TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SaraGonzalesTX
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
DALLAS, TX: The pro-illegal alien rally was not happy when I showed up. I was immediately surrounded and threatened. Do these look like innocent people just here in search of a better life?👇🏽 https://t.co/f99FDW83O6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Don't touch my phone! Someone just ran her over. You think you're tough? Let’s talk about the rape trees and the children harmed by coyotes and cartels. You’re quiet now? If you're here illegally, enjoy your stay, but you’ll be deported soon. This land wasn’t stolen; it was conquered. Families can be deported together. Borders matter, and being here illegally is a crime. If you love Mexico, go back. I can't wait for ICE to deport you. You’re free to leave right now. We’re going to restore law and order in America. Your flag is upside down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I cannot Don't touch my phone. Go. Don't touch Don't touch Don't touch Don't touch Don't touch Someone just run her over. Let's go. I'm sorry.
What? Go. Hey. Hey. You said a runner over?
Hey. Hey. Run me over. I look like what? Like a real big home.
Like a real big home? You feel like a big man talking like that? You feel like a big man, Patty? Go back home. Go back home.
How about the rape trees? Let's talk about the rape trees on the way from Mexico to America. Let's talk about the children who are raped repeatedly by coyotes and cartels and criminals. Oh oh, you're oh, you're quiet now. Oh, you walk away?
Oh, you don't wanna talk about that. You don't wanna talk about the women and the children that are being killed. If you are here illegally, enjoy your stay. You're getting deported soon. This is not stolen land.
It was conquered. Sorry your people were too weak. It's all in hatred and murder. I I will it's a public place if you do that. That's assault.
But I can give a fuck, bitch. You got me fucked up, though. Look. It's just these nice nice people here for a better life. Families do belong together.
You can all be deported together. No. No. No. No.
No. No. Actually, borders are a thing. And if you're here illegally, then you're illegal. I should walk into traffic.
I should walk into traffic. I should walk into traffic. Okay. Stop touching me. Stop running into me.
Ma'am, your arm is very fat and you're running it into me on purpose. Please stop touching me. If you love Mexico so much, please go back. Are you here illegally?
Speaker 1: You're a tripping.
Speaker 0: You are? Yes. I can't wait until ice deport you. Come on. I'm allowed to walk on the sidewalk.
Thank you. Take you on a trip. You'll appreciate the steps. Go home. I'm probably hungry.
Please go back. Don't try. You're probably hungry, girl. I don't want that. You need luck.
You need luck. I love that stuff.
Speaker 1: Long to get I've never been a game crew. That's a shithole. The cartel run the country. You. I love that stuff.
Speaker 0: Long to get I've never been a game crew. That's a shithole. The cartel run the country. We have to be the slice, mom. You can even get very You gotta be slaves.
Ma'am, you're free to go home literally right now. I know you don't love law and order, but we're gonna have it here in America again. Enjoy your stay. It will be very brief from here on out. Your flag is upside down, ma'am.
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
WHOA: Texas Rep @Toth_4_Texas forces Speaker @Burrows4TX to admit that he’s using OBAMA’S FORMER COUNSEL, Hugh Brady, as his parliamentarian. DEMOCRATS are quietly running the Texas House👇🏽 https://t.co/smUGi1KKUh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister Speaker, I have a parliamentary inquiry regarding the initials SC, HLB, and TS on pages HR 3 and HR 4. Does HLB refer to Hugh Brady?
Yes, it does.
When we spoke last week, you mentioned that Hugh Brady would not be the parliamentarian. Is that still the case?
That is not a proper parliamentary inquiry.
Isn't knowing who the parliamentarian is essential for a legitimate inquiry?
The rules state that house officers will be appointed and announced soon.
So, is Hugh Brady still our parliamentarian?
No permanent officers have been appointed yet for this session.
Thank you, Mister Speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister speaker, parliamentary inquiry. State your state your inquiry. At the bottom of each of page HR 3 and HR 4, we see the initials SC, HLB, and TS. Does HLB refer to Hugh Brady? Yes.
It does. Thank you. Mister Speaker, parliamentary inquiry. So you're inquiring? When you and I spoke last week, you told me that Hugh Brady would not be the parliamentarian.
Is that still the case or not the case?
Speaker 1: That is not a proper parliamentary inquiry.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Mister speaker, one last parliamentary inquiry. State your inquiry. This inquiry seeks clarification on a key detail that governs the contact of house proceedings. Isn't knowing who the parliamentarian is the basis for a legitimate parliamentary inquiry?
Speaker 1: Say that again.
Speaker 0: Isn't knowing who the parliamentarian is over this house a proper parliamentary inquiry? Shouldn't we know who's calling balls and
Speaker 1: The rules provide that the officers of the house will be appointed, and that will be announced very soon.
Speaker 0: So Hugh Brady is still our parliamentarian?
Speaker 1: No permanent officers have been appointed yes yet for this session.
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister speaker.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking claim that General Mark Milley authorized the use of directed energy weapons during the 2020 riots, potentially to incite violence. It raises questions about whether these methods were also employed during January 6th.
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
🚨 BOMBSHELL 🚨 @TPC4USA says he has evidence that General Mark Milley authorized the use of heat and sound directed energy weapons during the 2020 riots. These can be used to agitate people & turn them violent. If they were used in the summer of love, were they used on J6?? https://t.co/3TuIKY15vT
Video Transcript AI Summary
New information is emerging about January 6th. A new article will reveal that General Mark Milley, during the Trump administration in June 2020, authorized the use of heat and sound directed energy weapons against protesters in Washington, D.C. We have photographic evidence to support this claim, and the article will be released tomorrow, leading to further discussions about January 6th.
The sound energy weapons can be set to either super audible, which deters crowds, or sub audible, which can incite chaos and violence, referred to as agitation weapons. This raises concerns about the government's role in events like January 6th, suggesting potential entrapment of citizens by their own agencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You keep coming up with these scoops regarding January 6th. Do you have anything else that's that's coming up?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I paid very close attention to probably I thought it was gonna be out today, but we got a couple little couple little things we gotta clean up on a new article. And we know for a fact now that General Mark Milley, who is the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, back under the previous Trump administration, we know that in June of 2020 during the riots on the Summer of Love here in DC, he actually directed and ordered and authorized the use of both heat and sound directed energy weapons to be used against the protesters in that event. We have the photography now to prove it, to back it up, and we're going to be coming out of that story tomorrow. Then we'll be launching a series off of that first article that will lead us to January 6th as well.
Speaker 0: Which which just what heat and sound, which which would do what?
Speaker 1: Well, there depends upon which switch is used. It depends. If they are using sound energy weapons, they can be super audible or they can be sub audible. If they're set to super audible, that's supposed to scare people away from a riot. If they're set to sub audible, it can make people go crazy in their head and force them into violence.
They call those agitation weapons.
Speaker 0: So I'm gonna go back and I'm gonna, like, rewind about 10 minutes ago when I said that I believe that January 6th was total entrapment by the United States government, in order to weaponize their own agencies against their people. I'm just gonna go ahead and rewind, and I'm gonna say that again, and I'm gonna, go ahead and double down on that at this point, Steve.
Speaker 1: You probably have valid reasons to feel the way you feel.
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
Full episode here: https://youtube.com/live/DWo4aNkSQrI?feature=share
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
Holy sh*t. This is a must watch 👇🏽 https://t.co/sfYst5giCL
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump wanted a conditions-based withdrawal from Afghanistan. During negotiations with the Taliban, Trump told the Taliban leader through a translator that if they harmed a single American, he would kill them. Trump then handed the Taliban leader a satellite photo of his home. According to the speaker, after this incident, no Americans were killed in Afghanistan for 18 months. The speaker equates this to strength, suggesting that under President Trump, other countries would fear harming American interests abroad due to the potential consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He said, why do you send me a picture of my house? I said, you're gonna have to figure that out, Abdul. And for 18 months, we had nobody killed. I'll give you my favorite Trump my my favorite president Trump story. It's my number one favorite of all time.
When we were negotiating with the Taliban while president Trump was still the president, president Trump wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but he wanted a conditions based withdrawal. Meaning that you do what we tell you to do and then we'll start pulling troops back slowly as long as you abide by our rules. It's president Trump, Mark, and Mike Pompeo, and they are talking to Taliban leadership in the room, and they had one translator in the room. President Trump looked at at the Taliban leader and said this, I wanna leave Afghanistan, but it's gonna be a conditions based wrong. And translator translated.
And he said, if you arm a a hair on a single American, I'm gonna kill you. And the translator goes the truck goes, tell him that. The translator Yes. Tell him what I said. Reached in his pocket, pulled out a satellite photo of the leader leader of the Taliban's home, and handed it to Shut up.
Got up and walked out the room. Do you know for 18 months not a single American was killed in Afghanistan? That's the definition of strength. That's what I'm talking about. And so you could imagine that kind of sentiment being around the world.
If we have an embassy in another country, no one's gonna touch it because they're gonna be fearful, but they don't get a Moab on their head. That's how president Trump rolls.
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
🚨 BREAKING: Lakewood Church shooter identified as a transgender, legal name Genesse Moreno but went by the name “Jeffrey.” 🚨 https://t.co/0gmgybgOLC
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
Previous mugshots show her looking much more feminine. https://t.co/n8vKtpRhGs
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
Transgender ideology kills.
@SaraGonzalesTX - Sara Gonzales
WOW. Colorado State Rep @_timhernandez when asked if he would condemn Hamas slaughtering innocent women and children: “What about it?”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses their strong disapproval of the protesters and their cause. They challenge the listener to condemn the killing of women, children, and elderly individuals in the streets, but the listener refuses to give a clear answer. Speaker 0 believes that anyone watching would see this lack of response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think it's despicable what they're protesting for and what you are protesting protesting for. And the fact that you can't condemn women and children and elderly people being murdered in the streets. What about it? Do you condemn it? I already said it.
Why can't you say yes? Because I already gave you my answer. You didn't give answer. And every I think anybody who watches would understand