investigation makes sense, none of the evidence the FBI has presented has made sense, specifically the 30 odd six. So yesterday, we played a video. In the 30 odd six video, this guy's we had, like, three different calibers of 30 odd six round, and he has a half inch thick steel plate. He has a meat, a big fat chunk of meat that's to stimulate the neck. Then behind it, he has a two liter bottle. And this bullet goes through the meat, through the steel plate, and then out the other side through the two liter. All of them, even the smallest 30 odd six round that the guy shot. So, I mean, there is absolutely not a chance in hell that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck with a 30 odd six at any distance. This guy was at a 150 yards. Tyler Robinson was allegedly in inside that. Charlie said it would have been blown off. Okay? So we can start that. Let's talk about the bullet. Let's talk about the video evidence that we have. Let's talk about the stuff that any normal investigation at this level would be presenting just to shut the people up. Like, you wanna earn the trust back of the American people. You wanna be the most transparent FBI in American history. How about you start with just, I don't know, releasing some video footage, and he's on video. They're like, it's gonna hurt the investigation. They're not gonna leak any of this information, but it's gonna hurt the investigation. What? It's video evidence. The guy literally assassinated Charlie Kirk. We all watched it. 3,000 people live seen it. There's 3,000 witnesses to watch what happened, and there's video evidence of you plotting this whole thing out and spending, like, four hours at the campus walking all around, up and down stairwells, in and out of parking garages. So just show us the video footage. Right? People have a gate. Right? The gate is like a fingerprint. So when you are walking, right, the movement of your legs as you walk and you separate between them, that is a gate. Security cameras all over the world, when the FBI is tracking and doing their shit, they're literally the AI is tracking your gate, the gap between your legs. So Tyler Robinson is walking all over this campus. So the CCTV footage that we're gonna see in trial, right, is gonna clearly show and dictate that, you know, Tyler Robinson is our guy. Right? The video footage of him climbing onto the roof, getting in the in the prone position, and then taking that shot, and then somehow within three seconds being up in less than three seconds being up in a full sprint across that roof, nowhere nobody's buying it. We're not gonna believe that there was cell phone geolocation data that you're tracking to, like, the exact bathroom spot. Right? You know, even when you yeah. I guess you can. You you say you lost your watch, you know, and find my iPhone, and it brings you brings you pretty damn close to it. But so, yeah, maybe they will be able to. But, yeah, I just find it I just find it comical at this point to expect that we're supposed to trust some expert. Like, the FBI, the people at bay that control our government and obviously blackmail the entire world and then sell politicians and assassinate presidents and, like, these people are pros at this. Right? They deep state they exist. They could never fake DNA evidence. Evidence. They They could could never never come up with some harebrained scheme like this and get some expert to lie and say that he tested this and it tested positive. Right? There's no way that that's possible, is it? They couldn't forge this data. The FBI, the CIA, the most powerful intelligence agency in the entire world, Mossad, couldn't forge any of this information, any of this evidence. Show us the CCTV footage. Let's talk about the bullet. Let's hear about this autopsy. Okay? Let's show us the videos of Tyler Robinson spending four hours at the crime scene. Okay? Because we haven't seen any of that, and this is slop.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owens just quote tweeted Sam Parker’s thread and claimed she has enough evidence to burn the house down with the new evidence she uncovered pertaining to the Charlie Kirk investigation! https://t.co/ZSbuvMVKh3

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the latest update, Sam Parker posts about a developing story on the judge involved in the replacement and related search terms in Israel, noting that the judge Tony Gap and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunen, were both the subject of unique Google searches from Israel’s IP addresses. This information was covered in a prior video, with a link provided. Sam Parker then tweets to Candace Owens, saying, “Candice, check out the receipts on the judges.” Candace retweets, saying, “don’t worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world’s behalf.” She adds that the discoveries from the past week are enough to “burn the house down,” and that “Charlie was betrayed, and he was betrayed by everybody two weeks one week from now,” specifying seven days. Candace Owens also announces that she will be back on their show live. In the meantime, Candace Owens, Sam Parker, and Maze will fill the weekday gap, hosting Monday through Friday from 5 to 6 PM. On Monday, they plan to go deep into Charlie Kirk’s security detail, featuring an expert who has been studying the topic for six hours a day since the Charlie Kirk assassination matter emerged. They promise to bring “the heat” on Monday. They advertise that viewers can learn all the nitty-gritty details by joining them, with links to the X space and the previous post, all of which will be linked in the comments. The message ends with a sign-off: “We out. Peace.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you guys know the video I just made on the report that Sam Parker did on the judge and the replacing of the judge and the searching those search terms in Israel. Well, guess who just retweeted it, and Candice has something she wants to tell you. So Sam Parker says, breaking new Tyler Robinson trial. Tony Gap, the judge that was selected to preside over the assassination trial, and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunen, were both the subject to unique Google searches from Israel's IP addresses. So we covered that in the last video. I'll leave link down below. Then Sam Parker tweeted out and says, Candice, check out the receipts on the judges. That was twenty three minutes ago. Candace says, in a retweet, she says, don't worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world's behalf. The things I've discovered in the past week are enough to burn the house down. Yes. Charlie was betrayed, and he was betrayed by everybody two weeks one week from now. So it'd be seven days. Candace Owens is gonna be back on our show live. Okay? In the meantime, me and the legendary Sam Parker and the legendary Maze will be filling in that gap every weekday, Monday through Friday at five to 6PM. So Monday, we're gonna go deep into Charlie Kirk's security detail. We got an expert. This guy has been studying this for six hours a day since every day since the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we're gonna be bringing the heat on Monday. So if you guys wanna learn all about these nitty gritty details, come join us. Linked to the x space and the previous post, and this post will all be linked down in the comments. We out. Peace.
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:19 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

We are now 40 days post Charlie Kirk assassination and the FBI has yet to produce one photo or one video that showers Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley University the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. https://t.co/WG14FcDIFl

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: On behalf of every single American citizen, we're thinking exactly what Morgan Ariel is tweeting. She goes by at its morgan ariel on X, gives her girl a follow. She's off the hook. She says, what in the actual f? Is it very possible that Tyler Robinson was never on the roof the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination? At FBI director Kesh Patel, we want answers and we want them now. So remember the magic TMZ video? What do you notice about this dude spreading across the college campus right here? Right after the assassination. He looks awful familiar to the dude that the TMZ video gave us, didn't they? Let me turn the camera around and show you this a little closer. Okay. So we literally have this man that's right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. He's sprinting across the campus. When you zoom in on that dude, looks really familiar. Hat, same. Let me actually pull that one up a little bit bigger. So we’ve got his hat here the same, maroon shirt, light dark shorts, light shoes. Maroon shirt, dark shirt, light shoes, hats almost identical. Eye freaking identical, isn't it? And, actually, I can make that a little bit better for you guys. Check this out. There you go. Looks really weird, doesn't it? Looks oh, oh my gosh. Identical. Right? Are we just getting lucky, or is that the exact same person? Because it sure as shit looks like the exact same person. I don't know about you guys, but this entire investigation just thinks like shit. The only people who are literally still believing the FBI's narrative is Jack Wasellbick, now Stephen Gardner and Benny Johnson and the rest of the goon squad over at DP USA. Us Americans, anybody that has a brain, anybody that's able to logically think for themselves, looks at all the evidence the FBI has presented and says that's a load of shit. This kid is never gonna make it to a trial. We're never gonna see those videos. They're gonna Epstein his ass. They're gonna rig this trial. Call it what you wanna call it. They're gonna probably come out with some geolocation data and try to convince you that he was on the roof right when they kill him and they slide him out the back door. He ends up over in Israel sipping pina coladas with Epstein. Drop those comments below. Let me know what you think. My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanted to say I'd be on behalf of every single American citizen. We're all thinking exactly what Morgan Ariel is tweeting. She goes by at its morgan ariel over on x, gives her girl a follow. She's off the hook. She says, what in the actual f? She says, is it very possible that Tyler Robinson was never on the roof the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination? At FBI director Kesh Patel, we want answers and we want them now. So remember the magic TMZ video? What do you notice about this dude spreading across the college campus right here? Right? Right after the assassination. He looks awful familiar to the dude that the TMZ video gave us, didn't they? Let me let me turn the camera around and show you this a little closer. Okay. So we literally have this man that's right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. He's literally sprinting across the campus. When you zoom in on that dude, looks really familiar. Hat, same. Let me actually pull that one up a little bit bigger. So we got his hat here the same, maroon shirt, light dark shorts, light shoes. Maroon shirt, dark shirt, light shoes, hats almost identical. Eye freaking identical, isn't it? And, actually, I can make that a little bit better for you guys. Check this out. There you go. Looks really weird, doesn't it? Looks oh, oh my gosh. Identical. Right? Are we just getting lucky, or is that the exact same person? Because it sure as shit looks like the exact same person. I don't know about you guys, but this entire investigation just thinks like shit. The only people are literally still believing the FBI's narrative is Jack Wasellbick, now Stephen Gardner and Benny Johnson and the rest of the goon squad over at DP USA. Us Americans, anybody that has a brain, anybody that's able to logically think for themselves, looks at all the evidence the FBI has presented and says that's a load of shit. This kid is never gonna make it to a trial. We're never gonna see those videos. They're gonna Epstein his ass. They're gonna rig this trial. Call it what you wanna call it. They're gonna probably come out with some geolocation data and try to convince you that he was on the roof right when they kill him and they slide him out the back door. He ends up over in Israel sipping pina coladas with Epstein. Drop those comments below. Let me know what you think. My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? https://t.co/3YEYZb82W1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan Mehta discusses the claim about Charlie Kirk’s shooting, addressing Candace Owens’ assertion that Kirk was hit from the front and that the bullet shot straight. He argues that the neck entry wound with no exit wound suggests the spinal area stopped the bullet, implying a near-straight-on or slightly angled front impact (01:00 or 11:00 position). He explains that if the shot were from the side or at a different angle, the jugular area would likely have the bullet exit through the neck or the other side, making a front shot the most logical conclusion. Mehta notes the possibility of a drone surveillance setup and a second shooter at a much farther distance, referencing Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical. He mentions drone renderings and images of the campus layout to determine if anyone else at an elevated position could have had a clear line of sight to shoot Kirk from the front, asserting that the research will provide definitive evidence of such a position. He rejects ideas of trapdoors or a bullet coming from the ground and AI manipulation, stating he is not buying those theories. He emphasizes that the observed body reaction—“something blew him out of the chair”—would require further explanation. He discusses the necklace coming off and suggests that overlapping devices might have simulated another type of event at the moment of the shooting, implying a simultaneous device could be involved. Mehta speculates about adversary tech, referencing Mossad or similar agencies with gas-powered or air-powered guns that could be used to create a front-shot camera device capable of shooting Charlie while appearing to originate from the front. He maintains the chain of events supports a front-shot scenario with the bullet entering Kirk’s neck, possibly hitting the spine, and causing a dramatic bodily reaction. He invites viewers to share opinions in the comments, asking them to indicate whether they think Kirk was shot from the front or the side, and to participate in a Twitter Space at 5 PM with an expert to discuss Charlie Kirk’s security detail. He signs off as Ryan Mehta, inviting participation at 05:00. Key points: - The neck entry wound with no exit is argued to indicate a front-on or near-front shot, potentially around 01:00 or 11:00 trajectory. - The possibility of a drone and a second shooter at a distant location is discussed, with Gary Melton’s Paramount Tactical drone surveillance cited as providing three-dimensional renderings of the campus layout. - Rejected theories include trapdoors or ground-level shots and AI manipulation; suggested alternative is a device/camera that could shoot from the front while appearing to come from elsewhere. - Observed physical reactions (neck and spine) are used to support the front-shot claim, though further evidence is called for. - Audience engagement and a forthcoming expert discussion on Charlie Kirk’s security detail are announced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Address the claim that Candace Owens made that Charlie Kirk was 100% hit from the front, bullets shoot straight, and we know that he was shot from the front. Okay? So you think about this logically. Right? It doesn't really matter what weapon you use. When you're talking about somebody's neck and this being an entry wound and there being no exit wound, the only logical thing that could have stopped that bullet in your neck would be your spine. So if the bullet came in and then ended up getting hitting the spine whether that went down, up, around this, you know, out the fucking armpit, I don't know. But the fact that it hit his throat and went into his neck here, right, and then didn't go out the back would logically lead you to believe that he was shot almost from straight on or maybe off to his like 01:00 or his 11:00 because the trajectory, the bullet would have had to have hit the spine to stop. If it wouldn't have hit the spine, if it would have been shot from this side say and would have went, you know, on an angle through his neck or would have went this way on an angle that way, you know, just your jugular, bullet would have blown right through his neck and went right out the other side or right through this way and right out the other side. The only logical conclusion one can make is that he was hit from the front, which makes the most sense. Right? We most likely had a drone. We most likely had a second shooter at a much farther away position and that's what's great about the research that Gary is doing. Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical, he had the drone surveillance. So we're gonna get three d renderings and images of the entire layout of the campus. You're gonna know without a shadow of a doubt, 100% fact, was there anybody else in any other position at an elevated position that could have got a clear line of sight and shot Charlie Kirk from the front. So I think that like the idea of trapdoors or like a bullet coming from the ground or this being AI, I just I'm just not buying them. The only thing that makes logical sense, we watched his body react. Right? It almost was like something blew him out of the chair. How would that happen? What would blow off his necklace now? Now blowing off his necklace is another thing. Right? Now that we can talk about did something detonate under his shirt and I think we're very very confident that some other type of device was simultaneously simulated at the moment that he shot. And if you're Mossad and you're these agencies, they have gas powered guns, they have air powered guns, they have all of this advanced technology. So it wouldn't like it'd be like it would hard it would be hard for them to do to have designed one of the cameras. We've seen that video yesterday where it's crystal clear. It could easily they could have easily created some type of device, some type of camera that had a hidden gun in it that would have shot Charlie, but also would have been from the front. Okay? So I think the only logical reason when you watch this chain of events is you're going, yeah. He was shot, bullet went into his neck, and then eventually most likely hit the spine. So until we have some more definitive proof of of another logical reason, how do you get the body to react the way that it did? You watch something literally protrude. How do we do this? You watch when he gets shot here in the back. You literally watch something that's like comes out the back of his neck. It was like something went in, hit that spine, snapped his spine, and literally pushed his entire spinal cord towards the back of his skin and like literally protruded his neck out and his neck came back. Okay? So until we find other any other evidence, I don't know what you guys think. What do you guys think? Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot from the front? Drop a one in the comments. Just drop front or side. Right? I wanna know. What do you guys Front side AI, give me your best shill down in the comments. I wanna hear it. And then come join us today at 5PM for our Twitter space because we have an expert that's coming on to break down all the details about Charlie Kirk security detail. My name is Ryan Mehta. We'll see you guys there at 05:00. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why would a self proclaimed right wing podcaster be doing a podcast circuit and shilling the FBIs narrative about Tyler Robinson when we all know it’s a complete lie? https://t.co/yPu0Eaziom

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a video discussion, Stefan Gardner argues that forensic evidence, particularly dust samples, will effectively end conspiracy theories about who fired the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. He contends that dust from the rocks on the roof will leave a unique signature that will be found on the killer’s clothes, the gun, and the shoes, making shoe tread and soil samples crucial to the investigation. Gardner also notes that dust and soil will be found on items connected to the killer’s lay-down on the roof and asserts that gun residue on the killer’s hands would be transferred to the steering wheel, making the killer’s car a major part of the evidence. Responding to this, another speaker, James Lee, mocks the idea that dust matching should come before bullet-to-gun matching, calling the discussion about dust a clownish distraction. The conversation emphasizes the broader expectation that trial evidence will concede to the narrative that the killer’s DNA and shoe dust will identify the perpetrator, while acknowledging public skepticism about the FBI’s presentation of evidence and the timing of disclosures. The speakers contrast the claimed forensic signatures with perceived gaps in the FBI’s narrative, arguing that the investigation will eventually reveal the gun, DNA, and other physical proof at trial. They anticipate that the evidence will demonstrate that the shooter’s shoes and vehicle contain trace material consistent with the crime scene and that the gun was used, but they express doubt about official explanations and the timing or availability of certain evidence, including video footage. A central theme is a critique of the FBI and their handling of the case: the speakers challenge the transparency of the investigation, suggesting that video footage and CCTV evidence should be released to restore public trust. They reference the demand for CCTV footage showing key actions: Tyler Robinson on campus, climbing onto the roof, taking the shot, and then fleeing. They assert there is video evidence of the shooting and question why it has not been released, noting claims that 3,000 people witnessed the incident live and that there is video evidence of planning and movement around the campus, including entrances and parking structures. The dialogue also touches on inconsistencies alleged in material evidence, such as a 30-06 round discussion, with the group arguing that even the smallest round would not plausibly produce the described wound at the distances claimed. They insist that standard investigative procedures would include sharing footage and autopsy details, and they demand transparency on the autopsy, CCTV, and video evidence from the crime scene. Overall, the speakers insist that the investigation should present complete video footage and corroborating evidence to verify the narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson and the murder of Charlie Kirk, labeling the current presentation as “slop.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So after this video plays, I want you guys to tell me what your first thought is. Right? So before I tell you my rant, which I'm gonna do at the end of this video, I want you guys to right now watch this, then stop it right when it ends and go down in the comments and just tell me what your first exact thought is when you when you listen to this story. To Mario in the falls, he said, Stefan Gardner, forensic evidence will end Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories. Stefan Gardner believes that the dust samples alone will go a long way in ending speculation about Tyler Robinson fired the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. One thing that forensic expert told me is that the dust on the rocks is going to have a unique signature. It's going to be on his clothes, and it's going to be on the gun. It's going to be on his shoes. Okay. I'll let you guys watch this. Speaker 1: So from what I've read, they believe he put some portion of the gun together on the roof before he runs out and lays down. But as far as disassembling it and changing clothes and getting off the roof, I I think that was bad information that has since been corrected. If he's run so I'm just I I try to like I watch a lot of movies, so I try to just think in terms of movies, right? Like, he probably lays down the towel. He lays down. He takes the shot, throws the gun, rolls it up, and he's gone. He's off and running within like three seconds. It takes him about fourteen seconds from his position to jumping off the roof, and then he's gone into the into the wooded area. So one one thing that that forensic expert told me is he said, Steven, the the dust on the rocks, because that roof is covered in in like pebbles rocks. Right? He said that's going to have a unique signature. So it's gonna be on his clothes. It's gonna be on the gun. It's gonna be on his shoes. So he said his shoes are a major part of this investigation. I thought, oh, that's really interesting. I didn't think about that. He said, you know, they're gonna have dust on the tread. They're gonna have soil from where he lays lays the gun. They're gonna have the dust from when he lays down. There's no way to not get dust on your shoes if you lay down. Right? So he said that's gonna be a major part. His car is also going to be a major part of the trial. I said why? He said because he's gonna sit down. There's gonna be that dust. There's gonna be soil samples. There's also going to be gun residue from taking a shot on his hands. Now he puts his hands on his steering wheel. So that car is a major part of the evidence as well. Speaker 0: So my man James Lee over here, he says, dust samples, how about you first match the bullet with a gun? Y'all are such clowns. And this was at at 5149 James Lee. Make sure you give that man a follow. There's all of this evidence that we're gonna see at trial. Right? Like, we're gonna really see it at trial because it sounds like magically the videotapes are gonna get lost. Tyler Robinson's gonna get Epstein. All of this is gonna fade away, but we're gonna have experts that we're gonna say that the shoe and the DNA evidence that matched the killer. You know? And I was, like, sleeping, so, like, I had to get up to, like, make this video. So I'm tired. But it's that embarrassing, right, that I had to get up and I'm so now Steven is going around on all of the right wing podcast. Right? Anybody that they will take him, basically. And he's pitching the FBI slop narrative, and he's, like, trying to reconfirm it. When none of this entire investigation makes sense, none of the evidence the FBI has presented has made sense, specifically the 30 odd six. So yesterday, we played a video. In the 30 odd six video, this guy's we had, like, three different calibers of 30 odd six round, and he has a half inch thick steel plate. He has a meat, a big fat chunk of meat that's to stimulate the neck. Then behind it, he has a two liter bottle. And this bullet goes through the meat, through the steel plate, and then out the other side through the two liter. All of them, even the smallest 30 odd six round that the guy shot. So, I mean, there is absolutely not a chance in hell that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck with a 30 odd six at any distance. This guy was at a 150 yards. Tyler Robinson was allegedly in inside that. Charlie said it would have been blown off. Okay? So we can start that. Let's talk about the bullet. Let's talk about the video evidence that we have. Let's talk about the stuff that any normal investigation at this level would be presenting just to shut the people up. Like, you wanna earn the trust back of the American people. You wanna be the most transparent FBI in American history. How about you start with just, I don't know, releasing some video footage, and he's on video. They're like, it's gonna hurt the investigation. They're not gonna leak any of this information, but it's gonna hurt the investigation. What? It's video evidence. The guy literally assassinated Charlie Kirk. We all watched it. 3,000 people live seen it. There's 3,000 witnesses to watch what happened, and there's video evidence of you plotting this whole thing out and spending, like, four hours at the campus walking all around, up and down stairwells, in and out of parking garages. So just show us the video footage. Right? People have a gate. Right? The gate is like a fingerprint. So when you are walking, right, the movement of your legs as you walk and you separate between them, that is a gate. Security cameras all over the world, when the FBI is tracking and doing their shit, they're literally the AI is tracking your gate, the gap between your legs. So Tyler Robinson is walking all over this campus. So the CCTV footage that we're gonna see in trial, right, is gonna clearly show and dictate that, you know, Tyler Robinson is our guy. Right? The video footage of him climbing onto the roof, getting in the in the prone position, and then taking that shot, and then somehow within three seconds being up in less than three seconds being up in a full sprint across that roof, nowhere nobody's buying it. We're not gonna believe that there was cell phone geolocation data that you're tracking to, like, the exact bathroom spot. Right? You know, even when you yeah. I guess you can. You you say you lost your watch, you know, and find my iPhone, and it brings you brings you pretty damn close to it. But so, yeah, maybe they will be able to. But, yeah, I just find it I just find it comical at this point to expect that we're supposed to trust some expert. Like, the FBI, the people at bay that control our government and obviously blackmail the entire world and then sell politicians and assassinate presidents and, like, these people are pros at this. Right? They deep state they exist. They could never fake DNA evidence. Evidence. They They could could never never come up with some harebrained scheme like this and get some expert to lie and say that he tested this and it tested positive. Right? There's no way that that's possible, is it? They couldn't forge this data. The FBI, the CIA, the most powerful intelligence agency in the entire world, Mossad, couldn't forge any of this information, any of this evidence. Show us the CCTV footage. Let's talk about the bullet. Let's hear about this autopsy. Okay? Let's show us the videos of Tyler Robinson spending four hours at the crime scene. Okay? Because we haven't seen any of that, and this is slop.
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 8:47 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owens just quote tweeted Sam Parker’s thread and claimed she has enough evidence to burn the house down with the new evidence she uncovered pertaining to the Charlie Kirk investigation! https://t.co/MKBApaZ3De

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sam Parker retweeted the video I just made about Sam Parker’s report on the judge replacement and the Israel-based Google searches related to the search terms, which we covered in the last video. Sam Parker says, “breaking new Tyler Robinson trial.” Tony Gap, the judge selected to preside over the assassination trial, and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunen, were both subjected to unique Google searches from Israel’s IP addresses. We covered that in the last video. I’ll leave the link down below. Then Sam Parker tweets, “Candice, check out the receipts on the judges.” Candace Owens, in a retweet, says, “don’t worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world’s behalf.” “The things I’ve discovered in the past week are enough to burn the house down.” “Yes. Charlie was betrayed, and he was betrayed by everybody two weeks one week from now. So it’d be seven days.” “Candace Owens is gonna be back on our show live.” In the meantime, Candace Owens joins me, Sam Parker, and Maze as we fill the gap every weekday, Monday through Friday at five to six PM. On Monday, we’re going deep into Charlie Kirk’s security detail with an expert who has been studying this for six hours a day since every day since the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we’re gonna be bringing the heat on Monday. If you guys want to learn all about these nitty-gritty details, come join us. Linked to the X space and the previous post, and this post will all be linked down in the comments. We out. Peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you guys know the video I just made on the report that Sam Parker did on the judge and the replacing of the judge and the searching those search terms in Israel. Well, guess who just retweeted it, and Candice has something she wants to tell you. So Sam Parker says, breaking new Tyler Robinson trial. Tony Gap, the judge that was selected to preside over the assassination trial, and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunen, were both the subject to unique Google searches from Israel's IP addresses. So we covered that in the last video. I'll leave link down below. Then Sam Parker tweeted out and says, Candice, check out the receipts on the judges. That was twenty three minutes ago. Candace says, in a retweet, she says, don't worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world's behalf. The things I've discovered in the past week are enough to burn the house down. Yes. Charlie was betrayed, and he was betrayed by everybody two weeks one week from now. So it'd be seven days. Candace Owens is gonna be back on our show live. Okay? In the meantime, me and the legendary Sam Parker and the legendary Maze will be filling in that gap every weekday, Monday through Friday at five to 6PM. So Monday, we're gonna go deep into Charlie Kirk's security detail. We got an expert. This guy has been studying this for six hours a day since every day since the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we're gonna be bringing the heat on Monday. So if you guys wanna learn all about these nitty gritty details, come join us. Linked to the x space and the previous post, and this post will all be linked down in the comments. We out. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Tony Graf, the judge selected to preside over the Charlie Kirk assassination trial and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunnen, were both the subject of unique Google searches from israeli IP addresses before the assassination. https://t.co/bwpMfDDBCo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sam Parker presents a detailed thread alleging unusual activity around searches for judges connected to the Charlie Kirk assassination case. He notes a broad gag order in the case: once someone becomes a witness or the defense intends to use them, they are barred from speaking to anyone. Parker claims that Google searches on Israeli IP addresses targeted Utah judges who would preside over the Charlie Kirk murder case. Specifically, he cites two judges: Robert Lewin and Tony Gaff (referred to as Tony Gaffa in some passages). He asserts that Lewin and Gaff were uniquely searched from Israel prior to the assassination, with no similar searches from Utah before the event. Lewin retired on August 1, 2025, and Gaff assumed duties on August 4, 2025. Parker adds that Matteb Saeed, the special agent in charge of the Salt Lake City FBI field office, was removed around the same time. In his thread, Parker presents dates and screenshots indicating searches for Lewin in Israel on May 15, 2025, and for Gaff on July 26, 2025, with Utah searches absent before the assassination. He lists a timeline including Lewin’s retirement (08/01/2025) and Gaff’s swearing-in (08/04/2025), noting Gaff’s prior role as a special assistant to the US attorney in Washington, DC. He also mentions an official vacancy vacancy notice dated 07/17/2025, aligning with the retirement of Lewin and the appointment of Gaff by Governor Spencer Cox on 05/02/2025. Parker claims that Gaff was appointed to the Fourth District Court and that Cox praised him for “steady hand, strong ethics.” He emphasizes that neither judge was searched from DC or Utah addresses; searches reportedly occurred only from Israel and spanned 05/01/2025 to 10/19/2025 for Lewin and 01/25/2025 to 10/19/2025 for Gaff, with a Utah search for Gaff occurring once on September 21–27, 2025, about ten days after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He mentions Matteb Saeed’s removal being reported in the media on 08/05/2025 and describes the removal as part of a broader claim of high-ranking FBI uprooting of officials—asserting it disproportionately affected women and people of color. The narrative moves to Kash Patel, who allegedly claimed that the White House instructed him to fire agents who worked on investigations into President Trump. Parker cites a complaint in which Patel states he was told to remove agents to protect his own job, noting that those agents faced lawsuits and that Patel acknowledged they would lose in court. He describes an attempt to demote Matteb Saeed rather than terminate her, suggesting a preference to avoid court scrutiny. The thread references Stephen Miller, a White House aide, purportedly pressuring firings, and connections to Kash Patel’s actions regarding FBI personnel tied to Trump-related investigations. Parker concludes by returning to the gag order, claims of Israeli IP searches targeting judges who would oversee the Charlie Kirk case, and characterizes the sequence as suspicious coincidences, inviting followers to view receipts on his page. He ends with a provocative closing about accountability and political figures, asserting a link between White House pressure and the observed personnel changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your boy Sam Parker is back at it again. Absolute legend, guys. If you guys aren't following Bay Sam Parker and you guys are following along with the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation, there's very few people out there above, like, Candace Owens and, like, there's Sam Parker. Like, the level of research that this man has done independently of everybody else, it's absolutely mind blowing. And you're gonna wanna hear this, so staying tight. Alright. So Sam's done this investigation into who is searching these judges. So you know that there's this random crazy, like 3,000 person gag order and anybody that may be a witness or anybody that the defense or the prosecuting attorney wants to pull up onto the stand, anybody involved in this case whatsoever they automatically are hit with a gag order. The second that they become a witness or the second that the defense attorney wants to use them, boom. They can't speak to anybody, which is crazy in a case like this. So let's talk about these search results and who is searching for these judges in Israel. Like, why would anybody in Israel randomly be searching for judges in America, specifically in an area where somebody was just insassinated? Like, it doesn't make sense. So check this out. Stan says, breaking news. Tyler Robinson's trial. Tony Gaff, the judge that was selected to preside over the Charlie Kirk assassination trial, and the judge he replaced, Robert Lewin, were both the subject of unique Google searches from Israel's IP addresses before the assassination on July 26 and May 15, respectively. Neither was subject to any of these searches in Utah until after the assassination. So nobody in Utah was searching for these people, but lo and behold, they're being searched in Israel. So judge Lunen retired on August 1. Judge Gaffa assumed his duties on August 4. On or about the same day, Matib Syed, the special agent in charge of the SLC FBI field office was removed. Just a bunch of coincidence? Here's one source for next week. Okay. So he goes up here and he brings up these two new art news articles which say, new Utah judge takes on accused killer's death penalty case and Charlie Kirk's murder. And then here it goes on to say, governor Spencer Cox appoints Todi f Gaffa to the fourth district court. And it goes on and on. Okay. So it gets a little bit better. Okay. So here are the actual search terms where they're actually searching. You can see right here, it says, this is judge Robert Lewin, and then the location is Israel right here. It shows that Israel was searching them. And then watch, this will be deleted in the next week or two, so make sure you guys are taking screenshots along with me and following over on Sam Parker's page. He's got all the receipts. So here on May 15 in Israel, they were searching for Robert Lewin, and then here, Tony Gaff on July 26. So about, I don't know, May to September is what, about three months? July, August, September, so two months. Yeah. So within the two to three months prior to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, magically, Israel is randomly searching for judges that are gonna preside over where a assassination would take place. Kinda strange, don't you think? So he goes into tweet number or thread number two, and he says, judge Robert Lewin retired on 08/01/2025. He was replaced by judge Tony Gaffa, who was sworn in on August 4 after Gaffa was appointed by governor Spencer Cox on 05/02/2025. Also notable, Gaffa formerly worked as a special assistant to the US attorney in Washington DC. Weird how that works, isn't it? So here are the dates were for both judges that you guys can go through here and see that Sam's put all the receipts together for you guys so you don't have to really question anything. And then here is the official judicial whatever vacancy on 07/17/2025 and it goes on to say the exact date which was 08/01/2025. Blah blah blah blah. Okay. So here we go on again. Here's governor Spencer Cox appoints Tony F. Gather to the Fourth District. We had covered that earlier, but it's a little bit smaller. And by the filing the vacancy for the retirement of judge Robert Lunen. And okay. Here it says, when the Utah governor Spencer Cox appointed Gaffin to the fourth district court in May, he praised him as somebody who brings a steady hand, strong ethics, and the kind of judgment we count on in Utah's judiciary. Still, no one expected his first major assignment would be or would come so quickly after he was sworn in on 08/04/2025. And then it goes down to tell you that here he was special assistant US attorney in Washington DC. The swamp just never drains itself, does it? Okay. So Sam Parker goes on to say, neither judge was searched for from DC or Utah IP addresses before the assassination only from Israel IP addresses. So, again, here's Tony Gaffa, Robert Lewin. Location, Israel. Dates, 05/01/2025 to 10/19/2025. And then you could see here, the dates are 01/25 to 10/19/2025. District Of Columbia? Nope. No searches were there. Strange how that works, doesn't it? But in Utah, Tony Gaffa was searched one time on September 21 to September 27. What date? That's about ten days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Weird. Now, Matteb Saib Saeed? Saeed? However you say that name, removal from the SLC FBI field office was announced in the media on 08/05/2025. This is get it gets really strange here. So high ranking FBI job losses disproportionately hurt women and people of color. Leaders are undertaking an unprecedented campaign to force senior officials off the job. Now a lot of the FBI agents out there will tell you, this girl was trash. She was a DEI hire, blah blah blah blah blah. She had to go. Really? How many other directors of these field offices went exactly? How many all over across the country? Was it one, two, five, ten, or is it just one? I don't know. I really don't know, but I'm curious. How many of those FBI agents that were involved in the raid on Mar A Lago got fired? Wasn't one of them flying around Cash Patel's private jet until Kyle Sarifen kind of blew the roof off of that one, and then Cash was left with no other option but to kind of let that one go. But magically, we're gonna go to Utah. We're gonna get rid of some DEI hire that was actually I believe she served in the military too. And you think about, you've been in the FBI that long to make it to that position. Yeah. We'll just leave it at that. Okay. Anyways, so an unprecedented campaign by FBI leaders forced senior bureau officials out of their jobs. Has the district disproportionately hit women and people of color blah blah blah blah. In the most recent example, FBI leaders last week forced the resignation of a decorated female Pakistani American counterterrorism agent who was appointed in February to run the Salt Lake City, Utah field office. Was appointed in February. So she was appointed under the Trump administration, and then magically, out of nowhere, she's getting shit canned right before the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Am I the only one that something ain't sitting right here? Anyways, the special agent in charge in Salt Lake City, Matteb Saeed, is being forced out just six months after being appointed in February for reasons that, nobody's clear about. Right? So in six months, she was that bad? Wait. Were weren't they just praising Utah for all of the arrests and all these operation whatever Lone Ranger, operation Cash Patel dark six seven. I don't know. The source says that the associate deputy director Jay William River, who works for Bongino and Patel told Saeed that she wasn't a good fit for the office, which covers Utah, Idaho, and Montana. The sources said. He offered her a lower level job in the FBI's Huntsville, Alabama facility, but she has decided to retire. The source said, she did not respond to request for comment. Okay. So Sam goes on in this thread. He says, the day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated, the Guardian ran a story that the order to take action against the fired agents in early August came from the White House's aide, Stephen Miller. Oh, it just happens to be one of God's chosen people. Right? Nothing to see here. Someone who isn't in any Department of Justice or FBI chain of command. But what's interesting about that is Kash Patel admitted that he was actually forced to make these decisions if he wanted to keep his own job. Now, Kash acknowledged that the FBI would be sued over many of these firings and lose, yet they were willing to do it anyways. What? Pretty strange, isn't it? Now we get back to the case of Matab Saeed. She wasn't fired. She was offered an demotion. But why? This isn't black and white. The FBI was not afraid of firing these agents, getting sued for it, and losing. Why didn't they take that approach to Syed? Why didn't they just fire her too? Well, it's because they didn't want that level of her case going to court. They didn't want that level of scrutiny in her case. Did they not want it to go quietly and just disappear? No court, no case, no discovery, no scrutiny, no spotlight, folks. By the way, don't notice the ethnicity of the guy who wrote this story. Curiously, this particular article mentions nothing about Matab Saib. Why not? Did he not want us connecting Matteb Saib back to Stephen Miller? Was Miller behind the removal of her too? FBI officials sue Kash Patel over claims that they were fired for investigating Trump. Officials claim that the FBI director said that he had been instructed by the White House to fire agents who worked on the investigation into president Trump. Okay. So Cash Patel's orders to get rid of FBI agents in 2025 came from Stephen Miller. But let me let me pause there for a second. So you're telling me that that Trump was ordering the FBI to go after the agents that investigated him, but yet where's Chris Ray? Where's Merrick Garland? Where's literally the people that signed off on this? Where is the gosh damn accountability? How about doctor Fauci? Anybody? But we're gonna go fire some random fucking field agent from Utah. Okay. Let me just eat that slot, boys. So Cash Patel ordered to get rid of the agents. The complaint details an episode in which Patel allegedly told this girl that he had been instructed by the White House to fire any agents who worked on this investigation of Donald Trump. Patel explained that he had to fire the people his supervisors told him to fire because his ability to keep his own job depended on the removal of these agents who worked on any cases involving the president, the complaint says. Patel explained that there was nothing that he or Discworld could do to stop any of these firings because the FBI tried to put the president in jail and he hasn't forgotten about it. So Discworld stated that the summary of firings, Meier, would be illegal based on his military veteran status, and he would also violate the established FBI policy for adverse actions against personnel, the complaint says. Patel responded that Meier would be fired by Friday, August, whatever, '20 '25 and that there was nothing either Patel or Discworld could do, and they said that they wouldn't wouldn't be able to do anything to stop it. Okay? So Patel acknowledged that the FBI agents would be sued or the FBI would be sued and acknowledged that they would lose in court, the complaint says. It just goes on and on. Pressure from the White House aide Stephen Miller was to fire these agents. Bov, the complaint says, also told Discworld that he received pressure from the White House aide, Stephen Miller, to fire these agents en masse. And Sam went on to say, judge Tony Gaff has issued a gag order on all witnesses in the Charlie Kirk assassination trial, and he plays my video. So I'll throw this video in here for you guys to see. But ain't that some shit, folks? What would make anybody in Israel be searching for judges that are gonna sit over the investigation of Charlie Kirk's assassination? I'm sure this is just all random coincidence. Not like we've seen this in JFK, MLK, RFK, and any other high profile case that just seems to get swept under the rug. Eat that slot, boys. Be a good little Goyim. Pay your taxes. I'm out. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The Judge presiding over Tyler Robinson‘s trial has set an unprecedented gag order that has gagged every single whiteness that has been identified. https://t.co/AlZKyXwSKX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video host discusses Tyler Robinson’s gag order and argues that nobody is likely to receive a phone call from Tyler Robinson. He says he reached out to Elizabeth Lane, a journalist trying to help Robinson obtain a new attorney, and she told him “absolutely not” that anyone will get a phone call with Robinson. He references Project Constitution claiming “exclusive,” and describes various sensational elements: a “tyler robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast,” a “blurry ghost on video,” a “phone call connected after seven minutes,” and an “audio only clip.” He asserts that Robinson identifies him, then faces “stone walls,” with only family or friends attempting to rally him, and that there are “attorney gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else.” He likens the situation to Oswald “pinned in silence forever,” and expresses fear for Robinson’s wife and a lack of say in his own defense, as part of the alleged setup. The host acknowledges some agreement with others about not being able to secure a new attorney and the gag order being unprecedented, but maintains that no one will randomly get a phone call to Robinson. He speculates that Robinson and his family are involved and dismisses the situation as conspiratorial. He mentions the possibility that Robinson will not appear in a courtroom, suggesting a scenario where Robinson is harmed and removed from the case, referencing Epstein, and humorously posits Robinson might be in Israel afterward. The transcript then shifts to an excerpt from a separate segment where an attorney explains gag orders and their scope. Tyler Robinson’s latest court hearing is described as brief; Robinson did not attend in person, listening from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focus on evidence from the crime scene, and a formal appearance was entered while rights to a preliminary hearing were not waived. Judge Tony Graff issues a gag order to prevent anyone involved from talking about the case to avoid pretrial publicity in a high-profile matter. There is discussion about “thousands of people” potentially affected, noting a large number of witnesses identified or to be identified. The court intends that as witnesses become known, the information will be conveyed to abide by the gag order. The judge emphasizes protecting Robinson’s constitutional rights and the victim’s rights. Outside the courtroom, lawyers declined comment. Robinson is expected back for an in-person hearing on October 30. The host returns to skepticism, claiming Robinson was on campus with multiple cameras, detailing alleged rapid movements and actions during the incident. He argues Robinson will not get a fair trial, predicting his death in a manner akin to “Epstein,” JFK, or MLK vibes, and suggests involvement by someone connected to Israel. He concludes that the case will end without a courtroom appearance and frames the whole narrative as a “joke.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanna make this video, and I wanna talk a little bit about Tyler Robinson's gag order and why I don't think anybody's actually gonna get a phone call to Tyler Robinson. So I reached out to Elizabeth Lane. She's the journalist. She's actually trying to get Tyler Robinson a new attorney. And I showed her this video, and I was like, is it possible that somebody's getting a phone call with Tyler Robinson? She's like, absolutely not. So so Project Constitution says exclusive. Tyler Robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast. Blurry ghost on video. Handlers threatening him to stay quiet. Video call connected after seven minutes, but Tyler's face blurred like a frosted ghost. Just a set shadowy orange blob. Audio only clip below. He IDs me, then stone walls. Only family slash friends right now tried rallying him on the army for fighting for truth plus commentary cash. Hangs up. Boom. Ten minute call. Mostly silent. Attorney gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else. Like Oswald, post Kennedy hit. Pinned in silence forever. I fear for Tyler's wife. And what the fuck? No say in his own defense, this scream set up. I agree with a lot of this. You know? Like, I agree with this the fact that we can't get him a new attorney and some shit like that. Well, people are actually trying to get a new attorney to him. And for some reason, the gag order shit is unprecedented. We've never seen it. But I just don't think that anybody's actually gonna randomly get a phone call into Tyler. If anything, I think Tyler's in on this. His family's in on this. None of this makes sense, and it screams conspiracy theory. I don't think Tyler Robinson is actually gonna see it to a courtroom. I think we they're gonna Epstein him and then obviously put him on a gurney and roll him out the back door and let him go on his merry way. He'll probably be over in Israel kicking it with Epstein, but I digress. I want you to take a listen to this. The attorney speaking or the the news explaining these type of gag orders and what these gag orders actually are and how many people are actually gagged involved in this investigation. Check this out. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson's latest court hearing was brief, but some interesting things did happen, including one issue that could impact thousands of people here in Utah. Speaker 2: Good morning. Court is now in session. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson was not present for the hearing. Instead, he listened in from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on upcoming issues like evidence from the crime scene. Speaker 3: There is a a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say the least. Speaker 1: His lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to waive his right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graff has issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it. It's to avoid pretrial publicity, already a big problem in a case with massive media exposure involving a high profile figure like Charlie Kirk, but the judge wants to ensure a fairer trial for Robinson. It's also brought up a big issue involving thousands of people. Speaker 3: We're seeking some clarification with respect to the phrase all witnesses, your honor. There are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified, that will likely be used in the state's case. This occurred in front of two to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University. So we're in the process of identifying those witnesses. And so those individuals are presently unknown right now. Speaker 2: The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially, many witnesses, and so it's not the expectation that you would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known. Speaker 1: The judge made it clear he wants to ensure Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected as well as the rights of the victim. Speaker 2: Counsel, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, We must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither mister Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Speaker 1: Any comment? Outside court, lawyers declined to comment. Speaker 3: Any comment? Not today. Not today. Thanks, though. Speaker 1: Robinson will be back here in court in person for another hearing on October 30. Speaker 0: So you see what I'm saying? What do you mean a fair trial? Tyler Robinson was on camera on what? 50, maybe even a 100 different cameras every if he was actually there every second that the man was on campus, including him going through the stairwell, grabbing his rifle out of the bushes, getting up onto the roof, hopping over the railing, getting into the prone position, sprinting across the roof. And then after he fired that shot, somehow magically within three seconds, the dude was up in a full sprint across the roof. And then after he went and ran all the way about a mile and went and dropped off his weapon at some in the some magical drop spot in the woods, then he had to somehow sneak back to campus, get his vehicle, and then drive, and then make it to a coffee shop that was about a mile and a half away and do all that in under twenty minutes. But trust me, Tyler Robinson's gonna get a fair trial. He's gonna get a fair shake. Now if we talk about it, we might damage that investigation. We might wreck his chances of having a free and fair trial here in America. Tyler Robinson ain't make it to a courtroom, dude. They are gonna smoke this dude. They're gonna Epstein him. Nobody's buying it. Nobody's believing oh, sorry. Jack Posobic is still buying it. That guy still believes it, obviously. And all the people that go on podcasts and do interviews with him as well because, yeah, there's that. Sham, dude. This is all one big joke. Dude, this is gonna Epstein him. This is gonna be, like, just like JFK. It has JFK vibes written all over it. MLK, in comes the magical person, most likely related or connected directly to Israel. Takes a shot, takes out Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson's dead case closed. That's how it's gonna end up. We already know it. It's a joke.
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 6:37 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination is going to come out one way or another. Just like the truth about the JFK assassination is coming out and there is nothing Jack Posobiec can do to stop it! https://t.co/hKfI6rAbCf

Video Transcript AI Summary
If you're new to this whole just waking up to how much Israel controls our government thing, you're thinking to yourself, Ryan, Israel would never assassinate JFK, not a US president. Right? They're our greatest ally. And then I would tell you, well, have you ever listened to a gentleman by the name of William Cooper? He was also assassinated by Israel. This gentleman wrote a book called Behold a Pale Horse. You guys have probably seen that the pope just received a pale horse. Everybody's talking about a pale horse, but you might have missed this clip from William Cooper. He was the one who the first one to actually get the original footage from a CIA whistleblower that actually showed who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. The clips that we are seeing from the media always specifically started at a specific point, and part of the frame was cropped out. But it wasn't till William Cooper released this video that we really started to ask a lot of questions. Check this out. Said that the assassin was the driver in the car in which he was riding in Dallas on that day, and it was plainly visible in a film with help from the public. Now you brought that film with you. Let's take a look at that if we can. Here's the film. Go ahead and narrate this for us, Will. Well, it took me sixteen years to find this film because it has really been withheld, and what you're seeing here is the motorcade on Elm Street passing in front of the Book Depository Building. Kennedy has been shot in the throat, and Jacqueline is pulling him toward her trying to comfort him, and she's in shock. At this time, you see the driver turn around with a pistol in his left hand firing over his right shoulder and shoots the president directly in the head. You need a repeat of it. Yeah. The weapon watch the driver. His name is William Greer. He was, in fact, a secret service agent. The weapon is a an electrically operated gas powered assassination pistol built built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency. You don't see any puff of smoke any from That's correct. Because you think is a pistol there in the right hand corner, lower right hand corner. It is a say? Well, it's an it's an air operated pistol. It's pneumatic. And it actually fired an exploding pellet, which injected shellfish toxin into the president's brain so that if the actual explosion of the pellet itself did not kill him, the toxin would. Now did you read all of this Yes. In in the documents? Yes. And that's why, his brain was switched for another brain in transit between Parkland, Hospital in Dallas and Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington DC. Wait. Wait. Wait. What type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK? And that was in what? Sixty three ish time frame? No way our intelligence agencies have those type of weapons that could have been used to assassinate Charlie Kirk, could they? Maybe we should just listen to Jack Posobic and all those goons that are carrying water for this administration. Time will tell.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're new to this whole just waking up to how much Israel controls our government thing, you're thinking to yourself, Ryan, Israel would never assassinate JFK, not a US president. Right? They're our greatest ally. And then I would tell you, well, have you ever listened to a gentleman by the name of William Cooper? He was also assassinated by Israel. This gentleman wrote a book called Behold a Pale Horse. You guys have probably seen that the pope just received a pale horse. Everybody's talking about a pale horse, but you might have missed this clip from William Cooper. He was the one who the first one to actually get the original footage from a CIA whistleblower that actually showed who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. The the clips that we are seeing from the media always specifically started at a specific point, and part of the frame was cropped out. But it wasn't till William Cooper released this video that we really started to ask a lot of questions. Check this out. Speaker 1: Said that the assassin was the driver in the car in which he was riding in Dallas on that day, and it was plainly visible in a film with help from the public. Speaker 2: Now you brought that film with you. Let's take a look at that if we can. Here's the film. Go ahead and narrate this for us, Will. Speaker 1: Well, it took me sixteen years to find this film because it has really been withheld, and what you're seeing here is the motorcade on Elm Street passing in front of the Book Depository Building. Kennedy has been shot in the throat, and Jacqueline is pulling him toward her trying to comfort him, and she's in shock. At this time, you see the driver turn around with a pistol in his left hand firing over his right shoulder and shoots the president directly in the head. Speaker 2: You need a repeat of it. Yeah. Speaker 1: The weapon watch the driver. His name is William Greer. He was, in fact, a secret service agent. The weapon is a an electrically operated gas powered assassination pistol built built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency. You don't see any puff of smoke any from That's correct. Speaker 2: Because you think is a pistol there in the right hand corner, lower right hand corner. Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 2: It is a say? Speaker 1: Well, it's an it's an air operated pistol. It's pneumatic. And it actually fired an exploding pellet, which injected shellfish toxin into the president's brain so that if the actual explosion of the pellet itself did not kill him, the toxin would. Now did you read all of this Yes. In in the documents? Yes. And that's why, his brain was switched for another brain in transit between Parkland, Hospital in Dallas and Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington DC. Speaker 0: Wait. Wait. Wait. What type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK? And that was in what? Sixty three ish time frame? No way our intelligence agencies have those type Speaker 2: of weapons that could have Speaker 0: been used to assassinate Charlie Kirk, could they? Maybe we Speaker 2: should just listen to Jack Posobic and all those goons that Speaker 0: are carrying water for this administration. Time will tell.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If you get onto a podcast and have the opportunity to interview people like Jack Posobiec or Andrew Kolvet and you attempt to force feed us slop, you will instantly lose our trust and respect. https://t.co/63jOjsliu0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration with how podcasts interview figures like Jack Posobiac, Benny Johnson, Andrew Colvord, and Turning Point USA, accusing them of feeding narratives and avoiding obvious questions. He mentions wanting CCTV footage and Turning Point material, and challenges the idea that someone could be shot in the neck with a 30-06 from 150 yards. He references the “magic man of steel” and questions the official narrative around Charlie Kirk’s filming or assassination, calling out perceived manipulation by right-wing media and “controlled opposition.” He urges viewers to follow Intel Skiff, praising him for uncovering information, and asserts that the 30-06 could not have left an exit wound consistent with a neck wound in Charlie Kirk’s case. He insists supporters seek the truth and accuses media figures of fabrication. Speaker 1 then describes a physical test designed to test the claims. He lists the ammunition: an 80-grain ELDX for 22 Creedmoor, a 178-grain ELDX for 30-06, and a 150-grain FMJ for 30-06. The setup includes a pork shoulder about four-and-a-half inches thick taped to a steel plate, with two-liter bottles positioned behind the steel. The test is conducted at 150 yards. They record shots with the 30-06 and then the 22 Creedmoor, intending that if the 22 Creedmoor fails to produce a negative wound, there would be a negative wound from the 30-06. For the 178-grain 30-06 ELDX: the pork shoulder is described as completely ripped through, with the neck represented by the pork shoulder, and the steel plate also being penetrated, followed by an exit wound on the two-liter bottle. They assert the 30-06 blew straight through the neck/shoulder mock, through the steel, and through the Coke bottle behind it, demonstrating a complete through-and-through. They emphasize that the evidence shows the steel plate and two-liter bottle sustained exit wounds, supporting their narrative that a 30-06 at 150 yards would penetrate in this setup. For the 150-grain FMJ 30-06: they report it went through the mock neck and through the steel, with an exit wound observed on the two-liter, again indicating a through-and-through. They then switch to the 22 Creedmoor: the shooter’s wife fires the 22 Creedmoor from the same elevated position. The 22 Creedmoor is described as smaller with less energy than the 30-06, yet it completely penetrates the neck mock and the steel, with an exit on the two-liter bottle. The testers point out that the 22 Creedmoor, in this setup, penetrated both the neck-mock and steel at 150 yards, undermining the claim that a 30-06 would be stopped by a neck at that distance. The overall takeaway, according to Speaker 1, is that both the neck mock and steel behind it were penetrated by the 22 Creedmoor, and that the 30-06 would likewise penetrate in this configuration, challenging the notion that the official narrative about Charlie Kirk’s injury could be accurate. The video underscores the comparison between the two calibers and highlights the steel plate as a decisive barrier in the demonstration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in this one video, this man with a long rifle is going to take a shot with a 30 odd six and blow through an entire plate of steel at a 150 yards. So when you guys see other people on podcasts, you see them interviewing people like Jack Posobic or Benny Johnson or maybe some turning point higher executives like Andrew Colvold. And you see them just throwing softball questions at them when we want answers to the obvious. Right? We wanna know where's the CCTV feeded. We wanna know where's the turning point footage. We wanna know how is it possible that somebody took a 30 odd six round to the neck. What about the magic man of steel? What about that narrative? But you get on these podcasts and you feed us some geolocation data or maybe Tyler Robinson was this or maybe Tyler Robinson was that. It's humiliating. You act like we are low well, I'm low IQ, but the rest of our audience, they're probably higher intellects and they're all putting it together. Right? And if my low low IQs can put it together and we see you on there putting from the rough just giving hand jobs talking about whatever narrative it is that you guys wanna craft with the turning point team. It's humiliating, and we're not buying it. So just stop. White your head because you look like controlled opposition at this point. We're sick of it. We're sick of being tired of being fed absolute lies. And then watching the people on the right wing because they have access, So you're what? Just gonna bend over and just approve of their bullshit narrative when not a single person in America believes that it's true. Just stop. Okay? It's humiliating. But do me a favor really quick. First, go down in the comments and follow the intel skip. This man is a legend. Without these videos and the work that this man puts in finding this stuff and putting it on our radar, it's off the hook, man. We gotta give this guy a follow. Let's bump up his follower account. Thanks to the intel skiff for finding this. So he says, the 30 odd six nail in the coffin, Charlie Kirk assassination video that proves that the official narrative is complete false. Okay? He says you can continue to stay naive or stand up for the truth and what is right. All we want is the truth, which is exactly the point. This man's at an elevated position from a 150 yards away, three different types of 30 odd six rounds, a pork shoulder to stimulate the human neck, a full steel plate, which is probably a half inch thick, and a two liter or two two liter bottles of soda. All three different types of 36 rounds goes completely through the stimulated human neck, pork shoulder, the steel plate, and the two liter bottle of soda. There is 100% no way that Charlie Kirk was shot with a 30 odd six round from an elevated position at a 150 yards, and the bullet didn't go through him and caused a tremendous amount of damage, including a a drastic exit wound. Okay? This is why, ladies and gentlemen, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative and what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we must find out why. Okay? And this video is from c r forty two hunting. Okay? This is it. So quit going on these podcasts and bringing people like Jack Posobic on and Charlie Kirk's buddies and some of the people at Turning Point USA and trying to force feed a slop. We're sick of it. We're done being humiliated, and we think you guys are fucking in on it at this point. Speaker 1: In this video, we'll be running an 80 grain ELDX 22 Creedmoor, a 178 grain ELDX 30 I six, and a 150 grain FMJ 30 I six. Alright. So here's our setup. We got the pork shoulder, which is about four and a half inches thick. We got this taped to a piece of steel. So instead of trying to do a video where we got another bone behind it or something else, we're going straight steel. We got the pork shoulder. We got the steel, and then we got these two liters behind it because we're gonna be 150 yards away when we take this shot. So we do a shot with the 30 I six, and we got another another one set up here. We'll do a shot with the 22 Creedmoor. So if the 22 Creedmoor blows through this and we get a negative wound, there's no way that we wouldn't get a negative wound from a 30 I six. So we're set up back at a 150 yards, take these shots, see what happens. Here's a closer look at the rounds we'll be using for this test. Be sure to stick around to the end of the video because that's when we show the damage from the 22 Creedmoor. Up first is a 178 grain ELDX round 30 I six. And here's our pork shoulder completely ripped through blew it apart. Yep. There's a it just blew straight through the neck in air quotes. And our spine, our piece of steel, it blew right through that, and we know it blew through because we got an exit wound on the two liters. So, we got our pork shoulder, which represents our neck, and we have a real piece of steel, not a Charlie Kirk's neck of steel. It blew through the real piece of steel, Then it went through a two liter. We know that because we got an exit wound on the two liter. Alright. Next, we'll take a shot with a 150 grain four metal jacket round. This is an FMJ round. Alright. So here's our shot with the FMJ round. This is a $150 FMJ. So it went through our our mock neck here. Yeah. It had yeah. There you go. So it went through. Here's our exit. Yep. Nice. And we know it also went through our piece of steel. So, again, the narrative there it is over there. The narrative that a human neck, which this was our mock neck, would get hit with the 30 I six with this full metal jacket or a hunting ground. It obliterated the bottom. Yeah. And then go through a literal piece of steel, not a a neck, not a spine, like a literal piece of steel. This blew through a piece of steel after going through this neck from a 150 yards away. And there's our proof in the pudding. That's why we put these behind to Clean make sure through and through the shot. Yeah. And that's what the FMJ. So that way we could tell it went through the neck, went through a piece of steel, not a human spine, and then it blew through the Coke bottle. So, again, guys, the narrative that Charlie Kirk could get hit from a 150 yards away with the 30 out six round, be it FMJ or a 100 ground. We just shot this with a $150 FMJ round. It blew straight through our pork shoulder, blew through a literal piece of steel, and then blew up our coke bottles to give us our exits. And now for the moment of truth, we'll switch. I'll let my wife take the shower to 22 Creedmoor. If this 22 Creedmoor blows through this still at a 150 yards away, there's no way you can convince me that a 30 I six would have been stopped by Charlie Kirk's neck. Check out the socks. We shot, drilled it, 150 yards from the elevated position. 22 Creedmoor, which is a lot smaller, lot less energy than 30 I six. It completely blew through this neck in air quotes, this pork shoulder. And what was behind it is a piece of steel. How about you bang that with your your your knuckles a couple of times? So it went through the pork shoulder, which represents the neck, and then went through a real piece of steel. It went through the steel, which is why we have this action back here on the two liter. There's the exit one from the two liter. All this was with the puny little 22 Creedmoor compared to a '30 I six.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If Tyler Robinson was really the man who assassinated Charlie Kirk. He would be on 50+ CCTV videos. I don’t need geo location data when I literally have every second of Tyler Robinson being on campus recorded on high resolution Arlington security cameras. https://t.co/CO8MUvbcFt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stephen Gardner argues that the smoking gun will be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle, asserting that DNA would be on the trigger, but geolocation is needed to implicate Tyler Robinson. He questions relying on geolocation data when video evidence exists, noting CCTV footage should show Tyler Robinson’s movements: entering the parking lot, walking through the garage, onto the roof, under the bridge, into the Losey Building, and more. He criticizes the need for experts and geolocation, saying that if Kesh Patel picked up a screwdriver at the crime scene, it would not necessarily hurt the case, and questions how geolocation could be the smoking gun after a murder broadcast on live TV. He adds a personal jab about growing up in a trailer and dismisses experts, contrasting with the video footage that he believes should be sufficient. Ryan Mehta introduces the discussion about cell phone tracking and forensic geofencing data, comparing it to methods used in January 6 to determine people’s exact locations on the steps or lawn. He asks what will be found in this case regarding Tyler Robinson and the text messages between him and Lance Twigg, questioning whether Twigg was in Southern Utah or in Orem. He states that investigators could determine if Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area and track whether the messages were sent from Orem. The main point, according to him, is that the forensic data would reveal whether Tyler Robinson knew terrain details not associated with a student at the school, and whether the murder could have been planned from Google Maps. Speaker Joe Scott Morgan, cited by Mehta, notes that they will be able to track Tyler Robinson’s movements from eight hundredth Street through tunnels, around the Losey Building, up stairs to the roof, from the roof to the edge, the shot, then the escape into the woods, and mentions conspiracy videos claiming he was seen on a cafe’s security system. Mehta mentions conspiracy theories about how he could kill Charlie Kirk and be in his car twenty minutes later, arguing that a murderer’s behavior could vary. He claims the FBI tracked him to a location after the crime, identifying him at Cedar City Maverick gas station at 07:15 AM, noting card swipes and phone activity to show home visits, interactions with Lance, and visits to his parents. The belief is that phone calls, texting, and other data would tie Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, addressing doubts about trusting the FBI and the role of geotracking as the potential smoking gun.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's your favorite trailer park shit talking dude with a great bond and a fucking foul mouth. Back at it again to serve you your daily dose of swap from Real America's Voice. Your boy, Stephen Gardner, Steven Gardner is live with Jack Buzovic trying to tell you and convince you, America, America that the smoking gun is going to be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle on his rifle. Right? Like, I'm sorry. You steal my car and commit a crime. Well, chances you're gonna find my DNA in that vehicle. Right? It's my gun. Obviously, you're gonna find my DNA on the trigger of it, but I digress. So now we're gonna have to trust some expert who's gonna get the magical geolocation data because it would be impossible for Tyler Robinson to be in on this, and this need to be one big government conspiracy where Tyler Robinson didn't actually take that shot. But I think the the CCTV video that would have shown Tyler Robinson, I don't know, pulling into the parking lot, getting out of his vehicle, walking through the parking garage, getting onto the roof, walking under the bridge, going through the low seat building, all of the video evidence. And that's really clear. That's guys are, well, we don't wanna hurt this investigation. We don't want to. Dude, when you're going in front of a jury, right, their job is to or your attorney's job is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, did this person commit the crime or did they not? When you were on video footage, 20 different videos. Right? I don't need your geolocation data. I don't need your DNA. I have your video. Right? So if Kesh Patel went and, I don't know, picked up a screwdriver at the crime scene and he wasn't supposed to be there, is it really gonna hurt the case? How? How is it possibly going to hurt the case when you've committed a murder? You assassinated somebody on live TV in front of the entire world, and now we're supposed to believe that the geolocation data is gonna be the smoking gun. What's wrong with this? And sorry. I'm covered in sawdust from head to toe. Some of us have to do manual labor unlike some of these other punks out there. We didn't grow up with a golden spoon in our mouth. We live in a fucking trailer. Okay? These smucks out here. And, like, I'm fucking nobody, and I'm thinking going, this sounds like a load of shit. I don't know about you guys, but I'm not gonna trust another expert. Right? How many experts did we hear from in the JFK assassination? How about the MLK? How about the RFK? How about nine eleven? How about COVID nineteen? Are you guys sick and fucking tired of hearing from the gosh damn experts yet? Because I sure the fuck am. Show us the gosh damn CCTV video that shows Tyler Robinson walking all across the campus, getting onto the roof, getting into his car, running across the neighborhoods because all you've given us is fucking slop, and I ain't buying it. My name is Ryan Mehta. Check out this slop from Jack Posobic. Speaker 1: About the cell phone tracking, that forensic cell phone tracking geofencing data. We know the same exact method of tracking individuals was used in January 6. They were tracking, did someone go onto the steps? Did they go in? Were they on the lawn? Where were they exactly? And we know that investigators using cell phone data can do this. What did you find regarding that data in this case? Speaker 2: So, we're gonna know with, great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages that many of us have questions about, whether those were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, was Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or was he also in Orem? All of that is going to come out. But the main thing is people are saying, okay. How would he have known based on this weird terrain, not being a student at the school? How would he have known this? Because I don't believe you could have planned this murder from Google Maps. So they're going to know based on his cell phone, pathway whether he went on the day before, a couple of weeks before. They'll be able to track all of that. Now I was told from expert, Joseph Scott, that they're going to be able to track him from 8 Hundredth Street down through the tunnel, up around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, run into the woods. And then I started seeing all of these conspiracy videos that they were able to find him on a little cafe's, security system. You can barely see his car, but you can see it. And you had all these conspiracy people saying, how does a guy kill Charlie Kirk? And twenty minutes later, he's, in his car in a parking lot. That's not consistent with what a murderer would do. Well, you don't know how a murderer thinks. Right? He might be sitting in that car amped up on adrenaline. But how did how did the cafe owner know that he was caught on his security camera? Because unless somebody breaks in, you don't just go review, you know, twenty four hours worth of video footage. It's because the FBI tracked him to that location. The next morning, 07:15AM, Cedar City Maverick gas station. How do they know it's him? He swipes a credit card, and they follow his phone. They know when he goes home. They know if he goes to visit Lance, when he goes over to his parents. They've got all of it, the phone calls, the texting, everything. So, this forensic expert, basically, Joseph Scott Morgan, he shared with me that next to the gun, the cell phone data is going to be the the thing that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on that building. And right now, there's a lot of doubt. Oh, I don't know if I can trust the FBI. Well, that that, geotracking, that geo
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 5:31 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Did Nick Fuentes just admit that Israel killed Charlie Kirk? https://t.co/lWl1qq5O4u

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: welcomes Nick Fuentes, claiming “the king’s coming back to get his crown,” and accuses Nick of saying Israel took out Charlie Kirk. He says in this video Nick will detail how desperate Israel is becoming. He argues Israel is acting desperate regardless of APAC, influencers, or propaganda, and suggests a false flag terrorist attack is coming. He mentions Laura Loomer and Randy Fine in connection with this idea, calling their collaboration “rock bottom,” and says this will be explored further in another video, asking viewers to check this video from Nick and share thoughts. Speaker 1: reflects on Netanyahu’s near two-decade tenure and the broader arc of the last 25–30 years—the war on terror, Middle East dynamics, rise of Laikud, and neocons—as if the era is sunsetting. He suggests Netanyahu may be out if the current war ends and his successor cannot keep the coalition together. He notes a less centralized media environment and worries about how desperate “they” will become. He speculates that if they are losing in debates and soft power, censorship, and suppression, they may resort to total chaos or crisis operations. He questions what losing would look like and believes the next six months will reveal how desperate they are. Speaker 2: uses an analogy of an abusive relationship, saying that when a manipulator senses someone trying to leave, that is the most dangerous time, implying Netanyahu’s situation could be similarly dangerous if he tries to leave or save face. He emphasizes the need to manage the situation and “leave the door open” for Netanyahu to declare victory or save face. He recalls canceling Rogan during COVID as an example of a backlash and questions what their audience would do next if a major platform or voice is taken out, suggesting it’s not clear whether listeners would simply return to mainstream outlets. Overall themes: a narrative of Israel and its supporters growing desperate; potential for false flags or crisis actions; political instability around Netanyahu’s tenure and coalition; the media landscape’s fragmentation; strategic considerations about exits and face-saving for leaders; and the uncertainty of audience reaction after influential cancellations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There he is. That's our boy. The king's coming back to get his crown, the legendary Nick Fuentes. But mister Red Pill's Joker Q army over here says Nick admits that Israel took out Charlie Kirk. Now in this video, he's gonna get in-depth and detail about how desperate Israel is becoming. And I think it's crazy to think about what might be coming next year for America because everybody except for Jack Posobic and Benny Johnson can see right through the FBI's bullshit. It's kinda bizarre that they claim to be Charlie Kirk's best friends and their closest allies, but yet they're literally pissing all over his grave. But I digress from that. Nick makes a very good point. What is Israel willing to do? They're so desperate no matter what they do, no matter what APAC does, no matter what influencers they buy, no matter what propaganda campaign they run, no matter how they try to spin it, it's just digging their grave deeper and deeper and deeper. So the question we should be asking is, what comes next? False flag terrorist attack. We already know it. And they're gonna be using Laura Loomer who's going on who's having Randy Fine. And we talk about rock bottom. Right? This is rock bottom. Laura Loomer and Randy Fine. If you find yourself sitting there actually listening to a Laura Loomer, Fine podcast, you know you've hit rock bottom, folks. But we will save that for another video. Check this video out from Nick. Let me know what you think. Speaker 1: It it becomes almost scary because Netanyahu's been in power for almost two decades. And in a sense, it's like this is sort of a modern situation. The war on terror, The Middle East, Netanyahu, the the ascendancy of Laikud, the neocons. This is like the past twenty five, thirty years, and it seems to sort of be sunsetting. Like Netanyahu, if this war ends, for better, for worse, he's gonna be out. And he will not whoever his successor is will not be able to keep the coalition together as well as he did. So maybe their influence diminishes there. The media environment is not centralized anymore, so they don't influence that either. In the last legs of whatever this period can be called, that this go for broke moment, what scares me is how desperate they're going to get. And I think that's where it maybe it makes sense they killed Charlie Kirk because there's some recognition they are that desperate. Like, is that is a desperate hour for them when they're losing absolutely everybody isolated. Isolated. They're They're not not winning winning the the debates. Debates. They can't win it with the soft power, censorship, suppression, the rest of it. Do they then resort to total chaos, crisis, you know, these kinds of operations? That, you know, because it's sort of like the emperor has no clothes. Like you said, in our lifetimes, we've never seen something like this. Can they lose? Will they tolerate losing? What does that actually look like? And I think that's going to be resolved in the next like six months. So it's gonna be kinda freaky. Speaker 2: Yeah. It's like, the example I use is that they say, like, when a woman in an abusive relationship tries to leave the husband, that's the most dangerous time. Like, that's when he might kill you. When you try to leave. Even though it's the right thing to do, you know. It's like the that is the most dangerous time. And so you do I mean, I think it's something we should all be kind of aware of is like how do you manage that situation exactly? And, you know, you always kind of wanna even in these really awful situations, you wanna kind of leave the door open in a way like you you know, you you have to find a way for Netanyahu to be able to declare victory or whatever and say, you know, save face to stop kinda doing what he's doing. But it is look, it's it's like you said, there's just no you know, I remember thinking this when they were really trying to cancel Rogan during the COVID stuff because he was, like, heroically telling the truth about it. And I remember even thinking you're like, so what let's say this works. You get Joe what do you think? All his listeners are going back to Don Lemon? Like, whether they take you out, they take me out, whatever. Do you think all the people we talk to or what's their next step? Like, it's not like they're going back in into the matrix or whatever.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If Tyler Robinson was really the man who assassinated Charlie Kirk. He would be on 50+ CCTV videos. I don’t need geo location data when I literally have every second of Tyler Robinson being on campus recorded on high resolution Arlington security cameras. https://t.co/9hgxYfIStx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stephen Gardner and Jack Buzovic argue that the smoking gun will be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle. They say, essentially, you steal my car and commit a crime, you’ll likely find my DNA in the vehicle and on the trigger, so now we’re going to trust some expert to provide magical geolocation data. They question how Tyler Robinson could be involved and suggest this should be a single, big government conspiracy if he didn’t actually take the shot. They insist CCTV video would show Tyler Robinson moving through the parking garage, onto the roof, and through various locations, and that the investigation should not avoid showing the video. They ask how a juror would be convinced without video footage when there are twenty different videos, and whether geolocation data could hurt the case when a murder has been committed. They complain about having to trust another expert and mention past high-profile investigations. They demand to see CCTV video showing Tyler Robinson walking across the campus, onto the roof, getting into his car, running through neighborhoods, because all that has been presented is “slop.” Ryan Mehta introduces this segment as a critique of the presented evidence. Speaker 1 (questioning the forensic approach) asks about cell phone tracking and geofencing data, noting that the same method was used in January 6 to determine who was on the steps or on the lawn. They ask what was found regarding that data in this case. Speaker 2 responds that the case will reveal with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area and whether the texts that many have questions about were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, and whether Lance Twigg was in Southern Utah or in Orem. The main point is that people are asking how he could have known given the terrain and that Google Maps could not have allowed planning of the murder. They say the data will show paths, including whether he went the day before or weeks before, and will track all of that. Joseph Scott Morgan told them they would be able to track him from 8 Hundredth Street down through the tunnel, up around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, run into the woods. They mention conspiracy videos claiming he was spotted at a cafe on security footage; some claimed the cafe owner saw him on security cameras, while others claimed it wasn’t consistent with a murderer’s behavior. They argue the FBI tracked him to that location, and that the next morning at 07:15 AM, a Cedar City Maverick gas station records his credit card use and follows his phone, his movements home, visits to Lance, and visits to his parents, with all phone calls, texts, and other data available. The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, asserts that next to the gun, the cell phone data will be the thing that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on that building, and there is doubt among some about trusting the FBI. The discussion ends with the assertion that geotracking will provide the crucial link.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's your favorite trailer park shit talking dude with a great bond and a fucking foul mouth. Back at it again to serve you your daily dose of swap from Real America's Voice. Your boy, Stephen Gardner, Steven Gardner is live with Jack Buzovic trying to tell you and convince you, America, America that the smoking gun is going to be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle on his rifle. Right? Like, I'm sorry. You steal my car and commit a crime. Well, chances you're gonna find my DNA in that vehicle. Right? It's my gun. Obviously, you're gonna find my DNA on the trigger of it, but I digress. So now we're gonna have to trust some expert who's gonna get the magical geolocation data because it would be impossible for Tyler Robinson to be in on this, and this need to be one big government conspiracy where Tyler Robinson didn't actually take that shot. But I think the the CCTV video that would have shown Tyler Robinson, I don't know, pulling into the parking lot, getting out of his vehicle, walking through the parking garage, getting onto the roof, walking under the bridge, going through the low seat building, all of the video evidence. And that's really clear. That's guys are, well, we don't wanna hurt this investigation. We don't want to. Dude, when you're going in front of a jury, right, their job is to or your attorney's job is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, did this person commit the crime or did they not? When you were on video footage, 20 different videos. Right? I don't need your geolocation data. I don't need your DNA. I have your video. Right? So if Kesh Patel went and, I don't know, picked up a screwdriver at the crime scene and he wasn't supposed to be there, is it really gonna hurt the case? How? How is it possibly going to hurt the case when you've committed a murder? You assassinated somebody on live TV in front of the entire world. And now we're supposed to believe that the geolocation data is gonna be the smoking gun. What's wrong with this? And sorry. I'm covered in sawdust from head to toe. Some of us have to do manual labor unlike some of these other punks out there. We didn't grow up with a golden spoon in our mouth. We live in a fucking trailer. Okay? These smucks out here. And, like, I'm fucking nobody, and I'm thinking going, this sounds like a load of shit. I don't know about you guys, but I'm not gonna trust another expert. Right? How many experts did we hear from in the JFK assassination? How about the MLK? How about the RFK? How about nine eleven? How about COVID nineteen? Are you guys sick and fucking tired of hearing from the gosh damn experts yet? Because I sure the fuck am. Show us the gosh damn CCTV video that shows Tyler Robinson walking all across the campus, getting onto the roof, getting into his car, running across the neighborhoods because all you've given us is fucking slop, and I ain't buying it. My name is Ryan Mehta. Check out this slop from Jack Posobic. Speaker 1: About the cell phone tracking, that forensic cell phone tracking geofencing data. We know the same exact method of tracking individuals was used in January 6. They were tracking, did someone go onto the steps? Did they go in? Were they on the lawn? Where were they exactly? And we know that investigators using cell phone data can do this. What did you find regarding that data in this case? Speaker 2: So, we're gonna know with, great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages that many of us have questions about, whether those were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, was Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or was he also in Orem? All of that is going to come out. But the main thing is people are saying, okay. How would he have known based on this weird terrain, not being a student at the school? How would he have known this? Because I don't believe you could have planned this murder from Google Maps. So they're going to know based on his cell phone, pathway whether he went on the day before, a couple of weeks before. They'll be able to track all of that. Now I was told from expert, Joseph Scott, that they're going to be able to track him from 8 Hundredth Street down through the tunnel, up around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, run into the woods. And then I started seeing all of these conspiracy videos that they were able to find him on a little cafe's, security system. You can barely see his car, but you can see it. And you had all these conspiracy people saying, how does a guy kill Charlie Kirk? And twenty minutes later, he's, in his car in a parking lot. That's not consistent with what a murderer would do. Well, you don't know how a murderer thinks. Right? He might be sitting in that car amped up on adrenaline. But how did how did the cafe owner know that he was caught on his security camera? Because unless somebody breaks in, you don't just go review, you know, twenty four hours worth of video footage. It's because the FBI tracked him to that location. The next morning, 07:15AM, Cedar City Maverick gas station. How do they know it's him? He swipes a credit card, and they follow his phone. They know when he goes home. They know if he goes to visit Lance, when he goes over to his parents. They've got all of it, the phone calls, the texting, everything. So, this forensic expert, basically, Joseph Scott Morgan, he shared with me that next to the gun, the cell phone data is going to be the the thing that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on that building. And right now, there's a lot of doubt. Oh, I don't know if I can trust the FBI. Well, that that, geotracking, that geo

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

To every parent in America who has had their children kidnapped by CPS. Don’t give up hope, hang in there, help is on the way. We are going to rip the vail off this satanic monster once and for all! https://t.co/UyT3Akt6HB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanted to start off this video by saying I'm not suicidal. I would never kill myself. Any single creator, politician, or celebrity that's ever tried to make a film or a documentary on CPS has wound up dead, literally all of them, including a senator. The film that's gonna drop in November, it's my hardest hitting film yet. We're not holding any punches, and we're gonna rip the veil off to the point where if CPS shows up at your door, I don't know how people are gonna handle it. Our government's running the world's largest child trafficking network that the world has ever seen. I'm never suicidal. I would never take my life. I don't do drugs. I would never overdose. I would never put myself into any horrible position or any way, shape, or form, put myself in any environment. So if anything ever happens to me, it's the United States government. This shit's no joke. I watched I got the first take of this film back yesterday and holy fuck. They're gonna kill me. It's no fucking joke. So since we're going down memory lane, let's take a trip down memory lane and talk about Pizzagate, shall we? Because this is where it all starts at. It starts with Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and the ASFA Act, which has allowed our government to turn every state into a child trafficking empire. And when you see what your government's done to these children and these American families, it's gonna make you sick. So buck up, folks. Take a trip down memory lane and talk about Pizzagate. Speaker 1: Because the Pizzagate story has some outrageous connections to things many have never realized or imagined. In fact, I'm going to share some brand new whistleblower information that is probably going to blow your mind. So let's get into it. First of all, for all those who are unaware, let me give you a quick overview of what the pizzagate scandal was all about in the first place. It all goes back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, who millions of educated people around the world believe to be a couple of sick perverts and child pedophiles. And while there's lots of circumstantial evidence to substantiate those claims, there's never been any direct evidence to prove it. This belief has always just been sort of common knowledge that millions of people agree with. Plainly stated, there has never been a smoking gun linking the Clintons to to child trafficking or pedophilia as anybody who could possibly have such information shows up dead. However, back in 02/2016, Julian Assange published an entire list of Hillary Clinton's emails, which included some emails with John Podesta, the chairman of a presidential campaign. In these emails, it appeared that they were using coded language to describe a child trafficking ring centered in the basement of a Washington DC pizza restaurant called Comet Ping Pong. As a result of this information going viral, a man named Edgar Madison Welch drove to the restaurant with firearms in the hopes of liberating the children being held by child traffickers. While Welch did open fire in the restaurant, fortunately, no one was hurt. In the end, it all turned out to be misdirection or false information as allegedly there wasn't even a basement in the restaurant. Therefore, the entire scandal and the heightened belief that the Clintons were at the heart of a child trafficking ring was conveniently dismissed altogether. However, there was much more to the story than what was dismissed as being absurd at that time. Because in the same set of emails which were made public and which you can still access to this day from the WikiLeaks page, there are documents which were exchanged between Hillary Clinton and one of her associates named Laura Silsbee. In this document exchange, Hillary and Laura go into detail about the logistics of trafficking children from Haiti back to Boise, Idaho where Laura Silsbee lived. Now Laura Silsbee was no stranger to trafficking children. She had previously traveled to Haiti and kidnapped a few dozen children and then attempted to cross the border into the Dominican Republic with them. Fortunately, she was caught, and the children were removed from her custody. She was then basically given a slap on the hand, and she returned to Idaho. Later, in 02/2010, Haiti had a massive earthquake. This gave Laura Silsbee a new opportunity to kidnap more children. Now Laura Silsbee went to Haiti under the guise of being missionaries that sought to care for displaced orphans, But that was a giant scam as the 33 children she and her cohorts eventually kidnapped all had families. None of them were orphaned as a result of the earthquake. In fact, once the Haitian authorities caught her and her accomplices with these 33 children that they had kidnapped, Laura and her accomplices were all put in a Haitian prison, and all 33 children were eventually returned to their families. As reported by Shawnee M. King in her report, Owning Laura Silsbee Shame, How the Haitian Child Trafficking Scheme Embodies the Western Disregard for the Integrity of poor families. The missionaries claim they had the good intentions to set up an orphanage, but investigations showed that none of the children were orphans and that the missionaries may have been attempting to smuggle the children out of Haiti to be adopted internationally. Remarkably, Bill and Hillary Clinton personally negotiated with the Haitian government to have Laura Silsbee and her child trafficking accomplices released, only further demonstrating the connection between child trafficker Laura Silsbee and the Clintons. However, before Bill and Hillary Clinton stepped in and negotiate their release, Laura Silsbee and her accomplices had a lawyer named Jorge Puello advocate on their behalf. The New York Times reported that Jorge Puello was himself suspected of leading an international human trafficking ring involving women and minors. According to the Harvard Human Rights Journal, Puello was ultimately arrested in an investigation being led by US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, ICE, and Homeland Security Investigations in connection with the trafficking ring. He was wanted in The United States, El Salvador, and Costa Rica for his involvement with a network trafficking Central Americans and Haitians. Amazingly, at the time of his arrest, Jorge's wife was already imprisoned in El Salvador and faced charges of presumed sexual exploitation of minors and women. Before we go further, let's review and connect the dots. Laura Silsbee and Hillary Clinton have a document exchange about the logistics of getting children from Haiti that they were planning on kidnapping back into America and ultimately back to Boise, Idaho where Laura Silsbee lived. This was all made public by WikiLeaks. Two, Laura Silsbee and her accomplices went to Haiti and kidnapped 33 children who were not orphans, but who all had living families. Three, Laura Silsbee and her accomplices were caught and captured by Haitian authorities and put in jail for kidnapping children. Four, Laura Silsbee, while in jail in Haiti, got help from Jorge Puello, an alleged lawyer who was himself under investigation for his involvement in a human trafficking ring involving women and minors. He was then arrested. Five, at the time of his arrest, Jorge Puello's wife was already in jail in El Salvador and faced charges of presumed sexual exploitation of minors and women. Six. Bill and Hillary Clinton then personally stepped in and negotiated the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices for being imprisoned in Haiti for trafficking children. So here's the connections. Laura Silsbee and her accomplices were imprisoned for child trafficking. That is not just a wild claim or the outlandish accusation of conspiracy theorists. Laura Silsbee and her accomplices forcefully kidnapped 33 children who had living families. They were stopped by police in Haiti and then put in prison for child trafficking. Laura's alleged lawyer, Jorge Puuelo, was also arrested for human trafficking. Jorge's wife is and was a known and already imprisoned sex trafficker and trafficker of minors. So we have direct associates of Hillary Clinton who are child traffickers and sex traffickers. These are not accusations. These are facts. And to seal the deal to make sure that everyone knows that Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee are personal friends and associates, Bill and Hillary Clinton stepped in to personally negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee. Now hold on. We're getting to the part that will blow your mind. You see, what I've shared so far is very well known by anyone who has researched the story. This is not new news. However, what many people fail to realize is that the number one source of child trafficking in the world is The United States CPS system, and the number one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. In fact, the foster care system, which is fed children by the fraudulent CPS system, has lost over 100,000 children. That's right. Children who are forcefully taken from their parents at the point of a gun by corrupt and feckless police stormtroopers are put into foster care and are then lost. They literally disappear, and nobody looks into what happened to them. So far, we know that at least a 100,000 have been lost in the last twenty years. Ask yourself the question, what happened to them? Where did they go? And, of course, that doesn't include the millions of children who are abused, molested, raped, and tortured by evil foster care parents and social workers who are handsomely financed by your tax dollars. Now how did we get here? How did this all happen? Well, both the creation and financing of the modern day CPS slash foster care system was championed by Hillary Clinton herself. It was called the Adoptive Safe Families or ASFA, and it was signed by Bill Clinton in 1997. This bill takes money from Social Security title four and makes it available to all 50 states for their respective CPS programs. In other words, the federal government, through this new law, gave each of the 50 states a financial incentive to kidnap children, and it has been working marvelously for them. For decades, they mostly targeted poor and minority children or children of single mothers who had no one to advocate for them. But recent anecdotal evidence shows that much like the Obama administration used the IRS as a weapon to target and attack Republicans and conservatives, so states have been using CPS as a tool and a weapon to target conservatives and political opponents. In short, CPS is the ultimate tool in the arsenal child traffickers. Each and every state has its own department that is in control of CPS. Now CPS stands for child protective services, and that is what they claim to do to protect children who are the victims of abusive parents. However, this is simply a giant myth. CPS, which is also called DCS, DCFS, or DFS in some states, even admits in their own reports that over eighty three percent of all children they forcefully take from their parents are taken without any proof or evidence of abuse. They are simply kidnapped for unsubstantiated causes, but they are taken anyway because the CPS offices get paid every time one of these children is kidnapped from their parents. The key to remember is that the entire mess of CPS that we have today, which has morphed into nothing more than the world's largest government subsidized child traffic king ring was created by Hillary Clinton. This means that Hillary Clinton very publicly championed and created the world's largest government subsidized child trafficking ring. She later went on to conspire with a child trafficking friend, Laura Silsbee, to kidnap children in Haiti. Her child trafficking friend, Laura Silsbee, was then very publicly connected to two more human traffickers and child traffickers, Jorge Puello and his wife. These are all known facts that cannot be disputed and are not the cries of some wild conspiracy theory. The links to all of these facts shared in this video are below. So for this to all make sense and so that you'll understand the newly disclosed whistleblower information that will shock you, we need to go one step deeper. When Laura Silsbee and her child trafficking accomplices were released from Haiti, she returned to Meridian, Idaho where she lived, which is right next to Boise, Idaho. Laura apparently got married and changed her name to Laura Gaylor. And remarkably and outrageously, she went to work for a company called AlertSense. AlertSense is the company that had a federal contract to provide the software for the Amber Alert system in America. Now the Amber Alert system was designed to prevent child trafficking and kidnapping, and you've seen it at work with not only digital signs all over the country, but also notifications on your cell phone. Now you can surmise on your own why in the world a company who is responsible for the Amber Alert system, which is supposed to be used to prevent child trafficking, would hire one of the world's most well known child traffickers, Laura Silsbee, to be their vice president of marketing. But at this point, you might wonder why would Laura Silsbee originally want to bring children she kidnapped from another country back to Idaho of all places? Well, according to Tammy Nichols, a state senator from the state of Idaho, Idaho is a known headquarters for child trafficking because of its geography and ease by which human traffickers can get in and out of the state. Speaker 2: And, you know, Idaho is a sex trafficking hub because of where we're situated. We have states all around us. We head up to the Canadian border. It's very easy for someone to utilize our state to traffic children through. Speaker 1: Additionally, Idaho is well known for having an extremely corrupt CPS system where even in a small state with one of the lowest populations in the country, an average of four children every day are kidnapped by CPS in Idaho and taken from their families. So the system that Hillary Clinton created to traffic children is flourishing in where Hillary Clinton's child trafficking friend, Laura Silsbee, is living. And here's the new information that has never been released until now. For many of you, this is going to shock you and infuriate you. Newly released evidence shows that Laura Silsbee, one of the world's most public and well known child traffickers who lives in Idaho, actually works with the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, the IDHW, and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho. This means that Idaho, using taxpayer dollars, is funneling money from the CPS system that Hillary Clinton created so that Hillary Clinton's friend, Laura Silsbee, can receive children who were kidnapped by the CPS system and actually get paid for it. Here is the actual proof. As we have obtained from a whistleblower, screenshots from the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare payment system, where you can see Laura Silsbee's monthly payment she receives for children in her custody who were forcefully kidnapped from their parents. How many scenarios just like this one are going on around the country, and how hard is it now to imagine where those 100,000 children who have been lost and disappeared in foster care have ended up? Now the rabbit hole goes even deeper. Idaho's attorney general, Raul Labrador, decided to do an investigation into the financial misappropriations and other apparent malfeasance on behalf of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. But before the investigation could get underway, two incredible things took place. Number one, the director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Dave Pedobear Jepison, as he has been referred to, resigned from his position and has since disappeared. He apparently fled the state. Number two, judge Lynn Norton, who has already had multiple counts of judicial misconduct filed against her with the Idaho judicial council specifically for protecting child traffickers, made an order to prevent the attorney general from investigating the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. That's right. Let me repeat. This judge, Lynn Misconduct Norton, has made an order preventing the Idaho attorney general from investigating corruption, malfeasance, and financial misappropriation at the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Now why do you think she would do that? What are they covering up? Now the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare takes a greater share of Idaho's annual budget than any other line item in the budget. And we now know, thanks to brave whistleblowers, that one of the world's most famous child traffickers, Laura Silsbee, who is thoroughly connected to other child traffickers and is a personal friend of Hillary Clinton, is and was working for the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare as a foster care parent, all being funded by the ASFA program, which was created and championed by Hillary Clinton, who, again, is a personal friend and associate of Laura Silsbee. Is it any wonder that when the Pizzagate information went public, that events took place to immediately dismiss the entire thing and to make it sound absurd and to make the news immediately old and irrelevant? Is it any wonder that a so called expert journalist who denounced the Pizzagate scandal, which served to highlight the idea that Hillary Clinton and other elites are child traffickers, was later arrested and pled guilty to child pornography charges? Judge for yourself. And you're in Idaho, you better watch out for Laura Silsbee, aka Laura Gaylor, judge Lynn Misconduct Norton, and anybody who supports the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and their government subsidized child trafficking system. And make no mistake about it. This government subsidized trafficking system extends to all 50 states, even the so called conservative ones like Arizona, Texas, and Florida, who are all some of the worst offenders when it comes to CPS corruption.
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 7:25 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Is this legit? Did Erika Kirk really stumbled when trying to remember the year her and Charlie Kirk got married and claimed it was hard to remember the dates because of a meeting they had with Bibi or was this edited and taken out of context? https://t.co/fo2vGr2IYF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript opens with Speaker 0 praising Speaks with Didi for a recent video featuring Erica Kirk and Charlie Kirk, where they are asked about their engagement, when they met, how they got married, specific dates in their relationship, and how it all came together. They are asked a series of dating/marriage date questions: Have you ever forgotten the date you started dating someone? Have you ever forgotten an engagement date four years into your relationship due to the honeymoon phase? What would happen if your spouse didn’t remember the exact year you were married? Speaker 1 responds by stating they have been married since 2021. They acknowledge their dates are messy because of babies—anniversaries and kids’ birth dates, among others. They explain that they know when it was time to get married and that they just know. They also say, “Don’t waste your time,” and that they are ready to start their life together. Speaker 0 then asks the audience to locate the original video and inquires about what Phoebe was talking about and whether that portion was cut in. The response comments that it’s hard to remember the dates because of the meeting with Phoebe. There is a brief, unclear barrage of phrases: “What? Foot and mouth? Anyone?” followed by “That was live. She couldn't back that up. That's weird.” In summary, the segment centers on a discussion of memory and precision around dating and marriage dates, the reality that their calendars are cluttered by children and anniversaries, and a note about reconstructing or recalling a prior part of the video involving Phoebe, with a mention that the moment was live and difficult to back up. The key details retained are that Charlie and Erica Kirk say they’ve been married since 2021, acknowledge the dating dates are muddled by family milestones, and emphasize a sense of knowing when it was time to commit, while also referencing a live moment related to Phoebe that they found hard to recall or verify.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanna give a big shout out to Speaks with Didi in this recent video she just dropped. It's of Erica Kirk and Charlie Kirk being asked questions about their engagement, when they met, how they got married, specific dates in their relationship, and how it all came together. Let me ask you this. Have you ever forgot the date that you started dating somebody? Have you ever forgot an engagement date literally four years into your relationship just out of the honeymoon phase? What do you think would happen if your wife or your husband didn't remember the exact even year that you guys were married? Check this out. Speaker 1: It's easy. How long have you been married, and when did you know it was time to get married? We've been married since 2021. One. We laugh about this because our dates are so messed up because of babies. Meaning, there's so many dates to remember. Anniversaries, g like, kids birth birth Yeah. You know, August How '20 did we used to we've been married for How did you know it was time to get married? I mean How did we know? We just you just know. It's also what don't waste your time. Don't waste your time. And plus, we are ready to start our life together. That's right. Okay. That was an easy one. That's easy. Speaker 0: So I want you guys to do me a favor. Can anybody find that that original video? Was that like that? And what was she talking about about Phoebe? Was that cut in there? We don't remember. It's hard to remember the dates because of the meeting with Phoebe. What? Foot and mouth? Anyone? That was live. She couldn't back that up. That's weird.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Is it true that Donald Trumps previous spiritual advisor was just arrested and charged with six counts of abusing a 12 year old little girl and he was only sentenced to 6 months in jail? https://t.co/Fr5p6LjcDL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses Robert Morris, identified as the founder and pastor of a large evangelical Zionist megachurch in Texas, who also served as a spiritual adviser to Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speaker asserts that Morris pled guilty to six counts of abusing a 12-year-old girl, and notes that Morris was sentenced to six months in jail. The speaker emphasizes the severity of the crime by repeating that Morris pled guilty to six counts and adds the claim that “six months in jail” is the sentence he received. The speaker emphasizes Morris’s prominence by noting the church’s size and Morris’s role as Trump’s spiritual adviser in the first term, highlighting the juxtaposition between Morris’s public leadership position and the criminal charges mentioned. The narrative repeatedly stresses the discrepancy between the gravity of the alleged crime and the relatively short jail sentence, underscoring the speaker’s perception of leniency. In addition to presenting the factual sequence—identity of Morris, his role, the guilty plea on six counts, and the six-month sentence—the speaker injects personal commentary to convey strong condemnation. The speaker states, “I guess it pays to be a piece of shit,” using this harsh judgment to comment on the situation. They further add, “If it was up to me, this guy would be and some other things that I really can't talk about here on this platform,” signaling an intent to withhold further discussion of consequences in this venue but conveying a desire for more severe punishment. A recurring question frames the remainder of the remarks: “My question is why is there so many people that are directly involved in Trump's circle that are getting accused and sentenced and pleading guilty to being cheese pizza? Why? Why is that?” This rhetorical inquiry points to a broader concern raised by the speaker about others in Trump’s circle facing criminal accusations, guilty pleas, or sentences, and it uses the phrase “being cheese pizza” as a descriptor within that inquiry. The content of the transcript centers on the alleged crime, the sentencing, and the speaker’s pointed critique of the perceived pattern among individuals connected to Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys are gonna wanna see this. So this guy right here, his name is Robert Morris. He is the founder and the pastor of one of the biggest evangelical Zionist megachurches in all of Texas, but he was Trump's spiritual adviser in his first term in office. This guy right here just pled guilty to six counts of abusing a 12 year old little girl. Six counts. He pled guilty to it. Guess what his, guess what his sentence is? Six months in jail. I guess it pays to be a piece of shit. If it was up to me, this guy would be and some other things that I I really can't talk about here on this platform. My question is why is there so many people that are directly involved in Trump's circle that are getting accused and sentenced and pleading guilty to being cheese pizza? Why? Why is that? So this guy right here, his name is Robert Morris. He is the founder and the pastor of one of the biggest evangelical Zionist megachurches in all of Texas, but he was Trump's spiritual adviser in his first term in office. This guy right here just pled guilty to six counts of abusing a 12 year old little girl. Six counts. He pled guilty to it. Guess what his guess what his sentence is? Six months in jail. I guess it pays to be a piece of shit. If it was up to me, this guy would be and some other things that I I really can't talk about here on this platform. My question is why is there so many people that are directly involved in Trump's circle that are getting accused and sentenced and pleading guilty to being cheese pizza. Why? Why is that?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

According to Nancy Grace, the FBI was investigating every conspiracy theory involving the assassination of Charlie Kirk. What Changed? https://t.co/4z1OL7DGP7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on claims surrounding Cash Patel (referred to as Kash Patel in parts) and the investigation into conspiracy theories tied to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0 recalls Patel’s assertion that questioning the FBI’s official narrative and insisting anything other than a lone shooter with a trans girlfriend who allegedly used a 30-06 rifle would not only fail to fit the narrative but also brand critics as anarchists, harmful, and conspiracy theorists. This set the stage for contrasting past remarks and current assertions about the case. Speaker 1 introduces what they call a breaking development: the FBI reportedly says the Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories are legit, describing this as the first time the government has acknowledged such theories in relation to the case. They connect it to broader controversial topics like JFK and UFOs, implying an unusual shift in official stance. They then state that Cash Patel says he is actually investigating the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0 follows by questioning Patel’s consistency, asking listeners to remember if Patel had previously claimed or asserted something different, signaling a discrepancy between prior statements and new claims about investigations into conspiracies. Speaker 2 adds that, in relation to social media, when hysterical conspiracy theories fill the void, they harm Charlie and his family and the rightful prosecution of his alleged assassin, who is in custody, and notes that if anyone helped the assassin, the FBI would not let them get away with it. This emphasizes a concern about the impact of conspiracy theories on the victim’s family and the legal process. Speaker 0 closes by addressing Kesh Patel directly, asserting, “No. We don’t think you’re gonna let them get away with it,” implying certainty that Patel will assist in covering up or obstructing accountability rather than pursuing conspiracy theories. Overall, the dialogue juxtaposes Patel’s claimed investigations into Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories with the FBI’s alleged stance on such theories, while also highlighting tensions between public discourse on conspiracies, media commentary, and the pursuit of justice regarding the murder case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Do you guys remember when Kash Patel today just told us that if you question the FBI's official narrative and you think that anything else besides Tyler Robinson was a lone shooter on the roof with a trans girlfriend that shot with a 30 odd six and somehow didn't blow a hole in Charlie Kirk's neck? If you think anything but that, you're an anarchist, you're you're harmful, and you're a conspiracy theorist. Well, do you remember what Nancy Grace said about Cash Patel not too long ago? Speaker 1: Breaking news tonight. The FBI says the Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories are legit. That's the first time we've ever heard that from the government. Think about it. JFK, UFOs, it goes on and on and on. But tonight, Cash Patel says he is actually investigating the many, many conspiracy theories surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: Wait. But didn't Cash Patel just tell us Speaker 2: As, again, with social media, when you have hysterical conspiracy theories filling the void, you're harming Charlie and his family and a rightful prosecution of his alleged assassin who we have in custody and rightly so in my opinion. And if anyone helped him, do you think that we at this FBI are literally gonna let them get away with it? Speaker 0: Well, Kesh Patel, since you asked, no. We don't think you're gonna let them get away with it. We think you're gonna help them cover it up.
Saved - October 16, 2025 at 5:55 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why do you think “THEY” assassinated William Cooper? https://t.co/NKLpVi3GMv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references a book titled Pale Horse Rider by Marc Jacobs about William Cooper, claiming that Cooper was assassinated by Israel, and notes what Cooper was allegedly warning about just before his death. The discussion then expands into a critique of modern society, using the "Roman circus" metaphor: the emperor keeps people distracted with entertainment, sports salaries, and spectacles to prevent them from learning the truth or questioning authority. The speaker asks what sport Jews are best at and asserts there is no sport in which Jews are the most talented, instead claiming Jews dominate politics, corruption, blackmail, the music industry, and film because those are the domains used to indoctrinate the public. The speaker questions how many children go pro in sports or receive full athletic scholarships, suggesting that if attention and resources were redirected toward studying money, finance, and religion, the country would be different. Aimed at Gen Alpha, Gen X, and Gen Z, the message challenges high school and college students to assess whether they have what it takes to go pro in sports and, if not, to redirect time and energy toward politics, trades, and financial literacy. There is a strong exhortation to pursue practical skills: start apprenticeships, work summer jobs, and learn trades such as construction, welding, electricity, or other skilled labor. The speaker encourages stacking Bitcoin relentlessly for eight years to achieve financial independence, claiming this would allow one to escape the “matrix,” live like a king outside America, and be able to date and form a family with partners who are younger but open to children. This is framed as a path to freedom from a debt-slave existence under a government allegedly devaluing wealth and bankrupted by policy. The speaker contrasts this with the current situation of parents who may be unable to retire, with many working in service jobs well into old age due to financial pressures and devalued wealth. The commentary asserts that the country is “occupied and controlled by the Jews,” linking this to broader concerns about national decline and the need to resist indoctrination and deplatforming. The closing message emphasizes the fight to resist being silenced or bankrupted, urging listeners to become “uncancelable and unbankruptable” and to stop letting themselves be indoctrinated, ending with a blessing and a call to continue the fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think Pope Leo and the Pale Horse was all just by coincidence? It wasn't. Let me show you something about William Cooper. So this is a book, and it's called Pale Horse Rider. William Cooper, the rise of the conspiracy and the fall of trust in America by Marc Jacobs. Okay? William Cooper was assassinated by Israel. And right before he got assassinated, do you remember what he was telling us? Check this out. Speaker 1: I don't care how long he works, and I don't care what he does. There is no job worth $2,000,000 a year. That's why they pay athletes these fantastic salaries. I was listening to radio the other day. They just contracted to pay one one player on one team $6,000,000 a year. Can you believe this? And why is that? It's the Roman circus. What does the emperor do when the people become restive and when the people are asking questions and when the people don't like the policies of the emperor, he sends them to the circus. He creates a circus. He builds a giant coliseum, and he begins to throw the Christians to the lions. He has great chariot races and football games and basketball games, all to keep the idiots preoccupied with things that don't mean anything in the scheme of the entire world So that they don't have the time to learn what the truth is. So they don't ever get smart enough to learn how they're being manipulated. So they don't ever question the emperor. That's why they pay a player on a football team or a baseball team a million or 2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a year. It is the Roman circus. Speaker 0: So let me ask you this, America. What sport are the Jews best at? Can you name one? Is there any one sport in the entire world where the Jews are the most talented, the best, the highest qualified, the strongest, the fastest, the hardest hitting? No. You can't. What categories are they best in? Politics, corruption, blackmail, the music industry, and film. Why? Because that's what indoctrinates us. Ask yourself, how many children go pro in sports? How many get a full ride? Not very many. Right? Imagine if all of those people, all of those citizens, all of those children would have spent their time in their days studying money, studying finance, studying religion. Where do you think our country would be at today? Do you think we'd be this cesspool of corruption dominated by Israel and controlled by the Jews? And this message, it goes out to Gen Alpha, Gen X, Gen Z guys. If you guys are in high school, if you guys are in college, you guys are not the fastest, the talented, you guys know deep down in your heart if you got what it takes to go pro. If you don't have that relentless, whatever that is inside somebody, if you're not up at four in the morning doing sit ups, doing push ups, if you're not coming home after school and you're not studying playbooks, if you're not watching sports relentlessly, if you're not out there running and doing everything that you can to push yourself to go pro, then you don't have what it takes. And if you don't have what it takes, get your head out of the ass. If you've gained enough knowledge and you understand how teamwork works, and there's definitely some values that come with playing sports. Right? I'm not gonna knock those. But at this point in your life, if you are in high school and you don't have what it takes to go pro, maybe you should start dedicating your time, your resources, and your energy to studying politics, understanding how the world works. Go out and get a second job. Start learning a skill of trades. Become an apprentice. You're 14. You're 16. Become an apprentice. Spend your summers working construction, becoming a welder, learning electricity, learning becoming an electrician. Do whatever you can to stack as much Bitcoin as humanly possible, and I promise you, in eight years, if you go relentless at it, you stay home, you don't go out and drink, you don't party, you don't chase pussy, you just stack Bitcoin relentlessly. In four to eight years, you will set yourself up and be in a position where you never have to work. You never have to be a slave in the matrix. You can literally escape the matrix and live like a king. And you can travel out of the country, You can meet a beautiful woman who's five or ten years younger than you depending on how old you are. Not saying any creepy weird shit. I'm talking about when you become an adult. You can date women that are much much more they're way out of your league, but they love you. And they wanna make babies and they wanna have a family. And you can have all of that and you can live like a king outside of America. So don't subject yourself to being a debt slave in America, trapped in a sit in a country that's completely occupied and controlled by the Jews. Listen. Look at your parents. Are you happy that your parents are probably gonna be 70 years old and they can't retire? Your mom's still waiting tables. She's still working at a cafe. She's working at Home Depot. She's greeter at Walmart because she just needs money because she can't afford to live off of her social security. She can't afford to live off her retirement because our government's devalued the wealth of our entire nation and pretty much bankrupted everyone. Is this a country you really wanna raise your kids in? If it's not, you don't think it's gonna be saved, which it may may or may not be. I'm not saying that it's not. I'm not giving up the fight. We're still right here fighting the good fight. But at the same time, we are watching everybody get crushed. If they don't crush you, if they can't silence you, they can't de platform you, they're gonna try to bankrupt you. And you need make yourself uncancelable and unbankruptible, but stop letting them indoctrinate you. God bless you guys.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

For the next twenty four hours every pundit and political commentator will be flooding your X timeline for commentary related to Pope Leo XIV being gifted a white horse. https://t.co/81e5D62rK4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers portray a coordinated propaganda mechanism designed to hijack the audience’s attention and drive engagement with a single, symbolic target. They describe a “pale horse” motif, invoking the four horsemen of the apocalypse, and claim the gear or design of the presentation is to divert attention to a “big shiny object.” They assert that the content will dominate one’s Twitter news feed for the next twenty-four hours and that viewers have likely seen it all over their feed, with the aim of guiding perception by what people are shown. Beyond surface-level manipulation, the speakers reference Bill Cooper as someone who warned about hidden dangers, noting that Cooper “was assassinated by, well, God's chosen people,” and present this claim as evidence of a broader conspiracy. They then shift to a denunciation of secret societies, arguing that groups of men secretly meet, take blood oaths to be cut open and have their heart ripped out and intestines scattered if they talk about secrets, and that such a “benevolent” label is a misrepresentation. They characterize these groups as dangerous, not benevolent, and claim they do not believe in the God of the Bible. Instead, they contend they worship the God of light, Lucifer, the angel of light, who was flung down to the earth and became the Lord of the world, asserting that this is the guiding force behind a global power structure. The speakers claim that this secret society has infiltrated and is eating at the heart of the nation “like a cancer,” subverting it from within. They allege that the Constitution has not been allowed to work since 1945, and possibly earlier, due to ongoing hidden activity. The asserted goal is the creation of a one-world totalitarian socialist government, with the Communist Manifesto as its platform, advanced through the United Nations. They trace the UN’s creation to the nation’s own foundational structures via the League of Nations, which supposedly laid the groundwork for today’s UN. They assert that at the highest levels of government, the Constitution has been scrapped and that operations occur under the aegis of the UN Participation Act and the United Nations Charter. The overall claim is that a conspiratorial elite uses the UN framework to implement global domination, steering events in a direction contrary to the nation’s original constitutional principles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understand how the game is played. Are you starting to wake up? This is propaganda. This is designed to take over your news feed. It's very symbolical. Pale horse. Right? This refers to the four horsemen, the apocalypse. And the gear or the design is to take your attention away. Look over here at the big shiny object. This will be covering your Twitter news feed for the next twenty four hours. Mark my word. If you're seeing this, you've most likely seen it all over your Twitter feed. Why? Because that's exactly what they want you to see. But what they're not talking about is what Bill Cooper was warning us about years ago. This man was also assassinated by, well, God's chosen people. Check this out. Speaker 1: It's just absolutely incredible that the American people don't understand that groups of men don't get together and meet in secret and take blood oaths which say that they can be cut open and their heart ripped out of their body and their intestines scattered over the floor if they talk about the secrets. That's not a benevolent fraternity. That's a dangerous group of men. Strong men don't play games like that. They're serious. These men who bring about the new world over don't believe in the God of the Bible. They believe in the God of light, Lucifer, the angel of light, who was flung down to the earth and became the Lord of the world. That's their God. You see, it's been infiltrated, and from within, they're eating at the heart of this nation like a cancer, this secret society. They are destroying it. They are subverting it. Our constitution has not been allowed to work since 1945 and maybe even earlier. And they have been working behind the scenes to bring about a one world totalitarian socialist government with the communist manifesto as its platform, through the United Nations, which was created by this nation, from an older organization called the League of Nations, which was the original foundation, and at the highest levels of our government, the constitution's already been scrapped, and they are working under the aegis of the UN Participation Act and the United Nations Charter.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Behold, a pale horse.

Video Transcript AI Summary
William Cooper (Bill Cooper) is described as the first to provide video evidence that JFK was not assassinated by a lone shooter and that the footage had been manipulated, along with claims that Israel was involved. He is also portrayed as detailing how Israel would subvert the will of America and take over the country by any means necessary, ultimately leading to what he described as an apocalyptic world war that would create and bring about a one-government system. The speaker then presents a video excerpt attributed to Cooper about the plans and aims of “them.” The extract states: “Their whole purpose throughout history has been to teach a small number of people how to become adept at controlling everyone else.” It argues their goal is to “destroy all existing religions, save theirs, all existing governments, save theirs, and shackle the mob in a system of eternal oppressive debt chained to a computer for the rest of their life and a propagandized world to make them believe that they are happy in this system.” It questions whether these aims are succeeding, and concludes that they are, because “the American people don’t understand their enemy.” The message emphasizes that there is “a method to their madness” and that there is not much method to the audience’s own approach because they are operating from “a place of ignorance.” It asserts that without understanding the nature of the enemy and the weapons used, one cannot fight the enemy or even be on the battlefield, and that the audience is losing the war. The speaker claims that the country was founded by “dangerous men,” and states that unless there is a real free press providing viewpoints beyond those in the establishment-controlled media, there will be “a civil war in this country and it’s going to come soon.” Further, the excerpt describes the need to wake up “vast amounts of sleeping people.” It refers to the public as “Sheeple,” suggesting they are following “the Judas goat” into “the shearing pens” and toward slaughter, not realizing anything is wrong until they “smell the blood of the sheeple in front of them.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So before we talk about behold a pale horse, let me talk about a gentleman by the name of Bill Cooper, William Cooper. If you guys are new to the whole conspiracy rabbit hole and you're just waking up to this death grip that Israel has in our country like I was a couple years ago, Bill Cooper, William Cooper, might be a name that you've never heard before. So William Cooper was the first one to actually get video evidence that showed that JFK wasn't assassinated by a lone shooter, and they have manipulated the footage. And he was the one who was telling us that Israel was involved in it. He was also the one that was going into great detail explaining how Israel was going to basically subvert the will of America and take over our country basically by any means necessary and basically lead us into what they call an apocalyptic world war that was gonna create and bring on this one government. So let me play a video about William Cooper and what he said about behold a pale horse. Check this out. Speaker 1: Their whole purpose throughout history has been to teach a small number of people how to become adept at controlling everyone else. Their goal is to destroy all existing religions, save theirs, all existing governments, save theirs, and shackle the mob in a system of eternal oppressive debt chained to a computer for the rest of their life and a propagandized world to make them believe that they are happy in this system. Now, do you think they are succeeding? Haven't I described to you just now exactly what is going on in the world today? Yes, they are succeeding. They're succeeding because the American people don't understand their enemy. They don't even know what's happening. There's a method to their madness. There's really not much method to yours because you're operating from a place of ignorance. And until you change that, you're gonna be bumbling around, bumping into each other, saying and doing the wrong things, not understanding the nature of your enemy. And if you don't understand the nature of your enemy and the weapons they use, you cannot fight that enemy. You can't fight the battle. You shouldn't even be on the battlefield. That's why you're losing the war. And don't tell me you're not because I'm in a place of great knowledge about who's winning and who's losing this war. And I can assure you, you're losing the war. This country was founded by dangerous men. Amen. And the moment the people in this country cease to be dangerous men, it's going to be the day we cease to have a country. But I'm going to tell you right now, unless we can be successful in creating a real free press where the American people get different viewpoints other than those expressed in the establishment controlled media, there's going to be a civil war in this country and it's going to come soon. The only thing that can stop it is by waking up vast amounts of sleeping people. Sheeple is what they are. They are following the Judas goat right into the shearing pens and from there they will go to the slaughter and they will not know that anything is wrong until they smell the blood of the sheeple in front of them.
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 10:25 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

https://t.co/JnBoiODthh

Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:19 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

What happened to the medic at the Charlie Kirk assassination? https://t.co/Z7Pi2cODmN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker questions why a medic near Charlie when he was shot isn't seen: "there was a medic walking behind the tent, had to have been five feet from Charlie the second that he got shot? Why didn't we see a medic running around that tent to render aid to Charlie, or did we? Did I miss this? Did somebody else see a medic carrying a big bag of medical supplies and coming over and rendering aid to Charlie, or did we just see dudes jumping over a railing, grabbing some shit, doing some handoffs, and taking off?" "Pretty weird. Check this video out. Let me know what you guys think." The discussion shifts to "Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Too many." "Ten years? That. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait. So you mean tell me that there was a medic that was walking behind the tent, had to have been five feet from Charlie the second that he got shot? Why didn't we see a medic running around that tent to render aid to Charlie, or did we? Did we miss this? Did somebody else see a medic carrying a big bag of medical supplies and coming over and rendering aid to Charlie, or did we just see dudes jumping over a railing, grabbing some shit, doing some handoffs, and taking off? Pretty weird. Check this video out. Let me know what you guys think. Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Too many. Ten years? That. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Are we about to get hit with another directed energy weapon, or is this just a natural phenomenon? https://t.co/X06nHltz2e

Video Transcript AI Summary
"What the f is going on in Antarctica? He said this image has been confirmed to be real. At Grok is claiming that it is a natural phenomenon." "Giant energy waves moving north. A massive pulse appears to be radiating from Antarctica spanning more than 6,000 miles towards Australia." "hurricane Helene, the Maui fires, the earthquakes in New Zealand, the North Pole, Antarctica, directed energy, the dams, the deep underground military bases with the I forget what those big circle balls are. The big balls, not big balls from Doge, but the other big balls that are buried deep down in the ice, those big balls." "And our government's ability to create what I've been calling you guys, we got a false flag coming."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Where are all my geoengineering experts at? Because my man, Matt Baker, just put out this tweet, and he says, what the f is going on in Antarctica? He said this image has been confirmed to be real. At Grok is claiming that it is a natural phenomenon. Are you buying this? Giant energy waves moving north. A massive pulse appears to be radiating from Antarctica spanning more than 6,000 miles towards Australia. So I know you guys think we're freaking crazy out there, but hurricane Helene, the Maui fires, the earthquakes in New Zealand, the North Pole, Antarctica, directed energy, the dams, the deep underground military bases with the I forget what those big circle balls are. The big balls, not big balls from Doge, but the other big balls that are buried deep down in the ice, those big balls. And our government's ability to create what I've been calling you guys, we got a false flag coming. Is this it? How bad is it gonna be, folks? I mean, are they gonna start setting off volcanoes? Are they gonna do another hurricane? Are they gonna do another Maui fire? What do you think the natural disaster is gonna be? Or is it gonna be another false flag terrorist attack? Or another assassination carried out by Israel? What do you think good old our greatest ally over in The Middle East has in store for us? Let me know what you guys think down in the comments, and let me know how are you guys figuring this out. What websites are you guys using? Drop all the intel, make some screen recordings, take some videos, put them down in the comments, let everybody know that so everybody can get on the same page. And maybe if enough of us start calling off this shit, obviously, doesn't look like a natural phenomenon to me. Just saying. Just you guys think water bends around the ball? You gotta dig a little deeper. We out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

A Israeli-British psychic Uri Geller just warned President Trump not to travel to Egypt. Do you think Israel is planning to assassinate another US President. https://t.co/zdGIAcaBYo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Warning to President Trump: "JD Vance, Marco Rubio, speaker Mike Johnson, every sleazebag around him is not a good guy" and "it's just all about installing JD Vance and most likely Marco Rubio." The speaker endorses following "shadow of the Ezra" for content. "Self proclaimed British psychic Yuri Gury" warns Trump not to travel to Sharam Al Egypt after his upcoming visit to Israel, claiming he fears for Trump's safety and urging maximum security; this warning comes the same day "multiple Qatari diplomats were killed in a car accident in Egypt." The speaker says Trump surrounded himself with "rats" and urges attacking the scumbags around him to expose them as crooked cronies, or else "it's all going down the shitter." He cites Turning Point USA and Charlie, claiming "they put a bullet through his neck." A message to Trump to consider Israel but beware in Sharmansheik; share your thoughts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is a warning to president Trump, guys. And anybody that still thinks that Trump is the good guy, let's be very clear on this. JD Vance, Marco Rubio, speaker Mike Johnson, every sleazebag around him is not a good guy, and they don't give a shit about Trump. It's just all about installing JD Vance and most likely Marco Rubio. So the I'm telling you guys, you gotta pay attention. If there's one account that you should be following, it's shadow of the Ezra. This dude is a top g. His work is flawless, and he's always out here all over the Internet, you know, constantly grabbing the best content and trying to give it to you guys in a format that's easy to digest. Short, simple. I'm a huge fan of his work. And he says self proclaimed British psychic Yuri Gury is warning president Trump to not travel to Sharam Al Egypt after his upcoming visit to Israel. Now Geller says that he fears for president Trump's safety, urging him to surround himself with maximum security and to trust nobody who gets cloak too close. And he says this warning comes on the same day multiple Qatari diplomats were killed in a car accident in Egypt. So if you guys are one of the guys that actually thinks that Trump is the good guy, and I don't think that. Right? I think that there's been enough evidence that people that Trump surrounded himself with, his entire cabinet, his administration, Susie Wiles, I think they're all rats. I think they're all trying to stab him in the back, but he did it to himself. If So you still think Trump is the good guy, you should be relentlessly attacking all of the scumbags that are surrounding them and trying to call them out and expose them for the crooked cronies that they actually are so that Trump realizes that if he doesn't do something and act fast and take swift and decisive action, his entire administration, all these four years, everything that he has planned, everything that he wanted to do to make America great again, it's all going down the shitter. This administration is running gosh damn circles around him just like at Turning Point USA. Just like everybody at that organization, they were all built up around Charlie. Charlie thought he ran it, but the organization ran Charlie and they kept him in checkmate until finally he said, nope. I'm done. I'm ripping the shekels off. And what did they do? They put a bullet through his neck. Speaker 1: Hi. This message is for you, Donald Donald Trump. Wow. It's amazing that you're coming to Israel. Incredible that you're going to give a mind blowing speech in the Knesset. But from there, you might be flying to Sharm and Sheikh. Please read my message. I'm just very concerned, very concerned. Please read the entire message. I say don't go there. Don't go to Sharmansheik. But if you do, make sure that you're protected, super protected all around you. Don't let anyone close to you, and be careful. Be very careful, especially in Shamansheik. Sheikh. Speaker 0: So I don't what you guys think. You guys think Trump's still one of the good guys? You think he's on our side, or do you think he sold this soul to the gosh damn devil and he's our first Jewish president? Let me know what you guys think down in the comments. We out. Peace.
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 12:37 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If any one is investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination. Here are a few new never before seen Camera angels of the minutes leading up to the shooting. https://t.co/3dzL2nBbO8

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Breaking news, Candace Owen’s just tweeted, “On September 10th, after Charlie’s assasination, an Egyptian Air Force plane flew out of Provo, Utah. Tail number: SU-BTT, We now need to reexamine which foreign leaders were in the United States during this approximate time frame, or what happened in the news leading up to this that may have led to someone calling for his murder.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Candace is breaking on September 10 after Charlie's assassination." "An Egyptian Air Force plane flew out of Provo, Utah. Tail number, SUBTT." "Its first trip to America ever was made on July 20 to an army base in Nebraska." "the decision to murder Charlie Kirk in Utah was made around July 18." "A military meeting with foreign leaders took place on July 20 on US soil." "The plane flew into Provo direct from France on September 4 and stayed around or stayed until just after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, flying out of Williamston on that day." "The plane returned to Egypt the following day on September 11." "Things are not adding up here. This is a full scale military operation, and Candace is on point."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, shit. I don't know if you guys have just seen this new post by Candace, but, woah, buckle up. Hopefully, you guys are ready. So check this out. Candace is breaking on September 10 after Charlie's assassination. An Egyptian Air Force plane flew out of Provo, Utah. Tail number, SUBTT. Its first trip to America ever was made on July 20 to an army base in Nebraska. Tyler Robinson must have had some powerful friends. Okay? But that's just the start, so buckle up. Okay. So Candice goes on to say in this next part, which is really important. She says, with all that we've crowdsourced, it looks like the decision to murder Charlie Kirk in Utah was made around July 18. Now a military meeting with foreign leaders took place on July 20 on US soil. The plane flew into Provo direct from France on September 4 and stayed around or stayed until just after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, flying out of Williamston on that day. The plane returned to Egypt the following day on September 11. Then she goes on in this next part to say, we need to reimagine which foreign leaders were in The United States during the approximate time frame or what happened in the news leading up to this that may have led to someone calling for his murder. Okay? This is pretty freaking big, guys. Like, this is really freaking big. And this is why it's so important. If you guys haven't seen this tweet from Sam Parker, I'm telling you it's very rare that I get hundreds, and I mean hundreds of DMs from everybody sending me the exact same link. And I'm not talking about people that already follow me. I'm talking, like, I go into my spam folder where where all the new people have just DM me for the first time, and it's like boom, boom, boom, boom. Every single one is the Sam Parker tweet. So I tried to do a screen recording and make a video on it just a few minutes ago, but I don't know. For some reason, the screen recording wasn't was messing up on my phone, and it and I sat there for twenty two minutes screen recording this just to save that video, and it didn't work. So that being said, if you guys wanna check this out, I highly recommend it. It was in our Twitter space last week. If you think this Candace news is big news, you need to take that you need to check out this breakdown by Sam Parker where he goes through and he talks about the Google searches. And why were specific names, like a coroner or the medical examiner at Utah Valley University who's just started two weeks prior, why was that woman's name being searched by an Israel IP address, I don't know, about two months before the assassination? Things are not adding up here. This is a full scale military operation, and Candace is on point. Drop some comments. Let me know what you think. We

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do they really think we are stupid enough to fall for another Israeli false flag. https://t.co/QkHKxlkNRa

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker promotes Jess. He shifts to Israel and Muslims, declaring: "We’re not getting invaded. Nobody’s fucking invading America. If anybody attacks us on US soil, it’s gonna be Israel, and we’re gonna raise up an army, and we’re gonna go fucking to war with them." He questions why Americans fund other countries: "Why did we send $20,000,000,000 to Tanzania… Guatemala… Madagascar…?" and asks what benefits to the US. He argues elites have enriched themselves, lamenting debt and infrastructure. He asserts: "The Zionist shills think we’re all as fucking retarded as they are." He alleges: "If you don’t support Israel, then I hope you enjoy your Islamist state," and accuses Israel of destabilizing Syria, producing refugees, and colonizing with US aid—"almost half of our THAAD missile defense battery right now over there in Israel." He links migration and "interest based loans," noting historic bans on interest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you guys ever are just cruising through x and you just need that dopamine hit because you're, you know, you're just scrolling and, you know, the rest of the fucking slop, they're serving you like the Benny Johnson. They're serving you just isn't fucking triggering it. Swing over here and give my man, the artist known as Jess, a follow. He goes by at l of son Jess over on next. This dude is fucking flawless. His one liners are off the hook. And when it comes to delivering and making that point and driving it home, there's very few people that can articulate it and do it in a way that Jess does. So his man's off the hook, huge fan of his work. And in this video, he starts talking about Israel and Muslims and the invasion, you know, and how they think that we're as stupid as they are. Right? Like, this is America, motherfuckers. Right? You think somebody's gonna come and attack us on US soil? Remember what happened the last time somebody fucked around and found out? Granted, it was a false flag, but how did that fucking around and finding out work out for them? Not too good. Right? And it's overwhelmingly obvious. Like, the American people are waking up, and we're going, hey. Why did we send $20,000,000,000 to Tanzania over the last four years? Why did we send a billion dollars to Guatemala over the last four years? Why do we send, I don't know. What was it? $1,000,000,000 to Madagascar over the last four years? And I could go on and on, and nobody could even name Tanzania on a map. And then have people are like, hey. It's not Tanzania. It's Tanzania. And I'm like, yeah. I know, bro. I was there, but I speak to half the people in the country and half people tell me it's Tanzania. Half people tell me it's Tanzania. I get you guys. I'm driving that point home. You're welcome. Thank you. But where I'm going with this is why the fuck are we being taxed to death to send our tax dollars to these third world countries? Oh, it's to bring them up out of poverty. Oh, what happens when they come up out of poverty? Is are are we benefiting? Are they buying our products? What exactly is it that we are manufacturing, that we are going to be selling these these third world countries? Oh, they're gonna get on Facebook. Oh, I'm so excited. So Mark Zuckerberg's gonna get Zuckerbuck fucking rich, and we're gonna be over here fucking what? Sucking the tit? How does The United States benefit? Where the fuck is all of our tax dollars gone? The trillions and trillions and trillion $38,000,000,000,000 we're in debt? What do we have to show for it? Do we have our roads paved in gold? Do we have fantastic infrastructure? Does our country look like China? Have you seen what China's building? Have you seen Japan? How about El Salvador's library? What do we have in America? So tell me this. Over the next ten years, like, who in any country around the world is really going, I wanna go on a vacation, and I wanna go to, California. I wanna go to LA. How many people did fifteen or twenty years ago? Everybody in the world. Oh, how about Maui? Oh, the fires? How about New Orleans? Nope. Vegas? Nope. Vegas? What the fuck? The Sin City? Have you seen it lately? It's a fucking ghost town. How about New York? How about Times Square? That's that's legendary. Right? Yeah. If you wanna get mugged and shanked in the neck on a bus. No. Not there either. So exactly what have we done? What have we what have we accomplished? Oh, we've made a bunch of elite assholes, most of them which are Jewish, rich as fuck. So let me let my boy Jeff just drive this back to home because he does it better than anybody. We're not getting in fucking vaded. Nobody's fucking invading America. If anybody attacks us on US soil, it's gonna be Israel, and we're gonna write raise up an army, and we're gonna go fucking to war with them, bro. We're gonna put our fucking boots on with or without our gosh damn president, and we're going to motherfucking war with Israel. I'll tell you that right gosh damn now. I am not sending my son or daughter off to fucking some fight some another war in The Middle East that has nothing to fucking do with me. And any politician, any neocon who thinks they're gonna fucking send our tax dollars, we're just gonna be good little tax little bitches and just pay your taxes, don't ask any questions, shut your mouth, be a good little bitch, and then, like, the whole Benny Johnson thing. Don't even me started on that distraction. Oh, Benny Johnson got a death threat. Bro, welcome to the fucking club, bro. Man the fuck up, dude. This is such a fucking tease. It's such a you guys are fucking facts. Dude, it's just a gay smokescreen made up. It's it's humiliating. Don't fucking humiliate us. Alright? You already do that enough. Check out my man Jess. Give this dude a follow. Speaker 1: The Zionist shills think we're all as fucking retarded as they are. They're in my comments and all over the Internet here saying, oh, if you don't you don't support Israel, then I hope you enjoy your Islamist state. And one guy's in my comments being like, oh, do you wanna be invaded by the Muslims like The UK has? Where do you think those Muslims came from? They're fucking Syrian refugees, you dipshit. And why why do you think they had to leave Syria? Oh, I don't know. Maybe because Israel's invading the southern chunk of fucking Syria right now trying to settle more land. Why? What happened to Syria's government that people needed to flee as refugees? Oh, did the CIA and Mossad overthrow the fucking government? Look at where all the fucking Muslim refugees have come from. It's all of Israel's neighbors. They have destabilized the entire fucking region, forcing all these Muslim immigrants to flee the entire area and fucking come to all the Western countries. Dude, you love your fucking Muslim invasion because you have your Zionist fuck assholes in Israel to thank for it. They're the ones pushing them out. Bibi Satan Yahoo even floated the idea. He was like, well, if if The US would just take all the Gaza refugees and take them to The US. That's what they wanted to do with them. If they couldn't kill them all, they were like, we'll round them up and we'll send them to fucking The UK and we'll send them to America. He said it with his own words, dude. You dumb fucks that sit there and fucking suck that fucking circumcised dick for fucking clipped coins and payoffs. Like, I I just got no words for you. Because, evidently, you need to get yourself a map and learn some fucking geography and understand where the fucking Muslim immigrants come from. It's from all the destabilized countries around Israel. They're the ones sending them here. The Zionists are causing the influx of Islamic fucking fucking refugees and migrants. There you go, you dummies. So if you love the fucking Islamic fucking invasion, then you go ahead and you keep supporting that Zionist bullshit and fucking wars over there. They don't protect us. They have made us more vulnerable than ever. They have what? Almost half of our THAAD missile defense battery right now over there in Israel. We can't even protect ourselves here or anywhere else we might need to because we've gotta fucking send all that shit to Israel to protect them from all the Muslims they're constantly attacking. That's why the Muslims chant death to America is because Israel's constantly bombing them with our bombs, with our planes, with our tanks, with our fucking money and weapons. Oh my god. Motherfuckers. Pull your heads from your ass and fucking look at where the problems all come from. All of our problems. Like, that is where they are fucking stemming from. Migration, fucking interest based loans. Look at go Google that when interest loans interest on loans became a fucking thing. Because it was illegal for thousands of years. A lot of cultures still today, they are it's Saudi Arabia. You know why they're so rich? Because they have banned interest on loans. Rome had a ban on interest on loans. The fucking Catholic church had a ban on interest on loans because that shit drains wealth from a society. I wonder where that idea came from. Go do some research. Good luck to you all. Do not be a fucking moron and long live this beautiful republic.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 10:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the only party that would gain from a terrorist attack on US soil is Israel, and we should be wary of those trying to persuade us otherwise. Candace's comments resonate with my thoughts on the professional nature of recent events, suggesting involvement from multiple intelligence agencies, raising questions about what the FBI might be concealing. Additionally, I find it troubling that questioning the collapse of Building Seven leads to accusations of supporting al-Qaeda. I would like to hear a solid explanation for how that building fell so precisely.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The only person who would benefit from a terrorist attack on US soil would be Israel. Pay close attention to the people who are trying to convince you otherwise. https://t.co/mHMSE8qZlm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker introduces Sarah Adams as 'TPA Sarah' and states these are alleged opinions. He claims she is 'working for' or 'a plant... a mole' in a foreign or U.S. intelligence agency, and predicts 'we're gonna see a false flag terrorist attack.' He cites Brayton Howell: 'these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country,' adding that 'the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals.' He references Sean Ryan: 'Al Qaeda actually knows about the Building 7 narrative' and that 'there was nothing suspect about Building 7 collapse.' He argues Israel is behind attacks, saying 'Israel attacked us at the USS Liberty' and 'the only person who's carrying out a terrorist attack on USA soil is gonna be fucking Israel.' He ends with 'Pipe the fuck down, Sarah.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me introduce you to Sarah Adams. She goes by TPA Sarah, Sarah Adams. Now this video is all just allegedly. Nothing stated in here as fact. These are just my opinions and what I personally think. And I'm I'm pretty sure we're still allowed to tell you guys what we think of somebody, and then I can present a little bit evidence and make you or help you understand why I think the way I think. So I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency. I think she can't be trusted. I think she's a plant. She's a mole. And I would never trust a word that she says. And I think that this we're gonna see a false flag terrorist attack. And I think that it's people like her are putting out the propaganda that's laying the groundwork for it. Now, why do I think that? Let me take you before I sow I'm gonna tell you why I'm making this video. So a name a guy named Brighton or Brayton, Brayton Howell reaches out, and he says and he says this to me in his message. He says, these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country. In in the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals. Okay. And he quotes Sarah Sarah Adams is his source. Okay. So you see how the false flag narrative is getting prop propagated. Right? So when the when Israel and Mossad carry out their next false flag attack just like they did on nine eleven, it's mouthpieces like this that are completely uneducated and completely unaware of what a Mossad agent would look like allegedly look like. So let's just check out this clip from Sean Ryan because if you remember the Sean Ryan podcast, she went on Sean Ryan and tried to convince you America that Al Qaeda actually knows about the Building 7 narrative, and they're using that to their advantage because if enough people if they can push that narrative, enough people will question their government because there was nothing suspect about Building 7 collapse, and there was definitely no explosive devices in that building. It definitely was just somehow molten lava fell out of another building and shot across the road and caught that on fire in the heat. Come on now. You gotta check this shit out. Speaker 1: Sniff. Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Build in seven people to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: You almost can't make it up, dude. Is it is she getting 7,000 to tweet? What do you guys think? I mean, how fucking crazy do these people think we actually are? How stupid do they actually think we are that we're not gonna see right through this propaganda bullshit? The the you would be a fucking moron to believe that anybody who's going to attack a Muslim is going to attack The United States because well, that worked out so well from the first time. Right? Like, we're the United States government. Like, we wanna go to war. The military industrial complex is begging for us to go to war over anything. You don't have to attacking The United States would be fucking suicide. Right? And this magically, they found the passports that flew out of the trade center, and they found them on the ground, and it was Al Qaeda. Right? So she is over here pushing the same fucking slop over and over in every podcast. And, honestly, sweetheart, that that don't look like you. You're looking a little chunky, honey. You're looking like you're putting on a lot of weight, like you're getting a little stressed out because nobody's buying your fucking slop. Alright? So why don't you just pipe down, shut the fuck up. We're done listening to your ass. The only person who's carrying out a terrorist attack on USA soil is gonna be fucking Israel, and we ain't buying it. We ain't buying in your fucking slop. We're not buying any of the documents. And put it this way, there are sleeper cells, he tells me. So let me show you this tweet. So here's what Brayton Howell sends me. He says, these are not false flag attacks. Al Qaeda is a real threat, and they have sleeper cells in the country. In the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and local hospitals. And here it is. On September 24, I literally put out a whole report on Hamas Binhilad and on 09:11 catch up. I would highly suggest that you and the people that you you care about follow Sarah. She knows what she is talking about. There are two different PDFs in those links. You can print them out and take them to your local hospital or PDF station. Email them. Take this seriously, please. Godspeed, brother. God, brother. Brother, you are fucking eating that slop up, bro. Brayton, bro. I actually like you, dude. And you sound like a really good dude who actually cares about this country. You gotta stop buying that fucking slop. If you think that Al Qaeda was behind nine eleven, bro, you need to just do a little bit of research. Tucker Carlson just put out an entire fucking documentary on it. It was fucking Israel. Israel attacked us at the USS Liberty. Israel carried out the nine eleven attacks. Israel was behind the Beirut's bearing bombings. Israel is always behind it all, and we're not sending our fucking kid kids or our children or our great grandchildren to die fighting another war for Israel. So these military industrial complex fucking neocon lunatics need to get it through our head that people like fucking Sarah, we're not buying it. We look at her as the fucking enemy. Fuck this bitch. That's my personal opinion. No facts here. Just my alleged opinion. I don't fucking like the girl. I don't trust her. I don't think her reporting holds up. She can print all the fucking PDF she wants. It's 2025, bro. I can manipulate reports. I can manipulate intel. You mean to tell me? She goes, yeah. And, actually, Al Qaeda was actually talking. What? Did you call up Al Qaeda? Were you sitting in the room? Were you at the fucking bar having a few drinks and we're just sitting there made you know, in Iraq, Afghanistan, in a in a Al Qaeda bunker with Bin Laden. Get this shit, this garbage fucking trash lady out of my fucking feed, please and thank you. So let me break this down for you, Brady. You mean to tell me that this ugly overweight chunky looking chick who looks like a fucking mix between a Karen and a soccer mom that fucking couldn't infiltrate any intelligence agency or under any underground network somehow magically is getting intel. From who? Where where is she getting this intel from? And she's getting intel that you mean that our FBI and our CIA and the most advanced intelligence agencies all around the world aren't getting, and there's somehow these magical sleeper cells that can go in undetected when we have the most advanced military. We have the best intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies have $10.20, $30,000,000,000 budgets, and they have an unlimited reach. And they have the ability with the NSA to spy on every single thing that we say, every communication device, and Larry Ellison with his AI is compiling it all together. And you mean to tell me somehow there's some magical sleeper cells that have infiltrated our country and are inside that behind enemy lines, and they're getting ready to plot this terrorist attack, and they're somehow gonna magically acquire all of the assets and all the chemicals and all the weapons and all the metal and all the shit that they need. And they're somehow gonna be able to infiltrate and get these devices into some towns, and they're gonna do this all right under the nose of the FBI, and their FBI is not gonna be involved. They're not gonna know about it. Bull fucking shit, dude. And then again, riddle me this. What would be the fucking point? What would be the point? You're gonna kill what? A thousand American citizens? Dude, a 100,000 are dying a day from fucking fentanyl. Okay? Our our country, they're killing themselves off in droves. We're bankrupt as a nation. Our our dollars collapsing. They don't have to fire a shot. So what would be the point of just poking the bear? I I just want you're gonna oh my gosh. We killed a thousand American citizen. We killed three thousand. Dude, our government killed, like, twenty million with the COVID nineteen injections, bro. They don't have to do shit. You wanna talk about a bioweapon, a a chemical attack. How about we talk about fucking COVID and doctor death, doctor Fauci, and he's still running amok? Last year, the dude was still getting a government fucking salary, and we haven't held that asshole accountable. That dude's killed more people than Al Qaeda ever will. So I don't wanna hear shit about a gosh damn false flag. Pipe the fuck down, Sarah.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace finally said what we are all thinking. This was a professional assassination that involved multiple intelligence agencies. What the hell is the FBI hiding from us? https://t.co/iXvCUOzOEc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "it's a military operation, calling out that Tyler wasn't on the roof, that he didn't take that shot, that he was involved in this, that he was dumping clothing, that this has a full intelligence, full scale military operation written all over it." "Shit stinks to high heaven," and "false flag attack is imminent, guaranteed to take place on our gov in our on USA." Speaker 1: "I actually believe that this was a military hit that involved foreign actors and also literal actors." "That day ran something akin to JFK's assassination." "there were therefore multiple decoys on the ground." "four decoys, like George Zinn, staircase guy, maroon shirt guy, and lozy center guy." "Lance Twiggs is the one that is walking in that maroon shirt." "Tyler Robinson was involved, and he was in fact driving around campus on that day, therefore assisting in the costume changes, likely picking up clothing." "Tyler was seen at Dairy Queen." "Dumping clothing in the cemetery beside that Dairy Queen." "That was his job, to get rid of clothing."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I don't know what the hell Cash Patel and our government's gonna do, but Candice is on an absolute ripper calling out this, that it's a military operation, calling out that Tyler wasn't on the roof, that he didn't take that shot, that he was involved in this, that he was dumping clothing, that this has a full intelligence, full scale military operation written all over it. And she's finally saying the exact same shit that we're all thinking, we're all feeling. Kash Patel is balls deep in this cover up. Our FBI's involved in it. Our military's involved in it. There's foreign intelligence involved in it. We can all feel it. Shit stinks to high heaven, and this is why I keep warning everybody that a false flag attack is imminent, guaranteed to take place on our gov in our on USA. So right now, the the size of the cover up that they're gonna need to make this go away and go slide under the rug is going to be so monumental. I don't think we can even wrap our heads around it. You need to check this clip out. Speaker 1: Through a a ton of the tips related to what happened. But I wanna tell you that I maintain I actually believe that this was a military hit that involved foreign actors and also literal actors. I believe that that day ran something akin to JFK's assassination. I believe that there were therefore multiple decoys on the ground. I do not believe, just so I'm clear here, that the person who was walking up the stairs killed Charlie. In fact, my suspicion is that that photo was not even shot on the same day. I do not believe that the person who ran across Loisie Rooftop killed Charlie. I think it was another decoy. I do not believe that shot came from a Loisie center at all. And I obviously we all know that decoy George Zinn didn't kill Charlie. And I received an interesting tip about him as well, that he's much more connected than what meets the surface. He potentially has connections to the federal department, familial connections to the federal department, and we are prodding that. It's getting interesting. Anyway, that would suggest that there are thus for a total of four decoys, like George Zinn, staircase guy, maroon shirt guy, and lozy center guy, none of which I believe actually pulled the trigger. Call it a hunch. I think it's much more likely that Lance Twiggs is the one that is walking in that maroon shirt. His build is nothing like Tyler Robinson's build. Lance Twiggs is thinner. And, obviously, I'm speculating here, but I believe Tyler Robinson was involved, and he was in fact driving around campus on that day, therefore assisting in the costume changes, likely picking up clothing. And as we broke the story, Tyler was seen at Dairy Queen. And what was he seen doing as I told you? Dumping clothing in the cemetery beside that Dairy Queen. So I think that is what his involvement is limited to. That was his job, to get rid of clothing. It's completely a nonsense to think that a person who had never killed anyone was high on adrenaline after a kill and decided to eat Dairy Queen. That doesn't even make sense biologically speaking. There was gonna be an adrenaline measure that kicks in after you kill a animal, let alone a person, let alone having it be your first kill. And you're like, he just decided to go to DQ, sit down, write some poetic text messages. It's why they are freaking out about that Dairy Queen leak because it disrupts their narrative. One of many things that disrupt

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s had to send out a life insurance package because she is worried that a foreign government might assassinate her on US soil. https://t.co/AOcmGhWu2y

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace Owens argued that she had to "put out a gosh damn life insurance policy" because "there's people that are actively trying to destroy you on behalf of another fucking government" who could "assassinate US citizens on US soil." She described sending "a package filled with text messages, emails, private communications, videos, and private legal documents" to trusted people so that, if anything happens to her, "you guys will know exactly who it is that has been making my life a living hell." She said "People that are trying to bankrupt me, trying to bankrupt me and my family, that are threatening us to sue us." She added, "Kanye was right" and urged, "Leave me alone. Let me say what I believe, and you say what you believe. Fight fair." She vowed to "detonate it all, expose all of these people in politics and in the movement who behave like this behind the scenes" and urged others: "Send everything around to about eight people that you trust." She claimed she "sent it to journalists, text messages, and screenshots to people ranging from Max Blumenthal to Andrew Tate. They won't know where it's coming from. It will be everywhere."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So another banger from Candace Owens. She just went on this riff about how she had to put out a life insurance policy. It's so bizarre that we live in a time in America to think that a foreign government has so much power over our government that they can come over here and assassinate US citizens on on US soil, and you have to put out a gosh damn life insurance policy because there's people that are actively trying to destroy you on behalf of another fucking government. If that doesn't make you irate as an American citizen, I don't know what will. Check this clip out. Speaker 1: To you, Josh Hammer? Did he? I'm interested. I know we won't get answers from you, but let me promise you that if I get a text message to the effect that you were somehow involved in him feeling anxiety the day before, if you did something that gave him anxiety in that way, I will release it instantly. There'll be no place that you can hide. Anyways, I want you guys to know that I was feeling so inspired by Josh Hammer's utter lack of human decency that I went ahead this week and sent around a life insurance policy of sorts of sorts, a package rather, to people that I trust, a package filled with text messages, emails, private communications, videos, and private legal documents. So if anything happens to me, you guys will know exactly who it is that has been making my life a living hell over the past couple of years. People that are trying to bankrupt me, trying to bankrupt me and my family, that are threatening us to sue us. Everything that Kanye said was so real. Okay? I'm now at that point where you look back and you go, man, Kanye was right. He was really saying something about what it takes to leave, you know, to fight for custody of your own soul. Just leave me alone. Let me say what I believe, and you say what you believe. Fight fair. Why do always have to make this threat to bankrupt people? And I want you to know that those people, if anything happens to me, they have my explicit permission to release it all, detonate it all, expose all of these people in politics and in the movement who behave like this behind the scenes. It's necessary. And I highly recommend every single person that is out there, that has a platform and is going through things and scared, do the same. Send everything around to about eight people that you trust. And I mean, I I've ranged it. I sent it to journalists, text messages, and screenshots to people ranging from Max Blumenthal to Andrew Tate. They won't know where it's coming from. It will be everywhere.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Sarah Adam think you are helping al-Qaeda if you question building seven collapsing. I would love to hear Sarah explain how this building collapse so perfectly. https://t.co/fMlI6HTDWG

Video Transcript AI Summary
What we're looking at is a building just coming straight down, falling right through itself with zero resistance. This building 40,000 tons of structural steel in its structural system and that is intended to keep it from going anywhere. I realized that it's actually coming down at free fall pretty much dead on the acceleration of gravity. Well, NIST, in their final draft, was saying that the building came down 40% longer than free fall time. A free fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it. NIST is telling us that the building below it ceased to exist for the first few seconds of the collapse of the building. The building didn't disappear so the building can fall for 100 feet at free fall speed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This building. Speaker 1: It's amazing. Speaker 2: What we're looking at is a building just coming straight down, falling right through itself with zero resistance. Buildings don't have zero resistance, which is why you feel comfortable walking into a building. Speaker 3: This building 40,000 tons of structural steel in its structural system and that is intended to keep it from going anywhere. Speaker 2: I heard people say well it came down at free fall or close to free fall and so forth so I decided to measure it myself. I had a simple at the time called Physics Toolkit, allowed me to take a video and put a dot on each frame to follow the motion of things. And I realized that it's actually coming down at free fall pretty much dead on the acceleration of gravity. Well, NIST, in their final draft, was saying that the building came down 40% longer than free fall time. Speaker 0: How can such a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity be set aside? Speaker 1: A free fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it. There was a structural resistance that was provided in this case. Speaker 2: He was making our case for us. You can't have free fall when there's support. And in the final report, they modified it and they actually admitted there was a period of free fall involved. But they never changed their model. Like how do you all of a sudden allow for free fall when they just got done explaining how it couldn't have been in free fall? Speaker 0: NIST is telling us that the building below it ceased to exist for the first few seconds of the collapse of the building. Well, things in physics just don't cease to exist and cease to resist the forces that are on them. The building didn't disappear so the building can fall for 100 feet at free fall speed. That's impossible. That's a violation of the fundamental law of physics that says that for every action there's an equal and opposite reaction. Speaker 4: If floors fall, they tend to fall and are braced by the floor directly beneath it and there's some delay there. Speaker 5: Because of redundancy, because of all the other columns in the building that were not affected. Even if a floor were to collapse, it still wouldn't be able to collapse all of the connections simultaneously at the rate that it did without secondary explosions.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 10:07 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s is looking for information on a man named Cooper Brown. If you have any information please send it to Candace’s Tip line. My DMs are also open. https://t.co/OV1f5uNbZA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace seeks help identifying Cooper Brown, the person who shoved a microphone away from a speaker at Utah Valley University's Charlie Kirk event. Brown later appeared on Fox News as eyewitness, described as a Leadership Institute volunteer who was 'feet away from Charlie' when the shot rang out and who 'held the microphone' during the event. Witnesses who 'heard multiple shots' were not given mainstream-media interviews; a viral clip shows a witness describing a gunshot and a man slumping, with skepticism about the shooter's origin. The video subject is clarified as not Andrew Colvert of Turning Point USA, and not a TPUSA employee or UVU student; instead, he is a volunteer connected to a TPUSA event, prompting questions about his background, the use of volunteers to manage microphones, and why he spoke to Fox News. Speaker asks for information from Southern New Hampshire University folks who might know Cooper Brown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, again, Candace is gonna ask for some help here. You remember Cooper Brown, the kid that was shoving the dude out of the microphone that was talking and trying to give interviews? Well, it turns out Cooper Brown went on to Fox News the next couple days and did interviews. And this guy's a PR guy, he's a political expert, and he's magically a ghost online, and nobody can find him. Candace needs your help. So check out this video. Speaker 1: Mayhem rather, there were people who were insisting, by the way, they were on the ground, the witnesses that were insisting that they heard multiple shots. It's another element of this. But those individuals were not the ones that were awarded with mainstream media interviews. In fact, one guy, and this kind of went viral at the time, even got pushed, physically pushed, and was not given the ability to speak at all. They shut him up. It looked if we were just examining the situation, it certainly looked like turning point Turning Point employees or staff or students thugged him so that he wouldn't say what he thought happened. Let's take a a listen to that clip that has gone viral. Speaker 2: I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over and he was carried off. Speaker 3: Get Speaker 2: off me. Get off off Emotions are running high right now. Speaker 1: Certainly, emotions, were running high. He was just trying to speak and to say what he saw. And interestingly, though, if you think through what he said there, he said I was in the third row. Right? And a shot rang out, and I looked to my left, and I looked to my right. Now we're not specific on where exactly he was standing. But if a shot, a high powered rifle came from 250 yards behind you, you'd probably look back first. Right? Like, common sense. If you heard the sound coming from behind you, you would look back probably even before your brain came online. Your instinct would be to duck into into make sure that you're not going to get hit by something that's coming from behind you. Now to clarify immediately here and to again debunk some other Internet conspiracy theories, that is not Andrew Colvet in that video. A lot of people were like, is this Andrew Colvet from Turning Point USA hiding under a hat? It is not true. I spoke to Andrew on this actual day. He definitively flew in to Utah after the shooting took place. He's not on therefore, on the ground. But the person that is in that video, as soon as I just put up a picture and I said, I'd like to identify this person, his friend first left a nasty comment, like, why are you trying to look out for this guy? He did the right thing. How dare we ask questions? Like, how dare we try to get testimony from anybody else that day? Kind of then messages me privately because I reached out, and I'm like, I'm just trying to confirm the story. And I reached out, and he says he says to me, well and I'm paraphrasing here. He doesn't wanna speak to you. He doesn't wanna speak to media because he's been instructed not to speak to media because he's gotten the turning point chapter into trouble before for speaking out in the media, and he just doesn't wanna do that. And I said, that seems very strange to me. What are you what are you saying to me? You have a a TP USA person who who can't speak out about things. There were tons of people that were talking about their testimonies. It's very odd. In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, you're telling me that Turning Point USA, what, sent around a text and said nobody speak to the media. That's what that was his excuse, by the way, for why he shut that guy up. People were saying, oh, you know, they're not allowed to speak to the media. So they were just doing what they were told. Well, then it's kind of interesting you should know, but I then determined that the person doing the shoving is first and foremost not a Turning Point USA employee. He's first he's he is beyond that, not a student at UVU. He is not a Turning Point USA student, therefore, either. He was actually brought in as a volunteer, which I found to be quite strange. Like, look. I've done a lot of campus stops, and, typically, it's the chapter of that school that does everything. It's it's the chapter that handles everything. Now bigger events, they certainly work with other organizations, and it's it's possible, I guess. It registered to me as odd that a volunteer would have the courage to shut down a kid that's speaking in that way, in that aggressive manner. I would imagine Turning Point would tell their volunteers not to get physical with students on campus. But what do I know? I just have common sense. Now how do I know that he is not a Turning Point USA employee and he is not a UVU or Turning Point USA student? Well, because despite him stopping a college kid from speaking about what he heard, that young man whose name is Cooper, and I'm very comfortable telling you this because, well, he went on Fox News that very night to provide eyewitness testimony to exactly what he heard and what he saw because apparently, he was the person that was holding the mic when the shot rang out. Take a listen to what he told Jesse Waters on the night of. Speaker 4: Cooper Brown was an event volunteer who was just feet away from Charlie when he got shot. Cooper, what happened? Speaker 3: Yeah. So, this requires a little bit of of background knowledge, but so I work for an organization called Leadership Institute. And what we do is we work hand in hand with all the different conservative coalition groups on college campuses. So the Young Americans for Liberty, the the Students for Life, and the Turning Point USA's. And so at Utah Valley, we had been really, really excited to be able to host Charlie Kirk, this this semester. And, we had spent weeks and weeks and weeks getting volunteers, advertising for this event, and just so excited to be able to host Charlie Kirk at this university. And then, unfortunately, it had to end in in, absolute tragedy. Speaker 1: So I'm trying to get in touch with this individual once I realized that not only did he speak the night of, he also spoke on Fox News the very next day, which would mean what did Turning Point USA I don't know the answer to this. I'm asking genuinely. Did they say speak to this person who's not actually a TP USA student, but he was there? I I don't know how this works. But the next day, sure enough, he appeared on Fox News again. And I'm not sure if we had that clip, Skyler, but if we do, let's roll it. Speaker 3: That day up, we had 30 or so student volunteers that were designated roles that were gonna be helping pass out Turning Point USA merchandise and getting people signed up for the event. And my responsibility was when the event actually started to help manage just the microphone. So something simple as just raising it and lowering it, making sure students were able to speak into it clearly. And I thought this was a fantastic opportunity, to be up really, really close, to be able to witness all the amazing dialogue that what's gonna be happening on campus. Speaker 1: Couple of things about Cooper Brown that to me is a bit of a mystery at this moment. First and foremost, you provide witness testimony. You start doing the rounds on Fox News. You are fair game. Okay? I'm going to start asking questions because I need to know everything. Everything's gotta fit neatly into my timeline. So in trying to reach out to him and and in publicly posting, hey. I'm trying to identify this individual. I received a ton of emails. One email said, hey. I'm actually his cousin, and here is his number. Now I noticed that that cousin happens to live in Phoenix, Arizona. So I went and just checked some profiles on social media. I found some Browns, but they were all living in Phoenix, Arizona. Okay. Maybe this person's from Phoenix, Arizona. Well, actually, when I went through what he has as his resume on the on this website where he says that he works with this institute, I could in fact check any of the things. Went to school, a minor a very small college in New Hampshire. I'm from the Northeast. If you're going to school in New Hampshire, especially not the University of New Hampshire, you can go ahead and bet that you're gonna be a local. So I'm looking for a kid that's from New Hampshire to go to this tiny school. I found someone from that name with his name, but it was actually a girl that had that name and graduated in the year that he says he graduated in. He doesn't look to me like he just graduated college, but according to his resume, he did. And the number that she gives me, which is the first thing that registers me registers me as odd, is it's a Utah. I mean I I mean sorry. It's a it's it's a Phoenix based number. So I'm going, who is this person, and why is it linking that number to somebody else who is 32 years old and has that same last name? I don't know. I intend to get those answers, but there's something here that strikes me as a little bit odd, especially given the fact that as a volunteer, as he expresses there, they decided to allow him to hold the microphone. That's supposed to be, like, kind of an honor at Utah events. Turning Point USA kids work really hard to put these events on. They decide who's gonna hold the microphone. They went with a volunteer. I don't know, but I'm gonna find out. Okay? I don't know, but I'm going to find out. So if you went to the Southern New Hampshire University with this Cooper Brown and you majored with him in politics and you can provide some insight, I'd like to hear from you. I am, again, asking these questions publicly because we are getting no answers from Turning Point USA or the feds or anything that makes any practical sense in this scenario. Why was everything so brand new on this day? Now for Speaker 0: those

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Wait, the kid who was debating Charlie Kirk when he got shot, was caught practicing how he was going to react to Charlie Kirk being assassinated before Charlie Kirk was even shot. https://t.co/UvtYgUUjoo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The clip alleges: “the kid that was actually talking to Charlie Kirk when he got assassinated” was “prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot.” It centers on Hunter Kozak: “Steve Kozak, the father of Hunter Kozak has been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years,” and claims Hunter asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question “right before Charlie Kirk's life is taken in front of a live audience full of thousands of people,” with Jimmy Kimmel then scapegoated by the media for his monologue. It adds that “one of the higher ups at Jimmy Kimmel's show is the father of the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk.” The same kid allegedly belongs to the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour and plotted to go undercover to ask those questions. Destiny said: “Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms.” Destiny added: “Need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events.” The claim ends with: the dude threatening to assassinate Charlie Kirk has a kid in the Unfuck America tour front row meeting Kirk moments before the assassination, and the FBI doesn't wanna question either of these people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big shout out to my buddy, Ben Werman over here. He dropped some alpha. I don't know if you've seen the kid that was actually talking to Charlie Kirk when he got assassinated, but it looks like he was actually prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot. Check out this video. Speaker 1: Steve Kozak, the father of Hunter Kozak has been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years. What are the chances that Hunter Kozak asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question right before Charlie Kirk's life is taken in front of a live audience full of thousands of people. Jimmy Kimmel then gets brought into this by the media simultaneously dogpiling on him and making him the scapegoat because of his monologue. And then it turns out that one of the higher ups at Jimmy Kimmel's show is the father of the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: And did you know the same kid is part of the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour and that he had this whole thing plotted out that he knew Charlie Kirk was coming and he was planning how he was gonna go undercover and get in front of Charlie Kirk and actually get to ask those questions, check this out. Speaker 2: Now while I was scrolling Charlie Kirk's video, I noticed that he was touring America, and he was touring universities specifically. And one of these caught my eye because one of these is the university I'm currently going to. Speaker 0: And do you remember when Destiny said this about Charlie Kirk? Speaker 3: Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms. Speaker 0: Well, maybe Destiny was just upset. Maybe that was just a one bad day. Right? Speaker 3: I hate Charlie Kirk. I think he's actually a saint spawn, but he's very, very strategically minded. Speaker 0: Hey. May maybe it was just twice. Never a third time, though. Right? Speaker 3: Need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Speaker 0: Wait. So you mean to tell me the dude that's literally been basically pretty much threatening to assassinate Charlie Kirk has a kid that's part of his Unfuck America tour and is pretty much the spokesperson for it is front row speaking to Charlie Kirk when he gets assassinated practicing, how he was gonna be responding to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated moments before it happened, and the FBI doesn't wanna question either of these people. Go figure.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The evidence that Mossad is planning on carrying out a massive terrier attack on US soil is becoming overwhelming. https://t.co/X4D1RBnQtL

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 to make them blame their government more. So they're actually looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack." "You had mentioned before that they are coordinating terrorist, sleeper sales in America, and they wanna do a October 7 style attack." "One's a large aviation plot again, and that they're just gonna do suicide bombers on planes and drop them down, and that's for mass casualty. The goal is to kill 4,000 people." "Get a phone call from a previous intelligence officer this morning, and she starts explaining how this chick is a complete fraud." "Everything's said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account over here, guys."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you this, America. This is Sarah Adams. She's the woman who went on the Sean Ryan podcast and tried to convince you that if you question or you talk about Building 7 collapsing and you think there's a conspiracy theorist, you're actually helping out. You're working for Al Qaeda. You're actually doing the bidding of Al Qaeda. Qaeda. Speaker 1: Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: That's what miss Sarah Adams told you. And remember how I told you I thought she was a Mossad asset? Check out the video they just posted just a minute ago. Check this out. Speaker 2: You had mentioned before that they are coordinating terrorist, sleeper sales in America, and they wanna do a October 7 style attack. What does that look like? I mean, I I don't think they could take people hostage like they did in October 7. Is it just a mass casualty situation, or do they think they're gonna take land? You know, are they gonna take a a small town? Or, you know, what what do you think that's all about? Speaker 3: So what we've seen at least with the plotting, I'd say there's three pieces. One's a large aviation plot again, and that they're just gonna do suicide bombers on planes and drop them down, and that's for mass casualty. The goal is to kill 4,000 people. Then they want something like you said about almost hostage in the whole ground. That seems to be some sort of assault or attack on Washington DC because they want to cripple the federal government's response. And then the last piece, they are gonna go into our communities, unfortunately, like it was for October 7. ISIS is leading that piece, and they're highly trained is in five to 10 man kind of urban assault teams, and they're gonna attack, like, churches, supermarkets, hospitals, and they're gonna do multiple locations at a time, so that'll be very difficult for law enforcement. And they're also going to either target law enforcement or look like law enforcement to fool civilians, which they also did that during the October. Speaker 0: Wasn't this what we were warning you guys was coming already that Israel was gonna be carrying out a false flag attack at hospitals and they're gonna be dressed up like police officers? Looks like Sarah of Rumpy Muffin over here is a little bit late to the party. So we got Benjamin Netanyahu's house bitch. For your Jewish masters like Brandon here, come take the influencer trip to Israel. And then we got this chick who literally is like, she's definitely not a honeypot. Okay? We won't even go there because nobody wants that. Karen, take it easy. Okay? Get a phone call from a previous intelligence officer this morning, and she starts explaining how this chick is a complete fraud. And what she says is that she's basically got friends that are over in Pakistan because she did a little bit of time over there in the CIA, and it's a Pakistani organization called the NRF. Right? So what she has these Pakistanis do is she they she tells them exactly what she wants in these reports. And then they go out and create these reports. They collect the data, and it's from The Middle East. It's from Pakistan, from Afghanistan, whatever, but it's all fraudulent. It's all just fake made up bullshit so that she sounds relevant, and then she takes this intel, and then she feeds it into our intelligence agency. So I don't know if she's playing them or if they're playing her, if it's all one big circle jerk with Netanyahu and it's Mossad. I don't know. But I can tell you, ask her for some proof. Ask her for some evidence, the actual real data, real evidence, real documents, not some shit that anybody could fucking make up on fucking Photoshop. Right? I wanna see actual proof. Where's an intel? You think frumpy muffin over here, fatty cakes, fatty McMuffin over here, the Pillsbury Dough chick, actually is going over to Afghanistan in Pakistan? You think she's gonna blend in where she can't even fit in the cave? What the fuck? Fraud. Fraud. That's just my opinion. Everything's said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account over here, guys. Just a shit professional trailer park shit poster. I'm your boy. We out.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 10:07 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just claimed that Andrew Kolvet lied about speaking with the doctor who preformed the autopsy on Charlie Kirk. The man of steal line and the magic bullet was a complete lie. https://t.co/0hV1gHj6el

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker asserts new information about Charlie Kirk's neck injury: "the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle" and "the bullet absolutely should have gone through" though "Charlie's body stopped it." "The coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin." He states, "Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit" and "a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck." He adds, "They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six" and, "There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six." The discussion emphasizes validating evidence and debunking theories, noting that "the injury ... went in here" in line with the shoulder blade and that the investigation considers a different weapon theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pretty sure those are fight words, Andrew. So what is this that Candice is telling us now that the autopsy, the report from the doctors that Andrew Colville told us about Charlie Kirk being the man of steel, that's all just what? All bullshit? You guys are gonna wanna see this. Check this clip out. Speaker 1: Tell you right at the top, I can't tell you exactly who the information came from or which parties were involved in giving me this information because I don't wanna get anybody in trouble. But I can say that I have positively verified something about the injury that Charlie sustained to his neck that I think is going to go a very long way in terms of helping those of us who have been sleuthing, those of us who want answers, those of us who are dedicating our time to this because what we are being told by the authorities, beggars belief, As John and Irina Mappin said, it just simply beggars belief. We also want to make sure that we are presenting evidence and debunking one another where we can so that all of us can collectively zero in and build upon whatever facts we have in this decentralized investigation. This is about the injury. Okay? So Andrew Colvet was, I can tell you, telling the truth in part when he wrote that very long tweet in which he tried to explain why there was no exit wound. Do you recall this? Long story short, he said, I'm gonna read it. I want to address some of the things that the lack of an exit wound, about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I'm usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize that this is somewhat graphic. But in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know. I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital. He said the bullet absolutely should have gone through, which is very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down an elk, etcetera, but it didn't go through. Charlie's body stopped it. I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied, it was an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed. His bone was so healthy, and the density was so, so impressive that he's like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too. In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous. Now keep that up for just a second because it's really around here. His bone was so healthy, and the density was so, so impressive that he's like the man of steel that we just went, something's not right. Something not right. A lot of stuff is not right, but I just don't know why a surgeon would be saying something that actually only the medical examiner, somebody that specializes in forensics could really contribute. Yes, a surgeon can tell you or actually, any person with common sense can tell you that your bone density is better when you're younger, but this seemed a little bit too performative. Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question. Okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. And I'm going to tell you exactly where it was recovered from. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now. I've actually been sitting on this, for a little bit over a week. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center. Now why is that helpful? Because it gives us a bullet trajectory. Okay? Went in here where you saw that, and it was stopped and a fragment was pulled from, think, if you're just touching your spine in line with your shoulder blade. That leads us obviously to the part that he's maybe not being forthcoming about. They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn't recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. This didn't happen. Okay? They had found a 30 odd six bullets. Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that. In suicide in suicide situations, that's just one example, medical examiners feel free to chime in. I've spoken to quite a few. But when the gun and the bullet are known, they are reflected onto the death certificate. Okay? There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right. You're absolutely right. And this is why I hate politics because it requires us to submit to the idea that we were all somehow born yesterday. That it really can just life really can just be a Marvel comic with people that are, I guess, a DC comic where there are men of steel that are able, because they're young, to stop 3,000 pounds of energy that is coming at them. That didn't happen. So where does that leave us guys? Well, the part that is now extraordinarily suspicious is that Andrew has claimed that he had a conversation with the surgeon who offered up the idea that it really was just your modern Christian miracle. And Charlie was just young and his bones had a lot of density, which made him stronger somehow than a cape buffalo. Enough push ups in asparagus, and you too can stop 3,000 pounds of energy coming at you. What are we to make of that? What are we to make of the fact that Charlie did not do that, actually? It means that he was shot with a completely different kind of gun, obviously. Okay? The kind where this would make sense that it didn't cut through him. The kind where it would make sense that outside of an artery effectively exploding from the front, there was you know, his neck didn't explode, which that particular weapon that they were trying to tell us Charlie was killed with would have gone through about seven necks. Okay?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s is looking for information on a man named Cooper Brown. If you have any information please send it to Candace’s Tip line. My DMs are also open. https://t.co/OV1f5uNbZA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace asks for help identifying Cooper Brown, the kid who shoved the microphone away from a speaker, who later appeared on Fox News. He’s described as a PR guy and a political expert, and as 'magically a ghost online, and nobody can find him.' The video notes witnesses insisting multiple shots were heard, including a man shoved as he tried to speak. He says: 'I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward.' The shover is described as not a Turning Point USA employee or UVU student, but a volunteer who later spoke to Fox News. The speaker questions Cooper’s identity and seeks answers from Turning Point USA and asks for information from Southern New Hampshire University contacts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, again, Candace is gonna ask for some help here. You remember Cooper Brown, the kid that was shoving the dude out of the microphone that was talking and trying to give interviews? Well, it turns out Cooper Brown went on to Fox News the next couple days and did interviews. And this guy's a PR guy, he's a political expert, and he's magically a ghost online, and nobody can find him. Candace needs your help. So check out this video. Speaker 1: Mayhem rather, there were people who were insisting, by the way, they were on the ground, the witnesses that were insisting that they heard multiple shots. It's another element of this. But those individuals were not the ones that were awarded with mainstream media interviews. In fact, one guy, and this kind of went viral at the time, even got pushed, physically pushed, and was not given the ability to speak at all. They shut him up. It looked if we were just examining the situation, it certainly looked like turning point Turning Point employees or staff or students thugged him so that he wouldn't say what he thought happened. Let's take a a listen to that clip that has gone viral. Speaker 2: I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over and he was carried off. Speaker 3: Get Speaker 2: off me. Get off off Emotions are running high right now. Speaker 1: Certainly, emotions, were running high. He was just trying to speak and to say what he saw. And interestingly, though, if you think through what he said there, he said I was in the third row. Right? And a shot rang out, and I looked to my left, and I looked to my right. Now we're not specific on where exactly he was standing. But if a shot, a high powered rifle came from 250 yards behind you, you'd probably look back first. Right? Like, common sense. If you heard the sound coming from behind you, you would look back probably even before your brain came online. Your instinct would be to duck into into make sure that you're not going to get hit by something that's coming from behind you. Now to clarify immediately here and to again debunk some other Internet conspiracy theories, that is not Andrew Colvet in that video. A lot of people were like, is this Andrew Colvet from Turning Point USA hiding under a hat? It is not true. I spoke to Andrew on this actual day. He definitively flew in to Utah after the shooting took place. He's not on therefore, on the ground. But the person that is in that video, as soon as I just put up a picture and I said, I'd like to identify this person, his friend first left a nasty comment, like, why are you trying to look out for this guy? He did the right thing. How dare we ask questions? Like, how dare we try to get testimony from anybody else that day? Kind of then messages me privately because I reached out, and I'm like, I'm just trying to confirm the story. And I reached out, and he says he says to me, well and I'm paraphrasing here. He doesn't wanna speak to you. He doesn't wanna speak to media because he's been instructed not to speak to media because he's gotten the turning point chapter into trouble before for speaking out in the media, and he just doesn't wanna do that. And I said, that seems very strange to me. What are you what are you saying to me? You have a a TP USA person who who can't speak out about things. There were tons of people that were talking about their testimonies. It's very odd. In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, you're telling me that Turning Point USA, what, sent around a text and said nobody speak to the media. That's what that was his excuse, by the way, for why he shut that guy up. People were saying, oh, you know, they're not allowed to speak to the media. So they were just doing what they were told. Well, then it's kind of interesting you should know, but I then determined that the person doing the shoving is first and foremost not a Turning Point USA employee. He's first he's he is beyond that, not a student at UVU. He is not a Turning Point USA student, therefore, either. He was actually brought in as a volunteer, which I found to be quite strange. Like, look. I've done a lot of campus stops, and, typically, it's the chapter of that school that does everything. It's it's the chapter that handles everything. Now bigger events, they certainly work with other organizations, and it's it's possible, I guess. It registered to me as odd that a volunteer would have the courage to shut down a kid that's speaking in that way, in that aggressive manner. I would imagine Turning Point would tell their volunteers not to get physical with students on campus. But what do I know? I just have common sense. Now how do I know that he is not a Turning Point USA employee and he is not a UVU or Turning Point USA student? Well, because despite him stopping a college kid from speaking about what he heard, that young man whose name is Cooper, and I'm very comfortable telling you this because, well, he went on Fox News that very night to provide eyewitness testimony to exactly what he heard and what he saw because apparently, he was the person that was holding the mic when the shot rang out. Take a listen to what he told Jesse Waters on the night of. Speaker 4: Cooper Brown was an event volunteer who was just feet away from Charlie when he got shot. Cooper, what happened? Speaker 3: Yeah. So, this requires a little bit of of background knowledge, but so I work for an organization called Leadership Institute. And what we do is we work hand in hand with all the different conservative coalition groups on college campuses. So the Young Americans for Liberty, the the Students for Life, and the Turning Point USA's. And so at Utah Valley, we had been really, really excited to be able to host Charlie Kirk, this this semester. And, we had spent weeks and weeks and weeks getting volunteers, advertising for this event, and just so excited to be able to host Charlie Kirk at this university. And then, unfortunately, it had to end in in, absolute tragedy. Speaker 1: So I'm trying to get in touch with this individual once I realized that not only did he speak the night of, he also spoke on Fox News the very next day, which would mean what did Turning Point USA I don't know the answer to this. I'm asking genuinely. Did they say speak to this person who's not actually a TP USA student, but he was there? I I don't know how this works. But the next day, sure enough, he appeared on Fox News again. And I'm not sure if we had that clip, Skyler, but if we do, let's roll it. Speaker 3: That day up, we had 30 or so student volunteers that were designated roles that were gonna be helping pass out Turning Point USA merchandise and getting people signed up for the event. And my responsibility was when the event actually started to help manage just the microphone. So something simple as just raising it and lowering it, making sure students were able to speak into it clearly. And I thought this was a fantastic opportunity, to be up really, really close, to be able to witness all the amazing dialogue that what's gonna be happening on campus. Speaker 1: Couple of things about Cooper Brown that to me is a bit of a mystery at this moment. First and foremost, you provide witness testimony. You start doing the rounds on Fox News. You are fair game. Okay? I'm going to start asking questions because I need to know everything. Everything's gotta fit neatly into my timeline. So in trying to reach out to him and and in publicly posting, hey. I'm trying to identify this individual. I received a ton of emails. One email said, hey. I'm actually his cousin, and here is his number. Now I noticed that that cousin happens to live in Phoenix, Arizona. So I went and just checked some profiles on social media. I found some Browns, but they were all living in Phoenix, Arizona. Okay. Maybe this person's from Phoenix, Arizona. Well, actually, when I went through what he has as his resume on the on this website where he says that he works with this institute, I could in fact check any of the things. Went to school, a minor a very small college in New Hampshire. I'm from the Northeast. If you're going to school in New Hampshire, especially not the University of New Hampshire, you can go ahead and bet that you're gonna be a local. So I'm looking for a kid that's from New Hampshire to go to this tiny school. I found someone from that name with his name, but it was actually a girl that had that name and graduated in the year that he says he graduated in. He doesn't look to me like he just graduated college, but according to his resume, he did. And the number that she gives me, which is the first thing that registers me registers me as odd, is it's a Utah. I mean I I mean sorry. It's a it's it's a Phoenix based number. So I'm going, who is this person, and why is it linking that number to somebody else who is 32 years old and has that same last name? I don't know. I intend to get those answers, but there's something here that strikes me as a little bit odd, especially given the fact that as a volunteer, as he expresses there, they decided to allow him to hold the microphone. That's supposed to be, like, kind of an honor at Utah events. Turning Point USA kids work really hard to put these events on. They decide who's gonna hold the microphone. They went with a volunteer. I don't know, but I'm gonna find out. Okay? I don't know, but I'm going to find out. So if you went to the Southern New Hampshire University with this Cooper Brown and you majored with him in politics and you can provide some insight, I'd like to hear from you. I am, again, asking these questions publicly because we are getting no answers from Turning Point USA or the feds or anything that makes any practical sense in this scenario. Why was everything so brand new on this day? Now for Speaker 0: those

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Wait, the kid who was debating Charlie Kirk when he got shot, was caught practicing how he was going to react to Charlie Kirk being assassinated before Charlie Kirk was even shot. https://t.co/FZuxLHaegM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ben Werman dropped some alpha. A video alleges the kid who spoke to Charlie Kirk as he was assassinated was “prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot.” Steve Kozak, Hunter Kozak's father, has worked for Jimmy Kimmel for years; the clip claims Hunter Kozak asked Kirk a very ironic question right before Kirk's life is taken on a live audience, and that a Jimmy Kimmel higher-up is the father of the last person to speak to Kirk. The same kid is part of the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour and “had this whole thing plotted out that he knew Charlie Kirk was coming and he was planning how he was gonna go undercover and get in front of Charlie Kirk and actually get to ask those questions.” Destiny said: “Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big shout out to my buddy, Ben Werman over here. He dropped some alpha. I don't know if you've seen the kid that was actually talking to Charlie Kirk when he got assassinated, but it looks like he was actually prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot. Check out this video. Speaker 1: Steve Kozak, the father of Hunter Kozak has been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years. What are the chances that Hunter Kozak asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question right before Charlie Kirk's life is taken in front of a live audience full of thousands of people. Jimmy Kimmel then gets brought into this by the media simultaneously dogpiling on him and making him the scapegoat because of his monologue. And then it turns out that one of the higher ups at Jimmy Kimmel's show is the father of the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: And did you know the same kid is part of the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour and that he had this whole thing plotted out that he knew Charlie Kirk was coming and he was planning how he was gonna go undercover and get in front of Charlie Kirk and actually get to ask those questions, check this out. Speaker 2: Now while I was scrolling Charlie Kirk's video, I noticed that he was touring America, and he was touring universities specifically. And one of these caught my eye because one of these is the university I'm currently going to. Speaker 0: And do you remember when Destiny said this about Charlie Kirk? Speaker 3: Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms. Speaker 0: Well, maybe Destiny was just upset. Maybe that was just a one bad day. Right? Speaker 3: I hate Charlie Kirk. I think he's actually a saint spawn, but he's very, very strategically minded. Speaker 0: Hey. May maybe it was just twice. Never a third time, though. Right? Speaker 3: Need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Speaker 0: Wait. So you mean to tell me the dude that's literally been basically pretty much threatening to assassinate Charlie Kirk has a kid that's part of his Unfuck America tour and is pretty much the spokesperson for it is front row speaking to Charlie Kirk when he gets assassinated practicing, how he was gonna be responding to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated moments before it happened, and the FBI doesn't wanna question either of these people. Go figure.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 10:01 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The evidence that Mossad is planning on carrying out a massive terrier attack on US soil is becoming overwhelming. https://t.co/r6bS45hUx5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 summarizes claims from a Sean Ryan podcast by Sarah Adams, who allegedly said that questioning Building 7 or discussing its collapse means you’re helping Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda supposedly finds Building 7 conspiracy topics fascinating and has discussed ruses to blame the government, and Sarah Adams is described as a Mossad asset. The discussion outlines three plotting components: (1) a large aviation plot with suicide bombers aiming to kill about 4,000; (2) a Washington, DC ground assault to cripple the federal government’s response; (3) ISIS-led urban attacks on churches, supermarkets, and hospitals with five-to-ten person teams, at multiple locations, possibly impersonating law enforcement. There’s a claim Israel would carry out a false flag attack at hospitals dressed as police. A prior intelligence source calls the woman a fraud, alleging NRF Pakistanis fabricate intel. Everything’s said in this video is allegedly. I’m a parody account.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you this, America. This is Sarah Adams. She's the woman who went on the Sean Ryan podcast and tried to convince you that if you question or you talk about Building 7 collapsing and you think there's a conspiracy theorist, you're actually helping out. You're working for Al Qaeda. You're actually doing the bidding of Al Qaeda. Qaeda. Speaker 1: Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: That's what miss Sarah Adams told you. And remember how I told you I thought she was a Mossad asset? Check out the video they just posted just a minute ago. Check this out. Speaker 2: You had mentioned before that they are coordinating terrorist, sleeper sales in America, and they wanna do a October 7 style attack. What does that look like? I mean, I I don't think they could take people hostage like they did in October 7. Is it just a mass casualty situation, or do they think they're gonna take land? You know, are they gonna take a a small town? Or, you know, what what do you think that's all about? Speaker 3: So what we've seen at least with the plotting, I'd say there's three pieces. One's a large aviation plot again, and that they're just gonna do suicide bombers on planes and drop them down, and that's for mass casualty. The goal is to kill 4,000 people. Then they want something like you said about almost hostage in the whole ground. That seems to be some sort of assault or attack on Washington DC because they want to cripple the federal government's response. And then the last piece, they are gonna go into our communities, unfortunately, like it was for October 7. ISIS is leading that piece, and they're highly trained is in five to 10 man kind of urban assault teams, and they're gonna attack, like, churches, supermarkets, hospitals, and they're gonna do multiple locations at a time, so that'll be very difficult for law enforcement. And they're also going to either target law enforcement or look like law enforcement to fool civilians, which they also did that during the October. Speaker 0: Wasn't this what we were warning you guys was coming already that Israel was gonna be carrying out a false flag attack at hospitals and they're gonna be dressed up like police officers? Looks like Sarah of Rumpy Muffin over here is a little bit late to the party. So we got Benjamin Netanyahu's house bitch. For your Jewish masters like Brandon here, come take the influencer trip to Israel. And then we got this chick who literally is like, she's definitely not a honeypot. Okay? We won't even go there because nobody wants that. Karen, take it easy. Okay? Get a phone call from a previous intelligence officer this morning, and she starts explaining how this chick is a complete fraud. And what she says is that she's basically got friends that are over in Pakistan because she did a little bit of time over there in the CIA, and it's a Pakistani organization called the NRF. Right? So what she has these Pakistanis do is she they she tells them exactly what she wants in these reports. And then they go out and create these reports. They collect the data, and it's from The Middle East. It's from Pakistan, from Afghanistan, whatever, but it's all fraudulent. It's all just fake made up bullshit so that she sounds relevant, and then she takes this intel, and then she feeds it into our intelligence agency. So I don't know if she's playing them or if they're playing her, if it's all one big circle jerk with Netanyahu and it's Mossad. I don't know. But I can tell you, ask her for some proof. Ask her for some evidence, the actual real data, real evidence, real documents, not some shit that anybody could fucking make up on fucking Photoshop. Right? I wanna see actual proof. Where's an intel? You think frumpy muffin over here, fatty cakes, fatty McMuffin over here, the Pillsbury Dough chick, actually is going over to Afghanistan in Pakistan? You think she's gonna blend in where she can't even fit in the cave? What the fuck? Fraud. Fraud. That's just my opinion. Everything's said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account over here, guys. Just a shit professional trailer park shit poster. I'm your boy. We out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The only person who would benefit from a terrorist attack on US soil would be Israel. Pay close attention to the people who are trying to convince you otherwise. https://t.co/mHMSE8qZlm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker introduces Sarah Adams (TPA Sarah) and states the video presents opinion: "These are just my opinions and what I personally think." They claim, "I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency... She's a mole." They warn of a forthcoming false flag terrorist attack and say the propaganda from people like her lays the groundwork for it. Brayton Howell messages that "these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country." He links "actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals," citing Sarah Adams as his source. They reference a Sean Ryan clip where she allegedly argued that "Al Qaeda knows about the Building 7 narrative." The host doubts the claims, questions sleeper cells' plausibility, and asserts the only people who would attack USA soil would be Israel. No facts here; just my alleged opinion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me introduce you to Sarah Adams. She goes by TPA Sarah, Sarah Adams. Now this video is all just allegedly. Nothing stated in here as fact. These are just my opinions and what I personally think. And I'm I'm pretty sure we're still allowed to tell you guys what we think of somebody, and then I can present a little bit evidence and make you or help you understand why I think the way I think. So I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency. I think she can't be trusted. I think she's a plant. She's a mole. And I would never trust a word that she says. And I think that this we're gonna see a false flag terrorist attack. And I think that it's people like her are putting out the propaganda that's laying the groundwork for it. Now, why do I think that? Let me take you before I sow I'm gonna tell you why I'm making this video. So a name a guy named Brighton or Brayton, Brayton Howell reaches out, and he says and he says this to me in his message. He says, these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country. In in the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals. Okay. And he quotes Sarah Sarah Adams is his source. Okay. So you see how the false flag narrative is getting prop propagated. Right? So when the when Israel and Mossad carry out their next false flag attack just like they did on nine eleven, it's mouthpieces like this that are completely uneducated and completely unaware of what a Mossad agent would look like allegedly look like. So let's just check out this clip from Sean Ryan because if you remember the Sean Ryan podcast, she went on Sean Ryan and tried to convince you America that Al Qaeda actually knows about the Building 7 narrative, and they're using that to their advantage because if enough people if they can push that narrative, enough people will question their government because there was nothing suspect about Building 7 collapse, and there was definitely no explosive devices in that building. It definitely was just somehow molten lava fell out of another building and shot across the road and caught that on fire in the heat. Come on now. You gotta check this shit out. Speaker 1: Sniff. Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Build in seven people to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: You almost can't make it up, dude. Is it is she getting 7,000 to tweet? What do you guys think? I mean, how fucking crazy do these people think we actually are? How stupid do they actually think we are that we're not gonna see right through this propaganda bullshit? The the you would be a fucking moron to believe that anybody who's going to attack a Muslim is going to attack The United States because well, that worked out so well from the first time. Right? Like, we're the United States government. Like, we wanna go to war. The military industrial complex is begging for us to go to war over anything. You don't have to attacking The United States would be fucking suicide. Right? And this magically, they found the passports that flew out of the trade center, and they found them on the ground, and it was Al Qaeda. Right? So she is over here pushing the same fucking slop over and over in every podcast. And, honestly, sweetheart, that that don't look like you. You're looking a little chunky, honey. You're looking like you're putting on a lot of weight, like you're getting a little stressed out because nobody's buying your fucking slop. Alright? So why don't you just pipe down, shut the fuck up. We're done listening to your ass. The only person who's carrying out a terrorist attack on USA soil is gonna be fucking Israel, and we ain't buying it. We ain't buying in your fucking slop. We're not buying any of the documents. And put it this way, there are sleeper cells, he tells me. So let me show you this tweet. So here's what Brayton Howell sends me. He says, these are not false flag attacks. Al Qaeda is a real threat, and they have sleeper cells in the country. In the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and local hospitals. And here it is. On September 24, I literally put out a whole report on Hamas Binhilad and on 09:11 catch up. I would highly suggest that you and the people that you you care about follow Sarah. She knows what she is talking about. There are two different PDFs in those links. You can print them out and take them to your local hospital or PDF station. Email them. Take this seriously, please. Godspeed, brother. God, brother. Brother, you are fucking eating that slop up, bro. Brayton, bro. I actually like you, dude. And you sound like a really good dude who actually cares about this country. You gotta stop buying that fucking slop. If you think that Al Qaeda was behind nine eleven, bro, you need to just do a little bit of research. Tucker Carlson just put out an entire fucking documentary on it. It was fucking Israel. Israel attacked us at the USS Liberty. Israel carried out the nine eleven attacks. Israel was behind the Beirut's bearing bombings. Israel is always behind it all, and we're not sending our fucking kid kids or our children or our great grandchildren to die fighting another war for Israel. So these military industrial complex fucking neocon lunatics need to get it through our head that people like fucking Sarah, we're not buying it. We look at her as the fucking enemy. Fuck this bitch. That's my personal opinion. No facts here. Just my alleged opinion. I don't fucking like the girl. I don't trust her. I don't think her reporting holds up. She can print all the fucking PDF she wants. It's 2025, bro. I can manipulate reports. I can manipulate intel. You mean to tell me? She goes, yeah. And, actually, Al Qaeda was actually talking. What? Did you call up Al Qaeda? Were you sitting in the room? Were you at the fucking bar having a few drinks and we're just sitting there made you know, in Iraq, Afghanistan, in a in a Al Qaeda bunker with Bin Laden. Get this shit, this garbage fucking trash lady out of my fucking feed, please and thank you. So let me break this down for you, Brady. You mean to tell me that this ugly overweight chunky looking chick who looks like a fucking mix between a Karen and a soccer mom that fucking couldn't infiltrate any intelligence agency or under any underground network somehow magically is getting intel. From who? Where where is she getting this intel from? And she's getting intel that you mean that our FBI and our CIA and the most advanced intelligence agencies all around the world aren't getting, and there's somehow these magical sleeper cells that can go in undetected when we have the most advanced military. We have the best intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies have $10.20, $30,000,000,000 budgets, and they have an unlimited reach. And they have the ability with the NSA to spy on every single thing that we say, every communication device, and Larry Ellison with his AI is compiling it all together. And you mean to tell me somehow there's some magical sleeper cells that have infiltrated our country and are inside that behind enemy lines, and they're getting ready to plot this terrorist attack, and they're somehow gonna magically acquire all of the assets and all the chemicals and all the weapons and all the metal and all the shit that they need. And they're somehow gonna be able to infiltrate and get these devices into some towns, and they're gonna do this all right under the nose of the FBI, and their FBI is not gonna be involved. They're not gonna know about it. Bull fucking shit, dude. And then again, riddle me this. What would be the fucking point? What would be the point? You're gonna kill what? A thousand American citizens? Dude, a 100,000 are dying a day from fucking fentanyl. Okay? Our our country, they're killing themselves off in droves. We're bankrupt as a nation. Our our dollars collapsing. They don't have to fire a shot. So what would be the point of just poking the bear? I I just want you're gonna oh my gosh. We killed a thousand American citizen. We killed three thousand. Dude, our government killed, like, twenty million with the COVID nineteen injections, bro. They don't have to do shit. You wanna talk about a bioweapon, a a chemical attack. How about we talk about fucking COVID and doctor death, doctor Fauci, and he's still running amok? Last year, the dude was still getting a government fucking salary, and we haven't held that asshole accountable. That dude's killed more people than Al Qaeda ever will. So I don't wanna hear shit about a gosh damn false flag. Pipe the fuck down, Sarah.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace finally said what we are all thinking. This was a professional assassination that involved multiple intelligence agencies. What the hell is the FBI hiding from us? https://t.co/N20dlWbvjJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candice is calling it a military operation, saying Tyler wasn't on the roof, didn't take the shot, and dumped clothing. She asserts intelligence involvement and warns of a false-flag attack in the USA; the FBI, the military, and foreign intelligence are involved, making the cover-up monumental. Another speaker believes this was a military hit with foreign actors, with multiple decoys on the ground. He says the person who walked up the stairs didn’t kill Charlie, and the photo and the Loisy rooftop shot were not on the same day; decoys include George Zinn, staircase guy, maroon shirt guy, Lozy center guy. He pins Lance Twiggs as the maroon-shirt wearer and suspects Tyler Robinson was involved, driving for costume changes and dumping clothing in the cemetery beside Dairy Queen; Tyler was seen at Dairy Queen. The dumping of clothing is described as his job; the Dairy Queen leak disrupts their narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I don't know what the hell Cash Patel and our government's gonna do, but Candice is on an absolute ripper calling out this, that it's a military operation, calling out that Tyler wasn't on the roof, that he didn't take that shot, that he was involved in this, that he was dumping clothing, that this has a full intelligence, full scale military operation written all over it. And she's finally saying the exact same shit that we're all thinking, we're all feeling. Kash Patel is balls deep in this cover up. Our FBI's involved in it. Our military's involved in it. There's foreign intelligence involved in it. We can all feel it. Shit stinks to high heaven, and this is why I keep warning everybody that a false flag attack is imminent, guaranteed to take place on our gov in our on USA. So right now, the the size of the cover up that they're gonna need to make this go away and go slide under the rug is going to be so monumental. I don't think we can even wrap our heads around it. You need to check this clip out. Speaker 1: Through a a ton of the tips related to what happened. But I wanna tell you that I maintain I actually believe that this was a military hit that involved foreign actors and also literal actors. I believe that that day ran something akin to JFK's assassination. I believe that there were therefore multiple decoys on the ground. I do not believe, just so I'm clear here, that the person who was walking up the stairs killed Charlie. In fact, my suspicion is that that photo was not even shot on the same day. I do not believe that the person who ran across Loisie Rooftop killed Charlie. I think it was another decoy. I do not believe that shot came from a Loisie center at all. And I obviously we all know that decoy George Zinn didn't kill Charlie. And I received an interesting tip about him as well, that he's much more connected than what meets the surface. He potentially has connections to the federal department, familial connections to the federal department, and we are prodding that. It's getting interesting. Anyway, that would suggest that there are thus for a total of four decoys, like George Zinn, staircase guy, maroon shirt guy, and lozy center guy, none of which I believe actually pulled the trigger. Call it a hunch. I think it's much more likely that Lance Twiggs is the one that is walking in that maroon shirt. His build is nothing like Tyler Robinson's build. Lance Twiggs is thinner. And, obviously, I'm speculating here, but I believe Tyler Robinson was involved, and he was in fact driving around campus on that day, therefore assisting in the costume changes, likely picking up clothing. And as we broke the story, Tyler was seen at Dairy Queen. And what was he seen doing as I told you? Dumping clothing in the cemetery beside that Dairy Queen. So I think that is what his involvement is limited to. That was his job, to get rid of clothing. It's completely a nonsense to think that a person who had never killed anyone was high on adrenaline after a kill and decided to eat Dairy Queen. That doesn't even make sense biologically speaking. There was gonna be an adrenaline measure that kicks in after you kill a animal, let alone a person, let alone having it be your first kill. And you're like, he just decided to go to DQ, sit down, write some poetic text messages. It's why they are freaking out about that Dairy Queen leak because it disrupts their narrative. One of many things that disrupt
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 9:55 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Wait, the kid who was debating Charlie Kirk when he got shot, was caught practicing how he was going to react to Charlie Kirk being assassinated before Charlie Kirk was even shot. https://t.co/UvtYgUUjoo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ben Werman drops some alpha, noting "the kid that was actually talking to Charlie Kirk when he got assassinated, but it looks like he was actually prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot." Speaker 1 says Steve Kozak, father of Hunter Kozak, "has been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years" and asks "What are the chances that Hunter Kozak asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question right before Charlie Kirk's life is taken in front of a live audience full of thousands of people," adding that "one of the higher ups at Jimmy Kimmel's show is the father of the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk." The same kid is described as "part of the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour" and that he "had this whole thing plotted out that he knew Charlie Kirk was coming and he was planning how he was gonna go undercover and get in front of Charlie Kirk." Destiny is quoted: "Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms." The FBI doesn't wanna question either of these people. Go figure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big shout out to my buddy, Ben Werman over here. He dropped some alpha. I don't know if you've seen the kid that was actually talking to Charlie Kirk when he got assassinated, but it looks like he was actually prepping for his actual reaction prior to Charlie Kirk getting shot. Check out this video. Speaker 1: Steve Kozak, the father of Hunter Kozak has been working for Jimmy Kimmel for years. What are the chances that Hunter Kozak asks Charlie Kirk a very ironic question right before Charlie Kirk's life is taken in front of a live audience full of thousands of people. Jimmy Kimmel then gets brought into this by the media simultaneously dogpiling on him and making him the scapegoat because of his monologue. And then it turns out that one of the higher ups at Jimmy Kimmel's show is the father of the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: And did you know the same kid is part of the Un Fuck America tour destinies tour and that he had this whole thing plotted out that he knew Charlie Kirk was coming and he was planning how he was gonna go undercover and get in front of Charlie Kirk and actually get to ask those questions, check this out. Speaker 2: Now while I was scrolling Charlie Kirk's video, I noticed that he was touring America, and he was touring universities specifically. And one of these caught my eye because one of these is the university I'm currently going to. Speaker 0: And do you remember when Destiny said this about Charlie Kirk? Speaker 3: Conservatives have been disgusting for years, which is why I don't give a fuck about anybody that winds up at any of these rallies and gets shot or whatever the fuck. Okay? Because they had no problem making fun of Paul Pelosi. The entire world would be better off if these people were permanently removed from these platforms. Speaker 0: Well, maybe Destiny was just upset. Maybe that was just a one bad day. Right? Speaker 3: I hate Charlie Kirk. I think he's actually a saint spawn, but he's very, very strategically minded. Speaker 0: Hey. May maybe it was just twice. Never a third time, though. Right? Speaker 3: Need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events. Speaker 0: Wait. So you mean to tell me the dude that's literally been basically pretty much threatening to assassinate Charlie Kirk has a kid that's part of his Unfuck America tour and is pretty much the spokesperson for it is front row speaking to Charlie Kirk when he gets assassinated practicing, how he was gonna be responding to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated moments before it happened, and the FBI doesn't wanna question either of these people. Go figure.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The evidence that Mossad is planning on carrying out a massive terrier attack on US soil is becoming overwhelming. https://t.co/r6bS45hUx5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sarah Adams claims that if you question Building 7 or discuss a conspiracy, you’re 'actually helping out. You're working for Al Qaeda.' She says 'Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating' and that 'they're actually looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack.' The discussion outlines three plotting elements: a large aviation plot to kill 4,000; an assault on Washington DC to cripple the federal government's response; and ISIS-led urban assaults on churches, supermarkets, hospitals at multiple locations, with possible targeting of law enforcement or impersonating them. A claim that Israel would carry out a false flag attack at hospitals dressed as police is raised. A caller labels Sarah a fraud, cites NRF in Pakistan fabricating reports, and says she feeds fake intel to intelligence agencies, asking for proof. 'Everything’s said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you this, America. This is Sarah Adams. She's the woman who went on the Sean Ryan podcast and tried to convince you that if you question or you talk about Building 7 collapsing and you think there's a conspiracy theorist, you're actually helping out. You're working for Al Qaeda. You're actually doing the bidding of Al Qaeda. Qaeda. Speaker 1: Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: That's what miss Sarah Adams told you. And remember how I told you I thought she was a Mossad asset? Check out the video they just posted just a minute ago. Check this out. Speaker 2: You had mentioned before that they are coordinating terrorist, sleeper sales in America, and they wanna do a October 7 style attack. What does that look like? I mean, I I don't think they could take people hostage like they did in October 7. Is it just a mass casualty situation, or do they think they're gonna take land? You know, are they gonna take a a small town? Or, you know, what what do you think that's all about? Speaker 3: So what we've seen at least with the plotting, I'd say there's three pieces. One's a large aviation plot again, and that they're just gonna do suicide bombers on planes and drop them down, and that's for mass casualty. The goal is to kill 4,000 people. Then they want something like you said about almost hostage in the whole ground. That seems to be some sort of assault or attack on Washington DC because they want to cripple the federal government's response. And then the last piece, they are gonna go into our communities, unfortunately, like it was for October 7. ISIS is leading that piece, and they're highly trained is in five to 10 man kind of urban assault teams, and they're gonna attack, like, churches, supermarkets, hospitals, and they're gonna do multiple locations at a time, so that'll be very difficult for law enforcement. And they're also going to either target law enforcement or look like law enforcement to fool civilians, which they also did that during the October. Speaker 0: Wasn't this what we were warning you guys was coming already that Israel was gonna be carrying out a false flag attack at hospitals and they're gonna be dressed up like police officers? Looks like Sarah of Rumpy Muffin over here is a little bit late to the party. So we got Benjamin Netanyahu's house bitch. For your Jewish masters like Brandon here, come take the influencer trip to Israel. And then we got this chick who literally is like, she's definitely not a honeypot. Okay? We won't even go there because nobody wants that. Karen, take it easy. Okay? Get a phone call from a previous intelligence officer this morning, and she starts explaining how this chick is a complete fraud. And what she says is that she's basically got friends that are over in Pakistan because she did a little bit of time over there in the CIA, and it's a Pakistani organization called the NRF. Right? So what she has these Pakistanis do is she they she tells them exactly what she wants in these reports. And then they go out and create these reports. They collect the data, and it's from The Middle East. It's from Pakistan, from Afghanistan, whatever, but it's all fraudulent. It's all just fake made up bullshit so that she sounds relevant, and then she takes this intel, and then she feeds it into our intelligence agency. So I don't know if she's playing them or if they're playing her, if it's all one big circle jerk with Netanyahu and it's Mossad. I don't know. But I can tell you, ask her for some proof. Ask her for some evidence, the actual real data, real evidence, real documents, not some shit that anybody could fucking make up on fucking Photoshop. Right? I wanna see actual proof. Where's an intel? You think frumpy muffin over here, fatty cakes, fatty McMuffin over here, the Pillsbury Dough chick, actually is going over to Afghanistan in Pakistan? You think she's gonna blend in where she can't even fit in the cave? What the fuck? Fraud. Fraud. That's just my opinion. Everything's said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account over here, guys. Just a shit professional trailer park shit poster. I'm your boy. We out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The only person who would benefit from a terrorist attack on US soil would be Israel. Pay close attention to the people who are trying to convince you otherwise. https://t.co/QTB2qNHKxr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker introduces Sarah Adams as 'TPA Sarah' and states everything is opinion, not fact. He claims, "I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency," that she is a "plant" and a "mole." He predicts a forthcoming "false flag terrorist attack" and says people like her are propagating propaganda. He recounts Brayton Howell’s message: "these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat," with "the links" being "actual reports" to distribute to local law enforcement and hospitals, and that Adams is "his source." He cites a Sean Ryan clip alleging Al Qaeda knows the Building 7 conspiracy and discusses using conspiracies to blame the government. He condemns the claims, mocks Adams, and asserts "Israel" behind various attacks, saying "we're not buying" the documents, while mentioning "sleeper cells" and printable PDFs for hospitals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me introduce you to Sarah Adams. She goes by TPA Sarah, Sarah Adams. Now this video is all just allegedly. Nothing stated in here as fact. These are just my opinions and what I personally think. And I'm I'm pretty sure we're still allowed to tell you guys what we think of somebody, and then I can present a little bit evidence and make you or help you understand why I think the way I think. So I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency. I think she can't be trusted. I think she's a plant. She's a mole. And I would never trust a word that she says. And I think that this we're gonna see a false flag terrorist attack. And I think that it's people like her are putting out the propaganda that's laying the groundwork for it. Now, why do I think that? Let me take you before I sow I'm gonna tell you why I'm making this video. So a name a guy named Brighton or Brayton, Brayton Howell reaches out, and he says and he says this to me in his message. He says, these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country. In in the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals. Okay. And he quotes Sarah Sarah Adams is his source. Okay. So you see how the false flag narrative is getting prop propagated. Right? So when the when Israel and Mossad carry out their next false flag attack just like they did on nine eleven, it's mouthpieces like this that are completely uneducated and completely unaware of what a Mossad agent would look like allegedly look like. So let's just check out this clip from Sean Ryan because if you remember the Sean Ryan podcast, she went on Sean Ryan and tried to convince you America that Al Qaeda actually knows about the Building 7 narrative, and they're using that to their advantage because if enough people if they can push that narrative, enough people will question their government because there was nothing suspect about Building 7 collapse, and there was definitely no explosive devices in that building. It definitely was just somehow molten lava fell out of another building and shot across the road and caught that on fire in the heat. Come on now. You gotta check this shit out. Speaker 1: Sniff. Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Build in seven people to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. Speaker 0: You almost can't make it up, dude. Is it is she getting 7,000 to tweet? What do you guys think? I mean, how fucking crazy do these people think we actually are? How stupid do they actually think we are that we're not gonna see right through this propaganda bullshit? The the you would be a fucking moron to believe that anybody who's going to attack a Muslim is going to attack The United States because well, that worked out so well from the first time. Right? Like, we're the United States government. Like, we wanna go to war. The military industrial complex is begging for us to go to war over anything. You don't have to attacking The United States would be fucking suicide. Right? And this magically, they found the passports that flew out of the trade center, and they found them on the ground, and it was Al Qaeda. Right? So she is over here pushing the same fucking slop over and over in every podcast. And, honestly, sweetheart, that that don't look like you. You're looking a little chunky, honey. You're looking like you're putting on a lot of weight, like you're getting a little stressed out because nobody's buying your fucking slop. Alright? So why don't you just pipe down, shut the fuck up. We're done listening to your ass. The only person who's carrying out a terrorist attack on USA soil is gonna be fucking Israel, and we ain't buying it. We ain't buying in your fucking slop. We're not buying any of the documents. And put it this way, there are sleeper cells, he tells me. So let me show you this tweet. So here's what Brayton Howell sends me. He says, these are not false flag attacks. Al Qaeda is a real threat, and they have sleeper cells in the country. In the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and local hospitals. And here it is. On September 24, I literally put out a whole report on Hamas Binhilad and on 09:11 catch up. I would highly suggest that you and the people that you you care about follow Sarah. She knows what she is talking about. There are two different PDFs in those links. You can print them out and take them to your local hospital or PDF station. Email them. Take this seriously, please. Godspeed, brother. God, brother. Brother, you are fucking eating that slop up, bro. Brayton, bro. I actually like you, dude. And you sound like a really good dude who actually cares about this country. You gotta stop buying that fucking slop. If you think that Al Qaeda was behind nine eleven, bro, you need to just do a little bit of research. Tucker Carlson just put out an entire fucking documentary on it. It was fucking Israel. Israel attacked us at the USS Liberty. Israel carried out the nine eleven attacks. Israel was behind the Beirut's bearing bombings. Israel is always behind it all, and we're not sending our fucking kid kids or our children or our great grandchildren to die fighting another war for Israel. So these military industrial complex fucking neocon lunatics need to get it through our head that people like fucking Sarah, we're not buying it. We look at her as the fucking enemy. Fuck this bitch. That's my personal opinion. No facts here. Just my alleged opinion. I don't fucking like the girl. I don't trust her. I don't think her reporting holds up. She can print all the fucking PDF she wants. It's 2025, bro. I can manipulate reports. I can manipulate intel. You mean to tell me? She goes, yeah. And, actually, Al Qaeda was actually talking. What? Did you call up Al Qaeda? Were you sitting in the room? Were you at the fucking bar having a few drinks and we're just sitting there made you know, in Iraq, Afghanistan, in a in a Al Qaeda bunker with Bin Laden. Get this shit, this garbage fucking trash lady out of my fucking feed, please and thank you. So let me break this down for you, Brady. You mean to tell me that this ugly overweight chunky looking chick who looks like a fucking mix between a Karen and a soccer mom that fucking couldn't infiltrate any intelligence agency or under any underground network somehow magically is getting intel. From who? Where where is she getting this intel from? And she's getting intel that you mean that our FBI and our CIA and the most advanced intelligence agencies all around the world aren't getting, and there's somehow these magical sleeper cells that can go in undetected when we have the most advanced military. We have the best intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies have $10.20, $30,000,000,000 budgets, and they have an unlimited reach. And they have the ability with the NSA to spy on every single thing that we say, every communication device, and Larry Ellison with his AI is compiling it all together. And you mean to tell me somehow there's some magical sleeper cells that have infiltrated our country and are inside that behind enemy lines, and they're getting ready to plot this terrorist attack, and they're somehow gonna magically acquire all of the assets and all the chemicals and all the weapons and all the metal and all the shit that they need. And they're somehow gonna be able to infiltrate and get these devices into some towns, and they're gonna do this all right under the nose of the FBI, and their FBI is not gonna be involved. They're not gonna know about it. Bull fucking shit, dude. And then again, riddle me this. What would be the fucking point? What would be the point? You're gonna kill what? A thousand American citizens? Dude, a 100,000 are dying a day from fucking fentanyl. Okay? Our our country, they're killing themselves off in droves. We're bankrupt as a nation. Our our dollars collapsing. They don't have to fire a shot. So what would be the point of just poking the bear? I I just want you're gonna oh my gosh. We killed a thousand American citizen. We killed three thousand. Dude, our government killed, like, twenty million with the COVID nineteen injections, bro. They don't have to do shit. You wanna talk about a bioweapon, a a chemical attack. How about we talk about fucking COVID and doctor death, doctor Fauci, and he's still running amok? Last year, the dude was still getting a government fucking salary, and we haven't held that asshole accountable. That dude's killed more people than Al Qaeda ever will. So I don't wanna hear shit about a gosh damn false flag. Pipe the fuck down, Sarah.
Saved - October 9, 2025 at 10:55 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just destroyed Dinesh D’Souza. It looks like someone has a closet bestiality fetish! https://t.co/XMBdVR75yU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker recounts Candace Owens roasting Dinesh, including a segment about "fucking farm animals" and "what's on your laptop? And they're most likely blackmailing you about." They note the Zionist lobby hates me and Tucker Carlson—"the hatred is deep. It's sinister. It's evil." The speaker describes a "blitzkrieg" of attacks, and Dinesh D'Souza's tweet claiming Candace is a freak show, likening it to "driving on the highway and seeing a farmer having sex with a sheep." Ishaar Ali responds, arguing this is not about Candace Owens but what they're saying. The speaker then attacks Dinesh as "Israel's bitch" and "Netanyahu's little house bitch" and "fetch that water," accusing him of being influenced by Netanyahu. They criticize D'Souza's films, call him "weak," and end: "You're obviously being blackmailed... Everything in this video is just allegedly... We're still Americans."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know if you guys got to see it, but Candace Owens just roasted Dinesh. We've been roasting Dinesh all week. If you guys aren't following this channel, you should just hit that subscribe button now because you're gonna be in for a fucking hoot. I'm telling you guys what. So Dinesh and Susie was talking about fucking farm animals and how when he drives by and watches a farmer fucking an animal, he just can't stop watching. And Candace Owens goes, it's not we don't wanna hear we wanna hear what you think, Dinesh. You know what's on your laptop? And they're most likely blackmailing you about Speaker 1: The overwhelming majority of them. And that's what sucks when corporate, people at the top take a direction, those people get no say. This investigation is being assisted by Turning Point USA. Not the execs, but Turning Point people on the ground, people that they don't even think about, smaller employees. They deeply care about what has happened. They deeply care about finding answers regarding what happened to Charlie Kirk. And so we never want to paint a broad picture that this is turning point. So the top is most certainly not the bottom. And somebody was saying, if this, what you're doing destroys Turning Point USA? And I said, you know what? This is what I always say. If the truth is capable of destroying your company, the truth, then does your company deserve to exist? Think about that. If if I'm like if people learn the truth about how Candace Owens treats her employees, Candace Owens isn't gonna have a career. If people learn the truth about what Candace Owens does on the weekends, it will destroy her career. Like, that probably means that you're not a good person or you're not a good company if the truth is a threat to you. I've heard this argument over and over. I've never been fearful. And obviously, I'm kind of constantly going through a public X-ray, a public X-ray of my life. People examine me. I'm never fearful because I think I'm a decent person. I live honorably. Do I make mistakes? Yes, I own my mistakes immediately. And I will be very quick to apologize to people when I get things wrong. But I'm not an evil person, Nowhere near an evil person, and I always try to be honest. And so do not concern yourselves with people that feel threatened by truth. That's ridiculous. Anyway, speaking of which, obviously, you can see right now the Zionist lobby hates me and Tucker Carlson. It is like nothing anybody has ever seen in their lives. This past year, they've really upped the ante on trying to destroy me and Tucker Carlson. The hatred is deep. It's sinister. It's evil. And they have sent virtually every foot soldier that they have available to attack us repeatedly. Right? Attack us repeatedly. Make videos. People it's confusing. What is it? Is she lying? Why is she saying this? Is this the right time? It's actually getting quite boring, I think. It's a little boring. I would almost describe their strategy as blitzkrieg. I don't wanna be accused of being a Nazi for using these two German words, Blitzkrieg. But it has been something like bombardment a bombardment. And this morning, they sent out Dinesh D'Souza after me. It was very, very convincing, by the way. He sent out a tweet to convince people that they shouldn't watch me. He said, I can't comment on Candace because it's quite obviously a freak show. It's like driving on the highway and seeing a farmer having sex with a sheep. You don't want to look, but you can't look away either. The problems begin when you try to analyze it. It is what it is. And I love that Ishaar Ali replies and says, this is what I mean. These are the people who are supposed to be combating Candace Owens. Instead, they tweet stuff like this. Yeah. Hi, Dinesh. Kinda weird, man. We cannot relate. I gotta tell you, if I ever was in this awful scenario where I saw a farmer trying to have sex with the sheep, I feel very much that I could not only look away, but I could call the police. Okay? So if that's kind of what you're selling you know how, like, when you can't look away from bestiality? Dinesh, you wanna know your opinion on me, not what's on your laptop and how they maybe blackmailed you. Okay? That's not what we're interested in, Dinesh D'Souza. And he's like, well, I meant that as a joke. You didn't mean as a joke. You went it seriously, and it was weird. It got weird very quickly. And we learned more about you than we learned about me. That seems to be the circumstance. It's like a complete boomerang. But, yeah, this is they're really starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel and finding people that are in some weird stuff. So I would say, think Janesh Shouza. If he thought that that was gonna be relatable and convince people, yeah, I totally relate. Yeah. It's like, could just can't look away from that stuff when you see it. I that did not happen. That did not happen. Now Speaker 0: So I don't know if you've seen Dinesh's page this week, but he is literally Israel's bitch. I don't know where a fucking little Indian dude he's not American. Let's let's just say that out there, dude. You're not fucking American. You weren't raised with American values. You might be a citizen, but you're not fucking one of us. You're not naturally born here. So why don't you just shut the fuck up before I put you in your place? Oh, wait. We're gonna do that right now. So stay tuned. So Dinesh, this guy is literally the biggest fucking Israel show. Let me actually just show you his page really quick. Dude, you are Netanyahu's little house bitch. You go get his fetch that water. Fetch that water, boy. Go get me another water. That's what fucking Netanyahu's over here. You are his house bitch, bro. How do you look at this? Look at this soft little weak little coward of a man. This dude is worth fucking millions of dollars. He's put out, like, six or eight documentaries, and they're all seem like they're financed by a fucking foreign intelligence agency. Every single one of his films. From 2,000 mules, was fucking weak, it did absolutely nothing, and he didn't fucking hold the stones to go fucking all the way with it. Police state, don't even get me started on that bitch ass little film. We had January sixers rotting in fucking jail cells, and you're interviewing fucking politicians like, oh, how can I stroke your ego? Fucking Jim Jordan. Let's just make sure you write another strong worded letter. Jim Jordan. Dude, it's you monotone little fucking Indian rat bastard. Yeah. I can't wait to catch this in your fucking headlines, you faggot. So check this out. Netanyahu brings the point home that many people are judging Israel by standards that they do not apply to or any other country. Isn't it pretty good working definition of anti Semite? Bitch, anti Semite my fucking balls. Okay? We are so sick of this fucking this like, you're gonna like, you're like, we're fucking blind. Like, you haven't been slaughtering and genociding innocent women and children. The entire world has watched it on four k, and you're gonna fucking lecture us. Like, look at this tweet. A perfect example. She goes, I will never wonder how the holocaust occurred. We are watching it in real time what it means to be weak, corrupt, or in some case evil. Bitch, your fucking country is genociding an entire you're ethnically cleansing, and that's why Charlie Kirk was telling you guys to fucking pound sand. And Dinesh is, later, the enablers will say, wait. We never said go out and exterminate the Jews. We had no idea why our admirals or whatever support this. In fact, we suspect it was the Israel government that orchestrated it to discredit us. Shut the fuck up, dude. You guys have been slaughtering, bombing everything fucking around you. Netanyahu or not Yenya, net faggot, I should say. Dinesh D'Souza, why don't you go fucking back to Israel? Why don't you go suck fucking Netanyahu's dick? You're obviously being blackmailed like a little fucking bitch. And everything in this video is just allegedly. Nothing is fact. I'm just saying my opinion. We're still Americans. We can say our fucking opinion because the first amendment allows me to say this to you. Fuck you, Dinesh. You piece of shit, little bitch.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Did you know? While millions of American families drown in debt, on the brink of bankruptcy and losing their homes over skyrocketing bills, Israeli mothers rake in monthly checks for every baby they have? Mothers are paid by the Israeli government via direct deposit on the 20th of every month. This continues until the child turns 18.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Everything stated in this video is just allegedly. There's no facts. This is just my personal opinion of who I think is a complete dirtbag grifter, and his name is Dinesh D'Souza. Charlie Kirk turns down a $150,000,000 offer for Benjamin Netanyahu because Benjamin Netanyahu wanted him to defend Israel against Tucker Carlson. "The problem with Tucker is not that he's bad for Israel. He's bad for Trump and MAGA. He's trying to rip MAGA apart ideology and generationally." Says, I don't know his motives, but who can be blind to the effects in his actions? And who benefits? The left or is the Islamic jihadist? Israel mothers and families in general receive a monthly child allowance from the government through the National Insurance Institute, the whatever this is called, after having a baby. This benefit is paid automatically for each child under the age of 18 regardless of family income and typically deposited into the mother's bank account on the twentieth of each month. Come to The US and receive our organs. Free organ transplants, free health care. Why don't we schedule that debate live on stage at the Turning Point USA event? The next Turning Point USA event's in December. Why don't him and Dinesh debate live in front of the entire world?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything stated in this video is just allegedly. There's no facts. This is just my personal opinion of who I think is a complete dirtbag grifter, and his name is Dinesh D'Souza. You know what Charlie Kirk turned down? Charlie Kirk turned down a $150,000,000 offer for Benjamin Netanyahu because Benjamin Netanyahu wanted him to defend Israel against Tucker Carlson. Let me read this tweet for you really quick. Okay. So Dinesh D'Souza says, the problem with Tucker is not that he's bad for Israel. He's bad for Trump and MAGA. He's trying to rip MAGA apart ideology and generationally. Says, I don't know his motives, but who can be blind to the effects in his actions? And who benefits? The left or is the Islamic jihadist? Now I wanna show you a few things about Israel that you most likely don't know. Check this video out. Speaker 1: Did you know that in Israel, when you have a baby, you get a check, and then that baby gets a check every month until it's 18 put into the mother's bank account? It's our tax dollars. Speaker 0: So I said, Grok, do Israel and mothers get a check from the government every month after they've had a baby? Yes. Israel mothers and families in general receive a monthly child allowance from the government through the National Insurance Institute, the whatever this is called, after having a baby. This benefit is paid automatically for each child under the age of 18 regardless of family income and typically deposited into the mother's bank account on the twentieth of each month. So let me get this right. Charlie Kirk turns down a $150,000,000 offer from Benjamin Netanyahu. If Benjamin if Charlie Kirk would attack Tucker Carlson and defend Israel against Tucker's attacks. And now who's defending Israel against Tucker's attacks? How much money do you think that this dude is getting paid from APAC in the Israel lobbies? Or do you think they're just funding his films and supporting his work? Either way, I think this dude is a dirtbag grease greaseball grifter, and I don't think you should watch his films. I don't think anybody should watch that trash because it's Israeli propaganda, and it's designed to brainwash you into thinking that it's okay that you should send your children off to war to die fighting for Israel. Did you know that forty eight hours prior to Charlie Kirk taking a bullet to his throat, he wrote a letter to all the most powerful Jewish donors and told them that he was gonna completely cut ties with Israel? Speaker 2: Unless it is true that there was a big, big, big payday that was on the line. And if Charlie radically stated that he was done with Israel, if if Charlie said he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause because of, and I quote, Jewish donors, the behavior of Jewish donors. If he said that, yes or no, well then, I don't know, maybe maybe some people didn't wanna take that risk that he was kinda what? Become Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA with all of those, so much presence across college campuses. Maybe they didn't wanna take a chance. You see, I'm just one person, so it's easy to just try to cancel my life and lie on me every second of every day. But Turning Point USA, I think got a little bit bigger than Charlie, and I'm no longer gonna allow this lie in this narrative. So answer the questions, yes or no. And I'm going to again challenge you to lie. And if you do lie, I'm gonna expose the lies and I'm gonna start dropping videos actually. So that's where I'm at. Enough of the games, enough with trying to allow Israel to wrangle a narrative that you know is not true. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. In fact, the friends of Israel were pressuring him. Speaker 0: What if I told you that American citizens who sit on the organ transplant list for year after year after year waiting for that magical organ? What if I told you that there might be a little bit more to the story and there might be a reason why you're waiting? What if I told you that Israelis got to go to the front of the bus? What if I told you that Israelis also got it for free? Yeah. That's right. Free organ transplants, free health care while you peasants and you slaves work twenty hours or work an extra twenty hours a week on top of your forty hours just to keep a roof over your kid's head and you're so stressed out that your body's literally developing cancer because you don't know how you're gonna pay your bills and get through life. Check this out. Speaker 3: Come to The US and receive our organs. Okay. This is actually insane. I don't think we'll realize how connected The US and Israel are. Not only does US give Israel billions of dollars every year that helps fund their free health care. Meanwhile Americans do not receive free health care in The US, but that was just a travel nurse who worked on an organization floor in The US. And she said that what she learned, like, through her experience working on that floor was that Israelis can come to The US for free and receive any medical procedure if the hospital in The US is better or offer something that they can't get in Israel, or if they need an organ donation, they can receive American organ donations and they can come to The US and everything's paid for. Their flights paid for, their hospital stay, their medical procedure, everything is free. Meanwhile, if an American were to get an organ donation, it could cost them $70,000 in medical bills for being in the hospital, but an Israeli will get it for free. And she also said, like, at any given time, this floor would be half Israelis at this hospital. And she thinks that Israelis might be fast tracked because she talked to one patient who had a heart and a lung transplant. And within a week of being in The US, she was getting her donation. Meanwhile, like, Americans could be on this list for years to wait for a match or wait to get a transplant. That's just this is just insane. It's crazy to me that Americans are struggling to pay for health care, but Israelis can come and get medical procedures for free. Like, how does that make any sense? When Americans are paying their taxes and the money is going towards their health care system as well as Israel's health care system, how can Israelis get free health care in Israel and The US? Like, how how does that make any sense? Speaker 0: So how about this big shot, Dinesh? You're calling out Tucker Carlson saying you wanna debate Tucker. Why don't we do this? Why don't we schedule that debate live on stage at the Turning Point USA event? The next Turning Point USA event's in December. I heard Tucker's headlining it. You know what would be great after his headline? Why don't him and Dinesh debate live in front of the entire world? And let's broadcast that everywhere. How about that, Dinesh?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

I am sick and tired of being lectured by rich, elite, pricks like Dinesh D'Souza. Standing against Israels genocide is not anti American. It’s pro humanity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 attacks Dinesh D'Souza and an unknown figure, calling them 'elite ivory towers' and noting D'Souza 'made six documentaries' and has a 'membership at Mar a Lago' costing '$250,000.' They deride 'low peasant trailer park trash' and say '53% of my paycheck' goes to a government 'inject my children with deadly bio fucking weapons,' adding that 'The only one who's actually seems like they're holding their own... is Bobby Kennedy.' Speaker 1 warns that 'those guys are trying to take MAGA out' the MAGA coalition that included 'Elon Musk and Joe Rogan and Tulsi and Bobby and me.' Speaker 2 argues 'this is a gift to radical Islam because Israel is fighting radical Islam' and cautions against breaking 'our alliance with Israel,' noting 'I'm Christian, I'm not Jewish' and 'Our family has been giving a $100 a year to Jerusalem for biblical archaeology.' Speaker 0 blasts 'Israel is a terrorist state' and condemns the administration for 'selling us out to Israel' and criticizes the films as ineffective, ending with 'Pipe down.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So I wanna play this video between Dinesh D'Souza and some dude I've never heard of. But so these are these are the type of people that live in their elite ivory towers. I just wanna kinda set the stage there. Right? Dinesh D'Souza, don't really know where this guy came from. I kinda looked into his background a little bit. Seemed like he was an absolute nobody. Came out of nowhere, and then all of a sudden has made six documentaries, and he now has a membership at Mar a Lago. And if I'm not mistaken, just the membership alone at Mar a Lago, just for your club dues is like $250,000. So these people live in a reality and live in a world that is so far above us low peasant trailer park trash pieces of shit. That's what they pretty much consider us. Like you low IQ individuals, you guys are such trailer park trash that you're a fucking your opinion doesn't matter squat. Right? To them, to these rich elite, like once you hit a certain threshold of wealth, normal society doesn't matter to you. You can travel anywhere, you can buy anything you want, you can take advantage of any business opportunity. You're generating so much wealth off the in the off the interest of your assets that you never have to work a day for the rest of your life. You don't have to clean your yard. You don't have to cut your grass. You don't have to clean the house. You don't have to fold your laundry. Your slaves do that for you because you generate so much wealth that you don't have to operate in the same realm as us fucking peasants. So when I hear these people lecture us about we're destroying MAGA, listen here, Dinesh, you little fucking jeep rap piece of shit. We don't wanna work fucking seventy hours a week. I don't wanna work till I'm 70 because I'm giving 53% of my fucking paycheck to a government that's trying to inject my children with deadly bio fucking weapons. The only one who's actually seems like they're holding their own in this administration is Bobby Kennedy. Speaker 1: What I would want the president to be aware of right now is that those guys are trying to take MAGA out. The thing that created the MAGA that brought in Elon Musk and Joe Rogan and Tulsi and Bobby and me and all these people, that's the thing they're trying to destroy, and I wonder if he's aware of that. Speaker 2: You are right that, first of all, this is a gift to radical Islam because Israel is fighting radical Islam. If you go and you want to break down Israel, break down our alliance with Israel, you are helping the Islamic radicals and the jihadis. There's no other way to look at it. But when something is threatening to drive a wedge right through the MAGA coalition, so it's bad for MAGA, it's bad for the country. And I want to emphasize it's bad for America first, you know. I think one of the reasons I'm getting a lot of attack right now and people are really desperate to show, Hey Dinesh, are you bidding $7,000 for this post? They're desperate to say that I'm And somehow being paid, I say, Listen, number one, you know, I'm Christian, I'm not Jewish. Number two, I've never made a film about Israel. I'm clearly not obsessed with the topic. This is the first time I've even talked about it in thirty years. Yeah. Our family has been giving a $100 a year to Jerusalem for biblical archaeology for the last three years. We're going to continue doing it. So I'm like, really? I mean, I'm not on Israel's payroll. I mean, it's probably more accurate to say Israel is so on my stop with the $7,000 madness. I don't have a dog in the fight in that sense, But I think for that exact reason, people find it hard to believe that I would be so pro Israel, and my reasons for being so are America first. Speaker 0: Fucking go about lecturing me from your ivory tower about how me not wanting to support Israel's genocide and their slaughtering of 83% of the fucking casualties are innocent women and children, you dickbag. So being against slaughtering, ethnic cleansing of a race in a country that was never theirs, doesn't belong to them, and you're gonna give me some type of religious moral high standard or high ground about how Israel has the right to defend itself. Israel is a terrorist state. Just like American the American government's a terrorist state. Our government has gone around the world and wreaked havoc and destroyed and slaughtered and devastated and overthrown governments and carried out regime changes, and we are fucking sick of it, Dinesh. So don't go on about lecturing me about your weak ass fucking documentaries. Police date, what a fucking pussy fart documentary that was, dude. You have this power. You have a direct ear to the president, and you have the ability to change the fucking world with your films. And instead of making films that actually fucking forced this administration to put people in handcuffs, you make the pussy as fucking police state film when we have January rotting in fucking jail cells. And then you go out and make documentaries to literally stroke Trump's ego. Who the fuck does this dude think he is lecturing me? You, the American people. You don't even look like you're from fucking America. So save me the lecture, Dinesh. Right? You can sit in your ivory tower and lecture me because being Israel first is so financially beneficial to your income. If the money wasn't flowing in and somebody cut off that money spigot, how quick do you think this guy would change? These guys don't live the same life that we live. They are not America first. They are rich, elite assholes who get to stroke Trump's ego. And the closer you are to that ego, the closer you are to that money printer. And these dudes are making money hand over fist, shilling for Israel, shilling for a foreign nation. These are the types of assholes that need to register as foreign gosh damn agents. They're taking our tax dollars. They're benefiting from being close the president. His administration has sold us out to Israel. They're getting felt filthy rich while we're fucking struggling, while our streets are falling apart, while our schools are getting destroyed, while our children are having a hard time, or our parents are having a hard time keeping the roof over a kid's head. Both parents have to work two jobs and now you can't even retire by the time you're 70 because you can't afford it because this administration's weakening the dollar at the expense of every single American citizen. So don't give me this bullshit, Dinesh. Pipe down.
Saved - October 9, 2025 at 10:55 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Dinesh D’Souza has 802,000 followers on YouTube and his interview with Netanyahu only received 11,000 views on YouTube. Talk about destroying your legacy. https://t.co/0ara7Ajdng

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 labels Dinesh D'Souza "the biggest fraud Israel first grifter, not even a natural born American citizen." "He's a foreigner," and he should "go the fuck back home" as they claim "his career is falling apart and going down in flames." Using analytics, they state: "In the last thirty days, he's only got 1,000,000 views across his entire channel" and "eight hundred and two thousand subscribers." Video-by-video: "Thirty minutes ago, the video has gotten 72 views"; "Benjamin Netanyahu, Yahoo, twenty three hours ago, 1,000 views"; "Your film, the dragon prophecies"; "Bro, you are a washed up failure." They argue he is "an Israel's mouthpiece" and cannot "get 11,000 views on an interview with the prime minister." They reference reactions in the comments roasting him, including "Indians do weird shit like that" and "washed up faggotty ass" and "how many shekels do you think they pay this dude?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about Dinesh D'Souza, shall we? The biggest fraud Israel first grifter, not even a natural born American citizen. So let's that let's just get that straight. Nothing that this man says aligns. He wasn't born in this country. His family wasn't born in this country. His children may have been born in this country, but he is not a natural born American citizen. He's a foreigner, and he can go the fuck back home if he fucking wants to continue this bullshit. And this dude's career is falling apart and and going down in flames unlike anything we've ever seen. I need you to check out this video, and then I'm gonna prove to you what a fraud and failure this dude really is. Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, you take a guy like Tucker or Candace. I mean, we came to admire these people for other reasons. Right? Candace wasn't doing Brexit. She's taking on affirmative action and DEI, and I would speak at her events. And Tucker came to fame very much because he was talking about COVID. He was talking about the the police state and the deep state. He was showing a certain amount of guts in dealing with with Fox News. But what I'm saying is these people have now metamorphosed into really completely different people, where today, almost any issue you bring up, tariffs, they're gonna circle it right back to the Mossad. It's gonna come right back to Netanyahu. It's gonna so the obsession is, like, so strange because they never used to be this way. Speaker 2: They never used to be this way. I mean, we came to love them because of this. I mean, let me just make you think that I'm smarter than you and I'm this fucking Speaker 0: Oh, the fuck home. This is not your country. You don't get to dictate the fucking laws. You don't get to dictate how we fucking feel. If we wanna call out the fucking genocide and the bullshit and the fact that Israel has a fucking death grip on our country and we are being taxed to death, our country's fucking falling apart, and we can't afford to feed our fucking children and keep a roof over our head while you're living in a fucking ivory tower. Shut the fuck up. Okay? Let me show you this dude's what a failure this dude is and how we can prove it. Show you this. Let me let's go back to the home tab, shall we? So if we come over to the home tab, I got a software that actually pulls up his analytics. So in the last thirty days, he's only got 1,000,000 views across his entire channel. Right? And that and this dude has eight hundred and two eight hundred and two thousand subscribers. So now let's go to the video tab, shall we? And we'll go play by play. Okay. Thirty minutes ago, the video has gotten 72 views. So a good a healthy YouTube channel, the one that hasn't collapsed and completely burnt to the ground, in the first twenty four hours, right, you should be getting at least 10%. Mister Beast gets about 20%, and that's mister Beast, like the best YouTube channels. So which means if you had a million views, 20% of a million would be 200,000. So that just kinda sets the bar for an absolute channel that's on fire. One that's barely struggling is 10%. So if you have a million subscribers or if you guys 800,000, it should be 80,000 views. Every video he posts should get 80,000 views. Okay. So let's just go through this. There's one hour ago, eight hundred and thirty. That's him trying to roast Tucker. So he's got a Tucker thumbnail on there. Here's 1.1 k. This one is right here. Benjamin Netanyahu, Yahoo, twenty three hours ago, 1,000 views. You wanna go to the whole podcast? The whole podcast. The prime minister of Israel, you are so so irrelevant that your interview with the prime minister couldn't get 11,000 views. Your film, the dragon prophecies. The dragon prophecies. Bro, you are a washed up failure. So is it not just hilarious that you're getting lectured by a fucking Indian about how you should feel as an American citizen? You're a foreigner, Dinesh. You don't have a right to lecture me. If you don't like America, you don't like the way that this country is headed, then you can get the fuck out. You don't speak for me. You don't speak for 90% of Gen z. You don't speak for anybody besides the people that are Jews, period. God's chosen people are the only ones who give you any ounce of respect, and you can see that. You can see those statistics. He is literally Israel's mouthpiece right now, and the dude can't get 11,000 views on an interview with the prime minister of Israel. That is how irrelevant this dude is. He's, like, more relevant than Greta Thornburg in 2024. Right? Okay? Like, this dude is a washed up hack. You shouldn't take anything that he says seriously. Nobody gives a shit about what he has to say. The only reason he getting any views on x or going viral going viral, you're going viral because we're roasting you, dude. Go look in the comments of his videos. Wanna do it? Let's go look in some comments for you, shall we? Okay. Right. So this is his most recent one. Let's see what he has to say. Speaker 1: Trending on Netanyahu. And now I'm trending again, for some skirmishes with Tucker and with Candace. And Aw. My take on on Dude I've been actually do Speaker 0: He said he was he watches goats get fucked. When he see when he drives down the road and he sees a farmer fucking a goat, he can't help but watch it. Indians do weird shit like that. They're fucking weird. Okay? So you look at it. I said, no one cares about a weird washed up filmmaker who watches farmers rape farm animals. And then you got JT here. Let's let's see what this followers is. 48 followers. Okay. Unrelevant. He follows me though, it must be a cool dude. Alright. We'll give him a break. Okay. He says, you're spot on about Candace. This is some fucking The Giving Soul. We we know she's probably fucking Israeli. I'm surprised I didn't see a fucking Israeli flag in there. We got Stu Peters in here. Now let's go here. I'm siding with Jesus. Okay. That's a negative one. The star of Rem fan, they're pointing out that you're worshiping Satan, god's chosen people. Well, we get it. You're a Bush era neocon. You mean the boomers siding of the GOP? They're quoting scripture. Right? Raking up racking up the shekels and never signed up to ride on the Israel first bus. And, like, I mean, just look at Israel boot liquor. Candace and Tucker keep exposing what others want. So sad. You know? I mean, it just goes on and on. L a m f o. Right? L a m f o. It is like a never ending list of people roasting your washed up faggotty ass, And that's why they gotta silence people like me. That's why they gotta deplatform us and censor us and demonetize us because once we get a voice, your days are numbered. You're you're a washed up filmmaker. You're literally a propagandist for Israel. Like, how many shekels do you think they pay this dude? Because nobody's going and buying those films. He's putting a million dollars into these films, so he says, which is probably a giant money laundering grif. I would love to see the IRS and people audit scumbags like this, dude. They're just dirt. They're the human they're fucking like feces, dude. They're just the lowest parasites. They thrive by manipulating and leaching and the access that they have. Dude has a Mar a Lago membership. It's $250,000 a year. Most people can't afford to fucking fill out their gas tank with a full tank, and this dude's over here lecturing us as the broke Americans.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just destroyed Dinesh D’Souza. It looks like someone has a closet bestiality fetish! https://t.co/XMBdVR75yU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace Owens roasted Dinesh D'Souza; "We've been roasting Dinesh all week" and "So Dinesh and Susie was talking about fucking farm animals... you know what's on your laptop?" The speakers argue that an investigation is "assisted by Turning Point USA" by non-executive staff and pose the question "If the truth is capable of destroying your company, the truth, then does your company deserve to exist?" They say "the Zionist lobby hates me and Tucker Carlson" and describe it as "blitzkrieg" bombardment, noting Dinesh's tweet: "I can't comment on Candace because it's quite obviously a freak show." The speaker attacks Dinesh as "Israel's bitch" and "Netanyahu's house bitch," calling him "a little Indian rat bastard" and accusing his films of "financed by a fucking foreign intelligence agency." They end: "the first amendment allows me to say this."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know if you guys got to see it, but Candace Owens just roasted Dinesh. We've been roasting Dinesh all week. If you guys aren't following this channel, you should just hit that subscribe button now because you're gonna be in for a fucking hoot. I'm telling you guys what. So Dinesh and Susie was talking about fucking farm animals and how when he drives by and watches a farmer fucking an animal, he just can't stop watching. And Candace Owens goes, it's not we don't wanna hear we wanna hear what you think, Dinesh. You know what's on your laptop? And they're most likely blackmailing you about Speaker 1: The overwhelming majority of them. And that's what sucks when corporate, people at the top take a direction, those people get no say. This investigation is being assisted by Turning Point USA. Not the execs, but Turning Point people on the ground, people that they don't even think about, smaller employees. They deeply care about what has happened. They deeply care about finding answers regarding what happened to Charlie Kirk. And so we never want to paint a broad picture that this is turning point. So the top is most certainly not the bottom. And somebody was saying, if this, what you're doing destroys Turning Point USA? And I said, you know what? This is what I always say. If the truth is capable of destroying your company, the truth, then does your company deserve to exist? Think about that. If if I'm like if people learn the truth about how Candace Owens treats her employees, Candace Owens isn't gonna have a career. If people learn the truth about what Candace Owens does on the weekends, it will destroy her career. Like, that probably means that you're not a good person or you're not a good company if the truth is a threat to you. I've heard this argument over and over. I've never been fearful. And obviously, I'm kind of constantly going through a public X-ray, a public X-ray of my life. People examine me. I'm never fearful because I think I'm a decent person. I live honorably. Do I make mistakes? Yes, I own my mistakes immediately. And I will be very quick to apologize to people when I get things wrong. But I'm not an evil person, Nowhere near an evil person, and I always try to be honest. And so do not concern yourselves with people that feel threatened by truth. That's ridiculous. Anyway, speaking of which, obviously, you can see right now the Zionist lobby hates me and Tucker Carlson. It is like nothing anybody has ever seen in their lives. This past year, they've really upped the ante on trying to destroy me and Tucker Carlson. The hatred is deep. It's sinister. It's evil. And they have sent virtually every foot soldier that they have available to attack us repeatedly. Right? Attack us repeatedly. Make videos. People it's confusing. What is it? Is she lying? Why is she saying this? Is this the right time? It's actually getting quite boring, I think. It's a little boring. I would almost describe their strategy as blitzkrieg. I don't wanna be accused of being a Nazi for using these two German words, Blitzkrieg. But it has been something like bombardment a bombardment. And this morning, they sent out Dinesh D'Souza after me. It was very, very convincing, by the way. He sent out a tweet to convince people that they shouldn't watch me. He said, I can't comment on Candace because it's quite obviously a freak show. It's like driving on the highway and seeing a farmer having sex with a sheep. You don't want to look, but you can't look away either. The problems begin when you try to analyze it. It is what it is. And I love that Ishaar Ali replies and says, this is what I mean. These are the people who are supposed to be combating Candace Owens. Instead, they tweet stuff like this. Yeah. Hi, Dinesh. Kinda weird, man. We cannot relate. I gotta tell you, if I ever was in this awful scenario where I saw a farmer trying to have sex with the sheep, I feel very much that I could not only look away, but I could call the police. Okay? So if that's kind of what you're selling you know how, like, when you can't look away from bestiality? Dinesh, you wanna know your opinion on me, not what's on your laptop and how they maybe blackmailed you. Okay? That's not what we're interested in, Dinesh D'Souza. And he's like, well, I meant that as a joke. You didn't mean as a joke. You went it seriously, and it was weird. It got weird very quickly. And we learned more about you than we learned about me. That seems to be the circumstance. It's like a complete boomerang. But, yeah, this is they're really starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel and finding people that are in some weird stuff. So I would say, think Janesh Shouza. If he thought that that was gonna be relatable and convince people, yeah, I totally relate. Yeah. It's like, could just can't look away from that stuff when you see it. I that did not happen. That did not happen. Now Speaker 0: So I don't know if you've seen Dinesh's page this week, but he is literally Israel's bitch. I don't know where a fucking little Indian dude he's not American. Let's let's just say that out there, dude. You're not fucking American. You weren't raised with American values. You might be a citizen, but you're not fucking one of us. You're not naturally born here. So why don't you just shut the fuck up before I put you in your place? Oh, wait. We're gonna do that right now. So stay tuned. So Dinesh, this guy is literally the biggest fucking Israel show. Let me actually just show you his page really quick. Dude, you are Netanyahu's little house bitch. You go get his fetch that water. Fetch that water, boy. Go get me another water. That's what fucking Netanyahu's over here. You are his house bitch, bro. How do you look at this? Look at this soft little weak little coward of a man. This dude is worth fucking millions of dollars. He's put out, like, six or eight documentaries, and they're all seem like they're financed by a fucking foreign intelligence agency. Every single one of his films. From 2,000 mules, was fucking weak, it did absolutely nothing, and he didn't fucking hold the stones to go fucking all the way with it. Police state, don't even get me started on that bitch ass little film. We had January sixers rotting in fucking jail cells, and you're interviewing fucking politicians like, oh, how can I stroke your ego? Fucking Jim Jordan. Let's just make sure you write another strong worded letter. Jim Jordan. Dude, it's you monotone little fucking Indian rat bastard. Yeah. I can't wait to catch this in your fucking headlines, you faggot. So check this out. Netanyahu brings the point home that many people are judging Israel by standards that they do not apply to or any other country. Isn't it pretty good working definition of anti Semite? Bitch, anti Semite my fucking balls. Okay? We are so sick of this fucking this like, you're gonna like, you're like, we're fucking blind. Like, you haven't been slaughtering and genociding innocent women and children. The entire world has watched it on four k, and you're gonna fucking lecture us. Like, look at this tweet. A perfect example. She goes, I will never wonder how the holocaust occurred. We are watching it in real time what it means to be weak, corrupt, or in some case evil. Bitch, your fucking country is genociding an entire you're ethnically cleansing, and that's why Charlie Kirk was telling you guys to fucking pound sand. And Dinesh is, later, the enablers will say, wait. We never said go out and exterminate the Jews. We had no idea why our admirals or whatever support this. In fact, we suspect it was the Israel government that orchestrated it to discredit us. Shut the fuck up, dude. You guys have been slaughtering, bombing everything fucking around you. Netanyahu or not Yenya, net faggot, I should say. Dinesh D'Souza, why don't you go fucking back to Israel? Why don't you go suck fucking Netanyahu's dick? You're obviously being blackmailed like a little fucking bitch. And everything in this video is just allegedly. Nothing is fact. I'm just saying my opinion. We're still Americans. We can say our fucking opinion because the first amendment allows me to say this to you. Fuck you, Dinesh. You piece of shit, little bitch.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Did you know? While millions of American families drown in debt, on the brink of bankruptcy and losing their homes over skyrocketing bills, Israeli mothers rake in monthly checks for every baby they have? Mothers are paid by the Israeli government via direct deposit on the 20th https://t.co/hsVghYxA64

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker labels D'Souza a 'dirtbag grifter' and alleges Charlie Kirk turned down a $150,000,000 offer from Netanyahu to defend Israel against Tucker Carlson. They cite a D'Souza tweet: 'the problem with Tucker is not that he's bad for Israel. He's bad for Trump and MAGA. He's trying to rip MAGA apart ideology and generationally,' and ask who benefits—the left or the Islamic jihadist. Israel pays monthly child allowances to mothers for each child under 18 via the National Insurance Institute, deposited on the 20th. They claim Kirk's donors and APAC fund his work and criticize 'Israeli propaganda.' They allege Kirk wrote to Jewish donors 48 hours prior to taking a bullet to his throat that he would cut ties with Israel. The discussion also covers free Israeli organ transplants, Americans' costs, and Israelis' access to US care. A live Carlson–D'Souza debate is proposed for December at Turning Point USA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything stated in this video is just allegedly. There's no facts. This is just my personal opinion of who I think is a complete dirtbag grifter, and his name is Dinesh D'Souza. You know what Charlie Kirk turned down? Charlie Kirk turned down a $150,000,000 offer for Benjamin Netanyahu because Benjamin Netanyahu wanted him to defend Israel against Tucker Carlson. Let me read this tweet for you really quick. Okay. So Dinesh D'Souza says, the problem with Tucker is not that he's bad for Israel. He's bad for Trump and MAGA. He's trying to rip MAGA apart ideology and generationally. Says, I don't know his motives, but who can be blind to the effects in his actions? And who benefits? The left or is the Islamic jihadist? Now I wanna show you a few things about Israel that you most likely don't know. Check this video out. Speaker 1: Did you know that in Israel, when you have a baby, you get a check, and then that baby gets a check every month until it's 18 put into the mother's bank account? It's our tax dollars. Speaker 0: So I said, Grok, do Israel and mothers get a check from the government every month after they've had a baby? Yes. Israel mothers and families in general receive a monthly child allowance from the government through the National Insurance Institute, the whatever this is called, after having a baby. This benefit is paid automatically for each child under the age of 18 regardless of family income and typically deposited into the mother's bank account on the twentieth of each month. So let me get this right. Charlie Kirk turns down a $150,000,000 offer from Benjamin Netanyahu. If Benjamin if Charlie Kirk would attack Tucker Carlson and defend Israel against Tucker's attacks. And now who's defending Israel against Tucker's attacks? How much money do you think that this dude is getting paid from APAC in the Israel lobbies? Or do you think they're just funding his films and supporting his work? Either way, I think this dude is a dirtbag grease greaseball grifter, and I don't think you should watch his films. I don't think anybody should watch that trash because it's Israeli propaganda, and it's designed to brainwash you into thinking that it's okay that you should send your children off to war to die fighting for Israel. Did you know that forty eight hours prior to Charlie Kirk taking a bullet to his throat, he wrote a letter to all the most powerful Jewish donors and told them that he was gonna completely cut ties with Israel? Speaker 2: Unless it is true that there was a big, big, big payday that was on the line. And if Charlie radically stated that he was done with Israel, if if Charlie said he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause because of, and I quote, Jewish donors, the behavior of Jewish donors. If he said that, yes or no, well then, I don't know, maybe maybe some people didn't wanna take that risk that he was kinda what? Become Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA with all of those, so much presence across college campuses. Maybe they didn't wanna take a chance. You see, I'm just one person, so it's easy to just try to cancel my life and lie on me every second of every day. But Turning Point USA, I think got a little bit bigger than Charlie, and I'm no longer gonna allow this lie in this narrative. So answer the questions, yes or no. And I'm going to again challenge you to lie. And if you do lie, I'm gonna expose the lies and I'm gonna start dropping videos actually. So that's where I'm at. Enough of the games, enough with trying to allow Israel to wrangle a narrative that you know is not true. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. In fact, the friends of Israel were pressuring him. Speaker 0: What if I told you that American citizens who sit on the organ transplant list for year after year after year waiting for that magical organ? What if I told you that there might be a little bit more to the story and there might be a reason why you're waiting? What if I told you that Israelis got to go to the front of the bus? What if I told you that Israelis also got it for free? Yeah. That's right. Free organ transplants, free health care while you peasants and you slaves work twenty hours or work an extra twenty hours a week on top of your forty hours just to keep a roof over your kid's head and you're so stressed out that your body's literally developing cancer because you don't know how you're gonna pay your bills and get through life. Check this out. Speaker 3: Come to The US and receive our organs. Okay. This is actually insane. I don't think we'll realize how connected The US and Israel are. Not only does US give Israel billions of dollars every year that helps fund their free health care. Meanwhile Americans do not receive free health care in The US, but that was just a travel nurse who worked on an organization floor in The US. And she said that what she learned, like, through her experience working on that floor was that Israelis can come to The US for free and receive any medical procedure if the hospital in The US is better or offer something that they can't get in Israel, or if they need an organ donation, they can receive American organ donations and they can come to The US and everything's paid for. Their flights paid for, their hospital stay, their medical procedure, everything is free. Meanwhile, if an American were to get an organ donation, it could cost them $70,000 in medical bills for being in the hospital, but an Israeli will get it for free. And she also said, like, at any given time, this floor would be half Israelis at this hospital. And she thinks that Israelis might be fast tracked because she talked to one patient who had a heart and a lung transplant. And within a week of being in The US, she was getting her donation. Meanwhile, like, Americans could be on this list for years to wait for a match or wait to get a transplant. That's just this is just insane. It's crazy to me that Americans are struggling to pay for health care, but Israelis can come and get medical procedures for free. Like, how does that make any sense? When Americans are paying their taxes and the money is going towards their health care system as well as Israel's health care system, how can Israelis get free health care in Israel and The US? Like, how how does that make any sense? Speaker 0: So how about this big shot, Dinesh? You're calling out Tucker Carlson saying you wanna debate Tucker. Why don't we do this? Why don't we schedule that debate live on stage at the Turning Point USA event? The next Turning Point USA event's in December. I heard Tucker's headlining it. You know what would be great after his headline? Why don't him and Dinesh debate live in front of the entire world? And let's broadcast that everywhere. How about that, Dinesh?
Saved - October 9, 2025 at 7:23 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Anyone trying to convince you that they slowed down a video and captured bullet flying through the air is one who things. They are uneducated or they are working for an intelligence agency. https://t.co/qxol0jfLDf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker analyzes the iconic photo and argues that a bullet cannot be captured frame-by-frame at 30 frames per second; at 1,500–3,000 feet per second, a single frame would show the bullet moving about 45 feet, producing only a streak, not a frozen dot. He rejects claims of a bullet frozen in mid-air. Regarding the moment near the neck, he says there was no blood and that the second of impact could have been a necklace exploding, not an earpiece, and questions how a chain could snap and blow back over the ears. He notes camera shutter speeds of 1/164,000th or 1/120,000th of a second and argues a NYT photographer would have needed such settings to capture the moment, which he sees as improbably random. He concludes no one caught a bullet moving in Charlie Kirk’s vicinity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you guys remember what this is? This is the most famous photo in all of human history for the most part. Recent history, modern history. And let me let me zoom in a little bit here so you guys can actually see this. K? Right here, you see this line that's running across there? That is the bullet. Right? So I just wanna start off by saying this. Anybody that is trying to convince you that on a camera, on a cell phone, filming at 30 frames per second, they captured a bullet, and they were able to go frame by frame and catch a bullet. I wanna tell you, they're most likely Jewish. It's just that simple. They are so full of shit. Anybody that's trying to convince you that a camera filming at 30 frames per second was able to capture a bullet traveling at 1,500 feet per second. Okay? This is an AR 15, so this bullet's probably moving at 2,000 to 3,000 feet per second. And if you take a look at that, judging by the size of Trump's body, right, that's literally probably close to his full width of his shoulder. So you say it's about a a two foot streak. Okay? Now let me see what you're saying. You're shooting with nine millimeter, and it's traveling at probably 1,500 feet per second. If it was a handgun, if it was a palm gun okay? So when you're filming head on like we're filming right here, if a bullet's traveling this way across your screen, okay, and you were to take 30 so every photo is every every time you're filming with your camera and say people say 30 frames per second, what that means is every second, your camera is taking a photo 30 photos. And then it stitches those photos, and they're and they're so quick that it turns it into a video. You've you've seen, you know, the flip books when you're kid. You flip them and it looks like fucking Garfield's jumping over a fence or whatever the case may be. You know, the stick man's got his arm blown Whatever the case may be. You guys know what I'm saying. So if a bullet is traveling this way and you're filming this way and a bullet's traveling at literally 1,500 feet per second, in that one frame, that thirtieth of a second, that one click that your photo is taking, just one click. Okay? The bullet's gonna move 45 feet. So what you would get at best is a streak like that. Anybody that's trying to tell you that they've frozen and they captured a bullet that looks like a you know, it'd be like this. Get a little dip out here. Right? Anybody that tells you that they that they see a speck and it's this little little dot like this in the air and it's suspended there perfectly. What the fuck? Did the bullet just stop moving? And it was just, I'm gonna freeze right here in the air so that, you know, anybody. Right? And you have to look at those people like they're just subversive. They are charlatans. They're frauds. They're a joke. Anybody that's trying to convince you that he got shot from behind, I think they're high as a kite. There was no blood. Ken has seen the video behind him. Charlie got hit from the front. Okay. I mean, that's the only thing that we can all kinda come to the conclusion of. He didn't get hit from the fucking back. There was no side shot. There was no blood in his ear. There was nothing. The only thing that you may have seen that they may have caught the second of impact was the necklace exploding. Right? There was no earpiece. Okay? We're very confident on that. That was his necklace. Something detonated that blew that necklace off his off his chest. Okay? So the next thing I wanna say, we'll talk a little bit about the necklace. Okay? So, like, I'm wearing a gold necklace right now. How do you get this necklace to snap here and then blow off over over my ears, backwards over my ears. How is that possible with a gold and even a silver, most likely platinum chain? So how does this thing snap and then blow backwards over his head? You see it. It goes off in, like, fucking pieces. A lot of people say he's wearing an earpiece. I don't think so. I don't they didn't look like an earpiece. It didn't look like it was part of you know, I have my earpieces somewhere over here. I can grab these right here. So if anything, right, he's wearing an earpiece like this. Right? We can clearly see his ear. He would have had some type of tube. Right? If this was this in here, like, there's no way that the people on the and the cameras on that angle let me give you a better angle of this. There's absolutely no way that you wouldn't have seen that. You would have seen that around his ear. Something would have had to go around his ear. We've seen many camera angles. There's nothing there that indicates that Charlie Kirk had on any type of earpiece. So that was obviously his fucking necklace. That's what like, people are talking about the bullet cavitation and the cavitation, a bullet going into your neck is somehow going to snap your necklace. And Charlie had a long necklace like this. I could see if it was skin tight. If it was, like if Charlie was wearing a choker, sure. Okay. We could talk. But does anybody think Charlie was wearing a fucking choker? Hell no. So you just have to look at these people like nobody gives a fuck what they're saying. Nobody's giving them any attention because they're fucking controlled opposition. I don't know how else you guys look at it. Sorry for all the f bombs, man. They tell me that I need to cut that shit out, but, you know, I mean, I ain't intelligent enough to use them big words like you smart people. So, again, this man was taking a photo with a camera that was that uses a shutter speed. Okay. Let me show you this. Okay? K. Right. Here's my camera. I don't if you guys can see that. Yeah. I think you guys can see that. Right? So right there where it says one one hundredth of a second at one two hundredth, see how much darker it's getting as I'm getting up there to, like, the one five hundredth, one one thousandth, and my camera's getting drastically darker, and I go lighter, and I get back to about a hundred hundred and twenty five. Right? Okay. Glad you guys could see that. So that is your shutter speed. If I wasn't filming on video, if I was actually taking photos, that's how fast the shutter opens and closes. One one hundred and twenty fifth of a second, one two hundred and fifty fifth of a second. This man that took this photo, because they they published your your metadata, so you're setting save with the photos, It was, either one sixty four thousandth of a second or one one hundred and twentieth thousandth of a second. A hundred and twenty thousandth of a second is how fast that shutter speed had to open and close. That's why everybody says that this was the New York Times reporter that was magically taking this photo. He's also at 09:11. He was off the Oklahoma City bombing. He was off at the JFK, like, not JFK, but he'd been literally everywhere, and he just happens to be here, and you happen to have your camera settings set to a setting that you would never in a bazillion years ever be filming with unless you were specifically looking to track to literally capture something like that. It would be, like, the odds of him having a random camera being set up like that and able to capture, like, the first bullet before Trump even grabbed his ear, No freaking way. I'm not buying it. Nobody nobody's buying it. Nobody caught a fucking bullet moving in Charlie Kirk's vicinity on a camera. Sorry. End of story. Hopefully, you guys learned something today. God bless you. I added some value to the world today, and we out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

We have an angry short man who hates white people and an alleged closet homosexual who have been acting extremely suspicious since the assassination of Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/qdVaJiKEGD

Video Transcript AI Summary
An alleged Turning Point USA insider claims Tyler Bowman is 'a flaming homosexual' and 'in private... talks, walks, and acts like a hyper little girl,' with whispers that 'everybody was gay except for Charlie.' The speaker adds, 'Nothing stated in this video is fact. Everything is just my opinion.' The clip then covers Josh Hammer: 'Josh Hammer knew that Charlie Kirk's perspectives on Israel were changing' and that he 'hit send on sixteen hours before Charlie Kirk was assassinated' by retweeting Trump's 2013 post: 'should be public execution for all to see. You will end this bull fast.' Yashar Ali is described as explaining it as referencing 'Irina Zorutska's murder'; 'Irina was murdered on August 22' and 'the footage was released and trended on X on September 5.' A micro timeline of Hammer's Sept 9 tweets shows 'nine times on September 9' with '09:09PM' 'in favor of public execution' and notes a 2019 erased line: 'Jew hatred is inherent in the European DNA.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So before we get into this tweet from Candace Owens, I just gotta ask you. As a man, when you see that type of smile, that body, that posture, what is the first thing you you would think about this dude? Ask yourself that. So I'm not making any accusations while I'm actually gonna tell you guys what I heard from somebody. This is just allegedly. I'm not saying that it's a fact. This is just my opinion, but he looks pretty fucking closet gay, doesn't he? I'm not gonna lie. Okay? So I get a phone call from a TP USA insider today. We're gonna get into this Josh Hammond tweet who tells me that Tyler how do you say it? Boyman? Tyler Boyer is actually it's, like, known at the company or everybody thinks it anyways that he's a huge closet homosexual. And the the exact words they they were that Tyler Bowman is a flaming homosexual. In private, he talks, walks, and acts like a hyper little girl. All the employees talk about it at Turning Point USA. And I guess, like, what he said was he goes, what was really fucking weird about working at Turning Point USA was he he's like, I felt like everybody was gay except for Charlie. And he also name dropped a few other big influencers who he worked with. I can't say too much about it. Okay? One of your one of your boys allegedly is putting from the rough. Now I'm just I'm making some big claims here, but these are just my opinions, just speculative. Nothing said in this video is fact, so take it as you will. Let's get into this video from Josh Hammer, shall we? So Josh Hammer looks like an he so we got let's start with the medium. So I put this post out from this medium earlier today, and this girl put out this video on 09:11. She's talking how she's, like, remote viewing and doing this this thing where she can basically channel the dead. Okay? And she gets these feelings, and she she scribbles and notes, and she starts describing a man. And she starts out with, like, this widow peak. He's got this weird widow peak. I can't I can't make it out. And then she goes in to talk about his mustache being different color than his hair. And then she goes in to describe this sharp pointy nose. And it's an insider. It's somebody that was really close to to Charlie. And then she talks about, like, him having this this abdomen pain. And what what happens when you have abdomen pain? You ever got punched in the kidneys in the back? Where do you feel the pain at? Right here. So if somebody's stabbing you in the back, you're picking up when I'm laying down, there is some serious shit that is not right with this whole Turning Point team. And I'm not making any accusations. I'm just saying my gut is telling me that something is not sitting right with these two. I don't know what it is, but you look at mister Israel first. Right? This man's writing books on Israel. He's got Tyler he's got Charlie Kirk's direct phone number. He's in communications with him. He's blackmailing him. He's in group chats. He's lecturing him. And then Tyler Bowman Boyer, like, the what how he's acting on social media is not how somebody acts when they don't have anything to hide, period. There is enough evidence out there. There's enough, like, reasonable doubt. There's enough information that has came to light that makes everything that they've said so far suspect. The only one who's acting somewhat, I don't even wanna say normal, is Andrew Colville. He is the only one who, like, isn't just, like, just beaming out, like, red flag after red flag. These two, on the other hand, something ain't right. So let me break down this clip from Candace, and I wanna know what you guys think about this. Nothing stated in this video is fact. Everything is just my opinion. Speaker 1: People who are telling the truth. And the truth is that is now an established fact, like I said, that Josh Hammer knew that Charlie Kirk's perspectives on Israel were changing. And since that announcement, Twitter users pointed out a very strange tweet that Josh Hammer hit send on sixteen hours before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. For no apparent reason at all, he retweeted something that president Donald Trump had sent a full twelve years ago about public executions. Here it is. Here is that retweet. Trump wrote on 04/19/2013, should be public execution for all to see. You will end this bull fast. And Josh Hammer just replies and says, base. You can see. This is we are in central time, so that's about 09:05PM eastern time. Now what is the justification for this? There might be one. I tried in earnest to at first rationalize it. Right? What could have been going on that Josh Hammer decided to dig through the twenty thirteen Twitter archives and retweet someone calling for someone calling for a public execution? Well, I'll let one of the many Zionist PR agents explain it first, Yashar Ali, who, like I said, is quite literally paid to do PR for Zionists. I know this personally on the right and on the left, tried to explain it away by kind of lying, I would say. He tried to claim definitively that Josh was referring to the criminal who horrifically murdered the Ukrainian refugee, Irina Tsarutska, in North Carolina. That was obviously a big story in the September. Yashar Ali wrote this. Last night, Candace Owens, quote, tweeted notorious neo Nazi Sam Parker, who pointed out that Josh Hammer, who is Jewish and was a friend of Charlie Kirk's, elevated a Trump tweet from 2013 the day before, which called for public executions. Candace, of course, would like people to believe that Josh's quote tweet is suspicious in the context of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But Josh was just sharing what many conservatives were sharing and stating the day before, that's because they were talking about the horrific murder of Irina Zorutzka. This is where I say that no civilized nation uses the death penalty, in parentheses, referring to his own thoughts. Now another user then jumped on that and tried to establish a nonfact that the footage of Irina's murder was released on that day on the ninth, and that's why Josh tweeted that. All of this is factually untrue. Okay? Irina was murdered on August 22. Her perpetrator was arrested that same day, and the footage was released and trended on X on September 5. Josh himself sent multiple tweets regarding the homicide as everyone did because, like I said, it was trending. And when he was asked specifically about punishment, criminality, perhaps that her perpetrator should face, Josh, at no point that I could determine whether he was on the news, whether he was on his own show, or anywhere else, did he speak about the death penalty or, you know, a public execution? Instead, as you will see, and we will show you Josh in his own words, he spoke about the double standards surrounding the media coverage of her murder and really the topic of criminality more broadly and safety in America. Take a listen to what Josh said. Speaker 2: You know, Gabrielle, I'm a I'm lawyer by training. I I remember my first year of law school back in 2013 when I was taking criminal law. This is kind of the beginning of kind of the left's kind of foray into so called criminal justice reform. And even back then, there's a lot of chatter among my more liberal classmates about how, you know, incarceration and and prisons and locking people up, you know, how all of this is just racist. It's kind of like a it is an old kind of symbol of a white patriarchal, colonialist, imperialist society there and how the ultimate goal is basically to defund the prisons. And then, you know, if some people are gonna commit some violent crimes, you know, essentially, let the chips fall where they may. Well, you know, this is when the chips fall where they may, but most American people have not lost their minds. Most American people stand where where where Donald Trump stand was that they want basic basic safety. And Speaker 1: I don't disagree that we all want basic safety. I just don't hear him. And like I said, I've looked for it ever even calling for the death penalty, in those days that were leading up. So I decided to do what I always do rather than say what he definitely meant or what he didn't mean. I decided to just create a micro timeline of Josh Hammer's tweets, and it gets pretty interesting on September 9, the day before Charlie Kirk's assassination. This is what Josh Hammer tweeted. He tweeted a total of nine times on September 9, and you can gather what was going on that day from his tweets. He wakes up at 07:30 a six or rather pushes the first tweet at 07:30 a six 07:36AM, and he tweets about a viral Phillies crowd scandal. This is in Eastern, Standard Time, by the way. Right after that, he tweets a link, the one that I just showed you, to his media appearance about Irina Zerutska, where he does not call for the death penalty or anything close to the death penalty. September, he tweets against Tucker Carlson because he has to do that at least twice a day, or I don't feel like he can get on with his day. 09:29AM, he tweets in favor of Israel and throws shade at Trump and Qatar, and that all of this is related to, what went on on September 9, which is that, Israel bombed Qatar for no reason, violating, international law, which they tend to do a lot. But he, of course, was in favor of what they were doing, and so he throws shade at Trump and Trump's relationship with Qatar because, I guess, it would be okay for them to violate international law if Trump, wasn't friends with Qatar or something. 11:33AM, he tweets against Saudi Arabia because they came out and made a statement against what Israel had done. So he tweets against Saudi Arabia. And then at 03:00PM, he tweets against Tucker Carlson for telling the truth about Israel and 09:11. Again, he has to do that a couple of times a day. It's part of his ritual. Five fifty eight PM, he tweets about the Hebrew Bible being the basis of Western civilization alongside a speech that he had given, tweets a link out. Again, promoting himself 05:59PM. He tweets a a promotion of his media appearance regarding a supreme court decision. And then there's this three hour break. He puts his phone down maybe, maybe, maybe this is a three hour break where he speaks to Charlie Kirk. I don't know. But I know that he speaks to Charlie Kirk at night. And then at 09:09PM, again, we're talking eastern. Josh Hammer tweets in favor of public execution, and there's no context that is provided. So anybody telling you he for sure meant this or he for sure didn't mean this is a liar. We cannot know that. We cannot know Josh Hammer's thoughts. A couple of things that I wanna point out, Josh is not saying in that tweet that he's calling for the death penalty. People calling for the death penalty, debating the death penalty is a very common political debate. It's a very common political talking point. It is absolutely not a typical or a regular political talking, point or debate regarding public executions. We don't we don't talk about that often. It's an exceedingly specific ask. Right? Usually reserved to a visceral response to something that you have seen and in the moment. Right? Matt Walsh. Actually, we're prepping the show. I said, I will guarantee you that when that footage got dropped, which is on September 5, four days earlier, Matt Walsh would have tweeted, this person should be publicly executed. And by the way, he did. He didn't. He said, we can't keep living like this. The only solution is ruthless punishment, public execution for violent criminals, long prison sentences, hard labor. This guy had multiple previous arrests. He should have already been serving thirty years in the labor camp. This is the only way as our ancestors knew. We've tried compassion and restorative justice, and this is the result. It was inevitable. So Matt Walsh then went on his show and further explained that already contextualized tweet, and he explained how men have a visceral response. When you see somebody, being victimized, a woman being victimized in that way that arena was. So we decided for good measure that we should check to see if maybe it was something regular that Josh Hammer also spoke about, which is public executions. And I can tell you that it is not something that Josh Hammer regularly tweets about or discusses. The first time that he tweeted about a public execution, was back in 02/2013. And he said it in reference I'm sorry, in 02/2022. And he said it in reference to the Boston Marathon bombing terrorist account oh, sorry. The Uvalde shooter. The Uvalde shooter is apparently dead, but just as with the Buffalo shooter, this level of pure evil would have been another ideal time for a public execution. So to be clear, that makes sense. Right? He is in the moment, and he is saying, I'm having a visceral reaction to the idea of another school being shot out, be being having another school shooting. And for that reason, I am saying that this would have been appropriate scenario for a public execution. Motions are running high. You are visceral, and, you're learning things. You're seeing and you're learning those things in the moment. As I said, that would make sense in its context. I also want to remind you that Josh Hammer is a lawyer by training. He was, at one point, the editor at large of the Daily Wire, and he is currently the senior editor at large at Newsweek's, plus he hosts his own show. My point that I'm making here is he knows how to communicate. Okay? This is not some random guy on Twitter who doesn't know that if you haven't tweeted all day about something, you can't just throw out tweets about public executions without contextualize them. Right? He certainly understands you don't just send out a stand alone tweet at 09:00PM, and everyone's just gonna go, what are you referring to? He knows the public is not going to comprehend what he means outside of him providing some further context. And I will also add here that it is not particularly helpful that Josh Hammer as an individual is obsessively angry. He is an incredibly angry little man. You can read through his tweets. He has openly expressed bigoted and prejudiced opinions against white people. Okay? He does not view himself to be a white person. He views himself to be a separate race, Jewish. That is a fact, and it wasn't a long time ago. We don't have to go back to 2013 to hear his ideas on that. Here was a tweet from him in 2019 that he then erased regarding white people. Here's what he said. Jew hatred is inherent in the European DNA. Okay? Just like it's inherent. You're just inherent if you're white, you're inherently guilty. You're inherently an anti Semite. It's just you're you're you're born this way. It's just in your DNA. It's incredible that he said that. And in response, we were told that he meant it metaphorically, which kind of meta metaphor. Can you run that tweet again? It's just I do know a little bit about metaphors and similes, and I'm not Jew hatred is inherent in European DNA. How's that for a metaphor, guys, for you? Because I thought metaphor might be fire hair to describe somebody who's redheaded. Oh, no. It's not literally fire. It's fire. Fire red. No. I don't think a metaphor would be saying explicitly and literally that hating Jews is inherent inside of white people. I think it's amazing that he's even allowed like, there's just no consequence. It's like, well, editor at large in Newsweek, what are you gonna do? It's fine. You can hate white people. We all know that. It's fine. Totally fine.
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 4:00 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

https://t.co/Ilk0igj2Ie

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

This is the white roof of the building closest to Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/T9tXoixTgN

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 6:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The audacity of these officials is infuriating. The CIA has erased their university profiles, and I've caught the FBI red-handed for doctoring video footage. Just yesterday, police fabricated a crime scene while storming Tyler's boyfriend's house in a ridiculous display. Now, they want us to believe Tyler was a lone gunman? Absolutely not! We know a woman was seen fleeing with the shooter. This isn’t a coincidence; it’s a blatant cover-up, and the American people aren’t buying it anymore!

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Let me make this crystal clear, because the sheer audacity of these clowns is beyond infuriating. CIA spooks have brazenly erased their university profiles like cowards fleeing a sinking ship; today, we've nailed the FBI red-handed for doctoring video footage like some third-rate Hollywood hack; and just yesterday, the stench of those rumors hit, cops straight-up fabricating the crime scene while storming Tyler's boyfriend's house in a theatrical farce. And now, these same liars in suits have the gall to shove down our throats that Tyler was some isolated lone gunman perched on that roof? Give me a break! We all know damn well there was a woman bolting from the scene arm-in-arm with the shooter, coincidence? Hell no, it's a blatant cover-up, and the American people aren't swallowing this slop anymore!

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Candice is now saying that she believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination." "it's a military operation." "None of this shit is adding up, and it fucking stinks, guys." "a person going by the name Robbie Hild, who was allegedly from Washington." "No one is saying they went to school with him." "stronger than a theory and more of a hunch that this was a military operation, and people that executed this are actually from overseas." "They have a direct pipeline from Russia to America." "What we're talking about are terrorist cells." "Charlie was on a hit list. I also was on the hit list. Tucker was on the hit list." "release the gosh damn CCTV footage." "What the hell are you guys doing covering this shit up?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this story just gets even more and more and more bizarre. I'm actually at the gym right now getting it in, trying to kinda keep up with everything that's going on. So Candice is now saying that she believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination. She's looking like it's a military operation. We got people changing their names. Phil Lyman's hiding all this shit. His family's all involved. You got the governor involved, Spencer Cox. You got the CIA wiping the fuck the names of the people from their gosh damn website that were part of the university, a professor, two teachers. None of this shit is adding up, and it fucking stinks, guys. I don't know what it is. We gotta check out this video from Candice. Check us out. Speaker 1: Oh, the mysterious individual that is next to Shaner. Right? We discovered that one person was from Austria, And then we're going, who's this goth kid that Phil has been clear? He does not know him. Phil Lemmy does not know his individual. He could not help identify him. I told you it was unusual that our inbox wasn't instantly flooded with people telling us exactly who it was. Well, then we did get another hit on him, and a handful of you similarly found the same person that we did. A person going by the name Robbie Hild, who was allegedly from Washington. Now let me tell you why I don't think this is his true identity. Okay? Because if this was just some kid who grew up in Washington and went to school in Utah, my inbox would be flooded with that name. It's not. K? It's simply not. Oddly, no one has come forward to claim that they know Robbie Hill. They're all just saying, got a hit. I got a hit. This might be him. No one is saying they went to school with him. This is a a young college student. He's allegedly, like I said, from Washington State. And no one personally can say, I know this person. How could that be? How could that be? I'm gonna tell you something. Because I'm starting to get a hunch about things, and I we're gonna go more deeply into this tomorrow, but many of you guys have been sending those clues about the Azov battalion, about, Ukrainian, Russian, people that were coming into Utah. There seems to be some organized movement, people that are being given new identities. Actually, one person wrote to us and told us that UVU in and of itself as a campus has an unbelievable amount of dedication. I mean, even the president's I'm I'm blanking on her name, It, like, majored in Soviet studies. Like, they have a a direct pipeline from Russia to America. It's very interesting. And, yes, it is true. It is a fact that Tyler Robinson we can't confirm that this is Mike Mitchell, but there are old photos of Tyler Robinson when he's a lot younger visiting his uncle Mikey. Okay? His uncle Mikey who is working with the Ukrainian Azov battalion. K. He's a military man. And that gets really interesting when I start to combine all of the aspects of this case. And, again, we are still in theory territory, but I feel like we are in strong I'm starting to get a stronger than a theory and more of a hunch that this was a a military operation, and people that executed this are actually from overseas. And when you look at the aspects of the UVU case and their strong ties to that region, things get really interesting. When you look at UVU campus and their strong ties to the CIA, things start to get really interesting. Right? And I I think this is a path that needs to be pursued, that these people have different identities and that they are perhaps all from overseas. And it turns out that there have been the New York Times has reported on Russian Ukrainian spies that are building new lives from themselves with new IDs, in America, in Brazil. Essentially, what we're talking about are are terrorist cells. I believe that. I believe that with the Ukrainian war, Okay? And they always hack us emotionally. Oh, oh, we need to have open borders. It allows them to get in people that are perhaps completely insane and deranged, and they are in fact raising little militants, and they're executing these programs. And let me tell you, if this is correct, if this is sort of like a a neo Bolshevik militant tribe, then we need to be concerned. And spiritually, I can tell you how I feel spiritually, that feels right to me. I've been pleading with you guys to get your kids out of these schools. I am telling you that something very dark is going on, and I'm going to continue to stress to you that you need to take your children out of school. Homeschool your children. I there is there is something dark that I am perceiving that is happening, not just in public schools, but in private schools as well. K? It's why our kids had to go. We we couldn't get basic answers about somebody that had kinda fallen into the through the cracks and was posting Polish underground symbols. Her her her parent was posting Polish underground symbols, and I realized something was wrong. Something was off. I'm showing you this just this is, like, one headline, and this is translated from Russia by Russian, by the way. So the the English here isn't perfect, but it is telling about White Lotus sect of all things, for those of that followed the Becoming Brigitte series and things that we have spoken about about this White Lotus idea. It's essentially they're training fighters and that this has been declassified and that they have these regional organizations, these all Ukrainian organizations, and that exactly what it sounds like, that they're training fighters, that it's really dangerous. And my suspicion is that this is happening right here in America. It would make sense that there is global communication if they want to take somebody out. And it is also a fact, by the way, that Charlie was on a, a hit list. I also was on the hit list. Tucker was on the hit list. And, actually, I forgot the name of the individual that worked for Alex Jones who got killed, but he was similarly on a Ukrainian hit list. It's something that I think should be explored a little bit further. And like I said, we're gonna go deeper on that topic on we'll actually do that tomorrow, and we'll bring in the aspects and show you whether or not, you know, uncle Mikey could be Mike Mitchell. Could he be the detective? But I'm just seeing these recurring themes of the military for whatever reason. I'm also seeing a recurring theme of child abuse, and a recurring theme of people who appear to have changed their name and that are operating in the shadows, and something is not right. Again, a theory that is now turning into a very strong hunch. More on that. Speaker 0: If this doesn't piss you off and and really make you just wanna scream at Kash Patel and our FBI, release the gosh damn CCTV footage. If we have another killer out there and Tyler is not it or there was an accomplice or anything of the sort, what the hell are you guys doing covering this shit up?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just dropped a bombshell and revealed that the FBI is manipulating footage. There was a woman seen running with the alleged suspect when he ditched the firearm that was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/4mTQZKb0b0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candice Owens’ podcast segment about Phil Lyman and Shaner Broderick: Phil Lyman claims Shaner Broderick acted like he didn’t know him, "No relation. No relative." There was "a woman that was running with the alleged suspect" and "There were two accomplices to this attempted assassination." Shaner Broderick "has, of course, mysteriously deleted all of his socials except for Instagram, but he's wiped his Instagram." A lead about FBI footage surfaced; a woman with the shooter is discussed; an aunt says, "I wondered if the girl had given him stuff... if there is an accomplice." TMZ had the doorbell cam footage; the FBI allegedly had it too. The host asks Phil Lyman for raw footage; he’s upset and cites two possibilities: "Either your cousin gave it to TMZ or the feds gave a portion of it to TMZ."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I don't know if you guys got a chance to see the interview that Candice Owens just put out the podcast where she's talking about Phil Lyman. Well, Phil Lyman claims that this Shaner dude, that he acted like he didn't even know him because he came into our podcast almost moments after and completely acted like he had no idea who the kid was. It was just Shaner. Like, you know, Shaner, Shaner. I don't know. No relation. No relative. He would we even questioned him about that. So it was really weird. And then now we're finding out that there was more information that there was a woman that was running with the alleged suspect. So there was two accomplices to this attempted assassination. None of this is making sense. What is the FBI hiding from? It's gotta check this video off from candidates. Speaker 1: Some other new people, and I forgot to mention the judge that is in the case that is overseeing the case against Tyler Robinson is judge Tony f Graff junior. He was recently appointed to the fourth district court in May 2025 by governor Spencer Cox. I was also informed that the coroner in this case was also brand spanking new. That name has not yet been released. I am told that person is new. Okay? And I have also learned I've been told that Charlie did indeed have an autopsy. I wanted to let you guys know that because I saw a lot of rumors that were circulating that he did not have an autopsy. That has been been confirmed. An autopsy did take place. By the way, you should know that in the state of Utah, in case you, like me, are maybe holding your breath that we're going to see that report, those reports are actually kept private. So there isn't going to be some big release outside of what maybe the immediate family members wishing for that and saying, I feel like something's wrong, and I would now like to release the autopsy report. That's the only way that we are going to be able to see it. That's at least what I've learned. Now let's jump back into what actually took place on that day because I'm starting to get a bit of a stronger hunch about things. We'll jump back in here regarding Shaner Broderick, who is, according to Phil Lyman, a a cousin who he refers to Phil as his uncle across interviews. Doesn't matter. Their family members is the main point, and they know each other. And Shaner Broderick has, of course, mysteriously deleted all of his socials except for Instagram, but he's wiped his Instagram. Okay? Just deleted his Facebook and just outright deleted his LinkedIn page because I asked him a question before we even went live. That was his response. Okay? Now he did this not before I grabbed everything that I needed from his pages. I just had a suspicion that he might not be willing to participate, and I was operating under the assumption that he might just privatize his socials. So I instructed my team to grab everything before I even made contact. Now what I did not anticipate was that he would delete the content. K? Why would why would he delete the content? That part never wasn't tracking for me. It didn't make sense to me. Now it sort of maybe does make a lot of sense to me. So you will recall that we had received a lead live on the show. Someone paid money to inform us that there was footage that the FBI was hiding. Right? She wrote in, said, I have been trying to reach out to you everywhere. The FBI is hiding footage. The doorbell cam footage had more. This is what the person told us. She said, the shooter is then seen changing his clothes, and he is with a woman, she told me. Then she gives me a name, and that name was another Lyman family member, and that's when my spidey senses started tingling. I'm like, okay. This is a lot of Lyman's now. I wanna be very clear and fair to Phil Lyman. He has been forthcoming about the fact that his family owned that property. Like, they own everything there. That is not mysterious. He's not hiding that fact. UVU, in many ways, purchased the university from his family. Right? That the the acreage from his family for that university. But I did feel that if that is the case, obviously, then Phil Lyman would, in theory, be able to access that access that footage. Right? Be able to speak to his family members. And, yeah, I didn't want to come out and say that it was a fact that the woman that there was a woman with the shooter without any proof. We had no we had no proof outside of this person, and what she was saying felt real to me definitively, but I needed something more solid. Well, we came across something more solid. We reviewed the footage that Shane or Broader. Of course, we downloaded everything, hadn't actually reviewed it, had wiped from the Internet. And, yeah, the proof is in the pudding, and I'm gonna let you hear it. Now to set this up, you will recall that Shaner and his close friends that nobody knows, apparently, they were retracing the footsteps of the killer. They were at his grandma's house, he said. And he's speaking on camera with his aunt to set this footage up for you. And sure enough, you're gonna hear right in the beginning, his aunt is going to mention that there was a woman who was helping the shooter, and she's not sure whether or not that person was an accomplice. I know I would say if you're helping you're helping the shooter, you were an accomplished accomplished, but somehow we all missed this in this actual clip that Shaner had posted and has since been wiped from the Internet. Take a listen. Speaker 2: If you time how long Speaker 3: it took him to get from that little part over to here was way longer than it should have been. Speaker 4: So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff. Speaker 5: Like, if there isn't a compost. Sorry. You're filming. Speaker 6: And it said right here, that picture from Sam's across the street, he was right here. Yep. Speaker 1: So you see, she's talking about the shooter, and she says, I was wondering if the girl had given him stuff, and then somebody off camera says, you know, you're filming. And she says, I'm sorry that you're filming, but it's very clear. There's no question at all. In fact, leading into that, which we should have maybe cut that a little bit earlier, they're speaking about how she thought the FBI had it wrong. The timing didn't make sense to her, and she that that's what she started with. I don't know, the the timing doesn't make sense to me because I thought that it took a little longer for him to walk. Let's play that again, Skyler, just so they can hear it again. She says that there's a girl. Take a listen. Speaker 2: If you time how long Speaker 3: it took him to get from that little part over to here, it was way longer than it should have been. Speaker 4: So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff. Speaker 5: Like, if there is an accomplice. Speaker 6: Sorry. You're filming. And it said right here, that picture from Sam's across the street, he was right here. Yep. Speaker 1: So just to be clear, those subtitles are wrong. It's just that that's AI. She's saying, I wondered if there is an accomplice. Okay? I wondered if there is an accomplice, which we should edit that, Chris, when we rerelease that. And then somebody says something something, and she's like, sorry. I didn't realize you were filming. Okay. So we have the woman who was my source who said that the FBI cut the footage, and she was certain of it. And now we have actually the woman who handed over her footage to the FBI saying, I wondered if that woman was an accomplice. Ladies and gentlemen, what the heck is going on? Who was the woman that was with the alleged shooter? Why wouldn't the FBI immediately release that? Now, again, you should recall that the very next morning on September 11, TMZ already had the doorbell cam footage. Okay? So that means that the FBI already had the footage. Right? They would have seen that there was a woman with the shooter, and yet they chose during this manhunt, during this thirty three hour manhunt, not to inform the public that they were also looking for a woman who this lady believes, she wondered whether or not she would have been an accomplice if that if that was his accomplice. What happened to this lady? Who is the girl, the woman that was in this footage, guys? I don't know. What are your ideas here? Why would the FBI not tell us something so evidently crucial to this story that we have a woman that's involved. Was she? What she looked like? How old is she? I obviously did the the sensible thing. Right? I reached out to Phil Lyman because it's his family, and I asked him whether or not he would be willing to track down this footage for me. And he's not happy with me. He's angry. I mean, he said really not nice things to me. He started asking me if I had something to do with the shooting. Okay. And I basically just stayed focused and said, Phil, okay, we showed your footage. I'm he's very upset about cousin versus nephew thing. It's I said it's all irrelevant. If you're saying you actually want to help us, catch the killer. Right? If that's really where your heart was, if that's really why you injected yourself so much into this story, why wouldn't you, knowing how deeply I care about this, walk over while you're in the neighborhood popping by, walk over to your aunt, grandma, cousins, I don't care whose house, and say, hey. You said there was an accomplice, that there was a woman, okay, that might have been an accomplice. Do you mind letting me see the raw footage so that I can hand it over to Candice? In fact, how about just giving me any of the footage that your family rushed to give at TMZ? Why did they rush to give it to TMZ? By the way, you that you definitely were at you said you were at your cousin's house and that you hadn't seen the footage. You were watching it live with Kaylee McEnany on Fox News. That's what you said during that segment. Right? I'm this is the first time I'm seeing this footage. So, apparently, your cousin close enough to go to their house, but your cousin decides to give the footage of TMZ before you can even see it. Okay. Maybe maybe the feds gave it. That's another assumption. That's the only two options. Either your cousin gave it to TMZ or the feds gave a portion of it to TMZ, which begs the question, why were we not told?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

During Candace Owens' podcast episodes that aired last night and today, she leveled several accusations and posed probing questions about Phil Lyman, a candidate for governor of Utah. Mr. Lyman joined our X Space last night and directly addressed many of those claims. https://t.co/QVypWNvwTf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Night’s X Space, Candace Owens released a clip about Phil Lyman showing up at her source’s house; a follow-up episode today "caught him in a couple more lies that were contradicting." Lyman joined the space and said, "My family has been in that spot for five generations and they owned all that property." He said he was invited to the house: "He invited me there" and "I stopped by... to see if you were in town." He described Truman Van Cot, who "worked on Spencer Cox's campaign in 2020," as arranging meetings; Candace did not request footage until Sunday morning. Lyman said, "I am not running for anything." The discussion identified an Austrian man, "Gurnow Omer," matched to photos on a German blog and a BearingPoint video; Shaner Broderick’s social media was wiped; "two girls, goth" near the scene; footage shows Lyman inside the building at 12:23, not outside.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you weren't in last night's x space when Phil Lyman came in, we he came in or we brought him up as a speaker right after we paid played the clip from Candace Owens. It was about a fifteen or twenty minute clip. She went into this in-depth dive about how Phil Lyman showed up at her source's house. It's a 20 year old kid's house, and it was this big thing. Now I said it was weird and that Phil was messaging me and then he got into my Twitter space. Was upset that I said the word weird, which is kinda weird. But we won't say weird anymore. We'll just leave it at that. But anyways, I thought that Candace was just gonna put out one episode and maybe just wanted to put it out there. Hey. This guy's weird. I don't know what's going on. This this didn't add up. Here's what I know, and that was gonna be it. But she did a follow-up episode today and caught him in a couple more lies that were contradicting. So I don't wanna mis represent anybody. I'm not saying that Phil is guilty or not guilty. He was man enough to join in our Twitter space last night. He said a lot of important things. Think in there, we asked him a lot of really good questions. I think it'd be worth listening to. And then I wanna show you what Candace played today. And wanna let you guys I know this is gonna be a really long one. It's gonna be a thirty minute clip. So if you guys wanna dive in and listen to this whole thing, by all means. That way you guys can have an idea. I think I was the first one to actually get to interview Phil or talk with him since this whole Candace stuff has been going on. Some things aren't adding up, but you guys can figure this one out for yourself. Don't wanna put any words in anybody's mouth. God bless you guys. Speaker 1: Ryan with that 20 year old's house, what happened there? But I don't even know. Speaker 0: Yeah. I agree. Go ahead, Phil. Speaker 2: Alright, Ryan. This is your show. I guess, you know, if you wanna spend twenty five minutes playing Candace's BS, you can do that. Yeah, Ian said he was coming out to Utah. I am four hours away. I called Truman and said, hey, have you got a minute? I'm just in the neighborhood. He said, Yeah, you want come over to my house? Which is actually his grandparents' house. He'd invited me over there several times. He wants to work on my campaign. So I stopped by and I said, Hey, I just wanted to see if you were going to be in town. I'm not going to be here. If Ian wants to meet with somebody, would you be willing to go over and show him because you live right here next to campus? I think that would work. That would be interesting. But I want to say something to start off, Ryan. I mean, get on. You use pejoratives about me. It's weird. He's DMing me. He's DMing me. Well, you sent me three DMs after the last meeting. And the last one you said, we're going to do another big space on Monday. If you're digging into Cox, I'd love for you to give us a five to ten minute briefing on your findings. I said, I'd love to. And then I answered your question about, I said, Ian Carroll is in town and hopefully he'll be on as well. I didn't say, I'm trying to hook up with Ian Carroll. I didn't say any of that stuff. My family has been in that spot for five generations and they owned all that property. The Steel's owned all that property. So you can make a big conspiracy out of it. Well, they've got houses there. It's like, yeah, the whole neighborhood, the whole area was my grandpa's farm. It shouldn't surprise anybody that we still have property there. My mom owns like five lots. I don't think there's 12 homes there that they're owned by my family, but there's probably 12 lots and half of them are owned by my mother. She grew up right in the house closest to UVU. That's really ironic to me. It's in the middle of campus. UVU has tried to buy that place for for a long, long time. So when So when the parking lot is full, not just me goes and parks over there near my relative's house, half of the students that walk down that street do. There's a reason for this. Okay. I want to hit a couple of things. Yeah. So Truman, yes, I don't know how old he is. Didn't even know who he was until a couple of weeks ago. He's texting me the day of the Kirk thing. He says, hey, I'm I'm over here by the found. Let's meet up. I never did meet up with him. I text him that evening. I said, I hope you're okay. Sorry we didn't sorry we didn't connect. He comes to an event of mine on the seventeenth. Says he really wants to work on my campaign. I don't I said I don't have a campaign. I'm not running for anything. I am not a gubernatorial candidate. I ran against Spencer Cox. He gets me on a call with Candace Owens. It's not a cold call. I mean, I'm as cold called as she is. She gets her on. He has to drop off. So I'm talking to Candace and I said, look, you can take it for what it's worth. This is who I am. This is where my family's from. And I'm glad to answer any questions, whatever you've got, whatever you need. They did not ask for footage from me. They didn't ask for any of that until Sunday morning. And his name's not Nick, it's Truman. So Truman Van Cot, I don't know why an he alias. And he's a man that worked on Spencer Cox's campaign in 2020. He worked on Trent Stagg's campaign this last year. Both of them are very disgruntled with him. I didn't realize all of this about him. So all of these things weigh into this. Don't even know where to start on this. Ryan, I appreciate what Sam said. You know, the ignorance is staggering. And people that get on here and say this kind of stuff and for Candace to get on there and go on this long rant, we don't even know who his parents are. I'm a 61 year old man. You want to find my parents life, his look. If you do any Google search on Phil Lyman, you're going to find hundreds and hundreds of articles about my stand against the federal government in 2014 and 2015, and going to jail, and all of these things that I've stood up. Knock yourself out. And like I said, Ryan, this is your show. So you do what you want with But if you're if you're looking for the truth, you're not getting it from Candace Owens. I can tell you that. Speaker 0: Well, we brought you up here to speak, man. We listened to what Candace had to say, and then we just wanted to hear what you had to say. So that's kind of it, you know, and I think Dee Dee and a couple people may have some more questions for you. So I'm glad you showed up and glad to have you here, man. Go ahead, Didi. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, listen. My guess I guess I I think the reason that she was trying to keep him anonymous is let me start here. How old is this this man? And I'm gonna call him Nick because I don't wanna dox anybody or whatever. And with all due respect, you were making the waves. Right? You were on a couple of interviews. So Speaker 2: I was I was making waves. Speaker 1: Oh, you're you're you were on a couple interviews. Were you not? Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Was like Speaker 1: For for you, you decided to put your name out there. I don't know that he did. So I'm gonna continue calling him Nick. Neither here nor there. How old is he? Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know how old he is. Speaker 1: Is he a college student? Speaker 2: I don't know if he's going to college or not. I know he worked on Spencer Cox campaign in 2020. He asked if he could work on my campaign. He has never worked on my campaign. And I told him I didn't really think that I had a spot for him to work on my campaign. We went and got pizza after the event on the seventeenth. He and my Lieutenant Governor Canada went together. And we sat down and we talked about some things. And of course, everybody's very, very interested in the Charlie Kirk assassination. And it's very devastating. And we're talking about these things. And he's got information and I'm giving him information and we're talking about this. I'm sharing photos. I'm talking about, hey, this is what I saw. You heard me right there on the Candace thing saying, I don't think that was Tyler Robinson. I don't think this gun was on the roof. Those are the kind of conversations we're having. I know his grandparents, who he lives with, because they're just around the corner from my grandparents where I spent so much time. All of this is just really astonishing. But yeah, if Candace says he's 20, that's probably how old he is. He's 20 years old. I'm not going over to his house. I'm saying, hey, have you got a minute? He said, yeah. And said, well, I'm just in the neighborhood. He said, well, just come over to my house. Here it is. He'd already given me the address. I knew exactly where he lived. So he texted me the address. It's like, I'm basically out in front heading down the street. I'll just I'll just spin around and come over, which I did. Speaker 0: Wait. So he invited you there? You didn't just randomly show up? Speaker 2: Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. He invited me there. Speaker 1: What do you think Speaker 2: I said Speaker 1: If you know what I'm asking, what do you think he Speaker 2: grab a bite. Yeah. Speaker 1: What do you what do you think he thought? So he had clearly made the assumption that it was a weird interaction. Was there anything that was troubling you that day? Speaker 2: He's telling that after the fact. It was not a weird interaction. I went in. I said, look. I got a Zoom call. I gotta be on in, twenty minutes. He said, well, you can do it in here and I said, I'll just do it in the car. I'm around the corner from from my family's property. I got in the car. There was two ambulance that that drove by while we were talking and I looked at it. Was like, man, what's going on? And then and then if I get out and the fire engine comes right down 800 West there and which is which is my family's thing. So, I drive down and sure enough, there's two ambulances and a fire engine parked in front of my aunt's house, the same place I was parked. It's like, well, that's kind of weird. So, so, I mean, he can say that I'm I'm looking out the window and it's weird. I don't know how many times in this program, I've heard weird connected to myself. That's a pejorative term. It's designed to make somebody look like they're a crazy person. And I am not going down that path. If a 20 year old who wants to work on my campaign says, oh, hey, can you just stop by my house, my grandparents house? I'll be there in a minute. And it's like, oh, yeah, I can stop by. What I wanted to do is find out, you going to be in town because Ian Carroll's coming? And I told him this. Sorry, Ian. I told him, I said, this is confidential information. I know Ian doesn't want this out, so I'm not pushing. Just keep it between you and I. Well, obviously, it's not between he and I anymore. It's it's everywhere. And and I I don't have any I don't have any plans to meet up with Ian. I was hoping that he would be able to see me on Saturday night when he got there late. He wasn't. But, yeah, if you wanna know anything about about Speaker 1: don't I don't see any hands. Speaker 2: True in Bangkadot. Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, I'm I'm gonna stick with calling if he is a 20 year old kid. I think it's not really fair. Speaker 2: But What what what what tell me what that means when you see a 20 year old kid. Speaker 1: I mean, with all due respect, you have gone on shows to interview. Correct? Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: Has he? Speaker 2: I don't know. Speaker 1: Well, he hasn't. Obviously, we don't Speaker 3: know his name. So, you know, when I say that, that's why I'm Speaker 1: gonna keep his anonymity. Speaker 4: So she's just being respectful, man. And and that's the thing about it because maybe he wanted to be anonymous. And don't stress on the the weird thing. Everything's weird at this point with this whole little thing going on. So I just wanted to kinda kinda ease that up there right there. I would like to know something, though, if that's okay, DD. Speaker 2: Okay. So then so then Candice gets on and says, oh, this house is owned by Lyman Branch. What's his relation to Phil Lyman? It's like me saying, well, what's Candice's relationship to this other Candice person? It's like the whole thing is just it's insulting. And I guess it's insulting because I'm looking at a group of people who seem to be gobbling it up as if it's as if it's weird and if it's some conspiracy thing. Let me Speaker 1: ask you this. Have you ever Speaker 0: talked to have you ever talked to Tyler Robinson, his family, or has any of your relatives ever talked to Tyler Robinson? Is it family before this event? Speaker 2: No. I don't I I I don't know. I don't know his family at all. Speaker 1: But doesn't Speaker 0: I thought you mentioned something about his grandparents. Speaker 2: No. I said, I said, Truman's. Truman's grandparents. Speaker 0: Ah, gotcha. Speaker 2: Truman Van Kot's grandparents live around the corner from my grandparents. Speaker 0: And why did your nephew or relative take down his social media page after Candace asked that question? Speaker 2: I have no idea. I mean, I know who Shaner is. We've we've, you know, connected a couple of times over the years, but Shaner's Shaner's Shaner. I don't know. I didn't know he took it down. I didn't know he put it up. I don't know what he's doing. I'm not connected to that. Speaker 0: Okay. And and he and your and your grandson was the one who got the Converse photo. How did did he tell you that story? Can you tell us a little bit about how managed to magically find the magic sneaker print? Speaker 2: Well, did you say my grandson? Speaker 0: No. Don't know who that was it your nephew or I'm not sure who the relative relative that she said that was somebody in the photos with your relative or something? Speaker 2: I think she's talking about Shaner. And I think he said, yeah, we went out and tracked the exact I mean, I'm going off of what she said. And her program today. Yeah. So Shaner puts up says, you know, basically right outside my grandmother's home. This guy was, looking. And we went through and we found the footage and we found his Converse print outside my grandmother's home, his grandmother's home. So that's Shaner's stuff and Candace can get a hold of him. This is the other thing, you know, Candace texted me after after that call that Truman had set up, you know, hey, can we can we talk? Can you have a do you have a moment? I said, yeah, I'd love to talk. Call me anytime. Nothing. Nothing back. So it's not like I'm it's not like I'm ghosting her. That is not that is the opposite. Speaker 0: ID, I'll go to you and then to Coyote, and then we'll kind of wrap up this segment and then go on to the next speaker. Speaker 1: Yeah. I guess I guess that was my question is initially, it sounded like Candice was alluding that you were willing to participate in any of the background searches or or finding out because I think that that's I mean, you know what? Let's ask. Is it fair to say that in the initial conversation with Candace that you said that, hey. I'd be happy to help, willing to look into anything, whatever you need? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: Did that change? Speaker 2: No. No. That has not changed. Speaker 1: So she hasn't reached out to you and you've left her unread? Speaker 2: No, she has not reached out to me and I've left her unread. That is a lie. So that has not happened. If anything, reached out to her. I mean, well, said a few more questions for you when you get a moment. Be glad to talk. Give me a call. Is now good. Nothing. So no, I'm not leaving her unraveled. Speaker 1: So she said that to you or you said that to her? Speaker 2: She said, hi, Phil. Candace Owens here. A few more questions for you when you get a moment. And I said, would you like me to call now? And nothing. Nothing back on that. Glad to talk. Speaker 1: Was that via X or was that via text? Speaker 2: That's via text. And then Truman, again, Sunday morning says, hey, can you send me all of your footage? I was like, Well, I've got a bunch of it. What do you want? Do you want me to give you the link to my Google Drive? I mean, I'm not opposed to giving it to you, but what is it that you want? I want your footage. Why are you such a pain about this? Why are you not doing this? Give it to me now. Send it now. I was like, don't give me orders. I don't know who think you're talking to or what's going on, but why are you ordering me? And he's exclamation points, exclamation points. I don't know what's going on. It feels like a setup to me and it feels like if I to make a conclusion with what I've seen from Candace today, what and I've seen from Truman today, I would say Truman is still working for the Cox campaign. Speaker 0: Think that is working with Cox to basically sabotage your potential run? Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know what's going on. All I know is I everything about myself and what I've seen. And I listened to Candace and I listened to Truman. And it's like, world are they trying to create here? It's just astonishing to me. Speaker 0: Have the CIA or the FBI or any law enforcement agencies tried to contact you? Speaker 2: I sent everything I had to the FBI early on, and and he said thanks, and that's it. No. They haven't they haven't reached out to me. Speaker 3: But something interesting happened since our episode, Shaner completely wiped his LinkedIn page. Doesn't wanna know doesn't wanna know who he's connected to. He's also completely wiped his Facebook page entirely. And regarding his Instagram, he's privatized it, but he privatized it and then removed all of the photos of his investigation into who Charlie Kirk's killer was. Now that's not that doesn't make any sense to me. I don't understand that. I can't make sense of why you would just move to delete everything when I reached out to you as opposed to speaking to me about where you were, why you shot this video, and maybe sending me that video in general. But, again, that is now a dead end. Now I asked Phil Lyman three times via text whether or not he could help us, more importantly, identify the two individuals that were in the photo with his nephew or cousin, if you will. And he was kind of pretending to be confused about what photo in particular I was referring to despite the fact that I sent it multiple times in the text chain. And then finally, he said that he had no idea who those two individuals were at all. I thought that's interesting. This is allegedly your nephew cousin. You guys are all chilling on this block around the same time. He's with these two individuals. You've never heard of them. You've never seen them. Nothing. Because I gotta identify that guy in the blue hat. Many of you figured out, by the way, and and wrote to the tips box exactly what we were interested about in that person with the blue hat. You noticed the same thing that we noticed. He kind of resembles, certainly more so than Tyler Robinson does, the blurred image of the individual that was coming up the stairs. I I couldn't look away from that. I was going through the photos, and I was going, I would just like to click quickly identify that individual and check him off and just know where he was because, yeah, I it looks to be about the same height. It's weird. Oddly, this is when I say oddly, mean, this has never happened in the history of all of our investigations. No one emailed us to say that they knew either of those two individuals, neither the blonde that's with Shaner or the person that is wearing the blue hat that is with Shaner. I said, that's weird. Nobody in the whole wide Candace Owens universe of investigation? It was making me believe maybe those two individuals are, like, I don't know, from overseas. Like, maybe they're not even American. And it turns out, yeah, we were able to identify one of those individuals in the photo, and he is Austrian. It's no wonder nobody recognized him. I mean, what? Austrian? What's this Austrian guy doing? How did we get here? Anyways, his name is Gurnow Omer, and we were able to find that his face matched with photos from a blog post that was written in German that was basically entitled anniversary hike, ten years on foot to the sea. The blog is about a group of 30 year olds who are recreating a hike that they took together when they were 20. Now I don't even know if I'm saying his name right. I guess it's a it is a it is a common name in Austria. And there are a few photos of him that were available. We were able to find his face also matched up in a YouTube video for a company called Bearing Point, where he is seen with a group of people and is introduced as one of their software development teams, a member of one of their software development teams. So let's take a listen to that clip from YouTube. Speaker 5: This is the BearingPoint office in Graz. This is where BearingPoint's key technology competencies are concentrated. This is one of our software development teams. Some people are managers and some are not. It doesn't matter. It's all one team. Speaker 3: Very recently, he moved to Utah according to his LinkedIn, which I hope doesn't get white. I'd love to get in touch with him. In May 2024, he moved to Utah to become a software engineer for JPMorgan and Chase. And I guess the story goes that he became best friends with Shaner Broderick. I don't know. We'll find out. Now what about the other guy? Right? So yesterday, we were kind of poking fun at the narrative that Phil Lyman seemed to be trying to spin suggesting that, quote, unquote, gothic girls might have been suspicious, that they maybe could have been responsible or aware at least that the shooting was going to occur. That was a part of his story. He saw these Gothic girls, and they did they seem un unfazed in all of the chaos. You know? And I thought that was an interesting way to describe someone as Gothic. Gratefully, Phil Lyman did send us footage of him after the shots rang out. And I am saying shots, plural, for a reason, because we will show you that video. But first, I wanna recap what specifically Phil said publicly about where he was when the shots rang out because I vaguely remembered him painting a picture that he was outside. That certainly seems to be what he told both Alex Jones and, News Nation that he was outside when the shot rang out. Let's take a listen to what he said on Alex Jones. Speaker 2: Just yesterday, someone comes in and says, yeah. We we've got video. He came off the roof. He walked up he came up here to the, parking lot, got in the car with with an individual, and they and they drove away. Well, that's not the story that came. It's that he that he escaped another round. There's there's there are people who are coordinating this thing. I I do not believe that that 30 aught six that they showed recovered in the bushes was ever on the roof. I think it was in the bushes to start with. And now I'm not saying that that Tyler Robinson wasn't on the roof. I'm not saying he didn't pull a trigger. I know it was I was in very, very close proximity. So another interesting thing, like you say, I'd I'd left the front of the stage. I wanted to meet some of my friends and bring him down front. So it was clear at the east end, and I heard this loud boom. I heard this loud bang. And I turned around. I'm looking like, what was that? What was that? And and, pretty soon, some people started, you know, running. Everyone was trying to process, and I thought this is a gunshot, and there's gonna be more of them. I thought it could turn into a mass shooting. So I go to the people closest to me. Everyone's ducking down behind the the concrete retaining walls, and some of them were still kind of oblivious, but there were two people that were standing there. Two girls, very goth, very black. You know? And then I just walked I I stepped up to the side of them. I said, did that not happen right here? Did did you hear that? Was that right here? They said, yeah. Was just right over there. So they're confirming, yeah, the shooter or or wherever that sound came from is right here. The thing that didn't really dawn on me is that they were not running. They were not frightened. In fact, as I stepped up, I heard one of the girls, and they were talking to each other, and they're looking at these kids, looking at the scene down below of all these people fleeing for their lives. And she says, go eff yourselves. And and and, like I said, I was not processing that. I was trying to figure out what was going on. I thought this is a separate conversation. I don't know what it is. In hindsight, as I've watched that over and over, it's like, these these people were not afraid. Speaker 3: Okay. And on News Nation, I want you to listen carefully because he at first says that he was about to walk into the building and the shot rang out, but then he says he ran out of the building after the shot rang out. So let's take a listen to that. Speaker 2: I walked up top. I had to go meet some people. So I said so I was down there. When we started we started talking, I thought I'm gonna go up top and meet some of the people. So I got clear up on top, and I was just coming around the corner walking into one of the buildings, and I heard a loud bang that I thought was right behind me. And I turned around, looked at the the girl that was there and she was kind of looking stunned at like what was that? And I'm looking at her and then see a little bit of commotion. I realized right then it's a gunshot. So so I ran out. The people running in the building, I ran out to see who it was. I'm, you know, I'm thinking this is there's a lot of kids out here and Mhmm. And I and then pretty you know, a few minutes later, then the police were running saying, did anybody see? Did anybody see? I think it was on the roof above me. I really is is the only thing I I could figure because it's like he has to it it had to have been very, very close to where I'm standing. And in hindsight, I I think it was probably above me on the roof. Speaker 3: Okay. So a couple of those statements are what I would describe as little lies. Well, they're just not true Because at 12:23, according to his metadata, because he sent it to me, Phil Lyman was inside of the building, and he must have then immediately, according to our timeline, hit record, and he didn't run. He calmly walked out of Sorensen Building, if I hope I'm saying that right, the Sorensen Building. And he wasn't the only one that was walking calmly, and I'm not by the way, none of these people are suspicious to me, walking calmly because they're inside the building, not really sure what they heard, perhaps, and they're all kind of walking calmly out. And I'm going to show you that footage. And to be clear, you're going to see two girls that are simply wearing black. By no stretch of an imagination, would I refer to these girls as gothic? Actually, I think one of them is actually a guy, but they're wearing black. That dark makeup, there's just black. He asks them what I can hear audibly is he asks them what was that. So I I don't know how certain he was. It it could have been a shooting, but we're I'm gonna let you watch it first, and then we're gonna try to clean up the audio. Now if you're listening to this on a podcast and you're not be able to watch this, you might wanna turn this down because it is visual. Take Speaker 2: a look. You Speaker 3: can just sort of see everyone on up top. A couple of people were actually out there or ducking. He was on the inside. Like I said, this was at 12:23, so he was inside, walked out, and then he's gonna start a conversation with two people that are just wearing black. And It was like a radio. Speaker 2: Yeah. Oh, my two shots. Speaker 3: Oh, my god. And then you see he continues. If he dug his arm for, like, minutes, three he just he just sort of walks down, and he engages in a conversation with those two girls, and they answer him. Doesn't there's nothing here that seems to me to be controversial. When he hears them say something about f u, it's before he has a conversation with him. It does happen. Take a listen. Trying to isolate this audio for you guys. Those those are two girls talk talking about. Actually, think one's a guy. So says, he did you see where that came from? It seems like a normal conversation. Kind of weird for me, and there's a reason why I'm saying that, to hone in on these two individuals and to say, like, gothic, and to pretend that they were doing something that looked abnormal given the fact that in the longer video, everyone up top is quite calm. Because I don't think they're really entirely sure what is happening. And some of them are ducking because maybe they saw it because they were outside. So I wanted to get to the bottom, as I said earlier, of who that second person was in the photo with his nephew, cousin, whatever you wanna call him. And we got just one hit. It was honestly, it was from Belfast, North Ireland, no less. Somebody sent us an email. And he said, look, I conducted an interview, an Internet wide search of the person's face, and I only got one hit using technology. And the hit was in Provo, Utah. And he wrote to me that it was quite a coincidence because not only is the person in Provo for this one hit for this face, but also he's featured on a website pertaining to bees. And he's like, didn't you just do a thing saying that you had this weird thing about bees and you thought that, you know, there was something else going on? And my goodness, you guys, I almost jumped when I learned that that website he was referring to, Buzzard and is a Gothic underground in Provo. Okay? So this is this is the website. It's a Gothic underground of all things in Provo, the website Buzzard and Bees, and they're speaking about a gothic prom. That is where that person's face comes up, except he's wearing makeup to make him, well, look a little a little more gothic. Take a look at this. I'm gonna show you the side by side of this individual, and I am certain, can't say a 100%, okay, because we need to find this person's name, but this is a match. Okay? The ears, the chin, just everything about this individual is a match. But he is as of yet identified as a goth unidentified, pardon, as a gothic person, and he is also as of yet unidentified as the close friend of Shaner Broderick who cannot be found anywhere else or people are not familiar with this person. So I'm thinking maybe he also came from overseas.
Saved - October 3, 2025 at 6:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found a never-before-seen video from September 10th, 2025, showing Tyler Robinson pulling into a parking lot for about 2 minutes, just 20 minutes after he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk. This spot is 1.6 miles from Utah Valley University Campus. I need help getting this footage to Candace Owens.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

In this never-before-seen video that was filmed on September 10th, 2025, at 12:44 pm. Tyler Robinson was seen pulling into a parking lot, where he parked for approximately 2 minutes before pulling out. This was 20 minutes after he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk. The location of this business is 1.6 miles from Utah Valley University Campus. Please help me get this footage to Candace Ownes.

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 5:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have exclusive CCTV footage of Tyler Robinson entering a parking lot near Utah Valley University at 12:44 PM on September 10th, just twenty minutes after he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. I need help getting this to Candace Owens.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

I have obtained exclusive, previously unreleased CCTV footage showing Tyler Robinson entering a parking lot at a business located just five minutes from the Utah Valley University campus. The footage, recorded at 12:44 PM on September 10th, places Robinson at the scene twenty minutes after he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. Please help me get this to Candace Owen’s.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An uploader claims CCTV shows Tyler Robinson at a location different from the university twenty minutes after the shooting. The video, tied to “from convict to conservative” (536 followers), is billed as potentially the most viral in the Tyler Robinson investigation and as something that will blow the FBI's narrative out of the water. Les Effer Lounge, aka Pia, says she has footage of Tyler; the FBI asked for CCTV of Tyler or his vehicle and she provided it. The footage timeline: 12:44 shows Tyler's car in a parking lot; it sits for about two minutes (12:44–12:46) and then leaves; it returns around 12:47. The FBI reportedly said, “That's all we needed. We got copies of it.” The host mentions text messages with “convict to conservative” and says the conversation will be posted in the comments. Viewers are urged to follow the source, credit him, and share with Candace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you that I was about to blow this Tyler Robinson investigation wide open? Because we now have CCTV footage of Tyler Robinson at a different location than the university twenty minutes after the shooting. This is the first time you guys have ever heard this story, and it's all thanks to from convict to conservative. This man only has 536 followers. So we're gonna leave his link down below, and we're gonna wanna make sure we get this. We're gonna get him over to 5 to 10,000 with this video because it's probably gonna be the most viral video of this entire Tyler Robinson investigation. It's going to blow the FBI's narrative out of the water. Ready for this? Let's go. We got a lot to unpack in this video, and I just wanted you guys to stick with me. But it all started by Les Effer Lounge. She goes by Pia. She sends me a DM, she says, hey, Ryan. I got this guy that has footage of Tyler Robinson. They were trying to get through the Candace Tipp hotline, but they can't get through. So he wants to share it with you. And he just got footage of Tyler Robinson twenty minutes after the shooting on camera. So I started working with my man convicted conservative, and he started breaking this down for me. So the video you're looking at right here is at 12:44. Okay? That's twenty minutes after the shooting. You're gonna be able to see Tyler's car in this parking lot. But how do we know that that's Tyler's car? Because the FBI showed up to her work right after the shooting, guess, or right after they heard it was Tyler. The the FBI found that Tyler's Robinson's cell phone pinged at this location. So the FBI said, hey. We wanna know. Do you guys got any CCTV footage of Tyler in this parking lot or his vehicle in this parking lot or did he come into this business? Let me let's see your seat let's see your TV cams. It was right around this time. So she pulls up the security cams and she goes, yeah. And she asked the FBI, do you guys want me to do anything with this? They're like, nope. That's all we needed. We got copies of it. Thanks. And the FBI leaves, which is bizarre and it makes you think that this wasn't staged. And I'm gonna I'm gonna actually gonna post the conversation that I had with the, flyover conservative or sorry, from convict to conservative down below this video. So it'll be in the comments. It'll be the first comment to follow and check out that conversation. I screen recorded it when he called me and we went over all of this. So it's pretty crazy, but I wanna unpack this video. So let's get into this this footage right here. Okay. So the first video I wanna show you guys right here is time stamped at 12:44. Right? And we're gonna watch back here in the parking lot. We're actually gonna see Tyler Robinson's car drive by. It's gonna happen at about the twenty second mark, but I just wanna kinda skip through here just so it doesn't take so long. This video doesn't take forever. So we're at the twenty minute mark right there. Right? And you see this vehicle right here driving through the parking lot and it stops. It stops right there and it's gonna sit there. Now it's gonna sit there for about two minutes. And again this is at 12:44. Okay so the car is still parked there. We're gonna zoom through, you can see people moving right about, now it's gonna start to take off any second. Oh there it goes. Okay So there is vehicle. It's starting to take off and that is at 12:46. So we sat there for about what is that? It came in at about twenty. He sat there for about two minutes, give or take. About a minute and fifty five seconds. Car sits parked right here. Okay? Okay. Now here's the next video. Customers are coming going. This video is at 12:47. Now the next thing we're gonna watch is we're gonna watch the car. It's gonna cook right back through here as it drives to the parking lot. And there it goes. Holy shit. Okay. I mean, this is a big gosh damn story, guys. I mean, is the biggest one to ever break. I mean, this kinda starts to shed so much throw so much shade on the FBI's narrative. What was Tyler Robinson just doing? Just posted up, hanging out in a parking lot twenty minutes after he allegedly blew Charlie Kirk's head off? Do think he's just gonna go sit in a parking lot and be like, I'm just gonna hang out here in this parking lot. I'm just gonna chill, you know, blah blah blah blah. I don't think so. It was just magically when he was texting his gay boyfriend. He's like, hey, lover. I'm going get in my vehicle after I just assassinated Charlie Kirk. And I think, you know, I'm really worried about, you know, getting caught because Kesh Patel is the best FBI director in the history of the FBI. So I think they're gonna catch me, lover, but please don't share this f this message with the FBI. Okay? This man right here, convict. From convict to conservative, 536 followers. If he's not he's not at five k tomorrow, folks, I'm gonna be disappointed because I'm telling I'm bringing everybody up with me. We're all going up on this one. Okay? Let's get into these text messages. So this is the text message between convict, conservative, and the actual source. So she said the FBI, when the cell phone was turned on, it sent a signal, and he said it was here. And that's how the FBI came to the store asking for the security cams. I said, here is back parking lot, and he entered from the front parking lot. I sent it to multiple people, but everyone has their messages blocked and did not respond. And I'm not gonna go through all these. I just wanted to show you guys this one specifically where she says, I really most want mostly want people to see it and to connect the timeline, not really looking for money. I'm returning to work, once I get off work, I'll send the rest. I sent the video to TMC, but there's but they're not interested. So I don't know what all of this means. All I know is that everybody should, number one, come over here and give this man a follow. And then just try to ask yourself, if you were Tyler Robinson and you just assassinated somebody, would you just be chilling? Would you just be hanging out just, you know, kicking it after the after the fact? I don't think so. I know I wouldn't be. But what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna put all of this footage down below. I'm gonna put all these videos here. You guys can do what you want with them. Use them how you will. Make sure you guys give this man here credit. Thank you guys very much. God bless you guys. Buckle up. Make sure this gets to Candace. So go ahead and tag Candace down in the comments. We out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Let me make this crystal clear, because the sheer audacity of these clowns is beyond infuriating. CIA spooks have brazenly erased their university profiles like cowards fleeing a sinking ship; today, we've nailed the FBI red-handed for doctoring video footage like some third-rate Hollywood hack; and just yesterday, the stench of those rumors hit, cops straight-up fabricating the crime scene while storming Tyler's boyfriend's house in a theatrical farce. And now, these same liars in suits have the gall to shove down our throats that Tyler was some isolated lone gunman perched on that roof? Give me a break! We all know damn well there was a woman bolting from the scene arm-in-arm with the shooter, coincidence? Hell no, it's a blatant cover-up, and the American people aren't swallowing this slop anymore!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes the Utah case as increasingly bizarre. Candice "believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination. She's looking like it's a military operation." They allege "people changing their names" and that "Phil Lyman's hiding all this shit. His family's all involved. You got the governor involved, Spencer Cox. You got the CIA wiping the fuck the names of the people from their gosh damn website that were part of the university, a professor, two teachers." Speaker 1 cites a mysterious individual near Shaner, "one person was from Austria," a "goth kid" Phil Lemmy cannot identify, and "Robbie Hild" from Washington; inboxes aren't flooded with confirmations. They flag "Azov battalion" ties, "new identities," and a "direct pipeline from Russia to America" via UVU and CIA links. Tyler Robinson & "uncle Mikey" linked to the Azov battalion; NYT on spies; "terrorist cells" and a "neo Bolshevik militant tribe." Tomorrow, deeper; "release the CCTV footage."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this story just gets even more and more and more bizarre. I'm actually at the gym right now getting it in, trying to kinda keep up with everything that's going on. So Candice is now saying that she believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination. She's looking like it's a military operation. We got people changing their names. Phil Lyman's hiding all this shit. His family's all involved. You got the governor involved, Spencer Cox. You got the CIA wiping the fuck the names of the people from their gosh damn website that were part of the university, a professor, two teachers. None of this shit is adding up, and it fucking stinks, guys. I don't know what it is. We gotta check out this video from Candice. Check us out. Speaker 1: Oh, the mysterious individual that is next to Shaner. Right? We discovered that one person was from Austria, And then we're going, who's this goth kid that Phil has been clear? He does not know him. Phil Lemmy does not know his individual. He could not help identify him. I told you it was unusual that our inbox wasn't instantly flooded with people telling us exactly who it was. Well, then we did get another hit on him, and a handful of you similarly found the same person that we did. A person going by the name Robbie Hild, who was allegedly from Washington. Now let me tell you why I don't think this is his true identity. Okay? Because if this was just some kid who grew up in Washington and went to school in Utah, my inbox would be flooded with that name. It's not. K? It's simply not. Oddly, no one has come forward to claim that they know Robbie Hill. They're all just saying, got a hit. I got a hit. This might be him. No one is saying they went to school with him. This is a a young college student. He's allegedly, like I said, from Washington State. And no one personally can say, I know this person. How could that be? How could that be? I'm gonna tell you something. Because I'm starting to get a hunch about things, and I we're gonna go more deeply into this tomorrow, but many of you guys have been sending those clues about the Azov battalion, about, Ukrainian, Russian, people that were coming into Utah. There seems to be some organized movement, people that are being given new identities. Actually, one person wrote to us and told us that UVU in and of itself as a campus has an unbelievable amount of dedication. I mean, even the president's I'm I'm blanking on her name, It, like, majored in Soviet studies. Like, they have a a direct pipeline from Russia to America. It's very interesting. And, yes, it is true. It is a fact that Tyler Robinson we can't confirm that this is Mike Mitchell, but there are old photos of Tyler Robinson when he's a lot younger visiting his uncle Mikey. Okay? His uncle Mikey who is working with the Ukrainian Azov battalion. K. He's a military man. And that gets really interesting when I start to combine all of the aspects of this case. And, again, we are still in theory territory, but I feel like we are in strong I'm starting to get a stronger than a theory and more of a hunch that this was a a military operation, and people that executed this are actually from overseas. And when you look at the aspects of the UVU case and their strong ties to that region, things get really interesting. When you look at UVU campus and their strong ties to the CIA, things start to get really interesting. Right? And I I think this is a path that needs to be pursued, that these people have different identities and that they are perhaps all from overseas. And it turns out that there have been the New York Times has reported on Russian Ukrainian spies that are building new lives from themselves with new IDs, in America, in Brazil. Essentially, what we're talking about are are terrorist cells. I believe that. I believe that with the Ukrainian war, Okay? And they always hack us emotionally. Oh, oh, we need to have open borders. It allows them to get in people that are perhaps completely insane and deranged, and they are in fact raising little militants, and they're executing these programs. And let me tell you, if this is correct, if this is sort of like a a neo Bolshevik militant tribe, then we need to be concerned. And spiritually, I can tell you how I feel spiritually, that feels right to me. I've been pleading with you guys to get your kids out of these schools. I am telling you that something very dark is going on, and I'm going to continue to stress to you that you need to take your children out of school. Homeschool your children. I there is there is something dark that I am perceiving that is happening, not just in public schools, but in private schools as well. K? It's why our kids had to go. We we couldn't get basic answers about somebody that had kinda fallen into the through the cracks and was posting Polish underground symbols. Her her her parent was posting Polish underground symbols, and I realized something was wrong. Something was off. I'm showing you this just this is, like, one headline, and this is translated from Russia by Russian, by the way. So the the English here isn't perfect, but it is telling about White Lotus sect of all things, for those of that followed the Becoming Brigitte series and things that we have spoken about about this White Lotus idea. It's essentially they're training fighters and that this has been declassified and that they have these regional organizations, these all Ukrainian organizations, and that exactly what it sounds like, that they're training fighters, that it's really dangerous. And my suspicion is that this is happening right here in America. It would make sense that there is global communication if they want to take somebody out. And it is also a fact, by the way, that Charlie was on a, a hit list. I also was on the hit list. Tucker was on the hit list. And, actually, I forgot the name of the individual that worked for Alex Jones who got killed, but he was similarly on a Ukrainian hit list. It's something that I think should be explored a little bit further. And like I said, we're gonna go deeper on that topic on we'll actually do that tomorrow, and we'll bring in the aspects and show you whether or not, you know, uncle Mikey could be Mike Mitchell. Could he be the detective? But I'm just seeing these recurring themes of the military for whatever reason. I'm also seeing a recurring theme of child abuse, and a recurring theme of people who appear to have changed their name and that are operating in the shadows, and something is not right. Again, a theory that is now turning into a very strong hunch. More on that. Speaker 0: If this doesn't piss you off and and really make you just wanna scream at Kash Patel and our FBI, release the gosh damn CCTV footage. If we have another killer out there and Tyler is not it or there was an accomplice or anything of the sort, what the hell are you guys doing covering this shit up?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just dropped a bombshell and revealed that the FBI is manipulating footage. There was a woman seen running with the alleged suspect when he ditched the firearm that was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/ttz71I72t4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on Candice Owens' podcast about Phil Lyman and Shaner Broderick. Lyman claims that 'this Shaner Broderick acted like he didn't know him' and 'There was two accomplices to this attempted assassination.' New information: 'a woman running with the alleged suspect.' The judge is 'Judge Tony f Graff junior,' the coroner is new. 'An autopsy did take place.' Utah policy: 'these reports are actually kept private.' The video shows Shaner retracing the killer’s steps; his aunt says, 'If you time how long it took him to get from that little part over to here was way longer than it should have been.' She adds, 'So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff' and, 'Like, if there isn't a compost.' The speaker questions why the FBI did not release the woman in the footage and asks, 'Why would they rush to give it to TMZ?'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I don't know if you guys got a chance to see the interview that Candice Owens just put out the podcast where she's talking about Phil Lyman. Well, Phil Lyman claims that this Shaner dude, that he acted like he didn't even know him because he came into our podcast almost moments after and completely acted like he had no idea who the kid was. It was just Shaner. Like, you know, Shaner, Shaner. I don't know. No relation. No relative. He would we even questioned him about that. So it was really weird. And then now we're finding out that there was more information that there was a woman that was running with the alleged suspect. So there was two accomplices to this attempted assassination. None of this is making sense. What is the FBI hiding from? It's gotta check this video off from candidates. Speaker 1: Some other new people, and I forgot to mention the judge that is in the case that is overseeing the case against Tyler Robinson is judge Tony f Graff junior. He was recently appointed to the fourth district court in May 2025 by governor Spencer Cox. I was also informed that the coroner in this case was also brand spanking new. That name has not yet been released. I am told that person is new. Okay? And I have also learned I've been told that Charlie did indeed have an autopsy. I wanted to let you guys know that because I saw a lot of rumors that were circulating that he did not have an autopsy. That has been been confirmed. An autopsy did take place. By the way, you should know that in the state of Utah, in case you, like me, are maybe holding your breath that we're going to see that report, those reports are actually kept private. So there isn't going to be some big release outside of what maybe the immediate family members wishing for that and saying, I feel like something's wrong, and I would now like to release the autopsy report. That's the only way that we are going to be able to see it. That's at least what I've learned. Now let's jump back into what actually took place on that day because I'm starting to get a bit of a stronger hunch about things. We'll jump back in here regarding Shaner Broderick, who is, according to Phil Lyman, a a cousin who he refers to Phil as his uncle across interviews. Doesn't matter. Their family members is the main point, and they know each other. And Shaner Broderick has, of course, mysteriously deleted all of his socials except for Instagram, but he's wiped his Instagram. Okay? Just deleted his Facebook and just outright deleted his LinkedIn page because I asked him a question before we even went live. That was his response. Okay? Now he did this not before I grabbed everything that I needed from his pages. I just had a suspicion that he might not be willing to participate, and I was operating under the assumption that he might just privatize his socials. So I instructed my team to grab everything before I even made contact. Now what I did not anticipate was that he would delete the content. K? Why would why would he delete the content? That part never wasn't tracking for me. It didn't make sense to me. Now it sort of maybe does make a lot of sense to me. So you will recall that we had received a lead live on the show. Someone paid money to inform us that there was footage that the FBI was hiding. Right? She wrote in, said, I have been trying to reach out to you everywhere. The FBI is hiding footage. The doorbell cam footage had more. This is what the person told us. She said, the shooter is then seen changing his clothes, and he is with a woman, she told me. Then she gives me a name, and that name was another Lyman family member, and that's when my spidey senses started tingling. I'm like, okay. This is a lot of Lyman's now. I wanna be very clear and fair to Phil Lyman. He has been forthcoming about the fact that his family owned that property. Like, they own everything there. That is not mysterious. He's not hiding that fact. UVU, in many ways, purchased the university from his family. Right? That the the acreage from his family for that university. But I did feel that if that is the case, obviously, then Phil Lyman would, in theory, be able to access that access that footage. Right? Be able to speak to his family members. And, yeah, I didn't want to come out and say that it was a fact that the woman that there was a woman with the shooter without any proof. We had no we had no proof outside of this person, and what she was saying felt real to me definitively, but I needed something more solid. Well, we came across something more solid. We reviewed the footage that Shane or Broader. Of course, we downloaded everything, hadn't actually reviewed it, had wiped from the Internet. And, yeah, the proof is in the pudding, and I'm gonna let you hear it. Now to set this up, you will recall that Shaner and his close friends that nobody knows, apparently, they were retracing the footsteps of the killer. They were at his grandma's house, he said. And he's speaking on camera with his aunt to set this footage up for you. And sure enough, you're gonna hear right in the beginning, his aunt is going to mention that there was a woman who was helping the shooter, and she's not sure whether or not that person was an accomplice. I know I would say if you're helping you're helping the shooter, you were an accomplished accomplished, but somehow we all missed this in this actual clip that Shaner had posted and has since been wiped from the Internet. Take a listen. Speaker 2: If you time how long Speaker 3: it took him to get from that little part over to here was way longer than it should have been. Speaker 4: So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff. Speaker 5: Like, if there isn't a compost. Sorry. You're filming. Speaker 6: And it said right here, that picture from Sam's across the street, he was right here. Yep. Speaker 1: So you see, she's talking about the shooter, and she says, I was wondering if the girl had given him stuff, and then somebody off camera says, you know, you're filming. And she says, I'm sorry that you're filming, but it's very clear. There's no question at all. In fact, leading into that, which we should have maybe cut that a little bit earlier, they're speaking about how she thought the FBI had it wrong. The timing didn't make sense to her, and she that that's what she started with. I don't know, the the timing doesn't make sense to me because I thought that it took a little longer for him to walk. Let's play that again, Skyler, just so they can hear it again. She says that there's a girl. Take a listen. Speaker 2: If you time how long Speaker 3: it took him to get from that little part over to here, it was way way longer than it should have been. Speaker 4: So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff. Speaker 5: Like, if there is an accomplice. Speaker 6: Sorry. You're filming. And it said right here, that picture from Sam's across the street, he was right here. Yep. Speaker 1: So just to be clear, those subtitles are wrong. It's just that that's AI. She's saying, I wondered if there is an accomplice. Okay? I wondered if there is an accomplice, which we should edit that, Chris, when we rerelease that. And then somebody says something something, and she's like, sorry. I didn't realize you were filming. Okay. So we have the woman who was my source who said that the FBI cut the footage, and she was certain of it. And now we have actually the woman who handed over her footage to the FBI saying, I wondered if that woman was an accomplice. Ladies and gentlemen, what the heck is going on? Who was the woman that was with the alleged shooter? Why wouldn't the FBI immediately release that? Now, again, you should recall that the very next morning on September 11, TMZ already had the doorbell cam footage. Okay? So that means that the FBI already had the footage. Right? They would have seen that there was a woman with the shooter, and yet they chose during this manhunt, during this thirty three hour manhunt, not to inform the public that they were also looking for a woman who this lady believes, she wondered whether or not she would have been an accomplice if that if that was his accomplice. What happened to this lady? Who is the girl, the woman that was in this footage, guys? I don't know. What are your ideas here? Why would the FBI not tell us something so evidently crucial to this story that we have a woman that's involved. Was she? What she looked like? How old is she? I obviously did the the sensible thing. Right? I reached out to Phil Lyman because it's his family, and I asked him whether or not he would be willing to track down this footage for me. And he's not happy with me. He's angry. I mean, he said really not nice things to me. He started asking me if I had something to do with the shooting. Okay. And I basically just stayed focused and said, Phil, okay, we showed your footage. I'm he's very upset about cousin versus nephew thing. It's I said it's all irrelevant. If you're saying you actually want to help us, catch the killer. Right? If that's really where your heart was, if that's really why you injected yourself so much into this story, why wouldn't you, knowing how deeply I care about this, walk over while you're in the neighborhood popping by, walk over to your aunt, grandma, cousins, I don't care whose house, and say, hey. You said there was an accomplice, that there was a woman, okay, that might have been an accomplice. Do you mind letting me see the raw footage so that I can hand it over to Candice? In fact, how about just giving me any of the footage that your family rushed to give at TMZ? Why did they rush to give it to TMZ? By the way, you that you definitely were at you said you were at your cousin's house and that you hadn't seen the footage. You were watching it live with Kaylee McEnany on Fox News. That's what you said during that segment. Right? I'm this is the first time I'm seeing this footage. So, apparently, your cousin close enough to go to their house, but your cousin decides to give the footage of TMZ before you can even see it. Okay. Maybe maybe the feds gave it. That's another assumption. That's the only two options. Either your cousin gave it to TMZ or the feds gave a portion of it to TMZ, which begs the question, why were we not told?
Saved - October 3, 2025 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have a never-before-seen video from September 10th, 2025, showing Tyler Robinson pulling into a parking lot for about 2 minutes, just 20 minutes after he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk. The location is 1.6 miles from Utah Valley University Campus. I need help getting this footage to Candace Owens.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

In this never-before-seen video that was filmed on September 10th, 2025, at 12:44 pm. Tyler Robinson was seen pulling into a parking lot, where he parked for approximately 2 minutes before pulling out. This was 20 minutes after he allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk. The location of this business is 1.6 miles from Utah Valley University Campus. Please help me get this footage to Candace Ownes.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

I have obtained exclusive, previously unreleased CCTV footage showing Tyler Robinson entering a parking lot at a business located just five minutes from the Utah Valley University campus. The footage, recorded at 12:44 PM on September 10th, places Robinson at the scene twenty minutes after he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. Please help me get this to Candace Owen’s.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Claim: 'Because we now have CCTV footage of Tyler Robinson at a different location than the university twenty minutes after the shooting.' The footage comes from 'convict to conservative,' a channel with 536 followers, pushed to 5-10k. 'Les Effer Lounge' (Pia) DM’d Ryan that she has footage of Tyler twenty minutes after the shooting; the FBI pinged Tyler's cell phone at this location and asked for CCTV. She shows security cams and asks, 'do you guys want me to do anything with this?' The FBI replied, 'That's all we needed. We got copies of it.' Time stamps: 12:44; 12:46; 12:47. The footage 'shed so much shade on the FBI's narrative' and questions why Tyler would be in a parking lot after the allegedly 'blew Charlie Kirk's head off.' Text messages: 'the FBI, when the cell phone was turned on, it sent a signal, and he said it was here.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you that I was about to blow this Tyler Robinson investigation wide open? Because we now have CCTV footage of Tyler Robinson at a different location than the university twenty minutes after the shooting. This is the first time you guys have ever heard this story, and it's all thanks to from convict to conservative. This man only has 536 followers. So we're gonna leave his link down below, and we're gonna wanna make sure we get this. We're gonna get him over to 5 to 10,000 with this video because it's probably gonna be the most viral video of this entire Tyler Robinson investigation. It's going to blow the FBI's narrative out of the water. Ready for this? Let's go. We got a lot to unpack in this video, and I just wanted you guys to stick with me. But it all started by Les Effer Lounge. She goes by Pia. She sends me a DM, she says, hey, Ryan. I got this guy that has footage of Tyler Robinson. They were trying to get through the Candace Tipp hotline, but they can't get through. So he wants to share it with you. And he just got footage of Tyler Robinson twenty minutes after the shooting on camera. So I started working with my man convicted conservative, and he started breaking this down for me. So the video you're looking at right here is at 12:44. Okay? That's twenty minutes after the shooting. You're gonna be able to see Tyler's car in this parking lot. But how do we know that that's Tyler's car? Because the FBI showed up to her work right after the shooting, guess, or right after they heard it was Tyler. The the FBI found that Tyler's Robinson's cell phone pinged at this location. So the FBI said, hey. We wanna know. Do you guys got any CCTV footage of Tyler in this parking lot or his vehicle in this parking lot or did he come into this business? Let me let's see your seat let's see your TV cams. It was right around this time. So she pulls up the security cams and she goes, yeah. And she asked the FBI, do you guys want me to do anything with this? They're like, nope. That's all we needed. We got copies of it. Thanks. And the FBI leaves, which is bizarre and it makes you think that this wasn't staged. And I'm gonna I'm gonna actually gonna post the conversation that I had with the, flyover conservative or sorry, from convict to conservative down below this video. So it'll be in the comments. It'll be the first comment to follow and check out that conversation. I screen recorded it when he called me and we went over all of this. So it's pretty crazy, but I wanna unpack this video. So let's get into this this footage right here. Okay. So the first video I wanna show you guys right here is time stamped at 12:44. Right? And we're gonna watch back here in the parking lot. We're actually gonna see Tyler Robinson's car drive by. It's gonna happen at about the twenty second mark, but I just wanna kinda skip through here just so it doesn't take so long. This video doesn't take forever. So we're at the twenty minute mark right there. Right? And you see this vehicle right here driving through the parking lot and it stops. It stops right there and it's gonna sit there. Now it's gonna sit there for about two minutes. And again this is at 12:44. Okay so the car is still parked there. We're gonna zoom through, you can see people moving right about, now it's gonna start to take off any second. Oh there it goes. Okay So there is vehicle. It's starting to take off and that is at 12:46. So we sat there for about what is that? It came in at about twenty. He sat there for about two minutes, give or take. About a minute and fifty five seconds. Car sits parked right here. Okay? Okay. Now here's the next video. Customers are coming going. This video is at 12:47. Now the next thing we're gonna watch is we're gonna watch the car. It's gonna cook right back through here as it drives to the parking lot. And there it goes. Holy shit. Okay. I mean, this is a big gosh damn story, guys. I mean, is the biggest one to ever break. I mean, this kinda starts to shed so much throw so much shade on the FBI's narrative. What was Tyler Robinson just doing? Just posted up, hanging out in a parking lot twenty minutes after he allegedly blew Charlie Kirk's head off? Do think he's just gonna go sit in a parking lot and be like, I'm just gonna hang out here in this parking lot. I'm just gonna chill, you know, blah blah blah blah. I don't think so. It was just magically when he was texting his gay boyfriend. He's like, hey, lover. I'm going get in my vehicle after I just assassinated Charlie Kirk. And I think, you know, I'm really worried about, you know, getting caught because Kesh Patel is the best FBI director in the history of the FBI. So I think they're gonna catch me, lover, but please don't share this f this message with the FBI. Okay? This man right here, convict. From convict to conservative, 536 followers. If he's not he's not at five k tomorrow, folks, I'm gonna be disappointed because I'm telling I'm bringing everybody up with me. We're all going up on this one. Okay? Let's get into these text messages. So this is the text message between convict, conservative, and the actual source. So she said the FBI, when the cell phone was turned on, it sent a signal, and he said it was here. And that's how the FBI came to the store asking for the security cams. I said, here is back parking lot, and he entered from the front parking lot. I sent it to multiple people, but everyone has their messages blocked and did not respond. And I'm not gonna go through all these. I just wanted to show you guys this one specifically where she says, I really most want mostly want people to see it and to connect the timeline, not really looking for money. I'm returning to work, once I get off work, I'll send the rest. I sent the video to TMC, but there's but they're not interested. So I don't know what all of this means. All I know is that everybody should, number one, come over here and give this man a follow. And then just try to ask yourself, if you were Tyler Robinson and you just assassinated somebody, would you just be chilling? Would you just be hanging out just, you know, kicking it after the after the fact? I don't think so. I know I wouldn't be. But what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna put all of this footage down below. I'm gonna put all these videos here. You guys can do what you want with them. Use them how you will. Make sure you guys give this man here credit. Thank you guys very much. God bless you guys. Buckle up. Make sure this gets to Candace. So go ahead and tag Candace down in the comments. We out.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Let me make this crystal clear, because the sheer audacity of these clowns is beyond infuriating. CIA spooks have brazenly erased their university profiles like cowards fleeing a sinking ship; today, we've nailed the FBI red-handed for doctoring video footage like some third-rate https://t.co/rvAO3r5iQt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candice believes there are 'Ukrainian ties' and 'some intelligence agencies ... involved in this assassination,' 'it's a military operation.' Names are changing: 'Phil Lyman's hiding all this shit,' 'the CIA wiping the fuck the names of the people from their gosh damn website' tied to a university. The piece mentions a mysterious person next to Shaner, 'one person from Austria' and a 'goth kid' Phil Lemmy doesn’t know; 'Robbie Hild' from Washington is suspected to be not his true identity, with no one claiming to know him. The discussion links UVU, CIA ties, and the New York Times report on 'Russian Ukrainian spies ... with new IDs' in America and Brazil. They speculate this could be a military operation with overseas actors, and reference a 'White Lotus idea' and 'they're training fighters.' They mention 'Charlie on a hit list' and call for CCTV footage, criticizing Kash Patel and FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this story just gets even more and more and more bizarre. I'm actually at the gym right now getting it in, trying to kinda keep up with everything that's going on. So Candice is now saying that she believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination. She's looking like it's a military operation. We got people changing their names. Phil Lyman's hiding all this shit. His family's all involved. You got the governor involved, Spencer Cox. You got the CIA wiping the fuck the names of the people from their gosh damn website that were part of the university, a professor, two teachers. None of this shit is adding up, and it fucking stinks, guys. I don't know what it is. We gotta check out this video from Candice. Check us out. Speaker 1: Oh, the mysterious individual that is next to Shaner. Right? We discovered that one person was from Austria, And then we're going, who's this goth kid that Phil has been clear? He does not know him. Phil Lemmy does not know his individual. He could not help identify him. I told you it was unusual that our inbox wasn't instantly flooded with people telling us exactly who it was. Well, then we did get another hit on him, and a handful of you similarly found the same person that we did. A person going by the name Robbie Hild, who was allegedly from Washington. Now let me tell you why I don't think this is his true identity. Okay? Because if this was just some kid who grew up in Washington and went to school in Utah, my inbox would be flooded with that name. It's not. K? It's simply not. Oddly, no one has come forward to claim that they know Robbie Hill. They're all just saying, got a hit. I got a hit. This might be him. No one is saying they went to school with him. This is a a young college student. He's allegedly, like I said, from Washington State. And no one personally can say, I know this person. How could that be? How could that be? I'm gonna tell you something. Because I'm starting to get a hunch about things, and I we're gonna go more deeply into this tomorrow, but many of you guys have been sending those clues about the Azov battalion, about, Ukrainian, Russian, people that were coming into Utah. There seems to be some organized movement, people that are being given new identities. Actually, one person wrote to us and told us that UVU in and of itself as a campus has an unbelievable amount of dedication. I mean, even the president's I'm I'm blanking on her name, It, like, majored in Soviet studies. Like, they have a a direct pipeline from Russia to America. It's very interesting. And, yes, it is true. It is a fact that Tyler Robinson we can't confirm that this is Mike Mitchell, but there are old photos of Tyler Robinson when he's a lot younger visiting his uncle Mikey. Okay? His uncle Mikey who is working with the Ukrainian Azov battalion. K. He's a military man. And that gets really interesting when I start to combine all of the aspects of this case. And, again, we are still in theory territory, but I feel like we are in strong I'm starting to get a stronger than a theory and more of a hunch that this was a a military operation, and people that executed this are actually from overseas. And when you look at the aspects of the UVU case and their strong ties to that region, things get really interesting. When you look at UVU campus and their strong ties to the CIA, things start to get really interesting. Right? And I I think this is a path that needs to be pursued, that these people have different identities and that they are perhaps all from overseas. And it turns out that there have been the New York Times has reported on Russian Ukrainian spies that are building new lives from themselves with new IDs, in America, in Brazil. Essentially, what we're talking about are are terrorist cells. I believe that. I believe that with the Ukrainian war, Okay? And they always hack us emotionally. Oh, oh, we need to have open borders. It allows them to get in people that are perhaps completely insane and deranged, and they are in fact raising little militants, and they're executing these programs. And let me tell you, if this is correct, if this is sort of like a a neo Bolshevik militant tribe, then we need to be concerned. And spiritually, I can tell you how I feel spiritually, that feels right to me. I've been pleading with you guys to get your kids out of these schools. I am telling you that something very dark is going on, and I'm going to continue to stress to you that you need to take your children out of school. Homeschool your children. I there is there is something dark that I am perceiving that is happening, not just in public schools, but in private schools as well. K? It's why our kids had to go. We we couldn't get basic answers about somebody that had kinda fallen into the through the cracks and was posting Polish underground symbols. Her her her parent was posting Polish underground symbols, and I realized something was wrong. Something was off. I'm showing you this just this is, like, one headline, and this is translated from Russia by Russian, by the way. So the the English here isn't perfect, but it is telling about White Lotus sect of all things, for those of that followed the Becoming Brigitte series and things that we have spoken about about this White Lotus idea. It's essentially they're training fighters and that this has been declassified and that they have these regional organizations, these all Ukrainian organizations, and that exactly what it sounds like, that they're training fighters, that it's really dangerous. And my suspicion is that this is happening right here in America. It would make sense that there is global communication if they want to take somebody out. And it is also a fact, by the way, that Charlie was on a, a hit list. I also was on the hit list. Tucker was on the hit list. And, actually, I forgot the name of the individual that worked for Alex Jones who got killed, but he was similarly on a Ukrainian hit list. It's something that I think should be explored a little bit further. And like I said, we're gonna go deeper on that topic on we'll actually do that tomorrow, and we'll bring in the aspects and show you whether or not, you know, uncle Mikey could be Mike Mitchell. Could he be the detective? But I'm just seeing these recurring themes of the military for whatever reason. I'm also seeing a recurring theme of child abuse, and a recurring theme of people who appear to have changed their name and that are operating in the shadows, and something is not right. Again, a theory that is now turning into a very strong hunch. More on that. Speaker 0: If this doesn't piss you off and and really make you just wanna scream at Kash Patel and our FBI, release the gosh damn CCTV footage. If we have another killer out there and Tyler is not it or there was an accomplice or anything of the sort, what the hell are you guys doing covering this shit up?
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 2:13 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

New documents reveal that Israel is paying a group of social media influencer between $6,100 and $7,300 per post to publish pro Israel propaganda. https://t.co/FNPeK3GTg2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kim Iverson's video claims 'Israel government is paying a cohort of 14 to 18 social media influencers between 6,100 and 7,300 per post,' and 'Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post.' Netanyahu referred this week to 'a community pushing out preferred messaging in The US media.' The discussion adds that 'Americans are giving billions of dollars to Israel. Israel then in turn is pouring that money back into America to pay influencers to put Israel's interest above our own.' It centers on TikTok: 'Larry Ellison is the largest single donor to the IDF, and he is going to be the largest shareholder in TikTok.' 'The most important purchase that is going on right now is TikTok.' 'We don't trust China.' Israel has spent 'a $150,000,000' on public diplomacy (Hezboah). The broadcast includes lines like 'Jews control all the industries' and 'Antisemites are stacking eviction notices.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So when it comes to mainstream reporters, I think there's very few that still have an edge and actually haven't sold their soul to the devil, and Kim Iverson is one of them. She just put out this amazing video which talks about how Israel is buying our influencers and what this what is this shit that we're actually watching here. But I'm also going on Kim's show to talk about the Charlie Kirk investigation today at, in about thirty minutes. I'm not sure what time that show is gonna live. She's gonna put it out immediately, but it'll definitely be out tonight. So swing over there and give Kim a follow and check out this video. Actually, I wanna get into this tweet first, and we're gonna check out this video from Kim. So the next tweet I wanna show you is here by Nick Cleveland, and big shout out to James Lee. I love James Lee, Mandy Killen, and homie. And so Nick Cleveland puts out a new document reveals that Israel government is paying a cohort of 14 to 18 social media influencers between 6,100 and 7,300 per post. And it says Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post, and Netanyahu referred this week to a community pushing out preferred messaging in The US media. And, oh, boy, are they making a pricey sum? And then James Lee said, so Americans are giving billions of dollars to Israel. Israel then in turn is pouring that money back into America to pay influencers to put Israel's interest above our own. Awesome. Make sure you guys give James Lee that man a follow 5149 James Lee. Now check out this video from Kim Iverson and make sure you guys are coming to tonight's Twitter space. It's gonna be explosive. I'm gonna try to get as many big name journalists in there so you guys can hear all of the updates, everything, all this crazy chaos that's going on. Tonight's X Space is be off the hook, and come watch us over on Kim's show. Speaker 1: Well, mazel tok to Israel. They've been able to acquire TikTok. Larry Ellison is the largest single donor to the IDF, and he is going to be the largest shareholder in TikTok. This is a win for Israel. Netanyahu even said it for himself. Speaker 2: We have Speaker 3: to fight with the weapons, and the most important ones are on social media. The most important purchase that is going on right now is TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it can be consequential. And the other one, what's the other one that's most important? Speaker 2: X, do we have to talk to Milan? Speaker 4: He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Speaker 3: Now if we can get those two things, we get locked. Speaker 1: So there he is. Just the most important thing right now is the acquisition of TikTok. Larry Ellison will be the largest shareholder. The whole reason for forcing the sale was we don't trust China. Why would we trust anybody who donates large amounts of money to a foreign military? Israel, by the way, has been spending a $150,000,000 on what they call officially public diplomacy, or in Hebrew, it's called Hezboah. And, apparently, this is what they bought. Tell me if this has influenced you to to like Israel more. Speaker 5: You must see antisemites are stacking eviction notices. Jews are out here stacking up businesses. Speaker 6: Jews control all the industries. Maybe if you spend more time taking notes from successful people, you wouldn't have to spend Speaker 7: your nights and weekends spreading hate. Speaker 5: You're really mad because your income is giving side hustle. Period. Speaker 1: I just don't even understand this video. If it's supposed to make people like Jews or not like Jews. Just saying, well, you're just jealous of us. When we're watching watching a livestream genocide. That is what's causing the animosity is the death of children, thousands and thousands of children. This isn't going to work. And buying TikTok isn't going to work either. Telling Elon that we're not allowed to talk about Israel anymore, that's not going to work. None of this is going to work. If that's what is going to be the now new social media campaign now that Larry Ellison is buying TikTok and now that Israel's spending a $150,000,000 on Hasbara, if that results in, well, Jews are just better than you and so get over it, I don't think people are gonna be getting over it. I think it's only gonna be getting worse.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If you are a Turning Point employee or a local law enforcement officer who would like to share information with the public and remain confident. My inbox is always open. God bless the brave men and women inside TPUSA who are standing up and doing the right thing. https://t.co/cVummPBw3Q

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ian, who goes by "I Wed, w e n d t s t e r," claims Candice Owens is not lying about TP USA: "Candice Owens is not lying about TP USA. I have proof right here." He says staff up to director level are "on the same page" and that "the memos ... have only gone out to a few director type levels of people," showing "actual staff, even at the higher up levels, want answers." He adds, "Time will tell. No one knows who the higher up person is at the company that's been giving Candace." He alleges "one or two maybe people that sit on the board ... were directly financially benefiting from Israel's donations that were coming in" and "they were obviously people who were very close to Charlie." Candace may know "which board member it is." "I already made internal pushes to drop the Israel BS weeks ago." He calls for Turning Point insiders and even law enforcement to come forward, warning "you are a loose end, my friend." "My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I just wanna say whoever this source is, if this is Ian, I'm not sure if this is you or how this video came about or where these messages came from, but my DMs are always open. If this is you, please DM me, and we can talk directly. You guys don't have to worry about putting these out on blast and, you know, risking losing your If you guys wanna feed me information, I'm 100% more than happy to keep your identity hidden. So I wanna go into this text messages because this thing's gonna absolutely blow your mind. Alright. So this is big breaking news. This guy this man claims that he has evidence that proves that Candice is right. He said he's basically at risk of losing his job. It comes with a potential price. Our man Ian over here goes by at I Wed, w e n d t s t e r. He says, Candice Owens is not lying about TP USA. I have proof right here. I know having this information and sharing it comes with a potential price, but the truth matters more than anything else. Your move, TP USA. And there's some screenshots here I wanna read to you guys. It's pretty crazy. Okay. So I'm just gonna kinda skim through this. So he says, so what I know is when it comes to the actual Turning Point USA staff up to even the director level, a lot of people are on the same page. People want the truth. The typical successful investors and a business mentors to the team. For instance, if you had an investor slash adviser early on into the official Patriot gear and your company throughout there was something suspicious about them, it's hard to actually get answers because they aren't part of the day to day. So that there's that's the bad news. It's hard to get a lot of answers. The good news, however, is a lot of the TP USA staff being on the same page as the people like you and Candace and Ian, people are at the top of the company are able to give Candace some of those internal memos she's been talking about and hearing about these conversations that have been going on. These memos that she's been seeing that have only gone out to a few director type levels of people show that its actual staff, even at the higher up levels, want answers. So he's basically saying that there's some higher level people that are getting these type of memos. There's only a few people that can actually get these type of memos. And if those type of memos are actually getting making their way to Candace, well, that means that Candace has some good allies that are on the inside and that are feeding her information almost at the highest level. That's good. People want answers. Let's go to the next message. So now let's go on to this next one. He says this one and this one, he goes, time will tell. No one knows who the higher up person is at the company that's been giving Candace. It's been her source for just about everything. And he goes, I think it's best that way. More and more people are coming out, and more and more people are being open about wanting to know what the fuck is actually going on. And he says, I already made internal pushes to drop the Israel BS weeks ago. So hearing what Candace is saying is actually insane. K. So now this is where it gets really interesting. He says, honestly, bro, I can text you when I'm willing to lose my job. But from what I believe and what I think a few people have already told Candace, I think she's mentioned it in her episode yesterday, is that one or two maybe people that sit on the board, maybe two different people that sit on the board of directors were directly financially benefiting from Israel's donations that were coming in. He says they were obviously people who were very close to Charlie. And you can imagine that he's the busiest dude ever, so he couldn't be there for literally every single board meeting and every single donor meeting. He said, which is why he would trust his board of directors. I think Candace actually knows exactly which board member it is. We personally aren't sure though. He goes from doing a little financial digging, we believe that somebody on the board has a pay structure that's based on directly getting on the amount that they are directly making in donations that are coming in. And he says that's why Charlie was even starting to go against the narrative recently. He says they somehow were still able to get him in the room and try to sway him into not asking any questions when it came to Israel. That's a lot to process, guys. So, again, Ian, if this was you, man, feel free to reach out to me. I would love to have some, internal sources and insight. They have people inside Turning Point. If anybody that works at Turning Point has any information that they wanna get out that you feel is, like, just on your heart and you just can't sit by and just turn a blind eye anymore, because I think a lot of people are gonna get caught up this. Same with the local police officers. Anybody that's on the ground that is a local police officer. Do know how many law enforcement officers died that were involved with the Las Vegas shooting? How about the Anthony Weiner laptop? If you're not in on the inside, if you work at any of these law enforcement agencies, the Utah Sheriff's Department, and you're not on the inside, meaning they're not inviting you into the fold and helping you, inviting you to help cover up this investigation and maybe you've seen some stuff that you think you shouldn't have seen, you are a loose end, my friend. No joke. So take that for what it is. You guys are welcome to give me information and welcome to keep your identities hidden. But I think not putting out that information and not least having a fall proof or a life insurance plan, meaning get that information to me if you want me to sit on it. I'm a journalist at best. Right? I don't really consider myself a journalist, but I try to hold those journalistic standards where I absolutely believe that I'm an an an investigative journalist and I am held to the same oath and the same standards that everybody else is. So I've never had a source burnt. I never plan on having a source burnt. I would never leak your information. I would go to jail happily keeping your name confidential. That is for what take that for what it is. Hopefully, you guys do the right thing and get that information out there. Because I'm like I said, I'm more than happy to sit on it and not put that information out. And then in case anything happens to you and you and your family and you want that life insurance policy, if anything did happen, then we go public with that information, then your family has a major lawsuit and your family is not gonna be left with absolutely nothing. So god bless you guys. My name is Ryan Matta. We out. Peace.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Charlie Kirk told executives at TPUSA that he had no choice by to completely abandon his pro Israel stance. Then 48 hours later he was assassinated. https://t.co/5HcydUPjfD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video centers on Candace Owens and Turning Point USA, with the speaker claiming Owens 'puts the higher ups at Turning Point executives on blast' and challenges them to publicly release a statement about 'her explosive statement regarding Charlie Kirk's position on Israel.' It highlights this claim: 'About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright.' The speaker presses, 'Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself?' and notes Nick Fuentes saying, 'there was no signs Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead.' The rant attacks media figures as 'slop media' and declares 'trans slop trans shooter agenda' as 'trash,' concluding with claims that '24% of Americans' are pro Israel while '98% of our government is pro Israel,' and referencing 'Bukele Two Point O.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This just changed everything. Holy shit. Wake up America. Shit's getting crazy. Alright. Check this out. So if you aren't following May's love 14 over on x, definitely give this woman a follow. Huge fan. She's the best cohost in the game. And she's been laser focused specifically on this Candace Owens. And holy shit, did Candace just bring the heat? So you gotta check out this tweet. I just gotta let me just read this. I mean, is so freaking big. Like, check this out. She says, wow. Candace Owens puts the higher ups at Turning Point executives on blast. She challenges them to publicly release a statement about her explosive statement regarding Charlie Kirk's position on Israel. She goes, about forty eight hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish donors, and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Listen to her entire statement, guys. This is absolutely changing everything. Nick Fuentes, there's nothing there was no signs Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. What the fuck? He got the call, bro. Check out this clip. Speaker 1: You don't high hide it. You don't try to obfuscate it. You don't try to say, well, wait until wait until the memorial events before we start looking into who murdered him. You tell the truth and you tell it immediately. And I don't think they're capable of doing that, and I have an idea as to why that is. I think the same people that were pressuring Charlie are pressuring them. In fact, I know that for a fact. So they might need my help. Okay? I'm gonna state this, and I'm gonna challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Okay? Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no. Okay? Let's stop this ditching. Let's stop the dodging. Let's, like, explicitly, I wanna hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that. I want you to say no. No. It was just, you know, he was feeling a little bit of pressure. No. I want you to literally answer what I have just said. It either happened or it didn't. I'm either making it all up or it happened exactly as I'm saying. Speaker 0: Fire, but she didn't stop there, and you're gonna wanna see what else she said. But you gotta do that by going down and following Meij. The link will be down there to this video. So what does this mean? I mean, this changes fucking everything. Everybody who wanted to tiptoe, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Ruggs, the people that just wanna be, oh, no. There was no Israel ties. I mean, Israel only has an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to assassinations. Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. This is Charlie Kirk, the most pro Israel ally ever was gonna turn on them? I don't see it happening. Oh, shit, bro. The writing's on the gosh damn walls. Wake up, America. Anybody who's been promoting this trans slop trans shooter agenda, they're fucking trash. They're carrying weight for this administration. They're selling you out. They're getting paid. They're getting access. They're getting money. They're getting fucking bonuses. They're getting sponsors. They're getting featured on Rumble. They're getting it all, baby. And you wanna know what you're getting? Higher electricity bills, higher gas prices, the dollar's hyperinflating, your government's robbing you gosh damn blind, and they're bankrupting your ass. You're giving 53% of your every paycheck you make to a government that hates you. And these ass clowns over here, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Rugs, they're fucking carrying that weight, bro. I mean, they're stroking. They would lick the fucking floor at Mar A Lago to take a selfie with fucking Trump. They ain't even swamp media. We'll call it slop media because that's all they do is just serve you loads of slop. You wanna what slop is? If you were to drain the swamp and there would be that repugnant, repulsive, stank ass fucking goo that's at the bottom of the swamp, that is the slop, the trans narrative slop that they are fucking serving you because you so badly wanna stay divided. Right? Don't come together, America. Don't you dare do that. Don't you dare come together and stand united because only 24% of Americans actually are pro Israel at this point. That's it. 24%. Yet 98% of our government is pro Israel, and we're supposed to believe that voting our way out of this is gonna happen? That's what we did here. We voted for Bukele Two Point O, and we got a fucking bush light wrapped in shit.
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 1:49 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Tina Peters is the grandmother every America patriot wishes they had. Free Tina Peters. https://t.co/G1LQPQrbz4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker introduces Tina Peters, a gold star mother whose son died in Iraq. He says she went and got involved in our government and, upon seeing Davinian voting machines, declared it's my job to back up hard drive. She allegedly made a backup copy of the hard drive, giving President Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. Peters spent the year on lunch duty in Colorado prisons, wearing yellow boots. The speaker blames Trump for inaction, suggesting he could move White House to Colorado and appoint a special counsel to investigate Colorado election fraud, but it's a state charge. He claims Jewish allies staged it and accuses a foreign government of buying a US social media platform to indoctrinate Americans, cites Israel's free healthcare and education, says settlers are paid to steal land, and says Tina Peters will rot in jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, America. You think Trump's coming to save you? Let me introduce you to Tina Peters. You know what Tina Peters is? She's a gold star mother. So Tina Peters' son paid the ultimate price for this country. He sacrificed his life. He gave his life over in Iraq, and he came home in a body bag. And you wanna know what Tina did? Tina went and got involved in our government. I believe it was the secretary of state where she was in charge of the elections in Colorado. And wanna know what happened when she saw those Davinian voting machines, when she saw that shit going on? She goes, you know what? It's my job. It is my oath to the constitution to back up that hard drive. So Tina Peters went and made a backup copy of the hard drive, which gave president Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. You wanna know what they did? They put Tina in prison. Tina spent the last year. She is 80 years old. She was put on lunch duty where she was in one of the hardest prisons in the state of Colorado with a bunch of gangbangers and thugs, and this grandma is in there doing dishes. She got put on dish duty where she was wearing these big yellow rubber boots that were getting filled with water, and her gloves were soaked, and her old little pruney hands were shriveling up and literally getting cuts in them because of the water was so damp for so many hours, standing over a bent over a gosh damn dish sink for eight hours a gosh damn day like a gosh damn slave, like a peasant, like a piece of trash. And that's what Trump allowed to happen to her when she had all the evidence. So instead of, you know what, moving his administration you know what I would do if I was Trump? I would have said every day, we're gonna move the White House to Colorado. And every gosh damn day, I'm gonna hold a press conference out in front of Jenna Griswold's office. And I'm going to demand that my justice department, Pam Bondi, appoint a special counsel to investigate the election fraud in Colorado. But no. That would be too easy. Mean to tell me the most powerful man in the world has zero ability because it's a state charge, Ryan. It's not a federal. He can't partner. No shit. You think the most powerful man in the world who can end all these wars, who's gonna get a Nobel fucking peace prize, can't bring home a gold star mother who gave you every piece of evidence you needed to eradicate a wreck election fraud from the face of the earth? They don't wanna eradicate it. Why? Because his Jewish allies are the ones who staged it all, bro. You think Trump's coming to save you? Ask Tina Peters how she's gonna spend tomorrow. Oh, she's gonna spend it in a fucking jail cell. She will die in prison before this fucking man does a gosh damn thing to get her out. And that's the truth about our country. It's going to fucking hell because we are occupied by a foreign fucking government. We just let a foreign government buy a US social media platform so that they can take away your fucking freedom, so they can brainwash you, indoctrinate you into convincing you that you need to go to these indoctrination camps so that you'll just give away your fucking tax dollars to Israel. Israel has free fucking health care. They have free education. And Israel settlers can go and steal fucking land and live for free. The settlers. That's right. You heard me. The settlers get paid to go fucking steal land from Palestinians. Meaning, they don't have to work. Their government gives them a salary. They get the home for free. And they when they when they completely occupy it, they'll get electricity. They'll get everything for free because you are paying for it, America. You are paying their four zero one k's, their health care, their education. Meanwhile, your fucking children suffer. Meanwhile, the schools that your children are going to are giant indoctrination camps. They brainwash them into what? Oh, convincing you that it's a good idea to send your money to a foreign fucking country. We are an occupied nation, and it's a gosh damn shame that Tina Peters is gonna rot in jail until the day she dies because of this man is a fucking coward.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why are the constitutionally protected rights of the American citizens being violated by a foreign government I didn’t vote for Benjamin Netanyahu! https://t.co/Njw7vPe4Wv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 promotes cohost Didi and cites Tucker Carlson: "we are an occupied nation... we are allowing, number one, people that served in a foreign military to come over here and work and be American citizens with full citizenship and get things like access to our intelligence agencies." "We allow people that serve in foreign militaries to work in our intelligence agencies." "these foreign nations are literally buying TikTok with the money and the funding from an American who's the number one donor to the IDF." "this shit is absolutely crazy, and it has to stop." "check out this video." Speaker 1: "And the most important purchase... is class Followers. Five followers. TikTok." "Alex. X. X. Very good." "We should talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him." "Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight." Speaker 2: "It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera." "This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans." "The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk." "Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech." Speaker 0: "We're doing a house of life fundraiser in El Salvador... November 10 to eighteenth... see what a child trafficking rescue organization actually looks like that rescues pregnant teenage girls... Bob McDonald." "Leave links to the house of life. ... club cacao. ... screening of my new documentary... come join us in El Salvador in November. God bless you guys."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So all of the people, especially our cohost, like my amazing cohost, speak with Didi. If you guys aren't following her, please swing down there. I'll leave link right down below in the description. There's so much information out there, and it's coming at us so fast. So being able to just, like, surf through the Internet and and x and just try to scroll through all the garbage. I'm trying to put the people on your guys' radar that are putting out the best of the best work, and it's people like Didi. And this one's really, really important. It's Tucker Carlson. Like, he's telling you that we are an occupied nation. We have a foreign government that is literally we're allowing, number one, people that served in a foreign military to come over here and work and be American citizens with full citizenship and get things like access to our intelligence agencies. We allow people that serve in foreign militaries to work in our intelligence agencies. And you think that they're not feeding that intel to foreign nations? And now these foreign nations are literally buying TikTok with the money and the funding from an American who's the number one donor to the IDF. I mean, this shit is absolutely crazy, and it has to stop. And it's super important to follow people and support their work. So check out this video. Speaker 1: And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Speaker 2: Five followers. TikTok. Speaker 1: TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? Oh, Alex. X. X. Very good. And, you know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight. Speaker 2: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, and he's a sophisticated guy. He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, That person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way. And when that happened and various members of congress, like, no. Really, it's about China. Were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel. You you you kinda wish it was about China. Here he is just admitting. No. No. No. We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon. The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By the way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state. They're citizens of a nation that they own. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech. Speaker 0: And if you guys are enjoying the work and the content that I put out and you're interested in coming down to El Salvador, you guys know I do a lot of work with child trafficking. We're gonna be doing a house of life fundraiser during adopting Bitcoin. I believe the the event starts on November 10 and goes all the way to the eighteenth. So if you guys are interested and wanna see what a child trafficking rescue organization actually looks like that rescues pregnant teenage girls, most of which who have been raped and assaulted by their fathers, and you wanna see what the rehabilitation process looks like and the smile on these girls face when they are in an environment with a man who absolutely loves them. That man is named Bob McDonald. I'm gonna leave links to the house of life. I'm gonna leave links down to the club cacao. We're gonna be throwing an after party event. They're gonna be doing a screening of my new documentary. So if you guys wanna taste what freedom tastes like and feel what the American dream were to take feel like, come join us in El Salvador in November. God bless you guys.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

We have unregistered foreign agents who are funded with or tax dollars waging war on the relatives of American podcast who refused to support Israel’s genocide in Gaza. https://t.co/MpwjOYC7iQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ireland Dara discusses a video of Anna Kasparian, claiming: 'we now have a foreign agent, APAC, a foreign agent... to take your hard earned tax dollars, and send them to a foreign government.' She adds: 'using your tax dollars to target not you personally... but your family members.' 'Anna's husband is now getting targeted by these scumbags.' She warns: 'if you think they're not willing to kill Charlie Kirk to silence him after he was getting ready to cut ties with Israel, I think we're sadly mistaken.' She directs followers to 'Irelandaria' for the video. Additional remarks allege: 'Bill Ackman was very upset, and threats were made.' 'Charlie Kirk was summoned... a tumultuous, stormy meeting in the Hamptons' 'This was an under duress situation' 'one day after that meeting, Kirk commented on Megan Kelly's show.' 'If they can't touch me, they'll go after my husband.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in this next tweet by Ireland Dara, we're gonna talk about a video of Anna Kasparian. And in this video, I want you guys to pay attention. So we now have a foreign agent, APAC, an unregistered foreign agent. This is a lobby firm that lobbies on behalf of a foreign government so that they can convince or bribe or blackmail or buy off US politicians so that those US politicians can take your hard earned tax dollars, and they could send them to a foreign government. And now what that foreign government is doing or that foreign government lobby or lobby for the foreign government is doing is they're using your tax dollars to target not you personally for attacking them, but your family members. So Anna's husband is now getting targeted by these scumbags. And if you think they're not willing to kill Charlie Kirk to silence that man after he was literally getting ready to cut ties with Israel, I think we're sadly mistaken. I think there's a lot more going on here, and I think Americans need to wake up and see what's at stake and how evil these people are. So make sure you follow your follow Irelandaria. I believe that is how I pronounce that name. If I did pronounce it wrong, I'm sorry, but the link will be down in the descriptions. This account I've been following for I've been looking at for a while. I've been watching their content, consuming their content, and it finally got to the point today where I'm like, yeah, that encounter might follow. So check out this video. Speaker 1: And I'm also inclined to believe Candace Owens, to be honest with you, Speaker 2: Bill Ackman was very upset, and threats were made. A couple of weeks ago before Charlie lost his life, Charlie was in the Hamptons. Speaker 3: Tumultuous, stormy meeting held in the Hamptons during the August convened by the billionaire ultra Zionist financier, Bill Ackman, who's close to Netanyahu and his kind of network in The United States. Charlie Kirk was summoned, and Charlie Kirk was, according to one source, hammered by Ackman and others for allowing Israel critics, very prominent conservative voices like Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, or, the anti Zionist Jewish comedian Dave Smith to appear at his events. Speaker 2: It was at this time that BB Netanyahu was called, and Charlie was invited to Israel. This was an under duress situation, I would say, because I've been in these situations before. When I started asking very sensible questions about Israel as someone who had dedicated her political life to supporting Israel, many times alongside Charlie Kirk, I was met with the very same pressure. And just like Charlie was being invited to Israel, I was invited somewhere else. And when this arrived to me, it felt like a threat. Not like, hey. Come here, and we can educate you because you're my friend. More like, this is your last chance. Speaker 1: Okay. So just keep in mind that literally, okay, just one day after that meeting, Kirk made his comments, about the pressure he's facing and the criticism he's getting on Megan Kelly's show. Speaker 4: Honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. My moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Speaker 1: So the timeline makes sense. Everything adds up here. And I'm also inclined to believe Candace Owens, to be honest with you, because I have personally seen the wrath of pro Israel figures in this country threaten you. And if they see that they can't really do much about your employment, they'll go after your family members. They'll try to ruin your life. That's currently happening to my husband right now who's not a political figure at all, has never even uttered a word about Israel or what's happening with the genocide in Gaza. But since these people can't touch me, they're going after my husband and attempting to get him fired from a job that he loves. That's who these people are. They're despicable, despicable.
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 6:25 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Candace Owen’s just put Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, and the TPUSA donors in checkmate. https://t.co/0NK2JC6qRz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines 'the brilliance of Candace Owens' and says she 'literally smoking them out' with a video claim: 'forty eight hours prior to Charlie's death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA Jewish donors and a rabbi that he had no choice but to completely abandon the pro Israel cause outright.' The narrative cites a '$150,000,000 offer from Benjamin Netanyahu' to Turning Point USA 'to shield for Israel harder, and in particular to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza.' Kirk allegedly refused. They allege Bree Lynn Hollyhan appeared on Fox News and that Turning Point is 'rebranding as our new Charlie Kirk' with 'ultra mega.' They declare 'Charlie did not die pro Israel.' The piece ends with 'Checkmate motherfuckers.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me explain the brilliance of Candace Owens and what she just did. She's literally smoking them out. And everybody that's like, Candace didn't present any proof. That is the whole point. So let me show you this tweet by Mays really quick. So Mays puts out this video of Candace, which this story is freaking massive. I think this is gonna be the one that blows this entire investigation wide open. So Candice puts out a video, and she says forty eight hours prior to Charlie's death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA Jewish donors and a rabbi that he had no choice but to completely abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Then she went on to this video and also said that she was Charlie also wanted to bring her back to Turning Point, and it sounded like he was going to rebrand the organization. So why is this so important? Well, do you guys remember two weeks prior, according to Nick Fuentes, Charlie Kirk got a $150,000,000 offer from Benjamin Netanyahu if he would have defended Israel against Tucker and basically gone ultra ultra Israel MAGA is you mega, ultra mega if you will. Speaker 1: They say that Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150,000,000 by Israel. Okay. That would double Israel's budget, or excuse me, turning point USA's budget. Turning point USA has an annual budget of $140,000,000 Netanyahu offered turning point $150,000,000 for one purpose and one purpose only, to shield for Israel harder, and in particular to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza. And Charlie Kirk refused the money. And I have independently confirmed that, by the way. I've heard that from four people. Speaker 0: That's really important. So we confirmed that by Nick Fuentes. So if you trust Nick and the research that he's done and the research that Candice has done, the whole purpose of this, smoking them out. Right? Smoking them out. Because what just happened here? So now this is such a salacious claim against Turning Point, and the entire organization that is now completely flipped and went ultra mega with a Breland Holley fag, that douchebag. Right? They're re literally rebreath. He was on he was on Fox News within minutes, within an hour of the Charlie Kirk assassination. Bree Lynn Hollyhan magically gets a spot on Fox News. This little douchebag twid with faggot with tiny arms is flying around on private jets with his trust fund money, and they're gonna rebrand this as our new Charlie Kirk because he's ultra mega, baby. You guys you guys paying attention yet? This is a brilliant move by Candace Owens. She's a fucking g. I love Candace. Huge fan of the work she's doing. And everybody out here talking shit Candace doesn't have the receipts. Candace is always bringing the receipts. Always. And the New York Post the New York Post just put out the letter from Beebe. You guys yeah. Like, they put out the gun and the claims that Tyler Robinson was on a roof and he changed his clothes and he broke down his gun and he did this all in three seconds after pulling that shot. Are you guys paying attention to who's putting out the slop as we call it? The absolute garbage, the handcrafted talking points from the fucking White House. When do we start treading water for the White House? When do we start when did they start being cool to be the media, the propaganda arm of the White House, which is what Benny Johnson, Nick Sorter, and all those guys are now. They don't actually report. They don't do any investigations. And they're literally by completely turning a blind eye to this, whether they're involved in it or they know or or don't know, their career should be over. You should never respect these people. This is the biggest this is the biggest event of our lifetime. Why? Because it's unifying our whole country. We are all against Israel, and everybody's waking up. Not one American goes, yeah. I wanna wake up tomorrow and give 53% of my paycheck to Israel so their citizens can get free health care, free education. And if they wanna go steal land, if you wanna be a settler in Israel, you can literally go and steal land from a Palestinian, and the Israeli government will pay for your food. They'll pay for your electricity. They'll give you basically an allowance, aka our tax dollars are literally given to Israelis so they don't have to work, and they can go walk around with a r fifteens and steal land from Palestinians. It's called settling. Look it up. And then if you're done looking that up, look up what what a Mavitzka is. Look up the Jewish ritual on how they perform a circumcision and what the rabbi does in that circumcision. He literally sucks the bloody foreskin off the baby's penis or he rapes him after they mutilate his genitals. He's it's sick, dude. I can't make this shit up. And as far as Nick Fuentes goes, man, I think he maybe owes Camus an apology. Speaker 1: Have you ever considered inviting some of the released Israeli hostages to go on a speaking tour in The United States? This could be very effective. We're like halfway through the letter by the way. This is who Max Blumenthal and Candace Owens want us to believe was the second coming of Hitler. Israel needed to kill this guy because he was about to blow the lid on the whole operation? Speaker 2: Forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Okay. Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our on stage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no. Okay? Let's stop this ditching. Let's stop the dodging. Let's, like, explicitly, I wanna hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that. I want you to say no. No. It was just you know, he was feeling a little bit of pressure. No. I want you to literally answer what I have just said. It either happened or it didn't. I'm either making it all up or it happened exactly as I'm saying. And while we're at it, may I ask, what is the name of the Jewish donor who sponsored the Hamptons weekend? Okay? And to pastor Rob McCoy, were there any LLCs that you or your son were being paid through that sat outside of Turning Point. I'm asking that question genuinely. Yeah. I'm putting the fire here right at the feet of Turning Point because I am disgusted. I am genuinely disgusted. I am looking around and wondering whether Charlie's entire life was the Truman Show. None of you guys are behaving in the way that you should be behaving. Okay? There is no way you are letting these lies fly unless, as I am hearing, unless it is true that there was a big, big, big payday that was on the line. And if Charlie radically stated that he was done with Israel if if Charlie said he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause because of, and I quote, Jewish donors, the behavior of Jewish donors, if he said that, yes or no, well, then I don't know. Maybe maybe some people didn't wanna take that risk that he was kinda what? Become Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA with all of those presences so much presence across college campuses. Maybe they didn't wanna take a chance. You see, I'm just one person, so it's easy to just try to cancel my life and lie on me every second of every day. Returning Point USA, I think, got a little bit bigger than Charlie, and I'm no longer gonna allow this lie in this narrative. So answer the questions. Yes or no. And I'm going to, again, challenge you to lie. And if you do lie, I'm gonna expose the lies, and I'm gonna start dropping videos, actually. So that's where I'm at. Enough of the games. Enough with trying to allow Israel to wrangle a narrative that you know is not true. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. In fact, the friends of Israel were pressuring him really badly, and he was done, and he finally stood up for himself. Speaker 0: Checkmate motherfuckers.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Charlie Kirk told executives at TPUSA that he had no choice by to completely abandon his pro Israel stance. Then 48 hours later he was assassinated. https://t.co/5vWMVnQRyT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace Owens puts "the higher ups at Turning Point executives on blast" and challenges them to publicly release "a statement about her explosive statement regarding Charlie Kirk's position on Israel." She cites: "About forty eight hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish donors, and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright." She asks: "Did he express that?" and "did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no." "This changes fucking everything." The clip denounces "trans slop trans shooter agenda" as "they're fucking trash" and states "Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead." It adds: "only 24% of Americans actually are pro Israel at this point. That's it. 24%. Yet 98% of our government is pro Israel." It ends with "Bukele Two Point O, and we got a fucking bush light wrapped in shit."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This just changed everything. Holy shit. Wake up America. Shit's getting crazy. Alright. Check this out. So if you aren't following May's love 14 over on x, definitely give this woman a follow. Huge fan. She's the best cohost in the game. And she's been laser focused specifically on this Candace Owens. And holy shit, did Candace just bring the heat? So you gotta check out this tweet. I just gotta let me just read this. I mean, is so freaking big. Like, check this out. She says, wow. Candace Owens puts the higher ups at Turning Point executives on blast. She challenges them to publicly release a statement about her explosive statement regarding Charlie Kirk's position on Israel. She goes, about forty eight hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish donors, and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Listen to her entire statement, guys. This is absolutely changing everything. Nick Fuentes, there's nothing there was no signs Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. What the fuck? He got the call, bro. Check out this clip. Speaker 1: You don't high hide it. You don't try to obfuscate it. You don't try to say, well, wait until wait until the memorial events before we start looking into who murdered him. You tell the truth and you tell it immediately. And I don't think they're capable of doing that, and I have an idea as to why that is. I think the same people that were pressuring Charlie are pressuring them. In fact, I know that for a fact. So they might need my help. Okay? I'm gonna state this, and I'm gonna challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Okay? Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no. Okay? Let's stop this ditching. Let's stop the dodging. Let's, like, explicitly, I wanna hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that. I want you to say no. No. It was just, you know, he was feeling a little bit of pressure. No. I want you to literally answer what I have just said. It either happened or it didn't. I'm either making it all up or it happened exactly as I'm saying. Speaker 0: Fire, but she didn't stop there, and you're gonna wanna see what else she said. But you gotta do that by going down and following Meij. The link will be down there to this video. So what does this mean? I mean, this changes fucking everything. Everybody who wanted to tiptoe, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Ruggs, the people that just wanna be, oh, no. There was no Israel ties. I mean, Israel only has an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to assassinations. Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. This is Charlie Kirk, the most pro Israel ally ever was gonna turn on them? I don't see it happening. Oh, shit, bro. The writing's on the gosh damn walls. Wake up, America. Anybody who's been promoting this trans slop trans shooter agenda, they're fucking trash. They're carrying weight for this administration. They're selling you out. They're getting paid. They're getting access. They're getting money. They're getting fucking bonuses. They're getting sponsors. They're getting featured on Rumble. They're getting it all, baby. And you wanna know what you're getting? Higher electricity bills, higher gas prices, the dollar's hyperinflating, your government's robbing you gosh damn blind, and they're bankrupting your ass. You're giving 53% of your every paycheck you make to a government that hates you. And these ass clowns over here, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Rugs, they're fucking carrying that weight, bro. I mean, they're stroking. They would lick the fucking floor at Mar A Lago to take a selfie with fucking Trump. They ain't even swamp media. We'll call it slop media because that's all they do is just serve you loads of slop. You wanna what slop is? If you were to drain the swamp and there would be that repugnant, repulsive, stank ass fucking goo that's at the bottom of the swamp, that is the slop, the trans narrative slop that they are fucking serving you because you so badly wanna stay divided. Right? Don't come together, America. Don't you dare do that. Don't you dare come together and stand united because only 24% of Americans actually are pro Israel at this point. That's it. 24%. Yet 98% of our government is pro Israel, and we're supposed to believe that voting our way out of this is gonna happen? That's what we did here. We voted for Bukele Two Point O, and we got a fucking bush light wrapped in shit.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you remember when they taught us about the National Security Act of 1947 in school and told us we never had to worry about the CIA operating on US soil because it was against the law? The National Security Act on 1947 established the agency and explicitly limited its mandate https://t.co/zTvja3T5Gc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker lay out a conspiracy that "the CIA infiltrates local law enforcement agencies and they're delivering crack and selling cocaine," alleging drug dealers are working for the CIA and the agency aimed to push crack into Black neighborhoods in the eighties. They draw parallels to Candace Owens' claims about FBI infiltration of the local sheriff's department, noting "six CIA assets" inside a Utah university, including a professor and an intelligence/security specialist. They discuss a broader pattern: the CIA focusing on universities, with "Harvard" and "Kissinger" fronts, and the Office of Public Safety under USAID recruiting police chiefs worldwide, contributing to corruption and the Phoenix program in Vietnam. They cite Los Angeles Police Department CIA infiltration in the 70s-80s, and question the identity of "former deputy Mike Mitchell." They close by railing against a "digital slave state," a "401(k) Ponzi scheme," and the assassination of Tyler/Charlie, urging viewers to like.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is where you start getting to the point with our government and you're literally like, just what in the absolute fuck. Okay? Sorry for the drop all the f bombs, but I'm just so sick of this shit. So our CIA infiltrates local law enforcement agencies and they're literally delivering crack and selling cocaine. They have to infiltrate the law enforcement agencies because the law enforcement agencies would have did their job and arrested the drug dealers. But the drug dealers are working for the CIA, and the CIA wants to push a bunch of crack cocaine into the black neighborhoods in the eighties. So we're just gonna go, oh, yep. No big deal. We're just gonna let the CIA get away with it, which is what we did. So now when I drop this video today, wanna show you the parallels between what Candace Owens is showing us about the FBI being infiltrated or the FBI maybe of infiltrating the local sheriff's department because we have this big assassination. Right? And there's a lot of moving parts. You need to cover up a lot of shit. So you literally have to have agents already inside the sheriff's department, which is Utah. They're a fucking CIA cutout. Their universities are literally recruiting. The university is literally staffed, has six CIA assets, agents inside the university. One of them is a professor and the other two are one of another one is an intelligence specialist and a security specialist. So this is the deal. This is what this video is gonna be about today. So I'm gonna play the clip from Candice and then I'm gonna get into this clip from Redacted and it's gonna blow your mind. Colonel Townen Towner, if you are not following this girl, definitely swing down there and give this girl a follow. Her work is fantastic. She's done more exposing the CIA, the FBI, Mossad, and these intelligence agencies than anybody I've ever met. She was on the inside, so she knows. Check this out. Speaker 1: There's also something else that's weird that I want to mention here. And that is the unusual lengths in which the media and the sheriff's department they've gone through all of these lengths, I would say, to protect the identity of that former sheriff friend who was the one who convinced Tyler to turn himself in. Even in that press conference, by the way, Brooksby, I don't like the way he's moving. I don't like the way Nate Brooksby is breathing. I gotta be honest with you. It's a vibe. For no reason at all, he feels like he has to explain how he got on the phone with this sheriff friend of his. Like, nobody asked you whether or not it was usual for him to call you. He's kinda overexplaining here in my opinion. Take a listen. Speaker 2: At exactly 08:02 on the eleventh, I received a call from a friend of mine who happens to be a retired detective that worked for me for many years. I didn't put that out there initially. I wanted to protect that individual as much as possible. Right. Unfortunately, the court documents, which is standard, he was referenced as a retired Washington County deputy. So I didn't put that out there. It was in the court docs. I was trying to protect even that information and just saying retired law enforcement in general. Speaker 1: Why are you why are you trying to protect him? Why did you feel the need to explain to us earlier? It was it's not unusual for him to call me, this guy, but I have I'm fortunate that information is in documents that he was, you know, formally working for me and working with me. What do you mean? Speaker 0: Alright. Now in this next clip, colonel Towner is gonna go into exactly how really involved in corrupt and compromise local law enforcement agencies are, specifically in major cities or specific areas like these intel cities. Obviously, in Utah, exact same thing. Check this out. Speaker 3: But, I mean, what you're implying, and I'm not refuting this, but it's terrifying to think about that there are powerful people operating separate of our electorate who said, that guy, Charlie Kirk, he's gotta go because it would be infinitely useful to us. And and somebody marked him, people that and he trusted the US government. And so that I I find it not that it's not hard it's easy to digest, but terrifying to actually understand. Do you know what I mean? Speaker 4: So, again, it's not the US government per se. There are elements embedded in the US government that are orchestrating all of this, obviously, but it's not the collective US government. Because, again, I was part of it. I was never part of this. And that's the part I think most people struggle with is they want to collectively say it's the entire government when my observations is that the CIA has never taken directions from the US government. Have we had compliant presidents that kind of basically gave them full reign? Yes. I talk about those people as being the selected people, but occasionally you had like JFK, people that went against their direction, their, agenda, and bad things happen to those people. I think Trump is an example of that during his first term. He would not have been under constant attack for four years with coup after coup after coup had he been doing their bidding. They let people who do their bidding sit in that seat unopposed, and you have only to look at Biden and George Bush and George Bush senior and blah blah blah. So I do think that it is terrifying once that realization kind of sinks in. But let me speak just for a minute about the Charlie Kirk specifically. So, one of the and this has been true for eighty years. One of the main thrust that the CIA has focused on is our university system. There has been university after university, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, that have had institutions set up, and you just mentioned the CAI, which I think is hilarious since it's kind of the CIA disguised, that are literally funded through covert means by the CIA. Henry Kissinger had one set up at Harvard. And years later, it was outed as actually being a CIA front. And all they did once it got exposed as a CIA front was took his deputy, created another institution on Harvard, and put her over there in charge and just removed Henry Kissinger's name. So these things have existed for a very, very long time. And the CIA recruits at any university, and Utah is a great recruiting ground. You can go through article after article of CIA presence on primarily, Mormon campuses, and that's not a slight against the religion, but because Mormons are required to learn multiple languages and go to other countries. And so, by the time you get into college, you have all of this basket of skill sets that the CIA literally drools over. And so, they are a target. And that kind of plays into that. But I don't want anybody to think that the few examples that the one video woman was addressing is a unique thing. It is not. The CIA and let me just give you an example. In Vietnam, the Office of Public Safety under USAID set up a program at Michigan State University and also a satellite at Indiana University, which disturbed me deeply because that's my, alma mater. And the the CIA the staff was 100% CIA agents. And they picked that staff up from Michigan State University and deployed it under the guise of a program from that university and plopped it down into Vietnam, which blossomed into the Phoenix program. So if you were to go back and look at normal history, you'd go, oh, that was just a bunch of professors over there trying to teach the cops how to be cops. It was not. And if you do any research into the Office of Public Safety, you find out that they recruited police chiefs from across and senior police officers, which then goes to the corruption of police entities in The United States, which you have to know exists because, again, I'll skip over to Los Angeles. The Los just do a research, or a search on the Internet, not on Google, of Los Angeles Police Department and CIA, you're going to get a ton of articles written about the fact that the CIA had infiltrated the Los Angeles Police Department in a particular intelligence unit there during the 1980s, late seventies and eighties, when the crack cocaine explosion happened in Los Angeles. They knowingly targeted black neighborhoods with tons and tons of cocaine. And again, that information is all out there. So you have corruption at the local level. The Office of Public Safety under USAID, which was a CIA front, hired police chiefs and senior police officials to deploy all over the world and set up national police forces. And the national police forces were known for torture, assassination, and all kinds of atrocities. Speaker 2: Unbelievable. You're blowing my mind. I I Speaker 1: If he was formally working for you, that would mean he was a public figure, and this should be usual. Public figures, people that work for police departments are always public, and their informations are something their their name is someone we could easily research. It's nonsense. He's weird about this. He says that he retired. I think a journalist asks in the audience, like, you know, that former friend detective, how long has he been off the force? And he says, I don't know if we have that clip. Maybe we didn't cut that, Skyler, but he's like, three years. But, actually, we were able to figure out who that individual was. And it's I feel someone that we need to get in touch with. We've tried to get in touch with him. The name of that individual is is former deputy Mike Mitchell. Okay? Deputy Mike Mitchell. Now oddly, despite a career of twenty five years in the police force, I can't find a single trace of him in old newspapers. So I'm looking for more information on this guy. I understand that he knows Tyler through the Boy Scouts. He's involved in the LDS church. And I think Tyler was he was he was the Boy Scout leader. That's the connection there. We were able to confirm that this Mike Mitchell lives on the block, lives nearby as was told via via other sources. And thus far, we have only been able to even see a picture of him. There's just one picture or a set of pictures that we were able to find. And that, again, which would mean Brooksby lied a little bit. I don't like a little bit of lies because you usually have to lie a little bit when there's something bigger that you're afraid of. According to this post, he retired last January. Here it is. On the left, you have Brooksby. I don't trust that guy. Just don't trust him. And on the right hand side, you have today, we celebrated the career of detective Mike Mitchell after over twenty four years of serving. Twenty four years. Washington County, he is retiring starting in the jail back in 1999. Sheriff Brooksby and detective Mitchell both had some wonderful stories to share. We would like to give our heart felt thanks to detective Mitchell and all who came out to give him a warm send off. Congratulations, detective Mitchell. This is the only trace of this guy I could find. That's weird. I don't that is very odd. That is unusual. That is an anomaly. Speaker 0: You see what I'm saying? Like, at what point do we as Americans just wake the fuck up and go nothing is what we thought it was? Everything that we thought we were defending here as the American values, the American dream, like go to work, get a good job, go to school, put money in your four zero one k. Our children won't even be able to retire if they start putting money into their four zero one k at 18. A letter just broke last it was, like, couple months ago, and it stated that Gen z is now putting money into the retirement eight years earlier than Gen x, and they're still not gonna be able to retire because your four zero one k is a giant Ponzi scheme. The dollar's collapsing in real time. Everything we voted for, we're not getting. We're getting jerked off. We're getting circle jerked around by these intelligence agencies. And if you speak too much and you become a threat to their empire that they built here, this digital slave state that we're working ourselves towards, they fucking kill you, which is exactly what they did to Charlie. And any one of these fake mega fucking influencers out there, they I have lost so much respect. I thought, you know what? They got an empire to build. They they protect this. This is different. This is the they they assassinated one of us. And now you're gonna gonna go over here and carry water for this fucking administration when you can't even prove that Tyler Robinson was ever on the campus? We don't have one video yet, one photo, nothing. Twenty days after and they haven't showed us one visible provable fact that Tyler Robinson was at this campus. You can't make this shit up, guys. Smash that like button. We coming for it, baby.
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 7:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated that the FBI hasn’t provided any evidence of Tyler Robinson on the UVU campus. They falsely claimed that his parents turned him in after he confessed, and then pressured them into witness protection to avoid media contact. It feels like they fabricated text messages and the entire discord story. Meanwhile, many pro-Trump podcasts are blindly trusting the government, insisting they’re here to help and that Israel would never harm Charlie Kirk.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The FBI cannot produce one photo or video Tyler Robinson on the UVU campus. The FBI lied and claimed that Tyler Robinson’s parents turned himself in because he confessed to them. The FBI then convinced his parents to join witness protection so the media couldn’t speak with them. They fabricated text messages, they fabricated the discord story, and every pro Trump podcast in America is defaulting to. “I trust the government they’re here to help and Israel is our greatest ally and would never assassinate Charlie Kirk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over at the Patriot Prayer Network did a nice little compilation of my interview with Tim Pool... this literally twenty minute compilation which would blow your mind. Right now, Gen Z support for Israel is 24%. Charlie Kirk has been holding meetings to convince Gen Z influencers to support Israel. In 2018, Netanyahu himself sent a secret letter to the Qatari leadership. In that letter, he urged Qatar to deliver $30,000,000 a month to Gaza. So in May 2025, Netanyahu publicly admitted that since 2018, his government had allowed Qatar to transfer money to Hamas in Gaza, and that was according to his own request. That policy was approved by the full Israeli security cabinet. So if you believe Netanyahu himself, he went from asking Qatar to send money to Hamas to bombing Qatar for not extraditing Hamas. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this. To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Yep. I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Israel is losing support at a tremendous rate among the young generation. Ackman ... had this meeting to basically bully Charlie Kirk into submission. Charlie Kirk walked away, refused offers of funding and also refused the offer to travel to Israel and meet with Netanyahu. From Aramov, he says Turkey took out Charlie because he spoke against Islam. Israel killed their greatest advocate among Gen Z.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over at the Patriot Prayer Network did a nice little compilation of my interview with Tim Pool where Tim Pool is trying to state his facts and he's saying some things. And he went back through and grabbed media clips and he's put together this literally twenty minute compilation which would blow your mind. So basically, every time that Tim basically makes a statement or an accusation, he goes back through and grabs evidence and proof and basically rebuttals and adds to exactly what I was saying in the conversation. So it's a really interesting video. Make sure you guys swing over at Patriot prayer and give that man a follow. God bless you guys. Check this out. Speaker 1: Right now, Gen Z support for Israel is 24%. Charlie Kirk has been holding meetings to convince Gen Z influencers to support Israel. Speaker 0: Why did he turn out a 150,000,000 from Netanyahu then? Speaker 1: Didn't want it? I don't know. Speaker 0: I think he was I think he was waking up to the fact of what was going on in Gaza. Speaker 1: I think it's silly to argue simultaneously that he had a secret meeting with Bill Ackman in the Hamptons to convince Gen Z to support Israel, and then Israel killed him. Speaker 2: Kirk openly questioned the story Israel was trying to tell the world about October 7. Speaker 3: Think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. Speaker 2: There's also another country that asked Qatar to support Hamas. It was Israel. In 2018, Netanyahu himself sent a secret letter to the Qatari leadership. In that letter, he urged Qatar to deliver $30,000,000 a month to Gaza. He said this funding would help reduce the motivation of terror groups to carry out attacks, prevent a humanitarian crisis, and preserve regional stability. So in May 2025, Netanyahu publicly admitted that since 2018, his government had allowed Qatar to transfer money to Hamas in Gaza, and that was according to his own request. That policy was approved by the full Israeli security cabinet. So if you believe Netanyahu himself, he went from asking Qatar to send money to Hamas to bombing Qatar for not extraditing Hamas. Speaker 3: But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this. To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Yep. I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Okay? Speaker 1: So so the argument right now on Israel is Israel is losing support at a tremendous rate among the young generation. Charlie Kirk is holding interventions. Like, you you saw the video where he sat down with these Gen Z guys? Yeah. He's like, don't don't be mad at Israel. And then Netanyahu was like, how can we get rid of this guy who's our greatest advocate for Gen Z? That makes no sense. A few moments later. Speaker 4: But it seemed true to me, and I had done some work on that. I knew a bunch of people pretty close to that story. I thought that. I said that to Charlie and I said, But I'm not going to say that because I don't want make your donors mad. Know it's just going to be like an endless flurry of text telling you to stop or you're going to lose a bunch of funding. He looked at me, I'll never forget it, and said, go all the way. Do it. Go all the way. I said, man, I you know, a lot of things I can talk about. I don't need to talk about that. And he said, do it. So I did it. By the way, I think that that conversation hit a mic on and so did I. It probably exists somewhere. Speaker 1: The the what honestly makes more sense, we got one super chat. Let me let me see if I can Speaker 4: find this Speaker 1: one. Here we go. From Aramov, he says Turkey took out Charlie because he spoke against Islam. If we're talking I I I don't think either of those are true, but I get the point being made. People are like, Israel killed their greatest advocate among Gen Z. Why would they do that? Speaker 5: Doesn't make any sense. Speaker 0: Well, I think that he was I think that you you put all this money into this man. You have an investment, and then you're, like, looking at the two weeks, maybe three weeks of his life, and you're going, oh, if this man is turning, if he is going to stand up and speak out against what happened in Gaza. I mean, he was on the Patrick Deb David show saying, like, listen. When I I was in Israel, and it took me forty five minutes to get into a chopper and fly across the country. So you're you're mean to tell me that for six hours that Israel didn't respond to the attacks on October 7, and he's going, how is that possible? He goes, it's not possible. I wanna know. Was there a stand down order? So he was really starting to dive in. The Epstein list too, he's one of the biggest advocates for at least the entire Epstein list. Speaker 1: Why is Fuentes still alive? Speaker 0: Why is Fuentes still alive? Yeah. It's a great question. I don't know. Speaker 1: Maybe he's gonna kill Charlie If the argument is that Israel's like, uh-oh, this Speaker 0: Nick Nick Fuentes didn't have he didn't have the youth at every single university. Charlie Kirk was their biggest ally and he was the one literally the one person capable of turning if he turned against Israel, the entire youth, the last 24% would pretty much evaporate overnight. So you have somebody in a in a position of power that was literally, oh, I think gearing up to be in the next presidential run. Think Charlie Kirk could have been the next Speaker 5: But look, even that's long term because young people historically don't vote. So even if they don't support Israel, right? You still got the majority of voters in The US are gonna be the boomers, people 55 and older. So it'll still take time. Yeah. It's it's it'll still take time for that that that voting block to actually have enough influence to change policy. I just Brand Speaker 1: And you start getting all of this narrative stuff where it's like, did you know that Charlie Kirk was a he would he was quite Speaker 6: years again in December, and he had just added to, his TPUSA major, I think it's called America Fest in December, the premier critic of Israel in congress. I didn't say republican critic. I just said premier critic because that's what she is now. Marjorie Taylor Greene, which really reflected his shifting views. And Ackman, according to multiple sources, had this meeting to basically bully Charlie Kirk into submission. Charlie Kirk walked away, according to one person, feeling like there was an attempt to blackmail him. He refused, any offers of funding and also refused the offer to travel to Israel and meet with Netanyahu, which Netanyahu disclosed in the wake, the immediate wake of Netanyahu's death. He talked about this letter, but he didn't say whether Charlie Kirk refused or accepted. I've learned since that he refused. And then beyond that, he was becoming so alienated by this crowd of pro Israel enforcers.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Why are we talking about MK Ultra when the FBI can’t produce one photo or one video of Tyler Robinson on the Utah Valley University campus. https://t.co/v6ww3TcrE0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says he lost respect for Alex Jones over "cram that that trans shooter slopped on our throat," noting numerous messages about it. He cites "breaking. Tyler Robinson confirmed to be in a CIA advanced program for college students. Where? The Center for Anticipate Intelligence" and claims "defense contractors are waiving the preliminary hearing." He adds, "If this lawyer waivers the preliminary hearing, then I would say that Tyler Robinson is an MK Ultra style program." The critique includes "FBI can't show us one photo, not one video, not one shred of evidence that Tyler Robinson was ever on that campus," and notes "Candace's video" about witness protection and says "they're trying to pin the death penalty on an innocent kid." "I still do. He's a legend."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Video here on this video that Alex Jones made out because I used to have a lot of respect for this man. And the amount of people, Alex, just to let you know what you're doing, I don't know what it is. I've been watching your content. I've been completely ignoring it since you started to try to cram that that trans shooter slopped on our throat. So I've completely been ignoring it. And then I get sent this today from another person. It's like, I don't know, at least fifteen, twenty, which is a lot for me to have that many individual people reaching out to me. I'm not saying it's thousands, but I'm saying it's a lot, Alex. And that should should warn you that, like, people are wondering what the hell you're doing. And now I wake up to this. It says breaking. Tyler Robinson confirmed to be in a CIA advanced program for college students. Where? The Center for Anticipate Intelligence as he is, defense contractors are waiving the preliminary hearing. If this lawyer waivers the preliminary hearing, then I would say that Tyler Robinson is an MK Ultra style program. And then, like, I mean, you listen to the the interview with the lady, and she clearly states that they don't intend to waiver his preliminary hearing. And I know attorneys, I don't even know what the hell that means. But then it goes on to and gets community noted, and it says the lawyer in this video discusses and shares reasons why they wish not to waiver their preliminary hearing. The claim in this video that Tyler Robinson is confirmed to be CIA in a CIA program and has no sources to back it up. Speaker 1: There was some discussion about waiving the preliminary hearing. The preliminary hearing is an opportunity as Palmoro said to have a mini trial. You get evidence, you can cross examine witnesses, it's determining probable cause. Speaker 2: We recognize that we are here today for a waiver hearing. We it is not our intent to waive a preliminary hearing in this matter. We are gonna be seeking that one be set. However, based largely on what the state just referred to as far as voluminous nature of the discovery materials, we do think it would be prudent to simply reset for another conference, another waiver hearing, a little bit down the road where we have a better idea once we start seeing the discovery as it rolls in. Speaker 3: Boy, if his lawyers waive the preliminary hearing, then I would say that Tyler Robinson is in MK Ultra style program because those exist. Tim McVeigh was handled by the deputy head of MK Ultra, West. The Unabomber was handled by the deputy head of MK Ultra, Jollian West, his boss Ewan Cameron, the head of the program. And it goes on and on. I mean, that Was it Sirhan Sirhan too? Yeah. Like, oh oh, hello. Let me take care. The feds have attached this is your psychiatrist. Hi. I'm Jollian West. I ran the MK Ultra program. Oh, and I also was the attending psychiatrist for Jack Rubenstein. Jack Ruby. Yeah. There he is. I mean so so so and it's real simple. They just electroshock somebody so much that they don't remember six months back. Speaker 0: You know, this is what I have to say. Like, the FBI can't show us one photo, not one video, not one shred of evidence that Tyler Robinson was ever on that on that campus at that time. Like, we've had better we have better CCTV footage of the Sandy Hook shooting in 1998 than we have of Tyler Robinson. Was it the Valdi shooter that the photos were leaked two days after? The Nashville trans shooter, the the videos released released two days later? I mean, it's almost every one of these. We pretty much had a rock solid video evidence of this man or this woman in this or this trans dude inside this school within a matter of seconds, and yet we don't have anything. We don't have one video, nothing that confirms that Tyler Robinson was actually on that campus. So to go from that, when you when you when you understand that the FBI is covering it up, why go to MK Ultra? Why not stay focused on the fact that the FBI is lying to us and they're refusing to release CCTV footage that'll blow their entire narrative out of the water? Candace's video last yesterday stated that the that the parents were basically coaxed by the FBI into putting themselves into witness protection. So why are the parents being told that they need to go into witness protection to save them lives save their lives so that they don't talk to the press? And they're saying everything that the media is running, the narratives, the suicide, all of it, it's not true? This kid's never gonna see a courtroom. And now they're trying to pin the death penalty on an innocent kid. I think that's more important to headline than MK Alter, which is obviously a lie. This video was shared to discuss reasons why the attorney is trying to not waiver his preliminary hearing. I don't get this whatsoever. But I had a lot of respect for Alex, man. I still do. He's a legend. Just sucks, I wish he was on our side. It doesn't seem like that for some reason on this one.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If they think we’re just gonna sit by and let them sweep the Charlie Kirk assassination under the rug. I’ve got a few words for you! https://t.co/UnSr7JZOMD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Shadow of the Ezra released a video praising his promotion of the speaker's “child trafficking documentaries” and commenting on Kaina Zowen's claim that she’s “the only one questioning the narrative” about Charlie Kirk. He targets Jack Posobic, Benny Johnson, and Ben Shapiro as “that dirtbag from Turning Point USA” and argues Kirk delivered him into the White House, framing it as “the Bookelly mandate” and “the Bushlight two point o.” He denounces opponents as “cowards” and declares “It's the Gripers war” while asserting the Internet wins. He contends Kirk “took a bullet to the neck” and accuses others of “covering up” the assassination for “Vance.” Speaker 1 says he's the “only person... demanding further investigation,” asking, “Where are Charlie's homies?” Speaker 0 closes with a vow to bring everyone after subscribers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Video right here that Shadow of the Ezra just dropped, and this is way overdue. Right? This man right here, Shadow of the Ezra, has gone out of his way to promote my child trafficking documentaries more than anybody. And I wanna get into this tweet. I won't over talk it. But Kaina Zowen says, she's the only one questioning the narrative on why all of Charlie Kirk's closest friends have stayed silent and refused to challenge the FBI's official version of events, noticing even Turning Point USA has gone quiet. What the hell? She says that she's the only one demanding answers even though everyone else can see that there's clearly holes in his narrative. And she and then Shadow of the Ezra, I like it. He calls out Jack Posobic, Benny Johnson, Ben Shapiro on that dirtbag from Turning Point USA. Just imagine this, dude. Kirk was supposed to be your boy. Right? Kirk right here, that man is in office because of the work that Charlie Kirk and Turning Point did, period. Full stop. Benny Johnson wasn't enough. Cullen Rugg wasn't enough. Every single MAGA voice in the media wasn't enough. You guys needed the hearts and minds of the youth, and that's what Charlie Kirk did for this man. He delivered him. He put him back in the White House, and we've put him there. We gave him the house. We gave him the senate, and we gave him the executive. We gave him the Bookelly mandate, and we got the Bushlight two point o, period. Full stop. And you cowards and you faggots over there. You think we're just gonna look the other way? You're like, oh, woah. Fucking. Who's gonna investigate this? It ain't gonna be it ain't gonna be the Gripers. Well, you guessed wrong, bitch, because it is gonna be the fucking Gripers. It's always the Gripers. It's the Gripers war that have been changing the narrative from the beginning of time, and it's the Gripers that are gonna come here and fucking prevent you from force feeding your slop to the gosh damn audience. Everybody's awake. This isn't 2016. This isn't 2020. The game has changed, the Internet wins every fucking time, and y'all are getting fucking cooked. Every day, you faggots try to cover up this gosh damn narrative. The more and more people like me wake up, more and more people. And my voice gets bigger and yours gets smaller, and the trust that you used to have dwindles day by day by day. You guys are fucking turning point. You guys are fucking CNN in the making, bro. You guys are Fox News fucking light now. You guys are fucking cowards. And your boy, not him, the other boy, Charlie Kirk, took a fucking bullet to the neck, and you guys are sitting there covering up. You guys are covering up for the assassination of Charlie Kirk for what purpose? So you can put your boy Vance in the fucking White House so his wife can come out there and talk about how Judy Vance I just wanna personally thank Judy Vance. We see it, bro. Vance is Obama two point o, and we ain't buying the slop. You know who could have beat Vance? Charlie Kirk. You know who had the youth vote? Charlie Kirk. You know who had done more as a patriot for this country than any one of you fucking combined? It's Charlie Kirk. And he did it from the grassroots, he built that shit from the ground up where you guys just go over and steal and rip other people's fucking content and haven't broke a true fucking story. Oh my gosh. AOC lives at her mom's house in fucking Columbia. Who gives a fuck? That shit's gay as fuck. You haven't broke a real story since fucking ever. You steal that shit from everybody else. We know who you came from, Newsmax faggots. Speaker 1: I'm uncomfortable with the fact that despite all of the friends that Charlie Kirk made, all the schmoozing that he did, presidents, rights, department heads, I am the only person that is publicly demanding further investigation assassination. Why? Trevor, it's totally rubbing me the wrong way. Something's not right here. Even even Turning Point USA, they're just like, we've accepted obviously, there are holes in this narrative, and they're just like, we're gonna just keep up his shut. What is going on? Actually, I'm just waiting for everybody to, like, join me. Where where where are Charlie's homies at? Why are you guys all silent? Something's not right. I know it's not right. Okay? We don't know now, but we know. You know? We don't know now, but we know. And soon, we're gonna know now. Speaker 0: I'm bringing up every fucking buddy with me, and we're all coming for your subscribers, every last one of them.
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 4:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on Charlie Kirk's abrupt shift away from his pro-Israel stance just before his assassination. Candace Owens has been vocal about this, demanding that Turning Point USA address the situation publicly. I'm curious about Erika Kirk's response now that she is CEO. Many are rallying behind Candace, recognizing her commitment to truth, and some believe she has evidence that could expose attempts to cover up the circumstances surrounding Kirk's death. The conversation is intense, with various opinions circulating about the implications of these events.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Charlie Kirk told executives at TPUSA that he had no choice by to completely abandon his pro Israel stance. Then 48 hours later he was assassinated. https://t.co/5vWMVnQRyT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace Owens publicly pressures Turning Point USA executives to address her explosive claim about Charlie Kirk's stance on Israel and his death. She states: "Forty eight hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish donors, and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright." She asks, "Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen?" and demands: "I want Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true." A speaker adds: "You tell the truth and you tell it immediately." The clip asserts "There was no signs Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead" and questions whether "the most pro Israel ally ever" would turn on them. It closes with broader anti-media and anti-government rhetoric, citing "24% Americans pro Israel" and "98% of our government pro Israel."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This just changed everything. Holy shit. Wake up America. Shit's getting crazy. Alright. Check this out. So if you aren't following May's love 14 over on x, definitely give this woman a follow. Huge fan. She's the best cohost in the game. And she's been laser focused specifically on this Candace Owens. And holy shit, did Candace just bring the heat? So you gotta check out this tweet. I just gotta let me just read this. I mean, is so freaking big. Like, check this out. She says, wow. Candace Owens puts the higher ups at Turning Point executives on blast. She challenges them to publicly release a statement about her explosive statement regarding Charlie Kirk's position on Israel. She goes, about forty eight hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish donors, and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Listen to her entire statement, guys. This is absolutely changing everything. Nick Fuentes, there's nothing there was no signs Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. What the fuck? He got the call, bro. Check out this clip. Speaker 1: You don't high hide it. You don't try to obfuscate it. You don't try to say, well, wait until wait until the memorial events before we start looking into who murdered him. You tell the truth and you tell it immediately. And I don't think they're capable of doing that, and I have an idea as to why that is. I think the same people that were pressuring Charlie are pressuring them. In fact, I know that for a fact. So they might need my help. Okay? I'm gonna state this, and I'm gonna challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Okay? Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our onstage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no. Okay? Let's stop this ditching. Let's stop the dodging. Let's, like, explicitly, I wanna hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that. I want you to say no. No. It was just, you know, he was feeling a little bit of pressure. No. I want you to literally answer what I have just said. It either happened or it didn't. I'm either making it all up or it happened exactly as I'm saying. Speaker 0: Fire, but she didn't stop there, and you're gonna wanna see what else she said. But you gotta do that by going down and following Meij. The link will be down there to this video. So what does this mean? I mean, this changes fucking everything. Everybody who wanted to tiptoe, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Ruggs, the people that just wanna be, oh, no. There was no Israel ties. I mean, Israel only has an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to assassinations. Israel had no reason to want Charlie Kirk dead. This is Charlie Kirk, the most pro Israel ally ever was gonna turn on them? I don't see it happening. Oh, shit, bro. The writing's on the gosh damn walls. Wake up, America. Anybody who's been promoting this trans slop trans shooter agenda, they're fucking trash. They're carrying weight for this administration. They're selling you out. They're getting paid. They're getting access. They're getting money. They're getting fucking bonuses. They're getting sponsors. They're getting featured on Rumble. They're getting it all, baby. And you wanna know what you're getting? Higher electricity bills, higher gas prices, the dollar's hyperinflating, your government's robbing you gosh damn blind, and they're bankrupting your ass. You're giving 53% of your every paycheck you make to a government that hates you. And these ass clowns over here, the Benny Johnson, the Cullen Rugs, they're fucking carrying that weight, bro. I mean, they're stroking. They would lick the fucking floor at Mar A Lago to take a selfie with fucking Trump. They ain't even swamp media. We'll call it slop media because that's all they do is just serve you loads of slop. You wanna what slop is? If you were to drain the swamp and there would be that repugnant, repulsive, stank ass fucking goo that's at the bottom of the swamp, that is the slop, the trans narrative slop that they are fucking serving you because you so badly wanna stay divided. Right? Don't come together, America. Don't you dare do that. Don't you dare come together and stand united because only 24% of Americans actually are pro Israel at this point. That's it. 24%. Yet 98% of our government is pro Israel, and we're supposed to believe that voting our way out of this is gonna happen? That's what we did here. We voted for Bukele Two Point O, and we got a fucking bush light wrapped in shit.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Do you remember when they taught us about the National Security Act of 1947 in school and told us we never had to worry about the CIA operating on US soil because it was against the law? The National Security Act on 1947 established the agency and explicitly limited its mandate to foreign intelligence activities. Specifically, “Section 104 D-1”of the Act states: "The CIA shall have no police, subpoena, law-enforcement powers, or internal-security functions." This provision was designed to prevent the CIA from engaging in domestic law enforcement, surveillance, or security operations, roles reserved for agencies like the FBI, and to protect civil liberties by keeping the agency's focus abroad.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"So our CIA infiltrates local law enforcement agencies and they're literally delivering crack and selling cocaine." "The CIA wants to push a bunch of crack cocaine into the black neighborhoods in the eighties." "The university is literally staffed, has six CIA assets, agents inside the university. One of them is a professor and the other two are one of another one is an intelligence specialist and a security specialist." "The CIA recruits at any university, and Utah is a great recruiting ground." "The Office of Public Safety under USAID" and the Phoenix program are referenced as CIA fronts to deploy police chiefs and create national police forces. The discussion cites the Los Angeles Police Department and CIA infiltration in the 1970s-80s. "They assassinated one of us." The narrative also claims, "Gen z is now putting money into the retirement eight years earlier than Gen x, and they're still not gonna be able to retire because your four zero one k is a giant Ponzi scheme."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is where you start getting to the point with our government and you're literally like, just what in the absolute fuck. Okay? Sorry for the drop all the f bombs, but I'm just so sick of this shit. So our CIA infiltrates local law enforcement agencies and they're literally delivering crack and selling cocaine. They have to infiltrate the law enforcement agencies because the law enforcement agencies would have did their job and arrested the drug dealers. But the drug dealers are working for the CIA, and the CIA wants to push a bunch of crack cocaine into the black neighborhoods in the eighties. So we're just gonna go, oh, yep. No big deal. We're just gonna let the CIA get away with it, which is what we did. So now when I drop this video today, wanna show you the parallels between what Candace Owens is showing us about the FBI being infiltrated or the FBI maybe of infiltrating the local sheriff's department because we have this big assassination. Right? And there's a lot of moving parts. You need to cover up a lot of shit. So you literally have to have agents already inside the sheriff's department, which is Utah. They're a fucking CIA cutout. Their universities are literally recruiting. The university is literally staffed, has six CIA assets, agents inside the university. One of them is a professor and the other two are one of another one is an intelligence specialist and a security specialist. So this is the deal. This is what this video is gonna be about today. So I'm gonna play the clip from Candice and then I'm gonna get into this clip from Redacted and it's gonna blow your mind. Colonel Townen Towner, if you are not following this girl, definitely swing down there and give this girl a follow. Her work is fantastic. She's done more exposing the CIA, the FBI, Mossad, and these intelligence agencies than anybody I've ever met. She was on the inside, so she knows. Check this out. Speaker 1: There's also something else that's weird that I want to mention here. And that is the unusual lengths in which the media and the sheriff's department they've gone through all of these lengths, I would say, to protect the identity of that former sheriff friend who was the one who convinced Tyler to turn himself in. Even in that press conference, by the way, Brooksby, I don't like the way he's moving. I don't like the way Nate Brooksby is breathing. I gotta be honest with you. It's a vibe. For no reason at all, he feels like he has to explain how he got on the phone with this sheriff friend of his. Like, nobody asked you whether or not it was usual for him to call you. He's kinda overexplaining here in my opinion. Take a listen. Speaker 2: At exactly 08:02 on the eleventh, I received a call from a friend of mine who happens to be a retired detective that worked for me for many years. I didn't put that out there initially. I wanted to protect that individual as much as possible. Right. Unfortunately, the court documents, which is standard, he was referenced as a retired Washington County deputy. So I didn't put that out there. It was in the court docs. I was trying to protect even that information and just saying retired law enforcement in general. Speaker 1: Why are you why are you trying to protect him? Why did you feel the need to explain to us earlier? It was it's not unusual for him to call me, this guy, but I have I'm fortunate that information is in documents that he was, you know, formally working for me and working with me. What do you mean? Speaker 0: Alright. Now in this next clip, colonel Towner is gonna go into exactly how really involved in corrupt and compromise local law enforcement agencies are, specifically in major cities or specific areas like these intel cities. Obviously, in Utah, exact same thing. Check this out. Speaker 3: But, I mean, what you're implying, and I'm not refuting this, but it's terrifying to think about that there are powerful people operating separate of our electorate who said, that guy, Charlie Kirk, he's gotta go because it would be infinitely useful to us. And and somebody marked him, people that and he trusted the US government. And so that I I find it not that it's not hard it's easy to digest, but terrifying to actually understand. Do you know what I mean? Speaker 4: So, again, it's not the US government per se. There are elements embedded in the US government that are orchestrating all of this, obviously, but it's not the collective US government. Because, again, I was part of it. I was never part of this. And that's the part I think most people struggle with is they want to collectively say it's the entire government when my observations is that the CIA has never taken directions from the US government. Have we had compliant presidents that kind of basically gave them full reign? Yes. I talk about those people as being the selected people, but occasionally you had like JFK, people that went against their direction, their, agenda, and bad things happen to those people. I think Trump is an example of that during his first term. He would not have been under constant attack for four years with coup after coup after coup had he been doing their bidding. They let people who do their bidding sit in that seat unopposed, and you have only to look at Biden and George Bush and George Bush senior and blah blah blah. So I do think that it is terrifying once that realization kind of sinks in. But let me speak just for a minute about the Charlie Kirk specifically. So, one of the and this has been true for eighty years. One of the main thrust that the CIA has focused on is our university system. There has been university after university, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, that have had institutions set up, and you just mentioned the CAI, which I think is hilarious since it's kind of the CIA disguised, that are literally funded through covert means by the CIA. Henry Kissinger had one set up at Harvard. And years later, it was outed as actually being a CIA front. And all they did once it got exposed as a CIA front was took his deputy, created another institution on Harvard, and put her over there in charge and just removed Henry Kissinger's name. So these things have existed for a very, very long time. And the CIA recruits at any university, and Utah is a great recruiting ground. You can go through article after article of CIA presence on primarily, Mormon campuses, and that's not a slight against the religion, but because Mormons are required to learn multiple languages and go to other countries. And so, by the time you get into college, you have all of this basket of skill sets that the CIA literally drools over. And so, they are a target. And that kind of plays into that. But I don't want anybody to think that the few examples that the one video woman was addressing is a unique thing. It is not. The CIA and let me just give you an example. In Vietnam, the Office of Public Safety under USAID set up a program at Michigan State University and also a satellite at Indiana University, which disturbed me deeply because that's my, alma mater. And the the CIA the staff was 100% CIA agents. And they picked that staff up from Michigan State University and deployed it under the guise of a program from that university and plopped it down into Vietnam, which blossomed into the Phoenix program. So if you were to go back and look at normal history, you'd go, oh, that was just a bunch of professors over there trying to teach the cops how to be cops. It was not. And if you do any research into the Office of Public Safety, you find out that they recruited police chiefs from across and senior police officers, which then goes to the corruption of police entities in The United States, which you have to know exists because, again, I'll skip over to Los Angeles. The Los just do a research, or a search on the Internet, not on Google, of Los Angeles Police Department and CIA, you're going to get a ton of articles written about the fact that the CIA had infiltrated the Los Angeles Police Department in a particular intelligence unit there during the 1980s, late seventies and eighties, when the crack cocaine explosion happened in Los Angeles. They knowingly targeted black neighborhoods with tons and tons of cocaine. And again, that information is all out there. So you have corruption at the local level. The Office of Public Safety under USAID, which was a CIA front, hired police chiefs and senior police officials to deploy all over the world and set up national police forces. And the national police forces were known for torture, assassination, and all kinds of atrocities. Speaker 2: Unbelievable. You're blowing my mind. I I Speaker 1: If he was formally working for you, that would mean he was a public figure, and this should be usual. Public figures, people that work for police departments are always public, and their informations are something their their name is someone we could easily research. It's nonsense. He's weird about this. He says that he retired. I think a journalist asks in the audience, like, you know, that former friend detective, how long has he been off the force? And he says, I don't know if we have that clip. Maybe we didn't cut that, Skyler, but he's like, three years. But, actually, we were able to figure out who that individual was. And it's I feel someone that we need to get in touch with. We've tried to get in touch with him. The name of that individual is is former deputy Mike Mitchell. Okay? Deputy Mike Mitchell. Now oddly, despite a career of twenty five years in the police force, I can't find a single trace of him in old newspapers. So I'm looking for more information on this guy. I understand that he knows Tyler through the Boy Scouts. He's involved in the LDS church. And I think Tyler was he was he was the Boy Scout leader. That's the connection there. We were able to confirm that this Mike Mitchell lives on the block, lives nearby as was told via via other sources. And thus far, we have only been able to even see a picture of him. There's just one picture or a set of pictures that we were able to find. And that, again, which would mean Brooksby lied a little bit. I don't like a little bit of lies because you usually have to lie a little bit when there's something bigger that you're afraid of. According to this post, he retired last January. Here it is. On the left, you have Brooksby. I don't trust that guy. Just don't trust him. And on the right hand side, you have today, we celebrated the career of detective Mike Mitchell after over twenty four years of serving. Twenty four years. Washington County, he is retiring starting in the jail back in 1999. Sheriff Brooksby and detective Mitchell both had some wonderful stories to share. We would like to give our heart felt thanks to detective Mitchell and all who came out to give him a warm send off. Congratulations, detective Mitchell. This is the only trace of this guy I could find. That's weird. I don't that is very odd. That is unusual. That is an anomaly. Speaker 0: You see what I'm saying? Like, at what point do we as Americans just wake the fuck up and go nothing is what we thought it was? Everything that we thought we were defending here as the American values, the American dream, like go to work, get a good job, go to school, put money in your four zero one k. Our children won't even be able to retire if they start putting money into their four zero one k at 18. A letter just broke last it was, like, couple months ago, and it stated that Gen z is now putting money into the retirement eight years earlier than Gen x, and they're still not gonna be able to retire because your four zero one k is a giant Ponzi scheme. The dollar's collapsing in real time. Everything we voted for, we're not getting. We're getting jerked off. We're getting circle jerked around by these intelligence agencies. And if you speak too much and you become a threat to their empire that they built here, this digital slave state that we're working ourselves towards, they fucking kill you, which is exactly what they did to Charlie. And any one of these fake mega fucking influencers out there, they I have lost so much respect. I thought, you know what? They got an empire to build. They they protect this. This is different. This is the they they assassinated one of us. And now you're gonna gonna go over here and carry water for this fucking administration when you can't even prove that Tyler Robinson was ever on the campus? We don't have one video yet, one photo, nothing. Twenty days after and they haven't showed us one visible provable fact that Tyler Robinson was at this campus. You can't make this shit up, guys. Smash that like button. We coming for it, baby.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Unregistered foreign agents waving Israel's flag while pulling US strings? That's not patriotism, it's infiltration. https://t.co/fJv8fFV26e

Video Transcript AI Summary
An adamant former pro-Trump advocate says he gave up prominent pro-Trump channels and resources to push the message, arguing that despite Trump getting into office, nothing has changed and he now fears a potential confrontation with China; he references Red Pill Syrian's take on China's view of 'god's chosen people.' A segment presents a stark extremist confession: "I believe in racial holy war and the total extermination of the Jews. I'm a national socialist. ... Jews are humanoid viruses." Another portion covers media and political figures—Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Charlie Kirk—discussing online chaos, a supposed assassination, and a claim that a video never said what was claimed by others. A speaker shouts, "You should be registered as a fucking foreign agent" and denounces evangelical support for Israel, declaring "The Christian's days of defending Israel, they fucking gone," followed by insults and expulsion rhetoric.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you guys were like me and you guys were, like, so adamant that Trump was the good guy and Trump was gonna save America. I mean, look at this. I got this guy's autographed picture. I got The USA autographed Trump boots from when Trump got assassinated at the rally. I joined LFA TV. I was probably one of most pro MAGA, ultra MAGA Trump supporters, diehard Trump supporters. I literally gave up three YouTube channels that were doing 30,000,000 views a month so I could put out pro Trump content and try to help wake up the masses. I literally gave away everything to help put this man in the office. And then I don't know if you've noticed, but over, like, the last year, the last eight months since this man got into office, a lot of times everybody's saying, oh, it's just a campaign. Trump just has to say these things. He just has to play along because once he gets into power, then everything's gonna change. Well, he's gotten into power and nothing's changed. And now he's talking about going to war with China. Well, my man over here at Red Pill Syrian had a good base take from what the Chinese think of god's chosen people. Check this one out. Speaker 1: I believe in racial holy war and the total extermination of the Jews. I'm a national socialist. I'm a raholist. Speaker 2: A what? Where are you from originally? Speaker 1: China. You're Jewsy. Speaker 2: Yes. Or like you guys say, the Jews, the j o o s. So you basically believe in the extermination of the Jews? Speaker 1: Yes. Correct. Okay. Total extermination. I could I suggest that Jews are are humanoid viruses. They've exterminated for humankind. What the Goyim did against Jews are not crime. That's called resistance. Speaker 2: Basically, someone like you, I need to find and do something with you because you're a threat over my people. Speaker 0: You're gonna get bimbos like this coming in here and trying to convince you that Candace Owens is the woke riot, and she's trying to get a mistrial to char for Charlie Kirk's assassin even though he's he's he's admitted to it. Speaker 3: TikTok and that make it an Israeli weapon. I was in that meeting. I posted the video. The video that you played was my video. If you watch the video for yourself, he never said that. I was asking Phoebe about what do we do in the wake of Charlie's Charlie Kirk's assassination and the rise of the woke right with people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson creating chaos online even with things like Tyler Robinson saying that he wasn't the assassin when he's confessed to it, trying to get a mistrial for him and not get justice for Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: Bitch, you are a fucking foreign agent. Speaker 3: Which was actually my first published paper, was how you and the Likud party are cut from the same ideological cloth as Trump and the GOP in America. And so specifically with Charlie Kirk's assassination, who was a big mentor of mine, he's my first mentor in this space, evangelicals, from all my research, evangelicals are the reason that Israel has been supported in public sphere outside of the Jews. So with Charlie's assassination and with the kind of trajectory that we see with, like, Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, I guess I'm curious about what's another game plan if we lose evangelical support for the state of Israel. What's our backup plan to be strong, like, outside of the diaspora? Speaker 0: You should be registered as a fucking foreign agent. You are a propaganda mouthpiece for a foreign nation. Jerk was your fucking role model, bitch. They fucking assassinated Charlie Kirk. What the fuck are you talking about? What fucking world and what reality do we live in as an American citizen? Do you think we're gonna sit here and get lectured by some 22 year old with a cute face and nice tits, and the only reason you have any relevance is because every dude most likely wants to fuck you. And we're gonna sit here and you lecture Americans and evangelical Christians on how we're gonna come and fucking defend Israel. The Christian's days of defending Israel, they fucking gone. News flash, sweetheart, they are never coming back. And you're on a fucking sinking ship, and you should be registered as a fucking foreign agent. Get the fuck out of our country. How about that? You wanna go fucking rally the troops for fucking Israel? How about you get the fuck out, go serve in the IDF, go suck some Jew dick. I don't give a fuck what you do, but don't fucking lecture me.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Please follow @MazeLove14 https://t.co/UMer5a2sTG

@MazeLove14 - Maze Love

Wow! Candace Owens puts the “higher up Turning Point USA executives” on blast! She challenges them to publicly release a statement about her explosive statements regarding Charlie Kirk’s position on Israel! “About 48 hours prior to his death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA, Jewish Donors and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause out right” Listen to her whole statement below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I’m going to state this, and I’m going to challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? Just forty eight hours later, a bullet to the throat. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. The truth is going to win.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't high hide it. You don't try to obfuscate it. You don't try to say, well, wait until wait until the memorial events before we start looking into who murdered him. You tell the truth, and you tell it immediately. And I don't think they're capable of doing that. And I have an idea as to why that is. I think the same people that were pressuring Charlie are pressuring them. In fact, I know that for a fact. So they might need my help. Okay? I'm gonna state this, and I'm gonna challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Okay? Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did can you guys answer? Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our on stage reunion could happen? It's a yes or a no. Okay? Let's stop this ditching. Let's stop the dodging. Let's, like, explicitly, I wanna hear from Turning Point USA that I'm lying about that. I want you to say no. No. It was just you know, he was feeling a little bit of pressure. No. I want you to literally answer what I have just said. It either happened or it didn't. I'm either making it all up or it happened exactly as I'm saying. And while we're at it, may I ask, what is the name of the Jewish donor who sponsored the Hamptons weekend? Okay? And to pastor Rob McCoy, were there any LLCs that you or your son were being paid through that sat outside of Turning Point. I'm asking that question genuinely. Yeah. I'm putting the fire here right at the feet of Turning Point because I am disgusted. I am genuinely disgusted. I am looking around and wondering whether Charlie's entire life was the Truman Show. None of you guys are behaving in the way that you should be behaving. Okay? There is no way you are letting these lies fly unless, as I am hearing, unless it is true that there was a big, big, big payday that was on the line. And if Charlie radically stated that he was done with Israel, if if Charlie said he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause because of, and I quote, Jewish donors, the behavior of Jewish donors, if he said that, yes or no, well, then I don't know. Maybe maybe some people didn't wanna take that risk that he was kinda what? Become Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at Turning Point USA with all of those presences so much presence across college campuses. Maybe they didn't wanna take a chance. You see, I'm just one person, so it's easy to just try to cancel my life and lie on me every second of every day. But Turning Point USA, I think, got a little bit bigger than Charlie, and I'm no longer gonna allow this lie in this narrative. So answer the questions, yes or no. And I'm going to, again, challenge you to lie. And if you do lie, I'm gonna expose the lies, and I'm gonna start dropping videos, actually. So that's where I'm at. Enough of the games. Enough with trying to allow Israel to wrangle a narrative that you know is not true. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. In fact, the friends of Israel were pressuring him really badly, and he was done. And he finally stood up for himself. And I'm proud of that. And I will say this, you know what? Somewhere Charlie is watching. Okay? And I hope he knows that we are reunited. Okay? We're on stage right now, and the Jewish donors are very angry about it. Extremely angry about it. But it feels good to know that in the end, truth is going to win. So accept my challenge or don't.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Now I really want to hear what Erika Kirk has to say about this one. She is now the CEO of TPUSA. https://t.co/4vJg752nMO

Video Transcript AI Summary
'Congratulations, Erica Fransbee.' The speaker questions, 'How did a 17 year old team up with the United States Marine Corps on an international nonprofit no tax filings operation?' and states, 'It's shocking, and we need to look at her mother.' The remarks portray Erica Fransbee's involvement as extraordinary and suggest scrutiny of the related family background. The overall tone emphasizes astonishment and raises questions about the partnership with the United States Marine Corps on a global nonprofit operation described as having no tax filings, while pointing to the mother as a subject for further examination. The excerpt focuses on reactions to Erica Fransbee's involvement with the Marine Corps and calls for examination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congratulations, Erica Fransbee. How did a 17 year old team up with the United States Marine Corps on an international nonprofit no tax filings operation? It's shocking, and we need to look at her mother.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@pa49932 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Lets go KP!

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@GravellMichael @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm I am such a big fan of Candace. Everyone was hating on here for so long. I never jumped on that bandwagon. She's been a G and held it down when it comes to the truth.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@VinayAwast7140 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Didn't the last six school shootings take place by some trans people?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@VinayAwast7140 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm hahah Dont they throw shoes ate each out and shit haha

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Christi40474753 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Thanks, brother. Appreciate the feedback. Wish you the best. God Bless.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@SStarroots @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm You got that right, brother. Next comes the collapse of the US dollar. It ain't gonna be pretty.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Xennial1980 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm You and me both. Candace has been bringing the heat.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@vforJb1984 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm She has the proof. That is why she called out TPUSA. Now they have to make a public Statement. Once they do, and she presents the proof. Then we have the person trying to cover this up.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@EdKennMO @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm I sure will my friend.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@prater3411 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm I am not following you. Can you say that again?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@LiquidSyphon @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Make it a double shot!

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@james25503623 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Thanks Brother. I am stoked to have you in the squad.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@james25503623 @MazeLove14 @IanCarrollShow @ShadowofEzra @TheIntelSCIF @5149jamesli @NicoDelgadoAZ @xIsraelExposedx @BasedSamParker @Truthtellerftm Candace isn't playing. They assassinated her ride or die homie. Now we hear Kirk wanted to bring her back to TPUSA. That has to piss her off even more.

Saved - September 29, 2025 at 10:07 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

These distractions are not big enough, the propaganda is not working, and every day more and more people are waking up. Whatever comes next is going to be massive. https://t.co/0kVRYKxAQo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker predicts distractions to pull focus from Charlie Kirk will accelerate, with events like “I’m talking school shootings. I’m talking buildings getting lit on fire.” He says the right and left will unite for a “moral victory,” citing the Epstein list and asking, “what the hell happened to Charlie Kirk.” He notes, “Kenneth Owens is getting ready to drop some major alpha on Monday” and accuses “the rotten and corrupt FBI, Cash Patel, and his cover up of the Charlie Kirk assassination.” He mentions Chicago, “There was 10 people shot this weekend,” and argues headlines will fade without a bigger event. He then alleges, “Fauci was sewing dead baby scalps on the back of mice” and says, “This study was funded by a grant, by multiple grants from the NIAID office which is run by doctor Anthony Fauci,” with “Planned Parenthood abortion providers” supplying “aborted baby body parts” for experiments. He ends by asking, “Where's president Trump at?... What religion do you think this bastard is?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I talk about this tweet from Alex Jones and convince you why you shouldn't be outraised about some random church in Michigan being set on fire and a random gunman on the loose when nobody's gonna give two shits about this story in a week. Let me tell you how the next couple weeks are gonna play out. So the ratcheting up of the distractions to stop you from focusing on Charlie Kirk are going to accelerate at a rate that we have never seen before. I'm talking school shootings. I'm talking buildings getting lit on fire. I'm talking shootings. I'm talking public assassinations, like the girl on the bus getting stabbed in the neck. Speaker 1: Bitch your boy up. You come through real tough. I suck your nuts, nigga. I suck your nuts. Speaker 0: Because they are terrified of you having a moral victory. So what is a moral victory? You remember Bud Light? When everybody in America came together and we decided that we're gonna bankrupt Bud Light, and we literally drove the stock down by, like, I don't know, $15,000,000,000 pretty much overnight, that's called a moral victory. And that's what's happening here with the right and the left coming together to stand united. We want the gosh damn Epstein list, and we wanna know what the hell happened to Charlie Kirk. We're not gonna let this story go. And Kenneth Owens is getting ready to drop some major alpha on Monday, and we're gonna blow this story up like you've never seen before. The rotten and corrupt FBI, Cash Patel, and his cover up of the Charlie Kirk assassination, that shit's over. We're done buying the trans suitor slop. We're done tracing chasing these gosh damn conspiracy theories in the next fucking shiny little red object. Oh, blink blink blink. Look over here, America. A church is on fire. People are shot. No shit. Look at Chicago. There was 10 people shot this weekend. Nobody gave a shit. But now magically, 10 people are shot at a church and we're supposed to jump. And I get this is a big fucking deal. Don't get me wrong. But it's always a big deal, and it's gonna nobody's gonna give two shits in a week. So what I'm trying to say is the level of chaos that's going to come, they are going to need an another hurricane Helene. That's what's going to be coming because they need something so massive that it it can't take headlines for a day. Right? Because what that's Alex Jones is gonna do here at this story. Maybe we get two or three days of headlines out of it. They catch the shooter. Oh, wow. Big deal. That's not gonna take away the distraction from the Charlie Kirk. They need this story to go cold for about a week to two weeks, and they need something so big that it's gonna take those headlines, like a Maui fire or something that big to kinda bury this and let the dust settle so people kinda put their heads back in the sand and just go, yeah, whatever happened to that Charlie Kirk investigation. That's how it happens every gosh damn time. Now let me show you what else I wanna show you. What America gosh damn voted for. We voted for accountability. So do you guys remember this video? You guys probably didn't. The mainstream media didn't give two shits about this, and two weeks later, nobody cared about it. Fauci was sewing dead baby scalps on the back of mice. Taxpayers were funding it. The tissues had to be alive for the taxpayer experiments to begin with. So the bigger question is, where is Fauci getting dead babies from? Were these babies aborted on purpose for these horrific experiments that the taxpayers had no idea they were funding? Speaker 1: Where they were taking the scalps of five month old aborted babies, and they were grafting them onto lab rats and lab mice to see how much longer they could keep them growing for, and you can actually see the photographs in the published study of little baby scalps grafted onto the backs of lab rats growing little baby hairs. Those would have been the little hairs growing on the heads of little infants in Pittsburgh if they hadn't been killed by abortion and then stitched on the lab rats for experimentation. This study was funded by a grant, by multiple grants from the NIAID office which is run by doctor Anthony Fauci. And when I was undercover, Planned Parenthood abortion providers told me that they were the ones who were supplying the aborted baby body parts for experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. Speaker 0: This story is so freaking sick, and this is what I'm talking about. We voted for gosh damn accountability. And where's president Trump at? Oh, yeah. He's wining and dining, Bill Gates. So do you really think that Fauci, Bill Gates' boy, another, It's always them every single gosh damn time. What religion do you think this bastard is?

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Twelve TikTok accounts, three YouTube channels demonetized, three Instgram accounts got nuked, permanently banned from LinkedIn, and they still can’t shut me up! https://t.co/vifvFuzxOs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the microphone is too big and vows to bring more voices to amplify Americans worried about being priced out of homeownership. He rails against costs—gas, car maintenance, 401(k) withdrawals, and college expenses—and says he voted for cheap gas, accountability, and mean tweets, but got none. He predicts AI will replace about 90% of jobs. He’s traveled to about 20 countries and would pick Australia, France, or Spain over the U.S.; argues many nations have rotten governments and pay-to-play dynamics. He claims a whistleblower provided a hard drive with offshore accounts tied to a former Guatemalan ambassador and other officials, alleging corruption and protection by people in the White House, and that he gave it to the FBI. He discusses US aid, cartel smuggling, and migrant child trafficking; says Trump claimed things were shut down but they weren’t; calls for accountability and political arrests.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm just gonna say this. I think they fucked up, and they gave me too big of a microphone. And I'm gonna go out of my way to bring up as many fucking people as I can possible with me to make their voices bigger. I want people that have zero fucks left in the tank. People that are looking at America and going, you know what? My fucking son, my daughter, they're gonna be priced out of buying real estate for all of eternity. If I don't buy them a home right now, I'm never gonna be able to buy them a home. Oh, maybe I I hope I can afford to pay for my son's Uber rides to and from fucking college because I can't afford to buy him a car. I definitely can afford to pay insurance. And hell, the car that I got, if it breaks down one more time, I'm not gonna be able to fix it. I'm already tapping into my four zero one k to keep my head above water. I voted for cheap gas. I voted for mean tweets, and I voted for gosh damn accountability, and we've gotten absolutely none of the sort. Just keep your keep your mouth shut. Keep your head down. Don't don't don't point out the narrative. Quit noticing. You know, people like Benny Johnson, like, we give a shit where AOC went to school or we give a shit about any of these political talking points. Don't we give a shit about? It's being able to afford a single family home. What I care about is not having to go get indoctrinated for four years just to get a college degree to qualify to have a job that you could teach me to do in a gosh damn week. And then now we have AI that's going to replace about 90% of jobs. And I've been to 20 different countries in the last forty weeks, and there's only been three. Australia, France, and Spain that I wouldn't choose over America. As in, I think each one of every single country, 17 different countries, and I'm talking about third world hell holes where the government is so rotted to the core, the citizens literally are suffering in anguish. I would choose to go start a business in that country because there's more opportunity and I understand how the landscape works. It's a pay to play scheme. And if you can afford to play or to pay, you can afford to play. Mexico, same It's thing. Routed to the gosh damn core, but you wanna know what happens when I wanna document? I don't have to FOIA anything. I just have to find somebody that's corrupt enough to sell it to me, and that's not too gosh damn hard. I went to fuck I went to Guatemala and met with the attorney general where I'm given by whistleblower a hard drive, a thumb drive, that has the offshore bank accounts of Todd Robinson. And not just Todd Robinson, he was an ambassador to Guatemala, but also about 15 corrupt government employees that were used to be involved in the Guatemalan government who have now fled, which have warrants out for their arrest. They're hiding and being protected by the people in our White House, or at least they were in the Kamala White House. And I've given that information to the FBI and this bastard's still walking free after there's allegations that he was throwing Diddy style freak offs at his mansions in Guatemala, where a 12 year old boy was sodomized so bad that he had to be hospitalized. And I give this information when it's people like me, Cappy, Ian Carroll, Zacandas Zones that are out here risking our lives. Literally, I'm traveling to 20 different countries to show you USAID isn't shut down. I'm getting smuggled into I'm getting smuggled into Mexico by the Mexican or Guatemala by the Mexican cartels and, gosh, damn, water rafts. So I can go document and film, o m I, which was one of the number one conduits for this migrant invasion, specifically the trafficking of a 190,000 migrant children out of Guatemala. And we go there to show you, hey, Trump's saying the shit's shut down. It ain't shut down. They're firing and operating on all cylinders. So what the hell are we talking about here? We haven't got mass deport deportations. We haven't got political arrest. We haven't got gosh damn accountability. Gas is at an all time high, at least where I'm at anyways. Nothing's gotten cheaper except for gosh damn eggs. But I'm not gonna shut the fuck up. And I'm gonna keep saying the shit that all Americans are thinking. When are we fucking gonna get some gosh damn accountability? Period. When are we gonna see political arrest? I don't wanna hear another fucking word out of Benny Johnson or any of these faggots about fascist. Fuck you, fascist, and fuck you, faggots.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If you are just now starting to notice how much power a foreign nation has over America, you can thank legends like Isaac Kappy. Just like Seth Rich and Charlie Kirk, he paid the ultimate price for exposing the truth. https://t.co/uVZNFRAE9O

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 promotes accounts, highlighting Isaiah's Army and Isaiah Capi, saying "watch these videos" and "I'll be on his podcast on Wednesday" as they promise "we're gonna go deep down a lot of rabbit holes, including the Charlie Kirk assassination." Speaker 1: "Gabe Hoffman is running ops on people. He is a he is a bad guy, dudes." "These people are bad... They're fucking evil. They're unregistered foreign agents." Isaiah warns: "there is some demonic forces, and I'm talking pure evil" and asks, "Who's behind the porn agenda? Who's behind the LGBTQ agenda? Who's behind the taking away your freedom of speech agenda?" He asserts TikTok was sold to "an Israeli ally" and cites "Larry Ellverson or Iverson" as "the richest man in the fucking world" using it as "an Israeli first propaganda tool to try to brainwash the youth back into supporting Israel." He laments censorship, "they're buying TikTok," and vows to promote smaller accounts, adding, "when they nuke me, we're gonna have an army to come right back up in." "God bless you guys."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys are new to this and kinda just waking up like I've been over the last couple years. I wanna show and promote quite a few accounts. So today is gonna mainly focus on promoting all the amazing accounts that I've started to follow. And one of my favorites is Isaiah's Army. So if you guys haven't heard of the work from Isaiah Capi and what he was warning us about, swing over and just watch these videos. I'm about to drop a low. But then swing over and follow Isaiah's army, and then come check out the show. I'll be on his podcast on Wednesday. We're gonna go deep down a lot of rabbit holes, including the Charlie Kirk assassination. And what we're gonna uncover is gonna absolutely blow your mind, but just wanna give you a little taste of what Isaiah was saying right before they murdered him. Check this out. Speaker 1: Jack Posobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is running ops on people. He is a he is a bad guy, dudes. I look like I've seen a ghost. Yeah. I have. And someone that was very close to me. I'm pretty sure they were just there to infiltrate me. These are really fucking bad people, and I'm beyond pissed. I I don't even know how to describe the feeling inside of me. It's bad. It's bad, guys. These people are bad. They tried to set they tried to set someone up that you know and love. They're fucking evil. These people are evil. These people are evil. They're unregistered foreign agents. Speaker 0: Isaiah was right, guys. If you guys aren't seeing the writing on the walls, there is some demonic forces, and I'm talking pure evil. Who's behind the porn agenda? Who's behind the LGBTQ agenda? Who's behind the taking away your freedom of speech agenda? Who forced who forced TikTok, a Chinese company, to get sold to an Israeli ally, a man who's literally donated billions of dollars to the I IDF and is now Larry Ellverson or Iverson is now the richest man in the fucking world, and he's taking over TikTok so that they can use it as an Israeli first propaganda tool to try to brainwash the youth back into supporting Israel. How about you just stop killing women and children, you psychopaths? And maybe we might give you a break. But these bastards, anybody that's going over there and bending over and kissing that wall, any influencer that's flying over to Israel, they are your enemy. And if you can't see that with the cover up of the assassination of Charlie Kirk from the Benny Johnsons to the fucking Nick Sorters to everybody Scott Presslers, all of them, they're supposed to be Charlie Kirk's homie. And if this was any other situation and the signs were to point to Mohammed or fucking Iraq or Afghanistan or some the Muslim brotherhood, do you really think Benny Johnson would be just keeping his mouth shut trying to distract you and convince you that there's this trans shooter narrative? How about Jack Posobic? You guys remember us calling out Jack Posobic yesterday? Yeah. I think there's a lot more to this gosh damn story, and that's why you're getting censored, that's why they're buying TikTok. And that's why they're gonna do everything they can to silence you and silence me. So I'm gonna do everything I can to promote as many smaller accounts. That way, so when they nuke me, we're gonna have an army to come right back up in. God bless you guys.
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 8:18 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Did every conspiracy theory throughout history have this many coincidences or is the Charlie Kirk assassination different? https://t.co/7QKAkm48YK

Video Transcript AI Summary
thirteen years ago, Emerson Drive put out a video for a song called She's My Kind of Crazy. The actress in the video is Erica Kirk before she ever met Charlie. In the video, she zip lines on Fairmount with Tyler from the band. In the video. And in the background, they show Tyler with the numbers nine ten behind him, and Erica has ten ten behind her with an American flag. Tyler Robinson is the supposed shooter. Okay. Now let's check out these check out these photos. This is Erica Kirk, and this is Tyler. It's gonna get weirder. This is behind them on the Vegas Strip 910 And 1010. And then here is the video, she's my kinda crazy official music video by Emerson Drive. So you're telling me there's a chance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Just when you thought the simulation, the conspiracy theories couldn't get any more crazy after snake eyes, well, let's just say our buddy Chris Truck Cyber, I believe, Cybertruck Chris, just sent me some shit that's fucking crazy. Check this out. So in this message from Chris, he says thirteen years ago, Emerson Drive put out a video for a song called She's My Kind of Crazy. The actress in the video is Erica Kirk before she ever met Charlie. In the video, she zip lines on Fairmount with Tyler from the band. In the video. And in the background, they show Tyler with the numbers nine ten behind him, and Erica has ten ten behind her with an American flag. Tyler Robinson is the supposed shooter. What are the chances? Okay. Now let's check out these check out these photos. Okay. This is Erica Kirk, and this is Tyler. Okay. It's gonna get weirder. This is behind them on the Vegas Strip 910 And 1010. And then here is the video, she's my kinda crazy official music video by Emerson Drive. So you're telling me there's a chance.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

I want every American to pay attention to the social media accounts who are still pushing the “Tyler Robinson was a loan gunman on a roof who shot the magic bullet theory” https://t.co/TB2GZ4paV9

Video Transcript AI Summary
You guys wanna know why I'm the most censored documentary filmmaker in America and why it's taking me so long to roughly get to 260,000 and get to a point where our Twitter spaces can get 5,000 people and pack a house? It's because of dickwads like Jack Posobic. This this trans shooter narrative shit is gonna be career ending for these psychopaths. "I saw a leftist murder Charlie Kirk, and then I saw them celebrate it." No matter how many times you repeat, I saw a leftist murder Charlie Kirk, the more time that you're gonna hear voices like me saying fuck you. Your trans shooter narrative's fallen to fucking par. And don't even get me started on what Candace is about to drop this week. This is why your engagement sucks more dick than Dolan Mulvaney at a CPAC conference. Just saying, Jack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys wanna know why I'm the most censored documentary filmmaker in America and why it's taking me so long to roughly get to 260,000 and get to a point where our Twitter spaces can get 5,000 people and pack a house? It's because of dickwads like Jack Posobic, and this this trans shooter narrative shit is gonna be career ending for these psychopaths. So let me just show you guys what these dickheads are trying k. So he puts out a tweet this morning, and it's only got a 104,000 views. And I can't tell you that's over, like, ten hours. So the engagement on this is absolutely horrible. He said, I saw a leftist murder Charlie Kirk, and then I saw them celebrate it. You know what I saw? I saw a media try to push a narrative about a lone shooter on the roof with a gun and a man that walked down neighborhoods and changed outfits and then came back with a gun down his pants and was limping because he was carrying the gun down his pants. Then we were told that he got on the roof, assembled the rifle, changed his outfit, took the shot, got got done, cleaned up his shit, changed back the rifle, disassembled the rifle, put it back down his pants, jumped off a roof. Then we're told that he's in a Discord, then we're told that he's not in a Discord because the CEO of Discord comes out and tells us he's not in a Discord. And then we're seeing every single angle from this shot, and none of it makes sense. None of it lines up. And then we're being told that this man is somehow in a full sprint on the roof of the rifle within three seconds. And then we have this flurry of conspiracy theories, and then we also don't even get me started on the fucking patties. And don't even get me started on what Candace is about to drop this week. So all of this big shit that you're trying to push, Jack, and we know what you're doing. And it's gonna be career ending for anybody in the MAGA the fake MAGA media from Benny Johnson to Nick Sorter to fucking Zach Guenthermann or Zach Ingleman, whoever the kid Cullen Rug, all of them. They're all getting exposed to Laura Loomers because we ain't letting this Charlie Kirk investigation go, Jack Pesowic. No matter how many times you repeat, I saw a leftist murder Charlie Kirk, the more time that you're gonna hear voices like me saying fuck you, and you're gonna hear people like me not afraid to call it out. And our voices are getting louder and yours is obviously getting smaller, Jack. So TikTok motherfucker. How much longer can you guys carry this weight for this administration and cover up the assassination of Charlie Kirk? He was supposed to be your buddy, you dirtbags. He was supposed to be your friend. You were supposed to be the ones fucking protecting him. And now he's dead. Your trans shooter narrative's fallen to fucking par. This is why your engagement sucks more dick than Dolan Mulvaney at a CPAC conference. Just saying, Jack.
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 6:01 AM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Ian Carroll explained what every American should do if they ever find themselves front and center at an assassination or a false flag terrorist attack. https://t.co/MTIEqqpHMl

Video Transcript AI Summary
From Ian Carroll’s Twitter-space: "if you are at one of these events... it is almost your obligation as an American citizen to immediately pull your phone out and start recording." We can no longer trust the media, he says, praising a one-hour livestream as "an absolute hero" and suggesting that "every single person at the event started recording" would have provided more evidence. He urges downloading original footage in four k 60fps, noting "the more eyeballs filming in four k." He claims "The FBI is hiding something" and that "the narrative" is not trusted, recalling that "the media was... crickets" fourteen days after the Trump assassination. He cites growth—"5,000 people" in the next space and "36,000 tuned in"—and elevates voices like "Ian Malcombs, the Ian Carrolls, the Myron Gaines" as truth tellers; "JQ Radio" waking everybody up. He adds, "the Jews have an unproportionately or disproportionate amount of power"... Today is the twenty seventh; Charlie Kirk was shot on the tenth—seventeen days ago; "Tyler Robinson doesn't look like our shooter."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna go over a couple key points that were made by Ian Carroll in tonight's Twitter space, but I wanted to start off by telling everybody how much I appreciate you guys from the bottom of my heart, all of the new followers, all of the new subscribers, everybody that's been following our work. I think we've been pretty spot on and focused on keeping a level head and just digging into the facts about what we know about this assassination of Charlie Kirk, and it reeks of a cover up. So that takes us to my main point here is Ian Carroll made this point in tonight's space, and I wanna kinda you know, I wanna add a little bit to that. So Ian said, you know, if you are at one of these events and anything like this happens again in the future, it is almost your obligation as an American citizen to immediately pull your phone out and start recording. We can no longer trust the media, and we've seen how valuable that one hour livestream with that gentleman that walked around that campus for one hour and filmed everything, that man's an absolute hero. The the ability that Blake's been able to go through this footage and track down this footage, but just imagine, Ian brought this up. He goes, imagine if when that shot was fired immediately after a thousand or 2,000 or every single person at the event immediately pulled their phone out and started recording. And if you see people recording this way, record the other way. You get what I'm saying? Because imagine if there was a thousand cameras at every second, how many people would have been out there looking, catching that kid on camera? And then take it a step further, how many of those interviews did that gentleman do in that one hour livestream that are just so critical? Because he stops, he's stationary, he's talking to somebody, and we're able to watch the people in the background. We're seeing how people are acting. We're seeing suspicious people. A lot of things don't add up with this. All the only thing that we're very confident in, Azan, is that man was running on top of the Low C Building within three seconds of the shot being fired. And we are very confident that the FBI is hiding something based off of all the lies that they've told us already. So nobody believes the narrative. Nobody trusts the FBI. And how much more evidence would we have if everybody would have been filming? Now let's take this a step further. And if you weren't on the campus and you were like me who was just leaving the event, who happened to be at the airport talking to his dad literally minutes after this happened and his dad doesn't have Twitter, what was I doing? I was downloading all of the original footage. So when you see these videos get posted on X and they're an original video, and you can tell if it's crystal clear, the incident just happened, three minutes later somebody's putting up a video that you've never seen before, high probability that that's one of the originals. Rip it. Download it to your device. If you have to screen record it, that's okay. It's better than nothing, but it's still not gonna be as good as if you were able to download those. Because we see how this event played out and you're kinda looking at an old video of an old video of an old video, and it's been rendered and downloaded and people put text on it and cropped it and recropped it and zoomed in and zoomed in and zoomed in. The next thing you know, you're zoomed in like this and you can't even tell what the face looks like because it's all just been blurred by the algorithms and compressed and compressed and compressed. So I think those are some really good points to remember. The more eyeballs, the more iPhone 16 Pro Max's we have out there filming in four k. Another point, film in four k. If you have the space, in four k 60 frames per second. That way, especially if you're hearing these people speak and you're looking around and you're going, you know what? Something doesn't feel right here. You now should be speaking up. Right? If you show up to an event, you're looking around and there's a famous person like Charlie Kirk or like Ian Carroll or Acanis Owens, and they're speaking in a courtyard and you're looking around and going, wow. There could be a shooter in any one of these buildings, and I don't see a cop. It's probably in your best interest to just take a step back, try to go get behind those buildings, and actually do a do a do a scan of the area yourself because, obviously, the security teams aren't doing it. The secret service may be in on it, the FBI, these private security firms. If you have an Israeli security firm or if you have anybody connected to Israel in any way shape or form connected to your security detail, you should probably immediately fire them. Okay. So today is the twenty seventh. Charlie Kirk was shot on the tenth. That's seventeen days ago. Do you guys remember what the media was like fourteen days after the Trump assassination? It was crickets. It was almost nonexistent. You had John Cullen and a few other people there that were still chasing down rabbit rabbit holes. But the rest of us pretty much were like, well, we're not gonna get any more evidence. The FBI's covering this shit up. We don't know what the hell is going on. This reeks like shit. Now here we are again, but this time is different. We're seventeen days in, and we just hit 5,000 people in the next space that came there specifically to talk about the Charlie Kirk investigation because none of us are believing that narrative. And what does that mean? By the end of that space, there was 36,000 people that tuned in. Those are really big numbers. That gives us the ability. That means next time or whenever the next event happens and these things go down, the voices that have been censored and silenced and pretty much shadow banned off every other space, or if they do get a mic, they're attacked by a panel of four or five Democrats or four or five Israel first commies or you know who guys. So these people, the truth tellers, the Ian Malcombs, the Ian Carrolls, the Myron Gaines. These are the voices that you really want kinda dissecting these things because we're not afraid to go and throw some conspiracy theories out there. We're not we're not afraid to question and ask the questions. Right? And that's what JQ Radio is all about. Wolf and those boys over there, what they did for humanity, waking everybody up in the JQ spaces that they put together. I mean, that was the building blocks, I think, for a lot of us. That was where we got our that's where our eyes got opened. That's where we came to the realization that it's okay to say the word Jew. It's okay to notice. It's okay to point out fact that the Jews have an unproportionately or disproportionate amount of power first off based off the fact that they only make up what point 2% of the population in our country or even if it's 3% of the population in our country. They represent they control about ninety ninety seven percent of our government. How is that happening? And you're and you shouldn't be feeling ashamed of yourself to ask those questions. Because if it was somebody that was from Iraq or Afghanistan or they were Muslim, you know, it would be the exact opposite. Look. Just look at Laura Loomer. I mean, the girls lost all credibility, and now she's starting to tell us that there's some jihadists, some men in a cave from Afghanistan are gonna swumble across our border, and they're gonna somehow assemble weapons. They're gonna carry out this mass terrorist attack. And you mean tell me our FBI with all those resources, the CIA, all that intel, that you can't tell me that they can't find this sleeper cell, this sophisticated sleeper cell that carried out nine eleven? Guys, America's falling apart. Nobody has to attack us. All they have to do is just sit back and watch or leak the Epstein list. That would be pretty catastrophic. But this story is not going away. We're not letting them cover this one up. It stings like shit. Tyler Robinson doesn't look like our shooter. We can't find one video, one photo, not a grain of evidence that shows that Tyler Robinson was at this university. None whatsoever. And now his whole parents narrative, it's all going to shit. And I'm just so proud to be part of this with you guys and be able to have our voices and give a voice to the voiceless. If you guys watch my content, you know that I give more credit and I cite more people on x, and I try to promote more small accounts than any other big name you see on x. There's not a single person who gives more credit and promotes more smaller accounts than I do. Why is that? Because I am highly incentivized for you to get 5,000, 10,000, or a 100,000 followers. Why is that? Because you're following me. So if I can build your voice up when it comes time for me to break stories, I now have a little army of people that are below me that are all fighting the good fight. And that's why I promote so many these pages. And I promote some people that I shouldn't and I probably wish I didn't. We all make mistakes and we can't be perfect. But at the time, I tried to say, hey. Right now, at least since I started following them, these people are putting out great content. I've made some mistakes, guys. I did fucking I was a huge fan of Laura Loomer at one point. You know? I'm just waking up. Give me a break. God bless.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

https://t.co/i4gYl7QIgA

Saved - September 26, 2025 at 4:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have 100% proof that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a foreign intelligence agency, and it wasn't a gunshot. Huge thanks to Black Bednarz for breaking this story! I hope Charlie isn’t another JFK. This is the biggest discovery yet, and the reactions are intense.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

We know have 100% proof that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a foreign intelligence agency. We know know he wasn’t shot with a gun. Special thanks Black Bednarz for breaking this massive story! https://t.co/35bpOY1FcC

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is the biggest story, the biggest breakthrough in the Charlie Kirk investigation. Blake Bednarz—Blake, b l a k e b e d n a r z—purchased original content from people at this event. "This device that was on his chest was the explosive device. You can see the round. You can see the compression." This video is now confirmed. This right here blows this entire investigation wide open. "You can't look at that and tell me there is not an explosive device, some type of round, something goes off under his neck." "Tyler Robinson is a patsy. This was an inside job." "Kash Patel and our FBI is literally covering up the assassination of Carly Kirk." "Please make this the most viral video on x by tomorrow morning."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna be very clear on this, guys. This is the biggest story, the biggest breakthrough in the Charlie Kirk investigation. Blake Bednarz. Blake, b l a k e b e d n a r z. You guys need to follow this guy. He's broke two massive stories. So he just purchased some original content from some people at this event. And I wanna show you. I want you to watch this video. It's now confirmed. This device that was on his chest was the explosive device. Look at that. You can see the round. You can see the compression. So remember when his his necklace just blows off over his ear? And we're like, oh, yeah. It had to have been a side shot because it snaps the necklace and it blows off. And I was thinking, it hit the it went through his neck and purged out the back of his neck and it snapped the necklace off, but it didn't make sense. Why how would you break the last the latch in the front? Because that thing went flying off backwards. So you'd have to literally break the latch in the front somewhere in here for the necklace to be go behind you. If the bullet went through your neck and it's and it broke the back of it, your necklace would have just fallen down. It would have never ever flown off that way. So want I you to watch this video, and then I'm gonna play the necklace one after this. Check this out. Speaker 1: In America over the last ten years. Speaker 2: Stay down. Outsinger not counting gang violence. Speaker 1: Great. In America over the last ten years. Speaker 2: Stay down. Outsinger not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 1: In America over the last ten years. Speaker 2: Stay down. Houndsinger not counting gang violence. Speaker 1: In America over the last Speaker 0: I mean, guys, this right here blows this entire investigation wide open. You can't look at that and tell me there is not an explosive device, some type of round, something goes off under his neck, and you can see it almost was a direct everybody who called this out and said that this was the device, we all just called them crazy. This was it. Tyler Robinson is a patsy. This was an inside job. This is a massage hit just like their gosh damn pagers. Now we know. Let's talk about what? Oh, yeah. Let's talk about the necklace. Now let's watch this necklace fly off the back of his neck. Check this video out. Speaker 2: Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 0: You're great. I can't believe this is actually happening. I can't believe we are actually getting definitive evidence that Kash Patel and our FBI is literally covering up the assassination of Carly Kirk. Please make this the most viral video on x by tomorrow morning. God bless you guys. Share the crap out of this.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

please follow @BlakeBednarz

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@TheEnglishTim I hope Charlie isn’t another JFK

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@GenXGirl1994 Yes he sure has.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@Red_Pill_US Yeah what the hell is this. @Red_Pill_US has been on fire. 🔥

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@BraedenSorbo Yeah dude this is the biggest discovery yet.

View Full Interactive Feed