TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SageListener
reSee.it AI Summary
Iโm raising alarms about the consequences of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, connecting them to a rise in deaths and cancers among children. For the first time in my career, Iโve encountered young patients with colon cancer, including an 8-year-old, and a 13-year-old who tragically died from metastatic pancreatic cancer. I support Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as he possesses a deep understanding of the science that surpasses that of many doctors. These issues require immediate attention.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จDr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the LA Times and a renowned transplant surgeon, is raising alarms about the fallout from mRNA COVID-19 โvaccines,โ linking them to unprecedented deaths and cancers in children. โFor the first time in my career, Iโve seen an 8-year-old, 9-year-old, and 10-year-old with colon cancer.โ โA 13-year-old child died of metastatic pancreatic cancer.โ He has thrown his support behind Robert F. Kennedy Jr., stating Kennedy โknows more about the science than most doctors.โ These revelations demand urgent attention.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The effectiveness and safety of vaccines is a crucial topic we need to address. California will face two major crises in recovery over the next decade, alongside a troubling rise in cancer cases. For the first time in my career, I've seen children as young as 8 diagnosed with colon cancer and a 13-year-old die from metastatic pancreatic cancer. We must confront these realities. The positive aspect is that we now have effective therapies available, thanks to our advanced understanding of science.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this idea of the effectiveness and safety of the of the vaccines is real science. We need to talk about it. And guess what? Not only are we gonna have 2 big crises about the recovery of California over the next decade, but we're gonna have to address the rising incidence of cancer, for the first time in my career. I've seen an 8 year old, 9 year old, 10 year old with colon cancer.
The first time in my career, I have had a 13 year old child in our clinic die of metastatic pancreatic cancer. We have to face, this effectiveness and face reality. The good news is that we can do something about it. The good news now, there are effective therapies because we understand the science in such an immense way.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
@RadioGenoa ๐ฅDr. Maslouf: This is not Islamophobia, is truth. https://t.co/rQxRRdoN2d
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe faces an unprecedented situation by welcoming a civilization that has historically been hostile. Throughout history, European ancestors fought to prevent the spread of Islam, which has long sought to conquer the continent. The current mindset in Western Europe dismisses these historical conflicts as misunderstandings, ignoring the underlying Islamic principles that drive such ambitions. While some migrants may seek a better life, there's a prevailing animosity towards Christians, viewing them as infidels. This situation reflects a broader moral conflict, where those promoting Islam see themselves as the bearers of goodness. The hope lies in awakening to the realities of history and the nature of Islam, recognizing its fundamentally hostile stance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're not doomed yet, but and in all of world history, there has never been a civilization that has so opened its doors to another civilization that is openly hostile to it. So this is unprecedented, what's happening. Your ancestors of Europe, when I describe it in my books because I write about history, fought tooth and nail to prevent Islam from entering and conquering Mhmm. Europe because that was one of the grand plans that went on for century after century from the east. The Turks were trying to enter the Constantinople.
They surrounded Vienna in 16/83. And before that, the Muslims, I told you, went up into tours in France. In 732, 1000 years later, this was an actual goal. And now Western Europe is saying, oh, none of that matters. It's all it was a misunderstanding.
Come on in. But they haven't changed. That mental and when I say they, you know, that's obviously I'm simplifying. The mentality that I've described is part of Islam. It's an Islamic concept.
So the Islamic State, you're told, oh, yeah. They have nothing to do with Islam. They're they've twisted it. No. They haven't.
They are a representation of what Islam the caliphs, the sultanates, the emirates, that's how they operated. The heads of Islam, the Grand Imams and the Muftis said the same exact thing. K? So it's it that is what it is. Again, it's not my point to arguing, oh, well, this particular migrant wants to conquer you.
Maybe he doesn't. Maybe he's looking for a good life. I understand that, and that's what makes it complicated. But, to to just animosity for Christians and so called infidels and the imperative animosity for Christians and so called infidels and the imperative to conquer the world in the name of jihad for Allah, which they're the good guys. Keep in mind.
They never see themselves as the bad guys. This is one of the issues with all conflicts. They're not bad guys. They're good guys in their mind. You're the bad guys because they're infidels, and they're trying to bring the light of Islam to you.
So that's another, aspect of how moral or the morality that they feel. They're the good guys, okay, in doing this, because look at you, Denmark and Europe. You're all you're all dissipated drunks and, you know, profligates and, you know, there's no no real I'm I'm sharing with you their arguments because I read it and I hear it. So they're bringing to you goodness. Okay?
But for but before, your ancestors because I guess they had their own social order and their own goodness, you know, was called Christianity, were able to fight it. But I guess in this current void of sort of this atheistic climate, anything goes, and who's to say they're wrong? Maybe they're right, etcetera, etcetera. And now you have what's happening. So it's a very unprecedented experience.
A A lot of people talk about the Roman Empire, this sort of thing happened, but it didn't, and we can get into that. It was actually they were still cognizant of trying to maintain their own social cultural mores, Rome. And it fell to the the Goths and the Germanic peoples. And I'm I'm just saying some people use this analogy. But in this case, this is completely your doing, not you, but it's Europe's doing.
Yeah. Okay. You're bringing a hostile force that's openly hostile. And lo and behold, when I look where Muslims are, I see chaos and violence and criminality and rape and grooming in England. Okay?
That's that's what always happens, Andre Islam. Okay? So is there a hope? I think so. I hope so in time, but it's it's so bad that this even that it even had to get to this point.
You know, it's such an abnegation and betrayal of your own heritage of these men and women who fought and died to preserve your way of life against an open hostile force, and now they're being welcomed in and, you know, oh, what why not? It's what they are. So I guess, so it's a matter of time. So where's the hope? Yeah.
Excuse me. So where's the hope you said? There there is The hope is to wake up wake up and see what reality and what I'm talking about and understand the history and the doctrine of Islam and what Islam is all about. Islam is unequivocally hostile.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ Chris Christieโs nightmare: drones raiding his McDonaldโs stash! https://t.co/0YInz5NjYT
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฟ๐ฟBIDEN FAMILY PREACHES & HONORS THE LAW https://t.co/FOtNXSTNFW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The proposed actions aim to save lives by funding crisis intervention and implementing red flag laws to prevent dangerous individuals from accessing guns. Voters have called for both parties to address crime and gun violence. Strict laws are in place for drug offenses, mandating jail time without the possibility of probation. It is emphasized that those who pose a threat must be removed from society for the safety of families. Additionally, there is a concern about the misuse of intimate images in relationships, where individuals may face blackmail or humiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does include actions I've long called for that are going to save lives. It funds crisis intervention, including red flag laws. It keeps guns out of the hands of people who are a danger to themselves and to others.
Speaker 1: I make you clear.
Speaker 2: There are forfeiture statutes. You can, the government can, take everything you own, everything from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you've just got caught engaging in. They can take everything.
Speaker 1: I need you clear.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Voters sent a clear message last night. Both parties have to step up and do something about crime as well as gun violence.
Speaker 1: I need you clear.
Speaker 2: If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, 1 quarter of $1, we passed a law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says, you're caught with that, you go to jail for 5 years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice.
Speaker 1: I need you clear.
Speaker 2: I don't care why they've become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families.
Speaker 0: So I
Speaker 2: don't wanna ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street.
Speaker 1: I make you clear.
Speaker 0: How many times have
Speaker 1: you heard
Speaker 0: I bet everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line that in an intimate relationship, what happened was the guy takes a revealing picture of his naked friend or whatever in a compromising position. And then, literally, in a sense, blackmails them or or mortifies that person. Send it out. Put it online.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฅSTORY OF THANKSGIVING: https://t.co/3WCUzCofvd
Video Transcript AI Summary
The story of the pilgrims begins in the early 17th century when they faced persecution in England for their religious beliefs. Seeking freedom, a group of about 40 separatists fled to Holland before deciding to journey to the New World aboard the Mayflower in 1620. Led by William Bradford, they established a communal system where everything was shared. However, this approach led to discontent and inefficiency, as hard workers received no more benefit than the less industrious. Recognizing this, Bradford assigned individual plots of land, allowing families to manage their own resources. This shift to private property and free enterprise resulted in increased productivity and prosperity. The pilgrims traded with Native Americans, ultimately leading to their success and the first Thanksgiving, where they gave thanks for their blessings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The story of the pilgrims begins in the early part of 17th century, 1600 for those of you in Rio Linda. The church of England under King James the first was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. The first pilgrims were Christian rebels, folks. Those who challenged king James' ecclesiastical authority and those who believe strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their religious beliefs in England in the 1600. A group of separatists, Christians who didn't wanna buy into the Church of England or living under the live under the rule of King James, fled to Holland and established a community among themselves there for 11 years.
After 11 years, about 40 of them, having heard about this new world Christopher Columbus had discovered, 40 of them decided to to go. 40 of them agreed to make a perilous journey to what was called a new world where they knew they would face hardships. But the reason they did it, so they could live and worship god according to their own beliefs and consciences. On the 1st August 16 20, the Mayflower set sail. 102 passengers, 40 of them pilgrims, now known as pilgrims.
They were led by a man named William Bradford. Now on the journey, William Bradford set up an agreement, a contract that established how they would live once they got there. The contract set forth just and equal laws for all members of the new community irrespective of political or religious beliefs. The revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact are derived straight from the bible. The pilgrims were a devoutly religious people completely steeped in lessons of both the old and new testaments.
Among others, they looked to the ancient Israelites, for examples. And because of the biblical precedents set forth in scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. They believed in god. They believed they were in the hands of God. As you know, it was not a pleasure cruise.
The journey to the new world on a tiny by the day standard ship, sailing ship. It was long. It was arduous. There was sickness. There was seasickness.
It was cold. It was wet. The the the exact opposite of anything you think of today as a cruise on the open ocean. When they landed in New England in November, they found, according to William Bradford's journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote.
There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. There was nothing. The sacrifice they made for freedom was just beginning. During the 1st winter, half of the pilgrims, including William Bradford's own wife died, either starvation, sickness, or exposure.
They endured that first winter. When spring finally came, they had, by that time, met the indigenous peoples, the Indians. And the Indians indeed taught settlers how to plant corn, how to fish, how to skin beavers and other animals for coats, and life improved. But there wasn't any prosperity. They did not yet prosper.
They were still dependent. They were still confused. They were still in a new place, essentially alone among like minded people. Now it's important to understand all this because this is where the modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is explained in a lot of textbooks as a holiday for which the pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives instead of what it really was.
Now that happened. Don't misunderstand. That all happened, but that's not from William Bradford's own journal what they ultimately gave thanks for. Here's the part that's been omitted. This original contract that they made on the Mayflower as they were traveling to the new world, they actually had to enter into that contract with merchant sponsors in London because they had no money on their own.
They needed sponsors, and then they found merchants in London to sponsor them. The merchants in London were making an investment. And as such, the pilgrims agreed that everything they produced would go into a common store or bank, common account. Each member of the community was entitled to one common share in this bank. And out of this, the merchants would be repaid until they were paid off.
All the land that they cleared and all the houses they ultimately built would belong to the community as well. Everything belonged to everybody, and everybody had one share in it. They were gonna distribute everything equally. That was thought to be the epitome of fairness, sharing the hardship, burdens, and all that. Nobody owned anything.
They just had a share in it. It was a commune, essentially. And it was the forerunner of the communes we saw in the sixties seventies, in California and other parts of the country, and it it was complete. They had organic vegetables, by the way. Bradford, who had become the new governor of this colony, recognized that it wasn't working.
It was costly and it was destructive. His own journals chronicle the reasons it didn't work. Bradford assigned a plot of land out to fix this to each family to work and manage as their own. He got rid of the whole commune structure and assigned plots of land to each family to work and manage, and whatever they made, however much they made was theirs. They could sell it.
They could share it. They could keep it, whatever they wanted to do. What really happened, they they turned Louis the power of a free market after enduring months months of hardship, first on the Mayflower and then getting settled and then the failure of the common account from which everybody got there was no incentive for anybody to do anything. And as is human nature, some of the pilgrims are a bunch of lazy twerps and others busted their rear ends. But it didn't matter because even the people that weren't very industrious got the same as everybody else.
And Bradford wrote about how this just wasn't working. What Bradford and his community found, and I'm gonna use his basically his own words, the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else. While most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a 100 years trying to refine it and perfect it and reinvent it, the pilgrims decided early on William Bradford decided to scrap it permanently because it brought out the worst in human nature. It emphasized laziness. It created resentment because in every group of people, you've got your self starters and you've got your hard workers, your indust and you got your lazy twerps and so forth, and there was no difference at the end of the day.
The resentment sprang up on both sides. So Bradford wrote about this. For this community, so far as it was, was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense, without any payment. That was fought injustice.
Why should you work for other people when you can't even work for yourself? What's the point? The pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without any incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They harnessed the power of good, old, free enterprise.
They invoked the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And you know what happened? This had very good success, wrote Bradford, for it made everybody industrious. So as much more corn was planted than would have been.
Is it possible supply side economics could have existed before the 19 eighties? In no time, the pilgrims found they had more food than they could eat themselves. Now this is where it gets really good. If you're laboring under any misconception that I was as I was taught in school, they set up trading posts. They exchanged goods with the Indians.
The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London, and the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and became what became known as the great Puritan migration. The word of the success of the free enterprise, Plymouth Colony spread like wildfire, and that began the great migration. Everybody wanted a part of it. There was no mass slaughtering of the Indians. There was no wiping out of the indigenous people.
And, eventually, in William Bradford's own journal, unleashing the industriousness of all hands ended up producing more than they could ever need themselves. So trading posts began selling and exchanging thing with the and the Indians, by the way, were very helpful. Puritan kids had relationships with the children of the Native Americans that they found. This killing the indigenous people stuff, this this this they're they're talking about much much much later. Has nothing to do with the first thing.
The first Thanksgiving was William Bradford and Plymouth Colony thanking god for their blessings. That's the first Thanksgiving.
reSee.it AI Summary
After Kamala Harris redirected FEMA funds for immigration resettlement, North Carolina faces a crisis without federal aid. Thankfully, local heroes are stepping up, using mules, horses, and goats to deliver essential supplies through tough terrain. True American spirit shines through.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จAfter Kamala Harris diverted FEMA funds to an illegal immigration resettlement agenda, North Carolina is left abandoned in crisis. But patriots step up. With no federal aid, heroic locals bring mules, horses, and goats loaded with supplies, delivering life-saving help through rugged terrain. True American heroes answer the call where FEMA failed.
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed a shocking contrast: a once-thriving landscape has turned into a graveyard, with cars, homes, and bodies buried beneath the river's destruction. Lives have been wiped out by Hurricane Helene, leaving devastation in its wake. Compounding this tragedy is FEMA's gross mismanagement, which has deepened the despair and suffering of those affected.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญโ๐จ๐ง๐๐ ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐๐๐ฉ๐, ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฒ๐๐ซ๐. ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ, ๐ก๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซโ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐, ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐ค๐. ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ , ๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ฌ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐ซ. ๐๐
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จFamilies abandoned to die, begging for help, after Kamala Harris turned FEMA into an illegal immigration resettlement agencyโAmerican lives sacrificed in a shocking betrayal.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris turned FEMA into an illegal alien resettlement agency, which caused Americans in North Carolina to be left to die during a disaster. FEMA's manpower, dollars, resources, and mental energy were spent learning how to get illegal aliens into the country. Therefore, when disaster struck, FEMA was not ready, prepared, capable, or caring.
The speaker claims that helicopters and military assistance were not sent to help American citizens, including babies and children. However, the speaker asserts that if the victims had been living in a foreign country like Haiti or Venezuela, Kamala Harris would have sent help immediately. The speaker describes this as a betrayal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Country has ever seen. The reason why those Americans in North Carolina, those mothers, those fathers, those precious little children were left to die, were left on rooftops, begging, begging their government for help that never came is because Kamala Harris turned FEMA into an illegal alien resettlement agency. Its manpower, its dollars, its resources, its mental energy was spent over the last 4 years learning how to do one thing, how to get illegal aliens from outside the country into your town. And so when disaster struck, they were not ready, they were not prepared, they were not capable, and they did not care. And our fellow citizens, including babies, children, young kids were left to suffer and drown.
They did not scramble the helicopters. They did not scramble the military. They did not send needed assistance. But if those children have been living in a foreign country, they've been living in Haiti or they've been living in Venezuela. Why then, Kamala Harris would have sent in help immediately.
A betrayal like we've never seen before, Sean. This is infuriating.
reSee.it AI Summary
Iโve been reflecting on Kamala Harris's role as Border Czar during what many consider the worst border crisis in U.S. history, with over 10 million illegal immigrants entering since she took office. The Biden-Harris administration reversed Trumpโs border policies, leading to increased costs for taxpayers and challenges for low-skilled American workers. Additionally, there have been reports of unvetted immigrants being flown into U.S. cities and a significant rise in encounters with individuals on terrorist watchlists, raising concerns about national security.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ Kamala Harris has presided over the worst border crisis in U.S. history, with over 10 million illegal immigrants from 180+ countries entering since she became Border Czar. Instead of securing the borders, she reversed Trumpโs effective policies and promoted an open-border agenda. ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฉโ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ On day one, the Biden-Harris administration reversed Trumpโs โRemain in Mexicoโ policy, allowing more than 12,500 asylum seekers into the U.S., sparking an unprecedented border crisis. As a senator, Harris opposed funding for Trumpโs border wall, labeling it โun-Americanโ and blocking crucial border security measures. ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ Harrisโs policies have burdened taxpayers with an estimated $451 billion annually for healthcare, education, and welfare. Her approach has increased unemployment and wage suppression for low-skilled American workers, as confirmed by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL). Facilitating Illegal Immigration Over 320,000 immigrants were flown into U.S. cities, often unvetted, with taxpayer-funded flights, under Harrisโs watch. Testimony from former Chief Patrol Agent Aaron Heitke revealed that $150,000 flights were used to transport illegal immigrants, showcasing Harrisโs active role in enabling the crisis. Concealing the Crisis and Ignoring Terrorist Threats Harrisโs administration ordered border agents to hide encounters with Special Interest Aliens tied to terrorism. The number of terrorist watchlist apprehensions soared to 382 between 2021 and 2024, compared to just 3 in 2019, demonstrating how border security has deteriorated under her leadership.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts the border is secure. They state, "The border is secure," and affirm, "We have a secure border." As president, the speaker pledges to secure the border.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you call the border secure?
Speaker 1: The border is secure.
Speaker 0: You're confident this border is secure?
Speaker 1: We have a secure border. As your president, I will secure our border.
reSee.it AI Summary
A shocking report reveals a cover-up involving Pelosi and Gen. Mark Milley regarding January 6th. It claims Milley ignored Trump's orders to safeguard the Capitol, suggesting a deeper conspiracy aimed at undermining Trump's re-election efforts.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จBOMBSHELL Report EXPOSES January 6th Cover-Up by Pelosi & Gen. Mark Milley | Trump VINDICATED INSIDE JOB: Gen. Mark Milley IGNORED Trump's orders to protect the Capitolโbad optics? Deep State COUP to block Trump's re-election! https://t.co/q1C1I4OIaf
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
AWARD FOR GREATEST MEDIA TROLLING ๐๐คฃ๐๐คฃ https://t.co/EP4DG718wp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Secret Service is investigating who in the Trump campaign knew about a recent service issue. Some people close to Trump were unaware. Trump has a close security team that he trusts and respects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Service issue and to reach out to the Secret Service. But I can tell you this. They have a lot of questions as to who exactly at the Trump campaign knew and when because I have talked to a number of people who've been on the ground with the former president in recent days weeks who had no idea. Now one thing to remember is that Donald Trump is a very tight knit security team. He has been with the same detail for years.
He is very close to them. They have a lot of respect for him, and he has a lot of respect
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
@SpartaJustice https://t.co/pRA3xjMJj0
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฅBombshell: Fauci Knew Hydroxychloroquine Was Effective in China by March 2020, Yet Continued Public Criticism! Explosive Email Reveals Contradictory Stance! https://t.co/qTsoCYD9i2
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฅBombshell: Fauci Knew Hydroxychloroquine Was Effective in China by March 2020, Yet Continued Public Criticism! Explosive Email Reveals Contradictory Stance! https://t.co/qTsoCYD9i2
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฅ MUST-SEEโ #Pfizer and #AstraZeneca: Bribing Doctors, Regulators, and Media in Britain Uncover the extensive corruption infiltrating every sector. This revelation is a must-watch! #vaccine #covid https://t.co/I034LugFij
Video Transcript AI Summary
Between 2020 to 2023, UK HSA and University College London Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust received significant funds from big pharma, notably Pfizer and AstraZeneca. The NHS database reveals doctors involved in consultancy work for big pharma, with MHRA receiving funds from Bill Gates. Media watchdog Ofcom, run by Dame Melanie Dawes, is linked to World Economic Forum. Politicians, including Andrew Mitchell, are questioned for ties to big pharma. Mitchell is seen with Bill Gates and WHO's Tedros Ghebreyesus at Gavi conference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Could possibly recommend such a thing. Well, here's your answer. Between 2020 to 2023, the UK HSA accepted around half a ยฃ1,000,000 from big pharma, a lot of it from Pfizer. And here's the University College London Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, which took over ยฃ1,000,000 from Big Pharma over the COVID years and notably from Pfizer and AstraZeneca. And what are the NHS itself?
You know, delving into the database revealed an absolute horror show of corruption. Here are the 3 opening pages of named doctors involved in consultancy work for big pharma. And here's a page of Abdul's. Now let's take a random Abdul and see what comes up. I'll pick Abdul Jahangir, top right.
There you go. Close to ยฃ4,000 from AstraZeneca. I could go on. There are hundreds of these pages and thousands of doctors' Now Now why doesn't Britain's Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency or MHRA do something about this corruption, you might ask. And the answer is because the MHRA received over ยฃ13,000,000 from Bill Gates over the last few years.
Why doesn't the British media tell you about this medical scandal? Answer, because the BBC, Daily Telegraph, Guardian, etcetera, that the media watchdog, Ofcom, is run by that the media watchdog Ofcom is run by Dame Melanie Dawes, who is firmly in bed with the World Economic Forum, including their countering digital hate censorship vehicle where hate actually means inconvenient truth. And Melanie Dawes, of course, was behind the removal of genuine truth teller Mark Stein from GB News. So why doesn't the British government do something about our corrupt health industry? You might ask.
And the answer sadly, is that most of the politicians may well be may well be deeply corrupt as well. I mean, look at them here scurrying out of the House of Commons when the brave and honorable MP Andrew Bridgen stood to talk about vaccine damage. Take note of the white haired chap whose skedaddles bent almost double after instructing other MPs to leave the floor.
Speaker 1: Andrew Breggent. Mister deputy speaker, on 13th December last year, I was kindly granted an adjournment debate on the potential harms that emergency use experimental mRNA COVID 19 vaccines cause. It's fair to say that night, my life changed.
Speaker 0: What a truly disgusting shower these politicians are, and one wonders how many of them are on big pharma's payroll. And the skedaddling MP, by the way, is the right honorable Andrew Mitchell. Right. Right. Honorable.
What a perverse description that is. And here he is with vaccine billionaire Bill Gates and here again with Bill Gates at a Gavi conference. And Gavi, incidentally, is the Gates funded vaccine alliance, a public private organization which pretty much controls global vaccines alongside the World Health Organization. And here is the right honorable Andrew Mitchell with WHO head honcho Tedros Ghebreyesus.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐จ BREAKING: US military, not Pfizer/Moderna, was the origin of mRNA vaccines. DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) invested in gene-encoded vaccines since 2012 to pursue a bioweapon and vaccine. https://t.co/1iUQUS8Kbr
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2012, DARPA initiated the ADEPT Protect P3 program for pandemic prevention using gene-encoded vaccines. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since then, not just in response to COVID-19. The rapid development of vaccines under Operation Warp Speed was part of a long-term military program. The FDA's lack of control over the process is due to its military origins. The military approach to vaccine development leaves no one exempt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2012, DARPA, which is the research division of the military, started a program. It's called the ADEPT Protect P3 program, pandemic prevention platform. Look what they proposed. They said, listen, we are going to use gene encoded vaccines as a new category of preventive measures based on RNA or DNA. And in this approach, we will stop a pandemic within 60 days.
Within 60 days in 2012, this was started. When President Trump came out and said his operation warp speed and they're gonna develop vaccines, it would have been nice if he was prepped or Anthony Fauci was prepped to say, listen. We're working on this. We've been working on this since 2012. This is not new.
This isn't warp speed. This is 10 years in coming. The deception out in the open that this was rapidly developed, that there was all this stunning innovation. The contractors, Moderna got its first multimillion $1,000,000 contract in 2013. The military works on programs, both the threat SARS CoV 2 and work on the answer, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines.
But the military has biological threat programs. There's one for smallpox monkeypox. There's one for anthrax, and who knows how many more programs. This was part of a program, but the military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, not operation warp speed. It wasn't in response to what was, you know, came out of Wuhan, China.
This is a military. When it was announced by health and human services, Alex Azar and the Department of Defense, that's who entered into this, you know, ushered us into the vaccine era. The military emergency use authorization is a mechanism to get rapid new technology into the military. It's not a mechanism for the public. Its first application broadly to the public was when the COVID-nineteen pandemic.
That's the reason why the FDA doesn't seem like they have any ownership over this. They can't seem to respond to it because it's a military program. This has a military origin to it. And the program is executed like a military program. No one will be spared.
There's no exceptions. You can kinda see that the similarities there.
@SageListener - Steven Miller, MD, PhD
๐ฅBOMBSHELL: Rep. Chip Roy states the US Govt and Fauci lied about vaccine efficacy and forced mandates, affecting 2/3 of US workers. Over 1 Million injuries reported to the government. https://t.co/DkfEXwZRfu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over a 100,000,000 Americans were forced to take a vaccine with a veiled threat, your job or the jab. Regardless of what radical progressive Democrats wanna claim, these vaccines were not voluntary. The federal government mandated vaccines for military personnel, health care workers, government contractors, and all businesses with more than a 100 workers. The Biden administration bragged that their mandates covered more than 2 thirds of American workers. The government lied about its efficacy and effectiveness to make these mandates more palatable.
Doctor Fauci said it is as simple as black and white. You're vaccinated, you're safe, you're unvaccinated, you're at risk. Simple as that. Not sure the truth has borne that out. Former CDC director, Rochelle Walensky said the following, our data from the CDC today suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick.
They teased the prospect of freedom if we would just suck it up and do what they said. How did that work out? They were dead wrong and instead we got one of the biggest bait and switches of all time. We decided to inject 700,000,000 people with vaccines regardless of the risk COVID 19 poses to them. Here's the aftermath.
A 1,000,000 adverse events from the COVID 19 countermeasures have been reported to the government, only 11 have been compensated. While Big Pharma enjoys complete immunity from liability stemming from COVID 19 vaccine injury.
