TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SNewmanPodcast

Saved - August 10, 2025 at 9:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the next decade, driving your own car may become nearly illegal, with governments implementing restrictions starting this year. Kerry Lutz, who has tested Tesla’s self-driving for three years, notes it now drives him 95% of the time and improves rapidly. By 2035, manual driving could face legal and social pressures similar to smoking, with urban areas banning human drivers. This shift threatens millions of driving jobs and represents a significant loss of personal freedom, as governments prepare to enforce these changes under the guise of safety.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

In 10 years, driving your own car will be almost illegal. AI showed exactly how the bans will unfold. The first restrictions start this year. Here's how governments will eliminate your freedom, step by step: https://t.co/MaQvcghdpH

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Kerry Lutz has tested Tesla’s self-driving for 3 years. He says it’s now driving him 95% of the time. And it gets 10–20x better every 6 months. He asked AI how this ends...The answer shocked him: https://t.co/GICkr02jeq

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a Tesla. I got it because it's a cool car. Nothing to do with its green aspirations, which I don't buy into anyways. But in The US, the largest segment of employment in The United States is driver. And the FSD is to the point now, it will be within the next six months, it's gonna eliminate over time all of those jobs. When I asked AI about it, it said in ten years, you will be perceived as a, an insane person for wanting to drive your own car, and you'll be banished. Driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a Tesla. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I got it because it's a cool car. Nothing to do with its green aspirations, which I don't buy into anyways. But in The US, the largest segment of employment in The United States is driver. 10,000,000 people are drivers, whether they're Uber drivers, truck drivers, you know, limo drivers, their drivers, deliveries, Amazon, 10,000,000 people. And the FSD is to the point now, it will be within the next six months, it's gonna eliminate over time all of those jobs. When I asked AI about it, it said in ten years, you will be perceived as a, an insane person for wanting to drive your own car, and you'll be banished. You will, you know, you will be, you know, just ostracized for wanting to drive your own car for what right now is the most normal of behaviors. So driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence. So if it's gonna change that

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

By 2035, manual driving will be treated like smoking. Legal restrictions. Social pressures. Geographic containment. Urban areas will ban human drivers entirely. But here's how they'll convince us to accept it: https://t.co/tqmZQ7YoGU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Manual driving will be treated like smoking. Regulations will stack against you. Urban bans on human driving. Car culture will shrink but not die. Narrative manipulation will play a role. Think about that. So it's for your own good. You know? We're keeping everybody safe. That's why you aren't allowed to drive your car. Of course, they'll be able to restrict your freedom too. Right, Sean? I mean, they'll be able to say where you can go and when you can go there. And it's like, oh, you know, I wanna go take a nice trip with the family and go go past Area 51 and check out Roswell and say, no. Forbidden area. You can't go there. Sorry. And it takes you on another route.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Manual driving will be treated like smoking. Regulations will stack against you. Urban bans on human driving. Car culture will shrink but not die. Narrative manipulation will play a role. Think about that. So it's for your own good. You know? We're keeping everybody safe. That's why you aren't allowed to drive your car. Of course, they'll be able to restrict your freedom too. Right, Sean? I mean, they'll be able to say where you can go and when you can go there. And it's like, oh, you know, I wanna go take a nice trip with the family and go go past Area 51 and check out Roswell and say, no. Forbidden area. You can't go there. Sorry. And it takes you on another route.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Narrative comes first. Media campaigns. Cultural shaming. AI even predicted headlines like: “Why letting Grandpa drive is dangerous.” Parents whisper at pickup. Same playbook from 2020... https://t.co/7lEwgHYqWE

Video Transcript AI Summary
"It's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want." "Here here's what it said narrative manipulation will play a role." "The media will portray manual drivers as dangerous or selfish as they once did with anti maskers." "Expect op eds like, why letting grandpa drive as a threat to public safety, or should you be allowed to drive when AI can do it safer?" The speaker argues that narrative manipulation will shape public opinion by framing human drivers as hazards and selfish actors, drawing a parallel to anti-mask rhetoric. It predicts a wave of opinion pieces challenging who should be allowed to drive as AI technology becomes safer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want. Here here's what it said narrative manipulation will play a role. The media will portray manual drivers as dangerous or selfish as they once did with anti maskers. Expect op eds like, why letting grandpa drive as a threat to public safety, or should you be allowed to drive when AI can do it safer?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Kerry's Tesla drives him 95% of the time. Three years ago, FSD would’ve gotten him killed. Today, it brings him from I-95 to his doorstep. In 6 months, it'll outperform humans in virtually every situation. And once it does, the job loss hits: https://t.co/3F6chPk1yn

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says improvements in full self driving are happening so fast now: over six months, it's probably 10 or 20 times better than it was the prior six months; in another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times. But the only thing is, the only requirement for FSD to be widely adapted is it just has to drive better than humans. I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver. Like, I get onto I 95 here. That's our highway of death in Florida. And I get on there, you know, late at night. Nobody's on the road. Get into the left lane, set it to 85 buck 85 miles an hour, and, you know, it gets me home in twenty five minutes. It it basically brings me to my front doorstep now, except that, the only thing is in my HOA, it has a thing about gates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One thing, and it's happening so quickly. The improvements incremental improvements on the full self driving are happening so fast now. Like, over six months, it's probably 10 or 20 times better than it was the prior six months. In another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times. But the only thing is, the only requirement for FSD to be widely adapted is it just has to drive better than humans. I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver. Like, I get onto I 95 here. That's our highway of death in Florida. And I get on there, you know, late at night. Nobody's on the road. Get into the left lane, set it to 85 buck 85 miles an hour, and, you know, it gets me home in twenty five minutes. It it basically brings me to my front doorstep now, except that, the only thing is in my HOA, it has a thing about gates.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

America has 10 million professional drivers: Truckers. Uber. Delivery. It's their largest employment segment. Once FSD proves safer than humans, those jobs vanish. But the real loss goes deeper:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

"The automobile has always represented freedom," Lutz explained. Go wherever you want, whenever you want. Politicians have hated it from day 1. "It's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want." https://t.co/WEDEelf0Nv

Video Transcript AI Summary
An automobile has really represented freedom. 'Freedom to go wherever the heck you want, whenever you want.' Yeah. And the politicians have hated it from day one. You know? 'It's like it's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want.' Here here's what said narrative manipulation will play a role. The media will portray manual drivers as dangerous or selfish as they once did with anti maskers. Expect op eds like, why letting grandpa drive as a threat to public safety, or should you be allowed to drive when AI can do it safer? Yeah.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you think if all of a sudden you become restricted, what type of world is that that that you know, because, an automobile has really represented freedom. Freedom to go wherever the heck you want, whenever you want. Yeah. And the politicians have hated it from day one. You know? It's like it's too hard to control a population that's free to do whatever they want. Here here's what said narrative manipulation will play a role. The media will portray manual drivers as dangerous or selfish as they once did with anti maskers. Expect op eds like, why letting grandpa drive as a threat to public safety, or should you be allowed to drive when AI can do it safer?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

AI laid it out: Insurance discrimination Urban driving bans Geofencing “unsafe” areas Rerouting “for your safety” You try to take a family road trip and get: “Destination restricted.”

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Lutz shared his I-95 experience: "I set it to 85 mph, and it brings me to my front doorstep." The technology already exists. Governments just need the right moment to mandate it. They're laying the groundwork now... And the same is happening in Canada: https://t.co/OWqkXvztHC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Driving is fundamental to our day to day existence. Over the last three years I've had full self driving. Initially, it would get you killed if you just rely you couldn't rely upon it. Now 95% of the time, that car is driving itself, and I am, I'm just along for the ride. Like, six months, it's probably 10 or 20 times better than it was the prior six months. In another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times. The only requirement for FSD to be widely adopted is it has to drive better than humans. I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence. So if it's gonna change that and I look at how it's changed over the last three years I've been having the full self driving. Initially, it would get you killed if you just rely you couldn't rely upon it. Now 95% of the time, that car is driving itself, and I am, I'm just along for the ride. So that's just one thing, and it's happening so quickly. The improvements incremental improvements on the full self driving are happening so fast now. Like, six months, it's probably 10 or 20 times better than it was the prior six months. In another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times. But the only thing is, the only requirement for FSD to be widely adapted is it just has to drive better than humans. I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver. Like, I get onto I 95 here. That's our highway of death in Florida. And I get on there, you know, late at night. Nobody's on the road. Get into the left lane, set it to $85 85 miles an hour, and, you know, it gets me home in twenty five minutes. It it basically brings me to my front doorstep now, except that, the only thing is in my HOA, it has a thing about gates.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Remember how fast 2020 changed everything? Canada froze bank accounts for supporting truckers. America locked down for "two weeks" that became two years. Governments love taking freedoms. They never give them back.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

AI's timeline says: Within 10 years, wanting to drive manually makes you "an insane person." You'll be ostracized, banned, restricted to special zones. Just like smokers today. The tech excuse makes it unstoppable. https://t.co/1KTjJhaEpB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Driving is fundamental to daily life for most in North America, though some rely on mass transit in inner cities. The speaker cites rapid progress in full self-driving (FSD) over the last three years: 'Initially, it would get you killed if you just rely you couldn't rely upon it.' Now, '95% of the time, that car is driving itself, and I am, I'm just along for the ride.' Improvements are accelerating: 'over six months, it's probably ten or 20 times better than it was the prior six months. In another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times.' The only requirement for FSD to be widely adapted is it just has to drive better than humans. 'I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For what right now is the most normal of behaviors. So driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence. So if it's gonna change that and I look at how it's changed over the last three years I've been having the full self driving. Initially, it would get you killed if you just rely you couldn't rely upon it. Now 95% of the time, that car is driving itself, and I am, I'm just along for the ride. So that's just one thing, and it's happening so quickly. The improvements incremental improvements on the full self driving are happening so fast now. Like, over six months, it's probably ten or 20 times better than it was the prior six months. In another six months, it could be 50 to a 100 times. But the only thing is, the only requirement for FSD to be widely adapted is it just has to drive better than humans. I would argue that it's done that already in many cases, but in the next six months, it'll be in virtually every instance it's better driver.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Think about your last family road trip. The spontaneous detours. The freedom to explore. That kind of freedom has an expiration date. Once it's gone, we'll never get it back.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Video Credit: #886 - Kerry Lutz | Shaun Newman Podcast https://www.youtube.com/live/bSkpwdrxozs?feature=shared

Saved - May 17, 2025 at 2:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A single typo in a postal code led to a Canadian election being decided by just one vote, as Liberal candidate Tatiana Auguste won over Bloc Québécois incumbent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné. A voter’s mail-in ballot was returned due to this error, which Elections Canada confirmed but deemed the result final, citing legal constraints. This incident echoes a similar occurrence in 2021, raising concerns about the integrity of the electoral process. Many Canadians feel the system is rigged due to repeated "errors" that benefit the same party, undermining trust in independent institutions.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

A single typo just flipped a Canadian election. Not because of Russian hackers or voter fraud. But because of THREE digits on an envelope. Here's who *actually* holds the power in Canadian politics:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The riding of Terrebonne, Quebec just experienced something that defies probability (as @vesperdigital points out). After a judicial recount, Liberal candidate Tatiana Auguste won by ONE VOTE over Bloc Québécois incumbent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné. One. Out of 46,703 ballots.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bloc Québécois candidate for the riding of Terrebonne is evaluating her options after losing by a single vote. Following a judicial recount, the vote reversal was described as spectacular and unexpected. The candidate stated she owes it to herself to evaluate all options.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna send it to you. Maybe you wanna put it up on the screen so that everyone who is watching here you go. And I'll let you read. I've talked enough. I love your soapy voice. So Here, this this is what it says. Okay. The title, it's on, CBC, block candidate who lost by one vote considering all options after report of ballot problem. The block Quebec law candidate for the Montreal area writing of Terabon says she evaluating her options after a judicial recount that saw her lose by a single vote. So that one vote quoted following a judicial recount that caused the vote reversal as spectacular as unexpected. I owe it to myself to evaluate all options before us. Nathaniel, no. Natalie. Thank you. Sinclair. This Deganje. Deganje.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

But here's where things get crazy... A Bloc voter named Emmanuelle Bossé had her mail-in ballot RETURNED as undeliverable. Why? Elections Canada printed the wrong postal code on the return envelope. She mailed it on time, BUT it never reached the counting station.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An election candidate is investigating a possible error involving an uncounted or invalid mail-in ballot in the Terrebonne riding. The voter, Emmanuel Gagne, wrote on Facebook that he will keep people updated on the next steps. The voter received an envelope from Elections Canada with an incorrect address label. She mailed in her ballot in early April using the addressed envelope provided by Elections Canada, but it was returned to her as undelivered. Elections Canada says part of the postal code printed on the envelope was wrong and that it's working to gather more facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's it's Quebec. Wow, man. Come on. I don't blame the falsehood for that. Speaker 1: Wrote on Facebook on Monday. I'll keep you updated on the next steps. Singular, Gagne, statement comes as election candidate investigates a possible error involving an uncannered male uncounted male invalid from a block voter in the Terrebonne riding, voter Emmanuel Speaker 0: Now this is now this is the girl that got the envelope. Right? She she she got the envelope from Elections Canada. They stuck. You know that yellow sticker that they put in with your address and everything, blah blah blah, to cover it? They got it wrong. They got her address wrong. She didn't write her address. She just had to fill it in, close it, send it back. Speaker 1: Told so she told RadioCan that she mailed in her ballot in early April using an addressed envelope provided by Elections Canada, but it was returned to her as undelivered. Election Canada says it appears that part of the postal code printed on the envelope was wrong and that it's working to gather more facts Speaker 0: of Speaker 1: what happened.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Just think about this. A national election hinged on 3 wrong digits printed on an envelope sticker. If Emmanuelle's vote had been counted (assuming she voted Bloc), the result would've been a tie. And in a tie? A whole different process kicks in.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tatiana August (Liberal) won over incumbent Sinclair by one vote after a judicial recount. The election returned the Liberals to power with a minority government on April 28. August was initially projected to win by 35 votes, but Sinclair, first elected in 2021, moved ahead by 44 votes after the election. Following the judicial recount, August received 23,352 votes to Sinclair's 23,351. The odds of this result are claimed to be tantamount to a tornado going through a landfill and building a Cessna plane.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Liberal, Tatiana August was declared the winner over Sinclair, the incumbent by a one vote margin after judicial recount in an election that returned the liberals to power with a minority government on April 28. So, basically Speaker 1: Mahola, you you need to jump one paragraph. Just jump one paragraph so people get more context what happened. Speaker 0: To the to the final result? Speaker 1: No. Auguste was initially projected to win. Speaker 0: Okay. Auguste was initially projected to win the riding by 35 votes after Speaker 1: the election. 35 votes. Speaker 0: But but was, but Sinclair, who was first elected in 2021, moved ahead by 44 Speaker 1: votes. So it swung. It went liberal, then it swung block, Speaker 0: continuing. Required post election validation process. The win was returned to August on Saturday following the judicial recount with August receiving 23,352 votes to signal to Sinclair's twenty three thousand three hundred and fifty one. So there's your one vote that separates. Speaker 1: So okay. So I'm laughing because it's so ridiculous. The odds of this happening is tantamount. If you've if you've done one of the things that I I do sometimes in my work is to calculate odds. The odds of this occurring in the way that it did is tantamount to a tornado going through a landfill and building a Cessna plane.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

You'd think with such a bombshell, Elections Canada would scramble to fix this error. Nope. They confirmed the mistake but declared the result FINAL. Their explanation is that the Canada Elections Act doesn't allow appeals after a judicial recount...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a situation where an election result hinged on a single vote, which they find statistically improbable. They mention a previously uncounted vote that was discovered, potentially creating a tie or necessitating a recount. The speaker raises concerns about 800 canceled votes and questions the criteria and oversight involved in rejecting votes. They call for transparency and scrutiny of every rejected vote, suggesting potential errors or biases in the process. The speaker questions Elections Canada and whether they will review every single thing. They express the opinion that winning by one vote in this scenario suggests possible manipulation, implying someone may have arbitrarily decided the outcome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It there's almost that much probability that these series of events have occurred. One to the power of 200 to the square root of, like, eight. Right? That this would all land on one vote. And what makes this even funnier is then this girl pops out of nowhere going, hey. You guys didn't count my vote. So what does that mean? Are they tied? Are they gonna have to redo that writing? Is this now put into question every writing? How many votes did you cancel out? Apparently, they canceled out, like, 800 votes, Sean. Did you know that? I did. Like so hold on. You mean to tell me? Can we see these votes? And, you know, Marty up north brought this and he was completely right on this. Marty was like, we need to see and scrutinize every vote that was rejected. How do we know what you did? What if the person that was doing it is cockeyed and can't see properly? Like, who is deciding all of this? And how did you decide all of this? And it's all secretive. And now this comes out. This begs the question, Elections Canada, are you going to review every single thing? Because I'm sorry, man. This there's no way statistically you can win by one vote. The way that they won by one vote here, Sean, and this is my opinion. Okay? If somebody said, fuck it. Let's just give it one vote, and we're done. Like, let's just give like, morons.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Elections Canada insists this was the ONLY case in the entire election where a ballot was returned due to an incorrect address. One wrong postal code in the entire country? And it just happened to be the one that would've tied a race decided by a single vote?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disbelief that an election could be won by a single vote. They highlight the absurdity of the situation, noting the initial vote count was 44-35 in favor of the liberal party. The speaker finds it bizarre that the election result hinges on one vote. They then mention a woman named Emmanuel, who claims Elections Canada didn't count her vote due to an incorrect address. The speaker questions how, out of all the people in Turbine, Emmanuel, who allegedly voted for the block, was the only one whose vote couldn't be found.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't you give them at least five? Why don't you give them at least 10 more? Don't do one. Like, it's absurd. It's literally absurd at this point that you would win by one vote. This is comedy at this point. So, you're up 44, 30 five, liberal, then you you go down and the block is up 44. Okay, so it's close. But one vote close, And then what adds the cherry on this whole cake is and then this girl, Emmanuel, comes out and says, well, elections Canada didn't count my vote. Because they got the address wrong. Correct? Right. And and and and, again, it's it's it's it's how bizarre. Right? Let's not make this bigger than this. It's how bizarre this whole thing is. You mean to tell me that the the the the win was based on one vote, And you're telling me you couldn't find out of all of Turbine except Emmanuel who voted for the block.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

What makes this even crazier is this ISN'T the first time. In 2021, another Quebec riding (Châteauguay-Lacolle) saw the Liberal candidate win by ONE VOTE after a recount. A voter's mail-in ballot was returned due to—you guessed it—a wrong postal code.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The probability of this happening TWICE is extremely low. Two different ridings, two different elections, both decided by ONE vote, both with mail-in ballots returned with postal code errors, both benefiting the same party. Think about that however you want....

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

I'm not saying someone's rigging elections. But when ONE VOTE decides who holds power, and that vote hinges on a "typo" made by the organization running the election... We've got a serious credibility problem.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Elections Canada claims to be independent. But I've seen too many "independent" organizations act in lockstep with the government. Like how the Bank of Canada claimed they didn't "print cash" during COVID while creating $400 billion in settlement balances. (more on this later)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wants viewers to see something important before opening a link. The link is to a Bank of Canada post from February 22, 2022. The post addresses the question of whether the Bank of Canada printed cash to finance the federal government, stating that they didn't. It explains that the Bank of Canada bought existing government bonds from banks on the open market to support and ensure a strong and stable economy during the pandemic. This action was intended to unblock frozen markets and support households, companies, and governments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before you open the link I just sent you, I want you to see this, and I'm gonna guide the people that are watching this, right, to see something that they probably didn't know. And I it's very important that people see this. Very, very important because it's going to add a reference to people that unfortunately here, this is the link. So this is what the Bank of Canada printed. Sorry, posted on the twenty second 02/2022. Here, click this link. And please share this. Okay? Speaker 1: Yeah. I'll bring it up here. One second. K. Here we go, folks. There you go. Okay. So Bank of Canada, you asked us if we printed cash to finance the federal government. We didn't. Keep reading to learn how we support the economy from the shock of the pandemic. It says the pandemic has been a crisis like no other. As a result, we took various measures like buying bonds to support and ensure strong and stable economy. We bought existing government bonds from banks on the open market. Why? This helped us, this helped unblock frozen markets at the start of the pandemic. It let households, companies, and governments Speaker 0: Okay. All all this you've lost already everybody.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

When institutions play word games to avoid admitting what they've done, trust dies. They didn't "print cash." They created digital money. They didn't "rig an election." They made a postal code "error" that changed the outcome. See how this works?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The sale of securities circumvented the standard process, flooding the market with money that doesn't exist, causing an inflationary crisis. This is essentially like printing money. The speaker clarifies that "printing money" doesn't mean physically printing bills. The Bank of Canada made an initial statement about printing money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even the sale of securities, they circumvented this whole process by working this way and flooded the market with money that doesn't exist, causing an inflationary crisis. Which which is like printing money. Speaker Basically. Speaker Right. When you say they flooded the market with money that doesn't exist, it's like printing money. To talk to all the people that think printing money is we actually printed hundred dollar bills. Yes. What a lie. If you go back and I don't want you to, but if you go back to the original post, look what he said. The first first thing where the Bank of Canada made that first statement about printing money.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Government institutions master plausible deniability. The perfect "mistake" is one that: • Changes the outcome • Can't be legally challenged • Has a reasonable explanation • Only affects one crucial instance Sound familiar?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 questions the accuracy of Elections Canada, suggesting the Tarrabon incident, where an error occurred, is not an isolated event. Speaker 1 expresses doubt that this was the only error of its kind and wants to know the probability of it being a unique occurrence, implying there are likely more errors that have been overlooked or "obsoleted."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's how I see it. That's that's that's what happened in Tarrabon. I'm eager to hear what you think. Speaker 1: Well, when you do the probabilities of it, I just I I I hear that and I go, one of the things I wonder with elections Canada is how many more they got wrong, that they they they obsoleted because of that. Yeah. Obviously, there that isn't a one off. I'd be shocked. I'd wanna know the probability of that being the only one like that. I would say that's probably, the probability is gonna be you know, it that happening just once, I highly doubt it.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

To be crystal clear: I'm not claiming conspiracy. I'm pointing out that our system's integrity can be undermined by a postal code typo. And the organization responsible for this "error" investigates itself, without real accountability.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is why so many Canadians feel the system is rigged. Not because they believe in shadowy cabals. But because they've watched "independent" institutions make "mistakes" that always seem to benefit the same side. And nothing changes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked about something but had been unplugged for at least ten days. They missed two mashups and were receiving texts asking for their whereabouts. The speaker mentions a kids sports forum and a twelve-hour livestream, all happening simultaneously.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I'm glad you brought it up because, once again, I was you were you asked me, do you hear about this? I'm like, dude, I've been unplugged for, like, at least ten days. Right? And missing two mashups, which I was getting texts like, where are you? Like, kids sports forum, twelve hour livestream, they all just collided all at the same time.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The math just doesn't add up. What are the odds of two nearly identical situations, both decided by one vote, both tainted by mail-in "errors," both benefiting the same party? If you think this is just bad luck, I've got oceanfront property in Saskatchewan.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

A single typo just flipped a Canadian election. Not because of Russian hackers or voter fraud. But because of THREE digits on an envelope. Here's who *actually* holds the power in Canadian politics:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Want the conversations too real for mainstream media? Subscribe to my Substack to never miss an episode of the podcast and to get exclusive content. Click below: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Check out the full episode of this podcast here: #849 - Vesper - https://www.youtube.com/live/bWDRAUboqgo

Saved - April 18, 2025 at 10:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent debate revealed a troubling state of our political system. It felt scripted, with journalists blocked and security threats used as excuses to silence independent voices. Politicians like Pierre seemed restrained, losing authenticity, while Carney appeared disconnected from everyday Canadians. The debate format favored the establishment, allowing interruptions and equal airtime for those not genuinely competing. We need politicians who speak directly to us, prioritizing authenticity over polished PR. It's time to demand a real democracy that serves the middle class.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

They killed democracy live on TV: • Scripted answers • Blocked journalists • Fake security threats How Canada's debate exposed the elite's playbook:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Pierre was neutered. Carney was pompous. Singh was there to carry water for the Liberals. And CBC canceled post-debate questions. After last night's debate, our political system is more broken than I thought.

Video Transcript AI Summary
All leaders performed relatively well in the debate, the first opportunity for Canadians to see them head-to-head. It was of particular interest how Mark Carney and Pierre Poliev would perform. Election debates typically only influence an election if someone does exceptionally well or terribly, which didn't happen. Mark Carney presented himself as the negotiator to handle Canada's crisis, appealing to concerns about Trump's threats and presenting himself as an economist. Pierre Poliev was a friendlier version of himself, after polls showed Quebecers were uncomfortable with his rhetoric. He focused on presenting a more personable version of himself. Jagmeet Singh had his best performance so far, appealing to Canadians to form a minority government. Yves-Francois Blanchet was in his comfort zone and less aggressive than expected, trying to win back voters looking at the Liberals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bureau chief Mercedes Stevenson is with me. Mercedes, how do you think this debate went for these leaders? Donna, all of the leaders performed relatively well tonight. The first time that Canadians have had the opportunity to see them head to head. Of particular interest, how Mark Carney and Pierre Poliev would perform when they were in this scenario. We've seen both of them out on the campaign trail, and in the case of Pierre Poliev, we've seen him in the House of Commons for, well, decades now, but we've never seen them take each other on. And there was a lot of questions around how the two leaders would present themselves and what kind of points they would make. As far as election debates go, typically, they only really influence an election if somebody really knocks it out of the park or does terribly. I don't think that either of those things happen tonight. What will be interesting is how the various performances change Canadians' perceptions. Let's take a look at how sort of each of the leaders presented themselves. Mark Carney came across as the man saying Canada is in crisis, and I am the negotiator to handle this. That has been a tried and true line for him on his campaign that people see him as someone who can solve the problem with Donald Trump. He was appealing to the concern about the existential crisis Canada could be in with Trump's threats about the fifty first state, and he presented himself as the economist who knows how to navigate difficult times. He spoke well and for someone who struggles in French, had a relatively good presentation. Pierre Poliev was a much friendlier version of himself. This comes after a lot of polls in Quebec were saying that Quebecers weren't comfortable with some of his rhetoric and tone, which could be aggressive and name calling. He looked much softer in this debate. He was smiling, much more reflective of what we saw from him, earlier this week on Sunday when he was on a French talk show called Toulomond en Parle. On there, he did not attack his opponent. He focused more on presenting a more personable version of himself. Jagmeet Singh, the NDP leader, probably honestly his best performance so far of the campaign. He landed a few elbows, and he appealed to Canadians to form a minority government, not a majority. Whether that complexity will be, communicated to Canadians and change how they vote remains to be seen. And then there was, of course, Yves Francois Blachat, the b q leader. This is really his comfort zone in his backyard. He was actually a little less aggressive than I expected him to be. He is trying to win boners back who are looking at going to the Liberals.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Our politics has become this weird performance art where nobody says what they actually think anymore. After 10 years of Liberals, we've got doubled housing costs and crime through the roof. And these politicians are worried about... their image? Come on.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Remember when Pierre was eating that apple during interviews? That guy was authentic, right? But last night we got "Somber Pierre" - like his PR team had him on a leash. Where's the fighter Canada actually needs right now? (from our Mashup livestream during the debate👇)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling them to stand up to the Americans from a position of strength. In response to criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting the questioner doesn't understand the tax code. The speaker also states that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But we actually help the environment Shut up. While putting home the jobs for our people at the we have to them At the same time, that is that is a sensible pragmatic approach that puts us in charge of our economic destiny so we can stand up to the Americans from a position of strength for a change. Mister Martin, we've got this hang on. I I I wanna get miss I wanna give you a chance to speak to mister Singh's criticism about oil and gas subsidies and mister Polyev's criticism about the industrial carbon tax. Okay. I'm gonna make. The oil and gas subsidies. I'll make four if you want. Our capital cost allowances, which are standard across the corporate garments of industry. We answered I answered this question last night, but I think doesn't understand the tax code. Everyone heard it. Yes, and oil and gas subsidies. That's why you need new Democrats to make Secondly, I've been the independent Shy. Secondly, recognizing that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

And don't get me started on Carney... guy was waving his hands around like he's conducting an orchestra while saying absolutely nothing. Classic banker type pretending he understands what regular Canadians are going through. You haven't lived in this country for over a decade!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Not one Canadian banker. If I may, the worst If may I finish? May I finish? May I ten more seconds to finish, please. Let him finish this point. That's the opportunity we have. That's the opportunity we have in carbon capture. That's the opportunity we have in small modular reactors. That's the opportunity we have in hydrogen beyond. This country can be a clean energy superpower my government will help deliver. That is time for the series. Gentlemen, let us go to our final theme, which is called leading in a crisis. Alright. Leading in Speaker 1: a to lose it. Speaker 0: What happened there? Just Okay. They they're going to a quick break, so I thought I'd throw everybody on and and somebody like Eli or Jasmine. Speaker 1: You wanna know something Speaker 0: Yeah. I wanna Speaker 1: know something fun about Mark Carney and all of his ideas when it comes to don't Speaker 0: there's anything fun about him. Speaker 1: No. But, you know, it's so fascinating to hear him talk about all these different things about energy and how it's gonna be so good for the environment. You're absolutely omitting the fact that Canada produces less than, I think, it's 1.5 of total global emissions. We could be wiped off the map. Speaker 0: Think wouldn't. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, there we go. And it wouldn't even matter. But also, the one part that nobody likes to discuss is, the fact that about 96% of all of the machinery and whatnot for climate change is made in China.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Maybe the most frustrating part is that Pierre actually won on substance but lost on style. He was saying all the right things But it felt like he was holding back the knockout punch we all wanted to see...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

So here's what really bugs me about the whole thing... The debate format itself seems designed to protect the establishment guys. It's like the deck is stacked before anyone even starts talking.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Did you notice how Singh was just interrupting everyone fighting for the Liberals, rather than challenging them? Or how Yves-Francois Blanchet—who doesn't even want to run Canada—got equal time in our English debate? This stuff isn't by accident, folks.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that law c 69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The no new development law c 69 guarantees there will not be a one stop shop because it requires the government of Canada to actually duplicate the same saying that have no rules no regulation. Have one stop shop. Mister over the energy. You're saying we just gotta let him finish his sentence. That is not true. In fact, mister Singh, the reality is we should have strong rules enforced once. We shouldn't have multiple levels of mercury. That takes it takes now seventeen years to get a major project approved in this That is why in the last ten years, we've had the worst economic growth in our in in the entire We cannot afford fourth pipeline. Liberal term.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The political elites and their media buddies have this whole system where: • Only conservatives get challenged by moderators • Parties that can't win get equal time • Independent journalists get the boot • "Security concerns" kill post-debate questions

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bomb-sniffing dogs searched bags to ensure safety. The Montreal police put up caution tape and escorted people out. Leaders of Canada's four parties who were able to participate in the debate didn't feel they could guarantee a proper environment and are not taking questions from journalists. This is an important part of the ritual of elections, democracies, and accountability. It is part of the stress test that these leaders go through as they seek to lead the country, spend tax revenue, and make laws. Serious things are being discussed about criminal justice and using the notwithstanding clause, requiring a serious and mature debate, not financially motivated stunts. With everything going on with Donald Trump, the economy, and the world, this is where the national Canadian election debate has ended up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I time stamped this for you. I'm dropping it right now in our chat if you wanna share it after this. Okay. Well, let's finish this, and then we'll go to the next one. Let's just finish this. Dudes, just hit play for Pete's sake. Speaker 1: Bomb sniffing dogs. John. Search the bags to make sure everything was safe. Speaker 0: Bomb sniffing dogs. Speaker 1: Leaders are safe and everybody in here is safe. Speaker 0: Can't afford to make bombs in Canada. We're broke. Speaker 1: The way this evolved today and yesterday, the Montreal police are here putting out caution tape, escorting people out. And the leaders of Canada's Four parties who were able to participate in this debate because they what was the phrase? Didn't feel they could provide or guarantee a proper environment. They're not gonna take questions from journalists. And look, I know not everybody thinks it's all about us, but it it it is an important part of the ritual of elections and democracies and accountability, and it is part of the stress test that these leaders go through as they seek to lead this country, you know, and and spend your tax revenue and make laws and some serious things being discussed here tonight about criminal justice and using the notwithstanding clause. These these are all things that require a serious and mature debate. Not financially motivated stunts. And this is where we've ended up in this election. With everything going on with Donald Trump and everything going on in this economy and everything going on in the world, this is where the national Canadian election debate has ended up.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

I mean, the most telling moment wasn't even during the debate itself. It was when they suddenly found a "security issue" to cancel the scrums, so independent journalists couldn't ask questions the CBC would never touch. Convenient, right?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Asmyn Gold watched it, and it got millions of views. Then The Daily Show talked about it, and it was all over the internet. Engage with the media in an adversarial role because they are an adversary. Allow them to freak out; don't be afraid of their freak out because the freak out is your free press. You can take your budget, stick it in your pocket, and watch them freak out, and then you win. Pierre won yesterday and today. He got handed an empty net with ten seconds left.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then eventually, like, what? Asmyn Gold watched it. It got millions of views. Next thing you know, The Daily Show's talking about it, and then it's all over the interwebs. That was months later. This is why you keep doing this kind of thing. You engage with the media, but you do it in an adversarial role because that's what they are. They're an adversary, and you allow them to have their freak out. Don't be afraid of their freak out. The freak out is your free press. You can you can literally take your your budget and stick it in your pocket and just go, hey. Fresh, you wanna talk about something? Let's watch you freak out, and then you win. This is how it works. Just so we're all clear, by the way. I mean, Pierre did win. He won yesterday, and he won today, and that's not because I'm CBC. Arginally compared to what he could have done. Okay. He got he got handed an empty net with ten seconds. Out to But Blanche had to play them. Let me flesh it out.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

So what do we do about all this? We need politicians who actually talk to us directly—not through some PR filter designed to please legacy media that's living off government handouts.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that ten years of irresponsible liberal policies have weakened borders and divided people. They believe it's crucial to end this division and unite the people, ensuring everyone feels safe and puts foreign conflicts behind them upon arrival. Another speaker expresses disagreement, stating that people from around the world care deeply about where they come from and should have the freedom to do so. They criticize the treatment of Palestinians as disgusting and claim that what's happening in Gaza has become a genocide. They advocate for an immediate ceasefire, the return of something, and a two-state solution with a viable and free Palestinian state living in peace and security alongside Israel. They question the role of dictating domestic policy in the Middle East and suggest getting out. Another speaker emphasizes the need for consistency in working together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ten years of incredibly irresponsible liberal policies on weak borders, of dividing people into groups, of saying one thing to one, group and the opposite to another, dividing and conquering. We must end that division and unite our people so that everyone feels safe. And that when we come here, we put our foreign conflicts behind, and we put That's that's Speaker 1: not enough Mister Seng, please go ahead. From around the world, and they care deeply about where they come from. And they should be able to do so. That's a part of being in our country to have that freedom. Your treatment of Palestinians has been frankly disgusting. Your treatment Speaker 2: of Gagwyn Singh's going pro freedom convoy here. Speaker 1: In Gaza has been disgusting. On top of that, people in Israel and in Palestine deserve to live in peace and security. And mister Kearney, to date, you've not acknowledged that what's going on in Gaza is now clearly become a genocide. It's important to call things out. Speaker 2: Low key standing up for Palestinians right now. If it's been a genocide, there's nobody left. We need to work. With our international partners, maximum pressure, maximum encouragement for an immediate ceasefire. That's the first thing. Encourage the return. Maximum effort. Maximum overdrive. My government put in place a hundred million of humanitarian raid, which is Speaker 1: When did they get Deadpool to run the party? Speaker 2: With respect to where this ultimately goes. Yes. Two state solution, but it has to be a viable and free Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with the state of Israel. I will understand. Happen though. Mister Who the hell do we think we are that we're gonna dictate domestic policy in The Middle East? We have Speaker 1: to I was thinking the same thing, dude. It's been fifty years. Speaker 2: Of Iran and do everything Speaker 1: Why don't we just get out? Speaker 2: To check it and turn it. Mister Blanchet. Speaker 1: If we are to work together, we will have to be consistent.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Pierre needs to just be himself again. That straight-talking guy who calls things what they are. That's why people connected with him in the first place. Being real always beats being polished. Always.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

We start fixing this when we stop accepting this watered-down version of democracy. When we demand politicians who say what they mean. When we reward authenticity over PR nonsense. When we call out these manufactured "crises" for what they are.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Netflix is supposedly not sending American movies to Canada on purpose, keeping Trump as the antagonizer because they have nothing else. Speaker 1 shares a condo with a local member of parliament who is a liberal. Their office is obsessed with the idea of Canada not becoming the 51st state. This is their strategy, along with the liberal media, to portray Mark Carney versus Donald Trump. However, Donald Trump has moved on and it's a non-story. The news is pending that this is a thing when Donald Trump is in a trade war with China and doesn't care about Canada anymore.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't touch this. I like it. You know? Like, he he's watching listening to music from, like, the eighties because that's all they have. Yeah. We're late. Not be not on purpose. It's not like Netflix is not sending our American movies to Canada. They're purposely keeping Trump as the the, the the antagonizer here Yeah. For them because what else do they have? Speaker 1: Well, to make your point, where I am now, it's condo I rent near my house where I that I work from, and I share it with a local member of parliament where I live who's a a liberal. So I've been to their office, and their office is just like it's all these, like, not fifty first state pinned, and they're just obsessed with that. Mhmm. Like, that is fine. I I think, as you say, like, that's their strategy, like, them and the liberal media to just be like, this is Mark Carney versus Donald Trump. The thing is Donald Trump kinda moved on, like, before the election even started. Like, it's a non non story. So if you turn on the news, they're just pending that that's a thing when, like, Donald Trump is a trade war with China. Like, he doesn't care about Canada anymore.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

At the end of the day, Poilievre was still the only one speaking up for the middle class last night. Just imagine what he could do if he stopped trying to please everyone and started fighting like our country depends on it. Because, I don't know... it kind of does.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

They killed democracy live on TV: • Scripted answers • Blocked journalists • Fake security threats How Canada's debate exposed the elite's playbook:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Want the conversations too real for mainstream media? Subscribe to my Substack to never miss an episode of the podcast and to get exclusive content. Click below: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2024, Canada experienced its largest drug bust, uncovering a $500 million operation involving Chinese triads, Iranian mafias, and Mexican cartels. The bust in Falkland revealed enough fentanyl to kill every Canadian twice. Law enforcement found significant quantities of drugs, cash, and firearms, indicating a sophisticated global conspiracy. Canada’s weak laws and port security facilitated this operation, raising concerns about national security and the opioid crisis. The geopolitical implications are alarming, prompting questions about government accountability and systemic vulnerabilities.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The largest drug bust in Canadian history was in 2024. And it revealed a global superpower conspiracy: • Chinese triads • Iranian mafias • Mexican cartels How they built a $500 MILLION empire in plain sight—in Canada:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

It all came down in a small town called Falkland, British Columbia. Law enforcement found enough product and chemicals to make 95.5 million lethal doses of fentanyl. Enough to kill every Canadian—TWICE. This is just the tip of the iceberg...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Authorities seized almost 400 kilos of meth and 54 kilos of fentanyl, along with smaller amounts of MDMA and cocaine. The lab had enough source material to potentially triple that output. Officials claim these enforcement actions have saved thousands of lives in Canada. They also served to deny this organized crime group an estimated $485,000,000 in profits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Producing an unprecedented amount of illicit drugs. In total they recovered almost 400 kilos of meth, fifty four kilos of fentanyl plus smaller amounts of MDMA and cocaine. And That's just the stuff that was ready, waiting to be shipped out. Investigators say this lab had enough source material on hand to potentially triple that output. Speaker 1: These enforcement actions have undoubtedly saved thousands of lives in Canada. It has also served to deny this transactional organized crime group an estimated $485,000,000 in profits.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

What the RCMP found was unreal: • $500,000 in cash • 54 kg of pure fentanyl • 390 kg of methamphetamine • 89 firearms including AR-15s • All the precursor chemicals needed to make their 95.5 million doses The most shocking part?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The RCMP mentioned a suspected connection to a Mexican cartel but didn't provide further details. An ex-RCMP organized crime unit member believes the operation involves significant international contacts, including cartel, Chinese, and Iranian networks, characterizing it as a corporation rather than a gang operation. Reports indicate increasing cooperation between international drug gangs, moving beyond the old narrative of them fighting each other. The RCMP stated the drugs were primarily destined for markets abroad. Vancouver's port infrastructure makes it attractive for cartels seeking to expand into the Asia Pacific market, which includes countries like China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the RCMP brought up that suspected connection to the Mexican cartel. They wouldn't go into much more detail about who else might be involved. So we asked someone who used to run the RCMP's transnational organized crime unit what he thought. Speaker 1: I think they've gotta have significant, contacts in different parts of the world. I'd be looking at the, cartel networks, the Chinese networks, the Iranian networks. But whoever it is, you know, looking at the quantity, that's a corporation. That's not gangs. Speaker 2: We're hearing more and more people who follow gangs and report on gangs, at least, here in BC, that there are these international connections. That the old, narrative of these international drug gangs fighting each other is is that. It's old. More and more they are cooperating. Speaker 0: The RCMP was also clear that these drugs, for the part, were headed for other countries. They were destined for abroad, and I can't elaborate quite yet because it's an ongoing investigation, but they were destined for a market abroad. Speaker 1: If the cartels want to expand and operate to the new markets the Asia Pacific area. Vancouver has the logistical infrastructure, I. E. Ports, to access this new market, you know, that they haven't really tapped into in the last several decades, I e, Asia Pacific, 3 Billion people. Speaker 0: Asia Pacific meaning countries like China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, all to say

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This wasn't just some local drug operation. It was a massive global conspiracy involving: • Chinese triads providing chemicals • Mexican cartels sharing production methods • Iranian-linked groups collaborating with traffickers How does this get built right under our noses?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discovery of several tons of unregulated chemicals believed to be used to produce P2P is of particular concern. P2P is a heavily controlled precursor and base ingredient used to make meth. Finding evidence that this group was manufacturing P2P from scratch is significant. Producing large quantities of chemicals requires people with chemical knowledge, such as a chemical engineer who's been working in industry. It could be a very well organized situation. The TV series Breaking Bad showed this method.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They were actually making their own, which is a whole other level of expertise. And of particular concern is the discovery of several tons of unregulated chemicals believed to be used to produce P2P. P2P is one of those precursors we talked about. It's one of the base ingredients used to make meth. It is a heavily controlled substance, and because of that, it's hard to find. It's also hard to make. So finding evidence that this group was manufacturing p two p from scratch, that's like the RCMP cracking an art heist and finding the Mona Lisa. Speaker 1: You do need to have people who have some chemical knowledge, especially when producing large quantities of chemicals. So you might have what's called a chemical engineer who's been working in industry and he knows what it involves. It could be a very well organized situation. Speaker 0: As most people know from the TV series or Breaking Bad, that was their method.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

And why Canada? Our ports have minimal security. Our money laundering laws are weak. Unlike the US, we don't have RICO laws to take down criminal enterprises. We're basically rolling out the red carpet for these guys:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The Chinese triads are the masterminds behind the chemical supply. They get tax rebates from the CCP to produce fentanyl precursors. You read that right. The Chinese government is subsidizing chemicals killing North Americans. This is asymmetric warfare.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Iranian networks collaborate with Chinese triads to smuggle these chemicals through Canadian ports. RCMP and US officials have confirmed these connections. It gets even more sinister when you look at the muscle behind the operation...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The "biggest and most sophisticated drug lab in Canadian history" has been dismantled in rural British Columbia. The RCMP seized 89 firearms, including a 50-caliber sniper rifle, restricted handguns, and AR-15 style rifles. Authorities seized 54 kilos of fentanyl, 390 kilos of meth, 35 kilos of cocaine, and 15 kilos of MDMA. The precursor chemicals and finished fentanyl products seized could have amounted to 95,000,000 potentially lethal doses of fentanyl. The lab was located in Falkland, about 40 kilometers west of Vernon, and raids were also conducted in Surrey, where most of the guns were found. Investigators believe there is a connection to cartels in Mexico and transnational criminals. Police seized half a million dollars in cash. Gaginpreet Randhawa faces six drug and weapons charges and remains in custody. Police would not say what countries the drugs were destined for.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is being called the biggest and most sophisticated drug lab in Canadian history is being dismantled after a massive takedown in rural British Columbia. As CTV's Ben Melter reports, Mounties believe the super lab is connected to transnational criminals. Speaker 1: This is a war weapon. Speaker 2: This 50 caliber sniper rifle, one of 89 firearms seized by Mounties, including restricted handguns and AR 15 style rifles. It's all part of an investigation into what the RCMP calls the largest and most sophisticated drug lab in Canadian history. Speaker 1: The precursor chemical in combination with the finished fentanyl products seized at this location could have amounted to 95,000,000 potentially lethal doses of fentanyl. Speaker 2: In addition to 54 kilos of fentanyl, police also seized 390 kilos of meth, thirty five kilos of cocaine, and 15 kilos of MDMA. Police say the lab was busted in the small community of Falkland, about 40 kilometers west of Vernon. After a months long investigation on Friday, officers conducted simultaneous raids on that property and two in Surrey, which is where they found most of the guns. Based on the techniques used to make the drugs, investigators believe there is a connection to cartels in Mexico, but would not get more specific. Speaker 1: These are high highly motivated, highly sophisticated criminals whose allegiances change, and they'll make deals with other groups and these kinds of things. But you heard me make mention today about Mexican cartels and transnational criminals. Speaker 2: Police don't believe the drugs were intended for sale in Canada or The United States but would not say what countries they were destined for, saying that would compromise ongoing investigations. Police also seized half a million dollars in cash. Despite the scale of the operation and the size of the weapons cash, only one person has been arrested so far. Gaginpreet Randhawa faces six drug and weapons charges, and police say he remains in custody. Ben Mildred, CTV News, Vancouver.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Enter the biker gangs... They provide security and handle distribution. According to former US State Department investigator David Asher, these gangs were hired to assassinate US targets. Including political figures. But that's not even the scariest part...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The lab in Falkland wasn't just some amateur operation. It was industrial-scale. They used a production technique pioneered by Mexican cartels using Chinese expertise. The RCMP called it "the largest and most sophisticated" drug operation in Canadian history.

Video Transcript AI Summary
RCMP in BC seized a record number of drugs and firearms from what they believe is Canada's largest and most sophisticated drug super lab. The seizure included 390 kilograms of methamphetamine, 54 kilograms of fentanyl, and 35 kilograms of cocaine, along with unregulated precursor chemicals. The drug lab was uncovered in Falkland, Northwest of Vernon. Police claim the over 95,000,000 potentially lethal doses of fentanyl seized could have killed every Canadian at least twice over. Investigators also searched locations in Surrey, discovering 89 guns and explosives. The months-long investigation was conducted by the RCMP Federal Policing Program. Gangnam Creek Rondawa faces six drugs and firearms charges, and police say the investigation is ongoing, with more people potentially facing charges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RCMP in BC have seized a record number of drugs and firearms from what's believed to be the largest and most sophisticated drug super lab in Canada's history. The seizure includes three ninety kilograms of methamphetamine, fifty four kilograms of fentanyl and 35 kilograms of cocaine along with massive amounts of unregulated precursor chemicals. Mounties uncovered the drug lab this weekend in Falkland, Northwest of Vernon. The over 95,000,000 potentially legal doses of fentanyl that have been seized could have taken the lives of every Canadian at least twice over. Investigators also searched locations in Surrey where 89 guns and explosives were discovered. The months long investigation was conducted by the RCMP Federal Policing Program. So far, one arrest has been made. Gangnam Creek, Rondawa faces six drugs and firearms charges. Police say the investigation is ongoing and more people could be charged.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Again, how did this happen right under our noses? Canada has a major legal problem called the "Stinchcombe law." When US authorities target phone numbers in Canada, police must INFORM that person they're being targeted. How can you run an undercover operation like that?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The RCMP conducted raids in Falkland and Surrey, BC, dismantling what they call the biggest super lab in Canadian history. The operation seized a mountain of meth, cocaine, MDMA, fentanyl, and an arsenal of weapons, denying a transactional organized crime group an estimated $485 million in profits. The sophisticated operation, located on a rural property in Falkland, was capable of producing large quantities of meth and fentanyl. Thousands of kilograms of precursor chemicals, linked to Mexican cartels, were also seized. The drugs were believed to be destined for abroad, not the US. This bust is connected to another in Enderby, where 30,000 kilograms of precursor chemicals were seized. Only one man, Gaginpreet Singh Randhawa, has been arrested and faces six counts related to weapons and drugs, but the RCMP is promising more arrests. Mexican cartels operate in Canada through proxies. The cleanup of the Falkland property could cost over $1 million.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A mountain of meth and other drugs, including cocaine, MDMA, and fentanyl, protected by an arsenal of weapons. Everything from handguns to assault rifles, some loaded and ready to use. Investigators rolling out the hall from a bust that the RCMP calls the biggest super lab in Canadian history. Speaker 1: It has also served to deny this transactional organized crime group an estimated $485,000,000 in profits. Speaker 0: The raids taking place Friday, October 25 at a rural property in Falkland. The rundown exterior hiding a sophisticated operation that was capable of pumping out huge quantities of meth and fentanyl. Investigators also seizing thousands of kilograms of precursor chemicals, specifically chemicals used in a process tied to Mexican cartels. The drugs believed to be mostly for export, but according to the RCMP, the destination was not The US. Speaker 1: They were destined for abroad, and I can't elaborate quite yet because it's an ongoing investigation. Speaker 0: All of these guns and drugs were seized at locations in Surrey and Falkland, BC. According to the RCMP, this bus tied to another one at the October in Enderby, where 30,000 kilograms of precursor chemicals were seized. The Enderby Bust and the Falkland Bust this past weekend, part of a much larger transnational criminal organization operating in BC. The super lab set up to run for weeks without resupplying the input chemicals. But despite the sophistication and size of the operation, only one man has been arrested, Gaginpreet Singh Randhawa, facing six counts related to weapons and drugs. The RCMP promising more arrests. Speaker 1: Mexican cartels, don't have their headquarters located in Canada, but they have proxies that operate in Canada, elsewhere. And, those are the people that we're focused on and, aim to, bring to justice. Speaker 0: Investigators are still on scene in Falkland. Now that the super lab has been dismantled, the cost to clean up this rural property could top $1,000,000. Aaron MacArthur, Global News.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Our ports are another massive vulnerability. Most drugs move from Mexico to Canada, then into the northwest United States on ships. We have almost no port enforcement. So the US doesn't know what's coming in beyond what their intelligence sources can gather.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

But then you follow the money... These networks launder drug profits through Canadian real estate and banks. About 90% of all money laundering in the US is tied to China. And where do those networks operate from? Canada. Specifically, Toronto. The consequences go deep:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The output from just this one lab could have made the opioid crisis exponentially worse. We're already seeing 200+ deaths DAILY in North America from opioids. It's not just a drug problem—it's a national security threat. But there's something else to consider:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The geopolitical angle can't be ignored. When Chinese state-linked companies provide chemicals... When biker gangs are hired to assassinate political figures... When Iranian networks collaborate with traffickers... It's about destabilizing our society. So what's being done?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The Trump administration was so concerned about Canada's weak enforcement that it was the original reason they threatened 25% tariffs. It worked. Trudeau quickly pledged $1.3 billion for border security. But is that enough to fix the systemic problems?

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump stated that the proposed 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods will be implemented on March 4 as planned. This is due to his claim that drugs are flowing into the U.S. from those countries. Trump said that drugs continue to pour into the country, killing hundreds of thousands of people, and that the U.S. is losing substantially more than 100,000 people. He stated that families are destroyed as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: US president Donald Trump said on Thursday that his proposed 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods will go into effect on March 4 as scheduled because of what he said were drugs flowing into The US from those countries. Speaker 1: The drugs continue to pour into our country killing hundreds of thousands of people. We're losing substantially more than a hundred thousand people. I mean, dead. They're dead. The families are destroyed after that happens.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is hybrid warfare. Nearly 100,000 people are dying every year. Why are our laws so weak? Who benefits from our vulnerability? Why does our government allow this to happen? These are the questions we need to be asking.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The largest drug bust in Canadian history was in 2024. And it revealed a global superpower conspiracy: • Chinese triads • Iranian mafias • Mexican cartels How they built a $500 MILLION empire in plain sight—in Canada:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Want the conversations too real for mainstream media? Subscribe to my Substack to never miss an episode of the podcast and to get exclusive content. Click below: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 7:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm outraged by the suggestion from a Liberal MP to collect a Chinese bounty on his Conservative opponent, highlighting serious concerns about foreign interference in Canadian politics. This incident, along with revelations that multiple MPs have knowingly aided foreign governments, raises alarms about our democracy. Despite overwhelming evidence of foreign influence, our government remains secretive, allowing compromised officials to continue in power. We must demand transparency and accountability to protect our sovereignty and ensure our elected representatives serve Canadians, not foreign interests.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This should make EVERY Canadian's blood boil. A Liberal MP suggested collecting a Chinese BOUNTY on his opponent. But the fallout is highlighting a darker truth about foreign interference. Here's how China is influencing Canadian elections:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Paul Chiang—a Liberal MP and ex-cop—suggested people collect a $183,000 Chinese bounty on his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay. This wasn't a slip-up. He said it openly at a Chinese media event. Let that sink in.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Liberal candidate Paul Cheng dropped out of the federal campaign after comments he made about conservative rival Joe Tae. Cheng, a Liberal MP running for reelection, told a Chinese language newspaper to claim the $1,000,000 Hong Kong bounty on Tae if he was brought to Toronto's Chinese Consulate. Tae, born in Hong Kong, is a pro-democracy activist with a bounty on him by Hong Kong police. Cheng stated he does not want to be a distraction and is standing aside. This occurred on the same day Liberal leader Mark Carney voiced support for Cheng.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A liberal candidate has dropped out of the federal campaign after comments he made about a former conservative rival. Paul Cheng, a liberal MP running for reelection in the Toronto area writing of Markham Unionville told a Chinese language newspaper, quote, to everyone here you can claim the $1,000,000 Hong Kong bounty if you bring conservative candidate Joe Tae to Toronto's Chinese Consulate. Tae, who was born in Hong Kong before immigrating to Canada, is a pro democracy activist and has a bounty on him by Hong Kong police. Chang now says he does not want to be a distraction and is standing aside. It came on the same day liberal leader Mark Carney voiced support for the candidate.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Mark Carney's response? He called it a "teachable moment" and kept Chiang as a candidate. Only after massive backlash did Chiang withdraw himself. But the most disturbing part is this is just the tip of the foreign influence iceberg...

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual with integrity, who served as a senior police officer for over 25 years, made a terrible lapse in judgment and has apologized. He has family in Hong Kong and understands the situation there and in China. He has apologized directly to the individual concerned and to the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a person of integrity who served this community, his community, as a police as senior police officer for, as I said, more than a quarter century. He's made a terrible lapse in in judgment. He's made an apology for that. It's also an individual who has has family in Hong Kong. He's under no illusions about the situation there, the situation in broader China. He's made those apologies. He's made them directly to the individual concerned. He's made them directly to me.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Last summer, a national security report revealed something I can't believe we aren't still talking about: MULTIPLE Canadian MPs "wittingly" helped foreign governments interfere in our politics. The main culprits? China and India, with a little Pakistan thrown in.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Conservative candidate Joe Tae demanded Mark Carney fire Paul Chang before Chang withdrew from the race. Tae stated that no apology would suffice, and characterized Chang's actions as tradecraft of the Chinese Communist Party aimed at interfering in Canada. Tae claimed these actions were intended to send a chilling signal to the entire community, forcing compliance with Beijing's political goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before Chang removed himself from the race, Joe Tae, who was a conservative candidate for the Toronto riding of Don Valley North, stated Mark Carney must fire Paul Chang. No apology is sufficient. Threats like these are the tradecraft of the Chinese Communist Party to interfere in Canada. And they are not just aimed at me. They are intended to send a chilling signal to the entire community in order to force compliance to Beijing's political goals.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

These corrupt politicians aren't passive participants. They're accepting money from foreign governments. Who's to say they aren't sharing confidential info? How can we prove hostile countries don't influence political decisions? And our government won't tell us who they are.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada claims India possesses both the intent and capability to interfere in Canadian elections, particularly targeting Indo-Canadian communities. According to Canada, India ranks as the second most active country in electoral foreign interference, after China. India's interference impacts all levels of Canadian government, allegedly conducted by diplomatic officials and proxies. Canada believes India is acting due to New Delhi's perception that Canada is not adequately addressing the Sikh separatist movement and the security threats it poses to India.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, impacting results for favorable candidates. This time around, Canada claiming India has intent and the capability to interfere in election processes and particularly interfere with Indo Canadian communities. It's saying India is the second most active country engaging in electoral foreign interference after China. Also, that India focuses its foreign interferences and impacts all levels of government and that diplomatic officials in Canada and proxies are are who are conducting such interference processes. And the reason Canada believes India is doing this is because it thinks that New Delhi believes that Canada is not taking this question of the Sikh separatist movement growing in Canada seriously enough and the security threats that it poses to India from within Canada.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Why won't they name names? Minister LeBlanc claims it would be "inappropriate" to identify these traitors. So these compromised officials continue serving in Parliament. They keep access to sensitive information. They vote on laws that affect all Canadians.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is a direct attack on Canadian sovereignty. When foreign powers buy influence with elected officials, we no longer have true democracy. When MPs are more loyal to Beijing than Ottawa, our system is corrupted. This isn't partisan—it spans all parties.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc testified at the foreign interference inquiry, stating Canadians can vote with confidence. He expressed a preference for being promptly informed by senior staff about urgent matters, even if it meant being contacted at inconvenient times. PMO officials explained that some information, like notes about foreign interference, didn't reach the Prime Minister due to world events in early March 2020 that interrupted the process. They added that briefings are sometimes delivered in paper form for security reasons. According to PMO staff, CSIS never names individuals in briefings and is restricted in what information it can share outside the government, sometimes resulting in MPs not fully understanding the warnings they receive. Security expert Wesley Wark believes Bill C-70 will improve this by allowing CSIS to share some information with politicians and diaspora communities. Wark anticipates that India and China's alleged interference will be prominent in the inquiry's final report, and that all future governments will need to pay close attention to intelligence. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scheduled to testify on Wednesday.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The day after RCMP alleged Indian diplomats are connected to the killing of a Canadian citizen, the public safety minister took the stand. Speaker 1: I have total confidence that we Speaker 2: can Speaker 1: have a we can have elections that would be carried out in total safety. Speaker 0: Dominic LeBlanc testified at the foreign interference inquiry where he said Canadians can vote in confidence, but he had a different message from his fellow ministers about senior staff giving him intelligence. Speaker 3: I'd much rather they phone me or wake me up on a Friday night, with some urgent matter than find out two days later that we missed a window. So it it it's quite it's quite free flowing. Speaker 0: Earlier in the day, senior officials from the prime minister's office explained why some information, like notes about foreign interference, didn't get to the prime minister's desk. Speaker 2: Early March, as we all know, 2020, the whole world changed. The country changed. Parliament itself stopped sitting, so this note was interrupted, it did not go to the prime minister. Speaker 0: They said some briefings are now delivered in paper for security. The PMO staffers also stated CESAs never named individuals in briefings, and they specified the security agency is handcuffed in what information it can give to people outside of government. Speaker 2: Meetings can often be so general that the member of parliament doesn't even know what it is there. Doesn't can leave the room not fully knowing what it is they're being warned off of or what they should be be nervous about. Speaker 0: Security expert Wesley Wark says built c 70 will help that. It allows CISIS to provide some info to politicians, diaspora communities, or other targeted people. With new revelations about India's alleged interference, Wark says he expects it along with China to be prominent in the final report scheduled for December release. Speaker 4: We may have finally, if you like, come to a point where no government of of whatever its political orientation and its policy desires, no government can afford not to pay attention to intelligence. Speaker 0: The final witness, prime minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday. Nathaniel Dove, Global News.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The evidence is overwhelming: • Foreign police stations operating on Canadian soil • Intimidation of Canadian citizens by foreign agents • Threats against politicians who criticize foreign regimes • Widespread election interference campaigns Yet the response has been weak.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

In a functioning democracy, politicians caught working for or with foreign governments would be: • Removed from office • Publicly identified • Criminally investigated • Fully prosecuted Instead we get excuses and secrecy.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This rot goes deeper than most realize. Our government cooperated with China to return "economic criminals" to China. They allowed Chinese agents to operate here. They accepted evidence from torture. All for better trade deals.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

As Canadians, we need to demand: • Full transparency about compromised MPs • Immediate removal of those working for foreign states • Stronger anti-interference laws • Real consequences for betrayal Our democracy depends on it.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

What pisses me off most is these corrupted politicians remain in Parliament making decisions affecting us. They vote on laws, attend classified briefings, and represent Canada internationally. All while secretly serving foreign masters. This should outrage every Canadian.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

But the solution starts with us. We must pressure elected officials for transparency. We must demand accountability from our government. Our government won't protect democracy unless we force them to.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This should make EVERY Canadian's blood boil. A Liberal MP suggested collecting a Chinese BOUNTY on his opponent. But the fallout is highlighting a darker truth about foreign interference. Here's how China is influencing Canadian elections:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Want the conversations too real for mainstream media? Subscribe to my Substack to never miss an episode of the podcast and to get exclusive content. Click below: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 11:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared alarming insights about the scale of Chinese cyberattacks on Canada, which occur at a staggering rate of 3,000 per minute. Scott McGregor, a former military analyst, revealed the extensive infiltration of China into our political and economic systems, labeling it "hybrid warfare." Despite uncovering serious threats, including the suppression of critical reports like "Project Sidewinder," the government remains silent. McGregor warns that we are in a war for our sovereignty, driven by economic control and political influence. Will Canadians recognize this threat in time?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

There are 3,000 Chinese cyberattacks PER MINUTE in Canada. And after 20 years of protecting our secrets, This man is breaking his silence. Here's the classified truth about China's control over Canada:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Meet Scott McGregor. He served in all 3 branches of Canada's military - Army, Navy & Air Force. His last role? Senior domestic intelligence analyst for North America's West Coast. But what he uncovered about China left him stunned...

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Canadian military veteran served twenty years in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Their last role was as the senior domestic intelligence analyst for the West Coast Of North America. They were a diplomatic defense attache in The Middle East and completed the initial tour in Afghanistan in 02/2006.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sure. I'm a Canadian military veteran. I served in the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force. I spent twenty years in the military. My last role was in intelligence, so I worked as the senior domestic intelligence analyst for the West Coast Of North America. I was a diplomatic defense attache in The Middle East and did the initial tour in Afghanistan in 02/2006.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

As a diplomatic defense attaché in the Middle East, McGregor saw the worst of state-sponsored attacks. But nothing prepared him for what China was doing to Canada. These aren't random hackers in basements. They have entire brigades working for their military...

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, Chinese cyber activity is not the work of individuals, but rather entire military brigades. The speaker asserts that the U.S. is already in a hybrid war, specifically at war with China. While the public may not accept this, the speaker claims the intelligence community is aware and understands the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Chinese cyber is not some guy sitting in his basement. They have an entire brigades of people that work for the military that are conducting these operations. So we're already in a hybrid war. We're already at war with China. People may not want to accept it, and that's fine. But the intelligence community understands it, and they know what's going on.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The attacks target: • Provincial infrastructure • Government agencies • Financial networks • Critical systems But here's what most Canadians don't realize:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reports, including one from the United States, identify China as the number one threat, followed by Russia, Iran, and North Korea. The American assessment also cited Russia as a major threat. These countries are conducting hybrid warfare. China is the biggest threat of all. China attacks Canada; one province's infrastructure agencies are attacked 3,000 times per minute by China.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of those reports, including the most recent one from The United States, identify China as the number one threat, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Those are facts. Those are made public. Those are things that you can rely on. So the American assessment cited Russia as one of their major threats. Are these countries all conducting hybrid warfare? They sure are. But the biggest threat of all is China. China attacks Canada, and this is an old statistic, this goes back a number of years. But in one province, their provincial infrastructure, so all of their agencies, are attacked 3,000 times per minute by China.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

These cyberattacks are just one piece of a much larger strategy. McGregor calls it "hybrid warfare" - a three-pronged assault on Canada: • Political influence • Economic control • Transnational crime The goal? Complete control of our systems...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hybrid warfare has existed for a long time and is not new. It involves political, economic, and transnational organized crime. The speaker is a security advisor on the Council for Countering Hybrid Warfare, an international think tank. Tactics used in hybrid warfare, such as cognitive warfare and cyber warfare, are methods of influence. Hybrid warfare aims to control the narrative and resources. Nations worldwide engage in hybrid warfare to varying degrees, attempting to impact sentiment within other countries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's it's been around forever. It's not something new. I'm a security adviser on the Council for Countering Hybrid Warfare, which is an international think tank discussing about discussing international alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, negotiation, and how that works within conflict around the topic of hybrid warfare. Because basically everything is a conflict when it comes to this. Hybrid warfare, simplest terms, is political, economic, and transnational organized crime. So I just keep it really simple like that, just for the listeners. The tactics that are used when it comes to cognitive warfare, you'll hear all these different terms, cyber. These are all methods of influencing those things. Hybrid warfare is about control. Controlling the narrative, gaining control of resources, it's all about the control. Is it conducted by all of the nations? Pretty much. Everybody's doing it to a certain extent. They're trying to impact sentiment in a country.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

But the most alarming part is how China's influence has deeply penetrated our institutions. The US Department of Justice, including FBI and CIA, identified Canada as a national security threat. Why? Because of Chinese activity in our:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The book focuses on the infiltration of Canada, which the United States has considered critical for the last thirty years. The book opens with a U.S. Department of Justice document, including input from the NSA, FBI, and CIA, identifying Canada as a national security threat to the United States. This threat is attributed to Chinese activity within the Canadian government, institutions, and critical infrastructure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thus, the book is about what happened in America's backyard, which is Canada. So, the infiltration of Canada, has been critical for The United States for the last thirty years. And the book has an opening, which is about a document written by Department of Justice in The United States, including the NSA, FBI, CIA, and everyone else, identifying Canada as a national security threat to The United States because of the Chinese activity going on within our government, within our institutions, within our critical infrastructure.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

• Government • Critical infrastructure • Financial systems • Educational institutions • Real estate markets But when Canadian intelligence wrote a report about this threat? It was shut down...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The report, called "Project Sidewinder," exposed how deeply China had already infiltrated our political system. And our own government buried it. The US report was called "Project Dragonlord" - and it revealed something even more disturbing:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thirty years ago, Canada wrote a report called Project Sidewinder that was shut down. The speaker's book mentions a project called Dragon Lord. The other speaker notes that Sam Cooper's book mentions the speaker's book. The speaker was previously unaware of Sam Cooper and other individuals involved in the topic at hand. The speaker identifies political, economic, and transnational areas as the three main areas of hybrid warfare, with the goal of controlling the narrative. The speaker believes the narrative has been controlled very well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's thirty years ago. Canada had written a report about that as well, but it was shut down. It was called Sidewinder, Project Sidewinder. This one is called Dragon Lord, so it's in the Speaker 1: book anyway. Speaker 0: If I Speaker 1: may just for quick hot second. Speaker 0: And that's my my book list Speaker 1: keeps growing on these Canadian authors that are doing things. I'm I'm chewing my way through Sam Cooper's book, it gives mention to yours. Then, of course, gives mention again. And I'm like, oh, man. I didn't you know? I'd never heard of Sam Cooper. I've certainly never heard of you. I'd never heard of a bunch of different people, when it comes to regards to what we're talking about. But I look at the things you're rattling off, political, economic, and trans transnational as being the the three main areas of hybrid warfare, and the whole goal is to control the narrative. I would say the narrative has been, controlled very well.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Canada has become China's gateway to North America. They're using our: • Weak laws • Limited enforcement • Political vulnerabilities To establish control over critical resources while we look the other way...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The strategy is working. China now controls: • Key mining operations • Major oil companies • Vast tracts of farmland • Critical technology firms And our government's response?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Silence. When politicians try to speak up about China's influence, they get pushed out. The last leader who proposed a comprehensive plan to counter China was Erin O'Toole. Gone within months.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

McGregor's warning is clear: We're already at war with China. Not with bullets or bombs. But through economic control, political influence, and systematic dismantling of our sovereignty. The question is: Will Canadians wake up in time?

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to hear more from Scott, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

There are 3,000 Chinese cyberattacks PER MINUTE in Canada. And after 20 years of protecting our secrets, This man is breaking his silence. Here's the classified truth about China's control over Canada:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Scott was my guest on the podcast this week. You can get a lot more details than what this thread offers here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0x84Cv1x31EQV91eqddVUz?si=4wO587diT0S57eOKA1Za_Q Also available on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/live/gXUAx5no1VU?si=U9dP2oZIaJlivLld

Page not found open.spotify.com
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 11:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Alberta Health Services has released a troubling report on their COVID response, revealing a lack of transparency and cooperation. Despite spending $2 million on the investigation, officials are accused of hiding their mistakes and avoiding accountability. The report contrasts sharply with the National Citizens Inquiry, which gathered extensive evidence from ordinary Canadians. The fallout from the pandemic has severely impacted mental health, education, and community cohesion. While officials evade scrutiny, citizens are demanding answers and rebuilding their communities.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The most damaging report in Canada's healthcare system just became public: Alberta Health Services blew $2 million to investigate their COVID response. But REFUSED to cooperate with their own investigation! I read all 269 pages. Here's what they're trying to hide:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The report was released on Friday late afternoon. They hoped no one would see it. But the same bureaucrats who locked us down, closed our schools, mandated masks, and claimed to "follow the science" are now hiding from scrutiny. It's not just suspicious—this is damning.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A $2,000,000 report on Alberta's pandemic response is calling for a halt to COVID-19 vaccines, facing criticism from the Alberta Medical Association as anti-science. The NDP argues the funds could have better supported healthcare, like orthopedic surgeries. The report, authored by 13 doctors and academics, claims COVID-19 infections did not decrease with mask mandates and vaccinations, questioning vaccine safety. Nahed Nenshi urges the premier to clarify her stance on the findings, while the AMA states the report undermines trust in health professionals and overlooks frontline experiences. Experts, including U of A professor Timothy Caulfield, label the report as misinformation. Alberta's health ministry defends the report's purchase, emphasizing the need for diverse perspectives, but offers no commitment to implement its recommendations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new $2,000,000 report on Alberta's pandemic response is calling for a halt to COVID nineteen vaccines, but the document is being widely criticized called anti science and anti evidence by the Alberta Medical Association. Speaker 1: We were pretty disappointed in the findings and and and how things were represented. Speaker 0: The NDP opposition agrees arguing the money should have instead been used to improve health care. Speaker 2: $2,000,000 would have funded orthopedic surgeries at the Royal Alex Hospital for eight years. And we spent $2,000,000 to throw taxpayers money at every anti vaxx extremist around the world, not Albertans, not experts. Speaker 0: The report released last Friday and prepared by 13 doctors and academics says, quote, the number of COVID nineteen infections did not decrease despite the implementation of mask mandates and widespread vaccination, and it cannot be concluded that these COVID nineteen vaccines are safe. Nahed Nenshi is now calling on the premier to clearly state whether or not she supports the findings. Speaker 2: Premier, take a stand. Either you believe in this stuff and you believe in spending taxpayer money on it and you're gonna implement it, and we wanna hear that from you. Or admit that you're just doing this to pander to extremist space. Speaker 0: The AMA says the report ignores scientific consensus, sows distrust of health professionals, and did not properly take into account the experiences of frontline workers. Speaker 1: How about a bunch of, experts, physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists who worked for months and months and months looking after patients and unfortunately watching many of them die? Speaker 0: Other experts agree the report is problematic. U of A professor Timothy Caulfield taking to social media to call it misinformation and nonsensical. A statement from Alberta's health ministry defended buying the report claiming it's important to consider a broad variety of perspectives. Still, the government is making no promises that any of the recommendations in the review will ever be implemented. From Edmonton, Sean Amato, City News.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The task force's opening lines tell you everything: "There appears to be a fundamental lack of transparency and willingness to reveal information and discuss decisions and actions taken by AHS during the pandemic." Translation: They're still covering up their mistakes.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Now compare this to the National Citizens Inquiry. Regular Canadians—not politicians or bureaucrats—spent 24 days in 8 cities, gathering sworn testimony from 300+ witnesses. 5,324 pages of evidence. No government funding. Total transparency. It's what truth-seeking looks like.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

While citizens fought for answers, Alberta officials played a different game. They had a pandemic plan, developed over years, tested and refined. But they threw it away. Why? Because following their own plan exposed their agenda. And their message refuses to change...

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a lack of objectivity regarding the situation, which affects the advice given to the Alberta government and its citizens. Experts express concern about the influence of such reports, not just in Alberta but nationwide. It's essential to trust in the effectiveness of vaccines, as they have significantly impacted society over the past two generations. However, up to 35% of Canadian parents may doubt vaccination for their children. Social isolation, masking, and vaccine development are crucial for future public health, and it's vital that the public adheres to scientific guidance. The province plans to review the report and its findings, but no policy decisions have been made yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lack of objectivity. These are not people who are being objective about the situation, trying to give the best advice that the Alberta government and Albertans should be following. Speaker 1: Experts say there is concern about the influence of a report such as this, not just in Alberta, but across the country. Speaker 2: So we have to have faith that vaccines work. Vaccines have changed civilization over the past 2 generations. It's problematic to me that as many as 35% of parents in Canada may no longer believe in vaccination for their children. Speaker 3: Social isolation and masking, you know, obviously, if you're sick, staying away from public, and then, you know, development of vaccines. All these things we're going to need in the future at some time, and we need to make sure that the public will listen to science. Speaker 1: The province says it will review and consider the report and its findings, but no policy decisions have been made yet.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Look at what happened to our children. Kids who once loved school became anxious and withdrawn. Straight-A students fell behind. Social skills deteriorated. All while officials claimed "children are resilient." They weren't. They were sacrificed.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The mental health crisis was even darker. Elderly parents died alone. Small business owners lost everything. Religious communities were torn apart. Substance abuse deaths DOUBLED as people sought escape from isolation. Officials knew. They just didn't care.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Neja Bakshi from Edmonton's Aurora Alexander Hospital shared a poignant experience on Twitter about informing a woman that her 75-year-old mother was dying from COVID. The daughter was shocked and hung up, later apologizing for her reaction. The hospital arranged for an iPad so they could say goodbye, and the patient requested her lipstick, wanting to look good in her final moments. Doctor Bakshi described the emotional weight of being a conduit for love during such a difficult time. In Alberta, over 27,100 COVID-related deaths have occurred, with nearly 500 in the last four months. Doctor Darren Marklin, working in the ICU, noted the unpredictability of patient outcomes, emphasizing that even young, healthy individuals can face severe illness, sometimes taking weeks or months to recover or pass away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We hear numbers of 20 deaths per day, 30 deaths per day, and it gets really easy to get numb to those numbers. Speaker 1: That's why doctor Neja Baxhi, who works on the internal medicine ward at Edmonton's Aurora Alexander Hospital, took to Twitter this week to recount calling a woman to tell her her 75 year old mother was dying from COVID. Speaker 0: As expected, very she was very shocked, and, ended up hanging up the phone on me, which is very understandable. Speaker 1: Doctor Bakshi calls back. The daughter on the phone says, I'm so sorry for hanging up on you. I was shocked. I didn't even know she wasn't well. The hospital arranged for an iPad to be brought in so the mom and daughter could say goodbye. But first, the patient asked for her lipstick. Speaker 0: She was just so insistent that she needed to look good when she died. Speaker 1: Doctor Bakshi says it was an emotional call. Eventually, she sat with the patient and the daughter on the iPad in silence for 30 minutes as the woman passed away. Speaker 0: It's a very weird feeling. You feel close to the family in that moment, but you also feel very distant. And as a physician or the nurse that's doing that, you are the conduit for the love between those 22 parties, and it's it's a great responsibility. Speaker 1: More than 27100 people have died from COVID in Alberta since the pandemic began. Nearly 500 of those deaths reported in the past 4 months. Doctor Darren Marklin has seen many of those deaths working in the ICU. Speaker 2: We don't have good ways of predicting who's going to do well and who isn't. Speaker 1: We caught up with doctor Marklin on his way to work. He says when someone is admitted to the ICU, they're put on a ventilator and then into a deep coma. Speaker 2: We see some people die very quickly. But again, yeah, when you get a young, healthy previously healthy person, it can take up to 6 weeks, months sometimes. Speaker 1: He says they're seeing more and more of those patients. Speaker 2: And now there are people like you and me. They are young. They're healthy. They don't have much else wrong with them. Speaker 1: Kim Smith, Global News.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Their data system wasn't just broken—it was designed to confuse. • 72-hour delays in basic statistics • ICU numbers underreported by 20% • 40% of cases had zero contact tracing • 17 separate health systems that couldn't communicate Perfect for hiding inconvenient truths.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Talana Hargreeves and her family contracted COVID-19 but are now recovering. Her son described feeling like his bones were hollow. Despite taking precautions, they caught the virus from a school outbreak. Thankfully, none required hospitalization, unlike over 450 Albertans currently hospitalized, with nearly 100 in intensive care, prompting the province to prepare to increase ICU capacity to 425 beds. Doctors emphasize the need for more experienced staff to manage complex cases. The province hopes these preparations won't be necessary and urges Albertans to adhere to new restrictions. Hargreeves' family is prioritizing safety and will not gather with others this Christmas to set an example.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For whatever reason, we were lucky. Speaker 1: Talana Hargreeves' entire family caught COVID 19. They're almost fully recovered now, but there were some scary moments. Speaker 0: My 11 year old son commented that it felt like his bones were hollow. Speaker 1: Hargreaves says they took all the precautions they could but caught it anyway. Speaker 0: We know it was from a a classroom school outbreak. Speaker 1: She's thankful none of them were sick enough to be admitted to hospital. The same can't be said for more than 450 Albertans who are hospitalized with COVID right now, nearly a 100 of them in intensive care. That's the most so far. Some are already double bunked in a single room. It all has the province preparing to more than double its capacity to 425 ICU beds. But doctors warn more staff will be needed too. Speaker 2: It's one thing to imbue people with skills and protocols. It's another thing to give them, the experience to actually be able to manage people with this complexity. It's disrupting the entire way that a normal system that functions well works. Speaker 1: The province is hoping that planning is just a precaution. Speaker 2: Hope it is not necessary, and ultimately, that's up to Albertans to respond positively, to both the restrictions and guidelines, articulated, by the government last week. There's no doubt that the hospital system is under significant strain. Speaker 1: But public health insists it will be able to handle hospitalization and ICU patient increases, though that may mean further pushing back wait times for other surgeries and procedures. Talana Hargreeves' family though is not taking chances. Speaker 0: But if we can lead by example and just say, hey. We're going to keep you guys safe even if you're not as worried, then we just we have to do that. Speaker 1: That means this Christmas, they won't be seeing anybody else. Rafi Budjikanian, CBC News, Edmonton.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The elderly paid the ultimate price. Your grandmother, who survived war and depression, died alone in a care home. No family allowed. No final goodbyes. Not because of COVID. Because of policies they still won't explain.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

People saw through the lies. From April 2020 to December 2021, confidence in Alberta's response crashed from 72% to 37%. Where messaging was most manipulated, people stopped listening entirely. Communities crumbled while officials hid behind "modeling" and "projections."

Video Transcript AI Summary
University of Alberta Health Law professor Ubaka Gbogu highlights that politicians are undermining the authority of Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Hinshaw, indicating a lack of control over the pandemic response. He suggests that decisions are being made by those without the appropriate expertise. Hinshaw, who did not respond to an interview request, stated at a recent news conference that her role is to provide policy options to the cabinet, which ultimately makes the final decisions. She expressed gratitude that her recommendations are considered. A spokesperson for Premier Kenny emphasized that it is the responsibility of elected officials to make these decisions and denied any political interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: University of Alberta Health Law professor Ubaka Gbogu says politicians are clearly undermining Hinshaw's authority. The story tells me that the chief medical officer of health doesn't have control of the pandemic response. It tells me that decisions are being made by persons who shouldn't be making decisions. Hinshaw did not respond to an interview request. At a news conference yesterday, she said her job is to provide a range of policy options to cabinet who make the final call. I am grateful that my recommendations have always been respectfully considered in the final decisions. A spokesperson for Kenny said it is the job of elected officials to make these decisions, and he said there was no political interference. Jenny Russell, CBC News, Edmonton.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This wasn't incompetence. It was calculated. They knew lockdowns were destroying mental health. They knew substance abuse was soaring. They knew isolation was killing seniors. They knew businesses were dying. They knew. And they did it anyway.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The task force exposed something darker than COVID mismanagement. It exposed a government willing to sacrifice its people for political control. It exposed bureaucrats who STILL won't answer for their choices. It exposed a system that betrayed us all.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

But here's what gives me hope: While they hide from questions, citizens are demanding answers. While they avoid accountability, communities are rebuilding. While they cling to power, truth is emerging.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The truth is: When government agencies refuse transparency, we all lose.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

I'm Shaun—husband, father of 3, and full-time podcaster in Western Canada. On the SNP we explore hot topics that divide humanity, as well as faith, family, and Canadian life. Subscribe to enrich your mind with interesting perspectives: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The most damaging report in Canada's healthcare system just became public: Alberta Health Services blew $2 million to investigate their COVID response. But REFUSED to cooperate with their own investigation! I read all 269 pages. Here's what they're trying to hide: https://t.co/gwwys9xpdG

Saved - October 31, 2024 at 7:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m deeply troubled by the Canadian government's approach to assisted dying, which began with terminally ill patients but has now expanded to include young people with mental health issues. The numbers have skyrocketed, and cases like Alan Nichols, who was euthanized for hearing loss, highlight the alarming trend. Many are choosing death due to financial struggles or loneliness, while doctors are encouraged to present it as a treatment option. This shift seems driven by cost-cutting rather than compassion, raising serious ethical concerns about the value of life in our healthcare system.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is f*cked up. The Canadian government is helping people commit suicide. They started with the terminally ill. Now they're about to help depressed 20-year-olds end their lives. Here's all you need to know about this horrifying new reality: 🧵

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

MAiD (Medically Assisted in Dying) started out simple enough in 2016. Someone's 80, terminal cancer, and two months to live, we help you go peacefully—we all get that. Made sense. Nobody was really arguing. But then they took it a step further...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Amir Farsud has applied for medically assisted dying (MAID) due to constant agony from a back injury and the impending sale of his rooming house, leaving him unable to find affordable housing. Surviving on over $100 a month from Ontario disability support, he faces the reality of homelessness. Although he meets the criteria for MAID due to his physical suffering, his true motivation stems from the fear of being homeless. His doctor has signed off on the application, and he is awaiting a second approval, with a potential access to MAID in about a month. Despite his pain, Farsud expresses a desire to live, emphasizing that he does not wish to die.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you afraid to die? Speaker 1: Who isn't? Yeah. It it, I Speaker 0: am. Amir Farsud has applied for medically assisted dying, known as MAID. He lives in constant agony due to a back injury, but has started the process for end of life because his rooming house is up for sale, and he can't find anywhere else to live that he can afford. He barely survives on Ontario disability support payments, which are just over $100 a month. He doesn't want to die, but being homeless is not an option. Speaker 1: I know in my present health condition, I would survive it anyway. Speaker 0: Farzud meets the criteria for MAID, physical suffering due to disability that cannot be relieved. His doctor, who knows Farsud's real reason for MAID is his fear of being homeless, signed off on the application in August. Farsud needs a second to do the same. There's a 90 day waiting period he believes he could potentially access MAID in about a month. Speaker 1: I don't wish to be dead, even with the pain, even with the meds. I still wanna be here.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Just like every government program, once they got that first "win," they had to justify their existence. So the numbers exploded: From 1,000 deaths in the first year to 13,000+ in 2022. Now MAiD runs on two tracks:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Track 1: • Terminal illness, death's around the corner. Track 2: • You're young, maybe depressed or anxious, maybe chronic illness (but definitely not dying). Now you can get MAiD too. Let me give you an example that'll blow your mind:

Video Transcript AI Summary
When medically assisted dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, it was limited to those facing imminent death, but accessibility expanded in March. Critics argue that MAID devalues the lives of people with disabilities, particularly those living in poverty. The Netherlands has monthly reviews of assisted dying cases, while Canada only publishes annual statistics. Last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of deaths in Canada, with cancer as the leading cause. Although many seek MAID, the federal government emphasizes safeguards to ensure eligibility is carefully considered. Canada is set to further expand MAID eligibility to include individuals with mental disorders, potentially increasing its prevalence to about 4% of all deaths, similar to Belgium and the Netherlands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When medically assisted dying became legal in Canada in 2016, it was only for people facing imminent death. Accessibility was expanded last March. Speaker 1: We have created a system where ending of life is an easier and cheaper solution than actually investing in health care and and social support. Speaker 0: Trudeau Lemons is a professor of law and bioethics at U of T. He argues MAID devalues the life of people with disabilities who often live in poverty. Speaker 1: I actually had not expected that it would so go so fast and and that this particular issue of people living in poverty asking for medical assistance, dying would so rapidly take off in the Canadian context and that physicians would sign off on it. Speaker 0: So what is the solution in your mind? Speaker 1: The solution is, in my view, to go back to the drawing table. Speaker 0: The Netherlands has monthly commissions that review troubling assisted dying cases. Canada does not. It does publish yearly stats. The latest shows last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada or 10,064 people. That's a 32.4% increase over the year before. 65% of cases report cancer as the underlying reason. 81% of requests resulted in the administration of MAID. The average age is 76. Amir is 54. While he doesn't want to die, he wants to have the choice. Speaker 1: At the end of the day, it's it's a personal decision. Speaker 0: City News asked the federal government for comment on this story. In an email response, it points out there are enhanced safeguards and states it is highly unlikely 2 doctors would deem a person eligible for MAID if they had reason to believe their, quote, suffering could be relieved on a sustained basis by access to reasonable and available treatment and social services. Canada is one of the most liberal countries in the world when it comes to medically assisted dying. In March, it's further expanding eligibility to include people with mental disorders. It's expected MAID will be about 4% of all deaths in this country. That's in line with Belgium and the Netherlands. We will keep in touch with Amir Farsud.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Guy named Alan Nichols, 61 years old. • Not terminal • Hospitalized because his family feared he may be suicidal A month later Alan requests to be euthanized. The reason on his MAiD application?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Euthanasia has been legal in Canada since 2016, and next year it will extend to mental health conditions. In June 2019, 61-year-old Alan Nichols requested euthanasia after being hospitalized in Chilliwack, Canada. His brother, Gary, shares that while there are cases where assisted dying is beneficial, it can be problematic if applied carelessly, putting families in difficult situations. Before his hospitalization, Alan faced challenges due to a benign brain tumor diagnosed in his youth, which led to surgeries that affected his right side and hearing. Despite these challenges, Alan lived a relatively normal life and was not completely incapacitated, raising concerns about the appropriateness of his euthanasia decision.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since 2016, euthanasia has been legal in Canada. And next year, the right to request assisted suicide is due to be extended to mental health as well as physical health conditions. In June 2019, 61 year old Alan Nichols was was taken to hospital in Chilliwack, Canada. Within a month, he had requested euthanasia and died by lethal injection. His brother, Gary Nichols, is here to tell us about it. Gary, it's good to meet you. Speaker 1: Yes. Hi there, Flo. Hey. I'm glad you're telling Allan's story. It needs to be told just to make people aware of some of the problems really with medical assisted dying. There's a lot of cases maybe where it's it's a good thing, you know. There's no need to watch somebody suffer, but if it's gonna be loosely and sloppy applied, it's a terrible position for a family to be in. Speaker 0: And this was the position that you found yourself in, with your wife Trish and your other brother Wayne as well. Could you just tell me a little bit about the situation before Alan was hospitalized? What what was his life like before that time? Speaker 1: It it was a a challenging life. When he was a a young boy at 1213, he was, diagnosed with a a brain tumor, a benign tumor. So the surgeons, proceeded with surgery to remove the tumor. Unfortunately, it grew back, so they went in and surgically removed a deeper cut of the tumor, which unfortunately had to remove part of his brain, which affected mostly his right side. So his right side was quite physically, not at first impaired, as well as his hearing. As his life went on, he actually lived a fairly normal life. I think he had mental challenges on the way as his hearing started to diminish and he noticed his right side. I mean, there's a lot of things he couldn't do now, like play hockey or maybe run, but he could walk and do function quite normal. Speaker 0: It was perhaps complicated, but it was still a a life worth living. You wouldn't say that this was someone who was completely incapacitated or at the end of their life in the way that you might think of a euthanasia patient being.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

He applied to die because of his "hearing loss." That's it. And they killed him, even though his family tried to stop it. But that's not all, MAiD gets even worse:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

People are choosing death because they're homeless. Because they're lonely, or can't afford care. And our government––instead of actually helping these people––is like: "Hey, we've got this other solution..." Here's another sad story:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Sean Tagert was 41 years old with Lou Gehrig's disease. He needed 24-hour care, but they would only cover 16. The other 8 hours would cost him $206 EVERY day. Result? He chose death over going broke.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three key points to address. First, it's essential for the public and healthcare professionals to understand what natural dying and death truly entail. Much of the fear surrounding this topic is unfounded, as natural dying can be comfortable with proper palliative care. Second, access to care that emphasizes living is crucial, as many feel burdened without community support and a sense of shared responsibility for one another. Lastly, the discussion around dying should be separate from medicine, as intertwining them undermines the physician's role in advocating for healing and disrupts the patient-physician relationship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have 3 quick things, if I may, that I would love to wave my wand about. The first one is I would want the general public and healthcare professionals to really understand, Ashley, what natural dying and death look like because a lot of this has been driven by fear that's not founded in fact and most often, natural dying and death are very comfortable and what palliative care actually can do, because I think part of that is what initiated all of this. So, that would be wonderful And to have people to have access to care, to focus on living, would be a huge piece because of that. People feel a burden because they don't have that community support and sense of responsibility of caring for one another that we've come so far away from in this ultra autonomous view of of of personhood, which I think is is missing. And then the last thing would just be, actually, I think it should be completely separate from medicine. This totally undermines, we don't have time to go into this today, the role of the physician in advocating and responsibility for healing and recovery, and it totally interrupts that physician patient, responsibility. So I think outside of medicine, would be really critical.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

In our hospitals, it's gotten completely out of hand. Doctors aren't just waiting for people to ask. They're told to bring it up like, it's just another treatment option. "Oh, you're struggling to pay for care? Well, have you considered...?" Now they're trying to expand it:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you're mentally ill and want to end your life, you'll be able to. With government help. It's already part of the bill, but won't go into effect until 2027. And they're even talking about including minors if they're "mature enough."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mental illness as the sole basis for medically assisted death will likely be delayed for at least three years. Federal Health Minister Mark Holland introduced legislation to postpone the expansion of the program until March 2027. This decision primarily affects Canadians with severe, treatment-resistant mental disorders who were hoping to apply for the program. Independent Senator Stanley Kutcher criticized the joint committee for failing to represent witness testimony and uphold the rights of Canadians. The CEO of Dying With Dignity Canada expressed disappointment, noting that only a small number of individuals qualify for the program, similar to evidence from Belgium, where it has been legal for 20 years. These individuals often have a long history of mental disorders that have not responded to treatment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mental illness is the sole basis for a legally assisted death will likely have to wait at least another 3 years. Federal health minister Mark Halland introduced legislation that if passed would postpone the government's plan to expand the medical assistance in dying program until March 2027. Adam Atkinson joins us live in studio with the details. Speaker 1: Good evening, Adam. Thanks, Matt. This move won't affect a lot of Canadians, but there are some who are struggling with severe mental disorders and are treatment resistant. And they were looking forward to applying for the medical assistance in dying program. Speaker 2: We understand that this is a deeply personal topic and an issue that may be challenging for some. We're also aware that many Canadians hold strong opinions about this issue and that there has been much misinformation about this that has impacted on public discourse. Speaker 1: Independent Canadian senator Stanley Kutcher from Nova Scotia says the joint committee he sat on failed Canadians. Speaker 2: We think that the committee failed to respect its mandate. It failed to accurately represent the weight of witness testimony, and ultimately, it failed to uphold the charge of rights of all Canadians. Speaker 1: Federal health minister Mark Holland introduced legislation that, if passed, would postpone the government's plan to expand the medical assistance in dying program for another 3 years. The CEO of Dying With Dignity Canada says people struggling with untreatable mental disorders have already waited long enough. Speaker 3: Yeah. We were certainly disheartened and I think discouraged, particularly on the part of that very small group of individuals who have been waiting to access MAID, under the sole underlying condition of a mental disorder. Speaker 1: Helen Long says there are very few Canadians who would even qualify for the MAID program. Speaker 3: We know from the evidence in Belgium where this has been legal for 20 years that we're talking about a very small number of people. People who have a long history, years if not decades, of mental disorder that has not responded to treatment.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

And once again, what is this about? You guessed it––money. Studies show MAiD saves the Canadian healthcare system up to $130+ million every year. We're literally killing citizens because it's cheaper than taking care of them. It's just cost-cutting with a body count.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a psychiatrist in community mental health, I've seen how MAID affects my patients. Some express a desire to stop treatment, feeling they can choose to die instead. This shift undermines our efforts to support their recovery; we're now focused on preventing MAID as much as preventing suicide. I recall a patient, Ray, 62, with metastatic lung cancer, who had long sought MAID. When I confirmed his eligibility, I witnessed a physical transformation in him—his shoulders relaxed, and he smiled for the first time. He decided to proceed with MAID, and during the process, he expressed gratitude, saying, "I think you saved my life." This highlights the importance of providing care for those who truly need and want it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John, can you tell us something from your personal experience that has strengthened your conviction on this issue? Speaker 1: As a psychiatrist who works with community mental health team, supporting people with the most serious mental illnesses. We are becoming overwhelmed by what MAID has introduced into our clinical worlds. I have patients who are already saying, I'm gonna stop treatment. I'm not gonna keep trying. I can die. Our efforts to help them stick with the very challenging and sometimes long term treatment required to heal and recover is being undermined. We're not just doing suicide prevention anymore. We're doing MAID prevention. Speaker 0: I'm going to tell you about a gentleman I'll call Ray, who was 62 years old with metastatic lung cancer. And Ray had been asking for MAID for quite some time. And as he and I worked through the rigorous eligibility criteria, at some point, I was able to sit in front of him and tell him he was eligible for this care. And when I sat there and did that, I saw in him a physical transformation, which I've learned actually happens almost every time. I saw his shoulders relax. I think I saw him smile for the first time since I'd met him. And it was immediately followed by an expression of gratitude for the mere possibility. He decided to proceed with MAID, and we held it not long after, in the rooftop garden of the facility in which he was living. And as is required by law, I was seeking his final consent before I administered the medication. He was surrounded by his friends. And as he gave me that consent, he reached out and grabbed my hand. He looked at me, and he said, I know this is gonna sound odd, doctor Green, but I think you saved my life. And it reminds me all the time that for the people who actually need and want this care, it is tremendously important.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Here's the truth: When your government starts offering to "end your suffering" instead of actually helping you live, that's not compassion. That's them looking at their budget and deciding you're too expensive to keep alive. And sadly...Canada's leading the charge.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is f*cked up. The Canadian government is helping people commit suicide. They started with the terminally ill. Now they're about to help depressed 20-year-olds end their lives. Here's all you need to know about this horrifying new reality: 🧵

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

I'm Shaun—husband, father of 3, and full-time podcaster in Western Canada. On the SNP we explore hot topics that divide humanity, as well as faith, family, and Canadian life. Subscribe to enrich your mind with interesting perspectives: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the situation between Canada and India alarming. It all began with Trudeau's diplomatic blunder in 2018 when he invited a convicted terrorist to official events, which angered India. Over the years, Trudeau's administration ignored India's security concerns and allowed anti-India activities to thrive in Canada. The crisis escalated in September 2023 when Trudeau accused India of assassinating a Canadian citizen, leading to severe diplomatic fallout. Now, Canada faces significant repercussions, including halted cultural exchanges and a damaged international reputation. Rebuilding these ties will take years, and the lesson is clear: ideology should not drive foreign policy.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is insane. 2 weeks ago, Canada got blacklisted by the world's fastest-growing economy. Not because of trade, territory, or military conflicts... But because of a catastrophic decision made by one idiotic man: (a thread 🧵)

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Before Trudeau, Canada-India relations were thriving: • Past issues resolved • Growing educational ties • Strong trade partnerships • Strong cultural connections Under Stephen Harper, we'd built the strongest relationship in decades. Then came the collapse...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Justin Trudeau claims he doesn't need to explain how he will fund his promises, suggesting that the budget will balance itself. However, he has now changed his stance and admits he will run a modest deficit. This deficit, he says, will be so small it's almost invisible, but it will last for three years, totaling around $10 billion each year. We've seen this before, and it raises concerns about the impact of such "modest" deficits, especially considering the financial situation in Ontario.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Justin Trudeau says he doesn't have to explain how he will pay for his promises. Once again, tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of new spending because, as he famously announced, the budget will balance itself. Do budgets balance themselves in Hamilton region here? Well, actually, friends, let's be fair. Justin is now changing his tune. He now says today he will run a deficit, a modest deficit. I guess it turns out the budget doesn't balance itself after all. But he'll run a, he says, a modest deficit, a tiny deficit. So small, you can hardly see the deficit. That's what he says. A modest deficit. And only for 3 years. Only for oh, 3 deficits. 3, 3 modest little deficits. And maybe $10,000,000,000 each. Modest $10,000,000,000 deficit to start with. Friends, we've gone through this before. Look at look at the mess in Ontario with the modest deficits of a little more capital.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

In 2018, Trudeau visited India on a diplomatic trip. It was meant to strengthen ties, but Trudeau's team invited a convicted terrorist to official events... The international media had a field day with Canada. India was ticked. But that was just the beginning...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Within the next 5 years, Trudeau managed to: • Ignore India's security concerns • Allow separatist activities to flourish • Push India to restrict visas for Canadians • Let anti-India parades happen on Canadian soil The relationship was crumbling, but not ruined (yet).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kalistan groups protested outside the Indian consulate in Vancouver, demanding its closure. They believe the consulate acts as a spy agency, tracking and intimidating the Sikh community in Canada. Gurkirt Singh from Surrey's Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara emphasized that advocates for Kalistan are unsafe while the consulate operates, especially following the assassination of Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijer. The RCMP recently reported India's involvement in foreign interference, including violence and intimidation against Canadians. Activists feel it's crucial for the Canadian government to address this issue. India has denied these allegations, and tensions between India and Canada have escalated, resulting in the expulsion of diplomats from both nations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pearl Kalistan groups rallied in front of the Indian consulate in downtown Vancouver Friday afternoon. Guru Nanak's Sikh temple management committee, a Kalistan referendum advocacy group wants a Canadian government to shut down the Indian consulate in Vancouver and Toronto. Speaker 1: Well, we all have known for a very long time that the Indian consulate is actually just a spy agency in Canada because this is where they track us, they spy on us. Speaker 2: If we truly want this crime in Canada to stop, the people responsible for it and where it's taking place and orchestrated must be shut down. Speaker 0: Gurkirt Singh with Surrey's guru, Nanak Sigh Gurdwara says, Calistan advocates are not safe while the Indian consulate remains in operation. This comes after prominent sick leader, Hardeep Singh Nijer, was gunned down last year in the parking lot of the temple he led. Speaker 2: It's really important that the Canadian government continue to, unravel and disrupt, this violence that Indian state is conducting here in Canada. Speaker 0: Last week, the RCMP released information which alleges India's involvement in foreign interference, which includes extortion, acts of violence, and intimidation against Canadians with the aim of advancing the interest of the Indian government. Speaker 1: It's good to know that it's out in front of the world and good to know that Indian state finally is being exposed in front of everybody. Speaker 0: India has rejected the accusations, and the escalating dispute between India and Canada has led to the expulsion of diplomats from both countries. In Vancouver, Angela Bauer, City News.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

September 2023: Without warning, Trudeau publicly accuses India's government of assassinating a Canadian citizen. India calls the claims "absurd." The diplomatic fallout is immediate and severe. Now it was India's turn.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Canadian security agencies are investigating credible allegations linking Indian government agents to the murder of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nejjar. Canada prioritizes the safety of its citizens and the defense of its sovereignty. Law enforcement and security agencies are focused on ensuring this safety and holding those responsible for the murder accountable. Canada has expressed its serious concerns to senior Indian intelligence and security officials. At the recent G20 summit, these concerns were directly communicated to Prime Minister Modi, emphasizing that any foreign government involvement in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of sovereignty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the past number of weeks, Canadian security agencies have been actively pursuing credible allegations of a potential link between agents of the government of India and the killing of a Canadian citizen, Hardeep Singh Nejjar. Canada is a rule of law country. The protection of our citizens and defense of our sovereignty are fundamental. Our top priorities have therefore been, 1, that our law enforcement and security agencies ensure the continued safety of all Canadians, and 2, that all steps be taken to hold perpetrators of this murder to account. Canada has declared its deep concerns to the top intelligence and security officials of the Indian government. Last week at the G 20, I brought them personally and directly to prime minister Modi in no uncertain terms. Any involvement of a foreign government in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of our sovereignty.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

India retaliates hard: • Cancels diplomatic immunity for 41 Canadian diplomats • Forces 2/3 of Canada's diplomats to leave • Labels Canada a "safe haven for terrorists" • Restricts visas for Canadians The damage to our international reputation is pretty ugly.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Then came the final blow last October. Canada expelled 6 Indian diplomats. So naturally, India immediately kicks out 6 of ours. For context: This kind of mutual diplomatic expulsion is extremely rare between democratic allies. So what are we looking at going forward?

Video Transcript AI Summary
India has announced the withdrawal of its officials. We are not looking for diplomatic conflict with India, but we will not remain silent while any country's agents are involved in threats, harassment, or violence against Canadians. Since September 2023, the Canadian government has not provided any information to us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: India announced it would withdraw its officials. To be clear, we're not seeking diplomatic confrontation with India but we will not sit quietly as agents of any country are linked to efforts to threaten, harass, or even kill Canadians. Speaker 1: Since September of 2023, the Canadian government has not shared any shred of information with us.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This diplomatic crisis impacts real Canadians: • Cultural exchanges halted • Visa processing disrupted • Educational partnerships threatened • Trade worth $8 billion annually at risk But there's an even bigger problem:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

The Geopolitical Cost: While Trudeau picks fights with India, they're: • Becoming a global superpower • Strengthening ties with our allies • Emerging as a key counter to China • Building the world's 5th largest economy Meanwhile, Canada stands alone.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

Decades of careful diplomacy have been undone by Trudeau's leadership. Rebuilding these ties will take years––if not decades. And every day Canadians will pay the price for his failures. The lesson is clear:

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

When ideology drives foreign policy instead of national interest, everyone loses. Canada needs leadership that can repair international relationships, not destroy them. Our future prosperity may depend on it.

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

If you found this thread thought-provoking... • Drop a follow @SNewmanPodcast for more • Like/Repost the quote below if you can And if you want to dive even deeper into topics that really matter, keep scrolling...

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

This is insane. 2 weeks ago, Canada got blacklisted by the world's fastest-growing economy. Not because of trade, territory, or military conflicts... But because of a catastrophic decision made by one idiotic man: (a thread 🧵)

@SNewmanPodcast - Shaun Newman Podcast

I'm Shaun—husband, father of 3, and full-time podcaster in Western Canada. On the SNP we explore hot topics that divide humanity, as well as faith, family, and Canadian life. Subscribe to enrich your mind with interesting perspectives: https://shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com/

Shaun Newman Podcast Substack | Substack Exclusive content from the Shaun Newman Podcast. Click to read Shaun Newman Podcast Substack, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. shaunnewmanpodcast.substack.com
View Full Interactive Feed