TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Sajwani
@Sajwani - حسن سجواني 🇦🇪 Hassan Sajwani
I still cannot forget this 🤣 https://t.co/yCVCCNQ8HI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss hate speech and content moderation on Twitter, as well as COVID misinformation policies and broader editorial questions.
- Speaker 0 says they have spoken with people who were sacked and with people recently involved in moderation, and they claim there is not enough staff to police hate speech in the company.
- Speaker 1 asks if there is a rise in hate speech on Twitter and prompts for personal experience.
- Speaker 0 says, personally, they see more hateful content in their feed, but they do not use the For You feed for the rest of Twitter. They describe the content as something that solicits a reaction and may include something slightly racist or slightly sexist.
- Speaker 1 asks for a concrete example of hateful content. Speaker 0 says they cannot name a single example, explaining they have not used the For You feed for the last three or four weeks and have been using Twitter since the takeover for the last six months. When pressed again, Speaker 0 says they cannot identify a specific example but that many organizations say such information is on the rise. Speaker 1 again pushes for a single example, and Speaker 0 repeats they cannot provide one.
- Speaker 1 points out the inconsistency, noting that Speaker 0 claimed more hateful content but cannot name a single tweet as an example. Speaker 0 responds that they have not looked at that feed recently, and that the last few weeks they saw it but cannot provide an exact example.
- The discussion moves to COVID misinformation: Speaker 1 asks about changes to COVID misinformation rules and labels. Speaker 0 clarifies that the BBC does not set the rules on Twitter and asks about changes to the labels for COVID misinformation, noting there used to be a policy that disappeared.
- Speaker 1 questions why the labels disappeared and asks whether COVID is no longer an issue, and whether the BBC bears responsibility for misinformation regarding masking, vaccination side effects, and not reporting on that, as well as whether the BBC was pressured by the British government to change editorial policy. Speaker 0 states that this interview is not about the BBC and emphasizes that they are not a representative of the BBC’s editorial policy, and tries to shift to another topic.
- Speaker 1 continues pushing, and Speaker 0 indicates the interview is moving to another topic. Speaker 1 remarks that Speaker 0 wasn’t expecting that, and Speaker 0 suggests discussing something else.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, I would I would only just add that, you know, we have spoken to people who who have been sacked that used to be in content moderation. And and and we've spoken to people very recently who were involved in moderation, and they just say they just there's not enough people to police this stuff, particularly around particularly around hate speech in the company. Do is that something
Speaker 1: you wanna talk about? I mean, you use Twitter. Right. Do you see a rise in hate speech? I mean But just a personal anecdote.
Like, what did you I don't.
Speaker 0: Personally, my for you, I would see I get I get more of that kind of content. Yeah. Personally. But I I'm not gonna talk to talk to the rest of for for the rest of Twitter. You see
Speaker 1: more hate speech personally?
Speaker 0: I would say I would see more hateful content in that in that.
Speaker 1: Content you don't like or or hateful? What do mean to describe a hateful thing?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, you know, just content that will solicit a reaction, something that may include something that is slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of those kinds of things.
Speaker 1: So you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned?
Speaker 0: I no. Is that what you're saying? I'm not saying anything. I'm saying Well, I'm
Speaker 1: just curious what you I'm I'm trying to understand what you mean by hateful con content. I'm asking for specific examples. And if and you just said that if something is slightly sexist, that's hateful content. Does that mean that it should be banned?
Speaker 0: Well, you've asked me you've asked me whether my feed, whether it's got less or more. It I'd say it's got slightly more.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm asking for examples. Can you can you name one example?
Speaker 0: I'd I'd honestly don't I I honestly You can't name a single example. I'll tell you why, because I don't actually use that for you feed anymore because I I just don't particularly like it.
Speaker 1: But you said lot of people
Speaker 0: a lot of people quite similar. I I I only Well, hang on a second.
Speaker 1: You said you've seen more hateful content, but you can't name a single example, not even one.
Speaker 0: I'm not sure I've used that feed for the last three or four weeks. And I
Speaker 1: I Well, then how did you see the hateful content content?
Speaker 0: Because I've been I've been using I've been using Twister since you've taken over for the last six months.
Speaker 1: Okay. So then you must have at some point seen that you for you hateful content. I'm asking for one example.
Speaker 0: Right. And I
Speaker 1: You can't give us a
Speaker 0: go on. And and and I'm saying
Speaker 1: I I Then I I say so that you don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 0: Really?
Speaker 1: Because you can't give me a single example of hateful con content, not even one tweet, and yet you claimed that the hateful content was high. Well
Speaker 0: That's a false. No. What I claimed lied. What no. No.
What I claimed was there are many organizations that say that that kind of information is on the rise. Now whether whether it has a Give me one example. I mean, right. And you can't even like the the strategic dialogue the in The UK. They will say that.
Speaker 1: So you Look. As people will say all sorts of nonsense. I'm literally asking for a single example, and you can't name one.
Speaker 0: Right. And as as I already said, I don't use that feed. But let's But how would you know that you I don't think this is getting any laugh.
Speaker 1: Literally said you experienced more hateful content and then couldn't name a single example.
Speaker 0: Right. And as I said, I haven't That's absurd. I haven't I haven't actually looked at that feed.
Speaker 1: Was just trying see hateful content?
Speaker 0: Because I'm saying that's what I saw a few weeks ago. I can't give you an exact example. Let's move on. We have we only have a certain amount of time. Well COVID misinformation.
You changed the you changed the COVID misinformation rules.
Speaker 1: BBC changes COVID misinformation?
Speaker 0: The BBC does not set the rules on Twitter, so I'm asking you.
Speaker 1: No. I'm talking about the BBC's most information about COVID.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm just asking you about you changed the labels, the COVID misinformation labels. There used to be a policy and then it then disappeared. Why do that?
Speaker 1: Well, COVID is no longer an issue. Does the BBC hold itself at all responsible for misinformation re re regarding masking and and side effects of vaccinations and not reporting on that at all? And what about the fact that the BBC was put under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy? Are you aware of that?
Speaker 0: This is an this is not an interview about the BBC.
Speaker 1: Oh, you thought it wasn't?
Speaker 0: And this see now why you've done Twitter spaces. I am not a representative of the BBC's editorial policy. I wanna make that clear. Let's talk about something else. I'm interviewing you too.
Alright. Let's let's let's talk about let's talk about something else.
Speaker 1: You weren't expecting that.
Speaker 0: Let's talk about something
@HSajwanization - حسن سجواني 🇦🇪 Hassan Sajwani
In 2014, NASA awarded Boeing and SpaceX with projects to build commercial crew space vehicles: - Boeing got $4.2 billion to build Starliner. - SpaceX got $2.6 billion to build Crew Dragon. Who’s winning so far ? And why ? Listen to @friedberg & @chamath https://t.co/41eajeXNar
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2010, NASA contracted both Boeing and SpaceX to develop space capsules for transport to the ISS. Boeing received $4.2 billion for the Starliner, while SpaceX received $2.6 billion for the Crew Dragon. The Crew Dragon has since flown 13 missions to the ISS, while the Starliner has faced numerous delays and setbacks.
Originally slated for a 2017 launch, the Starliner encountered design problems, propellant leaks, a failed parachute test, and software errors. Its first uncrewed test flight in 2019 was plagued by software issues. A 2021 launch was aborted due to propulsion system valve issues. A successful uncrewed flight occurred in May 2022, but a parachute failed upon return. The first crewed launch finally occurred in June 2024 with two astronauts.
During the flight, five of 28 maneuvering thrusters malfunctioned, and five helium leaks were discovered. NASA has delayed approving the capsule for return until the issues are understood, potentially pushing the decision to August. Some suggest Boeing's problems stem from prioritizing earnings over safety, and that competition in the free market allowed a more capable and cheaper solution to emerge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back. So I just wanna talk a little bit about the history of this project and provide a little context before we highlight the the particularly acute story of two astronauts being stuck in space right now, which is an incredible story. So this is a next gen space capsule that was designed to take people to and from lower Earth orbit, basically to the ISS. And NASA, if you guys remember in the February, decided to stop making their own vessels, and they're gonna start using third party contractors. So they went out and had a competitive bidding process.
And ultimately, in 2010, they gave both SpaceX and Boeing the winning contracts to develop these commercial crew transportation capabilities. SpaceX obviously developed the Crew Dragon capsule. So it was unveiled in 2010 as the CST 100, Boeing's first commercially developed space capsule. The company would take on all the financial risk for developing it with a fixed price contract from NASA of $4,200,000,000. To date, by the way, Boeing has taken a $1,600,000,000 financial hit on the development of this program.
SpaceX, by the way, won a $2,600,000,000 contract to develop the Crew Dragon capsule. And just to give you guys a sense, the Crew Dragon capsule has flown 13 missions thus far to the ISS, and this was the first crewed mission flown by Boeing, both of which got contracts at the same time. So originally, it was gonna be a 2017 launch timeline. And I just wanna hit on some of the history of the Starliner problems. 2016, it was delayed
Speaker 1: You said just to confirm, you said it was $4,200,000,000, that contract.
Speaker 0: That contract with Boeing to develop this Starliner capsule. So the first issues arose in 2016 when there were design problems. The first crewed flight was then pushed back to be scheduled for 2019. In 2018, they found issues with propellant leaks, which led to more delays. 2019, a test flight parachute failed.
December of twenty nineteen, they had their first uncrewed test flight, and there were software errors that would have caused destruction of the spacecraft. This led to NASA and Boeing submitting 80 different changes that needed to happen before they did their next uncrewed test flight. So they then pushed that all the way out to 2021. Boeing ended up saying it cost us half a billion dollars to do that. Then in August of twenty twenty one, 13 propulsion system valve issues were discovered on the launch pad.
The flight was aborted, and the capsule was returned. They eventually got it up again in space in May of twenty twenty two and a dock with the ISS, and it returned back to Earth. Even though one of the parachutes failed when it returned to Earth, it still made it down. This again led to the 2023 first crewed launch, which means people are in the capsule. This is originally supposed to be in 2017, and they kept pushing it back because of more issues of the parachute system.
And then they finally got it launched in June fifth of twenty twenty four with two astronauts on board to go to ISS and come back. On the way, they discovered that five out of the 28 maneuvering thrusters, which is how they can move this capsule through space to get it to dock with the ISS and ultimately make its way back to Earth, were malfunctioning. They have now discovered five helium leaks. Helium is stored in a pressurized system to actually control those thrusters and make it move through space, and now they may not even be able to get this capsule to fly off of the ISS. So on June 28, NASA announced that while the Starliner is theoretically capable of returning the astronauts to Earth in an emergency on the ISS, The capsule is not approved to fly until these thruster issues and the leaking helium are figured out or better understood, and they have now pushed the decision to the August.
It would be massively embarrassing for Boeing if these two astronauts had to be rescued by SpaceX. It's a Crew Dragon capsule had to find its way up to the ISS. They hopped on, they came back to Earth. Clearly a massive problem, but it's certainly a personal and a human story now with these two astronauts struck stuck on the ISS. Then to come up, you've had a lot of comments on Boeing in the past.
But, I mean, does this feel like like a continued underscoring of the issues at Boeing?
Speaker 1: And and just to be clear, Chamath, the the statistics are three for Starliner, two unmanned, one manned. And then for, SpaceX with the Dragon, they did eleven eight with NASA three with commercial commercially with, like, other passengers. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So the NASA Cargo Dragon, which only has a cargo on it, not people, has completed nine successful missions to and from the ISS. There are six more planned, and they've obviously done 13 missions, with the Crew Dragon. And by the way, I don't know if you guys know this, this is a surprise, but exciting to share that we are gonna have a Crew Dragon capsule from SpaceX at the All In Summit in LA parked on the launch. You can actually go inside and check it out and take a little tour.
It's gonna be amazing. So thank you to the SpaceX team for bringing the crew Dragon capsule. Chamath?
Speaker 2: Chamath. My gosh. I mean, where do I begin? Look. Boeing is these three very complicated businesses that try to live as one.
So you have a commercial airline business, you have a defense business, and you have the space business. I'll be the first one to say that I think it's extremely difficult to be good at any one of those three things. And the probability of getting all of those three things right is basically next to impossible. That's just a general comment. And I think that specialization is better.
The second thing that I'll say is that I observed this company about five years ago, and I wrote about it in my annual letter. And part of the reason why I wrote about it was there was a quote. I'll never be able to judge what motivated Dennis Muilenberger, whether it was a stock price that was going to continue to go up and up or whether it was just beating the other guy to the next rate increase, he said. He added later, if anybody ran over the rainbow for a pot of gold on stock, it would have been his. Who do you think said this?
It was the incoming CEO of Boeing. And I was so flabbergasted because I'd never seen something like this. So in a company where safety has to be the number one priority, to have an individual that's characterized by the incoming CEO as solely focused on their compensation plan sort of explains why there's all these fissures in this company. Because again, back to that famous Charlie Munger quote, show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome. If the incentive is safety and world class engineering, that's what you'll get.
But if the incentive is earnings per share growth, then that's what you will also get. And Boeing was a darling of the stock market for a very long time. And now what happens is underneath the other things that actually should matter, I. E. Safety are slightly deprioritized and then you have these issues.
I really hope these two people get back safe. It seems like they're doing a lot of experiments and they love being up there, but it's a little bit unacceptable that they have to be there until February. But I do trust that if Elon has to go and get them, SpaceX will do a great job, and they'll be home safely.
Speaker 1: Sacks, one of the great things about this. Thank God NASA gave two contracts out of they had given one.
Speaker 2: You know? Oh my god. Could you imagine? If that was lobbying
Speaker 1: and asking the Russians to go get them. And then, like, we're in a little I don't know if you've been watching this. Is what I thought we could discuss.
Speaker 0: It's like, is there benefit in everything?
Speaker 1: Being dependent on Putin at this moment in time when Ukraine is making massive gains into Russian territory. I know this hasn't come up all that much, but that would be really dangerous.
Speaker 0: But by
Speaker 2: the way, just back to what Friedberg said before, sorry to interrupt you before you go, Sax. But why is this even possible? It's exactly as you said, J. Cal, we have competition. But why is competition possible?
It's because of what Friedberg talked about before. We didn't have a set price. The government didn't come and say, you will build it for X and I'm only doing it one time. The free market was able to solve this problem. And it turned out the more capable solution was 40% cheaper than the one that they thought was going to work.
And the one that was 40% cheaper was also on time. And the other one was unreliable. And this other one seven, eight, nine, ten years delayed. It's 100%,
Speaker 0: Shama. That's a perfect
Speaker 2: example of every day of the fact that these other ideas just don't work.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think we've pretty much beaten that capitalism is the greatest force for innovation and lowering prices. Sachs, your thoughts on this
Speaker 0: situation? Humanity. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. God forbid, people will get air
@HSajwanization - حسن سجواني 🇦🇪 Hassan Sajwani
I truly don’t have enough words to thank President Trump for showing respect and appreciation for my President Sheikh Mohamed We were honored by his visit to the UAE 🇦🇪 https://t.co/tV9yUzY4bE
@HSajwanization - حسن سجواني 🇦🇪 Hassan Sajwani
BREAKING: Houthis say “our operation in the international waters were for defensive purposes only, and we announce an immediate ceasefire” BRUUUHH …. 😳😨🤣 🤣🤣👏🏼 https://t.co/NFhHILfD9t
@HSajwanization - حسن سجواني 🇦🇪 Hassan Sajwani
The UAE 🇦🇪 warned back in 2017 … and today is that day !! @lalshareef https://t.co/sbeDRUwKsB
Video Transcript AI Summary
There will be an increase in radical extremists and terrorists from Europe due to their indecisiveness and political correctness. They falsely believe they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do. This is a dangerous assumption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, and and let me say this in English so you can understand what I'm saying. I have translation. No. I know you have translation, but I'm I just want to make sure you get it right. There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremist and terrorists Coming out of Europe because of lack of decision making, trying to be politically correct, Or assuming that they know the Middle East, and they know Islam, and they know the others far better than we do.
And I'm I'm sorry, but that's pure