TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SaltyGirl09
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
The Rothschild's and The Federal Reserve. https://t.co/Y6atp2PfSS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes Lord Evelyn Rothschild as extraordinarily rich and powerful, claiming that historically the Rothschild wealth was hidden in underground vaults and that their secret financial records were never audited or accounted for. He asserts researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000, more than half the wealth of the entire world, noting possessions such as castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses, and exotic resorts, and that the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the eighteen hundreds, which then bought the Associated Press. He claims they have controlling interest in three major television networks and can easily avoid media tangents since they own it. He says they owned and operated Englandβs Royal Mint, continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct, and control the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association), where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily, earning millions weekly on transaction fees. He asserts they fix the world price of gold daily and profit from its ups and downs, and over centuries have amassed trillions in gold bullion in subterranean vaults, cornering the worldβs gold supply. He claims they own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in The Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. He mentions Alba Lynn Rothschild as looking like a harmless gray-haired old man, but says to βmake no mistake about it.β He concludes that Rothschilds and their ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment of millions, and that the wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on earth.
Speaker 1 reframes the Rothschilds as the head of the snake, locating their headquarters within a one-mile square in the City of London as the center of their banking dynasty that owns money supplied through central banks of almost every nation. He recalls a November 1910 secret meeting on Jekyll Island among seven of the worldβs richest Jewish men to establish a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank, naming Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip (representing the Rockefeller financial empire), Henry P. Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong (representing JP Morgan), and Paul Warburg (representing the Rothschild dynasty of Europe). He mentions powerful men who opposed the Federal Reserve, including Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor, who reportedly died in the Titanic sinking. He states that by April 1912 opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated, and on 12/23/1913 the president signed a bill establishing the privately owned Federal Reserve System in the United States. He quotes Woodrow Wilson: βIβm a most unhappy man. Iβve unwittingly ruined my country,β and notes that a great industrial nation became controlled by its system of credit, with growth in the hands of a few men. He claims Jewish bankers and rabbis celebrated the Federal Reserve Act, and quotes Charles August Lindbergh criticizing the system as private, for profit, and not federal or reserves, with debt-based finance. He asserts that the Fed system enslaves to protect its monopoly over credit and that the Fedβs money-creating tricks enable big brother government to borrow endlessly; the Fed is controlled by Jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff, and that every Federal Reserve chairman since 1980 has been Jewish (Burns, Volker, Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen). He claims the βhouse of Rothschildβ owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank.
Speaker 2 asks about the proper relationship between a Fed chairman and a U.S. president.
Speaker 3 states that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, meaning there is no other government agency overrule actions taken.
Speaker 1 quotes Harold Grellis Rosenthal: βour power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system,β asserting that the Federal Reserve System is owned by βusβ even though the name implies a government institution. He alleges a long-standing plan to confiscate gold and silver and replace them with worthless paper, claiming Jews promoted both sides of issues while the goyim fail to see who is behind the scenes, and accusing Jews of parasitically consuming production while producers receive less.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just how rich and powerful is Lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschild's secret financial records were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled, but researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000 more than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses, and exotic resorts, the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the eighteen hundreds.
Reuters then bought the Associated Press, which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world day after day. They have controlling interest in three major television networks and easily avoid media tangents since they own it. Until recently, they owned and operated England's Royal Mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily. The Rothschilds earn millions weekly just on transaction fees alone.
They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs. Over the centuries, the Rothschilds have amassed trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world's largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in The Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, holding companies. Although, Alba Lynn Rothschild looks like a harmless gray haired old man, make no mistake about it.
Rothschild and his ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of millions. The wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on earth.
Speaker 1: The Rothschilds is the head of the snake. Within the city of London, there is a one mile square that is referred to as the city. This is the headquarters of the Jewish family Rothschild's banking dynasty that owns the money supplied through the central banks of almost every nation on Earth. In November 1910, seven of the world's richest Jewish men held a secret meeting on Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia to establish a central bank, which they called the Federal Reserve Bank. These men were Nelson Altrich and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller Financial Empire.
Henry Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong, representing JP Morgan, and Paul Warburg, representing the Rothschild banking dynasty of Europe. There were some powerful men who made abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve System. Their total wealth today would be worth nearly $11,000,000,000. These were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Bastor. Unfortunately, all of them were on board Titanic when it sank to the depths of the sea.
All three died that night. By April 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve had been eliminated. On 12/23/1913, after many senators and congressmen had left town for Christmas, the president Wilson signed a bill, and the privately owned Federal Reserve System came into being in The United States. After Woodrow Wilson had signed the Federal Reserve Act, which gave private interest control over economic power in 1913, he said, I'm a most unhappy man. I've unwittingly ruined my country.
A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion endures of a small group of dominant men.
Jewish bankers and their rabbis actually celebrated the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. After the Federal Reserve was up and running, Charles August Lindbergh added, The financial system has been turned over to Federal Reserve Board. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits for the use of other people's money. The Federal Reserve System was neither federal nor does it contain reserves, and nor is it part of a decentralized system. The adoption of the debt based financial system breached by Marx in the Commons Manifesto had been accomplished.
The current banking system, fractional reserve banking, enables privately owned banks to create money out of thin air. Money today is simply numbers in a computer system with only about 3% existing as physical currency. Through its control and monopoly of our money, the elite that own the Federal Reserve now have total control over other banks, corporations, money, and politicians. The Fed system is designed to enslave us to never ending debt and to fool us to believe that our money has any real value when it is, in fact, worthless, created out of thin air, based on debt, and backed by nothing. It must enslave humanity to protect its monopoly over credit.
Its money creating tricks enabled big brother government to borrow endless money from the Fed. The Fed were now controlled by the Jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff. Every Federal Reserve chairman since 1980 has been Jewish, Burns, Volker, Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yalen. The house of Rothschild owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank.
Speaker 2: What is the proper relationship? What should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of The United States?
Speaker 3: Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically that there is no eight other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.
Speaker 1: The Jew, Harold Grellis Rosenthal, explained, our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system. The Federal Reserve System fitted our plan nicely since it is owned by us, but the name implies that it's a government institution. From the very outset, our purpose was to confiscate all the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless nonredeemable paper mills. We, Jews, had put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eyes fixed on the issue, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We Jews glory in the fact that the stupid goy have never realized that we are the parasites consuming an increasing portion of production while the producers are continually receiving less and less.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Color me shocked.. The founder of The Church of Satan was Jewish. https://t.co/p0ITn9Fwe2
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
White tolerance is coming to an end. https://t.co/lhug3QkwsT
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Why do we continue to tolerate this behavior? https://t.co/2bzinjEOUp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states someone hit them and another person, and they don't care if the perpetrator goes to prison. They tell the person not to touch the other person again and to leave. The speaker then says "thank you, sir."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You hit me and her. I don't give a fuck. You could go to prison. Okay. Then I'm going back to me.
Do not touch her again. Go the fuck. Whatever. What? Please.
Bounce. What the fuck ever. Shit. Thank you, sir.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
The New George Floyd has arrived. This is absolutely vile and disgusting. Karmelo Anthony is now selling T-shirts featuring his face, and His family and friends are promoting these "FreeMelo" shirts. https://t.co/aMYImywvTc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tweet a tapping in. If you fuck with me or my music, you gotta fuck with Carmelo, man. This is for my dog. Website coming soon. You gotta tap in.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you know what it is. Tweet a tapping in. Anybody who fuck with me, fuck with my music, you gotta fuck with Carmelo and it, man. Just was for my dog. Website coming soon.
You gotta tap in, man. Yeah.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across leaked audio where the AIPAC CEO boasts about the organization's influence over Trump's National Security officials, including Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe, and Mike Waltz. It raises concerns about the extent of foreign influence in American politics.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Leaked audio: AIPAC CEO brags about the influence AIPAC has over Trumps National Security officials such as Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe, and Mike Waltz. America is occupied by Israel
Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House has to be responsive to Congress. The speaker discusses working with Democratic allies to pressure the administration. The speaker also mentions appointees to top-level positions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We may not lobby the executive, but as we were talking about what was the discussion earlier about congress being representative to the people world, the White House has to be responsive to congress. And so it's working with, at the time, our friends on the Democratic side of the aisle to apply pressure the way that they know how to administration as it will be with this administration. I was talking about the people who will get appointed to do some of these jobs. If we look at the top level, we can
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
FULL Leaked audio: AIPAC CEO brags about the influence AIPAC has over Trumps National Security officials such as Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe, and Mike Waltz. America is occupied by Israel Source https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCEXR8pRTkE2vFeJePNe9UcQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House must be responsive to Congress, requiring collaboration to apply pressure. Investing in strong partners like Israel ensures American service members aren't on the front lines.
There's concern about Congress slowing executive action, recalling holds on military sales during the Trump administration. This isn't always about Israel, but about congressional versus legislative power struggles. Supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship need to be wary of this dynamic. Forcing votes on resolutions of disapproval isn't good for the U.S.-Israel relationship.
In the future, AI could shape perceptions of the U.S.-Israel relationship based on current online information. Countering negative narratives in the information sphere is crucial, especially as informational criteria starts in academia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We may not lobby the executive, but as we were talking about this discussion earlier about congress being representatives of the people world, the White House has to be responsive to congress. And so it's working with the time, our friends on the Democratic side the aisle to apply pressure the way that they know how to an administration as it will be with this administration. Bob was talking about the people who will get appointed to do some of these jobs. If we look at the top level, we can talk
Speaker 1: if Americans because the criticism the question is, you know, American criticism from the right and left, one thing that you hear that I think is common on the far right and the far left is that they don't want a young men men American men and women in service members in four wars in the police or anywhere. So the way it does not have young Americans on the line anywhere is to actually invest in strong partners who can defend themselves. That's Israel. So I am very I have watched the congressional machine learn the muscle memory of how to slow down executive action now because I was on the hill during the first Trump administration. So what worries me is we talked a lot about the importance of bipartisan support.
And in the first Trump administration, you all may remember that so different members of congress for different reasons can put holds on proposed military sales January 20 happened and before February, he said, you know, there had been an override of this. What I worry about that I think we just everyone who's a supporter of this relationship needs to be wary of the manner in which sometimes it's not going to be about Israel. It's going to be about congressional versus legislative tumbling, but it's what's gonna be taught in the process. And I'm worried about that in the executive polls. I'm worried about it with things like the standards, joint resolution of disapproval.
Even if he doesn't force a vote at any time, we're not getting the point here about enforcing a vote, and it is not good for Israel and the president's relationship to make members conflict have to vote on it. Even
Speaker 2: Imagine five years from now a staff, a congressional staff types into a quad, GBT, I don't want deal with GBT 14, whatever, right? Says, Is supporting Israel bad for American national security? The answer that they get back is going to be informed by the information that's on the internet today, which is why punching back in the information sphere becomes so important. I would argue exactly the law papers, because when you disengage, Right? So that informational criteria starts in academia for a dozen.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://thegrayzone.com/2025/04/09/aipac-access-trump-natsec-officials-leaked/
AIPAC leader boasts of special βaccessβ to top Trump natsec officials in leaked audio - The Grayzone
During an off-the-record panel, AIPACβs CEO detailed his organization's grooming of Trumpβs top national security officials, and how his group's βaccessβ ensures they continue to follow Israelβs agenda. https://youtu.be/pHo7hyEczg0 The Grayzone has obtained audio of an off-the-record session from the 2025 Congressional Summit of AIPAC, the main US lobbying arm of the state of Israel.
thegrayzone.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Taking the lives of White children is their new reparations. Unbelievable π€― https://t.co/IbH0NIWl73
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Did you know that 4,000 Jews were warned NOT TO GO TO WORK on September 11, 2001? https://t.co/4PjZ993NXX
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Jerusalem Post article reported that the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem received names of 4,000 Israelis believed to be in the area of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks, based on calls from concerned families. However, only three or four Israelis reportedly died.
An Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo allegedly sent a warning two hours before the attacks, advising people not to go to the World Trade Center due to an impending catastrophe. The company's vice president stated the prediction's timing was exact. The message, sent in Hebrew via a buddy system, was reportedly receivable on various platforms like Blackberry and cell phones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were reported to have been at the World Trade Center that day. It it's a this is a Jerusalem Post article, and it says that the foreign ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the area of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack. Now that's how many people called in. How many families called in and said, I'm worried about Shalom. I'm worried about this guy.
I'm worried about that guy. My son is there. My husband is there. But what happened of of those 4,000 people who were supposedly there, only three or four died. Three or four Israelis died in the whole operation.
Well, how did they, you know, how did how did they avoid harm? Well, what what clearly happened also is that there was an instant messaging service called Odigo, an Israeli instant messaging service, that sent out a warning two hours before 09:11 happened, warning people not to go to the World Trade Center that day cause there would be a catastrophe there. And the the vice president of the company said that the the prediction, the time was exact to the minute. So 08:45. Right?
And the message was sent out on a platform that you could receive through your Black berry or your Blueberry or your cell phone or your Internet, whatever. And so all platforms. But it was sent out in Hebrew, and it was sent out using a buddy system where you can say, I'm gonna send this message to
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Did you know? Jews introduce legislation to throw Christians βοΈ in prison for up to 2 years for mentioning Jesus in Israel. Let this sink in. https://t.co/UQQ8yA1f00
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two ultra-orthodox members of Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition introduced a bill that would criminalize sharing the gospel of Jesus in Israel, punishable by up to two years in prison. The bill, introduced by Moshe Gaffney and Yakov Asher, would make it illegal to share religious beliefs in conversation, online, in print, or by mail, specifically targeting Christians.
Joel Rosenberg, a Jewish follower of Jesus, stated that while theological differences exist, evangelical Christians have strongly supported Israel, and this bill would stifle freedom of speech.
Netanyahu, a friend to evangelicals, believes in protecting freedom of speech and Israel's Christian community. The bill could cause conflict with the millions of evangelicals worldwide. A similar bill introduced by Gaffney in 1999 failed, but United Torah Judaism holds more power now, potentially impacting Netanyahu's coalition and leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Conservative Christian leaders are calling on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop a bill proposed by members of his coalition to make it criminal to tell people about Jesus in Israel. Our Jerusalem Correspondent Daniel Cohen is live near Tel Aviv with more. Good morning, Daniel.
Speaker 1: Good morning, Allison. Good morning, everyone. A big story just before days before Palm Sunday, Good Friday, and Easter, sacred time for Christians. Two ultra orthodox members of prime minister Netanyahu's coalition have introduced a bill that would punish believers for sharing the gospel of Jesus with prison time. United Torah Judaism Knesset members Moshe Gaffney and Yakov Asher introduced legislation last week making it illegal to share in conversation or produce content online, in print, or by mail.
Their explanation of the bill emphasizes a warning to stop Christians in particular. The punishment, one year in prison or two years for sharing with someone under the age of 18. Joel Rosenberg is the host of the Rosenberg Report and editor in chief of All Israel News. He's also a Jewish follower of Jesus.
Speaker 2: Obviously, Jewish people don't agree with Christians, evangelicals or others about who Jesus is. Right? We all know that there's a theological difference, but evangelical Christians and and other Christians have been so supportive of Israel and the Jewish people. So to silence, to muzzle, and gag even Israelis like myself and others to say, you can't talk to another person about your faith and why you believe it, that is terrible. That is not freedom.
Speaker 1: Although he doesn't agree theologically, Netanyahu has always been a strong friend of evangelicals, speaking at meetings and believing freedom of speech and freedom for Israel's small Christian community, should be protected. Now should this bill gain traction, it could spark a serious clash with the 60,000,000 evangelicals in The United States and 600,000,000 around the world. Gaffney first introduced a ban on evangelism in 1999. It went nowhere. United Torah Judaism is in a stronger negotiating position now, though, since Netanyahu needs to keep the party in his coalition, or it could threaten Netanyahu's ability to remain in power.
Allison, back to you.
Speaker 0: Danielle Cohen, thank you so much.
reSee.it AI Summary
I welcome you to the discussion on the evolving situation in Ukraine, which some are likening to a new Israel. Recently, over 14,000 Jewish immigrants arrived in Uman, sparking conversations about Ukraine's potential role in global Jewish identity. The Balfour Declaration 2.0 was signed in January 2025, securing land for a greater Israel project. Additionally, connections between influential figures like George Soros and Ukraine's history are being explored, alongside the implications of Ukraine's digital identity initiatives.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Welcome to the Balfour Declaration 2.0 Ukraine is turning into the new Israel. Jews flooded the streets of Amsterdam, chanting, "We will rape white women and drink your blood". Thread π§΅
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Over 14,000 Jewish immigrants from Israel and across other parts of the world arrived in the small city of Uman, in Ukraine this month.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/zelenskyy-wants-ukraine-to-be-a-big-israel-heres-a-road-map/
Zelenskyy wants Ukraine to be βa big Israel.β Hereβs a road map.
By adapting their mindset to mirror aspects of Israelβs approach to security challenges, Ukrainian officials can tackle their own critical challenges with confidence.
atlanticcouncil.org
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://mishpacha.com/ukraine-the-new-israel/
Ukraine, the New Israel - Mishpacha Magazine
Ukraine is emerging as a new consensus that highlights the growing frailty of Israelβs own position
mishpacha.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://m.jpost.com/international/article-703061
Jews behind Russia-Ukraine war to form new Jewish state - Islamic scholar
According to MEMRI, Mraweh Nassar said that the West has forsaken the Jews because the Zionist project will fail in two years.
jpost.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/will-ukraine-become-americas-new-israel-206231
Will Ukraine Become Americaβs βNew Israelβ?
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters last year that he wanted his country to become a ββbig Israelβ with its own faceβ after the Russian invasion ends, stressing that security would likely be the main issue in Ukraine during the postwar period. Zelenskyy, who is Jewish, was drawing supposedly some parallels between the future of [β¦]
nationalinterest.org
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12399-024-01013-6
Post-War Ukraine: AΒ Kind of βBig Israelβ in Europe? - Zeitschrift fΓΌr AuΓen- und Sicherheitspolitik
In April 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy argued that post-war Ukraine could resemble a βbig Israelβ in Europe regarding
link.springer.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Chabadβs Heavenly Jerusalem Project Credit @hippyresident https://fitzinfo.net/forum/?amp
Forum, Fitzpatrick Informer
[forum].
fitzinfo.net
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
How nuclear-armed Ukraine could become βEuropeβs Israelβ | Ukraine: The Latest https://youtu.be/NtY4MpoOQ1s?si=xJ2XzDFcT-MczpOH
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://www.memri.org/tv/viacheslav-matuzov-russia-israel-ukraine-expansionist-enterprise-jews
Former Russian Diplomat Viacheslav Matuzov: Gaza And Lebanon Wars β Part Of Israel's Involvement In The Ukraine War; Millions Of European And American Jews Are Ready To Move To Ukraine To Build A 'Second Israel'; 80-100% Of Ukrainian MPs Have Israeli Passports
Former Russian diplomat Viacheslav Matuzov appeared on Mayadeen TV (Lebanon), where he claimed that Israel is heavily involved in the Ukrainian conflict. He alleged that 80% to 100% of Ukrainian parliament members hold Israeli passports and stated that millions of Jews from Europe and America are prepared to move to Ukraine to build a βsecond Israelβ there, citing the
memri.org
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://geopoliticalcompass.com/why-zelenskys-dream-of-ukraine-becoming-big-israel-makes-moscow-nervous/
Why Zelenskyβs Dream of Ukraine Becoming βBig Israelβ Makes Moscow Nervous |
geopoliticalcompass.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://kyivindependent.com/michael-brodsky-can-ukraine-become-a-big-israel/
Michael Brodsky: Can Ukraine become a 'big Israel'?
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has resulted in devastating damage to the countryβs physical, economic, and human infrastructure. Thousands of civilians have been killed. Millions of people have become refugees. A big part of the population is suffering from psychological trauma.
Although the outcome of the war is still
kyivindependent.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://thehill.com/hilltv/3262725-halper-zelensky-might-be-sending-a-signal-by-declaring-ukraine-to-be-the-next-israel/
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://gibraltar-messenger.net/ww3/ukraine-war-chabads-strategy-for-slavic-genocide/
Ukraine War: Chabadβs Strategy for Slavic Genocide
Wars Always Depopulate. Ukrainians think that they are fighting against Russia for independence, but their numbers are being reduced by design.
gibraltar-messenger.net
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://cepa.org/article/could-ukraine-copy-israels-military-tech-success/
Could Ukraine Copy Israelβs Military Tech Success?
Ukraineβs thriving tech sector is a key part of the nationβs defense against Russia. Some even look to Israelβs tech success as a model.
cepa.org
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://odessa-journal.com/israeli-investments-in-ukrainian-it-sector-going-to-increase-further-to-the-law-on-diia-city
Israeli investments in Ukrainian IT sector going to increase further to the law on DIIA City - Oj
Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine Michael Brodsky expects the growth of Israeli investments in the IT sector of Ukraine ...
odessa-journal.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
In 2022 Ukraine announced it will start issuing a CBDC which will be tied to their Digital Identity platform βDiia appβ. All part of the WEFβs Great Reset agenda. Alex Bornyakov, Digital Transformation Deputy Minister & head of Diia City Project.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We passed a law last summer that allows our national bank to start developing a CBDC. The law goes into effect this August, so our national bank is working with us on pilot projects in the meantime. We're considering different platforms and recently announced that one pilot will be on the Stellar blockchain. We're working with the Stellar Foundation and commercial banks in Ukraine to come up with a working concept. There are also pilots with Ethereum and the NEAR protocol underway. We should be announcing some results in a couple of months. Since the law goes into effect in August, we're trying to figure out the technical advantages and obstacles in order to potentially launch early next year or maybe even by the end of this year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister deputy minister, they would, a central bank digital currency be in the offering? You you have it it seems, it seems like you have everything in place to set it up, or at least some of the infrastructure with a digital passport. Do you think that that's something a a digital version, of the currency makes sense, to implement soon?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That's a great question, though. In last summer, I think in August, we passed their law that our national bank can actually start doing CBDC. And but but there's was there delayed the law was delayed in like, what's the word I'm looking for?
I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm trying to say that law passed, but there there was a provision that say that in a that it's gonna be in effect in a year. So this year, in August, it's gonna be, like, in effect. So in the meantime, our national bank, together with us, working on a pilot projects on CBDC. So we're considering different platforms. We recently announced that one of their pilots will be on the Stellar foundation on the Stellar blockchain.
So we work with the Stellar Foundation and commercial banks in Ukraine. They're trying to come up with their with their working concept. There's also, pilots with Ethereum, and and we're preparing a near with with a near protocol. So, I think in couple months from now, we'll announce some results on those pilots. And then we're trying to since, the law will be in effect in in August, so we're trying to do everything in that we it is possible to figure out what their their outcomes, what their technical advantages or or obstacles in order to launch it early next year or maybe in the end of this year.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
The Balfour declaration 2.0 was signed between the UK and Ukraine in January 2025, securing the land and minerals for the greater isreal project. Credit @corvus_usa
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Lord Jacob Rothschild admitted that his ancestors paved the way for The Creation of Israel forcing the British Government into signing the Balfour Declaration in 1917.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Balfour Declaration, a 67-word letter, shifted Middle Eastern history. Sent by Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, it voiced British support for a Jewish home in Palestine.
My great uncle Walter received the letter because Zionism was mainly an Eastern European movement lacking a clear leader in Britain. The Rothschild family was the obvious choice.
The declaration states the government favors establishing a Jewish national home in Palestine, ensuring no prejudice against existing non-Jewish communities or the rights of Jews elsewhere. It was a pivotal moment after 3,000 years.
The family played a key role in early Israeli communities. My cousin Dorothy, even as a teenager, connected Chaim Weizmann with the British establishment and taught him how to integrate into British society to promote Zionism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 67 words long. It's a hundred years old, and it changed the course of history for The Middle East and the Jewish people. The Balfour Declaration, the expression of the British government's support for a Jewish home in Palestine, was sent by British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to the second lord Rothschild. I'm here in Buckinghamshire at Waddeston Manor to speak with the fourth lord Rothschild about the Balfour Declaration, what it means for Britain, for the Jewish people, and the Rothschild family.
Speaker 1: The Foreign Office, November the second nineteen seventeen. Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you on behalf of his majesty's government the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to and approved by the cabinet.
Speaker 0: So it's possibly the most famous letter in modern Jewish history, and it begins with three words. Dear Lord Rothschild, why was it that this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to your great uncle Walter?
Speaker 2: It's an interesting question because he was ready in ornithology. Although he became interested in Zionism. I think the reason was this, that it was primarily a movement from Eastern Europe, but they didn't clarify who was in charge of that movement. And in addition, it was after all in Great Britain. So they felt that the Rothschild family should be the one to whom it was addressed.
Walter was Lord Rothschild and he was as honest, those really are the background reasons.
Speaker 0: So Walter received the Balfour Declaration and I have a copy here, and I wonder if I could possibly ask you to read it for us.
Speaker 2: Yes indeed. I'm going to put on my spectacles to make sure I read it accurately. His majesty's government deal with favor the establishment of Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people and reduce their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object. It being clearly understood that nothing should be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation, the Osarth of Balfour.
Speaker 0: And here it is, the Balfour Declaration. What do you feel when you when you see it here?
Speaker 2: I genuinely feel it's one of the most extraordinary moments in the history of the Jewish people. If you think it took three thousand years to get to this.
Speaker 0: And of course the Rothschild family then has now filled two roles because it wasn't just a leader of diaspora jury, it also played a very significant role in the early years of the establishment of the pioneer communities in Israel as well. I just want to revisit for a moment your cousin Dorothy, who you mentioned, who at an extraordinarily young age, still in her teens played such a critical role as a go between and a facilitator for Chaim Weitzman. Can you say a little bit about that?
Speaker 2: Well she married my cousin Jimmy when she was 17.
Speaker 0: So this is your cousin Dorothy Dolly?
Speaker 2: Yep, Mrs. Jones Ross Charles.
Speaker 0: And from her teenage years onwards she was a major supporter of Israel, wasn't she?
Speaker 2: Major supporter. I mean, she worships her husband who'd been deeply committed, son of baron admiral. It was due to him, I think, that she became interested. But once she became interested, interested, she became passionately interested. After his death, she became even more committed.
She just wanted to carry out his wishes and what he cared deeply about. And you can read letters from her to Weitzman and from Weitzman to her when she was only 17. And what she did, which is crucially important, was to connect up Weitzman with the British establishment.
Speaker 0: I think she also trained him in how to deal, she helped educate her how to And it's included
Speaker 2: at that age, but she did tell Weitzman how to kind of integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly.
Speaker 0: So I'm here in the Waddeston Manor archives where there is a treasure trove of remarkable documents from the time of the Balfour Declaration. We have the correspondence here between the teenage Dorothy and her husband James, and it's really a love story. Here we have detailed letters describing her dealings with Zionist leaders, her advice and her suggestions regarding the conferences of the Zionist movement. And here, we have a letter that the young Dorothy, still not 20, sent to Doctor. Chaim Weitzman, where she's talking about the meetings that she's arranged for him.
And as we've heard, she was helpful in training and preparing him to enter into the highest echelons of British society to advance the cause of the Zionist movement.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Benjamin H. Freedman The Balfour Declaration (I've included the link to the entire speech.) https://youtu.be/SqwFwl2lOeM?si=n3KetpNETes6jJpo
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Documents in relation to the Balfour Declaration.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20241003-jewish-pilgrims-journey-from-israel-to-ukraine-leaving-one-war-for-another-rosh-hashanah-new-year
Jewish pilgrims journey from Israel to Ukraine, leaving one war for another
More than 30,000 Orthodox Jewish pilgrims are thought to have congregated in the Ukrainian city of Uman for Rosh Hashanah, a key holiday in the Jewish calendar, some leaving war in the Middle East toβ¦
france24.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Interesting Documentary that is relevant to the thread. How Britain Started The Arab-Israeli Conflict Part 1 (https://youtu.be/ZXfuqUhzESg?si=xFc72cEOVs3pDZgQ)
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Arab-Jewish conflict's roots lie in British double-dealing during World War I. Britain, France, and Russia secretly planned to divide the Ottoman Empire, disregarding Arab and Turkish interests. The British promised Arabs independence and Jews a homeland, an irreconcilable contradiction born out of wartime exigency and imperial ambition.
Britain sought to secure the Suez Canal for access to India. They annexed Egypt and saw the Ottoman Empire, allied with Germany, as a threat. To undermine the Ottomans, Britain used bribery and subversion, exploiting Arab nationalism. They courted Sharif Hussein, offering support for Arab independence in exchange for revolt against the Ottomans, while simultaneously negotiating with France to carve up the Middle East via the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish emigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state of Israel. Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier in British double dealing during the First World War. This is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies, and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed, which has determined the fate of the Middle East.
Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, anyone else who got in the way.
Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand and Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one with the other.
Speaker 3: The British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use to them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine.
Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a postwar settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not. And the British saw the Middle East as the western flank for their power in India and their power in Asia in general.
Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of the twentieth century, King Edward the seventh ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part of the world.
Speaker 4: India became increasingly important because it was the second pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe, and the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way to do that. It's very important for the British geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure.
Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 1882. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed the fifth was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany.
Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the central powers. And pitted against them were the three allies, Britain, France, and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey, the sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been in almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914.
In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Eastern Front. In the East, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the Industrial Age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army.
Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. In that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 1914, when not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, they began to think about new ways of winning the war.
Speaker 0: Britain's Prime Minister Asquith felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with Foreign Secretary Lord Grey, Together with Foreign Secretary Lord Gray, Minister for War Lord Kitchener, and the first Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Central Powers. This was a global war,
Speaker 4: and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, the way of attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. And the
Speaker 0: soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, subversion, and double dealing. All these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire.
Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period bef up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do when the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up.
Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, it would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the Allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered what was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople.
Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete. This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable.
Speaker 0: Italy's King, Vittorio Emmanuel, was another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia.
Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement, which in normal circumstances would have been quite inconceivable.
Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire, nationalism.
Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent, That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of the nineteenth century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism.
Speaker 0: This came to a head when the young Turks took power in a coup in nineteen o eight, and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A thousand years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the East to the West, and their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa, and South Western Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased.
Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute, we're not part of this. So all of this literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism.
Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks. And they began thinking of having their own state.
Speaker 0: By the summer of nineteen fifteen, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally dispatched officers to sound out Arab leaders.
Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, you could say, seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not side with the Europeans against the Ottomans?
Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords and create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not from London, but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, Sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, impressed by Sheriff Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam.
Speaker 1: They called themselves Hashemites. They called the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashem, the sons of Hashem. So he was Sheriff Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina.
And although he had worked with the Ottomans before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance.
Speaker 0: A chance too for the British, who saw support for Sheriff Hussein as a way to threaten the Sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world.
Speaker 2: The British, because they were fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam, they wanted a counterforce, and the counterforce was represented by Sheriff Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sheriff Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians.
Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sheriff Hussein smuggled a message to the British High Commissioner in Cairo, Sir Henry McMahon, offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the two men, Sheriff Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. This letter of October 1915 outlined the main points of the arrangement.
Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Hussein is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create a modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic development, and that can only come from the outside world.
Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Faisal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of nineteen sixteen, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, Sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot.
Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war.
Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore French ambitions, and that the French were determined to have their historical peace of The Levant.
Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Picot personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue, which was to be directly controlled by France.
This included what was then known as Greater Syria, where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink, known as Iraq, with its strategic ports, railways, and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area colored yellow represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone, except for Haifa.
Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, and they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away bit from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq.
Speaker 7: The Sykes Picot agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to defend it. But it was drawn up by people who were sort of operating under the old kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial frame of mind.
Speaker 0: Unaware of these secret dealings behind their backs, Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence, and in June 1916, attacked the Turkish troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun, and the seaport at Jidder seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed north and engaged the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz Railway. The British saw the Arab revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the Central Powers.
In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the Southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the Southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, the Ottoman Empire.
Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They considered themselves to be fighting with the allies, but at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army, that they continued to act as an independent army called the Northern
Speaker 0: Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's General Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of nineteen seventeen, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines at the Somme had produced little territorial gain, and the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership.
The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in influence the American government.
Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that the American decision whether to join or not would depend critically on public opinion, and the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or the other.
Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British Foreign Office greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly the wealthy financial and commercial Jewish elites.
Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that here you have, particularly the British, seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, they start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important. And from the point of view of the allies, something else quite remarkable, this monolithic collective entity is pro German.
Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's Foreign Office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 1880s after Theodor Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia, who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish sentiments.
Speaker 3: The end of the nineteenth century saw the rise of antisemitism all over Europe, in Austria, in Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of, the lovers of Zion, societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, emigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, and the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be a minority.
Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in the first century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the promised land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late nineteenth century, the whole Jewish community by 1914 constituted barely 8% of the population.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
How Britain Started The Arab-Israeli Conflict Part 2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zionism gained appeal as it aligned with Jewish aspirations for a return to their promised land. Chaim Weitzman lobbied for Jewish emigration to Palestine, and Lloyd George saw Zionism as a nationalist movement to co-opt. The Balfour Declaration of November 1917, favored a Jewish national home in Palestine, but it was also designed to serve British interests during a deteriorating war.
The declaration stated that the rights of non-Jewish communities should not be prejudiced. However, it contradicted promises made to Arabs regarding independence. Britain's strategy, based on inaccurate intelligence, backfired when Bolsheviks revealed secret treaties. Despite Arab contributions to the Allied victory, the Sykes-Picot Agreement shaped the Middle East's new boundaries, undermining Arab unity and independence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Into the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe. And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be a minority.
Speaker 1: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in the first century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the promised land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late nineteenth century, the whole Jewish community by 1914 constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weitzman, had been lobbying the government for a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine.
By early nineteen seventeen, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weitzman.
Speaker 2: There is a bee in the bonnet of people like Mark Sykes that actually the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest, as they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine, they're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it.
Speaker 1: As negotiations with Weitzman continued over the following months, the war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted.
But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the East. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, the war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France became greatly alarmed.
Speaker 3: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, essentially, the Germans have won the First World War unless they bring the Americans in. There's no way that the British and the French on their own are ever going to defeat Germany.
Speaker 1: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik party, the new revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to commit sufficient forces, he knew it was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, to issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish people.
Speaker 4: His majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object.
Speaker 1: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 1717, just as British forces were occupying Palestine.
Speaker 0: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood not as an idealistic gesture, but it has to be understood within the framework of British imperial policy. And Lloyd George was the main instigator of that declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests.
Speaker 1: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet, Sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal for Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, the Balfour Declaration had also stated that
Speaker 4: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine.
Speaker 1: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish emigration.
Speaker 5: There were only a mere 80,000 out of some, like, 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews. The indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants. And that Palestine was being identified, even at that stage, as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish.
Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, a declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was a declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine.
Speaker 1: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, the secret Sykes Picot agreement. On November, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lloyd George hoped that it would have the desired effect of appeasing the Jews in the communist leadership.
Speaker 2: What is it that they supposedly so want as Jews? Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people, if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinoviev or Yaffe, some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian revolution, the the November revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists.
Speaker 0: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea.
Speaker 1: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, they opened up the archives of the czarist foreign office and published the secret treaties, the very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up the Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy.
Speaker 3: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which they have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, openly preaching that they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and of course also telling among others the Arabs that they are supporters of self determination for the people of the Ottoman Empire.
Speaker 6: Publication of secret treaties by the Bolsheviks certainly created enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the others said, wait a minute. What's going on? What a, why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into Zone A and Zone B? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only would the had the British got their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French.
Speaker 1: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, General Alamby entered Jerusalem on foot, together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them, reiterating British commitment to Arab independence.
Speaker 4: The Arab race shall be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world. This can only be achieved by the Arabs themselves uniting, and Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in view.
Speaker 1: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alamby's point of view, he continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, one party seized the initiative. In April 1918, Chaim Weitzman and the International Zionist Commission traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism.
Weitzman's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met General Allenby, it looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. Six months later, Alamby's forces entered Damascus. With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria.
Speaker 5: The Arab revolt did contribute to the victory of the Allies. First of all, it protected the British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the British could have never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force.
Speaker 1: On the October 3, the people of Damascus flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt and to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Alamby at the Victoria Hotel in Damascus. Alamby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited.
Speaker 5: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration.
Speaker 1: Undaunted by Alamby's warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sheriff Hussein, he set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. On the October 31, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11:00 on the 11/11/1918, the guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The peace conference at Versailles began in January 1919.
Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Clomonson, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized.
Speaker 7: They didn't even make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. And they also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world as an imperial world. Not only did they want to carve up the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial powers would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them.
Speaker 1: But Britain and her old ally France were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination.
Speaker 5: Once independence had seemed to be a possibility that this principle of self determination supported by the Americans was going to be offered to all those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state.
Speaker 1: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine in the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picocava. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine?
Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles Peace Talks with America, France, and Italy, wrote
Speaker 4: The four great powers are committed to Zionism, and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.
Speaker 1: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the postwar memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda.
Speaker 4: So far as Palestine is concerned, the powers have made no declaration of policy, which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate.
Speaker 1: The Versailles Peace Conference was concluded on June 1919, with the creation of the League of Nations, the first global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates, which meant, in effect, that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, and the French general Goureau arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and Lebanon. The British forces forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to the French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge.
Faisal, who had been the governor of Damascus now for sixteen months, had been consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by National Congress, the French were incensed, and General Gurro sent in his troops. By August 1920, Faisal had been deposed and had to flee to Palestine. The promises to Sharif Hussein and Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans.
Speaker 6: The whole issue of spheres influence meant that what appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being a French area and a British area meant that in effect this was the seed of partition. So you had both independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied.
Speaker 1: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable imprint of the Sykes Picot Agreement. The French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria
Speaker 0: became
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
How Britain Started The Arab-Israeli Conflict Part 3
Video Transcript AI Summary
After Faisal was deposed, the promise of a single Arab state was broken as the Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the Middle East. France gained mandates for Lebanon and Syria, while Britain controlled Transjordan, Palestine, and Iraq, including key oil fields. Although the Iraqi people initially rejected British rule, Faisal was installed as king.
Sheriff Hussein's dream of a Hashemite-ruled Arab kingdom was partially fulfilled with his son Abdullah becoming king of Transjordan; however, their rival, Ibn Saud, seized Hijaz. In Palestine, the Balfour Declaration, incorporated into the British mandate, promised a Jewish homeland, sparking Arab resentment and increased Jewish immigration, leading to conflict. The British policies sowed division, ultimately leading to the creation of Israel in 1948 and the displacement of Palestinian Arabs, leaving a legacy of betrayal and frustrated expectations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Faisal had been deposed and had to flee to Palestine. The promises to Sharif Hussein and Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans.
Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that what appeared, what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state, was in fact seriously diluted. Then on top of that, of course, the very fact of it being a French area and a British area meant that in effect this was the seed of partition. So you had both independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied.
Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable imprint of the Sykes Picot Agreement. The French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the East, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Massul, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq.
Speaker 2: So this was basically the importance of the Sykes Picot agreement, to divide what is called the Fertile Crescent between Iraq and Syria, and let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the future.
Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But Sheriff Hussein expected more from the British.
Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their promises.
Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussain's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became king of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hijaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, established by the British in the spring of nineteen twenty. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to three religions.
Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for hundreds of years. But the Balfour Declaration promising Jews a homeland in Palestine had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be open for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities, it seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence.
Speaker 3: The Arabs had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs, but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the twentieth century. And Chaim Weitzman exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and persuasion.
Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weitzman and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed.
Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the first place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. In
Speaker 0: 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine.
Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It committed Britain to support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and it did not produce any immediate benefits for Britain.
Speaker 4: Without the Balfour Declaration, there could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through in 1948 where you get the creation of a state of Israel simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily at the bottom line. The very fact that there are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way.
Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and '40s, the years of Nazi persecution and the Holocaust, Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs as an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate, and the State Of Israel was born in 1948.
When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War inadvertently left a deep divide between Arab and Jew.
Speaker 3: The most serious consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath of the first World War, Britain was left with this legacy of double dealing and of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time.
Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the state of Israel, and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else that happened in the first war is used as an excuse for the problems of the Middle East. Now I think that would be a mistake. But yes, the roots of what we see today certainly arose from the double dealing of the first world war and from the frustrated expectations of that time.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
George Soros set up his foundation in the Ukraine in 1990. Two years before the "independence" of Ukraine.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I established a foundation in Ukraine prior to its independence in 1990.
Figures like George Soros were unfortunately everywhere in these events. This team consisting of people like Newland, Soros, and Biden, acted in favor of Hillary Clinton's interests and tried to prevent Mr. Trump from being elected.
We can look at the Arab Spring in North African countries such as Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt, as well as the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, and the Orange Revolution in 2004. The Revolution of Dignity in 2013 and 2014, all of this is related to his activities. He continued his operations in 2015 and 2016.
Hunter Biden had deals in Ukraine, being on the board of directors of an oil and gas company in Ukraine. This explains the economic interests of the Biden family. Then there's the matter of supposed Russian election interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Set up the foundation in Ukraine in 1990, which is two years before the independence of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Where does George Soros figure in all this? Unfortunately, everywhere. This is a team of Democrats. Newland, Soros, Biden, in favor of the interests of Hillary Clinton did everything to prevent mister Trump from being elected in the February. We remember the countries in North Africa where the Arab Spring happened.
Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt. We remember the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan. We remember the rose revolution in Georgia. We remember the orange revolution in 02/2004. And finally, the consequences of not only the orange revolution, but also the revolution of dignity of two thousand thirteen and 02/2014.
This is also his activity. He did not stop. He continued to operate in 02/2015 and 02/2016. Hunter Biden has a deal in Ukraine. Explain that.
Yes. His son was and remains on the board of directors of one of the companies that is engaged in oil and gas production in Ukraine. So this also explains the economic interests of the Biden fan fighter. Not only the son, but probably his high ranking father as well. Russian.
Russian. Russia. Russian. Russian election interference. Russian witch hunt.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I funded dissident activities and civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland during the revolutions of 1989. Similarly, I established a foundation in Ukraine before its independence from Russia, and it has been active ever since, playing a significant role in current events. We've also engaged in discussions with Ukrainian leadership on revitalizing agriculture and enhancing energy efficiency through new company partnerships. George Soros was present, and we collaborated on these initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First on Ukraine. One of the things that many people recognize about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, The Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?
Speaker 1: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now.
Speaker 2: Ukraine. We also were able to have good discussions with the leadership there about how to restart agriculture and improve energy efficiency using this new model of partnering with companies. And we had George Soros was there too, so we engaged in some of the efforts
Speaker 0: with
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
The Soros Empire & Ukraine Connection
Video Transcript AI Summary
I visited a public health lab in Kyiv, Ukraine, with a new senator, and the lab director showed us vials of bacillus anthracis.
The strength of the Russian people inspires me, and I want to share the truth about the war in Ukraine. This isn't about denazification; Ukraine has a Jewish president whose family was murdered by Nazis. The Kremlin started this war. Also, we need to get vaccinated, wear masks, and practice social distancing to prevent viruses from spreading.
We're concerned Russian forces may seize biological research facilities in Ukraine. We're working with Ukrainians to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, an empire moved in, replacing it. I hope Putin will be taken out. He's a war criminal, like Hitler.
The FBI knew about Hunter Biden's laptop while Trump was being impeached. I established a foundation in Ukraine before its independence, which is still functioning. Biden's son made millions in Ukraine and there is massive corruption. When I was in the White House, we had peace through strength.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here I am in Kyiv, Ukraine with a brand new junior senator from Illinois. It's at a public health laboratory, and he looks concerned. And it's because from this kitchen like refrigerator behind me, the director of the health lab handed me this tray with vials of bacillus anthracis. That's the bacteria that causes anthrax. And we mapped many facilities like this throughout the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: The strength in the heart of the Russian people have always inspired me. That is why I hope that he will let me tell you the truth about the war in Ukraine and what is happening there. No one likes to hear something critical of the government. I understand that. But as a long time friend of the Russian people, I hope that you will hear what I have to say.
May I remind you that I speak with the same heartfelt concern as I spoke to the American people. Not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. You see, there are moments like this that are so wrong, and then we have to speak up.
And this is exactly the same with your government. I know that your government has told you that this is a war to denazify Ukraine. Denazify Ukraine? This is not true. Ukraine is a country with a Jewish president.
A Jewish president, I might add, whose father's three brothers were all murdered by the Nazis. You see, Ukraine did not start this war. Neither did nationalists or Nazis. Those power in the Kremlin started this war. But but I think people should know there is a virus here.
It kills people, and the only way we prevent it is is to get vaccinated, to wear masks, to do social distancing, washing your hands all the time, and not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. Because with freedom comes obligations and and responsibilities. We cannot just say, I have the right to do x, y, and z when you affect other people.
Speaker 2: Biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach.
Speaker 3: We all watched the television coverage of just yesterday. That's on top of everything else that we know and don't know yet based on what we've just been able to see. And because we've seen it or not doesn't mean it hasn't happened. But just limit it to what we have seen.
Speaker 4: When the Soviet Union, the Soviet Empire collapsed, and as the empire collapsed, moved in and picked up the pieces. First in Hungary in 1984, and then Poland in '4 in '87, China in '87 as well. And so this is how the this what I'm the Saurus Empire, replacing the Soviet empire.
Speaker 5: And how do you think you're doing in your imperial ambitions?
Speaker 6: Yeah. I I hope he'll be taken out one way or the other. I don't care how they take him out. I don't care if we send him to The Hague and, try him. I just want him to go.
Yes. I'm on record. Please understand senator Lindsey Graham, if John McCain were here, he'd be saying the same thing, I think. It's time for him to go. He's a war criminal.
I wish somebody had taken Hitler out in the so, yes, that Vladimir Putin is not a legitimate leader. He is a war criminal. He needs to needs to be dealt with.
Speaker 7: So we established a new civil rights a new civil rights cause of action for those whose intimate images were shared on the public screen. How many times have
Speaker 1: you heard?
Speaker 7: I bet everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line that in an intimate relationship, what happened was the guy takes a revealing picture of his naked friend or whatever in a compromising position. And then literally, in a sense, blackmails are are mortifies that person. Send it out. Put it online.
Speaker 8: Welcome back. We are back with Peter Schweitzer, the president of the Government Accountability Institute as we talk about all of the alleged money and deals that Hunter Biden did with officials across the world, particularly in China, Russia, and Ukraine. Peter was showing the business deals that includes a 3 and a half million dollar check from the, former, mayor of Moscow's Wife. Give us your take on the FBI and the Department of Justice's investigation right now into all of this. Is the FBI investigating Hunter Biden?
And could that happen while Joe Biden is president?
Speaker 9: Yeah. In fact, I think this New York Times piece, the fact that they got cooperation from team Biden and probably from the Hunter Biden legal team is an indication to me they are extremely concerned that he is going to be indicted. This grand jury's been meeting since 2018. They were suspended during COVID because of health care protocols. It's back up and running, and it's very clear that when it comes to the issues related to tax evasion and money laundering and the other issues wrapped up with it, they're extremely concerned that Hunter Biden's going to be indicted.
And I think this article is an effort to frame that conversation in a way that could be the most favorable to them.
Speaker 8: So in other words, while they were trying to impeach Donald Trump, the FBI knew all of this existed. They knew about the laptop, and they didn't say anything while Trump was accused of of of, doing, deals or or or having a bad phone call with the Ukraine President.
Speaker 9: Yes. That's exactly right, Maria. They knew it all the time, and that deserves investigation as well.
Speaker 4: I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of, Russia. And the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now.
Speaker 5: Because the corruption's massive. Now when Biden's son walks walks away with millions of dollars from Ukraine and he knows nothing When I was in the White House, we had peace through strength. They fucking around with us.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Forbidden Knowledge - History of the Khazar Empire Credit @RomanEmpire1993
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sixty-five years ago, I was born to fight the New World Order, which is cornering us like cattle. This fight began long ago with the Khazar warriors, who pretended to embrace Judaism, forming an inner circle dedicated to evil. These Khazars, not true Jews, aim to conquer and pillage, a philosophy that has persisted through history.
Meyer Amschel Bauer Berg, or Rothschild, initiated a financial enterprise with the intent of conquering everything through fractional reserve banking. They established banks in major locations worldwide. Adam Weishaupt, on behalf of Rothschild, created the Illuminati with a plan to abolish religion, property rights, inheritance, and the family. We must be brave and fight this tyranny by spreading awareness and safeguarding our Constitution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, without any further ado, I would like to introduce our first speaker tonight. He is also a radio show host and I'll let him give you the details on that. And so here you have it, mister Jack Otto.
Speaker 1: Thank you, friends. Sixty five years ago today, God Almighty put me on this Earth, and I believe it's to fight against this new world order. Thank you, and happy birthday. Happy birthday. Thank you.
We are being cornered like cattle into a pen, squeezed down. And we're never really going to be free people unless we're brave, because this was only the land of the free as long as it was the home of the brave and this started a long time ago with people that go back to the fourth century. Let me tell you about the flight of the Khazar warriors out of Northern Turkey in May. They were a despicable bunch. You could go to the king of the Khazars and rent an army from him, an army of 40 or 50,000 men, but it didn't matter what kind of a deal you struck with their monarch.
He wasn't called a king. He was called a shagan. Once the battle was done, they rape and pillage. Doesn't matter what kind of agreement you had with the king. That's the way it ended up.
And so as a consequence, people in the area garnered a great deal of animosity for these Khazar warriors. And in May, they were driven out, and as they came down south out of Turkey, some fled to the West into Romania and Hungary and became the Gypsies. The rest followed their monarch, the Chagan, up into the steppes of Russia and north of there to the Caucasus Mountains. And as they settled in there, they relatively well, they quite easily enslaved the relatively peaceful agrarian Slavic folks that were indigenous to the area. Then they came under pressure to take sides in a growing contention around them.
Coming down from the North was Eastern Orthodox Christianity and coming up from the South was Islam. And they knew that if they succumbed to pressure from either of those to join their organization and embrace their philosophy, it would surely offend the other. And so what they did was a politically expedient maneuver. He called in all the religious leaders of the area, and he got their input. And after the input, he announced for me and my people, we're talking about 20,000,000 people and about 4,000 nobility, for me and my people, we choose to become Jews.
Now this was not a heartfelt conversion. This was not something that was deep in their breasts that they felt they needed to make a conversion because they thought that was the proper way to serve the creator. This was something that was done as a political expediency. And in the course of studying about their new religion and you do have to study it even if you're only going to charade. It is absolutely necessary to study about it so that you can fake it.
And in the course of doing so, they came across a character with whom they could truly identify. It was Lucifer, the morning light that fell from grace and became Satan, the adversary. And they formed an inner circle within Judaism dedicated to the forces of evil. Let's define terms. What is a Jew?
If you look back in your Old Testament, your Bible, there was 12 Hebrew tribes. The 10 northern tribes are called the House of Israel. The two southern tribes were called Benjamin and Judah, more properly pronounced Judah, because we didn't get the harder sound to the J until about two hundred years ago. So this is what I would call real Jews, people from the tribe of Judah. And when we start talking about the New World Order, we are not talking about these people at all.
We're talking about these case are warriors that only pretended to embrace Judaism. And so today, we find that about 92% of the people who claim to be Jews really aren't. They don't have a drop of Semitic blood in their veins. They are Khazar warriors with a new bent on life and a goal to conquer, to rape, and to pillage. And that philosophy has come down over time, and we see how effectively they have implemented it throughout history.
Now, when they pretended to embrace Judaism, they drew upon the real Jews for some education, and they used the Hebrew alphabet as phonics to codify their Khazar language. And so now we look at that language called Yiddish or Ziddish and find that it is not Hebrew, it only appears to be. Now these people have run into some trouble over time. In September, they were overrun by the Varganians, which was Swedish ruled Slavic people. Varganian is the Russian word for Vikings.
And they were militarily defeated, which curbed their expansionist philosophy for some time. And then in November, they were literally overrun by the Mongols for Kublai Khan and Genghis Khan, and they were driven down into Eastern Europe. Their monarch, the king or Chagan as he was called fled to Spain and Portugal. Now, because these folks were darker skinned people with black hair and brown eyes, it was easier for them to fit in with the folks of Spain and Portugal and Italy and Sicily than they could other places where they stood out and looked markedly different. And they took a great deal of control, especially in Spain and Portugal, So much so that they were discovered in conspiracy because they worked together to get themselves, one of them, into a position of authority where that person can work in tandem with others to get more of their people in authority and positions of power and working it up to where they're running the show and milking everybody else.
After they fled down into Europe, there was one of them, a guy by the name of Meyer Amschel Bauer Berg, who decided to enter into clandestine world government. Meyer Amschel Bauer Berg used the symbol outside of his father's silversmith shop, a large red shield, as inspiration for an alias. And he went by the name of Rothschild, that's German language for red shield. Now Rothschild was born in 1743 and when he was in his late 20s he formulated a financial enterprise with 12 other entrepreneurs with the dedication, the interest and the intent of conquering everybody and everything. They were going to do it with fractional reserve banking, and that turned out to be a very successful tool.
We found out about fractional reserve banking at the Bank of Amsterdam in 1610 when, like all fiat money inflations, it came to a roaring bust. And they learned from that and wanted to implement it wherever they could so that they could be the ones that profited from, benefited from that enterprise. Now Meyer Amschel Bauer Berg had five sons, and he took these five sons and as they became of age, he sent them to foreign countries to operate not an independent banking system, but one in conjunction with the rest of their people, a system whereby Nathan, who went to London and soon proved himself to be shrewd. There was one named Coleman who passed himself off as Carl, and I think he went to Amsterdam. Jacob called himself James in Paris, and we find that throughout the world, in five big locations, they had banking institutions that had a very clever idea.
And if these people weren't so evil, it would have been easier to admire what they did. But they had a system whereby you could go to one of the banks in one country and deposit gold with them and get a receipt for it, and then go to the foreign country where they had another office, take that receipt, and get your gold, and you didn't run the risk of losing your gold on the high seas, either to wind or to pirates or anything else. So in a way, was kind of a clever scheme, however. These people were despicably evil, and their intent to make money was to not just put themselves for their head, but to hold others back. Meyer Amschel Bauer Berg lived to be well, he lived from 1743 to the year 1812, and that's why we got that 1812 overture, was to honor him.
His associates respected him and wanted to salute his passing. Meyer Amschel Bauerberg changed his name to Rothschild, and he also dropped the Bauer Berg suffix and called himself Bauer closer to home where he lived there at 148 Judenstrassen in Frankfurt, Germany. They later moved down to 148 Judenstrausen, and it was from there that he was able to do much of his chicanery. And he got in league with a guy, William IX of Hesse Castle. Now, if you remember about the Hessian warriors, the Hessian warriors were something they were warrior slaves that was purchased by the King of England from this land grave of Hesse Castle.
They were purchased for the price of $12,000 and much of that money was earned by just capturing these people through actual out and out brigand slavery and holding them until they could be sent to the king, in which they were told, don't ever let those colonists get a hold of you. They will skin you alive. Well, when the Hessian soldiers got captured by one of us, one of our forefathers, they started crying, Oh, please don't skin me. And they said, skin you? We're not going to do that.
Then they realized they'd been lied to. Many of them came over and joined the revolutionary forces of the Americans, and a lot of them escaped out to the West and melded in and became what we might call squatters out there in the wide open West like the rest of us did. Now, they did a pretty good job of interfacing with the Native Americans out there and were able to garner some respect for them. So it was among these same people that brought about so much of the war that we see in front of us throughout history. It was fomented primarily for profits and to scare us into believing that the only way that we could circumvent this war to get this behind us is if we were to form a league or united nations.
Now, the first attempt was when they had their man, Napoleon. Now, Napoleon was the emperor of France, but he came from Corsica, and it was shortly after Corsica was brought into the French Empire that he was given the nod to become the emperor and to engage his war. Now, this was shortly after that French Revolution. You know, I'm going to go back and take a step back and talk about that French Revolution for a moment. See, it was shortly after a man named Adam Weishaupt in May one of seventeen seventy '6 formulated an organization called the Illuminati.
This was done on behalf of Baron Rothschild, and it was for the express purpose of fomenting their plans and executing their goals for conquest. Now Adam Weishaupt encapsulated a game plan to bring about this world government. And in this game plan, he had it mentioned in there that they were to take France in the year 1789. Now these plans were formulated into writing and translated by one of the Ingolstadt University professors, one of Professor Weishaupt's cohorts, a guy by the name of Xavier von Joach. Now Joach translated these into French so that they could be taken to Paris and Silesia.
Now there was a courier, a guy by the name of Lanze, who had been an evangelist minister but quit God and decided to become an Illuminati agent and a courier. And he was taking these materials by horseback through Bavaria. In a place called Regensburg, he was struck by lightning, and it killed both him and his horse. And people found this man, this dead man and his horse with documents in the pouch, and these documents were passed up the chain of command to the elector of Bavaria who got to wondering, is there really a game plan out here to conquer the whole world? So we staged simultaneous raids on Rothschild's associates, primarily on Weisshopp's associates, and found a great deal of corroborating evidence enough to convince them that there truly was a game plan out there to take the whole world.
And there were six points to their game plan. They wanted the abolition of all religion, the abolition of property rights, of inheritance, and the worst one was down at the bottom of the list, the abrogation of the family. Now, we can see how that was implemented in Red China. Men went to one dormitory, women went to another dormitory, boys were here and girls were here, and the family was totally destroyed, and they used that to brainwash those people. When you got kids with no control over them except the one facilitator or his associates, The children are at their mercy.
And it's planned for here, for us, for our children, for our grandchildren, our great grandchildren. They intend to show no mercy. Now this formulation of the Illuminati led them down the road to this game plan wherein they are working diligently to take over the whole world. And in the course of doing so, when this courier was found, the elector of Bavaria, one Theodore von Dahlberg, decided after he staged those simultaneous raids that he was going to contact every head of church and state in all of Europe and gave them a translation of the documentation that was found in the pouches of that dead courier, that apostate minister named Lands. And so it was after the Napoleonic War when Napoleon ran into Lord Wellington at Waterloo and was stomped.
Now this would have been a big setback for Mr. Rothschild, but Mr. Rothschild had one of his associates following the war along. And this associate sent a message back to him by carrier pigeon. And the carrier pigeons let him know that Wellington had won.
So what he did was he was in Paris at the time, and he jumped in a boat, and he had some men taking through some terribly dangerous seas. Too bad he didn't get it right then and there, but nevertheless, he made it to the other shore to Great Britain, and he sold all of his British financial securities. And then he started acting all so scared and let the rumor out that Napoleon had won. Well, if Napoleon had won, everybody realized that their government was not going to be able to honor its financial obligations, and so they started selling theirs. And at the very depth of that despair, he quietly and surreptitiously had some of his friends start buying up those worthless securities.
And so almost overnight, he increased his wealth by 21 fold. Now, it was time to disappear for a little while. He wasn't really popular because he had put out a false rumor that Napoleon had won. And when people found out that Napoleon hadn't won and they'd sold their government securities based on the lie, they were a little bit disappointed. But Baron Rothschild was in a position now where he could force a reformation of the Bank of England and cause his people to be put in positions of power and authority.
And so as a consequence, it turned out well for him. It turned out way too well for him. So it was after this Napoleonic Wars that they had this big meeting in Vienna. Dignitaries assemble, others from around the world, and they said, it is the scourge of war that plagues us. And if we're ever to get rid of this scourge of war, we're going to have to have some kind of congress where nations can come together and we can live through this modern age.
One of the attendees was the czar of Russia, and he remembered the documentation that he had gotten from the elector of Bavaria, and he had studied it. And he knew about this program by the Illuminati to take over the whole world. And he got up in the middle of that meeting and he denounced the whole process. He pointed out that it was Wisehoff's plan to overthrow all governments and religion and take over the world in behalf of his organization, and he was the man personally who shot down the congress in Vienna. And Rothschild hated him for it.
And he swore that he who was heirs one day would destroy the entire Romanov family. And we saw that happen. Well, it was before our times we didn't personally get to see it happen, but we sure have a recording of it in our history books that in November eight of nineteen seventeen, I believe it was, that they went in and took over, killed the entire Romanov family, the czar and all his children. There's some speculation that one daughter, Anastasia, got away and another son is alleged to have gone off over to Poland and become a military officer under an assumed name. There's lots we don't know about what went on, lots we probably never will know about what went on, because everything has been based on deceit and lies, and we find ourselves boxed into corners based on these untruths.
So it was shortly afterwards that they had another man from their group, a guy by the name of Abraham Lincoln whose real name was Springsteen. And Abraham Lincoln Springsteen went about fomenting the civil war here. I'd like to call it the war of northern aggression because we've been lied to about that so much. We were told that was a a war over slavery, but it wasn't. It was a war over states' rights.
Two of the Southern states, Virginia and North Carolina, had long ago outlawed slavery. And yet, it was used to rally northern forces. That's the kind of thing I'd be willing to take part in. I would like to stop slavery wherever it could be found. And I'm sure it appealed to a lot of people to put an end to that despicable act of holding another human being like you would an animal and making them work for whatever you feel like giving them.
Now Abraham Lincoln had right in his cabinet a guy by the name of August Belmont. And August Belmont wasn't his real name. His real name was Schoenberg. He was a Rothschild agent. And down in the other camp, they had a Rothschild relative, a guy by the name of Judah Benjamin, who was the head of the secret police down there.
And after that, Abraham Lincoln resented his involvement with these people. And he made a speech in which he said, I feel at this time more fear for my nation than any other time, even during the war. An era of corporations has been enthroned and corruption will grow in high places. And we will end up with the wealth of many aggregated in the hands of the few. Now his resentment resulted in action, and he decided he was going to issue greenbacks.
He'd had enough of working with these people, and they would not put up with that. So they sent in one of their own, a guy by the name of John Wilkes Booth, a bad actor who dispatched Abraham Lincoln so that and it was done in conjunction with the Jesuits. See, there are so many of these Illuminati organizations out there. The one we just described by Adam Weishaupt was called the Bavarian Illuminati. There was another Illuminati called Avion over in, I believe, Great Britain.
There was one in Switzerland, and there was another one in France, the Grand Lodge Orient de la France. And there's a very important one called the Alumbrados that was formulated in Spain. Now, the Alumbrados is Spanish for enlightened ones, and the only existed for about twenty years before they changed their name. They changed their name to the Society of Jesus. They called themselves the Jesuits, and they pledged themselves as the protectorate of the pope.
And when you've got the Illuminati protecting you, it's the kiss of death. What we find about the time that this civil war was over, there was a guy who had been born in Boston, Massachusetts in 12/30/1809, a guy by the name of Albert Pike. He was an impressive intellect. He was a Harvard graduate back when it really meant something. He was the master of 16 languages, and he was a despicable son of a because he openly worshipped Satan.
He was part of an organization called the Palatalists. He was the one that converted this Knights of the Golden Dawn to the Ku Klux Klan. And he was the author of a book called Morals and Dogma. It is the most revered text among the Masons. And in this text on page three twenty one, Albert Pike said, It is Lucifer, the morning light, whose seething energies you must learn to control or implement.
So it was this Albert Pike, the same guy that wrote a letter to his superior in the Illuminati, a guy over in Europe by the name of Giuseppe Mazzini, who was the revolutionary leader. And Giuseppe Mazzini also happened to be the founder of the mafia. This letter that he wrote to Giuseppe Mazzini on August fifteen of eighteen seventy one outlined three world wars, And the first of those world wars was to be fomented between the differences between the German nationals and the Brits and end up with the downfall of czarist Russia and the rise of communism. Any of us who studied any history at all knows that's exactly how World War I took place. Then World War II was fomented between the Zionists, between the German nationalists again and the Brits to bring us in.
And in World War two, Israel was to be exactly as that letter said, and that letter used to hang right in the British Museum Library until 1977 when Baron Rothschild became a director. And as soon as he was on the board of directors, that letter disappeared from the library immediately. But since that letter so clearly delineated the first two world wars, I think we have to look at it seriously and take it to heart when it says in there so clearly that the third world war will be fomented between the Zionists and Islam. Does anybody see that materializing today? Every place we look, we can see it happening.
And we can see that the power they have here in this country to run things and to pull the nastiest little scams, and America believes it. Because they don't realize who it is that owns the newspapers. They don't realize who it is that owns the television, and sometimes they don't care. As long as there's going to be football on Monday night and I got beer at hand, that's all that counts. Well, at least for a lot of people, and I think once they find that they have let their children and their grandchildren slip into tyranny, they may regret it.
But regrets never come at the beginning, they always come at the end. We can see World War III shaping up just exactly like they planned for us, and not enough of us are doing what's necessary to stop it. Look at all the empty seats we have here. America should be flooded to this cause. They should be interested in what is transpiring.
They should be interested in who's doing what and to whom. It was right after World War I that JPMorgan was given the job of gaining control of the newspapers. They knew they must be able to control human thought with input. And if you can realize that the human mind is a whole lot like a computer, the old garbage in garbage out effect takes place. If you can control what people hear and see, then you can pretty much control what they think.
And they were able to utilize newspapers, and now radio and television, for just exactly that purpose. Now there were 78 newspapers, major ones, that they really needed to get control of, but JPMorgan thought if they got 25 of them, that would be enough to control things, but it wasn't. They realized soon afterwards that they had to get all of those newspapers under their control, And we got the likes of guys like David Rockefeller who announced that he wanted to thank the people of the Washington Post and the New York Times for respecting their pledges of discretion at the CFR and Bilderberger meetings. And he said if it wasn't for their discretion, it would not have been possible to prepare the world for a new world order. Oh, we heard George Bush say that a lot, didn't we?
George Bush senior. He was always talking about new world order. When he went into Iraq, he said, this is much more than about one small country. This is about a big idea, about a new world order. There's a lot of people don't even know that on the back of their dollar bill where they see that all seeing eye of the pyramid what that means.
They don't realize that's occult symbolism that was put in by these Satanists during the Roosevelt administration by his vice president, a guy by the name of Wallace. They don't speak Latin, so they don't realize that Inuit coepitas up at the top says announcing our enterprise. They don't realize down at the bottom of the pyramid where it says Novus Ordo Seclorum. What they're talking about is Novus is new. Ordo is order.
Seclorum is world, the entire world minus God. So we're talking about a new world order without God. We have little time left. So much of what they've done has been implemented, and we can see that they were able to do a lot of this through fractional reserve banking. That was accomplished several times.
We had central banks here in America, even when they weren't supposed to be, when the people were against them. Oh, and they never dared to call it a central bank, but essentially that's what it was. The War of eighteen twelve was fought just because people weren't going to have a central bank, but by 1816, the Treaty of Ghent, we had another central bank here in America. Through this fractional reserves, they are able to change prosperity and poverty. It's all done through the discount.
If you lower the price that you lend to the member banks, they can in turn lower the price that they lend to their banks, who in turn can lower the price that they lend to people. And if it's low enough, people are going to go out there and borrow money and use it and get themselves trapped, not realizing how badly they are pinned in. Because all it takes is a little change on that lever, and they start taking money out of the system. And when they take the money out of the system, it becomes sluggish. Just like you, if somebody took onethree of the blood out of your body, it would affect you.
Well, that's what happened here. They told us that the Great Depression was brought on by people who were investing in the stock market on a shoestring. And because they had only 10% down, they had great marginal swings caused by the leverage of that debt. But the real truth of the matter is the thing that really brought it down was they removed one third of the money from circulation. So with that lever, they can move things up and down, up and down, and this goes up, people run out, oh, prosperity is here.
Let me jump in on the bandwagon and get my fair share. And about the time they do, about the time they think they're leveraged up and ready to roll so they're going to make some money with their new business, all they got to do is lever it back down. And then they go in and collect through forfeiture. Do you know how many homes are being scooped up by the banks right now? I think it's so close to the end policy, the end time game here that some of these smaller bankers are going to find out that they're getting pinched in this thing too.
See, it's only the fattest of the fat cats that they really intend to have survive and prosper. They're trying to wipe out the whole middle class. I don't feel like I'm middle class anymore. I feel like I have been reduced to the impoverished. Life is not the same as it used to be.
We just do not have the same kind of prosperity that we once had. And if they can have their way, and I see no reason why people in authority with as much power and leverage as they've got, it's going to be difficult to stop them from having their way. We're all going to be reduced to abject penury. Life where you won't have two nickels to rub together. You may have a whole pocket full of million dollar bills to rub together, but they won't buy anything.
Now, after World War I, they had this big conference in which they brought together all the people involved in the war to have a settlement and a signing of the armistice with Germany. On one side of the table was Paul Warburg. On the other side of the table was his brother, Max Warburg. In total, there were a 17 of these false Jews, as I prefer to call them. And we would not know about this except one of the guys there, a guy by the name of Benjamin Friedman, who was the bagman for Henry Morgenthal Sr.
He became a Christian, and he decided he could not live with the secrets that he held, and he started talking about what had transpired, what the real game plan was, who was involved in it, and what their plans were for our future, an unseemly plan for our future. Much of that was done with these what you call false flag operations. A false flag operation is where you go in and pretend to be somebody else, do something wrong so that the people that you attack thinks, hey, it was those people that did it to me when it really wasn't those people that did it to you. We find that a whole lot of that is done by these false Jews. For example, the Lusitania was sunk to start World War I.
Now Germany had taken out advertisements in the New York newspapers and said very specifically that they were carrying munitions aboard that Lusitania. Don't ride. Don't go on it. Well, while they were doing that, they ended up sending off some of that ships with 128 American passengers aboard it. And it wasn't Germany.
It was Great Britain that sunk that ship to suck us into that war. They were having trouble. See, Germany was already winning, and they didn't like the idea at all. And so these characters went over to the King of England and said to the King of England, now you don't have to surrender to Germany. If we can bring America in on your side, if we can cause America to start fighting your battles for you, would you support a homeland in Palestine for us?
And the king of England was, what do I do? Do I surrender or do I agree to let somebody else's have that home? Oh, yeah, yeah, we'll support that. So in November of nineteen seventeen, the King of England sent a letter called the Balfour Declaration to Lord Rothschild, whom he called the most eminent Jew. I think he should have called him the most eminent false Jew because the real Jewish people have absolutely nothing to do with this new world order, this aggrandizement of power and the passion to dominate others.
This is all among these Khazar warriors that only pretended to embrace Judaism in July. We find that as time went on that we run across some of these things that these characters have done. And it was in May of nineteen nineteen at Dusseldorf Germ Germany that the Allied forces obtained a copy of the communist rules of revolution. Now you've got to remember that communism was their front too. When we find out the names of some of these characters, you realize, yes, this web is more intertangled than what you might realize.
And we find that some of the characters like Karl Marx his real name was Kissel Moses Mordecai Levy. Karl Marx was just an assumed name. And he worked with people over there like Lenin, whose real name was Ulanov, and the Commissar of the Red Army and Navy called Leon Trotsky. His real name was Lev Dovadovich Bronstein. And when you find out how all these people have been pulling together to foment so many of these things going on here, you should be forewarned because this is not just accidental history.
This is conspiracy, people working together to do wrong. And by definition, a conspiracy is just two or more people planning in secret to do something wrong. And by that definition, there must be thousands, millions, maybe even billions of conspiracies going on all the time. But you mentioned something about what's going on. Oh, that's one of them conspiracy nuts.
We've all been vilified by that label. Conspiracy nut is kind of like antisemite. It's just a buzzword to say, they're onto us. They know who we are. They know what we're up to.
Let's jump on them and vilify them, and that's the way they operate, through vilification. And if vilifying isn't enough, they'll trump up some charges. And if that's not enough, they send in the wet agents to spill some of your blood. Well, in Dusseldorf, Germany, the communist rules of revolution came to light. And in 1946, a US Attorney General obtained a copy of the same rules from a known member of the Communist Party.
And today, these same rules are in effect, and I want you to compare these concepts with modern occurrences. There's three of them, ABC. A, corrupt the young, get them away from a religion, get them interested in sex, make them superficial, and destroy their ruggedness. We sure have a lot of whips today. Some lot of these young kids coming up just don't seem to have what it takes anymore, but they've been through the public fool system.
They've been nurtured by their television, and it's hard to think anymore. It used to be when you went to school, they taught you how to think. Now you go to school, they teach you what to think. B, get control of all means of publicity thereby and there are seven parts to that get people's minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletic, sexy books, plays, and other trivialities. And boy, have we become trivial.
Two, divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. Number three, destroy the people's faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule, and disgrace. Four, always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. Number five, by encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent. That one has really been implemented with vigor.
We're playing welfare Santa Claus to the whole world. Now take a look at Israel alone. We send $15,500 for every man, woman, and child. That's a lot of money. Sometimes I think some of us wish, gee, I wish my government would give me that much each year.
Now that's only the above board welfare. There is a subrosive welfare. For example, that's our only friend in The Middle East. Therefore, we gotta have a base over there to protect them. Do they give us a base, or do they rent it to us at a high price?
Well, since we never find out exactly how much it's going to be, they can rent it at a high price, and nobody counts it as part of the great welfare. Number six, incite unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorder, and foster a soft and lenient attitude on the part of government to such disorder. Number seven, by specious argument, call the breakdown of the old moral values, honesty, sobriety, self restraint, faith in the pledged word, and ruggedness. So those are the seven reasons they wanted to get a hold of means of publicity so they could implement that. And number C of the communist rules of revolution caused the registration of all firearms on some pretext with a view to confiscating them and leaving the populace helpless.
So many of these false flag operations have gotten us into big trouble. We know now that that ship, I think it was the mainer that was sunk down there in Cuba. We were told it's because the Spanish had mined the harbor, but we now know that the explosion took place inside the ship. It was all the excuse they needed to go attack and wage war against Spain. We see so many of those false flag operations.
World War two, it was Pearl Harbor. It wasn't a false flag operations, but it was sure close to it. It was pretending like we're just innocent people standing here when six months before Pearl Harbor, our government froze all Japanese money in banks. Any way you look at it, that's theft. Three weeks before Pearl Harbor, our government gave him a 100% oil embargo.
Do you remember back in the seventies when we got a 10% oil embargo from the Arabs and the lines at the gas pumps were long and we suffered under that? That was a 10% oil embargo. And our government tried to run a % oil embargo upon those people who just weren't gonna put up with it. Now I think admiral Yamamoto was right that when they came over and stung us, they were only waking a sleeping lion. But there was nothing else they could do.
It's either knuckle under or fight. And that's where it is to us. It's getting down to the point where we either knuckle under or do something to fight about this. Right now, it's a fight of words because, quite frankly, we're in a very awkward position here. It's too late to work within the system and probably too early to start shooting.
And I think there's a whole lot of us here in America that really and truly are gutless. And it's only gonna be the land of the free as long as it's the home of the brave. Well, we can see that after World War II, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose real name was Rosenfeld, hooked up with his good buddy over in the Soviet Union, a guy by the name of Josef Stalin. His real name was Josef Vizarinovich Jugashvili. Gashvili means son of.
And he let his good buddy Joseph Stalin oversee the elections in much of Europe. And ironically, all those people decided to become pawns in the communist superstate. It was Joseph Stalin that said so clearly, and we better pay attention to what he has to say, Those who cast their votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything. And we saw that happen here not too long ago in America because George Bush got elected, and it was his brother down there in Florida that sure did a lot to swing the votes.
Remember all those hanging and pregnant chads and all the excuses they had to not count a lot of votes and to count other ones that they shouldn't have. And it reared its ugly head here again in 02/2004 because down in Ohio, the people who were in charge of the election commission said to the people who were bringing in the voting machines, all right, open up your voting machines before the polls start here because I want to see ahead of time that all the registries are set to zero, that there are no names inside. And they said, oh, no. You can't look inside these machines. It's for security.
It's for the sanctity of the vote. We must not let anybody look in the machines. And they said, we're the ones in charge of seeing whether or not the sanctity of the vote is taken care of. You're going to open up those machines right now. And there was a lot of protesting, a lot of weeping, and a lot of wailing, but they did end up opening up those machines.
Every machine had 300 to 400 votes for Bush on it already. It was a big deal done in Ohio. It was on television. It was in the newspapers, but it just didn't make its way around the rest of America. Why?
Who owns the newspapers? Who owns the television? Who owns the radio? The same people that own the voting machines. There's only four companies here in America that own voting machines, and every one of them are mafia affiliates.
Now these television stations, ABC, NBC, CBS, all the rest of them that have any influence and any power whatsoever, got together and formed a new corporation. It's called News Election Services. And they're the ones that feed information into the News Election Services about what's transpiring in the election and getting information back out of it. And so they have control. And it matters not who we vote for.
What really counts is who does the television and the newspaper announce to be the victor. It's important because at stake is not only our freedom. But if we don't have freedom, we don't pass it on to our children. And if they don't have it, they don't pass it on to our grandchildren. And it's important to me for subsequent generations to enjoy the treasures, the pearls, the gems of liberty.
Liberty is that notion where you've got a right to make a choice. You decide what's good for your life. But somehow we've got to the point where you have to get a license for everything. But as long as the people don't speak up, as long as we don't do what's necessary to inform the others around us, As long as we act lethargically rather than robust and animated champions of liberty, it'll slip right through our fingers. I have to ask you, are you willing to crank it up?
Are you willing to pass out more DVDs? Are you willing to talk to more people? Are you willing to do what's necessary to safeguard our Constitution? For it was I think it was Daniel Webster that said, safeguard your Constitution, for miracles do not cluster. What has happened once in six thousand years may never happen again.
And if the American constitution goes down, there will be anarchy in the world. Let's safeguard it like it's precious. Thank you.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
American Journalist Gonzalo Lira, who was killed by Zelensky, exposed Bursima connections to the Bidens & Israeli billionaire Igor Kolomoyski. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ihor_Kolomoyskyi
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Zelensky, and my political career was manufactured by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski. He owns OnePlusOne Media, which financed the TV show *Servant of the People*, where I played the president. The show was popular and Kolomoyski then created a political party with the same name, and I became their candidate, despite having no political experience.
Kolomoyski's financial support has made me a billionaire. He also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to sit on the board of Burisma, which Kolomoyski controls.
Ukraine has been used as a piggy bank by unsavory people in the Washington establishment, leading to corruption and exploitation that have made it one of the poorest countries in Europe. The West is terrified the truth about Ukraine will come out, exposing their secrets and corrupt dealings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is
Speaker 1: a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelensky, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show.
It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly, Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest.
Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch.
And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes. In 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, excuse me, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma?
Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as president of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine.
But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who is President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine.
And this is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe: because of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? Fifty thousand dollars a month. And you say to yourself, well, 50,000 isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States.
In Ukraine, a much poorer country, dollars 50,000 a year would easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year, and Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh, yeah. Look it up.
You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden.
God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.
Ihor kolomoyskyi - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Fake Breakup Of The Soviet Union Exposed! Leninist Strategy Anatoliy Golitsyn New Lies For Old Part 1 Credit @RomanEmpire1993
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Bill McElhaney, welcome to the McElhaney Report. We have Christopher Story, editor of Soviet Analyst, to discuss Anatoly Galitsyn, a KGB defector who revealed a long-range Soviet deception strategy. Galitsyn exposed that the Soviets never abandoned their Leninist goal of world control, instead, they shifted to infiltration and deception.
The appearance of splits within the communist bloc, like the Russia-China divide, was a deliberate tactic to lull the West. Similarly, staged liberalization movements were designed to identify and eliminate genuine opposition. Gorbachev's "perestroika" was not reform, but a restructuring of the Western mind for control. Galitsyn's predictions, including the fall of the Berlin Wall, have proven remarkably accurate, showing the continued deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the McElhaney Report. I'm Bill McElhaney. Each show, we cover a crucial issue of the day, but always from a viewpoint or perspective rarely if ever aired by the mass media. We hope you'll find it interesting. This is perhaps the most important interview we've ever conducted.
Since 1989, we've been told constantly by the mass media and the government about the so called death of communism and the collapse of the Soviet Union and its Eastern European satellite nations. We are told that the new Russian rulers are democratic and opening up to political and economic freedom. The Bush and Clinton administrations have proposed even greater aid from US taxpayers to the rulers of what is called the new Russia and the new Eastern European states. They tell us that we must aid and be partners with these rulers and join with them in a new world order. Our guest today can refute this conventional wisdom.
He is one of two outstanding experts in the free world on this subject. The other expert, Anatoly Galitsyn, the source of this information, has been living in The United States in hiding under an assumed identity since 1960 to protect himself from murder by the Soviet KGB. Our guest today is editor of the London based periodical Soviet analyst and editor of Galitsyn's second book just published in the spring of nineteen ninety five, the Perestroika deception. I want to welcome Christopher Story to the McElhaney Report.
Speaker 1: Delighted to be here.
Speaker 0: Very happy to have you, sir. For our listeners who are unfamiliar with this subject, we must start at the beginning. Anatoly Gleeson, this is one of maybe one or two existing photographs of him, probably taken thirty years ago. Who is Anatoly Galitsyn, and what did he reveal when he defected from the Soviet KGB in 1960?
Speaker 1: Galitsyn is the most important defector ever to have reached the West. He came out actually in 1961. He fled to Finland in 1961 with his family, and he revealed the existence of a long range strategy deception based on Leninist principles. And his importance is that all defectors who've come since him appear to have been engaged in an attempt to refute what he says. So we looked to Galitsyn as the source of proper insights into what the communists are really up to.
Speaker 0: And he predicted, did he not, that the KGB would send false defectors deliberately to discredit him.
Speaker 1: That's correct. And this happened almost immediately afterwards within six months. Several defectors Now both from the KGB and from the military intelligence
Speaker 0: In addition to identifying to identifying Soviet moles in European and in the European intelligence system, British intelligence system, French, he provided this whole new understanding of Soviet disinformation strategy. There was one man in the CIA who listened to him seriously. That was James Angleton. Tell us about Angleton.
Speaker 1: James Jesus Angleton was a very remarkable counterintelligence expert, and he debriefed Galitsyn, and he became absolutely convinced that Galitsyn was telling the truth. This is clear from internal evidence, but Angleton became aware through Galitsyn of the significance of what the Soviets were really up to.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Basically, what Galitsyn taught and revealed was that these all Soviet governments are Leninist governments. They're driven by the deception strategy perfected by Lenin, which is aimed at achieving strategy, namely control of the whole world.
Speaker 0: And part of this strategy as really put into a a codified plan by 1959 dealt with creating the impression that liberalization or destabilization, decentralization was occurring in the communist states as a way of lulling the West into putting down its defenses.
Speaker 1: Yeah. What happened was that according to Galitsyn, is that after the death of Stalin, the communist realized in general that the method of control that they'd been adopting, namely brutal repression, was an inefficient method of achieving control over populations, and that it was more efficient to seek to achieve control through infiltration and deception and through the control of the minds of the target. Mhmm. And so the party instructed Alexander Shelipin, who was the head of the KGB in 1958, to develop a plan for the use of the total resources of the revolution. And the KGB and the GRU, military intelligence, were instructed to become the instruments of the mobilization of the resources of the revolution.
So between 1959 and 1961, Chelypin developed, perfected, and agreed with the party the full outline of this deception plan. Mhmm. And the deception plan is basically a means of projecting communism into the whole of the rest of the world. And they do it through deception, and we can examine how this is done as we go on.
Speaker 0: Well, one of the features of the plan, obviously, was to give the impression that the international communist movement was breaking up, there were splits, divisions, dissent, that there were there was a rift between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. There was a rift between Red China and the Soviet Union. All of these things were examples of this dissent disinformation strategy. And one of the the principal goals of it would be that the West would would would feel would feel more secure and let and put down its guard.
Speaker 1: Yes. Lenin Lenin's methodology involves the use of the dialectic. Now the western mind, which is a civilized developed mind, does not understand dialectical deception, which is basically a Mongol concept. And the the China the the fake Russia China split is a good example by creating the false impression that there was a split, which incidentally, they've continued ever since because now we have communist China and supposedly non communist Russia, so the illusion of the split continues. The West was lulled into believing that if it supported China, it would be taking precautionary action against Russia.
Yes. In fact, what's happening and is continuing, they are both working together. Yes. And their intentions ultimately are hostile. They're in that they are aggressively oriented towards the West.
Speaker 0: Yes. And another another consequence of staging deliberately staging a phony encouragement of or or setting up let's say, up phony the KGB setting up phony dissident movements within communist countries and supposedly or in a theatrical way presenting what appears to be liberalization or some lessening of tight control, that also has the effect of lulling the underground the genuine underground opposition to communism in these countries out in the open, giving them the false hope that they can speak out, and then further identifying them and destroying them.
Speaker 1: Well, this goes back actually to czarist days. Mhmm. In fact, the czarist secret police were adept at this. Mhmm. But Stalin's henchmen, the the founder of the Chekhov, Dzerzhinsky, was particularly skilled at using what we call false opposition.
And in fact, this was was the main thrust of Lenin's strategy in the in the nineteen twenties. When Lenin launched into the West what is known as the trust, he exported. He allowed the emigration of a large number of emigres. And in their number were many controlled communist
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Members of the Cheka. And he introduced this false controlled opposition to Western intelligence. And West and as a result, Western in the the perception of western by western intelligence of what was really happening Mhmm. Was distorted. Now this principle has been applied since 1961, and it came to its fruition under Gorbachev.
Gorbachev's perestroika, which means restructuring, is in fact the restructuring not of Soviet society, although that was done for there was a certain amount of reform and restructuring to give it credibility. Superficial. Right? Superficial. It is essentially the restructuring of the western mind Mhmm.
The control of the western mind. That is what it means. Stalin used the word perestroika, and it meant in Stalin's vocabulary, it meant the reshoing of a horse. So per the West misunderstood perestroika, the meaning of perestroika, thinking that it meant reform of the communist movement. And this is because It's a deception.
Speaker 0: Yes. And this is because everything that we've witnessed since 1989 has been part of this grand dis disinformation strategy, which Galitsyn revealed in his 1984 book, New Lives for Old, had been prepared by 1959.
Speaker 1: Yes. The long range strategy is what it says. It it's a long range strategy. It took years to come to fruition. There are a number of reasons for this.
They had to allow, for example, those with memories of the Stalin repressions to die off. Mhmm. They had to ensure that the true opposition no longer existed, and they have liquidated all true opposition in all All countries. All countries.
Speaker 0: That Which means
Speaker 1: With a few exceptions.
Speaker 0: Which means, as Galitsyn has pointed out, then that we and those deceptions are subject to quest those exceptions are subject to
Speaker 1: quest Even those deceptions.
Speaker 0: But when we see a supposed dissident movement within a communist or so called former communist state, having access to the media, operating openly Sure. Having resources, and being able to express itself and be heard around the world, it would immediately be suspect of being a KGB front operation, at least in terms of its leadership.
Speaker 1: Absolutely correct. And as a result of the ex what Gorbache Gorbachev, first of all, launches Perestroika internally. And when the softening up process has been completed, I e, the West is attuned to the fact that there's been this apparent reform Mhmm. And that it's all falling apart. Mhmm.
They then export Perestroika to the whole world. Right. So that in fact what has happened is that you have instead of having walk ins, you know, defectors arriving and knocking on the West door. You've got a mass walk in. Mhmm.
So that no one knows who's genuine and who isn't. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: To go back just a bit regarding Golitsyn defecting to the American CIA in the early nineteen sixties, he had an advocate in James Angleton. Yeah. Advocate in James Angleton. Yeah. The influence of what Galitsyn revealed was felt through Angleton's policies.
Yes. But that came to an end in 1974 when Angleton was fired by CIA director William Colby Mhmm. After Gallitson had warned that there were Soviet moles, Soviet agents within the CIA at high levels. To what extent was Galitsyn vindicated by the Aldrich Ames exposure?
Speaker 1: Totally. I mean, Galitsyn has been telling everybody Mhmm. Since he finished the first book, New Lies for World, which actually he finished in 1980 Yeah. Although it was only published in 1984, that the CIOs penetrated. Mhmm.
This was obvious from internal evidence. Now, of course, with the the Ames case, that is proved. I mean, everybody knows that there are many more moles inside Western Intelligence than just AIMS. But AIMS is a is a symptom of the penetration of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Speaker 0: In the book, as you said, written in 1980, published in 1984, Galitsyn's New Lies for Old, he revealed not only this massive disinformation strategy, which goes back to 1959 and and the ramifications of it, the applications of it during the nineteen sixties, '19 seventies, but he made a series. The book was published in '84. He made a series of incredible predictions regarding what was going to come as a result of this strategy, and the predictions are just amazing to read. Can we go would you go over some of them?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, he had there are three or four pages which are just chockablock full of predictions. He he talks about the removal of the Berlin Wall, Liberalization starting in East Germany and spreading to the rest of Eastern Europe. He he says, for example, that Dubcek will be restored in Czechoslovakia, which duly happened for a brief period. Mhmm. And general and he talks about a reconciliation with the West and the reunification of Germany and so on and so forth.
And in a recent book published by Mark written by Mark Reebling called Wedge, The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA, published in 1994, Reebling carries out a method a careful analysis of Galitsyn's predictions in New Lives for Old. And he established that out of a 48 falsifiable predictions, 139 had been verified by 1993. Now that and he gave him an accuracy rating of over 94%. Mhmm. That is without parallel in the West.
Mhmm. I mean, this puts Gillitz in in a in a separate category from everybody.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Now, I think
Speaker 0: In other words, if Gleeson is not telling if Gleeson is not telling the truth about have
Speaker 1: Everybody has to explain why these predictions were correct.
Speaker 0: If he's not telling the truth about the fact that all that we have witnessed since 1989 was planned as Soviet disinformation strategy going back this far, then he has to be a prophet. He just has to he has to be a clairvoyant.
Speaker 1: Either he has to be he has to have supernatural powers. He has
Speaker 0: to have supernatural powers.
Speaker 1: Or he has to understand Soviet strategy. That's right. And of course, the answer is the latter. Yes. He understands Soviet strategy because he knows that it's based on the thinking of Lenin.
He studied Lenin. Now, one of the things that I've done in the last few years is go back to Lenin and try to read and understand this what this evil man is saying. Mhmm. He's actually preaching hatred. He's preaching how to deceive, and he's teaching us how to deceive.
And Lenin's disciples remain in control of the world communist movement. Mhmm. All they've done is relabeled themselves
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: In order to appear acceptable to the West. There's a passage in Lenin where he says that there's a that there may come a time in the revolution when true revolutionaries must put on the appearance and the clothing and the manner and the language of the enemy. Mhmm. And this is what they've done. So that and and it's very easy to see that this is the case once one understands that this is what's going on.
If you take someone like Andrei Khosyrev, the Russian foreign minister, you can see Mhmm. That everything he says is a deception. He he he is an absolute he's the most brilliant representative of the Leninist case currently operating. He's a son incidentally of one of the Soviet diplomats who were kicked out of London by by the Douglas Hume government in 1972.
Speaker 0: There is a description in New Lies for Old of a new liberal or more democratic figure who would emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union Sure. That is a mirror image of Mikhail Gorbachev.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Now tell us about Mikhail Gorbachev and perhaps he is apparently more credible, at least in the eyes of the world and the media, successor Boris Yeltsin. Did they ever show any trace of interest in democratic reform?
Speaker 1: Well, what they did show an interest in was in the continuation of their Leninist strategy.
Speaker 0: I mean,
Speaker 1: the the important point about Gorbachev is it as in the case of Hitler and Mein Kampf, he clearly and repeatedly laid down in black and white in speeches and in his book, Perestroika, what he was doing. He made it quite clear what he was doing. In Perestroika, he said, we went back to Lenin. We reviewed Lenin. We took inspiration from Lenin, and we based our strategy on Lenin.
So when I was asked by missus Thatcher, as she then was, to see her in the House of Commons in July 1991 to explain these matters to her. I was completely flabbergasted when she said to me, I don't think Gorbachev is a Leninist anymore. And then she also said, I don't think we've been deceived. At least, I hope we haven't.
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: So I've I was in fact, that was the real turning point in my the later part of my life. That was when I realized I should spend basically most of my time trying to explain how how she was conned Mhmm. And how wrong she was. Of course, it's very simple to do. You can show from Gorbachev's speeches, from his writings, that in fact, was constantly quoting Lenin.
He he is and was a key advocate of the Leninist world revolution. And, of course, he remains so to this day. Mhmm. Gorbachev, as you probably know, is in charge of the so called Gorbachev Foundation, which various experts led by Hans Graf Hoon, a well known German expert, has has have identified as, in fact, the International Department of the CPSU, and it's based here in San Francisco.
Speaker 0: Communist Party, Soviet Union. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: The International Department of the CPSU was in fact the Comintern. Mhmm. So the Gorbachev Foundation based in the Presidio in San Francisco is in fact the Comintern. Mhmm. And the what Gorbachev is in charge of is influencing the western elite.
And in fact, the the key elite, of course, is based here. This is the elite that he has to influence Mhmm. Which is what he's been doing ever since he arrived with a large delegation in Washington in 1987.
Speaker 0: That's right. And his opponent or his political rival or his the opposition, the quote unquote opposition he faced, Boris Yeltsin, comes from the same Leninist
Speaker 1: background? Oh, no question. I mean, Boris Yeltsin is the was awarded the the order of Lenin. He is a Communist Party chief. He's he could not possibly have risen Mhmm.
To the level he did in in the structures without being approved at the highest level. I mean, no one can can move without approval.
Speaker 0: Well, now looking at the reality of what exists today in light of the predictions Gleeson made in New Lies for Old, we see that as he predicted, the Soviet Union and its power and control over its republics, separate republics, and satellite nations still continues through the same KGB and leaden bureaucracies that have simply been given new names.
Speaker 1: Well
Speaker 0: The but that are still in place. Yes. Fully in place.
Speaker 1: The so called independence of the Soviet Republics is false and provisional. It's based on Lenin's fake Far Eastern Republic, which he set up in the late nineteen twenties. And the purpose the existence of these republics has been brought about for a number of strategic reasons. I mean, at a fairly low level, one of the most important reasons is that the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and all the international institutions have been penetrated by all these countries. So instead of just having The USSR and Ukraine and below Russia as it up to '27 1990, we now have, you know, 16 of these republics.
So that this that suddenly, we've got 16 KGBs Mhmm. And we've got 16 delegations in the World Bank and the IMF. So that these institutions have now become have metamorphosed into instruments of the revolution more clearly than was the case before. That is one reason why they are provisioning in you know, they they were given this curious independence. But another very important reason is that with the apparent independence of these countries, they opened up scope for independent military action so that the repression which sudden subsequently took place in Georgia, Tajikistan, Moldova, and in Abkhazia could take place.
The minorities could be suppressed, and Russia could be whiter than white. Mhmm. Do you see what I mean? Yes. In other words, the communist the the the repression was carried out by apparent non communist.
Speaker 0: Was delegated delegated. Right.
Speaker 1: And it was actually in the case of Georgia where the most severe repression has been taking place, supervised by Shiva Nazi Mhmm. Who the West thought was the
Speaker 0: Was a Christian.
Speaker 1: Was not only a Christian, but, you know, baptized a Christian, but the the the architect of the end of the Cold War. Yeah. He's known as Stalin too in Georgia.
Speaker 0: Yes. Alright. In the early nineteen eighties, Ebrahim Shifrin of Israel, an expert on Soviet concentration camps, published a guidebook to these camps listing over 1,700 concentration camp sites in The Soviet Union with millions of prisoners. Are we to believe that all of these suddenly vanished in about 1989?
Speaker 1: Are we to believe that these people suddenly, all of a sudden, set aside their ideology and suddenly started talking normally?
Speaker 0: Or the some 60,000,000 members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, did they all stop being members of it instantly at the same time?
Speaker 1: Galitsyn makes it quite clear in his new book, The Peristroika Deception, that the the power structures depend on the continued adherence to revolutionary objectives of the Komsomol. Mhmm. There are 50 over 50,000,000 members of Komsomol. They work closely with the structures. And so he says somewhere in the book, he says, scratch any of these so called sudden instant Democrats.
Mhmm. You will find underneath them a Komsomol or a secret party member. So with all these people you see on the television screen in Moscow, they are all, without exception, secret party or consignor members.
Speaker 0: We're going to have to do a second show on the content of Parastroika Deception because it covers the period of 1989 through 1993 Mhmm. And written by Galitsyn and actually derived from memorandum he memorandum memorandum he prepared for the CIA, which they, of course, ignored. But we hear about free enterprise, a burgeoning of free enterprise in in The Soviet Union and in the Eastern European countries, what is the reality of this? I mean, isn't it isn't it overwhelmingly controlled and limited in a way that that makes a mockery of the term free enterprise?
Speaker 1: They themselves call it state controlled capitalism, which is, of course, a contradiction in What has happened is that Lenin's original state was a criminal state. The Chekhar, the Soviet intelligence, controlled the mafia, invented the mafia, became the mafia. Mhmm. So that what this apparent outbreak of free enterprise we see is in fact controlled by the KGB. And this outbreak of Soviet criminality is controlled.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: And it's being exported on a global scale. Right. Why is it being exported? In order to it's one of the themes that they are developing to create problems which need global solutions so that there's a world criminal crime epidemic, terrorist epidemic. We've got to have global structures in order to contain this epidemic which they themselves have created.
Speaker 0: Also, the KGB generated criminal activity provides an excuse for ever tighter control over whatever window dressing business or free enterprise or business or entrepreneurial activity may exist over there.
Speaker 1: Sure. And not only that, but of course, you've got the drug element as well. It since the nineteen fifties, Soviet military intelligence, GRU, has been in control of drug networks all over the world. Mhmm. And the reason
Speaker 2: the GRU controls is involved in this is because it's sabotage. You know, the the the narcotics operation is sabotage. Other elements are controlled by the KGB. Christopher, we're going continue in our second part of this interview. Want to thank you for being with us today.
If you found any of this information as you should interesting and disturbing please contact us at the address or phone number given at the end of the program. We will be happy to send you full documentation on any subject that we discussed that may interest you. This is Bill McElhaney for the McElhaney report. Thank you so much for
Speaker 0: joining us.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
@RomanEmpire1993 Fake Breakup Of The Soviet Union Exposed! Leninist Strategy Anatoliy Golitsyn New Lies For Old Part 2 Credit @RomanEmpire1993
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since 1989, the perception that the Soviet Union collapsed and communism is dead is a deception. It's a multi-decade KGB strategy to achieve a totalitarian world government. Anatoly Golitsyn, a KGB defector, predicted this in his book, "New Lies for Old," with over 94% accuracy.
The KGB remains intact, divided into several parts under different names, but it is fundamentally the same. The Soviet concentration camps still exist, despite media silence. The Soviets relaunched a long-range strategy in 1961 with the goal to deceive the West. This included a global drug offensive, international terrorism, criminalism, and cultural subversion through the "Gramsci dimension." The so-called Russian mafia is actually a KGB operation controlling business activity. The European Union is the "new European Soviet," a political collective destroying national sovereignty. The communists always win no matter who is elected due to deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the McIlhaney report. I'm Bill McIlhaney. On this show, we cover current issues of the day, but always from a viewpoint or perspective rarely aired by the mass media. We hope you'll find it interesting. Since 1989, the world has been told that the Soviet Union collapsed and that except for several countries, communism is dead and The US won the Cold War.
The truth, the reality is quite the reverse. Everything we have witnessed since 1989 has been a massive and successful multi decade long deception strategy on the part of the KGB, the Soviet secret police. The goal, to deceive the West and achieve the goal of Leninist strategy, a totalitarian world government or international police state. We know this from the evidence provided by Anatoly Golitsyn, the most important defector from the KGB who came to America America in 1961. In 1980, he wrote a book, New Lies for Old, that was published in 1984, which described the disinformation strategy and made specific predictions as to what the KGB KGB would do in subsequent years, such as removing the Berlin Wall, changing the name of the KGB itself and other structures in the Soviet hierarchy, and also the role to be played by Mikhail Gorbachev.
An independent analysis of these predictions years later showed that over 94% of them came true by 1991 and since then. That's how we know Galitsyn was telling the truth and quite correct. Our guest today, who first appeared on this show in 1995, is uniquely qualified to expose this conspiratorial strategy. Based in London, he publishes 10 newsletters and reviews on economic, financial, and political intelligence, including Soviet analyst. These invaluable periodicals incorporate the understanding of post 1989 events provided by Anatoly Galitsyn.
He's published Galitsyn's second book, Perestroika Deception. He's also published Joseph Douglas's Red Cocaine on the Soviet Strategy of Using Drugs to Sabotage the West. And he's published a very important book, the European Union Collective on the regional world government now in place over both Europe and Britain. I am so happy to welcome back to the McElhaney report my valuable friend and colleague, Christopher Story. So glad to have you here.
Speaker 1: Delighted to be here.
Speaker 0: Now for those people who are just learning about Anatoli Galitsyn, we need to emphasize that the understanding he provided about the strategy of which he was a part in the early nineteen fifty nine to sixty one period in forming this strategy in the KGB hierarchy. This multi decade strategy means that nothing really has changed in the Soviet Union and the other satellite East East block communist states that call themselves democratic republics today. Nothing has changed except deception, appearance, and propaganda. And let's go over some examples of that. Don't don't we have the same KGB led in bureaucracy with different names on the doors?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. The KGB remains the same. It's divided itself into several parts, but this is by no means the first time this has happened. It's happened about five or six times in since 1917. But Galitsyn's great achievement was to make Lenin understandable because, actually, all that Galitsyn did in his two books, New Life for Old and the Peristroika Deception, is is to explain Lenin's mind.
And these people actually are are in Lenin's mind. They're out of their own minds, and they're in Lenin's mind
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Which is not a very nice place to be. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Also, the system of some 1,700 concentration camps that comprise the Soviet gulag prison house of of of territory with millions and millions of political prisoners. All of those concentration camps are still there, but never discussed by the media, which since 1989 has told us that communism's gone out of business.
Speaker 1: In a few years ago, I was privileged to receive a list of these concentration camps from a very reliable source. And this list contained the actual street addresses, I mean, so to speak, of and the locations of of these concentration camps. And these included a number of new camps which have been set up under the so called, you know, quote, unquote, non communist government of Boris Yeltsin, which in fact was a continuation by other means, which we'll come to. Now I published this. When I published this in Soviet analyst, I thought this has got to be, you know, a really a really interesting story.
I sent it to the whole of the the western media that I could think of the the English speaking world. Not a not a trace. No no response at all. However, there have been a number of open references to this, which have appeared almost as if by accident in articles in the Guardian and elsewhere, which, of course, I and others collect. And when you put these things together, you get actually a very interesting picture.
There's been no change at all.
Speaker 0: Okay. Not only has there been no change in the Soviet concentration camp system, but in their massive military buildup, their worldwide espionage activities within Western nations, the subversion and sabotage they wage, particularly the area of sabotage called drug trafficking.
Speaker 1: Basically, in 1961, the Soviets relaunched or launched a long range strategy, which is what Gilitsyn talks about in his two books. I should say perhaps that the the communist party of the Soviet Union has had four programs since it started, only four party programs. The first was nineteen o three. The second was after the revolution nineteen seventeen. The third party program is that which Galitzen speaks about and writes about in his two books, the third party program.
Speaker 0: Which would be from 1961 onward.
Speaker 1: From 1961 to 1986 when Gorbachev Gorbachev is is sorry. 85. Mhmm. Gorbachev arrives as general secretary in '85. And at the twenty seventh party congress in 1986, he launches the fourth party program.
We'll come to that in a minute. So the and the the purpose of the long range strategy, was which was actually announced by the head of the KGB in 1959, they prepared this strategy. And then when they had worked out how they were going to deceive the West in what has turned out to be the biggest deception operation in the history of mankind, to be honest, when they worked this out, they convened a conference called the eighty one party con congress, which took place on one day on the 12/06/1961. And these the consisting of 81 part parties from all over the world, communist parties, and the long range strategy was rubber stamped, and that was it. And from 1961 to the arrival of Gorbachev was a period when they were preparing for the implementation of what Gorbachev subsequently introduced.
Now I'd last like just like to stay to say here something very important, which is that sometimes people say, why has why was there such a long period from the introduction of the third party program to the introduction of the fourth party program? And the answer to that is extremely interesting. It is that in 1949 or 1948, the Western allies agreed with the Soviet Union, I. With Stalin, that that Germany was to be occupied for a period of forty years. Eighty forty nine to eighty nine takes you to the pulling down of the Berlin Wall.
And on queue, quick as a flash, they start pulling down the wall at the end of the forty year period. So what do they do during this this extended period? Now we, by the way, we don't really know why that forty year period was agreed, but it seems to have been an agreement, almost a secret a secret agreement. By the way, secretary of state Burns, b y r n e s, was responsible for agreeing. That that was his last that was his most important contribution, as a matter of fact.
Mhmm. That's his main legacy. And we don't really know why it was it was agreed that the the Germany should be occupied for forty years. I don't I personally do not know that that question.
Speaker 0: Third party program from '61 onward consisted of this scheme to promote disinformation about the alleged crumbling of monolithic worldwide communist superstructure, alleged rifts and splits between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union and Red China, and give the West the impression that communism was fragmented and becoming decentralized. At the same time, they were waging the they were creating and waging an international terrorism campaign by creating an international terror network, which we'll we'll get back to. And they were using drugs and drug trafficking internationally as they gain and gained total control over international drug trafficking as a weapon of sabotage against the West. Yes. So these are all strategies along with military buildup and espionage.
Speaker 1: These are all sub strategies, but they're very important planks. I mean, basically, there are four main sub strategies within the long range strategy apart from the the weak look, which you've already described. The weak look being, you know, appear weak, which is based on the ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu, which Sun Tzu's famous book, The Art of War, is was required reading and still is in the Soviet military and in the East German. We happen to know that it was required reading in the East German military because we've got a copy of the East German translation of something too, which appeared in 1956, which is highly significant. So the sub strategies are the global drug offensive, the international terrorism offensive, the what I call international criminalism, which is the exploitation of organized criminal operations in the interest of strategy.
Right. And now this is extremely important. We're gonna come I'm sure we're gonna have a chance to talk about that more because, basically, that is almost completely controlling what's happening today. Mhmm. And then finally, we have well, of these four, we have the what I call the Gramsci dimension.
Now the Gramsci dimension, I
Speaker 0: Named after the Italian communist, Antonio Gramsci.
Speaker 1: Antonio Gramsci, g r a m s c I. He was the founder of the Italian Communist Party and was imprisoned by Mussolini and wrote a a book on basically, toilet paper while he was imprisoned called The Prison Notebooks. And his thesis was that you you have to change the the cultural base Mhmm. In order to achieve the revolution. So once you've got everybody with garbage ideas in their heads and you've destroyed art, you've replaced music with hideous noise Mhmm.
You've satanized music, if you like, and you've caused all the things you you all the you've attacked and undermined all the institutions. And traditional values. You've the traditional values have destroyed you you've eliminated religious teaching and all that. That is what I call the Gramsci dimension. That's you which is commonly known as the culture wars.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: This is a strategy of the Leninist Soviet revolution.
Speaker 0: Right. And the criminalism consisted of creating what is now today called the Russian mafia, both within the Soviet Union and internationally so that any business activity that continued during this period of alleged, democratism or alleged, reform in the Soviet Union, any business activity conducted there could be controlled by KGB agents who appropriately enough since they've always been criminal a criminal enterprise now call themselves the Russian mafia
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And penetrated all of these business organizations and made sure that they were able to control any active comp commercial activity, any type of commercial activity, whether coming from foreign capital or within Russia so that the KGB would maintain even tighter control.
Speaker 1: That's absolutely true. And and in fact, I understand it. I don't know his name or I can't recall his name, but the head of the Russian mafia, m a f I y a, to distinguish it from the the Chicago type mafia, is a resident in New York City.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Because that's where the action is. That's right. But the the the importance of criminalism cannot be underestimated because what has happened is that the k is that the KGB being a criminal enterprise by by definition was always very close to the huge underground economy which existed under overt communism. By the way, I used the phrase overt communism.
Speaker 0: Pre 1989.
Speaker 1: Pre 1989 and covert communism to describe the present situation. Right. Which is I think a useful short form way of doing it. Yes. So that under the KGB, there was an organization called the economic department Mhmm.
Which appeared to be dealing with economic issues, but actually was concerned with controlling the with controlling and developing the criminal underground.
Speaker 0: Underground.
Speaker 1: And then in parallel with this, because on the principle of Leninist duplication, Lenin duplicated every aspect of government and activity Mhmm. Party activity, state and party activity. The Ministry of the Interior, the MVD, had its own criminal control organization called which go going by the letters OBKH. Mhmm. So you have these two sources of of background expertise and knowledge of how to control criminal operations.
Speaker 0: Which is today the so called Russian mafia actually Yes. Just another branch operation of the KGB.
Speaker 1: And the after the so called fake collapse I mean, after the fake collapse of communism or during this period, the Soviets, in fact, exported large numbers of KGB officers who'd been retrained as criminal controllers. Mhmm. I call them criminalists Mhmm. Operators of criminalism. Mhmm.
And they have joined up with the underworld, the huge underworld in the West Mhmm. Here as well. Now the drug dimension of the world revolution, which they largely control, but not entirely, but they largely control it, is, of course, operates in parallel with and is is part of this criminalist operation. Mhmm. And this the and, basically, the drug the drug international drug trafficking elements that they control must finance the world revolution.
But it has another very important point rationale, which is that because the proceeds of drug operations have to be banked, they have their own bankers. Now we know from Joe Douglas' book, which I was privileged to edit and publish, Red Cocaine, that which is based on the debriefing of a a very senior Czech defector called Jan general Jan Schaena. We know that Schaena was actually the highest official in the Czech Communist Party. He was he was the this this the secretary overseeing everything. And he was responsible for making the administrative arrangements for delegations of bankers who were coming to Czechoslovakia in the late the second part of the sixties to be selected by the Czechs who were acting as cutouts for the Soviets.
Although there were Soviet senior Soviet officials present at these selection meetings, they actually chose the bankers who were going to launder the proceeds of their drug operations because they knew that these would become so massive. Mhmm. Now I'm not saying that the Soviets are totally in control, but the extent of their operations is huge. And in the Western Hemisphere, by the way, it's controlled by the the the America's Department of the Cuban Communist Party.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. So this but and and internationally, this was a combination of Soviet military intelligence, the GRU, because it is sabotage against the West. And also, through the Soviet Union's control of the red Chinese dictatorship because red China has been a principal grower of heroin and supplier of heroin worldwide too. So they have two bases of operations.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, they have they're more because there are others as well. But, basically, what happened was that after 1949, the Soviets watched the Chinese because Mao Tse Tung used drugs against his own people. Mhmm. And then after the revolution, the Chinese communists exported their their their drug trafficking as an element of their own operations.
Mhmm. The Soviets watched this, and then they set up their own separate international drug, know, offensive. Mhmm. And in the course of doing this, they they tried to penetrate those those rings, those groups of drug operators that they could. And where they couldn't succeed, the to actually break in, they formed their own and and replaced them, basically.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And in Colombia, of course, through the the America's Department of the Cuban Communist Party, they control what's going on in Colombia. Mhmm. No question.
Speaker 0: So this organized criminalism as an activity on the part of the KGB since 1961 is the Russian mafia and controls any business activity that we hear about as examples of alleged free enterprise breaking out in the new so called new Russia and the satellite nations.
Speaker 1: That's that's almost entirely true. I mean, what we have in these these countries is what I what Lenin called state capitalism, which I now have renamed state controlled capitalism, which means that it appears to the West as though these enterprises are entirely freestanding. And they've got shareholders and they have managing directors and they've got they've even got in Moscow large office blocks like Gazprom. Mhmm. But they are in fact entirely controlled by the the state
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: With the the revolution, but through the the the intelligence services.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's a deception and a performance very similar to the performance of political democratism where we see alleged rival parties and rival candidates taking part in elections in the so called new Russia and the new satellite nations when actually all of these parties are controlled by KGB personnel, and it is a performance for the American public to watch on CNN and through other parts of the media. A major part of this strategy since 1961 has consisted of building slowly and installing a very dictatorial regional world government over all of Europe on top of the existing socialist bureaucracies that that are in the governments of each of these countries over all of Europe and now sadly also Britain in the form of the European Union. And this constitutes an accomplishment of Leninist strategy as predicted by Galitsyn. And, of course, while the KGB had infiltrated all the European governments and the British government as they had infiltrated the American CIA and and other parts of the United States government, in addition to that, the current treaty arrangements between the European Union based in Brussels and this and the new Russia mean that there's even further tighter Soviet and KGB control over the foreign policy of this new globalist regional government that controls Russia, that controls Europe, and controls Britain.
Speaker 1: I don't disagree with any of that. One of the important things that Galitsyn teaches us in the is that it doesn't matter who wins an election. The communists always win. Mhmm. Now the reason for that is that every single political activist you see on the Moscow stage, if you can be bothered to see what's going on.
Because, by the way, the TV cameras are only focused on Moscow. That's right. You never see what's going on in Leningrad or in Tbilisi or in Alma Ata or anywhere else. Only Moscow. That's where the controls take place.
Because all the other so called, you know, free republics now, they're not they're controlled, of course. These republics, you know, they're still Stalinist states. Right. Almost entirely. There's hardly any I don't think there are any exceptions to that.
But this business of controlling all the political parties and giving them allowing them to adopt different names, you know, that this was a conscious policy Mhmm. Which was laid down by Gorbachev and Yeltsin Mhmm. At the twenty eighth party congress in July 1990.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Both Gorbachev and Yeltsin made speeches in which they said to the comrades, now is the time to follow whatever path you feel would be most appropriate. In a nutshell, that's what they said. We have the two quotes in my book, the the European Union Collective. So that's what I call democratism, which is the creation and maintenance of the illusion of democracy.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Now that pattern is being implemented in the European Union. Mhmm. Because by various means, almost all the participants, at national level in the political process, are selected for the job or are, you know, appointed or are, you know, chosen. Now it's it's quite difficult to explain this, but in Britain, there's an extremely lethal piece of legislation which requires all political parties to register at a central registration point. And the it it it basically dictates what the political parties can and cannot do.
But in the European on at the European level, no political party can participate in the European Parliament if it's not 100% signed up to the idea of the European project.
Speaker 0: And submission to the authority of this regional world government based in Brussels, which is now imposing dictatorial controls on a daily basis down to the most minute level of business and human activity on all residents of Europe and increasingly in Britain. And if you read the Financial Times newspaper, you see examples daily and in the Wall Street Journal of how the European Union is trying to tell people and businesses in The United States what they will do.
Speaker 1: That's quite true. When go Gorbachev visited London briefly for a day on the 03/23/2000, and during that visit, he made a statement, which I repeated at every opportunity. He he acknowledged and stated that the European Union is the new European Soviet, and I quote. That's what it is. Yes.
Now let me describe the European Union, what it really is. It is a political collective. So all these British politicians who constantly talk about the need to be in the center of Europe and the need to influence, you know, for Britain's great experience to be used for the benefit of of the Europeans so that they you know, so that we can influence what they do are completely wasting Yes. Their breath. They are insulting our intelligence.
This is a political collective. Mhmm. In a in a political collective, decisions are taken collectively. Right. No individual nation can take any decisions.
Now we So
Speaker 0: it destroys the sovereignty completely of all the individual
Speaker 1: nations. No sovereignty. Right. We have no interests, and we have politicians in Westminster who talk about British interests. Mhmm.
We have delegated and collectivized those interests. Now there are a few residual peculiar exceptions. For example, there's a thing called the common foreign and security policy, which is part of the Europe of the collectivization process. Well, Brit Britain flouted that policy by joining The United States respect of this Iraqi operation. Right.
But we shouldn't have done that. The the the Europeans didn't know what to do and threw up their hands in horror. Yes. But this will probably be the last time chance we'll have Mhmm. If we don't get out of it.
Speaker 0: Oh, so Gorbachev's purpose and it's so interesting that Gleeson describes Gorbachev in the book he wrote in 1980 before anyone had heard of him, describes his role, describes the character that he would play on the stage of this deception, describes him. And his purpose, obviously, was to go from the third party program of 1961 to about 1985. And in 1985, start the idea that the Stalinist model was over with Yeah. And that there was going to be this new reform system. Yeah.
Christopher, I knew we could just barely get into the subject matter thus far, but we're gonna do another show on related topics, recent topics. I want to thank you so much for being with me today. And if you're interested in learning more about what we've what we've discussed and being able to examine the background information so you can learn about this massive and successful Soviet disinformation strategy, please contact us at the phone number or address given at the end of the program, and we'll get you that information. This is Bill McElhaney for the McElhaney Thank you for being with us today. Welcome to the McIlhaney report.
I'm Bill McIlhaney. On this show, we cover current topics of the day, but always from a perspective or viewpoint rarely aired by the mass media. We hope you find it interesting. Since 1989, the world has been told that the Soviet Union collapsed and that except for a few countries, communism is dead and The US won the Cold War. The truth, the reality is quite the reverse.
Everything we have seen since 1989 has been a massive and successful multi decade long deception strategy on the part of the KGB, the Soviet secret police. The goal, to deceive the West and achieve the goal of Leninist strategy, a totalitarian world government or international police state. We know this from the evidence provided by Anatoly Galitsyn, the most important defector from the KGB who came to America in 1961. In 1980, he wrote a book, New Lies for Old, which was published in 1984. This described the disinformation strategy and made specific predictions as to what the KGB would be doing in subsequent years, such as removing the Berlin Wall, changing the name of the KGB and other state structures, and the role to be played by Mikhail Gorbachev.
An independent analysis showed that 94% of the predictions made in that book in 1980 came true by 1991 and since that time. And that's how we know Galitsyn was telling the truth and quite correct. And understanding Galitsyn is absolutely indispensable to an understanding of international terrorism today, what happened on September 11, and the war recently fought in Iraq. Our guest today, who first appeared on this show in 1995, is uniquely qualified to expose this conspiratorial strategy. Based in London, he publishes 10 newsletters and reviews on economic, financial, and political intelligence, including Soviet analysts.
These invaluable periodicals incorporate the understanding of post 1989 events provided by Gleeson. He has published Gleeson's second book, Perestroika Deception. He's also published Joseph Douglas's Red Cocaine on the Soviet Strategy of Using Drug Trafficking as a Means of Sabotaging the West, and a very important book, the European Union Collective on the regional world government now in place over both Europe and Britain. I am so happy to welcome back to the MacLennan report my good friend and colleague Christopher Story.
Speaker 1: Delighted to be here.
Speaker 0: In the introduction, I tried to summarize briefly what we've covered in prior shows. And what I wanna concentrate on today is another major example of Soviet strategy since 1961 or what was called the third party program Mhmm. From 1961 onward. And the fact that this strategy has continued unbroken since 1989 is just another example of the continuity of KGB control in The Soviet Union and the other communist countries despite the pretense and deception about reform and democratism and changes that allegedly were made. And that, of course, is the international terror network.
Now we had the benefit of knowing, going back to the early nineteen eighties from works like Claire Sterling's very important study, the terror network. We had the ability of knowing that by the early nineteen sixties, the Soviet KGB literally created an international terror network worldwide in scope with training centers around the world in Soviet satellite nations and headed by two principal directorates. The one directorate of this being the Palestine Liberation Organization, TLO Leadership Directorate comprised of several parts and headed by Moscow trained Yasser Arafat. And also the Cuban based the the KGB in Cuba is the DRG. The Cuban based Tri Continental apparatus.
And these were the two directorates running this terror network created by the Soviets in the mid Yeah. Sixties. So let's talk about that terror network because it still exists today, and we're told communism has collapsed and yet their terror network is functioning more actively with the same KGB control today.
Speaker 1: Yes. In I think it was January 1966, the Soviets summoned a special conference in Cuba called the Tricontinental Conference. And far as as far as I recall, 538 delegations from communist structures around the world arrived at this conference. And this conference decided and agreed in in accordance with a with a a Soviet plan to establish a network of terror training camps, and they started doing this in Cuba. And by October 1966, a whole series of terrorism training camps had sprung up on the outskirts the outskirts of Havana.
And these terror training camps and operations were controlled by a KGB colonel called colonel Vadim Kochegin. And by the end of the first year of operations, 1967, they were turning out 1,500 trained terrorists for application for operations all over the world in their own countries and elsewhere. Now in not very long afterwards, these Cuban trained terrorists who included Arabs and Palestinians were setting up what I call the second generation of terror training operations in various parts of the Middle East, Lebanon being the most important. Now the Iranians are very important in this. The Iranians control Hezbollah, as you know, which is an absolutely deadly terrorism operation network.
Speaker 0: And that occurred after the Carter administration Yes. Betrayed our ally, the Shah of Iran, and helped the communist two day party in Iran install the current dictatorship.
Speaker 1: That's right. And once the current dictatorship had been installed, the two day party was largely eliminated, which is standard practice once very often for reasons which are too too complex to explain, for example, in in an interview. Briefly. These people are eliminated when they the the sell by date has been passed. Mhmm.
So terrorism by the way, terrorism, of course, is integral with the revolution. I mean, Lenin was a terrorist. Trotsky is a terrorist. The the the Cheka, the predecessor of the KGB, the founder of the KGB was the most one of the most evil men ever to have lived called Felix Drzinski.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: And you might be interested in the following interesting fact. Guess what Felix Dzerzynski's birthday is? Right. September 11. Mhmm.
An interesting pointer.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Interesting point. Well, then let's talk about since we know the the KGB established this terror network in the mid sixties, had two regional directorates for it, the PLO apparatus and the Tricontinental apparatus. What do we know today about its continuity, the the connection it would have to individuals like Osama bin Laden and to Al Qaeda?
Speaker 1: Right. Well, if I could just step back because I I think we've got a slight it it people like us, analysts, we have to put together information which is which is not necessarily current, although we try to live with current, but it's very rare to obtain actual, you know, current information.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: We know that the KGB was we because of Van Dijm Kochegin, we know that the Cuban camp operation was a KGB operation. And we know also that the establishment of training areas in in The Middle East was KGB. But we also know from a source which I found, which is a book by a man called Gale Rivers, who was a New Zealand Terror Expert and an intelligence officer. He writes in a very interesting book called the war against terrorists, how to win it, dated 1986. And I just want to read you this because this is of extraordinary importance.
He says, a recent Russian defector named Bokhan, who was attached to the Soviet embassy in Athens from 1968 to 1975 and was a member of the GRU, the GRU being Soviet military intelligence as opposed to the KGB, confirmed that the GRU was orchestrating terrorist acts both in Greece and abroad with the aim of creating subversion and terror worldwide. Now there you have a smoking gun. This has been in the public domain, this book, since 1986. This is a highly Gale Rivers, a New Zealander trained in the special forces, says in the in the flap. He's an articulate man of high principle who has risked his life many times in the counterterrorist war on five continents.
Now this is not an idle statement. Everything in this book, by the way, that I've read is absolutely first class. So here we have a statement by an expert who knew this, that Soviet military intelligence are behind the terror network, the the terror operation. Now the KGB, of course, is also military intelligence Mhmm. And they're interlinked.
Yes. So you while the distinction is valid, it's also invalid in the sense that the that the the the other name for the Soviet Soviet military intelligence is, in fact, the first chief directorate. So Soviet military intelligence is behind the global terror offensive Yes. Which is a a very key element of the long range strategy. Yeah.
Now why has this been totally ignored by the media and by our governments? The British government and the American government have said absolutely nothing about this. Why is this?
Speaker 0: Well and it's come to the point now where supposedly the leadership of the new democratic Russia is enlisted by the American government to be our advisers, consultants, and partners in fighting and stopping world terrorism. Absolutely right. The very network which since the sixties, under the visible leadership of Yasser Arafat, the Soviet KGB and GRU have controlled. And unfortunately, we've come to a state of affairs today where the Bush administration, as was the case with prior administrations, is giving over a billion dollars a year to the communist PLO specifically to administer its takeover of part of Israel, and we're forcing them on Israel. We're protecting Yasser Arafat from being disturbed or removed by the Israeli government, and we're maintaining the continuity of this Soviet controlled terror network supposedly years after communism disappeared from the planet.
Speaker 1: Yes. And it's gone even further because we now have a prime minister of the Palestinian authority Yes. Whose whose name is Abu Mazen. That's his code name. His real name is Mahud Abbas.
Now this man was, quote, was, in quotes, in control of Hamas, the most devious and most egregious terrorist arm of the PLO. Mhmm. All of a sudden, this man is persona grata in all Western capitals, in Washington, London, and Brussels. And he is he is the new mister mister democracy. Now why is this?
And the answer to this is that, as has happened in the past, this man has been bribed. He has been paid very substantial sums of black operations money to change his tune in order to suit the the objectives of the Western manipulators who are trying to sort of achieve whatever their objective is.
Speaker 0: Well, in a way, as remember Gorbachev lost credibility as an alleged reformer when it was obvious that he was still a Leninist and still promoting Leninist strategy. So they had to bring in a new performer, Yeltsin, appeared to be more likable to the West, and we had we had to definitely support him for fear that some other maniac would come to power. So so in in essence, we got the same thing here. It's a puppet show.
Speaker 1: You've got
Speaker 0: It is a puppet Arafat and a puppet working in the PLO leadership, and it gives the United States government the excuse to support the puppet.
Speaker 1: Don't forget that missus Thatcher said to me when talking about Gorbachev, whom she knew very well, she she said, he's not a Leninist anymore, she said to me.
Speaker 0: But he said he was.
Speaker 1: He said he was a Leninist in all his speeches Yeah. Which I've read.
Speaker 0: He never hesitated to admit.
Speaker 1: He in every he took every opportunity to say, I am a Leninist. I've always been a Leninist. I will always be a Leninist. Mhmm. I've been a communist since since I was born, and I will always remain a communist.
And we will never diverge from the communist past.
Speaker 0: And after he left his role in the Soviet Union of ushering in this post Stalinist Yes. Pretend pretense and performance of the new phase, the fourth program of the Soviet strategy. He came to The United States and continued to promote Leninist strategy and is still doing so today, well funded and supported, promoting world government and
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Worldwide controls in the name of environmentalism.
Speaker 1: Yes. Through an outfit called the go Gorbachev Foundation, which consists entirely of Soviet Aparatchiks. And, by the way, was involved with an outfit called the the state of the world forum, which when translated from Leninist Lenin speak means world state forum. Yes. Anyway, we want need to talk about Saddam Hussein.
Speaker 0: Yes. And as a major as a major example of the fact that there has been no real change in the Soviet Union since 1989 and worldwide and other communist countries, the international terror network controlled by the KGB continues just as active, and it is inconceivable that any alleged group like Al Qaeda or any alleged terrorist operative like Osama Bin Laden could ever function independent of this network.
Speaker 1: That is absolutely true. And indeed, all honest experts acknowledge that it is impossible for any of these operations to take place, particularly the nine eleven one, without a without the support of a of a major power. Now in this connection, we have certain information. First of all, as you know, Saddam Hussein was in business with very important forces in The United States for at least ten years. Mhmm.
This is true.
Speaker 0: And was a major recipient of US government funding and support. That's right. Because when we when we when we turned Iran, The United States Government turned Iran over to the communist and made an enemy state of that, The United States government had the excuse to support Iraq and Saddam Hussein, although controlled by the Soviet military, support him as an alleged buffer against Iran.
Speaker 1: Right. But Iraq is very important because it's quite clear that what's been happening in Iraq is not what you read in the newspapers. Now I mentioned black operations money just now. Mhmm. We can't go into that in much detail here, but the fact is that in under the first Bush administration, an enormous sum of money was raised from 200 banks based abroad, all of them foreign banks.
The sum of money concerned is so enormous that it could not have been raised for any other purpose than the implementation of what I call the new underworld order, if you like. They they actually raised 18 bill 18,000,000,000,000, but the objective was to raise 29.3 29,800,000,000,000.0. And this money, of course, is multiplied, and there's this huge sort of pool of black operations money, which is parked offshore. I mean, this is the this is a separate subject on its own, but I just wanted to give that background in order to
Speaker 0: to come to the point. Can we understand this in summary as the extension of the KGB strategy of functioning as the Russian mafia and extending criminalism as strategy into Western intelligence services.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Okay. There's been a part of it. There's been a merger
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Of intelligence services, both vertically and horizontally. Mhmm. If you if you like vertically with both their own underground criminalist classes and with foreign underground criminalist classes. And the intelligence services are working together. In fact, Condoleezza Rice herself said the other day, we are allies of Russia, which is a a theme.
Mhmm. Is that were those her exact words something like that? She said something similar to that. What she actually means by that is that our intelligence services are hand in glove with the Soviet intelligence services. Now Saddam Hussein was very important in this operation.
Mhmm. Obviously, we don't know everything that we need to know. But at some point, as happens among thieves and among these crooks, they fall out. And there was a falling out between Saddam Hussein and his criminal network and the American criminal operatives at a very, very high level in the American government. And American intelligence, by the way, has a particular specialty, which is to set up their next enemy.
Mhmm. And this is something that you commented to me privately about last night, which is apparently that have been going on for a long time. But I found this out when I was looking at certain documents, and I found that Milosevic, the Yugoslav dictator, had been engaged in business operations with two or three CIA section 18 corporations. That is to say corporations owned by the American government, set up by the CIA. He becomes, you know, persona non grata and is now being arraigned to the The Hague Court.
Exactly the same thing in so many words has happened to Saddam Hussein.
Speaker 0: Who was though in terms of he was supported by the American government, but his infrastructure and military power and installations were all provided by the Soviet military
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: By Soviet military intelligence.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And the Soviet military intelligence would not be creating his military garrison state on a charitable basis without controlling him as a captive puppet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's right. Now I I can't comment on a a that side of it. What I can comment on is that the there is an an aspect of the Iraqi story, which, of course, has never appeared in the mainstream press and probably never will, but we can have a go. Alright?
And that is that there's a computer program by the acronym PROMIS, p r o m I s, which was developed by an American expert called William Hamilton. And this program, in in so many words, enables a user to see inside another government or another bank's database if the other party has got the same program. Now this program was given by The United States by McFarlane, who was the National Security Council chief, wasn't he, at one stage? Yeah. Or the National Security Agency.
I forget. He was this was handed to the Israelis for certain reasons because the CIA can do certain things and cannot do certain things in The United States Mhmm. And employed the Israelis to do it to do them. The Soviets wind up with this with this program Mhmm. Because the Israelis gave it to the Soviets or sold it to the Soviets.
And If we didn't. If we didn't indeed. If if the Americans didn't. Yeah. And it winds up, quote, unquote, on the Soviet black market and is picked up for 2,000,000 by the Iraqis.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: So you wind up at a certain stage in the in the nineties where the Iraqis have got a copy of promise. Mhmm. Now when I mentioned the black operations money, this money is offshore, and the reason it's offshore is that it's part it it's connected with the semi privatization of American intelligence, which occurred as a consequence of president Reagan's executive order one two three three three, under which certain intelligence operations were, quote, unquote, privatized. Now the if you think about this for more than a split second, you can see how incredibly dangerous this is. Because we now have, in The United States, a number of organizations owing allegiance to very important people such as George Bush senior, and I won't various others we could name, who appear to be have been operating as sort of add ons or stand alone intelligence organizations.
Mhmm. Although they are contracted to by the various so called American acronym intelligence agencies.
Speaker 0: Like the CIOs. Right.
Speaker 1: Now as a consequence of this, these people or elements within them believe that some of this money, which is offshore, this black operations money, should be paid to them. Mhmm. So there's a a war going on within fragments of American intelligence to gain access to these funds. Mhmm. And this is the most incredible thing that I've ever heard in my life, and it is something which the American public knows absolutely nothing about.
Speaker 0: But it would allow for people like Mikhail Gorbachev or the current president of the new Russia, Vladimir Putin
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Who actually is, if I'm correct, an officer of the Soviet military intelligence.
Speaker 1: He's a GRU officer, not a KGB officer, widely stated.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Soviet military officer and under Soviet military discipline. Yeah. The present president of the Soviet Union who's supposed to be our ally in the war against terrorism, these guys can get paid off for the role they're playing.
Speaker 1: They did indeed. And both Putin and Gorbachev or the other way around, Gorbachev and Putin were paid 1,000,000,000 each Mhmm. With a promise of 30,000,000,000 each to follow. Mhmm. Now according to my information, which I I'm unable to go into
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: We don't know whether, in fact, the second tranche of the 30,000,000,000 was paid to them both. Mhmm. I suspect they were scammed Mhmm. Because intelligence scams people. That's what they do.
Mhmm. But what happened was that the Soviets took this money. I mean, it wasn't just them who were bribed. It was very senior people, including, I suspect, Primagov, who'll come to in a minute. These people took the money and said, thank you very much.
And then they, of course, have continued with
Speaker 0: their The same strategy, the same work they were doing before promoting the same strategy. Now let's also note that that the principal goal of the Leninist strategy of using terrorism is not just to do the harm that the terrorists do to people and and physical property, but to get the target government to respond in a tyrannical way or we sometimes say the action is in the reaction. As a consequence to this, we have this huge enormous draconian new bureaucracy in The United States, the Department of Homeland Security Yes. Which has now a tremendously invasive controls that violate individual rights of our citizens in the name of fighting terrorism and recently passed Patriot Act legislation which will eventually provide for the same kind of internal pass ports or identification papers that were used in the Soviet Union. And you have in Europe these European arrest warrants coming that that that would enable the European Union to arrest citizens without any recourse civil liberties within within all of Europe and Britain.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I'm very likely to be arrested. I mean, because criticism of the European Union is is is xenophobia.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Right? Under under the the the specially designated crimes within this particular program. But you mentioned pre Primakov. Primakov. And this is very appropriate because Primakov has recently been appointed as a special consultant to the Department of Homeland Security.
Now Yevgeny Primakov is the architect of Middle East terror. He is the key architect.
Speaker 0: The key architect and controller of the communist the KGB terror network PLO directorate. That's correct. And he's our new American government consultant on fighting terrorists.
Speaker 1: Now I I released I published this story recently, and I had it from three separate sources who were not connected. Alright? I've had a lot of emails saying, where did you get this information? And people saying trolling the Internet saying that they've been looking for this information, and they can't find any source except Soviet analyst. Right.
Well, I stand by my story. Right? Right. And in this issue, I just would like to read this. Primakoff, I this is what I wrote.
On being appointed in a recent interview, Primakoff said amid cynical laughter that he couldn't wait to join the pay corps. Mhmm. And that a large number former I always put former in apostrophes, of course, former KGB generals and colonels were lining up to join the rush to be signed up for the American official payroll.
Speaker 0: Yes. To fight terrorism.
Speaker 1: To fight terrorism, which the Soviets are themselves responsible for.
Speaker 0: Directly Continuing to direct and coordinate. And, unfortunately, the American government, principally through a billion dollars given from by the Bush administration to the PLO portion of the directorate, is funding and financing. And yet the American government's response to terrorism is to impose such dictatorial garrison state controls on American citizens that fingernail files can be confiscated from people at airport, something that Adolf Hitler didn't even dream about doing.
Speaker 1: Well, that may be true.
Speaker 0: Once again, Christopher, we barely scratched the surface. I just wanna thank you so much for being with us today and hope it'll be an impetus for our viewers to research this and look into it more. If you're interested in what you heard today, would like to know more of the background and read more about it, have access to these sources, it's very important that you do. Please contact us at the phone number and address given at the end of the program. We'll make sure you have access to them.
Thank you so much. This is Bill McIlhaney for the McIlhaney report. Thank you for joining us today.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
https://thedefensepost.com/2025/01/22/israel-transfer-weapons-ukraine/ Credit @Partisangirl
Israel Offers to Transfer Russian-Made Weapons to Ukraine
An Israeli government official proposed handing over seized Russian-made weapons to Ukraine during an official meeting.
thedefensepost.com
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Wtf is going on here? This is NOT what we voted for. https://t.co/HENlpXlQGl
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring Project Blue Beam and its implications, especially with the recent drone activity. It's crucial to stay informed and not get caught up in potential psyops. There's concern about the COG planning a takeover and implementing emergency powers soon. Bill Cooper also warns about this.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Project Blue Beam Explained https://t.co/zdBrE9LAxZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Project Blue Beam involves using advanced technology to stage fake alien events or attacks. This concept dates back to the late 1950s and early 1960s, with cases like Barney Hill, where human assets were made to appear as aliens. Psychological warfare was authorized in the early 1950s, coinciding with advancements in gravity control. The aim is to condition the public to perceive a threat from outer space, as seen in Hollywood films like Alien and Independence Day. The ultimate goal is to establish a global militarized state uniting against a fabricated extraterrestrial threat, reminiscent of War of the Worlds, which has been a strategy for over 70 years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Project Blue Beam. Can you describe what that is? It's the ability to stage through very advanced technologies an alien attack or an alien event. And it's a whole series of them. Now what most people don't know about since 19 late 50s early 60s like the Barney Hill case and all that, those were all human assets abducting innocent people made to look alien.
And so that psychological warfare began was authorized in the in 1953, 54. 1954, we mastered gravity control. So we started deploying these assets to begin to condition the public that there's a scary threat from outer space. I mean, look at Hollywood, Alien, Ridley Scott's, the movies. If you want to see a script for what's coming fairly soon, look at the movie Independence Day.
It's right out of central casting for this covert group. So what their whole purpose is to create sort of a global militarized totalitarian super state of the world fighting another world. It's like War of the Worlds. Okay. And that's been a 70 year defense.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Longer version Project Bluebeam Explained. (Important information to understand with the recent drone activity. Do not fall for the psyop.) https://t.co/QgPZainfZW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Advanced technologies have been used to stage alien events since the late 1950s, creating a psychological warfare narrative of an extraterrestrial threat. This covert operation aims to establish a global militarized state against an imagined alien adversary. Despite efforts from individuals like Carol Rosin, the truth remains obscured by powerful groups that possess technology far beyond what is publicly known. Historical attempts by leaders like President Clinton to uncover these secrets were thwarted by higher authorities. Corruption and manipulation within these clandestine operations have led to immense power and wealth, posing a significant threat to humanity. The individuals involved are often sociopaths or psychopaths, recruited for their willingness to engage in morally questionable actions. The reality of this situation demands serious attention and awareness from the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's the ability to stage through very advanced technologies, an alien attack or an alien event. And it's a whole series of them. Now what most people don't know about since 19 late fifties, early sixties, like the Barney Hill case and all that, those were all human assets abducting innocent people made to look alien. And so that psychological warfare began was authorized in the in 1953, 54. 1954, we mastered gravity control.
So we started deploying these assets to begin to condition the public that there's a scary threat from outer space. I mean, look at Hollywood, Alien, you know, Ridley Scott's, the movies. If you want to see a script for what's coming fairly soon, look at the movie Independence Day. Okay. It's right at a central casting for this covert group.
So what their their whole purpose is to create sort of a global militarized totalitarian superstate of the world fighting another world. It's like war of the worlds. And that's been a 70 year defense plan. And I know people who've seen that plan. Carol Rosin saw the plan, who is Wernher von Braun's spokesperson who's on our team.
And she's almost 80 now, but brilliant mind. And, you know, when she realized in the '70s that this was what was afoot, she her whole life was devoted to trying to get some of these projects under control. But you're, you know, we're little David's up against an enormous Goliath. And, nevertheless, you know, the truth, that people want the truth, they might Gloria Steinem said, the truth will set you free, but first it'll piss you off. But it's time for people to, you know, actually realize that this is something they have to take seriously.
So there now if you add those capabilities to holographic capability, scalar weapon capability, space time systems where you can alter and sort of alter the flow of space time in an area, which gets into some really as they say, they call this WSFM, weird science and fricking magic. My uncle's company, I met an engineer that dealt with this stuff couple of years ago, and he said, we just call it PFM, pure fucking magic. Excuse my language. But that he says, literally, that's what we call it. So you're dealing with technologies that are and this is the problem.
I call it the big technology gap between what conventional Pentagon, special forces, joint staff, senate intel, armed services, house intel, the president, national security people, what they know and what this group has. So what they know is like this is you know, just to make this real for people, when I was briefing, years ago the admiral in charge of J2 Joint Intelligence for Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Wilson, And that memo leaked out where he was debriefed by doctor Davis and everyone went, oh, my God. And it states when I was there for a stand up briefing. And what they don't know is that at the end of it, I asked the admiral to help us get to the this is 97. This is 26 years ago.
And he said, well, I don't know how I'm going to help with something when the best technology I can deploy, we can deploy is the b two stealth. And this other group have objects that can do circles around the b two stealth, and he acknowledged that to me. I said, well, that doesn't mean you can't. He says, well, I can't unless it's authorized. I said, well, where do you need the authorization?
Well, he felt he needed authorization from the SecDef, who had already been waived off, and the president, which was Clinton at the time, who had also I have a very interesting story since I saw you. But we knew that Clinton had been approached by George H. W. Bush and told, butt out, this is none of your business dealing with the UFO issue. But this was one of the very first things Clinton wanted to know about because I knew people who lived at the White House with him.
You know, he was very keen on getting to the bottom of it. But the efforts he launched were torpedoed, and he eventually backed off of it. Interesting. Yeah. Yeah, I know that whole story.
It's it's an ugly story of corruption and power being abused. But, but he did initially want to really find out what was going on, and it was since a sincere effort. And there was an entire, special operation stood up around getting getting that. But I have a very famous Hollywood agent and a superstar who was in a limo with, they don't really use their names, with with Clinton. Well, after he left office, they asked about the UFO issue.
And the president said, oh, yes. He says, but they I was told by George H. W. Bush that this was none of my business and butt out. And it was made very clear.
You're just the you're you're only the president. You get the drift. So, you know, now, obviously, if we're gonna have a constitution, the rule of law, and a Democratic Republic, that kind of thing cannot stand. But because of the power and the money behind this group, it has stood. And, you know, years ago, 93, I was at the Wrigley Mansion.
And I'll tell you, Sean, it was a very interesting meeting. It was, like, late at night, 10, 11 o'clock at night. And it was a conference room full of suits. And they approached me, and this is, the fall of 93, just before I briefed CIA director, Woolsey. And they said, look, you don't need to be talking.
They knew all about this meeting that was going to happen. And I you don't need to be talking to the president and and the CIA director about this. They don't know anything, and they're not going to know anything. If you want to know, you talk to us. We're the WFO.
We're the work for other contractors. We're the people who are working on these technologies and doing the technology transfer. And then they were trying to convince me to side with what they were doing. And I said, no. I said, this is a corrupt enterprise.
And then he offered that he says, you're a doctor. You can take out as many credit cards as you want. We'll zero them out each month because we run the supercomputers that back up the entire banking system. And we can get an infinite amount of money through certain techniques. And so we'll just zero them out.
I said, then you're gonna own me, aren't you? Because isn't that credit card fraud and banking fraud? He says, no. We're just trying to help. You see how these this is an absolutely true story.
He put me under sodium pentothal lie detector. But at the end of it, he said, look, we have given at least this is now remember, this is 30 years ago. We have given at least 10,000 people $10,000,000 a piece or more to secure their cooperation with this project. Wow. And that was 30 years ago.
Now money is no object if you're printing this stuff up and you're running drugs and you're trafficking and you're siphoning off from the legitimate black budget, which there is a legitimate black budget that's overseen by the President and the key people in the Congress. We're totally legitimate. But a lot of money from that is siphoned off and is through overbilling to the government into these illegal projects. It's absolutely embezzlement. So we can prove this, by the way.
And I have people who've seen it happen. Okay? But I think that when you look at that and you go, okay. Well, this is where the center of power is. The center of power is not in the Congress, and it's not in the White House, and it's not in the legal constitutional government or the main part of the Pentagon or agency.
It's in this group. And it's amassed so much power and wealth and technology that it is, and I'll be blunt, a threat to all life on earth. It's a threat. It's way greater threat than China or Iran or Russia ever. And I think people have to take this, what I just said, very seriously because all these other skirmishes, even if there were a couple nukes detonated, nothing compared the risk this group poses given the technologies they possess and the intention to use it in a malevolent way, where they could stampede the whole world on the trajectory that would be, you know, an Armageddon scenario.
So unfortunately, these people are serious about it. They're whacked out, in my opinion. One of the, NOC I recently met with, he says, yes, well, even in this world that he's been in this super black dark world and very high up, relatively high up, mid level anyway. And he said the way for the folks who are these really super rogue operators, they're recruited for being sociopaths or psychopaths. Now he says, I was recruited because I was willing to kill on behalf of the country or what's right, but but not being a sociopath, to do it for the good if you're going to use lethal force or any any technology.
These folks running these projects are a subset of people who are screened who are in fact sociopaths and psychopaths. And I'm using this clinically as a doctor. There's 4 a half percent of the US population are sociopaths and psychopaths. So I mean and the ones that are high functioning are identified and moved over into these rogue operations. Interesting.
Yeah. Smart. Extremely smart. Yeah. Let's take a quick break.
Sure. And then we're going to get into the disclosure.
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
What's really going on with the drone invasion? π» Is the COG (Continuity of GovernmentΒ ) planning a takeover & and implementing emergency powers before January 20th? #ProjectBlueBeam #FalseFlag https://t.co/Edo7qQCb8p
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Homeland Synchronizer operation, led by General Gregory Guilla in November, tested drone swarms against unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Following this, Guilla wrote an article emphasizing the lack of defense against unmanned systems. This echoes the sentiments of retired commander Van Herc, who previously suggested that unidentified objects could be extraterrestrial. The continuity of government (COG) protocols, originally focused on nuclear threats, were expanded in 2007 to include UAPs. This shift, influenced by figures like Dick Cheney, raises concerns about emergency powers and the potential for a shadow government to take control, particularly during a transition of presidential power. The implications of these developments suggest a deeper, more complex narrative surrounding national security and unidentified threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And while you set it up really well there because there's a number of different factors involved, you're not just talking about hardware. You're not just talking about technical things. You're right. There's other backdrop deep in the middle of all this, and that, is is kind of like a mystical side to it.
But what I will say this in relation to the, homeland synchronizer op. This is an operation that was taking place, and it took place in November. And it was done by, general Gregory Guilla, who was the NORTHCOM commander and the COG NORAD commander. This guy did an incredible, series of operations. And what happened was they tested out drones forms versus UAP and what would happen in the midst of all that.
They were testing that November 28th. Okay? Then you get a couple of weeks into this and we're getting all these drone swarms right on the heels of it. November 28th, the COG commander goes and writes an article for the Wall Street Journal. And in the article, it states the US homeland is not defended and goes into a whole spiel about how we need to defend against these unmanned drone systems.
Now this was the same that commander, Van Herc, who's retired now, and it's Gio is the active one. But Van Herc is interesting because in 2023, when he was the COD commander, they had the Chinese balloon piece. And when they were doing the Chinese balloon piece, they asked him, do you think it's extraterrestrial? And he said, it could be anything. And they ran away with the headline right there that said, oh, it's extraterrestrial, you know, the whole thing that we're seeing over Canada, these other sightings, and all the balloons, they're actually ET and we're shooting them down.
So there's weird UFO shoot down headlines. This was the threat narrative that was being built up in the background. It's sort of like a subconscious layer. It's it's they didn't, freak out about it, but they put it out there enough. And they didn't have Biden or the defense secretary.
They have the COG commander. Well, I can tell you this is an interesting thing. Those guys usually stay way, way in the background. As a matter of fact, you couldn't even mention COG in congress, if you were bringing things up in the eighties nineties, nearly 2000. The rules got changed around COG in 2007.
That's when they started to incorporate the aspects of drones, UAP, and UFOs. That's the key change. And the person in the middle of all that was Dick Cheney, who'd been a part of the original setup of COG back in the 19 eighties. When you saw Liz Cheney out there, railing hard against Trump, it seemed unusual even for the never Trumpers for someone to be that hardcore and then to actually join the other team and try to railroad, Trump and actually get him out of office. Now it's interesting because what happened is that Cheney, Liz Cheney represents that COG branch in the public.
This is where they stand. They didn't want Trump to get in there under any circumstances. So now they have a window, and that window operates between here and January 20th when he gets in. And we're seeing things that call into question the entire emergency powers doctrine of the United States. That emergency powers doctrine states, and it's not constitutional and it's not legal, but it says what would happen in the case of an emergency through the same rules that were crafted in 2007 under Bush second, those rules state that they can take over the United States and set up regional governors.
That's the nature of the problem with that. The original COG doctrine was just for a nuclear war. They changed it. And, that's where the nature of the problem is. The UFO emergency, the UFO threat aspect that the intelligence agencies have pushed, CIA, NGA, NSA, they've been pushing it since 2017.
Remember before they used to suppress all this stuff and say it didn't exist. Well, they can turn it on and turn it off, apparently, just like we had John Kirby at the Pentagon saying, none of this. There are no drones. Those are just planes people are seeing and they're operated lawfully.
Speaker 1: And by the way, since you raised that, I was telling the crew literally as you said that, hey, get that clip of Kirby ready for a few days ago. But for people that miss what you just said, I wanna slow down and repeat it and elaborate because what you said is just some godsmacked. It's hiding in plain view, and I'm aware of everything you're saying and the drills and all that. You've got Kirby saying everything's fine. There's nothing.
But you've got the head of NORTHCOM and the previous head saying, no. This is imminent, and and we don't know what it is. And, oh, we've gotta get ready because that triggers under the new COG laws that they got in 2007, not just a nuclear threat to activate. But if we don't know and there's these unknown things, now the shadow government takes over right before Trump gets in. And he may never even know they've activated all this stuff and what it really means that it now walls it off from him.
Is is that what you're saying?
Speaker 0: Exactly. Exactly. And that that gets right into the detail of it. What it is in the heart of this program really is how do you activate emergency powers? Which is, you know, what are the actual protocols for doing it?
What's the level of threat that you need to actually replace the president? And, it's very clear if you look at the continuity of government profile and in their deep details, what they did is they changed. In the 19 eighties, they started a change, and that was involved with Rumsfeld when he was, you know, the CEO of a chemical company, a pharmaceutical company. And Cheney was in there, and it was unusual because the COG thing kinda went underground a little bit during the Clinton era because they had a lot of shifting around to do. As soon as they got Bush and 9 11, they activated COG during 9 11.
And, you know, we had some unusual things and some unusual crossover with the assassination attempt on Trump because the secret service, leader at that point was the same woman who had dragged Dick Cheney into the COG bunker during 911. Well, I don't mention Cheney as just kind of a punch line. He was deeply involved with crafting the continuity of government protocols in 2007 before they left.
Speaker 1: And he was a protege of Lenin, sir, who got fired by Kennedy for trying to do a COG.
Speaker 0: Yes. Absolutely. And that's where you know, when you get that whole operation Northwoods thing, and you you really put operation Northwoods, you know, on the radar. And it's very interesting because operation North
@SaltyGirl09 - ππΈπππ πΎπβπ
Bill Cooper Warns About Project Bluebeam. Do not fall for the psyop. https://t.co/NvSK0n4Hzi
Video Transcript AI Summary
I once believed in extraterrestrials based on intelligence documents, but after extensive research, I found no evidence of their existence. Instead, I uncovered a conspiracy involving the Illuminati, which promotes the idea of an alien threat to unify the world under a single government. The UFOs people see are likely advanced technology developed by the U.S. and other nations, not aliens. Cattle mutilations are linked to government radiation monitoring, not extraterrestrial activity. Alleged alien abductions are a result of sophisticated mind control techniques. The culture in America is on the brink of civil war, with various factions vying for power. Many are unaware of the impending conflict, but those who took an oath to defend the Constitution are prepared to fulfill it, even at great personal cost. The year 2000 is crucial for those pushing for world government, but the hysteria surrounding it is a human-made deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You think about it again?
Speaker 1: I don't think there are any. At one time, I thought that there were simply based upon documents that I'd seen while I was attached to the intelligence briefing team, the commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. At that time, and and even for many years afterwards, I did not believe that the government would use me in that way. I had devoted my whole life to government service. I had been in the air force.
I was in the navy. I was a river patrol boat captain in Vietnam. I had I had proved myself. I had combat ribbons with the beef and valor. There was no doubt of my loyalty to my country, and maybe that's why it was so easy to use me because I wouldn't doubt that what I saw was real.
But over the years, I've done a lot of research. What I've discovered is there's no proof existing anywhere that extraterrestrials are real or that have ever visited this planet, or that they exist anywhere in the universe. There is not one shred of evidence anywhere. There is lots of evidence, tons of it in fact, that there are a group of people collectively known as the Illuminati who want us to believe in some extraterrestrial threat from space so that they can cause a world government, you know, bringing together of all the people to resist that external threat. And, the first time that I saw any reference to that, I was reading some papers from the Carnegie Endowment Fund.
And there was a record of a speech. Well, it was a dinner for Viscount Nishi of the Japanese delegation, the Japanese Imperial Delegation in 1917. And John Dewey was was one of the speakers. And the first sentence out of his mouth as I was reading this almost fell out of my chair because this was in 1917. And he said, the best way to cause all people in the world to come together in in one world government and end war forever would be if we were attacked by some other species from some other planet.
And boy, that just clicked with me and I knew that, that that this is just another scam. This is the age of deception. There's no doubt about it. And then, 8 times during Reagan's administration, he inserted almost the exact same phrase into 8 of his speeches. And, it's a scam.
That's that's what I can tell you. What they call UFOs, these craft that fly around the sky are real. But they're not piloted by some little green guy from some other planet. They're owned and operated by the United States of America for 1, the Soviet Union for another, probably Great Britain, Canada. I think the the first really operable ones were probably manufactured in Western Canada in the wilderness in a in a in a place especially built to to create those machines like we created, the Manhattan Project, and and the same kind of secrecy surrounded it.
So the technology is real. It's been kept secret, and it's been used to promote this concept that there's an alien threat to this earth. The cattle mutilations I've discovered in my research are nothing more than than what's left after the government, does its secret tests on the low level radiation leakage from its atomic weapons, assembly plants, and atomic power plants. It's a low level radiation monitoring project. And if you look at what's missing in the cattle, you'll see that it's just as clear as day.
They take the lips. They take the tongue. They take a 6 inch patch of skin. They core out the the, the rectum, the colon area where those kinds of things would collect it. They would pass through the through the, digestive system.
On on female cows, they take the they take the other, to check for low oil radiation in milk. Is it being passed to the calves? And these are all grazing animals that graze on the grass that where the radiation falls when it falls from the air. And, it's just an incredible deception and I'm just amazed that people have fallen for it in the manner that they have in the absence of any proof whatsoever. I mean, they cite hearsay as proof.
Speaker 0: Well, what about all of the alien abductions?
Speaker 1: They're not abductions. They're the results of a tremendously successful and very sophisticated mind control operation. All of which has been in development. Well, they started working on those kinds of things since before World War II. But they have perfected them.
On my website, I have a patent to the machine that can read your brainwaves, can recombine them in a computer and send them back to you and make you think things happened that never happened. I mean, you can't get a patent for something like that unless it really works. You have to prove it to the patent office. It works. A patent was issued.
And this is just one of the things that snuck by them that has it. Because when people invent things like this, they're sucked up by the government immediately, then they're they're put behind the veil of national security and classified and then nobody knows about them. But every once in a while, something sneaks by them. And when you do these searches in the patent office and trademark office and in the copyright office, you come up with some real gems once in a while. Yep.
That was one. Also, the congressional investigations into the, the intelligence community has revealed the existence of these programs. I mean, there's there's no secret about it. It's documented. Project Artichoke, Project MK Ultra, MK Naomi.
You know, I could go on and on and on all day long and, you know, if you have the time of your movie, we could lay out all the documentation which is official government documentation and prove, beyond any shadow of a doubt that it's true. But that's what it is. It's not extraterrestrials coming down. The human body cannot pass through walls or roofs, or or through windows that are closed. You know, this is all the product of the imagination and and people's willingness, to believe something because they want it to be true.
I don't know why they would want it to be true. You see, because if if it were true, these are not friendly aliens. They're doing some terrible things to people. If I were to kidnap somebody, pass them up through the roof, take them somewhere, perform operations on them, and then take samples of semen and and ova from their, you know, reproductive organs and and, plant thoughts in their mind and and all this kind of stuff and then bring them back. Guess where I'd be right now?
In prison. That's kidnapping. It's criminal. It's terrible thing. So, there there's a, there's a morbid sense about all this too, is that people wanna be hurt for some reason.
I don't understand that. But that that certainly is something that that somebody needs to look at. Why do people feel that this needs to be real? What in them says I wanna be abducted and abused and kidnapped and and raped and and all of this stuff against my will? Because they seem to take, some kind of satisfaction that this has happened.
And and nobody's talking about the fact that this is a terrible thing to happen. If I were to do that to you, you wouldn't be too happy, would you? But somehow it's okay if an alien does it. I don't think so. It's all bullshit.
It's a lie.
Speaker 0: So where do you feel the culture of America lies? Oh, this is William Cooper. A man who received mainstream attention in 1994 when Rush Limbaugh read an alleged White House memo on the air calling him the most dangerous radio host in America. Maybe that's because this conspiracy classic is the underground bestseller, or perhaps it's because of the increasing popularity of his shortwave radio broadcast, which is also available on the Internet.
Speaker 1: Good evening. You're listening to the Hour of the Time. I'm still William Cooper.
Speaker 0: This was not an easy interview to Nat. He was the first person I asked, and after 8,000 miles and 6 and a half weeks on the road, just about the last to agree. I guess he wanted to make sure I was serious. Nevertheless, I had to come alone, and I was required to follow clear rules of conduct.
Speaker 1: Well, at this point, I've done so much research on this. I have to tell you, there's only one way this is going. There's gonna be a civil war in this country. And I hope the outcome of the war will be the reinstatement of constitutional republican government. But whenever you have a war like that, you're gonna have competing factions to be the winner.
And whoever really has the power in the end is going to institute whatever kind of government they feel should be there. There are people in this country who believe that a religious theology or theocracy, should prevail. Well, if that happened, we'd have burnings at the stake again and and inquisitions and heretics and all of these kinds of things. So that can't be allowed to happen. Can't be.
Doesn't matter what my religion is. It can't be allowed to happen. There are people who want a socialist government much like the one in Sweden. There are people who want to create in the United States what the Soviet Union had hoped to be. There are real Nazis.
All of them socialist. Hitler was a socialist. So I see the future as being tremendously dangerous for all of us. Me and and many others like me are are going to perform a valiant attempt to reinstate, restore legitimate lawful constitutional republican government. Whether or not we're gonna be successful, I can't tell you.
But I will tell you that once this war starts, it's going to be terrible. It's going to be bloody. And it'll last for 10 to 15 years. That's the nature of this kind of conflict. If you look around all these mountains around here, there's enough guns, ammunition, supplies, clothing, and food buried in these mountains to support an army for 15 years.
And I I don't think the American people realize that they're on the brink of a civil war. You see, there are many of us who took an oath when we went in the armed forces and we meant it. We volunteered. We weren't drafted. We care about this country.
And the oath was to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And we will fulfill that oath even if it means we die in the process of doing it. It's that simple.
Speaker 0: So what do you see happening in the next 4 to 6 months?
Speaker 1: Well, I don't I don't have a crystal ball. All I know is that the year 2000 is crucial to the plans of those who want world government because they've whipped up sort of a millennium fever and they've coupled that with y two k and a whole bunch of other things, Real religious people who think that this is the end of the world and Jesus is coming or somebody's coming imminently. And, so there's this fever that's whipped up. I mean, everybody seems to be on the edge of some kind of hysteria, but it's all in their mind. If you look around, you see the world hasn't changed.
It's not coming to an end. This hasn't been brought about by the hand of God. It's been brought about by the deceptions of man. And the quicker people realize that and try and find out who is causing these things to to whip up this hysteria, the the better off they're gonna be.